Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC & SA Regular Agenda Packet 04-28-2015RG Cit of Lake Elsinore LAKE 74-312RE.ONE Y (951)674-3124 PHONE Lill , r i_�cy11`�C...�I L CULTURAL CENTER —��.^r 183 N. MAIN STREET D0.4m. tr,rr,I1i1 LAKE ELSINORE, CA Regular Agenda 92530 City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN #389-461-003 Agency negotiator: City Manager Yates Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and Spectrum Services on Wireless Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APNs 371-040-019; 371-030-041; 371-030-038 (Summerly Golf Course) City Negotiator: City Manager Yates and City Attorney Leibold Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and E3 Advisors Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case) PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS Proclamation declaring May as Mental Health Month PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS —1 MINUTE behalf of Verizon (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and turn it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-544 Warrant List Dated April 16, 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on April 16, 2015. Attachments: City Staff Report 4-28-15 Warrant Summary City 04 16 15 Warrant List City 04 16 15 2) ID# 14-545 City Investment Report for March 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015. Attachments: City Investment Staff Report 2015-03.pdf City Investment Report 2015-03.pdf 3) ID# 14-546 Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 - An Application to Develop Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-029 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02, a Development of Eight Industrial Buildings Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. 2.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-030 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-031 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 for the Development of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Printed on 412312015 City Council 4) 5) 6) Attachments: Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 IDR 2014-02 -CC Staff Report4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 -Vicinity Map 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - Aerial Map 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - CC CEQA Resolution 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC MSHCP Resolution 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC Resolution 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC Conditions of Approval 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - Overall Site Plan - 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - Project Exhibits 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - Color Elevations BUILDING A & B 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 -Addendum 1 to MND 2003-04 4-28-15 1 DR 2014-02 - PC Staff Report 4-7-15 ID* 14-547 Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between Prostaff LLC and the City of Lake Elsinore. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of Ninety Five Thousand Dollars and no cents ($95,000.00) between ProStaff LLC and the City of Lake Elsinore for project consultant services on the Rosetta Canyon Park Phase II Project. Attachments, ProStaff 1st Amendment Staff Report ProStaff LLC 1st Amendment Professional Services Agmt 2015 Prostaff LLC Professional Service Agreeemnt ID# 14-548 Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee Annual CPI Adjustment Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the rate adjustment notification from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority as a result of their action taken on March 2, 2015. Attachments: mshcp rca rate Staff Report rca letter to city Agenda Item 11 Staff Report WRCRCA FEE 3-2-2015 ID# 14-549 Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute A Professional Service Agreement Between RJM Design Group and The City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Approve the Professional Services Agreement by and between RJM Design Group and the City of Lake Elsinore for landscape architecture, and engineering services related to schematic design, design development, and construction documents for two (2) parks in substantially the form and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 Attachments: Staff Report - RJM Professional Services Agreement for City Park and Yarboroi ATTACHMENT - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT RJM APRIL 16 20' ATTACHMENT - RJM SCOPE OF WORK - CITY PARK AND YARBOROUGH F 7) ID# 14-550 Application for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Funds (SB 821) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Authorize application for state funding available under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) SB 821 to receive FY 2015-16 TDA Article 3 allocation of $695,000. Attachments: SB821 MB DP SB 821 Rosetta Canyon Bike Lane Stripinq SB 821 Missing Link Sections 8) ID# 14-551 Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between HR Green, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($120,000.00) between HR Green, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore for engineering staffing and services. Attachments: HR GREEN 1st Amendment Staff Report F HRGREEN 1st Amendment Professional Services Agmt 2015 F HR Green Professional Services Agmt 2015 with Proposal (3) 9) ID# 14-552 Proposal for the City of Lake Elsinore to renew their Wildland Fire Protection Agreement with Cal Fire. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement with Cal Fire in the final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Wildland Fire Protection wfpaupdate final overview 10) ID# 14-553 Cinco De Mayo Event Approval for Municipal Code Waiver Recommendation: City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. Attachments: Staff Report - CINCO DE MAYO EVENT April 28 2015 PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) 11) ID# 14-554 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1334 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1334 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO, 2005-02 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN STREET. Attachments: Second reading of Ord 2015-1334 Spyglass Specific Plan Ordinance No. 2015-1334 Spyglass Amendment to Specific Plan 12) ID# 14-555 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1335 Regarding Public Skate Park Facilities Recommendation, It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1335, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 8.42 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PUBLIC SKATE PARK FACILITIES, Attachments, Staff Report -Second Reading of Skatepark Facilities Ordinance Ordinance No. 2015 - 1335 Ch 8 42 - Public Skate Park Facilities (Second Reac 13) ID# 14-556 Buenas Vibras Festival De Musica Approval For Municipal Code Waiver Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. Attachments: Staff Report - BUENAS VIBRAS FESTIVAL DE MUSICA April 28 2015 14) ID# 14-557 City Council Update on Revisions to the Weed Abatement Policy Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council provide direction for the FY 2015-16 Weed Abatement Program. Attachments: Staff Report Weed Abatement 2 Weed Abatement Ordinance No. 1135 Weed Abatement Guidelines.14 Weed Abatement Guidelines 15 2015 Weed Abatement Notice PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 15) ID# 14-558 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments: Monthlys CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 4/23/2015 - Lhl L ( , LSII10IU City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCY MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCYMEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION - None PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 Successor Agency Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and turn it into the Clerk. The Chair or Clerk will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless an Agency Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-542 Warrant List Dated April 16, 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated April 16, 2015. Attachments: SA RDA Staff Report 4-28-15 SA RDA Warrant summary 04 16 15 SA RDA Warrant List 04 16 15 2) ID# 14-543 Successor Agency Investment Report for March 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015, Attachments: SA RDA Investment Staff Report 2015-03.pdf SA RDA Investment Report 2013-03.pdf PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Successor Agency will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 4/23/2015 LA1�,E C,;LSIIYCaR-L- >�? Un. r,n,t•, tXY0.G.,r City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda City Council LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITYMANAGER Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN #389-461-003 Agency negotiator: City Manager Yates Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and Spectrum Services on behalf of Verizon Wireless Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APNs 371-040-019; 371-030-041; 371-030-038 (Summerly Golf Course) City Negotiator: City Manager Yates and City Attorney Leibold Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and E3 Advisors Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case) PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS Proclamation declaring May as Mental Health Month PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and tum it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) City or Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 4/23/2015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-544 Warrant List Dated April 16, 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on April 16, 2015. Attachments: City Staff Report 4-28-15 Warrant Summaryity041615 Warrant List City_04 16 15 2) ID# 14-545 City Investment Report for March 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015. Attachments: City Investment Staff Report 2015-03.pdf City_Inyestment Report 2015-03.pdf 3) ID# 14-546 Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 -An Application to Develop Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-029 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02, a Development of Eight Industrial Buildings Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. 2.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-030 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-031 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 for the Development of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Printed on 4/23/2015 City Council 4) 5) 6) Attachments: Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 IDR 2014-02 - CC Staff Report 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02- Vicinity Map 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - Aerial Map 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC CEQA Resolution 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC MSHCP Resolution 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - CC Resolution 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - CC Conditions of Approval 4-28-15 IDR 2014-02 - Overall Site Plan - 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - Project Exhibits 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - Color Elevations BUILDING A & B 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - Addendum 1 to MND 2003-04 4-28-15 OR 2014-02 - PC Staff Report 4-7-15 ID# 14-547 Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between Prostaff LLC and the City of Lake Elsinore. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of Ninety Five Thousand Dollars and no cents ($95,000.00) between Pro Staff LLC and the City of Lake Elsinore for project consultant services on the Rosetta Canyon Park Phase II Project. Attachments: Prostaff 1st Amendment Staff Report ProSlaff LLC 1st Amendment Professional Services Agmt 2015 Prostaff LLC Professional Service Agreeemnt ID# 14-548 Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee Annual CPI Adjustment Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the rate adjustment notification from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority as a result of their action taken on March 2, 2015. Attachments: mshcp rca rate Staff Report rca_letter.t0„city Agenda Item 11 Staff Report WRCRCA FEE 3-2-2015 ID# 14-549 Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute A Professional Service Agreement Between RJM Design Group and The City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Approve the Professional Services Agreement by and between RJM Design Group and the City of Lake Elsinore for landscape architecture, and engineering services related to schematic design, design development, and construction documents for two (2) parks in substantially the form and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 412312015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 Attachments: Staff Report - RJM Professional Services Agreement for City Park and YarboroL ATTACHMENT - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT RJM APRIL 16 20' ATTACHMENT - RJM SCOPE OF WORK - CITY PARK AND YARBOROUGH I 7) ID# 14-550 Application for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Funds (SB 821) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Authorize application for state funding available under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) SB 821 to receive FY 2015-16 TDA Article 3 allocation of $695,000. Attachments: SB821 MB DP SB 821 Rosetta Canyon Bike Lane -Strip inc SB. 821 Missina Link Sections 8) ID# 14-551 Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between HR Green, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($120,000.00) between HR Green, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore for engineering staffing and services. Attachments: HR GREEN tat Amendment Staff ReportF HRGREEN 1st Amendment Professional Services Admit 2015 F HR Green Professional Services Agmt 2015 with Proposal (3) 9) ID# 14-552 Proposal for the City of Lake Elsinore to renew their Wildland Fire Protection Agreement with Cal Fire. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement with Cal Fire in the final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Wildland Fire Protection wfpaupdate final overview 10) ID# 14-553 Cinco De Mayo Event Approval for Municipal Code Waiver Recommendation: City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. Attachments: Staff Report - CINCO DE MAYO EVENT April 28 2015 PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) 11) ID# 14-554 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1334 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Printed on 412312075 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1334 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN STREET, Attachments: Second readinaof Ord 2015-1334 Spyg lass�ecific,Plan Ordinance No. 2015-1334 Spyglass Amendment to Specific Plan 12) ID# 14-555 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1335 Regarding Public Skate Park Facilities Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1335, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 8.42 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PUBLIC SKATE PARK FACILITIES. Attachments: Staff Report - Second Reading of Skategark Facilities Ordinance Ordinance No. 2015 - 1335 Ch 8 42 -Public Skate Park Facilities (Second -Rea( 13) ID# 14-556 Buenas Vibras Festival De Musica Approval For Municipal Code Waiver Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. Attachments: Staff Report - BUENAS VIBRAS FESTIVAL DE MUSICA April 28 2015 14) ID# 14-557 City Council Update on Revisions to the Weed Abatement Policy Recommendation, Staff recommends City Council provide direction for the FY 2015-16 Weed Abatement Program. Attachments: Staff Report Weed Abatement 2 Weed Abatement Ordinance No. 1135 Weed Abatement Guidelines. 14 Weed Abatement Guidelines 15 2015 Weed Abatement Notice PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it in to the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 15) ID# 14-558 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments: Monthlys CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 Printed on 4/23/2015 City Council Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 4/23/2015 fel�l� � � tillti._�E Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 1) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-544 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 emv, lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/29/2015 C: I `I Y (,) I,,,lam, LAK E "k� LS I i 1.1..J 1 t 1)1k1:AM f',,gtlUE,X1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED APRIL 16, 2015 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on April 16, 2015. Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued since the prior warrant list. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II Reviewed By: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 4-16-15 APRIL 1b, 2015 PUN:D# 135 150 155 160 354 500 608 617 620 C9 ll'Y OF ]LAKE 'E.LSINOIR E WARRANT SUMMARY :1-UND DF.SCR'IP']`10N 'T'OTAL FUND $ 473,299.40 �S EDUCATION FUND 158.70 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND 60,031.06 D. 1 FUND 659.17 JND 7,500.00 SA RDA HOUSING COST RECOVERY D FUND RDA DEBT SERVICE FUND GRAND TOTAL $ 621,322.08 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 City 1 of 1 APRIL 16, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE WARRAN LIST CAIFCK## VENDOR NAM1, AMOUNT 121520 VOID -COASTAL DISTRIBUTING $ (4,024.85) 121553 VOID -LORENZ & JONES MARINE DIST _ (24.05) 121690 _ VOID-VERIZON WIRELESS (#11) (98.00)_ 121745 VOID REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY _ (1,500.00) 121696 ACOM SOLUTIONS 561.00 121697 ACTION GAS & WELDING SUPPLY -- - - -- 149.17 121698 ADAMS LANDSCAPING, INC. 11787.5-0 121699 ALPINE WATER 111.72 121700-121701 AMERICAN EXPRESS -CORP. PURCHASING 15455.63 121702 BERGERABAM INC. 660.37 121703 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS _ _ 215.00 121704 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 4,129.88 121705 COLONIAL LIFE 1,193.81 121706 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 30.00 121707 G&A CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 2,000.00 121708 GENERATOR SERVICES, INC. 1,47T64 121709 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES 215.10 121710 _ INLAND URGENT CARE, MEDICAL CORP. 76.00 121711 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. _ _ 14,075.53 121712 KJ SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING ----------- 121713 ----1,971.25 THE L.I.U. OF N.A. _ 5,113.60 121714 LEGAL SHIELD 1_55.40 121715 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN 33,240.27 121716 LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. 3,348.00 121717 LIUNA LOCAL 777 1,197.00 121718 LORENZ & JONES MARINE DIST 80.07 121719 M & M COURT REPORTERS, INC. _72_7.56 121720 LYNN MERRILL 1,370.00 121721 _ OTTE-BERKELEY GROUPIE, INC. 13,835.00 121722 PACIFIC AGGREGATES _ _ 73.93 121723 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE _ 355.20 121724 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS, INC. 50.76 121725 REC1 250.00 121726 ROW TRAFFIC SAFETY, INC 21.06 121727-121733 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 11,783.42 121734 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 2,055.60 121735 TIME WARNER CABLE 583.75 121736 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 63.68 121737 UNITED WAY - INLAND VALLEY ------------ 90.00 121738-121740 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 2,779.63 121741 VERIZON WIRELESS (#11) 21.98 121742 VERIZON WIRELESS (#9) _ - 76.02 121743 _ _ _ _ VISION SERVICE PLAN 1,387.66 121744 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 88,730.00 121745 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1,500.00 121746 RIVERSIDECOUNTY CLERK 50.00 121747 ABC BOUNCE COMPANY 1,000.00 121748 CATHERYNE BARROZO 956.69 121749 BOYS &GIRLS CLUB 7,500.00 121750 CA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION _ 628.00 121751 CALIFORNIA STATE DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 158.70 121752 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 908.70 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 City 1 OF 3 APRIL 16, 20;15 C 1[CK# 121753 CE 121754 CC 121755 DE 121756 DII 12_1 121 121 C11;I'Y OF LAKE F1311NORE VLNDOR NAME ENT, INC. IRKS DESIGN GROUP F CONSERVATION UAL KAIN I INU MARGARET ANN DRAKE ANGELICA GONZALEZ GREAT AMERICAFINANCIAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL WATER SKI RACES JOE'S HARDWARE STEVE KARVELOT LYNUA IJAKK6 AGILI I Y 121765 MURRIETA CHAMBER OF ( 121766 ORKIN, INC. 121767-121769 PETTY CASH ---___ 121770 .. --- ._..- KAREN PING 121771 GUSTAVO POLETTI _._----- 121772 --- -----_.___. SMART &FINAL 121773 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC. 121774 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 121775 VARSITY GYMNASTICS, LLC 121776 VENUS PRINTING 121777VI TECHNOLOGY SOLUTI _ 121778 _SION _ A BETTER PARTY 121779 ABOVE ALL NAMES CONSTRU 121780 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 121781 AWTHENTIK GRAPHICS 121782 BANK OF AMERICA, CITY 121783 BANK OF AMERICA, CITY 121784 _ BANK OF AMERICA, CITY 121785 BANK OF- AMERICA, CITY 121786 BERGERINC. _ABAM 121787 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 121788 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIVE 121789 121790 121791 121792 121793 121794 CALIFORNIA JPIA CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. CENTURYLINK COASTAL DISTRIBUTING CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC LIANE CUMMINGS INC. 121795 DATA QUICK INFORMATION SYSTEMS, IN 121796 CAROLS DONAHOE AIC.P. 121797-121798 E. V. M. W. D. 121799 _ ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF CO CA 121800 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 121801 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 121802 FILARSKY &WATT, LLP 121803 HAZZARD BACKFLOW CO 121804 C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 121805 INLAND EMPIRE TOURISM COUNCIL 121806 IRON MOUNTAIN, INC. 121807 MAILFINANCE INC 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 City 2 OF 3 WARRAN,r LIST AMOUNT 1 55.86 1,425.00 156.00 155.25 285.51 1,000.00 102.59 112.50 1,000.00 50.00 91.69 794.45 350.00 142.50 56.61 75.00 1,412.95 100.73 436.35 1,393.86 1,995.00 1,727.88 3,114.03 375.00 4,024 475 53 130.50 3,862.50 7.405.45 APRIL 16, 2015 CITY OF ILAKE ELSINORE CH1;C'KII VIINI DORNAME 121809 121810 121811 121812 121813 _ 121814 121815 121816 121817-121821 121822 121823 - 121824 121825 121826 121827---- 121828 121829 JOIN IN IFGR rcn nllVL1 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE PRODUCTION VIDEO PYRO-SPECTACULARS RH CONSULTING _ RIVERSIDE COUNTY INFORP SHRED-IT_USA, LLC SONSRAY MACHINERY, LLC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GA STAPLES ADVANTAGE STEWART TITLE OF CALIFO TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS TIME WARNER CABLE TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED WARRAJN 7' Lls,'r AMOUN F 2_03.11 998.80 187.5_0 40.00 975.00 1.286.04 531.50 360.22 839.42 350_.00 331.06 239 12 625.00 77.88 121830 VCS ENVIRONMENTAL 1,080.00 121831 VENUS PRINTING _ _ _ _ 6.48 121832 VERIZON - INTERNET 140.00 121833 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 313.51 121834 VERIZON WIRELESS (#1) _ 443.97_ 121835 VERIZON WIRELESS (#10) _ 64.90 _ 121836 VERIZON WIRELESS (#2) _ 121.60 121837 VERIZON WIRELESS_(#3) 20547 121838 VERIZON WIRELESS (#4) - 2918.83 - 121839 VERIZON WIRELESS (#5) _ 202.98 121840 VIEVU, LLC 672.00 WARRANT TOTAL 382,845.34 GRAND TOTAL $ 621,322.08 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 City 3 OF 3 �i kCs (rr4lrt l„�I Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 2) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-545 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake -elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 Printed on 4/23/2095 CITY OP ins LADE Cog LSINORE �=� DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT— MARCH 2015 Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015. Discussion The Investment Report is a listing of all funds invested for the City as of the date shown on the report. Prepared By: Nancy L. Lassey Finance Administrator Approved By: Jason P. Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Investment Report for March 2015 CITY OF LADE LSINOR E DREAM EXTREME. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT MARCH 2015 INVESTMENTS City Local Agency Investment Fund CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - 13,118,042 City CAMP Investments: INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS CAMP Pool Account 57,234 - AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 12,036,071 - - 12,036,071 BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANG BOOK ACTIVE ACCOUNTS BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE 8,763,808 - - 8,763,808 Bank of America - General $ 4,324,371 $ 18,947 $ (1,554,762) $ 2,788,556 Bank of America - Payroll 13,780 - (921) 12,859 Bank of America - Flex Benefit 44,647 - - 44,647 Total Active Accounts 4,382,799 18,947 (1,555,684) 2,846,062 INVESTMENTS City Local Agency Investment Fund 13,118,042 - - 13,118,042 City CAMP Investments: CAMP Pool Account 57,234 - - 57,234 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 12,036,071 - - 12,036,071 Municipal Bond / Note 290,464 - - 290,464 Federal Agency Bond / Note 7,154,301 - - 7,154,301 Corporate Note 8,763,808 - - 8,763,808 Certificate of Deposit 1,025,000 - - 1,025,000 Housing CAMP Investments - Housing CAMP Pool Account 21,958 - - 21,958 Housing U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes 2,147,697 - - 2,147,697 Housing Municipal Bond / Notes 30,084 - - 30,084 Housing Federal Agency Bond / Notes 1,229,087 - - 1,229,087 Housing Corporate Notes 1,452,808 - - 1,452,808 Housing Certificate of Deposit 100,000 100,000 Sub -total Investments 47,426,554 - - 47,426,554 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (LAIF) 3,406 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (CAMP General) (72,383) Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (CAMP Housing) (29,370) Total Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 per GASB 31 (98,347) Total Investments 47,328,207 $ 51,711,006 $ Cashier Drawers #1 & #2 City of Lake Elsinore Petty Cash Fund TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS 3,406 (72,383) (29,370) (98,347) - 47,328,207 18,947 $ (1,555,684) $ 50,174,269 300 1,000 $ 50,175.569 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on November 12, 2013. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Jason P. Simpson April 15, 2015 Director of Administrative Services Date CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND TRANSACTION SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH ENDING MARCH 31, 2015 Interest Rate Purchase Date 0.278% Daily Beginning Balance Net Increase/(Decrease) $ 16,418,042 $ (3,300,000) Maturity Rate 24 -Hour Ending Balance 13,118, 042 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 FUND NO FUND NAME AMOUNT 100 General Fund $ 9,398,668 101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 64,650 104 Traffic Offender Fund 79,114 106 Affordable Housing In Lieu Fund 2,210,013 107 Developer Agreement Revenue 1,052,241 110 State Gas Tax Fund 1,268,250 112 Transportation Fund 1,610,079 114 SB1186 CAS Program Fund 3,488 115 Traffic Safety Fund 205,886 116 City Hall -Public Works DIF Fund 901,277 117 Community Center DIF Fund 382,873 118 Lake Side Facility DIF Fund 717,539 120 Camino Del Norte DIF 36,272 135 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Fund - Dist. No. 1 260,708 140 Geothermal Fund 19,517 160 PEG Grant Fund 63,861 201 Street C.I.P. Fund 96 204 Signal C.I.P. Fund 5,061 205 Traffic Impact Fee Fund 3,252,128 211 Storm Drain C.I.P. Fund 3,516,908 221 Quimby Park C.I.P. Fund 361,759 231 Library C.I.P. Fund 1,610,084 254 AD 89-1 Railroad Canyon Rd. Improvement Fund 126,253 332 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area B, Summerly 56,256 342 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite Service Fund 302 344 CFD 2005-2 Alberhill Ranch Services Fund 53,911 345 CFD 2003-2S Improvement Area D, Canyon Hills 188,723 346 CFD 2014-1 Southshore Debt Service Fund 61,618 347 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area A, Summerly 44,663 348 CFD 2003-2 Improvement Area C, Canyon Hills 62,787 349 CFD 88-3 (20136) Debt Service Fund 1,456,174 350 CFD 98-1 Summerhill Debt Service Fund 436,979 352 AD 86-1 Debt Service Fund 628,242 354 CFD 90-2 Successor RDA Debt Service Fund 838,452 356 AD 90-1A Debt Service Fund 41,210 357 CFD 2003-2 Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 219,566 366 CFD 2005-6 City Center Townhomes Debt Service Fund 52,633 367 CFD 2005-3 Summerly Debt Service Fund 76,233 368 CFD 2006-2 Viscaya Debt Service Fund 130,886 369 CFD 2004-3 Area 1 Rosetta Canyon Debt Service Fund 101,795 371 CFD 2005-1 Serenity Debt Service Fund 133,191 372 CFD 2005-2 Alberhill Ranch Debt Service Fund 413,407 373 CFD 2005-5 Wasson Canyon Debt Service Fund 55,621 1 of 2 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 FUND NO FUND NAME AMOUNT 374 CFD 2005-4 Lakeview Villas Debt Service Fund 39,945 375 CFD 2006-4 Tract No. 30698 & 32129 Debt Service Fund 12,361 376 CFD 2006-3 La Strada Debt Service Fund 17,361 377 CFD 2006-6 Tessara Debt Service Fund 9,979 378 CFD 2006-8 Tract No. 31957 Debt Service Fund 41,791 382 CFD 2006-9 Trieste Debt Service Fund 31,345 384 CFD 2003-2 Area B Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 278,450 385 CFD 2004-3 Area 2 Rosetta Canyon Debt Service Fund 382,298 386 CFD 2007-4 Mekenna Debt Service Fund 3,923 387 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite Debt Service Fund 49,108 388 CFD 2007-6 Holiday Inn Debt Service Fund 3,775 389 CFD 88-3 (2008A) West Lake Elsinore Debt Service Fund 160,515 390 CFD 2003-2 Area C Canyon Hills Debt Service Fund 745 392 CFD 95-1 City Center Debt Service Fund 70,894 393 AD 93-1 Debt Service Fund 301,954 394 CFD 2005-5 (2012A) Wasson Canyon Debt Service Fund 139,833 604 Endowment Trust Fund 10,927 605 Public Improvement Trust Fund 859,677 606 Mobile Source Air Polution Reduction Fund 249,532 608 Trust Deposit & Pre Paid Expense Fund 1,372,054 617 Successor Agency Housing Fund 11,001,738 620 Cost Recovery System Fund 1,429,078 631 Lake Destratification Equipment Replacement Fund 143,715 650 CFD 2003-1 Law & Fire Service Fund 562,224 651 CFD 2006-5 Park & Open Space Service Fund 35,737 652 CFD 2007-1 Law & Fire Service Fund 94,862 653 CFD 2009-1 Parks & Lighting Service Fund 83,408 654 CFD 2003-2S Fire Service Fund 588,971 Total Pooled Cash & Investments $ 50,175,569 2of2 TYPES OF SECURITIES U.S. Treasury Bills U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Federal Agency Bond / Notes Municipal Bond / Notes Banker's Acceptances Certificates of Deposit CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS FOR THE MONTH ENDING MARCH 31, 2015 Current Balance Current Balance Current Balance Current Balance Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Commercial Paper Medium Term Corporate Notes Current Balance Repurchase Agreements Reverse Repurchase Agreements LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) Current Balance CAMP - Pooled Sweep Account Current Balance TOTAL DIVERSIFICATION PERCENTAGE 0.00% 29.91% 17.68% 0.68% 0.00% MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE UNLIMITED UNLIMITED $ 14,183,768 UNLIMITED $ 8,383,388 UNLIMITED $ 320,548 40.00% 2.37% 25.00% $ 1,125,000 0.00% 30.00% 0.00% 15.00% 21.54% 30.00% $ 10,216,616 0.00% UNLIMITED 0.00% 20.00% 27.66% UNLIMITED $ 13,118,042 0.17% UNLIMITED $ 79,192 47,426,554 100.00% $ Note: Local agencies are only eligible to purchase medium term corporate notes that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation (S & P) If a security falls below "A" by both rating agencies, then PFM Asset Management LLC will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. The CAMP Portfolio Summary and Statistics shows the credit quality held by the City's investments. *No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies *Totals include the Housing CAMP Portfolio. V o ti O i0 OJ O I� In pj O vNi m N M � N n V� E io N o 0 V1 � pj O m m o N O pJ N O N rn rn N N c o N L V V N b M N W n N N N T N Vr O O N O Ul O vl Ol O of O O Ol O lO O Ol Ol O OJ O O � , N i0 C O O N O N O o h vt O vMj m 0 O Irl pi O N O f� ill' O l0 l0 � m o rl cl o 0 M cf' Oi V .Wy M Oi N L! N U N a E 0 G d V v C Y N u m d E U N v c a a V c m a v os L211 v 7 C U V {O n l0 M n M M In O Ill Vt tp I� O N a l0 lM0 V O' Il) O 111 W h M O M M n O fr- n M� V M ONl M V cl V4 � N VS 1� Ol O O N M M Ol O M M M h O Ill Vl V 1p O M N V M O Ol pj N �j cl n N r O O N C Ol M N O Ol Ilj Ip N o M � a ti N v pl iF Y `m � m C .N O V M N n N vl b � n v C,J � T bIr � Q V p K � C O N K vOi O ti C U N < m %. N< E C Fin m a m U ¢¢ � 2 0 m rn a u Iytl c v v a Z m of 2 U � a a` V 0 ;•j Y Y a C a a E E 3 O 755. L O CL O 0 0 i O m ttl T N C � H � N 0 0 0 o v of ri V' N N of o o+ o N m .-, w h q- b M O� at O ' O O N �O OJ OJ R M M lO O u V N 7: � is m v N O N O O O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Q• O 0 0 O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 O N M 0 0 vi O vi vi vi O O ^ N in m in N N O O in 1� ti n o ti 0 O 01 O� N N N A v O H v o o z a � � " u m v v m0 oo v� a � A H o> > y v a¢ c n v V U 2¢ 9 6 0 7 0 0 N 0 L� N � O u V N 7: � is m v N O N O O O Q Ln 0 N N m M u u n` f m c c w L c 0 N L O w t7 v d Y N �l O i0 Ol R O tp I� M M M vl W Ol vl R O V T n N M O O N O M �O Ol N� W W �D O I.11 Ill O V1 In M O O O .y O O M �O V N Ol O Ol Vl lfl M i0 �D Vl t0 N l0 h Ol OVl O O V N Vl V M� ti V' M N V OJ OJ �O OJ h 1I7 -4N 6 O N M al 1l)6 In 6 O Ilt IA l0 N DJ OJ Ol N M N tD N l0 N N Ol I� .-I f` Ol O R p]Ni In � O R N f� S n H N 1� W vl T N O vl V O N i0 � R OJ O W I� N i0 n M t/t V W O I� O vl � O vl Ol M O V O V' vl vl V n Ol M N N O OJ O l0 Vl N f� n M R h n OJ O If1 O LIl Ill r O O O OJ N O Ln M N Vl M n M f� N V W h Ill N h N f\ N N Vl 1� N O n W V M N N Z O Z z Z O CC Z Z O Oz H Ii ¢ z O U Ni z rrU 0 d' < O iZr IMLI p = U iZ, Z a lwjl w w O U UV 2 Z< 'Z' K E m za 8ZFo gJZ w(oD i 0 z p °r<o°w< OQ Z U O a w 2u O O¢ UE x w 0w z0m0m�U owIn'S m w m¢¢¢ m V U U V 0w Iwi Iii l7 0 O O O N i F v d m a L �7 J V OM 00 VI 00 Y I�i1 l0 � h O' I� W W tN0 N W Ol l0 N ll� N OJ W h b O n O n Ol W P ,O vt VI Ol Ol M �/1 P N P m W �n h O if Y Ol 01 O m 10 P T P d d' 10 10 1� W P N CP � N N ill P h M N 10O Lr! 10 10 Qi P O O h U cO O O N VI O m V W �D h lOO 1� M W a � UI O O� I� ill W VI O P Vl M M i L W O Ol P V1 V1 OJ P W O f� ill M h a M P N Y U O W W IOII l o Ol f� U m T V 14 ,-i N O N Vl Ol O P m � Vl M N N O O P V1 P Ol O V l0 Iq 01 N N W P O Ol Ol m O 10 O Ol h n Ol W N P U T M Ol O N P �O W 10 N O ill V1 O W Ol O P Ol P lO N O M W I� M W m �O in 1� P 1O h V1 V1 m P (A O o ti M M o N N 10 h Ol O NO O O O O O O O O ti N N M H ti N ti ti M d ti N N O Y ^ Ln M N lO O N N Ol N N O �O F� O ti N M ill Vl N o h Ql O O N Q O O O O O O O O O H � O ry ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q O Q, f m a c + + + + + + + + + + + + + + K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o S 0 o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o vi o vi o vi O X X F G N O m rMi ua U U u Y I- W m W m m W W m W W m m m W M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U m m m rn m m m m m m m m o+ m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N N o ry C� UI � VI O U1 O Vl I� VI O W O Vl N V1 N U1 M ill � Vl O V1 N V1 N V1 N VI O Q W W O W W W O W ip W ip W W N W il) W ip W 1p W W O ,10. o 0 o o o o o .+ o o o o o m o m m z z ti z z z N z N z z ti z N z N z z z N z o z N a o ,_, T p VI VI H Ul IA O l!1 VQI VI Vl M (n � VI � VQI VI Y Y O Vl Q� VQl M m O W W M W M W W M O W N W W M W M fy W O Q W W p' O W M O ti p' O i`l p' O (•[ O ti p' ti V p_' O W h K O K p' rl ti [[ O p_' O � O W� � O p_' ti U F p � p � p � D � ❑ � ❑ � ❑ D � D � O � U F"' ❑ ~ O ~ � J V N ao o m N Y n G O m o S> N d N v r� � V O N f0 N .y O� N 1� iO OJ W V O fy M m C_ 1p T 1� M l0 V1 M v V o n OJ N -i O 16 o -D M 6 y P W N IA W E U o N N N N M _ O lL M M M O] M O N �O tM0 W 0 ~ r L m 06 o Q I.C.1 Q N O V L f b N U m M ti o p1 0 p. O O A M � W rn N O m O jp n ry o � V � V 0 ti O N H y .. O O W W O� O O O N M In oi N 1F O O O ti ti O m m m m m m Q < < < < < < < < N 0 0 C 7 p e 0 0 0 0 0 U G o o a o 00 0 0 0 o0 U a 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O � V1 a O < < to 'o z = OJ M) o 0 0 QI N of LL N o C o 0 P R y o c o 0 C o C 0 0 m tOn lfl N �O 4J J N yl L 1: Q� N W Vl w T N o O ❑Q W o �1 O ry 6 ¢ o M H a LL W N W .. ln M M n M NM M V n M M LU U m m Y tt uj' O Y rn O rn O f ON N ON � N uj Vl N VI N N o n N f W WVI vOi W ~ tiF ❑ w m t w o p a m z m O o O l: F o a p z. z o O Z O O o z Z z O m Q O O O] Q O m O] O Q o W O M o r�Oi N m m v r� o N O� N 1� iO OJ W V O fy M 1p T 1� M l0 V1 M O 1p N OJ N -i O n LO -D M 6 a P W N IA W N M M M O] M O N �O tM0 r m m o 14 O V b N n O N O O M W rn N O m O O ar� N O W O O W W O� O O O N M In O O O ti ti O m m m m m m Q < < < < < < < < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o o a o 00 0 0 0 o0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O � V1 O O IA O to O m QI N I� l0 N OJ V O P 4J Vl ❑Q T N o O ❑Q W o �1 ry 6 ¢ o M O M M M M M M M NM M M M M M M M tt v N ti Vl N VI N N to N N N U m o tiF w m N w o w S!: O o O F o o z. z o O Z O O o z Z z O m Q O O O] Q O m O] O Q o W O o O m O N m o O M O Z ti W z o ��❑� 0 0 o� 0 W � o o�� m � ro ❑ E O � ❑ � ❑ ❑ O � o 0 � w LL � Z � Z ❑ Z ❑ 1/i ❑ tZi ❑ ❑ O LL ❑ LL � ❑ LL ❑ F: in W W `n" Iq Lf�o n r� LO LQ It m � v vi m � ul v � .N-. � ll IR v w � � Vl M W 1O Vl O O VI O M � N N n n N h W OJ OJ M p p 1� M M O VI 111 O O O] O O O t0 M v In O M c� a n N 4 N CO M O 0 N M 1� ti IIR N L l In M n h IM O .-1 M V W fO N N O O O Ul O �/1 V1 V1 O '1 wl c0 c0 V1 O M O h C N O O n lD � N Vl m N OJ VNl O� ON O Q1 1(1 O O� N m O r V v 1 1 � 1 Q dam' M M M Q V O� O� Itl 1/Pl V N '1 n \ Y Q N ml N O N N - OM N N O � O O N N O N O �D O V O O I� O — � O — O o M V - V M N N M N Q' Q N O O O O O O O O O O h � T C ry Q Q Q Q 6 6 6 Q Q Q 6 4 Q f � m rl 0 0 0 0 o O o o O O o O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi vl N 1� 111 V1 O O n vt O wl N •i n U W�j�l u Op W W 2 N 2 w IQ.J Y f' J- M W .v T y H r W O Z J y OJ OJ OJ O� W p b W n ti J H ti H ti .^-� L+y4 p OM m N W ti O ti H H N N G y N VI N N VI� N Z O (J ZO M O O W ti VI W N � N Q N V Vl V1 2 i0 t0 W o U e o� o� o� e o zo 0o ao u uo VI V Z Vl Z Vl Z Vl O � O V K Z M O m O O J O �6i f0 O W .r W W 10 Oj M OJ O 0^ ti N O M Q H O H O ~ v Q ti ti V' ti 1u+1 T 9 W O M O .M-� W O ¢ O N U O .N -i T U z .o � � • Z O Z O Z ti o O O o � O o O Z o V O O 44 O = � O J Y 6 U Ll o vv ll� IP O1 � N V ti W OJ M m t/1 Vl h V M > O Vl O V O � m Vl Vl V Or M N ti ti N V OM H OM V' N lm/1 N N N h O V V h O O h 1p O M � Y O N h h 1� O V1 O f� M r0 r '~ p1 ip m O O m P n V In h m IO d Y W 1� 10 Vl M r0 m Or N O N O P N V' Q 9 Y OJ O O M 1� rO VI M V W M M p h _ 1� V1 b V1 O V1 N m V 16 N VJ CO M O V y Y V VI rp V m 1/1 rD N^ O tY l0 N Q M C Y G � N lO c� ri Vl O O r Or N O O � ti O ti H N N N j0 O O O O 00 VI I� O O O O O Vl M O O O O O Vl N O In 00 C N O1 O V N M O O 10 V M Vl V V [Y N N O rD 1(1 O V1 rp rp M N o W OJ uO T Or O 1/1 W OP Or V W O N M N V] N N M V N Vl N ti N N ti H ti ti ti ti W .V-� .M-, yN .I.J � O N M Or In N 11 OJ H ti N M V o Or I(I 1� (/f W O O rl N H N O N O V O 11 O V�1 O rp O Or O Or O M O M O d ti ti ti ti ti ti N N ti ti H N M ti ILO IO M m W O� o Or T l\l) p\ h O� V 8 O V T C N N rn o O o Ip LL 0 o o 0 0 0 o 00 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0D o 0 0 00 0 0 0 Oo 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o 0 N 0 M 0 o 0 0 o In 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 In o o In M ON fi ti N V OM .-� M V N Vl N n M N E � � M � 1•( VI m rp h �p 1� O N N S P O] N Vl N Vl lD N t0 V h C'J Or l0 rD T V .r V h rD N rO Or pr fM} ~O W ♦' � z� Z ¢ ti Z ¢ m W a m � m m m m vi m Z w m w o J H Q N .N. N N N N W N N N N N N N Q O. W W Or W N W N N OJ N p V Z O i+l 0 ti ✓: 4r O O z o m m V O o o m m H o o U o m F o o ¢ o d o a O! 10 LL .Vr a' .dr d -i d ti [� M F- M O H O tQ M d ti UI ti Z ti O d3 N f .N .M -n QN d C Q ~ F F S �- �- m a U a pm W I V1 p Q O U p I U p F � W F m p F � p H E p Q p 2 U 0 p U p H Q O W H Q O H �i p Ln N Y f O a m m Fy .' U'): T m N N N m O o M H IY1 p ry f > O m w � o = o ti M N u m LU m O L V � m = � � O I� M O N � � m m o O d C u O � � � n ti N W N o� M N n L C o v M Y N � O N n O r C N O M N •I� Q O N W LU u o L ' o W O voi tt � <L 9 N � ` d V Y M N U Q M 0 O H N '1 N Y f O a m m Fy .' U'): T m N o N m O O � N O T V LU o ti N O LU m O L V � m = � � O I� M O N � � o m o O d l u O � Y LU n O O W � N N v M Y N � O N ni N IA N M •I� N O O W LU u o o W N voi tt � Y 9 N � 0 O O W 0 g 0 N LL N O o o N C W C N T 3 0 o m a ¢ l G w U vim �o °o u ulrn ci I 6 0 0 C U M N 0 O H N '1 N O a m m Fy .' U'): � W H O O n O O VI LU 0 o N O LU V m m n M � � N O O � � o m o O O l u O � ^ LU n O O W � N N ti M O o N � N b M N M ..•.• LU u o o W N voi tt � Y 0� O O 0 ry N g 0 N LL f O o o N W O l G w vim �o °o 0 O H N '1 N O a m m � � W H O O n O O VI 0 0 n O O ro M n M � � N O O � � o m o O O q 0 M* O O � ^ N n O O W m ti M O o N � N b M N M a 0 O H N '1 N O n m H O O O O O p� O O o '7 0 0 O O O m M b n M � � z F Y M Y rv�i ti ti 0 M* O 0 m O Ill N VI O O N ti O ti V1 N O O N a � 0 0 O 0 0 OO O 0 N � V W 0 O H N '1 N O O O U ^I U q � � Z O o o '7 o a a g n a m a w O o z F Y M Y rv�i Z m Z m N 0 M* O 0 m O ¢ ¢ � VI O I 0 O H N '1 �a y A O O O O O 0 C H O P Vl .O ti h h m N O 3 c r m m .o o ^ In n m m m m M ro i c 0 Y d C P M n O� ip O rl In h m m M ~ Q � y w O 6 J y ul .O 1� vl M n Vl f� !� p M � N U N 14tD Ol N n m O m O m m o IP/1 m I/ni h P ti M `N' Vl m N m Vl P P e E n 7 Q T Vl m W rl N Om W n OR WIR M W C O � 7 Y = Vt V1 p O VI V1 Io O 16 O m O M m Oi N m Oo M O O O e{ 1N W co .D P W N Ln m — O .DO O M P P M Q m .O m h n W P W d0' I N M I XPi m Irn m m W N V' N av V OJ .O m W vl oOM P O. .O Iq m ul Vl .D U v m x � � d z Y F F tt K m g U K iY U U N� ❑ U ❑ E F f U m U m U E E 00 00 00 0 o O o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 � 6 � 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 vi 0 o vi 0 o 0 vi 0 o 0 o 0 0 G �n m In v In N o m vl M n m n In n P .ti r In o In o In N vi m w V e. O O X F .O Q N O O P M M VI VI N O p. M O• m m m m ro m m m m m U u m U u m m m m M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �}J � r j H m - N - n ti m m m m - - - k-+ � L. � O N o o \ N_ N O N \ o N O N o N_ O N o \ o N O o N_ \ O N \ \ ✓ a 0 0 0N+ o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 H o 0 o 0 0 o o o W U V1 OV1 o V1 W N O V1 O N VI N U1 M UI UI O VI N VI N VI N In O VI Fp Q_ \ W In W W W O W O . W �p o W 0 O G O O O O 0 0 O" O O O" O N Z ti Z ti Z ti Z ti Z ti z ti Z ti Z ti Z Z ti Z H z ti Z o Z ti Z ti ~ ..• �' UI Vl O Ul (/I VI Vl M VQI Ul O VQI M VI p VI ry�j VI ry�j Vl M Ul ti In O UQI u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K oop ~ ~ d ❑ .n H ❑ ❑ ❑ In I- In I- vl 1- ❑ vi F ❑ In I- ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ V��'II '�I���� In I- In I- vl F In F In F in F In V- In I- In F- v L t� O� f O < a a m m u m Z Y y V ~ m m U 11 y N Q o J O tr1 O i c � a cL � O M � > o L d i C � p W D �7 O ti M O N c O 7 N NO G > n wl f a` v w X iMn N z W D m a F h - � N N M VO' VI O O Vl VNl N M N N N N N M M M M M pF o .. rn o o^ o . v ip N � I/1 lD lD Fr� N M IQ O of O, tOii O� M VPi V• M W •i M W vt vt t� O� f O < a a m m u m Z Y y V N m m U 11 y N Q o J O G c � a �7 O ti M O N c O 7 N NO G > n wl f a` v w X iMn N z W D m a F h - � N N M VO' VI O O Vl VNl N M N N N N N M M M M M pF o .. rn o o^ o . v ip N � I/1 lD lD Fr� N M IQ O of O, tOii O� M VPi V• M W •i M W vt vt n m rn o o ro ro P IP- F O < < a > O N Q Q Q O Q O O O O O Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N O O O O O O O O O O C o� o I- o f- o w o I- o W o W w o w •• w ti v m o O o H o a o o z a zoz o ooo 0 0 o o w m o m m .n 10 w r 0 0 .ti O m o O 14 m o m o m o m m F M Q M Q M M n y O N O U O u O U' ~ uw~ UO H O U. 0 0 0 0o u NQNw NWW NW, Q EE_FvEZ ow ^ Z o NiY W O� ti P H P ti O W 0 V m O O O O Z O p O Z O Z O Z O Z Z p c V J O W W Z W0 Z Q Z 0Z0 Z Z W C V1 LL O w 0 tai <1 0 LL s LL p, LL 0 IQL A LL[ I N n N M h h N H N M a a 3 J t� O� f O < a a m m u m Z w w m ^ z u O m m U m a m m u m Z Q o J O w p c ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O G 0 O M N OJ O� P 0 0 O P In P �D M h 1� O l0 N CN O W N P N O P VOI O IOI1 M N l0 M N 1� o M N .y Vl VI UI M 1� n IA Vl V1 o O o o O o o rn o 0 0 0 n m rn o o ro ro P IP- F O < < a > O N Q Q Q O Q O O O O O Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N O O O O O O O O O O C o� o I- o f- o w o I- o W o W w o w •• w ti v m o O o H o a o o z a zoz o ooo 0 0 o o w m o m m .n 10 w r 0 0 .ti O m o O 14 m o m o m o m m F M Q M Q M M n y O N O U O u O U' ~ uw~ UO H O U. 0 0 0 0o u NQNw NWW NW, Q EE_FvEZ ow ^ Z o NiY W O� ti P H P ti O W 0 V m O O O O Z O p O Z O Z O Z O Z Z p c V J O W W Z W0 Z Q Z 0Z0 Z Z W C V1 LL O w 0 tai <1 0 LL s LL p, LL 0 IQL A LL[ I N n N M h h N H N M a a 3 J t� O� f O < a a m m u m Z w w m ^ z u O m m U m a m m u m Z Q o J O w p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O G 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o O Q� h 1� O l0 N f� OJ O W N P o O P VOI O IOI1 M N l0 M n m rn o o ro ro P IP- F O < < a > O N Q Q Q O Q O O O O O Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N O O O O O O O O O O C o� o I- o f- o w o I- o W o W w o w •• w ti v m o O o H o a o o z a zoz o ooo 0 0 o o w m o m m .n 10 w r 0 0 .ti O m o O 14 m o m o m o m m F M Q M Q M M n y O N O U O u O U' ~ uw~ UO H O U. 0 0 0 0o u NQNw NWW NW, Q EE_FvEZ ow ^ Z o NiY W O� ti P H P ti O W 0 V m O O O O Z O p O Z O Z O Z O Z Z p c V J O W W Z W0 Z Q Z 0Z0 Z Z W C V1 LL O w 0 tai <1 0 LL s LL p, LL 0 IQL A LL[ I N n N M h h N H N M a a 3 J C O O I ti A M C N ' O p O M m o � -i V O� O� W OJ O� N M V V1 V1 N N L� � C � u m N C O O Nm h N �O QJ O P N 00 O U O] H .0 d C i o m N N CO O P N M P O N n C � o w D N O M V O+ vl N mm P vl vl e 19 N P N v ry m W WI\ V o m rn P c vi o M o vi In m o in m c m _ P O� vl N iR LL Od C C G O a J\ lOp W OO^ ONJ IONNn NOl rhNMn Wntip� iO.N0 NMN 7 16 P N M 1 -a OP M O N CO r O y M C O 7 s= � P P O P V1 N N W N {J T M O O O O] �D N c0 Vl O lO M4 vt N M N N N W M P N wVl li h C > P M 1n IR ap P m N n Q' pJ CO C '. L O V1 H V1 Vl O O Vl N N h Vl M m tp O M N P O Vl N V1 O M N O � M N V1 n O P LIl O N P Q oz i1� T V M O N N N Lq N P M M P M N P P T N V0l h O T O v) N M N � a � Y V N n N y A 0 x Z o i LL C a ¢ ¢ > z a v z } '... y 5 O to o u u u 9 c S s u o p, O o a a u m m U m` m m Q j7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Q LL,: 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0R 0 0 0 o 0 L O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 vi 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 vi 0 0 o 0 m IL' Vl O h M O M In M M O •V l-1 n Vl O C a 1` U M N ¢ D N LLI O O o m O m ON ON j 01--i Z 2 Od ] 0 N Z O0m� ` a o o Nr Oo O O O LL o o O o o O o IW/1 o p o W -N• J m •N+ In o O o J uj.a W: u o za O� a� Uo o we U o zo Qowom o ow o Yf �r�i Y Q U_ Qm ON �.. F U U ON W ON 2 ON N W N ti\ Z N O W O N O O O �m g pz OZ U N d p a p� p� p m p S O� O S p M p U p 6 p u p U ZO p m p m p o7 N V1 O1 Q C O N ,l� LO C i U Y d d A ] W � 1� m N V LQ 7 J O O v^i V1 O M N N n If1 n vi N O N � C c O ei N b C0 7 Y Y O V1 1>) 1p N v� M C0 n m in rn N V M 1l1 rn Q N M b M mr •-I C6 O Cd M F CO V M C+ m o O V n m m r n o UI r u� n b N O M W N N N W 41 N W N r 1) O T N N N N V r r V1 VI r W Y u o m m o 0 0 0 o rn o f U N v Z z 6 > ¢ Z W 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O oo o O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 06 „ o 0 o o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q a o IRQ Q Q Q a o v n r n uC n vi o tp O O N y � �.d M y fi M �O V1 N V V �O V OJ i w r N ~ m Q Y m Z O lA O O O O O O O O N W N N O\ O Z N N N N O O O (J N N M a 0 � o Q o o Oz in U U Z d i ] O ti 0 w G � ON U N O` OU ON N O N O FT F \ J a A � Q z O0 O J J W QH U F d F- S I- I- O F w H F O I- v m r Vl H d UI 0 E 6 U U U 0 Q Z O U n� S' F- w 0 2 0 UI E -M Y o i a � O C N O ry 0 0 o b O � 0o O O IA N 7 O •u o O N m . d O A w D J N \ o O O O N V o W O n C � n J o O N t7 c a o a m U a d C c O N � O � Y= m M rn 0 u+ 0 m 0 rn n b � H a � e a N � N o » yy Y U � L •L F a u w d O Z w` 0 m` m M M rn a M m m L 1 N M N M N N n n N � N aq 1 1 V u �Y � H}I C C \ CJC 79V1 � 0 o pr! 0 17 ~ C N N ry 41 �7 n O I� n V1 N Q M 0 0 n �O o r Ci m t0 V 0 M OJ 0 vi v M 1 1p N V O In O� M V1 OJ O In N 0 V1 O iD O� O h W N M 0 0 0 0 O VI D] M N O < O 0 WJ l U' 0 M 1 C p^ U O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a M 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o0 N I c vi V1 O vi �n vi in v� � W OJ N N V1 CD f� r O 9 v o n m N a v o O O H F r°ri O O M Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1- M 0 0 0 0 O VI D] M N O < O 0 WJ l U' 0 M 1 C p^ U O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a M 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o0 N I c vi V1 O vi �n vi in v� � W OJ N N 10 N N N N f� V1 a 0 N N 0 0 N M O O In O O N C O HN Z � O VI D] M N O < O Y V N WJ l U' 0 M 1 C p^ U O o 0 U z m 0 O U Vt OU N OU N~ W vii M a M T �O 0 0 OM O N I c � Cion 003 0 �C y �n vi in v� e W OJ N N Fy N N N N C {n \ O O O O O U 0 OJ N 0 0 0 0 0o M IOfI N In O O N C O HN Z � O VI D] M N O < O C O U O O O O a o z o 0 C p^ U O o 0 U z m 0 O U Vt OU N OU N~ W vii M CN M T �O 0 0 OM O N I c � Cion 003 0 �C y �n vi in v� e W OJ N N Fy N N N N C {n \ O O O O O O 0 OJ N 0 0 0 0 0o C 9 o O O H F o 0 0 0 0 N` N r� r°i 1� voi o vpi ro o 0 0 CO LPn M O� M Ol IR Ow OM O t\ M Lq IOfI O In CJ O O O W h n V1 r � � O O 00 W vii M CN M T �O 0 0 OM O N 0 00 0 00 0 0 e W OJ N N 0 0 0 0 0 OJ N 0 OJ N 0 0 0 0 0o O o O O O o 0 O O M Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 O J � � N OM \ \ 0 ti 0 N VI N M M 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 e W OJ N N 0 0 0 0 0 OJ N 0 OJ N 0 0 O W S O X 0 O U O Y O Y O Y O Y~} O 0 M Z ti � ti OM } N F N� 0 O w .-� Ul ✓1 VI Vl Vl M p op �^ 0 0o op opp o o op o o Q; '^ p p E o p p t�- H 1- .o H N ti ell Q K O J � � N OM \ \ Q6 ti N N VI N M M K O Vl � Q Q Q W W N W N W N W OJ N N (\ O] O M O M N M OJ N OJ N OJ N OJ O] N N N W S O X O O O U O Y O Y O Y O Y~} O ti ell � � N OM \ \ ZO U N M N N VI N M M O O z� \ o o \ o N U N O Q Op Ul Vl Vl O IA N Vl o ? �n m � W S O X O O O U O Y O Y O Y O Y~} O M Z ti � ti OM } N F N� 0 O w .-� Ul ✓1 VI Vl Vl M p op �^ 0 0o op opp o o op o o 76 '^ p p E o p p t�- H 1- .o N f M M M M M M M M M M G O O O O O O O O O O 0 G O N N N N M h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ti ell L O VI O v O y O H O c N N s �n o vi c J FW- o F c E 0 0 0 M > o > c T w J w w 0 vi a a a i F v U M r r Y o Y 0 0 0> c D O C aS W co c N O E M \ C N Vl 0 0 w � a u ti h d c C ~ M m � � M F f O O O ID o 0 M N 7 N a9 a rn Lri i N � •- V O N OM ! jp LL d � a YI � u 0 o yNj o C O N O � � M UAMEW 7- .a O VI O C H O c 6 �n o vi c J FW- o F c H 0 0 0 O > o > c T w w w w �- vi a a a a M r r Y o Y 0 0 0> c D O C aS W co . M \ C N Vl 0 0 W u ti h d c C ~ M m � � M F f O O N N N N o 0 � a9 a o H ti ti ti O N OM � a YI � u tLo M a` a` r �L 00 O O U o 0 � 0 0 0 0 Q o ry a D' � W N UAMEW 7- .a N, o H Oi o N n a O VI O C O C O c 6 �n o vi c J FW- o F c H O O O] 0 O > o > c T w w w w �- vi a a a a M r r Y o Y 0 0 0> c D O C d W F y M \ C N Vl 0 0 O u ti h d � C ~ M m � � M F f O O N, o H Oi o N n a 0 VI O O P J J J J J M N O] 0 W � T w w w w �- vi a a a a w a Y o Y 0 0 0> c O m r r0O Z r a¢ vi O N W O N M W ti ti M M ti H ti n N N N N T o � 0 N 0 VI O O P m m io o 0 0 0 o c N N N \ O d h O \ M N O] 0 W � T z a w ¢ �- vi Y o Y 0 0 0> c m r r0O Z r a¢ vi O LL OG L_ � ti ti M M ti H ti n N N N N T o � 0 N H ti ti ti O N OM F a YI .r M M O vi o o N R N N O O O O O G o 0 0 o O 0 00 00 0 0 � 0 0 0 M N ui N a 2 u II�� W N Vl W N N N M N m m m io o 0 0 0 o c N N N \ O d h O \ � z a w ¢ Y o Y 0 0 0> c m r r0O Z r a¢ vi O LL OG L_ � ti ti M M ti H ti n N N N N T N 0 � H ti ti ti N .Mi F O O O O O N ui N a 2 u II�� :1 c d V Ol Ol m m M Ol o In O ri M m N n v io C N N CO N r,� I� N n W Vl N O CO V V1 O t` N N Oo OJ Q V1 V1 f� M V R d" Ol M Ol � O M Vl M Ol O V1 .+ OJ M O N ll � M M OJ l0 n Ol V Il W V M n M M O V M OJ V f� M n Ol OJ M ll M ll N ti Ol M ti M r N V N M N W Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol l0 Ill Ill tO Ol O O O O O O n O h O N M N M pJ I� h� � W ry M In vl m V n O in A m n N N to a C � vl O Ol M vl h t0 N Vt Ijl n O V' O O h n In O O O O y OJ O i0 O O O V M M M IA I� N h lO Ol N N h V Q h N N O O n M W V IO of O C L N M •-1 r-1 Ill d' L(t N N v C Ill Ol Ol Ill � O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O O O o 0 o O pO V L a` m +. z 'c m� 0 V V0 v v v v v o O v v v v S S S ti ti In in l7 (� ° ° S S S S In In vvi � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oO°, N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 vL rf 0 't 0O 0o .oa o O L L� 0 0 0 f�✓1 aL aL a a a a a t m m m m m m m m m :9 :° p m m m m m io m m �j "O "O 'O 'O 'D 'O 'O =p 'O "O "O "O "O "O "O 'O 9 ^ •� O O O d ry N In Io � In m m io In m m In m m E E E C In in In in in In in In !� N � i E 2 N iv iv m in in in in vl vl vl In In In .�". n .u'. n ."'. � .�. r .m. r r r r J d A _ O O - N N N N - N N N N N N N N N N \ \ N f M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N C I A w - --a - H - � d yC1 V u 01 .Mi N .--i lV .M -i M .--I Ill --� I() --� Ifl - Ill Lt) .M-, Vl - Vl V1 Ill L!l 1� - r .Ni h - n .M -i h .Ni n .--i t\ .N -i h • ' y C O O N N N N \ N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N 'C M l`l M Irl M M M M M M M M M y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 jf a O zo � l0 1p Ol V ll1 .-� Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M C O rvi 16 W M 16 D\ 14 n v m 6 m 0� of of of ri O C OJ Ol M M NI vt o> pJ v1 v) l} N N N O N N N N N N M d' Vl Vl to Fy F Lr N M N W N N m 2 Y C C O O n v) O O O O O W O O O O d. O O M W O �O Ill O O O W O ttl O O I� O V O lV vj ay' M R I� 1n O O O n O O G q W C NI OM ON W Oi In Ol Cli M O lc O Ol N y G N A O Itl v O N V N .-� N C Ill O lO l0 V O y O O o 0 o O O o 0 0 o O o O O O o 0 O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a IO Y_ c 0 0 0uu - 0 U o U c c 0 a c 0 a C O C O OO O O O C C H M M C ti C 000 -- 0000).2.0200E a d d d d O - L O L O- L O L O O O O L O L O L O L O > 'v G ! t LJ � L 10 N 'O 'D 'O N N 10 N l0 �O �D IO IO T N J J > > > > > > > O "O O J 7 7 7 J > sI y D 'O "O "O 'O O � > > C > > > > > > > > > 'O � -Cr -cr -- — S S S S S S S S E J O u cc 0 0 O 0 c 0 c 0 00 r v v o n o n n .n vI In In In In In In S y N lO F E E E E C L L O O O L L L .0 L L L L L L I) � � 2 i_ i_ E_ i_ m• L O p N N N U1 W J O J > > V Q r C ti ti N N N N � N H H ti H H H H ti ti Ill Vl lfl 1� Vl V1 V1 V1 I.n 1I� I� Ifl Ill In Ill L!) V1 /\ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O jr Z, M ` W � N O� O no Mpiq 9 V OJ M O O h N d O O h O O Ol W N T M N N �o 9 �o IN �m u d N N C C p > O O O N O N M O ip p� O N o U V f u F U � � O Q o c v d O E a aD V pj O O N M O ip p� O N O N W O O ul Vf N E 0 c d O V N c C O I N IGO > O � m N 9 N T U C~ f U Ol Ol v O � .N •N '� O_'V V O Om v o c u U V i V1 U a to Z K N �� ON v1 O V A OWi M N i� O M QI M O M m V -7L N 111 rn n 111Co M ro � " N v V N Ol O N O N�- lO W �D O � �v a M o m o n io v c i0 N N O M �p pl O< O 1� vt vl W j� Ol Ol � O C Vl f� O .-1 W LIl � ti ry O E Ot C O V rnM, N N H N vi yf C n c w � V > v 75 v ¢ u S > v = > o v -a` a o U1 N v, U75 > j K v U V m N Q U > O v C � C N t0 7 c � LL.• v > N W E V -O rCr O N rCi Vp o p v m m > m v s ob v v c 'E 'E O p\ Y E u v a c c U v 0 0 v m a Z c c a a V V M M O C C > > > U D V a a � ro m T � C ri o v of r V N N co vi of vi o 0 o vii ry d m o m n c N m m in c N V 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 o C O O O O C O O O O C O O o o C Ln O O O C V M M Vl C N V a o d 0 It I M Ol O R N N Ol M O M O O O N O �p M N O O O V O Ol V f� V1 O O 1l1 O t0 N Ln Ln V ON O OJ vl W OJ � O O N� OM W� IO \O N M N W Ol IIl I� OJ M O llt W Ol ti Vl R W W .Ni N O Il N lCl �O O N M Ill O M I� Ifl O cl O O h 0 O Ol H R lO O Ol C- M M Ol O W O 1l pl d- o � �O � O� � Il1 Ip o o vi Q� O o vl Oi IO Il) O Vl N N N In Ol � M� 0 0 N V' M Vl t!1 .Ni ti N z r 0 z ¢ n u z E z O Z 0p 0m a u m a M OO>¢ O o O O ¢zz x O xOS O z pO u Z—uGdax° u°O 1 o O,Onr O ¢ U m�¢0 w U w m w Q¢ m u u U pU LL LL= m a E v~i H OF 0 O O C O N i F e?� Ln iV Y�j. P P W n Vl N h V N P d' Ul w' M P'� 1C0 IQ N W N Ll R n V N V IR n O Z ~ i p1 N 10 � m 'O vMi m N V o kO V n m N .~-� Iq b a W W 0 � Q N N L O LL O 0 P Vl N Vl h N P O O n P m L L IT: P h OJ OJ 14 N06 Ll� ~ M V Y N Q• YP M N M V' ti N Q w N c H C M U Vl •-� M N M U) � N ti O � N Q• 0 li V1 P 1� o N n P V lD N N �p •4 OJ VI f� P P V N R O n � M M V P P lO h Vl M N P 0 m 0 ro ry r�i m .�+ vii r`ni o M m m 'L U 14 m 1� o T Q In P N O P ti P rl N ti N Q L •4 N N w Y YI W • O L N M n O� V �O N NO NO O� N �O t0 R A IO O N N O N O N O N \ �... N M N O N h . N M O . O O O O . O O O O O O N � V1 m a a a ¢ a ¢ a a a a a a a C U �. c a + + + + + + + + + + + + + n a a `d a a ¢ 'O U' 41Z o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 . L o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o p (/j mo0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o G @ a 0 o o O 0 o 0 o 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ,:: ,4 N o vi a o 0 0 vi iri N o 0 ca O� L � z M M x (/) a m w m ro m m m m m m m m J; M NN N N N N N N N N N N C� W= {A m W W N OJ N Cl N W N W N W N W N K� N M N W N W N N N VI^^ W Y h�,JS • . uw�j/ 3�D i0 1� 1� 1� n W � O O O N O N O N O N O O N O N O O O N O N • 0.. p\ \ \ � � O O O \ O \ ti \ ti O O '� l 'y I U') W C o a o o a p .••.� UI V VI O ✓l n UI O V1 O VI !� V1 N Vl N VI M V1 In V1 O UI N UI O W 1/O1 ~ 0 0 0 00 o o 0 0 � .. z z Q w ►: `i N N 10 V O M O1 N t� V O � ry Y O N O N V1 o O iO M !n m N M o n N o G rmi 1n ll� Ln h M N 'I b b V1 V1 P N O n d' M V1 h p{ y IR Iq Ol � N V1 16 10 Ol 4!1 V1 V h p a H N Y Y T O1 111 n T N O O O M �% � v4 O 6 O O O O 6 O 14 14 N O 10 O O M O V VI N 00 N 1p � V1 N O VI O O VI h O V1 (� O C h Q1 O v o y: n to I'D v oM cd o o ti � m 0 m tri ri mi � m U O o p m d' o o O .o ro 1� ro ry vi p O � H ti ti U N O Ol M .Mi' N N 'I N d N ti O O ti ti O O � N N_ �� O O O � O O � •N -i O O � N � .T p N Q Q 6 Q 6 ¢ Q Q 6 Q 6 f � m a c 00 0 0 0 0 0 0o O O o p y O O O O O O O O O p O O p' O 00 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o p' G M M OOi O M 'ONi � 1011 O N 0 O M N ti '-t 4J 1� V1 O1 O1 O O �iW OJ R 1'N n VI 1M11 O h 1� h n Vl � VI VI v'wf ti ti N � O .M-1 .Mi .M-1 .M4 •M-1 vJi T L � Y 10 OI 10 10 1D ti nn -1 N W OJ OJ p( } O \ O � OM N H Vl N Ul N VI N N \ N N N U G o O o Z o z o 2 O o Oa O O o O ,pa Z Ill Z 1°n Z N ¢ y m N JmC U p u Z O m❑ �J D O w p Z D Z O Z Z u O m 1 wmI of OJ ,O Vl Vl W OM O O O p o � O O Y, O L _J W O N ,O Oti N M m M m LQ VI m N O� M m N O O M O m n 0 O, U m N O Il O, O, r m Q m OU n E N .n o ti O m ti P m m In m a 'O Y W N h OJ h N n O m M � M O M lD M M O O N M fY VI VI L tp m O, N ul U a S y � O O 4ti ti H N � Il) IP In N O lt) h O O O Vlp Vl O O O O O O O C_ N O1 O DJ I� IO O In O N tD m n L!1 V1 C U O Q N M O O O O O \ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O am+ .moi v in rn m in rr in m n m c Vm QN fl ,-i N \ ` F N O Vit O �p O I� O ti H N O M O O O O O O m O m O N � � C N ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 6 ¢ ¢ ¢ 6 6 6 6 ¢ ¢ O � f m ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a ¢Q a ¢ a a V) K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o O o O O I 0 o C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00 0 o a o o OO 0 o o a a C0 p CR O p O p O p C0 OO 10 O p O p O O O O O O O O vi N vi VI o vi N vi 1� o O 0 O 0 I/1 o V1 O vi V1 o m 0 V1 0 f { V 7 11 ^ M M ,O m O, �D W O IO IO M O V1 In U �O O, N t0 t0 V1 t0 N O, M 1p n N ry P CO O, P O O p J vf' U1 V1 V1 .v O N N Z N N o O N O N N g N W N_ M N N N O\ O N m a O Oj N O o ¢ N Vit ly N W N N OJ Z 0 V) O IO Q M W W f o o H V OU p o o O o O o O° z Pn Pn m o o E 0 o m m o ti W m O O y U O O} -i 4 -i Q Hry N M OU FQON tiHN Z 0 O N O W? O hi lmL N N Q N N ti O Z\ Z U O O W O O Z N } o Z o 0N-. O ly O M a H p O o Q o O 4 W a 0 O S VI f- u 0 U 0 0 m n E n U D ¢ n U o U 0 6 Ln G 0 N N M m ri 16 e N n tri O (0 f � n n o O O iv ti N tT N L R H N O � O ROi m a+ w E m dp W Um NNf C6 h £ i' o n ro o O 0 O 0 m m P U o E o` w • W � � ^ p o � p : u U C Q M o M .ai N N N V P P Uh � O O O A ^! Itf V oo O O P R P P W O Y O t4 N W oo O O N V m •r U 1 o O ^ O N N W VNf IPII 7 �1V (Q Ip IO O .y O O N Ln f K U Z, Q LCL : + ,i. a 'O C7 t^ a a H ! y O O O O O t^ 1!1 1(1 h O O O Itl N rl 1p C � N N ONi w 0 o '. l � a W r w ULU m v r ^.,• H: .y c M .. a J LU W' i W w U o F o o F P N m o a xp Y O f O N IL L 9 N RI N Z P a jd N �` W o] N m m m O M P N N P v o- .. .. .. .- y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m C H O c P VI P o u E OOH u b [Y V U Y V1 N M M N m N 0p P Vt O O Vl V V Ill Vl 1 m O N m O P O V N N 0 O M W M ii � O O y 0 0 o a N N N M M M M V V C c O p p p 00 00 LO ti r m 0 tt N P P O V l0 r/ N Vl r m rl M Y O O M O VI O O r m O O U Y r r r N r vl m r in d � W O J Y r M V P P N S H W r N O N V N P V O M N r lD r N P O r N P P r N V � O rl N M N N ti rl rl N C E 7 Q f V N, x '0 v � z m c P VI P o u E OOH u b [Y V U Y V1 N M M N m N 0p P Vt O O Vl V V Ill Vl 1 m O N m O m 0 M N M 0 O M W W d 0 0 o a o 0 N O 0 N C c O p p p 00 00 0 0 0 0 .-1 N M N H ti H H rl N Y O O M O VI O O r m O O r r r N r vl m r in Yr � N10 1p N Vl V r M V N V �O r O r N P P r N V rl N M N N ti rl rl N f V N, x '0 v � z m c a f F u u E U m u U m t7 u U U n p h O n O p p p p p p p O M 0 CD O C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 N O 0 N p p p 00 00 0 0 0 0 .-1 N M N H ti H H rl N o P �o 0 o- rMi vl P 4'I N N N N N N N N N N N N ti ti ti N N N ti ti ti ti ti ti V P P P P P U P P P P P P P T Y O N O O O O o . O N . o O O n 0� O \ \ � O O O \ O \ ` O r, O o 0 0 o c 41 VI O V1 r VI O V1 O V1 r V1 V1 N VI m �p w p IOII VI O N m o V1 V O V W O W m W O W O W pJ W W �p W W N W Il) W W W 1 F F F F h b b b 0 0 h 0 N F 4% Y N~ z N N N N N ON z pN O ON Z M z M z V' z P z N O V z� z� z� z� z„ z� z� z„ z„ z� z� z .Y d VI M VI O Vl ti VI � UI M m O VI M IA M VI O VI \ VI M VI O VI U� I- f- p f- F D 1- p F❑� p� p� O� p F p� p� G v v,�mi-�n�ml-vli-�nf-�lr-�,rMr�,rM�Mr-Mr b N M m ti m m z O w .ti O 0 o n N h r n 0 N M M 0 0 wt 0 m M O M M 0 N ri M 6 b N M b M ti ti Cd z w O 0 o n N O y � 0 0 M 0 lD O ti z O O 0 p 0 0 o M � 0 0 N 0 0 wt 0 V1 M O M M 0 3 A z 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 M O M M N Y n N r N 3 A K7 f M"Ilf� r� oC� 1� o 0 0 y N O O O O p O O O O O G O Q O 0 W N r N ry v 1n o p N m P L_ 3 N N N N M N O ti •+ O a0. 0 �(• O O OJ N Q h •-� .-� �D M W CJ N N V Vl O O 7 0 fJ N N N M N O .v N N p1 � � d W D O] O V O U 0 o n 0 O V r O Vl N cY V1 p In N f� n N N 0 Vl O V W 0 C L O eF C � a J \ C O VI O h M 10 N N O O In •-I M Vl N N V N O pl ly •-� 1(l •-� W V I� .n p v1 M N N c n v1 n v1 o P v1 v c Lc �- v •" O 7 V O oM O� P O V' O 1l1 ry OJ N ID N Y' L_ q 1� V1 O 0 n M 1(1 N M N P H DJ V V1 M O 10/1 Ip IliW � h N VI O M O O O VI O P V 10 M N h VI QI O (7 VI VI 10 N Vl N N H d d O Lq Lq 1011 M 1PI1 N M n M Y U O O O O O 00 O P P ti O O O N L •C m O O O O O O P P O O O O O s s V y � z o C u aw u a p S S L O m g w LL F m z z m w u m m U m m O O p pp O O O O 00 00 p p p p p O p � 00 00 00 00 p O O p p p O O 0 O p p p 0 0 0 0 0 o C � o 0 0 0 p• P vi o M O 0 o vi o op vi M N n ll) N C vi N tri N N N 'I } H M OJ 1� 111 P P P P O O W O] d' J V P M M � U' V1 Q W O N W W W l� (9 U' U• 1� n N V1 VI It) 1f1 � W O=i N 0 111 ti H rl ti ti M N M 10 N V' ti (� U M M M M M M M M M M V W N 01 yU 4f T m w w �J p -- . - - - - m - - O O p p O ti z p A N O O O N N N N N \ \ N p O 0 J N N N a C O W O O O F 10 10 F N W 1yMj o W o W\ �j N O VI Q N VAI U U r O Q O Q O r q U• O O d' O O . U O o a 0 0 0 \ Z o Z o Z o O\ O\ O\ O o D O o ~ o a o W a 1fi Z O o jl1 p Z VI Z V1 Z V1 Z aW m Q U Q Ll Vl Wm O m O m O Q OJ Q W O iO ~ O N Pi N \ y m o p o 0 .. O .4 O i y o o N M a CD -1 N � O W O N N N tT y N Iy O Q O C O m �% N N N N M M p p (•j Iy O O n n H IWI1 � M w M � 7 O M M MN-� rJ M M M V p N rl � U N 6 W D J Y Od' V1 m r N n N 1p M O O \ N N In M O W V N O� M W O ti(7 06 ♦p O •y p M r M E � a \ M V) M M O U N W N p a n N m o In OR N V W C `c V O 7 Y W W O O O O O O 67 N O O M OJ Ill O On O] N M {11 O O N O o o o N V M 1J 1Mi r 0 Is m m v o in p m In ro vl o vi n N o 0 a .. .i ID O� O Ill N O] M N n V1 O M O O] p p N O n N Vl W p 'y U o 0 0 o m rn m a o o F � d Z -+ F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o p C o o o 0 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi r o a o 0 o vi o 0 o o vl In o In m In o vi n o o 0 0 a .+ ti Qd' � V N IO N p p p r IO N IO p o 0 o OI rn p p G M w 0 N O N N N\ N ON O \ N N N O U W` M m o u a0 o Q o¢ e o 0 0 0 o m O z C,) o o f O f c� o m z o O n u .Ni .. y' Q ro a \ U N v 2' .-i p O Q .-i (•) •-I Z N Q N U N 5 Z O O �� Q Q O 0 F F $ N (J N N u W w F O F O z O u o O a �i O O w O N x O V Z 0 x u 0 I- m F- �- I- O I- a x Q 0 E Z m m O F O U O Q 0 U U O Q Z O O VI $ O VI \� _ 6 r4 kR \� _ a o w o N N sem+ ti N d � M t 0 U O 9 U N G M N Q _ 0 E W w � a s C J U N b N O I N Vl Vl M O O In O M N Vl In O O O IO O O O O N N VI O tV N o O N o O o o O 00 0 o O O V N V1 Ill 0 U1 O W L L M IM/1 O M OJ M OJ V M H OJ M n 41 M U a S CIS m Qo G IA o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o0 0 0 M m N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N p 1p o m ti o o O O O o o O 0 o O o 0 (a 6 y P �- H 0 o p o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 o p 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 G o 0 o o O o O o 0 0 0 0 o vi Ili o 0 � Q,; 0 rMi C z a N q N N N M U L71 VJ: ry IML Q� U U � O 7 N LL UI F � K r-1 d' S Q ti N a O OJ W OJ OJ OJ OJ ON ti .: = Ol O M M M M M Q� T OI Ol Ol Ol m ✓ � W Z.: o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N �\ N Ol J Z M ZZ W\ 6 OJ O O O W eo o w \ o z o o 0 0 \ \ \ e Q o 0 vl o m m 0 to o In N In Q b ti U� m o uq O .. O W: 'J' M Q M Q W N M M O M W Ol O M O� Z Z O OJ W W O W W W O Ol W O a UJ ;� K- ° O $ v � 4 o vt Ln N m '•I '. to w � M ■o 0 M m a 0 o � N M O u U L W a '. L a� VI •N.• MO m o O p o � o 0 rn O O C m m w K Q L 1 � xv1 0 N N W m n ti P M m I LO o w � r O dS , O M c rn m O� O O o c O � 0 N tiO 0 0 0 T � � H � O O u qv" � o 0 F O o 6 O C c e •L o 0 0 o C o V o O o N o0 N •0 m N L � rl 7 U- O a z' Ln ` u U u d a a C 1 U m W .... 0... U ^ Y z: O ~ C uj �' W O O a a N w,o d w u N O 1 N v Z ti S a H W Imo- O m Z � C ro o. _. Y.' N O A O C O LL O n M m a 0 o � N M O u U W a W a 0 p o CI o 0 O O O O C m m w K p L o 0 N W m n ti P M m I LO o w � r O N O M c O m O� O O o O � O N tiO N � � H n M m a 0 � N M O O N V1 0 p o CI o 0 O O O O O ry vc+ ti u u N W m n ti P M D\ O C \ C M M a o c o w � r O Z � c M c � O c W \ O a M N � � H n T � � H � O O 0 � N G � N F O o L L d C N n V m l .v d' V V V cY Q' 10 10 •i ON N Ol V Ol V h M O N I, N N n r M M W M M M V V O N M O 1� M Ol h O M n I/1 C OJ O ✓1 M OJ M tD N 01 W W M (I M d' .-i O l0 n rl 10 O V ll rl Ol ll 03 ~ pN I� n h r OJ N m n 10 M M d" V V V1 O1 N N V V u .c Lm U) E m I(f c ,y � v c o+ w L m d C O E N aL+ C C M O O m 1/1 V O i0 O O 10 O O I0 o O O O O ti O N L/t LIl Q M Vl M I� M u1 V1 O M p III U1 O O O O y� O N H 10 n Ifl V t0 N M N � tp pt M r u1 V1 (.'1 O y F G O O O O O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O d p, N Y_ t C z N O JJ J (A 4J 3 u 0, U Q:. Q7) +. ,.. V ' U U LD U c O c O N i� vl i/1 O m l7 ti .c -i N 2T o a O O O O a a a O O O O O 0 t W! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m — 0 0 0 0 0 d r cl� a d d d d d d 6 6 O '... L U IO lO lO J lO J N J fO J P p N _ �O N _ l0 'D > > "O > 5 > �O m N N O "O 'O "O "O 'O N C 'O 'O 'O 'O "O "O 'O '> ^ L% ' Q > > > > > H > > > > i-cr rcr rcr > > > > > J, C Ur. W' o .c. .c-, c � LL c c c „...� oL-. �_ �_ i_ �_E 2"O LL Uj "O O i ^" W: N O v - - - - - - - - - v N 10 O vl i ll VI Vl !1 t in I— n n n n n n OO O O O .-� N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ M M M f. y O LLJ: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LU d F ,. m m - - - - ti - - - - - - - - - — — ti — — .^.. LL. v � y� O F CJ O Ln V V � o 0 C O� d� ✓O u N in I� o v rn rn ti p N io ro of o � [If 0 0 N iv N N t f ry � r p N c =o �y c w v � L �- 0 0 E o N ! C C O O O O O M n N O OJ .-1 M M Vl N N a N L p L 0 d O O O O O O L o u o 0 0 0 0 0 Lm .. L 'C in � 9 u d A � p C D] N O C EL y o o uai m a+ ro o N O V)' cn,M^. moo v p ri Z' Ln N N N N N 3,) O.', S S S S S v 0 0 0 0 o E W'. O O O a G d d d d C N m K '� N W N F'•}i O. U J J J 7 > ::.J p a -o -c c W' O LU v Y N m m m io m m JP C L L L L L L f W 0 U y` s W V) 0 0 o O O o C 9 0 12 c r LL m O' v N m y ILO p M M M M M M 01 C m O O O O O O O U L 9 U O N oa'Ku U+ u u u Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 3) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-546 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 C 1 TY OF LADE DLSINOF,E �M DREAM EXTREMEn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: April 28, 2015 PROJECT: Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 - An Application to Develop Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. APPLICANT/ Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, P.O. Box 96, Murrieta, CA 92564 OWNER Pasadena Elsinore, LLC, 1712 Deer Creek Lane, St. Louis, MO, 63124 Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003- 04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02, a Development of Eight Industrial Buildings Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- -, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 for the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-01 April 28, 2015 Page 2 of 5 Development of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Background On April 7, 2015, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission unanimously (5-0) recommended approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-01 for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Additionally, the Planning Commission also unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2015- 24 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 to allow outdoor storage for this industrial complex. Proiect Description The project site is located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. It consists of flat, undeveloped property between developed industrial buildings located on Hunco Way and along Pasadena Avenue. The applicant is requesting approval to construct seven (7) buildings (Buildings A thru H) on each of the eight (8) parcels within Parcel Map No. 29996 and one building (Building J) on the remaining lot of Parcel Map No. 29325. The buildings range in size from 9,318 square feet (Building E) to 19,475 square feet (Building C -D). Architectural Design The applicant is proposing to use the same style of architecture that was used in the first phase of the development which is a typical industrial contemporary style found in the industrial areas of the City. The design of the proposed buildings are earth tones with glazed glass. Analysis General Plan & Zoning Consistency The project site is designated for Limited Industrial (LI) land uses on the General Plan's Land Use Map. Zoning on the project site is M-1 (Limited Manufacturing). The proposed industrial buildings are in conformance both the General Plan land use designation and the project site's zoning. The proposed industrial buildings are also in conformance with all applicable development standards of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Design Review Committee that includes staff from Planning, Building and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-01 April 28, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Safety, Fire and Engineering reviewed the requested Design Review application, recommended applicable conditions of approval, and support the application. Land Use Compatibility As shown in the above table, the proposed project is an extension of existing industrial and commercial uses immediately adjacent to the project site. For this reason, the proposed project is compatible with adjacent existing and approved land uses. Background The first phase of development of this Industrial Complex known as Collier Avenue Business Park included Tentative Parcel Map 29325 which subdivided a ten (10) acre parcel into eleven (11) industrial parcels ranging in size from 24,829 square feet to 82,764 square feet. There was an associated Design Review for Industrial Project No. 99-4 that included ten (10) new buildings and one (1) existing building ranging in size from 8,400 square feet to 33,780 square feet. Mitigated Negative Declaration No 99-4 was completed pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These items were approved and adopted by the City Council on September 14, 1999. The Industrial buildings and associated improvements were completed on all of the parcels except for one. The applicant is requesting approval to construct the final building on this one remaining vacant parcel as part of this current entitlement. The second phase of development was a request for approval and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, Tentative Parcel Map No. 29996, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003-09, and Design Review for Industrial Project No. 1-2003-05. EXISTING LAND GENERAL PLAN ZONING USE Project Vacant LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Site Manufacturing) North Industrial Buildings, LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, Manufacturing), CM Vacant (Commercial Manufacturing) East Industrial Buildings, LI (Limited Industrial), GC M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, (General Commercial) Manufacturing), C-2 Vacant General Commercial South Industrial Buildings, M-2 (General M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, Manufacturing), Floodway Manufacturing) Vacant west Commercial Uses, LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Vacant Manufacturing) As shown in the above table, the proposed project is an extension of existing industrial and commercial uses immediately adjacent to the project site. For this reason, the proposed project is compatible with adjacent existing and approved land uses. Background The first phase of development of this Industrial Complex known as Collier Avenue Business Park included Tentative Parcel Map 29325 which subdivided a ten (10) acre parcel into eleven (11) industrial parcels ranging in size from 24,829 square feet to 82,764 square feet. There was an associated Design Review for Industrial Project No. 99-4 that included ten (10) new buildings and one (1) existing building ranging in size from 8,400 square feet to 33,780 square feet. Mitigated Negative Declaration No 99-4 was completed pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These items were approved and adopted by the City Council on September 14, 1999. The Industrial buildings and associated improvements were completed on all of the parcels except for one. The applicant is requesting approval to construct the final building on this one remaining vacant parcel as part of this current entitlement. The second phase of development was a request for approval and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, Tentative Parcel Map No. 29996, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003-09, and Design Review for Industrial Project No. 1-2003-05. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-01 April 28, 2015 Page 4 of 5 These items were approved by City Council on February 10, 2004. Tentative Parcel Map No. 29996 was recorded in November of 2005; however the Design Review and CUP expired on February 10, 2005. A subsequent application for the second phase of development (Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 and Industrial Design Review No. 2007-02) was approved by the City Council on March 25, 2008. These applications also expired. Environmental Determination On February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact Analysis and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis ("Reports") prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. constitutes Addendum # 1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. Staff recommends adoption of Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to the processing Industrial Design Review No. 2014-01 has been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. In order to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on operations and maintenance issues in the City, the project has been conditioned that the applicant consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right- of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-01 April 28, 2015 Page 5 of 5 within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Prepared by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Grant Taylor Director of Community Development Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. City Council Resolutions 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Site Plan 6. Full sized Plan set 7. Addendum #1 to MND 2003-04 8. Planning Commission Staff Report 4-7-15 J rI 0Qd-`JNianina c� 3aoNIM �< NaJVd RIlSn4NINI VN30HSbd .,,, � � s. `� .. � a... �_,.. .. , u _ ,,.. Wit, a -'� KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES„ INC. PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS December 17, 2014 Prepared by: Bryan Crawford Carl Ballard, LEED GA William Kunzman, P.E. QPpF ESS/pN A. KU,�� �/7/At/l ,k�L1M No. TR0056 Z zo d * TRAFFIC 9 OFCAU� 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 Orange, California 92868 (714)973-8383 www.traffic-engineer.com 5896a Table of Contents I. Executive Summary............................................................................................................1 A. Project Description.......................................................................................................... 1 B. Analysis Methodology...................................................................................................... 1 C. Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact............................................................... 2 D. Existing Traffic Conditions................................................................................................ 2 E. Traffic Impacts................................................................................................................. 2 F. Roadway Improvements..................................................................................................3 H. Congestion Management Program Methodology...............................................................4 A. Congestion Management Plan.........................................................................................4 B. Prescribed Methodology for a Traffic Impact Analysis....................................................5 C. Mitigation Measures........................................................................................................6 III. Project Description............................................................................................................7 A. Location............................................................................................................................7 B. Proposed Development...................................................................................................7 C. Site Plan...........................................................................................................................7 D. Phasing and Timing..........................................................................................................7 IV. Existing Traffic Conditions................................................................................................ 10 A. Study Area...................................................................................................................... 10 B. Surrounding Street System............................................................................................ 10 C. Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls............................................................11 D. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes.......................................................................... 11 E. Existing Intersection Delay............................................................................................. 11 F. Existing City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Plan............................................................... 11 G. Transit Service................................................................................................................12 V. Project Traffic..................................................................................................................20 A. Site Traffic......................................................................................................................20 1. Trip Generation....................................................................................................20 2. Trip Distribution...................................................................................................20 3. Trip Assignment...................................................................................................20 4. Modal Split...........................................................................................................21 VI. Traffic Analysis.................................................................................................................28 A. Future Traffic.................................................................................................................. 28 1. Method of Projection...........................................................................................28 2. Other Development............................................................................................. 28 3. Ambient Growth...................................................................................................28 B. Average Daily Traffic......................................................................................................28 1. Existing Plus Project.............................................................................................28 2. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project..........................................................28 3. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative...................................................29 4. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative...............................29 C. Delay and Level of Service Analysis............................................................................... 29 1. Existing Plus Project.............................................................................................29 2. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project..........................................................29 3. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative...................................................30 4. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative...............................30 VII. Recommendations...........................................................................................................60 A. Roadway Improvements................................................................................................60 1. On- Site................................................................................................................. 60 2. Off -Site .................................................... ............. ....... ....... ....... I.... I..................... 60 Appendix A — Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix B — City of Lake Elsinore Scoping Agreement Appendix C — Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix D — Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Delay List of Tables Table 1. Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service............................................................13 Table 2. Project Trip Generation................................................................................................. 22 Table 3. Other Development Trip Generation.............................................................................31 Table 4. Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service........................................32 Table 5. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service............................................................................................................................ 33 Table 6. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Intersection Delay and Levelof Service..............................................................................................................34 Table 7. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Intersection Delayand Level of Service.............................................................................................35 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location Map.......................................................................................................8 Figure2. Site Plan...........................................................................................................................9 Figure 3. Existing Through Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls..............................................14 Figure 4. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes..........................................................................15 Figure 5. Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .......................16 Figure 6. Existing Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ........................17 Figure 7. City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element ................................................. 18 Figure 8. City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections.........................................19 Figure 9. Project Trip Distribution - Cars....................................................................................... 23 Figure 10. Project Trip Distribution - Trucks...................................................................................24 Figure 11. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes...........................................................................25 Figure 12. Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ........................ 26 Figure 13. Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .........................27 Figure 14. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone Map.............................................................36 Figure 15. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 1 Trip Distribution.......................................37 Figure 16. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 2 Trip Distribution.......................................38 Figure 17. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 3 Trip Distribution.......................................39 Figure 18. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 4 Trip Distribution.......................................40 Figure 19. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 5 Trip Distribution.......................................41 Figure 20. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 6 Trip Distribution.......................................42 Figure 21. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 7 Trip Distribution.......................................43 Figure 22. Other Development Traffic Analysis Zone 8 Trip Distribution.......................................44 Figure 23. Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes......................................................45 Figure 24. Other Development Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes......................................................................................................................... 46 Figure 25. Other Development Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.........................................................................................................................47 Figure 26. Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes......................................................48 Figure 27. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..................49 Figure 28. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Average Daily Traffic Volumes.........................................................................................................................50 Figure 29. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Average Daily TrafficVolumes..............................................................................................................51 Figure 30. Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.........................................................................................................................52 Figure 31. Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.........................................................................................................................53 Figure 32. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................................54 Figure 33. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.........................................................................................55 Figure 34. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................................56 Figure 35. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................................57 Figure 36, Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes............................................................58 Figure 37. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour............................................................................................................................... 59 Figure 38. Circulation Recommendations....................................................................................... 61 I. Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the traffic impacts resulting from the development of the proposed Pasadena Industrial Park project, and to identify the traffic mitigation measures necessary to maintain the established level of service standard for the elements of the impacted roadway system. The traffic issues related to the proposed land use and development have been evaluated in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act, The City of Lake Elsinore is the lead agency responsible for preparation of the traffic impact analysis, in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act authorizing legislation. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the existing plus project, the anticipated opening date with full occupancy of the development in Year 2016 at which time it will be generating trips at its full potential. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A. A. Project Description The project site is located adjacent to Hunco Way between Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street in the City of Lake Elsinore. The project is partially built and in operation with 152,405 square feet of light industrial proposed to be built via eight different buildings on currently vacant lots. B. Analysis Methodology A series of scoping discussions were conducted with the City of Lake Elsinore to define the desired analysis locations for each future analysis year. The scoping agreement is included in Appendix B. The analysis of the traffic impacts from the proposed development and the assessment of the required mitigation measures were based on an evaluation of the existing and forecast traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site with and without the project. The following analysis years are considered in this report: ■ Existing Conditions ■ Existing Plus Project Conditions' ■ Opening Year Conditions The roadway elements that must be analyzed are dependent on both the analysis year (project Opening Year) and project generated trips. The identification of the study area and ' The existing plus project conditions has been analyzed to comply with the Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale CEQA court case. This scenario assumes the full development of the proposed project and full absorption of the proposed project trips on the circulation system at the present time. This scenario is provided for informational purposes only, and will not be used for impact determinations or mitigation. the intersections and highway segments requiring analysis was based on an estimate of the two-way traffic volumes on the roadway segments near the project site. C. Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact The following definitions of deficiencies and significant impacts have been developed in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore requirements: The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The General Plan states that peak hour intersection operations of Level of Service D or better are generally acceptable. Therefore, any intersection operating at Level of Service E to F will be considered deficient. D. Existing Traffic Conditions 1. The portion of the project site analyzed is currently undeveloped and is not generating significant trips. 2. The existing roadways adjacent to the project are Hunco Way, Collier Avenue, and Pasadena Street. 3. The study area intersections currently operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions. E. Traffic Impacts 1. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 1,348 daily vehicle trips in Passenger Car Equivalents, 181 in Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 187 in Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the evening peak hour. 2. For Existing Plus Proiect traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours. 3. Based upon discussions with City of Lake Elsinore and County of Riverside staff, several pending and/or approved projects were included as other development. 4. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersection that is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) -#4 5. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak 2 hours, except for the following study area intersection that is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - l4 6. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersection that is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - 44 F. Roadway Improvements The following measures are recommended to mitigate the impact of the project on traffic circulation: On -Site 1. Site-specific circulation and access recommendations are depicted on Figure 38. 2. Construct Pasadena Street from the west project boundary to the east project boundary at its ultimate half -section width including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, as necessary. 3. The site should provide sufficient parking spaces to meet City of Lake Elsinore parking code requirements in order to service on-site parking demand. 4. On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. 5. Sight distance at project accesses should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans must be reviewed by the City and approved as consistent with this measure prior to issue of grading permits. Off -Site 1. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Lake Elsinore should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. 3 II. Congestion Management Program Methodology This section discusses the Congestion Management Plan. The purpose, prescribed methodology, and definition of a significant traffic impact are discussed. A. Congestion Management Plan The Congestion Management Plan is a result of Proposition 111 which was a statewide initiative approved by the voters in June, 1990. The proposition allowed for a nine cent per gallon state gasoline tax increase over a tive year period. Proposition 111 explicitly stated that the new gas tax revenues were to be used to fix existing traffic problems and was not to be used to promote future development. For a City to get its share of the Proposition 111 gas tax, it has to follow certain procedures specified by the State Legislature. The legislation requires that a traffic impact analysis be prepared for new development. The traffic impact analysis is prepared to monitor and fix traffic problems caused by new development. The Legislature requires that adjacent jurisdictions use a standard methodology for conducting a traffic impact analysis. To assure that adjacent jurisdictions use a standard methodology in preparing a traffic impact analysis, one common procedure is that all Cities within a County, and the County agency itself, adopt and use one standard methodology for conducting a traffic impact analysis. Although each City has developed standards for preparing a traffic impact analysis, traffic impact analysis requirements do vary in detail from one City to another, but not in overall intent or concept. The general approach selected by each City for conducting a traffic impact analysis has common elements. The general approach for conducting a traffic impact analysis is that existing peak hour traffic is counted and the percent of roadway capacity currently being used is determined. Then growth in traffic is accounted for and added to existing traffic and the percent of roadway capacity used is again determined. The project trips are then added and the percent of roadway capacity used is again determined. If the new project adds traffic to an overcrowded facility, then the new project has to mitigate the traffic impact so that the facility operates at a level that is no worse than before the project traffic was added. If the project size is below a certain minimum threshold level, then a project does not have to have a traffic impact analysis prepared, once it is shown or agreed that the project is below the minimum threshold. If a project is bigger than the minimum threshold size, then a traffic impact analysis is required. 2 B. Prescribed Methodology for a Traffic Impact Analysis The traffic impact analysis must include all monitored intersections to which the project adds traffic above a certain minimum amount. In the City of Lake Elsinore, the minimum project added traffic that is needed before an intersection has to be studied is 50 or more peak hour trips. The City of Lake Elsinore allows Level of Service D to be used as a maximum acceptable threshold for the study area intersections. A significant impact occurs at a study intersection when the addition of project generated trips causes either peak hour Level of Service to degrade from acceptable Level of Service (A thru D) to unacceptable Level of Service (E or F) or peak hour delay to increase as follows: Level of Service A/B = By 10.0 seconds Level of Service C = By 8.0 seconds Level of Service D = By 5.0 seconds Level of Service E = By 2.0 seconds Level of Service F = By 1.0 seconds In the City of Lake Elsinore, the technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as the Intersection Delay Method (see Appendix D) based on the Highway Capacity Manual. To calculate delay, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. Signalized intersections are considered deficient (Level of Service F) if the overall intersection critical volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0, even if the level of service defined by the delay value is below the defined Level of Service standard. The Volume to Capacity ratio is defined as the critical volumes divided by the intersection capacity. A Volume to Capacity ratio greater than 1.0 implies an infinite queue. The Level of Service analysis for signalized intersections has been performed using optimized signal timing. This analysis has included an assumed lost time of four seconds per phase. Signal timing optimization has considered pedestrian safety and signal coordination requirements. Appropriate time for pedestrian crossings has also been considered in the signalized intersection analysis. Project trips are generated using rates and procedures contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012 and City of Fontana, Truck Trip Generation Study, August 2003. This traffic analysis has been prepared in accordance with the traffic impact analysis requirements. The project generated trips were added to the study area intersections, and a full intersection analysis was conducted, even when the project added traffic failed to meet the minimum thresholds that require an intersection analysis. 5 C. Mitigation Measures If a project is large enough to require that a traffic impact analysis be prepared, and if the project adds traffic to an intersection above a minimum threshold, and if the intersection is operating at above an acceptable level of operation, then the project must mitigate its traffic impact. Traffic mitigation can be in many forms including adding lanes. Lanes can sometimes be obtained through restriping or elimination of parking, and sometimes require spot roadway widening. R III. Project Description This section discusses the project's location and proposed development. Figure 1 shows the project location and Figure 2 illustrates the site plan. A. Location The project site is located adjacent to Hunco Way between Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street in the City of Lake Elsinore. B. Proposed Development The project is partially built and in operation with 152,405 square feet of light industrial proposed to be built via eight different buildings on currently vacant lots. The proposed project will have access to Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street via Hunco Way. C. Site Plan The following describes the proposed land use from a traffic engineering viewpoint: Light Industrial: Light Industrial facilities are free-standing facilities devoted to a single use. The facilities have an emphasis on activities other than manufacturing and typically have minimal office space. Typical light industrial activities include printing, material testing and assemblers of data processing equipment. General heavy industrial (Land Use 120), industrial park (Land Use 130) and manufacturing (Land Use 140) are related uses. D. Phasing and Timing The proposed project is anticipated for opening in 2016 and is proposed to be built in one phase. This traffic impact analysis is based upon two years of background traffic growth (2014-2016). 7 Figure 1 Project Location Map ft 5896a/1 IyU��ZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. UA'ER 6J ) i\RS OT I , Cl l LISVI bI RV R I Figure 2 Site Plan "V X' KUNZMANASSOCIATES, Inc. S896a/2 0, ii 35 Y,,,, or Exa [ it \i Shwa: IV. Existing Traffic Conditions Traffic conditions as they exist today are discussed below and illustrated on Figures 3 to 6. A. Study Area Appendix B includes the scoping agreement with City of Lake Elsinore staff. The study area includes the following intersections: Hunco Way (NS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) - #1 Pasadena Street (EW) - 42 Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) - #3 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - #4 Collier Avenue (EW) -#5 Pasadena Street (EW) -#6 B. Surrounding Street System Existing roadways within the study area include Hunco Way, Central Avenue, Collier Avenue, and Pasadena Street. Hunco Way: This north -south two-lane undivided to two-lane divided roadway is not classified on the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 1,200 to 4,800 vehicles per day in the study area. Central Avenue: This north -south two-lane undivided to six -lane undivided roadway is classified as an Augmented Urban Arterial (134 foot right-of-way) north of Collier Avenue and as a Major (100 foot right-of-way) between Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street on the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 200 to 38,800 vehicles per day in the study area. Collier Avenue: This east -west two-lane undivided to four -lane divided roadway is classified as a an Urban Arterial (120 foot right-of-way) west of Central Avenue and as a Major (100 foot right-of-way) east of Central Avenue on the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 8,800 to 21,300 vehicles per day in the study area. Pasadena Street: This east -west two-lane undivided to two-lane divided roadway is classified as a Secondary (90 foot right-of-way) on the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 500 to 700 vehicles per day in the study area. 10 C. Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls Figure 3 identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The number of through lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are identified. D. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 4 depicts the Existing average daily traffic volumes. The Existing average daily traffic volumes were obtained from the 2013 Traffic Volumes on the California State Highway System by the California Department of Transportation and were factored from peak hour counts obtained by Kunzman Associates, Inc. in November 2014 (see Appendix C) using the following formula for each intersection leg: PM Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 12 = Leg Volume. This is a conservative estimate and may over estimate the average daily traffic volumes. E. Existing Intersection Delay The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as the Intersection Delay Method (see Appendix D). To calculate delay, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. The existing delay and Level of Service for intersections in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 1. Existing delay is based upon manual weekday morning and evening peak hour counts made for Kunzman Associates, Inc. in November 2014 (see Figures 5 and 6). Traffic count worksheets are provided in Appendix C. There are two peak hours in a weekday. The morning peak hour is between 7 AM and 9 AM, and the evening peak hour is between 4 PM and 6 PM. The actual peak hour within the two hour interval is the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Explicit peak hour factors have been calculated using the data collected for this project. The study area intersections currently operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions. Existing delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. F. Existing City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Plan Figure 7 shows the current City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. Both existing and future roadways are included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and are graphically depicted on Figure 7. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the land use element of the General Plan. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan roadway cross- sections are illustrated on Figure 8. 11 G. Transit Service The study area is currently served by the Riverside Transit Agency Routes 22 and 206 along Central Avenue and Collier Avenue and Route 7 along Collier Avenue. 12 Table 1 Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service ' When a right turn lane Is designated, the lane can either be striped or un stuped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right taming vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; it = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, per 7.9.0215 (2008). Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall over Intersection delay and level of service are shown for Intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop 13 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic Delay - LOS' L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control' Hunco Way (NS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) - #1 TS 0.5 0.5 d 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 14.6-B 18.0-B Central Avenue INS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) - #3 TS 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 17.9-B 23.7-C I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) -#4 TS 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 19.4-13 42.0-D Collier Avenue (EW) - #5 TS 2 1.5 0.5 2 1 2> 2 2 1 1 1 1> 22.5-C 28.8-C Pasadena Street (EW) - #6 AWS 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 7.5-A I 7.7-A ' When a right turn lane Is designated, the lane can either be striped or un stuped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right taming vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; it = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, per 7.9.0215 (2008). Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall over Intersection delay and level of service are shown for Intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop 13 Figure 3 Existing Through Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls 5896a/3 K LINZN4AN ASSOClATLS, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. UV1IZ JS Y1 RS OILr( 'LLLiX1 tiiKN'IC1 14 Figure 4 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes tKUNZMAN Ac;soc IA I6S, INC, 5896a/4 OVI R 35 YIIAR', or Isa It SPRV K Ii is Figure 5 Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/5 it iVUNZMAN AssoclA TLS, INC. I Intersection reference numbers are in upper I eft corner of turning movement boxes. OVLF 35 Yves or EllaiI M Sli.^.\'ICI' 16 Figure 6 Existing Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/6 KUNZMAN Assoc[ATES, INC Intersection reference numbersarein upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Over, 35 Yenr.. o. Exceue:r Seiywcc 17 Figure 7 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element C^ te r u' @ s F k 1 Lro 71 �QZ10 �p _ pWll wls 3 L e�N nor 4 4`�s ao a: F t{ o� Legend «* AUG mi1ENTF1) k1irli A1111111AI S LANI'S) :'. -W t! It IIAN AR] I It [At (6 Lt t 1.4 i 11('' It.O W t $ryg Al,VOR I; I AN6S ! 100 IM IV., ' s`Sl WNDAIO 11 I ANI:.S i "0 Ikj),W, 1 (If I t::'IOR is IAN 1'I : 6n II,P AV i ,{tV 0 WWII 1) COI I It, fold,! LANI S N I I I I I'M I 131 [At Ai lt,'MI Nit 1) IN'f19U I t_I'IONti NfbV 111,[41. ROADWAY ltiWN 3.1 �»�e.:;'. Afilrfl �.Flrlfttl tl�ia. li Ci l l'60VNUNC! Source: City of Lake Elsinore 5896a/7 KUNZMAN AssounrFs, Inc. U1tia bi 1'IINL C,. L](:[i � L., Sl liV'ICI- 18 Figure 8 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Roadway Cross -Sections AUGMENTED URBAN ARTERIAL - STATE HIGHWAY D.LANG] 130 URBAN ARTERIAL_ HIGHWAY (Ii.LPNE) 1U0' tl0' L' 6' G I I TO 1 114 1 12 1 1. 1 G' G' G' MEDIAN MAJOR HIGHWAY �4.LANE) 90 ' ,6' BE I ACEI. I I --j `"I. SECONDARY HIGHWAY (4 -LANE) ]N' DIVIDED COLLECTOR DIKES USE SHOULDER (E-LANEf xx' I 1B COLLECTOR HIGHWAY ,.,A., KLINZMAN, A-sociA 11 INTEGi• TI 6' 6�13Tt3 IB NXtl G Fsry COLLECTOR HIGHWAY (2LANE) 6{%1' 4 1 1. 1 1K Vjil' 3 IE 1 0' 9' NEW SPECIAL ROADWAY ,.NRtlLOLR,tlx (2 -LAND) D'SOPOSED FOR LAKESHORE ORIV IN THE COUNTRY SLUR HEIGHT DISTRICT) 1 \)c. Source: City of Lake Elsinore Cvcr 35 l'r ells cr P''L I:I LI rSII"IcI: 19 5896a/8 V. Project Traffic The project is partially built and in operation with 152,405 square feet of light industrial proposed to be built via eight different buildings on currently vacant lots. The proposed project will have access to Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street via Hunco Way. A. Site Traffic 1. Trip Generation The trips generated by the project are determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of vehicles to drive, and life styles remain similar to what are known today. A major change in these variables may affect trip generation rates. Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land use. By multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic volumes are determined. Table 2 shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012 and City of Fontana, Truck Trip Generation Study, August 2003. As shown in Table 2, the proposed development is projected to generate approximately 1,348 daily vehicle trips in Passenger Car Equivalents, 181 in Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 187 in Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the evening peak hour. 2. Trip Distribution Figures 9 and 10 display the directional distributions of the project trips for the proposed land use. To determine the trip distributions for the proposed project, peak hour traffic counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of the site, and other additional information on future development and traffic impacts in the area were reviewed. 3. Trip Assignment Based on the identified trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 11. Morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes expected from the project are shown on Figures 12 and 13. 20 Modal Split The traffic reducing potential of public transit has not been considered in this report. Essentially the traffic projections are conservative in that public transit might be able to reduce the traffic volumes. 21 Table 2 Project (Light Industrial) Trip Generation' ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation, 9th Edl ti on, 2012, Land Use Category 110 and City of Fontan a, Truck Trlo 6eneratlon Studv August 2003. ' ISE =Thousand Square Feet Passenger Car Equivalent factors are recommended by San Bernardino Associated Governments. 22 Type of Vehicle Passenger 2 Axle 3 Axle 4+ Axle Total Descriptor Quantity Units' Car Truck Truck Truck Trucks Total Land Use: Light Industrial 152.405 TSF 78.6% 8.0% 3.9% 9.5% 21.4% 100% Traffic Generation Rates In trips per TSF Daily 5.478 0.558 0.272 0.662 1.492 6.97 Morning Peak Hour 0.723 0.074 0.036 0.087 0.197 0.92 Evening Peak Hour 1 0.762 0.078 0.038 0.092 0.208 0.97 Traffic Generation In Vehicles 835 85 41 101 227 1,062 Daily Morning Peak Hour Inbound 97 10 5 12 27 124 Outbound 13 1 1 2 4 17 Total 110 11 6 14 31 141 Evening Peak Hour Inbound 14 1 1 2 4 18 Outbound 102 10 5 12 27 129 Total 116 11 6 14 31 147 Passenger Car Equivalent's (PCE'S) Factor' 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 Traffic Generation in PCE's 835 128 82 303 513 1,348 Daily Morning Peak Hour Inbound 97 15 10 36 61 158 Outbound 13 2 2 6 10 23 Total 110 17 12 42 71 181 Evening Peak Hour Inbound 14 2 2 6 10 24 Outbound 102 15 10 36 61 163 Total 116 17 12 42 71 187 ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation, 9th Edl ti on, 2012, Land Use Category 110 and City of Fontan a, Truck Trlo 6eneratlon Studv August 2003. ' ISE =Thousand Square Feet Passenger Car Equivalent factors are recommended by San Bernardino Associated Governments. 22 Figure 9 Project Trip Distribution - Cars � 5896a/9 KLINZMAN ASsOGATES, INC. Ovui 35 Yisas or EYcia i cer Sl ZVI, 1 23 Figure 10 Project Trip Distribution - Trucks 5896a/10 Ku�.�zr�nn Associn rrs, lac. l,A Ln 9J 1 L.vp Vt LIRC LI i l KI b4RV'IC I-. 24 Figure 11 Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes tKUNZMAN /ASSOCIATES, INC. 5896a/11 Ovrra 35 YI'nas rn- Lei L' LI',eT SI[Fv'ICI, 25 Figure 12 Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes it5896a/12 KUNZMAN Assoc IA I ES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. UYCR 3S )11 %RS or IcXaI I I L� I Silo, I( I 26 Figure 13 Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/13 KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Oven 351h nrs ,117,ott,,i $irviie 27 --- I a�lb��v a a ldbb�o 2,� _ 5896a/13 KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Oven 351h nrs ,117,ott,,i $irviie 27 VI. Traffic Analysis A. Future Traffic 1. Method of Projection To assess future traffic conditions, project trips are combined with existing traffic, ambient growth, and other development. The opening year for analysis purposes in this report is 2016. 2. Other Development Table 3 lists the proposed land uses for the nearby development for opening year traffic conditions provided by the City of Lake Elsinore and County of Riverside Department of Transportation staff. Figure 14 shows the other development traffic analysis zone map. Table 3 shows the daily and peak hour vehicle trips generated by the surrounding approved development in the study area. Figures 15 to 22 contain the opening year directional distributions and assignment of the other development trips. Based on the identified opening year trip distributions for the other development on arterial highways throughout the study area, other development average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 23. Other development morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 24 and 25, respectively. 3. Ambient Growth To account for ambient growth on roadways, Opening Year (2016) traffic volumes have been calculated based on a 2.0 percent annual growth rate of existing traffic volumes over a two year period. B. Average Daily Traffic 1. Existing Plus Project For Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, existing traffic is combined with project traffic. Figure 26 shows the average daily traffic volumes that can be expected for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. 2. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Proiect For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions, existing traffic is combined with ambient growth and project traffic. Figure 27 shows the average daily traffic volumes that can be expected for Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions. M 3. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, existing traffic is combined with ambient growth and traffic from other development. Figure 28 shows the average daily traffic volumes that can be expected for Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions. 4. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, existing traffic is combined with ambient growth, project traffic, and traffic from other development. Figure 29 shows the average daily traffic volumes that can be expected for Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions. C. Delay and Level of Service Analysis A complete explanation and calculation of intersection delay and Level of Service worksheets for all future traffic scenarios is included in Appendix D. 1. Existing Plus Project The Existing Plus Project delay and Levels of Service for the study area roadway network are shown in Table 4. Table 4 shows delay values based on the geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Existing Plus Project morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 30 and 31, respectively. For Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours. Existing Plus Project delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. 2. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project The Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project delay and Levels of Service for the study area roadway network are shown in Table 5. Table 5 shows delay values based on geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 32 and 33, respectively. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour, without improvements: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - 44 29 For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions and with improvements, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. 3. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative The Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative delay and Levels of Service for the study area roadway network are shown in Table 6. Table 6 shows delay values based on geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 34 and 35, respectively. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour, without improvements: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - #4 For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions and with improvements, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. 4. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative The Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative delay and Levels of Service for the study area roadway network are shown in Table 7. Table 7 shows delay values based on geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 36 and 37, respectively. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service during the evening peak hour, without improvements: Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) -#4 For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions and with improvements, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. 30 Table 3 Other Development Trip Generation' Toff¢ Estimate,] Peak l lour Morning Evening Analysis Completion Inbound OUtboond Total rebound Outbound Fuel Zone Site Land Use Quantity In 2016 Units' Dally Circle K Se Mra Station Service Station W/ Convenience Market 10 100% FP 51 49 100 60 58 118 1,299 Lakeshore Pointe Single Family Detached Residential 32 25% DO 3 5 8 5 3 8 75 1 Apartments 161 25% DO 5 18 23 15 B 23 268 Vlllege at Lakeshore SP 163 25% DU 3 15 18 15 8 23 238 Subtotal 62 87 149 95 77 172 1,080 2 Cottage]ane SP 48 25% DU 3 8 11 8 5 13 115 Single Family Detached Residential 11 100% DU 2 6 8 ) 4 11 105 Lakeshore Village SPI Apartments 153 25% DU 5 15 20 15 8 23 255 3 Specialty Retail 1.550 100% TSF 1 1 2 1 2 3 89 Wake Rider Beach Resort' 100% 77 55 132 85 65 150 2081 Subtotal 85 )) 162 108 79 18) 2,480 4 Tractor Supply Tractor Supply Store 18.800 101 TSF 16 12 261 131 14 27 585 5 Fairway Business Park Industrial Park 1).21 101 AC 117 24 141 31 116 147 1,053 Single" Family Detached Residential 243 259 DU 12 34 46 38 23 61 578 Multi Family Attached Residential 247 25% DO 6 25 31 25 14 39 411 Colinas Del Oro Shopping Center 69,5 25% TSP 19 12 31 56 61 117 1,340 Pass -By (15%) -3 "2 -5 9 18 -201 Internal Capture 11%) -4 "4 -8 -30 10 -20 -234 Subtotal 30 65 95 100 79 179 1,894 TR 36624 Single -Family Detached Rmldentlal 75 25% DU 4 11 15 12 7 19 179 6 TR 32537 Single Family Detached Residential 70 25% DU 4 30 14 11 3 14 167 TR 35422. Single -Family Detached Residential 199 25% DU10 28 38 32 19 51 474 TR 31593 Single -Family Detached Residential 490 25% DU 69 23 92 78 46 124 1,162 Spyglass Ranch SP 456 25% DU 65 22 87 72 43 115 1,085 PM 34821 Single -Family Detached Residential 1 100% DO 0 1 3 1 0 3 10 END35543 Single Family Detached Residential 2 100% DO 0 1 3 1 1 3 19 Subtotal 182 161 343 307 198 505 4,996 7 PM 33660 Single" Family Detached Residential 3 100% DO 1 2 3 2. 1 3 29 PM 36057 Single Family Detached Residential 3 100% DO 1 2 3 2 1 3 29 Subtotal 2 4 6 4 2 6 58 8 PM 24290 Soccer Fields 3 100% F 2 2 4 43 19 62 214 Total 469 3)5 844 609 510 1,119 11,381 _ourre. ier,t, of u—'sandan"I In eeo,T,g mtmryxd1d,L1durn eadulell l Eo, 2lp,➢n, ip, sly, baa, -d EC _T11fLC ]mW ]mood bdl drI pa•N m by Kun n."ooea ahIn,,, Oata'er 31, 2014. Infino, E.1 ro 15P 114TnIIIC Enda ch Mal Ar Self pr aorad by Kuneman Ass«In hes Inc., lams.. V 2, 2014. Fe r"'lllna Odslean; Ohl a in's,", llm.- TSF-Tbavaand Spnaid reit 11 A11d; F -ricld I ne h a]acne,, eirl Spntlhk Emn le Pallidly in I mI End " lin, nt th, J, ldp m ¢^I mmelM,C In Ed a um ba[11 c1 ormnmml,nm land er 4u ^nlns 4esndm m and el,dde, Elao. puce rov, in E,E,dtmn rn, I,Isknaadlbirch o—Av,,pmemmhand City d( LEE, do,... lymm.4 Odpenmul uElf mbo innal nhhdndndnemsnnlnb,dol End bas Mnn tuna m d lasdmn neminnm dmntwmcs Fund in Iles 1LIC f'L 4IIE., -in 1'., Edo mermenpbhyp e an odd u1d4,adde1 m the "i 31 Table 4 Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstrlped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through l ares. 1. = Left;'I= Through; R = Right; d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap; l = Improvement ' Delay and Level of Service has been calculated us Ing the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215120081. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average Intersection delay and l evel of service a to shown for intersections with traffic sign al or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' IS -Traffic Signal; CSS =Cross Street Stop; AWS =All Way Stop 32 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic Delay - LOS' L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control' Hunco Way INS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) -#1 TS 0.5 0.5 d 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 16.2-8 18.3-8 Pasadena Street (EW) - #2 CSS 0 0 0 0_5 0 0_5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 8.5-A 8.6-A Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) -p3 TS 1 3 0 C 3 1 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 17.6-13 26.5-C 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - 94 TS 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 20.6-C 47.1-D Collier Avenue (EW) -#5 TS 2 1.5 0.5 2 1 2> 2 2 1 1 1 1> 22.4-C 31.4-C Pasadena Street (EW) -#6 AWS I 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 7.6-A 7.9-A When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstrlped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through l ares. 1. = Left;'I= Through; R = Right; d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap; l = Improvement ' Delay and Level of Service has been calculated us Ing the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215120081. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average Intersection delay and l evel of service a to shown for intersections with traffic sign al or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' IS -Traffic Signal; CSS =Cross Street Stop; AWS =All Way Stop 32 Table 5 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstdped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for nght turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. I. = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap; i = Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version ].9.0215(2008), Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS =Traffic Signal; CSS - Cross Street Stop; AWS =All Way Stop ° 99.9-F = Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 33 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Delay - LOS' Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Hunco Way INS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) -#1 TS 0.5 0.5 d 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 16.3-B 18.7-13 Pasadena Street (EW) - #2 es5 0 0 0 0_5 0 0_5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 8.5-A 8.6-A Central Avenue INS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) -#3 TS 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 19.3-13 29.1-C I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) -#4 - Without Improvements TS 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 22.5-C 99.9-F" - With Improvements TS 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 22.0-C 45.1-D Collier Avenue (EW) - #5 TS 2 1.5 0.5 2 1 2> 2 2 1 1 1 1> 23.0-C 33.0-C Pasadena Street (EW) - #6 AWS 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 7.6-A 7.9-A When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstdped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for nght turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. I. = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap; i = Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version ].9.0215(2008), Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS =Traffic Signal; CSS - Cross Street Stop; AWS =All Way Stop ° 99.9-F = Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 33 Table 6 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Intersection Delay and Level of Service ' When a right turn lane Is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstrlped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T =Through; R = Right d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlafi= Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated Laing the following analysis software; Train , Version 7.9.0215 (20081. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane( are shown. ' TS =Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop; AWS = All Way Stop 99.9-F= Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 34 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic Delay - LOS' Intersection Controla L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Hunco Way INS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) -41 TS 0.5 0.5 d 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 14.4-B 18.7-B Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) -43 TS 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1.5 0 7..5 19.6-B 3(.7-C 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) - #4 - Without Improvements TS 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 25.4-C 99.9-F° - With Improvements TS 0 3 1>> 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 22.4-C 40.2-D Collier Avenue (EW) -X5 TS 2 1.5 0.5 2 1 2> 2 2 1 1 1 1> 23.9-C 34.9-C Pasadena Street (EW) -HIS AWS 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 7.8-A 7.7-A ' When a right turn lane Is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstrlped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T =Through; R = Right d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlafi= Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated Laing the following analysis software; Train , Version 7.9.0215 (20081. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all ways top control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane( are shown. ' TS =Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop; AWS = All Way Stop 99.9-F= Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 34 Table 7 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Intersection Delay and Level of Service When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or uncolped. To function as a right turn lane there must be suffident width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T ='fb rough; R = Right; or = De Facto Right Tun; > =flight Turn Overlaal = Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software'. Traits, Version 7.9 0215 (2008). Far the Highway Capacity Manual,overall average l ntersection delay and level of service are shown for Intersections with tafflc signal or all ways top control. For Intersections with crass street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement for movements sharing a single lane) are shown. TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop; AWS = All way Stop ' 99.9-F= Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 35 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Delay - LOS' L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control' Hunco Way (NS) at: Collier Avenue (EW) - 41 TS 0.5 0.5 it 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 16.1-B 19.0-B Pasadena Street (EW) - #2 c5s 0 0 0 0_5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 8.5-A 8.6-A Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) -#3 TS 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 20.3-C 32.6-C 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) -#4 - Without Improvements TS 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 26.5-C 99.9-F° - With Improvements TS 0 3 1>> 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 22.9-C 43.2-D Collier Avenue (EW) - #5 TS 2 1.5 0.5 2 1 2> 2 2 1 1 1 1> 23.8-C 38.9-D Pasadena Street (EW) -#6 AWS 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 7.8-A 7.9-A When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or uncolped. To function as a right turn lane there must be suffident width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T ='fb rough; R = Right; or = De Facto Right Tun; > =flight Turn Overlaal = Improvement Delay and Level of Service has been calculated using the following analysis software'. Traits, Version 7.9 0215 (2008). Far the Highway Capacity Manual,overall average l ntersection delay and level of service are shown for Intersections with tafflc signal or all ways top control. For Intersections with crass street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement for movements sharing a single lane) are shown. TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop; AWS = All way Stop ' 99.9-F= Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service F. 35 Figure 14 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone Map 5896a/14 Ku��z�an�i AssocinTes, INC. Uvl rt dy Y1111, of Eecu i i_ni s, Rvice 36 Figure 15 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 1 Trip Distribution it 5896a/15 I<u��znnnn� Associn�r�s, Inc. 0\', 35 1a 37 Figure 16 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 2 Trip Distribution it5896a/16 I�UNZI�AAI�1 ASSOCIATES, INC Ul 'i IR 3i vlAIiS or I AOI LLLNI g1 R VI C i 38 Figure 17 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 3 Trip Distribution 5896a�17 KU��ZI�AAN ASSOCInTe� INC. ON i a 3ti li1s 39 Figure 18 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 4 Trip Distribution 5896a/18 KUNZ�AAN AssocinTLs, lac. Ov[r.35 VwRa or LV, III Ill SI lR ll I 40 Uv i 35 Visors ni Liu ue�r ticrvi� r. 41 Figure 20 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 6 Trip Distribution it 6896a/20 KUNZMAN ASSOLInTES, INC. Uw:a 3s 11,vw, or Lsc i t i i \ i 42 Figure 21 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 7 Trip Distribution KUNZNAAN AssocIATEs, INC. 589ea/21 43 Figure 22 Other Development Traffic Impact Analysis Zone 8 Trip Distribution 5896a/22 KUNZ�AAN Assoun�r�s, l;��c. Uv6R J� Yl ,%R5 or L�aIi1 1 bi kVlk 1 44 Figure 23 Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes 5896a/23 Ku��znnn�� Associ��r�r , lac. Ow:w 35 Y nas or E4CC1 i i '�= ';I RVI 45 Figure 24 Other Development Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/24 it \'UNZNAAN AssoclAITS, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Uvea i Y€,acs of Leo... .. Seaw<i 46 Figure 25 Other Development Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/25 it �'KUNZNAAN AssoctATES, INGC. I ntersection reference num be rs are in upper I eft corner of turning movement boxes. Ovm 35 Vi_nrc or IS:,rv¢ 47 Figure 26 Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes it 6896a/26 KUNLMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Uv[a SD YcnuS w Iac[i �[�i bur �ncc 48 Figure 27 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes 5896a/27 I�unzMnN Asso�inTts, lnc. O�ir,3h Yi_%w, ,i :,i i I I,r Scr.�r:c 49 Figure 28 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Average Daily Traffic Volumes it 5896a/28 Ku�zntiAN AssocinrEs, INC. OVER 35 \ I AR, or I 'III i i_vr Srrvn-i: 50 Figure 29 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Average Daily Traffic Volumes it 5896a/29 IVUNZMI�N ASSOCIATGS, INC. Ovi is 35 Y[nis ur Cv I I i 1 1 51 Figure 30 Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 139 4 3 � 2316 2173 0 147io - Wr J l r { s 4-19 3 2 4-19 R 3m =420 4 Y 139 4 2316 2173 0 147io - 115 4-19 `a 2 4-19 R 3m =420 4 4-0 4-298 m 4-15 5 6 " X562 a-I'�e'� 4 J� �O �0 4 b a 4� b lc V ms'o0xa353,o 0 4 0 247= m�o0 D 893 o�525 ,p P 21� qs P �� 28� 03 0, �' V 241-a 0 _ 0 1064 o 1290 e 14'v o 6 5896a/30 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Ov, R 35 Yrnl{s or EN, 1, , S,, ogcr 52 Figure 31 Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 58968/31 KUNZMA N Assoc l A FES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes... Over. 35 V enas or f ei r i i r� r Sritvier. 53 Figure 32 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/32 KUNZMAN ASSoc IATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movementboxes. OVER 35 1'1nes or Lxirurnr S cvm 54 Figure 33 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/33 KUNZMAN AssoclATLS, INC. Intersection reference numbersareln upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Owaa 3515:nrs of E�c-u ii.0 tie:vi�c 55 Figure 34 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/34 KUNZMAN Assoc lATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. UA9112 d� YLAI�ti pP L]C'LLLI:AT Slat V9Cr 56 Figure 35 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/35 it KUNZMAN Assoc[AI-ES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVCR 35 Y4 vz-, or FxY , I l r,i 3cr via- 57 Figure 36 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 5896a/36 KLINZMAN AssoclA I [5, INC Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. uver. ,.as or 1,,1111 1 Sciavu-i_ 58 Figure 37 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes _ 5896a/37 i�LlNZNAA�� ASsoclA_1 ES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. Ovrn 35 V'ws or E,c i i rcw Survia- 59 VII. Recommendations On-site improvements and improvements adjacent to the site will be required in conjunction with the proposed development to ensure adequate circulation within the project itself (see Figure 38). A. Roadway Improvements 1. On- Site Construct Pasadena Street from the west project boundary to the east project boundary at its ultimate half -section width including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, as necessary. The site should provide sufficient parking spaces to meet City of Lake Elsinore parking code requirements in order to service on-site parking demand. On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. Sight distance at project accesses should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans must be reviewed by the City and approved as consistent with this measure prior to issue of grading permits. 2. Off -Site As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Lake Elsinore should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. INN Figure 38 Circulation Recommendations , Construct Pasadena Street from the west project boundary to the east project boundary at its ultimate half -section width including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, as necessary. The site should provide sufficient parking spaces to meet City of Lake Elsinore parking code requirements in order to service on-site parking demand. on-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction withl detailed construction plans for the project. Sight distance at project accesses should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street Improvement plans. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans must be reviewed by the City and approved as consistent with this measure prior to issue of grading permits. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Lake Elsinore should periodically review traffic operations In the vicinity of the project once the project Is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. KUNZMAN ASSOLIA I ES, INC. ON 35 YiAiu or 1=1a cu;xi S1 Ky1a1 61 Legend = Traffic Signal s1b1• = Stop Sign = Pull Access Driveway 5896a/38 Appendices Appendix A — Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix 8 — City of Lake Elsinore Scoping Agreement Appendix C — Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix D — Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Delay APPENDIX A Glossary of Transportation Terms GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic -actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI -MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN -DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN -LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC -ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home are two trips, not one. TRIP -END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. APPENDIX B City of Lake Elsinore Scoping Agreement REVISED SCOPWQ A(5RFEMEN1 FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 'this letter acknowledges the City of Lake Elsinore Transportation Department requirements for traffic impact analysis of the following project, The analysis must follow the Riverside County Transportation Department Traffic Study Guidelines dated April 2009. Case No. T a Related Cases - SP No. EIR. No.. GPA No. CZ No. _.�_. ------- Project Name: PasadenaLodustriai Pro ect Project Address: Adjacent to FEunco Wad betaeeen Cnitier Auenun and Pasadena §treat �„_.,,,,______„_„-,�„___ Project Description: 15240 ssnuare feet of lig ht Industria! _ OAKI ant Develo era Name: KEINZMAN. ASSOCIATES�INC. RAWLINGS COMPANY REALTY ADVISORS Address: 1111 Town & Country Suite 34 P.O. Box 96 OrangeCA 92868 M'urdeta CA 92564 Telephone; 714 973.8383 ,_„__ __. LM) 667-$152 A. Trip Generation Source. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trin Generation 9th Edition 2012 Current GP Land Use Limited industrial Proposed Land Use Limited industrial Current Zoning Limited Industrial Proposed Zoning Limited industrial Current Trip Generation Proposed Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total AM Trips 0 0 D 158 23 181 PM Trips 0 — 6 0 74 163 287 Internal Trip Allowance Yes 0 L/. Trip Discount) (see Attached) Pass -By Trip Allowance Yes N i._%Trip Discount) 8Trip Geographic Distribution: N —40150 % S 45/35 % E__!§ !15 % W__910 % (See attached exhibit for detailed asslonment) Cars/Trucks ErsjTrud. Cars/Trucks Cars/Trucks C. Background Traffic Project Build-outYear,.__201b Annual Ambient Growth Rate: 2 Phase Year(s) _,T._J. Other area projects to be analysed: CircleK. Wkcshore Pointe, Viliag at Lakeshore SP, Cottage Lane S„P� Lakeshore Village SP, Wake Rider Beach Resort, Tractor Supp It Fairway 6P, Colinas Dei OrotTF;_36624 TR 37537. TR 3!,a22, TR31593 Spvvlass Ranch SP PM 34821 PM 35543 PM 33660 PM 36057 and PM 24290 Model/Forecast methodology D. Study intersections: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, bip generation and distribution are determined, or coinments from other agencies.) W p__k' 1. ilunco Way")/ Collier Avenue 0!"-#1. 2. Hunco way (R51/ Pasadena Street :-tt2 I Central Avenue yvs)Jl-IS Freeva amps E+C>46)-83 4. Central Avenue (tosyl I-15 Freewa amps(}) -N3 5. Central Avenue +jV*J Collier Avenue G. Central Avenue (,In)/ Pasadena Street(EWJ - Nb {t IS E. Study Roadway Segments: ° F. Other Jurisdictional Impacts Is this project within a City's Sphere of Influence or one -mile radius of City boundaries? El No If so, name of CityJurisdiction: County of Riverside G. Site Plan (See attached reduced copy) H. Specific issuesto be addressed In the Study On addition to the standard analysis described in the Guideline) (To be filled out by Transportation Department):. Existing Conditions Traffic count data must be new or recent. Provide traffic count dates if using other than new counts. Date of counts _ New Recommended by: Vrvan Crawford Associate _ �s Consultant's Representative Scoping Agreement Submitted on October 28_201d Revised on November 19 2014 Approved Scoping Agreement: City of take Elsinore Transportation Department "5896a ®etabar .8, 2014 Date iS Daze Table 1 Project (Light Industrial) Trip Generation' ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation. 9th Edition, 2012, Land Use Category 110 and Truck Trio Generation Study City of Fontana, August 2001 T5F= Thousand Square Feet Passenger Car Equivalent factors are recommended by San Bernardino Associated Governments. Type of Vehicle Passenger 2 Axle 3 Axle 4+ Axle Total Descriptor Quantity Units' Car Truck Truck Truck Trucks Total Land Use: Light Industrial 152.405 TSF 78.6% 8.0% 3.9% 9.5% 21.4% 100% Traffic Generation Rates in tris per TSF 5.478 0.558 0.272 0.662 1.492 6.97 Daily Morning Peak Hour 0.723 0.074 0.036 0.087 0.197 0.92 Evening Peak Hour 1 0.762 0.078 0.038 0.092 E. 0.97 Traffic Generation in Vehicles 835 85 41 101 227 1,062 Daily Morning Peak Hour Inbound 97 10 5 12 27 124 Outbound 13 1 1 2 4 17 Total 110 11 6 14 31 141 Evening Peak Hour Inbound 14 1 1 2 4 18 Outbound 102 10 5 12 27 129 Total 116 11 6 14 31 147 Passenger Car Equivalent's (PCE'S) Factor' 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 Traffic Generation in PCE's 835 128 82 303 513 1,348 Daily Morning Peak Hour Inbound 97 15 10 36 61 158 Outbound 13 2 2 6 10 23 Total 110 17 12 42 71 181 Evening Peak Hour Inbound 14 2 2 6 10 24 Outbound 102 15 30 36 61 163 Total 116 17 1 12 42 71 187 ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation. 9th Edition, 2012, Land Use Category 110 and Truck Trio Generation Study City of Fontana, August 2001 T5F= Thousand Square Feet Passenger Car Equivalent factors are recommended by San Bernardino Associated Governments. Figure 1 Project Location Map tr 5896/1 KUNZMAN ASSOGATES, 1Nc. Ovu: 35 V[vac or E�cn uwr S,w,cc Figure 2 Site Plan r� AII a s a '� ✓�� i% \ l `4 5896/2 KuNZMAn1 Associn rEs, INC. Ovrr, 35 W,w, of Eca i r, i S,,iv i Figure 3 Project Trip Distribution - Cars it 5896/3 1<u;�z�nnn AssocinTcs, INc. 0",,i YI'I", JgIVAuIL, SmVIQ Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution - Trucks it 5896/4 ItLINZMAI�� ASSOCIiATES, INC. Ovca 35 VI vTis or V,s , I INT SCHv I, I APPENDIX C Traffic Count Worksheets INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AImTD LLC. lel: 951 249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com Collier Avenue WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Collier Avenue 1 I SOUTH SIDE Hunco Way BICYCLE DATE: LOCATION: HIS Lake Elsinore ES i WS TOTAL PRO3ECT H: SC0476 Thu, Nov 6, 14 NORTH & SOUTH b I luno Way 0 0 00 LOCATION A: 4 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 0_ O EAST & WEST : 0 Cdr(l (Avenue 0 0 0 CONTROL: SIGNAL 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 NOTES: 0 0 0 0 0 0'-0-- 0 0-_- 1l=iAld 0. 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM N o o 0 00`:0 W f 00 MD 0 OTHM S OTHER NORTHBOUND UTHB UND EA B N WESTBOUND U-TURNS a a a o::�.�� eoum. n.eni:e LANES: NL 0 NT 1 NR 0 SL 1 ST 1 SR 1 CL 1 2 ER 0 WL 1 WT 2 WR 0 TOTAL NB X 5B EB WB X X X TTL 7.00 AM__ 15 4 17 7:15 AM o 0- 1 25- - - 0 8 10 190 1 3 163 409_- 730 AM 0 0- 3 12 _ 1 10 14 187 2 11 133 _-8 _4 377 _ 745 AM 0 0-- 4 25 0 12 12 190 5 14 143 �3 408 800 AM 1 1 6 34 1 11 16 -164 5 -9 123 4---- 375 0 0 0 0 I 0 815 AM 1 4 2 39_- 3 14 19 150 3 Il 1-3-7-- _ _ 6 309_ 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ _ 8 30 AM I _ 0_ 4 33 0 14 32 j 148 2 - 2 __ - 130 10 381 i _-- _ 8:45 AM 4 1- 6 53 1 1124 156 2 4 119 i 1 382 0 0 0 0 0 a V LUMES 7 6 28 238 6 88 1 0 1,33522 63 1,121 44 3,089 1 0 0 0 1 APPROACH % 17K, 150, 68% 72/0 2% 27% 9% 90% 1% 51h 91% 4% APP/DEPART 42 / 180 332 / 92 1,487 / 1,601 1,228 / 1,216 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 7:15 AM VOLUMES 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 1,569 APPROACH% 6% 6% 881/0 69170 1% 29% 7% 92% 2% 6% 91% 3% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.755 0.961 0.888 0.959 APP/DEPART 16 72 139 / 52 796 / 841 618 J 604 0 4:00 PM 2 - a o o B a -_-415PM— 2 --0-_-I 8 -66_ 1 0 25 32 23] 4 4 _ 212_ 7 597 _-- 4:30 PM 4 1 13 76 0 21 23 230 2 -_13 245 5 633 _ 4:45 PM 7 0 ] 58- 2 29 20 208 2 _ 7 _ _ 191 5 536 5 00 PM 5 _- 3 iEl 47 - 0 30 23 243 3 209 6 _ 604 1 0 0 0 1 _ 5:15 PM 4 _ 0 -_ 19 56 0 25 15 206 0 _1] 18 _ 238 2 _ 583 5 30 PM 6 1_-_ 9 50- 0 2819 224 3_ 207 4 558 ___ 5.45 PM 4 1 14 40 0 23 28 207 1 _� 6 i 200 5 537 a VOLUMES 34 7 102 468 8 205 18] 1,]65 17 84 1,]21 36 4,639 5 0 0 0 5 APPROACH % 24% 5% 71% 69% 1% 30% 9%. 90% 10, 5% 93% 2% APP/DEPART 148 / 230 1 601 / 119 1,969 / 2,335 1,841 / 1,960 0 BEGIN PEAK OR 9:15 PM VOLUMES 18 4 96 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 2,370 APPROACH % 26% 6"/0 68% 70% 1% 30% 10% 89% 1% 4/0 93% 2% PEAK FIR FACFOR 0.654 0.912 0.940 0.875 0.936 APP DEPART 68 / 125 354 / 59 1,027 / 1,21 921 980 0 Hunco Way NORTH SIDE Collier Avenue WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Collier Avenue 1 I SOUTH SIDE Hunco Way BICYCLE CROSSIN GS HIS SS ES i WS TOTAL 0 O i 0 b 0 0 0 00 0_ 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 0_ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'-0-- 0 0-_- 0 0. 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01010 o o 0 00`:0 0 0 00 0 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC tel: 951 249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com I-15 Freeway WB Ramps WEST SIDE EAST SIDE I-15 Freeway WB Ramps ! 1 �--'-- SOUTH SIDES Central Avenue BICYCLE DATE: LOCATION: 55 Lake Elsinore I TOTAL 0 0 PROJECT H: SCO476 0 -- 0 0 l o -o_-- Thu, Nov 6, 14 NORTH & SOUTH: Central Avenue 0 LOCATION If: 1 -0- o o: o o- 0 0 EAST & WEST: 0 615 Freeway WE Ramps 0 0 0 CONTROL SIGNAL 0 0 0 -0 0 NOTES: 00 0 0 0o p'; nM<.. A 0---0 o o o__� 0_.. 0 0 0 0 0--0 _ 0 1 0 0,0 0 PH N MD '.: AW E� rGRHIR S N kHHBQUN0 SOUTHBOUND A WESTBOUND U-TURNS � <em,ai a.enie - e nmY wn x3mp. : sr - rc[W we namR NL IT NR SL ST SR H� ET J ER WL NIT WR TOTAL NB SB E8 > WB TTL LANES: 1 3 X 0 3 1 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 X X X X AM 11 ( 4 0___ 5 7:15 AM 17 291. _,I 0 0 530 146" 0 _ "0 j 0 59 0 _ 98 1,141 7:30 AM 17 247 0 0 306 92 - _- 0 -_ 0 0 _ 0 111 964/:45 _ _ AM - 21 181 I 0 _ _ 0 372 125_- _ _ 0 0 0 0 104 0 195 948 8 00 AM 29 193 - _ 0 .62 118 0 _ 0 0 106 0 179 806_ B IS AM 21 159 0 _ 0- _ 235 _ _ 12] 0 -0-7-0 106 0 152 800__ 8:30 AM 26 - - 140 0 0-- 239 102 0 0 0 101 0 119 "_- g 8:45 AM 20 186 0 0 93 0 0 - 0 -765 0 _ _ _ 101- _ _777 G VOLUMES 1 5 0 0 ,719 ,71 1 0 D 0 7 6 71 ,728 7, 1 21 0 0 1 0 0 APPROACH % 9% 9 91% 0% 79°/0 0% 0% 0a 0% APP/DEPART 1,827 / 2,636 3,650 ,65 / ,48 3,489 0 / 0 ,73 1,736 / ,09 1,093 0 BEGIN PEAK HR ]: AM VOLUMES 66 987 0 0 1,801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 4,072 APPROACH % 6% 94% 0% 0% 79% 21% NO 0"/0 0% 42% 0% 58% PEAK HR FACI OR 0.855 0.848 0.000 0,730 0.892 APP/DEPART 1 053 1,407 2 292 2108 0 / 0 727 / 557 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 _ 4.15 PM _ I 10 41 4 45-P _ 367 0 0 273 82 0 0 0 110 0 J ` 163 1,032 0 PM 30 1 492"" _ 140 1,029 0 0_ -5105 PM 34 0 0 369 81_ 0 0- 0---_ D4 0 0 - 5:30RAF36 915 -0 0 353 79- 0 0- 0 1 1,198 _ 5 45 PM 32 316 0 _ 0 320 97 0 0- 0 _ 88 8 2 _147 136 A, VOLUME 269 2,923 0 0 2,698 0 0 0 848 4 5157 ,991 8,591 59 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH 1% 9/ 00% 20 0% 0Yo 0% 0% APP/DEPART 3,192 ,1 / 4,000 ,0 3,390 ,3 / 3,546 ,54 0 / 0 ,00 2,009 / 965 965 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM VOLUMES 137 1,633 0 0 1,307 336 0 0 0 956 2 602 4,473 APPROACH % 0% 921/. 0% 0% 80% 20% 0% 0% 0% 43% 0% 57% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.905 0.913 0.000 0.967 0.957 APP/DEPART 1,770 / 2,235 1,643 1,763 0 / 0 1,060 475 0 Central Avenue , NORTH SIDE -L I-15 Freeway WB Ramps WEST SIDE EAST SIDE I-15 Freeway WB Ramps ! 1 �--'-- SOUTH SIDES Central Avenue BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS 55 ES WS I TOTAL 0 0 0 0 o 0 -- 0 0 l o -o_-- 0-- 0_-- 0 o{ -0- o o: o o- 0 0 0_1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 00 0 0 0o e 0---0 o o o__� 0_.. 0 0 0 0 0--0 _ 0 1 0 0,0 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: A6nTD LLC. tel: 951 249 3226 pacificopalnttd.com 1-15 DATE; ---I LOCATION, WEST SIDE 1 Lake Elsinore EAST SIDE 1 I-15 Freeway EB PROJECT A: SCO476 -.. 8:00 AM 8:15 AM - SOUTH SIDE---+ 8:30 AM Thu, Nov 6, 14 NORTH & SOUTH: Central Avenue --415 PM -- LOCATION #: 2 4:45 PM 2 6 5.00 PM sas PM 5:30 PM EAST & WEST: 115 Freeway EB Romps CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES; "{AMS-:: PM N Pio OTNLRE 5 OTIERE N 1H8 ND I2rns UB TH@nlral UND E B UND E B U D U-TURNS ten.rn�� memo r wav mmp* r r/+vE pamps SWT NL NT NR SL ST SR EL 1 ET OR WL WR TOTAL NO 58 EB WB TTL LANES: X 2 1 2 2 % 1.3 0.3 1.3 X x % X X X X AM 0 202 78 195 352 79 3 _ _ 715 AM _ 0 245 111 226 363 0 63 � 44 0 0 -0 1,00 52 730 AM 0 206 195 239- 274 0_ 57 2 53 -_0 0 0 954 _ 7 95 AM 0 151 133 _ 169 306 0 - 53�_ 50 0 -0 862 - 800 AM 0 167_'_ 119 _ 144 219 0 49 _ _ I 47_ 0 _0 0 - _ --0 796 - - _ 815 AM 0 132..E 103 229 42 36_ 0 0 ` 0 652_- _ 830 AM 0 131, 97 _ID9 129 208 __0- 0 34 _I .0, 33 0 0 0 632 g _ &45 AM 0 158 112 --154 ll] 0 47 1 _- 31 _ _ 0 _ 0 0 680 VOLUMES 1,392 93 1,345 2,133 419 5 333 0 0 0 ,520 APPROACH% 0% 61% 39% 39% 61% 0% 55/a 1% 44/0 V/p 0% 0% APP/DEPART 2,285 / 1,811 3,478 / 2,466 757 / 2,243 0 / 0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 7:00 AM VOLUMES 0 804 467 809 1,295 0 247 2 186 0 0 0 3,810 APPROACH % 0% 63% 37% 381% 62% 0% 57% 1% 43% 0"/o 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.893 0.893 0.946 0.000 0.905 APP/DEPART 1 1,271 / 1,051 2,101 / 1,481FO% 3 278 0 / 0 0 4:00 PM 0 236 - 5 168 82 0 31 0 0 0 976- 0 0 0 0 09 30 PM 0 251 143 198 756 0 - __ 40_ 0 0 0 1,001_ 0 0 0- _ 0 95 PM 0 263 128 _ _ 168 219 _ _ 0 _-- 35 0 0 0 0 _04 0__5 0 0 947 00 PM 0 300. 128 220 220 0 - 37- _� 0 0 0 1,095 0 0 0 0 0 PM 0 281 125 218 251 0 2 _ 39 0 0 0 1,061 0 0 0 0 0- _5:15 5:30PM 0 304. 95 225_ 298 0 0- 350 1,054 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 225 2,103 118 1,025 1720 1,572 1,964 0 3 6 29 281 0 0 0 0 6 0 904 8,033 0 0 0 0 0-" 0 0 0 0aVOLUMES 0APPROACH % 0% 67% 33% 44% 56% 0%% 21% D/ 0% 0APP/DEPART 3,128 / 3,185 3,536 / 2,245/ 2,603 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 4;45 PM VOLUMES 0 1,148 476 831 933 0 621 2 146 0 0 0 4,157 APPROACH% 0°G, 71% 29% 47% 53% 0% 81% 0% 19% 0% 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.949 0.932 0.847 0.000 0.999 APP/DEPART 162-9 / 1,769 1,764 1,079 Central Avenue 769 / 1,309 0 0 0 NORTH SIDE -- 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps WEST SIDE 1 15 AM EAST SIDE 1 I-15 Freeway EB Ramps i a -.. 8:00 AM 8:15 AM - SOUTH SIDE---+ 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL -1 Central Avenue 7:00 AM 15 AM 7 30 AM -- 7:45 AM -- i a -.. 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL 400 PM --415 PM -- _ __. 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 2 6 5.00 PM sas PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAI. INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY AveTD LLC. tel: 951 249 3226 pacific(aaimtd.com Collier Avenue WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Collier Avenue 1 SOUTH SIDE - Central Avenue , BICYCLE DATE: LOCATION: NS Lake Elsinore I ES 11 WS I TOTAL PROJECT #: SCO476 0 0 0 0 0 1 0� 0 Thu, Nov 6, 14 NORTH & SOUTH: j. 0 Cemrel Avenue 0 0 0 LOCATION al: 3 0_ - 0 ,__ 0 EAST & WEST: 0 Collier Avenue 0 1 0 0 CONTROL: -0----0--0 SIGNAL lo i 0 -o 0 - 0 0 010'0 NOTES -y;1 0 o a o 0 hMHW N 0 00!0 0 MeDA"s :OTHER NOR D U' B D n EA 0 o mdn.rn�� WE 8 UND mmvA.u�e U-TURNS NL NT NR SL ST SR EL 1 ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL EB WB TTL LANES: 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 X X X % % X __A 19 , 179 11 11 5 1 7 15 AM 5 _ 21 4 160 51 j 151 239 �T 3 4 11 _ __ 79 743 _ 7 30 AM 9 24 120 46 1 142 241 -14 6 _ ] 9 -77 _ -_ 707 7 45 AM - 7. 13 _ 2-1 _4 19 115_ 6] 130 215 -_77 8 _ 4 19 _ - 61 694 AM 30 32 5 93 56 109 190 21 3 11 J __ - G., 000 _ _ 8 15 AM 15 23 11 69 46 ; 125 182 i 19 5 2 16 _ 95 558 8 30 AM 23 29 8 51 98 1 128 180 5 11 15 37 544 g 8:45 AM 14 _ 90 5 75_ 38 101 193 11 12 9 7 11 49 549 0 ( 0 0 < V LUME S 97 202 54 8 390 1, 1,611 132 36 56 116 494 570 0 0 0 APPROACH % 27% 57% —/2,307 15% 36% 17% 46% 91% ]% 2% 8% 17% 74% APP/DEPART 353 1,282 —/482 1,779 —/1,018 666 —/1,273 0 BE IN PEAK HR 7:00 AM VOLUMES 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 2,821 APPROACH% 24% 58% 17°/0 41% 15% 44% 91% ]% 2% 5% 14% 81% PEAK HR FAC10R 0.745 0.930 0.921 0.941 0.949 APP DEPART 143 1 257 1 34] / 291 962 640 369 / 683 0 4.00 PM_ _ 5_ 415 PM- --_ 28 1 64 15 _ 52 1 55 -385 269 24 I 4 -30 21 74 801 _ 4 30 PM _ 96 7S t 13 48 - 41 103 13 4 45 PM -_ 99 75 ..; 13 43 - Sl -147 234 1 14- 5 —11 21 8] 96- 746- 5:00 5 00 PM -- 37 90 11 49 - 54 156 230 34 _ 15 12 29 835 5:15 PM 54 70 9 37 70 --199 242 27 _ 11 17 _118 48 74_ _ -- 5 30 PM 99 I1 38 - 29 186 259 29 _14_ 1- 15 20 -83 747 5 45 PM 36 _ 98 7 32- 38 --155 213 21 _Z 11 ` 19 47 _ 629 a VOLUMES 303 522 8] 349 393 1,362 1,921 217- 51 100 181 654 6,135 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 33% 57% 10% 17% 19% 65`% 88% 10% 2% Il% 19% 70% APP/DEPART 912 / 3,097 2,109 / 544 2,184 % 698 935 / 1,896 _ 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 4:15 PM VOLUMES 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 3,195 APPROACH % 30% 60% 10% 18% 20% 62% 88% 10% 3% 9% 19% 72°7o PEAK HR FACTOR 0.928 0.896 0.932 0.833 0.957 APP DEPART 512 / 1 G56 1 046 / 286 1 10] / 357. 530 901 0 Central Avenue -- NORTH SIDE ---� Collier Avenue WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Collier Avenue 1 SOUTH SIDE - Central Avenue , BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS I 55 I ES 11 WS I TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0� 0 0 0 k,0 j. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ - 0 ,__ 0 0�--0 0 0 0 1 0 0 _ 0 -0----0--0 lo i 0 -o 0 - 0 0 010'0 1 0 0 o a o 0 0 00!0 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. fel: 951 249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com Central Avenue - NORTH SIDE 1 , Pasadena Street WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Pasadena Street —' SOUTH SIDE Central Avenue GATE' 1 LOCATION: Lake Elsinore PROJECT #: SCO476 7:00 AM Thu, Nov 6, 14 NORTH & SOUTH: Central Avenue LOCATION # 5 7:15 AM EAST & WEST: Pasadena Street CONTROL: Stop All Ways 7:30 AM NOTES: `VPAll 7:45 AM 'PH N _ 8 00 AM MD W E _. 8:15 AM CONER 5 D30 AM " :..OTTER':. 845 AM N R B 0 UTHB LED EASTBOUND -- 415 PM U-TURNS 430 PM eeno-ai A.ewe L 6 a .. 5:15 PM 30 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Wl WK TOTAL NB SB E8 i WB T TL LANES: 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 X X X X 7:00 AM 0 s 10 1 1 15 715 AM 0 0- 08 2 3 0 0 0 22 -_ 7:30 AM 0 0- 0 ] 0 _---- 9 4 0 0 _0 0 2 _2 5 2] 0 0 0 0 0 _--_ 74S AM 0 1 0 14- 3_ 15 5 0 0 -0 1 1 _ 4 43 _ _ 8:00 AM 0 2- 0 13- 1 13 6 -0 1 5 42 _-_ 815 AM_ __ 1 1-_- 0 7" 1 17_ 4 _ _10 -_ 0 0 6 0 1 32 0 0 0 0 0 ---830 AM 0 _ 2 0 6 3 2 5 0 l 0 1 0 ] 26 g 845 AM 0 1 0 3 1 5- 3 0 j 0 0 2 -6 21 VOLUMES 1 ] o 63 14 72 31 1 0 1 ] 31 230 0 1 1 2 APPROACH% 13% 88% 0% 92% 9% 48% 97% 394. 0% 3% 18% 79% APP/DEPART 8 / 69 149 —/15 33 / 65 46 / 81 0 BEGIN PEAK I1R 1:30 AM VOLUMES 1 4 0 41 5 54 19 1 0 0 4 15 144 APPROACH % 20% 80% 0% 41% 5% 54/a 95% 5% 0% 0% 21070 79% MEADEK HPAR FACTOR 0.625 0.781 0.714 0.679 0.837 APP RT 5 / 38 100 5 20 / 42 19 / 59 0 4:00 PH 10 0 0 0 PM 0_ 7-_ 0 6-" 1 3 15 2 D -0 1] 37 .__415 _ 430 PM 0 1 0 1 1 2_ 10 _ 3 1 0 1 -8 28 _ -445 PM _ _ S00 PM 1 2 0 � 1 r 0 I 0 3 3 2 0 3_ 5_ 6 17 1 2 0 0 _0 0 9 0 28 32 0 0 0 1 1 _ 515 PM _ 0 l 3 0 8- 2 3 _ _ 8 0 0 _0 0 _5 0 7 31 30 PM _ _- 0 1 0 4 0 2- -5-0-0 0 0 -6 18 0 0 0 0 0 _ 5:45 PM -0— 0 0 3 0 _ 1 - 4 1 3 - 0 - 0 4 16 _- - a VOLUMES 2 10 1 34 ] 27 73 9 5 0 3 51 226 1 0 0 3 4 APPROACH % 15% 77% 8% 50/0 10070 401/1 81% 10% 60/1 0% 6% 94% WMEXEMART 14 / 134 68 / 13 87 / 47 57 / 32 0 BEGIN PEAK I IN 4:15 PM VOLUMES 1 6 0 12 5 13 48 8 1 0 2 29 125 APPROACH% 14% 86% 0% 40% 17% 43% 84% 14/0 2% 0% 6% 94/0 PEAK HR FACTOR 0.583 0.5000.750 0.861 0.845 APP /DEPART 7 83 30 / 6 57 20 31 / I6 0 Central Avenue - NORTH SIDE 1 , Pasadena Street WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Pasadena Street —' SOUTH SIDE Central Avenue 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM S _ 8 00 AM ¢ _. 8:15 AM D30 AM " 845 AM TOTAL 4:00 PM -- 415 PM 430 PM 4:45 PM L 6 500 PM .. 5:15 PM 30 PM " 5'45 PM -- TOTAL APPENDIX D Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Delay EXPLANATION AND CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE USING DELAY METHODOLOGY The levels of service at the unsignalized and signalized intersections are calculated using the delay methodology in the Highway Capacity Manual. This methodology views an intersection as consisting of several lane groups. A lane group is a set of lanes serving a movement. If there are two northbound left turn lanes, then the lane group serving the northbound left turn movement has two lanes. Similarly, there may be three lanes in the lane group serving the northbound through movement, one lane in the lane group serving the northbound right turn movement, and so forth. It is also possible for one lane to serve two lane groups. A shared lane might result in there being 1.5 lanes in the northbound left turn lane group and 2.5 lanes in the northbound through lane group. For each lane group, there is a capacity. That capacity is calculated by multiplying the number of lanes in the lane group times a theoretical maximum lane capacity per lane times 12 adjustment factors. Each of the 12 adjustment factors has a value of approximately 1.00. A value less than 1.00 is generally assigned when a less than desirable condition occurs. The 12 adjustment factors are as follows: 1. Peak hour factor (to account for peaking within the peak hour) 2. Lane utilization factor (to account for not all lanes loading equally) 3. Lane width 4. Percent of heavy trucks 5. Approach grade 6. Parking 7. Bus stops at intersections 8. Area type (CBD or other) 9. Right turns 10. Left turns 11. Pedestrian activity 12. Signal progression The maximum theoretical lane capacity and the 12 adjustment factors for it are all unknowns for which approximate estimates have been recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. For the most part, the recommended values are not based on statistical analysis but rather on educated estimates. However, it is possible to use the delay method and get reasonable results as will be discussed below. Once the lane group volume is known and the lane group capacity is known, a volume to capacity ratio can be calculated for the lane group. With a volume to capacity ratio calculated, average delay per vehicle in a lane group can be estimated. The average delay per vehicle in a lane group is calculated using a complex formula provided by the Highway Capacity Manual, which can be simplified and described as follows: Delay per vehicle in a lane group is a function of the following: 1. Cycle length 2. Amount of red time faced by a lane group 3. Amount of yellow time for that lane group 4. The volume to capacity ratio of the lane group The average delay per vehicle for each lane group is calculated, and eventually an overall average delay for all vehicles entering the intersection is calculated. This average delay per vehicle is then used to judge Level of Service. The Level of Services are defined in the table that follows this discussion. Experience has shown that when a maximum lane capacity of 1,900 vehicles per hour is used (as recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual), little or no yellow time penalty is used, and none of the 12 penalty factors are applied, calculated delay is realistic. The delay calculation for instance assumes that yellow time is totally unused. Yet experience shows that most of the yellow time is used. An idiosyncrasy of the delay methodology is that it is possible to add traffic to an intersection and reduce the average total delay per vehicle. If the average total delay is 30 seconds per vehicle for all vehicles traveling through an intersection, and traffic is added to a movement that has an average total delay of 15 seconds per vehicle, then the overall average total delay is reduced. The delay calculation for a lane group is based on a concept that the delay is a function of the amount of unused capacity available. As the volume approaches capacity and there is no more unused capacity available, then the delay rapidly increases. Delay is not proportional to volume, but rather increases rapidly as the unused capacity approaches zero. Because delay is not linearly related to volumes, the delay does not reflect how close an intersection is to overloading. If an intersection is operating at Level of Service C and has an average total delay of 2 seconds per vehicle, you know very little as to what percent the traffic can increase before Level of Service E is reached. LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION) Level Average Total Delay of Per Vehicle (Seconds) Service Description Signalized Unsignalized A Level of Service A occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level of Service B generally nrairs with gond B progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for Level of Service A, causing 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 higher levels of average total delay. Level of Service C generally results when there is fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual C cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level of Service D generally results in noticeable congestion. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle D lengths, or high volume to capacity ratios. Many 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of Service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally E indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 high volume to capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Level of Service F is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed F the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high volume to capacity ratios below 1.00 with many g0.01 and up 50.01 and up individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Source: Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. Existing MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:32:24 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Morning Peak Hour _______ ______________________ _ _________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.417 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.6 Optimal. Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- ___________________________-__-______________ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 7. 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2. 0 1 __________________________________________I______________________________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 762 14 39 586 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 762 14 39 586 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 762 14 39 586 20 ____________ ___ ________________--------------- _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 870 870 1615 1457 1900 1615 1805 3536 63 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.16 0.01 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.24 0.47 0.47 0.12 0.34 0.34 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.46 0.01 0.18 0.12 0.46 0.46 0.18 0.48 0.04 Delay/Veh: 21.8 21.8 22.0 24.9 21.8 22.7 17.8 11.0 11.0 24.3 15.9 13.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 21.8 21.8 22.0 24.9 21.8 22.7 17.8 11.0 11.0 24.3 15.9 13.3 LOS by Move: C C C C C C B B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 5 5 1 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:32:39 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Evening Peak Hour __________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Bunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.606 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _-_____-----___) Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 1.1 41 857 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1..00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 19 4 49 264 2 112 105 981 12 44 916 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 4 49 264 2 112 105 981 12 44 916 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 4 49 264 2 112 105 981 1.2 44 916 25 ------------ I--------------- --------------- ')--------------- ---__ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1337 297 1615 1423 1900 1615 1805 3560 43 1805 3610 1615 _________ _______________ --------------- --------------- ---------- .----� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.25 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.17 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.67 0.00 0.25 0.35 0.67 0.67 0.21 0.71 0.04 Delay/Veh: 16.1 16.1 16.4 24.0 15.8 17.3 22.9 15.7 15.7 24.5 18.3 12.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 16.1 16.1 16.4 24.0 15.8 17.3 22.9 1.5.7 15.7 24.5 18.3 12.5 LOS by Move: B B R C B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 6 0 2 2 9 9 1 9 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (e) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIGB - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:35:07 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Morning Peak Hour ------------------------- _ -----__--- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.797 Loss Time (see): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------- --- -------------------- ----.. ... ...___--------------- -----------__--� Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------------ --------------- --------------- -_-------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ise: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 74 1107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 7.107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 1107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ______------__'� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 1.58 Final Sat.: 1.805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2045 0 2269 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.87 Delay/Veh: 25.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 19.1 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 31.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 25.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 19.1 18.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 31.0 LOS by Move: C A A A B B A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 2 4 0 0 16 11 0 0 0 6 0 9 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIC8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:35:57 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Evening Peak Hour ---------------------------------------------------- .------------- ..--------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 BCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.721 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- -----------------------------_ Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 143 1706 0 0 1366 351 0 0 0 476 0 629 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 143 1706 0 0 1366 351 0 0 0 476 0 629 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 143 1706 0 0 1366 351 0 0 0 476 0 629 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------'-- ------------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.00 1.57 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2033 0 2229 --------_--- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.28 Crit Moves: **** **#t **+t Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.72 Delay/Veh: 50.8 19.3 0.0 0.0 26.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 25.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 50.8 19.3 0.0 0.0 26.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 25.0 LOS by Move: D B A A C C A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 0 0 13 9 0 0 0 8 0 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:20 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Morning Peak Hour _---______-.-_____________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.869 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R __________________________--------------- --------------- 11____--__----_-_� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- _-----__-______� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 888 516 894 1431 0 273 0 206 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 868 516 894 1431 0 273 0 206 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 888 516 894 1431 0 273 0 206 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ._____.... ..--_---_ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.57 0.00 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2259 0 2057 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- ______________________________ _____________-_ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.32 0.26 0.40 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ++++ ++++ ++++ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.30 0.67 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0,00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.67 0.86 0.86 0.60 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/veh: 0.0 17,1, 30.0 27.7 6.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 17.1 30.0 27.7 6.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C C A A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 12 12 8 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:41 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------- 11 Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.976 Loss Time (see): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sea/veh): 42.0 Optimal. Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- '--------------- -------___-_--- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1210 502 876 983 0 654 0 154 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1210 502 876 983 0 654 0 154 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1210 502 876 983 0 654 0 154 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- _--------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.81 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2510 0 1651 0 0 0 -----_------ I --------------- --- ----------- --... ------------ II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.34 0.31 0.25 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ++i* +*+* *•++ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.26 0.60 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.97 0.45 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 48.2 45.7 56.3 9.9 0.0 60.5 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 48.2 45.7 56.3 9.9 0.0 60.5 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A D D E A A E A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 24 17 18 8 0 15 0 3 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:20 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial. Park Existing Morning Peak Hour __ ------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.634 Loss Time (sea): 16 (Y+R=4.0 Sea) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- --------------- II -------------- ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1. 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ I--------------- ----------------_-------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 37 87 26 577 213 629 923 71 20 21 54 314 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 37 87 26 577 213 629 923 71 20 21 54 314 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 37 87 26 577 213 629 923 77, 20 21 54 314 --------------------------- --------------- -------------- ----_----------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.54 0.46 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2677 806 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------ I --------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.1.6 0.11 0.22 0.26 0.02. 0.01 0,01 0.03 0.19 Crit Moves: **** *+#i ##t+ **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.22 0.17 0.52 0.35 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.75 0.66 0.43 0.75 0,09 0.05 0.05 0.28 0.61 Delay/Veh: 25.6 29.9 29.9 29.6 32.3 10.5 2.2.6 21.4 7.1.3 21.3 30.0 22.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 25.6 29.9 29.9 29.6 32.3 10.5 22.6 21.4 21.3 21.3 30.0 22.2 LOS by Move: C C C C C B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 2 2 8 6 5 11 1 0 0 1 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:41 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Evening Peak Hour . -- - --_----------' Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.852 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- --------------- --------------- -_------.-_-----� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ --------------- ------------ ------------------ .__-- Volume Module: Base Vol: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 162 319 54 201 216 676 1013 113 31 51. 103 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 162 319 54 201 216 676 1013 113 31 51 103 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 162 319 54 201 216 676 1013 113 31 51 103 399 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _ Sa.turation FLOW Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.71 0.29 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3016 514 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.24 0.29 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.25 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.47 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.40 0.83 0.83 0.53 0.94 0.51 0.83 0.12 0.07 0.17. 0.32 0.89 Delay/Veh: 27.4 39.6 39.6 28.9 71.4 12.3 24.1 18.5 18.3 18.5 24.3 42.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 27.4 39.6 39.6 28.9 71.4 12.3 24.1 18.5 18.3 18.5 24.3 42.6 LOS by Move: C D D C E B C B B B C D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 8 6 12 1 1 1 2 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:20 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Morning Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./Cap.(X): 0.071 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- ------------------------------ ---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ---__------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Volume: 1 5 1 49 6 65 23 1 1 1 5 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 5 1 49 6 65 23 1 1 1 5 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 5 1 49 6 65 23 1 1 1 5 18 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.67 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.05 0.05 1.00 0.21 0.79 Final Sat.: 127 509 127 698 772 908 644 34 34 665 174 651 ---_-------- I------------------------------------------------------------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.07. 0.07 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves: Delay/Veh: 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.2 7.4 6.9 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.0 7.1 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.7 7,7 7.7 8.2 7.4 6.9 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.0 7.1 7.1 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.7 7.5 8.1 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.7 7.5 8.1 7.1 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:29:41 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Evening Peak Hour __--------------------------------------------..________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.091 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.7 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- I--------------- --------------- ----________--- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- ---------- ..---- -_-----_------_ Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHP Volume: 1 7 1 14 6 15 57 9 1 1 2 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 7 1 14 6 15 57 9 1 1 2 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 7 1 14 6 15 57 9 1 1 2 34 ------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------------------ Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.12 0.76 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.14 0.02 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final. Sat.: 93 559 93 674 744 869 626 104 13 692 57 833 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- -_-_____-------� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: +#++ **x* xxxx +++* Delay/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.1 7.5 6.8 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.9 6.9 6.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.1 7.5 6.8 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.9 6.9 6.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel.: 7.8 7.4 8.3 6.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.8 7.4 8.3 6.9 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxxxx#xxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxx***xx*%**+++*%****+***xx###rt++##+t#txxxxxxx++++%x*xxxx Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Existing Plus Project Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:54:39 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Bunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.521 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Control: ___ --Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1, 0 1 0 2 0 1 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Added Vol: 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 15 124 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 1 32 96 2 41 52 731 28 161 562 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PBF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PUT Volume: 3 1 33 100 2 43 54 762 29 168 586 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 1 33 100 2 43 54 762 29 168 586 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 1 33 100 2 43 54 762 29 168 586 20 ------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.75 0.25 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final. Sat.: 1220 407 1615 1455 1900 1615 3.805 3456 132 1805 3610 1615 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.16 0.01 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.25 0.42 0.42 0.18 0.35 0.35 Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.52 0.01. 0.20 0.12 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.46 0.04 Delay/Veh: 22.7 22.7 23.4 26.8 22.6 23.7 17.4 1.3.1 13.1 23.9 15.4 12.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.7 22.7 23.4 26.8 22.6 23.7 17.4 13.1 13.1 23.9 15.4 12.9 LOS by Move: C C C C C C B B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 6 6 4 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:55:53 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour ________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.626 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.3 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I_______________ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- ____II--------------- II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 Added Vol: 15 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 33 4 173 247 2 105 98 918 13 60 857 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 35 4 185 264 2 112 105 981 14 64 916 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Reduced Vol: 35 4 185 264 2 112 105 981 14 64 916 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 35 4 185 264 2 112 105 981 14 64 916 25 ------------ I--------------- 11_______________II_____________._II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.74 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes; 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1384 168 1615 1397 1900 1615 1805 3552 50 1805 3610 1615 --------------- 11--------------- II_ I_______ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.11 0.19 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.25 0.02 Crit Moves: **++ .+}* ++#+ Green/Cycle: 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.16 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.09 0.41 0.68 0.00 0.25 0.35 0.68 0.68 0.30 0.71 0.04 Delay/Veh: 16.2 16.2 18.3 24.2 15.7 17.1 23.0 16.0 16.0 25.1 18.4 12.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Adj Del/Veh: 16.2 16.2 18.3 24.2 15.7 17.1 23.0 16.0 16.0 25.1 18.4 12.6 LOS by Move: B B B C B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 3 6 0 2 2 9 9 1 9 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:54:39 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Hunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 8.51 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------__ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- -- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Finalvolume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- -_-_-----------� Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I ---------- ---- --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 14 14 11 21 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1010 884 1076 1608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1009 884 1076 1608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXxx XXXXX Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx XXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1025 xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX Shared LOS: * * * • A * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf f ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:55:53 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------- ..----------------------------------------------- Level _________--____-__ ___Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM UnsignaliZed Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Intersection 42 Hunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- _____ -_________-____..____-------_____I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ ---- ...---------- '--------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 20 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 21 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 21 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 ------------ _______________--------------- --------------- 11 --------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxx, 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ___________________________--------------- --------------- _____ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 6 3 4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxx 1021 894 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx ,xxxx 1020 893 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ___________________________ --------------- --------------- ____--_-_______� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx ,xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ,xxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ,xxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * + * + + + A + w + + + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1023 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 ,xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * + + A + A + + + + + ApproachDel: XX,xXX 8.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: + A + + Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:59:33 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Morning Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 43 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.782 LOSS Time (Sea): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 1 ---------------11--------------- 1_____________-_I Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 74 1107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 1107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 1107 0 0 2019 550 0 0 0 344 0 471 ------------ ------------------------------ ---------------11___--_-__-__---� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 1.58 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2043 0 2266 -------- --- I --------------- -- ------_____ -------------- --------------.� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.21 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.84 Delay/Veh: 28.2 7.8 0.0 0.0 18.4 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 0.0 30.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 28.2 7.8 0.0 0.0 18.4 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 0.0 30.1 LOS by Move: C A A A B B A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 2 5 0 0 16 11 0 0 0 6 0 9 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:00:07 Page 1-1 ______________________________________________________________________..-________ Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------------.__________P__________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 43 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol,/Cap.(X): 0.749 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 137 1.633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Added Vol: 56 24 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 193 1657 0 0 1311 336 0 0 0 463 0 602 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 202 1731 0 0 1370 351 0 0 0 484 0 629 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 202 1731 0 0 1370 351 0 0 0 484 0 629 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 202 1731 0 0 1370 351 0 0 0 484 0 629 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.00 1.57 Final Sat.: 1.805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2035 0 2221 _________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.2.8 Crit Moves: x*** #*** x{## Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.75 Delay/Veh: 51.7 1.9.2 0.0 0.0 30.2 28.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 29.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 51.7 19.2 0,0 0.0 30.2 28.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 29.2 LOS by Move: D B A A C C A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 8 15 0 0 15 10 0 0 0 9 0 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:54:39 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ----------------------------------------------------------------._..------__------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.865 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II --------------- ---------------II -----I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------._ ---- --------------- --------------- --------------- -----------_---� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 12 7 0 69 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 816 474 809 1364 0 247 0 241 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 902 524 894 1507 0 273 0 266 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 902 524 894 1507 0 273 0 266 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 902 524 894 1507 0 273 0 266 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- _-----------_--� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2168 0 2150 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- ---------_----II------------------------------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.32 0.26 0.42 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: +#*. **w* +*** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.67 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.66 0.86 0.86 0.62 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.1 30.7 29.1 6.5 0.0 41.6 0.0 39.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.1 30.7 29.1 6.5 0.0 41.6 0.0 39.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C C A A D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 9 13 3.2 10 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:55:53 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour ---------------------------------------------------------------- - --._---__------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.990 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 47,1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _--------_-- I ----- -------- II --------------- II ------------- II Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 80 47 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1228 523 831 944 0 621 0 155 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1294 551 876 995 0 654 0 163 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1294 551 876 995 0 654 0 163 0 0 0 PCF. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Volume: 0 1294 551 876 995 0 654 0 163 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II -----I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2495 0 1663 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- -------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.34 0.25 0.28 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: t*#+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.25 0.62 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.45 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 53.0 53.8 63.8 10.3 0.0 67.7 0.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 53.0 53,8 63.8 10.3 0.0 67.7 0.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A D D E B A E A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 27 21 20 8 0 17 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:54:39 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 14CM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.649 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ___------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- --------------- ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Added Vol: 0 1 1 0 10 114 17 1 0 5 10 0 PasserByVol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 84 26 548 212 711 893 68 19 25 61 298 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 37 89 27 577 223 749 941 72 20 26 64 314 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 37 89 27 577 223 749 941 72 20 26 64 314 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 37 89 27 577 223 749 941 72 20 26 64 314 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -_-------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.53 0.47 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2660 823 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------ I--------------- -------------- ---------------II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.16 0.12 0.26 0.27 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.19 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.22 0.17 0.53 0.35 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.76 0.69 0.50 0.76 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.34 0.61 Delay/Veh: 25.9 29.9 29.9 30.1 33.2 11.0 22.7 21.4 21.2 21.3 30.4 22.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 25.9 29.9 29.9 30.1 33.2 11.0 22.7 21.4 21.2 21.3 30.4 22.4 LOS by Move: C C C C C B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 2 2 8 6 6 11 1 0 0 2 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:55:53 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour _____________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.883 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: I. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ _____________ 1_ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1. 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Added Vol: 0 10 5 0 1 18 117 10 0 1 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 155 315 57 192 208 665 1086 118 30 50 100 382 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 162 329 60 201 217 695 1135 123 31 52 104 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 162 329 60 201 217 695 1135 123 31 52 104 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 162 329 60 201 217 695 1135 123 31 52 104 399 ____________ _______________�_______________--------------- _____-_________� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.69 0.31 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2987 540 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ____________ _______________---------------- --------------- _______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.24 0.32 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.25 Crit Moves: *+** ++*# #### ###* Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.50 0.37 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.17 0.27 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.87 0.87 0.57 0.94 0.49 0.87 0.13 0.07 0.11 0.32 0.92 Delay/Veh: 30.2 46.0 46.0 32.4 74.1 12.1 26.6 19.3 19.0 19.2 26.1 48.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 30.2 46.0 46.0 32.4 74.1 12.1 26.6 19.3 19.0 19.2 26.1 48.6 ILS by Move: C D D C E B C B e B C D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 7 7 3 9 6 15 1 1 1 2 13 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA I Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:54:39 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Project Morning Peak Hour -----------------------------------------------------------------------------.--- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) ***##############+t++i+#t+#i*+*+*+**+***+**+***aaa#i+#t####***++++####*+++#+t•** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.091 Loss Time (see): 0 (Y+R_4.0 sec) Average Delay (Sea/veh): 7.6 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- __-------------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ____-----------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 1 0 0 5 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 4 1 41 5 69 21 2 1 1 9 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Volume: 1 5 1 49 6 82 25 2 1 1 11 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 S 1 49 6 82 25 2 1 1 11 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 5 1 49 6 82 25 2 1 1 11 18 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- - Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.67 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.08 0.04 1.00 0.37 0.63 Final Sat.: 126 502 126 693 768 901 615 59 29 658 298 497 ------------ I --------------- ------------------------------ II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: +**+ **** *+*# #*** Delay/Veh: 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.2 7.4 7.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.0 7.3 7.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.2 7.4 7.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.0 7.3 7.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.7 7.5 8.2 7.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.7 7.5 8.2 7.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA I Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 20:55:53 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial. Park Existing Plus Project Evening Peak Hour ____..___________________________________..____________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.123 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _________________ __.----------- 11---------------11-______________� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------_ --------------- _______________-_-____________� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 5 0 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 6 1 12 5 15 63 13 1 1 3 29 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 1 7 1 14 6 18 75 15 1 1 4 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 7 1 14 6 18 75 15 1 1 4 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 7 1 14 6 18 75 15 1 1 4 34 ____________ ______________________________ --------------- _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.12 0.76 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.17 0.01 1.00 0.09 0.91 Final Sat.: 91 549 91 664 731 851 608 125 10 689 82 797 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: Delay/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 7.5 6.9 8.5 8.5 8.5 7.9 6.9 6.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 7.5 6.9 8.5 8.5 8.5 7.9 6.9 6.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.9 7.5 8.5 7.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.9 7.5 8.5 7.0 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9,0215 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:05:23 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 ROM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 41 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical. Vol./Cap.(X): 0.538 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.3 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 761 14 38 585 20 Added Vol: 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 15 124 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 1 33 100 2 43 54 761 29 162 585 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHP Volume: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 793 30 169 610 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 793 30 169 610 21 PCF. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 793 30 169 610 21 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1212 415 1615 1455 1900 161.5 1805 3462 130 1805 3610 1615 ..__________________________________ _______� _____________. �_ _______________� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.2.3 0.23 0.09 0.17 0.01 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.25 0.43 0.43 0.17 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.54 0.01 0.21 0.13 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.04 Delay/Veh: 22.6 22.6 23.4 27.3 22.6 23.7 17.8 13.2 13.2 24.4 15.3 12.7 User Del.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 22.6 22.6 23.4 27.3 22.6 23.7 17.8 13.2 13.2 24.4 15.3 12.7 LOS by Move: C C C C C C B B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 7 7 4 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC. ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:06:02 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour _______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume. Alternative) Intersection 41 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.650 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ _______________1 --------------- 1 --------------- 1_______________� Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 11 41 857 23 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 19 4 48 257 2 109 102 955 11 43 892 24 Added Vol: 15 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 34 4 175 257 2 109 102 955 13 62 892 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1020 14 66 953 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1020 14 66 953 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1020 14 66 953 26 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.74 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 Fina]. Sat.: 1380 170 1615 1397 1900 1615 1805 3553 50 1805 3610 1615 _______________________________________________�I...._.._..________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.26 0.02 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.28 0.28 0,28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0,16 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.09 0.42 0,71 0.00 0.26 0.38 0.71 0.71 0.31 0.73 0.04 Delay/Veh: 16.2 16.2 18.3 25.4 15.7 17.2 23.3 16.5 16.5 25.1 18.7 12.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 16.2 16.2 18.3 25.4 15.7 17.2 23.3 16.5 16.5 25.1 18.7 12.4 LOS by Move: B B B C B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 3 6 0 2 2 10 10 1 10 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat NOV 15, 2014 21:05:23 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------ _-------------------------------------------- Level ________________________ __Level Of. Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 42 Hunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 8.51 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I____________ --------------- --------------- Control; StopSign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- I--------------- --------------- I ----_______--_- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 ------------ --------------- ------------------------------ 11__ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx --------------------------- ---------------------------------------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 14 14 11 21 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1010 884 1076 1608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1009 B83 1076 1608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx __ __ I ______________________________ --------------- _____ Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * + * i } A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1025 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * # * A } p ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: t A } , Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:06:02 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour -------------------..----------------------____---------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Hunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.61 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -_-----------_-� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 20 0 1. 1 1 0 0 1 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 21 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 21. 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 --------------------------- ---- ..----- _---- --------------- ---------------� Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I -------------- II ----------------- II ---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 6 3 4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1021 893 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.020 893 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * + * r * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1023 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * A * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A * + Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:05:23 Page 4-1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ________________P______________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection y3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.820 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.3 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B IIIAAAA****ww****+**++i*+*******+*+#+*#++*****+***##**i***************ti*a****** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 69 1027 0 0 1874 511 0 0 0 319 0 437 Added Vol: 8 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 1030 0 0 1898 511 0 0 0 365 0 437 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 86 1155 0 0 2128 573 0 0 0 410 0 490 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 86 1155 0 0 2128 573 0 0 0 410 0 490 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 86 1155 0 0 2128 573 0 0 0 410 0 490 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 0.00 1.54 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2079 0 2206 ________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.22 Crit Moves: **** *+++ *+t+ Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.87 Delay/Veh: 31.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 20.1 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 32.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 31.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 20.1 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: C A A A C B A A A C A C IICM2kAvgQ: 2 5 0 0 18 12 0 0 0 8 0 10 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:15:26 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour __ _ ------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.769 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 Seo) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------- -------------------- II --------------- II ---------------i Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 143 1699 0 0 1360 350 0 0 0 474 0 626 Added Vol: 56 24 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 199 1723 0 0 1364 350 0 0 0 481 0 626 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 207 1800 0 0 1425 365 0 0 0 503 0 654 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 207 1800 0 0 1425 365 0 0 0 503 0 654 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 207 1800 0 0 1425 365 0 0 0 503 0 654 ------------ --------------- .--------------- --------------- ------------- .._.I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 O.BS 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.00 1.57 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2033 0 2216 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- _--------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.30 Crit Moves: ++*+ +*}} *+*+ Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.77 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0,00 0.77 Delay/Veh: 57.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 33.2 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 32.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 57,4 21.2 0.0 0.0 33.2 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 32..2 LOS by Move: E C A A C C A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 9 17 0 0 17 11 0 0 0 10 0 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 1.5, 2014 21:05:23 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++a++aaaaaa+aaa++++++++++++++++++++++++++a+++++++ Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) aaa+++aaa+aaaaaaaaa+aa+++a++++++++++a++++++a+aa+++<++a++aaaaaa++++++++a+aaa+a+++ Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.886 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C a+++++aaaa+++++++++a+aaaa++aaaa+++++++++++++aaaaa++++++aaa+++++aaaa+++++++++aaaa Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ --------------- 11--------------- ___ _-_� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 _________________________________________________________I_______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1..04 1.04 1.04 initial Bse: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 12 7 0 69 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 848 493 842 1416 0 257 0 249 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 ____________ _______________ --------------- 1 _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2,00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2166 0 2141 0 0 0 _-------------------------________________ ____ ______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.34 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ++a+ a++a aaa+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.68 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 volume/Cap: 0.00 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.64 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.5 34.3 32.3 6.8 0.0 45.3 0.0 42.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 19.5 34.3 32.3 6.8 0.0 45.3 0.0 42.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C C A A D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 15 14 11 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 a+++aaa++aa++++aaaaa+aa+aaa++aaaa+aaaaa++aaa+++a+aa++++aa+++a+a++a+a++aaa+++++aa Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. aa++++a+++aa+++aaaaaaaaaaaaa+a++++++++a++++++aaa+++++aaaa+a++++a++++++aaaa++++++ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:16:05 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 110 Critical vol./Cap.(X): 1.016 LOSS Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 54.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R --- .-------- I---------------II---------------II---------------II Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 -------..---- I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial 13se: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 80 47 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 PasserSyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial. Fut: 0 1274 542 865 982 0 646 0 161 0 0 0 User Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 3.343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 __------------- --------------- ------------ _____----------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2492 0 1660 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.35 0.26 0.29 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** r+#+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.26 0.62 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.96 1.01 0.46 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Del.ay/Veh: 0.0 62.5 61.8 74.0 11.0 0.0 78.3 0.0 33.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 62.5 61.8 74.0 11.0 0.0 78.3 0.0 33.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A E E E B A E A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 32 24 22 10 0 19 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:13:29 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project - With Improvements Morning Peak Hour --------------------------------------------- ._----___ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.886 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -I ------ II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial ese: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 12 7 0 69 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 848 493 842 1416 0 257 0 249 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P11F Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 938 545 930 1565 0 284 0 275 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1615 3502 3610 0 2168 0 2144 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -----_____-----� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.18 0.34 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.7.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: i#*. +}*+ +}++ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.69 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.47 0.88 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.4 33.7 31.8 6.6 0.0 48.6 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 16.4 33.7 31.8 6.6 0.0 48.6 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C C A A D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 15 14 11 0 8 0 7 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:12:01 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project - With Improvements Evening Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.996 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 45.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __----- ---- ---------------1 --------------- --------------- 11____-_---------� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- -._.._....---------- -___----------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bee: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 80 47 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1274 542 865 982 0 646 0 161 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1343 571 911 1034 0 681 0 170 0 0 0 --------------------------- ---------------H --------------- 11 --------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1615 3502 3610 0 2489 0 1658 0 0 0 ___I____ ---------- ------------------------------ --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.35 0.26 0.29 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **+. **+* **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.26 0.62 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.73 0.99 0.99 0.46 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 32.2 70.5 68.1 11.3 0.0 72.6 O.O 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 32.2 70.5 68.1 11.3 0.0 72.6 0.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C E E B A E A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 15 26 22 10 0 19 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario sat NOV 15, 2014 21:05:23 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour ________________________________ ____ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.662 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 1_ ______1 --------------- -___ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include OV1 Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------I --------------- --------------- --------------- ______-________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 83 25 54B 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 36 86 26 570 210 621 911 70 20 21 53 310 Added Vol: 0 1 1 0 10 114 17 1 0 5 10 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 36 87 27 570 220 735 928 71 20 26 63 310 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 38 92 28 601 232 775 978 75 21 27 66 327 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 38 92 28 601 232 775 978 75 21 27 66 327 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 38 92 28 601 232 775 978 75 21 27 66 327 ------------ --------------- --------------- ____-________-____-__________- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0,95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.53 0.47 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2661 823 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------ --------------- _ ____ --------------- ______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.17 0.12 0.27 0.28 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.20 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.23 0.18 0.55 0.37 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.75 0.67 0.49 0.75 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.37 0.63 Delay/Veh: 28.2 32.6 32.6 31.0 33.6 10.5 23.0 22.6 22.4 22.5 33.3 24.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 28.2 32.6 32.6 31.0 33.6 10.5 23.0 22.6 22.4 22.5 33.3 24.1 LOS by Move: C C C C C B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 2 2 9 6 7 12 1 0 1 2 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:06:02 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #k5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.890 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4,0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R 1. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------------------------------------ II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include OV1 Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------- I--------------- --------------- ------_________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 161 317 54 200 215 673 1008 112 31 51 103 397 Added Vol: 0 10 5 0 1 18 117 10 0 1 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 161 327 59 200 216 691 1125 122 31 52 104 397 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 169 342 62 209 226 722 1176 128 33 54 109 415 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 169 342 62 209 226 722 1176 128 33 54 109 415 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 169 342 62 7.09 226 722 1176 128 33 54 109 415 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.69 0.31 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2988 539 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 I___ -- --- ----------- _______________ _--__-_--_-----� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.34 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **++ ***+ **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.51 0.38 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.89 0.50 0.89 0.13 0.07 0.11 0.31 0.90 Delay/Veh: 33.8 56.3 56.3 34.7 62.0 12.4 30.0 20.2 19.9 20.1 27.0 46.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 33.8 56.3 56.3 34.7 62.0 12.4 30.0 20.2 19.9 20.1 27.0 46.2 LOS by Move: C E E C E B C C B C C D HCM2kAvgQ: 3 8 8 3 9 7 17 1 1 1 2 13 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. r*****+rrr*r++r*+r+++++++++++r++++++*rr+++++*+++****+****+***+*+**+*******+***** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:05:23 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Morning Peak Hour _______________ _---_______------___________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 ROM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.094 LOSS Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11--_------------11_______________� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ___________________________--------------- __ _------_-______� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 4 1 43 5 56 20 1 1 1 4 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 1 0 0 5 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 4 1 43 5 71 22 2 1 1 9 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Volume: 1 5 1 51 6 85 26 2 1 1 11 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 5 1 51 6 85 26 2 1 1 11 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ELF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 5 1 51 6 85 26 2 1 1 11 19 ____________ ______________________________ --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.17 0.66 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.08 0.04 1.00 0.37 0.63 Final Sat.: 125 501 125 693 765 900 615 58 29 656 293 500 ___________________________--------------- --------------- __--__ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: Delay/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.3 7.4 7.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 Z 3 7.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.3 7.4 7.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 7.3 7.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sat Nov 15, 2014 21:06:02. Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Evening Peak Hour _..._---_--- - ---------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue. (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.126 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________--------------- 11 --------------- 1 ---------------11_____-_--______ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ___.________________________ --------------- --------------- --_-_---------_ Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Ise: 1 6 1 12 5 14 50 8 1 1 2 30 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 5 0 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 6 1 12 5 16 65 13 1 1 3 30 User Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 1 7 1 15 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 7 1 15 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 36 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 7 1 15 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 36 ------------ --------------- --------------- I...-------------- ____________--_ Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.12 0.76 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.17 0.01 1.00 0.09 0.91 Final Sat.: 91 547 91 661 728 849 608 125 10 688 81 796 ------------ ------- _------- _______________ --------------- _______________� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: Delay/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 7.6 6.9 8.5 8.5 8.5 7.9 6.9 6.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 7.6 6.9 8.5 8.5 8.5 7.9 6.9 6.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.9 7.5 8.5 7.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.9 7.5 8.5 7.0 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:42:43 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour --------------------------------..__.__-_-____________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection N1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.457 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ _______________1 _-_- ---------- --------------- ---____________ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 _..---------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ----- ..__---___- Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 761 14 38 585 20 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 45 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 821 14 38 630 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 1 1 15 104 2 44 56 856 14 40 657 21 Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 1 15 104 2 44 56 856 14 40 657 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 1 15 104 2 44 56 856 14 40 657 21 ------------ --- _----------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 865 865 1615 1457 1900 1615 1805 3544 58 1805 3610 1615 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- ______________-� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.18 0.01 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.12 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.51 0.01 0.20 0.13 0.51 0.51 0.19 0.50 0.04 Delay/Veh: 22.2 22.2 22.5 25.9 22.2 23.2 18.4 11.1 11.1 24.4 15.3 12.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 22.2 22.2 22.5 25.9 22.2 23.2 18.4 11.1 11.1 24.4 15.3 12.4 LOS by Move: C C C C C C B B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 6 6 1 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:43:03 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++wwr++a+++++r+++++++raw+awwr+a+rr+w+r++rr+rraww+++++wr+r+++aaaw+++++++wawwww+++ Intersection #1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) wwraawa a*++arr++w+r+r+rw+aarww+w aaaaaaaarww+++aawww++++rwwwraaaraa+www++aaaaaw+r Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.654 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level of Service; B aawwwawww+awa+wr++r++ww++ww+++wawaaww+aww++++ww++aawwr++++++wwwwww++r++++wwww+++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 4 46 247 2 105 98 918 it 41 857 23 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 19 4 48 257 2 109 102 955 11 43 892 24 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 76 0 PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 4 48 257 2 109 102 1017 11 43 968 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 20 4 51 275 2 117 109 1087 12 46 1034 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 20 4 51 275 2 117 109 1087 12 46 1034 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 20 4 51 275 2 117 109 1087 12 46 1034 26 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1329 295 1615 1423 1900 1615 1805 3563 40 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.19 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.29 0.02 Crit Moves: awwa ww*+ +++* Green/Cycle: 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.15 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.73 0.00 0.27 0.39 0.73 0.73 0.22 0.75 0.04 Delay/Veh: 16.5 16.5 16.9 27.1 16.2 17.8 23.7 16.4 16.4 24.5 18.5 11.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh; 16.5 16.5 16.9 27.1 16.2 17.8 23.7 16.4 16.4 24.5 18.5 11.7 LOS by Move: B B B C B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 6 0 2 2. 11 11 1 11 0 ******arw+ww++w++aw++ww++ar+a++++wra+w+a+w+++aa+r+++++++++a++wwr+++++++www++aa++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. +r+++rww++a+awwrawwaawaawww+awwawa++rw++rrw+++rr+++waw++++rrrrr+++aawrwr+++++aww Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:42:43 Page 4-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient. Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.809 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 19.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- ------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 69 1027 0 0 1874 511 0 0 0 319 0 437 Added Vol: 6 86 0 0 35 58 0 0 0 31 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1113 0 0 1909 569 0 0 0 350 0 438 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 84 1248 0 0 2140 638 0 0 0 393 0 491 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 1248 0 0 2140 638 0 0 0 393 0 491 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 1248 0 0 2140 638 0 0 0 393 0 491 ------------ --------------- -____-----__- - -------------- __ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.56 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2064 0 2222 ------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.22 Crit Moves: **** ***} +t+t Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.85 Delay/Veh: 34.6 8.8 0.0 0.0 19.7 22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 33.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 34.6 8.8 0.0 0.0 19.7 22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 33.0 LOS by Move: C A A A B C A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 3 6 0 0 19 15 0 0 0 7 0 10 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:46:31 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 115 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.760 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I- ---------------------------- --------------- ------ Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 --- I--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 143 1699 0 0 1360 350 0 0 0 474 0 626 Added Vol: 30 158 0 0 31 73 0 0 0 33 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 173 1857 0 0 1391 423 0 0 0 507 0 633 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 180 1940 0 0 1453 442 0 0 0 530 0 662 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 1940 0 0 1453 442 0 0 0 530 0 662 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 180 1940 0 0 1453 442 0 0 0 530 0 662 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ___ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.56 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2044 0 2200 --_----_---- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.30 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.76 0,75 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.76 Delay/Veh: 61.4 24.1 0.0 0.0 33.6 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 0.0 32.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 61.4 24.1 0.0 0.0 33.6 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 0.0 32.4 LOS by Move: E C A A C D A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 8 21 0 0 18 15 0 0 0 11 0 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIGB - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:45:41 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 44 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.919 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y4R=4.0 see) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ ------------ -- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 28 24 1 65 0 65 0 29 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 864 510 843 1412 0 322 0 2.23 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 955 563 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 955 563 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 955 563 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 ------------------------------- --------------- --__--_--------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.59 0.00 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2263 0 2003 0 0 0 ----__------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.35 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.67 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.69 0.92 0.92 0.64 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.1 40.5 38.2 7.7 0.0 51.3 0.0 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 21.1 40.5 38.2 7.7 0.0 51.3 0.0 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C D D A A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 17 15 12 0 9 0 6 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported i.s the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun NOV 16, 2014 13:43:03 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 44 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 115 Critical Vol./Cap.(x): 1.060 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 65.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 73 35 3 60 0 115 0 8 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1267 530 868 1031 0 761 0 160 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1335 559 914 1086 0 802 0 168 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1335 559 914 1086 0 802 0 168 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1335 559 914 1086 0 802 0 168 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.83 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2518 0 1618 0 0 0 ____________ ______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.35 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.25 0.60 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.06 0.99 1.06 0.50 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 78.8 71.6 89.6 13.5 0.0 90.4 0.0 31.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 78.8 71.6 89.6 13.5 0.0 90.4 0.0 31.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A E E F B A F A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 34 26 24 12 0 23 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:54:48 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative - With Improvements Morning Peak Hour -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.702 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------------------------------------ II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 7..04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 28 24 1 65 0 65 0 29 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 864 510 843 1412 0 322 0 223 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 955 0 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 955 0 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 955 0 931 1561 0 356 0 246 0 0 0 --------------------------- -------------- II --------- ----- ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.59 0.00 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 3502 3610 0 2243 0 1985 0 0 0 ------_----- I --------------- ------------------------------ ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ***x ***+ **+* Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.38 0.65 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.67 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 31.5 0.0 25.1 10.7 0.0 35.4 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 31.5 0.0 25.1 10.7 0.0 35.4 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C A C B A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0 12 15 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIGB - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:48:07 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative - With Improvements Evening Peak Hour ----------------------------------...-_----------_-____----------.__._-------------_ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.965 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 40.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: U #*t+#w+w*****+*t**+a****++++w**++****++}t*++#+++*#*aaaaa******#***+*+**#*###*+++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --..--------- I---- II --------------- II --------------- ---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 --- I --------------- -_-----__ - _ ----- ------ ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 631 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 73 35 3 60 0 115 0 8 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1267 530 868 1031 0 761 0 160 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1335 0 914 1086 0 802 0 168 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1.335 0 914 1086 0 B02 0 168 0 0 0 PCG Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina].Volume: 0 1335 0 914 1086 0 802 0 168 0 0 0 ------------ ------------------------------ II --------------- ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.83 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 3502 3610 0 2521 0 1620 0 0 0 --_--------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: *+** +*#+ #*** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.54 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.96 0.00 0.96 0.56 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 48.1 0.0 52.5 14.0 0.0 52.1 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 48.1 0.0 52.5 14.0 0.0 52.1 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A D A D B A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 19 0 18 11 0 18 0 3 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:42:43 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------- ""-_-__----------------- Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.684 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ----- .------ I--------------- --------------- II--------------- II Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Rse: 36 86 26 570 210 621 911 70 20 21 53 310 Added Vol: 1 5 0 35 23 35 40 14 6 0 9 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 37 91 26 605 233 656 951 84 26 21 62 317 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 39 96 27 638 246 691 1003 88 27 22 65 334 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 96 27 638 246 691 1003 88 27 22 65 334 PCE Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39 96 27 638 246 691 1003 88 27 22 65 334 --------------------------- -------------- --------------- ..____----------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.56 0.44 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2717 774 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.18 0.13 0.24 0.29 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.21 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.23 0.19 0.56 0.37 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.33 Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.78 0.68 0.44 0.78 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.37 0.63 Delay/Veh: 28.3 32.7 32.7 31.8 33.5 9.9 24.2 22.8 22.7 22.6 33.2 24.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del./Veh: 28.3 32.7 32.7 31.B 33.5 9.9 24.2 22.8 22.7 22.6 33.2 24.0 LOS by Move: C C C C C A C C C C C C 14CM2kAvgQ: 0 2 2 9 7 6 13 1 1 0 2 8 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:43:03 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour _ --------------._.--------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.905 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 __---------- I --------------- --------------- ---------------II --- Volume Module: Base Vol: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 161 317 54 200 215 673 1008 112 31 51 103 397 Added Vol: 6 23 0 9 6 53 50 10 2 0 17 35 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 167 340 54 209 221 726 1058 122 33 51 120 432 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHP Volume: 175 356 57 218 231 759 1106 128 35 53 125 452 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 175 356 57 218 231 759 1106 128 35 53 125 452 PCP•. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 175 356 57 218 231 759 1106 128 35 53 125 452 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.73 0.27 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3049 485 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ------------I-----------------------------II--------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.32 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.28 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.48 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.21 0.30 Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.89 0.89 0.67 0.96 0.56 0.89 0.13 0.08 0.10 0.32 0.93 Delay/Veh: 33.5 51.3 51.3 38.1 79.3 14.3 31.4 20.1 19.9 20.0 25.6 49.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 33.5 51.3 51.3 38.1 79.3 14.3 31.4 20.1 19.9 20.0 25.6 49.0 LOS by Move: C D D D E B C C B C C D HCM2kAvgQ: 3 8 8 4 10 8 16 1 1 1 3 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:42:43 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour _______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 46 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.123 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A r++kkk+kx*x*+kk*k**+++t+**xt*x*++tk*k*xxx****++++r+++Wk*Wr*xr*x***********xx*x** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ _______________1 -------------- ---------------- 11----___________� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I_..------------- --------------- _______________________------_� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial ase: 1 4 1 43 5 56 20 1 1 1 4 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 4 1 72 5 56 20 1 1 1 4 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Volume: 1 5 1 86 6 67 24 1 1 1 5 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 5 1 86 6 67 24 1 1 1 5 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 1 5 1 86 6 67 24 1 1 1 5 26 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- __________-----I Saturation Plow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.17 0.66 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.05 0.05 1.00 0.16 0.84 Final Sat.: 125 500 125 694 768 903 627 33 33 648 130 677 -.. ---------- I--------------- --------------- _______________ __________-_--- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: **** Delay/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.6 7.4 7.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.1 7.2 7.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.6 7.4 7.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.1 7.2 7.2 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.8 7.8 8.3 7.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 7.8 '7.8 8.3 7.2 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf.fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNLMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:43:03 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour ------------ I -------------------------------------------------- Level -------- ----------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.096 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.7 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 6 1 12 5 14 50 8 1 1 2 30 Added Vol: 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 6 1 20 5 14 50 8 1 1 2 59 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 1 7 1 24 6 16 59 10 1 1 2 70 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 7 1 24 6 16 59 10 1 1 2 70 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 1 7 1 24 6 16 59 10 1 1 2 70 ------------ --------------- I--------------- --------------- _____________-- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.12 0.76 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.14 0.02 1.00 0.03 0.97 Final Sat.: 91 543 91 659 725 845 617 103 13 686 30 854 ___________________________--------------- --------------- ____________---� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: t%*# Delay/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.2 7.6 6.9 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.9 7.1 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.2 7.6 6.9 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.9 7.1 7.1 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 7.9 7.7 8.4 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: 7.9 7,7 8.4 7.1 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (e) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to XUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:07 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour _____..__________________..._-____________--_______________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.562 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West. Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- .._I--------------- --------------- --------------- ___________-___ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 ]. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I--------------- _______________ --------------- ________--_____� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1 14 96 2 41 52 731 13 37 562 19 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 1 15 100 2 43 54 761 14 38 585 20 Added Vol: 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 60 15 124 45 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 1 33 100 2 43 54 821 29 162 630 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 856 i0 7.69 657 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 856 30 169 657 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 1 34 104 2 44 56 856 30 169 657 21 ------------ _______________--------------- --------------- H _______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.0"7 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat..: 1205 412 1615 1455 1900 1615 1805 3471 121 1805 3610 161.5 -------------------------- I--------------- --------------- _ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.18 0.01 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.24 0.44 0.44 0.17 0.37 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.56 0.01 0.22 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.49 0.03 Delay/Veh: 22.9 22.9 23.7 28.5 22.9 24.0 18.2 13.0 13.0 25.4 14.9 12.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 22.9 22.9 23.7 28.5 22.9 24.0 18.2 13.0 13.0 25.4 14.9 12.1 LOS by Move: C C C C C C B B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 7 7 4 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:30 Page 2-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour ---------------------------------..-------_-....---------------------_------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Hunco Way (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.673 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ------- ------ II------------------------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 4 46 247 2 105 96 918 11 41 857 23 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 19 4 48 257 2 109 102 955 11 43 892 24 Added Vol: 15 0 127 0 0 0 0 62 2 19 76 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut.: 34 4 175 257 2 109 102 1017 13 62 968 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PIIF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1087 14 66 1034 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1087 14 66 1034 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 36 4 187 275 2 117 109 1087 14 66 1034 26 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.85 0.74 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1375 170 1615 1397 1900 1615 1805 3556 47 1805 3610 1615 ------------ I --------------- ------ ------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.29 0.02 Crit Moves: ***# **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.15 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.10 0.43 0.73 0.00 0.27 0.39 0.73 0.73 0.31 0.76 0.04 Delay/Veh: 16.6 16.6 18.9 27,4 16.1 17.7 23.8 16.7 16.7 25.1 18.7 11.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 16.6 16.6 18.9 27.4 16.1 17.7 23.8 16.7 16.7 25.1 18.7 11.8 LOS by Move: B B B C B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 3 7 0 2 2 11 11 1 11 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun NOV 16, 2014 13:50:07 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour - ------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Bunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.51 Approach: North Bound South Bound Rast Round west Round Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- --------------- --------------- -_-------------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- -'--._----------- --------------- volume -_-----------Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 20 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -_------------_ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I --------------- ---------------II-----------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 14 14 11 21 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1010 884 1076 1608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx Xxxxx 1.009 883 1076 1.608 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx XXXX xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx --------_--- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx XxXx XXXxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xXxx XXXxx xxxx XxXx Xxxxx Control Del; xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * i + A + + + + + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1025 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx, 0.0 xxxxx 0,0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * + * A % A W + ApproachDel: Xxxxxx 8.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A + + Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (o) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:30 Page 3-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HIM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Bunco Way (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.61 ***tit#i#%*%%%%*tt#ti*******it}%i**%iiiiiiriiti#ii}iittiittii*i**t#r%**t*#}*titt Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------------------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ ------------- ..._ --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 20 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRE Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PRE Volume: 0 0 0 21 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 21 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 ------------------ ------- --------------- II --------------- II ------------ ..._� Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I --------------- H --------------- II --------------- II ------------ ....-I Capacity Module: Cnf Ilet Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 6 3 4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1021 893 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1020 893 1087 1631 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx -----_------ I --------- ----- II --------------- -.... ------------- II ---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: + + * + * * A * * + + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1023 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * + + + A * A * * * + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx XXXXXX ApproachLOS: * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traff.ix 7.9.0215 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:07 Page 4-1 Pasadena Industrial. Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour ----------------------- ...----------------------------------------------------------- Level ------------------"'Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.828 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.3 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C +{+war+++#+r+*++r*r#*#+{#*##****#++**#wr++#*#*+*********ww+r{*#*****+++{{{****** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __---------- I --------------- I------- -------II-------------------- Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------ I--------------- --------------- II--------------- ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 987 0 0 1801 491 0 0 0 307 0 420 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bee: 69 1.027 0 0 1874 511 0 0 0 319 0 437 Added Vol: 14 90 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 77 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 83 1117 0 0 1932 569 0 0 0 396 0 438 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 93 1252 0 0 2166 638 0 0 0 444 0 491 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 93 1252 0 0 2166 638 0 0 0 444 0 491 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 93 1252 0 0 2166 638 0 0 0 444 0 491 ------------ ------------------------------ --------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.00 1.52 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2099 0 2169 ----------_- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21, 0.00 0.23 Crit Moves: r*r+ {**+ ##{{ Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 Volume/Cap: 0.55 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.86 Delay/Veh: 36.4 8.9 0.0 0.0 20.4 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.2 0.0 33.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 36.4 8.9 0.0 0.0 20.4 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.2 0.0 33.7 LOS by Move: D A A A C C A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 3 6 0 0 19 15 0 0 0 9 0 10 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane, Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:52:04 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour ________________________..______-___-___-_____-_-__ _ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++++wwwww++wwwwwwrw+ww++wwwwwww+++wrrwww+++++rw+rr+rrwwwww+++++++wrr+rrrrrrrrrrw Intersection 43 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) wwrww+r++rrr++++++r+rwrr++++++++rww+++++rrwrw+++++wr++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Cycle (sec): 119 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.795 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C +++++wrww+w+r++++rw++w++rrwrrrw++r+wrrrwi+++++wwrrwrwrwwwwwwww+wwwwrrrrrrrrwrrrr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- 11--------------- --------------- _______-_______� Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1633 0 0 1307 336 0 0 0 456 0 602 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 143 1699 0 0 1360 350 0 0 0 474 0 626 Added Vol: 86 183 0 0 34 73 0 0 0 40 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 229 1882 0 0 1394 423 0 0 0 514 0 633 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 239 1967 0 0 1456 442 0 0 0 538 0 662 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 239 1967 0 0 1456 442 0 0 0 538 0 662 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 239 1967 0 0 1456 442 0 0 0 538 0 662 ------------ ___------------ --------------- --------------- _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.00 1.55 Final Sat.: 1805 5187 0 0 5187 1615 0 0 0 2049 0 2195 ------------ -------------- ...--------------- --------------- ------___-_____ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.30 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.60 Delay/Veh: 61.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 36.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 61.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 40.6 0.0 D.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 36.0 LOS by Move: E C A A D D A A A C A D HCM2kAvgQ: 10 21 0 0 19 16 0 0 0 12 0 16 w+++++++w+++++++++rw+++++wwwrwr++++++rw+++++++++r++rw++w++r+r++rrwrwrr++++w+++++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. r++rrrw++r+++wwr+w+++++++++++++rrrw+r++rrr+w+rrrw++r+r+r+r+r+r++++++++w+++++++ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:08 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour ________-_ __ ___ __-_-____ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 44 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.931 Loss Time (see): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sea) Average Delay (sea/Veh): 26.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ----- ---------- 11--------------- _______________11_______________ Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- ______________________________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 609 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 40 31 1 134 0 65 0 84 0 0 0 PasserByVol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 876 517 843 1481 0 322 0 278 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 968 571 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 968 571 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 968 571 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- I--------------- I--_____________ Saturation Flow Module- Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2194 0 2088 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- _ _ --------------- _______________� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.35 0.27 0.45 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: %**+ }*++ #*#+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.67 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.70 0.93 0.93 0.68 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.3 42.6 40.1 8.4 0.0 51.8 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 21.3 42.6 40.1 6.4 0.0 51.8 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C D D A A D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 17 15 13 0 9 0 8 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per Lane. Traffix 7,9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:30 Page 5-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.082 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/Veh): 73.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R ------------------ --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 831 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 153 82 3 71 0 115 0 17 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1347 577 868 1042 0 761 0 169 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1420 608 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1420 608 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1420 608 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.82 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 3502 3610 0 2508 0 1630 0 0 0 -___------I--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.38 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: rr** **}* rtW** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.24 0.61 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.08 1.03 1.08 0.50 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 87.1 84.0 99.9 13.5 0.0 100.1 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 87.1 84.0 99.9 13.5 0.0 100.1 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A F F F B A F A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 39 30 26 12 0 25 0 5 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIGB - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:48:35 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative. - With Improvements Morning Peak Hour _-------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.711 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTTMTZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------------- --------------- --------------- -----------_..-.-� Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------_--------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 467 809 1295 0 247 0 186 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 836 486 842 1347 0 257 0 194 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 40 31 1 134 0 65 0 84 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 876 517 843 1481 0 322 0 278 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 968 0 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 968 0 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 968 0 931 1637 0 356 0 307 0 0 0 ---------- --------------- I--------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation __ _Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 3502 3610 0 2175 0 2070 0 0 0 ----__------ I - ------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.27 0.45 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.38 0.64 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 31.7 0.0 25.6 11.7 0.0 35.1 0.0 33.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 31.7 0.0 25.6 11.7 0.0 35.1 0.0 33.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C A C B A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0 12 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:53:46 Page 1-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative - With Improvements Evening Peak Hour --------------..-----_-----__---------_-_---------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.985 Loss Time (sec): 12 (YAR=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R ------------ I --------------- ------------------------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Ignore include Include Include Min. Green: 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ----------- I ------- ------- --------------- ---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1148 476 837. 933 0 621 0 146 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 1194 495 865 971 0 646 0 152 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 153 82 3 71 0 115 0 17 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1347 577 868 1042 0 761 0 169 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1420 0 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1420 0 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Volume: 0 1420 0 914 1098 0 802 0 178 0 0 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- _--------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1..00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.82 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 3502 3610 0 2515 0 1634 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- ----------------------- ------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: ""*+ ++++ •#+• Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.55 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.56 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 51.4 0.0 57.6 13.7 0.0 56.9 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 51.4 0.0 57.6 13.7 0.0 56.9 O.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A D A E B A E A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 20 0 19 11 0 16 0 3 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traff.ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:08 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour ----------- - -------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) x++++xxxx++++x+++++++r+++xr++x+xx++xxx++r+++++xxw++++r+r++xxr+++++r+++x+rrrr+r++ Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EW) +++r+xx++++r++++xxxxx+xww++++++++++++w+x+xxx+++++w+x++++r+++r++rrrw+++++++xxxxr+ Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.698 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ++r++wwx++rrxx+xxxxx+++++++++xxxwwwxxwxr+r+++xxxxx+x+++rr++r+rrxx++r+r+xxxxwrr+r Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ _____________ __ _______________ ___ _____ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________----------- ...--- I--------------- --------------- _______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 83 25 548 202 597 876 67 19 20 51 298 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 36 86 26 570 210 621 911 70 20 21 53 310 Added Vol: 1 6 1 35 33 150 57 16 6 5 18 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 37 92 27 605 243 771 968 86 26 26 71 317 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 39 97 28 638 256 813 1020 90 27 27 75 334 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 97 28 638 256 813 1020 90 27 27 75 334 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39 97 28 638 256 813 1020 90 27 27 75 334 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.55 0.45 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 2698 789 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.18 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.21. Crit Moves: **** ++++ ++++ ++++ Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.23 0.19 0.56 0.37 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.79 0.70 0.51 0.79 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.42 0.64 Delay/Veh: 28.6 32.7 32.7 32.4 34.5 10.4 24.4 22.8 22.6 22.6 33.7 24.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 28.6 32.7 32.7 32.4 34.5 10.4 24.4 22.8 22.6 22.6 33.7 24.2 LOS by Move: C C C C C B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 2 2 9 7 7 13 1 1 1 2 8 +r+rx+++r++++r+xxx+rr+wrrx+++++rr++++r+rxxx+rx++rrrrwxw+r+++r+rr++r+r+++++++w++r Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane, +r+x+rwx++x+xrx++rr+++++r+xxwwxwxxxx++++r++r++w+xxx+++x+x+xxxx++++r+r+xr+++++rrr Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:30 Page 6-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------` ---------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Central Avenue (NS) at Collier Avenue (EN) Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.940 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------ -------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 155 305 52 192 207 647 969 108 30 49 99 382 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial 13se: 161 317 54 200 215 673 1008 112 31 51 103 397 Added Vol: 6 33 5 9 8 71 168 21 2 1 18 35 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 167 350 59 209 223 744 1176 133 33 52 121 432 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 175 366 62 218 233 778 1229 139 35 54 126 452 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 175 366 62 218 233 778 1229 139 35 54 126 452 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1.75 366 62 218 233 778 1229 139 35 54 126 452 --------------------------- --------------- _-------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 1.71 0.29 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3021 510 3502 1900 2842 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 ---------- - I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.35 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.28 Crit Moves: +*** ***r }*W* **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.50 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.55 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.97 0.54 0.93 0.13 0.07 0.10 0.32 0.95 Delay/Veh: 36.9 60.5 60.5 43.2 83.4 14.0 36.0 21.0 20.6 20.8 27.5 57.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 36.9 60.5 60.5 43.2 83.4 14.0 36.0 21.0 20.6 20.8 27.5 57.3 LOS by Move: D E E D F B D C C C C E HCM2kAvgQ: 3 9 9 4 10 8 20 1 1 1 3 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:08 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Morning Peak Hour _______________________________ __ __ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.124 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Lave]. Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __________________11_______________11_______________ _______________� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ____________I_______________ _______________--------------- ____------_-_-_� Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 4 1 41 5 54 19 1 1 1 4 15 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 4 1 43 5 56 20 1 1 1 4 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 29 0 15 2 1 0 0 5 6 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 4 1 72 5 71 22 2 1 1 9 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Volume: 1 5 1 86 6 85 26 2 1 1 11 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 5 1 86 6 85 26 2 1 1 it 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 5 1 86 6 85 26 2 1 1 11 26 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- _______________� Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.17 0.66 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.08 0.04 1.00 0.30 0.70 Final Sat.: 124 494 124 689 762 896 601 56 29 642 233 549 ------------ _____________ ______ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** *#** +*** #}## Delay/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 B.6 7.4 7.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 7.4 7.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.6 7.4 7.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 7.4 7.4 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approachnel: 7.8 7.8 8.3 7.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 7.8 7.8 0.3 7.4 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Sun Nov 16, 2014 13:50:30 Page 7-1 Pasadena Industrial Park Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Evening Peak Hour ------__-..---------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Central Avenue (NS) at Pasadena Street (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.128 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sea) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Optimal. Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 -- I---------------------------------------------_--------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 6 1 12 5 13 48 8 1 1 2 29 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 1 6 1 12 5 14 50 8 1 1 2 30 Added Vol: 0 0 0 8 0 2 15 5 0 0 1 29 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 6 1 20 5 16 65 13 1 1 3 59 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.05 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 1 7 1 24 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 70 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 7 1 24 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 70 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 7 1 24 6 18 77 16 1 1 4 70 ------------ --------------- ---_--__------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.12 0.76 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.17 0.01 1.00 0.05 0.95 Final Sat.: 89 534 89 649 713 830 598 123 10 683 43 833 ------------ I --------------------------------------------- _______________� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.3 7.6 7.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 7.9 7.1 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.3 7.6 7.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 7.9 7.1 7.1 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 8.0 7.7 8.6 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel.: 8.0 7.7 8.6 7.1 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAVgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUN'LMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA ..:i .a .SFS.., Nom, a .�S Cn ..:. ay. .. 1.ii�.'. .. x .. _ .� KLINZMAN AssocIATES, INC. OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT 4ERVICE March 26, 2015 Mr. Steve Rawlings RAWLINGS COMPANY REALTYADVISORS P.O. Box 96 Murrieta, CA 92564 Dear Mr. Rawlings: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide this freeway merge/diverge analysis for the Pasadena Industrial Park project as a supplement for the Pasadena Industrial Park Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc., on November 14, 2014. The project site is located adjacent to Hunco Way between Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street in the City of Lake Elsinore. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. It should be noted that this freeway merge/diverge analysis has been prepared at the request of the California Department of Transportation (see Appendix B). FREEWAY MERGE/DIVERGE ANALYSIS A ramp junction is an area of competing traffic demands. Entering on-ramp vehicles merge into the adjacent traffic lane competing for space with upstream freeway traffic combining into one stream. In a merge area, individual on-ramp vehicles attempt to find gaps in the adjacent freeway lane traffic stream. The action of individual merging vehicles entering the traffic stream introduces turbulence to traffic flow in the vicinity of the ramp gore area. Approaching freeway vehicles move toward the left to avoid this turbulence, or create gaps for entering vehicles. Exiting off -ramp vehicles diverge from upstream traffic separating into two streams. Exiting vehicles must occupy the lane adjacent to the freeway stream or the off -ramp. This has a redistributing effect on other freeway vehicles, as they move left to avoid the turbulence of the immediate diverge area. Ramps have a limited storage capacity. If capacity is exceeded at the merge point, local congestion and queuing occurs, which may ultimately spill back onto the roadway network. The same is true for diverging vehicles. If capacity is exceeded at the diverge point, queuing can back onto the freeway mainline. Both queuing scenarios should be avoided. 1111 TOWN & COUNrRV ROAD, SUITE 34 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868 (714)973-8383 WWW. FRArrlc-ENIGINeeR.con1 Mr. Steve Rawlings RAWLINGS COMPANY REALTY ADVISORS March 26, 2015 METHODOLOGY The freeway ramp merge/diverge analysis was conducted using the Transportation Research Board, 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 methodology merge/diverge density using the HCS+ software, Version 6.65. The analysis is based on the typical weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. LEVEL OF SERVICE Levels of Service in a merge influence area or diverge influence area is defined in terms of density for all cases of stable operation, Level of Service A through Level of Service E. Level of Service F exists when the demand exceeds the capacity of the on-ramp or off -ramp. The Transportation Research Board, 2010 Highway Capacity Manual states that Level of Service F is unacceptable because congestion is likely to occur, therefore Level of Service E should not be exceeded. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service D as the maximum acceptable Level of Service. Level of Service A: Unrestricted operations. Density is low enough to permit smooth merging/diverging, with virtually no turbulence in the traffic stream. Level of Service A represents a density of passenger cars per mile per lane of less than or equal to 10. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service A as an acceptable Level of Service. Level of Service B: Merging/diverging maneuvers become noticeable to through drivers and minimum turbulence occurs. Level of Service B represents a density of passenger cars per mile per lane of greater than 10 to 20. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service B as an acceptable Level of Service. Level of Service C: Speed within the influence area begins to decline as turbulence levels become noticeable. Both ramp and freeway vehicles begin to adjust their speed to accomplish smooth transitions. Level of Service C represents a density of passenger cars per mile per lane of greater than 20 to 28. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service C as an acceptable Level of Service. Level of Service D: Turbulence levels in the influence area become intrusive and virtually all vehicles slow to accommodate merging/diverging. Some ramp queues may form at heavily used on - ramps, but freeway operations remain stable. Level of Service D represents a density of passenger cars per mile per lane of greater than 28 to 35. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service D as the maximum acceptable Level of Service. W W W: I-RAFFIC-ENG I NEER.COM 2 Mr. Steve Rawlings RAWLINGS COMPANY REALTY ADVISORS March 26, 2015 Level of Service E: Conditions approaching capacity. Speeds reduce significantly and turbulence is felt by virtually all drivers. Flow levels approach capacity and small changes in demand or disruptions within the traffic stream can cause both ramp and freeway queues to form. Level of Service E represents a density of passenger cars per mile per lane of greater 35. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service E as an unacceptable Level of Service. Level of Service F: Demand exceeds the capacity of the on-ramp or off -ramp. The California Department of Transportation has defined Level of Service E as an unacceptable Level of Service. STUDY AREA The merge/diverge analysis analyzes the Central Avenue/1-15 Freeway interchange n the City of Lake Elsinore. A merge analysis has been conducted for the 1-15 Freeway WB On -Ramp at Central Avenue, and at the 1-15 Freeway EB On -Ramp at Central Avenue. A diverge analysis has been conducted for the 1-15 Freeway WB Off -Ramp at Central Avenue and at the 1-15 Freeway EB Off -Ramp at Central Avenue. TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Traffic volume data is from the Pasadena Industrial Park Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc., on November 14, 2014, the 2013 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways by the California Department of Transportation, and 2013 Ramp Volumes on the California State Freeway System by the California Department of Transportation. An annual ambient growth rate of 1% has been applied over 2013 traffic volumes for Existing (2014) traffic volumes and Opening Year (2016) traffic volumes. ANALYSIS Table 1 shows the turning movement volume summary for left and right turn lanes at the Central Avenue/1-15 Freeway interchange for each analysis scenario. Table 2 summarizes results of the merge/diverge analyses conducted at the Central Avenue/1-15 Freeway interchange. Merge/diverge analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix C. CONCLUSIONS For Existing traffic conditions, the study area merge/diverge areas currently operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. For Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area merge/diverge areas are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. WWW,TRAFFIC.-rNGINEPR.COM Mr. Steve Rawlings RAWLINGS COMPANY REALTY ADVISORS March 26, 2015 For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area merge/diverge areas are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the study area merge/diverge areas are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. For Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative traffic conditions, the study area merge/diverge areas are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. It has been a pleasure to service your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 973-8383. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Bryan Crawford Associate //Q,pF ESS/pN 9 Z w N0.TROO56 z n d * F\9 \�UF CA41�� W W W.TRAFFI C-ENGI NEER.COM KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. William Kunzman, P.E. Principal Table 1 Turning Movement Volume Summary for Left and Right Turn Lanes rhr�wlue lsPM-n "ou'd valirei' rM it, fiG/13I=A14l Turning Movement Volume Summary for left and Right T'ur'n Lana Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L R L R L R L R Intersection Centra l Avenue(NS) at: 615 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) -Existing 66/137 NA NA 491/336 NA NA 307/456 420/602 - Existing Plus Project 74/193 NA NA 491/336 NA NA 353/463 420/602 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project 77/199 NA NA 511/350 NA NA 365/481 437/626 - Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative 75/173 NA NA 569/423 NA NA 350/507 438/633 -Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative 83/229 NA NA 569/423 NA NA 396/514 438/633 lIP Freeway EB Ram, (EW) -Existing NA 467/476 809/831 NA 247/621 186/146 NA NA - Existing Plus Project NA 474/523 809/831 NA 247/621 241/155 NA NA - Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project NA 493/542. 842/885 NA 257/646 249/161 NA NA - Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative NA 510/530 843/868 NA 322/761 223/160 NA NA - Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Protect Plus Cumulatmo I NA 1 517/577 843/868 NA 1 322/761 278/169 NA NA rhr�wlue lsPM-n "ou'd valirei' rM it, fiG/13I=A14l Table 2 Merge/Diverge Analysis' The freeway ramp merge/diverge analysis was conducted using the Transportation Research Board, 2010 nlvhway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology merge and diverge density using the IICS+software, Version 6.65. In locations where an upstream ramp and a downstream ramp are present, both have been arra lyzed and the mast degraded Level of Service has been reported. Existing Plus Existing Plus Existing Plus Ambient Growth Existing Ambient Growth Ambient Growth Plus Project Existing Plus Project Plus Project Plus Cumulative Plus Cumulative Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Morning Fiverung. Morning Evening Morning Evening Morning I Evening Morning Evening Ramp Central Avenue (NS) at: 1-15 Freeway W8 Ramps (EW) Merge 17.3-13 25.1-C 17.4-13 25.5-C 17.9-B 26.2-C 18.4-13 26.6-C 18.4-13 27.0-C Diverge 18.1-B 26.7-C 18.2-13 26.7-C 18.6-B 27.2-C 18.6-13 27.3-C 18.7-13 27.3-C 1-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Diverge 25.2-C 25.0-C 25.3-C 25.0-C 25.8-C 25.5-C 25.8-C 25.7-C 25.9-C 25.8-C Merge 29.8-D 29.1-D 29.8-D 29.5-D 30.7-D 30.6-D 30.9-D 30.3-D 30.9-D 30.7-D The freeway ramp merge/diverge analysis was conducted using the Transportation Research Board, 2010 nlvhway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology merge and diverge density using the IICS+software, Version 6.65. In locations where an upstream ramp and a downstream ramp are present, both have been arra lyzed and the mast degraded Level of Service has been reported. APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow tirne. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic -actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI -MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN -DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN -LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC -ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP -END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. APPENDIX B CALTRANS LETTER S IAf. OF CALIFORNIA CALIPfJJ2fSIA 5'I A'I L'FRANSPORIA I ION AGI NC I' RDMUNOG. IBRO WNrr. Gnvcmor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DI STILI CT 8 PLANNING (MS 722) 464 WEST O^ STIOTT. 6°i Moor SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-4557 FAX (909) 383-5936 TTY (909)383-6300 www. clot, ca. gov/d ist8 March 18, 2015 City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Attention: Project Planner P.O. Box 96 Murrieta, CA 92564 Pasadena Industrial Park (R1V 15 PM 22.24/Riv 74 PM 15.97) S'erima drovghl Help save 1vole, I We have completed our review for the above mentioned proposal of a partially built and in operation with 152,405 square feet of light industrial proposed to be built via eight different buildings oil currently vacant lots. The proposed project will have access to Collier Avenue and Pasadena Street via Hunco Way. As the owner and operator of the State Highway System (SHS), it is our responsibility to coordinate and consult with local jurisdictions when proposed development may impact our facilities. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), we are required to make recommendations to offset associated impacts with the proposed project. Although the project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Lake Elsinore due to the Project's potential impact to State facilities it is also subject to the policies and regulations that govern the SHS. We recommend the following: • Please include ramp merge/diverge analysis at Interstate -15 northbound and southbound direction at the Central Avenue Interchange to determine impacts of the development at this location. Caltrans reserves the right to comment on this project at a later time if needed. If this development proposal is later modified in any way, please forward copies of revised plans as necessary so that we may reevaluate all proposed changes for potential impacts to the State Route-74/Interstate-15. We appreciate the opportunity to offer comments concerning this project. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Talvin Dennis at (909) 806-3957 or myself at (909) 383-4557 for assistance. Sincerely, "Provide n qf.. sersluino6l" iNegrale'd mrd e cienl lranspw'trrlion ayslem to errhanee Cali/ornia's econoup+and livability" March 18, 2015 Page 2 Original signed by Mark Roberts MARK ROBERTS Office Chief Intergovernmental Review, Community and Regional Planning 'M'a'id"a'q& sustainable, med osd efficwmumrrponmion sysimx is enhance Cahfrn'nia's ecmrairy arrd livabilifi" APPENDIX C MERGE/DIVERGE WORKSHEETS H -H Existing HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: rge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/25/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: 1-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) reeway Da Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Ramp Da Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Merge 3 70.0 mph 3000 vph Right 1 35.0 mph 557 vph 1400 ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 232 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp off Distance to adjacent Ramp 5288 ft Conversion to pc/h under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph.) 3000 557 Peak -hour factor, PAF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 815 151 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade o Length mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 232 vph 0.92 63 v 5 % 0 Level ml 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3342 621 258 pcph ________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas --------------------- L = 897.88 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = v (P ) = 2061 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 3963 7200 No FO v or v 1281 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2061 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ----------------- Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2682 4600 No 12A __________Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.3 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B ______ _______________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.280 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 62.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 63.7 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel ].ane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp way On Ramp Da Merge 3 70.0 4573 Right 1 35.0 473 1400 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 252 Upstream Off 5288 Conversion to pc/h Under Base Condit mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent. Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4573 473 252 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1243 129 68 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade Length mi mi. Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 mi vph v Is Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5095 527 281 ------- _--------------- Estimation of V12 Merge Areas ------------- L = 1252.91 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = v (P ) = 3142 pc/h 12 F FM ---------------- ___Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5622 7200 No FO v or v 1953 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3142 12A WE Yes pcph (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? V 3669 4600 No 12A ____Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 25.1 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C --------- ----------------- Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.376 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 59.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.2 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysi Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Junction Components Freeway Data (EW) Diverge 3 70.0 mph 2871 vph Off Ramp Data Right 2871 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 35.0 mph 727 vph 700 ft 5 ft jacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 129 Downstream On 4075 vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2871 727 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v1.5 780 198 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 129 0.92 35 5 0 Level 0.00 a mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3199 810 ______Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.643 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2346 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v = 0.501 Fi F v = v - v FO F R v S = 56.0 R mph ____Capacity Checks Actual Maximum 3199 7200 2389 7200 Ou v or v 853 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2346 12A V 12 LOS F? No No 0.976 1.00 144 pcph 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Diverge Influence Actual Max Desirable Violation? 2346 4400 No __Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 18.1 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.501 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 76.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.3 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist.? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Da Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4376 vph ff Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1058 vph 700 ft ft jacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 144 Downstream On 4075 vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4376 1058 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v].5 1189 287 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 o 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 144 0.92 39 5 0 Level 0.00 s mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4875 1179 160 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.584 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3337 pc/h 12 R F R FD ___________________________Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4875 7200 No Fi F v = v - v 3696 7200 No FO F R v 1179 2000 No R v or v 1538 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3337 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3337 4400 No 12 ___Level of service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 26.7 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C __________________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.534 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.0 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analys Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kun2man Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at T-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Junction Components Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4416 vph Off Ramp Data --- Right 1 35.0 433 '740 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 141 Downstream On 5240 mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4416 433 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1200 118 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 a 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE. ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 141 0.92 38 5 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v a Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4920 482 ______Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.615 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3211 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Actual V = v 4920 Fi F v = v - v 4438 FO F R v 482 R v or v 1.709 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3211 12A Maximum LOS F? 7200 No 7200 No 0.976 1.00 157 pcph 2000 No (Equation 1.3-14 or 13-17) RM No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ----------- ___Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area ---- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3211 4400 No 12 ___ _______Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.2 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C __________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.471 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.8 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: 1-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Junction Components ff Ramp Da Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4243 vph Right 4243 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 35.0 mph 767 vph 740 ft 5 ft acent Ramp Data (.i.f one exists) Yes 153 Downstream On 5240 vph ft sion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4243 767 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1153 208 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1..2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 153 0.92 42 5 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph V L Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4727 855 170 pcph _Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or. 13-13) EQ P = 0.602 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3188 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Fi F v = v - v FO F R v R ____Capacity Checks Actual Maximum 4727 7200 3872 7200 855 v or v 1539 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3188 12A LOS F? No No 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) as LM (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) __________________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual. Max Desirable Violation? V 3188 4400 No 12 ________Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.0 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area, Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, D = 0.505 S S = 55.9 mph R S = 74.7 mph 0 S = 60.9 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: rge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp Freeway Merge 3 70.0 mph 4226 vph On Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1276 vph 1400 ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 162 Downstream Off 3820 vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Volume, V (vph) 4226 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1148 Trucks and buses 5 Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Ramp 1276 0.92 347 5 0 Level mi mi 1.5 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 162 vph 0.92 44 v 5 e 0 0 Level mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4708 1422 180 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 693.91 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2903 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6130 7200 No FO v or v 1805 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2903 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-].9) 12A _____________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area -- ---------- Actual Max Desirable violation? v 4325 4600 No 12A ___________Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 29.8 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D ____________________________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.518 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.1 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Description: Central Avenue (NS) at T-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp Freeway Data On Ramp Da (EW) Merge 3 70.0 mph 4060 vph Right 1 35.0 mph 1307 vph 1400 ft ft jacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 176 Downstream Off 3820 vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4060 1307 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1103 355 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade Length mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 176 vph 0.92 48 v 5 0 Level ml ml 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4523 1456 196 pcph ---------------------- _--- Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 755.59 (Equation 13-6 or. ].3-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2789 pc/h 12 F FM v FO ____Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? 5979 7200 No v or v 1734 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2789 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 4245 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 29.1 pc/mi/In R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.495 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.1 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.6 mph Existing Plus Project HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Runzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at 1-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp reeway Data Merge 3 70.0 3000 Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 565 1400 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 232 Upstream Off 5288 mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Volume, V (vph) 3000 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0,92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 815 Trucks and buses 5 Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Ramp 565 0.92 154 5 0 Leve]. mi mi 1.5 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 232 vph 0.92 63 v 5 0 Level M1 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3342 629 258 pcph v FO of V12 Merge Areas___ L = 899.59 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2061 pc/h 12 F FM ____Capacity checks_ Actual Maximum 3971 7200 v 12A LOS F? No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area — ------------------- Actual Max Desirable Violation? 2690 4600 No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.4 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence a Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.280 S S = 62.1 mph R S = 67.2 mph 0 S = 63.7 mph pc/mi/In v or v 1281 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2061 12A v 12A LOS F? No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area — ------------------- Actual Max Desirable Violation? 2690 4600 No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.4 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence a Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.280 S S = 62.1 mph R S = 67.2 mph 0 S = 63.7 mph pc/mi/In HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway reeway Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 4573 vph On Ramp Data Side of freeway Yes Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 vph Free-flow Position of adjacent Ramp speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 529 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 252 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 5288 ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4573 529 252 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1243 144 68 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade °s o 0 Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2. 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5095 589 281 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 1266.18 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = V (P ) = 3142 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual v 5684 FO v or v 1953 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3142 12A Maximum LOS F? 7200 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) as Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3731 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 25.5 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.386 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 59.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.0 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project. Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp (EW) Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 2871 vph ff Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 773 700 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 129 Downstream On 4075 _____________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Condit Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2871 773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 780 27.0 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 o 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 mph vph ft ft vph ft Adjacent Ramp 129 0.92 35 5 0 Leve]. 0.00 mi 0.00 mi. 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3199 861 Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas --- L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.640 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2358 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Fi F V = v - v FO F R v R --capacity Checks_ Actual Maximum 3199 7200 2338 MM V or v 841 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2358 12A 7200 2000 LOS F? No No No 0.976 1.00 144 pcph (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ___Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2358 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 18.2 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B ________ ______Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, D = 0.505 S S = 55.8 mph R S = 76.8 mph 0 S = 60.2 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I -1S Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Freeway Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Off Ramp Da Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4376 vph Right 1 35.0 mph 1065 vph 700 ft vph ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 144 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 4075 ft ________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4376 1065 144 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1189 289 39 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 s 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 S 1.00 Flow rate, vp mph 4875 1187 160 pcph ___________Estimation S = 74.7 of V12 Diverge Areas 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.584 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3339 pc/h 12 R F R FD _____________________Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4875 7200 No Fi F V = v - v 3688 7200 No FO F R v 1187 2000 No R v or v 1536 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3339 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3339 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 26.7 pc/mi./In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ____Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.535 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.0 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _____________________________Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) _ Freeway Data Type of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 3 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 4416 vph ______Off Ramp Data Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free -Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 488 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 740 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft ----------------------- _Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 141 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 5240 ft ______________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4416 488 147. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1200 133 38 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level. Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 0.00 0 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.S 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4920 544 ___Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.612 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3222 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Che Actual v = v 4920 Fi F v = v - v 4376 FO F R v 544 R v or v 1698 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3222 12A v 12 Maximum LOS F? 7200 No 7200 No 2000 No 0.976 1.00 157 pcph (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? 3222 4400 No Level of Service Determination (if not F) ----------------- -------- Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.3 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ______Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.477 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, s = 61.6 mph pc/mi/In HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: iverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane (EW) Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4243 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 776 740 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) mph vph ft ft Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes volume on adjacent ramp 153 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 5240 ft ________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4243 776 153 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1153 211 42 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 0.00 01 0.00 0 0.00 0 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi_ 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 472.7 865 170 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.602 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3190 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Fi F v = v - v FO F R v R ____Capacity Checks__ Actual Maximum 4727 7200 3862 7200 v or v 1537 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3190 12A LOS F? No No 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-1.8, or 13-19) -------------------- Entering Diverge Influence Area ------------------ Actual Max Desirable Violation? V 3190 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L 25.0 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.506 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.8 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel./decel lane Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 4226 vph On Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1283 vph 1400 ft ft jacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 1.62 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Downstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 3820 ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4226 1283 162 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 3.148 349 44 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade o a Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 mi mi 1.5 mi 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4708 1429 180 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas__ L = 693.91 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2903 pc/h 12 F FM ____ ______________Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6137 7200 No FO v or v 1805 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2903 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 4332 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 29.8 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D ______Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.520 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.3 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.0 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing Plus Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane reeway Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 4060 vph On Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1354 vph 1400 ft ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 176 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Downstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 3820 ft _____________ Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4060 1354 176 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1103 368 48 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 06 O�s Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4523 1509 196 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas___ L = 755.59 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2789 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6032 7200 No FO v or v 1734 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2789 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) __ __Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 4298 4600 No 12A 1 of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 29.5 pc/mi/in R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D ______Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.510 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.7 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 58.2 mph. Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel. lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp ,Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp Freeway Data Merge 3 70.0 3060 Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 588 1400 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 241 Upstream Off 5288 (EW) mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 3060 588 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 832 160 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade Length mi. Trucks and. buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 241 vph 0.92 65 v 5 % 0 Level mi mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3409 6SS 269 pcph _________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 919.50 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2102 pc/h 12 F FM v FO ___Capacity Checks Actual Maximum 4064 7200 v or v 1307 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2102 12A LOS F? No (Equation 13 14 or 13-17) NO Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ------------------ ____Flow Entering Merge Influence Area_ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2757 4600 No 12A _______________Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.9 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B d Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.284 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 62.0 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 63.6 mph pc/mi/In HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp eway Da Merge 3 70.0 4665 On Ramp Dat Right 1 35.0 549 1400 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 261 Upstream Off 5288 (EW) mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Volume, V (vph) 4665 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1268 Trucks and buses 5 Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Ramp 549 0.92 149 5 0 Level mi mi 1.5 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 261 vph 0.92 71 v 5 % 0 Level mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5197 612 291 pcph v FO stimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 1292.93 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = V (P ) = 3205 pc/h 12 F FM ____Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? 5809 7200 No v or v 1992 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3205 12A as Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3817 4600 No 12A ------------------ Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 26.2 pc/mi/in R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C _______________________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.400 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 58.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.7 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane (EW) Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 2928 vph Off Ramp Data_____ Right 1 35.0 802 700 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) mph vph ft ft Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 133 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 4075 ft Junction Components Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2928 802 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 796 27.8 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 7.33 0.92 36 5 0 Level 11 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v °a Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3262 894 148 pcph ____Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.637 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2403 pc/h 12 R F R FD V = v = 0.508 Fi F v = v - v FO F R v mean speed in ramp influence area, R 55.8 _Capacity Checks Actual Maximum 3262 7200 2368 7200 894 2000 v or v 859 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2403 12A LOS F? No No We (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-1.5, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2403 4400 No 12 _____Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v -- 0.009 11 18.6 pc/mi/in R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B _______Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.508 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S 55.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 76.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.1 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: iverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane eway Da Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4464 vph Off Ramp Data Right 4464 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 35.0 mph 1107 vph 700 ft 5 ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes volume on adjacent ramp 144 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 4075 ft Junction Components Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4464 1107 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1213 301 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 144 0.92 39 5 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4973 1233 160 pcph __Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.579 Using Equation 9 FD V = v + (v - v ) P = 3398 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Fi F V = v - v FO F R v R ___Capacity Actual 4973 3740 1233 v or v 1575 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v 3398 12A Maximum LOS F? 7200 No 7200 No 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) --------------------- Entering Diverge Influence Area -------- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3398 4400 No 12 _________Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 27.2 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C __Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area, Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, D = 0.539 S S = 54.9 mph R S = 74.5 mph 0 S = 59.9 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: iverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: 1-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Junction Components (EW) Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4505 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 506 740 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 146 Downstream On 5240 mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4505 506 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1224 137 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 146 vph 0.92 40 v 5 0 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5019 564 163 pcph __________________Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P - 0.609 Using Equation 9 FD V v + (v - v ) P = 3275 pc/h 12 R F R FD __Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 5019 7200 No Pi F v = v - V 4455 7200 No FO F R V 564 2000 No R v or v 1744 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3275 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ____ ___________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3275 4400 No 12 ___Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.8 pc/mi/lr. R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C __Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.479 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 73.9 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.6 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: iverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: 1-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane (EW) Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4328 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 807 740 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) mph vph it ft Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 158 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 5240 ft __Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4328 807 158 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v7.5 1176 219 43 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level revel Grade 0.00 s 0.00 0 0.00 0 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4822 899 176 pcph ------------------------- Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.598 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3245 pc/h 12 R F R FD Capacity Checks v or v 1577 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3245 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) us ME (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) __Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area ---------- -- ----- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3245 4400 No 12 ---------- Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.5 pc/mi/lrr R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ----------------------- Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 4822 7200 No Fi F Space mean speed v = v - v 3923 7200 No FO F R R v 899 2000 No R S = 74.5 mph v or v 1577 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3245 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) us ME (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) __Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area ---------- -- ----- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3245 4400 No 12 ---------- Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.5 pc/mi/lrr R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ----------------------- Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.509 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.5 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.B mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Freeway Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 4311 vph On Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1335 vph 1400 ft ft _____--_________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 171 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Downstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 3820 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4311 1335 171 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1171 363 46 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade o Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4803 1487 191 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 736.31 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2962 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Chec Actual v 6290 FO V or v 1841 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2962 12A Maximum TOA F? 7200 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ____Flow Entering Merge Influence Area --------------- --- Actual Max Desirable violation? v 4449 4600 No 12A ____Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L 30.7 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D ---------------------- __Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area, Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.557 S S = 54.4 mph R S = 65.2 mph 0 S = 57.2 mph pc/mi/in HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Project Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) reeway Data Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway On Ramp Da Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Merge 3 70.0 mph 4141 vph Right 1. 35.0 mph 1,127 vph 1400 ft ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 185 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Downstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 3820 ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4141 1427 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1125 388 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational. vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade Length mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 185 vph 0.92 50 v 5 % 0 % Level mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4614 1590 206 pcph __Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 794.14 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = v (P ) = 2845 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6204 7200 No FO v or v 1769 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2845 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable violation? v 4435 4600 No 12A __Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L 30.6 pc/mi/ln R R 1.2 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D _________________________Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.552 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.3 mph Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: rge Analys Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at 1-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway way Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 3060 vph On Ramp Data Side of freeway Yes Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 vph Free-flow Position of adjacent Ramp speed on ramp 35.0 mph volume on ramp 644 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 241 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 5288 ft ___________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 3060 644 241 vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 832 175 65 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 0 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fxV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3409 717 269 pcph Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 932.76 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2102 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks ------------------Flow Entering Merge Influence Area --- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2819 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + Actual Maximum LOS F? v R 4126 7200 No FO A Level of service for v or v 1307 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 1.3-17) 3 av34 Estimation Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No M 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 area, S = 61.9 If yes, v = 2102 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) R 12A Space mean ------------------Flow Entering Merge Influence Area --- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2819 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 18.4 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B -------- _____---------- _Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.288 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 61.9 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 67.1 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 63.5 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/207.5 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp Data Merge 3 70.0 4665 On Ramp Dat Right 1 35.0 596 1400 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 261 Upstream Off 5288 (EW) mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Volume, V (vph) 4665 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1268 Trucks and buses 5 Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Ramp 596 0.92 162 5 0 Level mi mi. 1.5 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 261 vph 0.92 71 v 5 e 0 % Level mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, f.HV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5197 664 291 ________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 1304.05 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 3205 pc/h 12 F FM _____________Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5861 7200 No FO V or v 1992 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v 3205 12A pcph (Equation 1.3-1.5, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3869 4600 No 12A _Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 26.6 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C ___ Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.410 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 58.5 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 64.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.5 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp _Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 2928 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 788 '700 acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 133 Downstream On 4075 mph vph ft ft vph. ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2928 788 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 796 214 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 a 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 mi Adjacent Ramp 133 0.92 36 5 0 Level 0.00 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3262 878 Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas___ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.638 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2399 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Fi F V = v - v FO F R v R capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? 3262 7200 No 2384 7200 No MW v or v 863 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2. 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2399 12A 0.976 1.00 148 pcph 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_ ___ __ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2399 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 18.6 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.507 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 76.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.2 mph pc/mi/ln HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analys Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Freeway Dat Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Off Ramp Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4464 vph Right 1 35.0 mph 1140 vph 700 ft vph ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 144 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 4075 ft ___________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4464 7.140 144 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1213 310 39 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 - 0.00 0 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1..5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 = 0.542 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4973 1270 160 pcph Space ___Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas _____--_____ S = 54.8 mph L = (Equation 13-1.2 or 13-13) R EQ Space mean speed in outer lanes, S P = 0.577 Using Equation 9 mph FD 0 v = V + (v - v ) P = 3408 pc/h Space mean speed for all vehicles, S 12 R F R FD mph _____ Capacity Checks___ Actual Maximum LOS F? v = V 4973 7200 No Fi F v = v - v 3703 7200 No FO F R v 1270 2000 No R v or v 1565 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3408 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or .1.3-19) 12A ____________________ Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area --------------------- __________Actual Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3408 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 27.3 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C _Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.542 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.8 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Freeway Data (EW) Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4505 vph ff Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 545 740 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 146 Downstream On 5240 mph vph It It vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4505 545 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1224 148 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 1 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 mi Adjacent Ramp 146 0.92 40 5 0 Level 0.00 s 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Actual 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 12 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5019 607 Determination (if not F) 163 pcph. Density, ___Estimation 4.252 + of V12 Diverge Areas R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway L = junction areas of influence C (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) Speed Estimation EQ P = 0.607 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3283 pc/h 12 R F R FD _________ Checks _Capacity Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 5019 7200 No Pi F v = v - v 4412 7200 No FO F R v 607 2000 No R v or v 1736 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3283 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A _________ ___Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_ ........ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3283 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.8 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, D = 0.483 S S = 56.5 mph R S = 73.9 mph 0 S = 61..5 mph pc/mi/In HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysi Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at 2-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Freeway Data (EW) Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4328 vph Off Ramp Data Right Freeway 1 Volume, V (vph) 35.0 mph 921 vph 740 ft 1176 ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 158 Downstream On 5240 Conversion to pc/h Under Base Condit Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4328 921 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1176 250 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 01 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1,2 vph ft Adjacent Ramp 158 0.92 43 5 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4822 1026 176 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas___ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.592 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3274 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v Max Desirable Violation? Fi F v = v - v FO F R v Service Determination (if not F) R D = 4.252 + _Capacity Checks__ Actual Maximum 4822 7200 3796 1026 v or v 1548 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 if yes, v = 3274 12A 7200 2000 LOS F? No No No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Intermediate speed variable, Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3274 4400 No 12 space mean speed in ramp influence area, S Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 2.5.7 pc/mi/ln Space mean R S 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation -------- Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.520 S space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.7 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.4 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Merge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Ambient + Cumulativ Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Freeway Data (EW) Merge 3 70.0 mph 4311 vph On Ramp Data Side of freeway Yes Right Number of lanes in ramp I vph Free-flow Position of adjacent Ramp speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 1353 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft acent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 171 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Downstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 3820 ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4311 1353 171 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1171 368 46 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade o Length mi mi_ mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4803 1507 v FO Estimation of V12 Merge Areas___ L = 736.31 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2962 pc/h 12 F FM ___Capacity Checks_____________ Actual Maximum LOS F? 6310 7200 No v or v 1841 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2962 12A 0.976 1.00 191 pcph (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) M Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ________________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area _ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 4469 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 30.9 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area, Space mean speed in outer. lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.563 S S = 54.2 mph R S = 65.2 mph 0 S = 57.0 mph pc/mi/In Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976. 0.976 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 7..00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4614 1558 206 pcph imation of V12 Merge Areas L = 794.14 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = v (P ) = 2845 pc/h 12 F FM ------------ ------------ Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6172 7200 No FO v or v 1769 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2845 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable violation? v 4403 4600 No 12A ------------ Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 30.3 PC/mi/in R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.542 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.8 mph R space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.5 mph Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: rge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway eway Data Merge 3 70.0 mph 3060 vph On Ramp Data Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp I Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp Upstream 652 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft Length of second accel/decel lane Distance to adjacent Ramp ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 241 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 5288 ft ______________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 3060 652 241 vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 832 177 65 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 mi 1.5 mi mi Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1..5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3409 726 269 peph v FO _______Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 934.69 (Equation 1.3-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2102 pc/h 12 F FM ___Capacity Checks__ Actual Maximum 4135 7200 v or v 1307 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2102 12A LOS F? No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or. 13-19) ----------------- — ---- Flow Entering Merge Influence Area.......... Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2828 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 18.4 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence P ___ Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.289 S S = 61.9 mph R S = 67.1 mph 0 S = 63.5 mph pc/mi/In HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: rge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc, Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WE Ramps (EW) eway Data Type of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 3 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 4665 vph ---------------------------------- On Ramp Data Side of freeway. Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 652 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 1400 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent Ramp 261 vph Position of adjacent Ramp Upstream Type of adjacent Ramp Off Distance to adjacent Ramp 5288 it Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4665 652 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1268 177 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade Length mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 261 vph 0.92 71 v 5 s 0 Level mi 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5197 726 stimation of V12 Merge L = 1317.32 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM V = v (P ) = 3205 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 5923 7200 No FO v or v 1992 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3205 12A 0.976 1.00 291 pcph (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No Yes (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3931 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 27.0 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space meanspeed in ramp influence area, Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, M = 0.422 S S = 58.2 mph R S = 64.6 mph 0 S = 60.2 mph pc/mi/in HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Freeway Data Diverge 3 70.0 mph 2928 vph ff Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 834 700 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 133 Downstream On 4075 mph vph ft ft vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2928 834 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 796 227 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 133 0.92 36 5 0 Level % 0.00 0 mi 0.00 mi 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 3262 929 148 pcph _—Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas___ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.636 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2412 pc/h 12 R F R FD --------- __-------- _—__Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 3262 7200 No Fi F v = v - v 2333 7200 No FO F R v 929 2000 No R v or v 850 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 241.2 12A (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) __---__Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area --------------------- Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2412 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 18.7 pc/mi/In R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence B Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.512 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 55.7 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 76.8 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 60.0 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: Diverge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: 2-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway WH Ramps (EW) Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane reeway Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4464 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 1147 vph 700 ft It Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 144 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 4075 ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4464 1147 144 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1213 312 39 Trucks and buses 5 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.7. 1.2 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4973 1278 160 pcph Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas___ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.577 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3410 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v = 0.543 Fi F v = v - v FO F R v S = 54.8 R mph Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? 4973 7200 No 3695 1278 v or v 1563 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3410 12A v 12 7200 No 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No !M (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) _____Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_ Actual Max Desirable violation? 3410 4400 No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 27.3 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.543 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.6 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 59.8 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Morning Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) Freeway Da Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Off Ramp Da Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4505 vph Right 1 35.0 mph 600 vph 740 ft vph ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Does adjacent ramp exist? Yes Volume on adjacent ramp 1.46 vph Position of adjacent ramp Downstream Type of adjacent ramp On Distance to adjacent ramp 5240 ft --------------- Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Volume, V (vph) 4505 600 Ramp 146 vph Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1224 163 40 v Trucks and buses 5 5 5 0 Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 o Terrain type: Level Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 a 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1..5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 5019 668 0.976 1.00 163 pcph _Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas_ - L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.604 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3295 pc/h 12 R F R FD v = v = 0.488 Fi F v = v - v FO F R v S = 56.3 R mph __Capacity Checks____ Actual Maximum LOS F? 5019 7200 No 4351 7200 LIM v or v 1724 pc/h 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3295 12A La 2000 No (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) No No (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) ----------------- Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_ Actual Max Desirable violation? v 3295 4400 No 12 1 of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.9 pe/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp --freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.488 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.3 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 74.0 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.4 mph HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: verge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Runzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free -Flow speed on ramp volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent ramp Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp Data (EW) Diverge 3 70.0 mph 4328 vph Off Ramp Data Right 1 35.0 mph 930 vph 740 ft ft Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 158 Downstream On 5240 vph ft Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Junction Components Freeway Ramp Volume, V (vph) 4328 930 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1176 253 Trucks and buses 5 5 Recreational vehicles 0 0 Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Length 0.00 mi 0.00 Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 158 0.92 43 5 0 Level 0.00 mi 0.00 mi. 1.5 1.2 vph v Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 Actual 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 12 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4822 1036 Determination (if. not F) 176 pcph D = 4.252 + Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway ------------------------ junction areas of influence C L = Speed (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 0.592 Using Equation 9 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 3277 pc/h 12 R F R FD _________Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? V = v 4822 7200 No Fi F V = v - v 3786 7200 No FO F R v 1036 2000 No R v or v 1545 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 3277 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A __________________ _ Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area.......... Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 3277 4400 No 12 Level of Service Determination (if. not F) Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 25.8 R 12 D Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence C Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, Space mean speed in ramp influence area Space mean speed in outer lanes, Space mean speed for all vehicles, D = 0.52. S S = 55.4 mph R S = 74.7 mph 0 S _ 60.4 mph pc/mi/In Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4603 1515 191 pcph ______________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 736.31 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2962 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6318 7200 No FO v or v 1841 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2962 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A __ Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 4477 4600 No 12A Level of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 30.9 R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.566 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.1 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.2 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.0 mph pc/mi/in HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.65 Phone: Fax: E-mail: ge Analysis Analyst: BC Agency/Co.: Kunzman Associates, Inc. Date performed: 3/24/2015 Analysis time period: Evening Peak Hour Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-15 Freeway Junction: Central Avenue Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore Analysis Year: Existing + Amb + Proj + Cum Description: Central Avenue (NS) at I-15 Freeway EB Ramps Type of analysis Number of lanes in freeway Free-flow speed on freeway Volume on freeway Side of freeway Number of lanes in ramp Free-flow speed on ramp Volume on ramp Length of first accel/decel lane Length of second accel/decel lane Does adjacent ramp exist? Volume on adjacent Ramp Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp Freeway Dat Merge 3 '10.0 4141 On Ramp Dat Right 1 35.0 144.5 1400 Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists) Yes 185 Downstream Off 3820 Conversion to pc/h Under Base Condit Junction Components Freeway Volume, V (vph) 4141 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Peak 15 -min volume, v15 1125 Trucks and buses 5 Recreational vehicles 0 Terrain type: Level Grade Length Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 (EW) mph vph mph vph ft ft vph ft Ramp 1445 0.92 393 5 0 Level mi mi 1.5 1.2 Adjacent Ramp 185 vph 0.92 50 v 5 % 0 Level m.i 1.5 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.976 0.976 0.976 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 4614 1610 206 pcph ___Estimation of V12 Merge Areas L = 794.14 (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 0.617 Using Equation 3 FM v = v (P ) = 2845 pc/h 12 F FM Capacity Checks Actual Maximum LOS F? v 6224 7200 No FO v or v 1769 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 Yes 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2845 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A v 12A __Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? 4455 4600 No 1 of Service Determination (if not F) Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 30.7 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp -freeway junction areas of influence D Speed Estimation Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.559 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 54.4 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = 65.4 mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.1 mph CITY OF inn LADE LSIAOIRE --� �­j DREAM EXTREME, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Honorable Chairperson Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager DATE: April 7, 2015 PROJECT: Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 - An Application to Develop Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 — An Application to Permit Outdoor Storage of Materials and Vehicles within Gated and Fenced -In Areas of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings to be Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way APPLICANT/ Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, P.O. Box 96, Murrieta, CA 92564 OWNER Pasadena Elsinore, LLC, 1712 Deer Creek Lane, St. Louis, MO, 63124 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Adopt Resolution No. 2015- , A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore Regarding the Development of Eight Industrial Buildings Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, and Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- , A Resolution of the Planning Commission of The City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 IDR 2014-01 and CUP 2014-06 April 7, 2015 Page 2 of 5 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) For Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06; and Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-01. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 for the Development of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue And Hunco Way. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- I A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 for the Development of Eight (8) Industrial Buildings within the Existing Pasadena Industrial Park Located at the Northeast and Southeast Corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. Project Location The project site is located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way. It consists of flat, undeveloped property between developed industrial buildings located on Hunco Way and along Pasadena Avenue. Environmental Setting EXISTING LAND GENERAL PLAN ZONING USE Project Vacant LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Site Manufacturing) North Industrial Buildings, LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, Manufacturing), CM Vacant (Commercial Manufacturing) East Industrial Buildings, LI (Limited Industrial), GC M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, (General Commercial) Manufacturing), C-2 Vacant (General Commercial) South Industrial Buildings, M-2 (General M-1 (Limited Commercial Uses, Manufacturing), Floodway Manufacturing) Vacant West Commercial Uses, LI (Limited Industrial) M-1 (Limited Vacant Manufacturing) IDR 2014-01 and CUP 2014-06 April 7, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Background The first phase of development of this Industrial Complex known as Collier Avenue Business Park included Tentative Parcel Map 29325 which subdivided a ten (10) acre parcel into eleven (11) industrial parcels ranging in size from 24,829 square feet to 82,764 square feet. There was an associated Design Review for Industrial Project No. 99-4 that included ten (10) new buildings and one (1) existing building ranging in size from 8,400 square feet to 33,780 square feet. Mitigated Negative Declaration No 99-4 was completed pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These items were approved and adopted by the City Council on September 14, 1999. The Industrial buildings and associated improvements were completed on all of the parcels except for one. The applicant is requesting approval to construct the final building on this one remaining vacant parcel as part of this current entitlement. The second phase of development was a request for approval and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, Tentative Parcel Map No. 29996, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003-09, and Design Review for Industrial Project No. 1-2003-05. These items were approved by City Council on February 10, 2004. Tentative Parcel Map No. 29996 was recorded in November of 2005; however the Design Review and CUP expired on February 10, 2005. A subsequent application for the second phase of development (Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 and Industrial Design Review No. 2007-02) was approved by the City Council on March 25, 2008. These applications also expired. Project Description The applicant is now requesting review and approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 and Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 as described below. Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 (Outdoor Storage) The applicant is requesting approval to allow outdoor storage for this industrial complex. According to the provisions of Section 17.136.040 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (M-1 - Limited Manufacturing), "All outdoor storage shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 17.168 LEMC and shall also be reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening of storage areas. Storage materials shall not be visible from public rights-of-way, including freeways, or adjacent residential or commercial properties." IDR 2014-01 and CUP 2014-06 April 7, 2015 Page 4 of 5 The proposed outdoor storage is consistent with the types of outdoor storage approved in adjacent industrial uses. The conditions of approval provide for appropriate screening of materials within the storage areas. Industrial Design Review No. 2014-01 The applicant is requesting approval to construct seven (7) buildings (Buildings A thru H) on each of the eight (8) parcels within Parcel Map No. 29996 and one building (Building J) on the remaining lot of Parcel Map No. 29325. The buildings range in size from 9,318 square feet (Building E) to 19,475 square feet (Building C -D). Details of each building are listed in the attached plans. Architectural Desiqn The applicant is proposing to use the same style of architecture that was used in the first phase of the development which is a typical industrial contemporary style found in the industrial areas of the City. The design of the proposed buildings are earth tones with glazed glass. Environmental Determination On February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact Analysis and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis ("Reports") prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. constitutes Addendum # 1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. Staff recommends adoption of Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. Prepared By: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager IDR 2014-01 and CUP 2014-06 April 7, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Approved By: Grant Taylor Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Site Plan 6. Full sized Plan set VICINITY MAP INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 P�ROJEC�TSITEI CITY OF A K -ELL S i N 0 kL DREAM EXI UllIL AERIAL MAP INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CITY OF , I AIKL C",,)LSillO}�L F\�.:, Da[n.w FXrrt[na[ RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTING ADDENDUM #1 TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2003-04 FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02, A DEVELOPMENT OF EIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF PASADENA AVENUE AND HUNCO WAY WHEREAS, Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 ("Project") for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way (APN 371-120-040 through 047), with outdoor storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas, and, WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; and WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis ("Reports") were prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. to analyze any changes in traffic impacts caused by the subject Project, that were not previously addressed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; and WHEREAS, the Reports were conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that all potential traffic impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Reports provides some changes and additions to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore constitutes Addendum #1 to adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the Design Review of industrial projects; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-22 recommending that the City Council adopt Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for industrial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, the CEQA documents, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: 1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis, constitute Addendum # 1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. 2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines. 3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration have occurred; specifically: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 5 a. There have not been any substantial changes to the development of the subject property as analyzed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 that require major revisions of the CEQA documents because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, and c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 was adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA; and recommends to the City Council that it make the same finding. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 and Addendum #1 and finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 and Addendum #1 represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003- 04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 28th day of April, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE r SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE J I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 5 OF 5 Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA REGARDING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF PASADENA AVENUE AND HUNCO WAY, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 ("Project") for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way (APN 371-120-040 through 047), with outdoor storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas, and, WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all projects which are proposed on land covered by an MSHCP criteria cell and which require discretionary approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and a Joint Project Review ("JPR") between the City and the Regional Conservation Authority ('RCA") prior to public review of the project applications; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 further requires that development projects not within an MSHCP criteria cell must be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, the Project is discretionary in nature and requires review and approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council; and WHEREAS, the Project is not within an MSHCP Criteria Cell, Core or Linkage, but are within the Elsinore Plan Area of the MSHCP, and therefore, the Project was reviewed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency findings prior to approving any discretionary project entitlements for development of property that is subject to the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to Design Review of industrial projects; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-23 recommending that the City Council adopt findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2014-01 is consistent with the MSHCP; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 of 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for industrial design review applications, and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed application and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to adopt findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the MSHCP, Findings for adoption have been made as follows: 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency Finding before approval. The proposed project includes an industrial design review, and conditional use permit request that require a number of discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the project has been reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with "Other Plan Requirements." These include the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal pool Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, Section 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, Section 6.5.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, Section 4). 2. The proposed project is not subject to the City's LEAP (Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process) and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The proposed project is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell area, therefore, no formal LEAP submittal was required. However, the project is still required to demonstrate compliance with "Other Plan Requirements." The project is in compliance as described further below. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 of 5 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. The project site does not contain areas defined by the MSHCP as riparian/riverine and does not contain vernal pools. Therefore, this section of the MSHCP is not applicable to the project. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The proposed project site is not located within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA) as shown on Figure 6-1 of the MSHCP. Based on its location outside of any NEPSSA or Criteria Area Species Survey Area (CASSA), the proposed project is compliant with MSHCP Section 6.1.3. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in CASSA, Amphibian Species Survey Area with Critical Area, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas with Criteria Area, and Mammal Species Survey Areas with Criteria Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located outside of any CASSA for plants and mammals and no CASSA plant species were observed during the focused surveys for the site. Based upon the above, it can be concluded that the proposed project is consistent with the provisions of the MSHCP. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The proposed project site is separated from nearby criteria cells other properties. Therefore the urban/wildlands interface guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. No vegetation mapping requirements apply to the proposed project. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The proposed project site is separated from nearby criteria cells by other properties. Therefore, the fuels management guidelines set forth in the MSHCP are not applicable. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 of 5 9. The proposed project is conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. 10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further actions related to the MSHCP are required. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby adopts findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 28th day of April, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 5 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EIGHT (8) INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN THE EXISTING PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF PASADENA AVENUE AND HUNCO WAY WHEREAS, Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06 ("Project') for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way (APN 371-120-040 through 047), with outdoor storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas; and, WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines') because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06, and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, and WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis ("Reports") were prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. to analyze any changes in traffic impacts caused by the subject Project, that were not previously addressed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, and WHEREAS, the Reports were conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that all potential traffic impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the industrial design review; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-02 PAGE 2 of 5 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-25 recommending that the City Council approve Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for industrial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed design for the eight (8) industrial buildings and has found it acceptable. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04, the CEQA documents, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis, constitute Addendum # 1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04. 2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-02 PAGE 3 of 5 3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration have occurred. SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.184, the City Council makes the following findings for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02: 1. The project as conditioned will comply with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. The design of the proposed project, is consistent with the approved Limited Industrial land use designation, and therefore, consistent with the General Plan. 2. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.184.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that it will result in the construction of industrial buildings in accordance with appropriate development and design standards contained in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves along any street within the subdivision. The Project also complements the quality of existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually -pleasing design and architecture within the project area. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.184.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The City Council has considered the project and finds that with the attached conditions of approval, the Project complies with the purposes and objectives of the General Plan, and the Municipal Code. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-02 PAGE 4 of 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 28th day of April, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2014-02 PAGE 5 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) GENERAL The proposed project (Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06) consists of the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park (APN 371-120-040 through 047), located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way, with outdoor storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas. 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Tentative Tract No. 36682. 3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project's approval. PLANNING DIVISION 5. Design Review approval for Industrial Design Review No. 2014-02, shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.184.120. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two-year period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review application. Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) 6. Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-06; shall lapse and become void two years following the date on which the conditional use permit became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the conditional use permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.168.080. Subject to the provisions of LEMC Section 17.168.110, a conditional use permit granted pursuant to the provisions of this section shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of the conditional use permit application 7. All Conditions of approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development Department. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building plans, as modified by these conditions of approval. 8a No outdoor storage shall be allowed on Lot 7. (Added by the Planning Commission at its April 7, 2015 hearing.) 9. Any minor revisions to approved site plan or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. Any substantial revisions to the site plan or building elevations shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. 10. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall also be screened, and the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit shall approve screening plan. 11. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) horizontal plane of the fixture. 12. The building addresses (in numerals at least six inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of- way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for each building prior to issuance of building permit. 13. The applicant shall construct the trash enclosures with a decorative roof to match the colors and materials of the proposed project. 14. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 15. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the buildings. 16. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on-site, a Uniform Sign Program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. 17. No individual signs are approved as part of this approval. The applicant or designee shall submit an application for a sign permit, pay appropriate fees and receive approval from the Community Development Department for any sign(s) installed at the project site. All signage shall be in conformance with the approved Uniform Sign Program. 18. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 19. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with appropriate fees, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of a building permit. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. C) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36") Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) d) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. e) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. f) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. g) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign -off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. h) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. i) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. j) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. k) No grass turf landscaping will be installed. 1) All landscaping and irrigation shall comply with the water -efficient landscaping requirements set forth in LEMC Chapter 19.08 (Water Efficient Landscape Requirements), as adopted and any amendments thereto. 20. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 21. The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees, including but not limited to Development Impact Fees (DIF), at the rate in effect at the time of payment. 22. The proposed location of on-site construction trailers shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 23. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 24. The developer shall comply with all Municipal Code provisions regarding construction debris removal and recycling as set forth in Chapter 14.12 (Construction and Demolition Waste Management) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 25. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 26. All perimeter fencing shall be a minimum six foot decorative block wall. 27. Outdoor storage areas shall be enclosed on all sides as follows: • Where visible from Pasadena Avenue or Hunco Way, with a screen a minimum of six feet in height as measured from the highest grade elevation either side of the screen. The screen shall be decorative, solid masonry wall. Gates shall be six feet opaque material. • Where storage areas are not visible from Pasadena Avenue or Hunco Way, wrought iron with landscaping shall be permitted as a screen. The screen shall be a minimum of six feet in height as measured from the highest grade elevation either side of the screen 28. No material stored in outdoor storage areas shall be stored higher than approved screening. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION 29. Any and all existing or proposed public areas shall be made accessible in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 30. Any and all improvements shall be in compliance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC). Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) 31. All department approvals and all fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. ENGINEERING DIVISION General 32. All underlying Conditions of Approval of Parcel Map 29996 shall be met. 33. All slopes and landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by the property owner or property owner's association or another maintenance entity approved by the City Council. 34. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the developer shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 35. Developer shall mitigate to prevent any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and or diversion of drainage. 36. Any grading that affects "waters of the United States", wetlands or jurisdictional streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from respective Federal and/or State agencies. 37. The developer shall provide a copy of an encroachment permit or any approval documents from the Riverside County Flood Control for encroaching, grading, or discharging into County flood control facilities. 38. All required soils, geology, hydrology and hydraulic, and seismic reports shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. Fees 39. The developer shall pay all Engineering Division assessed, Development Impact Fees, Plan Check and Permit fees (LEMC 16.34). Applicable Development Impact Fees may include: Stephens Kangaroo Habitat Fee (K -Rat), Traffic Infrastructure Fee (TIF), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), In -Lieu of Construction and Area Drainage Fee. Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) 40. Mitigation Fees will be assessed at the prevalent rate at time of payment in full. 41. In -Lieu of Construction fees based on the cost of final asphalt cap to the original Hunco Way street, as allowed by the City Council, will be assessed. Flood Plain 42. Project lies within a FEMA mapped special flood hazard zone. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations to include elevation of the lowest floor a minimum of 2 feet above the base flood elevation in FEMA mapped special flood hazard areas (100year). Any fill placed in the 100 - year flood plain for the purposes of elevating the building floor out of the flood plain shall require a CLOMR/CLOMR-F and LOMR/LOMR-F to be processed with FEMA. Storm Water Management/Pollution Prevention/NPDES Design 43. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: • General Permit -Construction • General Permit - Industrial • Scrap Metal • Deminimus Discharges • MS4 44. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority): (Section XII.E.2, XII.E.3,and XII.E.7) • Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g., preservation of natural features to a level consistent with the MEP standard, minimization of Urban Runoff through clustering, reducing impervious areas, etc.) • The Project shall 'Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire and/or bio -treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio- treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. • Any portion of [the DCV] that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapotranspired, and/or biotreated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 45. The project shall implement LID practices that treat the 85th percentile storm. 46. Parking lot landscaping shall be designed to provide for treatment, retention or infiltration of runoff. 47. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 48. Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern — The project shall identify potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; conserve natural areas; protect slopes, channels and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff. 49. CEQA — If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division. 50. The project shall use either volume -based and/or flow -based criteria for sizing BMPs in accordance with NPDES Permit Provision XII.D.4. Construction 51. Both a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction are required for this project. 52. SWPPP - A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site, updated as necessary and be available for review upon request. Projects that are not subject to coverage under the General Permit — Construction will prepare and implement an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in compliance with the California Building Code and Local Ordinances. 53. Prior to grading or building permit the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) . the letter of notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 54. Erosion & Sediment Control - Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES Program and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil, aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be property covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways. A copy of the plan shall be incorporated into the SWPPP as applicable, kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site and available for review upon request. Post Construction 55. A. preliminary WQMP shall be submitted during the project entitlement stage. The level of detail in a preliminary Project -Specific WQMP will depend upon the level of detail known about the overall project design at the time project approval is sought. At a minimum, the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP shall identify the type, size, location, and final ownership of Stormwater BMPs adequate to serve new roadways and any common areas, and to also manage runoff from an expected reasonable estimate of the square footage of future roofs, driveways, and other impervious surfaces on each individual lot 56. The applicant shall use the Water Quality Management Plan for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County guidance document and template for preparation of both the preliminary and final WQMP. 57. The project shall complete and submit for review and approval to the Engineering Division a final WQMP, incorporating the LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs committed to in the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP. The final WQMP shall be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 58. WQMP — The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used onsite to control identified pollutants of concern. The applicant shall utilize the MS4 Permittee Drainage Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) Area Management Plan (DAMP), Model WQMP, and LID Guidance Manual for reference, and the MS4 Permittee's WQMP template for submittal. This WQMP shall include the following: Detailed site and project description • Potential stormwater pollutants • Post -development drainage characteristics • Low Impact Development (LID) BMP selection and analysis • Structural and Non -Structural source control BMPs • Site design and drainage plan (BMP Exhibit) • Vector issues are addressed in the BMP design, operation and maintenance. • GIS coordinates for all LID and Treatment Control BMPs • HCOC - demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration and volume for the post construction condition from a 2 year and 10 year 24 hour rainfall event will not cause significant adverse impacts on downstream erosion and receiving waters, or measures are implemented to mitigate significant adverse impacts to downstream public facilities and water bodies. Design goal to replicate pre - development hydrologic regime. 59. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan that (1) describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit; (2) identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; and (3) describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs 60. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked "Only Rain in the Storm Drain" using the City authorized marker to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system. 61. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: • Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) described in the BMP Exhibit from the project's approved WQMP have been implemented, constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) • Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural BMPs described in the project's WQMP. • Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that the structural BMP's identified in the project's WQMP are installed and operational. • Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. • Demonstrate that copies of the project's approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan attached) are available for each of the initial occupants (commercial/industrial) or HOA as appropriate. • Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the engineer of work dated 12 months after C of O will be considered in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. • Provide a recorded copy of one of the following: 1. CC&R's (they must include the approved WQMP and O&M Plan) for the project's Owner's Association. 2. A water quality implementation agreement has the approved WQMP and O&M Plan attached; or 3. The final approved Water Quality Management Plan and Operations and Maintenance Plan. 62. Industrial Facilities - For industrial facilities subject to California's General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity as defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. • Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the NPDES Coordinator. Utilities 63. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 64. All overhead utilities shall be undergrounded in accordance with Chapter 12.16 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) 65. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 66. The developer shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL). 67. The developer shall submit a copy of the "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Improvements Design 68. The development of each Planning Area or Phase shall be subject for specific review by the City Engineer and conditions of approval. 69. Sight distance into and out of the project location shall comply with Caltrans Standards. 70. Prior to issuance of a building permit for development, written verification from Caltrans that the project's Traffic Impact Analysis is approved must be received by the City and the applicant shall pay the required TUMF and City Traffic Impact Fees as mitigation for the project's fair share contribution of the cost to construct a northbound right turn lane on Central Avenue at the 1-15 Eastbound ramps, as identified in the Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis prepared Kunzman and Associates dated March 26, 2015,; said right turn lane shall extend to the Collier Avenue intersection and comply with Caltrans design standards. 71. The developer shall install a permanent Center Line monument per City of Lake Elsinore Standard 601 D at the intersection of Hunco Way and Pasadena Street. Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) 72. The developer shall install blue dot markers in the roadway at a right angle to Fire Hydrant locations per Lake Elsinore Standards. 73. The developer shall install public street lighting at locations to be approved by the City Engineer, and shown on the Street Improvement plan. 74. The developer shall coordinate with Riverside Transit Authority for location and installation of bus transit facilities. 75. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 76. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 77. A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed off-site and onsite drainage facilities, and include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff from a 10 -yr storm of 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed condition is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same storm frequency. Both 6 hour and 24hour storm duration shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. 78. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All off-site drainage, if different from historic flow, shall be conveyed to a public facility. 79. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 80. The site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water from entering buildings (California Green Building Standards Code 4.106.3). 81. All existing storm drain inlet facilities adjacent to the subject properties shall be retrofitted with a storm drain filter, all new storm drain inlet facilities constructed Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) by this project shall include a storm drain filter. 82. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Lake Elsinore Public Works Standard Plans. 83. The developer shall construct half width street improvements on Pasadena Street such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to General Plan and Secondary Highway right-of-way cross sections. 84. The developer shall construct full street improvements on Hunco Way such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to Collector Highway right-of-way cross sections. 85. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and the plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, ac pavement, street lighting, painted median, and drainage improvements. 86. The developer shall provide signing and striping plans for the required improvements of this project. 87. If existing improvements are to be modified, the existing improvement plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. Permitting/Construction 88. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City and/or State right-of-way. The developer shall submit the permit application, required fees and executed agreements, security and other required documentation prior to issuance. 89. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 90. All streets shall be constructed per Lake Elsinore City Standards and/or applicable specific plan. Any deviation from City standards shall be approved by the City Engineer. Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) GRADING Design: 91. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for City review and approval for all addition and/or movement of soil (grading) on the site. The plan shall include separate sheets for erosion control, haul route and traffic control. The grading submittal shall include all supporting documentation and be prepared using City standard title block, standard drawings and design manual (available at www.lake-elsinore.org) . 92. All grading plan contours shall extend to minimum of 50 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. 93. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance. 94. If the grading plan identifies alterations in the existing drainage patterns as they exit the site, a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for review and approval by City Engineer shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits. All grading that modifies the existing flow patterns and/or topography shall be approved by the City Engineer. 95. A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults, liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the absence of this hazard. 96. The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and the applicant shall accept drainage from the adjacent property owners. Perm it/Construction: 97. Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 98. A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity. Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) 99. Developer shall provide the city with a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) letter issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program 100. Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in excess of 5,000 cy shall be approved by City Council. (LEMC 15.72.065) 101. Export sites located within the Lake Elsinore City limits must have an active grading permit. 102. Applicant to provide to the City a video record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 103. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. Slopes steeper than 2 to 1 shall be evaluated for stability and proper erosion control and approved by the City. 104. Review of the project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and sediment and erosion control plan shall be completed. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. 105. Approval of the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction shall be received prior to issuance of a grading permit. 106. Submit an approved environmental clearance document to the Engineering Division. This approval shall identify and clear all proposed grading activity anticipated for this project. 107. Developer shall pay all grading permit applicable processing, permit, security and development fees including those fees identified in an applicable development agreement, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat. Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 108. Provide final soils, geology and seismic report, including recommendations for parameters for seismic design of buildings, and walls prior to building permit. 109. Approval of a conditional letter of map amendment (CLOMA) or conditional letter of map revision based on fill (CLOMR-F) must be received from FEMA. 110. Prior to issuance of certificates of use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, uses shall be identified and, for specified uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate or handle hazardous materials in quantities that will require permitting and inspection once operational), the developer shall propose plans and measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) to the satisfaction of the City Building Official(s). 111. All street improvement plans, traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans shall be completed and approved by the City Engineer per the Traffic Impact Analysis as specified. 112. The developer shall pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Prior to Occupancy 113. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required improvements of this development shall be installed. 114. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 115. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 116. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided. 117. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time of Planning Commission Approved Page 17 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) payment in full in accordance with the LEMC. 118. As -built plans for all approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. The developer/developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. 119. In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 120. All final studies and reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2 x 11" mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD. Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading, SWPPP, WQMP, etc. 121. All plan sets and recorded maps shall be digitized and provided on CD/DVD as follows: • Final Map(s) - GIS Shape files* and .tif of recorded map. • Improvement Plans — GIS Shape files* and Jif of approved as built mylar. • Grading Plans - .tif of approved as built mylar. • *GIS Shape files must be in projected Coordinate System: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. 122. Developer shall provide approved LOMA or LOMR-F and FEMA elevation certificates for all buildings (includes trailers and storage facilities) prior to final approvals. The letter of determination and certification may be in the form of a letter signed and sealed by a licensed civil engineer. 123. Final soil report showing compliance with recommendations, compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2 x 11" mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on CD to the Engineering Division before final inspection will be scheduled. 124. All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, dedications and vacations and easement agreement(s) not processed on the final map for ingress and egress through adjacent property(ies) shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 125. All signing and striping and traffic control devices onsite and on Pasadena Street Planning Commission Approved Page 18 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) and Hunco Way shall be installed. 126. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District Requirements. 127. In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 128. Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use or a certificate of occupancy, developer shall: • Demonstrate that all structural BMPs have been constructed, installed and are functioning in conformance with approved plans and specifications and the WQMP; • Demonstrate that they are prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the conditions of approval or building/grading permit conditions; • Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved project specific WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants; and • The developer shall provide all education guidelines for Water Quality Management Practices to the tenants, operators and owners of the businesses of the development, regarding the environmental awareness on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the approved WQMP in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Contact the City NPDES Coordinator for handout/guideline information. 129. Chemical management plans shall be approved by the County/City and other appropriate agencies such as County/City Fire Department, the Health Services Agency's Department of Environmental Health, and sewering and/or water agencies to ensure implementation of each agency's respective requirements. Approval by the appropriate agencies shall be furnished to the Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of any certificates of use and/or occupancy. 130. Certificates or permits may be ministerially withheld if features needed to properly manage chemicals cannot be incorporated into a previously completed building, center, or complex. 131. The property owner (aka Legally Responsible Party) shall execute and cause to Planning Commission Approved Page 19 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) be recorded a "Covenant and Agreement" in the form provided by the City to inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved final project -specific WQMP. 132. Developer shall pay all outstanding applicable processing and development fees including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat and area drainage prior to occupancy/final approval. FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING OFFICE General Conditions 133, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Office Responsibility- It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward them to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Division at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. The following fire department conditions shall be implemented in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the adopted codes at the time of project building plan submittal, these conditions are in addition to the adopted code requirements. 134. Blue Dot Reflectors- Blue retro -reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Dept. 135. Minimum Hydrant Fire Flow- Minimum required fire flow shall be 2,500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 136. Hydrant System- A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2" x 2.") will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 250 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant (s) in the system Average spacing between hydrants 450' and 225' maximum distance from any point on the street or road frontage to hydrant. 137. Secondary Access- In the interest of Public Safety, this project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access. Said access shall be constructed in accordance to Planning Commission Approved Page 20 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department standards to accommodate full fire response and community evacuation. 138. Automatic / Manual Gates- Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the traffic lane (s) serving that gate and no less than 20 feet wide. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet from the roadway and shall open to allow vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40 foot turning radius shall be used. Gate access shall be equipped with a rapid entry system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic/manual gate pins shall be rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30 foot pounds. Automatic gates shall be equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Contact the Fire Planning office for current plan check fees. 139. Separation of Occupancy- A fire barrier wall for the separation of occupancies is required per the California Building Code. Fire walls, fire barriers, fire partitions, smoke barriers, and smoke partitions or any other wall required to have protected openings or penetrations shall be effectively and permanently identified with signs or stenciling. Such identification shall be located in accessible concealed floor, floor ceiling or attic spaces repeated at intervals not exceeding 30 feet along the wall, and include lettering not less than .5 inch in height, incorporating the suggested wording "FIRE AND/OR SMOKE BARRIER—PROTECT ALL OPENINGS," or other wording. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 140. Plan Check Fee- Building plan check fee made payable to The City Lake Elsinore, and shall be submitted to the Fire Department at time plans are submitted to our office(s). 141. Water System Plans- Applicant and/or developer shall separately submit 2 sets of water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Department review and approval. Mylars will be signed by the Fire Department after review and approval. Two (2) copies of the signed and approved water plans shall be returned to the Fire Department before release of a building permit. Planning Commission Approved Page 21 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) Prior to Buildina Final Inspection 142. Fire Sprinkler System 13- Install a complete fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Building Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. Sprinkler systems with pipe sizes larger than 4 inches in diameter will require the Engineer or Architect of Record certification with details and calculations with "wet signature" that the building structural system is designed to support the seismic and gravity loads for the support of the additional weight of the sprinkler system. The PIV and FDC shall be located to the front of the building in an approved location, unobstructed and within 50 feet of an approved road or driveway, within 200 feet of a hydrant. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 143. Sprinkler System Monitoring- Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler system(s) with 20 or more heads. Valve monitoring, water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station in accordance with California Building Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm shall be provided on the exterior in an approved location. The location of the Fire Alarm Control Unit shall be located in an environmentally controlled location in accordance with 10.14 (NFPA 72, 2013), A C-10 licensed contractor must submit plans designed in accordance with adopted standards, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 144. Designated Fire Lanes- The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. 145.. Knox Rapid Entry Box- A rapid entry Knox Box shall be installed on the outside of the building. Key(s) shall have durable and legible tags affixed for identification of the correlating tenant space. Special forms are available from this office for ordering the Knox Box. If the building/facility is protected with a fire alarm or burglar alarm system, it is recommended that the lock box be "tamper" monitoring. 146. Fire Extinguishers — Minimum Install portable fire extinguishers complying with Section 906 of the 2013 California Fire Code with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounted 48" (inches) to center above floor level with maximum 4" Planning Commission Approved Page 22 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-06 (PASADENA INDUSTRIAL PARK) projection from the wall. Contact Fire Dept. for proper placement of equipment prior to installation. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) 147. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process, as applicable. The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project in lieu of creating/annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124. Planning Commission Approved Page 23 of 23 City Council April 7, 2015 April 28, 2015 wr Uru � �1 ,`t360NISl3 3W� ;, Q < MVC] JHIN1snONI VN30HSHd rCD (Di - eaoNis�aaa�n A�; �j Q �a >Q2 Vd WHIsh(INI VN30VSVd 0 - w \ o I is 3bON16l33NVl � �� '�� �< >NVd ]VlHisnONl VNd4VSVd �� Lij Nbld 2i00-d 8'8 H SM(nno N Cn 11?JHd IHI2J1Sf1aNl HN34t SVd I o60_ 4_ n V m ¢ L z 1 � o m I � A a mig v LU= NVId bOOId Cl 8 O ONIallfl8 w � or� � ]NONISl��4Vt �F � j M �iHvd wiIjisnONI VN34VSVd w � LLI -ld'dOOTJ - D SNIMin NV 9 0 Ni Jvd �Vl2j1sn(]Nl VNzICIVSVCJ ci J NV�d b001d Ur r O -d ONIMin8Lo 0 Q Q s = : 3210NIM33AV9 OF Ji21Hd lt/Ri1SflaNl HN3Ovsvd LLJ° NV-Id bOOld - H JNI4llf18 � (.0 OF 1ibVd iviHisn(INI VNAGVSVd ,L i i i ,rviwm i �I IJ I �V1,OL 1. Pa (V H SNio-iin8 � 0� ( ) mvd �HIb1S(l4Nl HN30HSHd I r�i�•ici��ri,ii�r r Cis-i C) I C? r-: i 77 LJ ,I k 5. 1 �p SJiM �bt1d �VI2�1flONI HN30HSHd .:. ................_..__ . Ec� c U n 'C sU aicu.,l3 �Ntlle,cu� "him, f a c &}k Ry n nnzxx xs S S y � -0 I - H.11 O [fl?IJJ a d ? € €Fpit E Y his t huGl I w i ik `So ESP e�; S ,I �� r, Cid' s m i a too it ' oil , I ait VIP r I 'V 1 r' s t ira Ian., i f 11 , r s f I v I l' Lu LL Hvd wlRjisnCINI VNEI(IVSVd I 7 L z z 7, o el "u o it ii� it CD It ki it III lit I it 13 1 I" ,q 3 01.9 S318vi, 5i it 3,t, eo LIJ L? D�ONISIA 1�1 _JVJ�ji 0 N�]Vd snGNI VN 3OVSVd -11 7 I II Zo UC IIII Z zi 0 0 > zi U -------o Z, II < ❑ I � O a h < u: :� I b G 3 \\\ :i » © a: » :» » qL » /� \\�\ I e7= ƒ1 ik%Y Ff.4�ib Y)i>Ldi>. tiff 32iONISU 3hVl )oAvd l�/I�I1Sfl4Nl HN3a�JS�ld r- r ik%Y Ff.4�ib Y)i>Ldi>. tiff ,1l ft kill'_ Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 4) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-547 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2095 CITY OF^ LADELSII`IORE LXIRLM[ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN PROSTAFF LLC AND THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of Ninety Five Thousand Dollars and no cents ($95,000.00) between ProStaff LLC and the City of Lake Elsinore for project consultant services on the Rosetta Canyon Park Phase II Project, Background On March 24, 2015 the City authorized the approval of a professional services agreement with STK Inc. (architectural services) to complete the design and construction documents phase of the Rosetta Canyon Park Phase II project. ProStaff LLC has been working with City Staff to streamline the project timeline and to identify cost saving opportunities from the project inception. In fact, ProStaff LLC has negotiated over $230,000 in savings from professional services needed during the preliminary design phase of the project. Discussion ProStaff is a municipal consulting firm serving public agencies solely in the State of California and ProStaff will be working closely with City staff through all project phases with an emphases on the upfront contractual negotiation. ProStaff will bring to the project extensive Capital Improvement Project experience that exceeds city staff capacity. This experience extends the range of complete spectrum of circulation, infrastructure and public facility projects for municipalities. A major consideration and effort will be placed on the cost estimating and cost containment of the project during the design and construction phases. ProStaff LLC Professional Services Agreement April 28, 2015 Page 2 Additionally, just as ProStaff has already utilized local City of Lake Elsinore professional services at impressive savings to the project, they will continue to seek material and services from local businesses for many other project requirements. ProStaff will analyze cost saving opportunities for the City such as building the project as an owner builder with consideration for the utilization of construction management services and other specific areas of expertise from local City of Lake Elsinore talent. It is estimated that this approach potentially may reduce project costs by as much as 20%. Ongoing operational and maintenance cost are a major consideration when building such a project. ProStaff will seek opportunities to utilize alternative energy sources such as solar energy, which has multiple direct benefits including reduced electrical power costs and when incorporated into the design concept may provide shaded parking areas and building structure cooling options which will help to reduce heat generation. FISCAL IMPACT The professional services of $95,000 has been budgeted in the Rosetta Canyon Park project for project management services and available in the FY 14/15 CIP administration budget. Prepared by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Professional Services Agreement dated March 31, 2015, (PDF) First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND PROSTAFF LLC ROSSETTA CANYON SPORTS FIELD AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made and entered into as of April 28, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and ProStaff LLC. ("Consultant'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On March 31, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Professional Services" (the "Original Agreement'). 2. Section 3. Compensation of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The compensation to the agreement shall be increased by Ninety-five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($95,000). The total compensation will equal One Hundred Twenty- five Thousand, and No Cents ($125,000). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" "CONSULTANT" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal ProStaff LLC corporation Grant Yates, City Manager Gus Papagolos, Owner ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL Pre Design Preparation of Site Survey and plotting existing Utilities, consisting of an Aerial and supplemental field topographic survey at 1 inch = 20 foot scale and 1- foot contour intervals, field survey consisting of obtaining existing elevations of field area as a grid to verify aerial survey elevations and picking up field elevations of existing curbs and sidewalks on Ardenwood Way for the proposed driveways, obtaining horizontal and vertical location of existing surface features, and obtaining horizontal and vertical location of tie-in points to existing improvements. Mapping shall meet National Map Accuracy Standards. Plotting of existing site utilities based on City provided record drawings to identify and locate existing water and sewer lines, power, and communication facilities. Task 101: Design Development Preliminary Civil Engineering Services for On-site Grading and Drainage, we will conduct an analysis of site grading, so that the perimeter conditions for all site access points, site drainage, and water quality management create a seamless transition. Analysis to include parking and circulation, utilities and maintenance. We will prepare preliminary grading and drainage plan for proposed athletic fields, concession/restroom/cell tower, parking area garden site, Dog Park and associated facilities. This will include athletic field grades, building pad elevations, design of access, grades on flatwork, surface drainage layout, and preliminary support calculations. Earthwork calculations will be based on preliminary grades. Preliminary Utility Design, we will prepare preliminary site piping for fire service, domestic water, and irrigation systems. Domestic services will be designated between the public water system and the point of connection at concession/restroom building face. Irrigation service from the reclaimed water source or existing service will be confirmed by landscape design. Meter size for both domestic and irrigation shall be provided by mechanical and landscape architect. Grading and Construction Cost Estimate, we will provide construction cost estimate based on preliminary grading, drainage, utility plans, and the proposed water quality requirements. Coordination and Meeting, we will attend meetings with utility service providers and architect, and coordinate design activities throughout design development phase with architect and City. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND PROSTAFF LLC ROSSETTA CANYON SPORTS FIELD This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of March 31, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and ProStaff LLC. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: Rosetta Canyon Park sport fields design concept with parking and concession area. B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. kV C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. ProStaff Professional Services Agmt 2015.docx Page 1 C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance project completion and the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Scope of Work (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's initial compensation is Thirty Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($30,000.00) ($95 per hour and not to exceed 25 hours per week without City approval). Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including Page 2 any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant, Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. Page 3 d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and Page 4 shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Page 5 Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. ill. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers Page 6 vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: ProStaff LLC Attn: Gus Papagolos 37635 Via Majorca Murrieta , CA 92562 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments, This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting, The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully Page 7 responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20, Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21, Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ('Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation ------- Grant Ya City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney "CONSULTANT" ProStaff LLC Gus Papagolos, Project Consultant Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Initial Proposal Page 10 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL Design Development; evaluate professional services during the design phase and assess and negotiate professional service agreements i.e., civil engineering, geotechnical services, structural engineering, plumbing/mechanical/electrical engineering, Evaluate and Negotiate Construction Cost During Procurement & Selection Process; develop requests for proposal for all contract construction trades and administrate the scope of work as directed by the City Staff. Negotiate construction bids and seek local contractor talent, construction material suppliers in support of the project. Design Management and Project Controls; establish and coordinate with City staff timelines, construction schedules for all construction phases through project competition. Track and explain project expenses in relationship to budget targets. Seek process efficiencies and complete project transparency between all City departments. Coordination and Meeting; we will attend meetings with utility service providers and architect, and coordinate design activities throughout design development phase with architect and City. Coordinate construction management of all phases of the project through completion. Operational Cost Development; develop operational cost schedules for post construction project operations to include operational cost reduction implementation of alternative energy sources, electronic security, and irrigation conservation. Develop Revenue Opportunity Plan; develop facility concession plan of operation and revenue projection based on various operational concepts. Develop sport world marketing plan for maximum facility exposure, utilization, with programed maintenance schedule considerations. Focused interest on site and destination competitive tournament play for weekend and special sporting events. Fee: $30,000 ($95 per hour and not to exceed 25 hours per week without City approval) City of Lake Elsinore 130 Saith Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w Jake-elsinore.org Text File File Number: ID# 14-548 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 5) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 CITY OF `ft LADE LSINOR E '-V' DIUAM EXTREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE ANNUAL CPI ADJUSTMENT Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the rate adjustment notification from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority as a result of their action taken on March 2, 2015. Background The MSHCP calls for an annual CPI adjustment to local development mitigation fees collected to fund the implementation of the Plan. Fee ordinances adopted by the County and Cities reflect this requirement. Each year, the RCA staff informs the County and Cities of the CPI adjustment and whether or not the Board approved the adjustment. Based on the CPI increase from December 2013 to December 2014, MSHCP fees would increase 0.726% effective July 1, 2015. The attached spreadsheet shows the current fees and the fees effective July 1, 2015 if the RCA Board approves implementing the increase. The RCA Board elected not to adjust the fees for the last six fiscal years. The cumulative CPI increases not implemented amount to 8.54% from Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2015. The current rates were implemented effective July 1, 2008, for Fiscal Year 2009. If approved, staff estimates the rate increase would generate approximately $71,000 in additional development mitigation fees to the RCA for the Fiscal Year 2016. The estimate is based on $9.8 million in potential development mitigation fees for the year. RCA Staff discussed the proposed fee increase with Bill Blankenship, Executive Officer of the Building Industry Association Riverside County Chapter. While the Building Industry Association does not welcome any fee increases, they did not oppose this increase. RCA MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee Annual CPI Adjustment April 28, 2015 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT While the fiscal impact directly to the City of Lake Elsinore is unknown, RCA staff estimate the rate increase would generate $71,000 in additional development mitigation fees to the RCA for the Fiscal Year 2016. Prepared by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: March 2, 2015 RCA Staff report Letter to City of Lake Elsinore I(Lonservation Authority Wcsi,;m Rivenitiv Go„nty Boma) ni Diw"I)Ib Cheinnon )nhn l., t�iylinnc V'i,r lhenman liugoue IYlomanvi ra:11 i,„I n�hl,a CnIII Iit el Kh,, sidr J4wiu i,.hil (`iIt! a%,A4n 1 130» 6rnnil rilg aj1a91dmu,rr UIIII Ii. it C`,u+,hl u(Piraavidr '1'i m l;i onn (-ilun immmn h-0arYanu I:dwa rd� i'ily nj '1'naerrtla jc flre)'71a,ei t! lily nj Cnlinn�:n 6cnin Llilr'ms ri5°rI i, It U. ISI Donna Jumhon Ji t/ of A1"I m Yell; v iV:,laslill iohnaon Cfl{, aJhiCt 1'Isiunr �.i I I it I KI III I Vcrl„• La1 n'i vcn N4uti Liosaivcvcr rilq.,� Atrrij?; I'Hy lo?f, Chir V it i1 1, 1. �Itt I II G.+n�r AI,Ir. iviark t )rcn'n 1 Cilli nl Rrn!mumf I lao4 12amo=. C'h url: ;Ynshiny Lvl Cbunh „I 1{:v. nidi tisoatG,•n ,t.,i1 II:,II,,, I_ln h [Itieo Du,rtor :;dln7n tin,,I,'cdh•=zn ILrorsltlo.I bl"I'ni.1'I? All I,I),Iln, Il , iti..oi:+1J,y {',l It III n i. i'I ISlti' I/”, r,Ir r:'..vo r: a.urr March 17, 2015 Grant Yates, City Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 ........... _.. RE: RCA BOARD ACTION TO APPROVE IMPLEMENTING THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 Dear Mr. Yates: The MSHCP calls for an annual CPI adjustment to local development mitigation fees collected to fund the implementation of the Plan. Fee ordinances adopted by the County and Cities reflect this requirement. Based on the GPI increase from December 2013 to December 2014, MSHCP fees will increase 0.726% effective July 1, 2015. On March 2, 2015, the RCA Board of Directors took action to approve implementing the GPI adjustment for Fiscal Year 2015-16 and directed RCA staff to inform the County and Cities of this action. RCA recommends that member agencies adopt the new fees for the Fiscal Year 2015-16 rates as outlined in the attached. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at (951) 955-9700. Sincerely, Honey Bernas Director of Administrative Services Attachment cc: Natasha Johnson, RCA Board Member Grant Taylor, Community Development Director Nancy Lassey, Finance Manager nservation Wastoln Rlversidc <ouoly Itno-rd of Uim<un'e timh;rrd¢ xern; Ismh lien Ctn.>h john ji,'I" l ita, van,l I.dw<t J is 0" ;,,,,;0 14,IiIt ;Ili irhw „auntNil Ili" }, (a IMOO icm�sw: C'iiu al -`!'qi :-buticn 3'n?asha lo6rson i ;»da Kl'y:, u ,« l.hit, ;AI;O,OiC e.l I " o, i ("'le , I, 11:61 �:It in , x y Fee Category Residential, density less than 8.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) Residential density between 8.0 and 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) Residential density greater than 14.0 dwelling Units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) Commercial (fee per acre) Industrial (fee per acre) M $ 1,952 $ 1,250 $ 1,015 $ 6,645 $ 6,645 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE (LDMF) ANNUAL CPI ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT March 2, 2015 Agenda Item No. 11 Staff Contact: Background: Regional Conservation Authority Honey Bernas Director of Administrative Services (951)955-9700 The MSHCP calls for an annual CPI adjustment to local development mitigation fees collected to fund the implementation of the Plan. Fee ordinances adopted by the County and Cities reflect this requirement. Each year, the RCA staff informs the County and Cities of the CPI adjustment and whether or not the Board approved the adjustment. Based on the CPI increase from December 2013 to December 2014, MSHCP fees would increase 0.726% effective July 1, 2015. The attached spreadsheet shows the current fees and the fees effective July 1, 2015 if the RCA Board approves implementing the increase. The RCA Board elected not to adjust the fees for the last six fiscal years. The cumulative CPI increases not implemented amount to 8.54% from Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2015. The current rates were implemented effective July 1, 2008, for Fiscal Year 2009. If approved, staff estimates the rate increase would generate approximately $71,000 in additional development mitigation fees to the RCA for the Fiscal Year 2016. The estimate is based on $9.8 million in potential development mitigation fees for the year. Staff discussed the proposed fee increase with Bill Blankenship, Executive Officer of the Building Industry Association Riverside County Chapter. While the Building Industry Association does not welcome any fee increases, they are not opposing this increase. Executive Committee and Staff Recommendations: That the RCA Board of Directors: 1) Approve implementing the CPI adjustment for Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fees effective July 1, 2015, and 2) Direct staff to inform Member Agencies of this action. Attachment: Current, Adjusted, and Proposed MSHCP Development Mitigation Fees AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 ATTACHMENT CURRENT, ADJUSTED, AND PROPOSED WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP LDMF I L 0 N O U d O W W U m ''^^ ❑ J W O Q Z W C o Qwd a u 3 Z a` m J w d ui Q � E Z w .. Q ❑ O U U ,n C O V O W a d U O m 0 a m w° a LL W a° Q do _ N O A @ M v � y N EL � LL r 0 0 0 0 0 d a �" N l(i l�fJ In Ln O U Z LL 0 0 0 0 0 v v L N v v U@ U V V V V V LL Q N N N N N M 2L LL N M M M M M ❑ N N N N N C C C U � 3 CL m m rn w m C G C U U LL 3 3 3 @ @ a a a NN LL m N O t0[1 N 3 i U LL» v> v m LL m N E E O U �r. d 0 Z Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 6) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-549 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 4/23/2015 CITY OF .nc LAKE �:%LSII`IOIZE :; DkGAM rXIREM[ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Elsinore. Recommendation Approve the Professional Services Agreement by and between RJM Design Group and the City of Lake Elsinore for landscape architecture, and engineering services related to schematic design, design development, and construction documents for two (2) parks in substantially the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background On March 30, 2015, the City solicited written proposals from qualified landscape architectural and design firms for conceptual design, design development and delivery of construction documents for two (2) city parks (City Park located at 243 S. Main Street and Yarborough Park located at 419 N. Poe Street). Before the deadline on April 3, 2015, two responses were received from qualified landscape architectural firms detailing design proposals and fees on the City Park and Yarborough Park rehab projects. Both responses meet the requirements of the City's request for proposals and are made by highly respected firms in the industry. Below are the submittal results: Discussion Construction Conceptual Document Firm Design Amount Amount Total Amount RJM $25,300 $53,000 $78,300 RHA Landscape — Planners Inc. $20,090 $59,335 $79,425 Discussion RJM Professional Services Agreement April 28, 2015 Page 2 The final goal of this agreement will be the development of construction documents, which will include a complete set of plans, working drawings and specifications, general/special provisions and other required documents for a complete and approved set of construction documents to perform the needed park rehabilitation at both locations. Also, a landscape architect shall work with the City to evaluate both sites and develop a final landscape design for each. The funding for both parks is provided by an awarded Housing Related Parks Program Grant. The Housing Related Parks Program Grant administered through the California Department of Housing and Community Development awards local governments that approve affordable housing for lower- income households and are in compliance with State Housing Element Law with grant funds to create or rehabilitate parks. As identified in the City's grant application the following amenities will be included: City Park - rehabilitation of park lighting; hardscape (concrete walls, curbs, planters, sidewalk, etc.); construct new picnic area with shelters; amenities to include picnic tables, cafe tables, bar -b -cues, trash receptacles, hot coal bins and drinking fountains, improve the parking lot and ADA improvements. Yarborough Park - construct a water spray pad; seat wall; decorative safety fencing; picnic areas with shelters; amenities to include picnic tables, benches, bar -b -cues, trash receptacles, hot coal bins, drinking fountains and ADA improvements. Fiscal Impact The landscape architecture and engineering services by RJM Design in the amount of $78,300 will be funded in the CIP with Housing Related Parks Program Grant funding through the California Department of Housing and Community Development for Yarborough and City Park improvements. Prepared by: Johnathan O. Skinner Director of Community Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Professional Services Agreement Dated April 16, 2015 (PDF) RJM Proposal AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RJM Design Group, Inc. City Park/Yarborough Park Improvement Projects This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of April 29, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and RJM Design Group, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: conceptual design, design development and delivery of construction documents for two city park improvement projects. B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT RJM APRIL 242015Page 1 C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A). In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $78,300 without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. 5. Reserved. 6. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and Page 2 expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"), Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 8. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. Page 3 d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 11. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring, and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 12. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the Page 4 standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 15. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 16. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with Page 5 the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. Page 6 V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: RJM Design Group 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 19. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 20. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and Page 7 competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 21. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 22. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 23. Controlling Law Venue, This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 24. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 25. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 26. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change, (b) grant extensions of time, (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. Page 8 28. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 30. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 31. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. [Signatures on next page] Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Proposal Exhibit B — List of Subcontractors "CONSULTANT" RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC., a California corporation By: Its: Page 10 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS [ATTACH IF APPLICABLE] EXHIBIT B Appf X10"1 Park Renovation and Improvement RIM Design Group, Inc. has extensive experience in transforming and updating, heavily used neighborhood park facilities into more functional environments that encourage social interaction, promote safety, and are aesthetically pleasing to the community. Fundamental to our approach is a thorough understanding of each park site's existing conditions, character, and contribution to the surrounding neighborhood. We will emphasize design and detailing thatwili provide sustainable, long-term value to the City of Lake Elsinore, Challenges: The challenge is to take outdated, existing park equipment and integrate new amenities, utilizing some existing infraStl'UCtU1V and making smooth transitions between the old and new, while minimizing impact to existing park features. ADA Compliance Universal Access Topography Drainage Existing Vegetation Existing Site Hements (gazebo, restroom, picnic areas) Implementing Sustainable Practices Incorporating Splash play within existing park facilities Solutions: Conducton-site visit to inventory and evainate existing amenities Work with City staff to identify park uses, problem areas, elements to be repaired, removed, replaced, or to remain. Develop plans that address access, integrating new amenities into the existing park as seamlessly as possible. Evaluate existing topography to incorporate proposed amenities and resolve issues of accessibility and drainage. Preserve existing mature trees and integrate into the design concept, l p SAN IJAN CANSreANo • SAUAMI Nnr vrv,m.RJtddesi9ngmup.com • 19491493-2600 c"num, I 111V inspiwd Sp,res a, Cnnununff y Insp(red SPnresMir DESIGN GROUP ),4 �f RJ M Scope of Services Our scope of services outlines the various tasks associated with the Conceptual Design Development I'o- the proposed park improvements at City Park and Yarborough Park. 'tasks and methodology below are haled upon review of the project RPP and our extensive experience with similar, projects. Our proposed scope of work is intended to be flexible and can be refined to better meet the needs of the City of Lake Elsinore. At the project onset, RJM Design Group intends to wok with the City to review, elaborate upon, and clarlfythe overall objectives for the development of the project; confirming the expected goals and criteria to be metwitlin each phase of the project. We will also define the appropriate procedures hn Order to promote efficient working relationships and communication between all project: participants. PHASE I -PROJECT PAMILIARIZAl1ON Meet with City Staff to review the project scope, schedule, and budget, while establishing preferred concept direction. Conduct Visual analysis of existing site conditions including topography; drainage, physical limitations, utilities, vegetation, circulation, external influences, access, and adjacent property relationships. Review all documentation fi-om the City pertaining to this project including soils investigations, title report, base map, existing watt; electrical and irrigation systems plans and "as -built' plans for the site, adjacent buildings, and adjacentsit:es as available. RJM will provide a topographic survey of both sites (in AutoCAD format) with 1' contour intervals noting a0 above ground improvements as well as the above mentioned documentation. In order to save on survey costs, we suggest that the surveys occur after the site walk with City staff and concept plan approval in order to identify the extent of site improvements and the extent: of the surveys required to complete the project. Review State, County, and City Codes and Standards applicable to the site development. MLLI I NGS: (1) Kickojfineeting with City Sta%f to receive all documentation availableJ'rorn the City, rejine prajectschedule, and walk sites with City stall PHASE 2 -CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Commence preparation of scaled Preliminary Conceptual Design Plans for City Park and Yarborough Park, which will illustrate the layout and location of proposed site features. The Preliminary Conceptual Design will consider all existing site t0801reS such as: topography/drainage, trees/vegetation, sun exposure/shade, site programming, Ci'CUIRtiOn, adjacent site uses, overall site and ADA compliance, and budget. Preliminary Conceptual Design Plan exhibits for both sites shall include: Limits ofthe site to be developed. Proposed Moments Hardscape/Landscape Improvements (as directed by City Staff) Site Amenities (1313Qs, Irotcoal bins, chinking fountains, etc.) Site furniture (tables, benches, trash cans, etc.) SANCUAN cAPNIPANe • SAr RAWNTO ) ) nrnv.77.I;d0esipn57roup.cmn • [9491493-2000 ,), Additionally, the following improvements are anticipated: City -Park: Park Lighting Parking Lot Improvements YatL4Asl.ugh2u9s Water Spray Pad Prepare Graphic Pian to illustrate potential park elements and features. Prepare soparat:e Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for each park. t =hi C,unnnmliy larynmd:Spncxis' °� Meet with City Staffto review Preliminary Conceptual Design Plans and Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs. Revise the Preliminary Conceptual Design Plan and associated Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs per City Staff direction. HUIINGS: (1) - Meeting with City Staff PRODUCTS• Conceptual Design Plans for Erich Park Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction CostsJnr Each Park Note: Upon approval of the Conceptual Design Plan, we can give you a detailed scope and fee proposal for specific work to be completed in future phases. PHASE 3 - SINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepare Final Design Development Site Plan based upon the approved Preliminary Conceptual Design refinements in oder to define the scope and character for the Project and such elements as may be. appropriate. Consideration shall be given to availability of materials, equipment and labor, construction sequencing and scheduling, economic analysis of construction, user safety, maintenance requirements, and energy conservation. Prepare Final Design Development Site Pian refinements in more detail at a larger scale. Detailed Site Pian refine ne t will be used as the base to prepare construction documents relative to tine park elements. Specific materials, finishes, colors and textures will be selected. Site furnishings and equipment will be selected during this phase. Submit design development plans to City for review. Meet with City staff to review final Design Development Site Plan and costs. Receive final approval prior to construction document preparation. -MILL M S; (1) - Meeting with City stall 'R Wit=, Sinai Design DevelopmentSfte Plan Updated Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for Each Park 12 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO- SACRAMENTO vvnv.RJldaeslpngwoR.rarn • 1949) 493 -Me DESIGN Al, -1 Rj M GROUP PHASE 4 -CONS [PLIC)l ION DOCUMENTS During this phase, the Contract Docmnenes are prepared setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the project. The project consists of the preparation of the Construction Documents to include final drawings, specifications, calculations, and final "Engineers Estimates" for the project in one construction document package based upon the approved Final Design Development Site Plan drawings. Car proposal includes complete landscape architecture, and engineering services required to execute the project. Services (tiring the Construction Document Phase consist of preparation of drawings and specifications based on approved Conceptual Design and Design Development Documents, setting froth in detail the Plnal Const Uctiwn Documents. Construction Drawings nnay include: Grading and Drainage Plan Demolition Plan Construction Plan Planting Plan Construction Details Technical Specifications Splash Pad Manufacturers Requirements and Specifications Standard, Special and Technical Provisions Prepare bid package City to provide: Boiler template Copy of standard drawings and specifications Technical specifications for each of the above disciplines will be incorporated into the project nnmwal. Site work constuctan will be prepared utilizing the Green Book' format. Our proposal has assumed the City will provide Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, instructions to Bidders, information required by Bidders, Bid Fon), Bid Bonds, Agreement, Performance Bond, Payment flood, Insmaace Documents, Gencral Provisions, GeneralJSupplementary Conditions, and General Requirements. Submit plans and to the City at 90% completeness for review and approval. Refine plans per City direction, and submit plans, specifications and estimates at 1.00% completion to City for final approval. Refine plans per Final Plan Check comments. Attend two (2) meetings with City to review Plan Check comments, Submitfinal wet stomped plans to the City for printing and distribution to prospective bidders. Provide digital files of original Plans and Specifications. N1L(-TILV t� (2) City staff meetings. I1NAh P1i(2U (CT'S,: Final Project Plans, Sinned and Sealed Digital Files of Final Project Plans and Specifications (in standard diyital farrnat acceptable by City) Digital Cory ofSpecial and '!ethnical SpecifcaGon Provisions (in Microsoft Word Format) Copy of Final listirnate ofProbable Construction Costs and laid Schedule SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO- SACRNdCNIo '13 mvvtkJMtluY7pn(uupµCom • (949) 493=1600 .Sv', '. ,.'..i �r r ... ,� e• Cmnn,nelfty lnspfmd SFuc� � DESIGN ApjJI oa( J Rj M GROUP BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION (Hourly as Requested) Bidding and construction of the facilities is not included in the Scope of Services, however RJM Design Group is available to answer questions and provide advice during bidding and const uction of the project. Below is an example of the possible Scope of services for Construction. Phase 5: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (Sample Scope BIDDING AND NEGOTIATION The Bidding or Negotiations Phase, following the City's approval of the Construction Documents and of the most recent Statemcnt of Probable Construction Cost, we shall provide those services necessary to assistthe City in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals and in awarding and preparing contracts for constructimn. A. Addenda Services consist of preparation and distribution of Addenda as maybe required during bidding or negotiation and including supplementary Drawings, Specifications, instructions and notice(s) of changes in the bidding schedule and procedure. B. Bidding/Negotiations Services consist of: 1. Assistance to City in establishing list of Bidders or proposers. 2. P requali I ication of Bidders or To op one rs. 3. Participation in pre-bid conferences. 4. Responses to questions IYom Bidders or proposers and clarifications or interpretations of the Bidding Docmnents. S. Attendance at bid opening. G- Docunnentetion and distribution of bidding results. C. Analysisof Alternates/Substitutiois Se vices consist of consideration, analysis, comparisons, and recommendations relative to alternates or substitutions proposed by Bidders or proposers either prior or subscyuenC Un receipt o[13ids or proposals. D. Bid Evaluation Services consist of: 1.. Validation of Bids or proposals. 2. Participation in reviews of Bids or proposals. 3. Evaluation of Bids or proposals. 4. Recommendation on award ofContract(s). 5. Participation in negotiations prior to or following decisions on award of the Coutract(s) for Construction. )q SANJIAN CAPISMANO• SACRAMENTO vnwr.BJMdot,,ggmup,com • 19491493-2600 8mmm�niy Rspimtl at:n<e� � DESIGN RJ M GROUP PHASE 6: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (Sample SCope) The Construction Contract Administration Phase shall provide those services necessary for the administration of d I e construction contract. A. Office Construction AthninisUation 1. Processing of submittals, including receipt, review of; and appropriate action ou Shop Drawings, product Data, Samples and other submitt<ds required by Clno Contract Documents. 2. Distribution of submittals to Owner, Contractor and/o' field representative as regtdred. 3. Maintenance of master file of submittals. d. Related communications. 5. Respond to clarification requested by the Writracto'. 13, Construction Field Observation Services consisting of six (6) visits to the project site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction or as otherwise agreed in writing to become generally IN mil jai, with the progress and quality of the Work and to determine in general if the Woric is proceeding in accordance with the Conhact Documents, and preparing related repots and communications. C. Supplemental Documents Smvices consist oF. 1. Preparation, reproduction and distribution of supplemental Drawings, Specifications and interpretations in response to requests for clarifications by Contractor(s) or the City and as required by construction exigencies. 1). Quotation Requests/Change Orders Services consisting of: 1. Preparation and distribution of Drawings and Specifications to describe Work to be added, deleted or modified. 2. Review of proposals from Contractor(s) for reasonableness of quantities and costs of labor and materials i3. Review and recommendations relative to changes in time Por Substantial Completion. PROJECT SCHEDULE Month 1 Month 2 1Month 3 FMonth 4 Phase 1: Pr oject Familiarization P1115e 2: Conceptual Design PILliC,3 I'Inal Slle DCVCInI]e1COt PIa❑ Phase 1: COulal UClinn DOCtlutetlt5 (to Be Determined based On final Site Devclo nmontPian/Complexity ofProject) _ Phase 5: Bidding/Constuaion Observation/Admioisu•ation (1'o fie ))eNet miund M— hased on_ Complexity of Pi olect)_______ SAN HJ AN GAPIMPAN0 • WTAMI NI0 .1 J lvcnr.l7.IMdespngwup.coni • (949)493-2600 Cmnnumiry ]nsPlrnd Soricns-<.� ~ ( p DESIGN I_.0 o I >CC�pos l GROUP It is the objective of our Design 'Team In provide the most comprehensive, yet efficient, approach to the developmealf of City Park and Yarborough Park Renovation project. This fee includes all costs to he incurred by RJM Design (;reap, Ina with the exception ofreimbm:sable expenses. Fees far the work are as follows: Phase/Task Re Phase 1 Project Familiarization $20010 Phase'2 Conceptual DesWn $11500.00 Topographic Survey MEMO 0 O Total: $25,30100 flase3 Final Site Development Plan" $12,000.00-$111000.00 Phase 4 Construction Documents" $20,000.00 -$30,000.00 Phases 13iddingand Negotiation HOURLY Pfi Construction Services IIOURIY "Note.. Fees far Phases 3 and 4 are identified asa range. Upon approval of Che Conceptual Design Plan, we can give you a detailed sop, and be proposal for specific work to be completed in phases 3 and 4. Ills We Summary represents our current undemanding of the project scope and complexity. "Phe scope of work and asrulculted tees an, subjeet In refinement at Client's request. RI'IMBIIRSAI;IX FXPhNSPS (Estimated Allowance $5,000) When incurred, the following project expenses will be billed at: cost in addition to the ahove fee proposal: • Printing, plotting, copying, scanning, photography, graphic expenses • Delivery and handling of documents, shipping • Permits, plan check, and inspection fees • Soils testing PAYMM's Payments are (Inc and payable on a monthly basis following Che conJPleCimJ ofany substantial phase Ofwork. Carrying charges i'or overdue amour f s beyond 30 days of billing date are charged at 1.19b of Che amount due, compounded monthly. ADDI'TIONAI. SF.RVIC ES Professional services not Specifically Identified in the scope of work will be considered additional services and may he performed at. Client's request, reimbursable at consultant's standard hourly rates. Additional mrViceSMay include, but are not limited to: • Additional meetings, presentations, or site visits beyond those identified in the scope of work. • Exhibit preparation beyond that identified in the scope ofwork. • Revisions to documents reyuirud as a result of changes in Client's direction; changes subsequent to Client's approval; or changes in governmental codes or regulations. • Design of improvements beyond the designated project site, or (Inc to changes in project phasing Schedule. • Engagement of other consultants not specifically identified below. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO , SACRAMPHT) wwvcliJMdesipnp*oup,cu) • I9491 493?600 I AV, w ,ilcc; Ph ym, y `.n ty 1 A) Aat ArAgIt lk •:eel t: As clyI f U Gr mm�niily lnsPimrLSPacW� �_'�' -� l DESIGN (...�i� Proposal al GROUP 5O14.5SiLTAIY o 11CR RLYRAdL S Compensation for additional services will be billed hourly at our standard rates* below; RJ M 1)1 SLIN (iI OUE INCL Principal Landscape Architect $145 - $165 per hour Associate Landscape Architect $130 - $140 per hour Landscape Architect $115 - $125 per hour Job Captain / Landscape Designer $100 - $110 per hour CARD Mhniciau 4£35 - $ 95 per hour Draftsperson $ 70 - $ 80 per hour Word Processor $ 55 - $ 65 per hour MGG CONSULTANTS Principal $184.00 per (tour Project Manager $138.00 per hour Project Engineer $19.5.00 per hour Project Surveyor $138.00 per hour Design Enghwer $103.50 per hour Compeer Draftsperson $8050 per hour Project Assistant $57.50 per hour 3 -Man Survey Crew $322.00 per hour 2 -Man Survey Crew 0.264,50 per hour SW Rl^:NFY &. ASSOCIATES Principal $161.00 Project Manager $938.00 Irrigation Designee- $103.50 AuMCAD Drafters $H125 Administrative Support $74.75 Field Services $149.50 PKLS( Principal $24110 Mandate $27.4-.25 Associate $212.75 Sr. project maria£;er / Sr. UWAng Design / Sr. System 19tgineer $201..25 Project Manager/ Lighting Designer / System lingineer $172.50 Enninter / Assistant Lighting Design / AsAstautSystem Engineer $141SO Designer $121 50 CAD / BIM Specialist $10310 clerical I$HN SAN JOAN CAPISTRANO , SACRAMIFNIO vnvvt R,IMdrslpn9mup.com 194 91 493-2600 Cwsnnonity lls�0ad Sggces DESIGN ec (,I C po'sa l GROUP Billings for all bine and materials and contract extension work shall be in accordance with the leve] of work performed based on the categories listed above. IWurly rates will be escalated each August 1st in accordance with any increase in the Consumer Price Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index, beginning with August 1, 2011 Provisions for be escalation pNO.1 to all contract extensions and additional work. LIMITS OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S LIABILITY QfA Design Group shall not responsible or liable for damages resulting from: hnaccur.ate information provided by Client or others which directly affects the work of RJM including, but not limited to, surveys, utility plans, soils and geology reports. Unknown existing conditions: if the project includes remodelling or rehabilitation, it shall he understood that this type of design requires that certain assumptions be made regarding existing Conditions, and these assumptions cannot be verified without expenditure of additional funds and/or destruction of otherwise adequate or serviceable portions of the site, Client )grecs to defend, indemnify and hold harmless RJM and its officers, employees and consultants from any and all liability, real or alleged, for any lm , costs, dam ages, awards, attorneys fees ;and other expenses in connection with the above items, except liabilfty arising from the sole negligence of RJM. SANJUAN CAPIMRANO • SACRAMIINR) vnvv,.11JMdexignpioUO.com (94914932600 i .•k�Y;� Sllt %i;li Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 7) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-550 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City or Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 CITY OF LADE LSIROITE EjCTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Application for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Funds (SB 821) Recommendation 1. Authorize application for state funding available under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) SB 821 to receive FY 2015-16 TDA Article 3 allocation of $695,000. Background TDA Article 3 funds are administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and distributed to local agencies on an annual basis. Two percent of the Local Transportation Fund revenue is made available each year for use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects in Riverside County. TDA Article 3 local funds are available to local agencies to cover engineering expenses, right-of-way acquisition, and construction costs for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. In addition, TDA Article 3 local funds may also be used as an agency's local match contribution to bicycle and pedestrian grant applications. In the past, these funds have been used to assist in the development, construction, and local match contributions of various bikeway and pedestrian projects such as, the Sidewalk Improvements Project ($360,927), Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project ($401,673), and SB821 Sidewalks Project ($467,979). Discussion The purpose of this report is to request City Council authorization to apply for state funding available under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) SB 821 to receive FY 2015-16 TDA Article 3 allocation of $695,000. Application For Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle And Pedestrian Facility Funds (SB 821) April 28, 2015 Page 2 For the current funding cycle the City will submit proposals for the following new projects: • Bicycle Lane Striping & Signage ($100,000): Rosetta Canyon Drive between Ardenwood and Elsinore Hills Road; Rosetta Canyon Drive between SR -74 and Ardenwood Way • Missing Link Sidewalks ($595,000): Campus Way between Sumner and Heald; Sumner at Campus Way, Sumner between Silver Street and Campus Way; Silver Street between Sumner and Heald; Townsend at Heald; Heald between Townsend and Matich Street These projects are located near schools and would enhance public safety for Elsinore Elementary and Middle schools. A copy of this staff report has been communicated with the Lake Elsinore Unified School District Director of Facilities and Transportation. Fiscal Impact If the Council authorizes the submittal of the TDA Article 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds Local Claim Form it will allow the City to draw down $695,000 in FY 2015-16. The required fifty percent local match will be satisfied using TRIP revenue, Gas Tax, and Measure A funds. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Public Works Director Approved by: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 8) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-551 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsipore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/2312015 CtTY OF LADE LSII`10KE DIRLAM EX'rREm REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC. AND THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($120,000.00) between HR Green California, Inc. and the City of Lake Elsinore for engineering staffing and services. Background And Discussion HR Green California, Inc. is a municipal consulting firm serving public agencies and will be working closely with City staff through delivering capital projects and engineering services on a temporary basis until the vacant Public Works Director and the vacant Principal Engineer positions are filled. HR Green California, Inc. will bring to the project extensive Capital Improvement Project experience that exceeds city staff capacity. This experience extends the range of complete spectrum of circulation, infrastructure and public facility projects for municipalities. FISCAL IMPACT The $120,000 for engineering professional services has been budgeted in the FY 14/15 CIP and general engineering services have been budgeted in the Operating budget. HR Green California, Inc. Professional Services Agreement April 28, 2015 Page 2 Prepared by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Professional Services Agreement with HR Green California, Inc. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC. ENGINEERING AND PROJECT SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made and entered into as of April 28, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC.. ("Consultant'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On March 31, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Professional Services" (the "Original Agreement'). Section 3. Compensation of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The compensation to the agreement shall be increased by One Hundred Twenty Thousand, and No Cents ($120,000). The total compensation will equal One Hundred Fifty Thousand, and No Cents ($150,000). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney "CONSULTANT" HR GREEN CALIFORNIA, INC. George A. Wentz, Vice President EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL See Original Proposal Professional Engineering Services for Delivery of Capital Projects and plan reviews. Staffing hours payable on an hourly basis up to but not exceeding $150,000. City Engineer $165 hourly Project Manager $160 hourly Special Projects Advisor $170 hourly AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND HR GREEN This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of April 8, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and HR Green. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: Rosetta Canyon Park sport fields design concept with parking and concession area. B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). HR Green Professional Services Agmt 2015[2].docx Page 1 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed thirdty thousand dollars and no cents ($30,000.00) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. _Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff.. 5. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensingof __ Intellectual_ Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium Page 2 of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 7. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. Page 3 8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility_,_ Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. Page 4 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. I. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability_ Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per Page 5 occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"), No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. V. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. i. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of_Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: HR Green Attn: George A. Wentz 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1025 Orange, CA 92868 17. George A. Wentz Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be Page 7 fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue, This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunit)t Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. PrevailingWages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, at seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30. Execution, This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" "CONSULTANT" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal HR Green corporation Grant Yates, City Manager George A. Wentz, PE Vice President ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Initial Proposal Page 10 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL [ATTACHED] April 22, 2015 Mr. Grant Yates City Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 HRGr en Subject: Proposal, Professional Engineering Staffing Services & Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Dear Mr. Yates: HR Green California, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for staffing and support services to provide for the delivery of Capital Projects and as needed staff augmentation. We are uniquely qualified for this assignment for the following reasons: Project Familiarity — HR Green has a long history of successful working relationships and has worked on many capital improvement and development projects. Our team has worked to meet day to day and technical demands of City Engineering departments throughout Southern California. Project Team — We have provided a unique team of professionals that include registered engineers, administrators, public work directors, certified water quality experts, and support staff. While most of the 350+HR Green staff members have worked with municipal clients, many of our staff has also worked directly for a government entity, which gives us a unique perspective on how we should provide services to our public sector clients. The experience and expertise of this team will be critical to addressing the immediate delivery requirements of the CIP. Funding Success — We have secured and/or provided assistance to cities to obtain grant funding for capital projects. Over the past 10 years HR Green has secured over $200 million in grant funding for its municipal clients. Having the knowledge and success with funding will position Lake Elsinore in maximizing its revenue source to implement a successful and expedited CIP plan. Approach — We have provided an Integrated Planning approach for your consideration and provide you with optimum flexibility. Having conducted an initial review and evaluation of your operations we have a good understanding of the support that would best meet your immediate needs and be available to you — at your discretion. We understand your specific need to provide the immediate staff support you require and to address the CIP planning for your $50 million FY 14-15 program and project delivery strategy for streets, pavement, sidewalk and other. We propose to help with the delivery of projects to maximize the utilization of your available bond funds. It will service you well and help you meet your broader vision, goals and objectives - consistent with the expectations of elected leaders. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to continue working with the City of Lake Elsinore. Sincerely, i George A. Wentz, PE Vice -President 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1025 Orange, CA 92868 Phone: 714.287.2275 E -Mail: gwentz@hrgreen.com City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Cover Letter Table of Contents Firm Overview and Qualifications............................................................................... 1 FirmProfile.............................................................................................................. 1 ProjectExperience.................................................................................................. 2 Our Approach to Delivering Capital Projects............................................................... 7 Scopeof Work.......................................................................................................... 11 Resumes................................................................................................................... 15 FeeSchedule............................................................................................................ 20 City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Firm Overview and Qualifications Firm Profile In business for more than 100 years HR Green, Inc. (HR Green) perinially ranks as one of Engineering News Record's Top 300 Design and Top 100 Construction Management Firms in the United States. The firm has roughly 355 employees and 15 offices throughout the United States, including a Southern California office. HR Green has maintained California operations since 2004, and in 2012 established a separate California corporate entity, HR Green California, Inc. From a Public Works/Engineering standpoint, our staff members include registered engineers, certified water quality developers/practitioners(QSD/QSP) and accessibility (CASp) specialists. HR Green staff members have played a key role in the evolution and growth of agencies throughout Southern California. Code Interpretations Building Plan Review ,Organizational Review Building Inspection Chief Building Official Permit and Counter Staffing * CASp Assessment and Consulting * Public Education and Outreach * Staff Training Standards and Procedures Development "Departmental Management Interim Staff Support Staff Augmentation / Shared Services Organizational Reviews/ Analysis Fee and Rate Reviews CIP Funding and Administration x- Alternative Service Delivery Regulatory Compliance �V Growth and Impact Analysis Civil and Transportation Engineering Grant Writing and Administration Stormwater Quality Management Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Operations/Maintenance Management Inspection Quality Assurance / Quality Control Claims Management Resident Engineering Owner's Representative Site Management City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects From strategic planning through delivery of a successful project, we bring our public agency clients a full range of integrated services that address their needs, no matter how big or small. A cornerstone of our expertise is the provision of on-call professional engineering services to 50+ California agencies. Our firm and staff is noted throughout Southern California for our ability to successfully build consensus among a variety of public agency, regulatory, permitting, and community stakeholders and oversee the successful delivery of community -sensitive projects. Organizational Stability and Strength Since being founded in 1913 HR Green has long maintained a strong and vibrant financial condition. Last year's revenue exceeded $55 million. Our firm continues to have a strong balance sheet, is well capitalized, and is very well positioned to fulfill all of its obligations. Due to our aggressive financial discipline, our balance sheet remains strong and healthy. We have no conditions that would impede our ability to complete your assignments. Below is a representative list of agencies our staff members have served overthe years along with the breadth of services provided. N VD e 6 T N d V N a d =:. o. R a o- `c = C, Q `w.Noi L q: u t E E �' d E O x L o a me 0 O O O O O O O O O. O O o° o o C O O O p O O O 9 Services i u -� aT+ '.✓T T aT+ r u N i u r 0 - 3 N r u u aT+.. u 0 Y T: U; s„a U U U U uo U ,; u U U U U U Su; On -Site Staffing v°- V V x✓ :✓ v1. ✓ .' v v _ ` sF v'' ,< el' v` v, City Engineering t✓ v- ✓ ,( ,✓ CIP Program Management V, rr d f :/ w” V V c✓ V ;l =✓ ;/ M' Civil Plan / Map Check e% 1f V, V ai jf sf✓ V ✓ V V v, v V ;{ y=" V sf y✓ ✓ .,✓ Er' o✓ Master Planning.✓ ✓ v` ¢✓ v s` v ✓ +! .✓ -0' w e/ V Civil and/or Traffic Design/Engineering t/ c%, V ✓ ,✓ V V sl v" V v, r' s✓ -✓ 1✓` „✓ w/ Grant Writing/Administration of v` V V ;✓ �✓� u`` e' e� - Construction Management/Inspection ,v, ;! ,( V d ;✓ Stormwater Quality Management '¢/� � v� 4'` v, v v.✓ v, v -/ ;/ - r t% t/ Permitting .✓ ,.. ->� .f zf` zt' ¢✓ Vl ..l ✓" v/ Document Control -r� �`` - ✓ - -; - ..! -✓ City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement On -Call Professional Engineering City of lurupa Valley Dates: 2011— Ongoing ✓ Building Official ✓ Plan Review (Building and Civil) ✓ Inspection (Building and Civil) ✓ Permit Counter Support ✓ Water Quality Studies ✓ Code Compliance ✓ NPDES Compliance ✓ Traffic Engineering ✓ Construction Management ✓ Building Official ✓ Civil Engineering / Design ✓ Grant Funding ✓ Departmental Management ✓ CIP Administration ✓ Public Works Maintenance ✓ Value Engineering ✓ GIS ✓ Transition Manage only California city to provide 100% of its municipal services through Alternative Service Delivery providers / Second most cost- efficient city in Riverside County based on cost of service per capita Since 2011 City incorporation HR Green provides full departmental management and on-site staffing for Building & Safety, Public Works, and Engineering Coordinated transition of all services from County to City Budget, administer and manage CIP program; value engineering and permitting for road, drainage, water, wastewater, and park projects; plan review; traffic studies; utility coordination; establish development guidelines/protocols; review of Water Quality Management Plans; GIS implementation; permitting and inspections Design pavement rehabilitation projects citywide Coordinate project improvements, service delivery, and maintenance with multiple special districts 100% compliance providing permit inspections within 24 hours 100% success rate meeting plan review turnaround schedule Assign an engineering bench of 10+ on-site staff to deliver CIP and land development projects Budget, administer and manage $7.2 million CIP program; value engineering and permitting for road, drainage, water, wastewater, and park projects; plan review; traffic studies; utility coordination; establish development guidelines/protocols; review of Water Quality Management Plans; GIS implementation; permitting and inspections Developed Local Implementation Plan and provide NPDES compliance inspection Prepare grant applications and have procured $4+ million in federal and state funding to date Design, construction management, and inspection of $2 million in "From a public works standpoint their staff has managed the design and construction of capital improvement projects and worked closely with stakeholders, utilities, other agencies, property owners and the travelling public to provide helpful communication that mitigates construction impacts. Their design staff is very efficient, nimbly responds to changing field conditions, keeps senior management and City Council informed of project status, and has been able to advance high priority projects of Jurupa Vi dley's caC,it. l innprovement program from FY 2014/15 to the current fiscal year....HR Green has effective management controls in place to control costs and provide timely information regarding project progress. The City has no hesitation in recommending their services." Gary Thompson City Manager, City ofJurupa Valley pavement rehabilitation projects citywide Coordinate project improvements, service delivery, and maintenance with multiple special districts 100% compliance providing permit inspections within 24 hours City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects ;_' 100% success rate meeting 15/10/5 plan review turnaround schedule Reduced overall operational costs by approximately 35% Costs in permit processing and inspection fees to applicants due to shorter turnaround times and lower costs — an estimated 20 — 35% reduction Less time taken in responding to resident inquires and in processing development applications Staffing level flexibility to right -size quickly for dynamically changing needs and priorities Increased development activity / Processed 2,000+ new residential units past year On -Call Professional Engineering City of Placentia Dates: 2011— Ongoing ✓ Development Review ✓ Water Quality Studies ✓ City Engineering ✓ Construction Management ✓ Value Engineering ✓ Departmental Management ✓ Plan Review (Building & ✓ Permit Processing ✓ CIP Administration Program Management ✓ Grant Funding FIR Green provides as -needed city/civil engineering, project management, and city engineering Project management for $16 million Metrolink station and five railroad grade separation projects (award-winning OC Bridges Projects) valued at over $400 million Oversees CIP design; and provides plan checking, specification review, and construction oversight Represents the City to assure that these projects comply with City standards and guidelines Extensive collaboration with Orange County Transportation Authority, multiple cities, utilities, and water agencies to facilitate permits and improvements Oversaw $6.5 million in street rehabilitation improvements citywide through gas tax funding Oversees pavement rehabilitation design and construction, including the $400,000 Richfield Road widening over the OCFD Channel " 1 wholeheartedly endorse FIR Green to other agencies in need of city engineering, project management and plan check services." Troy Butzlaff, ICMA-CM Former City Administrator, City of Placentia (now City Manager at City of Azusa) City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Our Approach to Delivering Capital Projects Combining engineering expertise with unparalleled strength in municipal planning and funding, we assist our local government clients in implementing successful projects and developing effective Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs). The CIP process aids a community in making sound annual budget decisions, thus providing the ability to stabilize debt and consolidate projects to reduce borrowing costs. By utilizing a well-documented CIP, a community can focus on preserving their infrastructure while ensuring the efficient use of public funds. HR Green helps municipalities prepare for the CIP process by providing many communities with services such as providing budget numbers for capital projects, helping staff identify and prioritize projects, and then assisting them with finding funding sources for those projects. The CIP process ensures that various projects reflect the community's short and long-term goals and objectives while planning for a successful implementation and funding strategy. HR Green helps municipalities gather and analyze data that is necessary to ensure that projects be looked at collectively, as opposed to individually, to determine their value to the community. HR Green typically reviews the community's current assets such as roads, bridges, sanitary sewer systems, water mains distribution, waste water treatments plants, lift stations and municipal buildings and grounds as well as vehicle/fleet maintenance. For example, for items such as roads, HR Green has helped communities by reviewing the condition of all roads and then rating and ranking them according to their condition. This helps the municipalities develop a plan for long-term repair and replacement. The Capital Improvement Plan includes opportunities for The CIP process aids a community in making sound immediate delivery of projects. In delivering the projects, annual budget decisions that can also be linked back to it is important to identify that this plan includes the the goals of a strategic plan and create responsibilities funding of projects which are related both to the for the various departments. The CIP process can also maintenance and replacement of existing assets as well as provide the ability to stabilize debt and consolidate the evaluation and introduction of new projects, services projects to reduce borrowing costs. By utilizing a well and facilities to be able to respond to the increasing needs documented CIP, a community can focus on preserving of a growing and diverse population. This balance is not their infrastructure while ensuring the efficient use of only desirable but more importantly, necessary if Lake public funds and also plan for the future growth and development of the community. Elsinore is to retain and expand upon the quality of life which the residents enjoy. Ultimately, the benefit of the CIP is not measured in the number of projects or dollars expended in any single year, but rather is measured cumulatively in achieving the long range goals of the community. Conversely, this is the one of the benefits of having a CIP. It allows for the annual evaluation, prioritization, and scheduling of projects via a uniform, consistent, and objective process. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Some of the features of Lake Elsinore's CIP include: A well-documented "spreadsheet" listing the Capital projects The project ranking in order of preference/priority The plan for financing the projects A time table for the construction or completion of the projects x Justification for the projects Explanation of expenses for the projects Guiding future community growth and development Encouraging more efficient government and transparency Do's and Don'ts of Capital Improvement Planning Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) is a helpful process that elected officials, administrators and department leaders use to prioritize physical improvement projects and facility needs in their communities for both short-range (typically five to ten years) and long-term planning up to 20 or more years. Essentially, the plan provides a link between the various community departments and the local government entity. CIP also provides assurance that the improvements are consistent with the community's short-range and long-term goals. It can be used as a valuable tool to prioritize and plan for capital improvement projects for physical assets including but not limited to roads, sanitary sewer and water mains, sidewalks, storm sewers, vehicles, equipment, public buildings, parks, and water and waste water treatment plants. Many times, the CIP prioritization process can be somewhat overwhelming for community leaders. Learning from experienced CIP planners, and other communities, may eliminate common mistakes with this process. Below are some DO's and DON'TS to consider while undertaking your CIP process. CCE% DO's Stress the costsavings of proactive maintenance. Many leaders like the impact of big roadway reconstruction projects, since these are sometimes necessary to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow as well as spur economic development. However, reconstruction may be one of the least cost effective improvement strategies. For example, crack sealing and rejuvenation can buy a few years of service life at $10,000 per mile, milling and resurfacing typically buys 10 years of service life at $200,000 per mile, and a reconstruction buys approximately 20 years of service life at $2 million per mile. The best long-term approach may be proactive maintenance. Also, if building a new asset, include projected maintenance and operation expenses for future years' projections to ensure the plan considers the cost to maintain the long-term ability of the community to maintain the asset. Look for project sharing opportunities with adjacent communities that benefit both. Consider whether a water system interconnect for emergency supply can also facilitate routine system repairs and maintenance. Also, shared usage of major vehicle purchases orjoint infrastructure improvement programs that help to gain the benefits of economy of scale for bidding can be investigated. It is not just your community that is doing a CIP; there are numerous opportunities to interact with neighboring communities or agencies (i.e., RCTD, Caltrans, WRCOG, RCFC&WCD, RCTC) to get projects accomplished at a lower cost to all participants. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Consider phasing a project. This may increase your probability of securing project funding by outlining a more realistic implementation schedule. Not all projects can be phased, but be sure to consider phasing if it is an option. Phasing projects can have a positive effect on the selection process by applying a realistic balance of resource needs over a defined period of time. Consider night work. Base projects on recommendations cited in the Comprehensive/Master Plan and consider how each project aligns with the strategic needs established by the Board/ Council. Administrators and elected officials who are mindful of the importance of using these strategic plans to determine when, where and how resource allocation should be targeted, typically want to see connections between funding requests for capital projects and the comprehensive plan and strategic needs. Identify alternative revenue sources and show cost savings for justification. Don't just ask for projects and money. Figure out how the project can be financed as well. This criterion can significantly increase the priority of a specific project. Obviously, the more significant the percentage of funds secured through external sources (such as grants), the more likely a project may be scheduled. You will be much more successful in getting projects approved if you also tackle the funding issues upfront. Show and track the grant funding being applied for and obtained for each project. Additionally, if a project can save costs in the long-term, the project's priority may be strengthened. For example, retrofitting street lighting to LED and/or pump energy efficiency retrofits could pay for themselves in a matter of several years, and continue to save costs in the long run. CIP DON'Is Don't prepare a CIP based solely upon thefunds that are currently available. Frequently, engineers, public works directors and planners need to tell elected officials the bad news; that what they are allocating for funding isn't enough to accomplish their goals and that they need to look further. Maybe they cannot fund it in the short-term, but "plant the seed" to get them thinking about the longer term vision. It's a very important exercise to define the community's needs and help administrators and elected officials determine which projects are most imperative, regardless of current funds available. Don't wait until a project beconres an emergency. Ask as early as possible if you need a major project inserted into a CIP. Consider requesting this a year or two earlier than absolutely needed. Understand that a project may not get approved or funded initially, but it may begin to establish the groundwork for inclusion in future years. Don't overlook including comprehensive projects. For example, if doing a full roadway reconstruction, make sure to include the related underground utility improvements. This sounds obvious, but it is often overlooked. Don't overlook current development patterns and project future maintenance needs. For example, think of all the rapid -growth communities that experienced 25% or more of their community built new in the mid 2000s. It is great for many communities to have new infrastructure, but determine if anyone has planned for the huge increase in resurfacing needs that will be necessary about 15 years after initial construction. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Don't forget to provide justification for the project„ Aside from cost, this is one of the most significant points of the CIP and plays a major role in prioritizing projects. Project justifications tend to focus on public benefit and how the project achieves goals that prevent harm, ensure safety or satisfy a related community objective. For example, park plans might emphasize the need to provide a safe play area for children or upgrade playground equipment that does not meet safety standards. Don't forget to consider the impacts of not constructing the project. Providing factual information about the consequences of unfunded improvements should be considered. Most importantly, make sure the CIP ties in the key components of the community's strategic long-term plan, and annual budgeting process, as this will help get "buy -in" from the top officials down to each department head. The CIP can also be used as an opportunity for supporting the community's mission and vision, providing an outlook well into the future. Finally, keep in mind that in many cases you are presenting the CIP for projects and expenses that will extend well beyond the terms of the current elected officials. A sensible CIP can help prevent making commitments and incurring debts that may prevent the implementation of more important projects in the future, thereby strengthening the long-term financial well-being of the community. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Scope of Work Current Key Issues with City Engineering Division Limited staffing. City currently has a City Engineer vacancy and heavy workload assignments in Capital Projects. Existing staff does not have the time to complete project responsibilities. Backlog of work including accounting for project tasks and acceptance of new project work. Lack of technical skills resulting in the inability to manage both short and long term project issues. V. Additional workload due to contractors' requests for information and documents. Proposed Scope of Work The City is seeking professional engineering and staffing expertise in all areas of the City's CIP, including City Engineer, Senior Engineer, and special project advisor functions. We are committed to initiating, facilitating, and maintaining open communication to see that each project is advanced from the design board to construction at the earliest opportunity. We believe this opportunity provides the City with independent analysis of engineering performed to date and proper management of resources. As an outside consultant, we are prepared to make immediate recommendations to deliver capital projects. Given the nature of this assignment, HR Green proposes to provide a "project strike team." Jim Smith, PE will provide overall weekly direction and expert guidance as a special projects advisorfor the engagement. The professional engineers we are assigning to manage the day to day project delivery include Ken Rukavina, PE, QSD and Steve Loriso, PE, QSD. Work Plan Roles and Responsibilities Ken Rukavina, PE, QSD - City Engineer Ken will fill the role as City Engineer to establish, direct, plan, surpervise, and organize the City Engineering assignments for Capital Projects and Land Development serving under the Public Works Director. Ken will analyze the project proposals and assist in delivering projects. Steve Loriso, PE, QSD - Project Manager Steve will manage the delivery of the capital improvement program, including completing designs, project specifications, and budget control. He will assist staff with advertising projects for construction bid, work with the finance department to establish proper cost accounting of all project monies, and work to recover costs for services rendered. Ken will provide weekly updates to the Public Works Director. Jim Smith, PE - Special Projects Advisor Jim will complete quality control of proposals, assist with recommendations to expedite project delivery, review final documents, and make recommendations to advance projects into construction. He will assist the Public Works Director with day to day assignments to keep project momentum. Jim will be available to help resolve decisions needed involving informal bidding, studies, or other technical support. '11110M ,, City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Report Writing Our team will prepare staff reports for department heads, city council, and various committees/ commissions, as requested. This will include project progress reports and monthly/regularly scheduled meetings with the designated City representative. In addition, we will provide monthly invoicing with detail in the format desired by the City. Following are sample pages from a recent monthly progress report we provided to the Jurupa Valley City Council. 12 S_ Engineering Division t<.;,. Key s Accomplishments Continued construction ofFY 13-14 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation project' Award bid to Manhole Adjusting Inc. for fY 14 IS Citywide Pavement Rehabllltallon project '.. a Continue to implement encroad,ment permit hacking colic, ig GlS n Worked with City Attorney to prepare memo to City Council for approval of required appraisals for ilf c right of way acquisitions for Limonite Avenue Antietam, (Etiwanda to Patti Ear Developer completed donated gateway monumen with "wagon wheel" for limonite Avenue Muffin Itjs" Hardscape project pr n Updated federal TIP with RC(C and SCAG for projects within City E x Continuing discussion with the County for design concepts for a future project at RubdonalsR60 x Completed installation and review of second phase of striping install and marking program. Began preparation on several additional infill staff requests. f�l� k�� � '�r" Engineering Division Reviewed and completed the new speed and beige volume surveys Forwarded revised updated sheets for Completion of maps. umdown timer, and puzn l,uu"ns.e d9 imrrseceum. Discussed final reve9mof the osmoltanPprepared truck study info, u trailed Plans and snrorra:in,forroadway rcwlk6oko;,, on Camino nevi bo,,w,,n me Per lde rs = county rand cokfoi It tatter conservation Dwmr. structure ata Whaney Dole began pubudatlon of the staff III III 191 ei odnn rred.oml, loololiM54 remffiindello.ns Pill month e Worked with the RGSD on the Installation of the new Crossroads acct ' Handled 54 bMos trlapcon,mwdonns edans thbnved, The system will allow City staff to generate report summaries in-hou mem from the sheriff's Department Stormwater Inlet Maintenance n Summarized traffic acdden t data from the Sheriffs Department to it NPDES Paimn regnaenreon nuns, led ni, Is dean at vast anal of t. 039 novo alerfair,..M lo,atim,v eidursi 011.1.115 • Continued field inspections to verify traffic control sign locations ver Devee,val a mmpmhenwe solution aummncfor IN effideot cokenese of monanmue Geld signs telhedazab daWbavuentnlII data. data, tracking mojnt ar,nrs-and onaluzo, data trends for lornrowdlonconre asset SianSeman6aermit,nd development onhe City's Streetsign RetroaeOectiviry Malmenance he Short ooagemelrt (:aortal standard deadline starting January 201 S. pnoweal rd OS snednnsumernined ammuvaar;aer, doll forded 11«colons andeduco aces numbs d to [rolle, r 63 duekase • Met with JC5D Construction Manager and contractors on the Arco 8 = contained Gly's Gs database to wort widuv, widowing Gra fmrsofnel to collect dam tisane a sora,, Avenue between 615 and Etiwanda Avenue, the 870P7 project alonp "hone or table, Jurupa Road Trunk Sewer project along Arrest rang Road and Valley, Dovetailed mapn hen nNd at,ff pdodtln. I—nooand mgecuon of dao career and more eff¢ienuy and construction staging Continued working with the developers all and comioo I, coordinate the repaving of Beliegrave between Etiwanda and h ti staff., aaemm,an data even.. hoar Will erwIe... ar on onlooin are field * Awarded the bid and prepared the stria report for the traffic siS^lulu n A" nem dao synod dally uenvern star: oll—or III and 6S malar r year City budget amendment Bid package includes traffic signal con GIS mows call, lnin, rovIluacde ha,ow, how inn dr tool radiant had beenorrovok and velour countdown timers and push buttons at 47 intersections. ,on o!noruel'en ved was a,., abordanl ^ Worked with Capital Projects on revisions to the pians and speclficat xet�vem"'Pno Cannot Peal between the RCFC&WCD structure and Whitney Drive. Minn. fou revs Siem for., a. 2 peconrrwsl drool 8691n,es-84rk of shear slarnd for November and to Council in December e, course erMeding,he WDi5 o,oimmem go furbished a GIS normwater foie, database ordh cranal lmerace acerrfom for future onIo nae " finalized plans Lo tourist, traffic issues at Stone Elemental,,Glen Av orrinvornrenl and soune dcc6mmmaUnq assoumed einche ear's s,nmuva.or syuem Elementary schoolsinstallednew signing and defineatprs no Pyrite removed 27 tans and 3.87E c cuts feel of deals fmmlhe catch basins 6a io ntary school, Completed curb painting at Stone school and soh week of November Scheduled the Granite Hill signing and striping to-- November.– a Met with BUD staffregarding temporary traffic control for the Marl 4 = Began Work on ATP grafi atlmnlls[ration'.Obtained project numbers nr. only parkingy; o° a ad . u Received bids and will award contract in Novemher for the traffic sig rd year City budget amendment, Bid package included traffcsgnaa° Cillo!fen,Valley. heal Year l01415 Onoifer Prngrers token iu rr""w 1 �' -'9 ' 12 S_ City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Public Works Department Int:ate mn struamnfor SCID" Marr"Sh-lJAguaMama Traf., S.,a,l And Pavement ra,hAnlarren rrle[t Cantina nslrudlm+of lY 13 -IO Ctpwide Pav reM1ob➢Itatlonprajec laPP:^+immely ],tbp,IXlOSi ^I AflAAI aM 56uryseall wltb enimateU mmplellon Nuvoinbm' 301J P,n,,eG,l0.ery<Ie grant for oylewfed asphaltV ra,, Prnnrom Pro-ess ATP piaM funding doc^mentnlon for Pyrite Ammo^ And Troth 51,111, ^ Award rY 1415 Paven,ert Reh IDtla:on prolett Io l.ov&nlwr „ Sol it, pro few ion 31 serves for dnsiEn oKitYS two ATP Pram pro, Scw(Tr^lh and Pno) ° NwicoonnolMOU'IR dCounty f TFOP hond flooir,l( d ralo t arourrenance ' C It t £f F t ...... o"tel 1 ] T e U II T ', or fl, C v a } d hairy, ne, 11.1 -rd nol 1 rets na,lerelo, raw noffir11 f. 1 —I.old o, .1.11, 1 plor. p I gflIn, t Store Meren, andl Aole Street v Contruewarkeng wahclol Pr^lec 10 crep!rte tloph-and f is for Carlaw Real re -num work andbp I nal pre ss for Ne Troth and Pyr to ATP Pt4ecls v Com m, devolof,wnt<f lot par div plmeJ replxelyer of na4T rogW9oN, ruing And ehlc-'ct roarAer s gns to conph+a hr the Fn WA reg' Iremen:s for v 6n etrofkuioily Issue and nnipr, a for Carry war pa,a,,.r wn,k W_oNon ltovmhar, r '^'So", Pian,as(meet"'caro";r reviews, e¢.j Engineering Division n^P.,,, grand to please n^a (h... and ,ann"ha, mtluar le, Pnnom,ance 'mann.. rcr uu Mort Workz Drevm;mu. TIrreering(A-i.1 try..eeara 1— C 4 "ner, crmdm lP'r aphah tw^ do" o`sbn", f Cpe a-yorn—Ineentpe -. pe `lP 1.111. 1l t, apnl.1,11 Prowons t r . x R h l"'oer, .ho,tal Work iho,lerdera farDeveloPn P uun.Maonal 1 0,r nrl^mpa war, rn-11, a, X11.1 a Engineering Division Engineering Review of Planoin6 Propats fl 13 9allk/ParWnIS Re4ues4 n at N! S g _ ........ 0.u.v - a 4el armee—n—elnn"ne. ..... e v..mnin,veme., C�.YeI}up I IY vr]Di _Oc I. P Rre,rl pct 13 City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects 'Public Works Departmente r STATUS_SVMMAQ, OYPRodo, Of 2010.2015 CIP 12U4 Unceite Avenue colp emuonam, 51,315,m)0 nor of wel RAY acbibran Worce," Etiwanda Addllwnl and bilTnNaa6on dIen'us Aeon, min 117,. full Fu.'er—ol a mi.'er—al clme] r ,sque"I"1b, 011MNOl aPWovett. crunch VIe fill P/1V, OPC NN! mnwltant 12LW1 Van Duren Blvd. 51,913.00b) On— . PSG[ 9541 eaTnlole, Id EPA P"ement bei real dcaunwaybnincew younceredle, pending(millet LCCOOE mace lit ifmarta m 501h 1208 IlmmMe Nwrwe Plumed Pmlal No 5631.000 Preo,, cen"Ill.( e4 vavvnrem so JOSE, sewer Channel) vavemeal¢comiructcn Fehablincon, nuilendi0n plans enpleted on north side. Hurry maul to ons ilk, Amo and Wdke1 wel, on wwh ode on BOW bondln8 R M EI(veenda Ienilan- alycobit relecau-of frees Ace slfina4 ill lull ou'donon late Nwenrhe, 12,09 Runde St and Galena Colo. --11, 52liccu) It eornbin. wim 1113114 $l vaysiona Aetna, ]3/14 Pave mart hive col Rehatiftads, pr4)ezt(ue remdbndle to Van Relobillmaon cool 13 A4 for amwv) Oce n 6 logre l2M'\V'dony 1212 Anaoal Pr20R/13 Purled ,a I, Sell ley "I Oion Sanbbound call, hand "row off, eompleied turn al Potile: feel lramfet to Van Improvement Doren Phame 2. (sae Van Boren hose Prngom;Ree 2) Proton 12.1ia,12- lab8t2-121) 13-a4 Annmh013-14 Ameadoegmal 5?Ic"Gan) coolmoiet in P mQmss wart Pavemam undo, glair l)on onimaiedmmpelltn in tiawmber, Petrat,eamean 2/201,Imlded Of, Prolea,5beely bel Addendum Neighboncdm TBI) a12014 add. Rolle/Galant pnving(and Sniff 130 toaPaN Roadwry A(COM acouloni 5100.000 fhadepon remw. and lL. Houdin, Iferemban Siad, vainue ahem, Maintenance Division ^ Applied chemical herbicide In areas on the following streets: Sky Coumry tout tigh4of-way tall • Replaced vandalincerfussinF lettering on Rubid Wx Village entry monuments on Mission at Crelnvre and Mister at Awmaidw • Ctenncd 836 catch basins ending In 28 tons of central removed front 5tonn Drain system, work done per MS4 orom ucent • Removed 30 dead or diseased trees due to safely after emmmendolion from cont tared City cdoulsl • Condoned grid trimming full Cuy tooling 329 cry, trimmed, soneeurneing Ia Maintmame Zones 2 and 3 • Crucia algid vdth Riverside Courtly Anima coconut to remove oldmal carcasses (goats) lrom Beach coolto nil andami"e stofgemt, e Councinate0 with Ounces Waste Hollers for large illegal comp removal from hall Avenue, Wmiace, Canal Street, Avalon Street, Sierra Avenue, Reach Sirom, and Steve Street • Coo.inaced with l to remove abandoned 5th wince nude home from Wth west of mal • Cmtdi and why SCSI) to remove abundance vehicle frons Wallace Street m Ball Awl • eoaohlemad with 11, remove abandoned coNcle from Pyrite at Stam Route W • Coordinated with Rill de County landscape and Llgining Maintenance ydbndr to replace voids In "might iron tence olong Ilrnonile Avenue • all sin 11buf tl(malbellueng su'ee[list polesto Somhttn ondea is Edison for ropairs. all mpairs were curdled. Imialled 2 dr:Jnage haaas and 1201F of ill, no 56th rod Fagan to dbeR nursonm water (mm damaged AC roadway to PCC curb and gutter installed and repahed 20 LF of damaged guardrail, three pmts and two end pieces R"mo ed 18,811 LE a roadway striping e Repainted 2,269 LF of red curb Repainted 329 areas of 8' krons and .an arrow, msohed 214 rased F.rvement mockers -' Cbmpland 4,980 LF drigl4o a sadc,byremoving weeds, shahs and offervegetber, Repaired and replaced 42 posy and 184 signs Gamed 180 LF of gutter by removing mod and other debris v Tire ed slxveesobonoring signage orpedestrian knosads • Filled 2,713 SF of potholes in roadway • On 1011 responded to call out from SheriiP.v Oep scent on Ganite hill al Pedley due to car Lumber bio. -king roadway. Removed bumpers, secured road, and removed boned with animal para. • On 10/11 responded to traffic accident on Fehpar If fil. Conducted traffic crucial until RCSo vmtiliton was Ontario, o On 10111 responded to 1.111 am doe infotomy accident on Limonite at 115, Closed roadway as requestM by 511, of , Department. • On 10/12 responded m bill Inner fight (call be Tatagona at Rounar. Conducted traffic caniroland scrod In Southern California Edison for much, • On 10/13 responded is m nfourbooing traffic signals on Mission at tlndsay and Mission at gen Needs. BeMrted arefunCOon to i lD and callous for repahs, Go 10/15 rerygnded to pmr, spill almng Oubldoux at 29i°. Conducted emote uoonol and bill athembeni to rempve uAnI ace from roadway. C of tempt Valcay1y111I CAY 1l' ftIICv'iiSratYvar2014-150ttobar ProfirnsRefv`t Page 115 14 MEMO City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Ken Rukavina, PE, QSD City Engineer Education / Registration / Certification Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Bachelor of Science, Meteorology Registered Civil Engineer, CA #42866 California Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) 601047 Y overseen Design ana construction oT yAUU ivunion In Public Improvements ✓ City Engineer, 6 Southern California Cities ✓ Supervising Engineer, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Ken brings unique perspective, vision, and value to both large and small-scale municipal projects. Due to his many years of city engineering experience, he understands the issues local public officials face on a daily basis along with the insight to see all sides of complex coordination challenges with utility companies, neighboring cities, transportation agencies, Caltrans, railroads, property owners and others. Ken's project experience spans the gamut of the following types of projects: Street Reconstruction a Street Widening Intersection Capacity Enhancement Overlay and Slurry Seal Landscape Improvements Medians Storm Drains Entrance Signs Right -of -Way Acquisitions Water Quality BM Ps Storm Drain & Sewer Master Plans Park Improvements * Sewers and Waterlines Traffic Signals City Engineering, City of Rosemead, CA. Deputy City Engineer and City Engineer/ Director of Public Works for 17 years responsible for running the day to day operations and decision making of the City's engineering and public works department as well as implementing an annual capital improvement program, ranging between $5 million and $10 million. Primary tasks included project planning/management; public relations for City's public works projects; preparation of Council staff reports, resolutions, ordinances and report writing; liaison with traffic engineer and traffic commission; capital improvement program budgets preparation; oversight of preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates; construction observation/administration; oversight and management the City's maintenance contracts (road, traffic signals, signing and striping); funding application preparation, processing, and invoicing; development review and subdivision (tentative and final map) processing; plan checking; and water quality management. City Engineering, Cities of Lakewood, Rolling Hills Estates, Bellflower, Temple City, and Lawndale, CA. City Engineer responsible for running the day to day operations and decision making of the City's engineering and public works department as well as implementing an annual CIP program. Engineering and Plan Review, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, CA. Supervising Engineer responsible for directing the activities of drainage and grading plan checkers in the Land Development Division. In Road Maintenance District 1, supervised engineering personnel responsible for the development of plans and specifications for various County street projects. Performed contract administration for the County's flood control facilities while assigned to the Construction Division, and prepared hydrology and drainage studies during his tenure in the Hydraulics Division. rem... 15'��,Ex City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Federal/State Funding Administration, Various Agencies, Southern California. Provided oversight and assistance to numerous cities at various stages of the federal/state-funded process as follows: Call for Projects applications, FTIP Programming, Field Review, Preliminary Environmental Study (PES), Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction, Award Submittal, Labor Compliance, Progress Invoicing, and Final Report of Expenditures. The various federal and state funding programs have included STP, SR2S, ARRA, HBP (HBRR), and HSIP (HES). La Pata Avenue Gap Closure and Camino Del Rio Extension, County of Orange, CA. Project Manager for the preparation of PS&E and right-of-way documents. This 3.7 mile, $72 million roadway project bisects the Prima Deshecha Landfill and will eliminate an existing gap in the Orange County arterial highway system, with a connection between Ortega Highway and the City of San Clemente. The project includes the widening and rehabilitation of the existing roadway and new roadway through mountainous terrain, construction of landscaped medians, multiple water quality basins, nearly 10 million yards of earth moving, four grade separations, relocation of SDG&E transmission towers, and environmental mitigation measures. Palos Verdes Drive West - Soldier Pile Wall, City of Palos Verdes Estates, CA. Project Manager for the repair of Palos Verdes Drive West and design of a 300 foot soldier pile caisson wall to protect the road from an active landslide. Provided oversight for research and review of existing utilities, preparing the site plan, civil plans, cost estimate, and specifications. Construction Manager overseeing construction observation and administration services, as well as managing the geotechnical subconsultant who provided specialty inspection and test services. Monitored preparation of daily logs of construction activities, met with the contractor to resolve issues, worked closely with City staff to help keep the project on schedule, and supported the Caltrans audit performed for the expenditure of ARRA funds. Garvey Avenue Bridge, City of Rosemead, CA. As City Engineer, responsible for replacing the Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio Hondo Channel, which involved extensive coordination with federal, state, and local agencies. The new $11 million bridge is 420 feet long and 100 feet wide, with only three piers in the channel. As the City desired a signature bridge to serve as a gateway to the community, historic features of the old bridge were recreated and decorative lighting and monuments were incorporated into the design. The bridge serves as an entrance statement into the City. Worked closely with Caltrans to obtain federal funding and environmental clearance, and with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to obtain approval of the hydraulic analysis and civil/structural plans as a prerequisite for obtaining the necessary encroachment permits from each agency. Provided oversight of the construction management team. Engineering Services for the Rosedale Master Planned Community Project, City of Azusa, CA. Principal -in -Charge and provided a range of city engineering services specific to the Rosedale project, a master planned community of 1,200 new homes to be developed on the former Monrovia Nursery site. Oriented around an active village core and recreation center, Rosedale included a series of neighborhoods with parks, a new K-8 school, fire station, Metrolink Gold Line Station, and 200 acres of permanently preserved natural hillsides. Engineering services provided included subdivision map checking, public improvement plan review, coordination of consultant activities, other agencies and utility services, preparation of staff reports, and attendance at City Council and Commission meetings. 16 SA City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Steve Loriso, PE, QSD Project Manager Education / Registration / Certification Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Registered Civil Engineer, CA #64701 Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), CA# 00503 17+ Years Municipal Engineering and Construction Management Project/Construction Management of Diverse Infrastructure Projects Steve has nearly 20 years of design, CIP program management, design management, plan review, NPDES/water quality compliance, and construction management experience of municipal public improvement projects, including roads, drainage, water, sewer, traffic, grading, and parking lots. He has served 20+ cities, including Pomona, Corona, Norco, Monrovia, Walnut, San Gabriel, Claremont, Chino, and Indio. Steve has managed the implementation of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit for various municipalities; performed review of compliance documents for private and public developments, and acted as the owner's representative. Municipal Engineering, City of Walnut, CA. Deputy City Engineer responsible for preparing City's Capital Improvement budget, overseeing the design and construction of all capital projects, plan checking of land development projects, and assessment engineering. Program Management, City of Pomona, CA. Contract Program Manager for City's Utility Services Department responsible for the design and construction of various sewer and water projects. Handled project analysis, RFP preparation/evaluation, project coordination, and City Council award and advertisement of bid packages. South Campus Drive Improvement, City of Pomona, CA. Project Manager for $2.5 million street reconstruction project (Temple Avenue to Ridgeway Street). The existing roadway pavement, consisting of nearly 10 acres of asphalt surface, was originally designed for low traffic volumes, but had deteriorated due to the expanding adjacent California State University, Pomona which generated high traffic volumes. Project was rehabilitated using a Full Depth Reclamation pavement strategy. Recycled Water Pipeline, Inland Empire Utilities Agency/City of Chino, CA. Project Manager for "jack and bore" design of 250 L.F. of 30 inch diameter ductile iron pipe under heavily travelled Euclid Avenue. Valley Boulevard Street Rehabilitation, City of Walnut, CA. Project Manager for design, construction management, contract administration, and labor compliance of one mile of road reconstruction and widening, including removal and replacement of existing asphalt concrete pavement, construction of center median, curb, gutter, sidewalk, bus turnouts, and traffic signal improvements. Project required extensive coordination between the Cities of Walnut and Industry, and the County of Los Angeles. Public Works Maintenance Facility, City of San Gabriel, CA. Program Manager for development and construction of a new $7.1 million Public Works Maintenance Facility to accommodate the Police Department's expansion. The project was separated into two phases of construction - rough grading of an existing trash transfer facility and the final facility construction. Varner Road Street Improvements, City of Indio, CA. Project Manager for street improvement and widening involving the design and construction management of one mile of frontage road parallel to Interstate 10 as well as drainage, signing and striping, and right-of-way acquisition. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Jim Smith, PE Special Projects Advisor Education / Registration Masters, Business Administration Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Registered Civil Engineer, CA #142977 ✓ Extensive On -Site Staff Augmentation Experience ✓ Public Works Director/City Engineer, 10 Southern California Cities For nearly 30 years Jim has served as Public Works Director/City Engineer for nearly 10 Southern California cities. He has established design and construction standards for capital projects, reducing overall public construction costs 20%; analyzed and implemented municipal information management systems; guided the preparation of grant applications for capital projects, realizing subsequent revenues in excess of $3 million per year from external sources; administered multi-year Capital Improvement Programs, completing municipal improvements for large projects totaling in excess of $800 million; planned and organized special ballot elections, generating annual revenues for parks, landscaping, police services, street lighting, and other infrastructure; and negotiated engineering and real property contracts for agencies. Jim is recognized for his "big -picture' approach to maximize alternative financing (e.g., bonds, grants, development impact fees, special districts, etc.) that fund capital projects to enhance the quality of life, public safety, mobility, and recreation. He conceptualizes projects that can be leveraged beyond filling basic operations and maintenance needs to generate greater value to constituents. Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City ofJurupa Valley, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration; the overview and approval for transportation, land development, and maintenance activities, interfacing with state, federal, and County agencies for project approvals, entitlements, and cooperative agreements; and special district formation and administration (e.g., CFDs, LLMDs, etc.). Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Placentia, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Oversaw $6.5 million in street rehabilitation improvements citywide through gas tax funding. Public Works Director, City of San Bernardino, CA. Interim Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. A primary focus was to identify cost-saving opportunities. Saved $2 million/year by diverting the hauling of waste to regional landfills. This was accomplished by establishing agreements with waste management companies to haul waste to local material re -use facilities. Money was saved by shorter haul trips, recycling of some material, and avoidance of landfill fees. City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Indio, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Was at City for five years during period of $3 billion economic growth and doubling of population. Coordinated preparation of $500 million Development Impact Fee, oversaw construction of community buildings (e.g., city hall, teen center, community center). Increased water tank storage from 6 to 70 million gallons. Oversaw citywide street rehabilitation and improvements to Highway 111, involving drainage facilities, roadway widening, and congestion relief elements. Secured $10 million in grant funding through RCTC, ISTEA, and CVAG sources/programs. Also, oversaw the design and construction of the 1-10/Jefferson Street Interchange. City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Yorba Linda, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, land development, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Oversaw construction of $25 million Black Gold Golf Club and adjacent 2,100 unit development. Golf course generates $2 million annually in net income to General Fund. Also, secured $27 million in regional funding sources to construct four -mile long Imperial Highway project. City Engineer, City of Garden Grove, CA. City Engineer responsible for CIP project administration, land development, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Expansion of Disney facilities brought extensive development street improvements to area, including construction of 10,000 hotel rooms and Harbor Boulevard Corridor and Beautification Enhancement. Secured $10 million to fund these streetscape enhancements. Sat on Orange County Flood Control Advisory Committee and obtained $8 million in grant funding to widen and improve the Bolsa Chica Channel, thereby eliminating flooding in the immediate area. Sat on the State Route 22 Advisory Committee tasked with recommendations to widen the freeway, interchange improvements, and addition of auxiliary lanes. Was instrumental in shepherding these improvements while avoiding the elimination of revenue producing properties, such as the Auto Mall, adjacent to SR 22. Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Norwalk, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Focused on coordinating City's interests associated with the 1-5 widening and proposed high-speed train to Anaheim. Attended Caltrans and MTA meetings to coordinatel-5 widening project approvals. Contract City Engineer/Public Works Director, City of Calimesa, CA. City Engineer/Public Works Director responsible for CIP project administration, land development, permit counter support, and multi -agency and stakeholder coordination. Coordinated permitting and approvals for large development projects north of 1-10 homes and associated infrastructure tied to City facilities. Municipal Management / Engineering, City of Moreno Valley, CA. Deputy City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director/Capital Projects Manager responsible for managing all facets of $95 million, 5 -year CIP program. Formed and administered special districts. Hired and managed various consultants to successfully deliver the CIP program. Land Development, Southern California. Managed design and construction of master planned communities for Landmark, a large developer of mixed-use, master planned communities and golf course, such as Moreno Valley Ranch, PGA West, and Oak Valley. 19 >'SI �4JC �c�pp � aB.B City of Lake Elsinore Professional Engineering Staffing for Delivery of Capital Improvement Projects Fee Schedule The following proposed fee schedule reflects proposed staffing hours payable on an hourly basis which will be billed monthly to the City up to but not exceeding $30,000. Personnel Classification Hourly Rate City Engineer $165 Project Manager $160 Special Projects Advisor $ 170 Subject to written direction by the City Manager, HR Green also proposes to conduct project construction management and inspection services for projects assigned at a fee of 10 percent of the total construction project cost. This action is subject to approval of the City of Lake Elsinore Mayor and City Council 20� HRGreen.com Phone 714.287.2275 Email gwentz@hrgreen.com 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1025 Orange, CA 92868 tsl� Ilii">I;i; Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 9) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-552 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 CITY OF LADE , LSII`IORE V� DREAM EXI'RGME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Proposal for the City of Lake Elsinore to renew their Wildland Fire Protection Aareement with Cal Fire. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement with Cal Fire in the final form as approved by the City Attorney, Discussion To protect the city from unfunded liabilities in the event of a wildland fire within the city that is not covered by a MTZ (Mutual Threat Zone). These costs are for Cal -Fire or other resources that may be needed to control a wildland fire including but not limited to aircraft, crews, dozers, engines and logistics. These costs could easily reach tens of thousands of dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. The cost is based on what the state currently pays to protect its SRA (State Responsibility Area) lands. Current cost per acre is approximately $ 25.96 ($23.06 + 12.59% administrative charge) per acre. The proposed agreement for the City of Lake Elsinore is for 1689 acres at an annual cost of $43,851.94. Cal Fire would then treat the area covered by the agreement as well as areas in the MTZ (Mutual Threat Zone) as SRA lands. (This is virtually all of the WUI Wildland Urban Interface Area in the city.) This means that Cal Fire would bear the cost of suppressing wildland fires in these areas using any needed resources to accomplish this task. The city would only expend its budgeted cost annually to maintain the agreement with Cal Fire. The cost per acre is reviewed and adjusted annually to reflect the current cost of protection per acre. The area covered by the agreement can also be adjusted to reflect build up or annexations. This agreement has been reduced by 528 acres and $5,879.33 from the current agreement This was possible because of development in railroad canyon area. This is a cost effective way for the City of Lake Elsinore to protect itself from potentially crippling unbudgeted expense from a wildland fire(s) and provide a fiscally prudent level of protection to its citizens and natural resources. Prepared By: Mark Barr Fire Chief Approved By: Jason P. Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachment: Map of Propose area to be covered by the agreement 3 C- 0 -1-a l^U1f W 0 L— n n W L 0 .' ^ W N N N 0 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 10) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-553 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Consent Agenda File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 412312015 CITY OF .mac LAKE �LSII` OKE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: CINCO DE MAYO EVENT APPROVAL FOR MUNICIPAL CODE WAIVER RECOMMENDATION City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. BACKGROUND The City of Lake has received an application from Gloria Jimenez to offer the annual Cinco De Mayo Harley Davidson Motorcycle Event in the Seaport Parking Lot on Sunday, May 3, 2015. This event has run since 2012 formerly known as the "2nd Sundays" event where attendees listen to live local bands, enjoy food and entertainment booths. This year, they are requesting to add a beer and wine garden. Alcohol sales will cease one hour prior to the end of the event. EI Unico will be catering the event and has an environmental health permit. DISCUSSION The Sherriff, Fire, Public Works, Risk Management and Community Services Departments have met with the applicant and Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. CINCO DE MAYO EVENT APRIL 28, 2015 Page 2 Organizers are requesting a waiver of LEMC Section 9.28.030 (Furnishing alcoholic beverages in public). The beer and wine garden will be located in a centralized area and is required to have approved appropriate security measures in place for monitoring the garden during the entire event. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant is responsible for costs associated with Sheriff, Fire and City staff involvement with the event and will make arrangements for complete payments as prescribed in the Conditions of Approval prior to complete approval. The organizers are expecting revenue from vendor sales to compensate for overall costs. Prepared by: Johnathan O. Skinner Director of Community Services Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org itl�_:.( tSII7t lKi, Text File File Number: ID# 14-554 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 11) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 CITY OF LADE 0LS11JOKE ZWDREAM EXTREMrn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk DATE: April 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1334 Recommendation It is recommended that City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1334 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN STREET Discussion The above -referenced Ordinance approving Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of April 14, 2015, and is now being presented for second reading and adoption by title only. Prepared by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance No. 2014-1334 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1334 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN STREET WHEREAS, Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-02 (SPA 2014-01) to the Spyglass Specific Plan (the "Project'); and WHEREAS, the 259 -acre project site is generally located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street; and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007-01 (SCH No. 2006121069) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the development of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan EIR; and WHEREAS, a "Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California", dated June 2014 (the "Report') was prepared by John Minch and Associates to provide additional analysis regarding the Delaney Ranch Complex, also known as the "Tarzan House"; and WHEREAS, the Report was conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that because "none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no adverse impacts to historic resources"; therefore "no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout'; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval or denial of a specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014-1334 PAGE 2 OF 5 WHEREAS, on September 2, 2014 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-13 recommending that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 (SPA 2014-01) is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.. SECTION 2. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of Addendum #1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01, the CEQA documents, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: 1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, dated June 2014 and prepared by John Minch and Associates, constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014-1334 PAGE 3 OF 5 2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines. 3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Initial Study have occurred; specifically: SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 (SPA 2014-01): 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et seg. of the California Government Code and Section 17.204 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well -integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. Approval of the Project will allow the demolitions of the existing structures found on a 0.4 acre site known as Planning Area 3. Planning Area 7 & Planning Area 13 will be combined and developed into an approximately 6.5 acres of park. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated that will result from implementation of Amendment No. 1 of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan has been reviewed and accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit and bicycle. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014-1334 PAGE 4 OF 5 4. Amendment No. 1 of the Spyglass Specific Plan identifies methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by the Municipal Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. The Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Specific Plan identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. The amendment will allow removal of structures that have been experiencing ongoing vandalism making these structures a health and safety issue. The applicant/developer shall develop an approximately 6.5 acres park within the combined Planning Area 7 & Planning Area 13, thus centralizing the park area that will be utilized for active recreation purposes. 5. The overall design of Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 (SPA 2014-01) will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 (SPA 2014-01) allows for the demolition of structures that have been vandalized to the point of being detrimental to the health and safety of the City. The applicant/developer shall develop an approximately 6.5 acres park within the combined Planning Area 7 & Planning Area 13. In addition, staff has substantiated that all applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the Amendment No 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan and have incorporated all applicable comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a less than significant level, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014-1334 PAGE 5 OF 5 On February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the development of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan area. (SCH No. 2006121069) In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, dated June 2014 and prepared by John Minch and Associates, constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council hereby approves Spyglass Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 (SPA 2014-01). SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. APPROVED AND INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of April, 2015; and Adopted at the regular City Council meeting of April 28, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elsinore.org ---------,�,t_ Text File File Number: ID# 14-555 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 12) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 CITY or. LADE C LSII` ORO DRFhNA riTRLtitF„ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates, City Manager DATE: April 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1335 Regarding Public Skate Park Facilities Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1335, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 8.42 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PUBLIC SKATE PARK FACILITIES. Background Skate parks are becoming an increasingly common amenity in many communities. The City currently maintains and operates one public skate park facility at McVicker Canyon Park where in-line skaters, roller skaters, BMX riders and skateboarders are welcome. This year, the City plans to open its second public skate park facility at Serenity Park. The project is currently under design and is planned for completion in June 2015. On April 14, 2015, an ordinance was introduced to establish a comprehensive set of rules and regulations for the use of these facilities to enhance the user experience, reduce the potential for injury, and take advantage of certain immunities accorded public agencies. The ordinance establishes rules along with consequences for violations by a skate park participant. The new municipal code also satisfies the State's requirements that skate park operators require the wearing of helmets, elbow pad and knee pads, which in turn provides certain critical immunities to a public agency operating a skate park. In the absence of operator supervision, a public skate park must include signage reciting the rules and regulations specified in the ordinance. The proposed ordinance was previously presented and approved by the Public Safety Advisory Commission. Ordinance Regarding Public Skate Park Facilities April 28, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Discussion At the meeting of April 14, 2015, two primary areas of concern were presented by the City Council for further consideration. First, there was a question regarding the use of the skate park by both skaters and BMX bikes. At this time, the park would be open for roller skates, in-line skates, scooters, skateboards, and BMX bikes. Second, concerns were expressed about the proposed age restrictions. California Health & Safety Code section 115800 and Government Code section 831.7 provide public entities with certain immunities from liability arising out of a person's participation in a "hazardous recreational activity." Skateboarding at a public skate park is considered a "hazardous recreational activity" if certain conditions are met. To meet these conditions for immunity from liability, the skateboarder must be 12 years of age or older and using a "stunt, trick, or luge skateboard." This is a requirement for the immunity only; state law does not mandate that the City adopt an age restriction. However, if a boarder is younger than 12, the immunity from liability under these state law provisions would not apply to that injured boarder regardless of whether the City requires such young boarder to be supervised or not. Staff's recommendation is to leave the existing ordinance language that all children under 12 years of age who wish to utilize a public skate park facility must be accompanied by an adult in order to encourage adult supervision of underage skateboarders and thereby mitigate the risk of injury. The proposed rules outlined in the ordinance will be posted clearly on signage at skate parks to encourage adult supervision of those under the age of 12. Therefore, no substantial revisions have been made to the ordinance as introduce and it is now being presented for the second reading and adoption as part of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Prepared by: Nicole Dailey, Management Analyst Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance No. 2015-1335 regarding Public Skate Park Facilities ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1335 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTION CHAPTER 8.42 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PUBLIC SKATE PARK FACILITIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 8.42 is hereby added to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code as follows: Chapter 8.42 PUBLIC SKATE PARK FACILITIES 8.42.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a comprehensive set of rules and regulations for the use of public skate park facilities in the City of Lake Elsinore. 8.42.020 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms, phrases, words, and derivations shall have the meaning given in this section: "BMX bike" means a bicycle with a stout frame, knobby tires, and 20 -inch wheels, typically used for racing on such a dirt track and for performing tricks. "Department" means the City of Lake Elsinore Department of Community Services. "Director" means the Director of the City of Lake Elsinore Department of Community Services or his or her designee. "Public skate park facility" means any facility, structure or area in which skateboarding, in-line skating and roller skating is permitted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, which is owned by the City, and which has been designated as a "public skate park facility" by the City. "Roller skates " or "in-line skates" means any shoe, boot or other footwear to which one or more wheels are attached. "Scooter" means any device that has at least two wheels with a low foot board between the wheels that is steered by a handlebar and is propelled by pushing one foot against the ground while resting the other on the foot board. 1 "Skateboard" means any platform of any composition or size to which two or more wheels are attached and which is intended to be ridden or propelled by one or more persons standing or kneeling upon it and to which there is not affixed any seat or any other device or mechanism to turn and control the wheels. 8.42.030 Rules and Regulations. A. All skaters must skate safely and responsibly. No skater may enter a public skate park facility when it is already being used to capacity. When skaters are waiting to enter, a time limit of 20 minutes per person shall be imposed. B. Persons participating in recreational activities at a public skate park facility or other areas designated by the City Council for activities, which include the use of skateboards, in-line skates or roller skates shall wear the following safety equipment at all times: helmet with fastened safety strap, elbow pads and knee pads. Those using skateboards or in-line scooters must wear shoes (no bare feet or sandals). C. All children under 12 years of age who wish to utilize a public skate park facility must be accompanied by an adult (18 or older). Non -skater shall not enter the park unless accompanying an underage child. D. The hours of the operation for a public skate park facility will be posted at each Public skate park facility. Any person attempting to use a public skate park facility during any other time shall be subject to immediate ejectment, in addition to any other penalties provided in this chapter. E. Public skate park facilities are for roller skates, in-line skates, scooters, skateboards, and BMX bikes. Any other use is not permitted in or on a public skate park facility whatsoever. No moveable obstacles or outside materials (e.g. ramps/jumps) are allowed in the park. F. Use of profanity, abusive language, violence and/or weapons is prohibited and shall result in automatic expulsion from a public skate park facility. G. Skating is not permitted when surfaces are wet, icy or slippery. H. No alcohol, drugs, smoking, glass containers, food or drink is permitted within a public skate park facility. Skating is also not permitted while being under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs. I. Loud music or excessive noise shall not be permitted at a public skate park facility. J. No person shall enter in or on a public skate park facility with an animal. 2 K. The Director may set forth any other rules and regulations for the use of a public skate park facility which he or she deems appropriate, provided that signs describing such rules and regulations are placed and posted pursuant to Section 8.42.040. 8.42.040 Signage and Posting Requirement. In order to provide reasonable notice to the public, the Director shall place and post signs in one or more conspicuous and visible area(s) of the skate park facility designating the facility, structure or area as a public skate park facility. The sign shall also specify the rules and regulations established pursuant to this chapter and prohibiting the activities described in this chapter. The signs required pursuant to this section shall cite the respective code section being invoked and list a method for reporting violations should they occur 8.42.050 Hazardous Recreational Activity. The use of any public skate park facility shall be deemed a hazardous recreational activity within the meaning of California Government Code Section 831.7. The City of Lake Elsinore may not be held liable for injuries incurred by persons who participate in any such hazardous recreational activity. 8.42.060 Enforcement. The Director shall have the authority to eject and expel from any public skate park facility any person who is in violation of this chapter. Any person failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to citation or other applicable enforcement authority available to the City. SECTION 2. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this Ordinance to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance and are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. 3 PASSED, A Council of the City 2015, and adopted California, on the ATTEST: PPROVED, AND INTRODUCED of Lake Elsinore, California, on the at a regular meeting of the City C _ day of , 2015. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Zeid Leibold, City Attorney at a regular meeting of the City day of ouncil of the City of Lake Elsinore, Mayor Steve Manos City of Lake Elsinore City Council 0 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 13) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-556 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elseore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City o(Lake Elsinore Page 9 Printed on 4/23/2095 CITY of, LAKE LSINORE [ IUAM Ej{FRF':Mrn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: BUENAS VIBRAS FESITVAL DE MUSICA APPROVAL FOR MUNICIPAL CODE WAIVER RECOMMENDATION 1. City Council Waive Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages in Public. BACKGROUND The City of Lake has received an application from EJP International, Inc. to offer a two- day concert on the beach area of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch on August 15 and 16, 2015. The event (Buenas Vibras Festival De Musica), is a music festival of Latin Music, food and entertainment booths and beer and wine locations on the beach area west of the Boat Launch. Local businesses are being contacted to supply food and other services during the festival. Previously, EJP International (formerly Good Vibes Concerts) held a similar two-day festival in the same venue February 2014. Surrounding campgrounds have been notified about the festival. DISCUSSION The Sherriff's Department, Fire Department, Public Works Department and Community Services Department have met with the applicant (EJP International, Inc.) to address concerns with the previous event held in 2014. The applicant is in the process of meeting all Conditions of Approval set forth by the City prior to deadlines. BUENAS VIBRAS FESTIVAL DE MUSICA APRIL 28, 2015 Page 2 Organizers are requesting a waiver of LEMC Section 9.28.030 (Furnishing alcoholic beverages in public). Beer and wine gardens are to be located throughout the venue and are required to have approved appropriate security measures in place for monitoring gardens during the entire festival. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant has received costs associated with Police, Fire and City staff involvement with the festival will make arrangements for complete payments as prescribed in the Conditions of Approval prior to complete approval. The organizers are expecting ticket and vendor sales to compensate for overall costs. Prepared by: Johnathan O. Skinner Director of Community Services Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager r rti�}. � hth{1ri.i1 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 14) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-557 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Business File Type: Report City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 CITY OF iih LADE L LSIN.OIZE 'M DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: April 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Citv Council Update on Revisions to the Weed Abatement Policv Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction for the FY 2015-16 Weed Abatement Program. Background The City of Lake Elsinore Weed Abatement Program was introduced in 1987 as a method of controlling the fire hazard posed by the presence of dry weeds, in addition to addressing issues of landscape aesthetics. Through cooperative partnerships with agencies such as AQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board, and active participation by property owners, the Lake Elsinore Weed Abatement Program has continued as a vital City operation. In December 2013, in response to NPDES concerns, City staff entertained the idea of prohibiting the use of discing as a Weed Abatement method. The concern at that time was that discing, if not done properly, could lead to pollutants and sediment being discharged into the lake in addition to causing fugitive dust, which would raise air quality control issues. In 2014, the City's Weed Abatement Guidelines prohibited discing after September 30 of each year in an effort to minimize dirt and nutrients being carried to the lake during the rainy season. The 2015 Weed Abatement Guidelines prohibit discing altogether. The Guidelines include the following explanation: WHY PROHIBIT DISCING? Discing disrupts the natural erosion control provided by plants and their roots allowing dirt and nutrients to be carried from the property by rain and wind, ultimately ending up in the lake. Nutrients are one of the primary causes in the lake's nuisance algae blooms. The discing prohibition is just one of many actions the City has taken to reduce nutrients in the lake; others include limiting nutrients from new development in the watershed to the maximum extent practicable, lake aeration, and lake -level stabilization. These actions are necessary if the City is to meet the federal/state water quality target for nutrients in Lake Elsinore required by the California EPA State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). City Council Update on Revisions To the Weed Abatement Policy April 28, 2015 Page 2 On April 14, 2015, the City Council held a Public Hearing for Consideration of Objections to The City's Weed Abatement Program, at which time City land and business owners raised concerns about the change in policy. Specific areas of public concern included: potential hazards related to mowing; lack of a variance procedure for land that is not suitable for mowing; potential for non-compliance due to time constraints and extensions of the deadline; and the levying of unnecessary fines for new growth. Discussion Safety of the citizens of the City of Lake Elsinore is of utmost importance. The Weed Abatement Program and implementing Guidelines are aimed at ensuring and protecting public health and safety, including mitigating fire hazards as well as protecting air and water quality. It is not the intent of the City to impose unnecessary hardship on property owners. City Ordinance No. 1135, Section 8.32.035 allows the Superintendent of Public Works (defined for purposes of the Ordinance as the Director of Community Services) to prepare the program's guidelines. Changes regarding discing were implemented for the reasons discussed above. Based upon direction provided by City Council on April 14, 2015 the plan is as follows: 1. Weed Abatement and Code Enforcement staff have been directed not to enforce the prohibition on discing. 2. Notice will be posted on the City's website informing the public of the City Council's action to allow discing during the current weed abatement season. 3. Property owners will be given written notice of the change to the Weed Abatement Guidelines allowing discing. 4. An automatic extension, from May 2, 2015 to June 2, 2015 will be given to landowners to provide adequate time for compliance. 5. Staff will communicate any future changes made to the Guidelines and/or policies to the City Manager and City Council in a timely manner. In the coming months, City staff will re-evaluate the City's Weed Abatement Program (Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Weed and Rubbish Abatement) and current policies and guidelines. Revisions will be proposed consistent with City Council discussion and presented to the City Council for consideration at a later date. In all areas of business it is the City's goal to achieve and maintain complete transparency, and the Weed Abatement program is no exception. The revised guidelines will provide: clear direction to property owners; a simplified table of applicable fees and penalties, and instruction on the specific steps citizens can take to address City Council Update on Revisions To the Weed Abatement Policy April 28, 2015 Page 3 concerns. In order to comply with AQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control the City's Weed Abatement policy will require landowners to apply water prior to discing and to stabilize the disked surface after cessation of weed abatement activities. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Public Works Director Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Weed Abatement Ordinance No. 1135 Weed Abatement Guidelines Weed Abatement Notice ORDINANCE NO. 1135 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.32 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING WEED AND RUBBISH ABATEMENT WHEREAS, Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code establishes the procedures for weed and rubbish abatement for'the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, it is the purpose and intent of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore to amend and restate Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code in order to enhance fire prevention practices and eliminate public nuisances in the City of Lake Elsinore; and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That Subsection B. of Section 8.32.010 of Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code is hereby redesignated as Subsection C. of Section 8.32.010. That Subsection B. of Section 8.32.010 of Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code is hereby added as follows: B. "Rubbish, refuse and dirt" includes unused or discarded matter having no substantial market value, which is exposed to the elements and is not enclosed by any structure or otherwise consist of such matter as trash, rubble, asphalt, and accumulated dirt from other sites or for which there is no City approved grading permit. That Subsection D. of Section 8.32.0 10 of Chapter 8.32 of the Lake F,lsinore Municipal Code is hereby added as follows: D. "Superintendent of Public Works" means the Director of Community Services or designee. That Subsection C. of Section 8.32.0 10 of Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code is hereby redesignated as Subsection E. of Section 8.32.010, and is hereby amended to add as follows: 6. Any accumulation of dry grasses or other flammable vegetation within fifty (50) feet of any above ground flammable liquid. 7. Trees, if determined to increase the fire hazard, due to mortality, insect infestation, disease, or lack of maintenance. SECTION 2: That Section 8.32.035 is hereby added to Chapter 8.32 oftheLake Elsinore Municipal Code as follows: 8.32.035 'Weed Abatement Guidelines The Superintendent of Public Works shall prepare weed abatement guidelines to assist property owners in meeting the requirements of this chapter. Such guidelines shall be available to the public at no charge. SECTION 3: That Section 8.32.040, within the second sentence, the words "same calendar year" are hereby deleted and such deleted words are replaced as follows: "within the one year period following adoption of the resolution as provided in this chapter" SECTION 4: That Section 8.32.055 is hereby added to Chapter 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code as follows: 8.32.055 Recurrent Rubbish — Abatement Notice At the time it adopts the resolution. as provided in this chapter, the City Council may also find and declare that rubbish, refuse and dirt on specified parcels of property are recurrent nuisances. Such recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, provided that upon the second and any subsequent occurrence of such nuisance on the same parcel or parcels within the same one year period, no further hearings need be held and it shall be sufficient to mail a postcard notice to the owner of the property as they and their addresses appear upon the current assessment roll. The notice shall refer to and describe the property and shall state that rubbish, refuse and dirt of a recurrent nature are present on the property and that same constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by removal of such rubbish, refuse and dirt, and that otherwise they will be removed and the nuisance will be abated by City authorities, in which case the cost of such removal shall be assessed upon the parcel and lands from which or in front of which such rubbish, refuse and dirt are removed and that, upon confirmation, such cost will constitute a fine upon such parcel or lands until paid. SECTION 4: SEVERABILITY If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance and are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 5: NOTICE OF ADOPTION The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of the Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of the Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, UPON FIRST READING this 14 day of December , 2004, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER BUCKLEY NONE NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28_ day of December , 20014, by the following toll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS I hi Vicki Kasad, City Clerk AS TO City Attorney 3 BUCKLEY, HTCKMAN, KELLEY, SCHIFFNER, MAGEE NONE NONE NONE Ma or STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE) I, VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and read by title only on the 14t" day of December, 2004, and presented for second reading by title only for adoption on the 280 day of December, 2004, and approved, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE NONE VICKI KASAD, CITY CLrn CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE) I, VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 1135 of said Council, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. 30, 2004 VICKI KASAD, CITY CLEF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (SEAL) CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Weed Abatement Guidelines The mission of the City of Lake Elsinore's weed abatement program is for the annual removal of combustible fuel such as weeds, brush, dead trees and rubbish from unimproved property within the city limits, including abatement of nuisances such as fill dirt and debris from illegal dumping, through the cooperation of affected property owners according to standards in the Municipal code. The following are the City of Lake Elsinore's weed abatement guidelines. These guidelines shall apply to all vacant and unimproved lots throughout the year, including those lots with vacant structures. All Properties Includes any alley, parkway strip, or unimproved public easement abutting the property. • Remove all rubbish, trash, trimmings, litter, tires and combustible waste material. • Disc, mow or weed -whack all weeds, grass, brush, or other combustible vegetation according to the guidelines below. • Pick up and dispose of grass and other cuttings after mowing, hoeing, or weed -whacking. • Remove all sagebrush, chaparral, tumbleweeds, and any other brush or weeds which attain such large growth as to become, when dry, a fire menace to adjacent improved property. • Tumbleweeds shall be removed from the property on a year-round basis. • All weeds shall be cut to a maximum of 3 inches in height on all parcels. Guidelines • All disc work shall be confined to the lot interior and away from streets, sidewalks and water's edge. It shall be completed so that all weeds, grass, crops or other vegetation or organic material which could be expected to burn shall be substantially turned over so there is insufficient fuel to sustain or allow the spread of fire. (for Lake front properties, see below) • Handwork, including mowing and weed -eating shall be used to remove weeds along fence lines and adjacent to the sidewalk and/or street (lot border) and water's edge to create an erosion control barrier. • As per AQMD Rule 403, all areas to be disced must be watered prior to the start of work to keep dust to a minimum. • Lake front properties: Beginning at water's edge, mow or weed -whack first 20-25 feet. The remaining balance of the lot up to the road/sidewalk may be mowed, weed -whacked or disced. EXAMPLES Street Sidewalk LOT INTERIOR: Mow / Disc / Weed -whack WATER'S EDGE LOT BORDER: Mow / Weed- whack • 5 ft. border for Flat lots 10 ft. border for Sloped lots Adjacent to street /sidewalk /channels Mow or weed - whack 20-25 ft wide strip adjacent to water's edge. Parcels Over Ten (10) Acres • In lieu of abating the entire parcel, firebreaks may be used in such a manner that no single area shall exceed five (5) acres. Firebreaks shall be a continuous 100—foot wide strip of land which is clear of all combustible weeds, grass, stubble, rubbish, or other material which would allow the travel of fire. Firebreaks may include fire -resistive vegetation, such as irrigated crops, ice plant, and any other live plants recognized by the City of Lake Elsinore as being fire -resistive. If parcel is at a 45 degree slope, see additional guidelines below. • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreaks around all combustible structures. • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreaks along each side of all roadways • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreak along each side of all fences, property lines, ditches and creeks. • Remove any and all trash and illegal dumping. • Remove from trees any dead or overgrown branches within eight (8) feet from the ground. • Remove dead palm fronds. Parcels On A 45 Degree Slope • Any parcels that are sloped up to 45 degrees will need to mow or weed whack to remove weeds. • Mow, weed whack or disc an area one hundred (100) feet away from any structures. • Remove all trash and illegal dumping. • Remove from trees any dead or overgrown branches within eight (8) feet from the ground. Please note that if a fire occurs due to lack of weed and debris removal, the Fire Department may charge you for the firefighting costs it incurs. Common Problems • Weeds along curbs and gutters • Weeds along fences Weeds and dirt left on sidewalks • Mounds of dirt left on parcels • Litter must be removed prior to discing/ mowing/ weed whacking Please be sure to monitor your property(s) regularly and keep them abated not only throughout the spring and summer fire season, but YEAR ROUND. NO DISCING ALLOWED AFTER SEPTEMBER 30TH EACH YEAR; only mowing and weed whacking of plant growth. THANK YOU FOR KEEPING THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SAFE AND CLEAN. ci n 01 AN-1Public Works Department/Engineering Division LANG LSI H0PQL 130 south Main street Dune PXru n r.. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 951-674-3124 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Weed Abatement Guidelines The mission of the City of Lake Elsinore's weed abatement program is for the annual removal of combustible fuel such as weeds, brush, dead trees and rubbish from unimproved property within the city limits, including abatement of nuisances such as fill dirt and debris from illegal dumping, through the cooperation of affected property owners according to standards in the Municipal code. Please note that in an effort to limit nutrients to the lake, DISCING FOR WEED ABATEMENT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED. WHY PROHIBIT DISCING? Discing disrupts the natural erosion control provided by plants and their roots allowing dirt and nutrients to be carried from the property by rain and wind, ultimately ending up in the lake. Nutrients are one of the primary causes in the lake's nuisance algae blooms. The discing prohibition is just one of many actions the City has taken to reduce nutrients in the lake; others include limiting nutrients from new development in the watershed to the maximum extent practicable, lake aeration, and lake -level stabilization. These actions are necessary if the City is to meet the federal/state water quality target for nutrients in Lake Elsinore required by the California EPA State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Your cooperation in observing the prohibition on discing and following the guidelines below is greatly appreciated. GUIDELINES These guidelines shall apply to all vacant, unimproved lots and lots with vacant structures on a Year round basisu All Properties • Includes any alley, parkway strip, or unimproved public easement abutting the property. • Remove all rubbish, trash, trimmings, litter, tires and combustible waste material. • Mow or weed -whack all weeds, grass, brush, or other combustible vegetation according to the guidelines below. — DISCING FOR WEED ABATEMENT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED. • Pick up and dispose of grass and other cuttings after mowing or weed -whacking. • Remove all sagebrush, chaparral, tumbleweeds, and any other brush or weeds which when dry can be a fire menace to adjacent improved property. • All weeds shall be cut to a maximum of 3 inches in height on all parcels. Parcels Over Ten (10) Acres • In lieu of abating the entire parcel, firebreaks may be used in such a manner that no single area shall exceed five (5) acres. Firebreaks shall be a continuous 100—foot wide strip of land which is clear of all combustible weeds, grass, stubble, rubbish, or other material which would allow the travel of fire. Firebreaks may include fire -resistive vegetation, such as irrigated crops, ice plant, and any other live plants recognized by the City of Lake Elsinore as being fire -resistive. If parcel is at a 45 degree slope, see additional guidelines below. • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreaks around all combustible structures. • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreaks along each side of all roadways • Provide 100 -foot wide firebreak along each side of all fences, property lines, ditches and creeks. • Remove from trees any dead or overgrown branches within eight (8) feet from the ground. • Remove dead palm fronds. Parcels On A 45 Degree Slope • Any parcels that are sloped up to 45 degrees will need to mow or weed whack to remove weeds. • Mow, weed whack an area one hundred (100) feet away from any structures. • Remove from trees any dead or overgrown branches within eight (8) feet from the ground. Please note that if a fire occurs due to lack of weed and debris removal, the Fire Department may charge you for the firefighting costs it incurs. EXAMPLES LOT & PARKWAY o Mow/ Weed whack o Trim trees o Remove sagebrush, chaparral, tumbleweeds, and other dry brush o Remove trash, litter, dirt piles Street ;,P�rkway Sidewalk Lot Lot Sidewalk WATER'S EDGE Pickup and — — dispose of debris Street on sidewalk & street Common Problems • Weeds along curbs and gutters • Weeds along fences • Weeds and dirt left on sidewalks Pickup and dispose of debris on sidewalk & street �'-- LOT & PARKWAY e Mow /Weed whack o Trim trees o Remove sagebrush, chaparral, tumbleweeds, and other dry brush o Remove trash, litter, dirt piles Mounds of dirt left on parcels Litter must be removed prior to mowing/ weed whacking Please be sure to monitor your property(s) regularly and keep them abated not only throughout the spring and summer fire season, but YEAR ROUND. THANK YOU FOR KEEPING THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND THE LAKE SAFE AND CLEAN. Public Works Department/Engineenng Division, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, 951-674-3124 CITY OF LADE Cog LSINORTE %`u DREAM EXTREME. February 23, 2015 «MAI L_TO_NA» sOWNER1_FIR» aOWNER1_LAS» «MAIL TO STn aMAIL_TO_CI», eMAIL_TO_ZI» Weed Abatement Program 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 INFO (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245 FAX (951) 674-8761 In Reference To Assessor's Parcel No.: aAPN»-«CHKDIGIT» **** SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR NOTICE TO DESTROY WEEDS AND REMOVE RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT **** THIS IS THE ONLY NOTIFICATION YOU WILL RECEIVE Beginning May 4, 2015, the Public Works Department will be conducting the City's annual weed abatement inspections on your property identified by the above Assessor's Parcel Number. This annual inspection is part of the City's continuing efforts to alleviate potentially dangerous fire conditions in the community in accordance with the City's Weed Abatement Program Guidelines. This inspection will determine if there is a need to destroy weeds and remove rubbish, refuse and dirt from your property. Please carefully review the enclosed Notice. The City is requesting responsible owners to alleviate these potentially hazardous conditions and maintain their property throughout the year. Beginning May 4, 2015, property not maintained in accordance with the City's Weed Abatement Program Guidelines and Chapter 8.32 of the City Municipal Code will be cleared by the City without further notice. The charges for clearing will be assessed as follows: $0.02 per square foot and a $306 administrative fee. Property owners objecting to the abatement requirements to destroy weeds and remove rubbish, refuse and unpermitted dirt piles on their property are requested to attend the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore City Council on April 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. located at the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center 183 N. Main Street, in the City of Lake Elsinore. Any objections will be heard and given due consideration by the City Council. For further information, please call the Weed Abatement Program administrator at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 245, Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Please provide your Assessor's Parcel Number when calling; it is located in the upper right corner of this letter. Sincerely, Nicole McCalmont Sr. Engineering Technician City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Text File File Number: ID# 14-558 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 15) City or Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 4/23/2015 J U z 0 U } h U O h F w O CL W w M y � N Q L � N mN 6 m O L � (6 d 7 ,O C E rtl � Z LOd r N Q rNi U f0 t6 O � D I� L y c � m � z H Z U E o ° Z Q v Q to Lo r- `m a� N — U W W o L a O 0 y 2— U Q w � °o _ Q E aF- a� OLL Oi z 5.O JU F Q j4 t� T WO mc,co o ._ WW W o Oa oo cm'�._`°iU dsom .@ c � . Q } m�— } E m N .� @ E N C Q'W N ZJ i �� m a �a� r.0 OZ o ao�m CL 0 Z Q Q' cC F- z o 3 'm -� o a> N n3 m m¢ '- SQ C7 Q 00 %q �¢=c�EMQ �¢°°'0'ai< U Sc y ?°af c oro . m o D ct°i o cq :°acEcn oaro °oma°tea O F^ mC7 s ti'rmaoiaN�a ��mU=cr_ U V Z W :o l— C/) Ucncr� 6i cjz —z _ OLL L V) Y Cl CL N ti N Q M i = Y M (6 d a .a c E fQ a z N + m N Q � L V c� 0 G L M w T L L. c0 (D a .s? E � a �z 0 0 � QT U) �M ns o— N p F- LU —W `ro 5; d Q a CL z Wo N _ C S o N V > T i— N Z O O 'Nero+% N C N N O WQ'o �or,c uE 2 �¢ 'o�?�T� o -o N w o "" N C C O d W N _o Z N Z I Y m 0 N N C O O N ._ m.0 T N t6 U a ro N .� O N N ,> O a ._ W F- N o 0 0 3 3 cu c o a ° u m N N t0 E v '3 m o a ON@.. :SON �J Np>�pT NN N RINOUN�OaQO > Z o_ �p 'c ._. -� _' N lr WO .,day_@�-No a�ooal ,yuj c m N 3�3`L)mNE C N O N N Q W r'E Z ro (O O U N ro N ro ro m ``T%Gt� d C Z C N U N o O �' �N.. N U N m T m„ C i ro ro l0 _ U ro .> O. O O �- X CV O �. c N C N N .- O N O N M J m N N N N U L. O.' Q_"' U _ 4L ,,... o ro s y c -a N _ a ro _C a 0, o 2 N c o q m Z} W 0 N G 'C N N L Cp N N C H "� ( N Li E -J U .4 N° -x m= .� o N N N p m o N r N a c N � y N N i :O N� !L N w`- W s o f- U 2' N o_.� (n cG C m U (n Q y a N 0 c �ZLrC7 c a c N °cc D- o �ou°0Cf) O U d Q m m o m m a U Q 0. Y a z ....I d a C T z w Q ar wo Q N zv � Q a� O 1 -� W p d ,n UJ F N V W Z Jao0 = N M f- J W S� z 0 aQCL N ^ O N N to 0 V N c0 E M O N Q in cOD M- LO L M @ EA L = O M (O O N M V m M O N O O O N O O) i>fL N N to d� M 6� �n N M M �-- M N 7 M C E M � z CZ O' m .N N O O O O Ito o E °. o._ _ d' o Q f- M M M O IN > M p (f7 t>Y t LO (pM m �-- N N V N M O M O N O LO O N O O �- > N LO N M y IP O rn N 7 � �.0M.0 - 0 Lo (Ij to El Q M(6 r (0 d (p ti M 100 lry L 1n M@ W z to N C) J N (0 V (fj N O V A N p t M L d f` O O d N LO M r d O E r O) N 3 N z o N o o Lo 3 Z Z 0 ---- _._._ _...__... IV M JQ 0 wEoNc N L r1Q 'O !£_-' U yu G E O U E _o O o.o - o> (D .:.� WZZ��� C N �mw WO`�WN�a Otjm c c c W Z c Z I Y m d 47 �] LL tL LL 0 U E D- U- as M 0- >- e z \ z \\ \\ z /5 m z m \ Co \ } § / / j \ LU u = e u o / / u g « z » 2 $ / j \ ^ \ \ j j z j » / / p u / /// < 5/ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ -j \ = s s s e a/¥®< e \ \ \ \ \ \ j \ j \ Q \ < / / © 2 ® 0 2 e\= 0 0 u/ / \ \ \ \ 0 0 < / < 7 7 0 a z k < \ LU \ \ j w < \ 0 m R/ z/\} \ ja j § m r e(Ij �� } \ \u \ / Cl) \ o s e e a z / ( j } \ \ < m % / UJ/2 G U) /6/ �± \ / / § \ \ ( \ \ j / / / \ < 0 / - 3 \ LL00 LU co / LL LLJ 0 0 < § / i \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 o <(L z <«umc - %= 2 e IIY Ol t �ar`L �i�StrYor�ty CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: April 28, 2015 SUBJECT: MONTHLY PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY APRIL 2015 Public Works Street Maintenance March Aril Pot Hole Repairs 332 227 Graffiti Removal 141 41 Storm Drains Cleaned 17 17 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 79 55 -- -._..._...._._...--- Signs Installed 19 4 Sign Repairs 32 49 Sidewalk Repairs (Square Ft) 260 750 Curb & Gutter Repairs (Linear Ft) 0 30 Removed Illegal Signs 335 127 Area Sprayed With Herbicide (in acres) 16 5 Shopping Carts Pick -Ups 71 60 Trimmed Trees Various Locations 7 30 Drain Inspections 17 25 Removal of Road Hazards _ 30 2.5 Heatwurx Repair Units 0 2668 Vehicle Maintenance ___._..._ Vehicle Repairs 12 15 — ...... _... ._...... . Vehicle Service 7 5 Alignments 0 0 Tire Installation & Repairs 17 22 Small Equipment Repairs 8 6 Service Calls 9 10 Mufflers & Tailpipes 0 0 Body Shop Repairs 0 0 Trailers Repaired 12 9 Batteries & Jump Starts 7 6 Boat Repairs 0 10 Heavy Equipment Repairs 17 9 Vehicle Maintenance Program (Fleet 2000) 1 8 1 0 Weed Abatement Lots Cleared0 Cleaned0 0 — ---- — .....---._._...._ _..... City Lots Cleaned 6 12 Trees Trimmed 16 55 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 10 5 Replaced irrigation clocks 0 0 Shopping Carts Picked Up 15 6 Checked all Landscaped areas for Major Issues 0 1 Day Removed Illegal Signs 4 0_ ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC COUNTER Research Requests 7 -- 5 —_ _ _-___._.--_. _ Plan Checks 5 1 Final Maps 0 0 Grading 5 0 Street Improvement 2 0 Development Roview 6 4 Flood Plain Determination 0 2 Bond Release Requests 0 4 Oversize Transportation Permits 4 7 Encroachments Permit Applications 9 10 Encroachment Permit Traffic Issues 0 3 CIP UPDATE . .. ..... .... . . — ----- Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status Senior Center Sidewalk Senior 100% plans In progress ------ .... . Contractor submittals Improvements Center completed approved. Materials on Project No. 4424 order. Project in construction Start Date 4/21/15. McVicker bog Park McVicker 100% 100% completed Project completed Fence Improvements Park Complete Project is under close - Project No. Z40000 out phase Notice of Completion filed on 3/10/2015. Lakepoint Park Electrical Lakepoint 100% In progress West Coast lighting & Panel Park Complete Energy (Contractor) Project No.4414 submittals completed. New electrical panel & switch ordered. Expected by 5/14/2015. Partial construction began 4/2/2015 on cabinet No. I. Serenity Park- Skate Serenity Park 30% Scheduled for April In progress - received Zone completion 2015 RFP for design. Project Project No. 4419 in construction. Start date 4/13/2015. Facilities �_Master -—PI an— —Citywide-- .. . . .......... b - Project underway, afa Project No. Z30000 collection completed. Preparation of draft report under progress, I Anticipated completion by June/July 2015, Parks ities Master Citywide ... . .......... Anticipated completion Plan by July 2015, GI -ID is Project No. 4106 preparing final report for Parks Master Plan. In progress 58% complete. CIP UPDATE I-- ---------- Project Project Design --------- Construction ..... ....... Project Status Location City Master Drainage Citywide In progress Received draft of Plan Update proposed District Project No. 120 alignments; draft routed to local stakeholders. User Fee Study Citywide In progress Fee study underway by Project No. Z30002 Willcan Engineering. Cost allocation study completed. Anticipated completion March/April 2015. Gunners-on Street Gunnerson 95% design Staff to submit RFA Rehabilitation between completed package to Caltrans for Project No. 4350 Lakeshore construction by Drive and 7/1/2015, 100% Plan & SR-74 Received on 4/20/15. NEPA environmental doc submitted to Caltrans on 4/9/2015. RNV certification to Caltrans by 4/27/15. Collier Island Outlet Mall 80% Construction Developer Agreement Modification Phase I completed anticipated for approved. Plans are Project No. 4388 April/May 2015 being finalized by staff and Developer to bid the project, City Attorney to open escrow account. City-- M- & n--u- - um--en—t Signs — —Lake E —Is-i no, T e 1- -0-0 %-- In P ro-g res ss Project under Project No. 4396 design construction. Anticipated completed completion by June 23, 2015 CIP UPDATE _._ . .. ........... Project Project Design Construction Project Status Location Third Street Drainage - Lake Elsinore In progress Coordination with area Phase 1 development continues, Project No. 4296 work on preliminary design plan has begun, Traffic §ignal Installation Sage at -1-00% i rProject completed. Canyon Hills/Sage Road Canyon Hills Project No. 4368 Notice of Completion filed with City Council on 3/10/15. TM471-c-S-on-al —Installation -R,--iverside ___8_5_%__ __________ City Coordin a I ti - n . g with Grand Avenue at Drive (HWY County on development Riverside 74) @ Grand projects and obtaining Project No. 4392 Ave and signal plans from Riverside Dr. developer. (HWY 74) @ Lakeside H, S, Slurry Seal Project Various 100% 100% Project completed. Project No. Z10014 streets citywide Pavement Management Citywide In progress Project will out to bid by Program (Grind & 4/20/15. Overlay / R&R Phase 2) Project No. Z10008 Annual —Pavement citywide in progress Citywide sidewalk Management Plan - survey project kick-off Project No. Z10005 meeting conducted by Bucknam & Associates on March 17, 2015. Anticipated completion in June/July 2015. 34% of the field Survey is completed so far, CIP UPDATE . .. . ......... . Project Project Design Construction Project Status I-15/Railroad Canyon 1-15 @ In progress PA&ED in progress City Road Interchange Railroad Council Roundabout Improvements (PAED) Canyon Project progress update Project No. Z10016 Interchange conducted in March 2015. Anticipated PA&ED completion in December 2015. Railroad Canyon/1-15 1-15 @ 100% Plans approved by Finalize bidding Southbound Off Ramp Railroad CALTRANS. City documents and bid out Deceleration Lane Canyon proceeding with on 4/22/2015. Project No. 4432 Interchange construction bidding Main Street Interchange Being added to the Project No. Z10017 TUMF Network, being placed on the upcoming CIP to perform PSR, Needs to be improved by 2024. City to perform feasibility analysis of Main St. new interchange and Camino Del Norte COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Grant Yates, City Manager FROM: Johnathan O. Skinner, Community Services Director DATE: April 20, 2015 SUBJECT: Community Services Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Vicky Saavedra, Community Services Office Specialist, RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The following provides a summary of the Community Services Department's programs, activities and events for March 2015. VOLUNTEERS We are currently recruiting clerical volunteers for the following departments; Public Works, Engineering, City Clerk's Office, Human Resources and Community Services. The Community Services Department utilized a total of 15 volunteers for the Unity in the Community 5k Run, which will was held on Saturday, April 18, 2015. We are also recruiting 12 volunteers to help with the 2015 Pet Walk, which will be held on Saturday, May 9, 2015. The current total of volunteer applications submitted this year is 20, which include 4 adults and 16 youths. COMMUNITY CENTER The Community Center launched REC1, a new reservation and registration software program that will replace ActiveNet, the software that our department was utilizing. REC1 is a user-friendly and affordable software that will improve our customer service and community presence. Many residents have taken advantage of the new program and completed the activity registrations and facility reservations on the website. We plan to expand this program at multiple locations and for many different community events. Studio 395 hosted their monthly "Live Art & Music' event on Saturday, March 21. They enjoyed live music by local bands and vendor's that sold arts and crafts by local artist. SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER Free income tax preparation and filling services continued this month and will continue through mid-April for all seniors. Walk-in service was available on Wednesdays and Fridays from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Ron Toth, from Rancho Physical Therapy conducted an excellent new hands-on workshop on Fall Prevention. He led the group in exercises to strengthen the legs and assist with balance and discussed simple fall prevention measures that they can take to lessen the risk of falling. The seniors had their annual St, Patrick's Day luncheon on Tuesday, March 17 with a full crowd of 57 participants. The Lake Elsinore Genealogy Society met with the seniors to provide informative and educational information regarding searching for your family roots. The Department of Public Health conducted an Asthma & COPD workshop on how to develop an action plan to manage their conditions. On Wednesday, March 25, the C.A. R.E. program held their annual Fraud Awareness workshop. They welcome special guest speaker, Deputy District Attorney Frank Donzanti to speak on Elder Abuse, Scams, Annuities and Insurance Fraud. Other monthly services included; bread distribution, notary services, and Successful Aging and Peace of Mind workshops. SPECIAL EVENTS The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation held a "Walk for the Cure" event, which was held on Saturday, March 7. The event had 1,500 participants that came together at the Diamond Stadium to support their family and friends who have Type 1 Diabetes. Lucas Oil Regional Off -Road Truck Races held their first of three regional races at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park on March 7 and 8. This event brought in 5,000 people in attendance over the weekend, On March 20 and 21, Lucas Oil National Off -Road Truck Races held their first of three national races at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park. These races brought over 20,000 people in attendance. On March 28 and 29, the National Water Ski Racing Association returned to Lake Elsinore after a 3 year hiatus. This event featured high speed marathon races around the lake. Participants were able to set up and launch from La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. Spectators were able to see first-hand how these participants prepared for this high speed race. Rosetta Canyon HOA held their annual Egg Hunt at Rosetta Canyon Park on Saturday, March 29. They had many fun activities such as crafts, face painting and a magician for the community to enjoy. This event was open to the public and brought close to 500 people in attendance. The City of Lake Elsinore welcomed an Amphibious Bridge Exercise Project that was held on March 23 through the 27, 2015. The United States Marine Corp. performed the installation of a temporary bridge project that spanned over a small gap on the east side of the channel as well as the width of the channel on Lake Elsinore. Over 90 Marines stationed their equipment (totaling over 30 heavy duty trucks) to supply portable bridge equipment, amphibious boats to maneuver floating bridge components and large trucks that transported personnel and equipment to the site. City officials and the general public were invited to walk over both bridges during media day. As quickly as they created the bridge, the Marines had the bridge deconstructed by the next day and were on the road one day early. The City appreciates USMC for selecting Lake Elsinore for this exercise and look forward to future opportunities to assist in training our troops. SKATE PARK The total attendance at the McVicker Skate Park for the month of March was 640. We had 6 skate park rentals and 41 new waivers forms filled out. Skate 156 Scooter 326 BMX 158 ) . dma / . \ y \ own d t . .. . \ \ \ ? \ ca In COD ��© Q .\ � \ \* mud \� \ \ \ \ - o ` 2 \ / co j !0 !% { > \ a , z E \ - y - — { _ f t — _co© \M\ � \ §: � ^� \ � , \ {\/=- zz {: %: % \\ §\ 29 /t/ 5 \ ƒ } 2 O Q re a` l o• `lM12.R a'L Afl9 nj Sv#4yg� 11�Y '3.JA IN ; :t •i v � • tib • �: Na <N' ei' 4V? e • � F k�N Nz N iN' :Yy • xl lei by� \V'F �rC • ?^ s IN e. �' N5 N � • S � s to toe O Q re a` V V) 4J m 41 C (U 10 10 C H V C L Q� W c 0 m o N a L y .y V Q N O a 0 N C U/ E m 0 o CLv '% o v � W Im V1 + O C C 0 o yy N u V u a v v Y U N 9 F- ct 7 R C LL r 0 0 ^ n � m q V_ d = > E o E a o u U O CL c 0 m o N a L y .y V Q N O a 0 N 0 F- N p O) N �- � CJ o � Ln O o � N � O Q p O ° 7 m 2 a O m ui m � m o m m N O m m - Y cdP L v N � Q N m 4 � � Y Q L o o c O a � � = V m m = ¢ W W V Q) N UI IL l n H m 41 4j c N N o S a E m O o th LU° c N to i p 01 'o a Y LL' u LO L T v G c 0 O LL LL Q a s a c v G LL in Y � O N LL J N a 9 F C � Q C •V � i7 � � � _ O U D o OW r4 f" Q mea c o a O V .O U N o J N 17 op M i N m N N Q � v 0 � 70 N O O ro a� Y Jct iiL (o F - 9 S T L c� G m Ln U y D O m m ~ m 'C � O � i 3 N a U O N O O ~ U > .O � N � C N 'C � � U N — ` p w c� 0 m u Q) pl N � K H lt. E to 4n -I ~Z u%C j � W Y N N Q � v 0 � 70 N O O ro a� Y Jct iiL (o F - 9 S a N d) CYC (0 a a v �� N M M O N N U �. i� ro J W w N U. J u ^C W E L m a v 7 O W a ,y s. O 7 m O N N E E a 0 N N C Cv L C N O UJ L_ U. T O 3 C 3 w o .O iJ V to C t ? a m O C O � > ci � u C > E O G O U CL m O N N E E a 0 N ~ g / ) 0 ƒ 0 0 3 . _\ \ ƒ \ } } . \ e § /{ y . \ { &/` / - : _ ! 15 , E>\ / P,) m - \ m _ . o !s ) cm: c:= + : / § = me o K, 2 / \ �: N « a »4 % ef0 k G 0 \f $ §{ $ , ) 2 } e & / : ~ ` 2)\ « \\ \ < IN ) /ED 7 \ 00 ` Ln E + © - _}:\ ` / 2 7 \ § \ ) \\ 9 \ J LL \ ;LL _ }\\kjƒ\ \\\ m v W 0 N is H � r LU � LU 2 k U. f j W Y W 0 N ... i N tt �. y c) 1 J 0 N N m t0 d fil V N ip O 'i N M N a J f 1 T x f �f �.�. �� �. �,. _.... .. �. .�_ ._f _.... i N tt �. y c) 1 J 0 N N m t0 d fil V N ip O 'i N M N a J W M LL J u C E L CL d IL C 0 v a� L N N u m J iJ C V V c N u i, cn L w W C O u N H V <D O c r.. a w N L_ T C D 19 7 N O a) O N C C U1 E i C O O a •� v v a W Im V1 c r•' _O 7 O X C v m s 0 v i �% N H > C W s O C ro � O C ro � > E O E d O U ` O d v C O u N H V <D O c r.. a w N L_ T C D 19 7 N O a) O N r M M N N H It1 c^ H C z Ln V c N ) 4- N L _ C O ) c m `o _ N N I N G � O i O` O U p 1 A N ¢ i ffl n cc N Cn .a m C p j S � m = Z M O) O a L m C N U 0 c S w 0 ? O w N Ti lL a C S ¢ C a U ii m E O Q a a N LL: y J q U o N C N W m N N o A LU L N W r � O n @ F^ 1 N CL c o n W J N ri � O W o n m N r K LL ~ LL M r NL{ Z O W Y rl r � � r O N Orr r M cam- LO LO O c U O O N N N O U u ~ U L N T „d a y C C M M M O O 0 N w �a d w m a E c o 0 0 o U c O w N Q O O 0 N c N ° U U K } (� N r K LL ~ LL M r NL{ Z O W Y rl N N m N d a r, v r� �n b N C') M U N N U d 7 N m J 0 O y N E `o N s cD N N m N 2 i-� c d E i c O r a U. T G � C O 3 v- v v u m s S U N H i `y c > N c LL t 0 c O T im � u > E o V E CL o u O CL 0 O y N E `o N s cD N N m N 2 ai -� , 1""11+� W C O O N V 7, m F N � C V _ uU N O O U M N N O U) Q U. 9 b d ..C�+ V uN..�Oa.Krnf- C O O N V 7, c O V _ uU ui V U) UI m b O O � r n C o r m C 0 I S N N co C w 'L O m S ou 41 a w tL T L Q V) C � u u U C d M Q N CL u O d N LL T Q Q C O OL C) U d o Q Q N y N 5- C a F N m O � 41 K m ih NM O N m O in 0 LL 0 H) m O F F— (1 N v � u a 2 o r T � w a rn N T T T T <Y O 1E ,L^ 0 V T tp T LU T N_W LL o LL LL Uw �- p ��-r�'vCOc -� rT cn> O W Y CO O N (7 " W 4 City of Lake Elsinore Li--IKE r-1-S1110Jk -'�--'� 0hlet A', ,�,Yl uJ1nF Regular Agenda Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCY MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCY MEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - None PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Cultural Center The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 Successor Agency Regular Agenda April 28, 2015 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and tum it into the Clerk. The Chair or Clerk will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless an Agency Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 14-542 Warrant List Dated April 16 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated April 16, 2015. Attachments: SA RDA Staff Reporl 4_288=15 SA RDA Warrant_ summary 04II3 15, SA RDA Warrant List 04 16 15 2) ID# 14-543 Successor Agency Investment Report for March 2015 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015. Attachments: SA RDA Investment Staff Report 2015-03 p_df SA RDA Investment Report 2013-03.pdf PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Successor Agency will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 4/23/2015 City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 lake-elsinore.org Text File File Number: ID# 14-542 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: Successor Agency File Type: Report Agenda Number: 1) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 412312015 LA E L SINOIkf 1)RI AM REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE AGENCY CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: GRANT YATES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED APRIL 16, 2015 Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated April 16, 2015. Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued by the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore since the prior Warrant List. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II Reviewed By: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 4-16-15 AIP.M L I(, 2015 W A;R,RAN F SIJMI M \RY SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF `]Fll-IIE ,R',EIDE'V1EII,O!1'1VIEN"1F AG, NC'Y OF "11,131E CITY OF LAK1E :EILSAINORIF FUND# FUND D SCR:IP'l':IOSN 101 AL 510 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 1 $ 7,548.78 520 SUCCESSOR TO RDA_AREA 2 2,993.54 530 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 3 3,656.52 540 SUCCESSOR STADIUM CAPITAL 29,593.66 GRAND TOTAL $ 43,792.50 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 SA RDA 1 of 1 APRIL 16, 2015 WARRAINI LIST' SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF -,[']HE ;R,EIDE'VIEIL.OFMl-,M: AGENCY 011 'FI IIE CITY OF LAKE ELSINOR'E C] ECK# VLN DOR N'AML', AMOUNT' 7265 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON MANN -_ 7266 UNION BANKOF CALIFORNIA 7267 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER WARRANT TOTAL- 29,593.66 OTAL 29,593.66 1 Q 425.74 1,038.01 2,735.09 792.50 GRAND TOTAL $ 43,792.50 4/20/2015 Warrant 04 16 15 SA RDA 1 of 1 Agenda Date: 4/28/2015 In Control: Successor Agency Agenda Number: 2) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 14-543 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 4/23/2015 CITY OF LADE Cog,LSINOR E DREAM EXTREME,. REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE AGENCY CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: GRANT M. YATES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SUCCESSOR INVESTMENT REPORT —MARCH 2015 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for March 2015. Discussion The Investment Report is a listing of all funds invested for the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore as of the date shown on the report. Prepared By: Nancy L. Lassey Finance Administrator Approved By: Jason P. Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates Executive Director Attachments: Investment Report for March 2015 Cvl-Y OF LADE LSI1`lORE DREAM EXTREME. SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INVESTMENT REPORT MARCH 2015 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 ACTIVE ACCOUNTS Bank of America - Successor Agency General Total Active Accounts INVESTMENTS Successor: Successor Local Agency Investment Fund Successor CAMP Pool Account Successor U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Successor Municipal Bond / Notes Successor Federal Agency Bond / Notes Successor Corporate Notes Successor Certificate of Deposit Sub -total Investments Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (LAIF SUC) Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 (CAMP SUC) Total Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-14 per GASB 31 Total Investments Cashier Drawers #1 & #2 City of Lake Elsinore Petty Cash Fund TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANG. BOOK BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE $ 122,139 $ - $ (51,711) $ 70,428 122,139 - (51,711) 70,428 1,888,377 - - 1,888,377 16,969 - - 16,969 2,250,065 - - 2,250,065 30,084 - - 30,084 1,353,594 - - 1,353,594 1,418,196 - - 1,418,196 100,000 - - 100,000 7,057,285 - - 7,057,285 3,236 - - 3,236 3,783 - - 3,783 7,018 7,018 7,064,304 - - 7,064,304 $ 7,186443 $ $(51,711) $ 7,134,732 0.00 n nn $ 7,134,732 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the Members of Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency on November 12, 2013. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk, The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Jason P. Simpson April 15, 2015 Director of Administrative Services Date SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND TRANSACTION SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH ENDING MARCH 31, 2015 Interest Rate Purchase Date Maturity Rate 0.278% Daily 24 -Hour Beginning Balance Net Increase/Decrease Endinq Balance $ 1,888,377 $ $ 1,888,377 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 FUND NAME Area I Area 11 Area III Stadium Trust Fund Total Pooled Cash & Investments AMOUNT 1,441,974 3,898,076 1,002,276 792,406 $ 7,134,732 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS FOR THE MONTH ENDING MARCH 31, 2015 DIVERSIFICATION MAXIMUM TYPES OF SECURITIES PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE U.S. Treasury Bills 0.00% UNLIMITED U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Current Balance Federal Agency Bond / Notes Current Balance Municipal Bond / Notes Current Balance Banker's Acceptances Certificates of Deposit Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Commercial Paper Medium Term Corporate Notes Current Balance Repurchase Agreements Reverse Repurchase Agreements LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) Current Balance CAMP -Pooled Sweep Account Current Balance TOTAL 31.88% 19.18% 0.43% 0.00% 1.42% 0.00% 0.00% 20.10% 0.00% 0.00% UNLIMITED $ 2,250,065 UNLIMITED $ 1,353,594 UNLIMITED $ 30,084 40.00% 25.00% $ 100,000.00 30.00% 15.00% 30.00% $ 1,418,196 UNLIMITED 20.00% 26.76% UNLIMITED $ 1,888,377 0.24% UNLIMITED $ 16,969 7,057,285 100.00% $ Note: Local agencies are only eligible to purchase medium term corporate notes that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation (S & P). If a security falls below "A" by both rating agencies, then PFM Asset Management LLC will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. The CAMP Portfolio Summary and Statistics shows the credit quality held by the City's investments. *No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies. � w ^% W O �` w � r~^� v J w � � its, w U I E y o o c >o C d � Y � � C �o N L O V V E N � O S C d � � C �o N C O a _ v m s o m a° f m U U 10- O Ol W pJ O O (h N M In M O Ol yl I(l n O N N In Ol M T lO In Ill � M OI M N l0 i0 N N N ti N N I� W vi N N dF E y o o c >o C d � Y � � C �o N L O V V E N � O S C d � � C �o N �7 n M N M Y O O C ip n o M rn � o Y V ip n rn N .-1 U4 th v U � v C O V V V N Y d A � f o v � C •6 = N O O �U n o o o o m M o MLr� o rn N Y O O C ip n o M rn � o Y in N n m v v rn W W d Y > G C > > Y O O C m vo o m ro n Q o Y D G c E m v v rn O a a D V U d Y p O M M O O M O f3i OJ V C O V V V N o vi of o ✓� o v � N N m a N E 0 a V v c O c O m T i p~ U v c a U V ^ v 7 C V U o V r� N rn io 7 o'4 .y iO V1 O W d- ip M O n N R Lr n C � W O a c v r CJ � V O > O v v VI V u7 N V w > O G Q O O N 7 N a z V p UOi m m a a` Q v j- ap m h O v � � Z V1 iy M U a � � o � m G � E - m 0 O N } 0 0 D o c 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 o c w o n c N M M V < ry ti fi A O f O A E E 7 L 3 H M C O u u Q M cu Im A c m �7 v A v Y A -] n n i0 Vl M i0 W Q O l0 M M W �O OJ Vl tp M W V Ol O V M Ill 6 O OJ Ol N M O Ilt t: O V1 W O coJ N V .� .-I M6 O V M O OJ O Vl N O M O O O O M O O In IO M O CO N O Il] N Ol , OJ Ol DJ M Mm OJ L!1 R Ol N Vl pJ pJ .-I O rn cl c o N Ill O O I\ If1 N V N n M M N n o o o m o m v M v rn o m o v Il1 V Il) iD m Ill N O O In Oi O I(1 N M N O Vl N .i W In 1� M Ill O O n V m M t!1 t0 Vl N N N N N N z O�r M F Y ¢ O m O a �o LL Y U ¢ u C6VV" O ¢ u U O D O OJ M w w V 'o E � V z U u Z 40W w ¢ zQ V z OLLoV~z< V¢ w ~p FIn O 0 O ¢ VpaO w¢ O O O 4 w w Duz mQ Q ¢ mVVU m U~1 1 O O D O O O O O N 00 M H N v m m a Ln V1 P OJ M O N in OJ � 0 p n m m n r ro .-i M v CO voi m N Y� vi n ry o ry v vi � ai r � m P N IO OJ O P O M N V Vl Cr M L L> U y 10 m N C � W Y � N M N M W d yJ� I(PI W W W O, In P W C W t0 If) M O O V W � a v L O LL ti N� N 1(1 O m W W H Q M ti Y O IO o m P o, r� N m OJ .+ N m in O O� O N Y N m ti m 0 v ll� IR Iq L9 ll� 1P r� ll� T C N v) N .y W ,D h P V O1 O M r0 rp T ip N h In N N OI r f� P OJ N O OJ O O 16 o Illi .i o� v v oa o 6 Q = M N N N W_ Y 'L W N N v ti ti ter .Pr Q P P-i Pi L-13 1P ti �1U, W Q N N P In P Vi � Vi V In N N M • � h � m 1� O, IO N\-� N N N o O � W ti O O O O O O O O O O C a U F o: (W_7 a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ •a oCM V1 v .. (n; o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �. y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C �( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO U: vi O m W o O Iri N o Vl N o O o N h vi 1� vi N o0 o O vi N w ; \✓ " O X X o F < O n m u u O K H in y.I V)m O K U) Ul > > Q 6 ttl V V u' „W Y; LLJ J W o a o o o o i O w N VI VI 1� V1 w O W w O W V1 N W N M W VI V1 W N V1 W N V1 W V1 VI N W VI N W Ip w N W w W O 0 OJ O O 1p 1p g ,m o o� o0 0 0 00 0 o a o 0 0 oM o a Q Z ti Z N Z ti Z ZNy Z N ZMy Z N ZMy Z N Z ti Z P Z 4• Z ti �r W 6 Q Q Q t�,- d U f- O F D 1' N D f-' D F❑ I- O � O � O � O � O �- D F❑ F- D N U1 I- V1 F- VI I- VI F VI � VI 1- V1 - VI I- VI 1- V1 I- V1 h' vl - V1 f- ✓I F t7 ui m b N M N N b 1� O h W P O [F O N W Q N N W L m q ip N m m rn n io y � O C6 O rn N O h V M 1� OJ O N V OJ N V v� i0 Q N M Y D �% M ti � O1 h N CO U In N ypj O W O O m p O 14 ti O M O O O N Vt Vt O O Vl 10 � N M ry� V o o h n 11 V1 n C NO OJ Ld V a N N n O N N Vl V M N M .Mi ti 'Ti d .Mi r �i .tea .Ni M -i ti ti ti .moi ly IQ ry lO Vti' �O ti 1p h V N N �p O O O N N N w � T C m m m m m m m a + + at Q+ ¢+ ¢+ ¢+ ¢+ ¢+ G+ 4+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 o D o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D O p o O o 0 o O o 0 0 N 0 0 0 N % M M O M T M O O N N h IYI N N N L m y 6 q IN/1 N O W OJ V V Ny � n OM M M M N ti ti rl M V�^ fy✓/ YJ L r^ N N N N r r r r r r r v> u'o o o o� o o� o� 00 0� o o� Wu o z �o o Pn z i°n z^ z ,n z �'n z z ,a.. ... W F Lq m m O ro G 4 w< m Q .o ¢ io tti, O .. m m o 4 0 O ti OM.+ Q o o OJ Ny OJ .fir N Q ry r� H M M In m O O OJ N O w kp M o P P O r v M W O vi ti I M ti m n ti � n N Cn rn m o n r m m m o P m e O 1� V1 O O O O N P VI m In O M 1� vt N N N O P VPi m � M o w \ \ P \ Vl � ✓1 P z o O 1� T V m m r�'i ro o °� rMi ."-i rvNi vPi o n � N m O W M 00 M OJ m M vi P M o P P O r v M ti O vi ti I M m m n o v n N Cn rn m o n r m m m o P m � O 1� V1 O O O O N P VI m In O N N w o w \ \ P \ Vl � ✓1 P z o O 1� T V m m r�'i ro o °� rMi ."-i rvNi vPi o n � N i A O M O r T N N O ti ti ti ti wl ti P P N O N lD 1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O m H w o w \ \ P \ Vl � ✓1 P z o O 1� T V yMj M N N .v O� N P m Vl O� M OO N N O O O O O O O O O O O O i A \ ip N P wl T P P t� O N lD 1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O m H w o w \ \ P \ Vl � ✓1 P z o O 1� T V 0 o VI o 0 o F o o OO N O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 M Q N ¢ Q Q Q Q 6 Q 6 Q ¢ O K O O O pO O O O O O O O O O O O ¢ e � N O o O H � -J W .r lJ O ^ O O •'� a 'I IJJ Z N Q N 6 i A ip N P wl T P P t� O N lD m H w o w m z o 0 0 0 0 0 o VI o 0 o F o o OO N Oj N O O N OJ ` Z Vl V�1 O i0 Q M U _p O K O O O o m\ H\ ¢\ ¢ e � N O o O -J W .r lJ O ^ O O •'� a Q IJJ Z N Q N 6 O W N N N N $ U ZO ZO N N O U O a 2 0 u i A Ln N N W o a b b T of b �6 N .-i W m M2 I lO 16 N W u V � ti Y1 YI YI tlY V' al � C 0o m •L L O '� o O Ifl m 0 rn N a a v ti vi vi L vt 0 LL � 9 N n W O H d Q C O N N N C N H N N Y! E o 0 I- U M ro m T Ya ti m p` _ a ti V) N O W � y � N f 0 u Q' c Q a ' + E ..0 . oC < o M < 0 m 01 V) 0 o a m m o 0 0 006 Cd C U: n po a a f0 U ".. w Ln W' ti vi r i O Z � V) Lu j V LU u c Y J bf; ui Y A Wn c 0 `u a W' F !' W �� e� �\ LL:: f 9 T N T V Y d N H Q¢ W U O O] P N N VI P P Ln N % m ti M p Yn 3 N M O (Y] W P M 'D VI N iD V1 �D V1 n n OJ 1� V1 W OJ OJ M N M M W N O � fi ri ^i fi .� N m m m ri (ri m m d v N m M � G � � � m M n O P OJ P (V P ♦D r/ N VI VI •-� n n DJ n VI OJ OJ O M N v s � � C � J Y M O n C P �q � N n O M n n n M VI W V M OR p1 �f y :. Ur O U O M �/l n N n OJ Of V n o O m n C � Q T M W vl T vl W O to N N C N Y (D N P ti N M m V fl M V 'i N P � `D F V W C c O M ti 7 th U Y Yw V1 n V' m ro W n n O rri �/) v W Ln W m O O in O m ✓� m M M a.J _ N ^ N OW P N I R VI n U 'a n OJ OJ W �y IQ M O O n d' P O Vl M �D N N R N n N Vl In P OJ M Q N N ^, P ID �O m CJ V1 T V MID O N V1 ll� fi T W Y U •� o o m .i o .y .i .. n m a+ _ Y U v L Y N z L }} LLL U dJ Z w w C UJ C7 5 Q 5 g 4' s u M s s u u p ° w w w o m w u' m u w w m � u m u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p uj W m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CR 0 o O o 0 c O1 (� : y vi O OJ O vi N o Ny 00 o N vi n vi n vi N o0 0o vi N v. N W m U M N N N N M G :.� p y x Ul VI VI D O Q Q m u u Yv F LL u �'•� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ro N ro N ro N W N OJ N m N ro N N m N N m N W ro N N W N ro N (^ w< I.i4.I::. U u P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P H LU M i ^� LLO' y �p �p .nr n .nr .ny OJ W OJ P T P P P P �!}}•1 W w, W Vl W W W W O W O VI N W �D V1 W M VI Vl W N V1 VI W N Vl O W Vl N W �p Vl N Vl N W �p W VI O W O Vl In W 1� y o'"oNoNo�ooNo'"o'"oo po� oN off. ,i, v a z•;z z z zNz ztiz �z ti .oQo z z z zo z z r_ 3 LL o ,... I I' � E � m � o � � W o � o tt o � •� � o � .N. � � � o � o � o � o � w P i • CJ VI � O � O � � � O � � � � � O � � � O � O � O � � J O � � � � UI L Y O f m a rr•Ln M m m •.• •. ro m in N w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-+ .+ .� p o 0 A C M O H 1- u Y O m 3 m n m h O O m V N O1 o W N N V1 M V1 O In O[ I(1 Li O N m ti 4l Pn M O N O C G) C 1_ O V 1/Nl VI O M lN/t Obi U1 c1 O c0 W O W J \ N � M b M m in V m vl m 1p �Y � in u1 0 LL U 1p .n-� O M M L LO O C � Q G U Vl N O O O[ [O Q• VI O [D N 10 C .b.. y N N V_ Y W W O l0 b V O OM m lWrl m 100 Vl N [O � [O N T O M O H P N b ti ; O O O V16 N m 10 10 p0 O V1 V 10 16 N C M ti N 1p a M 1y CD Y o o N v1Oi ,N. 10 o m rn O Vl 1 "� N n V v rNi N I u o o O o o m m N L Z L } U. U' m z O im u LL z J m u m Ou 2 rr u U O > u 2:z T .LL-, Q o 0 0 0 00 0o O o 0 0 o O U)- o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 01 W �p O. o o c o o 0 il; O o O o 0 0 0 0 o o v; u; o 0 0 0 iQ U M 01 .M-i OH OH N ^Ni .N-i .Mi uoi vim, M a U) z m n ll) O m W y F F V M I.y LLW VI W '. -,• U O N ti M ti M .M-1 .M-[ .M-i ti .Mv M-I ti M M M M M M M M t0 N V W lv H g vr, LU m01 10 1D 10 n m m m m O[ Q OmO N O O N O O O O O O O 10 10 Z O O M N N N N N \ N N N N N N ~ C0 \^ Oa OF NV1 O fa h FZ OO OoO f°[� ' 4-.., W •• 00 Oo000\O o o a�% y 0 F Z O O V1 Z V1 Z Vl Z VI Z ^V1 V.-1i J n J N N N VI Ln V ' [ Y d ¢ yl L'iO J J J Q m 44yyww g'. y - N Y .. O Vl o O M 0 d' o m o o m M Oj N N M O .j G ti U' J ti M M M M N .r ON Q M tt M ON ON Y V1 T W N Q In Vl N W W W W W O W¢ 10 Q ¢ Q ¢ {0 Q Q T f V O Z va'. O �` N Y W � � •-� o O� O .-� .y 10 Z�� N� N f N 1p N y M - ti a Z O V O W O •W p[ W y z z z a� o Ln y O 0 F� n o o+ N m o .m-i 1� m m O N N Ooi O N � M y a Ln ti M L � �. m N ^ m O O ., ^ M M V1 O •-� f'. N N N M M M M V' N •� ei N O o m � r c � � N H o o m iz o m ry rn m m N o lii .a.I N ✓ l7 O U rn o o m M ro V' ti m m N O` Oi 'S o �p o0 ^ P a N L N M N E M o`c a J O m O Vl O i:z N O O N O O III O N ^ N O 1/Pi O Vl fl N W U1 ^ O1 n O A U `^N_ ^ m m ro o m Io P a n c O ^+ r � m m 6 li N /. IU M O O O O N C N b P M N O P IPII W Vl O N a O O 01 m C N •-� •-� ti � N O N "- Y U O O N O � O O O O O Ol Ol O O O O L LL U Z F 3 a o a o m u z m m m S° m m m a'o; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o y '. S o 0 o S O o o O o 0 0 o a m �W♦ a O N IN/1 W 1011 O O :'.U:.' N N .N- ei O M Lo � 1 O, m m o M P p m x P J W; VI J' ti m ry o m ro r P V1 O1 P P h 1D N )p m aY C.i 1-a W V1 O1 lO n O O H 41i T W m M po 0 0 0 o vl 0 0 0 0 o m o o NO N U N W N N N O` O N N ~ m N O U• y Cj UI: Q C o 6 N t?i\ W �p NO Q r•l Z O )O Q M W F N\ 0 O r' —� O K O O O O O U1 O Z O ll1 O U o a O O H v; W :. a ,_ o w W o o z z �v�i 19 3 r!' tt m o 1°- p 12 Y m YM-� d ✓t � N-� N N p (�. G N O .Nr �, O' .N-� .Mi O .M-, O .M- .M- ti O K f .P-1 NVli V W: Z O Y W \ O W b 0 O O U p Vel �D M m V in O Ip Z O 1-0 o 0 Q O Z E Y o O m m O C N � o m � O N O i O O N N C b N v � W O J ++ O N N t+ N O O � C � -J a M iR J u O V � O O N m U n W C c O ri N O � Y 7 lf1 M W M H Vaf i O� t0 N 00 N b N 4p N ilF N Vf +Pr yj ap Y U m a` f V W p Z v 0 m` m m ro ro L a m m � v a a V <J O ti m t': G � "J iJ O wO H O O49H kyt a a m T Q Y N V Y n VI i vi 6 F C J O 1 l7 S W O N U C M 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o ti � O O 1n N n N 1(1 10 O o o n M ti N 0 m ni n vi o vi vi ro N o O C0 N o O 0 O 0 Ul � M ti ti ti Vl N O O O� Vl N N N N N N O N ti ei b v n O 0 o 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 o M w y. O O rn N O 10 O o o n M ti N 0 - v`ni m m rMi v o ry ry m o O C0 N o O 0 O 0 Ul � M ti ti ti Vl N O M O� Vl N N N N N N O N ti ei O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O 0 00 0 M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O In O C0 N o O 0 O 0 Ul � M 0 0 H Vl N O M O� Vl N N N N N N O N ti ei n O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O o0 00 0D 0 o O 0 0 o o O In O C0 N o O 0 O 0 Ul � M 0 0 N Vl N O M O� Vl N N N N N N O N ti NN m 0 o v o N m u H � � M L � Y 0 G J 0 o i V V N N d N � = O 0 N U t L G J 0 o � N N d N L O N V 0 N U 'j w a rn L m O 0 N N rn N N0 0 u U 'j w a w a o � m N M M O U Q C � C4 O � �O � O N , 0 0 C r M rri � N � o 0 U m v o fE a w o V1 � 'u d O u o r M M � O O L .. ei C � r O O �L o N o � LU LLI a C � 3 .: O C' 4 UO` U a Lo W' dU. u m U' C m SLU'-.. rn L m O 0 N N rn N � ry 0 u U 'j w a w a o � m o M , O P � O O � �O � O m v rn L m O m N N rn N � ry 0 N O 'j vi m o N � M O O P � rn O � �O � O w Z d Z 0 0 0 r M rri JOE, M 0 C P o � � 0 m N N o N � � N O o vi m o N e 0 N N 0 0 0 � w Z d Z 0 0 0 M rri O N � rn rn M rn w a m N N � N m m P � O C N e o c N N w w � vi � w Z d Z rn } O } C e M rri 0 a d O � N r M M � O O O ei C � r O O rn rn a. m rn w v m m ro e M N N w vi vi � w w rn b e M rri 0 0 ei r m 9 O bi v O M C N N to � N , V Ill I V W W rl d Ol l0 � Ol M {O N N .N i Ol V O M M lD l0 , N N M W O C OJ Ill M �O M O 1p .-I i0 W O O L6 l6 O CO M l6 O6 N Q •'I R W N ID �O Ol !� Ol N O N W Ifl It) M M r O OJ OJ Ol rel y yl O ll7 N Ol N V M N C aY V V Ol lC Ol Vl Ol N Ol N Ol O O M O Oq M Ol V Vl Vi R M IO Ol Ci O O O T V S E m c c W O N y C C Ill O O If) M Ill [Y O O l0 O lD M O V O l0 O O M O L � O N In Ilt h O" M Ill . OJ Ill lIl M O f� O N L!1 O Vl O O y .-I h h M lO I� vl V vl nNi W Ol LL U M M M C- Ol N CO pj ip Ill n Ol .�-i pOi 1p M 1� O 'i c IA V V OJ O O V W M V O cj O h M R N CO " a C Ill O M O .I M � � u O O Z, L y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � L -I N H 'i •-1 H .-1 H fi H H H H 'i 'i 'i 'i 'i 'i 'i H a `m +1 0 0 u u U c c 0 0 Yn In L'i in �n co v v v v v J f 0 N c v N O O O .C. .C- .G -i .0 O O O O O O O N O O O O ri y0., O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 'C 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — — — 0 0 0 0 .a a o. a a a a a - Z' m m lL a > > > m a a m 10 !a N i0 T_ (0 !0 p !o m io io .D :O :O N_ i0 N_ m NJ J J > N C J J J J > > > J O L 9 ^ a a a a a a a > > > _ > > > N > > > > i -Cr rCi �-Cr > > > > C rCr i -Cr i -Cr �-Cr rCn �-Cn i -Ci v rCi rCi rCr rvCr i -Ci �-Ci rY rCr O O O v v G L L L N 2 U V V V ` C H - �-I - In L!1 Ill Ifl L!1 f� r n n n n n O O\\a y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U C v y 67 .Mi ti H O Y 01 N N N �D Vl 111 Vl Vl Ill Ll) I� r r n n n t\ O O ti .i C OO O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M h� C M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 I O F tlo OJ M M M 111 W l0 ID l0 W N Ol ip ip M Ltl n D\ N O Ifl O O N lfl N Ill O N tp N V1 T N ti ti y O o O O O O u o 0 0 0 0 N Y S � t Ol Ol M C M O O O C l0 G C 00 V O 0 O N �Mi O Ol Ol C N N N N W C C C C C N 0 0 0 o E o > d 0 a 6 2 d v `u 0 o N > 10 > N > > c a a a a E � yO lJ N N W N rC+ Ip yI In m �n m �n m io m C V U V V � U Y d � N A M M M M O y O O O O O O � t Ol Ol M C M O O O C l0 O O (y C C 00 V O 0 O N �Mi Ol Ol C N p L O p C M O O O C C C 00 V O 0 O N �D tip N v ma 00 O � M N HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL EVALUATION OF THE DELANEY RANCH HOUSE COMPLEX LOCATED AT 523 WEST MINTHORN STREET, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Laura S. White, M.A. Robert S. White David M. Van Horn, Ph.D. John Minch and Associates, Inc. 26623 Sierra Vista Mission Viejo, CA 92692 Tel: (949) 367-1000 Fax: (949) 367-0117 Prepared for: zspyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, LLLP 923 North Pennsylvania Avenue Winter Park, FL 32789 Contact: Erik Lunde, Project Manager Submitted to: City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Planning Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 June, 2014 North view of Delaney Ranch Clouse as viewed from bottom of hill (circa 1970). (Photo courtesy of the Reed Webb family). TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary 1. INTRODUCTION II. STUDY AREA LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENT. III. A BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF LAKE ELSINORE.. IV. HISTORIC RESOURCE LISTINGS V. HISTORICAL SOCIETY CORRESPONDENCE. Vl. LAND PATENTS. VII. HISTORIC MAP RESEARCH . VIII. PROPERTY HISTORY. IX. THE DELANEY RANCH COMPLEX X. FIELD SURVEY XI. BUILDING RECORDS FOR THE STUDY AREA XII. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF 523 W. MINTORN STREET COMPLEX XIII. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY XIV. DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY XV. RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES CITED. APPENDIX A: Personnel Qualifications APPENDIX B: Original Historic Property Inventory Form APPENDIX C: Lake Elsinore Historical Society Correspondence PAGE LTA 3 3 12 14 15 15 17 26 26 27 27 30 32 33 35 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1. Regional location of project area as indicated 2 on a portion of the USGS Santa Ana 1:100,000 topographic map sheet (1983). Figure 2. Study area plotted on a portion of the USGS Lake Elsinore 7.5' lbpographic Quadrangle. (1997). 4 Figure 3. Study area as shown on aerial photograph. 5 Figure 4. 1972 Riverside County Flood Control 18 and Water Conservation Map of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West showing locations of various buildings and structures located within the Delaney Ranch complex. Figure 5. Recent aerial showing former locations of 19 ranch building and structures. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Property ownership records from 1923-1929. 21 Table 2. Property ownership records from 1930-1946. 22 ffl LIST OF PLATES PAGE Plate I. Top: Northwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House. 37 from access road to the east. Bottom: Southeasterly view of Delaney Ranch I -louse from hilltop to the northwest. Plate IL Top: Southwesterly view of Delaney Ranch 38 from Pool House above. Bottom: West facing view into courtyard showing damage. Plate III. Top: 1981 photograph of courtyard looking 39 southwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Southwesterly view into courtyard as it appears today. Plate IV. Top: 1981 photograph of milk room looking 40 northwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Northwesterly view of converted milk room into guest room. Plate V. Top: Looking northeast through covered porch toward arched entry on courtyard. Bottom: Northwesterly view of original garage and carport.. 41 Plate VI. Top: Northwesterly view of a cross-section. 42 of hollow tile from the demolished courtyard wall. Bottom: Close-up of intact ALBERHILL LOADBI-ARING LAB CO hollow block building tile. Plate VII. Top: Stamp of the Alberhill LA Brick Co. 43 impressed into the hollow block building tile. Bottom: Close-up of concrete "H" blocks used in the construction of Pool House. Plate VIII. Top: Southwesterly view of Pool House and 44 back-filled swimming pool. Bottom: Southeasterly view of deteriorated Pool House roof. PLATES (CONTINUED) Plate IX. Top: Northeasterly view of back-filled pool 45 from Pool House. Bottom: Easterly view of deteriorated diving board at the northeast end of pool. Plate X. Top: 1981 photograph depicting Lookout, Pool, 46 and Pool House (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Close-up of Lookout over cistern looking Northwest as it appears today. iv MANAGEMENT SUMMARY At the request of Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, L LLP, John Minch and Associates has undertaken a focused cultural resources study (historical and architectural) of the Delaney Ranch House complex located within the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. The Delaney Ranch House carries the address of 523 West Minthorn Street and lies within a 2.92 -acre parcel identified as APN 337-350-004. Presently, the house is vacant and has been uninhabited for most of the last 25-30 years. Proposed development plans include demotion of all buildings and structures associated with the ranch to make way for future residential development. A records search of the study area was conducted at the Eastern Information Center at UC Riverside. It indicated that the residential complex had been previously evaluated for historical significance by the Riverside County Historical Commission in 1982 and assigned the status code of 3S (Appears eligible for National Register as an individual properly through survey evaluation). The resource was assigned the Primary # 33-7228. A thorough re-evaluation of the Delaney Ranch house complex comprised extensive background research, interviews and field study. As a result, it was determined that the ranch house was not constructed of adobe brick but of hollow tile and the swimming pool was significantly smaller than Olympic size as first reported. Despite persistent claims of ownership by Hollywood icon Johnny Weissmuller of Tarzan fame, no connection of any kind could be made. An analysis of construction history coupled with the architectural evaluation indicated that the original configuration of the ranch house has been significantly altered through a series of poorly planned additions and other modifications. Additionally, the house has been only sporadically occupied during the last 25 years resulting in extensive vandalism and generally poor upkeep. Thus, the physical integrity of the building is poor to the point that restoration seems infeasible. In applying the criteria for historical and architectural significance contained within the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the Delaney Ranch House complex does not appear eligible for inclusion to either the NRI IP or CRHR. As presently proposed, the Delaney Ranch House and associated structures are slated for demolition. However, since none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered ki architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no adverse impacts to historic resources. Therefore, no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch I -louse, Pool I louse, Pool or Lookout. vi 1. INTRODUCTION The following report was written by John Minch and Associates, Inc. (JMA) at the request of Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASL] V, LLLP. It describes the results of a historical and architectural evaluation of a ranch house complex known as the Delaney Ranch. The vacant property is located at 523 West Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. Current plans call for demolition of the ranch complex in conjunction with future residential development. The study described herein was conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it pertains to the management of cultural resources. The purpose of the evaluation was to establish the historical and architectural significance of the ranch complex which is over 50 years of age. This information is needed since adoption of the proposed demolition plans could result in adverse effects upon one or more of the ranch buildings. Therefore, the ranch complex was evaluated for historical and architectural significance according to the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). The evaluation consisted of. (1) a records search conducted at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), University of California at Riverside, (2) literature review, (3) archival research, (4) interviews, (5) correspondence with the Lake Elsinore Historical Society, (6) survey and architectural analysis of surviving ranch buildings, and (7) determinations of historical and architectural significance at the state and federal levels. The records search and archival research for the project was conducted by Laura S. White, M.A. (RPA & County approved). The intensive survey of the property was performed by Laura S. White (Principal Investigator) and Robert S. White (Project Director, County approved). The Delaney Ranch complex was evaluated for historical and architectural significance by David Van Horn, Ph.D. (Architectural Historian). Dr. Van Horn meets the Secretary of the Interior=s Standards for Architectural History. Qualification statements are provided in Appendix A. Krrse' .,i r,r � � P 6IbpA Ott C� r Imo! V 1 �} S u sreeY MY- ji r t ISPOP yy AAA ] = :_..?' .z,.• a 1� - p7 lZ � f � >'. T'✓ fltOtro �� ! 2 q Lok,,,, Elsinore STk t> 's?�, ` ..: f ✓ moi} _.. �... E i L. "�'-' 1 z {rte7 /7,, nJ GfgoS i 7tll \00� tal (71 xy S� s ;T,7 , nJ �� e 5« 1. III77 1 Figure 1. Regional location of the project area as indicated on a portion of the ,Santa Ana USGS 1:100,000 scale topographic neap sheet (1983). 2 IL STUDY AREA LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENT Regionally, the project area lies on a hilltop approximately one -mile southeast of Highway 74 (Central Avenue) and just east of Interstate 15 in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County (fig. 1). It overlooks Lake Elsinore and the City's historic core. Legally, the subject property lies within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base Meridian as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle (fig. 2). The 2.92 -acre study area is identified as APN 377-350-004. The elongated parcel is oriented northeast -southwest and topographically defined by two hilltops which include the surviving buildings of the ranch complex (fig. 3). Vacant land in the form of numerous foothills transected by off-road trails border the property on the north, east and south. The western boundary is delineated by the paved frontage road for Interstate 15, Camino Del Norte. Originally, the Delaney Ranch comprised numerous buildings and structures spread over 258+acres of fairly rugged terrain. Additional parcels (APNs 377-350-008, -009, and —10) included a caretaker's house, workshop and garage, car barn, stables, hay barn, milk shed, chicken coops and pig styes (figs. 4 and 5). The perimeter of the original ranch boundaries is delineated by 6 -foot chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. III. A BRIEF IIISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF LAKE ELSINORE Much of the historical data regarding Lake Elsinore was drawn from archival research conducted at the Lake Elsinore Branch Library and the Tomas Rivera Library at the University of California at Riverside. The single most important source of information was Tom Hudson's Lake Elsinore Valley, Its Story 1776-1977 (1978). This history of the Elsinore Valley contains a convenient outline for the social and economic development of Lake Elsinore and its environs. A second useful anthology of historic anecdotes may be found in Elizabeth C. James' Elsinore History Vignettes (1973). Other anecdotal historical accounts were published in the local history magazine, The High Country. Lastly, some invaluable sources on places in Riverside County include Jane Gunther's Riverside County Place Nanres, their Origins & their Stories (1984) and Byron & Son's History and Directory of Riverside County 1893-4. (1992). Collectively, these works provide a reasonably thorough background history of the region. 3 3 F R. T 1M G"pi. �> �� t l.$►i# �{St / �r r b� F Stia 1 X fit, .` O R \ NabitA F 1 0 N . A R k. A t NAnb e nm� A� � }j ` Y Figure 2. Study area as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle (1997). 4 f � 5 UC r fi 4 y. � � t l.z i } f � �> �� t l.$►i# �{St / �r r b� F Stia 1 X fit, .` O R \ NabitA F 1 0 N . A R k. A t NAnb e nm� A� � }j ` Y Figure 2. Study area as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle (1997). 4 r fi 4 y. �> �� t l.$►i# �{St / �r r b� F Stia 1 X fit, .` O R \ NabitA F 1 0 N . A R k. A t NAnb e nm� A� � }j ` Y Figure 2. Study area as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle (1997). 4 Figure 3. Study area as shown on aerial photograph. A. Rancho Days In spite of its take and hot springs, the Elsinore Valley was relatively slow to attract the attention of Europeans. In 1797, Fray Juan Santiago set out from Mission San Juan Capistrano in search of a new mission site. He and his party traveled past Lake Elsinore, and probably camped there, on their way to Temecula. They went on to identify the future site of Mission San Luis Rey. According to Hudson, the first pioneer settlement in the region did not take place in the region until 1818 when Leandro Serrano, former majordomo at the Pala chapel, settled in Teniescal Canyon (ibid. 6f.). By 1824, Leandro had built an adobe north of Glen Ivy Hot Springs and this is believed to have been the first private dwelling to be built in what is now Riverside County. Meanwhile, an asiveneia had been built at Temecu (Temecula). Lake Elsinore itself, however, remained in the exclusive hands of its aboriginal occupants. For the next twenty years, the only white men to visit the lake were travelers passing through the Elsinore Valley. Finally, in 1844, Julian Manriquez received a grant to the "Laguna Grande" or Lake Elsinore. The grant, which encompassed the lake, included some 20,000 acres. However, Manriquez seems never to have settled the place and, after several years, sold it to Abel Stearns who regarded the rancho as a real estate investment. In 1858, Stearns sold it to Don Agustin Machado. The Machados were the first family of European descent to settle along the shores of the lake. Machado was a ranchero and although there are no precise records, he doubtless hired many Luiseno to help run the rancho. The Machados immediately began building an adobe near what was the intersection of Machado Street and Grand Avenue (ibid. 9, 14). Today, as the result of road modifications, the location of the adobe is best described as situated at the curve that transitions Grand Avenue to Riverside Drive. That same year, the first Butterfield stage stopped at the Machado rancho. There, the passengers dined and the horses were changed before the stage continued its journey to San Francisco. The Machado ]ionic became a bi-weekly stage stop for the next two years, service finally being terminated as a result of the Civil War. Don Agustin Machado died in 1865, leaving portions of the rancho to his son Juan and to his second wife and her eleven children. During the ensuing eight years, all of the heirs except Juan sold their shares of the rancho. Don Juan Machado built an adobe on his pie -shaped 500 - acre parcel at the northwest corner of the lake. There, lie raised a family and continued to build 6 the herds of livestock begun by his father, DoriJuanMachado's "Rancho Laguna Grande" became the social center for the local ranches at "rodeo" (round -up) time and was well-known for his historical reminisces and the man who first planted Australian eucalyptus trees in the area (Sumner in James 1973:66ff). But the future of the lake as the site of pastoral ranches was short. A severe drought struck California in the late 1870's and by 1881, the lake was nearly dry. In that year, Franklin H. Heald, who was to become the founder of the City of Lake Elsinore, first visited the lake. B. Development of the Town of Elsinore Although it was little more than a mud Mat at the time, the visionary Franklin H. Heald fell in love with the location. He soon learned that the Rancho La Laguna could be purchased from the London and San Francisco Bank for its mortgage of $24,000. Heald lacked the purchase price himself so in 1883 he took two partners, Donald Graham and William Collier. Meanwhile, the California Southern completed its rail line from National City to Colton. Since the railroad would connect with the Santa Fe and points east in 1885, it appeared that the time for development of the lake had finally arrived. In 1884, the name "Elsinore" was selected for the new town, not after the small city in Denmark, "but rather from the immortality given it by Shakespeare and Campbell, and because it had a pleasant sound." The name on the sign of the little railroad station located at the present intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Mission Trail was changed from "Laguna" to "Elsinore." About that time, the first bath was built at the hot spring located at the intersection of Graham Avenue and Spring Street. Plans were laid for a hotel and the town site subdivision, which was located entirely east of Main Street, was surveyed by II.C. Kellogg. Mineral rights under the streets were retained by the subdividers. Town lots were offered for sale at $45 each and farm lots for $25 each. In 1884, the new town consisted of a "general store, three or four small houses, and a few tents" (ibid. 27). However, southern California's land boom was gaining strength and reached fever pitch during the next several years as a result of a passenger price war between the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific. Elsinore's population began to grow accordingly. At the same time, Heald was busy pursuing his plans to make the town a resort. By 1887, Heald had begun construction of the famous Crescent Bath House which was intended to represent the epitome of oriental 7 luxury in southern California. The venture was successful and the new bath house later became an adjunct of the Lake View Hotel (when it became known as the Lake View Bath Houses). Today, the old bath house still stands as the "Chimes" Antique Store. It was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1975. The southern California real estate bubble finally burst in 1888 as buyers evaporated and prices plummeted. Some new town subdivisions went under but Elsinore was able to survive, principally because its economic base was surprisingly diverse for such a small and new community. Aside from the bath house business, coal had been found in several locations not far fi-om town (Collier in James 1973:30ff.). In addition, clay suitable for manufacture of bricks and other ceramic construction materials had been discovered near the coal vein in Warm Springs Valley. The "suburban" town of Terra Cotta was subsequently laid out and, in 1887, received its own Post Office (Hudson 1978:32). C. City of Elsinore (1888-1928) The City of Elsinore was incorporated on April 9, 1888. During the ensuing lean economic years, the clay products business in Terra Cotta helped to sustain the new town. During the early 1890's, the California Coal and Clay Company at Terra Cotta was shipping seven carloads of pipe per week. "In 1892 the plant manufactured ten miles of square groove tiles to be used for underground telephone wires in Los Angeles" (ibid. 33). Clay products manufactured at Terra Cotta continued to support the local economy throughout the century up until 1940 when the Pacific Clay Products Company finally abandoned Terra Cotta in favor of Alberhill. One final important event took place prior to the turn -of -the -century remains to be noted. In 1897, the town got its first municipal water system. In the past, residents had depended upon backyard wells and used sulphur water delivered in barrels to do laundry (sulphur water being excellent for the purpose). The new water system consisted of a well drilled at the north end of Langstaff Street, a pipe leading from the well to a reservoir on a nearby hilltop, and distribution system leading from the reservoir to the town's residential and business districts. The Langstaff Street well produced warm sulphur water. "That was the beginning of Elsinore's famed mineral water system that for many years delivered the controversial water to every household" (Hudson 1978:37). 0 During the first decade of the 20`' century, Elsinore took on the character of a quiet little agricultural community. Truck farming and orchards became important elements in the local economy. Olive growing was another important agricultural activity. C.H. Albers, owner of the Lakeland Ranch on the south side of the lake and for whom Alberhill was named, constructed a pressing, pickling, and canning plant at what is now Lakeland Village. Agricultural and mining activities continued to flourish in Elsinore right up to WWI although Albers moved his olive pressing plant to Riverside in 1917. However, by about 1913, land subdivision and construction were once again becoming economically significant activities. New stores began to go up on Main Street in 1913 and construction of the first lakeshore resort, the Superior Land and Water Company's "Laguna Vista Club House," began the following year. Earlier in 1912, the same company had subdivided "Ford" on the east side of the lake, a tract which later became the Sedco Hills (acronym for South Elsinore Development Company). The Lakedale Hotel was built at the corner of Spring and Limited Streets and burned to the ground in 1894. It was immediately rebuilt as the Lake View Hotel, also known as the Lake View Inn, which stood for almost 75 years before it was razed in 1970. About 1921, the Temescal Water Company was laying plans to divert water From the San Jacinto River in Railroad Canyon to farmers in Corona. Ernest Pickering, successful developer of "Ocean Park" next to Santa Monica, had a financial interest in the Lake View Inn and bathhouse project. He objected to the water district's plans for obvious reasons and assembled a citizen's opposition group. Undaunted, Temescal applied to the State Water Commission for a permit. It was six years before the courts made a compromise decision in favor of Temescal. In the settlement, which is known as the "Tilley Agreement," Temescal was permitted to build a dam in Railroad Canyon. Temescal was also permitted to take the first 2,000 acre feet of water flowing into the drainage in any one year. Depending upon the level of Lake Elsinore, it was permitted to take additional amounts up to 100%. The agreement did not attract as much resentment from the citizens of Elsinore as one might suppose, apparently because the level of the lake happened to be high at the time. The 1920's were prosperous years for Elsinore. The Corona -Elsinore Road was completed in 1924 and the following year, plans were laid for what would become the Ortega Highway connecting Elsinore with San Juan Capistrano on the coast. A number of subdivisions were completed, the most important of which was Clevelin Realty Corporation's development of 9 Country Club Heights. By 1928, Clevelin was buying pipe "by the mile" for water and underground electrical service in the posh new residential area. Country Club Heights' most celebrated resident was the evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson who built the palatial Aimee's Castle." D. Modern Lake Elsinore (1940 -Present) During WW II, Elsinore became the site of a Douglas Aircraft Corporation plant where wings for B-17 bombers were manufactured. At its peak, Douglas was employing 500 hundred people at its new plant. "Housewives and older men were taught to operate drill presses, and for the first time in their lives Elsinore women went off to work wearing pants and carrying lunch buckets" (Ibid. 97). Before the war, the Metropolitan Water District had begun digging a tunnel through the San Jacinto Mountains (today, this tunnel delivers Colorado River water to much of southern California). However, to everyone's surprise, ground water rapidly filled the tunnel and flowed into the San Jacinto River. Temescal attempted to claim this water as "vagrant" but Elsinore won a suit claiming it as part of the natural flow of the river that belonged to the lake. During the war, Metropolitan diverted the tunnel water to Lake Mathews. In 1944, Mr. Nat McKee, new owner of the old Crescent Bath house and Aimee's Castle, became interested in the problem. McKee organized the Elsinore Water Protective Association for the purpose of pressing a claim for a share of the tunnel water and to recover some of the water lost as a result of the Tilley Agreement. Although their initial suit was never carried through due to lack of funds, the Association's efforts ultimately resulted in the creation of the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) which continued to press the claim for tunnel water. In 1950, the EMWD became a branch of the huge Metropolitan Water District (MWD) but with the proviso that all tunnel water would be managed by the EMWD. Unfortunately for Elsinore, the EMWD did not plan to distribute water in the Elsinore Valley. There was talk of legal proceedings but nothing ever came of it. Development had begun to pick up following the war, particularly at Lakeland Village on the southwest side of the lake. But although no one could have been aware of it at the time, the lake had begun to dry up. In 1948, the fish began dying and washing ashore and residents suffered from a plague of gnats spawned as a result of the lake's low water level. Although there 10 was substantial rain in 1952, the gnat infestation problem repeated itself when the lake went completely dry in 1954. Meanwhile the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) which had been formed in 1950, was considering joining the Eastern Municipal Water District in order to become eligible to receive Colorado River water. But heavy rains came in 1954 and the voters west of the EMWD boundary voted in favor of formation of their own area -wide Western Municipal Water District. That same year, the Western Municipal Water District became part of the Metropolitan Water District and, therefore, became eligible for Colorado River water. The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District was given the responsibility of distributing the new water. While Elsinore and the state were struggling over the public water supply, the lake had gone completely dry. In 1962, the state legislature budgeted for money to put Colorado River water into the lake. This event took place in 1964 using MWD water from its aqueduct at Lakeview. Water from the aqueduct flowed down the San Jacinto River, down Railroad Canyon, and into the desiccated lake. However, by 1966 it had become clear this enterprise could not be satisfactorily sustained due to a pervasive drought and increasing demand for domestic water. At the end of the year, three 1800 -foot wells were drilled for the purpose of providing water to the lake. Aside from rains, these wells have been the lake's exclusive source of water ever since. In 1972, the name of the town was changed to "Lake Elsinore" by popular vote. During the 1970's and 80's Lake Elsinore and its neighboring towns continued to develop. Completion of Interstate 15 encouraged commuters to adopt Lake Elsinore as a "bedroom community." Shopping centers have been built near the mouth of Railroad Canyon and large residential areas have grown up in the nearby communities of Canyon Lake, Sun City, Wildomar, Murrieta, and Temecula. Although the days of the bath houses are over, the lake still draws many weekend visitors. D Lake Elsinore Celebrity Homeowners and Visitors According to Ms. Jean Corral, local historian and long time resident of Lake Elsinore, over the past century, several celebrities are known to have lived or vacationed in the Lake Elsinore area. Some of the most notable included: 1) the family of 1920s child star, Jackie Coogan, 2) weekend visitor and Elsinore property owner Bela Lugosi (1930s), 3) Dorothy Cottrell, author of "Singing Gold," and 4) 1910s silent screen western actor, William S. Hart, owned a house locally where he vacationed in during the summer (Rathbun 2005). Often regarded as the most famous and glamorous Lake Elsinore resident was the evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson, founder of the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. In 1929, she had the palatial retreat known as "Aimee's Castle" constructed for her. This Moorish -style castle with mosaic ceilings overlooks Lake Elsinore and comprises six bedrooms, five baths, prayer tower, and underground catacombs. Ms. McPherson died in 1944 but her castle still stands today (ibid.). Other celebrities and movie stars known to have visited or vacationed at Elsinore in the 1920s included Will Rogers (humorist) and Carrie Jacobs Bond (composer and lyricist). 1930s and 1940s stars included Frank Morgan, Clark Gable and Andy Devine, and Olympic swimmer turn actor, Johnny Weissmuller (Williams 2009). Actor Steve McQueen was a frequent visitor in the 1960s and 1970s while on his many motorcycle excursions throughout southern California. He also participated in the Lake Elsinore Grand Prix and co-produced the locally filmed motorcycle documentary "On Any Sunday." (Rathbun 2005, Ghiotto 2011). IV. HISTORIC RESOURCE LISTINGS A. Historic Resources Records Search A records search of the study area was conducted by Laura White at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), University of California at Riverside. The search entailed a review of all previously recorded historic resources situated within the project area. Additionally, the National Register of Historic Places (NR14P), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and the California Directory of Properties (DOP, aka the Historic Resources Inventory [HRI]) were reviewed for the purpose of identifying historic properties. The results of the search indicated that no listed National Register of Historic Places (NRNP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), or California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) properties have been recorded within the study area. However, the California DOP does list the property address (523 West Mintho n Street, Lake Elsinore) as an historic resource (Primary #33-7228; Appendix B). 12 The study area was recorded by Pat Meredith of the Riverside County Historical Commission in 1982. The site form describes the residence at 523 West Minthorn Street as a 6,500 square foot Mediterranean/Spanish Revival style home that is U-shaped in plan with a courtyard. Other features include a Spanish -tile gabled roof, stucco siding over 18 -inch adobe walls, double -hung windows, an arched entry, and milk shed with cooling tower. An associated gabled -roofed gazebo, Olympic -sized swimming pool, and a cabana with five dressing rooms and two restrooms are located on an adjacent hilltop. All of the above-mentioned buildings and structures are located within the elongated, 2.92 -acre parcel identified as APN 377-350-004. Other ranch related features (sheds, corrals, and stables) for livestock are located further to the east within APN 377-350-008. Ms. Meredith stated that the residential complex dated to 1928 and that the builder was A.J. Delaney. With regard to significance, the style, size and components to the residential complex contributed to it being recognized as "one of the best examples of Mediterranean/Spanish style homes built in the late 1920's building boom. Its gazebo, cabana, and Olympic -sized swimming pool make it unique in the Lake Elsinore Valley." (Meredith 1982). The DOP listing indicates that the 523 West Minthorn Sheet address has been assigned the California Historic Resources Status Code of (3S) "Appears eligible for NR (National Register) as an individual property through survey evaluation." Sources consulted for the resource included Tom Hudson's Lake Elsinore Valley, its story 1776-1977 (1978). Within Chapter 9 of his book on "Palatial Homes and Spas] 928-1932," Hudson made the brief statement "Among others are the spacious home built by A.J. Delaney on a hill at the head of Main Street"... To date, this is the sole published reference to the property. While conducting the initial survey in 1981, the Riverside County Historical Commission was given a copy of "Description of the Property and Investment Objectives" for the 246 -acre West Minthorn Street property by real estate broker, Gregory A. Block of Bitkower Associates, Inc. on behalf of the property owner, Missing Link 11. Situated upon the land is a 6,500 square foot, 43 year old Spanish mansion, with an Olympic size swimming pool, cabanas and gazebo, as well as approximately 20 horse corrals, sheds and stables. The home itself is in excellent condition but is in need of some exterior painting. Structurally, it is constructed of 18" thick block -adobe walls. It is equipped with an industrial kitchen, 13 including a full line of stainless steel sinks, freezer, refrigerators and a butcher block food prep area ... The Seller currently resides in the mansion, but will vacate it upon closing of escrow of our purchase (Bitkower Realtors 1981:6). Investment objectives of the Partnership included the possible conversion of the residence into a fine restaurant, in the nature of a "Cask `N Cleaver" or "Stuart Anderson" type of establishment. Copies of the Primary record for 523 West Minthorn Street, the "Description of the Property and Investment Objectives" and black and white photos taken during the survey of the property were generously provided by Mr. Keith Herron, Resources Bureau Chief, Riverside County Parks and Open Space District. B. City of Lake Elsinore Historical Resources Section 4.7 (Historic Preservation) of the 2011 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan was reviewed for Cultural and Historic Resources. Under the City's Historic Built Environment Category, the Delaney Estate (located north of Lake Elsinore) is listed as an "Unofficially Recognized Significant Historic Resource." Other buildings listed under the same heading include: Aimee's Castle, The Machado Adobe and Butterfield Stage Stop, Alberhill School, The Cannery, and Elsinore Naval Military Academy (General Plan 2011:617.). V. HISTORICAL SOCIETY CORRESPONDENCE In an effort to learn more about the architectural/historical importance of 523 West Minthorn Street property, a letter of inquiry was sent to Ms. Ruth Atkins, President of the Lake Elsinore Historical Society (Appendix C). On May 6, 2013 a letter response was received. To summarize, Ms. Atkins stated that the historical society had nothing in their files on the Minthorn Street address. However, they do know of several locals "who swear they know this property belonged to Johnny Weissmuller or refer to it as Tarzan's House." The time he supposedly visited the Lake Elsinore area was in the years after he participated in the Olympic Games and at the beginning of his movie career." Furthermore, "Everything we know about it is hearsay and cannot be verified." (Atkins 2013:pers. comm.). Telecommunications with community historian Ms. Jean Corral, long time resident of Lake Elsinore (since 1964), and a member of the Historical Society resulted in a similar finding. 14 She had no specific historical or architectural knowledge to offer on the 523 W. Minthorn Street residence. Furthermore, what information she had heard about Johnny Weissmuller was now heat -say as these informants have all passed away (Corral 2013:pers. comm.). VI. LAND PATENTS Archival research also included a review of land patents on file with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in their Moreno Valley office. The subject parcel is situated within the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of fractional Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base Meridian. FILM General Land Office records indicate that two land patents have been recorded for the study area. The first patent, which covers all of Section 5, was issued to Abel Stearns in 1851 as part of the larger, 13,337.84 acre La Laguna Rancho. The acreage was acquired under authority of the Spanish/Mexican Land Grant dated March 3, 1851 (9 Stat. 631). The patent is recorded as Document # Plc 495 (Accession # CACAAA 083219). The second patent comprising 40 acres (Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5) was issued to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company. It was pail of 71,268.54 acres acquired under the authority of the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Grant of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292). The land patent is recorded as Document #23, Accession # CACAAA 072835. VII. HISTORIC MAP RESEARCH Historic maps of the Lake Elsinore area were also reviewed for the purpose of identifying locations of potential historic resources. This included an examination of the 1880 U.S. General Land Office (GLO) plat map for Township 6 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base Meridian on file with the California Desert District office of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management located in Moreno Valley. Several United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps on file in the Map Room of the Science Library at the University of California at Riverside were also inspected. These included: 1) the 1901 Elsinore 30' USGS Quadrangle (surveyed 1897-98), the 1942 Lake Elsinore 15' Quadrangle (Corps. of Engineers, U.S. Army, War Department), and the 1953 Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle. Other maps consulted included a 200 -scale map dated 1972 for Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM that was acquired from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The 1925-1933 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map for Elsinore, 15 Riverside County (digital version) was also reviewed on-line from the San Diego Public Library. Unfortunately, the property lay just outside the map coverage area. All information gleaned from the various maps is presented below. An inspection of the General Land Office Plat Map for Township 6 South, Range 4 West shows the lake and portion of Abel Stearns' Rancho La Laguna. In addition, a dirt road is indicated paralleling the north side of the San Jacinto River through what is today Railroad Canyon. Section 5 (location of study area) as well as several adjoining sections is illustrated as being quite hilly. It appears to include five government lots (1 through 5) that range in size between 25-30 acres. Remaining section land is divided into 40, 80 and 160 acre parcels. No structures or man-made features are delineated within the study area. A review of the 1901 Elsinore 30' USGS Quadrangle indicates that the core of Elsinore is well-established with a well-developed grid of roads and streets. The California Southern Railroad is shown extending through Railroad Canyon. Also indicated between Elsinore Junction and Alberhill is California Southern's Elsinore-Alberhill railroad spur line which was a direct result of the coal and clay operations in the area. No structures or man-made features are delineated within the study area. The 1942 Lake Elsinore 15' U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, War Dept. Quadrangle indicates the same conditions as the 1901 Elsinore map but with the addition of more extensive roads and additional development. The new community of North Elsinore has also been established northeast of the City. Portions of Route 71, Route 74 and Highway 395 are indicated along Lakeshore Drive, Central Avenue, and Mission Trail. Nearby Railroad Canyon Dam and Railroad Canyon Reservoir are also depicted. As the California Southern Railroad tracks were abandoned through Railroad Canyon in 1935, they are no longer illustrated. however, the aforementioned spur line has now been replaced with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe line. Situated just north of the end of Main Street, the 1942 map shows the hills of the study area covered by a myriad of dirt roads. However, no structures of any kind are delineated on the property although they were certainly present at the time. This is not surprising as on numerous occasions, government maps (specifically U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) have chosen to excluded certain building locations from their war department maps. A review of the 1953 Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangles show that conditions have not significantly changed since publication of the 1942 Lake Elsinore map. The 16 region is composed of scattered rural development with a higher concentration in the urban core of Elsinore. The road system through the area continues to expand with both new and improved roads/streets. An inspection of the study area continues to show a pattern of dirt roads connecting the various hilltops over the entire, 258+acre Delaney Ranch property. However, unlike the previous map, this one clearly shows the location of the main house and pool (labeled "swimming Pool"), The 1972 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation map for Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West is the best and most informative of all the maps. The 200 - scale map, clearly delineates the specific locations of the various buildings and structures that were spread out across the entire 258 -acre Delaney Ranch property (fig. 4). For accuracy, Ms. White consulted with Mr. Reed Webb (son of Serveo Ranches partner, E. Ray Webb) for the labeling of each building/structure location. As a comparison today, one can see the livestock area was situated quite a distance to the east of the house (in recently quarried canyon, figure 5). Flies must have been one consideration. In any event, the map is also important as it shows the site of the former ranch caretaker's house (at the base of hill). VIII. PROPERTY HISTORY Research on the history of the subject property was conducted at the County of Riverside Robert J. Fitch Archives in Moreno Valley and the adjacent Riverside County Assessor -Clerk - Recorder office. Specific data procured from these County facilities included: 1) Property ownership entries from 1920-1970 Lot Books, 2) Grantee -Grantor records, and 3) pertinent deeds. In addition, the history sections of the Riverside Public Library (main library) and the Lake Elsinore Branch Library were examined. Specific sources consulted included literary works by Tom Hudson (Lake Elsinore Valley, its story 1776-1977 [1978]) and Elizabeth C. James (Elsinore History Vignettes [1973]). The Elsinore Leader -Press newspaper was also inspected (in microfilm format) for the years 1928-1932 as was the Index to the collection of Tom Patterson's "Out of the County's Past" column from the Press -Enterprise (dated 1978- 1996). Other news/history magazines (The High Counity and La Laguna Revue) were also consulted. 17 1 1 1 2 t \ 57, v 1 Figure 4. 1972 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Map of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West showing locations of various buildings and structures located within the Delaney Ranch complex (200 -scale map). 18 Figure 5. Recent aerial showing former locations of ranch building and structures. 19 Supplemental information was drawn from city directories and online databases (U.S. Federal Census records, California Voter Registration (1900-1968), California Death Index from 1940-1997, the Social Security Death Index) accessed through Ancestsy.com. Lastly, valuable information was obtained through interviews with relatives of the previous ranch owners. These included Mr. H. Reed Webb, Mr. Jon Westerlund, and Mr. Roy J. Horton. A. Compilation of Parcels by the Hahn Family Unlike most properties within Riverside County, no early tract maps were found for the study area. However, as previously indicated in the land patent section of the report (Section VI), after forming a part of the Rancho La Laguna, the Southern Pacific Land Company was granted portions of Section 5. During the 1920s, the Elsinore (now Lake Elsinore) area was becoming a popular vacation destination primarily due to its recreational lake and mineral baths. Consequently, families came looking to buy investment property. In 1923, John Hahn of Los Angeles purchased Government Lots 3 (26.90 ac.) and Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) in the eastern foothills of Section 5 overlooking the lake from the railroad. Within a few short years, he had acquired an additional 205-x- acres of contiguous property (see Table 1). According to the 1910 U.S. Federal Census, John Hahn was born in Germany in 1870 and immigrated to the United States in 1895. California Voter Registration (1900-1968) for Los Angeles County indicated that Mr. Hahn was trained as an Engineer. He and his wife, Johanne (also from Germany and a dressmaker) resided at 1338 E. 56`" Street in Los Angeles. However, just as fast as the Hahns acquired parcels, they were selling them. This began with Mr. Hahn selling off Government Lots 3 and 4 in 1926. Subsequently, Mrs. Hahn was forced to sell the remaining acreage (200{- acres) following her husband's death. This property was also conveyed to A.J. Delaney of Long Beach. B. A.J. Delaney and the 258+ Acre Elsinore Ranch Arthur Joy Delaney was a native of West Virginia. I -Ie was born in the community of Wetzel in 1883 and was the eldest of three children born to Wesley and Mary Criswell Delaney (1900 U.S. Census). Presumably, Arthur received an education in West Virginia as he remained there at least to the age of 17 (ibid.). Subsequently, he married Golda Pearl Long of Pine Grove, West Virginia. The couple ventured west to southern California circa 1905. The 1910 U.S. 20 Census indicated that they were living on Gilmore Lane in Cahuenga, Los Angeles County with their first child, Norma Delaney and Arthur was a manager of an oil company. His 1917-1918 Draft Registration Card indicates that he was a resident of Montebello and was employed as an oil worker for Petroleum Industry Company of Los Angeles. Table 1. Property ownership records from 1923-1929 Date Lot/Parcel Book/Paye Owners Land Buildings Acreage 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 Value Value 1923-25 3 17/24 John Hahn --- ---- 26.90ac " 4 17/24 John Hahn --- ---- 26.11 ac. 1926-29 3 17/23 A. J. Delaney --- ---- 26.90ac " 4 17/23 A. J. Delaney --- ---- 26.11 ac 1926-27 1 17/23 John Hahn --- ---- 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 John Hahn --- ---- 27.66ac. " 5 17/23 John Hahn --- ---- 29.76ac. " Sl/2NEI/4 17/23 John Hahn --- ---- 80.00ac. SEI/4NW1/4 17/23 John Hahn --- ---- 40.00ac. 1928-29 1 17/23 Johanne Hahn 80 ---- 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 Johanne Hahn 40 ---- 27.66ac. " 5 17/23 Johanne Hahn 450 ---- 29.76ae. " Sl/2NEI/4 17/23 Johanne Hahn 240 ---- 80.00ac. " SEI/4NWI/4 17/23 Johanne Ilahn 120 ---- 40,00ac. By 1920, the Delaney family was complete with four children (Norma, Louis, Doris, and Patricia). Arthur met continued success in the oil business and the Delaneys moved to Long Beach (Cherry Avenue and then Atlantic Avenue). In the early 1920s, Perry Vandervort was partners with Arthur in the oil refinery business on Signal Hill (Independent Press -Telegram 1960). On November 10, 1926, the Delaney Petroleum Corporation was incorporated with a registered address of 695 East 27°i Street, Room 5, Long Beach (California Secretary of State 2013a). City directories indicate that A.J. Delaney was president of the corporation with J.R. Covington serving as secretary and treasurer. By 1930, Mr. A.J. Delaney had purchased all 258.86 acres from the I Jahn family which included: Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM (Table 2). It is 21 believed that Mr. Delaney was the property owner who had the entire property professionally fenced. Most likely it was erected prior to the construction of the main house. According to County records, there is no building activity noted between 1930-1934 within the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 where the ranch house is located. The first time a building value appears is in 1935 with a value of $480. Between 1936-1938, this is followed by a value of $11530. Therefore, it is believed that that although A.J. Delaney owned the property in 1930, the ranch house was not under construction until five years later in 1935 (see table). This information was confirmed with Mr. James Hofer, Archives Manager of the Robert J. Fitch Archives (see Table 2). Table 2. Property ownership records from 1930-1946. Date Lot/Parcel Book/Page Owners Land Buildings Acreage Value Value 1930-31 1 17/23 A.J. Delaney 80 ---- 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 A.J. Delaney 40 ---- 27.66ac. " 3 17/23 A.J. Delaney 130 390 26.90ac. " 4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 130 6000 26.11 ac. " 5 17/23 A.J. Delaney 600 1600 29.76ac. " Sl/2NEI/4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 240 ---- 80.00ac. " SEI/4NW1/4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 240 ---- 40.00ac. 1932-35 1 17/23 A.J. Delaney 105 ---- 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 A.J. Delaney 255 --- 27.66ac. " 3 17/23 A.J. Delaney 180 1725 26.90ac. " 4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 180 8925 26.11 ac. " 5 17/23 A.J. Delaney 810 2175 29.76ac. " Sl/2NEI/4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 165 ---- 80.00ac. " SEI/4NW1/4 17/23 A.J. Delaney 330 480* 40.00ac 1936-46 1 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 100 ---- 28.43ac. " 2 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 250 ---- 27.66ac. 3 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 180 2120 26.90ac. " 4 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 180 ---- 26.11 ae. " 5 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 810 2200 29.76ac. " S1/2NEI/4 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 160 810 80.00ac. " SEI/4NW1/4 17/23 Delaney Petroleum Corp. 330 11530* 40.00ac. * building values indicating presence of ranch house 22 Arthur Joy Delaney died in Torrance in November of 1955. His son, Louis A. "Bud" Delaney followed on in his father's footsteps and was both Vice President of the Delaney Petroleum Corporation and Secretary/Treasurer of Halo Oil Producers, Inc. in Long Beach (Independent Press -Telegram 1958). According to Roy Horton, the Elsinore ranch property was used as a second home or summer house for the Delaney family. Although Arthur Delaney's wife thought it was too rustic, Roy's mother loved the ranch (Horton 2013:pers.comm.). After all, it was where Roy's mother Patricia Joy Delaney (youngest daughter of Arthur and Golda Delaney) met his father Wesley R. Horton. Patricia or "Patsy" would often ride the ranch horses down to Elsinore High School and watch Wesley during football practice. They soon became sweethearts. Wesley was 18 and Patsy was 15 (Horton 2013:pers. comm.). After graduating from Elsinore High School, Arthur Delaney gave Wesley a job as an oil worker in the Delaney oil fields. This was while Patsy was finishing her education at Polytechnic High School in Long Beach. Roy said that his mother had her own driver that would take her to and from high school every day. Eventually, Wesley Horton tired of the oil business and announced that he wanted to become a mortician. This news did not go over well with Patsy's family. According to Roy, there was "no way Arthur Delaney's youngest daughter was going to many a mortician." (ibid.). Instead, Wesley was encouraged to try banking and started out as an Assistant Cashier at Farmers & Merchants Bank in Long Beach. This led him to pursue a career in banking where he became Vice President and Manager of the Farmers & Merchants Bank. Wesley R. Horton died in 2011 followed by Patricia Delaney Horton in April of 2013. Both are buried in the Elsinore Valley Cemetery in Lake Elsinore (Long Beach Press - Telegram 2013). C. The Frey Family In 1947, the Delaney Petroleum Corporation sold Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM to Carl C. Frey and his wife Blanche A. Frey. The couple only owned the property for two years (1947-1948). U.S. City Directories for the South Pasadena area indicated that Carl Frey was a Designer between 1938-1940. The 1940 U.S. Federal Census 23 listed Carl as "Head Designer." hn 1946 they moved to Burbank and by 1952 they were living in Phoenix, Arizona. It is believed that Carl Clarence Frey died in Butte County in October of 1959 (California Death Index, 1940-1997). His widow, Blanche continued to live in Chico, Butte County, California until her death. D. Carter and Green For the years 1949-1951, the property owners of Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM were Richard A. Carter and Roy C. Green. Unfortunately, no real information about the partners could be found. The only reference to Roy C. Green was a 1947 Santa Ana City Directory. Listed under the Spouse category is the name "G.G. Sanitarium Green." E. The Atkinson Family For one brief year (1952) George E. Atkinson, Jr. and his wife Alice were the listed property owners of Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.). Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM. The 1951 City Directory for Long Beach indicated that Mr. Atkinson was an attorney residing on California Avenue. Sometime in the early 1990s, the family moved to Paramount. In an interview with Mr. Reed Webb, he stated that he was familiar with the Long Beach attorney's name (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). F. Partnership of Webb, Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note/Servco Between 1947-1948, a company known as Servco of Long Beach was formed by four partners: E. Ray Webb, Paul Westerlund, Raymond Mahan, and Charles O. Van Note. Each individual brought their expertise to the partnership. Mr. Westerlund was an Attorney, E. Ray Webb was a Mechanical Engineer, Mr. Mahan had a Ph.D. in Chemistry, and Mr. Van Note was a Petroleum Engineer. 24 The four partners developed a specialized drilling collar for the petroleum industry fashioned from an alloy of nickel, copper and aluminum known as K Monel. This nonmagnetic alloy was age-hardenable and could be heat-treated after finishing to produce a material that was both corrosion -resistant and extra strong. It was useful to the oil industry in that it could be used as a drilling collar that housed instruments necessary for directional drilling. The drill collar was patented by The Servco Company (Patent number 3476415 was patented on November 4, 1969; Charles O. Van Note -Inventor). It was an expensive item that was leased to drilling companies. Servco was eventually purchased by Smith International in 1968 (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). In the early 1950s, the Servco partners (dba Servco Ranches) were looking for investment property in Arizona but settled on Elsinore in Riverside County. The lake was completely dry at that time and as a result property was quite cheap. According to Mr. Webb, the property was purchased from the "Rockwood School For Boys" (ibid.). However, a review of the Grant Deed clearly indicates that in 1953, the 258 -acre property comprising Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, 'Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM was transferred directly to the partners from the Atkinsons. No reference to the Boys School could be found. ht 1955 the partners formed The Servco Foundation, a domestic nonprofit corporation (California Secretary of State 2013b). Three years later, they carved out the 2.92 -acre parcel that appears today and what is referred as the study area. The legal description is "Beginning 417.18' NE of SW corner of SE 1/4 of NW '/4, the NW 82', NE 73', NE 603.11% SE 170.52', SW 745.36', NW 98'to Point of Beginning (POB). Land value in 1959 for this parcel was $100 while it had an improvement/building value of $21,930. G. The YMCA and Subsequent Owners On April 3, 1973, The Servco Foundation and surviving relatives of the Webb, Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note families conveyed all of the Elsinore property (258 acres) as a "gift" to the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) of Greater Long Beach (Document # 42031). Mr. Clyde L. Bronn served as manager for the YMCA. There are approximately nine other separate deeds (one per surviving relative) on file for the transfer. 25 Within a year of receiving the ranch from The Servco Foundation, the YMCA conveyed the property to the Mobil Oil Corporation. Some of the latter owners included Leroy and Vera Baughman of Sun City (1978), Missing Link Investor B, a limited partnership of Lake Elsinore (1981), and Spyglass Ranch, LLC of Newport Beach (2004). IX. THE DELANEY RANCH COMPLEX When Arthur J. Delaney owned the property there were at the very least horses and milking cows on the ranch. They were stabled quite a distance to the east of the ranch house complex. However, livestock totals grew substantially when the Servco partners acquired the property. According to Reed Webb, there were many horses, about 20 pigs, 14 sheep, 100-200 turkeys, 2,000 chickens and several peacocks (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). It is not known if Delaney had a ranch caretaker but it would be fair to assume so. It is known that from the early 1950s to the early 1970s, that the Servco partners employed two caretakers. The caretaker's house was located below the large ranch house at the base of the hill (fig. 4). This structure is believed to have been demolished in the early 1980s as a result of new highway construction. Nothing is known about the origin of the house other than it may have predated the Delaney's ranch house. Initially, Mr. Al Yorba and his wife Edith? served as the ranch caretakers in the early to mid 1950s. Apparently, Mr. Yorba was quite the rancher and came highly recommended (ibid.). In addition to the numerous animals, there was also a lot of planting and watering to be done. The 1958-1959 Riverside County Directory indicated that a second caretaker, Mr. Winfield Scott Brownell (aka Winfield Hastings) and his wife Joy were managers of Servco Ranch. The Brownells remained the ranch caretakers through 1973 when the Servco Foundation donated the ranch to the YMCA. In addition to the Webb, Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note families, the ranch was enjoyed by members of the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Church Youth Groups, and the American Field Service (AFS) as the ranch house had several rooms described as dormitories. X. FIELD SURVEY A field survey of the project site for historic resources took at intervals during June and July, 2013. Field personnel included Laura S. White, M.A. and Robert S. White. The intensive survey was conducted by thoroughly examining the built environment within the subject 2.92- 26 acre parcel. This included an examination of the existing ranch house at 523 W. Minthorn Street, nearby pool house, swimming pool, and "lookout tower". Field notes and photographs were taken of all standing buildings and structures located within APN 377-350-004. Outside the parcel, locations of former ranch buildings and structures were briefly inspected using the 200 -scale Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation map of Section 5 as a guide. XI. BUILDING RECORDS FOR THE STUDY AREA Building records for the study area were procured from Mr. Michael Sprang, Senior Appraiser, Agricultural Division, with the Riverside County Assessor -Clerk -Recorder. Initial county appraisal records for the property date to 1967. At this time, the effective year or date of construction for the residence was listed as 1930. The building description indicates that the residence measures 3816 sq. ft. and comprises 4 bedrooms, 2 dormitories, and 3 baths. Other rooms include a living room, dining room, sunroom (solarium), kitchen, utility room, and 2 entry halls. The appraiser noted the following: ...Excellent plaster work throughout house. Walls constructed of hollow tile. Stuccoed exterior with 2 x 4 framework on interior with lath and plaster. Creates very thick walls (Riverside County Assessor 1967). Other buildings recorded under the heading "Miscellaneous Structures" included: 1) a swimming pool and reservoir (cistern), 2) pool house, and 3) "Lookout tower." XII. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF 523 W. MINTHORN STREET COMPLEX A. Ranch House Originally, this single -story ranch house was U-shaped in plan with covered porches and a central courtyard (plates 1-I11). As originally conceived, the architectural style of the house is best described as Spanish Eclectic as the fagade was symmetrical rather than asymmetrical as found in the Spanish Revival style. Many of the same architectural elements such as low-pitched roofs clad in red tile, stucco covered walls, and arched entries are shared by Spanish Eclectic, Spanish Revival and Mission Revival. 27 Today, the building is very irregular in plan as several additions such as dormitories and guest rooms have been added over the years. The classic low-pitched gable roof is clad with a double layer of red clay tiles. Minimal, overhanging eaves have rounded rafter tails and attic vents consist of the cell or concavity portion of hollow tiles. Shed roof porches with open beam ceilings front the courtyard and are covered with red clay tile. Porch roof supports comprise stucco pillars that are also likely constructed of hollow tile (plate V:top). The porch walkways comprise large, rectangular clay tiles. In addition to a semi -circular arched opening, there were three large, thick and heavy solid wood doors in the inner patio area. Outside, there were two paneled doors for the solarium and kitchen (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). Fenestration consists of square, metal -framed two -over -two double hung sashes. An interior chimney which accommodated two, back to back hearths is located midway along the southwest portion of the residence. The chimney is clad in stucco and has three terra cotta flue extensions (plate Ill). Attached to the west end of the main house is a large, shed roof addition that extends outward over the slope. It comprises a sun room or solarium and balcony (plate IV:bottom). The specific date of construction of the addition is not known. However, it was there in 1953 when the Servco partners purchased the property. The dead space below the solarium was converted into a "smoke room" where meat was preserved and another area for curing cheese (Westerlund 2013:pers. conn., Webb 2013:pers. comm.). Originally, there were two garages separated by a carport. The closest one to the courtyard was later converted into a large dormitory sometime in the mid 1950s by the Servco partners (plate ll:bottom). In addition, the milk room attached to the back of the kitchen was turned into guest quarters (plate IV). The house and all of the subsequent additions with exception of the sun room are constructed upon concrete slabs. All original exterior walls and some interior, are constructed from 12" x 12" x 8" hollow tile (plate VI and plate Vll:top). Each tile has 6 concavities or cells that measure 2 3/4" x 3". Tiles are stamped "Alberhill Loadbearing LAB Co." As indicated, these particular hollow tiles were manufactured locally by the LA Brick Co. in Alberhill (Plate VII). Briefly, hollow building tiles were commonly used for building construction during the first quarter of the 201" century. Since stucco was usually the exterior covering, Mission and Mediterranean revival styles are some of the most common types of homes built with the blocks (Kibbe] 2004). In November of 1915, plans were drawn for a new firebrick plant in Alberhill. 28 These plans also included hollow -tile dwellings for the workers and a townsite. Construction of the plant began in August of 1916 and two months later, Plant Number 4 of the Los Angeles Pressed Brick Company was completed. Harvey Gardner was the plant superintendent, R.S. Stone, assistant superintendent (Mosier 2010). Overall, the ranch house complex is in poor condition. Only sporadically occupied over the last 25 -years, the ravages of time and vandalism including various interior and exterior demolitions and unfinished modifications have taken their toll on the building. Today, the integrity of the ranch house is tenuous at best and has reached a point where it appears to be impractical to restore. B. Pool Ilouse Located on the hilltop to the northeast of the ranch house is the Pool House (Plate VIII). This northwest -southeast oriented building is rectangular in plan and lies just southwest of the swimming pool. It rests on a concrete slab and is constructed of 11 -pattern cement blocks (12" x 12" x 3 1/2") with two horizontal cavities (plate VlEbottom) that are coated with thick plaster. The building has a low-pitched gable roof that is planked and covered with clay tiles (many of which are missing or broken). Eaves have exposed rafter tails and fenestration comprises rectangular openings with either modern double hung sashes orjust window screen. Fronting the pool is a series of five private changing rooms (two that included plumbing for toilets). Entrances to these rooms are sheltered by a covered patio supported by a series of four, elliptically -shaped arches. The structure is in very poor condition (plate VIII). C. Swimming Pool The concrete pool is rectangular in shape and oriented northeast -southwest. It has inside dimensions of 30' x 90' which are nowhere close to those of an Olympic size pool (82' x 164') as previously recorded (Meredith 1982). For safety reasons, the pool has been filled in with soil and appears to have been this way for decades. Located at the northeast end of the pool is a redwood plank diving board on concrete pedestals (plate IX). Based upon its presence, this end of the pool most likely had a depth of at least 8 feet. According to Mr. Webb: 29 ...If we kept the pump running, the cistern would overflow into a 4 -inch pipe that extended over the swimming pool and this was used to fill the huge 30' x 90' pool. The pool was used then as a reservoir for all of the very extensive landscape irrigation around the house and over to the livestock area in the middle of the ranch. It was always a favorite to float under the overflow spout with water tumbling at least ten or twelve feet down into the pool. I can remember being told that it was expensive to fill the pool because of the power used and the cost of the water that could get algae buildup if left unattended for too long." (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). D. The "Lookout" and Cistern A 12' x 12' structure is located upslope just northwest of the swimming pool. From this vantage point, one could sit and enjoy the spectacular view of Lake Elsinore (ibid.). The top half Of the structure includes an elevated platform with tile floor and open beam construction. The gabled roof is fashioned from 1" x 6" tongue -and -groove and covered with clay tiles. It is supported by four stucco clad pillars. The lower half of the structure is concrete and houses the cistern (plate X). Access to the water feature is from a square hatch centrally located at the rear of the structure. From below the access hatch sill, the cistern is 8 feet deep. Water for the cistern was pumped uphill from a large electric pump located at the base of the hill below the main house in the vicinity of the Caretaker's house. Water was then piped down to the house for domestic use (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). XIII. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY The Delaney Ranch House situated at 523 W. Minthorn Street (Primary # 33-7228) was first evaluated for historical/architectural significance in 1982 by the Riverside County Historical Commission. At that time, the residence was said to be of adobe construction and represent "one of the best examples of Mediterranean/Spanish style homes built in the late 1920s building boom. Its gazebo, cabana, and Olympic -size swimming pool make it unique in the Lake Elsinore Valley" (Meredith 1982). Consequently, the complex was assigned a California Historical Resource Status Code of 3S "Appears eligible for NR as an individual property through survey evaluation." However, this high status code (the lower the number the higher or more significant the status code) is the result of some misinformation. 30 The residence was re -visited by JMA in 2013 at which time it was re-evaluated for significance under two separate legislative sources: 1) the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), which includes criteria for eligibility to the National Register of I Iistoric Places (NRNP), and 2) the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which includes criteria for California Register of Historical Resources (CRI IR) eligibility. A. National Register of] listoric Places (NRNP) Evaluation In order for an historic resource to be significant pursuant to Federal law, it must be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). Generally, listing in the NRIIP requires that a building or structure be at least 50 years old and that it possess "The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture ... present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, material, workmanship, feeling, and association ..." and ... (A) That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history or (13) That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or (C) That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or (D) That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." B California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) Evaluation According to California law, only significant historic resources require consideration beyond the identification stage in the environmental review process. Significant historical resources "are resources which are listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR: Ca. Code of Regs. §15064.5). In addition, "Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical 31 resource"...if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the CRHR. An eligible resource is one which: (A) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. (B) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history: (C) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or (D) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. XIV. DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY A. NRHP and CRHR Criterion A Fairly extensive research has indicated that the Delaney Ranch House and associated structures are not associated with any event important in the regional history of California or the United States. Consequently, the residence does not appear eligible for listing in either the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion A. Criterion B The ranch house complex was constructed by Arthur Delaney, a successful oil man from Long Beach. However, many individuals in the Lake Elsinore were of the opinion that Olympic swimmer and Hollywood actor Johnny Weissmuller had a direct connection to the ranch. Extensive background research and interviews with the descendents of previous owners have shown this to be patently false. Weismuller did not build the house let alone own the property. Insofar as anyone can recall, lie never rented or leased the house. That is not to say that he may have been invited for a visit but no one interviewed ever recalled Weissmuller stepping foot on the property. Consequently, research Inas failed to identify any person connected to the Delaney 32 Ranch House considered to be important to National or California history. Therefore, the residence does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion B. Criterion C Research has indicated that construction of the Delaney Ranch House did not begin until 1935. No architect has been identified with the undertaking. Although the style of the complex is Spanish Eclectic, the classic `U' shape of the Californio Rancho has been significantly adulterated to where it is almost unrecognizable. Today, the complex is fundamentally a series of box additions to the original core designed to increase useable living space with complete disregard to architectural continuity. When first recorded in 1982, the residence was thought to be of adobe construction (Meredith 1982). But in actuality, it is built of hollow tiles covered with thick plaster or stucco. The use of Toad bearing hollow tiles for the exterior and some interior walls does not appear to be unique in house construction for the period as the Alberhill LA Brick Co. manufactured a great deal of them for the local and national markets. Unfortunately, they suffer from the same seismic instability problems found in all unreinforced masonry construction. The loss of architectural integrity through haphazard additions and modifications coupled with a significantly deteriorated physical state, have resulted in reducing the house to little more than a curiosity. For these reasons, the Delaney Ranch House does not appear eligible for the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion C. Criterion D Criterion D is generally reserved for prehistoric and historic archaeological sites whose further study could yield additional important data. As the Delaney Ranch House is not archaeological in nature, it does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion D. XV. RECOMMENDATIONS As presently proposed, the Delaney Ranch House and associated structures are slated for demolition. However, since none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no adverse 33 impacts to historic resources. Therefore, no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout. 34 REFERENCES CITED ATKINS, RUTH 2013 Personal communications. President of the Lake Elsinore Historical Society. BYNON, A.A. & SON 1992 History and Directory of Riverside County 1893-4. Centennial reprint by the Historical Commission Press (1st printing 1894). Riverside. CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE (DEBRA BOWDEN) 2013a Delaney Petroleum Corporation. Business Entity Detail. 2013b The Serveo Foundation. Business Entity Detail. CORRAL, JEAN 2013 Personal communication. Lake Elsinore resident (since 1964), historian and author. ELSINORE LEADER PRESS Roll G (January 1928 — August 23, 1928, Roll H (August 30 -1928 -December 25, 1930, and Roll I (January 1, 1931 -August 1, 1932) on 'file with the Lake Elsinore Branch Library. GH1OTTO, GENE 2011 "Lake Elsinore: Citys pioneers were the first to Dream Extreme." Press Enterprise, Local News, August 15, 2011. GUNTHER, .LANE DAVIES 1984 Riverside County Place Nantes, their Origins & their Stories. Rubidoux Printing Company. Riverside. HORTON, ROY JAMES 2013 Personal communication. Grandson to A.J. Delaney and son to Patricia Joy Delaney Horton. HUDSON, TOM 1988 Lake Elsinore Valley: its story 1776-1977. City of Lake Elsinore Centennial (2nd printing). Lake Elsinore. INDEPENDENT PRESS -TELEGRAM 1960 "When the Brown Derby Was a Hat." News Section. May 1, 1960. Long Beach. JAMES, ELIZABETH C. 1973 Elsinore History Vignettes. Inland California Publishing Company. 35 KIBBEL, BILL 2004 Historic Buildings -Structural Terra Cotta. http:Hliistoricbldgs.com/terra_cotta.htm LA LAGUNA REVUE. Monthly news magazine. Mayhill Press. Lake Elsinore. LONG BEACH PRESS -TELEGRAM 2013 Obituary for Patricia Joy Delaney Horton. April 17, 2013. MOSIIR, DAN 2010 California Bricks. Los Angeles Pressed Brick Company, Alberhill. ']'HE HIGH COUNTRY. Quarterly history magazine. Published by Cox, Hicks, Hudson, and Love, Tom Hudson, editor. Temecula. VAN NOTE, CHARLES O. 1969 Patent US3476415. United States Patent Office. WEBB, H. REED 2013 Personal communication. Son of E.Ray Webb, Servco Ranch partner. WESTERLUND, JON 2013 Personal communication. Son of Paul Westerlund, Servco Ranch partner. WILLIAMS, MICHAEL J. 2009 "Lake Elsinore: Brothers say they heard Elsinore Weissmuller stories. San Diego Union Tribune. News section. August 9, 2009. 36 Plate I. Top: Northwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House from access road to the east. Bottom: Southeasterly view of Delaney Ranch 1 -louse from hilltop to the northwest. 37 Plate II. Top: Southwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House from Pool House above. Bottom: West facing view into courtyard showing damage. 38 Plate 1II. Top: 1981 photograph of courtyard looking southwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Southwesterly view into courtyard as it appears today. 39 Plate IV. Top: 1981 photograph of milk room looking northwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Northwesterly view of converted milk room into guest room. 40 Plate V. Top: Looking northeast through covered porch toward arched entry on courtyard. Bottom: Northwesterly view of original garage and carport. 41 Plate VI. Top: Northwesterly view of a cross-section of hollow tile from the demolished courtyard wall. Bottom: Close-up of intact ALBERHILL LOADBEARING LAB CO hollow block building tiles. 42 Plate VIT. Top: Stamp of the Alberhill LA Brick Co. impressed into the hollow block building tile. Bottom: Close-up of concrete `H' blocks used in the construction of Pool House. 43 Plate VIII. Top: Southwesterly view of Pool House and back-filled swhu ning pool. Bottom: Southeasterly view of deteriorated Pool ]-louse roof. 44 Plate IX. Top: Northeasterly view of back-filled pool from Pool blouse. Bottom: Easterly view of deteriorated diving board at the northeast end of Pool. 45 Plate X. Top: 1981 photograph depicting Lookout, Pool, and Pool House (Riverside Co. Historical Commission). Bottom: Close-up of Lookout over cistern looking northwest as it appears today. 46 APPENDIX A: PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS DAVID M. VAN HORN, PH.D. Education B.A. in Art History (1969) University of California at Santa Barbara (with honors). Studies included classical, medieval, renaissance, Spanish, and modern architecture. Independent study with Prof. David Gebhard, noted southern California architectural historian. Ph.D. in Classical University of Pennsylvania. Bronze Age to Hellenistic classical Archaeology (1976) architecture. Studied Athenian topography (urban growth and architectural development) with Prof. Rodney S. Young, noted classical architectural historian. Professional Historic/Architectural Affiliations Member, Register of Professional Historians (2006 -present) Architectural) istorical Experience As a professional cultural resource management consultant since 1977, Dr. Van Horn has researched, evaluated and reported on literally hundreds of architectural and historical properties. These have included buildings of all dates, from 19°i century adobe ruins to modern Los Angeles residences; and structures of all types, consisting of canals, bridges, resorts, schools, community facilities, commercial buildings and industrial plants. This research has been conducted for various types of projects including bridge construction, surface and subway transit facilities, and road improvement projects. The following selected projects are intended to illustrate Dr. Van Horn's experience with architectural history and historic archaeology. P.O. Box 180 Sul) City, CA 92586'1'al (909) 244-1783 Fax (909) 244-0084 ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORICAL EVALUATION EXPERIENCE HABS/HAER Projects * Replica House, Pomona College, Claremont, Los Angeles County (2012). Project included a Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) for the campus building known as Replica House (1938). The project entailed an extensive architectural assessment, hand -measured scale drawings, detailed history and archival photographs (large and medium format). Lead agency -Facilities Management, Pomona College. * West Adobe, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside (2010-2012). Project includes an Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) for the West Adobe (1926). The undertaking entails an extensive architectural assessment of the adobe, hand measured scale drawings, detailed family history and archival photographs (large and medium format). Lead agency -City of La Quinta. * Kraemer House, City of Placentia, County of Orange (2003-2004). Undertaking comprised an Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) for the Gilbert Kraemer House (1920). The project entailed an extensive architectural assessment of the estate house, hand -measured scale drawings, detailed family history and archival photographs (large and medium format). Lead agency -City of Placentia. * KEHE/KPI Radio Broadcast Studio Building, 141 N. Vermont Avenue, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County (2002). The project included a HABS/HAER study of the National Register eligible Radio Broadcast Studio Building (1936). The project entailed an extensive architectural assessment of the facility, hand -measured scale drawings, archival photographs, as well as a detailed history of Earle C. Anthony and radio station KPI. Lead agency- Los Angeles Unified School District. * Vega Building, East Los Angeles, Los Angeles County (1993). HABS/HAER recordation of a three-story commercial building listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Lead agency- Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Section 106 Caltrans Projects * Metrolink Parking Structure Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County (2009). This parking structure project lies within Viaduct Park adjacent to the historic Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Passenger and Freight Depot. Sectionl06 compliance included HPSR, HRER, and FOE reports prepared for Caltrans District 8. * Ranchero Road and BNSF Grade Separation Project, City of Hesperia, San Bernardino County (2007). This road improvement project included Section 106 compliance for all residential and commercial properties located along a 7700 -foot portion of roadway. HPSR and HAER 2 documents prepared for Caltrans District 8. * Ramona Avenue Grade Separation Project, Montclair, San Bernardino County (2000). Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on 1/2 -mile street widening program. City of Montclair and Caltrans District 8. * Imperial Highway-Orangethorpe/Esperanza Grade Separation Project, City of Yorba Linda, Orange County (1999-2000). Grade separation project for Imperial Highway over the BNSF tracks and Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road. Undertaking comprised architectural/historical analysis of all buildings and structures over 50 -years ofage and determinations of eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. An extensive field survey resulted in the discovery of a surviving portion of the 19°i century Scully Adobe, a component to the Don Bernardo Yorba Rancho complex. Consultation for the project was through Caltrans District's 12 & 7 as well as Caltrans Headquarters in Sacramento. City of Yorba Linda. * Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) Improvement Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County (1993). Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on a 1.5 mile street widening program. City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans District 8. * Turnbull Canyon Road Improvement, City of Industry, Los Angeles County (1992). Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on a 1.5 mile sheet widening program. Los Angeles County of Public WorkslCaltrans District 7, Section I06 Municipal Projects * TER] Project, San Marcos, County of San Diego (2003-2008). Project entailed an initial survey of the 20 -acre Merriam Ranch and subsequent determinations of eligibility for both the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. A total of six buildings and structures were assessed for this project including the 1889 Merriam Ranch House "La Mesita". * Cultural Resources Assessment for the Cerritos College 2003 Master Plan, Norwalk, Los Angeles County (2004). Tasks performed included a records search, history of the school and surrounding region, biographical sketch of the architectural firm, architectural evaluations of seven campus buildings for the National Register of Historic Places (NRI IP) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), completion of historic building records (DPR 523 series forms), and report. * Spring Mountain Ranch, Highgrove, Riverside County (2002). Project entailed a focused survey, history and subsequent determinations of eligibility for the Eureka and Vivienda Ranch complexes. A total of six buildings and structures (early 20"' century) were evaluated for both the NRHP and CRHR. Several of the buildings were constructed by Ethan Allen Chase, noted early 20°i century citrus rancher in Riverside County. 3 * Fay Jackson Residence, 1325 S. Van Ness Avenue, City of Los Angeles (2002). Los Angeles Unified School District and Chattel Architecture, Planning & Preservation, Inc. Conducted determinations of eligibility for the National Register and the California Register of Historical Resources for the residence of this important African-American journalist. * Casa Ramona School, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County (1999). Determinations of eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. Research on architecture of David Witmer, chief architect of the Pentagon and noted early 20'" century souther California school architect. City of San Bernardino. * Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) Metro Red Line Mid -City Project, Los Angeles (1996-1999). Historic and architectural evaluations of approximately 600 buildings and structures that lay above and adjacent to three alternative subway routes in the Mid - City section of Los Angeles. Of the 600 buildings and structures within the project area, approximately 450 required full historic and architectural evaluations in order to make determinations of eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. The project was conducted in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Caltrans District 7, the Federal Transit Authority, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the MTA. * Aquatics/Teen Center/Maintenance Facility/Parking Project, City of EI Monte, Los Angeles County (1999). Section 106 consultation intended to ascertain National Register Eligibility of several structures prior to demolition. City of El Monte Department of Parks, Recreation and Transportation and SHPO. * Riverside Cement Oro Grande Facility, Victorville, San Bernardino County (1998). Archaeological survey for prehistoric resources and determinations of eligibility for all historic structures within the 150 -acre facility. Evaluation of architecture of 20'h century industrial structures and 19°i century lime kilns. San Bernardino County Planning Department. * Master Campus Development Plan of Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, Los Angeles County (1993). Historic and architectural evaluations, and determinations of NRNP eligibility of approximately 30 campus buildings. City of Claremont. * Downtown Business District Specific Plan Area, City of La Puente, Los Angeles County (1992). Historical reconstruction, architectural evaluations, and determinations ofNRHP eligibility of six downtown city blocks. City of La Puente. • El Pueblo State Historic Park, Los Angeles County (1984). Compiled reconstructions of all structures on several blocks of the EI Pueblo District, the oldest part of Los Angeles. The reconstructions, which were based upon archival research at many southern California Institutions, were arranged in eras beginning with Los Angeles' pueblo days and ending with the modern city. California Department of Parks and Recreation. M Historic Archaeological Projects * Mission San Juan Capistrano Zanja, City of San Juan Capistrano, County of Orange (2002). Undertaking comprised initial identification, excavation, and documentation of the Mission San Juan Capistrano's Trabuco aqueduct (early 19°i century). This buried feature was exhaustively researched and documented by the excavation of certain sections of the aqueduct complete with detailed drawings, photographs and narrative report. * Buena Vista Coal Generating Plant and Coal Terminal (1990-1991). Directed a survey and Phase 11 excavation program. Uncovered and evaluated a segment of the old North River Navigation (canal). Research with Dr. W.E. Trout (Va. Canals & Navigations Society) and Mr. Mike Barber (prehistory). Report on file with the Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources; reviewed and accepted by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. * Chapin Adobe, City of Indian Wells, Riverside County (1989). Conducted both test and salvage archaeological investigations of the Chapin Adobe. This interesting structure, which belonged to one of Indian Well's first white immigrant families, existed only as "melted" foundations at the time the study commenced. Based upon the archaeological evidence and historical information and photographs acquired with the help of the Chapin family, Van Horn was able to reconstruct the entire building on paper. This study provided some surprising data on adobe building techniques employed by the early settlers of the Coachella Valley. City of Indian Wells. * Peralta Adobe, Anaheim Hills, Orange County (1983-84). This mid -19th century adobe was a rain at the outset of the investigation, the second floor having been burned out and many of the doors and windows altered or removed altogether. Van Horn studied the remaining architectural features intensively, often removing elements of late remodeling in order to expose evidence of the original construction. He also conducted archaeological excavations in and around the adobe which resulted in the recovery of many period artifacts. Today, the Ramon Peralta Adobe stands as a renovated structure which contains exhibits of photographs and artifacts acquired during my investigation. The entire project was conducted under the auspices of the Orange County Historical Commission and the Orange County Department of Parks and Recreation. Publications in Architecture and History Van Horn, David and John Elliott 2003 Investigations at the Ramon Peralta Adobe. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Occasional Paper Number 3. Contains a complete architectural reconstruction, history of, and historical archaeology of one of southern California's few surviving 19"' century adobe residences. Van Horn, David 2003 A Brief History of Penobscot Bay. Robert's Press. Castine, ME. Short history of some of the earliest European settlements in the Penobscot Bay region from Rockland to Bar Harbor. E Van Horn, David M. 1993 A BriefEariy History of Castine: Prehistory to 1815. Robert's Press. Castine, MC. This brief account is intended to give the reader a convenient synopsis of Castine's early history. Few places can boast a history as lengthy, complex, and colorful as the small town of Castine, Maine. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES LAURA S. WHITE Curriculum Vilae Address: P.O. 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Phone: (951) 244-1783 EDUCATION 1989 M.A. in Anthropology with emphasis in Archaeology, San Diego State University, San Diego. 1981 B.A. in Anthropology, University of San Diego, San Diego. 1978-1979 University of San Diego Business School. 1977-1978 Pepperdine University Business School. CREDENTIALS 1999 -Present Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) Certification: Archaeologist I.D. # 10452 1990-1998 Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) Certification: Field Research GENERAL Laura S. White, M.A. is a RPA (Register of Professional Archaeologists)/SOPA (Society of Professional Archaeologists) certified archaeologist and has held the full-time position of Field Director with Archaeological Associates since 1990. During the past twenty-seven years of her professional career, she has contributed to or directed all phases of archaeological investigation for hundreds of projects. Recently, she has completed a number of private and governmental assessments requiring a Section 106 consultation and/or National Register eligibility. Ms. White has extensive experience with cultural resource compliance with regard to CEQA, NEPA, NABS, HAER and various other local criteria. Aside from her RPA/SOPA rating, Ms. White is also certified by the Counties of Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Ventura to direct all phases of archaeological investigation. P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel (951) 244-1783 Fax (951) 244-0084 Her archaeological expertise has taken her to project sites located throughout southern and central California. These undertakings have comprised both prehistoric and historic archaeological investigations situated in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern, Fresno, Madera, Inyo, San Diego, and Imperial Counties. In conjunction with her career as a professional archaeologist, Ms. White was Co -Editor of the prestigious Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly journal frotn 1990-1991. She has also been a guest lecturer at the request of the Bureau of Land Management and Long Beach State University. Furthermore, she has designed archaeological exhibits for the San Diego Museum of Man and the City of Vista, San Diego County. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS American Committee for the Preservation of Archaeological Collections (ACPAC) OVERSEAS EXPERIENCE 1981 Participant in on-going excavations at Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. PRODUCTIONACTIVITIES 1991-1990 Co-editor for the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly. The PCAS Quarterly is one of two professional archaeological journals dedicated to the archaeology of southern California. EXHIBITS 1987 Participant in construction of exhibit for the City of Vista, California. Artifacts on display are all from archaeological sites in the Vista area. 1981 Participant in construction of exhibit on the Early Cultures of San Diego, San Diego Museum of Man. University of San Diego, San Diego. GRANTS 1981 Recipient of an Academic Research Grant for archaeology, University of San Diego, San Diego, California. LECTURES AND PRESENTATIONS 1991 Guest lectured for the Mojave River Archaeological Society in Barstow. Topic: The Atlatl in California. 1987 Guest lectured at Long Beach State University. Topic: Contract Archaeology. 1985 The Plight of Del Mar Man. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of Society for California Archaeology, San Diego. PUBLICATIONS Van Horn, David, Laura S. White, and Robert S. White 2005 The Prehistory of Gretna Green, A Site in Northern San Diego County, pp. 145-168. IN: Onward and Ulnvard! Payers in Honor of Clement W. Meighan (Keith L. Johnson, editor). Stansbury Publishing. Chico. ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE AND UNPUBLISHED ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORTS A representative list of field experience and unpublished archaeological reports is available upon request. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel (951) 244-1783 Fax (951) 244-0084 ROBERT S. WHITE Curriculum Vitae Address: P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Phone: (951)244-1783 EDUCATION 1987 B.A. in Liberal Studies with emphasis in Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach. 1977 A.A. Degree in Liberal Arts, Los Angeles Harbor College. GENERAL Robert S. White has over twenty-eight years of full-time archaeological experience and has been affiliated with a number of southern California contract archaeology firms beginning in 1983. Since 1992 he has fulfilled the position of Director and more often than not, Principal Investigator for Archaeological Associates. Mr. White has extensive experience in all aspects of cultural resource investigation and management. These skills include but are not necessarily limited to: field survey and excavation, construction and demolition monitoring, obsidian hydration studies, lab analysis, land surveying, cartography, archival research, budgeting, planning, and document writing/production. Robert is certified by the Orange, Riverside, and Ventura County Planning Departments to conduct all phases of archaeological investigation. Since 1983, Mr. White has conducted well over 350 prehistoric and historic archaeological investigations in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Kern, San Diego, Imperial, and Inyo Counties. Additionally, in concert with colleague Dr. David Van Horn, they have pioneered innovative techniques that have revolutionized data recovery programs on large, low-density archaeological sites. Mr. White is also an experienced heavy equipment operator specializing in loader/backhoe operations utilizing skid -steer loaders (Bobcats) and full-sized backhoes. ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE A representative list of archaeological field experience is available upon request. PUBLICATIONS 2005 The Prehistory of Gretna Green, A Site in Northern San Diego County (with David Van Horn and Laura S. White), pp. 145-168. IN: Onward and Upivard! Papers in Honor of Clement W. Meighan (Keith L. Johnson, editor). Stansbury Publishing. Chico. 1991 Prehistoric Fire -Making Techniques of California and Western Nevada. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 27-38. 1986 Some Techniques for Mechanical Excavation in Salvage Archaeology (with D.M. Van Horn and J.R. Murray)..lournal of Field Archaeology 13:239-244. UNPUBLISUED REPORTS A representative list of unpublished archaeological reportshnanuscripts is available upon request. 2 APPIENDIX B Original Historic Resources Inventory Form 523 W. Minthorne Street, Lake Elsinore — — — — — -- — — - 22. ,Doi, --- - ---- ------- ci APPENDIX C Lake Elsinore Historical Society Correspondence April 23, 2013 Ms. Ruth Atkins, President Lake Elsinore Historical Society P.O. Box 84 Lake Elsinore, CA 92531-0084 RE: Historic Residence located at 523 W. Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore Dear Ms. Atkins: Archaeological Associates has been retained to conduct a Historic Building Assessment of the residence and associated structures located at 323 W. Minthom Street. It is our understanding that the residence was constructed circa 1930 and has been vacant for several years. We are seeking input from the historical society with regard to specific information on the history of the property. If the society is aware of any literature, photos, or local residents that may have special knowledge of the residence, we would very much like to hear from you. You can contact me directly at 951 244-1783 if you would like. Thanks ! Very tmly yours, Laura S. White Field Director LS W: frle;spyglassinquiry by IISk1aa P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel: (951) 244-1783 (Fax: (951) 244-0084 email: aaLinlandmet Lake Elsinore Historical Society Mailing Address: P.O. Box 84, Lake Elsinore, CA 92531-0084 Telephone: 951/579-4852 ee 11 11 May 6, 2013 Ms. ]aura S. White Archaeological Associates P O Box 180 Sun City CA 92586 Dear Laura: Re: Historic Residence located at 523 West Minthom Street, lake Elsinore In response to your letter about the subject property, we have absolutely nothing on this site. We do, however, have lots of people who swear they know this property belonged to Johnny Weissmuller or refer to it as Tarzan's Ilouse. One of our historians used to work downtown and saw him driving his car up and down Main Street. Another person tells the story that his father had an agency for movie stars and was an agent for Weissmuller. Everything we know about it is heresy and cannot be verified. The people who could verity the stories are now deceased. There is one lady in town who remembers going there as a little girl but she has no pictures just memories. One of our members used to be a real estate broker in town and she did a title search but his name did not show as an owner of the property. Over the years, we have decided a friend owned the property. With the large swimming pool, Weissmuller may have visited frequently. During the time, he supposedly visited here was after his years of participating in the Olympic Games and at the beginning of bis movie career. A son-in-law of his claims Weissmuller was never in Elsinore (as the town was called then) but he did not become a member of the family until around the 1960s. If you find anything that can verify his presence in Elsinore, we would appreciate your sharing it with us. Sincerely, Ruth Atkins President 951.678.1537 P. S. l have forwarded an e-mail to you about the digitized newspaper, the Riverside Daily Press. § 0 f 0 0 � 0 k 0 r / --10 m § r-( \ 9 « U) ƒt 0 \ / } 0 < o § 2> KE § m «ea:(D o >rr;Ergo q §k r ~—_§\ 0® « 9§ ®2 7 �( (70 3t|o= _ &E}})\\0 o j §mm o cn2 ® § 2; \\J}5 / § CD\\\&°2/ ¥ >CD >( >r (g(\\�2/ k 2®G!)\I \[/3 m2 \2n0 }\ ,/w\ J� } ,} {\/}/ ( _ 7� 0 _ \� co ( � 7( /\ _ \§ \ 3 7( /\ e /) § 0 f 0 0 � 0 k 0 r / --10 m § \ 90 0 \ / } 0 < o 2> ) § m ca m o q §k r 0 0® « 9§ ®2 M }\ G j §mm o cn2 § / § ¥ § 0 f 0 0 � 0 k 0 r «> =sr =2 7 -0ag0 -0 000-9.0 \ƒC )� a >_ /22 ):o :0 >y} ee®� _a2;<: :< / <ys=®= 2%[&mJ;f&@k ® I c e\Ra®!`^*° , �2 ®�~(P© {}7/\* —W oe z >&}a, —u m �`°� �E92e&Gre E7e26! ® § m ) l;-Gm§:J&� ~®2 /{ z{z }\}!%�{\� v §®\[!E;§,E - \\C) /!§a70 o m .sz:»®0©2] §} Zz§±2: < »9fc- —0) \\ f}r/a\ (\}\\[\\\ �\ \CD0 w §Em z %°(\\� _ / (D (D {[/( \\m ;� -,§ >� )��\0— \(\&a7 » m m a .. - _ ? : \M ccocn] �CD / --- �$ z &m 69 \ CA> (w /( /\ \ }§ \= OD /\ M () m m o m -nC7n m_n In u W m W T. cuUTNn c c C m oa O m m ,Zl �_ ' �. 0, d C m °°���CD m �-om F o(DQa� N v CD Q I I m N m 0 O m n> N C _Q -u N (ZD O Q N Z o. 3 _ -D Cn Cl) 0 0 m N o o n o m 3 N 0 D w Q< N N ' 3 m m o n r o N--------- ------- p On INTI N< n O= m N z Y) cn w N z O — o U) N O (D (aa - - oCaDT O S 0 N J W N C a O O) A O' O CJIi N A N W A CO J (D � a1 - -- a vS O N �P (r N EA C w C j C UWi D Z C 3 a N rn r a N C D) N Vt 0) -� W W (r O W A (b N N O W (o W N 7' A N N co W N J W 00 O O Ul Z C v3 lfl ({) O D) y < A < < W — N n EA N D S Vt !i) EA o) C O C W C J D N :-4m N o w m O N W 3 0 W W A > N N cWT c . W 1 N co O O Z C 3 CD N N < O O W V K CO CO N c0 N (o N A A N N c0 W N J W (b O U) W (P O C O N —0 EA N W S Vl Efl EA (Y) C d) 0 �Wiv o vo) 3 W N W N D X n S \ j m 70 { m \.\ / 90 \ %» §§ a te z< 2 c o §] / m m 2 m / j/ o © i \ / m 2 _\ < 2 § / / \ e = _ Cl) = < » / z a / / w = / 3 m g § o i E > \ / e o > 0 m co Cl) \ - 2 6 e= ° N \ \ g -N \ 8 @ w G 2 2 c » = o @ 2 m // > @ z z a / z a e z= \ \ m \ U) 10 w 5 w = > z / M > \ m m / / / m o m c o I\ _ = 3 m e 2 < cl / / A / > 2 0 f / \ m / f § m § / / / m / > / j / / / < < < § / / / \ $ / \ / m / ® j ® § 6 2 $ m / ƒ ƒ / R j= \ m j j \ z /mm � § / { \\\\/ \> m m \ m w c m % o= _ / / / Cl) \_ § § _j ® \ � / ® $ \ \/ \ Cl) / / > / z \ / z § / k / En z a m \ B m � > } § � n2 0§ Qm2■ rn %- 2 ® \m �0m /0 0 0z Iw / > a ) k C1 rY or ..ter. L A I`G 1: S l Y O IZE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: April 28, 2015 SUBJECT: MONTHLY PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY APRIL 2015 Public Works Street Maintenance March April Pot Hole Repairs 332 227 Graffiti Removal 141 141 Storm Drains Cleaned 17 17 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 79 55 Signs Installed 19 4 Sign Repairs 32 49 Sidewalk Repairs (Square Ft) 260 750 Curb & Gutter Repairs (Linear Ft) 0 30 Removed Illegal Signs 335 127 Area Sprayed With Herbicide (in acres) 16 5 Shopping Carts Pick -Ups 71 60 Trimmed Trees Various Locations 7 30 Drain Inspections 17 25 Removal of Road Hazards 30 25 Heatwurx Repair Units 0 2668 Vehicle Maintenance Vehicle Repairs 12 15 Vehicle Service 7 5 Alignments 0 0 Tire Installation & Repairs 17 22 Small Equipment Repairs 8 6 Service Calls 9 10 Mufflers & Tailpipes 0 0 Body Shop Repairs 0 0 Trailers Repaired 12 9 Batteries & Jump Starts 7 6 Boat Repairs 0 10 Heavy Equipment Repairs 17 9 Vehicle Maintenance Program (Fleet 2000) 8 0 Weed Abatement Lots Cleaned 0 0 City Lots Cleaned 6 12 Trees Trimmed 16 55 Illegal Dumping Clean-ups 10 5 Replaced irrigation clocks 0 0 Shopping Carts Picked Up 15 6 Checked all Landscaped areas for Major Issues 0 1 Day Removed Illegal Signs 4 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC COUNTER Research Requests 7 5 Plan Checks 5 1 Final Maps 0 0 Grading 5 0 Street Improvement 2 0 Development Review 6 4 Flood Plain Determination 0 2 Bond Release Requests 0 4 Oversize Transportation Permits 4 7 Encroachments Permit Applications 9 10 Encroachment Permit Traffic Issues 0 3 CIP UPDATE Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status Senior Center Sidewalk Senior 100% plans In progress Contractor submittals Improvements Center completed approved. Materials on Project No. 4424 order. Project in construction Start Date 4/21/15. McVicker Dog Park McVicker 100% 100% completed Project completed Fence Improvements Park Complete Project is under close - Project No. Z40000 out phase Notice of Completion filed on 3/10/2015. Lakepoint Park Electrical Lakepoint 100% In progress West Coast lighting & Panel Park Complete Energy (Contractor) Project No.4414 submittals completed. New electrical panel & switch ordered. Expected by 5/14/2015. Partial construction began 4/2/2015 on cahinet No 1 Serenity Park- Skate Serenity Park 30% Scheduled for April In progress - received Zone completion 2015 RFP for design. Project Project No. 4419 in construction. Start date 4/13/2015. Facilities Master Plan Citywide Project underway. Data Project No. Z30000 collection completed. Preparation of draft report under progress. Anticipated completion by June/July 2015. Parks Facilities Master Citywide Anticipated completion Plan by July 2015. GHD is Project No. 4106 preparing final report for Parks Master Plan. In progress 58% complete. CIP UPDATE Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status City Master Drainage Citywide In progress Received draft of Plan Update proposed District Project No. 120 alignments; draft routed to local stakeholders. User Fee Study Citywide In progress Fee study underway by Project No. Z30002 Willdan Engineering. Cost allocation study completed. Anticipated completion March/April 2015. Gunnerson Street Gunnerson 95% design Staff to submit RFA Rehabilitation between completed package to Caltrans for Project No. 4350 Lakeshore construction by Drive and 7/1/2015. 100% Plan & SR -74 Received on 4/20/15. NEPA environmental doc submitted to Caltrans on 4/9/2015. RNV certification to Caltrans by 4/27/15. Collier Island Outlet Mall 80% Construction Developer Agreement Modification Phase I completed anticipated for approved. Plans are Project No. 4388 April/May 2015 being finalized by staff and Developer to bid the project. City Attorney to open escrow account. City Monument Signs Lake Elsinore 100% In progress Project under Project No. 4396 design construction. Anticipated completed completion by June 23, 2015 CIP UPDATE Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status Third Street Drainage — Lake Elsinore In progress Coordination with area Phase 1 development continues; Project No. 4296 work on preliminary design plan has begun. Traffic Signal Installation Sage at 100% 100% Project completed. Canyon Hills/Sage Road Canyon Hills Project No. 4368 Notice of Completion filed with City Council on 3/10/15. Traffic Signal Installation Riverside 859/b City Coordinating with Grand Avenue at Drive (HWY County on development Riverside 74) @ Grand projects and obtaining Project No. 4392 Ave and signal plans from Riverside Dr. developer. (HWY 74) @ Lakeside H. S. Slurry Seal Project Various 100% 100% Project completed. Project No. Z10014 streets citywide Pavement Management Citywide In progress Project will out to bid by Program (Grind & 4/20/15. Overlay / R&R Phase 2) Project No. Z10008 Annual Pavement Citywide In progress Citywide sidewalk Management Plan — survey project kick-off Project No. Z10005 meeting conducted by Bucknam & Associates on March 17, 2015. Anticipated completion in June/July 2015. 34% of the field survey is completed so far. CIP UPDATE Project Project Location Design Construction Project Status 1-15/Railroad Canyon 1-15 @ In progress PA&ED in progress. City Road Interchange Railroad Council Roundabout Improvements (PAED) Canyon Project progress update Project No. Z10016 Interchange conducted in March 2015. Anticipated PA&ED completion in December 2015. Railroad Canyon/1-15 1-15 @ 100% Plans approved by Finalize bidding Southbound Off Ramp Railroad CALTRANS. City documents and bid out Deceleration Lane Canyon proceeding with on 4/22/2015. Project No. 4432 Interchange construction bidding Main Street Interchange Being added to the Project No. Z10017 TUMF Network, being placed on the upcoming CIP to perform PSR, Needs to be improved by 2024. City to perform feasibility analysis of Main St. new interchange and Camino Del Norte. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Grant Yates, City Manager FROM: Johnathan O. Skinner, Community Services Director DATE: April 20, 2015 SUBJECT: Community Services Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Vicky Saavedra, Community Services Office Specialist. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The following provides a summary of the Community Services Department's programs, activities and events for March 2015. VOLUNTEERS We are currently recruiting clerical volunteers for the following departments; Public Works, Engineering, City Clerk's Office, Human Resources and Community Services. The Community Services Department utilized a total of 15 volunteers for the Unity in the Community 5k Run, which will was held on Saturday, April 18, 2015. We are also recruiting 12 volunteers to help with the 2015 Pet Walk, which will be held on Saturday, May 9, 2015. The current total of volunteer applications submitted this year is 20, which include 4 adults and 16 youths. COMMUNITY CENTER The Community Center launched REC1, a new reservation and registration software program that will replace ActiveNet, the software that our department was utilizing. REC1 is a user-friendly and affordable software that will improve our customer service and community presence. Many residents have taken advantage of the new program and completed the activity registrations and facility reservations on the website. We plan to expand this program at multiple locations and for many different community events. Studio 395 hosted their monthly "Live Art & Music" event on Saturday, March 21. They enjoyed live music by local bands and vendors that sold arts and crafts by local artist. SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER Free income tax preparation and filling services continued this month and will continue through mid-April for all seniors. Walk-in service was available on Wednesdays and Fridays from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Ron Toth, from Rancho Physical Therapy conducted an excellent new hands-on workshop on Fall Prevention. He led the group in exercises to strengthen the legs and assist with balance and discussed simple fall prevention measures that they can take to lessen the risk of falling. The seniors had their annual St. Patrick's Day luncheon on Tuesday, March 17 with a full crowd of 57 participants. The Lake Elsinore Genealogy Society met with the seniors to provide informative and educational information regarding searching for your family roots. The Department of Public Health conducted an Asthma & COPD workshop on how to develop an action plan to manage their conditions. On Wednesday, March 25, the C.A.R.E. program held their annual Fraud Awareness workshop. They welcome special guest speaker, Deputy District Attorney Frank Donzanti to speak on Elder Abuse, Scams, Annuities and Insurance Fraud. Other monthly services included; bread distribution, notary services, and Successful Aging and Peace of Mind workshops. SPECIAL EVENTS The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation held a "Walk for the Cure" event, which was held on Saturday, March 7. The event had 1,500 participants that came together at the Diamond Stadium to support their family and friends who have Type 1 Diabetes. Lucas Oil Regional Off -Road Truck Races held their first of three regional races at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park on March 7 and 8. This event brought in 5,000 people in attendance over the weekend. On March 20 and 21, Lucas Oil National Off -Road Truck Races held their first of three national races at the Lake Elsinore Motorsports Park. These races brought over 20,000 people in attendance. On March 28 and 29, the National Water Ski Racing Association returned to Lake Elsinore after a 3 year hiatus. This event featured high speed marathon races around the lake. Participants were able to set up and launch from La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch. Spectators were able to see first-hand how these participants prepared for this high speed race. Rosetta Canyon HOA held their annual Egg Hunt at Rosetta Canyon Park on Saturday, March 29. They had many fun activities such as crafts, face painting and a magician for the community to enjoy. This event was open to the public and brought close to 500 people in attendance. The City of Lake Elsinore welcomed an Amphibious Bridge Exercise Project that was held on March 23 through the 27, 2015. The United States Marine Corp. performed the installation of a temporary bridge project that spanned over a small gap on the east side of the channel as well as the width of the channel on Lake Elsinore. Over 90 Marines stationed their equipment (totaling over 30 heavy duty trucks) to supply portable bridge equipment, amphibious boats to maneuver floating bridge components and large trucks that transported personnel and equipment to the site. City officials and the general public were invited to walk over both bridges during media day. As quickly as they created the bridge, the Marines had the bridge deconstructed by the next day and were on the road one day early. The City appreciates USMC for selecting Lake Elsinore for this exercise and look forward to future opportunities to assist in training our troops. SKATE PARK The total attendance at the McVicker Skate Park for the month of March was 640. We had 6 skate park rentals and 41 new waivers forms filled out. Skate 156 Scooter 326 BMX 158 °1 � r a co r N O O a Co Q S O Otl CO O momn O -n O CD N ® -0-0 \ $ - I / / f I / / 7 / CD 03- \ \ CD k \ \ \ ) k \ T / y w K « { / © ~ { / 7= a `> \\\ \- \\ ��( \ \_- 0�=7 ( m\( { 0 �% \ 9 &§ \ -_ _ _ (}/ CO /J/ \ ^ CT & - _ «� 6 / (D o « _3 \-- 3 - -0 \_ \\_ � ( \ 3 - /S %\ (D . ) C0(DD )\ \0 } ¥\ En_ 2 _ _ 2 / { J - Z « : \$` _ °\co 0 _ CD \ \ CD \\ \� 0CD \ 0 CD ® , 2=® \ }\ \zr `- i\ _ CD / \s s \ \\ \ \ \� \ \� \ } E] ® _CD \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w ) \ - 0 *^ \\ � \ (D \ y CD ::r cn = , CL FIT / / k = » J = \ ®CD a \M CT \ 0 0 = , : $ 2 / e I � O T O mgo ua m d T T O N R. C e r 0 j ! o $A39 V o m n I o n D J w o � N Ij r' o O V1 it N O — to o � N I ;N i O I J a Ooil �1441 t1' t~!1 Vii: T I I I � O T O mgo ua m d T T O N R. C e r o j ! V o m n i o fIf i D J N Ij r' it N O — A• i p � N ;N i O �1441 t1' t~!1 Vii: T • I• � N O N X' N c; I � J • A p T Y T O O m T O rb T O mgo ua m d T T O N R. C R. j C 44, ;N �1441 t1' t~!1 Vii: tMll. X' c; • r � • W. W �W W � rD D 1 • rD 71 • IF{ N 3 5- .., 7 CAe Y\L Am 7rrll j Q I' S (D a 3 C S (D .h N C J D ry C CL m n O C rt M M -e rt m r rt 1 In m } ) o ! M0/ \ { & e m _ 2 _® 0 ® / {) ! E ƒ \ \ } + \ E � « ^ { 2 \ / % ± §- ( \ _ \ $ / { / ® ^ § cn = f �C \ \ k < © eee e ( > )ET ( s \ \ 3 °/\ _ \ $ \ \ ) \ \ § \ > _ CL _ ( § \ > ± ( § § / \ _ { G) 2 / 3 > [ e ° \ k \ ) > _ % 0 - o \ > \Ln : ® § � \ }0 } ) p :E —I co -0 E: -n G r x v v N m m a 0 a(D C m =a om o 0 0 Z w m N 3 O O ((D D N N N A rn o_ Z D T ��m Ntn 0) L .ill mn N cP m N 3 m n ;u 3 m m C/) (O D n m CA A m m m N e -t N N p y Q Q O � of L 0 0 ,O o 0 a -T! O a 01 � CD w O N rr n rt 3 El E 0 N _F G� CL fD n O r rt W< m v M 10 fu I lD r rt 1 In H X m -{A'o009 T� r O a re r+ D) N 6 S II N N (D CID Wo -n m a A O O m ID- m m N 3 O m ¢ N 3 m w o m — w OD 3 N W N (D N to N n O = Z 0 O rt GI n O x O v m J Cl) - (n C w t o m y O 11 N 3 A C n J rr o m N Nw c n o D o w N `D y v � O D T 9 n � C v J ww o w3� N T 7 3 `D m n = m T A ' m �I J w C. n (D = CD O N oo ao VV) D O J T O n 6 m O o � N 3 W o O i � N N v O W (D � J � W i S N rt (D G o � N N O N N O S N N 3 Cl) N �p o O1 (O � v o fD 3 cin = W O { W 0— y W - (D O N O n O < V J W A N fD c N a N m Q n = (D _rt Cl) O O O O 3 T G Dl O � C N � O_ - O) -{A'o009 T� re r+ D) N 6 S II N N (D CID -n 0 c A O m ID- m Vi N 3 H 3 o m 3 A O N (D N = Nrr 0 O rt GI J fD t Ln y O 11 N 3 A C n J rr o m Nw c o N `D v � n � C J 3 `D m � m A ' m G_ CD O N oo ao O J e? (D n m O o � N 3 o � N (D � J S N (D G o � m v N N N �p (O � fD W O { W 0— (D O N O n O f0 fD N N Q (D O O O J O J rt O w ut 0 3 44 V V p -i Tlm O _O if -n d N N Q —= —= O N —m m .CD C) -n (J) �'n� D O_ ( N 55N N Eii< n 3 O (p D N N N 7s M Z z ...i -+ W --4ml N .P W > w ill V n T .Z7 m� N 1 G) o w-4 N A WV W y 7 C ^n. W C CL 0 O 91 m 0 -4 O J y, O o 3 -4 -� O 4 W A r w N C d N N a w w 3 N �. O L N 1 i 1 N j V � A r � � � d m m N O_ m v 0 3 m �ƒ;oogmo M R; E - 0-n01 ${ 1 \ n2ƒ§EE£I & j %°F®® B m -_ (« } \ / _ _ CL {\� \ \ J � G 4 \ co & m 0 ( \\ { / ( _ = i( j ,: 17 o _ _§! ; ¢ Lo \/ 7 \ ( _} ° {m cr - a \ ( (!§ ( � ( }) C, C, { 0o _ \ / : _ ( 0 M } \/; . $ \ _ _ ={2 - - :0 { ) : m _ - Iz ( / = r _ < \- ( } \ # - , m E E / i a 2 \} �ƒ;oogmo 0-n01 ${ 1 n2ƒ§EE£I & %°F®® B } / _ _ CL J \ & m 0 ( \\ + o fu Lo \/ _} ° {m ( (!§ }) E 0o ( m M \/; . ~ m Iz \ # a 2 \} 0 G « / � § 2 o §g=z° �)©}(D (D ƒ 0 (D CD / ^ [)«;; / } § � \ \ 0`(�� <§ - Z ° ) \ § - ° q - m (\ °)< o [)«;; 0`(�� / - { « ;; mo=o=o ( \ ! m & - _ _ �; ® / =e= gk } ___ o §w < _ \ ! o / §o> s = a/) e»e = . ; 0 - , a lD m .3 O U) n _+ K w O v H 0 , --i2(mogz Mo )l"\/($ \-z ( O'<=;. °«M & _ ] \ \ - \ } _ . m m & _\( ) z } ( � & , � \\ \\ �2&!�; � \ \ \ / [ �\a + \{� _ ( }_ { \/ ^ ` \ ( [ > /) E 0 0o } /)in § § z §/§ i °\\ 7 \ } ,e \ _ { [ U) 7 j 2 \§ 0$7 7 ± ) \ T , \ r ) # @ �a e e r+} / ) } ` 0) m ��� \ ) % § ± \ § / _ coC) 9 { \ > [ a \ � \ _ } \ , \ \ \0 --i2(mogz )l"\/($ ( O'<=;. °«M & _ ] - \ } _ . m & ) � & , � \\ � \ \ �\a + \{� }_ \/ ^ {m ( (!§ /) E 0o /)in § § z §/§ °\\ [ e 2 \§ # @ L'i / v N o—wx-u0 m (D (D -(D m a n� N D O (D O N N n 3 N_ n O (D D m N N A m N O W A N v o 0 1 o 0 P. o � 7s M < N Z 1 T �1 m� (n 1 G) p A V pt 7 _ a A m N O W A N v o 0 1 o 0 P. o � A a Virginia Bloom From: Grant Yates Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:25 PM To: City Council Cc: Barbara Liebold; Virginia Bloom Subject: Fwd: ID# 14-553 Cinco De Mayo Event Approval for Municipal Code Waiver Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged At the request of the applicant we will be removing item number 10 from the Consent Calendar tonight as the applicant decided to not serve alcohol at their event. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Johnathan 0. Skinner, MPA, CPRP" <Iskinner_Lake-Elsinore_org> Date: April 28, 2015 at 4:21:08 PM PDT To: Grant Yates <gya_tes@Lake_Elsinore.or�>, Virginia Bloom <vbloom@Lake-Elsinore.org> Subject: ID# 14-553 Cinco De Mayo Event Approval for Municipal Code Waiver Grant, At the request from the applicant this afternoon, ID#.14-553 recommendation for City Council Waive lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 9.28.030 Furnishing Alcohol Beverages in Public be withdrawn from the Council meeting this evening. They will not be having a Beer and Wine Garden. Thank you, Johnathan O. Skinner, MPA, CPRP Director of Community Services City of Lake Elsinore PH:(951) 674-3124 x266 CITY OF . i � LADE ?LS1110KE DREAM EXTREME �ry REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: G� .-)n4 Please Print Organization Represented: Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. �_. ( W eC�l J 3 Comments limited to 3 minutes) to. I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments -- Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF f 411-3 LAKE C'�,,pLS1110KE DR.rArtit EXTRLM iN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: V Address 2 q - ILI Phone o -I wish to address Agenda Item No.. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF LL ,. Name: LSMOKE DREAM EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) W/1-1 Please Print Organization Represented: Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. — (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) c�) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated!