Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSA Agenda Packet 08-27-2013SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ROBERT MAGEE, CHAIR WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG NATASHA JOHNSON, VICE -CHAIR (951) 674-3124 PHONE BRIAN TISDALE, AGENCY MEMBER ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER DISTRICT (EVMWD) BOARDROOM STEVE MANOS, AGENCY MEMBER 31315 CHANEY STREET GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 .................................................................................. TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2013 CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 p.m. PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 p.m. City Hall 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore EVMWD Boardroom 31315 Chaney St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the god and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. Due to the seismic retrofit of the Cultural Center, the City Council has moved its regular meeting location to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore. All parking for these meetings is free and is located along Treleven Avenue or at the gravel parking lot on the northwest corner of Treleven and Gedge Avenue. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at the City Clerk's Office on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.lake-elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the Agency. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 262, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Successor Agency Agenda Meeting of August 27, 2013 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION (SA1) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPEF (Gov't Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN #373-210-030, 371-100-014, 371-100-015, 371-100-004 Agency negotiator: Executive Director Yates and Agency Counsel Leibold Negotiating parties: Successor Agency and Civic Partners Elsinore LLC Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment Page 2 of 3 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. — EVMWD Boardroom, 31315 Chaney St., Lake Elsinore ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Successor Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and turn it into the Agency Clerk. The Chair will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless an Agency Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) (SA2) Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve the Minutes of the Regular Successor Agency Meeting of August 13, 2013. (SA3) Warrant List dated August 15 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated August 15, 2013. (SA4) Investment Report for the Month of July 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file report. Successor Agency Agenda Meeting of August 27, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING(S) None APPEAL(S) None BUSINESS ITEM(S) None Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS — NOWAGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Successor Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and turn it in to the Agency Clerk. The Chair will call on you to speak.) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, September 10, 2013. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at City Hall and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Wrg%atiia T. 13Coom Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk CITY OF LADE LSINOKE Diumv, EXTRI. Ty CITY CLERK'S DEPT. 2013 PERPETUAL CALENDAR (Subject to change) Aug 22 Mayor's State of Our City Address at the Diamond Club Aug 23-25 Lucas Oil AMA Races Aug 24 Canyon Lake Wakeboard Club Aug 27 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (EVMWD Boardroom) 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting (Conf. Room A) 5:00 p.m. Closed Session (Conf. Room A) - City Manager Evaluation? 7:00 p.m. Presentations Investment Reports (Consent) Award of Bid for Elm Street (Consent) Notice of Completion for Rosetta Canyon Fire Station (Consent) 2014-21 Housing Element and General Plan Amend No. 2013-02 (PH) Memorial Tree Dedication (Business) 2nd Reading and adoption of Ordinance 1316 (Business) City Departmental Monthly Reports Sep 2 LABOR DAY - City Hall Closed Sep 3 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION - Cancelled Sep 7 Free Fishing Day Household Hazardous & E -Waste Collection Off Road Racing Event Sep 8 Sideways Sundays Sep 10 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (EVMWD Boardroom) 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting (Conf. Room A) 5:00 p.m. Closed Session (Conf. Room A) 7:00 p.m. Presentations - LEMSAR Recognition; Posse Introduction Agreement w/RivCo for sidewalk maintenance along Machado (Consent) Aeration System Agreement (Consent) Approval of Tax Defaulted Property Sale (Business) Historical Preservation Ad Hoc Committee Report (Business) PSAC Ordinance Amendment (Business) Cancellation of Nov + Dec meeting dates (Business) Last Updated: August 22, 2013 Nov 2 Household Hazardous & E -Waste Collection Nov 5 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. Nov 11 VETERANS' DAY — City Hall Closed Nov 12 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (EVMWD Boardroom) 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting (Conf. Room A) 5:00 p.m. Closed Session (Conf. Room A) 7:00 p.m. Presentations Nov 13 Wednesday 5:00 p.m. CITIZEN CORP COUNCIL (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION (Senior Center) Nov 19 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. Nov 26 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (EVMWD Boardroom — Possibly Cancelled) 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting (Conf. Room A) 5:00 p.m. Closed Session (Conf. Room A) 7:00 p.m. Presentations City Departmental Monthly Reports Nov 28 THANKSGIVING DAY — City Hall Closed Nov 29 THANKSGIVING DAY AFTER — City Hall Closed Dec 3 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. Dec 10 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (EVMWD Boardroom) 3:45 p.m, Oversight Board Meeting (Conf. Room A) 5:00 p.m. Closed Session (Conf. Room A) 7:00 p.m, Presentations City Council Reorganization (Business) Dec 11 Wednesday 5:00 p.m. CITIZEN CORP COUNCIL (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION (Senior Center) Dec 17 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION (Senior Center) 6:00 p.m. Last Updated: August 22, 2013 3 Feb 25 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Mar 4 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Mar 11 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session —City Attorney Evaluation 7,00 p.m. Presentations Mar 18 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Mar 25 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Apr 1 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Apr 8 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Apr 9 City's 1261" Birthday Apr 15 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Apr 22 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations May 6 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Last Updated: August 22, 2013 5 J u 115 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m, Ju122 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 145 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Aug 5 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m, Aug 12 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session — City Manager Evaluation 7:00 p.m. Presentations Aug 19 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Aug 26 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Sep 1 LABOR DAY — City Hail Closed Sep 2 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Sep 9 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p,m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Sep 16 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Sep 23 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Last Updated: August 22, 2013 7 Dec 2 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Dec 9 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL 3;45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Dec 16 Tuesday PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. Dec 23 Tuesday CITY COUNCIL (Possibly cancelled) 3:45 p.m. Oversight Board Meeting 5:00 p.m. Closed Session 7:00 p.m. Presentations Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY — City Hall Closed Jan 'I NEW YEAR'S DAY — City Hall Closed Last Updated: August 22, 2013 9 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ROBERT MAGEE, MAYOR NATASHA JOHNSON, MAYOR PRO TEM BRIAN TISDALE, COUNCIL MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER STEVE MANOS, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER W W W.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (EVMWD) BOARDROOM 31315 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 .................................................................................. TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2013 CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 p.m. PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 p.m. City Hall 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore EVMWD Boardroom 31315 Chaney St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. Due to the seismic retrofit of the Cultural Center, the City Council has moved its regular meeting location to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore. All parking for these meetings is free and is located along Treleven Avenue or at the gravel parking lot on the northwest corner of Treleven and Gedge Avenue. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at the City Clerk's Office on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.lake-elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 262, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 Meeting of August 27, 2013 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION (1a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN #371-020-002 Agency negotiator: City Manager Yates and City Attorney Leibold Negotiating parties: City, Riverside County and Riverside Conservation Authority Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. — EVMWD Boardroom, 31315 Chaney St., Lake Elsinore PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS Introduction of Lake Elsinore Police Posse Certificate of Recognition of Ken Seumalo PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and turn it into the City Clerk. The Mayor will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) (2) Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of August 13, 2013. (3) Warrant List dated August 15 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the Warrant list dated August 15, 2013. City Council Agenda Meeting of August 27, 2013 (4) Investment Report for the month of July 2013 Page 3 of 5 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file report. (5) Construction Contract Awards for Elm Street Project No. 4385-2 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Award the construction of Elm Street to Marathon General, Inc., in the amount of $208,665 with a 10% contingency of $20,800 to be used for construction; B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with Marathon General, Inc.; C.) Award the Construction Geotechnical and Materials Testing Services to GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc., in the amount of $18,640; D.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc.; E.) Award the Construction Survey Services to TKE Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $9,480; and F.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with TKE Engineering, Inc. (6) Notice of Completion for Rosetta Canyon Fire Station and Rosetta Canyon Park Equipment Room Cabinets — Project No 4394 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) File the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder; and B.) Release all retention monies 35 days after the filing of the Notice of Completion. (7) Freeway Maintenance Agreement with State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for "Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs within Caltrans Right of Way Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013-058, approving the form of both the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 Freeway Maintenance Agreement, authorizing staff to submit the draft Freeway Maintenance Agreements to Caltrans, and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 Freeway Maintenance Agreements in their final form (8) Replacement of Diesel Engine for Fire Engine at Station 94 (Canyon Hills) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the replacement of diesel engine for Station 94 fire engine in the amount of $25,000. City Council Agenda Meeting of August 27, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING(S) (9) Page 4 of 5 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Section Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in Order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2013-056 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Negative Declaration No. 2013-01, prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, based on Findings; and B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2013-057 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Adopting the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 Period, and Adopting Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Section Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). APPEAL(S) None BUSINESS ITEM(S) (10) Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2013-1316 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE NO. 2013-1316 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02, AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN, by roll -call vote. (11) Approval of Planting of Memorial Tree Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve planting of a tree in memory of Anthony Devaney at McVicker Canyon Park. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it in to the City Clerk. The Mayor will call on you to speak.) City Council Agenda Meeting of August 27, 2013 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 2013 Perpetual Calendar City Departmental Reports for the Month of July CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 5 The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, September 10, 2013. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at City Hall and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk LAKE, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Pat Kilroy, Director of Lake, Parks & Recreation DATE: August 19, 2013 SUBJECT: Lake, Parks & Recreation Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Mary Santa Cruz, Office Specialist RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The following provides a summary of the Lake, Parks & Recreation Department's programs, activities and events for August 2013: Administration A "Notice to Proceed" was issued on August 19th for the Machado Park Picnic Shelter Improvement Project. A completion date is scheduled for no later than September 20, 2013. Recreation Summer Programs • Final Swim Lesson Registration was held on July 6th • Day Camp excursions for the month of July featured the Library, Canyon Hills Splash Pad, Diamond Cinemas and the LHS Pool. As a special item, staff created a Day Camp CD from photos taken at camp activities, each child received a copy. A total of 179 children participated in Day Camp. Special Events in August • 8/2 — Summer Nights in the Park — Rosetta Canyon Park 8/2 — Free Family Swim Day — Lakeside High School 8/7 — Movies in the Park — Summerlake Park • 8/22 — Mayor's State of the City Address — Diamond Club 8/23 — Lucas Oil AMA Championship Race — Motocross Park • 8/24 — Canyon Lake Wakeboard Club Contest — Inlet Channel Upcoming Special Events for September: • 9/6 — Lucas Oil Regional Race — Motocross Park 9/7 — Free Fishing Day — Lake Elsinore • 9/7 — HHW & E -Waste Collection — Public Works Yard 9/8 — Sideway Sundays — Diamond Stadium 9/14 — Canyon Lake Wakeboard — Inlet Channel 9/15 — EWDC Luncheon w/ Dr. John Husing — Diamond Club 9/28 — City Park Arts & Music Festival — City Park Terra Cotta Gym & Lake Community Center Total attendance for the month of July was 4,683 with 1,302 customer service calls. Skate Park Facility The Skate Park had 0 rentals in the month of July. Total attendance of BMX, Skateboarders and Scooters was 626 and 21 new waivers were signed. Senior Center Attendance: Monthly attendance / service contacts for July totaled 4,350, with 22 days of service, which was a daily average 198 for the month. Publications: The August newsletter is currently available at the center and online, highlighting the activities for August. Trips: 54 seniors attend the Viejas Casino Trip on July 18th, with the bus provided by the Casino. The City van was used by the Smart Walkers for a trip to Live Oak County Park in Fallbrook on July 31 and Ontario Mills Mall on August 7th, filled with 12 passengers each trip. We also took a second trip to Mission Inn Museum & Tour on July 29th, after our first trip filled in June. Our next Casino trip is in Septemberto Pala. Nutrition & Events: The Center was allocated 506 lunches through the Office On Aging for July (23 daily for 22 days of operation) and that program served 509 lunches, so we may be responsible for subsidizing only 3 lunches in July. The Center also served two catered meals as part of our programs (The Patriotic Picnic on July 10th & a special Hamburgers & Hot Dog Day, provided by EVMWD on July 5th), for an additional 71 meals, bringing our monthly meal service to 580. • Programs: The Center provided Cholesterol, Blood Sugar and Blood Pressure screenings; a Workshop on Basic Estate Planning; Healthy Eating Tips: "Quick Healthy Lunch" presentation provided by the Riverside County Department of Public Health & Cal Fresh; Two computerclasses (Basic I & Basic ll); had our $7 haircuts which netted us $98; and an Ice Cream Social which was fun and refreshing. We were activated as a "Cool Center' for 11 days in July. We welcome back Craft Corner and HICAP Services in August, and will offer Sun Damage Screening, Medicare Fraud Prevention Workshop, Medicine Check by Walgreen's Pharmacy, another Ice Cream Social and more in August. • Staff Changes: We recruited anew Senior Center Office Specialist, Rebecca Joynt who began in August. Susan Rauch, our current specialist will be retiring at the end of August after nearly 6 years of service (4+ as the Office Specialist and 15 months as a volunteer receptionist prior to accepting the staff position). She is staying through August to cover vacations and help train the new employee. City of Lake Elsinore Special Events August 20 thru September 30, 2013 Thurs State of the City Address Aug 22 5:00 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. Diamond Club 500 Diamond Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 The program will begin at 5 p.m. with light hors d'oeuvres and networking, followed by the Mayor's State of the City address at 5:30 p.m. All tickets include free admission to the Storm Game following the event, which begins at 7 p.m. Admission is $25 per ticket or corporate table of six (6) is $500. All tickets include admission to game. Reservations required. Fri — Sun Lucas Oil AMA Championship Race Aug 23-25 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Lake Elsinore Motocross Park 20700 Cereal Street Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 MX Sports is proud to bring you the 2nd Annual Lucas Oil Pro Motocross Event. This year's LEMX will serve as the season finale for the Lucas Oil Pro Motocross Championship. Admission is $40.00 per person. Sat Canyon Lake Wakeboard Club Aug 24 Inlet Channel & Levee 500 Diamond Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 It's that time of year again when riders of all ages and abilities ride behind 1 of 2 boats for a score and placing. Page 1 of 4 Fri & Sat Lucas Oil Regional Race Sept 6 & 7 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Lake Elsinore Motocross Park 20700 Cereal Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Lucas Oil Off -Road Racing is back for their Regional Races at the Lake Elsinore Motocross Park. Admission is $10.00. Sat Free Fishing Day Sept 7 All Day The Department of Fish and Game offers two Free Fishing Days each year. On these days, you can fish without having to buy a sport fishing license. Free fishing days provide a great, low cost way to give fishing a try. Sat Household Hazardous & E -Waste Collection Sept 7 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Public Works Yard 512 N. Langstaff Lake Elsinore, California 92530 City and county residents may drop off hazardous household products and electronic discards at no charge during our monthly household hazardous waste disposal events. Limit total chemical load to less than 5 gallons or 50 pounds. Cost is free. Sun Sideway Sundays Sept 8 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Diamond Stadium 500 Diamond Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Hosted by Adams Motorsports Park, come enjoy an exciting day of drifting, motorcycles, gourmet food trucks, vendors, interactive games/contests, and so much more! Page 2 of 4 Sat Canyon Lake Wakeboard Club Sept 14 Inlet Channel & Levee 500 Diamond Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 It's that time of year again when riders of all ages and abilities ride behind 1 of 2 boats for a score and placing. Sun Elsinore Valley Education Foundation Presents: Sept 15 Bingo at the Elks Lodge 1:00 P.M. Elks Lodge 33700 Mission Trail Wildomar. CA 92595 Doors open at noon and games begin at 1:00 p.m. Participants must be 18 years old to play. Admission is $25.00 for 18 games. Thurs After Hours Business Networking Mixer Sept 19 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Lake Elsinore Town Center 32235 Mission Trail Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Join the Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce in the beautifully renovated Lake Elsinore Town Center. Tri -Hosted by: Lake Elsinore Chiropractic, Mission Optometry, & State Farm Insurance. This is a great opportunity to meet other community members and showcase your business with a raffle prize. Refreshments will be provided. Admission is $5.00 for members and $10.00 for non-members. Thurs EWDC Luncheon —An Economic Update by Dr. John Husing Sept 19 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Diamond Club 500 Diamond Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Our monthly luncheons provide members of our business and civic communities the opportunity to network and keep up to date on current issues and events that affect our valley, with special emphasis on the issues that impact our businesses. Keynote speakers address a wide array of topics throughout the year, valuable information and resources are presented and government officials and representatives of private -sector agencies are available for input. Page 3 of 4 Sat Summer Concert Series for Links @ Summerly Sept 21 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. The Links at Summerly 29381 Village Parkway Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Rolling Stones tribute band. $15 each or (6) for $60 - Kids 13 and under free with paid adult admission. No coolers, outside food, or drinks. Lawn chairs are welcome. Fair - style food booth plus bar and beer bar available. Sat City Park Arts & Music Festival Sept 28 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. City Park 243 N. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Join in our 125th Year as we host this inaugural celebration of the arts with great food, free activities, entertainment, original art and awesome music. We'll offer a variety of music during the "Celebration of Music" from 2 to 9 p.m. with everything from Folk to 60's Pop, Flamenco and good of Rock & Roll! Bring blankets or chairs for festival seating. Our Family Faire from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. offers free kids art, Artists Village, craft vendors, puppet show, magic show, old time photos and dancers! Page 4 of 4 CITY OF& LADE- 0LSIr NOIZE DREAM EXTI,FMG CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 16, 2013 SUBJECT: MONTHLY INFORMATION MEMORANDUM JULY/AUG 2013 Pi hlir Wnrkc 'I Pot Hole Repairs Graffiti Removal Graffiti removed from city property Graffiti removed from private property Graffiti Via Web Site Graffiti Via Hotline Graffiti Via Direct to Front Office Storm Drains Cleaned Illegal Dumping Clean-ups Signs Installed Sign Repairs Reflective Pavement Markers Installed Carsonite Markers Installed Cut Back Trees from Blocking Signs Sidewalk repairs (square feet) Curb & Gutter Repairs (square feet) Remove Weeds Removed Illegal Signs Area Sprayed With Herbicide (in Acres) Bobcat Sweeper (various areas) Picked up Shopping Carts 171 583 518 65 8 25 22 25 88 9 46 6 0 0 399 39 32 315 0 0 28 95 641 568 73 2 5 11 9 186 6 31 97 0 2 0 0 45 351 7.5 0 32 2 0 Red Curb LF Trimmed Trees Various Locations 0 7 Cleaned basins with debris 0 0 Sandbag areas 127 0 Drain Inspections 0 0 Grade Road Hazards 0 3 Trash Removal from Road Shoulder 1 0 Removal of Road Hazards 0 13 Dirt Transported (Cubic Yards) 3 3 Installed Guard Rail 36 0 Remove Stickers from Signs 0 25 Crack Seal in Linear Feet 0 0 Install X Walk (Various Locations) 0 0 Heatwurx Repair 15 Event 4 1 Misc. (Work with Camp Crew) 0 6 Repaint Stop Bar and Legends (New Install) 53 0 Sidewalk Inspections locations/areas complete 581 0 Installed New City Logos 11 253 Graffiti Work Orders Complete (24 hrs) 3 10 Graffiti Work Orders Complete (48 hrs) 2 4 Graffiti Work Orders Complete (72 hrs) 1 0 Pothole Work Orders Complete (24 hrs) 0 0 Pothole Work Orders Complete (48 hrs) 0 0 Pothole Work Orders Complete (72 hrs) 16 0 Graffiti Completed ( Work Orders) 567 14 Graffiti Complete (Line of Site) 1 627 Potholes Repaired (Work Orders) 170 0 Potholes Repaired (Line of Site) 88 95 Illegal Dumping (Staff Observed) 0 186 Illegal Dumpin Work Order 17 5 Ue�tcle, Ma%iitenance Vehicle Repairs 13 21 Vehicle Service 1 13 Alignments 15 0 Tire Installation & Repairs 5 19 Small Equipment Repairs 12 6 Service Calls 0 17 Mufflers & Tailpipes 3 0 Body Shop Repairs 12 3 Trailers Repaired 8 11 Batteries & Jump Starts 18 10 Boat Repairs 11 12 Heavy Equipment Repairs 20 14 Vehicle Maintenance Pro ram Fleet 2000 71 20 Lots Cleaned City Lots Cleaned Trees Trimmed WCA Removed Trees and Stumps City Removed Dead Trees/Stumps In Right of Way Loads of Trash & Debris (Green Waste) Illegal Dumping Clean-ups Work Orders Completed Property owner complaints about billing Helped property owner locate their lots & questions Helped Streets Clean Up Alley Ways or Drains Cleaned Weed Abatement Equipment Painted Backflow to Help Prevent Theft Worked on Claims for City Clerk's office or Finance Assisted Code Enforcement in Cleaning up Homeless Camps for Public Safety Replaced Sprinkler Heads, Wiper Seals or Parts Assisted Lakes with Fish kill cleanup Crew Cleaned up Main St Sidewalks & Landscape As Part of Budget Savings Shopping Carts Picked Up Checked all Landscaped areas for Major Issues Removed Illegal Signs Replaced refinished trash cans on Main St. Finished Placinq Rubber Mulch on Railroad Canyon Rd 12 79 22 209 3 0 86 58 27 46 39 30 23 3 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 20 8 0 0 5 18 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1/2 days 6 days 6 0 0 1 da 0 3 0 2 Research Request Plan Check Final Map Grading Street Improvement Development Review Flood Plain Determination Bond Release Request Oversize Transportation Permits Encroachments Permit Applications Encroachment Permit Traffic Issues 3 7 22 25 2 1 9 6 2 8 7 4 1 2 3 4 3 7 11 59 1 3 Survey Country Club Monument Heights Temescal Temescal Canyon Bridge Canyon Rd Design Seismic Retrofit City Hall/Cultural Lake Elsinore Center Sidewalk Heald Avenue, Improvements Sumner SB -821 Avenue, Mill Street This is a multi-year project 60% to re-establish centerline monuments. Caltrans is processing an Preliminary audit of the City's Design preliminary design firm AEI - 100% CASC. Once the audit is complete, full design will commense CITY HALL City staff received EVMWD Mylars (construction plans) approved & signed by City. 100% Anticipate advertise Bid by 8/22/13. approval to place sprinkler system back flow devise CITY HALL underground; EVMWD 900/o completed plan review on Complete 8/2.1 and staff should CULTURA receive comments by 8/23. L CENTER CULTURAL CENTER —80% All concrete work is Complete complete. Steel framing being installed. Seismic ties in the attic are 75% completed. Mylars (construction plans) approved & signed by City. 100% Anticipate advertise Bid by 8/22/13. Traffic Signal Riverside Advertised Bid on 8/15/13; Installation — Drive (NWY Bid opening scheduled Riverside Drive and Grand & 74) and 100% Preliminary design is 85% Traffic Signal Ave and 85% complete. k Signs) Riverside Dr. 9/25/13• Modification — (NWY 74) @ Bid opened 8/8/13; Award Riverside Drive & Lakeside N.S. of Contract scheduled for Lakeside N.S. Paving 100% 0% City Council on 8/27/13. Lake Elsinore Advertised Bid on 8/15/13; Traffic Calming Various Bid opening scheduled Project (Speed School 100% for 9/12/13; Award of Reader/Feedbac locations Contract scheduled for k Signs) within the City 9/25/13• Bid opened 8/8/13; Award Elm Street Elm Street of Contract scheduled for Pavement Paving 100% 0% City Council on 8/27/13. Rehabilitation Construction plans being revised to include use of Main Street rubberized asphalt. Actual Rehabilitation Main Street 99% 0% Construction delayed until Project after the holidays at the request of the Downtown Merchants Assoc. Project' ,Pro eok r , ! Designahstruc#ion �Jfl Rrctjot Changes Gorletion _,., <, Bids opened 7/18/13 with lowest bid $250.068.00 Summerhill Drive Summerhill 100% 0% under engineers estimate. Slurry Seal Drive Award of Contract approved by City Council on 8/13/13. Construction estimated to start mid-S�r. Collier Median Pre -Design meeting held Island Collier Avenue 50% 0% July 17, 2013. Preliminary Modification draft of design received 8/1/13 -- reviewed by staff and comments returned 8/13/13. Construction scheduled to start in January after the holidays as requested by the Outlet Center Mgrrit, City staff finalizing review of Various Freeway Maintenance Welcome to Locations Agreement (FMA) for Lake Elsinore throughout theCaltrans; 95°l0 Approval of Monument Signs City Agreement scheduled for 8/27/13. Lakepoint Park Lakepoint Engineer's Estimate Parking Lot Park completed; preliminary Paving design underway. -1-1 -5/Raliroad 1-15 @ Caltrans, RCTC and Canyon Road Railroad Riverside County are Interchange Canyon coordinating to revive the Improvements Interchange project's environmental (PA E D IPS &E �F process. Traffic Signal and Signal 1-15 @ Conti -oiler Railroad Bid documents being Upgrades Canyon 100% prepared; anticipate Diamond Drive Interchange advertising bid by 8/23/13. @ Railroad Canyon W w LL J a U C O E t m Q. O 0 L_ LL C 7 O U W L Gl Q E m 0 N N m rq � A � \ c ■ o E u § k U./ • ® .� j J 2 r LL § ] / I • LL 2 0 0} k k k E E $ Ln f a co 0 � � E £ + XF j J Ig m a G m m a N W H LL U W r ,n z ES w Y IN F m a W H LL Q U C tll E L t0 a as Q} L_ LL �k 4-1c U 4) .N L dl r,A 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 O O 9 9 0 f- Iti ti O cr co N N N O O O Q T LO N <- G E o d � N Ln N c N 0. C c f r p N E V m 0 C N N 3 U X W Ln 0 N cn a O M t0 r M r M N r in H .y H a c W O U lu [ Ld _ A U LL Q a ji Vl v L 41 ii � 2 ++ a 2 L c N d X 3 W i s U LL. i 0 O. a to h> c H G E o d � N Ln N c N 0. C c f r p N E V m 0 C N N 3 U X W Ln 0 N cn a m a :i 1 I, Vl W r � F LL U LL � W H Zfn Z W Y m m a H Y D: c s O n Q O A 0 O O O O O O-0 (D W M M 0 W O F-- CD d' N N T T O (D T M m W O M M N N r W 00 T to Of M M M LO r 0 N N 1y c w .y w Q c O 41 ULL O i T N O x O 4.H Q A LL A U y c c la L a Q c S s c ea ,� R a +W 3 a= u LL f a O a to l- 7 cu E H a 0 c O C. IA 0 oc c E J IV Ch cu Q y a 3 Ln c_ m f Ln N E c CL Q N U c ao c ko v in E v G 0 a) v a U X V, 0 N N tm (6 Cl- NO m a u 8 N m EI o ro.-O u a m a r T rn a U) u �a C d V V C H U C 0 QI L E NJ a U) C Y 10 C2 C t O r'1 O O O O O O O C N r r r d �zr O r— Nr r r r O N r O r O � 't r r r LO r Qi Ln O cm r M a+ w W H a � O d E a : ii a m d 0 O �+ C ¢ UU LL C7 V 47 VMI rA LL i a F 7 C w P H r O CL W G] w E E o r 0 N r m a L d m a r 11 WO m a TV \ \ \\ \ \\ D 0 cm — m ( _ _ _ CO — ƒ6 ° # a © : , t > \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ ) / } ) } ( °_ ( / ° — \ \ \ \ \ � \ 0 (E \0 c\ CL \ \ 3 , - \ w$ \ 0 co \ ® 2 — \ _ \ ^ \/ \�� \\\CL �� \ C) ^ ~ � e - 0 0 �) - ^ _ ( _{{ —2S _ _ /) [y\ ® _ _ / 9 \\\ /\\ \\ /�) M m J_ \ , / C,4 \\ ((D /f )\ // ƒ\ �(} a.\\ N V v 4- v v 0 0 f0 O O is U > N C� C m O - C L y ry I� CL O O N O N m W � Y G N m- o i •V) - � io h tD d' r -I U uWu i O � 01 CO ill � U U U U O U m Ln C �n h to Ln k 2 L2 W� N V v 4- v v \ � \ \ � z 0 0 F- 5 0 � 0 § LU u C,m ■ Q e Wn 0 I ❑� RR ) z w® / 2 ■-j \ LL w \ 0 § n ■E a § W § § § / § F- LU F - ® z -j o ■ z q x ( k \ \ 00 § 0 § m § ± 0 2 \ C,m e j0 / w m� \} nt co CO C.4 - �3 jk 04 / m n t I . . E « Q } \ \ \ QA jm E _ z a ® - @\ -o / J,/ I »ft )G\ �?_ 0 !)# |§2\ § 5)22 e ±s F 70D part e> pCY 5000 0LL «� 222a »\ § -e )§\© §§ )e#gg a/)£ «z m007E / _ _ > au)CD /}\/ /}/\ 4 ) 2 a & w a �\ CD \ > jA / ? �) \} «\ cli § % Q 72 2n / e� » � _ } \ \OD ]\ rl- n)£ LO CD ® j% ƒ� m a» r 2 z z \m 2ƒ, - �)} ! W0 9 » \}\ f 222\©/j ) ez §{)G .,,! )}§*§\ )\//j§}B\1 §§ L) \]»\G%w \0(6 ¥(D M § 2� o&mo \°}/\K« /\\�§§\\(�� LU ��{ c §-:& \k4» \� e -®o'«]\ jJ§kE\a®«�) ` 4) 2afK oJ)%�a)% �eao/a�� - o-0 �2 cg> ase E2 ! £re 10 goc7-=om 5 Eaa�p>= !\#oRy{E2e EAS-eea\pp 22 M= u: mEc? >EAA §naE,« §, U) U) ee=I =§-°fy%e 02%\o0« o\a_C4 o §o32 )E 2(/ Eo2G Ii jEE <a cL= cm CD % j\ / mE as «E §� j) 2 a dE \z E . 4 n� §j �] E z LO ):®®~/ { § ) »� r2R \ :2§6o !Gm\�z» — £&6}{R=~/ � or=== >!§.a 7�=@»e\ . )\ Z8R if)4fk� /��\\ ).-a)E EE\ {r)])/E% � _0 CD \)}oo 0 \� 0)])30a) \\oa) Co /\ < CL0 0 0>1 «/d/\\/°n t© 2-`f2�~ f�20 >,(D D 2aJ®/ 07 �aE->a) 004 : —_ m e§q)¥%/) a) > = �7�m°3 a) ca) / - {®$%*[f/ — )0 c0 5°!»f&\ r- or 0< I§/ER/QI±s &§§\{a00 c — /2§]\G a) ) 4 N O O O M O r O 0 0 N O N EO to 0) r (C 6 f Q (`� r M (0 0) LO O r O LO N r 61) N fib N O 09, Ff> CY3 0 i N f-- V' co 00 LO N 0) O M N (0 O N V V LO N m Ln LO M I,- LO M Cl) O i r N d d f� „Q 7 E � 3 Z O O O O O r+ OO O O O O M E U-) Ln 0) M O Lo Q 0 M LO O O 0 M m 0 (0 N O f- N N (+j O (A m M 64 co U EfiJ 7 0 VM_ co OO � CD CY) O Q N V N0) mr w (0 M V' CO Lo 00 a' r V N V (D R � 7 E C �) � Z O a+ c O O O O O O N M M W LU Q 7 0 (0 O 00 (D M M 0) co EF3 r — > (00 Ef3 69.6q C\l Gq N O F- 0 61> Z w 7 i r d Q N ON Liz W O O (0 V C14 d) V' N W N M 0 Lo (0 E (0 0 N N Ln m r CY N a Z W M 0 0-0- o 0 f N a) > a7 M Z ,P m O O O W J �1- CLCj C d� F noQ°' ° O F- v m. N Oa) 00 Z .F a) c0 C O n m o m O E N N o w o a) Q C W E c W ❑ IL fp mWN c N _o 'Ci J QY �� C E o'� U0C) W04 U ]_� U) 0i '_ E co N O D Q E O. = � U c p o 0 0 _ N J N i �- N 66 i p l�6 O O s () i E (7 E N LL rn C w U .� U LLL Z a) U N C O `> U C (A (A N Z Z W Z J F' v T c z a) Z_ s Q ,U a w __cn a) (D C) in in r- mC CLm w 0 a a) w Zia l l m W - X �s a> > 0U)m _ c a- WZc co v o._ ( a) 3(n a) �Z(7C7 WI -F -(ns J w cv a w 0 m 0 a)Z i OO�Q a> > 3 a� p o a> as `o U�Qa Y r mam -T'S m u.iLE UULL.a_L,_ m N NU�r CITY OF^ LADELSMOIIE --� ` DREAM EXTREME. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING and INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, will hold a public hearing on August 27, 2013, at the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom, 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, California, 92530, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following items: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02 — ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2014-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT; AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT'S DISTRICT PLANS SECTION IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65302.10) THAT ADDS LANGUAGE REGARDING THE UNINCORPORATED MEADOWBROOK COMMUNITY TO CHAPTER 10.0 (NORTH PEAK DISTRICT), REGARDING THE UNINCORPORATED LAKELAND VILLAGE COMMUNITY TO CHAPTER 13.0 (LAKELAND VILLAGE SPHERE DISTRICT) AND REGARDING THE UNINCORPORATED WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY TO CHAPTER 15.0 (NORTH CENTRAL SPHERE DISTRICT). The City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment and has recommended adoption of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 prepared for GPA No. 2013-02. The City Council will consider the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission for adoption of GPA No. 2013-02 and Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 at the public hearing. Hazardous Materials Statement: The project area (City and its Sphere of Influence) includes sites that have been included on lists of hazardous waste sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. However, the Focus Areas identified in the Housing Element update are not included on the lists of hazardous waste sites. FURTHER INFORMATION on this item may be obtained by contacting Carole Donahoe, Planning Consultant at (951) 674-3124, ext. 287, or by e-mail at cdonahoe(d-Nake-elsinore.org, or Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager at (951) 674- 3124, ext. 209 or by e-mail at rmachott(aNake-elsinore.org. All agenda materials are available for review at City Hall, and the proposed Housing Element, Amendments and the Negative Declaration are available for review on the City's website at h tt p://www. l a k e -e l s i n gEg. o rg . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are hereby invited to attend this public hearing to present written information, express opinions or otherwise present evidence in the above matter. If you wish to legally challenge any action taken by the City on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City prior to or at the public hearing. Please submit all written comments to the address listed below: Mr. Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager Community Development Department — Planning Division City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 E-mail: rmachott@lake-elsinore.org Telephone: 951.674.3124 Ext. 2091Fax: 951.471.1419 t&- - �R �_n& � Virgini0 . Bloorry City Clerk Posted at City Hall on July 24, 2013 Published in the Press Enterprise on August 7, 2013 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF City Council E:1 Redevelopment Agency F-1 Other DEPARTMENT: 3 -,hA � C 0 h CONSENT: APPEAL El BUSINESS: RESOLUTION: F-1 ORDINANCES PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: Report emailed to Clerk s a g a a. a. a s a■■ a■. a a a a a a.■aaaV�� aA�-aa ■ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 a 5 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: . aft a 1 - ■ a a a a a a a a. a a a a a a a.■■. a a a a a. a. a a a a a a.■■ a a a a a a a a a a a .... a a a a .. a a a a a 0 0 0 0 a a a. 1 Submitted by: Approved by: Department H, Finance Direct City Manager: Date: 3' pU Date: Date: Date: )-!' d C I TY OF LAKE LSMO DREAM Q(TKEME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, CITY CLERK DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of August 13, 2013 Prepared by: Diana Gutierrez Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Page 1 of 16 Page 2 of 16 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE EVMWD BOARDROOM, 31315 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2013 ................................................................................................................., CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION 101 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. Mayor Magee called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Manos led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Mayor Magee Mayor Pro Tem Johnson Council Member Manos Council Member Tisdale ABSENT: Council Member Hickman Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, City Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Director Riley, Community Development Director Taylor, Planning Manager MacHott, Lake, Parks, and Recreation Director Kilroy, Public Works Director Seumalo, Police Chief Kennedy -Smith, Fire Chief Barr, Management Analyst Dailey, and Deputy City Clerk Gutierrez. CLOSED SESSION REPORT None PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS • Update on Falls Fire by City Fire Chief • Introduction of new City Police Lt. David Knudson Page 3 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 2 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Fire Chief Barr provided a chronology of the Fall Fire, an overview of the resource management and assignments, and costs incurred. Chief Barr also gave an account of the evacuations and resources for structure defense at Lakeland Village. Mayor Magee expressed his gratitude to Chief Barr and all firefighters on behalf of the citizens of the valley. Peter Lent, Deputy Director of OES (Office of Emergency Services), informed Council that geologists from Caltrans, Riverside County and the National Forest will assess the flood areas for debris flow during the rainy season and keep the City informed of their findings. Council Member Manos expressed his concerns of how the mud flow would affect the quality of the lake water and asked if that is something that can be mitigated. Mr. Lent responded that the water district will also be part of the team to look at what mitigations can be implemented. Mayor Magee recognized the efforts and good work of Caltrans and Director Basem Muallen for their prompt response to the Falls Fire before the fire was contained and for opening the Ortega Road within a week of the fire. Chief Kennedy -Smith introduced new City Police Lieutenants Knudson and Hall to the Council and the community. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE Lindsey Collin introduced Gravity X Dance Studio in the City of Lake Elsinore and announced their enrollment for classes and workshops offered at the dance studio. Mayor Magee announced Consent Item Nos. 3, 5, 7, and 9 to be pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion. CONSENT CALENDAR (1) Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 23, 2013. (2) Warrant List dated July 25, 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the Warrant list dated July 25, 2013 (4) Residential Design Review No 2013-03 - A Request by Ryland Homes for Approval of Building Designs for 106 Single -Family Detached Residential Units Including a Model Home Complex and Related Improvements for a Housing Project Located Within the Summerly Development of the East Lake Specific Plan Page 4 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 3 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (A)Adopt Resolution No. 2013-050 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Findings that the Project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP); and (B)Adopt Resolution No. 2013-051 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Residential Design Review No. 2013-03, based on the Findings and Exhibits, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. (6) Location of Country Club Heights Survey Benchmarks Contract Award Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (A) Award the professional contract to KDM Meridian in the amount of $35,000 for the replacement of survey benchmarks in Country Club Heights area; and (B)Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with KDM Meridian. (8) City Project No 4375 Speed Reader/Feedback Signs Program Supplement Agreement No N007 to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 08-5074R for Federal Aid Proiects Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (A) Adopt Resolution No. 2013-053 approving and authorizing execution of the Federal Safe Routes to School (SRTSL-5074(014)) Program Supplement Agreement No.N007 to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 08-5074R and all subsequent SRTSL-5074(014) project specific Program Supplements; (B) Authorize the City Manager to sign SRTSL-5074(014) Program Supplement No. N007 and all subsequent SRTSL-5074(014) project specific Program Supplement Agreements; and (C) Authorize the City Clerk to return the signed agreement, in duplicate, to Caltrans Office of Local Programs for execution. Motion by Council Member Manos, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson to approve the Consent Calendar, less Agenda Item Nos. 3, 5, 7, and 9; passed by unanimous vote. CONSENT ITEMS PULLED (3) Industrial Design Review No 2013-01 — A Request for a 7,500 Square foot Warehouse/Manufacturing Building Addition and Associated Improvements to an Existing Industrial Building Located at 403 Minthorn Street Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013-049 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Page 5 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Meeting of August 13, 2013 Page 4 of 14 Approving Industrial Design Review No. 2013-01; A Request to Add a 7,500 Square - Foot Addition to the Existing Thermal Electronics, Inc. Industrial Building Located at 403 Minthorn Street. Council Member Manos asked regarding the amendment of the word "shall' to "may" for Condition of Approval No. 69. Planning Manager MacHott explained that the applicant had an option of either constructing the improvements on Collier Avenue or may pay in lieu fees. Council Member Manos asked if there would be any street closures during the curb and sidewalk improvements. Public Works Director Seumalo responded that Collier Avenue will have significant traffic control to allow two-way traffic. Council Member Manos asked if the applicant is going to provide jobs. City Manager Yates responded that the business is an aero defense contractor that has back orders and will be hiring new employees. City Manager Yates also advised that staff will be taking the City's Economic Development subcommittee on a business retention visit to better understand if the company will be hiring short or long term. Motion by Council Member Manos, seconded by Council Member Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2013-049 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California approving Industrial Design Review No. 2013-01; a Request to add a 7,500 square -foot addition to the existing Thermal Electronics, Inc. industrial building located at 403 Minthorn Street; passed by unanimous vote. (5) Community Facilities District No 2005-2 (Alberhill Ranch) Improvement Area B: Altering the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes and Reducing Maximum Bond Authorization Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013-052 of Consideration to alter the rate and method of apportionment of an existing special tax relating to Improvement Area B of City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2005-2 (Alberhill Ranch). Administrative Director Riley provided an overview to Council. City Clerk Bloom read for the record email correspondence received on this item from Ms. Gallina and Ms. Tehrani. Sharon Gallina, resident, stated that she bought her home in 2005 in Alberhill Ranch and that on August 9th it was brought to her attention that Castle & Cooke were requesting a bond to reduce the Community Facilities District taxes for Area B. She stated that Alberhill residents are upset because their commitment to purchase a home in the Alberhill Ranch CFD extends back to 2005. Ms. Gallina stated the tax assessment disclosure states that all perspective purchases in CFD 2005 A, B, and C would have to pay the same Mello -Roos taxes. She offered that if the taxes in area B are reduced, then who is going to want to buy her home. Paulie Tehrani, resident, stated that she lives on Ash Street in CFD 2005-A and would like to see Council wait on this matter since the housing market is climbing. She stated that houses are selling and the values of their homes are increasing therefore, if the City waits the bonds will be higher and closer to what they are presently paying for CFD 2005-A which is 2.86%. Ms. Tehrani stated that the proposed lower assessments will be a 62% less from what she is currently paying and the new homeowners will have full access to the same facilities. She asked if there will be money to complete the improvements they were promised when she Page 6 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 5 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 purchased her home. Ms. Tehrani implored Council to table Agenda Item No. 5 to a later date and take into consideration what Council can do to help home owners that will be affected. Mayor Magee asked if this was a discretionary action. Danny Kim, Bond Counsel with Norton, Rose, and Fulbright, responded that action on this item is discretionary. Mayor Magee stated Council could deny, table, or approve the Resolution. Mr. Kim concurred with Mayor Magee. Tom Tomlinson, representative of Castle & Cooke stated that he did not understand how lowering the tax rate would devalue the homeowner's house. He stated Castle & Cooke is trying to get the tax rate aligned with the current housing market and with what people can afford. Mr. Tomlinson stated if the property values go up there will be more bond capital available. He also stated that by lowering the bond rate they have more money for the improvements from the home and lot sales. Mr. Tomlinson said that Castle & Cooke feels it is a better situation to have a lower tax rate. Mayor Magee asked about Castle & Cooke's existing customers that have already purchased homes. There is a reduction table that shows that new home buyers would be paying significantly less tax rate. Mr. Tomlinson concurred with Mayor Magee and offered that homes that were bought in a different market and time, and the values did dropped. The portion that goes against the CFD is fixed and so the overall percentage is higher. Mayor Magee stated that as a decision Council struggles with what they see as a potential penalty to Castle & Cooke's existing customers and City constituents. Mayor Magee pointed out that Lake Elsinore is the fastest growing city in the county and third fastest growing city in the state and yet Castle & Cooke is not building anything. Mr. Tomlinson stated that there is a different philosophy at Castle & Cooke's corporate office on whether or not they will be building or selling lots. Mayor Magee stated that the City does not have an answer from Castle & Cooke regarding the schedule of improvements which are significant to the community and those that are 5 to 10 years away. Mr. Tomlinson stated that it depends on how quickly the projects are built out. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson stated that the tax rate in Area B is being reduced to make it in line to be affordable. Mr. Tomlinson stated that there is an industry -wide move to try to reduce CFD taxes on developments. He stated that there is a change in their industry that has changed how things are approved and what builders can actually pay for. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson stated she heard Mr. Tomlinson say that Ryland Homes are selling at the same tax rate. Mr. Tomlinson responded in affirmative. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson asked what is the purpose of lower the tax rate if they are selling at the higher tax rate. He answered that Castle & Cooke want to lower the overall tax rate on the development. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson stated that Council heard from constituents that this would decrease the value of their homes, and asked why would we lower the tax rate in Area B and keep Area A at a higher tax rate; and asked what benefit does it have for the homeowners to stay. Mr. Tomlinson replied that the existing property owners bought at a certain price and tax rate, however no one would have anticipated house values being cut in half. Council Member Manos stated the perception is that there is a win or loss for the developer, however the improvements don't change, just the method of how they are financed. Council Member Manos expressed his dislike for CFDs because they mask the true cost of home ownerships. It is his opinion that this is a solid request by the developer because it creates transparency for the true cost of homeownership for future homebuyers in that area. Page 7 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 6 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Council Member Manos expressed that if there is a way to reduce the CFD tax rates for the new homeowners, he is in favor of it. Council Member Tisdale asked why Area C was not included in this request. Mr. Tomlinson responded that it was the consultant's suggestion to look at Area C at a later time. Council Member Tisdale stated that by lowering the tax rate, does this mean there is potential to build there. Mr. Tomlinson replied by lowering the tax rate it encourages builders to come and build. Council Member Tisdale stated that this item requires a public hearing and participation of the property owners and asked who the property owners are. Administrative Services Director Riley responded that Castle & Cooke is the only property owner. Council Member Tisdale asked Administrative Director Riley where Area A falls in review of the City's CFDs for refunding. Director Riley responded that he asked Mr. Gunn, the City's financial consultant, and unfortunately because of the change in bond rates in recent months the homeowners are actually paying a better rate now as opposed to a refunding. Council Member Manos asked if there was a disproportion to allocations for improvements in Area A. Administrative Director Riley stated that it was his understanding that homeowners in Area A did not pay more as it was equally split over the three (3) areas and the maximum special taxes and bonded indebtedness was established for each improvement area at that time. Council Member Manos asked if by reducing the tax rate in Area A, does it not create a burden or potential increase in cost in Area A. Director Riley responded in the affirmative and stated that it is separate bond issue for that area. Mayor Magee expressed his concern that he did not understand the impacts on the existing homeowners and the roadway improvement that the City was promised. He asked why Area A can't be added to this refinance. Danny Kim explained that Area A has already issued bonds and so there are bond owners that were promised that the CFD would be levying taxes at a certain rate. He added that once you start reducing that security for the bond holder then you are subjecting yourself to an action by the bond holders for impairing their rights under the bond documents. That is the reason why they are hamstrung from being able to modify the improvement Area A taxes. Motion by Council Member Tisdale, seconded by Mayor Magee, to table this item to February 2014 with direction to staff to address the impacts on the existing homeowners and the timing of the significant infrastructure of the entire area; passed by a vote of 3-1 with Council Member Manos opposing. (7) Annual Slurry Seal Program Summerhill Drive from Canyon Estates to Via De La Valle Proiect No. 4391 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Award the Annual Slurry Seal Program for Summerhill Drive (Canyon Estates Drive to Via De La Valle) to Pavement Coating Company in the amount of $213,932.00 with a 10% contingency. Council Member Tisdale stated that the original cost for this project is $470,000 and the bid came in at $213,932. Public Works Director Seumalo affirmed. Council Member Tisdale asked what the City is going do with the savings. Public Works Director Seumalo responded that there are several requests for road improvements that staff is currently evaluating. Council Page 8 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 7 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Member Tisdale stated it is good news when the City saves money and the costs of projects are less than anticipated. Motion by Council Member Tisdale, seconded by Council Member Manos, to award the Annual Slurry Seal Program for Summerhill Drive (Canyon Estates Drive to Via De La Valle) to Pavement Coating Company in the amount of $213,932.00 with a 10% contingency; passed by a unanimous vote. (9) Award of Contract to Bucknam & Associates for Pavement Management Program Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a three year service contract (including annual reviews by staff and approval by City Council) with Bucknam & Associates for pavement condition and preservation recommendations. Council Member Manos stated that this company has had a contract with the City for three (3) years and he has never seen a report. Council Member Manos asked what type of service the company provided. Public Works Director Seumalo responded that they provide a status report of street conditions and maintenance recommendations. He added that the lack of funding and the deferring of maintenance only expands the costs. Council Member Manos asked for a copy of the report. City Manager Yates pointed out that staff has been focusing on paving dirt roads for the last five (5) years and that it is planned to bring a detailed plan on all the slurry seals and road improvement programs in the next few months. Motion by Council Member Manos, seconded by Council Member Tisdale, to authorize the City Manager to execute a three year service contract (including annual reviews by staff and approval by City Council) with Bucknam & Associates for pavement condition and preservation recommendations; passed by a unanimous vote. PUBLIC HEARING(S (10) Specific Plan Amendment No 2013-02 — The Tenth Amendment to the East Lake Specific Plan to (1) Change the Land Use Designation of Planning Area 46 From Open Space to Residential -1 Which Allows Up to 6 Dwelling Units Per Acre. The Total Number of Residential Units in the Approved East Lake Specific Plan Will Not Change and (2) to Amend the Design Review Process to Designate the Planning Commission as the Final Decision -Maker on Residential Design Review Projects. Revision to Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 — Consistent With the Proposed Specific Plan Amendment change in the Land Use Designation of Planning Area 46 from Open Space to Residential -1 which allows up to 6 Dwelling Units Per Acre; a Revision to Tentative Tract Map No 31920 is Proposed to Create 17 Single -Family Residential Lots Environmental Clearance for the Projects are Provided by the Final EIR for the East Lake Specific Plan in Conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Page 9 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 8 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (A) Waive further reading and introduce by title only Ordinance No. 2013-1316AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02, AMENDMENT NO. 10, TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN, by roll call vote; (B) Adopt Resolution No. 2013-055 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving a Revision to Tentative Tract Map No. 31920, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. Mayor Magee opened public hearing at 8:06 p.m. Planning Manager MacHott provided an overview to Council. There being no speakers, Mayor Magee closed the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. Council Member Tisdale moved staff's recommendation, which was seconded by Council Member Manos. Mayor Magee expressed his concern about designating the Planning Commission as the final decision -maker of the Residential Design Review process. He asked City Attorney Leibold if the City could implement a mechanism that advises the City Council that an action has been taken by the Planning Commission and that Council have an opportunity of appeal. City Attorney Leibold responded that there are a number of ways Council could go about it; Council could impose a provision that allows for the Planning Commission to take action and then City Council have a "receive and file" on its Consent Calendar and in the event that Council wants to hear the item it would schedule the item for a hearing for the following Council meeting. Another option is that Council can keep the existing process where design review comes to Council or it could adopt a ministerial administrative process where staff notifies the Council after every Planning Commission meeting of the actions taken. Council Member Manos noted that all utilities to be placed underground except for power lines over 12,000 KV. Public Works Director Seumalo responded that the limit of 34.5 KV is not permitted underground. Mayor Magee stated that he still did not have resolution on the safeguard of having staff advise Council and that it has not worked in the past. He asked if having the Design Review come to the Council as a "receive and file" would delay the applicant an extra two or three weeks. City Attorney Leibold responded that it could delay the applicant and although the item would be presented as a Consent Calendar item and not a public hearing, the "receive and file" process would allow for a second meeting to "consider" the matter if the Council requested review. The process has the potential to cause further delay and does not provide for final action by the Planning Commission which is what the applicant has requested. Mayor Magee stated that the City has an excellent Planning Commission at the present time, but it does not mean that the Planning Commission will always stay the same. Mayor Magee stated that he would feel more comfortable with safeguards in place and asked to Page 10 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 9 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 amend the motion to include all items approved by the Planning Commission to come as a "receive and file" to the City Council and the City Council can appeal for the Design Review. Council Member Tisdale moved, and Council Member Manos seconded, to waive further reading and introduce by title only Ordinance No. 2013-1316; and to include all items approved by the Planning Commission to come as "received and file" to the City Council and the City Council can appeal the Design Review. City Clerk Bloom read Ordinance No 2013-1316 by title and upon a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. Council Member Manos moved, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to adopt Resolution No. 2013-055 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approving a revision to Tentative Tract Map No. 31920, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval; passed by a unanimous vote. (11) Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore California Establishing Underground Utility District No. 3 Lakeshore Drive from Mohr Street to Chaney Street Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution No. 2013-054 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, declaring the formation of Underground Utility District No. 3, Lakeshore Drive from Mohr Street to Chaney Street, and ordering removal and undergrounding of poles, overhead wires, and associated overhead structures. Mayor Magee opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. Public Works Director Seumalo presented an overview to City Council. There being no speakers, Mayor Magee closed the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. Council Member Manos moved, seconded by Council Member Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2013-054; motion passed by a unanimous vote. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson stated that the staff report provides an estimated cost of the project however the project will not start until 2015, does staff anticipate there being enough money for the project. Public Works Director Seumalo responded that staff has had this discussion with the City's Edison representative and feels confident. APPEAL(S) 0rom BUSINESS ITEM(S) (12) Lake Use Fees for Motorized and Non -Motorized Vessels Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize a temporary waiver of Lake Use fees for non -motorized vessels that are not required to be Page 11 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Meeting of August 13, 2013 Page 10 of 14 registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles, effective immediately and terminating December 31, 2013. Lake, Parks, and Recreation Director Kilroy provided an overview to City Council. Council Member Manos asked if the City could eliminate the fee permanently. Director Kilroy responded that it may come to that when the rest of the lake use fees are presented to Council, however this is the quickest way to grant relief while staff conducts research on fees. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson stated that the residents need to be informed that the non - motorized vessels can be launched for free from the public beach. Council Member Tisdale stated that he was fine with the City residents using the lake for free, but that a lot of people that do not live in the City or pay taxes visit the lake. He stated there should be special consideration for City residents. Mayor Magee thanked Director Kilroy for his work. Mayor Magee also stated that he has received a number of complaints this season from people that just want to use a paddle board and were charged a fee and that he did not see that as reasonable. He shared the concerns that visitors should pay a fee, so that the City can maintain its lake and parks. Mayor Magee stated that one way might be to have staff look into what it takes for the City to permit its own gas dock as there is no place to legally fuel up anywhere within the lake perimeter. If staff we could find a way to permit a gas dock, the City could capture that revenue. Council Member Manos moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to authorize a temporary waiver of Lake Use fees for non -motorized vessels that are not required to be registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles, effective immediately and terminating December 31, 2013; passed by a unanimous vote. (13) Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.46 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Regarding Public Safety Advisory Commission; and Recruitment for the Public Safety Advisory Commission Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions in regards to the Public Safety Advisory Commission: (A) Waive further reading and introduce by title only Ordinance No. 2013- 1317AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 2.46 PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION; and (B) Review the proposed timeline and direct staff to complete the recruitment to fill existing vacancies on the Commission. Page 12 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 11 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 City Manager Yates presented an overview to City Council. Management Analyst Dailey provided an overview of the proposed recruitment and timeline for the appointments to the Public Safety Advisory Commission. Mayor Magee asked if the applicants who have already applied will continue to be considered during this recruitment process. Management Assistant Dailey responded in the affirmative. Chris Hyland, resident, questioned the objective and need for the Public Safety Advisory Commission. She also questioned the Commission Members' education and training to address public safety issues and felt that those issues should be overseen by the Engineering Department or Police Department. Ms. Hyland also stated that none of her public safety concerns have been brought forth for the betterment of the citizens in Lake Elsinore. Lastly, Ms. Hyland expressed her opinion to disband the Public Safety Advisory Commission. Council Member Manos stated that it was good for the community to access ways to improve City committees and commissions. He noticed in the revised ordinance Section 2.46.060 (b) and (c) was no mention of lake safety; however, under section (d) PSAC is being asked to reach out to organizations. Council Member Manos asked to add lake safety to the scope for PSAC. He commented that PSAC has been fairly productive during the past eight (8) years and noted good ideas that were implemented. Council Member Manos liked the regular casual dialog between the public and PSAC which was conducive to good ideas such as CERT; the Life Jacket Program, See Click Fix, High Speed Zone Ordinance; loud party ordinance; restricted RV; hotel age check ordinance; panhandling ordinance; newspaper box ordinance; traffic, graffiti ordinance; vicious dog ordinance, and helped reestablished the multi -family crime free housing. Council Member Manos stated that the Commission is valuable and productive and is in favor of maintaining the Commission. He asked that lake safety and CERT oversight be added to the Ordinance. Council Member Tisdale stated that when he came on the Council in 2010 the PSAC was on hiatus for 18 months and Council brought the Commission back. There were some boat dock issues. Council Member Tisdale stated that when he went to Lakeland Village to address the boat dock issues however he did not remember any PSAC Commissioners present to address safety issues on the Lake while he took a tongue lashing from Lakeland Village residents. Council Member Tisdale noted inconsistencies, grammatical errors, and conflicting verbiage throughout the ordinance. He had a problem with the recommendation regarding the PSAC's role in the disaster plan preparedness and crisis management and stated that these functions require special training and that Commissioners who are not trained and certified in or understand NIMS, shouldn't be providing recommendations to disaster preparedness. This function should be addressed by experts and presented to the City Council. Lastly, he asked the City Manager to evaluate whether he believes that PSAC can really serve a purpose. Council Member Tisdale stated that he attended PSAC meetings and saw Commissioners badger staff by trying to test law enforcement, Fire safety, and direct Parks and Lake personnel to do things. That is not the purpose of the Page 13 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 12 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 PSAC and he is glad that this ordinance will more clearly define the Commissioners' roles. He does not want another Commission that is going to take more time away from limited staff or too much time at meetings. During the time of the PSAC hiatus, he did not receive a lot of emails that indicated there were any problems in the City. He pointed out speeding issues on Lake Street, but that issue was addressed by Public Works Director Seumalo. He wants a commission that makes sense and not to cause hate and discontent. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson pointed out a statement in Section 2.46.060 (i) as confusing because it talks about hearing the citizens' complaints but then it relates to traffic. She thinks that the City Council members have addressed that there should be more areas within the scope of the PSAC and that if the PSAC is going to hear from our citizens it should not just be traffic related concerns. She wants to underscore the bottom line to staff to make sure that the section regarding citizen complaints should say "designated by the City Manager or report back to citizens within a reasonable time period." She thinks that is the key element to what citizens have expressed to Council. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson asked for clarification of Section 2. Lastly, she asked that consistent language be added to 2.46.060 (A) and throughout the entire ordinance. Mayor Magee recommended that this item be continued off calendar. He agreed with Council Members Manos' suggestion to add lake safety as part of the PSAC oversight. Mayor Magee expressed that he did not want CERT oversight by the Commission. He also agreed with Council Member Tisdale and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson. A year and half ago there was a study session where Council mandated that PSAC report quarterly to the City Council and they failed to do that; that mandate also needs to be included in the Ordinance. Regardless of whether it is a written or verbal presentation, there needs to be accountability and the Commission needs to come in front of the Council to explain what it is doing and why. When PSAC was approved in 2004 there was a feeling of disenfranchisement between certain elements in the community and law enforcement. Mayor Magee spoke about a shooting on his street that his son witnessed and that it took 40 minutes for a police officer to show up at the scene. Mayor Magee stated that the City has dedicated resources to improve public safety and has driven down every category of criminal behavior over the last decade. Council has made public safety its number one priority. The PSAC has been on the books for 20 years through 2010 and it did some outstanding work. This is the opportunity to refocus and give clear direction. Mayor Magee moved, which was seconded by Council Member Tisdale, that staff consider all the input received tonight, continue this item off calendar and bring this item back to Council when the document is ready to be approved by this Council. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson is concerned that by taking this item off calendar would delay the recruitment process and asked how much longer the process be delayed. City Manager Yates responded that staff can have this item back in 30 days, and the Commission can still start in November or December of this year. Staff has clear direction to rewrite the Ordinance and will rewrite the correct Ordinance with all of Council's comments incorporated. Page 14 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes Page 13 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 The motion passed by unanimous vote. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES Julian Suarez addressed Council on behalf of the residents on Larson Road regarding a gate located at the end of a trail on Larson Road. Mr. Suarez reported that this past year there have been various incidents of loitering and pedestrian traffic on their street and there has been an increase of graffiti and theft. He also spoke about a murder in which the suspect escaped through the gate because it has public access. The residents are requesting that the gate be closed by the City. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS None. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS None CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Manos thanked the Commissioners that served on the PSAC for the past eight (8) years. They are volunteers that gave their time and he appreciates what they have done for the City. Council Member Manos stated that he had the opportunity to survey damages caused by the Fall Fire and thanked Cal Fire, police, Forestry Service, American Red Cross, Supervisor Kevin Jeffries, City staff, and colleges. Lastly, he thanked the construction crew that worked on getting the Ortega Road open a week ahead of time. Council Member Manos also acknowledged City of Temecula, Mayor Naggar and City of Canyon Lake, City Manager Harrington for offering their support. He reminded the public to stay vigilant about fire safety and disaster preparedness. Council Member Tisdale welcomed the new police Lieutenants Knudson and Hall. He stated that Cal Fire always does an excellent job and makes sure that the residents are well protected. He also thanked Police Chief Kennedy -Smith and staff. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson congratulated both Lieutenants Knudson and Hall and congratulated Lieutenant Anne on his new assignment. She announced a Franchise workshop on Thursday, August 15th at Storm Stadium from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. She also spoke about the emails that she received from an animal advocate petition for "California Stop the Great Bull Run." She offered that there is no special event permit on file. She offered that communication should be filtered through Bruce Keeton who will help the public understand where the Lake Elsinore motor cross stands and where the event is scheduled to be held. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson announced Jersey Mike's ribbon cutting ceremony. That franchise was a collaboration between the Chamber of Commerce and City of Lake Elsinore. She invited the public to visit the Jersey Mikes. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson spoke about the Fall Fire and was impressed by how rapidly staff responded and activated the Emergency Operation Center (EOC) activated. She reminded the public to have their families prepared for these types of situations. Page 15 off6 Regular City Council Minutes Page 14 of 14 Meeting of August 13, 2013 Mayor Magee thanked CERT team members; Trauma Intervention Counseling staff that worked with people who were evacuated; and Animal Friends of the Valley for opening an emergency animal shelter. He also stated that a local business owner showed up with 100 cheese burgers for the volunteers. Mayor Magee also spoke about the verbal and written abuse received from the public for not being aggressive enough with Caltrans in getting the roadway open. Staff will debrief from this emergency and improve. This Council recently approved an insurance policy to covers the City's wild land fire areas, so the City is covered. Mayor Magee also reported that the City has added three (3) fire stations over the course of ten (10) years. Any thought of reducing fire protection services capabilities in this county is not a prudent course of action and urged everyone to stay the course. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Magee adjourned this meeting at 9:04 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on Tuesday, August 27, 2013. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at City Hall and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. Robert E. Magee, Mayor Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Page 16 of 16 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF : `. ; -0 i'j- 5�1 City Council DEPARTMENT: 171 CONSENT: APPEAL _ BUSINESS: Redevelopment Agency Other RESOLUTION: Ej ORDINANCES F--] PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: k� s Report emailed to Clerk a a.■■ s s s.■ a s s. a r a s s s a s s s a a a a a a a a s s s s s s a s s s s s . r y e s *sass ■ s a s s s s. a s a. i FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■ s s a a. a. a a a a 0 0 0. 0 a. a s s a .. r s a s a■■. s a a a s a s s a a s a a. a a s a s a s■. r a a a a. a. a s a s a a. a r Submitted by: Date; Approved by: Department Head: Date: Finance Director: Date: City Manager: Date: CITY OF LADE LSII` OKE �s DREAM EXTREME `TM REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED AUGUST 15, 2013 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated August 15, 2013 niscuccinn The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued since the prior warrant list. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II Reviewed By: James R. Riley Director of Admi istrative Services Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 8-15-2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Page 1 of 7 Page 2 of 7 AUGUSY ], 2013 C11TY 0 I ILAIKIE ;EiLSIIN0RE WARRANT SUMMARY Ft3N W FLJN7) DFSQ RIl"I'1ON 'FO"f'AL 100 GENERAL FUND $ 2,114,932.14 101 SUPLMNT. LAW ENF. SVC, FUND 11 782.64 104 TRAFFIC OFFENDER FUND _ 10,892.76 105 MISC. GENERAL PROJECT FUND _ _ 23,924.89 108 MISC, GRANT FUND 86,216 58 110 STATE GAS TAX FUND _ 74,229.78 112 TRANSPORTATION/MEASURE A FUND _ 25 558.64 114 SBI 186 CAS EDUCATION FUND _ _ _ 1.00 115 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND _ 5,477.11 116 CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS DIF FUND 162.00 130 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND 107 532.40 135 L.L.M.D. NO. 1 FUND __ 1,374.00 150 C.D.B.G. FUND 13.87542 155 CSA 152 - N.P.D.E.S. FUND 11,528 36 160 C.D.B.G FUND _ 742.50 204 SIGNAL C.I.P. FUND _ 630.00 231 LIBRARY C.I.P. FUND __ 7,638.48 235 2011-A BOAT LAUNCH CONSTRUCTION 1,584.00 356 A.D. 90-1A DEB SVC FUND 604.77 374 C.F.D. 2005-4 LAKE VIEW VILLAS DEBT SERVICE FUND 500.00 378 C.F.D. 2006-8 RUNNING DEER DEBT SERVICE FUND 500.00 381 C.F.D. 2006-10 RIVERLAKE VILLAS DEBT SERVICE FUND 500.00 382 C.F.D. 2006-9 TRIESTE DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,000.00 386 C.F.D. 2007-4 MAKENNA COURT DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,000.00 387 C.F.D. 2007-5 RED KITE DEBT SERVICE FUND 500.00 606 AB2766 AIR POLUTION RDCTN FUND 9,985 73 617 SUCCESSOR AGENCY RDA HOUSING FUND 500.00 620 COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FUND 35,038.79 650 C.F.D. 2003-1 LAW & FIRE SERVICE DEBT SERVICE FUND 115,564.74 651 C.F.D. 2006-5 PARK, OPEN SPACE, STORM DRAINS DEBT SERVICE FUND 500.00 653 C.F.D. 2009-1 PARKS & LIGHTING FUND 500.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 2,664,776.73 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 1 of 1 Page 3 of 7 AUGUST 15, 2013 Cl'TY OF iLAKE ELSINORE WARRANT LIST CHECK4! VFNDOR NAME AMOUNT 111612 VOID-UUWNS ENEKUY 112796 VOID-GUSTAVO POLETTI (2925) 113883 VOID -RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES _ _. (8000.00) 115212- - _ VOID-SALLIE DAVIS (30 24) 115323-115324 -- - AMERICAN EXPRESS (41003) _ _.. $ 5,554.18 115325-115327 AMERICAN EXPRESS (71001) _10 310.57 115328 AMERICAN EXPRESS (71002) _ _ 158.08 115329 AMERICAS - TEMECULA 272.66 115330 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC. __. _.._ 475.00 115331 CAMBERN & CENTRAL INVESTORS LLC 221,706.00 115332 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC _ 90870 115333 CDW GOVERNMENT,. INC 5,721.39 115334-115339 E. V. M. W. D. _. _.. _ _ _ 74,171 98 115340 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT _ 2,500 00 115341 EXPRESS DRY CLEANERS _ _ 37720 115342 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION _ _. _. 131.06 115343 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS _. 25600 115344 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST _.1,940.00 115345 IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS _ _. 394.29 115346 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS _. _..._. _... 1,636.17 115347 LAKE CHEVROLET -PARADISE GROUP _. 35,545,50 115348 ORRIN LARSEN 68.00 115349 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN .43094,04 115350 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC 49.95 115351-115354 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC. _. _... 2,550.51 115355 MK GRAPHIC DESIGN & MARKETING _. 3 412.80 115356 RBI TRAFFIC288000 -610800 115357 RISHA ENGINEERING GROUP INC __ 115358 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. 1,153.60 115359 SEA PAC ENGINEERING, INC. _. _. 8270658 115360-115367 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO _. _.. 58,27937 115368 TIME WARNER CABLE _. _. 228.36 115369 VERIZON CALIFORNIA _.. _. _. _.... 930.73 115370 VERIZON WIRELESS (#3) _ _._ __ _.... _ 13102 115371 VERIZON WIRELESS (#4) 41.90 115372 VERIZON WIRELESS (#5) 45.19 115373 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING 13,910 00 115374 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY _ 5000 115375 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 47,044.31 115376 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVT'S _.. _. 307 514.02 115377 ABOVE ALL NAMES CONSTRUCTION INC. _ 7,160.37 115378 ADVANTAGE VENDING SERVICES _ _ 720.85 115379 ALL -PRO -ENGINE&MOWER SUPPLY _. _ _ 32670 115380 BEE FRIENDLY 300,00 115381 BOOS DEVELOPMENT WEST, LLC _ _7,697.71 115382 BURROW BLASTERS USA _. _.. 500.00 115383 CA SOCIETY OF MUNI FINANCE OFFICERS _ 150.00 115384 CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLERS OFFICE 100.00 115385 CENTURY LINK _.. 2,255.85 115386 CMSBUSINESSFORMS INC. _. _._. _..... __1,27308 115387 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 475,00 115388-115389 CTAI PACIFIC GREENSCAPE 13,040.00 115390 RITA DAVIS _.. _.210000 115391 DRYSTAL DAY _.. _.... 125.00 115392 MIRIAMDELLER_.._.. _.... __.... _ 7000 115393 DIRECTV.. _.... _ 9499.. 115394 DISH NETWORK - _.... _...... 9027 115395 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING INC _. __1 025.00 115396 ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER CO _. _ __ 321.99 115397ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER _ 30,504.00 115398. _... EWING.. 98398.. 115399 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS ___... __ 128.00 115400 RICKY GARCIA _ _ ___ ___. 3000_ 8/2 012 01 3 Warrant 08 1513 1 OF 4 Page 4 of 7 AUGUST 25, 2023 (CITY OF LAKE ;E;LSINOR'E WARRANT LIST Cl GCK71 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 115401GLS PLUMBING, LLC _... ba/.un 115402.. _.. _.... _. GRANICUS INC _..... 911.20 115403 GRILLO FILTER SALES, INC. 273.89 115404 HAZZARD BACKFLOW CO. _ 75.00 115405 --HOGLE-IRELAND, INC _.556500 115406 INLAND EMPIRE LOCK & KEY _ 20&04 115407 L & M FERTILIZER, INC 95,17 115408 LESLIE'S SWIMMING POOL SUPPLIES _. 151.20 115409 NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC _ 64.63 115410 PACIFIC AGGREGATES __ 357.91 115411 PERLMUTTER PURCHASING POWER _ 1,977.76 115412 GUSTAVO POLETTI 180.37 115413 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE _.. _. 783.30 115414 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 136.52 115415 SHANNON RAMIREZ _ 35.00 5 00115416 115416 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES _800000 115417 WENDY RICO __. _.... 3500 115418 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES INC. _... _.. _ 3,092,03 115419 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER 92.00 115420 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH _ 336.00 115421 ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ _ __ 209.07 115422 KATHLEEN R. SMITH _. _._ _ 32625 115423-115424 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. _8 706.80 115425 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO __ 177.02 115426 STAT KEY COMPANY _. _ _ _ 1,058.75 115427 STAUFFERS LAWN EQUIPMENT _. __. _ __. 129.55 115428 STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA 350.00 115429 SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENG SOLUTIONS, INC. _.. 16,705.18 115430 THOMAS CATERING _... _ 400.00 115431 TUSCANY HILLS LANDSCAPE & REC. CO _ 3 56 115432 VENUS PRINTING _ _. _ 3024 115433-115435 VERIZON CALIFORNIA _ __ 8,211.58 115436 VIEVU, LLC _.. __ 43800 115437 VISTA PAINT CORPORATION __.. _ _. 533.92 115438 WEST COAST SERVICES _ _ 45000 115439-115440 ACTION GAS & WELDING SUPPLY _. _ 25000 115441 ALL -PRO ENGINE &MOWER SUPPLY _. _.. _ _ 293.52 115442 ALLEGRA MARKETING PRINT MAIL 727.92 115443 AMBER AIR CONDITIONING, INC. __.. 1,693.29 115444 AMERICAN ALLIANCE DRUG TESTING _ _ ._127500 115445 AMERICAN BATTERY SUPPLY _ 733.06 115446 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES _._.. 492.96 115447 AMERICAN MATERIAL CO. __.. 264.56 115448 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEY _ 13,991.25 115449 APPLE ONE ___ ...215880 115450 BANK OF AMERICA, (FIRE) _. __. _. 44753 115451 BANK OF AMERICA (FIRE) _. _. _. 56474 115452 BANK OF AMERICA, (CITY) _ 397.77 115453 BANK OF AMERICA, (POLICE _ _127627 115454 BANK OF AMERICA, (FIRE) _.. _... _. 21479 115455 BANK OF AMERICA, (CITY) 1,101.39 115456 BANK OF AMERICA, (CITY) 332.96 115457 BANK OF AMERICA, (CITY) _ 167.00 115458 BANK OF AMERICA, (FIRE) __.. _ _ _ 694.49 115459 BATTERY SYSTEMS, INC. _ 660.51 115460 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 790.00 115461 BOATSWAIN'S LOCKER, INC. 88169 115462 MATTHEW BROWN __609375 115463 BTI CHEMICAL CO., INC. _._ __. _ 232.35 115464-115466 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC. 23 620.55 115467 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP _.. 604.77 115468 BURROW BLASTERS USA 50000_ 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 2 OF 4 Page 5 of 7 AUGUST �5, 2013 CITY OF LAKE If LSPNOI E WARRANT LIST LHIiCK4 VIiNI)OR NAME AMOUNT 115469 C. R, & R., INC. _ 13,767.25 115470 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY CO. _. 1,444.07 115471 CANYON LATE MIDDLE SCHOOL 68000 115472 CANYON TIRE SALES, INC. __. _ 30374 115473 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 81618 115474 CITRON INC DBA PLANPACKS 93.89 115475 CITRUS BELT CHAPTER _ 7500 115476 CM WASH EQUIPMENT 333637 115477 CMS BUSINESS FORMS, INC. _. 1,431.06 115478-115479 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS, INC. - 1,956.60 115480 - KIRTCOURY __.. __. 562500 115481 CUTTING EDGE STAFFING, INC. _. _._ 462413 115482 CYNETTE PUBLIC FINANCIAL CONSULTANT 4,550.00 115483 D& S ELECTRIC _. ..529900 115484 DAPEER, ROSENBILT & LITVAK, LLP _.. 317.58 115485 RITA DAVIS _. 46500 115486 DELTA SERVICES _ _. 6264 115487DETRIOT INDUSTRIAL TOOL 100.08 115488. DIAMOND .. _..... _. 304.80 115489 CAROLE DONAHOE A.I.C.P. 2,775.00 115490 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING, INC. 15,839.32 115491 MARGARET ANN DRAKE _. 19800 115492 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. __. _. 825.00 115493 EDMONDSON CONSTRUCTION, CO. _ _ 350,00 115494 ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL 150.00 115495 ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER CO. 226.23 115496 ELSINORE VALLEY ARTS NETWORK _ 4,000.00 115497 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT _ 19,584.98 115498 ELSINORE VALLEY RENTALS 99.00 _ 115499 ENVIRONMENTAL & CHEMICAL CONSULTING 2,562.00 115500ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENTERPRISE 599.90 115501 _.. EWING 478.85 115502 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS _. __ 12800 115503 GOLDEN OFFICE TRAILERS, INC 16200 115504 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,252.69 115505 HARMSWORTH ASSOCIATES, INC 1,584.00 115506 HARRIS -& ASSOCIATES, INC. 564790 115507 HARTZOG & GRABILL, INC. 3,985.73 115508 HAZZARD BACKFLOW CO. _ 75.00 115509 HDL GOREN & CONE 595.00 _ 115510 HEMET FENCE COMPANY 1,250 00 115511 HEMET RUBBER STAMP & SIGN CO. 55.90 115512 HI -WAY SAFETY, INC. 2,948.23 115513 HOGLE-IRELAND, INC. _.. _ 7483.50 115514 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST _.3544.30 115515 INLAND EMPIRE LOCK & KEY _ 553.31 115516 INLAND URGENT CARE, MEDICAL CORP. 9000 115517 JOHNSON MACHINERY CO. 1,235.34 115518 KIMBALL MIDWEST _ _. __189806 115519 ARMINE KIRAKOSSIAN _ _ _.. __ 7300 115520KPA, LLC __. 55000 115521. _ L E M S.A.R _. _.. 21586.00 115522 LAKE BUICK PONTIAC GMC, INC. _. _ 295.62 115523 LAKE CHEVROLET _ 42676 115524 LAZY BOY FURNITURE GALLERIES _ 5593 12 115525 LE&SJWA 1000000 115526 LEE& STIRES, INC. _.... _.485411 115527 ALEJANDRO LEYTTE _._ _ _ _.... 158 00 115528 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES LLC 7,638.48 115529 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 49200. 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 3 OF Page 6 of 7 AUGUST 15, 2013 CI I Y OF LA IE ELSINOR E WARRANT LIST UI-{gUKit VENDOR NAML', AMOUNT 115530 MATTHEW FAGAN CONSULTING SERVICES _ 1,608.67 115531 MAXIMUM SIGN CO. _ 344.00 115532 MUNISERVICES, LLC 37500 115533 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS _ 614 58 115534 OFFICE MAX INCORPORATED 453.44 115535 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING, INC. ._1346800 115536 PACIFIC AGGREGATES 10444 115537 PARK WEST LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT 7,930.53 115538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT OF TEMECULA, INC. _ 1,067.50 115539 PORTACRAFT, INC. 1,445.44 115540 PREMIUM PALOMAR MT. SPRING WATER _ 173.50 115541 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 1,949.20 115542 -- PRODUCTION VIDEO, INC. __. _. 742.50 115543 QUILL CORPORATION _.. __. _. 376 115544 - RBI TRAFFIC _ 4,86000 115545 RICE CANYON ELEMENTARY_ _..... 50000 115546_ WENDY RICO 35.00.. 115547 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. 1,773.83 115548 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 76759946 115549 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION & LAND MANAGEMENT. 2742,82 115550 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF ASSESSOR _ _ 24.00 115551 ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ 11814 115552 ROBERTROONEY-- MATCOTOOLS _ 333.71 115553 STEPHANIE C. SANGES _ 1,410.00 115554 SCHOOL OUTFITTERS _.. _ 65790 115555. _. SHRED -IT. _ 160.00.. 115556 SIGNS BY TOMORROW _ 435.60 115557 SNAP ON TOOLS - OMAR MUNOZ 440 76 115558 SONSRAY MACHINERY, LLC _ 21581.64 115559 STAUFFER'S LAWN EQUIPMENT _ 101.57 115560.. STUDIO 395 _..... _... 90.00 115561 SUN PAC CONTAINERS _.. __. _ 320.00 115562 SUPERCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS _ 705.76 115563 TEAM AUTOAI D, INC. _._ 51353 115564 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SUPPLY 324.84 115565 TEMESCAL CANYON HIGH SCHOOL _ 15000 115566 THE BETTY MILLS COMPANY _ 1,943.49 115567 TUSCANY HILLS ELEMENTARY _ 13000 115568 TUSCANY HILLS LANDSCAPE & REC. CO. _ 4,715.28 115569 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 161.27 115570 VENUS PRINTING _ 259.20 115571 VILLAGE EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC _ 110.00 115572 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. _. 150560 115573 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVT'S 10,571.29 115574 X FACTOR MARINE & SPEED 260.00 WARRANT TOTAL 2,107,953.35 PAY DATE 08/01/13 CALIFORNIA P E R.S. 47,762.86 08/01/13 CALIFORNIA P E R.S. 118,602.67 08/01/13 PAYROLLCASH _ 128860.64 08/15/13 PAYROLLCASH 145457.79 08/01/13 PAYROLL TAXES 5391386 08/15/13 PAYROLL TAXES _ _6181591 07/31/13 WIRE TRANSFER -UNION BANK 409.65 GRAND TOTAL -- 2,664,776.73 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 4 OF Page 7 of 7 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF� i City Council 1:71 Redevelopment Agency F-1 Other DEPARTMENT:hDt41PJ6TePrr-LVe1 k �) Q-& nCONSENT: APPEAL _ BUSINESS: -. 1 4�--Ofc RESOLUTION: F-1 ORDINANCES F—] PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: �9 Report emailed to Clerk a ...... a a a a 0. a .. N a a .. ■■■ a M.• w a a a w a 0■■ a a■ a a a a a a a■■■■ a 0 a a■•■.■ a 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■ N a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 8.■ 0 0 a 0 a .. a 0 00■ a 0 a .. ■ a. 0 N 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 .. a 0. a a M. 0 a ... a. N 0 M 0 a. a a. a 1 Submitted by: 6, Date: - Approved by: Department He Finance Directs City Manager: Date: <� ` / 3 "- !� Date: Date: �(,�� CITY OF LADE � LSIRORE �Al DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT — JULY 2013 Recommendation Receive and file. Discussion The Investment Report is a listing of all funds invested for the City as of the date shown on the report. Prepared By: Nancy L. LasseyG � Finance Administrator Prepared By: James R. Riley Director of Admibistrative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Investment Report for July 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Page 1 of 23 Page 2 of 23 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS AS OF JULY 31, 2013 ACTIVE ACCOUNTS Bank of America - General Bank of America - Payroll Bank of America - Flex Benefit Total Active Accounts INVESTMENTS Local Agency Investment Fund CAMP Pool Account U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Federal Agency Bond / Notes Corporate Notes Sub -total Investments Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31(LAIF) Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (Other) Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (Total) Total Investments Cashier Drawers #1 & #2 City of Lake Elsinore Petty Cash Fund TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANG. BOOK BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE $2,241,716.16 102,753.80 (1,676,585.53) 667,884.43 160,016.85 - (92.28) 159,924.57 22,058.61 - 14,217,100.84 22,058.61 2,423,791.62 102,753.80 (1676,677.81) 849,867.61 8,888,038.31 - - 8,888,038.31 295,077.11 - - 295,077.11 5,988,614.25 - - 5,988,614.25 14,217,100.84 - - 14,217,100.84 8,346,822.80 8,346,822.80 37,735,653.31 - - 37,735,653.31 11,909.14 - - 11,909.14 331,653.75 - - 331,653.75 343,562.89 343,562.89 38,079,216.20 - - 38,079,216.20 40,503,007.82 102,753.80(1676677.81) 38,929,083.81 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on December 11, 2012. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. James R Riley August 13, 2013 Director of Administrative Services Date Prepared by. N. Lassey, Finance Administrator Page 3 of 23 300.00 1,000.00 38,930,383.81 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND TRANSACTION SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2013 Interest Rate Purchase Date 0.267% Daily Beginning Balance Net Increase/(Decrease) $ 8,884,938.64 $ 3,099.67 Maturity Rate 24 -Hour Ending Balance Page 4 of 23 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF JULY 31, 2013 FUND NO FUND NAME 100 General Fund 101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 102 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Fund 103 Office of Traffic Safety Fund 104 Traffic Offender Fund 105 Misc. General Project Fund 106 Affordable Housing In Lieu Fund 107 Developer Agreement Revenue 108 Misc. Grant Fund 110 State Gas Tax Fund 111 TUMF C.I.P. Fund 112 Transportation Fund 113 Measure A Fund 114 SB1186 CAS Program Fund 115 Traffic Safety Fund 116 City Hall -Public Works DIF Fund 117 Community Center DIF Fund 118 Lake Side Facility DIF Fund 119 Animal Shelter DIF Fund 120 Camino Del Norte DIF 130 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Fund - City-wide 135 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Fund - Dist. No. 1 140 Geothermal Fund 150 C.D.B.G.Fund 155 GSA152 -- N.P.D.E.S. 160 PEG Grant Fund 201 Street C. I. P. Fund 204 Signal C.I.P. Fund 205 Traffic Impact Fee Fund 211 Storm Drain C.I.P. Fund 221 Park C.I.P. Fund 231 Library C.I.P. Fund 232 City Fire Protection Fund 235 2011 Series A Bonds -Boat Launch Construction Fund 254 AD 89-1 Railroad Canyon Rd. Improvement Fund 259 CFD 90-3 Construction Fund 266 CFD 2004-1 Marintiqu 272 CFD 2005-2 CIP Fund 351 AD 87-2 Debt Service Fund 352 AD 86-1 Debt Service Fund 353 AD 89-1 Debt Service Fund 354 CFD 90-2 Successor RDA 356 AD 90-1 Debt Service Fund 357 CFD 2003-2 Canyon Hills 358 CFD 91-2 Debt Service Fund 360 AD 93-1 Debt Service Fund 365 CFD 98-1 Summerhill Improvement fund 366 CFD 2004-1 Debt Service Fund Pooled Cash and Investments by Fund 1 of 2 AMOUNT 13,202,569.29 8,463.58 829.85 (13,477.13) 100,965.48 1,322,432.35 1,531,269.71 349,140.35 (181,805.44) 1,050,515.23 581,360.15 775,868.26 40, 846.51 950.18 (13,272.10) 1,298,410.17 204,885.68 547,090.72 72, 532.02 36,018.92 (64,487.51) 255,635.14 19,513.60 83,482.79 (20, 527.61) 157,629.76 14,051.89 152, 595.48 2,993,743.91 5,557,451.78 348,185.18 1,528,991.35 53,532.99 29,101.11 126,253.15 21.77 1,055.21 920.68 49, 839.46 72, 094.50 110,906.54 7,844.12 1,273.31 51,605.52 2,230.52 865.42 88,649.41 2,616.44 Page 5 of 23 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF JULY 31, 2013 FUND NO FUND NAME 367 CFD 2005-3 Summerly / Laing 368 CFD 2004-2 Vista Lago 369 CFD 2004-3 Rosetta Canyon 370 CFD 2005-x Camino Del Norte 371 CFD 2005-1 Serenity 372 CFD 2005-3 Alberhill Ranch 373 CFD 2005-5 Wasson Canyon 374 CFD 2005-4 Lakeview Villas 375 CFD 2005-1 D. Clurman 376 CFD 2006-3 La Strada 377 CFD 2006-X Tessara 378 CFD 2007-X TR#31957 379 CFD 2007-X Marina Village 380 CFD 2006-9 Tuscany W 381 CFD 2006-10 River LK 382 CFD 2006-9 Trieste 383 CFD 2007-X Canyon Hills 384 CFD 2003-2 SRS 2006A 385 CFD 2004-3 SRS 2006A 386 CFD 2007-4 Mekenna 387 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite 388 CFD 2007-6 Holiday 389 CFD 88-3 Series 2008 390 CFD 2003-2 Improvement Area C 393 AD 93-1 Debt Service Fund 394 CFD 2005-5 SRS 2012A 604 Endowment Trust Fund 605 Public Improvement Trust Fund 606 Mobile Source Air Polution Fund 608 Trust Deposit & Pre Paid Expense 611 Developer Agreement Trust Fund 616 Fire Station Trust Fund 617 Housing Fund SA RDA 620 Cost Recovery System Fund 631 Lake Destrat Equipment Replacement Fund 650 CFD 2003-1 Law & Fire Service Fund 651 CFD 2006-5 Park, OpnSpc 652 CFD 2007-1 Law & Fire 653 CFD 2009-1 Parks/Lighting Total Pooled Cash & Investments Pooled Cash and Investments by Fund 2of2 AMOUNT 9,478.66 85,208.20 21,827.43 4,528.56 63, 821.68 228, 957.20 58, 970.48 41,494.58 13,606.78 27, 950.83 22, 946.46 43,309.28 448.07 528.18 3,058.06 41,290.76 4,545.58 32, 878.57 7.51 5,795.27 28,219.31 3,749.27 106,913.40 1,217.42 63.89 714.31 10,827.79 854,971.96 204, 978.56 1,193, 836.61 1,200,310.00 19.94 438,821.51 857,377.67 75,979.71 542,070.14 24,359.42 5,120.47 129,510.60 38,930,383.81 Page 6 of 23 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2013 TYPES OF SECURITIES U.S. Treasury Bills U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes Federal Agency Bond / Notes Banker's Acceptances Certificates of Deposit Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Commercial Paper Medium Term Corporate Notes Repurchase Agreements DIVERSIFICATION MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE 0.00% UNLIMITED 15.87% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 5,988,614.25 37.68% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 14,217,100.84 0.00% 40.00% 0.00% 25.00% 0.00% 30.00% 0.00% 15.00% 22.12% 30.00% Current Balance $ 8,346,822.80 0.00% UNLIMITED Reverse Repurchase Agreements LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) Current Balance CAMP -Pooled Sweep Account Current Balance TOTAL 0.00% 20.00% 23.55% UNLIMITED $ 8,888,038.31 0.78% UNLIMITED $ 295,077.11 100.00% $ 37,735,653.31 Note: Local agencies are only eligible to purchase medium term corporate notes that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation (S & P). If a security falls below "A" by both rating agencies, then PFM Asset Management LLC will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. The CAMP Portfolio Summary and Statistics shows the credit quality held by the City's investments. *No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies. Page 7 of 23 1 Y � E E m a u V M O O O tD CO O O I m.+rn N 0 � o 6 Q f Ro1 Page 8 of 23 M P7 Page 9 of 23 0 0 0 o p o o N '1 h O O O Itl P n � � OI m tlF pMj � p C Ifl IVO .-i rvi Oyi � O Oi IIf h ti v M N N N � H /R oC u u Q E 0 C 17 y 9 c O 0 m .>+ > mb y A W �+ cci\T-- G v m E p � Q, rn •a a c s 2 .�'�^ O 0 o in of co rn o o rn v m rn � O O W O n H O O C\ 1p O O� M O O I� O N u? C0 O O O oc h O lc M lc M 'r M m .ti Ol M V Oi M N .�-1 O O N v ti 7 N N .✓ v N kF VT Ol � Ol O N V O O vl O N a) ltt M M N V d' M N � m aa' m m C C BVI .a lT O m a V V ~ b rnrnz O V N M U o h N 0 n C m N 9Ea a v bn n � CTS 16 K> c (Uh on G In > m V Ol N W u m o E f d E N � Q Q O N F N U O D m 10 o O c J m ami p` K t N QCp Q V U j 'G O� ,vy n rn a � Z `% U- o o 2 v Uy a I r_ep. •� �p E Cyy v o d yv P: a � � d` lg [yO 21 o �E v O � O n� V o .-5 a h wwaaa w w w F Page 9 of 23 a C W V N O O ON 0 W N O `ico O le N M 4 M p 0 O O n O0 FA Page 10 of 23 O j v rN+i rn 4 M p p ON N n Np N W � Obi O p N v H 06- n f N N N 0 00 n N O 0 0 > O O o 0 O p ` of a W O O YO1 I!f N eF Uj ef' W H H er N N N O O n O0 FA Page 10 of 23 cq N M h .i: C O� V' 01 d' M O? CO [i' vl OJ V O n O' OJ N lO M N N y t. V. t. rl O W V O M f. OV. O� lV O� th fh . V ' tp d" Ili tp .i dM (p� .-i N In t0 .4 M W�� P N N ILn N OMi ONi M N v1 ti O h M N OJ �O d'' fG' W 1l5 m vt' NO' z Y 0 r p ° z < W�y °V ° ° .zr O a'° U� oz °zy W a��ww zca7N p¢Q� z Ow°�a LDZS�Oo°�om� m¢ammiiU°u LLLLc 0 O O O N 0 F Page I I of 23 a V•l 0.] v D E a 2� Q H E o F V i N N U m Lq M V N m N M N H H .Mi M M tY M O M 1� d �p of F O m N N OM W � T LQ O N P CRN V N W N M S w N W LQ O b VY M ti b In ry O b N ro m Lq M V N m N M N H H .Mi M M tY M O M 1� d �p of F O M N N N IV m Lq M V N m N M m m m m m m Nm o+ m m m m rn rn 0 0 o a o 0 0 ti M M M M M PM WN W O Po^ W H 0 6 W b FZ Z o z O ZO Oti Z Z M OZ M Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o M .i N H H .Mi M M M � N M M T uN T vi n P o o �p of F O M N N N IV N M S w N W m M O b VY M ti b In vt O b d ro N tfM1 N n 0 N Q-9 Cl n W p� 1p 06 o n m m LQ m 1� N v IJ1 O V M I H O O N Om m m m m m m Nm o+ m m m m rn rn 0 0 o a o 0 0 ti M M M M M PM WN W O Po^ W H 0 6 W b FZ Z o z O ZO Oti Z Z M OZ M Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o M .i N H H .Mi M M M � N M M T uN T vi n P o o �p of F O M N N N IV N Op S w n � m M d Vl b VY M ti b In N m M uMi ro h m b d Y' O O O 4 O m O Q-9 Cl n d Q wf p� 1p In pi n M O N O O Om O O O m N Om 4 0 , Q Q 4 4 Q Q ¢ o o LL O O O Page 12 of 23 0 o g 0 0 0 0 O q O O O O O S o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ..1 �ryp N m m m m m m m m Nm o+ m m m m rn rn 0 0 o a o 0 0 ti M M M M M PM WN W O Po^ W H 0 6 W b FZ Z o z O ZO Oti Z Z M OZ M Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o Y o M .i N H H .Mi M M M � N M M T uN T vi n P o o �p of F O M N N N IV N Op S w n � M N N H H .Mi M M M � N M M T uN T vi n P o o H .-i M W 111 vi N N p1 N Op S w n � m M d Vl b VY M ti b In N m M uMi ro h m b d Y' O O O 4 O m O Q-9 Cl n d Q wf M N N H H .Mi M M M M M M Op S w Oo .Ni b � Of N z � � ON Oo Z h O I� d Y' O O O 4 O m O Q-9 Cl n d Q wf N O N Z f+1 H N N ti F m N 0 4 0 , U p of Q LL o o LL O O O Page 12 of 23 O N M O O O O O �ryp m m N 0 0 8 INn 0 S O 0 S p 0 S O 0 S Ul 0 o V1 N M N N H H .Mi M M M M M M �y F-+ 0 0 o O o Z z � � ON Oo Z ~ O I� d Y' O O O 4 O m O Q-9 Cl n d Q wf N O N Z f+1 OO m O F m N 0 4 0 , U p of Q LL LL 0 LL O W� O Page 12 of 23 �y F-+ Lt WA Y Igi, VI g r` voi V1 m Ill o I�il Oq vro ^ V1 S o M 16 16 -M+ ti O� rQ IT: b .6 O FO N ti (V ti M 4 I/1 O N OJ x FO N O+ (V V1 M 4 I/1 O N OJ M O .0 U Vl m tiW 00+ Ol V O N ryl b C N M I� O V S S .6 S S N N O O C� T IOn E O tll h O Ol d- N N W h vl CO W O W V M IO Q LIl Vl ti O In OO O ID V r. V O V IO O OJ O IfI W OI ti N �D O 4) Ol vt v1 lD 11 N W S M V M •VI Iq W M p � � � vl � z p z a Oi l0 )O E I',`', w N O N N O 4 cq Q O, Q M x FO N O 10 h M ti I/1 d' N OJ M V1 Vi m V' vl LL1 n 00+ ool rn � N l4MJ ^ � m {J S S M S S M N O O N O IOn O O (' N LIl Vl Oi O In OO O ID V r. V O � a P O N Vl O CO I'� O lD IO W S M V M •VI Iq W M p ge 13 of 23 0 IY N O M H N ti ti H � O M N Vi m V' vl LL1 n 00+ ool rn � N l4MJ ^ � m {J M M M M M M M M M M M M Vl I!l Ill M In Vl V1 ID 1� r. OJ OJ � N � CO I'� O lD IO W O CO N •VI p � � � � � z p z a 0 Z ` ? E I',`', I°`l°l �°`R O 4 cq Q O, N N N S p z O Z O Z O O O O SS O L ry o 0 O o O ci O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0C3 0 00 TV E . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d vi vi o ui o 0 ge 13 of 23 0 N W Q Q O q O Vi m V' vl LL1 n 00+ ool rn � N l4MJ ^ � m {J M M M M M M M M M M M M Vl I!l Ill M In Vl V1 ID 1� r. OJ OJ � O 1 CO I'� O lD IO W O CO N •VI p � � � � � z p z a 0 Z ` ? I',`', I°`l°l �°`R O 4 cq Q O, N N N O O O z O Z O Z O ti W S O ^ i O TV E . z� LL O z� LL E z� LL 0 a� LL E IL LL D LL O LL D ge 13 of 23 0 L .1L 'J M vM1 N N N ti ti b M r W W d LQ V' � Q I� N b N ✓� V' b M M n M � N � t+l N O b c N �j M 01 N O Yt 4 M ti �N O OJ O+ a E f� N l0 N Vf V �O ✓1 M f� M N Q Q M M M W ry N yW W O1 ti N N 'N,' N � O C5 q opbO O 14 14 O 6 po P S W O M - S n o n P m m m o o m O ((vv�� V Ol O1 1(1 1D O� Ifl IA N � H 1� MN �O N I(t V �O vl M Iry� M N 10 No N N ti N N � ti � N O O O Q� yy eNi ri N n N N .N-1 .Ni H .N -i H eN-I .Ni .-1 N fpT � E m S 6 S S S S S S S S $ S $ d o 5 g o g o g 666666666 o o o S o yr o o in n o n vi o W O g g o O Z O O F+ O O O N O q m O q O O O O N N J N N r N N Z N F N O N N N O N p N N 0 \ t0 �D p, N Q N O p 1!1 J N �O 'J Vf J 11t W Z N N K H ti N d � p � 0 o wo es° a° Ge °dpo S oo uo r= �o ze O�K� Uzi n a o voi S � py \yy uoi a3 ro m20: O "a, u rn 3 v$, H m o ^' (ley G O O U q O U O D O O O O O } O O O J O A oC O_ N Q N 'S` H W N LL N�. N K O ti Z O 0. � Np Z O O O w y Q O N O O OV' Ou q a izl o� Page 14 of 23 lS `` N vi W W N O IR O 00 N W ^ n N rn E u M N H V OM ? H N O N Q M M N N W N N w 01 TL' ry ^N,I y r� rn o m o o m N t4 o F U H o 0 C NI Y14H H H O G S� � ry o m vOi S N N ^ n eN1 'm G m v m o m uMi o �c O u m ry ti v H N m a M In N W � N N w O O N � � a rn E N 6 O O S O O O O O O cs 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' M Vl M N N N a � N N W N � O L � z C O C Qmo m.s�i O o Fo ar`ti j4 a6 o O O o Z o o z o ��' b u Q N v N O O V 0 0 0 h N .b iD C f Page 15 of 23 00 Cy to 5i'i FIN 1J 7. N MO M ,p Wm V H N N ti O N N V1 M O N O M r y O O OO O O O O O O O O O O OO Y N 0�� M b A .'1 ,O T P � W y, m b Lq u�i m m V O o o � � V OOiDD v chi N N m m n a, N o o m C 7 rj Tjoj n M b q Iq OJ O q O T N fV OO O Vi vl W O b c O C a Ul O) 4� V VPi N S S n N N OM O S OI O L J, pJ O N n O V1 M V In O, O 1Ct !V 1 C O h M O R M O O� } A ; T V1 O OJ N OR d� lD O, 10 1l n LQ ,O ,OO I!1 n N VI O V1 M {� U1 n O M N N VI n N N N y O O M O V D) V W N Vl h N � N l0 m n 1 DJ D cq O n N of 01 � 4 E N .Mi � p n � m m m S u F F S S S S S S g o S S S 0 0 S S o 0 P 0 $ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o d o 0 o c o 0 o P o 0 0 0 4 O V vl N O O vl O N �/1 d n b OO O vl Vl n N Vt O w) M n V1 n O M N N Vl n ry Oi N i dZ n x JO H �J Z 0 d' D Q N aa pp O I/f N N N N N N M M M M M M N M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y p e O o O o O YI U� N Ul V1 1� vl N r!V� L'IO W n bNO 0O VO Mn VOI Z 'y Z � Z � 1 Z � lVW-I O 1 Z O 0 Z IWM p ZM-I � �` O 0 J O •i (.� '� U' 'J O v O. 10 T p r o r d r P N r o N r o N rN-, r o N Y o�V ww N m � N Q N Q N .N-, LLf N .N-, r p.' = 2' C C[ p' p' 2' p \ � m [V OJ,� LL LL LL q Vl q q q U> D N li LL iii. Page 16 of 23 7. M m �m,I m S 4 L w 2 O V S W LLWLL ^ m U a f0 g a o o s s o 0 o s V O O O O O In O O vl O O N O O In O O N O O w O O V O P O 10 ti V F� N O ti IC O W O M b O 1p O� LL 1J LL � LL O lZL 141 � IaL LQL LL� LL LL L n A ID m w w b � v V ti C M O }yrs l O M In LP a m H p1 O M N O Ol N Iq m vMvl N N O INS b N N p o m m rn o N �3 N N N N N fV M V V V I'1 7 ^ Imli Vml Im lO m m rn rn m rn 'Y o 0 0 o � M �lNpO N Obl O M C 4Al �v m Oi �y ZZ Z I/Wl �1 v O N C O P M N cl� IQ Iq W �e g x �u�u roiOC�oN �r � Y Page 17 of 23 W L Q! Y _ LLUr O t!1 N O O W O ti C' O+ L V) U a C Q W t Y L cR L L m Y. i.+ C 7 u a w 01 m C m J o 0 0 o P o G o w o IPl� ll) M h M lD OJ 9 N M c O (Q O m �m,I m S 4 L w 2 O V S W LLWLL ^ m U a f0 g a o o s s o 0 o s V O O O O O In O O vl O O N O O In O O N O O w O O V O P O 10 ti V F� N O ti IC O W O M b O 1p O� LL 1J LL � LL O lZL 141 � IaL LQL LL� LL LL L n ID m w w b � v V l O M In LP a m H p1 O M N O Ol N Iq m vMvl N N O INS b N N o m m rn o N a W M n O O O O O y � ^ Imli Vml Im lO m m rn rn m rn 'Y o 0 0 o � M �lNpO N Obl O M i 4Al �v Z q O J O O O Q N ZZ Z I/Wl �1 v .0 m Z �e g x �u�u roiOC�oN �r (Q O m �m,I m S 4 L w 2 O V S W LLWLL ^ m U a f0 g a o o s s o 0 o s V O O O O O In O O vl O O N O O In O O N O O w O O V O P O 10 ti V F� N O ti ti W O M b O � � � iU � LL 1J LL � LL O lZL 141 � IaL LQL LL� LL LL L n W 4w 4m 4m U l4MJ l09 W oV' l07 N m M q M b N M N � .Mi .Mi Mi M-� .Ma ti M -i Mi N rMi U M M M M M M M M M M In m �m,I m O v a f O b 10 10 O W1 Ol NM I1-iltt N 01 c Q N N N N N a O z 0 a O o Z Ill Z p Z jn J O Z yl Z v N o V O vl 1� lO Vl M 4 W 4] O Q W a tt 10 10 Q M < t(1FL 1i ei O O O O Q N N N Q M N N N N N O Ou cq- `JQw �uyT gj V F� N O N Op N .M-� E NN o bi E v N W O M b O � � � iU � LL 1J LL � LL O lZL 141 � IaL LQL LL� LL LL L In m �m,I m O v a O NM I1-iltt N 01 � O ry N N N N N M N b 1i ei tail h n N J N N N N N O Ou Q W N W O M b O � N ` n ID m w w b � v V l O M In LP a m H p1 O M N O Ol N Iq m vMvl N N O INS b N N o m m rn o N a o S o S o 0 O O O O Q SO O v N b v rn b � M �lNpO N Obl O M I� V OJ 4Al �v Z q O J O O O Q N ZZ Z I/Wl �1 v .0 m > o�M� N�M. VVVVu mi �e g x �u�u roiOC�oN �r Page 17 of 23 INF m a o� ay.+ L E L m LL C 7 Q 4! m c m z� W IJP W N M W I/1 V1 OI O N b r-� w 1F." N � ti T I � In V O O M IO I � V' OpJ P �aWpy OI O� W O h M Op m ti y pf V M IO vt W N N M M tMl1 b W �D W Z ° Y } 44 a a > z t' } J z S Cf y IQ 1h11 W N N M M IM/1 pp 61 C nd g g S g g g g g g g $ S o g N d O d O o O d O d 6 o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O p O d O d O y W ° "; �qy u N h aOO�J �O ti aNyF �O rV'� h O Sh�pp adM}' C � a (7 V1 N O� N M N N V01 h M N ti IIq M IO O� �QI N N C V m O �O W W W OJ M lJfV ID rl h h W eW� O h N V' N hl O IC W IC y N p� N N ti N N M O V1 O l� n r'j N O �V�yy y ap Vl M r+ M N N N M N I/1 N tl' H W IJP W N M W I/1 V1 OI O vl LQ N b r-� Ill d 6 N mC S Y V O O M IO f V' OpJ P �aWpy OI O� W O h M m ti YY� Y ° � Z y } 44 a a > z t' } J z S nd g g S g g g g g g g $ S o g d O d O o O d O d 6 o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O p O d O d O y 0 0 0 0 0 o P m o p Z o Z p P1/�; 0 o c R N Z N N Q N N N O ` N N q J N q g \ 0 g 1 N 0 ON .Ni ti N (A N_ l"J O l.7 O O m O m ti FFz O p O owr i �� .N. o0i � �o Zov{o zc as ly�o zo o ori >°me quo Fra p U O NOu M�rhj 3 e w mo $ 80,4R , p,mOo�$ .4 .4 o o N U. N N VI N C a C' �u �u C co N C rn 8 N q C ca Ou r 'flN •�• F -o .�"+�d aCZ o z o�MOoa p C 3o3o3omzoaoMo�izouzo..omo3ofo�iado�c Eu Page 18 of I i I 23 !lj I/1 $ O O ON (/QMH N r-� WqO d 6 N mC S Y V O O M IO N V' OpJ P �aWpy OI O� W O h M m U � 0 0 0 0 0 o P m o p Z o Z p P1/�; 0 o c R N Z N N Q N N N O ` N N q J N q g \ 0 g 1 N 0 ON .Ni ti N (A N_ l"J O l.7 O O m O m ti FFz O p O owr i �� .N. o0i � �o Zov{o zc as ly�o zo o ori >°me quo Fra p U O NOu M�rhj 3 e w mo $ 80,4R , p,mOo�$ .4 .4 o o N U. N N VI N C a C' �u �u C co N C rn 8 N q C ca Ou r 'flN •�• F -o .�"+�d aCZ o z o�MOoa p C 3o3o3omzoaoMo�izouzo..omo3ofo�iado�c Eu Page 18 of I i I 23 O 0 b 5 k� 0 0 0 0 0 N e- ' O O ru 4 t Page 19 of 23 0, r� y h O M v � M O N N O M p v N N c p �a s a J � N P N V d. W 10 O y� N O N lel lh l!1 M n N O1 O O� CO W O n � n h N O O O O O P IOh O h N V01 O O � V 9 0 o p vi o o n o m n o O O �n V N V1 h n N O� W N V1 O V1 M m ri O V OJ N ti � MI U C Q M n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C v ti Ob 4 O O O o o c9i o O o $ o p o O OO 0 0 G O o O O O 0 0 0 o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 o O S P o � V1 h Vf y O N 4 n G O n h IA O N V ul O O �/t n N o 0 n OO O h a O ni ri .i E m 8 a z f z O � M M o M in M m m rn m ,p io � •n � in V in in ti o in i H �n O O I'' = N J Q O O O N_. N N O O O O O O N N ` � N J C p v o O O O O O o a o O o W o 0 0 o o a o M o o •C 6 Q N p, li y Q O . (((U Q OM W O N N M M O N .y � 10 N lJ ti of M U o , n Y O J PO O Z� Z O� Z Oti Z lJ N-1 l-+ LQypili %• -f J N (fi N J N rjj N f0 �V .-1 ` � N p' N p' N � N C[ � J ^may •i p W .N -i LL n n O 0� z ti O u'S ro m o u 6 N ? d G O O h h O d 6 O O O O C p yC � ryO� / q .Mi H pyV H .Mi H .`M-1 ryO� .M -I .MI .-i ti N •4 h h P O h O O P 4 n O O O O O h O Page 20 of 23 s �? I m 1 5 N � o r- 0 v$i V) 4 L a % in in ro � o�g5 V O N O .p CJ o m C v E a � � m pcic a w J O n � 9 m N n m N U W H L s �? I m 1 5 N ( I N M N N ,nz u o ro � o�g5 N �Nyc N ,nz u o ro � o�g5 o v � m pcic a w y Y F N H I Q N H L c /V O g g Ln H ao m c+ Ln �: O OR QQ�11 to 1- o; g C; U4J 0 0 in A N N m c Z'' 7 � V LL` u � m D W, N a N G1 , W' c M W= N �Nyc �o ,nz u V a o�g5 � o v c A3y3+ � m pcic a w F N � o 0 0 .b Page 21 of 23 5 w �E } —0 � •-I .i M M M M m N 9 Q � N N N N N N N N N N Ln tr1 0 N V1 eY CO M W DO O �Op W W 4 O O N N N N trl N r t` Cn V1 V1 M N f� O iD (lei Vml O O � 000 WLNI) M C I -L V Dn�pp r-, n N V� cri M M 0Np Q1 N vOi u01 t0D n N M N N � V d0' V' N N N N N � � OJ eJ 1� N N N N N N N N N to N n N N N N N O O N O O O 4 H W O O G7 O 1`t O m O O O O Vf lf) O V O O O O N N O Ln V O N O I� O W O N h Ill Vl M N O O W M O 1� m M N OJ N W W ti W N N N N � O C ' n M W 07 u1 M M N V tD N N S W H lM ti LD o O O O O O o o O o O O o O O O o O O o 0 O O O OC) O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O e4 r-1 H •'i �"1 •-1 r1 H rl .1 e-1 r-1 rl t'4 ei .-I N •-1 r -V rl N V, v 8 8 S S S S L° U� M O O O L 9 O O i O O J J J J J J J J > J J J � N x uuuuu uuEuuu v M L a a a c M M M M M M M M M M m m M M M M M M M M M E� N �-I e4 ei N r-1 r-1 • i r-1 'i •"I rl H •-1 rl {I rl N rl e4 N N Q O 4 H ry H ti N N N N N N N N N N N M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y C ryA d p�Of r\i O� N N N N ll lit t� P O`i OL O� Q� IAC N N N N M M M ~� G o O O o O o 0 o O o 0 o O O o 010 o O o 0 4 O Page 22 of 23 8 gni O j L'+ O O O O o O 9 jp (y G c S C S C i"a C S •C E C fi c ' E S 4 N •G W S V, v 8 8 S S S S L° U� M O O O L 9 O O i O O J J J J J J J J > J J J � N x uuuuu uuEuuu v M L a a a c M M M M M M M M M M m m M M M M M M M M M E� N �-I e4 ei N r-1 r-1 • i r-1 'i •"I rl H •-1 rl {I rl N rl e4 N N Q O 4 H ry H ti N N N N N N N N N N N M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y C ryA d p�Of r\i O� N N N N ll lit t� P O`i OL O� Q� IAC N N N N M M M ~� G o O O o O o 0 o O o 0 o O O o 010 o O o 0 4 O Page 22 of 23 O ^ � OD O+ N � N V m m O O O IA N ii n 7' OOi O N O n N O oc� W p Q ? O O L O ^ � OD O+ N � N V m m O O O IA N ii n 7' Page 23 of 23 I LW OOi O N O n N O oc� W p v N m � s U V yah C � y q L a m m t e �C E � Q�y� g o a' C U U u Page 23 of 23 I LW AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF City Council Redevelopment Agency F-1 Other DEPARTMENT: /V97L, -- E� CONSENT: F1 APPEAL _ BUSINESS: RESOLUTION: E] ORDINANCES F-1 PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS:'moi -t' \(tuN�-f Report emailed to Clem s a a a a a a a a a z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a z a a a a a z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z a a a 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: a a a a a a a a a a z a 0 a z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I Submitted by: Approved by: Date: Department Head: Date: Finance Director: Date: g / City Manager: Date: kl-)- I CITY Of LADE LSIIYOBJE �M DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARDS ELM STREET PROJECT NO. 4385-2 Recommendations 1. Award the construction of Elm Street to Marathon General, Inc., in the amount of $208,665.00 with a 10% contingency of $20,800 to be used for construction. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with Marathon General, Inc. 3. Award the Construction Geotechnical and Materials testing Services to GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc., in the amount of $18,640.00 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. 5. Award the Construction Survey Services to TKE Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $9,480.00 6. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with TKE Engineering, Inc. Background As a condition of approval for the Vista Del Lago/Broadstone Riversedge project, D.R. Horton constructed a portion of Elm Street, starting where it intersects with Lakeshore Drive and proceeding 290 feet westerly towards the lake, leaving the remaining portion of Elm Street unimproved. To preserve the integrity of the AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 Page I of 72 Award Construction Contracts August 27, 2013 Page 2 of 3 existing improvements and address the issues that go along with a partially improved street, Council directed staff to complete the paving of Elm Street. Elm Street paving is phase II of the CIP project which included the paving of Diamond Circle that was completed earlier this calendar year. The Elm Street design was completed at the end of June; put out to bid in July, with the bid opening scheduled for early August. Discussion The bids were opened publicly on August 8, 2013 of 2:00 p.m. The City received 10 bids from qualified contractors and they are as follows: 1. Marathon General, Inc. Escondido $208,665.00 2. Vance Corporation Rialto $209,805.00 3. S.C. Services, Inc. Lakeside $219,350.00 4. Lee and Stires, Inc. Ontario $221,414.95 5. Landmark Site Contractors Corona $229,748.10 6. Hillcrest Contracting Corona $231,118.00 7. R.J. Noble Orange $254,153.00 8. All American Asphalt Corona $270,000.00 9. NPG Corporation Perris $281,398.25 10. Hardy & Harper, Inc. Santa Ana $288,000.00 The low bid, Marathon General, Inc. came in $125,265 under the engineer's estimate of $333,930. Concurrent to the construction bid, requests for qualifications and proposal for geotechnical construction services were sent to five select consultants. Staff is recommending the City enter into a professional services agreement with GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. Staff also requested proposals for construction survey were also sent to three select consultants and is recommending the City enter into a professional services contract with TKE Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 72 Award Construction Contracts August 27, 2013 Page 3of3 Fiscal Impact The Elm Street project budget is $333,930 and is fully funded through AQMD and Fund 105, General/Miscellaneous. Estimated Project Budget: Marathon General, Inc. $208,665.00 Construction Contingency $ 20,800.00 GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. $ 18,640.00 TKE Engineering, Inc. $ 10,125.00 Inspection and Contract Administration $ 20,000.00 $278,230.00 Prepared by: Peter Ramey OL, Project Manager Rita Thompson Senior Engineering Technician Ken A. Seumalo Director of Public Works Approved by James Riley (4--� Director of Ad inistrative Services Department Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachments: Vicinity Map Agreement for Construction Services Agreement for Geotechnical Construction Services Agreement for Construction Survey Services Page 3 of 72 Page 4 of 72 A&Tt Page 6 of 72 Agreement No. AGREEMENT PROJECT NO. 4385-2 ELM STREET PAVING This Contract Agreement, made and entered into as of the date signed by the Mayor, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation, County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter called the "City" and Marathon General, Inc. hereinafter called the "Contractor." That the City and the Contractor for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows: 1. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract documents as if set forth in full herein, to wit, the Contract Agreement, any and all Contract Change Orders issued after the execution of the Contract Agreement, Addenda No(s). 0 issued prior to the opening of the Bids, the Special Provisions (which includes the General Provisions and Technical Provisions), the Project Plans, the Standard Plans, the Standard Specification, reference Specifications, the Bidder's Proposal, the Notice Inviting Bids, the Non -Collusion Affidavit, the Faithful Performance Bond, the Labor and Materials Payment Bond and insurance, all of which are essential parts of this Contract and made a part of this Contract Agreement. In the event of any conflict in the provisions thereof, the terms of said Contract documents as set forth above shall control, each over the other, in the order provided. 2. The Contractor shall furnish all materials, tools, equipment and labor, except as otherwise provided in the Plans or Special Provisions, and will perform all the work which is necessary to complete in a good, workmanlike and substantial manner the above said project in accordance with the Contract documents for this project, the Contract documents which are hereby specifically referred to and by such reference made a part hereof. 3. The City will pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for the work required under the bid items awarded by the City, to wit, the Base Bid Item(s) and Additive Bid Item(s) in the sum total amount of $ 208,665.00 subject to additions or reductions of the quantities of the various bid items at the unit prices bid, for furnishing all materials and for doing all the work contemplated and embraced under this Contract Agreement; for all loss or damages arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work, until the work is accepted by the City Council; for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work; and for well and faithfully completing the work, the whole thereof, in the manner and in accordance with the Contract documents therefore and the requirements of the Engineer under them. 4. The Contractor hereby agrees to commence work pursuant to this Contract within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of authorization specified in the Notice to Proceed. The Contractor agrees to diligently prosecute the contracted work, including corrective items of work, day to day thereafter, to completion, within Thirty (30) working days after said date in the "Notice to Proceed with Construction," except as adjusted by subsequent Contract Change Order(s). 5. The City and Contractor hereby agree that in case all construction called for under the Contract is not completed within the time hereinabove specified, including City caused delays or extensions, damages will be sustained by the City and that, it is and will be impracticable or extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual amount of damages the City will sustain in the event of, and by reason of, such delay. It is, therefore, agreed that such damages shall be presumed to be in the amount of $250.00 per calendar day, Page 7 of 72 and that the Contractor will pay to the City, or City may retain from amounts otherwise payable to Contractor, said amount for each calendar day by which the Contractor fails to complete the work, including corrective items of work, under this Contract Agreement within the time hereinabove specified and as adjusted by Contract Change Order(s). The Contractor will not be assessed liquidated damages fordelay(s) occasioned by the failure of the City or of the owner of a utility to provide for the removal or relocation of utility facilities. 6. The Contractor shall name as additional insured, the City of Lake Elsinore, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (RDA), Riverside County, California Department of Transportation, and shall furnish the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing liability insurance policy or policies which shall provide coverage for owned and non -owned automobiles; manufacturers and Contractor's liability; broad form property damage in any case where the Contractor has any property belonging to the City in his care, custody or control; owners and Contractor's protective liability; blanket contractual liability; products and completed operations coverage; coverage for collapse, explosion, and where any excavation, digging or trenching is done with power equipment; and shall bear an endorsement containing the following Provisions: Solely as respect to work done by or on behalf of the named insured for the City of Lake Elsinore, it is agreed that the City of Lake Elsinore, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (RDA), Riverside County, California Department of Transportation, its officers, employees and agents, are added as additional insured under this policy and the coverage provided hereunder shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Lake Elsinore, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, and the County of Riverside, its officers, employees and agents; under any third party liability policy. It is further agreed that the other insurance provision(s) of the policy are amended to conform therewith. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. Insurance companies providing insurance here under shall be rated (A minus: VII -Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct insurance business in the State of California. The terms of the insurance policy or policies issued to provide the below insurance coverage(s) shall not be amended or canceled by the carrier without thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail of amendments or cancellation to the City, except that cancellation for non-payment of premium shall require (10) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail. In the event the said insurance is canceled, the Contractor shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit to the City Clerk new evidence of insurance in the amounts established. All liability insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or shall have an attached riderwhich provides that the City of Lake Elsinore will be notified by certified or registered mail at least 30 days prior to the effective date of cancellation, non -renewal, or material alteration of such policy. All liability insurance shall cover comprehensive general liability for both bodily injury (including death) and property damage, including but not limited to aggregate products, aggregate operations, aggregate protective and aggregate contractual with the following minimum limits: A combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability of $2,000,000.00 for each occurrence will be considered equivalent to the above minimum limits for Comprehensive General Liability. 2 Page 8 of 72 Each Person Each Occurrence Aggregate Bodily Injury $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 Property Damage $1,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 A combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability of $2,000,000.00 for each occurrence will be considered equivalent to the above minimum limits for Comprehensive General Liability. 2 Page 8 of 72 Property Damage Insurance shall cover full replacement value for damages to any property caused directly or indirectly by or from acts or activities of the Contractor or its sub -contractors or any person acting for the Contractor or under its control or direction. The Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its sole expense, and throughout the term of this Contract Agreement and any extension thereof, Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance coverage for owned and non -owned automotive equipment operated. Such coverage limits shall not be less than $1,000,000 combined single limit. Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration, and defense expenses. The Contractor shall also furnish the City with a certificate evidencing Worker's Compensation Insurance with limits as established by the State of California. The Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 7. The Contractor hereby agrees to provide and maintain in effect two (2) good and sufficient Surety Bonds for one hundred percent (100%) each of the contract price. The bonds shall be a "Faithful Performance Bond" which shall guarantee the faithful performance of all work and a "Labor and Materials Payment Bond" which shall secure the payment of the claims of labor, mechanics, or materialmen for all work under the Contract pursuant to Section 3247 of the Civil Code. 8. The Contractor, the Contractor's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns guarantee that all work performed under this Contract fully meets the requirements thereof as to quality of workmanship and materials furnished. If any defects in materials or workmanship become evident within a period of one year from the date of the acceptance of the work by the City Council, the Contractor shall, at his or her own expense, make any repair(s) or replacement(s) necessary to restore the work to full compliance with the Plans and Specifications. 9. The Contractor and any agents or subcontractors of the Contractor shall pay the prevailing rates of per diem wages established by the California Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor and any agents or subcontractors of the Contractor shall also adhere to the California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, "Public Works and Public Agencies," and the California Administrative Code, Title 8, Group 3, "Payment of Prevailing Wages upon Public Works," all of which are made a part of the Contract documents. 10. The Contractor agrees that he or she and its subcontractors shall maintain and keep books, payrolls, invoices of materials, records on a current basis, and recording all transactions pertaining to this Agreement in a form in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles. Said books and records shall be made available to the City of Lake Elsinore, County, the State of California, and the Federal Government and to any authorized representative thereof for purposes of audit and inspection at all reasonable times and places. All such books, payrolls, invoices of materials, and records shall be retained for such periods of time as required by law, provided, however, notwithstanding any shorter period of retention, all books, records, and supporting detail shall be retained for a period of at least three years after expiration of the term of this Agreement. 11. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the Contractor will be permitted the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the City of Lake Elsinore to ensure performance under Contract. At the request and expense of the Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City of Lake Elsinore, or with a state or federally chartered bank as the escrow agent, who 3 Page 9 of 72 shall pay such monies to the Contractor. Securities eligible for substitution under this section shall include those listed in Section 16430 of the Government Code, bank or savings and loan certificates of deposit, interest- bearing demand deposit accounts, and standby letters of credit. The Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for monies withheld and shall receive any dividends or interest thereon. The Contractor shall give the City written notice within thirty (30) days after the Contract is awarded that it desires to substitute securities for money that would ordinarily be withheld. If the substituted securities are deposited into an escrow, the escrow shall be governed by a written escrow Contract Agreement in a form which is substantially similar to the Contract Agreement set forth in Section 22300, of the Public Contract Code. 12. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City of Lake Elsinore, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (RDA), its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, damages or injuries to any person, including injury to the Contractor's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of this Contract Agreement, or are caused or claimed to be caused by the negligent acts of the Contractor its officers, agents, employees, sub -contractors or suppliers, and all expenses of investigating and defending against the same; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, RDA, its officers, agents, or employees. The obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless set forth herein shall include, without limitation, any and all attorney's fees incurred by the party to be indemnified, defended, or held harmless, whether in a judicial or administrative action or in arbitration, and whether the issue is between the parties or involves one or more third parties. 13. The parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions herein contained. The Contractor may not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any obligation assumed by the Contractor hereunder without prior written consent of the City. 14. Should either party bring any legal or equitable action for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its rights under this Contract Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall recover in addition to all other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to be fixed by the court. In addition to the foregoing award of attorney's fees, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees incurred in any post judgment proceedings to enforce any judgments in connection with this Contract Agreement. The Provision is separate and several and shall survive the merge of this Provision into any judgment. 15. By my signature hereunder, as Contractor, I certify that I am aware of the Provisions of Section 3700, of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the Provisions of that code, and I will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 16. The effective date of this Contract Agreement shall be the date of the Award of Contract by the City of Lake Elsinore, 17. Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors' State License Board. Any questions concerning a Contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors' State License Board, 3132 Bradshaw Road, Sacramento, CA 95826. Mailing address: P.O. Box 26000, Sacramento, CA 95826. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS Page 10 of 72 City of Lake Elsinore, Municipal Corporation Grant M. Yates Manager DATE: INTERNAL USE ONLY ATTEST: City Clerk (only needed if Mayor signs) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: City Attorney Date RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Department Head (if contract exceeds $15, 000) Date SIGNING INSTRUCTION TO THE CONTRACTOR: Marathon General, Inc. 2317 Auto Parkway Escondido, CA 92029 License No./ Classification: 551314 Expiration Date: 4/30/2015 Federal I.D. No.: 33-0311206 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: Date Date All signatures on the Contract Agreement on behalf of the Contractor must be acknowledged before a notary public. General Partners must sign on behalf of the partnership. In the event that the contracting firm is a corporation two (2) corporate officer's haying authorityjjQm the corporation MUST sign (two (2) signatures total). If the corporation has a corporate resolution stating that one person is authorized to sign on behalf of all officers, attach corporate resolution immediately following the notary certificates. Corporate Seal may be affixed hereto. Page l l or 72 Page 12 of 72 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the _ day of '2013, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional consulting services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue for a period of one (1) year or the completion of the project. 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $ 18,640.00 without additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City. 5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City. Extra work will be invoiced separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of Services. Page 13 of 72 6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Page 14 of 72 8. Consultant's Books and Records a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a) (2).) Page 15 of 72 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall complete and submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Page 16 of 72 ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. V. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing an AM Best rating of no less than A: VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: I The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured's with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 5 Page 17 of 72 vi. The insurance provided by this canceled, or reduced in coverage or in notice has been received by the City. Policy shall not be suspended, voided, limits except after thirty (30) days written C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. 9980 Indiana Avenue, Suite 14 Riverside, CA 92503 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit A. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit A without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. M Page 18 of 72 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising there from. 7 Page 19 of 72 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE: CONSULTANT: ATTEST: Virginia A. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Page 20 of 72 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES GEOMAT Testing Laboratories, Inc. Page 21 of 72 EXHIBIT A GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. Soil Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Materials Testing, Geology July 23, 2013 Project No. 13084-01 Caltrans Certified, Lab No. 562 City of Los Angeles Certified, Lab No. 10217 AASHTO and ASTM Certified TO: City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 ATTENTION: Mr. Peter Ramey SUBJECT: Response to RFP and Fee for Professional Construction Geotechnical Services, Elm Street Improvements, City Project No. 4385-2 GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide the City of Lake Elsinore with complete geotechnical and material testing and inspection services per the subject RFP. We are committed to providing the City of Lake Elsinore with high quality services in a timely and cost efficient manner. As a team member, we will be committed to provide all the resources to perform necessary soil sampling per Caltrans Construction Manual and 2012 Green Book, soil testing, aggregate testing, asphalt mix testing, testing of pipe bedding material, and compaction testing in accordance with the scope of work assigned to us to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the department. Our firm is fully staffed and carries professional/general liability insurance, auto, and workman compensation insurance. Our certified laboratory and well qualified local professional and technical staff will assure that an exceptional level of service is provided to the project team. With our vast experience, local presence, and low overhead you can expect quality service at reasonable rate. Our capabilities, project experience, resumes, and references are attached for you review. Mr. Haytham Nabilsi, P.E. is the project manager and contact at GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc.. His contact information is as follows: Email Havtham(Ogeomatiabs.com Phone (951)688-5400 or(951)634-1618 We look forward to work with you on this important contract. Should you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call this office. Submitted for GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. Haytham Nabilsi, GE 2375 Principal Engineer Distribution: [1) Addressee 9980 Indiana Avenue . Suite 14. Riverside • California • 92503 • Ph (951) 688-5400 • Fax (951) 6885200 www.aeomatlabs.com,.email: info@geomatiabs.com Page 22 of 72 W Yg �.MRF z FIN 21 M-14 I NO " xu g Is (D 4— 1 M, MUM mm g a Nm. �g– ll"MA, �,M EME 1 -'a 0),a Z) X D- LU Page 23 of 72 I LO 0) M 00 0 O t,C� 00 C� 0 C� 00000c), 0- a 0 0;, OM 0 n OD n OD�l 0 (0 0 00 0 00 0 000 0 n ci (N (0 cc) CS . .. . R, Wiji z 0 C> kw; 0 c. 0 0 a a y. C) 0 0", R. 6 6 0 0 Lo ci 0 A,: Ci Ld K;� in w L6 OD w . ci co . 00 . 00 0O . . ci 0 C4 -j'R L6 ca R Z Ne 0 On N w CD W C4 11- NP IM R WY I RQ m w w w 0 (U Z M Z: I-- M X- a: W M Lu W W Lu w 2. RX F A r. p, In, E YN" E t 0 W 0 a CL 0 0 0 (U 0 (0 E2 ID 0) 0) E cD (D 0 CCU 110 E 0 p S2 ca (D i, = E 0) m E E muco c ip— 0 1..; F - (n Z z �O cr. cu CL mt t- w E Ca (D 0 m 11 0 0 U) 0 0, Ful W 9 D ��v 0) — it cm ca 0 mn crl M�w w to 0 & IF M n- LL IL >z ¢¢ (0 m if LL lV7111 W Yg �.MRF z FIN 21 M-14 I NO " xu g Is (D 4— 1 M, MUM mm g a Nm. �g– ll"MA, �,M EME 1 -'a 0),a Z) X D- LU Page 23 of 72 I LO 0) M City of Riverside Victoria Avenue Valve Replacement Prosect City of Riverside Public Utilities Department 3750 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, Leonardo Fernando (951) 826-5694 Completion Date: July 2013, GeoMat conducted soil compaction, and material testing services during street rehabilitation. Material testing included soil, aggregate, and asphalt. City of Riverside Coonen Drive Water Main Replacement Project City of Riverside Public Utilities Department, 3750 University A venue, Riverside, CA 92501, Tamrat Seyoum (951) 826-5672 Completion Date: July 2013, GeoMat conducted soil compaction, and material testing services during street rehabilitation. Material testing included soil, aggregate, and asphalt. City of Riverside Public Works Pavement Rehabilitation, Pavement Coring City of Riverside, 3900 Main Street, Riverside CA 92522, Tsang Huang, (951) 826-2375 Completion Date: June 2013 GeoMat provided geotechnical and material testing for City of Riverside. Tasks included pavement coring, at 58 locations, sampling of material, R -value testing, and delineation of distressed pavement sections. We have used a CME 45 mobile drill rig to obtain access to the cross section of pavement material. We provided borehole logging, observations, sampling, and measurement of existing street conditions. The asphalt concrete and base thicknesses were measured to provide contractors with necessary information about the pavement prior to milling and/or grinding. City of Riverside Public Works Pavement Rehabilitation, Pavement Coring City of Riverside, 3900 Main Street Riverside CA 92522, Ryan O'Connell, (951) 826-5799 Completion Date: April 2013 GeoMat provided geotechnical and material testing for City of Riverside. Tasks included pavement coring at 109 locations, sampling of material, R -value testing, measurement of existing concrete curb depth, and delineation of distressed pavement sections. We have utilized a CME 45 mobile drill rig to obtain access to the cross section of pavement material. We provided borehole logging, observations, sampling, and measurement of existing street condition. The asphalt concrete and base thicknesses were measured to provide contractors with necessary information about the pavement prior to milling and/or grinding. City of Riverside Water Main Replacements in Wells Hedrick Jones, Wayfield Middleton Avenue City of Riverside, 3750 University Avenue, Riverside CA 92501, Kevin Munn$ (951) 826-5820 Completion Date: June 2013 Conducted geotechnical investigation for the water main lines. Field work included soil sampling to obtain in-place densities. Earth pressures and allowable soil bearing value was developed for the use in shoring design. Provided recommendations for the stability of trench excavation, maximum safe vertical cut, sloping trench sides, dewatering, excavatability, suitability of excavated soil for pipe bedding, backfill specifications, shoring options, trench repair pavement section, and soil chemical reaction to concrete and steel. 9980 Indiana Avenue • Suite 14 • Riverside • California • 92503 . Ph (951) 688.5400 • Fax (951) 6885200 w .geomatiabs.com, email: info@geomatiabs.com Page 24 oP 72 City of Riverside, 3750 Unive Completion Date: June 2013 Conducted geotechnical investigation for the water main lines. Field work included traffic control, drilling at 11 locations, soil sampling to obtain in-place densities. Earth pressures and allowable soil bearing value was developed for the use in shoring design. Provided recommendations for the stability of trench excavation, maximum safe vertical cut, sloping trench sides, dewatering, excavatability, suitability of excavated soil for pipe bedding, backfill specifications, shoring options, trench repair pavement section, and soil chemical reaction to concrete and steel. City of Riverside, 3900 Main Street, Riverside CA 92522, Ryan O'Connell, Completion Date: April 2013 GeoMat provided geotechnical and material testing for City of Riverside. Task included pavement coring at 33 locations in Arterial Streets, sampling of material, R -value testing, and delineation of distressed pavement sections. We have used a CME 45 mobile drill rig to obtain access to the cross section of pavement material. We provided borehole logging, observations, sampling, and measurement of existing street conditions. The asphalt concrete and base thicknesses were measured to provide contractors with necessary information about the pavement prior to milling and/or grinding. CA 92522, Ryan O'Connell, (951) 826-5799 Completion Date: April 2013 GeoMat provided geotechnical and material testing for City of Riverside. Task included pavement coring at 24 locations in Arterial Streets, sampling of material, R -value testing, and delineation of distressed pavement sections. We have used a CME 45 mobile drill rig to obtain access to the cross section of pavement material. We provided borehole logging, observations, sampling, and measurement of existing street conditions. The asphalt concrete and base thicknesses were measured to provide contractors with necessary information about the pavement prior to milling and/or grinding. 9980 Indiana Avenue • Suite 14 • Riverside • California • 92503 • Ph (961) 688.5400 • Fax (951) 688-5200 www.aeomatiabs.com, email: info@geomatiabs.com Page 25 of 72 Page 26 of 72 EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF CHARGES GEOMAT Testing Laboratories, Inc Page 27 of 72 GEOMAT Testing Laboratories, Inc. 9980 Indiana Avenue, Suite 14, Riverside, California 92503 Phone(951)688-5400 Fax (951)688-5200 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PROFESSIONAL FEE SCHEDULE GEOTECHNICAL,INSPECTION,AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Principal EngineedGeologist $ 115.00 Per Hour Project Engineer/Geologist 100.00 Per Hour Senior Engineer/Geologist 95.00 Per Hour Staff Engineer/Geologist 90.00 Per Hour Field Supervisor 90.00 Per Hour Technician (Field,Laboratory) 85.00 Per Hour Draftsperson 65.00 Per Hour Clerical 65.00 Per Hour ENGINEERING FIELD EQUIPMENT Nuclear Soil Gauge 5.00 Per Hour Vehicle Use 0.70 Per Mile SPECIAL FIELD EQUIPMENT Geophysics/Hydrology/Environmental equipment and monitoring devices will beinvoicedas arranged. LABORATORY UNIT PRICES Soil Moisture Content $ 20.00 Moisture/Density - ring sample 25.00 Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content 180.00 Maximum Dry Density -checkpoint 100.00 Maximum Dry Density - Caltrans 300.00 Sieve Analysis 100.00 200 Wash 65.00 Hydrometer Analysis 105.00 Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis 200.00 Specific Gravity - fine aggregate 75.00 Specific Gravity- coarse aggregate 75.00 Atterberg Limits 105.00 Sand Equivalent 95.00 Expansion Index - 120.00 Direct Shear- remolded 175.00 Direct Shear- undisturbed 150.00 Consolidation (w/o time rate) 200.00 Consolidation (w/lime rate), add per load 50.00 R-vatue - untreated 325.00 R -value - treated 575.00 HVEEM Test 420.00 AC Extraction and Gradtlon 200.00 Sulfate Content 65.00 Ph 65.00 Resistivity and Ph 160.00 Concrete Compression Test 35.00 NOTES Tdaxial testing, residual shear tests, permeability, abrasion and other testing will be charged by arrangement. Laboratory samples will be maintained for 30 days from date of report. A storage fee will be assessed if longer storage is required by the client. Expert witness testimony will be charged at 150.00 per hour; minimum charge of 600.00. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Overtime for field personnel will be charged at the basic rate plus 20.00 per hour. Overtime is the time in excess of 6 hours per day and all Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays. Heavy equipment, supplemental insurance, travel, shipping, reproduction and other reimbursable expenses will be invoiced at cost plus 15%, unless billed directly lo, and paid by, client. Per diem charges of 40.00 per day plug lodging will be charged when the project required an overnight stay. TERMS OF PAYMENT Invoices are payable upon receipt. A retainer of 50% of the fee is required for project with a total fee of $2,000.00 or less. The balance for these projects must be paid at the -time the report is released to the client. For field investigations, mobilization and equipment costs will be invoiced Immediately on authorization. Cost proposals are valid for 30 days. When personnel man-hour rates or test rates are part of a not -to -exceed or lump sum contract, man-hour rates for cancellations without adequate notice, additional man- hour charges for slow work progress or stand-by time, overtime, costs for travel and lodging, retests due to failed tests or additional tests for clients convenience or Inspectors shall be considered additions to the contract. DISCLOSURE Client agrees to provide all Information in Client's Possession pertinent to actual or possible presence of hazardous materials on the site, and agrees to compensate SID Geotechnical, Inc. for all costs associated with the unanticipated discovery of hazardous materials. _ Page 28 of 72 EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS GEOMAT Testing Laboratories, Inc Page 29 of 72 EXHIBIT C CERTIFI E OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMP AT INSURANCE I hereby certify tha ' the performance of the work which this Agreement is entered into, I shall not employ any pers in any manner so as become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of the State of Up niN/A Executed on this day of 2013 at , California. con gut anf AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the _ day of , 2013, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and TKE Engineering, Inc. ("Consultant"). 1:7x�itril�` A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional consulting services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue for a period of one (1) year or the completion of the project. 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $ 18,640.00 without additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City. 5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City. Extra work will be invoiced separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of Services. Page 31 of 72 6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 2 Page 32 of 72 8. Consultant's Books and Records a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a) (2).) Page 33 of 72 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall complete and submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Page 34 of 72 ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing an AM Best rating of no less than A: VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured's with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 5 Page 35 of 72 vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16, Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: TKE Engineering, Inc. 2305 Chicago Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit A. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit A without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. C. Page 36 of 72 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising there from. Page 37 of 72 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE: CONSULTANT: ATTEST: Virginia A. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney N Page 38 of 72 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES TKE Engineering, Inc Page 39 of 72 n Professional Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements Project Number 4385-2 fo r C:1 1 Y OF ,. LADE 0iLSINOU ';!;;1)RI?AM f.XTIlk FMI City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Prepared By: w w W t k f (- 1 1 -1 i _ r - I, i " . 1 A 11 Page 40 of 72 Section 1: Table of Contents Section 2: Project Understanding Section 3: Approach Section 4: Scope of Services Section 5: Team Organization Section 6: Qualifications/ Experience Section 7: Resumes Section 8: Client References Section 9: City General Requirements ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT `A............. SAMPLE CUT SHEET ATTACHMENT `B'............ EXPERIENCE ATTACHMENT `C ............. CITY FORMS ATTACHMENT `D'..... ....... ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION Prepared for the: L i i lit. C)L51 HOR-E City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Contact: Peter Ramey, P.E. Phone: (951) 674-3124 x246 Prepared by: DO FF TKE Engineering, Inc. 2305 Chicago Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Contact: Michael P. Thornton Phone: (951) 680-0440 e-mail: tnthornton@tkeengineering.com City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 41 of 72 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Lake Elsinore (City) desires to retain a professional survey consultant to provide all construction staking required to completely construct the curb, gutter, sidewalk and asphalt pavement improvements for the project including tie out all existing street survey monuments, re- establish destroyed monuments and set street intersection monuments that currently exist. The City desires to construct new PCC curb, gutter and sidewalk, asphalt concrete dike, drainage facilities and asphalt concrete pavement improvements on Elm Street. The project will include minor grading along the sidewalk locations and drain facility locations. In order to complete the project, the City requires a consultant to establish survey control, perform construction staking, locate and tie out all existing monumentation, reset monumentation upon completion of construction, file all appropriate corner records and restake lost or damaged stakes during construction. TKE Engineering, Inc. (TKE), was established in 2000, and in the last twelve years has developed into one of Southern California's premier full service consulting A/E/C firms. TKE was established with the goal of providing turnkey service for municipal projects in order to benefit our community. As a result of the focus of the firm on this mission, TKE has earned a reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and overall quality of work. We are a highly motivated, dynamic firm with the goal of being your preferred consultant. City of Lake Elsinore Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 42 of 72 PROJECT APPROACH quality surveying project management yields the Successful project delivery is our goal. Our following tangible results: definition of successful project delivery is: Smoother processing • Project completion that meets all project Efficient map processing requirements Foundation for effective design • Project completion on schedule Minimized construction changes • Project completion within budget Reduced claims and dispute resolution costs J We have developed this project approach in order to maintain an expertise in our core business of smaller projects with tight budgetary constraints. Our approach to your surveying projects, recognizing that both schedule and budget are of primary concern, dictates that services must be provided both efficiently and carefully. When this is coupled with the various constraints present with any project, it is critical that the City choose a consultant with a proven track record of delivering. With a familiar team of senior level surveying professionals, TKE is the right choice for this panel. With surveying projects, our experience tells us that there must be a proactive approach to completing the work in order to maintain cost constraint and stay on schedule. This approach includes early identification of critical surveying elements together with review of project schedule and tasks. Project Management TKE takes pride in our reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and overall quality of work, and believes that a high level of quality is needed on all surveying services including preparation or review of legal descriptions and associated plats, design surveys, construction surveys, survey control point establishment and monument preservation. High TKE believes that the most successful project management program is one that is applied inherently throughout the entire design process and all design activities. This program requires not only formal procedures for checking, but encourages the conscientious effort of experienced people to always "create quality" in every task performed throughout. This program has become a natural element in all aspects of TKE's management activities, and will guide our work on this contract: • Staff training and development • Assignment of experienced staff • Continuity of staffing • Project -specific work plan • Schedule compliance • Comprehensive field review and compilation of site data • Established checking procedures, including independent in-house QA/QC review • Dual (independent) quantity estimates This Project Management program is in place to ensure that surveying services provided by TKE continue to exceed the standards of our clients and that we will deliver the project on schedule and within budget. City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 43 of 72 SCOPE OF WORK Based upon a field visit and preliminary project research, we have prepared the following Scope of Professional Services that will lead to the City successfully completing the construction of the subject project. Herein we identify and describe each task required for project completion and provide a list of deliverables where it applies. Construction Staking Services Task 1.1 -Survey Control TKE will research existing survey documents and identify all potential monumentation. We will then perform a project site survey to establish horizontal and vertical control points to be used throughout construction. All vertical control points will be established based on City benchmarks. Task 1.2 -Construction Staking TKE will set construction stakes at the offset requested by the Contractor along proposed street alignment for drainage and erosion control facilities, ac dike, curb and gutter, sidewalk, residential drive approaches, and pavement subgrade. Stakes will placed at 25 -foot intervals and at all vertical curves, grade breaks, B.C.R.'s, E.C.R.'s, center of driveway and curb returns. Task 1.3-MonumentTi,. Reestablishment Once comprehensive records have been assembled, TKE will perform a monument tie verification survey. For each intersection, TKE will locate and occupy the centerline monument and measure angles and distances to each tie and adjacent monument along improvement alignments. If ties could potentially be disturbed during construction, TKE will establish new ties at safe locations. All data accumulated will be documented by field survey notes. Copies of the survey notes will be provided to the City. TKE will prepare pre -project Corner Records forms, in accordance with Assembly Bill 1414 requirements, for each intersection. We will utilize County required forms. Prior to submission of the forms to the County, TKE will submit them to the City for review. Upon City authorization, TKE will submit them to the County Surveyor for review and filing. After construction is complete, TKE will survey each intersection to determine if monuments have been disturbed. TKE assumes the contractor will be responsible for setting the monument well cap per Lake Elsinore Standard 601a. For each lost or disturbed monument, TKE will re-establish its position based on tie or record data and verify its location based on measurements to adjacent monuments. All data accumulated will be documented by field survey notes. TKE will prepare post -project Corner Records and City Tie forms, in accordance with Assembly Bill 1414 and City Standards 601c and 601d requirements, for each intersection. Again, we will utilize County required forms for Corner Records and file them only after the City has completed its review. TKE will provide six trips of restaking time to reset any stakes that were damaged or lost by the Contractor prior to constructing the required item. The restaking costs have been separated as an additive cost as requested by the City. mask 1.5 -Cut Sheet Submission TKE will prepare cut sheets for all stakes place in the field. The cut sheet will identify station, offset, point number, proposed grade, hub elevation, cut or fill required and remarks for each stake set. Three copies of the cut sheets will be submitted to the City for distribution to the Contractor, Inspector and all other required parties. A blank sample of TKE's cut sheet has been provided in Attachment `A'. City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 44 of 72 Proiect Team TKE fully recognizes the City's concern for high quality, timely performance, and precise communication when utilizing the services of a consultant. Each project conducted by TKE is managed and staffed by a project team assembled to meet the specific needs of the project. TKE has assembled a highly qualified and experienced project team, which we believe will best serve your needs. Resumes of each team member can be found in Section 7: Resumes. City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 45 of 72 Mr. Thornton, TKE's President, is in charge of all TKE projects. He has over 25 years of experience in engineering planning, design, land surveying and construction management for public works projects. He has worked on a variety of public works engineering projects including street improvements, park improvements, bike trail improvements, drainage improvements, and reclaimed water system improvements projects. Mr. Thornton has been responsible for managing including funding administration, planning, evaluating, and designing these projects and has provided construction engineering and surveying services for many of these same projects Mr. Renner, is the Vice President of TKE and has over 12 years experience in civil engineering infrastructure projects, including sewer and water improvements, transportation improvements, drainage improvements, facilities improvements and recreation improvements. He has managed numerous projects and has delivered projects for the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino as well as the cities of Fontana, Rialto, Upland, Riverside, Redlands, EI Monte, Moreno Valley, Colton and Corona. As a project manager, Mr. Renner has been responsible for survey and design production, supervising a staff of surveyors, engineers and drafters, coordinating work between the production team and the client, and for submitting all deliverables in a timely manner. He has successfully delivered a wide variety of complex and challenging projects and is dedicated to ensuring that the plans produced by TKE continue to exceed industry standards. Mr. Musser has over 45 years of experience in performing field and office surveying services for public and private projects including roadway and highway projects. Prior to joining TKE Engineering, Inc., Mr. Musser worked as a Partner in an engineering and surveying firm and supervised the mapping department providing mapping and calculations support for the firm's projects. He has prepared records of survey, parcel maps and tract maps in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, San Diego County, orange County and Los Angeles County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA, and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys. City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 46 of 72 UALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE TKE has extensive experience with an excellent reputation in both the design of and construction support of civil engineering and surveying projects. Our survey design experience is shown in Attachment'B'. Throughout our history of twelve years serving the Inland Empire region, we have provided multi- disciplinary design and construction support services for large and small projects. We have successfully completed complex and challenging projects for a variety of municipal agencies who have continued to request that we partner with them in delivering much needed infrastructure to their communities. We are sure that the successful results of our past performance in the delivery of projects, along with our firm's proven ability to utilize our experience for a complete and well engineered project, will provide a valuable resource to the City of Lake Elsinore. City of Lake Elsinore -- Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 47 of 72 Project Role City Liaison Education MS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Long Beach BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Registration Registered Civil Engineer, PE 44226 (CA) Professional Land Surveyor, LS 6867 (CA) Affiliations Riverside -San Bernardino Counties Branch, American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association California Rural Water Association ,Mr. Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S., M.S. Mr. Thornton, TKE's President, is in charge of all TKE projects. He has over 25 years of experience in engineering planning, design, land surveying and construction management for public works projects. He has worked on a variety of public works engineering projects including street improvements, park improvements, bike trail improvements, drainage improvements, and reclaimed water system improvements projects. Mr. Thornton has been responsible for managing including funding administration, planning, evaluating, and designing these projects and has provided construction engineering and surveying services for many of these same projects. Related Experience • Fontana Civic Center Parking Improvement Project, City of Fontana, CA - This project consists of the design and reconstruction of 10 parking lots across the 26 acre site to create additional parking space for City Staff, Police and visitors of the civic center area. The project includes relocation of existing storm drain lines and catch basins, pedestrian and vehicular access to all buildings within the civic center area and themed landscaping and lighting scenarios. The project will provide more than 200 new parking spaces and increase parking lot efficiency. Upland Fire Station Rehabilitation Project, City of Upland, CA - This project included the demolition, seismic retrofit and reconstruction of a portion of the existing early 1900's era masonry fire station to incorporate a museum and to facilitate the preservation of the original historic Fire Station. The exterior of the building was completely renovated including removal of lead base paint and restoration of outdoor lighting, inclusion of ADA access, construction of a patio area in the rear of the building and other site improvements. San Bernardino Avenue/Etiwanda Avenue Force Main, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, City of Fontana, CA - Mr. Thornton served as Principal in Charge for this project, which provided 8,360 linear feet of 24 -inch and 30 -inch parallel DIP force mains and PVC electrical and fiber optic conduits. City of Lake Elsinore - Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 48 of 72 Project Role Project Manager QA/QC Education BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Registration Registered Civil Engineer, PE 69984 (CA) Affiliations Riverside -San Bernardino Counties Branch, American Society of Civil Engineers Mr. TerrY Renner, P.E. Mr. Renner is the Vice President of TKE and has considerable experience in civil engineering infrastructure projects, including sewer and water improvements, transportation improvements, drainage improvements, facilities improvements and recreation improvements. He has managed numerous projects and has delivered projects for the City of Rialto as well as the cities of Fontana, Upland, Riverside, Redlands, and Corona. As a project manager, Mr. Renner has been responsible for design production, supervising a staff of engineers and drafters, coordinating work between the production team and the client, and for submitting all deliverables in a timely manner. He has successfully delivered a wide variety of complex and challenging projects and is dedicated to ensuring that the plans produced by TKE continue to exceed industry standards. Related Experience • San Bernardino Avenue Street Improvements, County of San Bernardino, CA - Mr. Renner is the Project and Construction Manager for this 8,800 linear feet of street median, sidewalk, and storm drain improvements. This project involves coordination with Union Pacific Railroad, the City of Fontana and compliance with requirements of a wide variety of funding sources. Crestmore Avenue Water System Improvements, Rubidoux Community Services District, Rubidoux, CA - Terry was the Project and Construction Manager for this project, which provided 1,950 linear feet of 24 -inch CML&C transmission main improvements to increase flows from an existing well site. San Bernardino Avenue/Etiwanda Avenue Force Main, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, City of Fontana, CA - Mr. Renner was Project and Construction Manager for this project, which provided 8,360 linear feet of 24 -inch and 30 -inch parallel DIP force mains and PVC electrical and fiber optic conduits. Rialto Channel - Two Crossings Improvement Project, City of Rialto, CA - Mr. Renner was Project and Construction Manager for this project, which included construction of two RCB structures with wingwalls at Rosewood Street and Second Street, in conjunction with reconstruction of the upstream and downstream transitions made up of/z-tan loose riprap. City of Lake Elsinore - Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 49 of 72 Mr. Ron Musser, P.L.S. Project Role Mr. Musser has over 45 years of experience in performing field and office Surveying services for public and private projects including roadway and Survey highway projects. Prior to joining TKE Engineering, Inc., Mr. Musser worked as a Partner in an engineering and surveying firm and supervised the mapping department providing mapping and calculations support for Education the firm's projects. He has prepared records of survey, parcel maps and University of California, tract maps in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, San Diego Riverside County, Orange County and Los Angeles County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA, and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys. Registration Related Experience Professional Land Surveyor, Fontana Civic Center Parking Improvement Project, City of LS 4230 (CA) Fontana, CA - This project consists of the design and reconstruction of 10 parking lots across the 26 acre site to create additional parking space for City Staff, Police and visitors Affiliations of the civic center area. The project includes relocation of American Council of existing storm drain lines and catch basins, pedestrian and Engineering Consultants vehicular access to all buildings within the civic center area and (ACEC) themed landscaping and lighting scenarios. The project will provide more than 200 new parking spaces and increase parking lot efficiency. • Upland Fire Station Rehabilitation Project, City of Upland, CA - This project included the demolition, seismic retrofit and reconstruction of a portion of the existing early 1900's era masonry fire station to incorporate a museum and to facilitate the preservation of the original historic Fire Station. The exterior of the building was completely renovated including removal of lead base paint and restoration of outdoor lighting, inclusion of ADA access, construction of a patio area in the rear of the building and other site improvements. • San Bernardino Avenue/Etiwanda Avenue Force Main, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, City of Fontana, CA - Mr. Musser served as Project Surveyor for this project, which provided 8,360 linear feet of 24 -inch and 30 -inch parallel DIP force mains and PVC electrical and fiber optic conduits. City of Lake Elsinore - Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 50 of 72 AGENCY CITY OF FONTANA - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF EL MONTE CITY OF UPLAND FONTANA ENGINEERING SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT CONTACT NAME MR. CHUCK HAYS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MR. CESAR ROLDAN, SENIOR ENGINEER j DATES SERVICES PROVIDED PHONE NUMBER (FROM/THROUGH) (909) 350-6530 (626) 580-2087 MS. ROSEMARY HOERNING, (909) 291-2931 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MR. NOEL CASTILLO, SENIOR (909) 350-7632 ENGINEER MR. STEVEN LEDBETTER, (909) 384-7225 WATER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS MANAGER I 2002 - PRESENT 2008 - PRESENT - 2002 - PRESENT 2002 - PRESENT 2002 - PRESENT Table 1. References Please see Table 1. above for a small, but representative list of agencies who have and continue to request TKE Engineering and Planning (TKE) assist them in delivering valuable projects to their communities. We respectfully request that you verify our qualifications with the above listed references. City of Lake Elsinore - Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 51 of 72 Standard Form of Agreement TKE has reviewed the City's standard form of agreement and takes no exception to the requirements of the standard contract. TKE currently holds all insurance requirements requested in the RFP and will provide the City with proof of coverage upon selection. All required City forms have been completed and are included in Attachment `C'. TKE is not exempt from Workers' Compensation Insurance and therefore did not attach the exemption form. City of Lake Elsinore — Request for Proposal for Construction Survey Services Elm Street Improvements, Project No. 4385-2 Page 52 of 72 ATTACHMENT "A' SAMPLE CUT SHEET Page 53 of 72 TKE ENGINEERING PROJECT NAME OF STREET OR IMPROVEMENTS GRADES FOR Civil •Environmental -Water Resources •Surveying •Construction Management SHEET N0. OF SHEETS DATE_ SURVEY CKLW CHECKEU UY i nc ava Ivo. STATION OFFSET PT# GRADE I ELEV. HUS CUT FILL REMARKS 3 2305 CN7CAGO AVENUE RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92507 PHONE (951) 680-0440 Page 54 of 72 ATTACHMENT "B' EXPERIENCE Page 55 of 72 c 0 a v a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R w o n n n o� cr O V ca a 0 a 0 0 o0 pr O O a o O 0 o fj C) i OOp pLna pa I Vl � iR J,fF �{} AA• tfr c 0 cx c c c c c c c c y.i W W i a d N N N N Ems- N -,,d E0S2 ELn:2 Ilii m V)� to En -Y ra U Lv ro cm Iw c� ro C(A a� co m LO v m CN c �,Y CN C� C� c� dl CO R7 O C01 N CN Qy C +M N N Cp_ G} y CO 41 W -t C _CO Wt �Cp+ G WN 4C0_� G'cl CEJ 4_CO± V �7 Ui C ,- La � l ,o 2 c 'C O_ rn 2 tJ C ,- O� L� C t O_ �Gi �L � O1 L O� L �t]n �� _O �1 w LL r W C �O_.+ `i w C S j LU 41 LU C W LU ECO co 2 C O 2 C O C L- C O C:0 C O C O h CSU LaV ' �:.� to 01U N C71U LaU GLU C71U C tn T} VI 'p C N -0 C N -0 VL C Vi 'O Ln -O aro th 'p om am Uam arca Uam UOMQU am C +.+ ,d V1 -V) O C E 0 d C C m " 7 ,i.� C j;,� O l M tn G C O C71 > C c o C _ 4' = N N t E a ] W e +a 0. W ti N W L O1 tL C> i � i +'fl> o Q ro m i OLj v c° s� aEi > fl. L Q 4 ° 4 b V aro L ` ra W U L ,D p 0 CL O E LA ro s S C N GJ O vim, 0 LsE 4-L¢ 0cx E>cUw6 CLL ar a` aEi C L' o w v v m ° a c° a ar o N � o w La o p C�� N t= 47 Y L W 61 L- O C C C/1 d N r0 E ra C O N Wim° oOC L!} .- O� v. C O M C C L Ln — ►- E +j p o Ir C O C Nw E7ct G aM o L02E�,a L y E O N 0 Ea) O� C O� �-WC EL L roroLJ�� xL0 WMA Ca -j a_>> W 0V1 �'yL0) > >•- La �a Jt17y+o ob L CLnLL oro C,o 0 o>° o Ia Li o o LM 0 0 a orates o'w 0(u C) U) L 0.0 �5c>,Li Q5E�otn.00C, O E D O C C N¢O E E u,�p LU +� "' E Icy E E p o ern �D C a Ln oo QU,� Hm2 ,«~E LI}�. +L rag cn 4-1 v �, W Gi In O m m E N a Ln ll E CI o�EC,° �c c� EoC Woc m� L L N a 4 _ to mE} E� Lv F ��o;m°E LnW a>W ¢cy�°% 4.1 °� m C �' N �' Ln ¢ C d i res m° �o� N m O a I, v ��°E tri Q Ln F�1 po+ L Ln °o L _ rE m Ea©4L)EomE:o+ U V -� L L VF� c e r� C c c C I c C � o ° La i C 4% C 4% d C p C ° Clo- ° C O C C C VL D 2 L- L L L L O O O O O O O O b U V U U u u U U U Page 56 of 72 19 C G1 C G a� o Cl o 0 Q O Ln L� E co n a m iv c o0U MV1 607 19 C G1 C tO 0 O 0 O O o 0 Q O Ln L� O 4 rl a m iv c o0U MV1 607 G � -O Page 57 of 72 C G1 C tO c ro iO c.o 0E ro t O Ln A) M a m iv c o0U MV1 G � -O 4i N O C �j 1A c U LU c' E w � c c o a cnG CM roIr rn C71 U ar 7 ro O a) G v ov,i(nUOro O M W Page 57 of 72 c ro � ro 0 a m iv c as c C a � c o r v M O 1 2 O M W oo n o ro E Q W o� L N a! > w E > w O L aJ O V L L iJ� E � C a1 G LnE 1 IA 'O O .0 O }' Vl C c d L V U Ii Ln V1 u� V1 tn � O o O v 0 O a L � 0 G 0 � *' ' o c In � ami O (D 0 O L C E 0 d e w G O O A V) p O 0 > Ln O a} O 1" 0 N C a) L V CL M {. a yef (n ¢ a �n E w w {Pr E C C C 3 C c c V1 G7 U- LaO L ((n O O 41 3I 5 c Page 57 of 72 0 o r v v oo n o v o� V O 67 O O 0 O 0 O 0 G 0 o 0 o 0 C) O o 0 O O 0 O 0 d O O O A V) p O 0 O Ln O i. O 1" O lG) N Ln M {.f} M {. � yef 84 w {Pr C O U C W � C y E Ln Y 0 C m C ro C ro C Gcn ro c C fac C ro G ro cn C> ro r- ro G cn c r C C c C C C Gn Y t31 Y CT y O1:2 Of y +M:,;2 IT :2 cn Y c1:2 ro i C G 1p C O G ro C 1p C ro G C ro >= ro C ro a) '- a1 N a) N al V} ay to ay N N (h y N y In w N ch L .OC :3.2 2 2 O :3.0 O� .O M.0 _p .O L G O G: L C 4, C L C L C L c I- c L C L C L N Q1 (} i?V N M .A 01 v al y �1 N dl N VI .� �Vl C IA a •N C G VI c N G IA G cA C N C cA G 0 C u ro O U inU ❑ U ❑ U ❑ U ❑ U ❑ U in U a U a c ar G ro m v avi D 0 t� cam, LDa °IA a 2�n E a) Dace �� c ° Lu uu ro a c� ° = V- WC Uc j v "cu U +oma M C y iV(jj}} �L to Q IU iJC 7 w > ' a7 a. OCl C L d% D U G Q roa aJ n ❑ u >. �, o a a TQ d a Q1 % a ro _ N _ N ro ¢ c M C CL < a Q ,Ny u CL Q u N C 4- c w C 0,0 4- (D 00 a rN-I a F' C 00 .0 .Na v- C rl O D OL O m O LL OfC6 D C u- fC6 D C ,- G E IL w �_ J 0 .L`.I a ° a o of -i (U ��y°L a� Wj a+ �° �o > O t OCL CCL O C O Q -J •G J ,C 00 7 J QjCL 0 7 O J u 0 p. D M a O C O ,� LLn .� O Ll IM 4- 0 •N E .1 Q (N N a 00 ro M GL N C. a Q n a +4 cu CL C O L '� Ll1 f(fCL ro as cu E a D c laa n 3 �, o 4,� L a m Tr 0 `a) c m � � c N � ami (5 0 H a UJ� (p E Ln0 a) � O L.v N NaC7 � i D !i C L U N G C 3 j C ��Na U.I.. Q10 7 U a°'j Nw��'� U > aCL j � O N ro a] ❑?roC Ol 2- OGL ro � M ❑ N> ,_ wQGL ro N w O E ro N U t L U V t Ip -W +C� V1 +J C p C m } 4. C C +C+ _N Z, cA i❑ p y a+ n C ro - m +r C . C7 ya N C D3 Ip C- m V1 =p ro E L U D3 ro C- � Cn C. E 7 7 j ffl +❑ �= O w V 0 3 V -0 E w .at w 4- L .. t+ o ro u 4 0 E v O 4 E w 0 D a) E w o w 0 ._ D ro ,u D a ._ a ._ Ts ._ EEo.`° �c`�:.0 75Ei! ZE��� ccuV) aoX0U-i (Jm��o�cULn�8JU)u �c°°tnU V Page 57 of 72 U 0s 'o CL C 0 a E it 0 o� fa a d LT `o L a C 0 L.CL pq E IA 01 L d c O w 4J v N 0 N 0 N 0 CL t4 a.+ a� O1 o Go o Eft v o U m +� aro QE V O r -I E c O 0 0 0 a o O a to 0 0 O l0 p O O IO Ln 00 Ln }fir VI N Ln AftC U C 0 0 O a o 0 U 0 Ci 0 a L c cm L C U1 y +i4 1h A 4A' cu in ,q fR (M_ c_ C e_ t U) Y +° V) Y Cal m 4S Wcn u CN �� c� c e CL c Cl C C cn C OL MM tT � w C •. V) w N 0 ii N C aa (n t w C7 t � Chcn a � E m �_ L 2 L rnU CDU .W rnL rnU •m U) � �� W 0) -N C -0C ofuUU r- Cn,E Y C rn ro r- dro a� C) ` C y M(AiU) ro 5. (U LU U Li U1 �Jd ya Ct Vl CD 0 j U s cc o_ _o c Al o C) *-I 00 Ln LU m C CA 0 L 4� O '�'' 47 � 2t c c til 2 2 c O w¢J cu > LMwLA L 0 O C]. ++ .°WIUO�+n V'D� cu9 > Lj h 'p ICv O L = a o 0 o .E >ro c ° '� L E E sn C '� t7 O M -0 ro ►+ O t N 4 c ° a o ro o m U U C c C L9 a G tT c IT c .O G O m'0 O'0 U ICO w N c cam. L C N O a 'i N U LnIt N m U IY M i! CL L 0, L O 41 o is cn .E .2 E2 ��_ D -,r-.LL ro o o 0 au nV Z� 0 0 4 I r-1 a� E sc� "' a > C A > a1 w N ECL 'L : 0 L F; �V E a oz> E 3 0 uE m � O� © m ���++ C lJ 40- � C' C �1 C E be a E C,�N _ ro Ec Ica, L c E L UQ N a v C 2:u lOid {nun% 0 N V) ro D Cn N U 0 E LA C f8 t4 ro to E o%o 0E .v E CL ti a �m 3 U 0 0 0 0 04- 0 _L `! A U)0 M w D �w o[w0Q U U U U LT `o L a C 0 L.CL pq E IA 01 L d c 0 a.+ a� O1 o Go o Eft v o N o +� +� aro � r -I E V a.r N O U C 0 0 aQ a o 0 0 Ci 0 a L d O L O U1 y +i4 1h -V� 4A' cl ,q fR C O U tT p1 tT w N ii N C aa ro cu oo ro CD � Chcn a � E m �_ in - L (nom V) 0) C tll N C � �� a) C CSCE � 41 c1� C� E� ro 4, Cn,E Y C rn ro r- c c En C+�do C ` C y M(AiU) ro 5. (U LU aft Li U1 �Jd ya Ct Vl cc ro coo C �cc,c 0 0 0 s cc o_ _o c Al g '� t '� o_ Ln LU ti t'i LU LLl '�'' 47 � 2t c 2 2 c O 2 2 c O c O mG_oNto LMwLA —V v v vtiU CnU CDC C aLCLIUUc N C c 0UL) h 'p ICv C C u°c°� N .0Vi o lc0 .0 � � E�0 L E U} a 0 i 1 i O r -I O t N 4 C u V C +' �a� L 0 +� c 0 n- C a) !O o ° O w a c c cam. L C N a 'i N U LnIt N m U IY M in E ro ro ] O 20 a o °'� rn� E2 a D -,r-.LL ro `� ms a) .4 +n (J E �+ 't3 r-1 tU c p m U a x "' f °� > u O Lr) C O m : 0 L C e O ♦Y e O L Q CL 23 r- 0� U 0 *'I m d C E U O� © m ���++ C lJ 40- � C' C �1 C oa be C,�N 0- U OaN UQ N O C V? 0 V) ro D Cn N U E LA ~ mo 0 o%o 0E a a a c C:c �m 3 roc � ro roM t1 x �.- L roroC C1 x 0 _L `! A U)0 M w D �w LL N m c C a d) ro a ro a a Cl '0 Z) D iY 0 0 0 o 4-- o Z7 ,� 2� t tJ Ls U v U U Page 58 of 72 ATTACHMENT 'C" CITY FORMS Page 59 of 72 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U,S.C. 1352 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: a. Contract ® a. Bidlofferlapplication ® a. Initial filing b. Grant b. Initial award b. Material change c. Cooperative agreement c. Post -award For Material Change Only: d. Loan Year Quarter_ e Loan guarantee gate of last report f. Loan Insurance b.fume and Address of Reporting. Entity: 5. If Reporting Entity In No. 4 is Subawardee. Enter Name Prime ❑Subawardee and Address of Prime: TKE Engineering, Tnc. Tier if known 2305 Chicago Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Congressional District, if known. Congressional District, if known: G. Federal DepartmentlAgency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description: NOT APPLICABLE CFDAlNumber, if applicable 8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known: $ -0- 10- Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if (If individual, last name, first r)arne, M!): different from No. 10a) (Last name, first narrre, 111): NOT APPLICABLE 11. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title Signature: ' 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activitios is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by Print Name: Michael P. Thornton the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This Title: President information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who falls to file the Telephone No.:9 s z - 6 80 - 0 A A 47ate: 8 / 1 / 2 013 es p required disclosure shalt be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Authorized for Local Reproduction =.0 �• t Standard form —LLL (Rev 7_97) Standard Form LLL Rev. 06-04.90 P:IPROJECTSUEMESCAL CANYON ROADIRequest for Proposal Temescal Bridge 2009Aoc Page 60 of 72 LIST OF SUBCONSULTANTS PROJECT NAME: Elm Street Improvements PROJECT NO: 4385-2 CONSULTANTNAME: TKE Engineering, Inc. NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP Duplicate this form as necessary to report all subconsultant(s) I Page 61 o'1' 72 Certification for Contracts Grants Loans and Cooperative Agreements (Federal Fiscal Year 1, hereby certify on behalf of (Name and title of Grantee official) _The City of Lake Elsinore, that (Name of Grantee) to (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, of cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, and contracts and subcontracts under grants, subgrants, loans, an cooperative agreements) which exceed $100,000, and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Executed this _1st of _ August , 2013 _. By: (Signatu o uthorized official) Terry Renner, Vice President (Title of authorized official) Page 62 of 72 EXHIBIT "C" CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE I hereby certify that in the performance of the work for which this Agreement is entered into, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of the State of California Executed on this 1st day of August 2013 at Riverside California. Consultant Page 63 of 72 ATTACHMENT "D" ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION Page 64 of 72 For the satisfactory performance and completion of the Services under this agreement, the City will pay the Consultant compensation as set forth herein. The total compensation for this service shall not exceed ( INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ) ($ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT __)_without written approval of City's City Manager (or applicable position) ("Total Compensation") ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION Compensation for the services will be comprised of the following elements: 1.1 Direct Labor Costs; 1.2 Fixed Fee, and; 1.3 Additional Direct Costs. 1.1 DIRECT LABOR COSTS Direct Labor Costs shall be paid in an amount equal to the product of the Direct Salary Costs and the Multiplier, which are defined as follows: 1.1.1 Direct Salary Costs Direct Salary Costs are the base salaries and wages actually paid to the Consultant's personnel directly engaged in performance of the'Services under the Agreement. (The range of hourly rates paid to the Consultant's personnel appears in Section 2 below) 1.1.2 Multiplier The multiplier to be applied to the Direct Salary Costs to determine the Direct Labor Costs is 2 .7 0 , and is the sum of the following components: 1.1.2.1 Direct Salary Costs: 1.0 1.1.2.2 Payroll Additives 0.52 The decimal ratio of Payroll Additives to Direct Salary Costs. Payroll Additives include all employee benefits, allowances for vacation, sick leave, and holidays, and company portion of employee insurance and social and retirement benefits, all federal and state payroll taxes, premiums for insurance which are measured by payroll costs, and other contributions and benefits imposed by applicable laws and regulations. 1.1.2.3 Overhead Costs 1.18 The decimal ratio of allowable Overhead Costs to the Consultant firm's total direct salary costs. Allowable Overhead Costs include general, administrative and overhead costs of maintaining and operating established offices, and consistent with established firm policies, and as defined in the Federal Acquisitions Regulations, Part 31.2. Total Multiplier 2 .70 (Sum of 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2,2, and 1.1.2.3) Page 65 of 72 1.2 FIXED FEE 1.2.1 The fixed fee (Not to Exceed) is $-8, 4 0 0 . 0 0 1.2.2 A pro -rata share of the Fixed Fee shall be applied to the total Direct Labor Costs expended for services each month, and shall be included on each monthly invoice. 1.3 ADDITIONAL DIRECT COSTS Additional Direct Costs directly identifiable to the performance of the services of this Agreement shall be reimbursed at the rates below, or at actual invoiced cost. Rates for identified Additional Direct Costs are as follows: Item Reimbursement Rate (insert charges) Per Diem $60.00 /day Car mileage $0.60 /mile Travel $N/A /trip Computer Charges $10.00 /hour Photocopies $0.05 /copy Blueline $1.20 /sheet LD Telephone $N/A /call Fax $0.05 /sheet Photographs $1.00 /sheet Travel by air and travel in excess of 100 miles from the Consultant's office nearest to the City's office must have the City's prior written approval to be reimbursed under this agreement. 2. DIRECT SALARY RATES Direct Salary Rates, which are the range of hourly rates to be used in determining Direct Salary Costs in Section 1.1.1 above, are given below and are subject to the following: 2.1 Direct Salary Rates shall be applicable to both straight time and overtime work, unless payment of a premium for overtime work is required by law, regulation or craft agreement, or is otherwise specified in this Agreement. In such event, the premium portion of Direct Salary Costs will not be subject to the Multiplier defined in Paragraph 1.1.2 above. 2.2 Direct Salary Rates shown herein are in effect for one year following the effective date of the Agreement. Thereafter, they may be adjusted annually to reflect the Consultant's adjustment to individual compensation. The Consultant shall notify the City in writing prior to a change in the range of rates included herein, and prior to each subsequent change. E Page 66 of 72 3. POSITION or CLASSIFICATION (Sample) Principal Project Manager Sr. Engineer/ Planner Project Engineer / Planner Assoc. Engineer/ Planner Technician Drafter/ CADD Operator Word Processor RANGE OF HOURLY RATES $120.00 $110.00 $110.00 $100.00 $100.00 $50.00 $90.00 $55.00 2.3 The above rates are for the Consultant only. All rates for subconsultants to the Consultant will be in accordance with the Consultant's cost proposal. INVOICING 3.1 Each month the Consultant shall submit an invoice for Services performed during the proceeding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to the City's Executive Director with two (2) copies to the City's Project Coordinator. 3.2 Charges shall be billed in accordance with the terms and rates included herein, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the City's Representative. 3.3 Base Work and Extra Work shall be charged separately. The charges for each task and Milestone in the Scope of Services shall be listed separately. The charges for each individual assigned by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be listed separately on an attachment to the invoice. 3.4 A charge of $500 or more for any one item of Additional Direct Costs shall be accompanied by substantiating documentation satisfactory to the City such as invoices telephone logs, etc. 3.5 Each copy of each invoice shall be accompanied by a Monthly Progress Report and spreadsheets showing hours expended by task for each month and total project to date. 3.6 Each invoice shall indicate payments to DBE subconsultants or supplies by dollar amount and as a percentage of the total invoice. 3.7 Each invoice shall include a certification signed by the Consultant's Representative or an officer of the firm, which reads as follows: I hereby certify that the hours and salary charged in this invoice are the Actual hours and rates worked and paid to the employees listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. Purchase Order No. Page 67 of 72 4. PAYMENT 4.1 The City shall pay the Consultant within four to six weeks after receipt by the City of an original invoice. Should the City contest any portion of an invoice, that portion shall be held for resolution, without interest, but the uncontested balance shall be paid. 4.2 The final payment for Services under this Agreement will be made only after the Consultant has executed a Release and Certification of Final Payment. Page 68 of 72 EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF CHARGES TKE Engineering, Inc. Page 69 of 72 m m X W Page 70 of 72 0 0 0 0 0 o rn a� o v o » b d U p � C N V b M p y x0 O�iJ Q a N w U N N V k � W w N z» » » » w w W Q p O O G w G a a w i°; w x 9 a W W c Ua 7 K o V y '?3qN� II a F F h � www w w w z N a � � x C U w va w » » H s b� T � w » N O O Page 70 of 72 EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS TKE Engineering, Inc. Page 71 of 72 EXHIBIT[� n�/ EXHIBIT 'V CERTIFICATE OFEXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE I hereby certify that in the performance of the work for which this Agreement is entered into, | shall not employ any person ioany manner onnah)become subject tothe Workers' Compensation Laws nfthe State OfCalifornia EXeoutedon(hio 1st day of August 201�at Riveraide . California. Consultant ' ^ ` - � �r �` �w Page 72 ol'72 40 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF ity CouncilE:] Redevelopment Agency Other DEPARTMENT: F] CONSENT: APPEAL El BUSINES; El RESOLUTION: 71 ORDINANCES ATTACHMENTS: t7it ,F ��Lc=rra Report emailed to Clerk PUBLIC HEARING 17-10 -j a a ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a a ■ 1 ■ 1 ■ a ■ a a a a ■ a ■ a ■ ■ ■ a a ■ a ■ a ■ ■ a a of ■ a a a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ 1 a a a ■ ■ a ■ 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: a 1 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a it a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1 a a I Submitted by: Approved by: Date: Department Head: Date: Finance Director: Date: g 29 /3 City Manager: Date: CITY OF LADELSIIYONE DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION AND ROSETTA CANYON PARK EQUIPMENT ROOM CABINETS PROJECT NO. 4394 Recommendations 1. File the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder 2. Release all retention monies 35 days after the filing of the Notice of Completion Background In 2010, construction of Rosetta Canyon Fire Station and Rosetta Canyon Park equipment room were completed with the exception of cabinet installation. Cabinets were not installed because the City did not receive responses to the call for bids. In anticipation of the fire station activation, staff advertised and received eight bids for the construction and installation of cabinets. On February 26, 2013 City Council approved agreements for the cabinet construction services to Fortex Construction and for architectural support to STK Architecture. Discussion The re -advertised bid schedule included cabinet work for both the Rosetta Canyon Fire Station and the adjacent Rosetta Canyon Park equipment room. Fortex Construction completed the installation of all cabinets on June 27, 2013. Staff has inspected the work and has deemed it complete and consistent with the approved plans and specification. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 Page 1 of 5 Page 2 Notice of Completion August 27, 2013 Fiscal Im act The project was funded with Fund 232 Fire Facility and Fund 107 Developer Agreement Revenue. The project was completed under budget by $6,972.00. Prepared by: Peter Ramey PfL- Project Engineer Rita Thompson Senior Engineering Technician Ken Seumalo Director of Public Works Approved by: James Riley Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Vicinity Map Notice of completion Page 2of5 VICINITY MAP CABINET INSTALLATION ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page 3 of 5 Page 4 of 5 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Name City of Lake Elsinore Street 130 S. Main Street Address city a state Lake Elsinore CA 92530 NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Lake Elsinore 3. The full address of the owneris130 S " ajn Street 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is in fee. 41725 Rnsetta Canyon r)rive (FJrp.Stat lon) and 39 23 Arylprt on.V tnlav (Park Si}a) - (If other Man fine, sVike'II Fee' and intend, for example"purchaser under contract of purchase, a, lessee) 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvementon the pr Installation of new kitcher ted was completed on uum and other ancillary im 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was rrP)c CnnStrUctqnn Inn 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Lake Elsinore County of Riverside , State of California, and is described as follows: Kitchen and office cabinets The work done was: 9. The street address of said property is 41725 Rosetta Canyon Drive (Fire Station) and 39423 Ardenwood Way (Park Site) (If no scent address has been olf_.", assgned. Insect novo ) Dated: VERIFICATION Sgramreofowner, of co"duar.tfcedof owner City Clerk Citi b4 K9"091iidi'e I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Works / City Engineer the declarantof the foregoing ('President op "Mona,.! al. 'A panne' of; "Owner of; etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on At ig11st16,201 3 at I akp Ficlnore , California. (Date of signature) (City where signed) _�- (Fersonal signature of IM1a Ind dual wM10 s swearinB that iM1¢ convents of the nonce Of wmDletlon are fruo) Page 5 of 5 AGENDA COVER SHEET # �' i MEETING OF City Council Redevelopment Agency F Other DEPARTMENT: CONSENT: APPEAL BUSINESS: F1 RESOLUTION: a ORDINANCES [--] PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: lL tiIHAA t Report emailed to Clerk�,� ■■aa aaa aaa a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaararraa aaaaaarraaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaa� FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a 1 Submitted by: Date: Approved by: Department Hf Finance Directs City Manager: Date: Date: Date: ,i �c=�av�?JLL•r CITY OF LAKE LSII`IORE �'M DREAM EXTREME, REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR "LAKE ELSINORE" MONUMENT SIGNS WITHIN CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY Recommendation 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2013- o.�, approving the form of both the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 Freeway Maintenance Agreement, authorizing staff to submit the draft Freeway Maintenance Agreements to Caltrans, and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 Freeway Maintenance Agreements in their final form. Background On June 26, 2013, City Council adopted Resolution 2013-31 wherein the capital improvement project to install "Lake Elsinore" monument signs to the Franklin Street and Nichols Road overcrossings over Interstate 15 as well as four ground mounted monument signs was approved. The installation of the signs will require the City to enter into a maintenance agreement for Interstate 15 and State Route 74 as well as obtain an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. Discussion City staff is working with Caltrans to obtain the necessary design approvals and encroachment permits for the installation of the "Lake Elsinore" over crossing and ground mounted monument signs. While neither the design nor Caltrans' review is complete, Caltrans advised City staff that a Freeway Maintenance Agreement covering the maintenance of the overcrossing and ground mounted monument signs is required AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 Page 1 of 20 Page 2 Draft Freeway Maintenance Agreement August 27, 2013 Discussion as a condition of approval for the encroachment permit. Two agreements need to be approved, one for Interstate 15 and one for State Route 74. The Caltrans process for the maintenance agreement specifies the use of their standard format and the submittal of a draft for their review and approval. The attached Draft Freeway Maintenance Agreements have been modified in Sections I and II to cover the overcrossing and ground mounted signs. The modifications require the City to maintain, at City expense, the structural elements of the "Lake Elsinore" ground mounted signs and overcrossing signs, the portions of the overcrossing to which the design elements are attached, landscape installed adjacent to the ground mounted signs. Fiscal lm act Estimated annual maintenance cost of approximately $5,000 for vandalism repair, routine repair and routine maintenance. Prepared by: Rita Thompson +v Senior Engineering Technician Ken Seumalo O " Director of Public Works Approved by: James Riley Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Vicinity Map Draft 1-15 Freeway Maintenance Agreement Draft SR -74 Freeway Maintenance Agreement Resolution No. .1013-05& Page 2 of 20 VICINITY MAP FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT "LAKE ELSINORE MONUMENT SIGNS" FREEWAY OVERCROSSING SIGNAGE Page 3 of 20 VICINITY MAP FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT "LAKE ELSINORE MONUMENT SIGNS" GROUND MOUNTED SIGNAGE Grand Avenue/SR 74 0 ST S_� W O i _ ._ l ztll uI Lu _ Ground Mounted Signage �YRailroad Canyon/115 MAR Ip S �� �'., �, w + L�i ` �.11 `, RI T. Page 4 of 20 FREEWAYMAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THIS AGREEMENT is made effective this day of 2013, by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and the CITY of LAKE ELSINORE; hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and collectively referred to as "PARTIES". SECTION I RECITALS WHEREAS, on January 13, 1987 a Freeway Agreement was executed between CITY and STATE, wherein the PARTIES consented to certain adjustments of the local street and road system required for the development of that portion of STATE Interstate 15 within the jurisdictional limits of the CITY of Lake Elsinore as a freeway; and 2. WHEREAS, CITY intends to install " Lake Elsinore" monument signs on the Franklin Street and Nichols Road overerossings over Interstate 15 as well as four (3) ground mounted monument signs with landscaping at the southwest corner of Interstate 15 off ramps at Central Avenue, Railroad Canyon Road, and Main Street; and 3. WHEREAS, the PARTIES hereto mutually desire to clarify and revise the division of maintenance, as defined in section 27 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and their respective responsibilities as to the "Lake Elsinore" monument signs.. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED: SECTION II AGREEMENT 4. CITY agrees to continue their control and maintenance of each of the affected relocated or reconstructed CITY streets and roads as provided for in the 1987 Freeway Maintenance Agreement and shown on that plan map attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and made a part hereof by this reference. 5. STATE agrees to continue control and maintenance of those portions adopted as a part of Interstate 15 proper as shown Exhibit A. 6. If there is mutual agreement on the change in the maintenance duties between PARTIES, the PARTIES can revise Exhibit A by a mutual written execution of Exhibit A. When another planned future improvement has been constructed and/or a minor revision has been effected within the limits of the freeway herein described which will affect the PARTIES' division of maintenance responsibility as described herein, STATE will provide a new dated and revised Exhibit A which will thereafter supersede the attached original Exhibit A and become part of this Agreement. Revised 5/16/13 Page 5 of 20 8/27/13 Interstate 15 —"Lake Elsinore' Monument Signs CITY and STATE agree to accept their then respective operational and maintenance responsibilities and related associated costs thereof in the event jurisdictional boundaries of the PARTIES should change and Exhibit A is amended to reflect those changes. CITY must obtain the necessary Encroachment Permits from STATE's District 8 Encroachment Permit Office prior to entering STATE right of way to perform CITY maintenance responsibilities. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 10. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSINGS 10.1. STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire structure of any STATE constructed vehicular and pedestrian overcrossings of Interstate 15 below the deck surface except as hereinafter provided. 10.2. CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, the deck and/or surfacing and structural drainage system (and shall perform such work as may be necessary to ensure an impervious and/or otherwise suitable surface) and all portions of the structure above the bridge deck, including, but without limitation, monument signs, structural elements required for installation and the screening attached thereto, lighting installations, as well as all traffic service facilities (sidewalks, signs, pavement markings, bridge rails, etc.) that may be required for the benefit or control of traffic using that overcrossing. 10.3. At such locations as shall be determined by STATE, screening shall be placed on STATE freeway overpasses on which pedestrians are allowed as directed by section 92.6 of the Streets and Highways Code. All screens installed under this program will be maintained by STATE, at STATE expense. 10.4. CITY will request STATE's District Encroachment Permit Engineer to issue the necessary Encroachment Permit for any proposed monument sign installation on an Interstate 15 overpass. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 11. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSINGS 11.1. STATE will maintain the structure proper of all STATE -constructed vehicular and pedestrian undererossings of STATE freeways while the roadway sections, including the traveled way, shoulders, curbs, sidewalks, wall surfaces (including eliminating graffiti), drainage installations, lighting installations and traffic service facilities that may be required for the benefit or control of traffic using that undercrossing will be maintained by CITY 11.2. CITY will request STATE's District Encroachment Permit Engineer to issue the necessary Encroachment Permit for any proposed ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument sign installation and adjacent landscaping in Interstate 15 right of way. This encroachment permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. Page 6 of 20 8/27/13 Interstate 15 —"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs 12. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES - Responsibility for the maintenance of any plantings or other types of roadside development lying outside of the fenced right of way area reserved for exclusive freeway use shall lie with CITY and not with STATE. 12.1 CITY is responsible for maintaining the landscaping adjacent to any ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument sign. 12.2 STATE will issue a long-term Encroachment Permit to CITY providing CITY ready access to the ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument signs and adjacent landscaping for the purpose of maintenance. CITY shall be responsible for complying with the conditions of said long-term Encroachment Permit. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 13. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 13.1. Nothing within the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not PARTIES to this Agreement or to affect the legal liability of a PARTY to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the operation and maintenance of STATE highways and local facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. 13.2. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon STATE arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY and all of their officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this Agreement. 13.3. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon CITY and arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be dome by CITY under this Agreement. 14. PREVAILING WAGES: 14.1. Labor Code Compliance- If the work performed on this Project is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of a "public work" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair; or maintenance work 2 Page 7 ot'20 8/27/13 Interstate 1 —"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs under Labor Code section 1771. CITY must conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, and all applicable provisions of California Code of Regulations found in Title 8, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, Articles 1-7. CITY agrees to include prevailing wage requirements in its contracts for public work. Work performed by CITY'S own forces is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. 14.2. Requirements in Subcontracts - CITY shall require its contractors to include prevailing wage requirements in all subcontracts funded by this Agreement when the work to be performed by the subcontractor is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1) and Labor Code Section 1771. Subcontracts shall include all prevailing wage requirements set forth in CITY's contracts 14.3. SELF-INSURED using Contractor - If the work performed under this Agreement is done by CITY's contractor(s), CITY shall require its contractor(s) to maintain in force, during the term of this agreement, a policy of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability, naming the STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate. Coverage shall be evidenced by a certificate of insurance in a form satisfactory to the STATE and shall be delivered to the STATE with a signed copy of this Agreement. 15. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by timely mutual written consent by PARTIES, and CITY's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement may be grounds for a Notice of Termination by STATE. 16. TERM OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement shall become effective on the date first shown on its face sheet and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the PARTIES or until terminated by STATE for cause. PARTIES are empowered by Streets and Highways Code Section 114 and 130 to enter into this Agreement and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this Agreement. 3 Page 8 of 20 8/27/13 Interstate 15 —"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Robert Magee, Mayor ATTEST: M. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk By: CITY Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION MALCOLM DOUGI-IERTY Director of Transportation By: Deputy District Director Maintenance District As to Form and Procedure: By: Legal Attorney Department of Transportation Page 9 of 20 8/27/13 Interstate 15 — "Lake tAsinore" Monument Signs EXHIBIT "A" DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE (Plan map showing Interstate 15 Freeway proper and CITY road/facilities) 4 I's VICINITY MAP FREEV�JAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT "LAKE ELSINORE MONUMENT SIGNS" FREEWAY OVERCROSSING SIGNAGE /I 11s Page 10 of 20 8/27/13 Interstate 15 —"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs VICINITY MAP FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT "LAKE ELSINORE MONUMENT SIGNS" GROUND MOUNTED SIGNAGE 6 Page 11 of 20 Page 12 of 20 FI2EEWAYMAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THIS AGREEMENT is made effective this day of 2013, by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and the CITY of LAKE ELSINORE; hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and collectively referred to as "PARTIES". SECTION I RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 3, 1975 a Freeway Agreement was executed between CITY and STATE, wherein the PARTIES consented to certain adjustments of the local street and road system required for the development of that portion of STATE SR74 within the jurisdictional limits of the CITY of Lake Elsinore as a freeway; and 2. WHEREAS, CITY intends to install " Lake Elsinore" monument signs on the Franklin Street and Nichols Road overcrossings over hiterstate 15 as well as a total of four (4) ground mounted monument signs with landscaping, with one at the intersection of Ortega Highway (SR 74) and Grand Avenue; and 3. WHEREAS, the PARTIES hereto mutually desire to clarify and revise the division of maintenance, as defined in section 27 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and their respective responsibilities as to the "Lake Elsinore" monument signs.. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED: SECTION II AGREEMENT 4. CITY agrees to continue their control and maintenance of each of the affected relocated or reconstructed CITY streets and roads as provided for in the 1975 Freeway Maintenance Agreement and shown on that plan map attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and made a part hereof by this reference. STATE agrees to continue control and maintenance of those portions adopted as a part of SR 74 proper as shown Exhibit A. 6. If there is mutual agreement on the change in the maintenance duties between PARTIES, the PARTIES can revise Exhibit A by a mutual written execution of Exhibit A. 7. When another planned future improvement has been constructed and/or a minor revision has been effected within the limits of the freeway herein described which will affect the PARTIES' division of maintenance responsibility as described herein, STATE will provide a new dated and revised Exhibit A which will thereafter supersede the attached original Exhibit A and become part of this Agreement. Revised 5/16/13 Page 13 of 20 8/27/13 SR 74—"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs 8. CITY and STATE agree to accept their then respective operational and maintenance responsibilities and related associated costs thereof in the event jurisdictional boundaries of the PARTIES should change and Exhibit A is amended to reflect those changes. 9. CITY must obtain the necessary Encroachment Permits from STATE's District 8 Encroachment Permit Office prior to entering STATE right of way to perform CITY maintenance responsibilities. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 10. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES - Responsibility for the maintenance of any plantings or other types of roadside development lying outside of the fenced right of way area reserved for exclusive freeway use shall lie with CITY and not with STATE. 10.1 CITY is responsible for maintaining the landscaping adjacent to any ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument sign. 10.2 STATE will issue a long-term Encroachment Permit to CITY providing CITY ready access to the ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument signs and adjacent landscaping for the purpose of maintenance. CITY shall be responsible for complying with the conditions of said long-term Encroachment Permit. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 11. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 11.1. Nothing within the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not PARTIES to this Agreement or to affect the legal liability of a PARTY to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the operation and maintenance of STATE highways and local facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. 11.2. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon STATE arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY and all of their officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this Agreement. 11.3. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon CITY and arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, Page 14 of 20 8/27/13 SR 74—"Lake Glsinore" Monument Signs including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under this Agreement. 12. PREVAILING WAGES: 12.1. Labor Code Compliance- If the work performed on this Project is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of a "public work" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair; or maintenance work under Labor Code section 1771. CITY must conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, and all applicable provisions of California Code of Regulations found in Title 8, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, Articles 1-7. CITY agrees to include prevailing wage requirements in its contracts for public work. Work performed by CITY'S own forces is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. 12.2. Requirements in Subcontracts - CITY shall require its contractors to include prevailing wage requirements in all subcontracts funded by this Agreement when the work to be performed by the subcontractor is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1) and Labor Code Section 1771. Subcontracts shall include all prevailing wage requirements set forth in CITY's contracts 12.3. SELF-INSURED using Contractor - If the work performed under this Agreement is done by CITY's contractor(s), CITY shall require its contractor(s) to maintain in force, during the term of this agreement, a policy of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability, naming the STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate. Coverage shall be evidenced by a certificate of insurance in a form satisfactory to the STATE and shall be delivered to the STATE with a signed copy of this Agreement. 13. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by timely mutual written consent by PARTIES, and CITY's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement may be grounds for a Notice of Termination by STATE. 14, TERM OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement shall become effective on the date first shown on its face sheet and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the PARTIES or until terminated by STATE for cause. PARTIES are empowered by Streets and Highways Code Section 114 and 130 to enter into this Agreement and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this Agreement. 2 Page 15 of 20 8/27/13 SR 74— "Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Robert Magee, Mayor ATTEST: By: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk By: CITY Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MALCOLM DOUGHERTY Director of Transportation By: Deputy District Director Maintenance District As to Form and Procedure: By: Legal Attorney Department of Transportation 3 Page 16 of 20 EXI3IBIT "A" 9/27/13 SR 74—"Lake Elsinore" Monument Signs DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE Vicinity Map SR 74 and Grand Avenue SR 74 SR 74 Location of Lake Elsinore Monument Sign, intersection of SR 74 & Grand Avenue i Page 17 of 20 Page 18 of 20 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-058 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FORM OF THE BOTH THE INTERSTATE 15 AND STATE ROUTE 74 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE DRAFT FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS TO CALTRANS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE INTERSTATE 15 AND STATE ROUTE 74 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS IN THEIR FINAL FORM. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore desires to attach "Lake Elsinore' monument signs to the Franklin Street and Nichols Road overcrossings over Interstate 15; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore desires to install four ground mounted "Lake Elsinore" monument signs and associated landscaping at the southwest corner of Interstate 15 and Railroad Canyon Road, Main Street and Central Avenue and at the intersection of State Route 74 and Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS, Caltrans, requires the City obtain from them an Encroachment Permit allowing for the signs to be placed in Caltrans right of way; and WHEREAS, As a requirement of issuance to the City of an Encroachment Permit Caltrans requires the City enter into a Freeway Maintenance Agreement with them to prescribe maintenance obligations for the signs; and WHEREAS, Caltrans further requires that their standard form for Freeway Maintenance Agreements be modified and a Draft submitted for their review and approval prior to execution; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That it hereby approves the form of the "Freeway Maintenance Agreement " with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the "Lake Elsinore" monument signs; and. SECTION 2. Authorizes staff to submit the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 draft Freeway Maintenance Agreements to the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for their review and approval; and Page 19 of 20 City Council Resolution No. 2013-058 Page 2 of 2 SECTION 3. Authorizes the Mayor to execute the Interstate 15 and State Route 74 Freeway Maintenance Agreements subject to any minor modifications approved by the City Attorney; and SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August 2013. Robert E. Magee, Mayor ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Z, Leibold, City Attorney Page 20 of 20 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF .� City Council Redevelopment Agency F-1 Other DEPARTMENT: CONSENT: APPEAL _ BUSINESS: 171 RESOLUTION: F-1 ORDINANCES F7PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: X ` I Report emailed to Clerk w r.■ .. a 0 a 00■ 0 a 0 a a a 0 a a a a 0. 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 a. a• a .. 0 a s a. a. a. a. 0 0 0 a a a 0 a a a 0 0 a w 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■arra ■ 0000 ■ ■ ... ■ ... ■ ■ .. ■ ... ■ 0000 r w r . a a 0000 a a ■ ... ■ 0000. ■ .. ■ a s a a a a . r a . • .. � � Submitted by: Approved by: Department He Finance Directs City Manager: Date: Date: //4-3 Date: `r Date: �/�r11- CITY LADEL LSII`ORE DREAM EXTREME - REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF DIESEL ENGINE FOR FIRE ENGINE AT STATION 94 (CANYON HILLS) Recommendation Approve the replacement of diesel engine for Station 94 fire engine in the amount of $25,000. Background On June 18, 2013, the fire engine at Station 94 experienced a catastrophic engine failure while responding to a call. The damage was so extensive that the entire diesel engine has to be replaced. Discussion Requests for bids were processed through the Riverside County Fire Department to replace and install the new engine. However, no acceptable bids were obtained. Therefore it was determined that the diesel engine be purchased from an approved vendor and installed by the Riverside County Fire Indio Equipment shop. This will be the most fiscally prudent option to make the repair. Fiscal lm act The estimate cost for repairs is $25,000. This will be funded through the Lake Elsinore Fire Department budget for fiscal year 2013-14. Prepared by: Mark Barr Battalion Chief Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 Page 1 of 1 CC AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF 9,7 Z o 13 City Council F-1 Redevelopment Agency a Other DEPARTMENT: El CONSENT: E] APPEAL _ F1 BUSYNESS: a RESOLUTION: " 2 E] ORDINANCES ATTACHMENTS: 5 etrf 7C Report emailed o Clerk raa aaaasaaaaaaaaaa■ ■aarraaaaa aaaaaraaaara FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: PUBLIC HEARING a s ua a a as w a w a s a a a a a a a a a a 0 r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1 Submitted by: ge2,k,&ZZ.:, Date: 8 - /ei --/3 Approved by: & I Department Head: Date: Finance Director: Date: % City Manager: Date:/ a j d Clry or,00 L A, KECji L S I N. 0 KE DR1:AM LXTRLML REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02 - ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2014-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT; AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT'S DISTRICT PLANS SECTION INCORPORATING DESCRIPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF CERTAIN COMMUNITIES IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65302.10) Recommendation 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2013-056; Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Negative Declaration No. 2013-01, prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, based on Findings. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2013-057; Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Adopting the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 Period, and Adopting Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Section Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). Background The City of Lake Elsinore received a letter of compliance dated May 8, 2013, from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) indicating that the Draft 5th Cycle Housing Element (for the period 2014-2021) submitted for their review along with revisions, meets the statutory requirements of State housing element law. HCD requires that the City finalize the adoption of this Element, as proposed by General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 Page 1 of'41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments August 27, 2013 Page 2 of 4 At their regularly scheduled hearing on July 16, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Resolution No. 2013-68, recommending that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration No. 2013-01; and unanimously approved Resolution No. 2013-69, recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. There was no written or oral testimony submitted to the Commission. Discussion Senate Bill 244 [California Government Code Section 65302.10(b)] requires cities to update the land use element of their General Plan on or before adoption of the Housing Element. The update must include the identification of unincorporated "island" or "fringe" communities within the City's sphere of influence or adjacent to it; an analysis and review of water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and structural fire protection needs; and an analysis and review of benefit assessment districts or other financing alternatives to extend services. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 includes both the Housing Element and Land Use Element Amendment. Housing Element The City of Lake Elsinore's 5th Cycle (2014-2021) Housing Element, if adopted before October 15, 2013, shall remain in effect for the next eight years. The Element provides a comprehensive strategy for maintaining and expanding the City's housing supply available to all economic segments in the community, including very low, lower, moderate and higher incomes. Land Use Amendments As required by Senate Bill 244, the City identified three existing "fringe" and "island" communities that are either within its sphere of influence or adjacent to it. Of these three communities, the Warm Springs and Lakeland Village communities are located within the City's sphere of influence and the community of Meadowbrook is adjacent to the northeast. Land Use Element amendments have been prepared for inclusion in affected chapters of the District Plans portion of the General Plan's Land Use Element. Section 10.8 — "Meadowbrook Community" has been added to Chapter 10.0 - North Peak District. Section 13.8 — "Lakeland Village Community" has been added to Chapter 13.0 - Lakeland Village Sphere District. Lastly, Section 15.7 — "Warm Springs Community" has been added to Chapter 15.0 - North Central Sphere District. In compliance with Senate Bill 244 requirements, the proposed amendments address existing and planned water, wastewater, flood control, and fire protection services within these communities and potential funding mechanisms that may be utilized for expansion of services based on already existing plans for expansion. The amendments do not make any specific obligation or expansion of existing plans to extend services to these Page 2 of 41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments August 27, 2013 Page 3 of 4 communities. The amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development or annexation proposals. Environmental Determination An Initial Study was prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 in which no mitigation measures were identified and items on the environmental checklist were determined as either "No Impact" or "Less than Significant Impact." Therefore, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division has determined that adoption of the 2014-2021 Housing Element and the related Land Use Element amendments will not have a significant effect upon the environment, and both Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 prepared for this project. Fiscal Impact There are no fiscal impacts not already anticipated with the adoption of the General Plan. The 5th Cycle Housing Element for the Period 2014-2021 is a housing strategy which encourages development of residential projects that generally cause negative impacts on City services. However, the proposed Housing Element is consistent with the General Plan which has balanced the housing needs for all economic segments in the community, and has anticipated service requirements to support these needs. Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP� Project Planner Reviewed by: Grant Taylor" Director of Community Development Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green AssociateP Planning Manager Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2013- s Adoption of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01. a. Initial Study/Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 (Distributed under separate cover) 2. Resolution No. 2013 -off Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. a. City of Lake Elsinore 5t Cycle Housing Element for the Period 2014-2021 (Distributed under separate cover) b. Land Use Amendments to Chapters 10, 13, and 15 of the District Plans portion of the General Plan 3. Exhibit "A": Letter of Compliance dated May 8, 2013 from the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Page 3 ole 41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments August 27, 2013 Page 4 of 4 4. Exhibit "B": Memo dated April 24, 2013 entitled "City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element 2014- 2021 Edits to Respond to HCD Comments." 5. Exhibit "C": Color, 11X17 copies of Figures NP -1, LLVS-1 and NCS -1 (Distributed under separate cover). 6. Draft Planning Commission Minutes for July 16, 2013. 7. Planning Commission Staff Report for July 16, 2013. Page 4 of 41 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-056 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2013-01 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013- 02. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore prepared a Draft 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 period which has been found in compliance with State law by the Department of Housing and Community Development; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65302.10(b) requires cities to update the Land Use Element of their General Plan in order to describe unincorporated "island" or "fringe" communities within or adjacent to the city's sphere of influence concurrent with adoption of the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 (the "Project") incorporates the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 period and the appropriate Land Use Amendments as required by State law; and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City completed an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment; and the Initial Study showed that the Project will have either "No Impact" or "Less than Significant Impacts" for all applicable environmental issues; and WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Initial Study, and based upon the standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, it was determined that it was appropriate to prepare Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 for the Project (the "Negative Declaration") ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, the City duly issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on August 7, 2013; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Negative Declaration was made available for public review and comment for a period of twenty (20) days beginning on August 7, 2013, and ending on August 27, 2013; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore considered evidence presented by the Page 5 of 41 City Council Resolution No. 2013-056 Page 2 of 3 Community Development Department with respect to this item and made its recommendation in favor of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 by unanimously adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-01 recommending to the City Council adoption of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into these findings by this reference. SECTION 2.The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Negative Declaration. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby determines that the Negative Declaration for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration and finds that the Negative Declaration represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 4. The City Council further finds and determines that none of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring recirculation of the Negative Declaration are present and that it would be appropriate to adopt the Negative Declaration as proposed. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates the following findings regarding the Negative Declaration: 1. The Project avoids the effects to the environment to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Based upon the Initial Study conducted for the Project, there is substantial evidence determining that all potential impacts to the environment resulting from the Project are at less than significant levels. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the Project may have significant effects on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received, and in light of the whole record presented, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2 Page 6 of 41 City Council Resolution No. 2013-056 Page 3 of 3 SECTION 6. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, the City Council adopts Negative Declaration No. 2013-01. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August 2013. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Z, Leibold, City Attorney 101 Robert E. Magee, Mayor Page 7 of 41 Page 8 of 41 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-057 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02, ADOPTING THE 5T" CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE 2014-2021 PERIOD, AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT'S DISTRICT PLANS SECTION INCORPORATING DESCRIPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF CERTAIN COMMUNITIES IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65302.10) WHEREAS, the Housing Element is one of the seven mandatory elements of the General Plan and has been updated in accordance with State Housing and Community Development guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore prepared a Draft 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 period which has been found in compliance with State law by the Department of Housing and Community Development; and WHEREAS, through its policies, procedures, and incentives, the updated Housing Element provides an action plan for maintaining and expanding the housing supply for all income levels in the City; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65302.10(b) requires cities to update the Land Use Element of their General Plan in order to describe unincorporated "island" or "fringe" communities within or adjacent to the city's sphere of influence concurrent with adoption of the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 (the "Project") incorporates the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 period and the appropriate Land Use Amendments as required by State law; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 empowers the legislative body to amend all or part of an adopted general plan if to do so would be in the public interest and so long as no mandatory element of the general plan is amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 is part of the City's Second (2nd) Cycle amendments to the Lake Elsinore General Plan for the 2013 calendar year; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department with respect to this item and made its recommendation in favor of General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 by unanimously adopting Planning Commission Page 9 of 41 City Council Resolution No. 2013-057 Page 2 of 3 Resolution No. 2013-69 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02; and WHEREAS, public notice of the General Plan Amendment has been given and the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a duly noticed public hearing held on August 27, 2013 with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed General Plan Amendment pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the California Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council hereby makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents will be protected. 2. The proposed Housing Element included within the General Plan Amendment will enable the City to meet the housing needs of its citizens. The Housing Element provides a comprehensive strategy for maintaining and expanding the City's housing supply available to all economic segments in the community, including very low, lower, moderate and higher incomes. 3. The amendments to the General Plan's Land Use Element included within the proposed General Plan Amendment comply with the requirements of the California Government Code. As required by Government Code Section 65302.10(b), the amendment to the District Plan component of the General Plan's Land Use Element addresses existing and planned water, wastewater, flood control, and fire protection Page 10 of 41 City Council Resolution No. 2013-057 Page 3 of 3 services within the three unincorporated "island" or "fringe" communities within or adjacent to the city's sphere of influence and potential funding mechanisms that may be utilized for expansion of each of these services. The analysis is based on already existing plans for expansion of these services and does not make any specific obligation to construct or to modify existing plans to extend these services to these communities. The proposed amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development or annexation proposals. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 showed that the Project will have either "No Impact" or "Less than Significant Impacts" for all applicable environmental issues. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and oral testimony, and the above findings, the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, adopting the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the 2014-2021 period and amending the District Plans section of the General Plan Land Use Element by adding the attached Sections 10.8, 13.8 and 15.7. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 27th day of August 2013. Robert E. Magee, Mayor r,�lrr��ll� Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Z, Leibold, City Attorney Page 11 of 41 Page 12 of 41 Exhibit B (Resolution No. 2013-057) Page 13 of 41 CITY or LSINOIZE DREAM EXTREME 10.8 Meadowbrook Community NORTH PEAK DISTRICT The Meadowbrook community is located immediately east of the North Peak District. Areas to the southwest and partially to the south of the cornrnunity consist of recent single family residential developments and the remaining areas to the west, north, east, and south generally consist of either similar rural residential or vacant hillside areas. The community consists of approximately 1,621.26 acres located on either side of State Highway 74 between the City and Sphere of Influence of Lake Elsinore and the City of Perris Sphere of Influence further to the north on State Highway 74. The topography in the community is relatively flat generally sloping downward to the south and east along State Highway 74, with some isolated areas with steep slopes and where it transitions to the surrounding hillsides to the north, west, and southeast that generally border the community. The community would generally be categorized as a "Legacy Community' which is a geographically isolated community that is inhabited and has existed for at least 50 years. This community generally consists of rural residential land uses with lot sizes approximately 1 - acre or greater. The Riverside County General Plan designates most of the property within this community for Very Low Density Residential (1 acre min. lot size) land uses. The balance of this area is designated for Rural Mountainous (10 acre min. lot size) and Commercial Retail land uses. As shown in Table NP -T2 approximately a quarter of the community area is vacant and could be developed with residential land uses. It is assumed that if this vacant property were developed as part of the City of Lake Elsinore that the City's Hillside Residential land use designation would be most appropriate to apply to the properties. Table NP -T2. Meadowbrook Community Vacant Land Development Potential Development Vacant Land Potential Assumption (net acres) Dwelling Land Use Designations (du/ac) Units Hillside Residential 0.2 435.15 87 Totals 435.15 87 10.8.1 Existing Infrastructure/ Service Conditions The community is located within the service area of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and according to EVMWD's Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Master Plan currently receives water service from EVMWD, but no sewer service. Wastewater is instead treated through individual septic systems. Water service is provided via a series of pipes that stretch into the community originating from the Meadowbrook pump station near State Highway 74 at the southwest corner of the community and continues along State Highway 74. Water pipes branch off at Hammack Avenue, Peach Street, and Kimes Lane to serve the western portion of the community and at Beryl Street, Maize Avenue, Richard Street, and CITY OF L A K F, E L s I N O It F GENERAL PLAIN NP -1 Page 14 of 41 NORTH PEAK DISTRICT CITY OF LADE 'ELSIIYOIZE DREAM E)ORE.ME Eugene Street to serve the eastern portion of the community and branch out further that serve most of the properties within the community. Flood control services are provided by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD). No RCFCWCD facilities are located within the community. Drainage consists of sheet flow across properties, or is located within natural drainage courses, or within paved or unpaved road areas. Fire protection services are provided by Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). RCFD has response time goals of seven (7) minutes for urban land uses and eleven (11) minutes for rural land uses. The community is located closest to Station 97 (Rosetta Canyon), approximately one mile to the southwest, and Station 60 (Canyon Lake), approximately two to three miles away to the southeast. These stations would generally meet the department's urban and rural response time goals. 10.8.2 Analysis of Infrastructure/ Service Needs and Deficiencies Due to the existing and planned low development intensities, the area functions with low levels of infrastructure and services. Major expansions of infrastructure and services do not appear warranted to serve this community. Pursuant to EVMWD's Wastewater Master Plan, no plans are indicated for expansion of sewer service for those areas currently not served. The community is not located within any adopted Area Drainage Plan or Master Drainage Plan, which would indicate no substantial regional flood control infrastructure in the area are planned. Although connected via State Highway 74 to the City of Lake Elsinore, the community is somewhat isolated due to the surrounding terrain to the west and south. This terrain likely limits the feasibility to connecting to EVMWD sewer facilities. The community previously was included in the City's sphere of influence, but was removed due to community residents' desires to disassociate with the City as well as the difficulty for the City to provide services and the area not being particularly important to long-term planning efforts. No substantial flooding concerns are apparent within the community. Additional flood control infrastructure beyond that already constructed likely would occur associated with development within the community on a project and site basis. If broader flood control measures are deemed appropriate and necessary, RCFCWCD would address the planning and engineering for such improvements in coordination with the City of Lake Elsinore and any development that may be occurring within the community. Fire protection services will continue to be provided to the community through existing stations and adherence to response time goals. Additional stations to serve the City of Lake Elsinore and the community may be deemed necessary in the future based on growth. CITY OF LAKE EhSINOKE GENERAL PLAN NP -2 Page 15 of 41 CITY OF LAKE471 LSINORE NORTH PEAK DISTRICT DREAM EXTREME 10.8.3 Potential Funding Mechanisms If infrastructure/ services did need to be funded, expansion of sewer service could be funded through an assessment district, which would be contingent on approval of property owners to be assessed fair share fees. Alternative or complementary funding could be through the City's general fund or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants. Flood control expansion could be funded through assessment districts, area/master drainage plan fees or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants as well. Additional fire stations, equipment, and personnel could be funded through a combination of development impact fees and taxes. C IT Y OF LAKE. ELSIN0ItE NP -3 G E N E R 1, P L A N Page 16 of 41 Iyvei s L IES .t M_� f PLAN NTNG IiI STIUCf] <R a o y s Mc, lY'1,- I�AItV -uA.q\ m.. g hPlll la OI INIIUlNCI' o , "1- "'%NAIADOW61l0OKCOMMIINIIY �I-IS p{p{ LAND (15P 1 •a, 7( k � -°L s i<.r• cs�, ' ja A. 4 GtrNGRAI AI COMMLRO\d -/ fa�.G ;3� �4 �� (( OrPN OFFN SrP nCr- .. 1111CIfiC PLAN 1VUIlCF�'. 0Itt lI AH I'. SINOKIClNT'I OF NIVH011ll t CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LIiK.L LSI IYOIZE 0 02� °s^^IL's NORTH PEAK DIST RICI' LAND USE PLAN FIGURE N11-1 Page 17 of 41 c'TY°ELAKELAND VILLAGE SPHERE LADE LSI DISTRICT DREAM EXTREME I .8} Lakeland Villag(, C orninwAil The Lakeland Village community generally consists of rural residential development with 'N- acre or larger size lots with some minor commercial or light industrial land uses. Properties within the community (468.74 acres) are designated by the Lakeland Village Sphere District Land Use Plan (Figure LLVS-1) as Residential Mixed Use, Low -Medium Residential, or Medium Density Residential. As shown in Table LLVS-T2, approximately a fifth of the community area is vacant and could be developed with residential land uses pursuant to the General Plan land use designations. Of the vacant areas, most notable is the approximately 70 acres designated as Low -Medium Residential which can be developed at up to six dwelling units per acre. If this area were to be developed at this intensity, potentially substantial water and wastewater improvements may be necessary to adequately serve such development. Table LLVS-T2. Lakeland Village Community Vacant Land Development Potential Totals 86.61 606 The community lies between Lake Elsinore on the northeast and hillsides to the northwest that transition into the Cleveland National Forest. Areas to the northwest and southeast generally consist of single-family residential land uses and are designated as such on the Land Use Plan (Figure 2.1A). The community would generally be categorized as a "Fringe Community' which is an inhabited and unincorporated territory that is within the City's Sphere of Influence, but not surrounded by the City of Lake Elsinore or any other City. 13.8.1 Existing Infrastructure/ Service Conditions The community is located within the service area of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and according to EVMWD's Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Master Plan receives water and sewer service from EVMWD for most properties within the community. Water service is not indicated as being currently provided for properties generally located southwesterly of Grand Avenue between Blackwell Boulevard and Trinity Way. Sewer Service is not indicated as being currently provided in the area of the community generally south of Akley Street and west of Blackwell Boulevard. Wastewater is instead treated through individual septic systems for those properties currently not served by sewer. Water service where available is provided via a series of pipelines and pump stations along backbone water CITY OF I.AKF. FLSI Nof lF, CI N GRA I. PLAN LLVS-1 Page 18 of 41 Development Vacant Land Potential Assumption (net acres) Dwelling Land Use Designations (du/ac) Units High Density Residential 21.5 0.42 9 Low Medium Density Residential .. - ------- 4.0 70.21 281 _.. Medium Density Residential _... 12.5 3.05 38 _.. Residential Mixed -Use 21.5 12.93 278 Totals 86.61 606 The community lies between Lake Elsinore on the northeast and hillsides to the northwest that transition into the Cleveland National Forest. Areas to the northwest and southeast generally consist of single-family residential land uses and are designated as such on the Land Use Plan (Figure 2.1A). The community would generally be categorized as a "Fringe Community' which is an inhabited and unincorporated territory that is within the City's Sphere of Influence, but not surrounded by the City of Lake Elsinore or any other City. 13.8.1 Existing Infrastructure/ Service Conditions The community is located within the service area of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and according to EVMWD's Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Master Plan receives water and sewer service from EVMWD for most properties within the community. Water service is not indicated as being currently provided for properties generally located southwesterly of Grand Avenue between Blackwell Boulevard and Trinity Way. Sewer Service is not indicated as being currently provided in the area of the community generally south of Akley Street and west of Blackwell Boulevard. Wastewater is instead treated through individual septic systems for those properties currently not served by sewer. Water service where available is provided via a series of pipelines and pump stations along backbone water CITY OF I.AKF. FLSI Nof lF, CI N GRA I. PLAN LLVS-1 Page 18 of 41 LAKELAND VILLAGE SPHERE DISTRICT CITY OF LADE LSINOR-E lines along Grand Avenue. Sewer service where available in the community is currently provided via 8" or smaller lines primarily and some 10"-16" lines and a series of lift stations to connect to the Regional Water Reclamation Facility located on the northeast side of Lake Elsinore. Flood control services are provided by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD). The community is not located within any adopted Area Drainage Plan or Master Drainage Plan, which would indicated planned flood control infrastructure in the area. Two RCFCWCD facilities (Lakeland Village Channel and Churchill Street Storm Drain) are located within the community. The remaining drainage consists of sheet flow across properties, or is located within natural drainage courses, or within paved or unpaved road areas. Fire protection services are provided by the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The community is located within the service area of Station 11 (Lakeland Village), which is located within the community. RCFD has response time goals of seven (7) minutes for urban land uses and eleven (11) minutes for rural land uses. The furthest portion of the community is located no more than two miles from the station; therefore the community would generally meet the department's urban and rural response time goals. 13.8.2 Analysis of Infrastructure/ Service Needs and Deficiencies Pursuant to EVMWD's Water Distribution Master Plan or Wastewater Master Plan, no plans are indicated for expansion of water or sewer service into those areas currently not served. The community is not located within any adopted Area Drainage Plan or Master Drainage Plan, which would indicate no substantial regional flood control infrastructure in the area are planned. Development at the densities as allowed by the General Plan could provide for, or encourage the extension of water and sewer service to the area. The vacant properties available for development within the community are located just north of the area currently not receiving sewer service. It could be reasoned that development of these areas could incrementally improve the ability for further improvements and connections to sewer for those not currently served. Although topography is relatively flat, occasional intervening slopes may hinder ease of sewer or even water service in the area without use of additional lift or pump stations to overcome these constraints. There has been historical opposition to annexation and provision of City services from community residents. Occasionally flooding may be experienced from Lake Elsinore onto adjacent properties, some of which are still identified within the 100 -year flood zone, although this has been improved in recent years through construction of a levee in 1995 and better management of the lake through the Lake Elsinore Stabilization and Enhancement Plan. 100 -year flood zones are located along three primary drainage areas that originate from the hills to the southwest and cross through the community into Lake Elsinore. Additional flood control infrastructure beyond that already constructed likely would occur associated with development within the community on a project and site basis. If broader flood control measures are deemed appropriate and necessary, CITY OF LAKE E1.SI N()RtG GI NF, RAL PLAN LLVS-2 Page 19 of 41 c'= 2 LAKELAND VILLAGE SPHERE L� LSIORE DISTRICT iv DREAM EXTREME RCFCWCD would address the planning and engineering for such improvements in coordination with the City of Lake Elsinore and any development that may be occurring within the community. Fire protection services will continue to be provided to the community through existing stations and adherence to response time goals. Additional stations to serve the City of Lake Elsinore and the community may be deemed necessary in the future based on growth. 13.8.3 Potential Funding Mechanisms New development beyond infill of low density residential development would need to fund expansion of services with development through private funding mechanisms. For existing development or infill requiring expansion of services, expansion of sewer service could be funded through an assessment district, which would be contingent on approval of property owners to be assessed fair share fees. Alternative or complementary funding could be through the City's general fund or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants. Flood control expansion could be funded through assessment districts, area/master drainage plan fees or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants as well. Additional fire stations, equipment, and personnel could be funded through a combination of development impact fees and taxes, if needed. CITY C)F 1,A KE ELS I NoRG GENF: RAI. I'1.AN LLVS-3 Page 20 of 41 l(41 " Al, • j F f 2 • EV yam` � %��� f ti ` I • s.``x } .k I'I C� f q ::PLANNINO )I1TIi1CTS ^p • � y -. ,b �� CI'T'Y BOUNDARY • A •, I$PI IERF or Nllul NCF F �IAKT AND VII IAGF COMMUNITY 1 VS z � dIF ^01 15 • F �� g I'UTURI solooIS ^� AStl j EXISIINO SCIIOOIS 9 InNn Use �ta�y^ �vl°� p' v�. �"• NEIGI IRORI HOOD COMMI RCIA1. IUSHDI NTIAI MIXFD USG V • a<� q IDSIDG U SIOINiIAI. • `�` a�/ LOW DINSIIYRF91 ENIIAI. �a Y LOW -MEDIUM RISIDFNTIAI 1z MOIMFI)IUM D6NSIIY RISIDENTIAI. - - - IIGI( DFNSITY RFSIDFNIIAI. IU F REAI IUNAI 1. 01M SIACI r��:? 1^unLlc wsnrunonnl. — - - SJLRU (IIVC I 161NORl. C.VN Ol lirvEx]UF _� _ CITY 01: LAKI'. I ISINCIRI LII LSC �LSIIYIII>`G o o.zs OlMUFv LAKELAND VILLAGE SPHERE LANE USI PLAN FIGURE LLVS 1 Page 21 of 41 CITYOF e! NORTH CENTRAL SPHERE LAK -E LSIRO E DISTRICT ?� DREAM EXTREME E'-`�.7 W1 11'171 `jWil)�rS C't111-1c1ltzl'liL The Warm Springs community generally consists of rural residential land uses typically on lot sizes 1/2 -acre or greater, with some smaller size lots. The entire community (approximately 341.21 acres) is designated as Low Density Residential on the North Central Sphere Land Use Plan (Figure NCS -1), which would allow for 1 to 3 dwelling units per net acre. As shown in Table NCS -T2, approximately a quarter of the Warm Spring community area is vacant and could be developed with residential land uses pursuant to the General Plan. Table NCS -T2. Warm Springs Community Vacant Land Development Potential Development Vacant Land Potential Assumption (net acres) Dwelling Land Use Designations (du/ac) Units Low Density Residential 10 80.63 161 Totals 80.63 161 Commercial land uses exist to the south of the community along Central Avenue and Temescal Canyon High School is located to the west of the community. These uses are reflected as such on the Land Use Plan (Figure 2.1A). Areas to the southeast and east between the community and Central Avenue contain a mix of vacant and similar rural residential development. This area is designated a mix of Business Professional and Medium Density Residential. Areas to the north of the community generally consist of vacant land or lower density rural residential generally designated as Hillside Residential. The area is generally relatively flat, sloping downward to the south, with some steeper terrain as it transitions to the hillsides to the north. The community would generally be categorized as a "Fringe Community" which is an inhabited and unincorporated territory that is within the City's Sphere of Influence, but not surrounded by the City of Lake Elsinore or any other City. 15.7.1 Existing Infrastructure/ Service Conditions The community is located within the service area of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and according to EVMWD's Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Master Plan currently receives water service from EVMWD with no properties receiving sewer service. Water service is provided via a series of pipes that stretch into the community along 11th Street, Red Gum Road, and Rosetta Street and serve most of the properties within the community. Wastewater is treated through individual septic systems. Flood control services are provided by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD). No RCFCWCD facilities are located within the community. Drainage consists of sheet flow across properties, or is located within natural drainage courses, or within paved or unpaved road areas. C I T Y Q l= 1. A. K F I; 1. S I N O R E: G F N F R A 1, P L A N NCS -1 Page 22 of'41 NORTH CENTRAL SPHERE CITY OF DISTRICT LADE � LSIIYOIZE -� � DREAM Fire protection services are provided by the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The community is located closest to Station 97 (Rosetta Canyon). RCFD has response time goals of seven (7) minutes for urban land uses and eleven (11) minutes for rural land uses. The community is also located near Station 10 (Elsinore), located approximately two to three miles to the south of the community, which would generally meet the department's urban and rural response time goals. 15.7.2 Analysis of Infrastructure/ Service Needs and Deficiencies Due to the existing and planned low development intensities, the area functions with low levels of infrastructure and services. Major expansions of infrastructure and services do not appear warranted to serve this community. Pursuant to EVMWD's Wastewater Master Plan, no plans are indicated for expansion of sewer service into those areas currently not served. The community is not located within any adopted Area Drainage Plan or Master Drainage Plan, which would indicate no substantial regional flood control infrastructure in the area are planned. Development at the densities as allowed by the General Plan for 1 to 3 dwelling units per acre would not likely provide for or encourage the extension of sewer service to the area. Development of adjacent areas to the north at even lower densities also likely would not provide for extension of sewer service that could serve the community. Potential future development of properties to the southeast and east for Medium Density Residential and Business Professional land uses may extend sewer lines closer to the community to potentially make further extensions more viable. There has been historical opposition to annexation and provision of City services from community residents. Based on topography of the community and surrounding area, if sewer service is extended to the community, the extensions may be served by gravity flow and not require lift stations. No substantial flooding concerns are apparent within the community. Additional flood control infrastructure likely would occur associated with development within the community on a project and site basis. If broader flood control measures are deemed appropriate and necessary, RCFCWCD would address the planning and engineering for such improvements in coordination with the City of Lake Elsinore and any development that may be occurring within the community. Fire protection services will continue to be provided to the community through existing stations and adherence to response time goals. Additional stations to serve the City of Lake Elsinore and the community may be deemed necessary in the future based on growth. 15.7.3 Potential Funding Mechanisms If infrastructure/ services did need to be funded, expansion of sewer service could be funded through an assessment district, which would be contingent on approval of property owners to be assessed fair share fees. Alternative or complementary funding could be through the City's general fund or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants. Flood control expansion could be funded through assessment districts, area/master drainage plan C I T Y or LAKE E L S I N O R G GEN FRA 1. PLAN NCS -2 Page 23 of 41 LAKE jLSIlYOR-E NORTH CENTRAL SPHERE DREAM DISTRICT fees or possibly available federal, state, or regional based infrastructure grants as well. Additional fire stations, equipment, and personnel could be funded through a combination of development impact fees and taxes. CITY C7F I:AKC F. i,S) NoI3F GF.NF. RA 1., PIAN NCS -3 Page 24 of 41 y .�..m«,>:�� - .._. . )�a.a .aa a.:r..r .ar.a�.r -a..a-r..:• z ,Fr,,,HPA1A �PIANNI N( DIR I➢C6 1 (HR/)r/Vfi illilbR 2 CITY WUNOARY y.JWARME0 IN II NCE _. �SPII WAIL SPIUN(iS(OAIMI)NITY 1 1 15 /13((t//1111J11 MAIM( SIIWY-79 t txlslwc, ca look�- ®I %FRAO NI OW ]" ll J "� IANDU%e IwsweSS PROIFi90NAI GfNmAI COMWRQAI 4 WCOMMHICIAI MIrLD UN IIIIIDF RISIDFNIIAl SI IOWMN9H1 RiSIDINTIAl ;LON MID FNS11 SIUFNIIAt (—R �nK �'yA MEDIUM UwsnY haus N7lnl IIIc,❑ DI NSI [Y ItISim P:NIIAI .OPEN SIACF ffli,PUIRICINSIITUTIONAI. xr1-u r. C"I W Ia: Som 11111wv aF nlcausl°r CITY OI° LAKE FLS INOR I NORTH CENTRAL SPHERE LAND USE PLAN LAKE ULb NORL N 0 oz 01,1111, FIGum NCS -I REVISIONS ADOPTED Ry THC CITY COUNCIL ON APRI1.23. 2013 Page 25 of 41 Page 26 of 41 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 2013-02 EXHIBIT "A" Letter of Compliance from the State Department of Housing and Community Development Page 27 of 41 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 1800 Third Street, Suite 430 P. O'Box 952053 Sacramento, CA 94252-2053 (91 C)) 323-3177 1 FAX (916) 327-2643 www. hcd.ca. g2v May 8, 2013 Mr. Richard J. MacHott Acting Planning Manager City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main St. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Mr. MacHott: MAY 13 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION RE: City of Lake Elsinore's 5t" Cycle (2014-2021) Draft Housing Element Update u m c 7 o N C9LIPORK�A• Thank you for submitting the City of Lake Elsinore's draft housing element update received for review on April 3, 2013, along with additional revisions received on May 2, 2013. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(b), the Department is reporting the results of its review. A telephone conversation on April 17, 2013 with you, Ms. Carole Donohoe, Planning Consultant, of the City, and Mr. Nelson Miller and Ms. Genevieve Sharrow of Hogle-Ireland, the City's consultants, facilitated the review. The draft element along with the revisions meets the statutory requirements of State housing element law. The draft element along with the revisions will comply with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code) when they are adopted and submitted to the Department, pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(g). To remain on an eight year planning cycle, pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) the City must adopt its housing element within 120 calendar days from the statutory due date of October 15, 2013 for SCAG localities. If adopted after this date, the City will be required to revise the housing element every four years until adopting at least two consecutive revisions by the statutory deadline (Government Code Section 65588(e)(4)). For more information on housing element adoption requirements, please visit our website at- http://www.hcd.ca..qov/hpd/hrc/plan/he/he review ado tionste x110812. df. The Department appreciates the efforts of Ms. Donohoe in the preparation of the housing element and looks forward to receiving Lake Elsinore's adopted housing element. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Jess Negrete, of our staff, at (916) 323-3185. Sincerelykaen. mpora Assistant Deputy Director Page 28 of 41 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02 EXHIBIT "B" Memo dated April 24, 2013 entitled "EDITS TO RESPOND TO HCD COMMENTS" Page 29 of 41 to Jess Negrete, State Department of Housing and Community Development from Genevieve Sharrow, MIG I Hogle-Ireland cc Carole Donohoe and Richard MacHott, City of Lake Elsinore re City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element 2014-2021 Edits to respond to HCD comments date April 24, 2013 Jess: Enclosed for your review are the revisions to the Draft Housing Element to respond to your comments from our telephone conversation on April 17. In addition, due to new information received by the City recently, we have revised information on page 38 related to the RHCP program funding loss at Parkview Apartments. The rent restrictions remain in place, but this additional assistance will no longer be available to residents, so we have clarified the availability of this funding source. HCD Comment Page Proposed Revisions Number Employee 66 Language revised to state that the City complies Housing Act with the State Employee Housing Act where it language needs would apply. clarification Indicate how 66 Section revised to indicate that SROs would be SROs would be processed as a hotel or motel, or as a multi -family processed development, depending on the project components and zone. Clarify density 57, 67, The City's density bonus ordinance is consistent bonus - 68, 115, with State law, including allowable incentives. consistent with 129 Clarifications were made throughout the document. State law or In the RMU zone, as noted on page 67, density additional bonuses may be granted if a project provides a incentives variety of amenities, including but not limited to, affordable housing. PLANNING I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 169 N MARENGO AVENUE I PASADENA, CALIFORNIA t PHONE 626-744-9872 1 FAX 626744.9873 1 www.migcom,com Offices in Berkeley, Davis & Fullerton. CA I Eugene & Po 0and, OR I Raleigh, NC � �� � leateage30of41 HCD Comment Page Proposed Revisions Number Clarify 138 Policy 2.1 revised to clarify affordable housing is "affordable" in low- and/or moderate -income housing. Policy 2.1 3 "Affordable housing" is also clarified at the beginning of the document to be housing that is designated for and affordable to low- and moderate -income households. Program to 139-140 Program 8 has been removed from the Housing preserve 52 at- Element and programs (and program references) risk units is have been renumbered/corrected. unnecessary 40-42 Discussions on cost of replacement/preservation of (none at risk) 52 units has been removed. B1 - B4 Appendix B (list of qualified entities to preserve at - risk units) was also removed. Transitional and 143-144 Program 15 is revised to include an objective to Supportive review the Zoning Code to ensure compliance with Housing GC Section 65583(a)(5) as related to transitional pursuant to S132 and supportive housing, within 4 years of Housing Element adoption. Include timeline 144 Program 16 revised to add timeframe for to revise completion. definition of family Add more 137- Program 4 revised to add an additional housing quantified 138, rehab program and quantified objective. objectives to 140, Program 8 revised to add a quantified objective. programs 146 PLANNING I DESIG N I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT 1 TECHNOLOGY 164 N MARENGO AVENUE I PASADENA, CALIFORNIA I PHONE 626-744-9872 1 FAX 626-744-4873 1 www,mi9com.com Offices in Berkeley- [Davis & Fuilerrtan. CA I Eugene & Portland, GR I Raleigh- NC • 1 IT ZTage 31 of 41 Page 32 of 41 Attachment No. 6 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JULY 16, 2013 Page 33 of 41 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 Page 7 of 11 Commissioner Jordan asked for clarification regarding the Specific Plan Amendment and the planning areas. The applicant clarified. Vice Chairman O'Neal asked about the school that is supposed to be built within the Specific Plan next to the new location of the community center. City Attorney Leibold stated that the school site is still designated as a school site. The City Council required the developer, as part of an overall park implementation plan, to fully improve the 24 -acre regional park, and in exchange, release the interior park, at which point, the developer requested to move the recreational center to the center park. She stated that McMillan is still negotiating with the School District. Also, the school site will be an Elementary School instead of K -8th. Chairman O'Neal stated that he is encouraged about the shift in procedures regarding final determination for design reviews. City Attorney stated that it is something that the applicant prefers, and is something that the City has incorporated into a variety of Specific Plans. Motion by Commissioner Jordan and seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2013-66, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, approval of Specific Plan No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East lake Specific Plan, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval; Motion passed 5-0. Motion by Commissioner Jordan and seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2013-67, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, approval of a revision to Tentative Tract Map No. 31920; subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval; Motion passed 5-0. 5. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 — Adoption and implementation of the City of Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element; and Adoption of Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Section incorporating descriptions and infrastructure analysis of certain communities in order to comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). Recommendation a. Adopt Resolution No. 2013-68 recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopt Negative Declaration No. 2013- 01 Prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. b. Adopt Resolution No. 2013-69 recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approve General Plan Amendment No. Page 34 of 41 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 Page 8 of 11 2013-02, Adopting the 5th Cycle Housing Element for the Period 2014-2021, and Adopting Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Sections Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in Order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). Planning Consultant Donahoe presented the Staff Report Vice Chairman O'Neal wanted to confirm that there is no annexation in the sphere of influence. Planning Consultant Donahoe indicated that this is correct. Chairman Morsch wanted to confirm that the Housing Element deadline date is October 15, 2013. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the Housing Element deadline date is October 15, 2013, although there is a 120 -day extension, if it is not approved. Chairman Morsch and Commissioner Blake stated that staff did a good job Motion by Commissioner Jordan and seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2013-68, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, adopt Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02; Motion approved 5-0. Motion by Vice Chairman O'Neal and seconded by Commissioner Jordan to approve Resolution No. 2013-69, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, approve General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, adopting the 5th cycle Housing Element for the period 2014-2021, and adopting Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Sections Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in Order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10); Motion approved 5-0. STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Taylor stated that Planning had five items that were approved by the City Council on July 9, 2013 which were: • Extension of Time for a Tentative Tract Map in Ramsgate. • Fairway Park Industrial Subdivision of 17 acres into nine lots. • Meritage Homes (76) homes. • Lake Elsinore Outlet Center. • 7 -Eleven He also stated that that Planning received a submittal by Wal-Mart Page 35 of 41 Page 36 of 4] Attachment No. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOR JULY 16, 2013 Page 37 of 41 CITY Y C)F LASE LSMOKE IaRE:AM FXI-ItEME REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD J. MACHOTT, LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE PLANNING MANAGER DATE: JULY 16, 2013 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02 - ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2014-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT; AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT'S DISTRICT PLANS SECTION INCORPORATING DESCRIPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF CERTAIN COMMUNITIES IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65302.10) Background The Housing Element is one of seven mandatory components of the General Plan. State law generally requires Housing Elements to be updated every five years to reflect the community's changing housing needs. State law also requires that each draft Housing Element be submitted to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and that the Department's findings be incorporated into the Housing Element prior to adoption. Additionally, Senate Bill 244 [California Government Code Section 65302.10(b)] requires cities to update the land use element of their General Plan on or before the adoption of the Housing Element. The update must include the identification of unincorporated "island" or "fringe" communities within the city's sphere of influence; an analysis and review of water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and structural fire protection needs; and an analysis and review of benefit assessment districts or other financing alternatives to extend services. Page 38 of 41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments July 16, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Project Description Housing Element The City of Lake Elsinore's 5th Cycle (2014-2021) Housing Element, if adopted before October 15, 2013, shall remain in effect for the next eight years. The Element provides a comprehensive strategy for maintaining and expanding the City's housing supply available to all economic segments in the community, including very low, lower, moderate and higher incomes. The City Council and City Planning Commission held a Joint Study Session/Workshop on February 12, 2013 where the Draft Housing Element was introduced to the City's decision -makers, the community, and to interested agencies and developers. At the direction of the City Council, Staff and the consultants who prepared the document completed requested changes, along with corrections by the City Attorney, and the Draft Housing Element was submitted to HCD on April 2, 2013. HCD responded within 10 days, and during a conference call with City Staff and the consultants, all HCD concerns were addressed and resolved. The consultants prepared a memo entitled "Edits to Respond to HCD Comments" which was submitted to HCD on May 2, 2013, a copy of which is attached to this Staff Report as Exhibit "B." The City of Lake Elsinore received a letter on May 8, 2013, from HCD indicating that the Draft 5th Cycle Housing Element (for the period 2014-2021), submitted for their review along with revisions, meets the statutory requirements of State housing element law. (See Exhibit "A" attached). HCD requires that the City finalize the adoption of this Element, as proposed by General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. Land Use Amendments As required by Senate Bill 244, the City identified three existing "fringe" and "island" communities that are either within its sphere of influence or adjacent to it. Of these three communities, the Warm Springs and Lakeland Village communities are located within the City's sphere of influence and the community of Meadowbrook is adjacent to the City's sphere of influence. Land Use Element amendments have been prepared for inclusion in affected chapters of the District Plans portion of the General Plan's Land Use Element. Section 10.8 — "Meadowbrook Community" has been added to Chapter 10.0 - North Peak District. Section 13.8 — "Lakeland Village Community" has been added to Chapter 13.0 - Lakeland Village Sphere District. Lastly, Section 15.7 — "Warm Springs Community" has been added to Chapter 15.0 - North Central Sphere District. As required by Senate Bill 244, the amendment to the District Plan component of the General Plan's Land Use Element addresses existing and planned water, wastewater, flood control, and fire protection services within these communities and potential funding Page 39 of 41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments July 16, 2013 Page 3 of 4 mechanisms that may be utilized for expansion of each of these services; based on already existing plans for expansion of these services and does not make any specific obligation or expansion of existing plans to extend these services to these communities. The proposed amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development or annexation proposals. Environmental Determination An Initial Study was prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 in which no mitigation measures were identified and items on the environmental checklist were determined as either "No Impact" or "Less than Significant Impact." Therefore, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division has determined that adoption of the 2014-2021 Housing Element and the related Land Use Element amendments will not have a significant effect upon the environment, and recommends adoption of Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 prepared for this project. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2013- : Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopt Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 Prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2013- : Resolution of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approve General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Adopting the 5t" Cycle Housing Element for the Period 2014-2021, and Adopting Amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Sections Incorporating Descriptions and Infrastructure Analysis of Certain Communities in Order to Comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, AICP Project Planner Approved by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Page 40 of 41 GPA 2013-02 - Housing Element & Land Use Element Amendments July 16, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2013- recommending that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration No. 2013-01. a. Initial Study/Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 (Distributed under separate cover) 2. Resolution No. 2013- recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02. a. City of Lake Elsinore 51" Cycle Housing Element for the Period 2014-2021 (Distributed under separate cover) b. Land Use Amendments to Chapters 10, 13, and 15 of the District Plans portion of the General Plan 3. Exhibit "A": Letter of Compliance dated May 8, 2013 from the State Department of Housing and Community Development. 4. Exhibit "B": Memo dated April 24, 2013 entitled "City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element 2014- 2021 Edits to Respond to HCD Comments." 5. Exhibit "C": Color, 11X17 copies of Figures NP -1, LLVS-1 and NCS -1 (Distributed under separate cover). Page 41 of 41 TCity Council DEPARTMENT: F1 CONSENT: APPEAL Y2BUSINER RESOLUTION: AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF pment Agency F] Other ATTACHMENTS: a ORDINANCES F-1 PUBLIC HEARING Report emailed to Clerk ■ a a a a a a a! a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a■■ a a a a a a a a a a a l FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: a)Y6L-- wa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a• a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a l Submitted by: Date: Approved by: Department IR Finance Direct( City Manager: Date: o —,o /(z Date: Date.- F-1 ate: CITY OF LADE LSII`IOIJE ��M DREAM EXTREME - REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, CITY CLERK DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2013-1316 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council take two separate actions: A. Clarify the City Council modification to the Design Review process under Amendment No. 10 to provide for final action by the City Council as a Consent Calendar item. B. Waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2013-1316 by roll - call vote: ORDINANCE NO. 2013-1316 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02, AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN Discussion The above -referenced Ordinance approving Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) was introduced at the regular City Council meeting held on August 13, 2013 following a noticed public hearing and is now being presented for second reading and adoption. Amendment No. 10 includes a change in the land use designation of 4 acres in the Recreation Village District of the ELSP which was approved by the City Council without modification. Amendment No. 10 also proposed a change in the Design Review process under the ELSP to allow the Planning Commission decision to be final, subject only to appeal to the City Council. The City Council rejected this proposal and modified the process to allow for the City Council to receive and file the Planning Commission action or, alternatively to request consideration. The modification followed an option AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 Page 1 of 6 Second Reading re August 23, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Ordinance Correcting Certain Time Limits offered by the City Attorney to balance the City Council's reluctance to allow for final Planning Commission action while at the same time avoiding delays in the Design Review process. Upon review, the City Attorney is concerned that the modified process may be confusing to the applicant and to the public and may conflict with the City's standard appeal procedures. Consequently, the City Attorney requests that the City Council clarify its action to provide that the Design Review decisions of the Planning Commission be presented to the City Council as a Consent Calendar item for final action by the City Council. This is consistent with recent actions by the City Council, avoids confusion and maintains a clear process. The City Attorney recommends that the City Council clarify this process prior to adopting the Ordinance approving Amendment No. 10. The clarification is a minor modification that can be incorporated into Amendment No. 10 and does not require reintroduction of the Ordinance. Prepared by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance No. 2013-1316 Page 2 of 6 ORDINANCE NO. 2013-1316 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-02, AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Brian Milich, McMillin Communities, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the project site is generally located southwest of the Links at Summerly Golf Course facility and in the central area of the East Lake Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item and made its recommendation in favor of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-66 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making decisions for approval of specific plans and specific plan amendments; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 13, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Prior to making a decision, the City Council has reviewed and analyzed Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.) and Chapter 17.204 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC"). SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for the approval of Specific Plan No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. Specific Plan No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required Page 3 of 6 City Council Ordinance No. 2013-1316 Page 2 of 4 implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et sea. of the California Government Code and Section 17.204 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well -integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that implementation of the Project will result in an improved design that consolidates the recreation facility location with an area that was already intended to be developed as a central neighborhood park for open space use. The relocation of the recreation facility onto PA 42 will centralize and thereby improve the location of multiple recreational amenities for future residents. In addition, the amendment also proposes to allow the Design Review Process to be considered and action be taken by the City Planning Commission, with an available appeal process to the City Council. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build-outt, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated that will result from implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan has been reviewed and accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 4. The Specific Plan Amendment shall identify a methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately served by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by the Municipal Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. Page 4 of 6 City Council Ordinance No. 2013-1316 Page 3 of 4 Specific Plan No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan identifies methodologies to allow land uses to be adequately served by existing or proposed public facilities and services. Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. In addition, the amendment will result in an improved design that consolidates the recreation facility location with an area that was already intended to be developed as a central neighborhood park for open space use. The relocation of the recreation facility onto PA 42 will centralize and thereby improve the location of multiple recreational amenities for future residents. 5. The overall design of Specific Plan No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby, strengthening and enhancing the immediate areas. The Project will complement the quality of neighboring existing and future uses by creating visually -pleasing development. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working near the Project or within the City, nor will it be injurious to property or improvements in the project area or within the City. In addition, staff has substantiated that all applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 and have incorporated all applicable comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a less than significant level, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Page 5 of 6 City Council Ordinance No. 2013-1316 Page 4 of 4 Environmental clearance and analysis for the proposed application is provided by a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 (SCH No. 2003071050). The SEIR evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build -out of the Specific Plan. The Project does not present changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development. No further environmental clearance is necessary. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council hereby approves Specific Plan Amendment No. 2013-02, Amendment No. 10 to the East Lake Specific Plan. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 13th day of August, 2013 and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 27th day of August, 2013. Robert E. Magee, Mayor ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Z. Leibold, City Attorney Page 6 of 6 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF 19L ( 3 12r City Council E�] Redevelopment Agency F7 Other DEPARTMENT: CONSENT: E] APPEAL BUSINESS: RESOLUTION: El ORDINANCES F—] PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: a t'hP urs OF Report emailed to Clerk K a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a f a a a a a a a a a a s a a s a a s a a a a a a i FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: a s a a a s a s a a a a s a a 1 s a a a a s a a a a s a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a f a a 1 a a a s a a s a a a a s a a a s a a a s a a a f a a g Submitted by: Approved by: Date: Department Head: Date: Finance Director: Date: Xf/ City Manager: Date: CITY OF LADE (fAILSI110RE DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 27,.2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANTING OF MEMORIAL TREE Recommendation Approve planting of a tree in memory of Anthony Devaney at McVicker Canyon Park. Background Anthony Devaney passed away on May 1, 2012 at the age of 19. Even at his young age Mr. Devaney was an active member of the community. He participated in the Sheriff's Explorer program, distributing food to the needy through his church and distributing wrapped gifts in the Cops for Kids program. In addition to his volunteering, Mr. Devaney enjoyed skateboarding at McVicker Canyon Park, riding dirt bikes and knee boarding. After Mr. Devaney's passing, AnnMarie Devaney was instrumental in promoting the relocation of street lights from the old alignment of Lake Street to the current alignment. These relocated street lights are along the east side of Lake Street extending from just north of Nichols Road to Temescal Canyon Road. Discussion In accordance with Council Policy No. 400-10, staff has met with Mrs. Devaney to discuss the potential type and location of a tree she would like to have planted in her son's memory. Attached are photos of the tree, Magnolia Grandiflora, that was selected as well as a vicinity map of McVicker Canyon Park. A plaque provided by Mrs. Davaney will be installed at the base of the tree in Anthony's memory. Staff has reviewed and approved the tree species and proposed location of the planting. AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 Page I of 8 Contract Award August 13, 2013 Page 2 Fiscal Impact There will be a minor labor cost estimated at $200 for the tree planting however the tree itself was donated by West Coast Arborist. Prepared by: Ken A. Seumalo 0 Director of Public Works Approved by: James Riley q"/ Director of Ad ' istrative Services Approved by: Grant M Yates City Manager Attachment: Vicinity Map Picture of Magnolia Grandiflora Council Policy on Memorial Tree Planting Page 2 of 8 VICINITY MAP MCVICKER CANYON PARK MEMORIAL TREE Page 3 of 8 Page 4 o1' 8 Page 6 of 8 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SUBJECT: Naming of Public Facilities; Policy No. 400-10 Memorial Tree Plantings Effective Date: 6/14/94 Revised: 9/12/06 Page No. 1 of 2 POLICY The Council considers it desirable that appropriate names be selected for parks and other public recreational facilities, including beaches. Further, the Council desires to provide for the planting of memorial trees in accordance herewith. The following guidelines shall serve as policy on these matters. Parks and Public Facilities A. Suggestions for naming new or existing parks or public facilities shall be reviewed by the Community Services Department with a recommendation being transmitted to the City Council for approval. B. New or existing park or public facilities names can be chosen from, but not limited to, the following categories: 1. Streets or schools bordering park 2. Topography 3. Theme 4. Common names already in place for the area 5. Persons of distinction who have contributed to or positively influenced the City and who, in the Council's determination, are deserving of such recognition C. Facility rooms or site amenities may be dedicated in honor of persons if done as part of a capital/fundraising campaign and with the approval of the City Council. Page 7of8 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SUBJECT: Naming of Public Facilities; Policy No. 400-10 Memorial Tree Plantings Page No. 2 of 2 Memorial Tree Plantings Requests for a memorial tree planting shall be reviewed by the Community Services Department with a recommendation being transmitted to the City Council for approval. The Council will allow memorial tree plantings under the following conditions: (i) Trees will be planted within existing park facilities, in compliance with approved park plans. (ii) The type of trees requested has been selected from the existing approved landscape guidelines. (iii) Plaques are encouraged. The provisions of this policy shall not apply to commitments made prior to September 12, 2006. HISTORY Adopted by 6/14/94 Revised By Resolution No. 2006-152 9/12/06 Page 8 of 8 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF City Council � � Redevelopment Agency n A i DEPARTMENT: CONSENT: APPEAL BUSINESS: RESOLUTION: F-1 ORDINANCES F-1 PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: ElReport emailed to Clerk CA Other E aa■ ■aaaa aa■ ■aa■ ■aa N aaa aaa ■ ala as aaaaaaaa aaa ■a a a a 0 w aaa a,a, a/+aa a r a a aaa��w as % UP DIRECTION: + `'�ftjtA- FOLLOW v l� ■ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I Submitted by: Approved by: Department Hi Finance Direct City Manager: Date: Date: 6 I" Date: Date: �� CITY OF TT LA Co�,LSIAOKE RLAM EXTREME REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: VIRGINIA J. BLOOM AGENCY CKERK DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. MQr_uccinn The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of August 13, 2013 Prepared by: Diana Gutierrez Co� Deputy Agency Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom Agency Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates Executive Director AGENDA ITEM NO. SA -2 Page 1 of 5 Page 2 of 5 MINUTES SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REGULAR MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE EVMWD BOARDROOM, 31315 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2013 ...................................................................................................................... CALL TO ORDER 6:00 P.M. Chairman Magee called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Magee Vice -Chair Johnson Agency Member Manos Agency Member Tisdale ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman Also present: Executive Director Yates, Legal Counsel Leibold, and Agency Clerk Bloom. PUBLIC COMMENT None SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION (SAI) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN #373-210-030 Agency negotiator: Executive Director Yates and Agency Counsel Leibold Negotiating parties: Successor Agency and Civic Partners Elsinore, LLC Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment Legal Counsel Leibold announced that the Successor Agency would be meeting in Closed Session to discuss Agenda Item No. (SA1). The Successor Agency recessed to Closed Session at 6:01 p.m. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. — EVMWD Boardroom, 31315 Chaney St., Lake Elsinore Chairman Magee reconvened the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Page 3 of 5 Successor Agency Minutes Regular Meeting of August 13, 2013 Page 2 of 3 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Magee Vice -Chair Johnson Agency Member Manos Agency Member Tisdale ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman Also present: Executive Director Yates, Legal Counsel Leibold, Agency Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Director Riley, Community Development Director Taylor, Planning Manager MacHott, Lake, Parks, and Recreation Director Kilroy, Public Works Director Seumalo, Police Chief Kennedy -Smith, Fire Chief Barr, and Deputy City Clerk Gutierrez. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Legal Counsel Leibold announced that the Successor Agency met in Closed Session to discuss Agenda Item No. (SAI) and that there was no reportable action taken. PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS None PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE None CONSENT CALENDAR (SA2) Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve the Minutes of the Regular Successor Agency Meeting of August 13, 2013. (SA3) Warrant List dated August 15 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated August 15, 2013. (SA4) Investment Report for the Month of July 2013 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file report. Motion by Agency Member Tisdale, seconded by Agency Member Manos, to approve the Consent Calendar, passed by unanimous vote. Page 4 of 5 Successor Agency Minutes Regular Meeting of August 13, 2013 Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING(S) None APPEAL(S) None BUSINESS ITEM(S) None PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES None EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS None AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS Ip row ADJOURNMENT The Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore adjourned this meeting at 8:52 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, August 27, 2013. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at City Hall and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. at the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Boardroom located at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Robert E. Magee, Chairman Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk Page 5 of 5 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF ElCity Council Redevelopment Agency DEPARTMENT:-� CONSENT: El APPEAL _ BUSINESS: Other RESOLUTION: F-1 ORDINANCES PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS:��IL"M/1 Report emailed to Clerk l ■ ■ ■ ■ R ■ ■ a ■ ■ R ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ f ■ ■ R ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ R a R ■ a a ■ a ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ R ■ R a a a a ■ ■ a ■ R ■ ■ a ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ a ■ a a a a a ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ 1 J Submitted by: 4' Date: Approved by: Department He- 11• Finance Direct4 City Manager: Date: Date: 7 Date: �� j CITY OF r LAKE V LSIRO E 7� TM DREAM EXTREME i` REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE AGENCY CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: GRANT YATES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: AUGUST 27, 2013 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED AUGUST 15, 2013 Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated August 15, 2013 Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued by the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore since the prior Warrant List. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II ` Reviewed By: James R. Riley Director of Admin strative Services Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 8-15-2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. SA -3 Page 1 of 4 Page 2 of 4 A'LJG US'lI' 15, 20113 wARRAW SUMMARY SUCCESSOR AGENCY O ",CHILE REDIEVIEILC911'M1EN'T AGENCY OF THIJE CJI`7C'Y OF LAKE ELSI1' ORE FUND# FUND DESCRIVI ION TOTAL 510 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 1 $ 3,600.00 520 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 2 2,560.00 530 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 3 2,559.97 540 SUCCESSOR STADIUM CAPITAL 2,980.84 GRAND TOTAL $ 11,700.81 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 1 of 1 Page 3 of 4 AUGUST115, 20113 WARRANT 1AS'11' SiUC10ES OR AGENCY OF 1,1-111E RT,"DE'VIELO1111MEN']f AGENCY OFTHI'E CITY OF ]LAKE IE I.,S II MOR E Cl-IECK# V'LNDDR NAME AMOUNT 7169 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN _ $ 8,719.97 7170 DIAMOND STADIUM GROUP, INC. 2,980.84 WARRANT TOTAL 11,700.81 GRAND TOTAL $ 11,700.81 8/20/2013 Warrant 08 15 13 1 of 1 Page 4 of 4 AGENDA COVER SHEET MEETING OF D 7 aD l City Council Redevelopment Agency F-1 Other DEPARTMENT: �_�, n s1, -g -n 5,r�R LES n N �E– Dw l s i bo CONSENT: APPEAL _ BUSINESS: F1 RESOLUTION: F71 ORDINANCES F—] PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENTS: 1zReport emailcd to Clerk Qc�)I -:�:) 0 0 a a a a a 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 E a 0 a■■. a E a a a a a 0 0 0 w a a a a w a 5 5 0 0 a 0 a 5 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 1 FOLLOW UP DIRECTION: ■ a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a. a 0 0 w w. w .. a 0 a 0 0 a 0 0. a a 0 .. a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 w a w .. • a 0.. a a a a a 0 a 0 0 .. 0 1 Submitted by: 7 Date: Approved by: Department He Finance Directs City Manager: Date: `3 — ( 3 -- l Date: `� - ( -?— Date: �-/3L ///) CITY OF isn FAKE LsIIoRE D€ZEAM EXTREME. REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE AGENCY CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: GRANT M. YATES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: August 27, 2013 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT -- JULY 2013 Recommendation Receive and file. Discussion The Investment Report is a listing of all funds invested for the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore as of the date shown on the report. Prepared By: Nancy L. Lassey �61 Finance Administrator Reviewed By: James R. Riley A/ Director of Adminikkative Services Approved By: Grant M. Yates Executive Director Attachments: Investment Report for July 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. SA -4 Page 1 of 34 Page 2 oi' 34 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS AS OF JULY 31, 2013 INVESTMENTS BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANG. BOOK ACTIVE ACCOUNTS BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE Bank of America- Successor Agency General $91,139.29 0.00 (55,500.00) 35,639.29 Bank of America - Housing Fund 250,454.86 0.00 0.00 250,454.86 Total Active Accounts 341,594.15 0.00 (55,500.00) 286,094.15 INVESTMENTS Successor: Successor Local Agency Investment Fund 12,019,601.08 - - 12,019,601.08 Successor CAMP Pool Account 72,395.62 - - 72,395.62 Successor U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes 1,861,418.08 - - 1,861,418.08 Successor Federal Agency Bond / Notes 1,624,007.65 - - 1,624,007.65 Successor Corporate Notes 1,567,332.75 - - 1,567,332,75 Housing. Housing CAMP Pool Account 25,859.21 - - 25,859.21 Housing U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes 1,200,617.29 - - 1,200,617.29 Housing Federal Agency Bond / Notes 2,200,779.40 - - 2,200,779,40 Housing Corporate Notes 1,490,465.45 - - 1,490,465.45 Sub -total Investments 22,062,476.53 - - 22,062,476.53 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (LAIF SUC) 5,613.05 - - 5,613.05 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (CAMP SUC) 117,865.57 117,865.57 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (CAMP HSNG) 56,395.57 - - 56,395.57 Unrealized Gain/ (Loss) at 6-30-12 per GASB 31 (Total) 179,874.19 179,874.19 Total Investments 22,242,350.72 - - 22,242,350.72 22,583,944.87 (55,500.00) 22,528,444.87 TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS 22,528,444.87 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency on December 11, 2012. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. James R Rilev August 13, 2013 Director of Administrative Services Date Prepared by: N, Lassey, finance Administrator Page 3 of 34 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND TRANSACTION SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2013 Interest Rate Purchase Date Maturity Rate 0.267% Daily 24 -Hour Beginning Balance Net Increase/Decrease Ending Balance $ 12,015,948.18 $ 3,652.90 $ 12,019,601.08 Page 4 of 34 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND AS OF JULY 31, 2013 FUND NAME Area I Area 11 Area III Housing Stadium Lease Trust Fund Total Pooled Cash & Investments AMOUNT $6,418,311.40 6,637, 544.02 2,589,643.44 6,661, 243.73 221.702.28 $ 22,528,444.87 Page 5 of 34 SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2013 DIVERSIFICATION MAXIMUM TYPES OF SECURITIES PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE U.S. Treasury Bills 0.00% UNLIMITED U.S. Treasury Bond / Notes 13.88% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 3,062,035.37 Federal Agency Bond / Notes 17.34% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 3,824,787.05 Banker's Acceptances 0.00% 40.00% Certificates of Deposit 0.00% 25.00% Negotiable Certificates of Deposits 0.00% 30.00% Commercial Paper 0.00% 15.00% Medium Term Corporate Notes 13.86% 30.00% Current Balance $ 3,057,798.20 Repurchase Agreements 0.00% UNLIMITED Reverse Repurchase Agreements 0.00% 20.00% LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) 54.48% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 12,019,601.08 CAMP -Pooled Sweep Account 0.45% UNLIMITED Current Balance $ 98,254.83 TOTAL $ 22,062,476.53 100.00% Note: Local agencies are only eligible to purchase medium term corporate notes that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation (S & P) If a security falls below "A" by both rating agencies, then PFM Asset Management LLC will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. The CAMP Portfolio Summary and Statistics shows the credit quality held by the City's investments. *No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies. *Totals include Housing Investments. Page 6 of 34 CITY OF LADE LLSINORE � 51�04 DREAM EXTREMEM Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency CAMP Account Page 7 of 34 Q� Ol ry O O Ip M m m o r! N v n C Im Page 8 of 34 M E Sc v > c m m m a N O � E B m c o v� s C Im Page 8 of 34 M E 0 u i c � a u i c � i c a c o O 'u v I Z'u`i 8a 1%za pp O O O O N O W O O m In N L!1 O O O M Vl p• N N O n cri N C ti N a O O N Obi l0/1 W M V N Ol N •'� ~ M O^ b fV •-I M Ill O ui I a I � i i i I i I i m N Vo o p o n m t h N Vl O t/1 p N N O kc� C� M Cl m n M D C Co N p^pll .p -I N .-� OOi ON .7 Q� N 4 CJ m n a o; A ~ 6 teak �t i o an U� V R• I N N rl O a E o�o E I V T a c ' � H A d v O O N Ol 46 N Va y t� � v� � •�.+ v ILEI ;; n > Hc' pE z S d E 8 10 vl V L N m O VI VI Z C 'c 'cE at o F 6_ rt E u ��uii d�iui a c c o ¢ ¢ poo Yn 'uou��+ nrn N E G N Y^ d z a• O' a` d` V u ro m' VI N N c L o G C O 9C 9 �% i -C+ J d f W W a a d J J J Page 9 of 34 r� ro b I M O o �n vi 0 0 0 0 O W h O p ry 0 I M 01 Ol M o o u1 I u1 I i E 0 u i c � a u i c � i c a c o O 'u v I Z'u`i 8a 1%za pp O O O O N O W O O m In N L!1 O O O M Vl p• N N O n cri N C ti N a O O N Obi l0/1 W M V N Ol N •'� ~ M O^ b fV •-I M Ill O ui I a I � i i i I i I i m N Vo o p o n m t h N Vl O t/1 p N N O kc� C� M Cl m n M D C Co N p^pll .p -I N .-� OOi ON .7 Q� N 4 CJ m n a o; A ~ 6 teak �t i o an U� V R• I N N rl O a E o�o E I V T a c ' � H A d v O O N Ol 46 N Va y t� � v� � •�.+ v ILEI ;; n > Hc' pE z S d E 8 10 vl V L N m O VI VI Z C 'c 'cE at o F 6_ rt E u ��uii d�iui a c c o ¢ ¢ poo Yn 'uou��+ nrn N E G N Y^ d z a• O' a` d` V u ro m' VI N N c L o G C O 9C 9 �% i -C+ J d f W W a a d J J J Page 9 of 34 r� ro � M O e o tJ O a• O H I W O N O N N N iF O 4 ui ui i o o O O O N N O m C • o N ui ti .ti ri tD �O A O� M O v v ui A � M F O 0 Z a CO O yl F J N Z v rn a R� vap rqq�. � 0 O Mo Ci M ni tY O R M N tl1 N �O O O O O O M �/1 It1 W W v1 O W ' Mn n N W �O M M IA O .i O� �t1 M I� v1 ti M N b N O r W L' r, O� W W i" O D• N N ` N T �D �+'t � n O M O z r P 0 r r O O 6 Z V O V p a w u o,$+ 00 O O u F. V d 0 p z p W d1 V lL O V h F- QV z O a f w Z� O O G O¢ f p$ O tw- w J O O¢¢ D Z w �JZYa�9zow uo0o�� 7d x 0¢ 0 O 0 0 F Page ll of 34 L7 �:O M O O] Vl I� p Ill M M D\ OpJ P O O N n N O W M O W N Vt N pl .Y .i O M P IO ro .Pi N 4 f� M Vl VOi N d � nW o ry Lr! vi a� W rn o b VY ti P co o 0 n m 0 V1 � a� m ry N p m of .ti N d c O IO 1� I� OI n n vl N O M IO h n n Ip p� OJ O N IO h M O V H OJ P OI N ' n N OI N O] �O OJ I(1 h 1'rj � W OI n a OI b O Yl O^ -I b O .M -i M P tD P P vl V M 10 ..i ti � M � P N Vti' O O � ~N M M M + Y O O O O O Vl N19 M Ol M V y- 0 W O O a N OJ O O OI OI �D OI N N P 01 O �O V W OI h ID a N M IO L U pl M W N O vl M I� N n M vO�I r ti ti .y i rn O O O •+ 6 O ti O O P O ti O C S E N ¢ N m Q N mm m 4 m 4 m Q m 4 N N ¢ la Q �N�oo Q cd '43 �C9 s s o s s s s s$ o s s s s a a O o P 0 O 0 O 0 p 0 p 0 P 6 P 0 O 0 c o P g a P s p P a P o P P o o O P a P o o 1 o vi m ui W � o � rz N M � ti N H N y- N P N N S 2:z Z 2 Z i tM/1 Vml X xOx a (O'J � d 6 m co ro w o m co ro m o o 6] OJ OJ W W OJ N W W In vl � IA Q.i = N N N N N N N NI M MN M ti h U O� O� OI OI .N -I Q. OI 0, O1 Ol M M M M G bA M V O Z N p p O In o O O Vl Vf f M o J O z,^ z."-I z z.N, r o > a r o r o r o r o r P r o r o & 9 (� O NOOp pO � pOo � p pO pO � pOo pOp �� pOp `_ U pOp � pOp ww NOp ti qUp Page 12 of 34 K7 .i S W Ol {{ M W W I�N lM0 W 01 ti N b c y O V �O pQ O W O OJ l0 Oi u1 O O E ,'j� O M N ID !f N 01 O a M n u1 I� u Ili H O O O O ti O V W a MIll V1 O U Oi O M � m V R OO Ol U N Y O� c OJ O 1� ti 10 h. Vl O Ol N N � O a m CO W Vl l0 V .Fi M M .Ni N n ro m W N W ti � Q M 0 FV V N N vl H OJ T N% O N O O N ti A O N iy N V S O S d I,� O N T t0 M WI� O 4 O V N V Of O n N m r m o Ili m V In 'v U ai o ri of � p v o m o� In b (� N UJ H .N-, N r -I N eMY ti .M-1 N N ti H Y ~ O O O O 4 O O O O O 4 O N .M-1 .N-� H .Mi ti Mi .Mi M ti .Ni eryi M r C) ry O� V1 VI N V"1 1� n N h. l0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O VI OI C E� aa ¢¢ ¢¢ qq ¢¢ ¢ QQ QQ on O Q 4 Q 4 Q Q q Q 4 G N o S S S O S o S S S o o S jp O o O O 0 O UO O OO O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O ILo 0 0 $ o 0 o G o 0 0 0 0 o vi o vi vi o 0 0 0 �+i o " U 4 N W ? J4O Q j {VM/� y 11QJ Y C O O O 6 1�1 h U m m 2 T O ll1 IIY Vl N M � h G N N N `� br. y N I� N 6 O O QjQ N O Q O O Z O O O O Q \ 4 W M In vl _ J N O vl a 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O V O d O YZ O 2 O _ O O Oe oa os oo oo Co Kp a So o z0 C Z O z In z ill Z In F V In 0. O� d o n' In � o o p o G u < ¢ n o n n nNi \ I ¢ w ¢ m � m .lf � � wU O p, a; O � OV QU ry yy 4 d o W o z Page 13 of 34 l Y U 0 0 m W in Y J U a V a) Im A C m n yy va N O ry �O N O N N N N a N Y 7 o m m .�6 ri In n N w M N ul � M M o In dl n � Iii M N V a ul m o w o of .-i a ui vi N b c W N I� M O Ip m N N V1 O Ill O O h O }� O 0 p 1lO� O1 Ifl Ifl Q E d In m o d ^I b dT' N Ymf N 6 O N UI N N M cY n M O O '1 O O d ICi vi Iri e m m M N ti 0O G 'N oN o 0 o n M q ti C' rvi m m o N OC UI ? OI O N cli in n O m m N M 01 Ill C7 n M N Q N V OOi Vii W b YN1 ry n N Ill O N N IA YI LF NMi Mi .Mi .M+ rMr Q O O \ O N N o ` N O y c 'Q M N Mryry .4 d. f � g m o O o O p O O N N � O O tp N 1p C o O0 0 0 � O' vi ul ul a o 0 8 0 o O O m m th O G M VI Ol O w v ui w bf. 5 tC go 00o o� 3 v .� n Y ow o m o 0 0 o a g o 0 0 0 0 0 m w H h g q 'J y jLN� l° - Page 14 of 34 -7 m yp m ry m V U W �O N ti M 0 M c O N N ti CO n � VOt M W O fN,I M N N p d O m W O m W I/1 N O � 6 O Z Y m L7 m N I[mnp� K K u m 5 a m 5 K m O O u m 0 F' N M tN+t V' p p ID O m 0 O o N s o p a O ti o O O 0 O O 0 O m 0 o O M M rj N A N p O n ^ m O O O 6 q m to V N I m �p M M M C O V N N ti H O M� T O p o a o o m m M p p a{ O M vl c o 0 o S s s 0 0 0 0 o a g 0 rt 7 4J N v � � C voi vii vii H N ti H N ti C1 M M M M M M v bJJ O H C O ti N oN ry oM ry q Y N m V1 VI M m I O O O F F O 6 u a o 2 o O � Z W + O 2 N !V N N M M y G 'D T N O W N f EMi E O II O IZL. Page 15 of 34 E W � N Y V O v o e E � a -7 m yp m ry m V U W �O N ti M 0 M c O N N ti CO n � VOt M W O fN,I M N N p d O m W O m W I/1 N O � 6 O Z Y m L7 m N I[mnp� K K u m 5 a m 5 K m O O u m 0 0 s o s s s s s 0 N 0 O o N s o p a O ti o O O 0 O O 0 O m 0 o O M M rj N N N p E Z Z a O N N N N N N N N N U m a, m rn rn rn rn rn m L 40 vI IA M to O b m IO � m C+ O I m m O O N M v L C r ti ax F F ZoZoZoZ Z�Z�Z�Z�Zc O N O C O O N O1 N 0 p; 40 m Q m C+ O I m m O O N M v ti {} N Ll OI OJ 01 O N N O O N O1 N 0 p; .i Vy N urvi O m N O+ C O N o Q M rj N ro � o r.i vi n p M � m n ti eNn O n ^ m O O O 6 q m to V N I m �p M M {!1 0• -i N N M M LQm IR M V N N ti H O M� o a o o m m J d d J a c a l0 t�7 u c o 0 o S s s 0 0 0 0 o a g 0 4J N v � � voi vii vii H N ti H N ti C1 M M M M M M v bJJ O ti N oN ry oM ry q Y N m V1 VI M m I O O O F F O 6 u a o 2 o O � Z 2 jLJ. T N O W N f EMi E O II O IZL. Page 15 of 34 1i M b Oh W h (ASS ¢ O V O M O m u W C O ti M C � M m P �O S� 1P O w � M M M M tO O N I/1 rn a « O S vi O O o C O S o O O ca O O ui 'O W w C Z O v v o 6 �n O S o C & 4 E W D O1 N r N H N C ti F �a 1i Y u N d {Vx m N Z Y Q m a y 7 U Fm ■ M M w roy P o h o P P H e e ro m �o ■ .r �n .. h o do o .-� o h b v1 v1 ti h O P N h O I� h b vt h N O� � Vl of M W CO O� OJ �D Lip W M h lO N I(t W m m rn m m p� N h q' tp h P ✓1 M W T V 9 M b Oh W h (ASS ¢ O V O M O 3 m u W C O vI 4'1 V7 M m P �O h h M Ul M 01 O M M M M tO O N I/1 Q O O vi O S vi O O o O O 0 O S o O O ca O O ui O O o O O �i O S o Y u N d {Vx m N Z Y Q m a y 7 U Fm ■ M M w roy P o h o P P H e e ro m �o ■ .r �n .. h o do o .-� o h b v1 v1 ti h O P N h O I� h b vt h N O� � Vl of M W CO O� OJ �D Lip W M h lO N I(t W m m rn m m p� N h q' tp h P ✓1 M W T V 9 M b Oh W h N ¢ b N ti M O 3 m N m m vI 4'1 V7 M m P �O h h M Ul M 01 O M M M M tO O N I/1 Q O O vi O S vi O O o O O 0 O S o O O ca O O ui O O o O O �i O S o O O o o 6 �n O S o N H ti m m m rn o o m m co m o o h m is rn � m n m e rn vi rn o: rn 1µ/l ` N N ti a ti N ti N O O O op O � iry O O in in UoO O O O p w0o 00 Z0 O UI Oo z o g 00 0 O0o J C` V S O o mo N O U I(1 N Vl O VI O O z O i- � z N 6 N 1 N� .h-� W ti a N �My ti O d N� 0 ❑ i-- o� 0 3 0 3' o� o m o m o m o f m u o Q o� c Page 16 of 3 71 w K 5 �d LL i GiG J ¢ f o J F o 3 m S' S O U O S S O S S O S O S Q O O vi O S vi O O o O O 0 O S o O O ca O O ui O O o O O �i O S o O O o o 6 �n O S o N H 1µ/l ` N N ti a ti N ti N O O O op O � iry O O in in UoO O O O p w0o 00 Z0 O UI Oo z o g 00 0 O0o J C` V S O o mo N O U I(1 N Vl O VI O O z O i- � z N 6 N 1 N� .h-� W ti a N �My ti O d N� 0 ❑ i-- o� 0 3 0 3' o� o m o m o m o f m u o Q o� c Page 16 of 3 71 :l a �. 3 o m 0 a a n O rj a o Let o O Yni, o n uni O O b O Yat, p b yaj a �. 3 o m 0 0 O rj b Let O � O n O O b b N N b m N M eYya}t� p N b M W O p O 0 b a� Ic 0 h Page 17 of 34 mi O r p 0 0 0 R O O O 1p O N W N u 0 0 rn M m M n O o D M M N C o 0 n a O N 0 C r n LL G o Z c O 2 K o ¢ O a OUrn Ci O •� pn o N ri a OpC) N 000 m rtt' � as a v d w o ✓� c C q V lW'l qC F H d d .Mr O S � W N O O O O O O O N H H m ti ti H M O r p 0 0 0 R O O O 1p O N W N u 0 0 rn M m M n O o D M M N C o 0 n a O N 0 C r O J ` u G o Z c O 2 K o ¢ O a OUrn Ci O •� pn o N ri a OpC) N 000 U o O c rtt' � as a v d w o ✓� c F� w N lW'l qC F H d d .Mr O S � W N O O O O O O O N H H m ti ti H M O F H o 0 O r p 0 0 0 R O O O 1p O N W N u 0 0 rn M m M n O o D M M N C o 0 o a o 0 0 O p O O O O O a p Ci O O Ci o N ri a OpC) N 000 ,., z� N rPi N N '1 N 6 N qC F 6 O O 4 O S � W N O O O O O O O N H H m ti ti H M 0 0 o a o 0 N N N N VF O O 0 0 0 0 g o 0 a o g O o 0 0 0 0 0 O N ON QN ~ d M ti N 0 0 p ri J J of V � u U 0 •i N M o M io ti u N 0 0 0 0 o c 4r °pd N n r r O O O O O C b b n �� m N ri a OpC) N 000 ,., z� N rPi N N '1 N 6 N qC F 6 O O 4 O S � W ~ O O O O O O O N H H m ti ti H M 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o0 0 ri J J of V � u U 0 •i N a a N p U 4r °pd N �7aV b b n o? m N ri a e � N N rPi N N '1 N 6 N qC F 6 O O 4 O S � W uNi u� O, o0 0 ri ro o of V � N 0 •i N O N u� O, o0 0 A o p � O of o 0 N 0 p g S 0 o p � O of o 0 S a' 0 r ti N p U 4r °pd N I ' 0 N M M ro M U ro o p � O of V1 Z U o 1^ O J C 0 Io m p o O r z n � m p U 4r °pd N �7aV N moss d N h .N+ N ~ C O O .a 6 N qC F 6 O N I ' 0 N M M ro m ro of O o r m m N N M N 11 O 4 O N H N N N N N VF O O a N 0 F Pa€ 0 F e If of 34 IN C E w 41 49 c O v v Q Page 19 of 34 M M M •+ 1l1 to Ln t/1 M M N N h t1f LLI n N T n U G Oi V ut d- m W 7 T ut WL m vi �n .-� �'Y N m (Ii �D Ot M C M m M O1 M m 00 � l�A N O t0 JC O i3 6 C C O O O p O O II1 O O N O O O O O O � N �/1 OJ N O l!1 N O O n M aS q C N Q• O O D\ N M M ri � � v O w. D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 O O O O O O O O O O O O yQ '} G S '1 H ri ri '-I N H ri rl •-I rl rl rl N N 'i N N H N :C W N 0 { a U o o ,1n O O O O O O O y� O O O O O ,3O ,QO m 0 0 0 N o 0 0 0 O N N N N .9 N N N N 10 f0 S S S S S c o S S c > S � U °O 'O °O 'O l! 6 M y 3� 6 N vii m vii m vii m vii m vOi m E N N u�i u0i t� io Gdd M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ;zz' .=� 1 . i O O .i .i .i .-� N N N N N N M M m M �y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O yt �r N r44 MI 9 N Ol rl N N ry ri rl r-: rl r-1 H r -I e-1 N rl '1 ^1 IIIIII ~� •� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 Page 19 of 34 ROE C d 2 c c �R2 Q 11N c U R C N m W c O � t O N C M SS n n 1N0 M L6 N 0 m N n Page 20 of 34 m CITY OF LADE LSINOIJE ���M DREAM EXTREME. Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency Housing Fund CAMP Account Page 21 of 34 1 M W N O N m O p o w � rvi M ri N W ! c C a m m N o o tj m m n in o o N N M n O O Qj ti O m M N O ry O p N 6 Page 22 of 34 C Cd E 71 .N m m m E E a C 7 u Q d 01 m C m 9 6 O N O 01 M 00 .J Vat L W. O O O O N et O O o o Yn00 M N in o No 0 N p O n O ^ � O V Oa > N a � yWy N ` N y !L 4 m a�'n rna ti m � O v N N v 8j N �O O Oi N N in o No 0 p' O rvt O O vl O � V > N a � Y ` 2 !L 4 m a�'n rna ti O O O o in �n O p o 0 N p' O rvt O O vl O � V ti C m a ti O v N N O �O C 8 u N E 0 u _c v v o_ g c pp c .Ti a c v m a m �i�pnp ?n c ' O ��o V j £ N U d o 7 0 0 o O h h 0 v1 vt C b l � O OJ N O N n O N ti -t N N V W I lc r" Ya] c m ri m O UN,F R V, m n in o o co :n o �p CR O n ON O O .-1 O a• M N, 'C r- o v m � voi N o M o voi � a" � v n v y E T 76 tr a cz W ryN In L as' V U1 N U t0 v W p ° N H S m c E f :° E S O h1 L dz N U N UI O C G 4 4 uo a Yii 'm .o b V u goo 9uaNMCW w a F w w a d n Page 23 of 34 v z a N ti C N V N uoi n c 0 a O Q 0 0 Page 24 of 34 Y. .i 0 O� O M S T T. �' m O M Mm � N N O Vt .-i Q� O ti 0 0 Vt O N N Vl N '+ M O ul ti +-1 V N N N ti N ti V N ul �O N 01 OJ M V W �D M 1� M O V1 V1 OJ W N Vl V) .i �p O t0 O h V W OJ d' O V1 b ti ti z r 0 ad r V O uO V O K ama o -Z. y V W Or a O ��Z VHF"' 3 O z sj u n o O V w Q a H a =O � W O K lU o Q 4 p O K Z y z a zZ 0 0 0 3 p ¢ Q E= p u� z w 0 r - Page 25 of 34 FI 0 5 iW 1� N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b O of z of Z a a p p. N O N E E F z 1N s a % o V, p O N O N O N O !d ` �' O O V rn m m dl0 m m M N 1 W \ O m N N Pi n O v V' O O W IO CO V1 N O O N 4 O O E G N M Q QT < a � a O O O O O u a rn m n rn y O 4 d� c 0 G M o O N s $ Q H 6 N M o d O O 4 O O O O O v N m N o M o O vi N o O 0 4 d pO p4 pO pO pO pO p N VI 1- sg r' 4 M N Oq OO h OI O a? N m m v oq w c •� u � � N N CO M O, N QO+ N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b O of z of Z a a p p. N O N E E F z z 4 o V, p O N O N O N O �➢ O �' O O V rn m m a, m m m O Y ` 10 N N \ O m N N M O O 4 O O O r b � N O O N 4 O O g q G 4 Q Q QT < Q � a O O O O O ti O rn Page 26 of 34 c 0 G M o O N s $ o 6 s 6 o d O O 4 O O O O O v N m N o M o O vi N o O 0 4 N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b O of z of Z a a p p. N O N E E F z z 4 o Vl = m N w N m N w N m N m N ro N V rn m m a, m m m m O 14(1 u; m ^� ti M Cl M In N 1!1 Vl V1 b r O N O O N 4 O O G A C i N N M M M OM �• 0 O O O O O ti O Page 26 of 34 c 0 G M o O N F- g o s s s G O O z 00- z z o o O O O r o r o r o Y o r r o r o y pO p4 pO pO pO pO p N VI 1- sg N N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b � O N O O ti O N Ipl1 W O C M N 4 o p. lA N V IO N CO p0 V H O V41 O O t/bt VI 4!i m O m O 14(1 u; m ^� ti M Cl O+ Ol M b of O ti M N �y V ti dM' N O N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b � O N N � ti O N O N O N O C N O 4 o o 0 0 M N I~J CO p0 V H O V41 O O t/bt VI 4!i m O m O 14(1 u; ^� ti M Cl O+ Ol M b of O �i M N �y V ti dM' N O N V' IMS M bhp O 1p O yMj n y�j O M b n a � d' N N � ti O N O N O N O N C C In o o 0 0 M N I~J CO p0 V H O V41 O O t/bt VI 4!i m O m O 14(1 u; ^� ti M Cl O+ Ol M b of O O1 M N �y V ti dM' N O O O Om O H Su O O {/) LL 0 n a � d' N N � ti O N O N O N O N In �n C In o o m M N I~J CO W T O+ W 4 O O O O O O VI 4!i m O m O 14(1 Yt �C �C 0 '��N 0 T Y"•,. F� ZaQ�L$ O4 O O O Om O a O Su O O {/) LL 0 LL LL lL 0E LL O rOV Page 26 of 34 g o s s s s s O O O O 0• O O O O O pO O O H N n a � d' In In In ti O N O N O N O N In �n vi In n n M M M M M M J: rp w ay d' In In In ti O N O N O N O N O N O N N N O p O O N 0 N 0 W 4 W 0 O1 0 O. 0 Vl � VI 4!i m O m O 14(1 Yt �C �C 0 '��N 0 T Y"•,. F� ZaQ�L$ U QJV1 Q O O O a O Su O O {/) LL 0 LL LL lL 0E LL O Page 26 of 34 J: rp w l �7 O OM b O ^• M �O M1 V W ti IR N a d N DJ .i lD N O tl� ryMm� m ti N rn p o rn o o e m v T n O p M1 ti O W LQ VMi pOO W Oni O � V' M BOO OJ M O� N •+ n Ih E ,Q N N N F U m o o C o 0 0 N o a n v g o g n C +vv'rr m n m vi m m 01 W n o BOO ei n .+ v o vi v v N Ilio IQ V Oy m m w m rnN. m po v ry v h o o m o vi w w vi n N N � .Mr ti M ti ti ti M N M N N N N N O M N N N N ti ti OM d O O O O O O O O nN- O GI ti eNi ti ti rMi M. M .N-� N Ni Ni Ni O O O O O O O O O 9 C 8 Iqp Q N Q� N 4 N N N 4 Q N Q N Q N Q N Q E m [y Y Q < Q Q + Q q N � A o 0 0 0 o 0 c 0 p o 0 0 0 o 0 G 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O vt O N 1+1 N O O M N Vt vt m ti ti n o 0 0 o O Z o o z �+o p 000 r O mO o N 0 C OM N N N m N ry .ni VN -i J H O O ti V O p'r a? M O O� V O vl 0 O In 0 O N O O of U O v n d O N O �. cs M �. g M O M 1U h a O a Z o O O o o 0 O o a e o U o u o � v di V Z O J O Vf J O Q O 6] O Z I!1 J n N Z J n W w M a O W O K W 00 U vl Q N H vl n M N In n M 6 V1 O O Q Q Q m 4 W 6 P V V ON F S y ly NO QF N LLJ ON N } ~ V NO Z Q N J W W NO \ K\ o N A H N ti N f ti ti (Z/I ti K O K O 0 O Z O Z O Q O Z O Z O O O O O O F O O D z Q O K ti yy_ LL i (� 0 WU' 'Y 'S t� uQ. ❑ u_ O uQ. 1- O O `moi ❑ Page 27 of 34 li 2 Page 28 of 34 M O M N N N n m m A E� rn rn LI; robro n o�0 b b N er m m w ro w w V S m o o o y OMO rev N O t7 O o vi rn a LQ v N M C w a� 0 QI Y n n .O .O . ti Li N T N � YI M O O N V b CO .Mi 01 10 41 Q w ri N ff NwrvV L l V O M O O O n N m H O R p O 9 o Vl L9 o O o N N N M �' o N W N m Op VI N OI ei VI Lr vbi m m Ln n o w n Q u o T � V Omi vii � N a N N H a m m w N O N N O O O O O O m m I` N T C a E � rn N N 4¢ Gq ¢ G O S S O S 9 O O O N N S O o O O O O 0 Vii m q o o g ao C n fVV aC w Z m n w m m m m ro O N ON N W N � O N N O C J V' 4 o Z O O O 0 W F N b6 H P OJ O O Z O O O N J o �V�1111I �IN�JJ \y A m �� o m l N C O N � c y a ti p � L ~ �>• 06' HO Z N d 9Ac p p p O O o W O p CI u p 2 � p p p p J ICO 5aa' O W Q p� Q Q O O O 6 Z 17) F UE6 u Page 28 of 34 M M \ y (7 ICS vl Vl N Leh} M m O V N Iq C v !2 w CO Y F��' N O ON n O N O m N M M CO of V P In tY. V O O O o 0 o OOi V y G z � M vi in in vi vi e r C O F O O N O O O f w w m M N N M M M c 0 0 0 o ti t YO in K K2' 00 �'N �o�oE�� m V1� S o > O> G Y o Y o Y 0 Y 0> C ll' y N O O P O OO O C {: s s s s s e{ s y O:4 fV rV C N m M O 3 0 S o 0 0 � rri o D M Q V o ed m m I!t N m W V' W h Vj H W I h M v Yy>rl � r` W V W .yD \ IMS, OR O O W v �rpp ay yOj p� VOt W O Q M ti O OMi ul � E O N N m b Q 0 r � a N \ y (7 ICS vl Vl N Leh} M m O V N Iq C v !2 w CO Y F��' N O ON n O N O m N M M CO of V P In tY. V O O O o 0 o OOi V y G z O W W POx rn = mN N N N N N U m m m m m m rn � M vi in in vi vi e r C O F O O N O O O f w w m M N N M M M c 0 0 0 o ti t YO in K K2' 00 �'N �o�oE�� m V1� S o > O> G Y o Y o Y 0 Y 0> C QylO O O O O C Q O O o 0 o O � � s rn s s s s s e{ s N fV rV C N S o 0 0 0C� y o Q V O W W POx rn = mN N N N N N U m m m m m m rn � M vi in in vi vi e r C O F O O N O O O f w O A C\ a O m M N N M M M c 0 0 0 o ti t V 9 o e e o 0 0 0 O U �'N �o�oE�� W u m [WFN�rQ1]1M Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O N Z r Qm > O> G Y o Y o Y 0 Y 0> C QylO O O O O C Q O O o 0 o O � � O O O O O O P O d N O rn vi u� 0 0 0 0 0 e{ O O N !V N fV rV C N a h Iq .o Iq 0 0 y Q V ed m m I!t N m W V' W h Vj H W I h r` O� v yOj p� VOt W O Q M ti O OMi ul O O N N m b Q 0 r N h h P T F� r� W F 0 o rn rn o o m s H n` n 0 0 0 0 V V z Q z a w Q K � K K iV. ILL p�p g s s s S o$ g s 0 o s o s o s s o 0 O O O 6 O O O O N O VI V1 O O N N v1 N ip W O ✓1 M m h N M o o z �¢J G M M M M m M m m iui fd O N O O O O O N y N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O o N I'; - O O 9 M �' O Q OO in m O OPO m O O O .h-'ni N NO �= N ON M NO Q R W.1 J O J O O O O O Z z Z W_ _ 2 Z U U po p� pop � lZL O lL L] LL D l=L O LL O LL D LL O Page 29 of 34 N c13 y G Ih vt N M G� W C P C tO vI vl N Ot �O A Oy O aQ+ d C 1^p PI 1f1 ^ N M M Vl N N m W C� W L W Q J 1 O+ �O N Ill l0 tD O O I� M CO N COO� . Q v1 n O O O F. (7 U M Ol O W y IO N M O+ QI Ni N N T kq ID V. N O \pO 0] O to N T h IO N M O O y y Q J O ti U m n n n h vmi m LM a bN m (7 ami N h b W M �O M 1t) VI P N M M O 7 y d N_ O M M �D 1p (� W W O O M lO h P N OJ M ID O N O l0 O l0 O N M V' O N N Ih N N Q� M M V Ol M M IO O n V1 M OJ ✓1 N 'I N �,I p O N P Vl P N N W OJ O O M O V1 O V1 O N Ol N N N Q E +, N Z � o 3 z 3 5 J cm a u E f o o m 9 O O m m E _ m t� m °. f O O O 6 O O O O p O O O O p p O O O p O O O p O O p O p O Oo Q p o o O o 0 0 o b o o b S O O O O O O O O O O O O PIR O O O O V1 ti O I(1 V1 O O N vl O M N N Vl Vl N O O O O P V1 N ~ N H � Uj., M M1l P 0> M N T Ol O P O V1 L m OO= Gpa ONNO NO mQ OVONl QJ OWON C O LL O ZO OONvl ZlYWO/'� ZOON O�Go 9 �g u uo°o QI V Z W Z h 4N p ~ 0 N,W OWN O NO O ry M m Q 00 O OO 9 W OU�0000S.N.� ,N.4�N+p.mi''.M,�.M+ O O O O lJ O � � p J v"�i o O W o o Vl d p W Z b N +� W O E W ;�'¢op¢ O~ O O O Z U O O� 0 p rv0��in O O O O r( all U O O K O 6 to E E0 Page 30 of 34 y u a Qi 13 L c� G L m LL 1✓ C 3 u U Q V d m m c m 2 w 1 W o Nm rn o w a � Z N M d Q r W? o O b 10 O O N o o c v Yt c v v m w e i O d d d a 0 o 0 9 0 0 i w D b \ ry I;q O N p C �a \ Ci m m 7i u O L M N N N � N n M W T h vl �qa V Y q O N Z w 1 W o Nm rn o w a � Z N M d Q r W? o O b N O O N a o c v Yt n � z ov�oZo 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 9 0 0 i a b w 1 W o Nm rn o w a � e ei a0 O M o O M W? o O b N O O N a o c v Yt m W0m FC �p- u) Page 31 of 34 Nm rn o w a � w Q m w m m n � z ov�oZo a 0 o 0 F� 'fin Q uo d l7 i O i U Q O U Q b FC �p- u) Page 31 of 34 RI, E § ■ � k� . Im 3� ) / 2 (\(\(} K \� . cs M !/ ^ �� J ) } } } § o B «� &. §.� c� u 2� z. (}Ull_ / \} � { °\ RI, E § ■ � ) / (\(\(} . ) } } } RI, E § ■ � Page 33 of 34 N H N O n N N N N O IIA pyN� v1 N -i W oc� oc Q P cr N !gyp O N O b c u u u Q C O 111 n O O o M r O N m N~ QV 7 O v N GO O a D O 0 0 0 0 0 90 g o o a o � u 0 0 0 0 0 w a m ,x 0 �^ a v O O O OO O O O a a 6 a a a z o v y p >> > a H E C •u t ' ' ' D n Y N N N ru fi .5 r fi bpi v w Mm G Mr M M M m M M M M M M E Y w 0 y N Y V C 44 N O Page 33 of 34 \ k � ■ � $\ 2\ ;R Page a«« K § B 2\\ # \\\6 \ ! k \� Ica e @ | � ! 00.22 ! ! Page a«« K § B ��ItitiI-:.11�1.1 WONIAN MELENDEZ 67 -iii Disi'Rici Le islative Update The last month has been a busy one in Sacramento. I had my first bill, AB 813, pass out of both the State Assembly and Senate and is now on its way to the Governor to hopefully be signed into law!! AB 813 will require Registrar of Voters in each county and the Secretary of State to post the certified statement of election results online in a downloadable spreadsheet format for public inspection to ensure elections are carried out with integrity and transparency. I also have three other bills working their way through the Senate: AB 526 will expand financial protections currently given to all military reservists and Guardsmen recalled to active duty in all assignments. Currently, the law applies only to those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill also adds utility payments to the list of obligations. This bill passed through the Assembly and will be heard in the Senate Appropriations Committee August 12`h. AB 939 will encourage all public schools to have and maintain an automatic external defibrillator (AED) and be able to solicit and receive non -state funds to acquire and maintain an AED. The bill will also protect the employees and school districts from civil damages resulting in the use of an AED. This bill has passed through the Assembly and will be heard in the Senate Appropriations Committee on August 12`h AB 681 will prevent alimony payments to former spouses who have physically or sexually abused their children. AB 681 was unanimously approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 2°a and will soon be heard on the Senate floor. AB 681 would require a court to consider domestic violence against a child when issuing an award of spousal support. I'm so pleased to have Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D- Berkeley) as a joint -author and to gain bi-partisan support for this important legislation. Last year, the Legislature worked across party lines to end payments to exes who abused their spouse. This legislation closes a loophole to end spousal support to those who abuse kids. AB 681 was inspired by the case of Corona resident Carol Abar, and her daughter. Carol's ex-husband raped her daughter over a 16 -year period. She filed for divorce and sought criminal charges against her ex when her daughter told her about the abuse, years later. View the CBS news coverage on AB 681 here: http://Iosaii,-,cles.cbslocal.com/video/90 i 8598-cbs2-reort-ins fres-le islation-that-would- rohibit-s ousal-su ort-iti-child-sex- abuse-cases/ I was excited to have my daughter, Sofia, come to work with me! She had the opportunity to be introduced on the Floor of the Assembly and see the people's work firsthand. Please visit my website for continuing updates from my District and Sacramento offices bttp://arc. asm.ca,gov/member/AD671 CITY OF� LAKE. LSITIORE EA TREME Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address ► l wish to address Agenda Item No Print Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) fy)Jn P,� ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) WWIA ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! LC ITY OF %�� ' LAKEC S1110P--,,—E-1 � L .EAM EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Organization Represented: Address ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. Please Print Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date re The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF, 4 LAKY 02, :i�,,LS1110RF ,!T> EAM EXTREME Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) t Plea rint Address 3 lnl o u4e.s Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of _meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) /T7 1-3 Date QL_ 4 , Sign ure The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized items" and will have approximately one (i) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! =L O N Cn Lp r - m cn z o z m 77 k �n n < �o �I >r d � i rm Z�z l�>O �z� r' tz7 r z d r r Y cn n r l ►� ;':� O >� Z [dam �crr t„ r r r V) i •� Z '� General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 Proposing 2014-2021 Housing Element and Land Use Element Amendments to District Plans Section of the General Plan initial Study / Negative Declaration No. 2013-01 Prepared for: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 CITY OF i/►c� r LAKELSII`�OKE L DREAM EXTREME Prepared by: MIG I Hogle-Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 Hogle-Ireland .lune 2013 f2-r—>so (u+t c+'] No. ,2013,E C xy), b; 4- a G � This document is c.ed for, Q'je-sided printing - Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................... ......................................................... -........................ 1.1 - Purpose of CEQA.......................................................................................1 1.2 - Public Comments.......................................................................................3 1.3- Availability of Materials..............................................................................3 1.4- Approach..................................................................................................3 2 Project Description...............................................................................................5 2.1 - Project Title..............................................................................................5 2.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address..................................................................5 2.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number..............................................................5 2.4 - Project Location.........................................................................................5 2.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address...........................................................5 2.6- General Plan Land Use Designation..............................................................5 2.7- Zoning District..........................................................................................6 2.8- Project Description.....................................................................................7 2.9 - Project Objectives.................................................................................... 16 2.10 - Surrounding Land Uses..........................................................................1.16 2.11 - Environmental Setting..............................................................................19 2.12- Required Approvals.................................................................................. 20 2.13 - Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required ......................................... 20 3 Determination....................................................................................................53 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .................................................. 53 3.2 - Determination......................................................................................... 53 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts.................................................................55 4.1 - Aesthetics......................................................................................I........ 55 4.2- Agriculture and Forest Resources............................................................... 57 4.3- Air Quality..............................................................................................59 4.4- Biological Resources................................................................................62 4.5 - Cultural Resources...................................................................................65 4.6 - Geology and Soils....................................................................................67 4.7 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................71 4.8- Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................. 77 4.9- Hydrology and Water Quality.................................................................... 81 4.10 - Land Use and Planning............................................................................. 85 4.11 - Mineral Resources....................................................................................87 4,12- Noise.....................................................................................................88 4.13 - Population and Housing............................................................................94 4.14- Public Services........................................................................................96 4.15- Recreation..............................................................................................98 4,16- Transportation and Traffic......................................................................... 99 4.17- Utilities and Service Systems..................................................................102 4.18- Mandatory Findings of Significance.......................................................... 105 5 References 107 5.1 - List of Preparers... I ......................... 5.2 - Notes ............................................ General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 i ..................................................... 107 ...................................................... 108 If Table of Contents List of Tables Table 2-1 Lake Elsinore RHNA...............................................................................9 Table 2-2 Focus Areas Summary.......................................................................... 10 Table 2-3 Focus Areas Land Inventory.................................................................. 11 Table 2-4 Focus Areas Surrounding Land Uses ....................................................... 17 Table 4.12.1 Human Response to Groundborne Vibration........................................90 Table 4.12.2 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Standards ....................................... 90 Table 4.12.3 Interior and Exterior Noise Standards ................................................ 91 Table 4.12.4 Common Construction Vibration........................................................92 List of Exhibits Exhibit2 Focus Area 1........................................................................................ 23 Exhibit3 Focus Area 2........................................................................................ 25 Exhibit4 Focus Area 3....................................................................................... 27 Exhibit5 Focus Area 4....................................................................................... 29 Exhibit6 Focus Area 5....................................................................................... 31 Exhibit7 Focus Area 6....................................................................................... 33 Exhibit8 Focus Area 7....................................................................................... 35 Exhibit9 Focus Area 8....................................................................................... 37 Exhibit 10 Focus Area 9..................................................................................... 39 Exhibit 11 Focus Area 10...................................................................................41 Exhibit 12 Focus Area II...................................................................................43 Exhibit 13 Focus Area 12...................................................................................45 Exhibit 14 Warm Springs Community..................................................................45 Exhibit 15 Lakeland Village Community................................................................49 Exhibit 16 Meadowbrook Community...................................................................51 Initial Study 1 Introduction The City of Lake Elsinore (Lead Agency) completed a draft Housing Element update to comply with State law requiring an update to the Housing Element to occur for the 2014-2021 planning period. In addition, the City is amending its District Plans Section of the General Plan to address three unincorporated communities (Lakeland Village, Meadowbrook, and Warm Springs) in order to comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10). The Housing Element and District Plan updates constitute a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.). This Initial Study has been prepared to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental impacts that could result from the proposed 2014-2021 Housing Element and District Plan Section amendments. This report has been prepared to comply with Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which sets forth the required contents of an Initial Study. These include: • A description of the project, including the location of the project (See Section 2); • Identification of the environmental setting (See Section 2.11); • Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries (See Section 4); • Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any (See Section 4); • Examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls (See Section 4.10); and • The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study (See Section 5). Purpose of CEQA The body of state law known as CEQA was originally enacted in 1970 and has been amended a number of times since then. The legislative intent of these regulations is established in Section 21000 of the California Public Resources Code, as follows: The Legislature finds and declares as follows: a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern. b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man. c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment of the natural resources of the state. d) The capacity of the environment is limited, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the government of the state take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds being reached. e) Every citizen has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. f) The interrelationship of policies and practices in the management of natural resources and waste disposal requires systematic and concerted efforts by public and private interests to enhance environmental quality and to control environmental pollution. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 1 Introduction g) It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state government which regulate activities of private individuals, corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the State to: a) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state. b) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise. c) Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man's activities, insure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities and examples of the major periods of California history. d) Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment, consistent with the provision of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions. e) Create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony to fulfill the social and economic requirements of present and future generations. f) Require governmental agencies at all levels to develop standards and procedures necessary to protect environmental quality. g) Require governmental agencies at all levels to consider qualitative factors as well as economic and technical factors and long-term benefits and costs, in addition to short-term benefits and costs and to consider alternatives to proposed actions affecting the environment. A concise statement of legislative policy, with respect to public agency consideration of projects for some form of approval, is found in Section 21002 of the Public Resources Code, quoted below: The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects, and that the procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects. The Legislature further finds and declares that in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof. 2 Initial Study Introduction 1.2 - Public Comments Comments from all agencies and individuals are invited regarding the information contained in this Initial Study. Such comments should explain any perceived deficiencies in the assessment of impacts, identify the information that is purportedly lacking in the Initial Study or indicate where the information may be found. All comments on the Initial Study are to be submitted to: Richard MacHott, Planning Manager City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 951-674-3124 x209 rmachott(d)lake-elsinore.org All comments received will be considered by the City of Lake Elsinore prior to adoption. 1.3 - Availability of Materials All materials related to the preparation of this Initial Study are available for public review. To request an appointment to review these materials, please contact: Richard MacHott, Planning Manager City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 951-674-3124 x209 1.4 - Approach The environmental analysis contained in this Initial Study is based on the following assumptions: 1. General Plan Consistency: The Housing Element is consistent with the land use policies and all other elements of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. As the General Plan is updated and/or amended, the City will ensure that such updates and amendments do not prevent implementation of the policies contained in the Housing Element. 2. Project Specific Environmental Review: In the City of Lake Elsinore, all housing development proposals that are considered "projects" under CEQA are subject to an environmental review process to determine the level of impact and to impose appropriate mitigation measures, if needed, to avoid significant impacts. 3. Purpose of Environmental Review: This project would not authorize any plans for construction of new homes or other land uses, or redevelopment of any properties to produce new homes or other land uses. No direct environmental impacts, therefore, would occur. This Initial Study is limited to assessment of potential environmental impacts resulting from the cumulative effects of potential development facilitated by Housing Element policy and amendments to the General Plan's District Plans section, in accordance with the City's land use policies as set forth in the General Plan and as adjusted through General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 3 4 Introduction the proposed Housing Element. The purpose of the environmental assessment is to determine whether there are any peculiar types of impacts that could occur as an indirect result of adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment, Initial Study Project Description 2 Proiect Descri 2.1 - Project Title General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 2.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 2.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number Richard MacHott, Planning Manager 951-674-3124 x209 2.4 - Project Location The City of Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element applies to all residential and mixed-use zoning districts and all General Plan land use designations that allow residential or mixed-use development within the municipal boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore. The proposed amendments to Chapter 10.0 (North Peak District), Chapter 13.0 (Lakeland Village Sphere District) and Chapter 15.0 (North Central Sphere District) of the District Plans Section of the General Plan recognize the existing unincorporated communities of Meadowbrook, Lakeland Village and Warm Springs. Located within western Riverside County, the City of Lake Elsinore is bounded by the City of Canyon Lake to the east and the City of Wildomar to the southeast and the remaining area consisting of unincorporated Riverside County. The City's planning area (including its sphere of influence) encompasses approximately 72 square miles. Exhibit 1 (Regional Location and Vicinity Map) illustrates the City's location within western Riverside County and its local context. 2.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 2.6 - General Plan Land Use Designation The residential and mixed-use land use designations that support housing development within the City of Lake Elsinore consist of the following: Hillside Residential (0.0-1.0 DU/Acre): This category of low-density single-family residential development and steep slopes. Minimum lot size is dependent on the a between one -acre for under 15% slope up to ten -acre m General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 5 residential use is primarily intended for small-scale agricultural uses in areas of verage slope of an individual subdivision inimum for 35% slope and above. Project Description Lakeside Residential (0.0-4.0 DU/Acre): This category is primarily intended for custom single- family homes on properties that are oriented and have accessibility to Lake Elsinore. Densities are limited to 1 dwelling unit per 10,000 net square foot lot for new subdivisions. Low Density Residentia/ (1.0-3.0 DU/Acre): This category of residential use is primarily intended to provide for the development of traditional single-family subdivisions with one dwelling permitted per lot at a density between 1 to 3 dwelling units per acre. Low -Medium Density Residential (1.0-6.0 DU/Acre): This category of residential use is also primarily intended to provide for the development of traditional single-family subdivisions with one dwelling permitted per lot, but with an increased density allowance between 1 to 6 dwelling units per acre. Medium Density Residential (7.0-18.0 DU/Acre): This category of residential use allows for moderate density housing either as attached or detached single-family or attached multi -family units between 7 to 18 dwelling units per acre. High Density Residential (19.0-24.0 DU/Acre): This category of residential use allows for a broad range of dwelling unit types that may be either attached single- or multi -family residential units between 19 to 24 dwelling units per acre. Commercial Mixed Use 7.0-18.0 DU/Acre): This category provides for a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a single development with an emphasis on retail, service, civic, and professional office uses. Residential uses are also allowed as subordinate to non-residential uses at a density between 7 to 18 dwelling units per acre. Residential Mixed Use (19.0-24.0 DU/Acre): This category also provides for a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a single development with an emphasis on high density residential uses. Residential uses are allowed at a density between 19 to 24 dwelling units per acre. 2.7 - Zoning District The Lake Elsinore Zoning Code presently provides for eight primary residential zoning classifications. The densities of the zones range from 0.1 dwelling units per acre (10 acre minimum lot size) to 24 dwelling units per acre depending on development type as well as affordable and senior housing density bonuses. Each of the classifications is listed below: • Rural Mountainous Residential (R -M -R) • Rural Residential (R -R) • Estate Single -Family Residential (R -E) • Hillside Single -Family Residential (R -H) • Single -Family Residential (R-1) • Medium Density Residential (R-2) • High Density Residential (R-3) • Mobilehome Community (MC) • Residential Mixed Use (RMU) • Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) 6 Initial Study Project Description 2.8 - Project Description The Housing Element and the Land Use Element comprise two of the seven General Plan Elements mandated by the State of California, as expressed in Sections 65580 to 65589.8 of the California Government Code. California State Law requires that the Housing Element consist of "identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. As required by State Housing Law, the City of Lake Elsinore must plan for its share of the region's new housing needs in the five state -defined income categories by identifying an adequate supply of land zoned at appropriate densities to accommodate needs in each income category. The RHNA goals do not explicitly require the City to construct the identified housing need, but rather seek to ensure the City has, or plans to add polices, programs and regulations that will accommodate new housing growth. The proposed Project includes the following entitlements: • General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 - Adoption and implementation of the City of Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element; and adoption of amendments to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element's District Plans Section in order to comply with State Law (California Government Code Section 65302.10) that adds language regarding the unincorporated Meadowbrook Community to Chapter 10.0 (North Peak District), regarding the unincorporated Lakeland Village Community to Chapter 13.0 (Lakeland Village Sphere District) and regarding the unincorporated Warm Springs Community to Chapter 15.0 (North Central Sphere District). The project consists of two components consisting of: 1. The adoption and implementation of the City of Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element, which represents an update of the City's Housing Element. The Housing Element is an integral component of the City's General Plan as it addresses existing and future housing needs of all types for persons in all economic segment groups within the City. The Housing Element serves as a tool for decision -makers and the public in understanding and meeting housing needs in Lake Elsinore. While the law does not require local governments to actually construct housing to meet identified needs, it does require that the community address housing needs in its discretionary planning actions such as creating opportunities for housing in the land use plan and facilitating development through policies. To meet this goal, the Housing Element identifies existing vacant or underdeveloped areas already designated by the General Plan Land Use Element to provide for the City's projected housing needs. 2. The identification of each unincorporated community within or adjacent to the City's sphere of influence. Pursuant to Section 65302.10(b) of the California Government Code the City is required to update its Land Use Element to identify each unincorporated "island" or "fringe" community within its sphere of influence and include an analysis of water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and structural needs or deficiencies and financing alternatives that could make the extension of services to identified communities financially feasible. This update of the Land Use Element consists of the above -identified amendments to the District Plans Section of the General Plan. Statutory Requirements State law requires the Housing Element be updated at least every eight years, on a timeline consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, unless extended by the legislature. Article 10.6, Section 65580 - 65589.8, Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code sets forth General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 7 Project Description the legal requirements for a housing element and encourages the provision of affordable and decent housing in suitable living environments for all communities to meet statewide goals. This 2014-2021 Housing Element update is a policy document by the City of Lake Elsinore regarding its current and projected future housing needs (as identified by the State Housing and Community Development Department [HCD] and the Southern California Association of Governments [SCAG]), and the City's goals, policies, and programs to address those identified needs. Government Code Section 65583 requires that housing elements include the following main components: • An assessment of housing needs (including the needs of special needs groups), analysis of constraints to housing development, and an inventory of resources related to the meeting of these needs. • A review of the previous Housing Element's goals, policies, programs, and objectives to ascertain the effectiveness of each of these components, as well as the overall effectiveness of the programs in the previous Housing Element. • A Statement of community goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing. • Actions that the City is undertaking or intends to undertake, in implementing the policies set forth in the Housing Element, Government Code Section 65302.10 requires the City to address "Fringe" and "Island" communities that are either within its sphere of influence or adjacent to it within its Land Use Element upon its next adoption of its Housing Element. State law requires that the City's Land Use Element address existing and planned water, wastewater, flood control, and fire protection services within these communities and potential funding mechanisms that may be utilized for expansion of each of these services. Housing Needs The Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element profiles key community demographics and examines the related housing needs of various groups, including owners versus renters, lower- income households, overcrowded households, elderly households, special needs groups, and homeless persons, among others. This information is detailed in the Housing Element. California housing element law requires that each city and county develop local housing programs designed to meet their "fair share" of housing needs for all income groups, based on projected population growth. HCD Housing Policy Division develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA) for each region of the State, represented by councils of governments. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) determines the housing allocation for each city and county within its six -county jurisdiction. SCAG has assigned Lake Elsinore a housing allocation of 4,929 units for the 2014-2021 planning period. Lake Elsinore previously adopted an updated element for the 2008-2014 planning period. Table 2-1 (Lake Elsinore RHNA) identifies the total projected housing needs for the 2014-2021 Housing Element. 8 Initial Study Project Description Table 2-1 Lake Elsinore RHNA Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 2012 'State law allows local jurisdictions to use 50 percent of the very low income category to represent households of extremely low-income (less than 30 percent of the AMI). State law requires that a community provide an adequate number of sites to allow for and facilitate production of the City's regional share of housing. To determine whether the City has sufficient land to accommodate its share of regional housing needs for all income groups, the City must identify "adequate sites." Under State law (California Government Code Section 55583.c.1), adequate sites are those with appropriate zoning and development standards, with services and facilities, needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing for all income levels. Land considered suitable for residential development includes the following: • Vacant residentially zoned sites; • Vacant non -residentially zoned sites that allow residential uses (such as mixed- use); • Underutilized residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density or with greater intensity; and • Non-residential zoned sites that can be redeveloped for, and/or rezoned for, residential use (via program actions). Focus Areas An important component of the Lake Elsinore Housing Element is the identification of sites and future housing development opportunities for the 2014-2021 planning period. Since Lake Elsinore has a sufficient amount of undeveloped land, the majority of what is identified in the Sites Inventory section focuses on vacant sites zoned for residential or mixed-use. Underutilized sites are also analyzed. Opportunities for residential development in the City fall into one of these categories: • Vacant land that is designated for residential or mixed-use • Underutilized sites that permit residential or mixed-use where the current use of the property is less than the maximum allowed by the general plan designation, and where infrastructure needs for additional development can be met by existing or proposed systems The sites identified are locations determined to be ideal for accommodating future housing, including affordable housing. Analyses based on potential environmental constraints, infrastructure, and realistic development capacity calculations are discussed. Also included is an analysis of non -vacant and underutilized lands. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 9 of:County '2O1r2;Total `;,; Are'a'Median` Housing Income :. Units Percent";; .Income Group , AMx - Allocated - -of Units ' Very Low' 0-50% 1,196 24% Low >50-80%__, 801 16% Moderate >80-120 897 18% Above Moderate 120%+ 2,035 41% Total --- 4,929 100% Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 2012 'State law allows local jurisdictions to use 50 percent of the very low income category to represent households of extremely low-income (less than 30 percent of the AMI). State law requires that a community provide an adequate number of sites to allow for and facilitate production of the City's regional share of housing. To determine whether the City has sufficient land to accommodate its share of regional housing needs for all income groups, the City must identify "adequate sites." Under State law (California Government Code Section 55583.c.1), adequate sites are those with appropriate zoning and development standards, with services and facilities, needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing for all income levels. Land considered suitable for residential development includes the following: • Vacant residentially zoned sites; • Vacant non -residentially zoned sites that allow residential uses (such as mixed- use); • Underutilized residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density or with greater intensity; and • Non-residential zoned sites that can be redeveloped for, and/or rezoned for, residential use (via program actions). Focus Areas An important component of the Lake Elsinore Housing Element is the identification of sites and future housing development opportunities for the 2014-2021 planning period. Since Lake Elsinore has a sufficient amount of undeveloped land, the majority of what is identified in the Sites Inventory section focuses on vacant sites zoned for residential or mixed-use. Underutilized sites are also analyzed. Opportunities for residential development in the City fall into one of these categories: • Vacant land that is designated for residential or mixed-use • Underutilized sites that permit residential or mixed-use where the current use of the property is less than the maximum allowed by the general plan designation, and where infrastructure needs for additional development can be met by existing or proposed systems The sites identified are locations determined to be ideal for accommodating future housing, including affordable housing. Analyses based on potential environmental constraints, infrastructure, and realistic development capacity calculations are discussed. Also included is an analysis of non -vacant and underutilized lands. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 9 Project Description The sites inventory includes properties within the Commercial Mixed Use, High Density, and Residential Mixed Use designations, as well as two specific plan areas. A total of 823.17 acres of vacant and underutilized land has been identified as most suitable for accommodating the City's remaining housing need, in twelve Focus Areas. The twelve focus areas have a potential combined capacity for 5,925 dwelling units. Table 2-2 High Density 19-24+ 84 24 1,598 Residential Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Specific Plan Diamond Specific Plan Total 19-24+ 43 24 825 7-18 238 18 1,501 Varies 400 Varies 1,401 <18 87 <18 600 5,925 1. Acreage reduced to 80 -percent and multiplied by density to calculate total dwelling units in High Density and Residential Mixed Use Designations; Median density utilized for Commercial Mixed Use; Specific Plan unit count pursuant to adopted Specific Plans and maps For the purposes of this Initial Study and the Housing Element, these twelve focus areas are specifically identified. The proposed project would not permit any additional allowance for commercial space or residential units beyond that which is currently permitted under existing development regulations. The sites presented below represent the most realistic opportunities for recycling to residential uses based on underutilized character of the site, developer interest, ease of access from major roads, size of sites, and location near transit and services. Sites are detailed below and summary information is included in Table 2-3 (Focus Areas Land Inventory). Sites are further illustrated in Exhibits 2 through 13. To calculate the number of potential residential units, an expected maximum residential density of per each land use designation has been applied to all areas based on recent approved mixed-use and high density residential development projects within the City that have achieved or exceeded these densities. 10 Initial Study Project Description Table 2-3 Focus Areas Land Inventory 10 Business District Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.7 156 11 Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Specific Plan 5-30 du/ac varies 400 1,401 12 Diamond Specific Plan M ivari I I<a max 24 du <18 87 -- 600 791.3 The Focus Areas will serve as the primary basis for environmental impact analysis in this Initial Study. This is based on the fact that specific policies and direction within the proposed Housing Element are guiding these parcels to be developed or recycled and therefore could lead to a future physical change in the environment. Constraints to Housing Production The housing constraints section of the Housing Element analyzes barriers that may hinder the City's ability to achieve its housing objectives or to obtain the necessary resources to assist in the production, maintenance, and improvement of the overall housing stock. A number of different dynamics that include governmental, market, infrastructure, and environmental factors may constrain the provision of adequate and affordable housing in a city. Consequently, State law requires that Housing Elements analyze potential and actual governmental and non-governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons of all income levels and disabilities. In instances where barriers exist, State law requires the local jurisdiction to demonstrate efforts to remove, where General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 11 Lake View District Capacity Residential Under- w/o Focus Density Estimated Vacant utilized density Area Land Use Designation Range Density Acreage Acreage bonus' Lake Elsinore Hills District 3 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 1 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 143.64 1.96 923 10 Business District Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.7 156 11 Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Specific Plan 5-30 du/ac varies 400 1,401 12 Diamond Specific Plan M ivari I I<a max 24 du <18 87 -- 600 791.3 The Focus Areas will serve as the primary basis for environmental impact analysis in this Initial Study. This is based on the fact that specific policies and direction within the proposed Housing Element are guiding these parcels to be developed or recycled and therefore could lead to a future physical change in the environment. Constraints to Housing Production The housing constraints section of the Housing Element analyzes barriers that may hinder the City's ability to achieve its housing objectives or to obtain the necessary resources to assist in the production, maintenance, and improvement of the overall housing stock. A number of different dynamics that include governmental, market, infrastructure, and environmental factors may constrain the provision of adequate and affordable housing in a city. Consequently, State law requires that Housing Elements analyze potential and actual governmental and non-governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons of all income levels and disabilities. In instances where barriers exist, State law requires the local jurisdiction to demonstrate efforts to remove, where General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 11 Lake View District 2 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 18.24 350 Lake Edge/Lake View District 3 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 9.62 185 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 39.93 1.22 257 Lake Edge/Lake View District 4 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 26.38 2.82 561 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 28.37 18.65 294 Riverview District 5 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 9.85 189 Historic District 6 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 5.24 1.00 120 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 3.93 1.66 107 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 0.62 4 Historic District 7 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 5.06 4.57 185 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 2.30 44 Historic District 8 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.91 170 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 1.86 23 Business District 9 �:_i 1 n on A- 1— 7a 7 R S7 356 10 Business District Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.7 156 11 Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Specific Plan 5-30 du/ac varies 400 1,401 12 Diamond Specific Plan M ivari I I<a max 24 du <18 87 -- 600 791.3 The Focus Areas will serve as the primary basis for environmental impact analysis in this Initial Study. This is based on the fact that specific policies and direction within the proposed Housing Element are guiding these parcels to be developed or recycled and therefore could lead to a future physical change in the environment. Constraints to Housing Production The housing constraints section of the Housing Element analyzes barriers that may hinder the City's ability to achieve its housing objectives or to obtain the necessary resources to assist in the production, maintenance, and improvement of the overall housing stock. A number of different dynamics that include governmental, market, infrastructure, and environmental factors may constrain the provision of adequate and affordable housing in a city. Consequently, State law requires that Housing Elements analyze potential and actual governmental and non-governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons of all income levels and disabilities. In instances where barriers exist, State law requires the local jurisdiction to demonstrate efforts to remove, where General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 11 Project Description appropriate and legally possible, governmental constraints that hinder the achievement of housing goals. The City has established a goal within the Housing Plan to remove governmental constraints on to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. State and Federal regulations, which are beyond" local jurisdiction control, can also add to governmental constraints. Regulations related to environmental protection, building codes, and other topics have significant, often adverse, impacts on housing costs and availability. Although Federal and State agencies play a role in the imposition of governmental constraints, the actions of these agencies are, for the most part, beyond the influence of local government and are therefore not addressed in this document. Housing Plan The Housing Plan is established to guide the development and preservation of a balanced inventory of housing to meet the needs of present and future residents of the City. To achieve this goal, the Housing Plan identifies long-term housing goals and shorter -term policies to address the identified housing needs. The goals and policies are then implemented through a series of housing programs. Programs identify specific actions the City plans to undertake toward achieving each goal and policy. The following goals, policies, and implementation programs represent the policy direction of the 2014-2021 Housing Element. Goal Preservation, maintenance, and improvement of the existing housing stock to provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for the residents of Lake Elsinore. Policy 1.1 Continue to enforce building, land use, and property maintenance codes. Policy 1.2 Facilitate the removal or rehabilitation of housing units that pose serious health and safety hazards to residents and adjacent structures. Policy 1.3 Continue programs directed at preserving the physical quality of housing and neighborhood environments and maintaining compliance with established standards. Policy 1.4 Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of all new housing developments and the addition of energy conservation devices/practices in existing developments. Program 1: Code Enforcement - Enforce City codes to remedy unsightly or hazardous conditions in residential neighborhoods. Provide information and technical assistance to property owners regarding housing maintenance. Program 2: Removal of Substandard Housing - Eliminate, through demolition, unsafe and dilapidated housing units that cannot be rehabilitated. Program 3: Abandoned Properties - Enforce the City's Abandoned Residential Property Registration Program (Ordinance 1252), and encourage owners of houses and properties that become vacant and abandoned due to foreclosure to maintain or rehabilitate the properties. Program 4: Housing Rehabilitation Programs CDBG Home Repair Program: Utilize CDBG or other funds, as available, to provide financial assistance for minor repairs of homes owned and occupied by 12 Initial Study Project Description lower-income residents. Eligible repairs include plumbing, electrical, painting, carpentry, roof repairs, and masonry work. Provide assistance to approximately 10-15 very low- and low-income households. In -Lieu Fee Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program: Institute a pilot housing rehabilitation program funded with in -lieu fees received, providing loans and/or grants up to $5,000 for exterior improvements. Provide assistance to approximately 10 very low- and low-income households. Program 5: Energy Conservation - Implement the Climate Action Plan (CAP) to reduce local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with State law. Carry out the housing related strategies and measures identified in the CAP to meet GHG emissions targets over the next two decades. Goal The provision of affordable housing to accommodate the local housing needs. Policy 2.1 Preserve and expand the City's supply of affordable (low- and/or moderate - income) rental and ownership housing for lower- income households. Policy 2.2 Use incentives and regulatory concessions to promote the development of housing for lower-income persons and those with special needs including, but not limited to, large families, persons with physical or developmental disabilities, families with children, the elderly, and the homeless. Policy 2.3 Encourage partnerships to maximize resources available for the provision of affordable housing. Policy 2.4 Actively pursue federal and state housing program funds to provide housing assistance and to support the development of housing affordable to lower- income households. Policy 2.5 Discourage the conversion of existing apartment units to condominiums where such conversion will diminish the supply of very low, low- and moderate -income housing. Policy 2.6 Promote coordination and cooperation between the City, developers, and neighborhood residents early and throughout the process for affordable housing developments. Program 6: Density Bonus - Encourage the use of the Density Bonus Ordinance to obtain higher densities in residential developments and increase the availability of affordable housing units in exchange for exceptional architecture and amenities. A copy of the Density Bonus Ordinance shall be attached to Residential Design Review Applications. Program 7: Affordable Housing Sites - Make available on the City website and distribute to interested developers a list of City -owned property suitable for affordable housing projects and the Housing Element which includes a Residential Sites Inventory and Site Suitability Analysis. Update the City - owned property list annually. Provide Habitat for Humanity - Inland Valley with information on residential sites suitable for affordable housing development. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 13 Project Description Program 8: Affordable Housing Partnerships - Work with agencies and organizations to increase affordable housing activities such as construction, rehabilitation, or financial assistance to renters and owners. Provide a link to available housing programs for residents and developers on the City website. Partnerships and programs to continue and/or pursue include but are not limited to: County of Riverside Housing Authority (City/County Mortgage Revenue Bonds), County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (First Time Home Buyer and Mortgage Certificate Program), California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), Habitat for Humanity. Endeavor to facilitate at least one affordable housing project during the planning period. Program 9: Rental Assistance - Continue to support the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Direct eligible households to the Section 8 rental assistance program managed by the Housing Authority of Riverside County. Provide information to landlords regarding participation in the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. Program 10: Special Needs Housing Partnerships - Encourage non-profit organizations to pursue funding for the construction of elderly, disabled, or other special needs housing. Provide referrals to programs such as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program and the California Department of Mental Health/CalHFA Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Housing Program, Program 11: Homeless Need - Consistent with available funding, address the needs of at -risk and homeless individuals and families through assistance to non- profits serving the homeless population. Goal 3 Adequate sites to accommodate the City's housing need. Policy 3.1 Use the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, other land use and development plans, and the development process to provide housing sites that meet the identified local need. Policy 3.2 Promote a balance of housing types, including mixed-use development, to meet the needs of the community. Policy 3.3 Maintain an inventory of vacant and underutilized land and make available to the development community. Policy 3.4 Promote the provision of housing for special needs households. Program 12: Consistency Zoning - Continue with subsequent phases of the Consistency Zoning Project to bring zoning consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations, in accordance with the Compatibility Matrix shown in Appendix B of the General Plan. As part of Zoning Code amendments, incorporate a matrix of permitted uses in residential zones into Title 17 - Zoning of the Municipal Code to facilitate understanding of allowed uses. 14 Initial Study Project Description Program 13: Specific Plans - Promote development within existing and future specific plans to produce planned community environments with a variety of housing types and densities. Program 14: Development Agreements - Work toward the incorporation of a wide range of housing types (including special needs housing), densities, and affordability levels during the negotiation or renegotiation of development agreements with residential developers. Encourage developers to construct a percentage of affordable housing concurrently with market rate housing in each phase of development. During the Development Agreement process, facilitate and incentivize, as feasible, the development of housing projects on small sites, lot consolidation of adjacent small sites, and development of large parcels sizes that facilitate multi -family developments affordable to lower income households. Goal Remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. Policy 4.1 Periodically review residential development standards and regulations, ordinances, processing procedures, and fees to identify and mitigate constraints that may impede the development, improvement, and conservation of housing. Policy 4.2 Provide avenues for the development of housing for extremely low-income and special needs persons. Program 15: Special Needs and Extremely Low -Income Housing - Support the housing needs of special needs households by prioritizing projects that include special needs housing or housing for extremely/very low-income households and by referring residents to the Inland Regional Center for housing and services available for persons with developmental disabilities. Review the Zoning Code to ensure compliance with Government Code Section 65583(a)(5) relating to transitional and supportive housing as a residential use of property, subject to only those restrictions applicable to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Goal 5 Equal access to housing for all residents. Policy 5.1 Continue to enforce fair housing laws prohibiting discrimination in the building, financing, selling, or renting of housing on the basis of race, ethnicity, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor. Program 16: Fair Housing - Work towards ensuring fair housing choices for all residents by advertising resident rights under federal and State fair housing laws and providing access to local fair housing service providers. Make this information available on the City website. Amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code to revise or remove the definition of family to be flexible for a variety of household types, consistent with State and federal laws. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 15 Project Description Program 17: Reasonable Accommodation - Adopt a process to address requests for reasonable accommodation, and develop procedures regulating siting, funding, development and use of housing for people with disabilities. Amendments to District Plans Section of General Plan As required by Government Code Section 65302.10, the City has identified existing "fringe" and "island" communities that are either within its sphere of influence or adjacent to it. Communities that meet the Government Code Section 65302.10 definition of "Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities" (DUCs) were previously identified by the Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) as being communities that are below 80% of the State Median Household Income (MHI) based on the latest census data. Three communities meeting this definition were identified in or adjacent to the City of Lake Elsinore and its sphere of influence. The Warm Springs and Lakeland Village communities are located within the City's sphere of influence and the community of Meadowbrook is adjacent to the City's sphere of influence. The amendment to the General Plan's District Plan component of the Land Use Element addresses existing and planned water, wastewater, flood control, and fire protection services within these communities and potential funding mechanisms that may be utilized for expansion of each of these services pursuant to State law; based on already existing plans for expansion of these services and does not make any specific obligation or expansion of existing plans to extend these services to these communities. The proposed amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. 2.9 - Project Objectives The goals, policies, and programs within the Housing Plan build upon the identified housing needs in the community, constraints confronting the City, and resources available to address the housing needs. This Plan will guide City housing policy through the 2014-2021 planning period. Lake Elsinore's housing goals, policies, and programs as noted above address the following five major areas: 1. Conserve and Improve Existing Housing Stock; 2. Remove Barriers to Housing Development; 3. Provision of Adequate Housing Sites; 4. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing; and 5. Promote Fair Housing Practices. 2.10 - Surrounding Land Uses The Focus Areas identified in the Housing Element each have specific surrounding land uses that must be noted because those conditions will serve as a portion of the baseline for environmental analysis in this Initial Study. The existing surrounding land uses for each site are summarized in Table 2-4 (Focus Areas Surrounding Land Uses). 16 Initial Study N d N 13 C m J V N v O LL n N > T T T T T — .. @ c E @ c@ E c @ c @ c c v M �n c u c Ery c m LL @ @ y @ cm @ m @ m-:�� LL @ vam oiv> > oiv> ,UoE > o �> > > j v> :.Z K n_ mv> K K K U rL io i in i7i T T T T T T T 0 E;,° E-`�-°,.;u E;°+-� Ems.. uEy -uEYN E;°,.T;° Y LL @ C@ LL W C C O LL @ C C LL C@ @ C C LL O@ @ C v LL v C v@ @ C C LL UI u C@ u C G LL U) u O- -_ C U v E O O@ v E v@ v D u u-a v D E E v;o @ @ v a@ D c@ a t C O)v O��> O O1�> > aU)> O Olv > a > > O1�> OO 0LL v5 ' uK U cK N U N U N R' > y... 'E m> u 2, E 2 E m E E T E m E 1O ER 3 @ @ > @ C C @ C C @ C C@ C C@ C C O LL @ C C@ LL C C@ LL C C LL C @ C @ 5 LL O@ LL O@ LL O@ LL v@ m v@ E O@ v@ D O@ D N O O v D mm> v D Oim> v D O1m> N D mm> N D N a�n> E N D mm> v mm> v Oi �n> @ > @ > xb r`€v! �- U W in O �cc N uiw C v N� C v O N� U C v na C v 0 C N Nz N y �> LL LL UI u LL O u LL O U E v LL O u E O LL N u LL v LL Ul U UI C7 �> U Qi�> Ol �> ULL OI �> uLL Cl�> O , Olw> m� u C @ C� C > N @ > N� N N� @ su @ N > N N n > gwa T T T T mT�E Ey ET .E Ef E;° ,E ET y N— C@ 0 C C LL @ C C LL v@ @ C C@ LL O u C C LL v u @ C C LL O U @ C C@ LL O U C C LL O U O@ C C LL O u @ C U1 LL� t E v u L \ ICO IL O��> U OID> O1�> O1�> OID> 01�> O1D> N OBD> E 5v C 55 U LL. @ C @ CLL' co C 2i C K C UI C a N C C co C N O K U N N > In N „.a> u Lac E°� E E@ uE°E° E° E° > \ C@ @ G C LL @ C C LL N@ @ C LL O u@ C L G@ LL v C C LL v V C u @ C C@ C C — C E v@ U) D U) D O D u U1 D @ �p v D v 9 @ L Eo W > oIG> m�,> rnm>> E w o�na osv> �a > o,�> oiv> > c0 in ink inw U coD Na Na c U C D_ O @ T O U S @ _ v m C u N 5 a+ LL C E @ E°n.I E N E- Es�i'N T� C E @ C C C > U LL m u u LL@ U LL `0 LL LL v u T E v u sa a� of oI > 3 LL > > > > 3 'q > oI w > D v v m v 0 ' iN O in K l= 'in u N K v K In K W U @ c v 01 C @ C E yu Er.J v c @N T.L. ''' C > C > Y LL� v@ LLv LL O> u_>Evu° C N C u E „7 E c @.� @ @ E Z. > mw m > om ui c of 3LLw>E@�-v Yn > 3 u > U LL > C LL d a H N H s b n N 00 14 Project Description 2,11 - Environmental Setting The City of Lake Elsinore is located in southwestern Riverside County. The City lies on either side of Interstate 15 and is pocketed by the surrounding hillsides, including the Cleveland National Forest to the west. Interstate 15 provides access to the regional highway network. The City has seen substantial development in the past twenty years, however large amounts of vacant areas still exist within the City. The topography of the City varies between flat areas amongst the core and downtown areas of the City north and east of Lake Elsinore and transitions to steeper terrain elsewhere in the City. The Focus Areas identified in the Housing Element each have specific environmental settings that must be noted because those conditions will serve as the primary baseline for environmental analysis in this Initial Study. The existing environmental settings on these sites are summarized in Table 2-5 (Focus Areas Existing Conditions). Table 2-5 Fnruc Arpac Frictinn Conditions Zon it#/GP PocusArea. ..Existi►ii .�.atl�r>I�se��,'��,r, .....<�. .,..Aesination 1 vacant CMU 2 vacant, industrial RMU 3 vacant HDR, CMU 4 vacant HDR, CMU 5 vacant HDR 6 single family residential, vacant HDR, RMU, CMU 7 single family residential, vacant HDR, RMU g vacant RMU, CMU 9 single family residential vacant HDR 10 vacant RMU 11 mining, vacant SP 12 vacant parking lot SP The Warm Springs community generally consists of rural residential land uses typically on lot sizes 1/2 -acre or greater, with some smaller size lots. Commercial land uses exist to the south of the community along Central Avenue and Temescal Canyon High School is located to the west of the community. Areas to the southeast and east between the community and Central Avenue contain a mix of vacant and similar rural residential development. Areas to the north of the community generally consist of vacant land or lower density rural residential. The area is generally relatively flat, sloping downward to the south, with some steeper terrain as it transitions to the hillsides to the north. The Lakeland Village community generally consists of rural residential development with 1/2 - acre or larger size lots with some minor commercial or light industrial land uses. The community lies between Lake Elsinore on the northeast and hillsides to the northwest that transition into the Cleveland National Forest. Areas to the northwest and southeast generally consist of single-family residential land uses. Areas to the southwest and partially to the south of the Meadowbrook community consist of recent single family residential developments and the remaining areas to the west, north, east, and south generally consist of either similar rural residential or vacant hillside areas. The topography in the community is relatively flat generally sloping downward to the south and east along State Highway 74, with some isolated areas with steep slopes and where it General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 19 Project Description transitions to the surrounding hillsides to the north, west, and southeast that generally border the community. 2.12 - Required Approvals The City Council must approve General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 that incorporates the 2014-2021 Housing Element into the current General Plan and includes Land Use Element amendments to Chapter 10.0 (North Peak District), Chapter 13.0 (Lakeland Village Sphere District) and Chapter 15.0 (North Central Sphere District) of the District Plans Section of the General Plan. 2.13 - Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required The State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development will review the Housing Element for compliance with State law and indicate whether the adopted Element is consistent with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). However, no permits are required from that department. 20 Initial Study Exhibit 1 Regional Context -Vicinity 3 ea r �wry a� , 4 S n fi frfr E � J a l,.i tAQi hl T. .. �- g n z RtA Regional Context Map Vicinity Map /1 Not to Scale Regional/Vicinity Map City of Lake Elsinore, California General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 21 Project Description 22 Initial Study C O z CL .c U H d 0 u U d 0 O a N O C W N «5 J N M � L � a¢ � WN O QLL. N U O L- M N m � N a O w M U � O U- N p 4) Z m g a+ c o N m d N w a E c E j o a £ c � 0 a m a� � J a It N M � � Q .c H X W G LL Lw N N N L v� �a GE C O O. �L u a d u u d V O L IL ao N c 0 r a u d D u u d 0 a mm s u) X W u0 LL f d a M N d N oO o N D X N i N N N N � L p m U- C� S f=/1 N C Q E C t� X E -i_ w C) cr J 0 m � L �a .moi, M N M n0 .c Q s H X 0 LL an 3701 M M a M U U O U) n m s M X Lu u LL Q U O N V V Q Ln M m N O a i M a � � N � � N m 'y O N z ❑ N c Z d E ❑ ❑2 V i x U C ®®� C 77 0% d Y L r a x� W LL WE ltf Q cn U O LL n M 8 N O � � N M � o O x K N g O � Z 0 N d U 0� v c) � a a3 w = LL U of U Cf J 000i, i C M r wu O U. U U O C m Z Q' c 3 c 0 M m M q O o O o O m � _T N C N � Q N V O O O O U Q O to to = aL U d 'Fu 4) m m m a N D 0 N E _ d E N •y QI J 2�C))�0w K at m M, N c 0 Y CL L u N d 0 d .o L a t W W U O LL .i, II I VIII IIII 0 o 0 d ai a x x m c N y � a g w af U 4 \a� %amN, i �0 - O0` Ou 14 H�1��0`\vi`\\ -- ■ Iq IT 0 o 0 d ai a x x m c N y � a g w af U 4 Ou Iq IT N a ti N 'i N M .S Q s U) X c U. M It it IT m 7 X u LU c LL N V ¢ O o O m O o - -- 2:, 2:1 N C _ N C N C) C3 O M p = C1 Of X d d N V' ID IT c 0 Z rx u O E 6 R N 0 rl0 N co v # E .E � G 2( L\ 2 \ = _ 2 v) E Lu a) k -.eU � \ 0m % Ut Q m � � \j 2 � . k 0 Ln £ § E 2§ k0 � f } I /; E § E 3 E �/ _ o s � $ U2 fu � N LO 3 Determination 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the ❑ J Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology / Water ❑ Emissions ❑ Materials ❑ Quality ❑ Land Use / Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing J F-1Public Services ❑ Recreation Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Systems ❑ of Significance 3.2 - Determination I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the El project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'potentially significant impact' or 'potentially significant unless mitigated' impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ j I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. .o Name Richard`J. MacHott, Planning Manager U3dtete General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 53 Determination 54 Initial Study 4.1 - Aesthetics Would the project: 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant with No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorporation Impact a) Have a substantial adverse( ❑ ( EJ on a scenic vista? El b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and El historic buildings within view from a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or El E]®. quality of the site and its El surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which El®. would adversely affect day or El nighttime views in the area? a) Less than Significant Impact. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two ways. First, a structure may be constructed that blocks the view of a vista. Second, the vista itself may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). The primary scenic vistas in the City of Lake Elsinore are of the surrounding hillsides and Lake Elsinore. In some cases, these views of the hillsides and in particular the lake are generally obstructed by trees, utility poles, and other buildings. The proposed project would adopt and implement housing policies which could encourage new housing production, in particular within the identified Focus Areas. The Focus Areas generally are not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista. Development of vacant sites with potential future housing developments guided by the policies of the Housing Element update would have no significant effect on a scenic vista. The City of Lake Elsinore has identified certain scenic areas within the City and has adopted the Scenic Overlay Zone, Lakeshore Overlay Zone, and Hillside Planned Development Overlay for the purposes of preserving these individual recognized scenic vista and viewshed areas. Each of these overlays provides certain additional use and/or development standards restrictions specific to each vista or viewshed overlay area. Application of these overlay restrictions, whether as applied directly to any Focus Area that may be located within an overlay or to any other housing development pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element, would ensure that these recognized vistas and viewsheds would continue to be preserved through the development review process and would thus result in a less than significant impact to scenic vistas. In addition, as determined by the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan EIR, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts to scenic vistas with the implementation of existing General General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 55 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Plan policies requiring or encouraging the preservation of scenic vistas and viewsheds and General Plan EIR mitigation requiring the preparation of visual simulations for development located within the scenic viewshed of Interstate -15. 1 The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. b) Less Than Significant Impact. No designated state scenic highways or eligible state scenic highways, as identified on the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, are located in the City of Lake Elsinore .2 However, Interstate 15 and State Highway 74, both of which are located within the City are listed as eligible (but not designated) state scenic highways. Although no designated scenic highways would be impacted, the eligible state scenic highways could be designated in the future when development may occur and be impacted then. Impacts related to potentially designated state scenic highways would be analyzed on an individual project basis and would utilize the applicable Corridor Protection Program, including land use density, site planning, landscaping, and structure appearance if these were to be adopted as designated state scenic highways. With the implementation of this program to protect the local scenic resources if these were to be designated state scenic highways, a less than significant impact will occur. c) Less Than Significant Impact. Development of the proposed project could result in a significant impact if it resulted in substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Degradation of visual character or quality is defined by substantial changes to the existing site appearance through construction of structures such that they are poorly designed or conflict with the site's existing surroundings. Future housing development could change the on- and off-site visual character of the area in which it is constructed. The proposed Focus Areas could potentially change vacant or already developed land for residential or mixed-use development. This type of development and buildings and architecture typically associated are generally similar in visual character as what currently exists in Lake Elsinore. Implementation of these City-wide and district specific goals and policies for residential development within each Focus Area or any residential development pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element or within the Warm Springs, Lakeland Village and Meadowbrook communities will ensure that the visual character of the City and each Land Use District is addressed through the development review process. Adherence to these existing General Plan goals and policies will result in a less than significant impact on the visual character and quality of the City and individual Land Use Districts related to future housing constructed pursuant to the Housing Element. d) Less Than Significant Impact. Future housing development would result in new sources of lighting. Typical light sources from a single-family home would be outdoor security lighting. Multiple -family residential and mixed-use developments would generally include outdoor security lighting and parking lot lights, depending on the type of development. Review of lighting associated with future housing development will be required through the development review process. Light spillover and glare is typically prevented by requiring lights to be designed to prevent the light from shining directly onto surrounding property. Compliance with existing City practices, procedures, and policies for lighting will ensure that lighting and glare impacts associated with potential new development are less than significant. 56 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.2 - Agriculture and Forest Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 57 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? --- - —- -- — ------ — - — b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ❑ ❑ ❑ contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code ❑ ❑ ❑ section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest ❑ ❑ ❑ use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- ❑ ❑ ❑ agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? a) No Impact. Housing development pursuant to the Housing Element will primarily occur on undeveloped properties. The map of Important Farmland in California (2010) prepared by the Department of Conservation does not identify any area within Lake Elsinore as being Prime General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 57 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance .3 Therefore, there will be no conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non- agricultural use as a result of this project. No impact will occur. b) No Impact. The California Department of Conservation indicates that no Williamson Act contracts are active for any area within Lake Elsinore .4 The Lake Elsinore General Plan does not identify any specific designation for agricultural uses, but does note that small scale agricultural uses may be appropriate in the Hillside Residential land use designation. The Lake Elsinore Zoning Code does not contain any agricultural zones or any zone that principally allows agricultural uses. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element updates do not propose any changes to uses allowed or development standards within the General Plan or Zoning Code related to agricultural uses. Therefore, there will be no conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact will occur. c -d) No Impact. Public Resources Code Section 12220(g) identifies forest land as land that can support 10 -percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. No area within Lake Elsinore is currently being managed or used for forest land as identified in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g), The USDA Forest Service vegetation maps identify most of the city as urban, herbaceous, or shrub type indicating that it is not capable of growing industrial wood tree species.5 Portions of the City are designated as hardwood forest/woodland. These areas of vegetation are primarily located within drainage, hillside, and other similar areas within the City. No new development opportunities to these areas would be facilitated due to the Housing Element and Land Use Element updates beyond that which is currently allowed. All of the identified Focus Areas are located entirely or primarily within areas designated as urban, herbaceous, or shrub type. Therefore, this project will have no impact to any timberland zoning or loss of forest land. e) No Impact. There are no agricultural operations or timberland production operations within the City. The project does not propose any changes to land use policies or zoning that protects hillside areas. No impact related to the conversion of agricultural lands or forest land could occur. 58 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.3 - Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ ❑ air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality ❑ ❑ ❑ violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or ( ❑ ❑ ❑ state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( El( 1:1❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ ❑ people? a) No Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for formulating and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB. The AQMP is a series of plans adopted for the purpose of reaching short- and long-term goals for those pollutants. The SCAB is designated as a 'nonattainment' area because the District does not meet Federal and/or State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). To determine consistency between the project and the AQMP, the project must comply with all applicable District rules and regulations, comply with all proposed or adopted control measures, and be consistent with the growth forecasts utilized in preparation of the Plan.6 The Housing Element identifies twelve Focus Areas for future residential development. The Census indicated that the City had a population of 28,930 in 2000 and 51,821 in 2010, which would represent an approximately 79% increase. Based on a realistic estimation of density based on location and site conditions (including limitations), the Focus Areas identified in the Housing General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 59 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Element would result in approximately 5,925 new dwelling units and 20,145 new residents (based on 2010 Census 51,821 people in 15,239 households for 3.4 persons per household). SCAG provides population projection estimates in five-year increments from 2005 to 2035. According to the latest Growth Forecast (2012), SCAG estimates that the City would have a population of 70,500 in 2020 and a population of 93,800 in 2035.7 Buildout of the General Plan would result in a total of 94,616 dwelling units for a total buildout population of 321,694 persons, which provides for a substantially higher capacity than actual estimated population by SCAG for either 2020 or 2035. In addition, the proposed Housing Element and Focus Areas are projected to meet the City's allocated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which is a function of the City's projected long-term growth. Therefore, by complying with the RHNA, the Housing Element is contributing short-term towards consistency with long-term growth projections and the 2012 AQMP. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element updates do not propose densities higher than is already permitted in the existing General Plan that could result in a greater increase in population and households over that contemplated in the RTP and AQMP. These increases are within the growth assumptions estimated by SCAG and therefore would not result in a substantial conflict with or obstruction of the AQMP. Impacts will be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. Because the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element updates do not authorize any development project or land altering activity that would involve construction of new or redevelopment housing it will not result in any direct emissions that could contribute to an existing or potential violation of an air quality standard. The Housing Element and Land Use Element updates would have no effect on the City's rules and procedures governing assessment or control of air pollutant emissions. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element update will not directly result in construction of any development or infrastructure; however, future residential development supported by the policies of the updated Housing Element and Land Use Element will result in short-term criteria pollutant emissions. Short-term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and painting activities associated with new development. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). Pursuant to CEQA, short-term, project specific construction -related emissions will be analyzed as development proposals are submitted. Mitigation will be applied, where necessary, and typically includes requirements for use of low- VOC paints, installation of diesel particulate filters on older construction equipment, and limitations on hauling distances and or daily trips. To address operational emissions from a typical development project, an air quality modeling analysis is typically performed to determine if a project could regionally or locally cause a violation of any air quality standard. This analysis has already been performed associated with the City's current General Plan and EIR. The EIR quantifies the operational emissions that would occur from the buildout of the General Plan Land Use Plan.B Although the operational emissions from buildout of the General Plan would exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the EIR determined as a program level analysis these thresholds are not applicable and that implementation of General Plan policies, requirement for development air quality analysis, as well as SCAQMD implemented pollutant control measures would ensure that development that occurs pursuant to the General Plan would analyze the individual impacts of projects. However, the EIR determined that no mitigation is available to guarantee that operational emissions anticipated with buildout of the General Plan would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation and found that a potentially significant impact could occur. Since the Housing Element and Land Use Element update would not alter any land use designations that would alter the quantified emissions presented in the EIR or the determination of a potentially 60 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts significant impact, no additional impacts beyond those analyzed in the General Plan would occur. Therefore, no new or more significant impacts relative to air quality standards would result from implementation of the Housing Element and Land Use Element updates than those analyzed in the General Plan EIR. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD has prepared an Air Quality Management Plan to set forth a comprehensive and integrated program that will lead the Basin into compliance with the federal 24-hour PM2.5 air quality standard, and to provide an update to the Basin's commitments toward meeting the federal 8 -hour ozone standards. The SCAB is currently in non - attainment for State and Federal criteria pollutants Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10).9 New development facilitated by the Housing Element and Land Use Element updates will be required to comply with SCAQMD rules and regulations aimed at reducing construction -related pollutant emissions, including fugitive dust and other particulates, as well as reactive organic compounds and other ozone precursors found in paints and a variety of coatings. Considering that the proposed Housing Element and the Land Use Element updates are consistent with the development projections of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the breadth of existing standards and regulations, implementation of the proposed housing policies and implementation programs of the Housing Element update and the proposed Land Use Element update would not change or otherwise interfere with the regional pollutant control strategies of the AQMP. The project's impact on cumulative levels of regional ozone or particulates is therefore less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. Common sensitive receptors include children under age 14, the elderly over age 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. The project promotes development of housing for single-family households as well as the elderly; however the Housing Element and Land Use Element updates do not authorize construction or redevelopment of any housing units. Through its standard development review process that includes review pursuant to State CEQA statutes and guidelines, the City will ensure that any future housing projects developed pursuant to proposed Housing Element policies and programs provide adequate protection for project residents from any local air pollution sources. The project's impacts on sensitive receptors would be less than significant. e) Less than Significant Impact. Residential land uses typically do not create objectionable odors. Objectionable odors are typically associated with agricultural and heavy -manufacturing activities. A common potential source of odor from residential development projects comes from outdoor solid waste disposal bins. In accordance with current practices, all residential waste will be disposed of in covered receptacles and routinely removed, thereby limiting the escape of odors to the open air. No new odor sources would result from adoption of the Housing Element or the amendments to the Land Use Element because they do not authorize construction of any new housing project or redevelopment of existing housing. Furthermore, the updated elements would not authorize any relaxation or elimination of current requirements for proper waste storage and disposal for housing -related development projects. Therefore, the potential for the project to create objectionable odors is considered less than significant. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 61 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.4 - Biological Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ ❑ or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? I b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional I plans, policies, regulations, or by ❑ ❑ ❑ the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, ❑ ❑ ❑ coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native El El El or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? 62 Initial Study f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other ❑ approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore has numerous sites that are vacant and undeveloped, including the identified Focus Areas. The potential does exist for residential development pursuant to the proposed Housing Element policies and the Land Use Element to impact sensitive species or sensitive species habitat. As was analyzed in the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan EIR, these impacts are potentially significant, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of existing federal, State, regional, and local habitat and species protection programs as well as the policies of the General Plan and mitigation included in the EIR that would require analysis of development impact on sensitive species and habitat. 10 The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any impacts on sensitive species or habitat beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of these existing programs and policies, most importantly the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) which will require project -specific analysis of plant and wildlife impacts and habitat impacts. b -c) Less Than Significant Impact. A variety of drainages cross the City of Lake Elsinore originating from the surrounding hills and generally draining towards Lake Elsinore. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, wetlands are present within the City primarily around Lake Elsinore, but no riparian areas exist within the City." However, no wetlands are located within or near the identified Focus Areas. These impacts were analyzed in the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan EIR and were determined to be less than significant with the implementation of existing Federal and State programs, in particular Sections 401 and 404 of the U.S. Clean Water Act and Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any impacts on riparian habitat or wetlands beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of these existing programs on individual development projects. d) Less Than Significant Impact. Given the location of Lake Elsinore within the City, there are a variety of birds that migrate seasonally through the City on the Pacific flyway as well as certain birds that permanently reside locally. Pursuant to the Migratory Birds Treaty Act (META) any construction that occurs during breeding season (between February 15 and August 15) would require surveys for MBTA species and other special status species to determine if any such species exist on an individual development site and appropriate mitigation measures if deemed necessary. These impacts were previously analyzed by the City's General Plan EIR and determined to be less than significant with the implementation of this program, formalized as mitigation measures in the EIR. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 63 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Housing Element and amended Land Use Element would not increase any impacts on migration beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of these existing programs on individual development projects. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore does have a local palm tree preservation program. However, its purpose is primarily for preservation of aesthetic and City character. The City does not have any other local policies protecting biological resources. Continued implementation of the palm tree preservation program on individual projects would ensure that future housing developed pursuant to Housing Element policy would not conflict with any local policies and less than significant impacts will occur. f) Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the City is located within and is a co -permittee to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The plan is intended to conserve biological resources within the western Riverside County region by establishing a network of conservation areas. This network would comprise lands already publicly owned and set aside for conservation as well as additional lands identified for conservation on individual development projects located within conservation Criteria Cells. Any development located within MSHCP conservation Criteria Cells will require review for determining if conservation is required within the project area to contribute to the conservation network. In addition, as discussed previously in sections 4.4.a, individual development projects will require review for sensitive species and habitat in accordance with the MSHCP. Focus Areas 1, 8, 10, 11, and 12 and the Meadowbrook community are all located partially or entirely within MSHCP conservation Criteria Cells. The City is also located partially within the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKR HCP), which is intended to preserve habitat for the federally -listed endangered species and state -listed threatened species. The plan requires development specific analysis for presence of the species or habitat and the payment of an impact mitigation fee for properties located within the SKR HCP area. No other Habitat Conservation Plan,'Z Natural Community Conservation Plan area, 13 or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan are located within the City. With the continued implementation of the MSHCP by the City through the development review process, less than significant impacts will occur. 64 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.5 - Cultural Resources Would the project: a) Less Than Significant Impact. A variety of historical resources exist within the City as identified in the City's General Plan EIR. As is analyzed in the EIR, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts with implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to historical resources as well as policies included within the General Plan. 14 The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any potential impacts on historical resources beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of these existing programs and policies on individual development projects. b -d) Less than Significant Impact. As is noted in the City's General Plan EIR, given the area's previous habitation by the Luiseno people and geological conditions, there is a moderate to high likelihood for both archaeological and paleontological resources to exist within undeveloped areas within the City. The analysis in the EIR notes that less than significant impacts would occur from development pursuant to the General Plan with the implementation of existing policies and programs as well as mitigation included in the EIR and policies of the General Plan, which generally require surveying of sites for archaeological and paleontological resources and mitigation if appropriate for individual development projects. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any potential impacts on archaeological or paleontological resources beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of the mitigation General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 65 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Cause a substantial adverse change l in the significance of a historical El El E3resource as defined in 15064.5? - --- ..---- b) -- — Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or ❑ ❑ ❑'/ ❑ site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of ❑ ❑ ®/' ❑ formal cemeteries? a) Less Than Significant Impact. A variety of historical resources exist within the City as identified in the City's General Plan EIR. As is analyzed in the EIR, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts with implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to historical resources as well as policies included within the General Plan. 14 The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any potential impacts on historical resources beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of these existing programs and policies on individual development projects. b -d) Less than Significant Impact. As is noted in the City's General Plan EIR, given the area's previous habitation by the Luiseno people and geological conditions, there is a moderate to high likelihood for both archaeological and paleontological resources to exist within undeveloped areas within the City. The analysis in the EIR notes that less than significant impacts would occur from development pursuant to the General Plan with the implementation of existing policies and programs as well as mitigation included in the EIR and policies of the General Plan, which generally require surveying of sites for archaeological and paleontological resources and mitigation if appropriate for individual development projects. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not designate any sites that are not already designated for residential development, nor increase the intensity of development in any area. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not increase any potential impacts on archaeological or paleontological resources beyond what was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Less than significant impacts will result from the Housing Element and overall General Plan with the implementation of the mitigation General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 65 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts measures of the General Plan EIR and General Plan policies on individual development projects. It is possible that unknown human remains could be located in undeveloped areas that could be unearthed by development. If proper care is not taken during future housing project construction completed pursuant to Housing Element and Land Use Element policies, particularly during excavation activities, damage to or destruction of these unknown remains could occur. To ensure that any such materials or human remains, if found, are properly identified (and the resource recovered, if necessary), before grading or other earthmoving activities proceed in that immediate area, the City's General Plan EIR provides mitigation for halting grading activities and proper notification pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would occur. With the implementation of this existing regulation and General Plan EIR mitigation measure, impacts to buried remains would be less than significant. 66 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.6 - Geology and Soils Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or ❑ ❑ ❑ based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 __ - -------- H) Strong seismic ground shaking? H) ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ El❑ iv) Landslides? El El b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- ❑ ❑ ❑ or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), ❑ ( ❑ ®' ❑ creating substantial risks to life or property? General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 67 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? a. i) Less Than Significant Impact. Lake Elsinore is located in seismically active southern California and does contain Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones and other identified faults associated with the Elsinore fault system.15 Future housing development constructed pursuant to Housing Element policy and the Land Use Element would be subject to all applicable City, State, and local building regulations, including the California Building Code (CBC) seismic standards as approved by the Lake Elsinore Building & Safety Division. Impacts will be less than significant with the implementation of the CBC. a.ii) Less Than Significant Impact. Ground shaking can vary greatly due to the variation in earth properties. The City is subject to strong ground shaking, as is the entirety of southern California. Various strands of the Elsinore fault underlie the City as previously noted. These faults, in addition to other regional faults, are likely to produce earthquakes during the life of the project. All future projects would be susceptible to ground shaking during a seismic event and could expose persons and structure to potentially medium to strong seismic ground motion. As such, all future projects could result in a potentially significant impact with respect to strong ground shaking. Nonetheless, as discussed above in Section VI(a)(i), all future projects would be designed and constructed in compliance with all applicable City and State codes and requirements, including those established in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2. The CBC regulations are designed to protect building occupants and limit the damage sustained by buildings during seismic events. Use of these requirements is further supported by policies in the General Plan. Application of these codes and policies reduce impacts to residential development due to strong ground shaking to a less -than -significant level. a.iii) Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs when soil undergoes transformation from a solid state to a liquefied condition due to the effects of increased pore -water pressure. This typically occurs where susceptible soils (particularly the medium sand to silt range) are located over a high groundwater table. Affected soils lose all strength during liquefaction and foundation failure can occur. Portions of the City with high groundwater are noted as being rated very high and high for susceptibility to possible ground failure due to liquefaction hazards as noted in the City's General Plan with other areas rated as moderate to very low. The City recognizes the potential impacts to housing and therefore Municipal Code Chapters 17.28 and 17.32 require site specific studies for liquefaction potential and analysis of site specific design measures to limit liquefaction potential to an acceptable level in accordance with the CBC. The proposed Focus Areas and identified communities are located in areas with liquefaction susceptibility rated between very low to moderate. However, if analysis on a specific site determines liquefaction may be potential, appropriate measures that reduce the ground -shaking and liquefaction effects of earthquakes are identified in the CBC. The project does not itself involve new construction in any area of the City. All future developments will be subject to the City's standard environmental review process for evaluation of liquefaction potential and other geologic hazards. Considering implementation of existing policies and standards, impacts associated with liquefaction or other ground failure will be less than significant. 68 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a.iv) Less than Significant Impact. Portions of the City are susceptible to landslides since a substantial portion is located on slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides have historically occurred during rainstorms and earthquakes, causing steep slopes to fail. Slope failure can cause damage to structures above and below the toe of a slope. Residential development on slopes is subject to Policy 3.1 of the Land Use section and Policy 6.2 of the Seismic Activity section of the General Plan which generally require the consideration of geologic features and hazards in proposed developments. No land use changes or additional density allowances are proposed by the Housing Element or as a result of the Land Use Element amendments; let alone in the hillside areas where landslides are identified as a risk. Implementation of existing California Building Code and City practices and policies related to landslides during the environmental review process will assure that appropriate design measures and mitigation is incorporated where necessary. Implementation of these existing regulations and policies would reduce potential landslide impacts to be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Topsoil is used to cover surface areas for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation due to its high concentrations of organic matter and microorganisms. The project does not propose or authorize any particular housing development. All future residential projects are subject to environmental and engineering review, including assessment and mitigation of soil erosion. During construction activities of housing proposed pursuant to Housing Element policy or of development in accordance with the Land Use Element, there is the potential to expose surficial soils to wind and water erosion during construction activities. Wind erosion is required to be minimized through soil stabilization measures required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), such as daily watering. Water erosion will be prevented through the City's standard erosion control practices required pursuant to the California Building Code and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), such as silt fencing or sandbags. Impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. c) Less Than Significant Impact. Impacts related to liquefaction and landslides are discussed above in Section 4.6.a. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The downslope movement is due to gravity and earthquake shaking combined. Such movement can occur on slope gradients of as little as one degree. Lateral spreading typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. As discussed in Section 4.6.a.iii, future development within the City would be subject to less than significant impacts from liquefaction and other settlement hazards due to the requirement for geotechnical engineering and soils reports for future development. The CBC includes a requirement that any City -approved recommendations contained in a development's soil report be made conditions of the building permit. Standard engineering techniques are required, as appropriate, to guard against seismic -related hazards. Such techniques include excavation of collapsible soils and import of suitable fill material and foundation design methods that remain stable under settlement conditions. Impacts related to soil instability will be less than significant with the continued implementation of these regulations and practices. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The CBC requires special design considerations for foundations of structures built on soils with expansion indices greater than 20. Presence of such soils, and identification of measures to eliminate this constraint such as removal and replacement with suitable engineered materials, will be determined through site-specific geotechnical evaluations to be conducted as part of the City's routine development review procedures. Such routine procedures will apply to all future development projects including residential projects. Compliance with CBC requirements would limit hazards related to expansive soil to less than significant, and no mitigation is required. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 69 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts e) Less Than Significant Impact. Lake Elsinore has been developed with urban uses for many years, and a sewer system has been integrated into the infrastructure of much of the City. However, some more rural portions of the City are currently served by individual septic systems. Development in the Focus Areas at the intensities allowed by the General Plan would require that these projects connect to and utilize public sewer systems. Other lower density residential development pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element and the Land Use Element may develop in areas where sewer service is not readily available and would utilize individual septic systems as appropriate. These septic systems would be required to meet City requirements for septic systems as included in Chapters 16.24, 16.34, and 16.56 of the City's Municipal Code. Thus, less than significant impacts relative to the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems will result. 70 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.7 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions a) Less Than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time. Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself (i.e. changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet's surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. 16 Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the "greenhouse effect." The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth's surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re -radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 60° Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth's temperature. Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities. Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (COA, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (NZO), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. A summary of short- and long-term emissions and the analysis for each are included below. Short -Term Emissions Future development projects will result in construction. Greenhouse gas emissions will grading, paving, and other building construction short-term greenhouse gas emissions from be released by equipment used for demolition, activities. GHG emissions will also result from General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 71 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a ❑ ❑ ❑ significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the ®, purpose of reducing the emissions ❑ ❑ ❑ of greenhouse gases? j a) Less Than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time. Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself (i.e. changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet's surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. 16 Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the "greenhouse effect." The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth's surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re -radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 60° Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth's temperature. Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities. Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (COA, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (NZO), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. A summary of short- and long-term emissions and the analysis for each are included below. Short -Term Emissions Future development projects will result in construction. Greenhouse gas emissions will grading, paving, and other building construction short-term greenhouse gas emissions from be released by equipment used for demolition, activities. GHG emissions will also result from General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 71 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts worker and vendor trips to and from project sites and from demolition and soil hauling trips. Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are continuous year after year until operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference, SCAQMD recommends in its draft threshold to amortize construction emissions over a 30 -year operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be grouped with operational emissions in order to generate a precise project GHG inventory. Typically, construction -related GHG emissions contribute unsubstantially (less than one percent) to a project's annual greenhouse gas emissions inventory and mitigation is not effective in reducing a project's overall contribution to climate change. Implementation of AB32 and SB375 through California Air Resources Board's (ARB) Scoping Plan and SCAG's RTP/SCS are designed to achieve the required reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, as is further discussed in Section 4.7.b. With the cooperation and support of these plans, short-term climate change impacts due to future construction activities will be less than significant. Long -Term Emissions Future development projects will result in continuous GHG emissions from mobile, area, and other operational sources. Mobile sources, including vehicle trips to and from development projects, will result primarily in emissions of CO2, with minor emissions of CH4 and N2O. The most significant GHG emission from natural gas usage will be methane. Electricity usage by future development and indirect usage of electricity for water and wastewater conveyance will result primarily in emissions of carbon dioxide. Disposal of solid waste will result in emissions of methane from the decomposition of waste at landfills coupled with CO2 emission from the handling and transport of solid waste. These sources combine to define the long-term greenhouse gas inventory for typical development projects. To address operational emissions from a typical development project, an air quality modeling analysis is typically performed to determine if a project could regionally or locally cause a violation of any air quality standard. This analysis has already been performed associated with the City's current General Plan and its related EIR. The General Plan EIR quantifies the 2020 and 2030 operational emissions that would occur based on growth projections for the City.l' The analysis in the EIR is based on the baseline and forecasted emissions and emission reduction strategies included in the City's Climate Action Plan. Based on the implementation of the Climate Action Plan and its emission reduction strategies, the EIR determined that the General Plan would result in a less than significant impact from GHG emissions. Furthermore, GHG emissions will be evaluated during the City's standard environmental review process as required by CEQA to determine if GHG emissions from individual projects will require mitigation. Since the Housing Element and the proposed amendments to the Land Use Element would not alter any land use designations or growth projections that would alter the quantified emissions presented in the EIR, no additional impacts beyond those analyzed in the General Plan would occur. Therefore, no new or more significant impacts relative to GHG emissions would result from implementation of the Housing Element and Land Use Element update than those analyzed in the General Plan EIR. b) No Impact. Significant impacts would occur if the proposed project conflicted with or interfered with implementation of any existing greenhouse gas reduction plan that is projected to achieve greenhouse gas reduction targets. The two primary reduction plans are California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) as discussed below. In addition, the City of Lake Elsinore has adopted a Climate Action Plan that determined the City's baseline and forecasted GHG emissions and established GHG emission reduction strategies to meet the City's proportionate share of statewide emission reduction targets. 72 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan (AB32) The CARB Scoping Plan is the comprehensive plan to reach the GHG reduction targets stipulated in A1332. The key elements of the plan are to expand and strengthen energy efficiency programs, achieve a statewide renewable energy mix of 33 percent, develop a cap -and -trade program with other partners in the Western Climate Initiative (includes seven states in the United States and four territories in Canada), establish transportation -related targets, and establish fees.18 CARB estimates that implementation of these measures will reduce GHG emissions in the state by 136 MMTCO2E by 2020; therefore, implementation of the Scoping Plan will meet the 2020 reduction target of 80 MMTCO2E, which is a reduction of 27 percent compared to the projected business as usual 507 MMTCO2E. Many of the strategies identified in the Scoping Plan are not applicable at the General Plan or project -level, such as long-term technological improvements to reduce emissions from vehicles. Some measures are applicable and supported by the project. Finally, while some measures are not directly applicable, the project would not conflict with their implementation. Reduction measures are grouped into 18 action categories, as follows: 1. California Cap -and -Trade Program Linked to Western Climate Initiative Partner Jurisdictions. Implement a broad-based California cap -and -trade program to provide a firm limit on emissions. Link the California cap -and -trade program with other Western Climate Initiative Partner programs to create a regional market system to achieve greater environmental and economic benefits for California." Ensure California's program meets all applicable AB 32 requirements for market-based mechanisms. These programs involve capping emissions from electricity generation, industrial facilities, and broad scoped fuels. While it is unlikely that a qualifying heavy industrial facility such as these would be located in the City, if one were, it would be subject to these state requirements, and the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not interfere with their implementation. 2. California Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards. Implement adopted Pavley standards and planned second phase of the program. Align zero -emission vehicle, alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with long-term climate change goals. This is not applicable as this is a statewide measure establishing vehicle emissions standards. 3. Energy Efficiency. Maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards, and pursue additional efficiency efforts including new technologies, and new policy and implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California (including both investor-owned and publicly owned utilities). The City's General Plan (including Land Use Element) and proposed Housing Element promotes energy efficient building design, as well as implementation of existing building and other codes regulating minimum energy, water, and waste efficiency consistent with 2011 CALGREEN requirements and would thus be consistent and not interfere with this program. 4. Renewables Portfolio Standards. Achieve 33 percent renewable energy mix statewide by 2020. This establishes the minimum statewide renewable energy mix and is not applicable at a City level or below for implementation. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not interfere with the implementation of this program. 5. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Develop and adopt the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. This is not applicable to a City as this establishes reduced carbon intensity of transportation fuels. 6. Regional Transportation -Related Greenhouse Gas Targets. Develop regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for passenger vehicles. As is detailed following, the General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 73 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts proposed Housing Element Update would not potentially conflict with and would support the implementation of SCAG's RTP/SCS to achieve the required GHG reduction goals by 2020 and 2035 based on an inconsistency with growth projections. The existing General Plan includes policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled by encouraging mixed-use, infill, and improved jobs - housing balance, and alternative modes of transportation. 7. Vehicle Efficiency Measures. Implement light-duty vehicle efficiency measures. This is not applicable to a City as this identifies measures such as minimum tire -fuel efficiency, lower friction oil, and reduction in air conditioning use. 8. Goods Movement. Implement adopted regulations for the use of shore power for ships at berth. Improve efficiency in goods movement activities. Identifies measures to improve goods movement efficiencies such as advanced combustion strategies, friction reduction, waste heat recovery, and electrification of accessories. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not directly result in facilities such as distribution warehouses that are associated with goods movement. In addition, these measures are yet to be implemented and will be voluntary. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not interfere with their eventual implementation. 9. Million Solar Roofs Program. Install 3,000 megawatts of solar -electric capacity under California's existing solar programs. Sets goal for use of solar systems throughout the state. The proposed Housing Element would not interfere with but instead would directly support installation of alternative energy sources through its and existing General Plan policies and programs. 10. Medium- and Heavy -Duty Vehicles. Adopt medium -duty (MD) and heavy-duty (HD) vehicle efficiencies. Aerodynamic efficiency measures for HD trucks pulling trailers 53 -feet or longer that include improvements in trailer aerodynamics and use of rolling resistance tires were adopted in 2008 and went into effect in 2010.20 Future, yet to be determined improvements, includes hybridization of MD and HD trucks. The proposed Housing Element and changes to the Land Use Element would not directly result in development of industrial uses that utilize large MD and HD truck fleets. In addition, this type of development would be required to have their fleet equipment be consistent with the current applicable efficiency measures at the time of operation. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not interfere with implementation of this program. 11. Industrial Emissions. Require assessment of large industrial sources to determine whether individual sources within a facility can cost-effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other pollution reduction co -benefits. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fugitive emissions from oil and gas extraction and gas transmission. Adopt and implement regulations to control fugitive methane emissions and reduce flaring at refineries. These measures are applicable to large industrial facilities (> 500,000 MTCO2E/YR) and other intensive uses such as refineries. While it is unlikely that a qualifying heavy industrial facility such as these would be located in the City, if one were, it would be subject to these state requirements; the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not interfere with their implementation. 12. High Speed Rail. Support implementation of a high speed rail system. This is not applicable inasmuch as no high speed rail facilities are planned within the City. 13. Green Building Strategy. Expand the use of green building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California's new and existing inventory of buildings. The existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments promotes energy efficient 74 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts building design as well as implementation of existing building and other codes regulating minimum energy, water, and waste efficiency consistent with 2011 CALGREEN requirements and would thus be consistent and not interfere with this program. 14. High Global Warming Potential Gases. Adopt measures to reduce high global warming potential gases. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not directly result in generation of high global warming potential gases, and would not interfere with implementation of any future changes in air conditioning, fire protection suppressant, and other emission requirements. 15. Recycling and Waste. Reduce methane emissions at landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting and other beneficial uses of organic materials, and mandate commercial recycling to move toward zero -waste. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments are consistent since implementing development will be required to recycle a minimum of 50 percent from construction activities per state requirements. 16. Sustainable Forests. Preserve forest sequestration and encourage the use of forest biomass for sustainable energy generation. The 2020 target for carbon sequestration is 5 million MTCO2E/YR. This is not applicable as the City does not contain any areas defined as forest. 17. Water. Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and treat water. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments are consistent since implementing development will include use of low -flow fixtures and water efficient landscaping per state requirements. 18. Agriculture. In the near-term, encourage investment in manure digesters and at the five-year Scoping Plan update determine if the program should be made mandatory by 2020. The City does not contain any agricultural land use designations, and any policies related to agriculture land uses would not be applicable. As summarized above, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments will not potentially conflict with Regional Transportation -Related GHG targets and would not conflict with any of the other provisions of the Scoping Plan. The existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element and proposed Land Use Element amendments in fact support four of the action categories through energy efficiency, green building, recycling/waste, and water conservation through these proposed and current policies: Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (58375) The 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and the goals, policies, and programs included within it are projected to obtain and exceed applicable GHG reduction targets of eight percent by 2020 and 13 percent by 2035. Projected reductions by the RTP/SCS are nine percent by 2020 and 16 percent by 2035. Ultimately, the RTP/SCS is keyed to implement the requirements of AB32 at the regional level. For a program -level analysis, if the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments are consistent with the assumptions of the RTP/SCS, then long-term development within the planning area will meet regional reduction targets. Furthermore, the long-term development would meet the broader statewide reduction goals of 1990 levels by 2020 and 80 percent beyond that by 2050. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would, therefore, not contribute substantially to climate change impacts if they are consistent with the regional and statewide climate change planning efforts. As assumed in the RTP/SCS, based on current City boundaries, Lake Elsinore is forecast to grow to a total population of 70,500 by 2020 and 83,800 by 2035. Buildout of the General Plan would General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 75 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts result in a total of 94,616 dwelling units for a total buildout population of 321,694 persons, which provides for a substantially higher capacity than actual estimated population by SCAG for either 2020 or 2035. In addition, the proposed Housing Element and Focus Areas are projected to meet the City's allocated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which is a function of the City's projected long-term growth. Therefore, by complying with the RHNA, the Housing Element is contributing short-term towards consistency with long-term growth projections and the RTP/SCS. Therefore, the existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments are consistent with the population growth forecasts of the RTP/SCS because they provide the capacity for residential development to accommodate the projected population growth and not direct growth elsewhere, which would interfere with implementation of the RTP/SCS. The existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element will directly support the implementation of the RTP/SCS in achieving mandated GHG reduction targets through its policies oriented towards improvements in the region's multimodal transportation system and coordinating land use patterns around high quality transit corridors. These policies are intended to reduce reliance on automobile use and improve the jobs housing balance in more suburban communities to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not conflict with and would actually support the RTP/SCS in achieving its greenhouse gas reduction targets. In addition to these state and regional plans, the Lake Elsinore General Plan contains various programs related to energy conservation, improving air quality, reducing automobile use, and reduction of greenhouse gases. The Housing Element includes a section discussing potential energy conservation opportunities. Additionally, Southern California Edison offers various rebate programs for energy efficient appliances and makes available to residents energy efficient kits at no cost. Housing implementation programs include efforts to promote energy efficiency improvements to households, as well as energy efficient housing design and practices in City ordinances. No impact will occur. Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan The City's Climate Action Plan forecasted emissions is based on the projected growth within the City as well as the land use plan included in the General Plan. Since the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not alter any land use designations, no changes from the forecasted emissions would occur. In addition, implementation of the Housing Element and Land Use Element would not conflict with the reduction strategies included within the City's Climate Action Plan relative to transportation, energy, solid waste, community education and outreach, and the state-wide reduction strategies previously discussed under CARB's Scoping Plan. 76 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.8 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 77 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through ❑ ❑ ❑ the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and ❑ ❑ ❑ accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ❑ ❑ ®' ❑ within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑i' ❑ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport ❑ ❑ ❑ or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people ❑ ❑ ❑ residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted ❑ ❑ emergency response plan or ❑ emergency evacuation plan? General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 77 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Impact with Mitigation ❑ I ❑ Less Than No Significant Impact Impact V ❑ a) No Impact. The Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element is a policy and programmatic document intended to facilitate maintenance of the existing housing stock and production of new housing to meet the targeted housing needs of the community. Residential development does not require and is not expected to require the manufacturing, use, transportation, disposal, or storage of dangerous quantities of hazardous materials. Residential uses do not generate hazardous wastes or emissions, except for very small quantities of typical household cleaning agents, automotive maintenance products, paints, pesticides, and herbicides. The proposed Housing Element update and the Land Use Element amendments would not conflict with any hazardous materials regulations and would not exempt any future housing from the City's programs to control and safely dispose of hazardous materials and wastes or to reduce the volume of wastes requiring landfill disposal. Thus, no impact will result. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Upon completion of construction, future residential development that may be facilitated by this Housing Element update would not generate hazardous air emissions, and would not involve the handling of any acutely hazardous substances or wastes. With regard to construction, development pursuant to Housing Element policy and the Land Use Element may involve demolition of existing structures. SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires work practices that limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and disturbance of asbestos containing materials (ACM). 21 This rule is generally designed to protect uses and persons adjacent to demolition or renovation activity from exposure to asbestos emissions. Rule 1403 requires surveys of any facility being demolished or renovated for the presence of all friable and Class I and Class II non -friable ACM. Rule 1403 also establishes notification procedures, removal procedures, handling operations, and warning label requirements, including HEPA filtration, the glovebag method, wetting, and some methods of dry removal that must be implemented when disturbing appreciable amounts of ACM (more than 100 square feet of surface area). All future developments will be subject to the City's standard environmental review process for evaluation of hazards. Considering implementation of existing policies and standards, impacts associated with asbestos hazards will be less than significant. Exposure of construction workers to lead-based paint during demolition activities is also of concern, similar to exposure to asbestos. Exposure of surrounding land uses to lead from demolition activities is generally not a concern because demolition activities do not result in appreciable emissions of lead .22 If lead contamination exists on future housing sites, 8 CCR Section 1532.1 (California Construction Safety Orders for Lead) is applicable to the demolition of all existing structures requiring exposure assessment and compliance measures to keep worker exposure below action levels. The project is also subject to Title 22 requirements for the disposal 78 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of solid waste contaminated with excessive levels of lead. Impacts due to lead exposure and contamination will be less than significant with adherence to existing regulations. c) Less than Significant Impact. There are approximately twelve public schools located within the incorporated City boundaries, some of which are located within 1/4 -mile of proposed Focus Areas and community areas. Residential development does not require and is not expected to require the manufacturing, use, transportation, disposal, or storage of dangerous quantities of hazardous materials. As discussed in Section 4.8.b, existing regulations address potential off-site construction -related hazards associated with demolition of the existing onsite structures. Impact would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations listed in Section 4.8.1b. d) Less Than Significant Impact. According to the databases maintained as the 'Cortese List', the Focus Areas identified in the Housing Element update are not: • listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)'23 • listed as an open case leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),24 • listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB and CaIEPA,25 • currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) as issued by the SWRCB,26 or • developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.27 Any future development pursuant to the amended Land Use Element and Housing Element policies will be subject to the City's standard environmental review that will include identification of any contaminated site possibly not already identified and implementation of appropriate cleanup and disposal procedures; therefore, less than significant impacts related to contaminated sites will occur. This is consistent with the policies of the General Plan Public Safety and Welfare Element and the Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments which propose no changes to these safety measures. Impacts will be less than significant. e) No Impact. There are no public airports within two miles of Lake Elsinore. The nearest public airports are Perris Valley Airport located approximately 7 miles to the northeast and Hemet -Ryan Airport and French Valley Airport located both approximately 10 miles to the east and southeast respectively. No impact would result from any public airport. f) Less Than Significant Impact. Skylark Field is a private airstrip located within the southeast portion of the City. The airstrip is located within 2 miles of Focus Area 12 and the Lakeland Village community, but not within 2 miles of the other Focus Areas or communities. The area surrounding Skylark Field is primarily designated for open space or recreational uses with some areas designated for commercial, industrial or residential land uses along Mission Trail. Individual development projects would be required to analyze the potential project specific impacts related to the hazards of the private airstrip pursuant to FAA standards and guidelines for obstruction evaluation and any other pertinent standards and guidelines as is noted in the City's General Plan EIR.28 With the implementation of these existing standards and guidelines, impacts from this airstrip would be less than significant to Focus Area 12, the Lakeland Village community and any residential development within the vicinity of the airstrip pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element and Land Use Element. g) Less Than Significant Impact. The Housing Element update and amendments to the Land Use Element would not change or interfere with the emergency response plans of the City and the project components do not propose any alteration to vehicle circulation routes that could interfere with such plans. In accordance with City policies, the City will review all development proposals General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 79 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts to determine the possible impacts of each development on emergency services. Impacts will be less than significant. h) Less Than Significant Impact. A large portion of the City of Lake Elsinore is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) pursuant to the latest maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE).29 Construction of residences within Very High FHSZs will be required to comply with California Building Code requirements for fire protection in areas prone to wildfires, in particular Section 701A that will require construction with fire resistant materials and methods to minimize property damage. Fire protection services would also continue to be provided for residences in the City and is further discussed in Section 4.14. With the implementation of existing building code requirements and adequate fire protection services, impacts from wildfire on future residential development pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element and in accordance with the Land Use Element would be less than significant. 80 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.9 - Hydrology and Water Quality General Pian Amendment No. 2013-02 81 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact -- ----- Incorporation --- a) Violate any water quality standards l l or waste discharge requirements? j ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a ❑ ❑ [fi ❑ manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing j drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater ❑ j ❑ ❑ drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) otherwise substantially degrade water quality? j ❑ ❑ ❑ General Pian Amendment No. 2013-02 81 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a policy document that facilitates the production of housing and does not include any components that would change or conflict with water quality regulations or any waste discharge standards. All new development projects must comply with the City's local procedures to control storm water runoff to prevent violations of regional water quality standards, in accordance with its co -permittee obligations under the countywide municipal storm water permit program, a component of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program of the federal Clean Water Act. All future residential development must connect to sewer or adequate septic system as appropriate; direct discharges of wastewater to surface or ground waters would not be permitted. A less than significant impact will occur from development pursuant to the Housing Element and Land Use Element with the implementation of these existing requirements and procedures. b) Less Than Significant Impact. If the project removed an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduced runoff that results in groundwater recharge, a potentially significant impact could occur. The proposed project is composed of policy documents that would not authorize any specific development project, nor would it install any groundwater wells, and would not otherwise directly withdraw any groundwater. Future development is not anticipated to substantially interfere with groundwater recharge, because the City requires that storm water run-off in excess of existing conditions be directed to retention basins where the water will percolate into the ground, thereby recharging subsurface aquifers. Impacts related to groundwater recharge and depletion will be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project substantially altered the drainage pattern of an existing stream or river so that erosion or siltation would result. Various drainages traverse the City of Lake Elsinore originating from the surrounding hillsides generally towards Lake Elsinore. The project would propose no changes to any stream, river or other drainage path. With regard to future development projects proposed pursuant to Housing Element policy, site drainage plans are required by the City of Lake Elsinore and would be reviewed by the City Engineer. The final grading and drainage plans would be approved by the City Engineer during plan check review. Erosion and siltation reduction 82 Initial Study Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or ❑ ❑ ❑ Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would ❑ EJ impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including El El�j ❑ flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a policy document that facilitates the production of housing and does not include any components that would change or conflict with water quality regulations or any waste discharge standards. All new development projects must comply with the City's local procedures to control storm water runoff to prevent violations of regional water quality standards, in accordance with its co -permittee obligations under the countywide municipal storm water permit program, a component of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program of the federal Clean Water Act. All future residential development must connect to sewer or adequate septic system as appropriate; direct discharges of wastewater to surface or ground waters would not be permitted. A less than significant impact will occur from development pursuant to the Housing Element and Land Use Element with the implementation of these existing requirements and procedures. b) Less Than Significant Impact. If the project removed an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduced runoff that results in groundwater recharge, a potentially significant impact could occur. The proposed project is composed of policy documents that would not authorize any specific development project, nor would it install any groundwater wells, and would not otherwise directly withdraw any groundwater. Future development is not anticipated to substantially interfere with groundwater recharge, because the City requires that storm water run-off in excess of existing conditions be directed to retention basins where the water will percolate into the ground, thereby recharging subsurface aquifers. Impacts related to groundwater recharge and depletion will be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project substantially altered the drainage pattern of an existing stream or river so that erosion or siltation would result. Various drainages traverse the City of Lake Elsinore originating from the surrounding hillsides generally towards Lake Elsinore. The project would propose no changes to any stream, river or other drainage path. With regard to future development projects proposed pursuant to Housing Element policy, site drainage plans are required by the City of Lake Elsinore and would be reviewed by the City Engineer. The final grading and drainage plans would be approved by the City Engineer during plan check review. Erosion and siltation reduction 82 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts measures would be required during construction consistent with an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), in order to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES permit. Development adherence to General Plan policies and NPDES and construction and operational Best Management Practices (BMPs) will address and reduce impacts of potential erosion. With the implementation of these existing regulations and practices, impacts will be less than significant to drainage patterns and erosion. d -e) Less Than Significant Impact. Development on vacant lands has the potential to substantially alter drainage patterns that could result in flooding on- or off-site by increasing the rate of flow from the incorporation of impervious surfaces as well as grading that may alter drainage patterns. These potential increases in runoff also have the potential to exceed the capacity of storm drain facilities. Portions of the City are located within Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's (RCFCWCD) Sedco and West Elsinore Master Drainage Plans (MDPs). In addition, RCFCWCD is developing a new Lakeland Village MDP. These MDPs establish plans for flood control facilities that would be implemented as development occurs. Requirement for these improvements to be implemented and payment of fees by development is required by Chapters 16.34 and 16.72 of the City's Municipal Code. These also address necessary flood control and storm drain improvements where a MDP may not be adopted. Residential development typically does not generate significant water pollutants through point discharges but does contribute to water quality impacts due to community -wide and regional urban runoff. Implementation of existing and future MDPs along with the requirements of the City's municipal code will ensure that adequate infrastructure is provided to serve future residential development pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element and the Land Use Element and would thus result in a less than significant impact from on- or off-site flooding or exceeding the capacity of storm drains. f) No Impact. The project does not propose any uses that will have the potential to otherwise degrade water quality beyond those issues discussed in Section 4.9 herein. The updated Lake Elsinore Housing Element and the amendments to the Land Use Element do not authorize construction or redevelopment of any housing, and would not result in any new or more extensive sources of water pollutants. g -h) Less Than Significant Impact. Portions of the City, primarily around Lake Elsinore and major drainages, are located within 100 -year flood hazard areas.30 Portions of Focus Areas 2, 3, 4, and 6, and the Lakeland Village and Warm Springs communities are located within 100 -year flood hazard areas. Development within these areas or any other residentially -designated area would be required to provide adequate flood protection for the development either through elevating the site through grading to bring it out of the floodplain or through improvements to drainages or channels to reduce flooding impacts on a given site pursuant to General Plan policies and General Plan EIR mitigation as well as the National Flood Insurance Program. Such alteration to drainages to flood hazard areas would be required to submit and have a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to FEMA to officially bring the area out of the flood hazard area. With implementation of standard City and RCFCWCD requirements for review of flood hazards, including potentially restricting development within flood hazard areas, implementation of the Land Use Element amendments and of the policies of the Housing Element would be less than significant. i) Less than Significant Impact. Portions of the City of Lake Elsinore are subject to inundation if the Railroad Canyon dam or Diamond Valley Lake dams were to fail .31 Inundation from failure of the Railroad Canyon dam would be relatively limited to the drainage area between the dam and Lake Elsinore within the 100 -year flood hazard area. Inundation from the failure of one of the Diamond Valley Lake dams would be much more widespread and would exceed the 100 -year flood hazard areas in most areas. Portions of Focus Areas 2, 3, 4, and 6 would be located within the inundation areas of the Diamond Valley Lake dams. The risks associated with General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 83 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts dam inundation have affected the City in these same areas since the completion of the lake in 2003. In addition, the approximately 14 mile distance from the dams would provide time for emergency evacuations to occur if failure of the dams was imminent or occurred. Since dam failure can have severe consequences, FEMA requires that all dam owners develop Emergency Action Plans (EAP) for warning, evacuation, and post -flood actions. The County of Riverside's emergency response plans as administered by the County of Riverside Fire Department Office of Emergency Services along with mutual aid from local jurisdictions would implement their evacuation plans should such a dam inundation threaten the area. In addition, the National Dam Safety Act of 2006 authorized a program to reduce the risks to life and property from dam failure by establishing a safety and maintenance program. The program requires regular inspection of dams to reduce the risks associated with dam failures. Impacts due to risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, due to dam inundation will be less than significant pursuant to existing regulations on dam safety. j) Less than Significant Impact. Lake Elsinore is not subject to tsunami due to its elevation, intervening topography, and distance (over 20 miles) from the ocean. Canyon Lake is an open reservoir located to the northeast of the City. Although portions of the City may be subject to dam inundation from this reservoir, due to the distance from the reservoir and the relatively lower amount of water, impacts from potential inundation from seiche at the reservoir would likely not occur. Mudflows require a slope, water, and unconsolidated soil to occur. Portions of the City are located within or adjacent to areas of steep slopes, including Focus Areas 1, 5, 8, and 10. Standard requirements for grading design and slope stability as well as for flood protection as previously discussed in Sections 4.6 and 4.9 herein would limit any potential mudflow hazards that may be present on these areas or any other area within the City. Impacts from seiche and mudflow would thus be less than significant with the implementation of these standard requirements. 84 Initial Study 4,10 - Land Use and Planning Would the project: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ -------- - b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, ❑ El local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat I conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ El community conservation plan? a) No Impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project were sufficiently large or configured in such a way so as to create a physical barrier within an established community. The proposed Focus Areas are surrounded primarily by existing or planned residential land uses as well as industrial and commercial land uses and the proposed Land Use Element amendments recognize the boundaries of existing communities. The proposed Housing Element, which relies on existing land use designations for medium and high density residential and mixed-use development, and the Land Use Element amendments would not create any sort of physical barrier within the community. Rather, the mix of uses where allowed may serve to facilitate pedestrian connections in these areas. Furthermore, project implementation would not provide for infrastructure systems such as new roadways or flood control channels that would divide or disrupt neighborhoods or any other established community elements in this previously developed and urbanized area. Therefore, no impact will occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project were inconsistent with applicable plans, policies, and zoning designations. The proposed Housing Element update and Land Use Element amendments are consistent with existing General Plan goals and policies and the City's adopted Land Use Plan. In general, the intent of the goals and policies remains the same from the previous housing element. As required by California Housing Element law, the update provides current data on housing in the community and an analysis of the land available to meet the community's anticipated housing needs, as determined by HCD and SCAG in the RHNA. The update also includes programs for providing housing assistance and facilitating housing development. All sites and intensities identified to meet the City's RHNA are consistent with the existing Land Use Plan designations and all other pertinent policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Code. There will be no significant impact on any plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts will be less than significant. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 85 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts c) Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Checklist Response 4.4.f above, The City is located within both the MSHCP and Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and implementing development pursuant to the Housing Element and overall General Plan (including the amended Land Use Element) would be consistent with these plans. As such, a less than significant impact will occur. 86 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.11 - Mineral Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would ❑ be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? j a -b) Less Than Significant Impact. Substantial mineral resources have been identified within the City of Lake Elsinore and are noted within the City's General Plan, in particular aggregate type mineral resources. These resource areas are primarily designated as MRZ-2 pursuant to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) and California Mineral Land Classification System Diagram based on available geological information. Areas located within MRZ-2 indicated the area is underlain by mineral deposits where geologic data shows that significant measured or indicated resources are present. Some of these areas are currently being mined, such as the Pacific Clay Products area that is located within the Alberhill Specific Plan and Focus Area 11. Other identified resource areas have already been developed with residential land uses. The mining in Focus Area 11 is being phased out in accordance with approved permits and ultimate reclamation of the area and would be developed eventually pursuant to the specific plan. The phasing out of these mining operations and designation of alternate future land uses has already occurred through the currently adopted General Plan. The proposed Housing Element and the proposed Land Use Element amendments would not further alter these designations or plans for phasing out existing mining operations. In addition, the City's General Plan EIR determined that impacts to mineral resources would be less than significant from implementation of the General Plan and its designated land uses with its policies for protection of mineral resources. 12 With the implementation of these existing plans as well as General Plan policies to protect mineral resources in other areas of the City, less than significant impacts will occur. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 87 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.12 - Noise Would the project result in: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ❑ ❑ ❑ without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels ❑ ❑ ( ❑ existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working El El El the project area to excessive noise levels? Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise The primary sources of noise affecting Lake Elsinore stem from various modes of transportation. Because the City is divided by Interstate 15 and various arterial streets, most areas of the City are affected by traffic noise. Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. Sound (and therefore noise) consists of energy waves that people receive and interpret. Sound pressure levels are described in logarithmic units of 88 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ratios of sound pressures to a reference pressure, squared. These units are called bels. In order to provide a finer description of sound, a bel is subdivided into ten decibels, abbreviated dB. To account for the range of sound that human hearing perceives, a modified scale is utilized known as the A -weighted decibel (dBA). Since decibels are logarithmic units, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by ordinary arithmetic means. For example, if one automobile produces a sound pressure level of 70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dB. In fact; they would combine to produce 73 dBA. This same principle can be applied to other traffic quantities as well. In other words, doubling the traffic volume on a street or the speed of the traffic will increase the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. Conversely, halving the traffic volume or speed will reduce the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. A 3 dBA change in sound is the level where humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound and a 5 dBA change is generally readily perceptible .33 Noise consists of pitch, loudness, and duration; therefore, a variety of methods for measuring noise has been developed. According to the California General Plan Guidelines for Noise Elements, the following are common metrics for measuring noise :34 LEQ (Equivalent Energy Noise Level): The sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time -varying signal over given sample periods. LEQ is typically computed over 1-, 8-, and 24-hour sample periods. CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): The average equivalent A -weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00pm to 10:00pm and after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night from 10:00pm to 7:00am. LDN (Day -Night Average Level): The average equivalent A -weighted sound level during a 24- hour day, obtained after the addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00pm and before 7:00am. CNEL and LDN are utilized for describing ambient noise levels because they account for all noise sources over an extended period of time and account for the heightened sensitivity of people to noise during the night. LEQ is better utilized for describing specific and consistent sources because of the shorter reference period. Fundamentals of Environmental Groundborne Vibration Vibration is sound radiated through the ground. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called groundborne noise. The ground motion caused by vibration is measured as particle velocity in inches per second, and in the U.S. is referenced as vibration decibels (VdB). The background vibration velocity level in residential and educational areas is usually around 50 VdB. The vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels for many people. Sources within buildings such as operation of mechanical equipment, movement of people, or the slamming of doors causes most perceptible indoor vibration. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible groundborne vibration are construction equipment, steel -wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the groundborne vibration from traffic is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration velocity level, and 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. The general human response to different levels of groundborne vibration velocity levels is described in Table 4.12.1 (Human Reaction to Groundborne Vibration). General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 89 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Table 4.12.1 nse to t3roun000rne viorarion 65 VdB I Approximate threshold of perception for many Approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and 75 VdB distinctly perceptible. Many people find that transportation - 85 VdB I Vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, May 2006 a) Less Than Significant Impact. The Lake Elsinore General Plan identifies standards for land uses and noise compatibility, as summarized in Table 4.12.2 (Noise and Land Use Compatibility Standards). In addition, the General Plan establishes additional interior and exterior noise standards as shown in Table 4.12.3 (Interior and Exterior Noise Standards). Table 4.12.2 Noise and Land Use Comnatibilitv Standards Land Use Categories Day -Night Noise Level LDN Categories Uses <55 60 65 70 75. 80> Single, Family, Duplex, Multiple Residential Family A A B B C D D Residential Mobile Homes A A B C C D D Commercial Regional District Hotel Motel Transient Lodging A A B B C C D Commercial Regional Commercial, Retail, Bank, Village, District Special Restaurant Movie Theatre A A A A B B C Office Building, Research and Commercial, Industrial Development, Professional Institutional Offices City Office Building A A A B B C D Commercial Regional, Institutional Civic Amphitheatre, Concert Hall, Center Auditorium Meeting Hall B B C C D D D Children's Amusement Park, Miniature Golf Course, Go-cart Track, Equestrian Center, Commercial Recreation Sorts Club A A A B B D D Automobile Service Station, Commercial General, Auto Dealership, Special Industrial Manufacturing, Warehousing, Institutional Wholesale Utilities A A A A B B B Hospital, Church, Library, Institutional General Schools Classroom A A B C C D D Open Space Parks A A A B C D D 90 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Land Use Categories Day -Night Noise Level LDN Categories Uses <55 60 65 70 75 80> Land Use Categories LDN Uses Interior Exterior —Categories Single Family, Duplex, Multiple Family Mobile Homes Golf Course, Cemeteries, 60 Mobile Homes - 604 Residential Hotel Motel Transient Lodging_.._.455 Nature Centers, Wildlife Hospital, School's classroom 45 - Commercial, Institutional Church Library 45 - Open Space Reserves Wildlife Habitat A A A A B C C Agriculture Agriculture A A A A A A A Interpretation Zone A Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any Clearly buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any Compatible special noise insulation requirements. Zone B Normally New construction or development should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and needed nose insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will Compatible normaliv suffice. Zone C Normally New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features Incompatible included in the design. Zone D Clearly Incompatible New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Table 4.12.3 Tnterinr and Exterior Noise Standards The primary contributor to ambient noise in the planning area is traffic, particularly from Interstate 15 and major roadways. Since the proposed Housing Element and the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 91 Energy Average Land Use Categories LDN Uses Interior Exterior —Categories Single Family, Duplex, Multiple Family Mobile Homes 45 3' 5 60 Mobile Homes - 604 Residential Hotel Motel Transient Lodging_.._.455 - Hospital, School's classroom 45 - Commercial, Institutional Church Library 45 - Interpretation 1. Indoor environment excluding: Bathrooms, toilets, closets, corridors. 2. Outdoor environment limited to: Private yard of single family, multi -family private patio or balcony which is served by a means of exit from inside, Mobile Home Park. 3. Noise level requirement with closed windows. Mechanical ventilating system or other means of natural ventilation shall be provided as of Chapter 12, Section 1205 of UBC. 4. Exterior noise level should be such that interior noise level will not exceed 45 CNEL. 5. As per California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Division T25, Chapter 1, Subcha ter 1 Article 4 Section T25-28. The primary contributor to ambient noise in the planning area is traffic, particularly from Interstate 15 and major roadways. Since the proposed Housing Element and the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 91 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts amendments to the Land Use Element would not make any additional land use changes that are not already designated by the General Plan, nor result in any substantial traffic or other noise sources as analyzed in the General Plan EIR, the analysis included within the General Plan EIR would also apply to the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments. Future developments in the proposed Focus Areas and in other areas of the City are subject to the policies of the existing General Plan designed to minimize noise impacts to residential properties. The General Plan EIR determined that existing and proposed residential land use areas may be subject to noise levels higher than the acceptable levels based on buildout conditions and projected future traffic conditions. The EIR determined that these impacts could result in significant noise impacts on existing land uses. However, policies incorporated into the General Plan and mitigation in the EIR would require new residential development to address potential noise, in particular traffic noise, impacts on new dwelling units and residents and provide adequate mitigation where necessary on a project specific basis.35 Since the Housing Element and the proposed Land Use Element amendments would not increase any of the impacts as analyzed in the General Plan EIR, with the implementation of the General Plan policies and mitigation included in the EIR, impacts will be less than significant in potential exceedances of noise standards. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Groundborne vibration can result in impacts from minor annoyances to people to major shaking that damages buildings. There are no railways within the City. The primary source of groundborne vibration within the City would be heavy construction activities. According to the Caltrans "Transportation- and Construction -Induced Vibration Guidance Manual", transportation sources are not a significant source of vibration and therefore are not discussed below. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack -hammering, and demolition -related activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration impacts if large bulldozers or large trucks are used. Housing does not utilize machinery that would generate substantial amounts of vibration. The construction of future potential housing developments could utilize machinery that would generate substantial amounts of ground vibration because multiple -lot housing developments generally require mass grading. Construction of future development could require rock blasting considering certain areas may contain large rocks or require substantial grading as well as piling driving since various areas within the City may be subject to liquefaction hazards. Table 4.12.4 (Common Construction Vibration) summarizes vibration levels from common construction equipment. Impacts to structures can occur from 0.08 PPV to 2.00 PPV depending on the duration of the vibration and the age of the structure. Similarly, human annoyance to vibration can occur from 0.01 PPV to 2.00 PPV depending on the duration. Table 4.12.4 Common Construction Vibration E u merit : PPY in ,sec at 2Sft. Crack -and -Seat Operations 2.400 Vibratory Roller 0.210 Large Bulldozer 0.089 Caisson Drilling 0.089 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Jackhammer 0.035 Small Bulldozer 0.003 Source: California Department of Transportation 2004 92 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Vibration impacts are temporary and rare except in cases where large equipment is used near existing, occupied development. Construction noise and associated vibration will be controlled through the time restrictions currently established in the City's Noise Control requirements. Section 17.176 of the City's Municipal Code establishes noise standards for construction activity that occurs between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. based on various impacted land use types in place of the normal noise standards as shown previously in Table 4.12.3. Therefore, potential construction -related vibration impacts would be minimized to daytime hours. Per standard practice and City policy for noise analysis, future development projects that utilize vibration - inducing equipment, in particular when located near sensitive uses/buildings, will be analyzed individually for potential vibration impacts. Typical vibration mitigation includes routing and placement of equipment to maximize distance to receptors and use of alternative equipment, such as use of drilled, sonic, or vibratory pile drivers as opposed to impact drivers. Subsurface dampeners can also be utilized to reduce groundborne vibration. With implementation of existing regulations, policies, and practices, impacts related to exposure to groundborne vibration will be less than significant. C) Less Than Significant Impact. Residential land uses do not typically produce excessive noise either individually or cumulatively that could substantially increase existing, ambient noise levels. The future development of the Focus Areas and other development that is consistent with the Land Use Element will increase ambient noise levels due to increased traffic generation in the project vicinity. Project specific increases in ambient noise levels due to future development on residential designated properties will be evaluated as development is proposed over the long-term pursuant to existing policies and procedures. With these existing policies and procedures, impacts related to increases in ambient noise levels will be less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element and the proposed amendments to the Land Use Element do not authorize development or the redevelopment of housing units on any particular site but does include policies that could facilitate future development. Temporary increases in local noise levels would be associated with construction activities related to development. Construction noise will be controlled through the time restrictions and construction noise standards currently established in the City's noise control requirements. The updated Housing Element and amendments to the Land Use Element would not result in any new or more severe temporary noise impacts associated with construction than was already analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. Continued enforcement of the City's noise restrictions will reduce temporary noise impacts associated with new housing construction to a less -than -significant level. e) No Impact. The City is not located within two miles of any existing public airport or within any airport land use plan; therefore, the City, the proposed Focus Areas and the identified communities are not anticipated on being affected from noise generated from any public airport. No impact would occur. f) Less Than Significant Impact. Skylark Field is a private airstrip located within the southeast portion of the City. The airstrip is located within 2 miles of Focus Area 12 and the Lakeland Village community, but not within 2 miles of the other Focus Areas and communities. The area surrounding Skylark Field is primarily designated for open space or recreational uses with some areas designated for commercial or residential land uses along Mission Trail. Individual development projects would be required to analyze the potential project specific impacts related to noise from the private airstrip pursuant to the City's noise standards as noted in General Plan policies and the General Plan EIR. With the implementation of these existing standards and policies, noise impacts from this airstrip would be less than significant to Focus Area 12, the Lakeland Village community and any residential development within the vicinity of the airstrip pursuant to the policies of the Housing Element. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 93 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.13 - Population and Housing Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ❑ ❑ ❑ (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? 1 a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments will not directly result in population growth. Population growth is a complex interaction between immigration, emigration, birth, deaths, and economic factors. The proposed Housing Element is designed to guide and accommodate the inevitable population growth the community will face over the short- and long-term. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. The Census indicated that the City had a population of 28,930 in 2000 and 51,821 as of 2010, which would represent an approximately 79% increase. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) estimated a 2008 population for Lake Elsinore of 50,200 and projects an estimated population of 70,500 and 93,800 by 2020 and 2035, respectively. The Focus Areas identified in the Housing Element would result in a net increase of approximately 5,925 new dwelling units and 20,145 new residents (5,925 dwelling units at 3.4 persons per household). This increase is within the growth assumptions estimated by SCAG and therefore will be adequate in accommodating future residential growth. In addition, the proposed Housing Element and Focus Areas are projected to meet the City's allocated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which is a function of the City's long-term growth projected by SCAG. Impacts will be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element is designed to encourage and facilitate housing development and preserve and enhance existing housing stock. The City is far from built -out and has numerous vacant properties that would likely accommodate the vast majority of development pursuant to the Housing Element, including the Focus Areas which are vacant. Therefore, future development of the Focus Areas and other housing development constructed pursuant to the Housing Element update will have less than significant impacts on the 94 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts displacing a substantial number of housing units. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. C) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not displace any people because the project does not authorize the demolition or conversion of any housing unit. No housing units currently exist within the Focus Areas. In addition, the Housing Element does not authorize the acquisition of any existing residential dwelling unit. Furthermore, the proposed Housing Element will have a less than significant effect on economic factors that could require the construction of new housing such as the relocation of a large employment base to a different region. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. The impact will be less than significant. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 95 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.14 - Public Services Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a -e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Lake Elsinore Housing Element update sets forth policies and programs to encourage housing development consistent with adopted land use polices of the existing General Plan. Residential development constructed pursuant to Housing Element policy will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection, schools, and parks. SCAG estimates that the City's population will be 93,800 in 2035. The Housing Element's goal to facilitate 5,925 very low to above moderate income units by 2021 would increase the local housing stock from 16,253 as of 2010 (2010 Census count) to 22,178 units and would increase the resident population by approximately 20,145 persons (5,925 dwelling units at 3.4 persons per household). The General Plan EIR indicates that buildout of the land use plan would result in less than significant impacts to parks, schools, fire, or police services .36 The provision of parks is guided by the policies of the General Plan Community Form Element and parks and Recreation Master Plan that promotes additional parks to support the City's growing population that will ensure that adequate parks public services are provided. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. The provision of school services is completely mitigated through the payment of development impact fees pursuant to the Leroy F. Green School Facilities Act. Future potential plans for development will be reviewed by City staff to determine any impacts of development on emergency services and are also subject to review by Lake Elsinore's Police and Fire Departments for compliance with applicable standards and policies. Future potential plans for development are also subject to the policies of the General Plan Public Safety and Welfare Element. The Public 96 Initial Study Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ a -e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Lake Elsinore Housing Element update sets forth policies and programs to encourage housing development consistent with adopted land use polices of the existing General Plan. Residential development constructed pursuant to Housing Element policy will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection, schools, and parks. SCAG estimates that the City's population will be 93,800 in 2035. The Housing Element's goal to facilitate 5,925 very low to above moderate income units by 2021 would increase the local housing stock from 16,253 as of 2010 (2010 Census count) to 22,178 units and would increase the resident population by approximately 20,145 persons (5,925 dwelling units at 3.4 persons per household). The General Plan EIR indicates that buildout of the land use plan would result in less than significant impacts to parks, schools, fire, or police services .36 The provision of parks is guided by the policies of the General Plan Community Form Element and parks and Recreation Master Plan that promotes additional parks to support the City's growing population that will ensure that adequate parks public services are provided. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. The provision of school services is completely mitigated through the payment of development impact fees pursuant to the Leroy F. Green School Facilities Act. Future potential plans for development will be reviewed by City staff to determine any impacts of development on emergency services and are also subject to review by Lake Elsinore's Police and Fire Departments for compliance with applicable standards and policies. Future potential plans for development are also subject to the policies of the General Plan Public Safety and Welfare Element. The Public 96 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Safety and Welfare Element policies are designed to ensure adequate provision of public services in response to long-term growth. Property taxes and other special taxes paid by future property owners will also support the incremental expansion of public services as the population in the City grows. Impacts to public services will be less than significant with the implementation of these impact fees and review of individual development projects. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 97 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4,15 - Recreation Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might ❑ ❑ ❑ have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 4.14.d, the project has the potential to result in the indirect need for recreational facilities due to the promotion of housing development. However, Lake Elsinore requires development to either dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu of dedication to offset incremental impacts of development on existing parks pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 16.12 and 16.34. Any future housing development will be required to pay development impact fees in accordance with this existing regulation; thus deterioration of existing parks and recreation facilities will be less than significant as a result of future housing development because parks and recreation facilities will be incrementally expanded to meet future residential demand. b) Less than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element and the Land Use Element amendments would not result in the direct construction of any recreation facilities. Future potential construction of recreation facilities in response to incremental, long-term population increases will be subject to the City's standard environmental review process pursuant to CEQA. Local recreation facilities typically do not result in significant impacts. Impacts related to the potential construction of future recreation facilities will be less than significant. 98 Initial Study 4.16 - Transportation and Traffic Would the project: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized ❑ ❑ ❑ travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other ❑ ❑ ( ❑ standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change ❑ ❑ ❑ ®' in location that results in substantial safety risks? d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) ❑ ❑ ❑ or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency i access? ❑ ❑ j ❑ General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 99 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the ❑ ❑ ❑ performance or safety of such facilities? a -b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element and the proposed amendments to the Land Use Element will not directly result in construction of any development or infrastructure; however, future development supported by the policies of the updated Housing Element and the Land Use Element will result in additional traffic. Since the Housing Element and the proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans would not alter any land use designations that would alter the traffic impacts presented in the General Plan EIR, no additional impacts beyond those analyzed in the General Plan would occur. The General Plan EIR found that with the recommended roadway and intersection improvements that all roadways and intersections would have an acceptable Level of Service (LOS). Although, since the improvements cannot be guaranteed the EIR determined that a potentially significant impact could occur from buildout of the General Plan without all of the recommended improvements implemented and would thus also potentially conflict with the Riverside County Transportation Commission Congestion Management Plan for provision of adequate LOS .37 Individual residential development pursuant to the existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element will be required to analyze their individual and cumulative traffic impacts and provide for the necessary traffic improvements related to their individual project as recommended by the General Plan and mitigation in the EIR. With the implementation of these, impacts from the Housing Element and the amendments to the Land Use Element would not exceed those analyzed in the General Plan EIR determined to be potentially significant and would thus be less than significant. c) No Impact. The updated Housing Element is focused on achieving local housing objectives and does not authorize any construction that would result in the need to redirect or otherwise alter air traffic patterns. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Furthermore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments will not result in substantial population growth that could significantly increase air traffic. Therefore, the project will have no air traffic impacts. d) No Impact. The project does not involve the construction of any roadway and would have no effect on the City's street and site design standards. e) Less than Significant Impact. The project does not involve any road construction or any development activity and thus will not obstruct or restrict emergency access to or through the City. Future housing development facilitated by implementation of Housing Element policies will be subject to site plan review. In conjunction with the review and approval of building permits, the Fire Department reviews all plans to ensure compliance with all applicable emergency access and safety requirements. With continued application of project review procedures, impacts involving emergency access will be less than significant. f) No Impact. The project includes program new housing units to meet the City's regional f "island" communities, a! projects for construction will not conflict with any required by State law of new development or policy regarding public t and policies to encourage the development of it share of housing and to identify "fringe" and but would not authorize any design, plans, or redevelopment housing. Thus, the project itself 'ansit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Individual 100 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts development projects will be required to analyze their specific impacts and consistency with the policies and plans. The project will have no impact on policies or plans regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 101 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.17 - Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which ❑ ❑ ❑ could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and ❑ ❑ ❑ resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate ❑ ❑ ❑ capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid ❑ ❑ ❑ waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations ❑ ❑ ❑ [y]' related to solid waste? a) No Impact. Wastewater treatment services for Lake Elsinore are provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). Wastewater discharge requirements (WDR) are issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). These treatment requirements 102 Initial Study Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control ❑ ❑ ❑ Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction ❑ ❑ ❑ of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which ❑ ❑ ❑ could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and ❑ ❑ ❑ resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate ❑ ❑ ❑ capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid ❑ ❑ ❑ waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations ❑ ❑ ❑ [y]' related to solid waste? a) No Impact. Wastewater treatment services for Lake Elsinore are provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). Wastewater discharge requirements (WDR) are issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). These treatment requirements 102 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts establish pollutant limits for effluent discharges to receiving waters. Future development will result in typical wastewater discharges and will not require new methods or equipment for treatment that are not currently permitted. Furthermore, residential development is not subject to point -source discharge requirements. The project will not impact compliance with RWQCB treatment requirements. Future development will not interfere with compliance with RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements, thus no impact will occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. Future development will incrementally increase water demand and wastewater discharges. As determined by the City's General Plan EIR, less than significant impacts would occur to existing water and wastewater treatment facilities .38 The proposed Housing Element and Focus Areas and identification of "fringe" and "island" communities would not alter any land use that could increase development intensity that could potentially create a greater impact than was already analyzed by the General Plan EIR. The City and EVMWD will continue to identify the need for expansion of water and wastewater facilities, such as water and sewer mains, as needed, on a project -by -project basis during its standard environmental review process. Any environmental impacts related to the construction or expansion of water or wastewater facilities will be analyzed and mitigated for at the time of development. Adherence to existing practices and procedures will result in impacts related to the expansion of water and wastewater facilities that are less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element is focused on achieving local housing objectives and does not authorize any construction that would result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. The proposed Land Use Element amendments to the District Plans do not change any applicable land use designations and do not propose or anticipate any specific development proposals. Therefore, these amendments will not result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. Drainage improvements are constructed on a project -by -project basis. This typically involves routing a major drainage course through a project by concentrating the flow into an acceptable drainage facility. Construction of drainage devices will be entirely on- site and will be subject to standard construction requirements for erosion control and water quality requirements. Future development will comply with existing standards and regulations for conveyance of storm water, thus a less than significant impact to the environment from construction of storm drain infrastructure will occur. d) Less than Significant Impact. EVMWD is responsible for the production and distribution of domestic water and maintenance of the overall water system facilities throughout the City. The City's General Plan EIR determined that adequate existing water entitlements would be adequate to serve the land uses anticipated by the General Plan land use plan. The proposed Housing Element and Focus Areas and the proposed amendments to the Land Use Element would not alter any land use that could increase development intensity that could potentially create a greater impact than was already analyzed by the General Plan EIR. The proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not result in any population growth or additional demand on water supplies but rather will guide development to accommodate anticipated growth in the community through the year 2021; therefore, the proposed Housing Element and Land Use Element amendments would not result in the need for new or expanded water supplies and impacts will be less than significant. e) Less Than Significant Impact. Wastewater treatment requirements are established by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The City will review future housing development as part of their standard environmental review process to determine adequate capacity to serve the discharge needs in comparison to treatment plant capacity. Impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity are anticipated to be less than significant. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 103 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts f) Less Than Significant Impact. Lake Elsinore is served by a number of landfills, including EI Sobrante Landfill, Badlands landfill, and Lamb Canyon Landfill. EI Sobrante Landfill is expected to reach capacity by 2045. Badlands Landfill is expected to reach capacity by 2024 and Lamb Canyon Landfill by 2021. Both Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills have the potential to expand their facilities and capacity. Solid waste disposal is managed at the regional level; therefore, generation of solid waste within the City and SOI is one part of a regional issue. Compliance with City and County waste reduction programs and policies would reduce the volume of solid waste entering landfills. Individual development projects within the City would be required to comply with applicable State and local regulations, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50 percent. Future development would increase the volume of solid waste generated in the City that is diverted to existing landfills, thus contributing to the acceleration of landfill closures or the use of more distant sites. The City will continue to implement solid waste reduction programs in compliance with Section 40050 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code. Each development will be required to comply with federal, State, and local statues and regulations related to the disposal of solid waste. Impacts will be less than significant. g) No Impact. Waste collection in Lake Elsinore is disposed of in regional landfills, as described above. All new development will be required to comply with State mandates and City regulations regarding reduction/recycling of household waste. None of the proposed housing strategies inherent in the proposed Housing Element or amendments to the Land Use Element would have any effect upon or result in any conflicts with solid waste disposal regulations. No impact will occur. 104 Initial Study Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.18- Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Less Than Significant Impact. The results of the preceding analyses and discussions of responses in the preceding analysis have determined that the proposed project would have no effect upon sensitive biological resources and would not result in significant impacts to historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources. Impacts related to scenic resources will be less than significant. The project is a policy document that will not have any direct environmental impacts. All residential development facilitated by Housing Element policy will occur pursuant to adopted General Plan land use policy and other General Plan policies intended to minimize environmental impacts. Impact would be less than significant with the implementation of these existing General Plan policies. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Cumulative impacts can result from the interactions of environmental changes resulting from one proposed project with changes resulting from other past, present, and future projects that affect the same resources, utilities and infrastructure systems, public services, transportation network elements, air basin, watershed, or other physical conditions. Such impacts could be short-term and temporary, usually consisting of overlapping construction impacts, as well as long term, due to the permanent land use changes involved in the project. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 105 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ ❑ ❑ community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) 11 Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ❑ ®i' ❑ cumulatively considerable? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects ❑ ❑ ❑ on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Less Than Significant Impact. The results of the preceding analyses and discussions of responses in the preceding analysis have determined that the proposed project would have no effect upon sensitive biological resources and would not result in significant impacts to historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources. Impacts related to scenic resources will be less than significant. The project is a policy document that will not have any direct environmental impacts. All residential development facilitated by Housing Element policy will occur pursuant to adopted General Plan land use policy and other General Plan policies intended to minimize environmental impacts. Impact would be less than significant with the implementation of these existing General Plan policies. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Cumulative impacts can result from the interactions of environmental changes resulting from one proposed project with changes resulting from other past, present, and future projects that affect the same resources, utilities and infrastructure systems, public services, transportation network elements, air basin, watershed, or other physical conditions. Such impacts could be short-term and temporary, usually consisting of overlapping construction impacts, as well as long term, due to the permanent land use changes involved in the project. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 105 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Overall, the long term development of the Housing Opportunity sites is consistent with the growth projections identified in the regional population growth forecast completed by SCAG. As such, the proposed Housing Element update would not result in new or additional cumulative impacts. The proposed amendments to the General Plan's Land Use Element District Plans do not change any land use designations set forth in the General Plan. With the implementation of General Plan policies and mitigation included in the General Plan EIR at the project -level, the cumulative impacts would be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. Based on the analysis of the project's impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17, there is no indication that this project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. The analysis herein concludes that direct and indirect environmental effects will at worst require implementation of existing General Plan policies and General Plan EIR mitigation measures to reduce to less than significant levels. Under each environmental consideration addressed in the preceding analysis, the proposed project is considered to have little or no adverse impacts on people and the environment. 106 Initial Study 5 References 5.1 - List of Preparers City of Lake Elsinore (Lead Agency) Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 951-674-3124 • Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager MIG I Hogle-Ireland (Environmental Analysis) 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 951-787-9222 • Christopher Brown, Director of Environmental Services • Russell Brady, Project Associate General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 107 5.2 - Notes ' City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report, 2011. 2 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Riverside County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic highways/index.htm [Accessed May 9, 2013] 3 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 2008. The City of Lake Elsinore is indicated either as Other Land, Urban and Built -Up Land, Grazing Land, or Farmland of Local Importance in 2010 maps of western Riverside County. 4 California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program, 2011/2012. 5 USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Region. EvegTile53B_02_03_v2 and EvegTi le54_02_03—v2. 2007. 6 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Management Plan. December 2012. 7 Southern California Association of Governments. Integrated Growth Forecast. http://www.scag.ca.gov/forecast/`index.htm [Accessed May 13, 2013] s City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 9 United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. www.epa.gov/oar/oagps/greenbk/index.html [Accessed May 13, 2013] 10 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 11 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. http://107 20.228 18/Wetlands/WetlandsMapper.html# [Accessed May 14, 2013] 12 US Fish & Wildlife Services. Conservation Plans and Agreements Database. http://ecos.fws.gov/consery plans/public.issp [Accessed May 14, 2013] 13 California Department of Fish and Game. Summary of Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs). http:/Zwww.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/nccp/ [Accessed May 14, 2013] 14 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 16 California State Department of Conservation. California Geological Survey, Aiquist-Prioio Earthquake Fault Zone Maps. 16 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009. '7 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 18 California Air Resources Board. Climate Change Scoping Plan. December 2008 19 California Air Resources Board. California GHG Emissions — Forecast (2002-2020). October 2010 20 California Air Resources Board. Scoping Plan Measures Implementation Timeline. October 2010 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. Amended October 5, 2007 22 California Department of Toxic Substances. Draft Lead Report. June 2004 23 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor. <www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search.asp> [Accessed May 14, 2013] 24 California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. <geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov> [Accessed May 14, 2013] 25 California State Water Resources Control Board. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. <www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/CurrentList.pdf> [Accessed May 14, 2013] 26 California State Water Resources Control Board. List of Active CDO and CAO. < http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/CDOCAOList.xlsx > [Accessed May 14, 2013] 108 Initial Study 27 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Facilities Subject to Corrective Action. <www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/SectionA.htm#Facilities> [Accessed May 14, 2013] 28 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 29 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps. <http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire prevention/fire_prevention_wildiand_zones.php> [Accessed May 14, 2013] 30 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan. Public Safety and Welfare Element. 2011 31 Riverside County GIS Data. 2011. 32 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 33 California Department of Transportation. Basics of Highway Noise: Technical Noise Supplement. November 2009 34 California Governor's Office of Planning and Research. General Plan Guidelines. 2003 35 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 36 City of Lake Elsinore, General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 37 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. 38 City of Lake Elsinore. General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report. 2011. General Plan Amendment No. 2013-02 109 Chapter 6 CITY OF ,WOO."I LADE LSMOkE DREAM E,)(TREME CITY OF LA E LSINOD'P TM DREAM EXTREME City of Lake Elsinore 2014-2021 Housing Element Consultant to the City: MIG I Hogle-Ireland, Inc. © <0 Hoole- Ireland July 2013 RECEIVED JUL 0 S 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GFNFR.AL: PLAN Chapter 6 This page intentionally left blank. CITY LAKE OLSINOU DREAM ExTREME C IT Y OF L A K E ELS I MORE GENE RAL PLAN Chapter 6 Table of Contents CITY Of LAKE LSINORE -� n DREAD M EXTREME 6.0 Housing Element.....................................................................................1 6.1 Introduction..............................................................................................1 Purpose and Organization.........................................................................1 State Requirements and Legislative Changes...........................................1 General Plan Consistency.........................................................................3 Community Outreach and Input.................................................................3 Data Resources.........................................................................................4 6.2 Community Profile and Housing Needs Assessment ..........................5 Population Trends......................................................................................5 Income and Employment.........................................................................12 SpecialNeeds Groups.............................................................................19 HousingProfile........................................................................................24 Projected Housing Need..........................................................................39 6.3 Housing Constraints Analysis..............................................................41 Market Constraints...................................................................................41 Governmental Constraints.......................................................................46 Environmental Constraints.......................................................................82 6.4 Housing Resources — Site Inventory and Analysis ............................85 Regional Housing Needs Allocation(RHNA)...........................................85 6.5 Housing Element Plan.........................................................................135 Housing Goals, Policies, and Programs................................................136 Quantified Objectives by Income Group................................................143 6.6 Review of Past (2008-2014) Accomplishments.................................145 CITY OF LAKE E LS I NORE GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF n^n LADE LSIIYOIZE ?j DREAM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN CITY OF Chapter 6 6.0 Housing Element 6.1 Introduction LSIlYOIZE DREAM EXrREME The Housing Element is one of seven mandatory elements of the General Plan. It provides an action -plan for maintaining and expanding the housing supply in the City of Lake Elsinore, available to all economic segments in the community. Recognizing the role of land use planning in local governments' provision of affordable housing, State law requires the Housing Element to include a comprehensive strategy for providing affordable housing over the planning period. Affordable housing is defined as housing that is designated for and affordable to low- and moderate -income households. Cities and counties in California prepare their Housing Elements by consulting State Law, the existing General Plan, and community stakeholders. The result is a comprehensive strategy for providing affordable housing over the planning period. Purpose and Organization Lake Elsinore's Housing Element for the planning period of January 1, 2014 to October 1, 2021 describes policies, programs, and incentives including: • Identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs, resources and constraints; • A statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for preservation, improvement and development of housing; • Adequate provision for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community, including very low, lower, moderate and higher incomes; and • Identification of adequate sites for housing. State Requirements and Legislative Changes The California Legislature states that a primary housing goal for the State is ensuring every resident has a decent home and suitable living environment. Section 65580 of the California Government Codes describes the goal in detail: C I T Y O F L A K E ELS I N O R E GENERAL PLAN I Chapter 6 CITY Or .�� LADE LSIIYORE DREAM a. The availability of housing is of vital statewide importance, and the early attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every Californian, including farm -workers, is a priority of the highest order. b. The early attainment of this goal requires cooperative participation of government and the private sector in an effort to expand housing opportunities and accommodate the housing needs of Californians of all economic levels. c. The provision of housing affordable to low- and moderate -income households requires the cooperation of all levels of the government. d. Local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for housing needs of all economic segments of the community. e. The Legislature recognizes that in carrying out this responsibility, each local government also has the responsibility to consider economic, environmental, and fiscal factors, and community goals set forth in the general plan, and to cooperate with other local governments and the state in addressing regional housing needs. Section 65581. of the California Government Code reflects the Legislative intent for mandating that each City and County prepare a Housing Element: a. To assure that counties and cities recognize their responsibilities in contributing to the attainment of the state housing goal. b. To assure that counties and cities will prepare and implement housing elements which, along with federal and state programs, will move toward attainment, of the state housing goals. c. To recognize that each locality is best capable of determining what efforts are required by it to contribute to the attainment of the state housing goal, provided such a determination is compatible with the state housing goal and regional housing needs. d. To ensure that each local government cooperates with other local governments in order to address regional housing needs. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE 2 GEN ERAL PLAN Chapter 6 Crry oe LAKE � LSINOP E � DREAM State law requires housing elements to be updated every four or eight years to reflect a community's changing housing needs; eight-year planning cycles are available to jurisdictions that adopt their housing element within the prescribed statutory deadline. The Government Code also requires that each draft Housing Element be reviewed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development and that the Department's findings be incorporated prior to adoption, or that specified findings be made in response to the Department's comments. In response to changing State law pertinent to housing elements, this updated Housing Element addresses the housing needs in the City of Lake Elsinore including without limitations, an analysis of the housing needs for developmentally disabled persons as required by S13812. General Plan Consistency The Lake Elsinore General Plan, adopted in December 2011, includes the seven mandatory elements combined into a smaller number of integrated chapters. This Housing Element is consistent with the General Plan's policies and proposals. The Housing Element, for example, draws upon the development capacity levels given in the Community Form Element to determine the appropriate location for affordable housing development. The City will ensure consistency between the Housing Element and the General Plan, and as new policies are introduced, they will be consistent with existing elements. If any General Plan elements are updated, the Housing Element can also be modified to maintain consistency within the General Plan. Community Outreach and Input Section 65583(c)(8) of the Government Code requires local government make "a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element." This process not only includes residents of the community, but also coordinates participation among local agencies and housing groups, community organizations, and housing sponsors. The result is more informed policies and programs for providing affordable housing. In Lake Elsinore, an article was included in the City's Fall/Winter 2012 Activity Guide, to solicit input from residents on any housing concerns. The public was also invited to participate in the update process at a public workshop/joint Planning Commission and City Council workshop, held on February 12, 2013. In addition, the public was invited to review the Draft Housing Element which was made available on the City website throughout the update process. C IT Y OF L A K E E L S 1 NORE G ENERAL PLAN 3 Chapter 6 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FEEDBACK CITY OF r��4 LADE CpLSIAOIZE REME The Community Workshop on February 12, 2013 was held to ensure that the community's housing concerns, including low- and moderate -income and special needs residents, were addressed. In addition to standard noticing published by the City, individual invitation letters were distributed to agencies and organizations that serve the low and moderate -income and special needs communities in Lake Elsinore. Included in the invitations were: • Housing Authority of the County of Riverside • Fair Housing Council of Riverside County • City of Lake Elsinore Senior Activities Center • Civic Partners - Lake Elsinore • H.O.P.E. (Helping Our People in Elsinore) • Lake Elsinore Citizen Committee • Lake Elsinore NAACP Branch 1034 • Riverside County Office on Aging • National Community Renaissance • California Housing Partnership Corporation • Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing • BRIDGE Housing Corporation • Chamber of Commerce No written or public comments were received at the Community Workshop. Data Resources Data from a variety of resources were used in the crafting of the Housing Element. One of the most cited sources is the 2010 Census The Census provides consistent demographic characteristics that are widely accepted. California Department of Finance 2012 Population and Housing estimates supplement the 201.0 Census data. Additional information has been drawn from the 2012 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, which is drawn from American Community Survey 2005-2009 Estimates. CHAS data is based on special tabulations for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) from sample Census data. CITY OF LAKE E LSINORE R GENERAL P LAN Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE LSIHOU DREAM ,2 Community Profile and HousingNees Assessment The Housing Needs Assessment provides the foundation for establishing the objectives, policies, and programs for addressing housing needs in the City of Lake Elsinore. This assessment addresses population characteristics, employment patterns, and income levels. The information illustrates how Lake Elsinore has grown and changed, and helps the City identify patterns and trends relevant to housing policies and programs. Projections show how the community demographics are expected to change over the coming years. The following sources were used to generate this demographic and housing profile of Lake Elsinore: • U.S. Bureau of the Census • U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) • Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) • California State Department of Finance • Various other sources Population Trends Lake Elsinore has experienced rapid population growth over the past two decades, as has most of Riverside County. In order to meet the future housing needs of the growing population it is important to analyze the current housing and population trends for the City of Lake Elsinore. To clarify the type of housing that will be needed to meet anticipated future demand, Housing Element law requires an assessment of population and employment trends. Characteristics such as age, ethnicity, and employment influence the type and cost of housing needed or in high demand. Tracking demographic changes helps the City better plan for, respond to, or anticipate changing housing demand. C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E 5 GENE RAI. PLAN Chapter 6 POPULATION GROWTH CITY OF LAKE �� �21 LSIIYOR.E REAM EX1REME Between 1990 and 2000, as reported by the Census, the population of Lake Elsinore grew approximately 58 percent, from 18,285 to 28,930 residents. The 58 percent increase is substantial, but is similar to other cities in Riverside County that have experienced increases in population due to the relative affordability of the area in comparison with Los Angeles and Orange Counties (see Table 1 for further information). Between 2000 and 201.0, Lake Elsinore continued to experience strong growth, with a 2010 population of 51,812 persons. The City of Murrieta experienced greater increases in population than Lake Elsinore during this same time period, and Norco, Riverside, Corona, Temecula, and Hemet experienced less growth than Lake Elsinore. Table 1 Population Growth: Lake Elsinore and Surrounding Cities (1990- 2010) jurisdiction 1990 2000 20101 % Change 1990-2000 % Change 2000-2010 Riverside 226,505 255,166 303,871 13% 19% Corona 76,095 124,966 152,374 64% 22% Temecula 27,099 57,716 100,097 113% 73% Murrieta3 - 44,282 103,466 - 134% Hemet 36,094 58,812 78,657 63% 34% Lake Elsinore 18,285 28,930 51,521 58% 79% Norco 23,302 24,157 27,063 3.7% 12% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Note: Murrieta incorporated in 1991, therefore did not have a 1990 Census population count The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) periodically publishes growth forecasts for the fourteen member jurisdictions, as well as unincorporated Riverside County within the sub -region. The most recent growth forecast (from 2012) projects a 2020 population in Lake Elsinore of 70,500, and increasing to 93,800 persons by 2035 (see Table 2). C I T Y O F L A K E ELS I NORE GENERAL PLA N 0 Chapter 6 Table 2 CRY OF LADE 0,LSINOIZE DREA Projected Population and Housing Growth in Lake Elsinore: Population Housing Units Growth Percent Growth Percent Year Number Change Number Change 2020 70,500 36% 21,000 29% 2035 93,800 33% 28,700 37% Source: SCAG 2012 Riverside County Growth Forecast Note: Percent change for 2020 population based on comparison to 2010 report by the U.S. Census (51,821 persons and 16,253 housing units). In addition to population projections, several other demographic characteristics and trends define housing needs. Among these characteristics are age composition, racial and ethnic composition, and household size. AGE DISTRIBUTION Population age distribution serves as an important indicator of housing needs, because housing needs and preferences change as individuals or households grow older. Young families tend to focus more on cost and the ability to become first-time homebuyers. Cost and access to services are important to seniors because they may be on fixed incomes and have mobility limitations. Table 3 shows the age distribution of Lake Elsinore residents, as reported by the 2000 and 2010 Censuses. In 2010, the 0-9 year-old age group constituted the largest age group at approximately 18 percent, immediately followed by the school age group at 17.9 percent. Comparing the City's age distribution with that of California as a whole, the data show that the older adult age groups (60+) comprise a relatively small proportion of the population in Lake Elsinore (9.1 percent of the City's population compared to 16.3 percent statewide). The City has a much higher younger population than the statewide average; 36 percent of the City's population is under 19 years in age, in comparison with 28 percent statewide. The City's population of 45-64 year olds has increased by five percentage points from 2000. The large proportion of working adults and school-age children and the small senior population means that demand will likely continue to grow for larger units for families. CITY OF LAKE ELS W O R E GENERAL PLA N 7 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE LSINOKE -�= DREAD MFxTRFME Table 3 Age Distribution of Population: Lake Elsinore and Statewide Age Group 2000 Number Percent Number 2010 Percent Statewide 0-9 Years 6,057 20.9% 9,431 18.2% 13.5% 10-19 Years 5,196 18.0% 9,237 17.9% 14.6% 20-24 Years 1,849 6.4% 3,583 6.9% 7.4% 25-34 Years 4,245 14.7% 7,761 15.0% 14.3% 35-44 Years 5,026 17.4% 7,970 15.4% 13.9% 45-54 Years 3,048 10.5% 6,758 13.0% 14.1% 55-59 Years 883 3.1% 2,345 4.5% 5.9% 60-64 Years 691 2.3% 1,771 3.4% 4.9% 65-74 Years 1,136 3.9% 1,842 3.6% 6.1% 75-84 Years 636 2.2% 854 1.6% 3.7% 84+ Years 161 0.6% 269 0.5% 1.6% Median Age 28.7 - 29.8 - - Total 28,928 100% 51,821 100% 100% Source: U.S. Census 2000, 2010 RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION Table 4 shows the racial/ethnic distribution of population in Lake Elsinore and Riverside County at large. The populations of each race are very similar in the City and County. The largest difference between the County and City is that 48.4 percent of the City's population identify themselves as a person of Hispanic origin, while 45.5 percent of the County population does the same. This difference is less than three percent and reflects that the City is representative of the County at large in ethnic composition. C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R F G E N E R A L P L, A N 8 Chapter 6 CITY OF LADE LSIlY01ZE DREAM Table 4 Race and Ethnicity in Lake Elsinore and Riverside County (2010) City of Lake Elsinore Riverside County Racial/Ethnic Group Number Percent Number Percent One Race 48,632 93.8% 2,084,977 95.2% White 31,067 60.0% 1,335,147 61.0% African-American 2,738 5.3% 140,543 6.4% American Indian and Alaska Native 483 0.9% 23,710 1.1% Asian 2,996 5.8% 130,468 6.0% Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander 174 0.3% 6,874 0.3% Other 11,174 21.6% 448,235 20.5% Two or More Races 3,189 6.2% 104,664 4.8% Total 51,821 100% 2,189,641 100% Persons of Hispanic Origin (of any race) 25,073 48.4% 995,257 45.5% Source: U.S. Census 2010 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS Household type and size, income level, the presence of persons with special needs, and other household characteristics may affect access to and demand for housing and housing programs. This section details the various household characteristics in Lake Elsinore. Household Type and Size Household characteristics and types can impact the type of housing needed. For instance, single -person households often occupy smaller apartment units or condominiums. Married couples often prefer larger single-family homes, particularly if they have children. This CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 9 Chapter 6 CITY OF nl" LAKE � LSINOIZE L DREAM underscores the need to provide a diversity of housing to give households of different ages and types the opportunity to live in Lake Elsinore. The U.S. Census Bureau defines a household to include all of the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home or trailer, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied as separate living quarters, or if vacant, intended for occupancy as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. Table 5 Household Growth Trends and Projections Year Households Numerical Change Percent Change 1990 6,066 - _ 2000 8,818 2,752 45% 2005 11,793 2,975 34% 2010 15,239 3,446 29% 2020 21,022 5,783 38% 2035 28,662 7,640 36% Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000; SCAG 2008 Regional Transportation Plan Growth Forecast, by City According to the 2010 U.S. Census, an average of 3.48 people lived in a Lake Elsinore household. This represents 3.9 percent increase from the 3.27 average in the 2000 U.S. Census. Not only did the average household size rise, the total number of households rose as well, from 8,818 to 15,239 in 2010 (Table 5). Between the years 2000 and 2010, the number of households increased by 73 percent. The number of households increased most likely due to the relatively lower-priced homes in comparison with Los Angeles and Orange Counties (see the Housing Issues discussion). Lake Elsinore's average household size of 3.48 is higher than that of Riverside County as a whole, which averaged 3.14 persons per household. This is most likely due to the high number of families living in the City. Over three-quarters of the households in Lake Elsinore consist of families. The data in Table 6 indicates that Lake Elsinore appears to be a stable, family-oriented community, with 80.9 percent of all households classified as families in 2010. The City has a higher number of family households than the County (74 percent), and much higher than the C I T Y OF LAKE E LS I NORE GENE RAI. PLAN 10 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE 'LSI DREAM EXTREME State (68.7 percent), and the nation (68.7 percent). The proportion of family households in Lake Elsinore has increased since 2000, when it was 78 percent. Table 6 Household Characteristics Household Type 2000 Number Percent 2010 Number Percent Percent Change Total Households 8,818 100% 14,788 100% 68% Families 6,874 78% 11,961 80.9% 74% Families with Own Children 4,335 49% 7,195 48.7% 66% Non -Families 1,943 22% 2,827 19.1% 45% Renter -Occupied 3,086 35% 5,027 34% 63% Owner -Occupied 5,732 65% 9,761 66% 70% Average Household Size 3.27 3.48 6.4% Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010 As identified in Table 6, family households increased by 74 percent, an increase of nearly 5,087 families. Non -family households also increased, but much less dramatically at a rate of 45 percent. Table 7 compares household size by renter and owner between 2000 and 2010. Based upon this information, it appears the need for two and three bedroom units is still important as in both 2000 and 2010 the majority of households consisted of 2-4 people. In addition, there was a significant increase in households with five or more members, making larger units of three or more bedrooms increasingly important to accommodate these households, especially renters. CITY OF LAKE ELS I N O R E GEN E RA L PLAN 11 Chapter 6 Table 7 Household Size by Tenure CITY OF � LAKE �LSI1.10 E D EA F,rr RFMF People per Household Renter 2000 Owner Renter 2010 Owner Renter Percent Change Owner Percent Change 1 630 796 690 1262 10% 59% 2 623 1,613 908 2564 46% 59% 3-4 1,129 2,015 1887 3652 67% 81% 5+ 736 1,275 1542 2283 1.10% 79% Total 3,118 5,699 5027 9761 61% 71% Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010 Income and Employment Household income is the most important, although not the only factor, affecting housing opportunity because it determines a household's ability to purchase or rent housing, and to balance housing costs with other necessities. Income levels vary considerably among households, affecting preferences for tenure, location, and housing type. While higher -income households have more discretionary income to spend on housing, low- and moderate -income households have a more limited choice in the housing they can afford. Income Profile According to the 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates (ACS), the median household income for Lake Elsinore was $63,726, exceeding the Riverside County's median income of $57,768. Figure 1 shows that, in comparison with the County, Lake Elsinore has a smaller proportion of residents earning less than $25,000 per year. Lake Elsinore's residents earning between $25,000 and $35,000 is comparable in size to the County. Lake Elsinore has a larger proportion of residents earning between $50,000 and $150,000 than the County. In the wealthiest categories where households are earning more than $150,000 per year, the trend reverses with the County having a higher number of households in this category than Lake Elsinore. CITY OF LAKE E LSINORE GENERAL PLAN 12 Chapter 6 Crry OF LADE �LSIAOIZE �REA� M ECT REME For housing planning and funding purposes, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) uses five income categories to evaluate housing need based on the Area Median Income (AMI) for the County*: • Extremely Low -Income Households earn up to 30 percent of AMI • Very Low -Income Households earn up to 50 percent of AMI • Low -Income Households earn up to 80 percent of AMI • Moderate -Income Households earn up to 120 percent of AMI • Above Moderate -Income Households earn over 120 percent of AMI Figure 1 Household Income Distribution, 2010 $0 to $14,999 City and County Income Analysis to $15,000 $24,999 $25,000 to $34,999 ar $35,000 to $49,999v ■ Lake Elsinore E sn c © Riverside County u $50,000 to $74,999 - WN via $75,000 to $99,000 i $100,000 to $149,999 ti� wKsvN $150,000 or morexZ iZ3C 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 0.0% 20.0% 25.0% Percentage of Total Incomes Source: U.S. Census 2010 *Actual incomes within each category are adjusted for family size by HCD in accordance with adjustment factors adopted and amended from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) special Census tabulations developed for HUD provide a specific breakdown of household income adjusted for family CITY OF LAKE E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 13 Chapter 6 CITY OF nle��M LAKE �LSII`IOIZE DREAM F.1CTRGMG size. According to the CHAS, over 13 percent of the City's total households are classified as extremely low income (less than 30 percent of AMI), 11 percent are classified as very low income (approximately 31-50 percent of AMI), and nearly 17 percent are classified as low income (approximately 51-80 percent AMI). However, the majority of the City of Lake Elsinore households (61 percent) are classified as moderate income (greater than 80 percent of AMI) or greater. Tenure is closely correlated with income, as those households with lower incomes usually cannot afford to buy a home (Table 8 and Figures 2 and 3). Table 8 Household Income by Tenure Income Category Total Households Percent Renter Percent Owner Percent Extremely Low Income (30% or less) 11% 19.6% 7% Very Low Income (>50%) 10% 17.5% 7% Low Income (>50%) 17% 25% 14% Moderate Income (>50%) 61% 37.6% 71% Total' 100% 100% 100% Source: State of Cities Data Systems: Comprehensive l -Lousing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Data, 2005-2009 Notes: 1. Numbers are rounded and therefore may not result in 100% 2. Income ranges are approximate percentages. Actual income limits for Riverside County are promulgated annually by HUD and published by California HCD. CITY OF LAKE E LS INORE GENERAL. PLAN 14 Chapter 6 Figure 2 Household Income- Renter Moderate/ Above Moderate Income Low Income Very Low Income Extremely Low Income CITY OF - LAKEj5, LSIROKE �94J DREAM 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Number of Households ■ Elderly ® Small Families ® Large Families El All Others SOURCE: HUD CHAS DATA BOOK (BASED ON 2000 CENSUS) Moderate/ Above Moderate Income Low Income Very Low Income Extremely Low Income Figure 3 Household Income- Owner 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Number of Households ■ Elderly ® Small Families 1l Large Families ® All Others SOURCE: HUD CHAS DATA BOOK (BASED ON 2000 CENSUS) C I T Y O F L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 15 Chapter 6 Employment Trends CITY OF LAKE LSINOP E -�3 DREAM The City of Lake Elsinore has historically depended upon tourism for an employment base. However, the City has expanded the employment opportunities to include jobs within commercial and industrial businesses. Residents who work within Lake Elsinore are primarily employed in services positions, manufacturing businesses, construction, and retail trade. This is consistent with the major employers in the City of Lake Elsinore (see Table 9), which include the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center and Lake Elsinore Unified School District. C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E 16 G E N E R A L P L A N Chapter 6 Table 9 Major Employers Number of Company Employees Business Type CITY OF LADE 0LSII iOIZE DREA Lake Elsinore Unified School School District District 1,526 Lake Elsinore Outlet Center 1,169 Retail Outlet Mall Stater Bros. Market 305 Supermarket Wal-Mart 245 Retail Costco 201 Retail Lake Elsinore Storm/Golden Professional Baseball Club 200 State Concession Medley Communications 175 Cable TV Shirt WERX/Innovative Advertising Merchandising 160 EVMWD 170 Water District Home Depot 160 Retail Riverside Public Social Services 160 Government Target 150 Retail Lake Elsinore Hotel & Casino 150 Restaurant/Casino Lake Chevrolet 116 Car Dealership Lowe's 106 Retail Source: Lake Elsinore 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report According to the United States Census 2010, there is an estimated 21,271 residents of Lake Elsinore with jobs. This number increased over 87 percent from 2000, when 11,352 residents reported having jobs. The increase in the number of residents with jobs in the City from 2000 to 2010 (87 percent) is fairly similar with the population increase in the City from 2000 to 2010, which was 79 percent. Table 10 shows the type of occupations held by Lake Elsinore residents. The majority of residents are employed within the educational services, health care and social assistance, retail trade, and manufacturing. Professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 17 18 CITY OF Chapter 6 LADE —� LSINORE ` DREAM management services is the next highest category, with construction jobs the fifth highest occupation. Table 10 Major Industries Industry Description Number of Employees Percent Educational services, and health care and social assistance 3,665 17.2% Retail trade 2,861 13.5% Manufacturing 2,649 12.5% Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 2,331 11.0% Construction 2,228 10.5% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 2,116 9.9% Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 1,291 6.1% Other services, except public administration 1,141 5.4% Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 1,106 5.2% Public Administration 718 3.4% Wholesale Trade 577 2.7% Information 395 1.9% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 193 0.9% TOTAL 21,271 100% Source: US Census Bureau 2010 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENF, RAL PLAN 18 Chapter 6 Special Needs Groups CITY OF ,�� LADE '' LSIN0RE g r_ nktn� M ��trReMe Certain groups have more difficulty finding decent, affordable housing due to their special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one's income earning potential, family characteristics, the presence of physical or mental disabilities, or age-related health issues. As a result, certain groups typically earn lower incomes and have higher rates of overpayment for housing, or overcrowding. A central goal of the Housing Element is to assist in the housing of persons with special needs. Elderly According to the 2010 Census, 2,965 senior residents (individuals 65 and older) lived in Lake Elsinore, representing 5.7 percent of the population. This was a 1,032 person increase over the 2000 Census figures. Although the number of seniors increased, the proportion of the City's population that is composed of seniors decreased one percentage point, from 6.7 percent in 2000 to 5.7 percent in 2010. The City has 1,845 senior households,' of which 17 percent were renters and just over 83 percent were homeowners. Many elderly persons have limited income potential, as they are most often retired and have fixed incomes (retirement funds and Social Security income). Within the City of Lake Elsinore senior population, the vast majority (81 percent) who rent have incomes that are classified as low-income or below (80 percent of the AMI or less), while 62 percent of seniors that own homes were classified as low-income or below. This poses a special problem with regard to housing affordability. Disabled Both mentally and physically disabled residents face housing access and safety challenges. Disabled people, in most cases, are of limited incomes, often receiving Social Security income only, with housing costs taking the majority of their monthly income. Because people with disabilities spend a higher percentage of income on housing, overcrowding is frequent as housing expenses are shared with others, oftentimes live-in caretakers. In addition, adults often have the problems of securing and paying for childcare. They may have the further burden of obtaining an education or training for themselves to increase their incomes and their ability to find affordable housing. In addition, disabled persons may face difficulty finding accessible housing (housing that is made accessible to people with disabilities through the positioning of Households of one or two people. Source: HUD CHAS Data Book 2005-2009 (based on U.S. Census 2010) CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 19 Chapter 6 CITY OF � LADELSIHOIZE VDREAM Table 12 Special Needs Households Female -Headed Female -Headed Large Households - Households with Own Characteristics Households' No Husband Children Total Households 3,825 2,140 1,343 % of all households' 26% 14% 9% Renters 40% 51% 62% Owners 60% 49% 38% Source: U.S. Census 2010 1. City Total Households equals 14,788 2. Large households have five or more members, including both family and non -family households Large Households In general, large households (with five or more members) are identified as a group with special housing needs based on the limited availability of adequately sized, affordable housing units. Large households are often of lower income, frequently resulting in the overcrowding of smaller dwelling units and in time, accelerating unit deterioration. The 2010 Census reported 3,825 large households (five or more members) in Lake Elsinore, of which 23 percent own their home. These households are usually families with more than two children or families with extended family members such as in-laws or grandparents living in the same housing unit. According to Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, 70 percent of large -family owners and 78 percent of large -family renters experienced one or more housing problems. Housing problems include overcrowding, cost burden, and substandard conditions. Female -Headed Households Single -parent households require special consideration and assistance because of the greater need for day care, health care, and other services. Female -headed households with children particularly tend to have lower incomes, thus limiting housing availability for this group. In addition, these households have a greater need for accessible daycare and other supportive services. In 2010, 2,140 female -headed households lived in Lake Elsinore, representing 14 percent of all households. Female -headed households with children made up nine percent of all households. C I T Y O E L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 22 Chapter 6 Farmworkers CITY OF LADELSIAOIZE ilv-- DREAM According to the 2010 Census, only 193 residents of Lake Elsinore have jobs in the "Agricultural, Farming, Forestry, Fishing and Mining" industries. This number has increased by 126 since the 2000 census, however is still relatively insignificant compared to the other industries. Furthermore, many of these workers may be permanent employees in the mining industry. Historically, the City of Lake Elsinore's economy was linked to tourism, not agriculture. Homeless Persons The 201.1. County of Riverside Homeless Count was conducted by several agencies and led by the County Department of Public Social Services. The count revealed a population of approximately 6,203 homeless in Riverside County on January 24-25, 2011. In Lake Elsinore, estimates are approximately 113 homeless persons on City streets on a given night. This represents approximately 2 percent of the County's homeless population. The 2013 Homeless Point in Time Count is being held on January 23, 2013. These statistics are estimates and should be used with caution, as the potential margin of error is likely high, as recognized by the County of Riverside Homeless Count 2011? The Department of Housing and Urban Development utilizes the federal definition of homeless (The United States Code, Title 42, Chapter 119, Subchapter I §11302). Homeless is defined as: 1. An individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; and 2. An individual who has a primary nighttime residence that is — A. A supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including welfare hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional housing for the mentally ill); B. An institution that provides a temporary residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized; or C. A public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. "A point -in -time (PIT) homeless enumeration has an inherent bias of not capturing homeless persons who experience short episodes of homelessness during other times of the year." County of Riverside Homeless Count 2011. C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N 0 R E G .E N E RA L. P L A N 23 Chapter 6 CITY OF �� LADE Cq?LSINORE DREAM There are numerous factors that contribute to homelessness in the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County. Difficulties in obtaining employment, insufficient education, mental illness, and substance abuse are a few of the more traditional factors. The lack of affordable housing in the region has particularly been a problem since the 1980s. The 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) estimates that the number of people living at or below the poverty line in Lake Elsinore is 1.3.2 percent, which is similar to the poverty level of Riverside County at large (13.4 percent). The high cost of housing in the region and the number of persons living in poverty combine to create a serious potential for homelessness. In response to the growing needs of the homeless population in Riverside County, the Continuum of Care (COC) process began in 1994. The Department of Community Action established a Continuum of Care Workforce in 1998. The City of Lake Elsinore is included within the COC geographic area B, which also includes other Riverside County cities located along the Interstate 15 freeway corridor. Despite the overwhelming need for emergency shelters in Riverside County, there are only a total of 543 full time shelter beds, available in the entire region, according to the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) in 2012. Each year, between November Pt and March 3111 the Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program (ECWSP) provides emergency shelter for homeless persons who cannot gain admittance into regular full time housing. California National Guard Armories are used for the ECWSP, as well as other suitable facilities as needed. Housing Profile This section addresses characteristics of the housing supply in Lake Elsinore, including type, age, condition, and availability. Housing Stock Residential construction activities in the City have increased at a rate of 71 percent (6,748 units) from 2000 to 2010. This exceeds the construction rate in Riverside County, which has occurred at a rate of 37 percent (216,033 units). Table 13 compares the growth rate of Lake Elsinore to other cities in Riverside County, and to Riverside County at large. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE GENERAL PIAN 24 Chapter 6 Table 13 Housing Unit Growth CITY OI LADE LSINOIZE �� naen Jurisdiction 2000 2010 Percent Change 2000 - 2010 Corona 39,271 47,174 20% Norco 6,277 7,322 17% Lake Elsinore 9,506 16,253 71% Murrieta 14,921 35,294 137% Temecula 19,099 34,004 78% Riverside County 584,674 800,707 37% Source: US Census 2000, 2010 Housing Types Lake Elsinore was developed as a community of single-family dwelling units and has primarily remained as such. The percentage of multiple -family units being built in comparison to single- family units has steadily decreased since 1990. Between 2000 and 2012 only 854 multiple family units were built in the City in comparison to 6,098 single family units built. Single-family structures now make up 79.2 percent of the City's housing stock, with multi -family comprising 16.4 percent and mobile homes and other housing filling out the remaining 4.4 percent. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE GENERAL PLAN 25 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE Cq?LSIN0 E n DREAM Table 14 Housing Unit Types 1990 2000 2012 2000- 2012 Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Change Housing Type of Units of Total of Units of Total of Units of Total in Units Source: CA Department of Finance, 2000 and 2012, US Census 1990 Tenure Housing tenure refers to whether a unit is occupied by its owner or by a renter. Table 15 shows that the ratio of owners to renters in Lake Elsinore has stayed fairly consistent in the City between 2000 and 2010. Sixty-six percent of Lake Elsinore residents owned the home in which they lived in 2010. This speaks to the stability of the City's residential neighborhoods. The City's housing stock was developed with the intention of providing reasonably priced, detached single-family home ownership opportunities. This trend has continued from 1990, with the percentage of homeowners steadily increasing within the City over the past 20 years. CITY OF LAKE ELS W O R E GENERAL PLAN 26 Single -Family Detached 3,673 52.6% 6,214 65.4% 12,207 74.3% 96.4% Single -Family Attached 687 9.8% 707 7.4% 812 4.9% 14.9% Total Single -Family 4,360 62.4% 6,921 72.8% 13,019 79.2% 88.1% Multi -Family 2-4 Units 583 8.4% 735 7.7% 1,025 6.2% 39.5% Multi -Family 5+ Units 1,071 15.3% 1,099 11.6% 1,663 10.1% 51.3% Total Multi -Family 1,654 23.7% 1,834 19.3% 2,688 16.4% 46.6% Mobile Homes, Trailer & Other 967 13.9% 751 7.9% 727 4.4% 3.2% Total 6,981 100.0% 9,506 100.0% 16,434 100% 72.9% Source: CA Department of Finance, 2000 and 2012, US Census 1990 Tenure Housing tenure refers to whether a unit is occupied by its owner or by a renter. Table 15 shows that the ratio of owners to renters in Lake Elsinore has stayed fairly consistent in the City between 2000 and 2010. Sixty-six percent of Lake Elsinore residents owned the home in which they lived in 2010. This speaks to the stability of the City's residential neighborhoods. The City's housing stock was developed with the intention of providing reasonably priced, detached single-family home ownership opportunities. This trend has continued from 1990, with the percentage of homeowners steadily increasing within the City over the past 20 years. CITY OF LAKE ELS W O R E GENERAL PLAN 26 Chapter 6 Table 15 Tenure and Vacancy CITY OF LADE LSI11 RE —� DREAD M EXTREME Tenure 2000 2010 Percent Percent of Total of Total Percent Number Occupied Number Occupied Change Total Occupied 8,818 100.0% 14,788 100.0% 67.7% Owner Occupied 5,699 64.6% 9,761 66.0% 71.3% Renter Occupied 3,118 35.4% 5,027 34.0% 61.2% Vacancy Rate 2000 2010 Rental 2.5% 6.8% Owner 2.1% 4.6% Overall Vacancy Rate 7.2% 9.0% Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010 Vacancy The vacancy rate indicates a relationship between supply and demand. Four percent is considered to be a healthy vacancy rate - one that permits sufficient choice among a variety of housing units - although a healthy rate can be as low as two percent for ownership units and as high as five to six percent for rental units. A limited vacancy rate is an indication that demand for housing is outpacing supply and usually results in higher housing costs, reducing housing opportunities for lower-income households. The 2010 U.S. Census reported that the City of Lake Elsinore had a vacancy rate of nine percent, a slight increase from the 2000 vacancy rate of 7.2% but lower than the 1990 vacancy rate of 13.1%. This vacancy rate is indicative of the foreclosure crisis that affected the region and the nation at large. As the recession wanes, vacancy rates are anticipated to decrease. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL. PLAN 27 Chapter 6 HOUSING ISSUES Housing Condition CITY OF ,tom LAKE 6i 0? —� DREAD M F,XTR&ME The age and condition of Lake Elsinore's housing stock is an indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as a new roof, foundation work, plumbing, electrical or other structural or major components. The age of the housing stock, as defined by the year the units were built, is shown in Table 16. As of 2010, approximately 23 percent of all the housing units in the City were built before 1980, whereas approximately 77 percent of the units in Lake Elsinore were built between 1980 and 2010. Based on these figures, it is evident that the majority of Lake Elsinore's housing has been constructed within the past 30 years, meaning that most housing should not need major rehabilitation at this time. However, by the end of this planning period (2021), approximately 43 percent of the City's existing housing stock will exceed 30 years in age and some rehabilitation needs are likely among the 3,211 houses constructed between 1980 and 1989. Table 16 Age of Housing Stock Year Constructed Number Percent 2005 or later 3,014 19.2% 2000-2004 3,007 19.1% 1990-1999 2,870 18.3% 1980-1989 3,211 20.4% 1970-1979 1,596 10.2% 1960-1969 845 5.4% 1950-1959 376 2.4% 1940-1949 189 1.2% 1939 or earlier 599 3.8% Total 15,679 100% Source: 2006-2010 ACS 5 -year estimates The City has an ongoing program to identify, determine the condition of, and initiate rehabilitation or demolition proceedings. For example, in 2012, 15 units within the City of Lake Elsinore have been identified as needing rehabilitation or demolition pending funding. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE G E N F. RAL PLAN M Chapter 6 CITY Or LADE r�2,LSII10IZE -�6t DREAM V The Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program through Riverside County is not available for the fiscal year July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013, however this Program may be available in subsequent fiscal years. If so, Lake Elsinore homeowners will be eligible for assistance in rehabilitating or repairing homes. Overcrowding In response to a mismatch between household income and housing costs in a community, some households may not be able to buy or rent housing that provides a reasonable level of privacy and space. Residents may accept smaller -sized housing or double up with other families to afford housing costs. An overcrowded household is defined as one with more than one person per room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways and porches. Severely overcrowded households are those with more than 1.5 persons per room. Overcrowding contributes to increases in traffic and on -street parking within a neighborhood and accelerates deterioration of homes and infrastructure. Table 17 shows some overcrowding in Lake Elsinore. As indicated by the American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates, approximately six percent of all housing units in the City were overcrowded. Rates of overcrowding are more pronounced for renter households than for owner households. Approximately 11 percent of all renter -occupied units are overcrowded while only 5 percent of owner -occupied units are overcrowded. Approximately 1.8% of all renter -occupied units and approximately 1 percent of owner -occupied units are severely overcrowded. According to the 2000 Census, 15 percent of all households in the City were overcrowded, which means that the problem has lessened between 2000 and 2010. The City's 2010 overcrowding rate of six percent was consistent with the County as a whole, which was approximately seven percent. C IT Y OF L A K E E L S I N O R E 29 G E N E R A L P L AN Chapter 6LAKE CITY OF � LSIlYOKE -� ` UREA Table 17 Overcrowding by Tenure % of all Number of % of all Number of % of all Housing Housing Renter Renter Owner Owner Units Units' Units Units2 Units Units Overcrowded (1 - 1.5 persons/room) 724 5% 477 11% 247 2.5% Severely Overcrowded 0.5 persons/room) 127 1% 80 1.8% 47 .5% Total Overcrowded (>1 personslroom) 851 6% 557 12.8% 294 3% Source: 2006-2010 ACS 5 year estimate Housing Costs The cost of housing in a community is directly correlated to the number of housing problems and affordability issues. High housing costs can price low-income families out of the market, cause extreme cost burdens, or force households into overcrowded or substandard conditions. Ownership Housing The Lake Elsinore median home price in 2011, based information provided by DataQuick Information System, was $185,000 (see Table 18). This was 2.37 percent lower than the median price in 2010. The median home price in Riverside County as a whole in 2011 was $10,000 higher than in Lake Elsinore. Median housing prices in Lake Elsinore have stayed fairly consistent from 2010 to 2011, similar to other neighboring cities. Much of the region has experienced a decline in home prices following the sub -prime mortgage market collapse of 2007. In 2007, the median home price in Lake Elsinore was $380,000; the median for Riverside County at large was $395,000. Between 2007 and 2011, home prices in Lake Elsinore fell by nearly $200,000, which represents a 51 percent decrease. C I T Y O F L A K E ELS I NORE GENE RAL PLAN 30 Chapter 6 Table 18 Riverside County Median Home Prices CITY OF A LAKE �LSIlYOKE DREAM Location 2010 2011 % Change Lake Elsinore $189,500 $185,000 -2.37% Corona $330,000 $315,000 -4.55% Murrieta $244,000 $240,000 -1.64% Norco $331,000 $340,000 2.72% Riverside (City) $191,000 $190,000 -0.52% Temecula $275,000 $273,000 -0.73% Riverside Comity $200,000 $195,000 -2.50% Source: DataQuick Information Systems, DQ News Rental Housing According to the 2010 Census, 34 percent of Lake Elsinore households live in rental housing. Table 19 shows that the HUD -determined fair market rents for Riverside County fall within the range of the rents within Lake Elsinore. Therefore, the rental rates in Lake Elsinore generally align with the HUD determined fair market rents. Table 19 Riverside County Fair Market Rents and Lake Elsinore Rental Ranges Efficiency One- Bedroom Two- Bedroom Three- Bedroom Four - Bedroom Fair Market $886 $974 $1,149 $1,617 $1,886 Lake Elsinore Range $500-$600 $559-$1,070 $618-$1,350 $677-$1,799 $1,34142,000 Lake Elsinore Median $550 $1,005 $1,125 $1,410 $,1800 Source: I -IUD User 2012, Craigslist search performed 2012 Overpayment State and federal standards specify that households spending more than 30 percent of gross annual income on housing experience a housing cost burden. Housing cost burdens occur when CITY OF LAKE ELS INOPE GENE RAL PLAN 31 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE , LSINOR_E DREAM EXI'REME housing costs increase faster than household income. When a household spends more than 30 percent of its income on housing costs, it has less disposable income for other necessities such as health care. In the event of unexpected circumstances such as loss of employment or health problems, lower-income households with a housing cost burden are more likely to become homeless or double up with other households. Table 20 shows the connection between income, household type, and cost burden. CHAS data, developed by the Census for HUD, provides detailed information on housing needs (e.g. housing cost burden) by income level for different types of households in Lake Elsinore. The CHAS defines housing problems to include: • Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom) • Overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person per room) • Housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30 percent of gross income • Severe cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50 percent of gross income The proportion of households experiencing cost burden declined as income increased. Households experiencing overpayment (greater than 30 percent of the household's income spent on housing) or severe overpayment (greater than 50 percent of the household's income spent on housing) were split between renters and owners. However, renters were overwhelmingly experiencing overpayment and severe overpayment in the lowest income category (extremely low income). People in this income level who are renting are in the most danger of becoming homeless as they do not have the advantage of the asset of owning a home. CITY OF LAKE ELS I NORE GENERAL PLAN 32 Chapter 6 CITY OF �� LADE LSINOIZE DREAM Table 20 Housing Assistance Needs of Low -Income Households Note: Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data. The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households. Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers. Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Databook, 2012 (Census 2005-2009 data). CITY OF LAKE ELS L NORE GENERAL PLAIN 33 Renters Owners Household by Type, Income and Large Total Large Total Total Housing Problem Elderly Families Renters Elderly Families Owners Households Extremely Low -Income (<30% AMI) 70 165 805 320 35 695 1,500 % with housing 86% 94% 88% 78%° 57 /° 83% 85% problems % Cost Burden >30% 86% 82% 86% 75% 57% 78% 82% % Cost Burden >50% 43% 70% 79% 69% 0% 72% 76% Very Low -Income (>30 to 50% AMI) 130 110 720 275 190 670 1,390 % with housing 65% 100% 91%° 60 /° 76% 85% 88% problems % Cost Burden >30% 62% 86% 88% 60% 76% 85% 87% • Cost Burden >50% 35% 68% 49% 29% 71% 62% 55% Low -Income (>50 to 80% AMI) 55 155 1,035 355 335 1,310 2,345 % with housing 82% ° 81 /° ° 74 /° ° 38 /° ° 88 /° ° 67 /° ° 70 /° problems %Cost Burden>30% 82% 81% 68% 38% 67/° 61% 64% • Cost Burden >50% 82% 10% 17% 11% 37% 37% 28% Total Households 315 715 4,105 1,530 1,855 9,350 13,455 with housing 60% 78% 63%° 46 /° 70% 59% 60% problems • Cost Burden >30% 59% 60% 57% 46% 63% 56% 56% % Cost Burden >50% 38% 29% 29% 28% 27% 26% 27% Note: Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data. The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households. Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers. Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Databook, 2012 (Census 2005-2009 data). CITY OF LAKE ELS L NORE GENERAL PLAIN 33 Chapter 6 Affordability CITY OF LADE OLSIIYOIZE ' ` DREA Affordability is determined by comparing the cost of housing to the income of local households. High housing costs impact communities far beyond the affordability problem. The lack of affordable housing contributes to high levels of housing cost burden, overcrowding, and even homelessness. In assessing housing affordability, the California Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5 provides the following definition of affordable housing cost based on the area median income level (AMI) adjusted by family size and income level: Table 21 Calculation of Affordable Housing Cost Owner Rental Extremely Low (0-30% AMI) 30% of 30% AMI 30% of 30% AMI Very Low (0-50% AMI) 30% of 50% AMI 30% of 50% AMI Lower (>50-80% AMI) 30% of 70% AMI 30% of 60% AMI Moderate Income (>80-120% AMI) 35% of 110% AMI 30% of 110% AMI Affordable housing cost for certain income groups may be subject to an optional calculation and adjustment under Section 50052.5. Using these updated affordability thresholds, current housing affordability at the County level can be estimated for the various income groups (Table 22). CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE 34 GENE [SAL PLAN c3 CITY OF � Chapter 6 LAKE L2LSIl`IOIZE VDREAM Table 22 Housing Affordability Affordable Maximum AMI Payment Housing Costs Affordable Price adjusted Taxes & Income Group by size Renter Owner Utilities Insurance Home Rental Extremely Low (0-30% AMI) One Person $13,650 $341 $341 $50 $80 $46,325 $291 Small Family $15,600 $390 $390 $100 $90 $43,858 $290 Four Person Family $17,550 $439 $439 $125 $95 $47,970 $314 Large Family $19,500 $488 $488 $150 $100 $52,081 $338 Very Low (>30-50% AMI) One Person $22,750 $569 $569 $85 $115 $80,863 $484 Small Family $26,000 $650 $650 $125 $130 $86,620 $525 Four -Person Family $29,250 $731 $731 $175 $140 $91,280 $556 Large Family $32,500 $813 $813 $200 $145 $102,518 $613 Lower (>50-80% AMI) 60%AMI 70%AMI One Person $27,300 $31,850 $683 $796 $100 $165 $116,498 $583 Small Family $31,200 $36,400 $780 $910 $150 $190 $124,995 $630 Four -Person Family $35,100 $40,950 $878 $1,024 $200 $210 $134,589 $678 Large Family $39,000 $45,500 $975 $1,138 $250 $220 $146,376 $725 Moderate 110% (>80-120% AMI) AMI One Person $50,050 $1,251 $1,460 $100 $215 $251,042 $1,151 Small Family $57,200 $1,430 $1,668 $150 $260 $275,940 $1,280 Four -Person Family $64,350 $1,609 $1,877 $200 $280 $306,321 $1,409 Large Family $71,500 $1,788 $2,085 $250 $300 $336,702 $1,538 Source: 2013 Department of Housing and Community Development State Income Limits and Hogle-Ireland analysis 1. Small Family = 3 persons; Large Families =5 persons 2. Property taxes and insurance based on averages for the region 3. Calculation of affordable home sales prices based on a down payment of 10%, annual interest rate of 6.5%,30 -year mortgage, and monthly payment 30% of gross household income 4. Based on Riverside County AMI $65,000 and 2013 I -ICD State Income Limits 5. Monthly affordable rent based on payments of no more than 30% of household income 6. Definition of affordable housing cost per Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN c3 Chapter 6 CITY OF nt LADE ', LSiNORE —�`_V—en� DRM E?(TREMn Comparing housing costs and maximum affordable prices for low-income households shows that low-income households are being priced out of the Riverside County and Lake Elsinore rental and ownership market. Given the affordable home prices presented in Table 22, single- family home ownership is beyond the reach of most lower-income households; however, moderate -income families could afford a median priced home in Lake Elsinore. Assisted Housing at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate Housing State housing law requires an inventory and analysis of government -assisted dwelling units eligible for conversion from lower income housing to market rate housing during the next ten years. Reasons for this conversion may include expiration of subsidies, mortgage pre -payments or pay-offs, and concurrent expiration of affordability restrictions. The majority of subsidized properties listed in Table 23 are owned by for-profit companies, increasing the eventual risk of conversion to market rate. At -Risk Units A review of the assisted housing inventory indicates that no assisted multi -family complexes are subject to expiration of affordability restrictions between 2014-2024. However, the Lakeside Apartments are subject to affordability restrictions that expire October 31, 2029. In 2010, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore provided assistance to the Lakeview Apartments (Phase I and II) to rehabilitate the at -risk units within the project and impose long- term affordable restrictions on 150 units. The affordable housing income restrictions will be in place for a minimum of 55 years. The Parkside Apartments were financed with HUD Section 515 funding; the owners have not as of 2012 indicated their intention to prepay the Section 515 loan. Twenty-two tenants are currently having their rent subsidized by a California program called the Rental Housing Construction Program (RHCP), enabling seniors and disabled residents to pay $100-$300 of the base rent of $665. Effective January 1, 2014, HCD has indicated that this funding will no longer be available; however, the Section 515 rental restrictions will remain in place. According to the HUD Section 8 database, no projects in Lake Elsinore are receiving project -based Section 8 funding. Preservation of at -risk projects can be achieved in a variety of ways, with adequate funding availability. These include: • Transfer of ownership to nonprofit developers and housing organizations • Providing rental assistance to renters through other funding sources • Purchase affordability covenants • Refinance mortgage revenue bonds CITY OF LAKE E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 36 Chapter 6 Table 23 Subsidized Dwelling Units LADE wLSINORE Broadway Machado Apartments Family 28 14 Housing Authority N/A of Riverside County 16436 Broadway Street Fairview Apartments Housing Authority Family 16 16 N/A 33051 Fairview Street of Riverside County Broadstone Rivers Edge Lake Elsinore Apartments Family 184 # of 2088 Lakeshore Drive Earliest Lake Elsinore Total Affordable 295 West Summer Avenue Conversion Project Name Tenant Type Units Units Funding Program Date Parkside Apartments Senior/ 14CD Financed 442 Kellogg Street Handicapped/ 37 14 N/A (Limited Profit) Disabled Section 515 Villa Siena Apartments Low Income 31300 Casino Drive Family 126 126 Housing Tax Credit 2054 Lake View Apartments (Phase I) Lake Elsinore Family 88 87 Redevelopment 10/12/2065 32209 Riverside Drive Agency (Limited Profit) Lake View Apartments (Phase II) Lake Elsinore Family 64 63 Redevelopment 10/12/2065 32211 Riverside Drive Agency (Limited Profit) Lakeside Apartments Lake Elsinore Family 128 52 Redevelopment 2029 15195 Lincoln Street Agency Restrictions Broadway Machado Apartments Family 28 14 Housing Authority N/A of Riverside County 16436 Broadway Street Fairview Apartments Housing Authority Family 16 16 N/A 33051 Fairview Street of Riverside County Broadstone Rivers Edge Lake Elsinore Apartments Family 184 28 Redevelopment 2060 2088 Lakeshore Drive Agency Restrictions Lake Elsinore Pottery Court Family 113 111 Redevelopment 2066 295 West Summer Avenue Agency Restrictions Sources: I -IIID Section 8 Database, Special Report: Low Income Housing Tax Credit Properties in California (www nhtinc.ore); Riverside County Housing Authority (mLiAy arivconre); Lake Elsinore 1998-2005 Housing Element C I T Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 37 Chapter 6 CITY OF LADE OLSINORE DREAM Alternatively, units that are converted to market rate may be replaced with new assisted multi- family units with specified affordability timeframes. Transferring ownership of the affordable units to a nonprofit housing organization is a viable way to preserve affordable housing for the long term and increases the number of government resources available to the project. The feasibility of this option depends on the willingness of the owner to sell, funding sources to actually buy the property, and the existence of a nonprofit organization with sufficient administrative capacity to manage the property. If and when owners indicate their intention to sell, the City can explore transfer of ownership options with potential agencies or organizations included in the State's Department of Housing and Community Development qualified entities list. Projects in which all units are affordable, and not just a portion of units are affordable, can participate in ownership transfers more simply and are therefore more likely to be feasible. State, local, or other funding sources can be used to provide rental subsidies to maintain the affordability of at -risk projects. These subsidies can be structured to mirror the Section 8 program, whereby the subsidy covers the cost of the unit above what is determined to be affordable for the tenant's household income (including a utility allowance) up to the fair market value of the apartment. Funding for this assistance may be difficult to secure, however. Another option to preserve the affordability of at -risk projects is to provide an incentive package to the owners to maintain the projects as low-income housing. Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan balance. The feasibility of this option depends on whether the complexes require rehabilitation or are too highly leveraged. By providing lump -sum financial incentives or on-going subsidies in rents or reduced mortgage interest rates to the owner, some or all of the units could remain affordable. However, given the limited funding available to jurisdictions for such efforts and especially given the demise of redevelopment in California, these options are unlikely to come to fruition. The construction of new low-income housing can be a means to replace at -risk units. The cost of developing new housing depends on a variety of factors including density, size of units, construction quality and type, location, and land cost. The average development cost for a multi -family rental unit, can be estimated at $200,000. Estimates of Housing Need Several factors influence the degree of demand, or "need," for housing in Lake Elsinore. The four major needs categories considered in this element are: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE [1 GENE RAI. PLAN Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE LSIlYORE -� DREAM • Housing needs resulting from population growth, both in the City and the surrounding region; • Housing needs resulting from the overcrowding of units; • Housing needs that result when households pay more than they can afford for housing; and • Housing needs of "special needs groups' such as the elderly, large families, female - headed households, households with a disabled person, farmworkers, and the homeless. Table 25 Summary of Existing Housing Need Overpaying Households' Special Needs Groups Renter 2,325 Elderly Persons 2,965 Owner 7,580 Disabled Persons 3,327 Total 9,905 Large Households 3,825 Extremely Low -Income (0-30% AMI) 1,500 Female Headed Households 2,140 Female Headed Households with Very Low -Income (31-50% AMI) 1,390 1,343 Children Low -Income (51-80% AMI) 2,345 Farmworkers 193 Overcrowded Householdsz Homeless 113 Renter 557 Owner 294 Total 851 Source: 2010 Census, 2012 CHAS 1. Overpaying households are all households with 30% or greater household income dedicated to house payments 2. Overcrowded households are based upon greater than 1 person per room Projected Housing Need California General Plan law requires each city and county to have land zoned to accommodate its fair share of the regional housing need. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), in conjunction with the SCAG, determine a projected housing need for the region covered by SCAG, including the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura and Imperial. This share, known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), is 412,721 new housing units for the 2014-2021 planning CITY OF LAKE E LSI MORE GENERAL, PLAN W Chapter 6 CITY OF "WNI LAKE LSIBOKE DREAM F.1CIREME period throughout the SCAG region. SCAG has, in turn, allocated this share among its constituent jurisdictions, distributing to each its own RHNA divided along income levels. The City of Lake Elsinore has a RHNA of 4,929 housing units to accommodate in the housing element period. The income distribution is as shown in Table 26. Table 26 Regional Housing Needs Allocation 2014-2021 Number of Units Percent of Total Income Group % of County AMI Allocated Allocation Very Low, 0-50% 1,196 24% Low >50-80% 801 16% Moderate >80-120% 897 18% Above Moderate 120%+ 2,035 41% Total --- 4,929 100% 'State law allows local jurisdictions to use 50 percent of the very low income category to represent households of extremely low- income (less than 30 percent of the AMI). Extremely Low Income Households According to Housing Element Law, Government Code Section 65583, local agencies may calculate the subset of very low-income households that qualify as extremely low-income households (30 percent or less of the Riverside County median income) by presuming that 50 percent of the very low-income households qualify as extremely low-income households. The 2014 SCAG RHNA projected 1,196 very low-income households in the upcoming planning period. Therefore, 598 extremely low-income households are projected in Lake Elsinore between 2014 and 2021. This Housing Element will describe policies and programs that the City can utilize towards implementing this housing needs allocation. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 40 CITY Or ,�`C� Chapter 6 LAKE "LSINORE � `n DREAM Constraints6.3 Housing The City of Lake Elsinore recognizes the need for the development of sound, affordable housing for all its residents. The key factors constraining housing development include land availability, the economics of development, and governmental regulations, all of which may impact the cost and amount of housing produced. These constraints may result in housing that is not affordable to low- and moderate -income households, or may make new residential construction economically difficult for developers. Constraints to housing production significantly impact households with lower incomes and special needs. State law requires that Housing Elements analyze potential and actual governmental and non-governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing for all persons of all income levels and disabilities. In Lake Elsinore, constraints to housing are often related to the overall housing market and are part of regional trends over which the City has no control. This section discusses potential constraints on the provision and cost of housing development in Lake Elsinore. According to State Housing Element Law, the constraints analysis must demonstrate local efforts to remove barriers to achieving goals for housing production and housing for persons with disabilities. Should constraints preclude the achievement of housing goals, jurisdictions are required to address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. Where constraints to housing production related to the City's regulations or land use controls are identified, appropriate programs to mitigate these constraints are included in the Housing Plan. Market Constraints Many factors affecting housing costs are related to the larger housing market. The availability of land, the cost and availability of financing the price of land, and the cost of construction all contribute to the cost of housing, and can hinder the production of affordable housing. Additionally, the availability of financing can limit access to homeownership for some low- income households. DEVELOPMENT COSTS A significant cost factor associated with residential building is the cost of building materials, which can comprise a significant portion of the sales price of a home. An indicator of construction costs is Building Valuation Data compiled by the International Code Council (ICC). C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 41 Chapter 6 CITY OF i.�n LADE LSIl`iOIZE —� DREAM The unit costs compiled by the ICC include structural, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical work, in addition to interior finish and normal site preparation. The data is national and does not take into account regional differences, nor does the data include the price of the land upon which the buildings are built. The 2012 national averages for costs per square foot of apartment units and single-family homes are as follows: • Type I or II, Multi -Family: $144.89 to $127.29 per sq. ft. • Type V (Wood Frame), Multi -Family: $101.08 to $96.58 per sq. ft. • Type V (Wood Frame), One and Two Family Dwelling: $113.10to $1.05.93 per sq. ft. The unit costs for residential care facilities generally range between $171 and $122 per square foot. These costs are exclusive of the costs of land and soft costs, such as entitlements, financing, etc. The City's ability to mitigate high construction costs is limited without direct subsidies. A reduction in amenities and quality of building materials (above a minimum level of acceptability for health, safety, and adequate performance) could result in lower sales prices. Additionally, manufactured housing (including both mobile homes and modular housing) may provide for lower priced housing by reducing construction and labor costs. Another factor related to construction cost is development density. With an increase in the number of units built in a project, overall costs generally decrease as builders can benefit from the economies of scale. This reduction in costs is of particular benefit when density bonuses are utilized for the provision of affordable housing. The price of land can be the most significant component of housing development costs. Land costs may vary depending on whether the site is vacant or has an existing use that must be removed. Similarly, site constraints such as environmental issues (steep slopes, soil stability, seismic hazards, or flooding) can also be factored into the cost of land. The cost of land in Lake Elsinore and surrounding cities has risen substantially since the 1990s due to a decrease in the availability of vacant or otherwise developable land in the Inland Empire region; however the recent downturn in the housing market has reduced land and housing prices significantly since 2007. The high cost of land is a contributing factor to the lack of affordable housing in all of Southern California. LAND AVAILABILITY The cost of land directly influences the cost of housing. In turn, land prices are determined by a number of factors, most important of which are land availability and permitted development density. As land becomes scarcer, the price for land increases. In terms of development density, land prices are positively correlated with the number of units permitted on each lot. Thus, a CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 42 Chapter 6 CITY OF �r^n LAKE bLSIlY01ZE 10V DREAM higher density lot may command a higher price than one designated for lower densities, but upon completion the developer may realize a higher profit margin based on a greater number of units sold. Over the past few decades, vacant residential land sales have increased due to the highly active Southern California housing market. Even in this market environment, there are significant differences in land prices in the region. In general, land prices in Riverside County are more affordable than the pricier Los Angeles and Orange County markets; in fact, the lack of inexpensive residential land in Los Angeles and Orange Counties was a major impetus for the development of the Inland Empire, including Lake Elsinore and western Riverside County. Accordingly, Lake Elsinore, along with other cities within Riverside County, is providing affordable housing for workers in Orange County and Los Angeles County. Within the Riverside County market, there are also significant differences in land prices. New master -planned communities in Temecula, Corona, and parts of the Coachella Valley have generally garnered higher residential land prices than more established communities in central, southern and parts of eastern Riverside County. Although they remain a significant cost component of a new home, land prices in Lake Elsinore do not significantly constrain the production of housing, relative to surrounding jurisdictions. In fact, the land costs in Lake Elsinore are more conducive to construction than other areas of Riverside County, and have contributed to the potential for single-family market rate units to be constructed which are generally affordable to moderate, and in some cases, lower income households. LABOR COST The California Labor Code applies prevailing wage rates to public works projects exceeding $1,000 in value. Public works projects include construction, alteration, installation, demolition, or repair work performed under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. While the cost differential in prevailing and standard wages varies based on the skill level of the occupation, prevailing wages tend to add to the overall cost of development. In the case of affordable housing projects, prevailing wage requirements could effectively reduce the number of affordable units that can be achieved with public subsidies. AVAILABILITY OF MORTGAGE AND REHABILITATION FINANCING The availability of financing affects a persons ability to purchase or improve a home; the cost of borrowing money for residential development is incorporated directly into the sales price or CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 43 Chapter 6 CITY Or LADE &LSINOIZE VDREAM rent. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic conditions, and there is virtually nothing a local government can do to affect these rates. Jurisdictions can, however, offer interest rate write-downs to extend home purchasing opportunities to a broader economic segment of the population. In addition, government -insured loan programs are an option available to some households to reduce mortgage requirements. As of 2012, interest rates remained at historic lows, facilitating resurgence in the housing market. Under the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (NMDA), lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications and the income, gender, and race of loan applicants. The availability of financing for a home greatly affects a person's ability to purchase a home or invest in repairs and improvements. As shown in Table 27, a total of nearly 29,400 households applied for conventional mortgage loans to purchase homes in the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario MSA during 2011, of which Lake Elsinore is a part. The data includes purchases of one- to four -unit homes, as well as manufactured homes. More than half of the loan applications were received from households that reported their income as above moderate -income (earning greater than 120 percent of Median Family Income [MFI]). Moderate -income households (80 to 120 percent of MFI) and lower-income households (less than 80 percent MFI) accounted for 21 percent and 24 percent, respectively. Sixty-five percent of the applications were originated (approved by lenders and accepted by applicants) and 15 percent were denied, with the remaining applications withdrawn, closed for incompleteness, or not accepted by the applicants. As expected, the denial rates were lower for the moderate- and upper-income groups. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 44 GENERAL PLAN CITY or Chapter 6 LAKE C?pLSITYORE -' DREA Table 27 Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario MSA Total % of Origin Denie Applicant Income Apps. Total ated d Lower- Income (<80% MFI) 7,118 24% 59% 18% Moderate -Income (80 to 120% MFI) 6,291 21% Upper -Income (>120% MFI) All 15,351 52% 64% 15% 68% 12% 29,379 100%** 65% 15% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), 2011. * "Other includes applications approved but not accepted, withdrawn, and files closed for incompleteness. *"Totals do not sum to equal "all" due to the unavailability of income data for some applicants. Government -backed lending represents a significant alternate financing option for Lake Elsinore residents. About 36,000 Riverside/San Bernardino -area households applied for govemment-backed lending in 2011 (Table 28). Usually, low-income households have a much better chance of getting a government -assisted loan than a conventional loan. The number of government backed loans has increased significantly from the height of the housing boom; in 2011, the number of applications for governmental -assisted loans exceeded that for conventional loans by 23 percent. No longer available are other loan options such as zero percent down, interest -only, and adjustable loans. As a result, government -backed loans have become a very attractive option for many households. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 45 GENE RAI. PLAN Chapter 6 Table 28 CITY OF LADE LSII`IOU DREAM Disposition of Government -Assisted Home Purchase Loan Applications for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario MSA U�U Total % of Originate Applicant Income Apps. Total d % Denied Lower -Income (<80% MFI) Moderate -Income (80 to 120% MFI) Upper -Income (>120% MFI) All 14,585 40% 65% 14% 10,781 30% 70% 13% 10,354 29% 70% 12% 36,060- * 100%** 68% 13% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (NMDA), 2011. * "Other" includes applications approved but not accepted, withdrawn, and files closed for incompleteness. *"Totals do not sum to equal "all" due to the unavailability of income data for some applicants. According to Dataquick, the number of California homes entering the formal foreclosure process dropped in the second quarter of 2012 to its lowest level since early 2007. The decline stems from a combination of factors, including an improving housing market, the gradual burning off of the most egregious mortgages originated from 2005 through 2007, and the growing use of short sales over foreclosures. Most of the loans going into default are still from the 2005-2007 period. The median origination quarter for defaulted loans is still third-quarter 2006, indicating that weak underwriting standards peaked then. In the second quarter of 2012, 5,677 homes in Riverside County were foreclosed, a 3 percent increase from the same quarter of 2011, according to reports by Dataquick, an information database that tracks housing cost and issues. Among Southern California counties, Riverside County is second to Los Angeles County (10,568 foreclosures) in the number of foreclosed homes. Governmental Constraints Housing affordability can be affected by factors in both the private and public sectors. Actions by the City can have an impact on the price and availability of housing. Public policies can affect overall housing availability, adequacy, and affordability. Land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other local programs intended to improve the quality of housing may serve as a constraint to housing development. Consistent with State law (Government Code Section 65583) this section addresses six potential constraints to housing development: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 46 G E N E RA L P L A N Chapter 6 • Land use controls • Building codes and their enforcement • Site improvements (on and off-site) • Fees and exactions • Processing and permit procedures • Housing for people with disabilities LAND USE CONTROLS CITY OF LAKE �LSI1.10R_E 'M' ` Dkrq Development and growth in Lake Elsinore are issues of critical importance to City government and residents. Land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other local programs to improve the overall quality of housing may serve as a constraint to housing development. Land use controls set forth by the General Plan and Municipal Code Chapter 17 (Zoning) could have direct effects on the availability and affordability of housing in the City. Controls currently in place in Lake Elsinore are described below. GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY FORM ELEMENT In December 2011, the Lake Elsinore City Council adopted a new General Plan. The Community Form Element sets forth the City's policies for guiding local development and growth. These policies, together with zoning regulations, establish the density, intensity and distribution of land uses within the City. The Element includes new mixed-use development categories that promote development of mixed commercial, office, and residential uses with densities ranging from 7 units per acre up to 24 units per acre (higher densities are achievable with a density bonus incentive). In early 2012, the City Council completed comprehensive Zoning Map amendments, to adopt the newly added mixed use Zoning Districts and to rezone High Density Residential parcels to the R-3 zone, consistent with the General Plan Land Use map. CITY OF LAKE E LSI N O R E GENERAL PLAN 47 Chapter 6 Table 29 Residential Land Use Designations CITY OF r wll LADE �LSIN0P-,E -4 , DREAM Corresponding General Plan Residential Zone Maximum Land Use Category Districts Densities Typical Residential Types 1 DU/half/acre Hillside Residential R -M -R to 10 acres Detached single-family dwellings & small depending on agricultural uses slope Lakeside Residential R-1 1 DU/ 10,000 Custom single family homes focusing on s.f. lake views Low Density Residential R -M -R, R -R, R -E, 1-3 DU/acre Detached single-family dwellings, R -H secondary residential units Low -Medium Density R-H 1-6 DU/acre Detached single-family dwellings, secondary secondary residential units Attached and detached single-family Medium Density R -H, R-1,R-2,MC 7-18 DU/acre dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, Residential multi -family residential units, group quarters High Density Residential R -1,R -2,R-3, MC 19-24 DU/acre Attached single-family dwellings, multi- family residential units, group quarters Commercial Mixed Use CMU 7-18 DU/acre Residential uses are allowed in a subordinate capacity. Apartments, condos, duplexes, triplexes, Residential Mixed Use RMU 19-24 DU/acre fourplexes, townhouses, boarding houses, row houses Note 1: The General Plan and Comprehensive Zoning Regulations allow for higher densities based on the type of development proposed. See discussion below. Source: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Appendix B General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix, 2011, City of Lake Elsinore, 2012; City of Lake Elsinore, 2012 Residential land use designations are dispersed throughout the City. Densities range from one to three units per acre for Low Density areas and up to 24 units per acre in the Residential Mixed Use and High Density Residential areas. With the inclusion of Density Bonus Incentives, these High Density Residential areas can accommodate an additional 35 percent density increase. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN Fri Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE C_?qLSIIYOKE DREA The Land Use Element designates approximately 61 percent of the City and its Sphere of Influence's land for residential use. In addition, 286 acres are designated Residential Mixed -Use (RMU), which allows residential uses to be integrated with commercial uses. A total of 631 acres are designated Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) within the City, which allows both commercial and residential uses. Residential and Commercial Mixed Use designations are intended for more urban areas within the City. The Residential Mixed Use designation focuses on higher density residential uses with additional commercial uses, while the Commercial Mixed Use designation focuses on Commercial development with some high density residential development. The higher densities allowed in the High Density and Residential Mixed Use designations create opportunities for providing affordable housing. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The City regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development primarily through the Title 17 — Zoning of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Zoning regulations are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents, as well as implement the policies of the City's General Plan. The zoning regulations also serve to preserve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. The following table is based on the zoning designations found in the current Zoning Code (2012). CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 49 Chapter 6 CITY Or LADE CpLSIf1C) E --Nt'10 DREAM and similar to lesser open space requirements provides greater flexibility within the City of Lake Elsinore to provide affordable housing. Parking City parking standards for residential developments are tailored to the vehicle ownership patterns associated with different residential uses. The Code requires parking based on the number of units on the property. Parking requirements for residential uses are listed in Table 31. For single-family developments, LEMC Title 17 requires two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and two additional open spaces on the driveway. Multi -family residential requirements vary based on the number of bedrooms in each unit, and require guest parking. Table 31 Parking Requirements Type of Dwelling Single -Family Dwelling Multiple -Family Dwelling Units Studio and One -bedroom unit Two or more bedroom unit Boarding houses Convalescent, nursing and/or rest homes Parking Requirements 2 covered parking spaces per DU plus 2 open spaces in a driveway 1 covered and 2/3 uncovered parking spaces per DU 1 covered and 1. 1/3 uncovered parking spaces per DU 1 space per resident 1 open parking space for each 3 beds Source: City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Regulations, 2012 Section 17.148.030- Number of parking spaces permitted. Parking requirements for the residential component of mixed-use developments are determined by the uses in Table 31 above, however, a request to reduce the number of required parking spaces may be made to the Planning Commission provided a Parking Study supports the finding that the number of parking spaces actually needed for a specific project is less than that required by Code. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 54 GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE ULSINORE DREAM Parking standards require fewer parking stalls for smaller units such as studios and one - bedroom units. In addition, LEMC Section 17.58.045- Density Bonuses, Additional Incentives, permits the City to reduce the required number of vehicular spaces that would otherwise be required. LEMC Section 17.58.050- Density Bonus Agreement Requirements, is consistent with the parking requirements of California Government Code Section 65915(p). These two sections permit the City to reduce the number of parking stalls required to allow for higher density development of a project. Lake Elsinore's parking standards are comparable to those found in surrounding communities, including Murrieta and Temecula. Density Bonus regulations, consistent with State law, also allow for additional creativity and flexibility in development. The parking requirements are not viewed as constraints to development as efficient site planning can maximize density while providing needed parking for residents. To assess potential constraints, a review of recently approved large-scale projects was completed to determine if maximum densities are achievable. This review revealed that at least three recently approved projects in Lake Elsinore were able to achieve maximum densities while complying with all development standards, indicating that there are limited constraints to housing development. The Fairfield Apartments, 20.44 du/ac, located in northeastern Lake Elsinore and River's Edge Apartments, 26 du/ac, located east of downtown near the Lake Elsinore Diamond were approved in 2004-2005, and are now constructed and occupied. The Pottery Court Apartments project, a very low income multi -family development, was approved in 2008 at 26 dwelling units per acre; this development was opened in 2012. All of these projects include three-story structures, which maximizes the height limit and none of the projects filed for a Variance to adjust the parking requirement. Specific Plan District The Specific Plan District (SPD) is intended to allow greater design flexibility and to encourage well-planned developments. A specific plan document, site plan, tentative tract map, and final tract map are required to develop a specific plan development. The SPD permits the combination of several land uses. Mixed uses may include any combination of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, and agricultural uses. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 55 G E N E R A L P 1, A N Chapter 6 Mixed-use Development Standards Ctry OF A LADE f_:�_19'2LSIlYOIZE DREAM The City's overriding constraint with regard to residential development is the relatively low density within the single-family residential zoning designations. With the expansion of the High Density Residential designation in certain areas and the introduction of two mixed-use designations into the General Plan, the City has provided expanded opportunities for different types of housing and increased densities (up to 24 units per acre). In 2012, the City adopted corresponding mixed use zoning districts and development standards to implement General Plan policy. Table 32 Mixed Use Development Standards Standards CMU RMU FAR 0.8:1 1.0:1 19-24 du/ac Density 7-18 du/ac (Up to 35 du/ac with Density Bonus) Lot Size No Minimum No Minimum 10 ft 10 If Minimum Front Setbacks St. Front loft 10 It Interior None None Source: City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Code, 2012. The intent of the RMU District is to provide a development opportunity to combine both residential and neighborhood retail and service uses, preferably incorporated into a mixed-use project. The RMU District accommodates primarily medium to high density residential mixed-use developments, with limited commercial, institutional, office and service uses distributed in a manner compatible with the street environment and adjacent to residential areas. The intent of the CMU District is to accommodate a development opportunity that offers a mix of land uses in a compact, high quality, pedestrian -friendly, interactive pattern. Commercial mixed-use districts are characterized by interconnected streets, wide sidewalks, outdoor public spaces and activities. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 56 Chapter 6 PROVIDING FOR A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES C1TY OF LAKE Cq?LSIlYOKE I= D[iEA The Community Form Element and LEMC Title 17 contain the basic standards that allow for the development of a variety of housing types. Title 17 development standards are considered standard for suburban communities in Riverside County and Southern California and do not impede the ability to develop housing at appropriate densities. Table 33 lists the allowed location of specific uses. A matrix showing the allowable housing types in each residential zone will be incorporated into the comprehensively updated Title 17. Table 33 Permitted Uses in Residential Zones Uses R -M -R R -R R -E R -H R-1 R-2 R-3 One Family Homes P P P P P P* P* Two -Family Homes P Multi -Family Housing P P Day Care P* P* P* P* P* P* P* Home Occupations A* A* A* A* A* A* A* Large Family Day Care C* C* C* C* C* C* C* Mobile Home on Permanent P* P* P* P* P* Foundation Residential Care P* P* P* P* P* P* P* Rest Homes C C Second units P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P = Automatically permitted use A = Accessory Use. Use permitted only if accessory to another primary use on the same site C = Conditional Use. Use eligible for consideration under the conditional use procedures and permitted only if the conditional use permit is approved, subject to the specific conditions of such permit. = Use shall be subject to special conditions or specific restrictions as listed in this section. - = Not a permitted use. Source: Lake Elsinore Zoning Code, 2012 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENE RAL PLAN 57 Chapter 6 Multi -Family Housing CITY OF LADE LSIRORE _ DREAM Multi -family housing is permitted by right in the R-2, R-3, CMU, and RMU zones. Multi- family developments in residential zones are subject to regulations related to the distance between buildings, as this distance is not permitted to be less than 15 feet. Additional privacy standards related to the placement of windows are also required in all multi -family housing projects. Second Units As indicated in Table 35, Lake Elsinore permits the creation of second units on all residential sites containing an existing single-family home as consistent with State law. Conditions of approval for second units are standard and do not impede the creation of second units. These conditions include: • A maximum of one second unit on each lot. • The gross floor area for the accessory dwelling unit must not exceed 30 percent of the existing residence for attached units and 50 percent of the existing residence for detached units. A maximum square footage of 1,000 is permitted for attached units and detached units shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. • The second unit shall contain no more than 2 bedrooms. • The second unit must be compatible with the existing primary residence in terms of form, material, and architectural design. • Second units must include one off-street parking space in a garage. This space shall not be located within the required setbacks or through tandem parking. • There shall not be more than one exterior entrance on the front or on any street side of the second unit and no exterior stairway shall be located on the front of the building. • The main dwelling unit shall continue to comply with the minimum standards applicable to a single-family detached dwelling unit in the zoning district even with the development of a second unit. Senior Citizen Housing The City of Lake Elsinore does not have any specific regulations for the development of senior citizen housing. At this time, senior citizen housing is subject to the same regulations and process as any residential development; however senior housing may seek density bonus incentives, consistent with State law. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE GENERAL PLAN N Chapter 6 Community Care Facilities CITY OF LAKE CpLSIN0RE DREAM LEMC Title 17 defines residential or community care facilities as providing for the care of children and mentally and physically handicapped persons in a residential environment. Consistent with State law, the City facilitates the development of residential care facilities by treating licensed facilities that serve six or fewer persons as standard residential uses. Those facilities that serve more than 6 persons are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit in all residential zones. Emergency and Transitional Housing Emergency housing provides short-term shelter (usually for up to six months of stay) for homeless persons or persons facing other difficulties, such as domestic violence. Transitional housing provides longer-term housing (up to two years), coupled with supportive services such as job training and counseling, to individuals and families who are transitioning to permanent housing. To facilitate the development of emergency housing and comply with State law, the City amended the Zoning Code in 2012 to address emergency shelters and transitional and supportive housing. Consistent with State law, transitional housing is permitted in the R-3, RMU, and CMU zones. Emergency homeless shelters are designated as a permitted use in the C -M (Commercial Manufacturing) and M-2 (General Manufacturing) zones. The ordinance includes emergency shelter development standards and operational regulations consistent with state law. The LEMC has been modified to include the following codes related to Emergency and Transitional housing: Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 17.08.50 E definitions. "Emergency shelter" Immediate and short-term housing with supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay. 17.08.190 S definitions. "Supportive housing" Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 691 Chapter 6 CITY OF LADE C?LSINORE DaEA� M EXTREME resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. 17.08.200 T definitions. "Transitional housing" Buildings configured as rental apartment developments, that operate under program requirements which call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months, and no more than two years. Appropriate sites for the transitional housing development should include those close to public services and facilities including transportation. Chapter 17.84 R-3 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 17.84.020 Permitted Uses. L. Supportive housing. M. Transitional housing. Chapter 17.86 RMU RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT 17.86.020 Permitted Uses. Table of Mixed -Use Land Uses Supportive housing. Transitional housing. Chapter 17.134 CMU COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT 17.134.020 Permitted Uses. Table of Mixed -Use Land Uses Supportive housing. Transitional housing. Chapter 17.132 C -M COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT 17.132.020 Permitted Uses. F. Emergency Shelter, in accordance with Sec. 17.132.150 Emergency Shelter Use & Development Standards CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 60 G E N E RA L P L AN Chapter 6 CITY OF LAK -E DREAM EXI'REME 17.132.150 Emergency Shelter Use & Development Standards In accordance with California Government Code Sec 65582, 65583(x), and 65589.5. emergency shelters are permitted as a matter of right in the CM zone. The purpose of regulating the siting of emergency shelters, their use and development, is to ensure the development of emergency shelters do not adversely impact adjacent parcels or the surrounding neighborhood, and shall be developed in a manner that protects the health, safety, and general welfare of A. Use Standards 1. Number of Beds. An emergency shelter shall contain a maximum of 50 beds. 2. Hours of Operation. Emergency shelter operations are limited to the evening hours and shall open not earlier than 5:00 pm and close not later than 8 a.m. daily. All clientele shall vacate the premises upon closing. There shall be no in -and -out privileges for clientele using the shelter between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. 3. Management. The shelter shall provide onsite management during hours of operation, at a ratio of one staff member for every 15 beds. Staff members shall be awake and on duty during the operating hours of the shelter. 4. Use of the Program. The shelter shall operate on a first come, first served basis. It is preferred that the shelter operate on a voucher system, wherein Intake procedures are performed as a separate function from the shelter and results in a referral to the shelter program for a specified period of time. 5. Objective of the Program. Services shall be provided to assist clients in obtaining permanent shelter, income, and services. 6. Length of Stay. Clients are permitted to return to the shelter for a maximum of 180 days unless their individual management plan provides for longer residency while regularly participating in training or rehabilitation. 7. Reimbursement. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay. 8. Licensing. The facility shall demonstrate that it is in good standing with County, State and City licensing agencies, if required for the owner, operator and staff. 9. Shelter Management Plan. The shelter shall provide a written management plan to the City that includes provisions for staff training and qualifications; neighborhood outreach program including litter CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 61 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE VI -1 LSII`iOIZE DREAD M EXTREME pickup with a 500 foot radius, and traversing the neighborhood daily for input and reconnaissance; transportation options; security; location of smoking area, volunteer and donation program and procedures, intake screening to ensure compatibility with services provided at the facility, and for the training, counseling and treatment programs for clients; and health, safety and emergency plans. B. Development Standards 1. The development standards set forth in the C -M zone shall apply, unless otherwise specified herein. 2. Interior Waiting Area. Interior onsite waiting and client intake area shall be a minimum of 200 square feet, including seating for 25 clients at any one time. 3. Exterior Waiting Area. A covered exterior onsite waiting area shall be provided, at a minimum of 100 square feet for seating for 50 clients at any one time, to protect clients from the elements. 4. Separation between Shelters. An emergency shelter shall be no closer than 300 feet from another emergency shelter, as measured from the nearest property line. 5. External Lighting. Adequate external lighting shall be provided for security purposes. The lighting shall be stationary and directed away from adjacent properties and public -rights-of-way. 6. Parking. Off-street parking requirements shall provide for employees, residents and visitors, including a loading space, as set forth in the facility management plan which shall demonstrate the need for spaces at the facility. 7. ADA Access. The shelter shall be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act. S. Amenities. The facility may include central cooking and dining areas, laundry area, recreation rooms, counseling centers, child care facilities, play areas, bike racks, and other support services for the exclusive use of the residents and staff. Chapter 1.7.140 M-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT 17.140.20 Permitted Uses. L. Emergency Shelter, in accordance with Sec. 17.132.150 Emergency Shelters Use & Development Standards. CITY OF LAKE ELSI NO'RE GENE [SAL PLAN 62 Chapter 6 Supportive Housing CITY OF �. LAKE �LSIN0RE '01 �J DREA " In a supportive housing development, housing can be coupled with social services such as job training, alcohol and drug abuse programs, and case management for populations in need of assistance, such as the homeless, those suffering from mental illness or substance abuse problems, and the elderly or medically frail. The City amended the Zoning Code in 2012 to include supportive housing as permitted by right in the CMU, RMU, and R-3 zones. The LEMC has been modified to include the following codes related to Supportive Housing: Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 17.08.190 S definitions. "Supportive housing" Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Manufactured and Mobile Homes Manufactured housing, including mobile homes on permanent foundations, is permitted by right on all lots which permit single-family houses subject to certain restrictions, pursuant to State law. These restrictions include the following: • The mobile home must be certified pursuant to the National Mobilehome Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974. • The mobile home must be installed on a permanent foundation. • The exterior shall be of a material similar to that utilized in conventionally built single-family dwellings. • The roof shall be of a material similar to that utilized in conventionally built single-family dwellings, have an eave and gable overhang of not less than twelve inches (12") measured from the vertical side of the manufactured home and have a pitch not less than that required for conventionally built single-family homes. • An enclosed garage shall be provided which is similar to that provided for single-family dwellings and the exterior siding and roof materials shall be the same as the manufactured home. C IT Y OF L A K E E L S I N O R E 63 G E N E R A L P L A N Chapter 6 Farmworker Housing CITY OF LADE CpLSINORE DREAM As indicated in the Community Needs Assessment, only 193 Lake Elsinore residents have "Agricultural, Farming, Forestry, Fishing and Mining"" occupations, according to the 2010 Census. City records indicate that there are no agricultural operations in Lake Elsinore. Lake Elsinore is evolving into an urbanized community and does not contain any large-scale commercial agricultural activities. Urbanization has precluded the demand for farmworker housing. However, the City complies with the State Employee Housing Act where it would apply (Section 17000 of the Health and Safety Code). Single -Room Occupancy Facilities Single -room occupancy (SRO) buildings house people in single rooms, with tenants often sharing bathrooms and kitchens. SROs are not specifically identified in Title 17; however, the City will review SRO projects with the same process it uses to review hotel, motel, or multi -family housing, depending on the project composition and zone. The density and services available in the downtown make this an ideal location for permitting SROs. The possible conditional use permit criteria for the review of SROs pertain to performance standards such as hours of operation, security, and parking, etc. SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted a number of specific plans to facilitate a diversity of development types. These include: • La Laguna Estates Specific Plan — 660 dwelling units on 488 acres • Cape of Good Hope Specific Plan — 67 dwelling units on 41. acres • Cottage Lane Specific Plan — 48 dwelling units on 12 acres • Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan —1,035 dwelling units on 259 acres • Lakeshore Village Specific Plan — 410 dwelling units on 37 acres • North Peak Specific Plan —1,200 dwelling units on 1,786 acres • Ramsgate Specific Plan — 2,759 dwelling units on 1,366 acres • Tuscany Hills Specific Plan —1,847 dwelling units on 1,010 acres • Canyon Hills Specific Plan — 3,830 dwelling units on 1,969 acres • Canyon Creek Specific Plan —1,152 dwelling units on 476 acres • Elsinore City Center Specific Plan — 162 dwelling units on 49 acres • East Lake Specific Plan — 7,389 dwelling units on 2,893 acres • Alberhill Ranch Specific Plans— 3,667 dwelling units on 1,901 acres CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN Coll Chapter 6 CITY Of LAIC 9 LSINORE - DREAD M EXTREME • Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan —1,819 dwelling units on 511 acres • Outlet Center Expansion Specific Plan — 47 acres • Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan -146 dwelling units on 20 acres • Canyon Hills Estates Specific Plan— 302 dwelling units on 246 acres • Diamond Specific Plan — 600 dwelling units on 87 acres DENSITY BONUS In May 2008, the City adopted a Residential Density Bonus Ordinance, consistent with California Government Code Section 65915 et seq. (State Density Bonus Law). The Density Bonus Ordinance allows developers of residential projects to apply for up to a 35 percent increase in the maximum residential density allowed by the project site zoning and land use designation, subject to certain qualifications. With adoption of implementing zoning for the Residential Mixed Use General Plan land use designation, a density bonus incentive to achieve up to 35 dwelling units per net acre is permitted when site amenities are provided. Amenities for which a bonus may be granted are defined below: • Exceptional Architecture • Incorporation of Green -Building techniques • Child-care facilities provided on-site • Project site is located within 1,500 feet from a regular bus stop or rapid transit system stop • Project site is located within a quarter mile from a public park or community center • Project site is located within a half mile from school grounds/facilities open to the general public • Project site is located within one mile from a public library • Project site is located within a half mile from a full-scale grocery store • Project site is located within a half mile from a medical clinic or hospital • Project site is located within a quarter mile from a pharmacy • Provision for affordable housing • Aggregate parcels CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 65 GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 CITY OP LAK E �LSIHOU , oDREAM EXTREME Table 34 Density Bonus Opportunities Minimum Additional Bonus % Target Units Percent of Bonus for Each 1% Increase Required For Group Units Granted in Target Units Maximum 35% Bonus Very Low -Income 5% 20% 2.5% 10% Low -Income 10% 20% 1.5% 10% Moderate -Income (Condo or PUD Only) 10% 5% 1% 10% Senior Citizen 35% 20% Developers may seek a waiver or modification of development standards that have the effect of precluding the construction of a housing development meeting the density bonus criteria. The developer must show that the waiver or modification is necessary to make the housing units economically feasible. A developer can receive an incentive or concession based on the proportion of affordable units for target groups. Incentives or concessions may include, but are not limited to, a reduction in setback and square footage requirements and a reduction in the ratio of vehicular parking spaces. These concessions must demonstrably result in financially sufficient and actual cost reductions. BUILDING CODES AND ENFORCEMENT In addition to the previously mentioned land use controls, Lake Elsinore utilizes the 2010 California Building Standards Code to regulate building standards including housing, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes. The City utilizes its code enforcement powers in a manner that does not constrain housing development or improvement. The goal of the Code Enforcement Division is to find solutions to problems resulting from violations of the City's Municipal Code. To assist neighborhoods and businesses in preserving an appealing appearance, the City has established property maintenance standards. These standards are part of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and establish the minimal maintenance standards for properties. To ensure that the Municipal Code is followed, Code Enforcement Officers assist individuals in keeping their properties in compliance. The Code Enforcement Officers have the authority to expeditiously abate problems that may endanger the health, safety, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GEN E R_A L PLAN Chapter 6 CITY Or LADE is, LSINORE VVt DREAM and welfare of the community, which helps preserve the housing stock by requiring owners to maintain their properties in sound condition. The abatement process typically requires the clean-up or repair of properties that are found to be in violation of City Code. City staff promptly responds to property maintenance complaints and is available to work with property owners in preventing and correcting Code violations. The local enforcement of these codes does not add significantly to the cost of housing. ENERGY CONSERVATION Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations mandates uniform energy conservation standards for new construction. Minimum energy conservation standards implemented through Title 24 may increase initial construction costs throughout the State, but reduce operating expenses and expenditure of natural resources over the long run and contribute to the abatement of global warming. ON- AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Site improvements are a necessary component of the new development process. Improvements can include the laying of sewer and water lines and new streets for use by a community when that infrastructure is lacking, and these improvements make the development feasible. Developed residential areas in Lake Elsinore are served by existing infrastructure. Additional infrastructure is required for all new developments prior to occupancy of the units. In Lake Elsinore, required site improvements vary depending on the existing condition of each project. Typical off-site infrastructure improvements for new projects include constructing new streets, which include undergrounding of utilities, parkway landscaping, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting. Local residential streets require a dedication of 56 feet with a curb -to -curb width of 36 feet. Full infrastructure improvements and extension of infrastructure will more typically be associated with new single-family development, which would most likely serve moderate to above moderate residents. Lake Elsinore has a number of adequate sites with existing infrastructure. Multi -family residential developments, which would more likely serve the moderate, low income, and very low income developments, are strongly encouraged to locate on sites within Lake Elsinore with existing full or partial infrastructure improvements. This reduces costs on a project and facilitates the development of low and very low income residential units. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 67 Chapter 6 CITY Or LAKE LSIHOP E DREAM On-site improvements may include driveways, drive aisles, parking, landscaping, and utility laterals to serve the residential units. These improvements are not seen as constraints to development as efficient site planning should balance necessary on-site improvement costs to make affordable housing feasible. INFRASTRUCTURE Water Availabilihj The General Plan EIR accounts for future build -out of the City of Lake Elsinore and the identified sites to meet the RHNA are consistent with the General Plan vision. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provides water, wastewater, and reclaimed water service to the Lake Elsinore. EVMWD obtains approximately half of its water supply from groundwater and surface water from Railroad Canyon Reservoir (Canyon Lake). The remainder of the water supply is imported from sources such as the Colorado River aqueduct and State Water Project, and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California sources, Lake Skinner and Lake Mathews. Since the local population is expected to increase, additional water supply sources are necessary to meet future growth. Future supplies include the construction of a pump station that would increase capacity and plans to address groundwater overdraft through the implementation of the Back Basin Groundwater Storage Project. EVMWD also plans to complete multiple groundwater projects including new and replacement wells and a well blending pipeline. The EVMWD 2010 UWMP indicates that there are sufficient water supplies and water shortage contingency plans to protect existing and future water needs within its service area, to meet projected growth consistent with General Plan policy. Lake Elsinore s RHNA can be accommodated within the existing zoning and General Plan designated parcels in the City and therefore would not create an impact on water services beyond what was identified and analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Sewer The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provides sewer service for the City of Lake Elsinore. The EVMWD contains six sewersheds, operates three wastewater treatment facilities, and 358 miles of sewer mains up to 54 inches in diameter, and 33 lift C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL. PLAN 0.1 Chapter 6 L� jLSINORE DREAM E�CTREME stations. The EVMWD Wastewater Master Plan indicates the need for wastewater treatment plant expansions from the current 9.7 million gallons per day (mgd) to 16.2 mgd by the year 2020. The Plan calls for the abandoning of the 0.5 mgd Horsethief Canyon Plant, construction of a new Alberhill Plant with a 2020 year capacity of 3.0 mgd, and the expansion of the 8.0 Regional Plant to 12.0 mgd. This expansion plan will accommodate the 6.5 mgd anticipated increase in wastewater capacity. Additionally, the Plan proposes improvements to gravity sewers, force mains, and lift stations as part of the overall improvements to the wastewater system. The General Plan EIR indicated that the EVMWD has adequate sewer capacity to serve the General Plan buildout; however, sewer system improvements will be required and will be the responsibility of individual builders. FEES AND EXACTIONS Development and Planning Fees Various fees are collected by the City to cover costs of processing development permits. All application processing is by Cost Recovery System wherein applicants shall deposit funds in accordance with the best estimate of actual costs for staff time, noticing requirements, public hearings and documentation. Table 35 includes a comparison of Lake Elsinore permit deposits with those of neighboring jurisdictions. Application fees can pose a constraint on the production of housing units and adversely affect housing affordability, especially when they are higher than those found in surrounding communities. A survey of entitlement fees imposed by surrounding communities was conducted to determine how they compare to the development fees deposited in Lake Elsinore. Fees in Lake Elsinore as of February 2011, are comparable to, and often less than, those of surrounding communities, and do not represent a constraint on the production or preservation of housing, including affordable housing. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 69 GENE RAL PLAIN Chapter 6 Table 35 Entitlement Application Fees February 2011 CITY OF LADE O41-21LSINOB E i0p, DREAM Action/Activity Lake Elsinore* Murrieta Temecula Conditional Use Permit Minor (when processed in conjunction w/another development $3,401 $3,805 Deposit application) $3,441 Major (when processed alone) $5,601 $6,805 Deposit Design Review Commercial/Industrial $6,760+$120/acre Residential (including Tracts) $6,060+$3/unit Minor Design Review $2,050 N/A N/A Discretionary Administrative $3,910 Amendment DR (Comm/Ind) $2,050 Amendment DR (Residential( $4,060+$2/unit Development Agreement City Staff Review $15,500 City Attorney Review $2,000 $15,000 Deposit $51,581.00 Amendment $4,000 Environmental Other CEQA Review $1,500 $4,910 Environmental Impact Report $19,000 $15,000 Deposit N/A Mitigation Monitoring Program $8,000 Extension of Time Tentative Map $3,150 $1,623 $3,372 Minor Design Review - 1st Extension Request (Administrative $868 $1,623 $1,363-$2,687 Approval) Minor Design Review - 2"d Extension Request (PC/CC Approval) $1,618 General Plan Amendment $7,406 $10,000 Deposit $3,928-$7,278 Specific Plan (including amend) $21,677 $20,000 Deposit/$10,000 $78,424 Deposit Substantial Conformance $907 $5,794 Tentative Parcel Map Revised Ma after Minor -$3,200/ Map ( 2 years) ) $2'677 Major -$4,619 N/A CITY O E LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 70 Chapter 6 Table 35 CITY OF LAKE"LSIIYORE �"l`�' DREAD M EXr RF.MF. Entitlement Application Fees February 2011 Action/Activity Lake Elsinore* Murrieta Temecula Commercial/Industrial N/A $7,786 $5,355 Table 35 (Continued) Entitlement Application Fees February 2011 Action/Activity Lake Elsinore* Murrieta Temecula Commercial/Industrial $8,963 $7,786 $5,355 Residential Parcel Map $6,563 $7,126 $3,843 Revised Map (within 2 years) $2,618 Minor -$3,200/ Major -$4,619 N/A Revised Map (after 2 years) $2,677 Minor - $3,200/ Major - $4,619 N/A Tentative Tract Map $19,063 $12,700 $10,089414,624 Revised Map (within 2 years) $7,066 N/A $5,713-$8,044 Revised Map (after 2 years) $7,086 N/A N/A Variance $2,829 Adm -$1.,477 $3,708 PH -$2,971 Zone Change $5,851 $10,000 Deposit N/A "Includes Planning, Engineering, and Fire Department review fees. Source: Cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Temecula, February 2011 Projects involving new single-family or multi -family residential developments of 4 dwelling units or less require the application of a Minor Design Review, with an application deposit of $2,050. New single-family tracts and multi -family developments that involve more than four dwelling units require the application of a Residential Design Review, with an application deposit of $6,060 plus $3 per proposed residential unit. New single-family tracts and condominium developments would also include an application of a Tentative Tract Map with a flat deposit of $19,063. The Residential Design Review application always includes the payment of an environmental review deposit. The deposits range from $1,500 to $19,000 for an Initial Study to an Environmental Impact Report, which varies with project size and environmental sensitivity of the project area. Minor Design Reviews are exempt from environmental review deposits. CITY OF LAKE ELS I N O R E 71 G E N E R A L P I. A N Chapter 6 CITY O£� LAKE r2LSIHORE DREAM Once a residential project is approved by the City, the developer will then submit construction drawings for a building permit. Table 36 below lists a range of fees for single family building permit fees based on the square foot area of the home. The table also includes a typical multi -family unit permit cost, which is an average from the City's recent Pottery Court apartment project. Table 36 Building Permit Fees Action/Activity 1,800 s.f. SFR w/600 s.f, garage 2,000 s.f. SFR w/600 s.f. garage 2,500 s.f. SFR w/600 s.f. garage 855 s.f. typ MFR unit* Structural Plan Check $840 $896 $1,035 $360 Planning Review Fee $224 $239 $276 $96 Building Permit Fee $1,120 $1,195 $1,380 $480 TOTAL. $2,184 $2,330 $2,691 $936 "Fees are average of permits pulled on a 113 unit apartment project, 2011 In addition to planning application fees, many municipal jurisdictions charge development impact fees, and developers in turn incorporate those fees into housing costs, which can reduce the affordability of housing. These fees can include park fees, police and fire fees, and sewer and waterline fees imposed in accordance with new development. Table 37 shows that as of 2012, development impact fees for Lake Elsinore were generally less than those incurred in nearby communities of Murrieta and Temecula. These lower impact fees reduce constraints and expenses for moderate and low-income developers looking to build in the region. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE 72 GENE RAI. PLAN CITY (D Chapter 6 LADE �LSINOIZE � `ry DREAM Table 37a Single Family Development Impact Fees City Specific Fees Lake Elsinore Murrieta Temecula Wildomar Park Capital Improvement 1,600.00 3,828.93 3,037.14 563.00 Open Space None 529.33 885.25 3,637.00 Trails None 529.33 885.25 316.00 Traffic Impact 1,369.00 782.09 1,840.21 969.00 (Street System Improvement) Traffic Signals 133.33 260.49 Bridge, Freeway, Ramps 1,902.47 Library 150.00 210.60 808.93 341.00 Fire 751.00 668.31 631.59 705.00 Police 231.57 265.93 City Hall 809.00 269.49 499.26 1,207.00 Community Center 545.00 210.61 65.00 Marina Facilites 779.00 Animal Shelter 348.00 Drainage 1,000.00 1,530.49 Total City Fees 7,351.00 10,826.55 9,114.05 7,803.00 County Fees MSHCP< KANGAROO RAT< TUMF (same for all) 11,061 1.1,061 11,061 11,061 Total City and County 18,412 21,888 20,175 18,864 Note: All costs are per dwelling unit. Drainage fees for Lake Elsinore are figured on a "high" average for the most common areas for development. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 73 Chapter 6 Table 37b CITY OF LADELSI110RE -� DREAM Multi Family Development Impact Fees City Specific Fees Lake Elsinore Murrieta Temecula Wildomar Park Capital Improvement 1,500.00 2,412.23 2,175.86 472.00 Open Space 103.89 634.21 3,071.00 Trails 103.89 634.21 264.00 Traffic Impact 959.00 497.05 1,288.15 812.00 Traffic Signals 82.90 182.33 Bridge, Freeway, Ramps 1,208.93 Library 150.00 133.33 579.54 286.00 Fire 612.00 988.44 293.08 590.00 Police 240.56 470.49 City Hall 696.00 269.49 267.69 1,011.00 Community Center 469.00 133.34 55.00 Marina Facilities 671.00 Animal Shelter 299.00 Drainage 2,000.00 457.71 Total City Fees 7,356.00 6,631.76 6,525.56 6,561.00 County Fees MSHCP< KANGAROO RAT< TUMF (same for all) 7972 7972 7972 7972 Total City and County 15,328.00 14,603.76 14,497.56 14,533.00 Note: All costs are per dwelling unit. Drainage fees for Lake Elsinore are figured on a "high" average for the most common areas for development. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 74 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE C9?LSIH0RE DREAREME A 2012 National Impact Fee Survey polled 38 California jurisdictions and estimated an average total impact fee of $31,000 for single-family residences and $19,000 for multi- family units within the state.3 Lake Elsinore is on the lower end of the National Impact Fee Survey as the City assesses approximately $17,000 in total impact fees per single family unit and about $12,000 per multi family unit (excluding storm drain fees discussed below). Lake Elsinore has one development fee that is not included in the Development Impact Fee total: the Storm Drain impact fee. Lake Elsinore assesses the Storm Drain impact fee based on a project's Drainage District location on a per acre basis. With 50 Drainage Districts ranging from $2,225-$8,675/acre, this results in multiple variations in the final calculation of impact fees with no absolute range. Even so, total impact fees still are less than the averages reported in the National Impact Fee Survey. Capacity charges are another common source of capital funding. Under California Government Code Section 66000, public agencies are allowed to impose capacity charges at the time a new customer connects for the first time. The purpose of the charge is to recover the reasonable cost of facilities attributable to development. Funds from this capacity charge will be used for replacing and renewing existing facilities and for upgrading and constructing facilities required to expand the system to build -out. PROCESSING AND PERMIT PROCEDURES The processing time required to obtain approval of development permits is often cited as a contributing factor to the high cost of housing. For some proposed development projects, additional time is needed to complete the environmental review process before an approval can be granted. Unnecessary delays add to the cost of construction by increasing land holding costs and interest payments. The review process in Lake Elsinore involves up to three levels of reviewing bodies: Planning Staff, Planning Commission, and the City Council. The majority of residential developments in the City are single-family homes or small subdivisions which do not require lengthy processing time. All new multi -family residential developments must complete a development plan application, which is then reviewed and approved, conditionally approved, or rejected by the appropriate body. Table 38 provides a list of average processing times for the various permits or 3 Source: Duncan Associates, 2012 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 75 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE CpLSIIYOIZE ,V DILEAM EXTREME procedures that may be required prior to the final approval of a project. As can be seen in this table, the processing times required for the various entitlement applications are reasonable and do not represent a constraint to, or contribute to the cost of, the development or preservation of housing. These timeframes are approximate and depend on the scope of the project, number of corrections in plan check, and timeliness of the applicant's resubmittal. In addition, projects requiring environmental review and/or appeals may take substantially longer to process. Table 38 Development Review Timeframes Approximate Type of Process Timeframe Reviewing Body Planning Commission/ City Council *If project is within a specific plan, Design Review 4-8 months shorter review may be applicable 2 weeks/check Pt check; I week Plan Check/Building Permits resubmittals Building Division Conditional Use Permit 3-5 months Planning Commission Variance Up to 6 months Planning Commission Tentative Parcel/Tract Map 4-8 months Planning Commission/City Council General Plan Amendment 4-6 months Planning Commission/ City Council Zone Change 4-6 months Planning Commission/ City Council Source: Lake Elsinore City Staff, April 2012 The City's development timeframes are designed to accommodate development. The average processing times for single-family and multi -family projects vary depending upon the size of the development and if a subdivision map is involved. Small Residential Projects All Minor Design Review (single-family residences and multi -family projects involving four or less units) projects and Conditional Use Permits require approval from the Planning Commission. Small homes constructed on existing lots of record could be CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 76 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKELSIIYOKE ��� Oaen�r�ne issued permits within five to six weeks of Planning Commission approval, including Planning and Building and Safety review. Larger Residential Projects All Zone Changes, Specific Plans, Planned Unit Developments, Subdivisions (Parcel and Tract Maps) and Design Review (Residential projects involving four or more units) are required to be approved by the City Council unless the project is within an approved specific plan which may provide a shorter approval process. Apartment developments require Planning Commission and City Council approval. As such, the development process is increased by approximately three months from the small residential projects timeline. Larger projects with many corrections required during Building review typically take longer to process. Subdivisions Before a developer or property owner makes any division of land or real property located in the City, a tentative map is required in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. Once an application is deemed complete and within 50 days of the application being filed with the City, the Planning Commission will act on the tentative map and either recommend approval, recommend conditional approval, or recommend denial. At a subsequent regular meeting, after receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council will act on the tentative map and either approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove it. A proposed subdivision can be denied by the City Council if it does not meet all of the requirements of the Municipal Code, or if the City Council makes any of the following findings: • That the proposed division of land is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans • That the design or improvement of the proposed division of land is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans • That the site of the proposed division of land is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development • That the design of the proposed division of land or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat • That the design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 77 Chapter 6 CITY OF LADE �LSINOBJE V DREAM EXTREME • That the design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed division of land. The City Council may approve a division of land if it finds that alternative easements for access or for use will be provided, and that they will be subsequently equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. Design Review Process The City of Lake Elsinore's processing for land use entitlement approval includes review by the Design Review Committee (DRC). Part of the DRC review process includes ensuring projects are consistent with the requirements of LEMC Section 17.184- Design Review. Applicants may review this section of the code in order to understand and be consistent with the guidelines the DRC will be using to assess the project. A Design Review entitlement application requires a public hearing and the adoption of specific findings, including: • The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the zoning district in which the project is located. • The project complies with the design directives contained in LEMC Section 17.184.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. • Conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC Section 17.184.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. The approval process for both smaller and larger residential projects includes submitting a development application and fees to the City and completing the Design Review process (see Figure 4). Smaller projects may receive approval at a public meeting scheduled after the project has completed the Design Review Committee process. Larger projects are first reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public meeting and then forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation of approval or denial, unless the project is within an approved specific plan which may provide a shorter approval process. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE 78 GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 Figure 4 - Land Use Entitlement Process Subrnidai Process Applicant Sutirnits Application and Associated Rems Prgectis assigsedtoa Project Plannee indial Plan Review " •vupct n ass .W mn (r)Mb mda>s awcnnlai. neyutca ec be caryzMd by srnwann mnyjjai ansa aa,s a o -R nate n warC.ai. ^APphant%f OeCok (a IM 0.ac tr Mh Nel51 M6hYa5 C3rb. ' rroect n scnmworar PJM ns:trgtHearngwmn ten(gwaxm lays aw[RC process. ,e baa rice@RS MRacm WO stove 0,6 nM ncUle CS.IA a PMHCPanat %Ary BdCemM= requkes 0E %G CPA"a Xray addW=baC and steps W Ne.amC oapewrq entl'A 0br alay6trequked. CITY of LADE ?LSINOIZE DREAM The City's average development processing times are typical of those for surrounding jurisdictions. They allow for State -mandated review periods for environmental documents as well as for legally advertised and noticed public hearings. In addition, the City of Lake Elsinore, like surrounding jurisdictions, is required to adhere to the development review timeframes mandated by the State Permit Streamlining Act. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit is an entitlement application which requires a public hearing and the adoption of specific findings, including: C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E 79 G E N E R A L P L A N Chapter 6 CITY Of^ LAI,E �LSIRORE �V DREAD M EXTREME • The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. • The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. • The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required in this Title. • The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. • That in approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. • That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC Section 17.168.50 have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. The purpose and intent of the conditional use permit is to ensure that these uses which are not permitted by right are located, planned, and used in such a manner as not to be detrimental to the abutting properties and to the community as a whole. Conditions of approval are utilized to preserve the integrity and character of the zoning district, the utility and value of adjacent property, and the general welfare of the neighborhood and the public. Conditions can include such requirements as special yards and fencing, specific parking and circulation requirements, street and/or alley dedications, landscaping, regulations of noise and other nuisances, and height and residential density limitations. Residential uses requiring a conditional use permit include large family day care and rest homes. HOUSING FOR DISABLED PERSONS State law requires localities to analyze potential and actual constraints upon housing for persons with disabilities, demonstrate efforts to remove governmental constraints, and include programs to accommodate housing designed for people with disabilities. The City has no special zoning or land use restrictions that regulate the siting of housing for persons with disabilities. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENE RAL PLAN EN Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE iD9 LSI14OIZE �410" DREAM In accordance with State law, Lake Elsinore permits State -licensed residential care facilities serving six or fewer persons in all of its residential zoning districts by right. Several housing types for persons with disabilities are permitted by right or require a discretionary permit that is no more stringent than those for other conditional uses. Rest homes are permitted with a conditional use permit in the R-2 and R-3 multi -family areas. Inclusion of an overly restrictive definition of a "family" in the zoning code may have the potential of discriminating against group homes or other housing for persons with disabilities on the basis of familial status. The Lake Elsinore Municipal Code defines family as "one or more persons immediately related by blood, marriage or adoption living together as a single housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit together with any domestic employees. A group of not more than six (6) unrelated persons living together as a single housekeeping unit with their domestic employees shall also be considered a family." The City acknowledges that the definition of "family" may cause the misperception by the public that development can be restricted to blood related families. As part of its review of the LEMC, the City intends to revise or remove the definition of family and rely more generally on the term "household." As stated above, the City has adopted the California Building Standards Code. Standards within the Code include provisions to ensure accessibility for persons with disabilities. These standards are consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act. No local amendments. that would constrain accessibility or increase the cost of housing for persons with disabilities have been adopted. To accommodate disabled persons in public facilities, the City defers to Title 24 of the California Handicap Accessibility Code. Reasonable Accommodation The Fair Housing Act, as amended in 1988, requires that cities and counties provide reasonable accommodation to rules, policies, practices and procedures where such accommodation may be necessary to afford individuals with disabilities equal housing opportunities. While fair housing laws intend that all people have equal access to housing, the law also recognizes that people with disabilities may need extra tools to achieve equality. Reasonable accommodation is one of the tools intended to further housing opportunities for people with disabilities. For developers and providers of housing for people with disabilities who are often confronted with siting or use restrictions, reasonable accommodation provides a means of requesting from the local government flexibility in the application of land use and zoning regulations or, in some instances, even a waiver of certain restrictions or requirements because it is necessary to CITY OF LAKE E LS WORE GENERAL PLAN 181 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE �LSI1`IOIZE V__-, _ DREAM achieve equal access to housing. Cities and counties are required to consider requests for accommodations related to housing for people with disabilities and provide the accommodation when it is determined to be "reasonable" based on fair housing laws and the case law interpreting the statutes. State law allows for a statutorily based four-part analysis to be used in evaluating requests for reasonable accommodation related to land use and zoning matters and can be incorporated into reasonable accommodation procedures. This analysis gives great weight to furthering the housing needs of people with disabilities and also considers the impact or effect of providing the requested accommodation on the City and its overall zoning scheme. Developers and providers of housing for people with disabilities must be ready to address each element of the following four-part analysis: • The housing that is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation is for people with disabilities as defined in federal or state fair housing laws; • The reasonable accommodation requested is necessary to make specific housing available to people with disabilities who are protected under fair housing laws; • The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the local government; and • The requested accommodation will not result in a fundamental alteration in the local zoning code. To create a process for making requests for reasonable accommodation to land use and zoning decisions and procedures regulating the siting, funding, development and use of housing for people with disabilities, the City will create and adopt a reasonable accommodation procedure and provide information to residents via their public counters and website. Environmental Constraints Significant environmental and infrastructure constraints often hamper development of sufficient housing for all economic segments. The paragraphs below address potential environmental and infrastructure constraints to residential development in Lake Elsinore. These issues are discussed in more detail in the Public Safety and Welfare Element of the General Plan. Federal and State regulations require environmental review of proposed discretionary projects (e.g., subdivision maps, use permits, etc.). Costs resulting from the C IT Y OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 82 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE �LSIRORE I't^-� DRCAREME environmental review process are bundled into the cost of housing and are passed on to the consumer. These costs include fees charged by local government and private consultants needed to complete the environmental analyses and from delays caused by the mandated public review periods. However, the presence of these regulations helps to preserve the environment and ensure environmental safety for Lake Elsinore residents. Environmental constraints can significantly affect the creation of new housing in a community. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, significant portions of Lake Elsinore and its Sphere of Influence are located within a 100- year flood zone. Several flooding sources have been identified within the City, including Arroyo del Toro, Channel H, Elsinore Spillway Channel, Lake Elsinore, Leach Canyon Channel, Lime Street Channel, McVicker Canyon, Ortega Wash and others. New development projects are required to consider flooding and storm drainage effects in their design. Limited encroachment into the 100 -year floodplain fringe of roads, parks, sewer and water improvements, and pedestrian routes is allowed in order to permit development of properties within this area. The City reviews development projects within the floodplain to ensure compliance with City, state, and federal floodplain management. The City of Lake Elsinore and its Sphere of Influence are located within the Elsinore fault system. The Elsinore fault consists of multiple strands, a number of which are recognized as active and zoned by the State of California under the Alquist-Priolo Act. Risk of surface rupture along these zoned active traces is substantial. The Elsinore fault is believed to be capable of generating earthquakes with magnitudes in the range of 6.5 to 7.5. Thus, the City and the Sphere of Influence are likely to experience repeated moderate to strong ground shaking generated by the Elsinore fault in the foreseeable future. To reduce effects on development, the City may require site-specific remediation measures during the development review process to minimize impacts of fault activity. The applicable Building Codes also includes requirements to prevent earthquake damage. In addition, a large portion of the City falls into a very high fire hazard severity zone as defined by the California Fire/CDF State Plane. The steep terrain and frequent high - velocity wind conditions in these areas contributes to rapid spread of wildfire when one occurs. The City requires fuel modification zones around development within these high hazard areas by thinning or clearing vegetation within 100 feet of buildings and structures. C IT Y OF L A K E E L S I N O R E 83 GENERAL. PLAN Chapter 6 CITYOP � LAKE CpLSIHOIZE �t DREAM In addition to considering environmental conditions, before a development permit is granted, it must be established that public service and facilities systems are adequate to accommodate any increased demand generated by a proposed project. Lake Elsinore relies upon other government agencies, private utility companies, and contractors to maintain and upgrade many of the community's major infrastructure systems. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RM G E N E R A L P L AN Chapter 6 CITY Of LAKE 42LSINOU DREAM 6,4 Housing Resources — Site Inventory and Analysis This section summarizes the land, financial, and administrative resources available for the development and preservation of housing in Lake Elsinore. The analysis includes an evaluation of the availability of land resources for future housing development; the City's ability to satisfy its share of the region's future housing needs, the financial resources available to support housing activities, and the administrative resources available to assist in implementing the City's housing programs and policies. Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Lake Elsinore' Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the 2014-2021 planning period has been determined by SCAG to be 4,929 housing units, including 1,196 units for very low-income households, 801 units for low-income households, 897 units for moderate -income households, and 2,035 units for above moderate -income households. AVAILABILITY OF SITES FOR HOUSING Identifying Adequate Sites State law requires that a community provide an adequate number of sites to allow for and facilitate production of the City's regional share of housing. To determine whether the City has sufficient land to accommodate its share of regional housing needs for all income groups, the City must identify "adequate sites." Under State law (California Government Code sections 65583), adequate sites are those with appropriate zoning and development standards, with services and facilities, needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing for all income levels. Land considered suitable for residential development includes the following: • Vacant residentially zoned sites • Vacant non -residentially zoned sites that allow residential uses (such as mixed- use) • Underutilized residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density or with greater intensity CITY OF LAKE ELS I NORE GENERAL PLAN 85 Chapter 6 CITY of LADE �LSINORE . DREAM • Non-residential zoned sites that can be redeveloped for, and/or rezoned for, residential use (via program actions) An important component of the Lake Elsinore Housing Element is the identification of sites and future housing development opportunities for the 2014-2021 planning period. Since Lake Elsinore has a sufficient amount of undeveloped land, the majority of what is identified in the Sites Inventory section focuses on vacant sites zoned for residential or mixed-use. Underutilized sites are also analyzed. Opportunities for residential development in the City fall into one of these categories: • Vacant land that is designated for residential or mixed-use • Underutilized sites that permit residential or mixed-use where the current use of the property is less than the maximum allowed by the general plan designation, and where infrastructure needs for additional development can be met by existing or proposed systems The following maps identify sites within the City that fall under one of the categories identified above. The "Key Map' at the top left-hand corner of each map outlines the geographic location of the area within the City. The Planning Area for each location corresponds with the Specific Plan or area identified in the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) map. Residential Sites Inventory and Analysis of Suitability and Availability The sites identified in the maps are locations determined to be ideal for accommodating future housing, including affordable housing. Analyses based on potential environmental constraints, infrastructure, and realistic development capacity calculations are discussed. The maps also include an analysis of non -vacant and underutilized lands that are listed in Table 41. The sites inventory includes properties within the Commercial Mixed Use, High Density, and Residential Mixed Use designations (see Table 39), as well as two specific plan areas. Densities permitted pursuant to High Density Residential and Residential Mixed Use designations permit 24 units per acre, which would be sufficient to facilitate affordable housing. The Commercial Mixed Use designation permits up to 18 units per acre, and would be consistent with the moderate and above moderate income categories. The High Density and Residential Mixed Use categories are the only two categories utilized to identify units to meet the lower income required RI -INA. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 CITY OF LADE �LSIR0RE -�V DREAM Mixed use designations were calculated based upon the General Plan and Zoning Code requirements within the Commercial Mixed Use and Residential Mixed Use designations. The General Plan states that Commercial Mixed Use properties shall contain a minimum of 50 percent commercial uses. Therefore, the sites analysis provides a range of potential dwelling units based upon the minimum and maximum allowable residential densities for the Commercial Mixed Use designation (see Appendix A for specific site listings). The Commercial Mixed Use designation was calculated based upon the median allowable density, providing a conservative estimate of potential above -moderate and moderate housing within the planning area. The Residential Mixed Use designation allows a maximum density of 24 dwelling units per acre An additional 20- to 35 -percent of the building square footage may be utilized for commercial uses as an incentive for mixed use development. This is in addition to permitted residential development. Therefore, a two -acre Residential Mixed Use development could propose a 48- unit housing development with additional space for commercial uses- up to 35 -percent of the building square footage. Table 39 Lake Elsinore Demographic Projections and Density General Plan Designation Density Range Allowable Residential Composition Commercial Mixed Use Residential Mixed Use High Density Residential Specific Plan 7-18 dwelling units per acre 19-24 dwelling units per acre 19-24 dwelling units per acre Varies 0-50% Residential 100% Residential 100% Residential Varies Demographic projections and density calculations are consistent with the General Plan's estimate for the buildout. A maximum of 80 -percent of the site acreage was estimated for residential development (see Appendix A for specific site listings). The sites analysis multiplies the reduced acreage by the maximum allowable density (24 dwelling units per acre). This results in a fairly conservative estimate of potential development of sites within the City. Multi -family, affordable development within the City has proven to exceed this estimate. An example of this is the Pottery Court affordable housing apartment complex, which was entitled at a density of 26 dwelling units per acre, well exceeding the General Plan estimates (as detailed later in this section under CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 87 IR .. A 1-4 a W z w x � W o a w W ¢ w 0 H w O a w z w .Y w d O � Z z � a w :G d w w O H U 14 Old, ro.7 w `i I a W z L=7 X A O � z� a A W N W L=. 0 U I w O IN a d w z w .a O 0 w w w w 0 41 U U) 0 U L- 0 O on X nm W U O LL 3 c o n N Lq �p Gc N V N N ¢ E o E � o rn U 2 y 55 75 NcoN a o C L N N E N N® J O� o a w a Q d w z w w � 3 o zo z � a a h w Q w w O 7- H U N N a Q w z w w 3 o ° zC\j a w h W u a w O N U W a W W d w 0 0 N N N X_ X N O 5 U _ � Q W W N E E � h N U f d o U N K `m d «_ j 0 Ii D Sc U 0 Cc 0 d' U o E _ 8 o a)x E x 8i `� N 00011 mi 2 w -01 W a W W d w 0 0 N z Q a d W Z ((W V � .a � z za a w W w H U U _U 0 U U N Go Z O O O O O O c N 0 N C N � w = a o � = v N x E x .a Y co) f J 0 a d w z .Y rw V G ..D w C O s Z o � a � w w d w w O H U .M-. 'm W C4 O W w O LI a .-1 L'. Q w z w A O � � � O w N N Q all w W w O H U O m U C m ry L I w z w w o �o w � a w Q w O H v X W CL U �U N Q U) 70 C O E cu rm,, co C 0 O � o coo 0 N � V Q O O O ti N O O T M C _ d a � C W-4 d w w z �Y (W h K .a � o z� w a w w Q w 0 H Chapter 6 VACANTLAND CITY OF LAKE LSII COKE V&-- DREAM State law requires that jurisdictions demonstrate in the Housing Element that the land inventory is adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the region's projected growth. Lake Elsinore is a growing community and has a sufficient amount of vacant land to meet its regional housing need as allocated by SCAG. The City's inventory of vacant land that would realistically be suitable for residential development totals over 790 acres, as identified in Table 41. This list does not include all vacant sites within the City. Rather, these vacant sites are ones that the City identifies as best suited for meeting the City's share of the regional housing need. Only land within the High Density, Residential Mixed Use, Commercial Mixed Use designations or Specific Plans were identified to provide for the City RHNA share. Together with underutilized sites, there is the potential to yield 5,925 units without utilizing a density bonus. Should developers choose to use density bonus opportunities, the capacity would be even higher. Table 41 summarizes Lake Elsinore's residential development potential of vacant and underutilized sites. Estimates of potential capacity on the vacant or underutilized land are based on an assumption of 80 -percent of the available acreage being developed (not including a density bonus), multiplied by a density of 24 dwelling units per acre in higher density areas. Potential capacity of Commercial Mixed Use areas is based on median density, to provide a conservative estimate. These methods are consistent with projections contained in the General Plan. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 113 Chapter 6 CITY OF �el�l� LADE �LSIHOiZE `ry "DREAM F.Xipumr. Table 41 Residential Capacity on Vacant and Underutilized Sites Underutilized Sites Underutilized sites account for a very small portion of the sites identified to accommodate the City's regional housing need. Underutilized sites have the potential to yield approximately 349 C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 114 Lake Edge/Lake View District Residential Under- Capacity Focus Density Estimated Vacant utilized w/o density Area Land Use Designation Range Density Acreage Acreage bonus, 18 Lake Elsinore Hills District 7-18 du/ac 18 28.37 18.65 294 1 Riverview District 9 5 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 143.64 1.96 923 Lake View District 19-24 du/ac 24 9.85 -- 189 2 Historic District Residential Mixed Use 6 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 18.24 -- 350 Lake Edge/Lake View District 19-24 du/ac 24 3.93 1.66 107 3 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 9.62 -- 185 1,401 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 39.93 1.22 257 Underutilized Sites Underutilized sites account for a very small portion of the sites identified to accommodate the City's regional housing need. Underutilized sites have the potential to yield approximately 349 C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 114 Lake Edge/Lake View District 8 4 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 26.38 2.82 561 18 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 28.37 18.65 294 Riverview District 9 5 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 18.57 356 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 9.85 -- 189 Historic District Residential Mixed Use 6 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 5.24 1.00 120 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 3.93 1.66 107 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 0.62 -- 4 1,401 Historic District Diamond Specific Plan 7 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 5.06 4.57 185 Mixed Use Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 2.30 -- 44 Underutilized Sites Underutilized sites account for a very small portion of the sites identified to accommodate the City's regional housing need. Underutilized sites have the potential to yield approximately 349 C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 114 Historic District 8 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.91 170 Commercial Mixed Use 7-18 du/ac 18 1.86 23 Business District 9 High Density Residential 19-24 du/ac 24 18.57 356 Business District 10 Residential Mixed Use 19-24 du/ac 24 8.7 156 Alberhill Ranch - Brighton 11 Specific Plan 5-30 du/ac varies 400 1,401 Diamond Specific Plan 12 Mixed Use max 24 du <18 87 -- 600 TOTAL: - 791.3 31.87 5,925 Underutilized Sites Underutilized sites account for a very small portion of the sites identified to accommodate the City's regional housing need. Underutilized sites have the potential to yield approximately 349 C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLA N 114 Chapter 6 CITY OF r"n LAKE LSINORE DKEA units. In contrast, vacant sites can accommodate more than the regional housing need (4,929 units) with the potential to yield 5,576 units. Appendix A lists the underutilized sites identified in each focus area and provides a description of the current use and potential capacity for the sites. The underutilized sites identified within the sites analysis are limited to those sites with one single-family residence or a small commercial building onsite. In addition, the sites identified are located adjacent to vacant parcels, creating the potential for one developer to consolidate lots and redevelop a larger area into a single affordable housing project. The City already has a successful history with consolidating vacant and underutilized sites with the Pottery Court affordable housing development. Underutilized sites similar to the circumstances of Pottery Court were identified within the sites analysis for potential units. Further discussion regarding the City's ability to work with developers to consolidate lots, including those with existing underutilized development, is included in the discussion on Affordable Housing Projects. Suitable Sites Over 200 acres of Residential Mixed Use and High Density residential designated land (see Focus Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and the Diamond Specific Plan) have been determined to be most suitable for accommodating the City's affordable housing need. These vacant and underutilized sites are located in the City's Lake View District, Historic District, Business District, and within the Diamond Specific Plan. The High Density Residential and Residential Mixed Use designations allow densities of up to 24 dwelling units per acre or more without approval of a density bonus. Historic District The Historic District (see Focus Areas 6, 7, and 8) is an ideal location for development of future affordable housing, as it is located within close proximity to downtown Lake Elsinore. In addition, there are commercial shopping areas within 1/4 mile of the opportunity sites. Public transit is available throughout this area, with a bus stop at Graham and Langstaff and transfer stations at the Wal-Mart located on the east side of the Interstate -1.5 freeway at Grape Street. This service line connects with Downtown Lake Elsinore, the Senior Center, and the Lake Elsinore Outlets. The majority of underutilized residentially zoned sites listed in Table 41 are within the Historic District areas (see Focus Areas 6, 7, and 8). The two highest -density land uses, High Density Residential and Residential Mixed Use, are located in the Historic District. The identified sites include vacant and underutilized properties that present opportunities to consolidate parcels to provide larger affordable housing developments. CITY OF LAKE ELSINOPE GENERAL PLA N 115 Chapter 6 CITY OF y� LADE 9 LSINORE ,M DREA �M Assuming development at 80 -percent of the total acreage for these designations, Focus Areas within the Historic District have the potential to yield 653 dwelling units without considering density bonuses; 626 of these are at densities capable of supporting low- and very low-income housing. A parcel -specific listing of the available sites is provided in Appendix A. Bnsiness District The Business District (see Focus Areas 9 and 10) provides a suitable location for affordable housing in an area that contains many vacant parcels with the potential to develop live -work projects. Focus Area 10 is composed entirely of vacant parcels. Approximately 8.7 acres of vacant Residential Mixed Use property could be utilized to provide affordable housing within this Focus Area. After identifying parcels for potential consolidation, there is the opportunity to provide 156 units for affordable housing in Focus Area 10, not including potential density bonuses. The Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Area Specific Plan The Brighton area is a portion of the larger Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. The Brighton area is a 400 -acre master planned community, planned for mixed land use development. Historically used for mining, large areas of land are available for new development once the resources are fully extracted. The Brighton area has completed a Vested Tentative Tract Map for future construction of 1,401 dwelling units and 1,358,000 square feet of commercial/office. Three areas would permit high density (30 du/acre) residential development (PA 1, 3, and 5). The table below provides a breakdown of Brighton planning areas with residential unit yields: Table 42 The Alberhill Ranch - Brighton Specific Plan Residential Summary Planning Area Acres Total Units Commercial SF Planning Area 1 - Suburban Village 9.8 40 299,739 Planning Area 2 - SFR II 161.2 534 Planning Area 3 - Suburban Village 34.6 80 1,058,261 Planning Area 4 - SFR II 18.7 71 Planning Area 5 - I -IDR 11.5 225 Planning Area - SFR I 164.5 451 TOTAL 400.3 1,401 1,358,000 Source: City of Lake Elsinore, WrM No. 35001 CITY OF LAKE. ELS INORE GEN ERAL P L A N 116 Chapter 6 The Diamond Specific Plan CITY OF�� LAKE �LSIl` 0RE , `N DREAM The Diamond Specific Plan is an 87 -acre master planned mixed-use development providing for commercial, office, educational, entertainment, and residential uses. The Specific Plan designates the entire developable area as Mixed -Use land use to allow flexibility in the development of the plan. Density or intensity of an individual development within the Diamond Specific Plan may exceed the General Plan allowed density provided that the overall density of the project site as an average does not exceed the General Plan density or the development caps established by the Specific Plan. The Plan allows for the development of up to 600 multi -family residential units, 897,000 square feet of commercial -retail space and a 1.50 - room hotel. The table below provides a breakdown of The Diamond Specific Plan planning areas with residential unit yields: Table 43 The Diamond Specific Pian Residential Summary Planning Area Acres Total Units Commercial SF Planning Area 1- Lakeshore 7.1 50 82,000 Planning Area 2 - Community Core 27.5 275 590,000 Planning Area 3 - Waterfront 7.3 0 30,000 Planning Area 4 - Stadium 16.1 0 35,000 Planning Area 5 - Malaga North 11.7 50 110,000 Planning Area 6 - Malaga South 11.7 225 50,000 Roads 5.8 TOTAL 87.2 600 897,000 Source: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division Appendix A includes all parcels from the Focus Areas to demonstrate their individual and overall contribution toward the City's RHNA. SMALL SITES Lake Elsinore Historic Subdivision Trends The City of Lake Elsinore has been known as a resort community since its incorporation in 1888. Lake Elsinore had many vacation homes and bungalows that were developed in the first half of the 201h Century, and was a major draw for tourist -centered activities. Property throughout the City was subdivided into small lots (some as little as 25 -feet by 100 -feet in size) during the late CITY OF LAKE E L S I N O R E GENERAL PLAN 117 Chapter 6 CITY OF r4*," LADE LSINORE *__4 DREAM EXTREME 1800's and early 1900's in order to cater lot sales to tourists, vacationers, and other out-of-town purchasers. With regard to Focus Areas 6 through 9 and all parcels within the Historic District of Lake Elsinore, the lot patterns and sizes reflect the then -practice of subdividing properties into multiple small lots for speculative sale in a resort community. In the 100 years since, development approaches have evolved to require much larger parcels to achieve more economically viable and desirable housing products. Thus, developers look to lot consolidation as the preferred method of creating optimal building sites in downtown Lake Elsinore, and the City has been a partner in encouraging this practice. Small Sites Analysis The sites analysis identifies sites throughout the City that have the highest potential for development as new housing and affordable housing projects. Some sites identified are small and may not be as conducive for a large-scale development as larger parcels. Thus, the City has focused its analysis on sites located adjacent to other underutilized or vacant parcels that could be consolidated for a larger project. In fact, many small parcels throughout the City have not been identified as potential sites because they are not located adjacent to other parcels that could be consolidated to create a larger project. Small sites are identified in Focus Areas 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Appendix A identifies all properties within the focus areas that are considered small sites and groups the sites together to analyze consolidation potential. Table 44 is a summary of the lot consolidation potential for the focus areas. CITY OF LAKE ELSIN0RE GENERAL PLAN 118 Chapter 6 Table 44 Lot Consolidation Summary CITY OF .o^n LADE LSII` RE DREAD M E?fTREME FOCUS AREA Consolidation Acres Capacity Potential High Density Residential' Mixed Use2 Historic District — Focus Area 6 6.24 136 75 75 Historic District — Focus Area 7 11.93 229 146 127 19 Historic District — Focus Area 8 8.91 170 170 170 Business District — Focus Area 9a 7.79 150 128 128 Business District — Focus Area 9b 6.73 145 122 122 Business District — Focus Area 9c 3.77 72 39 39 Business District — Focus Area 10a 3.25 51 51 51 Business District — Focus Area 10b 5.45 105 101 101 The Diamond Specific Plan 58.00 600 600 600 TOTAL 112.07 1,638 1,432 491 941 1. Refers to all High Density designated parcels that can be consolidated. 2. Refers to all Mixed Use parcels that can be consolidated. 3. The Diamond Specific Plan includes a total of 600 dwelling units to be constructed within four Planning Areas. Lot Consolidation Small sites are identified in Focus Areas 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and the Diamond Specific Plan. Sites identified within these focus areas are located adjacent to one another and result in larger parcels of land available for potential lot consolidation and development of a single project. According to HCD, most assisted housing developments utilizing State or Federal financing resources typically include at least 50 to 80 units. Appendix A identifies several areas for consolidation that are smaller in size than the recommended yield of 50 to 80 dwelling units. However, in reviewing HCD's list of Rental Housing Complexes available in Riverside County and San Bernardino County, it is evident that projects of 50 dwelling units or less for Low and Very Low income levels have been constructed throughout Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The following cities are identified as having projects of 50 units or less on the lists: • Lake Elsinore • Desert Hot Springs • Palm Springs • Coachella C I TY O F L A K E E L S I N O R E G E N E R A I. P L A N 119 Chapter 6 • Mecca • Blythe • San Bernardino • Upland • Barstow • Mentone • Joshua Tree CITY OF n_Nll LADE LSIROIZE DREA In addition, the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition has identified affordable housing projects of fewer than 50 dwelling units in the cities of Riverside, Cathedral City, Indio, and Moreno Valley in addition to the cities identified on the HCD Rental Complexes list. Therefore, the sites analysis has identified some potential areas for lot consolidation where fewer than 50 dwelling units can be built, similar to projects that have been approved and constructed throughout the Inland Empire. Parcel Mergers The City of Lake Elsinore has approved and completed 15 parcel merger applications between 2004 and 2012 (see Table 45). These applications resulted in the consolidation of multiple lots into one or two lots, including one merger that consolidated three lots into a single lot within an area permitting up to 24 dwelling units per acre. The City works with developers to approve lot consolidations in order to design projects that will result in a single cohesive development, rather than smaller projects located on multiple lots. As a result, the small sites identified within the City could be consolidated through the Parcel Merger process to create larger projects in multiple areas of the City. In Lake Elsinore, projects also combine lots through a tentative parcel map process. For example, the Pottery Court development combined 23 existing parcels into a 4.3 acre site to facilitate the construction of the 113 unit residential development. This project consisted of 111 very low-income units and two units reserved for resident managers. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 120 G E N E RA L P L A N Chapter 6 Table 45 Parcel Merger Applications CITY OF LAKE' E CpLSINORE -` DIVA Parcel Merger Original No. of No. Lots Final No. of Lots Existing Zoning Existing Density 2004-06 3 1 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2004-10 4 2 R-1 6 Units / Acre 2004-11 3 1 R-1 6 Units / Acre 2005-21 3 2 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2006-09 4 2 R-1 6 Units / Acre 2006-16 3 1 R-3 24 Units / Acre 2007-10 3 1 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2007-19 4 2 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2008-03 3 1 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2009-21 4 1 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2010-1084 2 1 CMU 18 Units/Acre 2010-1278 2 1 RMU 24 Units/Acre 2012-471 2 1 Specific Plan Specific Plan 2012-597 2 1 R-2 12 Units / Acre 2012-1130 2 1 R-1 6 Units / Acre ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Potential environmental constraints to future development of sites include the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and seismic and flooding hazards, which are addressed in the Non -Governmental Constraints Section of the Housing Element. Significant portions of Lake Elsinore and its Sphere of Influence are located within a 100 -year flood zone and also lie within the Elsinore fault system. Any sites located within a 100 -year flood zone are required to comply with City, State, and federal floodplain management as part of the Development Review process. To reduce seismic effects on development, the City may require site-specific remediation measures during the development review process to minimize impacts of fault activity. The applicable Building Codes also include requirements to prevent earthquake damage. To limit wildfire hazards, the City requires fuel modification zones around development within high hazard areas by thinning or clearing vegetation within 100 feet of buildings and structures. The Development Review process identifies potential hazards and CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 121 Chapter 6 CITY OF ,4� LADE '� LSIIYORE DR ♦" EA requires projects mitigate these hazards prior to project approval. None of the sites identified are significantly more hazardous than any other sites within in the City. The sites inventoried in Appendix A have a residential land use designation and zoning in place which was determined based on surrounding land uses and has already examined potential environmental constraints as part of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. Aside from the constraints mentioned above, few additional constraints would impede the development of new housing units in the future on the identified sites. INFRASTRUCTURE The General Plan indicates that unimproved or badly deteriorated roadways, roadways without sufficient capacity for anticipated new development, inadequate storm drain infrastructure, insufficient parkland and recreation facilities, and inadequate public safety facilities are in need of repair and/or improvement. The City understands that improvements can be achieved with a comprehensive approach that includes reviewing infrastructure plans for each application for discretionary approval of General Plan amendments, tentative parcel or tentative tract maps, or development proposals that include extension of an existing street or construction of a new street. The City requires that project applications for new development be reviewed for adequate infrastructure. Applications are evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure there is the capacity to service new developments. Infrastructure requirements and costs are also discussed in the Non -Governmental Constraints Section of the Housing Element. COMPARISON OF SITES INVENTORY AND RHNA More than adequate land is available to accommodate the City's regional share of housing through the 2014-2021 planning period. The City has the capacity to accommodate at least 5,925 new housing units on vacant or underutilized land. Of these, 2,423 units can be accommodated in High Density Residential and Residential Mixed Use Designations. As the residential sites inventory (Appendix A) identifies the potential for 2,423 dwelling units within the High Density Residential and Residential Mixed Use designations, and the very low- and low-income RHNA totals only 1,997, there is ample opportunity for development of affordable housing that will meet the remaining RHNA allotment for the very low- and low-income groups (see Table 46). C IT Y OF L A K E ELS I NORE GENERAL PLAN 122 Chapter 6 CITY OFA LAKE C_?9LSIIYOKE �� DREA Table 46 Comparison of Sites Inventory and RHNA Income Available Available Available Specific Surplus Category RHNA R3 DU RMU DU CMU DU Plan DU Units' Very Low 1,997 1,598 825 426 and Low Moderate and Above 2,932 1,501 2,001 570 Moderate Total Units 4,929 996 1. Surplus units are dwelling units available beyond the required RHNA In 2012, Lake Elsinore completed zoning map amendments to provide consistency with the General Plan for all parcels designated Residential Mixed Use, Commercial Mixed Use, and High Density Residential. Identified Specific Plants have been adopted and development processes are ongoing. As such, all zoning is in place for identified sites. The City of Lake Elsinore has the availability of land to more than satisfy the 4,929 RHNA units identified for the 2014-2021 planning period. INLAND EMPIRE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS State housing element law utilizes a density to correlate affordability and income groups (RHNA) with zoning and residential capacity (sites inventory). To demonstrate densities to encourage the development of housing affordable to lower income households, the statute has always provided the ability to analyze the appropriate density. Recent amendments to the statute added a default density standard as an option to streamline the analysis requirements where the Department of Housing and Community Development must accept specific density standards. For jurisdictions with a population greater than 25,000, and located within a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) with a population of more than two million, the default density is 30 dwelling units per acre (or higher). Lake Elsinore has a population greater than 25,000 and is within the Riverside -San Bernardino MSA with over four million people. Thus, per State law, Lake Elsinore's default density is 30 dwelling units per acre. Density is a critical factor in the development of affordable housing. In theory, maintaining low densities typically increases the cost of construction and land per unit and increases the amount of subsidy needed to ensure affordability, while higher density development can lower per-unit land cost and facilitates construction in an economy of scale. The highest residential density permitted by the City's General Plan is 24 units per acre (see Table 32). Density bonuses allow C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 123 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE LSI 0P E DREAM Table 51 Resources Available for Housing Activities Program Description Eligible Activities Supportive Grants to improve quality of existing • Housing Rehabilitation Housing Grant shelters and transitional housing. Increase shelters and transitional housing facilities for the homeless. Section 8 Rental Rental assistance program which • Rental Assistance Assistance provides a subsidy to very low- income families, individuals, seniors and the disabled. Participants pay 30% of their adjusted income toward rent. Section 811/202 Grants to non-profit developers of • Acquisition supportive housing for the elderly • Rehabilitation and disabled persons. Section 811 can • New Construction be used to develop group homes, • Rental Assistance independent living, facilities, and • Support Services intermediate care facilities. Section 811 Grants to non-profit developers of • Acquisition supportive housing for person with • Rehabilitation disabilities, including group homes, • New Construction independent living facilities and • Rental Assistance intermediate care facilities. Shelter Plus Care Provides grants for rental assistance • Rental Assistance for permanent housing and case • Homeless Prevention management for homeless individuals with disabilities and their families. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL. PLAN 132 Chapter 6 CITY OF LAKE L2LSIIYOIZE �V DIUA� M EXI*REME Table 51 Resources Available for Housing Activities Program Description Eligible Activities Home Ownership HOPE program provides grants to • Homeownership Assistance for People low income people to achieve Everywhere homeownership. The three programs (HOPE) are: • Home Buyer Assistance HOPE 1 — Public Housing projects. The jurisdiction must pledge Homeownership Program HOPE It — Homeownership of Multi- family Units Program repayment. Maximum loan amount HOPE III — Homeownership for Single-family Homes Section 108 Loan Provides loan guarantee to CDBG • Acquisition entitlement jurisdictions for pursuing • Rehabilitation large capital improvement or other • Home Buyer Assistance projects. The jurisdiction must pledge • Homeless Assistance its future CDBG allocations for loan repayment. Maximum loan amount can be up to five times the entitlement jurisdiction's most recent approved annual allocation. Maximum loan term is twenty (20) years. Private Resources • Community Home Buyer Program • Homebuyer Assistance — Fixed rate Mortgages • Community Home Improvement • Homebuyer Assistance/Rehab Federal National Mortgage Program — Mortgages for Mortgage purchase and rehabilitation of a Association home (Fannie Mae) • Making Home Affordable— • Homeowner assistance to avoid Refinance and Loan Modification foreclosure services CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL. PLAN 133 Chapter 6 CITY OF �, LADE 'S LSIIYORE -� DREAM Table 51 Resources Available for Housing Activities Program Description Eligible Activities California Non-profit mortgage banking • New Construction Community consortium that pools resources to • Rehabilitation Reinvestment reduce lender risk in financing • Acquisition Corporation affordable housing. Provides long (CCRC) term debt financing for affordable multi -family rental housing. Federal Home Direct subsidies to non-profit and for- • New Construction Loan Bank profit developers, and public agencies • Expand Home Ownership for Lower Affordable for affordable low-income ownership Income Persons Housing Program and rental projects. Administrative Resources Primary responsibility for the implementation of the City's housing programs and activities lies with the City Manager and the Community Development Department, including the Planning and Building Divisions. The primary responsibilities of the Community Development Department include the overall implementation of the City's General Plan Goals and Policies through its programs such as the Zoning and the Subdivision Ordinances, as well as implementing Specific Plans. In addition, the Community Development Department is responsible for the long-range planning and physical development of the City. The department ensures the City's viability through enforcement of land use, construction, health, safety, and environmental regulations. C ITY OF LAKE EI-SINORE GENE RAL PLAN 1.34 CHAPTER 6 6,5 Housing Element Plan CITY OF LADE IC,?9LSIAC)RE The Housing Plan provides direction for City decision makers to achieve the long-term housing goals set forth in the Lake Elsinore Housing Element. The Plan is established to guide the development, revitalization and preservation of a balanced inventory of housing to meet the needs of present and future residents of the City. It is the overall goal of the City to ensure that all residents have decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing regardless of income. The specific goals, policies and programs detailed in this section provide the framework for the City's overall housing program. Specific policies and implementation programs included in this Housing Element are intended to provide a wide variety of tools to implement the City's General Plan goals. Actual programs will be implemented at the discretion of the City in order to meet established goals. As used here, a goal is a statement defining a desired end result; a policy is a plan of action to guide decisions and actions; and a program identifies the method, agencies, officials, funding sources, and time frame the City will undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals set forth in this Housing Element. Together, goals, policies, and programs establish the framework for making decisions that affect the availability of housing in Lake Elsinore. Consistent with State law, the Housing Element goals, policies, and programs aim to: • Conserve and improve the condition of the existing housing stock • Assist in the development of housing for low- and moderate -income households • Identify adequate sites to encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels • Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing • Promote equal opportunities for all persons CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE GENERAL PLAN 135 Chapter 6 Housing Goals, Policies, and Programs CITY OF ,,cam LADE LSIIYORE r �ry DREAM EXTREME Goal 1 Preservation, maintenance, and improvement of the existing housing stock to provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for the residents of Lake Elsinore. Policy 1.1 Continue to enforce building, land use, and property maintenance codes. Policy 1.2 Facilitate the removal or rehabilitation of housing units that pose serious health and safety hazards to residents and adjacent structures. Policy 1.3 Continue programs directed at preserving the physical quality of housing and neighborhood environments and maintaining compliance with established standards. Policy 1.4 Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of all new housing developments and the addition of energy conservation devices/practices in existing developments. PROGRAM 1: CODE ENFORCEMENT Enforce City codes to remedy unsightly or hazardous conditions in residential neighborhoods. Provide information and technical assistance to property owners regarding housing maintenance. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Divisions Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 2: REMOVAL OF SUBSTANDARD HOUSING Eliminate, through demolition, unsafe and dilapidated housing units that cannot be rehabilitated. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Divisions CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENE RAL PLAN [all Chapter 6 Funding Source: Department Budget, General Fund, CDBG PROGRAM 3: ABANDONED PROPERTIES CITY OF LAKE'LSINORE DREAM Enforce the City's Abandoned Residential Property Registration Program (Ordinance 1252), and encourage owners of houses and properties that become vacant and abandoned due to foreclosure to maintain or rehabilitate the properties. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Divisions Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 4: HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAMS CDBG Home Repair Program: Utilize CDBG or other funds, as available, to provide financial assistance for minor repairs of homes owned and occupied by lower-income residents. Eligible repairs include plumbing, electrical, painting, carpentry, roof repairs, and masonry work. Provide assistance to approximately 10-15 very low- and low-income households. In -Lieu Fee Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program: Institute a pilot housing rehabilitation program funded with in -lieu fees received, providing loans and/or grants up to $5,000 for exterior improvements. Provide assistance to approximately 10 very low- and low-income households. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: CDBG; City Affordable Housing Fund PROGRAM 5: ENERGY CONSERVATION Implement the Climate Action Plan (CAP) to reduce local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with State law. Carry out the housing related strategies and measures identified in the CAP to meet GHG emissions targets over the next two decades. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 137 GEN ERAL PLAN CITY OF _2 ^j Chapter 6 LAKE LSI1i0P,E -� DREAM Goal The provision of affordable housing to accommodate the local housing needs. Policy 2.1 Preserve and expand the City's supply of affordable (low- and/or moderate- income) rental and ownership housing for lower- income households. Policy 2.2 Use incentives and regulatory concessions to promote the development of housing for lower-income persons and those with special needs including, but not limited to, large families, persons with physical or developmental disabilities, families with children, the elderly, and the homeless. Policy 2.3 Encourage partnerships to maximize resources available for the provision of affordable housing. Policy 2.4 Actively pursue federal and state housing program funds to provide housing assistance and to support the development of housing affordable to lower- income households. Policy 2.5 Discourage the conversion of existing apartment units to condominiums where such conversion will diminish the supply of very low, low- and moderate - income housing. Policy 2.6 Promote coordination and cooperation between the City, developers, and neighborhood residents early and throughout the process for affordable housing developments. PROGRAM 6: DENSITY BONUS Encourage the use of the Density Bonus Ordinance to obtain higher densities in residential developments and increase the availability of affordable housing units in exchange for exceptional architecture and amenities. A copy of the Density Bonus Ordinance shall be attached to Residential Design Review Applications. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget CITY OF LAKE E L.SIN0RF. 138 GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 PROGRAM 7: AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITES CITY OF LAKE?LSIIYOR_ �M DREA Make available on the City website and distribute to interested developers a list of City -owned property suitable for affordable housing projects and the Housing Element which includes a Residential Sites Inventory and Site Suitability Analysis. Update the City -owned property list annually. Provide Habitat for Humanity — inland Valley with information on residential sites suitable for affordable housing development. Timeframe: Upon Housing Element Adoption and Certification; Annually Responsible Agency: Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 8: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS Work with agencies and organizations to increase affordable housing activities such as construction, rehabilitation, or financial assistance to renters and owners. Provide a link to available housing programs for residents and developers on the City website. Partnerships and programs to continue and/or pursue include but are not limited to: County of Riverside Housing Authority (City/County Mortgage Revenue Bonds), County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (First Time Home Buyer and Mortgage Certificate Program), California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), Habitat for Humanity. Endeavor to facilitate at least one affordable housing project during the planning period. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 9: RENTAL ASSISTANCE Continue to support the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Direct eligible households to the Section 8 rental assistance program managed by the Housing Authority of Riverside County. Provide information to landlords regarding participation in the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget C IT OF LAKE ELS I NO RF. G ENE RAL. PLAN 099J Chapter 6 PROGRAM 10: SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS CITY OFA� LADE LSIIYORE . DREAf ME�CTREME Encourage non-profit organizations to pursue funding for the construction of elderly, disabled, or other special needs housing. Provide referrals to programs such as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program and the California Department of Mental Health/CaIHFA Mental Health Services Act (MRSA) Housing Program. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 11: HOMELESS NEED Consistent with available funding, address the needs of at -risk and homeless individuals and families through assistance to non -profits serving the homeless population. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department Funding Source: CDBG Goal 3 Adequate sites to accommodate the City's housing need. Policy 3.1 Use the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, other land use and development plans, and the development process to provide housing sites that meet the identified local need. Policy 3.2 Promote a balance of housing types, including mixed-use development, to meet the needs of the community. Policy 3.3 Maintain an inventory of vacant and underutilized land and make available to the development community. Policy 3.4 Promote the provision of housing for special needs households. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 140 Chapter 6 PROGRAM 12: CONSISTENCY ZONING CITY OF LAKE CpLSINORE DRUAM EXTREME Continue with subsequent phases of the Consistency Zoning Project to bring zoning consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations, in accordance with the Compatibility Matrix shown in Appendix B of the General Plan. As part of Zoning Code amendments, incorporate a matrix of permitted uses in residential zones into Title 1.7 - Zoning of the Municipal Code to facilitate understanding of allowed uses. Titneframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Community Development Department - Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 13: SPECIFIC PLANS Promote development within existing and future specific plans to produce planned community environments with a variety of housing types and densities. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department; Community Development Department - Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 14: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS Work toward the incorporation of a wide range of housing types (including special needs housing), densities, and affordability levels during the negotiation or renegotiation of development agreements with residential developers. Encourage developers to construct a percentage of affordable housing concurrently with market rate housing in each phase of development. During the Development Agreement process, facilitate and incentivize, as feasible, the development of housing projects on small sites, lot consolidation of adjacent small sites, and development of large parcels sizes that facilitate multi -family developments affordable to lower income households. Timeframe: 2014-2021 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department; Community Development Department - Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN 141 Chapter 6 CITY Or �� LADE fo:�-2LSII`iOKE V DREAM Goal 4 Remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. Policy 4.1 Periodically review residential development standards and regulations, ordinances, processing procedures, and fees to identify and mitigate constraints that may impede the development, improvement, and conservation of housing. Policy 4.2 Provide avenues for the development of housing for extremely low-income and special needs persons. PROGRAM 15: SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING Support the housing needs of special needs households by prioritizing projects that include special needs housing or housing for extremely/very low-income households and by referring residents to the Inland Regional Center for housing and services available for persons with developmental disabilities. Review the Zoning Code to ensure compliance with Government Code Section 65583(a)(5) relating to transitional and supportive housing as a residential use of property, subject to only those restrictions applicable to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Timeframe: 2014-2021; Review Zoning Code for ongoing consistency with GC Section 65583(a)(5) within 4 years of Housing Element adoption. Process necessary revisions. Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget Goal 5 Equal access to housing for all residents. Policy 5.1 Continue to enforce fair housing laws prohibiting discrimination in the building, financing, selling, or renting of housing on the basis of race, ethnicity, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor. CITY OF LAKE ELS INORE 142 GENERAL PLAN Chapter 6 PROGRAM 16: FAIR HOUSING CITY OF LADE 0LSIIYOI ,E � DREA Work towards ensuring fair housing choices for all residents by advertising resident rights under federal and State fair housing laws and providing access to local fair housing service providers. Make this information available on the City website. Amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code to revise or remove the definition of family to be flexible for a variety of household types, consistent with State and federal laws. Timeframe: 2014-2021; Review the definition of "family" to ensure consistency with State and federal laws within 4 years of Housing Element adoption. Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget PROGRAM 17: REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION Adopt a process to address requests for reasonable accommodation, and develop procedures regulating siting, funding, development and use of housing for people with disabilities. Timeframe: 2014 Responsible Agency: Administrative Services Department, Community Development Department — Planning Division Funding Source: Department Budget Quantified Objectives by Income Group Table 52 summarizes the City's quantified objectives for the 2014-2021 planning period by income group. The objectives include: • Construction of 4,929 new housing units, representing the City's RHNA of 1,196 units for extremely/very tow -income households, 801 units for low-income households, 897 units for moderate -income households, and 2,035 units for above moderate income households. • Rehabilitation of 1.0-15 units through the CDBG Home Repair Program • Rehabilitation of 10 units through the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN [Ex] CITY OF �� Chapter 6 LADE C?LSII`IOiZE REAM EXM�FME Table 52 Summary of 2014-2021 Quantified Objectives Income Level Extremely Very Above Low Low Low Moderate Moderate Total Construction Objective (RHNA) 598 598 801 897 2,035 4,929 CDBG Home Repair 10-15 10-15 In -Lieu Housing Rehab Loan Program 10 10 Note: Pursuant to AB 2634, local jurisdictions are also required to project the housing needs of extremely low income households (0-30% AMI). In estimating the number of extremely low income households, a jurisdiction can use 50% of the very low income allocation or apportion the very low income figure based on Census data. C I T Y O P L A K E E L S I N O R E G E N E R A L P L A N 144 CITY OF Chapter 6 LAKE L2LSIfiC)RE ,-V DREAM 6.6 Review of Past (2008-2014) Accomplishments State law (California Government Code Section 65588[a]) requires jurisdictions to review their housing elements to evaluate: • The appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in contributing to the attainment of the state housing goal; • The effectiveness of the housing element in attainment of the community's housing goals and objectives; and • The progress in implementation of the housing element. The evaluation helps a jurisdiction identify the extent to which adopted programs have been successful in achieving stated objectives and addressing local needs, and how such programs continue to be relevant in addressing current and future housing needs. The evaluation provides the basis for recommended modifications to policies and programs in the updated element, and provides meaningful guidance for establishing new objectives. Table 53 shows the progress the City made toward implementing the 2008-2014 Housing Element programs. Based on this information, an analysis of the effectiveness and continued appropriateness of these programs is provided, and the goals, policies, and programs of this Housing Element have been updated to reflect this evaluation. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL, PLAN 145 Chapter 6 This page intentionally left blank. C ll'Y OF LADE fLSINOBJE DKEA C I TY O F L A K E E t. $ I N O R E G E N E RA L taro P L A N A A O a +-• o •� Aro N �' Gni.' LC' � � y o0ai �, U •... u vm z C7 o �', � y X 0.�� A W y F oG O v O N s. 7� v U u N Ou � wf'�i cn W sem. O P» ici >'• 'b O rv, ti� v u tri v O! N N O i6 A > ^r =�14 0 ° 0 o o ao o N o. 0 � v o v � 0 75 03 F u voz o a r 2 ,�y v N A 08 aQ U A U ' 21, � u •x O� '� W v �, � G y" O S A U N y N A N Y Vii N� y roO �� '03 gyp+ ti 0 G y O N 0 0 HQQvQQ 0 0 O ° >U".°c�0 � YUvvU ° X G u P, d N �+ � O .�.• V Q H N G Q" o v > Ulu G W O r 0 c, w m° v � w V0 A y v C H n U Q CE 0 P o; A :A P. R y'Ei u St w .Y R O N O w V d �+ N O y�! W�: .0 C G .O ;4. xz b9 w wb0 .U. b� H z 75G N N sem. ,k V 'vi O v v G W v C O X v '-�" t p Ri v o � � � � � �. U by 0 w bo U A U o v 'y bOp v 00 CA G rr o W o v v aHi •° b v o p v °b0 N W m ° v o O aT v v v 0.0 a bA b0 G p m' w v zs C-C� v G v o v G r N v bq W m z> Q b w P. R P4 O z M Lr, W .di H a W O U Vol P. a gt tS W = 'Its ;4. 't OIt0 a.. " ti U `ti x +� •Z .y O fy h W ti •r O .�'�. C c; U A C ❑p N � � O • 'o m�Q am'a u 6 on, w o in v w o. Q n o U o N mN O v> G O O ro n G v�x�vv �sv s m O G N O Q O G A. O O N N O. }" m � m .4; p O � m P. a M v IM R 42 x A A G C O O N N CC U O 00 O " •= y v 'O Y ,n w ni N C4 ... ..�, b0 .O0 p p .G p p �' u u p OEs y w h°'u� v ani •o ..CpG of N 4 v v w p .4 FSC] > o ox`n ,n Ou O O c, M v o -p 7j U N v N U m r � b0 m .a O u m -O G p y v O 'r q 3 y b0n p o > 7 'z v o O u > > v o � " v o, 0 o v G in W v v O N U o a R LIP P. A b0 '� C CO x b0 ,S b0 U r .r O0 N ti b0 Q W t� ��p11 V V rC Q" W ix+ VI ix+ rbtr O H N t4 -p 'O 00 R > o O U O m p p 'O C O N bbo .0 R a O „O 75 S bb u a° v v SFO o 4 r C] 3 CL v A 'Gbn v o Ts 'Cl 'LS O r. O O '� O oo m H 3 � > H H V] �•�i 75 v o v R N 'y � O m ,0 m ° v R p ai WD o v°° A.� rRr .a b0 ::^ AR yG, Ov a O X O }�}..�� W O L1.m N °c @ v F z Q@ f 3 v R�� w w" R ob �� sa R i1r N Ul G � U Nri N d �i Q d N L� P. A Mil A -C2 bo b4D "tt 0 v d 2 v y v b0 d Ca v O H ox o a v n^<n o tt st �+ y st bo�c U 'ti d x O S "+ � .� k � 3'.• � N A v N � � C� � � O �+ ?' y Op m z •'�� � � '� fy •r '� Q y'. N !-� N W v� � .`�. U N f� � W m v °° °° v� ental U ° a o v o v a v o x v a oA ° Q ° o v d v v ,c� m � o 2:' �Lr)cl �v a o o C7 be �' o v o 0 •o o� o v o�Q� v v v v2;l MU b � m 'J 42 '� b0 .c; O v O P, 00v ;� v m v O v R. �] G> w p L1+ O p-2 U a° `orf+ v v'Ci G .0 o r. o OD OA >' O m v b O 'O v O .v - '.O •C V m °p, u Z a v �mw0.�. a mxcn o A VA 2 � f \��� }S ±/y] ƒ97: Z o }§°4 b 0 bo l) u `u B \0 Z \ a M W" N O U O p U y� y u O•S1-. O o a v O 'y '� •`i A O P � ice+ O y v� � S S � C O ."+ :�:. p X '� 'CS � 4U•` '� � � 'G � v � v � z u S +O. W pp NP A• d O S P d p � � � Z � '� � '^"' u vi � O m •� .� ti � Cri N o bD a u a 1 C� n } o G ,biD U u G U G 3 U on v -cs •� u -� W�� -d R. w 51 c'a v w v b,) Q bo N H O A bbo O 'o o G vl O X+ N U -1 O IX Ol � � v d %O, or 0 N -- ! dto CL z o 'p m .a S A � a„+ y ti •� O X Vl j U C GO 0 ° N •' N F� � �O •O N N 12 O M V 'O O �j 4 3 v 5 v N N rN O bc O a w bO0 N �O bZ O O Nps o w to tz 0 m O m LO 2 A A O. '� •p °' OA ;t j' y F N O z O ND P �Gd O O +N.. .� .G "rSr' 3 N UC N 0 N US v v O O P a v x> n 0v A o P. ¢" > .0 n vOi v r �r O N v v O" U '� k Q F v c 0 0 o�� c_ V t10"O rr .q O O, 'O ON N O v o 3 U '" > x v x " v v m o v "Om v ^, u v P. m .0 '+� P, (n m P] bbl) O G OO Pb0 00 U P. to O Q" P y .0 Q O O NO D-0 bq N N PQ '�J a .° o pbl y cf' P. v C) u .. v�v b O U N Ki u u D .� .� v A i. OP. N v m " Com!) O O00 v ee v o U):zx C� m (% m O x M x A 4;(3) IN � x � 'C ti W � v •+xi � �i W .O x � ' y U° ,oN, ��" � •y � " P �" � o d y di y ti ~O P � dr M y •U .`nr. v O bry N .f_ N •� 4 U j ,uC v O ,� b0 U) c» '� � � bq � � � �yy •y r+ U G � C'r N �-' U .moi Q (4 .A yj O Q "• u v m O A. 2:1 w w P. vv A, �rD GrO F �D m '" 5 q cno U U m .4 ° o bn •� °1 u m .' bn ^o °' v b0 OJ bO bjD vi N �+ O 04 0A H v .a Ul w m u m m O P, ci x / � & IN ) j Z \ � \ 0 / Ln A N lz X w'. LAW A t �v I N u lr V) At, +x+ V bp v m bo H �"• 'O A X (0 N v O O Q H N o m o o v H v 3 GG N u o m u tv 0 v 3 u G ..O O v 0 R, • .v O P, .N O m d � � W>" .a+ u `cl O R Oq A m v 2 A u N N N C1 Y d N N N CL .to G Y In In p y In v In In Inx by N � N t—i Op N by N n Op N lr O ,°i W � G N O v � � � .ti � � •iY sem. O > i 3 O N tc . N N P. v N id G N O�r•. bo a i+i G r� v .a w c Jam' NN ° a� a v O v v CL O N w O 75 u u O O W O p G u C O O y m 0 C v G O 0 OH V o '� v o° .bo v> Ca v E > v v a> tp tu. z Q N w G .G 0 p u O O o 0tc In - m .� w �0i cO 0 3 0 x v o. ° C w0 U Q 3° o °� ° n Id O a a a im¢ v on U > v o In v 0' o a v ° G° A .N > 0. v Ux ao ° G oUQ In wvU w 0 N w o a U `e G en W. = a*+i o > i 0 x G �Ox 0. � t bt max" onQ.� c mx QO ;�o:IV.U— �d W" L bo M y d 1 d H y 1'y s o ° z u .r +• d v U C maw a..� °w v y O EY Z N u N N a tt y v� •ti :r � U N R iZ � � x CO b9 N p N ° m v U •ro m H .� p b � u m bD .� 04bo U vi O N 0.C E U v U bq v 3 m m 0 °H 3 ° b y p a a o 3 0 w v U �r a w G ,� .� 'd U a m N42 'N x+ b00 O U H [n ��b9��o•� ���v� o v M G e o H p m o a. P.. O H -0 by v G v UG G °' C i' v b4 0 "HG H N `d A EI (C P» O SCO G N G w uG F `n H N � O o U w G p ,.G� V O U m w w W O. .G9 O.T. [-� .� ,� •� O bA 0 w a L Al It o z! N O O N N th � N r O � •V V � N }C�y. � W N L C �y N .O^ O ZZ! C tl O C N N y }� zza v o A.4 v> �° u o v a •� � ' •�; D. v v u 0 b0 o.p G a x °uu sxx 0 0 0 W Nn m y o N � GU �pp� v RU v p v v a � d � v O 2 pu G N O 0 bO 0 0 P, Ou 'a cu. il. IZ5 U m x on G i o v z N- 0 0 0 a. ;� o •;, G It A A C o v z.G o++ CL v .ti r W G to Go u 60 to bo to v r o v TI .z o oma,z o �44� U �C � O O N G� � .+ U N G +O. •� U N G � � U ° Oy N G 3 y °C• 50�•,ran o 'O,.p 0 M U S1, y v O N m is U v .4 °u o v •- o P-. p. °' .-`�� y bD 'O m v r> °u P. O Q...o c0 .�' bp9 Z5 •m �n v � `� t. � o o ° G v vVj .o N ti O C m 5 W O pq LL v .J '.0 ~ aJ b w N v G W GO 4 S O O L G ebo 0 A A a Q W z w x (� o 00 tod � W w w O H V CHAPTER 6 CITY OF LADE �LSII` 0R E "REQ DREA Table 54 summarizes the quantified objectives contained in the City's 2008-2014 Housing Element, and compares the City's progress in fulfilling these objectives. Table 54 Summary of 2008-2014 Quantified Objectives and Progress Income Level ExtremelyNery Low Low Above Moderate Moderate Total Construction Objectives (Remaining RHNA) Goal 1,200 921 2,121 Progress 111 2,932 3,043 Rehabilitation Objectives Goal 20 1.0 5 35 Progress Preservation/Assistance Objectives Goal 46 104 2 152 Progress 46 104 2 152 Source: City of Lake Elsinore, 2012 Based on a review of Building Department records of permits issued between January 2006 and July 201.2, the City fulfilled and surpassed its total quantified objective for new housing construction. The City did fall short of the objective for extremely/very low and low-income units. The shortfall in production relative to the stated objective is not unexpected knowing that the high cost of development requires extremely/very low income affordable housing projects to seek significant subsidies or development incentives. However, given land prices in Lake Elsinore, many market rate housing units are available at affordable costs. The rehabilitation objective for the Senior Home Repair Program (nun by the County of Riverside) was 15 units. From 2008 to 2012, no grants were awarded. The City is seeking to create a local Senior Home Repair Program in order to increase its rehabilitation activities. CITY OF LAKE ELSINOPE GENERAL PLAN 169 Chapter 6 CITY OF \ LADE LSIHOIZE --` DREAM For the previous planning period, the only identified units at risk of conversion to market -rate units were the 152 units at the Lakeview Apartments. The Lakeview Apartments (Phase I and II) and the Redevelopment Agency renegotiated affordability terms to rehabilitate 150 affordable housing units within the project and renew the contract to retain units as affordable housing. The affordable housing income restrictions will be in place for a minimum of 55 years. C IT Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E 170 GENERAL PLAN Appendix A CITY OF LADE9 LSII`IOIZE -IIS!? D2bA Appendix A Parcel -Specific Sites Inventory CITY OF LAKE E I. S NORE GENERAL PLAN A-1 Appendix A C IT Y OF This page intentionally left blank. L A K E E L S I N O R E A-2 CITY 0[ LADE QpLSIiYORE �-V DREAM GEN ERAL PLAN Appendix A Lake Elsinore Hills- Focus Area 1 CITY oI LADE'S LSIIYOK R.LA APN GP Designation Density Zoning Current Use Acres Capacity 377340001 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 9.42 59 377340002 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 9.51 59 377340003 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 9.56 60 377340004 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 7.66 48 377340005 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 3.71 23 377340007 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 10.15 63 377340015 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 5.38 34 377340014 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 4.9 31 377340019 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 2.63 1.6 377340018 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 5.53 35 377340011 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 11.71 73 377340010 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 10.25 64 377340020 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU SFR 1.96 12 377340021 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 2.38 15 377330005 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 5.84 37 377330006 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6.68 42 363090001 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 9.98 62 363090002 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 10.18 64 363090003 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 10.31 64 363090011 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 9.59 60 377340009 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.36 2 Total 923 C IT Y OF L A K E E LS I NORE GENERAL PLAN A-3 CITY OE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL r:IWl P I. A N CITY OIIAI Appendix A LADE j5:LSII`i01ZE DREAME�(raEME Lake View- Focus Area 2 Current Consolidation ID A APN GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Capacity Potential 1 379315033 Residential Mixed Use Up to 35 du/ac RMU Vacant 4.96 95 Yes 95 units 2 379090012 Residential Mixed Use Up to 35 du/ac RMU Vacant 1.26 24 3 379090013 Residential Mixed Use Up to 35 du/ac RMU Vacant 1.29 25 Yes 4 379090023 Residential Mixed Use Up to 35 du/ac RMU Vacant 2.48 48 255 units 5 379090022 Residential Mixed Use Up to 35 du/ac RMU Vacant 8.25 158 Total 18.24 350 CITY OE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL r:IWl P I. A N Appendix A ID# APN GP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 379160004 High Density Residential 379131019 High Density Residential 379131006 High Density Residential 379131005 High Density Residential 379131015 High Density Residential 379207006 Commercial Mixed Use 379207004 Commercial Mixed Use 379180001 Commercial Mixed Use 379180002 Commercial Mixed Use 379180003 Commercial Mixed Use 379180005 Commercial Mixed Use 379120001 Commercial Mixed Use 379120012 Commercial Mixed Use Total Lake View- Focus Area 3 CITY Of LADE 'S LSINORE D KF.A Current Use Acres Ca Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant unaen¢wzea 6-18 du/ac CMU Commercial 5 3.86 0.2 0.2 0.36 2.59 3.93 8.64 9.06 5.91 3.45 6.35 1.22 a 442 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-5 Consolidation ty Potential 96 Yes 96 units 74 4 Yes 4 89 units 7 16 25 54 57 37 22 40 a 442 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-5 Appendix A Lake View- Focus Area 4 CITY OFAA LAKE �LSINOKE -�� DREAD M fi�(TREME CITY OF LAKE E I.. S I N O R fi A-6 GENERAL PLAN Consoli- dation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Current Use Acres Capacity Potential 1 379060027 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 4.36 84 2 379060022 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 13.71 263 3 379060005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 3.44 66 4 379060026 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.5 10 5 379060007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized 1.92 37 6 379060008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized 0.9 17 7 379060017 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.88 17 8 379060024 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.45 9 9 379060025 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.28 5 Yes 10 379060010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vaunt 1.25 24 561 units 11 379060016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.28 5 12 379060015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.22 4 13 379060014 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.3 6 14 379060020 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.15 3 15 379060021 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.14 3 16 379060012 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.29 6 17 379060011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.13 2 18 381040005 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 1.25 8 19 381040006 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Underutilized SF 1.48 9 20 381050001 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 14.25 89 Underutilized 21 381050002 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Commercial 15.4 96 22 381320023 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 4.65 29 23 381040026 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.31 2 24 381040008 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Underutilized SF 1.77 11 25 381320020 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 7.91 49 Total 67 855 CITY OF LAKE E I.. S I N O R fi A-6 GENERAL PLAN Appendix A CITY OF LAKE LSI1.10RE Riverview - Focus Area 5 Current ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Consolidation Potential 1 373071002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.8 15 Yes 2 373071018 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 9.05 174 189 units Total 9.85 189 C IT Y OF L A K E ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-7 Appendix A CITY OF LADE LSIIYOIZE DREAM Historic District -Focus Area 6 Current Consolidation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Capacity Potential 1 377231040 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 1.03 20 2 377231028 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.22 4 3 377231009 High. Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.13 2 4 377231010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant. 0.15 3 5 377231011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.14 3 Yes 6 377231024 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.21 4 51 units 7 3772310E High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.13 2 8 377231037 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.14 3 9 377231023 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 10 377231038 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant. 0.13 2 11 377231039 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 12 377231015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.21 4 13 377231016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 SFR 0.19 4 14 377231017 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 SFR 0.19 4 Yes 15 3772310/8 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.19 4 24 writs 16 377231019 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.19 4 17 377231021 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.09 2 18 377231020 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.10 2 19 374052010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 SFR 0.20 4 20 374052011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.21 4 22 374061001 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 23 374061002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.21 4 26 374061019 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.18 3 28 374061021 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 29 374061006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 SFR 0.21 4 30 374061007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 SFR 0.21 4 C IT Y OF L A K E E L S I N O R E A-8 GENERAL. PLAN Appendix A Historic District- Focus Area 6 CITY LADES LSI110RE - V DREAM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-9 Current Consolidation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Capacity Potential 31 374061014 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 32 874061015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.19 4 33 374061029 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.20 4 34 374061028 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.19 4 35 377281003 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RNIU Vacant 0.16 3 36 377281004 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 37 377281005 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RIVIU Vacant 0.17 3 38 377281006 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 39 377281007 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 ized 40 374062024 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Con-anerc 1.66 32 41 374063005 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.29 6 42 374062016 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.36 7 43 374062004 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.01 0 44 374062020 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.51 10 45 374062005 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 46 374062006 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 47 374062015 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.56 11 48 374063013 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.21 4 49 374063014 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.21 4 50 374063015 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.21 4 51 374063016 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.21 4 52 374063017 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.21 4 53 374062018 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.62 4 Total 1245 231 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-9 Appendix A IDh APN GP Historic District- Focus Area 7 Current Use CITY O£ ng*^ M, LAhE LSITIORE DREAM E/PI'REME Con- solidation Acres Capacity Potential 1 377320004 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R3 Vacant 1.20 23 26 2 377320003 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Underutilized SFR 2.33 45 377271005 3 377320008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized SFR 1.31 u Yes 4 377320007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized SFR 0.57 11 108 units 5 377320001 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized SPR 0.19 4 R-3 6 377272015 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 Vacant 7 377272016 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R3 Vacant 0.17 3 0.16 8 377272017 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.15 3 3 9 377272018 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 35 10 377273003 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.34 7 373025009 11 377273011 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R3 Vacant 0.14 3 Residential Mixed Use 12 377273012 High Density Residential Max24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.18 3 Yes 13 377273016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.17 3 19 units 14 377273015 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 017 3 15 377282002 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 16 377282003 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.17 3 17 377291009 Residential Mixed Use Max 24du/ac RMU Vacant 0.40 8 18 377291010 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.41 8 19 377291011 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 20 377292017 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.21 4 21 377292018 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R3 Vacant 0.29 6 22 377292019 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.08 2 23 373025004 Residential Mixed Use Max 24du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 24 373025005 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 25 377244007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.33 6 26 377244006 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 27 377271005 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 28 377271006 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.15 3 29 377244003 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 30 377244004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R-3 Underutilized SFR 0.17 3 31 377271003 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 32 377271002 High Density Residential Max 24du/ac R-3 Vacant 0.16 3 33 373025028 Residential Mixed Use Max 24du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 34 373025027 Residential Mixed Use Max24du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 35 373025007 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 Yes 36 373025009 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vaunt 0.17 3 19 units 37 373025008 Residential Mixed Use Max 24du/ac RMU Vacant 0.34 7 Total 11.93 229 C IT Y OF L A K E E L S I N O R E G E N E R A L P L A N NVU, Appendix A ID 9 APN CITY OI LADE 2LSIBOKE V DREAM Historic District- Focus Area 8 Current GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Con- solidation Capacity Potential 1 373145003 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 Yes 2 373145004 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 4.44 85 87units 3 373153036 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.24 5 Residential Mixed Use 4 373153002 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.23 4 Max 24 du/ac 5 373153001 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.88 17 RMU 6 373153016 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.20 4 Vacant 7 373153017 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.51 10 Yes 8 373153018 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 54 units 9 373153019 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 23 10 373153023 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.28 5 374263002 11 373153020 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 Commercial Miffed Use 12 373153021 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 6-18 du/ac 13 373154029 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 14 373154028 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.17 3 15 373154030 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 16 373154003 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 17 373154025 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 Yes 18 373154020 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.15 3 29 units 19 373154024 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 20 373154021 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.16 3 21 373154022 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.15 3 22 373154023 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.24 5 23 374263001 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.73 9 24 374263002 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.72 9 25 374263006 Commercial Miffed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.26 3 26 374263005 Commercial Mixed Use 6-18 du/ac CMU Vacant 0.15 2 C I T Y Total OF LAKE ELSINORE A-11 10.77 19339 G E N E RA L P L A N Appendix A Business District- Focus Area 9 CITY OF LAKE LSI11OIZE DREAM Con- solidation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Current Us Acres Capacity Potential 1 374021004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.22 4 2 374021029 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 3 3740220// High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 4 374022007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.43 8 5 37402019 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 6 374022022 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 Yes 7 374022023 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 28 units 8 374022024 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 9 374022025 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 10 374023005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.13 2 11 374023008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.34 7 12 374024001 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.22 4 13 374024002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 14 374024003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.06 1 15 374024004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.13 2 16 374024005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 17 374024006 I-tigh Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 18 374024007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 19 374024008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 1.72 33 20 374024009 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.13 2 Yes 21 374024010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 69 units 22 374024011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 23 374024012 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.13 2 24 374024013 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.23 4 25 374024014 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.06 1 26 374024015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.06 1 27 374024016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.06 1 28 374024017 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 C IT Y O F L A K E E L S t N O R E A-12 GENE RAL P LAN Appendix A Pusiness District- Focus Area 9 CITY OF LAKE C-92 OIZE 'IPP DREAM CITY OF LAKE EL.SINORE GE NERAL PLAIN F.Mal Con- solidation ID 4 APN CP Designation Density Zoning Current Us Acres Capacity Potential 29 374025001 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.10 2 30 374025002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 31 374025003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 32 374025004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 33 374025005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 34 374025006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 Yes 35 374025007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 31 units 36 374025008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 37 374025009 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.13 2 38 374025010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.12 2 39 374025011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.14 3 40 374025012 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.15 3 41 374025013 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.15 3 42 374031001 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 43 3740131002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 44 374031003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 45 374031004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 46 374031005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 47 374031006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 48 374031007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 021 4 49 374031008 High Density Residential Max 24 dulac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 50 374031009 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 51 374031010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.11 2 52 374031011 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 53 374031012 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.10 2 Yes 54 374031013 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.10 2 78 emits 55 374031014 Pugh Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vaczult 0.20 4 56 374031015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 57 374031016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.10 2 58 374031017 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.09 2 59 374031018 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 60 374031019 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 61 374031020 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 020 4 62 374031023 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 63 374031024 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac K3 Vacant 0.20 4 64 374031025 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 65 374031026 High Density Resictential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.17 3 66 374031027 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac K3 Vacant 0.20 4 CITY OF LAKE EL.SINORE GE NERAL PLAIN F.Mal Appendix A CITY OF � A LADELSIIYOIZE DREAM 85 374041002 Business District- Focus Area 9 Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 86 374041003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vaunt Con- 4 87 374041008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 solidation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Current Us Acres 0.20 Capacity Potential 67 374032001 High Density Residential Mac 24 chi/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 374041010 68 374032002 High Density Residential Mac 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 69 374032003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 Yes 70 374032004 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.22 4 24 units 71 374032005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 Vacant 72 374032006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.22 4 0.29 74 374032017 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 4 75 374032018 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 96 76 374032019 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 374042006 77 374033004 High Density Residential Nlax 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.2 4 High Density Residential 78 374033005 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac 123 Vacant 0.21 4 Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 101 374051007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac Yes 79 374033006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 18.54 356 20 omits 80 374033007 High Density Residential Nlax 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 81 374033012 High Density Residential Mac 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 82 374033009 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vaunt 0.21 4 83 374033026 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 85 374041002 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 86 374041003 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vaunt 0.20 4 87 374041008 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 88 374041009 High Density Residential Mac 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 Yes 89 374041010 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 39 units 90 374041026 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 91 374041027 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.29 6 92 374041028 High Density Residentiat Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.21 4 93 374041029 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.29 6 94 374041015 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 95 374041016 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 96 374041030 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 97 374042006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.19 4 98 374042007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0'21 4 100 374051006 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 101 374051007 High Density Residential Max 24 du/ac R3 Vacant 0.20 4 Total 18.54 356 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-14 Appendix A CITY OF LAKE L2LSIli0RE DMA ID # APN Business District- Focus Area 10 Current GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Capacity Con - solidation Potential 26 373082005 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 27 373082006 Residential Mixed Use Max 24clu/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 28 373082007 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 29 373082008 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 30 373082009 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 31 373082010 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RIvIU Vacant 0.11. 2 32 373082011 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 33 373082012 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 34 373082013 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 35 373082014 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 36 373082015 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 37 373082017 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.15 3 38 373082018 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 39 373082019 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 40 373082020 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 41 373082021 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.07 1 42 373082022 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.07 1 43 373082023 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.7.2 2 44 373082024 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 45 373082025 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 46 373082026 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 47 373082027 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 Yes 48 373082028 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 101 units 49 373082036 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 CITY OF LAKE E LS I NORE GENERAL PLAN A-15 Appendix A Business District- Focus Area 10 CITY OF LADE LSINORE DREAM 70 373082031 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 71 373082032 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 Con - Total 5.45 105 Current solidation ID # APN GP Designation Density Zoning Use Acres Capacity Potential 50 373082037 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 51 373082038 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 52 373082039 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 53 373082040 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 54 373082041 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 55 373082042 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 56 373082043 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.14 3 57 373082044 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 58 373082046 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.13 2 59 373082047 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 60 373082048 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 61 373082049 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 62 373082050 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.12 2 63 373082051 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 64 373082052 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 65 373082053 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac R1\/1U Vacant 0.10 2 66 373082054 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 67 373082055 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 68 373082056 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 69 373082057 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 70 373082031 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.11 2 71 373082032 Residential Mixed Use Max 24 du/ac RMU Vacant 0.10 2 Total 5.45 105 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN A-16 C IT Y OF L A K E E LSI NOR E GENERAL PLAN A-17 CITY OF Appendix A LADE j5LSIl 0R_E -�i5VO DREAM The Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan - Brighton VTTM 35001 The AHR Riverside Specific Plan Land Current Brighton SP Density Acres Capacity* County APN Use Use ID PAI 390130028 Suburban Village Max 30 du/ac Vacant 9.8 40 390130026 PA2 390160006 SFR II 6 du/ac Vacant 161.2 534 390190017 390190014 390160003 390190015 PA3 390190014 Suburban Village Max 30 du/ac 389020062 390190018 Vacant 34.6 80 389020064 390190015 71 SFR II 6 du/ac Vacant 18.7 PA4 390200008 390200010 PA5 389080055 HD MFR Max 30 du/ac Vacant 11.5 225 389080056 PAS 390130028 5 du/ac Vacant 164.5 451 SFR I 390160006 390200008 390210021 390200010 390190015 Total 400 1,401 *Capacity limit is preset per Planning Area per the Specific Plan C IT Y OF L A K E E LSI NOR E GENERAL PLAN A-17 CITY ON � Appendix A LAKE 29BINORE DREAM The Diamond Specific Plan The Riverside Specific Diamond County Plan SP ID APN Land Use Density Current Use Acres Capacity* 0.55 363161031 373210014 0.44 373210016 Mixed 0.20 0.55 373210019 363161033 0.37 Max 24 du/ac Vacant 373210020 Mixed Underutilized 0.85 Use 373210021 Use Max 24 du/ac Commercial 2.99 50 363161034 373210023 0.37 373210024 0.06 0.49 373210026 373210037 1.63 PA 1 373210027 0.60 C [TY OF LAKE ELSINORE G ENE RAL PLANT A-18 363150006 0.38 363161029 0.55 363161030 0.55 363161031 0.55 363161032 Mixed 0.55 363161033 Max 24 du/ac Vacant 0.60 275 Use 363161034 0.19 363161035 0.49 373210037 2.71 373210038 8.74 373210039 5.79 PA2 373210043 1.52 363161012 0.24 363161037 Mixed Max 24 du/ac Vacant 0.46 50 365280022 Use 7.31 PA 5 373210041 3.82 Mixed PA 6 371030035 Use Max 24 du/ac Vacant 225 11.70 Total 58.00 600 *Capacity limit is preset per Planning Area per the Specific Plan C [TY OF LAKE ELSINORE G ENE RAL PLANT A-18 Appendix B Appendix B CITY OF LAKE �LSINORE � DREAM Letter from Bridge Housing Corporation CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL I:Ml PLAN CITY or � Appendix B LADE LSINORE DREAM City of Lake Elsinore Oraft Housing Element November 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 We look forward to the adoption of the Draft Housing Element and continuing to work with the City to meet its affordable housing needs. Sincerely, Brad Malin, Vice President BRIDGE Housing Corporation B-4