Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Regular Agenda Packet 06-23-2015Clll,1' 0, LAKE LS111C.)KE City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITYMANAGER LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 PM PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CITY VISION STATEMENT The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams. City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov't Code § 54957(b)): City Manager CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (2 potential cases) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (1 potential case) PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS Recognition of Sheriff Deputy Carl Coats Recognition of Sheriff Sergeant Pete Giannakakos Proclamation Declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and turn it in to the City Cleric The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak) City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-640 Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Attachments: CC Minute Report 6-9-2015 CC Minutes 2) ID# 14-641 City Investment Report for May 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015, Attachments: City Investment Staff Report 2015-05 City Investment Report 2015-05 3) ID# 14-642 Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of one (1) service body fleet vehicle to be awarded to Lake Chevrolet in the amount of $40,287.18. Attachments: AAc uisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Staff Report Exhibit A - Acquisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle Reguest for Proposal (RFP Exhibit B- Acquisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle - Service Bed Lake Chevrol 4) ID# 14-643 Approval of Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe to Provide Specialized Planning Services for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe for the provision of specialized planning services to the City of Lake Elsinore during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Consultant Services Contract 2015-2016 - Carole Donahoe - CC Staff Report - f Draft Consultant Services Contract 2014-2015 - Carole Donahoe 6-23-15 5) ID# 14-644 Approve designation of Mayor as City Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayor as the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 - October 2, 2015 in San Jose. Attachments: Staff report LOCC Voting Delegate LOCC Annual Conference Voting Delegate City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Printed on 6/18/2015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 6) 7) 8) 9) ID# -14-645 Professional Services Agreement between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore (Serenity Park Phase II Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement by and between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount not to exceed $79,409 for landscape architecture, engineering services and reimbursables related to design development and construction documents for Serenity Park Phase II located at 19685 Palomar Road and the adjacent 2.68 acre parcel (APN 370-120-045) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report - RHA Agenda Report 6-23-2015 ATTACHMENT - RHA Proposal - Serenity Park Improvements ATTACHMENT- RHA Schedule of Proposed Fees Costs ATTACHMENT- RHA Professional Services Aqreement ID# 14-646 Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Approve and award the Agreement for Contractor Services to West Coast Arborist in the amount of $85,000 (plus 10% contingency, for a total budget of $93,500) for Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such form as approved by the City Attorney, and Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments not to exceed 10% contingency, as needed for emergency/extra work. Attachments: Staff Report Tree Trimming Contractor Services Agmt 2015 ID# 14-647 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with HR Green California. Inc. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with HR Green California, Inc., for engineering, project support, and plan check services in the amount of $242,080, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney, Attachments: Staff Report -Amendment No 2 HR Green Attachment'A' - HR Green - Amendment No 2 to PSA Attachment'B' - Active List of Land Use Applications ID# 14-648 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement With Sustainable Civil Engineering Services Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to approve the third year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Sustainable Civil Engineering Services, Inc. (SCES), for project management and plan check services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report -Extend SCES PSA -Amendment No. 3 Attachment A - Amendment No. 3 to SCES PSA City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 611812095 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 10) 11) 12) ID# 14-649 Award Agreement for Professional Services for I-15/Main Street Interchange Design Services Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Award Agreement for Professional Services to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions for the Design of the 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals; and Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $238,668 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff ReportMain Street -15 Design Services PSA PSA with Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Professional Services 2015 ID# 14-650 Award Construction Contract to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. For Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements - CIP Project No. 4369 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $234,833 for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney, and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the total Agreement, pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. Attachinents: Staff Report -Whisker's Parking Lot Improvement Construction Services Agmt ID# 14-651 Agreement For Operational Management of La Laguna Resort And Boat Launch Between Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. And City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Approve the Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report -- La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 ATTACHMENT - La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 Final City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING(S) 13) ID# 14-652 Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 & Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. C.) Introduce by title only and waive further reading of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements. Attachments: SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Staff Report 6-2" SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Vicinity Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07, The Village at Lakeshore - Aerial Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 -The Village at Lakeshore - CC Resolutions and SPA 2014-02 & RDR 20147-07- The Villaoe at Lakeshore - Amended S gcific F SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - AMND 6-23-16 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 4-21 SPA 20'14-02 &RDR 2014-07 -The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staft Report 5-5- APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) 14) ID# 14-653 Professional Services Agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. (DMG Economics) for Provision of Economic Development Services Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018. City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 Printed on 6/18/2015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 Attachments: Staff Report - 7-14-2015 dmg FINAL DMG INC Professional Services Agreement 7-1-2015 DMGCo rporate Profi Ie0615 15) ID# 14-654 City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform and Resolution No. 2015-061 Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and B.) Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Attachments: Staff report Legislative Platform - 3 revised Reso on Legislative Program and Policy revised 3 LegislativePlatformFinal 2 Council Policy No 400-13 Legislative Platform and Program Policy 2 revised PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it in to the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 16) TMP -938 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments: Monthly Reports Update on Designated Swimming Areas " 4th of July Fireworks CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 6/18/2015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do affirm that a copy of the agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 8 Prinfed on 6/18/2015 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 1) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-640 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 CI'I Y ()F LI REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk DATE: June 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of June 9, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron, Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 9, 2015 Cll'1' DI' ., i�r31�F_ tsi ly<�Iz�. DR1 W R. City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER LAI<F-FI.SINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CHILI URAL CENTER 163 N. MAIN SI REET LAI<E ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, June 9, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. Mayor Manos called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council would discuss the Itern identified on City Council Closed Session. Closed Session at 5:02 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Mayor Manos reconvened the meeting at 7,00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE be meeting in Closed Session to The City Council recessed to The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Marissa Hill, Senior with Girl Scout Troop # 1124. City o/Lake Elsinore page 1 City Council Meeting Minutes ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss one (1) potential case of Anticipated Litigation, pursuant to paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9. City Attorney Leibold stated that no reportable action was taken. PRESENTATIONS ICEREMONIALS '** Recognition of Girl Scout Troop # 1124 Mayor Manos and Council Member Johnson presented certificates of recogntion to Girl Scout Troop # 1124. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pam Nelson, resident of Warner Springs and Chair of the Sierra Club of the San Gorgonio Chapter, thanked Council and staff for their support of the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail Project. The four (4) city planning team, Cities of Temecula, Wildomar, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, and the Sierra Club received the Merit Award from the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Ms.Nelson recognized former staff member Claudia Davis and Community Services Director Skinner. Sonja Wang, new owner of the The Links thanked Mayor Manos, Council Member Johnson and City Manager Yates. Ms. Wang stated as new owners, they are committed to restore and maintain The Links as a premier recreation center. Robert Lewis, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke regarding future development in the Alberhill area and stated it is his understanding the delay is that the City is not releasing the necessary documents for public comments. Mr. Lewis requested that the City release the necessary documents, so that the public can make comments regarding development of the Alberhill area. Cil,of Lake EWnw, p.,g 2 June 9, 2095 City Council Meeting Minutes CONSENTCALENDAR 1) Dlf 14-609 Approval of Minutes Attachments: CC Minute Report CC Minutes of 5-12-2015_ It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. 2) ID# 14-610 Warrant List dated May 28 2015 Attachments: City Staff Report 6-09-15 Warrant Summary City -05 28 15 WarrantList Cit v 05 28 15 It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on May 28, 2015. 3) ID# 14-611 Annual Adoption of the Investment Policy Attachments: REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL -2015 Investment Poles 2015 Investment Policy. City of Lake Elsinore Memo PFM Group June 9, 2015 Under Government Code Section 53646(a), the City's Investment Policy should be reviewed and adopted by City Council on an annual basis. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the policy. 4) ID# 14-612 CR&R - Annual Consumer Price Index Increase Attachments: 201CR&R Annual Consumer Price Index Iticrease 2015 Schedule of Rates Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the annual increase information. 6) ID# 14-613 Award Agreement for Public Works Construction For Annual Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A Attachments: Staff Repon -Award Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A CitywideSlurry Seal Program- Phase 1A Apmnt Citywide SlurrySeal Phasc_1A Appendix A It Is recommended that the City Council: A.) Award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to All American Asphalt in the amount of $137,783.36, for the Annual Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute change orders not to exceed 15% contingency amount for adjustment in bid quantities; and City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted into the City's maintained system. 6) ID# 14-614 Amended and Restated Park Implementation Agreement for 24 Acre Park within the Eastlake Specific Plan Affachrnenrs: StaN Report - Summerly Civic Park Implementation /agreement 060415 24 AC Community Park Site Update Park Concept Plan 060415 Park Implementation Agreement 060315 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Amended and Restated Park Implementation Agreement in substantially the form and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 7) IN 14-615 Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District & the Landscaping & Street Lighting District No. 1 for the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Ordering the Preparation/Approval of Engineer's Reports and Resolutions of Intention Attachments: 2015-06-09 Ilmd ew and Ilmd no 1 FY 15-16 Lake Elsinore Citvwide LMD Enoineei's Report (060115M6) FY 1516 Lake Elsinore LMD1 En ineer's Reppg_nG0115M61 Reso 2015-049 Reso 2015(50 Reso 2015-051 Reso 201.5-052 Reso 2015-053 Reso 2015-054 It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-049 ordering the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District (Citywide LLMD). 8.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-050 approving the Engineer's Report for the Citywide LLMD. C.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-051 declaring Council's intention to provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments in the Citywide LLMD and setting a public hearing for July 28, 2015. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-052 ordering the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Landscaping & Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 (LLMD No.1). E.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-053 approving the Engineer's Report for the LLMD No.1. City.ILake EW ,. Pa9.4 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 F.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-054 declaring Council's intention to provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments in the LLMD No.1 and setting a public hearing for July 28, 2015. 8) D# 14-616 Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Waiver for Fourth of July Fireworks and Approval to enter into an Agreement with Pyro Spectaculars, Inc. Attachments: Staff Report - MUNICIPAL CODE WAIVER FOR 4TH OF JULY. FIREWORKS AGRHEMENT FOR PRO SPFCTACULARS INC. June 9 2015 ATTACHMENT.__PYRO SPECTACULARS INC PROPOSAL2015 It is recommended that the City Council: A,) Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and approve purchase under LEMC Section 3.08.070F - Exception to bid procedures (When in the best interest of the City, the City Council may authorize the City Manager or Purchasing Officer to bypass the bid process required under this chapter for purchases greater than $30,000); and B.) Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Pyro Spectaculars, Inc. fora Fourth of July Fireworks Show in an amount not to exceed $35,000. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale to approve the Consent Calendar; passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, Council Member Hickman, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT. None ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None APPEALI -None BUSINESS ITEM(S) 9) ID# 14-617 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No 2015-1338 relating to the Zone Change No. 2014-01 for Meadow Ridge II attachments: Staff Resort_Second f2eadiry of Ordinance Meadow Ridge. Ordinance No, 2015-1338 Zone Change for Meadow Ridge II It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1338 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014.01 FOR 20.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOU I SIDE OF HOLLAND ROAD, EAST OF HERMOSA DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CORSON AVENUE by roll call vote. City of Lake Elsinore Paye 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation to Council to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordiance No. 2015-1338. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Council Member Hickman, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1338. Deputy City Clerk Giron read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1338, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-01 FOR 20.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOLLAND ROAD, EAST OF HERMOSA DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CORSON AVENUE. The motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Council Member Hickman, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manes NOES Council Member Magee ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 10) ID# 14-618 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1339 relating to the Annexation of Nichols Road and Zone Change No. 2014-02 Attachments: Staff Report - Second Reading of Ordinance Annexation Ordinance No, 2015-1339 Annexation Annexation 83. ZG 2014_02_ Exhibit A -_Pre-Annexa tion Zonincn 5-2.6-15 It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1339 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014.02 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 83, by roll -call vote. Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation that Council waive further reading and adopt Ordiance No. 2015-1339. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Council Member Hickman, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No, 2015-1339. Deputy City Clerk Giron read the title of ORDINANCE NO, 2015-1339, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-02 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 83. Deputy City Clerk Giron took the roll -call vote and the motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake EW wro page 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 11) ID# 14-619 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1340 relating to the Zone Changes to the Diamond Specific Plan Attachments: Staff Report -Second Readina of Ordinance Diamond Specife Plan Ordinance No. 2015-1340 Diamond Specific Plan Exhibit A - Diamond SPA 1 - CC Excerpted Redlined DSPA It is recommended thatthe City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1340 ORDINANCE N0. 2015-1340 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN by roll call vote. Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation that Council waive further reading and adopt Ordiance No. 2015-1340. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1340. Deputy City Clerk Giron read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1340, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN. Deputy City Clerk Girdn took the roll -call vote and the motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 12) D#14-620 Adoption of the FY 2015-16 Annual Operating Budget Attachments: OPERATING BUDGET FY2015-16 STAFF f2EPORT v1 Resolution 2015-16 City.Operatiny Budget 2015 16 Preliminary Oneratina Budaet Pinal Ail Other Funds Summary Resolution 2015-16 Authorized Positions Authorized Positions Schedule Resolution 2015-16 Gann Limit 15-16 Gann Limit calculation It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO, 2015-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FY 2015-16 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING THE CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN THE APPROPRIATIONS; and B.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF City & Lake Elsinore Paye City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS; and C.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2015-16 AND SELECTING THE POPULATION AND INFLATION FACTOR ACCORDINGLY City Manager Yates stated on May 26, 2015 the City Council held an in depth budget workshop, Administrative Services Director Simpson will provide a presentation on the City's operating budget and will provide a presentation of the CIP budget to Council at a subsequent meeting. Administrative Services Director Simpson provided an overview of the annual operating budget process and staffs recommendation to Council. He reviewed the revenue and expenditure impacts; sales tax revenues; property values; continued population growth in the City; and improved unemployment rate. The general fund revenues have grown to $38,126,132 and are lower than the appropriations funds. Director Simpson also reviewed the expenditures and explained that the City is increasing its staffing level by three (3) new positions to replace high paid consultant positions and adding 14 part-time positions to the recreation department. He spoke regarding the deficit highlights from the Budget Workshop and stated the final budget will include the patrol hours, the number of sworn positions, and the ratio with a five year trend, The fish stocking funds will be increased to $25,000; under community support the City funded $6,000 for AED (Automated External Defibrillator) from the current year; and funding for holiday lighting on Main Street has also been included. The economic development budget will be presented at the next City Council meeting for a contract for an economic development consultant to prepare an economic development plan. Darren Hoopingarner, Temecula resident and Deputy District Vice President for Calfire Local 2881, spoke regarding safety concerns for firefighters and the community if fire station 10 is cut from the budget. Mr. Hoopingarner explained that the primary function of the fire engine from station 10 is to fight wildland fires, not muncipal fire fighting. He stated if the City is going to cut the fire engine from station 10 and rely on a fire engine from Calfire to respond to emergencies then the City will be relying on AMR (American Medical Response), paramedics or another engine throughout the City. Calfire resources can't always be relied upon because their mission is to fight wildland fires. Mr. Hoopingarner stated that cutting that resource in the City will make their job harder to protect the residents and firefighters. He hopes that the Coucnil will reconsider cutting station 10 and look at other options. City Manager Yates stated that this matter was discussed at length and that the City currently has four (4) fire stations. The recommendation was to unfund Station 10 and utilize state resources when it is appropriate and when it is not appropriate, the City will utilize the three (3) fire stations in the City. The goal for the City is that the Council has set a course of economic development and proceeding in a manner to bring in businesses, jobs, and resources that the City needs to facilitate City programs as it moves forward. The recommendation to unfund Station 10, also includes tracking of call volumes, and observe response times. The City's goal is not to put anyone in danger, but to put the City in a good financial position and review this item annually. City of Lake Elsinore page 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Mayor Manus stated that the response times were adequate to unfund that station and set aside the funds from that station for this year. Mayor Manes stated that it was a difficult choice. Council Member Magee thanked City Manager Yates and Administrative Services Director Simpson for their diligent work on the the budget; the Budget Sub -Committee for an orderly presentation of the budget; and Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale for serving on the Public Safety Committee and making difficult recommendations concerning police and fire funding. He stated this budget maintains the City's reserve levels, reinvests in the City through enhanced econornic development, retains Council's commitment to public safety and sets aside over 49% of the City's budget for police, fire and animal control services. Council Member Magee stated the City needs to rely on the leadership and good judgment from the Board of Supervisors in partnership with professional labor unions to allow us all to move forward in a financially sustainable manner while maintaining a commitment to public safety. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Hickman, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-055 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting the FY 2015-16 Annual Operating Budget and Establishing the Controls on Changes in the Appropriations, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Hickman, Council Mernber Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manus NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-056 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Revising the Schedule of Authorized Positions, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manes NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resulutiun No, 2015-057 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Establishing the Appropriations Limit for FY 2015-16 and selecting the population and Inflation Factor Accordingly, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manes NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 13) ID# 14-621 Award Construction Contract to Highland Construction. Inc. for Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Canyon Road - CIP Protect No. 4432 Attachments: Award of Construction Contract for Deceleration Lane Southbound Decel Lane 115 RR Canyon A mnt Hyhland Construction Inc - Bid Proposal It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Highland Construction, Inc., in the amount of $858,554.50 for the Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Canyon Road; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; and C.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and D.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. Interim Public Works Director Smith introduced Project Manager Solanki, Senior Engineer Tech McCalmont, Kristie Stelle, Vice President of Operations with Highland Construction, Inc., Wael Faqih, President of Falcon Engineering Services, and Tariq Malik, Construction Manager with Falcon Engineering Services, and Dennis Green, President of Green Com Inc. Director Smith provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation to Council. Director Smith explained the deceleration lane improvements will provided additional capacity and help reduce traffic in the area. He also reviewed the project schedule and stated the construction will begin after July 4th and be completed by early October. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Highland Construction,lnc., in the amount of $858,554.50 for the Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Canyon Road; authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City or La ke Elsinore Page 10 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Yates introduced new Fire Chief Shawn Newman. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Hickman announced that he will not be in attendance at the next City Council meetng and wished everyone a happy 4th of July. He stated that the new skate park on Palomar Court looks beautiful. Council Member Hickman thanked the Girl Scouts for the flags they provided at the Memorial Day Ceremony. Council Member Johnson thanked the Finance Team, Mayor Manes of the Budget Sub -committee, Community Services Director Skinner, Parks and Recreation Team, and Project Manager McCarthy for their hard work. She welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City. Council Member Johnson stated that this Girl Scout Troop is what makes the residents proud to live in Lake Elsinore and commended Troop #1124 for using their funds to replace flags that were used at the Memorial Day Ceremony. Council Member Johnson announced the the Art Show on Friday, June 12th from 2:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. and Saturday, June 13th, from 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Council Member Magee recognized the new renovations at Machado Park, Summerlake park, Yarborough Park and Serenity park and thanked Community Services Director Skinner and Interim Public Works Director Smith for getting the project delivered. He stated that the parks are beautiful and it is a job well done. Council Member Magee thanked City Manager Yates for the budget process and commended Administrative Services Director Simpson and the finance staff. Council Member Magee recognized the Historical Commissioners, Historic Society, and staff for the historical recognition event. Mayor Pro Tisdale stated that Lake Elsinore is the only city in the past three (3) years that has spent over $3 Million on a fire station and $1 million on a fire engine, so was hard to bare the criticism. He asked children to refrain from playing at the skate park at Serenity Park until it is completed. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale pointed out that the deceleration lane would not solve the traffic problem at Railroad Canyon Road. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City and wished Council Member Hickman a Happy Birthday. City of Lako CW".rc Pagc 11 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Mayor Manus wished Council Member Hickman a Happy Birthday and welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City. He thanked Council Member Johnson, City Manager Yates, Administrative Services Director Simpson, Fiscal Officer Buckley, and the finance team for their work on the budget. He stated that it was his first year participating in the budget process and he was excited to see the additional revenue come in and that they had to make some tough choices during the budget process. Mayor Manes stated that the deceleration lane project at Railroad Canyon Road will get worse before it gets better and asked the public to be mindful and patient during the construction process. Mayor Manes spoke about Facebook comments regarding the Police Department and stated that the comments were supportive and this Council supports the Police Department and thanked them for the service they provide. Mayor Manes announced the Machado Park Ribbon Cutting and invited the public to participate in finding a name for the whale located in the play area; the Annual Kids Fishing Derby held on June 6th was a good event and thanked everyone involved ; the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail Ribbon Cutting on June 6th and stated that additional linkages are being considered to extend the trail. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Manes adjourned the meeting 8:18 p.m. to the Regular City Council meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. Steve Manes, Mayor Diana Gir6n, Deputy City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 12 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 2) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-641 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92539 w Jake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed ou 611812015 CITY OF i^ LADE5- 1LSIAOKE DR(iAM E1(TRIME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT— MAY 2015 Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. Discussion The Investment Report is a listing of all funds invested for the City as of the date shown on the report. Prepared By: Nancy L. Lassey Finance Administrator Approved By: Jason P. Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Investment Report for May 2015 CITY OE ��� LADE LLSINORE 1DREAM EXTREME. 404 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT MAY 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2015 BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANG BOOK ACTIVE ACCOUNTS BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE Bank of America - General $ 14,646,565 $ 527,689 $ (1,149,495) $ 14,024,758 Bank of America - Payroll 13,091 - (510) 12,581 Bank of America - Flex Benefit 35,893 - 35,893 Total Active Accounts 14,695,549 527,689 (1,150,005) 14,073,233 INVESTMENTS City Local Agency Investment Fund 11,824,543 - - 11,824,543 City CAMP Investments: CAMP Pool Account 58,183 - - 58,183 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 10,793,007 - - 10,793,007 Municipal Bond / Note 290,464 - - 290,464 Federal Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligation 136,350 - - 136,350 Federal Agency Bond / Note 7,154,301 - - 7,154,301 Corporate Note 8,763,808 - - 8,763,808 Certificate of Deposit 2,175,000 - - 2,175,000 Housing CAMP Investments: Housing CAMP Pool Account 22,044 - - 22,044 Housing U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes 2,217,509 - - 2,217,509 Housing Municipal Bond / Notes 30,084 - - 30,084 Housing Federal Agency Collateralized Mortgage 25,250 - - 25,250 Housing Federal Agency Bond / Notes 1,039,303 - - 1,039,303 Housing Corporate Notes 1,452,808 - - 1,452,808 Housing Certificate of Deposit 200,000 - 200,000 Sub -total Investments 46,182,653 - - 46,182,653 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (LAIF) 3,406 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (CAMP General) (72,383) Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (CAMP Housing) (29,370) Total Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 per GASB 31 Total Investments Cashier Drawers #1 & #2 City of Lake Elsinore Petty Cash Fund TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS (98,347) 46,084,305 - 3,406 (72,383) (29,370) (98,347) 46, 084, 305 $ 60,779,854 $ 527,689 $ (1,150,005) $ 60,157,538 300 1,000 $ 60,158,838 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on November 12, 2013. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Jason P. Simpson June 16, 2015 Director of Administrative Services Date CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND TRANSACTION SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH ENDING MAY 31, 2015 Interest Rate Purchase Date 0.290% Daily Beginning Balance Net Increase/(Decrease) $ 15,124,543 $ (3,300,000) Maturity Rate 24 -Hour Ending Balance $ 11,824,543 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF MAY 31, 2015 FUND NO FUND NAME AMOUNT 100 General Fund $ 10,657,084 101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 81,316 104 Traffic Offender Fund 82,968 105 Misc. General Project Fund 1,263,642 106 Affordable Housing In Lieu Fund 21325,724 107 Developer Agreement Revenue 1,096,471 110 State Gas Tax Fund 1,279,781 112 Transportation Fund 689,884 114 SB 1186 CAS Program Fund 3,734 115 Traffic Safety Fund 284,048 116 City Hall -Public Works DIF Fund 934,986 117 Community Center DIF Fund 380,114 118 Lake Side Facility DIF Fund 734,235 120 Camino Del Norte DIF 36,385 121 T.R.I.P.-2014A 562,208 130 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Fund - City-wide 20,771 135 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Fund - Dist. No. 1 370,654 140 Geothermal Fund 19,517 155 CSA152 -- N.P.D.E.S. 112,557 160 PEG Grant Fund 18,141 201 Street C.I.P. Fund 97 205 Traffic Impact Fee Fund 3,173,331 211 Storm Drain C.I.P. Fund 3,557,470 221 Quimby Park C.I.P. Fund 172,353 231 Library C. 1. P. Fund 1,617,454 254 AD 89-1 Railroad Canyon Rd. Improvement Fund 126,253 332 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area B, Summerly 107,099 342 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite Service Fund 1,315 344 CFD 2005-2 Alberhill Ranch Services Fund 106,573 345 CFD 2003-2S Improvement Area D, Canyon Hills 379,640 346 CFD 2014-1 Southshore Debt Service Fund 61,810 347 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area A, Summerly 143,596 348 CFD 2003-2 Improvement Area C, Canyon Hills 81,966 350 CFD 98-1 Summerhill Debt Service Fund 973,086 352 AD 86-1 Debt Service Fund 627,992 354 CFD 90-2 Successor RDA Debt Service Fund 1,743,835 357 CFD 2003-2 Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 613,565 366 CFD 2005-6 City Center Townhomes Debt Service Fund 165,606 367 CFD 2005-3 Summerly Debt Service Fund 117,992 368 CFD 2006-2 Viscaya Debt Service Fund 375,042 369 CFD 2004-3 Area 1 Rosetta Canyon Debt Service Fund 855,889 371 CFD 2005-1 Serenity Debt Service Fund 480,422 372 CFD 2005-2 Alberhill Ranch Debt Service Fund 1,237,489 1 of 2 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF MAY 31, 2015 FUND NO FUND NAME 373 CFD 2005-5 Wasson Canyon Debt Service Fund 374 CFD 2005-4 Lakeview Villas Debt Service Fund 375 CFD 2006-4 Tract No. 30698 & 32129 Debt Service Fund 376 CFD 2006-3 La Strada Debt Service Fund 377 CFD 2006-6 Tessara Debt Service Fund 378 CFD 2006-8 Tract No. 31957 Debt Service Fund 382 CFD 2006-9 Trieste Debt Service Fund 384 CFD 2003-2 Area B Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 385 CFD 2004-3 Area 2 Rosetta Canyon Debt Service Fund 386 CFD 2007-4 Mekenna Debt Service Fund 387 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite Debt Service Fund 388 CFD 2007-6 Holiday Inn Debt Service Fund 390 CFD 2003-2 Area C Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 392 CFD 95-1 City Center Debt Service Fund 393 AD 93-1 Debt Service Fund 394 CFD 2005-5 (2012A) Wasson Canyon Debt Service Fund 604 Endowment Trust Fund 605 Public Improvement Trust Fund 606 Mobile Source Air Polution Reduction Fund 608 Trust Deposit & Pre Paid Expense Fund 617 Successor Agency Housing Fund 620 Cost Recovery System Fund 631 Lake Destratification Equipment Replacement Fund 650 CFD 2003-1 Law & Fire Service Fund 651 CFD 2006-5 Park & Open Space Service Fund 652 CFD 2007-1 Law & Fire Service Fund 653 CFD 2009-1 Parks & Lighting Service Fund 654 CFD 2003-2S Fire Service Fund Total Pooled Cash & Investments 2 of 2 AMni JNT 55,796 45,316 17,693 22,661 10,011 47,168 31,443 1,055,711 1,151,068 9,181 60,395 3,788 347,091 124,587 1,040,405 288,784 10,964 861,073 247,789 1,549,696 11, 013, 634 1,180,260 160,779 1,528,326 73,130 133,717 226,041 1,188, 234 $ 60,158,838 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS FOR THE MONTH ENDING MAY 31, 2015 TYPES OF SECURITIES U.S. Treasury Bills U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Current Balance Municipal Bond / Notes Current Balance Federal Agency Collaterized Mortgage Obligation Current Balance Federal Agency Bond / Notes Banker's Acceptances Certificates of Deposit Current Balance Current Balance Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Commercial Paper Medium Term Corporate Notes Current Balance Repurchase Agreements DIVERSIFICATION MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE 0.00% UNLIMITED 28.17% UNLIMITED $ 13,010,515 0.69% UNLIMITED $ 320,548 0.35% 40.00% $ 161,599 17.74% UNLIMITED $ 8,193,604 0.00% 40.00% 5.14% 25.00% $ 2,375,000 0.00% 30.00% 0.00% 15.00% 22.12% 30.00% $ 10,216,616 0.00% UNLIMITED Reverse Repurchase Agreements 0.00% 20.00% LAW (Local Agency Investment Fund) 25.60% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 11,824,543 CAMP - Pooled Sweep Account 0.17% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 80,227 TOTAL 100.00% $ 46,182,653 Note: Local agencies are only eligible to purchase medium term corporate notes that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation (S & P). If a security falls below "A" by both rating agencies, then PFM Asset Management LLC will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. The CAMP Portfolio Summary and Statistics shows the credit quality held by the City's investments. *No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies. *Totals include the Housing CAMP Portfolio. r c 0I�I c o ti N p O h W N O N M OJ V n � � O � M �O 1l1 N .r E �o -7 n n 0 N N N q N N V+ > C C 7 �. o o � y o5 9 N m m n m� l0 OJ M ma 6 o c C v m m v N d O : C C C L J N O � O h N O Ll) V O E O O �D O O i0 O ei M l0 OJ M ro r � vi C 9 y N a V a �tiy� N E O C 9 y G1 pCj G j O la y C C •N d O d O C V •� O Nd c 00 V U : Z u a 0 Z W N m v � o ry m ry iv m� o r`oi M R N Ol M OJ OJ OJ O tD � N iD N V1 V .N.. C00 M t T n ti N O O r O V O N N N th pJ ip iD O 1n O� N N to W O O i0 O O i0 y rn io io m M N ro J M m m m m s O� O U N N �p O N � W � � C O O ¢ C 01 o E Y uNl d v u v ¢ V a U � rYCr � y 10 U N tO W � v N jp N C O � p U K YI E V N U) O O C C aQooUMM � v v d z �' °i d d u0U m m 0 O O C C J O J v v OC) a V a �tiy� u Y H Y a 'a c a a E 3 rilO O t a CL v O 0 o u a m 0 F M v ro m v v, n r u;oo ao;� i M N N N a m r i rn m d o c h vl N N < --i WP •-I PE i ui � V of u ! o r of r 0 0 o O o< 0 0 0 0 0< aoo oocc oC oS SS o o ui ui vi u m 0 F M v -I r .i pJ OJ V m O Cf N M OJ Ol M C' OJ OJ M O m Ill 0f C1 O O m Ill M L!1 M . \D Ol O vl N Ol O V i0 Ol V lO I� T M OJ M vl Cl W T vl V t0 OJ V V !� vl .i O ti ti N O ti� N 0 �' M N OJ O N O N O ti O� O N 0 1p O N N ti M M O OJ h ll1 O C M O Ol OJ I/t O Vl O O Ill O O O O O W Vl O Vl O d- 1p O lfl lD O V Ol )O Ol M Vl l0 N h I� In n N O O Il) M O R t\ M N Ol Ili O N N Ol Vl Ol h �O N Vl O I� N N W O In O M N pJ pl M Ol Ol O V It) M V N CO lO O C0 OJ � N N N T V' OJ V' Ol Ill V N Ill Vl O N I� n W T M N V O O �1' O h O N W OlOl n Ill O Ilt IO OJ Ol vi o M � rn w Iri � o� vi �o N vi ri � o o N v vi o vi v vi � vi � ro ro N o rc o In In n ry w n m r� n n m o vl o vl n In � io 0 o v N o 0 M N Vl M f� Vl M n N R Ol r Vl N h N n N Ill N Vl n N OJ h N M N O w K W E 0 Z u 0 ° O !Y Z Z OU Z ¢ m z O O U O Q E J U d u r a aKE a YwSH2a W'z gWF a zN za z OM G mt/1 mIOUo HKz UQIZi In Uwl U yx O Ow x° p 2: u w z uuuz w raOO.wrwnnouz f�uu <o^ 00 oQLD KD > ° O m>° KZWU > JJ w uw O Y u a7: ¢¢Gw Ow¢xO Q l ZQ QUU U 0 7 x oavLLW3i 0 O O O O .y i H tt V Ln N O Y o P o O W M o V) a Vt N O N Y= N V1 IRpP VOj _ IO O Ny P W P N Ip I(1 O V1 I� V 0 Vl 1� n N h h (\ O V1 P V1 O P M !i N IO n O t0 P n O In N ti c� G C C w N OI h N V o N T N n m m In m P IR o rn V1 .V III O n N P W h W OJ " P n M O n OJ U O1 Q .r L LL Q% y lD O [Y IO N vt P P OJ W N Ol H OI N m W O y Y lJ W W M N O M P P W Ill N h VI N ip Q M " Y f`c O In m n m N l0 In o O V1 N Ol P Ol tp W IO M Ill M O V Vl P I: p� O P IO 1p OI C W � n IO n � 2 V P ID M n M W vl P Ill Ol N OJ Ol " v Y_ •L' d .P. .moi ti r .Pi M .�-+ ti .Pr ti � � � .�-� U d Q O N O N O O O M O O O M N W .. O N ti N ti ti N M M ti ti ti ti � Vl M h Ol Ip O N .P-1 N N N .Pv N O W 1p O N > C N a N N N N N N N N N N N N N Qo. + + + + + + + + + + -t• �+ d D'. o 0 0 0 0 00 0 o O o 0 0 cm ,,,W.,; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R } y o a o 0 0 0 0 $ o 0 0 0 p q o o O o 0 0 0 0 o ru II-_I. o o n o o n r n o o C �: P 41 Ip M W M W Vl P N VI M o l' W' d M N N N N N N N N N W= U) OJ CO W W W CO 4] OJ W N W N OJ N W N OJ N .. W,! U N m ti o N rn eNi o .Ni m ti m ti m .N-I m ti m ti m N rn ti m N rn ti m N Y ".. Z O -. W' 0 0 0 0 � W � O UI N V1 N V1 l� VI Ul (/1 O N 1/1 N VI N V1 V1 � W O W W O 00 j o 0" a" o o i•••f LL > > o r Y o r > o Y > o r > o r y o> r o r o L Q W T W ti W M W MO W" W o W h W N W" W M W M W M WK O W r1r Ln in Y o 0 rn o N0 yv ^ o _ N A � T m A N m a N O m m m D i O m m w, W c : T O a O m c � v �D h � E � 0 N o p LLJ' o m m e O v 0 i O W O N m d N N o i Q M q in Y o 0 rn m O N M V O N� A N m a W 7 �p p h a m m D :.:LU O m r w, W U O T O n O m N O v �D h � E � 0 N o p LLJ' o m m e O v 0 N �1U�:_ W O O M Go V) NW n O ti W J a 7 M ~ � �@ d ti ti m N W mm A N N O m N F F o I n o 0 � 0 e it a ry K LL IT 9 u 0 u a Q + a W O a ,c z O O a> > H g o CM LL 0 0 W O W ro q in o o 0 rn m O N N M O N� N N m a W N a O rr :.:LU U m m n O O n O m b o v �D h � E � 0 N o p LLJ' o m m e O C G 0 N �o O V h Go N NW n o ti ^ J a 7 M ~ u O N W vu W� ^ m y F F o I n o 0 � 0 ry K LL IT 9 0 0 W O O O O q in o o 0 rn m O N N M O N� W fa O a O N a O rr F w o o n r n O O n O m b o v �D h � rn � 0 N o p O ~ n o 00 O o 0 ,-I �o O V h Go N NW M ^ O U N ^ a N M H Q M N N .tea ti o 0 rn m 'I OQ O M O N� W fa O O O N O O rr F w o o n m n O O +R o H 6 6 N b � n ro � v'I M N 0] yN � V � M O M N N,m p� M N � N G .tea ti o 0 O N M OQ O N M � N� n fa O M ti ti N 0 v � F w o o n y' O O +R o W 6 6 �D h m rn m O O o p O o 0 o 00 p o 0 p �o O V h Go n ON M ^ O U N W � a N W N b � n ro � v'I M N 0] yN � V � M O M N N,m p� M N � N G m m o 0 O O M OQ O N M M � N� n fa o M ti Z o O m M O 0 \ M F w o o n y' M +R o W Z\ 0 0 �D h m rn m O O o 0 0 0 O o O .. O NN �o O V h Go N b � n ro � v'I M N 0] yN � V � M O M N N,m p� M N � N G O m o 0 VN M OQ O N M W Q n m o o M ti M M M M N d N OJ r O M OQ Q Q n m o o vi o M M M ri 51, M OQ Q Q n H ti H M M M M M M +R o Z\ Z\ 0 0 �D h m rn m O O o 0 0 0 O o O .. O NN O V h O N 6 ON M ^ U N U N W � a N W Q Q M ei 0 0 W O O O O H ti ti ti 0 0 W O W ro O� O O O O Q Q Q 4 Q 6 Q Q Q 6 p o 0 0 00 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 '1 51, N OQ Q Q H ti H M M M M M 51, N .moi VI N U1 N N +R o Z\ Z\ 0 0 y o m o m o ¢ m O o O .. O N N N N 6 ON M ^ U N U N W � M W� Q Q Z' 51, C Y l0 O N OL t00 CD LO epi Io11 Lr? 16 P O O M M L n Cl . C W W LLq N N N Y ti n m a N Ln O� O N O vi LA In N ,y yj Ol T p U 1� V1 LO IR LO O O O O W � T N O T O N ., Q n P OL OL O+ M � VI M M LO h M LD P N N LD T Lp O V1 N 1!1 M N � W N O i OJ LO O N h Omi �. � f� W VM U C m m O ti O N W � LO P N o OJ M O� N OJ P N a M N N n � Y r Y 1� O O O P p h N n ry M .r .y N O O OM OLf� LO O e^1 Vl O O OM Tt V C N pI p V W O O N 1� OM O O n M O N rl O N O M H Q P N % n C� GI O N M P O O pi M N I Lp tp Ln M W n L W .Na .Mr N .Pr .Pi .P -i .Mi .Ni N ti W � M M P h C \ LO N Vl epi � Vl N� LI T C a o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 f0 m a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 C 0 o o 00 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o h P O O O CD LI; N n O N O I� O O L i Ill N h ay' M uj `y 0' In LLJ' UJ M M M O ui Y ti ti W OJ W O� i0 � W W n h n c t ,t' ,a O F m w o w o w w w w o p N N Z 00 U jp o F o .. o I- o o o O J ..,.�; LU u pz e O o O O Wu o C o z^ J z Po J z^ J z N z N m o ~ z o 0 m y^ Q o s OJ OJ OJ O O Oz h OJ Q M O N F--• �t M M N M F U-. F 9 Q N W oN W W N W W N Q N T U N U oN W N ON 2 oN �K Q p pwD z0 ZO ZD z0 2D �0 u ap �� �p �� tt❑ ��IIIIIIII��� vi o 0 o m Q M P N R V �D ti Cl P fl V h h O W lc� v°ii ro v m '. L O IOI1 N O V N P t/i O P p M N Q E m c OM W O OJ O O V O V d; N P O O � V V N o d O W V lli OJ P M O C v (+ a s : `o W ri r 16 m v V rl P N I P M P V1 W O� P P V 0 N P M ti 0 n T � 4 o 0 0 rn � o O 10 O N O c0 0 O in M O T C N N In O H O N O W P P N O O L U3 P P O U) OJ P P V W y� V N M M N N M V IA W W ti H ti ' d H a A m N O O O O O O O O O 0 N � N N M N N 1 0 N Q Q Q Q Q ¢ 6 Q 6 Q 6 6 ¢ Q U V Ul Q ¢ ¢ a a a ¢ a a 'O N ¢ Z': C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 v, LL L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = N 6 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o O 0 00 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o o o vi o 0 0 � 0 0 vi o vi ON o ti V c� V� V N M M rl N R M ti M L LLJ O N P M CO OJ Qm O O LL P O W= :. W: N W P W V M Lu O\ vii O N M .o ro w ro ¢ m Q .7. ti O c Ln' A O In d l0 W m G o a' J N r� O ry v Z in O :n ` __ W oN 0o 'ao m , v v m o u� �0 50 50 0� N o0 0o •' Y::. f d N Z Z ON ON O N O O ON j\` U ON O NO OU N Mw LL... K W N N 6d W U 1 u 11 y N =�aomoMo�o�o=o�omom000a�=o Ln 0 N ti r .n vl o o In o m M m m ri N .v m ri N OJ M N �y M jp i> rvMi Cr T N V1 N M N a d' V1 1I1 M 10 N .i M � N P � N C C N W d i0 ✓ N N 1111 W IR n ti lO o O O O O YI d IR oM 0U N c n .y O In vi O M E n N m ry m v 1O rr,1 vl vni of ri m N O W v N O N o o CO ? m o IR .moi (� 00 N N O VI 00 r^ O O O t0 G N Ol O Vl vii iD aI N o W ti Ip n n O O o O o O O o O N N yl L V N fel OI It> r ti O Il) Vl I(1 m m O 10 V 1/1 � vl N M N � �L d N ti N m M In N ti In � m u O d ti ti � In � M ti M H r N �1� N � e CL a a z z ufolrn a + + E �:. y a a a a ¢ a a a 0 o p o 0 0 0 lkp = a o 0 z o o 0 a 0 o o 0 G 00 o 0 0 0 o O f1 �0 n L11 n o vi vi o O o vi n In 0 0 C v . V1 In N n n M o N vi � vl V n V1 V1 r I(1 ui o � ei p'I W Ozi ¢¢ a N LL o N Q u u Q X fA LL J ry W IA n n r m N to O v m m Ill U W: U u Lu z a 3 E O' c c L Q O O N z N N ON N N } O F O O Z O C Z M vl W m O O 1/1 ti ti } p LLl '" p Ip✓ J.. z W:. v p¢ o a Z o a z o o A a zn W v U u ti LL o In ti 17 ou m o z o z o F e u I^ O o o N U ( n an .`1- z 8 o G o o� ti N vl 0 ul Q N w u'i In N rl LL o 0 o 0 O O 0 (. I G U U p W 0 Z p p p } ❑ V O Mill U E F- W F- W F w H 'S p H U N m p ¢Q H ¢mO 0 O F- u ¢d N U O ¢ p M p O p H O Iq S O V p a' p Z p VI f U H 0 M b U N N � 1R bt � O C w v m y m LY N Yn N M N O E � Ill � O O LL d y U b C a M a Y f O F V O N N N .+ n 10 •Of O b Ifl m .i M P iR L y � V � � O v h W ' 0 d D y N id C G •" 7 p � � s m L Z! m m 01 U- e C A II ui � Q: w J^ N U W � I^ Lu V J ti I Y Lu O 0 f O H U f Jl LU`u p o 17 W j LL O N N nCy v I �� � �-' W N IILL111ItI`1111 Ln Y a G f C LK N vl of N Ila Vl V1 n Q� ry n N ry v� In M O N N P N O m m M O � i• Ip O 1` � M n .-� .4 n (p ✓1 of W P W o N Lq O M N N N OJ Ill lO ° M m o c_ C w y GoO M N ti ti n p] N Vl O O N Vl LO i 7_ O Y •-� ti ti N N M M M M M M V P V' P M � O d v W d 0 Ul L \ VI N N Vl �q OJ ti N V In H P N P P M lO O P 10 O Ll m V V O ti O P O O co co M W Vl m W J l0 N Ol 1p N W P N n l0 O Vt n P N p� O 1p O] P O N N N a N � a \ •J 0` P O P P O� O lO 1p P ti O] P W T P Ip ° N 16 OJ N P O V1 N OJ M N m O INI1 m ti 1I1 y L• P n N ` Ip n N n .r N � C O D vl �% O 0 O In O M OJ P I(1 O O O Vl O O n n y p T O O N OJ lO L!i n n N n M Vl VD n M n m M M O l0 n O LI! N [O o V N O N M 1p VI In N � C O OJ Ol P P wl i0 n M 'y •-.� OJ n OJ N M O+ W N pJ VI P Vl V1 N T O N �} W p N �1� y �"� y N ^ •'� Ol W � N m VI N l0 O N N .-a N N O+ n P N Ill Vl N Vl 1(1 10 N � '.. L U N •U 00 O O pl T o 0 o m rn ti O ti 'i n CO pJ ti N o 0 0 o o o O+ of o m CL z L � M LL LL I.%'. d K to J 6 g S J J 6 6 I uj '.' w w O W G 4 w w w rOr V m U o f E f U m U m U z z a a U Q 0, 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 0 00 0 0 0 p 0 0 00 0 O O 0 0 c0 0 0 0 0 c0 O O O O p O O O C O J 0o vi o o o o n a o vl P VI l0 M W M vi vi o vi o o o n n n to n o o m m W Vl V In Vl M O O Gw: I M p O aO LLI 'a 2' Q N O M M H ro W W W W W NM N N N N N m u U u U W W OJ W ro W N W W ro N N N N N N N N M 2 '. ? W Ql W O] O] N W W W W W W W W W W r~ V rn rn rn rn m m m rn m m m m m m m m �" i w f; W H Y LL. M O OM M J • Y a O O O O O I� \ M o 11 Ol o T \ f .. ' V1 O V1 \ J U:.. Q V O Vl W O VI W VI O IA O N N Vl N U1 VI � UI O Ul N Vl � Vl N VI O Vl O O VI p F \ I > \\ O W W O W O W 1p W 1p r r r r rr M W W N W Ir) W 1p W W W O W O n W O W r r r r r r r r r a a° o'"opo'"o•"o�o�o"o•"o'"o"o•"o"'o'"o'" z� z ti z ti z N z ti z ,My z ti z N z z� z o•" o z �` z N z N z ti Z N �' (,;�„• > f' � > o Y > o> > o> •Py ,P_, > o> Y o> o Y o T o> > > o> p 2' N R' N � \ p_' N p� N p• N d' N p_' N p' N p� \ � N p� N [[ \ p_' N d' N K N t N fn M N O I/1 M VI Vl V1 I/1 VI Ul VI UI V1 Vl M ` M M M .y O Vl ✓I M IA O7 s O1 OR O O N o N O L Q o N N M N N M O+ T 3 N M ryl '1 N N N N N N N M Y N rNi r�i o o ry ry m m rn N ~ 4 C i O % .Na N M M N N roMi H N N U � L � � d W D N % Vl N P h M (� O M O M ^ y in In H VI v O G 7 Q ti W O M rl N ..r m OI O� N O f� % P O+ N '+ Vl N O N N N M W C H �- C Y? r N P V vt \O N 111 N Iq O N N L M NW N yl {!� m ✓1 �O O N M W rl N .➢ d" N n O M V1 O % O m M N 'V m O 1%Il lO N N M O 1n 1I P O o rn o 0 0 0 0 o o a m m o a` Y a O z O O O d z m ^ O Z m m u 0 o a o O o o O o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o N L o O G O o O G O o 0 0 o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O OR IO L O O z N w d rpt d Y ❑ ❑ ❑ F ❑ 2 �i W F- U � r^ u T Y vy A N N N N \ N N N N N oo !� n !� N U p ❑ m M z IA ¢ ¢ 1� Q O J ✓O�, % m o m O¢ OJ m �� a a 0 0 .-: O .'. m o 0 ,: m o m o m o O M O U~ O p O N O U V~ U O U O U O O O U ❑ U' W\ T M W N Q N¢ N W N Q N W N W N W W by O � ❑ m 0 u F ❑ u m ❑ � ❑ � ❑ � O Z ❑ � ❑ 2 ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ �oGo � LLo � �oLLa�oLLOLLo�o�oLLo�oLLo > O a W I� V Vl N P P O in N M I� M V N M N N V WV OR O O O O O O O OPi W 00 O M M o 0 M W V 1� n � r P 2 E E u g Q 0 N 4 N u U U O 0 an ¢ o O K m ro Q to in j d' o w o 1❑ ^ m l'J t7 m x x E u ❑ f M W 0 0 oW o o O o0 0 0 0 0 n m P m 0 0 0 0 o o N o O 0 0 0 � O O O O O p o 0 0 0 o O o o O O o �n vi N I� 1l1 o o O ocs I(1 O O n Vl 3 o O In vi oO 0 N Itt M ti m O w U U M z Qa w o Q a N ro N O m m O N C1 u) O O In 1/1 O I(1 1(1 OJ V O M I�} M m P 1�0 IPII � P N OJ T M IOI1 N O o e UU o o Q o o m J N Ul ~j O V N Q N Z M Z ¢ O m 1/Ol N O o V oM U oM S PO O N P P p vi N M O of W^ N tI o P V1 UI � P M N O of H VI O N N Q, O N O N n ip W O N ip t0 M T Vl In P W Vl M O y- .y N VI pn O O M W P ti O n O W w N p o ? A/ O Q .Pi O o o❑ o o Z z O❑ u v f vxi v� Y W U❑❑ o o❑ o= m Z U 0 0 o M N U o K> w Z LL O O W I� V Vl N P P O in N M I� M V N M N N V WV OR O O O O O O O O O O O O O T o 0 z � vwi vwi M Z Z Q 6 vi rn W G Z p U 2 E E u g Q 0 N 4 N u U U O 0 an ¢ o O K m ro Q to in j d' o w o 1❑ ^ m l'J t7 m x x E u ❑ f 0 o o 0 0 oW o o O o0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 � O O O O O p o 0 0 0 o O o o O O o �n vi N I� 1l1 o o O ocs I(1 O O n Vl 3 o O In vi oO 0 N Itt M N O w U U M z Qa w o Q a N ro O m O '^ O N\ o Z .Nv Z N o o N w N w U o o o F ti o F o U K o N o o M o~ o p o 01U o Y o e UU o o Q o o m J N Ul ~j O V N Q N Z M Z ¢ O m 1/Ol N O o V oM U oM S PO ¢awn m r.; a d3 mgm¢.-� M< zNvi �n¢ Qom, O O oow.:w¢ O ., ...�.: o ..0 0 14 N LL .Py a N p f N V1 K ti O O W w N p o ? A/ O Q .Pi O o o❑ o o Z z O❑ u v f vxi v� Y W U❑❑ o o❑ o= m Z U 0 0 o M N U o K> w Z LL O O VI O ❑ 0 O >i O aW aw .d-. ro M H ICY bti� t(1 Y �O OJ m ti M O T o O P 1O W W W O1 O� 1J W O O M L/1 M Q N m L � O v m o a C U O O lD l0 O] m W 01 M O M C O W L � W � O N OJ M O� m �O ro M O ti P V 1O O M d' m N V W h N O P N M p1 N N 1p QC m m P O N OJ O P N O M M P O W O V In In O] O W N O M ti ti ti f O V UL Vt O O O 1� m H W M 1I1 O '1 l — CT N P M O O N h rl M h VI Vl ti O1 W N O �4 O n VI M LI; M C N V N ti M R N Vl N M N y V n coa ^1 s U W O m T ti O m P o 01 01 1� O W U O� P 01 O1 'i ti to 01 T 00 O R � a a+ - % N 1n CL L U- W z G � < � J a z W w m` m i F m m 0 0 0 o a o o O o o O o 'L 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o c 0 � H' ". � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O o � J O. n 0 � � m n r N � n n o of � (O ,�.. V M P N :. N M N b V C f0 W W Y W Y OW d' Q O LL 1L 1/Pi W 2 I^L 1M/1 O VI h N 01 W h 1� 1O t0 h ^ N \i Z Q � 1p O P ti P ^ 1O N iO W M 01 M 1O r N m O T N O V V � V O ti w w 0 o o o o 0 0 •' O m o o z z o v1 F m p LL: c p A 1j 6 m o w o U U o m F � J o o ¢ 0 o \ a\ \ Z o e O o P o o I p o O o m- t N z .. o¢ o N o a o K F p U 0 0 -+ N 1n OU OU o -4 (7 4 ti N Q Vl N N U N O Z O w m m U 0 O �i D y F- O Q a vUi F pZ O F w F w F w F p F d vmi F u m ro 0lz: E 0 0 0 0 U 0¢ Z m u a a 0 \§ } ( \ & f 00 )� §) �� 22 C6 . e !� ci � . mi 2� 4' LL 8 ! # 10 �A �<i ® \§ / Q } ( \ & f 00 / Q a 'vr N _ � M T f (7 0 c N Ip W " a s K a c � J v C7 L V in d N V LL O Vl O O O 1' rn O n n H N O Vt O O N O ti wn CR rn p' M n P n O n to m .+ n m wl V' V' 1] O n m m v In r o $ e No i O M .y o . o 0 0 0 0 O O M O O O o c M in o n n N O L 9 h O N M Vl aY' O N OO � o o rvi OJ o O] n OJ r W OJ O V1 M a w �M co O O O O O O O N O N o N %• O O O O O O: O O O O O O O O O O R Q. d O n n C = o o e O 0 o p o O O O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 � o o ' O � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi vi o o vi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi vi o IQ n o V1 I!1 N O O VI M H N V1 •y M wl n M O Vl In N n O V' N M �O M W a V '. z::. U =) `L o LL z a € '•y .N-� � ti n ti •�-f � ti ti ti M ti N P Vl M O. P P T O M M M M M P O: P W OJ W P W n J ti O] W W OJ P n ~ ~ VI O O O O O O m O O O O O O O J. I.L: y� z�do o �zin inz v�iw�win w-�.w.�i o �J p m m\ 0 0\ O\ O W O v o o¢\ F\ o W o �, 0 0 o \ \�- Z^ Y C. Z O VI O O �� OZ Vl N 'L O m VI Q Z N J N ✓1 � VI N O Z^ �. .... •,, g..wo � coo .n w �Pgw3 �o¢ w¢m¢ w¢.ownw�n f O yM O O - O -MI.. zON". ZO N .I. ._ ONJ ON ON ON K W ✓ w UI N K d W W W W O Q N_ N j� O Q N Q O O W O U O Q, IO- O P l I W 7 W I1 W ti VI O o W l O V Z wl M Vl W V tY Wl O W O R uoEoaoro?omo�rW-ozozozozo�wo�-o J LU ` LL: O U L� O N N N N M ��• N N q U O In Vl � L L 1 1 V1 L V1 vl Vel V1 In 011\/1 vi 9 vo r 0 0 IA W w w � a a N N N y V a N n n n d Q N d J m '1 ei M N V Lq N O � p o Vf � 10 N N �^. N m n d• V � p tp F !i V1 O n ei ei ti N � H 0op .� v1 m O N N vt M n n n W N fV y In N W `° ro V1 vnf Ynf Q M � 1R N N N G u v'^i o n M n n a` a` N v o o pp o 0 p CD p p O 0 0 0 0 G 0 o O o o O O O ry � o YI vpi o O y a �n p in n w m m x x w N N ry N m m m m V O O N O r—i O \ M ~ \ M w a W N W O W Ip11 W� Y! d Z ti Z� Z N Z ti Q } o} o } p} o V n n o O� o O o Q •= n H NO p0 F � p �"• � f Ill V p O O O O O O O V N N V Ol N V NO Ol Ol O N m�y 41 �p Ip WIN O I N V i0 t0 h 1� N M m O C nj 1� n O m m vl m W l•l v) V) m I-� �6 �6 O Ih Ih Ih O r (V O � V1 O N T Ol OJ M I� Vl Ln N O V M N Vl Ol I!1 O h O h h h OJ Ol H V1 N l0 V lO O' N V N O O Ol l0 10 L f N m C O � C � W � L m a C O N L Y y O O O O O O O V OJ O OJ M ti M OVl Ol O pl W M LL O O In O O O O fi M N V n N Vl a' O Ifl W f` y_O O U) O N In O O O M V OJ Ol M OJ Ol Ol R n O O l0 N y h Ill O O ul V n tT N V OJ OJ O O M O O N 1� Vl OJ rl n W h W N OJ C O M W O O Ol n CO N � v N Ill N V � C O ip v q y v O ^ M M O � O y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L a IO Y N G W .. Y Y C U .. a CC 0 0 vI In in Yn vI vI Yn vI N Yn Yn NC. Yn Yn TL`L IlOii vOi utiND itid vNC. iNC. i.NC-i uNGi vvN iWCi iN mL> m JOo .iNC. tiaNmi ruW O OT> O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M t f d sOci 0 0o ( y �d W: 0 0 0 0 00 a d 1 a L a a a a O O O o 4 L (O m (0 l0 10 (6 10 10 !0 � 10 IO N l0 l0 10 "O 'O "O "_O _ > 1�1 1 J C v r0. .0. .�, r-o. .0. .0. .0. .0. .0. .0r O O O O LLJ: U N N N N N N viivii J y h m m m m m m m m m m m m E E E E ! r w 1rn O ON — — — N N N — N N N N N N N N N N N [r Q N � � Ln N M In Ln N Ln n LLLJ LU v y u c m m N i"-I - - N N �.. 't LL v v - - - - --� .M, --I --I --i - .'moi --I - - --, ' I v ti vl .o .o n rn rn rn of m m` of rn m m C O O .vl. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V-�.: 0 Y F ' o 0 d y . ti D � � � N ~ � o N V T O W c N I� O f � N N t0 N O � M N 00 N m O E N C LL U) 7 O S UI i =o I > =o N �a O; O O Ill O to m M O M O ti m V N O v a+ r v L O V V O M In O O O O O In O N M O A iR iO Ol W 1� U1 +Pr N N m 0 a N E O C a j O Y m G VI n G N A V N q V o� 'U •O 'o O C a V m � O U � v � E V a ZW� V In In .r m io M O N 0l h O d' m� h O 4` vl vl O r N n N .-1 111 � LI1 O !� O W N M M� d• N M y' N N N O Ol O ip O Vl N n v M O T C O W I(1 W .r O N O OJ H N m iR Ol Ill If] Ol � M v vt O Ol CO O O N r 0 O C6 p O n O M 0 M y Ol O R l0 N � .moi cl i0lr N Vl Ol pJ N � 10 Y f m C O V p� o O N I 1 M " i O a N w o v ^J a v J V O v d O Yw> vl v V v v C v o C N> N V N m W � v v> p •N V y •� Y a -o o > o 3 a ¢ m ..- y N C C L Pr.•r. f p\ E p a �, c F v rn v U ¢ 4 0 0 0 o v v 6 v a z � a a U U 0 v w 5 V 0 .�. � a p H w w w >> L w a a a u Y H Y R V) V C R C� G E 7 O O CL v N a 0 o M W N Vl O CO M o N o N _N O O O Z z N v a uI o ou o m c CO C G O a o Q C m v n a E Ii O v >o Q o Q Z P 0 Ll O LL N J :� k!'7 � I N O 0 o j V O Ip N l0 m N IO Io O Q 0 Y F. It b�� !T N N N N _N O O Z z N v a o a z o o ou o m c CO C G O a ¢ o Q C Q t n a E Ii O Y F. It b�� V7 M O O V ti N Ol O O V O O O O O N O N M O O O O 6 Ill .i O .y6 N OJ N N N H N m O m M V O V O Ol .i M O V l0 0 0 0 0 0 O V I� Ol M Ol Ol ti I� N T M M H H M O O C O Ill M M N M CO M OJ O O M Vi N OJ M V N pJ M Ol h I� ul O O OJ Ol Vl QV' M V V O llt O OJ I� h Ol N (� N V t0 vl O O O M r l0 0 T O O OCll O Ol W of ✓t Ol v o ry vi o of ui vi � o o vi ai o of o vi � � d= O IA Ln N Ill Vl Ol O M N O O N V O N L!1 N N 1� N z r O z QPQ u z a Y K Zr Y z O ¢ O F Oa Z ¢ O u m u CK li Y U> ¢ 6 O ow 0O ¢ O a a m w w u F u zm O u' t`�7 i O ¢ rr w O w¢ w 0< z u u z O p a a rO¢0 i�0O a 'DwO O ZdwYd>UUzwouu n w a zw N Z m w m 2 z u¢ w r w a¢¢ x 0¢ w In m a O F x O Z In ¢¢muuuu�l,_I�x �zvlFF»� 0 O O C O N i H It �titi� (l O M � m n N W _ N V1 M T 4J N A E m c v �n c t0 M N V n In Np M t W n N N �O N 1 N M 1p OI M ON n O d C yN VI L O V T M Q OJ N n O Oh R V M M N O p O OP 1D n .4 O O C G m h N O N P Q O O� n N n n ry ay r i a `o LL 'O Y Vl O N n ,p O N N N Vl Vl N O _ V OJ N N OJ VI N lD M C OJ O d' .y V y l0 p O O� O U S a M Y f O U O r c� n O, IO h c, V IO IR V M V o] In n O1 V N V t� 4n n j� M M V' O P t0 Iq n Ul M V' N O, O In C ,-nIli r .V- v ti M N IO Q N N ti O N O O N O N N i N . : F O O O O O O O O O O p p D N ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q ¢ 4 G¢ 4¢ O ce o p a o 0 0 0 o ln, 0 C O po po 0 o c0 p o o o 0 0 o uj N p f M Vl VI < Q O O m M 2X' m u U 1/J W LU N W OJ W . W W W W m OJ W W ;.,ci W Y; tJ LU �.., ` J: 0 0 0 W 6 W v v, n w o m o in N m ry r �n v, o in rev vi o vi o in voi m o Y Q W O r O r W O r„ W r W W r W O W M W N W Vt W O W O W W n W p O O O O O p O r O o r O r„ O r ., O r ,., O r O r ., O O O Z Z N Z Z 'y `y LL O N O W O W W M Qm M Q Q M Q Q Q ti Q Q Q c � � (Y O K O K O 2' 6' R' •-� K O 2' "� R' O K O 6' ^ p' `� 6' 2' '� :, u ro ro ro rp r❑ r❑ ro ro rm ro ro ro r rp Ij'•`I Ln O O ry '. � � N vi v •-� v O � rn �i rn ni n o ro v m N m �� pMi Ill N eai O r0 O M M : I� N Qr N Ill M M cs O OM 6 n m Or li N a, N N N 10 N f ri m � � N IyJ 'O O Ifl yr Y YI N N N M N m Or O r0 V t d N N ri roC O N m o d O O N N OR OR ti W N O M L N O LL Gl N N rn N rO W M M >• �^ I^/1 O � N N � � N N � .r ti O O N a A y Y W W 6 6 n O O Y N ,y 4 p{ p O O O o O O 14 IQ UI M m pr q N O O P M O h 10C a"� •01 P Or O P OM OJ O O ul M O u O IQ O OM W N V O OM ti W W P Or O � O N N M OM u •V IC N O O rr+ ti O O N v '^ O O O O O ti O N M ti ti ti � ti IQ IC N O O fi H O N N N O O O O N 41 C m m N N N N M N u �I tL :. + Q + dl :u Q ¢ Q a Q Q ¢ Q ¢ a ¢ 'O (7 0 M p o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ley G O o G o 0 0 0 0 ..�• a 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ct ILCV M 1' ' N uj Zy VI 2 S O O W ^moi- DJ � U) ^ 1- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a n IMiI U. . W.":... !\ M M I� M n lM/1 IMII W U N M M M M M M M r .11 w ( a Y O N UI N Vl V) N N N J �I \ \ o o 7 ¢ �Z O Oc 0 aR. +H e z Z Z Z c y F O O o O VI U"' Z Or Ln ul O m O W O m O Q W Y N o L .O 6 0 o - o- t d A VI m M`" O rn N P m .. l7 N. lj ti H ti O N y .Mr ' LL � T � T u� T ✓1 N_ N Q N Q Q N W N W N W� m ry ~ o F n w w E o N f ti E y' i y q~ w 0 z E I l � 5 G � Q 5 m V � ❑ ❑❑❑ o p ❑ z z z V u O u %❑ u ❑ O O Z O Z❑ z❑ L.i VI UI G ❑ V1 IZi ❑ (A lIL ❑ IIL O LL ❑ LL ❑ Iii ❑ < ❑ I¢l ❑ I¢Y O W Iq CP m o o m om in m o N N vMi o �O c O+ O �p o m a n O pJ O N O h O W p ti N W W op O u O N IP/1 O N 1� O OOi P m P O� IPII W Y `o LL O� W ti ti 4. P N N W 1l1 N O� ¢ w I u O � O O ti 0 1� p O Vl Vl o O o U M V P o 0i m n p W = O ul O M [Y N 1(1 Co O� O I Ih N vl f� O O 6 p Ol P T P ll' m O� P V1 OO pJ O � ~ ^'U) W •L N � ti ti .Ni .Ni .Ni .m- M � ti ti TB �1U� Vl O Vl O O O O O O O p O O QO O H O O O O O N C � M M ti Q Q N Q Q N N Q N /p 0 zf U =)LL c a H o G o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 f6 V)' y 0 o o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 c O o p o a O O o O o o p 0 0 pp O 0 p LO � vi o o vi N vi vi o I; vi n IS o 0 � o � vpi vpi o v`^i fl PP P_ T M � OQJ W O N ~ Ln' ! Q U S Q Q 2 O V M M W a O W ✓ o W� VI In N M �p Ill h 1� N O O� W h C.J W U M P OJ N Ol H P O 1�l1 O k Y: U w LU h Z Z v 3 O Z O O O O Q O 0 N Q\ p I%�... ❑. a W H _ �J N O o Q N o J N W N N O Z O � VI O O� U J O ....L.LJ O z OV UJ y\ N H N W O N o a� o p o o w o z o m QwQ v � o �, a� �o �� M � �� LL o N U 0 0 m Ln M � � Z I V) M V1 In � U ti O O� T o v N � u ti N 0 N N m V rn N O o N O� 0 O� O O o O m 0 0 A m o u o 0 U 0 o ¢ o N � (j U N Z O � m x m rn o n C =o ap M o v o H9 w o O o O N M C a N o 0 p O o S m o n c O O O o o pU o � � � � o E 0 m 0 ~ N Q ti `o W ;v d y � voi n L 1l1 N M Q M ti A.1 N Q N M � 0 O U m o m m N � v ti IW^ N p O O O VI 0 ti d 'O u ti ti N N N O O O O O 41 N C C C A 6 Q Q Y Q Q Q L. 0 0 0 a M � � Z I V) M V1 In � U ti O O� T o M ~ � u ti V 0 0 N Z o N O o N O� 0 O� O O o O m 0 0 0 6 m o u o 0 U 0 o ¢ o N � (j U N Z O � v U m rn o n N =o ap M o v o H9 w o O o O N M 'I a N o 0 p O o S Q � O O O a o 0 I V) q o O .r � o 0 V o 0 � o ti V 0 0 N � o 0 O o N 0 0 � Q M m 0 0 n ni O ti O o a N oO N mo v � m rn o n N =o 00 � N o rn M w o � n M q o N .r � o ry O a 0 0 � o 0 � 0 0 o � o N O o ul a W .+ 'I Q M ut $ .. N ni O C ti N F N oO � mo v � M VI ti n N =o 00 O N o rn M 'I a N Q � O O O c o a o � � � � o 0 0 0 ~ V ti w o � n O O o N a b o ry O O N U � c ro N o � o f � 00 O y W QZ J ti 'I Q M ut $ .. N ni O C N N F y ti N � mo v 00 VI o O N =o 00 O O O w o C� m rn m O V M N a b o ry O O N N c N a m m rn 'I M � $ a N ni O C N N � N v VI o O N O O O O O rn 'I N a9 4 W ~'. Y OJ V1 N OJ M N ON N •� n N Vi M M N O M � m Q � G n t {a y d C d � W Q v \ d. Vl O O V1 P l0 1� n n 10 P w m T .^i O n lil N � to ID W O N V N Ol r M .Mi P p N N � a I 10 U M d c N .r N UY Y O pJ O Ill O O O Ip OJ Vl N Vl O n O O T P N I� V1 O n n .-t 00 N Ill OJ O W Vl b ay' P n M P O M W P N P N pl a � l0 W OJ Vl 1� Vl Lq N ti l0 P N N N Ol Ill vl In O n N V1 OJ a+ _ `m ,mac S z L_ LL w s U �1=L i w o w a aG w E u z U m g: u u E m u m u F ., u > O O O O O O O p O �y OO O O O O O o O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O' � N M N O In O Ol n N C` n Vl V1 O M C S: rNi Lu Q O M M 11'' '' VI OJ W W W W m OJ Nw N OJ N N N N O] QJ OJ OJ N W N I� Q N -I N -I N N N N '-€W:. LU V m m m .Ni rn m .N -I m .Na rn .Ni rn .N -I rn .N -I .N -I .Ni m m -I y C U-1. � l0 h 1� r h n O] M Ol P T Ol Q• Ol �'^� ...� lllu LV Ql V W h VI V I/1 INMll VI VFI OON VfP�l VFZI O r Mm VPl OON Fo ZZZZZZZZZZ O PVl OO" O O OVZI O N _ a m Z O M LL S 41 M h In H M I- ul h M r to F In F- In F vl I- In F vl 1- vl H vl N vl �- v �-. �n v lo Io w CO o N H M O y p N m W rNi m M vi ry n � N M O M b C M `M O W > b t0 b M O O N M C� C� M O d � w D N ti u C � Q \ a+ M M M N V CN V OMi IOV q Om+ Lf 7E U p1 M N b N O V V1 a 1(1 -i C O 7 u O M lO O CJ M O V1 m m O" O m V M M P n (I) W P N v oo T io m � vl^i Oi � .moi N U' ° n IR o L n' Lli N n v IO � Of N VI o vi o m v �o M O M N n � O� � O � N vi vi ✓1 N N V Q O rl m O �/Wl 1PO I�D M O Yl Vl P M N ^, W Y u o 0 0 0 0 0 o m m o � S Y L Z L .. W C ¢ z v w Z w z 2 D o �' a ti u m a U LL m E OZ °' m n u m u d U V Q o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V7. O o 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L LEJ; 5- J,. M N U {/� LU � M O 1� h VI V1 VI I M M M M M M I M M rbi Y to Y. Z: o i� m a b .. ... n m io a ti ✓ 0 zo za zo 00 000 00 0 p~ ~ J O M n ~ U WW W w n O m O a O J J N o o m o¢ ro¢ m¢ m m m N O 0 0 .-i O .. O 0 0 M0 M 0 >p', n N o n .N. o w o u o U o U o V o w o U U n t o o r� cY 1� LL� CO H N � O H ti ti .-a .v .y ti r-+ H ti •-u N pl C N A O P t0 V 1O N O n o0 n cp n � n W W T Ll O a N C N OO P O O N N n n n cO W n �O W m m W M Y 7 O N M I N M N N M M I I W � \ H m M tp n OJ m a I O P co N vMMN ON a N � y T V N y M P M O] IPI1 lOD O c � C ui OM h ti OOi o OOi emi O O d- o n O N DJ ro O M n N p� O ♦p M Lf1 CO O Ot DJ W M O � DJ O P N OJ O V1 b 0' W vPl O� O O� MO v� W a w y y n ro-v m m o o m m � •C a o m rn o m m rn o 0 0 m f a N Y n n n Y u u S o 0 5 s w O � u > 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o 0 g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y o 0 0 o vi vi o0 O o o a o 0 0 0 o O o o 0 0 o vi G V M OJ W O P bill r T w N Y .W 7 Nj L O Vl I t O Vl O 11 W U N N W M W C OZ \ O VI O i� O t0 •y O •V M O O O O � �\ W o fA o m a W � m� O� W p a OJ z � Y Z O O O Q� � ti s�¢ •O-1 Q � N Y M O J Ol O O� U N N O ti y f1 O. 10 V ti ti m M Y �-�i O ti O H d T Q .N-' Y o 0 O .Ni O •Mi m 0 o o U o 0 0° 0 0 0 0 o N i✓ N N M N �y N \ 6 N U' N O N W N$ N (•J N T '~111x' Y ❑ N O O O N O o W' O LL O� O W O Z O Z N�\ Q O Q O � O ���I���r�� U ¢ F m x O F 2 0 1- ¢ I- I- O N p 2 p U Z p V 2 0 m 0 m p E p V p¢ O V 0 U p¢ 2 p p VI N Y a H � 'i ti m M O A ?N T VI lD O O \D _ % 11 N o p N c O .i fV o lV O� t C U y d O y � � p � W � N y J o o O M o O M N O co e{ vi O P4N O O O O lL u N O N b N t+ N M M p w lO � a 0 w O O A U N O r N o N 0 c c O N H 7 y, N Y n 10 N Oo O N o V a b i H tC N O b Y1 N LC O o o O O N N N ti Q N P O yt O C � � o 0 0 A a` � ff Y u v L 0 X N Z L .L LL V) Q c r 7 Du y J LL u Ul) ln': O O p o O O O V V W v LU U v V Vr �' r T r-� W � O O ED W y 0 W z o H P a i M•+ LL IO- N S M i m J u V \ E (7 O m V G y t p N M C d � J L � L 9 N LL N � U 1 0 o m O N •O M N O oo P oo �n op o m N o �n O N N pJ p f� h y N y O V O OJ I4 i OJ M Ip/1 M n M pN ^ V V1 V1 aD P V N O N V vt OJ 1� V vt ' W p N � .y � N i, NO �p O h p P p V1 p o OJ N 00 V1 V1 O O N of W L^' 9 V n v4 O N O Vl O N V1 •-I ON M W V In Vl M N M O N V In pJ h Q M y W C O ^ ^ o v n y O p0 O O O O O O O O 00 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o Q a V H L o o p o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o 0 0 � o op 0 0 0 o o 0 o d po o o 0 0 0 0 0 (n o 0 0 C o 0 0 o o o o o 0 o 0 G 0o vi vi : vi pp vi vi o o vi U M M M N m Q M �p Q M P: M U` l•J ('J N N N T" Oi M N P ti ff ti :. ti H ti (a ", �D O� •-1 M O P p] M M M P P O� e � � iLU z: o o m o 0 0 p 0 0 o p o 0 0 �^•-M1 o Z o O N W C � O p z H W O i7 i P Ifl Z O g W W W Q J OJ OJ '� N U1 O V1 N V1 1A � a a �p W g W� W� V! p' K N N n�// 1..� O. O O W O O U O � � � O P� N N •pd'. U O LL C 6 0 0 0 LL LL O D J p t L7.1 : H V: v M H O O LL L. O O O U O O O O O Oo M4 Ln ~ D OO O O J N is Au u u V, W w w V O O tO 10 lD lO C � O : o T J I O Of 01 \ d O yr O V LL 0 v o R M C� O M M N N M V N VI H V1 v'I i b n n FO O .- vl ei 01 m N � VI .: 4 V � ro Q n N VI N Lq {+ M V V dS V1 C oo a O M M In N A c y ti M n n a` F 7 0 o p V O o 6 0 Q N C5 o n C L' u (D � � Q W v qi w M m m C � V U O' w Z ~ oM m J W N n Wtc: o o C 1 z o o U o N v : h 00 p � L � �W/ LL J, uJ ,p i W W D O y 9 V w � G lG �O l0 1p 'i .i Ol T OJ OJ l0 W OJ N OJ O] OJ V1 V1 Ol Ol (7 M M M IO l0 cY Ol N V1 OJ Ol h O O O OJ OJ n O � N N N n OJ W I(1 N lfl N Vl 1� m m76 N O Y N � OJ N Vt Vt I� M n h r M N or cY W V1 OJ W T n Ol O O N N N N O ll O N .v 10 t m C � N W � L N Qi C O d N L Y O Y G p O O O I!1 O OJ O Ol O N N O V ip O O ON W > O O O N O Ill N ^ ^ pl M O O N O O o 6 •, Eo N M al- rNi m y v m ro v o a 0 VM N O N Vt R v OJ N M OJ N pJ O L h O v V O F v � O y y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a` 10 Y L 'C 5 e C� G Y R c O Ln u p z' LL o 0 u U 0o n _u o O O c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o E f f d v 0 0 0 0 o° c d 0 6 0 6 o d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 �. 0 d 0 d 0 d l0 N_ — co Q I L (O IO N N IO f0 (0 _N U J 2 n IO l0 !0 N (0 t0 N J.. W O S S S S S IL S S S S G GC E 0 J W' v v Y p Q O O O � Q � v v a v v v o � v v v � v •,�k L L L L s m L L L E E E 4Y4 ,�C L L S S L � J J J p J J J J N J � J � d v N V d J J UJ Of Y R N V1 Vl lf] V1 I.n I!) Ifl V1 L!1 Ill V1 Ifl I!) Ill il) W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 O O O O O l0 O f/) W N -OOn- -NOn- INIOll) LL -OOl -l) \NONn -l -l --NOl r mCCv ,OO - -NO--1 -O-Nl -NO-l - --i NO NO - - - - -OvNnl -NOvll -NOvll YGUo v i v v v v vv-NOll i }, O-1 O-1 O-Nlt � O N 9 J'S C m N M O 0 M O v N N f0 S V) m C C W w/ L C 1Y O I# O N L Y Y G O W � O E N Q C W f N � = F zlW D O Y' V C 41 C E d id i, C 7 U U a, FO T u � N � 11. G N M M n C J'S C O Y' N w/ 1Y Y I# O $ -`.. W �n zlW j Y' u C 3 � � LL. v v 67 N O U- u FO T u � N � 11. G N M M n C r t,'z, ( tilhi: i2_C Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 3) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-642 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsincre org Status: Consent Agenda File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 6118/2015 CITYOF F�� LADE LSINOZE %� DREAM EXTREME,. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF SERVICE BODY FLEET VEHICLE Recommendations Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of one (1) service body fleet vehicle to be awarded to Lake Chevrolet in the amount of $40,287.18. Background The City of Lake Elsinore has an inventory of 125 pieces of equipment, which includes vehicles, off-road equipment, multiple water crafts, and other various machinery. The City's Fleet Department is responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all vehicles and equipment within the City's fleet. Currently, the City owns two service body fleet vehicles which are utilized by the City's Public Works Department. These vehicles provide superior mobile work platforms and service versatility, which allows staff to perform their job duties more efficiently. These service body fleet vehicles allow for faster response times, because they are self- contained with equipment and materials to perform a wide variety of maintenance tasks. Discussion Recently, staff determined that the Community Development Department was in need of a new vehicle for fire inspections due to the age and condition of their existing vehicle. Currently, the Department is using a 1994 Chevrolet Blazer with more than 160,000 miles. In contrast, the City's existing Public Works service body fleet vehicles are still in great working condition and can easily be used for fire inspections. Therefore, the proposed service body fleet vehicle would be incorporated into City's fleet for use by maintenance staff in Public Works and the existing 2002 service body fleet vehicle would be reassigned to Community Development for use by fire inspection. Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle June 23, 2015 Page 2 On April 22, 2015 the City's Fleet Department provided specifications for this service body fleet vehicle to three local dealerships. Staff also advertised for bids on the City's website. Lake Chevrolet expressed an interest in bidding on this vehicle. Lake Elsinore Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep/Ram and Lake Elsinore Ford were non-responsive to the request for proposal. The bid results are list below: Lake Chevrolet $40,287.18 Lake Elsinore Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep/Ram Non Responsive Lake Elsinore Ford Non Responsive Fiscal Impact Sufficient budget is contained in the 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program annual vehicle replacement reserves (Fund 105). Prepared by: Rick De Santiago Public Works Superintendent Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Exhibit A — Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Request for Proposal (RFP) Exhibit B — Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Service Bed Lake Chevrolet Bid EXHIBIT A - REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EXHIBIT B - LAKE CHEVROLET BID CITY OI LADE L,LSII` OR E - April 14, 2015 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Lake Elsinore hereinafter referred to as the City, is inviting proposals for qualified Dealers to provide the City with the following new 2015 vehicle: a 2WD, 1 Ton (Between 9,000- 12,000 GVWR) Utility Truck. The selected dealer will be responsible for meeting or exceeding all vehicle specifications listed in the Request for Proposal (RFP). Time Schedules: The following is the City's tentative schedule for the selection of a dealer: 1. Request For Proposal Mailed: April 22, 2015 2. Deadline For Filing RFP: No later than 3:00 p.m. on May 4, 2015 3. Staff Review of Proposals/ May 7, 2015 Test Drive Vehicles: 4. Award of Purchase May 26, 2015 Prior to 3:00 p.m., May 4, 2015 an original and four (4) copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope to: Via U.S. Mail or Courier Service and Walk -In Delivery: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Administrative Services Director 130 South Main St. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Please clearly identify the package — PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE RFP — 2015 Submittal of response by fax is not acceptable. All questions technical or commercial in nature shall be directed to Rick De Santiago, Public Works Superintendent, at RDesantiago(dlake- elsinore.org. Contact with City of Lake Elsinore personnel other than those listed above regarding this RFP may be grounds for elimination from the selection process. Sincerely, Rick De Santiago Public Works Superintendent CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE 2015 • 1. The prospective dealer will be evaluated, based in part on the following criteria: 2. Dealer's ability to provide delivery of the vehicle(s) timely (see Exhibit A). 3. The thoroughness and conformity of proposal package and quality of vehicle(s). 4. Over cult of the proposal to the City, and the ability of the proposal to fulfill the City's needs. 5. Extent of manufacturer and/or dealer warranties. • ol L1 I NJ k I Eel• 1. Provide pricing on all requirements as outlined in Exhibit "A". If there are discrepancies between unit prices and extensions, the City reserves the right to clarify pricing with the affected dealers. Additionally, if a dealer is proposing above basic requirements to provide enhanced capabilities, please state these enhancements in the proposal. 2. Dealer agrees that failure on its part to list all cost components related to the purchase will not be accepted by the City as an acceptable justification to re -quote the proposal. Dealer acknowledges that the original proposal and costs provided stand. However, dealer has the option of withdrawing a proposal at any time until a final contract is executed. 3. The City reserves the right to cancel or renegotiate the purchase any time prior to an order being submitted. 4. Delivery schedules shall be part of the consideration. Time of delivery must be stated in definite terms, and must be met. If time varies on specific items proposed, the dealer shall so state the specific schedule to those items in the proposal sheet (Exhibit A). Once a dealer has been selected for award, the City reserves the right to renegotiate delivery terms based on changing situations. 5. Dealer shall provide an original and four (4) copies of proposals upon submission. 6. The City of Lake Elsinore has outlined the requirements herein in as much detail as is currently known. Please provide any exceptions, additional information, or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process (attachments are acceptable). 7. Dealer shall provide within the proposal the price for the most up to date, high quality, and state of the art vehicle as outlined in Exhibit "A". 8. The City reserves the right to negotiate terms and scope of work with the highest ranked firm. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any other dealer. 9. A final contract will be awarded to the most competitively priced and qualified proposal. Although price is of prime consideration, it is not the sole determining factor. The determination of the most qualified and most competitively priced proposal may involve all or some of the following factors: price, vehicle performance, previous experience and performance; conformity to specifications in Exhibit "A"; delivery schedule; terms of payment; compatibility, as required, other costs; and other objective and accountable factors which are reasonable. 10. The Dealer shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City of Lake Elsinore , its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees harmless from any and all causes of action or claims of damages arising out of or related to the dealer's performance under this contract. 11. The Dealer shall be excused from performance hereunder during the time and to the extent that he/she is prevented from obtaining, delivering, or performing in the customary manner, by acts of God, fire, war, strike, and toss or shortage of transportation facilities. Dealer shall provide the City satisfactory evidence that non-performance is due to other than fault or negligence on dealer's part. However, the City may require compensation for any delays determined to be caused by circumstances under the control of the dealer. Standard delivery terms should be 60-90 days of receipt of Purchase Order, 12. Any evidence of agreement or collusion among dealers acting to illegally restrain freedom of competition by agreement to propose a fixed price, or otherwise, will render the proposal of such Dealer's void. Exhibit "A" shall be signed by an authorized official of the company. By signing this exhibit the dealer is indicating that he/she has carefully read the RFP, understands, and accepts all conditions stated herein. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The City also reserves the right to select one or more dealers to provide the vehicle(s) as specified. The City will not reimburse dealers for any costs involved in the preparation and submission of proposals. Furthermore, this RFP does not obligate the City to accept or contract for any expressed or implied purchases. 4. The City reserves the right to request any dealer submitting a proposal to clarify its proposal or to supply additional material deemed necessary to assist in the selection process. 5. If an Exhibit "A" requirement cannot be met by a dealer, then the dealer should submit a "No Proposal" response for the item(s) affected. Alternate or equivalent items submitted for no proposal responses may be considered by the City, unless otherwise specified. 6. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public records upon delivery to the City. 7. Dealer is requested to provide any exceptions, additional information or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process. The attached Exhibit is a suggested list of requirements. If dealer needs to revise or make additions to the Exhibit, computer or typed alterations are allowed as long as the City format is maintained. Any questions regarding this RFP should be referred to Rick De Santiago, Public Works Superintendent, at RDesantiagoftlake-elsinore.orq. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SPECIFICATIONS NEW ONE TON UTILITY TRUCK (9,000-12,000 GVWR) FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATION NUMBER/ITEM DESCRIPTION INCLUDED COMMENTS (YES/NO) 1. TYPE Full -Size 2WD, 1 Ton Single Cab Between 9,000-12,000 GVWR Utility Trucks. 2. COLOR Exterior — White, Interior — Vinyl As Supplied With Standard Package. 3. WEIGHT Approximately 9,000-12,000 GVWR (please quote on vehicle that comes closest to this requirement in your fleet). 4. ENGINE 8 Cylinder V8 Minimum 5 to 7 Liter Engine With High Capacity Air Cleaner, & Heavy Duty Battery. 5. FUEL Standard Gasoline. 6. STEERING Power Steering w/Tilt Steering Wheel. 7. BRAKES Power Brakes. 8. TRANSMISSION 6 -Speed Automatic with Over Drive and Tow/Haul Mode or Equivalent. 9. AXLES Rear Axle Ratio 4.10 Rear Axle Locking Differential. 10. WHEELBASE Single Rear Wheels. Minimum 133.6" 11. SPRINGS & Heavy Duty Front Springs. SHOCKS Heavy Duty Front & Rear Shocks. 12, TIRES All -Season Tires Standard Rim. Spare To Match. 13. INTERIOR Vinyl As Supplied Within Standard Package. Cloth is preferred. Front — Split Bench 40/20/40 Seat, center fold down with storage arm rest. 14. WINDOWS & Standard Factory Tint As Supplied Within DOORS Standard Package. Power Windows & Locks. 15. AIR- Factory installed. CONDITIONING 16. RADIO AM/FM Stereo CD Player with MP3, Seek & Scan, Digital Clock. Interior: Standard Dome Light. 17. BUMPERS Front and Rear Steel Bumpers, Painted or Chrome Or As Supplied In Standard Package. 18. MIRRORS Left & Right Side: Dual Extending, Power Mirrors. Interior: Standard Dome Light. 19. CARGO BED Standard Service Bed 20. ACCESSORIES a. Front License Plate Bracket. b. Standard Factory Floor Covering With Rubber Mats. c. Gauges — Full Instrumental. d. Towing Package With 6 Prong Plug, With Class IV Hitch. e. Brake Controller f. Five pound DOT Approved Fire Extinguisher g. DOT Approved First Aid Kit h. Recovery Hooks (Front and Back) I. Amber Light Bar With 4 Corner Strobes, Built in Arrow Stick, Front and Rear Warning Strobes and Aux. Lights. j. Strobe Lights on Corners of Back Bumper k. Kenwood VHF 50 Watt Radio 21. LICENSES Exempt - Dealer To Process All Necessary DMV Registration Papers For License (No Charge For Exempt Registration), 22, OWNERS Operators Manual Will Be Furnished With MANUAL Vehicle(s) Upon Delivery 23. WARRANTY Factory/Dealer Warranties Will Be Furnished With Vehicle(s) Upon Delivery 24. KEYS 4 Sets of Vehicle Keys. DEALER: ADDRESS: PHONE: AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: SIGNATURE: MAKE: MODEL: YEAR: COLOR: Single Truck Purchase UNIT SALE PRICE PER TRUCK: SALES TAX PER TRUCK: TOTAL PRICE PER TRUCK: COSTS STATED WITHIN THE UNIT SALES PRICE ARE ALL-INCLUSIVE FOR SPECIFICATIONS LISTED. SIGNING THIS PROPOSAL GUARANTEES DELIVERY WITHIN 60-90 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER. April 14, 2015 CITY OF ^ LAK -E- LSINOFZE ---�% DREAM FXFREME REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Lake Elsinore hereinafter referred to as the City, is inviting proposals for qualified Dealers to provide the City with the following new 2015 vehicle: a 2WD, 1 Ton (Between 9,000- 12,000 GVWR) Utility Truck. The selected dealer will be responsible for meeting or exceeding all vehicle specifications listed in the Request for Proposal (RFP). Time Schedules: The following is the City's tentative schedule for the selection of a dealer: 1. Request For Proposal Mailed: 2. Deadline For Filing RFP: 3. Staff Review of Proposals/ Test Drive Vehicles: 4. Award of Purchase April 22, 2015 No later than 3:00 p.m. on May 4, 2015 May 7, 2015 May 26, 2015 Prior to 3:00 p.m., May 4, 2015 an original and four (4) copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope to: Via U.S,; Mail or Courier Service and Walk -In Delivery: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Administrative Services Director 130 South Main St, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Please clearly identify the package — PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE RFP — 2015 Submittal of response by fax is not acceptable. All questions technical or commercial in nature shall be directed to Rick DeSantiago, Public Works Superintendent, at RDesantiagoaa lake- elsinore.org. Contact with City of Lake Elsinore personnel other than those listed above regarding this RFP may be grounds for elimination from the selection process. Sincerely, Rick DeSantiago Public Works Superintendent CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SPECIFICATIONS NEW ONE TON UTILITY TRUCK (9,000-12,000 GVWR) FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATION NUMBER/ITEM DESCRIPTION INCLUDED COMMENTS (YESINO) 1. TYPE Full -Size 2WD, 1 Ton Between 9,000-12,000 GVWR Utility Trucks. 2. COLOR Exterior — White; Interior — Vinyl As Supplied With Standard Package. 3. WEIGHT Approximately 9,000-12,000 GVWR (please ` quote on vehicle that comes closest to this y requirement in your fleet). 4. ENGINE 8 Cylinder V8 Minimum 5 to 7 Liter Engine With High Capacity Air Cleaner, & Heavy Duty Battery. 5. FUEL Standard Gasoline. 6. STEERING Power Steering w/Tilt Steering Wheel. 7. BRAKES Power Brakes. \! Y, 8. TRANSMISSION 6 -Speed Automatic with Over Drive and / Tow/Haul Mode or Equivalent. y — 9. AXLES Rear Axle Ratio 4.10 Rear Axle Locking Differential. 10. WHEELBASE Single Rear Wheels. Minimum 133.6" 11. SPRINGS & Heavy Duty Front Springs. SHOCKS Heavy Duty Front & Rear Shocks. Y 12. TIRES All -Season Tires Standard Rim. Spare To Match. Y 13. INTERIOR Vinyl As Supplied Within Standard Package. Cloth is preferred. Front — Split Bench 40/20/40 Seat, center fold down with storage arm rest. 14. WINDOWS& Standard Factory Tint As Supplied Within o/ DOORS Standard Package. Power Windows & Locks. i 15. AIR- Factory installed. CONDITIONING 16, RADIO AM/FM Stereo CD Player with MP3, Seek & Scan, Digital Clock. Interior: Standard Dome Light. 17. BUMPERS Front and Rear Steel Bumpers, Painted or Chrome Or As Supplied In Standard TPackage. 18. MIRRORS Left & Right Side: Dual Extending, Power Mirrors. Interior: Standard Dome Light. 19. CARGO BED Standard Service Bed �^ �j f3'r kvvict-. t�f L 2r1 u2 �.ewti 20. ACCESSORIES a. Front License Plate Bracket. b. Standard Factory Floor Covering With fit? ,� Rubber Mats. c. Gauges — Full Instrumental. tp d. Towing Package With 6 Prong Plug, With 1 Class IV Hitch. e. Brake Controller f. Five pound DOT Approved Fire A 7 Extinguisher g. DOT Approved First Aid Kit Y h. Recovery Hooks (Front and Back) i. Amber Light Bar With 4 Corner Strobes, Built in Arrow Stick, Front and Rear Warning Strobes and Aux. Lights. j. Strobe Lights on Corners of Back Bumper k. Kenwood VHF 50 Watt Radio 21. LICENSES Exempt - Dealer To Process All Necessary DMV Registration Papers For License (No Charge For Exempt Registration). 22. OWNERS Operators Manual Will Be furnished With \A MANUAL Vehicle(s) Upon Delivery 7 23. WARRANTY Factory/Dealer Warranties Will Be Furnished With Vehicle(s) Upon Delivery 24. KEYS 4 Sets of Vehicle Keys. y DEALER: �-A4C "I---j"L 1 ADDRESS: ? l!11�� Irr& �tLFA i�t�Z 1�i2 iq�wYXI-- Cl1 ` ?6SBb PHONE: " <sl ` AUTHORIZEDJREzkESENTATIVE: �^ti JJI MAKE: ojr cy �7MODEL: <,41v t2 r YEAR: 2615 COLOR: xibil r Single Truck Purchase UNIT SALE PRICE PER TRUCK: 3Z Inti 1A _ SALES TAX PER TRUCK: 'G TOTAL PRICE PER TRUCK: 4027 +'> *Doc � CA --n QA:: et7-w,r pVnorI13.Zs COSTS STATED WITHIN THE UNIT SALES PRICE ARE ALL-INCLUSIVE FOR SPECIFICATIONS LISTED. SIGNING THIS PROPOSAL GUARANTEES DELIVERY WITHIN 60-90 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER. Prepared By: administrator 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail Chevrolet Silverado 350OHD Built After Aug 14 2WD SELECTED MODEL & OPTIONS SELECTED MODEL - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck Code Description CC35903 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 350OHD Built After Aug 14 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck SELECTED VEHICLE COLORS - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck Code Description Interior: Dark Ash Exterior 1: Summit White Exterior 2: No color has been selected. SELECTED OPTIONS - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck Code Description 1 WT WORK TRUCK PREFERRED EQUIPMENT GROUP includes standard equipment 9,14 BUMPER, REAR, DELETE (Requires single rear wheels. Included with (ZW9) pickup box delete.) *CREDIT* A31 WINDOWS, POWER with driver express up and down and express down on all other windows (Included and only available with (PCR) WT Fleet Convenience Package.) AE7 SEATS, FRONT 40/20/40 SPLIT -BENCH, 3 -PASSENGER, DRIVER AND FRONT PASSENGER RECLINE with outboard head restraints and center fold -down armrest with storage. Vinyl has fixed lumbar and cloth has manually adjustable driver lumbar. (STD) (Upgradeable to (AZ3) front 40/20/40 split -bench seat.) AQQ REMOTE KEYLESS ENTRY (Included and only available with (PCR) WT Fleet Convenience Package.) AVF 2015 INTERIM PROCESSING CODE DD8 MIRROR, INSIDE REARVIEW AUTO -DIMMING (Included and only available with (PCR) WT Fleet Convenience Package,) Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. GM AutoBook, Data Version: 384 0, Data updated 4/28/2015 © Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved. Customer File: May 04, 2015 11:02:19 AM Page 1 Prepared By: administrator I nt b�1 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail Chevrolet Silverado 35OOHD Built After Aug 14 2WD SELECTED MODEL & OPTIONS SELECTED OPTIONS - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.5" Work Truck Code Description DPN MIRRORS, OUTSIDE HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE VERTICAL CAMPER UPPER GLASS, MANUAL -FOLDING AND EXTENDING, BLACK. Includes integrated turn signal indicators consisting of 51 square inch flat mirror surface positioned over a 24.5 square inch convex mirror surface with a common head and lower convex spotter glass (convex glass is not heated and not power adjustable) and addition of Auxiliary cargo lamp for backing up (helps to see trailer when backing up with a trailer) and amber auxiliary clearance lamp (Included and only available with (PCR) WT Fleet Convenience Package and includes (DD8) auto - dimming inside rearview mirror.) GAZ SUMMIT WHITE GT5 REAR AXLE, 4.10 RATIO (Requires (1-96) Vortec 6.OL V8 SFI engine or (LC8) 6.0L V8 SFI Gaseous CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) engine.) H2Q DARK ASH, VINYL SEAT TRIM with Jet Black interior accents 104 CHEVROLET MYLINK AUDIO SYSTEM, 4.2" DIAGONAL COLOR SCREEN WITH AM/FM STEREO USB ports, auxiliary jack, SD card slot, Bluetooth streaming audio for music and most phones, hands-free smartphone integration, Pandora Internet radio and voice-activated technology for radio and phone JFI GVWR, 10,400 LBS. (4717 KG) WITH SINGLE REAR WHEELS (Requires C35903 and (1-96) Vortec 6.01- V8 SFI engine or (LC8) 6.OL V8 SFI Gaseous engine.) JL1 TRAILER BRAKE CONTROLLER, INTEGRATED (If (ZW9) pickup box delete or (9J4) rear bumper delete is ordered (JL1) trailer brake controller is deleted and available to order as a free flow option.) L96 ENGINE, VORTEC 6.OL VARIABLE VALVE TIMING V8 SFI E85 - COMPATIBLE, FLEXFUEL capable of running on unleaded or up to 85% ethanol (360 hp [268.4 kW] @ 5400 rpm, 380 Ib -ft of torque [515.0 N -m] @ 4200 rpm) with (E63) fleetside pickup box; (322 hp [240.1 kW] @ 4400 rpm, 380 Ib -ft of torque [515.0 N -m] @ 4200 rpm) with (ZW9) pickup box delete (Does not include E85 capability with (ZW9) pickup box delete.) (STD) Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. GM AutoBook, Data Version: 384,0, Data updated 4/28/2015 @ Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved. Customer File: May 04, 2015 11:02:19 AM Page 2 Prepared By: administrator J^ � JMN�101 e^ 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail Chevrolet Silverado 350OHD Built After Aug 14 2WD SELECTED MODEL & OPTIONS SELECTED OPTIONS - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck Code Description MYD TRANSMISSION, 6 -SPEED AUTOMATIC, HEAVY-DUTY, ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED with overdrive and tow/haul mode. Includes Cruise Grade Braking and Powertrain Grade Braking (Requires (L96) Vortec 6.OL V8 SFI engine or (LC8) 6.OL V8 SFI Gaseous CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) engine.) (STD) PCR WT FLEET CONVENIENCE PACKAGE includes (DPN) outside heated power -adjustable vertical camper mirrors, (DD8) inside rearview auto - dimming mirror and (AQQ) Remote Keyless Entry (Includes (A31) power windows.) PYT WHEELS, 18" (45.7 CM) PAINTED STEEL includes 18" x 8" (45.7 cm x 20.3 cm) steel spare wheel. Spare not included with (ZW9) pickup box delete unless a spare tire is ordered. (Requires single rear wheels, (QGM) LT265/70R18E all -terrain, blackwall tires or (QWF) LT265/70R1BE all -season, blackwall tires.) (STD) QWF TIRES, LT265/70R1 BE ALL -SEASON, BLACKWALL (Requires single rear wheels.) (STD) R9Y FLEET FREE MAINTENANCE CREDIT This option code provides a credit in lieu of the free oil changes, tire rotations and inspections (4 maximum), during the first 24 months and 24,000 miles period for this ordered vehicle. The invoice will detail the applicable credit. The customer will be responsible for all oil change, tire rotations and inspections costs for this vehicle. (Requires one of the following Fleet or Government order types: FBC, FBN, FCA, FCN, FLS, FNR or FGO. Not available with FDR order type.) *CREDIT" SFW BACKUP ALARM CALIBRATION This calibration will allow installation of an aftermarket back up alarm. (Not available with SEO (8S3) back-up alarm or (UY2) trailer wiring provisions. Included with (ZW9) pickup box delete.) SRW CHASSIS, SINGLE REAR WHEEL TG5 SINGLE -SLOT CD/MP3 PLAYER (Requires (104) 4.2" diagonal color display radio with Chevrolet MyLink.) Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. GM AutoBook, Data Version: 384.0, Data updated 4/28/2015 C Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved. Customer File: May 04, 2015 11:02:19 AM Page 3 Prepared By: administrator -.�.� �F M 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail Chevrolet Silverado 3500H Built After Aug 14 2WD SELECTED MODEL & OPTIONS SELECTED OPTIONS - 2015 Fleet/Non-Retail CC35903 2WD Reg Cab 133.6" Work Truck Code Description UE1 ONSTAR DIRECTIONS AND CONNECTIONS PLAN FOR 6 MONTHS including Automatic Crash Response, Stolen Vehicle Assistance, Roadside Assistance and Turn -by -Turn Navigation (Requires (104) 4.2" diagonal color display radio with Chevrolet MyLink. Visit onstar.com for coverage map, details and system limitations. Services vary by model and conditions.) BLUETOOTH FOR PHONE personal cell phone connectivity to vehicle audio system (Included and only available with (104) 4.2" diagonal color display radio with Chevrolet MyLink) V02 FLEET PROCESSING OPTION VV4 ONSTAR WITH 4G LTE provides a built-in Wi-Fl hotspot to connect to the internet at 4G LTE speeds (Requires (104) 4.2" diagonal color display radio with Chevrolet MyLink. Visit www.onstar.com for vehicle availability, details and system limitations. Services and connectivity may vary by model and conditions. 4G LTE service available in select markets. 4G LTE performance based on industry averages and vehicle systems design. Some services require data plan.) YF5 EMISSIONS, CALIFORNIA STATE REQUIREMENTS Z85 SUSPENSION PACKAGE, STANDARD includes 51mm twin tube shock absorbers and 33mm front stabilizer bar (STD) ZW9 PICKUP BOX, DELETE includes (9J4) rear bumper delete, spare tire delete and spare tire carrier delete, and deletes (Z82) trailering equipment and (JL1) trailer brake controller. (Requires a long box model C"359`3.) *CREDIT- ZY1 PAINT. SOLID OPTIONS TOTAL Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. GM AutoBook, Data Version: 384.0, Data updated 4/28/2015 ©Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved. Customer File: May 04, 2015 11:02:19 AM Page 4 Page 1 of 7 hlgz!/images.colmII Ioup.com/Si°/9/10 1219S798�..IPg ~/6/2015 t .ai�l�� Slle;'•i:Js Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 4) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-643 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92539 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page l Printed on 6/18/2015 CITY OP LADE IlLSINOKE DREAM EX(FREMrn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: June 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Service Contract with Carole Donahoe to Provide Specialized Planning Services for Fiscal Year 2015- 2016 Recommendation 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe for the provision of specialized planning services to the City of Lake Elsinore during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background The City of Lake Elsinore has been utilizing contract personnel to assist with specialized planning duties in the Community Development Department for a number of years. During past years, contract planners have managed a full range of projects that include, but are not limited to, annexations, zone changes, Specific Plans and Specific Plan Amendments, General Plan amendments, commercial/industrial design review, subdivisions (tentative tract/ parcel maps), conditional use permits, minor design reviews, and CEQA review. Next fiscal year (FY) the Planning Division will be working towards completion of the Consistency Zoning Project which was initiated following the City Council's approval of the City's General Plan in December 2011. Since approval of the General Plan, Carole Donahoe has taken the lead in completing the first five phases of the Consistency Zoning Project. During Fiscal Year 2015/2016, Ms. Donahoe will continue managing the City-wide Consistency Zoning Project, with the intent of completing the final phase by the end of the fiscal year. She will also perform other planning duties, including project review, on an as needed basis. Professional Planning Service Contract June 23, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Discussion Agreements for contract Planning Staff generally coincide with the City's budget cycle. The subject Professional Service Contract, if approved, would cover Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/2016. The City's established rate for contract planners is $75.00 per hour, which is consistent with the market rate for contract services. Ms. Donahoe brings many years of experience working with the City, during which time she has established professional relationships with the development community and City Staff. Based on her experience and her successful completion of the first five phases of the Consistency Zoning Project, staff believes that Ms. Donahoe has the specialized experience necessary to complete the Consistency Zoning Project and other planning duties that may be assigned during FY 2015/2016. Fiscal Impact Any duties assigned to Ms. Donahoe that are billable through the developer deposit Cost Recovery System (CRS) for the development projects will have minimal fiscal impact to the City. However, most Ms. Donahoe's work during FY 2015/2016 will be on department -initiated projects, such as the Consistency Zoning Project, which are not related to Cost Recovery System (CRS) accounts. The cost of this department -initiated work has been included in the City Council approved budget for FY 2015-2016 as an appropriation of $50,000 for a Planning Consultant. Prepared by: Richard J. MacHott Planning Manager Reviewed by: Grant Taylor Community Development Director Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachment: 1. Draft Consultant Services Contract. CONTRACTDATEOF3FLY 1, 2015 CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT r'i:xi�h Ai:Ai:i;r"i:xi:i:ris is r"Ri:>Si:isxi:isisRi:i•i::ii:ARr�r'�>ixi:xr.i:Ri:*i;n>;Rx'is is is*nri: i:xrtxa�xxxr:xrxra> A TI IIS AGREEMENT made and entered into oil - 2015 by the City ofLakc Elsinore, a municipal corporation, party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and CONTRACTOR Carole Donahoe S.S/E.I.N. NO. MAILING ADDRE CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER Party of the second part, bereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR. CONTRACT PERIOD: From July 1, 2015 to June 30- 2016 FOR USE BY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ONLY Vendor Jf Amount $ Acct. Purchase Order H Obj. Code City Division ACCT. To Be Chgd. Document Pi eparer __ Date Ext. or Telephone N A. CITY desires to retain CONTRACTOR to perform professional services in connection with land use planning and environmental projects, documentation and processing and CONTRACTOR desires to provide such professional services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein expressed and of the faithftil performance by CONTRACTOR of all covenants and agreements, the CITY and CONTRACTOR agrees as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES — CONTRACTOR services shall include but not be limited to: Management of a variety of land use projects; meetings with project applicant(s), City Staff, Planting Commission, and City Council; Coordination with all City Divisions, outside agencies, CEQA and MSHCP review; documentation of all case file correspondence exhibits and documents. CONTRAC'T'OR shall determine the hours to be provided as necessary to carry out project loads, subject to approval of the City Manager of Director of Community Development. 2. COMPENSATION — CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR the following amount which includes travel and all other related expenses: $75.00 per hour and $0.575 (per Internal Revenue Service Guidelines) per mile of the prevailing standard mileage ieimbursennent rate (for mileage incurred on City business — does not include "port -to -port") whichever is higher. Payment processing will begin upon presentation of all invoice (format approved by the City) detailing the services rendered. 3. QUALIFICATIONS - CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to City that he/she has and shall maintain at all tines during the terns of this Agreement the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals which are legally required of CONTRACTOR to perform the services hereunder. CITY has relied upon the professional training and ability of CONTRACTOR to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. The standard of care for all professional services performed or furnished by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of the subject profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same lime and in the same locality. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR - It is understood that CONTRACTOR, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to CITY'S employees, and CONTRACTOR hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. By signing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR certifies that he/she is not an employee of the City of Lake Elsinore. 5. HOLD I-IARMLESS - CONTRACI'OR shall be responsible for and hold the CITY harmless from all damage to property, injury to persons, and loss, expense, inconvenience, and delay that may be caused by of result from any act, omission, or neglect of CONTRACTOR. CONTRACT DATE OF JULY 1, 2015 6. NON -ASSIGNMENT - It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR shall not assign, sublet, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without written consent of CITY. 7. APPLICABLE LAW - This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 8. AUDIT CLAUSE - CONTRACTOR agrees that books, records, documents, accounting procedures, practices, or any other items of the service provider relevant to the Agi cement are subject to examination by the City of Lake Elsinore. 9. DOCUMENTS - All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for CONTRACTOR in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of CITY upon payment to CONTRACTOR for such work, and CITY shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without fiuther compensation to CONTRACTOR at to any other party. 10. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by CITY immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date oftermination. 11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT - This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the CITY and CONTRACTOR. All prier written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 12. AMENDMENTS -This Agreement may be modified of amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 13. SEVERABILITY - If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competeutjurisdictimr, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. }rtakxf#rak R:�:kxxr,.xxnx#:4:<K Y,eKa'{r Ta: 3, r;.ki; F'J,:x MKxzrFXvak :k :k, xn, ST:a$,t'*T:K$xa,'.Tki ak ax v`y. r;. >k*yk f}kk:4#*KMK. xM$�%k%i $xakR r'{x ,.,., xxx;x:�*xrvgn RETURN TO: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ATTN: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE City Manager CONTRACTOR Carole K. Donahoe, AICD NON-DISCRI M INA'I JON C'LAUSI, 'Ilie CM of Lake I9kcnorn, in compliance with Title VI and '1111e VII of the Civil Rights Ac of 1964, Title IX ofthe Education Amendmenis of 1972, Seel loll 504 of the Rehabi l dation Ac of 1973_ SeeWill 402 of the Read us(menI Assistance Act of 1974, Americans Wilh Disabilities Act and ether I�cdcrd Imus and regulation, and California Lnv and reguIatolls, . does not discriminate on the basis of Iam color, ethnicity, national origin 'e" age, IcIIgion, disability, political ad7i l iill ion, or Stat us as a veteran in any of its policies practices, or procedures_ phis includes hill is not limited to employment and the provision of municipal services. Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 5) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-644 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6118/2015 LS I NO E DisLAN4 E,)(Ttit:mt REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayor as the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 — October 2, 2015 in San Jose. Discussion The League of California Cities will be holding its Annual Conference on September 30 through October 2, 2015, in San Jose, California this year. Numerous legislative bills that affect cities are discussed and voted on at this conference. Mayor Manos is appointed to the League's Legislative Policy Committee and as such will be attending this Conference. Therefore, it is requested that the Council vote to authorize the Mayor to be the City's voting delegate at this conference. Attached is the notification from the League advising of the requirement for Council action in this regard. Prepared By: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved By: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: League of California Cities Annual Conference Voting Delegate lifornia 14 LIZ -- L EAG iG 1 L 1400 K Street, Suite 400 916 658 8200tFax:a916 658.8240 L A lJ G www.cacities.org CITIES Conned Aetlon Advised by July 31, 2015 . ECC E I V VE" D May 29, 2015 JET ... a 2015 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerics CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 30 — October 2, San ,lose The League's 2015Annual Conference is scheduled for September 30 — October 2 in San Jose. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assen?bly), scheduled for noon on Friday, October 2, at the San Jose Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Friday, September 18, 2015. 'Phis will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting, Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken.or have your city clerk or mavor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accgmnlislicd Uy_i»di_vidual action of the mavor or cit nnager alone. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference:. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacitics.ort;. In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the -over- Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them too receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. • Transferring Voting Card to Non -Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may nol transfer the voting card to another city official. • Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges. The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the San Jose Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September 30, 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, October 1, 7:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.; and Friday, October 2, 7:30--10:00 a.m. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by Friday, September 18. If you have questions, please call Kayla Gibson at (916)658-8247. Attachments: • 2015 Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate/Alternate Form Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2015 Annual Conference One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Cona nittec. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must: sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting arca at the Business Meeting, 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or altemates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate it resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card maybe transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying there as a voting delegate or alternate. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. LEAGUE CAUFORNIA CITIES CITY:_ 2015 ANNUAL, CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, September 18, 2015. Porins not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resohition as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please Dots: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Amoral Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are idcuGficui with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGA'T'E Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE+, - ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: 1 affirm that the information provided rellects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). Name: Mayor uz City (eirelc one) Date: (signatille) E-mail Phone: Please complete andreCnu t� by Friday Septemlier 1.8y 201.5 League of California Cities FAX: (916) 658-8240 ATTN: Kayla Gibson E-mail: kgibson@cacities.org 1400 K Street, 4"' Floor (916) 658-8247 Sacramento, CA 95814 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 6) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-645 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 CITY OF LAKE�LS1nC3 UE DRr:AAl I;XTEi(iMEsn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore (Serenity Park Phase II Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement by and between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount not to exceed $79,409 for landscape architecture, engineering services and reimbursables related to design development and construction documents for Serenity Park Phase II located at 19685 Palomar Road and the adjacent 2.68 acre parcel (APN 370-120-045) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background The City recently acquired an unimproved 2.68 acre parcel adjacent to Serenity Park for the expansion of the park. The City solicited a written proposal from a qualified landscape architectural and design firm for the conceptual design, design development and delivery of construction documents for Serenity Park Phase II. RHA Landscape Architects Planners submitted a design proposal and fees. The proposal meets the requirements of the City's request for proposal and is a highly respected firm in the industry. Professional Services Agreement — RHA June 23, 2015 Page 2 Discussion Serenity Park Phase II will include a restroom, parking, security lighting, ADA improvements, a possible bicycle park and other recreational opportunities as determined in the design phase. The Agreement will also provide the development of construction documents, which will include a complete set of plans, working drawings and specifications, general/special provisions and other required documents for a complete and approved set of construction documents to construct the park improvements. Fiscal Impact Serenity Park Phase II Expansion is budgeted in the City's CIP and funds are available from CFD 2005-1. Prepared by: Johnathan O. Skinner Director of Community Services Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: • Professional Services Agreement • RHA Landscape Architects Planners Proposal • RHA Landscape Architects Planners Fee Schedule 6780 Indiana Avenue, Suite 160, Riverside, California 92506 dougg@rhala.com - (951)781-1930 - (951)686-8091 fax C IIY OI= Llai�l: �sLS(NO1ZL 11" `7 P.ylT 2[mf June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy City of Lake Elsinore Community Services Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: REP —Design Services for Serenity Park Improvements Dear Ms. McCarthy and Consultant Selection Committee: RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. is very pleased to submit this proposal for the City of Lake Elsinore's Serenity Park Improvement project. We are very excited about the project and believe that we can provide the City with the most thorough and detailed plans and documents that will meet all of the goals of the city and the residents. We also understand the critical nature of the project schedule and the importance of maintaining all Project Milestone Dates. We have provided a detailed project schedule demonstrating how we will ensure that all project time frames are met. RHA is located in Riverside, California and has been providing Landscape Architectural Services for cities and agencies throughout Southern California for over 35 years. We have specialized on many projects very similar to this and we are looking forward to providing our expertise in park planning and development. We are also excited to have the Action Sport Group division of Stantec as part of the design team. They specialize in bicycle skills parks and BMX facilities and will bring this unique and unmatched experience to the project to prepare an award winning design for the park. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. As you examine the enclosed material, we are confident you will discover that the RHA Team provides the best park development planning experience and most of all, a team that is eager to work with the City towards fulfilling its goals of improving Serenity Park to better serve the city residents. We look forward to an opportunity of working with you on this very exciting and successful project. Sincerely, NDSCAPE HITECTS-PLANNERS, INC. ve, RL # 99, EDS AP Principal 6780 Indiana Avenue, Suite 160 Riverside, CA 92506 951-781-1930 ext 121 doggg@rhala.com RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Cover Letter Design Services—Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter Table of Co June 8, 2015 Firm Background 3 Proposed Landscape Architect Mem Proposed Project Approach 12 Schedule Experience 17 Financial Additional RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Table of Contents Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore FIRM BACKGROUND Established in 1979, RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. offers a wide range of landscape architectural and planning services to assist public agencies and private developers in the design of variety of public spaces and facilities including • Community Parks • Neighborhood parks • Sports Facilities • Recreation Areas • Preservation of Natural and Historic Sites • Government Centers • Public Office and Administration Facilities • Golf Courses • Commercial Retail Centers • Shopping Centers • Mixed Use Housing/Commercial • Hotels • Hospitals • Business Parks • Streetscapes • Master planned communities Our specific scope of work will depend upon the nature of each project and may consist of any or all of the following. • Preliminary Design Development • Site Evaluation and Selection • Working Drawings/Specifications • Assistance during Bidding • Construction Observation and Consulting • Maintenance Guidelines and Observation • Consensus Building • Program Development • Master Planning • Recreation Land -Use Planning • Site Planning • General Consulting RHA is a California corporation and is headed by two principals: Randy Hlubik, ASLA, the firm's president and Doug Grove, RLA, LEED AP. We use a "team" approach under the direction of the firm's principals and its associates. RHA is located in the City of Riverside, a location central to the Inland Empire. The staff of six (6) persons includes four (4) licensed landscape architects as well as support designers. Over the course of the firm's 30 years of work in Southern California, RHA has garnered a number of prestigious awards from a variety of organizations, including the American Society of Landscape Architects, the American Planning Association, and the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). One of the firm'sprojects, the General Plan for the California Citrus State Historic Park, was named the Outstanding Planning Project by the Inland Empire Section of the American Planning Association, and received a prestigious Honor Award from the Southern California Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects. The firm also garnered CPRS awards for Excellence in Park & Facility Planning for the Cities of Upland (McCarthy Park), Riverside (White Park), Norco (Pikes Peak Park) and Riverside County (Ranch Jurupa Park). Pikes Peak Park was also given an APWA (American Public Works Association) award of excellence. Ra it Clio .It] ru pa Sports Park — Iuruga Valley RHA takes pride in preparing documents that result in minimal to no change orders during the construction of the project. Our park projects typically have less than 1% change orders resulting from RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS, INC. Firm Background 3 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore June 8, 2015 design errors and/or omissions. While no one can prepare a "perfect" set of plans, RHA strives and accomplishes this low change order percentage through a thorough in-house plan check process that involves the project Principal -in -Charge as well as another review by a principal and/or senior project manager. If and when issues do arise during construction, RHA works diligently to resolve the matter within 48 hours so that the construction can continue to move forward without incurring additional costs for delays. Project scheduling is an important part of the plan preparation. RHA utilizes Microsoft Project to prepare a detailed project schedule at the beginning of the project and updates the schedule on a regular basis to insure the project is completed on time. While we do not have control over agency reviews and internal agency schedules and priorities, we strive to complete our portion of the work in a timely manner per the project schedule to keep the project moving in a positive direction. Tamarisk Park— Lake Forest The ability to accurately project the cost of a Rimgate Park — LakeForest park development is a very critical step in the preparation of park construction documents. Even the greatest designs are meaningless if there is no money to build them. The cost of re -bidding a public park project if the bids come in too high can be extreme for a City already operating on a tight budget. The amount of money available is finite and there is no room for error when estimating the costs for the project. RHA has had tremendous success in preparing cost estimates. The reason for this exceptional accuracy is the constant contact RHA keeps with the construction industry and specifically public park contractors. We are constantly updating our computer-based cost estimating program with the latest price information from our most recently bid projects. RHA typically bids 3-4 projects per year which enables us to keep up-to-date cost estimate numbers for a variety of park projects. RHA is unequivocally committed to deliver a high quality project on time, within budget, and in a professional and competent manner. RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. 6780 Indiana Avenue, Suite 160 Riverside, CA 92506 951-781-1930 951-686-8091 Arroyo Grande Dirt PumI) l rack & Jump Park RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHI'T'ECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Firm Background 4 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MEMBERS We have compiled a highly experienced and qualified team of professionals to insure that nothing is overlooked in the preparation of the documents for this very important project. RHA will be the lead consultant in charge for the consultant team and will be the main point of contact with the city. The key individuals listed below will be performing the work and will not be substituted with other personnel or reassigned to another project without the City's approval. Jim Corns Principal/PM Ruben Gutierrez Staff Doug Grove Principal/PM David Black Staff Lauren McHugh Staff Frank Correia Principal/PM Mike McIntyre Principal Kanten Russell Project Manager RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. - Doug Grove, Principal, will be lead the design team throughout the course of the project. He will be assisted in the office by David Black and Lauren McHugh; both licensed Landscape Architects with numerous years of experience in park planning and design. RNA's current workload will allow Doug, David and Lauren to be readily available as the project moves forward, ensuring a timely delivery of the design development and construction documents for the park. Percentage of time spent on project Years with Firm Doug Grove 60% 21 David Black 20% 12 Lauren McHugh 20% 9 Primary manager during design and construction phase Doug Grove Primary party for landscape architecture Lauren McHugh Primary party for construction drawings David Black Primary party for assistance during construction David Black Stantec will provide all bike park design and civil engineering for the project including grading, drainage, and erosion control plans. The Action Sports Group of Stantec holds the largest, most notable portfolio of skate, bike, and action sport parks worldwide. Because their designers live outside of the box, they're adept at creating functional, site -integrated, and visually spectacular spaces that give a cohesive sense of place, become a source of community pride, and leave your heart pumping. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members 5 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Percentage of time spent on project Years with Firm Mike McIntyre 50% 7 Kanten Russell 50% 7 Primary manager during design and construction phase Kanten Russell Primary party for action sports design Mike McIntyre Primary party for construction drawings Kanten Russell Primary party for assistance during construction Kanten Russell June 8, 2015 JCA Engineering will prepare all electrical plans necessary for the project. JCA offers comprehensive experience in government, public works, parks, religious, business, institutional and educational facilities electrical system requirements and construction. Percentage of time spent on project Years with Firm Jim Corns 80% 16 Ruben Gutierrez 20% 16 Primary manager during design and construction phase Jim Corns Primary party for electrical engineering Jim Corns Primary party for construction drawings Jim Corns Primary party for assistance during construction Jim Corns Correia Surveying will provide all surveying services required for the project. This will include a complete topographic survey of both park sites. Percentage of time spent on project Years with Firm Frank Correia 100% 30 Primary manager for surveying Frank Correia RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHI1'EC7'S - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members 0 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Doug Grove, RLA, LEED' AP Principal Education: BS/1985/Landscape Architecture/ Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona No Active Registration: 1987/Landscape Architect/2799/State of California LEED Accredited Professional — United States Green Building Council (USGBC) Mr. Grove is a Principal Landscape Architect and LEED Accredited Professional with RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS, INC. He graduated from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 1985 and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Landscape Architecture. He has more than twenty-seven years experience as a professional Landscape Architect. He brings to the firm a wide range of experience in the public works sector having been personally involved in the design and project management of hundreds of park projects as well as housing development, streetscape, institutional and commercial projects As a professional Landscape Architect, Mr. Grove has established his ability to work efficiently and professionally throughout all aspects of project development. His extensive experience has included management and design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents, and coordination and observation of project installation. He has been responsible for coordinating public meetings, design development, and approval on numerous public works projects as well as following through with obtaining all other necessary approvals needed for final drawing completion. Mr. Grove also serves on the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS) District 11 Board of Directors as the Development and Operations Section Representative as well as a past member of the CPRS State Board of Directors as the Council of Sections Representative. He is also the past President of the CPRS State Development and Operations Section. He is also a member of the California Turf and Landscape Foundation at the University of California, Riverside and a past Board Member for the United States Green Building Council— Inland Empire (USGBC-IE). Representative projects include (partial list — complete list available upon request): Park and Recreation Needs Assessments • Temple City Parks and Open Space Master Plan • Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Action Plan Neighborhood Parks • Rimgate and Tamarisk Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • Concourse and Mountain View Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • San Antonio Park, City of Upland • McCarthy Park, City of Upland Historical Parks • Founders Park, City of Anaheim • Reyes -Adobe, City of Agoura Hills Community and Sports Parks • Grape Day Park Master Plan and Renovations, City of Escondido • Santa Fe Dam Sports Park, City of Irwindale (Kare Youth League) • Fergusson Park, City of Rialto • Rancho Jurupa Park— RV Park, Water Play & Miniature Golf, County of Riverside • American Heroes Park, City of Lancaster RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members 7 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore David Black, RLA Landscape Architect Education: BS/1999/Landscape Architecture/ Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona June 8, 2015 Active Registration: 2009/1-andscape Architect/5509/State of California Contractor License CA #789824(C27) Mr. Black is a Project Manager and Licensed Landscape Architect with RHA Landscape Architects - Planners, Inc. He graduated from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Landscape Architecture. He has more than 16 years of landscape design and construction experience. As a professional Landscape Architect, Mr. Black has established his ability to work efficiently and professionally throughout all aspects of project development. His experience has included management and design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents, and coordination and observation of project installation. He has been responsible for coordinating meetings with clients and governing agencies, overseeing project budget preparation, design development and approval on numerous projects as well as following through with obtaining all other necessary approvals needed for final drawing completion. Representative projects include (partial list — complete list available upon request): Neighborhood Parks • Rimgate and Tamarisk Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • Concourse and Mountain View Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • San Antonio Park, City of Upland • Eller Park, Romoland Historical Parks • Founders Park, City of Anaheim • Reyes -Adobe, City of Agoura Hills Community and Sports Parks • Grape Day Park Master Plan and Renovations, City of Escondido • Santa Fe Dam Sports Park, City of Irwindale (Kare Youth League) • Fergusson Park, City of Rialto • Rancho Jurupa Regional Sports Complex (synthetic turf), County of Riverside • Rancho Jurupa Park— RV Park, Water Play & Miniature Golf, County of Riverside • American Heroes Park, City of Lancaster RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Lauren McHugh, RLA Landscape Architect Education: BS/2006/Landscape Architecture/ Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona Active Registration: 2009/1-andscape Architect/5578/State of California June 8, 2015 Ms. McHugh is a Project Architect with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. She graduated from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Landscape Architecture. She has more than 9 years of landscape design and computer aided graphic design experience. Her experience has included design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents. She has been responsible for design development, project coordination and project approval. She possesses computer design skills that allow for multi -media presentations and computer rendering. Representative projects include (partial list — complete list available upon request): Park and Recreation Needs Assessments • Temple City Parks and Open Space Master Plan • Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Action Plan Neighborhood Parks • Rimgate and Tamarisk Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • Concourse and Mountain View Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • San Antonio Park, City of Upland Historical Parks • Founders Park, City of Anaheim • Reyes -Adobe, City of Agoura Hills Community and Sports Parks • Grape Day Park Master Plan and Renovations, City of Escondido • Santa Fe Dam Sports Park, City of Irwindale (Kare Youth League) • Fergusson Park, City of Rialto • Rancho Jurupa Regional Sports Complex (synthetic turf), County of Riverside • Rancho Jurupa Park— RV Park, Water Play & Miniature Golf, County of Riverside • American Heroes Park, City of Lancaster RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Mike McIntyre, RLA, ASLA, CLARB Principal -in -Charge Education: BS/1994/Landscape Architecture/ Active Registration: Registered Landscape Architect #36669 Council of Landscape Architectural Registration Boards (CLARB) As Lead Action Park Consultant, Mike is an awarded action sport facility designer and California registered Landscape Architect. Santa Clara County native, Mike is a former sponsored BMX rider and since turning to design has completed over 200 relevant action sport specific projects, many of which have been for municipalities. Relevant Project Experience • Milton Reimers Ranch Mountain Bike Trail & Park Master Plan, Travis County, TX • Live Oak Fitness Park, Live Oak, TX • Northeast Metropolitan Bike Facility, Travis County, TX • Elizabeth Milburn Park Bike Facility, Cedar Park, TX • Miramar Action Sport Park, San Diego, CA • 2012 Olympic BMX Track/Training Center, Chula Vista, CA • Hesperia National BMX Track, Hesperia, CA • Rock Hill Super BMX Facility, Rock Hill, NC RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members 10 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Kanten Russell Project Manager Education: AS Engineering Survey As Cad Design June 8, 2015 Stantec's Project Manager has been working with Mike for over 7 years and has completed many of his 75 action sport related projects in the capacity of Project Manager. Kanten is also a former professional skateboarder and bringing insight from current professional action sport athletes into design phases. Relevant Project Experience • Miramar Action Sport Park, San Diego, CA • 2012 Olympic BMX Track/Training Center, Chula Vista, CA • Milton Reimers Ranch Mountain Bike Trail & Park Master Plan, Travis County, TX • Live Oak Fitness Park, Live Oak, TX • Northeast Metropolitan Bike Facility, Travis County, TX • Elizabeth Milburn Park Bike Facility, Cedar Park, TX • Hesperia National BMX Track, Hesperia, CA • Rock Hill Super BMX Facility, Rock Hill, NC v�ei: RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Project Landscape Architect Members II Design Services—Serenity Park Improvements June S, 2015 Cathy McCarthy—City of Lake Elsinore PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH We understand that the services required for the Serenity Park improvements will include working with the City to evaluate the site and develop a final design. The amenities will include a restroom, parking, security lighting, ADA improvements, a possible bicycle skills park, resurfacing of the existing half -court basketball, and other recreational opportunities as determined in the design phase. Once a final design is submitted and approved by the City, we will prepare construction drawings for all improvements. We also understand the budget for construction is approximately $500,000. When constructing new facilities at an existing park, scheduling and staging the work to minimize impacts on the public during the construction process is extremely important. We will work with the city to develop strategies that will minimize these impacts. TASK 1— Conceptual Design Development A. Project Scoping Meeting We will coordinate and attend a project scoping meeting within one (1) week of receiving the Notice -to -Proceed from the City. The purpose of the meeting will be to establish the Project Development Team (PDT) and establish clear lines of communications, review and redefine the proposed project scope and schedule and establish general design guidelines, discuss project parameters and constraints and obtain background data. The PDT will be made up of selected city staff from ALL departments so that all potential issues related to the development of the proposed improvements can be discussed. We will coordinate and attend status meetings as necessary during the course of the project to keep the PDT abreast of the project development. We will establish review milestones in the project schedule and submit deliverable products in a timely manner for adequate PDT review and revision. We will prepare meeting notes with an action item matrix and agenda and distribute to the city and other attendees. B. Research and Review Project Data RHA will meet with city staff and compile all site plans and data currently available. Meeting with current park maintenance and operations staff will be critical in helping to identify the deficiencies and successes of the park including lighting, irrigation, plant material, park uses, etc. so that these can be addressed in the design. A complete photographic study of the site will also be prepared. C. Topographic Survey and Base Mapping Correia Surveying will perform topographic survey extending through the project limits. Physical features shall include BCR, ECR, flow -lines, centerlines, angle points, top of curb, spandrels, pavement striping, utilities, structures, walls, trees and landscape, painted underground and surface utilities, poles, hydrants, catch basins, signs, valves, manholes, and all other physical features. All topographic survey information gathered in the field will be incorporated in the base map. D. Conceptual Design We will prepare one (1) Conceptual Plan for the park showing all of the proposed improvements as outlined in the RFP and discussed in the meetings with city staff. This drawing will be prepared over a site aerial photo as demonstrated below. It has been our experience that preparing the draft plan over the aerial photograph makes is much easier to visualize and discuss the proposed improvements and how they will relate and affect the existing park improvements. Cost estimates will also be prepared to ensure that the project is within RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PL,ANNERS, INC. Proposed Project Approach 12 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore budget. Based on comments received from the PDT we will prepare a Final Conceptual Plan. We will also update the cost estimate and phasing plan for review with the PDT. The plan can be produced at any size and transmitted via email in any format needed by the city including JPEG, PDF, DWG, DXF, etc. The plan will be refined in extreme detail in AutoCAD so that there is a seamless transition to the Construction Documents E. Meetings We have budgeted for a minimum of three (3) meetings with city staff during this phase. June 8, 2015 TASK 2 — Construction Documents The Construction Document Phase of the project will consist of the preparation of the construction documents to include final drawings, specifications, calculations, WQMP (if required), SWPPP (if required), and final cost estimates. This work will include complete and comprehensive landscape architectural and engineering services required to execute the entire project. The following plans and studies will be provided: A. Geotechnical Exploration and Report We understand that the city will provide the geotechnical soils studies. We will provide input on boring locations and coordination with the geotechnical engineer. B. Demolition Plans RHA will prepare demolition plans delineating which site elements are to remain and which are to be removed. C. Precise Grading Plans and Drainage Plans Stantec will prepare a precise grading plan for the site. During the preliminary stages of preparing the site plan, the grading plan will identify existing contours, proposed finished surface elevations (including FG, FS, TC, and FL elevations), and proposed drainage features. As part of the grading design, ADA accessibility will be reviewed and grades set accordingly. D. Erosion Control Plans Stantec will prepare the necessary erosion control plan in compliance with the requirements of the local agency relative to the grading of the project. This plan shall also be prepared in compliance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and Water Quality Management Plan as defined below. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Proposed Project Approach 13 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy—City of Lake Elsinore June 8, 2015 E. On-site Domestic Water Improvement Plan Stantec will prepare on-site water improvement plan for connection to the new restroom. The plan will indicate water main alignment and sizing, and locations and sizing of water meters and valves in plan view only. Potholing at connections to existing facilities is not a part of this work. F. On-site Storm Drain Improvement Plan Stantec will prepare on-site storm drain improvement plans. Plan will indicate main line alignments and sizing, laterals, catch basins, manholes, junction structures, inlet/outlet structures, and other pertinent drainage improvements. G. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drain Improvement Plan Stantec will prepare a utility plan for the sanitary sewer and storm drain connection from the proposed restroom to the existing public utility lines within the adjacent street. Plan will include plan view only and contain the necessary notes and specifications as required by the local agency. H. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (if required) Stantec will prepare a WQMP in conformance with the requirements and conditions of the local municipal agency. The WQMP shall prescribe structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented at the project site to satisfy local water quality requirements. Treatment control BMPs, if any, shall be appropriately sized to meet minimum flow rate/volume mitigation design requirements of the local municipal agency. The need for this plan will be determined once the full scope of improvements on each site is determined during Design Development. I. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (if required) Stantec will prepare a SWPPP for use by the City, compliant with Sections I.M and XIV of the Order of the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities (SWRCB Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ). The report will prescribe Best Management Practices (BMPs), as identified in the CASQA California Storm Water BMP Handbook as appropriate. A NO1 will be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board on behalf of the City along with all documents being uploaded onto the State's Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). Application fees shall be paid for by the City. This task includes an electronic copy of the report only. The need for this plan will be determined once the full scope of improvements on each site is determined during Design Development. J. Electrical Plans JCA Engineering will provide all electrical engineering services to include all necessary plans to provide lighting and electricity for all elements of the site. It is our understanding that the bike skills park will not be lighted. K. Site Plan & Construction Details RHA and Stantec will prepare site construction plans that will locate by dimensioning all exterior site elements including walks, restroom building, bike skills park, parking lot, and other pertinent site elements. The plans will also identify all paving and construction materials. Details will be provided to demonstrate proper construction and installation of all the site elements. L. Irrigation Plans RHA will prepare irrigation plans that will utilize low water use irrigation equipment. They will include pressure loss calculations, point of connection, meter size, backflow devices, mainline, RIIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Proposed Project Approach 14 Design Services— Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore June 8, 2015 lateral and head layout, drip irrigation layout, controller location, and flow calculations. Details will be provided to demonstrate proper installation of all irrigation equipment. M. Planting Plans RHA will prepare detailed plans for all planting areas on the site. These plans will locate and identify all items of plant material to be used. Drought tolerant plant materials will be used to conserve water, reduce maintenance and ensure the long term health and viability of the plant material. N. Technical Specifications and Contract Documents We will prepare specifications in conformance with the current Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) and other applicable agency standard plans, specifications, and guidance documents in order to obtain plan approval. We will provide the required standards and reference materials to be included in the City's standard contract documents. The specifications will provide detailed technical information pertaining to the administration of the contract for construction, materials and equipment to be furnished, acceptable manufacturers, and the requirements for executing the work. The city's standard language and Construction Standards will be incorporated. O. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost We will prepare an engineer's construction estimate for the designed Project at the 30% submittal and 100% submittal. Cost estimates shall have quantities and unit prices with back- up calculations for all quantities. We will verify current unit prices at time of final plan approval. The opinion of cost will be prepared utilizing specific area and quantity take -offs applied to labor and material cost, and will include allowance for general conditions, contractor's profit and overhead, city costs and contingencies. P. Final Plan Check All final plans, specifications, and supporting calculations will be submitted to appropriate agencies having jurisdiction over the project. The final construction documents will be revised and amended to incorporate all plan check requirements and address all comments and necessary revisions. Q. Final Plan Check We will obtain the red line as -built plans from the contractor at the completion of construction and draft all information into AutoCAD. We will provide the final as -built plans on mylar, and in AutoCAD and PDF form. R. Meetings We have budgeted for a minimum of four (4) meetings with city staff during this phase. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Proposed Project Approach 15 W N c i N ZI, O •cO N � /�� Y U O y m ♦+ m y N � O O O L L J: L• N N._ln h � to IP N t(J._-h N In IP N YJ h_. Ln N N In :, i N ` J J h r W OJ CJ "O J J L L L h � w 44 CST T T Y T T T T Y T Y Y T • V a a M N� M a N� a [Y a N M� N N a N 6......1 n. w Ul O. O ti .fig w 0 oC aNi y N O a0+ O M✓ 0 a+ uo'' F C y .� L �/` a� � UO b➢ U b➢ N h0 J bc-➢ J � J V N.,: � � i � � v � Q: �} i.. Zli Y y� Z a` V LL Q i1_r y O N N d W Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore EXPERIENCE The RHA team has completed over a 100 park projects that involve a wide range of park elements and features planned for Serenity Park. The design team members assigned to this project have direct experience in the specific elements and amenities that are proposed. The following are several representative projects that highlight this extensive experience. Lake Forest Park Renovations RHA was retained by the City of Lake Forest to prepare Master Plans and Renovation Plans for 4 parks in the city. The projects were divided into 2 separate contracts with each contract containing 2 park sites, Concourse and Mountain View Parks & Tamarisk and Rimgate Parks. RHA led the city staff and the community residents through a series of public workshops to determine what the desired improvements would be for the parks. Meetings were held at the park sites as well as at the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings and City Council meetings. Individual interviews were also done with some surrounding residents to obtain their direct input on how the improvements would affect them. Once the planning process was completed, construction documents were prepared RHA directed a consultant team consisting of civil, geotechnical and electrical engineering. Client: City of Lake Forest Contact: Doug Erdman, Principal Civil Engineer - (949) 282-5233 Status: Construction Completed in 2012 and 2014 Project Manager: Doug Grove Project Staff: Dave Black, Lauren McHugh View Park RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Experience 17 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore June 8, 2015 Grape Day Park Master Plan and Playground Renovations RHA was retained by the City of Escondido to prepare a Master Plan for the renovation of Grape Day Park, the city's oldest park. The project is located in downtown Escondido and is adjacent to City Hall. RHA led the city staff and the community residents through a series of public workshops to determine what the desired improvements would be for the park. Meetings were held at the park site as well as at the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings and City Council meetings. The Master Plan completed, RHA is now preparing construction documents for the expanded playground and surrounding walkways and plaza. Client: City of Escondido Contact: Loretta McKinney, Director- (760) 839-4834 Status: Master Plan Completed in 2015, Construction Documents being prepared Project Manager: Doug Grove Project Staff: Dave Black, Lauren McHugh a RIIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Experience 18 Design Services—Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Fergusson Park RHA lead a multi -disciplinary design team in the development and expansion of Fergusson Park in Rialto. The team included Engineering, Electrical, and Skate Park design. The park includes two regulation football fields, bleacher seating, shade covers, restroom/concession building, meeting and storage buildings, basketball courts, playground, picnic shelters, skatepark and parking. Client: City of Rialto Contact: Mike Story, (909) 820-2689 Project Manager: Doug Grove Project Staff: Dave Black, Lauren McHugh RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Experience 19 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Client Reference Arroyo Grande Dirt Purnp Track & Jump Park at the Whitney Mesa Recreation Area I HenderSan, NV Benjamin raytor, PE Project Manager Th,,Aroyo(trnndeDirrYuolPaud Jump Park in;usnunumiry hfke PaIR onsisling Jacobs Engineering Group ofove, dirt'j"111plows unique in layuutlhatprooides for bogiuuor, nternludf ale and adwmer dirt lump riders. 'Lhu parr: was completely mbultt in p:(702)93&5417 December2,0L;with ai'proprie(e clay nilv.,ennp:lotion and 5oiltaebinderwith revised O: bHn laYlorC JaCoh5.corn nldulage sysi,nn nligatiml Nick"'uplerntilb.tier serve th¢ cmmmum(lti sndmingate mnintennncc. 111ClllaNetotbC 1,,ojo,IiS wfirstasph:dt coat2d PlllnP IIACI(OlttSdC OC(v Cl'1llC11/LO oirset nlai IIIC•nance. 'Phe lo50o Sq. {l. pump tract:hes'vsteruat andinternal cross lnnpa Irl CCt'ale a Illliq ni' rid Ing e::P2ri['.I1Ce Ill fGtl�hO¢(r bB PIi nip I NCI<. RHA I,,ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Experience 20 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements June 8, 2015 Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore Chon Reioronco Novant Health BMX Supercross Track I nock w i,sc John David the BMX track, forerhlch we Drovided Planninfl,desin�hlandtt•apo mehilecture, Chief operalinCq Olicor parlanaSCL`t'plfnIDini; and pUn.'tntetimt docun'tent s,isaneltherinstdhnen[ in the American, merican Bicycle oommmnity's$4 million Rockhill Ouuioor Centro' at Rivenvart,, ioalulawtrailti Association to mountain Hh<ecourac, and the Giordana Velodrome The Ohooiiclovel r,%IX Suportr'ack is vets spacial, as irivili he open to event the youngest mmnbers oftho p:(480)9G1-14(13x1)2 commun3tAAddltimtally, the 0lympictrialwmYhl, eontplos will attract familiesto Rock Hill lar thee... nicnec o4a ireining site nmvby. 'rho plan calls for a 32root tall atorti ng hili for Prol'eUionaI and Olympic trial usoa mtd a `tcor}ddass' training tach with it emallvi _=tariinglt ill for local chiltlmn as yonn(c its 5 yahns old in;w clfurt to Snarl thorn iu the xpm1. The Ouly other tittpcn;mssl'vM111y, rue by the IJ,4. Olympic oommittoll, is in Chill it Vista, CA anti limits access to Olympiens in II inning and some exclusive eveol S. The BMIXI ileo eourke Cs bohI2 built with mmtey from a spec Gat ttx district wont a 2009 hoild —so far, 5135,61)1 has been spent'19te Rocki sill City Council unproved a dti'elopnu;nt agreement with USA BAIN 1'ar the urgz nizat iron t0 invest Li me mus "pet 0,,e in tht < ittsproJecl.Ill tAwl("ia) Ill, altnc are Ili" ate tsd to pay $]:Q000 oven, Ihr nc V sewn F'. n59 for aaininl, rights ro fhc Soot mrnSa Uncl:. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Experience 21 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore June 8, 2015 FINANCIAL STABILITY RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. is a California Corporation and has been in business for 36 years. The RHA organizational system utilizes a team approach. Under principal management, our project assignments are organized into teams of professionals, with each team led by a principal. RHA maintains a high ratio of one licensed landscape architect to designers. RHA STAFF Randy Hlubik, RLA Doug Grove, RLA David Black, RLA Lauren McCullough, RLA Jennifer Iklady Whitney Redfield Kathi O'Haver President/Landscape Architect Principal/Landscape Architect/LEED AP Project Manager/Landscape Architect Project Manager/Landscape Architect Project Manager/Designer Designer Accounting RHA has never had a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy petition filed in its current or any prior name. RHA, or any team member, is not in default on any loan agreement or financing agreement with any bank, financial institution, or other entity. No parent company or subsidiaries have been refused liability coverage in its current or previous name(s). RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Financial Stability 22 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS June 8, 2015 a. Has any owner, officer or partner of your organization ever been an owner, officer or partner of this or any other organization that failed to complete a construction contract or paid liquidated damages? If yes, please provide additional information on a separate sheet. 1•G b. Has the company, any principal, any parent company, or any subsidiary ever been denied a surety bond? m c. Have any of the principals ever had a claim made against them by their bonding company or had the bonding company threaten to bring a claim? No d. Has your firm ever been named in a lawsuit by any local, state, or the federal government or other public entity for civil fraud, violation of any false claims act or related statute, or any other tort claim? No e. Has your organization ever engaged in litigation against a city, county, state or other municipality? If yes, then identify the lawsuit or proceeding on a separate sheet. No I2HA LANDSCAPE ARCIiITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Additional Questions 23 Design Services — Serenity Park Improvements Cathy McCarthy — City of Lake Elsinore PROPOSED FEES AND COSTS Task 1— Design Development . . . . . . $25,269 LS Topographic Survey $2,500 Landscape Architecture $6,505 Bike Park Design $11,386 Civil Engineering $3,528 Meetings (3) $1,350 Task 2 — Construction Documents . . . . . $40,444 LS Landscape Architecture $20,220 Civil Engineering $7,600 Electrical $7,400 As -Built Drawings $3,970 Meetings (4) $1,350 Reimbursable Expenses. . . . . . . . $4,000 LS TOTAL FEE: . . . . . . . . . . . $69,713 LS June 8, 2015 Items that may not be needed (to be determined after Design Development) Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) $4,848 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) $4,848 Note that the SWPPP can be required of the contractor and included in the construction budget RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Proposed Fees and Costs AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RHA Landscape Architects Planner, Inc. Serenity Park Phase 11 Park Improvements This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and RHA Landscape Architects Planners, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: Conceptual design, design development and delivery of construction documents for Serenity Park Improvements. B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, dated June 8, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. ATTACHMENT - RHA Professional Services Agreement Page 1 C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed seventy nine thousand four hundred nine dollars ($79,409) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. Reserved. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, Page 2 actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 8. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually Page 3 agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 11. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 12. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into Page 4 this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 15. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 16. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its Page 5 officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: RHA Landscape Architects Planners Attn: Doug Grove 6750 Indiana Avenue, Suite 160 Riverside, California 92506 18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. Page 7 19. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 20. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 21. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 22. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 23. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 24. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 25. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 26. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 27. Authority to Enter Aqreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 28. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 30. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ('Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 31. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. [Signatures on next page] o IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A— Consultant's Proposal "CONSULTANT" RHA Landscape Architects Planners, Inc., a corporation By: Its: Page 10 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS [ATTACHED] i7 > Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 7) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-646 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6/18/2815 cl"]y OF LTL LIROK-E _ 1) 1' [' M [.X'1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: ANNUAL CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Recommendations Approve and award the Agreement for Contractor Services to West Coast Arborist in the amount of $85,000 (plus 10% contingency, for a total budget of $93,500) for Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such form as approved by the City Attorney. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments not to exceed 10% contingency, as needed for emergency/extra work. Background In 1988, the City Council established the Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting Maintenance District ("Citywide LLMD") for the purpose of maintaining public right-of- ways and public facilities, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The City contracts tree maintenance services to provide the expertise and personnel necessary to perform this high-volume maintenance work. This reduces the City's ongoing personnel and equipment costs and allows the City to vary the level of services based on available funding and need. Discussion In order to ensure the City is receiving the best available services and pricing, Staff recently updated the tree maintenance services scope of work and solicited competitive bids from qualified contractors. On May 14, 2015, the City received the following three (3) bids: Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services June 23, 2015 Page 2 Contractor Tree Trimming West Coast Arborist $54.00 Mariposa Landscape, Inc. $67.50 Tree Pros Inc. $77.00 Tree Removal Tree Planting $19.00 $134.00 $25.00 $150.00 $28.00 $155.00 The bids were evaluated based upon competitive pricing, understanding of scope, direct experience, ability to provide manpower and equipment to timely complete the work, and qualifications. After careful review of the three (3) main services: tree trimming, tree planting and tree removal, staff determined that West Coast Arborists has the lowest competitive bid. Under the revised scope of work, the City's tree inventory will be brought up-to-date while adding the benefit of a global positioning system location and creating a maintenance schedule that works within our budget. West Coast Arborists has performed tree maintenance services exceptionally well for the City of Lake Elsinore since 1999. Fiscal Impact Tree maintenance services are included in the FY15/16 Citywide LLMD and Parks Division Operating budgets. Future contract extensions will be in coordination with the City's budget cycle. Prepared by: Rick De Santiago Public Works Superintendent Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Attachment 'A' - Agreement for Contractor Services with West Coast Arborist ATTACHMENT'A' AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES West Coast Arborists, Inc. Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services This Agreement for Contractor Services (the "Agreement') is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and West Coast Arborists, Inc., a Corporation ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires the following services: Planting and ongoing maintenance of trees in the public right-of-way, parks, and other areas of significant importance in our community. B. Contractor has submitted to City a proposal, dated May 14, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Contractor's Proposal') and incorporated herein, to provide services and related work to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Contractor possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services and related work described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Contractor to perform the services and related work as provided herein and Contractor desires to provide such services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Contractor shall perform the services and related work described in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A). Contractor shall provide such services and related work at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the services and related work to be performed by Contractor is an essential condition of this Agreement. Contractor shall prosecute regularly and diligently the services and related work contemplated pursuant to this Agreement consistent with Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A) and shall provide, furnish and pay all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all taxes, utility and transportation services required to perform such the services and related work. b. Performance Schedule. Contractor shall commence the services and related work pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services and related work within the time period(s) established in the Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Contractor, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 1 C. Term. Unless earlier terminated as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for a period of One (1) year, commencing on June 23, 2015 and ending on June 30, 2016. The City may, at its sole discretion, extend the term of this Agreement on a 12 -month basis not to exceed Four (4) additional twelve (12) month renewal terms by giving written notice thereof to Contractor not less than thirty (30) days before the end of the contract term, such notice to be exercised by the City Manager. Contractor hereby agrees and acknowledges that any and all work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be based upon the issuance of a project task order by the City. Contractor acknowledges that it is not guaranteed any minimum or specific amount of work or services as all work or services shall be authorized through task order issued by the City. 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Contractor shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Contractor's compensation exceed EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND dollars ($85,000) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Contractor's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Contractor, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Contractor for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 2 Contractor or to any other party. Contractor shall, at Contractor's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Contractor, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"), Contractor shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Contractor or provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Contractor. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Contractor for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Contractor which is otherwise known to Contractor or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Contractor shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Contractor's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Contractor's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Contractor's Books and Records. a. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor to this Agreement. b. Contractor shall maintain all performance under this Agreement for a minimurr period required by law, from the date of termination Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 3 documents and records which demonstrate period of three (3) years, or for any longer or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Contractor's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Contractor's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Contractor, Contractor's representatives, or Contractor's successor -in -interest. 8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Contractor, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Contractor and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Contractor. Contractor (including principals, associates and management employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Contractor's services hereunder. Contractor further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Contractor is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Contractor: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 4 b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 11. Ability of Contractor. City has relied upon the training and ability of Contractor to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Contractor shall therefore provide properly skilled personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Contractor under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent contractors in Contractor's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor represents and warrants to City that Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Contractor shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Contractor, at Contractor's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Contractor shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 5 and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Contractor for City. In the event that Contractor is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Contractor shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Contractor arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 6 iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Contractor shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Contractor: West Coast Arborist, Inc. Attn: Mr. Patrick D. Mahoney 2200 E. Via Burton Street Anaheim, CA 92806 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Contractor. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Contractor and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the reputation, experience and competence Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 7 of Contractor and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23, Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance services Page 8 27. Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ('Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Contractor agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Contractor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. [Signatures on next page] Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CONTRACTOR" "CITY" West Coast Arborists, a Corporation CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Contractor's Proposal Exhibit B — List of Subcontractors By: Its: Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Page 10 EXHIBIT A CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A ANNUAL TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES BID SCHEDULE (TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL) BIDDER: West Coast Arborists, Inc. (Contractor Name) ITEM ND CODE DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT UNIT CE 1 Grid Tree Trimming EACH $54.00 2 Service Request Trimming 2a 0 - 12" DBH EACH $174.00 2b 13" -24 " DBH EACH $174.00 2c 25" - 36" DBH EACH $174.00 2d 37" DBH and over EACH $174.00 4 Tree Raising EACH $34.00 5 Palm Tree Trimming EACH $54.00 6 Palm Tree Skinning I Shaping EACH $194.00 7 Palm tree seed pod only removal EACH $34.00 8 Tree and Stump Removal DBH per INCH $26.00 9 Tree only Removal DBH per INCH $19.00 10 Stump only Removal DSH per INCH $14.00 11 Plant 15 gallon tree with root barrier EACH $144.00 12 Plant 15 gallon tree EACH $134.00 13 Plant 24" box tree with root barrier EACH $284.00 14 Plant 24" box tree EACH 274.00 15 Plant 36" box tree EACH $744.00 16 Root Pruning LINEAR FOOT $24.00 17 Crew Rental — per person HOUR $64.00 Page 16 All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Projects (if applicable), and Specifications set forth in this bid package (See Annual Tree Maintenance Contract, Attachment "C' thereto for the Specifications.) The budget for the project is flexible and is dependent upon the City Council approved tree maintenance budget. Page 17 CODE DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT UNIT F PRICE Emergency Crew Rental — per person -- regular business hours HOUR $64.00 19 Emergency Crew Rental - per person - After HOUR $94.00 hours, Weekends and Holidays 20 Specialty Equipment Rental HOUR $144.00 21 Arborist Services (report writing) HOUR $144.00 22 GPS Inventory and continuous updates EACH $3.00 All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Projects (if applicable), and Specifications set forth in this bid package (See Annual Tree Maintenance Contract, Attachment "C' thereto for the Specifications.) The budget for the project is flexible and is dependent upon the City Council approved tree maintenance budget. Page 17 EXHIBIT B LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS [ATTACHED] N/A EXHIBIT B City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore. org Text File File Number: ID# 14-647 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 8) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6/18/2015 CIT, 0f i,A�L Ls DiiLAM Ey,TRBME- REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with HR Green California, Inc., for engineering, project support, and plan check services in the amount of $242,080, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background / Discussion HR Green is a municipal services firm servicing local public agencies specializing in the delivery of projects. HR Green has been supporting the Engineering Services Division of the Public Works Department providing City Engineering and Public Works Director support while the City actively recruits to fill open positions. The firm is actively moving projects through the design process and into construction. In addition, there are a number of active commercial and industrial projects in the City requiring land use engineering support. The firm proposes the use of Mr. Roy Stephenson, PE, to work closely with Community Development staff up to two days each week to streamline and assist with the project entitlement process. Please refer to the attached list of active project applications. Mr. Stephenson would work directly with the City Planner and the Community Development Director to assist with project conditions of approval, review of reports and technical studies, and attend developer initiated meetings. It is anticipated that up to 64 hours each month may be needed to coordinate the anticipated land development project work between the planners and engineer. The cost would be paid through developer deposits. Furthermore, HR Green provides electronic plan checking, which improves service and adds value to development services provided by reducing the amount of paper, time, travel, and costs associated with the plan check process, while enhancing Amendment No. 2 Professional Services Agreement — HR Green June 23, 2015 Page 2 communications among City Staff and the development community. Electronic plan check software provides a centralized site through which plans are submitted, reviewed, checked, and approved. The use of the virtual cloud also promotes real time project tracking. The cost of the service is 75% of the deposited funds collected, the same cost as other firms doing business with the City. The difference, however, is reduced plan review time, enhanced communication with the development community, and improved delivery schedules. An annual budget has been set at $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2015/16, the cost of which will be paid by developer deposits. Fiscal Impact The annual cost for these added services will be paid by fees collected from developers. There is no impact to the General Fund for land use engineering services. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Public Works Director Approved by: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Attachment A - HR Green - Amendment No. 2 to PSA Attachment B — Active List of Land Use Applications ATTACHMENT'A' AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HR GREEN, CALIFORNIA, INC. Engineering and Project Services This Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Professional Services ("Amendment No. 2") is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City), and HR Green, California, Inc., a corporation ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City and Consultant have entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Services dated as of April 8, 2015 (the "Original Agreement"). Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Original Agreement. B. The Original Agreement provided for compensation to Consultant in an amount of Thirty Thousand dollars ($30,000). C. Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement provided for compensation to Consultant in an amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand dollars ($120,000), for a total contract amount of One Hundred Fifty Thousand dollars ($150,000). D. The parties now desire to modify the scope of services and increase the payment for such services as set forth in this Amendment No 2. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Section 1, Scope of Services, of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to add the following: Consultant shall also perform the services described in Consultant's June 10, 2015 Proposal (attached to this Amendment No. 2 as Exhibit A-1). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A-1, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Section 3, Compensation, of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A to the Original Agreement) and Consultant's June 10, 2015 Proposal (Exhibit A-1 to Amendment No. 2). In no event shall Consultant's compensation related to Exhibit A to the Original Agreement and Amendment No. 1 exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand dollars ($150,000) without additional written authorization from the City. ATTACHMENT 'A' In no event shall Consultant's compensation related to Exhibit A-1 to the Amendment No. 2 exceed Three Hundred Forty Two Thousand Eighty dollars ($242,080) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary and/or Consultant's June 10, 2015 Proposal to the contrary, out-of-pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit A-1, respectively, shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed on the respective dates set forth below. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager Date: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney "CONSULTANT" HR Green, California, Inc., a corporation George A. Wentz, P.E., Vice President Date: Attachments: Exhibit A-1 — Consultant's June 10, 2015 Proposal Exhibit B —Amendment No.1 Exhibit C — Original Agreement ATTACHMENT 'A' EXHIBIT A-1 CONSULTANT'S JUNE 10, 2015 PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A-1 1XHIBIT A HRGreen June 10, 2015 Mr. Grant Yates City Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject: Proposal to Provide Land Development Engineering Services Dear Mr. Yates, HR Green is pleased to provide the Services of an experienced professionally licensed Civil Engineer to provide engineering support to the City of Lake Elsinore's fast growing land development activities. HR Green is proposing to provide the services of Roy F. Stephenson, PE for two days a week of engineering support to the Community Development Director in the processing of Land Development applications. Mr. Stephenson is senior level engineer at our firm and brings more than 40 years of experience in processing both large and small commercial, residential, and mix use developments. He has also met with Grant Taylor and Richard MacHott of the City and is available to start immediately. In addition to Mr. Stephenson's services we propose to provide electronic plan review of land development maps, grading, and street improvement plans. This paperless solution results in both time saved in transmitting of plans and the related cost of paper and reproduction services. HR Green currently provides similar services to the County of Orange's Rancho Mission Viejo 22,000 Acre Master Planned Community as well as other agencies. Mr. Stephenson's hourly billing rate for the services proposed is $185/hour. We anticipate a need for approximately 64 hours per month. However, he would be available for additional time should it become necessary based on workload. The cost of electronic map and plan check is 75% of City deposit base fee. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City. 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1025, Orange, CA 92868 Phone: 855.900.HRGC (4742) E -Mail: rstephenson@hrgreen.com ATTACHMENT 'A' *39"rwl- AMENDMENT NO. 1 [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT B F,XHIBtT B AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC. ENGINEERING AND PROJECT SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made and entered into as of April 28, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC.. ("Consultant"), in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On April 8, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Professional Services" (the "Original Agreement'). Section 3. Compensationof the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The compensation to the agreement shall be increased by One Hundred Twenty Thousand, and No Cents ($120,000). The total compensation will equal One Hundred Fifty Thousand, and No Cents ($150,000). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant es, City Manager "CONSULTANT" HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC. I Georg A. Went Vi President CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL See Original Proposal Professional Engineering Services for Delivery of Capital Projects and plan reviews. Staffing hours payable on an hourly basis up to but not exceeding $150,000. City Engineer $165 hourly Project Manager $160 hourly Special Projects Advisor $170 hourly ICC, f.dPCI J CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PTEImmuo' YY) �•-^" 09/?212095 THIS CER7IPICATE IS ISSUED ASA MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CUNPF:RS NO RIGHTS UPON 'fHE GERTIPICATE HOLDER- THIS CEF2TIFIGATE DOES NOT' ApFIRMAT'IVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND 012 AL.I'ER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIRCA7E OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT' BGiWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: tf the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the Pol11.VII s) roust be endorsed. If SUBROGATIONlS WAIVED, subJect to the terms and conditions of the policy; certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement Dn th(s cettiGcata dors not confer rights to the COltlfleate holes, fn Ileo of such oudorsement(s). _ PIiODUCER 1.-000-300-0325 GDBYACI —�- 1lAMf M cholic Gruiv ItOlmOs Mssgohy & AaSOC .. CR PNORC 319-Re6 (�G.No L V _.... ._ I luc, N ). 866-231 7822 LAIAII 500 let Avenue NE, Suite 30(I APORFSs• mgruin(v]tolJaanmorpiLy.com _- INSUREIRS)AIi URUING COYERAGf NAIC4 _- Cedar Rapids lA 62401 INSURERA, Zurich American insurance Comp n _ iG 3a INSURED )"SUR ESU '12avelars Property casualty Company of 95674 HA Crean Znc ... INSURER XL .Specialty Sn¢urance, Company 39805 _ ----- 0710 Barhart Lane SW WSVRHin P.O. Box 9009 wsxar:a c, I � 1vvcrwaama CERT IP ICA TE NUMBER: 44008800 REVISION NU�FOR IRIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED ¢FLOW HAV[ BEEN ISSUED 70 THE lNSUftED NAMED ABOV7111? POLICY Pf?RIOU INDICATEf]. NUTWITH57ANDING ANY REUtJIlUSMENI', TERM OR CONDITION OI' ANY , NI'RACI OR UTHER DOCUMENT WITECTTUVJIiICHTHISCERTIFICATEMAYBEISSIlEO Oh'MAY PERTAINTHE INSUANCAF'ORDEOBYTHES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUTO Alt. TIiF TERAI5, EXCLUSIONS ANDGUNDD'IONS OP SUCH POLICIES. t IMnS slanwnl MAv umA= accnl ... ...... Ron "RE MERCIALGENEUmmERAI Uge1LITY SUBi�Ol/01/15POLICY 1 /01/�1PI]y VOLI4YNUMBFN MMNM LIMITS GL0373096705 G EACH OCCURItENC t $ 1,000 000f1 ANISMADC X OCCUR ONUAGB TOTFCNFED �"'"'_-$300 ) 000 FqL� MtDEXP(yono ve a) 310000TAPi GR� TEFRMUT APPI iES PfR � Y JECT f g JLOC PER ONAL A ADS INJURY g 1 000 000 G Nf RAI AGGREGATE $ 2,000 000 2000 000 RILE LIABILITY tBAP373096805 0]/01(16 ;[e)MBINFf,IN LE LIM4g 000 000 ~ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCI[FOULED I01/O1/15 BODILY INJURY tear pcwe AUTOS AUTOS IX NONOIVVCU I _ DOUILY INJURY (Por d 0 $ NIfiEU AUTOS X AUTOS 4�� X UMBREtAL X 01/01/15 201/01/16 EACH OCCURRENCE g 15,000 000 EXCESS llA6 CLAIM tAAill: '- 1 I DED � REiEUTION 10, 000 � - - AG6REgATL g 15,000 000 _.-_ WORKERS COMPENSATION IWC3 /3096665 —_- A AND EMPLOYER LIAOIUTY Y1N1 / % PER UTN — O1 OS/15 OlJdl/16 C)Al Ulk. ER $ XErUTNF __ �C1 �AIJYIROPRIrTO-UPARTNrR OPPICCRA4CMDER EXCLUDED? N/AI I EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000 000 U c.dt l NET y s. desrn6 nd¢ _ DE'CRIPI ION OF OPrAATiONSF4nv ___ E_L DISCASF' to EMPLOYEES 1, Opo 000 : h.L 015EASC YOUCY11610 � $ 1,000,000 C Professional Liability DYR9718196 ItClaima Made Coverages) __ 61/1 01/16 i8ar Clnirn"- 5, Otl0, 000 Assrasates s,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS LOCATIONSVEHICLES (ACORD 1:11, Nldiaonal fEmnalka Schedule, moy On :afnchM if mor¢slwuds wRui,Nj The City, its elecl:ad or appointed Officers, official¢, eaployeoa, agents and volvntsere are included as Additional Lneureds on the General Liability and Auto Liability On a primary and non -contributor basis as re Y ,Sired by written contract with the insured, par policy teLNx and conditions. The General. Liability and Auto Liability includes a Waiver Of Subrogation in favor of the additional insuredo an required by w.itton contract. CERTIPICATF HM ❑FA ---"" ----------- City of Lake E.l.ninore Attn: City ifanager 130 South Main Street Lake Vlsinoro, CA 92530 USA SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BF_FORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AU1110NVED RFPRG9ENYATIVE �W 1UvU-Zi14 AL;ORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved, ACORD 25 (2014/09) The ACORD namo and logo are registered marks of ACORD khrowarcr 44008800 Once the attached documents have been reviewed, please sign and return to Public Works, at ext. 241 Reviewing Department Signature Date 6/82015 Public Works Review City Attorney City Manager U ho City Clerk U �p' NAME OF VENDOR: SUPPORT DOCUMENTS: Insurance(s) Business License: W-9: HR Yes j ATTACHMENT'A' EXHIBIT C ORIGINAL AGREEMENT [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT C PXIIII3IT C AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC, This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of April 6, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and HR Green California, Inc. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has detennined that it requires the following professional services: professional engineering staffing services. 13. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule, Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. c. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). I-112 Gwen Mok tot wt Jounces Aymr'J_015(2j.dacx Page 1 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($30,000) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out-of-pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method _ of ._Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. 5. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Prooeity. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium Page 2 of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 7. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minirnum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of file above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's suocessor-in-interest. Page 3 8. IAM9ndent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of incorne, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perforin any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring, and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(x)(2).) 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perforin the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirernents and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local Taws, codes, ordinances and regulations. Page 4 13. Licenses, Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the tern of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. '14. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. I. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. J. General Liability era e. Consultant shall maintain commercial gene.ial liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per Page 5 occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and properly damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11188) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1173) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"), No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iv. Professional _- Liability CoveraaLqe. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: J. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. Page 6 V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92.530 If to Consultant: HR Green California, Inc. Attn: George A. Wentz 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1025 Orange, CA 92868 17. George A. Wentz Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed lay both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assir{nment_ and Subconhacting. Theparties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit 13. Consultant shall be Page 7 fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the pail of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Exuenses an d Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including Court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. 'The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority io Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action an behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 27, Prohibited. Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide omployee working solely for Page 8 Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid not, has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity_ Et Ioyrngnt. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall riot discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recrultment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. Prevailing_ Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, at seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30, Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation _. Y _. Grant City Maa-nager ATT -ST: "CONSULTANT" HR Green California Inc. George A. ntz PE Vice President Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Proposal Page '10 05-01-2015 HR Green California, Inc. Officer -Director Listing and Business Ownership Name Title Steven R. Heyer President Douglas Tholo Vice President - Director Michelle Ryard Treasurer George A. Wentz Secretary - Vice President Gerald Kneeland Vice President Richard L. White Vice President— Director David Moermond Vice President — Director Jason Poppen Vice President —Director James Hoving Vice President James Rasmussen Vice President Ownership Green Companies, Inc. Parent company —100%ownership EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] March 26, 2015 Mr. Grant Yates City Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject: Proposal, Professional Engineering Staffing Services & Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Dear Mi. Yates: till Groan California, im, is pleased to submit this proposal for staffing and support services to provide for the delivery of Capital Projects and as needed staff augmentation. We are uniquely qualified for this assignment for the following reasons: i'rr*Mt FarYi$iiarF2y – HR Green has a long history of successful working relationships and has worked on many capital improvement and development projects. Our team has worked to meet day to day and technical demands of City Engineering departments throughout Southern California. ;�rgiecf ?"- are – We have provided a unique team of professionals that include registered engineers, administrators, public work directors, certified water quality experts, and support staff. While most of the 350+HR Green staff members have worked with municipal clients, many of our staff has also worked directly for a government entity, which gives us a Unique perspective on how we should provide services to our public sector clients. The experience and expertise of this team will be critical to addressing the immediate delivery requirements of the CIP. Ftmding Success–We have secured and/or provided assistance to cities to obtain grant funding for capital projects. Over the past 10 years HR Green has secured over $200 million in grant funding for its municipal clients. Having the knowledge and success with funding will position Lake Elsinore in maximizing its revenue source to implement a successful and expedited CIP plan. A,M-1,rimch –We have provided an Integrated Planning approach for your consideration and provide you with optimum flexibility. Having conducted an initial review and evaluation of your operations we have a good understanding of the support that would best meet your immediate needs and be available to you – at your discretion. We understa rid your specific need to provide the immediate staff support you require and to address the CIP planning for your$50 million FY 14-15 program and project delivery strategy for streets, pavement, sidewalk and other. We propose to help with the delivery of projects to maximize the utilization of your available bond funds. It will service you well and help you meet your broader vision, goals and objectives - consistent with the expectations of elected leaders. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to continue working with the City of Lake Elsinore. Sincerely, 1100 Town R Country R¢,id, suite 102" George A. Wentz, PE vire-President Orangte, CA 928G8 »a.2az22Ps is uweot?roh riireen.coIII City of Lake Elsinore Cover Letter Table of Contents 1 Firno(}ven�evvand [!ua\i0cationo~—^.-~.'—..~~--^~.......~~.-~...~~.. 1 Rr/nProfi|e—.—.......~~.--...—^^~..'—^.,---^~,~,__—~_ 2 Px�ectExperience .—..-----..—^..—.--~.—~...',~~~^~,__~_ 7 Our Approach toDe|�ued"QC"p�a|Prn|ects~~..~..~....~...-~~~.~.--~~.... 1l Scope*fVVu,k......—^.~...~_.~^^~~°^.^_..~~.^..—._.~......-..~.- l5 G*sunFeeS�hed"}* les~..~.^-~~^~^~~~~~~~~~-~~~^~~^~~—^~~^~~~~~^'~~~~~~~--~~� �8 -..~........-~~.~.~..-.~~.......--.._.~-~~~...~.-~� 01 1 o , City of Lake Elsinore IIiIC[� (,II{t11�1: In business for more than 100 yeas s -.i,, siw, (HR Green) perinially ranks as one of Engineering Netvs Record's Top 300 Design and 1"op 100 Construction Management Firms in the-. United States. 'Me firm has roughly 355 employees and 15 offices throughout the United States, including a Southern California office. HR Green has maintained California operations since 2004, and in 2012 established a separate Galifoi nia curpoiate entry, HR Green California, Inc. From a Public Works/Engineering standpoint, our staff members include registered engineers, certified water quality developers/practitioners(QSD/QSP) and accessibility (CASp) specialists. HR Green staff members have played a key role in the evolution and growth of agencies throughout Southern California. Code Interpretations Building Plan Review Organizational Review Building Inspection Chief Building Official Permit and Counter Staffing CASp Assessment and Consulting - Public Education and Outreach Staff Training Standards and Procedures Development Mplweq ;:1:t7?i�E?rta4,) L7m:�i;.'i.'Y.'4a: ` Departmental Management Interim Staff Support Staff Augmentation / Shared Services Organizational Reviews/ Analysis Fee and Rate Reviews CIP Funding and Administration Alternative Service Delivery Regulatory Compliance Growth and Impact Analysis Civil and Transportation Engineering Grant Writing and Administration Stormwater Quality Management: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Operations/Maintenance Management i %2 'eYst, x Ia�4)�f '�y'+,t; a fSJ Entitlement Grading Drainage NPDIS / Water Quality Compliance LID / Hydromodification Sewer ,. Water Traffic Map Standards and Procedures Development ME ° .. . m„ Establish Processes Investigations Reports Automated Tracking System Staff Augmentation Cost Rpge+�covery Analysis O . Constructability Review Construction Administration Inspection Quality Assurance / Quality Control Claims Management Resident Engineering Owner's Representative Site Management City of Lake Elsinore I N KI From strategic planning through delivery of a successful project, we bring our public agency clients a full range of integrated services that address their needs, no matter how big or small. A cornerstone of our expertise is the provision of on-call professional engineering services to 50+ California agencies. Our firm and staff is noted throughout: SOUlhern California for our ability to successfully build consensus among a variety of public agency, regulatory, permitting, and community stakeholders and oversee the successful delivery of community sensitive projects. ._ 4K i. E . e tia t� § .. Since being founded in 9.91.3 HR Green has long maintained a strong and vibrant financial condition. Last year's revenue exceeded $55 million. out finm continues to have a strong balance sheet, is well capitalized, and is very well positioned to fulfill all of its obligations. Due to our aggressive financial discipline, our balance sheet remains strongand healthy. We have no conditions that would impede our ability to complete your assignments. Below is a representative list of agencies our staff members have served over the years along with the breadth of services provided. City of Lake Elsinore City of Jurupa Valley Dates: 2011. -- Ongoing Sv4�..R.1,f 2 `.\� { Building Official Plan Review (Building and Civil) Inspection (Building and Civil) Permit Counter Support Water Quality Studies Code Compliance - NPDf_S Compliance V Traffic Engineering Construction Management Building Official Civil Engineering / Design Grant Funding Departmental Management .•' CIP Administration Public Works Maintenance s Value Engineering GIS -^ Transition ul�l `�IIVItItJ Manage only California city to provide 100% of Its municipal services through Alternative Service Delivery providers / Second most cost- efficient city in Riverside County based on cost of service per capita Since 2011 City incorporation Hit G ecn provides full departmental management: and on-site staffing for Building & Safety, Public Works, and Engineering Coordinated transition of all services from County to City _. Bridget, administer and manage CIP program; value engineering and permitting for road, drainage, water, wastewater, and park projects; plan review; traffic studies; utility coordination; establish development guidelines/protocols; review of Water Quality Management Plans; GIS implementation; permitting and inspections Design pavement rehabilitation projects citywide Coordinate project improvements, service delivery, and maintenance with multiple special districts 100% compliance providing permit inspections within 24 hours 100% success rate meeting plan review turnaround schedule Assign an engineering bench of 10+ on-site staff to deliver CIP and land development projects Budget, administer and manage $7.2 million CIP program; value engineering and permitting for road, drainage, water, wastewater, and park projects; plan review; traffic studies; utility coordination; establish development guidelines/protocols; review of Water Quality Management Plans; GIS implementation; permitting and inspections Developed Local Implementation Plan and provide NPDFS compliance inspection Prepare grant applications and have precured $4 r million in federal and state funding to date Design, const:ruCtion management, and inspection of $2 million in pavement rehabilitation projects citywide Coordinate project improvements, service delivery, and maintenance with multiple special districts 100% compliance providing pennit inspections within 24 hours t i; ur City of Lake Elsinore 11il�Er 1 �Ilit_�ta_ �sr ; 100%success rate meeting 15/10/5 plan review turnaround schedule Reduced overall operational costs by approximately 35% Costs in pet rnit processing and inspection fees to applicants due to shorter tuniaround times and lower costs .- an estimated 20 -- 35% reduction Less time taken in responding to resident inquires and in processing development applications Staffing level flexibility to right -size quickly for dynamically changing needs and priorities Increased development activity / Processed 2,000 t new residential units past year City of Placentia Dates: 2011— Ongoing ti,,: �bi;t, `� i Vs.�t.RIM' Development Development Review Plan Review (Building & Civil) +% Water Quality Studies Permit Processing City Engineering CIP Administration Construction Management Program Management Value Engineering Grant Funding ✓ Departmental Management - mi G eert provides as -needed city/civil engineering, project management, and city engineering Project management for $16 million Metrolink station and five railroad grade separation projects (award-winning OC Bridges Projects) valued at over $400 million -- Oversees CIP design; and provides plan checking, specification review, and construction oversight Represents the City to assure that these projects cornply with City standards and guidelines Extensive collaboration with orange Countyl ransportation Authority, multiple cities, utilities, and water agencies to facilitate permits and improvements Oversaw$6.5 million in street rehabilitation it citywide through gas tax funding Oversees pavement rehabilitation design and construction, including the .$400,000 Richfield Road widening over the OCFD Channel City of take Elsinore I11Q_ � I �II�i[�IZL .- 4� Combining engineering expertise with unparalleled strength in municipal planning and funding, we assist our local government clients in implementing successful projects and developing effective Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs). The CIP process aids a community in making sound annual budget decisions, thus providing the ability to stabilize debt and consolidate projects to reduce borrowing costs. By utilizing a well-documented CIP, a community can focus on preserving their infrastructure while ensuring the efficient use of public funds. HR Green helps municipalities prepare for the CIP process by providing many communities with services such as providing budget numbers for capital projects, helping staff identify and prioritize projects, and then assisting them with finding funding sources for those projects. The CIP process ensures that various projects reflect the community's short and long-term goals and objectives while planning for a successful implementation and funding strategy. HR Green helps municipalities gather and analyze data that is necessary to ensure that projects be looked at collectively, as opposed to individually, to determine their value to the community. HR Green typically reviews the community's current assets such as roads, bridges, sanitary sewer systems, water mains distribution, waste water treatments plants, lift stations and municipal buildings and grounds as well as vehicle/fleet maintenance. For example, for items such as roads, HR Green has helped communities by reviewing the condition of ail roads and then rating and ranking them according to their condition. This helps the municipalities develop a plan for long-term repair and replacement. The Capital Improvement Plan includes opportunities for u immediate delivery of projects. In delivering the projects, it is important to identify that this plan includes the funding of projects which are related both to the maintenance and replacement of existing assets as well as the evaluation and introduction of new projects, services - and facilities to be able to respond to the increasing needs of a growing and diverse population. This balance is not only desirable but more importantly, necessary if Lake - Elsinore is to retain and expand upon the quality of life which the residents enjoy. Ultimately, the benefit of the CIP is not measured in the number of projects or dollars expended in any single year, but rather is measured cumulatively in achieving the long range goals of the community. Conversely, this is the one of the benefits of having a CIP. It allows for the annual evaluation, prioritization, and scheduling of projects via a uniform, consistent, and objective process. City of Lake Elsinore I N I,,E I ',,I l iL T, l- (='. � : r3it, , r • t_ .��",`_ , t �Ei ,mss t;. 3 ,��q�t °.,��" �. ,. �,_� � i `Some of the features of Lake Flsinol e's OF include: A well-documented "spreadsheet" listing the Capital projects The project ranking in order of preference/priority The plan for financing the projects A time table for the construction or completion of the projects Justification for the projects Fxpianation of expenses for the projects Guiding future community growth and development Encouraging more efficient government and transparency :):i€. !, r�r,:d e" , t'a.a"z5'�€:. Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) is a helpful process that elected officials, administrators and department leaders use to prioritize physical improvement projects and facility needs in their communities for both short-range (typically five to ten years) and long-term planning up to 20 or more year's. Essentially, the plan provides a link between the various community departments and the local government: entity. CIP also provides assurance that the improvements are consistent with the community's short-range and long-term goals. It can be used as a valuable tool to prioritize and plan for capital improvement projects for physical assets including but not limited to roads, sanitary sewer and water nons, sidewalks, storm sewers, vehicles, equipment, public buildings, parks, and water and waste watertreatment plants. Many times, the CIP prioritization process can be somewhat overwhelming for community leaders. Learning from experienced CIP planners, and other communities, may eliminate. common mistakes with this process. Below are some Do's and DON'Ts to consider while undertaking Your CIP process. z ccr i OW'i R rpt iwl,r cit Many leaders like the impact of big roadway reconstr uction projects, since these are sometimes necessary to reduce congestion acid improve i:raffic flow as well as spur economic development However, reconstruction may be one of the least cost effective improvement strategies. For example, crack sealing and rejuvenation can buy a few years of seivice life at $10,000 per mile, milling and resurfacing typically buys 1.0 years of service life at $200,000 per mile, and a reconstruction buys approximately 20 years of service life at $2 million per mile. The best long-term approach may be proactive maintenance. Also, if building a new asset, include projected maintenance and operation expenses for future years' projections to ensure the plan considers the cost to maintain the long-term ability of the community to maintain the asset. ,. raxcr'.,r, :c> .,", ;,;, it, r. „ ., J."t :'i, Consider whelhei a water system interconnect for emergency supply can also facilitate routine system repairs and maintenance. Also, shared usage of major vehicle pinchases or joint hill asiructure improvement programs that help to gain the benefits of economy of scale for bidding can be investigated. It is not just your communil.y that is doing a CIP; there are numerous opportunities to interact with neighboring cominullities or agencies (i.e., RCI D, Caltrans, WRCOG, RCFC&WC), RCIC) to get projects accomplished at a lower cost to all participants. City of Lake ElsinoreWJ TT I 1�111k -this may increase yore probability 0f securing project funding byoutlining ,) more realistic implementation schedule. Not all projects can be phased, but be sure to consider phasing if it is all option. Phasing projects can have a positive effect on the selection process by applying a realistic balance of resource needs over a defined period of time. Consider night work. how, ia.:,q Proi Administrators and elected officials who are mindful of the importance of using these strategic plans to determine when, where and how resource a11OCal lot) Should be targeted, typically want to see connections between funding requests for capital projects and the comprehensive [)fail and strategic needs. Don't just ask for projects and money. Figure out how the project can be financed as well. This criterion can significantly increase the priority of a specific project. Obviously, the more significant. the percentage Of funds secured through external Sources (Such as grants), the more likely a project may be schedUlOd. You will be much more successful in getting projects approved if you also tackle the funding issues upfront. Show and track the grant funding being applied for and obtained for each project. Additionally, if a project can save costs in the long-term, the project's priority may be strengthened. For example, retrofitting street lighting to LED and/or pump energy efficiency retrofits could pay for thernselves in a matter of several years, and continue to say(-, costs in the long run. C3P [)ON'Ts, Frequently, engineers, public works directors and planners need to tell elected officials the bail news; that what they are allocating for funding isn't enough to accomplish their goals and that they need to look further. Maybe they cannot fund it in the short-term, but "plant the seed" to get them thinking about the longer term vision. It's a very important exercise, to define the community's needs and help administrators and elected officials determine which projects are most imperative, regardless Of Current funds available, t)0! waif mW1 u al ..... Ask as early as possible if you need a major project inserted into a CIP. Consider requesting this a year or two earlier than absolutely needed. Understand that a project may not get approved or funded initially, but it may begin to establish the groundwork for inclusion in future years. For example, if doing a full roadway reconstruction, make sure to include the related underground utility improvements. This sounds obvious, but it is often overlooked. ,),: N,, 0)i; � �, 1� ; - " I ]s. For example, think of all the rapid -growth communities that experienced 25% or more of their community built new in the Oil(] 2000s. It is great for rually communities to have new infrastructure, but determine if anyone has planned for the huge increase in resurfacing needs that will be necessary about 15 years after initial construction. City of Lake Elsirrom �on��ngu��np/nvk��mx��u<oo/o/�hu/x�y��cAsidehoo`cost, this isunoo(the mostdgniDcant points u(thoOPand plays omajor role inprinrihzin8projccu.Proje(:I/u$ifiCahonS!�odtutocuson public benefit and how the project ichieves goals that prevent hann, ensure salety or satisly a related comulUnitY objective. For example, pm -k plans inight emphasize the need to provide a safe play mea for chik-Iren or upgrade playground equipment that does not rueet safety standaids. Dox�/o�Je�/oconsk/��he8//pnzou�no�un�uvc,�Quhcps�e�/Providio�b/c|udinfonnahon about the consequences ofunfunded inop/ovcme^ts should bccooddcrcd.��ostio�portondy'makc sure. the UPties i/)the key components of th000moouoity'S St/o\c&ic|mnX-ter/om`dannua| bUdgeting ptocess, as this will help get "buy in" from thL top officials down to each depattinent head. TheC|Pcan also hcused asanopportunity for supporting the community's mission and vision, providing anoutlook well into the future. Finally, keep it) mind that it) many oasos,you are presenting the C|Pfor projcc\�and expenses that will extend well beyond the forms of the cut cool elected officiaK A sensible UPcanhelp y/eveoimaking comm itmetits and incurring debts that rn"yp/event the implementation of more important p,ojed`it) the fotvre,thereby strengthening the long termfinancial well 'being ofthe Community. City of Lake Elsinore 1111KI C I I I i I I �-F . ..... ... Limited staffing. City currently has a City Engineer vacancy and heavy workload assignments in Capital Projects. Existing staff does not have the time to complete Project responsibilities. Backlog of work including accounting for project tasks and acceptance of now project work. Lack of technical skills resulting in the inability to manage both short and long term project Issues. "I Additional workload ClUe to contractors' requests tot, information and documents. The City is seeking professional engineering and staffing expertise in all areas of the City's CIP, including City Engineer, Senior Engineer, and special project advisor functions. We are committed to initiating, facilitating, and maintaining open communication to see that each project is advanced from the design board to construction at the earliest opportunity. We believe this opportunity provides the City with independent analysis of engineering performed to date and proper management of resources. As an outside consultant, we are pro. pared to make immediate recommendations to deliver capital projects. Given the nature of this assignment, HR Green proposes to provide a "project strike team." Jim Smith, PF will provide overall weekly direction and expert guidance as a special projects advisor for the engagement. The professional engineers we are assigning to manage the day to day project delivery include Ke,n Rokavin;,, ri-,, 2.1SO and Slcne? Loriso, PE, QSD. WcArk Nav-i Raes ?nd Rf,.°sponsibifties Ken Ruf(avina, FE., (J'SO - Cit", Ken will fill the role as City Engineer to establish, direct, plan, surpervise, and organize the City Engineering assignments for Capital Projects and Land Development serving under the Public Works Director. Ken will analyze the project proposals and assist in delivering projects. Sir c I -'Ve Mlal Jer Steve will manage the delivery of the capital improvement program, including completing designs, project specifications, and budget Control. He will assist staff with advertising projects for construction bid, work with the finance department to establish proper Cost accounting of all project monies, and work to recover costs for services rendered. Ken will provide weekly updates to the Public Works Director. S. o h Jim will complete quality control of proposals, assist with recommendations to expedite project delivery, review final clocuments, and make recommendations to advance projects into construction. He. will assist the Public Works Director with day to day assignments to keep project ruornenturn. Jim will be available to help resolve decisions needed involving informal bidding, studies, orother technical support. City of Lake Elsinore I ti6J � I �llitlf'J- �J Our team will prepare staff reports for department heads, City council, and various committees/ commissions, as requested. This will include project progress reports and monthly/regulatly scheduled I eetings with the designated City representative. In addition, we will provide monthly invoicing wltfl detail in the format desired by the City. Following are sample pages from IT recent monthly progress repot we provided to the .lurt.lpa Valley City Council. mmlVil� trrgrnrerrrc7r.Tivuinrr r u4l ceu ,..e`ry is ill, .ne P:v "ill! r.Ll1IIIWt1mI n„J'-�: �raM hld LLl@)JOH,dIgnt. Inc fill h ld IN d.': mlpm tll. tlonpmr✓I Y i urnmil II :nanxl r' l'AI La<t S A hg&Vi lllc +Id IIll, <11 II)nmy to P.lIt llllllil, 1 ll fnr a(ryu. I u;roA apl le (or'pll II l (4„ ll,l,t I rr WO'. f .. „rrrl;r Itr IS.t.rll J.v"hper a;r r.'.I do v..a 1p Yrola wn ill+, I.It i 1 Ill I l,,,.nrz.,l,t_Ill,.AI Irl I '1+nIR' Prtrjel` j"d Ifi,s ❑+de ,ILP Wi1M1 Nt'fCc 1lWlx pll�a is thin(it, r nnp Ais. eirnrll the l: .y(u iu I? u... ... I q:x) CongNq,cA invaliailm, and uvlass of v;fnnd hhaz, ill 'lu@ inn_ill ....... ff - nv.rr I'i'Mr w:J infill Stoll 4umb. r -. � linyrnf rrJ Dvision r<.+, md: I I I tn rlcicd Jh:I,• IPr- J: I 1161 nill,"Ill I I I, I Iuu.v-I,,,.ial l I ...,,. errr�. ..-., , ."flied« "d Opdxed 11I Msfi IC sy.lu'nn Ott h^ nilly' I� I I'll, c.I .,,, ,a...r +I ,,,,II6 ), l l,( It l lnzl¢.n'ou A, iliac I'd ln,I p.eP=, 41rI I I II 9y IRfnt r, +r nL .,I-1 r . ...,:.I r..r,, 11 fill bepElprl•-rI1 1ia<..'if 11-1111It JUI .a�n .v ryA', tf y.=.rrr, annwn;i, 111111k, Il . n i Ill. ll(�SO [I'll ""i 'H., lit Ill ll:.1101 ( I . :I 14 il, I h,, "'toll 111.1, It, nu+[ftl ( ,.. le Vcrtx Il .. I I I J,en:rvn my nsrrvparh)_.t. smnmvvter Inlet Maintenance c ,yrt 11-. :d. It d:rlho, ll. 'di .ill o l-lw+Ill a 6 S «).h+a a,:rvt6rc p, 1 •Wrd'f IO ,..9vl HIll b( 1 'LL l „eld WIII,u eJlJn,v d",I ,b,S1¢F II, vJ—'a y elr W.iol' I db. I.u. ldeilc I�odio� p _,i ��rlrl In n,n <I''I ili:il -I d,(v I_,:GI, Tiol Orit, llY,cS;, ahGK oal l 10.1 �mltl i 1:+JI' 4.0 f + lTiL. .: ll Id, ill— M,, I"it, ICSCW la lilcit, Y, nA.oet slnl:Lti It,, A. ,Irr Ic csdll .,A mdL.y ,, r Lff•=. 'J.o LLca c:. n+. rnr. 1,I. I+ I t5 -I aft „d /n.rmc tr..h / I t N t¢- ]v-,V+RnadT illdA,Icv,� a ul ro ucf +l.V, I.L+'ti, J. mk-1 p:/lith i lo6rvs ;It, y-+ nunitIj G 11'I ,•l' ,4v I'll',t)::t-t..... -II: 1'�'ice. !J . Ic(r All 11 dic the lid aIli Pfcaol CAt 't ',f l,. T,,. 1, 1 IIIIt Ir. I, fl.rnl r, q. . ,l l .ImAn:.l ,i, iI t:af Gq•hud' vim .,.5;M ,d-:., _ludo vAiik i,, 11 .... A .. cr Ids 6n ),d p,,dh blamli, ill410. a.,ITII "All A.t"Ill Il t Il..oI, A lie. G'+vA hl .. n_ . l c_t 1 u .I ..I 11.,un.aemr ...11rl it, i((!at„n„+IldttC�CA..S()aryIll ll'V to i\. h'1 i JIIYI?."il 1;111 1 r I M1. 1IE I- Y. ..n[,I,, d .t.( I", ld rn UUPlrb t. f It 1.1 +fdvoa. Il It rpN •^'.,< a d"ls.Ltl`c silt fi_o ctl y61 •. `, ..+1 t e. .ind Flup�io I. I me l sd. G I 11cJ I t i, I i TSI 1l'lll°.L y"u t ai.dRZ v 1'f.'>w tl I,diluA .I ( a i Isgl 1 I li 111. , I v,rO H(TD I - ilup. ,Lieu t I- .ra Gaod 1. ,wr AT' ,u san,l: 'f66nnr�ir i .cA bldx I TI -:oNm I vub^rf I v.rtlu .lu d v,er G.i'o 11. lrndme+I ll l I Ln url I i .. 12 City of Lake Elsinore Slid( I , I . 11 i I , , , , , I I . t " 1-myinet" illy Dit'i"i... 1,,W I M - 2i 21 13 City of Lake Elsinore Pt l 13 : ia?I "d Will it itj :?t ! j I t,. I i,pi tI Iartil, 1, Pt o Ill"ll 1,111—l" — , " 1, al I., I I , , , a .:,`III I ;,I," I I III a -i A — , I .✓I ,:, I I , I It, ", , " I -v S, , I 'it .% , I I , , , I II "I it I, i,i l F, !I t, t i z P, NO., I l I .,I ,.it I .. .. ... a ,n ail 'a d 11 . Ill k 11; 1: ......... . . .... .... t, It'i "Iftell" I "I'J" 1 1 't J I' 'l'k-t 1; "A "lla, j ll -I 1[, .wl l, 1 1, 1, M,, I I ,-n. It J ',l1 M1. I l I A, l., I W Ill "Ill, "'l I " . ....... . I- A, 0 It I(1-..1 I f IIIII I' "1 11 L I Il Ill Il a'aIIII ll Il.ti L, tr�l "s, f It 1". 11 Il a; 1A '11j, t la �, ! I AI Ill., Mll It, I, I, I Ivu ,11 '61, il , 1, td Y l l, ", , 11 j 'It" 1, 1, 1( q to " I, . " All, .'dc, dIil It, I I'lit, I— tolt, "'t ,f 1 aa I I -'"I,' III 1 1, 1 111 . . . t' .'t . ..... 1 ".1 it- ­ l "I" i4'It , t 'i""I I I I, I I,I I . . . . . f Mill at'll A,vu.IIL„11; 6 1 1 l �z, t ...... .. .... al 11 It 1 .111 l I I"al f,— " it, ,, i, A, 11 , I I ......... .. . �t Ij lo,lh,l), I— lit, tttlltl 'i loIll C Ifit. I.' F1111li I 11, I'll All "t, ,,, , l -lt.ltll I , $ ar'll 2 "iAlt"t, "', '. It IN V if I s I Lom It all' l, I t ” - af—, l 'II a"l I I"I" it 11 . . It l. ""j" I 111 J arr>E't*j a.I "J", uva l[ I ,,, I t I i 1.1 " 0 It"i It i I` "r I-, , 1 11 I., ,, I - it A u, t- I 'itt", Ir Ill Il", d In "l , I ali t I. J 4,-:?', 11 of 11 .1 11 I"it, " .,.lI m, — 11, hl.d" "ll I,, I —I I, I al 11,1 AI. [ I , il A2 , i IYA 'j,"; I d "') I � ffJrll,, 1, 2''i,*ovrlrg A11A y,Il alb 1, d1b"t I 1I.I.1 I I ll ,,.el t "ItaIl" "I "Ill I'a I I ),I ,I'I"ald"i I ale fii,." at 1, .1 " (l .%I Ill, I I A .nll lI:..davAolot,I 1 , I I tv,m :ed Lol I, f 'j, l , I. All, . " I " I , J po ;) Iota I ll it. "" re %!A, " A" r"'I "Ifill ,,, "Al"ll apill r"Iteli— ,,, ,�, Wat I . . I . . 1 1. 1 l� '1.,; :1 ", I. f,w, I, "d" I IIsiI'l. it I t al It II, "i", 1, all, 'a, 11 1 Iti N"I'lifill, I ovoP1lyra lcd1 111 j I,i, tif a to "It"', lloi " fz-ml I I II II,itla Il 0 1 rr. I:Illt It., Ilkli 111 3 td.a." fail yea.... I),1 1l I. 11'1ali Ia, !'t J ".), 1 111 "1 "10 14 'it —, it I t" t I ol I II .IlI,Il II-Acn>M1 1 1 "_ I,.rad f ..,Irtirl.., i6r.A nOtir. nl 111 11 1 I.l", 1 1. 1, 1 �1), I'll, III - I t 1 11 � 't, I - - - tt", I It 1 1, 1,101 111,111!ti 11k. I, a tl ll`t". a rI )li It I t I I I I a, I It t I r Iv It I I l <t111 7 1 11 1 1 , I I l I I I VI It I I l I A I I Ill"ll 1,111—l" — , " 1, al I., I I , , , a .:,`III I ;,I," I I III a -i A — , I .✓I ,:, I I , I It, ", , " I -v S, , I 'it .% , I I , , , I II "I it I, i,i l F, !I t, t i z P, NO., I l I .,I ,.it I .. .. ... a ,n ail 'a d 11 . Ill k 11; 1: ......... . . .... .... t, It'i "Iftell" I "I'J" 1 1 't J I' 'l'k-t 1; "A "lla, j ll -I 1[, .wl l, 1 1, 1, M,, I I ,-n. It J ',l1 M1. I l I A, l., I W Ill "Ill, "'l I " . ....... . I- A, 0 It I(1-..1 I f IIIII I' "1 11 L I Il Ill Il a'aIIII ll Il.ti L, tr�l "s, f It 1". 11 Il a; 1A '11j, t la �, ! I AI Ill., Mll It, I, I, I Ivu ,11 '61, il , 1, td Y l l, ", , 11 j 'It" 1, 1, 1( q to " I, . " All, .'dc, dIil It, I I'lit, I— tolt, "'t ,f 1 aa I I -'"I,' III 1 1, 1 111 . . . t' .'t . ..... 1 ".1 it- ­ l "I" i4'It , t 'i""I I I I, I I,I I . . . . . f Mill at'll A,vu.IIL„11; 6 1 1 l �z, t ...... .. .... al 11 It 1 .111 l I I"al f,— " it, ,, i, A, 11 , I I ......... .. . �t Ij lo,lh,l), I— lit, tttlltl 'i loIll C Ifit. I.' F1111li I 11, I'll All "t, ,,, , l -lt.ltll I , $ ar'll 2 "iAlt"t, "', '. It IN V if I s I Lom It all' l, I t ” - af—, l 'II a"l I I"I" it 11 . . It l. ""j" I 111 J arr>E't*j a.I "J", uva l[ I ,,, I t I i 1.1 " 0 It"i It i I` "r I-, , 1 11 I., ,, I - it A u, t- I 'itt", Ir Ill Il", d In "l , I ali t I. J 4,-:?', 11 of 11 .1 11 I"it, " .,.lI m, — 11, hl.d" "ll I,, I —I I, I al 11,1 AI. [ I , il A2 , i IYA 'j,"; I d "') I � ffJrll,, 1, 2''i,*ovrlrg A11A y,Il alb 1, d1b"t I 1I.I.1 I I ll ,,.el t "ItaIl" "I "Ill I'a I I ),I ,I'I"ald"i I ale fii,." at 1, .1 " (l .%I Ill, I I A .nll lI:..davAolot,I 1 , I I tv,m :ed Lol I, f 'j, l , I. All, . " I " I , J po ;) Iota I ll it. "" re %!A, " A" r"'I "Ifill ,,, "Al"ll apill r"Iteli— ,,, ,�, Wat I . . I . . 1 1. 1 l� '1.,; :1 ", I. f,w, I, "d" I IIsiI'l. it I t al It II, "i", 1, all, 'a, 11 1 Iti N"I'lifill, I ovoP1lyra lcd1 111 j I,i, tif a to "It"', lloi " fz-ml I I II II,itla Il 0 1 rr. I:Illt It., Ilkli 111 3 td.a." fail yea.... I),1 1l I. 11'1ali Ia, !'t J ".), 1 111 "1 "10 14 'it —, it I t" t I ol I II .IlI,Il II-Acn>M1 1 1 "_ I,.rad f ..,Irtirl.., i6r.A nOtir. nl 111 11 1 I.l", 1 1. 1, 1 City ofLake Elsinore I nf�l_� I SIlii�l:l tit:.; City Engineer t. i ,n ,:),' c ..),i(., iicmJ C.?. Bachelor'of Science, Civil Engineering Bachelor of Science, Meteorology Registered Civil Engineer, CA 1342866 California Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) 4101047 30+ Years Municipal Engineering Management Overseen Design and Construction of $400 Million in Public improvements City Engineer, 6 Southern California Cities Supervising Engineer, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Ken brings unique perspective, vision, and value to both large and small-scale municipal projects. Due to his many years of city engineering experience, he understands the issues local public officials face on a daily basis along with the insight to see all sides of complex coordination challenges with utility companies, neighboring cities, transportation agencies, Caltrans, railroads, property owners and others. Ken's project experience spans the gamut of the following types of projects: - Street Reconstruction Street Widening Intersection Capacity Enhancement Overlay and Slurry Seal Landscape Improvements Medians - Storm Drains Entrance Signs Right -of -Way Acquisitions Water Quality BMPs Storm Drain & Sewer Master Plans Park Improvements Sewers and Waterlines Traffic Signals City Engineering, City of Rosemead, CA. Deputy City Engineer and City Engineer/ Director of Public Works for 17 years responsible for running the day to day operations and decision making of the City's engineering and public works department as well as implementing an ammo1 capital improvement program, ranging between $5 million and $10 million. Primary tasks included project planning/management; public relations for City's public works projects; preparation of Council staff reports, resolutions, ordinances and report writing; liaison with traffic engineer and traffic commission; capital improvement program budgets preparation; oversight of preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates; construction observation/administration; oversight and management the City's maintenance contracts (road, traffic signals, signing and striping); funding application preparation, processing, and invoicing; development review and subdivision (tentative and final map) processing; plan checking; and water quality management. City Engineering, Cities of Lakewood, Rolling Hills Estates, Bellflower, Temple City, and Lawndale, CA. City Engineer responsible for running the day to day operations and decision making of the City's engineering and public works department as well as implementing an annual CIP program. Engineering and Plan Review, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, CA. Supervising Engineer responsible for directing the activities of drainage and grading plan checkers in the Land Development Division. In Road Maintenance District 1, supervised engineering personnel responsible for the development of plans and specifications for various County street projects. Performed contract administration for the County's flood control facilities while assigned to the Construction Division, and prepared hydrology and drainage studies during his tenure in the Hydraulics Division. City of Lake Elsinore i " Fed(,ral/State Funding Adrninistration, Various Agencies, Southern California. Provided oversight: and assistance to numerous cities at various stages of the federal/state-funded process as follows: Call for Projects applications, FTIP Programming, Field Review, Preliminary Environnnentai Study (PES), Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction, Award Submittal, Labor Compliance, Progress Invoicing, and Final Report of Expenditures. The various federal and state funding programs have included STP, SR2S, ARRA, 11131) (ILBRR), and HSIP (HES). La Pata Avenue Gap Closure and Camino Del Rio Extension, County of Orange, CA, Project Manager for the preparation of PS&E and right-of-way documents. This 3.7 mile, $72 million roadway project bisects the Prima Deshecha Landfill and will eliminate an existing gap in the Orange County arterial highway system, with a connection between Ortega Highway and the City of San Clemente. The project includes the widening and rehabilitation of the existing roadway and new roadway through mountainous terrain, construction of landscaped medians, multiple waterquality basins, nearly 10 million yards of earth moving, four grade separations, relocation of SDG&E transmission towers, and environmental mitigation measures. Palos Verdes Drive West - Soldier Pile Wall, City of Palos Verdes Estates, CA. Project Manager for the repair of Palos Verdes Drive West and design of a 300 foot soldier pile caisson wall to protect the road from an active landslide. Provided oversight for research and review of existing utilities, preparing the site plan, civil plans, cost estimate, and specifications. Construction Manager overseeing construction observation and administration services, as well as managing the geotechnical subconsultant who provided specialty inspection and test services. Monitored preparation of daily logs of construction activities, met with the contractor to resolve issues, worked closely with City staff to help keep t:he project on schedule, and supported the Caltrans audit performed for the expenditure of ARRA funds. Garvey Avenue Bridge, City of Rosemead, CA. As City Engineer, responsible for replacing the Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio I -tondo Channel, which involved extensive coordination with federal, state, and local agencies. The new $11 million bridge is 420 feet long and 100 feet wide, with only three piers in the channel. As the City desired a signature bridge to serve as a gateway to the community, historic features of the old bridge were recreated and decorative lighting and monuments were incorporated into the design. The bridge serves as an entrance statement into the City. Worked closely with Caltrans to obtain federal funding and environmental clearance, and with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works in obtain approval of the hydraulic analysis and civil/structural plans as a prerequisite for obtaining the necessary encroachrnent permits from each agency. Provided oversight of the construction management team. Engineering services for the Rosedale Master Planned Community Project, City of Azusa, CA. Principal -in -Charge and provided a range of city engineering services specific to the Rosedale project, a master planned community of 1,200 new homes to be developed on the former Monrovia Nursery site. Oriented around an active village core and recreation center, Rosedale included a series of neighborhoods with parks, a new K-8 school, fire station, Metrolink Gold Line Station, and 200 acres of permanently preserved natural hillsides. Engineering services provided included subdivision map checking, public improvement plan review, coordination of consultant activities, other agencies and utility services, preparation of slaff reports, and attendance at City Council and Commission meetings. 0 City of Lake Elsinoret 1 y Project Manager 'r -ii n'1 t, ,r it ;tit , / .. ""!!;o Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Registered Civil Engineer, CA 1464701 Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), CA# 00503 17+Years Municipal Engineering and Construction Management Project/Construction Management of Diverse Inhastructure Projects Steve has nearly 20 years of design, CIP program management, design management, plan review, NPDES/water quality compliance, and const:niction management experience of municipal public improvement projects, including roads, drainage, water, sewer, traffic, grading, and parking lots. Ile has served 20+ cities, including Pomona, Corona, Norco, Monrovia, Walnut, San Gabriel, Claremont, Chino, and Indio. Steve has managed the implementation of the Munidpal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit for various municipalities; performed review of compliance documents for private and public developments, and acted as the owner's representative. Municipal Engineering, City of Walnut, CA. Deputy City Engineer responsible for preparing City's Capital Improvement budget, overseeing the design and construction of all capital projects, plan checking of land development projects, and assessment engineering. Program Management, City of Pomona, CA. Contract Program Manager for City's Utility Services Department: responsible for the design and construction of various sewer and water projects. Handled project analysis, RFP preparation/evaluation, project coordination, and City Council award and advertisement of bid packages. South Campus Drive Improvement, City of Pomona, CA, Project Manager for $2.5 million street reconstruction project (Temple Avenue to Ridgeway Street). The existing roadway pavement, consisting of nearly 10 acres of asphalt surface, was originally designed for low traffic volumes, but had deteriorated due to the expanding adjacent California State University, Pomona which generated high traffic volumes. Project was rehabilitated using a Full Depth Reclamation pavement strategy. Recycled Water Pipeline, Inland Empire Utilities Agency/City of Chino, CA. Project Manager for "jack and bore" design of 250 L.F. of :30 inch diameter ductile it pipe under heavily travelled Euclid Avenue. Valley Boulevard Street Rehabilitation, City of Walnut, CA, Project Manager for design, construction management, contract administration, and labor compliance of one mile of road reconstruction and widening, including removal and replacement of existing asphalt concrete pavernent, construction of center median, curb, gutter, sidewalk, bus turnouts, and traffic signal improvements. Project required extensive coordination between the Cities of Walnut and Industry, and the County of Los Angeles. Public Works Maintenance Facility, City of San Gabriel, CA. Program Manager for development and construction of a new $7.1 million Public Works Maintenance Facility to accommodate the Police Department's expansion. The project was separated into two phases of construction - rough grading of an existing trash transfer facility and the final facility construction. Varner Road Street Improvements, City of Indio, CA. Project Manager for street improvement: and widening involving the design and construction mariagernent of one mile of frontage road parallel to Interstate 10 as well as drainage, signing and striping, and right-ol-way acquisition. 17 city of Lake Elsinore c, :� �_, { .�,,,, �, <= r � .�,�! i.. c, , net v.s , �:; , >�r r, :,� z �.a,'r �. •- a Special Projects. Advisor tL �r. roe ,,•` ,. � i,r'i Masters, Business Administration Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Revistered Civil Engineer, CA 4142977 29 Years Municipal Management and Project Management Experience Extensive On -Site Staff Augmentation Experience Public Works Director/City Engineer, SO Southern California Cities For nearly 30 years Jim has served as Public Works Director/City Engineer for nearly 10 Southern California cities. He has established design and construction standards for capitaI projects, reducing overall public construction costs 2ft analyzed and implemented municipal information management systerns; guided the preparation of grant applications for capital projects, realizing subsequent revenues Ili excess of $3 million peryear from external sources; administered multi-year Capital Improvement Programs, completing municipal improvements for large projects totaling in excess of $800 million; planned and organized special ballot elections, generating annual revenues for parks, landscaping, police services, street lighting, and other Infrastructure; and negotiated engineering and real property contracts for agencies. Jim is recognized for his "big -picture" approach to maximize alternative financing (e.g., bonds, grants, development impact fees, special districts, etc.) that fund capital projects to enhance the quality of life, public safety, rnobility, and recreation. He conceptualizes projects that can be leveraged beyond filling basic operations and maintenance needs to generate greater value to constituents. Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Jurupa Valley, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration; the overview and approval for transportation, land development, and maintenance activities, interfacing with state, federal, and County agencies for project approvals, entitlements, and cooperative agreements; and special district formation and administration (e.g., CFDs, LLMDs, etc.). Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Placentia, CA, City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination, Oversaw $6.5 million in street rehabilitation improvements citywide through gas tax funding. Public Works Director, City of San Bernardino, CA. Interim Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration and multi -agency and stakeholder coordiination. A primaryfocus was to identify cost-saving opportunities. Saved $2 million/year by cliverting t:he hauling of waste t:o regional landfills. This was accomplished by establishing agreernents with waste management companies to hard waste to local material re -use facilities. Money was saved by shorter haul grips, recycling of some material, and avoidance of landfill fees. <JIS r,p w City ofLake Elsinore I tlhl � 1411�1t�I�L >, City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Indio, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder, coordination. Was at City for five years during period of $3 billion economic growth and doubling of population. Coordinated preparation of $500 million Development Impact Fee, over construction of community buildings (e.g., city hall, teen center, community center). Increased water tank storage from 6 to 70 million gallons. Oversaw citywide street rehabilitation and improvements to Highway 111, involving drainage facilities, roadway widening, and congestion relief elements. Secured $10 million in grant funding through RCI C, ISI FA, and CVAG sources/programs. Also, oversaw the design and construction of the 1-10/Jefferson Street- Interchange. City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Yorba Linda, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, land development, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Oversaw construction of $25 million Black Gold Golf Club and adjacent 2,100 unit development. Golf course generates $2 million annually in net income to General Fund. Also, secured $27 million in regional funding sources to construct four -mile long Imperial Highway project. City Engineer, City of Garden Grove, CA. City Engineer responsible for CIP project administration, land development, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Expansion of Disney facilities brought extensive development street improvements to area, including construction of 10,000 hotel rooms and Harbor Boulevard Corridor and Beautification Enhancement. Secured $10 million to fund these streetscape enhancements. Sat on Orange County Flood Control Advisory Committee and obtained $8 million in grant funding to widen and improve the Bolsa Chica Channel, thereby eliminating flooding in the immediate area. Sat on the State Route 22 Advisory Committee tasked with recommendations to widen the freeway, interchange improvements, and addition of auxiliary lanes. Was instrumental in shepherding these improvements while avoiding the elimination of revenue producing properties, such as the Auto Mall, adjacent to SR 22, Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Norwalk, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Focused on coordinating City's interests associated with the 1-5 widening and proposed high-speed train to Anaheim. Attended Caltrans and MTA meetings to coordinates -5 widening project approvals. Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Calimesa, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, land development, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Coordinated permitting and approvals for large development projects north of 1-10 homes and associated infrastructure tied to City facilities, Municipal Management / Engineering, City of Moreno Valley, CA, Deputy City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director/Capital Projects Manager responsible for managing all facets of $95 million, 5 -year CIP program. Formed and administered special districts. Hired and managed various consultants to successfully deliver the CIP piogranr. Land Development, Southern California. Managed design and construction of master planned communities for Landmark, it large developer of mixed-use, master planned communities and golf rcnrrse, such as Moreno Valley Ranch, PGA West, and Oak Valley. M 4 1 tri City of Lake Elsinore The following proposed fee schedule reflects proposed staffing hours payable on an hourly basis which will be billed monthly to the City up to but. not exceeding $30,000. Personnel Classification Hnurly Rate City Engineer $165 Project Manager $9.60 Special Projects Advisor, $ 7.7o Subject to written direction by the City Manager, IM Green also proposes to Conduct project construction management and inspection services for projects assigned at a fee of 10 percent of the total construction project cost. This action is subject to approval of the City of Lake Elsinore Mayor and City Council xr CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE U.. DATE RAINna1YYYY) 05/22/201.5 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CER fIFIGATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT A1=FIRMAI'IVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXETND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE. OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, IMPORTANT: If tho certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed, If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain poUcles may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not Confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). .-._-__-_..._.,�._....�..--..._— PRODUCER1-000-300-0325 CONTACT NAME Mxchoa.le Groin Holmes Murphy & Assoc - CR _ PROBE 319-09G /91v _ _--rAX &GG 231 1022- _ 66 500 let Avenue INS, Suite 300 OAIIDgrai B($i1011YPaml1L[i]y O A11BFS - - -- - --- INSURER�LAFFOROING GOVCMGE MAIC q _ Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 INSQItLRf Z{rich American InGUrann Company 1G535 I— INSURED INSURERS: TLave1.C.YG PYU[lexly Casualty Company Of. 25614 RR Green Inc INSURERC: XL Specialty insurance Company!37885 0710 ERYhart Lane EW INSURLRO P.O. Box 9009 INSURER E Cedar Rapids, TA 52409-9009 INSURER COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 44000000 REVISION NUMBER: 'PHIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN IS SUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION Of ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECI TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECI" TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIM] IS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSI� "-�'- - TIMID S"IIORi-" POLICY Erb POLICY EkP ' LTR A TYILpFINSURANCF diff X COMMERCIALGENENA IIARILIIY Myu._ POLICY NUMREii amain 'YY1�J' __ . C-10393096905 01/01/75 IMMIDOIYVYYiI 0If01/16 LIMITS EACH oCCURRFNYx S 1,000 000 1 _.. ,- J(,LAWS MADE X I OCCUR _15NWAGTTORED TED PREMISS S Vaq ) ._. $ 300,000 I,MEUEXP (Aay One porcm0 5 10,000 _J _ I AGCRFCATC LIMIT' APjPLIE,PfR DS(1NN.&ADVINJGCNI NTC rELRALAGGREGA $2,000000 1 OUCY X jJECfCX I LOC UDUCid COMP/OP ACG $ 2,000 000 OTHER,�� _01/01/16 j-aP3Y3096805 � SINGLE LIMIT A AUTOMOBIINLE LIABILITY 01/O3/15 ;cOMaIrvEn .52,000,000 X ANYAUTO I NODILYINJURY(P PrIxi) � $ ...._.. —j ALI.OWNro SCHEDULED ,y AUTOS _ AHTOS IX �' NON ONMEO HIRED AD MIS '�, AUTOS '� .. BODILY INJURY (Per a deo))$_ 444 , PROPERTY DAMAGE I (ProeCGQpPI) .—. - $ 1 Y1 . B X UMBRELLA LIAR OGCOR 56615 101/01/15 101/01/16 LACHOCCURRENCF 515,000,000 LXJ EXCESS LIAR I CLAIMS IMnrACGREGALC X RLIENTI(1N$ 10, 000 �O1/O1/15 _ $ 13,000,000 $ A 'WORKERS _yDrl)� COMPENSATION 'WC39309GG05 '01/01/16 X STATVT[_ �YI AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITYYIN I '- '---- r i Irl EACH ACCIDENT 1 $ 1,000 000 IAPIYPROIRIEIONPARTNEfLLXEGIII'RVI: O:-PICEWMCNIBER EXCLUDED? I•=__IINIAi (M.dnt.r, In NII) 1 EL DISEASE EA Mi LOYES$ � "'- ---- 3.1000 000 If as ansmoa antler ' DESCRIPY'ION OF OPf-.I3A1'IONS UeIow �DPR9918'/9G _ E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT i$ 1,000, OOD C' Profesai.onal Liability ) O1/Ol/15 O1 01/16 'Par Claim 5,000,000 I(Cl.aimn Made Covarage) Aggregate 61000,000 DESCRIPTION Of OPERATIONS /LOCATIONS /VEHICLES IADDRD Wt, A<Wlllonnl Remarks Scimtlula, may ho n1lncM1oJ ifinoro space I5 raquiretl) The City, its elected or appointed officers, o£fi.ci.als, empleyecs, agents Rod volunteers are i.ncictled as Additional Insureds on the General Liability and Auto Liability on a primary and non-contributory basin as requiredby written coThract with the insured, per Policy terms and conditions. The General Liability and Auto Liability includes a Waiver of Subregati.n in favor of the additional insureds as required by written contract. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Lake Elainore THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS, Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street AUT HORIZCO REPRESENTATIVE Elninora, CA 92530 USA I V1lltltl-2014AGVKDGUKFUKAIIUN. All ng lits reserveO. ACORD 25 (2014101) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ktrrewsercr 440011800 to v Q' L •C @ u L $ } ° Y O a t r E p• V m Q O N 'C i L @ @E v m O ti c u p @ c 3 E ii5`i5i. O C 000 N H O $ a _ C 4ityts > O .j p 3 ^ +° dy ' u m N m vi v SOD wl O c "6 C 0 •6 0 Of ,n 3 U O C O m L 'O u N "y n0 to W N N O 0 v, d - m C O Nu O u L O J to Y Z G 'O +�+ C �^ O O U .o C cc lip OY CL i 7 0 Li L y E U O @ 7 Y> C J m O m . v, '� C y U u E a+ c CL 'c a Lr m m E* c m y E i Y ,.. N OC am+ W N umi .p IA N "p Q Q tw Y O C E CO OB O E N C O C O C 0 m Q VA O � C � 4� Q N yti v •D O U ` C C)° CL m 3 f° L 5 o vi O v v a s = �° N W O O LL to U p •6 C p N N U vai O N vi 20 O L N C' i y N O C LO t0 e -i C O O1 to N O O' _a O U C c W m U Y 'O N 4 "m0 c x ix x y "i R, to e ,i K c d u1 rl \ Q N e � m � c m E v n .a O ro .� v � 4j .3 Co 0 o a v v oo. y o � 3 o °D u c � > c m r o x w a c N E 0 ONv a 2 N 3 C a 0 m m U n K N LL n "O N 'n 'c r cF h 'a w 'c n CL `� o m ' s ami o m m c N m o ao y m m c o o E "- O V m (L x x x mm c C N G L m J J J U LL O O U O .� E .0 3 - w x o o ni m r W C N w Ln - u1 inm in in h tti Z iYi1 N O m Z u h N tP 4- d' M t0 N N G ny c U U \ a o o `a o m = •r, '..� n ui a N to ti o an O >N H rl V m m 'CS 6 dJ n O Y ` •O •O d d N 'O m V n n u t0 N y v U U U uj m O. w u > > u U U > d 11 U cy u m a Q o 5 a a u u ma c °• n c =o c v m c n n c c av c E •c c m m ui o- m v J fy a 'i fO c c nv c c c an .a m Oe U �.. U m d c U v m v a u u an a a to a n n ti m n n n N � *' C �' � �"' 'a' '"• N � v°'i N N C N ON v'''i C N 'a o •N � C7 C M N C.0 O C m m O z 2 C C Q y nlN J C nl C a _m LL r N a O C y m 4 m an m C N = T a 0 .N m h O d v to Y i N v m 'n 7 NC N N O= O "c d z m m ro u F U= m n 3 o (aj a LL C) O Q L a= u @J 4 z Y N C7 ro u u u u u o2 u o u rc u u a — 0 0 0 0 LM oj U o ,� w o4 `w m R 'C N E VO' d N O 5 M W 0) .m° Ln ;t2O N N D. C w 0 E 00 C 1 � � � n C U a H AO UO m Cn00 t~0 � s 0 0 hp v "�'` m � V N i O � � •� •� N vi U1 i Y LL v U) N A d N u1 N i C m `� ° N O m .L] H V1 m u U m O j{V M 00 O h O O m to m to C d D N 00 ON N V' N co V N ItOO ti N N (D N U by C a M c '� 0 U N lf1 c C u � CL 3 Lri _ W v m w a c •a C yyj 'O 'O O j j I.!) j C V '^ N a U O. C by M bM CL R O C C G m m m T O aj 3 Ln n. CO -o O O O a U N C C1 C 0) C Q) 'V {n a 2 N Qj LL. N CL Y N m •� V1 raLL �./ 'D Ln W ° 6. N C N T ,4 O O t A I O N N m G o a o v m o, N O � O .Y i Oy v0 Oa. a' m jp m u N •.. � m U a vi — G •Q .a+ �n a "- o ri am C = m O G N Q U �N •�+ Y � t�ii �� L N •� � •? '� G .. aO v c' a Y � W C m N U m ? O t9 c G ry m a L J a V� w a O. r ca U `p_ O L G G m Y N m -O a a Lj p• o m o a f0 ¢ vi o a 'o rl m b G = V m a v N ;Q M V u C Uj N U Q V ui C Q. O N O. m N CL O N \ 0 N ' oz 3 'Cp -p r, W U O • H e N b u a v V co tO n. bGq ..... wlU tL rp p o .` CL O ui C Q N X11 C � 2 V d a V C V N cui i m C N N N a F F G v c a u Qa m a c c c v � ^ o 66 c CL a nu G bD C c G v v a U U G T C v r9 N m Q m o CL VI n {n T U a U x Wo a� w 0 U V > l7 d J D Q U p� OS� a°i O°1 m v E () Q N o° O �. J N O O C t - N >, o o�,- O ` N N U _ w a App f6 A LL �i S O= 5 N r�A U 41 m �� 1T c M E L 'm O ftlw CO m o N U Q N O 0 E° o A -p m w O c NLo NN�mmE m N wL.ow N> a _ m tit O it 'fp N n .`L I(4 - I. q n; E UJ 4p 4,9 09 )s � r r t.� si } ® < E1' a �`�`�, �^%w1 'v 'l hi ' .., � � C40 h s? City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w Jake-elsinore.org I ski: � Sy;stlJ' m Text File File Number: ID# 14-648 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 9) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6/18/2015 CITY OF ,;, LADE LSIIYOKE DREAM E)C'T uME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to approve the third year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Sustainable Civil Engineering Services, Inc. (SCES), for project management and plan check services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background On June 27, 2013, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in an amount not to exceed $300,000 with SCES for engineering plan check services. The term of the PSA is for a period of three (3) years, subject to annual review by the City Council. On May 27, 2014, the PSA was amended to allocate an additional $260,000 for project management services, for a total contract amount of $560,000. Discussion Ms. Eskandari, Principal of SCES, provides project management and coordinating services on several key projects such as: Railroad Canyon/1-15 Interchange; Railroad Canyon/1-15 Southbound Deceleration Lane; Main Street/1-15 Interchange; and the Central Avenue (SR74)/1-15 widening projects. These projects require extensive project management and coordination with CALTRANS and Riverside County Transportation agencies. The PSA with SCES establishes a rate not to exceed 75% of the plan check and inspection amount collected for each project; revisions to approved plans are billed at 80% of the fee collected by the City. For those applicants that want their project "fast tracked," the project will be billed up to 1.5 times the normal rate. Amendment No. 3 Professional Services Agreement — SCES June 23, 2015 Page 2 The Engineering Department has been very satisfied with the services provided by SCES and recommends the City Council approve the third year of the PSA. New requests for proposals will be considered for FY 2016-2017. No additional monies are awarded at this time. Fiscal Impact Plan check services are paid by fees collected by developers through the City's cost recovery system. Project management costs are budgeted into projects included in the adopted Capital Improvement Plan budget. To date, $376,798.23 has been expended for this contract. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Attachment A — Amendment No. 3 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Services PSA ATTACHMENT A AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. Engineering Plan Check and Project Management Services This Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Professional Services ("Amendment No. 3") is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City), and Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Inc., ("Consultant'). RECITALS A. The City and Consultant have entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Services dated as of June 27, 2013 (the "Original Agreement'). Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Original Agreement. B. The Original Agreement provided for compensation to Consultant in an amount of Three Hundred Thousand dollars ($300,000) for a period of three (3) years, subject to annual review by the City Council. C. Amendment No. 2 to the Original Agreement provided for compensation to Consultant in an amount of Two Hundred Sixty Thousand dollars ($260,000), for a total contract amount of Five Hundred Sixty Thousand dollars ($560,000). No 3. The parties now desire to renew the Original Agreement, as set forth in this Amendment NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Section 2, Time of Performance, of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to add the following: The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue for a period of three (3) years, ending on June 30, 2016, subject to annual review by the City Council. The City may, at its sole discretion, extend the term of this Agreement on a 12 -month basis not to exceed two (2) additional twelve (12) month renewal terms by giving written notice thereof to Consultant not less than thirty (30) days before the end of the contract term, such notice to be exercised by the City Manager. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. ATTACHMENT A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. X to be executed on the respective dates set forth below. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager Date: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A-1 —Amendment No.2 Exhibit B — Original Agreement "CONSULTANT" Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. Ati Eskandari, P.E., Principal Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. Date: ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT A-1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT A-1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATING SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 27, 2014 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore ("City) a municipal corporation, and Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions ("Consultant'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On June 27, 2013 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Lake Elsinore for Professional Services", in the amount of $300,000. b. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of $260,000 to $560,000 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 3. Compensation of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed a total of $260,000 (Two Hundred and Sixty Thousand Dollars and no cents) for the Second Amendment and bringing the total agreement amount of $560,000 (Five Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars and no Cents). City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above, which date shall be considered by the Parties to be the effective date of this Agreement. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ..� Natasha Johnson - ay r Date: Bloom, City Clerk Date: Approved as to Form: Barb a Z. Leibol , C' y Attorney Date: (LL `)' CONSULTANT, Ati Eskandari, P.E. QSD Principal Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. Date:r�— ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT B ORIGINAL 2013 AGREEMENT [ATTACHED] MR90 7m-5 EXHIBIT B AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement")is made and entered into as of the Z2_ day of u yu , 2013, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc ("Consultant"), RECITALS A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional Engineering Department Plan Check Services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue for a period of three (3) years, subject to annual review by the City Council. 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. And in no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $300,000.00 without additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City. 5, Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City requests that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City. Extra work will be invoiced separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of Services PrOfC5SH' d Scrvicefi Agreement 1 08/26/10 EXHIBIT B 6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 08126/10 Pro(esvimml Sevices Agreement 2 EXHIBIT B B. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant. Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and Professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and p . possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) hores.simal Services Agiecme°I 3 09/26/10 EXHIBIT B 11, Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with taws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. 15. Insurance Requirements. a.Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. i, Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. ii. General Liabilityoverage C. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 4 08J26/10 Pmlcssinnal scrvica Agrccmwl EXHIBIT B iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. Professional Services Agreement 5 08/26/10 EXHIBIT B d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Ken Seurnalo 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: Ati Eskandari SCES 1875 California Ave Corona, CA 92881 7. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit D. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit D without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Yrolessionnl Services Agrecmept 6 08/26/10 EXHIBIT C 22, Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall the rusts of mediation equally. It the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising there from. 27. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. Professional Services Agreement 7 08/26/I0 EXHIBIT B IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE: J Grant ates, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ra Z Lieb610, City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Scope of Services Exhibit B - Fee Schedule CONSULTANT: Tit e: tic% Business License ATTiEST: Virginia loom, Ci Clerk PmJess ianal Services Agrecnicnt 8 OW 6/10 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES ProlScrvAgnttap x.000 EXHIBIT"A" -- Page I 09AW99 111. SCOPE OF WORK Scope of work is to provide As Needed, On -Call Plan Checking Engineering Services to the City Public Works Department, Engineering Division in accordance with all provisions within this RFP. These services will be on an intermittent basis. The scope of work includes engineering review and check for correctness of plans, design calculations and technical specifications related to materials for proposed improvements, development of correction lists, transmittal of correction lists to the Applicant and status updates to the City. Key resource will be latest edition of City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Design Guidelines Manual and Standard Drawings for the preparation and checking of Improvement plans, Drainage, and Grading Plans within Lake Elsinore. Meetings with the applicant may or may not be required at the option of the City and will be determined on a case by case basis. Upon approval of the submitted plans, the firm will certify in writing that the design is in substantial compliance with applicable local, stale and federal requirements. Ultimate responsibility for errors and/or omissions of plans and specifications will continue to rest with the originating design firm, not the Consultant for plan checking or the City. The selected firm(s) may assist the City with various engineering assignments including but not limited to: Plan Checking Services for Private Development Projects • Street and Storm Drain Improvements • Grading, Erosion Control and/or Drainage Plans • Construction Detour Plans • Striping and Signing Plans • Bridge or Retaining Wall Structures not under Building Permit purview • Consistency with other planned improvements • Final and Parcel Maps • Easement, Dedications • Vacations, Quitclaims • Lot Line Adjustments • Parcel Mergers • Water Quality Management Plans Review of Plan Check Submittal Items and Reports • Road Structural Section Calculations • Hydrology and Hydraulic Calculations and Reports • Street Layout and Design • Structure Calculations not under Building Permit purview • Traffic Reports or Studies • Quantity Estimates • Engineer's Cost Estimates • Soils/Geological Reports • Compliance With Current NPDES Permits 3. Review of Technical Specifications for Proposed Improvements in City Road Right of Way • Road Structural Section components • Trench backfill and restoration Storm Drain line and appurtenances Traffic Signal components Signing and Striping 4. Work Flow Methodology • Review for completeness of submittals • Document submittal deficiencies and advise the City as necessary • Identify any additional reference materials required for a thorough plan check such as related offsite Improvement plans, studies or reports. • Conduct site visit as necessary. 5. Provide other Engineering and/or Transportation related professional services as requested in the areas of Plan Checking and/or Development Review technical support. 6. Plan Check Time Initial Submittal — • For typical small private development projects with less than five plan sheets a maximum ten (10) business day turn around time is expected. • For larger more complex projects with six or more plan sheets a maximum fifteen (15) business day turn around time is expected. Subsequent Submittals / Resubmittals — For typical small private development projects with less than five plan sheets a maximum five (5) business day turn around time is expected. • For larger more complex projects with 6 or more plan sheets a maximum ten (10) business day tum around time is expected. Turn around time will be considered to start the date when the submittal has been received by the Consultant. End time will be considered the date that the plan check comment letter is sent out to the applicant. Receipt may include hard copy or electronic mail copy. Details on procedures will be negotiated with the Consultant. Provide a "Fast Track" expedited on demand review time between 3 to 5 business days depending on complexity of project. 7. Design/Plan Check Criteria and Standards • Attachment B includes this information Suggestions by Consultant of recommended changes to current plan check policies, procedures and guidelines should be made to the City as needed to facilitate the work flow efficiency of both the City/Consultant as well as clear understanding by the private development community. 8. Fees Consultant shall fill in fully burdened rate fees for various plan check types using the form in Attachment A. The City will not pay 'costs". 9. Final Submission — Mylar submission to City Hall 10. Develop Check List — consultant shall review and within first year, evaluate and as needed make recommendations to improve current Engineering Plan Check Criteria and Checklists. EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF CHARGES P[u1ScryAgmv1014000 EXHMFT "13" — Pflg0 1 09/08/98 Per sheet charge of $_150.00 will be required on each subsequent plan submittal over four (4) for plan check. Fast Track performance fees shalt be _1.5 times those shown above. fur 4°^, z&4r" 41➢ice ail WIN. � 3r f I�% t�a�%{� ni x b.y Y.^i, 100 Cubic Yards or $200.20 75% of City's fees Less: 750/0 of City's fees ._,-.._ T— $300,000-$700,000 101 — 1,000 Cubic $220.00 for the first 100 cubic yards, plus 75% of City's fees Yards $50.00 for each additional 100 cubic $1,000,000 and 2,5% yards or fraction thereof x 91°% e 1,001 — 10,000 Cubic $670.00 for the fust 1,000 cubic yards, 75% of City's fees Yards: plus $50.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof x 91% 10,001 — 100,000 Cubic $1,120.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, 75% of City's fees Yards: plus $190.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof x 91 % 100,601 — 400,000 $2,830-0 0 for the first 100,000 cubic 75% of City's fees Cubic Yards: yards, plus $110.00 for each additional 100,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof x 91% Over 400,000 Cubic $6,130.00 for the first 400,000 cubic 75% of City's fees i Yards: yards, plus $110.00 for each additional 100,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof x 91% REVISIONS to $450.00 per sheet 80% of City's fees approved plans Per sheet charge of $_150.00 will be required on each subsequent plan submittal over four (4) for plan check. Fast Track performance fees shalt be _1.5 times those shown above. r i ail a �pyv��y °iyv ^F � 3r _ � ^5. ;5�• V _ 0450,000 4.5% 750% of City's fees $50,0004300,000 4.0°% 750/0 of City's fees ._,-.._ T— $300,000-$700,000 -- 3.5% --- -.._.�_--------.—.... 75%of City's fees $700,00041,000,000 3.0% 75% of City's fees $1,000,000 and 2,5% 75% of City's fees i e Revised or Redesigned Public Works Improvement Plans $450 per sheet 80% of city's fees Traffic Signing & Striping, $450 per sheet 80% of City's fees Traffic Control, Haul Route Plans (as part of improvement plan set) Traffic Control as part of Per hour rate for $145 per hour encroachment permit review time, application (1 1 x I7) 'tip • AT�h @ BS.{. Q A 9 BFill A ji .1 ' F.( d �'1Vr .N: 3 r' ^g 'r ° $$ • t; 3�r`p1��, ."n Flg1 ISI �Jt Yb h la �¢n, 4NuL'a.�0ry'dnnlin'S gl "i�,72/o of City's fees Additional per sheet charge of $_150.00 will be required on each subsequent bond copy plan re -submittal over four (4) the above may be made on the fifth submittal for plan check. (Mylar submittal is included in the initial fee.) Fast Track performance fees shall be — 1.5 times those shown above. Fast Track is expedited, on demand with turn around time between 3 to 5 business days. U. hint Tract Map $1,700 + $55 per 80% of City's fees Parcel Map $1,600 + $45 per 80% of City's fees Reelesigned7rNeVIP cel -Mi in $d'S0 per sheet —80070 ofCity s Cees^ Process Revised Approvedi Tract ucel $450 per sheet 80% of City's fees Maps Lot Line Adjustments -Two Lots $400 80% of city's fees Lot Linc Adjustment -More than $500 + $55 per lot 80% of City's fees two lots Dedication: Casement, Right of $440 RO% of City's fees Certificate of Compliance $450 80% of City's fees Parcel Merger $400 '$25 per tot 80% of City's fees —..otAba- - tion---..._ Street Abandonment/Vacation ... _.------.. $7,100 .. _._ 80% of City's Fees Certificate of Correotiou - -'-'--------_____-- $450 80% of City's fees aterQua111yMauagementPlan $1,750.00 --..._.-.-_.---90%----- _.__.. _. 90%of City's fees QMP) Review - RELIMINARY ...._—._......------------- [wTtcr QuafityManagementPfau$1750.00QMP) --__ Review - FINAL Client#: 15915 F111i6t/_C9PII ACORD- CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERM S, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMBS SIIOWIN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 111051 LTR 3/1412013)NYYY) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Dealey, Renton & Associates P. O. Box 10550 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Santa Ana, CA 92711-0550 " 714 427-6810 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC It INSURED INSURER& Travelers Property Casualty Co 25674 Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions 5 Bergamo msuar.-.R B: Twin City Fire Ins. Co. --- INSURER C. XL Specialty Insurance Co. 37885 Irvine, CA 92614 INSURER D: INSUREIiE General Llab. COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE L(STET)BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICAI"Ii D. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERM S, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMBS SIIOWIN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 111051 LTR NSR-,-_ T _YPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICYEFFECTIVB GATE (MMIDOIYY) POLICYEXPIRATION DATE MMOIDMI" LIMITS -- A GENERAL LIABILITY 6806005N531 07/08/13 07108/14 EACH OCCURRENCE $1000000 X COMM[RCIAL G{NERAL LIADILIIV General Llab. DAMAGE TEMS01'J_NTED $1666 DQD CLAIMS MARC 510CCOR excludes claims MEDEXP(AnyPnd Person) $10,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $1000000 _ arising out of GENERM.AGGREGAIE $2000000 the performance GENT. AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP)OPAGG $2600000_ Of professional POLICY X PRO- LOC PIFTT Services. A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO BA6005N936 07/00/13 _ 07/68114 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (En dreBent) $1,QDD,DDD BOOILYINJURY (Per Rcrsdnl $ — Y ALL OWNED AUTOS SCIIEUUL[D AU TOS X X HIREDAUTOS NON-OWNEDAUTOS BODILY INJURY (Perenctlenl) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per..rdnnQ $ GARAGE LIABILITY ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ _AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC S ANY AUTO I $ AUTO ONLY: AGG EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGRIGIATE $ DEDUCTINLE $ RETENTION S B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 57WECLP9614 10/15112 10115/13 X we srni0� oTH- EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRILTORIPARINUVEXECUTNL sL, hncH ncclDeNr $1,000 006 E.L. DISEASE - r:A EMPLOYBL - $1000,000 OITICURIMEMBEREXCLUDED9 1( yes, de rbe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS We,t E.LDISEASE.POLICYLIMIT $1,000,000 C (TITLES Professional DPS9709250 07108!13 07/08/14 $1,000,000 per claim Liability y1,000,000 annl aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/ SPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: Professional Consulting Services The City of Lake Elsinore, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are additional insureds on General and Auto Liability policies as required by written contract. City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Dina Purvis Public Works Dept. 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 THE ABOVE DESC WBEO POLICIES BE CANCEt LED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION THE ISSUING INSURER WILL KWXx"RX§MAIL. —30— DAY$WROTEN THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE ACUKU 25 (ZU01/013) 1 of 1 #S638546/M638528 TMN 0 AUUKU UURPOHA I ION 19UU Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 10) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-649 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 wwod.lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6/1812015 CITY OF LADE LS1110RE %. DREAM EXTREMEn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: AWARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR 1-15/MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE DESIGN SERVICES Recommendations 1. Award Agreement for Professional Services to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions for the Design of the I-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and traffic Signals. 2. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $238,668 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney, Background Main Street intersects Interstate 15 and has been identified as a significant alternative traffic route with future roadway realignment plans. Anticipated development, including the proposed Franklin Street interchange and realignment of Camino Del Norte, warrants the construction of traffic signals and widening of ramps at Main Street. Discussion The design improvements will provide plans for a safe improved traffic flow on Main Street at the 1-15 interchange. The scope of service includes the design of traffic signals, and final plans, specifications, as well as construction support services for a streamlined project. Professional Services Agreement — 1-15/Main St. June 23, 2015 Page 2 Additional scope of services details will include the following services: Data collection Engineering reports Environmental Clearance Construction phase support Contract plans Right-of-way engineering Construction bidding support Geotechnical Engineering Construction is expected in the summer of 2016 following approval of plan documents. Fiscal Impact This project is included in the adopted FY 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program budget and will be financed by T.R.I.P. (Fund 121) and Measure A (Fund 112). Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Public Works Director Approved by: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Attachments: Professional Services Agreement Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Proposal AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Main Street Interchange, Project No. Z10017 Design Services This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions ("Consultant") RECITALS The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: 1-15/Main Street Interchange design. The scope of service includes: Geometric Approval Drawings, Environmental Clearance, Final PS&E, and Construction Support. A. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, dated May 26, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. C. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. PSA with Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Professional Services 2015 Page 1 C, Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed TWO HUNDRED THIRY EIGHT THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY EIGHT DOLLARS ($238,668) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. •'SID a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City Page 3 may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. Page 4 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of and to the extent of Consultant's negligence or other wrongful conduct in the performance of this agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coveraqe. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering Page 5 comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. V. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. Page 6 C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Attn: Ati Eskandari, P.E., Principal 17777 Main Street, Suite G2 Irvine, CA 92614 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. Page 7 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21, Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Consultant's Proposal Exhibit B - Subcontractors Listed "CONSULTANT" Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Ati Eskandari, P.E. Principal/Vice President Page 10 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES & FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A May 26, 2015 City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention: Jim Smith, Interim Public Works Director Subject: 1-15/Main Street Interchange Scope of Services and Fee Proposal based on Caltrans Streamline Project - Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) and Construction Support Dear Jim: Per your request, we have prepared a Scope of Services and Fee proposal to secure the necessary approvals for the 1-15/Main Street interchange project. The Scope of Work assumes that all of the proposed improvements will be within public right of way and that the construction cost within state right of way does not exceed $3,000,000. Once again, I appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Lake Elsinore and assisting in the process of the approval of the necessary documents to provide a safer transportation facility in the City of Lake Elsinore. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at 949-212-7927. Sincerely, Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions '46 FiskRpWdRrY Ati Eskandari, PE Principal/Project Manager Attachments Scope of Work Fee Proposal Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. 17777 Main Street, Suite G2, Irvine, CA 92614 rxf-ttBTT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1-1 5/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals I. GENERAL A. The Services described hereunder shall be performed by the Consultant as follows: Geometric Approval Drawings (GADS), Environmental Clearance, Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E); and Construction Support for a Caltrans Streamline Project. Consultant shall, upon receipt of the appropriate written Authorization to Proceed for the respective Task, commence performance of the applicable work. B. The Client will make available to the Consultant all data applicable to the Project that is in the possession of the Client. The Client will provide assistance to the Consultant in its efforts to obtain similar applicable information from other governmental agencies, jurisdictions, and private parties. C. The Client will designate a Project Manager to review and approve the Services, render decisions, and provide information and direction to the Consultant in a timely manner so as not to delay the Consultant's performance. The Consultant will designate a Project Manager to manage the performance of the Services. After the Client has issued an Authorization to Proceed to the Consultant, all contractual communication regarding the Services shall be between the respective project managers. II. SERVICES A. Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Services shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Data Collection Design Surveys Contract Plans Geometric Approval Drawings evaluating traditional traffic signals and/or roundabouts. Title Sheet Typical Cross -Sections Plan (with existing utilities shown) and Profile Construction Details Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans Erosion Control Plans Drainage Plans, Profiles, Details and Quantities Stage Construction, Traffic Handling, Temporary Detours, and Construction Area Signs Pavement Delineation/Sign Plans Retaining Walls Landscape/Irrigation Plans (Modify Existing) Electrical Plans (Traffic Signals) Representative Cross Sections Engineering Reports/Analysis Encroachment Permit Application/Processing Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER) Storm Water Data Report - PS&E Drainage Report Traffic Impact Analysis Material Report and Geotechnical Design Report Special Provisions, Quantities, and Engineer's Estimate Environmental Air Quality Report (ACR) Noise Study Report (NSR) Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impact) NES(MI) Scope of Work-1-15/Main Street Project Page 1 EXI IIBIT A f Cultural Resources Study (ASR/HPSR) Paleontological Impact Report (PIR) Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Environmental Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Deliverables: Consultant shall be responsible for the following: • PS&E submittal at 85%, 100% and Final Mylar's. • Engineering Reports as necessary. • Environmental Clearance • Utility Coordination, as necessary. • A bid package ready for advertising (PS&E) and correcting package as necessary. B. Construction Support Services shall include, but not be limited to, the following: • Construction Bidding Period Support • Construction Period Support C. Description of Required Services 1. Consultant shall prepare roadway PS&E. The work phases, generalized scope of services, and potential work items for each phase are described in Section I, Deliverables, of this Scope of Services. 2. Consultant shall handle public and citizen contacts, as needed in conformance with normal City study procedures. 3. Client will retain responsibility for all final consultation, both informal and formal, with state and federal agencies regarding project mitigation and compensation proposals. Consultant will be available to provide advice and to participate in such consultations at the request of Client. 4. Consultant shall be responsible for reproduction, binding, circulation, and distribution of the engineering reports and engineering drawings pursuant to the requirements of this Scope of Services. 5. It is not the intent of the foregoing paragraph to relieve the Consultant of his professional responsibility during the performance of this contract. In those instances where the Consultant believes a better design or solution is possible, he shall promptly notify the Client of these concerns, together with reasons therefor. 6. The plans, designs, specifications, estimates, calculations, reports, and other documents furnished under this Scope of Services shall be of a quality acceptable to the Client. The criteria for acceptance shall be neat appearance, good organization, and technical and grammatical correctness. Items must have been checked, and the maker and checker must be identified thereon. The minimum standards of appearance, organization, and content for the drawings shall be those on similar type drawings produced by City. 7. The title sheet for specifications and reports and each sheet of plans shall bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of the certificate, and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their preparation. 8. Consultant shall have a quality control plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Project contract. The plan shall establish a process whereby calculations are independently checked; plans are checked, corrected and back -checked; and all job-related correspondence and memoranda are routed and received by affected persons and then bound in appropriate job files. Where several drawings show different work in the same area, means shall be provided to assure that conflicts and misalignment in both new and existing improvements do not exist. 9. All project files and correspondence relating to the Project shall be turned over to Client at the end of the contract. This will include all working data, field data, and background information used in creating the deliverables listed in this Scope of Services. D. Construction Bidding Period Support: Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of Client. While the Project is being advertised for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to Client for resolution. In the event that any items requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications are discovered during the bidding period, said items shall be analyzed by the Consultant for decision by Client as to the proper procedure required. Corrective action taken will either be in the form of an addendum prepared by the Consultant and issued by Client, or by a covering change order after the award of the construction contract. Scope of Work+15/Main Street Project Page 2 EXHIBIT A IF' ,, E. Construction Period Support 1. During construction, Consultant shall furnish all necessary additional drawings for corrections and change orders necessitated by errors and omissions of the Consultant. Such drawings shall be requested in writing from Consultant by Client and shall be provided at no additional cost to Client. The original tracing(s) of drawings and contract wording for change orders shall be submitted to Client for duplication and distribution. 2. Consultant will receive written notification of the award of a construction contract. Upon such notification, Consultant will proceed with the services required by this contract. 3. Consultant shall attend the preconstruction meeting with the successful construction contractor upon notification by Client. 4. Consultant shall review all submittals and shop drawings submitted by the construction contractor. Consultant shall complete shop plan reviews within two weeks of receipt. Contract change order reviews shall be completed within two working days of receipt. 5. Drawings and change orders required due to actions of Client, which are beyond the scope of Consultant's responsibilities, shall be considered extra services. 6. Consultant shall be available to visit the job site for on-site review of construction, and for other visits to the job site as requested by Client to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Consultant shall bring to the attention of Clients' Resident Engineer any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which Consultant may observe. Consultant shall have no authority to issue instructions on behalf of Client or to deputize another to do so. All agreements shall be between Client and its construction contractor. These provisions shall not be construed as making Consultant responsible for failure of Clients' construction contractor to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents, nor for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures or safety programs related to the work. 7. Consultant shall prepare and deliver to Client the "as -built" plans. F. Design Standards: The plans, specifications and estimates are to be prepared in accordance with City regulations, policies, procedures, manuals and standards, and in compliance with FHWA requirements. 1. Roadway design shall be in accordance with the current Caltrans Highway Design Manual and its revisions. 2. Basic design shall be in accordance with the approved project report, project approval report and final environmental document. 3. Roadway plans shall be prepared in conformance with the general drafting standards accepted by the City. 4. As part of the work involved in the preparation of the plans, specifications and estimates, the Consultant shall prepare and furnish to Client the special provisions for items of work included in the plans. IV. DELIVERABLES A. Consultant shall provide services for the Project in close liaison with City. City will exercise review and approval functions in the development process. Milestone project reviews will be performed for the specific products and deliverables listed herein. City will conduct these reviews. B. Where Consultant is required by this Scope of Services to prepare and submit studies, reports, plans, etc., to Client, these shall be submitted in draft form at the scheduled time. The schedule shall provide adequate time for Client and City to direct revisions before final submission. C. The products shall be delivered in accordance with the following schedule: Scope of Work-1-15/Main Street Project Page 3 EXHIBIT A FEE PROPOSAL 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Rai Widening and Traffic Signals Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 5 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cost PHASE No. of Sheets Hours/Sheet Hours MILESTONE 1 - PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE (PS&E) Data Collection 1 40 40 $4,347 Design Surveys 0 0 0 $0 Obtain As -Built Plans and Utility Research Subtotal 1 40 $4,347 Contract Plans (GADS, 85%, 100%, and Final PS&E) 60 120 $13,042 Geometric Approval Drawings (GADS) 2 4 4 $435 Title Sheet 1 1 8 8 $869 Typical Cross Sections 4 40 160 $17,390 Plan (Wih Existing Utilities Shown)/Profile 4 30 120 $13,042 Construction Details (Includes Rock Landscape) 16 32 $3,478 Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans 2 20 40 $4,347 Erosion Control Plans 2 3 18 54 $5,869 Drainage Plans, Profiles, and Quantities 14 56 $6,086 Stage Construction/Traffc HandlingrFemporary DefOurs/Constructlen 4 Pavement Delineation/Sign Plans 3 2 16 32 48 64 $5,217 $6,956 Retaining Walls Landscape/Irrigation Plans (Modify Existing) 4 32 128 $13,912 Electrical Plans (Traffic Signals/Lighting) 3 52 8 156 80 $16,955 $8,695 Representative Cross Sections (50' Intervals) 10 Subtotal 45 1,070 $116,294 Engineering Reports/Analysis 1 8 8 $869 Encroachment Permit Application/Processing 40 40 $4,347 Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER) 1 1 48 48 $5,217 Storm Water Data Report-PS&E 1 52 52 $5,652 Drainage Report 1 48 48 $5,217 Traffic Impact Analysis 1 180 180 $33,850 Material Report and Geotechnical Design Report 52 52 $5,652 Special Provisions/Quantities/Engineers Estimate 1 Subtotal 7 428 $60,804 Environmental 1 88 68 $9,825 Air Quality Report 1 87 87 $ 5 Noise Study Report Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impact) 1 46 46 $55,61,61 5 Cultural Resources Study (ASR/HPSR) 1 54 54 39 $5,300 $4,155 Paleontological Impact Report (PIR) 1 39 4 4 $443 Categorical Exclusion/Categorical Exemption (Cl 1 28 $3,920 Environmental PM, Meeting, and Quality Control 1 28 Subtotal 7 326 $39,833 Project Management-QA/QC-Meeting-Administration 1 120 120 $13,042 Subtotal 61 1,984 $234,321 MILESTONE 2- CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 1 40 40 $4,347 TOTAL 2,024 $238,668 Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 5 EXHIBIT A FEE PROPOSAL I-15/Main Street Interchange StreettRamp Widening and Traffic Signals Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 6 COMPANY: SCOPE OF WORK- DATE REVISION SCES IGADS, Environmental Clearance and PS&E 05/08/15 PROJECT: Work Order: 1-15/Main Street - Street/Ramp widening/Traffic Signals DIRECT LABOR Am Staff Project Manager 273 $145.00 $39,686 Staff Senior Civil Engineer 151 $140.00 $21,140 Staff Senior Civil Engineer 137 $120.00 $16,440 Staff Civil Engineer 395 $110.00 $43,450 Staff CADD Operator Technician 410 $80.00 $32.800 Staff Bridge Engineer 0 $0.00 $0 Staff Landscape Architect 0 $0.00 $0 Staff Administrative/Project Control; 151 $70.00 $10.570 TOTAL HOURS 1 1,517 $163,985 1,518 OTHER DIRECT COST Reproduction Cost 1 LS $1,000,00 $1,000 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $1,000.00 OUTSIDE SERVICES Wo fee) %1.11111 i.�_.• MFAN Group Delta Consultants Geotechnical $33,850 LSA Environmental $39833 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES —t� $73,683 TOTAL COST Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 6 EXHIBIT A FEE PROPOSAL 1-16/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals K IDATE REVISION COMPANY: GROUP DELTA SCOPE OF WOR Material Roport/Gemechnical Design Report 04127115 PROJECT; Work Order: 1-15/Main Street - Street/Ramp Widening,7raffic Signals DIRECT LABOR �$295.00 Staff Pinni 4 �I'Ibu Staff Associate 65 $225.00 $14.6251 Staff Senior 0 $175,00 $0 Staff Project Engineer 33 $155.00 $5,115 Staff Staff 32 $135.00 $4,320 Staff Field[Lab Technician 20 $80.00 $1,600 Staff Illutrated/Drafting 18 $95.00 $1,710 Staff Clertical and Support 8 $75 $600 TOTAL HOURS 180 $29.150,00 OTHER DIRECT COST :ll WY Field Exploration 7 LS $3.500.00 $3,500 Traffic Control 7 LS $1,200.00 81.200 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES OUTSIDE S�, S Re N F "�',A CON TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES 10 TOTAL COST Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 7 EXHIBIT A FEE PROPOSAL 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals f - rry-� COMPANY:SCOPE OF WORK DATE REVISION LSA Environmental 04/27/15 PROJECT: Work Ortler: 1-15/Main Street - SlreeURamp Widening/Traffic Signals DIRECT LABOR 7777 .; NAME, T, is :'- BO.S1TfON> .. Tia{OURS ,>` RATS , s't'.A1YIDUNT+s Staff Principal/PM 6 $205 $1,230 Staff Associate 48,5 $135 $6,548 Staff Principal/Air 10 $205 $2,050 Slag Associate -Bio 27 $130 $3,510 Staff Associate -Air 49 $150 $7,350 Staff Senior Noise 70 $120 $8,400 Staff Senior Cultural 24 $95 $2,280 Staff Research Assist 16 $70 $1,120 Staff Environ Planner 0 $95 $0 Staff GIS/Graphics 36 $100 $3,600 Staff Editor 29 $105 $3,045 Staff Sr Admin Assist 10 $70 $700 TOTAL HOURS 326 $39,833 OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $0 OUTSIDE SERVICES (w/o fee) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $0.0 TOTAL COST $39,833 Scope of Work- 1-15/Main Street Project Page 8 11 EXHIBIT A ,„ I as S�siii5si�sizxi sLii�ifr�(�4i5axi�isf ;�&a�6Li LaisZ x x ;.zssaxsss.sx x sxx x.."xxx ^. xx xx x"sx5cs F. �{ s8 ^BRBReRBB BF �'t r, ei QF{FBa;12Bo 3TeSby5fl3B39 6 � x�S § RdF g k ��L `i`L4�£8b ���x�a $➢3,Ea�" �'����u�cEa fle'cxFrk�r a &�"p3a RA°���g§�"g�flna[nn a no my am OR OCA ^ wl y AI S m d EXHIBIT B SUBCONTRACTORS LISTED N/A 'r�Iil tillrOR!: Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 11) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-650 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elenore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 6/18/2075 CITY of LADE L LSIHOKE �'� DREAM E�CTRIiM [,. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO L.C. PAVING & SEALING, INC. FOR WHISKER'S FISHING BEACH IMPROVEMENTS - CIP PROJECT No. 4369 Recommendations 1. Approve and award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $234,833 for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the total Agreement, pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement. 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. Background The design for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements was completed by BergerABAM on May 11, 2015. The planned improvements include paving the existing dirt parking lot, drainage improvements, solar powered LED lighting, retaining wall to maximize parking and ADA walkway access from the parking lot to the beach area. Use of Permeable Pavers was included in the parking lot design for infiltration purpose, which would treat water runoff from the parking lot prior to discharging into the drainage system. The parking lot improvements will provide 20 standard parking stalls and 2 standard ADA parking spaces and 1 ADA Van accessible stall. Other ancillary improvements include striping, Agreement for Public Works Construction — Whiskers Beach Improvements June 23, 2015 Page 2 concrete wheel stops and PCC sidewalk. The parking lot improvements will provide all weather surface and safe access to the lake front. Discussion Contractor bids were opened publicly on June 11, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The City received eleven (11) bids ranging from the low bid by L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., to the high bid by Hillcrest Contracting. The bid results are summarized below: Contractor (Bidder) Bid Amount 1. L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. $234,832.80 2. D'Ybanag Construction Co. $238,955.00 3. Southwest Construction Co. $249,444.45 4. IVL Contractors, Inc. $257,620.00 5. DM Contracting, Inc. $271,977.00 6. Aramexx Construction $287,961.00 7. Rentex Construction, Inc. (RCI) $289,940.00 8. Roadway Engineering & Contracting $299,685.00 9. Sierra Pacific West $301,702.84 10. Red Hawk Services $305,856.50 11. Hillcrest Contracting $308,889.50 After reference checks and review of recent similar construction projects that were successfully completed with other agencies, it was determined that the City Council should accept the L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. bid. The materials available for inspection are adequate for City staff to support a recommendation that the bid is responsive in the context of completing the project as specified. The Contractor award amount has been rounded up to the nearest dollar for accounting purposes. Agreement for Public Works Construction — Whiskers Beach Improvements June 23, 2015 Page 3 Fiscal Impact Sufficient funds have been allocated in the Capital Improvement Plan budget for the Whisker's Parking Lot Improvement Project and will be funded by Lake Side Facilities DIF (Fund 118). Prepared by: Deepak Solanki Consultant Project Manager Approved by: Jim Smith, P.E. Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Jason Simpson Director Administrative Services Department Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: Agreement for Public Works Construction AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements, Project No. 4369 This Agreement for Public Works Construction ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of June 23, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., a corporation ("Contractor"). The City and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. The Project and Project Documents. Contractor agrees to construct the following public improvements ("work") identified as: Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements (the "Project") The City -approved plans for the construction of the Project, which are incorporated herein by reference are identified as: Parking Lot Improvement Plans for Whisker's Fishing Beach, dated May 12, 2015. The Project Documents include this Agreement and all of the following: (1) the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Documents including Bidder's Proposal as submitted by the Contractor, Contract Documents, General Specifications, Special Provisions, and all attachments and appendices; (2) everything referenced in such documents, such as specifications, details, standard plans or drawings and appendices, including all applicable State and Federal requirements, (3) all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits; and (4) any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending or extending the work contemplated as may be required to insure completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of the above -listed documents are made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 2. Compensation. a. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by City, Contractor agrees to construct the Project, including furnishing all materials and performing all work required for the Project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the Bidder's Proposal, such contract price being TWO HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY THREE dollars ($234,833). b. City hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices set forth, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Project Documents. C. Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the Bidder's Proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Such compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of work during its progress or prior to its acceptance Page 1 including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the Project Documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 3. Completion of Work. a. Contractor shall perform and complete all work within Forty (40) working days from the date of commencement specified in the Notice to Proceed, and shall provide, furnish and pay for all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all taxes, utility and transportation services required for construction of the Project. b. All work shall be performed and completed in a good workmanlike manner in strict accordance with the drawings, specifications and all provisions of this Agreement as hereinabove defined and in accordance with applicable laws, codes, regulations, ordinances, and any other legal requirements governing the Project. C. Contractor shall not be excused with respect to the failure to so comply by any act or omission of the City, the Director of Public Works, the City Engineer, a City inspector, or a representative of any of them, unless such act or omission actually prevents the Contractor from fully complying with the requirements of the Project Documents, and unless the Contractor protests at the time of such alleged prevention that the act or omission is preventing the Contractor from fully complying with the Project Documents. Such protest shall not be effective unless reduced to writing and filed with the City within three (3) working days of the date of occurrence of the act or omission preventing the Contractor from fully complying with the Project Documents. d. City and Contractor recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement and further agree that if the work called for under the Agreement is not completed within the time hereinabove specified, damages will be sustained by the City and that, it is and will be impracticable or extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual amount of damages the City will sustain in the event of, and by reason of, such delay. It is, therefore, agreed that such damages shall be presumed to be in the amount of ONE THOUSAND dollars ($1,000) per calendar day, and that the Contractor will pay to the City, or City may retain from amounts otherwise payable to Contractor, such amount for each calendar day by which the Contractor fails to complete the work, including corrective items of work, under this Agreement within the time hereinabove specified and as adjusted by any changes to the work. 4. Changes to Work. City and Contractor agree that the City may make changes to the work, or suspend the work, and no matter how many changes, such changes or suspensions are within the contemplation of the Contractor and City and will not be a basis for a compensable delay claim against the City nor be the basis for a liquidated damages claims against the Contractor. Any change to the work shall be by way of a written instrument ("change order') signed by the City and the Contractor, stating their agreement to the following: a. The scope of the change in the work; b. The amount of the adjustment to the contract price; and Page 2 c. The extent of the adjustment to the Schedule of Performance. The Director of Public Works is authorized to sign any change order provided that sufficient contingency funds are available in the City's approved budget for the Project. All change in the work authorized by the change order shall be performed under the applicable conditions of the Project Documents. City and Contractor shall negotiate in good faith and as expeditiously as possible the appropriate adjustments for such changes. 5. Bonds. Contractor shall provide, before commencing work, a Faithful Performance Bond and a Labor and Material Bond, each for one -hundred percent (100%) of the contract price in the form that complies with the Project Documents and is satisfactory to the City Attorney. 6. Non -Assignability. Neither this Agreement nor any rights, title, interest, duties or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned, transferred, conveyed or otherwise disposed of by Contractor without the prior written consent of City. 7. Licenses. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it holds the contractor's license or licenses set forth in the Project Documents, is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5, and holds such other licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Contractor. Contractor represents and warrants to City that Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 8. Indemnity. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Contractor shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 9. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Contractor, at Contractor's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. Page 3 i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Contractor shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Contractor for City. In the event that Contractor is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Contractor shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Contractor arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iv. Builder's Risk Coverage. Prior to the commencement of any construction of the Project, Contractor shall obtain (or cause to be obtained) and keep in force during the term of any construction, builder's risk insurance insuring for all risks of physical loss of or damage (excluding the perils of earthquake and flood). b. Endorsements. Each general commercial liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. Page 4 ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Contractor shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Contractor: L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. Attn: Jose Andris Salinas 996 Borden Road San Marcos, CA 92069 Page 5 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of agreement between the City and Contractor. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Contractor and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 13. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 14. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 15. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 16. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 17. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 18. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 19. Authority to Enter Agreement and Administration. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non -monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. The Director of Public Works shall act as the Project administrator on behalf of the City. Page 6 20. Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 21. Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 22. Prevailing Wages. a. Contractor and all subcontractors shall adhere to the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and as published by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770, 1773, and 1773.2. Copies of these rates and the latest revisions thereto are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore and are available for review upon request. b. Contractor's attention is directed to the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5 and 1777.6. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of these Sections. The statutory provisions for penalties for failure to comply with the State's wage and the hours laws will be enforced. C. Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 require the Contractor and all subcontractors to pay not less than the prevailing wage rates to all workmen employed in the execution of the contract and specify forfeitures and penalties for failure to do so. The minimum wages to be paid are those determined by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Labor Code Section 1776 requires the Contractor and all subcontractors to keep accurate payroll records, specifies the contents thereof, their inspection and duplication procedures and certain notices required of the Contractor pertaining to their location. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages will be enforced. If the Project has been awarded to Contractor on or after April 1, 2015, Contractor and its subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. Beginning January 1, 2016, Contractor and its subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner without regard to when the Project was awarded to Contractor. d. Labor Code Section 1777.5 requires Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint Apprenticeship Committee nearest the site of the public works project, which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen to be used in the performance of the Agreement. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if the Contractor employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable Page 7 trade and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, contributions, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the State Director of Industrial Relations or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, Labor Code Section 1777.6 provides that it shall be unlawful to refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as registered apprentices solely on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, or age. e. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work, as set forth in Labor Code Section 1810. 23. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. [Signatures on next page] Page 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: "CONTRACTOR" L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., a Corporation By: Its: City Clerk By. Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Page 9 �Il........ Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 12) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-651 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elsinore.00 Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 CITY OF LAKE LSIROKIE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Agreement For Operational Management of La Laguna Resort And Boat Launch Between Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. And City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation Approve the attached Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. Background On March 10, 2015 Council approved the cancellation of the agreement with Pyramid Enterprise, Inc. (Rocky Mountain Recreation) for operations of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. The cancellation was effective on June 1, 2015. As part of the transition process, staff began discussions with William Johnson, the owner of William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental. Mr. Johnson is the concessionaire of the general store and bait shop (the "General Store") and was interested in managing and operating the campground and boat launch along with implementing guest services such as boat rentals. On May 12, 2015, the City Council approved the selection of Mr. Johnson (doing business as William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental) to be the operator and approved the form of an Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. Operational Agreement for La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch June 23, 2015 Page 2 The City and Mr. Johnson engaged in additional discussions concerning the ultimate form of the operations agreement and Mr. Johnson's formation of a separate corporate entity. With the inclusion of Mr. Johnson's new corporate entity and various revisions to the form agreement, the City Attorney advised that the final form of the operations agreement should be approved by the City Council at a subsequent public meeting. The corporate entity owned by Mr. Johnson is currently operating the resort on a 30 -day interim agreement under the City Manager's signature authority. Discussion The proposed Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch (the "Agreement") provides that Mr. Johnson's corporate entity, Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc., ("Williams") will oversee all aspects of the resort operation until December 31, 2015. The Agreement can be extended by mutual agreement of the City and Williams for one additional six (6) month term. Key financial terms of the Agreement include: • Resort staff will be employees of Williams. • 100% of revenues from resort operations such as boat launch fees, day use passes, parking fees, campground rental fees and other use fees will be paid to the City. • Resort staffing levels are called out in Exhibit B to the Agreement and set a weekly fee to be paid by the City depending on seasonal adjustments to staff levels. These staff levels exclude staffing for the General Store. • Expenses from the General Store operations will be borne by Williams. • The City will receive a 4% concession fee on the General Store's gross revenues. General Store related revenues include sales of merchandise, food, beverages, recreation supplies along with recreational rentals, such as boats, kayaks and other watercraft. • Williams will be responsible for "housekeeping" activities such as keeping the resort clean, cleaning public restrooms and showers, trash pickup, campsite preparation, minor repairs, mowing and edging, and other minor landscape work. • The City will assume responsibility for larger maintenance tasks including fire clearance; tree trimming and removal; repairs, painting, sewer lines, asphalt patching, water lines or valves, roofing, fences, septic tanks along with paying for utilities. Eventually, the City of Lake Elsinore will assume full operations of all facilities and, through a competitive interview process, select staff will continue as City of Lake Elsinore employees. Operational Agreement for La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch June 23, 2015 Page 2 The preliminary phasing presented to the City Council on May 12, 2015 necessary to meet the ultimate goal of transitioning the resort to a world class facility are unchanged. Fiscal Impact As indicated at the May 12, 2015 public meeting on this matter, "startup" funding was necessary to begin changing the way La Laguna functions. The following were immediate needs for the campground beginning June 1: Operator Staffing Fee $16,000 (for approximately 2 Yz weeks) Infrastructure: $20,000 Operations (equipment): $10,000 Supplies: $ 5,000 Total: $51,000 Expenses for Infrastructure, equipment operations and particular items from supplies will be utilized throughout the year. With the City overseeing the operations, the City will retain 100% of the revenue generated through boat launch and campground rentals, along with other fees as noted above; 4% of the gross revenue generated through the General Store; and 10% of the revenue generated by separate aquatic concessionaires. Funds will be reimbursed over the twelve months of operation. Prepared by: Johnathan O. Skinner Director of Community Services Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachment: Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF LA LAGUNA RESORT AND BOAT LAUNCH THIS AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF LA LAGUNA RESORT AND BOAT LAUNCH (the "Agreement"), dated for identification purposes as of June I, 2015, is made by and between the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") and WILLIAMS BAIT & 'TACKLE, INC., a California corporation, doing business as William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental (hereinafter referred to as "Operator"). RECITALS This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts which are a substantive part hereof: A. The Lake Elsinore Recreation Area ("LERA") was established by the State of California for the purpose of malting available to the people for their enjoyment the natural, cultural, and recreational values of the largest natural lake in Southern California. B. The function of the City at the LERA is to manage, protect, and, where necessary, to restore its natural and cultural resources and values for their perpetuation in accordance with the public park and recreational purpose; to interpret these values effectively: and to provide facilities and services, consistent with the purpose of the park, that are necessary for the full enjoyment of the park. C. The City and Operator wish to set forth the terms and conditions by which the Premises will be maintained and operated. D. The City Council finds that it is appropriate that this Agreement is entered into to achieve the above stated proposes and to promote the safety and convenience of the general public in the use and enjoyment of, and the enhancement of recreational and park experiences at the premises, that the Agreement is not being entered into solely for its revenue producing potential, that the proposed operating plan is compatible with the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area General Plan, and that the operating plan will not result in the loss of public park space. NOW, 'THEREFORE, in consideration Of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: USE GRANTED 1.1 Operator is hereby authorized to operate and maintain the Premises including authority to (i) rent campsites; (ii) allow the launching of boats and personal water craft onto Lake Elsinore; (iii) sell bait, tackle and boat and water ski parts and accessories; (iv) charge fees for rental of boats including, but not limited to, sailboards (powered and unpowered) and personal water craft vessels; (v) sell prepackaged food and non-alcoholic beverages: and (vi) allow entry by individuals and groups into designated day -use only areas. Lai Logunu Operations Agreement 061715 Final docx Page I 1.2 Operator understands and agrees that this Agreement is by license and not lease; confers only permission to occupy and use the Premises described for prescribed purposes in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter specified without granted or reserving to Operator any interest or estate therein; the expenditure of capital and/or labor in the course of use and occupancy thereunder shall not confer any interest or estate in the premises by virtue of said use, occupancy and/or expenditure of money thereon; and it is the intention of the parties to limit the right of use granted herein to a personal, revocable and assignable privilege of use in the Premises for the license granted herein. 2. PROPERTY 2.1 The operation shall be conducted on the real property referred to herein as the Premises and commonly known as the La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch as shown in the attached Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 2.2 The Premises shall be used only and exclusively for purposes authorized herein, and such other purposes as are related thereto provided express approval therefore is granted by the City Manager or his/her designee, and for no other purposes whatsoever. 2.3 Operator acknowledges personal inspection of the Premises and the surrounding area and evaluation of the extent to which the physical condition thereof will affect its operations. Operator accepts the Premises in its present physical condition and agrees to make no demands upon City for any improvements or alterations thereof. 2.4 Any improvements, additions, alterations, or changes to the Premises shall be subject to prior approval by the City Manager, and applicable permits shall be secured in compliance with such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the City. Any construction shall be at Operator's expense. 2.5 The temporary trailer/building designated as "William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental" (the "General Store") is owned by and is the property of Operator. Improvements, equipment and inventory related to the General Store shall owned by and be the property of the Operator, provided however that and equipment and software related to the campground reservation system shall be the property of and owned by the City and/or its reservation software vendor. Ownership of all other structures, buildings or improvements constructed by Operator upon the Premises and all alterations, additions or betterments thereto, shall become the property of the City Without compensation being paid therefor, subject to the rights granted to the Operator hereinabove. 3. TERM 3.1 The Initial Term of this Agreement with respect to the Premises shall commence on the Commencement Date for a period of six (6) months. La I agima Operations Agreement 061715 PinaI docx Page 2 3.2 Provided Operator is not then in default under the terms of this Agreement, at the expiration of the Initial Operating Term, the City (acting through its City Manager) and Operator may, upon both party's mutual agreement, extend the term of this Agreement with respect to the Premises for one (1) six (6) month terms, on the same terms and conditions as contained in this Agreement (the "Extension Term"). 3.3 In the event the Operator holds over beyond the term herein provided with the consent, expressed or implied of City, such holding shall be from month to month only, subject to the conditions of this Agreement; shall not be a renewal thereof; and shall be at the monthly compensation provided herein. 4. REVENUES AND PAYMENTS 4.1 Campground and Boat Launch Operations Revenues. Operator shall pay and remit to City the Campground and Boat Launch Operations Revenues. 4.2 General Store Concession Fee. In consideration for the use granted herein, Operator shall pay the City a sum equal to four percent (4%) of General Store Gross Receipts. 4.3 La Laguna Operating Fee. In consideration for the Operator's operational responsibilities, City shall pay to Operator the La Laguna Operating Fee. 4.4. Payments to the City of the Campground and Boat Launch Operations Revenues and the General Store Concession Fee shall be made on or before the fifteenth (15"') day of the calendar month following each month of the term of this Agreement, with the first payment to be made no later than July 15, 2015. Payment shall be by check or draft made payable to the City of Lake Elsinore shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to the City of Lake Elsinore, Attention: Director of Administrative Services, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. A late payment charge of two percent (2%) per month shall be added to any late payment received after the last day of the calendar month in which payment is due. However, the late payment charge herein provided may be waived, whenever the City Manager finds the late payment excusable by reason of extenuating circumstances. At no time during the term of this Agreement shall the City be obligated to notify the Operator of the accumulation of late payment charges. 4.5 The La Laguna Operating Fee shall be paid by City to Operator in advance on a biweekly basis during the term of this Agreement and will be based on the Schedule of Fees and Hours set forth in Exhibit "B," which is incorporated herein. The City agrees to pay $16,000 on or about .lune 10, 2015, or a Reasonably practical thereafter, for the La Laguna Operating Fee for the weeks of June I through June 7 ($6,717.00) and June 8 through June 14 ($6,717), provided that a credit in the amount of $2,566.00 shall be applied to the La Laguna Operating Fee for the week of June 15 through June 22. Payment shall be by check or draft made payable to William Johnson dba William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental and shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc., 198 S. Nebraska Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. The payment of the La Laguna Operating Fee shall be withheld in the event that the Operator has failed to make a timely payment of the Cannpground and Boat Launch Operations Revenues and the General Store Concession Fee as provided in Section 4.4. Ia Lapna Operations Agreement 001715 Final docs Page 3 5. ACCOUNTING RECORDS 5.1 All sales shall be recorded by means of cash registers which publicly display the amount of each sale and automatically issue a customer's receipt or certify the amount recorded on a sales slip. Said cash registers shall in all cases have locked -in sales totals and transaction counters which are constantly accumulating and which cannot, in either case, be reset. In addition, such cash registers must have a tape located within the register upon which transaction numbers and sales details are imprinted. Beginning and ending cash register readings shall be made a matter of daily records. In the event of a technical or electrical failure of the cash registers, Operator shall record by hand all collections, and issue a sequentially pre -numbered customer receipt in a Tike manner. 5.2 Operator shall maintain a method of accounting which shall, to the satisfaction of the City Manager, correctly and accurately reflect the gross receipts and disbm-sements of Operator in connection with the operation. The method of accounting, including bank accounts established for said operation shall be separate from the accounting system used for any other business operated by Operator or for recording Operator's personal financial affairs. Such method shall include the keeping of the following documents: 5.2.1 Regular books of accounting such as general ledgers; 5.2.2 Journals including any supporting and underlying documents such as vouchers, checks, tickets, bank statements, etc.; 5.2.3 State and federal income tax returns and sales tax returns and checks and other documents providing payment of sums shown which shall be kept in confidence by City; 5.2.4 Cash register tapes (daily tapes may be separated but shall be retained so that from day to day the sales and/or rentals can be identified); 5.2.5 Any other accounting records that the City Manager deems necessary for proper reporting of receipts; 5.3 All documents, books and accounting records shall be open for inspection and re- inspection at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement and for twelve (12) months thereafter. In addition, the City may from time to time conduct an audit and re -audit ofthe books and business conducted by Operator and observe the operation of the business so that accuracy of the above records can be confirmed. 5.4 Operator shall furnish the City Manager with a monthly gross receipts report showing the amount payable therefrom to the City. Such a report shall accompany each minimum rent or percentage rent payment required to be made as provided herein. I'he monthly reporting period shall be by calendar month rather than monthly anniversary date of the effective date of this Agreement. In addition thereto, Operator shall Furnish a semi-annual profit and loss statement and a balance sheet prepared by a person and in a form acceptable to the City. The Lu Lagwm operations Agreement 0017151 mal ioc page 4 semi-annual profit and loss statement shall be submitted within sixty (60) days of the close of the Initial Term and Extension Term. Said closing date shall be determined by reference to the date for commencement of the term herein provided. 5.5 In the event that an audit or review conducted by the City's Director of Administrative Services and/or City Manager finds that, due to Operator's non-compliance with its obligation to report gross receipts received in connection with its operations authorized herein, an actual loss and/or a projected loss of revenue to City can be determined, the City Manager may, at his option, (1) bill Operator for said losses, said amount to be paid to City within thirty (30) days following billing therefor unless otherwise specified by City Manager; and/or (2) use the Security deposit as provided for herein; and/or, (3) assess liquidated damages. The parties agree that it will be impracticable or extremely difficult to fix the extent of actual damages resulting from the failure of the Operator to correctly report gross receipts, and a projected loss of revenue due to City. The parties hereby agree that under the current circumstances a reasonable estimate of such damages is Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day for each day of the loss period as dctermined by City for liquidated damages in said amount. Should the City Manager find that the additional rental payment due to City exceeds two percent (2%) of the total amount which should have been paid as determined by such review or audit and observation, and there being no reasonable basis for the failure to report and pay thereon, Operator shall also pay the cost of the audit as determined by City and pay any penalty heretofore provided for the delinquent payments. 5.6 Operator shall cause all of its sub-operators to comply with these requirements except that a sub-operator shall only be required to establish and maintain those accounting records that the City Manager deems necessary to examine the reported gross receipts in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. 6. OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES 6.1 Operator shall conform to and abide by all municipal and City ordinances, and all state and federal Taws and regulations, insofar as the same or any of them are applicable; and where permits and/or licenses are required for the operation of the Premises, any related activity and/or any construction authorized herein, the same must be first obtained fi•om the regulatory agency having.jurisdiction thereover. In particular, Operator shall require that all boat operators utilizing the Boat Launch to access Lake Elsinore have purchased a City Lake Use Pass. Operator shall pre-purchase Lake Use Passes from the City and shall offer such Lake Use Passes for sale to the public at all time during operation of the Premises. Further, Operator shall conform to and abide by all rules and regulations and policies of the City. 6.2 Operator agrees to exercise every reasonable effort to not allow any loud, boisterous or disorderly persons about the Premises. 6.3 Operator shall not knowingly permit any illegal activities to be conducted upon the Premises. La Laguna Opemlions Agrecmcni 061715 1'maLdocx Page 5 6.4 Operator shall not post signs upon any City property or improvements thereon unless prior approval therefor is obtained from the City Manager. 6.5 Operator shall use its best efforts to maximize the public use of the Premises and the facilities thereon in accordance with the conditions herein. However, Operator shall not interfere with the public use of the remaining areas ofthe Lake Elsinore Recreation Area. 6.6 Operator's Staff 6.6.1 Operator shall maintain an adequate and proper staff for its authorized operations based on commercially reasonable budget parameters and Reasonable needs. Operator shall designate one member of the staff as an Operations Manager with whom City may deal on a daily basis. Any person selected by Operator as Operations Manager shall be skilled in the management of businesses similar to the campground/boat launch operations and shall be subject to reasonable approval by the City Manager. The Operations Manager shall devote substantial time and attention to the operation of the Premises and the Campground and render such services and convenience to the public as are required. The Operations Manager shall be fully acquainted with the operations of the Premises, familiar with the terms and conditions prescribed therefore by this Agreement, and authorized to act in the day-to-day operations thereof. 6.6.2 The City Manager may at any time give Operator written notice to the effect that the conduct or action of a designated employee of Operator is, in the reasonable belief of the City Manager, detrimental to the interest of the public patronizing the Premises. Operator shall transfer or reassign any such employee within a reasonable period of time following notice therefor from the City Manager, and such employee shall not be assigned to any other City facility. 6.6.3 Operator warrants that it fully complies with all laws regarding employment of aliens and others, and that all its employees performing services herein meet the citizenship or alien status requirements contained in federal and state statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-603). Operator shall obtain, from all covered employees performing services herein, all verification and other documentation of employment eligibility status required by federal statutes and regulations as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. Operator shall retain such documentation for all covered employees for the period prescribed by law. Operator shall indemnity, defect, and hold harmless, the City, its agents, officers and employees from employer sanctions and any other liability which may be assessed against Operator or City or both in connection with any alleged violation of federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of persons performing services under this Agreement. 6.6.4 Operator shall file with the City Manager a certificate for each member of the food and beverage staff showing that within the last two (2) years, such person has been examined and has been found to be free of comnnmicablc tuberculosis. "Certificate" means a document signed by the examining physician and surgeon who is licensed under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), Division 2 of the California Business and Professions Code, or La Lamina 01malions Agicemen1061715 111tlal doCX Page 6 a notice from a public health agency or unit of the Tuberculosis Association which indicates freedom from active tuberculosis. 6.7 Minimum Days and ]]ours of Operation and Fees 6.7.1 The Premises shall operate during all days and hours that the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area is open to the public. Operator shall contact the Director no less than once a month to obtain the upcoming month's days and homy of operation. Any changes in days or hours of operations must receive prior approval of the Director. 6.7.2 The Boat Launch shall operate as follows: a. Daily from sunrise to sunset from April 1 st to October 31st each year. b. Friday, Saturday and Sunday from sunrise to sunset from November I st to March 31 st each year. C. Monday through Thursday from sunrise to sunset from November I st to March 31 st each year. d. Subject to consent from the City Manager and compliance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Operator may operate the Boat Launch after sunset. 6.7.3 The hours of service provided by the Operator are set forth in the Schedule of Fees and Hours, Exhibit `B" attached hereto. 6.8 Prices. Operator shall at all times maintain a complete list or schedule of the prices for all fees, charges, goods, rentals, and services, or combinations thereof, supplied to the public on or from the premises. The City Manager hereby reserves the right to review and approve said fees and charges. Prices shall comply with the requirements under any grant agreement with the Department of Boating & Waterways concerning launch fees and such other prices shall be fair and reasonable based upon the following considerations: that the campground and boat operation is intended to serve the needs of the public for the goods and/or services supplied at a fair and reasonable cost; comparability with prices charged for similar goods and/or services supplied in the Riverside Metropolitan Area; and reasonableness of profit margins in view of the cost of providing same in compliance with the obligations assumed in this Agreement. In the event City notifies Operator that prices being charged are not fair and reasonable, Operator shall have the right to confer with the City Manager and justify the prices. Following reasonable conference and consultation thereon, Operator shall make such price adjustments as may be ordered by the City Manager. Operator may appeal the determination of the City Manager to the City Council, whose decision thereon shall be final and conclusive. 6.9 Quality of Goods and Services. Service to the public, with goods, services, and merchandise of a high quality and at reasonable charges, is of prime concern to the City and is considered a part of the consideration for this Agreement. Therefore, Operator agrees to operate IZi hli'U a Opcnnio is Agreement 061715 J mal does Page 7 and conduct its operation in a first-class manner, and comparable to other first-class facilities providing similar activities, programs and services. Where such facilities are provided, Operator shall maintain a high standard of service at least equal to that of similar events and programs conducted on City parks and/or adjacent communities and to those prevailing in such areas for similar products and services, and without discrimination. Operator, following receipt of written notification therefor, shall immediately remove or withdraw from sale of any goods or services which may be found objectionable to the City Manager based on findings that the provision of such goods or services is harmful to the public welfare. 6.10 Utilities. With respect to the Premises, City shall provide and pay for any necessary utilities, including telephone, water and electricity, consumed by Operator in the operation of the Premises. Operator waives any and all claims against City for compensation for loss or damage caused by a defect, deficiency or impairment of any utility system, water system, water supply system, drainage system, waste system, heating or gas system, electrical apparatus or wires serving the Premises. City shall pay for any new connections to the existing utility services necessary for the operation of the Premises, provided, however that Operator shall for any new connection to existing utility services necessary for the operation of the General Store. 6.11 Sanitation. No offensive matter, refuse, or substance constituting an unnecessary, unreasonable or unlawful fire hazard, or material detrimental to the public health, shall be permitted or remain on the Premises and within a distance of fifty (50) feet thereof, and Operator shall prevent any accumulation thereof from occurring. Operator shall furnish all equipment and materials necessary, including trash receptacles of the size, type, color and number required by the City Manager, to maintain the Premises and the area within a distance of fifty (50) feet thereof in a sanitary condition. City shall provide that all refuse is collected no less than once a week by its existing franchise hauler. 6.12 Housekeeping and Maintenance 6.12.1 Housekeeping of Premises. During the term of this Agreement, Operate]- shall peratorshall be responsible at is sole cost and expense, for conducting all Housekeeping of the Premises in order to assure that the Premises is in good and substantial condition, and kept in a clean, safe, wholesome and sanitary condition free of trash, garbage, or obstructions of any kind. 6.12.2 Maintenance and Repair of Premises. During the term of this Agreement, City shall be responsible at is sole cost and expense, for conducting all Maintenance and Repair of the Premises in order to assure that the Premises is maintained in a Reasonable good state of repair and preserve the Premises and the improvements thereon are preserved for an Reasonable useful life. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall have no obligation to maintain or repair the General Store nor any equipment owned by Operator (including rentals equipment such as vessels) related to the operation thereof. 6.123 Default. Either party may cure the default of the other party hereto with respect to the obligations assumed in this Section 6.12, and upon performance thereof shall acquire a right of reimbursement therefrom for the actual costs of same, including, but not limited to, the cost of labor, materials and equipment furnished in the correction thereof, La Laguna Opeimtions Agreement 061715 I'inaI doca Page 8 provided there is prior mutual agreement between the City Manager and Operator upon the nature and scope of the work to be performed and the costs to be incurred thereby. Any demand of City for reimbursement hereunder shall be satisfied by Licensee through a credit against the monthly La Laguna Operating Fee, commencing with the month next succeeding the date of completion of the Housekeeping performed, and for each and every other month of the remaining tent of this Agreement, until a total credit has been provided of the actual costs of cure. Any demand of Licensee for reimbursement hereunder shall be satisfied by City through a credit against the monthly Revenue, commencing with the month next succeeding the date of completion of the Maintenance and Repairs performed, and for each and every other month of the remaining term of this Agreement, until a total credit has been provided of the actual costs of cure. City and Licensee waive all rights to payment on their respective rights to reimbursement for the actual costs of cure of the default of the other with respect to the maintenance obligations assumed herein, except in the manner and amounts heretofore provided. 6.13 Security Devices. City, at its own expense, may provide any legal devices or equipment and the installation thereof, designated for the purpose of protecting the Premises from theft, burglary or vandalism, provided written approval for installation thereof is first obtained from the City Manager. 6.14 Safety. Operator shall immediately correct any unsafe condition of that portion of the Premises designated as the campground and Boat Launch area, as well as any unsafe practices occurring thereon. Operator shall immediately notify City of any unsafe condition at the Boat Launch and correct any unsafe practices occurring thereon. Operator shall obtain emergency medical care for any member of the public who is in need thereof, because of illness or injury occurring on the Premises. Operator shall cooperate fully with City in the investigation of any accidental injury or death occurring on the Premises, including a prompt report thereof to the City Manager. Operator shall cooperate and comply fully with county, state, municipal, federal or any other regulatory agency having jurisdiction thereover, regarding any safety inspections and certifications of any and all Operator's structures, enclosures, vehicles, booths, equipment and rides. 6.15 Trade Fixtures Operator has provided the General Store and may provide storage containers or other temporary minor structures in connection with for the operation of the vessel rentals and other patron services at Premises. Within the last thirty (30) days preceding the termination of this Agreement, Operator shall remove sarne from the Premises, other than for those items of personal property which have been furnished by City or so affixed that their removal therefrom cannot be accomplished without damage to the realty. Should Operator fail to so remove said appliances, furniture, fixtures, equipment, door locks and padlocks within said thirty (30) day period, Operator shall lose all right, title and interest in and thereto, and City may elect to keep same upon the Premises or to sell, remove or demolish same. Operator shall reimburse City for any cost as determined by the City Manager incurred in excess of any consideration received from the sale, removal or demolition thereof. La Laguna Opewimns Agicemenl001715 Final.doex Pabge 9 6.16 Merchandise/Food Products. Operator shall provide and maintain an inventory of merchandise required to meet the Reasonable needs of the public therefor. All food and beverages sold or kept for sale by Operator shall conform to the federal, state and county food Taws, ordinances and regulations in all respects. No adulterated, misbranded or impure articles shall knowingly be sold or kept for sale by Operator and all merchandise kept on hand by Operator shall be stored and handled with Reasonable regard for safety and sanitation. In the event that the City Manager determines that any merchandise does not meet the requirements of this section, the City Manager shall have the right to order the improvement of the quality of any such items kept or offered for sale. The City Manager shall have the right to prohibit the sale or rental of any item of merchandise on finding(s) that the item is reasonably determined to be of inferior quality and/or that the item is detrimental to the public. 6.17 Equipment/Annual Lake Use Pass. All boats and non -powered personal water craft, hereinafter referred to as equipment, offered for rental shall be of a design and make approved by the City Manager prior to use. Equipment offered for rental must be of a design which will fully comply with any and all safety requirements of the State of California, Department of Boating and Waterways and the United States Coast Guard. Life jacl<ets or floatable safety cushions must also be supplied for all persons utilizing unpowered and powered personal water craft. Said floatation devices must meet acceptable safety standards as determined by the appropriate federal and state agencies. Equipment offered for rent shall be numbered in accordance with applicable regulations established by the Department of Motor Vehicles, State of California. Operator shall provide, at all times that boat rental operation is open to the public, a powered boat which shall be available for use by Operator or his employees for emergency purposes in retrieving rental boats or in patrolling the lake to ascertain that rental boats are complying with all safety regulations. Operator shall include a disclaimer in rental agreement that the City is not responsible to tow rental boats if they run out of gas, mechanical failure or cause an accident. Each rental vessel shall display a City Commercial Lake Use Pass sticker at all times. The sticker shall be affixed to the vessel within four inches of the vessel's C.F. uUmbers on the port side. The Commercial Lake Use Pass shall be valid for the calendar year (.January 1 through December 31). The Commercial Lake Use Pass stickers for Operator's rental vessels shall be provided to Operator at no cost to Operator in recognition that the General Store Concession fee is applicable to the rental of vessels by Operator. 6.18 Programmed Events. Operator shall not promote or sponsor private or public events requiring the use of any other areas of the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area other than the Premises unless authorized by the City Manager. However, this provision shall not prohibit Operator from generally advertising or encouraging public use of Lake Elsinore Recreation Area. 6.19 Camping 6.19.1 Except as provided herein, under no circumstances shall a campsite be rented to any individual, entity or organization a period of more fourteen (14 ) consecutive days in any twenty-one (2 1) day period. Ln Laguna Opcmlions Agreement 06171) Final docx Page 10 6.19.2 Exception for Off-season Camping. City and Operator recognize that following the Labor Day weekend and prior to the Memorial Day weekend each year, utilization of the Lance Elsinore Recreation Area is substantially reduced. In order to economize operations at reduced levels and allow for completion of deferred maintenance to restroom facilities, Operator shall be allowed to restrict camping on the Premises to fully self-contained recreational vehicles for long-term camping as determined by Operator. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City and Operator agree that no occupancy of the Premises shall be allowed for a period of six (6) months or more that would result in any person becoming a "resident' of the Premises as that term is defined by Civil Code section 799.31, and as it may be subsequently amended. Moreover, the parties agree that Operator shall conduct its operations as to prevent establishment of a mobile home park on the Premises. 6.20 Advertising and Promotional Materials. Operator shall not promulgate nor cause to be distributed any advertising, or promotional materials unless prior approval thereof is obtained from City Manager. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed and shall be deemed to be given if no objection is made within thirty (30) days following the request for approval. Such materials include, but are not limited to: advertising in newspapers, flyers, newsletters, magazines and trade journals, and radio and/or television commercials. 6.21 Credit Promotional Materials. Operator agrees that any advertising or promotional materials promulgated by Operator shall include the words "Lake Elsinore" as part of the name or identification of the Premises. 7. TRANSFERS 7.1 Operator shall not, without written consent of the City Manager, transfer, assign, sublicense, hypothecate or mortgage this Agreement. Any attempted transfer, assignment, sublicense, hypothecation or mortgage without the written consent of the City Manager shall be null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 7.2 Each and all of the provisions, agreements, terms, covenants and conditions herein contained to be performed by Operator shall be binding upon any transferee thereof. 7.3 The license shall not be transferable by testamentary disposition or the state laws of intestate succession, as the rights, privileges, and use conferred by this Agreement shall terminate prior to the date for expiration thereof in the event of the death of Operator occurring within the term herein provided. Additionally, neither this Agreement nor any interest therein shall be transferable in proceedings in attachment or execution against Operator, or in voluntary or involuntary proceedings in bankruptcy or insolvency or receivership taken by or against Operator, or by any process or Maw including proceedings under Chapter X or XI of the Bankruptcy Act. 7.4 Shareholders and/or partners of Operator may transfer, sell, exchange, assign or divest themselves of any interest they may have therein. However, in the event any such sale, transfer, exchange, assignment or divestment is affected in such a way as to give majority control of Operator to any persons, corporation, partnership or legal entity other than the majority La Laguna 01malmns Agreement 061715 FInaI(Io"N Page I I controlling interest therein at the time of the execution of this Agreement, the City Manager's approval thereof shall be required. Consent to any such transfer shall be refused if the City Manager finds that the transferee is lacking in experience and/or financial ability to operate the Premises. 7.5 The prohibition herein contained shall not be applicable with respect to transfers of this Agreement arising from the exercise of a power of sale or judicial foreclosure pursuant to the terms and conditions of a hypothecation or mortgage previously approved by the City Manager. 7.6 In the event Operator shall request the prior written consent of City Manager to give, assign, transfer or grant control of this Agreement, and City Manager gives written consent to the assignment, a transfer fee equal to two percent (2%) of the Gross Sales Price shall be paid to City. Said sum shall be payable to City in full either within thirty (30) days after said consent is given or prior to the close of any escrow, whichever occurs first. Prior to City Manager's consent to such assignment, the assignor shall first deliver to assignee a written schedule of all sums due and owing to City firom the assignor with such schedule in a form subject to the approval of the City Manager in all respects, and second, shall deliver to City Manager, as part of the acceptance of the assignment, a written acknowledgment by the assignee that the assignee (a) affirms the sums due and owing to City and (b) accepts responsibility for payment of such sums directly to City. Exempted from said transfer fee shall be the following: 7.6.1 A transfer of an undivided interest in the license between or among co- workers or affiliated entities which results in a change in method of holding title but does not result in a change to the proportional interests held by the co-owners or affiliated entities prior to the transfer; 7.6.2 An assignment which serves as security for the repayment of a loan from any lender but which does not entitle the assignee to an immediate right to use, occupy, possess or receive the rents or profits from the operation of the Premises for so long as the assignor makes the required periodic payments and complies with other provisions of the loan; 7.6.3 A transfer of title of the license to a lender purchaser at the foreclosure sale under a deed of trust on the property or by assignment to the lender or its nominee in lieu of foreclosure; 7.6.4 Such other assignment for which the City Manager determines that the ownership interests in the license have remained unchanged, such as a change in the legal or Fictitious name of the Operator without any other change in the equity, in beneficial use of, or legal title to the license as an asset, or the income produced thereby. The City Manager's decision in such cases shall be appealable to the City Council within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of the City Manager's decision. Any such appeal request shall be accompanied by a Certificate of Deposit filed with City Manager in the full amount of the transfer fee; the Certificate of Deposit shall be payable to City, and the interest thereon shall accumulate, but the principal sum and interest shall remain the property of Operator in the event the City Manager's decision is reversed. I ri age I2 lagunu Operations'A 061715 Final doex P 8. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION 8.1 Operator shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney fees incurred by City, court costs, interest, defense costs including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation arising out of or in any way attributable in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement, except as may be provided in Sections 8.2 and 8.3. "Performance of this Agreement" includes responsibility for water related activities within the Boat Launch area used by invitees or any others. The Boat Launch area is generally that area of the Premises designated for the launching and mooring of any water craft and any improvements on the Premises for such purposes. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by Operator as they are incurred by the City. 8.2 Without affecting the rights of City under any provisions of this Agreement or this section, notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, Operator shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for liability attributable to the sole fault of City, provided such sole fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. Injury or death during water activities within the boat launch area is not the fault of City. This exception will apply only in instances where the City is shown to have been at fault to the percentage of the liability of the City. In those instances, the obligation of Operator will be all-inclusive and City will be indemnified for all liability incurred, even though a percentage of the liability is attributable to conduct of the City. 8.3 Without affecting the riglits of City under any provisions of this Agreement or this section, notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, Operator shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for liability attributable to water related activities occurring at or beyond the actual waterline of Lake Elsinore along the public beach area (such public beach area being a separate area from the boat launch area referenced in Section 8.1) and the main body of Lake Elsinore beyond the public beach and boat launch areas, unless such liability is the sole fault of Operator, provided such sole fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. This exception will apply only in instances where the Operator is shown to have been solely at fault and not in instances where the City is percentage of the liability involved. 8.4 The obligations of Operator Under this or any other provision of this Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any workers' compensation act or similar act. Operator expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or Taws as to City, its employees and officials. 8.5 Operator agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -operator, sub -tier contractor or any other person or entity involved on behalf of Operator in the performance or subject matter of this Agreement. In the event Operator fails to obtain such indemnity r., Lagunu Ocial ms Agreement 00 171 5 FinaI docx Page 13 obligations from others as required here, Operator agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms ofthis section. 8.6 Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Operator and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. 8.7 Without affecting the rights of City under any provisions of this Agreement or this Section 8, Operator has the right, in its sole discretion, to tender the defense for any and all claims under which Operator is obligated to indemnify City to the Operator's insurance carrier under the provisions of this Section 8, including but not limited to, selecting legal counsel. 9. INSURANCE 9.1 Without limiting Operator's indemnification of City, Operator shall provide and maintain at its own expense during the tcrm of this Agreement the hereinafter listed prograrn(s) of insurance covering its operations hereunder. Such insurance shall be provided by an insurer(s) satisfactory to City's Risk Manager and certificates or other evidence of insurance and certified copy(ies) of additional insured endorsement(s) shall be delivered to the City Manager on or before the Commencement Date. 9.2 Operator, at Operator's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies: a. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Operator shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Operator shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Operator for City. In the event that Operator is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Operator shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. b. Commercial General Liabilitv Covera. Operator shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million dollars ($1000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 1'f a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. La laguna Operations Agreement 001715 hmaI Boca Page 14 Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. C. Automobile Liability Coverage. Operator shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Operator arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code I ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. d. Watercraft Liability. In the event that Commercial General Liability Coverage policy provided by Operator pursuant to Section 9.2,b. does excludes coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired watercraft vehicles, Operator shall maintain separate Watercraft Liability coverage endorsed for all owned, non -owned, and hired watercraft vehicles with a combined single limit of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per occurrence. 9.3. Endorsements. Each general commercial liability, automobile liability insurance and watcreraft liability policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed in substantially the following form: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The irnsurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, I .i Laguna Opemlions Agreement 00171.51 inal docx Page 15 canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. 9.2 Operator's performance under this Agreement shall not commence until Operator has complied with the aforementioned insurance requirements. Operator's operations, whether in whole or in part, shall be subject to suspension by the City Manager during any period that Operator fails to maintain said policies in full force and effect. 9.3 Failure on the part of the Operator to provide or maintain required programs of insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract upon which City may immediately terminate this Agreement. 9.4 No cancellation provision in any insurance policy shall be construed in derogation Of the continuous dirty of Operator to furnish insurance during the term of this Agreement. At least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, a signed and complete certificate Of insurance, with all endorsements required herein, showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended, shall be filed with City Manager. 10. DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION 10.1 if dining the term of this Agreement, the buildings or improvements or such fixtures or equipment, on, below, above or appurtenant to the Premises and/or the Boat Launch at the commencement of the term or thereafter erected, installed or placed thereon or therein shall be destroyed or damaged in whole or in part by fire or any other cause, Operator shall give the City Manager immediate notice thereof. Operator shall immediately secure the area to prevent ilnjuy, vandalism, and further damage to persons, improvements, and t contents thereof. City and Operator shall meet and confer to reach a mutually agreeable method and cost allocation to promptly restore same to the condition existing immediately prior to such occurrence. If such agreement is not reach in view of the damage sustained and availability of finds with which to rebuild, either party may terminate this Agreement. 11. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 11.1 In the event City constructs or causes to be constructed new facilities and/or improvements for the licensed operations at the Premises, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, except that the payments to be made by Operator shall be abated and/or other relief afforded to the extent that the City Manager may determine the construction interferes with the authorized operations, provided a claim therefor is filed with the City Manager within one hundred (100) days of commencement of construction. 11.2 Operator agrees to cooperate with City in the event the construction affects the Premises by vacating and removing therel-rom all items of inventory, trade fixtures, equipment and furnishings for such periods as are required by the construction of the new facilities. Operator further agrees to cooperate in the dctermination of the abatement and/or other relief to be provided by furnishing all information requested relative to the operation and permitting examination and audit of all accounting records kept in connection with the conduct thereof. La Laguna Operations Agreement 06171 Final locx Page 16 11.3 Following completion of any new facility and or improvement, Operator shall resume its operations therefrom within thirty (30) days of written notice from the City Manager. 11.4 The aforementioned provisions of this section shall also be applicable in the event of performance of work at Lalce Elsinore Recreation Area that requires a partial or total closure thereof, except that the abatement and/or other relief to be provided shall be based upon the extent the City Manager may determine that the reduction in the public's use due to the partial or total closure thereof, has affected the Operator's operations. 11.5 Operator agrees to accept the remedy heretofore provided in the event of construction upon the Premises and/or Lake Elsinore Recreation Area and hereby waives any and all additional rights and remedies for relief or compensation that are presently available or may be made available hereafter under the laws and statutes of this state. 12. EASEMENTS AND USE OF BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY 12.1 City reserves the right to establish, grant or utilize easements or rights of way over, under, along and across the Premises for utilities and/or public access provided that City shall exercise such rights in a manner as will avoid any substantial interference with the operations to be conducted hereunder. Should the establishment of such easements permanently deprive Operator of the use of a portion of the licensed operations, an abatement of payments shall be provided in an amount proportional to the total area in the before and after conditions. Operator also agrees to allow the City, the Lake Elsinore Police Department, the Riverside County Sheriffs Department and any other public agency providing public safety to enter onto the Premises and utilize the Boat Launch and parking facilities without charge. 13. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS 13.1 The property interest conveyed herein may be subject to real property taxation and/or assessment thereon, and in the event thereof, Operator shall pay before delinquency all lawful taxes, including but not limited to possessory interest taxes, assessments, fees or charges which at any time may be levied by the State, County, City or any other tax or assessment - levying body upon the Premises and any improvements located thereon. 13.2 Operator shall also pay all taxes, assessments, fees and charges on goods, merchandise, fixtures, appliances and equipment owned or used therein. 14. NON-DISCRIMINATION 14.1 Operator hereby certifies and agrees that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title XI of the Education Amendments of 1972, where applicable, and Title 43, part 17 ofthe Code of Federal Regulations Subparts A and B, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, to the end that no persons shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, Lo Laguna Operations Agreement 001715 FinaI doev Page 17 political affiliation, marital status, sex, age or disability, be subject to discrimination under the privileges and use granted by this Agreement or under any project, program or activity supported by this Agreement. 142 Operator certifies and agrees that all persons employed thereby, are and shall be treated equally without regard to or because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, marital status, or disability, and in compliance with all federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination in employment, including, but not limited to, the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, the Cartwright Act, and the State Fair Employment Practices Act. 14.3 Operator certifies and agrees that subcontractors, bidders and vendors thereof are and shall be selected without regard to or because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, marital status, or disability. 14.4 All employment records shall be open for inspection and re -inspection at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement for the purpose of verifying the practice of- non-discrimination fnon-discrimination by Operator in the areas heretofore described. 14.5 If City finds that any of the above provisions have been violated, the same shall Constitute a material breach of contract upon which City may determine to cancel, terminate, or suspend this Agreement. City reserves the right to determine independently that the non- discrimination provisions of this Agreement have been violated. ht addition, a determination by the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that the Operator has violated state or federal non-discrimination laws or regulations shall constitute a finding by City that Operator has violated the non-discrimination provisions of this Agreement. 14.6 The parties agree that in the event Operator violates the non-discrimination provisions contained herein, City shall, at its option, be entitled to a sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200) pursuant to California Civil Code 1671 as liquidated damages in lieu of canceling, terminating or suspending this Agreement. Operator further agrees that Two Hundred Dollars ($200) is a reasonable sum under all of the circumstance existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement. 15. ARBITRATION 15.1 Any controversy arising under paragraph 4.2 of Section 4 - (Payment); and paragraph 6.8 - (Prices) of Section 6 - (Operating Responsibilities) shall be submitted to arbitration by a single arbitrator under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, as the rules now exist or may be subsequently amended, except as hereinafter modified; the locale for the arbitration shall be within the County of Riverside; the sole issue(s) for determination shall be the specific issue(s) submitted; and the expenses subject to assessment by the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the parties. Ln Laguna Operxtfons Agreement 061715 rimLdoex Page 18 15.1.1 The sole issue for determination of a controversy submitted under paragraph 4.2 shall be the fair rental value for this Agreement based upon a consideration of the factors specified in said paragraph. 15.1.2 The sole issue for determination of a controversy submitted under paragraph 6.8 shall be the price(s) charged for the good(s) or service(s) in dispute based upon a consideration of the factors specified in said paragraph. 15.2 City and Operator acknowledge and agree that paragraph 15.1 constitutes an enforceable agreement to submit the controversy to arbitration under the enforcement provisions of the California Arbitration Act, as the law now exists or may be subsequently amended. 16. RESERVED 17. CANCELLATION 17.1 This Agreement may be terminated without cause by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. 17.2 Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the events of default hereinafter described, this Agreement shall be subject to cancellation. As a condition precedent thereto, the City Manager shall give Operator ten (10) days notice by registered or certified mail of the date set for cancellation thereof; the grounds therefore; and that an opportunity to be heard thereon will be afforded on or before said date, if request is made therefor. 17.3 Upon cancellation, City shall have the right to take possession of the Premises and the Campground, including all improvements, equipment, and inventory located thereon, and use same for the purpose of satisfying and/or mitigating all damages arising from a breach of this Agreement. 17.4 Action by City to effectuate a cancellation and forfeiture of possession shall be without prejudice to the exercise of any other rights provided herein or by law to remedy a breach of this Agreement. 17.5 Any trustee, beneficiary, mortgagee or lender (hereinafter "Lender") under a hypothecation or mortgage previously approved by the City Manager shalt have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to undertake any and all action that may be required in order to prevent a cancellation of this Agreement and a forfeiture of the license. Accordingly, the City Manager shall send a copy of any intended cancellation of this Agreement to any such Lender whose security would be affected thereby, provided that such Lender shall have previously registered with the City Manager by written notice specifying the name and address of said Lender; and upon request thereof for postponement, extend the date set therefor by such time as the City Manager finds reasonable in order to allow said parties to correct the grounds therefor or to provide a new Operator under a power of sale or foreclosure contained in the hypothecation or mortgage, who upon transfer thereto shall become responsible for the correction thereof within such time as may be allowed by the City Manager. La I opmai Opera ons Agreement 001715 FInnrd(ICN Page 19 18. EVENTS OP DEFAULT The following shall constitute an event of default under this Agreement: 18.1 The unauthorized abandonment, vacation or discontinuance of operations for more than twenty-four (24) consecutive howl. 18.2 The failure of Operator to punctually pay or make the payments required herein when due, where the delinquency continues beyond ten (10) days following written notice for payment thereof. 18.3 The failure of Operator to operate in the manner required by this Agreement, where such failure continues for more than ten (10) days after written notice from the City Manager to correct the condition. 18.4 The failure to maintain the Premises and the iruprovements constructed thereon in the state of repair required herein, and in a clean, sanitary, safe and satisfactory condition, where such failure continues for more than ten (10) days after written notice from the City Manager to correct the condition. 18.5 The failure of Operator to keep, perform and observe all of the other promises, covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in this Agreement, where such failure continues for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from the City Manager for correction thereof, provided that where fulfillment of such obligation requires activity over a period of time and Operator shall have commenced to perform whatever may be required to cure the particular default within ten (10) days after such notice and continues such performance diligently, said time limit may be waived in the manner and to the extent allowed by the City Manager. 18.6 The filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy by Operator; the adjudication of Operator as a banla•upt; the appointment of any receiver of Operator's assets; the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, a petition or answer seeking an arrangement for the reorganization of Operator under any Federal Reorganization Act, including petitions or answers under Chapter X1 of the Bankruptcy Act; the occurrence of any act which operates to deprive Operator permanently of the rights, powers and privileges necessary for the property conduct and operation of the Premises, the levy of any attachment or execution which substantially interferes with Operator's operations under this Agreement and which attachment or execution is not vacated, dismissed, stayed or set aside within a period ol'sixty (60) days. 18.7 Determination by the City, the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission, or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of discrimination having been practiced by Operator in violation of state and/or federal laws thereon. 18.8 Failure of Operator to keep, perform and observe all other promises, covenants, conditions and agreements set forth herein. 1_a Lnguna Openllions Apeemen10017151'inal dne\ Page 20 19. IMPROPER CONSIDERATION City may, by written notice to Operator, immediately terminate the right of Operator to proceed under this Agreement if it is found that consideration, in any form, was offered or given by Operator, either directly or through an intermediary, to ally City officer, employee or agent with the intent of securing the Agreement or securing favorable treatment with respect to the award, amendment or extension of the Agreement or the making of any determinations with respect to the Operator's performance pursuant to the Agreement in the event of such termination. City shall be entitled to pursue the same remedies against Operator as it could pursue in the event of default by the Operator. Operator shall immediately report any attempt by a City officer or employee to solicit such improper consideration. The report shall be made to the City Manager. 20. 'TERMINATION UPON TRANSFER OF TITLE OR PARK CLOSURE 20.1 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in the event the City transfers its interest in the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area (including the Premises) to a governmental agency (assignee), the City reserves the right to: terminate this Agreement; or provided there is a consent by an assignee, assign the City's interest in this Agreement to said assignee. City shall provide the Operator with notice of termination or assignment of this Agreement pursuant to this provision. 20.2 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in the event the City closes the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area, this Agreement shall be terminated upon the effective date of such closure. Upon the effective date of park closure. Operator shall immediately cease its operations, and within fifteen (15) days therefrom remove all items of its personal property, equipment, and inventory. City shall provide advance notice to the Operator of such park closure. 21. OPERATOR'S NON-COMPLIANCE AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES 21.1 In the event the City Manager determines that there are deficiencies in Operator's operations authorized and required herein, the City Manager will provide, as specified herein in the section of this Agreement entitled Events of Default, a written notice to the Operator to correct said deficiencies within specified time frames. 25.2 ]n the event that Operator fails to correct the deficiencies within the prescribed time frames the City Manager may, at his/her option: (1) exercise its rights wider the Section hereinafter entitled Right of Entry and/or (2) assess liquidated damages. The parties agree that it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to fix the extent of actual damages resulting from the failure of the Operator to comply with the obligations for operations herein authorized and required. The parties hereby agree that Under the current circumstances a reasonable estimate of such damage is $250.00 per day for each day of the period of time that the deficiencies exist, and that Operator shall be liable to City for liquidated damages in said amount. I Laguna Operations Agmement 001715 1�mal docx Page 21 22. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 22.1 Any documents submitted by Operator; all information obtained in connection with the City's right to audit and inspect Operator's documents, books, and accounting records Pursuant to Section 5.3 (Accounting Records) of this Agreement become the exclusive property of the City. All such documents become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records. Exceptions will be those elements in the California Government Code Section 6250 et sect. (Public Records Act) and which are marked "trade secret", "confidential", or "proprietary". The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked, if disclosure is required by law, or by an order of court of competent jurisdiction. 22.2 In the event the City is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the aforementioned documents, information, books, records, and/or contents of a proposal marked "trade secret", "confidential", or "proprietary", the Operator agrees to defend and indemnify the City from all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in any action or liability arising under the Public Records Act. 23. WAIVER 23.1 Any waiver by City of any breach of any one or more of the covenants, conditions, terms and agreements herein contained shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other covenant, condition, term or agreement herein contained, nor shall failure on the part of City to require exact, full and complete compliance with any of the covenants, conditions, terms or agreements herein contained be construed as in any manner changing the terms of this Agreement or estopping City from enforcing the full provisions thereof. 23.2 No delay, failure, or omission of City to re-enter the Premises, or to exercise any right, power, privilege or option, arising from any default, nor any subsequent acceptance of payments then or thereafter accrued shall impair any such right, power, privilege or option, or be construed as a waiver of or acquiescence in Such default or as a relinquishment of any right. 23.3 No notice to Operator shall be required to restore or revive "time of the essence" after the waiver by City of any default. 23.4 No option, right, power, remedy or privilege of City shall be construed as being exhausted by the exercise thereof in one or more instances. The rights, powers, options and remedies given City by this Agreement shall be cumulative. 24. SURRENDER 24.1 Upon expiration of the term hereof, or cancellation thereof as herein provided. Operator shall peaceably vacate the Premises and any and all improvements located thereon and deliver up the same to City in a reasonably good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, hit agumi Operalions Agreement 061715 Final cbcx Page 22 subject to the right of City to demand removal thereof to the extent that Section 2.6 hereinbefore may be applicable thereto. 24.2 Upon expiration of the term, Operator shall execute and deliver to City within thirty (30) days after service of written demand, a good and sufficient quitclaim deed of the Operator's interest in this Agreement and the Premises. Should Operator fail or refuse to deliver to City a quitclaim deed as aforesaid, a written notice by City reciting the failure of the Operator to execute and deliver the quitclaim deed shall, after ten (10) days from the date of recordation of the notice, be conclusive evidence against Operator and all persons claiming under Operator, of the termination of this Agreement. 25. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 25.1 The following words as used herein shall be construed to have the following meaning, unless otherwise apparent from the context in which they are used: "Boat launch" means the boat launch at the La Laguna Resort. "Campground and Boat Launch Operations Revenues" means Revenues collected by the Operator related to the campground and boat launch operations (and excluding General Store Gross Receipts). "City" means the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation. "City Manager" means the City Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore or his/her designee. "Commencement Date" means .lune 1, 2015. "Designated Holidays" means Memorial Day, July 4th (unless July 4th falls on a Saturday in which case Friday, July 3rd shall be treated as a Designated Holiday, or unless July 4th falls on a Sunday in which case July 5th shall be treated as a Designated Holiday), and Labor Day. "General Store" means the temporary building located at the Premises in which Operator sells various merchandise including food, beverages, recreation supplies along with recreational rentals, including boats, kayaks and other watercraft. "General Store Gross Receipts" means Gross Receipts generated from the operating the General Store (which includes rental of boats, kayaks and other watercraft). "Gross Receipts" means: a. The term "gross receipts" as used in this Agreement, is defined to be all money, cash receipts, assets, property or other things of value, including but not limited to gross charges, sales, rentals, fees and commissions made or earned by Operator and/or all the assignees, sub -operators, permittees or concessionaires thereof, whether collected or accrued Lu kieuna Opemlions Apecment 061715 Final docx Page 23 from any business, use or occupation, or any combination thereof, originating, transacted or performed in whole or in part, at the General Store, including but not limited to boat rentals, recreational equipment rental, the rendering or supplying of services and the sale of goods, wares or merchandise. b There shall be no deduction from gross receipts for any overhead or cost or expense of operations, such as, but without limitation to salaries, wages, costs of goods, interest, debt amortization, credit, collection costs, discount from credit card operations, insurance and taxes. Bona fide bad debts actually incurred by Operator or its sub -operators, assignees, concessionaires and permittees may be deducted from gross receipts. There shall, however, be no deduction for bad debts based on past experience or transfers to a bad debt reserve. Subsequent collection of bad debts previously not reported as gross receipts shall be included in gross receipts at the time they are collected. C. Gross receipts reported by Operator and its sub -operators, assignees, Operators, concessionaires and permittees, must include the full usual charges for any services, goods, rentals or facilities provided by Operator or its sub -operators, assignees, concessionaires or permittees. Gross receipts shall not include direct taxes imposed upon the consumer and collected therefrom by Operator such as, but not limited to, retail sales taxes, excise taxes, or related direct taxes, which are direct taxes paid periodically by Operator to a governmental agency accompanied by a tax return statement and, further, shall not include the sale or resale of City Lake Use Passes purchased from the City. d. The City Manager, consistent with recognized and accepted business and accounting practices may further interpret the term "gross receipts" as used in this Agreement. "Gross Sales Price" means the total consideration resulting from the transfer of Operator's interest in the operations of the Premises, or portion thereof, determined by the total cash payments and the market value of all non-cash consideration, including, but not limited to, stocks, bonds, deferred payments, secured and unsecured notes, and forbearances regarding claims and judgments. "I lousekeeping" means activities relating to keeping the Premises clean, neat, orderly and includes but not limited to, cleaning of public restrooms and showers (excluding supplies which shall be provided by City), trash pickup and consolidating garbage into centralized dumpsters, use of minor to medium equipment for clean-up (such as use of a small tractor to remove rubbish in the yard area), campsite preparation, irrigating and sprinkler repairs, minor repairs/replacement to campground equipment (picnic tables, grills and fire rings), pest inspection and control, landscape mowing and edging, shrub trimming and non-recurring removal of hanging tree limbs, raking, sweeping, vacuuming, wiping, washing, hosing, and other general care and cleaning of interior and exterior floors, walls, ceilings, doors, windows, facility fixtures, and all adjacent grounds and walks. "La Laguna Operating Fee" means the weekly fee paid by the City to Operator for the reasonable cost incurred by Operator related to Operator's operational responsibilities exclusive Lai Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 FinaI docs Page 24 of the General Store, as set forth in Exhibit "B", for the Initial Term and the Extension Term (if exercised). "Maintenance and Repairs" means all repairs and preservation work that is necessary to maintain the Premises in a Reasonable good state of repair, including: fire clearance around premises: tree trimming and removal: repair of broken doors, windows, plumbing and electrical fixtures, major repairs/replacement of campground equipment (picnic tables, grills and fire rings), and windows, vandalism, painting, sewer lines, asphalt patching, water lines or valves, roofing, fences, septic tanks, public restroom and shower supplies, and such other maintenance that is not Housekeeping. "Operational Year" means each one-year period of time which commences on June I and ends on May 31 throughout the Initial Term and the Extension Term, if exercised, of this Agreement. "Operator" means Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc., a California corporation, dba William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental. "Premises" means the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A." "Reasonable" and variations thereof means what is commercially reasonable under reasonably anticipated circumstances. "Revenues" means: a. The term "revenues" as used in this Agreement, is defined to be all money, cash receipts, assets, property or other things of value, including but not limited to gross charges, sales, rentals, fees and collected by Operator and/or all the assignees, sub -operators, permittees or concessionaires thereof, related to the recreational use of the Premises by the public, including but not limited to, boat launch fees, lake Day Use Passes, premises entry/parking fees for beach/day-use area patron, campground reservation deposits and rental fees, campsite related charges, storage fees, any other access/use fees, and all other City imposed foes and charges. b Operator may deduct from revenues Lake Day Use Passes and any other required acquired access passes purchased in advance from the City. There shall be no deduction from revenues for any overhead or cost or expense of operations, such as, but without limitation to salaries, wages, costs of goods, interest, debt amortization, credit, collection costs, discount from credit card operations, insurance and taxes. C. Revenues reported by Operator and its sub -operators, assignees, Operators, concessionaires and permittees, must include the full usual charges for any services, goods, rentals or facilities provided by Operator or its sub -operators, assignees, concessionaires or permittees. Revenues shall not include direct taxes imposed upon the consumer and collected therefrom by Operator such as, but not limited to, retail sales taxes, excise taxes, or related direct taxes, which are direct taxes paid periodically by Operator to a governmental agency La Lagumi Operations Agcement 061715 Final doex Page 25 accompanied by a tax return statement and, further, shall not include the sale or resale of City Lake Use Passes purchased from the City. d. The City Manager, consistent with recognized and accepted business and accounting practices may further interpret the term "revenues" as used in this Agreement. "Sub -operators" means any lease, license, permit, concession or other interest in the Premises which is granted by Operator to a third party. 25.2 This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the rules which govern the interpretation of contracts, as prescribed in Part 2 of Division 3 of the California Civil Code, commencing with Section 1635. 25.3 The headings herein contained are for convenience and reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision thereof. 26. RIGHT OF ENTRY 26.1 Any officers and/or authorized employees of the City may enter upon the Premises at any and all reasonable times for the purpose of determining whether or not Operator is complying with the terms and conditions hereof, or for any other purpose incidental to the rights of the City. Additionally, City has the right to use the Boat Launch during non-operating howl for special events, such as boat parades, at no cost to the City or the public. 26.2 In the event of an unauthorized abandonment, vacation or discontinuance of operations for a period in excess of twenty-four (24) hours, Operator hereby irrevocably appoints City as an agent for continuing operation of the license granted herein, and in connection therewith authorizes the officers and employees thereof to (1) take possession of the such licensed area, including all improvements, equipment and inventory thereon; (2) remove any and all persons or property on said area and place any such property in stooge for the account of and at the expense of Operator (3) sublease or sublicense the Premises; and (4) after payment of all expenses of such subleasing or sublicensing, apply all payments realized therefrom to the satisfaction and/or mitigation of all damages arising from Operator's breach of this Agreement. Entry by the officers and employees of City upon any licensed arca for the purpose of exercising the authority conferred hereon as agent of Operator shall be without prejudice to the exercise of any other rights provided herein or by law to remedy a breach of this Agreement. 26.3 No re-entry or taking of the any licensed area by City pursuant to paragraph 30? of this section shall be construed as an election to terminate this Agreement unless a written notice of such intention be given to Operator or unless the termination thereof be decreed by a court of competentjurisdiction. 27. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR This Agreement is by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Operator and is not intended and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, I .i 1 ngunn Operations iApccment 001715 1 final docs Page 26 Partnership, joint venture or association, as between City and Operator. Operator understands and agrees that all persons furnishing services on behalf of Operator pursuant to this Agreement are, for purposes of Workers Compensation Liability, employees solely of Operator and not of City. Operator shall bear the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers' Compensation benefits to any person for injuries arising from or connected with services on behalf of Operator pursuant to this Agreement. 28. CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT AND AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT 28.1 The City Manager shall be responsible for the enforcement of this Agreement on behalf of City and shall be assisted therein by those officers and employees of City having duties in connection with the administration thereof. 28.2 This document may be modified only by further written agreement between the parties. Any such modification shall not be effective unless and until executed by Operator and in the case of City, until approved by the City Manager. 29. CITY'S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The City or its agent will evaluate Licensor's performance under this Agreement at such reasonable intervals as determined by City. Such evaluation will include assessing Operator's compliance with all contract terms and performance standards. Operator deficiencies which City determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the agreement in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the City Council. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the City and Operator. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, City may terminate this Agreement or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. 30. NOTICES Any notice required to be given under the terms of this Agreement or any law applicable thereto may be: (1) delivered by personal service; or (2) placed in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, return receipt requested, addressed to the person on whorn it is to be served, and deposited in a post office, mailbox, sub -post office, substation or mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service. The address to be used for any notice served by mail upon Operator shall be 198 S. Nebraska Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 or such other place as may hereafter be designated in writing to the City Manager by Operator. The address to be used for any notice served by mail upon the City shall be City of Lake Elsinore, Attention: City Manager, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, or such other place as may hereafter be designated in writing to Operator by the City Manager. Service by mail shall be deemed complete upon deposit in the above mentioned manner. 32. SEVERABILITY La Laguna Operelions Agreement 061715 final docx Page 27 If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. 33. ENTIRE AGREEMENT Accordingly, the Agreement and the Exhibit(s) attached hereto, constitute the entire agreement between City and Operator for the uses granted herein. All other agreements, promises and representations with respect thereto, other than contained herein, are expressly revoked, as it has been the intention of the parties to provide for a complete integration within the provisions of this document, and the Exhibit(s) attached hereto, the terms, conditions, promises and covenants relating to the operation of the Premises and to be used in the conduct thereof. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision of this Agreement shall not render the other provisions thereof unenforceable, invalid or illegal. 34. AUTHORIZA'riON WARRANTY Operator represents and warrants that the signatory to this Agreement is fully authorized to obligate Operator hereunder and that all corporate acts necessary to the completion of this Agreement have been accomplished. la Laguna Opemlions Agi'cemem 001715 Final.doex Page 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. WILLIAMS BAIT & TACKLE, INC., a California corporation, doing business as WILLIAMS BAIT, TACKLE AND BOAT RENTAL DATED: , 2015 By: William Johnson, President CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation DATED: , 2015 by: Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney La Laguna Opemmons Agrccmen1 06 171 i 1'ina Aocx Page 29 EXHIBIT "A" PREMISES MAP EXHIBIT `°B" SCnEDULE OF FEES AND HOURS During the months of June through October the following services will be provided from the hours of 6:00 am until 8:00 p.m.: Management services Weekly Supervision of Gatehouse and Grounds Staff 35 hrs Grounds and Gatehouse Staff 210 hrs Weekly Billing $6,717.00 During the months of November through March the following services will be provided from the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.: Management services Weekly Supervision of Gatehouse and GPOLInds Staff 30 hrs Grounds and Gatehouse Staff 110 hrs Weekly Billing $3,657.00 During the months of April and May the following services will be provided 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.: Management services Weekly Supervision of Gatehouse and Grounds Staff 35 hrs Grounds and Gatehouse Staff 120 hrs Weekly Billing $3,733.00 Billing rate is subject to change based on applicable changes to federal, state and local employment Taws. Increased hours of service will be available on written request from the City of Lake Elsinore. Increased fees will be based upon a percentage of additional hours of service. Week or Weekly means Monday through Sunday. City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 6s wwvd.lake-elsinore org ro "' Text File File Number: ID# 14-652 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 13) City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 Cl"t"Y C) I- r ---------- LAKE ----- LAKE 0,LSII`ORE i DREAM E,YTRE,M REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: June 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 & Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 — A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements. APPLICANT: Peter M. Olah, Paradigm Engineering Group, 427 E. Seventeenth St. #261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005- 01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 3. Approve and Introduce by title only and waive further reading of Ordinance No. 2015 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 June 23, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Background On April 21, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed Specific Plan Amendment 2014- 02 and Residential Design Review 2014-07 and provided comments and direction to staff on the proposed project. The item was continued to May 5, 2015 due to the need to complete SB 18 Native American consultation and to finalize the environmental document. On May 5, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2014-02 and Residential Design Review (RDR) No. 2014-07 to the City Council. Proiect Description Previously Approved Project On August 15, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09). On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications. The previously approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 2005- 01) was an infill residential project on an approximately twenty (20) acre site. The approved project featured 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each. A community recreation facility and recreational vehicle storage area was also identified. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 The proposed project makes the following changes to Specific Plan No. 2005-01: • Updates General Plan Designation and consistency to reflect the updates to the General Plan that were approved subsequently to the approval of the project. • Updates technical studies to include the most recent information. • Updates the site planning to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the architectural guidelines to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the specific development standards to account for the modified residential product. • Updates the fence and wall plan to reflect the modified residential product. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 June 23, 2015 Page 3 of 6 Adds additional details for the provided community amenities that were not previously included. This specifically deals with the park area and the addition of the play equipment, shade structure, and BBQ areas. Residential Design Review The proposed project modifies the previously approved Residential Design Review No. 2005-09 by changing the condominium type from 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each to 163 single-family condominium residences. The proposed modification increases the number of units by 17. Furthermore the proposed project modifies the previously approved design to incorporate a higher quality aesthetic that is incorporated into the modified building types. The proposed 163 residences will feature three floor plans and three architectural styles, thus providing for 18 different potential product types. The proposed design incorporates enhanced elevations on those elevations that are exposed to public areas. Architectural Styles The architectural character of the community will consist of three (3) distinctive, yet compatible, architectural styles. A. Spanish Colonial B. Craftsman C. Tuscan Each of the accepted architectural styles employ common textures of white to pastel and earthen tone colors, stucco or stone walls, tile and shingle roofs, similar roof pitches, and simple ornamentation and details. The three architectural styles accepted within The Village at Lakeshore are outlined below. Each distinctive style is briefly outlined by its key design characteristics and elements, and by design criteria specific to The Village at Lakeshore. Recreational Amenities A Craftsman style recreational facility will be provided in the center of the community. The facility will consist of a swimming pool, spa, restrooms and shower facility to be utilized by community residents and their guests. In addition to the recreational facility, an active turf area and active park area that includes a play structure, shade area, and BBQ areas. Landscaping Decorative monumentation walls, gates and paving will be provided at both entrances into the project. Moreover, specimen trees including will be utilized at the entrances, augmented by a variety of shrubs and ground cover. A decorative sound wall will be CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 June 23, 2015 Page 4 of 6 erected along the Highway 74 frontage that will incorporate slump block with split face block accents and pilasters. The pilasters will have pointed and bull -nose caps. A six-foot wide landscaped planter will occur outside both the Highway 74 and Grand Avenue walls behind the sidewalk. The pool area will incorporate a 6'-0" high decorative stucco finish block wall with ledger stone pilasters and 6'-0" high tubular steel fence with ledger stone pilasters. Street trees will consists of London Plane and Magnolia trees augmented with various shrubs and ground cover. Plantings within the interior of the site will be achieved in front of residential buildings and along street side and rear yard situations. Decorative Street and parking lot lighting will be erected throughout the site along with architecturally treated common mailbox structures. Analysis The proposed project has a General Plan Designation of Specific Plan, is located in the Lake View Planning District, and has a Zoning designation of Specific Plan. The amendment to the specific plan and the residential design review are consistent with the General Plan. The Specific Plan as amended is consistent with the Residential Design Review. The proposed residential project provides a high quality design that incorporates efficient site planning. The proposed detached condominiums creates a hybrid of traditional single family dwelling units and traditional attached condominiums that incorporate the best elements of the two. The overall architectural elements enhanced elevations, architectural variations, and building plane articulations to create an architecturally interesting design which avoids the appearance of sheer walls. The conceptual landscaping has been effectively incorporated to help offset the visual impacts of the proposed project and has been conditioned for final review and approval by the City to ensure the final landscape plan/palette is consistent with the conceptual plan. The applicant has proposed adequate internal recreational amenities and has been conditioned to pay appropriate park in -lieu fees to mitigate potential impacts do the increased residential units. All potential impacts of the proposed project have been identified and mitigated as part of the Environmental Review process. Environmental Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was approved by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 June 23, 2015 Page 5 of 6 has been prepared. All technical studies included previously prepared were updated as needed and the new information was included in the Addendum. Any new mitigation measures that were previously prepared were updated if needed to account for new information. The combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. Fiscal Impact All costs associated with the processing of the Specific Plan Amendment and the Residential Design Review have been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. The Project has been conditioned to pay all applicable development impact fees, incorporate into various community facility districts, and require the internal maintenance of roads, landscaping, community amenities, and other such items to be paid for by the Homeowner's Association. In order to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City, the project has been conditioned that the applicant annex into Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (Condition of Approval No. 107). Additionally, Condition of Approval 108 requires the applicant to consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right- of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Prepared by: Justin Kirk, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Grant Taylor Director of Community Development Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 June 23, 2015 Page 6 of 6 Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. City Council Resolutions and Ordinance 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Updated Specific Plan 6. Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 7. Planning Commission Staff Report 4-21-15 8. Planning Commission Staff Report 5-5-15 VICINITY MAP SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2014-02 & RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-07 PROJECT SITE CITY 01: LAI -LNlloo--E Attachment 1 AERIAL MAP SPECIFIC PLAN 2014-02 & RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-07 I'l ), OF f )R IAM EX III EM I Attachment 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REGARDING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-01 AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 ADOPTING ADDENDUM #1 TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2006-05. WHEREAS, Peter M. Olah, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of amendments to the previously approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02) proposing a single- family detached condominium project and building designs for 163 detached condominiums and related improvements located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (Assessor Parcel Numbers 379-050-006, 379-050-034, 387- 170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387-080-003, and 387-080-004); and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2006, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the residential development of the subject property, which is now part of Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 and Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 was prepared to determine if the Project would have any new significant impacts on the environment. The addendum found no new impacts that exceeded the previously identified impacts that could not be mitigated through the existing mitigation measures contained in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 and updated these mitigation measures to meet current standards; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Resolution No. 2015-39 recommending that the City Council adopt Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 for Specific Plan 2005-02 Amendment #1 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 2 OF 4 Commission for Specific Plans and Residential Design Review applications, and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015 at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed Addendum #1 to MND 2006-05, the CEQA documents, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: 1. That the Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Initial Study have occurred; specifically: a. There have not been any substantial changes to the residential design that require major revisions of the CEQA documents because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time MND 2006-05 was adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown MND 2006-05; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND 2006-05 would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 3 OF 4 Declaration No. 2006-05. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA; and recommends to the City Council that it make the same finding. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addendum #1 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and finds that Addendum #1 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 for Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of June 2015, by the following vote: Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 4 OF 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of June, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN WHEREAS, Peter M. Olah, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of amendments to a previously approved Specific Plan proposing a single-family detached condominium project and building designs for 163 detached condominiums and related improvements located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (Assessor Parcel Numbers 379-050-006, 379-050-034, 387- 170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387-080-003, and 387-080-004); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to Residential Design Review; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval or denial of specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Resolution No. 2015-40 recommending that the City Council adopt findings that Amendment #1 to Specific Plan # 2005-02 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are consistent with the MSCHP; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC') the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for commercial design review applications; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to adopting Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the City Council makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project site is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. Based upon the site reconnaissance survey there are no issues regarding consistency with the MSCHP's other "Plan Wide Requirements." The only requirements potentially applicable to the Project were the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP) and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (Section 4 of the MSHCP Ordinance). The Project site is located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, and has no habitat present on site, including riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Joint Project Review processes. As stated above, the Project is not located within a Criteria Cell and therefore the Project was not processed through the City's LEAP and a Joint Project Review. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 3 OF 5 The site reconnaissance survey revealed that no riparian, riverine, verna pool/fairy shrimp habitat or other aquatic resources exist on the site. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The site does not fall within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Neither a habitat assessment nor further focused surveys are required for the Project. Therefore, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the Project. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP only requires additional surveys for certain species if the Project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP. The Project site is not located within any of the Critical Species Survey Areas. Therefore, the provisions of MSCHP Section 6.3.2 are not applicable. The Project is consistent with the UrbaniWildlands Interface Guidelines. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.1.4 are not applicable. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. There are no resources located on the Project site requiring mapping as set forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.4 are not applicable. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 5 10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council finds that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 23rd day of June, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 5 OF 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE f SS I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of June, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Peter M. Olah, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of amendments to the previously approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02) proposing a single- family detached condominium project and building designs for 163 detached condominiums and related improvements located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (Assessor Parcel Numbers 379-050-006, 379-050-034, 387- 170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387-080-003, and 387-080-004); and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65453(a) states that a specific plan shall be amended in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance and may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval or denial of specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties and adopted Resolution No. 2015-41 recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Plan, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan, and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed specific plan amendment pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-_ PAGE 2 of 5 SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum #1 to the MND adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (SPA 2014-02): 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et sea. of the California Government Code and Section 17.204 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located, 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well -integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The proposed detached single-family residential dwelling units as described by the proposed amended Specific Plan provide residential development with that is consistent with the previously developed adjacent areas. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic that will be generated due to implementation of Amendment No. 1 of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been reviewed and accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit and bicycle. 4. Amendment No. 1 of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan identifies methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by the Municipal Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 of 5 The Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. The applicant/developer shall develop adequate internal recreational facilities and pay in -lieu fees that will offset any impacts to the community. 5. The overall design of Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (SPA 2014-02) will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. All applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the Amendment No 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and all applicable comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances have been implemented, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a less than significant level, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was adopted by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. The combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and the Addendum adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial and such other matters as reflected in the record, and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 of 5 APPROVED AND INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 23rd day of June 2015; and Adopted at the regular City Council meeting of , 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore City Council ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 5 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2015-_ was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of June 23, 2015, and adopted at the regular meeting of , 2015, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, CMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGNS FOR 163 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DWELLING UNITS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, Peter M. Olah, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 for the construction of a 163 detached single-family condominium units and associated improvements for property located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, (Assessor Parcel Numbers 379-050-006, 379-050-034, 387-170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387- 080-003, and 387-080-004). (the "Project'); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines"), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was approved by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Addendum) has been prepared. The combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the residential design review; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item, and adopted Resolution No. 2015-42 recommending that the City Council approve Residential Design Review No. 2014-07: and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for residential design review applications, and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015 at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the 163 residential homes and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan, Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum #1 to the MND adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.184, the City Council makes the following findings regarding Residential Design Review No. 2014-07: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the zoning district in which the project is located. The proposed project has a General Plan and Zoning Designation of Specific Plan. The proposed residential product has been designed in a manner that is consistent with the Specific Plan adopted for the subject properties. The overall project is consistent with the adjacent developments and does not propose a significant increase in intensity of development in the area. 2. The detached residential development complies with the design directives contained in the Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and all applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 4 The residential development is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments. The three (3) architectural styles proposed will create a distinctive street scene within the project site. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.184.070 of the Municipal Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.184. Pursuant to Section 17.184.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Project was considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing held on June 23, 2015. The single-family detached residential development, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum #1 to the MND adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby approves Residential Design Review No, 2014-07. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 23rd day of June, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of June, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE City of Lake Elsinore, California SPECIFIC PLANAMMMMN0.1 Prepared by: Paradigm Engineering Group 427 E 17°i Street #261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Sunwootl Lakeview, LLC April 2015 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] CONTACTS The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No.l City of Lake Elsinore, California Prepared For: City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA Contact: Richard 7 MacHott Planning Manager (95 1) 674-3124 ext. 209 Prepared By: Paradigm Engineering Group 427 E. Seventeenth St. #261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Contact: Peter M. Olah Principal (909) 208-2971 Paradigm Sunwood Engineering Lakeview 1,lih_ItiLSII IC>I�F Group LLC 11 PARAllIGM ENGINEIIRING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Contacts..................................................................................................i Tableof Contents......................................................................................ii Listof Figures.........................................................................................iv Listof Tables............................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. SPECIFIC PLAN PURPOSE.............................................................................................1-1 1.2. AUTHORITY OFTHE HE SPECIFIC PLAN.........................................................................1-2 1.2.1. Specific Plan ....................................... ............................................................................. 1-5 1.2.2. Subdivision Map..............................................................................................................1-6 1.3. PROJECT SUMMARY.......................................................................................................1-6 1.4. L.OCATION.........................................................................................................................1-7 1.5. PROJECTOBJECTIVES .......................................... .............. ........................................... 1-8 2.0 PLANNING FRAME WORK ..............................................................................................2-1 2.1. JURISDICTIONAL CONTEX'I........................................................................................ -1 2.1.1 General Plan Consistency .............................................. ................. 2-1 2.1.2. General Plan Land Use.......................................................................................2-I 2.1.3. Summary of Jwrisdictional Approvals/Amendments..........................................2-2 ............... 4-4 2.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS...............................................................................................2-2 ............................................. .....4-4 2.2.1. Land Use Setting................................................................................................2-2 2.2.2. Circulation ............................................ .............................................................. 2-3 2.2.3. Topography.........................................................................................................2-3 4-5 2.2.4. Water and Sewer.................................................................................................2-3 2.2.5. Geology and Soils..............................................................................................2-3 2.2.6. Drainage.............................................................................................................2-3 2.2.7. Seismicity........ ................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.8. Biology...............................................................................................................2-4 2.2.9. Noise ............. ................................... ..................................................................2-4 2.2.10. Air.....................................................................................................................2-5 2.2.11. Visual................................................................................................................2-5 2.2.12 Summary of Existing Conditions......................................................................2-5 2.3. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES ..............................................................................................2-8 3.0 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN..................................................................................3-1 3.1. LAND USE ALLOCA"I'ION.............................................................................................3-1 4.0 CIRCULATION PLAN.........................................................................................................4-1 4.1. VEI IICULAR SYSTEM...................................................................................................4-2 4.1.1. Collector Street .............. .................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2. Shared Access Alleys.........................................................................................4-4 4.1.3. Enhance Areas ... ................................................................................. ............... 4-4 4.1.4. School Zone ....... .............................. ................ ............................................. .....4-4 4.1.5. Parking Areas.....................................................................................................4-4 4.2. NON-VEI IICULAR SYS'FEM.........................................................................................4-5 4.2.1 Collector Street Sidewalk ....... ............................................................................ 4-5 PAI?ADIGNi ENGINFFAZI G Gimp THF VILLAGE A'I' I,AKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 1NFRASTI2UCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES................................................................5-1 5.1. WATER ................................. ............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2. SEWER .................................................... ......................................................................... 5-1 5.3. DRAINAGE.....................................................................................................................5-1 5.4. UTILITIES ................................ ............................................................................ ............ 5-2 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION..............................................................................................................6-1 6.1. ZONING DESIGNATIONS.............................................................................................6-5 6.2. DESIGN GUIDELINES...................................................................................................6-6 6.2.1. Site Planning Guidelines....................................................................................6-7 6.2.2. Architectural Design Guidelines........................................................................6-9 6.2.3. Community Architectural Style. .............. ........................................................ 6-14 6.2.4. Landscape Design Guidelines .............. ........................................................... 6-18 6.3. PHASING .......................................................................................................................6-30 6.4. FINANCING/MAINTENANCE PLAN............................................................... ......... 6-30 6.5. ADJUSTMENTS AND REVISIONS .................................... ........................................ 6-33 7.0 REFEIZENCES ......................................................................................................................7-1 11 PAienuicm ENG1N1TR1N(; Grouil 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESI TORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES Figure1-I. Regional Map......................................................................................................................1-3 Figure1-2. Vicinity Map ........... ............................................................................................................. 1-4 Figure 2-1. Surrounding Land Use.........................................................................................................2-6 Figure 2-2 Aerial Comparison of Project Site........................................................................................2-7 Figure3-I . Land Use Plan......................................................................................................................3-2 Figure4-1. Circulation Plan...................................................................................................................4-3 Figure 5-1. Proposed Water System Plan...............................................................................................5-3 Figure 5-2. Proposed Sewer Plan............................................................................................................5-4 Figure 5-3. Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet I ...................................... ........................ .......................... 5-5 Figure 5-4. Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet 2........................................................................................5-6 Figure 5-5. Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet 3........................................................................................5-7 Figure 6-1. Conceptual Development Plan............................................................ ................................. 6-4 Figure 6-2. Recreational Center Building.............................................................. ............................... 6-15 Figure 6-3. Typical Outdoor Lighting ....................... ......................................... .................................. 6-16 Figure 6-4. Mailbox Kioslc Placement Concept...................................................................................6-17 Figure 6-5. Conceptual Landscape Plan...............................................................................................6-20 Figure 6-6. Conceptual landscape Details...........................................................................................6-21 Figure 6-7. Wall and Fence Overall......................................................................................................6-22 Figure 6-8. Conceptual Entries and Streetscape Landscape Plan.........................................................6-23 Figure 6-9. Conceptual Recreation Area Landscape Plan....................................................................6-24 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1. Government- Specific Plan Code Requirements..................................................................1-6 'Fable 3-1. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Land Use Summary................................................3-1 Table 4-1. Level of Service - Existing Plus Project With Improvements...............................................4-1 Table 6-1. Residential Development Standards ............... ............................. ................... ....................... 6-2 Table6-2. Plant Material List...............................................................................................................6-27 Table 6-3. Specific Plan Development Standards & Design Guidelines Reference Matrix.................6-30 Table 6-4. Financing and Maintenance Plan.........................................................................................6-31 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction The Milla„e at Lakeshore ,Specific Play Amendment No. 1, City of Lake Elsinore, Califohnio PARADIGM ENGINliERING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMFNDMENT NO 1 IN7RODUC770N 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is located in the city of Lake Elsinore, California. The regional location of the project is illustrated in Figure 1-1, Regional Map. The proposed project is comprised of approximately 19.7 acres of land near the intersection of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. The location is illustrated in Figure 1-2, Vicinity Map. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is a unique plan for development of a planned private residential community consisting of approximately 163 single-family detached condominium residential units. These single-family detached condominium residential units will be for -ownership and include Homeowners Association (HOA) fees. The proposed development is designed to include two entrance areas with paved surface material and accent landscaping, community signage walls with decorative material at each entrance area, a perimeter 6 -foot block wall that secures and privatizes the development, a recreation center area that includes a pool and spa, an open spaced park area that includes play equipment and a shade structure, tour visitor parking areas, a circulation system that accommodates an enhanced parkway landscape with a pedestrian sidewalk, and a detention basin. The Conceptual Development Plan included as Figure 6-1, Conceptual Development Plan illustrates the design features of the proposed development plan for The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1. 1.1. SPECIFIC PLAN PURPOSE The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 (the project) is intended to comprehensively define the development regulations, requirements and design guidelines for the development of the residential neighborhoods, open space, and recreational improvements within the project site. It will establish the type, location, intensity and character of development, and the required infrastructure to support the planned land uses. The Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 defines the methods and requirements necessary for development of the project to insure that City of Lake Elsinore General Plan requirements are implemented. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will provide parameters for establishing a cohesive planned development. This will be achieved by integrating the land use, intensity and aesthetics of development with goals and policies of the General Plan and current market force realities for the community. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEER NG GROUP THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.2. AUTHORITY OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN State of California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Article 8, Section 65450 grants authority to cities to adopt Specific Plans for purposes of implementing the goals and policies of their General Plans_ The Government Code states that specific plans may be adopted either by resolution or by ordinance and that the specific plan is required to be consistent with the General Plan. The Government Code sets forth the minimum requirements and review procedures for specific plans including the provision of a land use plan, infi,astructure and publ is services plan, criteria and standards for development, and implementation measures. The Government Code also states that specific plans may address any other subjects, which in the.judgment of the city are necessary or desirable for implementation of the General Plan. PARADIGM ENGINrERING GROUP 11 1-2 THE VILLAGENI' LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] INTRODUCTION Figure 1-1 Regional Map The Village at Lakeshore Specific Pltm 11 PARADIGM I:NGINEFRING GROUP 11 1-3 TI IE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] INTRODUCTION ! WbGA1D' Figure 1-2 Vicinity Map The tillage at Lakeshore Specific Plan 11 PARADIGM BNGAN1EHUNG GROUP 11 1-4 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 INTRODUCTION Section 65454 of the Government Code mandates that a Specific Plan contain the following: A. A Specific Plan shall include a text and a diagram(s) which specify all of the following: i. The distribution, location and extent of the uses of land including open space within the plan. 2. The proposed distribution, location and extent of major transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, and energy components, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the plan and needed to support the land uses proposed. 3. Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. 4. A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works, and financing measures necessary to fulfill the plan. B. The Specific Plan shall include a statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 to the General Plan. On the following page, Table 11, Government Specific Plan Code Requirements describes how this Specific Plan meets these Government Code requirements. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 is the major component in the City's entitlement approval process that will result in the development of the approximately 19.7 acre The Village at Lakeshore Planned Community. The components of the development approval process for the project are discussed below. 1.2.1. Specific Plan The Specific Plan will serve as a "blueprint" for development establishing the land use and the criteria for development of the land use as set forth herein. The Specific Plan establishes the development requirements and guidelines to be applied to each phase of development within the Specific Plan Area. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 1-5 If IE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] INTRODUCTION Table 1.1, Government Specific Plan Code Requirements Government Code Requirements (listed above) Specific Plan Section Requirement (1.2.AA) Incorporated within Sections 1.0 through 5.0 Requirement (1.2.A.2) Incorporated within Section 3.0, Specific Development Plan Requirement (1.2.A.3) Incognotatedwithin Section 40 Circulation Plan ad Section 5.0 Infrasuveture and Public Facilities Requirement (I .2.13.3) Incorporated within Section 6.0 Implementation, Sub -section 6.1 and 6.2 Requirement (1.2.A.4) Incorporated within Section 6.0 Implementation, Sub -section 6.4 and 6.5 Requirement (1.2.6) Incorporated within Section 7.0 Relation to General Plan Goals and Policies 1.2.2. Subdivision Map A one -lot Tentative Parcel Map No. 33267 will be submitted to the City concurrently with The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. Tentative Parcel Map No. 33267 will be prepared pursuant to the applicable provisions of the State of California Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 through 66499) for creation of detached residential units, the City of Lake Elsinore Subdivision Ordinance, and the applicable provisions contained within The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The tentative parcel map submitted concurrently with the Specific Plan will provide for the basis for development of approximately 19.7 acres. 1.3. PROJECT SUMMARY The proposed Village at Lakeshore project will provide infill development as a planned medium - density community for residential purpose. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan ofapproximately 19.7 acres will provide for up to 163 detached multi -family residential dwelling units. Actions necessary to 'facilitate implementation of this proposed project include the following: • Approval of Specific Plan for the entire project area; • Certification of CEQA documentation for the proposed project; • Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; • Design Review approval for individual project development; and • Change of zone from commercial to MDR (medium density residential) PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 1-6 THE VILLAGE ATLAKESHORESPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 PIANNINGFRA MENIORK The proposed Village at Lakeshore development is sensitive to the site's surrounding physical and environmental conditions. A detailed evaluation of the site's environmental conditions and the market demand were analyzed to establish a sound basis for land use planning decisions. As a result, the land use plan integrates this background analysis into a comprchensivedevelopnnent concept, which incorporates measures, to compliment surrounding residential neighborhoods while at the same time providing a medium density residential mix, which is supported by market denand. Circulation and infrastructure features composed of streets, sewer, water and drainage facilities have been included to facilitate implementation of the project and provide a benefit to the community. To create a healthy lifestyle environment for homeowners, the proposed project establishes a high standard for design quality. The quality is evident in the residential architecture, landscaping and open space/recreational amenities. The proposed project is designed to be a private and gated community with a Ilomeowners Association to manage the development's design aesthetics and to provide long term maintenance of streets. landscaping and private recreation facilities. 1.4. LOCATION The city of Lake Elsinore encompasses approximately 35 square miles in the western portion of Riverside County. The city was founded in 1883 and incorporated in April 1888. Lake Elsinore is the oldest city in Riverside County. The city is located approximately 75 miles southeast of Los Angeles and approximately 35 miles southwest of the city of Riverside. The city is in the Lake Elsinore Valley bounded by the Elsinore and Santa Ana Mountains on the southwest and hills and low mountains of the Perris Valley uplands to the northeast. Within the valley floor lies Lake Elsinore, the largest natural lake in southern California. The lake is approximately five miles long, two miles wide, and contains a surface area of approximately 6,200 acres. Today, the Railroad Canyon Reservoir is the primary source ofwater to the Take. The city's elevation ranges from 1,230 feet at the lake surface area to approximately 2,000 feet in the mountain areas to the south and west (seeFigure 1-1, Regional Mal)). fhe Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 area is located near the western -central area of the city of Lake Elsinore, near the westerly edge of Lake Elsinore. It is bounded on the northwest and southwest by existing residential development and open space and on the northeast and southeast by residential and commercial development, undeveloped commercial property, a public school, Lake Elsinore and open space (see Figure 1-2, VieinityMah). �� PARADIGM E.waNEInNG Gi2oUP 1-7 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESI LORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.1 INTRODUCTION 1.5. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Establishing of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 was prepared and developed to implement the following objectives: • To create a community where homeowners can live in a comfortable, safe and healthy environment, and appreciate the value of living within a lake -style setting of Lake Elsinore. • To create an infill community that enhances the City's vision of incorporating well-planned communities. • To provide a medium density hone ownership opporhmity that meets the needs of current market demand. • To create community continuity by providing a logical transaction of uses from vacant and/or open space areas to the adjoining residential uses. • To develop a plan that implements the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan goals and policies. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 1-8 2.0 PlanninV, Framework The Tillage at Lakeshore Spec{fic Plan Amendment No.], Cily of Lake Elsinore, Cal{'fornia PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE ATLAKESUORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2.0 PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2.1. JURISDICTIONAL CONTEXT 2.1.1 General Plan Consistency The General Plan was adopted in 2011 and outlines goals, policies and standards for land use, development, and environmental quality. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. I establishes both land uses designations and a circulation network to serve the build out of the community in a manner that is complimentary to the surrounding existing land uses and consistent with the adopted General Plan. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 provides for a high quality residential design that compliments the surrounding development and provides a complimentary residential product consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use element of the General Plan. All traffic impacts have been identified and mitigated through an updated traffic study and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, thereby minimizing any impacts and helping to optimize the existing and adjacent roadways in manner consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 maintains an efficient pattern of growth, inclusive of compatible densities of development to surrounding communities, thus proving to be consistent with the General Plan Growth Management Element. Adequate internal recreational facilities have been incorporated into The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. I and external recreational facilities will be augmented through fees paid to the City's Park Pee program. All impacts identified with the implementation of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 have been adequately identified, analyzed with respect to the corollary General Plan goals and objectives, and mitigated to levels of less than significant impacts as part of the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Overall the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. I has provided a high quality designed residential development that is complimentary to the surrounding land uses and the impacts implementation of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 has been adequately mitigated to levels of less than significance, thereby demonstrating consistency with the City's adopted General Plan. 2.1.2. General Plan Land Use The General Plan was adopted in 2011 and outlines goals, policies and standards for land use, devclopment and environmental quality. This document establishes both land use designations and a circulation network to serve the build out of the community. 11 PARADIGM FNGINPRRING GROUP 11 2-1 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 INTRODUCTION The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. I is consistent with the General Plan. Given the General Plan land use designation is "Specific Plan", an amendment to the General Plan will not be required. A detailed analysis of the proposed project relationship with the General Plan is discussed Further in Section 7.0. 2.1.3. Summary of Jurisdictional Approvals/Anrendmcuts As required, The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan follows the currentjurisdictional designations and will proceed to follow the entitlement process which allows development of the proposed land use project: • Approval of a Specific Plan Amendment for proposed property area', Approval of a Tentative Tract Map; and Design Review approval for project development. 2.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.2.1. Land Use Setting Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is an infill property located less than I mile northwest of Lake Elsinore. The current condition of the site consists of exposed soil with moderate grass and weed growth and several large trees concentrated in the north corner of the project site. The proposed project area is bounded by Riverside Drive to the southeast; Grand Avenue to the southwest; a concrete flood control channel to the northwest; and Ulla Lane to the northeast. Existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site include residential and open space areas to the south and northwest ofthe project site, and Lakeside High School located adjacent and northeast ofthe project site (seeTigurc 2-1, Surrounding Land Use). The project area is situated in the Elsinore Valley, northeast of the Santa Ana -Elsinore mountain range, and within a half -mile west of Lake Elsinore, one of the few large natural lakes in southern California. The hills and mountains to the southwest reach elevations as high as 4,400 feet above sea level, but the terrain in the valley is relatively level. The surface elevation of the project site is approximately 1,280 feet above sea level. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 2-2 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I PLANNING FRAMETTORK 2.2.2 Circulation Existing vehicular circulation to the project site is accessible through the following streets: Riverside Drive: Located adjacent to the south side of the project site, Riverside Drive runs in a generally north -south direction and is a major street within the City's circulation plan. It provides access northward to the Interstate 15 corridor which is located approximately 5 miles to the northeast. Grand Avenue: Located adjacent to the project site's west boundary, Grand Avenue runs in a generally east -west direction and is a major street within the City's circulation plan. It provides the principle access to the project site along the southern boundary. It also provides access to residential neighborhoods to the northwest of the project site and easterly to the central core of the city. 2.2.3. Topography The project area is relatively flat with a light slope from the northwest to the southeast, toward the Take. No significant topographic features exist on the site. 2.2.4. Water and Sewer The site is not currently served by public water or sewer systems; however, these systems are located on the periphery of the property. A will serve letter has been issued by Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, 2.2.5 Geology and Soils According to the USGS Soil Szuvey, the project area is underlain by Quaternary young alluvium valley soil. The soils consist of medium dense, damp to moist, fine sandy silt. 2.2.6. Drainage Storm runoff generally flows from the northwest towards the southeast on the project site and in the adjacent area. The South Riverside Channel (Stage 1) is directly adjacent to the northern and western sides of the project site. There are also underground culverts located northeast of the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. Storm runoff from adjacent Tract 10706 is intercepted by an existing catch basin at the west side of Grand Avenue, then conveyed through an existing double culvert that crosses the Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive intersection. Storm runoff fi-om north and west of the project site is intercepted by the South Riverside Channel. (see Figure 5-3, Proposed Drainage Plan). 11 PAR.ADIGnA P,NGINEER1NG GROUP 11 2-3 TI IE VILLAGE ATLAKESHORESPECIFIC PLAN AMLNDMENTNO, I PEANNINGFRAMEWORli 2.2.7 Seismicity The project is not located within a designated earthquake fault zone as defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the Glen Ivy North branch of the Elsinore fault zone located approximately 1.75 miles north-northwest of the project site. A fault study that was performed for the Lake Elsinore Unified School District on the easterly adjacent property concluded that the Wildornar fault was not present on the school district site; however, the Wildomar fault transects the project site and has been determined to be potentially active. Based on the results of the fault study, the project has been designated with a minimum 50 -foot structural setback adjacent to the fault. 2.2.8 Biology Historically, the proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan area was primarily used for agricultural operations and long -tern disturbance by dry land farming and discing. The natural vegetation and soils conditions that once occurred throughout the project area have been altered due to human activity. Based on the findings of site-specific general and focused species-specific biological studies conducted by Michael Brandman Associates, (June 2004), the project site does not contain native and/or sensitive plant species within the project site limits. 2.2.9. Noise An interior noise level of 45dB is mandated by the State of California Noise insulation Standards (CCR, Title 24, Part 6, Section T25-281) for multiple -family dwellings and for hotel and motel rooms and is typically considered a desirable noise level for all residential dwelling units. Since normal noise attenuation within residential structures with closed windows is about 20-25 dB, an exterior noise exposure of 65dB is generally the noise land use compatibility guideline for noise sensitive receiver sites in California. Since commercial and industrial activities are generally conducted indoors, the exterior noise exposure standard for such less -sensitive land uses is less stringent. An Acoustical Impact Analysis was prepared by Webb Associates (February 2005). Along Riverside Drive, the analysis documented that the first floor receiver will be exposed to exterior noise levels as high as 68.22 dB. This exterior noise level is higher than the 65 dB exterior threshold. Therefore, a six-foot sound wall is recommended to be placed along Riverside Drive to mitigate the noise impacts. Along Grand Avenue, the analysis documented that the exterior noise levels were measured at 64.53 dB, which is lower than the 65 dB threshold and does not require a sound wall. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 2-4 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I INTRODUCTION 2.2.10. Air The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has developed surrogate significance thresholds based on the volume ofpolIutiou emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale An Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Webb Associates (February 2005). The study found that two criteria pollutant emissions, ROG and NOx, exceed the SCAQMD suggested significance thresholds during the construction of this project. CO, SO2 and PM -10 do not, however, exceed the threshold. Long- term emissions of all criteria pollutants are below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. The CO I lotspot analysis that was modeled for four project -area intersections that met SCAQMD criteria for such study were all well below the state and federal significance thresholds. Therefore, due to the temporary nature of construction emissions, the cumulative impacts to air quality can be considered less than significant. 2.2.11. Visual The proposed project area has distinctive views of the lake and surrounding hillside and mountains. As a result of the relatively flat nature of the site, the visual character of the property is basically open and underdeveloped, with no on-site distinguished features 2.2.12 Summary of Existing Conditions As shown in Figure 2-2, Aerial Comj)arison ofProjeei Site, environmental changes to the project site or its surroundings have not occured since the approval of the original Specific Plan. Therefore an updated environmental study should not be necessary. An Expanded Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved by the planning commission in August of 2006. This expanded study concluded that implementation of the proposed project will not create any significant impacts related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreaton, or traffic. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEP.RINGGROUP 11 2-5 THC VILLAGE AI' LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMEN]'NO. 1 PLANNING FRAAVEWORK Figure 2-1 Surrounding Land Use The Village aI Lakeshore SpeciTc L'tarr PARADIGM FNGINEERING GROUP 11 2-6 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 PLANNING FR MIA41ORK 2.3. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Pre Iiminaryplanning issues have been identified and briefly discussed. The following evaluation discusses how the development plan will address these issues. These preliminary planning issues were identified based on review of the development plan for the project site, market forces in the city of Lake Elsinore, land use and access compatibility concerns and physical development constraints. Lard Use Relationships: The plan has been developed within the context of the existing residential development to the northwest and southwest, and the existing development to the north and east. Each of these land uses creates a logical and/or real boundary to the project in the interest of creating an aesthetically balanced community. The proposed project is also compatible with the adjacent residential land use areas to the southeast, southwest, and northwest, as well as Lakeside High School to the northeast. Drainage: The proposed project will manage overland surface flows and convey the onsite storm runoff to a water quality basin which will be located at the southeastern corner of the project site. The offsite storm runoff from the west will flow to the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and will be intercepted by the proposed storm drain facilities along Riverside Drive and through the basin conveyed to the existing South Riverside Channel. Alarket Demon([ The Specific Plan is consistent with the City's current and long-term interest to support medium density residential development. As this property has previously been rezoned for Medium Density Residential use, the Specific Plan proposes a medium density residential development to accommodate the current market need for residential property. Access and Circulation The Plan recognizes the importance of an efficient circulation system to facilitate ingress and egress fi-om the project site in a manner which will enhance the City's planned circulation system and not be detrimental to the surrounding existing development. The project proposes to include an acceleration/deceleration lane along Riverside Drive that will be located at the entrance to the project. This designated lane will minimize any potential traffic concern relating to homeowners entering and/or exiting the development. There is a second project entrance area on Grand Avenue. This entrance area will not include an acceleration/deceleration lane. PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 2-8 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I PLANNING FRAMEiVORK Ra(flc and Transportation: The Plan recognizes the need to evaluate the effects on traffic circulation resulting from the development of The Village at Lakeshore (Tract Map 33267). To address this concern a traffic study (Trq fie Tanpact report, Webb Associates, January 2005) was prepared to determine existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the project; evaluate the traffic generated from the development with respect to its impact on the existing and cumulative traffic conditions; and determine the level of service required by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan at all affected intersections, and if not met, determine the mitigation measures thatwill be necessary in order to maintain the required level ofservice. An updated traffic impact study was conducted in July 2014 by VA Consulting, Inc., to analyze impacts based on the increase in number of proposed dwelling units. The analysis concluded that the increase in dwelling units will result in no significant circulation inpacts as compared to the previous study, and the original project findings and mitigation measures remain valid. Alazntenonee: The Plan recognizes single-family, medium density condominium residential development as a desirable alternative for a growing market segment, as opposed to more conventional suburban living. In response to that market demand and in order to establish and maintain a strong family lifestyle within a generally more intense land use setting, the proposed project incorporates a high quality of design and maintenance of that quality over time which is essential to the lifestyle success of the project. Quality control forthe project and its amenities will be achieved through the establishment of sound Homeowners Association and/or private property management group. The project will include a detention basin located near the southeast corner of the project site. The detention basin will be used to manage water quality. Maintenance of the detention basin will be described and included in the Homeowners Association regulations. PABADMM ENGINITRING GROUP 11 2-9 3.0 Specific Development Plan The Pillage of Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, City of Lake Elsinore, California PARADIGM HNGINFERM; GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKGSHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I SPF_CII7C UF, V6%OPMl�:N7T/.�IN 3.0 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3.l . LAND USE ALLOCTION The Specific Plan area is approximately 19.7 acres gross and the entire land use category for the project site will be "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) (see Figure 3-1, Land Use Plan). This area will contain a target yield ofan estimated 163 dwelling units at a density of approximately 8.3 units per acre which is below the maximum yield allowed of up to 12.0 units per acre, within this Specific Plan land use designation. Below, Table 3-1, The Village at Lakeshore Specific PlanLand Use Surnrnary presents the land use summary. The residential product planned for this area is condominiums. It is projected that the residential units will consist of two-story buildings, with individual attached garages. The intent of this land use designation is to accommodate detached condominium residences in single- family structures with a density of approximately 8.3 units per acre. This land use area will be developed as a private residential community with access points along and adjacent to Riverside Drive. The private community will include internal streets and common open space with recreational amenities. This development, including the recreational facilities, will be maintained by a Homeowners Association or development owner. Table 3-1, The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Land Use Suwmnary LAND USE LANDUSE ACREAGE TARGET T'ARGI'.T DESIGNATION YIELD Residential Mcdium Density Rm(kjud MDR 19.7 8.3 DU/AC 163 DUs 11 PARADICM ENGINFERING GROUP 11 3-1 9IIN3hV ON Vtl `J 7z LU Z) U) a W z < �o 7 - Cl) LU W C) LU 4.0 Circulation The Village al Lakeshore Spcgfie Plan A117CII(II77e)71 No. /, City of Lake Elsinore, California PARADIGM ENGINFTRING GROUP THE VILLAGE A"f LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO I CIRCUI4TION 4.0 CIRCULATION PLAN The project site will be served by a system of existing and proposed roadways. The existing roadways include Riverside Drive as the northern boundary of the project site and Grand Avenue serving the western boundary of the project site. These two streets will provide access to and from the project site. On-site circulation within The Village at Lakeshore Planned Community will be provided through a system of private streets to be constructed internal to the project. A Traffic impact Study Report (Webb Associates, January 2005), and updated Traffic Impact Study Report (VA Consulting, July 2014) concluded that the proposed project along with area -wide growth cannot be accommodated within the existing circulation system at the intersections in the study area. However, recommended offsite improvements will improve projected conditions to LOS D or better at City maintained roads during AM and PM peak hours. Tahle 4-1, Level of Service Existing Plus Project With Imhrovemems identifies the Level of Service (LOS) near the vicinity of the proposed project area. it is estimated that the following LOS will not be exceeded: Table 4-1, Level of Service — Intersection Existing Plus Project With Improvements Traffic Control AM Peak Hour Status LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Grand Ave/Machado St AWSC A 13 Grand Ave/Riverside Dr. TWSC B 13 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Signal C 13 Grand Ave/Macy St Signal A A Lincoln St/Riverside Dr Signal 1) C. Lakeshore Dr/Riverside Dr Signal C C School Entrance/Riverside Dr Signal B A Stadium Way/Riverside Dr Signal B A AWSC NI -way .Stop Conu'o11,d Tws( ]F,. way sup Convollcd The traffic impact analysis study also recommended the construction of full width improvements of internal roadways and part width improvements of the following roadways in order to comply with City of Lake llsinore standard. 11 PARADIGM IiNGINDTING GROUP 11 4-1 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIPIC PLAN AME'NDME'NT NO.1 CIRCULATION • Construct partial width improvements on the easterly side of Grand Avenue at its ultimate cross-section as a modified Arterial highway (120' right-of-way) adjacent to project boundary line. • Construct partial width improvements on the northerly side of Riverside Drive at its ultimate cross-section as a modified Urban Arterial Highway (123' right-of-way) adjacent to project boundary line. • The Village at Lakeshore project shall comply with both Caltrans and City sight distance standards at the designated project entrances. The proposed roadway system shall be reviewed with respect to the City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. The Circulation Plan (shown in Figure 4-1, Circulation Plan) is intended to illustrate the general layout and design standards of roadways and pedestrian pathways for The Village at Lakeshore community to safely meet the circulation needs of the residents. The circulation concept consists of an internal street system focused on a primary collector street. 4.1. VEHICULAR SYSTEM The vehicular circulation system for the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 consists of a collector street system that inter -links the residential units and driveway system within the project. These are discussed as follows: 4.1.1. Collector Street Vehicular access and circulation through The Village at Lakeshore community is primarily provided by a collector sheet which allows residents of the project to access Riverside Drive on the east and Grand Avenue to the south. Design standards are described as follows, and sheet sections (see Figure 4-1, Circulation Plan). • Collector Street will have a thirty-two (32) -foot pavement section to accommodate one twelve (12) foot travel lane in each direction, on -street parallel parking (8' width) and 'five (5) -foot sidewalks along both sides. PARADIGM t'.NGINJTRING GROUP 11 4-2 I L I . TlE t F T -,j r t � i , IS Y F anu�valrvao Z N V < C m J o o��- ro T U v ZLL ro Q — o` J C) c a z w w O � s Q w J Up U U) w Y LU J w H Pl� THF; VILLAGE, AT LAKESHORL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I CIRCULATION 4.1.2. Shared Access Alleys All of the units within The Village at Lakeshore community will have individual garage access. The resident's garage will be accessible through the use of a shared access alley. The shared access alleys range from twenty-four feet to twenty live feet (24'-25) in approximate width, are accessible from the adjacent internal street system, and are located behind or in fi-ont of the individual dwelling units. 4.1.3. Entrance Areas The Village at Lakeshore community includes two entrances located on Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. Each entrance will include a 6' wrought iron gate with rapid entry system, and provide four (4) stacking spaces to allow resident owners and guests to enter and exit the community. 4.1.4. School Zone The Village at Lakeshore community is located directly west and adjacent to Lakeside High School (see Figure 2-1. Surrounding Lowl Use). The project's Riverside Drive entrance will be located near the school facility. The design of the entrance will promote a deceleration of vehicles onto and towards the school zone. 4.1.5. Parking Areas The Village at Lakeshore community will accommodate approximately seventy-one (71) parking spaces for visitors and two (2) handicap Parking spaces. These spaces will be located along the internal street system and adjacent to the recreation area as well as the parte area. 11 PAs,vncmENGINEERM;GRoui, 11 4-4 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO I CIRCULATION 4.2. NON -VEHICULAR SYSTEM The Village at Lakeshore project provides for a pedestrian walkway system on the collector street to supplement the vehicular system and provide for linkages to neighbors, and internal open space/recreational amenities. The pedestrian walkway system will be comprised of a sidewalk as part of the Collector Street. 4.2.1. Collector Street Sidewalk The internal Collector street system will incorporate a five (5) -foot wide sidewalk on both sides of the street abutting the back of the curb. The sidewalk layout and section is illustrated in Figure 4-1, Circulation Plan 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 4-5 5.0 Infrastructure and Public Services The pillage cd Lakeshore Specific P1017 Amendment No. 1, ON of Lake lalsinore, California PARADIGM IiNGINHP.RING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 INFRASTRUCTURE 4, P(BIIC SERVICES 5.0 INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES Infrastructure and public services provided within the Specific Plan are described in the following sub -sections. Conceptual system plans are shown for water, sewer, and drainage; however, this plan represents a preliminary service layout and is subject to modification upon final engineering design. 5.1. WATER Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provides domestic water to the project area from a system of distribution mains located in Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. An internal water main loop will be provided within the collector street circulation loop. Water service improvements for this project will be limited to the in -tract distribution mains as depicted on Figure 5-I, Proposed Waler Syslene Plan, 5.2. SEWER Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District provides sanitary sewer collection and treatment services for all development within the project area. Existing collection mains exist within both Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. The project area will be served by a system of 8 -inch collector lines within the collector street system. These collectors will convey gravity flows south to the existing main in Riverside Drive and westerly to Grand Avenue. This design will be dependent on the final engineering analysis. Sewer improvements for this project will be limited to the in -tract collection mains as depicted on Figure 5-2, Proposed Server Plan. 5.3. DRAINAGE The City of Lake Elsinore provides storm water drainage facilities within the city. Existing collection and conveyance facilities within the project area include a combination or in -street pipes and curb drainage which ultimately outfall into Lake Elsinore. Storm water runoff within the project area will be collected through a system of on-site storm drain pipes, and into an onsite water quality basin with diversion beam and bio Swale. Plows will then be discharged into the existing South Riverside Channel Stage 1, adjacent to Riverside Drive. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 5-1 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I 7NHR.�f.STR(7CTURF.' ti P1 /]317C SERVK'liS Drainage improvements for this project will be limited to the in -tract collection pipes and connections to existing storm drains at the perimeter of the project area. Prior to departing the project area, storm water will enter a water quality basin located at the southeast corner of the project site. The sizing of the detention basin will be dependent on final engineering analysis. The proposed storm drain improvements are illustrated on Figure 5-3, (Sheelsl-3) Grading X Drainage Plan. 11 5.4. UTILITIES Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company currently provide electricity and natural gas respectively to the city of Lake Elsinore and the project area. AT&T and Comcast Cable provide telephone and cable communication service to the project area. These facilities currently exist along both Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue which border the project site and will be extended into the project by way of underground conduits. These utility services will be located underground within all the project streets. Above -ground appurtenances (transformers, etc.) will be placed behind the face of curb at various locations. If necessary, adequate buffering will be placed to screen the units. 11 PARADIGM ENGINP.r RING GROUP 11 5-7 =UttLl11 'II 11, N Z �Q z � gw 0- U) >W co Ir m W W Y o Q o¢ �w �0 J W i I hL cz Co N U) mw (Y) r)) z 0 CL (L < _j D CL a- Lu LLFNN Nz U4 Lj 0 0 —Z < < Z Lu w jr T- lw rr LLJ U, 0 Z < w N 68- > o od LL 11 :Z) -o < 0 LL �— CC 0 Z z 0 WAV z 0 w U6 w lo > z w 0 IS nt, e Nltp m LILLo 1- w 6i --------------r r 1 t t N I Z 133HS ADS 6.0 Implementation The hilly e at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, Cily q/Lake Elsinore, Calilbrnia PARADIGM ENC31NE)Ji1NG GROUP THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPI FMENTATION 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is the primary guidance tool used to meet the required approval steps for development. The Plan establishes the character of the development through the definition of permitted land use, required infrastructure, development regulations and design guidelines. The concepts and regulations contained in this section provide the framework upon which all subsequent implementation planning decisions are based, and criteria for determining consistency of site specific design with the Specific Plan Amendment No. I objectives. It is the purpose of this Section to identify the development standards, design parameters, zoning designation, design guidelines, development phasing, financing and maintenance plan, development review process, and adjustments/revisions for The Village at Lakeshore project. As such, these standards supersede the corresponding City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Ordinance sections and previously approved Specific Plan. Where the Specific Plan Amendment No. I is unclear on a development issue, regulation or procedure, or where reference is made to a specific ordinance section, the applicable section(s) of the City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Ordinance and/or other applicable City ordinances shall take precedent. Where the proposed project's development standards do not agree with the City's ordinances or previously approved Specific Plan, the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 shall take precedent. Table 6-1, Residential DeveloRment Standards, provides general guidance in determining which documents are applicable for addressing the various regulatory parameters. In addition to the development standards, design guidelines have been established to provide clarification towards the implementation of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1. These guidelines provide further definition for the project's design objectives and the intended development character. The design guidelines are intended to establish a consistent design approach that is evident in the site planning, engineering, architecture and landscape architectural components. Examples of desirable design elements are described in the following pages. All diagrams, sketches and other graphic representations contained in this section are for conceptual purposes only and do not depict final designs. They are not intended to depict any actual lot or specific building design and do not limit the range of expression by future builders and/or their professional design teams. 11 PARAI)IGNI ENGINRrIUNG GROUP 11 6-1 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I IA71'LLAIENTATION Table 6-1, Residential Development Standards NOTE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA STANDARD I Lot Area Minimum(sq fl N/A 1 Lot Arca Per Dwelling Unit (sq It)I N/A N/A 7 Strcet Frontage Lori Width (sq Il) 7 Clusterr Product Minimum Setbacks Excluding Architectural Pop Outs (ft)' 3 2" • Alley Curb to Building • Building to Building 10' • Side Yatd —Building to Common Fence 5 Back Yard — Building to Pro,Icct Boundary 8' • FiontYerd— Building to Buck of Sidewalk 12' 3 Green Belt Product Minimum Setbacks Excluding Archileclmal Pop Outs (ft)? • Alley Curb to Building 5' • Front Building to Building 18' Front Building to Back of Sidewalk 6' • Side Building to Building 10 • Side Building to Back of Sidewalk 8' • Corner Location Budding to Back of Sidewalk 5' 4 • Accessory Strne(nl'e - Front N/A - ...__.__. _. • Accessory Stiucture - Side ------ N/A • Accessory Situctme Bear N/A • Accesscay Structure Side N/A i5 Piojecuons into Required Yaids N/A 6 Lot Coverage (%) N/A Building Height (1L) 125'-9" Masimum Dwelling Unit Size Minimum (sq. Il) • Two Bedroom of I aigei Unit 1.641 sq 1t Minimum Opcn Space (sq IL) 7 Limited Open Space N/A 8 . Ili vatc Open Space 393 sq ft Minimum Parking q • 'Iwo or Mote 13cchsxnn llnils 2 Spaces Minimum Building Separation Minimum (Il) _ • Main Structures 10'Minimuna • Accessory SuucWlcs �— III' Minimum 11 PAIiAI)IGM ENGINITIZING GROUP 11 6-2 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPLLMEN7:4770N Notes: (1) Development is recognized as Medium Density Residential Detached Residential Units which can also be referenced as owner occupied condominium units. Therefore, the property is recognized as a One -Lot Area. (2) Setbacks are from external parcel property lines. (3) Main structures consist of the habitable residential buildings. (4) Accessory structure to be attached to the main structure and for uninhabitable use. (5) No yard encroachments shall project closer than 3 feet to a property line. (6) Coverage is for habitable main structures (excluding accessory structures) (7) Limited open space will be the area contained within the recreation facilities and designated open turf areas. (8) The private open space requirement may be reduced by a corresponding increase in common open space at the ratio of an additional 1.5 sq fl of common open space (over and above the base requirement of 250 sq ft/unit) for every 1.0 sq ft of private open space reduction. (9) Resident owners will have enclosed parking spaces, with the option to use available side street parking. 11 PARADIGM FINGINEERING GROUP 11 6-3 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESI IORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO I IA�IPLZA1fENT4770N These design guidelines are intended to benefit the builder, the design team, and the City stat -fin reviewing the development proposal. They are also intended to streamline the review process through clarification of the design's intent and minimize any misunderstanding. 6.1. ZONING DESIGNATIONS The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan includes a single land use designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR), with MDR zoning. Where development standards and/or design guidelines for the zoning designations in this proposed project do not agree with the corresponding City Zoning Code designation, the provisions of this Specific Plan Amendment No. I shall apply. It is the intent of the Specific Plan that development shall be allowed only if the proposed development meets the requirements for the Medium Density Residential land use designation. Medium Density Residential: This zone is intended to accommodate detached single-family condominium residential units in a pattern consistent with the Conceptual Development Plan shown in Figure 6-I, Conceptual Development Plan. However, the conceptual plan is not the final development design and therefore may be modified in the final design due to final engineering analysis. This zone is characterized by a dwelling unit size ranging from approximately 1,641 sq, ft. to approximately 2,485 sq. ft. An overall density of approximately 8.3 units per acre is envisioned. Permitted uses are listed in the development standards, and applicable design guidelines are described in Section 6.2. Permitted Uses: Uses permitted in this zoning designation shall include those listed below when developed in compliance with the purpose and intent of this Specific Plan. • Single-family detached condominium residences. • Detached Dwelling Units • Recreation facilities that include but are not limited to an open -space area with shade structures, playground area with playground equipment, and a recreation building that includes bathrooms, a shower, a room far storage, and a room to host the pool equipment. • Accessory structures pursuant to Zoning Code Section 17.80.040, Sub -section 13, only numbers 2, 3, 5, 7, & 8. 11 PARADIGM ENGINPAIRING G12oup 11 6-5 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMEN"F NO. I IMPLLMLNDITION 6.2. DESIGN GUIDELINES The intent of the Design Guidelines contained in this Section is to establish the architectural and landscape themes for The Village at Lakeshore, and to express the community's identity. These Design Guidelines shall form the basis and criteria for the review and evaluation of future plans submitted to the City of lake Elsinore for approval. The purpose of these guidelines is: To assure the City of Lake Elsinore and the master developer that The Village at Lakeshore will develop in accordance with the approved design principles contained within this Specific Plan. 2. To provide guidance to the City Council, Planning Commission and City staff in the review of future development and construction activities within The Village at Lakeshore. 3. To provide guidance to builders, architects, engineers, landscape architects and other design professionals to maintain the design quality of the project. 4. To build a community that will maintain its quality over the years. 5. To provide a recreation area that includes swimming pool, spa, shade structures, open landscape areas, 2 gas barbeque grills, and 5 trash receptacles, as well as an enhanced paving surface, and a secured gate that is accessible and commonly shared by all residents. 6. To provide open space areas and playground area for passive recreation purpose to be commonly shared by all residents. 7. To develop a detention basin to retain storm runoff for water quality purpose. 8. To provide two separate gated entrances for the private community. To build entrances that include a community sign wall, enhanced paving surface, and accent landscaping. 10. To build a six-foot block wall that encloses the community. 11. To provide a pedestrian sidewalk system throughout the community that meets ADA requirements and allows for an internal and external relationship. 12. To provide an entrance on Riverside Drive that promotes the deceleration of vehicles to accommodate a nearby school zone. 11 PARADIGM BNGWGPRING GROUP 11 6-6 TI IE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPLTMFNTATION The following elements are addressed in these Design Guidelines: 1. Site Planning Guidelines 2. Architectural Design Guidelines 3. Landscape Design Guidelines The Site Planning Guidelines provide the plotting concepts, design criteria, public and private design elements which are to direct the design of the final site plan/tentative tract map. The Architectural Design Guidelines set forth the allowable residential architectural styles within The Village at Lakeshore. The architectural characteristics of building articulation, massing, roof forms, colors and materials, windows and doors and accents are outlined, along with typical elevations. The Landscape Design Guidelines express the community landscape themes for The Village at Lakeshore: The guidelines present the overall community landscape, entry treatments, public and private walls and fences, and plant materials. 6.2.1 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES The site planning of the residential community created by The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will be guided by the following residential product siting concepts and siting criteria. Siting Concepts: The development concept of the project is based on the siting of a single-family detached condominium product. 2. Emphasis in residential building articulation should be placed on elevations facing internal streets, common/public open spaces, and off site areas. Facades (all four sides) should include features such as patios, porches, courtyards, entry doors or windows that create a welcoming appearance from adjacent common area and streets. PARADIGM ENGINrERWG GROUP 11 6-7 THE VILLAGEATLAKESTORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. I _ IMPLEMENT1TION 4. Utilities should be underground, or screened from public view where feasible. Above ground mechanical equipment, meter cabinets, etc., shall be placed so as to not block access to private side or rear yards. 5. Residential units shall be buffered from existing adjacent land uses and/or future nonresidential uses that may create negative impacts. 6. Ancillary uses and structures, such as parking and trash enclosures, shall be placed so they are fully integrated with the community. 7. Trash and/or recyclable material storage shalt be kept within the property limits of each individual unit, within that units'sideyard or garage. HOA approved guidelines will identify the rules and regulations associated with each homeowner's responsibility of disposal of trash and/or recyclable material. Trash and/or recyclable material collection shall be provided by the City at a rate assessed to each homeowner. The recreation area shall include a swimming pool, spa, 2 gazebo shade structuers, 2 gas barbeque grills, 5 trash receptacles, enhanced paving surface and a secured gate. Buildings associated with the recreational areas shall reflect the architectural styles described in Section 6.2.2, Architectural Design Guidelines, below, as shown in Figure 6-2, Recreational Building. 10. A smaller recreation "Mini Parte" shall include a shade structure, 6 picnic tables, a play area with equipment, 4 trash receptacles, 9 parking spaces, and open space landscape areas. 11. Homeowner mailboxes shall be provided in a clustered manner and shall reflect the architectural styles described in Section 6.2.2, Architectural Design Guidelines 12. Lighting shall be located and designed so as to minimize spill light into the night sky or onto adjacent properties. All lighting fixtures shall be manufactured of high quality materials that are compatible with design elements and architectural styles within the project. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GIZOUI' 11 6-8 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] IMPLEMENTATION Siling Criteria: Residential units should be designed so that varying architectural schemes are are visible from community and public streets. 2. Various setbacks should be used along community streets and public sweets to provide a more varied visual character along streets. 3. Garage and driveway orientations should be varied to break up repetitive curb cuts and common yards, providing a more varied strectscape. 6.2.2 Architectural Design Guidelines The Architectural Design Guidelines represents the opportunities for the architecture of The Village at Lakeshore. The architectural design of the residential dwellings is the key to promoting and reinforcing a distinctive visual environment for the community and its residents. The basic design concepts established in these Architectural Design Guidelines are intended to be flexible in their structure, encouraging builders to create a consistent high-quality design which reflects current market values. Architectural Stvles The architectural character of the community will consist of three (3) distinctive, yet compatible, architectural styles. A. Spanish Colonial. B. Craftsman C. Tuscan Each of the accepted architectural styles employ common textures of white to pastel and earthen tone colors, stucco or stone walls, tile and shingle roofs, similar roof pitches, and simple ornamentation and details. The three architectural styles accepted within The Village at Lakeshore are outlined below. Each distinctive style is briefly outlined by its key design characteristics and elements, and by design criteria specific to The Village at Lakeshore. 11 PARADIGM b.NGINEFRING GROUP 11 6-9 fHE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. I IMPLEMENTATION spanish 5. Spanish architecture is derived from various design sow-ces, including the early mission and pueblo styles, and Moorish influences from Spain. Dominant architectural characteristics include strong, simple one and two-story massing, simple wall surfaces and materials, arches, courtyards and tile roofs. Walls typically convey a "thick" appearance with recessed doors and windows set into smooth wall planes. Arches, courtyards, colonnades and patios are further recognizable elements of the Spanish style. Spanish Style General Attributes Building and Massing Roofs. 1. Mixture of I and 2 -story forms. 1. Simple hip or gable roofs 2. Low pitch roofs, typically 3:12 to 5:12 3. Barrel roof tiles, typically reddish to tobacco in color. 4. Eaves flush with wall or exposed rafter tails; overhanging beam shapes at ends. Windows and Doors 1. Arched doorways and window openings. 2. Some windows deeply recessed and some having molded smrroundings. 3. Vertical windows, typically with divided lines. 4. Doors which are typically natural or stained dark wood. 5. Simple plank shutters (if provided). 11 PARADIGM EN(ANEP.InNG Orin, 11 6-10 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO I I111PLEMENT4770N Materials and Colors 1. Stucco finish achieving a smooth wall plane and thick appearance. 2. Wood used typically as accent trim, doors, porch or balcony railings only. 3. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, primarily white, off-whites and tones of peach or sandy pink. Accents and Details I. Colored ceramic tiles used on steps, around openings and on patio walls. 2. Wrought iron or wood balcony railings. 3. Chimney caps to be stucco or clay tile. Cra sman Style The Craftsman architectural style evolved from the late 19th century Arts and Crafts movements in America and England which focused on traditional hand craftsmanship and simplicity of details in place of elaborate ornamentation. The Craftsman style is typified by the use of natural materials and colors, and is characterized by low sloping roofs, multiple gables, wood or stone siding, tapered wood columns on brick or stone pilasters and porches. General Attributes Building and Massing Roofs Craftsman Style 1. Front porch as major clement of elevation. 2. Gable and shed roofs. 3. Horizontal massing with I and 2 -story elements. 1. Low pitch roots, typically 3:12 to 4:12 2. Flat or shingle tiles. 3. Wide cave overhangs with exposed ratter tails. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NOJ IMPLlMINTATION Windows and Doors 1. Simple wood (or wood -simulated fiberglass) doors with wood trim surroundings. 2. Covered door entry, sometimes raised. 3. Simple windows with wood trim surroundings. 4. Windows typically, vertical, may be grouped as horizontal elements. 5. Louvered shutters (if provided). Materials and Color I. Wood, shingle, brick, stone or stucco finish siding in horizontal banding. 2. Stucco is sand finish and matches other siding color. 3. Roof material is flat concrete or wood shake. 4. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, light earth tone colors with contrasting trim color. Accents and Details 1. Tapered porch columns (wood or stucco) on brick or stone pilasters to mark entries. 2. Wood braces at gable ends. 3. Chimneys - wood siding, brick or stone veneer. Tuscan Style Tuscan style architecture shares many of the historic design sources of other Mediterranean buildings and architecture. Tuscan architecture is organic in nature, having evolved over the centuries, keeping those elements and features which work best with its environment. Primary architectural characteristics include simple one and two-story massing, plain wall surfaces and materials, use of darker, reddish, or pink earth -tone colors and materials, and tile roofs. Walls typically convey a "thick" appearance with recessed doors and windows set into smooth wall planes. Tuscan Style 11 PAPAJ)wNI ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-12 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] IMPLEMENTATION General Attributes Building and Massing Roofs 1. Mixture of 1 and 2 -story forms. 2. Simple hip or gable roofs. 3. Recessed and covered entries. 1. Medium pitch roofs, typically 4:12 to 6:12 2. Barrel rooftiles, typically reddish to tobacco in color. 3. Simple, short roof overhangs. Windows and Doors 1. "Typically rectangular or round headed door and window openings. 2. Some windows recessed and some having exterior stucco plant -on and sills. 3. Windows typically comprised of several small panes rather than single large one. 4. Doors are typically natural or stained dark, "heavy" wood. Materials and Colors 1. Smooth stucco finish with hand -toweled or mottled look. 2. Use of wood, the or brick as design accents only. 3. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, primarily white, off-whites or light pastels. 4. Accent colas typically used on cornice band and window articulations. Accents and Details 1. Columns and archways. 2. Covered walks, patios and entries should be enriched with textured paving. 3. Chimney caps to repeat cornice band treatment and trim color. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-13 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESFIORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.1 IMPLEMENM9ION Community Architectural Sll les Recreational Buildintr The recreational building (Di.splayed in Figure 6-2 Recreational Building) will be located centrally within the residential development, and will feature Craftsman Style architecture in a single story design, with multi -paned windows, board and batten style shutters, stone veneer (as occurs), and a tapered stone base (as occurs). The inside will house a pool equipment room, community showers, storage, and men and women's restrooms, as well as an entry and breezeway. Outdoor Li$lltin$ The typical outdoor lighting (as Shown in Figure 6-3 Typical Oa [door Lighting) will consist of Luminous Hood Lighting to meet UCL (LED) design criteria. The typical lighting found on the exterior of each residence will be consistent with the architectural theme of the building. Mailbox Kiosks Design criteria for mailbox kiosks consists of Cluster Box Units (CBU's). In order to meet the approved design standards of the United States Postal Service for preferred centralized mail delivery, the Cluster Box Units shall accessible from the internal street system. (See Figure 6-4, Mailbox Kiosk Placement Concept) 11 PARADIGM E ANEIIRING GROUP 11 6-14 U T �x z< � ' I QC< ' It Li z �x u, op W x u ��m aQu a X a; t ' o o j s a THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTN0.1 IMPLEMENTATION Streetlight Examples NOTE: This isfor conceptual purposes only. Final design and materials will be subject to approval by the Community Development. Director. Figure h-3 Typical Outdoor Lighting The �' /lgge of Lakeshore Sbec fic Plan Amendment No. I 11 PARADIGM I?NGINYTRING GROUP 11 6-16 30NBAV CNV89 v Z m � U U m-� � � o U� 0- d U � C � m U CWC J �r E0 a) LU o Y BQ Y I— O_ Q Li X Q O J J cts > W S H THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I IMPLF.MFNTATION 6.2.4 Landscape Design Guidelines The landscape image for The Village at Lakeshore was determined by its location, by its natural and built surroundings, and the community history of Lake Elsinore. Generally, Lake Elsinore landscapes have been defined by streetscape plantings, parcel and boundary articulation, Tree wind screens and proximity to the lake. Within the confines of these characteristics, The Village at Lakeshore has established the following goals and landscape criteria to encourage the desired landscape image. Goals A. To articulate and reinforce architectural elevations and development of a high-quality community. B. Development of a cohesive sense of identity for the community. C. Landscape character. Crilerla A. Landscape, hardscape, monumentation, and signage treatments will be coordinated to create a strong design and thematic image for The Village at Lakeshore. B. The landscape theme for The Village at Lakeshore will be an informal and visually attractive landscape image. C. Pedestrian walkways will be provided along streets and within the interior of the development to link major community destinations and provide adequate pedestrian circulation. D. Tree plantings will be used to shade streets, identify special areas (such as common open space and on-site amenities) and to create a strong community identity. E. Water conserving/drought-tolerant plants will be used as a primary component of the planting palette. CominunitV Landscape Plan The Village at Lakeshore community landscape plan (Figure 6-5, Concel)1mal Landscape Plan) has thematic landscape setbacks along all streets and perimeter edges, identifiable community entries and hardscape elements, and definable common and private areas. Conhmunity street scenes consist of front yard and parkway landscaping, including trees, shrubs and turf, and automatic irrigation systems, and pedestrian linkages and hardscape. (See Figure 6-6, Conceptual Lan Lscahe Details.) 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-18 THE VILLAGE, AI' LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO I IMPLEMENT477ON The community landscape plan designates the primary common recreation and open space areas and provide connecting links. The community streets, parkways and planting program unite to promote the desired community image for The Village at Lakeshore. Communiti, Entries Two (2) community entries will serve The Village at Lakeshore, one from Riverside Drive (State Route 741) to the south (Figure 6-6, Conceptual Landscape Details and Figure 6-7, Entries and Streetscape Landscape Plan), and one from Grand Avenue to the east. The community entries serve as distinctive gateways into the community. Large specimen trees (36 -inch box) will be placed at these entrances to provide a sense of identify and arrival, and to reinforce the community's architectural imagery and boundaries. The Community entires will reflect the architecture of The Village at Lakeshore by the following elements: A. The community entries will include designated landscape space beyond the street right-of-way which have adequate size for entry monuments and thematic landscaping. B. The entry landscape will incorporate deciduous and other accent trees, shrubs and groundcover, with the minimum use of turf. C. Entry monuments will be constructed of stone, river rock or brick consistent with detailing of the architectural styles. D. Entry treatments will include decorative hardscape and paving materials to reinforce the sense of arrival and gateway into the community. 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING Gimp 11 6-I9 anN.IAVGNva'.) . W rr O U) m W LLv m¢ m Q o W ) Q Jco ro J o U W LLJ o = I i �I'II a a IH II: i y N V N ply � IN M y U) LU W m Y L Q u, J m � Q a W m U UJ � J ro J J ro � W C U I— m w 0 (6 Cl) °' W �Y 1 Q J -n anv w.ws w iV m w 0 (6 Cl) °' W �Y 1 Q J \� a® R � . . . �~ - � ; . /rl �e »3 :± 22 (_j $w 2< m± 72 2< J zii �s rn WM LL rr c O LL l=lI^ N vJ LLI �v N � J ¢`Q o W N0 N J m to M THE VILLAGE-' AT LAKESI LORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPLL>< EMAT1ON Street and Parkways The landscape character ofthe streets and parkways are to reinforce The Village at Lakeshore image. All street trees are to be planted in informal patterns, with greater density of trees wherever screening of side or rear yards of residential homes is deemed necessary. All streets will have street trees of a minimum of 24 -inch box and selected from the community plant palette approved by the city. All areas between the streets and the residential homes and/or fences, including parkways, auto -courts, and front yards, will be considered common area and will be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA). All residential homes will have a private yard area enclosed by a wall or fence, and screened from the streets. Communilt, Walls Solid Wall: A community theme wall, which will also serve as a sound wall, will be located along Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, and the property boundaries, creating and reinforcing the community character, providing for privacy and noise control within the community. The community theme walls will be constructed of decorative masonry slump block with a cap. At 50 -foot intervals along the community theme wall or at changes in the wall's vertical or horizontal direction, a pilaster of decorative ledge stone will be constructed. The community theme and sound wall will not be less than six (6) feet in height. Adjacent to the community theme walls along Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue will be a landscape space to provide for visual softening of the solid block wall. This landscaping space will be a minimum of four (4) feet in width. Landscaping in this space will include a selection of trees, shrubs, groundcover and flowering vines that offers variety of color and plant material. View Fence: A steel picket or wrought iron view fence will be located around the swimming pool which will be located within the community recreation area. Additionally, where appropriate for safety and security, other common open space areas; easements and retention areas may be fenced with the view fence. The view fences will not exceed six (6) feet in height. Chain-link fencing may not be used as view fencing. 11 PARADIGM FNGINITRING G200P 11 6-25 THF VILLAGE AT LAKESI TORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I IMPLEb9ENTi1TION Wood/Vinyl Fence: A wood/vinyl fence will be located along private rear and side yards to provide privacy for individual hmneowners. The fence will consist of wood -wrapped steel posts and pressured treated wood which is finished with a solid body stain to prevent weathering and discoloration. The fences should be a minimum five (5) feet and not greater than six (6) feet in height. Co»zm1 11ih) Plant Palettes 'rhe following plant materials, including trees, shrubs, vines, groundcovers, and turf, may be used to create the desired landscape character for The Village at Lakeshore. These plants are consistent with the drought tolerant/water conserving objectives previously established in this section. The number and size of the plant materials will be consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore standards. 11 PARADIGM BNGINTFTRING Gsour 11 6-26 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPLEMENT,] TION Table 6-2, Plant Material list Botanical Name Common Name Trees - Deciduous Phoenix canariensis �AlbiziajulibrissinSilk j Alnus cordata Alnus rhombifolia Mimosa Italian Alder White Alder Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree Fraximu velutma 'Mndeeln Modesto Ash Jacaranda acutifolia Koelreuteria bipinnata Jacaranda Chinese Flame Tree Koelreuteria panniculata Golden Rain Tree Liquidambar styaciflua American Sweet Gum Malus floribunda Japanese Crabapple Populus femontii Freemont Cottonwood Fraxinus uhdei Tomlinson' Pyrus callerana Tomlinson Ash European Pear Pyrus kawakamii _- - — Pistacia chinesis Ornamental Pear - - -- Chinese Pistache Ilatanus acerifolia London Plane'Free latanus Iacemosa California Sycamore Prunus cerasifera Robmma ambigua Idahoensis Purple Leaf Plum Idaho Locust Salix Baylonica Weeping Willow Botanical Name Common Name Palms t Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date Palm Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Washingonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING,; Gi(oUP 11 6-27 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I IMPLLA4ENIf1T101V Botanical Name Common Name Shrubs _ Abelia - "Edward Goucher" Edward Goucher Abelia Acacia Longifolius Barberry Acacia redolens Sidney Golden Wattle Agave spp Agave Aloe spp Aloe Berberis species -- ----- N.C.N Camellia species Camellia Cistus spp Rock Rose Cotoneaster species Cotoneaster Elaegnus pungens Silver Berry Euonymus Japonica Evergreen Hetermmeles arbutifolia Toyon — -- Lavendula spp --- - ------.......... Lavender Leptospermum scoparium New Zealand Tea Tree Ligustrum japonicum Japanese Privet Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo Nerium oleander Oleander osmanthus fragrans Sweet Olive Phominum tenax Flax -- — - -------- -- Photinia fi-aseri - - Photinia Pittosporum tobi r species Mock Orange Plumbago auriculata Cape Plumbago Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine Prunus carolimana 'Bright n Tight' Carolina Laurel Prunus ilicifolia Cherry Hollyleaf Pyrancantha Species Cherry Firethorn Raphiolepis indica species Pint: Indian Hawthorn Salvia Greggii Autumn Sage Salvia lucantha Mexican Brush Sage Viburnum tinus Lauretinus Spring Bouguet Xylosma Congestum N.C.N 11 PARADIGM ENGINrP.RING GROUP 11 6-28 THF, VILLAGE—AT L.AKESIiORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IAJPLFMF'N7ATION Yucca spp Yucca Botanical Name Common Name — Sub Shrubs Agapanthus afi•icanus Lily -of -the -Nile Arctostaphylos species Manzanita Hemerocallis species Day Lily Lonicerajaponica hall's Honeysuckle Moraea bicolor Fortnight Lily Tracheolospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine Vines / Espaliers Calllandla inequilatera Pink Powder Puff Doxantha unguis-cati Cat's Claw Vine L pumila Creeping Fig LFicwus aa Star Vine mium sempervii Carolina Jasmine �Jasminuui polyanthum N.C.N Partlmiociscus tricuspidada Boston Ivy Wisteria floribunda Wisteris Groundcovers Baccharis pilularis'Twin Peaks' Coyote Brush Festuca ovina glauca' Blue Fescue Fragaria chiloensis Gazama Gazama species Gazania Limonrum perezii Statice Lonicerajaponica Honeysuckle Mulenbergia rigens Deer Grass Optunia robusta Optunia Potentilia verna Spring cinquefoil Rosemarius offrcinialis Rosemary Senicio mandraliscac Scnecio Verbina spp Vrebina Note: Some of the plants will frccic in unproteucd exposure Urea, but wjII genclilIIy rejuvenate Gram undmnaged purls. Use with caution. I 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-29 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.I IMPLEMENTATION Table 6-3, Specific Plan Development Standards & Design Guidelines Reference Matrix Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance Definitions X Accessory Uses & Structures X Lot Area & Width X Density/I'AR X Setbacks X Lot Coverage X Building ILeight X Parking X Yard Encroachments X Architectural Style & Design Guidelines Dwelling Unit Size X X Open Space X Fences & Walls X X Signs X Design Review Procedures X Street Standards X Note: Fence, Wall and Sign design guidelinesspecilied within the specific Plan document under section 0.2.4. 6.3.PHASING Implementation of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will require improvements to circulation, drainage, water, sewer, and utility infrastructure. The Village at Lakeshore project development will be developed in a single phase. Development will consist of the entire projectsite, and will include the completion of the frontage improvements, site grading, and construction of on-site sewer, water and drainage facilities. 6.4. FINANCING/MAINTENANCE PLAN Implementation and long term maintenance of improvements within the Specific Plan are important considerations to ensure a successful development. Table 6-4, Financing and Mainlenance Plan, 11 PARADIGM ENGINFTJZING GROUP 11 6-30 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESI LORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1 IMPLFMFNTATION identities the types of improvements anticipated to implement the Specific Plan, the party(s) responsible for constructing the improvements, the probable type and responsibility for funding the improvement's, and responsibility for operation and maintenance of the improvements. The financing plan is intended to ensure the long-term maintenance of the improvements. A variety of financing mechanisms may be utilized in the project. A final decision on what financing mechanism will be used for any single type of improvement will be made prior to initiation ofthat improvement. For that reason, Table 6-4, Financing and Maintenance Plan identifies the probable financing/funding alternatives which will be considered. Table 6-4, Financing and Maintenance Plan x'17 -IE VILLAGP. A'I' LAKESHORF COMMUNITY FOO FIXED COSTS COMMI N I'S 101 Property Taxes UO All propcu} taxes are segregated to the owners RE: tax bills. 102 Corporation Franchise taxes I -FOA t 103 Insurance (attach proposal) I-IOA Covers building properly, liability, D&O t coverage's. 104 Local License & Inspection Fees 1-IOA Covers backflow device testing. 200 OPFR/VrING COSTS _ _ _ 201 Flechicity (attach wadcshca) HOA Covers landscape, building, street lights and gale/pool/spa motors. 202 GIs (attach worksheet) HOA 203 W arca (attach worksheet) HOA Covers landscape only -AFI units will be individually metered. 204 Sewer/Septic Tanks HOA 205 Cable'PV/Master Ancona UO Buildings prewired Cor cable. Unit Owner contracts directly with provider. 206 Custodial Area: Number of Resu coots HOA Covlasianalomial scrvioe of pool area restroom building. 207 Landscape Area HOA I IOA to maintain all landscaping except for areas within Unit Owner's exCILI51Ve use common arca. 208 Refuse Disposal IJo Individual hash cans billed directly to each Unit Owner: 209 Private Sheets, Driveways, and Walkways & FICA HOA to maintain all s'h'eet sw faces and Area Outside ROW common svalkwNm s. 210 1 -Fearing & Air Conditioning Maintenance Area UO 1-IVAC units located with Unit Owner's exclusive use common aI'ea. 211 Swin ruing Pool & Fountain Maintenance: I IOA Weekly maintenance provided by pool Number of Pools: I maintenance vendor. 212 Access Canlrol HOA IIOA to maintain 2 sets of double swinging No. of motorized gates: 2 gates 11 PARADIGMHNGINHERINGGROUP 11 6-31 THE VILLAGE AFLAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. I IA41JLI3AIFN7A TION '1111, VILLAGE /VI'I,AKI-SIIOR I COMMUNITY OPITNI IN(i COS'l S COMMENTS 213 No. of Inmeoms/lelephone hilly IIOA 110A to mimitain 2 telephone access control SyStcnls. 214 Reserve Study IIOA HOA toli,el)atcasttici),(,I'the icwiN,e requirements every 3years. 215 Miscellaneous Minor Repairs (i. c. graffiti t e in ova 1) IIOA Covets miscellaneous repairs to Comilloll area Components Pest Coullol llOA/tJO HOA to provide pest control scivice for exterior, Una Owner's interior. Light Maintenance Service and Supplies IIOA MOA to maintain common arca lighting and building lights on house panels. Storm Dmin Films IIOA IIOA to maintain storm drain filter HOA to maintain piiv sewer line (outside of'RO W) Private Saner Line Maintenance IlOA Roof and Rain Outlet Inspections and Maintenance 1 -TOA HOA to maintain tooling. deck waterproofing and gutters. Pile Sprinkler & Alarm Systems HOA IIOA toiiiaititaiiilire sprinkler and al,,iiiii systems II)equmed. Common Area Inspections IIOA IIOA to annually inspect common areas and adjust maintenance if necessary. 300 RESERVES 301 Ilmnit Buildings: SLUCCO HOA 302 Paint Buildings Misc. him/Metals: 10'/,� HOA ll=()3-- Rool'-Type: Concrete file HOA 1304 Exterior Lights BOA i j 305 Sticets & Di ivcs: Asphalt IIOA ,306 Pool Re -Plaster ITOA 307 Pool Hester IIOA IN Pool Filler IIOA 309 Pool/spa Pumps IIOA 1310 Dcck Sill face HOA 311 Block Walls: (Paint) IIOA I IOA to maintain block Nvidk facing common arca including perimeter walls, 312 Block Walls: (Repair) IIOA 313 Wood/Vinyl Fencing: (Paint) IlOA f1 115 Wood/Vinyl Fencing: (Repair) Metal Fencing: (Paint) 110A 110A 316 Metal Fencing: (Repair) IIOA 117 Common Arte Dors IIOA 318 Fire Sprinklers: s 5 Year Cert, HOA 11 PARAJ)IGNl ENGINEERING GROUP 11 6-32 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESIIORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.] IMPLEMENTATION "I IIE VILLAGE ATLAKESHORF COMMUNITY ------------ 300 RES11] 319 Motorized Gates 1I0A 320 Access System E10A 321 Landscape Furniture 110A 322 Entry Monuments 110A 323 Miscellaneous Signage HOA 1324 Clustered Mailboxes HOA 325 Tree Trimming HOA_ 326 Irrigation Controllers 110A 327 Landscape Refurbishment/Major Repairs I10A `400 ADMINISTRATION 401 Management (I) HOA HOA to be managed by a professional HOA managemmlit company. 402 Legal Services I 10 403 Accounting HOA 1404 Education HOA HOA to provide opportunities for Board of Directors education. 405 Miscellaneous Office Expense 110A 500 CONEINGENCY 501 New Consuvetion +I-3% HOA HOA's budget to reflect a 3% contingency, Note [I]: Unit Owner 6.5. ADJUSTMENTS AND REVISIONS The Specific Plan may be amended in the saine manner as a General Plan, except that a specific plan amendment may be adopted by resolution or ordinance consistent with the manner of adoption of the specific plan. It may also be amended as often as deemed necessary by the City Council. Specific Plan amendments shall be consistent with the General Plan. Once the proposed amendment has been submitted to the City, City staffshall review the application for completeness, and then issue a notice of the upcoming public hearing. Staff shall prepare a staff report with recommendations on the amendment and forward it to the Planning Commission for consideration and action to pass their own recommendation on to the City Council for final action on the request. 11 PARADIGM ENGINELIUNG GROUP 11 6-33 7.0 References The Pillage al Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, Cily of Lake Elsinore, California 11 PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 11 THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMFNTNO I REI, It 7.0 REFERENCES The following documents were referenced as general information sources during the preparation of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. All reference documents are the property of Sunwood Lakeview, LLC. A. Air pualityIbzapaciAnalysis, Webb Associates, February 2005. B. Acoustical Inzpact Analysis, Webb Associates, February 2005. C. Tr(t1 is Impact Report, Webb Associates, January 2005. Revision of Traf e Impact Report conducted by VA Consulting, July 2014. D. Phase I E17V%rO[M7eI9Ia1 Site Assessment for Tomlinson Property, Southern California Geotechnical, November 2004. E. Hislorical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, CRM TECH, October 2004. F. Foull Sludv for Tomlinson Property, Southern California Geotechnical, August 2004. G. Geoiechiiiceil hwestigcilion for Toivzliivson Properly, Southern California Geotechnical, July 2004. H. Preliminary Emwronmental Due Diligence,for the Tomlinson Property, Michael Brandman Associates, June 2004. 7-1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Addendum 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: The Village at Lakeshore SCH 92006071027 City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Justin Kirk, Senior Planner (951) 674-3124 Ext 284 The Village at Lakeshore project consists of 19.71 acres located in the western portion of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. The site is located on the northeast corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (Highway 74) northwest of Lake Elsinore. Regional access is provided by Interstate 15 and highway 74. The site is generally bounded by Lakeside High School to the north; vacant land to the northwest; apartments to the west; single-family homes and storage to the southwest; vacant land to the south; and mobile homes to the east. Refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Map; and Exhibit 2, Aerial Map. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Sunwood Lakeview, LLC 9740 Appaloosa Drive, Suite 130 San Diego, CA 92131 6. General Plan Designation(s): 7. Zoning Designation(s): 8. Project Description: Prqject Histo -17 Specific Plan - Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan — Villages at Lakeshore See below. In September 2006, the 146 multifamily residential Village at Lakeshore project was approved by the City of Lake Elsinore on the 19.71 acre site, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was adopted (SCH 2006071027). The project site location is shown in Exhibits 1 and 2. The project was approved by the Planning Commission on August The Village at Lakeshore 1 Templeton Planning Group Initial SIu0y/Mltlgated Negafivo Oeolaration April, 2015 15, 2006 and by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The following Planning cases were approved/adopted: • Tentative Parcel Map 33267 • Specific Plan 2005-1 (SP 2005-1) • Zone Change 2005-1 (Z('2005-1 • Conditional Use Permit 2005-1 • Design Review R2005-09 (DRR2005-09) • Mitigated Negative Declaration SC11200671027 Previous Pro.ject Description The previously approved project consists of 146 medium density (2 story) attached multifamily residential units, pool with recreation area, a storage area and a storm water quality/detention basin on the 19.71 acre site. The project was designed to accommodate an onsite trace of the Elsinore fault, including appropriate dwelling unit setbacks. The recreation area, open space, and RV/boat storage areas are located in the fault setback zone. The units were attached and clustered into groups of four (4) units surrounding a central driveway with two access points: primary access off of Riverside Drive (Highway 74) to the east and the secondary entrance off of Grand Avenue to the southwest. Tentative Parcel Map 33267 was approved as a one lot condominium map. The previously approved project is depicted in Exhibit 3, Approved Site Plan. Current Project Description In November 2014, a revised site plan / Tentative Parcel Map was prepared and submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department for review. Although some site plan and residential product design changes were made, the overall layout of the project, including the fault setback area, development areas, onsite circulation and primary/secondary access points has not substantially changed. The primary difference in the revised site plan is the proposed residential land uses are now two (2) separate single family detached product types and total 163 units. Product type 1 is a two story single family detached residential unit with alley -load garage access, with units fronting on shared green space. Product type 2 is a single family detached residential unit, grouped into sets of four (4) units surrounding a centralized driveway. Product type I is proposed for the internal central area of the project site and product type 2 is located around the perimeter of the site. The layout of the pool/recreation area has been slightly modified to allow for a larger pool, and the previously proposed storage RV/boat storage area has been removed and has been replaced with a hard court recreation and play area. The revised site plan represents a 12% increase in residential units. The primary prgject access points, onsite circulation system, recreation area, open space, and drainage improvements are in substantial conformance with the previously approved site plan. The Village al Lakeshore 2 Templeton Planning Group Initial Stiky/MI[igated Negative Declaration April, 2015 A community recreation center with pool and spa is maintained in the new plan, consistent with the old plan. The recreation center is centrally located between the primary entrance and the park. Entitlement requirements or the revised site plan only included a revised Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 33267) and Design Review. The proposed site plan is shown in Exhibit 4. The Village at Lakeshore 3 Templeton Planning Group Initial SWtly,Mnigalea Negative Declaration April, 2015 EXH I REGIONAL MAP 8 March Air Ilt serve Base JpWid Game j ft,aWlg Area L9ike Peu 5 $late riecrentrot Area Nuevo Pems- ;;ni pa) Ilomeland 'L Winchester 1 tirbuCo Can/or. o Santa garita oto De Gaza Ronald W Gaspers 4Yd demess Pack RIVI SAN` Wiluomat MUrneta TEMPLETON VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE - 1AKI ELSINORE. CA M 0 m 2 0m1 5.0 ml v ,c, sur rip PREPARED FOR: PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 03-31-2015 E x» 2 AERIAL MAP M PE. -.F "" OF1i0it 500 ft ,.000 it VILLAGE Al- LAKESHORG LAKE ELSINORE, CA - PREPARED 1=0R: PARADIGM ENGINEERING GROUP 03-31-2015 Exii 3 APPROVED SITE P i,AN TEMPS -ETON VILLAGE AT LAKES] ORE - LAKE LLSINORF, CA NTS NI „a1)i,� - PREPARED 1=0R: PARADK;M ENGINEERING GROUP 0331-2015 EXI1 4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN iE '€P ETON VILLAGE AT LAKESIIORE - LAKE ELSINORE, CANIS EP PRARED FOR: PARADIGM LNGINEGRING GROUP 03-31-2015 Previous Cali/brnia Environmental Quality, Act (CEQA) Documentation On September 12, 2006, the Village at Lakeshore project was approved by the City of Lake Elsinore, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was adopted (SCH 2006071027). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was also approved along with the MND. The following technical studies were completed as part of the adopted MND, and their status for this Initial Study Addendum is summarized in Table 1: Table 1 Mitigated Negative Declaration Technical Study Summary Technical Study Completed By Updated or Deemed Adequate AIR QUALITY STUDY Albert A. Webb Engineering Letter Update Deemed Consultants, 09/25/05 Adequate BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Michael Brandman Associates, STUDY 03/08/05 Letter Update Deemed Adequate CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION/ S1318 CRM Tech, 10/14/04 Deemed Adequate by City TRIBAL CONSULTATION GEOTECHNICAL Southern California Southern California REPORT/FAULT STUDY Geotechnical Inc., 07/28/04 Geotechnical, Inc., Updated 04.14.15 GREENHOUSE GAS Not previously prepared Compliant with Climate ASSESSMENT Action Plan PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL Southern California Existing Study Deemed Geotechnical Inc., 11/04/04 Adequate HYDROLOGY STUDY Albert A. Webb Engineering VA Consultants, Updated Consultants, 2005 12/01/13 NOISE STUDY Albert A. Webb Engineering Giroux & Associates, Updated Consultants, 05/03/06 02/25/15 MSHCP CONSISTENCY Michael Brandman Associates, Letter Update Deemed REPORT 06/02/06 Adequate VA Consulting, Inc., Albert A. VA Consultants, Updated TRAFFIC STUDY Webb Engineering Consultants, 07/28/14 10/12/05 WATER QUALITY Albert A. Webb Engineering VA Consultants, Updated MANAGEMENT PLAN Consultants, 10/05 02/15 The previously adopted Expanded Initial Study / MND and the above summarized technical studies and letter updates are included in the Appendix to this Initial Study Addendum. The Village at Lakeshore 8 Templet n Planning Group Initial SWtly/Mitigated Negative Declaration April Current CEQA Documentation and Review The revised project is evaluated in this Initial Study Addendum to determine if the previously adopted MND in 2006 adequately covers the current project design and environmental considerations for CEQA compliance purposes. Since 2006, there have been several changes to the CEQA Statute and the CEQA Guidelines that require additional or expanded analysis, including the assessment of greenhouse gasses and associated climate change. Since the adoption of the MND, there have been also been additional planning and CEQA requirements (RWQCB MS -4 Permit) for storm water quality and drainage, that were not in effect at the time that the previous MND was adopted. In addition, the city's General Plan and Climate Action Plan have been prepared and adopted (December , 2011) since the MND was adopted to address climate change and greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Projects that are deemed to be in compliance with the local implementing measures in the Climate Action Plan, will not result in significant GHG impacts. The previously prepared technical studies prepared for the adopted MND have been reviewed/updated to reflect the current project, CEQA requirements and environmental conditions. This Initial Study incorporates the analysis contained in the previously adopted MND for each environmental factor by reference and includes updated environmental baseline, impact and mitigation measure information where warranted. Additional mitigation measures beyond those contained in the Adopted MND may be warranted to reduce year 2015 impacts to less than significant levels. If required, these additional mitigation measures are clearly spelled out in each section of the Initial Study. The Initial Study checldist has been structured to determine the following for the proposed prgject in comparison to the previous project that was evaluated in the adopted MND, for each environmental factor previously evaluated: • New significant impact • More severe significant impact • New ability to substantially reduce significant impacts • No substantial change,from previous analysis A detailed discussion follows each of the environmental checklist items to provide justification for the box checked, and to demonstrate that all impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels. The VAlage at Lakeshore 9 Templemn Planning Group Initlal StWylMltigated NepkwN Geclaralion Aprll, 2015 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The proposed project could potentially affect the environmental factor(s) checked below. With mitigation, effects to these resources would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. The following pages present a more detailed checklist and discussion of each environmental factor. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Air Quality ® Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Geology, Soils and Seismicity ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Land Use and Land Use Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ® Noise ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ® Transportation and Traffic ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial study: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and aNEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impacf, or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document Pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmcnt, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier E1R or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, no further enviromnental documentation is required. Signature Printed Name The Village at Lakeshore t o Initial StudylMilieated Negative Oeclarelion Date For Tamplebn Planning Group April, 2016 Environmental Checklist Aesthetics In review of the previous analysis this determination appears to be in error, as the site is not designated as a scenic resource under the General Plan Community Design Element in place at the time. Further, the updated General Plan that was completed after the previously adopted MND does not identify the site as a scenic resource. The adopted mitigation measures remain adequate. Mitigation Measures 1.1 and 1.2, on Page 5-5 of the adopted MND are included in the appendix. While the proposed redesigned buildings exceed the previously assessed building heights of 18'-0" by a maximum of 6'-5", the overall impact is not significant enough to warrant mitigation, as existing two story homes are adjacent to the northeast and northwest of the project site that exceed the maximum building height of the proposed project. Other baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are generally consistent with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 2006071027). Therefore no additional analysis is warranted and no new mitigation measures are required. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. b -c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SO 2006071027) found that the proposed project would result in a less than significant impacts. Baseline environmental conditions inclusive of scenic resources remain similar to those described in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI I The VOlege at Lakeshore 11 Templebn Planning Group Initial StutlyWirgeled Negative nedetallon ApnI 2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant SevereSignificant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 1. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, L1 El but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 1:1 L1 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare El E which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Discussion a) The previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified that proposed prgject would have less than significant adverse impacts with mitigation incorporated. In review of the previous analysis this determination appears to be in error, as the site is not designated as a scenic resource under the General Plan Community Design Element in place at the time. Further, the updated General Plan that was completed after the previously adopted MND does not identify the site as a scenic resource. The adopted mitigation measures remain adequate. Mitigation Measures 1.1 and 1.2, on Page 5-5 of the adopted MND are included in the appendix. While the proposed redesigned buildings exceed the previously assessed building heights of 18'-0" by a maximum of 6'-5", the overall impact is not significant enough to warrant mitigation, as existing two story homes are adjacent to the northeast and northwest of the project site that exceed the maximum building height of the proposed project. Other baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are generally consistent with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 2006071027). Therefore no additional analysis is warranted and no new mitigation measures are required. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. b -c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SO 2006071027) found that the proposed project would result in a less than significant impacts. Baseline environmental conditions inclusive of scenic resources remain similar to those described in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI I The VOlege at Lakeshore 11 Templebn Planning Group Initial StutlyWirgeled Negative nedetallon ApnI 2015 2006071027). Furthermore no new regulatory requirements are in place to warrant further analysis. While the proposed project has been significantly updated, the same level of high quality architectural guidelines have been incorporated to provide for a distinctive visual environment that helps to establish a conn unity identity. The proposed project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are generally consistent with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCII 2006071027). Therefore no additional analysis is warranted. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. d) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified significant adverse impacts that were mitigated to less than significant. Even so, the adopted mitigation measures remain in place. Mitigation Measures 1.1 and 1.2, on Page 5-5 contained in the adopted MND remain adequate and are included in the appendix. In review of the modified proposed project, the previously incorporated mitigation would still remain adequate and effective to ensure that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts that are not mitigated. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site lighting is substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted . Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Agricultural and Forest Resources New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? G) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? The Village at Lakeul 12 Templemn Planning Group Initial SrudylMltat ed Negative Declaration April 2015 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Discussion a -c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact to agricultural resources and remains adequate for the currently proposed project. While the proposed project was historically used for agricultural uses, these uses have been abandoned since 1992 and have not resumed in the interim period of time between the previously approved Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) and the current analysis. Due to no new agricultural uses there is no substantial change from the previous analysis. Therefore no additional analysis is warranted or required. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Air Quality Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 3. AIRQUALITY— New Ability to No New Ability to No New More Reduce Change From Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Impact Impact Impact Analysis ❑ ❑ ❑ a -c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact to agricultural resources and remains adequate for the currently proposed project. While the proposed project was historically used for agricultural uses, these uses have been abandoned since 1992 and have not resumed in the interim period of time between the previously approved Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) and the current analysis. Due to no new agricultural uses there is no substantial change from the previous analysis. Therefore no additional analysis is warranted or required. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Air Quality Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 3. AIRQUALITY— New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant SevereSignificant Previous Impact Impact Impact Analysis applicable air quality plan? Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑ ❑ ❑ any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ number of people? Discussion An updated letter report was prepared to analyze the potential impacts to air quality resulting from the revised project and was used in the preparation of this section. The letter update is included in the appendix and concludes that the emissions associated with the currently proposed project are similar to the those associated with the previously evaluated project, as the proposed land uses and intensity are substantially the same, as included in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND. Greenhouse gasses are discussed in a separate section of this Initial Study. The Wrap at Lakeshore 13 Templeton Planning Group Initial 5tudylMttlgaled Negelive Declaration April, 2015 a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous air quality analysis remains adequate, as the proposed project, is consistent with the General Plan land use element, upon which the acceptable AQMP emissions levels are based. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. J) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. Please refer to Page 5-14 of the adopted MND for Mitigation Measure 3-1. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous air quality analysis remains adequate, as the proposed project, is consistent with the General Plan land use element, upon which the acceptable AQMP emissions levels are based. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the Project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. c, d, e) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous air quality analysis remains adequate, as the proposed project, is consistent with the General Plan land use element, upon which the acceptable AQMP emissions levels are based. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The Village at Lakeshore 14 Templeton Plannlnq Omup Initial SwtlylM169alad NegatYe Deolaraartn April. 2015 Biological Resources New Atilityto No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact pnpact bnpact Analysis 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or El ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? L) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ ❑ ❑ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ❑ native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances El ❑ protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion A biological resources assessment was previously prepared by MBA on 06/02/06 and an MSHCP conformance report was prepared by MBA on 03/08/05. An updated letter report has been prepared to analyze the potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the revised project, was used in the preparation of this section, and is included in the appendix to this Initial Study. The letter update concludes that the onsite biological resources are similar to those documented in the previous biological assessment. The biological resources present on the project site are limited and have not substantially changed since the previous biological assessment and MSHCP consistency reports were prepared. The analysis contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) remains adequate for the currently proposed project. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study. No additional analysis is warranted or required. 'rhe Village at Lakeshore 15 Templeen planning Group Initial SWtlylMitigatetl Negative Declaation April 2015 a, d, f) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact, with mitigation. Mitigation measure 4.1 on Page 5-19 of the adopted MND wil reduced impacts to less than significant.. The previous biological resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. b) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. In review of the modified Proposed project, the previous biological resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. The previous biological resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Cultural Resources Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): S. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? T he Village at Lakeshore 16 Ten lolon Planning Group Initial StudylMllleated Negative, Grc2laton Apul 2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Impact impact Impact Analysis T he Village at Lakeshore 16 Ten lolon Planning Group Initial StudylMllleated Negative, Grc2laton Apul 2015 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared by CRM Tech in October, 2004 for the previously proposed residential development of the project site. The Cultural Resources Assessment has been determined to be adequate for the currently proposed project as site conditions have not changed. The adopted Expanded Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration included a Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report. This report found that no "historical resources," as defined by CFQA, are in existence within the project area. This was largely due to earthmoving activities that have disturbed the landscape beyond recognition of its native landscape. Further, the ground cover is very sparse, and the terrain is level mostly as a result of mechanical leveling in the past. SB 18 Tribal Consultation was conducted as part of the original Environmental Review. This consultation included letters being sent to all Tribes that were recommended by the Native American Heritage Commission, to which two responded, of which only one Tribe requested consultation. This consultation resulted in the inclusion of mitigation measures to ensure that no unique or irreplaceable cultural resources are disturbed during grading activities. SB 18 Tribal Consultation was further conducted as part of the Environmental Review for the modified project. Letter were sent to all Tribes recommended by the Native American Heritage Commission on September 8, 2014. Two Tribes responded requesting further consultation. This consultation was completed and as a result no additional mitigation measures were requested. Based upon the foregoing analysis, no impacts to cultural impacts beyond what was previously identified and mitigated through previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. The previous cultural resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed and the consulted Native American tribes have not requested any additional mitigation measures. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The village at Lakeshore 17 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dederallon Templeton Plannin8 Gmup April, 2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change Frorn Significant Severe Significant Previous Impact burger Impact Analysis ❑ ❑ ❑ N A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared by CRM Tech in October, 2004 for the previously proposed residential development of the project site. The Cultural Resources Assessment has been determined to be adequate for the currently proposed project as site conditions have not changed. The adopted Expanded Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration included a Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report. This report found that no "historical resources," as defined by CFQA, are in existence within the project area. This was largely due to earthmoving activities that have disturbed the landscape beyond recognition of its native landscape. Further, the ground cover is very sparse, and the terrain is level mostly as a result of mechanical leveling in the past. SB 18 Tribal Consultation was conducted as part of the original Environmental Review. This consultation included letters being sent to all Tribes that were recommended by the Native American Heritage Commission, to which two responded, of which only one Tribe requested consultation. This consultation resulted in the inclusion of mitigation measures to ensure that no unique or irreplaceable cultural resources are disturbed during grading activities. SB 18 Tribal Consultation was further conducted as part of the Environmental Review for the modified project. Letter were sent to all Tribes recommended by the Native American Heritage Commission on September 8, 2014. Two Tribes responded requesting further consultation. This consultation was completed and as a result no additional mitigation measures were requested. Based upon the foregoing analysis, no impacts to cultural impacts beyond what was previously identified and mitigated through previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. The previous cultural resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed and the consulted Native American tribes have not requested any additional mitigation measures. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The village at Lakeshore 17 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dederallon Templeton Plannin8 Gmup April, 2015 b, c, d) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact, with mitigation. Mitigation Measures 5.1 and 5.2 on page 5-23 of the adopted MND remain adequate to reduced project impacts to less than significant. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous cultural resource assessment remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The following mitigation measures have been included in the updated cultural rsources assessment to mitigate impacts to less than significant levels. This mitigation measure is in addition to the previously adopted MND mitigation measures. MITIGATIONMEASURES MM -1, Cultural Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County/Lake Elsinore qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. MM -2, Cultural At least 30 days proior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the 'Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the "Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The agreement shall be developed between the Tribe and the Applicant and shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of the professional Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; termsof compensationfor the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacreds sites, and human remains discovered on the site. MM -3, Cultural Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre -grading report with the city (i't' required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation which will be determined in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM -2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and The Village at Lakeshore 18 Templalon Planning Group Ili Sitidy/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2015 redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. MM-4, Cultural If human remains are encountered, California Ilealth and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no ftuthei disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted witin 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately notify the "most likely descendent(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendent(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided for in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM-2. MM-5, Cultural The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultrua (resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate tribe for proper treatment and disposition. MM-6, Cultural All cultural materials, that are collected during the grading monitoring program and from any previous archaeological studies, of excavations on the project site, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and human remains which will be addressed in the Treatment Agreement required in MM-2, shall be tribally coated according to current professional repository standards by the Pechanga Tribe. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to the Pechange "Tribe's curation facility which meets the standards set forth in 36 CFR Part 79 for federal repositories. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. MM-7, Cultural If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discoverd during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe shall assess the significsnce of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Pulic Resource Code Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the tribe cannot agree on the significance for such resources or The Village at Lakesliore 9 Templeton Pla ming Group 1itral SWd,/Wiggled Negatea Dedatalioa April, 2015 the mitigation for such resources, these issues shall be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or the City Council. Geology, Soils, and Seismicity The project site has undergone nulltiple geotechnical investigations, the most recent of which was in July 2004 (Social Geotechnical). An updated geotechncial evaluation was completed on April 14, 2015 to evaluate the currently proposed project. The discussion of seismic and soils issues inth epl ions studuoes remain relevant, as there hase been no significant changes to the project site or immediate vicinity since 2004, which would impact seismic or soils conditions on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. The project site plen continues to include a 50 foot fault setback zone on each side of the previously mapped faults to mitigate grOundrupture impacts The Village at Lakeshore 20 1 sinplelon Planning Group Initial Swdy/Mltigaled Negative Declarzlion April. 201h New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Impact Severe Impact Significant Impact Previous Analysis 6. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY— Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ 0 delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? El F in) Seisinic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? El N c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ❑ ❑ Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ ❑ ❑ of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Discussion The project site has undergone nulltiple geotechnical investigations, the most recent of which was in July 2004 (Social Geotechnical). An updated geotechncial evaluation was completed on April 14, 2015 to evaluate the currently proposed project. The discussion of seismic and soils issues inth epl ions studuoes remain relevant, as there hase been no significant changes to the project site or immediate vicinity since 2004, which would impact seismic or soils conditions on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. The project site plen continues to include a 50 foot fault setback zone on each side of the previously mapped faults to mitigate grOundrupture impacts The Village at Lakeshore 20 1 sinplelon Planning Group Initial Swdy/Mltigaled Negative Declarzlion April. 201h assocoiate with a seisminc event along this identified fault zone. Additional information and design recommendations regarding liquefaction are contained in the updated geotechnical study and these recommendation have been structured as additional mitigation measures. a, c, d) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 2006071027) identified a less than significant ilopact to fault ruptue, groundshaking, liquefaction and/or landslides with mitigation. Mitigation Measures 6.1 and 6.2 on page 5-30 of the adopted MND remain adequate to reduced project impacts to less than significant. The previous geotechnical evaluation remain adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed, and has been augmented by the update geotechnical assessment. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . The following additional mitigation measure is warranted, and I along with the previously adopted mitigation measures, reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measure has been included in the updated geotechnical assessment to mitigate liquefaction impacts to less than significant levels. This mitigation measure is in addition to the previously adopted MND mitigation measures. MM -1, Geology, Soils & Seismicity: Remedial grading shall be completed witnin the building pad areas to remove the existing fill and near-SOrface, variable strength, collapsible alluvium and replace these materials as compacted structural fill. The upper portion of the native soils within the proposed building areas shall be removed to a depth of at least 6 feet below the existing site grades. In order to provide a uniform subgrade for support of the proposed buildings, overexcavation shall extend to a depth of at least 6 feet below the proposed building pad subgrade elevations. Deeper removals of unsuitable soils may be necessary where loose, moderately porous, alluvial soils are encountered. The overexcavation areas shall extend at least 5 feet beyond the building and foundation perimeters and to an extent equal to the depth of fill below the foundation. Following completion of the overexcavation, the subgrade soils within the building areas shall be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer to verify their suitability to serve as the structural fill subgrade, as well as to Support the foundation loads of the new structures. b) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 1 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous geotechnical evaluation remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 1'tie Village at I ake5110te 21 1 an, lelon Planning Group Initial SlodylMingated Negative Declaration April, 2015 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. e) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. In review of the modified proposed project, the previous geotechnical evaluation remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Greenhouse Gas Emissions a) Generale greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ❑ ® 0 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discussion. A greenhouse gas emissions assessment was not completed for the adopted MND as AB 32 had only recently been enacted and there was no guidance available on required the approach to analysis and no established significance thresholds. Since that time, there have been methodologies and significance thresholds adopted for greenhouse gasses. In addition to address AB 32 requirements and to achieve state mandated greenhouse gas reduction goals, the City of Lake Elsinore prepared and adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) on December 13, 2011. Projects that are deemed in compliance with the greenhouse gas reduction measures contained in the CAP are determined to have less than significant impacts on greenhouse gasses and climate change. Project related greenhouse gas emissions are summarized in the appendix of this Initival Study Addendum. a,b) The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted a Climate Action Plan that requires a 22.3 percent reduction in GI G emissions per service population between years 2008 and 2020. These efficiency -based targets were derived by dividing the statewide Assembly Bill (AB) 32 targeted emissions levels for 2020 and statewide Executive Order S-3-05 targeted emissions level for 2030 by the 2020 and 2030 statewide service population respectively. 9 22 Templelo i Planning Group I he Village al Lakeshore Inlllal SlueylMitigaled r ltve Ded,ii-Mcn April, 2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS— Would the project: a) Generale greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ❑ ® 0 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discussion. A greenhouse gas emissions assessment was not completed for the adopted MND as AB 32 had only recently been enacted and there was no guidance available on required the approach to analysis and no established significance thresholds. Since that time, there have been methodologies and significance thresholds adopted for greenhouse gasses. In addition to address AB 32 requirements and to achieve state mandated greenhouse gas reduction goals, the City of Lake Elsinore prepared and adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) on December 13, 2011. Projects that are deemed in compliance with the greenhouse gas reduction measures contained in the CAP are determined to have less than significant impacts on greenhouse gasses and climate change. Project related greenhouse gas emissions are summarized in the appendix of this Initival Study Addendum. a,b) The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted a Climate Action Plan that requires a 22.3 percent reduction in GI G emissions per service population between years 2008 and 2020. These efficiency -based targets were derived by dividing the statewide Assembly Bill (AB) 32 targeted emissions levels for 2020 and statewide Executive Order S-3-05 targeted emissions level for 2030 by the 2020 and 2030 statewide service population respectively. 9 22 Templelo i Planning Group I he Village al Lakeshore Inlllal SlueylMitigaled r ltve Ded,ii-Mcn April, 2015 Thesc targets represent the maximum quantity of emissions each resident and employee in the State of California could emit in 2020 and 2030 based on emissions levels necessary to achieve the statewide AB 32 and Executive Order 5-3-05 GHG emissions reduction goals. The City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan also contains the following GHG-related measures that are applicable to the proposed project: • T-1.1 Safe Routes to School. Continue to pursue and utilize grant funding when needed to construct safe pedestrian and bicycle routes within a two mile radius of schools where applicable • T-1.2 Pedestrian Infrastructure. Through the development review process, require the installation of sidewalks along new and reconstructed streets. Also require new subdivisions and large developments to provide sidewalks or paths to internally link all uses where applicable and provide connections to neighborhood activity centers, major destinations, and transit facilities contiguous with the project site; implement through conditions of approval. • E-1.1 Tree Planting Requirements. Through the development review process, require new development to plant at mininunn one 15 -gallon nondeciduous, mnbrella-form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length near buildings, per the Municipal Code. Trees shall be planted in strategic locations around buildings or to shade pavement in parking lots and streets. • E-13 Energy Efficient Building Standards. Adopt an ordinance requiring that all new construction exceed the California Energy Code requirements, based on the 2008 Energy Efficiency Standards by 15 percent (consistent with Calfireen Tier 1), through either the performance based or prescriptive approach described in the California Green Building Code; implement through conditions of approval. Alternately, a solar photovoltaic system and/or solar water beating may be used to assist in mceting all or a portion of the 15 percent requirement. • T-1.4: Bicycle Infrastructure. Through the developrnent review process, require new development, as applicable, to implement and connect to the network of Class I, Il and III bikeways, trails and safety features identified in the General Plan, Bike Lane Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation plan; implement through conditions of approval. The City will also continue to pursue and utilize funding when needed to implement portions of these plans. • E-4.1 Landscaping Ordinance. Through the development review process, enforce the City's Assembly Bill 1881 Landscaping Ordinance, implement through conditions of approval. • E-4.2 Indoor Water Conservation Requirements. Amend the City's Uniform Building Code to require development projects to reduce indoor water consumption by 30 percent (consistent with CalGreen Tier 1, Section A5303.2.3.1), and implement through conditions of approval. The Village at Lakeshore 23 Templeton Planning Group Initial SWd,/Mitigated Negalivo Declaration April, 2015 MITIGATION MEASURES • Mitigation Measure GHGA: The project applicant shall implement MeaSul'eST-1.1, 1'- 1.2, E-1.1, E-1.3, T-1.4, E-4.1 and E-4.2 contained in the City of lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan. For the purposes of this analysis the proposed project would generate a significant level of GHG emissions and be inconsistent with the Climate Action Plan if the proposed project did not meet the target reduction of at least 22.3 percent between the year 2010 (closest year available to 2008 in CaIEEMod) and 2020. With incorporation of the above outlined CAP measures, the proposed project would reduce GHG emissions to levels required by the adopted CAP and as such would not result in a significant impact. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues land Supporting Information Sources): _Impact Impact Impact Analysis 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste Would the project: within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ El M environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ E b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ E M hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962,5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ M or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ M would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ El El M an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ M injury or death involving wildland fres, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The vtllage at Lakeshore 24 Templeton Planning Group Initial StudylMlllgated Negative Declaration Apnl. 2015 Discussion ']'be proposed project would not involve the routine storage or transport of fuels, lubricants, and various other liquids. Construction related fuel may be transported to the project site on an as - needed basis by equipment service trucks. Materials hazardous to humans, wildlife, and sensitive environments would be present during project construction. These materials include diesel fuel, gasoline, equipment fluids, concrete, cleaning solutions and solvents, lubricant oils, adhesives, human waste, and chemical toilets. a, b, c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 7-1 on Page 5-34 remains adequate, although is not required based on the previous initial Study findings. A review of the modified proposed project, and the previous Phase I ESA have determined that it remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. d -h) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. A review of the modified proposed project, and the previous Phase I ESA have determined that it remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are Substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Hydrology and Water Quality New Ability to New Substantially Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY— Previous Would the project: Analysis a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ discharge requirements? New Ability to No Substantially Substantial More Reduce Change From Severe Significant Previous Impact __„Impact Analysis a The Village at Lakeshore 25 Templeton Planning Group In10el SWdylMfilgated Negative Declaation April. 2015 The previously prepared hydrology and water quality studies Have been updated for the proposed project by VA Consulting (02/15) and are included in the appendix. The proposed onsite drainage and surface water quality system design is similar to that in the approved project with all onsite drainage being conveyed to a detention /water quality basin in the south east corner of the project site. The project design meets all city and RWQCB surface water drainage and water quality requirements. Impact Analysis a,c, d, e, f) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 20061 identified a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation incasure 8.1 — 8.6 on Page 5-42 of the adopted MND remains adequate. A review of the modified proposed project, and the previous hydrology study have determined that it The Village at Lakeshore 26 Templeto t Plann rg Group Initial SWOylMitigatrd NepaGve bad.,W or April 2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Impact Severe Impact Significant Impact Previous Analysis b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ 1 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a El ❑ El N site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site El El El or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed El El El the capacity of existing or planned stonmwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as 1:1 ❑ M mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures ❑ El L1 that would impede or redirect flood flows? d Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ 1 loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Discussion The previously prepared hydrology and water quality studies Have been updated for the proposed project by VA Consulting (02/15) and are included in the appendix. The proposed onsite drainage and surface water quality system design is similar to that in the approved project with all onsite drainage being conveyed to a detention /water quality basin in the south east corner of the project site. The project design meets all city and RWQCB surface water drainage and water quality requirements. Impact Analysis a,c, d, e, f) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 20061 identified a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation incasure 8.1 — 8.6 on Page 5-42 of the adopted MND remains adequate. A review of the modified proposed project, and the previous hydrology study have determined that it The Village at Lakeshore 26 Templeto t Plann rg Group Initial SWOylMitigatrd NepaGve bad.,W or April 2015 remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. C) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. A review of the modified proposed project, the previous hydrology study and the updated hydrology study have determined that it remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. g, h, i) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The Village at Lakeshare 27 Templalon Planning Group Initial SlutlylMltigatetl NegI(Ive Gealaretion April, 2016 Land Use and Land Use Planning a) Physically divide an established community? New Ability to No ❑ Substantially Substantial iJ New More Reduce Change Frorn Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis project (including, but not limited to the general plan, 10. LAND USE AND LAND USE PLANNING — Would the project: specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ El ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or iJ U ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Discussion The proposed project is consistent with the adopted Specific Plan, City of Lake Elsinore General Plan and Zoning Code. a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. A review of the adopted and modified proposed project have determined that it remains consistent with the adopted land use controls, and onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCM 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. b) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. A review of the adopted and modified proposed project have determined that it remains consistent with adopted land use controls, and onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis of mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. C) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation Measure 4.1 on Page 5-19 of the adopted MND remains adequate. A review of the adopted and modified proposed project have determined that it remains adequate, as The Wage at Lakeshore 28 remploon Planning Group Initial Sru lylMltlgelee Negative Declaration April, 2015 onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND, The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis Mineral Resources New Abilityfo No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the stale? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important El ❑ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion a,b) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. A review of the adopted MND and modified proposed project have determined that the analysis remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation pleasures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Noise New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 12. NOISE — Would the project: a) Result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, El El noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, El El excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? P V Ilago al t ake,hore 29 Te,,pJrt. Pla r i ng Group In10al SwdylMllag ltd Negative Declaration April, 2015 An updated Noise Impact Analysis (Giroux, 02/25/15) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts associated with noise resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section, and is included in the Appendix. The existing noise environment is similar to that when the original MND was adopted. The following discussion summarizes the findings of the updated Noise Impact Assessment. Baseline Noise Levels The project area is currently an undeveloped parcel and is sturounded by other residential uses and a high school. Traffic on SR -74 and Grand Avenue, are the most significant contributors to area wide noise levels, and are adjacent to the project site. Existing noise levels in the project area were derived from traffic volumes provided in the project traffic report. Table 3 shows the surrounding area roadway traffic volumes and corresponding noise levels: Table 3 Existing ADT/CNEL Noise Levels Roadway Segment ` Existing Traffic Volumes Existing Noise Levels (at New Ability to No 50 feet from centerline Riverside Dr/ Stadium -Grand 14,100 Substantially Substantial 6,100 New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase L1 F—I L1 in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 11 L1 El area, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, in an area within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels? t) For a project located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion An updated Noise Impact Analysis (Giroux, 02/25/15) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts associated with noise resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section, and is included in the Appendix. The existing noise environment is similar to that when the original MND was adopted. The following discussion summarizes the findings of the updated Noise Impact Assessment. Baseline Noise Levels The project area is currently an undeveloped parcel and is sturounded by other residential uses and a high school. Traffic on SR -74 and Grand Avenue, are the most significant contributors to area wide noise levels, and are adjacent to the project site. Existing noise levels in the project area were derived from traffic volumes provided in the project traffic report. Table 3 shows the surrounding area roadway traffic volumes and corresponding noise levels: Table 3 Existing ADT/CNEL Noise Levels Roadway Segment ` Existing Traffic Volumes Existing Noise Levels (at (vehicles per da 50 feet from centerline Riverside Dr/ Stadium -Grand 14,100 69.3 dB CNEL Grand Ave/ N of Riverside 6,100 64.5 dB CNEL With the existing noise levels currently exceeding residential land use noise compatibility thresholds it is likely that area build out conditions will provide for even less favorable traffic - related noise levels. "Therefore, it is likely that noise mitigation for the project residential uses will require evaluation depending on project setbacks. — --- - The Vtllage at Lakeshore 30 Templeton Planning Group Initial ShirlylMlllgated Negative pedara(ion April, 2015 Project -Related Vehicular Noise Impacts Long-term noise concerns from the increase of residential uses at the project site center primarily on vehicular operations on project area roadways. These concerns were addressed using the California specific vehicle noise curves (CALVENO) in the federal roadway noise model (the PIIWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, P1 IWA-RD-77-108). This model calculates the Leq noise level for a particular reference set of input conditions, and then makes a series of adjustments for site-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds, or noise barriers. Table 4 summarizes the 24-hour CNEL level at 50 feet from the roadway centerline along area roadway segments using data provided in the project traffic report. As shown in Table 4, the maximum project impact is +0.3 dB CNEL at 50 feet from centerline on Riverside Drive between Stadium Way and Grand Avenue. This impact is much less than the +3.0 dB significance threshold. Traffic volumes on area roadways are already large such that any project related contribution is greatly diluted. Project related traffic noise impacts are considered to be less -than - significant. Table 4 The Village at Lakeshore Traffic Noise Impact Analysis (dBA CNEL at 50 feet from Centerline) SegmentExisting Existing + Project Build -Out Build -Out + Project Riverside Dr/ E of Lakeshore Dr 68.5 68.6 71.8 71.9 Lakeshore -Lincoln 69.3 69.5 71,9 72.0 Lincoln -Stadium 68.5 68.7 71.2 71.3 Stadium -Grand 68.1 68.4 70.8 71.0 Grand Ave/ N of Machado 62.4 62.5 66.3 66.4 Machado -Riverside Dr 64.5 64.6 67.2 67.3 Riverside Dr -Macy St 68.5 68.6 70.6 70.7 S of Macy St 68.5 68.5 70.6 70.6 Mac St/ E of Grand 57.0 57.0 70.6 70.6 W of Grand 58.6 58.6 59.4 59.4 Lincoln St/ Machado -Riverside Dr 65.0 65.0 66.7 66.7 N Lakeshore Dr/ N of Riverside Dr_ 68.3 68.4 69.6 69.7 S of Riverside Dr 67.9 67.9 69.7 69.7 Roadway Noise The project site is primarily exposed to noise from adjacent roadways. As shown in Table 4, along the Grand Avenue frontage, calculated noise levels are expected to reach 67 dB CNEL at 50 feet from roadway centerline at area build -out. The closest planned on site building fagade is approximately 80 feet from the Grand Avenue centerline. Useable outdoor space on the ground Tho Village at Lakesnore 31 Templeton Plan rnng Group Initial Study/Mttigaled Negative Declaration April, 2015 level would be considered to have a 70 foot centerline setback distance. Project -related off-site traffic noise changes on existing streets are less than significant. Build -out noise levels along Riverside Drive in the project vicinity are expected to reach 71 dB CNEL at 50 feet from centerline, as shown in Table 5. The closest on site fagade and recreational use for Riverside Drive is similar to those along the Grand Avenue frontage. Therefore, the following noise loadings are anticipated under build out conditions at the indicated setback distances: Table 5 Buildout Roadway Noise Levels High School Related Noise Regularly scheduled school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., provided a special events permit is also required for band activities on City streets. Regularly scheduled activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds. However, the use of public address or amplified music systems is not permitted to exceed the exteriornoise standard of adjacent property at the property line. Nevertheless, the potential noise activities generated on the high school ground have been examined. The two dominant noise sources associated with the Stadium are crowd noise and the public address system. The nearest spectator seating area to the project site is located approximately 500 feet away and faces away from the project. The other seating area is approximately 700 feet away from the project. Sound from the PA system is usually directed towards the spectator seating area. The project is not immediately adjacent to the Stadium or spectator area. Mitigation Features Required to meet a 60 dB CNEL Compatibility Threshold Patios or decks with a line of sight to Grand Avenue will require 5.5 dB of noise attenuation to meet the recommended exterior compatibility threshold of 60 dB CNEL. The planned 6 -foot perimeter wall would provide at least -6 dB of noise attenuation and reduce noise at any ground story yard to less than 60 dB CNEL. The Village al Lakeahere 32 Templeton Planning Group Initial StedylMlllgated Negative Declaration April, 2015 Distance from Roadway C/L to Noise Level for Distance frotn Noise Loading at Ground Story Recreational User C/L to Building Facade 'Recreational Use Facade Grand Avenue 70 feet 65.5 dB 80 feet 65 dB Riverside Drive 70 feet 69.5 dB 80 feet 69 dB High School Related Noise Regularly scheduled school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., provided a special events permit is also required for band activities on City streets. Regularly scheduled activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds. However, the use of public address or amplified music systems is not permitted to exceed the exteriornoise standard of adjacent property at the property line. Nevertheless, the potential noise activities generated on the high school ground have been examined. The two dominant noise sources associated with the Stadium are crowd noise and the public address system. The nearest spectator seating area to the project site is located approximately 500 feet away and faces away from the project. The other seating area is approximately 700 feet away from the project. Sound from the PA system is usually directed towards the spectator seating area. The project is not immediately adjacent to the Stadium or spectator area. Mitigation Features Required to meet a 60 dB CNEL Compatibility Threshold Patios or decks with a line of sight to Grand Avenue will require 5.5 dB of noise attenuation to meet the recommended exterior compatibility threshold of 60 dB CNEL. The planned 6 -foot perimeter wall would provide at least -6 dB of noise attenuation and reduce noise at any ground story yard to less than 60 dB CNEL. The Village al Lakeahere 32 Templeton Planning Group Initial StedylMlllgated Negative Declaration April, 2015 The proposed perimeter wall will not assist in noise mitigation for possible upper level balconies or decks fronting Grand Avenue. It is recommended that any balconies or decks with a line -of - sight to Grand Avenue be equipped with a 6 -foot transparent wall or glass/plastic shield (or combination) enclosure that would permit view while mitigating noise. Again, such an enclosure would provide at least -6 dB of noise attenuation and reduce noise on any patio with a direct view of Grand Avenue to below 60 dB CNEL. Because traffic noise along the Riverside Drive frontage is higher, a noise wall would need to be 9 feet high to mitigate noise to below 60 dB CNEL. It would not be possible to mitigate noise at Lipper level balconies or decks with a line of sight to Riverside Drive to below 60 dB. However recreational uses at the project may be considered to be common outdoor space located in the interior of the complex. The ground level pool and recreational area can be considered common use space. This area is noise protected by the perimeter residential units such that noise levels are expected to be within the 60 dBA CNEL limit Most jurisdictions do not require noise protection for individual recreational space if noise -protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. Therefore, the following mitigation measure is recommended to meet a 60 dB CNEL exterior noise threshold: Consider interior conunon outdoor space, which is shielded by buildings from roadway noise and is therefore below the 60 dBA CNEL threshold, to adequately provide outdoor open space for residents without the need for noise -protected patios or decks. Most jurisdictions do not require noise protection for individual recreational space if noise -protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. Should the City of Lake Elsinore make this same determination for this project no mitigation perimeter would be required. Mitigation Features Required to meet a 65 dB CNEL Compatibility Threshold The planned 6 -foot perimeter wall would reduce any project ground story residential use noise to below a 65 dB CNEL threshold. However, along the Riverside Drive frontage a 5- foot enclosure would be required for any upper level balcony or deck with a line of sight to the roadway. Along the Grand Avenue frontage no mitigation would be required for upper level patios or decks. The interior residential noise standard is 45 dB CNEL. 1 -or typical wood -framed construction with stucco and gypsum board wall assemblies, the exterior to interior noise level reduction is as follows: • Partly open windows— 12 dB • Closed single -paned windows -20 dB • Closed dual -paned windows — 30 dB • Use of dual -paned windows is required by the California Building Code (CBC) for energy conservation in new residential construction. Interior standards will be met as long as residents with a line of -sight to Grand Avenue or Riverside Drive have the option to close their windows. Where window closure is needed to shut Tile Village at Lakeshore 33 Templeton Planning Group Initial Stutly/Mltigetetl Negative Deda,, ion Apill, 2015 out noise, supplemental ventilation is required by the CBC with some specified percentage of fresh make-up air. Central air conditioning with a fresh air inlet would meet this requirement. MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures have been included in the updated Noise Impact Assessment. These mitigation measures are in addition to the previously adopted MND mitigation measures. MM -1, Noise: Short-term construction noise intrusion shall be mitigated by compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore Noise Ordinance. The allowed hours of construction are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. Because of the distance between the project and adjacent residential receivers, construction may be noisier than prescribed limits on occasion but are minimized by the following conditions: • All equipment shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers • Equipment and materials shall be staged in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. • All construction -related activities shall be restricted to the construction hours outlined in the City's Noise Ordinance. • I Iain truck and other construction -related trucks traveling to and from the project site shall be restricted to the same hours specified for the operation of construction equipment. To the extent feasible, haul routes shall not pass directly by sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. MM -2, Noise: The City consider common outdoor space, which is shielded by buildings from roadway noise, to adequately provide recreational use space for residents without the need for noise -protected patios or decks to comply with a 60 dBA CNEL threshold. Most jurisdictions do not require noise protection for individual recreational space if noise -protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. Should the City of Lake Elsinore make this same determination for project recreation areas, no mitigation for roadway noise at would be required. • To meet a 60 dB CNEL exterior noise threshold the proposed 6 -foot noise wall would provide adequate noise protection for ground level uses along Grand Ave. However, shielding shall be required for upper level patios or decks. • The planned 6 -foot perimeter noise wall would mitigate noise exposure for ground level uses at all units if a 65 dB CNEL threshold be considered as the compatibility guideline. Upper level patios or decks along the Riverside Drive frontage shall require shielding in the form of glass or plexi -glass enclosures in addition to the 6 -foot noise wall. • As outlined in the updated noise impact assessment, residential habitable rooms facing Riverside Drive or Grand Avenue will meet the City of lake Elsinore 45 dBA CNEL The Village at Lakeshore 34 Templeloi Planning Group Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Oeclarallon Apnl, 2015 interior noise standard with no acoustical mitigation except the provision of supplemental ventilation for rooms where window closure is needed at rates specified in the California Building Code. a,d) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation Measures 11.1 -- 11.4 on Page 5-55 of the adopted MND remain adequate. Additional Mitigation measures as outlined above have been proposed by the updated Noise Impact Assessment to reduce noise impacts to less than significant. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 1 2006071027) . Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis b, e, f) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. Onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. 'The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. A review of the adopted and modified proposed project have determined that it remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduce this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The Village at Lakeshore 35 Templeton Planning Group Initial SmtlylMiligated Negative Gedaration April, 2015 Population and Housing New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Analysis 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing ❑ units, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ ❑ L1 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion a) the analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. The analysis remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. b,c) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. The analysis remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or inhigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measwe reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The Village at Lakeshore 66 Templeton Plermng Group Initial StudylMiligated Negative Declaration April 2015 Public Services New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change Front Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 14. PUBLIC SERVICES —Would the project a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: p Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ M ii) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ M iii) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ M to Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ M v) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ M Discussion a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 200607 1027) identified a less than significant impact. The analysis retrains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant, Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Recreation Issues land Supporting Information Sources): 15. RECREATION —Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The V,11,e at Lekauere 37 Initial SWtlylMltlgatee Negative Declaration Templeton Planning Group ApN,2015 New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Impact Impact Impact Analysis ❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ ❑ ❑ M Templeton Planning Group ApN,2015 Discussion a) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. The analysis remains adequate, as onsite conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the Project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Transportation and Traffic New Abilityto No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Impact Analysis 16. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ❑ ❑ ❑ establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ❑ ❑ ❑ program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? G) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ❑ ❑ ❑ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ ❑ ❑ regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Discussion VA Consulting, Inc. (VA) has completed an update of traffic analysis (03/31/15) for the "Revised Traffic Impact Study Report, The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan, Parcel Map 33267, City of Lake Elsinore," dated October 12, 2005, prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates. ']'his updated analysis is based on an increase in the number of proposed single family dwelling units from 146 to 163. 'this analysis concludes that the proposed increase in The Village at Lakeshore 38 Telnplaton Planning Group Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April, 2015 dwelling units will result in no significant circulation impacts as compared to the previous study and the original project findings and mitigation measwres remain valid. The VA analysis is consistent with all assumptions and methodologies of the previous study with the exception of the identified increase in the number of project dwelling units. The relevant findings of our analysis are discussed in more detail below. Projecl Trip Generalion The original and revised project trip generation based on 146 and 163 multifamily dwelling units, respectively, is shown in Table 6 below. Table 6 Former and Proposed Project Trip Generation Land Use Unit Quant Am Peak Hour Total =1n I Out Pm Peak Hour Daily Total ' In Out Low -Rise Condominium DU 146 98 2574 115 66 49 1,274 Low -Rise Condominium DU 163 109 28 82 127 73 54 1,413 Increase DU 17 11 3 8 12 7 5 139 Table 6 shows that the addition of 17 dwelling units increases the daily site trip generation by 139 vehicle trips. During the am peak hour the total number of trips increases by I 1 trips with 3 inbound and 8 outbound and during the pm peak hour the total number of trips increases by 12 with 7 inbound and 5 outbound. Trq ie Analysis To determine if any significant impacts as compared to the previous study result from the identified additional forecast traffic volumes, intersection level of service (LOS) analysis was performed for each study area intersection included in the previous report. This analysis was performed using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 7 shows that existing intersection level of service (LOS) has generally remained stable over the past 10 years between 2005 and 2015. The only intersection that has experienced a change in LOS by more than two service levels is Macy Street at Grand Avenue. LOS at all other comparable locations has either remained unchanged or improved in at least one peak hour. Six of eight study area intersections have an LOS of D or better during both peak hours under existing traffic conditions. Proposed Project Condilions Two scenarios were included in the original report for analysis of future with project traffic conditions with recommended offsite mitigation measures: 1. Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Conditions; and 2. Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project Conditions. Table 8 shows the results of LOS analysis for the development of the project with an additional 17 low rise condominium units for a total of 163 units under the Existing (2015) The Village at Lakeshore 39 Templeton Planning Group nidal 5tu0ylMlllgated Negativo peGaration April, 2015 plus Ambient Growth plus Project scenario. The project opening year is anticipated to be 2017 so existing 2015 volumes have been grown 2% per year for two years. Table 7 Existing Area Intersection Level of Service Analysis Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions Study Area Intersection ' 2005 ': Control AM Peak Hr : PM Peak Hr .Delay LOS Delay ..LOS - (Secs) :2015 2005 is 2015 Control AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hrf ak Hr Delay LOS Delay :(secs) secs) LOS Delay :(secs) CSLOS All -way Stop 10.7 B 10.4 B 1. Machado SL/Grand Avenue All -way Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 9.2 AA B 11.4 2. Riverside Dr,/Grand Avenue 1 -way Slop 12.4 B 12.0 B 11.7 B 4. Macy St/Grand Avenue B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside Dr.(SR-74) 1 -way Stop OVRFL F OVRFL F OVRFL F 38.7 R 4. Macy St./Grand Avenue 2 -way Stop 16.4 C 30.5 D 57.3 F C E 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 33.8 C 28.4 C 36.2 D 19.7 B 6. Riverside Dr.NV. Lakeshore Dr. Signalized 33.4 C 37.0 D 2,61 C 28.1 C 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized na na no In 16.0 B 4.8 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signalized na na na na 19.3 B Table 8 shows the results of LOS analysis for the development of the project with an additional 17 low rise detached condominium units for a total of 163 units under the Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project scenario. Table 8 Revised Study Area Intersection Level of Service Analysis Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions (With Improvements) Study Area Intersection .__ --.--(secs) ' 2005 ': Control AM Peak Hr : PM Peak Hr .Delay LOS Delay ..LOS - (Secs) :2015 AM Peak Hr ' PM Peak Hr :Delay (secs) Los Delay; (secs) Los 1. Machado St. /Grand Avenue All -way Stop 10.7 B 10.4 B 94 A 10.2 B 2. Riverside Dr./Grand Avenue 1 -way Stop 14.0 B 13.2 8 12.6 B 11.4 B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside Dr.(SR-74) Signalized' 24.9 C 24.0 C 21.3 C 19.6 B 4. Macy St/Grand Avenue Signalized' 4.8 A 5.1 A 4.1 A 5.8 A 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 47.9 D 42.4 D 38.7 D 21.9 C 6. Riverside Dr.NV, Lakeshore Dr. Signalized 36.4 D 41.6 D 25.4 C 29.4 C 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized na na na na 15.9 8 4.7 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadion Way Signalized na na E na na 18.9 B 5.6 A Table 9 shows the results of L,OS analysis for the development of the project with an additional 17 low rise condominium units for a total of 163 units under the Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project scenario. 1 ha Village at Lakeshore 40 Templeton Planning Group Irnhal SWtly1.Jingele0 Negahve Declaration April. 2015 Table 9 Revised Study Area Intersection Level of Service Analysis Cumulative Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions (With Improvements) - Study Area Intersection Control ..., 2005 AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Delay .,LOS Delay. LOS ,secs . secs 2015 " AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Delay 'LOS secs Delay secs LOS 1. Machado SL/Grand Avenue All -way Stop 14,3 B 28.1 D 9.5 A 10.4 B 2. Riverside Dr./Grand Avenue 1 -way Stop 21.8 C 25.3 D 12.8 B 11.4 B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside DL(SR-74) Signalized' 32.8 C 46.5 D 21.1 C 19.5 B 4, Macy St/Grand Avenue Signalized' 6.0 A 27.0 C 4.5 A 7.5 A 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 32.2 C 28.1 C 47.0 D 24.7 C 6. Riverside Dr.NV. Lakeshore Dr. Signalized 29.0 C 44.4 D 26.7 C 30.8 C 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized 8.4 A 5.7 A 15.5 B 4.5 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way signalized 8.1 A 8.0 A 18.1 B 5.3 A Based on the above analysis, an increase of 17 dwelling units will result in a total site development of 163 residential units. Based upon current traffic data Counts within the study area, and an update of traffic forecasts associated with other on-going development projects, the potential for significant project -related circulation network impacts as a result of the additional dwelling units is considered negligible. a, b, d) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation Measures 15.1 - 15.4 on page 5-68 of the adopted MND remain adequate to mitigate traffic impacts to less than significant levels. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. c, e, g) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified no impact. A review of the updated traffic impact assessment shows that the proposed mitigation measures remains adequate, as onsite and surrounding area conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. The V1I188o at Lakeshore 41 Templeton Planning Group Ini0al StudylMitigate Negative Declaration April, 2015 f) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact A review of the updated traffic impact assessment shows that the proposed mitigation treasures remains adequate, as onsite and surrounding area conditions have not substantially changed. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Utilities and Service Systems New Abilityto No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Impact Severe Impact Significant Impact Previous Analysis 17, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of ❑ ❑ M the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ M wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ❑ M water drainage facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ M ❑ M project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ❑ ❑ M M provider that would serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ M ❑ M capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ F1 ❑ M regulations related to solid waste? Discussion a,b, d, e, f, g) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI l 2006071027) identified a less than significant impact. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the The Village at Lakeshore 42 Tomplelon Planning Group Initial Swdy/eflgateo Negaltve Declaration April. 2015 previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. C) The analysis contained in the previously adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCI 2006071027) identified no impact. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The proposed project site land uses are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study and MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) . No additional analysis or mitigation measures are warranted and the previously adopted mitigation measure reduces this impact to less than significant. Please refer to the Appendix for the referenced analysis. Mandatory Findings of Significance New Ability to No Substantially Substantial New More Reduce Change From Significant Severe Significant Previous Issues (and is Supporting Information Sources): Impact Impact Analys .._._ Impact _.__ 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE— Would the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ❑ 11 D environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ❑ ❑ N cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects that would cause it substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion a) The project would not result in significant impacts to special -status plant or wildlife populations or habitat. The project does not affect important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Previously adopted mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce potential impacts to unknown resources to a less -than -significant level. The analysis and conclusions contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) remains adequate for the currently proposed project Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study. The Village at Lakeshore 43 Templeton Planning Group Initial SWhy/Mitigated Negative Declaration Apol, 2015 b) Cumulative impacts which could potentially be significant are included within the resource -specific discussions above (Items 1-17). The emnulative analysis considered past projects, existing projects, future projects, With mitigation, cumulative impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. The analysis contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) remains adequate for the currently proposed project. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are substantially in conformance with the prgject previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study. C) As analyzed in the specific -resources sections above any environmental affects directly or indirectly affecting humans would be reduced to a less -than -significant level with previously adopted and newly proposed mitigation measures. The analysis contained in the previously adopted MND (09/12/06 - SCH 2006071027) remains adequate for the currently proposed project. Baseline environmental conditions and regulatory requirements remain similar to those described in the previously adopted MND. The project site acreage, development intensity/character, recreational amenities, open space areas, drainage facilities and construction phasing are substantially in conformance with the project previously evaluated in the adopted Initial Study. Tlie Village at Lakeshore 44 Templeton Planning Group Initial SWdy/Miligatetl Negative Declaration April, 2015 References I. Albert A. Webb Associates, Acoustical Iinpact Analysis for Tentative Tract Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, May 3, 2006 2. Albert A. Webb Associates, Ali- Quality Impact Analysis for Tentative Tract Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, September 2005 3. Albert A. Webb Associates, Drainage Studies for Tentative Tract Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, September 2005 4. Albert A. Webb Associates, Revised Traffic Impact Study Report: The Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan, Parcel Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, October 2005 5. Albert A. Webb Associates, Water ,uality Manaaement Plan Por Tentative Parcel Map Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, October 2005 6. City of Lake Elsinore, General Plan, Adopted December 13, 2011 7. City of Lake Elsinore ,Climate Action Plan, Adopted December 13, 2011 8. CRM Tech, Histodcal/Archaeologjcal Resources Survey Report for the La Ventura Project at Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, October 2004 9. Michael Brandman Associates, Western Riverside County MSI CP Consistency Analysis for the Tomlinson Property, APNs 379-050-034 and -006, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, June 2, 2006 10. Southern California Geotechnical, Geotechnical Investigation 336 Unit Residential Development, Tomlinson Property, Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California. July 28, 2004 11. Southern California Geotechnical, Fault Study for 336 Unit Residential DeveloJlment, Tomlinson Property, Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California, July 28, 2004 12. Southern California Geotechnical, Updated Geotechnical Report for TTM 33267, Lake Elsinore, California, July 28, 2004 13, Southern California Geoptechnical, Geotechnical Investegation, Proposed Residential Development. Tract 33267 North Corner Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue I.ake Elsinore, California, April 14, 2015 1. Templeton Planning Group, Letter Update — Air Quality and Biological Resow_ces Technical Studies. March 30, 2015 The Village at Lakeshore 45 Traiprelcai Plarnililng Group Initial Sivtly/Mltigatetl Negalwi, Decleretion April, 2015 2. VA Consulting, Letter Update - Traffic Study Update, ,luly 28, 2014 3. VA Consulting, Undated WOMP, T'I'M 33267,February, 2015 4. Giroux & Associates, Updated Acoustical Analysis, TTM 33267, February 25, 2015 I no Village at Lakeshore 46 Tell Planning Gmap Inilia1 Skrd, Miligaled NegaBve Uedarallon April, 2015 Appendix Appendix A— Expanded Initial Study/MND, August 10, 2006 Appendix B — Letter Update - Air Quality & Biological Resources, March 2015 Appendix C — Updated Geotechnical Investigation, April 14, 2015 Appendix D — Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Appendix E — Updated Drainage Study / Water Quality Management Plan, February, 2015 Appendix F — Updated Noise Study, February 25, 2015 Appendix G — Updated Traffic Study, March 31, 2015 The Village at Lakeshore 47 Templeton Planning Gmup Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Apol 2015 Appendix A Expanded Initial Study/MND, August 10, 2006 Village at Lakeshore Tentative Parcel Map 33267 Specific Plan (SP 2005-01) Zone Change (ZC 2005-01) Conditional Use Permit (2005-21) Design Review (R2005-09) Expanalec/ initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Oeclaration �ifz1 VOLUME 1 Plan "q Commiaim , Approved P ' City �'O�reared for: ��r� p Approved A City of Lake Elsinore 930 S. Main Street i FILE COPY Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Prepared by: FEMPLE'I'ON PLANNING GROUP Community Planning • Urban Design • Environmental Services 1470Jambome Road, Sutm 100, Nowpvl Beech, CA 92M (949) 7IM&W August 10, 2006 cE` J, nrf AUG i I zoc6 U TY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION m I S� D MEMORANDUM To: Matt Harris, Senior Plainer, City of Lake Elsinore Wendy Worthey, Principal Environmental Planner, City of Lake Elsinore From: Nicole Morse, Templeton Planning Group Subject: Village at Lakeshore/Revisions Transportation & Traffic Section of MND SCH # 2006071027 Date: August 28, 2006 The attached two pages are revisions to the Transportation/Traffic Section of the Expanded Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for The Village at Lakeshore. These typographical errors do not affect the transportation and traffic analysis for this project or the findings in the MND. The changes are shown on the attached pages in bold and strikeout and are described below: The traffic study was prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates on October 12, 2005. The project trip generation shown in Table 5-9 for PM 33267 Low -Rise Condo for Peak AM are 98 total, 25 in, and 74 out. I hope these comments assist the City in producing a high-quality, technically accurate MND. Please give me a call at (949) 718-0640 if you have any questions regarding the information contained herein. Attachment S. IS Transportation/Traff o A traffic study was prepared for the proposed project by Albert A. Webb Associates on October 12, 20056. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix H of this document. ASSESSMENT Study Area The study area includes the following intersections: • Machado Street/Grand Avenue Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue • Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74) • Macy Street/Grand Avenue • Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street • Riverside Drive/West Lakeshore Drive Riverside Drive/School Entrance (Cumulative -t- Project Only) Riverside Drive/Stadium Way (Cumulative -+ Project Only) State Route 74 (SR -74) traverses Lake Elsinore from north to south via Collier Avenue, Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, and Ortega Highway and extends from Lake Elsinore to Interstate 5 via Ortega Highway. Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic traveling to and from the proposed project. The traffic generation figures determined for the project are based upon the development of 146 condominium dwelling units as currently proposed. Trip generation rates are based upon a publication entitled "Trip Generation" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), seventh edition. Table 5-8 provides the peak hour trip generation rates for the proposed project. The peak hour rates are based on the average peak hour generation rate multiplied by the directional distribution provided in ITE's trip generation publication. Land Use category 231 does not have daily trip generation rates, therefore a similar land use category 230 was used to interpolate the daily trip generation rate based on total PM peak hour trip generation rates. After interpolation, this publication indicates that for condominium dwelling units, 8.67 trips per day per dwelling unit is the average trip generation rate. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-62 Land Use Peak AM Peak PM Daily Total In Out Total In Out PM 33267 0.67 0.17 0.50 0.78 0.45 0.33 8.67 Low -Rise Condo Land use Category: 231 Trip Generation by the Instinde of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Seventh Edition, 2003. ** Derived rate based on Land Use 230 Table 5-9 provides the daily and peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. As shown on Table 5-9, Parcel Map 33267 is projected to generate approximately 1,274 daily trips, including 98 trips during the AM peak hour and 115 trips during the PM peak hour. Project Impacts Tables 5-10 and 5-11 shows the projected LOS under existing plus ambient growth plus project conditions, with and without improvements. Tables 5-12 and 5-13 provides the projected LOS at the study intersections under cumulative conditions plus ambient growth with the proposed project with and without offsite improvements. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-63 SCH # 2006071027 DRAFT CIRCULATED: July 7, 2006 - August 7, 2006 FINAL EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE Tentative Parcel Map 33267 Specific Plan (SP 2005-01) Zone Change (ZC 2005-01) Conditional Use Permit (2005-21) Design Review (R2005-09) Lead Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, 92530 Contact: Matthew Harris, Senior Planner, (951) 674-3124 Prepared By: TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP 1470 Jamboree Road, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Nicole Morse, Director of Environmental Services (949)718-0640 August 10, 2006 Table of Contents Section pane 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ...... ................................. 1-1 1.2 Environmental Procedures .................................. 1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ 2-1 2.1 Location of Project .... ................................... 2-1 2.2 Statement of Objectives .................................... 2-1 2.3 Project Characteristics ..................................... 2-5 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................... 3-1 3.1 Location and Land Use . - - . ................................. 3-1 3.2 Climate and Air Quality ................................... . 3-1 3.3 Biology .................................................3-2 3.4 Geology and Soils ......................................... 3-2 3.5 Drainage ................................................3-3 3.6 Noise ...................................................3-3 3.7 Traffic ................. ................................ 3-3 3.8 Adopted General Plan and Zoning Designations ................. 3-4 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ................................... 4-1 5,0 DISCUSSION OF CHECKLIST AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......... 5-1 5.1 Aesthetics ............................................... 5-1 5.2 Agricultural Resources - . ................................... 5-5 5.3 Air Quality ............................................... 5-6 5.4 Biological Resources ...................................... 5-16 5,5 Cultural Resources ....................................... 5-20 5.6 Geology and Soils ........................................ 5-24 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............. ........... - 5-31 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................... 5-35 5.9 Land Use and Planning .................................... 5-44 5.10 Mineral Resources .......................................5-46 5.11 Noise ..................................................5-47 5.12 Population and Housing ................................... 5-57 5.13 Public Services .......................................... 5-58 5.14 Recreation .................. ........................... 5-60 5.15 Transportation/Traffic ...... .............................. 5-62 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Table of Contents (Continued section Pq e 5.16 Utility & Service .......................................... 5-70 5.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................... 5-73 6.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED ..................... 6-1 6.1 Preparers ............................. .................. 6-1 6.2 Persons and Organizations Consulted ......................... 6-1 6.3 Project Applicant .......................................... 6-2 7.0 LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................... 7-1 Appendix (VOLUME II INCLUDED ON CD IN INSERT) A. AIR QUALITY STUDY B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES STUDY C. CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION/SB18 TRIBAL CONSULTATION D. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT/FAULT STUDY E. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT F. DRAINAGE STUDY/WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN G. NOISE STUDY H. TRAFFIC STUDY I. PUBLIC SERVICES CORRESPONDENCE J. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study List of Exhibits Exhibit Pd-ag 2-1 REGIONAL LOCATION .......................................... 2-2 2-2 VICINITY MAP ................................................2-3 2-3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ......................................... 2-4 2-4 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ....................................... 2-6 2-5 SITE PLAN ...... ..................... ...................... 2-7 2-6 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ................................ 2-8 2-7 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN ................................. 2-9 3-1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN & ZONING DESIGNATIONS ............... 3-5 5-1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS .......................................... 5-2 5-2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS .......................................... 5-3 5-3 FAULT LOCATION ............................................ 5-28 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study iii List of Tab/es Table Page 5-1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS PER MONTH .............. 5-7 5-2 ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT OPERATION EMISSIONS ............. 5-10 5-3 CO HOTSPOT ANALYSIS RESULTS ............................ . . 5-12 5-4 STANDARD VEHICLE MIX (PERCENT) ............................ 5-48 5-5 NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET FROM CENTERLINE OF ROADWAYS IN PROJECT VICINITY ........................... 5-49 5-6 INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS TO SECOND FLOOR RECEIVERS 5-11 LEVEL OF SERVICE -EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH 'i PLUS PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 5-64 5-12 LEVEL OF SERVICE -CUMULATIVE PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS .................................. 5-65 H 5-13 LEVEL OF SERVICE - CUMULATIVE PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 5-65 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study iv k (dBA):RIVERSIDE.............................................5-52 5-7 INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS TO SECOND FLOOR RECEIVERS (dBA):GRAND AVENUE ........................................ 5-52 5-8 TRIP GENERATION RATES ..................................... 5-63 5-9 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION .................................. i. 5-63 5-10 LEVEL OF SERVICE - EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS .................................. 5-64 5-11 LEVEL OF SERVICE -EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH 'i PLUS PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 5-64 5-12 LEVEL OF SERVICE -CUMULATIVE PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS .................................. 5-65 H 5-13 LEVEL OF SERVICE - CUMULATIVE PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 5-65 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study iv k fl Introduction and Summary I -I Purpose and Scope This Expanded Initial Study addresses the environmental effects associated with the development of the Village at Lakeshore in the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. Implementation of the project includes a Tentative Parcel Map 33267, Specific Plan (SP 2005-01), Zone Change (ZC 2005-01), Conditional Use Permit (2005-21), and Design Review (R2005-09) to allow for the development of 146 residential units and associated infrastructure on approximately 20 acres. This Initial Studyhas been prepared in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore's Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the City of Lake Elsinore with information to use as the basis for making an environmental determination regarding the appropriate CEQA documentation for the proposed project. An Environmental Impact Report must be prepared when the Lead Agency determines that it can be fairly argued, based on substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) may be prepared if the Initial Study identifies a potentially significant effect for which the project's proponent, before public release of a proposed Negative Declaration, has made or agrees to make project revisions that clearly mitigate the effects. For such an MND, specific mitigation measures should be developed and agreed to before project approval. Data for this Initial Study was obtained from on-site field observations, discussions with the City of Lake Elsinore and affected agencies, analyses of adopted plans and policies, review of existing studies, and specialized environmental studies (air quality, biology, geotechnical, Phase I, hydrology, noise and traffic). t,2 Environmental Procedures This Expanded Initial Study has been prepared in determining if an EIR is necessary for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), its companion CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Lake Elsinore's procedures for implementing CEQA. Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines authorizes a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration when: (a) The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study �_� environment, or (b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but: (I) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made, or agreed- to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. Thus, where the project proponent agrees to revise the project to incorporate appropriate mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant effects to a level of insignificance, then the Lead Agency may prepare and adopt a mitigated negative declaration. The City of Lake Elsinore, as Lead Agency for the project, has determined that implementation of Tentative Parcel Map 33267 which allows for the construction of 146 residential units requires environmental review in order to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Therefore, the purpose of this Expanded Initial Study is to analyze the proposed project to ascertain whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the above State CEQA Guidelines, an analysis of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project was performed as set forth in this Expanded Initial Study. Based on the environmental checklist form prepared for the project and supporting environmental analysis (provided in Section 4), the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact in the following environmental issue areas: • Agricultural Resources • Hazards and Hazardous Wastes • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation Prior to the implementation of applicable mitigation measures, significant impacts could occur for the following environmental categories: Aesthetics Air Quality Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 1-2 • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology/Soils • Hydrology/Water Quality • Noise • Utilities/Service Systems • Transportation/Traffic In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, it is appropriate to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed development because, after incorporation of the mitigation measures, the project will not result in any significant impacts. All project -level impacts can be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 1.3 Project Description 2. f Location of Project The proposed project site consists of approximately 20 acres located in the western portion of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California, as shown in Exhibit 2-1. More specifically, the site is located on the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Avenue west of Lake Elsinore, as shown on Exhibit 2-2. Regional access to the site is provided by the Temecula Valley Freeway (Interstate 15). The site is generally bounded by apartments and vacant land to the northwest, commercial uses to the northeast, mobile homes and Lake Elsinore to the east and southeast, and mini storage and residential to the southwest. An aerial photograph of the project site is shown on Exhibit 2-3. 2.2 Statement of Objectives The following objectives have been established for the proposed projectand will aid decision makers in their review of the project and associated environmental impacts. Create a community where homeowners can live in a comfortable, safe and healthy environment, and appreciate the value of living within a lake -style setting of Lake Elsinore. Create a community that enhances the City's vision of incorporating well-planned communities. Provide a medium density home ownership opportunity that meets the needs of the current market demand. Create community continuity by providing a logical transition of uses from vacant and/or open space areas to the adjoining residential uses. Create a residential community which is compatible with the surrounding area and consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan and Zoning Designations for the site and the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 2-1 Moreno Valley 60 10 ,Woodcrest El Cerrito 215 Lake View 79 Gillman Hot Springs San Jacinto PROJECT 74 SITE 74 Rivers.Winchester GrahgoP� 0 Lake Elsinore 0 79 15 215 Wildomar Sage Riverside Co. ............... Temecula San Diego Co. 371 79 Aguago ...... ..... .................................. ................. Fallbrook Village at Lakeshore Lake Elsinore, CA TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP Hir1libit Z- I HAEGION,41- LOCAT101V 0 2.5 mi 5.0 Mi ri-I L --A Village at Lakeshore Lake Elsinore, CA TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP JEWlibit IZ-AZ VACINITV MAP 0 625' 1,211' _j OVUIGG. HIUt'Il H. vvtivu H3SVGItliBS Village at Lakeshore Lake Elsinore, CA TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP Exhibit 2-3 0 435 870' Z.3 Project Characteristics The proposed project consists of Tentative Parcel Map 33267 (as shown on Exhibit 2-4), Specific Plan (SP 2005-01), Zone Change (ZC 2005-01), Conditional Use Permit (2005-21), and Design Review (82005-09) to develop 146 medium density residential units on approximately 19.7 acres, averaging 7.4 units per acre, as shown on Exhibit 2-5. Residential units will consist of attached condominium two-story buildings, with individual attached garages. Each condominium will be developed with mechanical ventilation. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan defines the development regulations, requirements and design guidelines for the development of the residential neighborhoods, open space, and recreational improvements within the project site. It also establi shes the type, location, intensity and character of development, and the required infrastructure to support the planned land uses. The major components of the Specific Plan are as follows: • Introduction (Purpose and Project Objectives) • Planning Framework • Specific Development Plan • Circulation Plan • Infrastructure and Public Services (Water, Sewer, Drainage and Utilities) • Implementation • General Plan Consistency Access will be provided by two gated entrances off of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue adjacent to the southeast and southwest boundary of the site, respectively. The project will be developed as a private residential community that will include two gated entrances, a perimeter 6 -foot block wall, internal streets and common open space with recreational amenities. The internal street will have a 32 -foot paved section to accommodate one 12 -foot travel lane in each direction, on -street parallel parking on one side (8 -feet in width) with a 4 -foot sidewalk. The project will provide a total of 106 visitor parking spaces located along the internal street system and adjacent to the recreation area. The conceptual landscape plan is located on Exhibit 2-6. The plan designates the primary common recreation and open space areas and connecting links. The recreation area will include a swimming pool, spa, open turf area, sitting area, enhanced paving surface, two visitor parking areas, and a storage area with a secured gate for motorized equipment. Additional open turf areas will be provided for passive recreational uses. Exhibit 2-7 illustrates the proposed Drainage Plan. The plan shows that storm water runoff within the project area will be collected through a system of on-site storm drain pipes and into an on-site water quality basin with a diversion beam and bio Swale located at the northeast comer of the project site. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 2-5 a� I M d a p 1d 2 g £ pp 4 q 55 fPpy� � �,p p gyp{ 8��1a4b4�� k�PP�� 9VEk § tq 4 §§qgn anln.. y m a 'o __ mrin�.n c t7 urnn u z \"� v � z z s N O w — J n W a � r m w '° m s '" 2 NJ ,a, 4 � �W d � � h E i P pfi 5 g� 8 i d o G t U v s m t0 `o J � N _N N W m � i J o' Up' u 5 a 0 w H 3 Envirenmenta/ Setting 3. f Location and Land Use The project site is located less than a half mile northwest of Lake Elsinore. The current condition of the site consists of exposed soil with moderate grass and weed growth and several large trees concentrated in the northern corner of the project site. The proposed project area is bounded by Riverside Drive to the southeast, Grand Avenue to the southwest, a concrete flood control channel to the northwest and northeast, and Ulla Lane to the northeast. Existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site include residential and open space areas to the southeast and northwest of the project site, and Lakeside High School located adjacent and northeast of the project site. The project area has distinctive views of the lake and surrounding hillside and mountains. The site is situated in the Elsinore Valley, northeast of the Santa Ana -Elsinore mountain range, and within a half mile west of Lake Elsinore, one of the few large natural lakes in southern California. The hills and mountains to the southwest reach elevations as high as 4,400 feet above sea level, but the terrain in the valley is relatively level. The surface elevation of the project site is approximately 1,280 feet above sea level. The project area is relatively flat with a slight slope from the northwest to the southeast, toward the lake. No significant topographic features exist on site. 3.2 Climate and Air Quality The project site is located in Riverside County, which is within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The SCAB consists of Orange County, together with the coastal and mountain portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Regionally, the interaction of land (offshore) and sea (onshore) breezes control local wind patterns in the area. Daytime winds typically flow from the coast to the inland areas, while this pattern usually reverses in the evenings. Air stagnation may occur during the early evening and early morning due to periods of transition between day and nighttime flows. The region also experiences periods of hot, dry winds from the desert, known as Santa Ana winds. Locally, the prevailing wind is from west to east. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 3.1 S.3 Biology Historically, the project area was primarily used for agricultural operations and experienced long- term disturbance by dry land farming and discing. Human activity has altered the natural vegetation and soils conditions that once occurred throughout the project area have been altered. Based on the findings of site-specific general and focused species-specific biological studies conducted by Michael Brandman Associates, (June 2004), the project site does not contain native and/or sensitive plant species. Western Riverside County MSHCP The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional conservation plan focusing on protection of covered species and their associated habitats in western Riverside County. The goal of the MSHCP is to maintain biological and ecological diversity within a rapidly urbanizing region. The approval of the MSHCP and execution of the implementing Agreement (IA) allows signatories of the IA to issue "Take" authorizations for all species covered by the MSHCP, including state and federally listed species as well as other identified covered species and/or their habitats. Each city or local jurisdiction within western Riverside County imposes a Development Mitigation Fee for projects within their jurisdiction. With payment of the mitigation fee to the County of Riverside and e compliance with the survey requirements of the MSHCP, full mitigation in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) is granted. Based upon the MSHCP, the project site is not located in an area that requires habitat assessments R for sensitive wildlife species, narrow endemic plants, or Cell Criteria plants. Section 6.1.2 of the 1 MSHCP requires an assessment of potential riparian/riverine and vernal pool habitat onsite. No riparian/riverine or vernal pool habitat is present on the site. In addition, Section 6.1.4 calls for an urban/wildlife interface assessment. The project is surrounded by development on all sides and the closest MSHCP conservation area, Cleveland National Forest, occurs about one mile west ofthe site. 3.4 Geology and Soils According to the USGS Soil Survey, the project area is underlain by Quaternary young alluvium valley soil which consist of medium dense, damp to moist, fine sandy silt. Site grades within the project area range from a maximum of El. 1301± feet MSL at the western property corner to El. 1273± at the eastern property corner. The site topography slopes downward to the east at an approximate gradient of 2± percent. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 3-2 The project site is not located within a designated earthquake fault zone as defined by the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the Glen Ivy North branch of the Elsinore fault zone located approximately 1.75 miles north-northwest of the project site. A fault study that was performed for the Lake Elsinore Unified School District on the easterly adjacent property concluded that the Wildomar fault was not present on the school district site; however, the Wildomar fault transects the project site and has been determined to be potentially active. 3.6 Drainage Storm runoff generally flows from the northwest towards the southeast on the project site and in the adjacent area. The South Riverside Channel (Stage 1) is directly adjacent to the northern and western sides of the project site. There are also underground culverts located northeast of the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. Storm runoff from adjacent Tract 10706 is intercepted by an existing double culvert that crosses the Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive intersection. Storm runoff from north and west of the project site is intercepted by the South Riverside Channel. 3.6 Noise An interior noise level of 45 dB is mandated by the State of California Noise Insulation Standards (CCR, Title 24, Part 6, Section T25-28) for multiple -family dwellings and for hotel and motel rooms and is typically considered a desirable noise level for all residential dwelling units. Since normal noise attenuation within residential structures with closed windows is about 20-25 dB, an exterior noise exposure of 65 dB is generally the noise land use compatibility guideline for noise sensitive receiver sites in California. Since commercial and industrial activities are generally conducted indoors, the exterior noise exposure standard for such less -sensitive land uses is less stringent. Major noise sources in the project area are derived from commuters traveling along Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. The current noise standards for the City of Lake Elsinore are 60 dBA for exterior noise exposure and 45 dBA for interior noise exposure. 3.7 Traffic Existing vehicular circulation to the project site is accessible through Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. Riverside Drive, a major street within the City's circulation plan, is located adjacent to the southeast side of the project site and runs in a generally north -south direction. It also provides access northward to the Interstate 15 corridor which is located approximately 5 miles to the northeast. Grand Avenue, also a major street within the City's circulation plan, is located adjacent to the project site's southwest boundary and runs in a generally east -west direction. Primary access to the project site is provided off of Grand Avenue. Grand Avenue also provides access to residential neighborhoods northwest of the project site and easterly to the central core of the City. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 3-3 3.8 Adopted Genera/ Plan and Zoning Designations Future development of all land within the City of Lake Elsinore is guided by the General Plan adopted in 1990, which is currently in the process of being updated. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is "Specific Plan Area P," and may consist of a wide range of land uses. The General Plan also identifies Riverside Drive frontage as an area appropriate for general and tourist commercial uses. In addition, this area maybe appropriate for multiple -family housing at a density not exceeding 18 dwelling units per acre, if access off of Riverside Drive is feasible. The City's zoning designation for the project site is Commercial Park (C -P). The intent of the "C -P" District is to reserve appropriate locations consistent with the General Plan to accommodate the needs of tourists and recreational enthusiasts and to protect such areas from intrusion by incompatible uses. The City of Lake Elsinore recognizes that its scenic and recreational resources are of great economic and social importance to the City and the region and therefore permits in this District only uses which are environmentally sensitive and which are capable of contributing to the long-term quality and viability of the area. Permitted uses include: arboretums and horticultural gardens, art galleries, antique shops and auction galleries, automobile rental agencies (offices only), barber and beauty shops, bait shops, boat and boat accessory sales (and repair when in conjunction with sales), bowling alleys, miniature golf courses, theaters, and skating rinks (ice or roller), bicycle rental shops, conventional and conference centers, florists, gift, novelty, and souvenir shops, ice cream shops, jewelry stores, motels and hotels, museums, observatories, private marine, estuarial, wildlife and wilderness preserves, restaurants and eating places (excluding drive-ins, drive- throughs, and those with outdoor eating areas), sports arenas (indoor only), ticket agencies, travel agencies and bureaus and other uses that the Community Development Director determines to be in accord with the purpose of this zoning. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 3-4 GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING: C -P COMMERCIAL PARK Cv-' d lqa Q� SLP Village at Lakeshore Lake Elsinore, CA 77Z7 TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP Lake Elsinore Eadfibit 3- f EX/ST/NG GENERAL PLAN & ZON/NO OES/GNAT/ONS o zoo' aoo CJ 4 Environmental Checklist This section includes the City of Lake Elsinore Environmental Checklist Form and is included on the following pages. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 4-1 INITIAL STUDY City of Lake Elsinore 1. PROJECT: Village at Lakeshore 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Lake Elsinore 3. CONTACT PERSON & PHONE: Matt Harris, Senior Planner (951) 674-3124 Ext. 279 4. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed project site consists of approximately 20 acres located in the western portion of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. More specifically, the project is located at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Avenue west of Lake Elsinore. Regional access to the site is provided by the Temecula Valley Freeway (Interstate 15). 5. APPLICANT: R. Gordon Craig, President, Homebuilding Division, Classic Pacific; 3197 Airport Loop Drive, Building B, Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Specific Plan Area P 7. ZONING: Commercial Park (C -P) 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project consists of Tentative Parcel Map 33267, Specific Plan (SP 2005-01), Zone Change (ZC 2005-01), Conditional Use Permit (2005-21), and Design Review (R2005-09) to develop 146 medium density residential units on approximately 20 acres, averaging 7.4 units per acre. Residential units will consist of attached condominium two-story buildings, with individual attached garages. 9. SURROUNDING LAND USES(S) & PROJECT SETTING: Surrounding land uses include residential to the northwest and southwest and a proposed high school to the northeast. The project area is currently vacant and the terrain is level mostly as a result of mechanical leveling in the past. 10. OTHER REQUIRED AGENCY APPROVALS: City of Lake Elsinore, Approval of Specific Plan, Approval of Tentative Parcel Map, Rezoning from Commercial Park (C -P) to Medium Density, Approval of Conditional Use Permit Residential (R-2), Design Review Approval; Riverside County Flood Control District, Encroachment Permit, Municipal Stormwater Permit, Best Management Practices; County of Riverside Fire Department, Fire Access and Safety Standards. 11. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: (See Section 7 of this document) 12. CONSULTATION: City of Lake Elsinore Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development Matt Harris. Senior Planner Documents & Resources City of Lake Elsinore, General Plan 2005 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines) 13. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: A summary of the environmental factors potentially affected by this project, consisting of a Potentially Significant Impact or Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated, include: ❑x Aesthetics ❑ 0 Biological Resources 0 ❑x Hazards O ❑ Mineral Resources ❑x ❑ Public Services ❑ N Utilities Systems 14. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: Agricultural ❑D Cultural Resources ❑x Water ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑X Air Quality Geological Land Use & Planning Population & Housing Transportation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. E I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have "a potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at lease one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required ❑ W ndy Worth y Principal Envi mental PI ne July 3, 2006 Date ti 15. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts which may result from the proposed project. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the Initial Study Checklist includes specific questions and responses according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Study. The analysis considers the project's short-term impacts (construction -related) as well as operation or day-to-day impacts. For each question, there are four possible responses: 1. No Impact. Future development arising from the project's implementation will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment and no additional analysis is required. 2. Less Than Significant Impact. The development associated with project implementation will have the potential to impact the environment; these impacts, however, will be less than the levels or thresholds that are considered significant and no additional analysis is required. 3. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated The development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the project's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Future implementation will have impacts that are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measure that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Ol — dN a41� J V! Z 15.1 AESTHETICS. Would the project: a. Have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building along a ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ State -designated scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 15.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance as depicted on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of CA. Resources ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x Agency? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 non-agricultural use? 15.3 AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b. Violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under the applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ Z ❑ people? 15.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Have substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, ❑ ❑ ❑ policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the USFWS? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ and Game (DFG) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) ❑ ❑ M ❑ through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 biological resources, such as tree preservation policy/ordinance? I. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 15.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ Q ❑ historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of CEQA? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of CEQA? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ formal cemeteries? 15.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i.) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist, or based on other substantial evidence of a ! known fault (Refer to DM&G Pub. 42)?; or, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (ii.)Strong seismic ground shaking?; or. I El O 11 11(iii.)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?; or, ❑ ❑ ❑ 5fl (iv.)Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially ❑ Q ❑ ❑ result in on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 1 1994 UBC, creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are ❑ ❑ ❑ E) not available for the disposal of wastewater? 15.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ N ❑ materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable conditions involving the release of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safely hazard for people residing or working in ❑ ❑ j] �❑� the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are ❑ n ❑ 0 adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 15.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ 9 ❑ ❑ capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ FX] ❑ ❑ g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map ❑ ❑ ❑ Z or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which ❑ ❑ [j ! would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 k. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ 1. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction or post ❑ ❑ ❑ construction? m. Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? n. Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ beneficial uses of the receiving waters? o. Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? p. Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ surrounding areas? 15.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural❑ x❑ ❑ ❑ community conservation plan? 15.10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 plan or other land use plan? 15.11 NOISE. Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? -- J of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 roundborne noise levels? G.tial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Fviiaftyll ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ y above levels existing without the project? tial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ ❑ ❑ project? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ❑ ❑ ❑ excessive noise levels? 15.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 15.13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ b. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ c. Schools? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ d. Parks? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ e. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 9 15.14 RECREATION a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that ❑ ❑ x❑ ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have ❑ ❑ ❑ an adverse physical effect on the environment? 15.15 TRANS PO RTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion/management ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ (e.g,, farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ Z ❑ g. Conflict with applicable policies, plans, or programs supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 15.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 10 - Require or result in the construction of new storm waternage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ Qstruction of which could cause significant environmental cts? [I Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded ❑ ❑ ❑ entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? I. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ❑ ❑ ❑ accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ related to solid waste? 15.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a, Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to decrease below self- ❑ n ❑ ❑ sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable (Cumulatively considerable means the ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ project's incremental effects are considerable when compared to the past, present, and future effects of other projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will have ❑ ❑x ❑ ❑ substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly? 11 5 L7iscussion of Checklist and Mitigation Measures S. f Aesthetics ASSESSMENT The project site is located in the Elsinore Valley, northeast of the Santa Ana -Elsinore mountain range. Lake Elsinore is located a half -mile west of the project site. The hills and mountains to the southwest reach elevations as high as 4,400 feet above sea level. The project site is characterized by relatively flat topography with a slight slope from the northwest to the southeast, toward the lake with an elevation of approximately 1,280 feet above sea level. No significant topographic features exist on the site. The proposed project will result in the development of 146 single family attached homes, two -stories in height with a maximum building height of 18 feet, consistent with the surrounding development located north, west and south of the site. In addition, a six-foot wall will be constructed around the perimeter of the project site. Photographs ofthe site and surrounding area are located on Exhibits 5-1 and 5-2. The site consists primarily of undeveloped open space that was previously used for agricultural and nursery operations. Vegetation on-site consists primarily of moderate grass and weed growth with several large trees concentrated in the northern corner of the project site. A concrete flood control channel borders the site to the northwest. Surrounding land uses consist of vacant open space to the north, residential uses to the northwest, west, and south, and Lakeside High School to the northeast. Development of the project site would also result in a new source of nighttime illumination, Additional lighting would be needed to provide nighttime street and building illumination. Other sources of light include security lighting, nighttime traffic, and light associated with nighttime use residential use. Lighting will be directed away from the project edge in order to reduce spillover into the nighttime sky or onto adjacent properties. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-1 k�' OT cc 05 IL A) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is not designated as a scenic resource under the General Plan Community Design Element. The project is located adjacent to a scenic vista which offers views from the Cleveland National Forest to views overlooking Lake Elsinore. Development of the proposed project would alter these sensitive receptors' existing views of the Santa Ana Mountain Range and the lake. However, the project site is located at an elevation of approximately 1,280 feet above sea level, while the Santa Ana mountains extend up to 4,400 feet above sea level. In addition, the proposed project is located on flat land and structures would consist of two-story buildings with a maximum building height of 18 feet consistent with the existing residential development located adjacent to the site. In addition, two-story homes currently exist to the northeast and northwest of the project site. Therefore, the development would not substantially affect views of the hillside backdrop or skyline views of sensitive receptors or impair scenic vistas. Mitigation has been incorporated to ensure that the site blends in with the surrounding environment. B) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site consists of ruderal plant species such as short - podded mustard and tree tobacco, as well as non-native trees such as palm and tree of heaven. As stated in Section 5.3, Biological Resources, palm (Medemia nobilis) is not listed as a significant palm according to the City of Lake Elsinore's Significant Palm Tree Ordinance. The project site is currently vacant with no significant topographic features and development would not result in damage to any scenic resources within a state scenic highway. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. C) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site consists of flat undeveloped lands that were previously used for agricultural and nursery uses. The site is located adjacent to existing residential and commercial retail uses to the north and west and would not obstruct the view or have a direct impact to a scenic vista. The proposed structures would consist of two-story buildings the have a maximum building height of 18 feet, consistent with the existing residential development located adjacent to the site. The project is located less than one mile from a "Community Gateway," at SR - 74 and Grand Avenue, as designated in the City's General Plan. The architectural design guidelines established in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan provide for a distinctive visual environment and establish a community identity that will contribute to the stated goals for the City's community gateways. In addition, the color palette for the development will consist of earthen tones to blend in with the hillside backdrop. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-4 D) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would create a new source of light for street lighting and outdoor lighting on homes. However, all lighting associated with the project will be shielded and designed to minimize spill light into the night sky and adjacent properties. In addition, the surrounding area to the north, west and south is already developed and the new sources of light associated with the project would be consistent with the existing land uses. Athletic field lighting associated with Lakeside High School is located more than 300 feet away from the project site and will not result in a significant source of light or glare for future residents. MITIGATION MEASURES 1.1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit preliminary. architectural plans and landscape plans for review and approval by the Design Review Committee and City Council. The architectural design and color palette shall be compatible with the surrounding natural setting. 1.2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit a lighting plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director. 5.2 Agricultural Reseurces ASSESSMENT The project site was historically used for agricultural production. However, the site has not been farmed since the early 1980s. The site was a nursery until 1992, when it was demolished. The site is currently vacant. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. According to this model, the project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. A) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. As described above, the proposed project is not designated for agricultural uses; therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-5 B) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? No Impact. The project site is not subject to an agricultural contract under the Williamson Act and would not convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. C) Would theproject involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. Since the project site and the surrounding area are not in agricultural production, no changes in the existing environment are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are required. S.S Air Quality An air quality study was prepared for the proposed project by Albert A. Webb Associates on September 26, 2005. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix A of this document. ASSESSMENT Air quality impacts of a project may occur during construction and operation on both a regional and local scale. Construction impacts include airborne dust from grading, demolition and dirt hauling and gaseous emissions from heavy equipment, delivery and dirt hauling trucks, employee vehicles, and paints and coatings. Operational impacts occur from utility usage and vehicles traveling to and from the completed site. These impacts may affect regional pollutants, such as ozone, or pollutants, such as carbon monoxide, where the impacts occur very close to the source. For projects in the South Coast Air Basin, the City of Lake Elsinore relies on significance thresholds recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook, as revised in November 1993 and approved by the SCAQMD's Board of Directors. Construction Impacts The project will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 establishes these procedures. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from paved site Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-6 access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition, projects that disturb 50 acres or more of soil or move 5,000 cubic yards of materials per day are required to submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan ora Large Operation Notification Form to SCAQMD. Based on the size of this project, a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or Large Operation Notification would not be required. Short-term emissions were evaluated using the URBEMIS2002 and are summarized in Table 5-1. The model evaluated emissions resulting from site grading and project construction. The default parameters within URBEMIS were used to provide a worst-case scenario of air quality impacts. In addition to the default values used, several assumptions relevant to model inputs for short-term construction emission estimates were as follows: The project will be built in 6 phases, with each phase taking approximately 5 months to construct; Construction of Phase I will begin in August 2006. Four months after the start of Phase 1 construction, Phase 2 construction will begin. Construction of Phases 2 through 6 will occur at two month intervals after the start of the prior phase. Since construction of the project will occur in phases, it is possible that prior phases of the project could be in operation while construction of the later phases is occurring. Therefore, the maximum short-term emissions were calculated. Based on this calculation all criteria pollutant emissions from construction of this project are below the SCAQMD recommended regional daily short-term thresholds. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-7 z"s Conetrdottp�i �'erh s t" a m>sslo onii�'= < Month/Phase Peak Daily Emissions (Ib/day) ROG NO, CO SO, PM10 April 2006 4.34 34.49 31.40 0.00 3.55 Phase 1 Construction May -July 2006 4.00 30.06 29.91 0.00 1.35 Phase 1 Construction August 2006 Phase 1 & 2 64.45 59.30 66.47 0.00 6.46 Construction September 2006 Phase I Operation & 8.72 34.51 62.05 0.03 3.92 Phase 2 Construction Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-7 ha r i w sflm Cons �Vlonih ` z �....... . tell Wrlichon`Tffi s9 ons�Tet .,.......�.,, tj .,., s�F ,�.�.,.F.. �....�,:... ,.. Month/Phase Peak Daily Emissions (Ib/day) ROG NOx CO SO, PM10 October 2006 Phase I Operation Phase 2 Construction 13.05 69.02 93.30 0.03 7.08 Phase 3 Construction November 2006 Phase I Operation Phase 2 Construction 12.72 64.58 92.71 0.03 5.27 Phase 3 Construction December 2006 Phase I Operation Phase 2 Construction 68.67 93.89 129.14 0.03 9.99 Phase 3 Construction Phase 4 Construction January 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation 17.88 68.20 128.57 0.06 7.98 Phase 3 Construction Phase 4 Construction February 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Construction 68.65 95.15 165.26 0.06 10.11 Phase 4 Construction Phase 5 Construction March 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 21.61 70.36 153.10 0.07 9.98 Phase 4 Construction Phase 5 Construction April 2007 Phase I Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 72.37 98.70 189.85 0.07 11.84 Phase 4 Construction Phase 5 Construction Phase 6 Construction Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Operational Impacts Long-term emissions are evaluated at buildout for the completed project at the end of construction and are summarized in Table 5-2, below. Operational emissions refer to on -road motor vehicle emissions from project buildout. Area Source emissions include stationary combustion emissions of natural gas used for space and water heating, yard and landscape maintenance, and consumer use Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-9 r k I � ^` �shmated CRasf>tuehpn �misstonsP�r�kionth` ,� , Month/Phase Peak Daily Emissions (Ib/day) ROG NO, CO s0, PM10 May 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 25.34 73.79 177.53 0.08 12.10 Phase 4 Operation Phase 5 Construction Phase 6 Construction June 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 60.18 69.20 181.71 0.08 12.87 Phase 4 Operation Phase 5 Construction Phase 6 Construction July 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 24.20 47.60 165.72 0.09 12.46 Phase 4 Operation Phase 5 Operation Phase 6 Construction August 2007 Phase 1 Operation Phase 2 Operation Phase 3 Operation 53.26 43.02 169.96 0.09 12.84 Phase 4 Operation Phase 5 Operation Phase 6 Construction SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No Operational Impacts Long-term emissions are evaluated at buildout for the completed project at the end of construction and are summarized in Table 5-2, below. Operational emissions refer to on -road motor vehicle emissions from project buildout. Area Source emissions include stationary combustion emissions of natural gas used for space and water heating, yard and landscape maintenance, and consumer use Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-9 r k I of solvents and personal care products. URBEMIS2002 computes operational and area source emissions based upon default factors and land use assumptions for each project. Emissions from project operation will be less than the SCAQMD recommended regional thresholds. Estimated Dally Project O.peYatt`on Emtssrons Activity Year Peak Daily Emissions (Ib/day) ROG NOx CO SO, PM10 Summer Phase 1 4.71 3.01 32.01 0.03 2.56 Phase 2 5.18 3.32 35.24 0.03 2.82 Phase 3 3.75 2.35 24.68 0.01 2.12 Phase 4 3.75 2.35 24.68 0.01 2.12 Phase 5 2.84 1.76 18.70 0.01 1.59 Phase 6 2.39 1.47 15.72 0.01 1.32 Total 22.62 14.26 151.03 0.1 12.53 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No Winter Phase 1 4.38 4.44 29.62 0.03 2.57 Phase 2 4.83 4.90 32.69 0.03 2.83 Phase 3 3.46 3.45 22.67 0.01 2.12 Phase 4 3.46 3.45 22.67 0.01 2.12 Phase 5 2.6 2.59 17.00 0.01 1.59 Phase 6 2.16 2.16 14.17 0.01 1.33 Total 20.89 20.99 138.82 0.1 12.56 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-10 CO Hotspot Analysis Where Level of Service (LOS) is negatively impacted, CO can become a localized problem ("hotspot") requiring additional analysis beyond total project emissions quantification. A CO d hotspot is a localized concentration of CO that is above the state or federal 1 -hour or 8 -hour ambient air quality standards. Localized high levels of CO are associated with traffic congestion and idling or slow moving vehicles. The SCAQMD recommends that projects with sensitive receptors or a projects that could negatively affect LOS of existing roads use the screening procedures outlined in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Qualify Handbook (SCAQMD 1993) to determine the potential to create a CO hotspot. The threshold that necessitates a CO hotspot analysis is exceeded when the volume to capacity ratio increases by 2% for any intersection with an LOS rating of D or worse, or when an intersection LOS decreases from an LOS C to LOS D or worse. The traffic study for the Village at Lakeshore indicates that the study intersections currently operate at LOS ranging from A to F during peak hours. Taking into account the project as well as area -wide development, the LOS of study intersections will range from A to F in 2008. However, with the U incorporation of the improvements listed in the traffic study, all area intersections will operate at LOS A to D in 2008. Four intersections within The Village at Lakeshore project area require a CO Hotspot analysis: Machado Street/Grand Avenue, SR-74/Lakeshore Drive, SR-74/Lincoln Street, and Grand Avenue/SR-74. Although these intersections will operate at acceptable levels per the City of Lake Elsinore, they exceed the SCAQMD thresholds that trigger a CO Hotspot analysis as discussed above. CALINE4 was run for 2008 (buildout year) using the peak evening rush-hour traffic counts in the project -specific traffic study and default worst-case meteorology. Each intersection was evaluated in three scenarios: existing conditions without the project, existing conditions with the project, and existing conditions with the project with cumulative development (which considered area -wide approved projects). Emission factors for CO were estimated from the output of the BURDEN module of EMFAC2002. This module estimates area -wide (such as county wide) emissions from motor vehicles by vehicle class (e.g. passenger cars, light-duty trucks, etc.) and provides estimates of total daily vehicle -miles - traveled (VMT) by vehicle class within the geographic area. The ratio of the daily total CO I emissions for 2008 for Riverside County and the daily total vehicle miles traveled were used to calculate a fleet -average emission factor in grams per mile traveled for 2008 (8). e Receptors were located a distance of 3 meters from the roadway intersection, which reflects the "mixing zone" for CO concentrations. The predicted peak 1 -hour CO concentrations at each receptor were determined by adding the ambient background 1 -hour CO concentrations to the modeledI -hour CO concentration. The background CO concentrations were supplied by SCAQMD. the CO hotspot analysis results are shown on Table 5-3. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-11 Table 5 3 '` CO, I3otspot Abalysrs Results Parameter 1 -Hour CO Concentration (ppm) 8 -Hour CO Concentration (ppm) Existing Project Cumulative Existing Project Cumulative CAAQS 20 20 20 9 9 9 NAAQS 35 35 35 9.5 9.5 9.5 Grand Avenue/ 5.1 5.1 5.1 3.4 3.4 3.4 Machado Street SR -74/ 5A 5.5 5.8 3.6 3.7 3.9 Lincoln Street SR -74/ 5.3 5.3 5.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 Lakeshore Drive Grand Avenue/ 5.3 5.3 5.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 SR -74 The highest peak 1 -hour CO concentration in the project plus cumulative condition occurs at SR- 74/Lincoln Street, located approximately 0.75 miles northeast of the project site. The peak 1 -hour CO concentration with background is 5.8 ppm, less than 30% of the CAAQS and approximately 16% of the NAAQS. The peak 8 -hour CO concentration was estimated by multiplying the peak 1 -hour model estimate by the persistence factor for the project and adding the ambient background 8 -hour CO concentration. The persistence factor is the ratio between the maximum 1 -hour and 8 -hour measured CO concentration. Since meteorological data is available, the persistence factor was calculated to be 0.67. The peak CO hotspot concentrations at receptors for all intersections modeled are well below the CAAQS and NAAQS. Therefore, the project will not cause either the CAAQS or NAAQS for CO emissions to be exceeded and will not form any CO hotspots in the project area. A) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) sets forth a comprehensive program that will lead the SCAB into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. The AQMP control measures and related emission reduction estimates are based upon emissions projections for a future development scenario derived from land use, population, and employment characteristics defined in consultation with local governments. Accordingly, conformance with the AQMP for development projects is determined by demonstrating compliance with local land use plans and/or population projections. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-12 The project area is zoned Commercial Park in the current Lake Elsinore General Plan. While the project's proposed land use is not consistent with that which was incorporated into the AQMP, the development of single family residences/condominiums will have a less -polluting effect than the land use originally planned in to the AQMP due to the lower automobile trips generated by residential versus commercial land uses. The main sources of operational emissions from theproject are from vehicles coming to and from the project site. The proposed project will generate approximately 1,265 automobile trips per day (146 dwelling units trip generation rate of 8.67). If the site were developed with commercial uses and ten percent of the 20 acres were developed as such, then the daily trips generated by the project would be 5,958 (871,200 sq. ft./1000*68.39). Since the project will result in fewer vehicle trips than what is proposed in the General Plan, the project's long-term operational emissions would be less than what was anticipated by the AQMP. Therefore, the project will not obstruct or conflict with the applicable air quality plan. B) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an ° existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The short-term and long-term construction emissions from this project were modeled usingURBEMIS2002. Since project specific information was not available at the time of this analysis, the model was run using the default values in URBEMIS, which represent the worse -case construction scenario. Constructionwasassumedtotake 33 months with the whole site to be developed at once. The default values in URBEMIS were used for construction based on the development of 20 acres of vacant land into 146 single-family attached residential units. Maximum short-term daily emissions are 72.37 lbs for ROG, 98.70 lbs for NOx, 189.85 lbs for CO, 0.09 lbs for SO2, and 12.87 lbs for PM10. Short-term emissions of all criteria air pollutants are less than the SCAQMD established regional and localized thresholds. The maximum daily long-term emissions are 22.62 lbs. for ROG, 14.26 lbs for NOx, 151.03 lbs for CO, 0.10 lbs for SO2, and 12.53 lbs for PM10 in summer and 20.89 lbs for ROG, 20.99 lbs for NOx, 138.82 lbs. for CO, 0.10 lbs for SO2, and 12.56 lbs for PM10 in winter. Emissions of all criteria pollutants are below the SCAQMD thresholds, therefore the long-term air quality impacts are considered less than significant. C) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. The portion of the South Coast Air Basin within which the project is located is designated as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM 10 under state standards, and as a non -attainment area for ozone, carbon monoxide, PM 10, and PM2.5 under federal standards. The preceding analysis demonstrates that the project's projected emissions are below the applicable SCAQMD thresholds. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-13 E i 4 In evaluating the cumulative effects of the project, Section 21100(e) of CEQA states that "previously approved land use documents including, but not limited to, general plans, specific plans, and local coastal plans, may be used in cumulative impact analysis." In addressing cumulative effects for air quality, the AQMP utilizes approved general plans and, therefore, is the most appropriate document to use to evaluate cumulative impacts of the subject project. This is because the AQMP evaluated air quality emissions for the entire south coast air basin using a future development scenario based on general plan land use designations and set forth a comprehensive program that would lead the region, including the project area, into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. Since the project is in compliance with the AQMP and both the short-term and long-term emissions are less than the SCAQMD established regional and localized thresholds, it is appropriate to conclude that the project's incremental contribution to criteria pollutant emissions is not cumulatively considerable. D) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. Currently, there are sensitive receptors in the project area in the form of residential developments. In addition, Lakeside High School is located adjacent to the northeast of the project site. Since the short-term impacts related to construction of the project and the long-term emissions related to project operation do not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance, the project is not expected to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. E) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The project presents the potential for generation of objectionable odors in the form of diesel exhaust during construction in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Recognizing the short-term duration and quantity of emissions in the project area, the project will not expose substantial numbers of people to objectionable odors. Impacts from short-term construction odors are considered less than significant. Long-term impacts related to project operation are not expected to be significant as the creation of objectionable odors is not common in residential land uses. MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 The proposed project shall include suppression measures for fugitive dust and those associated with construction equipment in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and other AQMD requirements. Prior to the issuance of construction permits, the project applicant shall include a note on all grading plans which requires the construction contractor to implement the following measures during grading. These measures shall also be discussed at the pre -construction meeting. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-14 a. Application of extra water during clearing, grading and construction capable of achieving a minimum 12 percent soil moisture in the top 6 -inch soil stratum. b. Termination of soil disturbance during the occurrence of high winds (>25 mph). C. Minimization of construction interference with regional non -project traffic movement. Measures recommended for inclusion are: Scheduling receipt of construction materials to non -peak travel periods. Routing site access traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity. Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods. d. Reducing "spill-over" effects by preventing soil erosion, washing vehicles entering public roadways from dirt off-road project areas, and washing/sweeping project access to public roadways on an adequate schedule. e. Requiring emissions control from on-site equipment through a routine mandatory program of low -emissions tune-ups. f. During construction, mobile construction equipment will be properly maintained at an offsite location, which includes proper tuning and timing of engines. Equipment maintenance records and equipment design specification data sheets shall be kept on- site during construction. g. Prohibit all vehicles from idling in excess of ten minutes, both on-site and off-site. It. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. i. Incorporating mitigation strategies into the final design specifications. j. Conducting periodic site surveillance by a mitigation monitor during grading to verify that the dust mitigation plan is being optimally implemented. k. The Construction Contractor shall reduce the emissions associated with architectural coatings by using precoated/natural building materials, low VOC paint, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high -transfer efficiency. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-15 H.4 Biological Resources A biological survey was conducted on the project site in June 2004 by Michael Brandman Associates. The biology study is summarized below and included in Appendix B of this document. ASSESSMENT The project site was previously used for agricultural operations and has been previously graded and disturbed by dry land farming and discing. Based on the findings of site-specific general and focused species-specific biological studies conducted by Michael Brandman Associates, (June 2004), the project site does not contain native and/or sensitive plant species, any native and/or sensitive wildlife species, riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities within the project site. Further, the project site does not contain any jurisdictional waters or wildlife corridors. A) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts to any species listed as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in any local, regional, state or federal plans, policies or regulations. Based, on the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator, the site is not located in an MSHCP designated survey area for any narrow endemic or criteria area plant species. In addition, no habitat assessments are required for any additional wildlife species, including burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). Therefore, further surveys for sensitive plant or sensitive wildlife species in accordance with the MSHCP are not required. Mitigation Measure 4.1 has been included to ensure compliance with MSHCP requirements. B) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact. The CDFG regulates alterations to stream courses including adjacent riparian habitat areas under Section 1600 of the state Fish and Game Code. During a field survey conducted on May28, 2004 by Michael Brandman Associates, no jurisdictional features were identified within the project site. In addition, no riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities were identified within the impact area. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in any impacts to these types of habitats. at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study C) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to, marsh vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less That Significant Impact. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulate discharge of fill into waters oftheUnited States under Section 404 and 401 of the federal Clean Water Act, respectively. During a field survey conducted on May 28, 2004 by Michael Brandman Associates, no jurisdictional features were identified within the project site. No wetlands exist within the impact area. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. D) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or l migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? r Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) protects all common wild birds found in the United States except the house sparrow, starling, feral pigeon, and resident game birds such as pheasant, grouse, quail, and wild turkey. Resident game birds are managed separately by each state. The MBTA makes it unlawful for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell, trade, ship, import or export any migratory bird including feathers, parts, nests or eggs. California Fish and Game (CFG) Code 3503 makes it illegal to destroy any birds' nest or any birds' eggs that are protected under the MBTA. Code 3503.5 further protects all birds in the orders Falconiformes and Strigiformes (birds of prey, such as hawks and owls) and their eggs and nests from any form of take. The project site is not a part of any wildlife movement corridor. However, the project site contains several large trees and shrubs that could provide suitable nest sites for avian species. As a result, Mitigation Measure 4.2, has been incorporated into the proposed project to ensure that impacts are less than significant. 1 E) Would the project conflict with any local applicable policies protecting biological resources? No Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore has a Significant Palm Tree Ordinance, which requires a permit prior to removal or relocation of any significant palm trees. According to the definition in the ordinance, "Significant palms" means the species ofthe Family Palmaceae set forth herein below which, unless specifically provided otherwise, exceed five feet in height measured from the ground at the base of the trunk to the base of the crown: Phoenix Canariensis Washingtonia Filifara Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-17 • Washingtonia Robusta • Trachycarpus • Chamaerops • Phoenix Reclinata • Butia Capitata • Phoenix Roebelenii Based on MBA's MSHCP analysis, the palm species Medemia nobilis is located on the project site. However this palm is not listed as a significant palm according to the City's ordinance. F) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other applicable habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is located within the Western Riverside MSHCP. As a result, Michael Brandman Associates prepared an MSHCP Compliance Survey to determine potential impacts to the MSHCP and is summarized below. The project site is located within the Elsinore Area Plan but is not located within a Criteria Cell. The closest MSHCP conservation area, Cleveland National Forest, occurs approximately one mile west of the Site. Sensitive Plant Species Potential impacts to sensitive plants known to occur in the vicinity of the project site are fully covered by the Western Riverside County MSHCP. The Site is not located in an MSHCP designated survey area for any narrow endemic or criteria area plant species, based on the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator. Therefore, no further surveys for sensitive plant species are required on the project site. Sensitive Wildlife Species Potential impacts to sensitive wildlife species known to occur in the vicinity of the project site are fully covered by the Western Riverside County MSHCP. In addition, no habitat assessments are required for any additional wildlife species, based on the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator, including burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). Therefore, further surveys for sensitive wildlife species are not required. Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Section 6.1.2 of the MSI4CP requires an assessment of the potentially significant effects of aproject on covered species occupying riparian/riverine areas and vernal pools. This in an independent analysis from the consideration given to waters of the United States (U.S.) and waters of the State Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-18 under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and California Fish and Game Code. Elements of riparian scrub occur in several isolated stands within Parcel 1, including species such as mulefat, red willow, and tamarisk (Tamarix sp.). However, this vegetation is not associated with any drainage features within the Parcel, and is most likely supported by broken irrigation lines or other subsurface sources of water. The vegetation stands provide low -quality habitat and do not constitute a functioning riverinehiparian system capable of supporting any of the species listed in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, including riparian birds such as least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), or western yellowbilled cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis). Therefore, no riparian/riverine habitat occurs on the project site. No potential veinal pools, including ephemeral ponds, were observed on the project site during the field survey. The Site has been subject to long-term disking associated with dry -land fanning and is dominated by ruderal plant species. In addition, based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey for Western Riverside County, the Site is dominated by sandy loam soils and no clay soils occur onsite. Given these factors, no vernal pool habitat is present onsite. Wildlife Corridors/Linakges Wildlife movement corridors, or linkages, link together areas of suitable wildlife habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. The project site is not located within a linkage as defined by the MSHCP. Currently, Parcel 1 is surrounded by development and, therefore, does not provide a significant corridor for wildlife movement. Urban/Wildlands Interface Analysis Parcel 1 of the Tomlinson Property is located at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive in an area surrounded by development. The nearest open space occurs within the Elsinore Mountains adjacent to the Cleveland National Forest. This open space area falls under the Rural Mountainous Designation within the MSHCP Plan Area and is located about one mile west of Parcel 1, separated by Grand Avenue and residential development. As a result, development of the Site is not likely to impact the urban/wildlands interface and a detailed urban/wildlands interface analysis is not recommended. Compliance with the County's MSHCP mitigation fee will ensure that there are no impacts to the MSHCP. MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall pay the County of Riverside's MSHCP mitigation fee, in accordance with the guidelines of the MSIICP's IA. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-19 4.2 Removal of any trees, shrubs or any other potential nesting habitat (i.e. squirrel burrows), should be conducted outside the nesting season (generally between February and August), to the extent feasible. If trees are to be removed during the nesting season, prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall have a breeding bird survey conducted by a qualified biologist to identify any potential nesting activities. If the bird survey identifies any project -related disturbance of active nests (directly or indirectly, i.e., noise), the project applicant shall coordinate with California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and obtain any necessary approvals to continue construction. 0.0 Cu/tura/ Resources A historical/archaeological resources survey report was prepared for the proposed project by CRM TECH in October 14, 2004. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix C of this document. ASSESSMENT Record Search According to records on file at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), the project area had not been surveyed systematically for cultural resources prior to this study. However, during a 1981-1982 countywide historical resource reconnaissance sponsored by the Riverside County Historical Commission, a Spanish -style single-family residence estimated to have been built around 1933 was recorded within the project boundaries at 32789 Riverside Drive. The residence was accompanied by a three-story observation tower from which the ranch foreman could oversee the field workers, a feature more commonly found in the Coachella Valley. Also recorded on the property were a garage and at least one shed. At the time of the 1981-1982 reconnaissance, this ranch house complex was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, although no reasons were specified for that determination other than the fact that the house was considered "typical of Mediterranean/Spanish architecture." Outside the project boundaries but within a one -mile radius, EIC records show at least 17 previous cultural resources studies covering various tracts of land and linear features. These and other similar studies in the vicinity resulted in the identification of three archaeological sites, six isolates, and eight additional built environment features within the scope of the records search. Two of the archaeological sites were prehistoric, and included a village site and a resource processing site. The other archaeological site was recorded as a historic -period truck trail in the nearby mountains. The isolates were mostly prehistoric groundstone or chipped stone artifacts. The eight built environmental features recorded within the scope of the records search included six historic -period bungalows and ranch houses, as well as the Ortega Highway and two rows of landscaping trees lining a local street. With the exception of the ranch house complex at 32789 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-20 Riverside Drive, none of the previously recorded cultural resources were located in the immediate vicinity of the project area, and thus none of them required further consideration. Historic Research Results According to historic maps, the general vicinity of the project location showed clear signs of human activities in the mid -19th century, and the project area itself was apparently settled upon at least by the late 1890s. In the 1850s -1880s, the U.S. government conducted a series of land surveys in the Elsinore Valley. As a part of a confirmed private land grant, the project area and its immediate vicinity were not surveyed, but the surveyors' observations indicate a road traversing a short distance to the west and a settler's house approximately a half -mile to the southwest of the project area. In 1897-1898, the forerunners of today's Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive had come into being along the southwestern and southeastern project boundaries, respectively, and at least one building had appeared in the project area, located near the northeastern corner and adjacent to Riverside Drive. Four decades later, the project area remained occupied by one building, but the location of the building was indicated to be near the nor -then tip of the property, away from Riverside Drive. The location is clearly different from that of the building noted in 1897-1898, but matches that of the residence recorded in 1981-1982 at 32789 Riverside Drive, which was constructed around 1933, as mentioned above. No other man-made features were known to be within the project area, based on the historic maps. Field Survey Despite the findings from the records search and the historical research, the field survey encountered no buildings, structures, sites, features, or artifact deposits more than 50 years of age, Neither the residence at 32789 Riverside Drive nor any of its ancillary buildings remains inexistence today, and none of them has left any identifiable archaeological remains. A well, a low brick wall, and a concrete sidewalk were noted on the property during the survey, along with a scatter of modem trash and building debris, such as broken pieces of concrete and bricks. The brick wall, located near the intersection of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, may be a remnant of the ranch complex that has been demolished, but is clearly modern in origin. The sidewalk and the various features associated with the well also appear to be modern. These modern, minor features with no particular historic, artistic, or aesthetic values are not considered potential historical/archaeological resources, and thus were not recorded during the survey. SB 18 Tribal Consultation Per SB 18, a letter was sent on September 26, 2005 all Tribes that were recommended by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two Tribes responded, including the Pala Band of Mission Indians and the Pechanga Indian Reservation, Temecula Band of Luisefio Mission Indians. The Pala Band of Mission Indians indicated that they did not have any comments at this time. The Pechanga Tribe Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-21 recommended the inclusion of mitigation measures to ensure that no unique or irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luiseno village sites, are disturbed during grading activities. Mitigation Measures 5.2 and 5.3 have been incorporated into the proposed project pursuant to this request. As a result DO significant impacts are anticipated. A) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact. A group of historic period buildings were previously recorded on the project site, however, following a field survey it was determined that there are no identifiable archaeological remains in existence. Several minor features of built environment were noted on the property during the study, but all of them appear to be of modern origin and no historical/archaeological value. Based on these findings, and in light of the criteria listed above, the present study concludes that no historical resources exist within or adjacent to the project area. B) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. There are no known archeological, paleontological or historical sites located on the proposed site. In order to protect any archaeological resources that may be discovered during grading, on-site monitoring will be required, as discussed below. C) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. There are no known archeological, paleontological or historical sites located on the proposed site. In order to protect any paleontological resources that maybe discovered during grading, on-site monitoring will be required, as discussed below. D) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal ceremonies? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. There are no known human remains on or near the project site. However, if human remains are discovered during grading activities, then the mitigation measure listed will ensure that any resources found are protected. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5.22 MITIGATION MEASURES 5.1 Prior to issuance of the first preliminary or precise grading permit, and for any subsequent permit involving excavation to increased depth, the applicant shall provide letters from an archaeologist and/or paleontologist. The letters shall state that these individuals have been retained by the applicant, and that the consultant(s) will be on call during all grading and other significant ground disturbing activities. These consultants shall be selected from the roll of qualified archaeologists and paleontologists maintained by the County of Riverside. The archaeologist and/orpaleontologist shall meet with the Planning and Development staff, and shall submit written recommendations specifying procedures for cultural/scientific resource surveillance. These recommendations shall have been reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Development prior to issuance of the grading permits and prior to any surface disturbance on the project site. Should any cultural/scientific resources be discovered, no further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Director of Planning and Development is satisfied that adequate provisions are in place to protect these resources. 5.2 In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains in anylocation other than a dedicated cemetery, the following steps shall be taken: a. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the Riverside County Coroner is contacted to determine if the remains are prehistoric and that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American, then the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours, and the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendent may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, or b. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner orhis authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the Most Likely Descendant or on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance: The Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a Most Likely Descendent or the Most Likely Descendent failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-23 I The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. 5.3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall to enter into a Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. This Agreement shall address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be uncovered during construction as well as provisions for Tribal monitors. a. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground -breaking activities within native soils in the Tribe's aboriginal territory, including further surveys, to be compensated by the project applicant. The Pechanga Tribal monitors will have the authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeological monitor and the Lead Agency. b. The landowner shall agree to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all Luiseno sacred items, burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition. C. All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and preserved. S. 6 Geology and Soiia The following is a summary of a geotechnical analysis and fault study prepared by Southern California Geotechnical, hie, for the proposed project on July 28, 2004 and August 17, 2004, respectively. These studies are included in Appendix D of this document. ASSESSMENT Fault Trenching Fault Trench 1 (a total of 49 feet long and 35 feet wide) was excavated across the central portion of the project site to a maximum depth of approximately 18.5 feet below the ground surface with an orientation of N 40° E. This orientation is roughly perpendicular to the mapped orientation of the Wildomar Branch of the Elsinore fault zone. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-24 Site -Specific Geology The project site is underlain by artificial fill and alluvial soils. A description of the units encountered on the site is presented below. Topsoil/Root Mat A surficial layer of topsoil/root mat material was encountered at all of the boring and trench locations. This material generally consists of silty fine to medium sand with moderate organic content. At the boring and trench locations, this material was observed to be 4 to 6± inches in thickness. Artificial Fill Artificial fill soils identified in the northern portion of the project site extend to depths of I%to 10± feet below existing grade. These soils generally consist of medium stiff to fine sandy clays, and loose to medium dense clayey fine sands and silty sands. Additional soils classified as possible fill were observed below the fill in some locations, and consist of medium dense clayey fine to medium sands. These possible fill soils possess some indicators of fill but also resemble the underlying native soils. A 4 -inch PVC pipe was identified in the fill area and probably was used for irrigation during the past use of the property. Alluvial Soils Beneath the artificial fill soils, younger alluvial soils were encountered. The younger alluvial soils that were encountered generally possess lower densities, and are more porous than older alluvial soils. These soils generally consist of silty to clayey fine to medium sands, and occasional fine sandy r silts, and fine to medium sands, extending to depths of at least 50± feet. The upper portions of the alluvial soils are loose to medium dense, dry to damp, and slightly porous within the upper 5 to 10± feet. Below a depth of 10± feet, the alluvial soils generally possess medium dense to very dense relative to densities, and damp to wet apparent moisture contents. Groundwater Very moist to wet soils were encountered during drilling of most of the borings at depths of 6.5 to 17± feet. Delayed readings taken within the open boreholes identified free water at depths of 8 to 17.5± feet. Based on the observed groundwater levels within the borings and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table is considered to have existed at depths of 8 to 17.5± feet at the time of subsurface exploration. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-25 Seepage from groundwater was observed on site at elevation 1,273 and at elevation 1,265. The change in groundwater elevation over a small horizontal distance has created a relatively steep groundwater gradient which would be expected adjacent to a fault acting as a ground water barrier. During the original geotechnical investigation, groundwater data for the subject site was obtained. This groundwater data suggests that a northwest -trending ground water barrier is present on the project site. This groundwater barrier is associated with the suspected northwest extension of the Wildomar Fault. A steep groundwater gradient or seepage zone adjacent to the expected ground water barrier was encountered during the fault investigation exploration in the north central portion of the project site. The groundwater is suspected to propagate along the Wildomar Fault. Therefore, the Wildomar Fault is considered to exist at a depth directly below the groundwater barrier. Due to the groundwater seepage, the exploratory fault trench was limited to 18%2+ feet in depth for stability concerns. The groundwater seepage also precluded direct examination of the fault trace. Faulting and Seismicity The project site is not located within a designated earthquake fault zone as defined by the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the Glen Ivy North branch of the Elsinore fault zone located approximately 13/4 miles north-northwest of the subject site. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, all new construction within the Fault Rupture Hazard Zone will be preceded by a fault trenching investigation to determine the presence of on-site strands of any active or potentially active fault and to determine the need for a structural setback. , The Elsinore fault zone is a right -lateral strike -slip fault approximately 110 miles in length. Information presented by the Southern California Earthquake Center has assigned the following parameters to the Elsinore Fault: Length: 180 km Slip Rate: 4.0 mm/year Recurrence Interval: 250 years The northwest -trending Wildomar branch of the Elsinore fault zone was mapped as buried and traversing the site northeast of the subject property. The State of California, Special Study Zones Map for the Elsinore Quadrangle shows the northwest terminus of the Wildomar fault located approximately miles southeast of the site. Previous studies have shown that the Elsinore fault zone isactive. The Wildomar Branch of the Elsinore fault zone probably extended beneath Lake Elsinore. There is positive evidence that a potentially active fault (Wildomar fault) transects the subject site. During the historical air photo review, a depression, parallel to the mapped trace of the Wildomar fault, trending in thenorthwest-southeast direction was apparent on the subject site. This depression could represent a graben associated with an active fault. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-26 A fault study was done to determine the location of the Wildomar fault and is shown on Exhibit 5-3. A 50 -foot structural setback distance for habitable structures on each side of the fault has been determined. As shown on the exhibit, no habitable structures are planned for development within the 50 -foot structural setback area. The site plan would allow for development of a storage area, recreational area, and pool/spa area within the setback zone. The presence of the Wildomar fault will not cause significant impact due to the absence of habitable structures within the 50 foot setback area. A) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Fault rupture occurs when an active fault displaces in two separate directions during an earthquake. Concern about the growing number of structures located on or near active and potentially active faults let the state of California to enact the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zone act of 1972. The Act was revised in 1975 and renamed the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act. Sudden surface rupture from severe earthquakes can cause extensive property damage, but even the slow movement known as "fault creep" can cause displacement that results in offset or disfiguring of curbs, streets, and buildings. The project site is not located within a designated earthquake fault zone as defined by the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the Glen Ivy North branch of the Elsinore fault zone located approximately 13/4 miles north-northwest of the subject site. However, the fault study prepared for the project site found evidence to suggest the presence of an active or a potentially active fault on the subject site known as the Wildomar fault. The location of the fault is shown on previous Exhibit 5-3. Impacts related to rupture of the fault zone are mitigated to a level of less than significant by the incorporation of a 50 foot structural setback from the fault location and compliance with the latest Uniform Building Code. As shown on previous Exhibit 5-3, no habitable structures are planned for development within the structural setback zone. As a result, impacts related to rupture of a fault zone will be mitigated to a level less than significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-27 �+ Z `� :i p d, `_; �Q �0 J � V 4 W J 0 d s � Q n r U � o d � o c m ,N h m w m � � y .� .? J ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would be subject to groundshaking during a seismic event from the above mentioned faults. Project -specific impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level through compliance with the latest Uniform Building Code and recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association of California for seismically resistive design of structures. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Liquefaction is defined as the transformation of a granular material from a solid state into a liquefied state as a consequence of increased pore water pressure. Groundshaking resulting from an earthquake is capable of providing the mechanism for liquefaction, usually in saturated, loose, medium- to fine-grained sands, silty sands, and certain types of clayey soils. The likelihood of liquefaction occurring depends on many factors including differences in the compaction of soils layers, nature of the soil, depth of the deposits, and depth of the water table. As discussed above, based on soils that occur on-site there is a potential for liquefaction beneath the site. Project -specific impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level through compliance with the latest Uniform Building Code, and/or recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association of California for seismically resistive design of structures. iv) Landslides? No Impact. The proposed project site is relatively flat is and landsliding is considered unlikely on the project site. B) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Short-term impacts related to soil erosion will result from excavation and grading required for project development. However, erosion control measures will be incorporated into the proposed project. (See Mitigation Measures in Section 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality) C) Is the project located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. As stated above, the proposed project site has the potential for liquefaction. However, compliance with the latest Uniform Building Code, and/or recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association of California for seismically resistive design of structures will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-29 D) Is the project located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located above shallow groundwater. Compliance with the most recent UBC will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. E) Does the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed project site will be served by the existing sewer system and will not require the installation of septic tanks or an alternative waste waster disposal system. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, the project applicant shall submit a detailed geotechnical report to establish the site-specific design parameters and foundation design for the proposed project. The report will provide specific recommendations on stabilization including buttressing, keying, caissons, or similardesign approaches consistent with the site specific conditions. The detailed geotechnical report shall be subject to review and approval by the Building Services manager or his designee. No building or grading permit shall be issued until the report has been approved by the City and any grading or building plans are consistent with the design recommendations of the report. 6.2 All grading operations shall be conducted in conformance with the applicable City of Lake Elsinore Grading Ordinance, the most recent version of the Uniform Building Code, and consistent with the recommendations included in the site geologic reports entitled Fault Study 336 Unit Residential Development: Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California forClassic Pacific, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., August 17, 2004 (Appendix D) and Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 336 Residential Development, Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore California, July28, 2004. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-30 H.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the proposed project by Southern California Geotechnical on November 4, 2004. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix E of this document. ASSESSMENT Past Property Uses The project site was previouslyused for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1980. Prior to 1983 and after 1980 the site was used as a nursery. The nurserywas demolished in 1992 and the site has remained vacant of any major structures since that time. Review of historic aerial photographs indicates the presence of a single family residence structure in the northeast comer of the project site during the 1960's through the 1980's. The structure was demolished in 1992. Findings No evidence of hazardous substances, environmental mismanagement, underground storage tanks (USTs) or other adverse environmental conditions were observed during the site reconnaissance of the subject site or the immediately adjacent properties. Based on the site reconnaissance, there is no evidence to suggest that the soil and/or groundwater of the subject site property has been impacted with hazardous substances. The subject site is located within an area primarily developed with residential and commercial properties. Only one of the immediately adjacent properties currently operates USTs. The Butterfield Village mobile home park is located across Riverside Drive and is hydrogeologically down gradient from the subject site. Therefore, it is unlikely for this facility to potentially impact the subject site. Four (4) Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) sites have been identified within 1/8 mile radius of the subject site. All of the releases are indicated to have only affected the soil and not the groundwater. The substances released were removed from the location by Riverside County Fire Department. There is no evidence to suggest that these ERNS sites have adversely impacted the environmental conditions at the subject site. The future Lakeside High School, located 0.01 mile northeast of the subject site, was investigated by the DTSC as part of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment. The PEA concludes that there is no evidence to suggest that this facility has impacted the soil or groundwater of the subject site. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-31 Three (3) leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites have been identified within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject site. Closure letters have been issued for two of the sites indicating that no further action is necessary. Investigation is on-going at the third site which is located 0.36 miles southeast of the subject site. This release is indicated to have affected the soil only. There is no evidence to suggest that this facility has impacted the soils or groundwater of the subject site. Furthermore, the responsible party at this site has been identified and there is no significant likelihood that the owners of the subject site will be involved in a cleanup action at this LUST site. The two underground storage tanks (USTs) that were previously present on the project site have been removed. The USTs consisted of one 1,000 -gallon gasoline UST and one 1,000 gallon diesel UST. A report prepared by ICG Hydrotech observed the removal of the storage tanks and also tested the soil surrounding the former USTs. ICG Hydrotech issued a report to the County of Riverside Environmental Health Department. The County of Riverside Environmental Health Department determined that no significant contamination existed at the subject site and that no further site mitigation would be required. A closure letter was issued on May 15, 1990, indicating that no further action is required. A) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. The project consists of residential development and willnotinvolve 1 the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. During construction activities, a limited amount of hazardous materials typical of construction will be present on site. These include diesel fuel, gasoline, paints, equipment fluids, concrete, cleaning solutions and solvents, lubricant oils, adhesives, and chemical toilets. However, these potential impacts will be temporary and will i not result in a significant impact to the public or the environment. Further, in the event of an accidental spill existing federal and state standards are in place for the handling, storage and transport of these materials. In addition, prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare a Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SP&CP) to prevent runoff of potential petroleum product spills. This Plan will be submitted for review and approval of the appropriate jurisdictional agency and all construction crew members shall be trained in the requirements of the SP&CP. The Plan will include information on storage of hazardous materials, emergency response procedures, employee training requirements, fire safety, first-aid procedures, hazardous materials release containment/control procedures, and release reporting requirements. Additional special precautions would be taken during construction close to water bodies (flood control channel) to avoid accidental spills and contamination of water resources. With the implementation of this project design feature, impacts resulting from construction of the proposed projectwould be less than significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-32 B) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The project consists of residential development and will not involve the use of hazardous materials. Some hazardous materials will be utilized during construction ofthe project, including paints and gasoline. However, impacts would be temporary in nature and will not result in a significant hazard to the public. Further as discussed above an SP&CP will be maintained on site. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. C) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. The project consists of residential development and will not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The site is located adjacent to the Lakeside High School. Two USTs were previously removed from the northern portion of the project site. Although the County of Riverside Department of Health issued a closure letter in regards to the UST sites, residual contaminants may exist at depths of 10 to 20 feet at the removed UST locations. However, since grading activities are will be limited to five (5) feet below the existing ground surface, it is considered unlikely that any additional testing will be required due to grading activities. As a result, impacts related to hazardous materials are considered less than significant. D) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The project site is not listed as a hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As a result, the site will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. E) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-33 F) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The Skylark Airport is located approximately five miles southeast of the project site. The Skylark Airport is a private airstrip which mainly provides service for Skydive Elsinore. Aircraft departures for the dirt airstrip are minimal, and would not have the potential to expose residents to excessive noise levels. No mitigation measures are necessary. G) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The project will not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. H) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The proposed project is a development that is not designated as a high fire severity zone. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASURES 7.1 If soil or groundwater is encountered during site development that is suspected of being impacted by hazardous materials, work will be halted and site conditions will be evaluated by a qualified environmental professional. The results of the evaluation will be submitted to the County of Riverside Health Department and/or RWQCB, and the appropriate response/remedial measures will be implemented, as directed by County of Riverside Health Department, RWQCB, or other applicable oversight agency, until all specified requirements of the oversight agencies are satisfied and a no -further -action status is attained. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-34 g S.0 Hydrology and Water Quality The following is a summary of a Drainage Study and Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates on September and October of 2005, respectively. The study is included in its entirety in Appendix F of this document. ASSESSMENT Drainage Existing drainage facilities in the vicinity of the project site include the South Riverside Channel running along the tract boundary on the northwest and northeast side. An 80 -foot long double -pipe culvert consisting of two 24 -inch RCPs with a horizontal clearance of 2 feet between the pipes is located at the southwest corner of the project site. The double -pipe culvert starts at an existing sump catch basin located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. The culvert conveys runoff from the west side to the east side of Grand Avenue. Under existing conditions, storm runoff flows from northwest to southeast in the project area and surrounding area. The sump catch basin at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive receives runoff from adjacent Tract 10703 and a portion of Tract 32585. Runoff conveyed to the east side of Grand Avenue by the culvert runs along the south boundary of Tract 33267 and flows directly into the South Riverside Channel. Runoff from Tract 3 3267 also flows directly into the South Riverside Channel at the southeast corner of the tract. Storm runoff from the part of Tract 32585 southwest of Tract 33267 flows into a pit about 200 feet from the southwest corner of Tract 33267. An existing 90 -foot CMP culvert conveys water from the pit to the south boundary of Tract 33267, and flows directly into the South Riverside Channel. The proposed major drainage facility for this project consists of a storm drain main line along Riverside Drive and an on-site water quality basin. The upstream end of the storm drain main line is connected to the double pipes of the existing culvert on the east side of Grand Avenue. The downstream end is connected to the existing 12 x 5 foot RCB at the intersection of Riverside Drive and South Riverside Channel. The water quality basin receives water from a water qualitybranching pipe of the storm drain main line. The outlet pipe of the water quality basin is connected to the existing 12 x 5 foot RCB at the intersection of Riverside Drive and South Riverside Channel as well. Two mi -site catch basins are proposed to collect and convey on-site runoff to the storm drain main line. An offsite drop inlet and its associated lateral are proposed to collect and convey offsite runoff to the storm drain main line. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-35 Water Quality Receiving water for the proposed project discharge point is the Riverside County Flood Control Channel which flows directly into Lake Elsinore. Lake Elsinore is located at thetenninus of the San y Jacinto River watershed in southwestern Riverside County. Lake Elsinore is one of the few natural lakes in southern California. It was formed in a geologically active graben area and has been in existence over thousands of years. Due to the Mediterranean climate and watershed hydrology, lake level fluctuations in Lake Elsinore have been extreme, with alternate periods of a dry lakebed and extreme flooding. These drought/flood cycles have a great impact on lake water quality. Fish kills and excessive algal blooms have been reported in Lake Elsinore since the early 20th century. As a result, in 1994, the Santa Ana Regional Board placed Lake Elsinore on the 303(d) list of impaired waters due to excessive levels of nutrients. Lake Elsinore is also considered impaired for Organic Enrichment/Low Dissolved Oxygen, Sedimentation/Siltation, and Unknown Toxicity. Potential pollutants of concern that are expected from the proposed residential use include sediment/turbidity, nutrients, and pesticides, trash & debris, oxygen demanding substances, bacteria, viruses, oil and grease. In addition to requirements from Section 303 (d) of the Clean Water Act, there are also requirements relative to Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act which affect storm water runoff from the project. These requirements were created under a 1987 amendment to the Clean Water Act and require certain storm water discharges to obtain National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Permits are required for three general areas: municipal, industrial, and construction. The Environmental Protection Agency has delegated authority to issue these permits to the State Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). On October 25, 2002, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a municipal storm water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to the County of Riverside and 12 incorporated cities of Riverside County within the Santa Ana Region. As part of the NPDES permit the County of Riverside prepared the Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) which contains requirements for implementation of construction and new development Best Management Practices (BMPs). BMPs identified in the DAMP consist of structural and non structural BMPs. The DAMP requires new developments to implement appropriate `routine" structural and non structural BMPs. Routine structural BMPs are intended to address drainage water quality impacts inherent in development, and need not be related to any identif ed water quality problem. Examples of `routine" structural BMPs include filtration, common area runoff -minimizing landscape, energy dissipaters, inlet trash racks, and water quality inlets. The project site is currently undeveloped. Construction of the proposed project will result in an increase of impervious surfaces which would increase the rate of surface runoff. However the project includes the construction of a water quality basin with a diversion berm and bioswale. The Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study v 5-36 water quality basin is designed for first -flush water quality mitigation in compliance with NPDES Supplement "A." The following post -construction BMPs have been proposed: • Public education programs • Scheduled street sweeping • Catch basin stenciling • First Flush Water Quality Basin with debris fore -bay and bio-swale Grading activities have the potential to temporarily increase soil erosion. However, surface runoff impacts will be relatively short-term in duration and will be mitigated using standard runoff control measures such as silt barriers, sediment traps, and revegetation after construction. In addition, a water quality control basin has been incorporated into the proposed project which will be designed to capture and filter the first 3/4 -inch of hardscape runoff. Therefore, implementation of the mitigation measures listed below will reduce all potential construction related water quality impacts to a level of insignificance. If any construction activity falls within Caltrans Right of Way, an Encroachment Permit shall be required. The applicant must submit a copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prior to construction. If a SWPPP is not required for the project, the applicant shall prepare and submit a Water Pollution Management Program (WPMP) pursuant to Caltrans Standard Specifications and "Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbook, Construction Contractors Guide and Specifications." All activities within Caltrans Right of Way must fully conform to the Caltrans Statewide NPDES Permit No. CAS000003 (Order No. 99-06-DWQ). If any construction activity falls within Riverside County Flood Control District Right of Way, an Encroachment Permit shall be required. A) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. No long-term impacts on water quality are anticipated, although there may be some short-term impacts on water quality from runoff of water and dirt due to construction. However, the proposed project will be required to comply with the State NPDES Storm Water Permit Program and City requirements. Therefore, the implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to violate water quality standards provided the mitigation measures listed below are incorporated into the proposed project. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-37 B) Would theproject substantially deplete groundwatersupplies or interferesubstanti ally with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), which provides water to a 96-squaremile area in western Riverside County. The District derives its water sources from local groundwater and surface sources and supplements these sources with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The District obtains its main local groundwater source from the Pauba Formation Aquifer, located northwest and southeast of the Lake through eight active wells in the Elsinore Basin. Groundwater t storage in the basin is estimated at 1,155,000 acre feet of water. Natural inflow to the Elsinore Basin is estimated at 800 acre feet per year. According to the Groundwater Management Plan, the Elsinore Basin may be in a current state of overdraft, by 4,400, acre feet per year. To minimize overdraft, the EVMWD imports 52.1% of their water from the MWD, while only 39.6% is derived from the wells in Lake Elsinore and three additional wells in Corona, the Elsinore Basin and the Temescal Basin, respectively. The remainder of the water comes from the Canyon Lake Plant. Currently, the EVMWD is considering the development of a groundwater storage program to "bank" water during wet periods and extract this water during s droughts. In addition, the Lake has historically undergone periods of drying up, which reduces water quality and compromises fish and wildlife habitat. To maintain stable lake levels and minimize flooding during wet years, the Lake Elsinore Management Project was initiated by the EVMWD. c Current lake levels are approximately 1,235 feet in elevation with storm water runoff and the use of s recycled water. The proposed project would require 43,800 gallons of water per day, or approximately 49 acre feet of water per year, based upon a development of 146 dwelling units. Consequently, the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supply, as it comprises less than 0.01% of the total groundwater in the Elsinore Basin. Moreover, most of EVMWD water is imported. Additionally, the proposed project would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. The proposed project is located within the Elsinore Basin. Stormwater flows that currently flow within the Elsinore Basin, and to Lake Elsinore, do not represent a significant source of groundwater recharge (as stated in the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan). "Therefore, impacts to groundwater recharge from the implementation of the project are considered less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-38 C) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly alter drainage patterns. BMPs for erosion control will be implemented in accordance with Mitigation Measure 8.1 listed below. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. D) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff. The proposed project will include the construction of a storm drain improvements which will mitigate potential impacts to a level of insignificance. E) Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any significant long tern impacts. The proposed project will include the construction of storm drain improvements which will mitigate potential impacts to a level of insignificance. F) Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The project will be required to comply with the State NPDES Storm Water Permit Program and City requirements. As a result, potential impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. G) Would the project place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The South Riverside Flood Control Channel runs along the northwest and northeast borders of the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would not interfere with the flow of waters in the flood control channel. The project site is located within an area designated as "Flood Zone X: Area of Minimal Flooding" based on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 060636 2042 F. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-39 The proposed project does not include the construction of housing units within a 100 -year floodplain. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. H) Would the project place within a 100 -year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. As stated above, the project site does not include the construction of structures within a 100 -year floodplain. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. 1) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. Accordirigto the County of Riverside's General Plan, theproject sitedoes not liewithin an inundation area associated with nearby reservoirs (i.e. Prado Dam and Santiago Reservoir). As a result, people or structures would not be exposed to a significant risk of loss, injury or death due to failure of a levee or dam, and no impacts would occur. J) Would the project inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. A seiche is a surface wave created when a body of water is shaken, usually by earthquake activity. Seiches are potentially hazardous when the wave action created in lakes or swimming pools is strong enough to threaten life and property. According to the Public Safety and Urban Services Element of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, a seiche in Lake Elsinore could occur during an earthquake, causing the lake level to rise by ten inches to twenty feet. The lake shoreline, and areas around the Temescal Outflow channel, could be impacted severely. The proposed project area is located approximately 2,100 feet from the northwestern shore of the lake. While seiches may pose a threat and be considered potentially significant, effects would be mitigated to a less than significant level by compliance with the Lake Elsinore Lake Management Project. The Lake Management Project (LMP) completed in 1995, entailed the construction of an earthen levee, construction of controlled overflow points, addition of an overflow weir, and the guarantee that the lake is not operated at levels above an elevation of 1,249 feet. Tsunamis are large ocean waves generated by major seismic events. The project site is located approximately 20 miles inland from the coast. Based on the location of the proposed project site, no impacts from tsunamis are anticipated. Mudflows are landslide events in which a mass of saturated soil flows downhill as a very thick liquid. The proposed project site is located approximately 0.5 mile away from the base of the nearest slope. No impacts are anticipated from mudflows. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary for tsunamis or mudflows, and any anticipated impacts from seiches will be mitigated by the measures already in place. No mitigation measures are necessary. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-40 K) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post -construction activities? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project aims to construct 146 single-family attached housing units on the site. According to the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), pollutants generated from residential developments that can impact storm water include pathogens, nutrients, pesticides, sediments, trash and debris, oxygen -demanding substances, and oil and grease. Construction of the onsite catch basin and BMPs outlined in the WQMP, would reduce any impacts from post -construction activities to less than significant. No additional mitigation measures are required. L) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction or post construction? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The project's runoff flow rate, volume, velocity and duration for the post -development condition will not exceed the pre -development condition for 2 -year and 10 -year storm events due to implementation of the proposed BMPs. As a result, impacts are considered less than significant. M) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Residential uses associated with project buildout do not have the potential to create an impact in this regard. No hazardous material would be allowed to be stored onsite, and no loading docks, delivery areas, or material storage would occur at project buildout. During construction, impacts would be reduced by the implementation of the mitigation measures detailed in Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. No additional measures are necessary. N) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. According to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), Waste Discharge Requirements for the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, stormwater flows which are discharged to MS4s in the Permit area are tributary to various water bodies (inland surface streams, lakes and reservoirs) of the state. The beneficial uses of these water bodies include municipal and domestic supply; agricultural supply; industrial service and process supply; groundwater recharge; water contact recreation, non -contact recreation and sportfishing; warm and cold freshwater habitat, preservation of biological habitats of special significance; and wildlife habitat and preservation of rare, threatened or endangered species. To protect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters, the pollutants from all sources, including urban runoff, need to be controlled. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-41 Implementation of the proposed project would alter the existing hydrology on-site by discharging all runoff onsite into the South Riverside Flood Control Channel, which ultimately flows into Lake Elsinore. Runoff on-site would collect in the proposed storm drainage system and drain into the interior roads of the site, where it would collect into the proposed water quality basin, and from there, discharge into the flood control channel. Any impacts to the downstream receiving water body (Lake Elsinore) would be reduced to a level of less than significant through implementation of the site-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). No additional mitigation is required. O) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? Less Than Significant Impact. Although development of the project would result increased impervious surfaces, the project has incorporated a water quality control basin and bioswales to ensure that the project's runoff flow rate, volume, velocity and duration for the post -development condition do not exceed the pre -development condition for 10 -year rainfall events. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. P) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? A Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would not result in y increases in erosion or siltation on-site or in the surrounding areas. Any impacts to the Riverside County Flood Control Channel from construction of the proposed project would be reduced by implementation of the SWPPP while adherence to the WQMP would result in Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would adequately control erosion or siltation from long-term residential uses. Impacts are considered less than significant in this regard. MITIGATION MEASURES 8.1 During grading activities, the Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control shall be implemented and monitored as needed to prevent any significant sediment transport. These practices may include but may not be limited to the following: the use of materials such as sandbags, sediment fencing and erosion control matting to stabilize disturbed areas, and installation of erosion control materials. 8.2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit for approval to the State Water Resources Control Board, a Notice of Intent to be covered under the Storm Water Permit. Additionally, the project proponent shall prepare a SWPPP which will: 1) require implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) so as to prevent a net increase in sediment load in storm water discharges relative to preconstruction levels; 2) prohibit during the construction period discharges of storm water or non -storm water at levels which would cause or contribute to an exeeedance of applicable water quality standards contained in the Basin Plan; 3) discuss in detail the BMPs planned for the project related to control of Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-42 sediment and erosion, non -sediment pollutants, and potential pollutants in non -stone water discharges; 4) describe post -construction BMPs for the project; 5) explain the maintenance program for the project's BMPs; 6) during construction, require reporting of violations to the Regional Board; and 7) list the parties responsible for SWPPP implementation and BMP maintenance during and after grading. The project proponent shall implement the SWPPP and will modify the SWPPP as directed by the Storm Water Permit. 8.3 Prior to the issuance of preliminary or precise grading permits, the applicant shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with the State Water Resources Control Board. Such evidence shall consist of a copy of the NOI stamped by the State Water Resources Control Board or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or a letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed. 8.4 Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, the applicant shall submit, and the Director of Planning and Development shall have approved, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The WQMP shall identify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the site to control predictable pollutant runoff. 8.5 Prior to the release of a final map by the City, the applicant shall construct, or enter into an agreement and post security, in a form and amount acceptable to the City Engineer, guaranteeing the construction of storm drain facilities, including detention basins in conformance with applicable City standards. 8.6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a groundwater survey of the affected portion of the site. The analysis shall be prepared by a geotechnical engineer versed in groundwater analysis and shall include the following information and analysis: a. Potential for perched groundwater intrusion into the shallow groundwaterzone upon buildout. b. Analysis for relief of groundwater buildup and properties of soil materials onsite. C. Impact of groundwater potential on building and structural foundations. d. Proposed mitigation to avoid potential for groundwater intrusion within five feet of the bottom of the footings. Village at Lakeshore Expanded initial Study 5-43 S.9 Land Use and Planning ASSESSMENT The General Plan land use designation for the project area is "Specific Plan Area P," and may consist i of a wide range of land uses. The General Plan also identifies Riverside Drive frontage as an area appropriate for general and tourist commercial uses. In addition, this area may be appropriate for multiple -family housing at a density not exceeding 18 dwelling units per acre, if access off of Riverside Drive is feasible. The project lies within one of the City's designated Redevelopment Areas (RDA), Project Area 2, Area A. The City's zoning designation for the proposed project site is Commercial Park (C -P) The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been prepared for the proposed project will allow for the development of 146 single family attached dwelling units on approximately 20 acres with a density of approximately 7.4 dwelling units per acre. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. However, the re -zone application is necessary to change the Commercial Park (C -P) zoning to Medium Density Residential (R-2) zoning, in order to reflect the s changes in market demand. The "R-2" designation is intended to provide locations for quality residential projects, consisting of products other than single-family detached developments. The change in zone would allow for up to 12 dwelling units per acre which is less than the density recommended under the General Plan designation. Compatibility with the Surrounding Land Uses Existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site include residential land uses to the southeast, southwest, and northwest of the project site, and Lakeside High School located adjacent and northeast of the project site. The proposed project is similar in density to the surrounding land uses. There is a potential for land use conflicts associated with air quality, noise and traffic due to the increase in residential uses. Additionally, the project entrance will be located near the high school. The design of the project's entrance will promote a deceleration of vehicles onto and towards the school zone. As detailed throughout this document, air quality, noise and traffic impacts are not considered significant with the incorporation of mitigation measure included herein. Asa result, the proposed project is considered environmentally compatible with the surrounding land uses and no significant impacts are anticipated. A) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The proposed project would result in the development of 146 single family dwelling units on a site adjacent to existing residential, commercial and open spaces uses. No established communities are located on the project site and the development will not divide and established community. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-44 B) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, orzoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. However, a re -zone will be required to convert the zoning designation from Commercial Park (C -P) to Medium Density Residential (R-2). The re -zone will be consistent with the General Plan Designation which allows up to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project would result in approximately 7.4 dwelling units per acre. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. C) Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Consistency of the proposed project with the Western Riverside MSHCP is discussed previously in Section 5.4(F) of this document. Mitigation Measure 4.1 has been incorporated into the project to ensure payment of the MSHCP mitigation fees. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-45 S. 10 Mineral Resources ASSESSMENT The construction phase of the project will require the use of fuel for operation of construction equipment. Upon completion, the project will consume electricity and natural gas. However, development of 146 homes and associated infrastructure will not result in a significant impact to these resources. In addition, the project site is not designated as, nor is it located near, any known regionally or locally significant mineral resources as designated in the Open Space/Conservation Element of the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan. Given this, no loss of available known mineral resources are likely. As a result, no significant impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. A) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The project site is not designated as, nor is it located near, any known regionally significant mineral resources. Given this, no loss of available known mineral resources that would be of value with the implementation of the project are likely. B) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. No locally -important mineral resource recovery sites are located on or near the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. Village at LaKeSnere Expanded initial study 5-46 9 I S. f f Noise A noise study was prepared for the proposed project by Albert A. Webb Associates on May 3, 2006. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix G of this document. ASSESSMENT Construction Noise Impacts Construction activities, especially from heavy equipment, may create substantial short-term noise increases near the project site. Such impacts might be important for nearby noise sensitive receptors such as the existing surrounding residential uses and the high school currently under construction to the northeast of the project site. The most noise -intensive period will be during the grading of the site. Dozers and other heavy equipment will be used. Equipment noise will reach 90 dB at 50 feet from such equipment when it operates under a full load. Under normal atmospheric conditions, peak noise levels up to 65 dB may be heard as far as 1,000 feet from the operating equipment. A level of 65 dB is considered intrusive in normal conversation. Construction activity impacts during the noisiest activities could thus extend as far as approximately 1,000 feet from the activity. Irregular terrain would, however, often block direct line -of -sight noise propagation. Due to the terrain variability, temporary construction noise impacts will typically be less than their theoretical maximum. Impacts from construction are considered short-term impacts since noise will cease upon completion of construction activity. If grading were to occur during periods of heightened residential noise sensitivity, a temporary significant impact could occur. However, the City of Lake Elsinore noise ordinance only allows construction on Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Compliance with the City's noise ordinance is predicted to create a less than significant temporary noise impact during project construction. Area -Wide Noise Impacts Long-term noise concerns from the redevelopment of the project area center primarily on mobile source activities on streets surrounding the project site. The, average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for each road segment analyzed are based upon the latest traffic data collected and calculated in the traffic study prepared for this project. Future noise impacts resulting from vehicular traffic on roadways were modeled using the California Specific Vehicle Noise Curves (CALVENO) in the LegV2 computer program. LegV2 is a mainframe computer implementation of the 'FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHA W A -RD -77-108) and was developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Village at l.akeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-47 in the early 1980s. The program evaluates noise at one receptor from up to eight straight roadway Janes and is very useful in predicting noise impacts in simple scenarios. Site-specific information is entered, such as traffic volumes, distances, and speeds; and adjustments can be made for the use of noise barriers. The average speed for all streets is assumed to be 40 mph, which compensates for any start/stop effects at lower speeds. The site is treated as a "hard" site, allowing a 3 dB reduction for each doubling of the distance. The standard vehicle mix used to calculate the vehicular noise impacts as shown on Table 5-4. The project is estimated to generate 1,231 daily trips. By assuming that the peak hour traffic volume is 10% of the average daily traffic (ADT), the peak hour traffic volume for roadways in the project vicinity was calculated from the ADT for existing conditions and existing conditions plus project generated traffic (in order to determine the project related area -wide noise impacts). Analysis of area -wide noise impacts from project -related traffic was done by calculating the noise levels at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline of each road and was summarized on Table 5-5. Project generated traffic along roadways in the project vicinity will result in a maximum noise level increase of 0.7 dB, which is less than the 3 dB threshold. Therefore, area -wide noise impacts from project - generated traffic are considered less than significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-48 Table 5-5 Noise Levels,at 561eet from' Centerline of Roadways in Project Vicinity Road Segment Existing (dB CNEL) Existing + Project (dB CNEL) Increase from Existing (dB CNEL) Riverside Drive (SR-74) NE of W Lakeshore Dr 58.5 59.0 0.5 SW of W Lakeshore Dr 59.2 59.8 0.6 NE of Lincoln St 59.2 59.8 0.6 SW of Lincoln St 58.5 59.1 0.6 NE of Project Site 58.1 58.6 0.5 SW of Grand Ave 47.0 47.7 0.7 Machado Street NE of Grand Ave 49.4 49.8 0.4 SW of Grand Ave 36.6 36.6 0.0 Macy Street SW of Grand Ave 48.6 48.9 0.3 Grand Avenue NW of Machado St 52.4 52.9 0.5 SE of Machado St 54.4 55.1 0.7 SE of Project Site 54.8 55.5 0.7 cy St 58.5 59.0 0.5 St 58.3 58.8 0.5ore llriveerside Dr I 58.3 58.7 0.4rside Dr 5-7.8 58.3 0.5reeterside Dr 55.0 55.3 0.4 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-49 Exterior Noise Impacts and Compliance Since residential land uses are proposed in this project, exterior and interior noise impacts to these sensitive receivers have to be analyzed. The project involves the development of 146 low-rise condominiums. Although there are no backyards associated with the project, the City's exterior noise threshold applies to private patios and balconies. Therefore, an exterior noise analysis is necessary. Riverside Drive (S12-74) Based on project design, a 6 -foot high wall (wall height is relative to the pad elevation) is proposed around the project. With the inclusion of the 6 -foot wall, the exterior noise impacts to a first floor receiver will be 61.0 dB and 67.0 dB to a second floor receiver, which are both higher than the City's exterior noise threshold of 60 dB. In order to meet the City's exterior noise standard, additional mitigation is required along Riverside Drive. In order to comply with the City's existing exterior noise threshold of 60 dB, incorporation of a 7 -foot high sound wall (relative to pad elevation) will reduce the exterior noise impacts to a first floor receiver to 59.9 dB. However, this wall will be insufficient to reduce the exteriornoise impacts to a second floor receiver to a less than significant level. hr order to reduce the exterior noise impacts at the second floor balconies, a 6 -foot high sound barrier (relative to the elevation of the balcony floor) is required. This sound barrier must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot and must not have any openings or gaps. The barrier may be constructed using glass, plexiglass, stud and stucco construction, or a combination of these materials. Additionally, the floors of the balconies must be solid, without any openings. If as part of the General Plan update the City adopts a new 65 dB exterior noise threshold; no additional mitigation would be required for a first floor receiver since the exterior noise level, with the presence of the proposed 6 -foot high wall, would be 61.0 dB. Additionally, a second floor receiver would be exposed to a noise impact of 63.9 dB with the incorporation of 3 -foot high noise barrier (relative to the elevation of the balcony floor). Grand Avenue Based on project design, a 6 -foot high wall (wall height is relative to the pad elevation) is proposed around the project. With the inclusion of the 6 -foot wall, the exterior noise impacts to a first floor receiver will be 55.7 dB and 61.7 dB to a second floor receiver, which only exceeds the City's exterior noise threshold of 60 dB for the second floor receiver. In order to meet the City's exterior 33 noise standard, additional mitigation is required for all balconies along Grand Avenue. P In order to comply with the City's existing exterior noise threshold of 60 dB, no additional mitigation is required for a first floor receiver. In order to reduce the exterior noise impacts at the Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study second floor balconies, a 3 -foot high sound barrier (relative to the elevation of the balcony floor) is required. This sound barrier must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot and nnrst not have any openings or gaps. The barrier maybe constructed using glass, plexiglass, stud and stucco construction, or a combination of these materials. Additionally, the floors of the balconies must be solid, without any openings. If as part of the General Plan update the City adopts a new 65 dB exterior noise threshold; no additional mitigation would be required since the exterior noise level, with the presence of the proposed 6 -foot high wall, would be 55.7 dB for a first floor receiver and 61.7 dB for a second floor receiver. Interior Noise Impacts and Compliance The City's exposure criteria for new residential construction requires that the interior noise environment, attributable to outside sources, be limited to 45 dB CNEL. Each component of the building shell (e.g. exterior wall, windows, doors, etc.) provides a different amount of transmission loss for each "A" weighted octave band of community noise. Uniform Building Code (UBC) compliant residential buildings provide a minimum of 20 dBA in interior to exterior noise reduction. By meeting the 60 dB exterior threshold, interior noise impacts will be less than the City's 45 dB interior threshold for first floor receivers. Therefore, no further analysis of impacts to first floor receivers is necessary. Riverside Drive (SR -74) Based on a review of the conceptual floor plans, the second floor loft/optional bedroom of Plan 2, the second floor dining room of Plan 3, and the second floor master bedroom of Plan 4 require additional analysis to estimate the interior noise levels. The interior noise level was estimated using the Interior Noise Analysis (INA) computer program and the results are summarized in Table 5-6. Using the minimum building materials required by the UBC, the interior noise impacts are less than 45 dB with the windows closed. Since all condominium units will include heating and air conditioning, no additional mitigation measures are required for second floor receivers. at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study Table 5-G Interior Noise Impacts to Second Floor Receivers (dBA).,Riversid MinimumExterior Interior Noise Level STC Noise Open Window Closed Window Rating of Level Windows Plan 2 24 67 58 40 Plan 3 24 67 60 42 Plan 4 24 67 57 40 Grand Avenue Based on a review of the conceptual floor plans, the second floor loft/optional bedroom of Plan 2, the second floor dining room of Plan 3, and the second floor master bedroom of Plan 4 require additional analysis to estimate the interior noise levels. In order to assure a worst-case analysis, the figures in the following table do not take into account mitigation to reduce exterior noise levels below the City's significance threshold. The interior noise level was estimated using the Interior Noise Analysis (INA) computer program and the results are summarized below in Table 5-7. Use of the minimum building materials required by the UBC would reduce interior noise impacts to less than the City's 45 dB threshold with the windows closed. Because all units will include heat and air conditioning, no additional mitigation measures are required for second floor receptors. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial School Related Noise The Lakeside High School Athletic Field and Stadium (Stadium) is located north of the project area. The Stadium located at the High School has a seating capacity of 300 to 400 people and is being used for school activities as well as activities of other users who rent the Stadium throughout the year. In the Fall, it is anticipated that there are approximately 2 to 4 football games per week, with the high school's varsity games anticipated to draw near capacity crowds. Junior All American and Pop Warner Football rent the field for five Saturdays from 9 a.m. till 7 p.m. drawing approximately 300 to 400 people throughout the day. In Winter, there are approximately 2 to 4 soccer games per week for the high school and youth league. In Spring, there are approximately 5 track meets held which draw a crowd of 300 to 400 people. Throughout the year, the high school band practices outdoors once a week. The two dominant noise sources associated with the stadium are crowd noise and the public address (PA) system. The nearest spectator seating area to the project site is located approximately 500 feet away and is facing away from the project. The other spectator seating area facing the project site is approximately 700 feet away from the project. Sound from the PA system is usually directed towards the spectator seating area. The project site is not adjacent to the stadium or any of the spectator seating areas. Therefore, noise from the PA system is not expected to affect the residents of the project. Additionally, the major events at the stadium are occasional and will not occur beyond 10 pm. Furthermore, noise associated with regularly scheduled school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 am and 10:00 pm, and regularly scheduled activities conducted on public or private school grounds are exempt from the City's noise ordinance (Section 17.78.100(D) and (E)). Airport Noise Impacts The Skylark Airport is located approximately five miles southeast of the project site. Based on this distance, aircraft noise from this source will not result in "excessive" noise levels for the proposed residences. A) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in any applicable plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. In order to meet the City's interior and exterior noise standards for residences along Riverside Drive the project will require noise attenuation as required in Mitigation Measures 11.2 and 11.3, below. In addition, the proposed project includes the construction of heating and air conditioning in each residential unit. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-53 B) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? No Impact. Noise levels generated by the proposed project derive almost exclusively from temporary construction activities. As stated above, the nearest residents are located over 1,200 feet away from the proposed project. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. C) Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. Regional traffic patterns will not be modified sufficiently to create l any substantial off-site noise impacts. The threshold for human noise discrimination under strict laboratory conditions is 3 dB. Post -project traffic noise will not be perceptibly different away from the immediate project vicinity. Project generated traffic along roadways in the project vicinity will result in a maximum noise level increase of 0.7 dB. Noise levels generated from construction r activities are episodic in nature and would not contribute a permanent increase in ambient noise y levels in the project vicinity. As a result, the slight increase in ambient noise levels on the project vicinity are considered less than significant. D) Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient x noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? r Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Construction activities will generate additional noise during construction. The nearest sensitive receptors are the residents located approximately 50 feet away from the project site to the northwest. Mobile homes are located approximately 120 feet to the southeast and existing residents are located 120 feet to the southwest. As discussed above, equipment noise will reach a peak of 90 dB at 50 feet from equipment, such as dozers and other heavy equipment, when it operates under a full load. The City of Lake Elsinore allows for the generation of construction noise so long as it complies with Noise Ordinance Section 17.78.080 F under "Prohibited Acts," which prohibits noise sources associated with the operation of any tools and equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and at any time on Sundays or any legal holidays. Compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore's noise control ordinance would result in noise impacts which are considered to be less than significant. 1;) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The proposed project is outside of any Airport Land Use Plan boundaries. Noise level associated with the proposed project would not exceed acceptable levels and are not considered significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial F) For a project located within a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Skylark Airport is located approximately five miles southeast of the project site. The Skylark Airport is a private airstrip which mainly provides service for Skydive Elsinore. Aircraft departures for the dirt airstrip are minimal, and would not have the potential to expose residents to excessive noise levels. No mitigation measures are necessary. MITIGATION MEASURES 11.1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall incorporate the requirements of the Noise Ordinance as a note on the grading plan cover sheet, for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. The construction activities of the proposed project shall comply with the City ofLake Elsinore noise ordinance thatlimits construction activities to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 5 p. in. 11.2 Prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development with the City's most current exterior noise standard, through incorporation of the following mitigation measures, as appropriate: Usingthe he City's existing 60 dB LDN Exterior Noise Threshold For a first floor receiver adjacent to Riverside Drive, a 7 -foot high sound wall (relative to pad elevation) shall be constructed along the portion of Riverside Drive directly adjacent to the project. For a second floor receiver adjacent to Riverside Drive, a 6 -foot high sound barrier (relative to balcony elevation) shall be constructed for any balconies facing Riverside drive. The balcony floor must be solid, with no gaps or openings. The sound barrier may be constructed with glass, plexiglass, stud and stucco construction, or a combination of these materials, with a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot and must not have any openings or gaps. For a second floor receiver adjacent to Grand Avenue, a 3 -foot high sound barrier (relative to balcony elevation) shall be constructed for any balconies facing Riverside drive. The balcony floor must be solid, with no gaps or openings. The sound barrier may be constructed with glass, plexiglass, stud and stucco construction, or a combination of these materials, with a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot and must not have any openings or gaps. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-55 1 1.3 Prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits for each structure or tenant improvement other than a parking structure, the applicant shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The report shall show that the development will be sound -attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter and railroad, to meet City interior and exterior -noise standards and the Lmax standard for residential interior sound attenuation. The final acoustical report shall include all information required by the City's "Acoustical Report Information Sheet" (forni 42-48). In order to demonstrate that all mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project, the report shall be accompanied by a list identifying the sheet(s) of the building plans which include the approved mitigation measures. 11.4 Prior to issuance of each grading pennit, the applicant shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to ensure that the greatest distance between noise sources and sensitive receptors during construction activities has been achieved. This language shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. a. Construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be maintained in proper operating condition with approved noise mufflers. b. Construction staging areas shall be located away from off-site receptors and occupied buildings on site during the later phases of project development. C. Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from residential areas to the greatest extent feasible. d. Construction access routes shall be selected to minimize truck traffic near existing residential uses where reasonably feasible. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-56 S. 12 Population and Housing ASSESSMF,A'T Population impacts are often associated with substantial increases in population from a project. Housing impacts may result directly from the construction of new housing units or indirectly from changes in housing demand associated with new non-residential development, such as office, manufacturing, and industrial uses that increase employment in an area. The project consists of 146 medium -density single family homes which will result in an increase to the supply of housing and associated population in the area. According to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the City of Lake Elsinore will have a population of 36,804 within approximately 10,681 households in 2005. The average household size in the area is approximately 3.44 persons per unit. Lake Elsinore is projected to have a population of 42,940 in 2010 within approximately 12,703 households. Based on the size of the residential units proposed, the average household size for the proposed project is expected to be closer to 2.8 persons per unit for a total of 408 persons associated with the proposed project. As a result, project implementation will increase the housing and population of the Cityof Lake Elsinore by approximately 1 percent and the proposed development is within the projections estimated by the SCAG for 2010. Therefore, impacts related to population and housing are not considered significant. A) Would the project induce substantial population growth in the area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the proposed project is consistent with current growth data adopted by SLAG. As a result, a less than significant impact is anticipated. B) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project will not displace any housing. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. C) Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. No housing will be destroyed nor will people be displaced as a result of project implementation. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASUX ES No mitigation measures are necessary. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-57 S. 13 Public Services ASSESSMENT The proposed project consists of the development of 146 medium -density residential units which will result in an increase in demand for public services. A) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: I) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The primary fire protection services to the project site are provided by the Riverside County Fire Department, in cooperation with the California Department of Forest and Fire Protection. Due to the high fire hazards adjacent to the City, the Safety Element in the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan sets forth a service ratio of one full-time firefighter per 1,000 persons. and a response time of five minutes for urban areas and six minutes for rural areas. The Riverside County Fire Protection Master Plan would require the need for an "Urban - Category II" level of service based on the proposed use of the project site. This service criteria requires a fire station within three miles of all areas of the project by roadway distance and a full first alarm assignment operating on the scene of a fire within 15 minutes of dispatch. All medical emergencies shall have treatment initiated within ten minutes of report of alarm. Current staffing provides for a minimum of one Firefighter/Operator and two Firefighters for a responding unit. The current response staffing for the proposed project area for an initial structural fire response will include eight personnel 9 minimum for a single family residential and a total of ten personnel minimum for multi -family, commercial and industrial. A wildland fire response includes a total of 48 personnel minimum during periods of high fire danger. j The proposed project site would be served by the Riverside County Fire Department, Fire Station #85, located at 29405 Grand Avenue, approximately 2.5 miles north of the project site.' The McVicker Station, recently opened in 2002, can provide the proposed project with one medical engine. Other nearby fire stations that would be able to provide back-up service for the project would include: Fire Station #10, Elsinore, located approximately four miles east of the project site and Fire Station #11, Lakeland Village, located approximately three miles southeast of the project site. The Elsinore Station can provide one City medical engine and two State engines to the project Correspondence with Jorge Rodriguez, Fire Captain Specialist, Riverside Counly Fire Department, letter dated April 20, 2006 Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-58 site. Adequate service can be provided by the Riverside County Fire Department for the proposed project from these facilities. All emergency calls are dispatched from the same 911 Fire Center. This project would not create the need for additional firefighters, nor new facilities. No mitigation measures are necessary. ii) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site would be served by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department/Lake Elsinore Police Department, located at 333 West Limited Avenue, approximately four miles southeast of the project site. There are currently 82 sworn officers and 17.5 non -sworn personnel at this station. Police staffing requirements for Lake Elsinore are one sworn officer per 1,000 persons, one supervisor and one support staff per seven officers, one patrol vehicle per three sworn officers, and five school resource officers assigned to the local middle and high schools. Although there is no average response time due to the differing nature/priority of each call received by the 911 dispatcher, every effort is made by sworn personnel at the Lake Elsinore Station to respond to "Priority 1" calls within 6 minutes or less. According to the Lake Elsinore Sheriffs Station, there is no need for additional sworn officers to serve this project, nor will there be a need for new facilities and/or new equipment..' No mitigation measures are necessary. iii) School services? Less Than Significant Impact. The Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) would provide educational needs to student populations generated from the proposed project. According to the LEUSD Facilities Service Department, project students would attend Withrow Elementary School (Grades K-5), Terra Cotta Middle School (Grades 6-8) and Lakeside High School (Grades 9-12 in 2005).' Based on LEUSD student generation rates per dwelling unit of 0.4165, 0.1810 and 0.1588 for elementary, middle and high schools respectively, the proposed project would generate 61 elementary school students, 26 middle school students, and 23 high school students. Pursuant to SB 50 (1998), LEUSD imposes Level I Statutory Developer Fees for new residential development. Payment of the developer fee ($3.03 per square foot of residential space) would mitigate school impacts to less than significant, and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. iv) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact. Because the proposed project would involve the development of residential uses, the project would result in additional park facility users. As a standard condition Correspondence with Elizabeth DeCou, Ci ane Prevention Office, Lake Elsinore Sheriffs Station, letter dated March 28, 2006. Correspondence with Karen Koski, Facilities Services, at Lake Elsinore Unified School District le¢e- dated April 18, 2006. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-59 of approval, the City of Lake Elsinore requires all new developments to abide by the Quimby Act (AB 1150), which enables local agencies to require the dedication of local park acreage, the payment of fees, or a combination thereof as part of the subdivision process. The park acreage standard for the City of Lake Elsinore is five acres per 1,000 persons. Accordingly, the proposed project would require approximately two acres of parkland. The project includes the development of a recreation area and two open space turf acres totaling approximately one acre. Therefore, the project applicant would be required to pay "in lieu" park fees to the City as a condition of project approval to meet the remainder of the parkland requirement, and impacts would be less than significant. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. V) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed residential development would have a need for public facilities such as libraries, postal service, hospitals, etc. Since the surrounding project area is already developed, these facilities already exist and would be able to provide the necessary services to the new residents. hnplementation of 146 residential units would have a less than significant impact on existing public facilities. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. S. 14 Recreation ASSESSMENT Implementation of the proposed project will result in the construction of 146 medium -density residential units resulting in an increase of population by approximately 408 persons. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan requires 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 population. (City Resolution No. 89-44, August 29, 1989.) As a result, the project will require approximately 2 acres of parkland for the proposed project. The proposed project will provide several improved parkland areas on site for future residents. A recreational area located central to the project site will include a swimming pool, spa, sitting area, enhanced paving surface and a secured gate that is accessible and commonly shared by all residents. The project will provide open turf areas for passive recreation purposes. In addition, the proposed water quality control basin will serve as an open turf area during dry periods. A) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed residential development includes the development of a recreational area and open turf areas for passive recreation. Project occupants would also be Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial able to utilize existing neighborhood and regional parks and recreational facilities. The closest park and recreation areas to the project site are the Lake Elsinore Recreation Area, Machado Park, and McVicker Park, all within one to two miles of the project site. The Cleveland National Forest is located immediately west of the project site and can be accessed by continuing west along Riverside Drive (SR 74). Additionally, pursuant to the Civic Center Act, project occupants would also be able to utilize the recreational facilities located at the adjacent Lakeside High School when school is not in session. Usage of any these facilities would be minimal, as the proposed project would result in a total of 408 residents, of which not all would simultaneously utilize the recreational facilities. Furthermore, the project applicant would be required to pay "in lieu" park fees, which would adequately address the minimal increase in City parkland uses, including maintenance of the facilities. Therefore, no significant impacts to parks or recreational facilities would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary. B) Does the projectinclude recreational facilities or require tie construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Th an Sign ificantfinpact. As discussed, project residents would be able to utilize existing and proposed parkland and recreational facilities, and the project applicant would be required to pay "in lieu" park fees. Existing recreational facilities within the project area would therefore meet the recreational needs of project residents. hnpacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant, and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. MITIGATION MEASURES Payment of "in lieu" park fees will be required as a standard conditional of approval on the project. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-61 H. 1-5 Transportation/Traffic A traffic study was prepared for the proposed project by Albert A. Webb Associates on October 12, 2006. The study is summarized in the following section and included in its entirety in Appendix H of this document. ASSESSMENT Study Area The study area includes the following intersections: Machado Street/Grand Avenue • Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74) Macy Street/Grand Avenue Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Riverside Drive/West Lakeshore Drive Riverside Drive/School Entrance (Cumulative + Project Only) Riverside Drive/Stadium Way (Cumulative + Project Only) State Route 74 (SR -74) traverses Lake Elsinore from north to south via Collier Avenue, Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, and Ortega Highway and extends from Lake Elsinore to Interstate 5 via Ortega Highway. Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic traveling to and from the proposed project. The i traffic generation figures determined for the project are based upon the development of 146 condominium dwelling units as currently proposed. Trip generation rates are based upon a publication entitled "Trip Generation" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), seventh edition. Table 5-8 provides the peak hour trip generation rates for the proposed project. The peak hour rates are based on the average peak hour generation rate multiplied by the directional distribution provided in ffE's trip generation publication. Land Use category231 does not have daily trip generation rates, therefore a similar land use category 230 was used to interpolate the daily trip generation rate based on total PM peak hour trip generation rates. After interpolation, this publication indicates that for condominium dwelling units, 8.67 trips per day per dwelling unit is the average trip generation rate. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-62 Table 5-9 provides the daily and peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. As shown on Table 5-9, Parcel Map 33267 is projected to generate approximately 1,274 daily trips, including 98 trips during the AM peak hour and 115 trips during the PM peak hour. Project Impacts Tables 5-10 and 5-11 shows the projected LOS under existing plus ambient growth plus project conditions, with and without improvements. Tablcs 5-12 and 5-13 provides the projected LOS at the study intersections under cumulative conditions plus ambient growth with the proposed project with and without offsite improvements. t i Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-63 Table 5=8 'rip "Generation Rates Land Use Peak AM Peak PM Daily Total In Out Total In Out 1'M 33267 0.67 0.17 0.50 0.78 0.45 0.33 8.G7 Low -Rise Condo Land use Category: 231 * Tnp Generation by the lavituie of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Seventh Edition, 2003. ** Derived rate based on Land Use 230 Table 5-9 provides the daily and peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. As shown on Table 5-9, Parcel Map 33267 is projected to generate approximately 1,274 daily trips, including 98 trips during the AM peak hour and 115 trips during the PM peak hour. Project Impacts Tables 5-10 and 5-11 shows the projected LOS under existing plus ambient growth plus project conditions, with and without improvements. Tablcs 5-12 and 5-13 provides the projected LOS at the study intersections under cumulative conditions plus ambient growth with the proposed project with and without offsite improvements. t i Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-63 Tab1c 510 Level of Service - Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Status AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sees.) LOS Delay (Secs.) LOS 1. Machado Street/Grand Avenue AWSC 10.7 B 10.4 B 2. Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue TWSC 14.0 B 13.2 B 3. Grand Avcnue/Riverside Drive (SR -74) TWSC OFL P OFL F 4. Macy Street/Crand Avenue TW SC 18.6 C 42.2 L 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signal 47.9 D 42.4 D 6. Riverside Drive/W Lakeshore Drive Signal 36.4 D 41.6 D OFL - Overflow Conditions, Delay > 200 sees, TWSC- Two Wa Stop Controlled, dWSC- 111 -Way Stop Controlled �Table,5-ill ' Level of Service`- Existing Plus Arrbient,Growth Plus Project With •Improvements'. . Intersection Traffic Status AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sees.) LOS Delay (Secs.) LOS 1. Machado Street/Grand Avenue AWSC 10.7 B 10.4 B 2. Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue TWSC 14.0 B 13.2 B 3. Grand Avenuc/Riverside Drive (SR -74) Signal 24.9 C 24.0 C 4, Macy StreevGrand Avenue Signal 4.8 A 5.1 A 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signal 47.9 D 42.4 D 6. Riverside Drive/W Lakeshore Drive El Signal 36.4 ll 41.6 D TWSC - Two Way Stop Controlled, d WSC -dII-Way St2E Connrolled Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study Table 5-12 Level of Service- Cumulative Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Status AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sees.) LOS Delay (Secs.) LOS 1. Machado StreeUGrand Avenue AWSC 14.3 B 28.1 D 2. Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue TWSC 21.8 C 25.3 D 3. Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74) TWSC OFL F OFL F 4. Macy StreeUGrand Avenue TWSC 47.3 E OFL F 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signal 127.3 F OFL F 6. Riverside Drive/W Lakeshore Drive Signal 57.3 E 143.2 F 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signal 8.4 A 5.7 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signal 8.1 A 8.0 A OFL- Overflow Conditions, Delay >200 sees,TWSC- Two Way Slop Controlled, AWSC- All-IflaySlop Controlled Table 5-13 Level of Service --Cumulative Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project,Withlmprovemgnts,., Intersection Traffic Status AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sees.) LOS Delay (Sees.) LOS 1. Machado Street/Grand Avenue AWSC 14.3 B 28.1 D 2. Riverside Drive/Grand Avenue TWSC 21.8 C 25.3 D 3. Grand Avenue/Riveiside Drive (SR -74) Signal 32.2 C 46.5 D 4, Macy StreeUGrand Avenue Signal 6.0 A 27.0 C 5, Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signal 32.2 C 28.1 C 6. Riverside Drive/W Lakeshore Drive Signal 29.0 C 44.4 D 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signal 8.4 A 5.7 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signal 8.1 A 8.0 A TW.SC - Two Wav slop Cowtolled, A TfISC-All-War Stop Controlled Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-65 With the following improvements, the study area intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better: Construction of full width of internal roadways and part width of the following roadways shall comply with the City of Lake Elsinore Standards: Construct partial wide improvements on the easterly/northerly side of Grand Avenue at its ultimate cross-section as an arterial highway (120 foot right-of-way) from the westerly boundary of the project to the intersection of Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74). • Construct partial width improvements on the westerly/northerly side of Riverside Drive (SR - 74) at its ultimate cross-section as a modified urban arterial highway (123 foot right-of-way) from the northerly boundary of the project to the intersection of Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74). Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Intersection Improvements,- Install mprovements: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (SR -74) to include the following geometries: Northbound: one left -turn lane and one through lane — Southbound: one shared through lane and right -turn lane — Eastbound: one shared left -turn and right -turn lane Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Macy Street and Grand Avenue to include the following geometries: — Northbound: One left -turn lane. One through lane and shared right -turn lane. — Southbound: One shared left -tum and through lane. One shared right -turn lane. — Eastbound: One shared left -turn lane and through lane. One right -turn lane. — Westbound: One shared left -turn lane and through lane. One shared right -tum lane. Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project Intersection Improvements.- Install mprovements. Install traffic signal at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (SR -74) to include the following geometries: Northbound: one left -turn lane and one through lane — Southbound: one through lane and one right -turn lane — Eastbound: two left -turn lanes and one right -turn lane Construct improvements on the intersection of Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street by. implementing an additional northbound and southbound through lane, restriping the southbound shared right -tum lane to a right -turn lane only, and restriping the eastbound shared left -turn lane to a left -turn lane only. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-66 e Construct improvements on the intersection of Riverside Drive and West Lakeshore Drive by implementing an additional southbound through lane and restriping the southbound shared right turn lane to a right -tum lane only, and implementing an additional eastbound and westbound left -tum lane. A) Would the project cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,274 daily trips, including 98 trips during the AM peak hour and 115 trips during the PM peak hour. According to Albert A. Webb Associates' traffic analysis, all movements in the study area will operate at an LOS of "D" or better with the incorporation of the street improvements mentioned above. With the mitigation measures implemented, the study area intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS. B) Would the project exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,274 daily trips, including 98 trips during the AM peak hour and 115 trips during the PM peak hour. According to Albert A. Webb Associates' traffic analysis, all movements in the study area will operate at an LOS of "D" or better with the incorporation of the street improvements mentioned above. With the mitigation measures implemented, the study area intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS. C) Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either all increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? NoInnpact. The proposed project consists of the development of 146 lots on approximately 20 acres which would have no effect on air traffic patterns. No significant impacts are expected. D) Would the project substantially increase hazards.due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will be required to meet the City of Lake Elsinore's sight distance standards at the project enhance. As a result, impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study I E) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The project site would be accessible to fire, ambulance, and police vehicles from Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue. No significant impacts are anticipated. F) Would the project result in insufficient parking capacity? Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the development of 146 single family homes and will accommodate 106 parking spaces for visitors along the internal street system and adjacent to the recreation area. As a result, parking impacts are considered less than significant. G) Conflict with applicable policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact. The Riverside Transit Authority serves Lake Elsinore with the following bus routes and commuter links: • Route 8: Lake Elsinore • Route 22: Downtown Terminal to Lake Elsinore Outlet Center ^' • Route 40: Lake Elsinore to Menifee • Route 206: Temecula - Murrieta - Lake Elsinore - Corona Metrolink t The proposed project is not anticipated to conflict with any alternative transportation goals or policies. MITIGATION MEASURES 15.1 Prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy for the first construction phase, the project applicant shall be required to construct the following improvements in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Standards: • Full width of all internal roadways; Partial width improvements on the easterly/northerly side of Grand Avenue at its ultimate cross-section as an arterial highway (120 -foot right-of-way) from the westerly boundary of the project to the intersection of Grand Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74); j Partial width improvements on the westerly/northerly side of Riverside Drive (SR- j 74) at its ultimate cross-section as a modified urban arterial highway (123 -foot right- of-way) from the northerly boundary of the project to the intersection of Grand @ Avenue/Riverside Drive (SR -74); C On-site traffic signing and striping; ' • Stop signs at the project exits on Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive; and A deceleration/acceleration lane at project driveway on Riverside Drive (SR -74). Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-68 15.2 In conjunction with final grading, landscape and street improvement plans, the sight distance at the project entrance roadway shall be reviewed with respect to Caltrans and City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards by the City Traffic Engineer. 15.3 Prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy for the first construction phase, the project applicant shall be required to install traffic signals at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (SR -74) to include the following geometrics: • Northbound: One left -tum lane. One through lane. • Southbound: One through lane. One right -cum lane. • Eastbound: Two left -tum lanes. One right -turn lane. 15.4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate on a fair -share basis for the improvement of three off-site intersections and shall pay all applicable traffic impact mitigation fees to the City of Lake Elsinore at the prevailing rate. The fair -share contribution will be based on improvement costs for the following traffic improvements: • Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Macy Street and Grand Avenue to include the following geometries: - Northbound: One left -turn lane. One through lane and shared right -tum lane. - Southbound: One shared left -turn and through lane. One shared right -turn lane. - Eastbound: One shared left -turn lane and through lane. One right -turn lane. - Westbound: One shared left -tum lane and through lane. One shared right - turn lane. Construction of improvements to the intersection of Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street by implementing an additional northbound and southbound through lane, restriping the southbound shared right -turn lane to a right -turn lane only, and restriping the eastbound shared left -turn lane to a left -turn lane only. • Construction of improvements to the intersection of Riverside Drive and West Lakeshore Drive by implementing an additional southbound through lane and restriping the southbound shared right turn lane to a right -tum lane only, and implementing an additional eastbound and westbound left -turn lane. M Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-69 H. 16 Utilities and Service Systems ASSESSMENT Project implementation will require the extension of water, electricity, and telephone lines to serve the proposed project. However, existing facilities for all utilities are readily available at Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive which border the site to the southwest and southeast respectively. All utilities will be constructed underground. A) Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in the development of 146 single family residential units. The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provides wastewater treatment for the City of Lake Elsinore. EVMWD will provide wastewater service from the project area from a 10 inch sewer line in Grand Avenue. According to the Public Safety and Urban Services Element of the Lake Elsinore General Plan, Medium High Density Residential uses produce 250 gallons per dwelling unit per day of wastewater effluent. As a result, the proposed project would result in the addition of 36,500 gallons per day of effluent flow to the Lake Elsinore Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility. The current capacity of EVMWD's treatment plant is 8.5 million gallons per day. The effluent flow from the proposed project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the EVMWD." No mitigation measures are necessary. B) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. As indicated above, existing sewer lines are readily available from their current location at Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. Domestic water service will also be provided by EVMWD from existing waterlines available adjacent to the project site, including a 14 inch waterline in Grand Avenue and a 10 inch waterline in Riverside Drive. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. Correspondence with Cher Quinones, Development at Records Coordinator, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, letter dated June 23, 2006. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-70 C) Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project includes construction of a stomr water drainage system for the proposed project as indicated in Mitigation Measure 16.1. Storm water runoff within the project area will be collected through a system of on-site drain pipes, and into an onsite water quality basin with diversion beam and bio Swale. Flows will then be discharged into the existing South Riverside Channel Stage 1, adjacent to Riverside Drive. A SWPPP must be prepared using State Guidelines and maintained on-site at all times. BMPs must be utilized during the grading and paving of the site as well as during project operation to minimize the discharge of sediments and non-visible pollutants from the project site. No significant impacts to storm water drainage facilities resulting from the proposed project would occur. No additional mitigation measures beyond those discussed in Hydrology and Water Quality section of this document would be required. D) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, there will be sufficient water supplies to provide adequate water to the site.' The project site would be connected to the municipal water system, which receives water from several sources, including wells, local surface water within the Elsinore Groundwater Basin, groundwater from the Pauba Formation Aquifer, and supplemental water from the Metropolitan Water District. Total storage capacity within the Elsinore Groundwater Basin was estimated to be 1.4 million acre feet, according to the EVWMD in 2001. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Medium High Density Residential Development has a daily water consumption factor of 300 gallons per dwel ling unit. Based on this consumption factor, the proposed development is projected to create a demand for a total of 43,800 gallons per day. Development of the proposed project would increase water demand within the Elsinore Valley by approximately 15.9 mgy or by less than 1.2% of the total groundwater capacity of the Elsinore Basin. The demand on the existing storage and pump systems would increase with buildout of the site; however, the proposed project would not require expansion of any water supplies and therefore, neither new nor expanded entitlements would be needed to support this project. No mitigation measures are necessary. Correspondence frith Cher Quinones, Development at Records Coordinator, Elsinore Valley Municipal lfraler District, letter dated June 23, 2006. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5- E) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact, The proposed project site would be connected to the municipal sewer and wastewater system treated at the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility. The Facility will have the capacity to treat 8 million gallons of effluent per day. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Medium High Density Residential has a wastewater generation factor of 250 gallons per dwelling unit per day. Therefore, the proposed 146 unit development would result in approximately 36,500 gallons per dayof wastewater effluent, which would not represent a significant proportion of existing flow to the Regional Reclamation Facility such that it would impact the overall wastewater treatment capacity. According to the EVMWD, the proposed project would not require expansion of any wastewater treatment facilities, and therefore, would have no impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity.' No mitigation measures are necessary. F) Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) p oversees waste disposal for the City of Lake Elsinore. According to the CIWMB, the following landfills were utilized by the City of Lake Elsinore in 2000: Arvin Sanitary Landfill in Kern County, l Badlands Disposal Site in Riverside County, El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill in Riverside County, Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill in Orange County, and the Lamb Canyon Disposal Site in Riverside County. The Badlands Disposal site, the Lamb Canyon Disposal Site and the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill are managed by the Riverside County Waste Management Department. The El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill, located in Corona, is able to accept 10,000 tons of waste per day (TPD) with a remaining capacity of approximately 3 million cubic yards, and would likely be the waste facility receiving waste generated from the proposed project. The El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill is scheduled to close in 2030. The Badlands Disposal Site, located in Moreno Valley, is able to accept 4,000 TPD with a remaining capacity of approximately 15 million cubic yards. The Badlands Disposal Site is scheduled to close in 2018. The Lamb Canyon Site, located in Beaumont, is able to accept 3,000 TPD with a remaining capacity of approximately 26 million cubic yards. The Lamb Canyon Disposal Site is scheduled to close in 2023. Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, located in Irvine, is currently authorized to receive an annual average of 7,015 (TPD) and is permitted to receive a daily maximum of no more than 8,500 TPD. Frank R. Bowerman is scheduled to close in approximately 2024. The Arvin Sanitary Landfill is able to accept 800 TPD with a remaining capacity of Cmrespondetce with Cher Quinones, Development at Recants Coordinator, Elvinore Valley Municipal Water District, letter dated June 23, 2006. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-72 approximately 2 million cubic yards. The Avrin Sanitary Landfill is scheduled to close in December 2008. The proposed project would not generate significant amounts of solid waste. According to the CIWMB, the total household waste disposal for the City of Lake Elsinore in 2000 was 6,307 tons per year, or approximately 1 pound per resident per day. Implementation of the proposed project would not affect the overall generation of solid waste as 146 residential units would only generate approximately 74 tons per year of solid waste, less than 1.2% of the total waste stream for Lake Elsinore. Furthermore, the City of Lake Elsinore would continue to divert 48% of its solid waste, as specified in the 2002 CIWMB review of diversion rates. Additional landfill space would not be necessitated from implementation of this project alone. No significant impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. G) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Public Safety and Urban Services Element of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, in 1972, the State Legislature adopted the California Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act, which required each county within the state to prepare a solid waste management plan for all waste generated in the county and disposed of inside or outside of the county. In compliance with the Act, the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Plan was prepared in 1988, and serves as the general guideline for waste management in the county. The proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste and source reduction. No solid waste impacts would result from the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. MITIGATION MEASURES 16.1 Prior to final map recordation, the applicant shall prepare storm drain improvement plans which incorporate the appropriate stortr drain pipe sizing. S. f 7 Mandatory Findings of Significance Implementation of the proposed project will not create any significant impacts related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, land. use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, or traffic. No significant geologic constraints were identified, although the site will be subject to seismic groundshaking typical of all areas of southern California. The proposed project will, however, slightly increase urban runoff and the need for utilities/service systems. Short-term air quality impacts will be associated with grading and construction activities. The project also involves potential impacts to biology and cultural resources. However, feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project which will avoid or substantially lessen potentially significant impacts to a less -than -significant level at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-73 for the reasons set forth in this Expanded Initial Study. Based on the information and environmental analysis of potential environmental impacts contained in this Expanded Initial Study prepared for the project (as described below), it has been determined that a Negative Declaration be prepared for this project and that the Negative Declaration contain all of the mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study. A) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project involves the construction of 146 residential units on a 20 acre parcel in the City of Lake Elsinore. The proposed project would be developed on a site that was previously used for agricultural uses and is currently surrounded with existing residential uses. There are no wildlife habitats, endangered plants or animals, or important examples of California pre -history or history in the vicinity. However, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project to ensure compliancewith the b Western Riverside MSHCP and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (see Section 5.4 and Mitigation Measures 4.1 and 4.2). B) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a projectare considerable when viewed in connection with the effects ofpastprojects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of the probable future projects. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the review of impacts in this Initial Study, the proposed project could result in significant project -related Aesthetic impacts, Cultural, Geological, Hazards, Hydrology and Water Quality impacts, Noise, and Traffic impacts. However, incorporation of the mitigation measures and project design features included in this Initial Study would reduce all of the proposed project's potential impacts to a level that would be considered less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts. C) Does theproject haveenvironmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. A potentially active earthquake fault traverses the project site (see Section 5.6 of this document). Impacts related to rupture of the fault zone are mitigated to a level of less than significant by the incorporation of a 50 foot structural setback from the fault location and compliance with the latest Uniform Building Code. All other Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-74 environmental impacts evaluated in this Initial Study, would not result in a substantial adverse impact on human beings, either directly or indirectly. With the incorporation of mitigation measures and project design features described herein environmental impacts to human beings will beless than significant. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 5-75 0 Organizations and Persons Consulted 6.f Preparers Templeton Planning Group (Consultant to the City) 1470 Jamboree Road, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Peter Templeton, Principal • Nicole Morse, Director of Environmental Services • Vanessa Ko, Project Manager • Olivia Young, Project Planner • Ken Shevlin, Project Planner 6.2 persons and Organizations Consu/ted City of Lake Elsinore (Lead Agency) Planninp Department • Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development • Matthew C. Harris, Senior Planner • Wendy Worthey, Principal Environmental Planner Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Cher Quinones, Development and Records Coordinator Riverside County Sheriff/Lake Elsinore Sheriffs Station • Elizabeth DeCou, Crime Prevention Officer Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 6-1 Lake Elsinore Unified School District • Karen Koski, Facilities Secretary Riverside County Fire Department • Jorge Rodriguez, Fire Captain Specialist 6.3 Project Appiicsnt Classic Pacific • R. Gordon Craig, President, Homebuilding Division • Doug Steiner, Vice President, Development Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 6_2 �7 List of References 1. Albert A. Webb Associates, Acoustical Impact Analysis for Tentative Tract Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, May 3, 2006. 2. Albert A. Webb Associates, Air Quality Impact Analysis for Tentative Tract Number 33267 at The Village at Lakeshore, September 2005. 3. Albert A. Webb Associates, Drainage Studies for Tentative Tract No. 33267, September 2005. 4. Albert A. Webb Associates, Revised Traffic Impact Study Report: The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan, Parcel Map 33267. City of Lake Elsinore, October 2005. 5. Albert A. Webb Associates, Water Quality Management Plan for Tentative Parcel Man Number 33267 at Lake Elsinore, California, October 2005. 6. California Integrated Waste Management Board, 2000. 7. City of Lake Elsinore, General Plan, Adopted 1990. (Revised 1995) 8. CRM TECH, Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey ReportfortheLaVentanaProiect at Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, October 2004. 9. Michael Brandman Associates, Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis for the Tomlinson Property, APNs 379-050-034 and -006, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, June 2, 2006, 10. Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., Geotechnical Investigation 336 Unit Residential Development Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore California, July 28, 2004. 11. Southern California Geotechnical, hic., Fault Stu dfor 336 Unit Residential Development, Tomlinson Propertyat Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore California, August 2004. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 12. Southern Califomia Geotechnical, Inc., Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 336 Unit Residential Development for Tomlinson Property at Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California, November 4, 2004. 13. Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., UST Closure Clarification Letter, 336 Unit Residential Development, Riverside Drive at Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore, April 27, 2006. Village at Lakeshore Expanded Initial Study 7-2 Appendix B Letter Update - Air Quality & Biological Resources, March 2015 PI_ANNING GROUP March 31, 2015 Justin Kirk Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 674-3124 ext 284 Subject: Letter of Adequacy regarding the original Air Quality Impact Analysis done for the Village at Lakeshore project. The Village at Lakeshore project originally was planned to have 146 medium density attached multifamily residential units. The revised plan now has 163 detached single family homes. This represents an increase of 17 units, with the overall layout of the community remaining relatively consistent. Albert A. Webb Associates completed the original Air Quality study in September 2005 utilizing URBEMIS 2002 for Windows verison 8.7.0, as recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff. SCAQMD has since updated the regional significance thresholds in October 2006; however, these thresholds have remained the same since the original study was done; shown below: SCAQMD CEQA Regional Sienificance Thresholds Emission Threshold Units ROG NO CO sq, PM -10 Daily Threshold—Construction lbs/day 75 100 550 150 150 Daily Threshold—Operations lbs/day 55 55 550 150 150 Findings from the original study concluded that "both project construction (short-term) and project operation (long-term) will not exceed the SCAQMD established regional thresholds of significance." The impact of adding 17 units to this project would be extremely minute. Webb's original modeling numbers for short-term construction thresholds are shown on Table 3, Estimated Construction Emissions per Phase; and Table 4, Estimated Construction Emissions per Month; along with long-term operational thresholds shown on Table 5, Estimated Daily Project Operation Emissions (Summer); and Table 6, Estimated Daily Project Operation Emissions (Winter). These numbers are significantly lower than the applicable SCAQMD local and regional threshold limits, most below 20 percent of the threshold. Due to the project's extremely small impact on air quality, 17 additional units will have no effect in reaching the threshold limits. Webb's original study outlined three mitigation measures pertaining to project construction. These mitigation measures shall remain with the project and be implemented to their fullest: 949.724.0640 l'I �� �`,'Bi quit^>,, ..an -.t iriE l«io r.plani u�c-t:orn i„SII f>e, h c �y�'�6o ptemp'�roi a, emj. tc np.,nning com MM Air 1: During construction, mobile construction equipment will be properly maintained at an offsite location, which includes proper tuning and timing of engines. Equipment maintenance records and equipment design specification data sheets shall be kept on-site during construction. MM Air 2: Prohibit all vehicles from idling in excess of ten minutes, both on-site and off-site. MM Air 3: Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. These mitigation measures, though very important, will have virtually no affect during the long term operation of this project. Nor will the added 17 units result in a significant addition to the air quality impacts of this project. Sincerely, 03/31/2015 Peter Templeton, Date Principal TEMPLETON ; PLANNING GROUP March 31, 2015 Justin Kirk Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 674-3124 ext 284 Subject: Letter of Adequacy regarding the original Biological study done for the Village at Lakeshore project. The Village at Lakeshore project originally was planned to have 146 medium density attached multifamily residential units. The revised plan now has 162 detached single family homes. This represents an increase of 17 units, with the overall layout of the community remaining relatively consistent. To establish that the original study remains valid per the revised site plan, a thorough analysis of the original biological study was done and compared to the site today via Google images. The original biological field survey was done by Scott Crawford of Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) on May 28, 2004. His study was conducted to determine if the proposed development of the project site is fully consistent with the requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Mr. Crawford's findings showed that the site had been "subject to long-term disturbance associated with dry -land farming and disking;" and there were "no jurisdictional drainage features [that] occur on site." "Based upon MSHCP designations, the proposed Project Site is not located in an area that requires habitat assessments for any sensitive wildlife species, narrow endemic plant species, or criteria area plants;" "no riparian/riverine or vernal pool habitat is present;" and "development of the Site will not likely impact the urban/wildlands interface and an urban/wildlands interface assessment is not recommended." The recommendations by MBA are to "adherence to the guidelines of the MSHCP's IA [Implementing Agreement] and payment of the County's MSHCP mitigation fee, no further mitigation/action will be required." The only active remediation pertained to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This recommendation stated that "Based upon the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and CDFG Codes, removal of any trees, shrubs or any other potential nesting habitat, should be conducted outside the nesting season." Upon reviewing the Local Vicinity Map on Exhibit 1 of MBA's study and comparing it to present day Google Map and Google Earth images the site remains to be in a well preserved state since 2004, with minor differences from an aerial view. All trees seem to remain in their locations and no new trees present. The only visual difference between the Exhibit image and Google images is the darker shaded area along the northern corner in the Exhibit. This may be due to small plants that were once located there and have since been disked and graded over, or due to the time of year the photo was taken. Presently there are visually no new plant or wildlife within the site since the original study was 949.724-OC40 Ph corn Newpoi i. Bcuh `q_`i.o !)IL-1 lip efofCptoIIr tonE?ian n i nc.com conducted. The change in site plan is minute and unaffected by the biological resources within the project site. Sincerely, 03/31/2015 Peter Templeton, Date Principal Appendix C Updated Geotechnical Investigation, April 14, 2015 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Tract 33267 North Corner Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California for Paradigm Engineering Group April 14, 2015 Paradigm Engineering Group 427 East 17t" Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 Attention: Mr. Peter M. Clain Project No.: 15G136-2 Subject: Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development Tract 33267 North Corner Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California Gentlemen: 1 In accordance with your request, we have conducted a geotechnical investigation and liquefaction evaluation at the subject site. We are pleased to present this report summarizing the conclusions and recommendations developed from our investigation. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. We look forward to providing additional consulting services during the course of the project. If we may be of further assistance in any manner, please contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC, 'G,p33�: f tkF=��iz;1L Daryl . Kas, CEG 2467 Project Geologist ° No. 2467 CERTIFIED Jo n . Seminara, GE 2294 Principal Engineer Distribution: (2) Addressee 22885 Savi Ranch Parkway Suite E Yorba Linda . California — 92887 voice: (714) 685-1115 fax: (714) 685-1118 . www.socalgeo.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 3 3.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 3.1 Site Conditions 4 3.2 Proposed Development 4 3.3 Previous Studies 4 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 7 4.1 Scope of Exploration/Sampling Methods 4.2 Geotechnical Conditions 5.0 LABORATORY TESTING 9 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations 11 6.2 Geotechnical Design Considerations 15 6.3 Site Grading Recommendations 16 6.4 Construction Considerations 18 6.5 Foundation Design and Construction 19 6.6 Floor Slab Design and Construction 21 6.7 Exterior Flatwork Design and Construction 22 6.8 Landscape Wall Construction 23 6.9 Planters and Planter Walls 23 6.10 Retaining Wall Design and Construction 23 6.11 Pavement Design Parameters 25 7.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 28 8.0 REFERENCES 29 APPENDICES A Plate 1: Site Location Map E Plate E-1: Seismic Design Parameters Plate 2: Boring Location Plan Plate E-2: MCE Peak Ground Acceleration B Boring Logs F Liquefaction Evaluation Spreadsheets C Laboratory Testing G Excerpts from Previous Study D Grading Guide Specifications SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA S G1OUTHERN Project No. 15G136-2 LIFORNIA __croTECHNICAL 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Presented below is a brief summary of the conclusions and recommendations of this investigation. Since this summary is not all inclusive, it should be read in complete context with the entire report. Site Preparation • Initial site preparation should include stripping of any surficial vegetation from the site. At the time of our investigation, ground surface cover throughout most of the site consisted of heavy to moderate grass and weed growth with scattered trees and bushes in the northern portion of the site. • The near surface soils consist of artificial fill and native alluvium with moderate porosity, and relatively low strengths. • Remedial grading is recommended to be performed within the new building pad areas in order to provide a uniform layer of compacted structural fill soils beneath the proposed building pads. The existing soils within the building pad areas should be overexcavated to a depth of 6 feet below existing grade and to a depth of 6 feet below proposed pad grade, whichever is greater. • Overexcavation in the proposed interior street areas may be limited to a depth of 2 feet below existing grade, or 2 feet below proposed grade, whichever is greater. • After overexcavation has been completed, the resulting subgrade soils should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer to identify any additional soils that should be overexcavated. The overexcavation subgrade should be moisture conditioned, and recompacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. The previously excavated soils may then be replaced as compacted structural fill. Liquefaction • Our site-specific liquefaction evaluation indicates that some of the on-site soils are subject to liquefaction during the design seismic event. • The liquefaction analysis indicates a potential for total dynamic settlements of 2.69 to 2.89 inches at the site. The liquefaction -induced differential settlements within the building areas are expected to be on the order of 1.4 inches. Assuming that these settlements occur across a distance of 50± feet, a maximum angular distortion of 0.0025± inches per inch would result. • Standard practice dictates that the proposed improvements can be supported on shallow foundation systems, with the understanding that some cosmetic distress could occur due to liquefaction. Such distress will be typical of buildings of this type, in this area, in the event of a large earthquake. Building Foundations • Conventional shallow foundations, supported in newly placed compacted fill. 2,000 lbs/ft' maximum allowable soil bearing pressure. Reinforcement consisting of at least four (4) No. 5 rebars (2 top and 2 bottom) in strip footings, due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. Additional reinforcement may be necessary for structural considerations. SOLTIHN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIACHNIC Project No. 15G136-2 U LOIICIISICAI Page 1 Building and Garage Floor Slabs • Conventional Slabs -on -Grade, 5 -inches minimum thickness due to liquefaction potential. • Minimum reinforcement of the floor slab should consist of No. 4 bars at 18 -inches on center in both directions, due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. The actual floor slab reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer. Driveways and Exterior Flatwork • Conventional Slabs -on -Grade, 4 -inches minimum thickness. • Minimum reinforcement consisting of conventional welded wire mesh (6x6-W1.4xW1.4 WWF). The actual floor slab reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer. Pavements ASPHALT PAVEMENTS (R = 30) Materials Thickness (inches) Interior Cul-de-sacs TI = 4.5 Interior Collector Streets TI = 5.5 Asphalt Concrete 3 31/2 Aggregate Base 5 7 Compacted Subgrade 90% minimum com action 12 12 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS Materials Thickness (inches) Interior Cul-de-sacs TI = 4.5 Interior Collector Streets TI = 5.5 PCC 5 51h Compacted Subgrade (95% minimum compaction) 12 12 SOL IHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 156136-2 "W t101LUNICAL Pagel 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services performed for this project was in accordance with our Proposal No. 15P173R, dated March 19, 2015. The scope of services included a visual site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, field and laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering analysis to provide criteria for preparing the design of the building foundations, building floor slabs, and parking lot pavements along with site preparation recommendations and construction considerations for the proposed development. Based on the location of the subject site, this investigation also included a site-specific liquefaction evaluation. The evaluation of the environmental aspects of this site was beyond the scope of services for this geotechnical investigation. SOUTHLRN Proposed Residential Development - Lake Elsinore, CA .,�_. CALIFORNIA Project No. 156136-2 t LOTICHNICAL Page 3 3.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Site Conditions The subject site is located at the north corner of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue in Lake Elsinore, California. The site is bounded to the northwest and northeast by a concrete lined flood control channel, to the southeast by Riverside Drive, and to the southwest by Grand Avenue. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Site Location Map, included as Plate 1 in Appendix A of this report. The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped parcel, 20.23± acres in size. This parcel is also identified as Tract 33267. The subject site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The ground surface cover consists of exposed soil with moderate to dense native grass and weed growth. Several trees are located in the northern area of the site. Detailed topographic information was provided by VA Consulting, Inc. Based on the plan, the site grades range from 1302± feet mean sea level (msl) at the west corner of the site to 1272± feet msl at the east corner of the site. There is a total 30± feet if elevation differential across the subject site. The overall topography slopes gently downward to the northeast at a gradient of approximately 2 percent, toward Lake Elsinore. 3.2 Proposed Development A site plan prepared by VA Consulting, Inc. was provided to our office by the client. The site plan indicates that the site will be developed with 163 condominiums. We understand that the condominiums will be two stories in height and will be surrounded by landscape planter areas and concrete flatwork. Several asphaltic concrete interior streets will be constructed throughout the site. A playground and recreation area will be developed in the northcentral area of the site. It is assumed that proposed buildings will be of wood frame and stucco construction, presumably supported on conventional shallow foundations and concrete slab on grade floors. Based on the proposed construction, maximum column and wall loads are expected to be on the order of 30 kips and 2 to 3 kips per linear foot, respectively. The proposed development is not expected to include any significant amounts of below grade construction such as basements or crawl spaces. Based on the assumed topography, cuts and fills of up to 4 to S± feet are expected to be necessary to achieve the proposed building pad grades. 3.3 Previous Studies SCG performed the referenced geotechnical investigation for the subject site and three additional parcels in 2004. At that time, the proposed site development for the subject site SOU HE R4 Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 vGEOL LEAN CAI. Page 4 consisted of 181 single family residences. This report was developed using the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) and 2001 California Building Code (CBC). As part of the geotechnical investigation, eight (8) borings were drilled to depths of 20 to 50t feet. In addition, two (2) trenches were excavated to depths of 9t feet. The borings encountered topsoil at all of the boring and trench locations to depths of 4 to 6t inches. Artificial fill soils were encountered beneath the topsoil at several of the boring locations extending to depths of 21/2 to 3t feet. The fill soils consisted of medium dense to dense clayey fine sands, silty fine sands, clayey fine to medium sands, and silty fine to medium sands. Possible fill soils were encountered at two of the boring locations extending to depths of 41/2 to 5tfeet. The possible fill soils consisted of clayey fine to medium sands and silty fine to medium sands. Native alluvial soils were encountered beneath the topsoil, fill, or possible fill soils at all of the boring and trench locations extending to the maximum depth of 50t feet. The native soils consisted of loose to very dense silty fine sands, clayey fine sands, silty fine to medium sands, and clayey fine to medium sands to a depth of 50t feet. The referenced geotechnical report included a site specific liquefaction evaluation. The results of the liquefaction evaluation indicated that potentially liquefiable soils were identified at depths of 5 to 27t feet, under the design seismic event that was specified by the 1997 UBC/2001 CBC. The results of the liquefaction evaluation indicated potential total and differential dynamic settlements of 3.4 and 2.3 inches, respectively. Geotechnical design considerations identified during the referenced investigation include loose, settlement prone soils in the upper 5t feet below the existing site grades, and liquefaction potential. Remedial grading was recommended in order to remove the loose soils and to provide a uniform layer of compacted structural fill beneath new floor slabs and foundations. Structural mitigation was recommended for the potential liquefaction settlements. It was recommended that foundations and floor slabs be designed to resist the potential total and differential settlements calculated for the liquefaction evaluation. SCG also performed the referenced fault study for the subject site and one additional parcel in 2004. As part of this investigation, a fault trench was excavated at the subject site to a maximum depth of 181/2± feet. The fault trench was 49 feet in length and was excavated with an orientation of N 400 E. The orientation of the trench was roughly perpendicular to the mapped Wildomar Branch of the Elsinore fault zone. Artificial fill was identified extending to a depth of 11/2± feet. The fill consisted of loose to medium dense sandy silt. Beneath the fill soils, younger alluvial soils were encountered. The younger alluvial soils consisted of medium dense fin sandy silt with some porosity and varying amounts of calcareous concretions throughout extending to 5t feet. Between 5 to 91/2t feet, the alluvium grades to a medium dense silty fine to medium sand with many soil inclusions. The underlying alluvium consisted of fine to coarse sand with some silt extending to 16t feet. Below 16t feet, alluvium consisted of very moist to west sandy clay extending to a depth of 181/2± feet, the maximum depth explored. Historical aerial photographs were also reviewed. The photographs span the period of 1948 through 2000. A depression trending northwest -southeast was apparent on the subject site. This depression was parallel to the mapped trace of the Wildomar Fault. SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 156136-2 GEOTECHNICAL Page 5 SCG concluded that there was positive evidence that a potentially active fault (Wildomar Fault) transects the subject site. SCG recommended that the development incorporate structural setbacks 50 feet on either side of the potentially active fault. 901IItERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No, 15G136-2 GOIkUINICAL Page 6 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 4.1 Scope of Exploration/ Sampling Methods The subsurface exploration conducted for this project consisted of two (2) borings advanced to depths of 50± feet below currently existing site grades, as part of the liquefaction evaluation. All of the borings were logged during drilling by a member of our staff. As discussed in Section 3.3 of this report, the SCG previously performed eight (8) borings at the subject site, extending to depths of 20 to 50± feet and two (2) trenches excavated to a depth of 9± feet as a part of the referenced investigation. The borings were advanced with hollow -stem augers, by a truck -mounted drilling rig and the trenches were excavated with a rubber tire backhoe. Representative bulk and in-situ soil samples were taken during drilling. In-situ samples were taken using a 1.4± inch inside diameter split spoon sampler, in general accordance with ASTM D-1586. The samplers are driven into the ground with successive blows of a 140 -pound weight falling 30 inches. The blow counts obtained during driving are recorded for further analysis. Bulk samples were collected in plastic bags to retain their original moisture content. The approximate locations of the borings and trenches are indicated on the Boring and Trench Location Plan, included as Plate 2 in Appendix A of this report. The Boring Logs, which illustrate the conditions encountered at the boring locations, as well as the results of some of the laboratory testing, are included in Appendix B. The boring and trench logs for the six borings performed for the referenced geotechnical investigation are included in Appendix G. 4.2 Geotechnical Conditions Artificial Fill Artificial fill soils were encountered at the ground surface at Boring No, B-17. The fill soils consist of dense silty fine sands to fine sandy silts, extending to a depth of 21/2± feet. The fill soils possess a disturbed appearance, resulting in their classification as artificial fill. Alluvium Native alluvium was encountered at the ground surface or beneath the fill soils at all of the boring and trench locations which extend to the maximum depth explored of 50± feet. The near -surface native alluvial soils consist of medium dense silty fine sands and fine sandy silts and stiff clayey silts extending to dense of 12± feet. Beneath these soils, the alluvium consist of medium dense clayey fine sands, silty fine sands, and fine sandy silts extending to a depth of 32± feet. Extending from 32± feet to 50± feet, the alluvium consists of medium dense to dense silty fine sands, silty fine to medium sands, and fine to medium sands. SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. ISG136-2 v61.OfECIINICAL Page J Groundwater Free water was encountered during the drilling of Boring No. B-16 at a depth of 34t feet and Boring No. B-17 at a depth of 12t feet. In addition, groundwater was encountered at depths as shallow as 7t feet in the southwestern area of the subject site and groundwater was considered deeper than 30t feet in the northeastern area of the subject site during the previous investigation. The groundwater discrepancy suggests a northwest -trending groundwater barrier is present at the subject site. This groundwater barrier is associated with the suspected northwest extension of the Wildomar fault. As part of our research, we reviewed available historic groundwater data in order to determine a historic high groundwater table for the subject site. Our research included the California Water Data Library website, the Western Municipal Water District Cooperative Well Measuring Program quarterly reports, and environmental reports available from the Geotracker data base. However, the available data was not sufficient to determine a historic high groundwater level for the subject site, due to the lack of data available for wells located near the site and at similar elevations. The historic high groundwater level was therefore determined from groundwater levels from previous studies, the current groundwater, and by an examination of the samples recovered during drilling at the site. Based on the information from the previous studies and the existing investigation, the historic high groundwater is considered to be approximately 5 feet. Due to the groundwater barrier located at the site, a historic groundwater depth of 5 feet is considered to be conservative. soUIHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA C 11 IFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 V U01 Page 8 5.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples recovered from the subsurface exploration were returned to our laboratory for further testing to determine selected physical and engineering properties of the soils. The tests are briefly discussed below. It should be noted that the test results are specific to the actual samples tested, and variations could be expected at other locations and depths. Classification All recovered soil samples were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), in accordance with ASTM D-2488. The field identifications were then supplemented with additional visual classifications and/or by laboratory testing. The USCS classifications are shown on the Boring and Trench Logs and are periodically referenced throughout this report. Moisture Content The moisture contents for all of the recovered samples are determined in accordance with ASTM D-2216, and are expressed as a percentage of the dry weight. These test results are presented on the Boring and Trench Logs. Soluble Sulfates Representative samples of the near -surface soils were submitted to a subcontracted analytical laboratory for determination of soluble sulfate content. Soluble sulfates are naturally present in soils, and if the concentration is high enough, can result in degradation of concrete which comes into contact with these soils. The results of the soluble sulfate testing are presented below, and are discussed further in a subsequent section of this report. Sample Identification B-17 @ 0 to 5 feet Expansion Index Soluble Sulfates (%) 0.005 ACI Classification Negligible The expansion potential of the on-site soils was determined in general accordance with ASTM D- 4829 as required by the California Building Code (CBC). The testing apparatus is designed to accept a 4 -inch diameter, 1 -in high, remolded sample. The sample is initially remolded to 50t 1 percent saturation and then loaded with a surcharge equivalent to 144 pounds per square foot. The sample is then inundated with water, and allowed to swell against the surcharge. The resultant swell or consolidation is recorded after a 24-hour period. The results of the EI testing are as follows: Sample Identification Expansion Index Expansive Potential B-17 @ 0 to 5 feet 4 Very Low (Non -Expansive) SOL111ERN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No, 156136-2 GLOIECIINICAL Page 9 Grain Size Analysis Limited grain size analyses have been performed on several selected samples, in accordance with ASTM D-1140. These samples were washed over a #200 sieve to determine the percentage of fine-grained material in each sample, which is defined as the material which passes the #200 sieve. The weight of the portion of the sample retained on each screen is recorded and the percentage finer or coarser of the total weight is calculated. The results of these tests are presented on the Boring Logs. Atterberg Limits Atterberg Limits testing (ASTM D-4318) was performed on selected samples. This test is used to determine the Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of the soil. The Plasticity Index (PI) is the difference between the two limits. The results of the Atterberg Limits testing are used to evaluate the liquefaction potential of the fine grained soils encountered below the historic high ground water table. The results of the Atterberg Limits testing are presented on the Boring Logs. Consolidation At the time of the referenced geotechnical report, selected soil samples were tested to determine their consolidation potential, in accordance with ASTM D-2435. The testing apparatus is designed to accept either natural or remolded samples in a one -inch high ring, approximately 2.416 inches in diameter. Each sample is then loaded incrementally in a geometric progression and the resulting deflection is recorded at selected time intervals. Porous stones are in contact with the top and bottom of the sample to permit the addition or release of pore water. The samples are typically inundated with water at an intermediate load to determine their potential for collapse or heave. The results of the consolidation testing are plotted on Plates C-1 through C-12 in Appendix G of this report. Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content A representative bulk sample was tested for its maximum dry density and optimum moisture content. The results have been obtained using the Modified Proctor procedure, per ASTM D- 1557. These tests are generally used to compare the in-situ densities of undisturbed field samples, and for later compaction testing. Additional testing of other soil type or soil mixes may be necessary at a later date. The result of the testing is plotted on Plate C-5 in Appendix C of this report. SOLI CRR' Proposed Residential DevelopmentLake Elsinore, CA MY CALIFORNIA Pa MY Project No. 1 ge010 Gl!01MINICAI 9 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our review, field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis, the proposed development is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The recommendations contained in this report should be taken into the design, construction, and grading considerations. The recommendations are contingent upon all grading and foundation construction activities being monitored by the geotechnical engineer of record. The Grading Guide Specifications, included as Appendix D, should be considered part of this report, and should be incorporated into the project specifications. The contractor and/or owner of the development should bring to the attention of the geotechnical engineer any conditions that differ from those stated in this report, or which may be detrimental for the development. 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations The subject site is located in an area which is subject to strong ground motions due to earthquakes. The performance of a site specific seismic hazards analysis was beyond the scope of this investigation. However, numerous faults capable of producing significant ground motions are located near the subject site. Due to economic considerations, it is not generally considered reasonable to design a structure that is not susceptible to earthquake damage. Therefore, significant damage to structures may be unavoidable during large earthquakes. The proposed structures should, however, be designed to resist structural collapse and thereby provide reasonable protection from serious injury, catastrophic property damage and loss of life. Faulting and Seismicity Research of available maps indicates that the subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The subject site is also not located within a Riverside County fault zone. However, maps published by the Riverside County GIS department, indicate that the site is located adjacent to two Riverside County fault zones. Furthermore, as stated in the previous studies section of this report, SCG performed a fault study in 2004. SCG identified a potentially active fault trending northwest -southeast which transects the subject site. SCG recommended the development incorporate structural setbacks of 50t feet on either side of the potentially active fault. The potential for other geologic hazards such as seismically induced settlement, lateral spreading, tsunamis, inundation, seiches, flooding, and subsidence affecting the site is considered low. Seismic Design Parameters The 2013 California Building Code (CBC) was adopted by all municipalities within Southern California on January 1, 2014. The CBC provides procedures for earthquake resistant structural design that include considerations for on-site soil conditions, occupancy, and the configuration of the structure including the structural system and height. The seismic design parameters presented below are based on the soil profile and the proximity of known faults with respect to the subject site. SOU II)FRN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA �. CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 GEO EGINICAL Page 11 The 2013 CBC Seismic Design Parameters have been generated using U.S. Seismic Design Maps, a web -based software application developed by the United States Geological Survey. This software application, available at the USGS web site, calculates seismic design parameters in accordance with the 2013 CBC, utilizing a database of deterministic site accelerations at 0.01 degree intervals. The table below is a compilation of the data provided by the USGS application. A copy of the output generated from this program is included as Plate E-1 in Appendix E of this report. A copy of the Design Response Spectrum, as generated by the USGS application is also included in Appendix E. Based on this output, the following parameters may be utilized for the subject site: 2013 CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Parameter Value Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 0.2 sec Period SS 2.295 Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1.0 sec Period S, 0.923 Site Class --- F* Site Modified Spectral Acceleration at 0.2 sec Period SMS 2.295 Site Modified Spectral Acceleration at 1.0 sec Period SMi 1.384 Design Spectral Acceleration at 0.2 sec Period SDS 1.530 Design Spectral Acceleration at 1.0 sec Period Set 0.923 *The 2013 CBC requires that Site Class F be assigned to any profile containing soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading, such as liquefiable soils. For Site Class F, the site coefficients are to be determined in accordance with Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7-10. However, Section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-10 indicates that for sites with structures having a fundamental period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 seconds, the site coefficient factors (F„ and F.) may be determined using the standard procedures. The fundamenta�eriod of the structure is less than 0.5 seconds. However, the results of the liquefaction evaluation indicate that the subject site is underlain by potentially liquefiable soils. Therefore, if the proposed structure has a fundamental period greater than 0.5 seconds, a site specific seismic hazards analysis would be required and additional subsurface exploration would be necessary. Ground Motion Parameters For the purposes of the liquefaction analysis performed for this study, we utilized a site acceleration that is consistent with maximum considered earthquake ground motions, as required by the 2013 CBC. The peak ground acceleration (PGAM) was determined in accordance with Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7-10. The parameter PGAM is the maximum considered earthquake geometric mean (MCEG) PGA, multiplied by the appropriate site coefficient from Table 11.8-1 of ASCE 7-10. The web -based software application U.S. Seismic Design Maps (described in the previous section) was used to determine PGAM, which is equal to 0.9148. A portion of the program output is included as Plate E-2 in Appendix E of this report. Liquefaction Review of the Riverside County GIS website indicates that the subject site is located within a mapped zone of high to very high liquefaction susceptibility. Therefore, the scope of this investigation included a detailed liquefaction evaluation in order to determine the site-specific liquefaction potential. SOLIHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 Page 12 (IOTL(RNLCAL Liquefaction is the loss of strength in generally cohesionless, saturated soils when the pore - water pressure induced in the soil by a seismic event becomes equal to or exceeds the overburden pressure. The primary factors which influence the potential for liquefaction include groundwater table elevation, soil type and plasticity characteristics, relative density of the soil, initial confining pressure, and intensity and duration of ground shaking. The depth within which the occurrence of liquefaction may impact surface improvements is generally identified as the upper 50 feet below the existing ground surface. Liquefaction potential is greater in saturated, loose, poorly graded fine sands with a mean (d5o) grain size in the range of 0.075 to 0.2 mm (Seed and Idriss, 1971). Non -sensitive clayey (cohesive) soils which possess a plasticity index of at least 18 (Bray and Sancio, 2006) are generally not considered to be susceptible to liquefaction, nor are those soils which are above the historic static groundwater table. The liquefaction analysis was conducted in accordance with the requirements of Special Publication 117A (CDMG, 2008), and currently accepted practice (SCEC, 1997). The liquefaction potential of the subject site was evaluated using the empirical method developed by Boulanger and Idriss (Boulanger and Idriss, 2008). This method predicts the earthquake -induced liquefaction potential of the site based on a given design earthquake magnitude and peak ground acceleration at the subject site. This procedure essentially compares the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) [the cyclic stress ratio required to induce liquefaction for a cohesionless soil stratum at a given depth] with the earthquake -induced cyclic stress ratio (CSR) at that depth from a specified design earthquake (defined by a peak ground surface acceleration and an associated earthquake moment magnitude). CRR is determined as a function of the corrected SPT N -value (1\1060-cs, adjusted for fines content. The factor of safety against liquefaction is defined as CRR/CSR. Based on Special Publication 117A, a factor of safety of at least 1.3 is required in order to demonstrate that a given soil stratum is non -liquefiable. Additionally, in accordance with Special Publication 117A, clayey soils which do not meet the criteria for liquefiable soils defined by Bray and Sancio (2006), loose soils with a plasticity index (PI) less than 12 and moisture content greater than 85% of the liquid limit, are not considered to be susceptible to liquefaction. However, soils with a PI between 12 and 18 may be moderately susceptible to liquefaction if the moisture content is greater than 80 percent of the liquid limit. Non -sensitive soils with a PI greater than 18 are also considered non -liquefiable. The liquefaction analysis procedure is tabulated on the spreadsheet forms included in Appendix F of this report. The liquefaction analysis procedure is tabulated on the spreadsheet forms included in Appendix F of this report. The liquefaction analysis was performed for the two (2) 50t -foot deep boring locations. The liquefaction potential was analyzed at the boring locations utilizing a PGAM of 0.914g related to a 6.97 magnitude seismic event. A historic high groundwater depth of 5 feet was used in the analysis, as discussed in Section 4.2 of this report. If liquefiable soils are identified, the potential settlements that could occur as a result of liquefaction are determined using the equation for volumetric strain due to post -cyclic reconsolidation (Yoshimine et. al, 2006). This procedure uses an empirical relationship between the induced cyclic shear strain and the corrected N -value to determine the expected volumetric strain of saturated sands subjected to earthquake shaking. This analysis is also documented on the spreadsheets included in Appendix F. so III LRN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA -... CALIFORNIA Project No. 1SG136-2 61OFECFINICAL Page 13 Conclusions and Recommendations The results of the liquefaction evaluation have identified liquefiable soils at both of the boring locations. Liquefiable soils were encountered at Boring No. B-16 at various depths between 7 and 50± feet and at Boring No. B-17 between depths of 7 and 22± feet. Soils which are located above the historic groundwater table (5 feet), or possess factors of safety of at least 1.3, are considered to be non -liquefiable. Some of the sandy clay strata encountered at the boring locations are considered non -liquefiable due to their cohesive characteristics and the results of the Atterberg limits testing with respect to the requirements of Special Publication 117A. Settlement analyses were conducted for each of the potentially liquefiable strata. The recommended remedial grading described in Section 6.3 of this report, will remove the existing soils from the proposed building pad areas, extending to a depth of at least 6 feet below the existing and proposed building pad grades. Additionally the bottom of the overexcavation will be scarified to a depth of 12 inches below the overexcavation subgrades and recompacted, resulting in 7± feet below the existing and proposed building pad grades, whichever is deeper. Therefore, the soils present between depth of 5 and 7± feet are also considered non -liquefiable. Based on the settlement analysis (also tabulated on the spreadsheets in Appendix F) total dynamic (liquefaction induced) settlements of 2.89± inches and 2.69 inches could be expected at Boring Nos. B-16 and B-17, respectively. The associated differential settlement is considered to be up to one-half of the total settlement value, or 1.4 inches. The estimated differential settlement can be assumed to occur across a distance of 50 feet, indicating a maximum angular distortion on the order of 0.0025 inches per inch. This settlement is considered to be within the structural tolerances of typical buildings supported on conventional foundation systems. However, it should be noted that minor to moderate repairs, including repair of damaged drywall and stucco, etc., could be required after the occurrence of liquefaction -induced settlements. Based on our understanding of the proposed development and the client's risk tolerances, it is considered feasible to support the proposed buildings on shallow foundation systems. Such foundation systems can be designed to resist the effects of the anticipated differential settlements, to the extent that the structures would not catastrophically fail. Designing the proposed buildings to remain completely undamaged during a major seismic event is not considered to be economically feasible. Based on this understanding, the use of shallow foundation systems is considered to be the most economical means of supporting the proposed residential buildings. In order to support the proposed buildings on shallow foundations (such as spread footings) the structural engineer should verify that the structure would not catastrophically fail due to the predicted total and differential settlements. Any utility connections to the structures should be designed to withstand the estimated dynamic settlements. It should also be noted that minor to moderate repairs, including releveling, restoration of utility connections, repair of damaged drywall and stucco, etc., would likely be required after occurrence of the liquefaction -induced settlements. The use of shallow foundation systems, as described in this report, is typical for buildings of these types, where they are underlain by the extent of liquefiable soils encountered at this site. The post -liquefaction damage that could occur within the buildings at this site will also be typical of similar buildings in the vicinity of this project. However, if the owner determines that this level 4OU IHCRN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA _ CALIFORNIA Project No. ISG136-2 =� (IOIECIINICA1 Page 19 of potential damage is not acceptable, other geotechnical and structural options are available, including the use of ground improvement, deep foundations or mat foundations. 6.2 Geotechnical Design Considerations General The subject site is generally underlain by localized variable strength fill and loose to medium dense, variable strength native alluvial soils extending to depths of approximately 5 to 6t feet below the existing site grades. The results of consolidation/collapse testing performed for the referenced geotechnical investigation and the current investigation indicate that the upper portion (upper 5 to 6t feet) of the near surface soils possess unfavorable consolidation characteristics. Furthermore, some of the samples from the previous geotechnical investigation in the upper S to 8t feet were observed to be slightly to moderately porous. Therefore, remedial grading is recommended in order to remove the fill soils and a portion of the near surface alluvium, and replace these materials as a new, uniform layer of compacted structural fill beneath the foundations and floor slabs of the proposed structures. As discussed in the previous section of this report, potentially liquefiable soils were identified at this site. The presence of the recommended layer of newly placed compacted structural fill above these liquefiable soils will help to reduce possible surface manifestations that could occur as a result of liquefaction. The foundation design recommendations presented in the subsequent sections of this report also contain recommendations to provide additional rigidity in order to reduce the potential effects of differential settlement that could occur as a result of liquefaction. Settlement The results of the consolidation/collapse testing indicate that the upper portion of the near surface native soils possess a moderate potential for collapse when exposed to moisture infiltration, and a moderate potential for consolidation when exposed to increases in the range of those that will be exerted by the foundations of the proposed structures. The recommended remedial grading will remove these soils and replace them as compacted structural fill. Following completion of the recommended grading, the post -construction settlements that could occur due to the near surface soils are expected to be within the structural tolerances of the proposed buildings. Soluble Sulfates The results of the soluble sulfate testing indicate that the selected sample of the on-site soils contains a negligible concentration of soluble sulfates, in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. Therefore, specialized concrete mix designs are not considered to be necessary, with regard to sulfate protection purposes. It is, however, recommended that additional soluble sulfate testing be conducted at the completion of rough grading to verify the soluble sulfate concentrations of the soils which are present at pad grade within the building area. SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA ... CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 6107tCII'iICAL Page 15 Expansion The near surface soils at this site generally consist of silty sands and fine sandy silts. Results of laboratory testing indicate that these materials possess a very low expansion potential (EI < 20). Therefore, no design considerations related to expansive soils are considered warranted for this project. It is recommended that additional expansion index testing be conducted at the completion of rough grading to verify the expansion potential of the as -graded building pad. Shrinkage/Subsidence Based on the results of the laboratory testing, removal and recompaction of the artificial fill and near -surface alluvium is estimated to result in an average shrinkage of 14 to 16 percent. Minor ground subsidence is expected to occur in the soils below the zone of removal, due to settlement and machinery working. The subsidence is estimated to be 0.1 feet. These estimates are based on previous experience and the subsurface conditions encountered at the test boring locations. The actual amount of subsidence is expected to be variable and will be dependant on the type of machinery used, repetitions of use, and dynamic effects, all of which are difficult to assess precisely. Grading and Foundation Plan Review As discussed previously, detailed foundation plans and grading plans were not available at the time of this report. It is therefore recommended that we be provided with copies of the plans, when they become available, for review with regard to the conclusions, recommendations, and assumptions contained within this report. 6.3 Site Grading Recommendations The grading recommendations presented below are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the boring locations and our understanding of the proposed development. We recommend that all grading activities be completed in accordance with the Grading Guide Specifications included as Appendix D of this report, unless superseded by site-specific recommendations presented below. Site Stripping and Demolition Initial site stripping should include removal of any surficial vegetation and organic debris. These materials should be disposed of off-site. Based on the conditions at the time of our subsurface exploration, site stripping is expected to be limited to removal of trees, bushes, and areas of native grass and weed growth. The actual extent of site stripping should be determined in the field by the geotechnical engineer, based on the organic content and stability of the materials encountered. Treatment of Existing Soils: Building Pads Remedial grading is recommended within the new building pad areas to remove the existing fill and near -surface, variable strength, collapsible alluvium and replace these materials as compacted structural fill. The upper portion of the native soils within the proposed building areas SOUH RN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15Page 16 GEOTECHNICAL should be removed to a depth of at least 6 feet below the existing site grades. In order to provide a uniform subgrade for support of the proposed buildings, it is also recommended that the overexcavation extend to a depth of at least 6 feet below the proposed building pad subgrade elevations. Deeper removals of unsuitable soils may be necessary where loose, moderately porous, alluvial soils are encountered. The overexcavation areas should extend at least 5 feet beyond the building and foundation perimeters and to an extent equal to the depth of fill below the foundation. If the proposed structures incorporate any exterior columns (such as for a canopy or overhang) the overexcavation should also encompass these areas. Following completion of the overexcavation, the subgrade soils within the building areas should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer to verify their suitability to serve as the structural fill subgrade, as well as to support the foundation loads of the new structures. This evaluation should include proofrolling and probing to identify any soft, loose or otherwise unstable soils that must be removed. Some localized areas of deeper excavation may be required if additional fill materials or loose, porous, or low density native soils are encountered at the base of the overexcavation. After a suitable overexcavation subgrade has been achieved, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches, moisture treated to 2 to 4 percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted. The previously excavated soils may then be replaced as compacted structural fill. Treatment of Existing Soils: Retaining Walls and Site Walls The existing soils within the areas of any proposed retaining walls should be overexcavated to a depth of 2 feet below foundation bearing grade and replaced as compacted structural fill as discussed above for the proposed building pads. The foundation areas for non -retaining site walls should be overexcavated to a depth of 2 feet below proposed foundation bearing grade. The overexcavation subgrade soils should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer prior to scarifying, moisture conditioning, and recompacting the upper 12 inches of exposed subgrade soils. The previously excavated soils may then be replaced as compacted structural fill. Treatment of Existing Soils: Interior Streets It is recommended that the artificial fill and/or upper portion of the native soils within the proposed street areas be removed to a depth of at least 2 feet below the existing site grades. In order to provide a uniform subgrade for support of the proposed improvements, it is also recommended that the overexcavation extend to a depth of at least 2 feet below the proposed subgrade elevations. The subgrade soils should then be scarified to a depth of 12 f inches, moisture conditioned to 2 to 4 percent above the optimum moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density SOUMERN Proposed Residential Development—Lake Elsinore, CA CAMIORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 - GUOIEC}INICAI Page 17 Fill Placement • Fill soils should be placed in thin (6t inches), near -horizontal lifts, moisture conditioned to 2 to 4 percent of the optimum moisture content, and compacted. • On-site soils may be used for fill provided they are cleaned of any debris to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer. • All grading and fill placement activities should be completed in accordance with the requirements of the CBC and the grading code of the city of Lake Elsinore. • All fill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. Fill soils should be well mixed. • Compaction tests should be performed periodically by the geotechnical engineer as random verification of compaction and moisture content. These tests are intended to aid the contractor. Since the tests are taken at discrete locations and depths, they may not be indicative of the entire fill and therefore should not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to meet the job specifications. Imported Structural Fill All imported structural fill should consist of very low to low (EI < 50), well graded soils possessing at least 10 percent fines (that portion of the sample passing the No. 200 sieve). Additional specifications for structural fill are presented in the Grading Guide Specifications, included as Appendix D. Utility Trench Backfill In general, all utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D- 1557 maximum dry density. Compacted trench backfill should conform to the requirements of the local grading code, and more restrictive requirements may be indicated by the city of Lake Elsinore. All utility trench backfills should be witnessed by the geotechnical engineer. The trench backfill soils should be compaction tested where possible; probed and visually evaluated elsewhere. Utility trenches which parallel a footing, and extending below a 1h:1v plane projected from the outside edge of the footing should be backfilled with structural fill soils, compacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 standard. Pea gravel backfill should not be used for these trenches. 6.4 Construction Considerations Excavation Considerations The near -surface soils generally consist of silty fine sands and clayey fine sands. These materials are expected to be subject to minor caving within shallow excavations. Where caving occurs in shallow excavations, flattened excavation slopes (1.5h:ly) may be sufficient to provide excavation stability. Deeper excavations may require some form of external stabilization such as shoring or bracing. Maintaining adequate moisture content within the near -surface soils will improve excavation stability. All excavation activities on this site should be conducted in accordance with Cal -OSHA regulations. SOL ll Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA P Project No. 15agee6-8 �, CA01KBICA1 9 Moisture Sensitive Subgrade Soils Most of the near surface soils possess appreciable silt and clay content and may become unstable if exposed to significant moisture infiltration or disturbance by construction traffic. In addition, based on their granular content, some of the on-site soils will also be susceptible to erosion. The site should, therefore, be graded to prevent ponding of surface water and to prevent water from running into excavations. Groundwater As discussed in Section 4.2 of this report, groundwater was encountered at varying depths across the site due to a groundwater barrier. The groundwater is expected to be as shallow as 7t feet in the southwestern area of the site and approximately 34t feet in the northeastern area of the site. Based on this depth to groundwater, and the assumed extend of grading, it is not expected that groundwater will affect excavations for foundations or shallow utilities. If excavation below depths of 8t feet is necessary for utility construction, some form of dewatering will likely be required. In this event, the geotechnical engineer should be contacted for supplementary recommendations. Groundwater is not expected to impact the proposed grading or foundation construction activities. 6.5 Foundation Design and Construction Based on the preceding grading recommendations, it is assumed that the new building pads will be underlain by structural fill soils used to replace the existing compressible native soils. The new structural fill soils are expected to extend to a depth of at least 6 feet below proposed building pad subgrade elevation. Based on this subsurface profile, and based on the design considerations presented in Section 6.1 or this report, the proposed buildings may be supported on shallow foundation systems. Building Foundation Design Parameters New square and rectangular footings may be designed as follows: • Maximum, net allowable soil bearing pressure: 2,000 lbs/ftz. • Minimum wall/column footing width: 14 inches/24 inches. • Minimum longitudinal steel reinforcement within strip footings: Four (4) No. 5 rebars (2 top and 2 bottom) due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. • Minimum foundation embedment: 12 inches into suitable structural fill soils, and at least 24 inches below adjacent grade. • It is recommended that the perimeter building foundations be continuous across all exterior doorways. Any flatwork adjacent to the exterior doors should be doweled into the perimeter foundations in a manner determined by the structural engineer. SOLIH[RN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA �CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 if (FOUCHNICAL Page 19 The allowable bearing pressures presented above may be increased by 1/3 when considering short duration wind or seismic loads. The minimum steel reinforcement recommended above is based on standard geotechnical practice, give the magnitude of predicted seismically induced settlements, and the structure type proposed for this site. Additional rigidity may be necessary for structural considerations, or to resist the effects of the seismically -induced settlements discussed in Section 6.1. The actual design of the foundations should be determined by the structural engineer. Foundation Construction The foundation subgrade soils should be evaluated at the time of overexcavation, as discussed in Section 6.3 of this report. It is further recommended that the foundation subgrade soils be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer immediately prior to steel or concrete placement. Within the new building areas, soils suitable for direct foundation support should consist of newly placed structural fill, compacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. Any unsuitable materials should be removed to a depth of suitable bearing compacted structural fill or competent native alluvial soils, with the resulting excavations backfilled with compacted fill soils. As an alternative, lean concrete slurry (500 to 1,500 psi) may be used to backfill such isolated overexcavations. The foundation subgrade soils should also be properly moisture conditioned to 2 to 4 percent of the Modified Proctor optimum, to a depth of at least 12 inches below bearing grade. Since it is typically not feasible to increase the moisture content of the floor slab and foundation subgrade soils once rough grading has been completed, care should be taken to maintain the moisture content of the building pad subgrade soils throughout the construction process. Estimated Foundation Settlements Post -construction total and differential settlements of shallow foundations designed and constructed in accordance with the previously presented recommendations are estimated to be less than 1.0 and 0.5 inches, respectively, under static conditions. Differential movements are expected to occur over a 30 -foot span, thereby resulting in an angular distortion of less than 0.002 inches per inch. These settlements are in addition to the liquefaction -induced settlements previously discussed in Section 6.1 of this report. However, the likelihood of these two settlements combining is considered remote. The static settlements are expected to occur in a relatively short period of time after the building loads being applied to the foundations, during and immediately subsequent to construction. It should be noted that the projected potential dynamic settlement is related to a major seismic event and a conservative historic high groundwater level. Lateral Load Resistance Lateral load resistance will be developed by a combination of friction acting at the base of foundations and slabs and the passive earth pressure developed by footings below grade. The following friction and passive pressure may be used to resist lateral forces: • Passive Earth Pressure: 300 Ibs/ft3 • Friction Coefficient: 0.30 SUTFERN Proposed Residential Development - Lake Elsinore, CA . v CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 ( FOTECIINICAL Page 20 These are allowable values, and include a factor of safety. When combining friction and passive resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. These values assume that footings will be poured directly against compacted structural fill. The maximum allowable passive pressure is 2,500 Ibs/ft2. 6.6 Floor Slab Design and Construction Subgrades which will support new floor slabs should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Site Grading Recommendations section of this report. Based on the anticipated grading which will occur at this site, the floors of the new structures may be constructed as conventional slabs -on -grade supported on newly placed structural fill, extending to a depth of at least 6 feet below finished pad grade. Based on geotechnical considerations, the floor slab may be designed as follows: • Minimum slab thickness: 5 inches. • Minimum slab reinforcement: Reinforcement of the floor slab should consist of No. 4 bars at 18 -inches on center in both directions due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. The actual floor slab reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer, based upon the imposed loading. • Slab underlayment should consist of a moisture vapor barrier constructed below the entire areas of proposed slabs -on -grade. In areas where the moisture sensitive floor coverings are not expected, such as garages, the moisture vapor barrier may be omitted. The moisture vapor barrier should meet or exceed the Class A rating as defined by ASTM E 1745-97 and have a permeance rating less than 0.01 perms as described in ASTM E 96-95 and ASTM E 154-88. The moisture vapor barrier should be properly constructed in accordance with all applicable manufacturer specifications. Given that a rock free subgrade is anticipated and that a capillary break is not required, sand below the barrier is not required. The need for sand and/or the amount of sand above the moisture vapor barrier should be specified by the structural engineer or concrete contractor. The selection of sand above the barrier is not a geotechnical engineering issue and hence outside our purview. • Moisture condition the floor slab subgrade soils to 2 to 4 percent of the Modified Proctor optimum moisture content, to a depth of 12 inches. The moisture content of the floor slab subgrade soils should be verified by the geotechnical engineer within 24 hours prior to concrete placement. • Proper concrete curing techniques should be utilized to reduce the potential for slab curling or the formation of excessive shrinkage cracks. • The floor slab should be structurally connected to the foundations as detailed by the structural engineer. The actual design of the floor slab should be completed by the structural engineer to verify adequate thickness and reinforcement. The steel reinforcement recommendations presented above are based on standard geotechnical practice, given the magnitude of predicted 50UT11ERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 156136-2 GP.07`ECHN'ICAL Page 21 liquefaction settlement for this site. Additional rigidity may be necessary for structural considerations, or to resist the effects of the seismically -induced differential settlements discussed in Section 6.1 of this report. 6.7 Exterior Flatwork Design and Construction Subgrades which will support new exterior slabs -on -grade for patios, sidewalks and driveways should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Grading Recommendations section of this report. Based on geotechnical considerations, exterior slabs on grade may be designed as follows: Minimum slab thickness: 4 inches • Minimum slab reinforcement: Driveway slabs or other flatwork which may be subjected to vehicular traffic should include conventional welded wire mesh (6x6—W1.4xW1.4 WWF). Reinforcement in other exterior flatwork is not required, with respect to geotechnical conditions. • Moisture condition the flatwork subgrade soils to a moisture content of 2 to 4 percent above the optimum moisture content, to a depth of at least 12 inches. • Proper concrete curing techniques should be utilized to reduce the potential for slab curling or the formation of excessive shrinkage cracks. • Control joints should be provided at a maximum spacing of 8 feet on center in two directions for slabs and at 4 feet on center for sidewalks. Control joints are intended to direct cracking. Minor cracking and/or movement of exterior concrete slabs on grade should be expected. • Expansion or felt joints should be used at the interface of exterior slabs on grade and any fixed structures to permit relative movement. Thickened Edges Where the outer edges of concrete flatwork are to be bordered by landscaping, thickened edges should be used to prevent excessive infiltration and accumulation of water under the slabs. Thickened edges, if used, should be 6 to 8 inches wide, extend 12 inches below the tops of the finish slab surfaces, and be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom. Thickened edges are not mandatory; however, their inclusion in flatwork construction adjacent to landscaped areas will significantly reduce the potential for vertical and horizontal movement and subsequent cracking of the flatwork related to soil movement. SOL 1'HGRN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G133 -2 Page 9 6.8 Landscape Wall Construction Foundations Foundations for landscape walls should be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The footings should also be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom. Construction Joints In order to minimize the potential for unsightly cracking related to the effects of differential movements, construction joints should be provided in the walls at horizontal intervals of approximately 20± feet, and at each corner. The separations should be provided in the blocks and should not extend through the foundation. Foundations should be poured monolithically with continuous reinforcement along the entire length of the wall. A joint to provide positive separation between the wall face and adjacent flatwork is also recommended. A 1/2± inch thick felt joint may be used for this application. 6.9 Planters and Planter Walls Area drains should be extended into all planters that are located within 5 feet of building walls, foundations, retaining walls and landscape walls to minimize infiltration of water into the adjacent foundation soils. The surface of the ground in these areas should also be sloped at a minimum gradient of 2 percent away from the walls and foundations. A drip irrigation system is also recommended to prevent overwatering and subsequent saturation of the foundation walls. Planter walls should be supported by continuous concrete footings designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations presented for landscape walls. 6.10 Retaining Wall Design and Construction The site plan provided to our office does not indicate any retaining walls as part of the proposed development. However, in the event that retaining walls may be required, the following recommendations for retaining wall construction have been provided. It is assumed that in the event that retaining walls will be required, they will be limited in height to 5t feet. The parameters recommended for use in the design of retaining walls at the subject site are presented below: Retaining Wall Design Parameters Based on the soil conditions encountered at the boring locations, the following parameters may be used in the design of new retaining walls for this site. The following parameters assume that only the on-site soils will be utilized for retaining wall backfill. The near surface soils generally consist of silty fine sands and fine sandy silts. Based on their composition, the on-site soils have been assigned a friction angle of 30 degrees. SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. ISG136-2 GENECHNICAL Page 23 If desired, SCG could provide design parameters for an alternative select backfill material behind the retaining walls. The use of select backfill material could result in lower lateral earth pressures. In order to use the design parameters for the imported select fill, this material must be placed within the entire active failure wedge. This wedge is defined as extending from the heel of the retaining wall upwards at an angle of approximately 600 from horizontal. If select backfill material behind the retaining wall is desired, SCG should be contacted for supplementary recommendations. REMAINING WALL DESIGN PARAMETERS Regardless of the backfill type, the walls should be designed using a soil -footing coefficient of friction of 0.30 and an equivalent passive pressure of 300 lbs/ft3. The structural engineer should incorporate appropriate factors of safety in the design of the retaining walls. The active earth pressure may be used for the design of retaining walls that do not directly support structures or support soils that in turn support structures and which will be allowed to deflect. The at -rest earth pressure should be used for walls that will not be allowed to deflect such as those which will support foundation bearing soils, or which will support foundation loads directly. Where the soils on the toe side of the retaining wall are not covered by a "hard" surface such as a structure or pavement, the upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected when calculating passive resistance due to the potential for the material to become disturbed or degraded during the life of the structure. Retaining Wall Foundation Design The retaining wall foundations should be supported within newly placed compacted structural fill, extending to a depth of at least 2 feet below the proposed bearing grade. Foundations to support new retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the general Foundation Design Parameters presented in a previous section of this report. Backfill Material It is recommended that a prefabricated drainage composite such as the MiraDRAIN 6000XL (or approved equivalent), which is specifically designed for use behind retaining walls, be placed against the face of the retaining walls. The drainage composite should be installed in accordance SOL IHfRIN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 Page 24 GFOFFOINICAL Soil Type On -Site Silty to Clayey Design Parameter Sands Internal Friction Angle 300 Unit Weight 125 lbs/ft' Active Condition 42 lbs/ft' (level backfill Active Condition lbs/ft s Equivalent Fluid (2h: 1v backfill)67 At -Rest Condition 63 lbs/ft' Pressure: level backfill Regardless of the backfill type, the walls should be designed using a soil -footing coefficient of friction of 0.30 and an equivalent passive pressure of 300 lbs/ft3. The structural engineer should incorporate appropriate factors of safety in the design of the retaining walls. The active earth pressure may be used for the design of retaining walls that do not directly support structures or support soils that in turn support structures and which will be allowed to deflect. The at -rest earth pressure should be used for walls that will not be allowed to deflect such as those which will support foundation bearing soils, or which will support foundation loads directly. Where the soils on the toe side of the retaining wall are not covered by a "hard" surface such as a structure or pavement, the upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected when calculating passive resistance due to the potential for the material to become disturbed or degraded during the life of the structure. Retaining Wall Foundation Design The retaining wall foundations should be supported within newly placed compacted structural fill, extending to a depth of at least 2 feet below the proposed bearing grade. Foundations to support new retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the general Foundation Design Parameters presented in a previous section of this report. Backfill Material It is recommended that a prefabricated drainage composite such as the MiraDRAIN 6000XL (or approved equivalent), which is specifically designed for use behind retaining walls, be placed against the face of the retaining walls. The drainage composite should be installed in accordance SOL IHfRIN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 Page 24 GFOFFOINICAL with the manufacturer's specifications and extend from the top of the retaining wall footing to within 1 foot of the ground surface on the back side of the retaining wall. If the backfill soils are not covered by an impermeable surface, such as a structure or pavement, a 12 -inch thick layer of a low permeability soil should be placed over the backfill to reduce surface water migration to the underlying soils. All retaining wall backfill should be placed and compacted under engineering controlled conditions in the necessary layer thicknesses to ensure an in-place density between 90 and 93 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor test (ASTM D1557- 91). Care should be taken to avoid over -compaction of the soils behind the retaining walls, and the use of heavy compaction equipment should be avoided. Seismic Lateral Earth Pressures In accordance with the 2013 CBC, any walls retaining 6 or more feet (in height) of soil must be designed for seismic lateral earth pressures. If walls retaining 6 feet or more are required for this site, the geotechnical engineer should be contacted for supplementary seismic lateral earth pressure recommendations. Subsurface Drainage As previously indicated, the retaining wall design parameters are based upon drained backfill conditions. Consequently, some form of permanent drainage system will be necessary in conjunction with the appropriate backfill material. Subsurface drainage may consist of either: • A weep hole drainage system typically consisting of a series of 4 -inch diameter holes in the wall situated slightly above the ground surface elevation on the exposed side of the wall and at an approximate 8 -foot on -center spacing. The weep holes should include a 2 cubic foot pocket of open graded gravel, surrounded by an approved geotextile fabric, at each weep hole location. • A 4 -inch diameter perforated pipe surrounded by 2 cubic feet of gravel per linear foot of drain placed behind the wall, above the retaining wall footing. The gravel layer should be wrapped in a suitable geotextile fabric to reduce the potential for migration of fines. The footing drain should be extended to daylight or tied into a storm drainage system. 6.11 Pavement Design Parameters Site preparation in the pavement area should be completed as previously recommended in the Site Grading Recommendations section of this report. The subsequent pavement recommendations assume proper drainage and construction monitoring, and are based on either PCA or CALTPANS design parameters for a twenty (20) year design period. However, these designs also assume a routine pavement maintenance program to obtain the anticipated 20 -year pavement service life. SOtTURN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 156136-2 v( 4011 CHNICAL Page 25 Pavement Subgrades It is anticipated that the new pavements will be primarily supported on a layer of compacted structural fill, extending to at least 2 feet below subgrade. The near surface soils generally silty fine sands and clayey fine sands. These soils are considered to possess fair to good pavement support characteristics with estimated R -values of 30 to 40. Since R -value testing was not included in the scope of services for this project, the subsequent pavement design is based upon an assumed R -value of 30. Any fill material imported to the site should have support characteristics equal to or greater than that of the on-site soils and be placed and compacted under engineering controlled conditions. It is recommended that R -value testing be performed after completion of rough grading. Depending upon the results of the R -value testing, it may be feasible to use thinner pavement sections in some areas of the site. Asphaltic Concrete The recommended thicknesses for new flexible pavement structures consisting of asphaltic concrete over a granular base are presented below. The pavement designs are based on the traffic indices (TI's) indicated. The client and/or civil engineer should verify that these TI's are representative of the anticipated traffic volumes. If the client and/or civil engineer determine that the expected traffic volume will exceed the applicable traffic index, we should be contacted for supplementary recommendations. The design traffic indices equate to the following approximate daily traffic volumes over a 20 year design life, assuming six operational traffic days per week. Traffic Index No. of Heavy Trucks per Day 4.5 0 5.5 2 For the purpose of the traffic volumes indicated above, a truck is defined as a 5 -axle tractor trailer unit with one 8 -kip axle and two 32 -kip tandem axles. All of the traffic indices allow for 1,000 automobiles per day. ASPHALT PAVEMENTS (R = 30) Materials Thickness (inches) Interior cul-de-sacs TI = 4.5 Interior Collector Streets TI = 5.5 Asphalt Concrete 3 31/2 Aggregate Base 5 7 Compacted Subgrade 90% minimum com action 12 12 The aggregate base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. The asphaltic concrete should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Marshall maximum density, as determined by ASTM D-2726. The aggregate base course may consist of crushed aggregate base (CAB) or crushed miscellaneous base (CMB), which is a recycled gravel, asphalt and concrete material. The gradation, R -Value, Sand Equivalent, and SOLI HERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 Page 26 GAO1101MCAL Percentage Wear of the CAB or CMB should comply with appropriate specifications contained in the current edition of the "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Portland Cement Concrete The preparation of the subgrade soils within concrete pavement areas should be performed as previously described for proposed asphalt pavement areas. The minimum recommended thicknesses for the Portland Cement Concrete pavement sections are as follows: PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS Thickness (inches) Materials Interior cul-de-sacs Interior Collector Streets TI=4.5 (TI =5.5 PCC 5 51/2 Compacted Subgrade (95% minimum compaction) 12 12 The concrete should have a 28 -day compressive strength of at least 3,000 psi. Reinforcing within all pavements should consist of at least heavy welded wire mesh (6x6-W2.9xW2.9 WWF) placed at mid height in the slab. The maximum joint spacing within all of the PCC pavements is recommended to be equal to or less than 30 times the pavement thickness. The actual joint spacing and reinforcing of the Portland cement concrete pavements should be determined by the structural engineer. SOUTHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CILIIORNIA Project No. 156136-2 vCI01 ECIEMCAL Page 27 7.0 GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared as an instrument of service for use by the client, in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. This report may be provided to the contractor(s) and other design consultants to disclose information relative to the project. However, this report is not intended to be utilized as a specification in and of itself, without appropriate interpretation by the project architect, civil engineer, and/or structural engineer. The reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. Furthermore, any reliance on this report by an unauthorized third party is at such party's sole risk, and we accept no responsibility for damage or loss which may occur. The client(s)' reliance upon this report is subject to the Engineering Services Agreement, incorporated into our proposal for this project. The analysis of this site was based on a subsurface profile interpolated from limited discrete soil samples. While the materials encountered in the project area are considered to be representative of the total area, some variations should be expected between boring locations and sample depths. If the conditions encountered during construction vary significantly from those detailed herein, we should be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. This report has been based on assumed or provided characteristics of the proposed development. It is recommended that the owner, client, architect, structural engineer, and civil engineer carefully review these assumptions to ensure that they are consistent with the characteristics of the proposed development. If discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to verify that they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. We also recommend that the project plans and specifications be submitted to our office for review to verify that our recommendations have been correctly interpreted. The analysis, conclusions, and recommendations contained within this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practice. No other warranty is implied or expressed. SOL IHERN Proposed Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15GI36-2 Page 28 (FOIFCIINICAL 8.0 REFERENCES Geotechnical Investigation 336± Unit Residential Development Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore California, prepared for Classic Pacific, prepared by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCG), SCG Project No. 04G160-1, dated July 28, 2004. Fault Study, 336 Unit Residential Development Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore. California, prepared for Classic Pacific, prepared by SCG, SCG Project No. 04G160-3, dated August 17, 2004 Blake, Thomas F., FRISKSP, A Computer Program for the Probabilistic Estimation of Peak Acceleration and Uniform Hazard Spectra Using 3-D Faults as Earthquake Sources, Version 4.00, 2000. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), "Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California," State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 117A, 2008. Idriss, I. M. and Boulanger, R.W., "Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes", Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2008, National Research Council (NRC), "Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes," Committee on Earthquake Engineering, National Research Council, Washington D. C., Report No. CETS-EE-001, 1985. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., "Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential using field Performance Data," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, September 1971, pp. 1249-1273. Sadigh, K., Chang, C. —Y., Egan, J. A., Makdisi. F., Youngs, R. R., "Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data" Seismological Research Letters, Seismological Society of America, Volume 68, Number 1, January/ February 1997, pp. 180-189. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), University of Southern California, "Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California," Committee formed 1997. Tokimatsu K., and Seed, H. B., "Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American society of Civil Engineers, Volume 113, No. 8, August 1987, pp. 861-878. Tokimatsu, K. and Yoshimi, Y., "Empirical Correlations of Soil Liquefaction Based on SPT N -value and Fines Content, "Seismological Research Letters Eastern Section Seismological Society Of America, Volume 63, Number 1, p. 73. Youd, T. L. and Idriss, I. M. (Editors), "Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils," Salt Lake City, UT, January 5-6 1996, NCEER Technical Report NCEER-97-0022, Buffalo, NY. SOC IIIERN Proposed Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136-2 (LOILCHNICAL Page 29 Z02-1411 ? � ��3�W 26�1����yy � '10 , e,�F', P -- 3 f f, p A1111 �\ , � El fn r rev lionat Forest, r a r� s "� I " `}� m� °J A V•r�i r 11 o cn Id'i 4 14IV���'� s `£ i T5S - — - — T6S / U _ roar gdl Caen, P � s 8, t��.g4,rp� �s� yr e � P _ }^ y n r "teaa i `JI p4 q -r3 S J eft f n O n V !, mr 6, ... ClevelandtANC ! National ForQst�,� SWO q e o 11 10 Cie send National Forest 17 16 / - 15 SITE LOCATION MAP PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA SOURCE RIVERSIDE 2013COUSCALE. 1"-2400' SOUTHERN THOMAS GUIDE. 2013 �?� DRAWN'. JL L IU CHKO' JAS �r S��pROJE�.. CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL PLATE 1 a,— _ aw p 0 I � 0�U x =za woo =oa :? a o s w i Ij� n R �'jILI�LJ�`�.1 i � a j i I av w7f e CEl X41 HT�U��' ' f c FIR I j a 4 I p�I O j :., .1 I ID 0 O Qm �m �O o o j11 zo o 0 O zz �, f �l , �, —� ICL W 00- 0 W Q mW ! w x sir �� ��.-> __ _I_� _ __ i z a it U w U U a a�n a`n i -InN9AV w r CD BORING LOG LEGEND SAMPLE TYPE GRAPHICAL SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SYMBOL AUGER SAMPLE COLLECTED FROM AUGER CUTTINGS, NO FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SOIL STRENGTII, (DISTURBED) ROCK CORE SAMPLE: TYPICALLY TAKEN WITH A CORE DIAMOND TIPPED CORE BARREL. TYPICALLY USED ONLY IN HIGHLY CONSOLIDATED BEDROCK. {�M� SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN WITH NO SPECIALIZED GRAB N�""( EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS FROM A STOCKPILE OR THE GROUND SURFACE. (DISTURBED) CALIFORNIA SAMPLER: 2-1/2 INCH I.D. SPLIT BARREL CS SAMPLER, LINED WITH 1 -INCH HIGH BRASS RINGS. DRIVEN WITH SPT HAMMER. (RELATIVELY UNDISTURBED) NO RECOVERY: THE SAMPLING ATTEMPT DID NOT NSR O RESULT IN RECOVERY OF ANY SIGNIFICANT SOIL OR ROCK MATERIAL. STANDARD PENETRATION TEST: SAMPLER IS A 1.4 SPT INCH INSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT BARREL, DRIVEN 18 INCHES WITH THE SPTHAMMER. (DISTURBED) SHELBY TUBE: TAKEN WITH A THIN WALL SAMPLE SH TUBE, PUSHED INTO THE SOIL AND THEN EXTRA ED. (UNDISTURBED) VANE SHEAR TEST: SOIL STRENGTH OBTAINED USING VANE A 4 BLADED SHEAR DEVICE. TYPICALLY USED IN SOFT CLAYS -NO SAMPLE RECOVERED. COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS DEPTH: Distance in feet below the ground surface. SAMPLE: Sample Type as depicted above. BLOW COUNT: Number of blows required to advance the sampler 12 inches using a 140 Ib hammer with a 30 -inch drop. 50/3" indicates penetration refusal (>50 blows) at 3 inches. WH indicates that the weight of the hammer was sufficient to push the sampler 6 inches or more. POCKET PEN.: Approximate shear strength of a cohesive soil sample as measured by pocket penetrometer. GRAPHIC LOG: DRY DENSITY: MOISTURE CONTENT LIQUID LIMIT: PLASTIC LIMIT: PASSING #200 SIEVE: UNCONFINED SHEAR: Graphic Soil Symbol as depicted on the following page. Dry density of an undisturbed or relatively undisturbed sample in lbs/ft'. Moisture content of a soil sample, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight. The moisture content above which a soil behaves as a liquid. The moisture content above which a soil behaves as a plastic. The percentage of the sample finer than the #200 standard sieve. The shear strength of a cohesive soil sample, as measured in the unconfined state. SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS �'� 0 1B.0 In GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELLY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) o DOo 0 O C) 0o C) GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORETHAN AR5E0/ GRAVELS WITH FINES °� `D o o ° o GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - SILT MIXTURES FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE AMOUNT (APPRECIABLE OF LES Cj L' CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SAND AND CLEAN SANDS SW WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES LARGER THAN SANDY NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITHSILTY FINES `SM SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO, 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLECLAYEY AMOUNT OF FINES) SC SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO FINE GRAINED SOILS AND LESSITHAN150 CLAYS CL CLAYS, A DSY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS — — — — OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN S OF MATERIALL I SMALLER THANN NO. 200 SIEVE MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY GH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS -- -- — PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TW GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-16 JOB NO.: 15G136 DRILLING DATE: 3/30/15 WATER DEPTH: 34 feet PROJECT: Sunwood TR # 33267 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 43 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: At Completion FIELD RESULTS O _ = Q of 0 DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL RESULTS m z W o v W LL w W a Z o O ° Z a w Uu. 0 >>LABORATORY 4- z Wr, YLL x� o a o �� Z FW M o0 2 C p DH 0� 7 71 U vlh a 0- O W zm mo a� a. u Ow LL ? LL ZK O¢ Z D m ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown fine Sandy Silt, trace calcareous 14 veining, medium dense -damp 9 15 11 5 13 3.0 Dark Gray Brown Clayey Silt, some fine Sand, trace calcareous veining, stiff -moist 17 27 22 13 2.0 18 73 10 Gray Brown fine Sandy Silt, medium dense -damp 11 13 67 15 3.0 19 34 15 70 - Dark Gray Brown fine Sandy Clay, some Silt, trace calcareous veining, stiff -moist Gray Brown Silty fine Sand, trace calcareous veining, medium dense -damp to moist 18 20 26 20 19 7 19 25 Brown fine to medium Sand, dense -damp 36 5 30 --- Gray Silty fine Sand to fine Sandy Silt, medium dense -wet 22 - 18 49 TEST BORING LOG PLATE B -16a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-16 JOB NO.: 15G136 DRILLING DATE: 3/30/15 WATER DEPTH: 34 feet PROJECT: Sunwood TR # 33267 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 43 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: At Completion FIELD RESULTS LABORATORY RESULTS w a DESCRIPTION u w zm _ O W S w cu z DW U O W Zm a: w a O UN a �'z z� ~ mH z� to o va m a°� (Continued) >� oa 2t° a� vcnio a ow nm =J =1 Gray Silty fine Sand to fine Sandy Silt, medium dense -wet Gray Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense to dense -wet 42 21 40— - x 30 15 12 45 ark Gray Silly fine Sand, medium clenseWde—nse-wet 17 26 Brown fine to medium Sand, some Silt, medium dense -wet 9 18 10 Dark Gray Silly fine Sand, medium dense -wet 22 32 Boring Terminated at 50' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B -16b SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-17 JOB NO.'. 15G136 DRILLING DATE: 3/30/15 WATER DEPTH: 12 feet PROJECT: Sunwood TR # 33267 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 40 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kos READING TAKEN: Al Completion FIELD RESULTS O DESCRIPTION LABORo ATORYd RESULTS S (� W Z aW 0u. z LL Um z UJ w LL z z w do S �z C QWLL Q uJ 0 o aa u w FILL: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand to fine Sandy Sill, -- 5416" dense -damp 86 9 E1=4@Ota 5' ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand, trace medium Sand, 13 loose to medium dense -damp 107 5 5 15 103 10 20 116 7 Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense -damp 20 108 9 10 Gray Brown Silly tine Sand, medium dense -very moist 6 15 25 15 — 77 Gray Clayey fine Sand, medium dense -wet 12 1.5 16 25 20 Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, Iron oxide staining, medium dense -wet 21 20 19 25 3.25. 19 47 _ Gray Brown Clayey fine Sand to fine Sandy Clay, some Silt, abundant Iron oxide staining, medium dense -wet 15 3.5 - 15 32 14 51 30 - Gray Silty fine to medium Sand, Iron oxide staining, dense -very moist 43 16 15 TEST BORING LOG PLATE B -17a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA �. GEO`PECHNICAL BORING NO. B-17 JOB NO.: 15G136 DRILLING DATE: 3/30/15 WATER DEPTH: 12 feet PROJECT: Sunwood TR # 33267 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 40 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: At Completion FIELD RESULTS DESCRIPTIONo LABORATORY RESULTS NN O w. ¢ 723 LO f — o W 20 (Continued) oa�° Gray Silty fine to medium Sand, Iron oxide staining, dense -very moist Gray Brawn fine Sandy Silt, Iron oxide staining, dense -very moist 59 19 40—X Gray Brown Silly fine to medium Sand, dense -very moist 56 14 45 - 13 Brown Silty fine Sand, dense -very moist 73 13 Boring Terminated at 50' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B -17b Classification: FILL: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand to fine Sandy Silt Boring Number: B-17 Initial Moisture Content (%) 9 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 15 Depth (ft) 1 to 2 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 87.3 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 113.7 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 7.11 Sunwood TR # 33267 °'�"`° @�' °"`" SOUTHERN Lake Elsinore, California CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136 �. GEOTECHNICAL PLATE C- 1 - Consolidation/Collapse Test Results 0 ___ .. __ –_ r'--- Final Moisture Content (%) 14 epth (ft) 3 to 4 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 107.3 pecimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 115.5 pecimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.99 �— a Water Added 2 — "' i — et 1600 psf _ 4 _-- ��-� --- - 1 s i 8 I ;; j 1 10 N I i I -100 12 o t i i 14 10 I I � _ 20 _. I i I 22 0.1 10 100 Load (ksf) Classification: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand, trace medium Sand oring Number: B-17 Initial Moisture Content (%) 5 ample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 14 epth (ft) 3 to 4 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 107.3 pecimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 115.5 pecimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.99 Sunwood Project No. R G136 7 '�"i' SOUTHERN Lake Elsinore, California CALIFORNIA 1 GEOTECHNICAL PLATE C- 2 Classification: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand, trace medium Sand Boring Number: B-17 Initial Moisture Content (%) 10 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 16 Depth (ft) 5 to 6 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 102.1 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 111.9 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.98 67 Project No. r 5G136vee a y4 SOUTHERNLake Elsinore, California CALIFORNIA I PLATE C- 3 GEOTECHNICAL �' Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Classification: Gray Brown Silty fine Sand, trace medium Sand ng Number: B-17 Initial Moisture Content (%) 7 iple Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 14 th (ft) 7 to 8 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 115.5 cimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 119.0 cimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.44 Sunwood TR # 33267 SOUTHERN Lake Elsinore, California CALIFORNIA Project No. 15G136 GEOTECHNICAL PLATE C- 4 �` Grading Guide Specifications GRADING GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS Page 1 These grading guide specifications are intended to provide typical procedures for grading operations. They are intended to supplement the recommendations contained in the geotechnical investigation report for this project. Should the recommendations in the geotechnical investigation report conflict with the grading guide specifications, the more site specific recommendations in the geotechnical investigation report will govern. General • The Earthwork Contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the plans and geotechnical reports, and in accordance with city, county, and applicable building codes. • The Geotechnical Engineer is the representative of the Owner/Builder for the purpose of implementing the report recommendations and guidelines. These duties are not intended to relieve the Earthwork Contractor of any responsibility to perform in a workman -like manner, nor is the Geotechnical Engineer to direct the grading equipment or personnel employed by the Contractor. • The Earthwork Contractor is required to notify the Geotechnical Engineer of the anticipated work and schedule so that testing and inspections can be provided. If necessary, work may be stopped and redone if personnel have not been scheduled in advance. • The Earthwork Contractor is required to have suitable and sufficient equipment on the job - site to process, moisture condition, mix and compact the amount of fill being placed to the approved compaction. In addition, suitable support equipment should be available to conform with recommendations and guidelines in this report. • Canyon cleanouts, overexcavation areas, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations, subdrains and benches should be observed by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of any fill. It is the Earthwork Contractor's responsibility to notify the Geotechnical Engineer of areas that are ready for inspection. • Excavation, filling, and subgrade preparation should be performed in a manner and sequence that will provide drainage at all times and proper control of erosion. Precipitation, springs, and seepage water encountered shall be pumped or drained to provide a suitable working surface. The Geotechnical Engineer must be informed of springs or water seepage encountered during grading or foundation construction for possible revision to the recommended construction procedures and/or installation of subdrains. Site Preparation The Earthwork Contractor is responsible for all clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer. • If any materials or areas are encountered by the Earthwork Contractor which are suspected of having toxic or environmentally sensitive contamination, the Geotechnical Engineer and Owner/Builder should be notified immediately. Grading Guide Specifications Page 2 • Major vegetation should be stripped and disposed of off-site. This includes trees, brush, heavy grasses and any materials considered unsuitable by the Geotechnical Engineer. • Underground structures such as basements, cesspools or septic disposal systems, mining shafts, tunnels, wells and pipelines should be removed under the inspection of the Geotechnical Engineer and recommendations provided by the Geotechnical Engineer and/or city, county or state agencies. If such structures are known or found, the Geotechnical Engineer should be notified as soon as possible so that recommendations can be formulated. • Any topsoil, slopewash, colluvium, alluvium and rock materials which are considered unsuitable by the Geotechnical Engineer should be removed prior to fill placement. • Remaining voids created during site clearing caused by removal of trees, foundations basements, irrigation facilities, etc., should be excavated and filled with compacted fill. • Subsequent to clearing and removals, areas to receive fill should be scarified to a depth of 10 to 12 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted • The moisture condition of the processed ground should be at or slightly above the optimum moisture content as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. Depending upon field conditions, this may require air drying or watering together with mixing and/or discing. Compacted Fills Soil materials imported to or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill, provided each material has been determined to be suitable in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer. Unless otherwise approved by the Geotechnical Engineer, all fill materials shall be free of deleterious, organic, or frozen matter, shall contain no chemicals that may result in the material being classified as "contaminated," and shall be very low to non -expansive with a maximum expansion index (EI) of 50. The top 12 inches of the compacted fill should have a maximum particle size of 3 inches, and all underlying compacted fill material a maximum 6 -inch particle size, except as noted below. • All soils should be evaluated and tested by the Geotechnical Engineer. Materials with high expansion potential, low strength, poor gradation or containing organic materials may require removal from the site or selective placement and/or mixing to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer. • Rock fragments or rocks less than 6 inches in their largest dimensions, or as otherwise determined by the Geotechnical Engineer, may be used in compacted fill, provided the distribution and placement is satisfactory in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer. • Rock fragments or rocks greater than 12 inches should be taken off-site or placed in accordance with recommendations and in areas designated as suitable by the Geotechnical Engineer. These materials should be placed in accordance with Plate D-8 of these Grading Guide Specifications and in accordance with the following recommendations: • Rocks 12 inches or more in diameter should be placed in rows at least 15 feet apart, 15 feet from the edge of the fill, and 10 feet or more below subgrade. Spaces should be left between each rock fragment to provide for placement and compaction of soil around the fragments. • Fill materials consisting of soil meeting the minimum moisture content requirements and free of oversize material should be placed between and over the rows of rock or Grading Guide Specifications Page 3 concrete. Ample water and compactive effort should be applied to the fill materials as they are placed in order that all of the voids between each of the fragments are filled and compacted to the specified density. • Subsequent rows of rocks should be placed such that they are not directly above a row placed in the previous lift of fill. A minimum 5 -foot offset between rows is recommended. • To facilitate future trenching, oversized material should not be placed within the range of foundation excavations, future utilities or other underground construction unless specifically approved by the soil engineer and the developer/owner representative. Fill materials approved by the Geotechnical Engineer should be placed in areas previously prepared to receive fill and in evenly placed, near horizontal layers at about 6 to 8 inches in loose thickness, or as otherwise determined by the Geotechnical Engineer for the project. • Each layer should be moisture conditioned to optimum moisture content, or slightly above, as directed by the Geotechnical Engineer. After proper mixing and/or drying, to evenly distribute the moisture, the layers should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in compliance with ASTM D-1557-78 unless otherwise indicated. • Density and moisture content testing should be performed by the Geotechnical Engineer at random intervals and locations as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. These tests are intended as an aid to the Earthwork Contractor, so he can evaluate his workmanship, equipment effectiveness and site conditions. The Earthwork Contractor is responsible for compaction as required by the Geotechnical Report(s) and governmental agencies. • Fill areas unused for a period of time may require moisture conditioning, processing and recompaction prior to the start of additional filling. The Earthwork Contractor should notify the Geotechnical Engineer of his intent so that an evaluation can be made. • Fill placed on ground sloping at a 5 -to -1 inclination (horizontal -to -vertical) or steeper should be benched into bedrock or other suitable materials, as directed by the Geotechnical Engineer. Typical details of benching are illustrated on Plates D-2, D-4, and D-5. • Cut/fill transition lots should have the cut portion overexcavated to a depth of at least 3 feet and rebuilt with fill (see Plate D-1), as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. • All cut lots should be inspected by the Geotechnical Engineer for fracturing and other bedrock conditions. If necessary, the pads should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and rebuilt with a uniform, more cohesive soil type to impede moisture penetration. • Cut portions of pad areas above buttresses or stabilizations should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and rebuilt with uniform, more cohesive compacted fill to impede moisture penetration. • Non-structural fill adjacent to structural fill should typically be placed in unison to provide lateral support. Backfill along walls must be placed and compacted with care to ensure that excessive unbalanced lateral pressures do not develop. The type of fill material placed adjacent to below grade walls must be properly tested and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer with consideration of the lateral earth pressure used in the design. Grading Guide Specifications Foundations Fill Slopes Page 4 The foundation influence zone is defined as extending one foot horizontally from the outside edge of a footing, and proceeding downward at a 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical (0.5:1) inclination. Where overexcavation beneath a footing subgrade is necessary, it should be conducted so as to encompass the entire foundation influence zone, as described above. Compacted fill adjacent to exterior footings should extend at least 12 inches above foundation bearing grade. Compacted fill within the interior of structures should extend to the floor subgrade elevation. The placement and compaction of fill described above applies to all fill slopes. Slope compaction should be accomplished by overfilling the slope, adequately compacting the fill in even layers, including the overfilled zone and cutting the slope back to expose the compacted core Slope compaction may also be achieved by backrolling the slope adequately every 2 to 4 vertical feet during the filling process as well as requiring the earth moving and compaction equipment to work close to the top of the slope. Upon completion of slope construction, the slope face should be compacted with a sheepsfoot connected to a sideboom and then grid rolled. This method of slope compaction should only be used if approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. • Sandy soils lacking in adequate cohesion may be unstable for a finished slope condition and therefore should not be placed within 15 horizontal feet of the slope face. • All fill slopes should be keyed into bedrock or other suitable material. Fill keys should beat least 15 feet wide and inclined at 2 percent into the slope. For slopes higher than 30 feet, the fill key width should be equal to one-half the height of the slope (see Plate D-5). • All fill keys should be cleared of loose slough material prior to geotechnical inspection and should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and governmental agencies prior to filling. • The cut portion of fill over cut slopes should be made first and inspected by the Geotechnical Engineer for possible stabilization requirements. The fill portion should be adequately keyed through all surficial soils and into bedrock or suitable material. Soils should be removed from the transition zone between the cut and fill portions (see Plate D- 2). Cut Slopes • All cut slopes should be inspected by the Geotechnical Engineer to determine the need for stabilization. The Earthwork Contractor should notify the Geotechnical Engineer when slope cutting is in progress at intervals of 10 vertical feet. Failure to notify may result in a delay in recommendations. Cut slopes exposing loose, cohesionless sands should be reported to the Geotechnical Engineer for possible stabilization recommendations. • All stabilization excavations should be cleared of loose slough material prior to geotechnical inspection. Stakes should be provided by the Civil Engineer to verify the location and dimensions of the key. A typical stabilization fill detail is shown on Plate D-5. Grading Guide Specifications Subdrains Page 5 Stabilization key excavations should be provided with subdrains. Typical subdrain details are shown on Plates D-6. • Subdrains may be required in canyons and swales where fill placement is proposed. Typical subdrain details for canyons are shown on Plate D-3. Subdrains should be installed after approval of removals and before filling, as determined by the Soils Engineer. • Plastic pipe may be used for subdrains provided it is Schedule 40 or SDR 35 or equivalent. Pipe should be protected against breakage, typically by placement in a square -cut (backhoe) trench or as recommended by the manufacturer. • Filter material for subdrams should conform to CALTRANS Specification 68-1.025 or as approved by the Geotechnical Engineer for the specific site conditions. Clean 3/4 -inch crushed rock may be used provided it is wrapped in an acceptable filter cloth and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. Pipe diameters should be 6 inches for runs up to 500 feet and 8 inches for the downstream continuations of longer runs. Four -inch diameter pipe may be used in buttress and stabilization fills. CUT LOT NATURAE G= � COMPACTED FILL J }f OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT COMPETENT MATERIAL, AS APPROVED __--jBY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CUT/FILL LOT (TRANSITION) NP�VG/ *SEE TEXT OF REPORT FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION. ACTUAL DEPTH OF OVEREXCAVATION MAY BE GREATER. 55''MIIN..\py.L _j1]1�1�V 3' MIN.*. OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT DEEPER OVEREXCAVATION MAYBE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER IN STEEP TRANSITIONS NEW COMPACTED FILL COMPETENT MATERIAL CUT/FILL CONTACT SHOWN CUT/FILL CONTACT TO BE ON GRADING PLAN SHOWN ON "AS -BUILT" 9' MIN. /g`�MATERIAU UNSUtTR NATURAL GRADE RrMOVE i 10' TY,P 4' TYP. BENCHING DIMENSIONS IN ACCORDANCE CUT SLOPE WITH PLAN OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MINIMUM 1' TILT BACK OR 2% SLOPE (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) BEDROCK OR APPROVED CUT SLOPE TO BE CONSTRUCTED COMPETENT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL KEYWAY IN COMPETENT MATERIAL MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. KEYWAY MAY NOT BE REQUIRED IF FILL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 5 FEET IN HEIGHT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. b MIN. FIRM NATIVE SOIL/BEDROCK 18" MIN. 18" MIN, 24" MIN. MINUS 1" CRUSHED ROCK COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY FILTER FABRIC, OR CLASS II PERMEABLE MATERIAL 4" MIN. 6" DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE - MINIMUM 1% SLOPE PIPE DEPTH OF FILL MATERIAL OVER SUBDRAIN ADS (CORRUGATED POLETHYLENE) 8 TRANSITE UNDERDRAIN 20 PVC OR ABS: SDR 35 35 SDR 21 100 SCHEMATIC ONLY NOT TO SCALE FINISHED SLOPE FACE NEW COMPACTED FILL OVERFILL REQUIREMENTS PER GRADING GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS COMPETENT MATERIAL TOE OF SLOPE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN PROJECT SLOPE GRADIENT - (11 MAX.) PLACE COMPACTED BACKFILL TO ORIGINAL GRADE BACKCUF-VARIES 4'TYP. / /1ERIA� 10' TYP fi 1 OVE �N501TAELE MP � . / 7 BENCHING DIMENSIONS IN ACCORDANCE / T WITH PLAN OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MINIMUM 1' TILT BACK 2' MINIMUM OR 2% SLOPE KEY DEPTH f (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) KEYWAY IN COMPETENT MATERIAL, MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNIAL ENGINEER. KEYWAY MAY NOT BE REQUIRED IF FILL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 5' IN HEIGHT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. NOTE: BENCHING SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN NATURAL SLOPES ARE EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 5:1 OR WHEN RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. COMPETENT MATERIAL ACCEPTABLE TO THE SOIL ENGINEER COMPACTED FILL FACE OF FINISHED SLOPE 2' MINIMUM J KEY DEPTH KEYWAY WIDTH, AS SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER / 4' TYP. TI YPICAL BLANKET FILL IF RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TOP WIDTH OF FILL AS SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BENCHING DIMENSIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MINIMUM 1' TILT BACK OR 2% SLOPE (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) DESIGN FINISH SLOPE OUTLETS TO BE SPACED AT 100' MAXIMUM INTERVALS. EXTEND 12 INCHES BLANKET FILL IF RECOMMENDED BEYOND FACE OF SLOPE BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AT TIME OF ROUGH GRADING CONSTRUCTION. BUTTRESS OR SIDEHILL FILL AN — — 25'.X, T a 1v MAX. .. I � � DETAIL "A" 4 -INCH DIAMETER NON -PERFORATED mir OUTLET PIPE TO BE LOCATED IN FIELD BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. 2' CLEAR "FILTER MATERIAL" TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT: (CONFORMS TO EMA STD. PLAN 323) SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1" 100 3/4" 90-100 3/8" 40-100 NO.4 25-40 NO.8 18-33 NO. 30 5-15 NO. 50 0-7 NO. 200 0-3 "GRAVEL" TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT: OUTLET PIPE TO BE CON- FILTER MATERIAL - MINIMUM OF FIVE NECTED TO SUBDRAIN PIPE CUBIC FEET PER FOOT OF PIPE. SEE WITH TEE OR ELBOW ABOVE FOR FILTER MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. ALTERNATIVE: IN LIEU OF FILTER MATERIAL FIVE CUBIC FEET OF GRAVEL PER FOOT OF PIPE MAY BE ENCASED _ IN FILTER FABRIC, SEE ABOVE FOR GRAVEL SPECIFICATION. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 140 O OR EQUIVALENT. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES ON ALL JOINTS. `— MINIMUM 4 -INCH DIAMETER PVC SCH 40 OR ABS CLASS SDR 35 WITH A CRUSHING STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 1,000 POUNDS, WITH A MINIMUM DETAIL "A" OF 8 UNIFORMLY SPACED PERFORATIONS PER FOOT OF PIPE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS ON BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE CAP AT UPSTREAM END OF PIPE. SLOPE AT 2 PERCENT TO OUTLET PIPE, NOTES: 1. TRENCH FOR OUTLET PIPES TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ON-SITE SOIL. MAXIMUM SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1 1/2" 100 NO. 4 50 NO. 200 8 SAND EQUIVALENT = MINIMUM OF 50 OUTLET PIPE TO BE CON- FILTER MATERIAL - MINIMUM OF FIVE NECTED TO SUBDRAIN PIPE CUBIC FEET PER FOOT OF PIPE. SEE WITH TEE OR ELBOW ABOVE FOR FILTER MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. ALTERNATIVE: IN LIEU OF FILTER MATERIAL FIVE CUBIC FEET OF GRAVEL PER FOOT OF PIPE MAY BE ENCASED _ IN FILTER FABRIC, SEE ABOVE FOR GRAVEL SPECIFICATION. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 140 O OR EQUIVALENT. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES ON ALL JOINTS. `— MINIMUM 4 -INCH DIAMETER PVC SCH 40 OR ABS CLASS SDR 35 WITH A CRUSHING STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 1,000 POUNDS, WITH A MINIMUM DETAIL "A" OF 8 UNIFORMLY SPACED PERFORATIONS PER FOOT OF PIPE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS ON BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE CAP AT UPSTREAM END OF PIPE. SLOPE AT 2 PERCENT TO OUTLET PIPE, NOTES: 1. TRENCH FOR OUTLET PIPES TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ON-SITE SOIL. MINIMUM ONE FOOT THICK LAYER OF LOW PERMEABLILITY SOIL IF NOT COVERED WITH AN IMPERMEABLE SU MINIMUM ONE FOOT WIDE LAYER OF FREE DRAINING MATERIAL (LESS THAN 5% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE) OR PROPERLY INSTALLED PREFABRICATED DRAINAGE COMPOSITE (Mira DRAIN 6000 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). FILTER MATERIAL - MINIMUM OF TWO CUBIC FEET PER FOOT OF PIPE. SEE BELOW FOR FILTER MATERIAL SPECIFICATION ALTERNATIVE: IN LIEU OF FILTER MATERIAL TWO CUBIC FEET OF GRAVEL PER FOOT OF PIPE MAY BE ENCASED IN FILTER FABRIC. SEE BELOW FOR GRAVEL SPECIFICATION. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 140 OR EQUIVALENT. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES ON ALL JOINTS. MINIMUM 4 -INCH DIAMETER PVC SCH 40 OR ABS CLASS SDR 35 WITH A CRUSHING STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 1,000 POUNDS, WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 UNIFORMLY SPACED PERFORATIONS PER FOOT OF PIPE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS ON BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE CAP AT UPSTREAM END OF PIPE. SLOPE AT 2 PERCENT TO OUTLET PIPE. "FILTER MATERIAL" TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT: (CONFORMS TO EMA STD. PLAN 323) SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1" 100 3/4" 90-100 318" 40-100 NO.4 25-40 NO. 8 18-33 NO, 30 5-15 NO, 50 0-7 NO. 200 0-3 "GRAVEL" TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT: MAXIMUM SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1 112' 100 NO. 4 50 NO. 200 8 SAND EQUIVALENT = MINIMUM OF 50 TypicalRowof Oversize p Rock Fragments Fill Slope - L� �5FEET MINIMUM - OFFSET—� 15 FEET MINIMUM--�� Typical Row of Oversize _- Rock Fragments Section View 10 FEET (MINIMUM 1.5 FEET MINIMUM 1 O 3 FEET MINIMUM "W'o )CT00O 0w��mO 15 FEET MINIMUM - I Plan View PLACEMENT OF OVERSIZED MATERIAL GRADING GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS OT TO NRAWN DRAWN: PMM SOUTHERN +Y CHK:: clan �' CALIFORNIA .� GEOTECHNICAL PLATE D-8 MtJSGS Design Maps Summary Report User -Specified Input Building Code Reference Document ASCE 7-10 Standard (which utilizes )S(,S hez„rd data avaitahle in Milt) Site Coordinates 33.666140N, 117.38464°W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil' Risk Category I/II/III 560011; I �� Ft z` u i 1 1 ' Can I %asy aim.. rynn wnwc.+ I lake USGS-Provided Output S5 = 2.295 g SA,S = 2.295 g SPs = 1.530 g S, = 0.923 g SM, = 1.384 g So, = 0.923 g For information on how the 55 and 51 values above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk -targeted) and deterministic ground motions in the direction of maximum horizontal response, please return to the application and select the "2009 NEHRP" building code reference document. 2.ao 2.m 1.94 1. f,1 P 1.35 H 1.15 0.92 0.G9 0.66 9.2# MCEn Response Spectrum 0 30 0.40 0.90 0.80 1.00 1.20 Period, T (sec) Design Response Spectrum l.aa 1.29 1.12 P 0.96 to n.20 0.61 0,40 0.31 0.16 -1 0.00 L90 200 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.90 1.00 126 1,40 1.60 1.90 Z.00 Period. T (sec) For PGA,,, Tl, C„t, and C,,, values, please view Phe detailed reodrt. SOURCE. U S. GEOLOGICAL S11R111(111;8) <❑ppageohazertlausgs.govl0esignmaps/uslappllcali0n. php> l�} G Section 11.8.3 - Additional Geotechnical Investigation Report Requirements for Seismic Design Categories D through F From Figure -22-703 PGA = 0.914 Equation (11.8-1): PGA, = F11APGA = 1.000 x 0.914 = 0.914 g Table 11.8- 1: Site Coefficient Ft,,, Site Mapped MCE Geometric Mean Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA Class PGA 5 0.10 PGA = 0.20 PGA = 0.30 PGA = 0.40 PGA >_ 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.o 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1..0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA For Site Class = D and PGA = 0.914 g, FncA = 1.000 Section 21.2.1.1 - Method 1 (from Chapter 21 - Site -Specific Ground Motion Procedures for Seismic Design) From figure 22-17tsl Ctts = 0.911 From lure 22-18 [c] CR, = 0.900 SOURCE. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (USGS) <hltp'1lgeohazai ds.usgs.goWdesignmapsluslapplloatlon nip> �I Eff. Overburden N Q N N. N Z v N M v N `m m o n a v m 4 � r Stress Reduction _ o m m `° w O a - in- w 2 ri m -6 o r v N N w,o N o - iT Coefficient (r°) /� N 0 N N N N N m 0 0 0 r 0 r 0 0 Eff. Overburden E p U U v m o v o o 0 m U 0 U EL N ZO N M 4 am Stress (Hist. Water) J J J J 3 3 N N N N N M M 3 F C O (a^) (PS'Fl) U > J J O O J O O O O O J J N N r Ln a m N �, N Z Z ON U m Z 2 2 Z Z rri N cv vri M a 4 u> ,Nr, vri In m m @ Factor of Safety ZH Z U0 75 0 U (D a Q 5 7 (N 1)GOCS Cyclic Stress RatioInduced n m N N N N N N 4 M o M V h r M (O M N 4 M 4 N N Q E G `O C S O N m b Desi n Y 9 z Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Earthquake 0 = m (N1 )60 m v o m ui m io v vi M Cyclic Resistance �, ¢_ ¢_ n �, ¢ r4v N o o S o o cry v t0 4 Ratio (M=B 97) N Z Z O Le Z 0 O N N N N N O O Cyclic Resistance ¢_ ¢_ - N¢ Correction m. 0 o m o 00 o ti c 0 Ratio (M-7,6) / Z Z p O Z O N N N N O O 5 Ks nl O O O 0 O O O O O O O C` B o 0 0 Energy Correction MSF N E N N N N N to Eff. Overburden N Q N N. N Z v N M v N `m m o n a v m 4 � r Stress Reduction _ o m m `° w w - in- w m ri m -6 o r v p w,o m o E (pen Coefficient (r°) m o 0 m 0 d m 0 M 0 m 0 0 0 r 0 r 0 0 Eff. Overburden E p U U v m o v o o w m U Eff. Overburden N Q N N. N Z v N M v N `m m o n � m v . r 4 � r vm o m c E E r Stress (Curr. Water) o ° w - in- m m ri m -6 o v n m o E (pen U w U o v Z p U C Eff. Overburden E p U U v m o v o o w m U 0 U z z N ZO N M 4 am Stress (Hist. Water) N N N N N M M 3 F C O (a^) (PS'Fl) Overburden Stress r lrl m In m N N r Ln N l` N N �, N In Nm m ON U m p d (ac) (pso r rri N cv vri M a 4 u> ,Nr, vri In m m @ U0 75 0 U (D a Q 5 7 (N 1)GOCS r n m N N N N N N 4 M o M V h r M (O M N 4 M 4 N N Q E G C S O N m N !U m (JD 0 = m (N1 )60 m v o m ui m io v vi M M ry ai O O O L L N N N N t0 4 4 N N Rod Length N Le 0 m m m m m U2 'w o$ m G_0 m Correction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ce 5 nl O O O O O O O O O O O C` B Energy Correction E to 0 m > Fines Content M n r o �o m m N co o N m ' C Unit Weight of Sal N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z a (Pcf) Uncorrected m O N m SPT.N-Value M N 4 M M -iMo W M Q 0 r Z ba Depth to Midpoint m w ri W D_ J N O 0] (ft) N m O N Dept�l tO.DettOm Of r V' I` N N M M V 4 V V In .0 F E U Z_u Z LL z W v 16 6 Ce O N UJ UJ .0 CN N N N m o `Sample Oepth (fl); o r m v V1 6 m c of v os v v m of J (L 0- d W m -j N 4 m N Q m m m m w o m m o _ Z N W N C 9 v N `m a m � m v " o � r `w Em£ o m c E E r o ° w - in- -6 o a N E U w U o v Z p U C N w E p U U v U v o o w m U 0 U z z N ZO N M 4 N 0 J F Z CW G W F F- LU W 0 W z Z Z 0 F a w W O J i M a 0 0 v a c m v v � O1 N N w � 0 m 0 0 N o m W E o a _ m v m m > v o U — y J J Z J 6 O O p n u Z u Z Z Z Z Z Q W .J Total Deformation of o o O M o o M o 0 0 OF o m Q Layer (in) --------------- O o o c .= tp 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 V 0 0 Vertical p L2-03.. P C Reconsolidation 2o o o 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q 6 D 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 Strain E o o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N m 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Height of Layer o 0 o vo m o 0 0 o m o N N N ry N N N iP m N N N N Maximum Shearo o ro N o N c o0 0 0 0 0 m Strain y�I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 m r m r M M m n o ro Parameter Fo� Mo 0o v o � m L" ------------ Limiting Shear Strain M m m N V M Q O N O O Liquefaction Factor -- ¢ a Q m m m Q W N N Of Safety Z Z O O _¢ i M 6 O N N N ---------------- N N 0 0 (Ni)co.cs �- m m vi cJ o v o c 6 Ln of ri w --------------- M N N N N M M N M m Q Q ry N DN for fines content O N `O '- "' o m N m m M. V Q (N 060 " M v o co vi m id v ri M N M M N N `- A N N V] M m p V N N Depth to Midpoint m in m 1� m [V m W M �n of Q m Q m M ui � o (ft) ---------------- N N M M V Q y Depth to Bottom of "' "' N r N r N iM Layer (ft) Depth to Top of Layer O W n Q N N M M V Q Q p (if) Q m V/ N N m N V1 t0 N N N Sample Depth (ft) ^ m Q Q rn N m Q m Q v m M M V y Q Q M a 0 0 v a c m v v � O1 N N w � 0 m 0 0 N o m W o a _ m v m m > v o U — � 6 O O p u u O W .J O a C N N N T O� C O OF PC � O U O O N O S N O p L2-03.. P C O Q 6 D U i O U U U U N M Q N m r J M a Factor of Safety Cyclic Stress Ratio Induced by Design Cyclic Resistance Ratio (M=6.97) Cyclic Resistance Ratio (M=7.5) Ks MSF Eff. Overburden N 0 Stress (Curr. Water) E N lrso) (Pst) m Ul (] n a a a �vmva Stress (Hist. Water) Fines Content (%) P (psf) o „) Overburden Stress m O m (a) last) N Stress Reduction N J > Op O J O J O J O J O 2 O Z O 2 O Z C 2 Q ro n � o) o U 2 p U U m t w 2 m m`o Rod Length Q Ql0 H V o M z ` Depth to Top of LU U U U U 2 2 0 0 0 O N N 2 N (� Q N m m m m rn Q m 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 o c Q a V M In m O O a O C 2 2 O O N N Z N N Q Q M N l0 N O O¢ O O 2 2 0 0 0 N N 2 N N 0 0 o m m 0 0 to N t0 M O M M M h M M VN Eff. Overburden N 0 Stress (Curr. Water) E N lrso) (Pst) m Ul (] Eff. Overburden @ o aN > N Stress (Hist. Water) Fines Content (%) P (psf) o „) Overburden Stress m O m (a) last) N Stress Reduction N o m m m m m m m m ro ro ro n � o) o U 2 p U U m t w 2 m m`o Rod Length Coefficient (r,) H Correction o 0 z Z Depth to Top of LU U U U U rn 0 0 0 0 0 Cs Eff. Overburden CB G Stress (Curr. Water) E N lrso) (Pst) m Ul (] Eff. Overburden @ o aN > N Stress (Hist. Water) Fines Content (%) P (psf) o „) Overburden Stress '�O 6 m O m (a) last) N L @ N M M Uncorrected: (Ni)eocs in m m SPT N -Value. J W V Depth to Midpoint p= o O (Ni)eo m U 2 p U U m t w 2 m m`o Rod Length U E O S O do Correction CN a Z Cs M V M N V m V N N N� M M M CB Energy Correction E E N U) m 0 N N > N N Fines Content (%) Unit Weight of Soil m � O c v (Pcf) m N M M Uncorrected: w in m m SPT N -Value. J W V Depth to Midpoint Q o m C7 z Lu a ") o m (ft) 2 p aDepth to Bottom of U E .0 Layer '(k) a Z z Z Depth to Top of LU U U U U rn layer (k) N N N .� C 1� C! o 0 o m o Sample Depth (ft) J d d R W CO M V M N V m V N N N� M M M � In -�I"I"I�I-�I�-I-�I"I�-I"'I"ISI"I� -�1 011 -N I -N I -N I m1 1I �;1 �RI �I �I �I �8I �I v�I �I �I �--I r O N U) m N N N N N M 0 0 m v c v m m N M M V C V1 m m N N m V M In O m Q m m M m O N V M V 1� M � In -�I"I"I�I-�I�-I-�I"I�-I"'I"ISI"I� -�1 011 -N I -N I -N I m1 1I �;1 �RI �I �I �I �8I �I v�I �I �I �--I FN - z W 2 W J F W N W U 7 ❑ Z Z U F- U Q LL W rya V J s v E Total Deformation of Layer (in) v v m > Q O LL c� 2 O v T Ly J N v T 7 J of v T 27 J V v m _ J b m `v C z o O .o m v z Z 00 A n a 00 m M `v z 0 O M m Z 0 O o m z 0 O M m z 0 O .o m z 0 O Vertical o o v m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reconsolidation m o 0 o 0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Strain E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 00 p0 O O O O O O Height of Layer ° m °-> m o _ voi o In � m v N Maximum Shear w o o fo o v m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Strain y111t "' o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ? M N OI O > N U c v m n > o a o m 0 <° Parameter Fa N� o N N^ m o m T m^ o" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c; u; vi h m Limiting Shear Strain N o fo 0 O o mo 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 yIIIIII `� O O O O O O O O O O O O Liquefaction Factor ¢_ °2 ^_ a n �� N N Of .Safety d,¢ `� Z Z O O O ,^„ O N N Z N N N N N ° t u v WW W N li ? N w O O aWi v v z u u DN for fines content O m o U U U U �m m g M o 0 O N N R t0 N V to M O O D (N ) m N m w m v v o m m r Depth to Midpoint Depth to Bottom of Layer (F) Depth to Top of Layer (ft) Sample Depth (ft) N �' � m v m v v m v m v v m N N N M V a V m N N a_ 9 N `v v N N 0 ° m °-> m o _ N � m v Q w w ° o � V O ? M N OI O > N U c v m n > o a o 0 N 61 O N� N U J U N U V � � ` N J m u v o o ° t u v WW W N li ? N w O O aWi v v z u u O m o U U U U �m m SOUTHERN 1 CALIFORNIA � GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-1 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/15/04 WATER DEPTH: Dry PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 27.5 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kos READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS ¢U SURFACE ELEVATION:1275 feet MSL LABORATORY RESULTS FZ ZIZ a p U� Oz wwN �~ U�LL ZO w ` TOPSOIL: 4 to 6f inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium 11 Sand, some organic material, loose - dry 91 14 EI = 19 (0 to 3 feet ALLUVIUM: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay, slight calcareous veiningslightly , htl g y porous, loose to medium dense - damp to moist 10 104 16 5 9 107 17 21 107 19 5 108 17 10 ALLUVIUM: Brown Clayey fine Sand, some Silt, loose -moist to very moist 9 21 15 ALLUVIUM: Dark Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense - moist 14 17 20 ALLUVIUM: Brown fine to medium Sand, trace to little it, medium dense - damp to very moist 19 g 25 30 13 Boring Terminated at 30' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-2 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/15/04 WATER DEPTH: Dry PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 18 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl pas READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS LABORATORY RESULTS W u z z w 0 o O DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 1281 feet SL o w �W Co 0 2 0 F 0- 0 m wO Y5 U a 0 zw LLZ~KQ O z=ow D Z 0 O TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium 18 Sand, some organic material, loose - dry 112 9 ALLUVIUM: Dark Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, - trace Clay, loose to medium dense - damp to moist 12 95 15 Disturbed Sample 5 18 115 12 wn ALLUVIUM: Dark BroClayey fine to medium Sand, some Sill, medium dense - moist ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, trace fine 18 Gravel, medium dense - damp to moist 115 9 22 102 13 ALLUVIUM: Brown Silly fine Sand, medium dense - moist 10 13 9 15 ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay, loose - moist 9 13 Boring Terminated at 20' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-3 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/15/04 WATER DEPTH: 12 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 12.5 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY Daryl Kea READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS v DESCRIPTIONo ELEVATION: 1287 feet MSL LABORATORY RESULTS Z :5SURFACE °o onNWU Q_ oa � O a W yivW~i�z a mUow a oNQ O — TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brawn Silty fine to medium 12 4.5+ _ Sand, some organic material, loose - dry 100 18 FILL: Dark Brown to Black fine Sandy Clay to Clayey fine Sand, medium stiff to medium dense - moist 15 114 15 POSSIBLE FILL: Dark Brown Clayey fine to medium Sand, medium dense- moist 5 17 116 16 ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, loose to medium dense - moist to very moist 14 112 18 109 20 10 ALLUVIUM: Brown fine to medium Sand, trace Sill, trace fine Gravel, loose to medium dense - wet 9 24 15 32 17 –20 Boring Terminated at 20' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ' GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-4 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6115/04 WATER DEPTH: Dry PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 17.5 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS LABORATORY RESULTS w om w DESCRIPTION f o Z w¢n 0 Zw Z' w NO :2 ao �0 SURFACE ELEVATION: 1279 feet K oa0C, O a> �� ¢N ana z=O O v O TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, some organic material, loose -dry 19 93 10 ALLUVIUM: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, slightly porous, loose -- to medium dense - damp to moist 6 96 15 5 10 103 19 16 103 20 ALLUVIUM: Brown Clayey fine Sand, some Silt, slight calcareous veining, slight porosity, loose to medium dense - moist 8 115 16 10 811, 9 5 15 ALLUVIUM. Brown fine to medium Sand, trace Silt, loose - very moist to wet 9 19 20 Boring Terminated at 20' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA �. GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-5 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/15/04 WATER DEPTH: 7 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 43 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kos READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS o u DESCRIPTION LABORATORY RESULTS F w i z o w 0- e wF m ❑ -- z0 w U w z �z U C7w LL~ z M S d Y„ S a w Dw O H ztu zn w w Q 0M ?U Nz =~ Q~ No C,w 26 o m m a� c0 SURFACE ELEVATION: 1286 feet MSL o 0- a a� z ai — TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, some organic material, loose - dry 28 109 17 EI = 17 (0 to 5 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand trace Clay, medium dense - damp to moist feet) ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense _ 16 - moist 117 13 5 18 112 16 ALLUVIUM: Brown fine to medium Sand, trace Silt, medium densedense - wet 12 17 13 117 16 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brawn Silty fine to medium Santl, loose to 10 - medium dense -very moist to we[ ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Clayey fine to medium Sand, iron oxide staining, loose - wet 9 22 31 15 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, trace 16 Clay, medium dense - very moist to wet 15 28 20 11 18 29 25 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fineBand fo fine Sandy Silt, some iron oxide staining, medium dense - wet 16 22 45 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown fine to coarse Sand, some iron oxide staining, dense - very moist 39 15 7 FEST BORING LOG PLATE B -5a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-5 JOB NO.: 04G 16o DRILLING DATE: 6/15/04 WATER DEPTH, 7 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 43 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS LABORATORY RESULTS S LToW Wu- z0z W >❑ , DESCRIPTION U F U Z UOwLL.. z zO tQWJl LL0 tKl rLL, hoz V O< 0WY K0 00 O Z= O o=HW (Continued) 0 0-D 0 73 0 U ALLUVIUM: Light Brawn fine to coarse Sand, some iron oxide staining, dense - very moist ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium 25 dense - very moist 16 33 40 25 17 35 45 .._._.- - ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine to coarse Sand, very dense - wet 9/11' 15 17 Boring Terminated at 50' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B -5b SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/16/04 WATER DEPTH: 16.5 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 17 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kos READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS O S DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 1293 feet MSL LABORATORY RESULTS W ov w LL a o W ua z o U O m z a W U� at W o- o n DZ Laz �U o— U u~ih a 0 u C7W �o au wu- zron LL~ Uw �o TOPSOIL: 4 to 6t inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium 36 Sand, some organic material, loose -dry 103 9 FILL: Dark Brown Clayey fine to medium Sand, trace Silt, porous, dense - damp ALLUVIUM: Dark Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, h ace 27 Clay, medium dense - moist 119 12 5 14 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium 107 11 dense - moist 27 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, trace fine 119 11 Gravel, medium dense - moist 14 120 15 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Clayey fine to medium Sand, 10 medium dense -very moist 12 18 15 - ALLUVIUM: Light Brown fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt, medium dense - wet 21 18 p _..__ Boring Terminated at 20' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-6 SOUTHERN �+ CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-7 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/16/04 WATER DEPTH: 9 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 15 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS c0 DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 1287 feet MSL LABORATORY RESULTS O O w Tslo z ., tt 0 a �� F w rn 00 v 0 5 F O� H m 1 -¢WO <Q a z Ul a rx zenz �O Z Zs z m TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brown Silty fine to medium 11 Sand, some organic material, loose - dry 90 14 FILL: Dark Brown Silly fine Sand, loose - damp 19 ALLUVIUM: Dark Brown to Black Silty fine Sand, medium 109 15 dense - moist 5 15 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Silly fine to medium Sand, loose to 109 16 medium dense - moist 2 113 13 16 Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense - very 118 14 10 _ moist to wet 19 15 30 14 20 — 27 14 Boring Terminated at 25' TEST BORING LOG PLATE B-7 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL BORING NO. B-8 JOB NO.: 04G160 DRILLING DATE: 6/16/04 WATER DEPTH: 14 feet PROJECT: 336 Unit Residential Development DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CAVE DEPTH: 22 feet LOCATION: Lake Elsinore, California LOGGED BY: Daryl Kos READING TAKEN: at Completion FIELD RESULTS U DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 1293 feet MSL LABOR LABORATORY Ao0TO� RFmY R EranSw�aULTS zw w C u wLLa, om D m w cY.tLL¢ c- z 'a o 0 v zo LL� f o¢>LLr_ zM 0 —v TOPSOIL: 4 to 6± inches Light Brawn Silty fine to medium 28 Sand, Borne organic material, loose - dry 90 4 FILL: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, plastic debris, medium dense - dry 27 POSSIBLE FILL: Brown Silly fine to medium Sand, medium dense - dry to damp 141 5 5 28 ALLUVIUM: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, medium dense - moist 111 8 33 119 9 30 113 12 10 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown fine to medium Sand, trace Silt, trace fine Gravel, dense - wet 36 = 18 15 50 20 20 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Clayey fine to medium Sand, some Silt, iron oxide staining, medium dense - very moist 26 14 25 39 X 23 18 Boring Terminated at 30' TEST BORING LOG QJ N2 E2 O C E u 'O fU Q tll U a � O H N O MOISTURE C ❑l O O Y N DRY DENSITY (7 ri (PCF) v � o Z � O U O SAMPLE m M0 U F- a p DEPTH o N z m = N o W T L IL E v W U� CLLLI H o LLl Y a � r. w o w ❑ w � � � Q Z W a w w W � U O CL O 6a C7 C � 3 o CA cm (0 m N I— V /�/� `- L N O = f] J � Y0 c U ev z v W p o � Z m ~ z i d � z o n 9 CL � w > � v ..+ � a o 0-' w ¢z a COD a E E N f— W www y E Q O 0 a � DEPTH N o W 0 ❑ �v9x ° E 4 d W N - QF c U a� d O 41 GrciUU D �-. N � N � 'm o MOISTURE (% ) o 'c w o o ❑ Y N w DRY DENSITY (PCP) s�S N poz ?�o SAMPLE O W 0 � Z -� Q LL' oig O 0 a � DEPTH o Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Classification: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay oring Number: B-1 Initial Moisture Content (%) 13 .._. 1 ., ._...__ — -I 93.5 pecimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 104.1 pecimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.63 Water Added at 1800 psf 4 N 6 I G O i ( N 0 810 � I f 12 � I 14 0.1 l 1 10 100 load (ksp Classification: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay oring Number: B-1 Initial Moisture Content (%) 13 ample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 24 epth (ft) 1 to 2 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 93.5 pecimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 104.1 pecimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.63 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 _..� Street, 1266 Anah Hancock rnia92807 Suite 161 PLATE C- 1 714hei7.0333mFia(714) Phone: 1]141 ]]]6333 Fax: 777-0390 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Load (ksf) Classification: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay Boring Number: B-1 Initial Moisture Content (%) Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) Depth (ft) 3 to 4 Initial Dry Density (pcf) Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 16 23 101.9 109.0 0.11 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 1 60 MM1 Hancock Street, Suite 101 PLATE C- 2 Ae 4 777-0 California PM1one: (71 ]14�]]]-0333 Fax: (714) x]14)]]]-9398 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Load (ksf) Classification: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay Boring Number: B-1 Initial Moisture Content (%) 17 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 24 Depth (ft) 5 to 6 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 105.9 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 110.3 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.32 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 1200 North Hancock Street, Suite Ot PLATE C- 3 Foahei7- 33�i(oFax (714) Phone (714) 777-0333 Fax: (714) 777-0398 Classification: Dark Brown Silty fine Sand, trace Clay Boring Number: B-1 Initial Moisture Content (%) 19 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 20 Depth (ft) 7 to 8 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 105.6 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 113.9 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.13 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 . 1260 Anaheim, Hancock Street Suite 101 92807 PLATE C- 4 (714) 77-0333foFax (714) Phone: x]141 ]]Z0333 Fax: 777-0398 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Load (ksf) Classification: Gray Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, trace Clay Boring Number: B-5 Initial Moisture Content (%) 17 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 20 Depth (ft) 1 to 2 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 108.2 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 112.2 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.00 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 1260 North Naucock Street, Suite 101 PLATE C- 5 AnahFax: (714) eim, °alifo a 92807 Phone: (]14)]]]t0833 Fax: ]]-0398 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Classification: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand Boring Number: B-5 Initial Moisture Content (%) 12 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 17 Depth (ft) 3 to 4 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 117.7 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 121.2 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.00 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 1266 North Hancock Street, Suite 191 92807 PLATE C- 6 Anaheim, 333 Fax: (714) Phone (]14�]]]-6333 Fax: Q14�]]]-6396 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results Classification: Brown Silty fine to medium Sand Boring Number: B-5 Initial Moisture Content (%) 16 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 17 Depth (ft) 5 to 6 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 111.5 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 116.6 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.00 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 S 1260 Anah Hancock S2807 Sure 101 PLATE C- 7 714) 77T70333foFax (714) Phone: 014) ]]]-0333 Fax: P14) 777-0398 Consolidation/Collapse Test Results 0.1 1 10 100 Load (ksf Classification: Brown fine to medium Sand. trace Silt Boring Number: B-5 Initial Moisture Content (%) 16 Sample Number: --- Final Moisture Content (%) 17 Depth (ft) 7 to 8 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 111.8 Specimen Diameter (in) 2.4 Final Dry Density (pcf) 116.0 Specimen Thickness (in) 1.0 Percent Collapse (%) 0.00 336 Unit Residential Development Southern California Geotechnical Lake Elsinore, California Project No. 04G160 1260 North Hancock Street, Suite 101 PLATE C- 8 Nnahelm, California 92807 Phone: (714) 777-0333 Fax: (714) 777-0398 Appendix D Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, April 28, 2015 0 \ j \ ; / _ E & < \ . ` ff } - : — � : z_ \ \ � \ { Cc: K2 § § / F-E , E & — � \ { \ } - , LUE G L)/ \ ) \ } \ \ § / ) : - L) 3 ( 3 - # % : 6 / o y 2 / - E 6 ) V)% 0 — § § \ \ / \/ j 7 ) YI v o a � U r M 1 a y n O N loo 0 Z S io I 1 1 c 2 to la .�- 0 U T to N 0 U I M a m N OU � m Im n � I I� N I M M U o IW n Z N iN O O n O m m iN a r z I 1 a m R~ O I^ V io N I I O N NN 1� fN1 a to I I I� dN am s� lid N In n wa o� io I I I� jN «N sN m to I I m Im a� «� io LL a to I I �e o� 0 wa 10 I 1 Im n ao lmo ma m io xa LL to to I v 1v o � �O ANO �O io IN 1 N lid O I o oM oM NO N oo INo � N I e I� I I o N 1 1 r� IQ O O U a �a i I to M 10 I I Ox IN y o I �- I I o ¢ zo Im to I v cu v N N M N ,N 1 io � n g O Z to to 1 1 I n jm M S to U 0 to .�- 0 T I V w N 0 U a m a � I N M M d M Z N iN O O n O N O m 1 I� R~ I^ V io N 1 NN 10 1 1 I,n dN am lid Io I I o l0 0 o� sN m to I I m Im r «� 0 �o 0 wa a > 1 N I� lmo ma m io e LL to I v 1v IV �O ANO �O IN 1 N O U �v I` I m m N Ox m Ie N Z I� I I o N O O Im a K 10 I I N N M O N 0 0 LU W W (0 U C O U 0 0 2 W W 0 U cu C O m Qf Q O m d N O pM N M •mM O � m � Nm • M � m oM w Ipo o Ip to d IpM N z wo irvo Io �p I�o Iri Id IoM to Im la to IM Im Iw I 1� io U p lao Ip Iw IM o la IM to 1 to Ip I g m I M I M I I M I I M N V N O M IN N I I� IM mN � m m r ---- 1- IM I Im to IN I to to I to I m � NO U p IN I�o to io m I� I� to fo U N � b N !b r • r M I Im I I I Ie I Ip O jo �o jo m 6.� O to � I I 1 I I I I I eirN ".m Im IM to to m ry W4 o io I I ;o I I M io I I is I I e v 9 p LL ' I I IN t o I IM I I Im I I 10 c dr m to Ian I IN I to 1 io .- �n r"i. p � to Ip to to to fo to a n .cyam to to l0 0 T w____�__ 1 I O I _________ � I N � I I ry LL a M I I i I Ioa 1 I IM Im I 1 I 1 I I___ I I I N N ON �p Imo N m I I m I� to 1 I IM I I I 1 o n O U a to I� I i N o c I to im N I m I iM I I I i i f i ry m O% z ;. o o ____I m ry Ip I I to IM 1 I I Im I I I I I I I I M M � O a 1 1 i v I v N N M O N a 0 LU LU W m U Q O a 0 LU W W m U m m U tl m m 10 10 to Iv ry ZO Imp INO la Ip to I i�o i� ro a Im I Iw o 1 I Irn c 10 lui I i Im i� o o m a U r o Ica to Iw IM M Iv 10 to to ` o r 1 T � IMIp Im Im N O U IN 1`✓O IN iM m a rn 1� 16 I� IN roN In IN to I to c ro O o IN. Imo Ia Ia nm a m ro 10 Im 10 10 O N M S N b r r0 r0 O ON i i �2 m _ ....... T.._...n .... .f........ T........ N- w 1 Irn IN I Irp Irn I 10 l0 I 10 Ip m a~ Io Ip Ip 10 1 I I I « m Irn IM to IO b �N 10g a IN 1m 10 10 O 10 10 10 10 N W 4 O to Ip Ip to 0 I I I I I vrn «N I IM 1 I I M rng I tr 1 n W d ____ a Ir ---_ rp IN o I 'r ---_ m 10 I 'r ---. 1 0 to I f __. 1 0 to 0 r0 oq �o to la Jo to m p, l- p a to Im IN I� IN Ir to 10 l0 to to l0 m V by � r.° to to to to N xa l0 10 l0 10 p I I I IN I I I 1 N Np mg I In lia ____f_. w om 1 _f.___f____r. Iv loa 1� o Im I I I __ M N NO 0 to i W np Imo c ._._ m I I ---- m 1 IF j .- I I I -- —f----'--- to 1 Im Ir I I f-'-- I I f---- o Z to 1 IM 1 I I I I n N c � to 1 to 1 I I N u N N M 0 N a 0 71w w m O i 0 w w (0 U O F o � o U V N d Q; Z J N N N L v - o U �U jo jo io ' v, � N Ir ,M 10 IN M U C V N d Q; N N L a o jo io jo jo io ' v, � N Ir ,M 10 IN iN I I I I 2 -- M jh jN jN __ I rIt) Ih rn T 1 I 1 1 I Z I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I _IN IM Ih It0 'n co ilo ,co ,n In I I I 1 _ I I , I I QI T F- I I I I ' i 2 - I I I I o 1 - ry � '— IN E 'C Ir m Z o _ m c L y •U d- V L a� ZO EI il a. a m 0 iu 0 N N V N (6 N N M O N 0 O w w LU m U O a cO w w LU N U a 6 6 r0 �'O O r0 O O O O O O O O Of. U' LL 0 J^ r r r r r r r r r r r W I(D h I10 M Ifo Ir 1N ilO ia1 IN Ic0 I� !QI IC' IN � of 1� I I I I .o 'o 'o 12..;'. oof oro oro ooro oro oro or om o os: d? I I 1� I Nr^ 3! r r r......r......r. ..r r r.....r...... r......r......r...... r... --- r ------ r......r------ r......r..... IM IN IM 1� IN I� I� INIMIN IN IN 1� 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I QS': I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I N I 6 I N �W iN I o I O IY IY "5L' ,N IN 'm IN Im Im I 1 N I N N W N , O 1 O 1 N I❑ 1 N , N , N I N 1 C -7 . 7. .. .. i. is .. .. �a E m Z e e e r2 ,O w`. U ' U ' (i ' (i j O) � Ol � U O O O R 2 "O ,'O r "O D D • "O • D D D R G G G L E E E •o '(D 'C9'¢ N N co 0 N a 0 LU W m U C O 0 0 W LU m U N N � N N m mU U -,m n M � a Z a o U� y 0 F - m � O I `o:U � a o 9 F j x r n _ IZE h r U O O O m 2 A2' O � o 2; a d � m � m N >1. N N YU x_ 1 x_ _x r x 1 x_ x N I2i �3 1�E 2 >`O ❑I ❑ ❑I O 1 ❑ 1 ❑I to J IJ J 0 IJ l o IJ o J 0 to f ,o It La O ON O m1 a N 1 NO ' N 1 O ~O LL O O IN � J i m 2: O r -1O r0 1 �O iOI i O . IT �O 10 l' IW (O I (O 110 I t0 I Ip � [O rO;CI LL v v (n I I I 1 1 c OU t Ir 14 In 10 .L ~irn v V 14 14 IV 1 I z , c U' n O K O 10 r0 l0 I 10 0 - 2!1 ' 0 10 10 O r0 to FN O j0 j0 'O 'O 10 mEL m U O N 1 1 � 1 1S += Z m I O 10 10 10 10 0 a;l o l0 10 Io to to 'r'N N 1� IN I� 10 Iry S Oz 1 1 I 1 1 I I I _ _.. �0 1n Im 1m I<o 1� I I I C St I I I 1 0 w w 0 m'U i 1 i I i I i I 1 1 I I I I 1 0...: 1 I I r 'C r0 r0 •� m E V m m o y U w U o a In r � a' o ' 0 N N � N p U n M � a Z a o U� 0 F - O � O n m � a o 9 F r n _ O h r U O O O m 2 O � o U a d � m � N a o ~O tL o N d V wa to >'n �a � O ly ry N r.- N O ~O LL O O �a jo LL v v (n p O v� c OU n z c U' n O K o 0 0 � v L h U O N N M O N a O Lli LU W m U C O a O LU LU (0 U tD r O N C O O E N 0 N t`7 N N O ,a d U r r M U o 0 Z o Io l0 0 Z Io Io I I i to Iv o to to v .r 2 o c U to l0 0 1= Ino O I 1 ^ OU to Im m o M O IG I I __ I to Im N O U l0 Im N b IM r la I, Z n n 0 V Z b N m o O U io icy 0 0 m �� v �� n ! O I loo o io is No c O 00 la to O a� pN a°.�e to to o Io to oul Qo txa w to loo 1 I I I I 1p� >Tg 100 Io co 7LL Ic I Iv a a u I I 10 o� Imo to eo dh N I�oO l0 I� ------------- o io io i mo Wa O � o �� ioo l0 1 � N N X� a LL I I I I I to l0m oN ON o U j0 jo0 m o 0 0N l0 I� 0 0 NO oM U U to to I to 1 Ino I I o i o 0 x p o V oc oa Z i0 j0o o0 1� IK I I io io_ o� a O O a 00 MU o IN N0 M o i I� I I e O M r S • N j f a U N N UU r r M O N o 0 Z 2 U c 1= ' O ^ U m ti N 0 r r n n m Z N p O O U 0 0 m v v N O O O a� io 1p� o wa o N q� LLLL N O W � F O a � N N X� a w m o =o �a u. 0 0 o V O w o0 a e� O MU M e O M Z a a O o 0 0 0 - � o L H � p N N O N a 0 W W U O 0 LU W W 16 U M M N Q O p YI U _ I Ip o 0 O io I �o 1 IOp OM ON U lop to o I io o I I o 0 2 Io I o Io to 1 I to jv w a U � l0 ,o0m to Ipoa oom o � 0 p I0 I o0 � r Ir p I'm N N Q F 1� _ I _ p O to IM Io I� M r 1 _ 1 to Im U O o Ip Im Io Irmi n m la I� z 0 U o 0 0 1 N_ r iN N Np o Ir al- 0 I IvOio yo » IN N AN o i o j I� NN p 10 IOM p O� xa W w� ip iop I0 I� I 1 I I o I I ^I o� o v>n N 0 10 Op p� ud ao 0 Io la O a r a »o 'mom r - I 1 I ti o I� �� n H i 0o to Imo ip �o i� I I o j �� l0 10m oln �� Ip Ioo 0 1p 1 00 ix° _T O j I o I I to to to I v mo Y $o 0 IN LLd Ip Imo to Iv low cy m Io 0 U 10 to o I o I o p I m d 0 0 0 Iry I INO I I to Iw NO v Ip I la I in Q O Ip IOM pM INo p IO i t Ip Ir I I to lov r a �O � m o iK 0 100 to 0 Ip Iv.� voi U ;O I Ir io iv to Ipa no � O 0a I Ioo oa O Io IN0 NO L. rn - M M N Q O p YI U _ I Ip o 0 O io I �o 1 IOp OM 2 U o I io N � I � o Im F 1� _ I _ m Iw 0 U m p 1 N_ r iN N Np o Ir I » IN N AN I� wa �o I _ r I r Vv1 w� o I ao li d I I _ I ip o 0 DA ao io I Ir o la r a »o 'mom o I� o: I Zm o j o I Iv Ioo v ooa N O in ioo $o IN O m Io U p I Iry z Ip I la I in a N O INo tt IO i t � m o iK O U ;O ~ fD O N R t6 CL m a Y O m m U _ I 0 l0 0 ON Z o o Id I o I o M p �y00j 0 o M b� = U to to OO O o to I I N a I o I o 0 z N O I� to I I to I� v O c o m O to Im o l .- U o loo o to I 00 w Ie 1n F Ir - I __ o la Iro U m z N N N 0 to Im m p o 0 Ia e 10 IN N � U to IM 1 b to le Io 10 m Z I I Q N O a� m I N o iM I h p Ip I� v 10 I oa ea 0 1� VN 10 IN I I i� od 0 1 In o rnN � o O loo lore ul Wa 0 n IO to o Ip to I I� I I to loa ao i pa >N �g ip imp ee Ii 0' - 0 to IN .____�____ io io to to ri v on _ m l o ip ioa a� o a oa to I� to Io o to la d o� Hp xa 0 ce o io ia� p w a n o o I I I I op to I m to laa oa Op > Io I IN ^ 0 to loo p 0 O% LL6 ry Im 10 10 o a eN N O N jo joo oe m 10 o I I to loo � O U loo Irop 1 I rn ii O I la l0 1� Ve x O LL o pa ea 0 to to d O K io ioa Ip i� oa o 1 IM t i h v o O Z ri raj ~ U N O o Ip U _ I 0 l0 0 ON Z o o Id I o I o M p �y00j 0 o M b� = U OO T I N IN m N O O c o m O Im o l .- m I____ N U 1n a o la Iro V m z p I� I O N 0 m 1 a� to I N o iM I h l0 I M1 i 0 1� VN N 0 1 In o 0 0 ao 0 �0 I 1 In 0 n � to wd0 O I o j 0 Zo m l o wa o i I lO lov o a oa ON N to 0 ce o IN I o N n r" O U Io I IN ^ 0 O% ry Z p I ja N O O 10 No � la I LL G S1 N N M O N 0 0 W W R U 0 a LU3 W W U N O U c I 0 10 0 O O o to jo to to Z o 0 M a IO to I I r ---- to to to I v oN 'o Z U 0 io foo 00 g Iv a O U r- Im N Q O 10 Iry U ~ to IM m 12 o o i o w F O I� 1 I I o to IN O Q U N m Z a to Im Ir IN �O m O I 10 o O O N fl U m o 0 0 • I m • �] Im a� I I 0 10 I w ti NO ID Io0 00 � p i0 ino ^O Y�lF �N IVl N I IN 1 I, o mN w� A la Ipo oN Oa vN �o o� Via' io po �1V No vp LL i0 io< o I LLd O 10 I�o,o 10 IN I t o I v eon N ti IO I I im n� t o 0 o to loo c o AF' o I 1 I I, to to o to to v ✓�o i� o la to 1 wA 'L � io io 0 O 1 1 I Imo' M1 1 o to to 10 IOa oa zo LL 10 Im o I o I v a N 0 0 o la loo oN I ry l0 10 I 1 I� IoM U U N n o NO a INo N� Io o Iv I I � L, 0 0 0 0 oa Z o p ____ I 1 r____Ir 1 I I. o o to loy c oa 0 � _ o to I to Ido o0 U ;0 N I 0 10 0 O Z o 10 I t oo IM M a I 'o U l0 0 o g I I a IM - O U Im m ~ I b IN N m Z Ir IN �O r 0 U o G ;o m • I �] Im a� 0 ,o 1 �N IVl N o 0 w� A io _ I 1 Oa vN > a 1 rni o I No vp LL o I o A IO I I im m �o 0 1 ly O 1 1 I Imo' ooa O Im 1 I� to 1 IN O I ry N I IN In N n O Io � L, I to a D p � O _ F U ;0 RP 7 N N N a 0 LU W W f0 U O 0 0 W W U 0 N c 140, v O o m U io O I I to Z o 0 O z ioo ioo io 2 U 0 to l0 0 a to to 1 I I I la I� d n 2 U to lop O� o j0 foo no U r 0 10 I Im n NO 10 O U o Ia Im n N m n .R � Z to in Io IN N r U I I O m U jo j� m m 1n o IN N �H Z O 10 1 _ 1 _ I a N OO O 1 I NN ro O IN o .a o 0 1 I, xa W Io I I I 0 O 10 lop C� N«� �F n 10 Imo �o 4 l0 IO I Im N to IM `mo L�to I I I I O yu> i0 d o l0 10 d �� 1 � I O 10 Io0 c0 0 WLL 10 Io0 1 IN I I to I � NO ti vm w>.N I I I Iv op jo ipp OQ ma to Im LL IW O OV to Id to lom m O N ar° Z I I jo n O Io IM ____i _ _1 ;___ to Iv Io Mo u QO ui m� Io IooO oa WLL _T io O 0 IN 1 I N O r U q� o 0 Io no LL° iin o v N io ioN � O la loo 00 h Ia o0 0 Iv I I jo jry d O o N U to to 10 to I I 1 I O t0 to D O o`" Z I� ISO 10 I� Ir r I I. � to Id w � O M O 0 0 � O IO loo I t� o O oo m m U io O to Z I to 1 1 Im M z io 0 U o to a t n NO U o o0 1ry In r 10 I Im n NO U N m IN r Im n Z _ I _ U d � m 1 1n a N �H O 10 1 a to 1 I NN O IN xa W Io I I I 0 IM n O� 4h l0 IO I Im N 0 M `mo L�to O i0 O WLL w N O 1 � I >O � o I 3a u I I I Iv op u oa O O 'oo to O U �n 1" I IN O N N Z I I jo n O � Io I O r U LL N N M O N 0 O LLi W @ U O N a 0 2i W LU m U N p O p N I I o O U p c v om t o j o 0 2 to l0 ON to Io I I Im lo' O Sa x U 0 o to loo o to Imm n O � I o n N O v 2 ioo i 0 0 U 10 I o I o jm Im Ir n O U a Ia I� m m N Z Im IN I I 'o p U M t+1 � m N d • 1 • I O U Im Id u NO a to loy oo .p 6~ ID 2 to Io0 O j0 jm0 m0 N I Im 1 I �� to Iv O Im Im ti oN U o Imm I000 c wa j o io im 00 m Im Im o `N N o io iom p4 as ++ a Im Imo ~O a I I ro to Iv a a_ a Im In m In I I �o `xa m im iom o� ID j, o Im IN I I O i0 ion o0 N on ZO MO }�a ;O ioo I I lo to Im Imo ti LLa O N o to to o to l0 o� 0 I Ipm 10 IN yo N p IO IV, V m to to Im Im I 1 I to jv x O o Im l0 0 Z � im hyo Im I� I I �o 'mom Im Ion o O mo im iom � a m Im i� I 1 om _ _ :o o j O c N m o O U c v N ON o 0 Z O la v 2 0 0 U o 0 p M t+1 � N N O U a a a M '' ID 2 N N O 0 U c m o ~O a o wN m N� N m wa o LLa oY m m � o 'mom m ° Lu _ _ o j O LLa. N w Oo00 on N N m O � U O eZ m N O O tt n n o a o U O G 7 I v U c y 1 I a Ip Io 0 O to l0 0 Z Ip Ip 1 I I I o I� Id u c x loc IoM o U o to I`o INp I no U N IN N i 1- I I_ r r O H N U O I„ Iro N N O U IN IM tp N m N p IN to p N v z IM i� O N Q a a U O m m N ry z N IoM Ian 8 fl IN to I 1 ��y jo I� IpM Ipc a OM � o No Imo Mo o N Ir I I I I to Ia n >'n p O p O O j2 o Ip wLL LLLL Irip I I oo I� I� '� IM N pq a4- 0 10, to Ip I I LLa >� n o IaM loa oM po �F w°' a iwo im rvio to I� �6 LL n to to 1 1 I 1 0 1v Iv 0 i O :. p 10� Ipp NO Iep lao m I M I .- I I o la IM U I^ Ih I� Iy o U I 0 Im I- m O LL p m m 0o a o m 0 Z p Io Io o iv io p a 0 � O O Ip 10 N � N 0 to to I 1 0 N O d v s O m U U I v O c a O a 2 a a x o U H N U M M � N N F N O a a U O m N ry z N 8 m O � a� o N wLL dN �N LLa n n �F a n n No w° >p LL d N p n O m p N N O O m U x O a e N N N 0 n K 0 0 - v � a 0 U O N N ri O N a O 2 W W @ U O O 0 LU W W @ U r � N a U > f O Z Z o la to 10 to I I I I lov jo � N N 2 0 0 0 Irr � ---- 1� Iro h (N.l U IN I� N - ry IN to N F U i___I r - IN Im � Ory U a 10 I N Iry I � b Z im io p U o 0 0 b • I • 2 N I o iom in r O o V 4� 100 to m 10 I I, I o NN N 0 Io Iv o I laa 4' .�c� 0 10r to 00 Mo xa W '.o I� 10 IN0 Iro iv im m a ver, c N LLp o loo 10 O In I I F�2 O O I .0c '� vN loo Ioo 00 T c O o r r I 1 10 IN w j0 ti a LL to to I I oo Iw Iv v N O � j�o j0o I Ic0 Poo m I I 1 O1 U 1� 10 to to 1 t 1 Im I� m O I I� o Id to F 0. o to to I I I I Iv to a U' � >: io l0 0 z l0 10 I I o' O _ ;9 •Y aL LL � N a O O Z o 0 N N 2 0 0 U 0 N - ry U n m N F- N Q ry p 0 2 N O o V c m o � N of o F�2 O O W 41- o vN �N P`L ti a N o� 0 a F 0. tL >: F' o' Z� aL LL N� N o0 oro O h Mo o0 Mo O h x z U ul 0 0 O F- U N N m O N a O 2 LU Lu m U O N 0 w w U n r O o 0 U _ � O I I O to i� N 10 10 Z I 10 to I loM N =lov U IOO Imo Oo IMO O V� U IN N I I -i�- U O Im N p Im U -f f n N O U F N m lin 1� 1 IM n Z I 1 N o U � m b .o Z m � 0 0 U b I o M I r m 6 IN IO O I I O r a y N o iv iv d � IMo I V� W4 1- Ito I I N O to to li u I I. I to I to I`y o m �o Imo to 0 dl- Iv 10 o Io I I I Iv IoM Ioc � �� 10� xm w I� IM o IoM I� o 2� W� INo to lia - IviO to I 1 I I O IN IN N N O ion iia oa y IMS I�!o LL a v I Ir I I o i� itn c O to IN m U Io to I i 1 1 I 1'n la to O Z o IO to I I I I to I a O � o I N o l 0 0 @ m I Io 0 z I� I I I O oM w z - v n r v N a O N Z N N S o U N U N n N F N O h N o � m Z � 0 0 U b in N O O O r a N M n W4 li u go 0 a� o � � O 10� xu o W a c '4 - N �O LL a v a O Q M m O � � U w m 0 O oM w z 9 o ~ U O M N N M N 0 O LU W m U c O 0 0 W W m U JL v i p U � n U pN O o l0 to 0 I o io Io ON Io l0 I I I I v loo' to 0 oM S U o Io Ip o loo In <O r I� INp N l0 0 Io 2 to U M Ip Mo o I b f r r - N U o d oo in iro m mIN C5 I ^ m F 'o 0 O O a Ip a U m Io 0 'p m o Ip 2 I I 1 I 0 Iv I no 10 In Op IMo I� m 4~ .o Ip IN 0 o to m .o I I -F -F I I I NN p to Ipa on Vo W� .. 0 io iiDo M i __ I __ _ I 0 1 a «N io o IpM IM m I _F I I I io o i�g io 0 o r---- Iv Iwu o I lov mN I`n m`L O IoM loo o NO o £a W 5 o Irvo Im 1 1,6 j N o oo IoM ^o and IM o O LL I I INo l0 1� I I___ I I o v � 0 m N O < Io oo loo Io d' Oa Ip o I� In I 1 Ih to m O U I" IN O IO IN o Ip Ip I I a M Ip 1 � to o NO o Io la z Io Io I ---- I I la Iw 0 p INp 1p � INp Ip 0 --------------- I LLLL I I O � � U pN N I ON o to o Io Ip o i t O l0 0 Io 2 to U M Ip Mo o I e U m jo F N I � N N O a Ip a U m Io m o Ip 2 I I V .o m .o I Ip N a~ 10 io I _F I o mN o 10 wa Ip I I j N I LLLL I I < Io a o� Ip a� Ip 1 � to a NO 14 `� lop z� I LLLL I I N oo I o a O $ t N I 1 I M p I U I I I I O I X O I z � I I I 1 � Ip Z I I o 0 N N M O N 0 O LU LU m U 0 O 0 O W W m U v v a � O U N I jo jo ON o to Io 0 � to l0 I 1 I I o to to 0 Z x o Io Io � U o I jp joy I I io 10 co a g 1 1 io i v d 0 U lop to ly M � Mo to to IM l0 1" � o F to o I __ 1 jo 1� .- •- N O U a to IM l0 1� m o 1 Z a 0 0 U U Ip m to a m o O to w F � I N d M � to l0a o0 w p i� ap 2 I NN o to to 00 WA p Ip to I Imp I I I to lov 0 oa ?N I ua M� I v I 1 o iv a a i� imp ar l0 1� I I u rg xa 1 to to p to Io o w ` a Io Iv �N Np 2� Ip to to Imo oa Ip 1� LL 0 I 1� t I o 1 N Q '. pU o � io lop o ip to op 1 Iry I U I 1 U to to ip Im 4 Io C 1 laop .......... o ,o lov Ip O% � to ImU pa 2 aF o Ip 0 1 liop 1 1 I 1 1 iov o 0 a �� o iE E o to xa Ip .Y - v U N O o ry N I 0 0 O Z o Io Io 0 o I I I w to v d lop OM 2 Mo to no U to I 0 a a U Ip m to m O to F � I N d M a � jpo w N to 2 I I M� Io9 a� is 1 1 �N to m� to wa 0 �o 0 1 d N F N � ti a I I 1 4 Io C �� Ip �o aF o Ip 0 1 v to a �� Ip to xa Ip N O ;p. 1 I wa � 1 � au O ov 1 oc b1 N p 1 No I M M O U I I 0 I 0 I x U n I Z N I I I I I Ip O io � Ip � I v m o. � o 'a O .O 'P 0 n U 1 O 1 o O y I to o I I to Io �a Ip to 0 w oa P z I o I c� foo ion � o �o �000 0 ✓1 Ioa ON wa M 10 IO o0 V ciN F O to .- ato IM to I� n O I I � 1 I 1 p I U .- o to IM ti 0 0 n n O Io I I� I o d1^ �0 0 00 0 a o 0 �`0 0 N m O N tfG0 �F n U 1 O 1 o O y U N 10 IyOjo �a o Io I I I. Iv lo< 0 w oa P z IN �i �N � O o l0 Io 0 ✓1 Ioa ON wa M io I Ip i� 1 IOP o0 V ciN F O to loo 00 lid 0 to IP vo � I I Ip I p o- U a t to l0 to 10 ti to lino o d1^ 0 I �`0 I 10o ' OM om xa I iso o to0 Imo 0 0 W T o la to I m O jo '4 to 0o to Iv IoM ti M LLd I� I o I� o o 10 j o I o0 1.- i v 1 Oo 0 0 00 �� 0 10 l0 0 o 0 O I 1 o INo I v No u OM 0 U o 10 10 mo 00 o o to I I I o I Io Im Imo I I, v IOP loo ry oP 00 O z O U Im o to I m to O Z I io 1 iv e O o K IMa e to to b� � z 10 I to 1<o a N U � - � ~ U I .> N m O i o n n U I o to Ioo 00 U N Oo Io 0 Z o Io I I I. Iv lo< 0 w oa P z IN �i g o i M M N O U oo In M ip O N N F �N I _ o IM NO U m �N � I --__ 0 0 NO U 0 o e m o • I �`0 I 10o ' OM {tel~ I iso ^o I I, 2N 2m to o E m O Wd ifo I 0 j In N LLd I o I� oig d2 mi' 1` jao 0 00 �� Ino no WO. o jo I Iv o �o N O ioo IM I I h h O U Im o to I m to O Z Io I I I IMa e � I � M I N U � - � ~ U ;O a` N N M O N O LU W W m U c O N N 0 O LU W W FU U ER N m O o 0 U ;N O o io 0 0 0 O U to l0 loco o Z I to I 1 I to Id l0 10� w < Z g 10 o o� U l o 0 vo M a r o to Im m M g 1 io o O U 0 O o N m 0 - o to l0 to IN r Z IrI 1 �O N U U to IN p m to to o m 10 Iry I I Z I U O 00 IMO o0 mO ' 00 ,�c� w a 0 In I .- I I ..}.. .} • I I �N Cj I O I N ti h� 0 o� aF io imo mo I� I 00 10 IO 10 I I '^o NN o iso 0 100 wa O. I I I I 0 i0 1O0 00 QO WLL l0 1.- I I to l0 l0 100 0 yvl N rna I I to I I 00 h0 O 10 Ino to I� Oa LL I I to I� to l0 u 0 ocq O Im to U to I I m Io U I INo I 1 10 loo N �o 0 N� to loo 000 KA.. Y� o W 10 IN N _� 10 10 0M 0 o - to Imo Lqo LLa I IN o I o I v N N N O to loo I loo 00 10 IM I I I 1 to Imo' v O iQ io 0 c U I Io I I �o IoM o OX 10 lyo Vo Z 0 to loo I I 1 I Ii " io iov 0 oa O to Ir I ------------ ri ER N m O ui I O o io to I Iv Iry oa Z U loco o 0 no o IN N g I O IN M a r I Iry M M N O U o 0 0o jN m Z 1 �O N m O I N� IMO o0 I I w o loo IMo ' 00 ,�c� w a 0 In I .- I I no �N Cj LL LL I I 0 10 0 o� aF I� I 00 10 IO 0 '^o o iso no wa O. I I I I r d o Z r w° I I to v O joo Oa � I In I I Iti � O Im to U to I I m m U l0 0 Z 10 i ^ to w U 0 IM I N 0 o - U O Q N N M O N a O 2i W W_ lb U 0 0 0 W W w U 0 d U m 0 N 1 I oN o l0 to a i s i o 10 Ip I I io ib Im Io b o�n d 2 U o to to o 0 IT ic' Imo of ~ i is im � N O o o Io l0 I Iry 0 Io I I I O 10 Ian I ON U � N O m la l0 0 O to IN N Z 1 1 •O O F- � O F I N ;N I b NO vo Ipo 1 IOp 61- 10 Imo Od 10 IM I I b NN o ib iO N — Im X4 to loo _ 10 I � W �Q LN N Olg I m 1 0 0 o V 1+ 4 Ip Ino I I io o i o i v �� q^2 im iao vo q I I ul O 10 O 1 I N I I Ip 'per N o I p p ip imp o= xa W T o o Ip IN I Ii Im v 0 10 Im Np d 0 Zp aN N O li4 d@ j0 jN0 I 1 1 l0 Iv 0p o O LL4 m o 0 0 to 7 p p o O p 0 Ip IM I I 1 I 0 o of c p m p I o 1 0 Im I U o to Io o to to 1 I ----ir ---%---- io jw p � o x O Io Im"' l0 1� I I I I o po oa 0 0 1 O I o O � 10 l0 op o 1 In I 1 n O "o a Y m N �N e s O m Io U o to I N O g m IN N F- F N O N ;N b vo Ipo m I iO N — � IN �Q q^2 O 10 IL 4 o I p aN N 1 iN d@ 1 m I m LL4 0 to p m I o 1 0 w° O v0 N �N Im LLa IM O I� ;m N o to I Q U Ucc o o Y d ; N 0 = N IM __..h ..._ m N Qi O 1 N I N ro Im rL O v U m E � d N N M O N 0 c0 G LU _W m U O 0 O W W (0 U ' rz O Y E 0 O C CL d >1 T F— CL Q H M V N O M N m W co U I T on N N M O N 0 0 13W W m U 0 N 0 W _W m U v M s O U p m m OZ to 0 v om a IOo o o to Imo I rvo I i m v O 10 l0 10 U O 10 Ipm 0 0 I O o 0 to I to lao In �a ,ri Im U p o try m o Ip F !r h N U V o o t o I m In o to IN �N O Ip I� I N p U o 0 0 0 m o I I N 10 I N p. 0 10 IN IN Io I� p i� iry I.- o to Wa; o ;o iop Io 1 I I I I mm I I j I � a LL� I 1 I I o �: to IN IN �'o to Ip to tp i aF-' 0 I I tg to la io xa' w T p Ip I Ip I ___r---- __.._ 10 ---- I t I Iv I� Oo° lov �' i iop,p Ipo Im I I I Im I I Im m U, U I to I i to I �a i I , I I x w , z z I I P t� I� Io , 0 I I I I I 17 - Im �° (DI I Ifo to � I I to I to I � • U N • () v r U N fc (1 W� wE :vim � Z 'Zn N N M O N a O w W W U c O 0 Lu Lu W U N t Lc; 2 q N O O O U ? 0 0 O 0 � o N Z � a o 0 2 U 0 U O m 0 0 S 0 0 F, a av w: 0 v s 3 m � F 0 U N N M O N a 0 2b W W U 0 0 2i W W m U m +- N E d O O 0 O o o U o N M 1 O 0 o0 O Z o Id 2 V 0 �a g Y 1 V O 2 U 1 a o IN -h N O m im Oo U 'm o 0 I� o 0 b m` i D N 1I _1 - m N iq W= x � W wa o to N 'o 1 �N m� N s �n � 3 � 0 o v o J v r a i o to [F 0 U ;a s U :v ' o N M 1 O I 2 V 0 �a Y 1 1 .Ip o F IN -h N O m im z I� b m` i N 1I _1 - N iq � b r 1 wa o to N 1 �N m� �n o� �o �2 a i o to mcg m 1t0 wa N � li a v iv NO o0 0 ; o i� -h N 1 �V ---hN- � is Z 10 ry Z Iry � m o v m m - N N M N a 0 LU w o FU rn U ra o ..0 N > N T p O m N � N N LU ` LU Q m � U N � .o v s O Ip to to oN Z o p to Iro o Ip mo /. a to Imp I I 1 to I U 0 to Ip lo?0 0 � Ip 10 Iry T � I is im im O U to Ian jp l0 I IN I I l0 1� 1 Im e N O U to Ir ly .- d to IN Ir o m... Ip In I In IN I m Z I 1 �p 1 U a N « o 'o "" 100 � a Ip to I 1 lo; 1 �`V'y Ip IN lon V s� to I.- Ico I I I I rn� I I 1 LLd I I I I I to IN I I lon v om go to Ir. Ico tO I I I 1 m to Ir Ico wa .m a 0 io io I____tr ___1,____ I I I I ioS 1 I 0 oa LL 1 1 I 1 I Iv I I�M I I 1 to 1 v N O rvp r� 1 lop I i I I c i to loo Im I In n � r---- r ---- ie I____ iv N � I to I I to 1 O IN Ian to N � to Ip I I to 1 m m � Q 'U N :t m 2 N O O W U I O O W W U •O •N V O U 0 0 Io loo Io 0 �o N Z o to Im Io Imo I I to Im O o I 1� 10 Io 1 to IpM m Q Q = U iM o to to IMp o 1 IM o Ip 10 I ' Imp Iry O N N O � m m o I Id IN Io Im II____ o Ip 1. I 1 Im w N U o O I O N O lIM I N Z Ia iM I I 0 r I o M n ON U 0 •o � 'p M m O � •O Ipo C a r o o o �y m o Io to 1 I I Im �5 O to IN IpM Q W I I 1 1 I 1 1 im I I jin I I I LLn ' o o I I 1 I to Im Io Iul 1 I I� loo°' m m p q dN ci 0 p o Ito 1 I jo jN Im I IoM 0 a 6� ua p ip i� iCI W O 0 I I 1 0 rn� 1 I I LL6 1 I I 1 I 1 IoM 1 1 I loin • OM N 0 i i�� iop no 11m 1 I I I I I� I IQ 1 to IN � O U 1 Io I' I I� I I IW In 1' IQ IQ.. N oQ � I IM I to Ip l0 0 1 Io I 1 I I N IM I Ip I 1 I 1N p N O 15 Iumi IVMi to Io to to r I I t I I I p N c_ O v N '; V • C q U ry v m 2 v god a p ti z t'n ¢ • �' m O W V I ,M N 1 m O no ;oro U iLo 1 N O iM m 1 IM f 1 z � m m E N N O N 0 cO G W W R U c O O 0 cO G W W U N C +R+ N Q Y O 00 h v m M A b O r e - U N O off �n Z ro F _ _ a m Z n M U N O U a' q M Q H F as 5 m' O� m �m ca c o 0 � t 3 m O � � h J `o U +R+ N Q Y O 00 N N ON Z ro r g a 2 a v U N O I - 5w O� m �m ca 0 N � O � � h J O 0 U +R+ N Q Y O 00 N N M O N 0 w W W (D U O N a O 2E W W U v Q N O o V o C "rM Q I Q Z P 10 g - ho - P Im j Z Im I p' "h 0 N N N IN o P I N U N O v O1 N O 0 - o U 6 P � M O N c Z T P N U N O M U l4 N QN F - v v N O Z N O P O 0 � O q m o a U N N M O N O LU W W U c 0 O 0 W W U 0 N eo 2 v N m 0 U v a c o D 0 o 0 0 N � N U OU N ry N N O h m„ my a �p o n w s om r v o J a `o U N N M O N 0 O 2i W W m U 0 N a O W W m U v � O o U a O 2 o Z U a O o v m m � E U � N N C O m N Ci Appendix E Updated Drainage Study / Water Quality Management Plan, February, 2015 Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan A Template for Projects located within the Santa Ana Watershed Region of Riverside County Project Title: LAKE VIEW VILLAGE Development No: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 33267 Design Review/Case No: 1467 ® Preliminary ❑ Final Original Date Prepared: December 2013 Revision Date(s): February 2015 Prepared for Compliance with Regionoleoord Order No. R8-2010-0033 1 Contact Information: Prepared for: Sunwood Ventures, 9740 Appaloosa Rd, Suite 130, San Diego, CA 92131 Prepared by: Roger T. Chung, P.E., VA Consulting, Inc., 46 Discovery, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92618, 949-474-1400 a l ( Now, � T �u v� uaa ® Preliminary ❑ Final Original Date Prepared: December 2013 Revision Date(s): February 2015 Prepared for Compliance with Regionoleoord Order No. R8-2010-0033 1 Contact Information: Prepared for: Sunwood Ventures, 9740 Appaloosa Rd, Suite 130, San Diego, CA 92131 Prepared by: Roger T. Chung, P.E., VA Consulting, Inc., 46 Discovery, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92618, 949-474-1400 A Brief Introduction This Project -Specific WQMP Template for the Santa Ana Region has been prepared to help guide you in documenting compliance for your project. Because this document has been designed to specifically document compliance, you will need to utilize the WQMP Guidance Document as your "how-to" manual to help guide you through this process. Both the Template and Guidance Document go hand-in-hand, and will help facilitate a well prepared Project -Specific WQMP. Below is a flowchart for the layout of this Template that will provide the steps required to document compliance. OWNER'S CERTIFICATION This Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for Sunwood Ventures by Roger T. Chung, P.E. for the Lake View Village project. This WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of City of Lake Elsinore for Ordinance No.1296 which includes the requirement for the preparation and implementation of a Project -Specific WQMP. The undersigned, while owning the property/project described in the preceding paragraph, shall be responsible for the implementation and funding of this WQMP and will ensure that this WQMP is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site. In addition, the property owner accepts responsibility for interim operation and maintenance of Stormwater BMPs until such time as this responsibility is formally transferred to a subsequent owner. This WQMP will be reviewed with the facility operator, facility supervisors, employees, tenants, maintenance and service contractors, or any other party for parties) having responsibility for implementing portions of this WQMP. At least one copy of this WQMP will be maintained at the project site or project office in perpetuity. The undersigned is authorized to certify and to approve implementation of this WQMP. The undersigned is aware that implementation of this WQMP is enforceable under City lofLake Elsinore Water Quality Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 14.08.020). "I, the undersigned, certify under penalty of law that the provisions of this WQMP have been reviewed and accepted and that the WQMP will be transferred to future successors in interest." Owner's Signature Owner's Printed Name PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION Date Owner's Title/Position "The selection, sizing and design of stormwater treatment and other stormwater quality and quantity control measures in this plan meet the requirements of Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 118-2010-0033 and any subsequent amendments thereto." Preparer's Signature Roger T. Chung P.E. Preparer's Printed Name Preparer's Licensure: 2/19/15 Date Project Manager Preparer's Title/Position Table of Contents Section A: Project and Site Information...................................................................................................6 A.1 Maps and Site Plans.......................................................................................................................6 A.2 Identify Receiving Waters..............................................................................................................7 A.3 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: ....................................................... .......... 7 Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles)..................................................................................9 Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas(DMAs)....................................................................11 Section D: Implement LID BMPs.............................................................................................................13 D.1 Infiltration Applicability...............................................................................................................13 D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment.......................................................................................................14 D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment.................................................................................16 D.4 Feasibility Assessment Summaries...............................................................................................17 D.5 LID BMP Sizing— .... ................................. ........................................ .................................... ..... 18 Section E: Alternative Compliance (LID Waiver Program).......................................................................19 E.1 Identify Pollutants of Concern......................................................................................................20 E.2 Stormwater Credits......................................................................................................................21 E.3 Sizing Criteria...............................................................................................................................21 E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection................................................................................................22 SectionF: Hydromodification.................................................................................................................23 F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Analysis.......................................................................23 F.2 HCOC Mitigation..........................................................................................................................24 Section G: Source Control BMPs............................................................................................................25 Section H: Construction Plan Checklist...................................................................................................27 Section I: Operation, Maintenance and Funding....................................................................................28 List of Tables Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters............................................................................................7 Maps and Site Plans...........................................................................................................29 Table A.2 Other Applicable Permits.........................................................................................................7 Appendix 2: TableC.1 DMA Classifications................................................................................................................11 .......................... ........................ 30 Table C.2 Type 'A', Self -Treating Areas...................................................................................................11 Soils Information................................................................................................................31 Table C.3 Type '13', Self -Retaining Areas.................................................................................................11 Appendix 4: Table C.4 Type 'C', Areas that Drain to Self -Retaining Areas...................................................................12 Table C.5 Type 'D', Areas Draining to BMPs...........................................................................................12 LID Infeasibility...................................................................................................................33 Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility.............................................................................................................13 Appendix6: Table D.2 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix..........................................................................................17 Table D.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs...............................................................................................18 Hydromodification.............................................................................................................35 Table E.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type....................................................................................20 Appendix8: TableE.2 Water Quality Credits.............................................................................................................21 Table E.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizing................................................................................................21 O&M............................................................................................................................... Table E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection..........................................................................................22 Appendix 10: Table F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Summary...........................................................................23 .. . . ... ................................. . 38 - Table G.1 Permanent and Operational Source Control Measures...........................................................25 Conditions of Approval ...... ..................... ............ ......... ..... Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference.........................................................................................27 List of Appendices Appendix 1: I. Maps and Site Plans...........................................................................................................29 Appendix 2: Construction Plans_ ...................................................... .......................... ........................ 30 Appendix 3: Soils Information................................................................................................................31 Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions...................................................................................................32 Appendix5: LID Infeasibility...................................................................................................................33 Appendix6: BMP Design Details............................................................................................................34 Appendix7: Hydromodification.............................................................................................................35 Appendix8: Source Control...................................................................................................................36 Appendix9: O&M............................................................................................................................... 37 - Appendix 10: Educational Materials., ............... _ ............ .................... .. . . ... ................................. . 38 - Appendix 11: Conditions of Approval ...... ..................... ............ ......... ..... ............ ......... ....................... - 39- 9 - I. Section A: Project and Site Information PROJECT INFORMATION Type of Project: Residential Planning Area: N/A Community Name: Lake View Village Development Name: Lake View Village PROJECT LOCATION Latitude & Longitude (DMS): 33`39'58.46"N 117°23'3.97"W Project Watershed and Sub -Watershed: Santa Ana Watershed, Elsinore Valley, Elsinore APN(s): 3790500343 Map Book and Page No.: THOMAS BROS. MAPS, PAGE: 865, GRID: G6, ILLS, H6 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Proposed or Potential Land Use(s) Proposed or Potential SIC Code(s) Area of Impervious Project Footprint (SF) Total Area of proposed Impervious Surfaces within the Project Limits (SF)/or Replacement Does the project consist of offsite road improvements? Does the project propose to construct unpaved roads? Is the project part of a larger common plan of development (phased project)? EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS Total area of existing Impervious Surfaces within the project limits (SF) Is the project located within any MSHCP Criteria Cell? If so, identify the Cell number: Are there any natural hydrologic features on the project site? Is a Geotechnical Report attached? If no Geotech. Report, list the N RCS soils type(s) present on the site (A, B, C and/or D) What is the Water Quality Design Storm Depth for the project? A.1 Maps and Site Plans Multi -Family Homes 1522 796712.40 733691.20 D ®N ❑Y ON ❑Y ®N 0 ❑Y ®N ❑Y ®N ®Y El 0.93 IN When completing your Project -Specific WQMP, include a map of the local vicinity and existing site. In addition, include all grading, drainage, landscape/plant palette and other pertinent construction plans in Appendix 2. At a minimum, your WQMP Site Plan should include the following: • Drainage Management Areas • Proposed Structural BMPs • Drainage Path • Drainage Infrastructure, Inlets, Overflows • Source Control BMPs • Buildings, Roof Lines, Downspouts • Impervious Surfaces • Standard Labeling Use your discretion on whether or not you may need to create multiple sheets or can appropriately accommodate these features on one or two sheets. Keep in mind that the Co -Permittee plan reviewer must be able to easily analyze your project utilizing this template and its associated site plans and maps. 6 A.2 Identify Receiving Waters Using Table A.1 below, list in order of upstream to downstream, the receiving waters that the project site is tributary to. Continue to fill each row with the Receiving Water's 303(d) listed impairments (if any), designated beneficial uses, and proximity, if any, to a RARE beneficial use. Include a map of the receiving waters in Appendix 1. Table A.1 Identification of Receivin¢ Waters Receiving Permit Required Designated - Proximity to RARE ® N EPA Approved 303(d) List Impairments ❑ Y ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ N Waters ❑ Y Beneficial Uses Beneficial Use '.. ® Y Nutrients, Organic Enrichment/Low Dissolved Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage ❑ Y Lake Elsinore Oxygen, PCBs, Sediment Toxicity, Unknown REC 1, REC 2, WARM & LAKE ELSINORE DOES NOT'. . Toxicity WILD INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek ._ Indicator Bacteria REC 1, REC 2, WARM, WILD TEMESCAL CREEK REACH 6 DOES Reach &GWR NOT INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek None REC 1, REC 2, WARM, WILD, PROJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 2.83 Reach RARE, AGR &GWR MILES TO RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek None REC I, REC 2, WARM, WILD, PROJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 7.82 Reach4 RARE, AGR &GWR MILES TO RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek None REC 1, REC 2, WARM, WILD, TEMESCAL CREEK REACH 3 DOES Reach IND, AGR &GWR NOT INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek None REC S, REC 2, WARM, WILD, TEMESCAL REACH 2 DOES NOT Reach IND, AGR&GWR INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal CreekpH WARM &WILD TEMESCAL CREEK REACH 1B DOES Reach 18 NOT INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Temescal Creek TEMESCAL CREEK REACH 1A DOES Reach 1A PH REC 2WARM &WILD , NOT INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Santa Ana River REC 1, REC 2, WARM, WILD, PROJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY Reach Copper, Lead, Pathogens 23.82 MILES TO RARE BENEFICIAL SPWN, RARE, AGR &GWR USE Santa Ana River RCC 1, REC 2, WARM, WILD, PROJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY Reach 2 Indicator Bacteria RARE, AGR & GWR 26.15 MILES TO RARE BENEFICIAL USE Santa Ana River None REC 1, REC 2, WARM & SANTA ANA RIVER REACH 1 DOES Reach I WILD NOT INCLUDE RARE BENEFICIAL USE Tidal Prism of None REC I, REC 2, COMM, WILD, PROJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 55 Santa Ana River RARE & MAR MILES TO RARE BENEFICIAL USE A.3 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: Table A.2 Other Aonlicable Permits Agency Permit Required State Department of Fish and Game, 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement ❑ Y ® N State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Cert. US Army Corps of Engineers, CWA Section 404 Permit ❑ Y ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ N US Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species Act Section 7 Biological Opinion ❑ Y ® N Statewide Construction General Permit Coverage ® Y ❑ N Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage ❑ Y ® N Western Riverside MSHCP Consistency Approval (e.g., JPR, DBESP) ❑ Y © N 7 11 11 - -] E] Y n__7 Other (please list in the space below as required) If yes is answered to any of the questions above, the Co -Permittee may require proof of approval/coverage from those agencies as applicable including documentation of any associated requirements that may affect this Project -Specific WQMP. H Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles) Review of the information collected in Section 'A' will aid in identifying the principal constraints on site design and selection of LID BMPs as well as opportunities to reduce imperviousness and incorporate LID Principles into the site and landscape design. For example, constraints might include impermeable soils, high groundwater, groundwater pollution or contaminated soils, steep slopes, geotechnical instability, high-intensity land use, heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic, utility locations or safety concerns, opportunities might include existing natural areas, low areas, oddly configured or otherwise unbuildable parcels, easements and landscape amenities including open space and buffers (which can double as locations for bioretention BMPs), and differences in elevation (which can provide hydraulic head). Prepare a brief narrative for each of the site optimization strategies described below. This narrative will help you as you proceed with your LID design and explain your design decisions to others. The 2010 Santa Ana MS4 Permit further requires that LID Retention BMPs (Infiltration Only or Harvest and Use) be used unless it can be shown that those BMPs are infeasible. Therefore, it is important that your narrative identify and justify if there are any constraints that would prevent the use of those categories of LID BMPs. Similarly, you should also note opportunities that exist which will be utilized during project design. Upon completion of identifying Constraints and Opportunities, include these on your WQMP Site plan in Appendix 1. Site Optimization The following questions are based upon Section 3.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Review of the WQMP Guidance Document will help you determine how best to optimize your site and subsequently identify opportunities and/or constraints, and document compliance. Did you identify and preserve existing drainage patterns? If so, how? If not, why? Under Pre -Project condition, storm runoff sheet flows from southwest to northeast corner of the site and enters a ditch located along the south boundary of the site. The drainage ditch flows northeast to existing CMP located at the northeast corner of the project site and discharges to South Riverside Channel. In the Post -Project condition, the drainage pattern will remain the same and will flow into the storm drain system that will discharge into the proposed water quality basin located in the northeast corner of the project site. Did you identify and protect existing vegetation? If so, how? If not, why? All brush, vegetation and debris shall be removed or piled and otherwise disposed of in preparation of areas to be filled. Did you identify and preserve natural infiltration capacity? If so, how? If not, why? The proposed condition will include the 336 residential units, typical street sections, catch basins, and one storm drain line sized to collect the 100 -year storm flows. With the increase of impervious areas, the infiltration areas for storm water will decrease. Did you identify and minimize impervious area? If so, how? If not, why? 9 The impervious areas located within the project site will consist of 336 residential units and the streets within the tract. Did you identify and disperse runoff to adjacent pervious areas? If so, how? If not, why? The proposed condition will include the typical street sections, catch basins, and one storm drain line sized to collect the 100 -year storm flows and eventually discharge into the water quality basin. 10 Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) Utilizing the procedure in Section 3.3 of the WQMP Guidance Document which discusses the methods of delineating and mapping your project site into individual DMAs, complete Table C.1 below to appropriately categorize the types of classification (e.g., Type A, Type B, etc.) per DMA for your project site. Upon completion of this table, this information will then be used to populate and tabulate the corresponding tables for their respective DMA classifications. Table CA DMA Classifications DMA Name or to Surface Type(s)' Area (Sq. Ft.) DMA "type AREA A Roofs/Concrete 665489.65 TYPE D PLAYGROUND Concrete/Ornamental Landscaping 10341.24 TYPE B/C RECREATIONALAREA Concrete/Ornamental Landscaping 24150.14 TYPEB/C AREA B Concrete 10890.00 TYPE D AREA C Roofs/Concrete 76230.00 TYPE D n�rrcme , ome o-1 rn uie vvuiwr ouraance uocument to popuiate tars column i ame L.L i ype -A, �eIT- i rearing Areas DMA Name or ID Area.(Sq Ft) Stabilization Type Irrigation Type (if any) 1 Table C.3 Type'B', Self -Retaining Areas Self -Retaining Area Area .. Storm (square Depth TDMAfeet) (Inches) Pnat-n rniart .— ID jsurface type J[A] JIB] 1110 pe 'C' DMAs that are draining to the Self -Retaining ea j ,[C] from Table /iC 'Required Retention Depth 7A Name I--_ _---'Required . PLAYGROUND ORNAMENTAL 5823.80 0.93 PLND/198767 LANDSCAPING IMPERVIOU' RECREATIONAL ORNAMENTAL RECREATIO NAq AYGROU AREA LANDSCAPING 11761.04 0.93 AREA/ 6318.44 IMPERVIOUS 41 11 Table C.4 Type'C', Areas that Drain to Self -Retaining Areas TDMA Receiving Self -Retaining DMA i m o v v m Lo v a o. o rea (square z a o. '� Product �c et) Ratio CI [A] V o 4' [61 ,.... (C1 IA1 x(61 DMA name/ID fD� 1[C]/[D]- w-.>. .. _N-- . _ PLAYGROUND/ 4517.44 :PLAYGROUND 0.44 1987.67 PLAYGROUND 5823.80 0.34<2 IMPERVIOUS RECREATIO NAL 12389.1 RECREATIONA 0.51 6318.44 RECREATIONAL 11761.04 0.54<2 AREA/ AREA AREA IMPERVIOUS I...e L., Iypt, V III, LV OIVIII DMA Name or ID I BMP Name or ID - AREA A WATER QUALITY BASIN VIA CATCH BASIN AREA B FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL VIA CATCH BASIN AREA C WATER QUALITY BASIN VIA CATCH BASIN Note: More than one drainage management area can drain to a single LID OMP, however, one drainage management area may not drain to more than one BMP. 12 Section D: Implement LID BMPs DA Infiltration Applicability Is there an approved downstream 'Highest and Best Use' for stormwater runoff (see discussion in Chapter2.4.4 ofthe WQMP Guidance Document for further details)? ®Y ❑N If yes has been checked, Infiltration BM Ps shall not be used for the site. If no, continue working through this section to implement your LID BMPs. It is recommended that you contact your Co -Permittee to verify whether or not your project discharges to an approved downstream 'Highest and Best Use' feature. Geotechnical Report A Geotechnical Report or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment may be required by the Copermittee to confirm present and past site characteristics that may affect the use of Infiltration BMPs. In addition, the Co -Permittee, at their discretion, may not require a geotechnical report for small projects as described in Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. If a geotechnical report has been prepared, include it in Appendix 3. In addition, if a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared, include it in Appendix 4. Is this project classified as a small project consistent with the requirements of Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document? ❑ Y ❑ N Infiltration Feasibility Table D.1 below is meant to provide a simple means of assessing which DMAs on your site support Infiltration BMPs and is discussed in the WQMP Guidance Document in Chapter 2.4.5. Check the appropriate box for each question and then list affected DMAS as applicable. If additional space is needed, add a row below the corresponding answer. Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility Does the project site... YES No ...have any DMAs with a seasonal high groundwater mark shallower than 10 feet? x If Yes, list affected DMAs: AREA A, 8 & C ...have any DMAs located within 100 feet of a water supply wel l? x If Yes, list affected DMAs: AREA C ...have any areas identified by the geotechnical report as posing a public safety risk where infiltration of stormwater could have a negative impact? x If Yes, list affected DMAs: _ ...have measured in-situ infiltration rates of less than 1.6 inches / hour? x If Yes, list affected DMAs: AREA A ...have significant cut and/or fill conditions that would preclude in-situ testing of Infiltration rates at the final infiltration surface? X If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...geotechnical report identify other site-specific factors that would preclude effective and safe mfktration? x Describe here: If you answered "Yes" to any of the questions above for any DMA, Infiltration BMPs should not be used for those WAS and you should proceed to the assessment for Harvest and Use below. 13 D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment Please check what applies: ❑ Reclaimed water will be used for the non -potable water demands fort he project. ❑Downstream water rights may be impacted by Harvest and Use as approved by the Regional Board (verify with the Copermittee). ❑The Design Capture Volume will be addressed using Infiltration Only BMPs. In such a case, Harvest and Use BMPs are still encouraged, but it would not be required if the Design Capture Volume will be infiltrated or evapotranspired. If any of the above boxes have been checked, Harvest and Use BMPs need not be assessed forth e site. If neither of the above criteria applies, follow the steps below to assess the feasibility of irrigation use, toilet use and other non -potable uses (e.g., industrial use). Irrigation Use Feasibility Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for Irrigation Use BMPs on your site: Step 1: Identify the total area of irrigated landscape on the site, and the type of landscaping used. Total Area of Irrigated Landscape: N/A Type of Landscaping (Conservation Design or Active Turf): N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for irrigation use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A Step 3: Cross reference the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A of the WQMP Guidance Document) with the left column of Table 2-3 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum area of Effective Irrigated Area per Tributary Impervious Area (EIATIA). Enter your EIATIA factor: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum irrigated area that would be required. Minimum required irrigated area: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for irrigation use is feasible for the project by comparing the total area of irrigated landscape (Step 1) to the minimum required irrigated area (Step 4). Minimum required irrigated area (Step 4) I Available Irrigated N/A Toilet Use Feasibility 14 N/A Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing uses on your site: Step 1: Identify the projected total number of daily toilet users during the wet season, and account for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy: Projected Number of Daily Toilet Users: N/A Project Type: N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for toilet use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2-1 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum number or toilet users per tributary impervious acre (TUTIA). Enter your TUTIA factor: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum number of toilet users that would be required. Minimum number of toilet users: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing use is feasible for the project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). Minimum required Toilet Users (Step 4) ( Projected number of toilet users N/A N/A Other Non -Potable Use Feasibility Are there other non -potable uses for stormwater runoff on the site (e.g. industrial use)? See Chapter 2 of the Guidance for further information. If yes, describe below. If no, write N/A. N/A Step 1: Identify the projected average daily non -potable demand, in gallons per day, during the wet season and accounting for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy or operation. Average Daily Demand: N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for the identified non -potable use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A 15 Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2-3 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum demand for non -potable uses per tributary impervious acre. Enter the factor from Table 2-3: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 4 by the total of impervious areas from Step 3 to develop the minimum number of gallons per day of non -potable use that would be required. Minimum required use: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for other non -potable use is feasible for the project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). Minimum reauired non -potable use (Step 4) 1 Proiected average daily use N/A I N/A If Irrigation, Toilet and Other Use feasibility anticipated demands are less than the applicable minimum values, Harvest and Use BMPs are not required and you should proceed to utilize LID Bioretention and Biotreatment, unless a site-specific analysis has been completed that demonstrates technical infeasibility as noted in D.3 below. D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment Other LID Bioretention and Biotreatment BMPs as described in Chapter 2.4.7 of the WQMP Guidance Document are feasible on nearly all development sites with sufficient advance planning. Select one of the following: M LID Bioretention/Biotreatment BMPs will be used for some or all DMAs of the project as noted below in Section D.4 (note the requirements of Section 3.4.2 in the WQMP Guidance Document). ❑ A site-specific analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of all LID BMPs has been performed and is included in Appendix 5. If you plan to submit an analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of LID BMPs, request a pre -submittal meeting with the Copermittee to discuss this option. Proceed to Section E to document your alternative compliance measures. 16 D.4 Feasibility Assessment Summaries From the Infiltration, Harvest and Use, Bioretention and Biotreatment Sections above, complete Table D.2 below to summarize which LID BMPs are technically feasible, and which are not, based upon the established hierarchy. Table D.2 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix LID BMP Hierarchy No LID 'DMA Name/ID 1. Infiltration 2. Harvestand use 3 Bioretention 4. Biotreatment _.(Alternative Compliance) AREAA ❑ -B ❑ ❑ ® ❑ AREA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ®—.. AREA C ❑ _ El _ ® El_ _❑ ❑ ❑_ ❑ —... 11._ _. El El❑ ❑ ❑ .. For those DMAs where LID BMPs are not feasible, provide a brief narrative below summarizing why they are not feasible, include your technical infeasibility criteria in Appendix 5, and proceed to Section E below to document Alternative Compliance measures for those DMAs. Recall that each proposed DMA must pass through the LID BMP hierarchy before alternative compliance measures may be considered. Runoff from Area B will drain offsite to catch basin that will discharge into the flood channel. 17 D.5 LID BMP Sizing Each LID BMP must be designed to ensure that the Design Capture Volume will be addressed by the selected BMPs. First, calculate the Design Capture Volume for each LID BMP using the V,, worksheet in Appendix F of the LID BMP Design Handbook. Second, design the LID BMP to meet the required V,M, using a method approved by the Copermittee. Utilize the worksheets found in the LID BMP Design Handbook or consult with your Copermittee to assist you in correctly sizing your LID BMPs. Complete Table D3 below to document the Design Capture Volume and the Proposed Volume for each LID BMP. Provide the completed design procedure sheets for each LID BMP in Appendix 6. You may add additional rows to the table below as needed. Table D.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs [B], [C] is obtained as described in Section 2.3.1 of the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit in the WQMP Guidance Document [G) is obtained from a design procedure sheet, such as in LID BMP Design Handbook and placed in Appendix 6 M DMA Effective Areas DMA Impervi DMA x Area ous Runof Runof DMA - (square Post -Project Fraction f f Enter BMP Name/ Identifier Here Type/ID feet) ` Surface Type , If Factor factor --.. _...- [Aj ___ ___. ..... (gj __. [Cj [A) x WATER QUALITY BASIN [C] AREA A 665489. ROOF/CONCRETE 1.00 0.892 5936 '. 65 16.77 AREA C 76230. ROOF/CONCRETE 1.00 0.892 6799 00 7.16 Propose — --- -------- _— — ______.. ...._..... Desig d.. n Volume i Storm Design Capture on Plans -- _._--- ..-_.__ ________. _.__._ — Depth Volume, V,,, (cubic (in) (cubic feeYJ 1[5) [Dlx[E] AT [Ej [F] — [C] F[A] 74171 9.65 666161 0.93 1Z 54885.6 3.93 51275.08 [B], [C] is obtained as described in Section 2.3.1 of the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit in the WQMP Guidance Document [G) is obtained from a design procedure sheet, such as in LID BMP Design Handbook and placed in Appendix 6 M Section E: Alternative Compliance (LID Waiver Program) LID BMPs are expected to be feasible on virtually all projects. Where LID BMPs have been demonstrated to be infeasible as documented in Section D, other Treatment Control BMPs must be used (subject to LID waiver approval by the Copermittee). Check one of the following Boxes: El LID Principles and LID BMPs have been incorporated into the site design to fully address all Drainage Management Areas. No alternative compliance measures are required for this project and thus this Section is not required to be completed. - Or - N The following Drainage Management Areas are unable to be addressed using LID BMPs. A site-specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of LID BMPs has been approved by the Co -Permittee and included in Appendix 5. Additionally, no downstream regional and/or sub - regional LID BMPs exist or are available for use by the project. The following alternative compliance measures on the following pages are being implemented to ensure that any pollutant loads expected to be discharged by not incorporating LID BMPs, are fully mitigated. Runoff from Area B will drain offsite to catch basin that will discharge into the flood channel. 19 EA Identify Pollutants of Concern Utilizing Table A.1 from Section A above which noted your project's receiving waters and their associated EPA approved 303(d) listed impairments, cross reference this information with that of your selected Priority Development Project Category in Table E.1 below. If the identified General Pollutant Categories are the same as those listed for your receiving waters, then these will be your Pollutants of Concern and the appropriate box or boxes will be checked on the last row. The purpose of this is to document compliance and to help you appropriately plan for mitigating your Pollutants of Concern in lieu of implementing LID BMPs. TAMP F.7. Pntontiml Pollutants by Land Ilse Tvne Priority Development General Pollutant Categories Project Categories and/or Toxic Project Features (check those Bacterial Metals Nutrients' Pesticides' Organic Sediments' Trash & Oil & that apply) Indicators ::. Compounds: Debris Grease ❑ Detached Residential P N P P N P P P Development ® Attached Residential P N P P N P P P(t) Development ❑ Commercial/Industrial Pi'i P Pill Pin Ptsl Pin P P Development ❑ Automotive Repair N P N N Pi4'5I N P P Shops ❑ Restaurants P N N N N N P P (15,000 ft') ❑ Hillside Development P N P P N P P P (>5,000 ft2) Lots L1 Pi6i P Fri) Pill p(4) Pill P P (>5,000 (>5,000 ft ) ❑ Retail Gasoline Outlets I N P N N P N P P Project Priority Pollutant(s) ®,.. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ of Concern .<. P = Potential N = Not Potential ... A potential Pollutant if non-native landscaping exists or is proposed onsite; otherwise not expected 'a A potential Pollutant if the project includes uncovered parking areas; otherwise not expected 13'A potential Pollutant is land use involving animal waste (al Specifically petroleum hydrocarbons 151 Specifically solvents 161 Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff 181 E.2 Stormwater Credits Projects that cannot implement LID 3MPs but nevertheless implement smart growth principles are potentially eligible for Stormwater Credits. Utilize Table 3-8 within the WQMP Guidance Document to identify your Project Category and its associated Water Quality Credit. If not applicable, write N/A. (able Bd Water Uuality Credits Qualifying Project Categories Credit Percentage' N/A _.._... Total Credit Percentage 'Cannot Exceed 50% 'Obtain corresponding data from Table 3-8 in the WQMP Guidance Document E.3 Sizing Criteria After you appropriately considered Stormwater Credits for your project, utilize Table E.3 below to appropriately size them to the DCV, or Design Flow Rate, as applicable. Please reference Chapter 3.5.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further information. Table E.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizing [B], [C] Is obtained as described In Section 2.3.1 from the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document [GI is for Flo. Based Treatment Control BMPs [GI = 43,560, for Volume -Based Control Treatment WES, [GI =12 [HI is from the Total Credit Percentage as Calculated from Table E2 above [I] as obtained from a design procedure sheet from the BMP manufacturer and should be Included In Appendix 6 21 DMA ` Post- '.- DMA Area Project Effective DMA Area x DMA ]square Surface ImperviousRunoff Runoff [Enter BMP Name/ Identifier Here Type/ID feet) Type Fraction, If '; Factor Factor [A] [R] [C] [A] x [C] Minimum- Proposed Design :..Volume --.--------- --.-.-.-...-- __---- �__-- — .I Capture Total Storm ,or .flow Design Volume or Water on Plans Storm Design Flow Credit %'. (cubic ------------- Depth i Rate (cubic Reduction feet or (in) feet orcfs) cfs) X[Aj F= [D] [F] X (1 -[HI) [El !,, [F] — --rG-1 IG] [I] [B], [C] Is obtained as described In Section 2.3.1 from the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document [GI is for Flo. Based Treatment Control BMPs [GI = 43,560, for Volume -Based Control Treatment WES, [GI =12 [HI is from the Total Credit Percentage as Calculated from Table E2 above [I] as obtained from a design procedure sheet from the BMP manufacturer and should be Included In Appendix 6 21 EA Treatment Control BMP Selection Treatment Control BMPs typically provide proprietary treatment mechanisms to treat potential pollutants in runoff, but do not sustain significant biological processes. Treatment Control BMPs must have a removal efficiency of a medium or high effectiveness as quantified below: High: equal to or greater than 80% removal efficiency Medium: between 40% and 80% removal efficiency Such removal efficiency documentation (e.g., studies, reports, etc.) as further discussed in Chapter 3.5.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document, must be included in Appendix 6. In addition, ensure that proposed Treatment Control BMPs are properly identified on the WQMP Site Plan in Appendix 1. Table E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection Selected Treatment Control BMP Name or ID' Priority Pollutant(s) of Concern to Mitigate' Removal Efficiency Percentage' N/A Treatment Control BMPs must not be constructed within Receiving Waters. In addition, a proposed Treatment Control BMP may be listed more than once if they possess more than one qualifying Pollutant removal efficiency. 2 Cross Reference Table E.1 above to populate this column. As documented in a Co Permittee Approved Study and provided in Appendix 6. 22 Section F: Hydromodification F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Analysis Once you have determined that the LID design is adequate to address water quality requirements, you will nead to assays if tha prnpnsed I ID Design may still create a HCOC. Review Chapters 2 and 3 (including Figure 3-7) of the WQMP Guidance Document to determine if your project must mitigate for Hydromodification impacts. If your project meets one of the following criteria which will be indicated by the check boxes below, you do not need to address Hydromodification at this time. However, if the project does not qualify for Exemptions 1, 2 or 3, then additional measures must be added to the design to comply with HCOC criteria. This is discussed in further detail below in Section F.2. HCOC EXEMPTION 1: The Priority Development Project disturbs less than one acre. The Copermittee has the discretion to require a Project -Specific WQMP to address HCOCs on projects less than one acre on a case by case basis. The disturbed area calculation should include all disturbances associated with larger common plans of development. Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? ❑ Y ❑ N If Yes, HCOC criteria do not apply. HCOC EXEMPTION 2: The volume and time of concentration' of storm water runoff for the post - development condition is not significantly different from the pre -development condition for a 2 -year return frequency storm (a difference of 5% or less is considered insignificant) using one of the following methods to calculate: • Riverside County Hydrology Manual Technical Release 55 (TR -55): Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (NRCS 1986), or derivatives thereof, such as the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method • Other methods acceptable to the Co -Permittee Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? ❑ Y ❑ N If Yes, report results in Table F.1 below and provide your substantiated hydrologic analysis in Appendix 7. Table F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Summary ' Time of concentration is defined as the time after the beginning of the rainfall when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing to flow at the outlet. 23 2 year - 24 hour Pre -condition Post -condition %Difference Time of Concentration N/A ------ ._.._----- N/A._ N/A Volume (Cubic Feet) N/A N/A N/A ' Time of concentration is defined as the time after the beginning of the rainfall when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing to flow at the outlet. 23 HCOC EXEMPTION 3: All downstream conveyance channels to an adequate sump (for example, Prado Dam, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Santa Ana River, or other lake, reservoir or naturally erosion resistant feature) that will receive runoff from the project are engineered and regularly maintained to ensure design flow capacity; no sensitive stream habitat areas will be adversely affected; or are not identified on the Co -Permittees Hydro modification Sensitivity Maps. Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? E Y ❑ N If Yes, HCOC criteria do not apply and note below which adequate sump applies to this HCOC qualifier: Lake Elsinore F.2 I Mitigation If none of the above HCOC Exemption Criteria are applicable, HCOC criteria is considered mitigated if they meet one of the following conditions: a. Additional LID BMPS are implemented onsite or offsite to mitigate potential erosion or habitat impacts as a result of HCOCs. This can be conducted by an evaluation of site-specific conditions utilizing accepted professional methodologies published by entities such as the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCRWP), or other Co -Permittee approved methodologies for site-specific HCOC analysis. b. The project is developed consistent with an approved Watershed Action Plan that addresses I in Receiving Waters. c. Mimicking the pre -development hydrograph with the post -development hydrograph, for a 2 - year return frequency storm. Generally, the hydrologic conditions of concern are not significant, if the post -development hydrograph is no more than 10% greater than pre -development hydrograph. In cases where excess volume cannot be infiltrated or captured and reused, discharge from the site must be limited to a flow rate no greater than 110% of the pre - development 2 -year peak flow. Be sure to include all pertinent documentation used in your analysis of the items a, b or c in Appendix 7. 24 Section G: Source Control BMPs Source control BMPs include permanent, structural features that may be required in your project plans — such as roofs over and berms around trash and recycling areas — and Operational BMPs, such as regular sweeping and "housekeeping", that must be implemented by the site's occupant or user. The MEP standard typically requires both types of BMPs. In general, Operational BMPs cannot be substituted for a feasible and effective permanent BMP. Using the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist in Appendix 8, review the following procedure to specify Source Control BMPs for your site: 1. Identify Pollutant Sources: Review Column 1 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Check off the potential sources of Pollutants that apply to your site. 2. Note Locations on Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit: Note the corresponding requirements listed in Column 2 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Show the location of each Pollutant source and each permanent Source Control BMP in your Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit located in Appendix 1. 3. Prepare a Table and Narrative: Check off the corresponding requirements listed in Column 3 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. In the left column of Table GA below, list each potential source of runoff Pollutants on your site (from those that you checked in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist). In the middle column, list the corresponding permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs (from Columns 2 and 3 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist) used to prevent Pollutants from entering runoff. Add additional narrative in this column that explains any special features, materials or methods of construction that will be used to implement these permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs. 4. Identify Operational Source Control BMPs: To complete your table, refer once again to the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. List in the right column of your table the Operational BMPs that should be implemented as long as the anticipated activities continue at the site. Copermittee stormwater ordinances require that applicable Source Control BMPs be implemented; the same BMPs may also be required as a condition of a use permit or other revocable Discretionary Approval for use of the site. Table G.1 Permanent and Operational Source Control Measures Potential Sources of Runoff pollutants Permanent Structural Source Control BMPs Operational Source Control BMPs On-site storm drain inlets Locate and mark all inlets with Maintain and periodically repaint the words "Only Rain Down the or replace inlet markings. Storm Drain" Provide stormwater pollution prevention information to new site, owners, lessees, or operators. See applicable operational BMPs in Fact Sheet SC -44, "Drainage System Maintenance," in the CASQA 25 26 Stormwater quality Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com. Include the following in lease agreements: "Tenant shall not allow anyone to discharge anything to storm drains or to store or deposit materials so as to create a potential discharge to storm drains." 26 Section H: Construction Plan Checklist Populate Table HA below to assist the plan checker in an expeditious review of your project. The first two columns will contain information that was prepared in previous steps, while the last column will be populated with the corresponding plan sheets. This table is to be completed with the submittal of your final Project -Specific WQMP. Table HA Construction Plan Cross-reference BMP No. or ID BMP .Identifier and Description Corresponding Plan Sheet(s) `. Water Quality Basin Extended Detention Basin To be submitted with final WQMP Note that the updated table — or Construction Plan WQMP Checklist — is only a reference tool to facilitate an easy comparison of the construction plans to your Project -Specific WQMP, Co -Permittee staff can advise you regarding the process required to propose changes to the approved Project -Specific W QM P. 27 Section I: Operation, Maintenance and Funding The Copermittee will periodically verify that Stormwater BMPs on your site are maintained and continue to operate as designed. To make this possible, your Copermittee will require that you include in Appendix 9 of this Project -Specific WQMP: 1. A means to finance and implement facility maintenance in perpetuity, including replacement cost. 2. Acceptance of responsibility for maintenance from the time the BMPs are constructed until responsibility for operation and maintenance is legally transferred. A warranty covering a period following construction may also be required. 3. An outline of general maintenance requirements for the Stormwater BMPs you have selected. 4. Figures delineating and designating pervious and impervious areas, location, and type of Stormwater BMP, and tables of pervious and impervious areas served by each facility. Geo - locating the BMPs using a coordinate system of latitude and longitude is recommended to help facilitate a future statewide database system. 5. A separate list and location of self-retaining areas or areas addressed by LID Principles that do not require specialized O&M or inspections but will require typical landscape maintenance as noted in Chapter 5, pages 85-86, in the WQMP Guidance. Include a brief description of typical landscape maintenance forthese areas. Your local Co -Permittee will also require that you prepare and submit a detailed Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan that sets forth a maintenance schedule for each of the Stormwater BMPs built on your site. An agreement assigning responsibility for maintenance and providing for inspections and certification may also be required. Details of these requirements and instructions for preparing a Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan are in Chapter 5 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Maintenance Mechanism: Maintenance Activities can be found in the Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility Frequency Matrix in Appendix 9. Will the proposed BMPs be maintained by a Home Owners' Association (HOA) or Property Owners Association (POA)? N El Include your Operation and Maintenance Plan and Maintenance Mechanism in Appendix 9. Additionally, include all pertinent forms of educational materials for those personnel that will be maintaining the proposed BMPs within this Project -Specific WQMP in Appendix 10. WR Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans Location Map, WQMP Site Plan and Receiving Waters Map 29 INTERSTATE 15 COLLIER AVE. v J LAKESHORE DR. d T LINCOLN T ST, 0 PROJECT CITY E SIGNORE E a LAKE SITE o ELSINORE ' GRAND AVE. LAGUNA AVE, w 3 of 0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. 0 U W N VICINITY MAP NTS CITY OF LAKE ELSNORE DATE VA Consulting, Inc. LAKE VIEW VLLAGE 10/13 /A• E,"GINEERS Etn Em suav Om TRACT NO. 33267 WNF' 926166 2 (919) 261-8182 F949) 47114W % °"s°`T "° VICINITY MAP 1 xr :,..\ni ri %t av ».Aoa., A>103-1. h U. mat, 1 t b" !- C o1, ams � � 5 a r nlr .n: nn n I At, ' 3f1N3AV ONVbO r ' 3f1N3AV ONVbO s Illy ty �b�dx, °pb tis � x 3 � ma2� H G ibL 2 5 L fid. rrvxre,x m }aF P"�"� Illy c � o c a �Z YJ ao C 4ma v � s� o 0 e m � ss � toy z a� oo�so � e E x e r J MOJNA r 11011111 _ a ex�� nuo ax o{o veuowvon� .�. I a w { �°4�d �N'? aaeA]Nn wA➢� N00 A �(*r cE ytr � rsJn ? i •� � ti gq "fie U v � f y N aJ �� P. KP% S K ueg aur .P \R✓g0 01.U�f ComC. L hp a O 'N i"KK Y .nm norv` � M Y n.2 m �m Ayy ., iP HmA ��p°s J VbOld �4 5 P 3 s S y� pti mo \1 J+J U�3A k o,i p19tlH?W i 3S(AI C 5 V \ L3Pi3YNY ,.. I, �„j yiAiFHvN'Q+ '� y \i t� t � € sr v 2 il p t T n.2 m m Ayy ., iP HmA ��p°s J VbOld �4 5 3 IBM < N 011 2)� . .;��. ... ..��.a ... IBM < N Appendix 2: Construction Plans Grading and Drainage Plans 30 IE 4 t,EL H� 0 U5 J.R z z < I— 1 1 u� Eo ol 16 >zo 0 E 4, w V -V 10 zo > � ..� wi _ ) Eii r s '?5._ � A� w�� �� CL M LU < 0 LU U) FL 0 Lu Z 0 >W U) LL 0 U) p" U5 Z <CC < <W n LLJ -J z 'T _j CL > <UZI �w -j W co L'i 0 w Z) ILL 0 0 fr < < Cc z z 0 LIJ 0 LL, 0 (D > co < > �ya w z F 0 W. N, �o u 0 'g Z Y N U) z L 0 fn NQ' �az 9 133HS 33S4i W 0w0 p Z nWQ'ZZ rc6,¢ W gU26d W ¢ � J�'UjW RZ. ~ wpa U � 3 Appendix 3: Soils Information Geotechnical Study and Other Infiltration Testing Data 31 Project No. 1307-12-01 July 17, 2013 Sunwood Lakeview, LLC 9740 Appaloosa Road, Suite 130 San Diego, California 92131 Subject: INFILTRATION PERCOLATION TEST STUDY LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, TRACT 33267 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen: In accordance with your authorization, we have performed an infiltration percolation test study at the subject property, Lakeview Village, Tract 33267, in the Lake Elsinore area, within Riverside County, California. The accompanying report presents the results of our infiltration percolation test study. Should you have questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, LA CRESTA GEOTECHNICAL INCORPORATED Mark A. Sweeney CEG 2339 MAS: (3) Addressee ry WKA `:- � 4 9NE6NEY N Na.2999 * CtM F1E1 gyp. EMINEEING ^T";:) t *RX.'7xi7 iFrR:: UTA, (A °<5W' I;:. I I � ry.I :n. FAX 1951 j 699 1`73 i n Ca;�.. qd`i) tE7<-£:?,.� R � 6.�t1I �c,.r�:�; ,� .,, .,. 4 INFILTRATION PERCOLATION TEST STUDY PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report presents the findings of our infiltration percolation test study for a proposed onsite infiltration basin at a proposed residential development, Lakeview Village, Tract 33267, in the Lake Elsinore area, in Riverside County, California (see Vicinity Map, Figure 1). The purpose of the testing was to evaluate the site's general percolation rates to design an onsite infiltration system. This hrfthration Percolation Test Study included the completion of four (4) percolation tests, which were performed at depths between 7 and 8 feet. An exploratory boring was also excavated and logged to a depth of 22 feet, and a 4 -inch monitoring well was installed. The underlying soils where the testing was completed consisted primarily of Silty Sand, (SM). The base map used for Figure 2 was derived from a copy of a Site Plan, prepared by CSL Engineering. PERCOLATION TESTING AND EXPLORATION PROCEDURES Infiltration Percolation testing was performed in general conformance with ASTM guidelines, and the Porchet Conversion Method. Percolation test holes were bored using an 8 -inch auger. The test holes were excavated to depths between 7 and 8 feet. The test holes were pre-soaked prior to commencement of the test. Percolation rates were measured (minates/inch), with a minimum of 12 measurements taken over a 6 hour period. The results were measured in "Q" Factor which is = Gal /Sq/Ft /Day. The results were also converted to inchesthour using the Porchet Conversion Program/Method. The results of these tests are summarized on Table 1, provided at the end of this report. GROUNDWATER Groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory boring B-1, excavated to a depth of 22 feet. (See Figure 2). Groundwater is in excess of 10 feet below the bottom of the percolation tests holes P-1, P-3 and P-4, in the area of the proposed infiltration basins. What is believed to be isolated "perched water" was encountered in P-2 at a depth of approximately 7-8 feet in the bottom. All other percolation test holes in the area were dry, including the Exploratory Boring B -I which was excavated to a depth of 22 feet. It is our opinion that groundwater encroachment should not be a factor during grading and should not adversely affect the infiltration basin /system, but should be monitored during construction. Project No. 1307 -IMI July 17, 2013 INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS General Using the Porchet Method, the infiltration percolation rate measured varied from 0.62 inches/hour n P-1 to 2.18 inches/hour R P-4 Utilizing the falling head method and calculations for factor "O" = gal. / so/ft / day the rates varied from 1.57 0. P-1 to 8.00 aQ P4 TABLE SUMMARY OF INFILTRATION PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, TRACT 33267 Percolation Test No. Depth (Feet) Porchet Results (inches/hour) Results °Q^ (gal. / sq/ft /day P-1 12.0 0.62 1.57 P-2 8.0 Not Tested (Standing Water in Hole, -7') N/A P-3 7.5 1.74 5.78 P4 8.0 2.18 8.00 Project No. 1307-12-01 July 17, 2013 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS 1. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if die proposed construction will be different from that anticipated herein, La Cresta Geotechnical should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given. The evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous or corrosive materials was not part of the scope of services provided by La Cresta Geotechnical. 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors cant' out such recommendations in the field. 3. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. Project No. 1307-12-01 July 17, 2013 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on July 19'fi-"ih and I1"i, 2013 and consisted of performing 4 infiltration perculatiun tests. The Percolation Tests were performed between depths of 7 and 12 feet. The soil conditions encountered in the excavations were visually examined, classified and logged in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure D2488). The approximate location of the percolation tests, (P-1, P-2, P-3 & P-4) are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Project No. 1307-12-01 July 17, 2013 LOG OF EXPLORATION TEST PIT NO. B-1 Logged by: MAS Date Excavated: 71912013 Equipment Used: New Holland Backhoe Elevation: Existing Grade f DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS a 0 J m ALLUVIUM 1 Lobes, dark gray to medium brown, dry, silty fine to medium SAND, (SMISCI. with some clay. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 Trench terminated at 22 feet No Groundwater Encountered 20 22 24 PROJECT NO. 1307-12.01 FIGURE T-1 Porchet Method - Conversion of Perc Test Legend: Required Entries Percolation Rate to Infiltration Rate No. P-1 Calculated Ce11s Company Name: 'SUNWOOD LAKEVIEW, LLC Date: " 7/17/2013 Designed by: Mark A Sweeney County/City Case No: Riverside Percolation Conversion to Infiltration Rate The conversion equation is used: AH(in) x 60 (min/hr) x r(in) I, (in/hr) — At(min) x [r(in) + 2Ha,,g(in)] If test hole is round - Enter radius here —O r = 4.00 inches If test hole is square - Enter average side width below w= 0.o0 -inches roq= ,0.00; =inches Time interval At = 30.0 minutes Initial height of water during selected time interval Ho- 40.00 inches Final height of water during selected time interval Hr= 34.00 it inches Change in height of water during selected time interval AH — . 6.00r inches Average head height over the selected time interval Ha„s 37.00 inches Converted infiltration rate per test data I, = __0 fi2,'; inches/hour Comments Porchet Method - Conversion of Perc Test Re uired Entries Percolation Rate to Infiltration Rate No. P-3 Legend: Calculated Cells_ Company Name: Si1NWOOD LAKEVIEW, LLC Date: 7/17/2013 Designed by: Mark A Sweeney ' County/City Case No: Riverside Percolation Conversion to Infiltration Rate The conversion equation is used: AH(in) x 60 (min/hr) x r(in) I, (in/hr) = At(min) x [r(in) + 2H,,,(in)] If test hole is round - Enter radius here —� If test hole is square - Enter average side width below w = 0.00 inches Time interval Initial height of water during selected time interval Final height of water during selected time interval Change in height of water during selected time interval Average head height over the selected time interval Converted infiltration rate per test data Comments r = 4.00 inches req _ 0.00.. inches At = 30.0 minutes Ho= 40.00 inches Hr= 25.00 inches AH = 15.00 `inches Have — 32.50 ` inches I, 1.74, ;` inches/hour Porchet Method - Conversion of Perc Test Required Entries Percolation Rate to Infiltration Rate No. p4 Legend: Calculated, Cells Company Name: iSUNWOODLAKEVIEW,`LLC Date: 7/17/2013 Designed by: Mark A Sweeney County/City Case No: Riverside Percolation Conversion to Infiltration Rate The conversion equation is used: I, (in/hr) = AH(in) x 60 (min/hr) x r(in) At(min) x [r(in) + 2H,,s(in)] If test hole is round - Enter radius here --� If test hole is square - Enter average side width below w = 0.00 inches Time interval Initial height of water during selected time interval Final height of water during selected time interval Change in height of water during selected time interval Average head height over the selected time interval Converted infiltration rate per test data Comments r = 4.00 inches r,q 0.00 ', inches At M 30.0 _ minutes Ho= 40.00 inches Hf = 22.00 inches AH 18.00 `inches 31.00inches >inches/hour I 1 t 1 1 1 I I 1 FAULT STUDY 336 UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPNIENI Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California for Classic Pacific FILE COPY FAULT STUDY 336 UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEIIELDPMENI Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California for Classic Pacific Southern Classic Pacific 3197 Airport Loop Drive, Bldg, B Costa Mesa, California 92626 Attention: Mr. Gordon Craig Subject: Fault Study 336 Unit Residential Development Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California chnical August 17, 2004 Project No. 04G160-3 Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have conducted a fault study at the subject site. We are pleased to present this report summarizing the conclusions and recommendations developed from our investigation. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. We look forward to providing additional consulting services during the course of the project. If we may be of further assistance in any manner, please contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. .411 Daryl R. Kas Sta`f Geologist CEG 2125 ) Addressee 1260 North Hancock Street, Suite 101 • Anaheim, California 92807-1951 • (714) 777-0333 • Fax (714) 7770398 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1,1 Purpose and Scope 1 1.2 Site Description 1 1.3 Proposed Development 2 1.4 Previous Studies 2 2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 5 2.1 Fault Trenching and Logging 5 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 6 3.1 Site -Specific Geology 6 3.2 Aerial Photographs 7 3.3 Geologic Setting 7 3.4 Regional Faulting e 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 4.1 Conclusions 9 4.2 Recommendations 10 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 11 6.0 REFERENCES 12 APPENDICES A Plate 1: Site Location Map Plate 2: Fault Trench 1 Location Plan Plate 3: Fault Trench 2 Location Plan Plate 4: Fault Investigation Trench Plate 5: Site Geologic Map Fault Study Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA Project No. 04Gi60-3 Page 3 Parcels 2 and 3 compose a rectangular shaped property approximately 22± acres in size. These parcels are bounded to the southeast by Riverside Drive, to the southwest by Grand Avenue, to the northwest and northeast by a concrete lined flood control channel. These parcels are currently vacant and undeveloped except for a sidewalk which trends northwest to southeast in the southwest area of Parcel 2. Ground surface cover consists of exposed soil with moderate grass and weed growth and several large trees concentrated in the north comer and center of Parcel 3. During our geotechnical investigation the ground surface appears to have been recently mowed or disced. Preliminary topographic information was obtained from a plan prepared by Albert A. Webb and Associates, Inc. This plan indicates that site grades within Parcel 1 range from EI. 1432± feet MSL at the southwest property line to EI. 1332± at the extreme north property corner. Site grades within Parcels 2 and 3 range from a maximum of El. 1301± feet MSL at the western property corner to EI. 1273± at the eastern property corner. The site topography slopes downward to the east at an approximate gradient of 2± percent. 1.3 Proposed Development The preliminary site plans for the proposed development was obtained from Albert A. Webb and Associates, Inc. Based on these plans, Parcel 1 will be developed with a 138 single family residences. Parcels 2 and 3 will be developed with 181 single family residences, some commerciallretail development, and associated infrastructure. The proposed residences are anticipated to consist of one or two story wood frame structures which would be supported on conventional shallow foundation systems and concrete slabs -on -grade. Detailed structural information is not currently available but based on the proposed construction, maximum column and wall loads are expected to be on the order of 20 kips and 2 kips per linear foot, respectively. No below grade construction is expected. Preliminary grading plans were not available at the time of the geotechnical investigation. Based on the existing topography, and assuming a relatively balanced site, cuts and HIS on the order of 10 to 20± feet are expected to be necessary to achieve the anticipated site grades within the development areas. 1.4 Previous Studies A geotechnical investigation was previously conducted for this site by Southern California Geotechnical. This report is identified as follows: Fault Study southem California Geolochnical 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elslnore, CA Aw Project No. 04G160-3 Page 2 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed 336 Residential Development, Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore California, dated July 28, 2004, SCG Project No. 04G160-1. The subsurface exploration conducted for this project consisted of fifteen (15) borings advanced to depths of 20 to 50t feet below existing site grades and twelve (12) exploratory trenches advanced to depths of 9 to 10t feet below the existing site grades, A surficial layer of topsoil/root mat material was encountered at all of the boring and trench locations. This material generally consists of silty fine to medium sand with moderate organic content. At the boring and trench locations, this material was observed to be 4 to 6t inches in thickness. Fill soils were encountered at the ground surface at Borings B-3, B-6, B-7, B-8, B-9, and Trenches T-6, T-7, and T-8. These fill soils extend to depths of 1'/st to 10t feet below existing grade, and generally consist of medium stiff to stiff fine sandy clays. Beneath the artificial fills soils, the borings encountered alluvium comprised of silty to clayey fine to medium sands, and occasional fine sandy silts, and fine to medium sands, extending to depths of at least 50t feet. Very moist to wet soils were encountered during drilling of most of the borings on Parcels 2 and 3 at depths of 6'/: to 17t feet. Delayed readings taken within the open boreholes identified free water at depths of 8 to 17'/:t feet. Based on the observed groundwater levels within the borings and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table on Parcels 2 and 3 is considered to have existed at depths of 8 to 17'/:t feet at the time of subsurface exploration Free water was not encountered during drilling of the two borings or excavation of the trenches on Parcel 1. Based on the lack of any water with the borings and trenches, and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table in Parcel 1 is considered to have existed at a depth in excess of 50t feet at the time of subsurface exploration. The SCG geotechnical report presented grading, foundation, and floor slab design recommendations based on the conditions encountered at the boring locations. A subsurface engineering geology investigation was previously conducted for the northeast adjacent property by Rasmussen & Associates. This report is identified as follows: • Subsurface Engineering Geology Investigation, Proposed High School No. 4, Northwest of Riverside Drive and Southeast of Machado Street Lake Elsinore California, dated November 8, 2000, Project No. 3359 The subsurface exploration conducted for this report consisted of three (3) trenches, totaling 1,326 feet in length that were advanced to depths of 17 to 22t feet below Fault Study Seuthem Callfornla Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development -Lake Elsinore, CA Prolect No. 64G166-3 Page 3 the existing site grades. The trenches were excavated in southwest to northeast direction to intercept any northwest -southeast trending faults that might traverse the site. The materials encountered consisted of silt, sandy silt, and clayey silt, and gravelly and cobbly sand to the maximum depth of the trenches. No evidence of active faulting was observed in the exploratory trenches. An Increase in the amount of tensional soil fracturing was observed in the walls near the southwest property corner. It was concluded that the Wildomar branch of the Elsinore fault zone was expected to be located a few tens to a few hundreds of feet southwest of the high school site. Fault Study Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development—Lake Elsinore, CA Project No. 04G180.3 Page 4 2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION In order to evaluate the possible presence of on-site faulting, two exploratory trenches were excavated and logged in detail by a staff geologist and a certified engineering geologist from our firm. 2.1 Fault Trenching and Logging The fault trench identified at Fault Trench 1 (a total of 49 feet long) was excavated across Parcel 2 to a maximum depth of approximately 181/2 feet below existing ground surface. Fault Trench 1 was excavated across Parcel 2 with an orientation of N 40' E. This orientation is roughly perpendicular to the mapped orientation of the Wildomar Branch of the Elsinore fault zone. The fault trench identified as Fault Trench 2 (a total of 191 feet long) was excavated across Parcel 1 with an orientation of N 45' E. This orientation Is roughly perpendicular to the mapped orientation of the Lucerne Branch of the Elsinore fault zone. The approximate locations of the fault trenches are presented on the Fault Trench 1 Location Ptan (Plate 2) and Fault Trench 2 Location Plan (Plate 3). This allowed for a thorough assessment of the site with regard to possible faults that may cross the site. The logs of the trenches are presented on the enclosed fault investigation trench (Plate 4). Prior to trench excavation, Underground Service Alert was contacted to coordinate location and identification of nearby underground utilities. Fault Trench 1 was excavated 35t feet wide to depths of 18'/= feet below the ground surface. Fault Trench 2 was excavated 3t feet wide to depths of 5%: feet below the ground surface. The trenches were excavated using an excavator with a 36 -inch bucket. The walls of Fault Trench 1 were benched to increase their overall stability. Both Fault Trench 1 and Fault Trench 2 were labeled from southwest to northeast with stations at 10 -foot horizontal intervals. The trench walls were scraped using picks and shovels to remove smears and gouge marks left by the excavator. To prepare a graphic log of the trench, we used the horizontal stations as a reference to scale the trench walls and the geologic features exposed at a 1 inch to 5 foot scale log. The trench location was surveyed using a Brunton compass and measured using a tape measure. After the trenches were geologically logged, they were backfilled but not compacted. Fault Study Southern California aeotechnicai 336 Unit Residential Development- Lake Elsinore, CA « Project No. 04G160.3 Page 5 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Slte-Specific Geolo Based on our subsurface exploration, and review of pertinent geologic and geotechnical literature, the site is underlain by artificial fill and alluvial soils. A description of the units encountered on the site is presented below. Topsoil A surficial layer of topsoil was encountered at Fault Trench 2. This material generally consists olive brown, medium dense, dry, fine sandy silt with some organic content. This material was observed to be up to 1 foot in thickness. Artificial Fill Artificial fill soils identified in Fault Trench 1 extend to depths of 1%± feet. These soils generally consist of loose to medium dense sandy silt with some organic content. A 4 - inch PVC pipe was identified in the fill area and probably was used for irrigation during the past use of the property. Artificial fill soils were also identified in Fault Trench 2. These soils extend to depths of 2t feet below the existing ground surface. These solids generally consist of medium dense fine to coarse sand with some silt. Two 4 -inch PVC pipes were also identified in the fill area. Alluvial Soils Beneath the artificial fill soils, Fault Trench 1 encountered younger alluvial soils. These soils consists of olive brown, medium dense, damp to moist, fine sandy silt with some porosity and varying amounts of calcareous concretions throughout extending to 5t feet below the existing ground surface. Below 5 feet, the alluvium grades to a dark yellowish brown, medium dense, moist, silty fine to medium sand with many soil inclusions extending to 9%z+ feet. The underlying alluvium grades to dark brown, medium dense, moist to very moist fine to coarse sand with some silt extending to 16 feet. Below 16 feet, the alluvium grades to an olive, stiff, very moist to wet, sandy clay extending to 18'/ feet, the maximum depth explored. Beneath the topsoil or artificial fill soils, Fault Trench 2 encountered younger alluvial soils. These soils consists of very dark brown, damp, fine to medium sand with some silt content extending to 3'/2t feet below the existing ground surface. Underlying the younger alluvium, the older alluvium consists of dark brown, moist, medium dense, fine Fault study Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA ' Project No. 04G160-3 ,Page 6 to medium sand with trace fine gravel and cobble extending to the maximum depth explored of 5%± feet. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered during our fault investigation and our original geotechnical investigation for Parcel 2 and 3. Seepage was observed within Fault Trench 1 at elevation 1273 at the southwest end of the trench and at elevation 1265 at the northwest end of the trench. The change in groundwater elevation over a small horizontal distance has created a relatively steep groundwater gradient which would be expected adjacent to a fault acting as a ground water barrier. Groundwater was not encountered during our fault investigation or our original geotechnical investigation for Parcel 1. Based on the conditions encountered at the boring locations during the original geologic investigation, the static groundwater table is considered to have existed at a depth in excess of 50t feet below grade, at the time of the subsurface exploration. 3.2 Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs provided by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation in Riverside, California. The photographs were reviewed to characterize past geomorphology and topography of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. Relative topographic expression can be interpreted using stereo aerial photographs. The photographs span the period of 1948 through 2000. The photograph taken in 1948 depicts a time before urbanization of the subject site and the surrounding area. Photographs taken after this time generally exhibit agricultural development which has partially obscured the topographic expressions that are indicative of the faulting associated with the Elsinore Fault Zone. A depression trending in the northwest - southeast direction is apparent on Parcel 2 of the subject site. This depression is parallel to as the mapped trace of the Wildomar Fault, as indicated on the Santa Ana Sheet (Plate 5). On Parcel 1 there was no evidence of active faulting observed in the alluvial materials of suspected early Holocene age on the aerial photographs reviewed. The location of the depression traversing through Parcel 2 is illustrated on the Geologic Map, included as Plate 5 in Appendix A of this report. 3.3 Geologic Setting Based on our review of the Digital Geologic Map of Santa Ana 30' x 60' Sheet (D.M. Morton, 1999), the subject site is underlain by Quaternary young alluvium valley deposits (Map Symbol Qyva). Based on conditions encountered during the original geotechnical borings and fault trench exploration, it is our opinion that the encountered materials are consistent with the mapped conditions. The Wildomar Branch of the Fault Study Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA Project No. 04G160-3 Page 7 Elsinore Fault Zone is mapped traversing through the northeasterly adjacent property from Parcel 2 trending southeast to northwest. The Lucerne Fault is also mapped traversing through the rentral region of Parcel 1 trending southeast to northwest. The location of the site relative to the surrounding geologic structures is illustrated on the Geologic Map, included as Plate 5 in Appendix A of this report. 3.4 Regional Faulting Based on our review of the State of California. Special Study Zones Map for the Alberhiil Quadrangle, the site is not located within a designated earthquake fault zone as defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the Glen Ivy North branch of the Elsinore fault zone located approximately 1% miles north-northwest of the subject site. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, all new construction within the Fault Rupture Hazard Zone will be preceded by a fault trenching Investigation to determine the presence of on-site strands of any active or potentially active fault and to determine the need for a structural setback. The Elsinore fault zone is a right -lateral strike -slip fault approximately 110 miles in length. Information presented in Southern California Earthquake Center has assigned the following parameters to the Elsinore Fault: • Length: 180 kilometers • Slip Rate: 4.0 millimeters per year • Recurrence Interval: 250 years A detailed study of surface faulting along the Elsinore Fault Zone was also reviewed for this current fault study. The northwest -trending Wildomar branch of the Elsinore fault zone was mapped as buried and traversing the site northeast of the subject property Greenwood and Morton (1991). The State of California, Special Study Zones Map for the Elsinore Quadrangle shows the northwest terminus of the Wildomar fault located approximately 4 miles southeast of the site. Bergmann and Rockwell (1996) have shown that the Elsinore fault zone is active. Ziony and Jones (1989) also showed that the Wildomar fault is active. Smith (1977) presented information that the Wildomar Branch of the Elsinore fault zone probably extended beneath Lake Elsinore. Engel (1959), Rogers (1959), Morton and Lucerne fault traversing through Parcel 1 show any evidence of the Lucerne fault. Southam Cailfamla Gaotechnlcal Gray (1971) showed the northeast trending of the subject site. Jennings (1994) did not Fault Study 336 Unit Resldenllal Development— Lake Elsinore, CA Project No. 04(3160-3 Page 8 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusions We have reviewed readily available reports, maps, and performed a subsurface fault study of the subject site to evaluate the potential for surface faulting at the site. There is positive evidence that a potentially active fault (Wildomar fault) transects the subject site through Parcel 2. There is also no evidence that an active or potentially fault (Lucerne fault) transects the subject site through Parcel 1. These conclusions are based on the following factors: • During the historical air photo review of Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 a depression trending in the northwest -southeast direction was apparent on Parcel 2 of the subject site. This depression is parallel to the mapped trace of the Wildomar Fault. This depression could represent a graben associated with an active fault. During the historical air photo review of Parcel 1 there was no evidence of active faulting observed in the alluvial materials of suspected early Holocene age. During the original geotechnical investigation, ground water data for the subject site was obtained. This ground water data suggests that a northwest -trending ground water barrier is present on Parcel 2. This ground water barrier is associated with the suspected northwest extension of the Wildomar fault. A steep groundwater gradient or seepage zone adjacent to the expected ground water barrier was encountered during our fault investigation exploration in Fault Trench 1. The ground water is suspected to propagate along the Wildomar fault. Therefore, the Wildomar fault is considered to exist at a depth directly below the ground water barrier. Due to the ground water seepage, the exploratory fault trench was limited to 18'/zf feet in depth for stability concerns. The groundwater seepage also precluded direct examination of the fault trace. • No evidence of on-site faulting was encountered within Fault Trench 2 located on Parcel 1. Fault Trench 2 extended in a direction perpendicular to the mapped Lucerne fault of the Elsinore fault zone. Fault Trench 2 extended 5'/2t feet in depth and was extended into older alluvial sediments. No groundwater was encountered during the fault investigation. Evidence of possible on-site faulting was encountered within Fault Trench 1 which was located on Parcel 2 of the subject site and was excavated in a direction perpendicular to the mapped trace of the Wildomar fault. Multiple soil inclusions were identified at different elevations throughout Fault Trench 1. Three sand boil Faun Study Southam California Nontechnical 336 Unit Residential Development -Lake Elslnore, CA Project No'i NG160-3 Page 9 features were also observed in Fault Trench 1 during our investigation. These features indicate that at least one liquefaction event on the site has occurred as a result of a strong nearby earthquake. Although no offset or fault traces were observed in the upper alluvial soils, the presence of the multiple soil inclusions and sand boils in the upper alluvial soils directly above the ground water barrier is considered to be evidence of active faulting along the Wildomar fault. 4.2 Recommendations Based on the results of this fault study, there is evidence to suggest the presence of an active or a potentially active fault on Parcel 2 of the subject site. We recommend that development of the site proceed with the incorporation of structural setbacks related to the active or potentially active fault. The recommended structural set back Is illustrated on Plate 2. There is no evidence to suggest the presence of active or potentially active faults on the subject site on Parcel 1. We recommend that development of the site proceed without the incorporation of any structural setbacks related to active or potentially active faults. The conclusions and recommendations presented in the previously submitted geotechnical investigation are considered valid for the proposed development Fault Study Southern Csllfomia aeoteC 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, CA +Project No; 04G1fi0.3 Page 10 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared as an instrument of service for use by the client, in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. This report may be provided to the contractor(s) and other design consultants to disclose information relative to the project. However, this report is not intended to be utilized as a specification in and of itself, without appropriate Interpretation by the project architect, civil engineer, and/or structural engineer. The reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. Furthermore, any reliance on this report by an unauthorized third party is at such party's sole risk, and we accept no responsibility for damage or loss which may occur. The analysis of this site was based on a subsurface profile interpolated from limited discrete soil samples. While the materials encountered in the project area are considered to be representative of the total area, some variations should be expected between boring and trench locations and sample depths. If the conditions encountered during construction vary significantly from those detailed herein, we should be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. This report has been based on assumed or provided characteristics of the proposed development. It is recommended that the owner, client, architect, structural engineer, and civil engineer carefully review these assumptions to ensure that they are consistent with the characteristics of the proposed development. if discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to verify that they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. We also recommend that the project plans and specifications be submitted to our office for review to verify that our recommendations have been correctly interpreted. The analysis, conclusions, and recommendations contained within this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practice. No other warranty is implied or expressed. Fault Study southem callfomla Geotechnlcai 336 Unit Residential Development— Cake Elsinore, CA Project No. 04G160-3 Page i t 0.0 REFERENCES = Bergmann, M.C. and Rockwell, T.K., 1996, Holocene slip rate of the Elsinore fault in Temecula Valley based on three-dimensional trenching: U.S. Geological Survey Contact No. 1434-93-G-2301. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1980, Special Study Zones (Alguist- Priolo Special Studies Zones Act• AlberhiN Quadrangle, CDMG, Scale 1:24,000 California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1980, Soecial Study Zones (Alguist- Priclo Special Studies Zones Act: Elsinore Quadrangle, CDMG, Scale 1:24,000 Engel, R., 1959 Geology of the Lake Elsinore Quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines Bulletin 146, 154p, Scale 1:62,500.' Greenwood, R.B. and Morton, D.M., 1991, Geologic map of the Santa Ana Quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Open -File Report 91-17, Scale 1:100,000. Jennings, C.W„ 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas with locations and ages of recent volcanic eruptions: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map Series. Map No. 6, Scale 1:750,000. Morton, D.M., and Gray, C.H., Jr., 1971, Geology of the northern Peninsular Ranges, southern California, Geologic guide and road logs for Field Trip No. 4: Cordilleran Section, Geologic Society of America, university of California, Riverside, California. Morton, D.M., 1999, Digital Geologic Map of the Santa Ana 30' x 60' Sheet, California, Scale 1:100,000. Rogers, B.L., 1959, Geologic map and sections of southern Temescal Valley region, Riverside County, California, in Engel, R., Gay, T.E., and Rogers, B.L., Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Lake Elsinore Quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines Bulletin 146, Plate 5. Smith, D.P., 1977, Fault Evaluation Report for the Elsinore fault: California Division of Mines and Geology, Fault Evaluation Report FER-72, 35p. Southern California Earthquake Center, Elsinore Fault, www.scec.org. Ziony, J.I., and Jones, L.M., 1989, Map showing the Quaternary faults and 1978-1984 seismicity of the Los Angeles region, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map, MF -1964, Scale 1:250,000 Fault Study Southern Callfarnia Geatechnlcel 336 Unit Residential Development—Lake Elsinore, CA r" - Project No, 04G760.3 Page 12 APPENDIX A SITE LOCATION MAP FAULT TRENCH 1 LOCATION PLAN FAULT TRENCH 2 LOCATION PLAN FAULT INVESTIGATION TRENCH SITE GEOLOGIC MAP IS / -W Y �^h' 11 IF ,�+ /airy i I A G ,U N I IF'JGp f y r �y rrL �"�-• ._ ^ � PARCEL 1 Y � � �, '� C tt SITE LOCATION MAP PROPOSED 336 UNIT RESIDENTIAL UNITS LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA r • 1,a00' SOURCE ED 9T 7.5MGUTESERIE SURVEY DRAWN: ARK Scothern CaBltornla Geetechnlcal TOPOGRAP11C1(PHOT RM SESERiES. CHND: EFS ALOERH II 1951 lPROTOREN9E0 fleb; SCG PROJECT 04G160 3 1$60 Nanh HOncoda SOW, Sidle 101 PLATE 1 Anehe., Calllomla 91007 Phone:(714) 7770333 Fax: (714) 777-0398 O I r iii wl I e0 NE v E Nz In 1.1 11 I • Eiji I #�C Pi_3sI1 I II'Il.:.'Il,33�w�33. •cin-- t �v 85 I Illllltl 1f Am I �5 E ll1 111 I I 111 gm / I �E z I S� I.I'I I'I Ill I1111�1 e� l i�: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III I I I Y 0—a 1 I I w t -- B i�'....i htu,lr)nt aeylllb 4ba trap..ny aom7nnar a x 1% Ile ,mlY,xaj{Ni ' ? Y t yuil,ed alnCy hognir. dryma. 057 � Maana allexlxl hn depn,Wx {Bp6ttae and [rze Pklplmtm7 Unca�salidxm{ dfpollq of xlmvid !xm xnd hfld Y'x*d 4i.a7na1115l 4K CMaliq PttdamtM41 Y a/pa,et. Ilna, and . lmnl dni qW�tx x"d Rroxlmxl plrt, R{tua wngin hr L o�mk(e Nco.npgpinm zofliment dun dwl pun. lrcluln:. _ ',� Yeuna alln.fli .illey dapxlWn 4llalnvne .nd Inut ]cent l—picrul deppxib aloha vdlaY Oaun, CnnsnIswu of ••..pr.5plipreM u-d, dle, i-,d dry6<xina dlwfum. (nvmGa_ --4f�� Cxo3ogie wnlazt; queried wbere ifIlf,"d Faukj _ Imbed wi:ueappm" / dotted whetq b,,,d, qucricd what tllcertaiW SOLACE. U5C5 OVEN R,F oda, TAL GEOLOGIC MIAPOF THE SA HTh AM1W :1'a�'OUA©Rat16CE', CA 7000 Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions Phase /Environmental Site Assessment or Other Information on Past Site Use 32 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 336 UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California for Classic Pacific FILE COPY California Classic Pacific 3197 Airport Loop Drive, Bldg, B Costa Mesa, California 92626 Attention: Mr, Gordon Craig Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 336 Unit Residential Development Tomlinson Property Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore, California Gentlemen: November 4, 2004 Project No. 04E106-3 In accordance with your request, we have conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the subject site. We are pleased to present this report summarizing the conclusions and recommendations developed from our assessment. We urge you to read the entire report and to contact the undersigned with any questions or concerns you may have about it. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project We look forward to providing additional consulting services during the course of the project. If we may be of further assistance in any manner, please contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. Daryl R. Kas Staff Geologist Mitchell, GE 2364 GE 2294 (5) Addressee 1260 North Hancock Street, Suite 101 • Anaheim, California 92807-1951 • (714) 777-0333 • Fax (714) 777.0398 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 4 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS 5 3.1 Scope of Service 3.2 Limitations and Exceptions 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 7 4.1 Site Location 7 4.2 Site and Vicinity Setting 7 4.3 Current She Usage and Description 8 4.4 Past Property Uses 8 4.5 Current and Past Uses of Adjacent Properties 9 4.6 Summary of Subject Site Reconnaissance 9 4.7 Conclusions 10 5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW 11 5.1 City of Lake Elsinore Building Department Records 11 5.2 Riverside County Building and Safety Department 11 5.3 Riverside County Assessors Office 11 5.4 City Directories 11 5.5 Aerial Photographs 15 5.6 Conclusions 17 6.0 PHYSICAL SETTING RECORDS REVIEW 18 6.1 USGS Quadrangle Maps 18 6.2 Geologic Conditions 18 6.3 Radon 19 6.4 Conclusions 19 7.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORD REVIEW 20 7.1 County of Riverside 20 7.2 Combined County, State And Federal Database Report 20 7.3 Summary of Listed Sites 22 7.4 Flle Review 24 7.5 Conclusions 25 336 Unit Residential Development - Lake Elsinore, California Southam California Geotechnical Protect No. 04E106-3 filly 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 27 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 29 10.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 30 APPENDICES A Plate 1: Site Location Map Plate 2: Surrounding Property Usage B Site Photographs C Historic Aerial Photograph D TRACK INFO SERVICES Environmental First Search Report E Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Closure Letter 338 UnR Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. o4E10e•3 1.0 EKECIMVE SUMMARY A summary of the findings and conclusions for this report are briefly outlined below. It should be noted that this executive summary does not fully represent the findings and opinions. The findings and opinions are related through the full report only. The subject site is subdivided into 4 parcels, designated by Southern California Geotechnical (SCG) as Parcels 1 thorough 4. Each parcel is associated with an assessor's parcel number. Assessor's Parcel Numbers SCG Designation 379-050-034 Parcel 1 387-170-006 Parcel 387-180-001 Parcel 2 387-080-003 Parcel 4 Parcel 1 is bounded to the southeast by Riverside drive, to the southwest by Grand Avenue, to the northwest by the Grand Oaks Apartments, and the northeast by a high school. Parcel 2 is bounded to the northeast by Laguna Avenue, to the northwest by Riverside Drive, to the southeast by single family residences,. and to the southwest by the Elsinore Mountains. Parcel 3 is bounded to the northeast by Laguna Drive, to the northwest by Drecott Way, to the southeast by Riverside Drive, and to the southwest by the Elsinore Mountains. Parcel 4 is bounded to the northeast by Grand Avenue, to the northwest by Riverside Drive, to the southwest by Laguna Drive, and to the southeast by single family residences. • Most of the subject site is currently vacant and undeveloped. A sidewalk trends north -south on the west side of Parcel 1 and a water well are located on the southwest area of Parcel 1. An above ground storage tank (AST) and concrete wall is located on the southwest area of Parcel 2. Based on information provided by the client, the AST historically was used for irrigation purposes only and only contained water. At the time of this investigation the AST appeared empty and no spills, leaks, or odors were observed at the time of the site reconnaissance. Therefore, this above ground storage tank is not considered to represent an adverse environmental condition. 336 Unit Residential Development- Lake Elsinore, California Southern Ceilfornla Geotechnical Project No. 04E106-3 �I - 111111111 Page 1 No evidence of hazardous substances, environmental mismanagement, underground storage tanks or other adverse environmental conditions were observed during our reconnaissance of the subject site and the immediately adjacent properties. Based on a review of aerial photographs, Parcel 1 historically was used for agricultural purposes. Sometime between 1980 and 1983 Parcel 1 was used for a nursery. In 1992 the nursery was permitted to be demolished, and all structures were removed from Parcel 1. Since 1992 Parcel 1 has remained vacant. Parcel 2 was historically used for agricultural purposes also. A single family residence was constructed on the site between 1974 and 1975. The single family residence was demolished between 1990 and 1995. No permit was issued by the County of Riverside for the demolition of the single family residence. Parcel 2 has remained vacant since the demolition. Parcel 3 was historically used for agricultural purposes until sometime between 1984 and 1990. Parcel 3 has remained vacant since that time. Parcel 4 has historically been vacant. There is no information to Indicate that any portion of Parcel 4 has ever been developed or that any structures have ever been present. • The combined environmental database report identified four (4) ERNS sites located within 1/8 mile of the subject site, one (1) State site within 1/8 mile of the subject site, three (3) leaking underground storage tank (LUST) within Y2 mile of the subject site, and one (1) underground storage tank (UST) within 1/8 mile of the subject site. Based on their current regulatory status, their location with respect to the regional groundwater gradient, and/or their distance from the subject site, none of these facilities are considered to have a significant potential to have impacted the soils or groundwater of the subject site. • Four USTs were previously present at the subject site. Two UST's were located on Parcel 1 and two UST's were located on Parcel 2. The USTs previously present on Parcel 1 consisted of two 1,000 -gallon gasoline and diesel fuel storage tanks. Two 500 -gallon automotive fuel storage tanks were previously present at Parcel 2. In a report dated April 20, 1990, ICG Hydrotech indicated that they observed the removal of underground storage tanks located on Parcel 1 and 2. Environmental sampling of in situ soils adjacent to the former USTs was subsequently conducted. Results of the sampling performed at the subject site indicated 83 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in sample collected at 2 feet below grade beneath the UST on Parcel 1. Benzene, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene were also detected at concentrations between 6 and 25 parts per billion. This report was submitted to the County of Riverside Department of Health. The County of Riverside Department of Health determined that no significant contamination existed and that no further site mitigation would be required at both sites. The County of Riverside Department of Health issued a closure letter on May 15, 1990. 336 Unit Residential Development — lake Elsinore, Callfomia Southern California Ceatechnical Project No. 04E106-3 Page 2 Although the County of Riverside Department of Health issued a closure letter in regards to the UST sites located on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, residual contaminants may exist at depths of 10 to 20t feet at the removed UST locations. It is recommended that any disturbance to the soils near the demolished USTs during grading be limited, as this could necessitate additional testing. No other investigation with regard to environmental considerations is considered warranted, subject to the limitations contained within this report. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southern Calitarnle Geotechnical Project No. 04E1 06-3 6f•11®!�I Page 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) has been completed for Parcels 379- 050-034, 387-180-001, 387-170-006, and 387-080-003 located at the comer Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue in the city of Lake Elsinore, California. This assessment was performed at the request of Mr. Gordon Craig of Classic Pacific. The scope of services Included research, a review of specified listings, and a site reconnaissance. The Phase I ESA has been conducted in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1527-00. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 3.0 of this report. A Phase I ESA is conducted to permit formulation of an opinion as to the potential for hazardous materials to exist at a site at levels likely to warrant mitigation pursuant to the regulations of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and defined by the State of California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and/or the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Opinions relative to the hazardous material potential given in this report are based upon information derived from the most recent site reconnaissance and from other activities described herein. The most recent site reconnaissance was performed by Daryl R. Kas of Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., on October 28, 2004. The clients are hereby advised that the conditions observed at the time of the most recent site reconnaissance are subject to change. Certain indicators of the presence of hazardous materials may have been latent at the time of the most recent site reconnaissance and may subsequently become observable, In a similar manner, the research effort conducted for a Phase I ESA is limited. Accordingly, it is possible that Southern California Geotechnical, inc.'s research, while fully appropriate for a Phase I ESA, failed to indicate the existence of important information sources. Assuming that such sources exist, their information could not have been considered in the formulation of our findings and opinions. 336 unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Protect No. 04E106-3 Page 4 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS 3.1 Scope of Service The scope of services conducted for this assessment was mutually developed and outlined per conversations with the client on October 27, 2004. The services provided as part of this assessment are outlined below: A reconnaissance of the subject property to identify indicators of the existence of hazardous materials regulated by the USEPA or the CRWQCB, and/or indications of environmental mismanagement activities. • A cursory reconnaissance of adjacent properties, conducted from public thoroughfares and/or the subject site, in an attempt to see if any included facilities or structures are operated by entities that are likely to use, store, generate or dispose of hazardous materials. • A review of appropriate federal, state, and local regulatory agency records and documents for the subject property and general vicinity, as defined by ASTM E- 1527. • A review of aerial photographs obtained from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation and Rupp Aerial Photography to obtain information concerning the history of the site. • A review of available historic City Directories to obtain information concerning previous occupants of the subject site or adjacent properties. • A review of the US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute Alberhill, California topographic quadrangle map to obtain information about the topography and previous development of the subject site and the surrounding area. • A review of the Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, published by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, issued September 1978, to determine the characteristics of the near -surface soils at the subject site. • Personal and/or telephone interviews with staff members of state, county, and local units and agencies of government, as well as private citizens. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Soathern Calilomla Geatechnlcal Pmject No. 04E106-3 Page 5 • An evaluation of the collected information and the preparation of this report including the resulting conclusions and recommendations. A review of a chain -of -title report, a wetland survey, a radon survey, lead paint survey, an asbestos survey and an archeological survey were not included in the scope of services for this project. 3.2 limitations and Exceptions The findings and opinions conveyed within this report are based on information obtained from a variety of sources, as enumerated herein, and which we believe are reliable. Nonetheless, we cannot and do not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of the information that we have relied upon. This report is not a comprehensive site characterization and should not be construed as such. The opinions presented in this report are based on findings derived from a site reconnaissance, a review of specified regulatory records and historical sources, and comments made by interviewees. We have found no indicators that suggest that hazardous materials exist at the site at levels that are likely to warrant mitigation. However, not finding such indicators does not mean that hazardous materials do not exist at the site. Phase I ESAs by their very nature, are limited. Southern California Geotechnical, Inc has endeavored to meet what we believe to be the applicable standard of care, and in so doing is obliged to advise the named clients of Phase I ESA limitations. We believe that providing information about the limitations of a Phase I ESA is essential to help our named clients identify and thereby manage their risks. These risks can be mitigated, but they cannot be eliminated, through additional research. We will upon request, advise our clients of the additional research opportunities available, their impact on risk, and their cost. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore. California Southern Callforels aeotechnlcal Project No. 04E106-3 Page 6 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 4.1 Site Location The subject site is comprised of four parcels located at the corner of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue in Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. These parcels have been designated by Southern Califomla Geotechnical as Parcels 1 through 4. Each Parcel is associated with an assessor's parcel number below: Assessor's Parcel Numbers SCG Designation Historic Address 379-050-034 Parcel 1 32789 Riverside Drive 387-170-006 Parcel 2 15319 Laguna Avenue 387-180-001 Parcel 3 387-080.003 Parcel 4 Two of the parcels historically have been referenced by street addresses. Parcel 1 previously had a street address of 32789 Riverside Drive, and Parcel 2 previously had a street address of 15319 Laguna Avenue. Parcel 1 and Parcel 4 are located in the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 are located in unincorporated County of Riverside, Califomia. Plate 1 included in Appendix A illustrates the generalized location of the subject property. 4.2 Site and Vicinity Setting The subject site is located in an area which is developed with residential properties with a few commercial facilities. Parcel 1 is bounded to the southeast by Riverside drive, to the southwest by Grand Avenue, to the northwest by the Grand Oaks Apartments, and the northeast by a high school. Parcel 2 is bounded to the northeast by Laguna Avenue, to the northwest by Riverside Drive, to the southeast by single family residences, and to the southwest by the Elsinore Mountains. Parcel 3 is bounded to the northeast by Laguna Drive, to the northwest by Drecott Way, to the southeast by Riverside Drive, and to the southwest by the Elsinore Mountains. Parcel 4 is bounded to the northeast by Grand Avenue, to the northwest by Riverside Drive, to the southwest by Laguna Drive, and to the southeast by single family residences The subject property and general land uses in the vicinity of the subject property are illustrated on Plate 2, Surrounding Property Usage, included in Appendix A. Photographs of the subject property and the general vicinity, dated October 28, 2004 are enclosed in Appendix B. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern Calitontla Geotechnlcal Project No. 04EI06.3 Page 7 4 3 Current Site Usage and Description The subject site consists of 4 separate parcels. Parcel 1 is a rectangular shaped parcel approximately 22t acres is size. This parcel is currently vacant of any structures except for the sidewalk that trends north -south in the western area of the parcel, and a water well located on the southwest area of the parcel. Ground surface cover within Parcel 1 consists of moderate grass and weed growth with several large trees located In the north and north central area of the parcel. Parcel 2 is an irregular-shaped parcel approximately 25t acres in size. This parcel is currently vacant of any structures except for an above ground storage tank (AST) and a concrete wall located in the southwest comer of the parcel. Ground surface cover with Parcel 2 consists of exposed soil with sparse grass and weed growth including several trees located mainly in the southeast area of the parcel. Parcel 3 is roughly a rectangular -shaped parcel approximately 15t acres in size. This parcel is currently vacant of any structures. Ground surface cover with Parcel 3 consists of exposed soil with sparse grass and weed growth. Parcel 4 is a rectangular -shaped parcel approximately 8t acres in size. Ground surface cover with Parcel 4 consists of exposed soil with sparse grass and weed growth. No evidence of the potential presence of environmental concerns, such as depressions, discolored or odorous soil, or stressed vegetation was observed at the subject site. The AST located on Parcel 2 appeared empty and no spills, leaks, or odors were observed at the time of the site reconnaissance. Based on conservations with the client, the AST historically contained water and was used for irrigation purposes, therefore, this AST is not considered to represent an adverse environmental condition. 4.4 Past Property Uses Parcel 1 previously was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1980. Prior to 1983 and after 1980 Parcel 1 was used as a nursery. The nursery was demolished in 1992. Since 1992 Parcel 1 has remained vacant of any major structures. Parcel 2 was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1984. A single family residence was built on Parcel 2 sometime after 1974, but before 1980. The single family residence was demolished after 1990 and prior to 1995. Parcel 2 has remained vacant of any structures except of the above mentioned above ground storage tank and concrete wall. Parcel 3 was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1984. There is no indication that Parcel 3 has ever been developed with any structures. There is no indication that Parcel 4 has ever been developed. 336 Unit Residential Development— lako Elsinore, California southern Cailtomie Geotechnical Project No. 04EI06-3 qqy Page 8 4.5 Current and Past Uses of Adiacent Properties Grand Oaks Apartments and a vacant lot occupy the area northwest of Parcel 1 across the Riverside County Flood Control Channel. The Butterfield Village mobile homes are located southeast of Parcel 1 across Riverside Drive. The Elsinore High School #4 is currently being constructed and is located northeast of Parcel 1 across the Riverside County Flood Control Channel. Single family residences occupy the areas southeast of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4, northeast of Parcel 3, northwest of Parcel 3 and Parcel 4. No previous uses of the adjacent properties were readily apparent during the site reconnaissance. 4.6 Summary of Subiect Site Reconnaissance • Hazardous Substances on site that may pose potential environmental concerns......................................................................None Observed • Observations that may indicate potential environmental concerns • Staining and Corrosion........................................................ None Observed • Drains and Sumps............................................................... None Observed • Stained Soil and/or Pavement ............................................. None Observed • Stressed Vegetation............................................................ None Observed • Drums/Other Containers..................................................... None Observed • Pits, Ponds & Lagoons........................................................ None Observed • Odors.................................................................................None Observed Wetlands............................................................................. None Observed • PCB sources that may pose potential environmental concerns • Transformers.......................................................................None Observed • Capacitors...........................................................................None Observed • Light Ballasts...................................................................... None Observed • Compressors....................................................................... None Observed • Hydraulic Lifts...................................................................... None Observed • Solid waste production and storage • Hazardous,., ...................................... ................................. None Observed • Nonhazardous.....................................................................None Observed • Spills • Petroleum............................................................................None Observed • Other................................................................................. None Observed 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Gootechnical Project No. 04E106-3 rtal�l f1YY® Page 9 • Storaae Tanks Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)........................................... Observed • Underground Storage Tanks(USTs)................................... None Observed • Wastewater Discharges Sanitary ...............................................................................None Observed Industrial..............................................................................None Observed Septic Systems................................................................... None Observed • Water Supplies • Surrounding areas are on municipal water supplies. Monitoring Wells • No groundwater monitoring wells were observed on the subject property. 4.7 Conclusions Information obtained by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., during the site reconnaissance, observation of adjacent properties, and during the interviews (if any) discussed above, does not suggest the presence of any recognized environmental conditions at the subject site. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern Calltomla Geotechnical Project No. 04E106.3 Page 10 5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW 5.1 City of Lake Elsinore Building Department Records Research was conducted at the City of Lake Elsinore Building Department for building permits that may have been historically issued for Parcel 1 or Parcel 4. According to Building Department personnel, a demolition permit was issued for the address 32789 Riverside Drive (Parcel 1) in 1992. Parcel 4 has been historically vacant and therefore no building permits were available. Furthermore, the City did not have a street address assigned to Parcel 4, 5.2 Riverside County Building and Safety Department Research was conducted at the Riverside County Building and Safety Department for building permits that may have been historically issued for Parcel 2 and Parcel 3. According to Building and Safety Department personnel, no building permits have been issued for 15319 Laguna Avenue (Parcel 2) or Parcel 3. The County did not have a street address assigned to Parcel 3. 5.3 Riverside County Assessors Office Research was conducted at the Riverside County Assessors office to determine the ownership history of the subject site. Information regarding ownership history since 1975 was available for review. Parcel 1 is currently assigned APN 379-050-034. Parcel 2 is currently assigned APN 387-170-006. Parcel 3 Is currently assigned APN 387-180-001, and Parcel 4 is currently assigned APN 387-080-003. Records available at the Riverside County Assessors office indicate that Parcels 1 through 4 are currently owned by Tomlinson & Sons, of Capistrano Beach, California, Parcel 2 and 3 has been owned by Tomlinson & Sons since the 1978 tax records. Previous to 1978 the State of California owned Parcels 2 and 3 since 1975. Previous to 1975, Peter J. Lehr owned Parcel 2 and 3. Information regarding the ownership history was unavailable for Parcels 1 and 4. 5.4 City Directories Historical telephone street directories were Riverside, California, to characterize past vicinity. Directories from the following ye; reviewed at the Riverside Central Library in development of the subject property and rrs were reviewed: 1975, 1983, 1991, and 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern Califorale Geotechnical Project No. 04E106-3 ® Page 11 1995. The 1975 and 1995 directories were the oldest and most recent directories available, respectively. CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW Year Address Listing 1995 Riverside Drive 32310 Kay Jordan Camp 32391 CA Glass and Supply CA Tint EI Tapatio Elsinore Electric Sampsonlo Seers Lunker Superior Blinds 32500 Apartments 32700 Apartments 32900 Butterfield Village Grand Avenue 15128 Delcon, Fred 15130 Apartments 15132 McKay, Robert 15134 Olascuage, Ana 15136 Bham, Hemant 15138 Arevato Made 15140 Charles, Robert 15142 Pawer, Michael 15188 Gomez, Raul 15190 Brown, William 15192 Brazier, Don 15194 McGuire, C. 15196 Dixon, Jason 15198 Van Hooser, William 15200 Grand Oaks Apartments 15373 Rogers Minl Mart 15403 Action Court Services 15410 Gowdy, Cheryl Laguna Avenue 15208 Fedrick, K. 15228 Zerr, Debra 15238 Hudson, Greg 15244 Cunningham, Jason 15373 Ness, T. 15521 Purpura,. John 1991 Riverside Avenue 32310 Apartments 32391 CA Glass and Supply Cherry Overhead Door EI Senor Graphics Elsinore Graphics Haskib Brian 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California southem California Geotechnical Project No. 04E106-3 Page 12 CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW Year Address Listing 1991 Leebos Caft Monigues Salon Regal Concrete Sampsonic 32500 Apartments 32693 Gutierrez, Michael 32700 Apartments 32789 Flynn Rainbow Nursery (Subject Site) 32790 Apartments 32900 Butterfield Village Grand Avenue 15128 Apartments 15130 Apartments 15132 Apartments 15134 Apartments 15136 Apartments 15138 Apartments 15139 Swick, Robert 15140 Torres, Charles 15142 Briggs, Debra 15146 Abraham, Khakid 15148 Apartments 15150 Apartments 15162 Apartments 15164 Apartments 15165 Boucher, David t 15166 Apartments r Laguna Avenue 15208 Fedrick K. 15214 Stone, Brad 15218 McFadden, W. 15224 Crahm Suzanne 15228 Zerr, Debra 1 15234 Murrie, Kirk 15238 Moran, David 15244 Buckeridge, Dale 15373 Ness, T. 15435 Langford, Nancy 15455 Hoxsey, Patrick 1983 Riverside Drive 32310 Cessum, F. James, Chas 32341 Kara, Soulas Lakeland Escrow 32390 Thoreson, Wally 32391 Bright Way Electric Supply CA Glass and Supply Comet International Air 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04E106-3 alW�it Page 13 CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW Year Address Listing 1983 S&D Yams Turner Realty 32693 Burgess, Tommy 32789 AMFAC Nursery Services (Subject Site) 32790 Apartments 32900 Butterfield Village 32990 Hunts, Robert Grand Avenue 15145 Foley, Jason 15165 Cole, Joe 15170 Wells, J. 15171 Gibson, Jefferson 15175 Hickey, Robert 15181 Root, E. 15199 Avila, Jorge 15209 Sandoval, Frank 15353 Queen, Gary 15373 Mission Bell Real Estate 15403 Board of Realtors 15410 McGill, Bobn 15485 Bartsch, Walter 15519 Rice & Sons Construction Laguna Avenue 15206 Mottishaw, Brian 15214 Reilly, Anne 15218 McFaden, W. 15224 Larason, Ray 15228 Zerr, Debra 15244 Whitehead, Chas 15248 Salazar, Carlos 15319 Lehr, Peter (Subject Site) 15435 Woodman, Harold 15455 Brock, Marvin 1975 Riverside Drive 32290 Kuntzmann, H. 32341 Karasoulas 32390 Tomlins Roadrunner 32789 Maddox, John (Subject Site) Stanley, Jerry 32790 Sun Inns Inlematlon 32880 Ponce, Andreas 32900 Butterfield Village 33371 Scharr, John Grand Avenue 15115 Oros, John 15145 Traver, E. 15170 Harrison, P. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04E106.3 Page 14 CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW Year Address Listing 1975 15171 Blbson, Jefferson 15181 Root, E. 15199 Michaels, Lee 15353 Raines, Don 15373 Mission Bell Company 15410 MCGIII, Robert 15485 Bertsch, Walter 15519 Town & County Realty Laguna Avenue 15139 Medby, M. 15151 Mora, Gilbert 15161 Silva, Martin 15165 Rodgers, Gary Parcel 1 has historically been assigned the street address of 32789 Riverside Drive. Parcel 2 has historically been assigned the street address of 15319 Laguna Avenue. In 1975, Parcel 1 was identified as a single family residence, and then in 1983 the parcel was identified as a nursery. In 1995 the address 32789 Riverside Drive was not listed. In 1983, Parcel 2 was identified as a single family residence, and in 1991 the address 15319 Laguna Drive was not listed. Parcel 3 and Parcel 4 have not been assigned a street address. However, based on the location of Parcel 3, it would be expected to have an odd numbered address in the range of 15317 to 15300 Laguna Drive. Parcel 4 would be expected to have an even numbered address in the range of 33030 to 33100 Riverside Drive, or an odd numbered address in the range of 15333 to 15301. Our review of the available city directories does not indicate the presence of any commercial, residential, or retail developments, for Parcel 3 or Parcel 4 in this range of addresses since at least 1975, the earliest directory available. 5.5 Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs provided by Rupp Aerial Photography in Corona, Califomia and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation in Riverside, California were reviewed to characterize past usage of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. Aerial photographs from the following years were available for review: 1962, 1974, 1980, 1984, 1990, 1995, and 2000. A brief summary of the aerial photographs reviewed is presented below. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southam California geotechnical Project No. ME106-3 Page 15 January 26 1962: Scale 1 inch = 2.000± feet Parcel 1 was developed with a single family residence structure located in the north comer of the parcel. The drainage channel that boarders Parcel 1 to the northeast and northwest is not visible at the time of this photograph. Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, Laguna Avenue, and EI Contento are located in their present day location. Parcels 2 and 3 are being used for agricultural purposes, presumably citrus orchards. Parcel 4 is vacant of any structures and does not appear to be used for any agricultural purposes. June 20 1974: Scale 1 inch = 2,001J± feet The subject property and surrounding area are generally unchanged from the previous photograph. However, the Butterfield mobile homes that are located southeast of Parcel 1 are visible for the first time in this photograph. The Riverside County Flood Control Channel is visible and appears to be lined concrete. Parcel 3 is vacant of agricultural activity. The single family residences that are located northwest of Parcel 3 are also now visible. Although urbanization surrounding the subject site is evident, the general area is still being used for agricultural purposes May 4 1980: Scale 1 inch = 2.000± feet The subject property and surrounding area are generally unchanged from the previous photograph. A single family residential structure located in the southeast area of Parcel 2 is visible for the first time in this photograph. The single family residences are also Visible southeast of Parcel 2. Three small structures, in addition to the existing structure, are visible in the north corner of Parcel 1. The single family residential tract northwest of Parcel 4 is currently being constructed at the time of this photograph. January 3. 1984: Scale 1 inch = 1,600 feet The subject property and surrounding area are generally unchanged from the previous photograph. The single family residential tract northwest of Parcel 4 is completed at the time of this photograph. January 22, 1990: Scale 1 inch =1,600 feet The subject property and surrounding area are generally unchanged from the previous photograph. The Grand Oak Apartments located northwest of Parcel 1 are visible for the first time in this photograph. January 31 1995: Scale 1 inch = 1,600 feet The subject property and surrounding area appear to be in a configuration similar to the present configuration. The structures that were located on the north corner of Parcel 1 have been removed, and the single family residence located on the southeast area of 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04E106-3 Page 16 Parcel 2 also has been removed. All of the parcels are vacant of any structures at the time of this photograph. Within all of the parcels, grass and weed growth appear to cover the ground surface. We also reviewed a historic aerial photograph taken from the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County. Our review of the soil survey is discussed in Section 6.2 of this report. The soil survey uses a 1974 aerial photograph as the base map on which soil conditions are identified. This aerial photograph is reproduced in Appendix C of this report. The 1974 aerial photograph depicts site conditions that are very similar to those documented in the June 20, 1974 photograph from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation. 5.6 Conclusions Information obtained by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., during the historical records review does not suggest the presence of any recognized environmental conditions at the subject site. The historical research indicates that Parcel 1 previously was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1980. Prior to 1983 and after 1980 Parcel 1 was used as a nursery. The nursery was demolished in 1992. Since 1992 Parcel 1 has remained vacant of any major structures. Parcel 2 was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1984. A single family residence was built on Parcel 2 sometime after 1974, but before 1980. The single family residence was demolished after 1990 and prior to 1995. Parcel 2 has remained vacant of any structures except of the above mentioned AST and concrete wall. Parcel 3 was used for agricultural purposes sometime prior to 1962 until sometime after 1984. There is no indication Parcel 3 has ever been developed with any structures. There is no indication that Parcel 4 has ever been developed. The surrounding area was utilized for agricultural purposes and then slowly developed with residential and commercial buildings between 1962 and 1985. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southam Ca�llf rola Geotechnical Project No. 04EI05-3 �w Page 17 6.0 PHYSICAL SETTING RECORDS REVIEW 6.1 USGS Quadrangle Maps The USGS Alberhill, California, 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map illustrates the location of the subject property. A copy of the portion of this map covering the subject site is included as Plate 1 in Appendix A of this report. The map was published in 1951 and was subsequently photorevised in 1997. According to the map, the subject property ranges in elevation of approximately 1400 feet above mean sea level at the southwest area of Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 to 1280 feet above mean sea level at the northeast area of Parcel 1. Regional topography consists of the Elsinore Mountains immediately southwest of the subject site, with drainage towards the northeast into Lake Elsinore. 6.2 Geologic Conditions Soil Type and Permeability According to the Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California, Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 is underlain by the Hanford Series sands. The Hanford Series soils consist of moderately well drained soils on alluvial fans. In a typical profile, this soil consists of a surface layer of grayish brown sandy loam to a depth of 4 inches. A very dark grayish brown sandy loam extends to a depth of 14 inches, and pale brown sandy loam extends to a depth of 31 inches, and similar sandy loam to a depth of at least 60 inches. The Hanford Series is presently used for citrus, dryland pasture, olives, and urban development. This soil unit possesses a moderate permeability. Groundwater Information regarding the depth of groundwater was obtained during our original geotechnical investigation. Below is a summary of the groundwater data provided in our report: and Grand Avenue Lake Elsinore California, prepared for Classic Pacific, prepared by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., dated July 28, 2004, SCG Project No. 0413160-1. Very moist to wet soils were encountered during drilling of most of the borings on Parcels 2 and 3 at depths of 6'/2 to 17t feet. Delayed readings taken within the open 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California southern Callfornla Gootechnlcal Project No. 04E10e-3 Page 18 boreholes identified free water at depths of 8 to 17'/� feet. Based on the observed groundwater levels within the borings and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table on Parcel 1 is considered to have existed at depths of 8 to 17%± feet at the time of subsurface exploration. Very moist to wet soils were encountered during drilling of Boring B-9 on Parcel 4 at a depth of 39 feet. Delayed readings taken within the open borehole identified free water at a depth of 38'1 feet. Based on the observed groundwater levels within the borings and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table on Parcel 4 is considered to have existed at a depth of 3B% feet at the time of subsurface exploration. Free water was not encountered during drilling of the two borings or excavation of the trenches on Parcels 2 and 3. Based on the lack of any water with the borings and trenches, and the moisture contents of the recovered soil samples, the static groundwater table in Parcels 2 and 3 is considered to have existed at a depth in excess of 50t feet at the time of subsurface exploration. 6.3 Radon The potential for naturally occurring radon to exist on the site has been evaluated by consulting the Geologic Radon Potential of EPA Region 9, published by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (OFR 93-292-I, published in 1993). The purpose and intended use of this report is to help identify areas where states can target their radon program resources and to provide guidance in selecting the most appropriate building code options for areas, and to provide general information on radon and geology for federal, state and municipal officials dealing with radon issues. This report is not intended to be used as a substitute for indoor radon testing, and cannot and should not be used to estimate or predict the indoor radon concentrations of individual homes, building sites or housing tracts, This report includes indoor radon data accumulated in two prior nation-wide studies. Indoor radon levels are divided into three categories: Low (<2.0 pCi/L), Moderate (2.0- 4.0 pCi/L) and High (a4.0 pCi/L). The radon screening data for Riverside County includes 24 measurements. The maximum level recorded was 1.7 pCi/L, and the mean level was 0.3 pCi/L. 6.4 Conclusions Information obtained by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., during the physical setting records review does not suggest the presence of any recognized environmental conditions at the subject site. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Gootechnlcal Project No. 04E106-3 ® Page 19 7.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORD REVIEW 7.1 Countyof Riverside Fire Department Southern California Geotechnical conducted research at the Riverside County Fire Department. We requested any records related to hazardous materials storage, violations and permits, including those for underground storage tanks. No fire department records were available for either 32789 Riverside Drive or 15319 Laguna Avenue. Since Parcel 3 and Parcel 4 do not have assigned street addresses, no fire department records were available, 7.2 Combined Countv State And Federal Database Report County, state, and federal environmental listings and databases were compiled and searched by a nationwide regulatory agency database company, Track Info Services, LLC of San Diego, California. The listings and databases were compiled by Track Info Services for sites located within the minimum search distance indicated by the standards promulgated by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ASTM E1527-00). The actual distances to which each database or listing was searched are indicated within the Track Info Services Environmental First Search Report, included as Appendix C of this report. A description of each of the listings is presented below, including the ASTM -specified search radius, and the types of facilities which are included on the listing. Additional explanations of the federal and state listings are provided in the portion of the Track Info Services report entitled "Federal Databases and Sources". Section 7.3 of this report provides a summary of any sites identified within the Track Info Services report which are within the appropriate search radii. Federal NPL Site List The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Priorities List (NPL) or Superfund Listing, was searched by Track Info Services for all sites located within 1 mile of the subject property. This listing was last updated September 12, 2004. Federal CERCLIS Site List The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information Source (CERCLIS), 336 Unit Residentlal Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern Callfarnis Geotechnical PmJect No. 04E106 3 Page 20 was searched by Track Info Services for all sites located within 0.5 miles of the subject property. This database, along with the NPL list includes all sites receiving or potentially eligible to receive Superfund investigation and/or remediation assistance in California. This listing was last updated September 13, 2004. Federal RCRA Facility Lisl The USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) listing, dated September 12, 2004, was compiled by Track Info Services. This listing includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This listing was reviewed for treatment, storage or disposal facilities (TSDs) within 0.5 miles of the subject property and for TSD facilities with RCRA violations within 1.0 mile of the subject property. Track Info Services conducted a review of the USEPA RCRA Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) list dated September 12, 2004. CORRACTS facilities are those that are undergoing corrective action as a result of a release of hazardous materials into the environment from a RCRA facility. This list was reviewed for sites located within 1.0 mile of the subject property. The RCRIS listings (September 12, 2004) were also reviewed by Track Info Services for small quantity generators (SmGen) and large quantity generators (LgGen) on the subject property and adjacent properties. Federal Emergency Response Records The USEPA Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list, dated December 31, 2003, which lists spill records and information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances reviewed by Track Info Services to check for the inclusion of the subject property and facilities located adjacent to the subject property. State of California Hazardous Waste Sites List The California Hazardous Waste Sites (CAL -SITES) list dated March 2, 2004, which combines the former Abandoned Sites Program Information System (ASPIS) and the state Superfund list was reviewed by Track Info Services to check for the inclusion of the subject property and facilities located within a 1 mile radius of the subject property. Track Info Services conducted a database search to a radius of 1 mile for SPL sites (Annual Workplan, or State Superfund sites, and high priority sites) and SCL sites (medium/low priority and no further action sites). 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04E106.3 Page 21 State of California Landfill List The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database, maintained by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, dated October 11, 2004, was reviewed by Track Info Services for landfills within a 0.5 mile radius of the subject property. State of California Leaking UST List The Track Info Services report includes research of the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) database for sites located within 0.5 mile of the subject property. The LUST Information System (LUSTIS) published by the State Water Resources Control Board was most recently updated on May 26, 2004. State of California UST/AST Lists The Califomia Underground Storage Tank (UST) Registrations listing, and the Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Database, which list all registered USTs and ASTs in the State of California, were reviewed by Track Info Services for sites located within 0.25 mile of the subject property. This list was most recently updated on June 2, 2004. The information compiled by Track Info Services was reviewed to check for the inclusion of the subject property and adjacent facilities. Certified Unified Program Agency (COPA) A Certified Unified Program Agency (COPA) is a local agency that has been certified by the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement six (6) state environmental programs. Track Info Services collects and maintains information regarding underground storage tanks from several of the CUPA's in the State of California. Information obtained from the following CUPA's was reviewed by Track Info Services for sites located in the vicinity of the subject site. County of Riverside Environmental Health Department 7.3 Summary of Listed Sites Presented below is a summary of the sites identified during the compilation of the databases discussed above. Each of the identified sites is followed by a listing of the databases on which it appears. We have also included a summary of relevant information provided by the applicable regulatory agency in the Track Info Services report. It should be noted that the Track Info Services report may include sites which are actually beyond the ASTM -specified search radii. These sites are not Included below; information regarding these sites can be found In the text of the Track Info Services report. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Project No SouthPaagege 222hern California Geotachnical . 04 2 Unknown Riverside Drive at Laguna Avenue ERNS This site is located 0.00± miles from the subject site. On (2) gallons of drug lab material was illegally dumped Riverside Drive and Laguna Avenue. The impact we groundwater was not affected. Elsinore Hiah School #4 Riverside Drive at Grand Avenue State Site March 24, 1996, two at the intersection of s limited to soil, and This site is located 0.01± miles northeast of the subject site. The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) entered into an Environmental Oversight Agreement with the Lake Elsinore Unified School District to provide oversight for a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) for the proposed high school. Butterfield Trailer Park 32900 Riverside Drive UST Site o This site is located 0.01± miles southeast of the subject site. This property contains one underground storage tank. No leaks have been reported at this site. Single Family Residence, 15248 Paradise Cove ERNS This site is located 0.04± miles to the northeast of the subject site. On April 11, 2001, a barrel covered with an unknown oily substance was illegally dumped in the surrounding neighborhood. The barrel was removed by Riverside County Fire Department. Single Family Residence 15248 Paradise Cove ERNS This site is located 0.043 miles northeast of the subject site. On December 31, 2001, unknown oils were spilled. The impact was limited to soil, and groundwater was not affected. The oil was removed by Riverside County Fire Department. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California $out California Geotechnical Project No. 04EI06.3 Page 23 Simile Family Residence 33080 Jamieson Street . ERNS This site is located 0.07± miles southwest of the subject site. On February 17, 1996, two (2) gallons of methamphetamine was illegally dumped. The impact was limited to soil, and groundwater was not affected. Bridgecreek Development 15410 Grand Avenue • LUST Site This site is located 0.08± miles northwest of the subject site. A release from an underground diesel storage tank was identified at this site on November 14, 1989. The impact affected both the soil and groundwater. A closure letter for this site was issued by the local agency on August 2, 2002. Aston Texaco 15883 Grand Avenue LUST Site This site is located 0.36± miles southeast of the subject site. A release from an underground gasoline storage tank was identified at this site on April 5, 1993. The impact affected only the soil. A closure letter for this site has not been issued. The current status of the site, as indicated by Regional Board, is a remediation plan. Morris Jean 15076 Grand Avenue . LUST This site is located 0.4± miles northwest of the subject site. A release from an underground diesel storage tank was identified at this site on June 8, 1990. The impact affected the soil only. A closure letter for this site was issued by the local agency on May 1, 1991. 7.4 File Review As part of our investigation, we were provided with a copy of the underground storage tank removal report. This report which is applicable to the subject site is summarized below: 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Protect No Southern California Geotechnical . 0Page 24 24 Pag prepared by ICG Hydrotech, Inc., 02. 1990, Job No. 27 -8247 -001 -01 - In a report referenced above, prepared by ICG Hydrotech, indicated there were four USTs previously present at the subject site. Two UST's were located in the north area of Parcel 1 and two UST's were located in the east area of Parcel 2. The USTs previously present on Parcel 1 consisted of one 1,000 -gallon gasoline UST and one 1,000 gallon diesel UST. Two 500 -gallon automotive fuel UST were previously present at Parcel 2. On March 27, 1990, ICG Hydrotech indicated that they observed the removal of underground storage tanks located on Parcels 1 and 2. Environmental sampling of in situ soils adjacent to the former USTs was subsequently conducted. Results of the sampling performed at the subject site indicated 83 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of diesel fuel within a sample collected at 2 feet below grade beneath the UST on Parcel 1. Within both Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, benzene, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene were also detected at concentrations between 6 and 25 parts per billion in samples collected at 2 feet and 6 feet below grade beneath the former USTs. This report was submitted to the County of Riverside Department of Health. The County of Riverside Department of Health determined that no significant contamination existed and that no further site mitigation would be required at both sites. The County of Riverside Department of Health issued a closure letter on May 15, 1990. A copy of this letter is enclosed in Appendix E of this report. 7.5 Conclusions Information obtained by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., during the regulatory agency records review, does not suggest the presence of any recognized environmental conditions at the subject site. Four (4) ERNS sites have been identified within 1/8 mile radius of the subject site. All of the releases are indicated to have only affected the soil and not the groundwater. The substances released were removed from the location by Riverside County Fire Department. There is no evidence to suggest that these ERNS sites have adversely impacted the environmental conditions at the subject site. The future Elsinore High School #4, located 0.01± mile northeast of the subject site, was investigated by the DTSC as part of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment. The PEA concludes that there is no evidence to suggest that this facility has impacted the soil or groundwater of the subject site. 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04EI06.3 p'�p Page 25 Three (3) leaking underground storage tank sites have been identified within a Yz - mile radius of the subject site. Closure letters have been issued for two of the sites indicating that no further action is necessary. Investigation is ongoing at the third site which is located 0.36± miles southeast of the subject site. This release is indicated to have affected the soil only. There is no evidence to suggest that this facility has impacted the soils or groundwater of the subject site. Furthermore, the responsible party at this site has been identified and there is no significant likelihood that the owners of the subject site will be involved in a cleanup action at this LUST site. The four USTs that were previously present on the subject site were removed. A report prepared by ICG Hydrotech observed the removal of the storage tanks and also tested the soil surrounding the former USTs. ICG Hydrotech issued a report to the County of Riverside Environmental Health Department. The County of Riverside Environmental Health Department determined that no significant contamination existed at the subject site and that no further site mitigation would be required. A closure letter was issued on May 15, 1990, indicating that no further action is required. 336 Unit Residential Development—Lake Elsinore, California Southern California GuotechnlcPage 26�al Protect No. 0 Page 26 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site located at the comer of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue in Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., has endeavored to perform this ESA in substantial conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E1527-00 with exceptions to and deletions from the above referenced standard described in section 3.2 of this report. The ESA has provided no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions may affect the property. A summary of the findings and conclusions of this study is presented below: The subject site is currently vacant and undeveloped except for the existing sidewalk that trends north -south on the western area of Parcel 1, the water well in the southwest area of Parcel 1, and the above ground storage tank and concrete wall located in the southwestern corner of Parcel 2 . The City of Lake Elsinore has a record of a demolition permit for the address of 32789 Riverside Drive (Parcel 1) issued in 1992. No other building permits were issued from the City of Lake Elsinore of the County of Riverside for any of the remaining parcels. Review of historic aerial photographs indicates the presence of a single family residence structure in the northeast comer of Parcel 1 during the 1960's through the 1980's. This structure was demolished in 1992. A single family residence structure was also located in the southeast area of Parcel 2. This structure was established between 1974 and 1980 and was demolished some time between 1990 and 1995. Parcel 1 through Pacrel 3 has historically been used for agricultural purposes. Parcel 4 has historically remained vacant of any structures. There are no records of any environmental mismanagement associated with these formerly existing structures. Based on these factors, there is no evidence to suggest that the soil and/or groundwater of the subject property has been impacted with hazardous substances as a result of past subject property usage. 2. No evidence of hazardous substances, environmental mismanagement, underground storage tanks or other adverse environmental conditions were observed during our reconnaissance of the subject site or the immediately adjacent properties. Based on the site reconnaissance, there is no evidence to suggest that the soil and/or groundwater of the subject site property has been impacted with hazardous substances. 3. The subject site is located within an area primarily developed with residential and commercial properties. Only one of the immediately adjacent properties currently operates USTs. The Butterfield Village mobile home park is located 336 Unit Residential oevelopment — lake Elsinore, California Southern California Geotechnical Project No. 04Ei06-3 r, Page 27 across Riverside Drive and is hydrogeologically down gradient from the subject site. Therefore, it is unlikely for this facility to potentially impact the subject site. 4. Four (4) ERNS sites have been identified within 1/8 mile radius of the subject site. All of the releases are indicated to have only affected the soil and not the groundwater. The substances released were removed from the location by Riverside County Fire Department. There is no evidence to suggest that these ERNS sites have adversely impacted the environmental conditions at the subject site. 5. The four USTs that were previously present on the subject site were removed. Two 1,000 -gallon gasoline tanks were located on Parcel 1, and two 500 -gallon fuel tanks were located on Parcel 2. A report prepared by ICG Hydrotech observed the removal of the storage tanks and also tested the soil surrounding the former USTs. ICG Hydrotech issued a report to the County of Riverside Environmental Health Department. The County of Riverside Environmental Health Department determined that no significant contamination existed at the subject site and that no further site mitigation would be required. A closure letter was issued on May 15, 1990 indicating that no further action is required. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Protect No Sooffiern Callfarola GeofPage echnlcal . 04 Page 28 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, we provide the following recommendations: • Although the County of Riverside Department of Health issued a closure letter in regards to the UST sites located on Parcel i and Parcel 2, residual contaminants may exist at depths of 10 to 20t feet at the removed UST locations. It is recommended that any disturbance to the soils near the demolished USTs during grading be limited, as this could necessitate additional testing. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Southern Calif omla Geetechnlcat Project No. 04E106-3 Li19y® Page 29 10.0 GENERAL COMMENTS A Phase I ESA comprises a number of individual elements whose basic nature and extent are determined in accordance with the standard of care applicable to Phase I ESAs. The standard of care is commonly defined as the care applied by the ordinary practitioner at the time and in the area where the ESA was performed. We believe that we have complied with the applicable standard of care, and that we have complied as well with the Phase I ESA guidelines presented by ASTM. Note that our services intentionally did not include any inquiries with respect to asbestos, lead paint, radon, methane, and wetlands. The accompanying report is an instrument of service of Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., for the exclusive use of the named clients. No parties other than the clients are permitted by us to rely upon this instrument of service. By their reliance, the named clients consent to the terms and conditions of the contract executed by Classic Pacific, referenced in Section 3.1 of this report. This report summarizes our findings and relates our opinions with respect to the potential for hazardous materials to exist at the site at levels likely to warrant mitigation pursuant to current regulatory guidelines established by the USEPA or the State of California. Note that our findings and opinions are based on information that we obtained on given dates through records review, site review, and related activities. It is possible that other information exists or subsequently has become known, as it is possible for the conditions we observed to have changed after our observation. The conclusions presented in this report were based on available information pertaining to various points in time and were presented by others for our use or were based on informal discussion with various agency personnel. We do not warrant the accuracy of information supplied by others. For these and associated reasons, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., cannot under any circumstances warrant or guarantee that not finding indicators of hazardous materials means that hazardous materials do not exist on the site. Hazardous substances include any substance that the USEPA or the State of California has designated for special considerations under the Toxic Substances Control Act, Clean Air Act, or Clean Water Act, as defined under Section 101 (14) of CERCLA, as well as any hazardous waste under RCRA, and constituents of petroleum products. The conclusions in this report may rely on others credibility and, therefore, any alteration in documentation or verbal information obtained may result in the redirection of the conclusions presented in this report, The conclusions are also based on visual field observations performed within the property boundaries at this specific point in time and, therefore, do not include the potential for hazardous substances present within undocumented fills placed on the subject property or adjacent properties. 336 Unit Residential Development— Lake Elsinore, California Protect No. 0 Southern California 0800011111C811Page 30 Page 3D APPENDIX A SITE LOCATION MAP SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE APPENDIX a TRACK INFO SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL FIRST SEARCH REPORT TRACK >-INFO SERVICES, LLC Environmental First5earch TM Report PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 job Number: LKELSINORE PREPARED FOR: Southern California Geotechnical 1260 North Hancock Street, Suite 101 Anaheim, CA 92807 10-28-04 Tel: (323) 664-9981 Fax: (323) 664-9982 EnvironmenW FirsiSmrch is e,cgistmsd usdcm * of FintSearth Txhoolugy Corpontiom All tighis merved. Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius from Area Single Map: PROP. 336 RES. UNITSJOMLINSON PROPERTY, LAKE ELSINORE CA K:3 Source: U.S. Cen TIGER Fila O A Polyg. .._. Idardlried Slu, Mplc SiW, R+ pm, U A NPL, U..Nuld. Solid W. l.mdrdl(SWL) m It + .Ww __.,.......� Biu# Rlnyt ftepeemot Na Mile A+dii: 14d Minn xcprnenu SRb IL Radiw Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius from Area e ASTM: NPL, RCRACOR,STATE PROP. 336 RES. UNITS•TOMLINSON PROPERTY, LAKE ELSINORE CA Source: U.S. (.Censor TIGER File M. palyyov._._._.-_...._......._...............__.... Idmtlw sum, M.Iupk slum. Httcpm. ........... . .�--- NPL P,ownficid.solidWu L�odNl(SWL)ar"I-ldWl Wmm....�......._.I� BUck RiniNcpm,w,Ild Mllc WJ; Hcd HinFH'f" U5(Nrlt.H04iw Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius from Area E" ASTM: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY, LAKE ELSINORE CA hinc St R !! ra H s0 4g Macla St 2 r a'ye C 3 Mae��a r r pD® a 3 rd6 e8 0 G0 yin sr a 0$ 7 r�/fid r 'Y k �4?rbj s / rM rq"ra 6 r'wj Ve ii 9i Rey !!sh Source; U.S. Ce=w TIGER Filer Arta Polyten___...._..___.........__.__..._......_ IdmUCN Site, Multiple Sitee. Racpbr _...._......_..___ r a A ® NPL. Rtoanrwld. Solid Wane LWAMI (SWL) or Hod. Wanc.__......... Railmd.—__.......... ___.__—........_.____,...... ....... ....._ Blick Aiuy Rayrt+eol ld Mik Radii; kcd lung HcPrcur�u SOUw Rodluc C4 1 Environmental FirstSearch P .25 Mile Radius from Area ASTM: RCRAGEN, UST, OTHER PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY, LAKE ELSINORE CA !a <e �s m ry a �8 eP m h'eab, �S- Tom, !ry ryry �fo4h�a! r��tb �4 a < n I I Source: U.S. Cense 77GFR Files Mu Polyym..........__.___._.__........._....- I&WIfed sift, M.WPk 5I1µ Ratpbr....__._.._.___ NPL. Brvwvf¢M, SoIN Wutt LrndfJl (SWC) or Hawdau WaUe ..�.._._. _.� RrVLaG......__._._._...r._.__....._............................ _...... _ Bbct Rkp Rtprc 114 MM, Radii; Ra RinC Rr7 =c $W ft. Rnlw Environmental FirstSearch .12 Mlle Radius from Area e ASTM: NFRAP, SPILLS90, ERNS, RCRANLR, PERMITS PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY, LAKE ELSINORE CA y 4 G� 1*q c oe��ol G y� A� LQ y8jj'%°o `m3 O °'Pi dfi �Oa a Source: U.S. Census TIGER Flfes O I&WIr" SRc, M.Hipk Sjk&Rmrybf a _...-_.__...._ NPL, Brown(eW Solid W.. I--M11)SWL)orH wda Want_.__..__.® 046 tU pRsp .W Mil, Wii: RN Riup Rcp,o USM&RW,w Environmental FirsiSearch Search Summary Report Target Site: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 FirstSearch Summa Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 114 112 112> ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 09-12.04 1DD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 09-13.04 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 NPRAP Y 06.23-04 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 RCRA TSD Y 09.12.04 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 D 0 RCRA COR Y 09.12.04 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA GEN Y DR -12-04 025 0 0 0 - - RCRA NLR Y 07.12-04 0.12 0 0 - • 0 0 3 ERNS Y 12-31-03 0.12 1 2 - - 0 state Sites Y 03-02-04 1.00 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 Spills -1990 Y 07-01.03 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 SWL Y 10-11-04 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 Permits Y 02.11-04 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 0 Other Y 03.02-04 025 0 0 0 - - 0 REG USTIAST Y 06-02-04 0.25 0 1 0 - - 0 1 3 Leaking UST Y 05-26.04 0.50 0 1 0 2 - 0 -TOTALS- 2 4 0 2 0 1 9 Notice of Uisciettter Due to the limiudotu, oautmiNs, inescurecies and ineompiererseu of gsraamment intomxdon and was oval B dam= residing available m TRACK Info Services, remain conventions have been utliud in preparing the locations of all federal. state and to W agency atte+rtsidiog in TRUCK Info ScrAccss 4 -c -Isms. All EPA NPL and ante landfill site ate depicted by a rectaca a apptozvuating their location and situ. The boundaries of the recnngles represent the carom and western most IonginWes: the northern and southern occur latitudes. As such, the mopped areas may ascot the aauai areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of thea propemia. All oder sits arc depicted by a point mpseserging their apprnairnae ddrest locadun set make ro anempt to rcV Beni the acwl sew of the aeacismd property. Acwl boundmia snd loudoae of individual properties can be found in the Nes raiding ad the agency responsible f"Jacch Rnfommdon. Waiver of LiablUty Uthough TRUCK Info Smites uses its but effone to research the actual location of each site, TRACK [do Services does not and an rpt,,mann the accuracy of those sites with regard to sect location and sae. All audwriad Users of TRACK info Services's smires noceeding are signifying an understanding ofTRACK Info Services's $=lung and mapping convention, and agree to waive arty and all ability chums associated with search and imp results showing incomplete and or irutt+umc we locadcax Environmental FirstSearch Site Information Report Request Date: 10-28-04 Search Type: AREA Requestor Name: Daryl Kas-So.Cal.Geotech. Job Number: LKELSINORE Standard: ASTM Filtered Report TARGET ADDRESS: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Demographics Sites: 9 Non-Geocoded: I Population: NA Radon: NA Site Location Degrees (Decimall Degrees (Min/See) UTMs Longitude: -117.387138 -117:23:14 Easting: 464107.02 Latitude: 33.662624 33:39:45 Northing: 3724623.283 Zone: 11 Comment: Comment Additional Requests/Services Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELKNORP LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 TOTAL: 9 GEOCODED: 8 NON GEOCODED: I SELECTED: 0 Pae No. DB Type Site Natne/ID/Statas Address DistlDir Ma ID I ERNS RIVERSIDE DR,AND LAGUNA 0.00— 2 499775 JAJJNKNOW14(EPA REGIONS LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 STATE ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL M4 GRAND AVENUFMVERSIDE DRIV 0.00— 4 2 CAL33010016NOLUNTARY CLEANUP PR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92.530 4 UST BUTTERFIELD TRAILER PARR 32900 RIVERSIDE DR 0.01 SE 5 RIVERSMECO87575 Lake Elsiaom CA 92530 5 ERNS RESIDENTIAL 15248 PARADISE COVE 0.04 NE I NRC4626571FD:ED LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 9 ERNS UNKNOWN 33080 JAMISON Sr- APARTMEN 0.07 NE 3 493150NN1CNOWN(NRQ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 10 LOST BRIDGECREEK DEVELOPMENT 15410 GRAND AVE 0.08 NW 7 T06065001611CASE CLOSED LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 12 LUST ASTONS TEXACO 15883 GRAND AVE 0.36 SE 6 T06%500323/REWDIATION PLAN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 14 LUST MORRIS, JEAN 15076 GRAND AVE 0.40 NW 8 TMN5001951CASE CLOSED LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 Environmental FirsiSearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 TOTAL: 9 GEOCODED: 8 NON GEOCODED: I SELECTED: 0 Page No DS Type Site Name/ID/Status Address DlstfDir Map ID 16 STATE MIDDLE SCHOOL NO.5 18690$ 18730 GRAND AVENUE NON GC CAL33010039/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Environmental FirsGSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS•TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELUNIORE CA 92530 Yie DetaiLs Page - I EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIMCATION SITE DLST/DIR: 0.00 — MAP ID: 2 SEARCH D): 2 REV: /24196 NAME: UNKNOWN ADDRESS: RIVERSIDE DR. AND 4 97751 LAGUNA IDI: 497751 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92536 ID=' STATUS: UNKNOWN (EPA REGIONS) RI �� PHONE: CONTACT: SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPD.IL: 3124/1996 TIMEOFSPILL: 1605 PRODUCT RELEASED (1): DRUG LAB MATERIAL QUANTITY (3): 2 UNITS (1): GAL PRODUCT RELEASED (2): QUANTITY (1): UNITS (2): PRODUCT RELEASED M! QUANTITY (3): UNITS (3): UEDI IMlMEWA AFFPCTED AIB: NO GROUNDWATER: NO LAND: YES FIXED FACILITY% NO WATER: NO OTHER: NO WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING: YES EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATORERROR: NO NO OTHER CAUSE: NO TRANSP. ACCIDENT: UNKNOWN: NO ACTIONSTAKEN: C/UBY CO FD. RELEASEDETECTION: UNKNOWNR.LEGALDUWING MISC. NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID: 497751 DUN & BRADSTREET*: TYPE OF DLSCHARGER: UNKNOWN NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNKNOWN ADDRESS: Yie DetaiLs Page - I Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Site Delails Page - 2 STATESFM SEARCH H3: 4 DIST/AIR: 0.00— MAP ID: 4 NAME: ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL M4 REV: 031OVO4 ADDRESS: GRAND AVENUFJRIVERSIDE DRIVE IDI: CAL33010016 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 IDI: RIVERSIDE STATUS: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM CONTACT: PHONE: OTHER SITE NAIin (hillikbelow- notmoorUd by aeanov) HIGHSCHOOLSTIENO. 7 (PROPOSED) LIAEELSINORE UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT HIGHSCHOOL SITENO. 4 /PROPOSED) ELSINORE HIGHSCHOOL M ELSINORE HIGHSCHOOL "(PROPOSED) QENERAL SITE INFORMATION File Name (If different than site to neI: ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL "(PROPOSED) SUM: VOLUNTARYCLEANUP PROGRAM AWP SlteType: PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE PROPERTY NPLSRe: Fund: Slams Date: 11292000 Lead: DEPTOF =C SURSrANCES CONTROL Stag: JASRAHAdf DTSC Region &RWQCB X: CYPRESS Branch: SCHOOL EVALUATION RWQCB: Site Access: Groondwater Comasntaation: Number o(Sourw Contributing to Contamination at the She: 0 OTHER AGENCY m NUMDERS(blank Wl W SOURCE NAME, &VALUE: of Trod by a_ t CALSTARS CODE 404117-11 RACKGRIQ MO INFORMATION (li kbel -tmt reourtcd by aeencv) INFORMATION ON SPECIAL PROGRAMS THE SITE IS ASSOCIATED WITH (black bely w not rmrjelI ba ra) PROJECTED ACTIVMES (blank below not Tena reed by APIPCA) Activity: LSE, IORSE, FFA, FFSRA, VCA, EA Activity Stam: VOLUNPARYCLFINUP PROGRAM Completion Due Date: Revised Completion Due Date: Date Activity Actually Completed: 01312000 Yards of SoDds Removed: 0 Yards of Solids Treated: 0 Gallons of Liquid Removed: 0 -Condatted onn wpage- Site Delails Page - 2 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TAPGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 STATE SITE SEARCH ID: 4 DISTIVIR: 0.00- MAP ID: 4 NAME: ELSINORE HIGH SCIfO0L a4 REV: 03/02/04 ADDRESS: GRAND AVENUFMVERSIDE DRIVE IDI: CAL33010016 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 I132, RIVERSIDE STATUS: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM CONTACT: PHONE: Gallons of Liquid Treated: Aedvlty: Activity Slants: Completion Doe Date: Herhed Completion Due Date: Data AWvlty Actually Completed: Yards otSollds Removed: Yards o(S lids Treated: Gamma of liquid Removed: GaRom of Liquid Treated: 0 LSE, SORSE, FFA, FFSRA, WA, EA VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM 11292000 0 0 0 0 ITTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (b kb90 t"122Md DE 201 Comments Data: 05242001 On November 22, 2000. DISC approvd ibe PEA Workplan. DTSCatterd into an Environmental Ou ight Agreemem (Docket No. IMA 99/00.174) with Lake Elsinore Untfwd School Dilate, m prmu i, ovrntghtfara Preliminary £ndangeoment Assettmentfor the propmedHigh School No. 3 tilt DTSCamendd Envhonmenml Ow sigh, Agreement (EOA) (Docket No. AM -A 99/00.174) to (Docket No. HS1•A 99 -00.174 -Amended) due to one.changefmm Nigh School Na, 30 High School No. 4, The BOA, mwdinto byD7SCand La.k Fbinora UnifiedSch. Dt=hz1 jr to provlde ov tghlfara PrelhnbmryEndangermentAssessmentforthe pmpmd High SchoolNa.4. Site Details Page - 3 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UMTS-TOMUNSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 5 DLSTMER: 0.01 SE MAP ID: 5 NAME: BUTTERFIELD TRAILER PARK REV: 04/06/2001 ADDRESS: 32900 RIVERSIDE DR IDt: PJVERSIDECO87575 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 ID2: Riv ide STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE Site Details Page - 4 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Site Details Page - 5 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SITE SEARCH ID: I DISTMIR: 0.04 NE MAP ID: I NAME: RESIDENTIAL REV: 1273 U01 ADDRESS: 15248 PARADISE COVE m1: NRC -562657 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 m2: RIVERSIDE STATUS: FIXED CONTACT: UNKNOWN PHONE: SITEINFORMATION THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER DATERECEIVED: li•APR-01 DATE COMPLCTE I1 -APR -01 CALLTAKER: TWV9270 CALL TYPE: INC RESPONSIBLE PARTY: UNKNOWN PHONENI: PHONE N2: PHONE 93: RESPONSIBLE COMPANY: ORGANIZATION TYPE: UNKNOWN ADDRESS: XX INITIALLY REPORTED BY: PHONE: IMT REPORTED COMPANY: ONBEHALFOF: N SOURCEt TELEPHONE INCIDENT INFORMATION INCIDENTOESCTUPTION: THE CALLER IS REPORTING THAT A GREEN STEEL BARREL HAS BEEN DUMPED IN HER NEIGHBORHOOD AND LS COVERED WITH ABLACK OILY SUBSTANCE, INCWENf TYPE+ FEW INCIDENT CAUSE: DUMPING INCIDENT DATE: 10 -APR -01 INCIDENT DATE DESC: DISCOVERED DISTANCE FROM CITY: DISTANCE UNTIE: DIRECTION FROM CITY: LOCATIONSECTION: LOCATION TOWNSHIP: LOCATION RANGE: WHO CHEM FLAG: F RAD FLAG: F BIO FLAG: F OIL FLAG: T POTENTIAL -FLAG; ADIT MATERIAL FLAG: MILTTARYORGRAG: N LNG FLAG: AIRCRAFTTYPE: AIRCRAFT MODE4 AIRCRAFTID: AIRCRAFT FUEL CAPACTIY: AIRCRAFT FUEL CAPACITY UNITS: AIRCRAFT FUEL ON BOARD: AIRCRAFT FUEL ON BOARD UNITS: ADtCRAF[ SPOT NUMBER: AIRCRAFT HANGER: AIRCRAFT RUNWAY NUM: ROAD MILE MARKER: BUILDING Ill: TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT: OTHER POWER GEN FACILITY: N GENERATING CAPACITY: TYPE OF FUEL: - Continued on new page - Site Details Page - 5 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET Srm PROP, 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLtNSON PROPERTY JOB-. LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Site Details Page - 6 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SITE SEARCH ID: I DISTIDIR: 0.04 NE MAP HJ: I NAME: RFSIDENIAL REV: 12/31/01 ADDRESS: 15248 PARADISE COVE IDI: NRC -562657 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 D)2: RIVERSIDE STATUS: FIXED CONTACT: UNKNOWN PHONE: NPOES: NPOES COMPLIANCE: U PIPELINE TYPE: DOTREGULATEM U PIPELINE ABOVE GROUND: ABOVE EXPOSED UNDERWATER: N PIPELINE COVERED: U RAILROAD HOTLINE: GRADE CROSSING: N LOCATION SUBDIVISION: RAILROAD MILEPOST: TYPE VEHICLE INVOLVED! CROSSING DEVICE TYPE: DEVICE OPERATIONAL: Y DOT CROSSING NUMBER: BRAKE FAILURE: N TANK ABOVE GROUND: ABOVE TRANSPORTABLE CONTAINER U TANK REGULATED: U TANK REGULATED BY: TANK M: CAPACITY OFTANK: CAPACITY OF TANK UNITS: ACTUAL AMOUNT: ACTUAL AMOUNT UNITS: PLATFORM RIG NAME: PLATFORM LETTER LOCATION AREA ID: LOCATION BLOCK ID: DESCRIPTION OF TANK: OCSG NUMBER OCSP NUMBER STATE LEASE NUMBER: PIER DOCK NUMBER BERTH SLIP NUMBER: CONTIN RELEASE TYPE: INITIAL CONT RELEASE NUM: CONT RELEASE PERMIT: ALLISION: N TYPE OFSTRUCTURE: STRUCTURE NAME: STRUCT OPERATIONAL: U AIRBAG DEPLOYED: DATE NORMAL SERVICE: SERVICE DISRUPT TIME: SERVICE DISRUPT UMTS: TRANSIT BUS FLAG: CR BEGIN DATE: CR END DATE: CR CHANGE DATE: FIRE INVOLVED: N FIRE EXTINGUISHED: U ANY EVACUATIONS: N NU51BER EVACUATED: WHOEVACUATED: RADIUS OF EVACUATION: ANY INJUREM: N NUMBERINJURED: NUMBER HOSPITALIZED: ANY FATALITIES: N NUMBER FATALITIES: ANY DAMAGES: N DAMAGE AMOUNT: AIR CORRIDOR CLOSED: N AIR CORRIDOR DESC: AIR CLOSURE TIME: WATERWAY CLOSED: N WATERWAY DISC: - WATERWAY CLOSURE TIME: ROAD CLOSED: N ROAD DESC: ROAD CLOSURE TIME: CLOSURE DIRECTION: MAJORARTERY: N TRACK CLOSED: N TRACK DESC: TRACK CLOSURE TIME MEDIA INTERPST: NONE MEDIUM DESC. LAND ADDTL MEDIUM INFO: SOUL RODY OF WATER TRIBUTARY OF: NEAREST RIVER MILE MARK: RELEASESECURED: N EST DUR OF RELEASE: RELEASE RATE: TRACK CLOSE DIR: ST AGENCY ON SCENE: ST AGENCY RPT NUM: OTHER AGENCY NOTIFIED: - Continued on nw page - Site Details Page - 6 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP, 336 RES, UNITS.TOMLIJSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SUE ?� SEARCH ID: l DISTRIIR: 0.04 NE MAP ID: i DESCOF REMEDIAL ACTION: EMPL FATALITY: COMMUNITY IMPACT: EMPLOYEE INJURIES: OCCUPANT FATALITY: ROAD CLOSURE UNITS: SHEEN SIZE UNITS: FED AGENCY NOTIFIED: TYPE OFSTRUCIURE: STRUCTURE OPERATIONAL: SHEEN SIZE LENGTH: SHEEN SIZE WIDTH: OFFSHORE: RELEASE RATE UNIT: ADDITIONAL INFO: CHRIS CODE: UN NUMBER NO CORRECTIVE ACTION SEEN PASS FATALITY: N WINDSPEEDUNTIS: PASSENGER INJURIES: CURRENT SPEED UNITS: TRACK CLOSURE UNITS: STATE AGENCY NOTIFIED: STRUCTURE NAME: ALLISION: NEAREST RIVER MILE MARK: N SHEEN SIZE LENGTH UNITS: SHEEN SIZE WIDTH UNITS: DURATION UNIT: RELEASE RATE RATE: NRC WATCHSTANDER ADVISED PERSONTO CONTACT LOCAL FIRE DEPT. OUN CASE NUMRER: 00000"" REACHED WATER: NO NAME OF MATERIAL: UNKNOWN OIL AMOUNT OF MATERIAL: 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT AMOUNT IN WATER- . I. I A tga F.1 I q: IQ If)', Site Details Page - 7 REV: 17f31101 NAME: RESIDENTIAL HSI: NRC.562657 ADDRESS: 15748 PARADISE COVE IM: LAKE ELSINORE CA 97539 STATUS: FIXED RIVERSIDE PHONE: CONTACT: UNKNOWN WEATHER CONDITIONS: OVERCAST 68 AIRTEMRECT WIND ONE. WIND SPEED: U SHEEN 5ME: WATER SUPPLY CONTMS: DIR OF SHEEN TRAVEL' SHEEN COLOR: WAVECONDTTON: SHEEN ODOR DESCRIPTION: CURRENT DIRECTION: CURRENT SPEED: WATER TEMPERATURE: DESCOF REMEDIAL ACTION: EMPL FATALITY: COMMUNITY IMPACT: EMPLOYEE INJURIES: OCCUPANT FATALITY: ROAD CLOSURE UNITS: SHEEN SIZE UNITS: FED AGENCY NOTIFIED: TYPE OFSTRUCIURE: STRUCTURE OPERATIONAL: SHEEN SIZE LENGTH: SHEEN SIZE WIDTH: OFFSHORE: RELEASE RATE UNIT: ADDITIONAL INFO: CHRIS CODE: UN NUMBER NO CORRECTIVE ACTION SEEN PASS FATALITY: N WINDSPEEDUNTIS: PASSENGER INJURIES: CURRENT SPEED UNITS: TRACK CLOSURE UNITS: STATE AGENCY NOTIFIED: STRUCTURE NAME: ALLISION: NEAREST RIVER MILE MARK: N SHEEN SIZE LENGTH UNITS: SHEEN SIZE WIDTH UNITS: DURATION UNIT: RELEASE RATE RATE: NRC WATCHSTANDER ADVISED PERSONTO CONTACT LOCAL FIRE DEPT. OUN CASE NUMRER: 00000"" REACHED WATER: NO NAME OF MATERIAL: UNKNOWN OIL AMOUNT OF MATERIAL: 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT AMOUNT IN WATER- . I. I A tga F.1 I q: IQ If)', Site Details Page - 7 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SUE SEARCH ID: 3 DMIDIR: 0.07 NE ASAP ID: 3 NAME: UNKNOWN REV: 3!17196 ADDRESS: 33080 JAMISON ST. -APARTMENTS M5@6 MI: 493150 LAKE ELSINORE CA 93530 ID2: RnmideSTATUS: UNKNOWN (NRC) CONTACT: PHONE: SPIEL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL: 3/17/1996 TIMEOFSPILL: 1400 PRODUCT RELEASED (1): ACID(DRUG WASTE) QUANTITY (11: 3 UNITS (1)! GAL PRODUCT RELEASED (3): QUANTITY (3): UNITS (3): PRODUCT RELEASED (3): QUANTITY (3)z UNITS (3): MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTEO ,AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: NO LAND:NO FIXED FACILITY: YES WATER: NO OTHER: NO WATERBODY ARFECTED BY RELEASE: CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATORERROR: NO OTHER CAUSE: YES TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO UNKNOWN: N(1 ACTIONSTAKEN: DTSCTOCN RELEASEOE7ECTION: RESIDENCE SHERIFF OFFICER DISCOVERED SOME WASTE PRODUCTS IN AN ABANDONED APARTMENT COMPLEX WHME QUESTIONING ASUSPECT ON A STOLEN BIKE MISC.NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID: 493150 DUN h BRADSTREET 0: TYPE OF DISCHARGER, UM040WN NAME OF DISCHARGER. UNKNOWN ADDRESS: Site Details Page - 8 Environmental Firsdeareh Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. ELAUA g SOOMLMON PROPERTY ,TOB; LKELSINORE P.SINO.0CI LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 7 DIST/OHL• 0.08 NW MAP ID: 7 NAME: BEIDGECREEK DEVELOPMENT REV: 05416107 ADDRESS: 15410 GRAND AVE IDI: 70606500167 LAKE Pt gINORE CA 92370 ID2: RIVERSIDE STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: REI EASE DATA FROM DIE.CALIFORNIA STATE WATER R¢SOItRfI'S CONTROL BOARD LU.STifi DATABASE Please note thaisome data previously provided by the State Water Resource., Control Board W she LUS775databare k not cunemay bctng provided by the agency In the most recent edition, incidew that occvrrddatlng after the year 2000 may nal how much informudan. Fled headers with blank Information following aficrahouldbe interpreted arunreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: ON LOCAL CASE NUMBER 891120 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: BRIDGECREEKDEVELOPAfENT ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 14550 AIAGNOLIA A VENUE, SUITE 205. WISTIONSTER, CA 92683 SITE OPERATOR WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 083301368T CASE TYPE: AQUIFERAFFECTED SUBSTANCE LEAKED: DIESEL SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: CORROSION LEAKSOURCE: TANK HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANKCLOSURE DATE DISCOVERED (bhinkif not rcparted): 1989.11.14 00:00:00 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blink If not reported): 1989-114400:00:00 STATUS: CASE CLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (pleat note that not in code traPdadotn have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (pleat nate that not all e,dc lraw4tlono have been provided by the reporting ,gawp): NONE TAKEN DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (honk U net reported): 196501.0100:00:00 ENTER DATE (blank If Pat reported): 1989-12.1100:00:00 REVIEW DATE (blankUnot repotted): 1999-084200:00.00 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (hlaka net reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank, Unot rcponed): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (111"k if 001 "Ported): 1989.12.2700:00.00 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank IT not reported): 1990-06-14 00.00:00 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): 1990-08-17 00:00:00 DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY @hank Ifnot reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank If ant npancd): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank It not reported): 1999-08-02 00:00:00 REPORT DATE (Wank U not reported[: 198942-2000:60A0 TBE DATA FROM THE CAI IFORNIA STATE WATER Rv_ URCES CONTROL BOARD LDSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of WstoriW Pralmum MTBE woae:Ptntlon): MTHE GROLINDWATER CONCEWRA71ON: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CMTS: 0 MTUE FUEL: 0 MTBETESTED: NOTRCQULRED TD BE TESTED MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 9 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 6 DISTIDIR: 0.36 SE MAP ID: 6 NAME: ASTON S TEXACO REV: 05/16104 ADDRESS: 158930RANDAVE IBI: T06065D0323 LAKE ELSINORE CA 91530 ID2: RIVERSIDE STATUS: REMEDIATION PLAN CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA TATE WATER RSSOURCESCONTROL BOARD I ISTIS DATABASE Plmvtmk Me' tomedampreWa,,r1ypoldedby Ne Smte Water Retourcer Canon!Soard N the LUSHSdatahmei wtcurrentlybcMgpmvlded bythe agency M Ne man recentdidamInrldmer TRW ocertrreddotinitaner the ywr 2000 may not have much infwmotmn. Field headers wlN blink in(vraaadon fnfbw6tgaffershuuld be interpreted= unmponedby the agency LEAD AGENCY: LOGLAGENCY REGIONAL BOARD: 08 LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 93315 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: ASTONSIEXACO ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 819 RUCnNGHAMDR.. REDLANDS CA 91374 SITE OPERATOR: WATER SYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 08 33 012 6 2 7 CASE TYPE: SOILONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: Lm LEAKSOURCE: PIPING HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: 0Af DATE DISCOVERED (bbnk If not reported): 1993-04-05 00:00:00 HOW LEAK WASSTOPPED: STOP DATE (bleak if not reported): STATUS: REMEDLITTONPLAN ABATEMENT METHOD (pleue nate that not -B code Rawladdw have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (pleue nate that not all code tnwladow have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank If not reported): ENTERDATE (blankif not reported): 1993-06.2100:00:00 REVIEW DATE (bluk Ifnet reported): 1997-04-0300.00:00 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (66nk Uaa( reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMIT -IED (btukU not mported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (Monk B net reported): 1993-08.12 00:00:00 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (black B not reported): 1993.12.18 00:00:D0 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank B not reported): 1993-12.18110:00:00 DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank B net reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank B not nported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank If not reported): REPORT DATE (blank Boot reported): 1993-05-1400:00:00 MTBE DATA FROM THE CAL )FORMA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD L SITS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Due of historical matlmem MTRE concentration): MTHE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTRE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CNIS: 0 MTHE FUEL: I MTBETESTED: SITE NOTTESTED FOR Af1BE, 1NCLUDFS UNENOWJAND NOTANALYZED AITHE CLASS: Site Details Page - 10 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. MTS•TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 1' SEARCH ID: 8 DIST/DIR: 0.40 NW MAP ID: 8 I[ 1 NAME: MORRIS, LEAN REV: 05116104 ADDRESS: 15076 GRAND AVE IDI: 7O606500195 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 ID2: RIVERSIDE STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE:RELEASE D61A FROM 3311; _ F W plea" note that some data Frc lourlyprovided by do Staff Waerliuourcer Cono., Board In the LUSnSdambare it not currently betngprovided by the agency In themorsrcant rdluan./nndenn that uea ed daung aflm fhe)wr 3000 may not hour much in%rmatlon. F7rldhradar nath blartt Infa mmim" foncuong cfferahauld be. lnterpreiedar unreported by the agenty- LEAD AGENCY: LOCALAGENCY i REGIONAL BOARD: 08 LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 90567 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: GARYAIORRIS ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 1940DINDUSTRLILCENWR RAY. USEELSINORE, CA 92330 SITE OPERATOR: WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 083301582T CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: DIESEL SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNK LEAK SOURCE: UNIT HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK CLOSURE DATE DISCOVERED (blanklf not reported): 1990-06.08 00:00;00 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blank B not reported): 1990A6.09 00:00.:00 STATUS: CASECLOSED '.. ABATEMENT METHOD (pkat note that not all code tnahtlom have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE(pleme note that not all code ttlatlaa have been provided by the reporting agency): NONE TAKEN ran DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blink It not reported): 1965-01-0100:00'00 ENTER DATE (blank floor reported): 1990-07-030010:00 REVIEW DATE (blank If not "parted): 19934f-0700,00:00 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blankUaor reported): DATE pRELIMENARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (black U not reported!: DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank it not reported): 1990.07-0600:00:00 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank R not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (biaak loot repa"ed): DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank Hout repotted): y DATE POST REMEDLAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank Hhot reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) Weak If not reported): 1991-05.0100:00:00 REPORT DATE (blankif net "ported): 1990-07-03 00:00:00 A FROA T1,FC tIFORIiA 6TATE WATER AFSOIraCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE_ MTBE DATE(Daee of hlrterinl matfmom MTBE concentratlne): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: !: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: `j MTBE CMTS: 0 MTBE FUEL 0 MTBETFSTED: NOT REQUIRED 70 BE 7ESTED MTBE CLASS: ' Site Details Page - 11 Environmental FirstSeareh Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Site Details Page - 12 STATE SITE SEARCH D): 9 DISTIDDR: NON GC MAP ID: NAME: MIDDLE SCHOOL NO. 5 REV: 03/07/04 ADDRESS: IBM& 18730 GRAND AVENUE IDI: CAU3010039 LAKE ELSINORE CA 97530 IDI: RIVERSIDE STATUS: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM CONTACT: PRONE: OTHER SITE NAMES @lank below. not resorted by aaenev) MIDDLESCHOOL NO. J (PROPOSED) LAKE ELSINORE UNFIED SCHOOL DMMCr MIDDLESCHOOL NO. J GENERAL SITE. INFORMATION Ftie Name (if dlt(efeat than she name): MIDDLESCHOOL NO,5 Sum: VOLUNTARYCLEANUP PR0ORA M AWP Sitelype: PROPOSED SCHOOL SM PROPERTY NPL Site! Fund: Swus Date: 07237001 Lead: DEPTOF TOK7CSUBSTANCES CONTROL SUIT: AORIEGA DTSCRetIoa&RWQCBO: CYPRESS Breach: SCHOOL EVALUA 770N RWQCB: Site Access: Groundwater Comtandnation: Number of Sources Contributing to Contamination at the Site: 0 QTffER AGENCY TONUMBERS fbiank below not rewrid try agency) ID SOURCE NAME,&VALUE: CALSrABSCODE404233-11 BACKGROUND INFORMATION (black bNow-mt mm"O by geenevl The 5lre rorulm ofoppraxlmarely 30aauy orcupkd byxvmdso-ucwrs. In addition there are many on-site buildings. ftblacatedfnaretdtullal and agriculpwlamnsvmundrdby raldenNaldwellinga as thesnu04..and north, a ad un, developed landm the awl. The Sim aur hQrorfcalfy sed for ar*uhure purposes, ddleanng the potential we afpeakldes or herbicides. INFORMATION ON SPECIALPRO- AMC THE SrMIS ASSOCIATED WrM(blank below not annorttd by agency) PROJECTED ACT1VT17P-S!blank below -not" orttd by agency) Activity: LSE, fORSA FFA, FFSRA, VCA, EA Activitystatua: VOLUMARYCLEANUP PROGRAM Completion Due Date: Revhed Completion Doe Date: Dote Activity Actually Compteted: 08011001 Yards of Salida Remond: 0 Yards ofSoOdt Treated: 0 GaBorn of Liquid Removed: 0 Gallant of Liquid Treated: 0 - Continued on nest page - Site Details Page - 12 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNITS-TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 STATE SUE SEARCH ID: 9 DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID: NAME: MIDDLE SCHOOL NO.5 REV: 03/01/09 ADDRESS: 18690 & 19730 GRAND AVENUE Wit CAL33010039 Due AcNHy Actually Compleled: LAKE ELSINORE CA 91530 ID2e STATUS: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Yards of SoNds Treated: RIVERSIDE Callow of Ligold Removed: 0 CONTACT: 0 PHONE:. PRELIMINARYENDANGERMENTA.SSWMENT Activey: DSE, MORSE, FFA, FFSX4, VCA, EA ACdvity Status: VOLUNTARYCLEINUP PROGRAM Completion Due Due: Revised Completion Due Due: Due AcNHy Actually Compleled: 07131001 Yards of SoNds Removed: 0 Yards of SoNds Treated: 0 Callow of Ligold Removed: 0 Callow of Liquid Treated: 0 Activity: PRELIMINARYENDANGERMENTA.SSWMENT Activlty5tarou VOLUNTARYCLEANUP PROGRAM Completion Due Dare: Revised Completion Due Date: Dau Activity Actu Y Completed: 05301001 Yards o(SoNds Removed: 0 Yards ofSoUdsTrtated: 0 Cusum of Liquid Removed: 0 Gallow of LIquld Treated: 0 Activit: SUPPLEMENTA"M INVESTIGATION (SCHOOLS ONLP) Activiy Status: VOL UNTARYCLEINUPPI? OGRAI Completion Due Date: Ravised Completion Due Date: Due ArtlNy ACMnOy Compltud: 01171003 Yards offioNds Removed: 0 Yards of SoNds Treated: 0 Colow of Liquid Removed: 0 GaOow ofLlquid Treated; 0 SC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS StTe tbL kbe: not r< n dew e 1 Comments Daft: 07131001 DISC entered Into a Voluntary Ckanap Agreement(Dar-tri Number HSA -A 00111I -I47 -Amended) with the Lake &&more Unified SchoolDstrice The purpose afthM Agement Lrforrhe Proponentmdevebp.and/mplemento RemovalAcdan Workplon(RAO), andotheractN/dea, under the oversight 0fD7SCtn an a bre to MdsfyD7SC+ r"ta"eaemt, mch that a No Further Remedbdon lamer aadSite Ceattftnan", regarding the pmp..dM!ddleSchmiNa.S.mybeobolnrdfromDnCD7SCenler d Imo an linviroamamml Oversight Agrremem (Docket No. HSA•A 00N1•Ia7) wdth Lake Elrblare, UnPedSchool Disoie toprovide ownight for a Preliminary 6ndangrrmene Ataarmeutfor the pmpased Middle School Na. S site, Site Details Page - 13 Environmental FirstSearch Federal Databases and Sources ASTM Databases: CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Iafermation system. The EPA's database of current and potential Superfund sites currently or previously under investigation. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updaced quarterly. CERCUS-NFRAP (Archive): Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System Archived Sites. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Updated quarterly. ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System. The EPA's database of emergency response actions. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Data since January, 2001, has been received from the National Response Center as the EPA no longer maintains this data. Updated quarterly. FINDS: The Facility Index System. numbers associated with a property investigated or has been made aware regulatory programs. Each record have files on the site or facility. Agency. Updated semi-annually. The EPA's Index of identification or facility which the EPA has of in conjunction with various indicates the EPA office that may Source: Environmental Protection NPL: National Priority List. The EPA's list of confirmed or proposed Superfund sites. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. The EPA's database of registered hazardous waste generators and treatment, storage and disposal facilities. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring 6 Enforcement List). Source: Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA TSD: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites which treat, store, dispose, or incinerate hazardous waste. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. ASTM Databases (continued): RCRA COR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Corractive Action Sites. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites with reported corrective action. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. RCRA GEN: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Large and Small Quantity Generators. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites that create more than 100kg of hazardous waste per month or meet other RCRA requirements. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking Systeml and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring 6 Enforcement List). RCRA NlR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System sites No Longer Regulated. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites that create less than 100kg of hazardous waste per month or do not meet other RCRA requirements. All RCRA databases are Updated quarterly Environmental FirstSearch Federal Databases and Sources Non—ASTM Databases: r&aRS: Razardous Materials Incident Response System. This database contains information from the US Department of Transportation regarding materials, packaging, and a description of events for tracked incidents. Updated quarterly. NCDB: National Compliance Database. The National Compliance Data Base System (NCDB) tracks regional compliance and enforcement activity and manages the Pesticides and Toxic Substances Compliance and Enforcement program at a national level. The system tracks all compliance monitoring and enforcement activities from the time an inspector conducts and inspection until the time the inspector closes or the case settles the enforcement action. NCDB is the national repository of the 10 regional and Headquarters FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS). Data collected in the regional FTTS is transferred to NCDB to support the need for monitoring national performance of regional programs. Updated quarterly NPDES: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The EPA's database of all permitted facilities receiving and discharging effluents. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. NRDB: National Radon Database. The NRDB was created by the EPA to distribute information regarding the EPA/State Residential Radon Surveys and the National Residential Radon Survey. The data is presented by zipcode in Environmental FirstSearch Reports. Source: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Updated Periodically Nuclear: The Nuclear Regulatory CommisslonOs (NRC) list of permitted nuclear facilities. i Updated Periodically PADS: PCB Activity Database System The EPA's database PCB handlers {generators, transporters, storers and/or disposers) that are required to notify the EPA, the rules being similar to RCRA. This database indicates the type of handler and registration number. Also included is the PCB Transformer Registration Database. Updated semi-annually. Receptors: 1995 TIGER census listing of schools and hospitals that may house individuals deemed sensitive to environmental discharges due to their fragile immune systems. Updated Periodically Non -.ASTM Databases (continued): RELEASES: Aix and Surface Water Releaaea. A subset of the EPA's ERNS database which have impacted only air or surface water. Updated semi-annually. Soils: This database includes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data for the conterminous United States. It contains information regarding soil characteristics such as water capacity, percent clay, organic material, permeability, thickness of layers, hydrological characteristics, quality of drainage, surface, slope, liquid limit, and the annual frequency of flooding. Source: United States Geographical Survey (USGS). Updated quarterly TRIS: Toxic Release Inventozy System. The EPA's database of all facilities that have had or may be prone to toxic material releases. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. ENVIRONMENTAL FIRST SEARCH CALIFORNIA DATABASES (DB) AND SOURCES SNERPD / CAL SITES: IS TYPE = STATE (STATE SITES)or OTBER(Other Sites) Source: The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916) 323-3400 The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has developed an electronic database system with information about sites that are known to be contaminated with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database (SMBRPD), also known as CCalsites,C is used primarily by DTSC13s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been affected by the release of hazardous substances. The SMBRPD displays information in six categories. The categories are: 1. CalSites Properties (CS) 2. School Property Evaluation Program Properties (SCR) 3. Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties (VCP) 4. Unconfirmed Properties Needing Further Evaluation (RFE) please Note: FirstSnarch Reports list the above sites as DS Type (STATE). 5. Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Local or State Agency IREF) 6. Properties where a No Further Action Determination has been made INFA) Please Note: FiratSearch Reports list the above sites as Ile Type (OTHER). Each Category contains information on properties based upon the type of work taking place at the site. For example, the CalSites database is now one of the six categories within SMPBRD and contains only confirmed sites considered as posing the greatest threat to the public and/or the potential public school sites will be found within the School Property Evaluation Program, and those properties undergoing voluntary investigation and/or cleanup are in the Voluntary Cleanup Program. CORTESE: DH TYPE c STATE (STATE SITES) Source: The CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control Phone:1916) 445-6532 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List has been compiled by Cal/EPA, Hazardous Materials Data Management Program. The CAL EPA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control compiles information from subsets of the following databases to make up the CORTESE list: 1. The Dept. of Toxic Substances Control; contaminated or potentially contaminated hazardous waste sites listed in the CAL Sites database. Formerly known as ASPIS are included (CALSITES formerly known as ASPIS). 2. The California State Water Resources Control Board; listing of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks are included (LTANK) 3. The California Integrated Waste Management Board; Sanitary Landfills which have evidence of groundwater contamination or known migration of hazardous materials (formerly WB -LF, now AS 3150). Note: Track Info Services collects each of the above data sets individually and lists them separately in the following First Search categories in order to provide more current and comprehensive information: CALSITES: SPL, LTANK: LUST, WB -LF: SWL SKIS SOLID WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM: DS TYPE Source: The Integrated Waste Management Board Phone:(916) 255-2331 The California Integrated Waste Management Board maintains a database on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the state of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. For more information on individual sites call the number listed above. Please Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sitas in the First Search reports; therofore, it may not be possible to locate or plot same sites in First Search reports. WMUDS: DB TYPE - SW (SOLID HASTE RELATED SITES) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4365 The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS). It is no longer updated. It tracked management units for several regulatory programs related to waste management and its potential impact on groundwater. Two of these programs (SWAT 6 TPCAI are no longer on-going regulatory programs as described below. Chapter 15 (SC15) is still an on-going regulatory program and information is updated periodically but not to the WMUDS database. The WMUDS System contains information from the following agency databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit (WMU), Waste Discharger System (WDS), SWAT, Chapter 15, TPCA, RCRA, Inspections, violations, and Enforcement's. Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sites in the First Search reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in First Search reports. ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS: DB TYPE = SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES) Source: Orange County Health Dept. Phone:(714) 634-3536 LUSTIS: DB TYPE - LU (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4416 The State Water Resources Control Board maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks. Information for this database is collected from the states regional boards quarterly and integrated with this database. SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEAKING TANKS: DE TYPE - LU (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2242 Maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks within its HE17/5B database. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at phone number listed above. SLIC REGIONS I - 9: DB TYPE = SP (SPILLS -90) Source: The CAL EPA Regional Water Quality Control Boards 1 - 9 The California Regional Water Quality Control Boards maintain report of sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigation, and cleanups. For phone number listings of departments within each region visit their web sites at: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/regions.html SAN DIEGO COUNTY HE17 PERMITS: DB TYPE - PE (PERMITS) Source: The San Diego County Depart, Of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2211 The HE17/58 database tracks establishments issued permits and the status of their permits in relation to compliance with federal, state, and local regulations that the County oversees. It tracks if a site is a hazardous waste generator, TSD, gas station, has underground tanks, violations, or unauthorized releases. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at the phone number listed above. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMITS: DB TYPE = PE (PERMITS) Source: San Bernardino County Fire Dept. Phone:(909) 387-3080 Handlers and Generators Permit Information Maintained by the Hazardous Materials Div. LA COUNTY SITE MITIGATION COMPLAINT CONTROL LAG: DB TYPE � OT (OTHER UNIQUE DATABASES) Source: The Los Angeles County Hazardous Materials Division Phone: (323) 690-7806 The County of Los Angeles Public Health Investigation Compliant Control Log ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL SITE CLEANUPS: DB TYPE - OT (OTHER UNIQUE DATABASES) Source: Orange County Environmental Health Agency Phone:(714) 834-3536 AST ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE - IIS (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4364 The Above Ground Petroleum Storage Act became State Law effective January 1, 1990, in general, the law requires owners or operators of AST's with petroleum products to file a storage statement and pay a fee by July 1, 1990 and every two years thereafter, take specific action to prevent spills, and in certain instances implement a groundwater monitoring program. This law does not apply to that portion of a tank facility associated with the production oil and regulated by the State Division of Oil and Gas of the Dept. of Conservation. SWEEPS / FIDS STATE REGISTERED UNERGOROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE m US Source: CAL EPA Dept of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916)227-4404 Until 1994 the State Water Resources Control Board maintained a database of registered underground storage tanks statewide referred to as the SWEEPS System. The SWEEPS UST information was integrated with the CAL EPA's Facility Index System database (FIDS) which is a master index of information from numerous California agency environmental databases. That was last updated in 1994. Track Info Services included the UST information from the FIDS database in its First Search reports for historical purposes to help its clients identify where tanks may possibly have existed. For more information on specific sites from individual paper files archived at the State Water Resources Control Board call the number listed above. CUPA DATABASES S SOURCES (DB TYPE = IIS (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) DEFINITION OF A COPA: A Certified Unified Program Agency (COPA) is a I ocal agency that has been certified by the CAL EPA to implement six state environmental programs within the local agency's jurisdiction. These can be a county, city, or JPA (Joint Powers Authorityl• This program was established under the amendments to the California Health and Safety Code made by SB 1982 in 1994. A Participating Agency (PA) is a local agency that has been designated by the local CUPA to administer one or more Unified Programs within their jurisdiction on behalf of the CUPA. A Designated Agency (DA) is an agency that has not been certified by the CUPA but is the responsible local agency that would implement the six unified programs until they are certified. Please Note: Track Info Services, LLC collects and maintains information regarding Underground Storage Tanks from majority of the CUPAS and Participating Agencies in the State of California. These agencies typically do not maintain nor release such information on a uniform or consistent schedule; therefor, currency of the data may vary. Please look at the details on a specific site with a UST record in the First Search Report to determine the actual currency date of the record as provided by the relevant agency. Numerous efforts are made on a regular basis to obtain updated records. ALAM4DA COUNTY CUPA'S * County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health + Cities of Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore / Pleasanton, Newark, Oakland, San Leandro, Union ALPINE COUNTY CUPA Health Department (only updated by agency annually) AMOR COUNTY CUPA " County of Amador Environmental Health Department BUTTE COUNTY CUPA County of Butte Environmental Health Division (Only updated by agency biannually) CALAVERAS COUNTY CUPA • County of Calaveras Environmental Health Department COLUSA COUNTY CUPA . Environmental Health Dept. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CORA * Hazardous Materials Program DEL NORTE COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Health and Social Services EL DORADO COUNTY CUPA'S County of E1 Dorado Environmental Health - Solid Waste Div (Only updated by agency annually) County of El Dorado EMD Tahoe Division (Only updated by agency annually) FRESNO COUNTY CUPA * Haz. Mat and Solid Waste Programs GLENN COUNTY COPA Air Pollution Control District HUMBOLDT COUNTY CUPA (US) • Environmental Health Division IMPERIAL COMM CUPA (US) Department of Planning and Building INYO COUNTY CUPA (US) • Environmental Health Department KERN COUNTY COPA (US) • County of Kern Environmental Health Department • City of Bakersfield Fire Department KINGS COUNTY CUPA (US) • Environmental Health Services LAKE COUNTY COPA (US) • Division of Environmental Health LASSEN COUNTY CUPA (IIS) * Department of Agriculture LOS ANGELES COUNTY CUPA'S (US) • County of Los Angeles Fire Department • County of Los Angeles Environmental Programs Division • Cities of Burbank, E1 Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach/Signal Hill, Los Angeles,Pasadena, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Torrance, Vernon MADERA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department MARIN COUNTY CUPA (US) • County of Marin Office of Waste Management • City of San Rafael Fire Department MARIPOSA COUNTY CUPA (US) Health Department MENDOCINO COUNTY CUPA (US) Environmental Health Department MERCED COUNTY CUPA (US) * Division of Environmental Health MODOC COUNTY CUPA (IIS) Department of Agriculture MONO COUNTY CUPA (IIS) • Health Department MONTERM COUNTY CUPA (US) Environmental Health Division NAPA COUNTY CUPA (US) - Hazardous Materials Section NEVADA COUNTY CUPA (UST) • Environmental Health Department ORANGE COUNTY CUPA'S (US) • County of Orange Environmental Health Department • Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana • County of Orange Environmental Health Department PLACER COUNTY CUPA (US) • County of Placer Division of Environmental Health Field Office • Tahoe City • City of Roseville Roseville Fire Department PLUMAS COUNTY CUPA (UST) Environmental Health Department RIVERSIDE COUNTY CUPA (US) • Environmental Health Department SACRAMENTO COUNTY (US) ' County Environmental Mgmt Dept, Haz. Mat. Div. SAN BENITO COUNTY CUPA (US) - City of Hollister Environmental Service Department SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUPA'S (US) * County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Haz. Mat. Div. ' City of Hesperia Hesperia Fire Prevention Department City of Victorville Victorville Fire Department SAN DIEGO COUNTY COPA (US) * The San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health HE 11/56 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Public Health SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Division 4 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CUPA'S (US) * County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division • City of San Luis Obispo City Fire Department SAN MATEO COUNTY CUPA (US) Environmental Health Department SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CUPA (US) Cc Fire Dept Protective Services Div SANTA CLARA COUNTY CUPA'S (US) • County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division • Santa Clara Cc Central Fire Prot. Dist. (Covers Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, s Morgan Hill) Cities of Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose Fire, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CUPA (US) . Environmental Health Department SHASTA COUNTY COPA (US) - Environmental Health Department SIERRA COUNTY CUPA (US) + Health Department SISKIYOU COUNTY CUPA (US) Environmental Health Department SONOMA COUNTY CUPA'S (US) County of Sonoma Department Of Environmental Health Cities of Healdsburg / Sebastapol, Petaluma, Santa Rosa STANINSLAUS COUNTY CUPA (US) • Dept. of Env. Rsres, Haz. Mat. Div. SUTTER COUNTY CUPA (US) . Department of Agriculture TEHAMA COUNTY CUPA (US) . Department of Environmental Health TRINITY COUNTY CUPA (US) " Department of Health TULARE COUNTY CUPA (US) - Environmental Health Department TUOLUMNE COUNTY CUPA (US) • Environmental Health VENTURA COUNTY CUPA'S (BWT UST'S F CERTIFIED UST'S) County of Ventura Environmental Health Division Cities of Oxnard, Ventura YOLO COUNTY CUPA (US) Environmental Health Department YUBA COUNTY CUPA (US) Yuba County of Emergency services APPENDIX E RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CLOSURE LETTER ydrotech "land Ernpire ofllce: 1906 orange Trea Lane. Me 240 idlends, GA 92374 4/792.4222 W: 714!798.1644 i )rparele ooze. �nge Caunty: 5 Mason :rvine, OA 92718 4/9518686 x.714/951.6919 San alaip %ounly olfieat I OTrade Place. ulle 100 San piego, CA 92126 619!536.1102 x.619/536.1306 June 20, 1990 Mr. John Tomlinson 770 S. Brea Boulevard, Suite 101 Bren, California 92621 Job No. 27-8247-00 1-01-02 SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLOSURE- 15319 Laguna Avenue and 32789 Riverside Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California Mr, Tomlinson: ICG Hydrotech incorporated has received approval, from the Riverside County Department of Health, of the underground storage tank closures (by removal) conducted at 15319 Laguna Avenue and 32789 Riverside Avenue in Lake Elsinore, California. This letter finalizes our underground storage tank closures conducted on the subject property in accordance with our Proposal No. IE/HTC-0-1263A, dated March 7, 1990. Our summary report of project findings was presented to you on April 20, 1990 (Project No. 27-8247-001-01-02, Log No. 0-4 fu), The county health department has reviewed our summary report of findings and has determined that ,...no significant contamination exists and that no further site mitigation will be required at either site." A copy of the letter of approval from the health department is enclosed for your records. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to you and look forward to providing you with environmental services on future projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at (714) 792-4222. Sincerely, ICG HYDROTECH INCORPORATED Ken Vernon Project Geologist, Inland Empire Office Ton�naa �fJ`� Associate Geologist, Inland Empire Office Registered Geologist No. 4178 K V:TM Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within 1 Mile(s) of Target Property TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES. UNrrS•TOMLINSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name Dist/Dir Grandview Ave 0.19 SE Serena Way 0.36 SE Grant Dr 0.59 NE Serenity Ln 0.18 NW Greenwood Or 0.40 NW Shadow Mountain Ln 0.08 SE Half Moon Dr 0.23 SE Sherwood St 0.24 NW Hanley St 0.43 NW Shoreline Dr 0.72 SE Heather Ln 0.83 NE Spinnaker Dr 0.84 SE Hereford Way 0.26 NW Sugarpine St 0.94 NW Highland Rd 0.42 NE Sunrise Way 0.93 SE Hill St 0.12 SE Sunset Dr 0.88 SE Ironwood St 0.99 NW Taylor CI 0.57 NE Jamieson St 0.01 SE Teakwood St 0.88 NW Jofferson St 0.56 NW Tempe St 0.00 - Keel Dr 0.19 NW Terra Cotta St 0.88 NW Kenwood Ct 0.13 NW Tiller Ln 0.20 NW Kevin PI 0.47 SE Timey St 0.75 NW Kingsway Dr 0.00- Toft Or 0.82 NW Kncllwood St 0.93 NW Trabuco Dr 0.43 SE Lagunt Ave 0.00- Ulla Ln 0.02 NW Lake Crest Dr 0.57 NE Via Cordova 0.83 NE Lake Meadows Ct 0.74 NE Via Valdez St 0.91 NE Lake Ridge Rd 0.23 SE Via Valle 0.96 NE Lake Terrace Dr 0.00- Via Verde 0.84 NE Lake Vista Dr 0.34 NE Victoria Brooke Ln 0.35 NW Lakeview Ave 0,00- Walborn Rise 0.30 SE Lancashire Dr 0.00- Washington St 0.08 SE Larson Rd 0.62 NW Wavecrest Dr 0.19 NW Laurel Ln 0.90 NE Welford PI 0.33 SE Le Hme Ave 0.34 NE West Way 0.87 SE Le Harve St 0.27 NE Westlong St 0.19 NW Leeward Way 0.79 SE WestlynnOr 0.00 - Lighthouse Dr 0.72 SE Wilson St 0.07 SE Lime St 0.17 SE Windover Ct 0.20 NW Lincoln St 0.79 NE Windward Way 0.84 SE Linnet Or 0.84 NE Little John Way 0.34 NW Environmental Firsdearch Street Name Report for Streets within 1 Mile(s) of Target Property TARGET SITE: PROP. 336 RES, UNITS-TOMLBNSON PROPERTY JOB: LKELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name Dist/Dir Adams St 0.50 NE Lori Way 0.73 NE 0.28 NW Alvarado St 0.46 NW Machado St 0.77 NW Amber Ln 0.62 NE Macias St 0.25 SE Amberwood Ct 0.67 NE Macy Ave 0.23 SE Anchor Way 0.74 SE 0.98 SE Macy SI Madison St 0.57 NE Annette Dr Audelo St 0.41 NW Magdalena Ct 0.39 NW Avondale Way 0.80 SE Mahogany Way 0.87 NW 0.38 NW Barbar¢ Way0.82 NE Mandavilie Way 0.69 NE Barnstable St 0.36 NW 0.74 SE Marcia Ct Marcoleacc St 0.37 NW Bonnie Lea Dr 0.50 NE Mari Dr 0.66 NE Buchanan St California St 0.10 NW Marian Ave 0.99 SE Canary Ct 0.85 NE Marie Dr 0.93 SE 0.41 SE Cednr Dr 0.79 SE 0.33 NE Mark Ave Maxon Ave 0.39 SE Cheorbourg Chinche St 0.80 NW McKinnly St 0.46 NE Christina Ct 0.81 NE Michelle Dr 0.85 NW 0.91 NW Cleveland Ct 0.48 NE 0.84 NW Mimosa Dr Monroe St 0.45 NE Cobra St Colonial Cir 0.89 NE Monte Vista St 0.48 SW Compass Ct 0.70 SE Mom Way 0.61 SE 0.00 - Concord Ct 0.95 NE Mountain View Ave 025 NW Coplasa St 0.74 NW Nottingham Way 0.82 SE Coral Ct 0.95 NW Oleander Dr 0.13 SE Crane Ter 0.94 SE 0.53 NW Olive Ave Orange St 0.08 SE Crestview Dr Danielle Way 0.79 NE Oregon St 0.17 NW Darnell Dr 0.00- Oriole Ct 0.86 NE 0.44 SW Debtm Dr 0.79 NE Ortega Hwy 0.00 - Dela Lama St 0.99 NW Paradise Cv 0.51 NW Diane Way 0.83 NE 0.66 NE Payne St Popper Dr 0.76 SE Dolly Way Dreycott Way 0.00- Perry Rd 0.77 NW Eisenhower Dr 0.44 NE Pinehurst Dr 0.86 NE 0.65 NW EI Contento Dr 0.00- Plumas St 0.84 NW Ethlene Dr 0.96 SE Princo St 0.87 NE Eureka St 0.39 NW Quail Dr 0.61 SE Fairview St 0.07 SE Quail Knolls Way 0.98 NE Fiamuy St 0.70 NE Raven Dr 0.92 SE Forest Route 6506 0.76 NW Regatta Dr 0.00- r St Fk 0.46 NW Riverside Dr 0.79 NE k St Friarar Tuck 0.29 NW Robin Dr 0.50 NE Garfield St 0.54 NE Roosevelt St 0.05 SE Gisbome St 0.3:. NW 0.62 SE Rose St Saint Pierre Ln 0.91 NE Golden Ct Golondrina St 0.34 NW Sands Ave 023 NW Grand Ave 0.00- Sambia St 0.66 NW APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo I: OverN iew of Parcel 1. Photo taken from the southeast area of Parcel 1 looking northeast. Riverside Drive is visible to the right of the photo as well as Butterfield Village mobile homes: Photo 2, Overview of Parcel 1. Photo taken from the central area of Parcel I looking southwest. Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake Elsinore, California Project No, 04E 106-13 Photo 3: Overview of Parcel 1. Photo taken from west area of Parcel I looking northwest. The existing sidewalk is visiblc in the foreground. The Grand Oaks Apartments are also visible in the background. Photo 4: Overview of Parcel I. Picture taken from south corner of Parcel I looking east. The water well is visible near the tree. Southern California Geotechn►ca► 336 Unit Residential Development — Lake L-ismore, CaliRvnin Project No. 0413106-13 Photo 5- Overview of Parcel 1. Picture taken from the northeast are of Parcel I looking northeast. Elsinore High School 44 is visible across the. Riverside County Flood Control Channel. Photo 6Overview of Parcel 2. Photo Taken from the central area of Parcel 2lockine west. The Elsinore Mountains are visible in the background. Southern California Geotechnical 336 Unit Residential Development •- Lake Elsinore, California — m Project No. 0AE106-13 Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility LID Technical Infeasibility Analysis 33 LID BMP is considered to be feasible Appendix 6: BMP Design Details 8MP Sizing, Design Details and other Supporting Documentation 34 Santa Ana Watershed - BMP Design Volume. VBMPRequired lintrics Legend (Rev 10-2011) Calculated Cells (Note tlm a wlshe'i'hall Only be rued ur colaun, I .... awh BAH) designs fion, Me L I I I D Company Name VA CONSULTING INC Dine 9/23/2012 Designed by J. I IERNANDEZ Case No Company ProjectNmnber/Name 1-122.01.0103 Lak- View Village - - - — -_----------_------ ---- . . ...... 13MIl Identification BMP NAME /Ill WalcrQualilyBasin - --- ------------------ - -------------- -- Must match Nome/ID used on BMP Design Calculation Sheet Design Rainfall Depth Percentile, 24-lican Rainfall Dcpth, the Isohyetal Map in I landbook Appendix E, Drainage M Aica Tabulation Dss 0.93 Insert additional rows if needed to accommodate all OMAs draining to the BMP inches 2 AREA A 665489,65 Roofs 1 AM AREA C 76230 Roofs M gga, �zi-igiigi im" I gvF'v 0212 — ---------- d T7 t5 RAM mam W, 990am 'ii6 - Total 54886 W C In S v o -- o �In -- w � W �l ^ p� � 000000-- a U W rl o N o 7 7 7 N N rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1O W e O rn (T N O O O 7 7 7 N N n V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Z N N N N N OI N BMPSubarea Rc uuedLnuies Extended Detention Basin Design Procedw a No I Legcnd:altalatd Company Name: VA CONSULTING, INC. Date: tt4444#4 Designed by J. HERNANDEZ County/City Case No.: ueslgn V Tributary Area (BMP Subarea) Enter V1,I,1I,,determined from Section 2.1 ofthis Handbook nt Overall Geometry Length at Basin Bottom Surface Width at Basin Bottom Surface AI = 18.29 acres Viwp 51,411 ft' Length = 100 It Width = 50 Meets 1.5: 1 requirement? Side Slopes pet"Basin Guidelines", Sect. 1.2 z= 4 Proposed Basin Depth (with no freeboard) DB = 6.00 Depth of freeboard (if used) Minimum Required Allowance for 7'olal Depth (including proposed basin depth, freeboard, minimum depth of bottom stage (DBS 0.33') and minimum filter depth (D,.,)-2.33')) Depth fi-om design water surface elevation to lowest orifice BOTTOM STAGE TOP OF SIDE SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 4H:1V BASIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE PER DISTRICT BASIN GUIDELINES OR OTHER GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE ENGINEERING AUTHORITY (EA) OR PLANNING AUTHORITYPA ft ft DF13 = 0.00 11 Dler 8.7 1t Do �t fl ft PERFORATED PIPE SUBDRAIN ACCESS TO OUTLET /-OUTLET WITH TRASH / RACK PER WO501 Basin Design Basin Design Proposed Total Basin Depth (proposed depth plus freeboard) Dlo, 6.00 ft Basin Invert Longitudinal Slope Slope = 1.00 % Basin Invert Transverse Slope (1% min) Slope = I % Basin VOILllne Vj,,,,,, = 54886 ft' FORESAY VOLUME= 3%-5% OF Vq SURFAC SIZE NOTCH -TYPE WEIR INFLOW OUTLET TO DRAIN FOREBAY INVERT OF VOLUME IN S MINUTES gBRN X 24'0 GRAVEL FILLED LOW FLOW MIN BOTTOM STAGE Dia -TOP OF ' TRENCH VOL=0.5% V pip DrOT BASIN BERM/WALL )NFL �y t _.. _ WATER SURFACE pO=LU DbF-Do _._ ._.._ —.. �..—..—.._.._. o.xoMlN ..—. TmIN —.._. —.. .. _ _7'/ MIN � BASIN BOTTOM STAGE - �' LOWEST ORIFICE — PAVED BOTTOM- 18'WX24'D GRAVEL FILLED COLLECTOR TRENCH DFD 2 MN OUTLET WORKS (SEE WO501 DETAILS) Forebay Design Forebay VOIUme (3 - 5%V,,,) VrR = 1542.33 ft Forebay Depth (height of berm) Dj,ny = 2 ft Minimum Forebay Surface AreaAli; UZQ1 J� x:;..?:;fi Rectangular weir (note])) W _ 12.00 in Dry Weather and Low -Flow Management Low -Flow Trench (sec graphic below) Depth (24 inches minimum, gravel filled) Depth = 24 inches Width (48 inches minimum) Width= 48 inches Trench Invert Longitudinal Slope Slope — 0.5 % Collector Trenches (see graphic below) Depth (24 inches minimum) Depth= 24 inches Width (18 inches minimum) Width= 18 inches Trench Invert Longitudinal Slope Slope = 0.05 % Spacing (25 feet on center maximum) S_ 25 feet Transverse Slope (1% min) '-----'—� 24" (min) (min) L....i"�4�� AASHTO No. 2 E-48" (min) Coarse aggregate E � 18" (min) Low -Flow Trench Collector Trench Bottom Stage (Sand Filter) Design Depth of the Bottom Stage (4" minimum ponding) Dl3s = 6 in Surface Area of Bottom Stage Dry Weather Ponded VOlume (above sand layer) Is Vas mo less than 0.5% VnMl,? OK Depth of ASTM -C33 sand (18 inch minimum) Ds - 18 inches Diameter of Subdrains Subdrain Spacing (1) _ 6 in s = 10 ft. on center Alas = 750 ft' Viasl2 ft' �.._...,_ s. ,.. Das 6" dia. --— A. pert. pipe 3' Ds =18" min. ASTM C33 sand 6"! 10" min. gravel 1"� L_'an 'l layer Outlet Design assume an orifice area. Based on the nformation provided above, the spreadsheet provides discharge vs. stage data Enter the iolume vs. stage data for each interval. This nformation is used to route the volume through he basin. The size of the orifice is acceptable vhen the data shows that less than 50% of JBMP has drained in 24 hours, and that 100% lrawdown occurs within 72 hours. Flow Rate, Q (cfs) Q=CA[2g(H-He)j" Discharge Coefficient, Default ( Other, C = Orifice Area (ft°) SIDE SL PGS NOS ILE ER IFAN 4af�R - DISTRICT BASIN DESIGN OUIDELINPS OR OTHER GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE vertl11- nnp OanirN CO -PERMITTEE _ Trash Rack BaS EDA 'Jn� �nP Waler Sumaoo \step D Dt1W1 D y W alnvr Water - \ S nrri SPo11onY51age_ Orifice Diameter, d; number of orifices per row, n; and number of orifice rows, N (from the bottom up). d = 2.5 inches n 1 per row N = 3 rows Acff D (i33 :at' per row or Acff in, per row From outflow hydrograph, the time where 50% of Vun41, has drained from the basin (24 hour minimum): Time (50%) { ihrs OK From outflow hydrograph, the time where 100% VIUMI, has drained from the basin(within 72 hours): Time (100 %) 47.24' Uu's Sand Enter Layer HeadwarerF_,ley. /stage(n) Discharge (cfs) V011 -me (acre -ft) At (hl s.) 0.334n 1 4r 0.67 1.00 ., ry; 0.130 1.33 1.67 1 `tKf 2.00 €>E) lta 0.290 `33 2.33 2.67 NO INY e . WAffm 3.00s ` 0.480 3.33 NEW MOM 3.67 4.00 7 0.700 z. 4.67;��(vl�;r 5,00 t7:4t 4..„F. M 0.960 3fl 12. 1 5.33 SRs:'x21� a 5.67 6.00 T.1 ,' 1.260 6.33 6.67 7.00 7.33 7.67 8.00 8.33 8.67 9.00 9.33 9.67'" 10.00 , ' = _. Appendix 7: Hydromodification Supporting Detail Reloting to Hydrologic Conditions of Concern 35 Lake Elsinore is an adequate sump, therefore, there are no Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Appendix 8: Source Control Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist 36 � v v J Q C 0 0 Z IE j V 7 a a '� �� v uU vd� � � � w' ❑ C b u a t °~ C Rnv a o.G 6 a� vcu ma 0 O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ F v a R� W 0 b cEo.Y O w j O u d' Eth o W U (a ami u o ❑pa. N O W W S P v f ,✓ C Q� O N y v W C J C A 0 S N y C 0 0 3 O 19 = U o IG O y� z W N C O ° ,C F v o G a C G .0 R R E V a° d IL R, ti R m J 4 bq R y 0 C 3 W N C O a N N N � Cd 7 7 v NC W 6 w 3 N W O K LU = a X O ❑ ❑ LL 0 w V N O N N W U It n O N L •O > n 0 W J 7 3 ; ?�. is N C N C .ca. L 10 G r U v o v is o Q A CO. v Cro p O> V Z b C d v. , N c C J H 9 O V Q O v o C N o c G v y °o N o P, J a � O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ r z aLU ��" m 'aia 7 �' > v a`i'+ a� v�� C" w •� m qrq q m o y C y a m N J L G p, u v � v" Q� .G W C w ❑C�qpC G ., m v •❑ c u N 2 v w C eA C 'is. �" o v �, a- �, a, qu +' M .o .e p •`" " x « CAG " .N a; v :9 a :: a•" °' a d •`° u �a u p F- o m b �", w 'k b y d " a v "° •a v y a o p V �a", .G r •ao F o m° w 2 ro `C ri. v q v c 'd •p v .= a u 2 m .0 :? •^ u U w ai .G a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O y o a r O o q QW g 7 q q m ro ca aA 'v' > 0 3 Gbb aA «wa m G Z ,�, o ro a 'G «'° Z U q 4 � • O 3 O 'O '�' ' '� CA OA u 7 m o v a o N m A a ❑ ❑ ❑ W v Cw v m via J Y! �f "u U v v N N 6 •. 4, .^v. W V V o W N O 6 v z, o ro 0 7 R w O q N a' G Op G C 0 a O LU a 0 � N W O 0 W = a xF. f ❑ ❑ Z a O -- a do a a C w ��•v C ub « oo^NW wro3 V w> u an m ro o 'ac nn ti p a w " ❑ w v p a o v y J 7 R C C C v O a M A V .� 0. .0.m G x C G u Ci a 7 z y ti, v C ro O p H 0. w k A 6 b o y `� T d J O• O O ❑ ❑ ❑ C r z a Oul m O vO �° � y x `� Z+ 'o W M` .O b C p w O N tn C y �• W O v G k 'C C o^ A-� w L .� q .0 Q V N Z IL ❑ ❑ O O O L b O w 3 s y R O •p 7 u « p o .p O o 'v T1 G v p Cw v jv ,p v C y '� S yvv, v G v C o u w ro « A u N°❑ A VJ 4 i L uv C 00.00 vG'�G.0 oCvro p0.vw pOw .0. yvROq� ! o u '� W v en « o o G v ro o v N w p? .� .0 0.v' v W O G C u 'C o 'w 'w v o t a 6 ,,,° v N v C b N m m O w .w w v row v v ,'�, � N b > b o o C w C v y w C r v « m rj a a w b m p C W N r V V > O O m v w R y O w >> N ma o F°ubE w° N K C o W b k w u t9 LU 6 " 3 N W O W = 6 F ❑ ❑ ❑ z LL O § 0 LU � , | k \ 0 m LU « ■ / � {s 2 ��a&} _-0Zp ¥ 2« � •\§ eee � \ 02 B t }}j2;2c;zs § o g j IL § u0 .0 § \. k mc § ! ] o 3 CL or 0 \� ; 0 , "uIL \ . 1 [ ` ; I q ui /§ `� §UJ - kIX r0 _ /� �� q �z W V O N N W V K O N a M� 0 M E O c A > W 9 M J 7 O ro ro Q °c V Z ° J a y L v v CAN C 01 N 'ro 6� ro A Q O N m a, ~ v•pbUA NCO 9L ._ 't 'E m y O O ❑ F Z 6 V 7. N Z v H N O y N 7 M wp W Z M 9 y .Y y a F N ' C C C OA O O 0 p O F' b A G R , j O m r0 0. v (=� N N 4, w> :r' •F N .G T1 � C 16 b •C C � E °''C u J W F ? v v V e u is v v p A d v is Q L J a 7 C IL 3 C?> y C N I O 'Ci C W N 0 O b B G c� w q v N .0 N L R 'p C Z 6 9 E v^ M m u OI CL ❑ O ❑ W m N w N U j O Y w C W Nkn E o H d W F O; W N a Q 0 0 a+ p c !% c °1 E a td u E N C a — v m W 6 r 2 N W o K W = 6 Fr ❑ Z LL O r N J Y u W S u L m G O " v E W c O v « O ro« <i Z 0 C > bA G J O. 9 .A w J� O IL 6 c w u o A �A o E o ,. o ui o D. m 0 O O r z a bti b ro v LU W L R y Z m N« U W M O U v m v E i c m C r RC O W D u d a m pp O r m •C w� c U J V r u O k U Z L c IL O O S y bA •� C C C a 6 C 'G u ,mqN y v o A u .j m C a S 'atii m° m G v m a O y� 3 a o � 0.m v roA g m u y o m u. v o a •, r v� a o ,� mA N i O m Q Q q A bA R w N C 'C ro u w v m yZj N C O 0 [ •,�% ro •u U E .o '�.E^ .? ., s �. y C bA °� v m v R.� U �qq 'u u ,.,CU, s° = 6 v O A m b u 'D M E L Mx O «•fl m` r G .9 u t"c .« R; 0 ro C C u E U m 6 a W m C J C lu v C ~ N N U R + U m q W uNLUIL O c a Y u O O N O: c t W W a ;; NW O W = 6 H r p LL Q F y J Y V W m u J O K F Z O V W Q lz 7 0 y y W V K 0 0 5 W 3 Ix 0 F U) CY C C V o° U Op DS R o N N aia 'oo b N N O C V - v u •. p w 0 ° W O o C ro b y C m .? q .7 N tl C 9 m 5` Q OA Q CR a«,b'A A"��Gtl.��v✓C`, G.0p^f �j'rti O""`q�u �aOi Ja NZ y 'O m P..� p0. v 9 r w o v ❑ .tl b C ef, '�' G Q y an a 7 o 0 00 to � •° o E a ° w 3 °� "' � b � 0 .S .� � r� � ro g .a .tl Xi C C w 'G• C p C Q. g m q a n v q 0 CavM.,5;U u N v N Z 'O O U u c Q H E Nr W m ✓. (< H V i C N 0. N .� N N H LL u u N CL U Ci '/: C4 G A J a O O O O N r 6 w v w q 0 O 0d LU b c v E b w s@ O O V% O GLU Om d U bA 0)N2 �.�+70.0 m'X �'Cb CN W m 0 '[ 'r ° u u o v C: .0 v o "«tk i e v > OA O W C w O N N O � avi D u O« v tl w 2 E D a" O O O O IL O C O u •« � ., C tl L'i' N '0 O L .�., v�n � N nt .u, .O, 3 p p m v pp O N b O w ❑ u N q A s E m N U K 0 u '« C •gyp q �° N d v is ? O v 0 a o ro b .� P. O« 3 C •en'd v v bpb d N v C ro WN C G v 0. v 'roU C k 'O to •.tl, R 'CJ [ R O W; uN �i 0 ON Co �' w p CC c N CL O O O LU u m g J O 0. .a c �- U ta W u v tl V CUJ y O 0 to w C W O. y W W = O O a 2 F z O LL 0 r 2 Q r 7 J J O IL c a � a a v a v v � L N 3 w W J L > O +' 9 0 Q G� y •� G C F O qv 7 O N a m O J C y, 7 N as 9L v N C Q d y W C x p R N 0 IL r a Hcy J O. C O ❑ ❑ r OLU c V O ; U � L > O W � R N� 2 M S 4 L r L R G (j N c R r V e 2 R E o J d n a O =M N y w c n b c w .. ° r 0. G � N b o � A• E v C �. N ZN W a F V • G N L v Q' v 0 C O m v 'w 0 CL Q•.0 v^ 6 ❑ ❑ W m J A N C 3 r lu f 7 3 O Q C' JU c' fn CL _ v w v N rg C W CL O N W O C = a F ❑ r Z LL O c a 3 E v c W J 9 > V bia A O dA 7 Iw6 7 J v 0 IL a C Q o R o y 6 4o vo a °r d O O O O S r z IL O V O W � C y O N w W( N 10 a z Wm 6 67 C r C a O V d � C � v cr z a � o J 6 O S M w m � o an rxvxa ven �,Q o u ° b "« Cbp c b c v 2[ 0.awb v v b ab o, i' O 36 w . N R G O, o p ", E LU c6 O 4 y "O' k N 0 • F4 m d� � C N v n u N p A v n„ 'd C ;� C C� C w o C v a .'7 v ro v m o o •Oia u m 5 uG v w ..'✓. o v d CL O O O W m w 0 IU' WC r V O 7 U O NIL 6 w N m = o W 6 w 3 CO W O LL W = a X r O LL o J O C r z O U W V 19 D O N N W V O: O N a v " 3 v n �j C 9c a v C A v7 z o 00 y O ❑ r C V O k v w "" v LLI a' C; m t"'tkc yVl r .r A bp' 'O y R. C .ti b v ax] u C v ro w A o� �v❑� pa�°nonax av a" v� �� W M O Z C N C in` v 'R q O C� « v 7 a u m pp •° "� ,� Dry ° e m '� .. o o a o o a v :o e"n w� .a' u u 0 N p V o C. o Cqq" q o Cr o w O k V R L O O O O ❑ ❑ ❑ O S N L c O O s � z Z v R W N L O v a d Q C m E v a �v C m u F AO e Lu v N N VV N y V C R bA O u w r PS Q W. 5 0 w 0. N W O S WL a Z LL O o: W r Q 3 rc O r N Q� i ro U y O u N N W 9 R ui ro U v V Vz ro N j � V a d N �•TJ N w 0 N N an r ro C 3 �pp v b ro c r a u a 0 C w IL d J O. O O O C IMM z ILO V O W 19 L d n > O w .. U) J W N ( R z W M ` 9 c IMM c A G V d G R v c r z_ O E D J O D a O x N IL c O 3 O s H o, } 0 3 L A z W N C O F u a C (i N c m E L d CL W m x J L J W N« d c � N u N V7 LU 3 V ci y O N R ro W > > a C w a F b N KC a m c C WL Y 3 W W O W x a x r O r z LL O Appendix 9: O&M Operation and Maintenance Plan and Documentation of Finance, Maintenance and Recording Mechanisms 37 Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility Frequency Matrix' ' Inspection/maintenance records must be kept for five years for inspection by the City inspector BMP Responsible Party Maintenance Activity Inspection/Maintenance Frequency Source Control BMPs (Both structural and non-structural) Tenant Education Property Owners Property Owners— Upon initial leasing or sale Association Association shall provide of property and annually. all tenants with environmental awareness education materials (made available by municipalities) Activity Restrictions Property Owners Prohibit the blowing, As needed Association sweeping or hosing of debris into storm drain inlets and other conveyances Common Area Litter Property Owners Empty trash receptacles, 5 times/year or as needed Control Association patrol common areas and perimeter fences to collect litter Employee Training Property Owners Train in g courses for Annually Association employee on storm water pollution Common Area Catch Basin City of Lake Elsinore Inspect and clean out catch Annually/Ongoing Inspection basins Street Sweeping City of Lake Elsinore Sweep streets and Monthly or as needed maintain free from debris -- — Catch Basin Stenciling & — City of Lake Elsinore ---------- Inspection of stencil Bi -annual (twice a year) Signage legibility. Re -stencil as necessary, but no less than once every years. Design and construct trash City of Lake Elsinore -5 Inspect trash receptacles Monthly and waste storage areas to for leak and damage reduce pollution introduction Efficient Irrigation & Properly Management Inspection of sprinkler Weekly Landscape Design Company or Property heads and irrigation timing Owners Association cycle, and replacing, repairing or adjusting as necessary. ' Inspection/maintenance records must be kept for five years for inspection by the City inspector BMP Responsible Party Maintenance Activity Inspection/Maintenance Frequency LID BMPs— Extended Detention Basin Property Management Maintain During every scheduled Company or Property vegetation as maintenance check (per Owners Association needed. Use of below), and as needed at fertilizers, other times. pesticides and herbicides should be strongly avoided to ensure they don't contribute to water pollution. If appropriate native plant selections and other IPM methods are used,such products shouldn't be needed. If such projects are used: o Care should be taken to avoid contact with the low -flow or other trenches, and the media filter in the bottom stage. o Products shall be applied in accordance with their labeling, especially in relation to application to water, and in areas subjected to flooding. o Fertilizers BMP Responsible Party Maintenance Activity Inspection/Maintenance Frequency —should not be applied within 15 days before, after, or during the rainy season. • No ponded water should be present for more than 72 hours to avoid nuisance or vector problems. No algae formation should be visible. Correct problems as needed. • Remove debris Annually. If possible, and litter from the schedule these inspections entire basin before the beginning of the • Inspect hydraulic rain season to allow for any and structural repairs to occur before facilities. rains occur. Examine the outlet for clogging, the embankment and spillway integrity, as well as damage to any structural element. • Checkfor erosion, slumping and overgrowth. Repair as needed. • Inspect sand media at the filer drain to verify it is allowing acceptable infiltration. Scarify top 3 inches by raking the filter drain's sand surface annually. BMP Responsible Party Maintenance Activity Inspection/Maintenance Frequency • Check the media filter underdrens (via the cleanout) for damage or clogging. Repair as needed. • Remove accumulated sediment and debris from the forebay, and ensure that the notch weir is clear and will allow proper drainage. • Check gravel filled low flow and collector trenches for sediment buildup and repair as needed. • Remove the top Every 5 years or sooner 3 inches of sand (depending on whether from the filter observed drain times to drain and backfill empty the basin are less with 3 inches of than 72 hours). new sand to return the sand layer to its original depth. When scarification or removal of the top 3 inches of sand is no longer effective, remove and replace sand filter layer. • Remove Whenever substantial accumulated sediment accumulation has sediment from occurred, the bottom of the basin. Removal should extend to original basin depth. Appendix 10: Educational Materials BMP Fact Sheets, Maintenance Guidelines and Other End-User BMP Information M 3.6 Extended Detention Basin Type of BMP ' LID. -.Biotreatment Treatment Mechanisms Sedimentation, Infiltration, Biofiltration,Evapotranspiration, and Evaporation :Minimum Tributary Drainage Area '5 acres Other Names Enhanced Water Quality Basin Overview The Extended Detention Basin (EDB) is designed to detain the design volume of stormwater, VB P, and maximize opportunities for volume losses through infiltration, evaporation, evapotranspiration and surface wetting. Additional pollutant removal is provided through sedimentation, in which pollutants can attach to sediment accumulated in the basin through the process of settling. Stormwater enters the EDB through a forebay where any trash, debris, and sediment accumulate for easy removal. Flows from the forebay enter the basin which is vegetated with native grasses that enhance infiltration and evapotranspiration, and which is interspersed with gravel -filled trenches that help further enhance infiltration. Water that does not get infiltrated or evapotranspired is conveyed to the bottom stage of the basin. At the bottom stage of the basin, low or incidental dry weather flows will be treated through a sand filter and collected in a subdrain structure. Any additional flows will be detained in the basin for an extended period by incorporating an outlet structure that is more restrictive than a traditional detention basin outlet. The restrictive outlet structure extends the drawdown time of the basin which further allows particles and associated pollutants to settle out before exiting the basin, while maximizing opportunities for additional incidental volume losses. Riverside Comvp - Lou' Impact Developmenl 13A411 Design Handbook Page 1 rev. 9/Z011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET TOP OF BOTTOM SIDE SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 4H IV BASINSTpOE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE PER DISTRICT BASIN ONDEUNEOTHER GUIDELINES PERFORATED PIPE ISSUED UI THE ENGINEERING EERING AUTHORITY PERFORIN rOR PLANNING AUTHORITY /� 'Y' 'v V V' ACCESS TO OUTLET BASIN FLOOR WITH 1% MIN. SLOPE TO LOW�F OW TRENCH N' OUTLET WITH TRASH N' W J1 Vi II 1` Sw _. RACK PER WQ501 FORESAY SIZE NOTCH -TYPE WEIR OUTLET TO DRAIN FORERAY VOLUME IN 6 MINUTES — INFQA.l= PAVED BOTTOM — 7' GRAVEL FILLED COLLECTOR TRENCH SECTION COLLECTOR TRENCH PLAN �-4s•MIN NTS 24'MIN SECTION A -A LOW FLOW TREkH INVERT OF r' 48M X 24'D GRAVEL FILLED MIN BOTTOM STAGE LOW FLOW TRENCH VOL=0.6%V pap TER SURFACE DI, Do �s=i%MIN rBASINVOLUME✓ p 16' SAND (MIN) 21 SECTION FILTER DRAIN Figure 1— Extended Detention Basin LOWEST ORIFICE OUTLET WORKS — (SEE W0501 DETAILS) DRAWING NOTES O AASHTO NO. 57 OR BT COARSE AGGREGATE. LAYER 2U FINE AGGREGATE PER ASTM C- 33. OS PASHTO NO. 2 GRAVEL LAYER GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICPS APPENDIX 8-'LNDERDRAINS' FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING UNDERDRAINS 2. SEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICTS APPENDIX C -"BASIN GUIDELINES' FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL BASIN INFORMATION Riverside ( m/wi, - Lme Impact Developnrenl 131Y1Y Design Hondhook rev. 9/2011 Page 2 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET Siting Considerations Soils: EDBs can be used with almost all soils and geology. However, pollutant removal effectiveness is greatly improved when the underlying soil permits at least some infiltration. Tributary Area: EDBs should only be used where the tributary drainage area is at least 5 acres, since meeting the draw -down requirements (discussed below) for smaller areas would result in very small outlet orifice diameters which would be prone to clogging. Proximity to Receiving Waters: All site runoff must be treated to the MEP with appropriate BMPs before being discharged into Receiving Waters; as such the EDB cannot be constructed in-line within Receiving Waters. Setbacks: Due to the infiltration characteristics incorporated into the EDB design, the lowest pervious point (beneath the filter drain) of the extended detention facility should be a minimum of 10' above the seasonal high groundwater table. All other setbacks shall be in accordance with applicable standards of the "Basin Guidelines' (Appendix C) or other guidelines issued by the Engineering Authority (EA). Basin Guidelines: See Section 1 of the "Basin Guidelines" (Appendix C) for additional requirements (i.e., fencing, maintenance access, etc.) that may be required by the Engineering Authority (EA). Landscaping Requirements Basin vegetation provides erosion protection, enhances evapotranspiration and infiltration, and improves pollutant removal. The upper stage basin surface, berms and side slopes shall be planted with native grasses. Proper landscape management is also required to ensure that the vegetation does not contribute to water pollution through the use of pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers. Landscaping shall be in accordance with applicable standards of the "Basin Guidelines" (Appendix C) or other guidelines issued by the EA. Riverside Courcy - Lon, /ntpnct Development BAIP Design GlaaWooh Page 3 rev. 9/2011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET During every scheduled . ,Maintain vegetation as needed. Use of fertilizers, pesticides and i maintenance check (per below), ') `herbicides should be strongly avoided to ensure they don't contribute and os needed at other times to water pollution. if appropriate native plant selections and other i IPM methods are used, such products shouldn't be needed. if such j projects are used: j o Care should be; taken to avoid contact with the low - flow or other trenches, and the media filter in the E bottom stage. o Products shall be applied in accordance with their labeling, especially in relation to application to water, and in areas subjected to flooding. o Fertilizers should not be applied within 15 days before, after, or during the rainy season. is No ponded water should be present for more than 72 hours to avoid i nuisance or vector problems. No algae formation should be visible. Correct problems as needed. Annually. If possible, schedule j• Remove debris and litter from the entire basin these inspections before the Inspect hydraulic and structural facilities. Examine the outlet for beginning of the rain season to clogging, the embankment and spillway integrity, as well as damage allow for any repairs to occur to any structural element. before rains occur. • Check for erosion, slumping and overgrowth. Repair as needed. ;• Inspect sand media at the filter drain to verify it is allowing acceptable infiltration. Scarify top 3 inches by raking the filter drain's sand surface annually. • Check the media filter underdrains (via the cleanout) for damage or clogging. Repair as needed. • Remove accumulated sediment and debris from the forebay, and ensure that the notch weir is clear and will allow proper drainage. is Check gravel filled low flow and collector trenches for sediment buildup and repair as needed. Every 5 ` years or sooner . Remove the top 3 inches of sand from the filter drain and backfill with j (depending on whether observed) 3 inches of new sand to return the sand layer to its original depth. drain times to empty the basin When scarification or removal of the top 3 inches of sand is no longer are less than 72 hours). effective, remove and replace sand filter layer. Whenever substantial sediment Remove accumulated sediment from the bottom of the basin. accumulation has occurred. Removal should extend to original basin depth. j Riverside Comm!], - LouImpact Deaclopmew BMP Design llondbnok rev. 9,2011 Page 4 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET Design Summary Note: The information contained in this BMP Factsheet is intended to be a summary of design considerations and requirements. Additional information which applies to all detention basins may be found in the "Basin Guidelines" (Appendix C). In addition, information herein may be superseded by other guidelines issued by the Engineering Authority. Design Procedure These steps correspond to and provide a description of the information required in the EDB Design Worksheet. 1. Find the Design Volume, VaMP. a) Enter the tributary area, A, to the BMP. The minimum tributary area is 5 acres. b) Enter the Design Volume, Va ,,, determined from Section 2.1 of this Handbook. Riverside Coimry - Low Impocl Development 132141) Design llandh00% Page 5 rev. 912011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET 2. Basin Footprint a) Enter the length and width of the EDB. The length shall be measured between the inlet to the basin and the outlet structure; and the width shall be measured at the widest point of the basin invert. The length to width ratio should be 1.5:1 or longer to prevent short-circuiting and increase the overall effectiveness of the BMP. outlet Bott�ln St3�e ,, Foi eba, �a Upstage islet cone(t Inlet V5, outlet Place me nt Fole outlet Bottom Stage I i(OF Fe Ct 111let'V5. outlet Placement b) Enter the internal basin side slopes. See the 'Basin Guidelines' (Appendix C) for side slope requirements. If variable internal side -slopes are used, enter the steepest slope that will be used. c) Using Figure 1 as a guide, enter the proposed basin depth, Da, and the freeboard depth, Drs. Based on the information provided, the spreadsheet will calculate the minimum total depth required, DR,Q, for this BMP. DREQ is the depth from the bottom of the underdrain layer in the bottom stage (see step 5c), to the top of the freeboard. This calculated minimum required depth can be used to determine if enough elevation difference is available within the design topography to allow for use of this BMP. d) Additionally, the basin depth D6 is equal to DQ, which is the depth from the design pond water surface elevation to the lowest orifice in the outlet structure. DQ is confirmed by the spreadsheet and is used in the Basin Outlet Design described in step 6 below. It should be noted that this lowest orifice is a critical elevation in the design of this BMP. The Volume of the Basin Veas;. described in step 3d) is the volume of water above this lowest orifice. This lowest -orifice also represents the dry weather ponded water surface discussed in step 5c below. Below this elevation there must be a minimum of a 4 -inch drop down to the surface of the Sand Filter in the bottom stage. Riverside ConwY - Low Impacl Developnrem Bd41' Design 1-&17dGook Page 6 rev. 9/2011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP TACT SHEET 3. Basin Design a) The Total Basin Depth, DToT, is calculated automatically, and is the sum of the basin depth DB plus the freeboard depth DFe. b) Enter the longitudinal slope of the basin invert. This slope must be at least 1% and is measured along the low flow trench between the forebay and the bottom stage. Note that the surface of the sand layer in the bottom stage must be level (see Figure 1). c) Enter the transverse slope of the basin invert. This transverse (cross sectional) slope must be at least 1% sloped toward the low flow trench. d) Enter the Volume of the Basin, V,,,,,. This volume must be the actual volume of water held within the basin as substantiated by modeling or appropriate volumetric calculations, and must be equal to or greater than VBN,,. This volume must be held above the lowest orifice in the Basin Outlet Design described in step 6 below. 4. Forebay Design All flows must enter the basin through the forebay. The forebay provides a location for the settlement and collection of larger particles, and any other trash or debris. A relatively smooth and level concrete bottom surface should be provided to facilitate mechanical removal of any accumulated sediment, trash and debris. a) Enter the Forebay Volume VFB. This volume must be from 3 to 5 percent of VBMP- Figure 2: Forebay filled with storm water b) A rock or concrete berm must be constructed to detain water before it drains into the basin. The top of the berm shall be set no higher than the invert of the inlet conveyance. Enter the Forebay Depth, D,,,, c) The spreadsheet will calculate the minimum surface area of the forebay, AFB, based on the provided Forebay Volume and Depth. Ensure that the plans provide for a forbay area at least this large. d) Although the forebay will be well submerged in the design event, a full height rectangular notch -type weir shall be constructed through the berm to prevent permanent ponding in the forebay, and allow water to slowly and fully drain to the main body of the basin. This notch should be offset from the inflow streamline to prevent low -flows from short circuiting. Enter the width, W, of this rectangular notch weir. The width shall not be less than 1.5 inches to prevent clogging. Additionally, Riverside Counlp - Low Impact Development IiddP Design Handbook Page 7 rev. 912011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET immediately outside the notch construct a minimum 1 -foot by 1 -foot gravel pad to prevent vegetative growth within the basin invert from blocking the notch. S. Dry Weather and Low -Flow Management The basin shall have both a low -flow gravel trench and a network of gravel collector trenches across the invert of the basin, as well as a bottom stage sand filter to treat low flows and dry weather flows (see Figure 1). a) Low Flow Trench: The low -flow gravel trench conveys flow from the forebay to the bottom stage, while allowing for maximum incidental infiltration and volume loss. The trench shall be a minimum of 48 inches wide by 24 inches deep. This trench shall be unlined and backfilled with AASHTO No. 2 gravel (or similar) to the finished surface of the basin invert, and shall not use underdrains. The bottom excavated surface of the low -flow trench shall be 1 percent or flatter to promote infiltration. Figure 3: Gravel filled low -flow trench b) Collector Trenches: Gravel collector trenches beneath the top stage shall be arranged as illustrated in Figure 1 of Appendix C with minimal slope (1% maximum) along their bottom excavated surface to promote infiltration, and must extend from the low -flow trench to the toe of the basin side slopes. They shall be a minimum of 18 -inches wide by 24 -inches deep, unlined and backfilled with AASHTO No. 2 gravel (or similar) to the finished basin invert surface. The gravel collector trenches shall not use underdrains and shall be constructed with a maximum spacing of 25 feet, center to center. See Figure 1 of Appendix C. c) Bottom Stage: A depressed sand filter drain area, referred to as the bottom stage, must be constructed adjacent to the outlet structure to treat any dry weather flows. To ensure that dry weather flows are treated through the sand filter and not discharged through the orifice plate, the top surface of the sand filter must be depressed at least 4 inches below the lowest orifice in the outlet structure. This depressed area will create a micro pool of water that is then filtered down through the sand filter and out through underdrains. Based on the minimum dimensions described below, the minimum depth of excavation below the lowest orifice in the outlet structure is 2.33 feet. i. Enter the Depth of the bottom stage, Dr, As mentioned above, this depth must be at least 4 inches, and extend down below the lowest orifice in the outlet structure. ii. Enter the area of the bottom stage, ABS. Rivenvlde County—Low Inipacl Denelopmeet BAIP Design HandboOA Page 8 reo_92011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET H. Based on the Das and Ars entered, the spreadsheet will calculate Vrs. This volume is the volume of ponded water that will be held below the lowest orifice in the outlet structure, and above the surface of the sand filter. This volume must be at least 0.5% of V,, iv. Enter the thickness of the ASTM C-33 sand layer that will be provided, Ds. A minimum thickness of 18 inches is required. V. Below the sand layer, a minimum 10 -inch thick layer of gravel shall be installed with underdrains to drain the water that has been treated through the sand filter. The underdrains shall connect into the outlet structure. See Appendix B for standard underdrain construction. Enter the diameter of the underdrain pipe (minimum 6" dia.), and the spacing of the underdrains. The maximum spacing of the underdrains is 20 feet on center, however where the area of the bottom stage is particularly small (less than 500 square feet), the underdrain pipes shall be placed at no more than a 10 -foot separation on center. 6. Basin Outlet Design SIDE SLOPES :NTHAN 4:1 PER DISI RIC'r BASIN DESIGN GUIDELINES OR OTHER GUIDELINES ISSUED BY 1'HE vedlow/Flootf Control CO PERMITTEE_ _�_., Trash Rack Basin Design 3 r Water Surface ztl Perforate tl Dry Weather Water — Plate (t) \ Surface inattainStage—, W.O. Trash Rack I. C1// Lowest Orifice Sand Filter Layer j Figure 4: Basin Outlet Structure with Bottom Stage Shown Outlet structures for publicly maintained basins shall conform to District Standard Drawings WQ501 unless approved in advance by the local Engineering Authority (EA). This standardization is to provide for efficient maintenance. The basin outlet should be sized to release the design volume, VBMP, within a 72 -hour period but 50 percent of VBMP within 24 hours. This is an iterative design process where an appropriate control orifice can be selected using the following steps: a. Develop a Stage vs. Discharge Curve for the Outlet Structure Riverside Conmly - Lar+ Iniparl Developincol BA41, Design Handbook Page 9 icv, 9,2011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET Estimate the orifice size and outlet plate configuration (number per row, etc.). Based on Do provided in the Basin Footprint section, the spreadsheet will automatically generate the stage vs. discharge relationship for this outlet: Q = C*A* [2*g*(H-HJ] 0 s Where: Q= discharge (ft3/s) g = gravitational constant (32.2 ft2/s) C = orifice coefficient H = water surface elevation (ft) A = area of the orifice (ft) H„ = orifice elevation (ft) The lowest orifice shall be located with its centerline at the top of the bottom stage; at least 4 inches above the surface of the sand filter drain. To help avoid clogging, the minimum orifice diameter is limited to 3/8 inch. Since the 1/4 inch thickness of the orifice plate will be less than the orifice diameter, a value for C of 0.66 may be used. If another value for C is used, justification may be required. b. Develop a Discharge/Volume vs. Stage Table for the Basin Based on the shape and size of the basin, develop a relationship between the stage and the volume of water in the basin. Since the orifice spacing is 4 inches on center for the standard orifice plate, the stage intervals must also be 4 inches. Enter the basin volume at each interval starting at the centerline of the lowest orifice. c. Route the Design Volume through the Basin The spreadsheet assumes that the Design Volume, V,,, enters the basin instantaneously and as such, no inflow/outflow hydrograph is necessary. The drawdown time for each stage becomes: At=VJQ Where: At = drawdown time for each stage V; = the volume at each stage Q = the flow rate corresponding to the headwater elevation at each stage. The spreadsheet automatically determines the drawdown time from the sum of the At values for _each stage, If the orifice size and plate configuration estimate meets the Riverside Count), -Low /mpacl Deve[opmew BMP Pesign Handbook rev. 9/20/7 Page 10 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET hydraulic retention time requirements (50% of the volume empties in not less than 24 hours, 100% of the volume empties in no more than 72 hours), the outlet is correctly sized. If these requirements are not met, select a new orifice size or configuration and repeat the process starting at Step 6a. 7. Outlet Protection To prevent the orifices from clogging, trash racks are required where perforated vertical outlet control plates are used. This allows for easier access to outlet orifices for inspection and cleaning. Trash racks shall be sized to prevent clogging of the primary water quality outlet without restricting the hydraulic capacity of the outlet control orifices. The orifice plate shall be protected with a trash rack conforming to Standard Drawing WQ501 (at end of this section) with at least six square feet Overflow Structure Similar to Standard Drawing of open surface area or 25 times the NumberWQ501 total orifice area, whichever is greater. (Photo courtesy of Colorado Association of The rack shall be adequately secured to Stormwater floodplain Managers) prevent it from being removed or opened when maintenance is not occurring. Trash rack with screen Riverside CounlP - Loin lmpacl 0evelopmern BMP Design Ilandbook Page I 1 rev. 9/2011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET 8. Overflow Outlet Overflow outlets for publicly maintained basins shall conform to Standard Drawing WQ501 (at end of this section) unless approved in advance by the Engineering Authority (EA). 9. Embankment Embankments shall be designed in accordance with applicable standards of Riverside County Flood Control District's "Basin Guidelines" (Appendix C) or other guidelines issued by the Engineering Authority (EA). Where applicable, embankment designs must additionally conform to the requirements of the State of California Division of Safety of Dams. 10. Spillway and Overflow Structures Spillway and overflow structures should be designed in accordance with applicable standards of the "Basin Guidelines" (Appendix C) or other guidelines issued by the Engineering Authority (EA). Riverside Covmp, - Low lmpoc[ Developmen7 8,WP Design Handbook Page 12 rev. 9,,2011 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET Riversde Coady - Lav Impact Development BAIP Design Handbook Page 13 rev. 9/NJ I I F+ X"FENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET A -- - — \ --",iw ' noTHAtiH RACK " f VEA CALTAAvt" D77A YENFCHATEII STEL T' CL TRASH Gk FIDE PLATE NA;1K OV ONAAFLO-WFIG _ . 6" CIA 3HEM GATE N t� wE;;GMRDL ROIL F9V CLEN: 061 ^u o v 9 ! X 1 SECTION N45B1-4 DETAIL rk 1 A�, MP :SEE ❑E1AIL 0 4` STEEL fH?ME :wE.1?. SSG STESU s,A• DETAIL [3 J J t l CLE{H u`f'ENH: I5' � C: • FLCI _ STEELrATIDE + tiTLEL (LATE SECTION /` C \ *PRRDlLNARY*j Lj SUBJECT TC REyISIChi Riverside ( owai - Linc lmpm I Ocveelopmen113,11P U&S'hn 11nndhook rel. 912011 Page 14 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET STRJCTHRk STEEL '- FOREII IUTO CDNUl]E DAR--� Ft. v ALL REWFORCI13 - TEf1 SYMETWAL V DUT CErriEiELVIE ELEVATION X ^50i -a II II II l� II I II I II q 0 C) ISEE 1,ETWL "A'tl CL 0 I I 4 II �I it II II () I pt II II II II II II _ ELEVATION X ^50i -a �r REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE A6 3 C VAX V T MALL BARS BARS s' B" #q Z, tfl" #41a 18" #4d2 17" #41) 18" '2' t0" #5f t2" #a'Q 18" REAR lVkL REINFOfiCEMENT #q :01 V' OC En' SEE DiVG V4501-8 *FRE M12-4AI2,Y* k 'U8,7ECT TO RE'+IiiIUN ILII Riverside Counil>-%019Impao Developinew /3AOR Ueslgn Hnndbooh rev. 9/2071 Page 15 - l— - COERFLOW TRASH PA'K CALTHaHS %Tb �d J PEP H»A STNHIF.iS ST[0- F,01 -R3 ............. TRASHRACK ISEE 1,ETWL "A'tl _ ORFiCE - v4 ---- -'+TEEL PLATE SEE SHEET W0501rt H a y -STEEL ELAu;;E TR?NE � 13, A311 4TML1 4£ SHEET 1W501 -D a h �r REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE A6 3 C VAX V T MALL BARS BARS s' B" #q Z, tfl" #41a 18" #4d2 17" #41) 18" '2' t0" #5f t2" #a'Q 18" REAR lVkL REINFOfiCEMENT #q :01 V' OC En' SEE DiVG V4501-8 *FRE M12-4AI2,Y* k 'U8,7ECT TO RE'+IiiIUN ILII Riverside Counil>-%019Impao Developinew /3AOR Ueslgn Hnndbooh rev. 9/2071 Page 15 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET U -- -------- o , I I I I I �I h II II II li II 1 9" 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 II II II II II II II �I II It II It CLEW 9PE1.4Qp 1 1 I 1 ______1 3N"'.3/4"OM" // .NtGLE STEfL .y 19ELL SCREEN TRASH RACK SEE SM WO501-E * PRF.I,IMlNART*} ll SGdJE<:T TO REVI!iIOPI n603 AM STEEL Tdf.H WELD HUT TO 1 -FI -MICE wkI 'i ML UlEEL ''✓PS6" M,H2N FaLT u 1;2" !,IAJVLE LUT ME BUT PERF R&TEC GL?TE SEE 5HT W0301 -E A SECTION Rivenride CoJmry- Low /mpncl Developmenl 11,141' Design /landbook Page 16 "JU E>'CEPT F^H N'ElL SCREEN AU RATERI:LS IO EE STPIHIE->S STEEL. LL,NUFx OR HOT DR ';ALVAHIZpS AW -PHILT COATED I LA➢1EHi IN, HETTO:. Icv. 9/2011 z A DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET Rivciwde Co ti, -Low , „, z , Pengn Handbook , a Page 17 EXTENDED DEAmo BAs BMP FACT SHEET Rive «- Low Impoel . a.DesignHandbook via } : � \} \ \ / — / \ } . . CX - _ a § . - i \ i \ ` - \ \ \ < \ � , \ \ � » ( \ \ Rive «- Low Impoel . a.DesignHandbook via 0 EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SHEET M NHOLE FRAME Wj --PEI:FORATED STEEL a TRASH — ORIFICE PLATE + ItA^.R l' C d "T 1131111k FLOW " `\ PLATE OL Iillil I DETAIL �— J I w Lixu CLEAR OPEMIC 18" J ° FEItFOHATEiJ—it FLOi �ECrlory c 0" WA SHEAR RATE A CONTROL ROD FOR CLEAN Oln @41 x _ SECTION w^sDt- TRASH Rm:k. ,SEE DETAL 58" ANCHOR EOLTER 12" OC WELDED T9 »'EH t- DETAIL r 111 -1 PLATE V4" TXIDN £TEEN RATE n,EE T4,E E<:N HIaE PAT YJ STEEL Fp,E !W&13. 955 STEELY *PRELLSI NAR�-* SG37ECT TC RE'[ISICR Riverside Coan7y- Lola Impncl Development BMP Design Hnndhooh rel 9;2011 Page 19 EXTTNDED DETENTION BASIN BMP FACT SMET ELEVATION x ncsm-o Riverside Coan(v- Low lmpocl Developmen! RAW Design !-landbook Page 20 MAX V A&H C T WALL BARS BARS 8' 3" 4:a 18" W4CO 1e 12' 10" #50 12"' #4 Lc 'E" Ill* PRELIMI VARY* a sLIHsECT T H'E'M 1IU! J rev. 912011 Y�e,4 �i eta i,'. .. Stounaamr mnoff occurs when precipitatfon fiom min orsnowmelt flows over the ground. fmpet'loUS surfaces lite drrvewa«, sidewalks and streets prevent stonmyater from naturally soaking unto the ground sk rw Sese-water con pick up ddsis, chemicals, dirt, and other pollutants and Ilow into a Stolle sewer system or dlreuly to o lake, etr.,li r er,we1h A cr cc'._t,d :v er N'P:Ing that enter, a sto n a yet szvm n discharged w ted into tlhe wafer! die ac use to im ving. fisher t rrd providing dneking wate,. Pollumd.t.rnmrater .off can hive a� , many advuse effects on plants, Iish, anlmels, and People_ e Sediment can cloud the water e� �,`rc*• and make it dlffI.alt or .mpossible foi aquazlc plants to ;rze r Sediment als, can ie�uov aquatic habitats. • Gxcess nutrients can cause blooms. When algae die, the sink to the bottom and decanpose .r I,, a p otos, that removes oxygen Iron rp t the water fish and other aquauc organisms tint exist in water with low dissolved oxygen levels. Y • Bacteria end othvla[hegens can wash e ro `' no swim ming "'a, and cream health h , ds oftenmaking be�,eh closures i ucssary ��im> ase t Debt i - plastic bags, six-pack angs, bottle, and clgaretW buts --washed lel) wzimrbedles can choke, sefmnt, or disable agraCil life like ducks, fish, turtles, and birds. • Household haze,doos wastes like insecticide', pestiddei5, 1111111 solvents, used motor oil, and other auto fluids can poison aquatic life_ land animals and people can become sick or he Iron, eating diseased fish and shellfish or ingesting polluted water. Pollmt 1 sto,mVtater often affects drinking water sources 'Phis, In tofu, can alfect human health :"Id inerts 1' eking water o'eatment co_I,. 4 Revgrev,, o -t prtopeA dapaee of fwag/W& Para L fleet EWmfeawc claeacaPe, cad w uue?&4,W, paVcih, peva P—s,' auel A edo-t '� of Wl n aura �aidi Auto tare Washing your car and deg reasir t auto plot, at hunt I'll, .end deter en s and le I mnh..III Int tern 4h the tormse•v r y tun Uumn { uwnaoGze Iluld ii U worn c!rains has [it(, same resalta, domping the matennls directly into a avaterbody. d + , <aP -rc -a ar - - 0Use a commercial car wash that vests or Deli, tpWan. ffeGm Etz & grsawa.vs arch 41 dWW. Mcycles its wastewater, or rh our car on d olh•wue,,shinit, intolhe Lawn (are } I_ es sent nil t to a., pplie 7 I" i; t if, yard t v ash ill n n In addrtinn wird ' plb and t.s ern stoma di urs and Manor nuoients a -d o yank matter to ,creams. • Dor t c er ,Iter your [,vin Consider osirt a taker ho,onn,'ead of spnt d, leer f ie; ndferuluu pa e ch ni h inti m ss Iv ase these.[c amel an the raommende, Brno ant he organ ntIceve �(er pest ollrol methods, [cattier po_�yble. • Compost or mulch yard waste, Don't leave h m the street ler .v.eei r u into storm orvds or su'eams • Cover kyles of dirt (a mot h being used in landscaping projects. nouryar s. c .. I «nmd • Repair lock_ and dispose of used auto liars, and sentence at designated dropoll or recc!ire locations. Septic Pet haste systems r 1 envas[c n se 4 Lc kin Inclso vcc o bacteria slid poi rA monniatnen " esoc,s nufncnts to local udter, septic N. 3 I systems release aumene and •When wvalkirg pathogens (bacteria and ynur pet. viruses( list can be picked up remember to per or, the by stormv:aler and discharged wane and dispose of it I.C. near by v laeisodies ..popelis I -Inching per Pathogens call cause Public wash a the be. t disposal health problems and meth d I c a in€ pet t c environmental concerns, on Eli, ground t a..reeu r Inspect your system every 'Pubitc health risks by 's years and pumpyoLL allowing harmful bacteria dank as necessan,(even, 3 and nalriele, to trash into to5.yems) the,tom drain and eventually in I,, local Dont dispose of waterbodies- hoti=_ahold hazardous waste in Looks or toilets. Dirt, ui and debus that collect un parking Ion and Paved areas can be �Y ri washed Into the storm sewer. system ;and eventually en[ervlocal waterboches Sweep up litter and debris from sidewalks, ylrlveways -cold parking lots, i especially around stores dal `# Cover grease storage and dumpsters and keep there dean to avoid leaks. , Report any chemical spill to the local hazardous waste cleanup team They'll knew the best way to keep spills from [aiming the environml Eihw, as a wraiid to r/mrc3uy p illki belopea. Srgxe au( ewsirts wart J&U, di were viirod� rktp,Aaave adedr .threes Low, bewa�ted wdnna�eZ[ ircir m %arra£. watrx6ody. PNic�Cat�(CeG �aruldcapicr9 Permeable Pavemc t l c - acaaal s it -Ilowt a ,.I -.p, ae'll nirfac p nom drains to dr -. ntd Va_ R t f il Vavement I1 it, 11A'Iamul;[. to r se oR it f Y, L <4 Rar C ens an Crew S..ICE... SI+st o wis ale t I red P,... ,tk,,,,lo, sttsfoi �wpiyt)y,g.gyg CIII,.Ild sl�flll "I'll It f i I. ....IC Iv �t t �s -� . _ i s t o cr a• to etc n d r,ns. Vr,,t.U,dFl[ Strip a' 'of n: {, plea a iatoa Gro ia:yso the, Ir.it tile ols lonnwete, "I'll LI, all 1a horn dr,. was, nd strec... l rosion COLIWAS that art n t t Interned Call Cause excessive amcunts of sediment and debt, to be canned iLao tile 'lormwa[er systel,-Collar Jcuon cehick, c ar. Icak fuel, oil and other harmful fluids that can be picked up by list nvaterand deposited into local wtaCdLsrdi,, • Divert stonnwat,r away (roll dfstursed or expcaed areas of the ce h: t ction sits • Install silt fences Ml,dc mud Mnwva dress, vegetative cover, and olhca sediment and erosion console and properly maintain them, c""Cially alter rtinstcne,_ e Prevent soil erosion by mwimfxin£ dismrh,d areas during construct!on Protects, and seed ,Incl at t tIc bare areas a leo as possible. e5:r Lac k of legetaLion on streambaeks oil,, lead to ucsio a Overgrazed pas ures can nCo con II 1xi e cxcessnc amour h of sediment to local n terl odie s. xce s f t ilizoo, and posurcides can poison raquatic an m al=and lead to de tlnQlVe algc blooms. I ivc tock in ire n s can contaminate eso,vz ars with bar teria, mardog them t i ale for honha h contact. • Keep livestock away tion encando ks lacef provide t hem I. water Le marc c a say cont v terbodice tuxt ;,. Store and apt Iv n a:zav em hv tcrsodies and in ccomancc 11iih a nuuient nam ,cri plan_ a • Ve£etate riC iia acasalong z tears},. mBf • Rotate afli,Id ,sang to an,vent son erosion an Ilelds- e Amplyfe«ilizcr and pesti6des a¢ardin£ io label insuvctions cc .ate money' nd minimae pollution_ Improperly nanaycnlogging opal tion, can rasoi, it erosion and sell imcntatfon. • Conduct pruharvcst plane r- u, prevent erosion red iQ,', msts- eU,elogging methodsa nd<oh1prent Uaat l uu:e Soil dlstlbano, hn end do fpr nkid tails i zea,. and tar,k IL,oss roads to nhininaae Inlain ere,"I';;n t avoid diso.d +ane f -est Horn. • Consnct uta n c c sing w that they m t nue erosion ahs pi ol"al < 'nets to sveam,. • [zPeditc rcac;ctatien of ckamd auras_ ELI, tit gacting ttag-'lo, .ill Wbe Warned into ltolln di'lins Caiseacing to be repaired C<m Icak luef oil, and other I at fel ileus Cast can b { rake i tip byet,elowdtol • Clean op "ths'umnetlianely acct pooped, dt I .e of de a n to!"d, • I lcover t ['ckagstsionSaod desi+„d onelmitt fa 'htil = for spill nnmenL e illaint.an fle,,r volicics o lire eat eta;: lad oth, ra_J.r ycae,n heroin •d Imo Ile a v,nibodies. h Mall and ma u a I' encs sapardtoIS E E w C J N@> L 3 0 N C m $ O C C a- o N E O E@ E tOm w `oc�E t0 0 p N E E o o @ @ mE E m . O@ .m N N@ aEi c 3c@@ Z• 3 3 d @ -- o m v« o@ w a o. w o @@ O J U C@ L o@ N "' - E `o w0 L o c p v 4J E E "6 01- T O 0.O 'O N O myw O 5 3 .nd m O O"O NL 6�@ N 00 wo o y c N N n.o C m E c m c m `c L E m E_a le N> @C o,t.0ON T> a E E m N-00N mNZ�Ot °>' c@ 3 N o � m m O@ @ � m E m 3@ E� m o N0Eo E I o @coc ow�a E d N \ m V N vc-i 0 X N O L N >` L a Y N L C O EU -@N Cm wu - NN EJ ✓Ec N O> N@C O > LcO OwEO= .Vw.I 0,5 o m oc ap .o o_m E r g y cc- T oo W n,Xoo ocO@ CJN_•@.• UC YN OC i q N@ O O c �O (Q # EG O NE ,tr OEmw 'c0-6o 3 @ x p-Koa O=.@cam Q° yw@N oQmm 1 =, °'V-�'.n �_�ow W:=76 a@i orm U) C C C E W.- E C @ O@ E L @ > C O w N @ O O U C _ N N 1N ` yCL y R 0 CL 0 w CL C1 CIt o t a O 6 CO m � a c 0= O y o co 0 r m E U d D N V L O O N E N d m o ro N C@ N M N W M c N Q p c> 'N �. N iii w EQ m U N o mace N N Q mro m o o LO 6Lr) °0 'oQ Eo -'�n N�-i� ooh o2N DE o v..� d o� M o 1 - > OjZE>S1. >.w W O O �67�007 Q WO O Z Oo CD N U OYU N _E J d QIco v 1 m @O E T @ no w hf� b5 O Z J W❑ U d N l� o Q N tN F: � < Uww WU' E i�aQ'o i 'p ;o LL V a O - w p O1C� LNN N NN CN� 3 O d� T Yo 0 0 �t oLL .00m @ W dm m �Dp mL a I( Np1�CD �'LN N C_LAmEO NNVI �C0L.. C N O O- E m, p W C N N @ @ C U N N .r 3 N o ° E m E m 5 0E P a t in 3 E m o a< �vEo�oo d-oD wm mDc°m3v�° o�°oE Q,o Qi ,3'ir dCpwv°ca mEo � oN.aL�° @ �03c Y o @ 3 O O U ,. L 3 U ¢ �Gm O U m N C d N'Q°3 NY 10vEi E /� N mLCCLJ 3 N N 3 N O m m p' EN 10 C mNC M J �J Oft -min @N o.0E@ °' Dn uti �i ass, t £ m N d E C C m d O.`9 L E C .p `p S \3 J r ✓+ m o N Ea �1 U O m C U@ p c m 0 c a c m 0 Yc N U .O O U� c m 3 °1 a m m m cr 'o �° i < rea 41; a ^'c vNi 'O'er C TOY '° 'O m W N D E J m C N C V D o Y N u@i nJ o rn m m o• E o 3 c N° 'N U C@ V U t ell L J O C U U O n o t � Nm`o �U�°cnc in in �a 3NU°Ua main �', pis ai .. .. .. e 4 C.� s O N O m� C c m N pV p @ o c@ a o N N d m= o c o. o � 1 N m S) L rN. C L j O N L` O d@ E` C N O m a V N C D O L V _Cw.. D N O' T N O 3 O NryN0N>OILDN,vm p 7E.Er Omm¢L �NN�t/ C6m -O :F=NU[@J�O�C omcmENO v S m a= c r S= c u N v@i 'v m E3 n OC�EC'o `oaf KULnr Y3°w-Uorof`O'n ��w �w �i Vo m�m�au3 m m c a > ILL T O` B `ry L 0 O.3 m d = o d L N m C@ E C O C> C Y p.t w Q ry N E C i om¢�o, tN rn�Em�vm3 Jm �nm D y uD N@ N>@ O. m@ U Ol E .. W m aNi a 2O @ U` D@ O� @ C N D c at N ¢ @ Y �2G c D G .p an d N N c@ -C @ o@ C O m E m L N@ O C@ N J m C N UD NU m0`5 mom.` V @ 3 G N p L t L L O E d@ d �i mY U 3 u a¢ 3 3d' mdn0: d E UU. cli Ili U °€ E s ui t � t Y O tl) a a CL tS LL U °€ E s ui t � t Y tl) a a ,U} tS LL rye VJ ui a tS x E E }{ O Rs M e HN GG Qj psi y5p Mf Eli %. My 1 E &:a f� 5 E • now 4 _ F6 ;5 i E p L i IT I l e F L- � Cd b S (1 ;Y � 5 Y1 His �- L so ?` s a n L El: Q N 3 y n h a fi v l .oma d 1 NOW EJ111N a V w b `•, q o p E� r CJ e HN GG Qj psi y5p Mf Eli %. My 1 E &:a f� HN GG F S5 r' Mf gilt, %. 1 E &:a r 5 E • now 4 _ F6 ;5 i E p L i l e tgG L- � �A S q ;Y � 5 Y1 v �- L y C ?` a n L N 3 y n h CC _P GG F S5 r' Mf gilt, %. 1 E &:a 5 E • 4 _ F6 ;5 i E p L i l e tgG f F S q ti£ � 5 Y1 PX 44 �- IA ,I at 4. 0 > T 0 p, J, o we r, In n-, �i A, i3 Z o r), Rj A Ov i- p ,I at 4. 0 > T 0 p, J, o we r, In n-, �i A, Rj A J, o we N n-, �i A, Rj A Ov i- p Z o N n-, Rj A ssaulsnq loq aqJ U auo6uV sujpollon llsuoo saappnEl 3w0H saadolanap .a0; id11181 SaaflaeM IutafieueW Isau `l 4 eva.. jr �) /lam u 1 1. ��Y 1 iu NOISHIUMIS HIS 79 N0113081SN031 'wngaaq sigl ul raplAmd uo0euuolul sol U01SIAin la0we6eueyy JaleMmiSS SR105UV SOI to App agl rue ww6md iale/ytuealp ap,+Alunop epauiely 'wei6md Iwluop uognllod lupduoN AalleA eie10 elueS aql SaOpalMouv,ae Allnlaler0 weifimd uoyoalad ialeMuealOPaluMwIDIS agl waas�oad Ivollo3load JOWAkulJOIS ase sapdu Alllelll)laleM/roch/sldarlen'v0 aplSlaAIJ 00 MMM le apsgarm we'6md uo0aalmd raleMuealOPaleMwslS eq) liSIA to 00S 1-996 (606) Ileo aseold SaIllApoe uolluanad uopnllod jaglo uo u09awJ0l1J1 u!elgo of 'o samgomq leuo0ype rapio of 999Z-909-009-1, :Ileo 'weep w.wis P066013 e jo 6wdwnp lefiapl us podau of 9gog-996(606) :Ileo 'asoc 1p alsem snopuezeg pue 6ullokoaj ioj tf6 :Ileo A0ua6lawa us ul w 00:9,alle S4Z9-a9e (6061 in it ao:S-'w'e 00:9 9909-99E (606) weal asuodsa8 Aouolhawq SlepoleA sn)pSezeH Alunop GidsJaAl l :Iles 'lllds Stol lew snop.lezeq a liodaut of StormWater Pollution .. What You Should Know Riverside County has two drainage systems - sewers and storm drains. The storm drain system was designed to reduce flooding by carrying excess rainwater away from streets and developed areas. Since the storm drain system does not provide for water treatment, it also serves the unintended function of transporting pollutants directly to our local waterways. Unlike sanitary sewers, storm drains are riot connected to a wastewater treatment plant - they flow directly to our local streams, rivers and lakes. Slormwater runoff is a part of the natural hydrologic process. However, land development and construction activities can significantly alter natural drainage processes and introduce pollutants into stormwater runoff. Polluted stormwater runoff from construction sites has been identified as a major source of water pollution in California. It jeopardizes the quality of our local waterways and can pose a serious threat to the health of our aquatic ecosystems. The Cities and County of Riverside StormWater/CleanWater Protection Program Because preventing pollution is much easier and less costly than cleaning up "after the fact," the Cities and County of Riverside t;.+. StormWater/CleanWater Protection Program informs residents and businesses on pollution prevention activities. This pamphlet describes various Best Management Practices (BM Ps) that construction site operators can use to prevent stormwater pollution. In accordance with applicable federal and state law, the Cities and County of Riverside have adopted ordinances for stormwater management and discharge control that prohibit the discharge of pollutants into the storm drain system or local surface water. This includes discharges from construction sites containing sediment, concrete, mortar, paint, solvents, lubricants, vehicle fluids, fuel, pesticides, and construction debris. PLEASE NOTE: The Federal, State and local regulations strictly prohibit the discharge of sediment and pollutants into the streets, the storm drain system or waterways. As an owner, operator or supervisor of a construction site, you may be held financially responsible for any environmental damage caused by your subcontractors or employees. /6gobM/-/A06 e0'gOJMS'MMM ZS6Z-L9b (899) t'ZfZ6 V9 'o6a11) u0s V allnS' PAI9 esaW luowanelo fLL6 6 uoibaa - paeog lwluoC Alllenp JaleM leuol6aa 06014 ueS /9gObM1-/A06 e0 go1MS'MMM 0£f b-Z8L(606) 8b££-f09Z6 VO 'aP!S0A!a Los allns 'laa-0S ule" L£L£ 9 uol6aa - pieog loiluoo Rllleno u01eAA leu0169a euV elueS /I gobMI-/Ao6 e0 goilys mMM f61,L-9b£(09)) 09ZZ6 VC 'lJaseG wled OOf almS'anu4 6uueM paJd OZ) -C)_ L uol6aa - fluting Icoluoo Al!leno JaleM leu0160a Mao JOAla OPWO100 /11Mw10JS/A06 eo g0)MS'MMM 99b9-fb£(9 1,6) t, 096 VC oluawe-iOeS hauls 1100 f A81eno Jale/N to uo!SIAIO pueog loiluoo soounosaa jejeM ele1S saaaaol STORMWATER POLLUTION FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES The two most common sources of stormwater pollution problems associated with construction activities are erosion and sedimentation. Failure to maintain adequate erosion and sediment controls at construction sites often results in sediment discharges into the storm drain system, creating multiple problems once it enters local waterways. Construction vehicles and heavy equipment can also track significant amounts of mud and sediment onto adjacent streets. Additionally, wind may transport construction materials and wastes into streets storm drains, or directly into our local waterways. What Should You Do? Advance Planning to Prevent Pollution Remove existing vegetation only as needed. _1 Schedule excavation, grading, and paving operations for dry weather periods, if possible. Designate a specific area of the construction site, well away from storm drain inlets or watercourses, for material storage and equipment maintenance. _J Develop and implement an effective combination of erosion and sediment controls for the construction site. Practice source reduction by ordering only the amount of materials that are needed to finish the project. - Educate your employees and subcontractors about stormwater management requirements and their pollution prevention responsibilities. i Control the amount of surface runoff at the construction site by impeding internally generated flows and using berms or drainage ditches to direct incoming offsite flows to go around the site. Note: Consult local drainage policies for more Information. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted a new Construction Activities General Permit (WQ Order No. 99- 08DWQ) on August 19, 1999, superseding the now expired SWRCB statewide General Permit (WQ Order No. 92-08DWQ). This permit is administered and enforced by the SWRCB and the local Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB). The updated Construction Activities General Permit establishes a number of new stormwater management requirements for construction siteoperator. NOTE: Some construction activies stormwater permits are issued on a regional basis. Consult yourlome R WQCS to find oul if your project requires coverage under any of thesepermits. Frequently Asked Questions: Does my construction site require coverage under the Construction Activities General Permit? Yes', if construction activity results in the disturbance of five or more acres of total land area or is part of a common plan of development that results in the disturbance of five or more acres. How do I obtain coverage under the Construction Activities General Permit? Obtain the permit package and submit the completed Notice of Intent (NOI) form to the BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) can significantly reduce pollutant discharges from your construction site. Compliance with stormwater regulations can be as simple as minimizing stormwater contact with potential pollutants by providing covers and secondary containment for construction materials, designating areas away from storm drain systems for storing equipment and materials and implementing good housekeeping practices at the construction site. i Protect all storm drain inlets and streams located near the construction site to prevent sediment -laden water from entering the storm drain system, J Limit access to and from the site Stabilize construction entrances/exits to minimize the track out of dirt and mud onto adjacent streets. Conduct frequent street sweeping. Protect stockpiles and construction materials from winds and rain by storing them under a roof, secured impermeable tarp or plastic sheeting. F_3 Avoid storing or stockpiling materials near storm drain inlets, gullies or streams. J Phase grading operations to limit disturbed areas and duration of exposure. j Perform major maintenance and repairs of vehicles and equipment offsite. Wash out concrete mixers only in designated washout areas at the construction site. Set-up and operate small concrete mixers on tarps or heavy plastic drop cloths. „j Keep construction sites clean by removing trash, debris, wastes, etc. on a regularbasis. General Permit) SWRCB prior to grading or disturbing soil at the construction site. For ongoing construction activity involving a change of ownership, the new owner must submit anew NOI within 30 days of the date of change of ownership. The completed NOI along with the required fee should be mailed lathe SWRCB. What must / do to comply with the requirements of the Construction Activities General Permit? ;n Implement BMPs for non-stormwater discharges year-round. €v, Prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to commencing construction activities. _r Keep a copy of the SWPPP at the construction site for the entire duration of the project, Calculate the anticipated stormwater run- off. Implement an effective combination of erosion and sediment control on all soil disturbed areas. Conduct site inspections prior to anticipated storm events, every 24 -hours during extended storm events, and after actual storm event. Perform repair and maintenance of BMPs as soon as possible after storm events depending upon worker safety. -„Z Clean-up spills immediately using dry clean-up methods (e.g., absorbent materials such as cat litter, sand or rags for liquid spills; sweeping for dry spills such as cement, mortar or fertilizer) and by removing the contaminated soil from spills on dirt areas.. Prevent erosion by implementing any or a combination of soil stabilization practices such as mulching, surface roughening, permanent or temporary seeding. ,.} Maintain all vehicles and equipment In good working condition. Inspect frequently for leaks, and repair promptly. _} Practice proper waste disposal. Many construction materials and wastes, including solvents, water-based paint, vehicle fluids, broken asphalt and concrete, wood, and cleared vegetation can be recycled. Materials that cannot be recycled must be taken to an appropriate landfill or disposed of as hazardous waste. -,s Cover open dumpsters with secured tarps or plastic sheeting. Never clean out a dumpster by washing it down on the construction site. „aF Arrange for an adequate debris disposal schedule to insure that dumpsters do not overflow. }: Update the SWPPP as needed, to manage pollutants or reflect changes in site conditions. } Include description of post construction BMPs at the construction site, including parties responsible for long-term maintenance. NOTE: Please refer to the Construction Activities General Permit for detailed information. You may contact the SWRCB, your local RWQCB, or visit fire SWRCB website at wwwswrcb ca gov/sforrawle' to obtain a State Construction Activities Stormwater GenerelPennitpacket. How long is this Construction Activities General Permit in effect? The Permit coverage stays in effect untllyou submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the SWRCB. For the purpose of submitting a NOT, all soil disturbing activities have to be completed and one of the three following criteria has to be. met: 1. Changeofownership; 2. A uniform vegetative cover with 70 percent coverage has been established; or, 3. Equivalent stabilization measures such as the use of reinforced channel liners, soil cement, fiber matrices, geotextiles, etc., have been employed. Ij ap NO ZZ, m 0 0 Em / ry $ l ( la J pwy dD i r t v JJ !z n ( .. [ ( u y. u C ' Yrm�t W.a ret to ( s- 'es' P. ../ eats / D J I f 06 gA 094 "ax / ry $ l ( la IA 7J 12 T © o 1 fZ rs; LU IA 12 fZ rs; Stormwater Pollution Found in Your Area! This is not a citation. This is to inform you that our staff found the following pollutants in the storm sewer system in your area. This storm sewer system leads directly to J Motor oil J Oil filters J Antifreeze/ transmission fluid J Paint J Solvent/degreaser J Cooking grease J Detergent J Home improvement waste (concrete, mortar) J Pet waste J Yard waste (leaves, grass, mulch) J Excessive dirt and gravel J Trash J Construction debris J Pesticides and fertilizers ❑ Other For more information or to report an illegal discharge of pollutants, please call: Riverside County Residents, Call .. . 1.800-506.2555 ICOFEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency www. epa. go vinpdes/s tonnwater EPA 833-F-03-002 April 2003 Stormwater runoff is precipitation from rain or snowmelt that flows over the ground. As it flows, it can pick up debris, chemicals, dirt, and other pollutants and deposit them into a storm sewer system or waterbody Anything that enters a storm sewer system is dischargeduntreatedfnto the waterbodies we use for swimming, fishing, and providing drinking water. Remember: Only Rain Down the Drain To keep the stormwater leaving your home or workplace clean, follow these simple guidelines: ♦ Use pesticides and fertilizers` ` sparingly 46 Repair auto leaks. ♦ Dispose of ' household hazardous waste,used auto fluids (antifreeze, oil, etc. j, and batteries at designated collection or recycling locations. Clean up after your pet. ♦ Use a commercial car wash or wash your car on a lawn or other unpaved surface. 0 Sweep up yard debris rather than hosing down areas. Compost or recycle yard waste when possible. ♦ Clean paint brushes in a sink, not outdoors. Properly dispose of excess paints through a household hazardous waste collection program. Sweep up and properly dispose of construction debris like concrete and mortar. ismer. _ I A Am FM now for Home and Property Owners on Stream stabilization Homeowners living adjacent to streams, lakes and rivers may be impacted by stream hank erosion or sediment deposition that can occur due to natlnal processes of man-made causes. However, el'folIS to mitigate Iheao impacts in, or adjacent to watercourses can negatively affect native plants and animals, lessen a watercourse's ability to convey stn'm flows, and cause hooding Below are some facts to keep our " watercourses lice of obsu'uctions and information on actions a homeowner should take before attempting to protect their property: • In some cases, alteration of a watercourse may be prohibited by local land -use regulations, e.g., a "drainage easement', "flowage easement", "floodplain' or "Environmental Constraint Sheet." You should contact your local City or County Building Agency or Grading Department to determine if these limitations apply to you. • In cases where alterations are not prohibited, grading, Pilling -in or otherwise altering a watercourse -even those that flow intermittently, such as dry washes that only flow when it rains— may require approval front one or more of the following agencies: FjEGUtiATING AGENCY APPRQVAL CONTACT Local (City, County) land use authority " Gading Permit, White pages under • I loodplain City/County Government Review California Department offish and Game' US Army Corps of Engineers* California State Water Resourees Control Bona V • Fish and Cianhc www.dfg.ca.gov Section 1602 Agreements • Clean Walei Act www.usace.anuy.mil Section 404 Permit • Clean Water Act www.swreb.ca.gov Section 401 Watess Quality Certification or Waste Discharge Requirements • Property owners should CONTACT EACH REGULATING AGENCY (listed above) for the necessary approval(s) BEFORE: .. I. Removing soil, rock or plant material fi-om a strcambed of the bank of a stream; 2. P/acing any waste, material (dirt, rubble) of structures (dams, revetments) within or on the bank of a stream; 3. Diverting obstructing, of otherwise modifying the bed, channel, or bank of any river, strcann or lake; - 4. Disposing or depositing debris, liquid or solid waste, soil or other material that may be conveyed into a wash, stream, river or lake; or 5. Arnioring of .stabilizing a stream bank against stream bank erosion. More oeseo Some other examples of regulated activities include construction of road Stream crossings, vegetation removal, construction of corrals and storing manure. Property owners are responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals prior to itpbiiixation commencing any of the aforementioned activities. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) makes onsite recommendations (as of this writing, free of charge) to private land owners for effective erosion controls. For help in protecting your property from natural watercourses please contact: Natural Resources Conservation-ServicePHONE NRCS) NO. Moreno Valley (951) 656-6800 Blythe service Center. (760) 922-3446 Indio Service Center (760) 347-7658 *Service fees may be applicable. YOU can help: Protect water quality - prevent trash, debris and waste of any kind from washing off home sites and streets into gutters, storm drains and dry washes. These watercourses empty into streams that flow to rivers. Couutli-wide Service Information • Household hazardous wastes (oil-based paints, pesticides, antifree motor oil, batteries and fluorescent bulbs) must never be disposed o in or near watercourses. You may find your nearest household hazardous waste disposal site by calling (800) 304-2226 or on the web at www.riveowm.org • Report illegal grading or dumping in watercourses by contacting your City or County Code Enforcement Department, or call (800) 506-2555. Report a non -emergency crime such as dumping by contacting yor City Police or County SherrifPs Department, or call (800) 506-2555 Appendix 11: Conditions of Approval Conditions of Approval 39 21— City Council Meeting Minutes —September 12, 2006 UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCELMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY, BICKMAN, KELLEY, SCEHFNER, MAGEE NONE NONE NONE MOVED BY SCHIF NER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-149 ADOPTING TENTATrVWGONDONMWUM MAP NO.33267 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE OUTLINED FOR THE RIGHT-OF- WAY AND AN IVY -LIKE PLANT ON THE EXTERIOR BLOCK WALLS. MOVED BY SCHIFTNER, SECONDED BY HIC:KMAN TO ADOPT —' RESOLUTION NO. 2006-150 ADOPTING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09. Mayor Magee noted that 7 dwelling units per acre was more than acceptable. He noted that the landscape plan included additional enhancements and larger tree sizes than the minimum requirement. He noted that the size of the units went from 1,200 to 1,800 square feet. He noted that there were 3 different architectural styles throughout the development. He noted that he felt the end result would be a quality project. THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Contract Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, Contract Consultants or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the subject project, Agenda Imn No._ Page 21 of 53 Page 22 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 2. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred and Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) to enable the City to File the Notice of Determination. Said filing fee shall be provided to the City within 48 hours of project approval, SPECMC PLAN NO. 2004-01 & ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-01 3. The Draft Village at Lakeshore Specific Pian shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. A Final Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 4. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document, 5. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc, not addressed in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are proposed. 6. The applicant shall participate and annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate. The applicant shall provide all project -related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document. 8. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 and its Mitigation Monitoring Program. 9. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. ngcaa IU=No._ Pegc22 or 53 Page 23 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 _ 10,The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. TENTATIVECONDONIINIUM MAP NO. 33267 11.The Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time the CC&R's and an appropriate instrument has been filed and recorded with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 12.7he Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 13.Prior to final certificate of occupancy of Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 14.Prior to approval of the Final Map the Tentative Parcel Map shall be modified to a one lot Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes. 15.Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall prepare and record CC&R's against the condominium complex. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee and the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall include methods of maintaining common areas, parking and drive aisle areas, landscaped areas including parkways, and methods for common maintenance of all underground, and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to support the complex. In addition, the CC&R's shall establish methods to address design improvements. 16.No unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to financially assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which Agenda I=Na.—_ Pale 23 of A Page 24 — City°Council Meeting Minutes —September i2, 2006 _ have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and duty to maintain, all said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 17.Provisions to restrict parking upon other than approved and developed parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions and restrictions for each project. 18.Membership in the Home Owner's Association shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. 19.Reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of all development phases as they are completed, and embody one (1) homeowner's association with common area for the total development of the subject project. 20.In the event the association or other legally responsible person(s) fail to maintain said common area in such a manner as to cause same to constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement procedures and impose a lien for the costs of such abatement upon said common area, individual units or whole thereof as provided by law. 21 Each unit owner shall have full access to commonly owned areas, facilities and utilities. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09 Appall No,_ Pogo 24 or 53 Page 25 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 _ 22.Design Review approval for Residential Project No. 2005-09 will lapse and be void after one (1) year of the approval date unless construction is diligently pursued. (Modified by Planning Commission 8-15-06) 23.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b) (2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square foot as assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 24.All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 25.All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plan. 26.Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 27.Future site plotting and construction within Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 shall comply with the standards and requirements of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. Future site plotting shall be shown on precise Agwda Item No` page 25 of 53 Page 26— City Council Meeting Minutes —September 12, 2006 grading plans, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 28.All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 29.Any revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 30.Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 31.Provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by T- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of theme trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units. 32.The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain sheet addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 33.7he applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineering Manager. AThe applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 35.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 36.The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. Agc%41=Nn._ Pw 26 ur 53 Page 27 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 37.The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 38.The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 39.All mechanical and electrical equipment shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. 40.All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the " Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. 41.Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 42.The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. 43.All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy. 44.A11 landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. Agenda lean No _ pate27 or A Page 28— City Council Meeting Minutes —September 12, 2606 45.The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. 467he Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. 47.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 48.The Final landscaping and irrigation plans shall include vine plantings and necessary irrigation methods along the outside of the project perimeter walls located along the entire length of the Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue frontages and along the entire length of the eastern property Iine. The specific number and location of the vine plantings shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. (Added by City Council 9-12-06) 49.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the — exception that wrought -iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 50.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20'. 51.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 52.These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 53.The Homeowner's Association shall facilities, including the project str drainage improvements. maintain all project improvements and ,ots, landscaping, park facilities, and _ 54.Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. Agenda It m No.__ ?w 26 or 53 Page29 — City Council Meeting Minutes— September 12, 2006 _ 55.The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Fee (MSHCP) will be due upon issuance of each building permit. 56.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 57.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 58.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. 59.The applicant shall at all times comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-21 (APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION 8-15-06) 60.Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 approved herein shall lapse and shall become void one (1) year following the date on which the use permit became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site. 61.The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with the all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; Title 17 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 62.The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. ENGINEERING General Requirements: 63.A grading plan signed and stamped by a _ shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 pattern is substantially modified as determ grading is less than 50 cubic yards and Calif. Registered Civil Engineer cubic yards or the existing flow ined by the City Engineer. If the a grading plan is not required, a A& M& tum Ne.._ PW29 or 53 Page 30— City Council Meeting Minutes —September 12, 2006 grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 64.Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 65.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 66.This project shall comply with the recommendations of the traffic study prepared by Webb and Associates, dated October 12, 2005. 67.Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 68.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right- of-way. 69.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 70.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), .and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 71.Applicant shall obtain any necessary Caltrans permits and meet all Caltrans requirements for any work within Caltrans right-of-way. 72.Applicant shall obtain any necessary County permits and meet all County requirements for any work within County right-of-way. 73.The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 74.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. nsmaai=rw.` Fqc 30 or 9 Page 31— City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 _ 75.The applicant shall incorporate bus bays in the street design unless not required by RTA. 76.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUME, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. 77.10 year stone runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 78.A11 drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 79.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ''/z" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 80.Slope maintenance along right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association. 81.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association. 82.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 83.0n -site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. Agenda 1e No _ Pegs 31 of 53 Page 32—City Council Meeting Minutes—September 12, 2006 84 -All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 85 -Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area 86 -Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including th submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required pell the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 87.Educadon guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 88.Applieant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Requiredfor lot ofone acre or more) 89.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. in accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances probibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non -storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver — is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Approval of final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the subdivider shall complete the following or have pians submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted: 90.Construct the traffic signal at State -Route 74 (Riverside Drive) and Grand FW 32 of $3 Page 33 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 Avenue. 4, -southbound deceleration Iane on State Route 74 shall be provided 91.lntgdpr_su=ts shall be privately maintained and shall have a minimum width of 28' unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. 91.Construct and dedicate right-of-way on State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) from the channel to Grand Avenue per City's General Plan (half width + 12' improvements). The improvements: include sidewalk improvements over the flood control channel to sidewalk improvements at the school site and a temporary ac sidewalk improvement from Grand Avenue to existing s0 walk approximately 390 feet south of Grand Avenue The applicant shall construct the required landscaped median along State Route 74, Should Caltrans not approve the median, the applicant shall pay cash in-Iieu of improvements for half -width of the required median improvements. Construct a deceleration lane for the pmject,entrance on SR 74, The project entrance on SR 74 shall be right-in/out only. 92.Construct and dedicate right-of-way on Grand Avenue from the.:project boundary to State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) per City General Plan (part- width improvements). Full improvements shall be required from the old Riverside Drive to State Route 74. Cash bond in -lieu of construction of median improvements may be provided subject to City Engineer's approval. Full access shall be provided at the project entrance off of Grand Avenue. 93.Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 94.Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 95.Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 96.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Map. All land so offered shall be Wanted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. Agenda tum No._ Page33 or 53 Page 34 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 97. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements and a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the project to be approved prior to final map approval. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 98. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications, hnprovements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond ,property limits. 99. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 100. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 101. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located new the project entrances that minimize sight distance standards. 102. Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 103. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 104. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any Ascnb Item No.__,__ Nc 34 or s3 Page 35 — City Council Meeting Minutes — September 12, 2006 _ hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 105. The applicant sba11 obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 106. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A' in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 107. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. Prior to issuance of Building Permit 108. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building pemut. 109. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. I10. No structures, landscaping, or equipment shall be located new the project entrances that minimisight distance standards. 111. Pay all Capital Improvement TTF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (L.EMC 16.34). Prior to Recordation of Final Map Ape"u=wo._ Page 35 or 53 Page 36— City Council Meeting Minutes— September 12, 2006 112. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall process a roadway vacation such that the right-of-way is consistent with the boundaries as described in the approved Specific Plan. In the event that a roadway vacation cannot be accomplished, the applicant shall submit revised plans to the City for approval. (Added by City Council 9-12-06) Prior to Occupancy 113. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 114. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x I I" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 115. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 116. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 117. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 118. The traffic signal at SR 74 and Grand Avenue shall be operational prior to ? Occupancy. The applicant shall notify the City at least one month in advance should the signal tum on be delayed due to Caltrans review and approval or any anticipated delays. The City Engineer may allow certain occupancy prior to signal turn on if warranted. 119. Pay fair share costs of offsite improvements as identified in the traffic study. The fair share costs calculations shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the City Engineer. 120. Proof of maintenance responsibility and acceptance shall be provided for A4crA hem No._,_ Fw36 of s3 Page 37— City Council Meeting Minutes— September l2, 2006 all open space, slopes, and drainage facilities, outside the public right-of- way. 121. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 122.Prior to the approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. 123. Pri or to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right -off -way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. 124. Devel oper shall pay both Fire Station Impact Fee and Other Impact Fees 125. Upo n completion of the Fire Station Impact Study and other impact fee studies, Developer shall pay impact fee. I26. Devel oper shall pay CFD for Park, Parkway, Open Space and Storm Drain Maintenance 127. Pri or to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the new parks, parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. _ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 12$. Devel oper to pay park fees of $1,600 per unit ($233,600). AgrnM J=No.. _ hp 57 of s3 Page 38— City Council Meeting Minutes— September 12, 2006 129. All interior landscape, recreation areas, facilities and/or open space to be maintained by the HOA. No park credits. 130. Developer to comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 131. Developer to participate in City-wide LLMD. 132. Developer to annex into LLMD District I for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City. 133. All interior streets and/or roadways to be maintained by the HOA. 134. HOA to maintain all catch basins, collectors, v -ditches or any other related flood control or storm water control device. 135. Developer to design a multi -family recycling plan through the City and CR&.R. 136. Developer to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 137. Developer to meet City curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. 138. Secondary access needs to be clearly defined as part of the development. 139. All existing palms (California Fan Palms and Canary Island Date Palms) to be incorporated into the project landscaping or donated to the City and relocated at the developer's expense. LAKE ELSINORE UNI UD SCHOOL DISTRICT I40. Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer small be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the District. RATERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 141. The applicant shall work with Riverside County Transit Agency staff for bus turnout. The: applicant: shall install bus turnout along Riverside Drive and along Grand Avenue as required by Riverside Transit Agency. Agenda Ilam No — Page 38 or s3 Appendix F Updated Noise Study, February 25, 2015 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Giroux & Associates 1800 E Garry St., 4205 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared for: Paradigm Engineering Group Attn: Peter M. Olah 427 E. 17th Street #4261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Date: February 25, 2015 ProicctNo.: P15 -002N NOISE SETTING Sound is mechanical energy transmitted by pressure waves in a compressible medium such as air. Noise is generally considered to be unwanted sound. Sound is characterized by various parameters that describe the rate of oscillation of sound waves, the distance between successive troughs or crests, the speed of propagation, and the pressure level or energy content ofa given sound. In particular, the sound pressure level has become the most common descriptor used to characterize the loudness ofan ambient sound level. The decibel (dB) scale is used to quantify sound pressure levels. Although decibels are most commonly associated with sound, "dB" is a gencric descriptor that is equal to ten times the logarithmic ratio of any physical parameter versus some reference quantity. For sound, the reference level is the faintest sound detectable by a young person with good auditory acuity. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire auditory spectrum, human response is factored into sound descriptions by weighting sounds within the range of maxinu1111 human sensitivity more heavily in a process called "A -weighting," written as dB(A). Any further reference in this discussion to decibels written as "M' should be understood to be A -weighted. Time variations in noise exposure are typically expressed in terms of steady-state energy level equal to the energy content ofthe time varying period (called LEQ), or alternately, as a statistical description of the sound pressure level that is exceeded over some fraction of given observation period. Finally, because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, state law requires that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Ldn (day - night) or the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The CNEL metric has gradually replaced the Ldn factor, but the two descriptors are essentially identical. CNEL-based standards are generally applied to transportation -related sources because local jurisdictions are pre-empted from exercising direct noise control over vehicles on public streets, aircraft, trains, etc. The City of Lake Elsinore therefore regulates the traffic noise exposure of the receiving property through land use controls. Noise/land use compatibility standards for various classes of land uses are generally expressed in the Noise Element of the General Plan to insure that noise exposure is considered in any development decisions. The City of Lake Elsinore has guidelines for noise exposure standards which are shown in "liable I. However, in order to reduce the potential ambiguity of conditional acceptability, Lake Elsinore developed a more clear-cut matrix of acceptable noise levels summarized in Table 2. PI 5-00' N Noise Table 1 City of Lake Elsinore Land Use Compatibility Matrix Interpretation: Zone A: Clearly Compatible Zone B: Normally Compatible Zone 0 Normally Incompatible Zone D: Cleanly Incompatible P15-002 N Noise Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. New construction or development should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh airsupply systems or air conditioning, will normally suffice. New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design, New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Conununity Noise Equivalent Level Land Use Categories dBA CNEL Categories Uses RESIDENTIAL Single Family, Duplex, Multiple Family A A A A B B B C C C D D RESIDENTIAL Mobile Home D D COMMERCIAL Hotel, Motel, Transient Lodging A A B B C Regional, District C D COMMERCIAL Commercial Retail, Bank, Restaurant, Regional, Village Movie Theatre A A A A B B C District, Special COMMERCIAL, Office Building, Research and INDUSTRIAL Development, Professional Offices, City A A A B B C D INSTITUTIONAL Office Building COMMERCIAL. Recreation Ann phitheater, Concert Hall INSTITUTIONAL B B C C D D D Civic Center Auditm'ium, Meeting Hall COMMERCIAL Children's Amusement Parlt, Miniature Recreation Golf Course, Go-cart Track, Equestrian A A A B B D D Center, Sports Club COMMERCIAL Automobile Service Station, Auto General„Special Dealership, Manufacturing, Warehousing, A A A A B INDUSTRIAL, Wholesale, Utilities B B INSTITUTIONAL INSTITu•rIONAL Hospital, Church, Library, Schools General Classroom A A B C C D D OPEN SPACE Parks A A A B C D D OPEN SPACE Golf Course, Cerneteries, Nature Centers Wildlife Reserves, Wildlife Habitat A A A A B C C AGRICULTURE Agriculture A A A A A I A A Interpretation: Zone A: Clearly Compatible Zone B: Normally Compatible Zone 0 Normally Incompatible Zone D: Cleanly Incompatible P15-002 N Noise Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. New construction or development should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh airsupply systems or air conditioning, will normally suffice. New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design, New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Table 2 Interior and Exterior Noise Standards Ldn/CNEL Category Uses Noise Level Ldn Interior Exterior Residential Single Family, Duplex, Multi Family 45 60 _ Mobile Homes 60 Commercial, Hotel, Motel, Transient Lodging 45 _ Institutional Hospital, School Classrooms 45 Church, Library 45 For new residential uses, Lake Elsinore recommends an exterior noise level of up to 60 dB Ldn/CNEL and an interior noise level of45 dB Ldn/CNEL. The exterior level applies to outdoor recreational uses such as back yards, patios, balconies and decks, etc. However, noise levels of up to 70 dB Ldn/CNEL are permissible after a detailed analysis of noise reduction features is made. Although noise levels up to 70 dB CNEL/Ldn are considered "normally compatible" with residential uses, levels exceeding 65 dB CNEL/Ldn are typically found to be intrusive into normal conservation. The General Plan Program EIR (201 1) thus states that: "residential uses are generally incompatible within the 65 dB Ldn contour" (page 3.5-44, 201 1) For residential uses, 60 dB Ldn is thus the preferred noise exposure for usable outdoor space. If ambient noise levels preclude achieving the 60 dB Ldn target, any inability to mitigate levels below 65 dB Ldn using reasonably available control measures would be considered a significant impact. The interior noise standard of 45 dB CNEL applies to habitable rooms. Typical noise attenuation with closed, double -paned windows in modern fi•ame and stucco construction is about 25-30 dB. Noise attenuation with partially open windows is 10-15 dB Ldn/CNEL. Interior standards can therefore be readily met without any "extra" mitigation if exterior levels are 55-60 dB Ldn/CNEL with open windows. With closed dual -paned windows, exterior levels of 70-75 dB Ldn/CNEL can be accommodated while still meeting interior standards. A requirement to close windows to shut out traffic noise necessitates the provision of supplemcntal ventilation with some percentage of fresh make-up air. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE NOISE STANDARDS The City Noise Ordinance of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code is designed to protect people from non -transportation (stationary) noise. The Noise Ordinance sets limits on the level and the duration of time a stationary noise source may impact an adjoining residential use. These standards recognize the varying noise sensitivity of both transmitting and receiving land uses. The property line noise perfibrinance standards are normally structured according to land use and time -of -day. 1115-002 N Noise Ordinance limits generally apply to "stationary" sources such as mechanical equipment, or vehicles operating on private property. The City's noise ordinance limits are stated in terms of a 30 -minute limit with allowable deviations from this 50`x' percentile standard. The louder the level becomes, the shorter the time becomes that it is allowed to occur. Table 3 lists the property line noise limits and the maximum cumulative period of time that the noise level may occur during a 1 -hour period. There are existing residences in multiple directions from anticipated project construction activities where the above standards would apply. Many of the existing residences are located close to arterial roadways where traffic noise would mask most construction equipment noise. The Ground Oak's Apartments northwest of the project site away from Grand Avenue with second story views of the construction area are likely the most potentially affected by temporary equipment noise. BASELINE NOISE LEVELS The project area is currently an undeveloped parcel and is surrounded by other residential uses and a high school. Traffic on SR -74 and Grand Avenue, are the most significant contributors to area wide noise levels, and are adjacent to the project site. Existing noise levels in the project area were derived from traffic volumes provided in the project traffic report. This study found the following traffic volumes and corresponding noise levels: Roadway Segment Existing Traffic Existing Noise Levels Volumes (at 50 feet from (vehicles per da centerline Riverside Dr/ Stadium -Grand 14,100 69.3 d13 CNEL Grand Ave/ N of Riverside 6,100 64.5 dl3 CNEL With the existing noise levels exceeding compatibility thresholds it is likely that area build out conditions will provide for even less favorable traffic noise levels. Therefore, it is likely that noise mitigation for the project residential uses will require evaluation depending on project setback. Po -002 N Noise 6 Table 3 Municipal Code Exterior Noise Limits [Ord. 772 § 17.78.060, 1986. Code 1987 § 17.78.060]. 17.176.100 Special provisions— Exemptions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this noise standards: • Regularly scheduled school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., provided a special events permit is also required for hand activities on City streets. Regularly scheduled activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds. However, the use of public address or amplified music systems is not permitted to exceed the exterior noise standard of adjacent property at the property line. P[5-002 N Noise Noise level that may not be exceeded for more RECEIVING LAND USE TIME than a cumulative period of: 30 is 5 1 ANYTIME MIN/HR MIN/HR MIN/HR MIN/HR Single -Family Residential 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 40 45 50 55 60 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. 50 55 60 65 70 Multiple Dwelling 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 45 50 65 70 65 Residential 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. 50 55 60 65 70 Pudic Space Office 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. 60 65 70 75 80 General Commercial 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 60 65 70 75 80 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 Light Industrial Anytime 70 75 80 85 90 Heavy Industrial Anytime 75 80 85 90 95 [Ord. 772 § 17.78.060, 1986. Code 1987 § 17.78.060]. 17.176.100 Special provisions— Exemptions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this noise standards: • Regularly scheduled school bands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., provided a special events permit is also required for hand activities on City streets. Regularly scheduled activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds. However, the use of public address or amplified music systems is not permitted to exceed the exterior noise standard of adjacent property at the property line. P[5-002 N Noise NOISE IMPACTS Two characteristic noise sources are typically identified with land use intensification such as that proposed for The Village at Lakeshore residential project. Initially, construction activities, especially heavy equipment, will create short-term noise increases near the project site. Upon completion, project -related traffic will cause an incremental increase in area -wide noise levels throughout the Lake Elsinore area. Traffic noise impacts are typically analyzed both to insure that a project will not adversely impact the acoustic environment of the surrounding community, as well as to insure that the project site is not exposed to an unacceptable level of noise resulting from the ambient noise environment acting upon the project. Because the area is already largely developed, it is unlikely that development of 163 residential condominiums will trigger any significance thresholds. Rather, because of proximity to highly traveled roadways, site suitability due to ambient noise levels is more likely to be of concern. STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE CEQA Guidelines identify significant impacts as those that cause standards to be exceeded when the standards are currently met. Impacts are also considered significant if they "substantially" worsen an existing unacceptable noise environment. "Substantially" is not defined in any guidelines. The accuracy of sound level meters and of sound propagation computer models is no better than fl dB. This is also below the human loudness difference discrimination level even under ideal laboratory conditions. Most people cannot distinguish a change in the noise environment that differs by less than 3 dB between the pre- and past -project exposure if the change occurs under ambient conditions. For the purposes of this analysis, an increase of +3 dB which creates or worsens an area of noise/land use incompatibility would be considered a significant degradation of noise quality. Because of the logarithmic relationship between traffic volumes and noise levels, it requires a dramatic increase in traffic to create even a perceptible change in noise levels. A -1-1 dB increase requires a 25 percent greater traffic volume. A +3 dB noise increase occurs when volumes double. In those areas where traffic levels are already high enough to create a noise concern, few projects would individually cause traffic volumes to double. Off-site traffic noise impacts tend therefore to be more ofa cumulative, rather than an individual impact. Construction noise is typically governed by ordinance limits on allowable times of equipment operations. CEQA Appendix G guidelines state that if an impact is regulated by a rule or regulation specifically designed to control a given type of impact (such as construction noise), then compliance with that rule may be used in support ofa finding that the impact is less -than - significant. Construction noise impacts therefore will be less -Chan -significant if tliey comply with the applicable ordinance limits. The Lake Elsinore Municipal Code restricts and regulates hours of construction operation and levels of construction noise. In Chapter 17.78, Section 17.78.080 (F), construction noise is restricted fi-om 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. weekdays and at any time on Sundays or holidays, when it creates a noise disturbance across a residential or 1,15-002 N Noise 8 commercial property line. Section 17.78.080 (F) (2) regulates construction activity noise levels as follows: B. Noise Restrictions at Affected Structures. When technically and economically feasible, the contractor shall conduct construction activities in such a manner that the maximum noise levels at the affected buildings will not exceed those levels listed in the following schedule: 1. At Residential Structm'es. a. Mobile Equipment. Maximum noise levels for non-scheduled, intermittent, and short-term operation (less than 10 days) of mobile equipment: b. Stationary Equipment Maximum noise level for repetitively scheduled and relatively long-term operation (period of 10 days or more) of stationary equipment: Single-family Multi -family Semi -residential/ Daily, except Sundays and Residential Residential Commercial legal holidays, 7:00 a.m. to (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Daily, except Sundays and 60 65 70 legal holidays, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 75 80 85 Daily, 8:00 p.m. to 50 55 60 7:00 a.m. and all day Sunday and legal holidays. 60 65 70 b. Stationary Equipment Maximum noise level for repetitively scheduled and relatively long-term operation (period of 10 days or more) of stationary equipment: PI 5-002 N Noise 11 Single-family Residential (dBA) Multi -family Residential (dBA) Semi -residential/ Commercial (dBA) Daily, except Sundays and legal holidays, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 60 65 70 Daily, 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and all day Sunday and legal holidays. 50 55 60 PI 5-002 N Noise 11 2. At Business Structures. a. Mobile equipment. Maximum noise levels for non-scheduled, intermittent, short-term operation of mobile equipment: Daily, including Sunday and legal holidays, all hours: maximum of 85 dBA. CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS Temporary construction noise impacts vary markedly because the noise strength of construction equipment ranges widely as a function of the equipment used and its activity level. Short-term construction noise impacts tend to occur in discrete phases dominated initially by earth -moving sources, then by foundation and parking area construction, and finally for finish construction. Figure 1 shows the typical range of construction activity noise generation as a function of equipment used in various building phases. Because of the limited earthworks on this relatively flat site, there will be limited use of heavy grading equipment. The earth -moving sources are seen to be the noisiest with equipment noise ranging up to about 90 dB(A) at 50 feet from the source. The noise ordinance standard for mobile equipment to be used during grading is 75 dBA at the nearest residence. There is no feasible alternative equipment that can move earth in economical quantity without creating peals noise levels near 90 dBA. Spherically radiating point sources of noise emissions are atmospherically attenuated by a factor of 6 dB per doubling of distance, or about 20 dB in 500 feet of propagation. The loudest earth -moving noise sources will therefore sometimes be detectable above the local background beyond 1,000 feet from the construction area. An impact radius of 1,000 feet or more pre- supposes a clear line -of -sight and no other machinery or equipment noise that would mask project construction noise. With buildings and other barriers to interrupt line -of -sight conditions, the potential "noise envelope" around individual construction sites is reduced. Construction noise impacts are, therefore, somewhat less than that predicted under idealized input conditions. However, because of distance separation to the site, construction noise impacts are likely to provide a temporary annoyance for site adjacent sensitive receptors since the closest residences to the northwest are approximately 50 feet fronn the closest project boundary. Construction noise impacts may temporarily exceed the City of Lake Elsinore construction noise standards. Because of the small construction site, noise mitigation through berms or temporary noise walls is not considered feasible. Shot -term construction activity noise generation impacts are considered temporarily potentially significant. Equipment noise is generated during the daytime when adjacent residents are normally at work, in school, or otherwise away from their residences. Thus, although the threshold levels in Section 17.78.080 of the municipal code may be occasionally exceeded, that impact is considered less -than -significant. P] 5 -00'N Nan,, p Figure l Typical Construction Equipment Noise Generation Levels Noise Level (dBA) at 50 Feet 708 ._.._._90 _ 100 -__-- Compactors (Rollers) r.r Front Loaders Backhoes Tractors w s _ t � ur Scrapers. Graders — — Pavers `�°- Trucks �r� m_. _ ..... ........------------- --- ----. --+------- ---- rn Concrete Mixers I a 3 i Concrete Pumps Cranes (Movable) aGim -- -------- -�---—.........___-__. E Cranes (Derrick) w Pumps m o Generators is..._...- ----—...._....._ Compressors Pneumatic Wrenches ri Jack Hammers and Rock Drills u' Pile Drivers (Peaks) d Vibrator 0 Saws awfw PIA P82u,,7I[5-ov.mnmmtolhofacS^�Apenry,Oecantu31,1911, from Gonslmwsn Egnpmvntrod QKfl ens" P 5-002 N Noise CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY VIBRATION Construction activities generate ground -borne vibration when heavy equipment travels over unpaved surfaces or when it is engaged in soil movement. The effects of ground -borne vibration include discernable movement of building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on shelves or hanging on walls, and rumbling sounds. Within the "soft" sedimentary surfaces of much of Southern California, ground vibration is quickly damped out. Because vibration is typically not an issue, very few jurisdictions have adopted vibration significance thresholds. Vibration thresholds have been adopted for major public works construction projects, but these relate mostly to structural protection (cracking foundations or stucco) rather than to human annoyance. Vibration is most commonly expressed in terms of the root mean square (RMS) velocity of a vibrating object. RMS velocities are expressed in units of vibration decibels. The range of vibration decibels (VdB) is as follows: 65 VdB - threshold of human perception 72 VdB - annoyance due to frequent events 80 VdB - annoyance due to infi-equent events 100 VdB - minor cosmetic damage To determine potential impacts of the project's construction activities, estimates of vibration levels induced by the construction equipment at various distances are presented below: kr 1 r r rausn rNoise & v iuration Assessment, Chapter 12, (- onstruction, 1995) The on-site construction equipment that will create the maximum potential vibration is a large bulldozer. The stated vibration source level in the FTA Handbook for such equipment is 87 VdB at 25 feet from the source. By 50 feet the vibration level dissipates to 81 VdB. Large bulldozers will not likely operate directly at the shared property line with the perimeter homes. Any fine grading at the property line should be performed with small bulldozers which are seen above to have 30 VdB less vibration potential, Therefore, to ensure adequate vibration annoyance protection the following mitigation measure is recommended: Only small bulldozers shall be permitted to operate within 56 feet of the nearest residential structures. Construction activity vibration impacts are judged as less -than -significant. PI5-002N Noise �y A n•oximate Vibration Levels (VdB)* E ui ment 25 feet SU feet 100 feet 200 feet Large Bulldozer 87 81 75 69 Loaded Truck 86 80 74 68 Jackhammer 79 73 67 61 Small Bulldozer 58 52 46 40 kr 1 r r rausn rNoise & v iuration Assessment, Chapter 12, (- onstruction, 1995) The on-site construction equipment that will create the maximum potential vibration is a large bulldozer. The stated vibration source level in the FTA Handbook for such equipment is 87 VdB at 25 feet from the source. By 50 feet the vibration level dissipates to 81 VdB. Large bulldozers will not likely operate directly at the shared property line with the perimeter homes. Any fine grading at the property line should be performed with small bulldozers which are seen above to have 30 VdB less vibration potential, Therefore, to ensure adequate vibration annoyance protection the following mitigation measure is recommended: Only small bulldozers shall be permitted to operate within 56 feet of the nearest residential structures. Construction activity vibration impacts are judged as less -than -significant. PI5-002N Noise �y PROJECT -RELATED VEHICULAR NOISE IMPACTS Long-term noise concerns from the increase of residential uses at the project site center primarily on vehicular operations on project area roadways. These concerns were addressed using the California specific vehicle noise curves (CALVENO) in the federal roadway noise model (the E13WA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA-RD-77-108). This model calculates the Lcq noise level for a particular reference set of input conditions, and then makes a series of adjustments for site-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds, or noise barriers. Table 4 summarizes the 24-hour CNEL level at 50 feet from the roadway centerline along area roadway segments using data provided in the project traffic report. As shown in Table 4, the maxinnnn project impact is +0.3 dB CNEL at 50 feet fi•otn centerline on Riverside Drive between Stadium Way and Grand Avenue. This impact is much less than the +3.0 dB significance threshold. Traffic volumes on area roadways are already large such that any project related contribution is greatly diluted. Project related traffic noise impacts are considered to be less -than -significant. Table 4 The Village at Lakeshore Traffic Noise Lnpact Analysis (dBA CNEL at 50 feet from centerline) Segment Existing Existing + Project Build -Out Build -Out + Project Riverside Dr/ E of Lakeshore Dr 68.5 68.6 71.8 71.9 Lakeshore -Lincoln 69.3 69.5 7L9 72.0 Lincoln -Stadium 68.5 68.7 71.2 71.3 Stadium -Grand 68.1 68.4 70.8 71.0 Grand Ave/ N of Machado 62.4 62.5 66.3 66.4 Machado -Riverside Dr 64.5 64.6 67.2 67.3 Riverside Dr -Macy St 68.5 68.6 70.6 70.7 S of Macy St 68.5 68.5 70.6 70.6 Macy St/ E of Grand 57.0 57.0 70-6 70.6 W of Grand 58.6 58.6 59.4 59.4 Lincoln St/ Machado -Riverside Dr 65.0 65.0 66.7 66.7 N Lakeshore Dr/ N of Riverside Dr 683 68.4 69.6 69.7 S of Riverside Dr 67.9 1 67.9 69.7 69.7 ON SITE NOISE EXPOSURE Roadway Noise The project site is primarily exposed to noise from adjacent roadways. As shown in Table 4. along the Grand Avenue frontage, calculated noise levels are expected to reach 67 dB CNEL at PIS -002 N Noisc 13 50 feet from roadway centcrline at area build -out. The closest planned on site building fagade is approximately 80 feet from the Grand Avenue centerline. Useable outdoor space on the ground level would be considered to have a 70 toot centerline setback distance. Build -out noise levels along Riverside Drive in the project vicinity are expected to reach 71 dB CNEL at 50 feet from centerline. The closest on site fayade and recreational use for Riverside Drive is similar to those along the Grand Avenue frontage. Therefore, the following noise loadings are anticipated corder build out conditions at the indicated setback distances: Distance from C/L to Noise Level for Distance from Noise Loading at Ground Story Recreational C/L to Building Facade Recreational Use User Facade Grand Avenue 70 feet 65.5 dB 80 feet 65 dB Riverside Drive 70 feet 69.5 dB 80 feet 69 dB Mitigation to meet a 60 dB CNEL Conjatibilit _ Threshold Patios or decks with a line of sight to Grand Avenue will require 5.5 dB of noise attenuation to meet the recommended exterior compatibility threshold of 60 dB CNEL. The planned 6 -foot perimeter wall would provide at least -6 dB of noise attenuation and reduce noise at any ground story yard to Tess than 60 dB CNEL. The perimeter wall will not assist in noise mitigation for possible upper level balconies or decks fi-onting Grand Avenue. It is recommended that any balconies or decks with a line -of -sight to Grand Avenue be equipped with a 6 -foot transparent wall or glass/plastic shield (or combination) enclosure that would permit view while mitigating noise. Again, such an enclosure would provide at least -6 dB of noise attenuation and reduce noise on any patio with a direct view of Grand Avenue to below 60 dB CNEL. Because traffic noise along the Riverside Drive frontage is higher, a noise wall would need to be 9 feet high to mitigate noise to below 60 dB CNEL. It would not be possible to mitigate noise at upper level balconies or decks with a line of sight to Riverside Drive to below 60 dB. However recreational uses at the project may be considered to be common outdoor- space located in the interior of the complex. The ground level pool and recreational area can be considered common use space. This area is noise protected by the perimeter residential units such that noise levels are expected to be within the 60 dBA CNEL limit. Most jurisdictions do not require noise protection fm - individual recreational space if noise -protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. "I -herefore, the following mitigation measure is recommended to meet a 60 dB CNEL exterior noise threshold: • Consider interior common outdoor space, which is shielded by buildings from roadway noise and is therefore below the 60 dBA CNEL threshold, to adequately provide outdoor open space for residents without the need for noise -protected patios or decks. Most P6-002 N N,)uw 14 jurisdictions do not require noise protection for individual recreational space if noise - protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. Should the City of Lake Elsinore make this same determination for this project no mitigation perimeter would be required. Mitigation to meet a 65 dB CNEL Compatibility Threshold The planned 6 -foot perimeter wall would reduce any project ground story residential use noise to below a 65 dB CNEL threshold. However, along the Riverside Drive frontage a 5- foot enclosure would be required for any upper level balcony or deck with a line ofsight to the roadway. Along the Grand Avenue frontage no mitigation would be required for upper level patios or decks. Interior Noise The interior residential noise standard is 45 dB CNEL. For typical wood -framed construction with stucco and gypsum board wall assemblies, the exterior to interior noise level reduction is as follows: Partly open windows — 12 dB Closed single -paned windows — 20 dB Closed dual -paned windows — 30 dB Use of dual -paned windows is required by the Calitornia Building Code (CBC) for energy conservation in new residential construction. Interior standards will be met as long as residents with a line of -sight to Grand Avenue or Riverside Drive have the option to close their windows. Where window closure is needed to shut out noise, supplemental ventilation is required by the CBC with some specified percentage of fresh make-up air. Central air conditioning with a fresh air inlet would meet this requirement. Hiah School Noise Activities from the Athletic Field/Stadium of the Lakeside High School is located north of the project sit. The Stadium has a seating capacity of4,200 to 4,300 people. As noted earlier, the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code exempts public schools from compliance with noise standards as follows: Regularly scheduled school hands, school athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., provided a special events permit is also required for hand activities on City streets. Regularly scheduled activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds. However, the use ofpublic address or amplified music systems PI i-001 N Noise 15 is not permitted to exceed the exterior noise standard of adjacent property at the property line. Nevertheless, the potential noise activities generated on the high school ground have been examined. The two dominant noise sources associated with the Stadium are crowd noise and the public address system. The nearest spectator seating area to the project site is located approximately 500 feet away and faces away ti-om the project. The other seating area is approximately 700 feet away fi-om the project. Sound from the PA system is usually directed towards the spectator seating area. The project is not immediately adjacent to the Stadium mr spectator area. On December 1, 2006, we monitored noise levels in four back yards that back up to the LaSalle High School athletic field in Pasadena where a CIF play-off football game was played. Digital sound level meters were placed on back patios of four adjacent homes and run from 4 p.m. (for background monitoring until game time) until 11 p.m. Meters were calibrated before and after the measurements. The measurements were compared against the City of Pasadena noise ordinance standards which limit noise levels from one property crossing an adjacent property. Between the hours of 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., the noise ordinance standard was exceeded by a wide margin. These homes were somewhat closer to the stadium than the proposed project condominiums. Ilowever, the degree of excess noise was such that a temporary noise nuisance may occur at project homes closest to the Lakeside High School football field. The stadium is used for a variety of events, often with the P.A. system active, but only football combines maximum attendance with exuberant use of the P.A. system. This typically happens on five evenings per year unless Lakeside High advances into season -end play offs which is infrequent. As noted above, the sound system is not permitted to exceed noise ordinance standards even though other activities on school grounds are exempt from these standards. The infrequency of major stadium events and noise ordinance limits on the P.A. system support the finding that school proximity is a less -than -significant noise constraint. Because some school activity noise will inevitably be occasionally audible, full disclosure of the school and stadium presence should be included in any real estate transfer or lease documents. 1'I 5-003 N Mise 16 MITIGATION Short-term construction noise intrusion shall be mitigated by compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore Noise Ordinance. The allowed howl of construction are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. Because of the distance between the project and adjacent residential receivers, construction may be noisier than prescribed limits on occasion but are minimized by the following conditions: All equipment shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. • Equipment and materials shall be staged in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. • All construction -related activities shall be restricted to the construction howl outlined in the City's Noise Ordinance. • Haul truck and other construction -related trucks traveling to and ft•om the project site shall be restricted to the same hours specified for the operation of construction equipment. To the extent feasible, haul routes shall not pass directly by sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Vibration levels from heavy equipment may be noticeable at times at the nearest sensitive use to the west and south of the project site, but will not cause any structural damage or exceed the vibration damage threshold. Nevertheless, to ensure adequate vibration protection the following mitigation measure is recommended: • Only small bulldozers shall be permitted to operate within 56 feet of the nearest residences. Project -related off-site traffic noise changes on existing streets are less than significant It is recommended that the City consider common outdoor space, which is shielded by buildings from roadway noise, to adequately provide recreational use space for residents without the need for noise -protected patios or decks to comply with a 60 dBA CNEL threshold. Most jurisdictions do not require noise protection for individual recreational space if noise -protected common space is provided, which is the case with this project. Should the City of Lake Elsinore make this same determination for the project, no mitigation for roadway noise at would be required. To meet a 60 dB CNEL exterior noise threshold the 6 -'foot noise wall would provide adequate noise protection for ground level uses along Grand Ave. However, shielding would be required for upper level patios or decks. To meet the 60 dB CNEL exterior threshold for uses along the Riverside Drive perimeter, a 9 -foot wall would be required. However, it would not be possible to adequately shield upper level patios or decks to comply to within 60 dB CNFI.. PIS -002 N Nmsc 17 The planned 6 -foot perimeter noise wall would mitigate noise exposure for ground level uses at all units if a 65 dB CNFL threshold be considered as the compatibility guideline. Only upper level patios or decks along the Riverside Drive fi-ontage would require shielding in the form of glass or plexi -glass enclosures in addition to the 6 -foot noise wall. Residential habitable rooms facing Riverside Drive or Grand Avenue will meet the City of Lake Elsinore 45 MA CNEL interior noise standard with no acoustical mitigation except the provision of supplemental ventilation for rooms where window closure is needed at rates specified in the California Building Code. Real estate disclosure documents should note the presence of the adjacent high school and stadium. Football games, band practice, the Special Olympics and other noise generation may be audible at the proposed project site. Full initial disclosure will minimize possible later noise nuisance complaints. PI 5-002 N Nmw 18 Appendix G Updated Traffic Study, July 28, 2014 VAX'> COW iXIN6 March 31, 2015 Mr. Pete Olah Paradigm Engineering Group 427 E. 17'h Street No. 261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear Mr. Olah: VA Consulting, Inc. (VA) has completed the following addendum to the "Revised Traffic Impact Study Report, The Village at Lake Shore Specific Plan, Parcel Map 33267, City of Lake Elsinore," dated October 12, 2005, prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates. This updated addendum analysis is based on an increase in the number of proposed multifamily dwelling units from 146 to 163 and new traffic volume data collected in February 2015. This analysis concludes that with the original project recommendations, the proposed increase in dwelling units and current traffic volumes will result in no significant circulation impacts as compared to the previous study and the original project findings and mitigation measures remain valid. This addendum analysis is consistent with all assumptions and methodologies of the previous study with the exception of the identified increase in the number of project dwelling units, the use of current 2015 traffic volume data, and new information on other development projects located within the project study area. The relevant findings of our analysis are discussed in more detail below. Project Trip Generation The original and revised project trip generation based on 146 and 163 multifamily dwelling units, respectively, is shown in Table 4-2 below (former Webb table and figure numbers have been retained for ease of reference). The traffic generation of the proposed 163 dwelling units is based on the latest trip generation rates identified in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Table 4-2 PM 33267 Former and Proposed Project Trip Generation ITE Land Use 231 Unit Quant. Am Peak Hour Pm Peak our Total In Out Total In Out Daily Low -Rise Condominium DU 146 98 25 74 115 66 49 1,274 Low -Rise Condominium — DU 163 109 28 82 127 73 54 1,413 Increase DU 17 11 _. 3 8 12 7 5 139 Table 4-2 shows that the addition of 17 dwelling units increases the daily site trip generation by 139 vehicle trips. During the am peak hour the total number of trips increases by 11 trips with 3 inbound and 8 outbound and during the pm peak hour the total number of trips increases by 12 with 7 inbound and 5 outbound. X:\Projects\1122_0103\Eng\TectiDocs\Reports\REP03-Traffic STudy\Revised Addendum Stud y\14_072414 Traffic Ltr Rpt_dk.doc — covsccri�,ee Traffic Analysis To determine if any significant impacts as compared to the previous study result from current 2015 traffic volumes and the identified additional forecast project traffic volumes, intersection level of service (LOS) analysis was performed for each study area intersection included in the previous report. This analysis was performed using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Existing Conditions Table 3-4 PM 33267 Level of Service Analysis Existing Study Area Intersection Conditions Study Area Intersection Control 2005 2015 AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Delay LOS (secs) Delay LOS (sees) Delay secs _ Los Delay (sees) LOS 1. Machado St./Grand Avenue All -way Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 9.2 A 8.2 A 2. Riverside Dr./Grand Avenue 1 -way Stop 12.4 B 12,0 B 11.7 B 10.9 B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside or (SR -74) 1 -way Stop OVRFL F OVRFL F OVRFL F OVRFL F 4. Macy St./ rand Avenue 2 -way Slop 16.4 c 30.5 D 57.3 F 48.0 E 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 33.8 c 28.4 c 36.2 D 19.7 B 6. Riverside DrAIV. Lakeshore Dr. Signalized 33.4 c 37.0 D 25,0 C 28.1 C 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized na no no na 16.0 B 4.8 A 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signalized no no na na 19.3 B 5.8 A Table 3-4 shows that existing intersection level of service (LOS) has generally remained stable over the past 10 years between 2005 and 2015. The only intersection that has experienced a change in LOS by more than two service levels is Macy Street at Grand Avenue. LOS at all other comparable locations has either remained unchanged or improved in at least one peak hour. Six of eight study area intersections have an LOS of D or better during both peak hours under existing traffic conditions. Proposed Project Conditions Two scenarios were included in the original report for analysis of future with project traffic conditions with recommended offsite mitigation measures: 1. Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Conditions; and 2. Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project Conditions. Table 5-2 shows the results of LOS analysis for the development of the project with an additional 17 low rise condominium units for a total of 163 units under the Existing (2015) plus Ambient Growth plus Project scenario. The project opening year is anticipated to be 2017 so existing 2015 volumes have been grown 2% per year for two years. X:\Projects\1122_0103\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\REP03-Traffic STudy\Revised Addendum Study\14_072414_Traffic Ltr Rpt_dk.doc Table 5-2 shows that based on existing 2015 volumes this scenario is anticipated to result in intersection LOS equal to or higher than that predicted in the original Webb study. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are required to accommodate the increased number of dwelling units or an increase in background traffic. Table 5-2 Revised Study Area Intersection Level of Service Analysis Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions (with Improvements) Study Area Intersection -------_---. Control 2005 2005 2015 Hr APM Peak Hr M Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Delay LOS Delay secs secs LOS Delay LOS secs Delay secs LOS 1. Machado SL/Grand Avenue _ All -way Stop 10.7 B 10.4 B 9.4 A 9.5 A 10.2 B 2. Riverside Dr./Grand Avenue 1 -way Stop 14.0 B 13.2 B 12.6 B B 11.4 B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside Dr (SR -74) Signalized' 24.9 C 24.0 C 21.3 C Signalized' 19.6 B 4. Macy St./Grand Avenue Signalized' 4.8 A 5.1 A 4.1 A C 5.8 A 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 47.9 D 42.4 D 38.7 D D 21.9 C 6. Riverside Dr.NV. Lakeshore Dr. Signalized 36.4 D 41.6D 5.7 25.4 C 29.4FA 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized na na na na 15.9 B 4.78. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signalized na na na na 18.9B 5.6 wnwuuucu nu/eu unpiuvernenc; 2Signalization of this intersection is not a condition of Project approval and is included for consistency with previous Webb study. Table 5-4 shows the results of LOS analysis for the development of the project with an additional 17 low rise condominium units for a total of 163 units under the Cumulative plus Ambient Growth plus Project scenario. Table 5-4 Revised Study Area Intersection Level of Service Analysis Cumulative Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Conditions (with Improvements) Study Area Intersection ._ Control 2005 2015 AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Delay secs Los Delay secssecssecs Los Delay Los Delay Los 1. Machado St./Grand Avenue All -way Stop 14.3 B 28.1 D 9.5 A 10.4 _ B 2. Riverside Dr./Grand Avenue 1 -way Stop 21.8 C 25.3 D 12.8 8 11.4 B 3. Grand Ave./Riverside Dr.(SR-74) Signalized' 32.8 C 46.5 D 21.1 C 19.5 B 4. Macy SL/Grand Avenue Signalized' 0.0 A 27.0 C 4,5 A Z5 A 5. Riverside Drive/Lincoln Street Signalized 32.2 C 28.1 C 47.0 D 24.7 C 6. Riverside Dr.NV. Lakeshore or Signalized 29.0 C 44.4 D 26.7 C 7. Riverside Drive/School Entrance Signalized 8.4 A 5.7 A 15.5 B ]14.5 UA 8. Riverside Drive/Stadium Way Signalized 81 A 8.0 A 18.1 B COra dl0ned Pro)ect Improvement; 2Signalization of this intersection is not a condition of Project approval and is included for consistency with previous Webb study. X',\Projects\1122_0103\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\REP03-Traffic STudy\Revised Add shoo in Study\14_072414 Traffic Ltr Rpt_dk.doc Table 5-4 shows that based on existing 2015 volumes this scenario is anticipated to result in intersection LOS generally equal to or higher than that predicted in the original Webb study. In the few instances where this is not the case, the resulting LOS is still D or better. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are required to accommodate the increased number of dwelling units or an increase in background traffic. Conclusions Based on the above analysis of an increase of 17 dwelling units to result in a total site development of 163 low rise condominiums, current new traffic data counts within the study area, and an update of traffic forecasts associated with other on-going development projects, the potential for significant project -related circulation network impacts as a result of the additional dwelling units is considered negligible. Updated tables and figures are attached to this analysis identified by the original Webb study numbers for ease of reference. New traffic volume data counts and HCM LOS worksheets are included in an appendix. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Should you have questions or require additional assistance, please contact me at (949) 474-1401, ext. 227. Sincerely, ��[sSrtW i Pl� dare 2%�Gr/f-C Keith R. Rutherfurd, TE * Re. TRoo1s4� o Vice President of Traffic Engineering TRAFF\� sir ry of CA�vt X:\Projects\1122_0103\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\REP03-Traffic STudy\Revised Addendum Stud y\14_072414_ Traffic Ur Rpt_dk.doc w �. CL CL O jw w °C w 3NNa 1N01 Ntll ❑ r Un0 — f- Wa v C'Cn V a Z Z a O LL __j w H 1332115 J� AOf > > w Q Q z Q J 0 CL W " Q U w z w Q W 173815 N103NII QJ > 0i w J D-' K W Y U w O (j _. ¢ O w Y w Y w Q �• ¢ W _ 137815 NOSIaVW U ¢ Q U JIr U O 0 0 0 H H ¢ a ]ANO N3MOHN7SI3 LJJ G W E ¢-W LL Y 100HOS HOIH OISDAVl Q Q J o U = H W jr F H a v) �o AVM vinIOVls SH 3NOHS3NVl ._.....— __ w •� �w'z r YN3NV ONVNO ^ m � a ' w d z w C) w N > o _ Q Q U z i' 3nlaa aoHsa>iviT Q CO CA w J CD W CDQ D CD CDz N Q w O. CD ���z o z N) w z - w o N o) ° LV ro Q O w o> z o o o 0 o cn z o Un Un cn LL IX 3sats N Aor O � z N n • •'w r X F W N ® N' ���- w 3aais MOON N a � �- 0 0 co��� LU Lj Y ` J Cl) aaaNosladw oZ°O N ad 3nlao aNOHN3sl3 0 - W U U 10MUN loolios � > J LU U 3: ~ o 1 0 0 w EY �l a � �� a dF - AV wnlavis SH 3als-�Nvl � N �WOU> 1 \ < H 2 U N n l O N 4oz ._._ ..._ \ • d. ...._._._• .. Z U � zNanv ON - N �D iJ cv N a U Ll_ LL 3Alaa a0H53hVl > J 0 M Q M uiD m LL r® < o C7 cc N W W 133a1S --� Aor Q Z H X 3a.is W NiOONII W cc >- 0) M O p N N CU W Q W 11IM's NOSiavw J U O Q IL Z 3Na0 213MOHNNI LTJ .2 J C7 W W Y _ LL 3o NVa1N "IOOHOS Q CY) LU o Uw F' W It N O W O o cy F— fJ = a d fA _ a AVM WHIOVIS SH 3210HSDVl N o N LO.-. -- CO00 0 ND N (O N �`w>Q N v wnv V U y 5 3HN3nd QNVaJ� N M L a is z o Q O w LLJ >- — (J) a C � J — O OUTO�- z> z v w.�J + �► f l J W o ]O L Y O C7 Cl- w n i Q J w �o z N o 66 M W> = J Q � z Lbly� f f a WZ O �d 0 OO LL¢v � FO -0 -o w N o C'3 LU S, ��� 1 h l l � 3niaa aoiis3�vI l99 Z W �OLI LZZ� o00 (-- w T 0 W cc } 133a1S ACP = �o w F U �8 Y LL 343 — ra, x196 �� �08� Q Q Z 33 CL 133aLS MONII �' • ZhZy� r_ w J co ►� r— 96 N Q U W ti �� f O �J- O ��N J L W i LL 131alS NOSIOVW ( > < J L-_ w H 3ANO 83MOHN]S13 1 roM I— N L U 3oNVdiN3 100HOS + —� gZ + a w r� 0 w T 1 O S6 999 ° o cv .— cv AVM Wnl VLS SII 3a0H53NV3 � s m LO �a>¢ Op – 00 w w o v OD M N � 7 ' _.._—_. m co N 3nN3nv ONVaO �, o (o� (O N a (0 a z o O w ujw N oz �w CD C mol � 27ot�,Oo Q� �w=_oiw y O QO JwJ V) —w Do wO oav N o00 0 w �� 3nmCl32JOHS3NVl f L pool w LZZ N LI} w _ > OIVo N O w Ir O } Allis A r � S -1 Q L M n W , � ��Z Y N W 235 6 £ ►-9�� I- cc OZ U O 133ais N)OONn 17 6ZZ 000 ` ¢ a Q U W O 0 J U. 133ais NosiaVw > Q J UJ CC INK aNOHNMO = F- N N� W3ONVdAl 100HO � + 0- LM � OH A W �a H M 9l j O LL Mo as CL to 'O AVM wrn Vis sH 3aoHs3AV) o � w >¢ 04 In o z N r N wa- p O--�9(W3AV (]NVNN p '° co � a 1332115 AOf / J h�� \ F U W O O YAW a CC J F- Q Z ]3Nls MOW] LO r � 1 W � w 40 Z9—►O K/ ° QV �= J W LL LL Y 133N1S NOSICIVw W CC J = h 3NIN0 213MOHN3Sl3 O � D�� V 30NVaN3 'SH m g�° o W m p(SI O W )1 1 "i iK atA M b ow ¢AVM Vgnl V1S SIH 3NOFIS3NV3�w In � O r v b p 00 - -- M 00 ^oz N m w�- 3l1N3AV ONVNO T r a ° $04r z K iJ n_ ap z z o < o w 0o a LLJ O Q wLd o z Z Qom LLJ zoo W uj w Er D �0 J LLJ w o z LLJ N z Lon Qn c— LU CC O W xz c o00 co Imm H 3NOHSDT O U„ w m 1332115 AOf / J h�� \ F U W O O YAW a CC J F- Q Z ]3Nls MOW] LO r � 1 W � w 40 Z9—►O K/ ° QV �= J W LL LL Y 133N1S NOSICIVw W CC J = h 3NIN0 213MOHN3Sl3 O � D�� V 30NVaN3 'SH m g�° o W m p(SI O W )1 1 "i iK atA M b ow ¢AVM Vgnl V1S SIH 3NOFIS3NV3�w In � O r v b p 00 - -- M 00 ^oz N m w�- 3l1N3AV ONVNO T r a ° $04r z K iJ n_ ap z W 0o 8 O O J <0 _ LV uj n' Z Er D �0 �5 u" F- W LU CC O W xz 1332115 AOf / J h�� \ F U W O O YAW a CC J F- Q Z ]3Nls MOW] LO r � 1 W � w 40 Z9—►O K/ ° QV �= J W LL LL Y 133N1S NOSICIVw W CC J = h 3NIN0 213MOHN3Sl3 O � D�� V 30NVaN3 'SH m g�° o W m p(SI O W )1 1 "i iK atA M b ow ¢AVM Vgnl V1S SIH 3NOFIS3NV3�w In � O r v b p 00 - -- M 00 ^oz N m w�- 3l1N3AV ONVNO T r a ° $04r z K iJ n_ ap z i O NIOONII LO cor A]3 IS NOSIOM I 3�R10 IINI N3S13 ZO 0 LLJ < Q W y U J J J a w � z O O0 ww w W > z N o� LLJ o� W > Q �J I—o z v LLJ W o Y o W o Z N o I— J Q V7— C7 N � C • � O o (0 FO-0-01co �— i O NIOONII LO cor A]3 IS NOSIOM I O O —95 fS L (J O 0 O O N 3nNIAV CINVW coNr a > � I 'x 3�R10 IINI N3S13 `^ H O 2 � U 30NV,i s Ii J w co Y Q O O0 ww w W > M r LOi N T a U) w M � � T AVM hnl V1S 5'H 3NOHS3W '^ LO OD 00 OD C7 N � O O —95 fS L (J O 0 O O N 3nNIAV CINVW coNr a > � I 'x `^ S�LO O 2 � J M co Y Q O d� W > pp�p LL LO_ (� CLW n CCCC W F- CCZ z o CO o w W J J U LJ � � ZO J O Qom � z~ �� UO z > 3: -j z 0w �j wz a o cn f U Y o� Z6 0 �L oOo f� O w wQz N oz�w z m w W¢ cD CC > FW - I tio00 T- 09 CT p ._ .-�9�w 1 CL T O O w cr r i33ais orJ = V W ~ �j J�1L� Y W r4 1 J 133a1s MOOV ' J-� 1 CLa N � �1 f �1 T f' (D — W U Y LL i33ais NOslavw < J 2 f- 3nlaa a7MOHN3s13 F - NN � � U 3ONVUN3 'S "H - j �-� -�-� + L- a LU o 0 u AVM MAI Vis s11 3a0H$3AVl O N `� O arm LO — co znz T T r C7 ., > wa- T ]AN3nv a Q _o o uj W >- ~ J W Q W Q z J W 0 Q 0 0� Lioo z Q o z vLLJ6 �j L. W Z w o�> o �� y —9/ �O W W N �8 O o00 Oo O �- J z J d EL W z !1 f f � W w • n O �� z 000 J o Q O �j V Y �nlaa 3aoHSIWI f 9L Q 6 o00 w W > (0 O O w 1332J1S AOf � 0 �,/^1 U w V! �J L. ¢ LU U O r o0o (- 33a1s a a Z n - O O _j Y 1392i1S NOSIOVN Q LLJ CC 3AIK ?NOHN3SI3 3oNVAN3 S H �j L� Z l �j1 a LU W ~ a0 a Upryry a (L U) O O N p AVM Nnl V1S NV "I }' N OD • � Ol w Y O N r oo 3nN3nv ONva o r s o „gg N � (� ��V T % � � r °�a a � w � J a � , L CL< m � It U) \ -j %@ a �� U. O D z W co 2 kcc UJcc .. > « i s v� y \ \ � / v � ® 2 a e:� k § ,«o $ § j j E � > < \ ««m70K)S re ���v \% » � e J§ \�2/ z ±\ tm m m� m « «\ LOco � � 04 ) .: p/ �@ �� CID \\§> �@ CID \e �r�\ — e — v mz wf>: /(Cl) C5 F-❑ U 0 _..._ O 00 3AIN0 3?JOHS3AVl m a U - IL OD 00 M �>¢ LL ❑ A0P W 1. M's —� J V C� L cr U � - Q NlooNn LU r = U N F— w F— lll2is NOSIOVW J U O Q Z 3AR10 2IIMOHN3SIl w W U w W Y 3 NVH1Nl 'S'Hw < J C ^ S I— o U w CL a 0w > ri N � � 6d por d � S AVM W�I0V1S SH 10HSNVl Owl ti00 Iq L MOD N (ONro NLO N 00 WN 40 m w ll1NIAV ONViJO .. r p n s M P O I a ¢ S 47 T d'f a 0 zo o W Q C J Q w w O Z J �w N O Q O Li ZO C-) ro�o� �Zl V> J Z C_) w i Z —� W Z Q ~ 01 ,(� O C7 0 ry EO � N6— O �6Q9 401 o0o I L �- Lb CC U w=� w CD �„� �n J W ��z FO -0-01 x z 9 �j L. 3nma ]NOHSDVI 8��y 685' Z W Q F G LLL °°° uj w 58�EL R N > (p T O O W cr } .On 131d1S AOC = � V �N 8 W Y U LLI CC 240 L8l Q 419 o r20 (58t J UO 34 O o00 1 ¢ a Z 1332115 Nl00Nll � 00 oo (3 -- 00 J W CJ LL LL Y 13MIS NOSIOM UJ 7 J ]Alda HMOHN3SI3 o� ~ F - C) 0 1U IONVd1N3 S H + f ZO cS a 0 LU ECP=O 0 00 d fA JL 96z X80 o Z �1 f 06Z N. --N N� r AVM Will V.I.S 'S'H ]KH VI �� we m < LO w W U 0 LO m , 3nN3AV ONtldJ �. o a z o w J W w w � z O ¢oma w OU ►� O zLLJ Q�O z Uvw W Z 2 Of sb9 - 2�Z1 � p J LW O z N O ZS� O �ti (V crL6 CL V zLU CQ U a�r� U J jr M O O -no) �_E NOZo z j 8S X niao 3aoHS3NVl >ei y f ll6 W Y / r OS4 8Z� 00o a 0 O FNM CL > N o a N O W cc } 133aJ.S AOf = j Q w bZ Y U —j L— Q LLI rhJ �ZZ J 284� 33a1s N1ooNn " ^ 28��38 90Z� «� 1 Q a z a0 82Z—��1 T (-' W J 00 O U JY 133a1S NOSIOVW > Q Q 2 H J 3AIa0 a3MOHN3SI3 M tZJ N F- C-) is 3naVH 3l LU � + �— 8SZ fc3aobOZ—� fiAVM W(ll V1S �Sli 3a0H53Ntll a, N iN Ch Nz= e� oz r m N m3f1N3AV ONVaO o e m u ¢ v r ' a 4�> T a 8 CO » \ / D \c \ %/ 0 0 q 7\/ / \\ ����a �2 % \ ® / b ter:: r rr 0 q 2 / a � \ / s:==/� c:� � IL \ LLJ \\ /J )� [[���� ��� \ vz C_I (9\Zq 04 °° - <k Lg L. , Simoo9 ��\s~ « \ r =v \ >- 0 v ^ L--V6[ / ® w q�, �� /kk 2- v 3) �% 40 - LU ~ 4 ( =LL �e mem-� j}\ zw n s \ e §� � a � } ��a: (06� } j �` �§ \ f oot ���� )ƒ :j r.j �y / /\: meows» at: . . \ L) � z .. . — w \«m 0 FT0 �� ` Q o U) W W >- W C/) 0:�o r U J Q i �� O z Q O z� 6 �► �6 O Z 0 a > o � Z �-60O1 O W w w O gZ o00 �b4 �� d F- J W O Z N } � - Q U) 1 ? w z2 r' � MON LU a w O O _D w No00 CL: _D N� O laa z �y 6 M n 3aOHS3NV� > x-126 s -`� r— a O o`'o �r oor� v ��� o CL o ni W } 133a1s Aar = ? Q w U �bZ Y Cl) 42 —J0' ¢ W ir- 292y O r 3B OZ J U O mus N�OONII 28 lOZ o00 1 Q Q Z c CS' LuW ¢ U W 0 W Y i33aIS NOS1aVw > Q J W 3nlaa a3MOHNIS13 �m = W~ N o ` OS l �j F— 3aNVaIN3 SH �J 1 l� gS� 1 a i �l 1 c� a fA w Ll Fa0 6 l �J o00 rn bOZ } �► �08� 1� K f � � Vl cv N� r'J M Cy �— N (mW z AVM MI VIS S H 3a0HSDVI � _ �� � '•ryCl N � — Lon m CJ > O W 00 �wa N 0 % s 0] o N i 3nN3nv oNVas o OD i a fa Table 3-1 Cumulative Projects within the Project Vicinity Project Status Land Use Quantity Units 1, Cottage Lane SP Approved SFR 48 DU 2. Lakeshore Pointe Approved SFR, APT 193 DU 3. Lakeshore Village SP Approved Approved SFR, APT Retail 164 1550 DU SF 4. Wake Rider Beach Resort Approved Resort 62437 SF 5. Circle K Service Station Approved Gas Station 10 Fueling Pos. APPENDIX Date_ ?1262010 Day: Th qday Ave 310 14j1 0 1 >d1 268 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: tVr3S National Data & Surveying Services Machado St and Grand Ave, Lake Elsinore 4 -Way Stop a.. 1.1-1 Stan End AM ]:00 AM 9:00 AM NOON PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM Total Ins & Outs 5 0 2 Prgecl8 150030-001 City: Lake Elsinore I 173 1 0 NOON AM Peak Hour 700 AM NOD. Peak Hour 148 PM PM Peak Nour 500 PM 304 1 'd1 0 1, <1 266 Total Volume Per Leg ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: �p ■ ADV'\ National Data & Surveying Services Riverside Dr and Grand Ave Lake Elsinore Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg AM 700 AM 900 AM NOON PM 4.00 PM 600 PM Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: _N',,D,S National Data & Surveying Services MacV St and HwV 74, Lake Elsinore �.�1-1. Sian eoe AM 7'.00 AM 9=AM NOON PM 4:00 PM 500 PM Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg Data: 2/260015 Day: Thursday 245 1 1 0 1 1 436 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by; NV National Data It Surveying Services Hwy 74 and Grand Ave Lake Elsinore 1 Way Stop iEBI Doer -- Start End AM 700 AM 9:00 AM NOON PM 400 PM 5:00 PM Total Ins & Outs 1 92] IF+! 0 ]12 p"W1, il'. 156030004 City', Lake Elcinoro l 665 1 7-] NDON AM Peak Hour 700 AM NOON Peak Hour 92P PM PM Peak Hour 500 PM 0 Total Volume Per Leg ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: ^11M,M,73%150 73%150 National Data & Surveying Services Hwy 74 and Lakeside HS Stadium WV, Lake Elsinore Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: nI01S National Data & Surveying Services Hwy 74 and School Enhance, Lake Elsinore Dale: WO2015 Day Tnurnrlay Proje0# 156030-006 Ob, Lok ❑einore = AM 293 1 1 640 1 1 4 1 818 AM NDDNi 8 I 1 p I I 0 NOON PM 24 666 11 984 PM Entl AM AM Peak Hour 700 AM NOON NOON Peak Hour PM PM Peak Hour 415 PM 335 I 1 0 1 `.1 37 S"arkeetl o.a n... . Bran Entl AM ]'.00AM 9W AM NOON PM A'.90 PM 600 PM Total Ins & Outs l 676 II 0 1 686 1' MEQ Total Volume Per Leg ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: NDS National Data & Surveying Services Hwy 74 and Lincoln St Lake Elsinore o.mvenia Stan End AM IPO AM 9:00 AM NOON PM 400 PM 6'.00 PM Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg Dal,'. 2/26/2015 DayThursday 3+' 422 1c 1 0 1F':1 815 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: N CC 0 National Data & Surveying Services Hwy 74 and Lakeshor Dr Lake Elsinore Signalized a.m ceuoe. SIM End AM 7:00 AM 9:00 AM NOON 919 PM PM 000 PM 600 PM Total Ins & Outs 756 0 '.?1 944 1'. Prulecl p: 156030-008 Oily: Lake Elsinore 802 NOON Peak Hour 700 AM ' NOON Peak Hour FA 919 PM PM Peak Hour 446 PM 554 1 1 0 1 11 526 Total Volume Per Leg Prepared by NDS/AID VOLUME Machado St Bet. Grand Ave & Tiller Ln Day: Thursday Date: 2/2.6/2.015 City: Lake Elsinore Project N: CAlS_6031_001 0 r 0:00 5• 4• i 9 12:00 13 15 28 0:15 2 2 ` 4 12:15 23 12 35 0:30 2 1 '- 3 12:30 15 19 34 0:45 1 10 2 9 3 19 12:45 _ 20 71 8 54_ 28 125 1:00 0 2 '. 2 1300 ll 15 32 1:15 1 1 2 13:15 26 20 46 1:30 0 1 1 13:30 15 21 36 '. 1:45 0 1 2 6 2 7 _r 13:45 _.,18 76 18 74 36 150 2:00 0 1 _ 'i i 1400 27. 28 50 2:15 0 0 '-. 0 14:15 40 15 55 2:30 1. 0 1 14:30 49 28 77 2:45 3 4 0 1 ' 3 5 14:45 40 _ 151 23 94 ._ 63 245 3:00 1 0 'i 1 15:00 29 23 52 3:15 0 2 2 15:15 30 26 56 3:30 1 0 1 15:30 35 23 58 3:450 2 24 2 6..: 15:45 33_127 18 90 51 217: 4:00 0 4 A 16:00 18 28 46 4:15 0 4 4 16:15 28 is 43 4:30 0 7 7 16:30 38 25 63 1 1 1 4 19 5 20 _ 16:45 33 117 34 102 _ 67 219 _4:45 5:00 3 4 7. 7 17:00 42- 24 66 5:15 4 16 20 17:15 41 26 67 5:30 5 14 '19 17:30 30 26 56 5:45 8 20 15 49:23 69 ` 17:45 35 148 25 101._ 60 249 6:00 12 17 29 18:00 27 24 51 6:15 14 14 '28 18:15 30 17 47 6:30 12 20 132 18:30 24 32 56 6:45 19 57 17 68 '. 36 125: 18:45 30 111 18 91 48 202 7:00 37 16;.53 19:00 18 10 28 7:15 92 28 ''120 19:15 23 13 36 7:30 21 34 `55 19:30 15 14 29 7:45 24 174 37 115 -:61 289 i 19:45 29 85 1.2. 49 41 134 8:00 16 23 _ ti 39 2000 18 14 32 8:15 7 22 S 29 20:15 16 22 38 8:30 20 12 32 20:30 22 22 44 8:45 16 59 11 68 '. 27 127 ' 20:45 14 70 10 68 24 138 9:00 13 8 _ ).21 21:00 11 14 25 9:15 13 10 :'23 21:15 13 9 22 9:30 11 12 t 23 21:30 13 12 25 :. 9:45 14 51 8 38 22 89... 21:45 7 44 9 44 16 88 10:00 18 12 'i 30 22:00 5 7 12 10:15 7 12 19 22:15 7 5 12 10:30 19 9 [ 28 22:30 7 2 9 10:45 14 58 11 44 - 25 1_02 22:45 —6 25 4 18 10 -49 : 11:00 18 11 _ _ ':29 23:00 3 3 6 11:15 15 12 27 23:15 4 0 4 11:30 13 19 ' 32 23:30 2 1 3 11:45 19 65 20 62 ? 39 127 23:45 4 13 2 6 6 119 TOTALS 502 483. 985 TOTALS 1038 791 1829; SPLIT % 51.9°0 49.0% 35.0%11 SPLIT% 568%� 432'% 65,0°% � 0 ,t I I• AM Peak He., 2:00 7:15 7:0 PM Peak Hour 14:15 16.45 1690.' AM Pk Volume 134 122'1 289 PM Pk volume 158 110 '263` Pk Hr Factor 0.473 0.824 0.602 '': Pk Hr Factor 0,806 0.809 :0.981' T:9 Volume X233 183 0 :, 0 416 4 6VOlumo 265 203 0 : 0 1468.`. 7-9 Peak Hoo, 7:00 7:15 7:00 4: 6Peak Hour 1630 1645 1630 ] 9 P Volume 174327. 0 0 289 _ 154 11a 0 0 263 Pk Hr Factor 0.473 0.824 0,000 0.000 0.602 Ph Hr Factor 0.917 0.809 : 0.000 ':Dow '0:981 Prepared by NDS/AM VOLUME Grand Ave Bet. Machado St & Riverside Eir Day: Thursday Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake Elsinore Project8: CA15 6031 002 70:307 9 14 i' 23 12:00 39 37 76 12 8 '20 12:15 43 39 82 3 8 -` 11 12:30 44 42 86 0:45 5 2 29 2 5 32 7 12:45 35 161 37 1'5 72 316 1:00 7 _ 13:00 36 39 75 1:15 3 4 ' 7 13:15 34 53 87 1:30 3 2 5 13:30 43 60 103 _ 1:45 7 15 3 14 '10 29 13:45 44 157 67 219 111 376 2:00 5 1 :; 6 14:00 _ 75 _ 65 140 2:15 1 4 ( 5 14:15 69 50 119 2:30 3 4 '. 7 14:30 43 82 125 _ 2:45 3 12 10 19 13 31"14:45 47 234 81 278 128 512 3:00 3 10 113 15:00 _ 50 51 101 3:15 10 6 (16 15:15 53 74 127 , 3:30 8 12 ;20 15:30 48 73 121 3:45 5 26 13 41 18 67 15:45 38 189 62 260 100 449 4:00 9 17 ';26 1600 54 64 118 4:15 12 18 '30 16:15 60 83 143 4:30 18 39 "57 16:30 52 106 158 4:45 26 65 33 107 59 172 : 16:45 59 225 95 348 154 573 ' 5:00 37 41 _78 v 00 61 108 169 5:15 45 28 k73 17:15 58 89 147 5:30 63 34 197 17:30 67 95 162 5:45 56 201 35 138 91 339 17:45 69 255 108 400 177 655 6:00 53 47 100 18:00 66 6:15 48 49 L97 18:15 47 76 123 6:30 68 44 7,12 18:30 61 82 143 6:45 51 220 44 184 e95 404 ; 18:45 46 220 83 319 129 539 7:00 50 69 119 19:00 47_ 66 108 7:15 86 86 172 19:15 43 58 101 7:30 118 81 199 19:30 50 36 86 7:45 _ 93 347 60 296 153 643 19:45 34 169 48 208 82 377 y 8:00 52 51 303 " 20:00 37 50 87 8:15 59 33 92 20:15 31 55 86 8:30 36 37 73 20:30 36 44 80 8:45 43 190 53 174 96 364 2 20:45 42 146 36 185 78 331 9:00 38 32 170 21:00 _ _ - 31 31 G2 9:15 33 32 X65 21:15 30 26 56 9:30 40 34 74 21:30 20 37 57 9:45 33 144 37 135 70 279 ( 21:4535 35 116 11 105 46 221 10:00 35 42 77 22:00 33 20 573- 10:15 28 31 59' 22:15 18 17 35 10:30 30 26 56 22:30 15 18 33 10:45 29 122 33 132 X62 254 22:45 11 77 17 72 28 149 11:00 37 35 72 23:00 11 14 25 11:15 35 3671 23:15 7 8 SS 11:30 46 36 812 23:30 8 6 14 11:45 41 159 46 153 '87 312 23:45 8 34 7 35 15 59 TOTALS 1530 ' 1425, e, •2955 TOTALS ;1983 2584 4567:x: SPLIT% 518%,' 48,2% 39,3% SPLIT% -143.44' 56.6% 609% 1 1 , 11• AM Peak Hour 7.15 - 7,00 7:00 PM Peak Hour 17:15 17:00 AM Pk Volume 349 296 643 PM Pk Valume 260 '400 ':655 - Pk Hr Factor 0,739 0.860 0.808 Pk Hr Factor `-0.942 ':0.926 0.925 7.9Valume 0:` 0 537 470 1007 4S 6 Volume 0 0 `., 480 '.748 :1228'. > 9Peak Hour 715 700 700 4 6Peak Hour -17.00 -17:0 17:0D > 9 P Volume 0 0 349 296 643 0 0 - 255 :.400 1655 Pk Hr Faztor ` 0.000 0000: 0.739 0860 0.808 Pk Hr Factor 0000 000D :0924 :0.926 0.925 Prepared by NOVATo VOLUME Riverside Dr Bet. Grand Ave & Laguna Ave Day: Thursday Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake Elsinore Project 4: CAIS 6031_003 r 0:00 0• 2' 2 12:00•, 7• 10 17 0:15 0 3 3 12:15 8 7 is 0:30 0 0 0 12:30 8 8 16 0:45 0__ 1 6 1 6 12:45 11 34 5 30 16 '64 1:00 0 0 _ 0 13-00-9-9 18 1:15 0 0 0 13:15 6 4 10 1:30 0 0 0 13:30 14 7 21 1:45 1 1 2 2 3 3 13:45 10 39 11 _ 31 21 70.- 2:00 1 0 '. 1 1400 11 17 28 2:15 1 0 1 14:15 12 13 25 2:30 1 2 1 3 14:30 12 8 20 2:45 1 4 0 2 1 6 14:45 9 44 8 46 _ 17 :90- 3:00 1 1 2 15:00 13 12 25 3:15 1 1 1 2 15:15 11 12 23 3:30 2 0 2 15:30 10 14 24 3:45 2 6 2 4 ` 4 10 I 15:45 10 44 11 49 21 '93 4:00 1 0 _ 1 16:00 12 15 27 4:15 4 1 5 16:15 8 11 19 4:30 7 2 9 16:30 17 12 29 4:45 8 20 1 4 9 24 -. 16:45 11 48 16 54 __.._ 27 '-102` 5:00 11 0 11 17:00 15 12 27 5:15 4 3 : 7 17:15 14 13 27 5:30 7 3 10 17:30 20 18 38 5:45 7 29 1 7 8 36. 17:45 it 60 17 60__ 28 1201 6:00 11 4 _ 15 _ 1800 17 9 26 6:15 11 4 ;;15 18:15 10 16 26 6:30 13 9 22 18:30 7 9 16 6:4512 47 2 19 14 66 G 18:45 9 43 9 43 18 86 7:00 19 _ 1 _ 19:00 9 17 26 7:15 22 15 37 19:15 5 7 12 7:30 26 20 ' 46 19:30 7 8 15 7:45 21 88 12 48 �. 33.. 136J:. 19:45 8 29 10 42 _ 18 71 . 8:00 9 10 ` 19 20:00 7 8 15 8:15 10 2 :'12 20:15 4 13 17 8:30 8 4 12 20:30 4 13 17 8:45 7 34 8 2.4 15 58 20:45 5 20 10 44 15 <:64 9:00 9 4 _ _ 13 21:00 2 3 5 9:15 12 3 15 21:15 2 13 15 9:30 10 7 [ 17 21:30 3 3 6 9:45 7 38 5 19 12 57.,^' 21:45 5 12 5 24 _ 10 -36 r 10:00 4 3--- 1 7 22:00 _ 3 8 11 10:15 8 4 '12 22:15 1 2. 3 10:30 5 2 ' 7 22:30 1 1 2 10:45 6 23 1 10 7 33 2 7 1 12 3 `%19 >' 11:00 7 4 ..� 111 _22:45 23:00 1 2. 3 11:15 6 9 15 23:15 2 3 5 11:30 6 11 `'. 17 23:30 1 3 4 11:45 13 32 7 31 20 63 ++ 23:45 0 4 4 12 4 16 TOTALS 322 176 498 fiOTAL$ 384 447 831 SPLIT % C43% 353% 37.5% I SPLIT% 46.2% 53.81 62.5% AM Peak Hour 3:00 7:15 7:00 Pm Peak Hour 1715 17.00 17:00. AM Pk Volume 88 571 136 PM Pk Volume 62 60 =120 Pk Hr Factor 0.846 0.713 0.739 ':Pk Hr Factor 0,775 0.833 1.0.789 7.9Volume '122 72 0 :' 0 194 '4, 6 Volume 106 114 0 0 222 7-9 Peak He., 7:00 7:15 7:00 4; 6 Peak Hour 1645 17,00 17:00 7=9 Pk Volume 88 57: 0 0 136 _ 60 60 0 0 '. 130 Pk Hr FUtor 0.646 0:713 0.000 oew 0.739 Pk Hr Factor 0.750 0.853 0.000 ''orow —0.789 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Hwy 74 Bet. Macy St & Grand Ave Day: Thursday Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake Elsinore Project8: CA15_6031_004 •' ,t r t r , , 0:00 16 26• '42 12:00' 107 142 249 0:15 17 22 X139 12:15 90 127 217 0:30 18 12 730 12:30 147 133 280 0:45 12 63 14 74 (26 137 ":. 12:45 1300 __ 131 134 475 116 135 518 247 93 1:00 9 8 '17 269 1:15 9 11 20 13:15 157 14S 302 1:30 10 5 115 13:30 158 158 316 1:45 _ 10 38 5 29 15 67 i. 13:45 107 556 164 602 271 1158': 2:00 9 7 ;76 14:00 149 209 358 2:15 13 5 ;18 14:15 160 201 361 2:30 5 6 111 14:30 181 176 357 2:45 10 37 12 30 }22 67 '. 14:45 182 67_2 201 787 383 1459' 3:00 16 12 28 _ 15:00 135 169 309 33:1521 11 '32 15:15 153 200 353 3:30 25 17 42 15:30 149 229 378.. , 3:45 25 87 29 69 154 156 15:45_ 141 578 265 863 406 1441' 400 22 36 TS 1600 168 216 384 4:15 49 30 179 16:15 175 302 477 4:30 63 57 '120 16:30 175 312 487. 4:45 117 251 56 179 X173 430 16:45 151 669 272 1102 423 1771.' 5:00 175 59 234 17:00 _ 186 312 498 5:15 255 53 '308 17:15 156 262. 418 5:30 315 55 370 17:30 161 298 459 5:45 278 1023 73 240 ::351 12631 17:45 176 679 301 1173 477 1852 6:00 196 106 302 1800 _ 180 2.15 395 6:15 196 87 383 18:15 131 239 370 6:30 173 100 273 18:30 155 245 400 6:45 178 743 103 396 281 1139: 18:45 140 606 285 984 425 1590 7:00 163 192 355 19:00 _ _ 126 251 377 7:15 206 205 411 19:15 133 166 299 7:30 313 167 480 19:30 117 122 239 _ 7:45 233 915 159 723 '392 1638 19:45 98 474 130 669 228_..1143;: 8:00 162 142 304 20:00 _ 126 107 233 8:15 161 111 272 20:15 92 1.09 201 8:30 121 114 235 20:30 88 70 158 8.45 108 552 117 484 225 1036:. 20:45 86 392 103 389 189 781 9:00 128 99 327 21:00 85 72 157 9:15 114 113 227 21:15 92. 62 154 9:30 102 103 205 21:30 80 47 127 9:45 131 475 137 452 1268 927 '. 21:45 62 319 54 235 116 554 10:00 111 108 219 22:00 _ _ _ 73 51 124 10:15 116 96 212 22:15 45 52 97 10:30 96 116 212 22:30 47 41 88 _ 10:45 101 424 103 423 204 847 . 22:45 38 203 39 183 77 386'! 11:00 132 116 248 23:00 _ 29 30 59 11:15 137 94 231 23:15 23 31 54 11:30 140 128 268 23:30 22 23 45 1145 130 539 122 460 252 999 '. 23:45 17 91 16 100 33 191` TOTALS' 5147 3559 8706 TOTALS 5714 7605 193191- SPLIT%' 59.1%'. 40.9%1 39.5% SPLIT% 42.9% 571% 60.e% INN AM Peak Hour 5.15 7:00 7.00 PM Peak Hour ;1615 -46.15 1615: AM Pk Volume 1044 723 1638 PM Pk Volume f 687 :1198 1885'." Pk Hr Factor 0,829 0.882 0.853 'i Pk Hr Fact. <0 923 '0960 01946'. 7.9 Volume 0: 0 1467 1207 2674 4:-6 Volume 0 0 ', 1348 122J5 x3623': 7-9 Peak Hour 700 7.00 7:00 4:6 Peak Hour 1615 16;15 1615 7.9 Pk Volume 0 0 915 723 1638 0 0 1 682 :1198 1885:'. Pk Hr Factor ?0.000 g000" 0731 0882 0.853 Pk Hr factor 0000 > 0000 (0923 .0960 01946' Prepared by NDS/AM VOLUME Hwy 74 Bet. Grand Ave & Lakeside HS Stadium Wy Day: 1 hu¢day Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake E15more Project#: CA15 6031 005 �r 0 0:00 18 18 -36 12:00r 140 98 238 0:15 18 16 ': 34 12:15 133 88 221 0:30 9 18 27 12:30 118 125 243 0:45 7 52 10 17 114 i 12:45 111 S02 _ 118 429 _ ._,. 229 931 _ 1:00 12 10 _6_2 =.22 1300 120 131 251 1:15 7 11 18 13:15 134 150 284 1:30 7 7 114 13:30 133 136 269 1:45 4 30 8 36_ "12 66 13:45 131 518 101 518 _ 232 1036' 2:00 _ 8 8 t16 14:00 178 136 37A 2:15 5 11 '.16 14:15 176 112 288 2:30 6 6 '.12 14:30 158 2.38 396 2:45 5 24 10 35 :15 - 59 14:45 178 690 169_ 655 347 1345 _ 3:008 17 25 15:00 150 124 274 3:15 13 15 28 15:15 170 141 311 3:30 11 17 x'28 1530 186 142 328 r. 3:45 17 49 21 70 138 119 15:45 221 727 134 _541 _ ., 355 1268'. 4:00 22 17 i"39 16:00 196 152 348 4:15 19 40 59 16:15 231. 160 391 4:30 40 50 90 16:30 238 156 394 4:45 33 114 92 199 .125 313 $ 16:45 209 874 140 _ 608 ._ 349 1482'. 5:00 44 1.41_ ''185 17:00 247 176 423 5:15 45 203 '248 17:15 216 137 353 5:30 48 263 :311 17:30 2.35 140 375 ' 5:45 62 199 217 824_ 1279 1023 17:45 226 924 176 629 _ 402 15531 6:00 86 153 ''239 18:00 176 155 331 6:15 85 168 253 18:15 206 144 350 6:30 80 123 103 18:30 185 129 314 6:45 89 340 131 575220 911 l 18:45 227 794 131 559 358 1353 7:00 169 137 '306 19:00 214 121 335 7:15 200 186 ':386 19:15 136 123 259 7:30 144 238 '382 19:30 111 113 224 7:45 147 660 162 723 309 1383: 19:45 113 574 90 447 203 1021: _ 8:00 122 130 4252 20:00 82 124 206 8:15 110 120 1230 20:15 81 104 185 8:30 106 117 123 20:30 65 99 164 8:45 95 433 98 465 +193 898 : 20:45 81 309 80 407 161 716 9:60 102 105 1207 21:00 63 83 146 9:15 1.13 95 x208 21:15 48 97 145 9:30 90 91 '181 21:30 46 87 133 9:45 127 432 106 397 :233 829 21:45 48 205 56 323 _. 104 528.' 10:00 86 108 '. 194 22:00 50 55 305 10:15 86 101 187 22:15 40 45 85 10:30 115 92 :'207 22:30 28 41 69 10:45 105 392 97 398 X202 790 :: 22:45 31 149 38 179 69 .328 11:00 113 131 _ :244 23:00 28 34 62 11:15 86 124 '210 23:15 30 27 57 11:30 119 116 '.235 23:30 25 24 49 11:45 111 429 126 497 ,237 9Z6 : 23:45 16 99 19 104 35 203 TOTALS 3154 4281 7435 TOTALS 6365 5399 11764` - SPLIT,% 42.4% 57.6% 38.7% : SPLIT% 54.1% 45.9% 8` 8 AM Peak Hear 7:00 535 7:00 FM Peak out 1615 1430 '16;35' AMPk Volume 660 836 3383 PM Pk Volume 925 672 3557' Pk Hr Factor 0.825 0.795 0.896 'Pk Hr Factor 0.936 0.706 ''0.920 7-9 Volume -1093 d118S 0 : 0 2281 4-6 Volume 1798 1237 0 0 3035.. 7-9 Peak Hour '7:00 7.00 7.00 4-6 Peak Hour 1615 1615 16:15. 7.9 Pk Volume '660 723 0 0 1383 n 925 632 0 0 11557. Pk Nr factor 0.825 0.759 0.000 0.000 0.896 rFact 'Pk Hrfattor 0.936 0.898 o 000 '' D.OW 0.920 Prepared by Nos/Aro VOLUME Hwy 74 Bet. Lakeside HS Stadium Wy & Le Harve St Day: Thursday City: Lake Elsinore Date: 2/26/2015 Project#: CA15 6031 006 1� • r r r P • , 1 0:00 16 17 33 12:00 138 107 245 0:15 20 17 ! 37 12:15 136 85 221 0:30 12 19 31 12:30 120 131 251 0:45 6 12 54 12 10 65 18_1 19 j 17:45 In r, 500 121 444 227 944 1:00 `22 13:00 123 131 254 .: 1:15 7 11 18 13:15 132 150 282 1:30 8 7 { 15 13:30 144 126 270 1:45 4 31 8 36 :'12 67 f: 13:45 136 535 111 518 247 1053 2:00 8 8 :.16 1406 176 156 33{" 2:15 5 10 : SS 14:15 152 145 297 2:30 6 7 13 14:30 207 206 413 2:45 5 24 9 34 '.14 58 14:45_ 194 R9 157 664 351 1393' 3:00 7 18 :25 15:00 151 129 280 3:15 15 15 ,30 15:15 172 134 306 3:30 11 16 27 15:30 191 142 333 3:45 _ 17 50 24 73 [41 123 i 15:45 225 739 145 550_ 370 1289'. 4:00 21 15 36 16:00 201 171 372 4:15 20 42 .62 16:15 244 168 412 4:30 40 47 187 16:30 242 185 427 4:45 33 114 89 193 :122 307 Ifi:45 215 902 152 676 367 1578 5:00 46 138 '184 __ 17:00 262 180 442 5:15 46 201 247 17:15 223 144 367 5:30 46 258 304 17:30 238 147 385 5:45 60 198 214 811 ':274 1009 17:45 235 958 181 652 416_ 1610' 6:00 72. 146 1218 18:00 184 161 - _ 345 6:15 77 151 228 18:15 203 150 353 6:30 79 123 5202 18:30 178 152 330 6:45 83 311 125 545 :208 856 `. 18:45 213 778 153 616 366 7:00 155 137 12 29 19:00 212. 17.4 .1394 7:15 174 158 332 19:15 133 127 .336 260 7:30 146 209 :355 19:30 117 112 229 7:45 148 623 165 669 1313 1292 19:45 111 573 90 453 201 1026 8:00 123 130 253 20:00 9p 120 210 8:15 113 130 243 20:15 93 94 187 8:30 111 113 .224 20:30 94 91 185 8:45 100 447 102 475 '202 922 i 20:45 89 366 79 384 168 750 I 9:00 100 110 :210 21:00 67 79 146 9:15 111 94 :205 21:15 49 101 150 9:30 91 97 188 21:30 46 84 130 9:45 134 436 104 405_ 238 841 21:45 46 208 58 322 104 530 10:00 89 111 200 22:00 4957 106 10:15 89 106 195 22:15 38 42 80 10:30 115 91 206 22:30 31 44 7S 10:45 104 397 100 408 :204 805 22:45 30 148 38 181 68 329 11:00 117 129 246 23:00 29 35 64 11:15 95 125 220 23:15 30 27 57 11:30 123 115 238 23:30 25 25 50 11:45 115 450 128 497 :243 947 :: 23:45 16 100 20 107 36 207 7QTNL5 3135 4211 7346 gTOTALS 6536 5567 ti2303 SPLIT % - 42.7% 573% 37.8% ::SPLIT% 54.0% 46.0Yo- 62,2% 1� • AMPeak HOur 7;W SIS 900 PMPeak Hour 1615 16.15 76:35. AM Pk Volume 623. 819 3292 PM Pk Volum¢ 963 685 1548 Pk Hr Fac[or 0:895 0794' 0.910 Pk Hr Factor 0,919 0.926 0.932' 7-9 Volume 1070 11441 0 0 2214 9-G Volume }860 i 1328 0 ':0 '3188: 7-9 Peak Hour 7:00 700` 7:0 4.6 Peak Hour 1615 : 1415 16:15. 7-9 Pk Volume 623 669. 0 0 1292 963 685 : 0 Pk: Hr. Factor >.0,895 :0.800' 0.000 00W 0.910 'Pk Hr Factor 0919 0.926 :0000 0 -0000 :1648 0.932. Prepared by NDS/AM VOLUME Hwy 74 Bet. Lake Crest Dr & Lincoln St Day: Thu¢day Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake Elsinore Project#: CAIS6031007 1 ' • I I mom' 13=1131111111111 MEMME31111111000 Imam 0:00 18 19 ;37 12:00 172 123 295 0:15 21. 21 4.42 12:15 143 104 247 0:30 13 20 '33 12:30 144 129 273 0:45 9 61 14 74 23 135 12:45 133 59.7. 155 511 288 1103 100 11 11 922 13:00 138 151 289 1:15 7 13 '.20 13:15 154 169 323 1:30 9 7 16 13:30 178 129 307 1:45 5 32 10 41 '15 73 13:45 146 616 150 599 _ 296 1215'' 2:00 10 10 '20 14:00 183 180 363 2:15 6 12 '138 14:15 169 193 362 2:30 6 6 ;12 14:30 246 234 480 2:45 8 30 10 38 ':18 68 14:45 275 873 176 783 451 1656 3:00 7 19 726 15:00 191 1.3 5 326 3:15 14 16 `. 30 35:15 202 160 362 3:30 12 17 29 15:30 219 161 980 3:45 23 56 25 77 '.48 133 15:45 _243 85S 1.84 640 _,. 427 1495 _ 4:00 29 19 048 16:00 233 178 411 4:15 23 43 X66 16:15 232 195 427 4:30 46 53 '99 16:30 234 183 417 i. 4:45 40 138 95 210 135 348 16:45 _ 244 943 1.73 729 — 417 1672 5:00. 55 157 -212 17:00 270 198. 468 5:15 53 212 265 17:15 240 161 401 5:30 59 259 318 17:30 249 174 423 5:45 65 232 228 856 393 1088 17:45 244 1003 202 735 _ 446 1738 6:00 91 165 ..256 18:00 206 181 387 6:15 137 190 327 18:15 220 155 375 6:30 97 127 224 18:30 204 183 387 6:45 93 41.8 142 6_24 235 1042` 18:45 216 846 173 692 _ 389 1538^ 700 182 221 403 19:00 227 134 361 7:15 260 317 ;577 19:15 148 137 285 7:30 246 218 464 19:30 121 121 242 7:45 161_ 849 161 917 :322 1766 19:45 138 634 112 504 _ 250 1138 8:00 132 137 -269 20:00 89 136 225 8:15 123 143 :266 20:15 90 97 187 8:30 127 129 :256 20:30 108 108 216 8:45 502 109 518 =229 1020.'. 20:45 78 365 86427 164 792 ' 9:00 _120 121 120 '241 21:00 80 87 167 9:15 124 112 =236 21:15 54 112 166 930 102 104 :206 21:30 49 87 136 t 9:45 164 511 120 456 ;.284 967 21:45 54 237 _ 64 3S0 - 118 587: 10:00 93 115 2208 22:00 55 68 123 10:15 105 118 :223 22:15 43 46 89 10:30 136 101 237 22:30 33 56 89 t 10:45 121 126 460 247 915 22:45 36 167 46 216___ 82 383 11:00 140 _455 138 X27$ 23:00 27 42 69 11:15 113 141 254 23:15 35 31 66 11:30 134 136 (270 23:30 25 29 54 11:45 139 526 144 559 :283 1085:' 23:45 20 107 25 127 45 234: TOTALS 3810 4830 860.0 '.TOTALS ~534% 7238 6313 13551+ SPLIT% 44.1% 55.9% 38.9% (SPLIT% 466% 61.1°% •' WAR t r AM Peak Hour 3:00 7:00 7.00 PM Peak Hour 1645 1400 17:00 AM Pk Volume 849 917 1766 PM Pk Volume 1003 783 1730' Pk Hr Facto, 0.816 0.723 0.765 >Pk Hr Factor 0.929 0,837 :0.928'. 7.9 Volume '1351 143$ 0 0 2786 '4 6Volume 1946 1464 0 0 3410:: 7-9 Peak He or 7:00 700 7:00 4-6 Peak Hour 1645 1615 17:00.' 7 9Pk Volume 849 917' 0 0 1766 i�.r� 1003 749 0 0 '1738. Pk IF, Factor 0.816 0.723 900x) 0.000 0.765 'Pk Hr Facto, 0.929 0.946 - 0000 >: Dew >: 0.928` Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Hwy 74 Bet. Joy St & Walnut Dr Day: Th ursday Date: 2/26/2015 City: Lake Elsinore Project#: CA15 6031 008 o� t t tY s r, 0:00 10 31 : ql 12:00SOUR 235 179 414 is 0:15 16 27 ;43 12:15 205 161 366 0:30 4 28 32 12:30 197 180 377 0:45 11 9 41 13 14 99 s24 23 140 . 12:45 215 R57 189 7n9 404 1561:. 1:00 1300 183 208 391 1:15 11 16 (27 13:15 204 224 428 1:30 8 7 '15 13:30 200 189 389 1:45 9 37 15 52 : 24 89 f 13:45 200 787 219 840 419 1627 200 9 74 '. 23 14:00 22 6-2 18 qqq 2:15 10 12 22 14:15 212 246 458 2:30 10 7 :17 14:30 252 241 493 2:45 10 39 14 47_ .24 86 14:45 302 992 202 907 504 1899 3:00 8 18 x:26 15:00 240 202 442 3:15 23 20 ';43 15:15 233 229 462 3:30 19 19 : 38 15:30 239 208 447 3:45 29 79 23 80 €52 1591 15:45 243 955 234 873 477 1828' 400 24 24 148 16:00 262 230 _ 492 4:15 50 43 93 16:15 256 215 471 4:30 73 56 329 16:30 286 198 484 4:45 79 226 88 211 :167 437 16:45 310 1114 232 875 542 1989 5:00 104 14 3 247 17:00 282 239 529 5:15 74 209 1283 17:15 260 228 qgg 5:30 111 219 330 17:30 268 234 502 5:45 114 403 208 779 322 1182 : 17:45 265 1075 240 941 505 2016 6:00 108 141 249 18:00 251 246 _ _ qq7 6:15 167 146 313 18:15 240 225 465 6:30 150 122 272 18:30 238 226 464 6:45 167 592 137 _546 304 11381 18:45 174 903 234 931 408 1834' 7:00 228 194 X422 19:00 179 224 _ 403 7;15 266 1.90 456 19:15 165 190 355 7:30 292 195 487 19:30 134 179 313 7:45 245 1031 190 769 435 1800 - 19:45 134 173 766 307 8:00 200 166 366 2000 107 __612 174 287 .1378 8:15 173 159 332 20:15 97 147 244 8:30 176 159 20:30 90 133 223 8:45 161 710 124 608 : 20:45 61 355 130 584 191 939 9:00 207 139 21:00 66 120 __ 186 9:15 193 14G 21:15 65 144 209 9:30 174 128 21:30 66 105 171 9:45 195 769 145 _558 r334 21:45 38 235 89 458 127 693 10:00 176 131 22:00 55 95 150 10:15 191 149 22:15 33 77 110 10:30 181 153 22:30 38 68 106 10:45 181 729 172 605 22:45 34 160 61 301 95 46111:00 194 187 23:00 22 51 73 11:15 178 183 23:15 23 38 61 11:30 210 190 400 23:30 24 42 66 11:45 197 779 191 751 388 1530 23:45 15 84 32 163 47 247 TOTALS 5435 5105. 10540 TOTALS , 8124 8388 16472: SPLIT% 51.6% 484% 39.0% SPLIT% ! 49,3% 507% 61.0% •t t r AM Peak He., 7:00 5:00 7 00 PM Peak Hour 16:30, 17:15 j16AS AM Pk Volume 1031 779 ( 1800 PM Pk Volume 113& 948 2053` Pk Hr Factor .0.883 0 889 0.924 Pk Hr factor 0,918 0,963 0.947 ] 9Volum e 1741 1377:: 0 0 3118 4:-.6 Volume 2189 1816 0 e0 r:g005. ] 9Peak Hour 700 700 7;00 4-6 Peak Hour 1630 ': 1700 16:45 T 9 Pk Volume 1031 769 i 0 0 1800 1135 941 0 0 :2053 Pk HrSactor :0.883 :0.986: 0000 0.000 0.924 Pk Hr factor 0.918 0.980 `0000 0000 0.94] East AM The Mar 31, 201`_+ 7.0:45:39 gage I-1 Scenario Report Scenario Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution Paths: Routes: Configuration: Fast AM Default Command Default Volume Default Geometry Default Impact Fee Default Trio Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration 'Praffiz 8.0.0VIS (c) 20013 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE exst AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:96:39 Page 2 1 Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Del/ V/ LOS Veh C If 1 (;rand Ave & Machado St A 9.2 0.382 Grand Ave & R,i.verside Ave B 11.7 0.094 If 3 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave F 339.6 1.009 If 4 Grand Ave & Macy St F 57.3 0.329 If 5 Lincoln SC & Riverside Dr D 36.2 0.886 1f 6 W Lakeshore Or & Riverside Dr C 25.0 0.523 it 7 High School Entrance & Rversi B 16.0 0.987 If 8 Stadium Way & Riverstdcc Dr B 19.3 0.408 Future Change Del/ V/ n LOS Veh C A 9.2 0.302 i 0.000 V/C B :11.7 0.094 + 0.000 D/V F 339.6 1.009 + 0.000 D/V F 57.3 0.329 + 0.000 D/V D 36.2 0. 88 6 + 0.000 D/V C 25.0 0.523 1 0.000 D/V B 16.0 0.987 + 0.000 D/V B 19.3 0.408 -1- 0.000 D/V Tr'ffi.;; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowii.ng Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE F.rst AM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 10:96:39 Page 3-1 Level. of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 9 -Way Step Method (Base Volume Alternative) +..1111.,11,1 +.,+a.1,........... Intersection Ill Grand Ave s Machado St .11 .1l-IIxI. I +-k s%.&'1,,i>.**1x111111111111#*1.1I1I,I + I, .1...... 11. 11 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X.): Loss Time (sec): 0 Averaq_e Delay (sec/veh): 9.2 Optimal Cycle. 0 Level Of service: A Street Name: Grand Ave Machado St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 7' - R L - 'F - R L - 'r - R ------------ --------------- II--- ...----------- II._.- ------------- 11 ---- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Tnclude Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 li. 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 -------- I------------------ II__.._.._______. ----II...-------------- II-____ Volume Module: Base Vol: 2B3 77 95 213 2 2 1 2 89 1 25 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: _ 283 77 95 213 2 2 1 2 89 1 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 26 77 95 213 2 2 1 2 89 1 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 26 77 95 213 2 2 1 2 89 1 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Fi.nalVolume: 1 26 79 95 213 2 2 1 89 .1 25 ____________ ---------------- II ---------_____II------------- ...-II____--_--_____-I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.02 0.25 0.73 0.30 0.69 0.01 0.90 0.20 0.90 0.77 0.0:1. 0.22 Final Sat.: 16 209 625 298 557 5 276 138 276 592 6 1.52 ------------ I ---- -..._I ----------------I I -----------I I ---------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.38 0.3B 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves: 1111 *111 11, Delay/Veh: 7.6 7.6 7.6 9.9 9.9 9.9 1.8 7.8 7.8 8.7 8.7 8.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.6 7.6 7.6 9.9 9.9 9.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.7 8.7 8.7 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.6 9.9 7.8 8.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.6 9.9 7.8 8.7 LOS by Appr: A A A A A11WayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1. 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 «1+a11111.1111a..a111.11x111n 1+,11x11xr1.x1111111111a1+¢.+11x 11a 11x1111a+1111+1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 1111*iIY* x f.}. A r k l i f I I I A I k, k i A I l I I I"1 114141-11x1111-11 1al 11111-1"+` . ..... A Traffic_ 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowl in, Assoc. Licensed to VA CON.SOLTING, IRV.I.NL Exst AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 4-1 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative -A *Y1li*i}+i )tik*xL1fAA ki**!#-i VFii*k#-1w#tV k*##t♦......'... ......Y.AA Intersoction #1 Grand Ave & Machado St +.............Fwx xix.....x.,rtxn.,. sai,�.,t +.�a............ Approach: North Bound South Buund East Bound West Bound Movement: ----------- I L - T - R ---------------- 1, - T - R ---------------- L - 'P - R L - T - R Time Period: 0.25 hour ----------------- _..______.________ HevVeh: 0% 04 0 0$ Alpha Value: ----------- 0.01 GroupType: ---------------- 1 ----------------- ---------------- 1 I----------- 1 ...____I 1 P[C11: 0.53 0.74 0.47 0.55 P(C27: 0.32 0.10 0.08 0.00 P[C31: 0.10 0.14 0.34 0.40 P[C41: 0.06 0.02 0.10 0.05 P(C5]: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Padj[C1]: 0.007 0.004 0.011 0.009 Padj[C2]: -0.601 0.001 0.005 0.005 Padj[C3]: -0.002 -0.004 -0.009 -0.012 Padj[C4]: -0.004 -0.001 -0.006 -0.003 PadjIC5]: __._________________________I____________.__ -0.000 -0.000 -0.001 -0.000 Lane: LI Ll L1. L1 Lane'Pype: LEFTTHRORITE LEFTTHRORI'PE LECTTHRORITE LEL=HRORT.TE HeadwayAdj: -0.437 0.057 -0.1.60 0.024 Volume: 105 310 5 1i5 Capacity: 850 811 689 700 Degofutil: 0.12 0,37 0.01 0.15 DepHeadway: 4.07 4.35 4.77 4.81. Servi.ceTime: 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 Delay: 7.6 9.9 7.8 8.7 Queue: ------------ 0.i ---------------- 0.6 0.0 0.2 Approach: ----------- ---------------- North Bound ---------------- ---------------- South Bound ----------------- I_____.___________I East Bound West Bound ApproachDel.: 7.6 -------- 9.9 ...------- I__________.______� /.B 8.7 Dulay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.6 9.9 7.8 8.7 LOS by Appr: A A A A Overa11De1: 9.2 OverallLOS: A 'Iraffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed t0 VA CONSOLT)NG, 1:RVTNE Exst AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:96:39 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) >t�y,Fz+ws.+iaa..�+r�++r,i+es+.ae+e+an .nx«s+x�a rwr+w�a+e. �ax+ezfi as+ra+xa+++-kx a. Intersection ill Grand Ave t Riverside Ave Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.7] Street. %dame: Grand Ave Riverside Ur Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound WesL Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- ----- ---------- 11--------------- II --------- I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include include ,Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ----- ...------- ---------- _.__.__11--------------- II--------------- I ------------- ...._I Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 226 0 0 393 33 99 0 91 0 0 0 Growth Ad j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Initial Boo: 19 226 0 0 393 33 99 0 97. 0 0 0 User Ad,: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHL Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHP Volume: T9 Z26 0 0 393 33 99 0 91 0 0 0 Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Volume: 19 226 0 0 393 33 99 0 91 0 0 0 _ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II________ -______I Critical Gap Module: Critical. Gp: 9.1 s-ssx ":=xx xxxxx, xxxs xxxxx, 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xx>a:x-x'x..z . _. �, FollowOpTini: 2.2 . x.,; , xXx= ox ,... xxxxx 3.5 4_O 3.3 xxxx"" xx :x Capacity Module: Cnfll.ct Vol: 376 sxxxx xxxx xxxxx. 973 629 7.88 Potent Cap.. 1199 . .,.. _x zzx xxxxx 525 905 826 „x ., ,.z xxsxs Move Cap.: 17.99 : z>:x: ...xx sxxx xxxx"" 519 398 828 ...ti xxxx xxxs;:,, xx. Volume/Cap: 0.02 "In'XX XxX"1 Y, 1% 11" x 0.09 0.00 0.05 X,'xx xzz.x n x "'.x ------- --------- II------ .._-------- 11--------------- 11---------- ._.____1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 >;....,, xxx.,;x xxxs sxxx xaxx'x xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxs: x„-., Control Del: 8.1 xZ':Ix .:ca... :.xxxs sxxx xxxxx .....,.. "-":" a.,.,,,.. xxrX .......,,_ LOS by Move: A ' ° " ` '- " ' ' ' I ` Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - PT LT - LTR - RT LT - L'IR - RT Shared Cap.: Txxz I:XXX XX. X X xxz:xr. sxxx 625 xrsxxx xxxx ..xxX SharedQueue:x>:xrx aanac xxxx. xx-a xxxx"" .",axax 0.5 ""xxxs sxxxx<.,.__.._ Shrd COnDcl: a"x"'.'t c x xxxx xxxxx x ,=x 11.7 sxxx. : "n so x Shared LOS: +. " " * ' * a B " ' ApproachDel: xxxx.xx x:-:sxxx ..-- sz:xzxx Appr oachLOS: " * B a++rsa, F+w+��a xs�x +�i err_F -xxxx,+iaxa<++ „ +++e aaer♦+artaar,a.�+.+i,w xrz»+aaa�+.,. e. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. xxa, ,+a.+.>xa�.,2xxxx,s x+xsxexaee„ +xx xxaxaxxzn �..xxxx++<atrxa+x+a ,,,., xxx xa ,axx lraffin 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dow7.ing Assoc. T.1.censed to VA CONSULTTNG, IRVINE st AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignal.ized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection )k2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Rnund Wesr Round Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ----------- I ---------------- I ------------- .._..._----- _.---------- I -------------I IlevVeh: 08 Ofl Oa Grade: 0'R Oi 0' 0 Peds/flour: 0 G 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 po�aling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOL'TlNG, IRVINE Lust AM The Mar 37., 2015 10:96:39 Rage 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsi.gnalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ..............xx ...... Intersection l3 SR 79/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Average Delay (sec/veh): 72.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: Street Name: SR 771/Riverside Dr Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Boond Past Round West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R ------------ --- ----------- II--------------- II.--------------- I ------ ....-------- I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7. 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _-... ------- --------------- II---------------- II---------------li----- Volume Module: Base Vol: 170 561 0 0 695 75 109 0 282 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 170 561 0 0 695 75 109 0 282 U 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "i..00 PHB Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 PHP' Volume: 170 561 0 0 695 75 109 0 282 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final.Volume: 170 567. 0 0 695 75 109 0 282 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- H.--------------- I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 9.1 xxx; xxxxx xxxxx xxxxo-,-ex:'u exxx.. L07.10410pT 11Yl: 2.2 XSXx xxxxx xxxXx Y.x`!.x xxxxx 3.5 9.0 3.3 z.n?.n., ....,_.-...-_.._. _______...-_- --------------- -------- --------------------- 1 1 --- I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: "720 -xxxx .v...-, .,:xx xxxx xa:xxx 1584 1589 683 xxx>. ;, �...,..,. �,.nnx h.ti., � ...,.,.. Potent Cap.: 891 -:xxx xxxxx xxxx xx_x xxxxx 121 110 953 xX .:,xx_ Move Cap.: 891 xxxx xxxxx; xxxx xxxx xxxxx 103 89 953 Xxox Volume/Cap: 0.19 ..-xxxx. x-rxx ...-..r, xxxx x a x o 1.01 0.00 0.62 .-._.-.. ..xxX ...----_______I---- ...._--------- II--------------- II--------------- II ------._--------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.'7 xxxx xxxx xxxx. xxxxx, xxxs .. .: x -ixx; ? n..n ...._...- xx,_ ,�...�,_ _........ Control Del: 10.0 :xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx,. xY,,xx ,xxx1a...x. :xxxx :_,xxxx.. :. -..._xxxx ���..-. _,...-. ..,-�:--- LOS by Move: A " Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTB - RT .Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ::xxx 237 =xxc........ , ,,xxxx.. xxxx .,.. .-.., SharedQueue:xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 29.6 x.....-:; xxxxx xx s so-.:.-: Shrd ConDel : xcxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx 390 xxxxc -.c . ... Xx ,,.....,.. -. xx....� .,xxxx-.., .,. .-.x:.: .Shared LOS: * " ' * ' ` " F ApproachDel: ;xxxxx 339.6 ApproachLOS: Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ++1k..1113+1,111 11#t4.i..L+*++F#. 41*1111- 1,1Ak +d..l,}xxfsx. uY 11F11'', tx Craft L": 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Gxst AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Traffin 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowiing Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINF Intersection 10 SR WRiverside Dr r Grand Ave -A*11 ki'♦**#i�arY1A*i ka AtAAi*Y%'i41±.1�#*+11-.1*if-*}W 1Yk**i*sx k-1+*1-*1*YLA*1-k**i /t2*1] Approach: North Bound Soul Bound Da st Pound West Bound Movement: L ----------- ____.------------ - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'f - R HevVe.h: --- ----------- ---------------- 01, I_ Oo -_—_----__-__-I OT Grade: 0-° 0- On 0" Pods/11011r: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour Traffin 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowiing Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINF Exst AM T-ae Mar 31., 2015 10:96:39 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignali7ed Method (Base Volume Alcer:native) t♦Vii#t#**it#'.**%'*\YYAA+i**�*AY'.�1--*S tk ti AAk*#A iil,lki a'1-.\A+4*+3*1,i FAt+51'+'f'\*** Intersection 44 Grand Ave & Macy St rraa...*s++*e*a.... ...........ru Average Dela (sec/veh **_ * +___ Worst Case Level Of Service:t[ 57.3] . +*g♦+I...e+m.......� ..,.kse+a*..xa« Street Name: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L -- 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- I --------------- II----------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---- Control: uncontrolled uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Incl de Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1. 0 0 7. 1 0 0 0 0 --- I --------------- II----------- __--II--------------- II-------- 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 657 0 0 907 29 29 0 52 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 '1.00 '1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 657 0 0 907 29 29 0 5"- 1, 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 i.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 657 0 0 907 7.9 29 0 52 1 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lina lVo1 ume: 9 657 0 0 907 29 29 0 52 1 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- _11 ----------------- II -- Critical Gap Module: xx Critical. Gp: 4.1 x.xxc xxxxx -r,.,azx -.:,-: xxxx;: 7.1. 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx x,.. FollowUp'Pim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x..nx x>:xxx 3-5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxx:: xxxxx _...---------- j--------------- j j.------------- __-11 ---------------- II ------I Capacity Module: CnflicC Vol: 936 xxxx xxxxx XXIXIV.. ,.. 1542 1582 907 1623 xxxx, xxs:xx Potent Cap.: 740 xxxx. xoxxxxxxc ;_...- -. B9 11.0 337 B3 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: '740 xxxx xxxxx xxxx s>:xx. x:1ut11:` BB 1.09 337 70 r:xxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx s,,x xxxx 0.33 0.00 0.15 0.01 xxxx xxxx ---------- I --------------- II--------------- 11---------------- 11----__--_---___1 Level 0£ Service Module: 2'Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxrx>; >:xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx. 0.5 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control, Del: 9.9 xxxx xxxxx xxs:: 17.6 57.3 xxxxx ...,n,... xaxf. LOS by Move: A * ' " _, ' * C F x i Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - L'PR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxx x;z_:xx 88 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared9ueue: 0.0 Hoax xxxxx 0.0 zxxx "*' 1.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx:;x xxxxx Chid COnDel: 9.9 =xx xxxxx 7.2 v...,.. 64.7 x.,...- xxxxx -,xxa XXX.. ........x Shared LOS: A I ` A I P I * ' ApproachDel: .,.......,,, xxxxxx 34.5 57.3 AplroachL05 * U F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 'raffia 6.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA C0NSOLTING, IRVINE P:Bst AM Too Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative I I I I I I I I i I I , I II ........ 1tF'k,,IIIIIIitIIIli1F.v...........Ai:A{iY*iir�Ala In AlYdiAAe Intersection 44 Grand Ave & Macy St 1%111)e#i111+111iy*iiiik*##*}J1;F**f+#i1+FA*ff i+AayS*f+kYA1**1{#*A1�Y 1*xTi41�..A 1. ADprna �}�: Worth Bound South Dound Bast BUufld West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L ___________ I ----------------- I---------------- - T- R Bevveh: 0% 0% Oo 0 Grade: 0€, 0s; 0,(, Peds/Hour: 0 p 0 0 Pedestr.iau Walls Speed: 4.00 .feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet I2 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour Ttiffi_i H, 0.0'/15 (c) 200£3 Dowling Assoc. 1,icensed t0 VA CON SUL1'10 G, IRVINE Best AM 'File Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 11 Leve]. Of Service Computation Report 2000 I1CM Operations Method (Ease Volume Alternat,-.ve) 11£#111.1.....1111111.11111111£...111 intersection A5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr ..1111111..11.1..11£111+31-1£ 1£ 111111£ h 111 A 1.. . 1111..111,11,+1 Y'*fdll£1151 *i 111111 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol./Cap.('): 0.886 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 36.2 Optimal Cycle: 86 Level OService: D *111iA#t.111111111#.11111.*1.1 1+111.-1111..1.,1114t,£1111111 ...... 1111.#1f�*1 ... Street Name: Lincoln St Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - '1' - R L - T - R L - 'P - R ------------ ---------------- il--------------- II--------------- II ----- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Mir,. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YhR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II----------------- II----- ...--------- II -- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 368 0 279 165 685 0 0 636 58 Growth Add: 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 36B 0 279 165 685 0 0 636 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 368 0 279 165 685 0 0 636 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 368 0 279 165 685 0 0 636 58 PCE, Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina lVolume: 0 0 0 368 0 279 165 685 0 0 636 58 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Saturation ------Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1..00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 989 0 750 1805 1900 0 0 1722 157 ------------ I ---------------- II --II --- ._----------- II - Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.09 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 Crit Moves: I'll 1111 111. Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.10 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.42 Volume/cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.8 0.0 26.8 44.3 18.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 Incremnt Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 12.6 36.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 InitQueuDel: O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.3 0.0 39.3 80.3 20.1 0.0 0.0 38.8 38.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.3 0.0 39.3 80.3 20.1 0.0 0.0 38.8 38.8 LOS by Move: A A A ll A D F C A A D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0.2 U -> 8 16 0 0 23 23 1111111£1+11++1111., 11 I .x'111 .111 I,1 -,ii IA11x11#111111 i I A 111 A 111 x I 1 A. 111 a 11 A i.1 Note: Queue reported is tike uumher of cars per lane. TrafYix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE: ExsL AM Tun Mar 31, 2015 10:96:39 Page 12-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative i-#1111*-k*rr1AY 1-}%**it<AA+rx.i YitY*.1L.IIAk*x.111111 kf 111.11111#*)LiY AA x#A1AYxa1 Intersection N5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr +11 �1 e11x.1 r1. 1.1ra,1e1r1..1}1 a .+ e1a11..e>+«1v1 erelxel.. r1.11i. ........1x1 Apprcarh: Morth Bound South Bound East, Euuud West Uound Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- 11 --------------- IdCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :L! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 Lane Group: xxxx xxxx cuss LTR LTR LTR I, 1'case ` RT RT ALnsIuGrps: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 10 1 1 ---------- I --------------- II --------------- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 7.2 12 1 l2_ 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 'h GeV Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0= 0`6 0's 01" Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other:> . > > > Cn1t Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0� ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include & RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II____.___________II_____._______.___I IICM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 9 xxxx 9 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xx,: 1.00 1.00 1.00 axx":x 7..00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: xxxx xxxx ;rxxxs 1.00 xxxx, ]..00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx x _,. 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 x...y.... ,xxx 1.00 1.00 v Parking Adj: xxax xxxx a;Xsx�: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx x ]..00 7..00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 x,n, 1.00 xxxxxHxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxxx. etas 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx. 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.95 .,. 'a I, -, -�•v xxxx xxzx xxxxx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I. 00 Fnl Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II. ------------ ...__II_______.________I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 1 No . 11 > > . , , > . > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated . . ,> . . > > De.lAdjFctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0\00 1.00 7..00 1111111ar,11r11... .........11111411111111+....1 et...... ea e.l}}.#1a11e111e1.k" Traffix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING. IRVINE _t AM Tu(, Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Paye 12 Level Of Service Detai.l.ed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 I1CM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection If Lincoln St k Riverside Or k+1+fA+a#}i,)�A1F*t 14���iiii.il\114*+*Xi)I4*#i*XYY �x*L1*}Ai1Y !*xkA1A+A}1**s )i)A_11 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T -- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11_____----__--__I Green/Cycle-: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.10 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.42_ 0.42 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7._00 1.00 Q1.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 16.6 4.5 14.3 0.0 0.0 17.8 17.8 Opstrea111VC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Opst reamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyAn:Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 5.2 3.4 2.1 0.0 0.0 5.3 5.3 HCM2KQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 0.0 21.B 7.9 16.4 0.0 0.0 23.1 23.1 --------- ...._-------------- ..._._11 --------------- II--------------- II___________._ --_I 70th4 Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.20 1.16 1.18 1..7.7 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.16 HCM21c70thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 25.2 9.4 19.1 0.0 0.0 26.7 26.7 ------------ 1---------------- 11. --------------- 11--------------- 11_______________I 851h°Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.45 1.60 1.45 1.53 1.47 1.60 1.60 1.44 1.44 HCM2k85thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 31.5 12.1 24.2 0.0 0.0 33.2 33.2 ._...---- -------- 11 ------ 1 1---------- 1 1----- 90th',Pactor: 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.53 1.80 1..53 1.67 1.58 1_80 1.80 1.53 1.53 HC112 k90thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.4 0.0 33.4 13.2 25.9 0.0 0.0 35.2 35.2 11 ______II_______________ 11 ---------------- I 95thP,Factor: 2.10 2.10 2.10 1..68 2.10 1.68 1.89 1.74 2.10 2.10 1.67 1.67 HCM2k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.6 0.0 36.6 15.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 38.5 38.5 --------------- 11 --------------- II_______ ----___-II----- I 98th°,Factor: 2.70 2.70 2.70 1.89 2.70 1.89 2.24 1.98 2.70 2.70 1..87 1.87 HCM2f198thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 41.1, 17.8 32.6 0.0 0.0 43.2 43.2 L affi., 8.0.071.6 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINE East AM Tue Mar 31, '-015 10:46:39 Rage 12-3 Fuel Consumption and B,,ssions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I I I I I III.II1 Ai ........... k,I*Y I I.,II1Ai III,i -F -k x A i i I I III I, n,,,—........ Intersection #5 Lincoln St t Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound Annth Rnnnd Rast Round West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'r - R T. - T - R ------------ I ------------ .....__II__... ------------ II --------------- 11__-____________I Run Speed: 30 MRH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.0 0.0 64.4 40.7 129 0.0 0.0 147 13.4 ._...._________________________________.________.__________._..-________-_________..._____ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 82.842 pounds 13.420 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 258.468 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 20.797 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.922 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0-927 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 82.842 pounds 13.420 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 258.468 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 20.797 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.922 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.927 pounds _________________________________.________-_________-_________.____________________ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAPFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements- '1'raffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE, Bast AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:39 Page 13-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *k1.Yi1X3+2A1111k**f 31*Y%'1'1....111*11--kit1*.1isi-11,,, A....11.11*f*1��tA%}a�f±, k�Aa-Ai Intersection 116 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr 4�F 1�A�1x-k#111 YS#'*#Yw#13t]*i*lk**4###11111+*#%ii\+11111YAi.1 #1-Yi*-A.1-1Y�1-. A. 1l1r. Af Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.523 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/vch): 25.0 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: C 1111111*t*iY 1..............t*111.1f#f*it*:F*x*Tf1-1tA-F*#-Fi kAl hhX %'i Xtaaii+#*i 1AA)* Street Name: W Lakeshore an Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Round West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R iL --T - R ._...._------------------ ...._...--- II--------------- II-------------- ...II... .-- -- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YIR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1. 0 7. 0 1 ------------ --------------- II---- ._.---------- II--------------- II -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 174 180 8 216 242 96 111. 578 292 20 486 131. Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Lie: 174 1.80 8 -16 242 96 111 578 292 20 486 131 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHPVolume: 174 180 8 216 242 96 111 578 292 20 486 131 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 174 180 8 216 242 96 111 578 292 20 486 1.31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLI' Adj: 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1..00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 it nal Volume: 174 1.80 8 216 242 96 111 578 292 20 486 131 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -_-------._...._._--I Saturation Glow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 final Sat.: 1805 3136 153 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 167.5 1805 1900 1615 ------------ I --------------- II.--------------- II--------------- II ---------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.18 0.01 0.26 0.08 Crit Moves: 1*dA "11 '1A" I'll Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.10 0.7.0 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.52 0.46 0.52 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.52 0.17 Uniform Del: 36.8 43.2 43.2 34.8 40.7 40.4 41.5 10.9 11.2 47.1 17.5 14.2 111cremntDel.: 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.'7 1.1 1..6 2.3 0.1 0.2 2.9 0.5 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 38.3 45.1 45.1 36.4 41.8 42.0 43.8 11.0 11.4 49.9 18.0 14.3 User Del .Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 38.3 45.1. 45.1 36.4 41.8 42.0 43.8 11.0 1.7..4 49.9 18.0 14.3 LOS by Move: D D D D D D D 13 13 D B B HCM2 L.AvgQ: 54 4 6 9 3 9 5 1 ]. 10 .�,,,, 11.++��1 ix1e1111+11..,11.1.>.1«1.11111 x.1111>+111,.11. ,.111111. 1.1111111 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. I t 1,a �l I i'1, 11111#+##t1111#i#ki1.1)k�#IIY 1111 i-*a1lI,IIlk1 A,, 1111+ 1, � 1> 114' 3111 111.1 Traffiz 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA COWIHLTI.NG, IRVINE Exst AN Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:dC :39 Page 19-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr a,a xx�.-+axe=e� „a.a as „ xeex». ,,e,sex+a uexx +ass..xsa+exa+x�ixe+>aaerxaxxxxienzxs Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- I -------- ...------ II. --------------- 11 --------------- 11_________-__-__1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 _. 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R #LnslnGrps: 1. 2 _ 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- 11________-__-___I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 7.2 12 1.2 12 12 12 1.2 CrsswalhWid: 8 8 8 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0; 01" 0$ 02: Parking/HL No No No No Bus Stp/Hr.: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: , < .< < Other > > > > > , , > , > , . . . , Cnf-t Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include a RT PrCct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ 11--------------- II--------------- 11_---__________-1 HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(l.t) Case: 1 xxee xxxx 1 7:xxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx ------------ I --- ----------- 11 --------------- -------- ------ --------------- HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid 'Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxxx 1..00 1.00 xxX, x,xx 1.00 xxxx oxen 1..00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Bus Ste Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 z:xxx nee, 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 :1.00 RT Adj: xa 0.99 0.99 xxxx xrxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxxx xan0.85 r.. LT Adj: 0.95 cn _.X 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx :,xxxx 0.95 xxxx x,,xx,x PedBi.ke Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 ------------ 1--------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11______-________I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < , < < , , I I I, , � < < No > > > > > > . , > > > , > , > > > Signal Type: I I < < , , < I < < Actuated , I > > > > > > > > > - ` . DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 <*A-1#1-};t#'x Alk*ixx**-11i+4}%A-xI1>3x***i*A+#4xtiYY++-F}*xx.4 tx}t+#xi ak ti41**x*�tex Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:96:39 Page 14-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM20oG Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ..A£F££ ....A£lkalx........ )�££hk£lY l�lnar�iAF1:-hA intersection #6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr £s+a+r t££xx♦ „ x£r�+++ " ,*s£w££r.r�.�££+,++�.£+rim+ �.££ms �a a,ra£+,u +rya+eaa.+aa Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'I' - R ------------ I---------------- II_______________11--------------- II_ _.____1 Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.49 0.49 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgG'actor: 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Or: 4.4 2.6 2.6 5.3 3.3 2.5 2.9 4.3 4.2 0.5 9.3 2.0 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Q2: 1.0 1.1 1_1 1.2 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.2 HCM2RQueue: 5.4 3.7 3.7 6.5 4.3 3.3 3.9 9.7 9.7 1..0 10.3 2.2 ---------- I--------------- II--------------- 11_____ -II--- 70th;Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1-19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.19 HCM21--70thQ: 6.4 4.4 4.4 7.7 5.1 3.9 9.7 5.6 5.6 1.2. 12.2 2-7 _---------------- I___.- ---------- I...- I..._ --------I 85th'Factor: 1.55 1..56 1.56 1.54 1.56 1.57 i.56 1.56 1.56 1..59 1.51 1.58 HCM2k85thQ: 8.4 5.8 5.8 10.0 6.8 5.2 6.1 7.3 7.3 1.5 1.5.6 3.5 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- 11---------------- 11_...._______---___I 90th°.,Factor: 1..71 1.73 1.73 1.69 1.72 1-14 1..73 1.72 1.72 ]..78 1.64 1.76 HCM2k90thQ: 9.2 6.5 6.5 11.0 7.5 5.7 6.8 8.1 8.1 1.7 16.9 3.9 ------------ I---------------- I I ----------I -----I I--'-- 95th-'Factor: 1..99 1.99 1.99 1.92 1.97 2.00 1.98 1.96 1.96 7.07 1.84 2.03 HCM2k.95thQ: 10.5 7.4 7.4 12.5 8.5 6.6 ZZB 9.2 9.2 2.0 19.0 4.5 ------------ I--------------- II-_-_____.______- 11 ------ ..-------- II---- 98th`dFactor: 2.36 2.45 2.45 2.31 2.42 2.48 2.44'-.40 2.40 2.63 2.15 2.54 HCM2k98thQ: 1.2.7 9.1 9.1 15.0 10.5 8.1 9.5 11.2 11.3 2.5 22.2 5.6 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst AM 'Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 14-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Int ersect ion #6 W Lakeshore Dr G Riverside Dr xe�i,.+e+x+,i.. Fer«� „ r+ax+xer+x+xar++eaes+nf +rr xx+++xva „arx.+>a.�x�o-aaa�,�x�as Approach: North Round South Bound East BUund West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ..------------- I --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II____.______._____I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 39.3 43.0 1.9 48.0 56.5 22.2 26.1 73.6 38.1. 4.9 83.3 18.2 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 74.932 pounds 12.139 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 233.787 pounds Carbon Monoai_de: 18.227 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.269 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.850 pounds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 74.932 pounds 12.139 gallons Carbon Di.o;cide: 233.787 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 18.227 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.269 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: O.850 pounds ____________ DT.SCLA7:MER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and 'PRADFT.Y. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Bust AM Tue Mar 31, 201!, 10:46:40 Page 15-1 Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Rase Volume Alternative) Intersection 01 High School Entrance s Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.487 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.0 Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: B Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I. - 'T - R L - 11' - R L - T - R ---------------- II--------- ._----- II--------------- 11------ _____-----I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Fro]ude Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1. 7. 0 _________...______________II____......-________II-___________._-_11_-------_------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 0 ll 227 0 34 42 580 3 4 640 293 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 11 227 0 34 42 580 3 4 640 293 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 11 0 11 227 0 34 42 580 3 4 640 293 Deduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: .. 0 1.1 227 0 34 42 580 3 4 640 293 PCF Adj: 1.00 1.00 J..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 ELF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 2 0 11 227 0 34 42 580 3 4 640 293 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II___ -___________I Saturation Flew Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900. 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.88 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 0.15 0.00 0.85 0_B7 0.00 0.J.3 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.37 0.63 final Sat.: 257 0 1413 1555 0 233 1805 3588 1.9 1805 2360 1080 ------------ I ---------------- II.--------------- .II.--------------- II_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01. 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.02 0.16 0.1.6 0.00 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: i", '"1. 111A Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.56 0.56 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.49 0.49 Uniform Del: 48.8 0.0 48.8 28.7 0.0 28.7 46.4 9.7 9.7 49.3 13.5 13.5 IncremntDel: 13.3 0.0 1.3.3 0_'7 0.0 0.7 4.3 0.1 0.1 9.7 0.2 0.2 InitQueubel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 62.1 0.0 62.1, 29.4 0.0 29.4 50.7 9.8 9.8 59.0 13.7 13.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 62.1 0.0 62.1 29.4 0.0 29.4 SO./ 9.8 9.8 59.0 13.7 13.7 LOS by Move: n A E C A C D A A E B B HCM2LAvgQ: 1 0 1. 7 0 7 _ 4 4 0 9 9 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. I I I I I I I I I, I l A l 1 l 4 A+#. 4. l a v J+ k A i., 1, F d?' k1 11411111111111�111i n, 1141 "1 11 1;1114 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 7AViNE Eest AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:96:90 Page 16-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative #taYAF#i3#YYIl**........ .. #*.YY ....... IA'Y-1-i 1l Alii Intersection 147 High School. Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bnnnd South Bound East Bound Wont ]sound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L -- T - R _......_.--------- I --------------- II ------- _.------- II----------- ...---- II --------------- I 11CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1. i. 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1, 1 0 Lane Group: LTR b'I'R LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT #Lns InGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 .____---____-I ----- .__ II _----__________________II._____---_._____II---__._____----_I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 Crsswal.kWid: 8 8 8 8 ]; Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0 0`.: 07. 0; Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < , , < < Other > > >, Cuff Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 �0 Ex chis i. veRT: Include Include Include Include R RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ _.____--____--__II --------------- II----- ...--------- II_ -__-----_.____-I HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 9 xxxx 9 9 xxxx. 9 1 -1,: xxxx ]. ;:xrx xxxx: ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II_____ ----_._____I HCM Ops Saturati.on Adj Module: in Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: .1..00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 x.,.,., 1.00 axe 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 ,xsx 1.00 1.00 _.rxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 xxxx 0.89 0.98 xxxx 0.98 xxxx: 1..00 1.00 ..xxx 0.95 0.95 LT Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.96 Maxx 0.96 0.95 xar7,, xxaxx 0.95 xxxx x.._,..,, PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.88 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.95 1..00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Usr Sat Adj: i.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fn1 Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.88 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.97. 0.91 --------- ...__1 --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > , > , > > > . , > > , Signa]. Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > , > > > DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 '1'raf,f.ix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1RV1NE Ehst AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 16-2 Leve:. Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 147 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr **l1-ry IAY++11111*=`31�1L****+l�l*tkf*+11A\kkX*iY-1k*kti*it}{#*#k**Y%ttAAAA 1YFT'1! Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'r - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'r - R ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II__ -__--____._-_-I Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.07, 0.56 0.56 Arrivai'rype: 3 3 3 3 Progk'actor: 1..00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Ql: 0.4 0.0 0.4 5.9 0.0 5.9 1.1, 4.1 4.1 0.1 8.3 8.3 Up8treamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 02: 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.9 HCM21._Queue: 1.0 0.0 1.0 6.9 0.0 6.9 2.0 4.5 4.5 0.4 9.2 9.2 ------- ...---- I---- --------- II--------------- II--------------- II 70th', Factor : 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.18 1_20 1. IB 1.20 1.1.9 1.19 1.20 1.i8 1.18 HCM2k70thQ: 1-2 0.0 1.2 8.1 0.0 8.1 2.3 5.3 5.3 0.5 10.9 10.9 ____________------- ------- II---------------- II--------------- II-- 85th:>Factor: 1.59 1..60 1.59 1.59 1.60 1.54 1..58 1.56 1..56 1.60 1.52 1.52 HCM21<85thQ: 1.7 0.0 1..7 10.6 0.0 10.6 3.1 7.0 7.0 0.7 14.0 14.0 -I i----- -- -I- 90th-';Factor: 1.78 1.80 1.78 1.68 1.80 1.68 1.76 1.72 1..72 1.79 1.65 1.65 HCM2k90thQ: 1.8 0.0 1..8 11.6 0.0 11.6 3.5 7.7 "7.7 0.7 15.3 15.3 --------- ---------- _---- I I ------------I ---'I 1----------I 95th%Factor: 2.07 2.1.0 2.07 1.91 2.10 1.91 2.04 1.97 1.97 2.09 1.86 1.86 HCM2k95thQ: 2.1 0.0 2.1 13.1 0.0 13.1 4.0 8.8 8.8 0.9 17.2 17.2 ____________i_ __.-II_---II____ II 98th',Factor: 2.62 2.70 2.62 2.29 2.10 2.29 2.56 2.41 2.41 2.67 2.19 2.19 HCM2k98tho: 2 7 0.0 2.7 15.7 0.0 15.7 5.0 10.8 10.8 1.1 20.2 20.2 1'x of Pir. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst AM Tue May 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 16-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative {f AA I I } I IIItt.N*##i.... I A I . . . . . . k A A a -,, . ... kk1.... i***#}f Intersection #7 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound Couth Ea;und Sdn aL Bound West Bound Movement: 1, - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ------ --------- II --------------- II ---------- ._---- II_______.________I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.5 0.0 2.7 46.5 0.0 7.0 10.2 69.8 0.4 1.0 97.3 99.6 _..______________________________________._____________________-______._____________ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 42.267 pounds 6.897 gallons Carbon Eioxide: 131.872 pounds Carbo; Monoxide: 9.847 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.635 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.990 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 42.267 pounds 6.847 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 1.31.872 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 9.847 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.635 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.490 pounds ____________________________ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of differcut signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analys.i.s or a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIC. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the i.nfluence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East AM 'Too P7ar 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 17-1 ------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 DOM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) xi1AYYA F-k**++�<i-*}--AIA.}#'�♦**tfi 4?-!***iitAA c*+A..........Ala lk]*-Fi li+t+#Y.-I.A.AAA Intersection #8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol ./Cap.(X): 0.408 Loss Time (sec): 8 Averaq_e Delay (sec/veh): 19.3 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B kllAll**1*ki#i+*-A***-F YiA*t*i-1)AAAAk%f*+1�k***2*il iA}x`++-A)lAl+*{fA4Fi YF Y r*-AllArkA Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement:- 'P - R L - T - R L -- T - R L - - R ------------ ----------.___-II--------------- II--------------- Ii --------------- I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1. 1 0 -------I- II ----------- -------------- II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 7 1 12 99 1 147 173 494 1 .5 570 79 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial Eve: 7 1 12 99 1 147 173 494 1 5 570 79 User Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: "7 1 12 99 1 147 173 494 1 5 570 "79 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 1 12 99 1 147 173 494 1 5 570 79 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LinalVolume: 7 1 12 99 1 147 173 494 1 5 570 79 ------------ --------------- II--------------- i1--------------- II - Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 0.87 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.01, 0.99 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1..76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1413 202 1615 1805 11 1606 1.805 3603 7 1.805 3113 432 _--------------- 11 --------------- 11 -------- ....------ 11 --------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sa'L: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: `",. 11.1 akll 4'l Green/Cycle: 0.01, 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.18 0.26 0.26 0.41 0.41 0.47, 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 Uniform Del: 49.0 47.5 47.6 33.2 33.1 33.7. 32.4 6.3 6.3 48.8 18.6 1.8.6 Incremnt Del: 5.5 0.1 1.9 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7_00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 54.5 48.2 49.4 33.5 33.9 33.9 33.0 6.4 6.4 52.9 18.8 1.8.8 Uscr DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 54.5 48.2 49.4 33.5 33.9 33.9 33.0 6.4 6.4 52.9 18.8 18.8 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C A A D B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1. 0 1. 3 4 4 3 3 0 7 7 .........i........#--ASl4}.+fA++ a, ni FF}£ 111, 11 A# 1 I I i,. i l*% In I ll.11+Yi 11 o.. 1_A_.1zI II Note: Mueue reported is the number of cars per lane. I.ro.l.. I I x lel. e e. A e...... s I I l I, I,x.+Ilii..... 'Praffi[t 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, PV1NE Exst AM '1'ue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 18-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection I18 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr r#}Af�Y*}**))�iF***i, �iih'R-k*+�a111k+3%y}k*+f**tt A*+t*}.**i+l-Al*#**ik rf ]3*Y}ri1'#*♦ Approach: North Bound Srnrrh anoY,rl East Bound West Bound Movement: 7, - '1' - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ .I ------------- ..._.II_ --------------- II--------------- II ------------- ._-I HCH Ops Adjusted Lane Oti.lizati.on Module: Lanes: 0 7. 0 1 0 1 0 0 7. 0 1 0 1 7, 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR I,TR L'PR L RT R'1' L RT RT L RT RT BLnslnGrps: 2 2 2 1 7. 1 1 2 1 1 --------- ...--I----...--II----------- .__--- II-------------- II -------------._-1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Modu7.e: Lane Width: 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 Crsswa7.kWid: 8 8 8 8 V Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 02 03 Os 08 Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < I < . < < , < < Other , . , > , . , > > > > , > > , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 F.xclusi.veRT: Include Incl. ude Inc7.ude Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II---------------- II--------------- II------._--- - HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 4 4 4 1 xxxx xsx:._ I xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx ------------ ;---------------- II --------------- li--------------- II -----------I HCM Ops Saturation Ad! Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 Bev Veh Adj: 1.00 :1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Parking Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 ..x>:x 1.00 1.00 xxsx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 ,x .x 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 AT Adj: 0.91 0.97. 0.91 xxxx O.85 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 LT Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 Sxxx xxxacx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx PedBike Adj: 1.O0 7..00 1.(70 1.00 1..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj; 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.98 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Sol Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < , < , , , , , , , , . < , No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > Signal. Type:c < < , . Actuated > > > > > > > > > > ; at AM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 10:46:40 Page 7.8 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alterative Intersection i48 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr 1*1int+*f-**f+#k3**-F*Aii'tY*fY-*n �11x+*#Ya11Y##*k k�lii ki*AI+�Y1iii-]t14�1*i,i+�-A-AA#f Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 't - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II------- --II--------------- --------------- Green/Cycle: --------II- Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.45 0.45 Arri.valType: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.2 0.2 0.3 2.3 3.5 3.5 4.1 2.8 2.8 0.7. 6.4 6.4 0pstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0pstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FarlyArrAdj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 02: 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.7 HCM214Queue: 0.7 0.4 0.7 2.7 4.2 4.2 4.7 3.0 3.0 0.4 /.l 7.1. - ------ --------------- -- - 701-h@.Factor: 1..20 1.20 1.20 1.1.9 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.18 HCM2k70thQ: 0.9 0.5 0.8 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.6 3.6 3.6 0.9 8.9 8.4 ------------- I--------------- II------------ ...__I____ II..__.________ --_._-I 85th?,Factor: 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.57 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.57 1.57 1_60 1.54 1.54 HCM2kII5thQ: 1.2 0.7 1.1 4.2 6.5 6.5 7.4 4.8 4.8 0.6 10.9 10.9 I--------------- ---_...._11---------------I- 90th8Factor: 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.75 1_72 1.72 1.72 1.74 1.74 1.79 1.68 1_68 HCM2k90thQ: 1.3 0.8 1.2 4.7 7.2 1.2 8.1. 5.3 5.3 0.7 11.9 11.9 ------------ I -------------- ...I I--------------- --- ---------I 95th@,Factor: 2.08 2..09 2.O8 2.02 1.98 1.98 1.96 2.07. 2.01 2.09 1.90 1.90 HCM2k95thQ: 1.6 0.9 7..4 5.4 8.3 8.3 9.3 6.1 6.1 0.8 13.5 13.5 --------------- II ---------------II ---------- II-------- ..----__I 98th8Facter: 2.64 2.67 2.65 2.52 2.42 2.42 2.39 2.49 2.49 2.67 2.28 2.28 HCM2k98th0: 2.0 1..2 1.8 6.7 10.1 10.1. 11.4 7.5 7.5 1.0 16.2 16.2 lratfl 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. T,i-tensed to VA CONSOL(TTNG, IRVINB Exst AM The For 31, 2015 10:96:90 Pape 18-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection Ne Stadium Way & Riverside Dr xs,s is r+sssa�Fsx+ssss+as>ex<ssa.s esaxrse sssa ss,r+++e.x+sxrrsssrasss xa+sass ,.n+s Approach: North Bound South Bound Cast Dound West Buuud Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R -. ----------- ---------------- II--------------- II.--------------- II------ ..._----___I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MFH 30 MPN 30 MPH NumOfStops: 1.7 0.2 2.9 20.7 0.2 31.9 36.6 97.2 0.1 1.2 96.2 13.3 ------------------------------------------------------------ ____--__-__.-__---__--_--__ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 90.332 pounds 6.539 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 1.25.835 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 9.579 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.698 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.961. pounds ________-___..____________________________.____-___-__-_-_.___--______-_ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 90.332 pounds 6.539 gallons Carbon Dioxi.de: 125.835 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 9.579 pounds Hydrocarbons: L 698 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.961 pounds ____--_-.___-___.____________________.-__--___--_--__.-__--__--__-___.__---__.__ DiSCLAIMBR The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signaltimings, geometric design alternatives or for genera]planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E--st PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 ].0:95:1"7 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario Command: Volume: Geometry: Lnpact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: East PM Defau.Lt Command Default Volume Default Geometry Default Impact Dce Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CM UL'PING, IRVINE B=at YM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 2-1 _-__.___-_____-__..__--_.__-___._____-_.____-_.____ Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service intersection Base Del/ V/ LOS Ven C it 1 Grand Ave 6. Machado St A 8.2 0.217. # 2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave B 10.9 0.055 it 3 SR 79/Riverside Or & Grand Ave F 959.0 1.969 If 9 Grand Ave & Macy St E 48.0 0.326 ff 5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr B 19.7 0.768 it 6 W Lakeshore Or & Riverside Or C 28.1 0.663 If 7 High School Entrance & Riversi A 9.8 0.328 It 8 Stadium Waq & Riverside Dr A 5.8 0.319 Future Change Del/ V/ in LOS Veh r A 88.2 0.251 r 0.000 V/C B 10.9 0.055 i- 0.000 D/V L h59.0 1.969 -t- 0.000 D/V B 98.0 0.326 + 0.000 D/V B 19.7 0.768 + 0.000 D/V C 28.1 0.663 + 0.000 D/V A 4.8 0.328 + 0.000 D/V A 5.8 0.312 + 0.000 D/V Traffic. 8.0.0"715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1RVINE st PM The Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 3 revel Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) }..i��.-kS+#y)A144*h1.�1lAJ**+1*�fi--k*AiY#�Y+-k+1AY***#*ziAflkF*ltii#l-#f r.**#A�h+x Intersection If Grand Ave & Machado St ......... Cycle (sec): 7.00 Critical Vol../Cap.(X): 0.251 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.2 Optimal. Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Street Name: Grand Ave Machado SC Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R -------- I ______ - 11 -'--- -- 1 1 --------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: ]Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 7. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------- _.-I ------- ------- 11.--------- ..----- 11--------------- 11 --------------- 1 Volume Module: Base Vol.: 7. 293 130 16 189 0 0 2 1 76 1. 25 Growth Adj: 1.00 L. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Initial Boo: I 293 130 16 189 0 0 1 76 1 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 Vxxx 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 22 130 16 189 0 0 2 1 76 1 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 22 130 16 189 0 0 2 1 76 7. 25 PCE Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M,LP Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 .__ 130 16 189 0 0 2 1 76 7. 25 ------------ 1--- ...----------- 11 ------- ._------- 11------------ ..-_-II- Saturation Plow Module: Adlustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.14 0.85 0.08 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 0.74 0.01 0.25 Final Sat.: 6 131 772 69 753 0 0 486 293 545 7 179 ---- I --- 11------- II ----II--------------- Capacity ----------Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.17 0.7.7 0.25 0.25 xmxr. axxx 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: AAA° k"I .A" A'" Delay/Veh: 7.6 7.6 7.6 8.7 8.7 0.0 0.0 7.6 7.6 8.3 8.3 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.U0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdiDel/Veh: 7.6 7.6 7.6 8.7 8.7 0.0 0.0 7.6 7.6 B.3 8.3 8.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A * A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.6 8.7 7.6 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj De).: 7.6 8.7 7.6 8.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvg Q: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7. 0.1 0.1 *++,,.. 14 f i.,,, 1. I a. 111, I I d I I I I I A I k I da rA,-F#.... f l S I I h.,f+ a t# I A„ A*.v]i..... r. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 'Praff1 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VIA CONSUT,TING, IRVINE Exst PIN Tue Mar 37., 2015 1.0:95:17 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative +Bis+.�xsa�+ray>+aaar.raa�xxa�ei.�e+ea,�i r�xxo-s,.,�,.exe�r ,a e++te+raxen.�xa..+xx-.n Intersection 141 Grand Ave & Machado St Approach: North Bound .South Bound East Bnnnd hest Round Movement: --------- I L ------ - IV R ...-------------------------- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R TimePeriod: 0.25 hour I_____-_ ---------- I---------------- ------------T.ime HevVeh: OR 0$ 0 0°s Alpha Value: 0.01 G.roupType: ---------------- 1 ---------------- I---------------- 1 I---- 1. -._----I 1 P[C.1]: 0.6536 0.7241 0.6989 0.6293 P[C2]: 0.211.9 0.1415 0.0829 0.0029 P[C3]: 0.1012 0.1121 0.2852 0.3270 P[C41: 0.0332 0.0223 0.0978 0.0411 P[C5]: 0.0001 0.0001 0.0052 0.0002 Padj[C11: 0.0051.4 0.00433 0.00908 0.00780 Padj[C2]: -0.00044 0.00015 0.00379 0.00407 Padj[C3]: -0.00270 -0.00314 -0.00767 -0.00940 Padj[C4]: -0.00199 -0.00134 -0.00462 -0.00247 Padj[C51: ----------- -0.00001. ---------------- -0.00001 ---------------- -0.00052 -0.00002 Lane: L1. I---------------- Li I__ L1 --...--------I Ll LaneType: ----------- LEETTHRURITE ---------------- LEB'P'PHRORITE LEP'1'THRORITE LEPTTHRURITE HeadwayAdj: -0.508 ---------------- ---- 0.016 ._------------ -0.200 __--._---__------ 0.002 Volume: 153 205 3 102 Capacity: 909 817 730 731. DegOfOtil: 0.16 0.24 0.00 0.13 Depl4eadway: 3.85 4.30 4.55 4.63 ServiceTime: 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.6 Delay: 7.6 8.7 7.6 8.3 Queue: ----------- ---------------- 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 Approach: ------ ...-------------------- north I---------------- Bound I---------------- South Round I-- East Bound ------- West Bound ApproachDeL 7.6 ------ ._--------- ----- 8.7 ----------- I____---- 7.6 ----I 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdi Del: 7.6 8.7 7.6 8.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A OverallDel: g,2 OverallLOS: A Traffic: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, TRVINE Exst L'M Tae Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 5-1 Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) .>..,a.,+s..,,,s.s.+...s..s....xs.s....aas...............+,+a+-+++,,.. lntersecti.on 42 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave . Y... F I I I I I I I I L. K.. n ,tiaA++.....1...X.1,,,..4+* 4,A t1......... ,A-r.,+aA Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B( 10.9] Stroet Name: Grand Ave Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II----------- --- ----II--------------- Control - -Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1. 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _._---------- -I -- ------------I- ---I I--------- ......---I Volume Module: 13ase Vol: 37 399 0 0 235 27 29 0 33 0 0 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 37 399 0 0 235 27 29 0 33 0 0 0 User Ad j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "i..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7._00 BHC' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.(70 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 37 399 0 0 235 27 29 0 33 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T'inalvolume: 37 399 0 0 235 27 29 0 33 0 0 0 ;___---_ II--------------- II--------------- II--- .____-___-__._.I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 'a'-: :..: .,.,. PoilowUpTim: ' " xxxx. xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ...•...x 3.5 9.0 3.3 axxc --- .--------- --------------- --------------- I--------------- 11--... ---------- ...- 1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 262 xxxx xxxxx ,xxa' xxxxx xxxxx 956 722 131 .::ix. xcC._„ Potent Cap.: 131.9 zxxx ::xxxx xxxx x.._..x xxxxx 539 356 901 ..ca,: - ...._._.. Move Ca 1319 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 527 396 901 Xx."' -"'"" Gap. ; xxxxx, x.,.,.. ....:.� �n.,.�n Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx: xxxx zxxx xxxx xxxx 0.06 0.00 0.09 a:zx.: x ...... ........ I--------------- II--------------- 11------------- .....-II_-----------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95th4: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx a, .x.11""1. Control ©e7.: 7.8 xx azo x xx_.x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ...-.,._. ...... xx.asx <. .�_, ., X., xR.,2I _ ...mak .� LOS by Move: A ' * s a ' ' ' • • ' Movement: LT - LTR - IT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Ca 'r"`x xxxxx xxxx - xxxxx xxxx 676 .,.:z ':...xx ' � xxh xT..{R ........ Shared9ueue:xxxxxos' xxxxx xxxx.;: xxxx xxxxx o Y, x c x 0.3 -,-,; xx x :....: ,,.._, Shrd ConDel:xxx:{x �-"4x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.9 s"'FF` .. ., `.... `. Shared LOS: I ., . a a . ` a 13 ApproachDel: .. ..c .,..xx:: .. xxx 10.9 ApproachLOS: ` ' B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ..a,r,.,..+a.......s..,........a....a..,...s..aax....>.s r. ,.....ra.,......+x,.x. Tteffix £.0.0'115 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE GRSC PM rue Mar 37., 2015 10:95:17 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 IfCM Onsignalized Method Base volume Alternative Traffi:: 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dow].].ng Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINL. Intersection #2 Grand Ave G Riverside Ave +...x. xxx..,tia+...xx.......a �.......... Apprnanh: North Bound South Bound Cast DOu,J WesL Bound Movement: --- ...------- I L - T - R ---------------- L - T - R ---------------- L - 'P - R L - T - R HevVeh: 011; I 01111 ------------- ._-I 0, ----------- ..---- OR Grade: 0`.> 011, 09. 01; Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 1.2 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hoar Traffi:: 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dow].].ng Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINL. East PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 ].0:55:17 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalixed Method (Baso Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR 75/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: ![959.0] +*ti\Yt2 i-+MYA***}*A-Sli{t#*t**Al-i#i'**-kl�,+ski*+,11M'k%'1'x A�aAS*k#+tt+t li#�AAk*Y1* Street Name: SR 79/Riverside D,r Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - '1' - R L - T - R 'L - T - R L - 'P - R ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II -....--------------I Control: Uncontro.l. led Uncontrol. 1. ed Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- II ---___.----____-II------- II Volume Module: Base Vol: 311 861 0 0 512 119 66 0 200 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 317 861 0 0 51.2 119 66 0 200 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 317 861. 0 0 512 119 66 0 200 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 31.7 861 0 0 512 17.9 66 0 200 0 0 0 ---I--- II ---------------II -----II- Critical Gap Module: Critical. Gp: 5.1 xxx:c,..,...x. ,,Xxx xxxxx 6.5 6.5 6.2 xxxIx xxxx. xxxxx Foll.owUp'1im: 2.2 xxxx r.,,ox.,. xxxx.,d ti...... 3.5 i.0 3.3 xxxxx :,xx . xxxxx --------------------------- II------- _------- II.----------- _--- II ---_____--__---I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 637. xxxx: osX,,a xxxx ....- 2067 2061 572 z:xxx zxxx Potent. Cap.: 961 xxxx xxxxx seen x;ucax: 61 55 529 ,.....s Move Cap.. 961 xxxx xxxxx xxxx.: ..,.n.. xxxxx 15 37 525 xxxx xxxe ::xxxx Vc1nine /Cap: 0.33 x.....- xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1.96 0.00 0.38 xxx, x ------------ I --------------- 11----------- ....--- 11--------------- II -__-----____.-..._1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx: x,,:x,,:x x;- s*Xxx, xxxxx. xxxx "exxx Control. Del: 10.6 x,,,xx ..ti,,,,,. xcxx.c. xoxx ..x :..,,, ,..:-_u.., x,.xxx ........ .......... LOS by Move: A " " ' I k " ' ° ' ' ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxxx: ,..... . .. ......-....,., * _: xxxx ,:x,:. ...... �* Cn .inn .�.�.�n-..._.� x x ,...n SharedQueue:xxxx.x xxxx xxxxx xxx= xxxxx xxax:x 20.2 "`..._`. Shrd COnDel: xxxxx xxxx -,xxxx xxxx... x X X -,axxx 45Q "' x .,. xxxxx xxxx xxx:'- .Snared LOS: " * ' ' ` * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx 959.0 .........,.. ApproachLOS: ` ' F xxr+is+w++++Karma.+xt+<ia-r+.e,+xa�+amet�<e,.+sexa xxx+ar++��xwx�,+s.,, ,.�+xearaears Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. a=,x „1>x<f,mm+11111*e.a .++ a,.... xmae,eax<1x,11,.eaaae ,+aa, .x>+,.x raaaaa snaaaa Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, LRVINE Post PM Too Mar 31, 2015 10:45:17 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Traifla 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOL'PTNG, 1RVJNP intersection 113 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave 1lppronch: North Bound SuuLli Bound Hast Bound West Bound Movement: _-----...---- I L - 1' - R L - T - R L ----------------- ---------------- - T - R L - T - R HevVeh: I I ---------------- a 08 I-------- 08 ..._------I 0, Grade: oE,, 01d 02 0111,. Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: q.00 feet/sec Lanewidth: 1.2 feet 12 feet 12 feet ].2 feet Ti.me Period: 0.25 hour Traifla 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOL'PTNG, 1RVJNP Etat PM Tue Mar 31, 207.5 10:45:7.7 Page 9-] Level OP Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsignal.itod Method (Base Volume Alternative) ++.,xx4aea 4r+r,rxen.a44 ,r�w44 ,a+xn_44+ r+.�+++m, ,.,a.xx�+aaa .e.>, .+4rxx44} „ xnaA .,Intersection 4l Grand Ave G Macy St x4.+a4r444aa,�x4++�+r4A, F44xx++.�r,x+a�+r „ wx4�a x4a44xa xa Fne�+44iilu)AAxF#44444 Average De.l.ay (sec/veh): _.3 Worst Case Level. Of Service: E[ 98.0] Street Name: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: Noi-th Bound South Bound east Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ .I. --------------- II--------------- II ----------- ....--- II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 -------- I -------------- ...!I --------------- 11 ------------- l ------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 33 1171 0 �r 609 50 18 0 26 0 0 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial. Ise: 33 7.171 0 2 609 50 18 0 26 0 0 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHI- Volume: 33 1171 0 _r 609 50 18 0 26 0 0 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina7.Volume: 33 1111 0 2 609 50 1.8 0 26 0 C 3 ------------------- II------------ ...--II --------------- II - Critical. Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 .,-... xxso, 7.1. 6.5 6.2 esxxx xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 .,..,. 2.2 ;...a.. ..xxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3-3 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- -------- II -------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 659 xx.c:i x.:.-.,.. 1.171 x...... 1852 1850 609 ..xxx 1171. Potent Cap.: 939 xxxx xxxxx 604 xxx, x_-,.... 58 75 499 -xxxx xxxx 237 Move Cap.: 939 xxxx xy:xxx 604 xxx:i ..xxxx 55 72 499 xxxx xxxx 237 Volume/Cap: 0.04 xxxx .,xxx 0.00 x.,.,-. .-..:... 0.33 0.00 0.05 xxxx x.-.... 0.01 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II.--------------- II -------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 -xxxx ... xxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx :....,..x 0_ xxxx xz:acx ........ ........ Control Del: _.0 xxs s:.: k' -x v .'".,. a xxxx 1.1.0 ...,. r: ,.- .... •,. -r 1Z.6 t:xxxx xxxx 20.4 LOS by Move: A 4 • B ' - -... .._,,.." -..�' B 4 C Movement: LT - LTR - R'P LT - LTR - R'1' LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxi: xxx.,: xxx:rx xxxx xxx;: - 55 ._x.,,:x xxxxx xxxx teas xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 .-...-, xxxx xxx:xxx 7..2 xxxx xxxx:~ xxxx xxxx xa::-:xx Y, }.:.nn x.,a Shrd ConDel: 9.0 "',x ,xxxx 7.1..0 "�:ru xxxxs 99.2 xzxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A _...,..�, B '-- . F . , 4 4 , ApproachDel: ............ sseNX-- 48.0 20.9 ApproachLOS: " ' P C 441#t**f***Fi11A 4+�-# i'Yku 4*k+AA-1*#ftiiAAY*i +4fiY� ♦4***1 Fi kki**+is-N1fu*}i:Xi**+i* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. iki 4+4444*4,,,+444*ti��rAf#e++i1AY4M%4���Y4S+41-.+i +444 k,b#44*444i�#44+4x}i443* TrafEix 8.0-0715 (c) 2.008 Dowling Assoc. ,Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East PM The Mar 31, 2015 10:45:17 Page 10-1 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative !«a„ I # I I I I I I I....# ,l **e.A..ii#IIIAliiIcI# I I I I I, I I I I I I I I . . . . . . . . . . i,. *...... �A Intersection A4 Grand Ave & Macy St ........i i. Approach: North Bound South Rrnmri East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R --------- ...-I ------------- ._--I L - T - R L - T - R L - - R ---------------- I ---------------- I_ -_--------_...--I Grade: 0"„ 0".; 011" 011,: Peds/(lour; 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk .Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour 'Praffi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINE Exst PM 1'ue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 11-1 i,evel Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) .. „ u..+...v...r............ +1.......l..r......................x..111.....1,... Intersection 115 lJ"Coln St V Riverside Dr -k.*Yf 1.i1.#illi llti.f'.Y111#s*..Ai i+.A*#i +i lA....... k.. A................ ,........ Cycle (sec:): 00 Critical Vol-/Cap.(G): 0.768 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.7 Optimal Cycle: 12 Level Of erv.ce B ........... 1.111.1111..++1111..-....11.1.1 Street Name: Lincoln, St Riverside Or Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R L - T - R _ -------- ------ ------------ ---------------- --------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i i. 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ I ---------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- Volume __j_---____-----_-jj__------_.._--__11-_---_--_--____11_---- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 230 0 77 109 891 0 0 65B 235 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 230 0 77 109 891 0 0 658 235 User Ad]: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRE Volume: 0 0 0 230 0 77 7.09 891 0 0 658 235 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: U 0 0 230 0 77 109 891 0 0 658 235 PCE Ad]: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLE Adj: 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 230 0 77 109 891 0 0 658 235 ------------ j---------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II Saturati.on Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1-00 1.00 7_00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 7..00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 ,Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.26 Final. Sat.: 0 0 0 1326 0 999 7.805 1900 0 0 1350 482 ------------ I ---------------- II-.--------------II--___----__-_--II- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.06 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.49 Cr7.t Moves: 1kl 1*.1 •��� Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.08 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 Volume/Cap: 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0-00 0.77 0.77 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 Uni.form Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.2 0.0 36.2 45.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 13.0 13.0 IncremntDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 8.7 21.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 Inil-Qucunel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.00 0.00 7..00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 99.9 67.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 16.1 16.7. User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel, /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 0.0 44.9 67.1 8.9 0.0 A.o 16.1. 16.1 LOS by Move: A A A D A D E A A A B B HCM2hAagQ: 0 0 0 11 0 ll 5 15 0 0 21 Jl k*1.........- I I . . . . . . . . . 1..... I1. k***.l IIIA *.'A .....n. k+,rllAf >AA. rl.... .. .A Note: Queue reported is the n:mber of cars per lane. Traf,f,ix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 12-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 1.....k..1..x...................... rrr.1...-...........+. Intersection #5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr ..1.....1..a........0 .................................. ............... ........ .. Approach: Nnrfh Rn,nd South Bound Last Dound WusL Bound Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I -------- .------- 11--------------- II ---------------- II_______________I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1. 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Group: Y,F.x}, xxxx xxxx LTR LTR LTR L 'P -;x xxxx RT RT V,11SInGrps: 0 0 0 7. 1 1 ]. 1 0 0 1 1 ------------ I -------- ..------- 1I--------------- II--------------- II -_.__--_____-___I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ,Lane Wi.dth: 12. 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: B 8 8 8 8 Hev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0-I pg 08 011, Parking/Hr: No No No NO Bus S'tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < <c < < , < < < < < < < Other , > > > > > > > > > , > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 Ex clusiveRT: Include Include l:nclude Include 8 RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ ---------------- II--------- _.----- II---------------- II__ -_____--____-1 NCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 9 xxxx 9 11, 11.1,x1.1, ,- .,.. .,xxx r:xxx __I --------------- 11 ----------- _____II--- ._------------ II--------------- I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: xxxx xx:,,x xxxxx 1.00 x....., 1.00 1.00 1.00 x, x.xx „ xxxx :I.. 00 1..00 . Y,- .x Hev Veh Adj: xxxx xxxx xxrax 1..00 z:x.:x 1.00 1.00 1.00 ::11axx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx:xxx 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxxx -,�-,,. sons 1.00 x...... 1.00 xxxx 1.00 :,,xxxx xxxx 1..00 ]..00 ., v.- -, -,._ Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx CO z:x>:x 1.00 xxxx 1..00 xxxxx xxxx 1-00 1.00 Area Adj : xxxx xxxx Xenon 1.00 x_..... 1.00 1.00 1.00 x.,Xxx xxxx; 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx -rxxox 0.97 xxxx 0.97 xxxx xxxx x...,..x xxxx 0.96 0.96 LT Adj: xxxx xxxx x - .... xxx 0.96 x 0.96 0.95 x.,.... xxa,x, x�. :xxxx PedBik1...,e Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 xxx xxxx x 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCH Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 Osr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 MLP Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phi Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 ------------ I--------------- II----------------- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Cocrdi.naLed: < < < < , c < < < < < < No , , . . . > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated< > . , . > > > > > > > > > < De1.Adj Fctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1-111£.#£.....1....-. 4. ...£#..lit..*...Y1A4................. T'raffi.x 8.0.0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINE Gast PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:1'7 Paye 12-2 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Qucue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative xwx �, ewix,xx� „+-xx �.0„aex�a+xax++rxaa++eae+xial+<r+r,ryr..a xa>+a,e,-+-aaa+.+�+x Intersection -0)5 Lincoln St 9 Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'T - R L - 'T - R ._..._........_.___.___--------------- II --------------- II--------------- II -_-____---_---_I Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 6.00 0.23 0.08 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Arr iva lT ype: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 3.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 17.7 7.7.7 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Far_lyArrAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.7 2.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 11CM2KQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 10.7 5.7, 15.2 0.0 0.0 20.7 2 0. 7 __________--------------- I._ --------------II - 11 --------------- 7 70 th,Fa ctor: 1.20 7_20 1.20 7..18 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.16 HCM2k70thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 12.6 6.1 17.7 0.0 0.0 29.0 29.0 ------------ --------------- --------------- II_..._-.________._.__II_.__._._......._._............_...I 85thFactor: 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.51 1.60 1.51 1.55 1.98 1.60 1.60 1.95 1.95 HCM2k85thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 0.0 16.1 8.0 22.5 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- . 11__.._________-_-I 90thHFactor: 1.80 1.80 I.BO 1.63 1.80 7..63 :1.77. 1.59 7..80 1.80 1.59 1.59 HCM2k90thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7.9 0.0 17.9 8.8 29.1 0.0 0.0 31.9 31.9 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- I 95th" actor: 2.10 2.10 2.10 1.83 2.10 J, .83 1.95 1.76 2.1.0 2.10 1.69 1.69 HC172k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 0.0 19.5 10.0 26.7 0.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 ------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II_______________ 11 - - - - -I 98th°,Factor. 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.19 2.70 2.19 2.37 2.01 2.70 2.70 1.90 1.90 14CM2k98thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 22.8 12.2 30.5 0.0 0.0 39.9 39.9 Traffin 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINF. Exst PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 12-3 Fuel. Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I i I a a s i t k 43 I l I I l l I I, I I IIIA,IIIIIsIAIIkkIlIApIIIII I k I k+{+ I A l i n l l+# 11 I I i, A d A 1, A, A, Intersection 145 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr �x.�t�I+«+earr<a �we+, u.xase++�4.Ak+x�Aaia�ev.xA+I�Arwx+s.a+a++xxix FA 2wm�+>�+a+> Approach: North Bound South Bound Eact Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R L - 'P - R ------------ I ------ ._..-------II --------------- II --------------- II_____----------! Ruu Speed: 30 MPH 30 mrii 30 MPH 30 MPLI NumOfStops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 0.0 18.0 26.7 120 0.0 0.0 117 41.8 ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 56.886 pounds 9.216 gallons Carbon Drox i.de: 177.484 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 13.533 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.330 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.657 pounds --------------- .-_---------___.-----------__...---------_-_______-_------------___._-- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Euel Consumption: 56.886 pounds 9.216 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 177.484 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 13.533 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.330 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.657 pounds --------------------._---------____------------___._-------------_______---------- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning appli.caCions, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a singtc intersection withi.n the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffix $.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINI; St PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:45:17 Page 1.3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) .,,,.......I.,...........+. ....... ........... A. Intersection Jl6 W Lakeshore Dr k Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./Cap.(x): 0.663 ],ass Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.1 Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of e is C I I I I x I I. I I s,+ r a.........A #t... l+nYflxl .Y.). .......-1##,....k-kN Street Name: W Lakeshore- Dr Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'I - R -------- ...------ II--------------- II---------------- II___-- Cont101 Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y; -R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: ]. 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ I ----II_____.---___---_II.__------'._------II----- Volume Module: Base Vol: 201 336 23 198 229 171 166 698 266 31 572 313 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Set: 201 336 23 198 229 171 166 696 266 31 572 313 user Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 PHF Volume: 201 336 23 198 229 11 166 698 266 31 572 313 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 207, 336 23 198 229 171 166 698 266 31 572 31.3 PCE Ajj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 LinalVolume: 201 336 23 198 229 171 166 698 266 31 572 313 ---------------II --------------- II--------------- II---- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1960 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1 0 Final Sat.: 1.805 3345 229 1805 3610 1615 7.805 3610 1615 1.805 1900 1615 ------------ I --------------- II------- ...------- 11--------------- II--- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.09 0.79 0.16 0.02 0.30 0.19 Crit Moves: *... " .. Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.7.6 0.16 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.40 0.66 0.66 0.36 0.30 0.36 0.66 0.43 Uniform Del: 39.0 39.5 39.5 38.6 37.7 39.5 40.9 12.9 12.4 46.1 27..3 18.5 IncremntDel: 5.4 2.5 2.5 4.5 0.5 6.4 6.5 0.1 0.2 2.5 2.0 0.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.4 42.1 42.1 43.1 38.2 45.8 47.4 13.0 12.6 48.6 23.3 18.9 user De1.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.4 42.1 42.1 43.7. 38.2 45.8 47.4 13.0 12.6 48.6 23.3 18.9 LOS by Move: D D D D D D D B B D C B HC111'kAv9Q_: 7 7 7 7 4 6 6 b 4 i. 14 7 „ ,I,...,III.............=e.a,,, ....., I ,.,,.,.,..I+..++.. ,.,,...........I. .,.,.a Note: Queue reported is the number o£ cars per 1 u. Praffi.- 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc_ LiCeused to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E-st PM 'fuc Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page Iq-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative e...xxa...x.,.xw.a...;..s....a+.+f.x. ................a...,u .......x.n Intersect].on 116 W Lakeshore Dr s Riverside Dr ..... " " , ".... ..h14. ....... ..a................. ,.x -ea -a. Apprn»rh- North Bound South Bound EasL Bound West Bound Movo-ment: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R .______._----- I ---------------- 11--------------- HCM Ops Adjusted Lane nt'.1illtion Module: .Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R 'P R L iLns LiGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 _ 1 1 � 1 ----- ....----- -_.__--____--___11 --------------- II------------ .__ _� HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Jane Width: L2 12 12 1 12 l., CrsswalV_Wid: 8 g 8 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0"c OY, 011 0`> parking/Hr: No No No No Bus .Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < , , < < Other . > > > , . , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0� Ex ClnulveRT: Include Include Include include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 -__.. --------- .--------------- II---------------- HCM Ops f(IL) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 1 x.,.,,. xxxx 1 xxxx: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 =X.. ........ ------------ I. ----- ...--------- II ---------------- II--------------- II ---------- ___--I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wd Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: X,,s 1.00 1.00 xxxx x.,nr. 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 ":xx x xxxx 1.00 Bus Ste Adj: sxxa 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00.. 1.00 ,xx xxx,. Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: .. x x 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 .._xx , .., 0.85 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 ;cs xx x gxx L'edBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L OG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 B'nl Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 ------------ --------------- I1 --------------- II ---------------- 11___--____--___-I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < , < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: . , < . < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > . DelAdj Fctr.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Trafiix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSUL„TING, IRVINE East PM Tue Mar. 31, 2015 10:4:4:17 Page 14-2 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report (11CM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative i-*1A11*k4}'*Ill *1x i+iAA 4*?*xiifl)iNktx..�+l**+*��,AIAAAAIi%YL**-A-AAA*#ki#Mf )AAAAi Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'r - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------- li-_.------------- II---- ----------- II__ --_---___-_-_I Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.16 0.7.6 0.17 0.16 0.7.6 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.95 0.45 Arrrval'rype: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor: 1..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..60 Q1: 5.2 4.9 4.9 5.1 3.0 4.5 4.4 5.8 4.0 0.8 12.4 5.9 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Earl.yArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 q2: '.L7 1.6 1.6 1..6 0.6 1.7 1.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.9 0.7 HCM21KQueue: 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.7 3.6 6.2 6.1 6.3 4.5 1.3 14.3 6.6 ------------ I--------------- II_-_ __-_II------ li -I 70th.,Factor: 1.1.8 1.18 1.18 i.18 1..19 1.i9 1.19 1.1.9 1.19 1.20 1.17 1.18 HCM2k'70thQ: 8.2 7.7 '7.7 8.0 4.3 7.3 7.2 7.5 5.3 1.6 16.7 7.8 ------------ I--------------- II__-_-__..__-____II____--_-__-_._-_II-- 85th'Factor: 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 7..57 1.54 1.55 1.54 1.56 1.59 1.49 1.54 HCM2k85thQ: 10.7 10.0 7.0.0 10.4 5.7 9.5 9.4 9.7 7.0 2.1. 21.2 10.2 --------- --- - --- ---- l 90th8Factor: 1.68 1..69 1.69 1.69 1.73 1.69 1.70 1.69 1..72 1.77 1.60 1.69 HCM21,90thQ: 11.7 11.0 11.0 11.3 6.3 10.4 10.3 10.7 7.7 2.4 22.8 11.2 .------------ I-------- _II _. _.___-II--------------- II_______________I 95th2Factor: 1.91 1.92 1.92 1.91 1.99 1.93 1.93 1.92 1..97 2.06 1.77 1.92 HCM2k95thQ: 13.3 12.5 12.5 12.9 7.3 11.9 11.7 12.1 8.8 2.8 25.3 12.7 ------------ I------------- _._II ------------- ..__II____ li 98th=s Factor: 2.29 2.31 2.31 2.30 2.46 2.32 2.33 2.32 2.41 2.60 2.03 2.30 HCM2k98thQ: 15.9 15.0 15.0 1.5.4 9.0 14.3 1.4.1 14.66 10.8 3.5 29.1 15.2 'rraffis 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowliny Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSO'LTlHG, IRVINE E::st PM The Her 31, 2015 10:45:17 Paoe 14-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I + I All III II A I * A k ....... x.... Af","p=............11i/................ nA11�%1AAA Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside pr. AAit*z........... 1111111111-11111,k ## ii 1F1*ii+al-[*4-*t al lAi k:1}-E+a-Xi# App,'oach: North Bound South Pound EayL euw,d West Bound Movement: L- 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ------------ ...__II_______________11_----___---__.-_II--___----_____-I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPN 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 57.1 78.8 5.5 46.1 51.4 90.2 39.4 98.6 36.3 "/.5 112 53.0 _____---_._______________________________________.___--______---_..__---______----.__ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 102.205 pounds 16.557 gallons Carbon Di.oxide: 318.878 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 25.126 pounds Hydrocarbons: 4.583 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.155 pounds ___________________________________..._--______--____---_____---________.-___---_._ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 102.205 pounds 16.557 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 318.878 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 25.126 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.583 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.155 pounds ------- .------------------------------- _--------------------------------- -----____-- DISCLA W,R' The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a si.nq_le intersection within the CCG and 'PRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East 111\1 Too Mar 31, 201:3 10:45:17 Page 15-1 Leve]. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 47 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F I k I#, A i 4 t I , ) I 1 A I I k II I} L a 13 a l b 111 k I I I # k . I k i# M t f i i L A I S d_A., 1 �k d_ka Cycle (sec): 7.00 Critical Vol_/Cap.(X): 0.326 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.8 Optimal Cycle: Level Of Service: A **A1 kay 4*1#i��)ik+**-111 k*�Ykf�Y l�-1-ki-*i.l-4Y!**t*3iAlAT++*i1YfH}ik1#ii'M14*%*1�c*]#* Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - I - R 1. - 'P - R L - T - R ---- I ------------- ..._II --------------- II--------------- II__ -.__-_--______I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 :1 1 0 ------------! _......-- ---II--------------- II------------ ._--II--------------- Volume ---Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 0 9 27 0 17 13 948 3 11 666 24 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. ese: 3 0 9 27 0 17 13 948 3 11 666 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1 0 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Volume: 3 0 9 27 0 7.7 13 948 3 11 666 24 Deduct VOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 0 9 27 0 17 7.3 948 3 11 666 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 MLF Ad3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ft nal Go l ume: 3 0 9 27 0 17 13 948 3 11 666 24 ------------ __...._----------- II--------------- II--------------- II____ -________--I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.II9 1..00 0.89 0.92 1..00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.25 0.00 0.75 0.61 0.00 0.39 '1..00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1..93 0.01 Fi.na7. Sat.: 422 0 1.266 1072 0 675 1805 3599 11. 1805 3467 125 ------------ I._._.__._ ---------- II--------------- II--- .__---------- II_____ -_----__--I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol./Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: "11 11' I'll I'll Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.79 0.79 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.24 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.24 Uniform Del: 48.2 0.0 48.2 43.7 0.0 43.7 47.4 2.6 2.6 4B.5 2.7 2.7 IncremntDel: 5.2 0.0 5.2 1.4 0.0 1.4 2.4 0.1 0.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 7..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 53.4 0.0 53.4 45.2 0.0 45.2 49.8 2.7 2.7 54.1 2.7 2.7 User DelAdj: ,1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 AdjDe.l/Veh: 53.4 0.0 53.4 45.2 0.0 45.2 49.8 2.7 2.7 54.1 2.7 2.7 ,LOS by Move: D A D D A D D A A D A A HCM2kAvoQ: I 0 1 _ 0 2 7. 4 4 1 3 3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffic. 8.0.0715 (u) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE nest PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 16-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative .+rags.+sxsrrrxrrrsxa +srr+.�<„ sssrrrair.11xx�,r+ a+axsl..,mrwr+xea,xraeas>�+ar Intersection #7 High School. Entrance & Riverside Dr #}1r1A i-k*M1triAf kz*+#*}iriAf S -k Afi�A3'f-F; \1ii*rYh r'#A-1111*+x)i [f rikr-+t11k1*#t}r YT ifA Approach: North Lound SuuLL Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- I --------------- II --------------- II ---- ......---------- II-------- --I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Uti.iization Module: Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L Be RT I. RT RT #LnslnGrps: 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--- ...----------- II --------------- HCH Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 Crs.swalkW.id: 8 8 © 8 i; Hev Veh: 6 0 0 0 Grade: Ok 011, 08 0 l Parking/Hr: No No No No Pus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other � i, . : > > > > . > , > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include k RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-------- HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 9 xxxx 9 9 xxxx. 9 1 xxxx .,.,xrx 1 xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------- II-------- ._----- HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Rev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 a....., 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ,_,xxx, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 ...,s, 1.00 1.00 orex 1.00 1..00 Bus Sip Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 x_.,.,. 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.90 xxxx 0.90 0.95 aeon 0.95 xxxx 1.00 1.00 nxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx. xxxxx xxxx xx-x PedHike Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ------------ --------------- II ------ ...-------- II--------------- ;I--------------- Delay ---------Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < , , No . , > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < , < < < < < < < < Actuated > . . > > . , , , > De1Adj Fctr: 1..00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 ssssf+saraw.arlx+xarasrrrsx s -x rrriraa++.,,Fr+ssssal Frxrrsarn+srsssaa,<ms+sssrsmw+ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East PM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 1.0:45:17 Page 16-2 ,Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative rx.rxe+.+e.+r...+erxfie�.wax«ai.,xa a+axx,ae.�x+r-�<+�«xaa+yaaa�.er�ae,�+xe, ,.n,x Intersection 147 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Sound West Bound Movement: I, - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ---------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11-__..__..__._--__.-__I Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.80 0.80 0.02 0.79 0.79 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ;..00 7..00 01: 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.9 3.7 3.7 0.3 1.6 2.6 Opst,reamvc: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 11CM21<011eue: 0.B 0.0 0.8 1._6 0.0 1.6 0.7 4.2 4.2 0.7 2.9 2.9 1--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- I 70thf,Pactor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 HCM2k70thQ: 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.8 5.0 5.0 0.9 3.5 3.5 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 85th°,Factor: 1.59 1.60 1..59 1.58 1.60 1.58 1..59 1.56 1.56 i.59 1.57 1.57 IICM2kB5thQ: 1.2 0.0 1.2 2.6 0.0 2.6 1.0 6.6 6.6 1.2 4.6 4.6 --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II --------------- I 90th','Factor: 1.79 1.80 1.79 1.77 1.80 1.77 1.79 1.72 1.72 1.79 1.75 1.75 IICM2 k90thQ: 1.4 0.0 1.4 2.9 0.0 2.9 1.2 '7.3 "7.3 1.3 5.1 5.1 ------- .........I --------------- 11--------------- 11-------------- .. _.I I......_____________I 95th8C'actor: 2.08 2.10 2.08 2.05 2.10 2.05 2.08 1.97 1.97 2.08 2.01 2.01 HCM2 k95thQ: 1.6 0.0 1.6 3.3 0.0 3.3 1.4 8.3 8.3 1.5 5.9 5.9 ---------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 98th3Factor: 2.64 2.'70 2.64 2.58 2.70 2.58 2.65 2.42 2.42 2.65 2.50 2.50 HCM21.98thQ: 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.2 0.0 4.2 1.7 10.2 7.0.2 1.9 7.3 7.3 'Fra ffi.:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSUL'11NC, IRVINE Gast PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 16-3 Lucl Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Ineersection if/ High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West hours Movement: 1, T - R L - T - R h - T - R L - T - R ---------- _._--------------- Run .Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.7 0.0 2.2 6.9 0.0 4.0 3.2 63.9 0.2 2.7 42.9 1.5 -_... -------------------- ...__-----_________----__-_-_-------___________-- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 29.697 pounds 4.007. gallons Carbon Dioxide: 77.056 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 3.105 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.669 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.278 pounds --__....-------------------...___-----_________----_______------____-.____________.-._ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 24.697 pounds 4.001 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 77.056 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.105 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.669 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.278 pounds ---------------------------------------_---_________----____.______-----_____.___--- DTSCLAIMER The fuelconsumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal. timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFPIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffi.x 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E>:st PM Toe Mar 31, 201.5 10:45:11 Page 17-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 NCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) intersection #8 Stadium Way t Riverside Ur +.1,1e111111 „ a.+v..1 a x...z. „11+..m.1.... .+ .+.,.1e... x.1.x+.+.1...+.. .. t.x+x. Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol ./Cap.(S): 0.314 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): S.8 Optimal. Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A a*i+Al-*�'*4t#Y.3*.**1+A*.ff+*Y'.k*♦1k**IiiiY.. i.141-k)#i.i1Ai Y};t*#YIFt.**#3 Al k.A� Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside DI: Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _... ---------- I--------------- I--------------- I--------------- ...-I ------ ------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YIR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1. 1 0 ------- ...---- I II--------- ._----- II ._.____--- ____.I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 0 9 36 0 31. 32 927 2 10 623 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: 3 0 9 36 0 31 32 927 _ 10 623 48 User Adj_: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 0 9 36 0 31 32 921 ,' 10 623 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 0 9 36 0 31. 32 927 2 10 623 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ML[' Aug: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 3 0 9 36 0 31 32 927 2 10 623 48 ---------- 1--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1..99 0.01, 1.00 1.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 1584 0 1584 1805 0 1615 1805 3602 8 1805 3315 255 ------ 1 --------------- 11--------------- II-------- ------ II --_____________I Capacity Analysis Module: vol/Saf: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: "111 I'll Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.82 0.02 0.77 0.77 Volume/Cap: 0.26 0.00 0.31 0.31. 0.00 0.26 0.25 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.25 0.25 Uniform Del: 49.4 0.0 48.5 44.7 0.0 43.7 43.8 2.2 2.2 48.5 3.4 3.4 IncremntDel: 2.9 0.0 4.7 1.6 0.0 1.1. 1.0 0.1. 0.1 5.6 0.0 0.0 InitQueu Del.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 52.3 0.0 53.1 46.3 0.0 44.8 44.8 2.2 .. 54.1 3.4 3.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.0C 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 52.3 0.0 53.1 46.3 0.0 44.8 44.8 2.2 2.2 54.1 3.4 3.4 LOS by Move: D A D U A D D A A D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 0 7 1 4 4 1 3 3 Note. Queue reported is the number of cats per lane. .+iitiil.+}AY11A ......... 4f* -k A11rt.+k#11x1 hf'*{1111Yiz�1 A.Y.AY :`. .AAAA Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst PM Tic Mar 31, 2015 10:45:17 Page 18 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection {48 Stadium Way e Riverside Dr ,+xa+zm++e, A',........ ++ieaa.�crxs „ rax x -n Approach: North Lound South Buund hast Sound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1, R ------------- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II__ -_______.._____I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module - La i i e, a,, : odule:Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1, 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 one Group: LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT 41insInGrps: 2 - 2 1 1 1 11 2 ------------- ---------------- II --------------- II________ -_____.-II ---------- ._----- I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 1.', 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 11ev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ Oa Ofl Oli ParRilu/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > ; . , > > Cnft Ped/Hr: U 0 0 0 Exclus i ve RT: Include Include Include Include 'e RT Prtct:0 0 0 0 _----------- --------------- II --------------- II_______________II---------------- ; HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 9 xxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx ..xxx ------------- I. --------------- II ------------------ II___________.____II._______________I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1_00 xxxx 1..00 1..00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 ::xxa: 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1..00 xxxx 1..00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 x.c- 1.06 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx: 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 RI' Adj: 0.89 xxxx 0.89 xxxx; xxxx: 0.85 xxxx 1..00 1.00 ,.xxx 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: 0.99 :xxxx 0.99 0.95 xxxx xx,.xx 0.95 xxxx xxax 0.95 xxxx x- d'SFX PedBlke Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 .1.00 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.99 Osr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fn1. Sat Adj: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.99 ---------- ..._I _____II Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > , , > , Signal Type: < < < < < < , < < < < < Actuated . > > 11 , > . DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 :1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Traffix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1:RVINIB Ezst PM Tue Mar 37., 2015 10:45:1.7 Page 18-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 1)8 Stadium Way E Riverside Dr +1111111111111,, .......... ............. i.*i1Y�Yf** 11k*k1Y.XXY A�YI�AA*#AY i'*�k Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------I ---------- ---------------- I ---------------I Green/Cyc1e: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.82 0.02 0.77 0.77 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 3.3 3.3 0.3 2.8 2.8 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 HMTQueue: 0.4 0.0 0.7 1.4 0.0 1.2 1.2 3.7 3.7 0.7 3.2 3.2 ------------ I--------------- II------- ------- II--------------- II 70th8Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 7..20 1.20 1.20 1_19 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 HCM2k70thQ: 0.4 0.0 0.8 i.7 0.0 1.4 1.4 4.4 4.4 0.8 3.8 3.8 ------------ __._------------ II----------- ....---- II--------------- II----- 85th4.Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.59 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.59 1.56 1.56 1.59 1.57 1.57 HCM2kB5thQ: 0.6 0.0 1.0 2.2 0.0 1.8 7..8 5.8 5.8 1.1 4.9 4.9 ------------I---- ---------- II----------- ..._-II --------------- 11 --------------- I 90th8Factor: 7..79 1.80 1.79 1.77 1.80 ]..78 1.78 1.73 1.73 1.79 1.74 1.74 HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 0.0 1.2 2.5 0.0 2.0 2.7. 6.5 6.5 1.2 5.5 5.5 -----------I- --I-.______________I I--------------- 11----...--I 95th8B'actor: 2.09 2.10 2.08 2.06 2.10 2.06 2.06 1.99 1.99 2.08 2.00 2.00 HCM2k95thQ: 0-8 0.0 1.4 2.9 0.0 2.4 2.4 7.4 7.4 1.4 6.3 6.3 ------------ I--------------- II ------ 11. ----------- 11_______________I 98th"Factor: 2.67 2.70 2.65 2.60 2.70 2.62 2.61 2.45 2.45 2.65 2.48 2.48 HCM2k98thQ: 1.0 0.0 1.7 3.6 0.0 3.0 3.0 9.2 9.2 1.8 7.8 7.8 Traffic; 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:95:17 Page 18-g Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative nf.l\k111111111',.iii......Art*#*1+-A.Illi......rlk**+iiiL AI-A-*£AiYi ,AA+#1Y+�A AA Intersection 148 Stadium Way & Riverside or ApprnaCh: North Bound South Lound East Bound WesL BUWId Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- II --------------- II... -------------- II --------------- Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.7 0.01 8.6 0.0 7.3 7.6 56.0 0.1 2.5 99.9 3.S ------------------------------------------------------- .----------- _-----_____----___.-- Name: year 1995.composite f1eeL Fuel Consumption: 25.950 pounds 4.204 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 80.965 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.455 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.745 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.291 pounds ------------------------------------------------------------- ._-----_-__.---_-_-__. Name: year 2000 composite fleet Euel Consumption: 225.950 pounds 9.204 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 80.965 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.455 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.795 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.291. pounds --------------------------------------------------------...----------- .-_----____--- DTSCLAIMF.R The .fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or .for general planning applications, as those calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFPIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. P,- affil. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East+Amb+project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:05 Scenario Report Scenario: Exst+limb+Project AM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Pee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Default Command Default Volume Default Geometry Default Impact Pee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration Page 1-1 -------------- T affil- R.0.0'715 (c) 20013 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTTNG, IRVINE E::st+Amb+Project AM Tue Mar 37., 2015 10:29:06 Page 2-1 __...______________ Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Del./ V/ LOS Vol, C If I Crand Ave & Machado It A 9.9 0.409 It 2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave e 1.2.6 0.111 If 3 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave C 27..3 0.503 N 4 Grand Ave & Macy St A 4.1 0.62.2 If 5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr D 38.7 0.973 ik 6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside or C 25.4 0.559 E 7 High School Entrance E. Riversi B 15.9 0.512 If 8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr 6 18.9 0.430 Puture Change Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C A 9.4 0.904 + 0.000 V/C B 12.6 0.111 + 0.000 D/V C 21.3 0.503 + 0.000 D/V A 4.1 0.622 + 0.000 D/V D 38.7 0.9/3 + 0.000 D/V C 25.4 0.559 + 0.000 D/V B 7.5.9 0.512 + 0.000 D/V B 18.9 0.430 : 0.000 D/V Traf.fia 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dos(li ng Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVIND E>:st+Ainb-iP,roject AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection it! Grand Ave & Machado St Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol./Cap.(Z): 0.404 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4 Optemel Cycle. 0 level Of Service A w+aaye,ax.x-x rraame++aaia a+xex+a+++xsn�i��x+r+rae+� saa,�rrx.raa�.�F++e i.e.,�.ane Street Name: Grand Ave Machado ,St Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- 1 --------------- --------------- 1--------------- I ----- Contiol: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: l,nclude Include Tncludo Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 l! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------- I --------------- il--------------- II----- --------- II_----_ Volume Module: Base Vol: 302 84 99 225 21 _ 94 1 26 o � Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Initial Bee: 11 0 1 302 84 99 225 1 � 94 1 26 � User Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 r_....._ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 27 84 99 225 2 2 1 2 94 1 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 27 84 99 225 2 1 94 1 26 GCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fi.nalVolume:27 84 99 225 2 2 1 2 94 1 26 ._______________^...---------- jj--------------- II--------------- 11----- ____I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.02 0.24 0.74 0.30 0.69 0.01 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.78 0.01 0.21 Final Sat.: 15 204 623 245 557 5 271 135 271 536 6 148 ------------ I_. -------------- II-_-_ --------------- --------------- ---- i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.1.3 0.13 0.13 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: "°"` I'll 111+ Delay/Veh: 7.7 7.7 7.7 10.2 1.0.2 1.0.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.8 8.8 8.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 j..00 1.00 AdjDel./Veh: 7.7 7.7 7.7 10.2 10.2 10.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.8 8.8 8.8 LOS by Move: A A A B B B A A A A A A Approach Del: 1.7 10.2 7.9 8.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 App rAdj De l: 7.7 10.2 7.9 8.8 LOS by Appr: A B A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1. 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2_ 0.2 0.- , , 4 . . . . . . , A , , A . . . . . . . . . - I I I I I .2iko,1Xiif,A,,A.i.a1kd..J#it2-k+4.1Y-IIIII ,♦.# 8* Y 1 Y 11, v 3. 11 ..1, 1. 1 At Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ## malaII- I I I I 1 I II I I I I I I I I, I I I I i, A k i}ll, li+trk3-A „ I l i t I I, a Y I l k d i},,, 1I I II I I ail. Traffi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. L;:-censed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Ambi Project AM The Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative .>+.,............. .z.x.,r........................ ..,.x.>-. Intersection i[1 Grand Ave & Machado St Approach: ninrPh Rcund South Bound East Dound West- Bound Movement: __.... -------- I L - T - R ----------------- L - T - R ---------------- L - T - R L - T - R Time Period: 0.25 hour I---------------- HevVeh: Alpha Value: 0.01 ----------- Group'Pype: ----- _.---------- 1 .._______________---------------- 1 I________________I 7, 1 P[C17: 0.50 0.72 0.44 0.52 P[C2]: 0.33 0.11 0.09 0.00 P[C3]: 0.10 0.15 0.35 0.42 PIC41: 0.07 0.02 0.17. 0.05 P[C5]: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Padj[C1]: 0.007 0.005 0.012 0.010 Padj[C2]: -0.003 0.001 0.005 0.005 Padj[C3]: -0.002 -0.004 --0.009 -0.012 Padj[C4]: -0.00d -0.001 -0.007 -0.003 Padj lC57: ----------- -0.000 ---------------- -0.000 ---------------- -0.001 -0.000 Lane: L1 ---------------- Ll I_______________. Ll -I Ll. LaneType: ----------- LEFTTHRURITE ---------------- LEFTTHRURITE ---------------- LEFTTHRURITE LEFTTHRORITE HeadwayAdj: -0.441 ---------------- 0.057 I__ -0.160 -____________-.I 0.026 Volume: 113 326 5 121 Capacity: 842 806 676 690 DegOfUtil: 0.13 0.40 0.01. 0.16 DepHeadway: 4.7.1 4.38 4.84 4.87 ServiceTime: 2.1 2.4 2.8 2 9 Delay: 7.7 10.2 7.9 8.8 Queue: ---------- _..---------------- 0.1 -._____.-_________---------------- 0.6 0.0 0,2 Approach: North Bound ,South Bound ---------- I____ East Bound --______.-___I West Bound ApproachDel.: 7.7 ...----- ---------------- 10.2 I________________I 7.9 8.g Delay Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 ApprAdj Del: 7.7 10.2 7.9 8.8 LOS by Appr: A B A A Overa].l.Del: 9.4 OverallLOS: A 'Praffi:i 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRV7:NE it>eAmbi-Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 5-1 Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) » <eaaa.111x ,......a -a ...... A .aa arw ............... .naxx intersection ill Grand Ave & Riverside Ave Baa, u.x+++aa„acno-+xxara�++.warrrma a,�,xx. a*,+. a�rxe>+aa „ xfaaaaar+.xxa,iTe rr:� Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.7 Worst Case 1Sevel Of Service: B[ 12.61 Street Name: Grand Ave Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T' - R ------------ I--------------- II --_______.......____11________._._____11____ Control.: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Scop Sign SLOP Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 U 0 ll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------I--------------- ----------- ...I------------ ...--I---------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 20 240 0 0 419 34 :51 0 43 0 0 0 Growth Ad]: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial BOO: 20 240 0 0 919 34 51 0 93 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..60 PHF Ail: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 20 240 0 0 41.9 34 51 0 93 0 0 0 Deduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVol.ume: 20 290 0 0 419 34 51 0 43 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- ...I I_______________II II____._ ---_______I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxA - xxx xxrX 6.8 6.5 6.9 -..,.-a xxxx ,ixs,,:x FollowOpTim: ,,.zxx ....n_... _,x: .a 3.5 4.0 3.3 cx-,: x ,.xxxx ------------ 1--------------- II---------------- II--------------- II._...._____________I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 453 xxxx xxxxx x}:xx %xxr, ""�':�x 556 716 227 xxxx �.Xxxx s. _ter_., xx_�._ �.... Potent Cap.: 1118 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxXX. sy, X Z a 466 358 783 xxxx xxxr. xxxxx Move Cap.: 1118 xxxx xxxxx _..._.x xxx:z xx=X 959 352 183 xxxx xaza xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx ._xz:x x};x z:x s 0.1) 0.00 0.05 xxxx ------------ I --------------- jj-_________._.____11_______..--_____11______....._______1 Level. Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxxx xxxx ._:,,.. sx,xx xxXx x..,.., `�"X xxa,: xxxx .•...'X xxxxx xxxxx xxx xc-xxx COn'L Y01 De X};X}: hi;xY,x `"'-' LOS by Move: A * " a' I "' ' I ' ' . « Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 7;T - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx x=a x xxxx x};};}:}: .:HXX „..XrX :-_xxx XXXX X%.._... .,._.._... a:,:x.. _..,.,_. X66 _..�.�... ....,�.. SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxxx xxxx -,xXx 0.6 :..,,. axxx xxxxx Surd GOnDel:xxxxx xxxx :.:xxxx xx*a xx x,:xx xxxxx 12.6 ........ XxY,s}: xxxx - . ...,., n+..,.. XxnlF. ._nhI. i. .,.. o.? n.u. Shared LOS: * ` ` k * " ' B ` 1 ` a ApproachDel: x_ax -•,v.c:X 12.6 ApproachLOS: * '- B ` 1ST#1Y}'Y***aAF*#*t3:##AA**M}af A*#Y+#-***ltatix**-AA11A*k%'X}laAY1**#il k�***1*iIIAAAA Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffic 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA COHSULTTNG, IRVINE Esst+Amb+Project AM Tue Mar 31, ?015 10:29:06 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM [7nsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative o.iiVAI+ x I f x+ x l . . . . . . . , , , , 14 1 f R I]i l l z i i i x,, A r i..... a,) I I I I I z i, a i x t i f. i x i,n,I l.ntersecti.on 142 Grand Ave 8 Riverside Ave ##aAi l,ilx#Aafo�i#+fii yii}.dxiiiA.ddiiii+ilhi+}tial**iii Arrlx#*i iiti.AAAAAi... Approach: North Lound South Dound EeaL Bound (Nest (sound Movement: ----------- I ---------------- L - 'P - R L, - 'P - R I ---------------- T - T - R 1, - T - R HevVeh: 01E I 03 —-------- -_I----------------I 011, 01 - KCu.ade: Cu. ade: 01, o€, ms 0€ Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 9.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour 'I'rafffir. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOL'PING. IRVINE Gxst+Amb+Project AM Tue Mar 37., 2015 10:29:06 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection N3 SR 74/Riverside Dr s Grand Ave *3r�11A*i*f+trek****i A�Ae k#**rear tf-#in 1YA14-F+*-A}fk*R*AYti1aAYA--A-A--A A3A l+* -A -h .i l*ff'A Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.503 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.3 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: C «sirkere-�++,k,r kx rre+x++rr+enrr,kxee�+rrreemswsee,e+rra.,rws re x+++. +�++axszkrene Stree'[ Name: SR 74/Riverside Dr Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound Movement.: L - T - R L - T - R L - '1' - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II------ ...-------- II--------------- II--------------- Control: _--__---_-----ControL Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: 1'ncIude Include include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 � 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ ---------------- II...--------------- II--- .._....----- -II --------------- Volume ---------Volume Module: Base Vol: 177 589 0 0 679 78 161 0 302 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1.77 589 0 0 679 78 16i 0 302 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Volume: 177 589 0 0 679 78 161 0 302 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 177 589 0 0 679 78 161 0 302 0 0 0 PCF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..Of) 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1.77 589 n 0 679 78 161 0 302 D 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- .II--------------- II_______.._ -------I Saturation ['low Module: Sat/Lane: 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 7..00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 .1..00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ilinal Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3610 1615 3502 0 1.615 0 0 0 ------------ I ------------- ...-II -------------- ...-II --------------- II_______ -_.-----_I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.1.0 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: e,e,. I -I I'll Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.13 0.12 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 35.9 11.1 0.0 0.0 24.2 20.6 20.7 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDe.t: 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 TnitQueu Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 37.1 11.2 0.0 0.0 24.5 20.7 20.7 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 37.1 1.1..2 0.0 0.0 24.5 20.7 20.7 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D B A A C C C A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 _ 0 0 1 .. 0 7 0 U 0 rer kkkrF++x,,,.. _.:.e ...,ke, k+a ., � k,..kkkr xr xxkekexxast+rrs++ra-ee „ „ ne x+e,exxx Note: Queue reported is the number of cams per lane. **rlarif*s+AAr Y*#'+i ka+a kiia...Y ki r -k .tea ii**i A11AfAA+eAA{}}�tilrLii}1r 1r nAA Traf£i_: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSUi.TING, IRVINE FxBt+Amb+Project AM T'ue Mar 31, 201.5 10:29:06 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative �.ax.��swazaaae ,�xw>tian�a x+.xae a��sxe xxxA,.>+x.,x-ur+xee .,. aaexxfi��.�A�,a,:.+x+a+� Intersection #3 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Approach: North Bouud SuuLh Found Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - '1' - R 1. - T - R ._ ----------_I ---------- ...---- II --------------- II --------------- II-- ------I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: L T xxxx xxxsc T R h xxxx R xi' -;XL' x...,.. xxxx 4LnsInGrps: 1. 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- i! ------------ -- --------------- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 .12 Crsswalkelid: 8 8 8 8 Hee Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: OF OR 03: 0111 Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other , > > , , > > > Cn.ft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 GxclusiveRT: Include Includo Include Include RT Prtot 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II --------- ..----- II ---------II---------------I HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx, xx-,<x xxx:: 1 xxxx ;:xxx xxxx: xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- II --------- ...----- II--------------- II -_......-----------I HCH Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ,,;:xa 1.00 1.00 1.00 nxx"v 1.00 _xxa xxxx xxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 -r_zxx 7..00 ........ ......x xxxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 t:xxx 1.00 h.._._. _,xxx xxxxx Parking Adj: xxxx .1.00 xxxxx xxxx xxxx1.00 ,,,,n,. 1.00 _,n.... axxx xxxxx Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx ease xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1..00 x L x xaz xxxxx Area Adj: 1..00 1.00 xxxax xxxx 1.00 1.00 - a,,I. ., xY,nx-,x".-x 1.00 xsrx 1.00 .,.,,,r ��,�a. �_.,,..,. R'1' Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.85 xxxx xzxx xxxxx LT Adj: 0.95 ease xxxxx,x xxx0.95 xxxZ l:axx x ,,,.. PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 L 00 1.00 1.00 1_0() 1.00 100 1.00 11CM Sat Adj: 0.95 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 1.00 1..00 1.00 der Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1_00 I.00 1.0d ]..00 Fill Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > , , , > > > > > > > > > Signal. Type: < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > . . , > > > > > > De1Adj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Efst+Amb-HPloject AM Eau Mar 37., 2015 10:29:06 Page 8 Level OL Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative. Intersection 113 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: Ti - T - R L - 'T - R L - T - R T, - T - R ------------ I.------------- ..._II-__-__--_-.__-__II---------------II----- Green/Cycle: 0.1.9 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arrival.7'ype: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ql: 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 7.7 1.4 1.5 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02: 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM2KQueue: b.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 8.6 1.6 1.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------- ____I__... ----- II---------------- II--------------- II---------- .___--I 70th"Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.20 1_20 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.18 1..20 1.20 1.20 HCM2 k7 othQ: 6.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 10.2 1.9 2.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 ----------- li---------------- II--------------- II 85th";Factor: 1.55 1.56 1.60 1.60 1.52 1.58 1.58 1.60 1.53 1.60 160 1..60 HCM2k85thQ: 8.3 7.5 0.0 0.0 13.2 2.5 '21.6 0.0 11.5 0-0 0.0 0.0 ------------ .---- .._---__--_-II --------------- II--------------- II - 90th -'.,Factor: 1.71 1.71 1.80 1.80 1.66 1.77 1.77 1.80 7..68 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k90thQ: 9.i 8.3 0.0 0.0 1.9.9 2.8 2.9 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------- j----- ...--------- jj--------------- II--------------- II-- 95th8.Factor: 1. 95 1.96 2.10 2.10 1.87 2.05 2.05 2.10 1.90 2.10 2-10 2.10 HCM2k95th Q: 10.4 9.5 0.0 0.0 1.6.2 3.2 3.4 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------- _---- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-__-- 98th�,Factor: 2.36 2.39 2.70 2.70 2.21 2-59 2.58 2.70 2.26 2 70 2.70 2.70 HCM21:98thQ: 12.7 L1.6 0.0 0.0 19.:1. 4.1 4.3 0.0 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 C�affia 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLPZMC, IRVINE ExSLiAmbl Project AM Tue For 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 8--3 ______._____.______.-___________...____________.______.______. Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 SR 79/Riverside Dr & Crand Ave +x.......wx.xi>..,k++r x-ossa.....+xx>s+ Approach: Nnr-;-h anund South Bound Gast Dound West Bowed Movement: L - T - R L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ....__--------------- II --------------- II ----- ...--------- I I__._____________I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numofstops: 39.5 75.9 0.0 0.0 131 72.8 26.5 0.0 58.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Name: year 7.995 composite fleet Nuel. Consumption: 53.501 pounds 8.667 gallons Carbon Dioa:ide: 7.66.922 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 7.2.820 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.238 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.619 pounds ----------------- ___._------------------------------------------------------------ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 53.501 pounds 8.667 gatIOns Carbon Dioxide: 166.922 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 12.820 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.238 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.619 pounds DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives of for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appfopra.ate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traf£i.x 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, I!2VTNE -tjAmb+Project AM Tue Mar 31., 2015 10:29:06 Paye 9 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Xi♦tt a.Yk*2+kYi+lk**t YYY1x**t*1-!#>i+**Y}#iYY***i 4eY li Ax-k11AiaXi-1.+-A 11ii#�i. _)A111AA Intersection $4 Grand Ave & Macy St Cycle (sec): 60 Critical. Vol./Cap. w 0.622 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.L Oftimal Cycle 37 Level. Of Service: A Street Name: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ._.----------- ---------------- -__---____------_-_---_-_._...__--- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Grcen: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YI-R: 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 t 1 0 0 0 0 ----------- --- -------------- - Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 689 0 0 961 30 30 0 54 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bsc: 9 689 0 0 961 30 30 0 54 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 689 0 0 961, 30 30 0 54 1 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 689 0 0 961 30 30 0 54 1 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLGAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVol.ume: 9 689 0 0 961 30 30 0 59 1 0 0 ------ I--------------- II---------------II--II------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1..00 0.85 1..00 L00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 24 1.860 0 0 1900 1615 1900 0 1615 1900 0 0 - ----- ----- -- ------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: I'll ++.+ Green/Cycle: 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.62 0.01 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1 27.3 0.0 27.8 26.9 0-0 0.0 IncrcmntDel: 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.6 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 28.9 0.0 41.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 User Dellolj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 28.9 0.0 41.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A C A D C A A 11CM2hAvgQ: 9 4 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 In" IIx .............. I,I S> I, d l Y I I - IIIIIIIIk+I A #. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per Lane. Traffic 8.0.0'715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, TRVINL Exst+Amb+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 10-1. ------------------ ------------------ _----------------------------------- ______-.____ Leve]. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 114 Grand Ave & Macy St *pita**f: *i}+111F*taixXlk#*k Rka a2#t#*tai*f***+aY�l'***a**atAali#*Y +A111y.#-A Aa X'#i_a. Approach: North Sound 3ouLh Buuud Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11 --------------- II__----- ------11----------- HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1, 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: LT LT ._... ,` . LT LT R IT LT R L xxxx ��xAXx NLnsInGrps: 1 1. 0 1, 1 1 1 :L 1. 1 0 0 ____I_______________II______-_____---II__---- -----II---- ------ HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWi.d: 8 8 8 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 011 011 0"; 0" Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < v Other , > > > > > > > , . > , > > Craft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Re Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ ------- ._------- II--------------- II.--------------- II___ ----------I HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 5 5 .,,,..., xxxx xxxx 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx ------------ I ------- _------- I ---------------- HCM Ops Saturation /1dj Module: Ln Wid 'Adj : 1.00 1.00 :;xrza ,.xa:x 1.00 1..00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Lev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xrx: n: x: x:; 1.00 1.00 L. OU x':>s '1 1..00 x>:xr. xxxxx Grade Act: 1..00 1.00 ::xr .._ xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1..00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx x,,ssx Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 :c.._.,._, xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx': Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 x.,..,,.. ._xxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 x:':xx xxxxx RT Ad -j: xxxx x.,..., xxxxx txxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx, xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx LT Adj: 0.99 0.99xxx xz: xx""X xx,=.x xxxx:, 1.00 xxxx xxxxx :1.00 xxxx xxxxx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ent Sat Adj: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1..00 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < , ' < < < < < < < No > . > > > > , , > > > > Signal 'Type: < < < 1- < < < � << < Actuated > . > , ; > > > , , , , DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 Traffix 8.0.0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE &is'LiAmb+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:'9:06 Page 10-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #4 Grand Ave & Macy St ?I a s**tt*#IIII+*II# 11 I I i I I I I I I I, I I 111 i,, 11613x6 i 1A III IIi e++i Y}*l1Ak1YS#t}ir41nA Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: 60 60 60 Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 98.78 _...., e.,., 3.22 3.22 Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 48.78 saxa;.x 3.22 3.22 Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 48.78 sashxs:: 3.22 3.22 Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 1 ,,.......... 0 1 Number Of Lanes Ln Lane Group, N: 1 ._.,..._.... 1 ]. Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, V.1t: 9 ....x:;xs 30 1 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.01 X.......... 1.00 1.00 Proportion of Left 'Turns in Opp Flow, P1to: 'ns -:1, :-:'+.rsxs 1.00 _•X -_XXX Left Turns Per. Cycle, LTC: 0.15 .-..._._... 0.50 0.02 Adjusted Opposing Floor Rate, Vo: 961. .,.HX.':x 0 30 Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Vole: ].6.02.._,......., 0.00 0.50 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Roo: 1.00 .._......... 1.00 1.00 Lost Time Per Phase, t1: 4.00 .,,.._._._., 9.00 9.00 Eff grn until arrival. of left -turn car, g,f: 33.58 .._x.. .., 0.00 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, Pro: O.I19 xxsx>:x 0.95 0.95 Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 8.86 _....,..._x 0.00 0.00 Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 15.20 ..X_..H_. 3.22 3.22 Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: ............ ............ 0.00 xxxxaz Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: ...,_....,_ ...,.....,.. 0.00 xaxxax Left -turn Saturation Factor, fs: 0.27 ,,._................... 0.86 Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, 1A 0.01 _.._.. X a X 1.00 1.00 Through -car Equivalents, e17.: 3.58 _....,,,... 1.40 1.35 Single Lane Through -car Equivalents, e12: ..,....,,.X .,..,.:.,,,, 1.00X .,....._ .... Mi.ni.mum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, f min: 0.04 ..., Xxxx 1.24 1.24 Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.99 ..,,_.n 1.00 1.00 Left Turn Adjustment Factor, f.1t: 0.99 .,......,.,. 1.00 1.00 3n���+ex�.e++a1.1lxx«r, a11k1+6 ir3l+�+xea.ee,x+i-A,1ln'39n6r „ .++xsi,aa „ Ae-�,r�sx+ Traffi_x 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Vit CONSOI,TING, IRVINE East+Amb i -Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 10-3 Level Of Service Detai.led Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternat.i.ve .....er .. .. „ ��, e. +..>....+-a ..x.................. .......... Intersection Ik4 Grand Ave & Macy St .IIIIIIkII . 1.. 1.....t...].*. k, Y 1. I.M.... a............ -......#..a Approach: North Dound SuuLLi Buuud East Lound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------- II --------------- II --------------- II--------------- Green/Cycle: _____----- -Green/Cycle: O.81 0.87, 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Arrival'1ype: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ups treamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyAsrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Q2: 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.9 0.0 1..3 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM2KQucue: 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.7. 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ ----- ._--------- II--------------- il--------------- II -.______---- --I 70th",Factor- 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.18 7..20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.20 7..20 HCM2k70thQ: 5.1 5.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.1 1.1 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------- ------ _-------- II---------------- II...-------------- II -.______--_._____I 85th','Factor: 1.56 1.56 1..60 1.60 1.53 1.60 1..59 1.60 1.58 1.60 1.60 1.60 HCM2k85thQ: 6.1 6.7 0.0 0.0 1.1_8 0.2 1.9 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 _...._---------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I I....______ ------I 90th'.Factor: 1.72 1..72 1.80 1.80 1.67 1.80 1.78 1.80 1.76 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k90thQ: 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.2 1.6 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II.---------------- I I..._____ ---_._____I 95thRFactor.: 1.97 1..97 2.10 2.10 1.89 2.10 2.07 2.10 2.03 2.10 2.10 2.10 HCM2k95thQ: 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.9.5 0.2 1.8 0.0 4.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 ------------ -...------------- II--------------- .I I--------------- II----- ...--..._I 981-11`]Factor: 2.42 2.42 2.70 2.70 2.25 2.69 2.63 2.70 2.55 2.70 2.70 2.70 11CM21:98thQ: 10.4 10.4 0.0 0.0 17.3 0.3 2.3 0.0 5.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVING, st+Amb+Project AM Tus Mar 31, 201.5 10:29:06 Page 10-9 E'uel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 149 Grand AV, a Macy St_ ,a,xax.......>«..x,xx Approach: North Bound ,South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: T - R L - T- R 1, - T - R L - T - R ____I_ ____________II___.____________I I-_-_ ___II________ --_...___I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOPStops: 0.7 57._2 0.0 0.0 90.9 1.9 '7.2 0.0 13.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: year: 1995 composite fleet. Fuel Consumption: 29.985 pounds 9.098 gallons Carbon Dioz:i.de: 77.952 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.7.09 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.638 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.293 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 21.985 pounds 9.098 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 77.952 pounds Carbon Hon'side: 5.109 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.638 pounds Nitrogen OHides: 0.293 pounds DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for generalplanning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIY. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 4raffix 8.0.071" (c( 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRV7:NE Fxst+A:nb+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 11-1 Leve]. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) IAI.........a.s.e.......+w++.,x............cn«..x.e....... .... e.....,..........ax. Intersect.i.on 115 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr x...a...z..xm>......x ....+......x...........+...... +z.e.-,rAr xxw.a..,x.a sk+mea Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.973 1'nss Tim, (sec): 6 Average Delay (seu/veh): 38.7 Optimal Cycle 116 Leve] Of Service: D .. k„ +.x....... zx. u..a.x+.+........ax»+..... .. x..... k...x.n..+.x.......n..<. Street Name: Lincoln St Riversi.de Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R h - T - R ____ _______ 11 --------------- 11_______________I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 9.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------- I --------------- II--------------- II ------------- .__11-__.___________._I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 383 0 290 172 766 0 0 680 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 383 0 290 172 766 0 0 680 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 383 0 290 172 766 0 0 680 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 383 0 290 112 766 0 0 680 Co PCF, Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 n 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final.Volume: 0 0 0 383 0 290 172 766 0 0 680 60 ------------ --------------- II --------------- 11--- _------- ...--- II_______..________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.43 1..00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.08 Fina] Sat.: 0 0 0 990 0 750 1905 1900 U 0 1127 152 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 Crit Moves: *..* .+.. ,..W Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 Uniform Del.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 17.8 27.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 17.5 17.5 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 27.6 59.6 5.0 0.0 0.0 26.1 26.1 1111.t QueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 45.3 86.6 17.4 0.0 0.0 43.6 43.6 User De1Adj: 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdiDel/veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 95.3 86.6 1.7.4 0.0 0.0 43.6 43.6 LOS by Move: A A A D A D F B A A b 1) HCM IAvgQ. 0 0 0 1.9 0 19 7 14 0 0 21 21 ..r. u . ......��..... xr.. ......�...r.x...,.. ....a, .. x..a .. ung ....,.n.., 2a. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E:?sb4Amh-project AM 'tue Mar 31., 2015 10:29:06 Page 12-1 I,evei Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection its Li.ncolil SC 6 Riverside BY x�aa.l++x«+,�,.� xes.�.++r.x=xa+taxa, z+�a,�.n++«♦eaia.+wx .afi+ss«+ar++,rxna,t�.�,aA Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - '1' - R --------I- --------------- I------------ ------------._I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Ot,ilieation Module: Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 () P O 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Groop: ......,. LTR LTR LTR L T xxxx RT RT 41msInGrps: �0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 ------ ---I---------11----------I HCM Ops Input .Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 Orsswal i:Wid: 8 B 8 B 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0; 0`3 03 08 Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area 'Type: < , < < . . c Other . . > . . , > >, Cnft Fed/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Exclusi. veRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ---------- I--------------- II II---II---------------I HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(1.t) Case: ...,,,.. xx,:x xxxx 4 x:=, 1xxx xxxx ...xx ......,. ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------ ._--------- II--------------- I IICM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: ' "', 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xx:<xx xxxx 1.00 1.00 tisn., xxxx .. ,.>.,, xxxx Hev Veh Ad'axXx xxxx H xx,rte. 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: xx,:x aXxs a:xxxx 1.00 s...,., 7..00 1.00 1.00 ".xxxx .;..,,x 1.00 1.00 Parking_ Adj: - x., 1.00 1.00 x x x n 1.00 xxxxx xx a :I.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj : _... ,..._.. ax 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx_,: xnxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: oxx1: ::xxx:=. 1.00 sx".-x 1.00 1.00 1.00 ssxxa 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx ,.xxxx 0.99 :. so. x 0.99 xxss oxxx ,.xxxx xxxx 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: --v'+" ... .:. ,"'.xx 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.95 xxxx xxxx,: xxxx sxxx -....,...' ...n nf..{ � x..c, n...nnn pedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 IiCM Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 0.92 1..00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1_00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 MLP Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.. 00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pal .Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 ----- I I-_--------- 1 1-------- I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: : < - < < < <. < < - No > , > > > > . . > , > >, .Signal Type - - � a < Actuated > > > - - > > > - - - - DelAdjFctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 **lfia axis 3#1i..1-F*#*i kt�ix**i-11nx kYkv11i lA*-h-F*#lka a'*{*+f lllxx*i. #Trill*1-'.-A-A \A4Ak 1rafiix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc:. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Ambi-Project AM The Mar 31, 2015 7.0:29:06 Page 12 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (IICH2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative V: ii14#**k#a%-nk]13............ Intersection Ik5 Lincoln St 6 Riverside Dr Apprnarh: North Bund South Bound I, act 2ound Wcst Bound Movement: 1, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ...___---__--.- I--------- I I--------------- I I_-._-------- -------- Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.90 0.10 O.W 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Ql: 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 2.9 10.6 0.0 0.0 12.1 12.1 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1-00 1..00 02: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 8.1. 4.4 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.4 8.4 HCM2KQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 i9.1 7.2 19.2 0.0 0.0 20.5 20.5 ------------ '--------------- II------------ ...--II ----- ...--_____- II-.-_--------'--- 70th%Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.20 1-16 1.18 1.7.7 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.1.6 HCM2k70thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 0.0 22.2 8.5 16.6 0.0 0.0 23.8 23.8 ------------ --------------- II------------ II--------------- ---------- ---- I 85th'.Factot: 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.46 1.60 1..96 1.54 1.99 1.60 1.60 1.45 1.45 HCM2k85thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 27.9 11.1 21.1 0.0 0.0 29.8 29.8 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- ..._-- 90thoFactor: 7..80 1.80 1.80 1.55 1.80 1.55 1.68 1.60 1.80 1.80 1.54 1..59 HCH2k90thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 29.7 12.1 22.6 0.0 0.0 31.7 31.7 ------------ --------------- II--------- ._----- II--- .....----------- II__--------- 95thRFactor: 2.10 2.10 2.10 1..71. 2-10 1..71 1.90 1..77 2.10 2.10 1.69 1.69 HCM2k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.6 0.0 32.6 13.7 25.1 0.0 0.0 34.8 34-8 ------------ ----------------- II--------------- II--------------- II__ -----------I 98th�cFactor: 2.70 2.70 2.70 1.93 2.70 1.93 2.27 2.04 2.70 2.70 1.91 1.91 JICM2k98thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.9 0.0 36.9 16.4 28.9 0.0 0.0 39.2 39.2 'fraff.ix 8.0.0715 (c) 2.008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE, ExctiAmbi-Project AM 'rue Mar 37., 2015 10:29:06 Page 12-3 ------------------------------- Fuel. Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operati.ons Method Base Volume Alternative intersection -05 Lincoln St ti Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ,, - T - R --------------- 11 11_______________11--------------- 11 ------------ ._.__1 Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MI -11 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.1 0.0 '71.2 92.9 160 0.0 0.0 167 19.7 ______________________________________________________.__ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 93.3:1.9 pounds 1S.11'7 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 291.139 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 23.591 pounds Hydrocarbons: 9.967 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.097 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 93.319 pounds 15.117 galIons Carbon Dioxide: 291.139 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 23.591 pounds Hydrocarbons: 9.967 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.097 pounds ------------------------------------------------------- ._._____________________..._ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single inte.r,scction within the CCG and TRAFFIY. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffi-,i 8.0.0/16 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CON.SOLTING, IRVINE E;:bt+Amb IProject AM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 13-1 Level Of .Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) }ftAfY kf t+Yf+1000 *l1 „ L****4-1♦IIt#i+�n�#tltt*ia#**1**tii lY*fi_iiAiA#fA4A-1i 1�Ai. Intersection 116 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol./Cap.(Y): 0.559 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (eoc/vch): 25.4 Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: C Street Name: W Lakeshore Dr Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound WessC Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I_______________ ;I --------------- 11 ------------- II_______________I Control.: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Liclude Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YI-R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 _ 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 185 187 8 225 252 104 127 630 316 21 516 136 Growth Ad!: 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 181 187 8 225 252 104 127 630 3.7.6 21, 5.7.6 7.36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP' Volume: 18 187 8 225 2.52 104 127 630 37.6 27, 516 7.36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7.85 187 8 225 252 104 127 630 316 21 516 136 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 185 187 8 225 252 104 127 630 316 21 516 136 ------------ ____.__.......-......-___II --------------- II--------------- II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3991 197 1805 3610 167.5 1.805 3610 1.615 1805 1,900 16.15 ------------ I. --- ...__._-_-_____II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.17 0.20 0.01, 0.27 0.08 Grit Moves: ".;, 111 *"** '*'* Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.58 0.58 0.03 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.56 0.52 0.56 0.30 0.34 0.39 0.56 0.17 Uniform Del: 37.2 43.4 43.4 35.2 41.2 40.9 41.7. 10.8 11.1 97.2 18.1 19.9 IncremntDe.l.: 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.6 2.3 3.1 0.1 0.2 3.2 0.8 0.1 InitQueuDel 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 7..00 1..00 7..00 Delay/Veh: 39.3 46.0 46.0 37.9 42.1 43.2 99.2 10.9 11.3 50.9 18.9 14.5 Oscr DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 39.3 46.0 46.0 37.9 42.7 43.2 99.2 10.9 11.3 50.4 18.9 14.5 LOS by Move: D D D D D D D B B D B B HCM2 Y,Avg4: 6 9 9 7 5 4 4 .; 5 1 11 2 HCM2P vgQ: Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. *f1A1+iF#*SA.1A1-Fi.++�Y11a li.-k*r1:.��#*i#A1iai14*4i#1iL4*kY#++F}tk**Yai#Yl-Y'i3F*t**A Traffic; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st+Amb-iProject AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.0:29:06 Page 19-1 Level Of Service Detailod Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection jf6 W Lakeshore Dr L Riverside Dr ...............+.. ........... Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bomid West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R T, - T - R L- T - R ------ II -- ------II----- II HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L 'P R L T R J, T R ikLnslnGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1 ------------ I --------------- 11______------ 11-__________.--- II__ HCM Ops Input SaCuration Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 .12 12 1.2 J.2 1.2 l;' ].'. 1Z 12 12 Crsswal.kWid: 8 8 8 8 Bev Sell: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 03 OT OR 0° Parking/Hr: he No No No Bus SLP/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < � < << < c Othei - - : > > , , , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Czclusive RT; Include Include Include .Tnclude a RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ---------- ..._I --------------- I 1.____ II ____.__-II----_ 11CM She f(It) Adj Case Modulo: f(1t) Case: 1 xxxx J vZ.- I xe-,x sees. ------------ I --------------- 11. --------------- 11 __.____________.-II------ HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1--00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj xxxx 1.00 1.00 oxxx XXXX 1.00 xxx;: 1..00 i:xxz 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1..00 1.00 -v 1.00 xc<.r::; xz:ax 1.00 1.00 x_c,:x , . x.,x;: �.,._ Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 .,-._-. 0.86 ...,r,. 0.85 LT Adj: 0._5 xx :x .., .: 0.95 -x..,.; z: 0-95 xxx:;:< 0.95 9 - ., .v, ,•; �-,: _,. xxxx .car., ._.c.�.,.. PedBil;e Adj: 1.00 1.00 X1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1-00 0.95 1.00 1..00 1-00 1.00 FnI Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0-85 ------------ I --------------- ... 11--------------- ------- II Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < . ; < < a < < < . < < < < No - -> - � . % > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < Actuated I r > > > , DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Traffix 8.0.0716 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. 'Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Eest+Ambi-Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 19-2 bevel Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ..,. ,,,x..w....a..>..,,.,......,...................... ............ ,., ....... Intersection 116 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr ... .a..xa,.ri............o-.........x.x........r.........r........ .... .....�.... Appireach: North Bound South Found EasL Nuund West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - - R L - T - R -------- _.--- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ------ _.._______-I Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.5B 0.58 0.03 0.49 0.99 Arrival'Type: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 9.7 2.7 2.7 5.6 3.5 2.7 3.3 4.7 4.6 0.6 10.1 2.1 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ear.LyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 l.2 0.2 HCM2RQucue: 5.9 9.0 9.0 6.9 9.6 3.7 4.5 5.1 '5.1 1.0 7.1.9 2.3 ____ -__________II --------------- II--------------- 11--------- .______I 70th;Factor: 1.19 7..19 1.7.9 1.7.8 1.19 1..19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.19 HCM21:70th4: 7.0 9.7 9.7 8.2 5.5 4.4 5.3 6.1 6.1 1.2 13.3 2.8 ---------- ...._---- ...----------- II--------------- II---------------- II_______________I 85th4,Factor: 1.55 1.56 .7..56 1.54 1.56 1.57 ]..56 1.55 1.55 1.59 1.51 1.58 HCM2k85thQ: 9.1 6.2 6.2 10.6 7.2 5.8 7.0 8.0 8.0 1.7 17.1 3.7 ---------- .__--------------- --------------- --------------- ________.._______i 90th?, Factor: 1.'70 1..73 :1..73 1.68 1.'72 1.73 7..72 1.77. 1.71 1.78 1.63 1.76 HCM2k90thQ: 7.0.0 6.8 6.8 11.6 8.0 6.4 7.7 B.8 8.8 1.8 18.5 9.1 ------------ ---------- ...---- II--------------- 11---------------- 11_______________I 95th8Factor: 1.93 1.9B 1.98 1.91 1.96 1.99 1..97 1.95 1.915 2.07 1.82 2.03 HCM2k95thQ: 11.3 7.8 '7.8 13.2 9.1 7.3 8.8 10.0 10.0 2.1 20.7 41.7 __---- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---- .________-__I 98th1["actor: 2.39 2.99 2.99 2.29 2.40 2.95 2.41 2.37 2.37 2.62 2.7.2 2.59 HCM2k98thQ: 13.7 9.6 9.6 15.8 11.1 9.0 7.0.8 12.2 12.2 2.7 24.0 5.9 Traffi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE F"Is t+Amb+Pro ject AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 l0::19: 06) Page 14-3 ______________----- ......____________ Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative d f'1A1 II I Ih; l„ f k+ b+ i a f Y is I x* f 1 l:, I I+IAIi I,IIIIAIII a n A. x e. 1 a**. k d 14 k L a A u r.+* 1 I Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr 5 Riverside DI Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - 'i L - '1' - R h - T - R L - T - R ----------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- _____----__.____� Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numof.Stops: 42.1 44.8 1.9 50.5 59.3 24.3 29.9 £30.6 41.5 5.1 97..1 19.1 ----------------------------------------- _.______________-----___-____________---..._ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: ©0.872 pounds 13.7.01 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 252.320 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 19.702 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.543 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.916 pounds ------------------------------- ....__________________--_______________-_---._._________ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 80.872 pounds 13.101 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 252.320 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 19.702 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.543 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.916 pounds ------------------------------------- .._______________-----_______________-_-.__.____ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropri.a'Ce since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 'traffix 8.0.0715 ((;) 2008 )nwluig As_oc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E>:st+Able +project AM 'iue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 15-1. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersectlon ill High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 7.00 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.512 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (se(;/veh) 15.9 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B II,I i ikf I I k II IlIKI+1 I ,A}k+t#i+1i*III..I"II.*I.IIAIto#i♦*II+k1k.+#,a-,F kk{kkt A4oA Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- ...-I --------------- II--------------- II___._.____.___.__.__II----------- ... _._._I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II._...._._...._ ---.._...---II--------------- Ii --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 C 11 236 0 35 99 656 3 4 689 305 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 656 3 4 684 305 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 3..00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 656 3 4 684 305 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 656 3 4 684 305 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ELF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 Fi.nalVo7.ume: 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 656 3 4 684 305 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- 11 - -I ,Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 3..00 0.88 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 0.15 0.00 0.85 0.87 0.00 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.38 0.62 Final Sat.: 257 0 1413 1558 0 237, 7.805 3590 16 1805 2382 7.062 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Capacity - -Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.3.5 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** '*'* "., 111' Green/Cycle: 0-02 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.56 0.56 Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.57, 0.00 0.57, 0.51 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.51 0.51 Uni..form Del: 48.9 0.0 4B.9 29.2 0.0 29.2 46.5 9.7 9.7 A9.4 7.3.5 13.5 IncremntDel: 16.5 0.0 16.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 5.1 0.1 0.1 12.6 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 65.4 0.0 65.4 30.1 0.0 30.1 51.6 9.8 9.8 62.0 1.3.7 13.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdiDel/Veh: 65.4 0.0 65.4 30.1 0.0 30.1 51.6 9.8 9.8 (2.0 13.7 13.7 LOS by Move: E A E C A C D A A E B B HCM2):Avg4: 1 0 1 7 0 72 5 5 0 10 10 -.11,1 I AIII#If,ik++44ink+at,-liA,:'.,-k+id♦1A I IIk,F .......... ,.1Y, a_1tYlY,t1_aA lAi ai Note: Queue reported is the number o£ cars per lane. Traffi;. 8.0.0'715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Gzst+Amb+project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 16-1. -------- -- __________________________________________________________'--"---------_________ Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 112 Ilion School Entrance F. Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bowed West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- --------- --- - --------------- II - - - - --I HCM Ops Adjusted Dane Uti 1. i zation Module: Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1. 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L Be RT L RT IYP If LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 .. 2 ____....__.__._..._---- ----------II_______________II_____- --II----.-...--------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: .._ 1'' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 Crsswalb_Wid: B 8 8 B Hoy Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: ()1,, 017, 01,11 OS; Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < � I Other > : > > > > . Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Excl. usive R'T: Include Include Include Include 11 RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 --------- ..--.-I --------------- II_______________ II_____--II-----._------I HCM Ops f(,lt) Adj Case Module: f (lt) Case: 9 .c_,_., 4 9 xssx H 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxr'_: xxxx ------------ I --------------- H --------------- II_______________ II. --------------- I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wi.d Adj: 1.00 xx;Ix 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 zxax 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 x_a... 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 xx;;x 1.00 1.00 x.._... 1.00 xxxx. 1.00 1.00 Y,xz": 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xx:ix 1.00 {. ...,.x 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 xxxx Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 r::-": 0.89 0.98 x...,., 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.95 0.95 LT Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.96 "^" - 0.96 0.95 xxxxx 0.95 x>: is r: x:; 't:::: -.. r_x xxxx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.88 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 ELF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.8B 1.00 0.88 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 ------------ ------ .._-------- II --------------- II --------------- II ----------I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: . < . . � . . NO , > > > > ; , . , > > % > >, Signal Type: < I < < < < c I, Actuated > , > > > DelAdjctr: 1.00 0.00 1..00 1..00 0.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1L F 00 1.00 1.00 S11tL1i ii�Ntr{Y�#%*li1+i}{*11111)Xf*1 F111+�k*{1Li#AAAI-11)-_1-)f--I Jii Yak i,#k#nM*{#A Traffix B.0.0'/15 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE L,st+Amb-i-Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Pago 16-2 ------------ .------------------------- .._-._..__.____________________________________ ______----._._.____________________________________.-.__.-._---_---______-_ Level Of .Service Detailed Computation Report (14C1,12000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ...........,,llAl..,.l.+t.� Intersection 47 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr I I * I I I II I - I 1Af ll k IIII1, 4*II#..I, I I I k, I I I I k I I II I i i I I I I I I I I I I is I I I I I # I I I I I i.'.'f I Y I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ .--------------- II --------- ...----- II--------------- I --------------- I Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.56 0.56 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prog_ractor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.4 0.0 0.4 6.2 0.0 6.2 1.2 4.7 4.7 0.1 8.9 8.9 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.0 1..0 11CM2KQueue: 1..1 0.0 1.1 7.3 0.0 7.3 2.1 5.1 5.1 0.4 9.9 9.9 ------------ ------- ....------- II--------------- II.---------------- II ---__-_________I 70th°Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.19 1..19 1.20 1.18 1.18 1-ICM2k70thQ: 1.3 0.0 1.3 8.6 0.0 8.6 2.5 6.1 6.1 0.5 11..7 11.7 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 8511-h�,Factor: 1.59 1..60 1..59 1.54 1.60 1.54 1.5£3 1.55 1.55 L 60 1.52 1.52 11CM21:85thQ: 1.7 0.0 1.7 11.2 0.0 11.2 3.3 8.0 8.0 0.7 15.1 1.5.1 ------------ --------------- II---------------- II.--------------- II ---------------I 90thgFactor: 1.78 1.80 1.78 1.68 1.80 1.68 1.76 1.71. :L.71 1.79 1.64 1.64 HCM2k.90thQ: 1.9 0.0 1.9 12.2_ 0.0 12.2 3.1 8.8 8.8 0.8 16.3 16.3 ------------ ....-------------- II--------------- .II--------------- II_______________I 95th,Factor: 2.07 2.10 2.07 1.90 2.10 1.90 :2.03 1.95 1.95 2.09 1.85 1.85 HCM2k95thQ: 2.2 0.0 2.2 1.3.8 0.0 13.8 4.2 10.0 10.0 0.9 18.3 1.8.3 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- _----------- II ------.__----I 98th$['actor: 2.62 2.70 2.62 2.27 2.70 7_.27 2.55 2.37 2.37 2.67 2.17 2.17 HCM2k98thQ: 2.8 0.0 2.B 16.5 0.0 16.5 5.3 1.2.2 12.2 1.2 21.6 21.5 Traffi_x 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E._sl Amb -i -Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.0:29:06 Page 16-3 --------------------------------- Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Lit erscction N7 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr II# II ,1t-r.**kII 1141 i.>i, I - III IIIIIiI IYi 1# f t*1 AI II I Ii,.II II All II II II I II IAAA♦ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II________ -_-----I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOLStops: 0.5 0.0 2.7 49.0 0.0 7.3 10.7 £30.0 0.4 1.0 105 46.9 ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Nuel Consumption: 45.552 pounds 7.379 gallons Carbon 1),,:ide: 142.123 pounds Carbon Mcnos,ide: 10.610 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.760 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.528 pounds ----------------------------------------- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 45.552 pounds 7.379 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 142.123 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 10.610 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.760 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.52£3 pounds --------------------------------------------------------------------- DLS CLAIMP.R The fuel consumption and emissions measures shou]..d be. used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric desiq_n alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculat,i.ons are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFBIM. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elemcnPs. T, ffjn £3.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE GxstrAmh+PrC]cct AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:79:06 Page 17 Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HIM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) sit uxxs> aaaixa�xs>xe,+...+x xrr.xx+x>,x u,ta.«.+«+x+a wx. +sarx+r��.+,.x+s.axx>.� Intersection i18 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr xex�.x�t«e.+xu r<�rs.aaa xFre+e,x�.trexaxrai�xfix,.+xess+.«.�+.�x.r,a.. rt*+t+�+.sxa. Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vou../Cap.(Y.): 0.430 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 2H Level Of Service: B Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: i, - T - R L - '1 - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II --------------- Control: _----- --Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1. 0 1 1 0 ------------ I ------ ....-------- II------------- _.-II --------------- II--- ------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 7 1 12 103 1 153 1.80 567 1 5 611 82 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial Rse: 7 1 12 1.03 1 153 180 567 1 5 611 82 User Adj: 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 PHf Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 1 12 103 1 153 180 567 1 5 611 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 1 1.2 103 1 153 180 567 1 5 611 82 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F:i.nalVolume: 7 1 12 103 1 153 I80 567 1 5 611 82 --------- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3,900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 0.87 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.76 0.24 Final Sat_: 1413 202 1615 1805 10 1606 1805 3604 6 1805 3126 919 --------- I -------------- ...I I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Capacity --------- -Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: 1*1* I'll +*** **+k Green/Cycle: 0.01. 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.18 0.28 0.28 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.43 0.43 Uniform Del: 49.1 47.6 47.7 33.4 33.5 33.5 32.8 6.3 6.3 49.0 18.5 18.5 IncremntDel: 6.3 0.8 2.1 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.2 0.2 InitQUeuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1_00 1.00 1.00 Do.l.ay/Veh: 55.4 48.4 49.8 33.8 34.3 34.3 33.5 6.3 6.3 54.5 18.7 18.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :L.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 55.4 98.4 49.8 33.8 34.3 34.3 33.5 6.3 6.3 54.5 1.8.7 18.7 LOS by Move: E D D C C C C A A D B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 3 4 4 S _ 4 4 0 B B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 9+} f+ x I I k+, e I � x x II, alit,,,"1 ♦.111+#1x,x.-A#X'*fxx4# I I I i, i t X n}' k a a x 113 x x, 4 a i x A Y Ax Traffiz H.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assec. hi.censed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st+Amb+Project AM TUC Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 18-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 11111A1x1xx1"*+2***la.......1114111x1111111..xT1.i111...1..\1A *x, a-X+1aAAAkY11f1Yx Intersection Ike Stadium Way & Riverside Dr 1 vFi1A'111{r11x4V£.11.1 „ 1ehdLdYA x+x+x11.,A ,...a,11,+1#1\k11. _A_A.],,,11 xx1a k11.S 1F Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- 11 --------------- 1;------__-.____--II- HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR L RIP RT L RT RT L RT RT 4Lns.TnGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 ------------ I ---------------- 11.. --------------- 1j__..._..__---______11--------___..___1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 Lev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: OT 08 0';, 05 Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < � < < < < 1 < < c <, < < < < Other r , Cn,ft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Incl ads g RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------1 HCM Ops f(It) Ad_i Case Module: f(lt) Case: 9 9 1 1,..... 1 xxxx 1 szo,. xxxx z:xx;c xxz_P ,_ ____I --------------- II___.--_---_.___--il___-__.__------_11.__-------------1 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln WIN Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Bev Veh Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :L.00 1.00 Park ing Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxs-r_ 1.00 1.00 ,,,.,.x 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 ax,`o 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.91 0.91. 0.91 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx ]..00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 PIT Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xxxx. 0.95 ::xxx.. 0.95 Xx...Xx .._.,.. " xY,.n Y. i::, x, PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.98 Use Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 In] Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 -------- ._--- 1--------------- 11_--_ __11._______________II----- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < , < . < < < < I, No > > , , > > . . , Signal 'Type: < < < < < < , < < : < Actuated. . . , , De.lAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1.00 1.0 . 0 1. . 00 1.00 1 . .00 L*�i).**1*1i*1*-F*#*x+'itAk*#1i1ia11]t#+111 Yi 4* -k Aiil kL i-11-11A+1x1111 1JI#1x*1'11 TraffiU 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Er.st+Ambi Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 18-2 bevel Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative >.,. +..... A ................ ...+.......++ ...............1m1", ...... ;:x+ Intersection #8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr .X lA�t3..*]AYi.I+.*ii.i**...*{.1A}l*#%.A.*Y.*.1ii1�.'♦*.*+n.i*iA#*..ice.#. *xxi 1.*.. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'I,' - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------- Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.45 0.45 Arri.valType: 3 3 3 3 Prog Bactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.2 0.2 0.3 2.9 3.7 3.7 4.3 3.2 3.2 0.1. 6.9 6.9 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 42: 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 HCM2KQueue: 0.8 0.4 0.7 2.8 4.4 4.4 5.0 3.5 3.5 0.4 7.6 7.6 ----- ...------ --------------- II---------------- II--------------- II--------- ----- 70th Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.:10 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.1.9 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.18 HCM2k70thQ: 0.9 0.5 0.8 3.3 5.2 5.2 5.9 4.2 4.2 0.5 9.0 9.0 ---- ...------- ---------------- II--------------- II-------------- -I I... --__-----___-I 85th+,Factor: 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.57 1.56 1.56 1.55 1.57 1.57 1..60 1.53 1.53 HCM2 k85thQ: 1..2 0.7 1.1. 4.4 6.9 6.9 '7.8 5.5 5.5 0.6 1.1.7 1.1.7 ___- ------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- -------- 90th9,FacL0r: 1. 78 1.79 1.79 1.75 1.72 1.72 1.71 1.74 1.74 1.79 1.67 1.67 HCM200thQ: 1.9 0.8 1.2 4.9 7.6 'c.6 8.6 6.1 6.1 0.7 12.7 1.2.7 ------------ ---- ...---------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- -I 95th3Eactor: 2.07 2.09 2.08 2.01 1.97 1.97 1.95 1.99 1.99 2.09 1.89 1.89 HCM2k95thQ: 1..6 0.9 1.4 5.6 8.7 8.7 9.8 7.0 7.0 0.8 14.4 14.4 ----------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------------ ---I 981:h?.Factor: 2.64 2.67 2.65 2.51 2.41 2.41 2.38 2.46 2.46 2.67 2.26 2.26 HCM2k98thQ: 2.0 1.2 1.8 7.0 10.6 10.6 1.1.9 8.6 8.6 1.1 17.2 17.2 Traffi.>: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed 'Co VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exsti-Amb+project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29:06 Page 18-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Have Volume Alternative +*ii4}*1h*31n{1 A1F**Y111Ak**-FA.>�lli-k111r 4**#++iAYY*Yt���A�A_A.in111-1*.t*A14}xkt# Intersection $8 Stadium Way F Riverside Dr ♦I.I I I I I I II II,A II III } I , , IkI3IIIn I I I ; I I I I I I I I I I I I A x Y I-IYI 1 A 1 I I I I, 1 I I 1 i I I 11f I II I,AA Approach: North Bound South Bound East Hound West Bound Movement L - T - R i. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1 --------------- 11 ------- _._...----- i1 --------------- 11_---______---__I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numof Stops: 1.7 0.2 2.9 21.7 0.2 32.9 38.9 59.7 0.1 1..2 109 13.9 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 93.276 pounds 7.011. gallons Carbon Dioxide: 1.35.021. pounds Carbon Monoxide: ].(7.253 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1."759 pomids Nitrogen Oxides: 0.995 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Pue1 Consumption: 93.276 pounds 1.011 gal .lons Carbon Dioxide: 135.021 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 10.253 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.759 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.995 ponnds DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be. used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or .for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 DOWling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E,:st+Amb+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Paye 1-1 ---------- ------------------------------------------ ..------------------------------ __.________ Scenario Report Scenario: Exsti-Amb+Project PM Colmnand: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configural ion: Default Command Default Volume Default Geometry Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default 'Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration 'P Taff i;; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowiinq_ Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE F%:st+Amb+Proiect PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 2--1 Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Do.l./ V/ LOS Veh C If 1 Grand Ave & Machado St B 10.2 0.416 if 2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave B 11.4 0.062 4 3 SR 74/R,iverside Dr & Grand Ave B 19.6 0.494 if 4 Grand Ave & Macy St A 5.8 0.808 If 5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr C 21.9 0.825 if 6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr C 29.4 0.724 Future Change Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C B 1.0.2 0.476 + 0.000 V/C B 11.4 0.062 + 0.000 D/V B 19.6 0.494 + 0.000 D/V A 5.8 0.808 -1 0.000 D/V C 21.9 0.825 + 0.000 D/V C 29.4 0.724 + 0.000 D/V It 7 High School Entrance & Riversi A 4.7 0.351 A 4.7 0.351 + 0.000 D/V If 8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr A 5.6 0.336 A 5.6 0.336 + 0.000 D/V lraffir. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed tc VA CONSULTING, TRVINR Esti-Ivnb+Pro ject RM Tue Mar 31, 2015 7.].:38:23 Page 3-1 --------------------------------------------------- ------ ._-----_______________-__.--- --.------------_--____-______________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH 9 -Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Grand Ave & Machado S1; Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.976 Loss 'Lime (sec): 0 Averagc Delay (sec/veh): 10.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B Street Name: Grand Ave Machado St Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Hound West Round Movement: L - T - R h - T - P. L - T - R L - 'T - R ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--------------- Control: --------------ControL Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include. Incl. ads 7: no Lude .Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II---------------- II ----------.------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 258 138 17 209 0 0 2 1 83 1 26 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1'. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 258 138 1.7 209 0 0 1 83 7, 26 User Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PBF Volume: 1 258 138 17 209 0 0 2 1, 83 1 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 258 138 17 209 0 0 2 1 83 1 26 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7, 258 138 17 209 0 0 2 1 83 1 26 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_ --- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.65 0.39 0.08 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 0.75 0.01 0.29 Final Sat.: 2 593 290 58 700 0 0 909 205 979 6 150 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.29 0.29 xxxx ...., 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: *1,, 1.11 lk" ,.,. Delay/Veh: 10.9 10.9 10.9 9.9 9.9 0.0 0.0 8.2 8.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel./Veh: 10.9 10.9 10.9 9.9 9.9 0.0 0.0 8.2 8.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 LOS by Move: B B B A A ' ' A A A A A ApproachDel: 10.9 9.9 8.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 10.9 9.9 8.2 9.2 LOS by Appr: B A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 *x�-1�nt+**##k�*L*4'%'Yi1.4-11k3**ilAk3kY!#iYkY�s***114.14*i.*1-1A-1i+*+*#iYA kaI;]2ni-t**}. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffic 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Est+ilmbi P r of e C PM Tue Mar 31, 2013 11:38:23 Page 4-1 Leve]. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2060 HCM 9 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative II III II I - k IIIIIA*i............. r I I I I I I I I I. I I I + P , , , , r\,,,, 4, I I Y A A I 1 I I I l i I I r. 4 I k Y. AI Sntersection H1. Grand Ave & Machado St .... 4#h>.............,,II, I I I I I I t I 1114111 k I I I I I I I I k 11k1„ Irk%1T 11 A lA lx ei,n.1. Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R ---------------- I I, - T - R I, - T - R -I-- -_ ----------- I Time Period: ---------------- 0.25 hour HevVeh: 0 Oo Ob 0. Alpha Value: 0.01. -_I-------------- .__I__ ----------- I_._____ GroupType: __I______________. 1 1 1 7. P[C11: 0.60 0.95 0.32 0.38 P[(:2]: 0.29 0.39 0.06 0.00 P[C3]: 0.12 0.09 0.91 0.98 PICS]: 0.05 0.08 0.19 0.13 P[C5]: 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 Padj[C1]: 0.006 0.008 0.015 0.019 Pad) [C,',] -0.000 -0.002 0.008 0.007 Padj[C3I: -0.003 -0.002 -0.010 -0.013 Pad][C9]: -0.003 -0.005 -0.011 -0.008 Pad][C5]: -0.000 -0.000 ---------------- -0.002 -0.000 I-------- .________I ------------ Lane: ----------------- L1. ---------------- L1 L1 L1 Lane'1'ype: LEPTTHRURITE LEFTTHRORITE LEPTTHRURITE ___I---_____ LEFT'THRURPP[,I ----------- I---------------- HeadwayAdj: -0.208 I________________I-____ 0.015 -0.200 0.009 Volume: 397 221 3 110 Capacity: 835 758 619 639 DegOfOtil: 0.97 0.28 0.00 0.16 DepHeadway: 9.23 9.61 5.77 5.20 Se.rvi.ce'Pime: 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 Delay: 1.0.9 9.9 B.2 9.2 Queue: 0.8 0.9 0.0 __...-__I 0.2 _____I _ _I____ Approach: __--I________________I_ North Bound South Bound ---------------- East Bound West Bound I -______._.-______I _____--------------------- Approach Del: 10.9 ---------------- 9.9 8.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj De 1: 10.9 9.9 8.2 9.2 LOS by Appr: B A A A OverallDel: 10.2 OverallLOS: B Ir a f fia. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CON97111,TiNG, IRVINE Exst+Amb]Project PM 'Pile Mar 37., 2015 1.1:38:23 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignaii,ed Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 112 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave I }.. Y i I I i t f a l l I I I S*#,. t k Y k+ f f M i A„ i l f f l.+ I I I t I I I I 18 I I II I I n. Y.+ 3 Ii s. v i w i++}MlIixI Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: 6[ 11.9] SLieel, Ndiue: (,rand Ave Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- control: Oncontroll ed Uncont. r01. ). ed Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --- ....----------- II--------------- II--------------- II--- ---- - Volume Module: Base Vol: 38 930 0 0 289 28 30 0 39 0 G 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial Noe: 38 930 0 0 289 28 30 0 39 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 38 930 0 0 285 28 30 0 39 0 0 0 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 38 930 0 0 289 28 30 0 39 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II___ --------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 9.1 xxx.", xxxxx xxxx r;xxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx ..x -. _..1111 xxxx -.11..11..,, Follow0pTim: ^.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx .11.11_,.. 3.5 4.0 3.3 .I -II .. -II -II --------------- Capacity morlate: Cnflict Vol: 312 x._..,._......, XXIIn xxxx sxxx>: 517 809 156 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1.260 z:_e,: .,..-11.11,. x,,,xx 593 31.9 868 xxxx xxxx xxxxe ,....; .,v-11.11 �. :..11.11., .. ;.1111.; .,.; 11..11.. Move Cap.: 1260 xxxxx .:ix -11.11,.., xxxxx 981 309 868 xxxx xxxx ..._11_.11 - .11..11,., xxxxx volume/Cap: 0.03 x_xx xxxx x.,_,. .,xxx 0.06 0.00 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --- _----------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95tho: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxXx rx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx X=xx LOS by Move: A . z a ,-.;a:I >..,x tea: . 11;11>,-+ . . , Movement: L'1' - LTD - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xse.,: ;x, ,,,,.Xx .,xxx 631 xxrxa: xxxx xxxx: xxxxx Sha redQueue:xxxxx '•- -�x xr; 1x 0.3 xxxxx. xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ..sa„ xxx:.: ,..,1.111', Shrd ConDel:xxxxx ....X"n 2:on11,-,:xn11.,.xX x x x 11.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: , * + t . + . B , . + �, ApproachDel: ....:,xxx 11.9 ,. -_ x.,xxx ApproachLOS: + + B , Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. .+na..,1+ 111ua...........wna Traff.ix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Er.stiAmb-�Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 6-1 --------------------------------------- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsionali9ed Method Base Volume Alternative >+,x,iIIIII I, I I I I I r I i a s l n I Ii I i i i 4 x I f i, 1, l I I + I I I ,,,t -k#,,, F I I l_ A. i,., 1 I x x# -n -i -A I I I I I Intersection 42 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave *#it*Y#**%*ta>)Ykl->*)tA1Fl+4-kll AA1A?1W\1-\h1YTT Yfl YY.1N*}�lt�Y.ytAY}%-%t}-1A+k1 kf Approach: North Bound Soutn Bound East Bound West Bound Movement.: .� - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------- .----------- I_ -J HevVeh: -------------I 0% -------- ......_._.._.___---------------- 0 0 OE; Grade: Oo 01, Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour 'Iraffir. 8.0.0"715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA (ONSOL`PCNG, IRVINE E:zst bAmb+Projc+ct PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 7-7. __._._.__--------------------------------.____-----------_-_._. Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1:*i5 �1k+-A*+1iii�k�**i�11�*)t#i Fi Yi +3)lA-�1*4**LY iI'1}-y##�I I�AI*i}}1li Yi-r.*AA1v AAAI Intersection 43 SR 74/Riversi.de Dr & Grand Ave *�111I 4f�♦#Far i1�*YA1YY �*n}**i-11I kt*#ilii FA#�#+AAYAAiA-1f 1fi1✓hY AA1r.1Jl4AAFYa Y. s*�F Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol../Cap.(G): 0.494 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.6 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level. Of Scrvicc: B lx „�r.-�.a i „ e„ xwa.�ilxllr+✓✓+s+c+�+tel#xlf lxa, a ++>.f>lit> «nxly �.�+1-x r+. xlra✓x Street Name: SR 74/Riverside Dr Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - P - R L - T - R --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II...... --------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yi-R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 banes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ ---------- ...---- II--------------- li---------- ..---- II--------------- I Volume Module: Rase Vol: 330 911 0 0 538 124 103 0 214 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Initial Rae: 330 911 0 0 538 124 103 0 214 0 0 0 user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PPtP Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP' Volume: 330 911 0 0 538 124 103 0 214 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 330 911 0 0 538 124 .103 0 214 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PILE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fi.nalVolume: 330 911 0 0 538 124 103 0 21.4 0 0 0 ----- ....------ ------ ...-------- II---- ....---------- II--------------- II -------.._..._-----I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat_: 1805 3610 0 0 3610 1.615 3502 0 161.5 0 0 0 __..... ----- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ...._.______--I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.:1.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 C,ri.t Moves: ""^ ll"** I I I I Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 24.3 7.2 0.0 0.0 28.7 26.4 27.6 0.0 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 lncremnt Fiel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.7. 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ini tQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1..00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 24.9 7.3 0.0 0.0 29.0 26.7 27.6 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User UclAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.9 7.3 0.0 0.0 29.0 26.7 27.6 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C A A A C C C A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 8 6 0 0 7 3 1 0 6 0 0 0 .+-a. r. . ✓�.+-,,,.�xaai r, .a x+.. u+ «lxl a, -1, .F<Srlli l+.t«s+.,.x.ex+car ✓. xlrs,r a ea Note: Queue ieportod is the number of cars per lane. xn-.,✓,x.x+_..�,sex-c.�,�.s+m�s�rtiix+e��ar+�x+axa,���u,.ex ✓, e,.+�»�..�✓�✓.,xn..� x»s� Tratfil 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Esst+Amb+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 20115 11:38:23 Page 8-1 Level Of .Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 SR 79/Riverside Dr S Grand Ave saw♦�a ,+xw+xa,re++++,,,..xr.w�„.eer,az..,xea,..r�.�swa,.+x+r+�araeao-e.,u ,+, .eax Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - - 12 L - 'f - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 ---------------- ;1--------------- 11----_____-_____1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: L T xxax _..X_. T R L x.._,.. _ R xxxx xYux fl it, n sIGrps: 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 ------------ 1 --------------- 11 --------- ...----- II--------------- 11--------------- I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 1.2 i_ 1.2 12 1.2 12 1.2 12 12 1.2 CrsswalkWi.d: 8 8 8 8 Hev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0°- Os Os 0 Parking/Hr: He No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < - < - < Other > , > , > > > : Erst+Aiiluf Project PM The Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 8-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volmne Alternan.Ve ......... er.�.e+ err.+.�x„ +>+e „ rar. x.e x�,.�.......... Intersection #3 SR 79/Riverside Or & Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound ;lest Bound MuvemeuC: h - '1 - R L - T - R L - T - R L - _ - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ------ ..._______._I Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arra. valType: 3 3 3 3 Proq Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 Ql: 7.1 5.8 0.0 0.0 6.5 2.6 1.7. 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Upstreanvc: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreantAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarLyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q2: 7..0 0.6 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.7, 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM2EQueue: 8.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 7.9 2.9 1.2 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________I_______________ _____I 70th,Factor: 1..18 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.18 7..19 1.20 1.20 1.19 1 -1 1.20 1.20 HCM2 K7othQ: 9.5 "7.6 0.0 0.0 8.8 3.5 1.5 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------- --------------- II--------------- II-------- ...------ II_______.________I 85th;,Factor: I.53 1..59 1.60 1.60 1.53 7..57 7..59 1.60 1.55 1..60 1.60 1.60 HCM2k85thQ: 12.3 9.9 0.0 0.0 11.9 9.6 2.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------- I_______II--------------- II--------------- [I ------- .________I 90thS,Factor: 1..67 1.69 1.80 1.80 1.68 1.75 1..78 1.80 1.70 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k.90thQ: 13.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 12.9 5.i 2.2 0.0 1.0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ...________I 95th8Factor: 1.88 7..92 2.1.0 2.1.0 1.90 2.01 2.06 2.10 1.93 2.10 2_.10 2.10 HCM21:95thQ: 15.1 12.9 0.0 0.0 1.9.1 5.9 2.5 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 --------------- II---------------- II--------------- II___._.________.___I 98th, -Factor: 2.29 2.31 2.70 2.70 2.27 2.50 2.61 2.70 2.33 2.70 ?.70 2.70 HCM21;98thQ: 18.0 7.9.9 0.0 0.0 16.8 7.9 3.2 0.0 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Traffi.x 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, ISVINE E-st+Arlo i -Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1):38:23 Page 8-3 Fuel Consumuti_on and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative �xx........... r,... n x s r.,,e........... Intersection If3 SR 74/Riverside Jr & Grand Ave +.,.AAk#n..k.+.l kf#+,, a a. i.+R,-u e4111++l.I1114 *111++#+.}.i.r1II I-1 x.... k Lhl 1. Y. r. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- I - I ----- I I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 63.6 z...... 0.0 0.0 110 23.9 19.9 0.0 95.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 56.871. pounds 9.213 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 177.938 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 7.3.517 pounds Hydrocarbons: "_'.329 pounds Nitrogen Prides: 0.652 pounds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maine: year. 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 56.871 pounds 9.213 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 177.938 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 13.517 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.329 pounds Nitrogen O>:ides: 0.652 pounds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFTX. Networl_ models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffin 8.0.0715 ((:) 2008 Fowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1RViNE EXst+Amb+Project PM The Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) xxrr11aa+1111+ax..ase+a..... Intersection H4 Grand Ave & Macy St saner...areae...a.e. "A..x+...a...............e.e...... Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Val./Cap.(Y.): 0.808 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.8 OpLlmal Cycle: 5/ hovel Of Service: A Street Name: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - - R ___I______..II_______________II__--_______.____ 11__-________--__1 Control.: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include is nclude Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PIS: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I. 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7. ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11...-------------- 11_.________.______1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 1233 0 2 645 19 0 27 0 0 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bsc: 34 1233 0 2 615 52 19 0 27 0 0 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Volume: 34 1233 0 1 1 695 52 19 0 27 0 0 3 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 34 1233 0 2 645 52 19 0 27 0 0 3 0 PCF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final.Volume: 34 1233 0 _ 645 52 19 0 21 0 0 3 ------------I--------------- -- ----------- --------------- --------------- 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1..00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.87 Lanes: 0.03 0.97 0.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final, Sat.: 50 1.803 0 6 1894 1.615 1900 0 1615 0 0 1644 --------------- II--------------- 11-------------- ...I 1____-__________.1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: 11A1 e.., Green/Cycle: 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 Volume/Cap: 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.09 Uniform Del: 2.3 2.3 0.0 1.1 1.1 0.7 29.1 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 2.8.8 IncremntDel: 3.2 3.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 9.1 0.0 81.2 0.0 0.0 1.:L InitQheuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 5.5 5.5 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.7 38.1 0.0 .110.5 0.0 0.0 29.9 User De1.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad]Del/Veh: 5.5 5.5 0.0 1..2 1.2 0.7 38.1 0.0 110.5 0.0 0.0 29.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A D A F A A C HCM2kAvgQ: 14 14 0 3 3 0 1. 0 2 0 0 0 ,e. r,...>.... ...r.+.., ,i a...e. i...+e. .�...a...,., ae+...�e,.a.....>.eeeA...... Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 'Praffie 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1RVINF st-i-Amb+-Project PM 7'ue Mar 31, 2015 1.1:38:23 Page 10 1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 04 Grand Ave & Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound Last Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---- ---------- 11 --------------- 11____--__-------il- IICM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Lane Group: LT LIT Xx x LT LT R LT LT R R x itLnsliiGrps: 7. 1 0 1 1 1 7. 1 1 0 0 1 ------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II____________...__I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 1.2 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 Crsswal kWid: 8 8 8 8 1 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: OG; 0`3 01. 0'A Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Arca Type: < . : < < . c < < < < < < Other - - - - r Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Ez.c l usi veRT: Include Include Include Include S RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- 11 ---------------- I1_--___________....11____________.___1 HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 5 5 xxxx _ 5 xxxx 5 >.xx.: xxxx ..-..., -------------- I... -------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- 11_____________-._1 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wd Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 >..,-x,- 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Hev Veil Adj: 1.00 1..00 xxxxzt 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 xsxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Grade Adj : 1..00 1.00 .,.,xxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 x":x<.x..._ 1 .00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 ,ce:,,,-x xxxx raxc 1.00 x =xrx 1.00 -:-,xx 1.00 Bus 5tp Adj: 1.00 1..00 xxxx:; xxxx � 1.00 ��a>� 1.00 xr.:u; xsxx 1.00 xxxx, ....,.., Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 r:....,. 1_00 _....,....,..= 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xsxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 x._.,., xxxx 0.85 ._...h 0.87 LL Adj 0.98 0.98 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 xxcxx 1.00 vxxz sxxx. xasr: xz: PedBikc Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1_00 0.87 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl .Sat Adj: 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.87 ------------ 1--------------- 11_______________11-_____--_----_-II--- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No - - - > - - - - - Signal Type - < < < < < < < Actuated - > - - - - DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1..00 0.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 100 0.00 0.00 1.00 TraFfix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 fowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1'RVING Rest+Ambi Project PM Poe Mar 31, 2015 1.1:38:23 Page 10-2 -------- ----------------- .-_____.._---___----_------_-_-----"--___--- Level Of. Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative >+irr e+e ..n+�+ a ,t+e�.eFa es.n ex»,=-xz+A��.a.�xwxrtxw+=esa.�a+,xx>♦�ia�+.e a-xxarx-sx-n. Intersection 444 Grand Ave & Macy St Lk 1iAlAi*h*AIY kYt{#1l+a�Ak#i+A A 1A l-++W�Y1Ak#-Y4#kn1l±.2iti[i lkw*+A }lil-1A**k*�'F%-A -A*1 Approach: North South East West Cycle LenyLL, C: Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: Opposing Effective, Green Time, go: (10 50.76 50.76 50.76 50.76 50.76 50.76 60 1.24 1.24 1.24 60 .,axxx ........_.., ,..,,....,.. ...,,XXX Number Of Opposinq Lanes, No: 1 1 0 _.-_... Number Of Lanes Ln Lane Group, N: Adjusted Left -'Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit: 1 34 0.03 0.00 1 2 1..00 1 19 xxxxxx xxxxz:x ....,.xXx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Pito: Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: ...,x%X.. 0.57 641 0.03 0.03 1267 1.00 0.32 0 Xxxxxx xxxxxx ..,..,._,,.. Opposing Glow Per Lane Per Cycle, Vole: 10.78 2]..1.2 0.00 ._..,,.n„ Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: Lost Time Per Phase, tl: Eff grn until arrival of left -turn car, gf: Opposing Queue Ratio, ore: Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, qq: 1.00 4.00 23.81 0.1.5 1.19 1.00 4.00 43.00 0.1.5 2.94 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 ,_X_..._.X >:axr_xx xxxxxx Xxxxxx x.,...xY, Eff grn while left turns filter thin, gu: Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: Proportion Of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: Left -turn Saturation tactor, fs: Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, )-A Through -car Equivalents, ell: Single Lane Through -car Equivalents, e12: Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fini.n: Single Lane Loft Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fit: 26.95 X.,xxxx xxxxxx 0.47 0.03 2.64 .,x__ xxx 0.04 0.98 0.98 7.76 0.00 0.97 xxxxxx 0.00 4.81 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.24 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx 1.00 1.40 1.00 3.23 1.00 1.00 a:xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx :1lxxaxx .,xXuxx Traffi- 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Ezst+Amh-i-Prolect PM 'Pue Mar 37., 2015 11:38:23 Paye 10-3 Level Of .Service Detailed Computation Report (H(IM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative **�)AIA�##-k lrrYiiT�talY#�F i--A-TYAl1 F+R*}ki �iA':-k*Arl 11F**A1 �\1AaAAi141 A..Y �4 SIX }i:f Intersection 1f9 Grand Ave e Macy St -k I n I II�IIII Y III II aF - I, II II II*III, II*III)I I 111I-IIII11i+II%l+.X}iA-v.+i1Y1 tx#53�11i _1i# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: I: - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __-__ --- .._.____I---------------II____---------__II_____._.---- ..._---- I I_______________I Green/Cycle: 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Proq_Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q_7.: 10.3 10.3 0.0 2.5 2.5 0.7. 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 upstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 7_00 1.00 0.00 1.00 :L.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Q2: 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 HCM2[CQueue: 19.1 19.1 0.0 3.2 3.2 0.2 7_0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 ------------ ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11_____....__...______I 70th2Factor: 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.19 7_19 1.20 1-.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1..20 1.20 HCM2k70thQ: 16.5 16.5 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.2 L 2 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ------_-___-___I 85th8Factor: 1.99 1.419 1.60 1.57 1.57 7..60 1.39 1.60 1.58 1.60 1.60 7..60 11CM2k85thQ: 21.0 21.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.3 1.7 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II---------------- i --------------- I 90th8Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.80 1.79 1.74 1.80 1.78 1.80 1.76 1.80 1.80 1.80 IICM21--90thq: 22.6 22.6 0.0 5.6 5.6 0.3 1.9 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ ...-------- II_______________I 95thoFactor: 1.77 1.77 2.10 2.00 2.00 2.09 2.07 2.10 2.09 2.10 2.10 2.10 HCM2k95thQ: 25.0 25.0 0.0 6.4 6.4 0.9 2.2 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 ---------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II________._______I 98th Factor: 2.04 2.04 2.70 2.48 2.98 2.69 2.62 2.70 2.56 2.70 2.70 2.69 HCM2k98thQ: 28.8 28.8 0.0 7.9 7.9 0.5 2.7 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 Traffi.>: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 DOW.ling Asscc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st+llmb+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015. 11:38:23 Page 10--1 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I I I I I I I I I MI I I I I . . . . . . . . . . i# I I I A I I I I I I I I 1 A I I+III/-i#t] ......, i11�1A4A.)x#%F Intersection #4 Grand Ave & Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 170vancnt: L T R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R ------------ ...__II --------------- II--------------- II_______________.I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOEStops: 9.1 150 0.0 0.1 37.7 2.1 9.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 30.932 pounds 5.011 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 96.509 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 6.511 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.875 pounds Nitrogen Onides: 0.363 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Puc]. Cons un:ption: 30.932 pounds 5.011 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 96.509 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 6.511 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.875 pounds Nitroq_en Oxides: 0.363 pounds ___..._________..__ DJ:SCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control. measures and other system elements. 'Iraffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exsti-Amb+project PM Tue ?lar 31, 2011, 11:38:23 Page 11-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *#fAA ii*{'n}Y#1�2#***tib}l)♦*fit ii.11 k-k?*++i i)1*t?.#a ............... 1n......... Intersection IYS ,Lincoln St & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.825 Less Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.9 Optimal, Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C Street Marne: Lincoln St Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'I - R L - 'P - R L - T - R _----------- I --- -11---- II_.-__----------II---- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1. 0 ------------ I --------------- II---_-_II-------______--II_ Volume Module: Base Vol; 0 0 0 239 0 80 113 961 0 0 733 249 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 239 0 80 1.13 961 0 0 733 299 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 239 0 80 113 961 0 0 733 249 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 239 0 80 113 961 0 0 733 244 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ['inalVol.ume: 0 0 0 239 0 80 113 961 0 0 733 299 -I---- --------II- ---...--II- ---II---_--------...---I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.93 7..00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1326 0 999 1805 1900 0 0 1377 458 ------------- II--------------- II------ -------- II -------------.-_I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.06 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.53 Crit Moves: 11_1 1',, ti+1l Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.08 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.2 0.0 37.2 45-5 7.9 0.0 0.0 13.4 13.4 IncremntDe L 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.5 31.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 4.8 9.8 T.nitQUeUDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 i.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 Delay/veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 50.7 77.3 9.5 0.0 0.0 18-3 18.3 user DelAdj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 AdjDel/veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 50.7 77.3 9.5 0.0 0-0 i8.3 18.3 LOS by Move: A A A D A D E A A A B B HCM2IAvgQ: 0 0 0 12 0 12 6 17 0 0 25 25 *111*VY*iiY-11F*A�Si11A�'kr A�tk>Y.a i+i ,. #*-A l\11141+a+l to x` -A- 1A1 1n'lY1AAlAlh Note: Queue reported is the number of C_arS per lane. xr. ,a+a�rll++ar+i�111, +ia 111. t.. -. 1i ,+a .aa111. ikxal+,>>.�avial re.nx-a+a++xa.. TraffIX 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dovlinn Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE. sc+Amb+Project PM Tu, Mar 31, 2015. 11:38:23 Page 12-1 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 115 Lincoln St 5 Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement h - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R I, - T - R ---------- I ---------------- II --------------- II --------------- II--- .____________1 11CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! O 0 1 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Group: xxxx xxxx ...xx LTR. LTR. LTR. Lm .. .__.. ._Xxx RT P.T #J,nsInGrps: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 l 0 0 1 1 ---------- I---------------- 11 ---------------- 11--------------- 11___._______....____1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 Crsswalkwid: 8 8 8 8 Hev Veli: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0 0� 02 Os Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus SCP/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < . < < . < < < . , < < < < < Other I , I , . . . , Cott Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 GxclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------I----------II---------------II------------------ --------------- HCM Ops f(it) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: xxx„ xxxx xxxx 9 xxxx xxxx x xxx;:...,...- ._.___________I--------------- 11 ---------------- 11---------------- 11______________....1 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: to Wid 'Adj: xxxx x._._z: xxxx. 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx: xxxx 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: xxxx: xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.001..00 xxxxs „,...,; 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj:tom..xXx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ..xxx 1.00 1.00 . Parking Adj: xxxx >axx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 x....,,.. ,,,...x 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1..00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1..00 xxxxx _xxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx. 1.00 1..00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 RT Adj:xxxx xl'x. xxxxs 0.97 xxxx 0.97 x,xx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.97 0.97 LT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx: 0.96 xxxx 0.96 0.95 xxxx. PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.0() 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 ❑sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , ed 1.00 ELF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Fill Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 ---- ._------- 1--------------- 11... -------------- 11 --------------- 11________________1 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: <. < < < < < < < < < � < < < < No > _ Signal 'type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > DelAdjrctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.e0 1.00 1.00 Aa'#AAk*n**.YY*........... *........... A....k.+.trill.. ........r 11111111 Traffic. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CON.SOLTING, 7: RVINE East+AmL+Project PM Tue Mar 37., "107.5 11:38:23 1?age 12-2 'svel Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 145 Lincoln St r. Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound last Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I, - T - R L - 'f - R L - 'P - R ------------ ..._1...._._...._._..._....___.__-H --------------- 11 --------------- 11_____________-_I Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.08 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 ArnrivalTyl,e: 3 3 3 3 Proa_Factor: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q7.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 8.9 3.1 15.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 20.6 upstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upst reamlAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.0 0.() 0.0 3.9 0.0 3.9 2.5 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 HCM2KQueuc: 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 11.8 5.6 17.3 0.0 0.0 29.6 29.6 ------------ --------------- ----- - ------- --------------- -_------ 70th%['actor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.1.7 7..20 1.1`1 1.19 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.55 HCM2k70thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3.9 0.0 13.9 6.7 20.1 0.0 0.0 28.9 28.9 ------------------------------------------ --------------- 1 1 _...._._.__......... _.._..._...... I 851 h?;I"actor: 1.60 1.60 1.60 1_50 1.60 1..50 1.55 1..97 1.60 1.60 1..43 1.113 HCM2k85LhQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7.7 0.0 17.1 8.7 25.9 0.0 0.0 35.3 35.3 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11________-______I 90thHLactor: 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.62 1.80 1.62 1.70 1..57 1.80 1..80 1.52 1. 52 I1CM2k90thp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 1.9.2 9.6 27.1 0.0 0.0 37.9 37.9 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II___ --_---------1 95thoFactorr: 2.1.0 2.10 2.10 1.81 2.10 1.81 1.99 1.73 2.1.0 2.1.0 1..65 1.65 IICM2k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 21.9 10.9 29.9 0.0 0.0 90.7 90.7 ---------- 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---_--_-__-___-I 98th'kPactor: 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.7.0 2.70 2.10 2.35 1.96 2.70 2.10 1.85 1.85 HCM2k98thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.8 0.0 29.8 13.2 39.0 0.0 0.0 95.6 95.6 Traff:i.r. 8.0.071..5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed 'Lo VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb+Project PM The Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 12-3 --______---_...________________ Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative *ii'�illk)**}*i**#***ki*AYi t+kYtiial##*Ill 1r##ti t�rlh*z1F 1A1*k *11tYt#'f+k11\AAA Intersection fly Lincoln St & Riverside Dr I I I I I I I I Ik I i I i k, k I iii+*+f++ki/ISM#anti-fI., Ik,tII. A t i+ t z l l+ f x, 4 if+tltla iii f.ia+4 Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L- T- P, L- '1' - R L 11' R L T R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MI'H 30 MPH NumOiStops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 19.1 77.8 135 0.0 0.0 1.39 96.2 ........_--_-------------...-__--______--_-----______--_--__..._.___------____---.-"--- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 65.020 pounds 10.533 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 202.869 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 15.622 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.736 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.748 pounds ------------------------------------- .....-_.__________----_____--_---____-----.- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 65.020 pounds 10.533 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 202.864 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 15.622 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.736 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.748 pounds -------------------------------------------------- _----- _______________._____--_-- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric, design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single inCersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Networi< models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffix. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Sxst-i-Am10Project PN 'rue Mar 31, 2015. 11:38:23 Paye 13-1 ----------------------------------------------- Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) i„eiai iA 4-A+S111+#+...........iiYL�Ak-k *t A*141'%'kf'zi1X. tk**+#.iJ<i**iA-1 -1111A#11-1 AA r.A Intersection #6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol./Cap.(..): 0.724 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/vela): 29.4 Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C >a1.11.11x-xx=11.1...a1 ra..<r+el lrr.++..x:+n..�.xa.aas+z-xalr „ �.+xw-�x11.xxnl,l ,erx Street Name: W Lakeshore Dr Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- --------------- II ------------- ..._II --------------- II_____________ -_I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y'R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: i 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1. 0 ° 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ---------- ...._._...----------- II--------------- II--------------- II_________._._._......_I Volume Module: Base Vol: 220 350 24 206 238 189 181 744 285 32 621 326 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Eve: 220 350 24 206 238 1.89 181 744 285 32 621 326 User Ad3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHU Ad! : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHR Volume: 220 350 24 206 238 189 181. 744 285 32 621 326 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 220 350 24 206 23B 189 181 744 285 32 621 326 PCI: Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLLAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L inciVolume: 220 350 24 206 238 189 181 744 285 32 621 326 ---- _....______I --------------- II--------------- II------------- .... _.I I_ -_--__-__-_---I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.86 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.1.3 1.00 2.00 1.00 1..00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanai Sat.: 1805 3345 229 1805 3610 1.61.5 1805 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 I--------------- II--------------- II-------------- ..I I...._._____________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.1.0 0.10 0.11 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.1B 0.02 0.33 0.20 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.1.4 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.41 0.72 0.72 0.38 0.32 0.3B 0.72 0.45 Uniform Del: 39.4 39.6 39.6 3B.7 37.6 39.8 41.2 13.1 12.7 46.3 22.3 18.8 IncremntDe.1: 8.3 3.0 3.0 5.3 0.5 9.6 10.0 0.1 0.2 2.8 3.1 0.4 1111. tQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Delay/Veh: 47.7 42.6 42.6 44.0 38.1 49.4 51.3 13.3 12.9 49.1 25.4 I9.3 User Dc1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.7 42.6 42.6 44.0 38.1 49.4 51.3 :L3.3 12.9 49.1 25.4 19.3 LOS by Move: D D D D D D D B B D C B HCM2kAvgQ: 8 7 7 7 4 7 7 7 5 1 1.6 7 -A*.111Y1kA♦.114kRf#1iiI111ii11s 1-k*a1 lAl kk!*}'111Y1-#1Yi11nY1iAA-.A1A1•411 a11i 1: Note: Queue reporCed is the number of cars per lane. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb+project PM 'Tue Mar 31, 201_5 11:38:23 Page 1.4-1 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report :>_000 NCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection N6 W Lakeshore Or & Riverside or n+a.�rram e++a a,t+n>+rn>t+n.n+�nae+++r „ ,nt�nxtat,.+tnnnnn+e+xxx�nx.>+non snax.+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemont: L T R L T R L - T - R L - 'T - R ------------ I-... ------------- II --------------- II--------------- II-------- ---I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1. 0 1 1 0 1 0 2. 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 7. 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L 'T R L T R L T R ilLneInGrps: 1 2 1 2 1 1 ------------ ...------- _------ II --------------- II--------------- II ------------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 7.2 12 Crs swa l kW id: 8 8 8 8 8 Hev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0`. 09 0S 0� Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < . < < < < < < < Other . > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Inc7.ude Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II---------------- II____ -----------I HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 1 x....., xxxx 1 "'X= ........ 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx ------------ i --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II -------------I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln W i d Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxux 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1..00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxsz: 1.00 1.00 x..x_. n x xx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 RT Adj: XXxx 0.99 0.99 >:xxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx, xzsxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 LT Adj: 0.95 xxXe rxsxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx, xxssx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx PedBihe Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fn1 Sat Adj: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 ------------ ---------------- II--------------- II --------------- II -------------I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < , . , . < No > , , > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Signal Type: < � , <, < Actuated > > > > > > > > > , > , > > Delldj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 >+n,a��x+.+n,nesennx.ta �x�-kn++*.,i en w.nnn +nex ex „ exn+nn:+t+++n+t++a+nn..+nn+exee 'rraffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 DowllnQ Assoc_ Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Nub+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 L=age 14-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative >}�ii il-k-F*t3Y11-***a*il-4tl kt+-kll+�i'A 32* -F 43t++kS*1 �1+kX�'i Y�111#*+Y aaiilzAfAAAf A%# Intersection If(, W Lakeshore Er & Riverside Dr ...........YY..........Ak k"'4 ...... ........ii AI1A-k *'k....Y--3 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 11 - 1' - R L - T - R --------------- --------------- ----------- _____ Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.45 0.45 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 5.8 5.1 5.7. 5.3 3.1 5.0 4.8 6.3 4.4 0.9 14.1 6.2 Upstreamvc: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Q2: 2.2 1 1.7 1.7 0.7 2.1. 2.1 0.6 ().6 0.6 2.4 0-8 HCM21Queue: 8.0 6.9 6.9 7.1 3.8 7.1. 6.9 6.9 4.9 1.4 1.6.5 7.0 - --- --------------- --------------------... 70th3Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.1.8 1.18 1.Ili 1.20 1.17 1.18 HCM2k70thQ: 9.4 8.1 8.1 8.4 4.5 8.4 8.2 8.1 5.8 1.7 19.2 8.3 -------------- if --------------- II --------------- II 85th" actor: 1.53 1.54 1..54 1.54 1.56 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.56 1.59 1.47 1.54 HCN12k85thQ: 12.2 10.6 10.6 10.9 5.9 10.9 10.6 10.6 7.6 2.3 24.3 10.8 ----------- II---------------- 11---------- .... II 90th?Factor: L.67 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.73 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.71 1.77 1.58 1.68 HCM21P90thQ: 13.3 11.6 11.6 11..9 6.6 11.9 11.6 11.6 8.3 2.5 26.0 11.8 --------------- II--------------- II----------- ..--- Ii I 95th?Factor: 1.89 1.91 1.91 1.90 1.99 1.90 1.91 1.91 1.96 2.05 1.74 1.91 HCM21c95thQ: 1.5.0 13.1 13.1 13.5 7.5 13.5 13.2 13.1 9.5 2.9 28.7 13.4 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- li I 98th&Factor. 2.24 2.29 2.29 2.28 2.45 2.28 7_.29 2.29 2.39 2.60 1.98 2.28 HCM2k98thQ: 17.8 15.7 15.7 16.2 9.3 16.2 15.8 15.7 11..6 3.7 32.7 16.0 TralfIo 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. L,i.ccnsed to VA CON.SU'L'P IN(;, IRVINH east rAmbi Pro ject PM Tue Mar 31, 5?015 11:38:23 Page 14-3 ------------ .----- __.___--_..._______________.___---__.__---._.__--- Fael Consumption and Emissicns 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr ++.,,,..+..r..aexx....,....rxs,.>a+...++aa..+x++...n-. ...... ..x ues.a..i++.+...,....+ Approach: North Bound South Bound Last Bound West Bound M,vemenL: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------- II ---------------- II --------------- II____ ---_.__---_I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 52.7. 82.3 5.6 48.1 53.4 44.9 43.3 107 39.5 7.8 127 56.0 _..__---__.____________________________________________________________...__--_____-- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 11.1.986 pounds 18.142 gallons Carbon Dio�.ide: 349.397 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 27.633 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.072 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.263 pounds _._ ------------------------------------ _------------------- .-__---______--_.___---_____ Namc: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 111.986 pounds 18.7.42 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 349.397 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 27.633 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.072 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.263 pounds ___---_..------------------------------------------------------------------ DISCLAIMER The Fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCC and TRAPP'IX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traff!%: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVIN Exst+Amb+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.1.:38:23 Page 15-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) nw 611.xx+k x6a41a .+�-1116r c�kknil a+x+k++11x..+,.,....kkk-a+1a �.1.e+ia[kea+�, 611xn1 Intersection 10 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr 1+111111fi.ka.aaix++r6.a+++k+a111e.ar+k+e...+11+�>n..k#kaY�AAi kn11.1xna1 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical V01./cap-(z): 0.351 Loss Time (sec): B Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.7 Optimal Cycle: 25 Levc1. Of Service: A #1....Y>k+Yii,A k*+#1 saki I f*11 d d 1.111 f1 11146]+ I I I I I i I S k i.., t 1 41111 i*I*II AIIIII Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II ----------- II--------------- Control: ______________ControL Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include InClude Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1. 1 0 1 0 1, 1 0 ------------- I I--_-----I------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 0 9 28 0 1B 14 1020 3 11 741 25 Growth Adj: L 00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. Bse: 3 0 9 28 0 18 14 1020 3 11 741 25 User. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 0 9 28 0 18 14 1020 3 1.1. 741 25 Deduct VOL 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol:3 0 9 - 0 1B 14 1020 3 11 741 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ELF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fi naive)ume: 3 0 9 28 0 18 14 1020 3 11 741 25 ------------ -------------- ....II--------------- II--------------- II________ -____--I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/1-ane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.89 1._00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.25 0.00 0.75 0.61 0.00 0.39 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 422 0 1266 1062 0 683 1805 3599 11 1805 3475 117 ------------- I --------------- II---------------- II---------------- II_________ -.____-I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.01. 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: 1*`1 *kll ***l 1111 Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.81 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.80 Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.27 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.27 0.27 Uniform Uel: 48.3 0.0 48.3 43.9 0.0 43.9 47.5 2.6 2.6 48.6 2.7 2.7 Incremnt Del: 6.1 0.0 6.1. 1.6 0.0 1.6 2.8 0.1 0.1 6.7 0.1, 0.1 IRitQueUDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1_00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 54.5 0.0 54.5 45.6 0.0 45.6 50.3 2.7 2.7 55.3 2.7 2.7 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 54.5 0.0 54.5 45.6 0.0 45.6 50.3 2.7 2.7 55.3 2.7 2.7 LOS by Move: D A D D A IJ D A A E A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1. _ 0 , 1 5 5 1 3 3 k- 1 A 11 Y k 1 k k f+., 1 A N 1 f a 6 l a Y, I. ,, I 6 ..kk.4116,.#}}, k...... 1.a\i-.5fi h+,s;,kf a-SII.NSAR Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. #xAi11 1ta1.41Ykfa-A .1llikk±i66 k -a t6.1.-k*A1..1ahA-1.-.1i�1a1�A)A Ia1aAi'i1aA*k#a- '1'raffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assnc. Licenced to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Erst+Amb+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 16-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 ECM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ...i,+.+ >,.,......-, ......-................+............ ,...+.... �....,i .,... Intersection #7 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr .n a«+.+s>..x..>.as...<..z.x+...+tx...r,x...... F�.e xr,... �.,�....+... .«.a..,.e.. Approach: North Bound South Bound EassC Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- 11___________.____I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1, 0 1 1. 0 1 0 1 1. 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT j{LnsInGrps: 1 1 7. 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II--------- ....----- 11----------- .____I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 Crsswal kWid: 8 8 8 8 `` Hev von: 0 0 0 0 Grade: OV OB 01, 01, Parking/lir: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area ''type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > , . , , , , CnFt Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveR'P: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ---------- I--------------- 11_______________II_____....________-11______....________I ECM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 9 xxxx 9 9 xxxx 9 1 x...,., I i xi a 1 xxxx ,,xxx ---------- I --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II_______________.I HCH Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wi.d Adj: 1..00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxax 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 x..._n 1.00 1..00 xxxx 1.00 :L.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1..00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxyet 1.00 xz:zx 1.00 1.00 ..xxx 1..00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 %xxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.90 xxxx 0.90 0.95 xxxx 0.95 xxxx: 1.00 1.00 _:%x: 1..00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.97 x._..,. 0.97 0.95 x.,,zx 0.95 x„ -x -:vim .�v.� .... �. �-ti. .,.�x-,-,....,. PedBIde Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCH Sat Adj: 0.89 1..00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Usr .Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MI,F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fn1 Sat Adj: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1..00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ------------ --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- 11_________--____I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > _ _ > , , Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < . < Actuated > , , > , . , , , , DelAdj Pctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East+Anil) + Pro] Pct PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 16-2 ---- - __.....---------------------------._... _._._.______----- ___.__________ Level Of Serv,i '.(:e Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Or'erations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 1i7 High School. Entrance & Riverside Dr f 11 4 1 11111 x`I 11 II; IIk n 11) 1 I k II II .' II II 4I II I I I + ] 1 I I A I I I I I i\ 111 A I k 1*l**f III III II Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement.: 1, - ,. - R L -- T - R L, - T - R L - T - R ------------ -------------- ...II_. ---------------- II --------------- I I --------------- I Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.0E 0.03 0.81 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.80 Ar.riva I Type: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.4 4.0 4.0 0.3 2.9 2.9 GpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Par7.yArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 G.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 HCM2KQueue: 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.7 4.6 4.6 0.8 3.3 3.3 ------------ .--------------- II--------- __._.._--II--------------- II ----------___--I 70th; -Factor: 7..20 1.20 1.20 1.20 7..20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.i9 HCM2k70thQ: 0.9 0.0 0.9 2.7. 0.0 _.i 0.9 5.4 5.4 0.9 3.9 3.9 ------------ 1____...._.... -------- 11--------------- 11__.... ------------ 11___-_-__-------I 85thTFactor: 1..59 1.60 1.59 1.58 1.60 1.58 1.59 1.56 _.56 1.59 1.57 1.57 HCM2k85thQ: 1.3 0.0 1.3 2.7 0.0 2.7 1.2 7.1 7.1 1.2 5.1 5.1 ------------ -------------- ...II--------------- 11--------------- II_._......._....__....__.____I 90th=,,Factor: 1.78 1.80 7..78 1.77 1.80 1.77 1..79 7..72 1.72 1.79 1.79 1.74 HCM2L90thQ: 7..9 0.0 1.4 3.1 0.0 3.1, 1.3 7.8 '7.8 1.4 5.'7 5.7 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II--------- .....-_._......I 95th"Factor: 2.07 2.10 2.07 2.05 2.10 2.05 2.08 1..97 1..97 2.08 2.00 2.00 HCM21L95thQ: 1..6 0.0 1.6 3.5 0.0 3.5 7..5 9.0 9.0 1.6 6.5 6.5 _______....._._.__..._._____________--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 98thoFactor: 2.64 2.70 2.64 2.58 2.70 2.58 2.65 2.40 2.40 2.64 2.48 2.48 HCM2k98thQ: 2.1 0.0 2.1. 4.5 0.0 4.5 1.9 11.0 11..0 2.0 8.1 8.1 'Piaffix 8.0.071:5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINE. Exst+Amb+Project PM Pur Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 16-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 7000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 07 High School Entrance & Riverside Or Approach: North Bound .South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I, - T - R L - '1' - R L - T- R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II-._------------- Ron —------Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOf Stops: 0.7 0.0 6.6 0.0 9.3 3.9 68.6 0.2 2.7 98.1 1.6 __--._______________________. _.. _._.__-_______—______________ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 26.733 pounds 9.331 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 83.907 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.516 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.719 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.301 pounds -------------------------------- ..-__________...._.--________-._._..._.__________--------___ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 26.733 pounds 9.331. gallons Carbon Dioxide: 83.907 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.516 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.719 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.301 pounds ------------------------------------ .------------------------------ .._--________-_-.- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for genera]. planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIC. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 'Praffie 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East-i-AmbiProject PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 17-1. ___________.-____-____________---_-_--_-______--_-___--______ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) „ n,x-xr xrr,rrx+fir nxa+++aaaaae+asr nr nr 1"1 ranranrnrrr,.ri Intersection 148 .Stadium Way & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.336 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.6 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A z+rr,ar, F+w,,,�n+.r.+xxwx.r rr as«t>s ar r,unne>+n� „ na+rxra .+r+rsa„ rrr..rn a axrxr .Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside or Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R -T - R ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II_ -___-____-.__.--I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 _ 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II___._._._._...._.-... _..-__II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol.: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 998 2 10 696 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 998 2 1.0 696 50 User Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 998 2 10 696 50 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 996 _ 10 696 50 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 7..00 1..00 1.00 Pinalvolume: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 998 2 1.0 696 50 ._____._______--------------- il----------- ...--- II--------------- II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: .Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 ].ares: 1.00 0.00 1.00 i.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.87 0.13 Proal .Sat.: 1584 0 1584 1.805 0 1615 1805 3603 7 1805 3334 240 --------- ..._-I. --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.21. 0.21 Crit Moves: n"'* '"*' AAAl 1,1+ Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.83 0.83 0.02 0."7'7 0.7"7 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.28 0.27 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 Uniform Del: 49.4 0.0 48.6 45.0 0.0 44.0 44.3 2.1. 2.1 48.6 9.2 3.2 I ncremntDel: 3.5 0.0 5.5 1.8 0.0 :1.3 1.2 0.1 0.1 6.6 0.1 0.1 I nitQueu Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 Delay/Veh: 52.9 0.0 54.1 46.8 0.0 45.3 95.4 2.2 2.2 55.2 3.3 3.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1./Veh: 52.9 0.0 54.1 46.8 0.0 45.3 45.4 2.2 2.2 55.2 3.3 3.3 LOS by Move: D A D D A D D A A E A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 4 4 1 3 3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane_ Traffi>_ 8.0.0"715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb-i-Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 18-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCP Operations Method Base Volume Alternative xi..x........... Intersection #B Stadium Way & R.tverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: I. - T - P. I, It R L T R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ----- ...---------- II--------------- !I ----- ------I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR L .",xcx R ):.. RT RT L RT RT JfLnsInGrps: 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 ------------ I --------------- II_-... ------------ II--------------- II -- --------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 7.2 12 12 .IS 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 Hev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 07 OT O111r 01-1, Parking/Hr: He No No No Bus Stp/Hr.: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < _, < < < < 111 < < Other > > > > > > , > > , , , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Exclusi.veRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 --------- I --------------- !I --------------- --------------- --------------- HCM --------II__---------II------------ HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(IL) Case: 9 xxxx 9 1 >..,....xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx --------- I -------------- ...II --------------- II--------------- II---------- -I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 rxxx 1.00 1.00 x_..... 1. 00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 :':Xxx 1..00 1.00 xxc:c 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 ......a 1..00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xx::x 1.00 ..„.,x xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 :1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 Xczx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 axxx 0.89 ..._.,.. 0.85 ...._.a 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.95 xxxx xxxx r: 0.95 y, x.,_, xxxzz 0.95 xxxx xxs;xx PedBike Adj: 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 1..00 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1..00 1.00 .1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ent Sat Adj: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.99 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ------------I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < , < < < < < . < , < < , < No - , . > > > > .> ,> > > . , , > > > Signal Type: < < < , < 11 . . < _ < < Actuated > > . > . > > , . . . . . DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1\00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Traffic 8.0.0'/15 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East+Ambi-Project PM Tuc Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Page 18-2 I.evel Of Service Detailed Computation Report (11CM2000 queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative t.ii�li*i-h#iIAAAJ#S-k�,1 F*1.... 11111111111"..1. „ .. ...... „ A,�AAal,i \kAA Intersection #8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr k I I I „ I t I I II 111 f i,, A . . . . . . . . . 1 a 1 " ..+,,k11.ee-ee,I1 I taeIx +_lxxaf+Ai Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'T - R 1, - Y' - R L - T - R ------------ ._...------------- II--------------- II ----------- ...--- II --__-____-_____I Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.83 0.83 0.02 0.77 0.77 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prod Factor: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 7_00 1.00 Ql: 0.7. 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 3.5 3.5 0.3 3.1 3.1 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 Q2: 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 HCM2AQucue: 0.4 0.0 0.7 1.5 0.0 1.2 1.2 4.0 4.0 0.7 3.5 3.S ------------ --------------- .II--------------- II--------------- II ----_-______-__I 70th1Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 11CM2k70thQ: 0.5 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.0 1.5 1.5 4.8 4.8 0.8 4.1 4.1 .__.---------- --------------- II-------- .....------- II--------------- - -I 85th&Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.59 1.59 :L.60 1.59 1.59 1.56 1.56 1.59 1.57 1.57 HCM2k85thQ: 0.6 0.0 1..7. 2.3 0.0 1.9 2.0 6.3 6.3 1.1 5.5 5.5 ------------ --------------- II------------- ......II__... ------------- II -___-_-----_---I 90th&,Factor: 1.79 1.80 1.79 1.77 1..80 1.78 1.78 1.73 1.73 1.79 1.74 1.74 HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 0.0 1.2 2.6 0.0 7.0 7.0 1.3 6.0 6.0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II_.___.....__...__...._.__.._II__.__...._--__-__--I 95th,Factor: 2.09 2.10 2.08 2.05 2.10 2.06 2_06 1.98 1.98 2.08 1.99 1.99 HCM2k95thQ: 0.8 0.0 1.4 3.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 8.0 8.0 1.5 6.9 6.9 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -------________I 98th5',Factor: 2.67 2.70 2.65 2.59 2.70 2.61 2.61 2.43 2.43 2.65 2.47 2.47 HCM2F:98thQ: 1..0 0.0 1.6 3.8 0.0 3.2 3.2 9.8 9.8 1.9 8.6 B.6 Traffic: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. ,Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRV1NF Grist+Ambi Project PM Toe Mar 31, 2015 11:38:23 Pane 18-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 1#.Y,.,-hii♦..y, f, 3i 2, I I k I I.x I A I, I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t4 hf l,Aird kl.adF,tLAl1Aw#iY ,. Lntersecti_on 1W Stadium Way & Riverside or ......,.....x« ..,.......... Approach: North Hound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movemont: L- T- R L T R L T R L- T- R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- Run ---- — ---Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numofstops: 0.7 0.0 2.2 8.9 0.0 7.6 7.8 60.2 0.1. 2.5 99.7 3.6 ______________________._--_________--_-----______-.___.--___________--------____ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 27.902 pounds 9.520 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 87.053 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.899 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.791 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.313 pounds --------------------------- _.--- ._._________--_-----_________-...--___________-_._.----___ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 27.902 pounds 9.520 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 87.053 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.899 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.791 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.31.3 pounds ----- ________________._----_______----________--------_---- —__---------------- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFi%. Ne'Cwork models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSUL'1'ING, IRVINE li:ast+Amb+Cumu+project AM Tuo Mar 37., X015 10:82:57 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Ezst+Amb+Cumul.+Project AM Command: Vol. ume: Geometry: Tmpact, Lee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Default Conunand Default Volume Default Geometry Default Tmpact Pec Default 'Trip Generation Default 'Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration Traffi.a. 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE, Gast+Amo+Cumin i Project AM Too Mar 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 2-1 -------------------..._______________---------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Lrterscct.on Base Del/ V/ LOS Veh C If 1 Grand Ave & Machado St A 9.5 0.410 It 2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave B 12.8 0.113 tt 3 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave C 21.7. 0.536 4 Grand Ave & Macy St A 4.5 0.678 it 5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr D 47.0 0.968 If 6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr C 26.7 0.620 If 7 High School Entrance & Riverei 6 15.5 0.537 If 8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr B 1B.1 0.455 Future Change Del/ V/ Ill LOS Veh C A 9.5 0.410 -I- 0.000 V/C B 12.8 0.113 + 0.000 D/V C 21.1 0.536 + 0.000 D/V A 4.5 0.678 .1. 0.000 D/V D 47.0 0.968 + 0.000 D/V C 26.7 0.620 1- 0.000 D/V B 15.5 0.537 + 0.000 D/V B 18.1 0.455 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dealing Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East -IAmb+Cumui PProj ecC AM 'iue Mar 31, 2.015 10:42:58 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 IICM 4 -Way Stop Method (ease Volume Alternative) Intersection if] Grand Ave r Machado St Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.410 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9-5 Optimal Cycle. 0 Level Of Service: A h*1#Ikk#*l}+��-F'k1'k1�i 1. Yi3]AA1#+k#*1 AA%#Ai ]zi+liv k* -A k1'ii *k2***f tai***-A'i Ott+i-+ Street Name: Grand Ave Machado St Approach: North Bound .South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R - T - R L - T - R L - 'T - R ------------ ---- .....---------- --....------------ II-... ------------- II ------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 -._ ----------- i--------------- II__... ------------ II-.... ------------- II_._ ----- Volume Module: Base Vol.: 302 88 100 225 2 2 1 2 106 1 28 > 2 Growth Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 302 88 100 225 2 21 2 106 1 28 o User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 "':XX. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 27 88 100 225 1 � 28 � 0 2 0 106 � Roduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 27 88 100 225 2 1 2 106 1. 28 PCE Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 2 27 88 1.00 225 2 2 1 11.06 1 28 ------------ --------------- I i-- -------------- I--------------- I ---- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 tares: 0.02. 0.23 0.75 0.30 0.69 0.01 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.78 0.01 0.21 Final Sat.: 14 195 624 244 548 5 268 Ulf, 268 540 5 143 ------------ I -- 11- -----Ii--------------- II -----I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 14 0.14 0.14 0.41 0.91. 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.01. 0.20 0.2.0 0.20 Cri.t Moves: *"..". *"'+a I'll +ax+ Delay/Veh: 7.8 78 7.8 10.4 10.4 10.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 9.0 9.0 9.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjD2l./Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 10.4 10.4 10.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 9.0 9.0 9.0 LOS by Move: A A A B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.8 10.4 7.9 9.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 ApprAd?Del: 7.8 10.4 7.9 9.0 LOS by Appr: A B A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Note: Queue reported is the nujnoe.r of cars per lane. *�i�fa�k-F -kfiAt A?f%AY#ik#*AiA)X*l**.�1\+f'1+i11r�aky,}-G�yiiiY#h* bra}{ki:-A-1-F lk XA+ Traffio 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE EXst1A1lh+Cumu1+Pro3ect AM The Mar 31, 2015 1.0:92:58 Page, 9-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report '-000 HCH 9 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative e+xr+«sx. -ate++rm re. c -a ,aaax+n+e��aksx.a+,Aa +�+w.a.rae+�saa ex+�......+ax+w ��xxn-aa Intersection 01 Grand Ave & Machado St 11r+e+mn+s*111........+mx+rx-. .......xi�a.�t++ix�a, ..x++-.,...... Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound H,voiiie u-: ----------- I L - 11' - R ---------------- L - T - P L - T - R L - T - R Time Period: 0.25 hour ---------------- ---------------- ._____.___________ HevVeh: 0 Og 0S Oe, Alpha Value: ----------- 0.01 GroupType: ---------------- I---------------- 1 I------ 1 i 1 P[Cl]: 0.99 0.70 0.92 0.51 P[C2]: 0.33 0.)1 0.09 0.00 P[C3): 0.1.1, 0.16 0.31, 0.93 P[C9]: 0.08 0.03 0.12 0.06 P[CS]: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Padj[Cl]: 0.008 0.005 0.012 0.010 Padj[C21:-0.001 0.001 0.005 0.005 Padj[C3]: -0.003 -0.005 -0.009 -0.012 Padj[C9]: -0.005 -0.002 -0.007 -0.003 Padj[C5]: ----------- .------------ -0.000 ...--- -0.000 -0.001 -0.000 Lane: Ll ---------------- ---------------- L1. I______._______.___I Ll L1 LaneType: ----------- .------------ LEFTTHRURITE ._--- LEFTTHRURITE LEETT HR0RITF, LEFTTHRURITE HeadwayAdj: -0.996 ---------------- ---------------- 0.057 I____________. -0.160 -___I 0.033 Volume: 117 327 5 135 Capacity: 833 797 670 688 DegOfUtil: 0.19 0.90 0.01 0.18 DepHeadway: 9.15 9.92 9.88 9.89 ServiceTime: 2.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 Delay: 7.8 10.9 7.9 9.0 Queue: ----------- .---------------- 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.2 Approach: ----------- ---------------- North Bound ----------------- I ---------------- South Bound I________________I East Bound West Bound ApproachDel: 7.8 -------- ._------- I ---------------- 10.9 I._______._______.__I 7.9 9.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.8 10.9 '7.9 9.0 LOS by Appr: A 13 A A Ove,rallDel: 9.5 OVeraJILOS: A Traffic 8.0.0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE G;:st+Amb+Cuntul-i-Project AM Tue. Mar 31, 2015 10:42:56 ;Paye 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report Ttaf£ix £3.0.0715 (c) 2009 Dowling Asset. Licensed 'Co VA CONSULTING, TRVINP. 2000 11CM Ursignai.i.zed Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection C' Grand Ave F Riverside Ave ,-a-.-n- Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.£37 Street Name: Grand Ave Riverside Dr Apprpach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __________ Control: .__.._____________II Uncontrolled --------------- II--------------- Uncontrolled Stop Sign 1:--_____________I Stop Sign Rights: Snclude Include Include include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 --------------- 0 0 0 __________I_______________ Volume Module: II___ -----... 11--------------- II I Base Vol: 20 244 0 0 431 39 51 0 93 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial. Bse: 20 244 0 0 431 34 51. 0 43 0 0 0 User Ad) : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 PH[' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH@ Volume: 20 244 0 0 431 34 51 0 43 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 cinalVolume: 20 244 0 0 431 34 51 0 43 0 0 0 ------------ Critical. Gap --------------- II----- Module: ....--------- II_______________II____......_..____.____.I Critical Gp: 4.1 x.,,,.., xxxxx xxxx xxmx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 x:<xxx x..,;.. .,...,x, LollowUpTim: 2.2 x..,.,. xxxxx x ........ ......x xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 x....,.,. ....__.I I.____ --_-__-_--_I ...,.... _....__. Capacity Module: --------------- II--------------- II------------ Cr, fIdct Vol: 465 xxxx xxxxx %,xx- :.xxxx 569 7:2 233 ...,x .; _._.._. .. _.,._. Potent Cap.: 1107 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 457 351 "776 xxxx xX.x ..xXx., Move Cap.: 11.07 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 451 344 776- dr xx - - Vol umo/Ca p: 0.02 xxxx ... xxxx xxxx .xxx •xxx. .�--- 0.11 0.00 0.06 _--- _xxx .,.:a --- ---- Level Of Serv].ce Module: 2way95 t};Q: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx r.xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx so -,/,x ........ ....... x Control DeL £3.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx{x xxxxx .,Weis �...,.:.•.. dde,8.t .,.,_...n .: .•.... ......xx ,�_..... ns.... LOS by Move: A * * * " ' ` ' r " Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: e.;xx xxxx ,xxxxx ..., xxxxx; .�..., x�.xo xxxxx x...._ .,.ann � xxY. ,.: _...,-.x ...,�..... ........ . ..,..., ,.xt. ,:x S ha radQueae: xxxx x xt_.. xx,-.xx •- xzx x o,c xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx ... ... .. ...:. :. :.,..:.. Sh rd ConDe] � �< `.xxxx -- xxxx ,,,., ..ar:x vxxxv ,.. xxxxx 12.8 xrx>:x .. ...... ....... Shared LOS: + x x a z a 1 B Approa ch De l: xxxxxx .,....e,..., 128...,.....,.. Approach LOS: ' " B " Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per. lane. Ttaf£ix £3.0.0715 (c) 2009 Dowling Asset. Licensed 'Co VA CONSULTING, TRVINP. East+AmG+Cumul+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 20].5 10:9"1.:58 Page 6-7 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignali.zed Method Rase Volume Alternative �♦#i Alk**#}1Y41k*#iiYt4\�#{#i �i la k***--AAl�lk �?'Y�1ii-k**yxiak%+**#-#-A Af�i>l#'YfllAlAf Intersection 42 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave �e +a++s>+xaxx+r+ax++xrf+asr+. x,�,xx+a.+r �ex+wa+.. xe+x+e „ +sza�mr♦<,txm+xa. <sxns Approach: North Round South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement.: _---------- I ---------------- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - k 1, - 'I - R HevVeh: Or I ---------------- 01,11 --------.--------I Oo — -----------I 03 Grade: Oo 04: Oo 011, Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 9.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 1.2 feet 12 feet .12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour. 'fir ffia: 8.0.077.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE' Exst+AmbrCwnul+Project AM Tie Mar 3i, 201'i 10:42:58 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) +.�x..r..+..w.aa......♦+r.m...a+,+++..r.......+-+x,t�a Intersection #3 SR 74/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave e....s..+...+.x............... .>+sa>+.,,.�.a..n.+,.,, Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol ./Cap.(X): 0.536 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.1 Opt mal Cycle: 29 Ievel OfService: C Street Name: SR 74/Riverside Dr Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --I--------------- 11 ---11-----ii- ----I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 00 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- 11____.-__-__...---- II_.�------- ... _.---- II------- _.-_-I Volume Module: Base Vol.: 180 656 0 0 762 79 164 0 311 0 0 0 Growth Adj: :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 180 656 0 0 762 79 7.64 0 311 0 0 U User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 111F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 180 656 0 0 762 79 1.64 0 3,11 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 656 0 0 762 79 164 0 311 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Fi.na.lVolume: 180 656 0 0 762 79 1.64 0 31.1 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- --- -II_____ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1..00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1..00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1..00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final, Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3610 1615 3502 0 161.5 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11-_-_ II_-___ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grit Moves: *111 I'll ..,. Green/cycle: 0.19 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.12 0.13 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del.: 36.8 10.8 0.0 0.0 23.3 19.3 21.5 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1, 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQuouDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 1 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 38.5 10.8 0.0 0.0 23.7 19.4 21.6 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1 .00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1_00 1.00 AdjDel./Veh: 38.5 10.8 0.0 0.0 23.7 1.9.4 21.6 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D B A A C B C A C A A A 11CM2kAvaQ: 6 5 0 0 10 2 _ 0 8 0 0 0 .+... .,x... ,.. a ........o -......a...... �,�,.....,.�r, .-e. .. �_,..n _,_i , .. ,:>x��..e.� Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Tlaffi:r 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Liccused to VA CONSULT N G, IRVINE Exst+Amb+CumuliProject AM Tue Marr 31, 2015 1.0:92:58 Page 8-1 Level. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ,..........ix+>e.. Intersection 10 SR 74/Riverside Dr zi Grand Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I._ -------------- II --------------- II. --------------- II________._______I HCM Ops Adjusted vane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 _ 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: L T x.::X •.x T 2 I ___x R _.... ..ten0 0 ......0 H LnsInGrps: 1 .. 0 0 ]. 2 0 1 0 0 0 I---------------- II --------------- II--------------- II________._______I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 1- 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWi d: 8 B 8 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0.% 08 0`% 08 Parkl.ng/lir: No No Ho No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < . < Other . , > > > . . . .> , > , , , Cnft Fed/Hr: 0 0 0 0 E%;clusiveR'P: Include Include Include Include 8 RT PrtcL: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II__.._ ------------ II--------------- II_____.__________I HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: 1 x>:>:>: zxx:,: xxxx xxxx,: -xXxx 1 xxxx v--xxxx ----- - -- - -- HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx _._...x 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00sxx xxxx x . xxsa Hev Vol) Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ...,.x 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx x xxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 Parking Adj: xx,,,,. 1.00 x x xxxx ",Xxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1..00 xxxx xxxx r:xxx:. Bus Stp Adj : :..._.x 1.00 x, xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 x. . x x xxxx x xXoz Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 x..x=, xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx x'!,%:i ., _.., _, x RT Adj: ........ .xxx .xax 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx LT Adj: 0.95 r:x;:::,:xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x.. ...� PedBi_ke Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1..00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1..00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II_.______________I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinatod: . _ _ < < 1 1: , < 1, < _ , , . No > . > > . > , > _ , Signal 'Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > : . > > > > > DelAdj Fctr: 1 00 1 O7 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ti affix 8.0.071.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE ERst+Amb+Cumuli Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 8-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (13CM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume A1Cernative +,,,.........,,,,...+.a,,-n.. r ....... Intersection #3 SR 74/Riverside Dr L Grand Ave +-r+,x.x>+z+, xi.�xaa.,,<.e.o-.e,-�a,.a.+ „ � xxn x �+,.�o-n...,•�x.«+aa,a�nxx«++,x,a,�+ Approach: North Bound South Bound Last Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I_._____ _11_____________..._11___ __.__II---------------- Green/Cycle: ----Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactcr: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Q1: 4.5 4.9 0.0 0.0 8.6 1.4 1.6 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dpst.reamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q2: 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.]. 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM2KQueue: 5.6 5.4 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.5 1.7 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II-- 70thoFactor: 1. 19 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.20 1_20 1.20 1.18 7..20 1.2.0 1.20 HCM2k70thQ: 6.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 11..4 1 H 2.1 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ 1--------------- 11----------------- 11--------------- __..._--- 85th-�Factor: 1.55 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.52 1.58 1.58 1.60 1.53 1.60 1.60 1.60 HCM2k85thQ: 8.7 B.3 0.0 0.0 14.7 2.4 2.7 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II----------------- 11______--_______I 90th�Factor: 1.70 7..71 1.80 1.80 1.65 7..77 1.77 1.80 7..67 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k90thQ: 9.6 9.2 0.0 0.0 15.9 2.7 3.1 0.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ --------------- II------- ..-------- jj--------------- 11_______________1 95th,Facton 1.94 1.95 2.10 2.10 1.85 2.05 2.05 2.10 1..89 2.10 2.10 2.10 HCM12k.9SthQ: 10.9 10.4 0.0 0.0 17.9 3.2 3.5 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .------------ I----------- .__--II___----_.__--___11_______________li___--_ -I 98th�Factor: 2.35 2.36 2.70 2.70 2.7.7 2.59 2.58 2.70 2.24 2.70 2.70 2.70 HCM2k98thQ: 13.2 12.7 0.0 0.0 21.1 4.0 4.4 0.0 17.9 0.0 0-0 0.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb+Cumul+Project AM The Mar 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 8-3 ---------------------------------------------------------- Fuel _______________________________________.__-___Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operati.ons Method Base Volume Alternative >...��aamx........................... n.a+..e++.+....a........-x.n. Intersection H3 SR 79/Riverside Dr s Grand Ave w..apt+.....++rar...e ................a.x.....=e...e. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Rnnnrl Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------- II --------------- II --------------- il__-_-__-_-__-_-I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfSfops: 90.7 89.1 0.0 0.0 196 12.6 27.5 0.0 61.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 ______._____.__________________________--_.__-______-____--_______..._--_____ Name: year 1.995 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 57.659 pounds 9.390 gallons Carbon Di o;:ide: 179.880 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 13.802 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.905 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.662 pounds _._________________---------------------------------------------- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 57.659 pounds 9.390 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 179.880 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 13.802 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.905 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.662 pounds _______________________________________________________________.__-_-_-__________ DISCLAIMER The fuel. consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only ,for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection withill the CCG and TRAPFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and ocher system elements_ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb+Cumuli Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 I -ICM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 99 Grand Ave & Macy St ��,....�.-..,,,�„ .....» ..,+..a...�.+.a..x«�..... ..+n...a.�.cn... s«+max+sax...+. Cycle (sec): 60 Critical. Vol./Cap.(X): 0.678 Loss Time (sec): B Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.5 optimal. Cycle: 92 Level Of Service: A xs........................... x........ x..xss+sxe.sx Street (dame: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: North Bound .South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II.--------------- I --------------- ConCrol: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: lnclude Include Include Include We. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 9.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ---------------- .11--------------- .11--------------- 11---- ..._-____.----I Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 759 0 0 1053 30 30 0 54 2 0 0 Growth Adj: 1..00 1.00 1-00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bar: 9 759 0 0 1053 30 30 0 54 2 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 759 0 0 1053 30 30 0 54 1 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 759 0 0 1,053 30 30 0 54 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 759 0 0 1053 30 30 0 54 2 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II-------- II--------------- II_ ----_-____-__-I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. Adjustment: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01. 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 22 1861 0 0 1900 1615 1900. 0 1615 1900 0 0 .__.-._________I ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_ ----__________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.41 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ."s.a .x.m Green/Cycle: 0.82 0.82 0-00 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.6B 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del.: 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.0 27.5 0.0 28.1 27.7. 0.0 0.0 TncremntDel: 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 21.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 1.9 I.9 0.0 0-0 3.5 1..0 29.5 0.0 99.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.5 1.0 29.5 0.0 49.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A C A D C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 ., 0 0 9 0 1 0 .. 0 0 0 .+. ..c....x ,. .,_....,..........x.......xex.x+�i�._........... x..., .....�. i+... Note: Queue ropnrted is the num6cr of cars per lane. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE F1:5t1N11b+Cumul+Project AM 'Due. Mar 31, I 7.0:92 58 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative *xA**i}#:F**f Yi.t*fa%T'A AAf##4e *......Yxf .*... .Ak*-. .....-.. .......A#%'s#F##.tA Intersection N9 Grand Ave & Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound M,vIwe11L: L - T - R 1. - 'L - 11 L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 7, 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: LT LT xxxx LT IT R LT LT R L xxcx c ifLnsinGros: 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 ---------- I ------------ ...__11 --------------- II...-------------- 11-------- ..._-_---I HCM Ops Input Saturation All Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 7.2 12 12 12 12 12 C,rsswalkWid: 8 8 II 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0 f 011, 0'11 0� Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < c < L < c < < < < < Other > � , > . > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExC.lusiveRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- 11._.____-----_____I HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: 5 5 xr."xx .,..._x 5 XXXu xxxa 2 n,...,. xxxx ------------ I --------------- 11 ---------- ....---- 11--------------- 11_...._____________1 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln slid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxx:,:x xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 x..,.., 1.00 1.00 x .. xxxx xxxa Hev Veh Adj : 1.00 1.00 xxxx, ,xxxxx 7..00 1.0S 1..00 xxxx 1 .00 1.00 r,xxY, -.xxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xx,x 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx; 1.00 1.00 xxx:x xxxxx Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxx, xxxx 1.00 xxxx ,.,_,.n 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx x.,.,., 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxa xxxxx Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1-00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ,xxxx RT Adj: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.85 ._....;: xx,x 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx L'P Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xti c- x:, �x x 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx s._, PedBike Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 7..00 0.85 7..00 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLI" Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.99 0.99 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1..00 0.85 1..00 1.00 1.00 ------------ 1--------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- II_______________I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < c < < No > > > > . > > > > > , , , > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated , . > , . > > > , , i, > > De.lAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 traa x.�s+ssee+ir+�+s+e++>atm+xsa++aa.eexa,�s.itx+a,�aa..+.x+��.tax«d +.a x.,e+a�+r++sr Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE L'•,st+AmhiCumul+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 201.5 10:42:58 Page 10-2 -------- ------------------._----_ ______________._---_ Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted __...-_--_ Left Turn Sat Adj) ._.... 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative +11111x111 -k Alli n,ti #.......... I I. 4 I I I+,,, 1 s I I I , , ,tk......... LA}ii„ �1AA3 \af�i1 I:ntersecti.cn X14 Grand Ave & Macy St 1*111)11-P'111A....#i1...... #A 1lfli1�1111111'k.......#.fii.1A 4S**x>IAI A-).}iAY1 AAA Approach: North South East W c s t Cycic length, C: 60 .,...,.,.,.. 60 60 Actual Green ime Per Lane Group, G: 49.09 ....,,...__. 2.96 2-96 Effective Green 'Time Per Lane Group, q: 49.04 xxxxxx 2.96 2.96 Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 49.04 ..._>rxx 2.96 2.96 Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: I ..--.,.•_.. 0 I. Number Of Lanes I:n Lane Group, N: 1 ,.xxns;; ]. 1 Adjusted Left. -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 9 xx=-.e 30 2 Prepay -tion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt: 0.01 xxxx.:a 1.00 1.00 Propor :ion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: ,,.,zxxxx x x 11 X .. 1.00 x Left Turns Ver Cycle, LTC: 0.15 x a X x,. 0.50 0 03 Ad7usfed Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 1053 0 30 Opposing Piov Per Lane Per Cycle, Vole: ].7.55 _. 0.00 U.110 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 ,..,xxXx 1-00 1.00 Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 4.00 6`f grn mrtil arrival of left -turn car, gf: 33.78 xxx}:x:i 0.00 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.18 xszxxx 0.95 0.95 Gff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 11.45 _...n.,.,.. 0.00 0.00 Gff urn while left turns filter thru, gu: 15.26 �. ��1•v v.. .�._...:X1-1 2.96 2.96 Ma. opposing cars arriving during gq-g f, n: x a Y. xxv. rxax ;c.: 0.00 X c x:-: Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: `` x,xx xecXHx 0.00 Left -turn Saturation Factor, fs: 0.22 xxxxxx XX:=': 0.86 proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl.: 0.01 xxxxxx 1..00 1.00 Through -car Equivalents, ell.: 3.91 x}:xxx£ 1.40 1.35 Siuylc Lane Through -car Equi.valents, ell: M."ea '+ .-= 1..00 .:; Minimum Left 'Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 0.09 XXXXXX 1.35 i.35 Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.99 xxxxxx. 1.00 1.00 Left Turn Adjustment tactor, fit: 0.99 X c 100 1.00 -h 11A1t FRf+i1d11++11?11#,1111]*dr1111L#d111kY11d 1411*+1111 1 1111 +Y+,x1114111111 lr.rfIi_x 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVI:NF. F:St+Amb+Cumul+Project AM Tue May 31, 2015 10:92:58 Paqe 10-3 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection ;f9 Grand Ave n Macy St ..a.....ae.....................ens.....+x..........x. Approach: NOrth Bound South Bound F,,,t Round West Pound Movement: L - T - R l - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ------------ .___II----------------- II_______________I Green/Cycle: 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Arri.val'Type: 3 3 3 3 Frog Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 01: 3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.7. 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreaniAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Q2: 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 l.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 I1CM2KQueue: 4.9 4,9 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ --------------- II__._____________II---------------- II__________.._____I 70th"�Factor: 1.^:.9 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.7.8 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.20 14CM2k70thQ: 5.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.7. 1.1 0.0 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 ____________I ______----------------- 85th%Factor: 1.55 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.52 1.60 1.59 1.60 1.58 1.60 1.60 1.60 HCM2k85thQ: 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.0 19.0 0.2. 1.5 0.0 3.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 ------------ I--------------- II ______ I__________ II_______________I 90thoFactor: 1.71 1.71 1.80 1.80 1.65 1.80 1.78 1.80 1.76 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k90thQ: 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 15.2 0.2 1.7 0.0 9.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 ------------ I---------------- II ----------------- 95th8Factor: 1.96 1.96 2.10 2.10 1.86 2.10 2.07 2.10 2.03 2.10 2.10 2.10 HCM2k95thQ: 9.7 9.7 0.0 0.0 17.2 0.2 1.9 0.0 9.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 ------------ ----- ._--------- II_______________II--------------- 11.-______________I 98th°Factor: 2.38 2.38 "2.70 2.70 2.19 2_.69 2.63 2.70 2.59 2.70 2.70 2.70 HCM2k98thQ: 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 20.2 0.3 2.9 0.0 5.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 Traffi.s 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling A,5soc. licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st+limbi-CumuIi Protect AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 10-4 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 1. I I I I I A I I i.. 1, A.,,* +......r3_. 1 1 1 a 2{.., F t i ka k h 1,. I I + , k k Y1...... ...... Intersection H4 Grand Ave & Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - _ - R ------ I ---- 11 --------------- 1! _____ - I I— ------- Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numof Stops: 0.7 SB -5 0.0 0.0 108 1.4 7.2 0.0 13.3 0.'i 0.0 0.0 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 27.980 pounds 4.533 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 87.298 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.770 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.735 pounds Nitrogen oxides: 0.330 pounds -..._____-_.________________.____---__ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 27.980 pounds 4.533 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 87.298 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.770 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.735 pounds Nit,roaen Oxides: 0.330 pounds DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersecti.on within the CCG and 'IRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Piaffix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. licensed to VA CONSULTING, TRVINE DxstfAmb+Cumul+Project AM Tue Mar 31., 2015 10:42:58 Page 11-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 11CM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(Y): 0.968 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/vah): 47 0 optimal Cycle: 159 Level Of Service: D Street Name: Lincoln St Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Last Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L -- T - n L - T - R L - 11' - R ------------ ----------- 11 --------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------- .----------- ._--- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 385 0 290 172 860 0 0 740 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ise: 0 0 0 385 0 290 172 860 0 0 740 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHL Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHE Volume: 0 0 0 385 0 290 172 860 0 0 "740 62 Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 0 0 0 385 0 290 172 860 0 0 740 62 PCE Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 5.00 1_00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PinalVolune: 0 0 0 385 0 290 172 860 0 0 740 62 ------------ ---- ...---------- II---------------- II --------------- II__ ----___-----.-I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.43 1..00 1..00 0.00 0.00 0. 9.., 0.08 Final .Sat.: 0 0 0 992 0 747 1805 1900 0 0 1736 145 ------------ I -------------- ...II--------------- II--------------- II._ --------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol./Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.10 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 Crit Moves: Axa, I'll 11m+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 0.0 29.3 44.9 19.4 0.0 0.0 27.3 27.3 Incremnt Del: 0.0 0-0 0.0 26.2 0.0 26.2 57.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 23.6 23.6 In i. t QueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1..00 0.00 1_00 1..00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1-00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.5 0.0 55.5 102.7 25.7 0.0 0-0 50.8 50.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 0.0 55.5 102.7 25.7 0.0 0.0 50.8 50.8 LOS by Move: A A A E A E T C A A D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 26 0 26 9 24 0 0 30 30 xx-a+,.i ee a, u,..x+a.rr+xw=+.�a�++nsxn++a�.+>tr.�.�a ,.e ,ne♦iex+nax��„ .axxnx,r.xe Note: queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 'Sraffia 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exeti- Amb -i-Cumin+Projact AM Tue But 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 7.2-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 BCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 145 Lincoln St a Riverside or Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------- ..._.____II --------------- II ---------------I HCM Ops Adjusted ,Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1, 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lano Group: _ cx'-. LTR LTR LTR L T ..._.... PT RT ALnsInGrps: 0 0 0 1. 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 ------------ I --------------- li--------------- II --_____________11 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 7.2 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 % Hev Veh: 0 U 0 0 Grade: 0,11, O;S 04 0€ Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < " < _ < < Other , - - > . > > > . , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Tnclude Include S RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1------- .__...._.__.__II --------------- II--------------- 11_______________1 HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: xxxx xxxx. _"_..,_. 9 ,:xx. 9 1 x...... ._x._.. xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- 11.. -------------- 11--------------- II_______________I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: xxxx xxxr: x>a:,;x 7..00 x::x;: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1..00 Hev Veh Adj: xxxx xxxx x x x a a 1.00 x::::x 1.00 7..00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: xxxx x.._,." xxxxx 1.00 xr:xx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxxx xxxr: xxxax 1.00 1.00 ..x_x 1.00 x.xx.'. xxxx 1.00 1.00 ,.,r.... 1.00 1.00 x 7..00 Bus Stp Ad2: xxx:c �" �-"���' xr;x, axl:xv, xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: xxxx ox". -la III xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --- x xra 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xr:xxx 0.99 x_...., 0.99 xxxx xxxx x..xxx xxxx 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: h:➢.RS, x:-:xx Xxx2°x 0.97 vvyr: 0.97 0.95 s,xxx .ycx xxxr: xxxx xxxxx PedBi.ke Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11CM Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1..00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II__......._.____._.__...__11--------------- I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated; < < < < < < I <, < , . < No > > I , I . > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < � < < Actuated > I > . , ? > > . > > > DelAdj Fctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 m.,a eestxexx.n.rx��x+ia<++.++ a�aexw.+,x,,.�xe +ea ra ifi r�ra�ieaz«m.+ «sa+rx+x+«.+rx Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E>sst+Amb-iCumullProject AM The Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 12-2 ________________________._._--_______________._------_______________...... Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (IICM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative **�l1At+*}y�p��x y.x�i,}AAL+-k1*xt FA ki k+] -k 1Atl*kN*liyii�k**#A1Allii-a laila.+x.Alnk l -.A Intersection #5 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr +xa.axxaxx. xxxxax+x+xaxx++xrn�,aa+�xxn+>rxxxx+nxx u.x++xx �+rex.�x.�a,a�wa+.max+r. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L - T - R L - '1' - R L - '1' - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------- -II ----------I Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 Arrival'Pype: 3 3 3 3 ProgFacCor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ql: 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 18.4 4.8 20.1 0.0 0.0 21.7 21.7 ❑nstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 7.9 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 HCM2KQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 26.2 9.1 24.4 0.0 0.0 30.2 30.2 ...._._---______I--------------- I I--------------- 1 ------- ...------- I I ---------I 70th8Factor: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.7.5 7..20 1.15 1.18 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.7.5 HCM2k70th Q: 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.2 0.0 30.2 10.7 28.2 0.0 0.0 34.6 34.6 ------------ _____...--------- II-.... ------------- II--------------- II------- ...._.--- 85th4Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.43 1.60 1.43 1.52 7..43 1.60 1.60 1.41 IICM2k85thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 0.0 37.4 13.8 35.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 42.6 ------------ --------------- II..._ --___________II--------------- II------ ....._..._-- 90th°cFactor: 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.57. 1.80 1.51 1.65 7..52 1.80 1.80 1.49 1.49 11CM2k90thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 39.6 15.0 3'7.1 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 --- _-------- --------------- II_. ---___________II--------------- !I ----- --------- 95th'-aFactor: 2.7.0 2.10 2.10 1.64 2.10 1.64 1.86 7..65 2.10 2.10 1.61 1.61 IICM2k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 43.0 16.9 40.4 0.0 0.0 48.7 48.7 ------------ --------------- II--------------- ------------ ._-ii--___-_____-___I 98th','Facto,c: 2.70 2.70 2.70 1.83 2.70 1.83 2.20 1.85 2.70 2.70 1.80 1.80 HCM21:98thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.7, 0.0 48.1 19.9 45.3 0.0 0-0 54.3 54.3 1'raf,fix 8.0.0'715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA COHSOL'F1NG, IRVINE s^t+A:nbl Cumul+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 12-3 Fuel. Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 115 Lincoln SL Z Riverside Dr x+ „axa rn++r,xxxx.<+rs,x .r ,+e.a ,ee�a+a a .++a+++,xx,x,+�xxrrr+�+nxr xt uex+s+s+rxx Approach: North Bound South Hound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R -----------------..---------H---------------II--------------- II I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfstops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.0 71.0 42.8 181 0.0 0.0 180 7.5.1 Name: year 1995 composite flcat Fuel Corsumptl.on: 113.931 pounds 18.952 callous Carbon Dioxide: 355.965 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 29.168 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.681 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.2d2 pounds ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name year 2000 composite fleet. Fuel Consumption: 113.931. pounds 18.9.57 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 355.965 pounds Carbon Monnxide: 29.168 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.681 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 7..297 pounds DISCLAPMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling_ Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE 2zssLiie b+Cumul+Project AM 'Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 13-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) intersection 116 W Lakeshore Or & Riverside Dr ............ #-F t -kis AJ#%fA+-k-kik#*i Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol./Cap.(X): 0.620 Loss Time (sec): R Average Delay (sec/vch): 26.7 Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of ,Service: C %fA*+#+{♦-**1tY t}**>*ttt**+#*i t11 n)f,-k#%1A-111*k*�A�titk*+AAaY��}ft AA1*****Y+#}�T* Street Name: W Lakeshore Dr Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West [sound Movement: L - '1' - R L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II -------- ._------ II------- .___---II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 7. 0 2 0 1 .. 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II_ _...._--------- li-.______-----I Volume Module: Base Vol: 190 194 8 237106 146 699 326 48 573 140 05� Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. Bee: 190 194 8 237 252 106 146 699 326 48 573 140 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P14F Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 190 194 8 237 252 1.06 146 699 326 98 573 190 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 190 194 8 237 252 ]06 146 699 326 48 573 140 PCG Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fi nalVolume: 190 194 8 237 252 106 146 699 d26 98 573 190 ------------ ------------- ..._II ----------- _..--- II---------------- II -____-__--.__-__I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 7..00 1.92 0.08 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 7_.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Final Sat.: 1805 3446 142 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 1.900 161.5 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ._---- I I._______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.1.1 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.19 0.20 0.03 0.30 0.09 Crit Moves: 3*+d kI#t I I I I T}., Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.1.3 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.58 0.54 0.62 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.62 0.18 Uniform Del: 37.4 43.8 43.8 35.7 41..6 41.4 41.1 1.2.8 12.9 44.2 1.8.9 14.4 Incremnt Del.: 2.6 3.6 3.6 3.1 1.9 3.1 5.0 0.1 0.3 1.8 1.3 0.1 InitQuouDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 39.9 47.4 47.4 38.8 43.5 44.5 46.1 i2.9 13.2 46.0 20.2 14.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 39.9 47.4 47.4 38.8 43.5 44.5 46.1 12.9 13.2 46.0 20.2 1.4.5 LOS by Move: D D D D D D D B B D C B HCM2kAvg4: 6 4 4 7 5 4 _ 6 6 2 13 2 111.IIII#IIiIIIIII+i;l- I I I + I I A „1,1,I'h_#>rY1+'#'IkZIkf Ik 1 i s 11,,..,, Y\41.111 i.,# Y 111 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per ]ane. Traffiz: 8.O.O7r5 (c) 2008 Dowing Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE' Fast a-Amb+Cumul+Project AM 'Pue Mar 31, 2015 10:9:':58 mage 19-1 Leve]. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative xn,�waxa+xxr�x,a�+x*+.ar arxx s�r,ean,.n,x++sa i+v.>�+t.a+�.e a.aaiaxt+asr� „a+re,,,m+ Intersection if6 W Lakeshore Dr 8 Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound west Bound Movement: L - 'I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'I - R ------------ 1 --------------- 11 --------------- II --------------- II --__--__--_-_--I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R LnsInGros: 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- 11 --------------- I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: L 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 B 8 8 k Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 011" Oa Os 05 Parking/lir: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < � < < < < Other > ,> . .> > > >> - Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include v RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------- .__...------------ 11 --------------- 11---------------- 11___________-__-I HCM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: I(1t) Case: 1 xxxx t:xxx i, xxxx xxxx 1 xxxzx xxxx 1 ._ .. ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11------------- ..._11 ------ ...__.___......._i HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Win Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Parking Adj : txxx 1 .00 1.00 ,.xxx 1.00 xxxx 7.Uxx .1.00 %:Aux x>n:x 1.00 Bus Stp Adj : ;..._.x 1 _ 00 1 .001.00 ....,., _xxxx 1.00 .. ...,x .,uxx 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AT Adj: axxa 0.99 0.99 x.zx xxxx O.85 xxxx xx,;x 0.85 xxxx: xxxx 0.85 LT Adj' 0.95x7: x.; , .:n,:ax:.: 0.95 xxax ,xxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxx; 0.95 .._,x,;- . , PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 Us: Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MIL Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 0.94 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- II_______________I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < � < < < < � < < < < c No , , > > , Signal Type � � < < < < < Actuated - . > > > > - > - - Del Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 }%i iY irtkkA'LXiit#14*4ii 1#Y]*i+kiY1\+#*+aY+f'14*k*ii*tx**k#)iLL**�'i *Y�ia A -**iii ki-4-k Trafiix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Etst+Anlb+Cumu]. I Pro) ect AM Tue Mar 31., 2015 10:42:58 Page 14-2 Level Of. Service Dotailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 46 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T- R L T R L T R L- T- R ------------ I --------------- II___________ -__-II --------------- 11--------------- Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.49 0.49 Arri.valType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 4.8 2.8 2.8 6.0 3.5 2.8 3.8 5.8 5.2 1.3 .1.1.7 2.2 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.6 0.2 HCM21<Queue: 6.1 4.2 4.2 7.5 4.7 3.9 5.3 6.3 5.7 1.8 13.3 2.4 ------------ --------------- II__.... ------------ II.--------------- 11_-_____________I 70th$Fact0r: 1.19 1.7.9 1.19 1 I 1..19 1.19 1.7.9 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.17 1.19 HCM2k70thQ: 7.2 5.0 5.0 8.8 5.6 4.6 6.3 7.5 6.8 2.2 15.5 2.9 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II..._-- - --'--II--- -----I 85th;Factor: 1.54 1.56 1.56 1.53 1.56 1.56 1.55 1.54 1.55 1.58 1.49 1.58 HCM2k85th0: 9.4 6.6 6.6 11.5 7.4 6.0 8.2 9.7 8.9 2.9 19.8 3.8 ------------ --------------- 1i. --------------- 11 ------------ _..__ 11 --------------- I 90th°Factor: 1.69 1.72 1.7' 1.68 1.72 1.73 1.71 1.69 1.70 ]..77 1.61 1.75 HCM2k90thQ: 10.3 '7.3 7.3 12.5 8.1 6.7 9.0 10.7 9.8 3.2 21..3 4.2 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- .11---------------- 11----- ____----__I 95th$Factor: 1.93 1.97 1.97 7..90 1.96 1.98 ,1.95 1.92 1.94 2.04 1.79 2.03 HCM2k9SthQ: 11.8 8.4 6.4 14.2 9.3 7.7 7.0.3 12.1 11.1 3.7 23.7 4.9 ------------ 1---------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II_ ------____-___I 98th'.Factor: 2.33 2.42 2.42 2.26 2.40 2.44 2.31 2.32 2.34 2.57 2.06 2.53 HCM2k98thQ: 14.2 10.3 10.3 16.9 11.3 9.4 12.5 14.6 13.5 4.7 27.3 6.1. Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E:�sti-Amb+Cumul.+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 14-3 ------------------------------- Puel Consumntion and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative intersection it6 W Lakeshore Dr F Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Eas'C Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R 1., - T - R ._...... --------- I --------------- II --------------- II--- ......---------- II --------------- San -- ---Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPLa NumOfstops: 93.9 96.7 1.9 53.8 59.6 29.9 39.5 98.5 X6.9 11..9 105 19.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 90.008 pounds 14.581 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 280.826 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 22.024 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.987 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.020 pounds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 90.008 pounds 19.581 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 280.826 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 22.029 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.987 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.020 pounds ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applica Cions, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 9raffix 8.0.0715 (c) 12,008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE l:�sti-N11h+Cumul+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 15-1 Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 High School. Entrance & R.iverside Or *a 1AA1)*##41Y131*]**Yi t+.*}#'ktllli**t*#c FIYA**TwA 1t*t#*t'*li 4-Ah*+i liik**#**�AAIA Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol../Cap.(X): 0.537 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5 Optimal Cyr1 34 Level Of Service; B Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: - `P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R .____________--------------- .II --------------- II--------------- II_-- -----I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min_ Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YiR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ---------------- I --------- ----- _______________ ---------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 726 3 4 768 305 Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bs': 2 0 11 236 0 35 44 726 3 4 768 305 0 User Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHB' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 PHF Volume: - 0 11 236 0 35 44 726 3 4 768 305 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 11 236 0 35 44 726 3 4 768 305 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1..00 1_00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 2 0 1.1 236 0 35 44 726 3 4 768 305 ------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______ -_----_-I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900. Adjustment: 0.88 1..00 0.88 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 0.15 0.00 0.85 0.87 0.00 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1..43 0.57 Final Sat.: 257 0 1.41.3 1558 0 231 1805 3592 15 1805 2473 98,11, ___....__._----- I --------------- II---------------- II--------------- I (.------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: 1**l 1I_I-+ +*.. 1>11 Green/Cycle: 0.01. 0.00 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.58 0.58 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.54 0.54 Uniform Del: 48.9 0.0 48.9 30.4 0.0 30.4 46.7 9.2 9.2 49.4 12.9 12.9 IncremntDei: 21.8 0.0 21.8 1..2 0.0 1.2 6.9 0.1 0.1 15.1 0.3 0.3 I111l:Quou Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Delay/Veh: 70.8 0.0 10.8 31.5 0.0 31.5 53.6 9.3 9.3 64.5 13.2 13.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Ad,De1/Veh: 70.8 0.0 70.8 31.5 0.0 31.5 53.6 9.3 9.3 64.5 13.2 13.2 LOS by Move: E A E C A C D A A E B B HCM21:AvgQ: 1 0 1 7 0 7 2 6 6 0 11 1.7. Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 11 111,k'-.Fi.\iIi 1F**#i IY1***Ill'" ]**#i*it*4'"'"'.k+***,Lt'll",,A Ill,"x " "I Tratfi_: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, 1RV1NE Lxst-i-Amb+Cumul+Project AM 7'ue Mar 37., 2015 10:42:59 Page 16-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #7 High School Entrance & Diversion Dr ..a.+a+�a�+,a,e�e.�..ar.e+.xe-u�++-,.mow ir,�Fn rz ne txryF.w+..a.>.xsfi�e+ixs.e-a,axeax Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - 'C - R ------------ I ----- --------- 11 -------------- ....11--------------- 11---------------1 IICM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 7. 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR ,LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT 4tLnslnGrps: 7. 1 1 1 1 7. T I 2 1 2 2 --------------- 11 --------------- 11--- ......__________11 IICM Ops Tnput Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 7.2 12 12 Crsswal kWid: 8 8 B 8 =s Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 08 01, 0E, oa Parting/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < , < - < Other � , > > - -> > > . , , Craft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Exclusi.veRT: Include Tnclude Include Include R RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 -------------------11--- II II IICM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 4 xxxx 4 4 r:xxe 4 1 a...-.- ..xxx 1 xxxx :xxxx ------------ I--______________11 --------------- 11--------------- II--- HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L 00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 xa:xx 1.00 1.00 x::a;: 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :�xxs 1.00 1.00 7..00 1-00 xa�x .,...._ axsx Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 z_-._.. 1.00 .. Xxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 x,,:, 1.00 1.00 :r::>:: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 ::xxx 0.99 0.98 xxaIX 0.98 xxxx 1..00 1-00 xxxx 0.96 0-96 LT Adj: 0.990.99 0.96 0.96 0.95 - -"-"x 0.95 x '- •X." 0.99x 0-99 :,. ,. - tixxa ,, PedBlke Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.98 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96 0-96 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1-00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fel Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.88 0-94 1.00 0-94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.97. 0-91 ------------ -------- II--------------- I1......------------- 11 --------------- I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < It, < , . _ No . > . > , , > . , Signal Type: < < I� < � < 1- < < < - Actuated _> > > > > > > > . DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1-00 7..00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1-00 1.00 Traffix 8.0.077.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINF test Amh+Cumuli-Project AM The Mar 37., 2015 10:92:58 Paoe 16-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue M uliod) '_000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative A1iaa***SY}ai**a**taA..... ..kali........ . k -.l--.... ato Intersection lk7 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound .Soul -h Bnnnd Bast Bound [west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- I --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- 11_____________.__I Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.58 0.58 Arrival.Type: 3 3 3 3 Prog"'actor: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1.: 0.9 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.0 6.9 1.2 5.1 5.1 0.1 9.6 9.6 Upst to amVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Op.streamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 1.1, 1_0 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.1 HCM2KQueue: 1.1 0.0 1.1 7.5 0.0 Z 5 2.2 5.6 5.6 0.5 10.1 10.7 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______.________.I '70th§;Facto:: 1.20 1..20 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.18 lh'M2k70thQ: 1.3 0.0 1.3 8.9 0.0 8.9 2.6 6.7 6.7 0.6 12.6 12.6 _--------------- II--------------- 11------------- ..._11_____..._________I 851-h1..Lactor: 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.53 1.60 1.53 1.58 1..55 1.55 L 60 1.51 1.51 HCM2k85thQ: 1.8 0.0 1.8 11.5 0.0 11.5 3.9 8.7 8.7 0.8 16.2 16.2 ------ ...----- --------------- II--------------- II------------ .___II______________....I 9oth'. actor: 1.78 1.80 1.78 1.68 1.80 1.68 1.76 1.70 1.70 1.79 1.63 1.63 11CM2k90thQ: 2.0 0.0 2.0 12.5 0.0 12.5 3.8 9.5 9.5 0.8 17.5 17.5 ------------ --------------- --------------- ------------ -- -------------- 95th"tactor: 2.06 2.10 2.06 1.90 2.10 1.90 2.03 1.99 1.99 2.08 1.83 1.83 HCM2k95thQ: 2.3 0.0 2.3 19.2 0.0 19.2 9.9 10.9 10.9 1.0 19.7 19.7 ____________I_______11_______________11________...______II__________._____I 98th`;Factor: 2.62 2.70 2.62 2.26 2.70 2.26 2.55 2.35 2.35 2.66 2.19 2.19 HCM2k98thQ: 2_9 0.0 2.9 16.9 0.0 1.6.9 5.5 13.2 13.2 1.3 73.0 23.0 Traffic 8.0.07i5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc_ Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E;a t+7llnb+Cmnul+Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:92:58 Page 16-3 ------------------------------ Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative %k iA'.{T'L}Y;�xLLYi k1}y,,a,1A**-AA,A�1Fz?}ua-<<;#k#iY��)k-k*+AAAIAF*T--A--1 AA1r-A#-S*)1A)-A'Aa Intersection $7 High School Entrance s Rfversi.de Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 'P - R L - 1' - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ -------- ....------ II--------------- II---------- .....---- II_...__.___________I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH Numofstops: 0.5 0.0 2.7 49.9 0.0 1.4 10.8 87.2 0.9 1.0 117 46.7 Name: year 1995.composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 48.367 pounds 7.835 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 150.906 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 1.1.232 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.853 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.562 pounds --------------------------- ---- ..______ _Name: year 2000 composite ,fleet fuel Consumption: 48.367 pounds 7.835 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 150.906 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 1.1..232 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.853 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.562 pounds ---------------------._.____----------------_----------____-______________-_______ DISCLAIMER The fuel. consumption and emissions measures should be used with cautt.on and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFF.I,X. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffiz 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 DnaLing Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, 1RV1he East+Amb+Cumuli-Project AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:42:58 Page 17-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Stadium Way C Riverside Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(x): 0.455 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.1 Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Scrvicc: D Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside or Approach: North Bound South Hound Lost Round West Round Movement: L - T - R L - '1 - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yh R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1. 1 0 1 0 7. 1 0 ------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II----------------- II --------------...I Volume Module: Base Vol: 7 1 12 103 1 153 180 637 1 - 695 82 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 7 1 12 103 1 153 180 637 1 5 695 82 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 1 12 7.03 1 153 180 637 :L 5 695 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 1 IS 103 1 153 180 637 1 5 695 82 PCL Adj: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 7 1 12 103 1 153 1.80 637 1 5 695 82 ---------------------------II----------_----II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 0.87 0.13 1.00 1..00 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.19 0.27, Final Sat.: 1413 202 1615 1805 10 1606 1805 3604 6 1.805 3177 375 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- .------ II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: All, I'll I'll ,*** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.19 0.21 0.27. 0.22 0.69 0.69 0.01 0.48 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.46 0.46 Uniform Del: 49.2 47.7 47.9 34.4 34.6 34.6 33.9 5.9 5.9 49.1 17.3 17.3 Incremnt Del: 7.3 0.9 2.4 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 56.5 46.7 50.2 34.B 35.5 35.5 34.7 5.9 5.9 55.9 17.5 17.5 User DelAdj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel./Veh: 56.5 48.7 50.2 34.8 35.5 35.5 34.7 5.9 5.9 55.9 17.5 17.5 LOS by Move: E D D C D I) C A A E B R HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 3 _ 5 5 4 4 0 8 8 i -*i *aha -.n*♦ li 4fit*x-n 4111+*t2t'.ii Al-ki*All*##}x-+1A iki l#Y 1i *A4nI 11>k*k*t}k:t** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane_ hi-YA1f]i##yzi r#�i+};yy{-h-e *ix Al-]iX k -hi ,13#*YA)ik#i#-F-k lA .alt i/ii(}k1 rhAAAA sA-k Traffl,; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA COHSULT.TNG, IRVINE st-i-Amb+CumuL;Pr:oject AM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.0:42:58 Page 18-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 111A1a 41-A'1ir1k}Y}IllAi�+#**AAl1Yt**+AY LI..............+t 11 Yi*A-A 1......... t i. Ak Int e,rsection 118 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr f*1A-1<v�k**L1%1Y<]z*11*4}-k#ayy}--A*�***iA 4i*h*#Ai*+-e{tt1Ai AAkki%AA-k-k +'k't��.i)AA Approach: North Bound South Bound Gast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - I - R I. - T - R L - I - R ------------ I._-------------- II--------------- II-_ __II_-_-_ HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L R'I' RT L RT RT #LnsTnGrps: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 ._----------- I ---- ._---------- 11 --------------- II_.--------------II-_._.____--______I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 1,'. 12 12 1.,1 12 1.2 12 12 Crsswa l kWid: 8 8 8 8 Lev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: O;S 0'1 0Y, OL Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus .Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > 0 > > > - - - Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveR4': Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- 11____-_--__-.__-_11___-_-_ II __._._1 HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 4 4 4 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx 1 xxxx __.---------- __1 --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II -_______---__._...I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: to Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Ven Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ,,x:;x 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ..xxx 1.00 1.00 CSCC 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1..00 ._xxx 0.98 0.98 LT Ad': 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 x>:xa: -a--- PedB].ke Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.98 Lsr Sat Adj: 1_00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 FnI Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 ------------ ---------------- 11. --------------- 11--------------- --------------- Delay -_ _II___ --- Delay Adjustment factor Module: Coordinated: < < , < < < , < < � < < No > . - > . > > > , Signal Type < < � < < < < < < < < Actuated = > > > - > > > - > > DelAdjFctr: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 I I A I I I + I I I I I „ 1lII II I Ii I'll fi+tt]{*-kY1-11,111114.1, 1k�IIIAIII IIII,II#I+IIIIIII Traffic. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 DoUli.ng ASSOC. Licensed to VA CONSUL'T'ING, IRVINE East+AmblCmnuldProject AM Tue Mar 31, 2.015 10:42:58 Page 18 Level Or Servi.ce Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 I1CM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ...........«r+.. ..+,........ Intersection #8 Stadium Way 6 Riverside Or Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West Bound muVement: L - '1' - R L - T - R L - T - R ., - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- 11_______-______-1 Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.69 0.69 0.01 0.48 0.48 Arr.ivalType: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ql: 0.2 0.2 0.3 2.4 3.7 3.7 4.3 3.5 3.5 0.1 7.6 7.6 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.8 HCM2KQueue: 0.8 0.5 0.7 2.9 4.5 4.5 5.1 3.9 3.9 0.4 8.4 8.4 ---------- I--------------- II------ ...-------- II--------------- II__._______ -_____I 70th°Factor: 1.20 1.2.0 1.20 I.19 1.7.9 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.18 HCM2k70th4: 1.0 0.6 0.9 3.4 5.4 5.4 6.1 4.6 4.6 0.5 9.9 9.9 ---------- __________.._____II ------- --------- II__... ------------ 11_______________I 85th='Factor: 1.59 7..60 :1..59 1.57 1.56 1.56 1.55 1.56 1.56 1.60 1.53 1.53 HCM2k85thQ: 1_3 0.7 1.1 4.5 '7.1 7.1 8.0 6.0 6.0 0.7 1.2.8 12.8 ------------ 1--------- ...----- II--------------- II--------------- II_.______________I 90th'Factor: 1.18 7..79 1.79 1.75 1..72 1.72 1.71 1.73 7..73 1.79 1.66 1.66 HCM2k90thQ: 1.4 0.8 1.3 5.0 1.8 7-8 8.8 6.7 6.7 0.8 13.9 13.9 ---------- ..._--------------- .11----- ._--------- II--------------- 11-______-_______1 95thoFactor: 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.01 1.97 1.97 1.95 1.98 1.98 2.09 1.88 1.88 HCM2k95thQ: 1.7 1..0 1..5 5.7 8.9 8.9 10.0 7.7 7.7 0.9 15.7 15.7 ------- ....----- ---------------- 11_____ --------------- 11____-__________I 98th8Factor: 2.64 2.67 2.65 2.50 2.40 2.40 2.37 2.44 2.44 2.67 2.23 2.23 HCM2kHthQ: 2.1 1.2 1.9 7.1 10.9 10.9 12.2 9.4 9.4 7..2 18.6 18.6 Traff].x 8.0.0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East i-Amb+Cumul+ProjecC AM Tile Mar 31, :'01 11 10:92:58 Pagc 18-3 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 ECM Operations Method Baso Volume Alternative Intersection 148 Stadium Way k Riverside Dr wx,r ea,.xx+,..,.++swxx ert�+w++��.a�+wxa,a aiewexx+.cart+xxxt.+.x-k xa �+a.n+ena.a.+xa Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R ----------- ._I --------------- II_--___II_----____.___---II--......._----______I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumGfstops: 1..Y 0.2 2.9 22-0 0.2 33.9 39.0 60.2 0.1 1.2 115 13.6 Name: year 1.995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 96.005 pounds 7.953 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 193.539 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 10.852 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.897 pounds Nitroqen Oxides: 0.52`7 pounds -__._...._----------------------------------------------------- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 96.005 pounds 7.953 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 193.539 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 10.852 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.897 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.527 pounds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric desi.gn alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent controlmeasures and other system elements. tiaffi:x 8.0.0715 M 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOI,TING, IRVINE Eat+Amb+Cumuil+Project PM 'fue Mar 31, 2015 17.:36:59 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenar]_o: last+Amb+Cumuil+Project PM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Gee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution Paths: Routes: Configuration: Default Conunand Default Volume Default Geometry Default Tmpact F'PP Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration Traff lz: £3.0.0715 (c) 200£3 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Ess ti Amb+Cumui I i Pro! ect PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11136:59 Page 2-1 Impact Analysis Report Levo]. Of Service 7: ntersecti.on Base Del/ V/ LOS Veh C If 1 Grand Ave & Machado St R 10.9 0.993 if 2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave B 11.4 0.063 if 3 SR 78/Rive.rside Dr & Grand 'Ave B 19.5 0.526 $ 4 Grand Ave & Macy St A 7.5 0.865 If 5 Lincoln St & Ri.ve.rsi.de Dx C 24.7 0.881 9 6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr C 30.8 0.786 If 7 High ,School Entrance & Riversi A 4.5 0.325 Future Change PC.] Dl/ V/ in LOS Ven C B 10.8 0.493 + 0.000 V/C B 11.4 0.063 + 0.000 D/V B 19.5 0.526 -i 0.000 D/V A 7.5 0.865 + 0.000 D/V C 29.7 0.881 + 0.000 D/V C 30.8 0.786 + 0.000 D/V A 9.5 0.375 + 0.000 D/V if 8 Stadium Way & Riverside Dr A 5.3 0.359 A 5.3 0.359 + 0.000 D/V Traffi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, TRVINE E:�s N-Amb+Cumui_1-iProject PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Paqe 3-0 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (base Volume Alternative) i.Y A111-kii+lY.lA1..iJA.i#*>k*�kA....#*#ttifiX}*AA1lAi#{.i*kk*Y%Y#*FA-1n**x]#aaYAAi Intersection If] Grand Ave & Machado St Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol./Cap-(X): 0.493 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.4 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Serviue: B ++r,.xs....,,..+..........a......x+....>.+...........,..x.........+.++..�,+.+ Street Name: Grand Ave Machado St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'I - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------- .....---II ---------------- Control: -------Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- _____________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 258 150 19 204 0 0 2 1 91 I. 27 GroWLh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. Bse: 1 258 150 19 204 0 0 2 1 91. 1 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 1 258 150 19 204 0 0 2 1 91 1 27 Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 258 150 19 204 0 0 2 1 91 1 27 PCE Ad: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 HLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Einalvolume: 1 258 1.50 19 204 0 0 2 1 91 1 27 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- H - Saturation Plow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :_ 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.63 0.36 0.09 0.91, 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 0.76 0.01 0.23 Final Sat. :I 1 523 304 64 686 0 0 403 202 481 5 1.13 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ----------------i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.49 0.99 0.49 0.30 0.30 Vaxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: ,."" X111 ..x* +..� Delay/Veh: 11.2 11.2 11.2 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel./Veh: 11.2 1.1.2 11.2 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 LOS by Move: B B B A A * " A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.2 9.5 8.2 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.2 9.5 8.2 9.3 LOS by Appr: B A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 ...,x,+.......i........x...x......m.+............... x...t a v. ...aa+..y.xe�i...z Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffiz 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA COHSUL'T1NG, SRVINP EcsL Amb] CumuIIIProject PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36-:59 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCH 4 -Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative I:ntersecti.on III Grand Ave I, Machado St y}kar#LA'1YX'Y1A#*{i�*,YY11a 4-A-kl'I lik**+ki+#*x*Y t�1 l**�**fiti ti}tiz#kik*xkl-i tit -h+ -A Approach: North Hound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - _ - R L - T - R l„ - 'C - R Time Period: ---------------- 0.25 hour ----------------- ---------------- I________________I HevVeh: 0'a 0111, Oo 0`c Alpha Value: 0.01 ----------- Group'Pype: ------------- ...---- 1 ---------------- I - 1 - -- I 1 --------------I 1 P[Cl]: 0.59 0.43 0.30 0.37 PIC']: 0.24 0.40 0.06 0.00 P[C3]: 0.13 0.09 0.41 0.49 PIN]: 0.05 0.09 0.20 0.14 P[C5]: 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 Padj[Cl]: 0.006 0.008 0.016 0.014 Padj[C2]: -0.000 -0.001. 0.008 0.008 Padj[C3]: -0.003 -0.002 -0.010 -0.013 Padj[C4]: -0.003 -0.005 -0.012 -0.008 Padj[C5]: -0.000 ---------------- I -0.000 ----------------- I ---------------- -0.002 I -0.000 ----------------I ----------- I Lane: Ll L1 Ll Ll LarneType: LEFTTHRURITE ;--------- LEFTTHRURITE .._------ ---------------- LEFTTHRURITE LEFTTHRURITF., ---------------- ----------- I HeadwayAdj: ---------------- -0.220 0.07.7 -0.200 0.017 Volume: 409 223 3 119 Capacity: 829 750 605 629 DegufUtil: 0.48 0.29 0.00 0.17 DepHeadway: 4.25 4.65 5.22 5.24 ServiceTime: 2.3 2.7 3.2 3.2 Delay: 11.2 9.5 8.2 9.3 Queue: 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.2 ----_.----..------I ----------- Approach: ---------------- I---------------- North Bound I---------------- South Bound I East Bound West Bound ----------- ApproachDel: --- 11.2 ----- .....-_.------- --- 9.5 8.2 ------------- 9.3 Delay Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 :1.00 ApprAdj Del: 11.2 9.5 8.2 9.3 LOS by Appr: B A A A OverallDel: 10.4 Overall. LOS: B Tra£fi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE East+Amb+Cumui I' Project PM TUC Mar 31, 2015. 1.1.:36:59 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Onsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *+ii***a*]*l�#tx�'f*%'mill*+zlrtti l'1 *rt>tA1Ylf#af�r11A1*a# 11Ai }x A�Afkaa#*-FA*A#;1 Intersection If2 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave f11A Ali+3**fi'Y!#S*1xAA1A1#-*}w1I1AA**fix4tkrt*R*1.Aff*3+i#xxYfYkf�\A111*AAAA-A4*Rf Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.4] xxx++e aaxixa,as ai«xaaixiaiiaaii+xm++ii u�.�,iaeia. r»..a a.e,u „ =+ia. lax«r++iraaa+i Street Name: Grand Ave Pive:rsi.dc Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________----------- ...--- II--------------- II---------- -----II--------------- Central: ---------Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II----------- ...---- II--------------- II------------ ...--I Volume Module: Rase Vol: 38 442 0 0 292 28 30 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 Initial Bse: 38 442 0 0 292 28 30 0 34 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Volume: 3B 442 0 0 292 28 30 0 39 0 0 0 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pi.nalVolume: 38 442 0 0 292 28 30 0 34 0 0 0 ------------ ---------------- II --------------- II------ ......__.-----II-------_------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 scans, xxxx xxxxx E011owUpTim: 2-2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx seas x,..,....: 3.5 4.0 3.3 ...,..x xxxxx �.:.. �.� ,�-�..-r vim,., ------------ .--------------- II--------------- li-_------------- II ----------I Capacity Module: Cut 7.i_ct Vol.: 320 xxxx xxxxx xx,• exux -x-,:r 529 824 1.60 .,... Xxxx. Potent Cap.: 1251 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 484 310 863 s,:x. rose. xxxxx Move Cap.: 1251 xxxx xxxxx .a-:xx x-,,., ..xx.;x 473 301. 863 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxxvt tC xxxx xxxx 0.06 0.00 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I ---------------- II____ --_...---____II --------------- II--------- ...----I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx ':Ixx xx%:-x xxxx xxxx xxxxx. Cont,ro.l. Del: 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx: xxxx ......x :cxxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * i I a x w . i x Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTD - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx ... C.,., 622 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ..xxx .,_...xx ,c..n_� _r�.-�_. SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx: x..,,.... 0.3 xxxxx nn-xxx xxxx xxxxx Surd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx, xx xxxx.:: . xxxxx 11.4 Z,Xi:x.s xxxxx xxxx x.xxx:x naX. x..x-. xxxxx �. n., Shared LOS: ' x i x x , I B , . x ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxx 11.4 ...,;xxxx ApproachLOS: * ^ B ixee.ax+.zai xaiaxaaaxaeaxaa<wi axixx+a av,.,.xaiaie,r.a+a.� ���..w+-c.,ixa+.ams+ixii Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per Jane. aaexxx+xixtaxa.axiaai rias+ -a xa+a uawiii.aaa ala say, ,.sax-xayiaaa x -a ixa xx,xazxii as+x Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Lest +Amb+Cumuil-rProject PM Tee Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 6 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignali.zed Method Base Volume Alternative 'Praffi- 8.0.0']15 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed Lo VA CONSULTING, IRVINE. IntersecLior, 142 Grand Ave & Riverside Ave }#aiAF I}II, ilii/+>-ixl I „ Fax l d. a. a a I I I I a a i I II +#�{4Akrzr#1l,l eihdi k—i ii i. *.A_.,,xA# Apuroach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L, - 'P - R L - T - R I________________I L _ 'P _ R _I-------------- HevVeh: ..._I 01; ---------------- Or .---------------- 08. 05 Grade: 03 OR 05 03 Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 PedesLii.an Walk Speed: 9.00 feet/sec LaneWi. dth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet. 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour 'Praffi- 8.0.0']15 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed Lo VA CONSULTING, IRVINE. Exst+Amb+Cumuil+Project I'M Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.].:36:59 Page 7-1 Level. Of Service Computation Report 3000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 93 SR 79/Riverside Dr & Grand Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(x): 0.526 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh) 19 5 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B .............+., ..........++ .x.+..r..x Street Name: SR 74/Riverside Or Grand Ave Approach: North Round South Bound East Bound WessC Bound Movement: .. - 'I - ,. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- Il --------------- 11 ______-------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 _ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I --------------- II--------------- II---------------- II______________ -.I Volume Module: Base Vol: 339 987 0 0 615 127 105 0 220 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 339 987 0 0 615 1.27 105 0 220 0 0 0 User. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 339 987 0 0 615 127 105 0 220 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 339 987 0 0 61.5 127 105 0 220 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 339 987 0 0 615 127 105 0 220 0 0 0 ------------ ---------- ...---- II...._. ------------- II...______________II--._______--____ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1..00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3610 161.5 3502 0 167.5 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II---------------- II._-------------- II -_.______--_____I Capacity Analysis Module: Vo1/Sat: 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.1.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: "*** .-** t,,-, Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.3,_ 0.32 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.17 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uni.£orm Del: 25.4 7.0 0.0 0.0 27.5 24.8 28.3 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.B 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 :L.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 26.3 7.1 0.0 0.0 28.0 25.0 28.4 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DclAdj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Vch: 26.3 7.1 0.0 0.0 28.0 25.0 28.4 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C A A A C C C A C A A A I1CM2kAvgQ: 9 7 0 0 8 3 1 0 6 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of gals pe,r lane. Ii LII a11+}y IAl l,.I I II IIA.I,q*.....1.-x..1+A.,'.... I a i. t##. 1 Y i. I x h. l 1. I I I I I lI*A 14 Traffia 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc_ Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb-rCumuil+Pro ject PM Tue Max' 31, 2015 11.:36:59 Page 8-1 Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CON.SULTTNG, IRVINE Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ++..+............... ...aa,.+++f.....++++.,..... +......,.+.r. .. �..,+.+,,..� intersection #3 SR 7VR4versl.de Or & Grand Ave ......+.,_...+...,.i -w.-............,.. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - --------------- R L - 11--------------- T - R 11_ L - T - R __- ------------ I HCM Ops Adjusted --------------- Dane Utilization 11 Module: Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group: L T ..x.,x Is cX:x T R LR �� _.x :x ::. _.x x X.; NI,nsInGrps: 1 .. 0 11 0 2 --------------- 1 ._ 11--------------- 0 1 II----- 0 0 0 ------------ I HCM Ops Input --------------- Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 1.2 1.2 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 R Hev Ven: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0111, 08 0`.; 0';: Parking/Hr: No No No He Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < c < < << < < < < < < < < < < Other - _ Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 E,:clusiveRT: include Include Include Include `S R'I Prtct: 0 11 0 --------------- j1-------- 0 ...------ 11___---_ 0 ------------ HCM Ops f(It) --- Adj Case Module: f(It) Case: 1 xxxX _.�. xxxx xxxx ease xxxs � _ xxxi: -I i.xzx ...- ::;;;y:x =::: -I HCM Ops Saturation Adj -11 Module: Ln Wi.d Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1..00 x c c1.00 xcxc' Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxs. 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 .__=x xFBx xxxxX Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxr.x 1..00 x::x>: xxxc >'>:'"ex Parking Adj: soca 1.00 as X-1, XxY.x xxxx 1.00 - ,'.,:Xc 1.00 ncxi;: xcxx xxxx:: Bus Stp Adj: 'x 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 -cox '""=x=: xxx,x x. Area Ad!: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1..00 1.00 1.00 x...... 1.00 ......,. ..i -x xxexx � . RT Adj: coax x;:xx xxxxx xxxx xxxs 0. BS xxxx .-.... ^ z,'; � ::xxz ".XX xx:::u: LT Adj: LT A Q xx7:X 0._5 xxxxx xxxx xxl(x comes 5 D.9J X'Lxx ;...Xx h.. ....., e_.._�d :4xx}: __........ " c" "`. ;.,": 'ke Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1..00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 1..00 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Put Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 --------------- 0.92 1.00 11__ 0.85 __-1i_--___-------__I 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------- I Delay Adjustment --------------- Factor 11 Module: Coordi. nated: . < < < < I< < < < < < < c < 1: No - - > - - - Signal Type: ' ' ' ' < < < < < < < < Actuatc-d - - > > > > > DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.0n 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CON.SULTTNG, IRVINE F.xst+Amb-i-Cumuil+Project PM Tue Mar. 31, 2015 11:36:59 Pane Level Of Se.LViCO Detailed Computation Report, (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative .+..........+.,...a.-. Intersection #3 SR 74/Riverside Ur & Grand Ave «+...1««....111.....+..s.x..,a.m..=.a...x.aa.............x.ex.a...a.. Approach: North Bound South Rnnnd East: Bound West Lound Movement: L - 'I - R L -- 'I - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ I ---------------- II_ _________II_______________ II_______________I Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 PrcgFactor: 1.00 1.00 i_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ql: 7-5 6.3 0.0 0.0 7.3 2.6 1.1. 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OnstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q2: 1.1. 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1. 0.3 0.1, 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM2KQueue: 8.5 7.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 2.9 1.3 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ ----------------- II__...------------ 70th F;Fact or: 1.18 1.i8 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.20 1..20 11CM2k70thQ: 10.1 8.3 0.0 0.0 9.9 3.5 1.5 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 85th,Factor.: 1.53 1.541 1_60 1.60 1.53 1.57 1.59 1.60 1.58 1.60 1..60 1.60 HCM2 k85thQ: 13.0 10.8 0.0 0-0 12.8 4.6 2.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ I---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 90th8Factor: 1.66 1.68 1.80 1.80 1.66 1.75 1.78 1.80 1.69 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2 1:90tliQ: 19.2 :41.8 0.0 0.0 14.0 5.1 2.3 0.0 1.0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ I------- ._----- .__II--------------- 95thoFactor: 1.87 1.91 2.1.0 2.1.0 1-88 2.01 2.06 2.10 1.92 2.10 2.10 2.10 HCM2k95thQ: 16.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 15.8 5.8 2.6 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------ ------ ..--------- II--------------- II--------------- 11_______________I 98th'Factor: 2.212.28 2.70 2.70 2.22 2.50 2.61 2.70 2.32 2.70 2.70 2.70 HCM2k:HLhQ: 18.9 16.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 7.3 3.3 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tratfiv £3.0.0'/15 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINI 9t+AMb+Cumuil+Pr03ect PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 17.:36:59 Page 8-3 Fuel. Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I IIII,I II k, I A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I k I II 1 I I a 1 Ifi I a I I I I I I r I I I I#IIII,# Intersection N3 SR 74/Riverside Dr t Grand Ave IIII .FIIIIIIIItI II+IIII „ IkIIIIEItkI*IIII III II I-ASI,-FIIIII1II a.IIIIII,If III=o ,IxII1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- I1... -------------- II--... ------------ 1I ---------------I Run Speed: 30 MPI4 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 67.7. 108 0.0 0.0 125 23.3 20.1 0.0 47.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 61 .1,51 pounds 9.907 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 190.801 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 14.528 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.507. pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.702 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 61.156 pounds 9.907 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 190.801 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 14.528 pounds Hydrocarbons: 2.501 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.702 pounds DISCLAIMER The Fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric Nosier, alternatives or for general planning applica Cions, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a singio ,intersection within 'Che CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assnc. T ceased to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE st+Ambi-Cumuil+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 9 Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *1 i}YY#;*41AatS 1:}X'A 11A A-k#*4i}1--1t*3*i-xit*i*f'Y*sAAY**st*♦A1.1 ........... Intersection 1(4 Grand 'Ave k Macy St Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.865 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.5 Optimal Cycle: 69 Level GL Servlue: A Street Name: Grand Ave Macy St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'I - R L - T - R L - 'I - R ----------- I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11_____._---______I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Riq_hts: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 1. 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1.! 0 0 --------------- II--------------- 11__... ------------ 11_____________..__I Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 1.309 9 2 728 52 19 0 27 1 0 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 34 1309 9 2 728 52 1.9 0 27 1 0 3 Over Adl: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHI, Adl: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RHC Volume: 34 1309 9 2 728 52 19 0 27 1 0 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 34 1309 9 2 728 52 19 0 27 1 0 3 PCF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLIP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 ['inalVolume: 34 1309 9 2 728 52 19 0 27 1, 0 3 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- 11------------ ....__11___________--__I Saturation Plow Module: Sat/1'ane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.97 0.97 0.97 1..00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.90 1.00 0.90 Lanes: 0.02 0.97 0.01 0.01, 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 0.00 0.75 Fina]. Sat : 46 1786 12 5 1895 1615 1900 0 1615 417 0 1281. ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----------- ...--- I; Capacity Analysis Module: Vol./Sat: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.01, 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: i1* -111s Green/Cycle: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 Volame/Cap: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.86 0.12 0.00 0.12 Uniform Del: 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.1 1.1 0.7 29.1 0.0 29.3 28.9 0.0 28.9 IncremntDel: S.3 5.3 5.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 12.3 0.0 1.05.6 1.6 0.0 1.6 IniLQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1..00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: "/.9 7.9 7.9 1.3 1.3 0.7 41.5 0.0 135.0 30.6 0.0 30.6 OserUelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.. G0 1.00 1..00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 1.3 1.3 0.7 4:L.5 0.0 135.0 30.6 0.0 30.6 LOS by Move: A A A A A A D A F C A C FICM2kAvgQ: 1.8 18 1.8 4 4 0 1 0 _ 0 0 0 0 ,..... Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. I Ii III I k III,I II1II11„ k II i l+l, t i+*#T++tiik?III „ i,% A 4# 11. l S f, l a i Ai ,t#AA,,.+}h T.raff ix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTLNG, IRVINE Exst+Amb+Cumuil+Project PM '1'ue Mar 31, 201.5 1.1:36:59 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative **ktil iT*4+A11{*a#lA\�kT AA 3-A411k#fi 11.**#Lk xi AAl Ff tlY..i t1#Ak-1 lith*#+':*AAAA AW* intersection 94 Grand Ave & Macy St *1'i AAAi}kf lfiYlA t-Fx-Fifi�AAS*-A %Ifl*i-*iakfi ti**i 1A1 }'tf!*YYA k-F}+*fYl I1kAAA #iLL*t Approach: North Bound .South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---- 11 ...- ------- l - HCM Ops Adjusted Lane utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1, 0 0 1 0 0 i! 0 U Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LT LT R LT LT R LTR LTR LIP i4LnsInGr:ps: 1. _ 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11---------------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 CruswalkWid: 8 8 8 8 'e Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0`, 0' Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: _ . , _ . . , , Other , . . , . > > > � . > Cuff Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Exclusive RT: Include Include .Include Include r RT Prtct 0 0 0 0 ------------ i.--------------- II-------------- _._II-- If HCM Ops f(1t) Adj Case Module: f(1t) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 xxxx xxxx 5 xxxx 5 ------------ 1 --------------- 11 -------------- ...II--------------- II HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln W,i.d Adj: 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 r._..... 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ._xHu xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,,,._.. 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx: 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1..00 x.._.. 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 RT Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,cxx 0.85 ,:xx_x 0.85 0.90 xxxx 0.90 LT Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 x........ 1.00 xxxaa, xxx 1.00 xsrx 1..00 PedBike Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1..00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.90 1.00 0.90 Gar Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Bel Sat Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.90 1.00 0.90 --- 1----- 11 --------------- 11 ---- 11 --_------------ Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: , I , I I . . i . , <, No . > > > > > , > > Signal Type: < < < I � . "Actuated . . > > > , , , . > De1.Adj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..SO I" 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 �1 �, , 00 0.00 1..00 Y.X+*+iAYt-kwifY'.�+i*-A Ati AilY-r.-A AA1tix2]�\IAF}++iAi/*-Alt+ilixa*i*}k#�1Fk*f-h lAikt'kt Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 20013 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE E;:st+Amb+Cumuil+Project PM Tue Mar_ 31, 2015 17.:36:59 Page 10-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adl) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #4 Grand Ave & Macy St Approach: North South East Wcot Cycle Length, C: 60 60 60 60 Actual. Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 50.84 50.84 1.16 1.16 Effective Green 'rime Per Lane Group, q: 50.84 50.84 1.16 1.16 Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 50.84 50.84 1.16 .1..16 Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: .l 1 1 1 Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 1 1. Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 34 2 19 1 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit: 0.03 0.00 1.00 0.25 Proportion of Left 'Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: .�.,:ixxX 0.03 0.25 xxxxax Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 0.57 0.03 0.32 0.02 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 730 1.3:52 4 19 Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Vol.c: 19.17 22.53 0.07 0.32 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lost Time Per Phase, it: 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Eff grn until, arrival, of left -turn car, gf: 23.86 43.07 0.00 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.15 0.15 0.98 0.98 Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 2.25 3.22 0.00 0.00 Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 26.98 7.77 1.16 1.16 Masa opposing_ cars arrivina du.ri.ng gq-gf, n: ....._.._... 0.00 0.00 xxaxxx Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: ......XX.`: 0.98 0.75 xxxrxx Left -turn Saturation Factor, fs: 0.42 1: X .,-,... 7`1 X x, x X 0.86 Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 0.03 0.00 1.00 0.15 Through -car Equivalents, ell: 2,89 5,21 1,41 1.43 Single Lane Through -car Equivalents, PIS: ..,_XX.., ',. 1.00 1.00 x::xxxx Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 0.04 0.04 3.45 2.16 Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fin: 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fit: 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 11*111A111111 1........4#.%#'k*i�s***+*1 Y.'**{lAi{;**........... Traffix 8.0.0'715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Er,st+Amb+Cmnuil+Project PM Tue Mar 37., 2015 11:36:59 Page 10-3 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (I1CM2000 queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ...+=..ex=.. ,....... „ .,ew+........... L tersection JH Grand Ave a Macy St .t..,., x+x��i.,,+ex.�.,.+>.....,..e...r,.i+......x...«xx.+...r<ana... .a.+ter...... .. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R L - [I,' - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I Green/Cycle: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.0'2 Arrival'1ype: 3 3 3 3 Prog('actor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 Ql: 12.9 1.2.9 12.9 3.0 3.0 O.i 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Opst reamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P.arlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Q2: 5.3 5.3 5.3 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 11CM2NQueue: 18.2 18.2 18.2 3.8 3.8 0.2 7..1 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 .._ .............______--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II____..._..____...._._...I 70th'SFactor: 1.16 1.16 1.16 1..1.9 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 :1..20 7..20 HCM2k70thQ: 21.2 21.2 21..2 4.6 4.6 0.2 1.3 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 ----- II------- ...------- II--------------- II_______________I 85th°,Factor: 1.46 1.46 1.46 1.56 1.56 1.60 1.59 1.60 1.58 1.60 1.60 1.60 H CMP Ic85th4: 26.6 26.6 26.6 6.0 6.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 3.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 ------------ ------ .....-------- II---------------- II--------------- II_______________I 90th': Factor: 1..56 1.56 1.56 1.73 1.73 7..80 1.?8 1.80 1.76 1.80 1.80 1.80 HCM2k90thQ: 28.4 28.4 28.4 6.6 6.6 0.3 2.0 0.0 3.6 0.4 0.0 0.4 ------------ -------- ....._..---- II--------------- II--------------- 11__-_-----------I 95th'o Factor: 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.98 1.98 2.09 2.06 2.10 2.04 2.09 2.10 2.09 HCM21:95th4: 31.3 31.3 31.3 7.6 7.6 0.4 2.3 0.0 4.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------- ......__._1 981 h&,acto r: 1.95 1.95 1.95 2.44 2.44 2.69 2.62 2.70 2.55 2.68 2.10 2.68 IICM2k98th4: 35.4 35.4 35.4 9.4 9.4 0.5 2.9 0.0 5.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 'Irafti:c 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Id.censed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Pest iAmb+Cumu:i.l,+Project PM Tun Mar 31, 2015 ].1.:36:59 Pape 10-4 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume A,l ternative Intersection 44 Grand Ave 6 Macy St 111*11111'111t1..... A1111.*>kl1Ar)-�-is1�4vAA i�k �k �1 YI'*i\k#tTI Y♦*##i#f...... Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen'C: L-- R L T R T R - T- R ______--____I___--__-L L _______II_________-._____II_______________II___--__________I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MEN NumOfStops: 4.9 1.87 1.3 0.1 45.1 2.1 4.7 0.0 6.7 0.2 0.0 0.7 ..... ----------------- _----- .________---_.________-_._..____________--_____________--____ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 36.956 pounds 5.906 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 113.744 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 7.866 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.116 pounds Nitrogen Oxides 0.430 pounds ________________________._.__________--__________._._.___________--_-____________-.___ Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 36.456 pounds 5.906 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 113.744 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 7.866 pounds Hydrocarbons: 1.116 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.430 pounds ----------------------------------------- _----------------- .____________---__________ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution, and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and 'IRAFFIX. Netwo.r.k models are more appropriate since they can account for the .influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffic 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVIIaE st-IAnil) +Cumui l r Project 11111 Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 11-7 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) +..,1,..+..,.,......................+.rex.+x..-...........1.+....-.. 1..... 1..+ 1.1, Intersection 115 Lincoln St & Riverside Ji Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(/,): 0.881 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.7 Optimal Cycle. 84 Level Of Service C 1,11111T.111111.......1............ik**n...... Street Name: Lincoln St Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R .___ -__-__-__j ----- ...--------- j._______________11---------------- I_...__-_-_-_--___ Contro..1 Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I R: 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0- 0 1 0 00 0 0 l 0 ------------ I ---------------II ---------------- II-__.____-___---- I I -------- _.------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 292 0 80 17.3 1023 0 0 829 246 Growth Adj: 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. Bse: 0 0 0 242 0 80 113 7.023 0 0 829 246 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 Pill' Volume: 0 0 0 242 0 80 113 1023 0 0 829 246 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 242 0 80 113 1023 0 0 829 246 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 7..00 1.00 1.00 cinaI Volume: 0 0 0 242 0 80 113 1023 0 0 829 246 ------------ --------------- II---------------- II------- ...-------- II_ -__....__--____--I Saturati.on Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 7.900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.25 7..00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.23 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1331 0 440 1805 1900. 0 0 1920 427. --------- .__-I --------------- II---------------- II --__----.__--___.I I_______ -___.__--I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.06 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 Crit Moves: .I.. I'll Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.7.1 0.07 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 Uniform Del.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 38.5 46.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 1"3.7 13.'7 Incr emntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 27..2 45.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 InitQuPuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (7.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.7 0.0 59.7 91.6 9.7 0.0 0.0 21.4 21.4 Oser DelAdj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.7 0.0 59.7 91.6 9.7 0.0 0.0 21.4 21.4 LOS by Move: A A A G A E F A A A C C HCM:'IcAVgQ: 0 0 0 13 0 13 6 117 0 0 30 30 .. � ,..... .. ....+..1+.....1..111.�..1... ,...,_1 1,+...11...1., ..1,,.1..1 ,. .. I4ote: Queue reported is the numoer of cars per lane. ..... ..+«+.111...:..,,, ..x.. .1.1,..x..1.........,....:..1,11.1_.,11„ 1.1,. 1. .. ,Iraffi:: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst Alnh+Cumuil+Project PM Tire Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 12-1 ._______________.____.___-______.___-__ Leve]. Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection If,') Lincoln St & Riverside Dr ......... i..... Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Rnnnri West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R --------- .___I --------------- i1 --------------- II --------------- 11______-____--__1 HCM Ops Adjusted ,Lane Otilization Module: .Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 T.ane Group: xxxxx:, xxxx L'I'P LTR LTR L T �;...... "' xxxx .....,0 RT R'1 i41,nsInGrps: 0 0 0 1 1 ]. ]. l 0 0 1 1 .__-______.__-I ---------------- .11--------------- II--------------- 11_______________1 HCM Ops input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrsswalkWid: 8 g 8 8 S Hev Bell: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0" 01, 0?; 0", Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < , , , . � , < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Br: 0 0 C 0 Exc.luSiveRT: Include Include Include Include R'1' Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ ----------------- II --------------- I1--------------- 11----------- .____1 HCH Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 4 xxxx 9 1 Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx --- HCH Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: .,.,r,. ,.,,-.x , 1..00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 7..00 Hev Veh Adj: x:xxxx; x..,_x xxxxx 1-00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: :-;xxx xxxx x 1.00 xxxx 1.00 7..00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxxx :<as xz=xxxx 1.00 xx>:x 1.00 xxxx 1.00 x,,xxxx , x-xx' „ 1.00 1..00 Bus Stp Adj: x;:xx x.._,x: xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: ;:xxx x..,,,. „_..,.x 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx: 1.00 1.00 R'1' Adj : axxo: xxxxx: xxxxx 0.97 x:- o 0.97� x xx. xxxx xxxx 0.97 0.97 x -,x x- LT Adj: xaxxx xxxx: xxxxx 0.96 xxxx 0.96 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxx:: o, x o,. .; .. PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 0.93 1..00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Osr Sat Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1-00 Fnl Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1..00 0.93 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11-_______.__-____I Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < , _ , , , < _ , . < , < < No > > > > > > > ; . > > , Signal Type: < < < < , , < 1, < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > De1Adj Fctr: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 i Traffi:.; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTiNC, IRVINE Exsti- AmbICumuiI+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1].:36:59 Page .1.2-?_ Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base volume Alternative T.ntersection ifs Lincoln St & Riverside Dr **i+kH*#!#i A)A1k++*i1w/4*k*f##1�flkf iif� 1+a>f ti )�)1�F�*A1 �F-A1}-A ihiltl*mss>t1-f i --S1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I. - T - R - 'I' - R L - T - R ____________ ________-_..-____ --------------- ____---------- ----- ...------ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.07 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prog Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 u1: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 8.7 3.1 16.4 0.0 0.0 24.2 24.2 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyAr:rAdl: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 02: 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 4.2 2.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 HCM2KQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 12.9 6.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 29.9 ------------ --------------- II._-------------- .II.--------------- II____________._.__I 70th8Facto,r: 1.20 1.20 1.26 1.17 1.20 1.17 7..19 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.1.5 1.15 HCM2k76thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.1 0.0 1.5.1 7.2 22.1 0.0 0.0 34.3 34.3 ------------ --------------- II II--------------- II____________ --_I 85th8:Factor: 7..60 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.60 1.50 1.55 1.46 1.60 1.60 1.41 1.41. HCM2k85th Q: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 19.2 9.3 27.7 0.0 0.0 42.1 42.1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 90th`1Factor: 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.61. 1.80 1.61 1.70 1.55 1.80 1_BO 1.49 1.49 HCM2k90th Q: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.7 10.2 29.5 0.0 0.0 44.5 44.5 ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ 95thBL'actor: 2.1.0 2.10 2.10 1.79 2.10 1.79 1.93 1.71 2.10 2.10 1.61 1.61 HCM2k95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 23.1 17..6 32.5 0.0 0.0 48.2 48.2 ------------ I--------------- il-------- ------------ I ---------------- I 98th= Factor: 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.07 2.70 2.07 2.33 1.93 2.70 2.70 1..80 1.80 HCM2k98the: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 26.6 14.1 36.7 0.0 0.0 53.8 53.8 'Praffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTi NG, IRVINE Exsti Amb+Cumu]. I -i -Project FM 'Fire Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 paue 12 Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 I1CM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 45 Lincoln St & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound Rnnth Brn and East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- ---- _.---------- II--------------- II--------------- II_______________I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MFH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 0.0 0.0 0.0 58."7 0.0 19.9 2_8.0 148 0.0 0.0 168 49.9 Name: year 1995.composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 74.592 pounds 12.084 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 232.726 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 18.123 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.238 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.852 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: "74.592 pounds 12.084 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 232.726 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 18.123 pounds Hydrocarbons: 3.238 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.852 pounds DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternati.ves or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONo�7;PIING, IRVl NIP. Easti7olib+Cum11il+111-01ect PM TuE Mar 31., 2015 7.1:36:59 Page 13-1 Level Of Service- Computation Report 2000 HCH Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ss+AA+xIIIIIA ,+I+II.IrAAA+�+.<..�xl_I LI�s+.�I Ax LIII+.,.+III Ix+.,AIII ZII IrII+-e intersection if6 W Lakeshore Dr L Riverside Dr I IIt i II III , A A I I I I I I I I I I I i i 1 4 „ AdIIIIIIII=III+IIIA, 1 a I h I I I i I I S i,. I A A I e I I I I i I A l I II Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.786 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.8 Opt.i.mal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service: C 34ki *kA.A R+tIY Ahk*#I))13?kII SIA.]#{fII[,-k+dfk+A'AtI+4+iSi.h*k**+I t, AAi44d*ilihf-R Street Name: W Lakeshore Dr Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - 'I - R ----------- ----------------- -- - --------------- - Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1. 0 2 0 1. 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ -- -------------- ...---------- - Volume Module: Base Vol: 230 350 24 228 242 201 184 802 291 32 '701 338 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 230 350 24 228 292 201 184 802 291 32 707. 338 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 7..00 PER Volume: 230 350 24 228 2.42 201 184 802 297. 32 701. 338 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 230 350 24 228 242 201 184 802 291 32 701 338 PCG Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 230 350 24 228 242 201. 184 802 291 32 701 338 ------------ --------------- II--------------- --------------- II__ --___-_______1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Final Sat.: 1805 3345 229 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------- I -------- .. _.----- 11 ----- II--------------- II_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.22 0.18 0.02 0.37 0.21 Crit Moves: AAII II'I IIIc IAII Green/Cyclo: 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.04 0.47 0.47 Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.42 0.79 0.79 0.40 0.32 0.40 0.79 0.45 Uniform Del: 40.2 40.8 40.8 38.9 38.0 40.4 42.2 12.7 12.1 46.5 22.3 17.8 IncremntDel: 13.1 4.9 4.9 7.8 0.5 1.4.8 15.9 0.1 0.2 3.3 4.7 0.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 53.3 45.7 45.7 46.8 38.5 55.2 S8.1 12.9 12.3 49.8 26.9 18.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 AdjDe1/Veh: 53.3 45.7 45.7 d6.8 38.5 55.2 58.1 12.9 1.2.3 49.8 26.9 18.2 LOS by Move: D D D D D E E B B D C B HCM2kAvg4: 9 7 7 8 4 8 8 7 5 1 20 7 1 1 1 A I I a I * I I I� I. I I, I A I F I, I I 14 l.,, k}IIIIII III I I I I I „+ II A I I I I I I I I I A A I I l I 1 I I I, A I IA Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. I t A I I A I I I I I I , \ , , , k. II II ,-,+, I I I I I I I I k I I I I I t I;IIF I II II i Al I, I III I* I I I I' I I A I I I I I I II Traffic 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, IRVINE ExsL+Amb+Cumuil+Project PM Tue Mar 37., 2015 11.:36:59 Page 16-1 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ........... kwx......... .....+sx+a,� intersection N6 W Lakeshore Dr. & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Last Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'T -- R L - T - R ---------- I-... ------------- II-._ ------------- !I --------------- II - -.-_----I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 1. 0 1 1, 0 1 0 _ 0 1 1 0 _ 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L 'P R i)LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 11. 1 1 1 1 1 ___ I ---------- 11 --------------- ---------------- --------- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 1.a 12 7.2 12 CrsswalkWi.d: 8 8 8 8 Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: Oo 01" Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/lir: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other _ , , " , , t r > Cott Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include x RT Prtct: 0 O 0 0 ------------ --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- II -...-- --------I I4CM Ops f(It) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx I xxxx .,n.... 1 x.._,._ 1 x%xx. xxxx _.__-___--___I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II... --------------I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Bev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1_00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 ....,,_ 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 , :a 1..00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 :.., ,......, x:.:... _,,..,. 0.85 xxxx ._nl... 0.85 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxXx 0.95 xxxr: a 0.95 xxxx xxi:ax PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1..00 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Oar Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0() 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1..00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ful Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 ____ _______________ 11 ----------------------- ------------ Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < _ . . . , , < < < < < < < No > >> > , Signal 'Type: < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > , > . . . , , De.1.Adj Fctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Traffix 8.0.0115 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc_ Licensed to VA CONSULIPTNG, IRVINE Esti-Amb+Cuminl+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Paq_e 14-2 Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (NCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ** 11A1ek#i-eta............. I. . .,li..+xii#Akk*-k#\YY!*S+#tllAi r4+ -1-A a�I11A*Ai-1A.kxA lnteasecti.on #o W Lalcshoae Dr 8 Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'P - R L--- ----------- II _______11_______________ II ---- .___________I Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.04 0.47 0.47 Arrival.Type: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactom 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1: 6.1 5.2 5.2 6.0 3.2 5.4 5.0 6.7 4.4 0.9 16.4 6.3 UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 Q2: 2.7 2.1. 2.1 2.2 0.7 2.6 2.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 3.2 0.8 11CM2RQ11euc: 8.9 7.3 7.3 8.1 3.9 8.0 7.5 7.4 4.9 1.5 19.6 7.1 ------------- 1--------------- II---------------- II_._____.______. _.__II------ ____ ___I 701.113Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.1.9 1.18 1..18 1.18 1..19 1.20 1.16 1.18 11CM2k70thQ: 10.5 8.7 8.7 9.6 4.6 9.5 8.9 8.7 S.8 1.8 22.8 8.4 ------------- ------ _.-------- jj---------- ______11----------------- 11_______ I 85tha Factor: 1..52 1..53 1.53 1.53 1.56 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.56 1.59 1.46 1.54 HCM2k85thQ: 13.5 11.3 11.3 12.4 6.1 12.3 1.1.6 1.1.3 7.6 2.3 28.5 1.0.9 ____ ______--------------- jj---------------- 11--------- 90th3Gactor: 1.66 1.68 1..68 1.67 1.73 1.67 1.67 1.68 1.71 1.77 1.55 1.68 HCM2k90thQ: 14.7 12.3 12.313.6 6.7 13.4 1.2.6 12.4 8.3 2.6 30.4 11..9 ---------- 1--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11--------- _._____1 95th,[Pactor: 1.87 1.90 1..90 1.88 1.98 1.88 1.89 1.90 1.96 2.05 1.70 1.90 HCM2k95thQ: 16.5 13.9 13.9 15.3 7.7 15.1 14.3 14.0 9.5 3.0 33.3 13.5 .. II__...____________jj--------------- 11...___ ___I 98th°:Factor: 2.21. 2.27 2.27 2.23 2.44 2.24 2.26 2.27 2.39 1.59 1..92 2.28 HCM2k98thQ: 19.5 16.6 1.6.6 1.8.2 9.5 17.9 17.1, 16.7 11.6 3.8 37.7 16.2 Traffiz: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE LsstiAmb+Cumuil+project PM Pae Mar 31, 201.5 11:36:69 Page 19-3 ________________________________ Fuel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative *%1k**k�i*{���r}-}}}.FAitiY*finiilA*+*1�l#F-k-k#2�iikt**hAA*iy#-A**tA-11i z#+#}1Ak#*A Intersection H6 W Lakeshore Dr & Riverside Dr twit**2*f'♦ �Y�A]}i*it Ll�*}*#.Yi1v♦#*1-,* 1Yt#**1!�-I fk#**i}�*]**++A)el-!**t%l k> -F*## Approach: North Bound South Bound Fasr R",nd West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - 'I - R L - I - R L ------------ I--------------- II---------------- _ Run Speed: 30 MPD 30 RP11 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfStops: 55.2 E33.5 5.7 53.B 59.6 98.3 99.6 7.15 39.5 7.8 197 56.7 -_.____-_______________-__________-__.__-___-_______ Name: year 1.995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 7.22.902 pounds 19.829 noIlolls Carbon Dioxide: 381.894 pocnds Carbon Monoxide: 30.328 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.607 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.374 pounds ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 122.902 pounds 19.829 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 381.899 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 30.328 pounds Hydrocarbons: 5.607 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 1.379 pounds -------------------------------------- __--_.__-_.___________--___-____-____-___-____ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAFFIX_ Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 'Praffix 8.0.0915 (c) 2008 howling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Er:st+Amb+CumuiI+Project PM Toe Mar 31, 2015 1.7.:36:59 Page 15-1. ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 1 -ICM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection V High School Gntranco & Riverside Or nil�lll#ifilYiA1*+i+A2A**-A***41A1***x*nxiYrt*a"li�?+S #A :i+iia},}�}i)ixa k-Fy k�a %#wY Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(Y): 0.375 Loss time (sec): B Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.5 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A *#+t+�a*1tYi<tt+*k#ita}i ktA+*1l Al kt+-k1Ji A1A#kif\4'YiA+'*f%kl*11#**1!11.1 Fr.A11AAAAA Street Name: High School Entrance Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Pound west Bound Movement: L - T - R LL - T - R L - 'F - R L - It - R _ --- --- _._.__.__.1. --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- 11____-__-_______I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Man. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II-------------- ...II......_.._...._.__. -.__..__.......I I_. _..__...__-_______I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 0 9 28 0 18 19 1098 3 ll 821 25 Growth Adj: 7..00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial. 13se: 3 0 9 28 0 18 19 1.098 3 11 821 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.(70 1.00 1.00 PlIF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 0 9 28 0 18 19 1098 3 11 821 25 Deduct Vol: G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 0 9 28 0 18 19 1098 3 11 821. 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina].Volume: 3 0 9 28 0 18 19 1098 3 1.1 821 25 ---------- --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/,Lana: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.25 0.00 0.75 0.61 0.00 0.39 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.99 0.06 Final Sat.: 922 0 1266 1062 0 683 1805 3600 10 1805 3989 106 ---------- I --------------- II___........__.___._____il--------------- Capacity - Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0-00 0.03 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: i*** 11.1 I'll *'*k Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.0'7 0.03 0.81 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.80 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.29 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.29 0.29 Uni.form Del: 98.5 0.0 98.5 99.9 0.0 99.9 97.8 2.5 2.5 98.7 2.5 2.5 lncremnt Del: 7.2 0.0 7.2 1.9 0.0 1.9 3.4 0.1 0.1 7.9 0.1 0.1. InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 55.7 0.0 55.7 96.3 0.0 96.3 5i..1 2.6 2.6 56.5 Z.6 2.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad-iDe1/Veh: 55.7 0.0 55.7 96.3 0.0 96.3 51.1 2.6 2.6 56.5 2.6 2.6 LOS by Move: E A E D A D D A A E A A 11CM2kAvgQ: 1 0 I_ ._ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. 4ial,-1,*x]*iia+1F#+-h�Fd+kff.k*it„ii sk++II II tk.#,,,,;-IIIII..a, 'Praffi_>: 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSUL`1 LNG, IRVNE PxssLidnnh+CumuiIIProject 17M Tue Mar 31, 2015 1.1:36:59 Page 16-1 .._________________________..--- ---_____-------._------______---_------_-_______--""_ Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HIM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative L 1111*.IxI4� 1.4IaI+.111++.I,IxI*>.I I111 x1.*x.1+**+*+**II,I*Ix+I11xs+++*x*.w*x* 'Cnte,rsectiou 147 High School Entrance & Riverside Or I I I I I I I I + I I 1331. 11 I 11, I I A I i k I a i i I I I I I I , , II*M,**IIIIIAIII„ 3*+ I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I + I I I Approach: NOrth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound MuvemeuL: L - T - H n - Y - 8 L - 11' - R L - 11' - R ------------ I ---------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11 -----------I HCM Ops Adjusted Sane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1, 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT #LnslnGrps: 1 1 1, 1 1 1. 1 2 2 1 2 ------------- I ------ ...-------- II --------------- II--------------- II------------- HCM Ops rnput Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 1, 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 17 CrsswalkWid: 8 8 6 8 r. Nov Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0'S 01; Oo Oo Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area 'Type: _ I < < , Other > > . > > > > , > > > . . , , > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0� PxclusfveRT: Include Include Include Include % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---I HCM Ops f-(lt) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 9 oxxx 9 9 xxxx 9 1, xxxx xxxx 1 ------------ I --------------- II ----- _--------- II--------------- II --------------- HCH ------ ----HCH Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 x...... 1.00 1.00 Sl..n_. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11ev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 x_.x_. :1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 x..._.. 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.90 xxxx 0.90 0.95 xxxx 0.95 xxxx 1.00 .1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.99 x:-;xx 0.99 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxt.'._ PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Us,r Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 MLP Sat Adi: i.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 FRI Sat Adj: 0.89 1.00 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: � . < < < < , < < I , , , < < No > > > > > > > > > > > , , . > > Signal Type: I < < � < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > . DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Traffic. 8.0.07:;5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Fist+lamb+Cumuil b Project PM Tue Mer 37., 207.5 11:36:59 Page 16-2 Level. Of Service Detailed Computat.i.on Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCM Opc,rations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #7 High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound .South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- 11.--------------- 11 --------------- II Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0-02 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.81 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.80 Ar,rivalType: 3 3 3 3 Prot' Factor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 7._00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ql: 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 7..2 0.4 4.3 4.3 0.3 3.2 3.2 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FarJ.yArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2: 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 9CM2K0ueue: 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.8 4.9 4.9 0.8 3.6 3.6 I---------------- II--------------- II------ ...-------- II --------------..-I 70th%Factor: 1.20 1.20 1-20 1.20 1..20 1.20 1.20 1.7.9 1.i9 1.20 1.19 1..19 9CM21:70thQ: 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.7. 0.0 2.1 0.9 5.8 5.8 1.0 4.3 4.3 ------------ 1--------------- 11__________.__.__II--------------- 11______--------_I 85th8Factor: 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.58 1.60 1.58 1.59 1.55 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.57 9CM2k85thQ: 1.3 0.0 1.3 2.8 0.0 2.8 1..2 7.6 7.6 1.3 5.6 5.6 ----------- ._.--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11_.---_____------I 90th8Factor: 1.78 1.80 1..78 1.77 1.80 1..77 1.79 1.71 1.71 7..78 1-'73 1.73 HCM2k90thQ: 1.5 0.0 1.5 3.2 0.0 3.2 1.4 8.4 8.4 1.4 6.2 6.2 ------------ 1--------------- 11-------------- ...11--------------- 11____--_______--I 95th€,,Factor: 2.07 2.10 2.07 2.04 2.10 2.04 2.08 1.96 1.96 2.07 1.99 1.99 9CM2k95thQ: 1.7 0.0 1.7 3.6 0.0 3.6 1.6 9.6 9.6 1.6 7.1 7.1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- li-_._.____.._--_.____11_______________I 98tha Factor: 2.64 2.70 2.64 2.57 2.70 2.57 2.64 2.39 2.39 2.69 2.96 2.96 HCM2k98thQ: 2.2 0.0 2.2 4.6 0.0 4.6 2.0 11.7 11.7 2.1, 8.8 8.8 R affix 8.0.0715 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Liceia ed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Exst+Amb-[Cumuil+project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 page 16-3 Fuel. Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ..eaaee.......it.�e Litersection V High School Entrance & Riverside Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Rnnnd mast Round Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R ------------ I. -------- _------ II --------------- II --------------- II_______. -_______I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPI{ 30 MPH 30 MPII NumOfStops: 0.7 0.0 2.2 6.7 0.0 4.3 3.4 73-3 0.2_ 2.7 52.6 1.6 ___ ----------------- ________________...________-____________-..____ Name: year 1995 composite fleet Fuel Consumption: 28.628 pounds 4.638 gallons Carlon Dio.-;ide: 89.318 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 5.887. pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.758 pounds Nitrogen O -tides: 0.322 pounds Name: year 2000 composite fleet Fuel. Consumption: 28.628 pounds 1.638 gallons Carbon D,i.oxide: 89.31.8 pounds Carbon Monoaj.de: 5.861 pounds hydrocarbons: 0.758 pounds Nitrogen O.ides: 0.322 pounds __ --------------------------------- __...________________----------------- .________ DISCLAIMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric desiq_n alternatives or for general planning appI i. cations, as these calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAPFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. 'fraffj.>: 8.0.07].5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOI.TING, IRVINE Esst[-Amb-ICumuiIIProtect PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:`_+9 Page 1.7-1. Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #B Stadium Way a Riverside. Dr fi\1AY%1�%fY�aetkkxi+ilxif#k-A AilAl ki:�-A AAk1l*-k-kaki***!k***A#k>**#MA***#*A***+s tk* Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vel./Cap.(N): 0.359 Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.3 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of. Service: A Street Name: Stadium Way Riverside Or Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------- ...-....__II --------------- II--------------- II--------------- Control: --------------ControL Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------- --..._...---------- II--------------- II--------------- II -------._--.__._.._-I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 1076 10 776 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 1076 2 10 776 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PLiF Volume: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 1076 10 776 50 Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 1076 2 10 776 50 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 0 9 37 0 32 33 107E 2 10 776 50 l----------- ---- Saturation Plow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 i9o0 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.O0 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.88 0.12 rinal Sat.: 1584 0 1584 1805 0 1615 1805 3603 7 1805 3361 217 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- I --------------- ------ --I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: I I ^ k 'kIII I I I I I>+- Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.83 0.83 0.02 0.78 0.78 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.30 0.29 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.29 0.29 Uniform Del: 49.5 0.0 48.7 45.4 0.0 44.4 44.8 2.0 2.0 48.7 3.0 3.0 In w-emntDel: 4.1 0.0 6.5 2.1 0.0 1.6 1.5 G.1 0.1 7.8 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 53.6 0.0 S'i.2 47.5 0.0 46.0 46.3 2.1 2.1 56.5 3.1 3.1, User Delidlj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.6 0.0 5. 2 47.5 0.0 96.0 96.3 2.1 2.1 56.5 3.1 3.1 LOS by Move: D A IG D A D D A A E A A HCM2kAv gQ: 0 0 1 _ 0 1. 9 9 1 4 4 Note Queue reported is Che numnnr of ca,r, per lane�...,..c�.�..._.�,..,.��+ ,.rs Traffi:c 8.0.0715 (c) ?608 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Gast+Amb-1Cumui1+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 1',:36:59 Page 18-1 ____--_-._-_______---...______________--.__.-____________--"- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative **A -1k Ff *iyi,*1+Af:**I)111*#+*AAA 1-F#311111 Ar+*#*1)F*}yy�i 41k-+*# +a1i11 i -i1 \AAAA Intersecticui iib Stadium Way & Riverside Dr #+i1ti*1**3-1-1A#*3*1*Yh) „ k#+1a�1Ai #433AAA1t**1*ilia+,#xvF„ IA11S1 +-Llx*h+SIk+S1L Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Lound West Bound Movement: L - T - P. L - T - R L T R L T R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II------- ...------- II - ----------I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 :I. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR L xxxx R L R'IR'I L RT RT i4Lns:I:nGrps: 2 2 1 1 0 a 1 2 2 1 2 ---------- I --------------- ! I -----------I I___-_.__...- 1------------1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 1.2 12 12 12 12 :t2 12 12 1.2 12 12 12 Crsswa.lkWid: 8 8 8 8 Bev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0'„ 0'i: 01 0'; Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type: < < < I < < < < < , < < , , , Other _ . _ , _ I > > � > . > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Lxclusi.veRT: Include Include Include Include -n R'1' Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II ---------------- I I --------------- II--------------- I HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(lt) Case: 9 xxxx 9 1 xxxx xxxx xa>:x xxxx 1 x,...,, xxa:x ------------ I --------------- II ---------------- I I__ ------11---- ---I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Ln Wad Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx: I_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Parking Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 ,.xxx xxxx 1.00 ,.,..,x 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1..00 xxxx xxax 1.00x :L.OG 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 x%x, Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 xxxx 0.89 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ..xxx 0.99 0.99 LT Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.95 x>axx rxxxx 0.95 a.,_x 0.95 xxxx xxxrx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1..00 1.00 1.00 1..00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.88 1..00 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1..00 ]..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fn1 Sat Adj: 0.83 0.95 0.83 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.99 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- Delay --_----- -Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No , , , > , > > > > > Signal 'Type: < , < < < < << < Actuated . > > > . , , > , < > . . DelAdj Fctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.\00 1.00 1.00 I I. I I I c II I f{ i# 11 11 I, I I A I# I I I f I I I I A 1 I I I A A I f X n 11418 „l -k w a I I I 11111# 1, I A I,.# t l f l>:+1} Tra,f,fax 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, IRVINE Er,st+Anfb+Cu,iuiLi-Project PM 'rue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 18-2 Level 0£ Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method) 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative 11111x11-1 l++Il „ F.exxa1111+1-111-. u+�sa+-,1e,.I-x-x IuI I Intersection 03 Stadium Way t Ri.versd.de Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'T - R L - T - R ---------- --------------- II------- _.------- II--------------- II__._____________I Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.83 0.83 0.02 0.78 0.78 Arrival'Pype: 3 3 3 3 ProgFactor: 1.00 '1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 L_00 Ql: 0.1 0.0 0.3 7..0 0.0 0.8 0.9 3.8 3.8 0.3 3.4 3.4 OpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Opst reamldj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RarlyArrAdj: 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 7..00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q2 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 HCM2I<Queue: 0.4 0.0 0.7 1.5 0.0 1.3 1.3 9.3 4.3 0.7 3.8 3.8 _._._---------- ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------- 7 Oth',, ____---____-__70thO Pact or: 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.7.9 1.19 11CM2 k70LIO: 0.5 0.0 0.9 1.8 0.0 1.5 1.5 5.2 5.2 0.9 4.5 4.5 --- ___.._....____I --------------- II.--------------- II--------------- II_______________I 85th°Factor: 1.60 1.60 1.59 7..59 1.60 1.59 7..59 1.56 1.56 1.59 1.56 1.56 HCM2 k85th4: 0.6 0.0 1.1 2.9 0.0 2.0 2-0 6.8 G.8 1.2 5.9 5.9 ._______________II---------------- II---------------- II--------------- I 90th';Factor: 1.7° i.80 1.79 1.77 1.80 1.78 1..78 1.72 1.72 1.79 1.73 1.73 HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 0.0 1.3 2.7 0.0 2.2 2.3 7.5 7.5 1.3 6.6 6.6 __________-------------- II --------------- 11 - -------_..._.._ II --------------- I 95th],Factor: 2.09 2.10 2.O8 2.05 2.10 2.06 2.06 1..97 1.97 2.08 1.99 1.99 HCM2 k95thQ: 0.8 0.0 1..5 3.1 0.0 2.6 2.6 8-6 8.6 1.5 7.5 7.5 ...___________ ----------- --H --------------- 1 1---- I I---..__........_._........--- 1 98tll"Pactor: 2.67 2.70 2.65 2.59 2.70 2.61 2.61 2.42 2.42 2.64 2.45 2_95 HCM2k98thQ: 1.1 0.0 1.9 3.9 0.0 3.3 3.3 10.5 10.5 2.0 9.3 9.3 TiaL£ii; 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSOLTING, 1RVINF. Exst [Amb +Cumuil+Project PM Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:36:59 Page 18-3 Puel Consumption and Emissions 2000 HCH Operations Method Base Volume Alternative I I I + I I +x#+tiI,l-+x.f..Yz„ v, I , . I........,+ a a h}Y a .. Al+Sd i... l i n., w 1++#aa........ i++ Intersection #8 Stadium Way 6 Riverside Dr Y,*#A**T4*i�'A 1Alii}#*-1A1tt3y+X11AI k= -A tx k�44-F -A**iii.......*ktf*+++*..Ani...... 4Yt#* Approach: North Bound South Rrnmd Rast Rnnn,i West Round Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --- ...._____------II___------- 11 -----------I Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH NumOfS'Cops: 0.7 0.0 2.2 8.9 0.0 7.6 7.9 64.6 0.1 2.5 59.2 3.5 ----------------------------------------- .__---___-----------__------_____ Name: year 1995 composite .fleet Fuel Consumption: 29.796 pounds 4.827 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 92.965 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 6.27.0 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.831 pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.334 pounds ----- _------------------------------------- ..__---_____.....-------------------------------- Name: ______---------------_-.---_Name: year 2000 composite fleet Pont Consumption: 29.796 Pounds 4.827 gallons Carbon Dioxide: 92.965 pounds Carbon Monoxide: 6.210 pounds Hydrocarbons: 0.831 Pounds Nitrogen Oxides: 0.334 pounds --------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- DISCLATMER The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with caution and only fon: comparisons of different signal timings, geometric design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these calculations are applied to the, analysis of a single intersection within the CCG and TRAPPIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system elements. Troths 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VA CONSULTING, li2VINE CITY OF L ULSINORT DREAM EXrREMF:. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Honorable Chairperson Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager DATE: April 21, 2015 PROJECT: Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2014-02 — A Request for Approval of Amendments to a Previously Approved Specific Plan for Tentative Tract Map No. 33267 Residential Design Review (RDR) No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements, for Tentative Tract Map No. 33267 APPLICANT Peter M. Olah, Paradigm Engineering Group, 427 E. Seventeenth St. #261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Take testimony from any interested parties in attendance who have responded to the Notice of Public Hearing; and, 2. Provide direction to staff on the appropriateness of the application; and 3. Keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's April 21, 2015 regular meeting. Proiect Location The approximately twenty (20) acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, Assessor Parcel Number(S) 379-050-006/034, 387- 180-001, 387-170-04/006, 387-080-003/004, 379-050-034, and 379-050-034/006. Attachment 5 SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 2 of 8 Environmental Setting Background On August 15, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09). On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications. Project Description Previously Approved Project The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 2005-01) is an infill residential project on an approximately twenty (20) acre site. The approved project features 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each. A community recreation facility and recreational vehicle storage area is also identified. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 The proposed project modifies Specific Plan No. 2005-01 as described: • Updates General Plan Designation and consistency to reflect the updates to the General Plan that were approved subsequently to the approval of the project. • Updates technical studies to include the most recent information. • Updates the site planning to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the architectural guidelines to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the fence and wall plan to reflect the modified residential product. • Adds additional details for the provided community amenities that were not previously included. This specifically deals with the park area and the addition of the play equipment, shade structure, and BBQ areas. EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project Site Vacant Specific Plan Specific Plan North Commercial Commercial Park (CP) Future Specific Plan "P" South East Residential County Unincorporated County Vacant/Mobile Home Commercial Park CP Future Specific Plan "I' West Apartments/Vacant High Density Res. (R-3), Med. Density Res. (R-2), Lovd Densit Res. R-1 Future Specific Background On August 15, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09). On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications. Project Description Previously Approved Project The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 2005-01) is an infill residential project on an approximately twenty (20) acre site. The approved project features 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each. A community recreation facility and recreational vehicle storage area is also identified. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 The proposed project modifies Specific Plan No. 2005-01 as described: • Updates General Plan Designation and consistency to reflect the updates to the General Plan that were approved subsequently to the approval of the project. • Updates technical studies to include the most recent information. • Updates the site planning to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the architectural guidelines to reflect the modified residential product. • Updates the fence and wall plan to reflect the modified residential product. • Adds additional details for the provided community amenities that were not previously included. This specifically deals with the park area and the addition of the play equipment, shade structure, and BBQ areas. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 3 of 8 Residential Design Review The proposed project modifies the previously approved Residential Design Review No. 2005-09 by changing the condominium type from 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each to 163 single-family condominium residences. The proposed modification increases the number of units by 17. Furthermore the proposed project modifies the previously approved design to incorporate a higher quality aesthetic that is incorporated into the modified building types. The proposed 163 residences will feature three floor plans and three architectural styles, thus providing for 18 different potential product types. The proposed design incorporates enhanced elevations on those elevations that are exposed to public areas. Floor Plans for Residences • Plan 1: Two-story 1,641 square foot units with three bedrooms; 2. 5 baths; great room; dining room, kitchen, laundry, and two -car garage • Plan 1X: Two-story 1,631 square foot units with three bedrooms; 2.5 baths; great room; dining room, kitchen, laundry; and two -car garage. • Plan 2: Two-story 1,845 square foot units with four bedrooms (option 3 bedroom and loft), 2.5 baths, great room; kitchen; dining room; laundry; and two -car garage. • Plan 2X: Two-story 1,836 square foot units with four bedrooms (option 3 bedroom and loft); 2.5 baths; great room; kitchen; dining room;; laundry; and two - car garage. • Plan 3: Two-story 2,153 square foot units with four bedrooms; 3.0 baths; great room; dining room; kitchen; laundry, and two -car garage. • Plan 4: Two-story 2,485 square foot units with four bedrooms (optional office and loft); 3.5 baths; great room; dining room; kitchen; tech space, laundry; and two - car garage. Architectural Styles The architectural character of the community will consist of three (3) distinctive, yet compatible, architectural styles. A. Spanish Colonial B. Craftsman C. Tuscan SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 4 of 8 Each of the accepted architectural styles employ common textures of white to pastel and earthen tone colors, stucco or stone walls, tile and shingle roofs, similar roof pitches, and simple ornamentation and details. The three architectural styles accepted within The Village at Lakeshore are outlined below. Each distinctive style is briefly outlined by its key design characteristics and elements, and by design criteria specific to The Village at Lakeshore. Spanish Style Building and Massing 1. Mixture of 1 and 2 -story forms. Roofs. 1. Simple hip or gable roofs 2. Low pitch roofs, typically 3:12 to 5:12 3. Barrel roof tiles, typically reddish to tobacco 4. Eaves flush with wall or exposed rafter tails; Windows and Doors in color. overhanging beam shapes at ends. 1. Arched doorways and window openings. 2. Some windows deeply recessed and some having molded surroundings. 3. Vertical windows, typically with divided lines. 4. Doors which are typically natural or stained dark wood. 5. Simple plank shutters (if provided). Materials and Colors I. Stucco finish achieving a smooth wall plane and thick appearance. 2. Wood used typically as accent trim, doors, porch or balcony railings only. 3. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, primarily white, off-whites and tones of peach or sandy pink. Accents and Details 1. Colored ceramic tiles used on steps, around openings and on patio walls. 2. Wrought iron or wood balcony railings. 3. Chimney caps to be stucco or clay tile. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 5 of 8 Craftsman Style Building and Massing 1. Front porch as major element of elevation. 2. Gable and shed roofs. 3. Horizontal massing with 1 and 2 -story elements. Roofs 1. Low pitch roofs, typically 3:12 to 4:12 2. Flat or shingle tiles. 3. Wide eave overhangs with exposed rafter tails. Windows and Doors 1. Simple wood (or wood -simulated fiberglass) doors with wood trim surroundings. 2. Covered door entry, sometimes raised. 3. Simple windows with wood trim surroundings. 4. Windows typically, vertical, may be grouped as horizontal elements. 5. Louvered shutters (if provided). Materials and Color 1. Wood, shingle, brick, stone or stucco finish siding in horizontal banding. 2. Stucco is sand finish and matches other siding color. 3. Roof material is flat concrete or wood shake. 4. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, light earth tone colors with contrasting trim color. Accents and Details 1. Tapered porch columns (wood or stucco) on brick or stone pilasters to mark entries. 2. Wood braces at gable ends. 3. Chimneys - wood siding, brick or stone veneer. Tuscan Style Building and Massing 1. Mixture of 1 and 2 -story forms. 2. Simple hip or gable roofs. 3. Recessed and covered entries. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 6 of 8 Roofs 1. Medium pitch roofs, typically 4:12 to 6:12 2. Barrel roof tiles, typically reddish to tobacco in color. 3. Simple, short roof overhangs. Windows and Doors 1. Typically rectangular or round headed door and window openings. 2. Some windows recessed and some having exterior stucco plant -on and sills. 3. Windows typically comprised of several small panes rather than single large one. 4. Doors are typically natural or stained dark, "heavy" wood. Materials and Colors 1. Smooth stucco finish with hand -toweled or mottled look. 2. Use of wood, tile or brick as design accents only. 3. Color palette to reinforce architectural style, primarily white, off-whites or light pastels. 4. Accent colors typically used on cornice band and window articulations. Accents and Details Columns and archways. Covered walks, patios and entries should be enriched with textured paving. Chimney caps to repeat cornice band treatment and trim color. Recreational Amenities A Craftsman style recreational facility will be provided in the center of the community. The facility will consist of a swimming pool, spa, restrooms and shower facility to be utilized by community residents and their guests. In addition to the recreational facility, an active turf area and active park area that includes a play structure, shade area, and BBQ areas. Landscaping Decorative monumentation walls, gates and paving will be provided at both entrances into the project. Moreover, specimen trees including will be utilized at the entrances, augmented by a variety of shrubs and ground cover. A decorative sound wall will be erected along the Highway 74 frontage that will incorporate slump block with split face block accents and pilasters. The pilasters will have pointed and bull -nose caps. A six- foot wide landscaped planter will occur outside both the Highway 74 and Grand Avenue walls behind the sidewalk. The pool area will incorporate a 6'-0" high decorative stucco finish block wall with ledger stone pilasters and 6'-0" high tubular steel fence with ledger SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 7 of 8 stone pilasters. Street trees will consists of London Plane and Magnolia trees augmented with various shrubs and ground cover. Plantings within the interior of the site will be achieved in front of residential buildings and along street side and rear yard situations. Decorative Street and parking lot lighting will be erected throughout the site along with architecturally treated common mailbox structures. Analysis The proposed project has a General Plan Designation of Specific Plan, is located in the Lake View Planning District, and has a Zoning designation of Specific Plan. The amendment to the specific plan and the residential design review are consistent with the General Plan. The Specific Plan as amended is consistent with the Residential Design Review. The proposed residential project provides a high quality design that incorporates efficient site planning. The proposed detached condominiums creates a hybrid of traditional single family dwelling units and traditional attached condominiums that incorporate the best elements of the two. The overall architectural elements enhanced elevations, architectural variations, and building plane articulations to create an architecturally interesting and avoids the appearance of sheer walls. The conceptual landscaping has been effectively incorporated to help offset the visual impacts of the proposed project and has been conditioned for final review and approval by the City to ensure the final landscape plan/palette is consistent with the conceptual plan. The applicant has proposed adequate internal recreational amenities and has been conditioned to pay appropriate park in -lieu fees to mitigate potential impacts do the increased residential units. All potential impacts of the proposed project have been identified and mitigated as part of the Environmental Review process. The gated community allows for the maintenance of internal roads, lights, sidewalks, and other improvements to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association, thereby reducing the potential adverse financial impacts associated with the development to the City. Further, the proposed project has been conditioned to Annex into CFD 2015-1 (Safety) Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services CFD to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Additionally the proposed project has been conditioned to form Community Facilities District to offset the fiscal impact of the proposed landscape and lighting located in the public right of way areas. Overall the applicant has proposed a high quality residential product. The proposed project is largely consistent with the previous approvals. The proposed development has been adequately conditioned to ensure the physical impacts of the project have been mitigated. The proposed adverse fiscal impacts of the initial development and the SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 April 21, 2015 Page 8 of 8 ongoing maintenance have been conditioned as such that the proposed project would not impact the City Draft Conditions of Approval have been included for review by the Planning Commission. Final Conditions of Approval will be presented when the proposed project is brought back for final review and action. Environmental Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was approved by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. Due to the age of the technical reports and the modifications proposed, an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and is currently being reviewed and will be presented when the proposed project is brought back for final review and action. Prepared By: Justin Kirk, Senior Planner Approved By: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Attachments: 1. Locations Maps 2. Draft Conditions of Approval 3. Updated Specific Plan 4. Design Review Package C I'TY O F LADE LSINORE DREAM EX1-RE1vIF, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Honorable Chairperson Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager DATE: May 5, 2015 PROJECT: Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2014-02 — A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (The Village at Lakeshore) Proposing a Single -Family Detached Condominium Project. Residential Design Review (RDR) No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Units and Related Improvements. APPLICANT Peter M. Olah, Paradigm Engineering Group, 427 E. Seventeenth St. #261 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 for the Development of 163 Residential Units Located at the Northwest Corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- I A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopt Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07, Located at the Northwest Corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 May 5, 2015 Page 2 of 5 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan) Located at the Northwest Corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units Located at the Northwest Corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, and Related Improvements. Background On April 21, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed Specific Plan Amendment 2014- 02 and Residential Design Review 2014-07 and provided comments and direction to staff on the proposed project. The item was continued to May 5, 2015 due to the need to complete SB 18 Native American consultation and to finalize the environmental document. Planning Commission comments and questions have also been addressed. Project Description/Location The proposed project modifies the previously approved Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09 by changing the condominium type from 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each to 163 single- family condominium residences. The proposed modification increases the number of units by 17. Furthermore the proposed project modifies the previously approved design to incorporate a higher quality aesthetic that is incorporated into the modified building types. The proposed 163 residences will feature six floor plans and three architectural styles, thus providing for 18 different potential product types. The proposed design incorporates enhanced elevations on those elevations that are exposed to public areas. The approximately twenty (20) acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, Assessor Parcel Number(S) 379-050-006, 379-050- 034, 387-170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387-080-003/004, and 387-080-004. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 May 5, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Environmental Setting Previously Approved Development Plan (The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan) On August 15, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09). On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications. Project Revisions The following is a consolidated list of questions and comments received from the Planning Commission with the response in italics directly following: • Page 2-1- Park In -lieu fee: The applicant stated approximately $245K to be paid in the presentation. Is this based on original dwelling unit count? They've increased DUs. No, the original project was conditioned to pay $1,600 per unit, for a total of $233,000, the approximate amount stated of $245,000 included the increase in number of units. In order to reduce confusion and ensure that accurate fees are paid at the time of permit issuance, Condition #107 has been modified as follows: "Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay Quimby Act in -lieu fees at the rates in effect at the time of payment." • Table 6-1: "Main Structures" require 12' minimum setbacks - Plans only show 10'. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Table 6-1: Building Height states 25'-0" max height- Elevations of plan 3 exceeds that. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Page 6-3: Missing keynote (9) stating residents no longer required to park in their garages. Modified language has been added to reflect the inclusion of garage parking and the available side street parking. EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING ` Project Site Vacant Specific Plan Specific Plan North Commercial Commercial Park (CP) Future Specific Plan "P" South Residential Count Unincor orated Count East Vacant/Mobile Home Commercial Park (CP) Future Specific Plan "I" West Apartments/Vacant High Density Res. (R-3), Med. Density Res. (R-2), Low Density Res. R-1 Future Specific Previously Approved Development Plan (The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan) On August 15, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09). On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and its related applications. Project Revisions The following is a consolidated list of questions and comments received from the Planning Commission with the response in italics directly following: • Page 2-1- Park In -lieu fee: The applicant stated approximately $245K to be paid in the presentation. Is this based on original dwelling unit count? They've increased DUs. No, the original project was conditioned to pay $1,600 per unit, for a total of $233,000, the approximate amount stated of $245,000 included the increase in number of units. In order to reduce confusion and ensure that accurate fees are paid at the time of permit issuance, Condition #107 has been modified as follows: "Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay Quimby Act in -lieu fees at the rates in effect at the time of payment." • Table 6-1: "Main Structures" require 12' minimum setbacks - Plans only show 10'. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Table 6-1: Building Height states 25'-0" max height- Elevations of plan 3 exceeds that. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Page 6-3: Missing keynote (9) stating residents no longer required to park in their garages. Modified language has been added to reflect the inclusion of garage parking and the available side street parking. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 May 5, 2015 Page 4 of 5 • Zoning Designation (pg 6-5) states home s/f range from 1737 to 2316 s/f. Plan 4 exceeds this. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Siting Criteria (pg 6-9) states units to be placed with varying elevations - NOT varying color schemes. The home elevations are identical. Mirroring the same elevation is not variety. Specific Plan has been updated to reflect consistency. • Outdoor lighting (pg 6-14) states 3 different light poles. For 2 city blocks on a circular street? This will appear schizophrenic. The Specific Plan has been modified to reflect the inclusion of one street light and specific exterior lighting based upon the design of the building. • Inclusion of the 5'-0" offsets to the perimeter wall should be retained, as detailed in the original Specific Plan. The original specific plan detailed a 5'-0" offset to be added every 50 feet to the perimeter wall, a pilaster every added every 50 feet and a four (4) foot planter area. During the preliminary review of the modifications to the Specific Plan, the elimination of the offsets was discussed. Due to safety concerns and development constraints the offsets were determined appropriate to be removed with the caveat that the landscape buffer area be increased to 6'- 0". The intent was to adequately soften the wall while eliminating the problems. Condition #6 was added to ensure this increased landscape area is included in the final Specific Plan document. • The remnant corner parcel should be improved to include a sidewalk along the perimeter of the wall where existing pedestrian access is unimproved. Additionally the General Plan designates the Grand and Riverside as a gateway intersection so a monument sign depicting the entrance to the Lakeview District should be required. If the sidewalk improvements and sidewalk cannot be made on the adjacent parcel, then the adjacent wall residential units should be moved north 5'-0" to accommodate said improvements. The adjacent parcel is not under common ownership with the lots included in the requested entitlements, thus requiring improvements on the adjacent private property as a Condition of Approval is difficult to enforce. A sidewalk has already been installed along the right-of-way and the Street Improvement Plans do not specify any additional improvements to be made. The applicant has expressed significant concern regarding these requirements and the corollary modifications to the design. Some discussions at the Design Review Committee was made about adding some planting areas not depicted on the plans in the area that the wall is exposed, no final determination was made. Additional consideration adding this increased area as a Condition of Approval may be appropriate for the Planning Commission to discuss. • Vinyl fencing should be added instead of wood fence. Condition of Approval No. 32 was amended to reflect this requirement. SPA 2014-02 and RDR 2014-07 May 5, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Environmental Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was approved by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. All technical studies included previously prepared were updated as needed and the new information was included in the Addendum. Any new mitigation measures that were previously prepared were updated if needed to account for new information. The combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. Prepared By: Justin Kirk, Senior Planner Approved By: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Staff Report from April 21, 2015, Planning Commission Meeting 6. Updated Specific Plan 7. Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 14) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-653 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 8/1812815 CITY OE LAK_L�LSII` OR.E Z_ DREAM EXTREME - REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPMENT Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form. Background Beginning in April, 2014, the City of Lake Elsinore engaged Development Management Group, Inc. (AKA DMG Economics) to provide specific economic development professional services related to market research, retail recruitment and serving as a project ombudsperson. In September, 2014 the Contract was amended to include an extension to cover through FY 2014/2015. During the past approximately 15 months, DMG Economics has: 1. Served as a project ombudsman on the proposed Wal-Mart project. An EIR is underway and the project is expected to be presented to City Council by the end of 2015 for consideration. 2. Represented the City at ICSC-Las Vegas introducing the City to over 30 retailers. Much of the follow-up was the responsibility of staff and the results are sometimes a year or two out. That said, Wyndham Hotels has a site under contract and DMG has completed market analysis specific to hotel users. DMG ECONOMICS June 23, 2015 Page 2 3. Generated a retail market opportunity analysis that has been widely distributed to retailers, brokers and developers. 4. Utilized internal resources lu complete due diligence on potential business partners to the City of Lake Elsinore. 5. Represented Lake Elsinore at both ICSC-San Diego and Retail Live introducing the City to an additional 20+ retailers and brokers. Discussion As the City of Lake Elsinore continues to grow, it is imperative that we take the appropriate steps to encourage additional economic investment in our community. In a post -RDA environment, it is essential that communities such as Lake Elsinore find resources which can provide it the greatest potential to expand our economy while minimizing the financial burden to the City and our taxpayers. In working with DMG Economics over the last 15+ months, it is obvious that they have the expertise, contacts, organizational, marketing and salesmanship skills necessary to drive economic investment in our community. Most recently, we have asked DMG Economics to provide the City a comprehensive proposal that would expand its services to function in more full economic development capacity. Presented for City Council consideration is a proposed professional services agreement and Scope of Work. A few highlights of the services include: 1. Creation of a 5 -year Economic Development Strategic Plan. 2. Implementation of said plan upon completion (scheduled prior to the end of 2015). 3. Serve as project ombudsman for the proposed Wal-Mart and other major commercial development projects proposed or under application in the City of Lake Elsinore. 4. Follow-up in regards to development and retail leads (generated at ICSC, Retail Live and organically within the City/community). 5. Coordinate with the Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce to provide appropriate professional support to assist them with franchise recruitment. 6. Demographic research for the City of Lake Elsinore and the surrounding market area. DMG ECONOMICS June 23, 2015 Page 3 7. Retail market opportunity analysis for the City of Lake Elsinore and the surrounding market area. 8. Produce an ongoing electronic marketing campaign (specific to retailers, developers and industrial/office users) 9. Customized research for particular companies that the City of Lake Elsinore is targeting for location, expansion and/or relocation. 10. Presentations to business prospects (retail, commercial and industrial) in support of efforts to attract additional investment into the community. 11. Economic, employment and/or fiscal impact analysis of proposed development projects in an effort to properly provide information to the residents, businesses, council members and staff within the City of Lake Elsinore. 12. Provide Pre -annexation fiscal impact analysis on behalf of the City of Lake Elsinore (as directed by the City Manager and/or his/her designee). 13. Preparation for and represent of City of Lake Elsinore at industry trade -shows including the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) Las Vegas International and San Diego Western Regional Conference(s). 14. Generate customized market research for a variety of industries (in addition to retail, which is specified above). 15. Provide Economic Development Training to City of Lake Elsinore staff, business leaders, appointed and elected officials. 16. DMG, Inc. shall serve as a project coordinator, ombudsperson and liaison with funding sources at the County, State and Federal level as it pertains to helping achieve economic development objectives in the City of Lake Elsinore. Specifically, DMG Inc. shall submit the pre -application materials requested by the Department of Commerce in conjunction with the City in order to secure the $3,500,000 share at 50% match. The proposed agreement has a three (3) year term. City staff and DMG Economics believe that a long-term commitment is needed to foster a pipeline of projects. That said, the proposed Agreement allows for a 30 -day Notice of Termination that can be "triggered" by either party with or without cause. DMG ECONOMICS June 23, 2015 Page 4 Fiscal Impact The FY2015-16 Operating Budget approved on June 9, 2015 provides funding of $120,000 to provide the ecoiiumic development professional services for the fiscal year. The agreement also provides an opportunity to evaluate the scope of service for the following fiscal year before the next budget cycle is completed. Prepared by: Jason Simpson, Director of Administrative Services Grant Taylor, Director of Community Development Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments 1. Agreement for Professional Services between Development Management Group, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore (Economic Development Services) 2. Copy of DMG, Inc. Corporate Profile AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BEWEEN DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. AND THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of July 1, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and Development Management Group, Inc... ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires professional services for the economic development services as identified in Exhibit A. B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal incorporate hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. Page 1 C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed Three Hundred Sixty Thousand and ($120,000 annually for three years) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to ttie contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. 5. Reserved. 6. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least thirty ten 30 (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such Page 2 materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. This Section shall not apply to those documents listed under Copyright Protection in Exhibit A, as Development Management Group, Inc. desires to protect certain intellectual property (methodology and presentation). a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually Page 3 agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor-in-inleiesl. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 11. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 12. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter Page 4 into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 15. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 16. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days Page 5 prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. V. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Page 6 Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Page 7 If to Consultant: Michael Bracken, Managing Partner Development Management Group, Inc. The Economic Architects 41-625 Eclectic St., Suite D-2 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-8820 (office) (760) 346-8887 (fax) 18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 19. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 20. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 21. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 22, Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 23. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 24, Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 25. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 26. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services, and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 28. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 30. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ('Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 31. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties Page 9 when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Page 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Proposal "CONSULTANT" Development Management Group, Inc. Michael Bracken, Managing Partner Page 11 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL The purpose of this BCA is to detail services that Development Management Group, Inc. will provide "Full Economic Development Services" to your community. Compensation DMG, Inc. will provide a professional services timesheet and would reserve the right to bill for less than the retainer amount should the number of hours actually worked in a given month not justify the full retainer amount. The retainer amount shall be $10,000 per month. DMG, Inc. would provide proactive services meaning that we would engage to determine market opportunities and provide extensive follow-up. Proposed Term of Agreement: Development Management Group, Inc. is requesting the City of Lake Elsinore consider a three (3) year agreement beginning July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018. As you are aware economic development is an ongoing process which takes a level of planning, marketing, sales, follow-up and follow-through. Economic investment seeks certainty within the community including elected officials, appointed officials (namely the Planning Commission), community leadership and staff. A three-year commitment allows us to market a level of contract stability. Even under this type of arrangement both the City of Lake Elsinore and Development Management Group, Inc. shall maintain the ability to terminate a professional arrangement with thirty (30) days' notice. The City has the right to review the retainer amount after twelve months with the Consultant. Scope As we provide you this proposal, it is important to review our previous work on behalf of the City of Lake Elsinore. In April, 2014 The City of Lake Elsinore and Development Management Group, Inc. entered into the first of two "On -Call" Agreements in which we have worked on the following projects on behalf of your community: Served as a project ombudsman on the proposed Wal-Mart project. An EIR is underway and expected to be before the City Council before the end of 2015 for their consideration. 2. Represented the City at ICSC-Las Vegas introducing the City to over 30 retailers. Much of the follow-up was the responsibility of staff and the results are sometimes a year or two out. That said, we understand that Wyndham Hotels has a site under contract. To this extent, we have also completed market analysis specific to hotel users. 3. Generated a retail market opportunity analysis that has been widely distributed to retailers, brokers and developers. Exhibit A 12 1 P a g e 4. Utilized our internal resources to complete due diligence on potential business partners to the City of Lake Elsinore. 5. Represented Lake Elsinore at both ICSC-San Diego and Retail Live introducing the City to an additional 20+ retailers and brokers. The balance of this document is designed to review what professional services we propose to provide under a long-term arrangement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Development Management Group, Inc. Professional Responsibilities of DMG, Inc. 1. DMG, Inc. shall be responsible for the creation of a 5 -year Economic Development Strategic Plan to guide the City and community in regards to obtaining economic investment. Said process shall begin in July, 2015 with the goal to have a plan available for adoption by the City Council by the end of November, 2015. The Plan shall include workshops to generate public input from community members, leaders, elected and appointed officials, business owners/operators and formalized community groups. The Economic Development Strategic Plan shall contemplate retail, industrial, office, medical, tourism and film elements as well as addressing a jobs housing balance that communities throughout the Inland Empire struggle to achieve. The plan shall also include a full implementation schedule (which DMG, Inc. shall be responsible for the implementation of). 2. DMG, Inc. shall have professional and functional responsibility for the implementation of the Economic Development Strategic Plan during the period of the contract proposed. 3. During the time that the Plan is being generated, DMG, Inc. shall continue to serve as a project ombudsman for the proposed Wal-Mart. 4. DMG, Inc. shall continue to follow-up in regards to development and retail leads (generated at ICSC, Retail Live and organically within the City/community). 5. DMG, Inc. shall coordinate with the Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce to provide appropriate professional support to assist them with franchise recruitment. Said support may include general and specialized market studies, providing contacts and assisting with an understanding of project financing. 6. Demographic research for the City of Lake Elsinore and the surrounding market area. 7. Retail market opportunity analysis for the City of Lake Elsinore and the surrounding market area. 8. Produce an ongoing electronic marketing campaign (specific to retailers, developers and industrial/office users) Exhibit A 13 1 P a g e 9. Customized research for particular companies that the City of Lake Elsinore is targeting for location, expansion and/or relocation. 10. DMG, Inc. presentations to business prospects (retail, commercial and industrial) in support of efforts to attract additional investment into the community. 11. Economic, employment and/or fiscal impact analysis of proposed development projects in an effort to properly provide information to the residents, businesses, council members and staff within the City of Lake Elsinore. 12. Provide Pre -annexation fiscal impact analysis on behalf of the City of Lake Elsinore (as directed by the City Manager and/or his/her designee). 13. Preparation for and represent of City of Lake Elsinore at industry trade -shows including the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) Las Vegas International and San Diego Western Regional Conference(s). 14. Generate customized market research for a variety of industries (in addition to retail, which is specified above). 15. Project management and ombudsman services to the City of Lake Elsinore serving as a go-between and on-going communicator between the City and a developer/development project. 16. Provide Economic Development Training to City of Lake Elsinore staff, business leaders, appointed and elected officials. 17. DMG, Inc. shall serve as a project coordinator, ombudsperson and liaison with funding sources at the County, State and Federal level as it pertains to helping achieve economic development objectives in the City of Lake Elsinore. Specifically, DMG Inc. shall submit the pre -application materials requested by the Department of Commerce in conjunction with the City in order to secure the $3,500,000 share at 50% match. 18. Additional economic development and post -redevelopment related services as needed (and mutually agreed upon). Copyright Reservation DMG, Inc. has proprietary claims on three professional service products. These include a) Fiscal Impact Analysis, b) Economic/Job Impact Analysis c) EB -5 Economic & Job Creation Analysis. While DMG, Inc. may be asked to provide these services to the City of Lake Elsinore, it shall be understood that DMG, Inc. shall reserve the right to copyright work completed. Further, the City of Lake Elsinore shall be granted unlimited use of said reports in their final form. Note that the copyright provision is to protect the intellectual property (form, style, function) of DMG, Inc.'s work rather than to limit the dissemination of the work. Note: EB -5 Analysis may be generated for projects within the City of Lake Elsinore but the contracting entity would be an EB -5 investor and/or a regional center and a separate contract would be executed with them for said services. In the event that DMG, Inc. is Exhibit A 14 1 P a g e asked to perform such services, the City of Lake Elsinore shall be notified in writing and have the ability to either authorize or reject said work prior to execution of a contract. Insurance Development Management Group, Inc. shall have a Certificate of Liability Insurance (ACORD) with the City of Lake Elsinore named as additional insured prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement. DMG, Inc. respectfully requests that the City of Lake Elsinore accept the following insurance limits as satisfactory based on the professional services being provided. Professional Error & Omission Issued by: Continental Casualty Insurance Company / Policy Number: 4025311802: $1,000,000 Commercial General Liability Issued by: The Hartford / Policy number 72 SBA AF4707 Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury: $2,000,000 Medical Expense (any one person): $10,000 Damages to Premises Rented to DMG, Inc.: $300,000 Aggregate Limits Products -Completed Operations: $4,000,000 General Aggregate: $4,000,000 Umbrella Liability: $1,000,000 (each occurrence & aggregate) ($10,000 retention) Automotive and Automobile Liability Issued by: Infinity Select Insurance / Policy number 50-4610033137001 Combined Single Limit (each accident): $1,000,000 Hold Harmless Development Management Group, Inc. shall hold the City of Lake Elsinore harmless regarding any claims resulting from personal injury or automobile accidents. Termination In the event that the Consultant does not perform the work in this Agreement or becomes unable to perform such work, the City of Lake Elsinore shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days written notice. At such time, Consultant shall have the right to submit an invoice for work performed to date along with the actual work performed to the City of Lake Elsinore. The City of Lake Elsinore shall have thirty (30) days for which to make payment to Consultant for all work performed prior to termination. DMG, Inc. shall also reserve the right to terminate the provision of professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore with a thirty (30) day notice. In such case as either the City of Lake Elsinore or DMG, Inc. terminates services under this Agreement (or at the end of the contract), DMG, Inc. shall be responsible for providing Exhibit A 15 1 P a g e a final "Project Status Report" and an electronic version of all files pertaining to economic development work in the City of Lake Elsinore Disclosed Ownership/Directorship in Publicly Traded Company Michael Bracken as the Managing Partner of Development Management Group, Inr is individually involved as a Founder and Director of Community Valley Bank based in EI Centro, CA. His ownership (inclusive of shares held (directly, and in trust) as well as options does not exceed 5% of the total outstanding ownership of the bank. The company trades under Stock Symbol CMUV. Under an abundance of caution, Michael Bracken shall not vote on any loans that may be considered by the bank in the City of Lake Elsinore. It is disclosed that as a Director, Mr. Bracken does receive compensation but said compensation is NOT based on referrals nor a percentage of any particular customer or loan transaction. Exclusivity Under this proposed retainer agreement, DMG, Inc. would agree to NOT represent any other community within the market area of Lake Elsinore. This shall include Corona, Wildomar, Temecula, Murrieta and Menifee nor any project in that general area within the County of Riverside. Working Arranaement DMG, Inc. will generally work remotely (in our offices in Palm Desert, CA or Encinitas, CA) in an effort to be cost efficient. DMG, Inc. has significant experience in working in a remote environment utilizing conference calling, electronic mail, document storage and transfer services and communication software (such as Skype). To the extent that travel to the City of Lake Elsinore is needed (or to the business location of a particular potential business investor): DMG, Inc. will bill the City of Lake Elsinore for a professional service rate equal to one-half (1/2) of the contracted rate for each hour of travel plus appropriate mileage (as stated within the Internal Revenue Service regulations, currently 55.5 cents per mile). Note: Under the retainer arrangement, DMG, Inc. shall absorb costs associated with the first 500 miles per month of travel. DMG, Inc. shall be responsible for ancillary costs associated with certain office supply type materials in preparation for various projects (not inclusive of commercial -type designs or commercial scale/quality printing). DMG, Inc. shall have the ability to request reimbursement for extraordinary or unusual expenses. Such requests shall be made in advance of the expense and shall be within the established policy, protocol or guidelines of the City of Lake Elsinore. Exhibit A 16 1 P a g e All payments to Consultant shall be paid by the City of Lake Elsinore within thirty (30) days of submittal of an invoice and a signed United States Internal Revenue Service W-9. Certaintv of Fee Arranqement and Contract Limit DMG, Inc. shall commit to the proposed fee arrangement being in place until June 30, 2018 (end of the 2017-18 Fiscal Year) in an effort to provide the City of Lake Elsinore a stable professional services rate. The rate will be reviewed at least annually at the discretion of the City. Conflict Procedures & Disclosures DMG, Inc. is a highly experienced economic development consulting firm and does have both active and inactive clients throughout Southern California. Within the Inland Empire specifically, we have active contracts with Manheim Investments (their nearest facilities are in Riverside and Fontana) and Elmore Sports Management (the operators of the Inland Empire 66'ers California League Professional Baseball Franchise) and the City of Colton. In the event that there is a potential conflict whereby a particular community DMG, Inc. is working on behalf of and a specific business client (that is negotiating or comparing multiple communities represented by DMG, Inc.), DMG, Inc. shall offer to represent the first community that identified that particular client to DMG, Inc. Exhibit A 17 1 P a g e Development Management Group, Inc. economic development ■ fiscal & economic impact analysis ■ development management � F t Overview of Business Activities Development Management Group, Incorporated specializes in services related to P.ronnmir analysis, forecasting, site selection, development management, market/development feasibility, EB -5 Visa employment analysis, financing and economic development activities. Foundation of Experience and Results The company founder, Michael Bracken brings over 20 years of local, regional and state government experience in the fields of economic development, redevelopment, housing and sales and use tax administration. Bracken holds a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration and a Master's Degree in Public Administration from The California State University San Bernardino (CSUSB). He co -designed CSUSB's Master's level course titled Management of Local Economic Development, which trains economic development professionals in business recruitment and effective use of financial and tax incentives. Bracken is a co-founder and serves on the Board of Directors of Community Valley Bank, a publically traded financial institution headquartered in Southern California. Additionally, Bracken currently serves as a member of the California State University San Bernardino -Board of Governors, Desert Sands Unified School District Facilities Development Board and Bracken is a former member of the Riverside County Workforce Development Board and The Living Desert Board of Directors. Finally, Bracken has been recognized with numerous awards over his career including from the California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED), The Inland Empire Business Journal, The Desert Sun and in 2007 was recognized as the California State University Alumni Advocate of the Year by the President of California State University San Bernardino and the Chancellor of The California State University. List of Market Analysis Projects (Direct and Commissioned Reports)• Big 5 Sporting Goods Chipotle City Wok Restaurants Costco Corporation Ford Motor Company Kia Motors Starbucks Toyota Motor Corporation (both United States and Mexico) 41-625 Eclectic Street, Suite D-2 ® Palm Desert, CA 92260 Office: (760) 346-8820 ■ Mobile: (760) 272-9136 ■ Fax: (760) 346-8887 ■ michael@dmgeconomics.com ■ www.dmgeconomics.com Development Management Group, Inc. Corporate Profile Page 2 of 2 Our Client List for Economic, Job & Fiscal Impact Analysis (Including EB -5): AEG Live/Goldenvoice, LLC Cilion, Inc., (Ethanol Production Facility) City of Imperial, California (Pre -Annexation) County of Imperial (Renewable Energy Generation & Prison/Detention Facilities) Denley Development & Management (New Construction Development -Los Angeles) Edison Mission Energy, an Edison International Company (Solar Energy Development) Elmore Sports Group, Limited (Owner/Operator Baseball & Hockey Franchises) Imperial Valley College (Economic Impact of College Campus) Keystone Planning Area (County of Imperial / City of Imperial) Liberty Energy, Imperial County & Kern County (Biomass Energy Production) Manheim Investments, Inc. -Riverside, Fontana and Anaheim, California (Wholesale Auto Auctions) Natural Econometrics, Incorporated 5anitations District of Los Angeles County Mesquite Regional Landfill Tenaska Energy (Solar Energy Production) Wesley Oliphant (Tuscany Heights, LLC) (Expert Testimony -United States Bankruptcy Court) Our Client List for Development/Site Selection Projects Include: Guy Evans, Incorporated Sepulveda Building Materials, Inc. The A.C. Houston Lumber Company 10 West Motorsports, Inc. Tandem West Glass, Inc. California Plastering, Inc. The California State University Tandem West Group, Incorporated Ferguson Plumbing, Inc, (a Wolseley Company) County of Imperial, California Hathaway & Sons Building Materials Chapman Enterprises, Inc. County of Riverside, California Edison Mission Energy Liberty Energy Resources, Inc. Enjoy Development Our Client List for Public and Public/Private Partnership Projects Include: California State University San Bernardino Palm Desert Campus: School of Communication Market Analysis City of Colton CA: Economic Development and Fiscal Impact Consulting Services City of Desert Hot Springs, CA: Economic Development Strategic Plan & Implementation City of Imperial, CA: Economic Development Business Recruitment & Ombudsman Services City of Lake Elsinore: Economic Development Business Recruitment & Ombudsman Services City of Needles, CA: Economic Development Business Recruitment & Ombudsman Services County of Imperial, CA: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategic Plan County of Imperial, CA: Three -Year Implementation Plan County of Riverside, CA Countywide and Sulo -regional Economic Development Strategic Plans Imperial Valley Economic Development Corporation: Marketing Plan & Internal Communications Plan / Lead Protocol/Investor Recruitment Program Executive & Professional Employee Performance Program San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation/National University Southern California Association of Governments Economic Growth Strategy Panel of Experts (San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial & Kern Counties) Economic Forecasting Projects c nti��tillkli�I: Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 15) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-654 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 6/18/2015 I'I'Y Oi b LA L LSIN0P L DRLANI F,)(l_RLfvit REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform and Resolution No. 2015 - Adopting City Council Policy No 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform. 2. Approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 400-13 "LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES" Background The Legislative Platform and Legislative Program are presented to the City Council for consideration at the request of Mayor Manos. Discussion The attached City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform is a compilation of general policy statements and City -specific policy statements developed by a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities and National League of Cities, input from the City Council and staff (including reference to City legislative positions in the past), research of current law and pending legislation, and discussions with local legislative staff. The general policy statements reflect commonly -accepted positions on matters pertaining to local control and governance of cities in the State of California. The City - specific policy statements address issues unique to the City of Lake Elsinore and/or western Riverside County. All policy statements in the Legislative Platform are consistent with the policies outlined in the City's General Plan, Parks & Recreation Master Plan, City Council Policies and legislative positions previously taken by the City Council. The Legislative Platform will be updated from time to time by the City Council as necessary to reflect legislative changes and/or changes in City Council policies and priorities. Legislative Platform and Legislative Program June 23, 2015 Page 2 The Legislative Program provides policies and procedures to coordinate and advance the Legislative Platform by outlining a detailed and streamlined process through which the City Council, staff and the City's legislative advocates can act in a timely manner in response to legislative proposals. The Legislative Program is set forth in a new proposed City Council Policy No. 400-13 (Exhibit A to the attached Resolution). Prepared By: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved By: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: Legislative Platform Resolution No. 2015-_ A Resolution of The City Council of The City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy And Procedures" Proposed Policy 400-13 RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 400- 13 "LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore is charged with the responsibility of establishing the laws of the City of Lake Elsinore through the enactment of ordinances, resolutions and official policies, and WHEREAS, City Council Policies are an expression of City Council's opinion as to the conduct of City business enacted to guide the various functions of the City and, where necessary, to establish procedures by which functions are performed in a fair and consistent manner, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform consisting of guiding principles and general and specific policy statements on priority issues and legislative/regulatory matters that may impact the City at the state and federal level with the primary purpose of protecting and promoting the City's interests and enhancing its ability to govern and provide essential municipal and community services; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Platform was developed by a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities and National League of Cities, input from the City Council and staff (including reference to City legislative positions in the past), research of current law and pending legislation, and discussions with local legislative staff and the City's legislative advocates and will be updated from time to time by the City Council as necessary to reflect legislative changes and/or changes in City Council policies and priorities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a Legislative Program with policies and procedures to coordinate and advance the City's Legislative Platform as may be amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Program will be the City's official policy to guide City staff and legislative advocates to address legislative and regulatory issues in a timely and directed manner, without precluding City Council consideration of additional legislative matters. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby adopts City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" (ExhibitA) as the City of Lake Elsinore official policy to guide City staff and legislative advocates in the coordination and advancement of the City's Legislative Platform. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 3 SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2V day of June, 2015. ATTEST: Virginia Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 3 EXHIBIT A CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 400-3 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2015 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM The Legislative Platform is a tool to protect and promote the City's interests on priority issues and legislative/regulatory matters that may impact the City at the state and federal level. The guiding principles and policy statements below allow City staff and legislative advocates to address legislative and regulatory issues in a timely and directed manner, without precluding City Cminnil consideration of additional legislative matters arising throughout the year. This platform supplements existing City Council established goals and policies in various documents including the City's General Plan. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Preservation of Local Control Support measures that preserve and protect the City's general law powers and duties to enact legislation and policy direction concerning local affairs. Oppose measures that preempt local authority. Promotion of Fiscal Stability Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, and financial independence. Support measures that preserve and promote the City's revenue base. Oppose measures that mandate costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefit. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the county, state or federal government, without offsetting benefit. III. Support Funding Opportunities Support measures that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding including competitive grants and other funding programs. Support measures that promote dedicated funding streams at the regional, state and federal levels allowing the City to maximize local revenues, offset and leverage capital expenditures, and maintain City goals and standards. POLICY STATEMENTS GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES General Area of Review: Elections, Ralph M. Brown Act, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act, conflict of interest, insurance, tort reform and open and transparent government. General Policy Statements: Supports legislation that recognizes the need to conduct the public's business in public. Support legislation to allow alternative methods of meeting public notice requirements and enhancing them through the use of cost effective and innovative, technology friendly methods of communication. Support legislation to improve and streamline the Political Reform Act and its implementation through regulations. • Support legislation that would allow a city presented with an allegation of a violation of the California Voter Rights Act (CVRA) to address the allegation before any person may file a lawsuit related to the alleged violation. • Support legislation to reduce unnecessary and costly procedures for conducting a municipal election. • Oppose legislation that mandates costly and unnecessary procedures related to the election process. • Support legislation providing city councils more flexibility to fill city council vacancies including extending the appointment period to fill a vacancy. • Support legislation to allow cities to conduct mail ballot elections when appropriate to reduce the cost of elections and increase voter turnout. • Support legislation that limits the exposure of local governments to lawsuits related to liability, including unimproved natural conditions and design immunity. COMMUNITY SERVICES General Area of Review: Parks, recreation, libraries, cultural arts, youth, community and human services programs. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding for the development and preservation of open space consistent with the City's General Plan, Parks & Recreation Master Plan, and other related policies. • Support legislation and funding for the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of public facilities, parks and open space. • Support legislation and funding for overall youth programs. • Support legislation and funding for policies and programs that promote the overall health and wellness of families, veterans, seniors and youth in the City. • Support legislation and funding for youth -related prevention and intervention programs, including after school educational and recreational programs. EMPLOYEE RELATIONS General Area of Review: Labor relations, employee relations and other matters related to human resources. General Policy Statements: Support legislation that increases local control and limits additional financial burdens related to employee relations and collective bargaining that can be appropriately negotiated at the bargaining table. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY General Area of Review: Air, water and water quality, climate change, CEQA, integrated waste management, hazardous materials, coastal issues, and utilities. General Policy Statements: • Support IPgislatinn and funding to create a sustainable and stable water supply, encourage conservation of water resources and reduce urban runoff pollution. • Support legislation and funding for renewable energy and advanced technologies that reduce energy use while providing a public benefit that is greater than the cost of compliance. • Support legislation and funding for local government energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. • Support legislation and funding for recyclable materials markets while maintaining local authority and flexibility to regulate solid waste and recyclables. HOUSING COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT General Area of Review: Land use, development, annexation and incorporation, building standards, economic development, redevelopment and enterprise zones, mobile home and sign regulations. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding to strengthen the capability of local agencies to prepare, adopt and implement plans for responsible growth, development, zoning, and annexations. • Support legislation and funding for the adoption of effective state building codes to promote community building safety and mitigation of natural hazards. • Support legislation and funding for the adoption of effective and clear green building standards in the California Building Code while providing a public benefit that is greater than the cost of compliance. • Support legislation and funding programs that promotes the development and enhancement of safe, affordable, and accessible housing within the City for all economic segments of the population. • Support legislation and funding for improvements to housing element law to provide clear processes and flexibility to allow regional cooperation and establish realistic housing goals and performance standards. • Support legislation that promotes the fair and effective distribution of State infrastructure bond funds consistent with the needs of diverse local cities. • Support funding mechanisms that encourage and facilitate infrastructure development and economic development. • Support legislation that streamlines the redevelopment dissolution process with consistency and equitability. • Support legislation to retain existing fees on telecommunications services and for public, educational and governmental channels. • Oppose legislation to restrict the authority of cities to zone and plan for the deployment of telecommunications infrastructure. • Support legislation that promotes the ability of cities to maintain and manage the public right-of-way and receive compensation for its use. PUBLIC SAFETY General Area of Review: Law enforcement, fire and life safety, emergency communications, emergency services, disaster preparedness, Indian gaming, and nuisance abatement. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation to provide a greater share of and increased latitude to spend asset forfeiture funds. • Support legislation to improve local law enforcement, fire suppression and prevention, hazardous materials mitigation, rescue, emergency medical services, and disaster preparedness. • Support legislation to reimburse the City for overtime costs paid to public safety personnel who are required to appear in State and/or County courts. • Support legislation to grant state and federal funding to supplement local law enforcement to increase staffing, equipment and capital improvements to maintain public safety. • Support legislation and funding to provide law enforcement/public safety agencies greater access to wireless communication necessary to support a national wireless broadband network capable of use by any public safety entity to serve and protect communities throughout the nation. • Support legislation and funding that promotes comprehensive and effective drug and alcohol education and rehabilitation programs. • Support legislation and funding to assist local law enforcement to reduce crimes related to illicit drugs, burglary, and assault, including domestic violence, and sobriety and driver's license checkpoints. • Support legislation to prohibit the manufacture, import, sale and use of dangerous synthetic substances that mimic marijuana, methamphetamine and heroin. • Support legislation that prevents juvenile access to alcohol and illegal drugs. • Support legislation to deter drivers from operating motor vehicles while under the influence of alcohol and drugs. • Oppose legislation to expand "early release" for low-risk serious and violent offenders without an increase in sustained funding to ensure responsible supervision by parole agents and for local agencies that provide post -release supervision. • Support legislation that provides frontline funding for police services associated with the "early release" of state prisoners as a result of state -mandated criminal justice realignment provisions. • Support legislation and funding to strengthen and enforce legal protections for all individuals who are victims of crime, including minors and victims of family violence and sexual assault. 0 • Support legislation to maintain or increase funding for shelters, victim advocacy, trauma and crisis counseling and related mental health services, to assist victims of violent crime, especially minors and victims of family violence and sexual assault. • Support legislation and funding to coordinate homeland security programs, training and emergency response efforts among federal, state, and local governments with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. • Support legislation and funding for Urban Area Security Initiative ("UASI") and other funding initiatives administered by the Department of Homeland Security to enhance the City's ability to respond to regional or national threats. • Support legislation and funding to secure adequate frequencies and communications systems for multi -jurisdictional connectivity for public safety and protect the frequencies from intrusion. • Support legislation to increase Emergency Management Performance grant funding retaining flexibility in use of funds for emergency preparedness training, disaster events and disaster communication efforts. • Support legislation and funding to treat and assist the needs of at -risk juvenile offenders and juveniles placed on court-ordered formal probation. • Support legislation and funding for programs that protect youth from tobacco, alcohol and drug use, and related prevention and intervention programs including gang prevention and after-school programs. REVENUE AND TAXATION General Area of Review: Finance administration, taxation reform, general and special revenue and revenue sources at the federal, state and local levels. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding for the preservation and enhancement of the City's ability to generate and retain sales and use tax revenue, and local point-of-sale revenue allocations. • Oppose legislation to reduce or remove tax-exempt status of municipal bonds. • Oppose legislation to alter the manner by which transient occupancy taxes are calculated and collected to the City's detriment. • Support legislation and funding that preserves and enhances a positive business climate and maintains and grows the business tax base. TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS General Area of Review: Transportation, construction, telecommunications and general public works related areas. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation to ensure the City receives its fair share of transportation revenue and increase funding for local transportation and transit programs and projects. • Support legislation to protect dedicated transportation -related tax revenues and enhance the ability of local agencies to finance local transportation programs and facilities, including the gas tax and bond funds. • Support legislation that gives priority to self-help and "super" self-help counties when allocating bond funding and other transportation funding mechanisms. • Support legislation to improve access and funding to public transportation. • Support legislation and funding mechanisms that support and encourage the use of transit and non -motorized transportation. • Support legislation that enhances the safety of city streets and arterials for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. • Support legislation that will reduce traffic congestion and support regional transportation programs. • Support legislation and funding opportunities for upgrades and/or separations for at - grade crossings. • Support legislation that increases local flexibility in the allocation of transportation capital funds. • Support legislation that encourages the use of design -build methods to facilitate a faster, stream -lined approach to project delivery. • Oppose legislation to eliminate or restrict the use of Riverside County State Improvement Transportation Funds, federal transportation funding, Measure A, or Gas Tax funding for local transportation projects CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SUBJECT: Legislative Program Policy No. 400-13 Policy and Procedures Effective Date: 6/23/2015 Page No. I of 2 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish a Legislative Program to advance the City's Legislative Platform by outlining a detailed and streamlined process through which the City Council, staff and the City's legislative advocates can act in a timely manner in response to legislative proposals and enhance the City's ability to govern and provide essential municipal and community services. BACKGROUND The Legislative Platform ("Platform") is a compilation of general policy statements and City - specific policy statements adopted by the City Council to identify specific priority areas of interest for the City and region that would benefit the community. The Platform is developed by a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities and National League of Cities, input from the City Council and staff (including reference to City legislative positions in the past), research of current law and pending legislation, and discussions with local legislative staff. The Platform may be updated from time to time by the City Council as necessary to refect legislative changes and/or changes in City Council policies and priorities. POLICY Federal and state legislation consistent with the Platform may be supported by the City. Legislation inconsistent with the Platform may be opposed by the City. Positions taken by the City in addition to "Support "or "oppose" may include "Support if Amended" and `Oppose Unless Amended". The City may also provide a letter of concern or interest without taking a formal position on a piece of legislation. Initial requests to take positions on legislative matters will be reviewed and approved by the City Manager. Approved requests that are consistent with the City's Platform will be coordinated for the Mayor's [or designee] approval and signature. Requests that are inconsistent or silent in the City's Platform may be placed on an agenda for consideration by the City Council. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SUBJECT: Legislative Program Policy and Procedures Policy No. 400-13 Effective Date: 6/23/2015 Page No. 2 of 2 In addition to coordinating formal action through the City Council, staff will administer the City's Legislative Program by generally performing the following functions: a. Work with Department Directors and staff to identify matters of legislative importance and develop positions on Federal and state legislative proposals and general matters of legislative interest. b. Communicate matters of legislative importance to the City Council through periodic updates, and identify and coordinate positions for formal action by the City Council. G. Review positions and analysis prepared by the League of California Cities, National League of Cities, legislative advocates, and local government/professional associations in formulating positions. d. Monitor and track key bills through the legislative process utilizing tine City's advocacy services, legislative websites, and government/professional associations. C. Counnurnicate the City's positions to federal, state, and county legislators. f Participate as needed in the drafting and amending of legislative proposals that significantly impact the City. g. Work with the League of California Cities, National League of Cities, legislative advocates, other cities and local governnnent/professional associations on legislative matters of mutual concern. h. Participate and attend legislative briefings and meetings to actively engage and stay apprised of legislative trends and upconning legislation. HISTORY Adopted by Resolution No. 2015- 6/23/2015 Agenda Date: 6/23/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 16) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: TMP -938 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report 4 Printed on 6118/2015 City o Lake Elsinore Page 7 E M 0 F - cu E z j m 2 w iz z I F- 0 (1 D 0 E CL w UJ Lij LO z c) z w w a. \�-��----...� F- 0 >- LL F- 0 -j F- _ 'J: 0 (5) LU 0� U) LU > Lu 0 0 (L Mw -j co F- < C) C'4 w W a C,� CN Z D 0 z z 0 z LL, z Z: 00 z CD 0 w \ tr)\ � F- LL. 0 3 E M cu E P) m iz I I U) E < \�-��----...� _ z CD 0 co (D \ tr)\ 0 NCl 0 o Q) Z ) wo ƒ\\/\ 0— »®/°\}\/ 0 10 2 )\))=J< V0 »0©\\2;) 0 M \\\\� \�\�(\/( (< z EN 0 w m Ch W \ } ± w 0i z W LO Z N w >- a < IL 0 -j LU > Lu 0 (L LO LLI LO N LL 0 -j :F z Lu LIJ z 0 00 E < 04 > Cc M = 0 co co m E M z LO E > M Co = 0 0 E Z .j E 'o M 0 N > - - ------ ----- - E a Ni (D Z E, Gm 7� C) ZO < Z E (D (D -2 0 — 0 c o Y O.E- �i a) co cr c p OE 00 cn CD (0 00( i� U) 0 0 cm E 0 N (D'a E V M E m 2 E E N < w M m -am - OD tn U) < E 0 5 0 a 0 m 0 U- -2 m C) 0 a 0 < E w 0 0 C) 0 0 < >1 M 0 M a Y CL a: -j06 ld: N I a j E oa C'4 roi m >1 M m c m n Z LO E < (u Lo m 0 ro Z co N 0"O ro 'co 0. W Q) c) c 'r- 0 T75 > 0 a) a) LLJ,P 0 W o 0) 0-0 m C; T a) .- r. 0 o z a) Z 0 � 0) 0 N0 w 0 E CL C) aj C2 1 0 0 C < E C) V) I a) C OE<2 , 1-4 m = a,.c n 0,9 < u) EE 0 0 c < = 0 CL m 4 L6T 0 0 m Z If m (L a) m O m cc 0 0- 0 m > 0 r 0 C 0 w O C O4- a 0- (1) 0< LO Q D- mU Z dU < Z M � m Lo 0 (D (D > 0 m w co m N LD (D m (N cl Z 4i LO 0 0 In LD LmQ M C) a 04 m oz� > N 0 m c >1 nm Zi E L Om 0] Nw m w M O 0 C4 > N Lo C', Z 2 0 ,W, a) =C 0 c) L6 '0 -0 > lrn 0 1 IIiI R Z 0 ,off 0 a > ¢1 Z 10 Lu 2 C 0 LU cn 0 - 0 '0 a) �o 1 - - ----- -- - ------ 0 - M CIO z E M - 0 Lu Q 0), I < LU E Crop > > - < > E 0 E M.0 T-) 0 0 0 w) 0 L5 M L, Fn 2� E C o -0 o 05 u C) 0 -F , Q u D 0 E (D 0 � LL w 6 0 � m �a - 0 .2 1. > 0- COL 0 z P C z z 70 0 0 0 (1) aj z 0 < w LU — 0 n LU w LU w 0 uj Z 0 z m m m LU FL C 0 0 w > 0 U 0 m 0 w wi m m U- LL a- �w I C�, Z % y ea e / / < ± / y / / } / § \ § \ ) \ ° ® z z > 3 ) LO / ƒ / § / § C) \ \ < \ [ 6 / / \ o K/ oƒ} j 9/ j) \ \LU ix n j \ } < \ / / \ } \ U) e z a 5 o e e z e m \ z =j \ G \ / [ / S §^ / / z a m \ { \ / } \ z / } § § \ G e © { = G \ ( \ ° ~ \ \ / < / ° / g 5 e < _ { / } o e \_® m@ 0 3 m m / \ } / / \ / r-- \ \ \ \ \ i \ \ ° z Lr) j c)\ .8 uj e g A ® a_ o o E LU } z \ < - 5 \ \ / \ \ .e ° c Cl) m 5 ® m w f\= § m / z G« u i a).� �w § ) } / p § ® 0 m \ e r of o z / < ® % \ \ { ~ ® © ° § ± ® 5 o G ° © / < e < } < f a » u « o % a ._ ®° m o c u \ J x o 2 e« S/ \ / \ } ( J / \ / / �k / < / \ \ < gy m= z< e o= z> e« e=> COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Grant Yates, City Manager FROM: Johnathan O. Skinner, Community Services Director DATE: June 16, 2015 SUBJECT: Community Services Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Vicky Saavedra, Community Services Office Specialist Il, RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file, BACKGROUND: The following provides a summary of the Community Services Department's programs, activities and events for May 2015. VOLUNTEERS We are currently recruiting clerical volunteers for the following departments; Public Works, Engineering, Human Resources and Community Services. The Community Services Department utilized a total of 8 volunteers for the Pet Walk, which was held on Saturday, May 91". The current total of volunteer applications submitted this year is 35, which include 8 adults and 27 youths. COMMUNITY CENTER The Community Services Department, specifically Recreation Classes saw consistent and increased participation in May for all classes. May brings us to the two month mark for the new online registration and reservation system, REC1. The program has continues to work very well and meet the needs of our department. It has made online registrations and reservations easier and free. Since April we have seen steady growth in the number of online transactions; online registrations and reservations. Website registrations account for 25% of all transactions. The department welcomes a great mix of returning lifeguards and new hires for the summer aquatic program, We completed training on May 30" in anticipation for a June start. The Lake Elsinore Hispanic Community or the " Hispanica Communidad de Lake Elsinore" celebrated the Senate Bill to allow undocumented residents to obtain a driver's license on May 30t" at the Community Center with 200 people in attendance. SENIOR CENTER The nutrition program continued providing breakfast to take home for each lunch participant. Seniors are thrilled and the attendance continues to increase. On May 8tt, a total of 13 seniors enjoyed their lunch as they attended a trip to Benedict Castle in Riverside. They enjoyed a tour of the California Cultural Heritage Landmark. The second trip to the Graber Olive House in Ontario on May 1811' was enjoyed by 12 seniors. They enjoyed a guided tour, a sack lunch and visited the museum and gift shops. The Riverside County Health Department did their annual inspection on May 18th. Once again we received an "A" rating. Prime Care offered a free Lung Function Screening on May 19111, which 26 seniors took advantage of. The American Lung Association had 20 seniors attend their workshop, which provided information on respiratory conditions and provided many resources to assist those who suffer from any if those conditions. The Grossman Burn Center and the Grossman Burn Foundation provided a very helpful presentation on May 201". Attendees left with great resources and gifts to help prevent from getting burned. The seniors went on a trip to Harrah's Casino on May 28th. The trip was a success with 42 participants. The trip included $10 of free play for each participant. Three "Movies Days" were offered to the seniors on May V, 6til and 29th. They enjoyed free popcorn and drinks while watching; "Must Love Dogs", We Bought a Zoo" and "The Skeleton Key." Services provided this month included Notary, Mobile Fresh, Legal Advice, RTA Bus Pass Sales, bread distribution, haircuts, Blood Pressure Clinic and Health Insurance Counseling. SPECIAL EVENTS The Community Services Department hosted their 41l' annual Pet Walk event on May 9th. It was held in Parking Lot B/Levee of the Diamond Stadium with 300 people in attendance. The event consisted of a mile and half and 14 pet related vendors such as George's Pet Sitting, Lake Elsinore Animal Hospital and Animal Friends of Valley. The first 150 participants received a Pet Walk Bandana that featured our new pet logo. On the walk, participants were able to collect raffle tickets for the drawing held at the end of the event. With over 20 sponsors, staff was able to raffle off great prizes. On May 17t11, the Eibach Honda Car Meet returned for their V year at the Diamond Stadium. This event continues to grow each year with 8,000 people in attendance. People from all over the Inland Empire meet yearly and show off their unique car's. This event features music, food and merchandise vendor as well as a beer and garden. Lucas Oil returned for their 2 A national race for the series at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park on May 29t" and 30111. There was over 5,000 spectators that were able to enjoy competitive races, a variety of food vendors, PIT access and merchandise booths. SKATE PARK The total attendance at the Ni Skate Park for the month of May was 501. The skate park had a total of 5 rentals and 30 new waivers forms filled out. The McVicker skaters are excited about the new Serenity Skate Park opening this summer. Skate 147 Scooter 217 BMX 137 LA LACUNA In March 2015, City Council approved termination of the Agreement with Pyramid Enterprise, Inc. for the operations of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. Staff began conversations with William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental for Campground Operation. Campground transition will take place on Julie V. An interim agreement for operations was approved by City Council in May, with a detailed Agreement to the Council in June. Staff continues to work through the transition with Pyramid Enterprise. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 24, 2015 SUBJECT: MONTHLY PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY JUNE 2015 Public Works Street Maintenance Maw June Pot Hole Repairs268 _......... 163 _..-.___.........._ __._.. Graffiti Removal 160 79 -- ___.._.-_....—.__.-..-..__ Storm Drains Cleaned 17 15 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 79 42 Signs Installed 2 1 Sign Repairs 46 37 Sidewalk Repairs (Square Ft) 1127 0 Curb & Gutter Repairs (Linear Ft) 0 0 Removed Illegal Signs 75 125 Area Sprayed With Herbicide (in acres) 0 12.5 Shopping Carts Pick -Ups 67 102 _............ ... .. Trimmed Trees Various Locations 32 3 Drain Inspections 1 15 ---...—........ Removal of Road Hazards 24 9 Heatwurx Repair Units 0 2400 Vehicle Maintenance Vehicle Repairs 10 14 Vehicle Service 5 8 Alignments 0 0 Tire Installation & Repairs 17 12 Small Equipment Repaiis 8 --_-- 5 _Service Calls -vice- Mufflers & Tailpipes Body Shop Repairs 17 0 0 12 0 0 Vehicle Maintenance Trailers Repaired 9 7 Batteries & Jump Starts 5 7 Boat Repairs 16 14 Heavy Equipment Repairs 14 16 Vehicle Maintenance Program Fleet 2000 0 0 Abatement _Weed Lots Cleaned 0 20 _ _ City Lots Cleaned 15 _ 12 Trees Trimmed 45 53 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 8 10 Replaced irrigation clocks -.__. 3 0_ _._. ... Shopping Carts Picked Up - 0 1 Checked all Landscaped areas for Major Issues ---..._..-._.. 0 ......... ......... .----- 2 Days -- Removed Illegal Signs 10 0 Facilities Division - Service Calls City Hall 29 16 P.W. Yard 28 4 Cultural Center 10 6 Community Center 8 7 Senior Center 11 18 Tiny Tots 1 0 Chamber Building 3 0 Station 85 1 1 Station 95 1 2 Station 97 4 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC COUNTER Research Requests 10 __ 2 Plan Checks 4 5 Final Maps 1 1 Grading 1 4 Street Improvement 7 0 - Developmeni Review -- --- 4 - 4 Flood Plain Determination 3 ........... 4 Bond Release Requests 3 6 Oversize Transportation Permits 3 9 Encroachments Permit Applications - 18 22 _ _....._.... ----._..... — — Encroachment Permit Traffic Issues --- 4 - - - 1 . ... ...... ... . . ..... CIP UPDATE Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location Senior Center Sidewalk Senior 100% plans 100% Complete Project completed June Improvements Center completed 2015. Landscape Project No. 4424 improvements are under separate contract with EVMVVD. Landscape improvements should begin sometime in October 2.015 cvp icker Dog Park McVicker Completed Project completed Project completed Fence Improvements Park November 2014 Project No. Z40000 alkepoint Park Electrical Lakepoint Completed Project completed - - - ------------ Project completed June Panel Park 2015 Project No.4414 Serenity Park- -—Skate Serenity Park 90% plans In progress Project under Zone complete construction Project No. 4419 Facilities Master Plan Citywide 85% Preparation of final Project underway, Data Project No. Z30000 complete report per contract collection completed. agreement Preparation of draft report under progress. Anticipated completion by July/August 2015 Parks Facilities - Master Citywide 85% Preparation of final Project underway. Data Plan Complete report per contract collection completed. Project No. 4106 agreement. GHD preparing final report for Parks Facilities Master Plan. Anticipated completion ------- - - - -[--- by July/August 2015 ------ GIP UPDATE Project —Master Protect Location Design Construction Project Status City Drainage Citywide In progress Proposed new district Plan Update boundaries under Project No, 120 review. Consultant meeting scheduled for June 22, 2015 Wer Fee Study Citywide In progress Fee study underway by Project No. Z30002 VVilldan Engineering. Cost allocation study completed. Anticipated completion March/April -6unn-e-r-s—onStre—et 2015 G-un-n-erson- --95% design- -Construction 100% Plan & Received Rehabilitation between completed anticipated for on 4/20/15. NEPA Project No. 4350 Lakeshore August 2015, environmental doc Drive and submitted to Caltrans for SR-74 review. Staff to submit RFA package to Caltrans for construction by 7/1/2015. RfVV certification to Caltrans - for review Collier Island Outlet 80%7�iristru ction Per Developer Modification Phase I completed anticipated for Agreement, construction Project No. 4388 April/May 2015 improvements will be done by outlet mall City Monument Signs Lake Elsinore 100% 100% Completed Project completed May Project No. 4396 completed 2015 -Th��(J­Stmjt Dra�niag`e-- --La-k—eE-Isin—ore -M% Prelim -- ---RFP for 100% --------P-S--E —sen-t Phase 1 under out, proposals due Project No. 4296 review - - - --------- 6/1612015, ..... .... . ..... CIP UPDATE ...... .. . . Project Project Location — Design -- - -- -- Construction .. . ........ Project Status -fr-�fficslgnal Installation t 100% 100% corn pleted Project completed Canyon Hills/Sage Road Canyon Hills I completed Project No. 4368 Traffic Signal Installation Riverside Developer driven project Grand Avenue at Drive (HWY Riverside 74) @ Grand Project No. 4392 Ave and Riverside Dr. (HWY 74) @ Lakeside H. S. Slurry Seal Project Various 100% 100% completed Project completed Project No. Z10014 streets November 2015 citywide -Pavement Management Citywide No design Construction Bid opening held on Program (Grind & plans anticipated for July 5/14/15. Staff received Overlay / R&R Phase 2) needed 2015 5 bids. Construction Project No. Z10008 contract awarded to Hardy & Harper. Construction Agreement is being executed - AnnualPavement vement Citywide Preparation Anticipated completion Management Plan — of report. in July 2015. Project No. 210005 No design 75% of the field survey needed is completed so far 1-1 5 -/Railroad Canyon 1-15 @ In progress PA&ED in progress. City Road Interchange Railroad Council Roundabout Improvements (PAED) Canyon Project progress update Project No. Z10016 Interchange conducted in March 2015. Anticipated PA&ED completion in December 2015 P UPDATE -( T Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location Railroad Canyon/1-15 1-15 @ 100% plans Construction Contract Southbound Off Ramp Railroad completed awarded to Highland Deceleration Lane Canyon Construction, Inc. Project No. 4432 Interchange Project to begin sometime in July/August ' 2015 Main Street Interchange Being added to the Project No. Z10017 TUMF Network, being placed on the upcoming CIP to perform PSR, Needs to be improved by 2024. City to perform feasibility analysis of Main St. new interchange and Camino Del Norte -- -- --- _._.-... Lake Inlet- i Channel Lake inlet Survey--- conducted channel 5/27/2015; results due northwesterly week of 6/8/2015. from the Documentation for terminus of environmental San Jacinto permitting submittals to River to be completed by Morton Street 6/26/2015 P. �. ....2'v'�\-n.L.'.rv....IS'..... ...... 'Y ........ ...::.. .. i v.'v M..t l.I..n...h k. ....t:.'.. �.e'...".Y.e.?{ 0.hlvva .ti.u.YEI)o-mak '. .✓^C..Y..'_: .... . f 4 t t t Q god0 U j Q O cll U 0 O G O Z f6 ' C O N J cc f ca lum �v 1 Hum i f �.✓ r d) O L 1.ro O (U A N N a) N -_ U c <o � SroJ E E E N ON L C L (pn ro U O @ O m N O o0 N 0 N a `cs .c L -C 0 N O M C C L U O O (D a N N ro N T U (V ro ~ O N C- u U O a) a O C roai L a ro 3 ro O. U ro C W ro C (B C (Cl O U�- N CD p £ - p 0 f1 O -iC+ 2 L > O 2r 'U OV N C N N p N �' = N C U N (D N (0 L> Q. ro C U Q ro N Y N O U A> ro O O 0. SU M O U U C C p N N m= 0 E D O N (D 0 Ci a o a _ v aN N :� L .� "' O O (Q A L >c N U c A 0 3 u (nO O U O m a d) N > c N m N N c �v rn U@ N j O ` O) 'C Q U 41 'C 0. N U f1 .0 L O O N O NU (p C U O ro c Q N N > U w U E W N m N O N> L O y O .O > > O .� ..L�-- y __. in >_ E ZS > L C> N C !6 C C C J in U U) N J U U y Y L J N r N U v o o U 3° ma Q N n ro U> U U fOn c (� m s O o t a) �t } } } 3 >- m } r o - Q. U) (Do O o o U ll p CD L O fY ° (1 L U K p r_ N LY a a a s S a- a ac o (V m u i LL L r U c H ul O u += Ln v •A Y• N N C � 0 O o a �r"I N � H f6 0 0 (0 Y ? (V m u i LL L r U c H ul O u += Ln v •A Y• N N C � 0 O o a �r"I N � IV f6 0 0 (0 Y ? N u sem+ !n ti v _ m �+ � A � N y (V m u i LL L r U c H ul O V u Ln a f0 N N C O o a QY � � N (0 Y ? N p ti 0 N •' L Ul E N v01i 4 c = tl u O u v (V m u i LL L r U c H ul O V Ln f0 N u ci N p ti 0 b„ b ii Q m •T� �fik 3 � "�` C i! ki i0.`h 4vf { { • �5 ! {; y` p! Mho ;`-h .;� 9 <Z .1 (V m u i LL L r U c H ul O V Ln f0 N u ci N p ti 0 (V m u i LL L r U c 11 W 0 N a - r N N O u c0 N W 0 O O W O J O N M 0 J' , n Q c € N 92 w w zJ w w u m C N b u C u C N El N E W 71, I a � v � O "> m o IL �. O1 C � ° a u V�C E 0 E a 0 u I o- s r d � v o U N i1 ry N_ N LL 17 r LL x 0 a m 0 r v' n N N n uJ rl 0 v w WI I O H LL I ' O W iY N N N C U N N U 2 � LL T5 p O U N N @ u z�oain�>y U .n 0 V Z ra U) a+ c W U c M U C O1 m L 10 U G G N N L_ T C O N C N O m n � ° d N 0 •i n � Y cu f « rn o `o L ° V O � ? f0 A 9 ° N L i o n 1 V 10 U G G N N L_ T C O N C N O 9 7 m M N zo 0 a N V O v m N W 0 N N N 0 C1 C U ! � 5 � �4 t V m = N OJ SIN N C a j iT Y (p N I I a+ V1 m I E j V y m d N I T I, C•t o - �- I' H m x �- IL Q W N O N V' 0 V' u N N W a c Q 0 �n N I Hop j ci j9 r I W. O I 7C o 411 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 GENERAL The proposed project (The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07) is a 20 -acre condominium project consisting of 163 single-family detached condominium residential units with six floor plans and three architectural styles, located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (APN 379-050-006 and 379-050-034). 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the subject project. 3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project's approval. PLANNING DIVISION SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2014-07 The Draft Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. A Final Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 6. Page 6-25 Community Walls Solid wall shall be modified to increase the landscape space to a minimum of 6'-0". 7. All future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document. Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 8. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will revert to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future developments within The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan are proposed. 9. The applicant/developer shall provide all project -related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document. 10. The applicant/developer shall implement those mitigation measures identified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 and Addendum #1 and the correlating Mitigation Monitoring Programs. 11. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 12. Any amendment to the Specific Plan, even though it may affect only one portion of the Specific Plan, shall be accompanied by a complete specific plan document which includes the entire specific plan, including both changed and unchanged parts. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 13, Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2014-07, shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.184.120. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two-year period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review application. 14. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b) (2) of Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square foot as assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 15. All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 16. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plan. 17. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 18. Future site plotting and construction within Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 shall comply with the standards and requirements of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. Future site plotting shall be shown on precise grading plans, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 19. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 20. Any revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 21. Materials and colors depicted on the approved Design Review Package dated February 2014 shall be used unless minor modifications are approved by the Community Development Director or designee or major modifications are approved by the Planning Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 Commission. 22. Trash storage areas shall be concealed from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 23. The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit. 24. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 26. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 27. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. 28. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 29. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 30. All mechanical and electrical equipment for all buildings shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. 31. All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation systems to provide 100 percent plant coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. Construction Landscape & Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 Irrigation drawings shall be prepared, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Cost Estimate for materials and labor shall also be submitted for review and approval. A Landscape Plan Check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee, Inspection, permit and administration fees. • The applicant shall replace any street trees harmed during construction, in conformance with the City's Street Tree List, at a maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 24 -inch box in size. • Perimeter walls shall be protected by shrubs and other plantings that discourage graffiti. • The applicant shall ensure a clear line of sight at ingress/egress points by providing plantings within 15 feet of ingress/egress points whose height does not exceed three feet and whose canopy does not fall below six feet. • The landscape plan shall provide for California native drought -tolerant ground cover, shrubs, and trees. Special attention shall be given to use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to prevent excessive watering. • No grass turf landscaping will be installed. • All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a ten percent (10%) Faithful Performance Bond of the approved estimated labor and materials cost for all planting. The bond shall remain in effect for one year from Certificate of Occupancy. • All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. • All Model Homes shall be Xeriscaped and signage provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping. Xeriscape is a method of landscape design that minimizes water use by: 1) Implementing hydrozones; Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 2) Minimizes high water -use plant material as identified by Water Use Classifications of Landscape Species (WUCOLS) (such as turf) and incorporates water -efficient ("drought -tolerant" / climate -appropriate) plants; 3) Requires an efficient irrigation system that includes: a. ET -Based ("Smart irrigation") controller(s) with weather -sensing, automatic shut-off and seasonal adjustment capabilities; b. Efficient irrigation water application through use of: i. Low-volume point -source irrigation (such as drip irrigation and bubblers) for all shrub planter areas (maximum of 3:1 slope) with a minimum irrigation efficiency of 0.90 ; and/or ii. Spray or rotor -type nozzles for areas a minimum of eight (8) feet wide, for slopes 3:1 and greater, AND with a minimum irrigation efficiency of 0.71. 4) Improvement of soil structure for better water retention; and 5) Application of mulch to hinder evaporation. The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. All landscaping and irrigation shall comply with the water -efficient landscaping requirements set forth in LEMC Chapter 19.08 (Water Efficient Landscape Requirements), as adopted and any amendments thereto. 32. The Final landscaping and irrigation plans shall include vine plantings and necessary irrigation methods along the outside of the project perimeter walls located along the entire length of the Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue frontages and along the entire length of the eastern property line. The specific number and location of the vine plantings shall be Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 33. Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception that wrought -iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. Interior fencing material shall only be vinyl. 34. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of twenty feet by twenty feet (20' x 20') of interior clear space to accommodate two vehicles. 35. These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 36. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain all project improvements and facilities, including the project streets, landscaping, park facilities, and drainage improvements. 37. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 38. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Fee (MSHCP) will be due upon issuance of each building permit. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 40. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 41. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 42. The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees, including but not limited to Development Impact Fees (DIF), at the rate in effect at the time of payment. 43. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 44. The developer shall comply with all Municipal Code provisions regarding construction debris removal and recycling as set forth in Chapter 14.12 (Construction and Demolition Waste Management) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 45. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall submit a product placement plan depicting the plan and design for each dwelling unit to be approved by the Community Development Director or designee Care is to be taken to ensure that adjacent units with the same floor plan reflect a diversity in architecture and colors and that there is adequate variation in architectural design (Added by the Planning Commission at its May 5, 2015 public hearing.) ENGINEERING General Requirements: 46. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 47. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, 48. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 49. This project shall comply with the recommendations of the traffic study prepared by Webb and Associates, dated October 12, 2005 and updated by VA Consultants. 50. If applicable, a Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 51. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. 52. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 53. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 54. Applicant shall obtain any necessary Caltrans permits and meet all Caltrans requirements for any work within Caltrans right-of-way. 55. Applicant shall obtain any necessary County permits and meet all County requirements for any work within County right-of-way. 56. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 57. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 58. The applicant shall incorporate bus bays in the street design unless not required by RTA. 59. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. 60. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 61. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 62. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8'/" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 63. Slope maintenance along right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association. 64. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 association. 65. All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 66. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 67. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 68. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 69. Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 70. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 71. Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 72. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances rohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 includes non -storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver — is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Approval of final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the subdivider shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted: 73. Prior to issuance of a building permit for development, written verification from Caltrans that the project's Traffic Impact Analysis is approved must be received by the City and the applicant shall pay the required TUMF and City Traffic Impact Fees and construct all required traffic improvements. 74. Construct the traffic signal at State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) and Grand Avenue. A south bound deceleration lane on State Route 74 shall be provided. 75. Interior streets shall be privately maintained and shall have a minimum width of 28' unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. 76. Construct and dedicate right-of-way on State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) from the channel to Grand Avenue per City's General Plan (half width + 12' improvements). The improvements include sidewalk improvements over the flood control channel to sidewalk improvements at the school site and a temporary ac sidewalk improvement from Grand Avenue to existing sidewalk approximately 390 feet south of Grand Avenue. The applicant shall construct the required landscaped median along State Route 74. Should Caltrans not approve the median, the applicant shall pay cash in -lieu of improvements for half - width of the required median improvements. Construct a deceleration lane for the project entrance on SR 74. The project entrance on SR 74 shall be right-in/out only. 77. Construct and dedicate right-of-way on Grand Avenue from the project boundary to State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) per City General Plan (part -width improvements). Full improvements shall be required from the old Riverside Drive to State Route 74. Cash bond in -lieu of construction of median improvements may be provided subject to City Engineer's approval. Full access shall be provided at the project entrance off of Grand Avenue. Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 78. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 79. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 80. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 81. Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 82. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements and a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the project to be approved prior to final map approval. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 83. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 84. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 85. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 86. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that minimize sight distance standards. 87. Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 88. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 89. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 90. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 91. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan, 92. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 93. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 94. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 95. No structures, landscaping, or equipment shall be located near the project entrances that Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 minimize sight distance standards. 96. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Prior to Recordation of Final Map 97. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall process a roadway vacation such that the right-of-way is consistent with the boundaries as described in the approved Specific Plan. In the event that a roadway vacation cannot be accomplished, the applicant shall submit revised plans to the City for approval. (Added by City Council 9-12-06) Prior to Occupancy 98. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 99. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 100. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 101. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 102. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 103. The traffic signal at SR 74 and Grand Avenue shall be operational prior to 1st Occupancy. The applicant shall notify the City at least one month in advance should the signal turn on be delayed due to Caltrans review and approval or any anticipated delays. The City Engineer may allow certain occupancy prior to signal turn on if warranted. 104. Pay fair share costs of offsite improvements as identified in the traffic study. The fair share costs calculations shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the City Engineer. Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 105. Proof of maintenance responsibility and acceptance shall be provided for all open space, slopes, and drainage facilities, outside the public right-of-way. 106. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 107. Annex into CFD 2015-1 (Safety) Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services CFD; Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124. 108. Form Community Facilities District No. 2015 -XX Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable), the applicant may form Community Facilities District to allow for the funding of (i) public facilities and (ii) the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way forwhich the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements ("Maintenance Services") to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Alternatively, if a CFD is not formed pursuant to the preceding sentence, applicant shall form a CFD solely for Maintenance Services or annex into an existing CFD for such services (e.g. Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services)). Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 109. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay Quimby Act in -lieu fees at the rates in effect at the time of payment. Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-02 (THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-07 110. All interior landscape, recreation areas, facilities and/or open space to be maintained by the HOA. 111. Developer to comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 112. Developer to participate in City-wide LLMD. 113. Developer to annex into LLMD District 1 for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City. 114. All interior streets and/or roadways to be maintained by the HOA. 115. HOA to maintain all catch basins, collectors, v -ditches or any other related flood control or storm water control device. 116. Developer to design a multi -family recycling plan through the City and CR&R. 117. Developer to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 118. Developer to meet City curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. 119. Secondary access needs to be clearly defined as part of the development. 120. All existing palms (California Fan Palms and Canary Island Date Palms) to be incorporated into the project landscaping or donated to the City and relocated at the developer's expense. LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 121. Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer shall be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the District. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 122. The applicant shall work with Riverside County Transit Agency staff for bus turnout. The applicant shall install bus turnout along Riverside Drive and along Grand Avenue as required by Riverside Transit Agency. Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 16 City Council May 5, 2015 June 23, 2015 r m rn 0 QD n � -0 OO NI) N � m ��V 21 N Cn ' M D m CD CD (D NJN LQ• 0 Ir mo a 0 ;LJ#'u;LIF�J;I[t ' li;�i1 ; ;7i m �r 14c.m *13 ° � - 3. .. C Elk- ► t a - I N D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D a D {n —I 2 4 Vvv--IMMMMm0c>,cnU M.P•P -W �nn7o0 r WN�Q}�WN�O PWN�OWN-SOW-M 0- (A) Na nm m m rn Z a' 0 n F' � 2L°, x� CL Fn Fn F4 aaa r m C-) VCD CL 0c0 ������v�vyv���v���������,� m zr M 0 �'� (DZCDO ���•�� m CD 4 •P � 4S W W W W W N N N N N N N N -+ -� j ?� °�' C Cv CD CD _n N N N nm>wmo >wmxXXXnw>-nXxXXnwD„ CD CDCD wo �ncnCD CD nm> -n C) n°°> M Q XM ) -n Cn Www�o�' �',m o a,,v o c n{nCO v -�C7cn N v r. x D O nv v �•QTani n a �',a) '+n * 0 Q rn CD CD 3�-no =r -n N Z)35 -a n �3 a -4 CD :3�r r D �=CD CD+ v 5- a' a��3�a � cn�3�0- w m ,CD+ C.) v sn CD CD a) ( to c CD D CD CD C 4 0 :3cnD 0 -0 Q '* rn m 0 W n �'_ r_ 0 Z;0 Z co C 5 Q n 0 m D :3 ,c CD a). :2 co T 0 -n o aJ o ° 3 o � m CL (n @ X Qu CO c3Dcn m0 ,�+ CD v� cn CD Z5T� Z5 Q r+ Cl) O CD 4) � DTD t N- �� 3 IL rn ���-� ._ 'vA Co , 3 CD n Q CD -r ET W n � a 0 ;LJ#'u;LIF�J;I[t ' li;�i1 ; ;7i m �r 14c.m *13 ° � - 3. .. C Elk- ► t a - I N �nn7o0 r aamm f� z Z a' 0 n F' � 2L°, x� CL Fn Fn F4 aaa r m C-) VCD 7 0� M 0 �'� (DZCDO ���•�� m www Www Cv CD CD _n N N N 01 �+ Q v CD n CD :3�r '0 Q to ,CD+ C.) v sn CD CD a) ( to c -0 Q '* rn CCD Q n 0 m D :3 ,c CD a). v N Co � CL (n @ CO c3Dcn ,�+ CD cn CD Q r+ Cl) � W � 4) � 'vA V/ 3 CD CD -r W a 0 ;LJ#'u;LIF�J;I[t ' li;�i1 ; ;7i m �r 14c.m *13 ° � - 3. .. C Elk- ► t a - I N .��, ]I as I L__ 0 0 - -----------o SHARED EASTb EST � b7 o z 0 r o m M 11J o r. W N my �zr mz� >y� .��, ]I as I L__ 0 0 - -----------o SHARED EASTb EST � O z .d ddi�i�a �y v � r t 24'-0 " N h � r- ro o c 0 z y l+, >z xo i H n�0 D - N �scercn.com O �T A n' tom=�Dz0 a ®�--7EFnD� n Cc: 0o z d O� O w O 0D a D 0 ►-may �J p0 m D � wo C: m � C m n 0 r r 0 z y l+, >z xo i H n�0 D - N �scercn.com O �T A Li i a N `e G CCD O C? U o c RIM r > O zo �x a n x i� rr�y> Q------------- C '� v • A J a n x i� Q------------- Cri C az �r znoo> S :�tixN O kICA�CX.COm Y � � f jryIjI'-. Z I Wuz s -SI{B- _REDFA SCbiPNT - _ - _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ b ? ^ D b �y V S � _ > r Y Y � � f jryIjI'-. Z I Wuz s -SI{B- _REDFA SCbiPNT - _ - _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ 41 N zQ� cm @un mn BCW=�-0 000z Z-r— NO 000 D� d 0u 'o> m Wer m � cn c7 m C 0 r r IEMMI:ISI: 0 0 71 D L C^Z) (n 0 o ,rnyy�, roc ZZ =-y 0 Q.. Z77 n c�c =0C) CD z Z>O C.0 cn � r Q o� oQ ra a �n Z �� -4 jo rn c �1 � C rn t 1 �r x� y0 _N kEcarch.com 23 u,. - s _ czr G �q O n rD d C Q" (G CD O CD 07 d N W N [D n -_ fl_o 7C�DD�1 ro =�DZ� Fl L, L oo,.P> ZOo �� OoD2 (Z? o 'oD m Nor z J� C � l Xl az �r x� n�o C N J� W klwrch_mm r > O Zr 1-0 1 z = 23A" q,. 0 0 N C"7 r rn =��sx P 0 0 N C"7 r rn ;4-s SHARED EASTMENT :� z ¢ ooD�� N =� z o e WCWT00o (DD O) Z r C) W N0-) Cco � no DQti.1 p U P < co > z C �7 in rrn`! V) Cf C m 0 0 r r :� z r h r O z H L4"'b"' , 7rf- w o.� ti N 4:I i s ti N 4:I i y x m y a z y C >z n r" x� ' klcerch.00m a i r r C — Mu n Y a , '; a a_, ; I 1a I I x az z �r �x i C�l klcaroh.com o 7K0)nn�, CD p � cf) -0 Q c c z Q >o z� Oo N 0 D( aC, m N z c c m c n m � o r I � 0 Al :,v c r � w 0 �O C'7 r y In O C aZ �r x� 0> klcprch.com +� s 0 O r rilITI3 H C) x w-3 i 0 O H; �ff�-4 0 O 0- o ---o � � v� O TM>>D U QCT ZZA ..�cOD _- _> �O �.. Z—D > 0> 60i Z Z O C)O N�O0 DU � 0 o cn y A m Nil W�9 ti Z A C m 0 � W O �y l 1 C Iod�i' - N N - til r i U 40'-10" I 00 �mDD`°yC �0 6Ccoy ZO /� rn �V'C m -0c c>�C�SD�O N6 OO D00 O 0 > _ oD N Z CIO C c � c_ ri7 n � C 0 � o r a x m a r > O Z rr w0 >PO M � z N C" n In 0 z C:T, 'u CD ro � � � I C C CL CD Cp o �- C 8Z Z 41 -CGS Z ��r>-0 DOO m N�0 C2 0O Qn > A �n J r' z c� o C m C_ Ln C) O � O r r n a x m a r > O Z rr w0 >PO M � z N C" n In 0 z C:T, 'u CD ro � � � I C C CL CD Cp o �- o - o^Q U)(0 00 0)DDV m2�Dz0 �•- z ��D ���C0� —Oz I Z- F n Noo >a� Q nLT, �> m c C U) � C m cn C-) m 0 CD r 'c>Pe;: ryn m�A d�Ci ri ,iw C3 p�C Fin < �99R)in pCp y N m 0 0 70 r �p zoW y x n� z° Lno Ik z 0 --.- 0 OQ >0 \./�y n MZ co c a C z 11,00> 70 m C_ m n 0 � r i ^r ` 1 r �p zoW y x n� z° 1 G Ik con --.- �Yr rP z 11,00> .L - F 3 klwmh.com Y� = JT 3 r f 0 , IF 1 G Ik --.- z 11,00> .L 9 n cn klwmh.com 3'-,y2' M 40 a m C >zz z; x� ¢marcn.wm CA m b Yz � z r C 0 o Q o R0 r4tz z Ic ®cs,cmn� c"z"-0 0 ooz zpr> W N"":E 0,0-0 >0`.J 0 0 ur CD m � C� z c., o a 4 C: � � c m C cn m C) o V r \ l r rl `1 0 z .A 0 0 z a - 0^o CIi Co v N T--> 0 Wc" 0C ;0,z�zp>o Nff oQ yo o O o co n N C� ti z c� o a c c 70 ctTJ _ m � C �n m O r r n az �r x� 0> klcerch.com S 17 z PO C) 0 0 r rilOTI3 r O FEN -I---' z c� jc c J 0 r 00 Q� D D F—I �J 0 SOD N� r N z C C m l�� C-) O r r rilOTI3 r O FEN -I---' la A- I N : 42z2]-A:lmm 1 1 `i7 r 0 PO OIVz O z cr ®J=�� rn � mo c N N� �Cll nO O O CJ'i O cfl D � 70 c I�1 m m C n m � 0 r la A- I N : 42z2]-A:lmm 1 1 `i7 r 0 PO OIVz O z o- (f) (0 00' n' �C zz0 J@vC0�� _ (,r C (A=() Z -> rn p Go co y N a Q� O ��----yy N o cn> `1 ; r z Co > c C x m C_ m (7 O Fri O r r Pq M az nr xr) z=y j kkmrch.mm n r y I'd z w i r z w 4 s 7 UL e �r r -' ♦ �. � k , � •. � �I r ..•:'fit fi �•3S ?. �'.i � .�� .s�41 • r � - yti. '°� �� �salt _ 41 T �N f w� •V Ate I,a �.i z Vl4{ Cot; 4 s 7 UL e �r r -' ♦ �. � k , � •. � �I r ..•:'fit fi �•3S ?. �'.i � .�� .s�41 • r � - yti. '°� �� �salt _ 41 C) L�^0 (n CD V 00 (n>YV 7�ZZQ v 7 co0ZZ- �O 00 DO� o�00 Ui < cn Y r z c4 o I c m m cn c k� Z; m C7 rcc-r � � C r r n nr x� _ y � �\ O klCerCh.cprn r z 113 a �,"c��C c��flm cncnZ I Z- rO 0 0oo >o❑ 0 0�y, �� C N L m z c� a c c m C C m 0-4 � o r r n aZ z r 00 k�cerch.cem W � � C O m p lu m a z s I i li m o c y w m ms's z z R m o m _m s A v zH� c im r m a z y my w u6 m - 6mi A gA^ods as F ' us> " ^< - m m N_ N_ i . ~ -mi IX Dm M= O < M> D ~ zM o w°m o v oo m o r z m o - m O 0,0 � D z0 �nmm z z mc- O -G v oW D m z o ° D z o 4itmm oma o y �7 —)90 m� m�o Xz x r mo ° -I J�J DO ,5 0;�e--5 KI n zm� r u z D D '.. T -- <m m <mD CO — " z — o z x >° m n z C n x !� �zo1�-i m iA Ia l R— it 0 g w ° mm r N F D z u -I li aZz y N r I m III �I� IA s, - O C a N "_ m s o >� - m �- - m "' O 1" r a m m° _ m o° m z ��� --- m y e o= CD m w to G) �'` m m = mii Im m G) m m m R 11 N " cn m �Lo !G7 o m CJ l - di m x ffi } z m <n C7 x o ^ ) ? 5- V7 . O O _ — m zr T AX z Cr `l m E - m s Z eirwso. nve 14vrc �;+ m o< O cI V o o s 0 s = m n q m 1 mac) A k= z -- ti z a = o z p � _ m I m � I"' a a m m 1£ D _ 1 D - ° rn m Q � �- _ - -T- P. 9 3 G7 a mZa p �— 0zg le sm zo A rn m o'er V _ J O z W O C W T.w.r.G ..,eeecu\il]20i9S�w9\�ol6�leGAwlelM:-!u+\i�t26iP.N�sOi-Wr�n_9r�n;.1.90,✓^/�' V.'v' N�_ .Y w _w. ebb Geircm PFI - �� av IM A > r > o, o s�� e �m �> 1 m m a r -- // >1 r- '� J m -1 / y iii �• A MM CD y u N h ¢� - GRAD AVENUE - — - -- A_ _m FD �e e fps i i/ �e -ancr eouNonar e - o I I eo. —� I 17 ` ro u /l' 1I E M u u N N m 12413 1 i � N IM i m e v u e m e u 1 v 1 a , MP p 7 p c FIRMI, i r T n 1 V� av u m u o01, 1 2958 > 55 (4 m= o N v o o f m o ee > > m _ r i F= a , m , c f s n i i / 1 r - c m i r A o my w , v z N v m � m jj \ o yc y i - ' ° v- ,❑ 9f U 1E flr- r r m _ o c IF Fill , 06 me , c �P H m i .o _ n a _ U ¢ 1 _ - m a I ec P° ,e o o 000 �'✓� f q �a v N mn a O0 2861 r- O F 2t 2 ` FF-,2Hn 1 -Zi 1 J M-1282.5 _� \ PAp 12870 1 F LF � I v FF 2Jc o — , ez F ues- I _ PAo 128,]- PAo i28fi z m I . _ _ m � A a � m <C 2845 _ { 0 33 11r u vo e � I im n E m I S'I r m 1 Fri) - r Nm _ a v n m _ Ls >� I Mi --' -n SEE SHEET 3 as a a< m D j mx—jm > m a r = D Z n Z W � ti > ZOFr n m o O w m � O rn n \ z W N o w 11 I= /18/X,5 F, w R 1I 11 1-t. -00 L SEE SHEET 2 i m -00 m SEE SHEET 2 m CO n - - m- b p c D ] p n y O »e � a DD ( n<<D n I OZA 1 e m m � M D Z a r o n Z a Z r m op p o a b L a o vc m v �C 7 W m _ __ ------ — -- --- — ------------- xznnG :npW IR2m9pm9,oee,cryAn:wyplarAHxVp4L6�0]M'u0i-ILn_sa �zbkSJV rtT�W r�e/3ms xA`9/6✓uwm G�nnx� m m CO n m- Z O � a DD 1 n<<D x m m � M D Z a r o n Z a Z r O W m 4 O N O n y N w GJ o z O � xznnG :npW IR2m9pm9,oee,cryAn:wyplarAHxVp4L6�0]M'u0i-ILn_sa �zbkSJV rtT�W r�e/3ms xA`9/6✓uwm G�nnx� gon£f I`i R� row N N O •D N m �o a m l Z =n m m m s a Z �I' 1 _ = f o y x� m � gES fD x� o - - go - _ IT S�� £ im -E-a;� y o gog>A o z A a ox ooh^ - _9 N e> �� �, D x - - � f m n m D _ _ A _ y r t^^ CA v m Z v S-4 k M m m v's mz � � v 15 z CO Ln 0 zx O zO 0 Z _ D Tmzcn IM J $;=o m — o� — o a O J D C Z Z r — O Zz o <m Om �1O —n O 7DO�z M x m$ ODN r C -TO 0-1 °m oymy ZM�cn v m g 0 ;� Nm 0Lo- Aro—i oa-��i =gym T� �_ �� m m i- 0 ml 1 O I� m �- o Gni Z X11 Z a g�� C m> o_ g GZzi G) u- Z Z cf, _ �_ T D D n� v :� ': O>O �� �m m im z �? O C Z n cr) - jl m -_z o D T ^ Z Z S N ^N m r :i m_ m> = m Z mim "< �m m m� D z �� �^ p► _ r — G'J iii 1� _ m Om W w m aj oe H o k m m CD n a G)u m i m k t R C m Qr k iu o ii ^� A I u — n n m m "�--mss=�� m >m -I o IM to n = Z 0 Z ,� ' -nl ti z O (/1 m Z Cn ^ —r �� mo Z; a� im D n m � .Z r m %, f - m IuN Z eivEaS� nvE. (vwr i , 01l Z < >Cl) 0 po D l �� T D _ D M s oarVcn s ^ v z 5c> m D^! r r d > O m - m i am w 70 yK3 uew.r+t :^R'+\inn.OwJtw9la-'Ae.9�n'^�\e�vnal-I�:.l l:�a�diymp�_il.r�>_q-o�raG.9 a0nm iryLtyu 2ss .v bv.upro Uarvsol EK z%y m Amo' 9a4�?r �m 0 m I fly ^mom � I a �O y Mm lin GRAND AVENUE m Ll! 1/ lRAC1 BJlIADAP �. 9Cg m — s L- >� ��r�—� , o� 111 I -`i� � f t I ALLEY I I All£Y I aloe 0 Y -a24 24 , Z m _ I �—_ —J > m 1 -- - - - - — ' f � � mi rr m > \ J \ o L I m� TD C ] �1�Iz' a, T" I I� a 1 9 L A � �] � i I i 00 1 enL a paier41%'�Z.OiOT=ry4 eTJ�9�erm el�+vnmem1 r,Z1.otN-NvnCP-!'mJitivn-Ol-Obpa9 alO�M VR/n l5 _'35 PN F` nl[eb WxbM SEE SHEET 2 ym I _�O o C 4 e 1 . I m m p�_-I-d I I I I I Cl) mn q v =i H m -i -< m Rc i -n o �_ I E __ I I i3nRVV4J �WNo�Uoo� o_ C N� —� D a — Q � o ^ uRm N m I � r Z a -0 m D Z w m N V o l N I O � W 11"I PLLET p�_-I-d I I I I I H � ANtlOulIG01JVtl1 �_ I E __ I I i3nRVV4J �WNo�Uoo� o_ N� a — Q a m £ o ^ uRm zsa g m 1 Ir o= - z. z ai �� �m o = m F lu m o m �^ a N m? z zm _o F Q l I0 - _ _ - - m m m m _??m > a y C-) 25 �lo 55 n A > t_ oo zozzc `. 9 z I � - SII n S pf co D m mti m Am - r o a my D z vc - m m C-1 € m12 '- m Zm m' y k v 1 x � v7v I m n � s e »Umm D IM ', = s m y Q zr p`s^I� N c o � OXO Q Z 1 AR > m MZ Ny O _' _ 3 nio Q� m n D �0 < N D�� g m j z> (D Q (n Cn -G <Z r IMD�IIr`Q0pmr'0 —� ° o m Z Z 0 -i -a a a mZ� D Q °��m Zthmr omx D G D —+ IJ� mZ� ;u �o m z D m D T. --a Ao° --I m —i m no, m� m l 111 L �'m i �� �U- N m� R � ON Z -� m r- r m �) w I E >) o>> 0 i Q C y D r �J n°off cm Z Z I-� -T ,n II' .Z1 II mgr A it Z�'C i �> m Z Im III (m ilp m D O Cl) m T o A ti ➢ R ;Q III T_- y � III r O Z 1 it �m V/ O D iii— 4 Ili O rn O>O m p 0 R < - m m ��� co D Z > m C ,.A ° m m n 1 =Im m z m - " ` AFL N < o w 0 N r - Z !--�- 'n z ,I ?I r mm r m -n IMIM lim IM Gni T D G7� m m m C !m Im o m"a n a n n 1 M - c��� il? n�a MM >x v� mm Z DO=� \ 2 z TI ml �m/ ".a mac -y<o�� 0 N_ m m m �z1<O m _ 1 = C/1 > m C7 x :11 < 1 _ TJ ,< I oae rcn - m m. m m<m D (D m — H N m ( > m*m-., _ m m z POI� of n l �) - m. N 16 m A r- IM 12 R 11 mco n . N s oa p v� Z n �� D 1— �-r-1 ( ! h f h,w�a m IM 3M7 �x � ' o .r 1 a > z am �� mG N m. �� ° <m a (q V - n N ¢ m W o 0 i u...< r,w�n�zzo�orus!�nurt�7.,!wm,«ow:zolr.»o.o�b,�..w�m.a amr�u v:a mrs.ve w o^ gun. onla+ 1 I I I � I "I o -� �x'� - -�� EA Ike j - I fj 14- "'':; a m, I m m x a z _i$ $ Z Affi ° EE. e e a I o � a � o [ 7 a m', Q - DlsJ z tl A 0. IM ZI i t � c r m _ FIJI R o i I N^ tmamm cn m ->[> T SEE SHEET 3 1 <mRr m In r- Z>a im D o -1a m z ppm r D N CD z z S Zo z r Om x co m I � w o 1 aarm /11/1011 w2 ry m — .,o.o ;cf) Py� v p s G S o G. 05 4 o oa r m : � m � _. - n J a m E n - (D Am mi a f GRAND AVENUE --- -T (D./��/ �J~ _ --— ". —T m r2 A / eowvonar I \ 1 - ao=aseoara - ' n� c � m6 I En 3] It I10 I 1 < m o� -R-4444 1 p a. vi I o L I I s Elk r ;g m � �v I m tN � I 14 U 1 - c 0 V o .. 1 � 0 1 I I I � I "I o -� �x'� - -�� EA Ike j - I fj 14- "'':; a m, I m m x a z _i$ $ Z Affi ° EE. e e a I o � a � o [ 7 a m', Q - DlsJ z tl A 0. IM ZI i t � c r m _ FIJI R o i I N^ tmamm cn m ->[> T SEE SHEET 3 1 <mRr m In r- Z>a im D o -1a m z ppm r D N CD z z S Zo z r Om x co m I � w o 1 aarm /11/1011 w2 ry m — .,o.o SEE SHEET 2 a i 3:1 I -- — -- ---- D — — — m' I � I I _ Ax aj m �� �- t m � Imo- 1 I e I g R p 5T-' R I � FER 11E, �',IZ DL o m > � � � �, �� _ ____ - --� l3FlflVM0lOtlIN00-OfS0-3 AIN008 3M6N3Ntl ✓0 I 1 _ s ` I 4 p m n o r t u� 14a CCa M1 r I I\ [n c a 11ff ._ \\..� o n tOD 100 MiN JI 5, v 5 _ � Q ' o0 j \ w I o r � � �'� X NV 1 ➢ � 100 I l� sW 100 .aV I 1. r � I as Mln D t j 7 6 —r D� o im Ila e� D o "` ou n = CO .. D T 100 Ino Wm n 5 m—Im —1 T ,ao zoo' sw zo 030 1 <<a O � G � I M D a T Z>�m r por - D �xm Z 9OS CD xlwl osw O O a 5. m o N �iW Oz � n CI r - 4o Q fIm u N �� �m - L GRAtJD AVECyUE _ �n-aacraourvonar _ - rox PF oleo mom ts-� r i x —�— 1 del�- 4-1 R3_3 12969 +M � 4 It£p V It 11 . JO 113E J. 12`Z 6e Nor x t6 �z 0 u u 0 9 I I —N t y m a - v s it Tt e l m a t d a s C m°J r� N A t= o na v ' 1 of sii go h l 4 1 I I A I ww I. IP _ m s z N 2i - I ,sx m toit, - � o129&0 I t7 I o I w I s Aolj I�K�..�m.ati m m vm m e v � I m m mm o m. f Z ( a ; Lpa g p u FF 1282 <�'— �� PP 1281] , PAD 2%3 Z v t t a � �a'_1284ai 0 P m D I - ICS _ 1 I N n r- y m m SEE SHEET 5 okz-Z,:5o aDDam z� -D� o o v ZO mm- 1� n A zm O Wmm r 0 J N n IW o 11 .,n.:;,A:;117Mtmgvmeete.1�—t111-1.9v 7;,ornw�ot�t,_g,�am-cr-m�.I., III. xw w m Cl. 00 oa o� u cn o� FD' r r n SEE SHEET 4 �11 MIR �o N v v o m _ m r I I m� v m vEn 1 , m 9a 1276,2 O -0i yr r a m IS ^I ; v m i 1 _ — m R i y ; a_ v w cD o U i m 1 0 � , ...: — T�PPVM'J—lOtlIfN1'J QOOlf NMO'J 30160M1—�.v� - _ — , 0 ]I 1 t � y _G v $ a .A C \ — F O e ' ive;y � x m m 0 mm-1m� r(Am obi>�0 >> m> D m m m r D<� D mMZ> M rD aO 0lym > z :p .C�• Z O 1 0 fA - vx > z0 Z 0 Om w m W N - W V N IN Ui VI � o w r CD 0 rD 0 v. lop L J C N -n m 0 m M -0 0 m F rD o a1 m ge �_ �'In n =r GRAND AVENUE 9I M m O m FS I—rMS 'ISM IMIC � � 'I■I' � � &I ,Ll , lL�L� T� I I i mr'h mmm F,���'-0 -�, ra-m. 11■II_13II_MIIM11_2L_ � � I I,ff J a I�II�'J�i 1 3 (D m (D 0 fb ��.-�, II � 1 ,1 •I I I� i I � � � � I T� I I F's"�' mmm F,���'-0 ra-m. � � I s � a I�II�'J�i 1 3 (D m (D 0 fb ��.-�, II � 1 ,1 •I I f i � I�r d � � • I j O "rwe[aal ------ 6l rt 0" ID u�a�sa�nla- (D _ rt m I I� i I � � � � I i� I i I � � I s � I m ml o I0 0 !c 0 O a C 0 Z c 0 n Z m m c) ,rt �, o M a o —n rt_ 7 {n ro C - � $ m I i� I I I f i � I�r d � � • I j O "rwe[aal ------ 6l rt 0" ID u�a�sa�nla- (D _ rt m I C m mCDCD _ 0 r cn G)0 o m� Z ato z D ©LIAIT. r In _ ...n. 7 ° cQ N S ° _. mCD � c 3 �o CDro �o m y y s ro z z o 3 'p n rD m - C ro n rn ® v 5} aQ� cn ° D O z CD U) N_ X N C,�Lo. I �a�� =17 �• 0 ,..� c a� Q (D � n v CTI ro = _a CD w 2, °o_ -n ro 0) _ A a CD -n �' rr� a m T�TI W o m > 1 w C) @ n77rn e �� o W @ t1 = Q La Q V ' yCD C'jY %C 0 CD p cr C U < 0 � cQ W �v I O- C i 79 ih �Ty" V C Cl)C cu (n .rt K ii=_A C n Al [n m C CD N p ^ D C7 CD � No' -{ v p _ p 6 D 2 Z o � n r --j C7 O CD I M M CD O co r m 0 > m____ o cn ! - Z)m D(D rn CD CO) r.L a - rn ra o z \, D ; _ x �. --- cD m _ @ m .� — n Q O C/)i n as < _ (D ' O CD �] o \ C ro @ m�—� V rD 4�h Cu CD cn 07 n - � @ Q� rt Q1 z un � � v rD o rn' CO r —_ F7 I rt N < l0 O O @ -_._......_._ .. ._ _.__ Q \. rF ✓f � nIu --.... -_ CD m 7 7 Q C f O ,�4 C 0 CD cn C 7 SD CD CA N rn cb� 7 -lopo n ao rn O O o= v o ° = ra o f z u z — .. O 77 E > f i nb;n m = nN C 3 ((D (<p 1 2 7. cr n Q-�.- C p r> _ m ? z i > °� - CLo N I'1 ? 0 '� d rvi N -< d (J) @ n oz n0 rD G1 y0 M ° m D rt T @ @ rD � 14 y N rnD z p A D z w C) n • ww„ , 4 a ._� I, ,... ��: sac � ■1 .�v �f�- r CD m 0 CD 0 0 Ly I m r >x x MT M o• r � D U)3 o m o Cl) n � fD m� C� 771 771 r `� I Z GRAND AVENUE rat �palr+o� �� uwno� ao+sa�nsa LA KEVIEW VILLAGE e •® - { | - o cn LA KEVIEW VILLAGE e •® - { | cn f � EqF§§§! .,pw� \ � \ � 11 ,�Yx <, 1 1f` r' LTJ 1..E IOLjY...i REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk DATE: June 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular Successor Agency meeting of June 9, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom Agency Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates Executive Director Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 9, 2015 11TP Or 1..f11<I &}L41HORE. V, DKA Tuesday, June 9, 2015 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCY MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCY MEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7:00 PM Chair Manos called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. ROLL CALL LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PRESENT: Agency Member Hickman, Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice -Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos Also present: Executive Director Yates, Agency Counsel Leibold, and Deputy Agency Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Consideration of Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case Agency Counsel Leibold announced that the Agency would be meeting in Closed Session to discuss the Item identified on the Agency Closed Session. The Agency recessed to Closed Session at 5:02 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. Chair Manos reconvened the meeting at 7:56 p.m. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Cultural Center Successor Agency Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Agency Member Hickman, Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manes Also present: Executive Director Yates, Agency Counsel Leibold, Administrative Services Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, and Deputy Agency Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the Agency met in Closed Session at 5:00 p.m. to discuss one (1) potential case of Anticipated Litigation, under the authority of Code Section 54956.9, pursuant to paragraph (4) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9. Agency Counsel Leibold stated no reportable action was taken. PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-622 Approval of Minutes Attachments: SA Staff Rpt Minutes for Approval SA Minutes of May 12 2015 It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. 2) ID# 14-623 Warrant List dated May 28, 2015 Attachments: SA RDA Staff Report 6-09-15 SA RDA Warrant Summary 05 28 15 SA RDA Warrant List 05 28 15 It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated May 28, 2015. Motion by Vice Chair Tisdale, second by Agency Member Johnson, to approve the Consent Calendar, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Vice Chair Tisdale, Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Hickman, Agency Member Magee, and Chair Manes NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Successor Agency Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 BUSINESS ITEM(S) 3) ID# 14-624 Exchange Agreement Between The Successor Agency And Civic Partners -Elsinore, LLC Attachments: SA Staff Report Civic Exchange Agreement Approval 060315 Channel Edge Parcel Vicinity Map & Survey Master Developer Parcel Vicinity Map SA Reso Approving Exchange Agreement Exchange Agreement 060315 -- It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. SA -2015-003 RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING THE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CIVIC PARTNERS•ELSINORE, LLC. Agency Counsel Leibold provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation to the Agency. Counsel Leibold explained the proposed exchange agreement identifies a portion of the channel edge property as 2.77 acres of Agency owned property in exchange for Civic Partner -Elsinore, LLC comprising of 4.35 acres. The Agency identified this property in its long range property management plan as property subject to an enforceable obligation, meaning it is required to provide for this exchange under the terms of the DDA Agreement. Motion by Agency Member Johnson, second by Agency Member Hickman, to adopt Resolution No. SA -2015-003 A Resolution of the Successor Agency of the the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore approving the Exchange Agreement Between the Successor Agency and Civic Partners -Elsinore, LLC., passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Hickman, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ADJOURNMENT Chair Manos adjourned the Successor Agency meeting at 8:01 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. Steve Manos, Chair Diana Giron, Depty Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 C; i l`Y 011-A DRLAM L,)�FREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk DATE: June 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of June 9, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron, Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 9, 2015 CI 1 til l'- -.v. LI)i�E , ffes., LS11'10IkE =.tet,. VoutA 1•. exrnn.�r City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITYMANAGER LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, June 9, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. Mayor Manos called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manes Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council would be meeting in Closed Session to discuss the Item identified on City Council Closed Session. The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:02 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Mayor Manos reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Marissa Hill, Senior with Girl Scout Troop # 1124. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 City Council Meeting Minutes ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss one (1) potential case of Anticipated Litigation, pursuant to paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9. City Attorney Leibold stated that no reportable action was taken. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS *** Recognition of Girl Scout Troop # 1124 Mayor Manos and Council Member Johnson presented certificates of recogntion to Girl Scout Troop # 1124. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pam Nelson, resident of Warner Springs and Chair of the Sierra Club of the San Gorgonio Chapter, thanked Council and staff for their support of the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail Project. The four (4) city planning team, Cities of Temecula, Wildomar, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, and the Sierra Club received the Merit Award from the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Ms.Nelson recognized former staff member Claudia Davis and Community Services Director Skinner. Sonja Wang, new owner of the The Links thanked Mayor Manos, Council Member Johnson and City Manager Yates. Ms. Wang stated as new owners, they are committed to restore and maintain The Links as a premier recreation center. Robert Lewis, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke regarding future development in the Alberhill area and stated it is his understanding the delay is that the City is not releasing the necessary documents for public comments. Mr. Lewis requested that the City release the necessary documents, so that the public can make comments regarding development of the Alberhill area. City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 June 9, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-609 Approval of Minutes Attachments: CC Minute Report CC Minutes of 5-12-2015 It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. 2) ID# 14-610 Warrant List dated May 28, 2015 Attachments: City Staff Report 6-09-15 Warrant Summary Citv 05 28 15 Warrant List City 05 28 15 It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on May 28, 2015. 3) ID# 14-611 Annual Adoption of the Investment Policy Attachments: REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL -2015 Investment Policy 2015 Investment Policy City of Lake Elsinore Memo PFM Group Under Government Code Section 53646(a), the City's Investment Policy should be reviewed and adopted by City Council on an annual basis. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the policy. 4) ID# 14-612 CR&R - Annual Consumer Price Index Increase Attachments: 2015 CR&R Annual Consumer Price Index Increase 2015 Schedule of Rates Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the annual increase information. 5) ID# 14-613 Award Agreement for Public Works Construction For Annual Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A Attachments: Staff Report - Award Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A Agmnt Citywide Slurry Seal Phase 1A Appendix A It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to All American Asphalt in the amount of $137,783.36, for the Annual Citywide Slurry Seal Program Phase 1A, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; and 8.) Authorize the City Manager to execute change orders not to exceed 15% contingency amount for adjustment in bid quantities; and City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted into the City's maintained system. 6) ID# 14-614 Amended and Restated Park Implementation Agreement for 24 Acre Park within the Eastlake Specific Plan Attachments: Staff Report - Summerly Civic Park Implementation Agreement 060415 24 AC Community Park Site Update Park Concept Plan 060415 Park Implementation Agreement 060315 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Amended and Restated Park Implementation Agreement in substantially the form and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 7) ID# 14-615 Citywide Landscapinq and Street Lighting District & the Landscaping & Street Lighting District No. 1 for the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Ordering the Preparation/Approval of Engineer's Reports and Resolutions of Intention Attachments: 2015-06-09 Ilmd cw and Ilmd no 1 FY 15-16 Lake Elsinore Citvwide LIVID Engineer's Report (060115MB) FY 1516 Lake Elsinore LMD1 Engineer's Report (060115MB) Reso 2015-049 Reso 2015-050 Rose 2015-051 Reso 2015-052 Reso 2015-053 Reso 2015-054 It is recommended that the City Council A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-049 ordering the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District (Citywide LLMD). B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-050 approving the Engineer's Report for the Citywide LLMD. C.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015.051 declaring Council's intention to provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments in the Citywide LLMD and setting a public hearing for July 28, 2015. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-052 ordering the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Landscaping & Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 (LLMD No.1). E.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-053 approving the Engineer's Report for the LLMD No.1. City or Lake Elsinore Page 4 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 F.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-054 declaring Council's intention to provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments in the LLMD No.1 and setting a public hearing for July 28, 2015. 8) ID# 14-616 Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Waiver for Fourth of July Fireworks and Approval to enter into an Agreement with Pyro Spectaculars, Inc. Attachments: Staff Report - MUNICIPAL CODE WAIVER FOR 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS AGREEMENT FOR PRO SPECTACULARS INC June 9 2015 ATTACHMENT - PYRO SPECTACULARS INC PROPOSAL 2015 It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and approve purchase under LEMC Section 3.08.070F - Exception to bid procedures (When in the best interest of the City, the City Council may authorize the City Manager or Purchasing Officer to bypass the bid process required under this chapter for purchases greater than $30,000); and B.) Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Pyro Spectaculars, Inc. for a Fourth of July Fireworks Show in an amount not to exceed $35,000. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale to approve the Consent Calendar; passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, Council Member Hickman, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) 9) ID# 14-617 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1338 relating to the Zone Change No. 2014-01 for Meadow Ridge II Attachments: Staff Report - Second Reading of Ordinance Meadow Ridge Ordinance No. 2015-1338 Zone Change for Meadow Ridge II It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1338 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-01 FOR 20.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOLLAND ROAD, EAST OF HERMOSA DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CORSON AVENUE by roll call vote. City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation to Council to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordiance No. 2015-1338. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Council Member Hickman, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1338. Deputy City Clerk Giron read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1338, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-01 FOR 20.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOLLAND ROAD, EAST OF HERMOSA DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CORSON AVENUE. The motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Council Member Hickman, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES Council Member Magee ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 10) ID# 14-618 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1339 relating to the Annexation of Nichols Road and Zone Change No. 2014-02 Attachments: Staff Report - Second Reading of Ordinance Annexation Ordinance No. 2015-1339 Annexation Annexation 83, ZC 2014-02 - Exhibit A - Pre -Annexation Zoninc 5-26-15 It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1339 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO, 2014-02 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 83, by roll -call vote. Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation that Council waive further reading and adopt Ordiance No. 2015-1339. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Council Member Hickman, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1339. Deputy City Clerk Gir6n read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1339, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-02 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 83. Deputy City Clerk Giron took the roll -call vote and the motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 11) ID# 14-619 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1340 relating to the Zone Changes to the Diamond Specific Plan Attachments: Staff Report - Second Reading of Ordinance Diamond Specific Plan Ordinance No 2015-1340 Diamond Specific Plan Exhibit A - Diamond SPA 1 - CC Excerpted Redlined DSPA It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1340 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1340 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN by roll call vote. Deputy City Clerk Giron provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation that Council waive further reading and adopt Ordiance No. 2015-1340. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1340. Deputy City Clerk Giron read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1340, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN. Deputy City Clerk Giron took the roll -call vote and the motion passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 12) ID* 14-620 Adoption of the FY 2015-16 Annual Operating Budget Attachments: OPERATING BUDGET FY2015-16 STAFF REPORT v1 Resolution 2015-16 City Operating Budget 2015-16 Preliminary Operating Budget Final AIL Other Funds Summary Resolution 2015-16 Authorized Positions Authorized Positions Schedule Resolution 2015-16 Gann Limit 15-16 Gann Limit calculation It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FY 2015.16 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING THE CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN THE APPROPRIATIONS; and B.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS; and C.) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2015-16 AND SELECTING THE POPULATION AND INFLATION FACTOR ACCORDINGLY City Manager Yates stated on May 26, 2015 the City Council held an in depth budget workshop. Administrative Services Director Simpson will provide a presentation on the City's operating budget and will provide a presentation of the CIP budget to Council at a subsequent meeting. Administrative Services Director Simpson provided an overview of the annual operating budget process and staffs recommendation to Council. He reviewed the revenue and expenditure impacts; sales tax revenues; property values; continued population growth in the City, and improved unemployment rate. The general fund revenues have grown to $38,126,132 and are lower than the appropriations funds. Director Simpson also reviewed the expenditures and explained that the City is increasing its staffing level by three (3) new positions to replace high paid consultant positions and adding 14 part-time positions to the recreation department. He spoke regarding the deficit highlights from the Budget Workshop and stated the final budget will include the patrol hours, the number of sworn positions, and the ratio with a five year trend. The fish stocking funds will be increased to $25,000; under community support the City funded $6,000 for AED (Automated External Defibrillator) from the current year; and funding for holiday lighting on Main Street has also been included. The economic development budget will be presented at the next City Council meeting for a contract for an economic development consultant to prepare an economic development plan. Darren Hoopingarner, Temecula resident and Deputy District Vice President for Calfire Local 2881, spoke regarding safety concerns for firefighters and the community if fire station 10 is cut from the budget. Mr. Hoopingarner explained that the primary function of the fire engine from station 10 is to fight wildland fires, not muncipal fire fighting. He stated if the City is going to cut the fire engine from station 10 and rely on a fire engine from Calfire to respond to emergencies then the City will be relying on AMR (American Medical Response), paramedics or another engine throughout the City. Calfire resources can't always be relied upon because their mission is to fight wildland fires. Mr. Hoopingarner stated that cutting that resource in the City will make theirjob harder to protect the residents and firefighters. He hopes that the Coucnil will reconsider cutting station 10 and look at other options. City Manager Yates stated that this matter was discussed at length and that the City currently has four (4) fire stations. The recommendation was to unfund Station 10 and utilize state resources when it is appropriate and when it is not appropriate, the City will utilize the three (3) fire stations in the City. The goal for the City is that the Council has set a course of economic development and proceeding in a manner to bring in businesses, jobs, and resources that the City needs to facilitate City programs as it moves forward. The recommendation to unfund Station 10, also includes tracking of call volumes, and observe response times. The City's goal is not to put anyone in danger, but to put the City in a good financial position and review this item annually. City of Lake Elsinore Page 8 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Mayor Manos stated that the response times were adequate to unfund that station and set aside the funds from that station for this year. Mayor Manos stated that it was a difficult choice. Council Member Magee thanked City Manager Yates and Administrative Services Director Simpson for their diligent work on the the budget; the Budget Sub -Committee for an orderly presentation of the budget; and Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale for serving on the Public Safety Committee and making difficult recommendations concerning police and fire funding. He stated this budget maintains the City's reserve levels, reinvests in the City through enhanced economic development, retains Council's commitment to public safety and sets aside over 49% of the City's budget for police, fire and animal control services. Council Member Magee stated the City needs to rely on the leadership and good judgment from the Board of Supervisors in partnership with professional labor unions to allow us all to move forward in a financially sustainable manner while maintaining a commitment to public safety. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Hickman, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-055 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting the FY 2015-16 Annual Operating Budget and Establishing the Controls on Changes in the Appropriations, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-056 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Revising the Schedule of Authorized Positions, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-057 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Establishing the Appropriations Limit for FY 2015-16 and selecting the population and Inflation Factor Accordingly, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 13) ID# 14-621 Award Construction Contract to Hiphland Construction, Inc. for Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Cannon Road - CIP Protect No. 4432 Attachments: Award of Construction Contract for Deceleration Lane Southbound Decel Lane 115 RR Canyon Aqmnt Hichland Construction Inc- Bid Proposal It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Highland Construction, Inc., in the amount of $858,554.50 for the Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Canyon Road; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; and C.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and D.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. Interim Public Works Director Smith introduced Project Manager Solanki, Senior Engineer Tech McCalmont, Kristie Stelle, Vice President of Operations with Highland Construction, Inc., Wael Faqih, President of Falcon Engineering Services, and Tariq Malik, Construction Manager with Falcon Engineering Services, and Dennis Green, President of Green Com Inc. Director Smith provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation to Council. Director Smith explained the deceleration lane improvements will provided additional capacity and help reduce traffic in the area. He also reviewed the project schedule and stated the construction will begin after July 4th and be completed by early October. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Highland Construction, Inc., in the amount of $858,554.50 for the Southbound Deceleration Lane Improvements on Interstate 15 at Railroad Canyon Road; authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the final form approved by the City Attorney; authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Hickman, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 10 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Yates introduced new Fire Chief Shawn Newman. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Hickman announced that he will not be in attendance at the next City Council meetng and wished everyone a happy 4th of July. He stated that the new skate park on Palomar Court looks beautiful. Council Member Hickman thanked the Girl Scouts for the flags they provided at the Memorial Day Ceremony. Council Member Johnson thanked the Finance Team, Mayor Manos of the Budget Sub -committee, Community Services Director Skinner, Parks and Recreation Team, and Project Manager McCarthy for their hard work. She welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City. Council Member Johnson stated that this Girl Scout Troop is what makes the residents proud to live in Lake Elsinore and commended Troop #1124 for using their funds to replace flags that were used at the Memorial Day Ceremony. Council Member Johnson announced the the Art Show on Friday, June 12th from 2:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. and Saturday, June 13th, from 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Council Member Magee recognized the new renovations at Machado Park, Summerlake park, Yarborough Park and Serenity park and thanked Community Services Director Skinner and Interim Public Works Director Smith for getting the project delivered. He stated that the parks are beautiful and it is a job well done. Council Member Magee thanked City Manager Yates for the budget process and commended Administrative Services Director Simpson and the finance staff. Council Member Magee recognized the Historical Commissioners, Historic Society, and staff for the historical recognition event. Mayor Pro Tisdale stated that Lake Elsinore is the only city in the past three (3) years that has spent over $3 Million on a fire station and $1 million on a fire engine, so was hard to bare the criticism. He asked children to refrain from playing at the skate park at Serenity Park until it is completed. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale pointed out that the deceleration lane would not solve the traffic problem at Railroad Canyon Road. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City and wished Council Member Hickman a Happy Birthday. City of Lake Elsinore Page 11 City Council Meeting Minutes June 9, 2015 Mayor Manos wished Council Member Hickman a Happy Birthday and welcomed Fire Chief Newman to the City. He thanked Council Member Johnson, City Manager Yates, Administrative Services Director Simpson, Fiscal Officer Buckley, and the finance team for their work on the budget. He stated that it was his first year participating in the budget process and he was excited to see the additional revenue come in and that they had to make some tough choices during the budget process. Mayor Manos stated that the deceleration lane project at Railroad Canyon Road will get worse before it gets better and asked the public to be mindful and patient during the construction process. Mayor Manos spoke about Facebook comments regarding the Police Department and stated that the comments were supportive and this Council supports the Police Department and thanked them for the service they provide. Mayor Manos announced the Machado Park Ribbon Cutting and invited the public to participate in finding a name for the whale located in the play area; the Annual Kids Fishing Derby held on June 6th was a good event and thanked everyone involved ; the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail Ribbon Cutting on June 6th and stated that additional linkages are being considered to extend the trail. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Manos adjourned the meeting 8:18 p.m. to the Regular City Council meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. Steve Manos, Mayor Diana Giron, Deputy City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 12 CIT}` i�r t1a P:i L.+ -Y. E7fil PAtt Tuesday, June 23, 2015 CLOSED SESSION - None PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCYMEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCYMEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCYMEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PRONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Cultural Center The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CITY VISION STATEMENT The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams. City or Lake Elsinore Page 1 Primed on 6118/2016 Successor Agency Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Successor Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and turn it in to the Agency Clerk. The Chair or Agency Clerk will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless an Agency Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-638 Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. Attachments: SA Staff Rpt Minutes for Approval 6-9-2015 SA Minutes 2) ID# 14-639 Successor Agency Investment Report for May 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015, Attachments: SA RDA Investment Staff Report 2015-05 RDA Investment Report 2015-05 PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Successor Agency will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 611812015 crrtcar - Lf' K �rLSiHOJU. = s 1?II ( City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 PM PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CITY VISION STATEMENT The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov't Code § 54957(b)): City Manager CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of Section 54956.9 (2 potential cases) June 23, 2015 subdivision (d) of Gov't Code CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (1 potential case) PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS Recognition of Sheriff Deputy Carl Coats Recognition of Sheriff Sergeant Pete Giannakakos Proclamation Declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and tum it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) ID# 14-640 Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Attachments: CC Minute Report 6-9-2015 CC Minutes ID# 14-641 City Investment Report for May 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. Attachments: City Investment Staff Report 2015-05 City Investment Report 2015-05 ID# 14-642 Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of one (1) service body fleet vehicle to be awarded to Lake Chevrolet in the amount of $40,287.18. Attachments: Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Staff Report Exhibit A - Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Request for Proposal (RFP Exhibit B- Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle - Service Bed Lake Chevrol ID# 14-643 Approval of Professional_ Services Contract with Carole Donahoe to Provide Specialized Planning Services for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe for the provision of specialized planning services to the City of Lake Elsinore during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Consultant Services Contract 2015-2016 - Carole Donahoe - CC Staff Report - E Draft Consultant Services Contract 2014-2015 - Carole Donahoe 6-23-15 ID# 14-644 Approve designation of Mayor as City Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayoras the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 - October 2, 2015 in San Jose. Attachments: Staff report LOCC Voting Delegate LOCC Annual Conference Voting Delegate City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 6) 7) 8) 9) ID# 14-645 Professional Services Agreement between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore (Serenity Park Phase II Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement by and between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount not to exceed $79,409 for landscape architecture, engineering services and reimbursables related to design development and construction documents for Serenity Park Phase II located at 19685 Palomar Road and the adjacent 2.68 acre parcel (APN 370-120-045) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report - RHA Agenda Report 6-23-2015 ATTACHMENT - RHA Proposal - Serenity Park Improvements ATTACHMENT - RHA Schedule of Proposed Fees Costs ATTACHMENT- RHA Professional Services Agreement ID# 14-646 Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Recommendatiow It is recommended that the City Council Approve and award the Agreement for Contractor Services to West Coast Arborist in the amount of $85,000 (plus 10% contingency, for a total budget of $93,500) for Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such form as approved by the City Attorney, and Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments not to exceed 10% contingency, as needed for emergency/extra work. Attachments: Staff Report Tree Trimming Contractor Services Agmt 2015 ID# 14-647 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with HR Green California. Inc. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with HR Green California, Inc., for engineering, project support, and plan check services in the amount of $242,080, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments, Staff Report -Amendment No. 2 HR Green Attachment'A' - HR Green - Amendment No 2 to PSA Attachment'B' -Active List of Land Use Applications ID# 14-648 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement With Sustainable Civil Engineering Services Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No, 3 to approve the third year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Sustainable Civil Engineering Services, Inc. (SCES), for project management and plan check services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report - Extend SCES PSA - Amendment No. 3 Attachment A - Amendment No. 3 to SCES PSA City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 10) 11) 12) ID# 14-649 Award Agreement for Professional Services for 1-15/Main Street Interchange Design Services Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Award Agreement for Professional Services to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions for the Design of the 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals; and Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $238,668 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report Main Street 1-15 Design Services PSA PSA with Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Professional Services 2015 ID# 14-650 Award Construction Contract to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. For Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements - CIP Project No. 4369 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $234,833 for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the total Agreement, pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. Attachments: Staff Report - Whisker's Parking Lot Improvement Construction Services Agmt ID# 14-651 Agreement For Operational Management of La Laguna Resort And Boat Launch Between Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. And City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Approve the Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report -- La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 ATTACHMENT - La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 Final City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Printed on 611812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING(S) 13) ID# 14-652 Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 & Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. C.) Introduce by title only and waive further reading of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements. Attachments: SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Staff Report 6-2£ SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Vicinity Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Aerial Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Resolutions and SPA 2014-02 & RDR 20147-07- The Village at Lakeshore - Amended Specific F SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - AMND 6-23-16 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 4-21 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 5-5- APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEMS 14) ID# 14-653 Professional Services Agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. (DMG Economics) for Provision of Economic Development Services Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018. City or Lake Elsinore Page 6 Printed on 6/1812015 City Council Regular Agenda June 23, 2015 Attachments: Staff Report - 7-14-2015 dmg FINAL DMG INC Professional Services Agreement 7-1-2015 D M G C o rp o ra to P ro f i l e 0615 15) ID# 14-654 City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform and Resolution No. 2015-061 Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and B.) Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Attachments: Staff report Legislative Platform - 3 revised Reso on Legislative Program and Policy revised 3 LegislativePlatform Final 2 Council Policy No 400-13 Legislative Platform and Program Policy 2 revised PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 16) TMP -938 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments, Monthly Reports ** Update on Designated Swimming Areas ** 4th of July Fireworks CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 611812815 City Council Regular Agenda AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING June 23, 2015 I, Virginia Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do affirm that a copy of the agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 8 Printed on 611812015 CITY 01= LA�L LSI E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, will hold a public hearing on June 23, 2015, at the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center, 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California, 92530, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following related item: Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 and Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02: A request to amend a previously approved Specific plan to permit two new residential product types and accompanying design modifications. Product type 1 is a two story single family detached residential unitwith alley - loaded garage access, with units fronting on shared green space. Product type 2 is a single family detached residential unit, grouped into sets of four (4) units surrounding a centralized driveway. In addition the applicant has requested design review of production units that are consistent with the modified specific plan. The project is generally located at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and is specifically referred to as Assessor Parcel Numbers: 379-050-034 and 379-050006. Pursuant to the California environmental quality act (CEQA), the City proposes to adopt an addendum to a mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. Staff has found that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment with implementation of required mitigation measures. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are hereby invited to attend this public hearing to present written information, express opinions or otherwise present evidence in the above matters. If you wish to legally challenge any action taken by the City on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City prior to or at the public hearing. FURTHER INFORMATION on this item may be obtained by contacting Justin Kirk, Senior Planner in the Planning Division at (951) 674-3124, ext. 284. All agenda materials are available for review at City Hall and on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Dated: June 4, 201 Yirhinio JJ Bloom, City Clerk Posted at City Hall on June 4, 2015 Published in the Press Enterprise on June 10, 2015 1 .4L5IOF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve 2015 Legislative Platform and Legislative Program Policy and Procedures Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the 2015 Legislative Platform and Legislative Program Policy and Procedures. Discussion The Legislative Platform ("Platform") and Legislative Program ("Program") are coming before the City Council for consideration at the request of Mayor Manos. The Platform is a compilation of general policy statements and City -specific policy statements. The general policy statements reflect commonly -accepted positions on matters pertaining to local governance of cities in the State of California. The City -specific policy statements reflect positions that the City has directly and collectively taken in the past. All policy statements in the Platform are consistent with the policies outlined in the City's governing documents (i.e., General Plan, Specific Plan, Parks Master Plan, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, etc.) The Platform was developed using legislative positions taken by the City Council, a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities and National League of Cities, input from the City Council and staff, research of current law and pending legislation, and discussions with local legislative staff and the City's legislative advocates. The Program outlines a detailed and streamlined process through which the City Council, staff and the City's legislative advocates can act in a timely manner in response to legislative proposals. The Platform will be adopted by the City Council and will be updated to reflect legislative changes. Prepared By: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved By: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: Legislative Platform Legislative Program Policy and Procedures CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2015 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM The Legislative Platform is a tool to protect and promote the City's interests on priority issues and legislative/regulatory matters that may impact the City at the state and federal level. The guiding principles and policy statements below allow City staff and legislative advocates to address legislative and regulatory issues in a timely and directed manner, without precluding City Council consideration of additional legislative matters arising throughout the year. This platform supplements existing City Council established goals and policies in various documents including the City's General Plan. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Preservation of Local Control Support measures that preserve and protect the City's general law powers and duties to enact legislation and policy direction concerning local affairs. Oppose measures that preempt local authority. Promotion of Fiscal Stability Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, and financial independence. Support measures that preserve and promote the City's revenue base. Oppose measures that mandate costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefit. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the county, state or federal government, without offsetting benefit. III. Support Funding Opportunities Support measures that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding including competitive grants and other funding programs. Support measures that promote dedicated funding streams at the regional, state and federal levels allowing the City to maximize local revenues, offset and leverage capital expenditures, and maintain City goals and standards. POLICY STATEMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES General Area of Review: Elections, Ralph M. Brown Act, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act, conflict of interest, insurance, tort reform and open and transparent government. General Policy Statements: Supports legislation that recognizes the need to conduct the public's business in public. Support legislation to allow alternative methods of meeting public notice requirements and enhancing them through the use of cost effective and innovative, technology friendly methods of communication. Support legislation to improve and streamline the Political Reform Act and its implementation through regulations. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding to create a sustainable and stable water supply, encourage conservation of water resources and reduce urban runoff pollution. • Support legislation and funding for renewable energy and advanced technologies that reduce energy use while providing a public benefit that is greater than the cost of compliance. • Support legislation and funding for local government energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. • Support legislation and funding for recyclable materials markets while maintaining local authority and flexibility to regulate solid waste and recyclables. HOUSING COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT General Area of Review: Land use, development, annexation and incorporation, building standards, economic development, redevelopment and enterprise zones, mobile home and sign regulations. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding to strengthen the capability of local agencies to prepare, adopt and implement plans for responsible growth, development, zoning, and annexations. • Support legislation and funding for the adoption of effective state building codes to promote community building safety and mitigation of natural hazards. • Support legislation and funding for the adoption of effective and clear green building standards in the California Building Code while providing a public benefit that is greater than the cost of compliance. • Support legislation and funding programs that promotes the development and enhancement of safe, affordable, and accessible housing within the City for all economic segments of the population. • Support legislation and funding for improvements to housing element law to provide clear processes and flexibility to allow regional cooperation and establish realistic housing goals and performance standards. • Support legislation that promotes the fair and effective distribution of State infrastructure bond funds consistent with the needs of diverse local cities. • Support funding mechanisms that encourage and facilitate infrastructure development and economic development. • Support legislation that streamlines the redevelopment dissolution process with consistency and equitability. • Support legislation to retain existing fees on telecommunications services and for public, educational and governmental channels. • Oppose legislation to restrict the authority of cities to zone and plan for the deployment of telecommunications infrastructure. Support legislation that promotes the ability of cities to maintain and manage the public right-of-way and receive compensation for its use. • Support legislation and funding for Urban Area Security Initiative ("UASI") and other funding initiatives administered by the Department of Homeland Security to enhance the City's ability to respond to regional or national threats. • Support legislation and funding to secure adequate frequencies and communications systems for multi -jurisdictional connectivity for public safety and protect the frequencies from intrusion. • Support legislation to increase Emergency Management Performance grant funding retaining flexibility in use of funds for emergency preparedness training, disaster events and disaster communication efforts. • Support legislation and funding to treat and assist the needs of at -risk juvenile offenders and juveniles placed on court-ordered formal probation. • Support legislation and funding for programs that protect youth from tobacco, alcohol and drug use, and related prevention and intervention programs including gang prevention and after-school programs. REVENUE AND TAXATION General Area of Review: Finance administration, taxation reform, general and special revenue and revenue sources at the federal, state and local levels. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation and funding for the preservation and enhancement of the City's ability to generate and retain sales and use tax revenue, and local point-of-sale revenue allocations. • Oppose legislation to reduce or remove tax-exempt status of municipal bonds. • Oppose legislation to alter the manner by which transient occupancy taxes are calculated and collected to the City's detriment. • Support legislation and funding that preserves and enhances a positive business climate and maintains and grows the business tax base. TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS General Area of Review: Transportation, construction, telecommunications and general public works related areas. General Policy Statements: • Support legislation to ensure the City receives its fair share of transportation revenue and increase funding for local transportation and transit programs and projects. • Support legislation to protect dedicated transportation -related tax revenues and enhance the ability of local agencies to finance local transportation programs and facilities, including the gas tax and bond funds. • Support legislation that gives priority to self-help and "super" self-help counties when allocating bond funding and other transportation funding mechanisms. • Support legislation to improve access and funding to public transportation. • Support legislation and funding mechanisms that support and encourage the use of transit and non -motorized transportation. LAKE Oi�'��,LSIRORf DREAM L.9-1 RFMt REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve designation of Mayoras City Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayor as the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 — October 2, 2015 in San Jose. Discussion The League of California Cities will be holding its Annual Conference on September 30 through October 2, 2015, in San Jose, California this year. Numerous legislative bills that affect cities are discussed and voted on at this conference. Mayor Manos is appointed to the League's Legislative Policy Committee and as such will be attending this Conference. Therefore, it is requested that the Council vote to authorize the Mayor to be the City's voting delegate at this conference. Attached is the notification from the League advising of the requirement for Council action in this regard. Prepared By: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved By: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: League of California Cities Annual Conference Voting Delegate 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 LEAGUE Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 OF CALI FORN 1A www.cacities.org CITIES Council Action Advised by July 31, 2015 EC E I V E D JUN - 8 2015 May 29, 2015 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 30 — October 2, San Jose The League's 2015Annual Conference is scheduled for September 30 -w- October 2 in San Jose. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assembly), scheduled for noon on Friday, October 2, at the San Jose Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Friday, September 18, 2015. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the votina deleizate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or cijy manager alone. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacities.or . In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the CrITFA )c Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2015 Annual Conference One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Fonn provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Conunittee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2015 Annual Conference One City One Vote,. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. Registering with the Credentials Conunittee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. Ll AG�)tF C�IIII.S May 29, 2015 1400 K Street, Suite 400 . Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 t=ax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Council Action Advised by July 31, 201 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES _._ , League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 30 — October 2, Sam Jose The League's 2015Aunual Conference is scheduled for September 30 --- October 2 in San Jose. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assemblv), scheduled for noon on Friday, October 2, at the San Jose Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action oil resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Amoral Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please Complete the attacked Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no Inter than Friday, September 18, 2015. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting, process at the Annual Business Meeting. Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a-c�(a))f tlnc council resolufron that t;eflects the council action talon �,i ha_v our c rty dcrk orn-nay r si the f®m affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that dcsianatintr the gotinr_ dela ate and alternates most be done i city council action and cannot he a complrshl-individl cmofthenayoac.1_or_city lnana >er alone:. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. 'ro register for the conference, please go to our website: w ww c aulacs.olg. In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the -over- �LEAGUE - or CAHroliN IA CITIES 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE+', FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, September 18, 2015. Forces not sent. by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by lice council. 1'1escse note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker oil their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VO'T'ING RELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: 1 affirm that: the information provided reflects action by tine city council to designate lite voting delegate and alternate(s). Name: E -Mail Mayor or City Clerk _ ____ Phone: (circle one) (signa(uro) Date: ------- --- Please complete and return by Friday, September 18, 2015 League of California Cities ATTN: Kayla Gibson 1400 K Street, 4a' Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 FAX: (916) 658-8240 137 -mail: kgibsou(c�cacities.org (916) 658-8247 w N "O T x L m m °7 D m --I o(D�NNa�� ��o-po W z= m°- (D (DW�'�o(D N o = ZCD D -U 0n fl- ai p' -o. o O N v (D O (D N N � N C O p 2 < (D (D U1 3 N O= -O d p N N m ,�., .O+ .. C x '�..�-. (D N (-D3 O A m o'o rn� N' Z ort � >W W <. d Z = m O O N O_ Co (D �U � N N D N (D z (D (D O 0 c� 3N p 0 -�� O v — (D � -N b o m z > > 3 > cr CD m v 0 0 N N W M 0 9Wo 0 3 0 0 0 z rz 3 s`, c CD •m .. v= o m 0) Da O A z _ 3 m ar- CD c l< N O K =' v= o 1 00> c, O W 3 n A O) W C- c z m N W N O O D z D m cn n D z D O m D z v m 9 W m ch O T m n n O c z n F 2 O z O D 03 r m O X m v O -I O n 0 O c z n r - oco -Di o L m m n --I C- c z m N W N O O D z D m cn n D z D O m D z v m 9 W m ch O T m n n O c z n F 2 O z O D 03 r m O X m v O -I O n 0 O c z n r - a N O N n 0 C z v m m r 0 m z v m v D m z n> D -o r xv_ :P A v o y CD Co � GNC) °° N N Q N � Q>3 3 -I 0 G)nv O -1 0 O o (p -O o -� 3 p O D Cn N co 7 o a O N (D D° �mo.�3-a O= p 7 o�0m om���3 Q as N .N-. C O_ < O A N O 3 T (D c n(°i,�c-nW O DJ < M (D O. co p Cl)(n 0 0' -a— 0. � 0 � � v y Q Q CO W � iD C-) m °1 ' � -, N w> N O 0 < O X N (D O -.O 3 (D (n (D .2 rn a (D O f/1 C (D Q a N N (D av CD 3 v O (D rr N N W "�-3 N N r' c N (D z (D p o W _nomA�m (D � '<Dw�� N 3 O N m (n (D > (D D°°�m 3 0°—�� � 03 o_m o Oc N c � n � N N c � � c m � (D (D -� — �(oa z 3 Cn _ O c° (D W Al = (D �. < D o Q m o< n. N a - C7 o(D(D P 3 w° co < O OFD 3 p N _ O N N N (ZD (D N � (D (D X O (l -6 __ _° z c C7 N N O T7 ° cn o �' 0 0 0-, n N n' (D N "30 (° cn O (n 00 N J N O O (D x 6 J ° z C N v v 0 0 N � N � � D o A N O 3 W O Z C 3 v CD C m N A Cn W S v� o w m l< � Do � � N Z c 3 m 7 0 C v, N W O (O S o � m l< Da A � � J a N O N n 0 C z v m m r 0 m z v m v D m z -0c� C G)Z z M wWS O N '� T °ic,m 0 A 9 n A a C CD C��7Dm� v, ZD n'o5'o W 9 -WW vN:ilN� LLo o(D C��a (D (D o-°�o0QO� o Nn� m O� 3 a m ° � n (D ° o - '.^. (D _C O° N d 0 O N :90-u O N o N O O x 'AO ° (D O CD N -QO �_'p O (D (D p.(D _O W O �;'(D C7 Z pD oSN 3° ° D O .gy3-0 m `< D= —m �o zMoD m <��N°D v —fn Ol N= n3 a n mD .m o N n g o o° O N N ._-•. (D rn 0 . Q (D c (D a m 0 N N n' rn m ° n3 '< ° -� 3 �cr�+mA cnr gm m o .-• C) o0Z .o O (D n -U 3 (D N (D (D (D .Z7 ca U -O n �, O (D = o. N N . . ( bCL -6 O< 'D �. O O _ ,_• N Cn D '' (� - o o (D 'N-' O D N N A(D < A O '.Y ° o _. 0(� �Cn0 Z _° z 5 'O ci N O N a D ° m O__O (on o 2 a__0) m' o (D r _ v'w o o.N D —WX m n WF'M n < 0 ° N z C 3 C7 (D m O o N N D 3 z c 3 c m S z o 0) `< Do 3 K N Z G 3 � N C � fll < .r S O o N `< .1 D o 3 3 A -0c� C G)Z z M wWS O N '� T °ic,m 0 A 9 -<7aN m W m-uT C)o -n -nT co 03-0IM % w CD 0 C O m FD Q 0 m m C C. Q, C 0 o n — v .Z7 m i r v w m nzo = aZm ai w Cn0a� n o -.°O 3 tU D. m N N -O o m 'O => N N c 3 N cD N o o f. m zzlA —(D = (D m (D D 'o �Z_. m < n -0 (D (D o o_= m o'z �n g (D3 p = o� yo c v(D a) m y o m n O ET v m « 3 n n— r m< o 0 0'o = p ° 2 m m ET�: m° N.O o o 0 .O+ O 3 (D � N F ND O n Q< _. O" N= o N � 3 1n o'm(D3�< o m r o -O < O z N o.D( v ------- -------- -- o O- m x < o�m � gin zy -oN C. y N z CD 0 m asp p (D o o m w A a a mCD �o`o- m o (Dn u W M� 0 (D C c ID N (D CD N 3 O N G z c N _ O A 41 O 3 00 W NO) N-� N ago (ten N W N A J m A 0) W CT O A (0 J (D O (O A N 06) 0 0 �co N) 69 N c of c A c O D N (0 N 0) 01 0) 91 (0 mCY) ) A o 00 00 = W = 0 N 41 c0 Z C 3 m o sr- A W CD y A N J W (DAA A _ W O 0000 O d) J A(n c0 W 0 O A W W .+• co A (T N W (O v= cfl w v Fn O _ v G A < N G Efl N o [n N cwcwco Do A W c0 N JN J41 O 3 i coal w O W W =W=M—N W U OAo (WD z C 3 m CD r- 0) 0) m N J N J w W W W co w O N N -+ O co (P c0 07 D7 0) J v0 n N O G v ,bq�EA O c D 0 69 Oi W W W N O 3 i W (0 J OD = O O-4 W O w MR 0 0 m c}§ m 3 m> q/ z 0 p g a g g z= z« >> \ 0 m j > > \ ( \ \ \ @$ / j > m 2 a e\ m § e c 2 = _ / o 0 j ° \ 0 0 \ 0 > \ \ \ m> o a z m= 0 > = m z / § § / \ ( § ° ° 0 / \ � \ } \ ƒ / \ » / / \ e % m S m ( \ / / \ / } \ > F \ ( � \ z \ \ = j m 0 % o m 0 3 o® 0 2 0*§ 0 % % o z z \ � o / \ ) \ o Q e m 7 2* 0 7 z\ 2 § m --4 w z i ) / / _ § « > / z = s e m J e o e K 0§/ o§\ m Q Q Q z z% m w 2 ® » ® > ( » m c m § > > m m m a 6 \.{ 2 M ° » a m = ^ { > m z ) / ) / z \ a § ) \ ( ® m~ A»® 2 m C° 0 0 9 ) 0 m§> f 0 0\ 0 m# m 9 m = s z § \ A z 0 >2■q mM§§ al C: kQ�§ cn"q« °3m ■M �o 9-0 <m \m a ) z ¥ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Grant Yates, City Manager FROM: Johnathan O. Skinner, Community Services Director DATE: June 16, 2015 SUBJECT: Community Services Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Vicky Saavedra, Community Services Office Specialist II. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The following provides a summary of the Community Services Department's programs, activities and events for May 2015. VOLUNTEERS We are currently recruiting clerical volunteers for the following departments; Public Works, Engineering, Human Resources and Community Services. The Community Services Department utilized a total of 8 volunteers for the Pet Walk, which was held on Saturday, May 9th. The current total of volunteer applications submitted this year is 35, which include 8 adults and 27 youths. COMMUNITY CENTER The Community Services Department, specifically Recreation Classes saw consistent and increased participation in May for all classes. May brings us to the two month mark for the new online registration and reservation system, REC1. The program has continues to work very well and meet the needs of our department. It has made online registrations and reservations easier and free. Since April we have seen steady growth in the number of online transactions; online registrations and reservations. Website registrations account for 25% of all transactions. The department welcomes a great mix of returning lifeguards and new hires for the summer aquatic program. We completed training on May 30th in anticipation for a June start. The Lake Elsinore Hispanic Community or the "Hispanica Communidad de Lake Elsinore" celebrated the Senate Bill to allow undocumented residents to obtain a driver's license on May 30th at the Community Center with 200 people in attendance. SENIOR CENTER The nutrition program continued providing breakfast to take home for each lunch participant. Seniors are thrilled and the attendance continues to increase. On May 8th, a total of 13 seniors enjoyed their lunch as they attended a trip to Benedict Castle in Riverside. They enjoyed a tour of the California Cultural Heritage Landmark. The second trip to the Graber Olive House in Ontario on May 18th was enjoyed by 12 seniors. They enjoyed a guided tour, a sack lunch and visited the museum and gift shops. The Riverside County Health Department did their annual inspection on May 18th. Once again we received an "A" rating. Prime Care offered a free Lung Function Screening on May 19th, which 26 seniors took advantage of. The American Lung Association had 20 seniors attend their workshop, which provided information on respiratory conditions and provided many resources to assist those who suffer from any If those conditions. The Grossman Burn Center and the Grossman Burn Foundation provided a very helpful presentation on May 201h. Attendees left with great resources and gifts to help prevent from getting burned. The seniors went on a trip to Harrah's Casino on May 28th. The trip was a success with 42 participants. The trip included $10 of free play for each participant. Three "Movies Days" were offered to the seniors on May 1 st, 6th and 29th. They enjoyed free popcorn and drinks while watching; "Must Love Dogs", "We Bought a Zoo" and "The Skeleton Key." Services provided this month included Notary, Mobile Fresh, Legal Advice, RTA Bus Pass Sales, bread distribution, haircuts, Blood Pressure Clinic and Health Insurance Counseling. SPECIAL EVENTS The Community Services Department hosted their 4th annual Pet Walk event on May 9th. It was held in Parking Lot B/Levee of the Diamond Stadium with 300 people in attendance. The event consisted of a mile and half and 14 pet related vendors such as George's Pet Sitting, Lake Elsinore Animal Hospital and Animal Friends of Valley. The first 150 participants received a Pet Walk Bandana that featured our new pet logo. On the walk, participants were able to collect raffle tickets for the drawing held at the end of the event. With over 20 sponsors, staff was able to raffle off great prizes. On May 17'h, the Eibach Honda Car Meet returned for their 31d year at the Diamond Stadium. This event continues to grow each year with 8,000 people in attendance. People from all over the Inland Empire meet yearly and show off their unique cars. This event features music, food and merchandise vendor as well as a beer and garden. Lucas Oil returned for their 2nd national race for the series at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park on May 29th and 30th. There was over 5,000 spectators that were able to enjoy competitive races, a variety of food vendors, PIT access and merchandise booths. SKATE PARK The total attendance at the McVicker Skate Park for the month of May was 501. The skate park had a total of 5 rentals and 30 new waivers forms filled out. The McVicker skaters are excited about the new Serenity Skate Park opening this summer. Skate 147 Scooter 217 BMX 137 LALAGUNA In March 2015, City Council approved termination of the Agreement with Pyramid Enterprise, Inc. for the operations of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. Staff began conversations with William's Bait, Tackle and Boat Rental for Campground Operation. Campground transition will take place on June 1 st. An interim agreement for operations was approved by City Council in May, with a detailed Agreement to the Council in June. Staff continues to work through the transition with Pyramid Enterprise. C] -ry o 1 � L1-lItE LSINC i3\: IJ IiFAM [x, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 24, 2015 SUBJECT: MONTHLY PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY JUNE 2015 Public Works Street Maintenance May June Pot Hole Repairs 268 163 Graffiti Removal 160 79 Storm Drains Cleaned 17 15 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 79 42 Signs Installed 2 1 Sign Repairs 46 37 Sidewalk Repairs (Square Ft) 1127 0 Curb & Gutter Repairs (Linear Ft) 0 0 Removed Illegal Signs 75 125 Area Sprayed With Herbicide (in acres) 0 12.5 Shopping Carts Pick -Ups 67 102 Trimmed Trees Various Locations 32 3 Drain Inspections 1 15 Removal of Road Hazards 24 9 Heatwurx Repair Units 0 2400 Vehicle Maintenance Vehicle Repairs 10 14 Vehicle Service 5 8 Alignments 0 0 Tire Installation & Repairs 17 12 Small Equipment Repairs 8 5 Service Calls 17 12 Mufflers & Tailpipes 0 0 Body Shop Repairs 0 0 Vehicle Maintenance Trailers Repaired 9 7 Batteries & Jump Starts 5 7 Boat Repairs 16 14 Heavy Equipment Repairs 14 16 Vehicle Maintenance Program (Fleet 2000) 0 0 Weed Abatement Lots Cleaned 0 20 City Lots Cleaned 15 12 Trees Trimmed 45 53 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 8 10 Replaced irrigation clocks 3 0 Shopping Carts Picked Up 0 1 Checked all Landscaped areas for Major Issues 0 2 Days Removed Illegal Signs 10 0 Facilities Division -Service Calls City Hall 29 16 P.W. Yard 28 4 Cultural Center 10 6 Community Center 8 7 Senior Center 11 18 Tiny Tots 1 0 Chamber Building 3 0 Station 85 1 1 Station 95 1 2 Station 97 4 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION ` PUBLIC COUNTER Research Requests 10 2 Plan Checks 4 5 Final Maps 1 1 Grading 1 4 Street Improvement 7 0 Development Review 4 4 Flood Plain Determination 3 4 Bond Release Requests 3 6 Oversize Transportation Permits 3 9 Encroachments Permit Applications 18 22 Encroachment Permit Traffic Issues 4 1 CIP UPDATE Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location Senior Center Sidewalk Senior 100% plans 100% Complete Project completed June Improvements Center completed 2015. Landscape Project No. 4424 improvements are under separate contract with EVMWD. Landscape improvements should begin sometime in October 2015 McVicker Dog Park McVicker Completed Project completed Project completed Fence Improvements Park November 2014 Project No. Z40000 Lakepoint Park Electrical Lakepoint Completed Project completed Project completed June Panel Park 2015 Project No.4414 Serenity Park- Skate Serenity Park 90% plans In progress Project under Zone complete construction Project No. 4419 Facilities Master Plan Citywide 85% Preparation of final Project underway. Data Project No. Z30000 complete report per contract collection completed. agreement Preparation of draft report under progress. Anticipated completion by July/August 2015 Parks Facilities Master Citywide 85% Preparation of final Project underway. Data Plan Complete report per contract collection completed. Project No. 4106 agreement. GHD preparing final report for Parks Facilities Master Plan. Anticipated completion by July/August 2015 CIP UPDATE Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location City Master Drainage Citywide In progress Proposed new district Plan Update boundaries under Project No. 120 review. Consultant meeting scheduled for June 22, 2015 User Fee Study Citywide In progress Fee study underway by Project No. Z30002 Willdan Engineering. Cost allocation study completed. Anticipated completion March/April 2015 Gunnerson Street Gunnerson 95% design Construction 100% Plan & Received Rehabilitation between completed anticipated for on 4/20/15. NEPA Project No. 4350 Lakeshore August 2015. environmental doc Drive and submitted to Caltrans for SR -74 review. Staff to submit RFA package to Caltrans for construction by 7/1/2015. RNV certification to Caltrans for review Collier Island Outlet Mall 80% Construction Per Developer Modification Phase I completed anticipated for Agreement, construction Project No. 4388 April/May 2015 improvements will be done by outlet mall City Monument Signs Lake Elsinore 100% 100% Completed Project completed May Project No. 4396 completed 2015 Third Street Drainage — Lake Elsinore 35% Prelim RFP for 100% PSE sent Phase 1 under out; proposals due Project No. 4296 review 6/16/2015. CIP UPDATE Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status Traffic Signal Installation Sage at 100% 100% completed Project completed Canyon Hills/Sage Road Canyon Hills completed Project No. 4368 Traffic Signal Installation Riverside Developer driven project Grand Avenue at Drive (HWY Riverside 74) @ Grand Project No. 4392 Ave and Riverside Dr. (HWY 74) @ Lakeside H. S. Slurry Seal Project Various 100% 100% completed Project completed Project No. Z10014 streets November 2015 citywide Pavement Management Citywide No design Construction Bid opening held on Program (Grind & plans anticipated for July 5/14/15. Staff received Overlay / R&R Phase 2) needed 2015 5 bids. Construction Project No. Z10008 contract awarded to Hardy & Harper. Construction Agreement is being executed Annual Pavement Citywide Preparation Anticipated completion Management Plan — of report. in July 2015. Project No. Z10005 No design 75% of the field survey needed is completed so far 1-15/Railroad Canyon 1-15 @ In progress PA&ED in progress. City Road Interchange Railroad Council Roundabout Improvements (PAED) Canyon Project progress update Project No. Z10016 Interchange conducted in March 2015. Anticipated PA&ED completion in December 2015 CIP UPDATE Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location _ Railroad Canyon/1-15 1-15 @ 100% plans Construction Contract Southbound Off Ramp Railroad completed awarded to Highland Deceleration Lane Canyon Construction, Inc. Project No. 4432 Interchange Project to begin sometime in July/August 2015 Main Street Interchange Being added to the Project No. Z10017 TUMF Network, being placed on the upcoming CIP to perform PSR, Needs to be improved by 2024. City to perform feasibility analysis of Main St. new interchange and Camino Del Norte Lake Inlet Channel --Cake inlet Survey conducted channel 5/27/2015; results due northwesterly week of 6/8/2015. from the Documentation for terminus of environmental San Jacinto permitting submittals lu River to be completed by Morton Street 6/26/2015 \ 2 7 { ƒ / 3 \ $ \ 7 f / / C3 $!e �a o= - §� g,o /��� \\ {\ \\j `> \} CD \- ( D CD @)( {°p % �mcn 9 4 f g - _ _ [3< _ © 07 ��/ / ^ - T�/ \®� ] / $ G ; C': _ \ \ \ \ \ / _ \ \\ %\§ /) 2\ .\ } /CD - \\ 0\ ` \_ _ \} Z K=CD -0 - ° 0 / \ \ \ {\ \\ 00 ^ k \ - \ / \\ \/ \ 0 `= \ - Z : , 3 ® \ » zy \ \3 § e «CD _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ < .) �CD (D 0< \ \ a (DD\ (CD _ : \ UT / \ _ * 7 a zT ® ` ` \ e _ CO \ \ \ \ \ 005 \ \ _ , $ 2 , e / / \ \zr \ \ \ 0 \ ® 0 w \�}�\�\�\\�/ I=D (\Em' _ \i " -- � / _ � � i ! 2 . . ® 0 w 7 I=D (\Em' _ \i " -- � / _ � � i ! § _ 2 . . EL .k � m . . . . . � � � J | ■ §/@ Tog : - arD E! �( �� 3 m \ \ \\ ( ` ƒ} \} ®}a . K 00 % \\ } Fn /( / 1 \ J W a Z a a v v AD � I a 9d v4 I'+ y ! I[ It u G l: 5 }} [ — 3 a � E$i n e C) 1 Cr op ' S UJ 3 i{ �� l (j V O z 0 d EE W T m m a m � O C -I 0 0 N J A J J N 0 0 -qN � o 9 y y m^ n n 1 m o.m0 m w o � � D N .y. -i$G�Nv032T nnati�d�� oNmom m a I a m .. m o m ' D I i z w a m 6 19" _ 0 N V) m 0 f 6 V) C. n 0 c 3 rF v 'a S11 rt 3 rr l'1 n r T H m m L] m A p o D n � N M O n N C d P� Y O � d C T + N C N � D o 3 3 n S � - T ] o y o 3 H m T - d > < � o 01 m m A m a N f=n S N a p ym W m c 7 1 C S N ET o H O K o a N m K - O O NO O O m 0 + n o = T m m OD 3 m 1 _ K o n 3 O D O D o E H O � D � 3 � v � � x < o G D t0 m 0 to m m O D � D � O G O C O O � O O N VI c o 3 I-` o W V>> OI N N O m v w 0 3 7 A I a 3 N O' m � W m � eT � '3 m d d M 01 y 7 N N a V o gV a t ,emffln m D T mW y d I 3 � D U OHO m m i 3 m I o 1 N�''�tDm Ha o I m I � C � 2 N m I � a a r v }} g o r N � i 4 F( D c F f A n el v i TT�LKy t iv, l.Jl G e [ e rye _1 1 4n r - t n Cj� s t1.7 F J Yt ILI .. ,u. _.,.,t. ._.... �. III m 0 m d� V a WE J G z N ci. n 0 c 3 rt T m v fD 13 Ol r�r 3 m 7 rt n a r T m X m h m. m a a lJ r v 1 a i 3ff fr' Y Fg li a Y r G f,, cw Jl �( i .3 (ro � Uk i re 11 5 k . i 3 f R 3 y � 3 1! i t m m 0 m 101Frii -3 Organization Represented: L S If10 DRI-AM EXI-RFMI, REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Please Print (-oil J Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CIT' OF L.A E -1 L IN R ,k DREAM EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name --j' ;i.. 1 ias &j,/ Please Print Organization Represented: € Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. — (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meetln : (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) fi Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF LAKE sl LSITJOP�E REAM E, 1l' 1U M I �TN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: k� e -7'- 0 �- _ L_ .. Organization Represented: my�� Address ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No Please Print V f, i 7�V / / Ls�� a� y Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beinnin of the meeting (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting- (Comments eetin -(Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF LAKS I L, IfiORE DREAM E �-DEME, M' REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: \'e Please Print Organization Represented: Addre No. I wish to address Agenda Item No ► I wish to comment on the following meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) q'sl -da Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) non-agendized item at the beginning of the ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Dat Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! crry C) 67 LAKE C'SWLS1R01KL- D ItLA,bt Name Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) hA (?,O erN)"� k i Kw '%�gy Address Please Print ys`i-row-�-j� Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. 13 . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) to. I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) w)--, 1,� Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Nory- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will ha4e approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! C f T Y O 1=-"` LAKE fil 11NLS1n0P-,E DREAM EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Pat Kilroy (Please Print) Organization Represented: (If any) - _ ) , loo-wts to comment on the following non ac�endized item(s) beginning of meeting: a, (Comments limited to 1 minute) City's Termination of Fire Protection & Paramedic Services at Downtown Fire Station -10. ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) City's Termination of Fire Protection & Paramedic Services at Downtown Fire Station -10. ► I wish to address Item No. E2 L180of this Agenda. (Comm is limited to 3 minutes) 5/23/2015 Date Address (optional) Phone The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OFLAKF-., 6_0 7 1 L S I f 10 B E � 1 OREAM E, rRE.M.E REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Plbase Print Organization Represented: ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. J4. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY L. L1110L IMM Organization Represented: DREAM EXTREMt REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. L7,. (comments limited to 3 minutes) 4(2, ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) D to The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated!