Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Agenda Packet 08-28-1990L a k e Elsinore City Council Agenda 545 CHANEY STREET - LAKE ELSINORE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 - 7:00 P.M. POLICY OF THE CITY C01)[ICIL: "Only those items filed with the City Clerk's (Office by Noon�es Jyd pr_1or a e following Tuesday meeting, not requiring departmental investigation will be considered by the City Council at said meeting". CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS Note: Any person wishing to address City Council on any matter not on the Agenda, must complete a request form available at the speakers podium and submit it to the City Clerk prior to commencement of the meeting. (Comments limited to 3 minutes). PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. S. 9. a. City Council Meeting - August 14, 1990. b. Adjourned City Council Meeting - August 20, 1990 C. Planning Commission Meeting - August 1, 1990. Investment Report - July 31, 1990. Warrant List - August 15, 1990. Agreement relating to the California Identification System. Award of Contract - Machado Park Project - J & R Landscaping Company. Proposal for Shoreline Clean-up. Resolution Designating the Location of Stop Intersections. Truck Route Resolution. Request for Waiver of Prezoning and Request for Authorization to Initiate an Annexation Information Program. Approve. Approve. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Ratify. Approve Agmt. Award Contract. Accept Proposal. Adopt Res. No. 90-80. Adopt Res. NO. 90-81. Approve Staff Recomm. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 28, 1990 Award of Contracts for Community Center Roofing & Stucco. Award of Bids for Capital Equipment. Developer Fees for Parks and Recreation - Resolution No. 90- . Set public hearing for September 11, 1990 for the following: a. Tentative Parcel Maj2 26326 = Brookstone Development, Inc. A request to consider Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide approximately 20.4 acres into 26 lots. This project is located on the northwest corner of Collier and Central Avenue. PUBLIC HEARINGS Tentative Tract Map 26142 - South Lake Estates. A request for approval of a 114 lot single- family subdivision on a 29.5 acre parcel. The subject property is located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the existing City limits. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 & Industrial Project 89-12 - Brookstone Development. A request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings located at the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. Annexation No. 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development. A request to annex unincorporated County of Riverside Land into the! City of Lake Elsinore and Pre -Zone the 10.68 acres to allow for commercial uses. The subject property is located between Dexter on the northeast and Interstate 15 Freeway on the southwest and the existing city Boundaries on the northwest and southeast. Resolution No. 90-83 & Ordinance No. 903. Zone Change 90-10 = George Along. A request to rezone from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3 (High Density Residential) three adjacent parcels located at the south- east corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. Ordinance No. 904. Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance. Ordinance No. 905. Award Contracts. Award Bids. Auth. Purch. Adopt Res. No. 90-82. Approve Hearing Date. Adopt Neg. Dec. 90-12; Approve Tent. Tract Map 26142, Based on Findings & Conditions. Adopt Neg. Dec. 89-57; Approve TPM 25717 & Ind. Proj. 89-12 Based on Findings & Conditions. Adopt Neg. Dec. 90-22; Approve Annex. No. 55 & Adopt Res. No. 90-83; Approve Zone Change 90-7 & Adopt Ord. No. 903. Adopt Neg. Dec. 90-24; Approve Zone Change 90-10 & Adopt Ord. No. 904 Adopt Ord. No. 905. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 28, 1990 BUSINESS DISCUSSION ITEMS Industrial Project 90-6 = Deleo Clav Tile. A request for a 14, 960 square foot addition to an existing 47,953 square foot industrial building located at the southeast corner of Collier Avenue and Chaney Street. Commercial Project 89-1 - De�sian Review Time Extension = Sam Hsieh. A request for a one-yar time extension on the Design Review approval of an 18,000 square foot commercial/office project located at the northwest corner of San Jacinto Road and Casino Drive. Time Extension Request for Tentative Parcel Map 23381 = Camelot Properties. Appeal of Planning Commission Conditions of ApRKoval Numbers 13, 15, 17, 23, 25, 26, 29. 39, 42 and 43 for Residential Project 90-10 George Alonai. BUSINESS ITEMS Separation of Inland Empire Division - League of California Cities. Appointment of Downtown Design Review Committee Members. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 900. Relating to Zone Change 90-11 - The Clurman Company. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 901. Relating to Zone Change 89-13 - R. Bruce Kemper. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 902. Relating to Second Amendment to Ramsgate Specific Plan. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT Adopt Neg. Dec. 90-29; Approve Ind. Proj. 90-6 Based on Findings & Conditions. Extend Design Review for One -Year Based on Findings. Reaffirm Neg. Dec. 87-38 & Extend to Sept. 11, 1990. Uphold the Planning Commission Decision. Consider & Recomm. Ratify Recomm. Adopt Ord. No. 900. Adopt Ord. No. 901. Adopt Ord. No. 902. I. Z. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. A G E N D A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CNANEY STREET . LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 POLICY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: "Only those items filed with f�� �EC� c -11I vi iiie ReueVelopfflErl' Agency by Noon On Tuesday, ���� prior to the following Tuesday meeting, will be considered by the Agency at said meeting." CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSENT CALENDAR All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved on one motion unless a Boardmember requests separate action on a specific item. A. Minutes 1. August 14, 1990 - Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. B. Investment Report - July 31, 1990. C. Property Acquisition - Rodriguez Disposal Company. D. Tentative Tract Map 26142 - South Lake Estates.) E. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 & Industrial Project 89-12 - Brookstone Development, Inc. F. Annexation No. 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development. G. Zone Change 90-10 - George Alongi. H. Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance PUBLIC HEARINGS BUSINESS ITEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT R RECOMMENDATION Approve. Ratify. Approve Staff Recomm. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 3.990 CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Washburn at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Dominguez. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS Niddo Ryal, 223 Chaney Street, expressed continuing concern with the hazardous traffic situation at the blind curve adjacent to his home. He advised that there had been another near miss by a speeding car recently. He requested that the Botts Dots rumble strip be repaired and that the traffic safety study be completed. PRESENTATIONS CEREMONIALS A. Oath of Office m Planning Commissioners. •lac. City Clerk Kasad issued the oaths of office to re -appointed Planning Commissioners Jeff Brown and Toney Gilenson. Mayor Washburn presented each Commissioner with a plaqued copy of their oaths. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 9 and 13 MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. I. The following Minutes were approved: a. City Council Meeting - July 10, 1990. b. City Council Meeting - July 24, 1990. The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: C. Planning Commission Meeting - July 181 1990. 2. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for AGENDA ITEM H0. • PAGE�_OF PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 July, 1990. 3. Received and ordered filed the Code Enforcement Activity Report for July, 1990. 4. Received and ordered filed the Structure Abatement Activity Report for July, 1990. 5. Ratified the Warrant List for July 31, 1990. 6. Approved Proclamation. for Energy Awareness Month - October, 1990. 7. Adopted New Council Policy relating to Reconsideration of Agenda Items. 8. Approved Designation of Congestion Management Plan Agency and Adopted Resolution No. 90-72. RESOLUTION NO. 90-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,DESIGNATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO PREPARE: THE COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 10. Adopted Traffic Control Resolution No. 90-73 - Establishing a Loading Zone. RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, DESIGNATING LOCATIONS OF LOADING ZONES OF CERTAIN STREETS. 11. Adopted Resolution No. 90-74 - Relating to Placement of Assessment in Connection with Assessment District No. 87-2 - Shoppers Square. RESOLUTION NO. 90-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-68, REQUESTING THE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO PLACE ASSESSMENTS ON THE BILLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES. 12. Adopted Resolution No. 90-75 - Relating to Placement of Assessments in Connection with Assessment District No. 89-1 - Summerhill Bridge Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 90-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION #90-67, REQUESTING THE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO PLACE ASSESSMENTS ON THE BILLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES. 14. Approved Cooperative Agreement for Tract 19358. 15. Approved Right of Entry Permit - Railroad Canyon Road. 16. Accepted Railroad Canyon Road Deeds. 17. Adopted Resolution No. 90-76 postponing the Special Election on Community Facilities District No. 88-3. RESOLUTION NO. 90-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, . h-- {/_ PAGE y —1� 1- PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 CALIFORNIA,AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 , AND SCHEDULING A SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THE COMBINED PROPOSITION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND INCURRING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. 18. Adopted Resolution No. 90-77 making Application for Initiation of Annexation Proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. 90-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. 19. Approved public hearing date of August 28, 1990 for the following: a. Tentative Tract Map. 26142 - South Lake Estates Joint Venture. A request for approval of a 113 lot single-family subdivision on a 29.5 acre parcel. The subject property is located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the existing City Limits. b. Tentative Parcel Man 25717 = Brookstone Development Inc. A request for Tentative Parcel Map approval to allow for the subdivision of 15.29 acres of land into eleven (11) lots ranging in size from 20,080 net square feet to 2.40 net acres. The subject property is located at the north- east corner of Silver and Flint Streets in the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) Zoning District. C. Annexation No. 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development. A request to annex into the City of Lake Elsinore approximately 10.68 acres of land presently located within the County of Riverside and pre -zone subject property from County Rural Residential to C-2 (General Commercial) District. The subject property is located between Dexter Avenue to the northeast and Interstate 15 on the southwest. d. Zone Change 90-10 = George Alongi Dexter Armstrong). A request for a zone change of three parcels (A.P. # 374-071-001, 002, 003) from R-2 residential to R-3 residential to establish consistency with the current General Plan which designates the area as High Density Residential. These parcels are located at the south- east corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 9. Traffic Signal Agreement with County of Riverside = Lakeshore Drive/Machado Street. Mayor Washburn advised that he pulled this item for information to the residents and detailed the cost factors involved in the project. He requested information with regard to timing. AGENl3A�iu.,�••.. • -�-- pAGE_ PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 Public Services Director Kirchner advised that there are street improvements to be made in connection with the signal, and those plans are currently being reviewed. He further advised that the complete project should be ready to bid in late October with construction following within 30 to 45 days. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. 13. Legislative Advocate Agreement = Joe A. Gonsalves & Son. Councilman Winkler concurred with this proposal, but questioned the ability to share the cost with the Redevelopment Agency. Staff confirmed that this could be done. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE AGREEMENT WITH 50% OF THE COST BORNE BY THE CITY AND 50% BORNE BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SUBJECT TO THEIR APPROVAL. City Manager Molendyk advised the Council and Community of the problems causing the current "fish kill" conditions. He further advised that crews would begin working on August 15 at 7 a.m. to remove the 200 to 300 toms of dead fish that have washed up on the shore of the lake. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Conditional Use Permit 90-5 = Lake Elsinore Christian Fellowship. An appeal of Planning Commission denial of a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church in an existing light industrial zoned building. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request and the concern expressed by the Planning Commission in denying the request. The City Clerk reported six written comments in support of the Conditional Use Permit for the church. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. asking those in favor of this item to speak. The following people spoke in favor of this matter citing financial constraints and contributions to the Community toward the reduction of drug and crime problems: Gary Holmes, 32865 Bryant Street Rev. Richard Alvarez, 32551 Baxter Street Frank Sandoval, 33105 Victoria Brook Lane Karen Paulsen, 29125 Baxter Rd., Sun City Carmen Paulus, 15062 Larson Road Pat Paulsen, 29125 Baxter Rd., Sun City Michael Ware:nski, 121 S. Pennsylvania Ave. Sal Poi.domani, 15015 Vista View David Cunningham, President of Parent Church Bill Brandon Troy Bird, 805 Robin Drive Sharon Holmes, 32865 Bryant Street Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 7:51 p.m. Councilman Dominguez inquired whether all churches are required to obtain at C.U.P. Staff confirmed. He echoed the AGENDA ITEM N0. `�,A _'-- - PAGE�OF1 PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 concerns voiced by the Planning Commission, particularly other uses in the proposed zone and the time limitation of a C.U.P. Councilman Buck advised that he has given this situation a great deal of thought and suggested to the pastor that the C -M zone would be more appropriate for this use. He commented that the proposed location is too far into the M-1 zone, nearly in the M-2 zone. He suggested that other C -M projects would be available in the near future and recommended that the church pursue those. Councilman Winkler questioned the existing church in the C -M Zone and what progress they had made. Staff advised that the Lutheran Church currently had approval of grading plans from the County and are proceeding. Councilman Starkey advised that he had been in favor of the Lutheran Church's request, but stressed the need for a time limitation. He also advised that he felt if a C.U.P. should be granted in this case it would be for 2 years and then the church would be required to relocate. Mayor Washburn commented on prior consideration and determinations of this type. He concurred with the Planning Commission's findings and the inappropriateness of this zone for a church. Council discussion relating to other possible locations and timing ensued. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 2 WITH STARKEY AND WINKLER CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTES TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR C.U.P. BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: Findings 1. That the proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is not in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use may be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. 3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by this Title. 4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. 32. Tentative Tract M,� 25831, Zone Change 90-11 and Specific Plan 89-1 Amendment No. 2 = The Clurman Company. A request to approve Tentative Tract Map 25831 for 195 lots, amend the Ramsgate Specific Plan to include this tract and a Zone Change from Rural Residential to Specific Plan. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. AGENDA ITEM N0. 4 PAGEI OF2ZO�-_ PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. asking those in favor of this project to speak. The following people spoke: Don Clurman, applicant and owner, concurred with staff recommendations and commented on redesign work which had been requested by the Planning Commission. He advised that the average lot size for the project is nearly 9,000 square feet. Chris Webber, Hunsake.r and Associates, advised that a letter in support of this project from L. D. Johnson had been submitted to the Planning Commission. He questioned condition #16, which he felt should have been removed after Planning Commission discussions. Staff confirmed that this condition should be deleted. Adelle Abusambra, Dana Point, adjacent property owner of approximately 28 acres advised that he is in favor of this project. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:12 p.m. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-6 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25831, SPECIFIC: PLAN 89-1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NOS. 900 AND 902 AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 90-11 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Findings - Tentative Tract Map 25831 1. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to address the development of this project and a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to address environmental considerations to the same degree as the Ramsgate Specific: Plan tracts. 2. Conditions of Approval have been prepared to address identified impacts and conditions under which the project is currently being considered. These conditions provide a safeguard to insure that the project is keeping with current City goals and policies. 3. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the Ramsgate Specific Plan. 4. The site, subject to the attached conditions, is suitable for this type of development. Findings = Ramsgate specific Plan 89-1, Amendment No. 2 This request and its environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan, were addressed with a Mitigated Negative Declaration. This process makes the proposed project (Tentative Tract Map 25831) subject to the Ramsgate Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program, where applicable in eliminating or substantially lessening the effects of impacts. 2. The Second Amendment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan as modified meets the Specific Plan criteria for content and systematic implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 of the California Government Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. AGENDA ITEM ���•_3 �� /—�- pAOEOF PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 3. Granting of the requested Second Amendment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan as modified will permit reasonable development of the property consistent with its constraints and compatible with adjacent properties and proposed development. 4. The Second Amendment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan as modified will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the project area, nor will it be injurious to the property or improvements in that area or the city as a whole, based upon the provisions of the Plan, mitigation measures and Conditions of Approval. Findings _ Zone Change 90-11 1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. This request is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance governing Specific Plans. 3. This request and its associated project will not have a significant impact on this environment. Planning Department Conditions 1. This Tentative Tract Map shall be subject to the approval of a Specific Plan Amendment, adding this tract to the Ramsgate Specific Plan; and establishing the Specific Plan zoning. 2. Tentative Tract Map 25831 shall expire two (2) years from date of approval unless extended pursuant to State and Local Law or recordation of final map occurs. 3. Applicant shall comply with the approved Ramsgate Specific Plan, as deemed by the Community Development Director. 4. Administrative Design Review shall be required of all residential development prior to the issuance of building permits. Design Review will be required of all non-residential development. 5. Applicant shall record CC & R's for the tract prohibiting on -street storage of boats, motor homes, trailers, and trucks over one -ton capacity, roof mounted or front yard microwave satellite antennas. The CC & R's shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to recordation of final map. 6. The dimensions of all residential lots shown on the Final Tract Map shall comply with the minimum standards established in the Ramsgate Specific Plan. 7. Street names for all streets within the Tentative Map shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Engineering Department Conditions 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 9. Fence locations and walls indicated on a grading or AGENDA ITEM N0. 1_�— PAGE�OF PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 landscape plan and consistent with the Ramsgate Specific Plan shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the release of the Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Grading and construction plans shall incorporate erosion control measures its required by the Chief Building Official. 11. Improvement plans,, including sewer, water and drainage shall be approved prior to the Final Map approval. 12. Grading plans for this subdivision shall comply with the grading objectives and guidelines established in the Ramsgate Specific Plan. 13. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 14. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 15, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 15. Submit a letter of verification "will -serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to Final Map approval. 16. DELETED. 17. Intersecting streets on the inside radius of a curve will only be permitted when adequate sight distance is verified by a registered engineer. 18. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works off -:site improvements (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 19. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 20. All lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 21. Prior to the recordation of the Final Tract Map, all public improvements shall be designed and constructed or bonded for in accordance with plans and specifications meeting the approval of the City Engineer and the Chief Building Official as amended by the Ramsgate Specific Plan. 22. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by serving utility. 23. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 24. The developer shall pay for "No Parking" and Street sweeping signs. 25. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be 146 h��,.PAGE OF.�f�— PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34) as amended by the Specific Plan. 26. All local streets as determined by the Community Development Director shall have sixty (60) feet right-of-way and forty (40) feet curb -to -curb. Restricted local double loaded streets (cul-de-sacs and looped streets 1,000 feet or less) shall have fifty (50) feet of right-of-way and thirty-six (36) feet curb -to -curb with a three (3) foot utility easement on each side of the street. 27. Desirable grade for local streets is nine percent (9%). A maximum grade of fifteen percent (15%) should only be used in design constraint considerations. 28. Developer shall contribute to the City's Master Entry way Sign Program at a rate of $100.00 per forty (40) dwellings. 29. Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to approval of Final Map. 30. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District standards. 31. Provide Soils, Geology and seismic reports including street design recommendations prior to recordation of Final Map. Provide final Soils Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification. 32. The developer shall be generally eligible for reimbursement agreements from surrounding developments for the cost of off-site improvements required of this project. 33. The fifty (50) foot Southern California Edison (SCE) easement running through the tract shall be landscaped with the approval of the Community Development Director and SCE. SCE generally limits landscaping to that, which on maturity, won't grow higher than fifteen (15) feet in height and no trees or shrubs within twenty (20) feet of the power pole or structure. 34. "L" Street in Tract 25479 shall be evaluated and approved by the Community Development Director to determine if it is appropriate for extension into this tract prior to the approval of a Final Map for this tract. Building/Safety Department Conditions 35. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 36. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection. 37. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid or otherwise agreed upon. 38. All structures shall be designed to incorporate all state AGENDA ITEMNO. ____—/a/ //--- — PAGE___74__aF_1--- PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 and local water conservation regulations, subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official. 39. All building shall. be constructed with fire retardant roofing materials as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building (rode. 40. Submit a schedule of public works improvements based upon the timing of occupancy of the tract prior to final map approval. 41. All lots will be served with mail delivery units subject to the approval of the Lake Elsinore Postmaster, Community Development Director and Public Works Director. 42. The applicant shall agree to be a participant in the preparation of a specific plan on the property north of this tract. This obligation would be for the purpose of modifying the edgers of this tract as may be required to properly develop the neighboring property. If the Specific Plan is not initiated prior to the Certificate of Occupancy on the final unit, this obligation will be waived. 43. Trellis Lane shall be improved between this tract and Highway 74 with a minimum of 2 paved lanes or as required of Tentative Tract Map 25479 should its recordation occur first, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 44. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 45. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 46. Prior to the Final Map recordation, a public works construction agreement shall be entered into with the developer (s), owner(s), and the City. 47. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works improvements as established for the project by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. 48. With the development of this site, all storm facilities shall provide tract and downstream property owners with 100 year storm flood protection. 49. Applicant shall obtain off-site drainage acceptance letters from affected adjacent property owners to be recorded prior to or with final map. 50. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by developer per City standard, tapes to be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. If at the time of Certificate of Occupancy no system has been established by the City, this condition shall be waived, and the Developer will pay a fee of $1,000.00 per street for future final tract digitizing. 51. If this tract develops before the Ramsgate tracts this applicant will be responsible for providing two (2) paved access roads to his tract as approved by the City Engineer. AG GiY Jr� s 1 r.•: ••.• . PAOE� PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 52. Applicant shall contribute five percent (5%) towards the cost of design and construction of the traffic signals per the circulation recommendation by the traffic study by Kunzman Associates. 53. A portion of Tract 25831 lies within an area which is part of the hydrology study for the Ramsgate Project. The applicant shall coordinate with said study and construct facilities required to safely collect and convey off-site tributary flows through the site by a method approved by the City Engineer. ORDINANCE NO. 900 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 50 ACRES LOCATED SUCH THAT IT IS SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY IS ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF TRELLIS LANE, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74 FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN. (THE CLURMAN COMPANY) UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 902 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE RAMSGATE DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 33. Annexation No. 51 and Zone Change 89-13 - North Gate Downs L. Bruce Kemper). A request to annex 160 gross acres into the City of Lake Elsinore and to pre -zone the site R-1 (HPD) (Single -Family Residential -Hillside Planned Development Overlay District). The site is north of Tuscany Hills Specific Plan Area and Greenwald Avenue, northwest of Canyon Lake and southerly of Dorchester Lane. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. asking those in favor of this item to speak. The following person spoke: AGENDA ITEM X10• • ' PAGE�OF�_ PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 Michael Klipa, Civil Engineer for the applicant, requested Council approval of this project and offered to answer questions. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to this project to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:17 p.m. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-38; APPROVE ANNEXATION NUMBER 51 AND ZONE CHANGE 89-13, ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-78 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 901 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: Findings = Annexation No. 51 1. The project is located within the City's Sphere of Influence as designated by the Local Agency Formation Commission and is contiguous to the City Limit boundary. Annexation of the site would not be an inappropriate extension of the City Limit boundary. 2. The proposal will not result in significant environmental impacts. 3. It is anticipated. that future development of the site will be conditioned to provide the necessary public services and facilities to service the site. Findings = Zone Change 89-13 1. The proposed zoning is the most appropriate zone for standard single-family residential development. 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with residential zoning in surrounding City developments. 3. The pre -zoning proposal is not inconsistent with the General Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 90-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE C;ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 51 - NORTH GATE DOWNS (R. BRUCE KEMPER). ORDINANCE NO. 901 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 160 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF TUSCANY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND GREENWALD AVENUE NORTHWEST OF CANYON LAKE, AND SOUTHERLY OF DORCHESTER LANE TO R-1 (HPD) (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT•- HILLSIDE PLANNED DISTRICT) (NORTHGATE DOWNS - R. BRUCE KEMPER). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCIIME14BERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILME14BERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILME14BERS: NONE AGENDA ITEM. -,+v._ Lh. , __ PAS OF� PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 34. Tentative Financial Parcel Map 25638 _ Lona Beach Equities. A request to create four (4) parcels, where currently nine (9) exist. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request which is part of the Alberhill Specific Plan area. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. asking those in favor of this map to speak. The following person spoke: John Friedman, Long Beach Equities, explained the need for this reconfiguration of parcels and requested consideration of a change in Condition #5. He requested that the right-of-way be set a 120 feet until the time the 130 width can be justified by development and traffic. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. Councilman Buck questioned Condition #5 and whether it would be acceptable to change it to 120 foot width. Staff confirmed that would be acceptable with the understanding that future development would most likely require dedication of the addition 10 feet. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-10 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE FINANCIAL PARCEL MAP 25638 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH CONDITION #5 CHANGED TO REQUIRE 120 FOOT DEDICATION, SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL 10 FEET AT A LATER DATE, IF NECESSARY: Findings 1. A Negative Declaration has been prepared to acknowledge that environmental impacts have been addressed in the EIR for the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (SCN 88090517). 2. Conditions of Approval have been prepared to address identified conditions under which the project is currently being considered. These conditions provide a safeguard to insure that the project is keeping with current City goals and policies. 3. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. 4. The site, subject to the attached conditions, is suitable for this type of development. Conditions _ Tentative Financial Parcel Map 25638 1. The approval of this Tentative Parcel Map 25638 is for financing and sale purposes only. No building permit or grading permits or any other building or construction activity is authorized pursuant to this Tentative Parcel Map 25638. Property within Tentative Tract Map shall apply for approval pursuant to the normal City of Lake Elsinore procedures prior to any building or grading activity on the subject site. 2. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore (Municipal Code 16.52.030). PAGE 2a OF_� PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 3. All parcels shall have access to public right-of-way or be provided a minimum forth (40) foot ingress -egress easement for public right-of-way purposes to be recorded with the map or by separate instrument. 4. Execute an agreement to annex to the City's Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District. 5. With respect to Parcel 4 dedicate 120 foot street right-of-way for the easterly 1,150 feet of Nichols Road. 6. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on Nichols Road between Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 for a 130 foot street right-of-way. 7. Cooperate with the City and its Engineer, Webb Engineering, in the dedication of sufficient right-of-way on Collier Avenue and its intersection with Nichols Road. 8. The design for development of Parcels 1 and 2 shall take into account the access needs of the property northerly of them (Assessor's Parcel Number 390-270-005), so as not to landlock said property. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS. 51. City Allocation of Take of Occupied Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Under the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan. Resolution 90-79. City Attorney Harper requested a closed session on this item, following consideration of the balance of the business items. 52. Business License Application. A request for license to operate an ice cream truck. City Manager Molendyk advised that based on management discussions of this item, he would recommend continuance to allow for development: of criteria and standards for this type of business. Councilman Dominguez detailed his concerns with this type of business and instructed staff to include them in the criteria. His concerns included: 1) what other merchandise will be sold, 2) hours and days of operation, 3) locations where they will park, 4) directions with regard to traffic and speed limits in residential. areas, 5) requirement for physical examination of all drivers, 6) vendor license fee and applicable D.B.A. assessments and 7) direction with regard to enforcement (who will enforce?). MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER. BUSINESS ITEMS 53. Second Reading = ordinance No. 899. Relating to the West Lake Elsinore Development Agreement. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 899: NO. 899 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE WEST LAKE ELSINORE DEVELOPERS (CENTEX REAL ESTATE, LA LAGUNA ESTATES, MARINITA Avg.._ �.a�1-•.-._ PACE_OF__ PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PREMIER HOMES, MEEKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, TOMICH/JONES, TORN RANCH, AND GOLDEN STATE DEVELOPERS). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CLOSED SESSION THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 8:30 P.M. TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:11 P.M. 51. City Allocation of Take of Occupied Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Under the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan Cont. Resolution 90-99. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO A SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 1990 AT 4:00 P.M. IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Molendyk advised that staff is working to establish a Study Session date with the Public Safety Committee. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Dominguez commented on the success of the Hot August Night Sidewalk Sale. He requested a report on the Police Ballot Measure. City Attorney Harper advised that there was not sufficient time to prepare for placement of this matter on the November Ballot. He explained that tax rate formula must be studied and established before the ballot measure is placed. Councilman Dominguez also directed staff to clean up the trash which is being dumped at the end of Railroad Canyon Road. Councilman Starkey commented on the work underway in the Downtown area and encouraged the Community to support these businesses in spite of the inconvenience. He requested an update on the T & S Development sidewalk repairs. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that the plans are being drawn now and should be ready within the next month. Councilman Winkler advised that the Western Riverside COG would be jointly sponsoring a seminar with the School District Organization on October 13, 1990 and encouraged the Council to plan on attending. He requested that the City Clerk write letters of invitation for the School Board Members and Dr. Larry Maw. Councilman Winkler also commented on the County Growth Management Plan and advised of a meeting on September 6, at 1:30 p.m. and encouraged Council to attend and provide input. Councilman Buck inquired about Mr. Ryal's concerns. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that the missing dots would be replaced shortly, but advised that short of closing the street completely there is very little else that can be done to correct AGENDA ITEM NO. -•_Q- , PAGE1y,LOF- _ PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 the problem. He further advised that the appropriate location for a block wall had been determined, but Mr. Ryal had not yet built it. Mr. Ryal clarified that they were previously prepared to proceed with the wall, but their crew was no longer available. Councilman Dominguez commented on the need to slow the speeding cars down to prevent accidents. Mayor Washburn emphasized the need to study problems such as these at the planning stage before irreconcilable problems occur. Councilman Buck requested that the C.U.P. fees be waived for the church group when they submit application for another C.U.P. Staff clarified that they would be able to apply for a waiver of fees and Council can make that determination. Mayor Washburn commented on the Combat Auto Theft (CAT) program. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WASHBURN, VOTE TO ADJOURN THE MONDAY, AUGUST 20, CONFERENCE ROOM. ATTEST: SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:29 P.M. TO 1990 AT 4:00 P.M. IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GARY M. WASHBURN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA IC ��� PAGE_�OF___SJ�— MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 20, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Washburn at 4:06 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Washburn. 3. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCIL14EMBERS: DOMINGUEZ Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner, Building & Safety Manager Shear (representing Community Development Director) and City Clerk Kasad. 4. BUSINESS ITEM A. City Allocation of Take of Occupied Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Under the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan. Resolution No. 90-79. City Attorney Harper advised that the Memorandum of Understanding has not been approved by the State. He suggested that since a more specific direction is not available, the Council discuss this matter in closed session as it relates to potential litigation. Paul Seltzer, detailed the process which has proceeded over the last 18 months. He explained that the document as it reads now has a number of changes, but the only substantial problem remaining has to do with the need to obtain individual permits on a project by project basis. He advised that this issue could be resolved as early as August 21st via conference call. City Attorney Harper inquired with regard to the time frame of the permit. Mr. Seltzer advised that it would still be for the two years. City Attorney Harper questioned the impact of the State permit on the Federal impact. Mr. Seltzer advised that it would not change anything in regard to the Federal permit. City Attorney Harper requested a closed session for potential litigation and and update on the Adams Advertising Litigation. He recommended that the Council refrain from any specific action at this time. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO TABLE THIS ITEM. - AGENDA [TEM N0. I�-- PAGE ' OF_d PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 20, 1990 THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 4:26 P.M. TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL AND PENDING LITIGATION. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 4:55 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN. 5. ADJOURNMENT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:56 P.M. ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GARY M. WASHBURN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE.42, MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSI HELD ON THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 1990 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:01 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Gilenson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners: Gilenson, Saathoff, Wilsey and Brown ABSENT: Commissioners: Brinley' Also present were Community Development Director Gunderman, Associate Planners Restivo and Naaseh, Assistant Planners Fairbanks and DeGange, Consulting Planner Smothers, and Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell. I MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Gilenson to approve minutes of July 18, 1990, as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC COMMENTS There being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed the PUBLIC COMMENTS section. UBLIC HEARINGS 1. Zone Change 90-3 and Conditional Use Permit 90-1 - Atlantic Richfield (AM/PM Mini Mart) - Continued from June 20, 1990 - Chairman Brown stated that staff has requested that this item be continued to September 5, 1990. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m., and asked for a motion to continue. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Zone Change 90-3 and Conditional Use Permit 90-1 to the meeting of September 5, 1990, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 2. General Plan Amendment 90-4 - Leroy Grunder (Continued from June 20, 1990) - Chairman Brown stated that staff has requested that this item be continued indefinitely. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m., and asked for a motion to continue. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to continue General Plan Amendment 90-4 indefinitely, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 3. Conditional Use Permit 90-5 - Lake Elsinore Christian Fellowship (Continued from July 5, 1990) - Community Development Director Gunderman presented a request to allow a church facility to operate in an existing structure zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing). Proposed project site is at 571-D Crane Street. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:06 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor of Conditional Use Permit 90-5. Pastor Hilbrant, 29308 Gunder Street, asked that the Commission be open to letting them use the facility. I believe that we have fulfilled every requirement: safety, parking, hours of operation, letter from the developer as far as not letting anyone next to us if the Conditional Use Permit AGENDA !TE!.A %0.' / PAGE / OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-5 CONTINUED is granted. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor. Mr. Dave Cunningham, President of the Corporation that is the parent corporation of the Lake Elsinore Fellowship Corporation, commented on the Zoning Code and a church being allowed if a Conditional. Use Permit is issued. Mr. Cunningham then inquired about the following: - How many Commissioners are aware of how far away this M-1 property is from a C -M location? - How often are the drawings (maps) updated? - How many of you have reviewed the zoning drawings and read Title 17? Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Commissioner Gilenson stated that he stands by his previous comments --not compatible with the area. Commissioner Wilsey stated that he stands by his previous comments. He then stated that he has read Title 17 and reviews it frequently, and can not comment on the other paperwork, as I do not know what it is. Commissioner Saathoff stated that there would be a concern if this was considered with regard to the letter from the developer --in that he indicates there would be no other uses allowed in the vicinity. I do not know how this could be controlled. He then stated that he has with him Title 17 and has reviewed it. Commissioner Saathoff then commented on Mr. Cunningham's comment that the church has no nuisance or hazardous characteristics. We appreciate that, but we are saying that there are characteristics of other uses allowed in the M-1 that would be a nuisance to a public gathering, such as a church. Also, you indicated in your comments reference to Commercial -Manufacturing not M-1 and you make reference to whether it would make sense to allow a business which requires a public assembly in a location that has intense truck traffic. Businesses permitted under Section 17.54 could operate seven days a week, 24 hours a day, and this holds true in a manufacturing zone. This is why we have a Conditional Use Permit, because there are certain circumstances where we might not allow it in a commercial -manufacturing zone. Commissioner Saathoff stated that he stands with the other Commissioners, and by his previous statements --does not feel this is compatible in the M-1 District. Chairman Brown asked Mr. Cunningham which documents he was referring to. Mr. Cunningham responded Title 17. There were some question as to whether some of my excerpts were actually from those documents. I also reviewed the General Plan as well as your AGENDA ITER N'O. PAGE a QF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-5 CONTINUED zoning drawings, of which this particular project, as I stated a moment ago, is how many are aware that there is a C -M Zone that is right on the other side of the wall from this M-1, and Commissioner Saathoff answered that in part. There could be, even though you have left yourself the opportunity for approval, that possibly if we came back with a C -M location we would be faced with the same consideration. There are also other comments through out the documents which the City Attorney replied to, or stated that all of this could be null and void if in fact the Community Development Director has determined that with a Conditional Use Permit a church could meet in M-1. It is also the comment to which the City Attorney included all of these considerations given that the Conditional Use Permit could be granted if in fact it is compatible, as the statement continues to be made. The compatibility, however, doesn't seem to be based on the condition at hand, but what future conditions there might be. Chairman Brown commented on the letter from the owner of the property indicating he would be willing to remove all the inventory of M-1 within the project so that the church could utilize the facility. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to deny Conditional Use Permit 90-5 based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 4. Tentative Tract Map 26142 - South Lake Estates Joint Venture (Continued from July 18, 1990) - Associate Planner Naaseh presented a request for approval of a 113 lot single-family subdivision on a 29.5 acre parcel, located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the existing City Limits. Associate Planner Naaseh request the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 14: Delete Condition No. 41 "Final Map shall incorporate Lots 110 and 113 as one lot or applicant may grant said Lot 113 to adjacent property owner at applicant's discretion prior to final map approval." Condition No. 73: "Developer shall contribute $7,000 towards the design and construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at least six percent (6%) and should contribute six percent (6$) ($7,000) towards construction." Condition No. 87: "Stoneman shall be improved to a twenty- four foot roadbed (half -width) from centerline and a sloped AC parkway five- foot (51) from property line subject to the approval of the City Engineer and permitting continued use as a storm drain channel." Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m., asking if there was anyone present wishing to speak in favor. Gr PA( `� � Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 4 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CO1gTINUED Mr. John Elmajian, Wesco Homes, representing South Lake Estates Joint Venture, stated that they are in agreement with the conditions of approval. : Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey asked if it is anticipated for Stoneman to be continued through the floodplain area. Community Development Director Gunderman responded in the negative. Commissioner Wilsey thein commented on the Class II bicycle requirement on Stoneman and whether or not this is sufficient, suggested that Dick Watenpaugh, Community Services, review this for a multi -use trail rather than just a bicycle path. Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 57, pertaining to water rights; condition number 80, if standards for digitizing have been developed, and if City Council is going to have an ordinance or policy to mandate. Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 42, requesting clarification on avigation easements; condition number 32, pertaining to decorative block or masonry wall around the perimeter of the subdivision --might have a problem with requiring this, but this comes back to Design Review. Commissioner Saathoff then commented on a general purpose trail on Stoneman within the site itself rather than a Class II bicycle lane. What is between, in the developments, this development and -Grand Avenue on Stoneman --has there been anything other than Class II required? Community Development Director Gunderman staged that he believes it has been Class II. Commissioner Saathoff stated that he would have a concern about the location of this particular tract map closer to the floodplain area and starting a general purpose trail and not having it between Grand Avenue and this map. Commissioner Wilsey stated that we have a half -street width that is being improved now, so we have nothing that has happened on the other side, and if we call it to Mr. Watenpaugh's attention he can start to review that as those projects come in. Chairman Brown commented on the 40 -foot drainage easement running down the boundary and if there is any armoring, planting or erosion control proposed within that 40 -feet; placing perimeter fencing on the property line as opposed to the top of the slope; boundary wall section on the southeast side and if this is indicative of what would be the ten -foot easement. Discussion ensued on condition number 31 and 32, pertaining to landscaping, fencing and maintenance, and this coming back for Minor Design Review. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-12 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 26142 based on the Findings and subject to ArGENDA iTE PAGE OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 5 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED the 90 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 14: Delete Condition No. 41: "Final Map shall incorporate Lots 110 and 113 as one lot or applicant may grant said Lot 113 to adjacent property owners at applicant's discretion prior to final map approval." Condition No. 73: "Developer shall contribute $7,000 towards the design and construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at least six percent (6$) and should contribute six percent (6%) ($7,000) towards construction." Condition No. 87: "Stoneman shall be improved to a twenty-four foot roadbed (half - width) from centerline and a sloped AC parkway five-foot (5') from property line subject to the approval of the City Engineer and permitting continued use as a storm drain channel." Second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 5. Tentative Tract Map 25831 (Continued from July 18, 1990); Zone Change 90-11 and Ramsgate Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 - The Clurman Company, Inc. - Consulting Planner Smothers presented a request to subdivide 50 acres into 195 lots, an amendment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan (adjusting the boundaries to include this tract), a Zone Change from Rural Residential to Specific Plan. The site is located such that it is surrounded on three sides by the Ramsgate Specific Plan, on the northerly side of Ramsgate. The western boundary of this tract is along the southerly extension of Trellis Lane, south of Highway 74. Consulting Planner Smothers gave an overview on the changes made at the Commission's request, and the Environmental Impact Report with regard to the letter from Cal Trans stating concern on freeway impacts and the cumulative impact. He also stated that this map is being presented by the applicant as a Vesting Tentative Map. Staff is of the opinion that this does not present a problem here, because the project is subjective to Specific Plan regulations and requirements for infra- structure. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. A4�lVLR II'�:rI�t-.a PAGE � GE /-- Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 6 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25831; ZONE CHANGE 90-11 AND AMENDMENT NO, 2 CONTINUED Commissioner Wilsey commented on maintenance of slopes, and Homeowner Association maintenance area, and fencing of parcels. Commissioner Gilenson commented on lot sizes and the Staff Report and Exhibit indicating 51 lots still under 6,000 square feet; condition number 312, pertaining to reimbursement agree- ments and who they are from; condition number 46, pertaining to public works construction agreement. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-6 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 25831 ;(53 Conditions), Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (3 Conditions), and Zone Change 90-11 based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson with discussion. Commissioner Gilenson asked if the motion included the additional verbiage to condition number 32. Commissioner Wilsey amended his motion to include the amendment to condition number 32, as follows: Condition No. 32: "The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement agreements from surrounding developments for the cost of off-site improvements required of this project." Commissioner Gilenson amended his second to include the amendment to the motion.. Approved 4-0 6. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 - Brookstone Development, Inc. Community Development Director Gunderman presented a request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction (on the subject property) of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings totaling approximately 60,985 square feet, located on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. Community Development Director Gunderman requested that condition number 5 of Industrial Project 89-12 be deleted and condition number 6 for Tentative Parcel Map 25717 be deleted, and gave the reasoning behind the deletion of these conditions. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Mr. Vince Daly, representing Brookstone Development, commented on staff's concerns listed on Page 3 of the Staff Report, items 1-6, and requested that the Commission approve this project as amended by staff. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. kip.. ;...._ PACE Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 7 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 & INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-12 CONTINUED Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 21, for Industrial Project 89-12, and suggested the following verbiage be added: "fee to be determined at the time of application." Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-57 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval (35 for Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and 27 for Industrial Project 89-12) listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Tentative Parcel Map 25717: Condition No. 6: Delete Industrial Prosect 89-12: Condition No. 5: Delete Condition No. 21: "A Final Landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and include landscape and irrigation specifications to be approved by the City's Landscape Architect, fee to be determined at time of application. The revised plans should be prepared and signed by a licensed Landscape Architect and include the following:" Second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 At this time, 8:00 p.m., the Planning Commission recessed. At this time, 8:12 p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened. 7. Annexation 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development LP - Community Development Director Gunderman presented a request to annex 10.68 acres of unincorporated County of Riverside land into the City of Lake Elsinore and to pre -zone the property C-2 (General Commercial). The subject property is located between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and I-15 freeway on the southwest and the existing City boundaries on the northwest and southeast. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. There being no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner adoption of Negative Annexation 55 and Zone 1 Condition of Approval Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 Wilsey to recommend to City Council Declaration 90-22 and approval of Change 90-7 based on the Findings and listed in the Staff Report, second by 8. Zone Change 90-10 - George Alongi - Assistant Planner DeGange presented a request for a Zone Change on three parcels from R- 2, Residential; to R-3, Residential, to establish consistency AG�_NDA ITEM N' PAGE— -. Q=—AL Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 8 ZONE CHANGE 90-10 CONTINUED with the current General Plan. the southeast corner of the Langstaff Streets. These parcels are located at intersection of Pottery and Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Ms. Ann Armstrong, 304 West Pottery Street, stated that they would like to see the property remain R-2. Ms. Armstrong then commented on the surrounding uses and the problems they have incurred. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in opposition or on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public: hearing at 8:17 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey commented on conformity with the General Plan, and Ms. Armstrong's comments and requested staff indicate what alternatives she has with regard to R -2/R-3. Commissioner Saathoff commented on the Zoning and General Plan designation --agrees with R-3 in this area. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-24 and approval of Zone Change 90-10 based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 9. Parking Determination 90-1 and Industrial Project 90-6 - Deleo Clay Tile - Joe Deleo - Associate Planner Restivo presented a request to reduce the parking requirements specified in Section 17.66.030.C, and for the construction of a 12,240 square foot addition to an existing industrial building, on the southeast corner of Chaney and Collier. Associate Planner Rest:ivo requested the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 4a: All existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. Condition No. 4b: Loading zones shall be striped on-site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. Condition No. 38: Delete Condition No. 40: Delete Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:20 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. •.L PAGE , --L OF lU Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 9 ARRING DETERMINATION 90-1 AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 CO Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 19.b., recommending that 15 gallon be changed to 24 inch box; condition number 2 of Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3, and the conditions for industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 being incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this proposal, added as condition number 41. Commissioner Wilsey commented on seeing the improvements to the property as outlined in Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3, parking space count --83 not being a viable number for this type of operation, however, 28 spaces is not enough, and prohibiting on -street parking on Chaney and Minthorn Streets. Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 21 with regard to all conditions being fulfilled and the indication that a completion bond for all site improvements will be required, but not included in the conditions, and this being added to condition number 23; parking space requirements and the need for flexibility --there should be some relief, but reluctant to go from 83 to 28 spaces; designating an area for 55 parking spaces as referenced on Industrial Project 87-3, if required. Chairman Brown commented on the parking space count; if the use were to change whether or'not parking can still be met; an easement being placed on the property for parking purposes, if the use should change; number of employees per shift, and enforcement. Discussion ensued on designating an area for parking, and whether or not this parking area should be kept clear of all storage; the number of parking spaces to be designated; its location, and enforcement tools available to the City. Motion by Commissioner Gilenson to approve Parking Determination 90-1 based on the Findings and recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-1 and approval of Industrial Project 90-6 based on the Findings and subject to the 40 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 4a: "All existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval of : the Community Development Director or his designee." Condition No. 4b: "Loading zones shall be striped on- site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee." Condition No. 19b: Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and at least 24 inch box in size, as approved by the Community Development Director." v=i<lA 1iEi.'Sa PAGE q_ OF /� Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 10 PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 CONTINUED Condition No. 38: Delete Condition No. 40: Delete Condition No. 41: "Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 incorporated herein by reference where applicable." Condition No. 42: "Dedicate or set aside sufficient land for an additional 55 parking spaces, location to be determined by the Community Development Director. Said property can be used for storage until a determination by the Community Development Director is made that parking spaces shall be provided. Second by Commissioner Saathoff with discussion. Commissioner Saathoff asked if the maker of the motion would include bonding for improvements. Chairman Brown inquired about the dedication of parking area and how this is to be recorded --what agreements? Community Development Director Gunderman suggested that the parking area be identified on the site/construction plans. Commissioner Gilenson amended his motion to include the following amendments: Condition No. 23: Add "A completion bond shall be posted for all site improvements." Condition No. 42: "The site plan, that is a part of the building permit plans, shall designate the dedicated future parking area. Said property can be used for storage until a determination by the Community Development Director is made that parking spaces shall be provided." Commissioner Saathoff amended his second to include the amendment to the motion. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 10. Single -Family Residence - 359 Avenue 4 - Assistant Planner DeGange presented a request for Minor Design Review of a single-family manufactured dwelling of 1,006 square feet in size with a 440 square: foot garage placed on a 7,250 square foot lot. The site is approximately 150 feet south of the intersection of Mill and Avenue 4. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 10, recommending that the interior clear space be changed to 916" x 191611) for consistency. Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 11 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE - 359 AVENUE 4 CONTINUED Commissioner Wilsey commented on the fireplace illustrated on the elevations, and recommended that a condition be added addressing same. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to approve Single -Family Residence at 359 Avenue 4 based on the Findings and subject to the 31 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendment: Condition No. 10: "Garage shall be constructed to provide a minimum of nine -feet -six - inches by nineteen -feet -six -inches (91x1916) of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of nineteen by nineteen - feet -six -inches (191x1916")." Condition NO. 32: "Left elevation shall delineate fireplace and chimney as per rendering." Second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 11. Commercial Project 90-4 - Atlantic Richfield (AM/PM Mini -Mart) - Chairman Brown stated that staff has requested this item be continued to September 5, 1990, and called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Commercial Project 90-4 to September 5, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 12. Sign Program - Greg Pitcher (Continued from July 18, 1990) - Assistant Planner Fairbanks presented a request for Minor Design Review of a Sign Program and Center Identification Sign for the Mission Trail Shopping Center. The commercial center is a 6.43 acre site located 1,200 feet east of the northeast corner of Mission Trail and Railroad Canyon Road. Assistant Planner Fairbanks requested the following conditions be added: 1. All minor tenant sign plexiglass panels shall be enclosed in a sign case with a minimum of six -inches of siding surrounding the perimeter of the signs. 2. All major and sub -major tenant signs shall consist of plexiglass individual lettering mounted flush with the surrounding wood siding. 3. Major and sub -major tenant copy on the Center Identification Sign shall not exceed eighteen inches high, minor tenant copy shall not exceed twelve inches high. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Greg Pitcher, representing the applicant, commented on condition number 1 of the additional conditions, requesting the Commission give consideration to 3 inches of border around the minor tenant sign. Other than that we are in complete agreement with staff. Discussion at the table was held on Mr. Pitcher's request. AGENDA ITEM N0. i C PAGE_ZL�OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 12 SIGN PROGRAM CONTINUED Commissioner Saathoff commented on Stater Brothers, Sprouse Ritz and Dalton Books having tan type signs, channel letters. Recommended continuation of the same type signage on the minor tenant signs, just smaller size. Mr. Pitcher stated that the problem with that is tenant change over. Commissioner Gilenson asked if we weren't trying to get away from can signs in commercial centers. Commissioner Saathoff responded not so much on center identification signs. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve the Sign Program for the Mission Trail Center as specified in the July 18, 1990, Staff Report and the Center Identification Sign to be constructed as submitted in the drawings of August 1, 1990, based on the Findings and subject to the 7 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 8: "All minor tenant sign plexiglass panels shall be enclosed in a sign case with siding surrounding the perimeter of the signs, margin to be determined by the Community Development Director." Condition No. 9: "All major and sub -major tenant signs shall consist of plexiglass individual lettering mounted flush with the surrounding wood siding." Condition No. 10: "Major and sub -major tenant copy on the Center Identification Sign shall not exceed eighteen inches high, minor tenant copy shall not exceed twelve inches high." Second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 13. Extension of Time for Commercial Project 89-3 - Ray Grage - Assistant Planner Fairbanks presented a request for a 90 day time extension to allow time to secure a construction loan. Staff is requesting that a 180 day time extension be granted. There being no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to grant a 180 day time extension for Commercial Project 89-3 based on the Findings listed in the Memorandum of August 1, 1990, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 14. Residential Project 90-9 - Osborne Development Corporation - Associate Planner Naaseh presented a request for Minor Design Review of 100 single -gamily units including a four (4 unit model home complex. The project consists of portions of Tracts 24138, 24139 and all sof Tract 24215. The project is located at the northeast side of the intersection of Ontario Way and Grand Avenue. Associate Planner Naase:h requested the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 32.c: Delete AGENDA ITEM NO. ' PAGE �� OF 16 Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 13 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-9 CONTINUED Condition No. 39: Delete Condition No. 50: As per the Airport Land Use Commission letter dated July 24, 1990, prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall: 1) Convey an avigation easement to the Skylark Airport, and; 2) The design and construction of the structures will permit a maximum interior noise level of 45db." Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. John Sands, representing Osborne Development, gave a brief overview of the proposal, and then requested that the Airport Land Use Commission letter, condition number 50, be considered by the Community Development Director as to timing to have this accomplished. We would request that this not be tied to point of pertinence. Discussion ensued on condition number 50, pertaining to the Airport Land Use Commission letter regarding avigation easements; amending condition by changing the words "building permits" to "Certificate of Occupancy", and this also applies to the model homes --no release of utilities and this includes temporary hook-up of permanent power, and enforcement of said condition. Commissioner Gilenson commented on conditions 15, 19, 20, 21, and 22, stating that he does not believe these conditions are applicable to this project; condition number 32, requested that the 11$130.00 per plan fee" be replaced with "fee to be determined at time of submittal"; condition number 35, change 20' to 1916"; condition number 7, pertaining to Certificate of Occupancy not being released if there is a problem with any unit. Discussion ensued on condition number 7 and its intent. Motion by Commissioner Gilenson to re -affirm Negative Declaration 89-7 and approve Residential Project 90-9 based on the Findings and subject to the 48 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 7: Delete Condition No. 15: Delete Condition No. 19: Delete Condition No. 20: Delete Condition No. 21: Delete Condition No. 22: Delete Condition No. 32: "The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for a fee to be determined at time of submittal, and the Community Development Director or his designee." PAGr-L OF-ZE—) Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 14 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-9 C0TINUED Condition No. 32c: Delete Condition No. 36: "Garage shall be constructed to provide a minimum of nine -feet -six - inches by nineteen -feet -six -inches (916" x 191611) of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of nineteen - feet by nineteen -feet -six -inches." Condition No. 40: Delete Condition No. 50: "As per the Airport Land Commission letter dated July 1990, prior to issuance Certificate of applicant shall: avigation easement Airport, and; 2) construction of the permit a maximum level of 45 db." Second by Commissioner Saathoff. Use 24, of Occupancy the 1) Convey an to the Skylark The design and structures will interior noise Chairman Brown asked for discussion on condition number 50, pertaining to the noise level of 45 db. Discussion ensued on said condition. Community Development Director Gunderman suggested amending condition number 50, .as follows: "Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy the project shall comply with the requirements of the Airport Land Use Commission, as applicable. Commissioner Gilenson stated that he would prefer to leave the motion as stated. Chairman Brown suggested the condition remain, and if you want to add a caveat to the condition that it can be amended with approval of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission that is okay. Commissioner Gilenson amended his motion to include the amendment to condition number 50, as follows: Condition No. 50: "As per the Airport Land Use Commission letter dated July 24, 1990, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, or as amended by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, the applicant shall: 1) Convey an avigation easement to the Skylark Airport, and; 2) The design and construction of the structures will permit a maximum interior noise level of 45 db." Commissioner Saathoff amended his second to include the amendment to the motion. Approved 4-0 PAG ZO"-A(2— Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 15 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Community Development Director Gunderman informed the Commission of the following General Plan Town Hall Meetings: 1st Meeting: August 7, 1990, 6:30 p.m., at Elsinore Unified School District Board Room. 2nd Meeting: August 20, 1990, 6:30 p.m., at Terra Cotta Junior High School. 3rd Meeting: August 30, 1990, 7:00 p.m., at the Community Center. Community Development Director Gunderman informed the Commission that Commissioners Brown and Gilenson will be sworn in at the City Council Meeting on August 14, 1990, and at the meeting of August 15, 1990, elections for Chairman and Vice Chairman will be conducted. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissioner Gilenson Commented on the following: 1. Banner signs off Casino Drive, facing the freeway, within the Shopper's Square Center, how long will these banner signs be allowed to remain? Also, status of the dish antennas within this center. 2. Fruit vendor at the corner of Gunnerson and Lakeshore, this is County property, as I understand it. But coming all the way down from Gunnerson to Stater Brothers there are street signs, can we get these removed? Also, can we contact the County, as they are making a mini flea - market out there. Community Development Director Gunderman stated that staff will contact the County. Commissioner Wilsey Nothing to report. Commissioner Saathoff Commented on the re -appointment of Commissioners Gilenson and Brown. Chairman Brown Commented on the original approval of the Black Sea Cafe being conditioned to provide off-site parking through a lease, and believes with the new owners this is gone. There are some real issues not only with that business but with the parking. Assumes that the condition followed the building. Community Development Director Gunderman responded in the affirmative. Inquired about the status of the triplex on Robertson. Community Development Director Gunderman stated that this is now in abatement. Commissioner Brinley Absent ke PP. 0- /�C� Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 16 There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adjourned at 9:43 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 Approved, Respectfully submitted, Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary Jeff Brown, Chairman AG N7'A 4?Er`, NO. // /� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS JULY 31, 1990 INTEREST DATE RATE PURCHASED LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND 8.517% DAILY GOVERNMENT BACKED SECURITIES = NEGOTIABLE FEDERAL HOME MORTG. CO. 8.000% 02-09-87 GOV. NATIONAL MORTG. ASS. 8.000% 05-17-88 MATURITY DATE AMOUNT 24-HOUR $4,700,000 06-01-16 211,490 11-15-00 95.682 307,172 CITY INVESTMENT TOTAL 5,007,172 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - AUGUST 1990 **Will meet anticipated expenditures AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE....... 8.172% $ 950,000 AGENDA ITEMNO. PAGE `OF—A� LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. DATE 08/15/90 HER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANTCHECK N DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CNG'0 INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT A - Z BUS SALES 2025 30.53 • ACE LOCK & KEY 2025 104.40 • ALLANS POWER d EQUIPMENT REI 2025 146.84 • APPLE ONE 2026 183.26 ARTISAN GOLDSMITHS d AWARDS 20261 139.83 • DONALD BANFIELD 2OP6 120.00 s BEST CONCRETE CO. 2024 850.00 * BIG AL OIL CO. 20P6 2202.40 s CYNTHIA BLOOD -WILSON 2026 601.60 s BOB BOONE 2026 50.00 s H.S.I. CONSULTANTS, INC. 2026 255.00 t BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2026 4709.12 s C.M.S. BUSINESS FORMS 2026 781.68 s THE CALIFORNIAN 2026 28.80 • CALIF. BOARD OF EQUALIZATIOt 20241 455.12 s CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMEP 2027 3217.52 s CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMEIS 20271 162.30 • CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPME 20239 2723.81 s CALIF. PARK d RECREATION 20272 90.00 s STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 0130 7695.P..8 • CAPITOL LEASING CO. 20273 154.82 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 20274 73.95 + A SNDA i EM N0. PAO �_OF LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. 2 DATE 08/15/90 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 20e75 317.52 • CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. 20276 495.64 s DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE 0277 79.23 • LINDA DAVIS 20242 35.18 • DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 20278 534.20 E.V.M.W.D. 20279 4696.85 • £.V.M.W.D. 20280 3454.63 s ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY,I 20281 2397.58 • ELSINORE OFFICE PRODUCTS 20282 187.06 ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER CO. 20283 771.47 • ELSINORE READY MIX CO., INC. 20284 41.95 s ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT zoess 50.00 + ERNST & YOUNG 2OL386 1500.00 • EXPRESS BLUEPRINT INC. 20287 109.23 * FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 20288 157.00 • FIRST TRUST BANK 20253 25806.23 0 FLAIR DATA, INC. 20289 4158.18 + FRED'S ELECTRIC 20290 70.00 • G.T.E.L. 20291 2007.70 s GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 20292 962.SS • GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 20248 383.70 • KARRIE GONZALES 20293 128.00 AG NDA IT M NO. PACE OF FS LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. 3 DATE 08/15/90 IEA PAYEE WARRANTCHECK DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG-0 INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT H T J III HEATING & A/C 20294 375.00 • BROWN,HARPER,BURNS,6 HENIISCH 20295 9894.18 • HAWKINS TRAFFIC SAFETY 20296 381.09 t HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY 20297 2615.09 • HINKLEY d SCHMITT 20298 25.63 GARY HOFFARTH 20299 45.00 s I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST 20300 2141.31 • IKON BUSINESS SYSTEMS 20301 293.23 s INTERNATIONAL TOOL'S 20302 190.18 s J & R LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 20303 449.28 s JON'S FLAG SHOP, INC. 20304 282.89 • KACHINA ENGINEERING 20305 5930.00 • STEVE KARVELOT 20306 312.00 ; VICKI LYNN KASAD 20307 101.00 • MILO K. KEITH 20308 1740.00 • RONALD F. KIRCHNER 20309 100.97 s KOBATA ASSOCIATES, INC. 20310 4614.11 s LAKE ELSINORE AUTO PARTS 20311 6859.76 s CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 20254 63456.05 • CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2023S 391.28 s LAKE ELSINORE FLORIST & CIF7 20312 65.65 » LAKE ELSINORE MATERIALS 20313 16.01 • 3 CENDA ITEM NO. PA E._OF LAKE ELSINORE )EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. 4 DATE 08/15/90 PAYEE - DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D MV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT LAKE ELSINORE TRAVEL SERVICE 0246 364.00 * LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 0314 49.50 * MAYHALL PRINT SHOP 2031S 91.92 * METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICES 20316 58.00 * RON MOLENDYK 0237 399.99 * MOTOROLA, INC. 20317 523.50 * MR. TIRE SERVICE 20318 30.50 * N.B.S./ LONRY 20319 77286.51 * NATIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSIEM 203PO 495.00 * NATIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 20321 83.75 * THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 20322 398.88 * PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY, I zoesl 29607.59 * BILL PAYNE 0323 54.74 * THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 20324 228.40 * PRICE SECURITY SYSTEMS 20325 831.25 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 20326 263.12 * PSOMAS 8 ASSOCIATES 20327 2900.00 * LINDA PTOLEMY 203e8 41.80 * PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE. SY 0244 2193.92 * PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE. SY 0245 18882.08 QUADRANT SYSTEMS INCORPORAT 0329 250.00 QUILL CORPORATION 0330 157.17 AGEP IDA ITE NO. PAGE OF LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. 5 DATE 08/15/90 HER PAYEE DETAILOFDEMANDSPRESENTED WARRANTCHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. AMOUNT N0, AMOUNT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FEDERAL 20331 2766.56 * COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 20332 131822.35 * COIS BYRD, SHERIFF 20333 109.58 * COIS BYRD, SHERIFF 20236 108.38 * SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 20334 48.57 * SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK 2033S 53.31 * SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK 20336 399.26 * SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK 20337 74.60 * SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK 20338 92113.47 * SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVICE 20339 3330.00 * SHAMROCK SALES d SERVICE 20340 69.26 * WARREN SIECKE 20341 300.00 * SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC. 20342 433.1.1 THE SIZZLER RESTAURANT 2024 ; 1700.00 SUN TRIBUNE 20343 34.74 * RUDY SOLIS 20344 484.66 * SUSAN SORIA 20345 736.00 * SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 203461 2526.34 * SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 20347 10.40 * SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 20249 1003.03 * SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 20eso 800.98 * SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 20345: 46.24 * uGEr4 ;A 1TE1 195'._ :. E--5 --- r -.-S_ __ LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. DATE 08/15/90 ER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'O INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT STANDARD INSURANCE 20243 1130.99 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 20129 711.99 o STEVE'S AUTO PARTS 0349 2411.19 s STOCKWELL 3 BINNEY 203SO 1331.47 * STRUCTURAL TERMITE & PEST 20351 200.00 0 TEMECULA VALLEY PERSONNEL 20352 1800.00 * THOMAS TEMPS 20353 4758.70 * RUSSELL TOURVILLE CONSTRUCTI 203S4 28027.21 * U. P. S. 2035S 86.11 * VON'S GROCERY STORE 20129 60.00 * RICHARD WATENPAUGH 0356 100.00 * WEST COAST WINDOW CLEANING 203S7 665.00 * WEST PUBLISHING CO. 203S8 67.80 * WESTLAKE MEDICAL GROUP 203S9 52.00 * RAY WOOD ASSOCIATES 20360 3675.00 * ZEE MEDICAL 20361 1406.54 * ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 20362 2727.85 * WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 20363 13079.00 * MIKE DANIELSON 20252 250.00 * SUPPLY INFORMATION WAREHOUSE 0364 3187.19 * SMART 3 FINAL 20365 176.04 * TORRANCE LOSS CONTROL CORP. 20366 135.00 ACE A fTE N0. AGE 01 LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. DATE 08/15/90 :HER 0. PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT SCREEN MASTERS 20236 80.06 * ALL AMERICA HEATING 3 COOLIN 2036 2252.36 * BRYSKAR BUSINESS SERVICES 20368 130.00 * HOWARD WHITE 20092 121.00 * NANCY TORN 20369 21.25 * SPORTS PINS 20370 774.16.3--- •, THE HOSE PROS 20371 102.27. /128.38 NATIONAL PEN CORP. 20372 R \595.00 RONALD BARLASS 20373 SONDRA WARNEKE 20374 20.00 KEN CHANCELLOR 20375 7.SO CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES 2037 225.00 DANA POINT RESORT HOTEL 203T7 /118.80 THE HEMET NEWS 20378 309.60 • AGE DA ITEI41 NO. -.3 PAGF.,� OF LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-021 PAGE NO. 8 DATE 08/15/90 4ER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT WRITTEN 459276.16 REPAID 159212.66 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 618488.82 RECAP BY FUND RE -PAID RITTEN GENERAL FUND 100 125637.07 238646.29 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPE DISTR 130 32376.80 13580.94 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS F201 .00 2900.00 STORM DRAIN CAPITAL PROD 211 .00 1740.00 PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FU 221 .00 31355.58 A.D. 87-2 DEBT SERVICE F 351 .00 92113.47 L.E.T.S. FUND 450 1198.79 1653.37 OTHER FUNDS 999 .00 77286.51 AGEDA ITE i i I NO. PAGE � OF REPORT" TO CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE CALIFORNIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS PREPARED BY:_ APPROVED BY; CF�4EV�� > LT. W.H.CALDWELL RON MOL RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY MANAGER SHERIFF'S DEPT. BACKGROUND: Riverside CAL -ID has been serving law enforcement throughout Riverside County since 1986. With the development of the Riverside/San Bernardino Regional CAL -ID Remote Area Network (R.A.N.), the law enforcement agencies in both counties have realized increased criminal identifications due to the use of a joint fingerprint database. With the advent of new technologies, such as DNA identification and automated electronic photography, the potential for identifying suspects increases dramatically. Additionally, for the most part, these identifications represent suspects that would otherwise go unidentified. SUMMARY: In January 1990, the Riverside CAL -ID R.A.N. Board acted to broaden the scope of the CAL -ID mission to include the current identification technologies provided by DNA (CAL -DNA) and electronic color photo imaging (CAL -PHOTO). With the broadening of this mission, CAL -ID will be providing DNA laboratory service with a fully operational date targeted for the second fiscal quarter FY91/92. Additionally, CAL -ID is conducting a pilot study targeted at implementing a Region -wide "mug shot" photo imaging system with a goal of fielding such a system to the existing CAL -ID Network. At the Riverside CAL -ID R.A.N. Board's direction, the Regional CAL -ID relationship between Riverside and San Bernardino Counties was expanded to include all identification systems. This allows the Regional CAL -ID system, at the Board's direction, to implement DNA, PHOTO, and other new "people" identification technology that emerges. This new contract expands CAL -ID's responsibilities in serving you. The letter sent the City Manager in February 1990 identified the city of Lake Elsinore's total costs for FY90/91. These costs were based upon the most current California Department of Finance population figures as of 12/26/89. The assessment has not changed. The contract does not result in any additional costs to the city. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has approved this contract and has authorized the Chairman of the Board to sign for the County upon city councils approval. FISCAL IMPAC% $8,935.00 --(which is included in the FY90/91 budget) RECOMMENDATION; Authorize the Mayor to sign the contract and transmit to the Riverside County Sheriff's Department the original and two copies. AGENDA ITEM NO--. - PAGE --I- OF - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 III M>v 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .LIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 IOTH STREET XTRSIDE. CALIFORNIA AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE CALIFORNIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS THIS CONTRACT is entered into by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereafter called the "COUNTY"„ and the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, hereafter called the 'CITY". RECITALS WHEREAS, a region composed of the area of the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino has been formed for implementation and operation of Identification Systems. WHEREAS, the costs of the Regional System will be allocated to the users within the aforesaid Counties on the basis of fifty percent (50%) for the San Bernardino County area and fifty percent (50%) for the COUNTY area; and WHEREAS, there will be costs for implementation and operation of a regional system to be located in either Riverside or San Bernardino Counties and a local subsystem to be located in COUNTY; and WHEREAS, a local RAN Board has been established for the area of COUNTY compromised of the following members: A member of the Board of Supervisors, the Sheriff, the District Attorney, the Chief of Police of the City having the largest number of sworn personnel, a Chief of Police selected by all other police chiefs within the County and a Mayor selected by the City Selection Committee; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CITY desire to enter into an agreement for the implementation and operation of Identification Systems for the benefit of the citizens of their jurisdictions; E AGENDA ITEM NO. —__toL IF PAGE I OF_( 7 8 9 to 11 12'. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I'd -LIAM C. KATZENSTEIr COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 30D 3535 -10TH STREET NERSIDE. CALIFORNIA NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and stipulations hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. CITY agrees to be a user of the Identification Systems established for the areas of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. CITY'S use of the System under this agreement shall be through the local subsystem for the COUNTY area. 2. it is agreed that the total costs applicable to the COUNTY area for the Regional System which are not paid by the State and the total costs for the local subsystem within COUNTY which are not paid by the State shall be allocated to each user within COUNTY based on the users percentage of the total population of all users within the COUNTY. The population of the COUNTY for allocating COUNTY costs based on population shall be the population of the unincorporated area of the County. The population figures used for allocating annual costs to all users shall be the most recent State of California Department of Finance Population Estimates. The costs for the Regional System shall be consistent with the budgets approved by the Regional and Local RAN Boards. The costs for the local subsystem for the COUNTY area shall be consistent with the budget approved by the local RAN Board and the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY. COUNTY shall notify CITY in writing of its share of each fiscal year's budget upon approval of local and regional budgets. f E AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21, 22 23 24 25 26 27 M .LIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 LOTH STREET R'ERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 3, The Sheriff of the COUNTY shall be responsible for managing and operating the local subsystem within the COUNTY consistent with directions of the local RAN Board. The Regional RAN Board shall approve procedures and policies for operation and use of the Regional Identification Systems and the local RAN Board shall approve such for the local subsystem for the COUNTY area. All such procedures and polices shall be consistent with the technical requirements of the Regional System. 4. CITY shall pay the Auditor -Controller of COUNTY its share of costs for the fiscal year 1990/1991, by August 1, 1990, or within fifteen (15) days after the approval of the CITY'S budget whichever is later. The CITY'S share of costs for the fiscal year 1990/1991 (July 1990, through June 30, 1991) shall be based on the assumption that all cities in the county will participate in the program. CITY'S share of costs for the fiscal year 1990/1991 based on that assumption shall be $8,935.00. COUNTY'S Auditor -Controller shall subsequently adjust the billing to CITY based upon the actual participation of cities. For subsequent years, it is agreed that CITY shall pay its annual share of cost by August 1 st or within fifteen (15) days after approval of cities budget whichever is later. 5. Any amendments tot he agreement shall be in writing and approved by the parties before becoming effective. 6. The term of this agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall continue until terminated as hereinafter set forth. Either parry may terminate this agreement by giving notice of termination to the other party on or before February 1 of any year to terminate this: agreement as of the subsequent July 1st. 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. i ` PAGE OF—(*. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9', 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21' 22 23 24 25i M. 27 28 'LLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 LOTH STREET WERSIOE. CALIFORNIA 7. Any notices required to be given under this agreement shall be delivered in person or by first class mail to CITY'S Clerk of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors as may be applicable. 8. COUNTY'S Sheriff shall fiscally manage the funds and expenditures of the Identification Systems and establish a separately identifiable account for allocating costs pursuant to the terms of this agreement. Payments under this agreement shall be deposited in an interest bearing trust account with any earned interest being applied for expenses of the Identification Systems. 9. Any user of the System which is allowed to enter into program participation after the System has originally been implemented shall be required to pay its fair share of original start-up, implementation and equipment costs prior to participation in the System. Such fair share costs shall be based on the percentage of population of the user to the total population of all users and the amount of the costs shall be as determined by the local RAN Board for COUNTY area. 10. Each user of the Identification Systems within the COUNTY area shall be required to be a party to an agreement with the COUNTY setting forth obligations and responsibilities of users so that all such users are treated consistently and costs are allocated to all users based on their percentage of the population of all users within the COUNTY area of the Regional System. 11. COUNTY shall provide users with a financial report at the end of each fiscal year covering the costs for the COUNTY area portion of the Regional System and the local subsystem for said area consistent with regular COUNTY practices. 4 AGENDA ITEM. F; f PAGE S OF 0 _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 'LL IAM C. KATZENSTFIT COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 - 10TH STREET INERSIDE. CAUFORNIA 12. Any disputes over charges under this agreement will be resolved by the local RAN Board for the COUNTY area consistent with the terms of this agreement. 13. Each party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless form liability for acts or omissions of itself and its agents and employees in connection with the performance of this agreement. Dated: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By: Deputy (Seal) 1512 RMP:db 2/27/90 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors Dated: CITYOF By:_ Dated: Title: AGENDA ITEM NO. Lk i PAGE OF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: MACHADO PARK PROJECT NO. 221-4811 PREPARED BY:_/� APPROVED: Ray O'Donnell Ron Kirchner Senior Civil Engineer Director of Public Services APPROVED_ " G Ron Mo ndyk City Manager The Machado Park Improvement Project was included in the 1989/90 Fiscal Year Budget. It includes landscaping, irrigation and picnic shelters. FINDINGS Bids for this project were received on August 20, 1990. They are listed on attached sheet. Our review of the bid documents indicates that J & R Landscaping Company is a reputable contractor and is the lowest bidder. FISCAL IMPACT This project was funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for a budgeted amount of $188,000. $2,670 was expended for landscaping architectural design. Adequate funds are available for construction of this project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Accept the bid from J & R Landscaping Company for $151,353.60 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. AGENDA ITEM NO.- — PAGE I OF 2 _ LIST OF BEDS FOR MACHADO PARK J & R Landscape Riverside Mathis Construction Cucamonga Empire Landscape Riverside S & M Landscape Cunningham Davis Corp. Marina Contractors Artistic Landscape Pacific States Landscape Bopark Enterprises J. R. Wood $ 151,353.60 164,466.00 184,287.50 186,303.00 190,360.13 200,105.41 202,626.00 256,002.83 279,214.50 279,860.50 i AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE _2- OF -A. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: SHORELINE CLEAN-UP Prepared by: Dave Gunderman Approved Dave Gunderman Community Development Director DISCUSSION: by: ( i - on olendy-'k Citvy Manager With the lake level dropping more of the shoreline is being exposed and revealing a large amount of concrete, fencepost, and other underwater hazards. Due to the safety hazards the Code Enforcement Division has made contact with three (3) contractors for cost estimates on cleaning the lakeshore. (See Attached) Also, the State Park personnel will attempt to assist the City. There have been budgeting problems with the State, so assistance will be limited. Some of the items to be removed from the lakeshore are an old concrete gas dock, a number of round concrete pipes, steel fence posts, dead trees, and three concrete foundation walls. The items are within twenty feet of the water's edge and some items are in two feet of water. FISCAL IMPACT: It will be necessary to appropriate ($15,000.00) for this new project. The un -designated reserve funds to the Code Services RECOMMENDATION: fifteen thousand dollars source will be from the Enforcement/Professional It is recommended that the City approve the appropriation and authorize the Administrative Services Director to accept Greg Smith's proposal in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000.00) with the ability to authorize additional expenditures of up to four thousand ($4,000.00) in anticipation of unexpected items that will be found in the abatement process. hG�iO,y i c(r1 1vO. Pr: �c GREGORY K. SMITH P.O.BOX 527 WILDOMAR, CA 92395 P R O P O S A L AUGUST 3, 1990 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SO. MAIN LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 I HEREBY PROPOSE TO FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND MATERIALS NEEDED FOR THE LAKE FRONTAGE CLEAN-UP AS AS SET FORTH BY CATHERINE DINON IN CODE ENFORCEMENT. I PROPOSE TO DO THIS WORK FOR THE SUM OF ELEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($11,000.00). THANK YOU, GREGORY K. SMITH ftECE1VEl f' �r 3199D Det pj Uld". ?, gafety AGENDA ITEtd N0. (O FAGE_,&._OF _ Wrecking 6 Lend Clearing 22141 Lopez Street Parris, California 92370 (714) 657-9144 PROPOSAL and CONTRACT Lie. No. C21-257716 Date July 26 ,19gQ_ To City of Lake Elsinore Ruildirm & Safety inn S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore Ca-3124 Telephone Dear Sir: _ I propose to famish all materials end perform 811 labor necessary to complete the following: All of the above work to be Completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner socording to standard practices forthesumofTMtelve thousand four hundred Dollars (s 12t400.0-0 , Payments to be made On I^.m—1 pti Mn as the work progresses to the value of rano httnA rer� per cent ( I QQ_%) of NI work Computed. The entire amount of contract to be paid within days after completion. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or 18bor will only be executed upon written orders for some, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this Contract, All agreements must be made in writing. "NOTict to OWNEr' 1s er 701 .1 tiara' Mv) ir+d•r IM M•chw+ia' Lien L•r. Nr snn•aer, •Nt•n•nn•n •r •Nor Mro ere MW w Mnr •r+d is ref Mid ter Mr Woe, wviwr M ++ a •nbw Air el•irn p•ir•t Ave Mprry. ratter rl+r Mw, Av rr+•r MIM Avr••N •a•iNt r, iter^ e•^^+'ri.q r+rt + k of MIrM•++++re Mn N we esu'+•f +•orewm•n+ of a M";(ul h eased•' of ria Gerry arae' irwnd •rad nswri•e rn•t • fOnnKer'e en ffl bo wen Mn. 4id bond "t, ire n •• we•rd rr i•nr fl0::i •f dee A"n Wr .rid deli. M e dnrrll ter rti ••rf•'M•nw of ria snn•a, bo r a•yrn•nr M tvlY. I •f • ti"M, of all MrMnr fVjx% _•Ovtprl+•nl Or w•n118ir ter rirr e. �W n Respectfully submittad, By William F W01 I, Aeere•• 714-657-9144 TNeO�ieM State License No. _52216 Contracts" are requlsd by 1111Wanaa r to be iod and regulated by Ow Csntraslen' ft% Lim" My question conoeming a sontraetor Easy be taferrad b 0n registrar of the beard aA o addem it Contractors, tttab UoWW heard O 1020 N ttt►aat iacrantanb, CaNfontla lits{ ACCEPTANCE O you are hereby authorized to famish ell materials and labor squired to Complete the in the above proposal, for whits agree to pay the amount mentioned in said the terms thereof. - a ing to ACCEPTED Date 19_ AC_".J ; iTEtd NO, la x== CONSTRUCTION • MOMENANCE • ENGINEERING w•• 2 W WASHINGTON, MURRIETA. CA 02362 WULMGPF ADDRESS: EE ((714) P.O.T7-i�1G iFFAAX (/URRM-0 � 02362 To: City of lake Elsinore Date: 7-11-90 130 !Bain St. Lake Elsinore, Ca.92330 Subject: Lakeshore clean up Attn. Ms. Catherine Dimon. We propose to furnish labor, equipment and supervision to complete the following: 1. Remove fencing & fenc:epost and haul away. $ 4,627.00 2. Demolish, remove, and haul away launch ramps and concrete structures. $12,578.00 •3. Demolish, remove and haul away docks, etc. $ 3,100.00 4. General Clean up of shoreline as discussed in walk-thru. $ 3,581.00 5. Mobilization $ 693.00 For the lump sum price of: 24,579.00 Conditions: 1. Permits or engineering will be extra. 2. Handling of unforseen unsuitables or hazardous materials will be extra. 3. Payment in full requested at end of project. Ac�d by.P W.J Rol�< R.J. Lovingier Inc. AGENIDA ITEM NO. W U' -Z_y OF l . I iz,- y k f � _ _ SC✓ 4�\ Y _ 1 �� Y •A_. l . I I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN STOP INTERSECTIONS PREPARED BY: APPROVED: Ron Kirchner Ron blend ) / Director of Public City Manager Services BACKGROUND Staff has been studying the traffic and safety conditions of Chaney Street near the intersection of Sumner Avenue. Several signing improvements have been installed to alert the southbound motorist to the sudden change in vertical and horizontal alignment near the intersection of Sumner Avenue. SUMMARY Recent studies conclude that it is desirable to stop the northbound traffic at the intersection of (west leg) Sumner Avenue for the safety of the motorist, pedestrians and adjacent property. FISCAL IMPACT Minimal RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution. AG7 'k ITEM NO. o� A� ...._ RESOLUTION 90-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATING THE LOCATIONS OF CERTAIN STOP INTERSECTIO WHEREAS, Section 10.16.030 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code provides for the designation of stop intersections by resolution of the City Council upon the making of certain findings; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the placement of stop signs at the intersections listed below is necessary to facilitate the: flow of traffic and or prevent traffic conflicts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore that the intersections set forth below are hereby designated as stop intersections and the Director of Public Services is hereby directed. to place and maintain stop signs at one or more entrances to said intersections as herein specified, and that this Resolution shall take effect upon the placement of said signs. Street Name Cross Street Sign Facing Chaney Street Sumner Ave (west leg) South PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 28th day of August, 1990, upon the following vote: AYES: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CL'ERR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY GARY WASHBURN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO.�_ PAGE OF� REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: TRUCK ROUTE RESOLUTION PREPARED BY: APPROVED: Ron Kirchner Ro olendD Director of Public City Manager Services The State Vehicle Code recognizes the need to limit truck traffic from willfully using certain streets in a community, particularly in residential areas. our Municipal Code likewise provides for the establishment of truck routes throughout the City by Council Resolution. FINDINGS Staff in consultation with our traffic engineer has developed the truck routes shown in Exhibit A. All trucks over three tons must remain on these routes, except to depart on the most direct route to their destination. The state highways will effectively become a part of this system although we do not have control thereof. FISCAL IMPACT Cost of sign installation is unknown at this time. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution. (Exhibit B). AGENDA ITEM NO.�Q� PAGE OF� m x x co m AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE --'_Or-�-- RESOLUTION 90-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN SHTREETS WITHIN THE CITY AS TRUCK ROUTES WHEREAS, Section 35701 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 10.24.010 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code authorizes that the City Council may designate certain streets as truck routes, and; WHEREAS, it has been determined designated truck route sheets is of truck traffic within the City, pavement that the establishment of said necessary for the proper control and to minimize damage to street NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby designates established the following streets as truck routes and establishes the following restrictions relative thereto: 1. Truck Routes Lake St/Robb Road: Lakeshore Dr.: Collier Ave: Spring Street: Spring Street: Lakeshore Dr: Limited Street: Short Street Sumner Ave: Main Street: Lakeshore Dr.: Railroad Canyon Rd Mission Trail: Mission Trail: Corydon Road: I-15 Freeway to Lakeshore Drive Robb Road to Riverside Drive Central Street to Spring Street Collier Street to Limited Street Limited Street to Lakeshore Dr. (Southbound only) Spring Street to Short Street (Eastbound only) Spring Street to Main Street (Westbound only) Lakeshore Drive to Limited (Northbound only) Spring Street to Main Street Sumner Avenue to I-15 Freeway Short Street to Railroad Canyon Road Lakeshore Drive to East City Limits Railroad Canyon Rd. to Malaga Road Malaga Road to Corydon Street (Southbound only) Mission Trail to Union Street (Westbound only) 2. No person shall operate or park any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of three (3) tons on any street or portion thereof within the City except for those streets herein designated as truck routes. 3. The vehicle weight restrictions established herein shall not be effective for any of the following: A. Vehicles subject to the provisions of Section 1031=1036 inclusive of the Public Utilities Code. B. Vehicles owned by a public utility or a licensed contractor while necessarily in use in the construction, installation, or repair of any public utility. EXHIBIT B A _,ENDA ITEM NO.. 1K. pAG.E O.O— AAGE a OF.�-. C. Commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress or egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has been previously obtained. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Services is hereby directed to post signs along the above stated locations identifying said designated truck routes. The provisions of this Resolution shall not be effective until and unless appropriate signs are erected identifying designated truck routes. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED AYES: COANCILMEMBERS: NOES: COIJNCIL14EMBERS: ABSENT: CODNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY GARSHBURN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO.. Irw PAGEL OF� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE August 28,1990 TO: Council Members in Session FROM: Fred Christensen, Consultant Special Projects - Annexation SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PREZ.ONING AND REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE AN ANNEXATION INFORMATION PROGRAM At your regular meeting of August 7, 1990, your Council approved a resolution making the City of Lake Elsinore the applicant of Annexation No. 56 (the Marinita-Ortega-Meeker annexation.) That annexation, as your Council is aware, is critical to the approval of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District and its accompanying Community Facilities District. .As I indicated in the memorandum accompanying that resolution, a follow-up action involves a request to the Local Agency Formation Commission to waive the requirement to prezone certain inhabited territory which is, to all intents and purposes built out, and for which no General Plan or specific zoning chanes would be contemplated should the annexation be successful. In order for the Formation Commission to consider the Marinita- Ortega-Meeker. Annexation (Annexation No. 56), Commission staff has indicated the desireability of also filing an annexation to include this inhabited territory which would otherwise become at.. unincorporated island surrounded by the City. We are aware that the City of Lake Elsinore has experienced opposition to annexation from the inhabited territory. We feel that the opposition may, at least in part, be based on a lack of information available to the residents and property owners in the area. Consequently, we are recommending that your Council authorize preparation and mailing of a letter to all postal patrons Mtbiti the area explaining the process of annexation; the City's intent to initiate an annexation of that area; and the benefits that would accrue to residents and property owners as the result of the annexation. We are also recommending that, following the transmittal of the letter referred to above, at leas: one forum be scheduled at a location convenient to the residents and property owners of the subject territory to allow for input from the residents and property owners, answer any questions they may have, and provide them with an opportunity to express their concerns or opinions with respect to the proposal. We are requesting concurrence from your Council with respect to this recommendation as well. AGENDA ITEM NO. q PAGE OF August 20, 1990 Re: Request for Prezone Waiver and Authorization for Annexation Information Program Page 2 Assuming approval from your Council, it is our intention, following implementation of the information program, to bring to your Council documents to permit the adoption of a Resolution of Application for the annexation of this territory so that a filing can be submitted to the Formation Commission and the proposed Annexation No. 57 can be processed by the Commission. Respectfully submitted, CHRISTENSEN & WALLACE, INC. Consultant to the City of Lake Elsinore: for Annexation Projects By. arcus . ristensen President and Principal Consultant AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF -'A, �w 1f. XS a a a J IL 44 > W C W V 0 Ic W df < Z K W 0 C 0 ki C7 0 V LL a J AGENDA ITEM NO---I� i PAGE Z OF --S- W N a a a J IL 44 > W C W V 0 Ic W df < Z K W 0 C 0 ki C7 0 V LL a J AGENDA ITEM NO---I� i PAGE Z OF --S- i MK11 L34 '+ M M M H M M M M M M M n M X13 R N a 9 8 7 G S 4 3 z I X33 MIG 0 1: L MI UWAla� '� it SSS /o t W71 t �1tttiE1 (I Kff'M"f✓'" LI 4 1-37- M3 M4 vMM 6 7 L41 DO W ►� Al air MhIN IZ g I4 _q L 31 M2 t37 !1y ! L F L LI! tlu7 IJ45 N44 N43 r/iz !� N31 W2 LID lt8 I L'I"I I v V Nsi'o7ltf✓ i t 14 i MK11 L34 '+ M M M H M M M M M M M n M X13 R N a 9 8 7 G S 4 3 z I X33 MIG 0 1: L MI 4 1-37- M3 M4 vMM 6 7 M 8 MMM 9 air MhIN IZ g I4 M L 31 M2 N39 IJ45 N44 N43 r/iz r✓36 N31 A/0 w A'''O i✓33 n/34 /✓3S ,✓z8 nt�' 551 S (57138 59 Z S IS3I5ZIS/I5�I49 4 47 \ GS M'ocS".✓ i ! 139925 //OOMlFO Cisr AA Mir' S;z 93 1 se I s( AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE yL OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY CENTER ROOFING/STUCCO Prepared byeIti hard J. / Appyoved B4 }/ wa enpaugh blen' y , Community Services Director City Manager BACKGROUND As a part of the ongoing renovation of the Lake Community Center, staff has received quotes to reroof the entire facility and have the exterior walls sandblasted, patched, and color coated. For the roofing portion of the project, staff contacted four contractors with two submitting proposals: Desert Valley Construction, and Russell Tourville Construction. The same process was followed for the restucco portion of the project with three proposals being received: Harrington & Sons; Southwest Stucco, Inc.; and Russell Tourville Construction. FISCAL IMPACT The approved Capital Improvement Budget for the Lake Community Center is $70,000 for this year. The apparent qualified low bidders for the two projects are: Reroof - Desert Valley Construction $16,344 Stucco - Harrington & Sons 13.000 $29,344 The total for the roofing and stucco portions of the renovations total $29,344, leaving a balance of $40,656 to complete the remaining items: railings, storage area, and restroom improvement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council approve the apparent low bidders for the roofing and restucco portions of the Lake Community Center renovation project and authorize staff to execute the contracts. ACENDA I i Eh", e:C. 0 PACE_Y`OF_ .�j CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Watenpaugh, Community Services Director FROM: David W. Sapp, Community Services Managerf� DATE: August 17, 1990 SUBJECT: Bids to Stucco Lake Community Center Attached are three price quotes received to restucco the Lake Community Center as part of the FY 1990-91 Capital Improvement Project Program. Each contractor was requested to bid on sandblasting (hydroblast), patching, and hand apply the color coat on the facility. Based on those items only, the lowest bidder is "Harrington & Sons" in Lake Elsinore at $13,000. The bids received are as follows: Harrington & Sons $13,000 Southwest Stucco, Inc. $16,500 Tourville Construction $36,500 /mj C. Bill Payne, Community Services Parks Manager AGENDA ITEM NO.___[D_, PACE OF_ l CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Watenpaugh, Community ices Director FROM: Bill Payne, Parks Manager �- DATE: August 14, 1990 SUBJECT: Community Center Roof Repair On July 26th I met with contractors at the Community Center to discuss the scope of work for the re -roofing of the Center. Of the (four contractors I spoke with, Desert Valley Construction and Russell-Tourv111-9�ons�ruction were the only ones to submit a proposal. Attached are the proposals submitted by both Desert Valley Construction ($16,344), and Russell Tourville Construction ($46,720), along with a certificate of insurance from Desert Valley. I feel confident after talking with Desert Valley Construction in awarding them the contract for the job. If you agree, I will proceed with the work. /mj C. Dave Sapp, Community Services Manager AGENDA ITEM NO.- 10_ PAGE OFA CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: AWARD OF BIDS/CAPITAL EQUIPMENT Prepared by: q �RQTApproved By: /L Rich rd J. WhtehpaughMolen, k Community Services Director City Manager BACKGROUND The following capital equipment has been authorized for purchase in this year's budget: 3 5-10 Pick-ups 1 Tractor Mower 1 Dump Truck 1 Loader The bid prices, noted below, were received at the bid opening held August 14, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Clerk's office. S-10 Pick-ups Lakeside Chevrolet 3 each @ $11,046.49 = $33,139.47 (accept) Quality Chevrolet 3 each @ $11,093.72 = $33,281.17 MacHoward Leasing 3 each @ $11,457.48 = $34,372.43 De Anza Chevrolet 3 each @ $11,511.65 = $34,534.95 Tractor Mower AA Equipment, John Deere #2155 2WD = $16,767,82 (accept) Case Power & Equipment, Case 380B = $17,485.00 Dump Truck Lakeside Chevrolet, Chevrolet 5/6 Yd = $37,050.79 (accept) Pressley Peterbilt/GMC GMC 5/6 Yd = $38,003.00 Dieterich International Intl 5/6 Yd = $38,069.31 Front Loader Case Power and Equip., Case Model 621 L = $63,356.00 (accept) Johnson Machinery, Caterpillar 926 L = $69,570.04# Staff is requesting Council's approval of the bid prices for each of the items as marked. * An apparent error in the bid price. Even with correction, Caterpillar would not be the low bidder. FISCAL IMPACT This year's budget allowed $193,000 to purchase capital equipment. The current request totals $150,314.08. This will leave a balance of $42,685.92 to purchase two remaining vehicles; one Lumina, and one Caprice. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council approve the award of bids and authorize the purchase of the equipment as outlined in the report. AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGE OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: DEVELOPER FEES FOR PARKS AND RECREATION Prepared b P Y: Approved Ric and J. Wat npaugh Ron' olen(iyk Community Services Director City Manager/ LETS General Manager BACKGROUND The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, in 1977, adopted Ordinance No. 572 and Resolution No. 77-39 which established a Park Capital Improvement Fund and standards for dedication of land and/or the payment of fees for the establishment of Park and Recreation facilities in the City of Lake Elsinore. The ordinance provides for a review of the dedication and fee standard on yearly basis to assure its adequacy as it relates to the community. Based on review of the current dedication standard and the adopted fee in -lieu schedule, related to other areas and the market place, staff would not recommend a fee adjustment. Staff is however, reviewing the potential of developing a square footage fee for commercial and industrial facilities. Several cities have successfully applied this concept to commercial and industrial facilities based on the percentage of City development these specific zones make up. With the completion and adoption of the City's General Plan, staff should have sufficient support data to meet the requirements of AB1600. The only item needing adjusting at this time is the Parkland Dedication Formula in Resolution No. 89-44. In Table I, the average density per dwelling unit should be adjusted to meet our General Plan: Single Family 3.22 Dens./D.U. Duplex, Medium Low 2.71 Dens./D.U. Apartment/Condo 2.20 Dens./D.U. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council approve the density dwelling unit adjustment and adopt the attached Resolution No. amending Resolution No. 77-39, adjusting the average density dwelling unit in Table I. per per RESOLUTION NO. IV 0� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY AMENDING SECTION 4 OF RESOLUTION 89.44, ADOPTED ON AUGUST 29, 1989, THE PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 572, REQUIRING THE DEDICATION OF LAND AND/OR THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California adopted Ordinance No. 572 on July 25, 1977, providing for the dedication of land or the payment of in lieu fees to the Park Capital Improvement :Fund; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is desirous of establishing and providing a sufficient number of park and recreational facilities for the people of the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to have residential developers provide their fair share of costs and/or land for the development of park and recreational facilities within the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review of Section 4 of Resolution No. 77-39, concerning the Park Capital Improvement Fund, has determined that an amendment to said fee schedule is necessary. AGENDA ITEM N0. ' PAGE_A1�_OF_S_ NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California that Section 4 of Resolution No. 77-39, is hereby deleted and the following shall be the regulations for Determining Land Dedications and Fee Exactions for the Establishment of Park and Recreation Areas in the City of Lake Elsinore, California: SECTION ONE The above recitals are true and correct. SECTION TWO REOUIREMENTS. Land or fees required under this resolution shall be conveyed or paid directly to the City of Lake Elsinore. The City, in accepting such land or funds, shall develop the land or use the funds as herein provided: A. Establishment and Development Time. Any fees collected under this resolution shall be committed within five (5) years after the payment of such fees or issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If such fees are not committed, they shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of their lot bears to the total area of all lots within the subdivision. B. Land Disposition. In the event that opportunities for better recreation facilities than those provided by the dedication materialize, the land so dedicated may be sold with the proceeds therefrom being used for suitable park and recreation facilities which serve the neighborhood in which that subdivision is located. C. Standards for Dedication. The City Council hereby establishes a ratio of five (5) park acres to one thousand (1,000) population. AGENDA ITEM NO.�_ PACE. _OF _ D. Notification. All reasonable measures are to be taken to inform developers of the requirements of this resolution so that they will make allowances for the dedication of land and/or the payment of fees as required. SECTION THREE. SUBDIVISIONS OVER FIFTY (50) PARCELS. For any subdivisions over fifty (5) parcels, the subdivider/developer shall dedicate land or pay an in -lieu fee equal to the fair market value of the land that would have otherwise been dedicated. The formula for determining the amount of land to be dedicated is as follows: Average number of persons per unit X number of units proposed -- by park acreage standard (1,000 people) (5 acres park land) The fair market value of the property shall be determined by an appraiser obtained at the! developer(s)/subdivider(s)' expense and approved by the City Council. PARKLAND DEDICATION FORMULA TABLE TABLE I Types of Dwellings Single -Family Duplex, Medium -low Apartments/Condos Average Density/DU 3.22 2.71 2.20 AGENDA {TEM NO. I i PAGE__ 4_ F_ S _ _ SECTION FOUR. Subdivisions under fifty (5) Parcels, Apartments, Condominiums, Fourolexes, Triplexes, Duplexes, and Single -Family_ Residences. All subdivisions under fifty (50) parcels, apartment, condominium, fourplex, triplex, duplex, and single-family residence developments shall pay the following fees to the City of Lake Elsinore for the purpose of establishing, improving, and maintaining parkland within the City: 1. Single -Family Residence $1,600 per unit 2. Duplexes $1,500 per unit 3. Triplexes $1,500 per unit 4. Fourplexes $1,450 per unit 5. Apartments $1,400 per unit SECTION FIVE. Timing. All provisions for land dedication shall be made at the tentative map stage in the case of subdivisions over fifty (50) parcels, and shown on the final map. In the case of subdivisions under fifty (50) parcels, apartment, condominium, fourplex, triplex, duplex, and single-family residence developments, all fees must be made prior to obtaining any permits from the Building Division. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 1990, upon this 28th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: Gary Washburn, Mayor AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE_,,_OF A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 11th day of September, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following: PROJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26326 = BROOKSTONE DEVELOPMENT, INC. A request to consider Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide approximately 20.4 acres into 26 lots. LOCATION: This project is located on the northwest corner of Collier and Central Avenues. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication to the City Council. For further particulars, all interested persons are invited to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding this matter is on file and available for ublic inspection. rl _ DATE: August 16, 1990 SIGNED _�.. ✓,:�.ot�(, VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK PLEASE PUBLISH ON: August 22, 1990 AGENDA REM NO. ✓, O�• PAGE,_„ OFA_ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Man 26142• South Lake Estates,• a request for approval of a 114 lot single-family subdivision. PREPARED BY: �-- ^�O APPROVED BY: Dave Gunderman Saied Naaseh Dave Gunderman Associate Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. APPROVED BY: 41e k City Manager BACRGROIIND On August 1, 1990 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-12 and to approve Tentative Tract Map 26142 by a 4-0 vote. DISCUSSION Subsequent to the Planning tract map the applicant has m Staff has concluded that 1 compliance with the tentative Commission. Commission review of the tentative ade a few modifications to the map. :hese changes are in substantial tract map reviewed by the Planning The modifications include total number of lots, total number of buildable lots and the circulation pattern. After these changes the revised map still meets the minimum requirements of the Zoning and the Subdivision Ordinances and in staff's opinion they enhance the project. The average lot size has decreased from 8,245 to 8,158 square feet. The total number of lots has increased by one (1); however, since one of the lots eliminated was an open space lot the total number of buildable lots has increased by two (2). The circulation patterns have been modified in two (2) sections of the subdivision. The southeast corner cul-de-sac ("C" Street, Exhibit "A") has been modified to a "knuckle" ("C" Street, Exhibit "B") to better accommodate the sewer and drainage easements that run through Lots 55 and 56 (Exhibit "A"). This alteration increases the number of lots from 113 to 114. The other revision is in the southwest corner of the project and it involves the elimination of "H" Street (Exhibit "A") and the creation of two (2) cul-de-sacs. This alteration was made to eliminate the open space lot (Lot 113, Exhibit A) which was not large enough for dedication to the City as a park site and was conditioned to be added to the abutting properties. This Condition (Condition No. 41) has been deleted due to the redesign of the project. Condition No. 43.a. has been added to the Conditions reviewed by the Planning Commission and reads as follows: "Lot Number 69 shall be redesigned to be at least 7,700 square feet in area." AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 2 August 28, 1990 Subject: Tentative Tract Map 26142: South Lake Estates RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-12 and approve Tentative Tract Map 26142 based on the Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The project meets the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and R-1 Zoning Standards. 2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's subdivision standards. 3. The proposal, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the area; therefore, it will not create any adverse effect on abutting properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for this type of density of development. 5. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant impact on the environment. 6. The revised Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the Tentative Tract Map reviewed by the Planning Commission. ACTN'DA ITEM No.4t-F-1 P;,G A I'�_ y �ao.nr+rrrY.rT f i S� !�^Fai♦ AGS. � E -i� r �d\ �sryerJ_nz1_�L.Ccl_ca_lami' � R! �R t All `fk v I 1 .1, Lill In UN i1+ Iti ;!7}jf-Aga 3n E' �k a �` ppp�at as 'Ik lkd.fib:k0iikp-:t- � •• •� ; =4 fes! PGia $SV- a3� h'� -±i_ y 3 -: � Vii• 'rl ki i y M EEj 2if r. o�r - Eq �i° ��t ack a � r ifi ^ S•E t i C a "S E �i ���� t 4y 66 i E i ii�=tE i 'if E~ EEigpsi o; Ek Et efE±f' Ct o Se RE 'e #�<r Ilk �Ik• 4i� i;S i`.R 8 e jr I5 \ O i = E_ IiE'^� a .. eiaE u'84d14 f Esti ! rrg"S Itgra R Ry J f-'-ia C Y' 2 ts ,� i • ��-h 6 , C --f 4 a x- IIrtIit S �t L- ` Lill AGENDA ITE,, NO. PM. 60/57 O a't0m 4� 11 ft a I4 I m— E AGENDA.' iTc".4 rJ.Q 01 d .,P.i 'b l� v ;Rif Alf i�j, iEf 13f j i V R = f is Fi f lil ilii til MOO +a is +a�1'si 60 7:' f f AGENDA.' iTc".4 rJ.Q 01 d .,P.i 'b l� v C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 Planning Division I. Tentative Tract Map 26142 is approved subject to the approval of Annexation Number 53 by LAFCO. 2. Tentative Tract Map will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 3. The Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. 4. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance. 5. Signage for this subdivision shall require City Permits. 6. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site preparation activity. 7. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Planning Division. S. All grading shall conform to the requirements of Section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. 9. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and grading for subject development as required by City Engineer and Chief Building Official. a) Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other improvements. 10. Pay all applicable fees in force at time of issuance of building permits. 11. Class II bicycle lane to be provided along Stoneman Avenue. 12. Prior to final approval of Tract Map 26142 the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or the bonds and agreement for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. 13. Prior to Final Tract Map approval by the City Council, all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the minimum dimensional standards of the R-1 Zoning District. 14. Rsior---tcs--€i�sab-appyova�--Pouide clsa3trace-aosegtaxee met# ers €ram-�d3acaat,--p•�ape-r-ty_�e�a. �e---be--�SP�oxted--�--�-he--E-rty Eagi-naar gad-qty-Attcrnay-a-nd-recorded, DELETE 15. Prior to Final Map approval, applicant shall obtain off-site slope easements for grading from adjacent property owners. Such easements shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded. 16. Final Map shall reflect plotting as approved on plans date stamped July 13, 1990. 17. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City Building Division. 18. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's civil engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. AGENDA ITEM No. 3 pG� rd C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED 19. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Department. 20. Provide fire buffer zone around entire tract perimeter and landscape for fire retardant and erosion control as required by the Riverside County Fire Department and the Community Development Director. 21. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 22. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 23. The developer shall submit plans to Southern California Edison for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 24. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. 25. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas Company. 26. Meet all requirements of General Telephone. 27. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation.. 28. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of this projectshall be subject to approval of the Community Development. Director. 29. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting District is required prior to approval of a Final Tract/Parcel Map. 30. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project prohibiting on -street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC & R's shall also include screening any ground base disk and no roof -mounted or front yard disk shall be allowed. It should also indicate that the project is within the Alquist-Priolo special studies zone. CC & R's shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, or his designee, prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC & R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed in the future. 31. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans, landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor Design Review approval prior to issuance of building permits. All standards of development and procedural steps in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal shall apply for this project. 32. A decorative block or masonry wall shall be constructed around the perimeter of the subdivision. Precise design, materials and location to be determined through Minor Design Review process. 33. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require the appropriate City Permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, AGEN:Nk ITEM NO_ s,--- A r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official and Planning Division. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 34. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval and shall be subject to further environmental review and project conditions in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. 35. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 36. Submit a comprehensive soils and geology report and grading plan. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet shall be provided. Submit details of grading plan phasing and erosion control measures. 37. All residences shall be served by a sidewalk along lot frontage. 38. All sidewalks shall be separated from curb with parkway which shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 39. Conceptual and Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans for all project slope areas and fire breaks shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of development. Improvements shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 40. Provide the following environmental mitigation measures: A. Liquefaction Mitigation Measures, Implementing Agency - Building/Safety Department: (Refer to Figure 3, Exploratory boring and trench location map, dated February 9, 1989 in the preliminary soil and foundation investigation report). 1. Provide at least five (5) feet of compacted fill under the bottom of footings for all structures. 2. All homes shall have post tensioned foundations and flexible gas line connections. 3. Alternatives to removal and recompaction of soils include compaction grouting, in-place densification,or a combination of a thin compacted fill blanket, drain rock fill and mat foundation. B. Backfill, Implementing Agency - Building/Safety Department: The exploratory trench backfill shall be removed and recompacted during site grading to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of the laboratory maximum dry density before placement of additional fill or structures. C. Setbacks for structures, Implementing Agency - Planning: A twenty-five (25) foot setback for human occupancy structures shall be established as delineated on Figure 6, Exploratory Trench Location Map, revised July 16, 1990. D. Final Map approval, Implementing Agency - Engineering: PAGE - OF -- - r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED 1. The building setback line shown on the Exploratory Trench Location Map, Figure 6, revised July 16, 1990, shall be delineated on the project Final Map. This area shall be: labeled "Fault Hazard Area". 2. The following shall be noted on the Final Map: - This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area. - Riverside County Geologic Report Number 739 was prepared for this property by Western Technologies in February 12, 1990 and is on file at the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County Planning Departments: The specific items of concern are surface fault rupture, liquefaction, seiching, flooding and uncompacted trench backfill. 3. Final Map shall be approved by the Riverside County Planning Department Engineering Geologist. 41. Final Map shall incorporate Lots 110 and 113 as one lot or applicant may grant said Lot 113 to adjacent property owners at applicant's discretion prior to final map approval. 42. An avigation easement shall be granted to the Skylark Airport. 43. Final Map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to satisfaction of the Postal Service and the Public works Department. Riverside County Fire Department 44. Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2 1/211) located one (1) at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for two (2) hours duration at 20 PSI. 45. Applicant/developer shall furnish one (1) copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered Civil Engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. 46. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) 47. This property is in the 1434 pressure zone with a maximum serviceable pad elevation of 1314. 48. Pay water and/or sewer connection fee per Resolution No. 971.5 prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance. 49. Submit hydraulic analysis to determine off-site sewer line sizing and on-site sewer facilities sizing to meet EVMWD Standards. 50. Submit hydraulic analysis to size on-site and/or off-site water lines to :meet River e County Fire Department requirements using fire�h w pl maximum day demand. r r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED 51. Design and construct: water and/or sewer line along entire project frontage and surrounding areas, to EVMWD Standards and Specifications. Water 1. Water mains to be extended from Tract 24139, adjacent at the southeast end of development. 2. A Hydraulic Analysis will dictate the tract's water main sizing requirements. Sewer 1. Logical sewer main extensions, eight (8) inch minimum. 2. Re-evaluate sewer system flows: to drain to Ontario Way and "B" Streets, and possibly eliminating sewer easement and system line and manhole at Lot Number 41. 3. Potential sewer easement problems to address; (existing at northern end of development): require continuous access, no slopes or dirt mounds, and driveway approaches within easement, reference: Lot Number 41. General 1. Pay-off Proportionate Assessment District 84-1 participation bonds. 52. Prepare a focused water and sewer Master Plan for this project. 53. Any off-site street improvement extensions require water and/or sewer line extensions within the new street. 54. All facilities must be designed and constructed at the owner/ developer's expense and to the current District's Standards Specifications and Master Plan. 55. The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District anticipates providing sanitary sewer service for the above referenced property based upon the completion of the 1 m.g.d. expansion of the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant. It is estimated that an additional 1 m.g.d. sewage treatment capacity will be available by July 1990. EVMWD has also programmed additional expansion of the treatment plant by currently preparing an EIR for the next phase of construction. By this condition of service the District expresses no warranties as to the availability of sewer service for the above referenced property of such time as applications for sewer service to the property are accepted or approved. Engineering Department 56. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map approval. 57. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 58. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on "A", "B", "D", "F", "G", and "H" Streets to provide for a sixty (60) foot right-of-way width and forty (40) foot curb -to -curb the full length of each street. ADEN^A TEM' NO ' - _ r OF PAG_ - r r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED 59. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 60. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 61. Construct all public work improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 62. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 63. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 64. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 65. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire: Department. 66. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans, as required by the City Engineer. 67. Lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 68. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 69. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 70. Developer shall provide necessary flood hazard protection and all lots shall be graded above 12671. Developer shall meet special flood protection requirements, building within lake perimeter streets (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 15.68). 71. Site development along the lake perimeter will require special grading and flood proofing requirements (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 15). 72. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the Municipal Code regarding flood hazard regulations. 73. Developer shall contribute $7,000 towards the design and construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue. This development will increase traffic at -the intersection at least 6% and should contribute 6% ($7,000) towards construction. 74. Contribute $290 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF 8'�- 9z�l /C_� r A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26142 CONTINUED 75. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds. 76. Applicant shall cooperate with developer of Tract 24139 and provide full street improvement on Ontario Way along the southerly boundary. 77. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street design recommendations. Provide final soils Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification. 78. No lot shall have ingress or egress to Stoneman Avenue. 79. Applicant shall obtain off-site drainage acceptance letters from affected adjacent property owners to be recorded prior to or with final map. 80. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by developer per City standard, tapes to be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. If at the time of Certificate of Occupancy no system has been established by the City, this condition shall be waived, and the Developer will pay a fee Of $1,000.00 per sheet for future final tract digitizing. 81. The developer shall pay for "No parking" and Street sweeping signs. 82. Utility companies shall approve their easements as to size and location on map prior to final map approval. 83. Grading, footings, foundation slabs and gas line connections shall meet requirements of the geotechnical report prepared by Aragon Geotechnical Consultants. 84. Wall along southwest boundary shall be adjacent to property line, concrete swale shall be on southeast side of wall. Boundary wall shall be provided with weep holes. 85. Drainage easements along southwest boundary shall be in private ownership except where drainage is from public right-of-way. 86. Developer shall provide sufficient dedication for a sixty-six (66) foot right-of-way (thirty-three (33) foot half -street) for Stoneman Avenue. 87. Stoneman shall be improved to a twenty-four foot roadbed (half -width) from centerline and a sloped AC parkway five (5) foot from property line subject to the approval of the City Engineer and permitting continued use as a storm drain channel. 88. Applicant shall annex to the City's Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District prior to final map approval. 89. No lotsshall front Stoneman Avenue. 90. Pad elevation of lots adjacent to Stoneman Avenue must meet the approval of Riverside County Flood Control District. ACzENDA ITEM; h0. PAGE_A_OF // i Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 3 ping drawings, of which this particular project, as I stated a ment ago, is how many are aware that there is a C -M one that 's right on the other side of the wall from this and Commis 'over Saathoff answered that in part. There ould be, even th gh you have left yourself the oppo unity for approval, at possibly if we came back with a location we would be fa d with the same consideration. There are also other comment through outs the documentwhich the City Attorney replie to, or stated that all this could be null and void if in f t the Community D elopment Director has determined that wit a Conditional a Permit a church could meet in M-1. It is also the MM to which the City Attorney included all. o these nsiderations given that the Conditional Use Permit co be granted if in fact it is compatible, as the state continues to be made. The compatibility, however, oe'sn t seem to be based on the condition at hand, but at Hutu conditions there might be. Chairman Brown cc ented on the let r from the owner of the property indica ng he would be will' g to remove all the inventory of 1 within the project so at the church could utilize the acility. Motion Commissioner Saathoff to deny Conditi al Use Permit 90-5 ased on the Findings listed in the Staff R ort, second by ommissioner Wilsey. proved 4-0 i 4. Tentative Tract Map 26142 - South Lake Estates Joint Venture (Continued from July 18, 1990) - Associate Planner Naaseh presented a request for approval of a 113 lot single-family subdivision on a 29.5 acre parcel, located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the existing City Limits. Associate Planner Naaseh request the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 14: Delete Condition No. 41 "Final Map shall incorporate Lots 110 and 113 as one lot or applicant may grant said Lot 113 to adjacent property owner at applicant's discretion prior to final map approval." Condition No. 73: "Developer shall contribute $7,000 towards the design and construction of a traffic 'signal at the intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at least six percent (6%) and should contribute six percent (6%) ($7,000)'towards construction." I Condition No. 87: "Stoneman shall be improved to a twenty- four foot roadbed (half -width) from centerline and a sloped AC parkway five- foot (51) from property line subject to the approval of the City Engineer and permitting continued use as a storm drain channel.° Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m., asking if there was anyone present wishing to speak in favor. ACIC-N 7A ITEM INO.-� PACE.& 19 OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 4 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED Mr. John Elmajian, Wesco Homes, representing South Lake Estates Joint Venture, stated that they are in agreement with the conditions of approval. Chairman Brown askedlif anyone else wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey asked if it is anticipated for Stoneman to be continued .through thel floodplain area. Community Development Director Gunderman responded in the negative. I Commissioner Wilsey then commented on the Class II bicycle requirement on Stoneman and whether or not this is sufficient, suggested that Dick Watenpaugh, Community Services, review this for a multi -use trail rather than just a bicycle path. Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 57, pertaining to water rights; condition number 80, if standards for digitizing have been developed, and if City Council is going to have an ordinance or policy to mandate. Commissioner Saathoffcommented on condition number 42, requesting clarification onlavigation easements; condition number 32, pertaining to decorative block or masonry wall around the perimeter of the subdivision --might have a problem with requiring this, but this comes back to Design Review. Commissioner Saathoff then commented on a general purpose trail on Stoneman within the'site itself rather than a Class II bicycle lane. What is between, in the developments, this development and Grand Avenue on Stoneman --has there been anything other than Class II 'required? Community Development Director Gunderman stated that he believes it has been Class II. Commissioner Saathoff stated that he would have a concern about the location of this particular tract map closer to the floodplain area and starting a general purpose trail and not having it between Grand Avenue and this map. Commissioner Wilsey stated that we have a half -street width that is being improved now, sowe have nothing that has happened on the other side, and if we call it to Mr. Watenpaugh's attention he can start to review that as those projects come in. Chairman Brown commented on the 40 -foot drainage easement running down the boundary and if there is any armoring, planting or erosion control! proposed within that 40 -feet; placing perimeter fencing onithe property line as opposed to the top of the slope; boundary wall section on the southeast side and if this is indicative of what would be the ten -foot easement. Discussion ensued on condition number 31 and 32, pertaining to landscaping, fencing and maintenance, and this coming back for Minor Design Review. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-12 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 26142 based on the Findings and subject to AGENDA ITEJi4o. PAGE_,iL- OF�— r Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 5 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26142 CONTINUED r the 90 Conditions of Approve listed in the staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 14: Delete Condition No. 41: "Final Map shall incorporate Lots 110 and 113 as one lot or applicant may grant said Lot 113 to adjacent property owners at applicant's discretion prior to final map approval." Condition No. 73: "Deieloper shall contribute $7,000 towards the design and construction of I a traffic signal at the intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at least six percent (6$) and should contribute six percent (6%) ($7,000) towards construction." Condition No. 87: "Stlneman shall be improved to a twenty-four foot roadbed (half - width) from centerline and a sloped AC !parkway five-foot (51) from property line subject to the approval of the City Engineer and permitting continued use as a storm drain channel." Second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 5. T tative Tract Map 25831(Continued from July 18, 1990); Z Cha 90-11 and Ramsgate Specific Plan Amendment No.:2 The Clurman ompany, Inc. - Consulting Planner Smothersesented a request subdivide 50 acres into 195 lots, an endment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan' (adjusting the oundaries to include this tr t), a Zone Change from R 1 Residential to Specific Plan. Th site is located suc at it is surrounded on three sides by th. amsgate Speci ' Plan, on the northerly side of Ramsgate. The estern bo ary of this tract is along the southerly extension Tie is Lane, south of Highway 74. Consulting Planner smothe ve an overview on the changes made at the Commission's eques and the Environmental Impact Report with regard the !,let r from Cal Trans stating concern on freeway ' pacts and the mulative impact. He also stated that this p is being present by the applicant as a Vesting Tentativ Map. Staff is of the inion that this does not present a oblem here, because the p ect is subjective to Specific Plan regulations and requi ents for infra- structure. Chairma Brown opened the public hearing at 7:46 m., asking if any ne wished to speak in favor. Receiving n response, Chai an Brown asked. if anyone wished to speak in op sition. Rec wing no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone ished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman own closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. I, AGENDA ITEM 'O. R PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Public Hearing TTM 26142 August 1, 1990 PREPARED BQ67APPROVED BY: Sated Naas h Dave nderm��C� Associate Planner Comm. ev. Dir. OWNER/APPLICANT South Lake Estates Joint Venture/Wesco Homes, Inc. 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 250 Torrance, California 90505 REQUESTED USE A request for approval subdivision. SIZE AND LOCATION of a 113 lot single-family The site is approximately 29.5 acre. It is located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the City Limits. Assessor's Parcel Number 370-120-022. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of a 113 lot single-family subdivision including an open space lot *113. Internal circulation consists of a grid system with cul-de-sacs. Ingress and egress for the project will be provided via Ontario Way and Stoneman Avenue. Lot sizes range from 6,500 to 14,260 square feet with an 8,245 square foot average. On its June 12, 1990 meeting City Number 53 and Zone Change 90-6 to of this project. ANALYSIS Council approved Annexation facilitate the development The project meets all minimum lot area requirements and street frontage widths. Except for the westerly property line lots which abut approximately 20,000 square foot lots with Mobilehomes/Manufactured Houses on them. Section 17.23.060 of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code suggests that new AGENDAITEM NO. EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Vacant R-1 Low Density Residential North - Vacant/Mobilehomes County Low Density R -R Residential East - Approved Single- R-1 Low Density Family Residences Residential South - 20 Unit Mobilehome R-1 Low Density Subdivision Residential West - Vacant/One Home County Rome Hills M-3 Specific Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of a 113 lot single-family subdivision including an open space lot *113. Internal circulation consists of a grid system with cul-de-sacs. Ingress and egress for the project will be provided via Ontario Way and Stoneman Avenue. Lot sizes range from 6,500 to 14,260 square feet with an 8,245 square foot average. On its June 12, 1990 meeting City Number 53 and Zone Change 90-6 to of this project. ANALYSIS Council approved Annexation facilitate the development The project meets all minimum lot area requirements and street frontage widths. Except for the westerly property line lots which abut approximately 20,000 square foot lots with Mobilehomes/Manufactured Houses on them. Section 17.23.060 of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code suggests that new AGENDAITEM NO. r r Public Hearing TTM 26142 August 1, 1990 Page 2 lots created next to existing large lots should be at least 75 percent of the largest lot abutting them. It should be noted that the 75 percent rule is not a standard and it allows flexibility to the Planning Commission and the City Council on a case-by-case basis. When applied the 75 percent rule suggests a 14,870 square foot lot sizes for this project. The proposed lot sizes range from 10,000 to 14,260 square feet with an average of 11,620 square feet. The applicant and staff have agreed on these lot sizes based on the seventy-five percent (75%) rule and location of these lots. Staff supports smaller lot sizes than those suggested by the seventy-five percent (75%) rule since it will not be economically feasable to place approximately 15,000 square foot lot sizes next to an existing manufactured homes/mobile- homes subdivision. SPECIAL PROJECT CONCERNS 1. The northeastern corner of the project site is subject to 100 year flood; therefore, the proposed building pads are above the base 1,267 foot. 2. The soils report for this site indicates a liquefaction potential; therefore, a combination of soil recompaction and the use of post -tension foundations and flexible gas lines will be utilized. 3. The project is located within the Airport Influence Area and the Airport Land Use Commission has reviewed the proposal and has recommended an avigation easement (Condition No. 42). 4. The site is within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone and in an approximate location of a concealed fault. The County Geologist has reviewed the plans and has recommended mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-12 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 26142 based on the following Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The project meets the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and R-1 Zoning Standards. 2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's subdivision standards. 3. The proposal, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the area; therefore, it will not create any adverse effect on abutting properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for this type of density of development. 5. The project, as conditioned, will not have a significant impact on the environment. AGENDA ITE A4 h.-� r; _ Or r r OFFICE USE ONLY Negative Declaration No. see 9n_-12 Project: Tentative Tra t Map fi149 1. CITY OF LAKE ELSZNORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Developer or Projectl: Contact Person: ohn Elmajian, Address: 2601 Airorot Drive, Su City:_Torrance. GA Tele ho N mb Project Manager p ne u er. (21� ) Saq 957q rtLtitiYcu -- MAY C7 199P Planning Not 2. Environmental Information Prepared by - Soy h Lake Estates Joint Venture Address:2601 A{rnnr nrive CuirP Tin City: lnrranro ( A zip: 9050_ Telephone Number: (_2j_3_) 919-9579 3. Proposed Project Title: Assessor's Parcel Number: 370-120-022-5 Location: North side of Grand Avenue between Stoneman and Ontario Way. Total site acreage: Gross: 29.44 Net: For Residential Project: Number of units: 116 Dwelling units per acre: 4.00 Unit sizes (square feet) : 2 0100 sa. ft oer house (aoVroximate) Attach brief description of proposed 4. ft average lot size intended use, and Phasingofp p project, including project is a phase or r Project, larger if present P portion of a larger project. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other Public approvals required for this project, including those required by local, regional, state, and federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 5. Environmental Setting: Attach a description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and surrounding pro- perties, including information on topography, geo- logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. EXISTING LAND USE.GE 2ONZNG NL PLAN Project site Riverside Low Vacant Land County Density R -R Residential Surrounding North City Vacant Land, 1 Mobileho a R-1 Surrounding East Tract Map No. 24139 74 lot subdivision City Low Surrounding Sin le Famil Residence Residentia South 20 units Mobilehome County Low subdivision R Density Surrounding Resident West �'tt AGENDAITEM One home varanY 1-A County PAGE OF x1 xI x I xl k >9(' I >4 >d xI - I ( I I I I I I xl I I ./ US w 6 O 1 M N C O w A• I. O• • 1 ■ OCU ■0h w °•° I. U •Sw CY .✓10 .1 O •. • .1 0 N O■ a >31.� pp11 �111 CC Y U C •OY O MN.I P�■ CM 00° VM pb4. •Y p� Ca .INC • C •' cc C� 0 R tiOAcxo w•.1 � °O ■Yu .IA • C Yh P■ S P • OP •Y4 00 CGL i ih • ; �.'i .a1C ° u� a a / Ot O 0 .•ice .~i 0 .~i" O. M.4 fi 9 a :P10 5:' Oo8' :g �'�5�° 5�° 04�: �� •g www M l•C.1.6 M• Yp Y N • C •U p•p C. p A CO .1 h C. O• S •O■ ~ S R O O w O./•• .°I• s SM •n'.N~ OP' OS•O �I .Oi ' �I.'1 w• MN 1.1 r� rdYM t OM Yw ppp•U .1 .1 N ON , MpO w■• 1YI.� S • O. COO 0 .1 •C O Acc 02. as MyyyU �r' S°J cows .°I Ya .may ou r eACC: �700q ko 8011~.°% ON .�1 �.'i C O• {"!M s 3Ca s y.l CUY�� 97Y MR■NY �l� CU UOMA� 900/ Moap'/ OC =ti �� CAh G.yO •+CI •RC N yy.■.0 CPM Y R■ OM C■•OCR■• y C.1 p •to Y•• U.1 > !��1Y >. ■•M • •C C7 Ur�Y• i■ P w O+IN■ R • �.1 5 N•I NMw K O •• MON■ 0 A. w+ MG • "'f> ..PI1 P yy o SS" i 4 j A p O A No % A O O i 4 • A O A 0.0 A M • x( x( >4 >4 XI I >d x) >4 >j >j x I I I f 1 l I I I I I 1 I 1 >d C V N L .YI • a• • L C 11.E • Y G 1 C D Y a S 4 ,CI 4 C • O i .°i C M p� 0 u• O 0 Z N SV a Cy« O • • 4 4310 MG•« pMO w% M YAC CD ° COwpOh tiffw p. C 'S M OO U 31.�j7.1 °O' L~7 Sc °> 8100UMNO8~ O C • • OYY.r O N O4■ UV VN •.1• ROS 9°1 YOtisso tia°u °'op M ~ CM N .1M r pee•�" ■ C • ..10 • GG pM•Y Y a. p .'1. i 0C ° . Q�0 O ppO V.Y tll • ° S8' OC �•I Cs.LI V ON ai°i S O PO ��u•J1 ON0. OMCR O ow Fr Fr 8 C% V 6 � q h C O• w M • 0 .1 P ■• O w O N •• p .I w U 0 .1 31. O" O. O C• -x 0 • Y A> O Do- M •Y MYG• NC• AY ah Y" •M C•.1Y>h M" • •� % OM4 R. • OOL .� N 31. Oh M C O ■ OM ■ SM .1 MCC O V S• N34 O .1w w0 U■ .1 .1 • • Nov .1■ CO.4 S G -i IC�6■O 00 Ci •00~409 00 C00Yu0 .'IMeh °3103. C 1` CpySM {i V N.1 OO .°I•C ° .1 ~04G •O' .1 -1 .1.1.1 .1 w>t 06 MO.1• •O . O N Y0R ."-1 40& 0 ° NV U."+ 2 gNaN ggPF•0 .61� iiCM 31. 40C~p"•V ..yiyNO aC'yLJ C> OC OOti6 x�Cpp1 CCN UPON w 1� i01C-� tl0i lc.o I"i00.°i a Su00 NV Ni Ifo U11 A° a 0DCVO IfOi 6�S 0.cia OO.00 tl6L0 .�. tiC ✓n A A- • P u p°4 q U O M P A .j w n >< I >4 XI I x1 I I I I I 'i I I y I 'i I I I I '9 u p yt h O0 i N O• ■ M H ■ N 0 9 G• V R M g a M w0 ■• O M31. 31. Otto ■ O cc q.1 • N Mwp� •> w yCC .1 pCO .Iw .. M4 C 000 w■S Y•.I * rCOOC• • -q CYO �� •M 00 •MN ON ".OIOCw • Mw vOhi ~4 a YO •OM OC ■Mi=/M>. ��y�OY S 0■O CGti uN OYO NO GML••°e O•PovO .I • •P M w w 1 N i i P M O.i i° ■ C•° S a 0 so + B Aq V C6fu1• •OM !O• M N •OY C>.N ••M i° ��L'� Gh • a 8 y e• ��� u S e a u ti i CCV PAG , Ot=,05{ P • a 0 •�j CCC 1 1 1 M i ■ G M 400 NC • N NSu o ..1 P ■✓• C.1•�.MOO ■■aou.1+ 41. a� M G M �10N • C• M ON N N T N .1 •>• 0.aM C✓ C C i R o•G es csuooo ■ as ��oi W. ~1pcc $c ?o�o 0o 0 OD ..'i �"S . U 0 .I b.4" O N M or E9 '.:"a O .)2i •O.CNCIC w0 °TGp+ CN ROC° CpRwD sIHi O.°0 C>Oy N� '.1 .✓iC . •✓a0 E44 M."10 O•q a0-0 ya09 °1✓✓ p0YM. •5 :M�" Q: rn R409•.Nip0 MYR .Ci~y2■0 Y 09 S.GIar CCCeYS nocc N9■• aamuc•1w• q•LI OM S•4R an ROCC O•~p RaG• C.Iq O.1i r. D.0 N` as w• •• M UXi r • GN• 0.0 C Va M• M•1• 00 .0 OMG • MRe O OO Cw tali S~6 (q� G .�1IY p. •N O' ■■• AN O 3. t VOPR>.O .C O •.r•1■•R ■4.iA .O■C 31.•Aw or •00 •a >.• °>� •OND•Ru 4M U C•1 �M a G t'3✓i.Iw ie°� pNppp u.°.a "0 aiiw aA .i PN Y00•R4 •u so UP u u„6tli E8 aU 4 0 u°• q0 o 0 00~K 0.01Cp✓.1✓ .• ORO GYw✓ 1 w000 au •q ■"tlK M .1 E 6.1 P•✓ 1C • 6 O U .> 60.-IC✓G 6 .B Y Y q LI Cti6Y�lwgYp '10M 6 >< I >4 XI I x1 I I I I I 'i I I y I 'i I I I I '9 u p yt h O0 i N O• ■ M H ■ N 0 9 G• V R M g a M w0 ■• O M31. 31. Otto ■ O cc q.1 • N Mwp� •> w yCC .1 pCO .Iw .. M4 C 000 w■S Y•.I * rCOOC• • -q CYO �� •M 00 •MN ON ".OIOCw • Mw vOhi ~4 a YO •OM OC ■Mi=/M>. ��y�OY S 0■O CGti uN OYO NO GML••°e O•PovO .I • •P M w w 1 N i i P M O.i i° ■ C•° S a 0 so + B Aq V C6fu1• •OM !O• M N •OY C>.N ••M i° ��L'� Gh • a 8 y e• ��� u S e a u ti i CCV PAG , Ot=,05{ P yOO� •00.• •O•CC OV .�{OI Y •h YsON° HOMY �KYY• •K° ■05/ Y r ti • ¢Y� �G°y wUy.wD ; OAa YYYYY '�•�pee pp p8e.h Cstft •e • :.CU 40 MCO N~ 8AM0N g , 4O I$ ir •'b'�'.� §.✓iw NM1i 5.•N.1 5>Gvj.w✓ V 5Y YC<CC 1K15•r.,1 tiO�f.V1 e, EE■rKi .■I tNI✓ r.y ��C 00 iwYAC SwCCaO G104OY a,, S06 IH, M � O M ry III I l l IIIIIxi >q xi I I �d x Ix IXi >1 '1 I x 1 S•?G O e OOi Y C .Gi ■C■Y pQr N✓ M1 .M1 pp M .qtr/ Y YKN • .1C C C CG>p°00 MC.�N O C O� • • •KMi h_ YO 6.Oi05°H iN905 g N.ani U O 4 Y U�Y>° •OCC e• 5 O 5 YA,V rS •pit CO>."115UY GC uO Y L� Gw • G• "agVeG %Y • ■ Sw anK 7 •• V y G N C YEp�• Ds1 Y� p IGpY C i•1••OO Y M °a CO soh � yY •ON•~ Ni.•IN C Y i /VC V ti paN,y 1-0 s0: °y�:: Ce K :° y�°Cm fG•C Y C p i C S.Yi OG OC C� Y+�up•Y Li~O « 6 ° C.✓ PU i« Mt O91Mi •OY ° w ar p�•• MKH 4.O • .0 1 O Yo C.0V C" .gi °w Oak ~C Iw .M 0 aw 1101 Y Y5■ CO i•1 Gw7 YC• D■\Y>UM .Ni O U an+1 •• O • >>�.Y Cw 500 agog YYi• 2 y Mpp AOYOI.P 0. 4 0 0.M =wN • b�; p0 p0•NO .1Kan g. Y 2 0 00 0 G.q VLAwu�6G i! YY yOYoa YY•G ° a r w • 6°°•-� • A Y p • N j0/•1 A' Y•TY.1 CO r•T OON. ID ` . A 0 O • M .0O • Y G O N N w .1 A KN•✓p✓0> ~ K K r1: 1 e "I '1 '1 xl x I "I I 'i '1 '1 I I I I I I i I I xI I I I I I I I I I I '9 I I I I I ••Jh Ywl K .10• y� w• OO ■ a./ig 1 C �O 1 O M1 ✓ 0 °N m CO0 p•0✓/ •.p 9Ca Y GO NO °M Op°N�NNg 6w NN O /Oti g.1 V■ •■ pGO ✓O T>/T P O H 4 G L ✓ / qw.4 N °U 0✓.,yyGG °nii o■ppp c MC y■w G.1 • 1 w i 1•i0 O trY 0.0.10✓ D 0�9 Og0 a• tY anOcu✓ N •.a Y K K e 00 g✓9 g1Au NM 111111110:0 •7 ••1: •.y 210 CN ♦ly :./i0 MN w>C .e C~ t 5 oa V; .Ki f .1A .•.>i U c °N p tI N 0 tl ■w .10 Y h • a Op 1MN01 a • NGGG �yJ 6 i■ m N N • 0 w A w C ✓ M t C O C° t Y Y• 0 .. K O N O 00 C .1 • g ■ O .I N p N 12" 310 OY GO . V ^�• ■ C ^1 yti• •C•ICC0 K.106 Y1 YCYOh ✓O YON Y.•w OM tiYe ✓O g• Ar6 i 0. KCC Y•.O •an •C • CGU e> tiK 0•.✓ii O•U.1UCV OYg 06 00 pK■HC O•~+0. OC .10• tiOUm 4Y bri.,°j ..Kjtim -C .ri✓ O°i0 OC YC� 6w Y�n.■j •~Cw. gKlq i0 YM ✓O CC■�■ YCC° ~Njj an✓C C 4 0 •� ee N/ • O yTm = .1 Nq M U• H N� K Y C M G .01 t�� r O O. M✓ h y•U! Y M N COO M ••w •9N V G6^ 4 NO CN KO ° G Y N a N Om Y200 •6■ N•A V9000 L D..w U.1 VYO a • pp.�•/h C✓ • G •.1 ✓■/+ (p(y� ✓ L• ,M ,p•�� • N U NN .+, YO YC s5•gY✓/Y KN �.. au 5 • g .1UVw 65 • •O�G� tl/■ www Yl•• ""i•■\ 60q u A 2 6 w w o i aauoa 00.0 i 1 O .tea OF K A Scum F2 i PAGF p • w p 0 • A FOR OFFICE USE ONLY I. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: N YES MAYBEISO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative declaration to be issued. II. DETERMINATION: 47 The proposed project should not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. Although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, it will not in this case because of the attached mitigation measures. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. —C//III. REVIEWED BY: DATE: PLANNING DIRECTOR:E�l� _ v�BATE; 27f d P. F vD.4 Af , -� OF 6 7. r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (Continued) 3. Project Desc infirm• The project consists of an Annexation of 29.44 acres from Riverside County into the City of Lake Elsinore, a zone change from County Rural Residential (R -R) to City Single Family Residential (R-1), and a general plan amendment to low density residential. We will be filing one Tentative Tract Map of approximately 116 lots (4.00/acre) shortly. 4. Related Permits: The project will require approval from Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the annexation into the City. Pursuant to our meeting with LAFCO, they are in full support of our request for annexation. We may also need to coordinate with the the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers. In light of our adjacent project (Tracts 24138, 24139 & 24215), it is most likely we will only be required to acquire a Nationwide Permit which falls under a catagorical exemption. 5. Environmental Setting• The property consists of a gentle northward sloping terrain from Samuel Drive to the lake. The property currently has no urban use occuring on the site. The property is surrounded by residential uses on the south and east. To the north and south is vacant land. A very small portion of the property drops below and elevation of 1267' and consequently into the level of the adjacent floodplain. Also, a small portion of the property lies within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Earthquake Zone. We have conducted a geologic fault study to show that the property is not subject to any active faults. The final report will be available shortly. The soils consist of a layer of topsoil (1.5 to 2.5 feet thick) comprised of soft sandy silt and loose silty sand, underlain by late Pleistocene to Holocene age alluvial deposits consisting of sandy silt and silty sand, and Pleistocene age sedimentary bedrock of the Pauba Formation. The toxic report shows the site has never been subject to any toxics. Annual grasses and weeds make up the only vegitation on the site. There are no sensitive or endangered species located on the site, only typical animal life as expected on any urban fringe. There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects on the subject property. Enerov conservation: A. The maximum building heights of the designed homes will not limit solar access rights. In addition, by complying With City setback requirements, solar rights will be further protected. B. All the buildings comply with Title 24 energy requirements. The developer has made every effort to use Passive solar systems in their design. C. The developer has met and/or exceeded State and City Code requirements for energy conservation. Environmenta impacts 1.b,e There will be disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcrowding of the soil and potential soil erosion, in order to facilitate site development. Grading will be limited to cuts and fills a compaction of soil material will be required. Xh AGENDA ITEM N P',' OF.A r r grading will be monitored by a registered geologist, the applicant will provide both temporary and permanent erosion control to the City standards. Therefore, no significant impact is expected. 1.g The northeastern portion of the subject site is located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. The site has also been identified as an area potentially subject to liquefaction. Based on a report prepared by California GeoTek in 19821 we are preparing a geologic fault investigation for the subject site. our investigation re -trenches the work done in the 1982 report. The results of the study indicate that no geomorphic or shallow subsurface expressions of faulting were observed in the field. The final form of the report will be available shortly for your review as well as the County Geologist's review. However, based on the investigation, we feel direct fault rupture should not be a factor for the subject site. The soils report for this site indicates a liquefaction potential. By utilizing a combination of soil recompaction and the use of post -tension foundations and flexible gas lines, the impact will be mitigated to insignifigance. Note: The liquefaction study prepared for the adjacent Tracts 24138, 24139 and 24215 is available upon your request. ' 3.b The project will result in a decrease in absorption rates created from the overcovering of the soil with impervious surfaces. This increased run-off will not be significant since the project will incorporate adequate storm drain facilities. 3.i The northeastern corner of the subject site could be inundated by a 100 year flood. However, the proposed building pads will be located above the 1267' base flood level, thereby mitigating this potential impact. 6.a The projectwill increase existing ambient noise levels and will expose people to higher noise levels during construction. The increase of noise from vacant land to a developed subdivision is not expected to be significant to surrounding developed properties or future owners of this subdivision. Construction noise levels will be regulated by City Zoning Standards. Therefore, noise impacts are not expected to be significant. 13. The proposal will result in additional vehicular trips on Ontario Way, Samuel Drive and Stoneman (via Samuel Drive) and will alter the existing transportation network. Should it be required, a traffic study will be prepared to review the extent of potential impacts both on and off-site. However, with the street improvements of the project, we expect no significant impacts. 14.a,f The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for fire, police, schools, recreational, maintenance of public facilities and other governmental services due to the construction of new residential units and public roads and faciliti These service costs will be miticAtWA47ElgtWenn ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (Continued): fees levied at the time of building permits. In addition, property and sales taxes generated from this development are expected to provide additional revenue to the City to pay for these services. 16.a -e The project will result in the need to extend or expand the power, communication, water and sewer systems. Since all of these services are immediately available and located adjacent to the subject site, no significant environmental impact is expected. AGENDA ITEM, 037dY3�c�aii7 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Mao 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12• Brookstone Development, Inc.: A request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings located at the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. BY 1.�L� Sandra Massa -La,, Consulting Planr APPROVED BY BACKGROUND City Manager On August 1, 1990, the Planning Commission considered and approved the request to subdivide a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) industrial lots for the construction of industrial type tilt up buildings which would total approximately 61,000 square feet of leasable space. The project includes the grading of approximately 500,000 cubic yards of soil. The majority of which will be exported off-site. The Planning Commission comments refer to refining the Conditions of Approval. Tentative Tract 25717 Condition No. 6, which referred to the code requirement of a minimum 100' lot frontage, was deleted from the Conditions of Approval because of the integrated nature of the development and the on-site parking provided for each of the developed lots. The conditions established for the Industrial Project delete Condition No. 5, which refers to the minimum lot frontage. Condition No. 21, refers to the landscape condition, additional wording was included to require a fee for the review of the landscape plan. Said fee would be established upon submittal of the plan. DISCUSSION The development, while it would be a for -sale project, will have enhanced landscape treatments which would be the responsibility of the entire owners group. The development should provide through the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, for the maintenance of the landscaping throughout the development. This would be accomplished through a landscape easement, to permit maintenance for all the landscaping within the total development. It is requested that the City Council consider the inclusion of an additional condition of approval relative to the landscape AGENDA ITEM NO.4 PAGE / OF Page 2 August 28, 1990 subject: Tentative Parcel Map 25717; Industrial Project 89-12 maintenance on the entire site as follows: Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions shall be established for the overall development which defines the responsibilities of the landscape maintenance for the entire development. Said CC&R's shall establish landscape easements to ensure access to all landscaped areas on each lot. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration 89-57 and approve Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 based on the Finding and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval which includes an additional condition referring to the landscape maintenance. FINDINGS - Tentative Parcel Man 25717 1. This project as conditioned would not have significant impact upon the environment. 2. The Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned complies with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan and the M-1 Zoning Standards. 3. The project as conditioned, complies with the City's Subdivision Standards. 4. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the findings established in the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66474. FINDINGS - Industrial Project 89-12 1. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The project as conditioned complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and meets all the minimum requirements if the M-1 Zoning District. 3. The project as conditioned complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070 including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the proposed project to insure development of the property in accordance with the Objectives of this Chapter an the M-1 District in which the site is located. AGENDA ITEM No.)gi PAGE OF 41 r id CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 Planning Division 1. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 shall expire two (2) years from date of approval unless extended pursuant to State and local law or recordation of Final Map. 2. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures as stated in Negative Declaration 89-57. 3. Meet all Riverside County Flood Control District requirements. 4. All lots shall hook up to sewer. 5. Prior to Final Map, the applicant shall sign and complete the "Acknowledgment of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 6. X rauisa&--partael- -map -or- vadanee- — equ1red-Sror-%vts lir-7-r-8-and-9--ix�-that-tlis-st��et-��-0Atage-e'koes-got--�aeet--the SHCI1lU.tBd--Silo-fi?Ot-�3i���2i&. DELETE Engineering Department 7. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. S. Provide in -lieu payment for future off-site improvements on Flint Stret from Lewis to Lowell or apply for and complete the street abondonment process on Flint Street. 9. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 10. "A" Street and Silver Street shall have a sixty (60) foot right-of-way with forty (40) foot curb -to -curb. 11. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 12. Submit a "will -serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water agency, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 13. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 14. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 15. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). All requirements for encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 16. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street design recommendation prior to recordation of Final Map. Provide final Soils Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification. 17. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent.; AGENDA ITEM NO __p_� ..,- p-7—• ' PAGE r 61 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 CONTINUED 18. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 19. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 20. Lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 21. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through site, or provided for by a method approved by the City Engineer. 22. Applicant shall provide all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to Final Map approval. 23. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to approval of Final Map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 24. Contribute $153.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. 25. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds. 26. Silver Street shall be improved to provide for half street improvements plus an additional twelve (12) feet of pavement west of centerline. 27. Developer shall contribute $3,900 towards the design and construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Central and Collier. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at lease three percent (3$) and should contribute three percent (3%) towards construction. 28. The developer shall pay for "No parking" and Street sweeping signs. 29. Applicant shall provide written approval from Riverside County Fire Department approving street circulation for site. 30. With the development of this site, all storm facilities shall provide tract and downstream property owners with 100 year storm flood protection. 31. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by developer per City standard, tapes to be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. If at the time of Certificate of Occupancy no system has been established by the City, this condition shall be waived, and the Developer will pay a fee of $1,000.00 per sheet for future final tract digitizing. 32. Southerly tract boundary shall be extended to centerline of Flint Street and abandoned on map. Southern half of Flint Street from Lewis to Lowell shall be processed for abandonment by the applicant and southern half of street shall be vacated concurrently with Final Map approval. 33. Applicant shall cooperate with property owner of Lot 19 and 20 for the development of Flint Street between Lewis and Silver Streets. PAGE ._I OF r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 CONTINUED 34. Applicant shall provide cash deposit for possible road repair caused by hauling export from site prior to grading permit. 35. Developer shall grade and provide two (2) paved travel lanes (25 feet) on Flint from Silver to existing improvements. Improvements shall match existing grade on Flint subject to the approval of the City Engineer. AGEN4`A fTEit PAI-, 5 OF_�LL — -- Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 6 CONTINUED mmissioner Wilsey commented on maintenance of slopes, apd Ho eowner Association maintenance area,. and fencing of rear 1 5 _ Commis ' oner Gilenson commented on lot sizes and a Staff Report a Exhibit indicating151 lots still under ,000 square feet; cond ion number 32, pertaining to reimbu ement ertagree ments and wh they are from; condition numbe 46, pertaining to public work construction agreement. Motion by Commiss' ner Wils y to reco end to City Council adoption of Negat a Declaration -6 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 2 831, Specific lan Amendment No. 2 and Zone Change 90-11 base n the Fin ngs and subject to the 53 Conditions of Approval 1 ted in he Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson with is ssion. Commissioner Gilenson ask 'f the motion included the additional verbiage to co itio number 32. Commissioner Wilsey mended his otion to include the amendment to condit' n number 32, as ollows: Condition 32: "The developer all be eligible for reimbursement greements from surrounding devel ments for the cost of off-site improvements required of this proj t." Co ssioner Gilenson amended his second to in ude the a ndment to the motion. pproved 4-0 6. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 - Brookstone Development, Inc.! Community Development Director Gunderman presented a request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction (on the subject property) of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings totaling approximately 60,985 square feet, located on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. Community Development Director Gunderman requested that condition number 5 of Industrial Project 89-12 be deleted and condition number 6 for Tentative Parcel Map 25717 be deleted, and gave the reasoning behind the deletion of these conditions. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak inIfavor. Mr. Vince Daly, representing Brookstone Development, commented on staff's concerns listed on Page 3 of the Staff Report, items 1-6, and requested that the Commission approve this project as amended by staff. Chairman Brown asked'if anyone else wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. ! Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 21, for AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 7 Industrial Project 89-12, and suggested the following verbiage be added: "fee to be determined at the time of application." Motion by Commissioner Saathloff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-57 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval (35 for Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and 27 for Industrial Project 89-12) listed in the staff Report with the following amendments: Tentative Parcel Map 25717: Condition No. 6: Delete Industrial Project 89-12: Condition No. 5: Delete Condition No. 21: "A Final Landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for; approval and include landscape and irrigation specifications to be approved by the City's Landscape Architect, fee to be determined at time of application. The revised plans should be prepared and signed by ';a licensed Landscape Architect and include the following:" Second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 At this time, 8:00 p.m., the Planning Commission recessed. At this time, 8:12 p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened. 7. Annexation 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Vallpy De opment LP - Community Development Director Gund an prese ed a request to annex 10.68 acres of uninco rated County Riverside land into the City of Lake Elsin a and to pre -zone t property C-2 (General Commercial). a subject property is ated between Dexter Avenue on the ortheast and I-15 freeway on a southwest and the existin ity boundaries on the northwest d southeast. Chairman Brown opened a public hear' g at 8:13 p.m., asking if anyone wished to spe in favor Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if an he wi ed to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chai n row asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Recei g no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing a 8: p.m. There being no discussi for a motion. / Motion by Commiss' ner adoption of Ne tive Annexation 55 d Zone 1 Condition Approval Commission Gilenson. Approved -0 at the tab , Chairman Brown called Wilsey to recomme to City Council Declaration 90-22 a d approval of Change 90-7 based on th Findings and listed in the Staff Repor second by Zone hange 90-10 - George Alongi - Assistant Planner DeGae prptented a request for a Zone Change on three parcels from R 2, Residential, to R-3, Residential, to establish consistency AGENDA ITEM NO.31 'tom' PAGE � OF� PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Deborah Bradford Planning Consultant OWNER APPLICANT Brookstone Development, Inc. Post Office Box 939 31681 Riverside Drive, Suite A Lake Elsinore, California 92330 USE Public Hearing TPM 25717 I 89-12 August 1, 1990 A request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction (on the subject property) of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings totaling approximately 60,985 square feet of building area. SIZE AND LOCATION 15.29 gross acres located on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING Project Site - Vacant North - Vacant East South West Vacant/Water Tank Vacant/Single M-1 R-1 R-1 GENERAL PLAN 10 Limited Industrial Floodway Fringe Environmentally Sensitive R-1 10 Limited Industrial Medium Density (6.1 to 12. d/1) Vacant/Manufac- R-1 10 Limited turing and Light Industrial Industrial Structures On April 24, 1990 the City Council approved General Plan Amendment 89-15 and Zone Change 89-17 based on the findings as stated in the April 24th Staff Report (see attached). The General Plan Amendment allowed for the land use designation of the subject property to be changed from "Environmentally Sensitive" to Limited Industrial. Zoning was changed from the R-1 (Single -Family Residential) Zoning District to the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) Zoning District. Additionally, the City Council approved the Negative Declaration submitted for these projects. AGENDA ITEM QNO. .�_ PAGE D OF�/"11 r r Public Hearing TPM 25717 I 89-12 August 1, 1990 Page 2 DISCUSSION _ TENTATIVE PARCEi AP 25717 The subject property is presently a vacant knoll comprised of approximately 15.29 acres and surrounded by commercial, industrial and residential development. As indicated in the biology study submitted by the applicant, vegetation on the project site is comprised primarily of upland coastal sage scrub which is not considered to be environmentally sensitive or significant. Additionally, wildlife on the project site was minimal and did not consist of any significant, rare, or endangered species. The subdivision proposes to divide the property into eleven (11) lots. The minimum lot size in the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) Zoning District is 20,000 net square feet. All the lots exceed this minimum and range in size from 20,080 net square feet to 2.40 net acres. Access to the project site would be via Silver Street and the proposed road along the northern boundary of the site. Lot 1 would obtain access from Silver Street, while the remaining lots would obtain access from the proposed road. ANALYSIS Staff has determined that the lot configuration of the proposed subdivision is the most compatible with surrounding development. However, staff is concerned with the amount of grading proposed and that the street frontage widths of Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9 do not meet the required 100 foot minimum. To bring these lots into compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore's Municipal Code, a variance would be required. However, the applicant could also reduce the number of lots or reconfigure the proposed cul-de-sac road. An alternative road design could be to loop the road around and terminate onto Silver Street, which would require an alteration to the design of the lots. In terms of grading, the incorporation of contour grading methods subject to approval of the City Engineer and increased landscaping shall be required to obtain a more natural appearance, particularly to the residential neighborhood to the south. DISCUSSION _ DESIGN REVIEW INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-12 The applicant is proposing to construct eleven (11) industrial buildings on the subject property located on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets. Buildings would range in size from 3,969 to 7,499 square feet. Total building square footage would be approximately 60,985 feet. The following analysis briefly addresses the various components of the site plan and elevations and staff concerns: SITE PLAN The site plan submitted by the applicant indicates that each building has individual drive approaches and parking areas. Parking provided for each building meets the Zoning Code requirements for industrial uses of 500 square feet of building square footage per vehicle. Building setbacks are in compliance with the setback standards stated in the M-1 Zoning District. However, staff has concerns with the site plan in the following areas: AGEaNDA ITEM. 1.410. a PAG- 0r 1 r r Public Hearing TPM 25717 189-12 August 1, 1990 Page 3 1. walkways to the main entrances of buildings 6, 7, 8 and 9 have not been indicated on the site plan. 2. The street frontage widths of Lots 61 71 8 and 9 do not meet the minimum 100 foot requirement as stated in Section 17.56.060 of the Municipal Code. 3. Loading spaces for buildings 6, 71 8 and 9 have not been indicated on the site plan. 4. The location of handicapped parking spaces have not been delineated on the site plan. S. Building 5 has two drive approaches. 6. The location of walls and fences have not been indicated on the site plan. ELEVATIONS The elevations submitted by the applicant indicate that the proposed buildings will be approximately 19' 6" in height and be of concrete tilt -up construction. The upper portion of the buildings are proposed to consist of smooth concrete grey painted bands. Panels in between the windows would be textured concrete painted a grey color. The windows are proposed to be tinted grey with black anodized aluminum frames. Rectangular or round columns are proposed at the main entrance of each building. The front doors would consist of colors and materials similar to the proposed windows. A metal roll up door for loading and unloading purposes is proposed along the rear elevations. In reviewing the elevations, staff does not have any specific concerns and has determined that the overall design of the buildings would be compatible with the surrounding area. LANDSCAPE PLAN Staff has contacted the applicant regarding the submittal of a revised landscape plan indicating the proposed eleven (11) unit industrial park. ENVIRONMENTAL A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for both the Parcel Map and Industrial Design Review. The areas of significant concern were found in the earth, air, water, plant life, noise, light and glare, transportation and aesthetic sections. Mitigation measures proposed in Negative Declaration 89-57 would provide options to the developer to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration 89-57 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 based on the Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 1. This project as conditioned would not have a significant impact upon the environment. AGENDA '.-Er.. ;. r r Public Hearing TPM 25717 I 89-12 August 1, 1990 Page 4 2. The Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned complies with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan and the M-1 Zoning Standards. 3. The project as conditioned, complies with the City's Subdivision Standards. 4. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the findings established in the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66474. FINDINGS _ INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-12 1. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The project as conditioned complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and meets all the minimum requirements if the M-1 Zoning District. 3. The project as conditioned complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070 including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the proposed project to insure development of the property in accordance with the Objectives of this Chapter an the M-1 District in which the site is located. AGENDA ilt,i !.-0% PA'S C do - IC USE VNLY Negative Declaration No. 89-57 Project:TOM 25717 CPA 89-1F 2L_M-17 CITY 0 SAKE ELSINORE r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM i 1. Developer or Project: , Contact Person: Vince Daly Address: Post Office Box City: a e shore zip: 92330 Telephone Number: ( 14 )674-7823 2. Environmental Information Prepared by: Brookstone Development Address:P.O. Box 939 City: Lake Elsinore ___ Zip: 92330 3. Proposed Project Title: Flint Location: Nom Total site acreage: Gross: 19-29+ NSt: 13.34+ For Residential Project: Number of units: 11 Dwelling units per acre: 1 7n Unit sizes (square feet): rnn avoraga Attach brief description of proposed project, including intended use, and phasing of project, or if present project is a phase or portion of a larger project. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by local, regional, state, and federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 5. Environmental Setting: Attach a description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and surrounding pro- perties, including information on topography, geo- logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. WA odium to 12.D/L AGENDA ITEW N0.3 PAGE OF—LLI, GENERAL EXISTING LAND USE. ZONING PLAN Project site Vacant 2+-1 10 Limited Industrial Surrounding Vacant M-1 14B North Flood Way Fringe Surrounding Vacant R-1 14C East Water Tank Environmenta Sensitive Surrounding Vacant/Single R-1 10 Limited South industrial density 6.1 Surrounding Vacant/ Manufacturing M-1 10 Limited West and Light Industrial Industrial Structures WA odium to 12.D/L AGENDA ITEW N0.3 PAGE OF—LLI, 1 I f xl I I xl I I I>1 I xl i XE f i xl XI I xl I x l I I i a >j I li I I I I I x l I I X I I O - N N a.O I O N.0 C � M T N � O• • 1 • O T4 O c .000 • • O C• 1 0 w pM1 y Y M • .0 "a •er• O EEG 8 •4 N Y Vw R✓ w• N O Y•Oa NCV peOY O O Yww PiG �M 0.000 YY ppW •y C8 FO a v i M1 Y A i O•% P 4 • �O • C O O • m N i % O t .a1 y% G O VM O V C O • >QQC• MV LOO CCV • t 6 C Cyj■0■�.0.0 O• CCC O: �cc •L 6 O Ni m0 N~ P. M.mi M V Be P.•. V Y a 00V O CY .a 4•J .°IwL D •M: OV m M yti P• 0 •O• ••1 3 Y sG • we N •c.0a4 M• y Y N •RC •U VO4 RA R.0 M1 PO• V •Oa 'I L 4 N • C c N C R •+ .I go.. w • R .1 N O 4 O C• • M • Y O --. B.G. te Hm S CM HM GyGyGyC O YO a0 ti.0 N.0 N• N0. qU N NYN wOum Oia CNC. DVY\M1 sc.0 SIO a.61��M1 074M1" go 4 c01••on .0 Ni � Cp •C Cv �O s Yi• ou ML R -•I .•i•i 0c4 scoo , Oti tylU tic pig .-mtiOWCQF U U C G O B. y0t 0 Ma =G p0 O M Y+Ci Oa•N F 04 NA .I so -I COO m a Y Nom.�U 04 d••� tG UU4yF • a q a • M 0 aN 6 ♦♦•F ti N• O Y pOp F1- G.1• 0w • 4 C� Ui�Yi O N rci O.ciMe oc 0 A7 {Yr �•°IMww RO Gi rcr 01•.Aq ON so MG 11G .if i CO P e; mo.m. A wCCa +I• PG Ccq m iM • A Y O ItM • A V 4 ZM m A V .40.0 .1 me O m N t. m >` l x1 I I I I I I xl I l I I � xl I I I I xl I I I I C Y - N F •yi • o a • G G O Y G t a O Y P Iva Y Y N O AN Y N 1 U G✓ .0 •• G C w • y m -I Y U O O 1 +14 0 P Y 00 0 Y P 24 O Y.• Y i N m Y m • M1 y O 1 No C 0. ✓ G O • 0 w G a✓ N P i L Y ti b ✓ Y N • M1 N O w 6 N Y N a N 0 1 • Y C N C 0 0 >. O N~p m ~~ i a4 .1 C V N mq U >aOT .0 O C a Od 4YNAmm MH V •OM FN Nm4 O 4 M Y OYYN C - N O N 00 UY YT O.1 Y a>P. ••1P 'ti NY✓ a O O q U OY O .I •-I OO m 60 A 6 y 6 eN042 O V Ot ✓4yaw2 0 • ) �C Ma 0 Pm k 4No .0 gGL4 4GY YVti •.a�•ai O i Ci 4 NO w mEUa, y MDY0 oYY Y0 C+Gi •OY444 Vi P•aOwO CMp ON•M1 V A Y N • Y C O O O U a 0 0 O ✓ m O U a m a N p m m UM1 N mM NVCY •JNCY A✓PM1 Y.� •N ✓Gm•�Y>M1 w.0 •rU.0 k NYN 40 a CxY a qM1 C O ..N a {1 -I .IY aY OM M FY C-IMU .0T Ow FNa m a m0 ✓F> G O OY C .0N>• OM1 N F 4 O Oa. Ew • YY ••� N Ga 0Y ✓ Y Mi O ..iw .I d Y m D Y w m G 0 0 N Y G - 3 C a 0 0 C. m N a w Y a w c M y .I q .. M m 0 3 a 3 • W yCU G .I .1-. YN O PO .INm w cC 00 Ci p0 as y04 00 Rm4 N✓O 4.6a • C yD~m ✓ Gam Vv ✓yqT .0 •Can •NCM 03 ~• M -w T64A v ~ LLY. CaAY UVOW N O a❑ mY NO 00 •Y Ym •mm a0 YU mm0✓.. N mYM1 •4 PY UL avo- a 44 O Y Y Y m N U M V U.0 Z P O@ 1. Mc N N.0 P m M1 G N .I .0• a N m N P C P .. N y C .� .+ 0 T N .I >• •a, •+ 09 O tla O GMOw G-ItlY OM GwT DYG.0 OY YMtl CaOitly •a.+a OYgY O 1 GOO 3 A M Y.0 yw TU NP> mmYY y mN4 •YOGYN Y M CON Y Dqa yyNu O O a- P M ti L A .0 O G O G O O N F N m p .0 N t 0 O .. q, N D a N ••I N o GG N F N G T V 6> a % Y O N .0 O Vag woo Fa 46m.0 Y 0060 V4M3 40 UOA Div FPO 403 uPV O.IA Yfmma WaL0 W .� M a y G m G �+ n >d I I I I XI I XI XI XI >< I I I I N N O1 • N a V ■ P Y AMO O•.>IGN 1 1 O • • YC P V a Oa6NYo Da44N • C• N a OC Y M m M4cce M O • N N .I • N -.I O •4GrMY' 4Me au .IUY O N T T O•• m U OY m.0O m > M •GF.0 GO GCA0 aC Dm - Nu NF O -. TY ma 4.1• P • 0 0 GOO. F -. C C O F NOm O i • w L• N G.0 4.0 O -c on Y•.0A •' a -m 00 A 4 0 0 m m 0 o o i .. V G Y - .1 U Y Y .. o as •> ppN ww •FmOc•T N P .IO D� CCU ROw DUY-ICFm DPP46 4 F 4 DY OOw .I O D.M.Mov.Q DMO ♦IG N 4U .I.IM CO OF 4.0F.0Y • M .. • O M1 O m V.0 • D N 4 A• M 0 N T O✓ b F ■ M1 O .+ Yw Cam •r0 Y OC M0N4 N y •bm FG-. .. • Y m wO CDC C a P6 O RaMM1 J.UYOM1 ObG%G q PN .•m VNPm NNo op N • O w AmY a=00 •ON YOYN G N i0a9 TN a a0N a mmLPGP4Y0Nq .NY P.O0O vCo- •T 4.0Vr.wD Y c5l P emoo TYY gOgYrYJNU GCV .Ow LNY GNCd CML.0Nop F D -O DUO UMw E. oaw 4i.a 0 0 0.O0 0.0 Wa10 q1 y.. MI .c1 D A Y 4 • w P AGENDA IT -7,; rw. y� Pk3E 1;� OF� P O O q 4 G 1 1 1 N m C 1 4N-. CN ., i U q -.G 0 Oa D • L Y b N O M C 0 P E O W C N N Y a Y -. P C.0 Y• �N tl 4 O > > m Y Y a m A o 0 v Ym.0 w.0 y w GmM ✓ D D CC -+ ON a a OH UtlC a 6 Cm 0.CY am 00a OOC aMm N •P Gm - •+ O NV Y 4•. • Go wMDY >>..c 09. tio"VaC ~GV 5 r a • w, L PNr N O C HO 3 N D P m 0 tl C 333AIIIOY a4 >Y •O Ga.. 4>>:LCO.•M D ✓ O4C •-r •GmiaYw> >.0 V N CN .0•' i• O ee4 Go OO aM-.D Mqe> CW a >•PC GW ova OY• • •O Nan - ally > m ••CIM U -P. C Ya O • Y N Do- • a 0 a •..4 m.0 o•• 0 G 0 L4 P Eau aL NYYm>*+ ■■d Y -OA-. a✓ a OY - 01 C CYYCO.0 •• U N Y N .. 4• NO.. O a • ML •bP 40 AV Y4 am•4 wcy M DTC✓ 6P-.0 04" V0 Cw C4 •✓ •..O 0 YY N4acGawok .I e•a 4 YA 0 uz Mcm a •OOyVF-PI~ •V C O % 0 V 0 y • U 4 U P y 4 N b O w 0 4 0 C -. Q. Y m• Coca G.2c, wgq•1 ggq6M t• Nu OHCa qY »q~4 Y .p NU I Y a LN o I[-O� •�•Y 64 ZJ✓a .I✓Y N•. Y 0.1 w4Y Y C, C OD C -us V~GG YONaTO C ON. • N q O• P U 4 U Y .0.0 m Y O: 0 0 m 4 4 ✓ i 0, • a P W a am,a a✓ H M U am O Y TpOb G a N L TY C G 4 ••. S N SY.0 >60aW V m .0.. Y p Nm Oa P✓ -0 aH"a mPa.0 M .0✓ as 0 0 a A • •Yti rl PNumam6YY •aaa Yq • AY 004M Yewq t COOL Pd..O 1. Y A dp AYY> F +I✓WaYH p0 •Owa O Y "yI C O Y a s V N V V M> 0 L N _ H W tl 0 a 6 Y .I a H a T b✓ O w a 0 U •L .ai .0 O u a O Y L % •. aY Da YU HM Y•,.0 O OM✓ c c6M..✓ YY O Y OmaO DYNY K Mau0 0u omw+ Y M M g a n P Y Y q C a O U C W 4 L H E Y w+, g Y 6 .0 o H a 0• U W FD-.N3Yc6.0 aUq a IY r >d I I I I XI I XI XI XI >< I I I I N N O1 • N a V ■ P Y AMO O•.>IGN 1 1 O • • YC P V a Oa6NYo Da44N • C• N a OC Y M m M4cce M O • N N .I • N -.I O •4GrMY' 4Me au .IUY O N T T O•• m U OY m.0O m > M •GF.0 GO GCA0 aC Dm - Nu NF O -. TY ma 4.1• P • 0 0 GOO. F -. C C O F NOm O i • w L• N G.0 4.0 O -c on Y•.0A •' a -m 00 A 4 0 0 m m 0 o o i .. V G Y - .1 U Y Y .. o as •> ppN ww •FmOc•T N P .IO D� CCU ROw DUY-ICFm DPP46 4 F 4 DY OOw .I O D.M.Mov.Q DMO ♦IG N 4U .I.IM CO OF 4.0F.0Y • M .. • O M1 O m V.0 • D N 4 A• M 0 N T O✓ b F ■ M1 O .+ Yw Cam •r0 Y OC M0N4 N y •bm FG-. .. • Y m wO CDC C a P6 O RaMM1 J.UYOM1 ObG%G q PN .•m VNPm NNo op N • O w AmY a=00 •ON YOYN G N i0a9 TN a a0N a mmLPGP4Y0Nq .NY P.O0O vCo- •T 4.0Vr.wD Y c5l P emoo TYY gOgYrYJNU GCV .Ow LNY GNCd CML.0Nop F D -O DUO UMw E. oaw 4i.a 0 0 0.O0 0.0 Wa10 q1 y.. MI .c1 D A Y 4 • w P AGENDA IT -7,; rw. y� Pk3E 1;� OF� x► I I S I I C I xl xI xl xl 1 y 1 IC As •Jf tl f 1, kZE ANY 7060 oko.k •G9 it Y •M1 7 0 6 • • O 00 • Y O > N • M m 6 •Nf0 • •70 •A • pYUyO 40wM N60 rife AOia N•FO 00 �wycyc • NOwco,' p:y s oL y0•�� *was a"A1Vo CRY V OYYLN OGw OY OOi••�•�: 6�3•R 'Im O N MtlUMf M BV• YY O'• YGmmti i Yf 7 R✓ O 60 •M R ••17 0.YO GOY O.+ N • UN . PC 0 • ~TY O LmewU LYYY CM1 ftt • a i07 ; •G7� CYYY R Ytl9YN.1 Y>Ym••1Y JIYLY �•19Y O w w h L 0 P 9 L ••� 9 U c U U e ✓ tl C ,:.V, N HV YO 'IgYL.�• Of YNmom Y m N G Y m .1 O f✓ 'I N M 'l e1 U Y mpprr M M GL+10 '.1 CYN7A OmN 7 '.1%q O MYPYmN V itiYAm itim6AO 860fY if•0. a" VN C ."I •' •mL%7 pp C R•Y fY U • A O w o w n ><�Ixl XI 1 1 I I xl�XlxlXlXl I I 1 • 1 1 M M1 m C V .j ✓ M1 q Yti a 1 Y CK0 I ti C 7 C Y 0 Y••1 h b a L 1 0 60 O Y Y A • 6 Y .1 I N O �1 C 4 O N Y • h L7L O q UP m• NOY 0 07 M1 fi • M1 0 6 Y 9 Oq OG LY 7 YY y•.N 4 .~1H O f E COPY MY.- O Y C N m • 04•71h Y i 6�tYY U�6 N y0yt C Ym >> < O Oh}b.� OY !!lN,,,.A1w RCM P T Y G O Y Cw XL .fiL 04 i•~ILsY =w9 d✓ G -01 Y-•1 RU G 6 ✓M Uwu>O GOCO a • U OTG•Y••.Yi ON V�4iYHC tlYEw O Y M✓ wC O Cd CXYYO YN qrl Y • ti M C .� C qI. tlw YO GY• mc0 U A. Ow 2 t V� �1f 0'pU .1900 Y O A 9 f =•• .OMA 0.Q .�+Aq0~t0 •9CYT o Y Y•�.1 O M ✓ eM q OwL❑ MY7N F Y O O Y ORW.. OL TOm •.✓10Y m Y> G O O OU U m Y 'a Y q Mqq ry Y�1U7YY Ud Om Y 4 q Cd >M1 'I 0 w60Y0 SCgA M U M q q LY COLY •q L»qY•1 M>GP 0 0. h Mw m�1 Om .� • Y7 O >`� Y•1 G 4 Y O CL PY '•1 M O D9 d M 3 .f OY D F M1 O i i r✓i7 w9L d 7✓ 0Y OG 4Cf M L O M r• 6 O H .a Y +1 M1 U 3 •• .N Y d m q'1 O Y �1.i C R.1 ! Y ✓Y a U O eY ✓.+w 4�{>>{1�1 C 07 Yyy GO-2IY 0C O sMs eq75 M M 9 ON YYY6 •C UG••17 Otl Umb✓U4 w O U O� qY0 YY >.Y iw i.O YM Y✓•a O O g Y Y 0 Y MgYC XO ✓YYWmo OM MOYn•>>1q W a. W 0.✓ SNN Om P•+ DO R9•NO w.1YC•• Q V 3 to W b eE VGL+1 W6 ILI ~7 fY Q. Y� A O 4 f M P 0 00 N T O O w Y 7 v m 0 d 4H4YG • Cd YdTY .1 YL CO".I0 �ROOmti g A U 9 • w WY m A DNmq✓ O A U 9 tl w SG. O A <Y0Y 6V0 I I I xi XI I I I I I i I >d tl - 1 .•1 1 M1 M 7Yc e1 OG • .0> 19 •m 1 Y 7m MN OfA e-aF1 f7Y0 C O> J[C f04 V - OU OY CO V. q9 OR., 'k 00•.01 C•ci YR Ofl 00 YO 4ti •6 .1 Y7 OY f 00 wNC •400 M4yL�0 pOp,� w •r01Y ON 0.9 7Y OY'1 M LY Oit w 6b MC Y O O%yyy N 9~.1 OQo R••N1i O OF9 C'7 ON CN f r•m1O YM wi Y fo CU C L•1 YA.NCOYY6 YCP.g1 Y0a M4 �L ±0G fio 0+1w ON M✓G GYY mw Y Y 9 Y S •• 9M O•.1Y tl 7 .1047 ALM .1- MY X YN HF ✓U O N Y O Y• 0 ✓0 Y Y H 3 Y CO C "' Y .++106 ✓ VY O> •+1 AC O ANL U✓ �7 '�Y > Y YY 9flLM •1Y O P9 \0 MM 'IM •N✓9 tl.1 C .-i G PM1 • m Y Y✓ O i q G r•I G F C O F'1 C. 0 Y Y COLO G••1 �1 0 m 300✓ X7 E aE YO �� NYYYC. UT M•.1Y 00. Oq OM0. YPM1 w 'a wNr• YY OY U••1 Ute✓ OYC - •.1O wC C Y O N d ¢ C L C U O C Y a Y .1 G fl C • .1 �I q S m Y Y N Y O m U 3 CCN ✓ G Y ✓ w • m YH YT Y04 6••1 PN.1 YY Y•1 Yh C 0 fl +19 Co. MYM1 owl YUY MY DO YYw i4U YYN ■NM. -I N.�9a a0 C7 % •Yy Y✓m\ YGN NYT �.w HC a.y MO 0G0 D.1 4UY H 0 YC�1G LUL •00M1 Y Y+1✓ Y M ✓✓ 9 ✓MY UYU C✓NY ..Y N ATN Nq OOM MYA Y9000 Y✓a P P OG C9C NPH OYO•. Oa CN 7 Cd O m Y 4Y L70•. +1 Uti a Y GYYG 0.Y •9 Y MCO %T .1gMC NO Y Ggti VLG6 HO rO NqN O NGfl SMmFd✓q✓ H -L'• tiUY-. m Son W••1w NYm .[60q <AY wLA 7 G y G 7 Y C✓ v 0.+•.NM ON4O Nti A Y H x 0. g Y 0 Y Mau = H S Y A U 9 Y M Z 6 Y A a s Y A /Y a pGcNDA ITE -M, NO -w) PRGc � Or a I. II. III 1-23-86 c � FOR OFFICE USE ONLY YES MAYBE NO MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? X All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative declaration to be issued. DETERMINATION• The proposed project should not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. X Although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, it will not in this case because of the attached mitigation measures. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. REVIEWED PLANNING BY: i DATE • DIRECTOR: cam -DATE• D AC—EtZA (Tc41 ti0, _.:2�A PACES / or_ 41 r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED Negative Declaration 89-57 Tentative Parcel Map 25717 Industrial Project 89-12 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The proposed project site is comprised of approximately 15.29 acres of undeveloped hillside and is generally located at the northeast corner of Flint and Silver Streets in the northwest portion of the City. Land uses surrounding the project site consist of the Elsinore Municipal Water District tank facility to the east, vacant industrial property to the north, residential and vacant industrial to the south, and abandoned industrial buildings to the west. Vegetation on the site consists primarily of Upland Coastal Sage Scrub. Local access to the project site may be obtained from Chaney Street, Collier Avenue, Flint Street, and Silver Street. Views of the lake and surrounding community are visible from the project site. Current zoning on the project site is M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) and the Land Use designation is Limited Industrial. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As proposed, the applicant is requesting Industrial Design Review approval for the development of a light industrial park and a Tentative Parcel Map for the subdivision of 11 lots. Implementation of the industrial park would result in the construction of 11 concrete tilt up structures. Average unit sizes are proposed to be approximately 5,500 square feet with a total of approximately 60,985 square feet of industrial uses. Lots will range in size from 20,080 square feet to 2.40 acres. RELATED PERMITS/ APPROVAL NEEDED 1. Negative Declaration 89-57 2. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 3. Design Review of Industrial Project 89-12 4. General Plan Amendment 89-15 5. Zone Change 89-17 1. EARTH l.a. Unstable earth conditions may result during grading operations and post grading due to the alteration of the knoll to a relatively flat site. However, to ensure that unstable earth conditions would not result an approved grading plan subject to City standards shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to project implementation. therefore, a significant impact would not result due to the proposed project. l.b. The development of the proposed light industrial park on a presently undeveloped knoll would require a substantial amount of grading. As proposed, the project would be graded in two phases. The first phase would consist of the rough grading which would entail rough street grade elevations and rough pad elevations. The majority of the grading would take place during the first phase and would displace approximately 493,178 cubic yards of cut and 23,319 AGEPv'DA ITENA.( NO. Ste PA"Ji I "' OE- ` I r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 2 cubic yards of fill. The second phase of the grading would consist of precise grading, at which time building pads would be designed for appropriate drainage and building foundations. During this phase approximately 10,000 cubic yards of earth would be displaced. Therefore displacements, disruptions, compaction and overcovering of the soil would result due to project implementation. Specific mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. I.C. The proposed project would result in the re -configuration of a knoll with approximately 30-40 foot vertical height to a relatively flat site with 10-15% man-made slopes along the southern perimeter. Therefore, the topography of the project site would change substantially, from a natural vegetated knoll to a man-made site suitable for industrial development. Mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce the impacts on the existing topography to a level of insignificance. l.d. As proposed, project implementation would result in the re -configuration of the project site from a knoll to a relatively flat site. Therefore, the proposed project would result in the destruction of a unique geological feature. Mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. i.e. An increase in wind may occur in that the knoll acts as a wind barrier to adjacent properties. However, construction of the buildings and appropriate landscape measures would ensure that this impact would be reduced to a level of insignificance. l.f. The proposed project site is located approximately 3/4 mile from Lake Elsinore. Therefore, no significant environmental impacts in terms of siltation, deposition or the erosion of Lake Elsinore would occur due to project implementation. l.g. The proposed project may expose people or property to hazardous geologic conditions such as mudslides, landslides and earthquakes. These impacts may result due to the proposed grading operations and the location of the Elsinore Fault Zone approximately three miles from the project site. However, specific mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. l.h. As proposed by the applicant the project site would be graded to create a relatively flat piece of land with portions of the site having slopes of 10-15 percent. A significant impact would result; however, specific mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. All grading shall be done according to an approved City of Lake Elsinore grading plan. 2. Frequent in -grading inspections should be conducted during the construction of cut slopes and the keys for fills. These inspections are necessary to discover unforeseen conditions that may be exposed during grading. Any unanticipated adverse conditions AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PANE 17 OF � c Fd ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 3 encountered should be evaluated by the project engineering geologist and the soils engineer and appropriate corrective grading measures such as stabilization fills or buttress fills may be required. 3. All grading operations shall be done under the supervision of a licensed soil engineer. 4. All manufactured slopes shall be contour graded at a maximum 2:1 slope in an attempt to give the graded site a natural appearance. 5. To the extent possible, areas to be graded should be cleared of existing vegetation immediately prior to actual grading activities. The real extent of grading should be limited to that necessary for the creation of pads for the immediate development area. Where mass grading is necessary for balanced earthwork areas not immediately developed should be stabilized with plantings as soon as possible. 6. To reduce the visible impacts associated with the re -configuration of the knoll, increased landscape setbacks and planting shall be required during design review. Landscaping on the project site along Flint and Silver Streets and on the proposed street shall be comprised of landscape materials that are fire resistant and compatible with the surrounding natural environment. 7. If blasting is necessary to reduce the size of the knolls granitic outcropping both the County of Riverside Fire and Sheriff's Department shall be notified. 8. Single story concrete structures constructed on the site shall be designed to undergo ground motions of .37g. 9. Shoring is recommended in all trenches greater than five feet (51) in total depth. 10. The site shall be cleared of all obstructions and deleterious materials prior to grading. 11. Fill material shall not contain rocks or clumps greater than six inches (611). 12. Loose alluvial soil deposits that will support fill embankments or structures for human occupancy shall be removed to firm natural ground. Actual depth of removals will be determined by the project geologist during grading operations. 13. Proposed structures located within transitional areas between native cut and fill zones shall be founded on a mat of uniformly compacted native soils. This mat should be constructed by excavating soil materials five feet (51) outside the proposed building pad areas with replacement as controlled compacted fills. Over -excavation should extend a minimum of one (1) times the footing width below the bottom of the proposed footings. The exposed surface should be scarified to a minimum depth of six (6) inches, brought to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) relative compaction. AGENDA ITEM. NO. PAGE 13 OF ' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 4 14. The over -excavated area shall be inspected and tested by a representative of the soil engineer prior to replacement of fill to verify the minimum compaction obtained at bottom. 15. Structural fill shall meet a minimum compaction of ninety percent (90%) of its maximum density potential, based upon ASTM test designation D-1557-70. 16. Pipeline trenches shall be backfilled with compacted soil. Jetting of the backfilled material will not be considered a satisfactory method for compaction, unless approved clean sands are used. 17. Surface gradients shall be provided adjacent to buildings to direct surface water away from foundations and slabs towards suitable drainage. 18. Ponding of surface water shall not be allowed adjacent to structures or on pavements. 19. Compacted fill slopes should be backrolled with a sheepsfoot roller during fill placement at intervals not exceeding four feet (41) in vertical height. 20. Any add-on correction to a fill slope shall be conducted under the direction and recommendations of the City Engineer and the project engineering geologist and approved in writing prior to commencement of corrective grading. 21. Over -filling of the slopes are acceptable and preferred. The fill slope shall be constructed by over -filling with compacted fill a minimum of three (3) feet horizontally, and then trimmed back such as to expose the dense inner core of the slope surface. The amount of over -filling required shall be determined by a contractor and approved by the City Engineer. 22. Spillage of loose material down the face of slopes during grading and during drainage terrace and downdrain construction should be avoided. 23. Fine grading operations for benches and down drains should not deposit loose trimmed soils in the finished slopes. 24. All temporary roads created during grading must be removed in their entirety or replaced as properly compacted fill as part of the tract grading. 25. Compaction equipment on the project shall include a combination of rubber -tired and sheepsfoot rollers to achieve proper compaction. 26. No water must be allowed to flow over the slopes other than incidental rainfall. 27. No alteration of pad gradients shall be allowed which will prevent pad and roof run-off from being expediently directed to approved disposal areas. 28. Cut slopes that face in the same direction as the prevailing natural slope will require top of cut paved interceptor swales. AGENDA ITEM NO. 23� PAGE (q O= t I C r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 5 29. All berms shall be constructed and compacted as part of fine grading and shall be maintained by the property owner. 30. The property owners shall be responsible for the maintenance and cleaning of all interceptor ditches, drainage terraces, downdrains and any other drainage devices which have been installed to promote slope stability. 31. wherever utility trenches are excavated parallel or adjacent to footings and located within a distance subtended by a forty-five (45) degree angle (1:1 ratio) taken from outside bottom edge of the footing, all utility trenches shall be compacted to ninety percent (90%) of the laboratory maximum density. Compaction should be accomplished with a mechanical compaction devise. If the backfill soils have dried out, they shall be thoroughly moisture conditioned prior to placement in trenches. 32. All structures shall be subject to compliance with the County of Riverside Uniform Building Code. 33. If construction of the structures do not occur immediately after completion of grading and the soils in direct contact with the footings are dry, it is recommended that the subsoils be presaturated to optimum moisture content or greater content, to the depth of the exterior footings. 34. Parking lot areas shall be underlaid by a minimum of twelve (12) inches of compacted native sub -base material throughout. The minimum relative compaction required for sub -base soils is ninety percent (90%). 2. AIR 2.a. An increase in air emissions would result due to an increase of the 454 vehicle trips per day. However, this increase in vehicular traffic would not result in a significant impact to the current air quality within the City of Lake Elsinore. In addition, short term impacts on the current air quality would result during the grading process. To reduce this short term impact to a level of insignificance, compliance with Section 17.38.150 of Lake Elsinore Zoning Code would be required. This section states that all properties subject to mass grading shall incorporate measures to reduce dust such as landscaping, spraying of water, or soil treated with sealers. 2.b. The proposed project would not result in the creation of objectionable odors in that all business operations within the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) zone shall be conducted within an entirely enclosed building. Outside storage of equipment or materials would be subject to a Conditional Use Permit to ensure that the storage would not be objectionable in terms of odor. Therefore, a significant impact would not result. 2.c. Due to the location and nature of the project, there will not be an alteration of the local or regional air movement or climate. Therefore, a significant impact would not result. AGENDA ITEM, NO. C r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 6 3. WATER 3.a. Due to the location and nature of the project there would not be a change in the currents or the direction of water movements to Lake Elsinore. Therefore a significant impact would not result. 3.b. As proposed, the project would involve the reconfiguration of an existing knoll to a man-made site suitable for industrial development. As a result of this reconfiguration and development the existing drainage pattern would be altered. Additionally because of the introduction of impervious surfaces ( buildings, walkways, and roadways) the absorption and surface water run off rates would be significantly impacted. The incorporation of the mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. 3.c. The proposed project would not result in the alteration to the course or flow of flood waters in that the project site is not located within a floodplain. Therefore, no significant impacts would result. 3.d. The proposed project would not result in a change in the amount of surface water in any water body. Therefore, no significant impacts would result. 3.e. Discharge or alterations into surface waters may occur due to the introduction of an urban use on a presently undeveloped site. However, degradation of the surface water would not occur in that industrial uses which would have the potential to dump hazardous waste are not permitted in the M-1 zone. Therefore, a significant impact would not occur. 3.f. Alteration, direction or rate of flow of ground water would not result due to project implementation. Therefore no significant impacts would result. 3.g. A change in the quantity of ground water or the interception of an aquifer would not occur due to grading operations. No significant impact would result. 3.h. The proposed project would not result in a substantial reduction in water available for public use. Therefore, a significant impact would not occur. 3.i. The proposed project site is not located in an area subject to tidal waves nor within a flood plain. Therefore people or property would not be exposed to these hazards. No significant impact would result. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. On site drainage shall be conveyed to an approved public drainage facility. 2. Easements shall be provided for drainage passing over property lines, subject to approval by the City Engineer. 3. To reduce the impact on the amount of absorption and surface run-off an increase in previous surfaces are encouraged such as increased landscaping within parking areas and along set backs. Additionally, areas that are not needed for operation of the business shall be landscaped. AGENDA ITEM h0.��� r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 7 4. Parking of vehicles or storage of equipment shall be allowed only in paved areas to ensure that the leakage of oil, gasoline, or other fluids shall not leach into the ground water. 4. PLANT LIFE 4.a. A biology study was conducted which indicated that the vegetation on the project site is composed primarily of inland coastal sage scrub. Development of the project site would result in the removal of this plant species. However, as stated in the biology report, the site has had a series of fires which have created fire scars, burnt crowns and has caused considerable vegetative damage and modification. Due to this high fire activity, the maturity of species on the project site have not occurred. Therefore, a significant impact in the reduction of plant species would not result due to project implementation. 4.b. The biology study stated that the rare or endangered species Payson's jewelflower and Palmer's grapplinghook have a moderate to poor chance of occurrence on the project site. Implementation of the project would remove the possibility of these plants occurrence. However, given that these species do not currently exist on the project site, a significant impact would not occur. 4.c. The introduction of new species of plants would occur due to project implementation. However, landscaping proposed on the project site shall comply with the City of Lake Elsinore's Landscape Guidelines. These guidelines would ensure compatibility with the surrounding environment in terms of plants that are drought tolerant and suitable with Lake Elsinore's climate zones. A significant impact would not result due to the proposed project. 4.d. The project site is not being used nor is it suitable for agricultural production. Therefore, a reduction in agricultural acreage would not occur. 5. ANIMAL LIFE 5.a. A change in the diversity of animal species would result given that the site would be transformed from an undeveloped site to a man-made site suitable for industrial development. The biology study has indicated that animal life ( other than domesticated animals) is limited on the site due to the site's location to existing developments. A significant impact would not result due to project implementation. 5.b. The biotic study did not identify any habitats or sittings of any animal life considered significant or rare. Therefore, a significant impact to rare and endangered species would not result on the project site due to project implementation. 5.c. An introduction of new animal species would not result due to project implementation. ft AGENDA ITEM NO. +• PASEE ZZ C- 41 A C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 8 5.d. The biotic study has indicated that a specific number of animal species exist on the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the decoration of these animals. However, given that the existing animals are not considered rare or endangered a significant impact would not result. 6. NOISE 6.a. An increase in existing noise levels would occur in that a presently vacant site would be transformed into an active suburban use. These noise impacts can be divided up into short and long term impacts. Short term impacts would result due to construction operations while long-term impacts would occur due to project operation and vehicular traffic. Compliance with Chapter 17.78 (Noise Control) of the City of Lake Elsinore's Zoning Ordinance would reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. 6.b. Residents adjacent to the project site may be subject to severe levels of noise during the construction and operational phases. However, compliance with Chapter 17.78 (Noise Control) of Lake Elsinore's Zoning Ordinance would insure that protective measures would be applied during these phases to reduce noise impacts to an acceptable level. Additionally, industrial uses in the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) Zone are allowed only within an enclosed building. Therefore the proposed project would not result in a significant impact in terms of noise. 6.c. The proposed project site is not located within 600 feet of a freeway. Therefore a significant impact would not result. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE 7.a. The proposed project site is presently vacant and project implementation would introduce new sources of light and glare onto the surrounding properties. To reduce this impact, the back shielding of parking lot light standards, and tinted grass shall be required to reduce light spillage and glare onto adjacent properties. Therefore, a significant impact in terms of light and glare would not result. 8. LAND USE 8.a. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, a significant impact would not result. 8.b. The proposed Plan land use addition th Commission an conflicts wi objectives do impact would 9. NATURAL RESOURCES project is consistent with the General designation of Limited Industrial. In e project is subject to Planning d City Council approval to ensure that th adopted city policies, plans and not occur. Therefore a significant not result. 9.a,b. The construction of the proposed eleven (11) unit industrial park would demand additional draws onq� AGENDA ITEM, NO. 2�-- r e; r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 9 natural resources of the general area in terms of utility uses and infrastructure improvement which require the use of non-renewable materials. Cumulatively, the impacts may be significant; however, individually the impacts of this development are not considered significant. 10. RISK OF UPSET 10.a,b. In the short term, during the construction activity, the potential for an explosion or release of hazardous substances may exist due to the storage of fuel on the site to operate earth moving equipment. During the long term, some risks may result due to project operation in that the hazardous or explosive materials may be utilized or stored on the project site. However, mitigation measures imposed on the project would reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. MITIGATION MEASURE 1. The contractor shall notify the Fire Department of all combustible and/or hazardous materials stored or utilized on the site during construction activity. 2. All hazardous and/or combustible materials shall be stored per the requirements of the Fire Department. 3. Proposed industrial uses shall be subject to the requirements of the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) Zone stated in Chapter 17.56 to ensure that the storage of hazardous or explosive materials used in conjunction with an industrial use shall be stored in an area specifically designated. 4. Quarterly inspections shall be conducted by the City's Code Enforcement Officer to ensure that permitted hazardous materials are stored in their designated area. 5. A fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all buildings subject to the requirements of Riverside County Fire Department. 6. A combination of on-site and off-site fire hydrants shall be located not less than twenty-five feet (251) or more than one hundred sixty-five feet (1651) from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways per the approval of the Riverside County Fire Department. 7. The installation of portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC shall be required. 11. The proposed project will result in the generation of approximately 104 jobs (based on 1.7 employees per 1000 square feet industrial space [Trip Generation 3rd Edition 1982 Institute of Transportation Engineering]). It can be assumed that a portion of these new employees would be new residents to the City of Lake Elsinore. However, this increase in population would not result in a significant impact on the growth rate of the population in the area. Therefore, a significant impact would not result. AGENDA ITEM, NO. 3 2( '- PAGE � O' -LLL r c ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 10 12_ HOUSING The proposed project may result in new residents moving into the City of Lake Elsinore. However, given that approximately 14 % of the total number of housing units are vacant (State Department of Finance Housing estimates, May 1, 1990) an adequate supply of housing is available to new residents. Therefore, a significant impact on the current City of Lake Elsinore's housing environment would not occur. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 13.a. As determined by the traffic study prepared for this development approximately 454 additional vehicular movements would result due to project implementation . Given that the level of service on the existing roadways is adequate and the majority of the traffic would enter and exit from Interstate 15, a significant impact in terms of vehicular traffic would not result. 13.b. The proposed project would require the need for 106 parking spaces (Section 17.66.020,C). As proposed, the site plan indicates 115 parking spaces would be provided. Therefore adequate parking would be provided and a significant impact would not result on existing parking facilities. 13.c. As stated in the traffic report prepared for this project, the projected Level of Service (L.O.S.) on existing Collier Avenue and Chaney Street would remain at a L.O.S. A due to project implementation. Therefore, a significant impact upon the existing transportation system would not result. 13.d. Project implementation would require a new road along the northern property line and the improvements of Flint and Silver Streets. Therefore, alterations to present circulation patterns would result. However, given that the existing traffic and proposed traffic would remain at a L.O.S. A. A significant impact would not occur due to this change in traffic patterns. 13.e. Traffic on to the project site would be vehicular and would not alter water, rail or air traffic. Therefore a significant impact on these modes of transportation would not result. 13.f. Traffic hazards would increase in that the existing undeveloped site would be transformed into a light industrial park. However, existing traffic and proposed traffic would continue operating at L.O.S. A which indicates free flowing traffic where hazards are at a minimum. Therefore, a significant impact on traffic related hazards would not result due to this additional traffic. MITIGATION MEASURES Silver Street, east of Flint should be developed to its minor road classification, however, due to the low volumes projected on this section, the road should provide a 30 foot pavement width with curb and gutter adjacent to the site. Improvements opposite and past the site should be considered when those properties adjacent to the road are developed. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAC=E OF r c ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 11 2. Flint Street, north of Silver Street, should be improved to its minor roadway classification. The roadway should be provided with at least thirty foot (30') pavement width extending from Silver Street to the existing paved portion of Flint Street. With the low volumes projected for this section of road, buildout is not necessary, however, buildout at this section of Flint Street should be considered when adjacent properties are developed. 3. Driveways should be designed with a minimum thirty foot (30') curb return radius as outlined for industrial development. Throat width and length shall conform to City standards. ' 4. After completion of the project and not until full occupancy of the industrial park, a survey of employees and their commuting distance shall be conducted to determine the feasibility of car and van pooling. If the study determines that car/van pooling would be feasible the property owner shall provide a van for the industrial park and designate special parking areas for employees participating in carpooling. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES 14.a. Fire Protection Presently, fire service is provided to the project site by the Riverside County Fire Department. The potential of fire hazards to structures and human life would increase in that a vacant site would be transformed into an industrial use; however, the fire protection service to the site would remain adequate and a significant impact would not occur. 14.b. Police Protection The Riverside County Sheriff Department would provide service to the new development. Increases in police protection calls would result due to the alteration of the presently vacant site to an industrial use and will ultimately require additional police service as the development reaches maturity. The potential of traffic related accidents, car thefts, robbery, and burglary would increase; however, police protection services are presently adequate and would not be significantly impacted due to project implementation. 14.c. Indirectly, the proposed project may generate addi- tional students into the area due to the possibility of new employees and their families of the proposed industrial park moving into Lake Elsinore. However, this number would be minimal and would not significantly impact the schools in the area. 14.d. The proposed project may indirectly impact the existing park system in that the new residents generated by the proposed industrial park would use these facilities. However, this impact would be insignificant. 14.e,f. There are no anticipated impacts to the maintenance of the City's roads system nor to other governmental services. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3a PAOE,Le or r c ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 12 15. ENERGY 15.a,b. There are no anticipated impacts to the current supply of energy nor would the proposed project require the development of a new source of energy. No significant impacts would be caused by the proposed project. 16. UTILITIES 16.a. Southern California Gas Company has existing facilities in the area of the proposed project. Gas service would be provided to the project site from a two inch (2") main in Flint Street, approximately one hundred feet (1001) east of Hill Street. No significant impact on gas utilities would result due to project implementation. 16.b. Connection with existing' communication systems are available to the project site. No significant impact on communication systems would occur due to project implementation. 16.c,d. Water and Sewer lines are presently available to the project site. However, extension of these lines would be necessary to service the project site. No significant impacts on these utilities would result due to project implementation. 16.e. The proposed project would not have a significant impact on storm water drainage. 16.f. The expansion of the Regional Reclamation Plant is estimated to be competed in July, 1990. Therefore, a significant impact on solid waste and disposal would not occur due to project implementation. 17. HUMAN HEALTH 17.a,b. The proposed project would not create or expose people to a potential health hazard. No significant impact would occur. 18. AESTHETICS The proposed project would significantly impact the surrounding neighborhood in terms of aesthetics in that an existing undeveloped knoll would be graded down to site that is relatively flat and utilized as an industrial park. Mitigation measures recommended would reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The south portion of the project site shall be graded at 10-15% slopes to create the appearance of a natural hill. 2. All manufactured slopes and scarred areas will be landscaped per the City of Lake Elsinore's Landscape Guidelines and Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed industrial buildings shall blend in with the surrounding environment in terms of design, colors, and materials. AGENDAITEM NO. F GF �� r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - CONTINUED - PAGE 13 19. RECREATION A significant impact on quality and quantity of existing recreational opportunities would not result due to project implementation. 20. CULTURAL 20.a,c, A cultural resource survey has not been conducted to & d. determine whether significant cultural values or archaeological sites exist on the project site. A significant impact may occur; however, with the imposition of mitigation measures these impacts would be reduced to a level of insignificance. 20.b. No buildings exist on the project site; therefore a significant impact on a prehistoric or historic structure would not result. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. A surface survey shall be made of the site to determine any significant cultural resources which may exist in the development area and submitted to the Director of Community Development, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. In the event that grading activities uncover cultural resources, all grading activities shall cease and a qualified archaeologist shall be notified. AGENDA ITENM�. QQNO. [._GL Z -�+ 9 O m m C toC EQ ma to HC C .°i V , 4 FO0 CU m m•.iU Vww to r ,4 .4 > mU U AV0a,q.(a .,waro CO 4>14) m�m 0 UrowO+'i �tosw wAOC amwm mw mcm x,100% Om 0aro4).044V14 O+4i,4V>m•H ,070 V FAA4)Vmm0 CU,gm m0+ '0am0wmac .+vU •acam0r-+'� mmm OmmHw •.i3OA Vm,a mwC> -amr, 0%ONVUOm tvIm�V•.�m Oa. C +i0 +).CO mCC-H VV w mCmam 0'0 w a A 1 r. *r4 m 3\ a• 010V w 0 m C m 0, U A w 060 .+ m U C -14,0 0 i+a+ma ++0+ 0-+ro4-)434) awm > 000V mm -+ U 0 V M WCm 0)VwU,44) lO.w M 0 0 V 003vy O m7m "4+ 4-C C-1 O+mOC U0:5 VV -H 0)C••1m G1 b '0 A V '0 ++ ••a -0 •n m ••i .a w m ,q >, 0. m m w a, mC V wa 0%C m O Cb+a+0, 00 mm 0443mU 1 m N0433t VM.04)UVOIL))N0tooa HrotoU-��00 m C az 10 m m 10-14 az az > U 4 ) N 4 •i 'a n z44 d FmV za,a¢ zaa b UV>>,,mUr+dU. 010 zmN zmH C OU 0 P4 Ww Ww Www H w w O ErWiO ENO E+ CC u ,C '0>,.im0'1 u UU m C AGE!4P `, ITE!,-, i 7. 32t - '0 O 10 m m 10-14 mo > U 4 ) N 4 •i 'a d FmV k0Ui4m b UV>>,,mUr+dU. 0 ACNAIm+C,•Mmrt b . asm>,m ONma Cw amen ,4V 0.� mC CC OC41 ,C '0>,.im0'1 0O+ ro� m0kVVA0aw b0 U 0 0 G �V A•�.I O+ m 0 C d UC .a000URl,C14k ,-IO V 0 +I .i 0 V a 4) .i m dGb10 mro 0V-Hw:3 �C! 0m mm9019004 ma) � U>,.00`1 ma ++C 0U AO O+U -HCC -.+Lm .i.� 0 01-1 0 �C ,-1•q -HO m obi 1.4 b� .� m 'O V m m 0 .•4 w •.i w +o (a 14 1OmmmOOww m .CW wc,cwON4m0 A 4 m M0E 0C0O+UO 00 m txq a CV a O+m•.4 O+c �. Y'r. .4 $$44 $4-H M 10 4 b VV.•1w0%m w• -1N0 Rfm 044 C ,-1 m V m w •,i m rt •.>+ C O y c44 0 C 0 C 0-H`¢4 in w70+i0C9i1Nm .-la av wvw'oro m m m m w 4 m E ri N l7 AGE!4P `, ITE!,-, i 7. 32t - AGENDA, iTL%', NO. )L r M a >' $4 H x me 41 0 O tp 3 'm0 m V Y wt C .. m y •.� N •� a 4.7 m N 00 -0.4 w 0 2s A O c +t a O c >, O O V a .a JJ w >, b A14to$49 ro U.i c> 0 1 ro m a ++A a ro 0 r 0+0• Ei.ir+y a 0•.t 3 b+a $44-)C >VAa 4 E Aacc aro0ak29c+1 b+ to ++ .•t '1 a +J +t +4 m .a U> c m a m -H 0 to'Ido ccw Acro'-tamto�amca0c41c.0 -4 00 to a) a.t aFoWm•oo V-4$4-H�4$4A�aaa �0 maY+cr+� .tbo,a4) O•+ 4j >+a 4.)3ro Aa :+ b A .t•�a $4 is c+�Av m m $4v laJ4.) 4) 4J OE 0+a -•� c 0 c a c 0 n a.t a N to m a.tAbb 3 m otro 0 c c aro 0 At+ -•tam A0 -.4004)43¢0 z aroam 0$4 b cloy isam+t .toAU-H Noa r4 A v-Ha0+m tom VmaaV vvImro 4J—ica a >.m0 4)444)c> -M>aaAOU-•taro c0aa.4 O O Y a.4 -H c+40 .4 O N V VF -4 w m$44.)$4+4 m$t tP'H m.4 En 14ca10,V-M'0$4 Qw:1.4 a0 Om 0.02:1 4Aro4) ►� Ua0Q14010AaNq'O>440wW-Hgo m41roa> x ,,4 40acYta oac•�cacAcai+3aac+4a1w0 aamooa0+ro Utda.400•0WV4)>a0+.4a19Na-O a �n wU E4 z �U wa �~7U aoa° wOI zmH .7On z°` Www o Ham° o>iN °ca°a z U U W 02 a roa b$ �ro b mldCV o a o m 0 Nto ay $4 0) �R4) m.0 " a Y m.d m s,-14 4°1to ' N 0 W 0> Lmi0akia0 00Qa [ ott adoc°$4>ro 041 A $$444.)aa+wv c ,4 4 m A 4 0 - 1 + >. O a cAVV .am 04) 0m041 mO m4J Va 0 v U m it a m 0 0 m U m a m m m a 0+ mv�'4V I-4 a m a 54 .4>-4s m -Mu -w°a+o" m''a 00 Mc° OV roAm baro - `m xC.�4awato ro)`44 a to V 3 4) 044 0 .4 9 10 40 tp .. 4j 3j Vw a A 0 m 'O m 41Nro x0Nm 0.9 4) r. 0N 4)'O� Pal C0c M00 � 0 v 0 w 0 O .4 % V 0 0 10 V E 48m Et000)U3:00 n E N y tL1 AGENDA, iTL%', NO. )L r �� OFA! am � d Ec c w3ai 041 044 t7% to • v ro W U 7 W C •-a m 0 N 0) 0+-- A r; 4 �7m roCm C'0--+0 1-4 0:50)ON-14m U to ro •-+ m t) ro 0) '0'0 U C w -+ • w w •a to •-I 0) it go O O .0 .0 c O •.•r m .0 0) O •-r = 0) 101-4 B 0 0 C JJ m +r ro V m '0 C +) m +J L+ to Ca tom oma. -r0 0 .gym 0 ro C rr C .4 4.)C A to -H --r 04 m 0l 94 11 -r00 A -4r ON wm:3 yro 00+)ro U --r W to 0 • --) 0 -H U A -i •-+ 0 U -H (1) b ar W-44 11 m3cvm4) -iia '0 39 0) 0) ro A--m4j 01 O m.Cw to 01-•) ?+ 00 •-r •-r w 90 U 11 1) 0 O 10 U 0 :+ m Aj O -a C a -i ON C O+ 0) C 0) C -H M .0 C •-i a a0c) w C 0[� roi it° °Cv I amto 4J 0 -Cf -%1 iv -H ro $49-1+ O Z k'0 -i aro•-a ON ro 11-4 O b --r m O -a d k .•+ 0 .-r H D ee o"i C a--+ z a oa .0-14.0 s, x a•-4 a o v o .c � m w o -� .c .q o •.+ E3a1 aceto mromma+Na°9 EaoR >4 E -1 E Z E+ Z E+ -. N N N M M EM a4 E-4 Z�!TUj >4 O 94 w E w :Dmaz o N U z z W o>o � wHw N U wHw z 1)o m : w vo uo pa a! O ro w m14� - ar C o to ��wm4r.w A w 0) CU w A C ° A G Yt7%0 --°+ 0-i y i.) 0-4 O 0) 0) C .-4 R 4.) V •-1 m k 1-i 0) f4 •-/ 0) >, m 0) O ro 3c�o V `4cm 9 U� w 0tv 110 ° -4V4mro0 is w 0 --r '0 .0 m 0) U C N 0 to rob H 11 4) V 14 A 0) 11 0 0) --i 0) •-1 to 0 4J 0) 11 C w A Oto U04 NH rlm 0) U� C 110)4)4)004) U to O 0) 0 H $a •n it --i A 0.4 a m m fa rocUaw4) 012 w 4)d $44 4.) aC V �14.) R4 NA m c aP414.0 � v cw D O ro 3 y w c cm°644ai m y4c At ova U A ro 0 0) 10 R7 ro .�m9o+ro'Ow 0)UV1 wC '00 AC• -)C Cro 0v 0)O+ CN •-I V V •-) 11 )0 a U 0 Fo H •-� 0) m 9044J--40 0)0c Um C •-)wrorod O C ro C0)+i > ° O U Oro° aN W 11FA -H 0) V 0) C 'O 4J b --) V w m 0) - o i) --r C 0)0 V O+9 w $4 ..- 4401$411 c cro 0-- m m 0) ro 0 •-) a+ 0) --r ra 0) w -j R UH11 >14C v01'0'0 11(a 0 w 0649 -iaroC m -Ha) C Od z -00+03'140V 0 ro 11m -r 4) m Cw z Sa w A --r U -M +) A -i 0) --1 m 0) m $4 d O CY>'0 11> O>V C+)rn O> ►'r O O 0) 0) C 0) 0) C w C •-i O +f •-) n •H R EUm)a0AWO) N,S49c M?A .0 mw b N E N �O r CO 01 �� OFA! tp -H 4-1 •.i `•.� C C wO mC0 4444 4 wy•m� wGOG 0 4) m ro to 0 '1 t 0 O -'i .0 4) 0 •.i U •'1 V A ,C --1 4) 43 V k .N 4-) 14 'O 4) V0 U.ia 13m a yam a V to 4)0 0 C .•e -'4 A. 4) C A 0 0) 9.0 m 4) $4 43 0' m r4 A r. 0 04-) 4 M 0 V M m ON a -+ 4) ro 3 0 0 U '1 0) U -H 0 43 4-3 'o A C U •� 0 3 a b 3 a 'o 'O +4 +4 m m= i3 m m i 4) C a1 a >rom i4V •:3-H $49UO OroUO 01000 O Cm ?. it •-1 a •-1 $4 $a A c N ,C c •-1 i+ 010 H No H W3••• V 4J OA ro V toy .0 WC UA m a 0-H`3 a m w •-1 •-1 v G -+ ro a -•+ ro a a -•a j3 H o tom W V 0 0m-10+ rom.10+ p'or4 a E n c 4) ro m c w••+ c 04+4 '••t'•1 c m HO 01 roA 4) C 4) 4) to s43 m ro 043 0 `4 to t0 z a 4 .a V '4 04 G -•1 0--1 4 -•1 0 ++ .0 a c •-t 4) Ha- 0 4 E+A00 E•tAU0 EEAm3a zH °zH >4 z z H °ate in 14 °auw °aUw z M M N H N M M\P4 M\z mm mala aU aU o.az Jaz �P4 mak. °°H0 �t�itH7 Z 4444 w44 P:.Uz P.0 FA W W (y O N° M° H44 H W UO 44 UO Ito Q U U a 4.)br. o 4.3 ami $4 403 a r-Ir4o•m+ k'o0m0>Q'a'os40 v -A to ON to 4) -4 O a 41 a) to •4 44 .0 .0 0 'o m to 'O •-1 m •'t 0) C A m (a V .•4 '••1 C •-i •-+ ro• Y O 44 c- a a ,.) 040 to a ,c w 04 m C,-,4 a m a Lt >, 4) 4) C O E 0 i -i . 0 1a O c a O U 'o ON 044 y VII -4 '+ it it V ro 0 ,-1 0, C. •-I (a C -H— 0. U C •.4 U a (d .-a V w 4) . 0 •.144 m V 0 0 V a a to U •-1 A m 'O a) a) C V •-t U >a maaa) m .-114r+'aC4a10 v 0 U V -n C .-t -H •-t +i 01 O Y A 0 V U Ve)x1000 (a -400a4) 00(v yC to .40'0)4 NrommAU4444R WV" m -rf X '1 0. y A 0 0 014.0 U a 410 U 3 c m 0) o+'0 a ato 0 oroo IV 4) c >ca)s660 -04t)$4 $4 �3a'OA .4m-H-Hm010.e0a -itp Rf0CY ,C0VV00 V 0 0 00 -a c 4.0a Vcrorow •.t 43 ,aU> too -•t u 0>4 -H0C>010Co00 «ri 3Nto0Mga°0acc4 444 y.: m0Im 0 34 C 2 +3 44 'O to F-4 0 x r1 4) 44 to rt -0,4 t) mm4CM v -+U .0$4 430e W $4 13W V am:3E0 U 12.4cc3 c� ro Om 0!av -A olaa 010010'0x0ae 01 m r.9 b +3 ro 4) 43 .•1 C O 'o'0 U V -j 4) -H V O r-1 rl U U CYro 000-1 x0mmCrn U H HammUm41AOUv'j 4) '•14 •. a)41>4Vt6�w �d %x °m0Ea0V° 0UL m�4) q4) 4) V m -.+ 44 .0 V V C a 'o 4 $4 d ,-p to .1 M M 000 m�0)O-4 mVaU ,tea ,-I 000r4r a>wc- aC3CMV$4 to ro C `4 V --f "'t it -'-1 -.i 0 to a1 m E 4) m 0 ro > m •-t 'o V 43 C U U M to •-t 14 O .c m a $4A :3VV 31 to m to a ro c s 0 0a O 0 V .•i C m $4 c 4) 41 11 0 -4 • a a >+ R 07 -H v r+ 0) > d CT 'O w 01 !L A ••+ V m a V o -a 43 fa roN ro 0r1 a c 0 0w430o+0a0 aV a aroa+ mm -044$4M0= -.+ac my 4)001>C 04)43.-4 >w -MCa'A z 4) '••1 t0 m ro ►t o --i a 3 (d a 4) .c ro V• j -,i C O a1 :-a .•t 4) o A a 3.t 0 4-3 a 0> Y U 4) O a V M L 0 -.1 w o 6 0) 4) a w 4) .0 ••1 -.i X.0 O 12 .44 a Ea '0 k.o+ A W V p44pm442t0V44ro00 n H O H e-1 r•1 '•I '-1 Ll ON ON c e c Hmi b A b A C -i is Ox sa 4) VV 014) o+aJ 0% V ,.) u IT Y H -I -a 10 00 m 0 m 0 m of -a p m •� 8 U -a w V +1 w Y -i w 4J -a .0 >, 3 w) 4a -H/ O •HI .0 4) 0 "4.0 01 0-414 4) 0 -i .0 01 m H 4) O •Ha .0 4) mmmea'a 0 Vmy0 iJm+J',:7 41w a mroua VrA m •HI .Cm 4)C.Cm 0CAM 4)C.0m ♦J Ha Cm 4)C.0m - H V00 m0V it m0V 103 00V03 -H 010ro m04J Ia 0m�S CAs$a3s roU3s z 31a vU la ro°3E to ,C 0 0) H 4) Ha 0 Hi N N W 4) H n •°amaa)uo o(aU0 0M00r. 00000 4Uiroo0 oRuo z H W sa C -a $a .0 C -1 $44 C -HI sa X C -a -n 4) U +I $44 C -a N d4) 0V Com 0V C4mro4J Com 4V 0V V GLM Aa-) a m 4) 1.4 ,a A 04 "4103 m -a 103 04 '1 to U 4) 4) A -a 103 O Ia C. MH4 M 4) M 01 0 M 4 ON d ?A r4 0+ O.4) W ON 103 mHi 0+ E n iggae'l C C W� C 00.4 0, p -1 C M -H MO 4)bsY 4)1084 0)08i 0 1084) 00m4- 4) 008aJ z C C O O•.a C Ha . A H A H 0 -.a .0 C C -HI A H 0 -Hi 0%4 E4)440s E 0408 E40,00 E0400 E -H 11 E-4 040A a c� nP o t >4 nF z Z>+ M Oa GUa cUa OUa W oVa N a n z as a w a w a w y a w H H NM H\W H\W H\W z MaW mala DU D.az D Daz H p0 HOO mH mR,'M m.SH mR',H mE M C0 W E Z H w w w U z w U z w U z z w w z Q z WO WMW WHW WHW H WaW iL O H H W H W H W O H w z u U0 u0 u0 uz H H a D m ro o 4) vA � 4-) o i m •,4 W r V a.) Ia 04.) ° LO 0 R a4) in M°C • R C H a G o ai A a) u '0 s+ 0 1 s H o y Im 4J V A C 0 8 -a O O Ha - 4 It ro -Ha C ON W '1 o V U -HI v 4.) C 4) 3 -HI -HI w U>,C 3U f.€S -HI 3 4) ro04 103410 x A 4)raIa o FO a 4) 8 04 -HI -a 4J H 0, U o sa Hi 4) R a-) N 0� m 41-a la b fi W 10 1-1 Hi H4 04)8 OC4) 3H40 n 4s H-I41ro a) 4) ••a U 0) C it U ro >. 4) m O C U ON 034 m q,4 sro-4 4)V 303d .0RC X04 Ca+s asm Hi10o4) ro0oto 4) U4)F4 -HiC Q14) HisW m 4) V Y8 toU4) 4) 4) ••� ro -a p ro $4«-1 O 4) A A> -a W ro ro -1 4)p C> Hi AHJJ -a KJJ AC 4) 0 4) >4) m A 4) 0.0 «-I 8 (a m 01-4.0 $4 0 b Hi A+ A -4 H-4 O >4 s 4) b Ha V to to 3 m Ha ra H-1 m w M V A -i 4) 04 ro to C to Ha .� rt •HI m w 8 0 4) $4 .0 0 H -I -a - C4)f4 VV 4)At ro 4)U103 m 044-0 m .0 4) 4) -a .00 >, C A to 3 $4 O Aw ° Ar 103V> 8444 HOP4w41 4)) w v 4) 44 0 O H -I V Hi p y m -a 4) W0aJ H C. la4)0C esmm b4) msa4) R H.-.0 r..00b A A 3$4 0)OW 4)r♦ to *P 04 0V%44) 0 V M 0 aro ro >H .Cop 0 P OP -4 4) 4J 0 k 4) -HI -a0 00% mw-aU m4)m UU H$40 v4)°rt C i Wp mWA to 4.) H -I ro 'o $a ri 9to 70 AColo 'Hf CCcm> -ororo HH-Iloa+ U 4) +4)A 4)+100 go m MNC X m a.) V U $4 4) M A V m 0 W -Ha D 04) CA H>4 VVroM M C WV VPC m 1 $a 4) to 4) H 4) 0 M 0+ m O O ro 0 4) R $4 0,8ro fa aA 0h ra b tn'l v 4) 0 4) 4)0)0)4) p -+ C 4) 4)CV b+G 4J4 -4U >)aUC a -)>.V -4 go to U -Hb C4) Umx 0 10.14 U a.J G H ..a m 103 ro ro -.+ U IV d 4) z /a Ha la 4)4) 01Hm4) wHaC rob M0 4) 04 V C V a -HI C H w -HI 0 C r 8 4) V H ties am°O� R Fak0 MAw a°fe U°mc n H E a! to b n m 01 H ri H H H H H AGENDA t EV NO. 3� r 04 pap0 pU q} v v v '4 v1-4 -O 14 Im 41 •Aw 4.0 4J z 21 -H to •4 N wv-4N 3 N 3 w0•�4 0 -4 .F 0i F $4 ai F $4 4n 0 -4 .0 0i vv$+ 004)$4 000$4 vv$+ 44 N 0 -4v U 0 -4v U 0 v N 0 OF.CN 4)0FN 440FN 4)9.CN NOY4 U4)roro 04)rofo N041(a 04-4 4) 4) 04-4 0 U •'4 4) Ra4.43a mC" aC0-04 0H3e >-40r FH 19 CHaF>'4 4)F O Oro UO -4 00 -4 00 Oro00 T, $44C -4 tT U -4 tT U -4 $4 r.C -4 H M ro4J 4) F v O F v A 90 a a -oro 4)-40fo 4$-40)ro a -oro O ro N .4 t7+ -4 '0 $4 t7+ -4 47 $4 t7+ fo N .4 tT H 0 F 04-4 N r4 O -4 N -4 O -4 F 04••4 HO 4)100v m 1-Htov 4)roa4.) z$4 A '4 0 •.4 F 0 C -4 F 0 C -4 .0 r4 0 -4 Halla 0 Om -4e Halle 004 a a O H v zE °z a H M z z HU' y uai avw H01 H M)az fn�H CO P4 W W Z H z H H 4343 Hw U U U 44 ] O 004 P] w N O ro N �+ d� 0 4J vi F 4) N F A$4U00 -4 4)0 -4 A>- 4)$4 O .0 7 w U Q, Po (a .4 b 4) •.4 'O v N $4 O H 4-) $4 O H 4)y 4) 0 4) H 'O O N 4) .1 14 Aitm O4J449tO .0 NC 4) 004 UO 10r 0000 4)v ro FZ q0 F$4 r-1 F •r+ roit4)A w 3 v $4 O+14 +14a)w0 a) w 0 eA04 >, o4) 0 t7+a9 v ro4)v 4)04 0r4A 4 U fa r. F .+ 140 .F 9 0 v -4 N a rl -4 4) (a-4 -4 NLS r4 0 NOF$4 Q 44)Nro10 UN b bforo CU 4-4 U••4 O to O F 8 .F 4) to F N ro $4 4 N 4)4)0•"4 40-4 9 4)N> w4) 10.4 $4'00+ Na a $4 F $4 a s ••4 4 o vv -4 mo 4) 0 0044)0 $4x'0$4 4) 4) N0 Uv v0 1-410 tr 0 A IS v 4) a .F 4) v 4) N t7+ to U 0.0 N C V t7+ C U w $4 A v tP-4 A F -4 fo 4) N 10 0 C -4 tv c 0-�o fafo o (Pa -4 a w Wy$4)44)C roro G.ro •�-I0 O-44$$44 $4)44 .00 '00 4) w -4 $4 $4 tr roN o k fo is $4 4) -4 $4 .0 V a 3 -0 'O U O A $4 $4 'O O 4+ a 'O foo 4) N4)4)C 0%w --I 0 4 4) C4) 4)4)F> 4)av0$4F0 0ONV W v>,w 4J$4F 0 t4 .0 -4 -.4 a 0 0 0 -4 v -4 F '4 4) 4e v 0 -4 0 4-)-44J v 0.4 10C r-4 0 $4•.4 0 a N 4) 4) Fv•'4 V '00 .4Na>1r. 440 4)$+o FO $4$+v 0 4 v F b 4) 4) N a .•4-H -4 $4 v a C 0 0 U -4 $4 $4 U 04)F>$4 x40.4 q4 41 roVto -4.4 vro v4)4o -4.Froo$4 4)r40fo4)1 F s v NF04 FAla, vv $40 4-4 4-)Na40 'OF id -o4) 04 U $4040 vw.FFF4)0 4)F0 $4-4 a a aa0 0$4004 4104)> Nro-4 ON 0$4(a a$4U $4 4) 4) 044 w 4) -4 N 'O 0 04 O v 04 0 N i4 'I -4 r. 0OE3 0 �44 w 0r'110 $44)44>4 r4GE 004 .0a0 , A. p7 U O ON F 41 Im t7+ O .0 O A -4 mto O a F 4c F FFAV 4-4'04-) C '4 a w C O D F'OW 4) •.4 -i vO 00N -ova $4F FO$4 to O 4) 41 a - 4 'O '•I ^ 4) F 4) $4 F 'O O O -4 V 0-4 a I m>4N4) r44).4- N0C$4 4)0%0 aF'O a 4) -4v -0vv-4U -4$4-44hOO.40 IDU $4 0 #0 4) V 0401 '0 4 t7+ F U - w $4 414 `-' a s �i 4) a 04 0+'0 .F 4) 01 U U F> fo :s0 0 4) 1 4) 1 x to4.a4 F r4 F F •4 ' N v> a to '1 0 z to .4$4 w $4 v 4) 0 -4 .4 -4 •.4 4) 0 •'4 O a 11.0 -4 O >.000 4) 4) 0 4) 4)v t7+ •4Nro GOC '4ea ae.0 H FO.C4)0 >$4>a0,C4)F 040$4 -4,C-4 x44)0 00U CUvt7TU 0a0444JHOW yb'O W M 4 U40 t7 H E M N N N N N N AGENDA t EV NO. 3� 1 m .a u H 3 A 3 � woo O +roa m O..a 0o +a Q to 6) N U% mmy H6) a a 0 E-1 w a z H z M a H m e e G N •, m .. broa �C b+ N 4) N Y E Em U V >, O+ a W b+Y m a •.a Y W d Y H m -A d O N N •.a w •.a .4 A ra w +a1O O •.+ w Y —4w •-a 00 N 44 N $4 14 000 C0 to VA • 0•.4.04) o ado@@o ow 0.00 mYN1a UH YYsa 4)Yiarola a)>40M . 0)Z.Cto E)4)14 Y4)CraON d=.0maACA0Y0to�q mNYro6)4)A0 mOYro mNYroO 6) 4.) VA $4M a •.a 6) .a -m 4) +a U •M 6) a ••a 6) ••a w 04-) O N Q) a � d3SY w b 3s 'a 4)XaVO4)U>4 as >.(W 6)H 6) U U0ra0o3> >.46)a0mA0 >r-IG)a>.•i0)O a14a."IU•*i0A Ort U 0 O 0 6 U0 0••I U O E O O m ro aY N ••a a +a 6) .a M $4 ,a 9-11 14 •.a a -•a Y •.a W a U ro ro >, 10 a3roYN.01c aNroY a3roYmYa•'a••aaHYQ) a ••a OU d > •.a a .+ ro a ••a to a U W V d o $d ••a amH0%ONV 10 roN.-)ON 4NHb+0ro .404J+a6)44 m any ro a O4•'+ 6)00V 4<MSY°03v 00'414 •-aa>Oa41 E040�S0Xto EA.0a EOf0A000tAAQaH04c zH zH z aUw aUw °4EWO a a Hz04 �Hz mHH �M1sa W H W W W W W w O w M W H a H O U W � o UO UM U x U +a A 3 3 aro) O b is caro H na rod .a Aro m N ARO Oa .i fa m ra W •ea to b 444 Nod 4)co 00, 044400 to $400 b+WY b la b roa6) a0Y U 44Vd O to N a -.a a b OY .1a>. Y d '-I ro>Y m $ma 600) u 00••00 .a b roH d �a 0-14 k z 3 d v 4 u Y 7 U m ro W O a oa YY U d d H 1a +1 •ra b� � 1Ni AS mH A 3 Y 6) 6i aad .) O r-4ro m m 3 U m to r-4 wrosa m O Y M 04 c ro YaU $4 In ON m dau o r -I •14 to ro •a > 0 Y 6)> ysaro U as N roA b Y d Y >. UA It a� 0 O 9 a U •^i ro cc to •.+ bs A A0 Y �4 C .roa O m U da Aro .•1 a, ri a N ro •.+ v m ro 3 H O gm 01 f� 04.) vasa 44 04 -4 O 1•a . w H 0 04 o+ N PD: - OF.1� m al '0 3 ro m •.+ y $4 H 41 r•I tr O C rto a, G 0 M mI V too w 0 •rto A. o 0 00940 A O m •rI 4) U +I a Q 4) V $4 m C r I a dm Ila ri V 10M �Yb+ UCOL'mAm+i 4)rl0C $4 -4 y y ro 0 $+ ro W C4 0 0 'O C -'+ O .l 4) U 4) a U •rl .r4 •V •4J Wr•4033009 ba+ y . Cr•IV 3>+ 4) Cmro :3Va W r1 rt4)C00A >-H4)Im Am "Moo mUO C O Oy-H C m 4r C `4 o >+'0 i+ r1 'J 4) b O +I N 'a !,+ y ro ai +'I a� 41 0,"4 y • 4 4) a o0U-+roV W"4 Mq+Ia > +)H O U04)r4M104)W 10Ay 0r4 A -r4 •n -•i rl ""q m m $4 r4 4 m N 0 *4 0 RV 0 0 v 0v r. 4 A,royro z ,C w $4 O -H 14 11 O 49 0-0 044 -H4) E00,00>04C Ero043 4m3a EWa GUW C o-? i"I 2XE o-~H7+OW HH 14o�o 1243 004H L) 14 to W rrk 44 Z�z °uw° NwW H° o W UQ U a m d G a) O 4) +Ci •114 b 4 O m .0 0AOro0 r-IrdON 'U'0C � m•r+0y t4JWr4 00..00>49 O 3 (1yy0 y`4 V m ri y H W C V Id 4) •rl N 4 -rI y d m- +1-rIA >41 dal Oy b $4 u 4) ro •r1 4) C m U to •rIU b U 4) Ot1arV mb04 Car4'0 CO U'0>+yN W 0.c0 ro r44.)04)a C go 0Ci1roC yya aro al y'0 m0 ••l to ►+d 0 040 0 CW ror♦U ria+ V 7y ri 0 is 'a G ro Ob a ++ CL O M 0 V C A U >,CL al R4 4) 0A 0 4) a 4 C C ra to O -I $4C V44)day 0V mi1 Ob •4romU m al to 0 ro y 4) M U -+ , d U r•1 ova N CV V >-4 mV 0X3ri43 `4 bromNL1 ocv 9031a+4)11to r•Im oo wa+aa) M`1 C '0 0 m a s '0 •r+ •rI V as m a+ G V m ro 4) k b V a 0 >� 044 O gg 4) -H� 4r to $4441 mrHi m4J -4j U i1 Am U a m U Lt a 0 0A N m ro C ro 4) ro to V 0 0 -I to >4 4) 4) 0 4-) 0 W ON M 4) +f 4 i.t UV OA y ri A 044 'm 44 UCW.-t C A W ro CO a O —A 0 04 go A'1 -, 0 +1 ld .i o°ai m d CD m0 yy.em o ra a) C 0 b> 'O 0.0 U y O $4 in 4) J.) A 1.) 0 to c 4 9 "q .-4 A 0 0 $4 V mar ri 0 C w 4-rtCd) Urowmmr'IroW 0 A90 0Mgm4) mC04) C i V H=C +-I Aai1 41$4 ro 'O A 4) m >1 :5 00 0 4.1 +1 ri m 4.) -A 0 c 0 to m $4 0%V 004.0 r -I k U 3 .0 o •rl $4 mi yC$4 4V my dim w 4JUP 4) 0-r1oaU '04)AC 4> 0$4V 4) C 4) 0 >44J W O C W ri m N m •ri at U V 4) y CG0'C y 0 $44)0:3 4x40 a Cy0MWX .rI 0 0 43 $4 O> ri 4) m O W 4.) A 7 4) to k A r4 W 4J —= 4) ro U dial +i it C y V .4 >. C dt A 90 N O y o m m 4/ m •'i 4.) o A a >+o m r4 7 U >1 U V ••4 A N UJ.)A ay A4 V 0) C C d 41>4 ^tri 0 0V m 0 C 3 >+ 00 ro +a -^•0 o >. Upp v 3.1 0 V a a A. ro 0 +) ►1 V m V .-1 •ri'ri m o N ti m 0401 C goo oCa)m -H 0C'0-HVVVAv $44)ro0)r4 >4)C�-s-)CU UV y0 r. -4 i1�� P40 r. ,4 UIQ 304 ea 41- 0 040 -o mU a 010 0'tV N 4 10 L1 4) V .cm 'O O ro rI 4) O O 7 LI 14 4 W E C 0) L4 4) Ea'0'Om romt+ro0,00004 4V Hrt-H$40.0 n E o ri N M n M AGENDA M:i;liNO. 03 Ol % t n N °aa it H H H9O�r M a z zsU aOiH w w m 0+ m w r.44 >4 >4 ° oz�H ce .ai1•IN �41 UOG Pu O H° HM x°41 607 U roro3ai U to 43 OC a $4 A $4 k V •1i W O d'mtmim romm G treC > 41 to v� wcoo woad UC-1i=Ovkc0 it li 0-A0-Hi Oddm m040i m -aUamw 10 v r4.140 1004$4 ak0Um= vdmd 404.4 = 0 mm -no -i mkvtr m a= dr44 0aOom mtro-1i mma0 �I.avd $4 k A$4 vv vo-H d-.Im 01-iam ma .0V H"4 0.1iUv bC3a 44 r4 C.-i=O m C1)10 mm to mm =0001-i 3+4 > to m > m 01 > m =W44"4 d 04) a •.i m O Cm C o0V-H oc00 mvvx d z k O+ O "1k O+ C o v k d C •1i m d m >,ri H a c U .= 0i a d v "q a l-1 d v 10 k k .-4 v 0 a w01004 a-14 v$4 a -ia a• a1id 0000kk•.4 o .POA :m+ a dv1-4 0 dmv d 1-itr UUv-4mm> c+ n H 1•i .0 m = m m m a -H -li +i > v a NO m-Hidvd and= -1i 4)1)a41 mw= v00 za 4)4)r. x0.0«40) $4$4 Ali 0A 9.1.10-H .=wOwm$4x Q > Oa E+Am311 E4A0+1 E+m00 Ei06H.4av A J .i d ri to rry 4.) ti �+ $4 w m k 4.4 O 0=) r. A k of a °ki 14 44 3 0 V r i v m>m0 °i 04 ty, M m .a 4 >>,Ov C w w O O O O C O+ 0 t +i +=i3AA XO?dU k .-1 d to to 1-i m m a dH.-4 4 F.i P4 0 Ki l0 N a AGENDA < i Er:, NO. 3011 PA )� Jl OF11 n °aa .H7 z H H H9O�r Nolo z zsU aOiH w w r.44 >4 >4 O>H oz�H UOG Pu O H° HM 607 U U U C k W O G ° > C 4 a O it li O a m a- > C >+ m --'f 144 -.-4 d a O —4 11 -14 U 31•-4 m C A 04.) k W-,4 v d to A 'iI U= a m U 0444 ON C v d 04004 m10nG.�O dw>$4 •.i m C m y A to •.i >,mv a to O+ to m UFO C A>14>, 0 CA w01004 V �' a ° v ro .POA :m+ a H m CSmiHm00 r-llaa-Fr•i 'kU> d OamUO 4)4)r. $4$4 V1)+im > Oa aamd aU=+i c (44 0, d+idAk 7 d m°y m U 10 m m tvw mwa H '44 mv 41toc0 .a4)4 m Ay .iUFm >v C404'4M900m 14 w .i -.i 00 0 U m C m ra d0 m .i l•1 $4m ad0ma A m d -i a -n v '1 '•4 a to m..vd .CU A U Ad .i Am A 00 mGCAm b�.°CA 4) 'y 44 to 00 d b+ m 414-0 m .i d m 0 = to d m 0 0 0 0 $41.4 4)$4k -i= .=c .a 1 b+ddd 1+ a A O d +i m -1i v= to m ._ C) 0U4144 kd 1-I Ei$4$4vm �w U O to to R A >�k in 94 0% dm m = m 000tyl .x Cm+i$4 v0 m m 100=C m +i>$4•1i •4-+q am= and 4).140= mA $4 0 ixi 4)-W m 0 tT m 0 w 0 m A O' W O+W E0k aia R 044J9i Wa 10t0 03 Hl•1 -e 41 It 4 N M z A J .i d ri to rry 4.) ti �+ $4 w m k 4.4 O 0=) r. A k of a °ki 14 44 3 0 V r i v m>m0 °i 04 ty, M m .a 4 >>,Ov C w w O O O O C O+ 0 t +i +=i3AA XO?dU k .-1 d to to 1-i m m a dH.-4 4 F.i P4 0 Ki l0 N a AGENDA < i Er:, NO. 3011 PA )� Jl OF11 �J m Sa H al m a1 01 p; 0) 0) m •a .� •OA 0) V $4 $a m 0 a .0 4)4-) w aJ $4 C •4 m a) -,1 •.l 0 . 4 2! a.) H C .a a) -H 0) w d - U 5 v Sa >, .a -H 0) 0) U roa)H -P we >r•i0ro 0)a� ro0)Sa V wa 01>•.+�i .Cm0VU 0) >,+)wraU 14 $a 4m0V U d SaO.CO m a) +3 C 4) a) $a Y •.i w 12,0 .0 N 0) m 0 V C a) a) $4 .+ W 3 w A m 0) a C -H C U o .4 ••i .a v .0 m a) a .0 -•a w a -H .,4 4)4))cca'� 004)VIc01 m.CCA -4iV4)4)=r >+(aC� X 14 041 H UA dyv qO�' Ur �c Lei Q +U+'i- •V.) w 01.41 44) m000.i `4 d 91 41 [3O WNC0eq $441044.-10)3m v104)UCmOCro k.Cro4a.ia)3m Oro Y ro:9uc(a v - •.,CU4)-H0Uro ro3UCtovU.Ca� t w .0 d 4) +) m 10$+ a ro 0\ C t W A 4) 4) V to C 0 v 0 m m•o U C 14 o m1)ro m m 0 01 m m•0 U C 01 01w z 4)Cr,d C0) 01�wC14s+.i� dC.10) C0) VS 4rm; O w f4 U .+H 94 .a m ro 14 S4 10m w la WL) U .+i4 $49 O 0 tl 0) 0) -H 0) a ro m m .a ro 4 a) 0) $4 •.) 0) 4) -H 0) a ro 0) m t4 w 0) MO 4)PP0w.PHa 0)H•p ro Vi)0m 04 -)V4)4 -4V 0a >t+aC2! za .0 (1) (0444 104) r. fa 4Owroroa�ro 44)(0444-404) •HtoR00 0 E'0MPO m00 E4 XUma•,OAAmA H000E+OmU0 pot -,4 E4 a7 E 0 a�EOtpE?' aE a W W EWaH �E \H \ 0. MOO zzSW zz�Wzz7Wa zp"Iz u0wc vIWa a()0Wc ac°� M O M O H 0 M w w w w w Sa 0) O C O a) p: O w .0 V O 01 ••) d V w •.a .-, 0 .0 Sa C N 10m C O> to 41 w ON 9 ro w 0) v -.i Z w C -P r C 0 rd�ro :°o -P4Jx°C 0) aro C to U U 4 r. 'M r-4 44 01 -H O ••i 0 0) to •14 .a 0 O 0) 4J 4)•H A O Ora 4) A m 0) v U 41 w O 94 0) Sa m 41 • Ef 10i 8 QI mzto v OA -C d wmm 0v Am Fa 0)N O O Aw )v m .0 roto A rl 4)�-H -Pk a•i0 IH6M m N.i � .a Or .a ro d 04J mr40V to41 to C x>a r.wro 4) VA ILOardw 4)-P .aid $4 -Hi atr-Hato moa°i 14 oe+ o � r+01.a to C >,V 9 ro c -H \ ro C 0.4 b+ m Y .0 to to b a) .4 aJ ra .a ro -H y f4 $4 ma)RA4441XW44)) d0U30 0) • H .-1 f., 0) m O a 0) Y v .+ •n 0 0A 0 0 m ?!A0 V-A '0 me $4 0 >. C O UVC O CYOb.a 14m4) D to m 0 b $a •.) C C .a $a Sa w N ,qq7 Sad a) C m .a ro am -a oc 4167 CE301 Na a)4)�OC-H mC171 w z o 0 N Opo m HVb ro w 0)-.a >, z .a $a a ,V ro Gu -.+.a C O 0. I .� .a 0 O Q N y 0) w -H 7 .0 .•a Y .a V $a 0 V ro -H a a O a E+ro0 4m 04>4m.a3m 4.0 L) tl H E 3;7L ,� .OF 7! Ml W 0 r m to O A 4J N W avW O $4yr >>, 4) in O+ a C W 0 O W 0) .4 $4 -.$4i •.>i W CUd W w W 'O i0 >4 44 W0) 4Jc(Dmm41 H 3 > d 3i WWW RO,C °roiJam 13 .04 x >.-P ro mm r. 3 b W -.i rt 04 iW7 d 0�l rai > D mH'0 0 tai W C O :1 -H 0C4A34W odc"a� b O- ° 4.4 •U Ci0 O00Cr4)U +i 0H�-Oi>W w 0 > to 0 4a w 110 4) ° .roC $4 C d > ••i a m° a to a to W $4 W r W U�3 -H3°i3W 0 4J W m N A mro> MWiw°d 4) -H iv 000 az»4 U a a N z 0 w 1-4 44.0 W W 0 N 1 04 " N W w O O M a w W z H z w E H U to O O Y W l+ -0 -P 4-) A W W vv r 04J 0 3 r4 .� w a O >0WC •,°CW 'WO�4J UY m C W •-� W W A44ic�am•"•+m >004Wmr 0 O U- �A 10 °CrU�oW tAN m C m w mij c•°4oaaa4)) r)Itl wro'OO 44 «°-1 0 >4 V a 04 ww uro 0-1410 m W W M 0) -M kJ.1m 0 0 U A V W C m -+ W +J O 4J W Ur+ro 7 0, 0 O+wC ++roabv °x'o WO -i9m3W WS+m>ro+> a A1411WA4)4)10 °4 wcC 4 000> 041 8 > r�1 ° 0 •Ri v to 3 0A O e W iw 0r•i r; 0 $4 m.14.4 m 3H U 0 4 a-) W ri ro O > A 0$4 r) W m ., 4 a a +) •-1 W+i aC Or W A a ••i -H w 0 rtx 04 4j N 3 w a 0 0 3 z a iJ 44 U Uv ° to ) U 0 r C W $4 r) rl C +i 0}1» a 4 C r1 y r1 0 m .4 0+ 0R -i ro N 11-•-1 ••C•1 d a 0 •mo 0i U a444 a 0 A a w W z H z W » H H U W OASril 14 0) O r Ew44)Y V A U U 3 to ro 3 vc••iw oVv 04J W Wwv W r0N>WOr1'O m Ci m r♦ La +i •.i -.ia..ia�C7m W W to 0A C 00)1 W JJ E G U W U }aa a0-+iWWW2T ill U 44 ru 4) A 0 .0 4 4) 0% m 310 0 ii >,+i C W -.i O r4 4 W a3-•40.047 (D > 3 'O V O > �i d 4) 0 w >+ m 'WO > 4) w 4J 44 0V W 4) $4 ° 0 $4 C °O.d d N a �CtLU'OU0°)frA4)) 0�A3>-r) VV °yvaJ 0,W 0.4 00) +i rl C A. C rl 04 4)4-)4W ° Th 00) «Cm i W +i W 0, w m>vs 0 w4))>+LA+mir47C C V 0 3 -� 4)> 'a .H U •� O.roO W 3•�i U r+ .i a0M.900010 W •H Si iJ rl A m a N �' =,12.0�o' vi v a W H E H H c� za za zaEl u zau wEO+ zw Isw lz Sa O H0 UpG Uq0 Ups � U C R Gr wi • U k 4J A6 4J G C w ri to Gr ro •rI •,i to O to w A to 3 G) GI m 3 •-I w A 7 C to CO � O+ A m to 4) 0 0 .0 r. .-i 4f � C' d ri $4 Q . A o A Cm• -Iv 4) to 'iC C 4JC -•ai06roYH • 0V 0.F•I C CImo m0 -.mi Cla00 O a) m 4+ a C o .0 4) it 41 0 ON .i rl to 0) 104-J.0 4) +i C O ••i 044.4 A ro••iww w C C 0 C wri.i a C+iV $4 44 0 Y 7 G) w -•i 0 0 -i m P, --I ro ri 0 y = -H G) 0 aRR '•I .0 a 4.).= m H 660 w 04 a C '•I m A m G) i) 41 m +44)9 14 V M 4) ma> 03 0 C A A to 6 O C to C to 0`4 acro .i a A C ••i Gr O G) G) to A 4-) o -.i 0 0 -H d y> A A .i .i 3v 03a rI 11R>m aUi) 03a G)•H•.I aye M4)WU UG)ro • 4403 ro w 44r44)a G) UO G)C CRa44mm OrIG)O+ 0144)C 04)m O Ularo rIUO O OR GI AV H 'i00 Cm z CGI w 'i 'i C •H 0 0 0 H rI O V 'i to C •rl ri 10 0-H N 0k4100 M41 Amis C' to IM 41 IH M to roCUA a) a ,H >AMito ma .i >a -Ha >m.ito >ro Vw O r1 V N o m '•I 06 A >,.i O H C O H i) O ri M O ri 7 C7 a+i ro w 04-H VRH U 04 k m m w a 04...1 w C.iA m tEi aCCaO,aV 0MV40 aroa«i aro 644 aroto4Jro za oO••iarooH VVC0Vd awOA a'io«i a1IA -If ar a Ua444a0a 4mmoo+) 4tr60V 040401% 40.m3a 0) ed to a+i7Admlaw v 03010 AG) a W H E H H c� za za zaEl u zau wEO+ zw Isw lz Sa O H0 UpG Uq0 Ups � U AGE_t"Pi; i F t..7. /: � F r.•.n� : !�_, OF.�1— C R A wi > d .Ci b A6 3 la r -I 0 9 Sro+ a1 U w A 7 C to CO O+ A m C w m to A b+•ri R •i A o A Cm• -Iv 4) to 'iC C 4JC 'iw wro V) to A r4a RiT O a) -.I O ri to> w a) M 44 •.i a C •.i 044.4 ++ ri U\Nla•'I r! O 3 W m 7 C >4 to w C U ri m ri a) aRR 00.94w03R••i rod m- AR +44)9 >mO UOC11 AU 03a) acro N row mC dw r-4 (W .i .i 0 0 G) >, 4J >, 0 to 44 0 rI O aye CmO$ %to i° CM44W a -m em to7R Rtorori}JG)rom .i 0) lam m�E O •i C 4 «i m a a) m a w r+ A 3 to mAmo d m ww ma) w $4 ON +44i Imo Vm V ;mco.ro0 Uro c)) 3 rola Uro togH Hi q 4) 4) V9IpU +iC C LiXN O� mo-? R $4 Iwo G) +i A R rr+Mr.w o r4 H G) V m G) w ICO R C 'pq •H +) CRE C w 0344 0)V 7 aa) C44•.i O C 0) ed to a+i7Admlaw v 03010 AG) -•i w i.I 44 8 i) R 'i C o GI to1+ a m • m m +) A -M 44 A G) m >10 rI C 4)C Am0aI>,«i 4)w dV too RwC>1 V0UCPU w0m U $1-H m H O GI 4-) la -.i 7 to A ro W O U C w ••i ri 4)v13 -m 44Cw@444)V4) 00 .i «-I w>ro AG)aU 0••i.4iim44 w v mmC mC--t k0 0 wto a AO OG)w R .•i0 C0AYwoo Om RYN R 0 "q .0 0A oAY G)AAW b+ -H G) 0 a Irk 7w> -H y laV C tm $4 1400 +iCro old V R RC+i o :10)C +Ia A UR dw a 044.4 rodt ori.-) 41 aro RR m o r1 0 0v 0> w04Mr4 U a) CR ..444 a o tob+ +i 0Rm wor m- 03 C 0>4mto 3 to 219 .CdPA WI d ID O o to >, O ••1 0 o U G) 0 +i V Ln O $34 C iZ w ro rI w U 0 C 04.) ON ON m rI ri O H ri C ro -m O w 3--),I to>.UCC10to0 0I (a 0301-1 wOm G) m.i wa0 l++A0 mow amd amw >oro C'14 000U -H +iv V 4004))W 0 V C 4) 4) 14 44 0 CA w U a 0 0 o w aro E A44 ro r, 03 0 AA O 044-Hm 40dU0,04p,mU w HtoC 4140 EV U m w 1-1 V' A'i 1-i N r4 AGE_t"Pi; i F t..7. /: � F r.•.n� : !�_, OF.�1— .0 r-1 •4 4 -r1 . 41 41 +1 ro +4 3 3 3$4 U 0 m ,40N r-IroW+y4Cum to 0 to•G C Gro to b m Orli 15 44 IV V f 0 u or. 4 r V 94$4A0 y frr041 000 0 0 ••q O O O ro W r1 0 •'t WUY Pei M4J44 04-1 $4Y- X0 tl 0 "CO >y•� x 0G >, . .1 0 0 0 0 v °>7fA, aEMO 1°WroroHa-40 wa- tlO m OmoCyYmN •4m•+1 to 41 "1 o R +i a -UAUs4 U� tC••MN4J E H E w a z AZI H z t C0POi`E a oo W0.W5 o90 Wa O UQG UQG W m W ' a ro Q) it ro .00A0 �"{' � c (d S d v U 0 11 41 +'y 4-) i0 dro to 4) U s -4 > 0 •�.17ma UUd M 0 to G r4 •.4 N 0 r1 44 41 41 b W to +i TW V tO 44) 41 O 1.4 13 '1 0 0 k 0) 0 '1 4) 4) '4 41 v tod -14 4-) ro 7 4J 4) to U > r1 EI U roV4 4) -i884 .ied 0�-OiCO. b0%m +1 41 0 to G +1 >0 $4 x*4 bg m r. V O•,t 10 r4 0 Ur tp V O 41 I -o 1 ro0% 41 4>1 m .0 W ••i 0 M .0 ed V 0 }1 U tl 3a >. .0 � V 10 PC M id -H 0/ 4 d 9 i C) a 0� �Ua1 Pl 0+Oi-PINU poc O4 1W1UWogo40-'1 }1N 0 a 0Vm >,m to D 4 U 411 «mt H H )C tl a E p REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVEIAPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28 1990 SUBJECT: Annexation No. 55 and Zone Change 90-7: Coastal Valley Development: a request to annex unincorporated County of Riverside Land into to the City of Lake Elsinore and Pre Zone the 10.68 acres to allow for �,, //%% commeerrc�ial uses. PREPARED BY '/ 1G4�!�'(,�PPROVED BY: Sandra Massa-Lavitt Consulting Planner APPROVED BY: �Rt r/f 1,¢r! Mol , yk City Manager BACKGROUND Dave Gunderman Dave Gunderman Comm. Dev. Dir. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 1, 1990, recommending approval of these proposals by a 4-0 vote (staff report and minutes attached). DlscosslOx The Planning Commission held no discussion concerning these issues. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council adopt Negative Declaration approve Annexation No. 55 and adopt Resolution No. _1sLb2 and approve Zone Change 90-7 and adopt Ordinance No. C the Findings. based on FINDINGS 1. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The proposed project is within the City's sphere of Influence and abuts the City limits. Therefore, the request is a logical extension to the City limits. 3. The project as conditioned will provide the necessary public services to allow development. AGENDA ITEM NO._/ I PAGE —I—OF `� ORDINANCE NO. q03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 10.68 ACRES FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R -R) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) LOCATED BETWEEN DEXTER ON THE NORTHEAST AND INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY ON THE SOUTHWEST AND THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARIES ON THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST. (ZONE CHANGE 90-7: COASTAL VALLEY DEVELOPMENT) . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION This Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: A portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, and Lots 3 & 4, Block 4 of the North Elsinore Tract as shown by map on file in Book 5, Page 105 of Maps, Riverside County Records, together with a portion of Dexter Avenue (existing) and a portion of Dexter Avenue (relocated), and a portion of Third Street as shown on the Department of Transportation right-of-way Map No. 916532, filed as No. 204-838, Riverside County Records, California. from R -R (Rural Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial) on approximately 10.68 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such C-2 Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The proposed project is within the City's Sphere of Influence and abuts the City limits. Therefore, the request is a logical extension to the City limits. 3. The project as conditioned will provide the necessary public service to allow development. AGENDA ITEM- �INO. 1J FA.E ` OF :1L Page 2 Ordinance No. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective as provided by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 28th of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 11th day of September, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGE DA ITEM! NO. 35 NOTE. TIJIS DRAW/NG DOES /(gZ:.REPRESENT A LAND SUR✓EY. SHEET lLI op SHEE 1TS ONLY /LATENT / DEP/CT THE ATTACHED LE, AV'sc /PTrON. ��pBE' S3�B'✓y�`�'F3r � 167.48' �•.f;. iY ' o 4i��pB •31, E NB °0/'t8 "W It& 97' y I "� \ d=3BIff166" s P.0.8. ;A 01 s N'LY. ex. LDTZ T% /0ill' la • o� o E 2soo' L'210.�7 T-- 45,45 _ ��O• "� 9 LALTRUNS R/A A5 SHOW sW IN MAP PN FILE A5 M. 2H -a36 N 1IYERSIDE CONN Rft _ d= 9°1439" `T T- 80.89' N Z70Z4'0/"W 112.031 d -5,,35'20" R, IDOY L : 9755 T' 48.81 LAND E!8 1 1 No. 36;8 `t rn 1Pc. i.t 1 ��Y-O�•�./� 11�C SG9lE rNto IY . CA'aWE b - b - Yo L5 3498 N. 4°i0.91 RF I ELD EW I NEER i NO t SURVEY I;Z A DIVINla OF TM KITH WFAMILO r1j"i C CIVIL DiIlE INS WnFOflWAL E ICC &WNITEI:TIIE LAIOR•MK AIOATCMK LAND ■WKrI i OWLT XTMM. 97IT[ F. LAK OJIN=. OA. Is= 17M 01-1461 y'•6ir' 'N'N'IY dA' Ar LAKE ELS/NUF 60UNDARY PER ANNEXATION NO. M MT NO.1 J526 AT. 7-25-85 AMOT/DN NO. fflY OF LAKE ELS/NAeF MR. L075 142 1 8M.5 , L075 3 64 , Of 7//f MR71/ WINDRF TRACT, Md. S,"/05 w.o. 80294 RESOLUTION NO. Q 0 J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 55 - COASTAL VALLEY DEVELOPMENT" WHEREAS, on August 28, 1990, the proponent of the Annexation, known as "Annexation No. 55 - Coastal Valley Development" has requested that the City Council consent to the commencement of proceedings to annex said area, which is contiguous to the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, the said annexation area is entirely within the City Sphere of Influence; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, at a regular meeting held on August 1, 1990, made its report upon the desirability and made its recommendation in favor of said annexation; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to give its consent to the commencement of annexation proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA: 1. That consent be and hereby is granted for the commencement of annexation proceedings in accord with California Government Code Section 56000 et seq. for the uninhabited territory designated hereby as "Annexation No. 55 - Coastal Valley Development" which consists of 10.68 acres located between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and Interstate 15 freeway on the southwest and the existing City boundaries on the northwest and southeast, which is shown on the map designated as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. trENCA ITEM NO-_—. P = OF Page 2 Resolution No. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 1990, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore PACE—L— OF NOTE T.06 DRAWING DOES N. �REPWENT A LAVO SURVEY. SHEET l OF S/>`EE. IT'S ONLY /MTE/JT /A DEPICT THE .4TTACHED LE4k( lsct'/PT/ON. /r4, lk%J, c� N43�45'S9'E S.3�B' Jr 167.48' P.O.B N'LY. COR. LOTZ L= ODD P-210. 'ri T, 105,45 Zc�c CALTRAA'S R/W A5 PINAL--- dN HAP Z F1LE AS N0.10A-838 I'IYERSIDE COUNY REC. 41459" 9: /000' L: 161.44' 4 P- 80.89' N Z7°Z4'O/"W 112.03' 4:5'35'20" R, 1466, L = 97.65 T 4,a6l NBO01'18"W /ObG. 97' d =38'11'50" le= 300' L, Z60.00' T° 103.81' ,LI �D LAND r No. 3698 `L rr.Y.P(, -Jo-92 MA rxto ff. CKOiit o— b-yv -- - --+ LS 3698 QC 6.30.42 17TE:UFIELD ENGINEERING l 6U MING A MINCH CI TIE KEITH WFAKID WCIVIL DWINE RSHO EINUOf DffAL 8MIen ITELTUE LAiO0E1AK ARCHILAID tAMYIIB OOE OWEY f11fET. NATE F. LME ELSIIOE. CA. INXXI 17141 57+-1441 SC9lE �—NlfTY WY A° LAKE ELS/NORF, BOUNDARY PER ANNEXRW NO. 3B IXT.N0.1 3526 REi'.7--25-85 ANNEXATION NO. CITY OF LUF ELSIN CE POR. LOTS /42 , BLK. 5 , LOTS 3 64 , OF 7//E AWN ELS•I w 7RACT , ILL. 5",,m5 AGENDA ITEM NO. n W.O. 80244 OF APPROVAL FOR ANNEXATION 55 I. If the proposed General Plan is not adopted prior to approval of the Annexation by LA -FCO, or the proposed land use designation is changed to a land use not consistent with the C-2 zoning a General Plan Amendment shall be required prior to any further development requests. A'ENZA1iE[JSNO.� ����0�-90/�--�I � P.R3=-L OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 7 al Project 89-12, : "fee to be det, Motio of by Commissioner Saath adoptio Negative Decl; Tentative Parcel Map 25717 ai on the Fin 'ngs and subject 1 for Tentativ Parcel Map 257 89-12) liste in the Sta amendments: Condition No. 6: \Dele i r, suggested the following v biage ed at the ti/toty ' ation." ff to recommy Council -ation 89-57roval of i Industrial -12 based the Conditiroval (35 7 and 27 forl Project f Report wfollowing Condition No. 5: Del`te Condition No. 21: ' Fi al Landscape plan shall be submitt to the Planning Department forappr al and include landscape and irriga on specifications to be approved b\beepared y's Landscape Architect, determined at time of apThe revised plans shouland signed by �a licenape Architect andincludeing:" Second y Commissioner Wilsey. Appr ed 4-0 At thi time, 8:00 p.m., the Planning Commission recesse . At t s time, 8:12 p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened. 7. Annexation 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development LP - Community !Development Director Gunderman presented a request to annex 10.68 acres of unincorporated County of Riverside land into the City of Lake Elsinore and to pre -zone the property C-2 (General Commercial). The subject property is located between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and I-15 freeway on the southwest and the existing City boundaries on the northwest and southeast. Chairman Brown opened the publlic hearing at 8:13 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at!8:14 p.m. There being no discussion at 'the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-22 and approval of Annexation 55 and Zone Change 90-7 based on the Findings and 1 Condition of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 8. Zone Change 90-10 - George Alongi - Assistant Planner DeGange presented a request for a Zone Change on three parcels from R- 2, Residential, to R-3, Residential, to establish consistency AGENDA ITEM/�h0. A� PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared By Approved Deborah Bradford Planning Consultant OWNER/APPLICANT Coastal Valley Development LP Jason Levinson 2534 Thunder Mountain Road Upland, CA 91786 REQUESTED USE Public Hearing Annexation 55 Zone Change 90-7 August 1, 1990 BY�6W_eY%,_ Dave Gu rman Comm. Dir. A request to annex unincorporated County of Riverside land into the City of Lake Elsinore and to pre -zone the property to allow for commercial uses. SIZE AND LOCATION The subject property is comprised of approximately 10.68 acres of land and is located between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and I-15 freeway on the southwest and the existing City boundaries on the northwest and southeast. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Predominantly vacant RR 1 - Very Low except for mobile homes County Density Res - on three parcels. idential Surrounding (ldu/lac) North - Scattered residential RR 1 - Very Low predominantly mobile County Density Res - homes. idential Surrounding (ldu/lac) East - Scattered single-family M-1 10 - Limited and light industrial Industrial uses. Surrounding South - I-15 freeway industrial M-1 10 - Limited development. Industrial Surrounding West - Park and ride lot and commercial development. BACKGROUND The proposed annexation is city initiated and would result in the removal of Riverside land. a small island of unincorporated County of City requested to annexations are in an attempt ensure that orderly development occurs within the City of Lake Elsinore. AGENDA ITEM NO. - 'Z_/ 10 RAGE OF r DISCUSSION The request is to annex 10.68 acres land into the City of Lake Elsinore highway oriented commercial uses. concurrently being processed as part requirements to annexation. 59 Public Hearing Annexation 55 Zone Change 90-7 August 1, 1990 Page 2 of unincorporated County to allow for future A pre -zone request is of the pre -designation The pre -zone and request to annex is the first requirement of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) when annexing into a local jurisdiction. Once approved by the City, the annexation request is reviewed and processed with LAFCO. ANALYSIS The proposed annexation would be a logical extension of the City limits given that the existing City boundaries abut the project site to the northwest and southeast. The existing County zoning for the project site is the RR (Rural Residential) zone. This zoning allows for low density residential uses and commercial and manufacturing uses subject to a conditional Use Permit. The proposed pre -zoning of the site would be to the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district which would allow for the development of freeway oriented commercial uses. Presently, the General Plan land use designation is very -low residential density which would not be consistent with the proposed C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. However, prior to annexation being completed the proposed general plan will be adopted and has designated this area as a commercial manufacturing land use which is consistent with the proposed pre -zoning. Additionally, as a part of the annexation submittal requirements a plan for the provision of Municipal Services was provided (See attachment A). This plan indicates that services would be extended immediately by the City. The services provided by the City would be funded through property tax, user fees, sales tax, State subventions, and other miscellaneous revenues. ENVIRONMENTAL An environmental assessment form was completed for this project and it determined that a Negative Declaration is recommended. Additional environmental review will be required during the development phase of the project site. At this time another initial study will have to be prepared and supplemental text documents such as biology, geology, traffic and cultural reports may be required. The outcome of this initial study will determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report will have to be prepared prior to actual development of the site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-22 and approval of Annexation 55 and Pre -zone 90-7 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. AGENDA ITEM NO./�/ Or ! '/ r c Public Hearing Annexation 55 Zone Change 90-7 August 1, 1990 Page 3 2. The proposed project is within the City's Sphere of Influence and abuts the City Limits. Therefore, the request is a logical extension to the City limits. 3. The project as conditioned will provide the necessary public services to allow development. AGENDA ITEMN/OO, -b PACE -11 OF OFFICE USE ONLY Negative Declaration No. 90-22 Project: Annexation 55 & Zone Change 1. CITY PE LAKE ELSINORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Developer or Project Christensen Contact Person: Address: post office Box 1687 2. Environmental Address: 1 City: LakE r : agnri Information Prepared by: DPmrnh Bradfnrd pity of Lake ElsinorE 3. Proposed Project : cm m Title: Annexation 55 Location: p....,+,}wtween Dexter Avenue on the northeast and I-15 freeway on the southwest, and the PxistJ= r� hrnmrlary On the northweqt and southeast Total site acreage: Gross: in_r,A Net: For Residential Project: Number of units: Dwelling units per acre: Unit sizes (square feet): Attach brief description of proposed project, including intended use, and phasing of project, or if present project is a phase or portion of a larger project. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by local, regional, state, and federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 5. Environmental setting: Attach a description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and surrounding pro- perties, including information on topography, geo- logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE I l O GENERAL EXISTING LAND USE ZONING PLAN Project site Dredominantly vacant RR 1-qtq . except for mobile homes County 16W w 5, Dn three parcels (id,4, Zati Surrounding scattered residential RR 1 - very North redominantly mobile County low density ernes (ldu/2ac) Surrounding scattered single family M-1 10 -Limited East 5nd light industrial usess Industrial Surrounding -15 freeway industrial 14-1 10 -Limited South 1evelopmeant Industrial surrounding k and ride lot and C-2 7 -General West cial development Commercial AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE I l O X► XI XI XI X( XI XI ("I X1 X I ( ( ►( I I i t 1 1 I t t ►► I I t t I I I I I I ( « Na 01 woefP i i ocr to ^•/§o ge �� •✓ & Gp O G e Y Y p r Y. Y' « A Y N• G E N O• VSSS S pp yY LL 7. • .. U i C 3 i G O Y w O C L E O w • Y C w II M P• M p Y G C wMC q Y M • R• N■N O Y0.4 • \• • N M ■4• iIL qQ4 COG. O•i• •M1 .i •YMJeP %•mow s�' •_ \ w• .y0 .~iN Y H; M: Y 00 OOYO f Y r�1 • CCP V tt • 6 «�II~ Cp as S• o q .r5 SOC N Y O Y.• �y tt Ir N •G.y•6 «Yi GMMC CN ., L ••NN «No �• yN Y ~0 Owp 00 ZgqVJ ,�� .•ICG �•1 Y C w Y O/ V N N• ~ Y s y 0 0 A« C C• i M C C • i •> C b A O i Y•go ~••• � Y�• ac9: yC M C so+•i•NE Y U C C~ �.00 MO i C C • �S 4 �� P Y 6G • ••q p ww GUUi e/ ;'e Y n/•� •0 Ow riN ll: O.O C 6\ ! /a/CS ✓ ■PN ✓ • yyCp ��11 r H. /N A✓i tlY./•I C; PCI✓: 60P HOw Y! RC �: V��ti Mwti RO.0 MOMiC EM �: ,�C N• r)i p0 e: •• Cy • II V O !M • d Y w160 �M • Y I•I � II V p ,. e V n 9 XI XI X( Xt X( XI XI XI xl >� XI X i X1 ( I I I ► I I I I t i I I Iq LY N •. G CO� • A, Z. YYa iM1 y ■ 1 YC O CC.pIo- NNY R C wY • �Y Y •MYM1 Y Ow■ ✓' OO Oi Y✓Y�Yi �P Y�w✓a.0 w4.0 G OYB V • iY L i• Y OYYw O .OM MY• YO CC M•Y {P pw CLpLCY ✓Mw Y..w ■ > Cw N Nw T \Y\a O YOL ✓O Yi O• •Yj T30. •O •Yp O/• UGII NYw C • Y O ' •■ .w 1. p Y R O Y• M1 N GVM1 ■YM1 C OJCP •R {YOIYCY Lv:y �� �� C.CIaUY>T OY LYZ•Gi Yeo �YL> S O YYYiO aiw Q}0) • k wYY Y •0y ✓w wD PO ✓ Cp > C6■O CM ■ "pMV0 Yw Cw ✓N•NM • ,ti 4b N C MO Gi YO«>XVA ✓. ~ILLY• COIIr MY•• N • yw4 Y ✓Lti m0 YC N OYC YC N pp YU ••O✓N M •Yb •p PY VY •YON O p'O pp LOO 00 ✓Y•T N • C• •CCy ✓ • C 4mD .. •YO YO •OL•� r YQ.O CY OCL■Y 4 pp.w 1. UYC.~.IN•Y CMi C003iU C�wO O�OY !O U• IOU• = GGCM•w ccNY. YM C •J c V Do i 10m06 f < 214M Y t1YC0 tlp Yi <OCa OiY PCMO IN•Oi YPV O.L"Q maCC I.C16LO W e •s r C • V p • M P _• <w • II V i n N C , oO :Gy s 0 :w1 iYO.0 MY>.YNY> • 0 C C • R Y C y L C a • 4✓ • w> q « Dw yMov > ✓OYYDGag t•c C• L T. •NNG YOG iy Di.✓.9�N Rim Y Op m Y YYM p>, LC• O • Y 0D P 9 Y•• • C •) y ..I G C N O t. as IL • ■O YO90 DEI' q.•ip •N•\• 41CU LY .✓'• • - YCYiCON o ERueCYwdM Chia • •. P p. 0. Y L PY✓ Y •✓ Z�tiO iy yLwwN \•A Y• •pN Y OiwopMq uY q \ Y ✓CO ;•Y 07 w•M4Y ✓.- • p•• Y 0 Y1 NC EE N• tocc kots ✓•4NY ON Mn•. Y. ptl. Y0CL>.0 . •YnII Y 4 G O fY ami: O~3II < U YNN•.R •0•p Y )R TCOY Ti•M S GY:Nyfe+,W, ]MSO • O Y C n Y C L Y N Y w N✓ Goo O U Y L >L LL • CN •:iN ✓ pew Y• .0 •moi• q .L. • ^ Y q w Y✓> F ] Y I. • Y Y q O Y O u q C Y Y Y✓ .^ Y Z p• Y L• g i Y •.✓� n Y m O Y•+ Y>OC M Y UY U•. LY Uou = OYLN6 YXR� P as rano G✓-✓ '0 •L.. c� c n irR. u u Y> LY+L Y W F Q Y -.: Y i 6 u a u ILII < R Y Y3Y; mGi.+ < M1 XI XI Xt X ( XI XI XI I I I I l I I t. M ^, 'a > > . • 7 0 •P Y 0o•YVO YCCC yy qq L M !o ; g>.>A O^\ 0•pwMON YM'~YL i w •CL N• OGCLOpC Old.PY wpY O i.N C• R a OL .1/0) •N • }. .y wM 6N YwM N•Y o•✓ c qII NYY •.•i YY00 iMw •L•OCZ' O.Np•YN N q o9wppp.. w00 O.e.✓i2 Y a✓0 t O Ce..•i Y .\• CCN �Y YUO Cm0 CwG•YO• DPOO• e M1 • O C N O N Y LOY\ •■ •C•.0 Y✓• N • Q,y .Oiw � w\ \ Y«P• YY O •. '^ Y YY ROL •pp��CO OOYp 7 �YY C•w PO.�•Y GP OT• O 'j pRy 0 o✓ I CY OL COC.... • • Y O✓Lp• CCY OOw LCw U0 Loi 4WOC\� pN. FO)i w <Ce1Y .Ygl0n LUG OO'w u O M ylw • II • P AGENDA ITEM33 PAGE' O.OF �' i X1 %I 1 t I I I I .I pY C I .✓i � 4 ✓ Y T � 8O6 oX000 • s 0 aa ONrO p •.••� • Y fro✓• Y TO Y O u Y Y•✓ O L L• i C Y -w�p • ■8u0�� p■Op TiYY •p UO•Y QS pa• .ri��i 4 Y fYY\ YA• U \ Y�O+i �� M OVw 1 y• 0 AY�O A• w A •w0 a. COY O w n •U4 nPGn •.� rNo L•Ow1 Lf YYF 4w00> LiP. Ow YY y 1. LIDO CLMQU GY Y•+ Y•G rOnP• w wY YO w•Ytn• 60 O• nON6 0••■w• • w •■n w •■wn Ynu4 w..UY •D M wCLtiO tiGOYDL OOa MXipp Yy Oy Y jwYi• S-14 AtO AYY i••G 102X, pp a 1 604 Y • Y O � O xl Axl xl x I xl x I xIxl Axl XIxI xl xl x) C) Dow n w>.j�Gp�G✓E�CuO ✓O C✓ L0tY ¢�Y puOj~C dtC ODA O✓TY w~OOC YGXYTYYY�AY Ytl4 nAA9L �•0ti00 M1VP FAO ✓■ �C" 1�YN ✓YU)>t Y6 0.4)YwLO AZ•COL XLtiw uaYv 6 N wwot 26 Y O i•• 0✓p�G Ea �LODwLO j0•>C o O OU 0 n ✓ D4 eOuG� .niY�u G ✓ \ O Y .GI Oawn OL iOO •✓+iY ✓ O Y•• n Y•�UOYY �Y OL ✓ Y Y GY >M1 n 00 +�AOY0 iC6Y Y V Yi O • L✓ �DL✓ •• C>w0Y••1 >LP O A r• Mu ew tl n ■ Y7 • L w0 a9L0 O8Y ■ YL4C •w C L ■ On �wry ■'U =„ u• OVY4) ••0✓ O ~ O ) > Yn C 4w •Y Y �n.YiY•� • O YL :-a O. >>...L. OM OOYwjG 6� •Y Y L 0 )•� N iC 00.✓iR 8 Yp wwGAn6> wO�.Y••we y O m P✓ iML O P� .0:0 0aO�0 w.✓iYC•• 0. � i 0 0 N C•e VLC•Gi /Flpt6 t�■r 6CYl w A Y a i 4 7 w O Y O■ ■ O e T O O u Ytl w00w6 p0 •Y GO4.w u.1 _204402 CY • ✓•TY••1 y C6 0 L <Y•✓A✓O> p D O• w • L Y C • r V Y 0 L p Y■• Y • i Y O • M1 f •rvy ••� f w •� r I XI XI % I k l kl x I XI X I XI %I X I � • ✓ w 1 w H C po- 4 O YE \9 i•w•pp COON wY 0 CC w0 M� CpF L �O� Y OU OY YO �CPEYuC AYYO 000 O~ C■ EY i~ we 1 G SS w w✓ • Y O ✓ O✓ n 4 L Y • •A n YO j✓ • OO ONC••10✓O A■LC AOO ✓n YO e�9 n Oe ✓G Y 10 GO CGO •O n �p YO Yti0 YY w>Y >>•T i Y• Y PN 000 CY •90w 4w• w■ YOY Ow M4Y CO pLnD YY>Ytl L .YPM AtlY w■L >O O+.0 OY 4✓p X ✓ a ON Y •ti i .0 E4 AYa >Y L•tlN YY Oe >Y LO GOw✓UYO nDNO 0010 LLw wn MY X0••1 .IC ✓YOM1tl ✓O ✓RC ✓LCL Y✓ �� ••Y > ■ 6Y�0 lL4 w_YyyO ✓ PO c\Yp•O OC> •YY M •uY •n L YO■r Dm •G ✓YY O> �^ OYU�Y�✓ O� w✓i •r10 A1C GwE yPry wtl�0 wMr. Y✓tl yCYO 1Y eT C O Y A•• PN••i YY ow YP FnO! ='•■1C OA �"O• YOB' mow■ OM> 4 O •w O9N nOYO ¢ OL ✓LO D YYY M4Yn tl�•9tl OYCO pX YYry UuC YYY 4YD0 YY Y4U C✓ -. i n s U tl L T m 0 O D✓ Y Y✓ C O U D Y✓ 9 L✓ Y C E5 9 w C 0 7 X T Y O Y C Y O M G 6 ti Oi0••✓4C LOO�^1 U••• Y Y yu bY0 <AOY <DY CG YGCA YO O bY4 O Y.Ai <✓YFU✓Y✓ 7YG✓C OYYY Gn VOR M1 OG =p A✓ 0 Y Du Y O O•+ ✓L D..w aiY ..YO Nti u 9 Y M •i � y OtG • d ■.6000 C•UG F> O a n ACENDA ITEM NO. 33 RAOG15 OFV I. II. I-23-86 C r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY YESS�—AYBE NO MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? X All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative declaration to be issued. DETERMINATION• x The proposed project should not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. Although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, it will not in this case because of the attached mitigation measures. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. REVIEWED BY: DATE: PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE: 6-/4?d AGEN!ZDA ITEM NO 33 r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED Negative Declaration 90-22 Annexation No. 55 Zone Change 90-7 Project Description As proposed, the applicant is requesting annexation of this property into the City of Lake Elsinore and the pre -zoning of the site to C-2 (General Commercial) District. Approval of the annexation and pre -zoning would allow for the development of freeway oriented commercial uses. 5. Environmental Setting The proposed project site is comprised of approximately 10.68 acres of land located between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and Interstate 15 on the southwest. The project site is presently within the County of Riverside and surrounded to the east, west and south by the City of Lake Elsinore. Three mobile homes are currently located on the project site. Land uses surrounding the site consist of scattered single-family development to the north, light industrial uses and scattered single-family development to the east, Interstate 15 and industrial development to the south, and a park and ride lot and commercial development to the west. Vegetation on the project site consists primarily of weeds. However, a strand of eucalyptus trees occur along the southern perimeter of the site and residential landscaping including a variety of trees surround the mobile homes. Local access to the project site may be obtained from Interstate 15, Central Avenue, Dexter Street, Second Street, and Camino Del Norte. Current zoning on the project site is County Rural Residential and the existing land use designation is 1 -Very Low Density. However, the land use designation for this site will change to commercial/manufacturing when the updated General Plan is adopted in September. Environmental Impacts 1. to 7. & 9. to 20. The proposed annexation and pre -zone would not result in any significant impacts to all the categories listed on the initial study form. However, significant impacts may occur during the development phase of the project site. At this time an initial study will have to be prepared and supplemental text documents such as biology, geology, traffic and cultural reports may be required. The outcome of this initial study will determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report will have to be prepared prior to the actual development of this site. 8. Land Use a. Presently, the project site is zoned Rural Residential (Riverside County Zoning). This zoning allows by right, single-family development, light agricultural uses and mobile homes. However, subject to a Conditional Use Permit a variety of land uses would be allowed such as commercial and light industrial uses. The proposed pre -zone is to the C-2 (General Commercial) District which allows for a variety of commercial uses. Therefore, a significant impact on land use would not occur due to the proposed annexation and pre -zone. AGENDA ITEM NO. r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED PAGE 2 Negative Declaration 90-22 Annexation No. 55 Zone Change 90-7 /cm b. Presently, the pre -zoning of the project site to C-2 (General Commercial) would conflict with the current General Plan Land Use designation of very -low residential density. However, prior to annexation being completed the proposed general plan will be adopted which has designated this area as a commercial/manufacturing land use. Therefore, a conflict with the general plan would not exist. If the adoption of this land use does occur a General Plan Amendment would be required. AC,7NDA {TE�4 NO. I Fr.__-� �f OF " NOTE: This DRrtW AIS DOES N�.REPRESENT A LAND SLLQYEY.LSHEET OF I S/�EE iT5 ONLY imrviT / DEP/CT ME ATTACHED LEGA5GRlPT/ON. 'y43• , 4k V 43�45'59'E �6 S9. 3r /67.48' M.8. iY ' o y/bel � I \ P.d.B s� STY. CDR. LOU L'210.77 T-/05.45 z� CA m,f3 R/YY A5 SHJWN ON ,NAPON FILE Ai NO.104-836 ,P/YRROE MINN KK . x ° 1400' L-- /6/.441 T-84.89' N Z7°Z4'0/"W NB °0/'18"W ML. 771 ,6,3801116,4" K= 344' L= 140.04' T° !03.88' d :,5'35'20" Ch1/ 9, 1D04' L, 97•SS T =48.87 ` t No. 3698 `L W.CBOWE 6— 6-90 — - -- �� 1 LS 3G9B fX/. G•30.92 MkTEPUJIELD EWINEERINQ t SURVEYING A DIYIt107 OF 7W WITH WWAPn= CIVIL DNINMIM E,WUOOMAL l71YIQ7 R LAMMCAM A11071TEDi1R LMO FAVTYIIi WD DVJ Y RIEET. aU1TE F. lata CJIWM. G. UMM 0141 O*IMI a 4- 'E %/ 3"'4201 k `N'N'lY C!!Y Ac LIA'E ELS/NORE' A MOAKY PER ANNEXATION NO. 3A W..M.I4 3516 9W.7.25-85 OEMTION NO. CITY OF LAKE RSINdUr PJR. L075 / 2 , ALA.5 , LOTS 3 94 . df 711E MR711 E1S7NORE TRACT, /L B. S //05 AGENDA ITEM M 33 C LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ci A portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, and Lots 3 & 4, Block 4 of the North Elsinore Tract as shown by map on file in Book 5, Page 105 of Maps, Riverside County Records, together with a portion of Dexter Avenue (existing) and a portion of Dexter Avenue (relocated), and a portion of Third Street as shown on the Department of Transportation Right -of -Way Map No. 916532, filed as No. 204-838, Riverside County Records, California. More particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 2; THENCE North 430 44' 08" East along the Northerly line of said Lot 2, being also the Southerly boundary of the City of Lake Elsinore per Annexation No. 28, Recorded May 260 1983, as Instrument No. 140722, Riverside County Records, 40.00 feet to the centerline of Dexter Avenue (existing) as shown on said Department of Transportation map; THENCE South 460 13' 18" East along said centerline, 5.31 feet to the centerline of Crane Street of the Famlee Tract as shown by map on file in Book 14, Page 9 of Map Books, Riverside County Records, being also the Southerly City of Lake Elsinore boundary per said Annexation No. 28; THENCE North 430 45' 59" East along said Southerly boundary, 167.48 feet to the centerline of Dexter Avenue (relocated), as shown on said Department of Transportation map; THENCE South 080 01' 28" East along said centerline, 166.97 feet, to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 300.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly 200.00 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 380 11' 50", to the centerline of said Dexter Avenue (existing); THENCE South 460 13' 18" East along said centerline, 350.17 feet, to the intersection of said Dexter Avenue (existing) and said Third Street; THENCE continuing along said centerline South 460 13' 18" East, 825.00 feet, to the Easterly prolongation of the Southerly line of Parcel Map 9686 filed in Book 48, Page 43 of Parcel Maps, Riverside County Records, being also the Northwesterly line of the City of Lake Elsinore Annexation No. 38, as Instrument No. 163526, recorded July 25, 1985, Riverside County Records; THENCE South 430 42' 07" West along said City boundary, 543.26 feet, to a point on the California Department of Transportation right-of-way as shown on said Department of Transportation Map 1916532 filed as Map 1204-838, said point being the beginning of a nontangent curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet, and a radial line through said point that bears North 570 001,3911 East; THENCE Northwesterly, 97.55 feet along said curve, through,a central angle of 050 35' 20"; THENCE North 270 24' 01" West along said right-of-way, 192.83 feet; to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet; THENCE Northwesterly, 161.44 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 090 14' 59"; THENCE North 360 39' 00" West, 463.62 feet; to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 2500.00 feet; THENCE Northwesterly, 210.77 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 040 49' 50"; THENCE North 310 49' 10" West, 414.94 feet, to a point on the Southerly boundary line of said Annexation No. 28; THENCE North 430 44' 08" east, along said line, 150.52 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 12.84 acres more or less. � LAND 3698 `L Fred S. Crowe, LS 3698 eyc.o6 3,_yR' THE KEITH COMPANIES/BUTTERFIELD DATED: JUNE 7, 1990 `req 01 NDA ITEM NO. — OF CAL\E0� �/'� C Dexter Annexation to Lake Elsinore Plan for the Provision of Municipal Services Prepared by Christensen & Wallace, Inc. June 10, 1990 m JUL 1 1990 1a.,.'Irr! 11 _�n1. Services to this 10 -acre annexation may be extended immediately by the City of Lake Elsinore. Law enforcement services are provided by the City though contract with the Riverside County Sheriff Department. This service is to be provided by the Sheriff substation located at 117 South Langstaff Street, allowing a response time of two minutes. Other services to be provided by the City of Lake Elsinore include: animal control, planning and land use, building inspection, parks and recreation, public street maintenance, and general government services. Services provided by the City of Lake Elsinore are funded through property taxes, user fees, and, with additional development, through sales taxes, State subventions, and other miscellaneous revenues. Fire protection services will continue to be provided by the Riverside County Department of Fire, with the station at Graham & Poe Streets capable of a two -minute response time. This service is funded by property taxes, mitigation fees, and partially through special district augmentation funding. Water and sewer services will be provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, and funded by property taxes, water and sewer hookup fees, and service charges. ATTAM,=,, " AGENDA ITE/Mf �NO. 3 PF:a1---Gr. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Zone Change 90-10: George Alongi: a request_ to rezone from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3 (High Density Residential) three adiacent parcels located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. (Ordinance No. qQH) PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Dave Gunderman John DeGancfe Dave Gunderman Assistant Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. APPROVED BY: C"z Roz MolefiSiyk City Manager DISCUSSION At the meeting of August 1, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Zone Change 90-10 with a 4-0 vote (minutes and staff report attached). The current zoning for this site and surrounding parcels is R-2 Residential. The current General Plan designation for this area is High Density Residential which corresponds to the zoning designation R-3. Subsequently the rezoning of these parcels from R-2 to R-3 would bring this area into conformance with the General Plan. The applicant intends to construct two triplexes and a duplex on these sites. An Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared for this project which identified no significant adverse environmental impacts. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90- 24, eclaration90- 24, approve Zone Change 90-10 and adopt Ordinance No. based on the Findings. FINDINGS 1. This request is consist with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. This request will bring the zoning for the site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. This request will not result in any significant adverse impact on the environment. ORDINANCE NO. qCM AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING .62 ACRES FROM R-2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF POTTERY AND LANGSTAFF STREETS (ZONE CHANGE 90-10: GEORGE ALONGI). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION This Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 374-071-001, 002, and 003 from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3 (High Density Residential) on approximately .62 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such R-3 Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. This request is consist with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. This request will bring the zoning for the site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. This request will not result in any significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective as provided by law. pn Fr 7i OFjl, Page 2 Ordinance No. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 28th of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 11th day of September, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore IL Ll AGENDA iTEV N0 - PAGE 3 DF C Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 7 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25717 & INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-12 CONTINUED ndustrial�Pr a to be deect 89-12 termined suggested time of applicatio ." b added. fe Mo 'on by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Co cil ado ion of Negative Declaration 89-57 and approv of Tent a ive Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-1 based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Appr al (35 for Te ative Parcel Map 25717 and 27 for Industria Project 89-12) isted in the Staff Report with the ollowing amendmen i Tentative rcel Man 25717: Conditi No. 6: Delete Industrial Pro Ct 89-12: Condition N . 5: Delete Condition No. 1: "A iFinal Lands ape plan shall be submitted to t Planning Department for -approval nd include landscape and irrigati n specifications to be approved b the City's Landscape Architect, fee to be determined at time of plication. The revised laps sh uld be prepared and signed b a 1'censed Landscape Architect an in lude the following:" Second by Commissioner Wilsey Approved 4-0 At this time, 8:00 p.m., the P1 nning Commission recessed. At this time, 8:12 p.m., the P anning ommission reconvened. 7. Annexation 55 and Z e Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development LP - Co nity'Develop ent Director Gunderman presented a request o annex 10.68 Cres of unincorporated County of Riverside nd into the City f Lake Elsinore and to pre -zone the proper y C-2 (General Comm rcial). The subject property is locate between Dexter Avenue on the northeast and I-15 freeway on t southwest and the exis ing City boundaries on the northwest and southeast. Chairman Brown pened the public hearing at :13 p.m., asking if anyone wis ed to speak in favor. Receivi g no response, Chairman Bro asked if anyone wished to speak 'n opposition. Receiving n response, Chairman Brown asked if nyone wished to speak o the matter. Receiving no response, C irman Brown closed th public hearing at'8:14 p.m. i There b Ing no discussion at the table, Chairman Br wn called for a otion. Moti n by Commissioner Wilsey to recommend to City ouncil ado tion of Negative Declaration 90-22 and approv 1 of An exation 55 and Zone Change 90-7 based on the Finding and 1 Condition of Approval listed in the Staff Report, secon by ommissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 S. Zone Change 90-10 - George Albngi - Assistant Planner DeGange presented a request for a Zone Change on three parcels from R- 2, Residential, to R-3, Residential, to establish consiency AGENDA ITEM NO. PA-- _J -- OF Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 8 WHE CHANGE 90-10 CONTINUED I with the current General Plan. These parcels are located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Ms. Ann Armstrong, 304 West Pottery Street, stated that they would like to see the property remain R-2. Ms. Armstrong then commented on the surrounding uses and the problems they have incurred. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in opposition or on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey commented on conformity with the General Plan, and Ms. Armstrong's comments and requested staff indicate what alternatives she has with regard to R -2/R-3. Commissioner Saathoff commented on the Zoning and General Plan designation --agrees with R-31in this area. Motion by Commissioner Saathlff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-24 and approval of Zone Change 90-10 based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 4-0 i 9. Parking Determination 90-1 and Industrial Project 90 -Ya, C Tile - Joe Deleo - Associate Planner Restivo pr re st to reduce the parking requirements spec Sec ti n 17.66.030. C, and for the construction of square oot addition to an existing industrial bui the sout ast corner of Chaney and Collier. AssociateP nner Restivo requested the followin amendments to the Condit ns of Approval: Condition No. 4a: All existing and propos elevations must be of the same color, with the addition hat white trim may a used to enhance t side elevati s, subject to the app Val! of the Community Development Direc or or his designee. Condition No. 4b: Loading n shall be striped on-site in accordance ith Section 17.66.050 of the Municipa C de and/or a truck storage area s 1 be elineated on the site plan provi ing the area specified by the afo mentioned S ction, subject to the ap roval of the ommunity Development rector or his des' ee. Condition No. 38:/ Delete Condition No. XO: Delete Chairman B wn opened the public hearing at 8:20 p. ., asking if anyon wished to speak in favor. Receiving no sponse, Chairma Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in oppo 'tion. Recei ng no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone 'shed to an/ eak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman B wn cl ed the public hearing at.8:21 p.m. AGENDA {TEAS NO. PAGc OF._.iL_, C PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING Public Hearing ZC 90-10 August 1, 1990 PREPARED BY �4APPROVED BY:i ohn DeGange /- Dave GAfiderman Assistant Planner Comm. ev. Dir. OWNER Dexter Armstrong Post Office Box 901 Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 REQUESTED USE APPLICANT George Alongi Post Office Box 901 Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 This request is for a Zone Change of three parcels (371-071-001, 002, 003) from R-2 residential to R-3 residential. SIZE AND LOCATION The site is three adjacent parcels 9,000 square feet each for a total of 27,000 square feet at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Vacant R-2 High Density Residential North - Multi -Family R-2 High Density Residential Residential East - Single -Family R-2 High Density Residential Residential South - Abandoned R-2 High Density Commercial Residential West - Single -Family R-2 High Density Residential Residential BACKGROUND On July 18, 1990 Planning Commission approved Residential Project 90-10 and adopted Negative Declaration 90-24 contingent upon the approval of this request for a Zone Change. . PROJECT ZONING The current zoning for this site and its surrounding parcels is R-2. The General Plan Designation for this area, however, is High Density which corresponds to the zoning designation R-3. This proposed Zone Change from R-2 to R-3 would bring these parcels into conformance with the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental concerns for this Zone Change are addressed by Negative Declaration 90-24. �,_n PAGE—LOF RECOMMENDATION Public Hearing ZC 90-10 August 1, 1990 Page 2 It is recommended that Planning Commission recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-24 and approval of Zone Change 90-10 based on the following Findings. FINDINGS 1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. This request will bring the zoning for the project area into conformance with the General Plan. 3. This request and its associated project will not have a significant impact on the environment. ILA AGENDA ITE'r.NO. —4-4- PAC 7 OFI�-- �I Negative Declaration No. 90-24 Project: Residential Rrojxt 90-10 �:tiY. •.t..ta1.M r� fM • : r 1. Developer or Project: Contact Person: I Address: Post Offio Tel 2. Environmental I Sforma ion Address: l� City: e E inore 3. Proposed Project Title: Reside C : 02336 Prepared by: John De Q=p Total site acreage: Gross: et: ^62- For Residential Project: Number of units: 8 Dwelling units per acre: 12 9 Unit sizes (square feet): Triplexes 3,577 D 1px 2.993 Attach brief description of proposed project, including intended use, and phasing of project, or if present project is a phase or portion of a larger project. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by local, regional, state, and federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 5. Environmental Setting: Attach a description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and surrounding pro- perties, including information on topography, geo- logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. AGENDA ITEM,A�NO. — PAn- L� OF_Ia� GENERAL EXISTING LAND USE. ZONING PLAN Project site vacant R-2 High Density Surrounding lUlti-Family Residential R-2 High Density North Surrounding Single -Family R-2 High Density East Residential Surrounding Abandoned Com ercial R-2 High Density South Surrounding Single -Family R-2 High Density West Residnetial AGENDA ITEM,A�NO. — PAn- L� OF_Ia� Ir xi x xl x1 xi xl xl xl l i I I I I I I I I I I I S:Y s • 'o oD' °� wow % eC: HYD =avy i.'.M1I -"•,. .. oc .o "g.' L:gg -0, ao._.wi'� g 3 M1 .0v 'i •M i wV .w O • wL w • i w Yo. YG• i •EY %� �04 LGY° iM1 :EY +.11 DyyS� Y• �CC� °i C11 i• w0 .wiw �nM a0. ;: P� YC° OOYO C� O►•!■G`O �YG 0■aYcw •M1^� �E i so E M YYO•Y OY.r =SoL r. i YEY °.•. Mw O° y�•O ig yw w! Op °cS = YE° i CC cc ~ 7 cc a• -iyyii CC i L C w 0.° E C p� 6 C Y Y M1 O Y w. .: M1 0 9� M1 y E w O M1 �' ~ •• ° DC•r• wy.p1 • •p••C• °p w •Cp• $jy To Y �� O POO a. a •ti .. .v� YG $./iJ2 CC.0 gut y/wyyCi• �({+!•eL.E E9_�� Y✓1+ •rY •r .$.0 Y//✓` LCP COwY° i° E;iG:yYw iOi• WO ■PPP° EY w: ML •iE �s1 M aar OYM CO wcc. p�p9 yyPP C\ �Y°. • II Y O tM • i O O i� • Y O Yl.o SL • O • xi I X1 x I x I xl x I L y .} L . o Y ■ Y O Y Y Y w O M • i C I ✓ O y \ Y i Y u • • 1 1 O ,D =" O [ yC.. Y • f Y . Y• • M1 Y • w C O w M1 .Li .°�I O 6p C VI O • • �L ■Y Y Y • Y✓w r o. Oi 1 "MC >.s '�. C!i 'go C lD mo�i✓ } �• Y S a OM \ ■ C Y � O• � t C C � •r•*Ep It °1 Oy '""Y•✓.C€ WY.wi •.O YO • C ..° \ f0 0 �YYY•L QS u ".O i8'0 • 4 -00 O %Y�O•• pii w`S•r �r • S �� . t Y� a� Y Y Yy ✓OM1 Yi+ 4 Y CvipC sl :� .^!�.• •qt.000" Y G•• o •PP Un \ E'Y Y •O✓ �• COY Cori caio .M "= ••40Ms�� °cy i_✓w0.0 •'Y 0 04 Y1i E ✓ Cpw L DO L CY✓O r1Y •M1 • y�JrY• ✓ CYD Y9 YYO>. M •°C• °P1� �O w• O• www w wE g•• L°a• YY.• .� y.y .. s✓] YO •OL.� •.. • °.• •O Y �Ow.l O �CY PCJw Y; weC.•iwi Of.e Qom' ✓ c Y Y✓ Y .� i •• Y p.� Y Y^ �•• GGG DDD Y LA OY.w L •° °Y >. °L.1 •✓ °Y• E i° Ow O. Y/✓ 1 [[.. p w/wp 7Y wY• YCYCI+ Osea .1 GE0 AYd p!.�i i p�Y Y� Y�>•U . s.• pp>p } sSLC. .".Y D8 •✓D pY YppY ✓ Y ii. Y Yii D.G YY O Y•� mOC Fi .[{t^ : YY■O pati t0/L CiY PC✓O i0i dP✓Ow w r P i w H ^ O 6 O"+> \✓C •CEDywws�w EC w Yc �w010. OXY ►Ci o.i a a y Y u� Occ I G✓Y }DC>p..� fpp.r ✓� 10 woo, o♦pyC >i.O.0 YOC TEV ii>.Yw YY M°E O '✓ OOP° Eur att 1C1l=0ti €�wc cm✓0 YY OYwY •. D 1••.9 [g0.0 "Gu Y .✓ U 11O H Y r •° v it EoCc 0.^�� t� uQ .YiY E C Lb O iv iso[ 0•-�0 < Lu��6'�o :.a ip0io [GD.o SOY^ w Ypp�•�YY6Y p_OY°L VS V uuc p € o:eooi•g ux - P D6 O L LO D✓�✓ 6 !—. u o . U •^.•. 'j G �[ Y r a. Y f • 0 Y 6 xl I xl I xi xl I I I 11 I I w " ° me pIiEYYO �•g8: � ��' •g 4 g y o vim...✓ y.E.pJ Y wYP. • O Yo'>' Cc• �� LOOC I.r^YC w wg O1ti . w E aa ee•• C 8°• L'6 y1L oo s EE -a I,gg E• g .... vOM1 • ��B .S4 vE.B�YE $�'a • L E CY Y w S Y °.P.• 000 L•M1.°i .'. (°ASO wOCM YE.° OPO w oEY wp1Y• w•a•Y wYY L°� �OECAM° 9"E.Y s •LU J.L PC° a�J9 •Y..rD� �w Y°'� LLL•py CCC•OC • C i.YY •OL. ✓g Y•C ��tt 0+0 0.L.0 auo W. boon- <si fiou:io$^ Y�•••' we c • a Y O • M P ^ AGEtvDA ITUI NO. - 32 FAGS / OF -!.L__ xl xl CXI F I I I I 4 I I I w cp Y roai a_r•.OiY •_aM� � ei ow 6• wLOO Y•n0 • i�✓y YnYY• i � •MO {• y•• °Y Y • • r • C 8 Iw C:O • •E✓Cit •s.�Y° .•y�Y •PAY Zr S S&r'2.✓iC.i°Vpf p1.~ii■ it►� • S/Yy OVQ� Y>�•y✓ Y✓ ✓O IOC w•-ge ~ 806 r n0 wigo IZ •Mi w•• n•ri w •2.2 a• p O d O s � 4 XI 4 X1 4 xi xl A xi x I xl ml A xl xi '9 I I I I [ (( I I f I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 r n L .L clr • �✓ r • s 1 E•°oY� a e wP � y Y � •O � � K • � eco `aE�✓YMS log b �' •o¢• nr. Y aGwC P • E O Y �Y �r ^C iu►n✓Y✓ rY0•Y • Yr. LL n G ` � _' w•r✓2 L �R SO Y Y tiP y.✓•i �YO lOCC � Y w C-� ✓ ✓MOiC✓L w- L✓ ► � U L a CY i%YYe ✓�/•• Y �wp1 � � w �✓p• O wye r Y6 CLCO ✓ L --i °- t YY rL•Y� NEGM r Sy Y • sw OS`i OC spY�o0.✓ivY • Y Y•O •+ i►iNo- YY•Oi Y Y °e CY Cr w EO •BOYO iG6• L • O i✓ COLY •• w:w PL • • CJ•Y• •YY O w C • r.r !•Y nY • • Or C.✓.r PY i.. My •7:tt •G°0 Y Y ! O I.•O YEr■ �� LSCSr•> ✓ Y- e C w 0 • e ✓ n s Y n w O M Y•- L E ..1 _✓ w i •• g ✓ ✓ • w w <noY/• Y 0 Yt M"a •> O /OY YY 0 YO YY Lr ED •�O _ S 8 . Epa, L Y i i✓ Lw�Y Oa g'� DO i0.�0 .wi0 O• � i i o Y �Y •��•1 •iS SYCO Ho r Y•;a w/• -Y i <Y•✓a✓O► O' �Yls✓ • i Y O • �aoD/— • a u e i s = r n r � � xl xl x( xl xl xl xl xl x1 xl � � I I I I I i I I I I I I I • r ✓ y ix 1• L n r 1 I g i s ^ra a er `oe • o•�•a �� ON ioI - ."� �1 cC c ..• y� p0 �D wM Y g ✓ 8 � S •a~ •�^ � Y•• cp pS. .• Y7 i✓ • 00 wL .YO ✓2° p 59 Ow iY • n ✓: M>O p e9 8 • ■ g f.>�y i �'� YY, n aL! �i•yy�°O;Y. Ye ••�Y SIM��tD~•��8 OCY M✓� rYsv ot iY :- Y� Os iY CO catop .w ` i 0 yi- F\: O> •~ :FO EO�D O• L� pp e✓ Y n Y -C O/ Lrt Y✓ =0 Y • 1 ^LE �Q S•L OMC w r•�P wYn. • • �•YO iY LL LLU it •pp:• Y�:�Y�'�1. c�•l iw0 OL �OCMG Y:: YE\ Y�0 YMU nOVe i� �L eL0 D •YyY ir✓ne�0• CYLO • L✓mss nS YO LTC • DO✓ YYG✓OOYO ✓✓92 p•/w •• yr- ■•• <CO• <�✓ wyi� L✓YL ✓ C. Y�LO O•T & n Y L• - O It ^ r O L Y O e ✓ Y L L D O-- Y- i Z D✓` Y? . •^i Y Y LCL I� O O•♦ O OC/ <✓•CY✓•✓ Y Ca CY✓- : w i � ii ��✓ 00 i•YG /^i • O Y d Y a a c : a a c • � ^ AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGE /0 OF j C C ASSESSMENT FORM Residential Proiect 90-10 7. Environmental Impacts 1. Earth b. Small amounts of grading are being proposed for the project; however, impact will be small due to the small size of the project and the relatively flat characteristic of the site. /cm 3. Water b. Due to the nature of development in general, absorption rates will undoubtedly be impacted, but because the project is infill development existing drainage facilities exist and the increase in runoff should be minimal. AGENDA ITEM NO. —24— OF --`j- , FbR OFFICE USE ONLY C XU MAYBE NO I. RANDATORY FINDINGS 2E SSIGNIFICANCE: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California x history or prehistory? .— b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental x goals? — c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? a All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative declaration to be issued. II. DETTR".INATION: x The proposed project should not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. Although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, it will not in this case because of the attached mitigation measures. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. III. REVIEWED BY: PLANNING DIF I-23-86 : 6/27/90 : 6/27/90 LA AGENDA ITEt� NO. �oL.11���j— PAGE / � O`-3 • c c zoNE cN�N�E 90-�� V/c, R1 T y m it P CL Amu 12ADMIENP [ ��.' - � - =ROD ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP f h I jt f ...0 "R-2 •.. �' , 116E i es Cake / 3 � s: - Elsinore qO /] Q ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP f h I jt f o ...0 "R-2 •.. �' , / 3 � s: H qO /] Q SO Q /J 07/ Y B O O 7 2/ 1 x /4 /1- 56 i/6 1 /J /S YI 1 4 A O 1 1 o AGENDA ITEM; 2NO. PAGE / ✓ OF ...0 �X •.. �' °'� / 3 � s: 21 2/ 1 x /4 /1- 56 i/6 1 /J /S YI 4 A O O /S o 1 9 to tb x � s /OE 2 J iz --------- - 6 6(,WATL-,9 w AGENDA ITEM; 2NO. PAGE / ✓ OF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT MITIGATION FEE ORDINANCE PREPARED BY: _ PPROVED BY: 2E2sa4q �`� Har M. Strozi Dave �7 Berman he P ning Associates Comm .l ev. Dir. APPROVED BY: i 30' Mo endyk City Manager On October 31, 1988, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (SKR) as an'endangered species. Federal law prohibits any "taking" of an endangered species. "Taking" is defined as any activity that would harm, kill or harass these animals. Federal law also provides for a method to allow "incidental" takings subject to a "Section 10 (a)" Permit. This permit process requires the development of a plan which provides for the continued existence of the species. Such a plan, called a Habitat Conservation Plan, must accompany any Section 10 (a) Permit application. DISCUSSION Several documents were adopted on May 22, 1990, and June 26, 1990, by the City Council as part of the Section 10 (a) Permit including: Interim Habitat Conservation Plan, FEIR/FEIS for the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan, Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, Memorandum of Understanding, Implementation Agreement, and Allocation of the Take. On June 13, 1989, the City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance in response to the listing of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat as an endangered species. This Interim Ordinance has been updated twice since that time. Because the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan has now been adopted, it is necessary to bring the ordinance into conformance with the adopted short-term Habitat Conservation Plan. The Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance requires the payment of a mitigation fee by applicants for development permits within the boundaries of the Fee Assessment Area unless mitigation fees are $1,950 per gross acre for the parcels proposed for development. However, for single-family residential development, wherein all lots within the development are greater than one-half gross area in size, the mitigation fee is $1,000 per residential unit. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance. AGENDA ITEM NO. 115 PAGE 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 9 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCES. NO. 866, 859, AND 869 AND ADOPTING THE STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT MITIGATION FEE ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore did adopt an Interim Ordinance No. 866 pursuant to Government Code Section 65952 on October 24,1489, and WHEREAS, the City Council did adopt Interim Ordinance No. 859 pursuant to Government Code Section 65952 on June 13, 1989, and WHEREAS, the City Council did adopt Interim Ordinance No. 869 pursuant to Government Code Section 65952 on November 14, 1989, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan and implementing documents on May 22, 1990, and June 26, 1990, which nullify Interim Ordinances 866, 859, and 869. NOW THEREFORE BE IT DETERMINED AND ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct; 2. Said ordinance shall provide as follows: SECTION 1. TITLE. This Ordinance shall be known as the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance. SECTION 2. FINDINGS. The City Council finds and determines that: (a) The Stephens' kangaroo rat is listed as a threatened species by the State of California, and the California Department of Fish and Game has recommended changing its status to endangered. (b) The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has listed the Stephens' kangaroo rat as an endangered species, effective October 31, 1988, pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et. seq. (c) Following the Federal listing of the Stephens' kangaroo rat as an endangered species, the occupied habitat of the species may not be altered without a Section 10(a) permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior. All requests for a Section 10(a) permit must be accompanied by a Habitat Conservation Plan approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Said permit will then allow for the loss of occupied habitat due to development on the basis that the Habitat Conservation Plan will provide protection for the species and guarantee its survival. (d) Development within the historical range of the Stephens' kangaroo rat has resulted in loss and degradation of occupied Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat, increased isolation of Stephens' kangaroo rat populations, reduction of potential habitat areas for future colonization, and elimination of corridors which allow the species to relocate as environmental conditions warrant. AGENDA ITEM NO. 35 PAGE 2- OF 6q (e) The Stephens' kangaroo rat's survival cannot be insured on small isolated acreages surrounded by, or in close Proximity to, development or human populations. (f) Impacts to the Stephens' kangaroo rat are not limited to loss or degradation of actually occupied habitat only. (g) The successful completion and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat would be jeopardized by not implementing a procedure that requires review of each proposed development within the fee assessment area to determine the best means of mitigating impacts to the Stephens' kangaroo rat. (h) Each proposed development project shall be reviewed to determine the most appropriate course of action to ensure the survival of the species through one or more of the following: (1) On-site mitigation of impacts to the Stephens' kangaroo rat through the reservation or addition of lands included within or immediately adjacent to a potential habitat reserve site, or (2) Payment of the Mitigation Fee set by this ordinance, or (3) Any combination of (1) and (2) consistent with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance. A proposed development project may be referred, for review, to Federal and state resource agencies based upon criteria which may be established and agreed upon by the City, the County, and said agencies. (i) A program providing for on-site project mitigation in accordance with the development of a Habitat Conservation Plan will provide a mechanism for establishing sufficient habitat areas which can be effectively protected and managed for the Stephens' kangaroo rat's survival and recovery. (j) Immediate implementation of this Ordinance is necessary to make use of other potential funding opportunities for the development and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat. (k) The successful completion of a Habitat Conservation Plan depends upon providing protection to potential habitat reserve sites until the mechanisms for land acquisition contained within the Plan can be put into effect. (1) All Mitigation Fees collected pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the development, preparation and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat, including, but not limited to, the acquisition and management of habitat reserve sites, and for the application of a Section 10(a) permit under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as well as authorization to take the species pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act. (m) Adoption of this Ordinance will provide mitigation for projects within the historical range of the Stephens' kangaroo rat allowing said projects to proceed during the preparation and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat, provided said projects are not located in areas identified as and meeting the criteria for potential habitat reserve sites needed for the conservation of the species. The approval of such development projects could jeopardize the survival of the species and therefore would be inconsistent with a Habitat Conservation Plan, even if the Mitigation Fee is paid. IV AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE 3 OF ✓ ' (n) Adoption and implementation of this Ordinance demonstrates the City's intent to cooperate with federal and state agencies to provide for the survival of the Stephens' kangaroo rat. (o) The passage of this Ordinance is intended to be consistent with the requirements of state and federal environmental legislation, including the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Ordinance is to finance the preparation, development and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan, including the acquisition of habitat reserve sites, and the application for a Section 10(a) permit under the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973. It is the further purpose of this Ordinance to provide a method for mitigation of impacts to the Stephens' kangaroo rat caused by the loss of its habitat due to development during the preparation and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan and provide for habitat mitigation to be identified in the Habitat Conservation Plan. Mitigation of impacts to the Stephens' kangaroo rat will be accomplished through the review of each proposed development project within the Fee Assessment Area to determine whether on-site mitigation through the reservation or addition of lands included within or immediately adjacent to a potential habitat reserve site or payment of the mitigation fee or a combination of both is appropriate and furthers the ultimate Habitat Conservation Plan objectives. A proposed development project may be referred, for review, to federal and state resources agencies based upon criteria which may be established and agreed upon by the city, the county and said agencies. This Ordinance provides for the establishment of this review process and satisfaction of on-site mitigation to protect potential habitat reserve sites or payment of the Mitigation Fee or a combination of both, which upon implementation will satisfy U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, County of Riverside, as well as City mitigation requirements for the Stephens' kangaroo rat and its habitat which may occur within the City designated herein. SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (a) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3_ PAGE OF R (b) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. "Certificate of Occupancy" shall mean a certificate of occupancy as defined by state law. (c) CITY. The City of Lake Elsinore. (d) COUNTY. The County of Riverside. (e) DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. City approval of a tentative tract map, tentative parcel map, conditional use permit, public use permit, plot plan, surface mining permit, or grading Permit pursuant to the provisions of all applicable City ordinances. Where a development project has been previously reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance, any subsequent implementing development permit shall not be subject to further review under this Ordinance. (f) FEE ASSESSMENT AREA. All real property located within the area described in Section 5 of this Ordinance. (g) FINAL INSPECTION. "Final Inspection" shall mean a final inspection as defined by the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition, or state law. (h) HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. A plan prepared pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. Section 1539. (i) MITIGATION FEE. The fee imposed pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance. (j) PARCEL. All real property for which a development permit is applied for. (k) RESIDENTIAL UNIT. A building or portion thereof used by one (1) family and containing but one (1) kitchen, and designed for single-family residential purpose only. (1) SECTION 10(a) PERMIT. A permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. Section 1539. (m) STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT. An animal species known as Dipodomys Stephensi. (n) GRADING PERMIT. "Grading Permit" shall mean a grading permit as defined by the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition, provided, however, that for purposes of the Ordinance, "grading permit" shall not include the following: (1) A grading permit wherein grading was previously performed pursuant to a grading permit issued within one (1) year prior to November 15, 1988, and subsequently inspected and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore Department of Building and Safety. In addition, the area to be graded pursuant to said permit shall be the same or substantially the same area previously graded. (2) A grading permit for real property upon which a detached or attached second unit will be constructed pursuant to Section 17.17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 5. DESIGNATION OF THE FEE ASSESSMENT AREA. All those certain lands located in the City of Lake Elsinore, State of California, as hereinafter particularly described, and hereby designated as the Fee Assessment Area described as follows: Said Fee Assessment Area is AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGE OF�,�_ (See attached Legal Description) SECTION 6. MITIGATION FEE. All applicants for development permits within the boundaries of the Fee Assessment Area who cannot satisfy mitigation requirements through on-site mitigation as determined through the environmental review process shall pay a Mitigation Fee of $1,950 per gross acre of the parcels proposed for development. However, for single-family residential development, wherein all lots within the development are greater than one-half (1/2) gross acre in size, and Mitigation Fee of $1,000 per residential unit shall be paid, and for agricultural development which requires a development permit, a Mitigation Fee of $2 per square foot of the buildings to be constructed shall be paid provided that at no time shall such fee exceed the amount required to be paid if a fee of $1,950 per gross acre were applied to the parcel proposed for agricultural development. SECTION 7. IMPOSITION OF FEE. No development permit for real property located within the boundaries of the Fee Assessment Area shall be issued or approved except upon the condition that on- site mitigation will be provided as determined through the environmental review process or the Mitigation Fee required by this Ordinance be paid, and it is determined that said development will not jeopardize the implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat. SECTION 8. PAYMENT OF FEE. The Mitigation Fee shall be paid upon issuance of a grading permit or a Certificate of Occupancy or upon final inspection, whichever occurs first. Payment of the Mitigation Fee shall satisfy City conditions of approval previously placed on development permits with regard to impact mitigation for the Stephens' kangaroo rat which have not been previously satisfied and no further review and approval pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance shall be required. SECTION 9. REDUCTION FOR NON-PROFIT ENTITIES. The fees required pursuant to Section 6 shall be reduced by 75 percent for non-profit entities. For purposes of this section, non-profit entities shall be defined as those entities identified in 26 U.S.C. Section 501(c) (3). SECTION 10. EXEMPTIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following types of development shall not be required to pay the AGENDA ITEM NO. �_ PAGE OF� Mitigation Fee unless such development voluntarily participates in order to mitigate the disturbance of occupied Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat: (a) Reconstruction of any structure damaged or destroyed by fire or other natural causes; (b) Rehabilitation or remodeling of existing structures, or additions to existing structures; (c) Development of any parcel for which the California Department of Fish and Game has approved other mitigation procedures; (d) Development of any parcel owned and used by local, state or federal governments for governmental purposes (i.e. public works, schools); (e) Development of any parcel for which the Mitigation Fee has been previously paid. However, in instances where the fee previously paid was the fee for single-family residential development, wherein all lots within the development were greater than 1/2 gross acre in size, and the applicant for a development permit subsequently requests an increase in residential density or a change from a residential to a non-residential use, or in instances where the fee previously paid was the fee for agricultural development and the applicant for a development permit subsequently requests a change from an agricultural to a residential, commercial or industrial use, the fee shall be recalculated for the new density or use pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance. Any difference between the recalculated fee and the previously paid fee shall be required to be paid by the applicant. (f) The construction of public utility transmission facilities where ground surface is minimal or where substantially all of the disturbed ground surface can be restored to its original condition as may be determined by the Community Development Director. Said exemption shall not include substations, treatment facilities or pumping stations. (g) Development of any parcel for which approval of a tentative tract map, tentative parcel map, conditional use permit, public us permit, plot plan or surface mining permit is sought and said development will not require the construction of new or additional buildings or the grading of the parcel which may be considered negligible for insignificant as determined by the Community Development Director. (h) Development of any parcel for which approval of an amendment, minor change or revision to a tentative tract map or tentative parcel map is sought; or development of any parcel for which approval of a request for substantial conformance or a revised conditional use permit, public use permit or plot plan is sought; and all grading permits necessary for the development of the parcel have previously been issued. SECTION 11. REFUND. In the event that the fee provided for by the final Habitat Conservation Plan is less than the Mitigation Fee paid, the current property owner of record may apply for a partial refund of said fee. The amount of any refund due shall be determined by the City in its sole discretion after review of said application and shall be limited to the funds collected in AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 2 OF excess of any amount received as a credit against the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan and Mitigation Fee. SECTION 12. FEE ADJUSTMENT. The City Council may periodically review and cause an adjustment to be made to the Mitigation Fee. By amendment to this Ordinance, the fee may be increased or decreased to reflect changes in estimated costs for the development, preparation and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan. The adjustment in the fee may also reflect changes in estimated revenues received pursuant to this Ordinance, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to prepare and implement the Habitat Conservation Plan. Any adjustment in the fee shall be prospective only and shall become effective as of the date any such amendment is effective, provided, however, that the amount of the Mitigation Fee for any development permit shall be the fee in effect at the time of payment. SECTION 13. FEE ADMINISTRATION. All Mitigation Fees collected pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deposited into a Mitigation Fee Account. Funds in said account shall be expanded solely for the development, preparation and implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat, including the acquisition of habitat reserve sites, and for the application for a Section 10(a) permit under the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973. SECTION 14. VALIDITY. This Ordinance and the various parts, sections and clauses thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or entity is adjudge unconstitutional or invalid, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall affect only such part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause of this Ordinance, or person or entity; and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, parts, sentences, paragraphs, sections or clauses of this Ordinance, or its application to other persons or entities. The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been adopted had such unconstitutional or invalid part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause of this j AGENDA ITEM NO.at�LG.�� PAGE OFi� 1� Ordinance not been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted from the application of this Ordinance. SECTION 15. CREDIT. Where a development project is subject to the provisions of a Development Agreement entered into with the City pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65864 et. seq, and the project involves the construction of residential units, the Mitigation Fee required to be paid pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance shall be reduced by $175 per residential unit. SECTION 16. URGENCY MEASURE. This Ordinance is an urgency measure and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Ordinance No. 869 previously provided for termination of the Mitigation Fee upon issuance of a Section 10(a) Permit. It is anticipated that the Secretary of the Interior will approve an Interim Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat and issue a Section 10(a) permit during the month of July 1990. The Mitigation Fee is a required component of the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat. It is therefore necessary that this Ordinance be adopted as an urgency measure in order for the Mitigation Fee to remain in effect and for the immediate preservation of the species and the public peace, health and safety. The City Council declares that this Ordinance shall be construed as a continuation of existing Ordinance No. 869 and not as a new enactment, except as to any provisions of this Ordinance, which are inconsistent therewith. Any development permit previously issued pursuant to Ordinances No. 869, 866, and 859 therewith shall be deemed to comply with this Ordinance. AGENDA ITEM��NO. PAGE - [[.L._ OF 21 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote, AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing'Ordinance had its first reading on August 28, 1990 and had its second reading on September 11, 1990 and was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEMNO- PAGE . nnOF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. , of said Council, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) AGENDA ITEM, NO. PAGE OF- l F 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LRALD J. O[ERll NQS COUNTY COUNSEL SURES sss IDTNSTREET "*E DE CQIFORNI, STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT FEE ASSESSMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTJON Beginning at the intersection of the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 West with the northerly boundary line of the County of Riverside, California. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Sections 12 and 13, Township 2 South, Range 5 Brest to the Southwest corner thereof. -7- AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 1Z OF .rw 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 anwn I mnusGs COmTY COUNSEL SURE" Atl IMMS BEET IMRS*E rAUFMNI. Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 13 and the South line of Sections 18 and 17, Township 2 South, Range 4 West to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Sections 21, 28 and 33, Township 2 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of Section 5, Township 3 South, Range 4 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 5 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of Section 7, Township 3 South, Range 4 West and the North line of Sections 12, 11 and 10, Township 3 South, Range 5 West to its intersection with the centerline of Victoria Avenue in the City of Riverside, California. Thence Southwesterly along said centerline of Victoria Avenue to its intersection with the North line of Section 19, Township 3 South, Range 5 West. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 19 and the North line of Section 24, Township 3 South, Range 6 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 24 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of Sections 26 and 27, Township 3 South, Range 6 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 27 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 3 South, Range 6 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 28 and the West line of the East 1/2 of Section 33, Township 3 South, Range 6 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 6 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 and the South line of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of said Section 4 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Section 9, Township 4 South, Range 6 West to the Southwest corner thereof. _8_ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 13 OF V r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .EPALV 1. GEERUwGS E(R CT NSE. SLM 30C SUS I"H STREET WMRLI E C IFNIA Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of said Section 9 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Section 15, Township 4 South, Range 6 West to the centerline of Cajalco Road. j i Thence Southwesterly along the said centerline of Cajalco Road to its intersection with the centerline of Interstate 15. Thence Southeasterly along said centerline Interstate 15 to its intersection with the West line of Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 6 West. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 1 and the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 6 West to the Southwest 1/4 thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 12 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 12 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Section 18 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 17, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Section 17 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the South 1/2 of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 16 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the North 1/2 of Section 2, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the North 1/2 of said Section 22 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of -9- AGENDA ITEM NO.--� PAGE /� OF -25 Z-- rE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERA D+GUMUNGS CCXJ"COUNSEL SUITE ] E]S MO S"FET MNL$$ E.CALIFMK,A Section 23, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 23 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 26 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 25 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the East 1/2 of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 5 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of said Section 36 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 8 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 8 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 8 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Section 16, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. -10- AGENDA ITER h7. 3S PAGE t 1 2 3 4 5 61 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "RJ J. GEERUNGS COUNT COUNSEL SURE 300 3535 IOTM STREET WMSIDE. CALIFp NIA Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 16 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the West 1/2 of Section 22, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the West 1/2 of said Section 22 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 27, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 27 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26 and the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 35 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 35 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the south line of projected Section 35 and Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 4 West to its intersection with the Northerly Boundary Line of The Santa Rosa Rancho. Thence Northwesterly and Southwesterly along said boundary line to its intersection with the centerline of Via Serreno. Thence Southwesterly along said centerline of Via Serreno and the centerline of Hombre Lane to its intersection with the centerline of Avenida La Cresta. Thence Southeasterly along said centerline of Avenida La Cresta to its intersection with the centerline of Sierra Maria Road. Thence Northerly along the centerline of Sierra Maria Road to its intersection with the centerline of Buenos Tiempos Road. Thence Northwesterly along said centerline of Buenos Tiempos Road to its intersection with the centerline of Via Caballos. Thence Southwesterly and Northwesterly along said centerline of Via Caballos to its intersection with the centerline of Avenida Castilla. Thence Northeasterly along said centerline of Avenida Castilla to its intersection with the centerline of Avenida La Cresta. Thence Northwesterly along said centerline of Avenida La Cresta -11- AGENDA !TL. [v0. 35 PAGE ' � pP5q_ Im 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD! GEERUNGS CERT COUNSEL SURE 300 3"S IOTM STREET RNERSIDE CAVE NI. to its intersection with Calle Centro. Thence Northerly along said centerline of Calle Centro to its intersection with Avenida Arbolos. Thence Easterly along said centerline of Avenida Arbolos to its intersection with the centerline of Via Majorca. Thence Northeasterly along said centerline of Via Majorca to its intersection with Via Vista Grande. Thence northeasterly along said centerline of Via Vista Grande to the most Westerly corner of Parcel 7 of Record of Survey recorded in Book 54, Page 59, in The County of Riverside, California. Thence North 74 Degrees 38139" East a distance of 532.451. Thence North 04 Degrees 15122" East a distance of 800.00'. Thence South 85 Degrees 44138" East a distance of 4011.731. Thence North 54 Degrees 49'53" East a distance of 1308.88' to the Northeasterly boundary line of The Santa Rosa Rancho. Thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly boundary line to the most Easterly corner of Parcel 3 of a Parcel Map recorded in Book 106, Pages 29 through 36, in The County of Riverside, California. Thence continuing South 47 Degrees 19'01" East along said Northeasterly boundary line a distance of 8883.691. Thence leaving said boundary line South 41 Degrees 42123" West a distance of 185.621. Thence South 13 Degrees 07127" East a distance of 185.971. Thence South 43 Degrees 24126" West a distance of 1230.441. Thence South 11 Degrees 33109" West a distance of 1121.891. Thence South 64 Degrees 12110" West a distance of 1753.24" to an angle point in the boundary of Parcel Map No. 19515 recorded in Book 119, Pages 27 and 28, in the County of Riverside, California. Thence Southwesterly along said boundary South 85 Degrees 50107" West a distance of 1083.421. Thence North 02 Degrees 26146" East a distance of 1171.031. Thence North 51 Degrees 08117" East a distance of 311.411. Thence North 42 Degrees 05120" West a distance of 443.631. Thence North 17 Degrees 33108" West a distance of 556.921. -12- AGE1DA ITEM. NO. 3.5 PAGE ! ! OF 52 Ohl r 1 2 3 4 5 6, 71 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 la 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALV J GEERLIMGS COUNT COUNSEL SURE 300 3535IOTN STREET RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA Thence North 03 Degrees 11126" East a distance of 751.381. Thence North 47 Degrees 40131" West a distance of 226.421. Thence South 49 Degrees 25104" West a distance of 740.541. Thence North 54 Degrees 33151" West a distance of 1187.101. Thence North 30 Degrees 57150" East a distance of 870.64.' Thence North 79 Degrees 18105" West a distance of 584.421. Thence North 39 Degrees 00128" West a distance of 386.671. Thence South 60 Degrees 08158" West a distance of 358.061. Thence South 35 Degrees 51119" West a distance of 1063.121. Thence North 12 Degrees 26134" West a distance of 858.581. Thence North 30 Degrees 44133" East a distance of 481.791. Thence North 68 Degrees 19130" West a distance of 462.921. Thence South 72 Degrees 55147" West a distance of 418.381. Thence North 79 Degrees 18103" West a distance of 397.361. Thence North 08 Degrees 58106" East a distance of 701.961. Thence North 79 Degrees 34151" West a distance of 817.941. Thence South 69 Degrees 36106" West a distance of 329.911. Thence South 26 Degrees 53149" West a distance of 580.011. Thence South 79 Degrees 38143" West a distance of 785.061. Thence leaving said Parcel Map boundary in a Northwesterly direction North 52 Degrees 24141" West a distance of 4453.07' to an angle point in the boundary line of Parcel Map No. 19516, recorded in Book 119, Pages 22 through 26, in the County of Riverside, California. Thence continuing Northwesterly along said boundary line North 69 Degrees 45126" West a distance of 661.92' to the centerline of Clinton Keith Road as shown on said Parcel Map. Thence Southerly along said centerline of Clinton Keith Road South 15 Degrees 58145" West a distance of 1167.820 to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the East, and having a radius of 3600.001. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 14 Degrees 21120" and having a length of 901.991. -13- AGCh:✓A ;TEM No. PAGI-E _ OF . / 1 w 1 2 3 4 5 6 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 aERua,. GEERUNcs CCX i CWMSEL SUER 3W 15]5 -IDEM STREET RM1'UIUM CALIFORNIA Thence South 01 Degrees 37125" West a distance of 1010.95' to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the East, and having a radius of 6000.00'. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 05 Degrees 03133" and having a length of 529.791. Thence South 03 Degrees 26108" East a distance of 456.53' to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the West, and having a radius of 2000.00' Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 15 Degrees 40122" and having a length of 547.081. Thence leaving said centerline in a Westerly direction North 74 Degrees 25138" West a distance of 7844.89' to an angle point on the most Westerly boundary line of Parcel Map No. 22375, recorded in Book 144, Pages 7 through 10, in The County of Riverside, California. Thence Southerly along said boundary line South 12 Degrees 47119" West a distance of 1707.191. Thence South 21 Degrees 58158" West a distance of 3527.68' to a point on the centerline of Sierra Allena as shown on said Parcel Map. Thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Tenaja Road as shown on said Parcel Map. Thence Southwesterly and Southerly along said centerline to a point, said point also being an intersection with the centerline of Avacado Mesa as shown on Parcel Map 19516, recorded in Book 119, Page 22 through 26, in The County of Riverside, California. Said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave to the North, and having a radius of 1400.001. A radial line from said point bears South 00 Degrees 22128" West. Thence Easterly along said curve and said centerline of Avacado Mesa through a central angle of 10 Degrees 04102" and having a length of 245.991. Thence North 80 Degrees 18126" East a distance of 559.101. Thence leaving said centerline along the Southerly boundary line of said Parcel Map South 01 Degrees 58118" East a distance of 1125.46'. Thence North 55 Degrees 45124" East a distance of 819.601. Thence South 75 Degrees 03127" East a distance of 797.861. Thence South 47 Degrees 33158" East a distance of 608.301. Thence North 35 Degrees 37125 East a distance of 978.341. -14- AGENDA IT ct/�iNO. PAG= _1q OF OF� I i- r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UERA DJ GEERUNGS COUNT COUNSEL SUITE 300 3SM-10TH STREET RMRSIDE OKIEOR11. Thence North 87 Degrees 44952" East a distance of 839.899. Thence North 62 Degrees 38114" East a distance of 2703.031. Thence South 54 Degrees 15129" East a distance of 617.251. Thence North 78 Degrees 40127" East a distance of 1462.830. Thence South 69 Degrees 27130" East a distance of 2370.441. Thence South 20 Degrees 06129" East a distance of 1570.291. Thence North 56 Degrees 07125" East a distance of 777.48'. Thence North 15 Degrees 23124" East a distance of 906.541. Thence North 86 Degrees 25118" East a distance of 1321.76'. Thence North 65 Degrees 36125" East a distance of 300.23'. Thence North 19 Degrees 24'52" West a distance of 4974.39'. Thence North 01 Degrees 51'13" East a distance of 785.931. Thence North 32 Degrees 04145" West a distance of 380.82'. Thence North 61 Degrees 22138" West a distance of 669.330. Thence leaving the boundary of said Parcel Map North 45 Degrees 01103" East a distance of 5251.91' to an angle point in the Northwesterly boundary line said Parcel Map No. 19516. Thence Southeasterly along said boundary line South 15 Degrees 08'17" East a distance of 1653.191. Thence South 27 Degrees 02139" West a distance of 368.261. Thence South 02 Degrees 47123" East a distance of 742.67'. Thence South 53 Degrees 14'19" East a distance of 720.311. Thence South 19 Degrees 31144" East a distance of 916.701. Thence North 84 Degrees 07141" East a distance of 711.711. Thence South it Degrees 22153" East a distance of 424.061. Thence South 54 Degrees 58153" East a distance of 179.721. Thence North 61 Degrees 33154" East a distance of 396.561. Thence South 18 Degrees 51158" East a distance of 636.641. Thence North 52 Degrees 26117" East a distance of 1090.831. Thence South 54 Degrees 33149" East a distance of 612.681. -15- AGENDA ITEM NO. f �_ PAGE -" OF w It 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GM0jb1.GEERL G5 COI COO SEL WM X0 1SLCTCf STREET nvERswE. cwLuoRNu Thence South 13 Degrees 02107" East a distance of 1024.251. Thence South 36 Degrees 58148" East a distance of 526.981. Thence South 76 Degrees 34031" East a distance of 681.251. Thence South 54 Degrees 54112" East a distance of 941.25'. Thence North 69 Degrees 28121" East a distance of 553.521. Thence South 74 Degrees 21123" East a distance of 653.97'. Thence North 38 Degrees 52'12" West a distance of 2216.151. Thence North 28 Degrees 21103" East a distance of 456.681. Thence North 81 Degrees 12102" East a distance of 709.991. Thence leaving the boundary line of said Parcel Map South 24 Degrees 58152" East a distance of 405.02' to the most westerly corner of Parcel 84 of Parcel Map recorded in Book 2, pages 42 through 68, in the County of Riverside, California. Thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly boundary line of said Parcel 84 North 43 Degrees 04123" East a distance of 1355.03' to the most Westerly corner of Parcel 85 of said Parcel Map. Thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly boundary line of said Parcel 85 North 65 Degrees 35921" East a distance of 1437.56' to the centerline of DeLuz Road. Thence Northerly and Northeasterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northeasterly boundary line of The Santa Rosa Rancho. Thence along said boundary line South 47 Degrees 19101" East a distance of 6731.561. Thence South 47 Degrees 18154" East a distance of 2168.171. Thence South 39 Degrees 48145" East a distance of 5192.671. Thence leaving said boundary line North 44 Degrees 52056" East a distance of 2590.77' Thence South 45 Degrees 05153" East a distance of 1431.391. Thence South 44 Degrees 55154" West a distance of 793.371. Thence South 38 Degrees 21'30" East a distance of 2638.92' to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave to the North, and having a radius of 4550.001. A radial line bears North 00 Degrees 37107" West. Thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of -16- AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ek. J. GEEMUNGS CIX)NTY COUNSEL RR " 3535-IMSt EET WEIISOE CA4FcgNIA 06 Degrees 19100" and having a length of 501.621. Thence North 83 Degrees 03153" East a distance of 1140.231. Thence South 06 Degrees 56107" East a distance of 44.001. Thence South 26 Degrees 16104" East a distance of 369.981. Thence South 00 Degrees 43159" West a distance of 259.981. Thence South 71 Degrees 46111" East a distance of 305.001. Thence South 54 Degrees 16111" East a distance of 380.001. Thence South 85 Degrees 16127" East a distance of 439.971. Thence South 53 Degrees 46116" East a distance of 269.991. Thence South 33 Degrees 59130" East a distance of 348.671. Thence South 45 Degrees 28143" East a distance of 300.811. Thence South 45 Degrees 30101" East a distance of 226.241. Thence South 45 Degrees 28143t1 East a distance of 1954.041. Thence South 44 Degrees 31114" West a distance of 206.391. Thence South 15 Degrees 3912111 East a distance of 1945.581. Thence South 45 Degrees 2610411 East a distance of 1495.921. Thence South 19 Degrees 54154" East a distance of 235.931. Thence South 70 Degrees 1214011 West a distance of 1495.311. Thence South 33 Degrees 28143" East a distance of 543.701. Thence South 39 Degrees 4514911 East a distance of 408.241. Thence South 49 Degrees 0411111 East a distance of 1528.811. Thence South 50 Degrees 0712111 West a distance of 2306.791. Thence North 39 Degrees 47124" West a distance of 370.041 to the Southeasterly boundary line of The Santa Rosa Rancho. Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly boundary line of the Santa Rosa Rancho to its intersection with the West line of Section 24, Township 8 South, Range 3 West. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 24 and the West line of Sections 25 and 36, Township 8 South, Range 3 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Said corner also being a point on the Southerly boundary line of the County of Riverside, -17- PAGE 2-2- OF a 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11; 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mcuso, GEUM MGS Cot M?V COEMSEL sUrE W A75 70THSMtEr "RUM CALWORMA California. Thence Easterly along said Southerly boundary line to its intersection with the East line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 33, Township a South, Range 2 West. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 33 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 28, Township 8 South, Range 2 West to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 28 to its intersection with the Southeasterly boundary line of the Little Temecula Rancho. Thence from said intersection Northeasterly to the intersection of the centerline of De Portola Rd. and the centerline of Butterfield Stage Rd. Thence along said centerline of De Portola Rd. a distance of 1110.00' said point being on a line between the Southeast corner of Section 14, Township 7 South, Range 2 West and the intersection of the North-South quarter section line of Section 28, Township 8 South, Range 2 West with the Southerly boundary line of The Little Temecula Rancho. Said line hereinafter referred to as Line "A". Thence along said line "A" South 21 Degrees 03143" West a distance of 3503.491. Thence leaving said line "A" North 83 Degrees 52128" East a distance of 1391.95' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northeast and having a radius of 2000.001. Thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of O1 Degrees 07157" a distance of 39.531. Thence North 22 Degrees 56122" West a distance of 295.47' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 3000.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of O1 Degrees 24'38" a distance of 73.861. Thence tangent from said curve North 81 Degrees 39'22" East a distance of 2497.32' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 4200.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 10 Degrees 54122" a distance of 799.461. Thence tangent from said curve North 70 Degrees 45100" East a distance of 5147.52' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave (� -18- AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE OF�� 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22. 23 24 25 26 27 28 apJ J. GEERUJ Gs COUNTY COUNSEL SURE ] IS75 IOTM STREET RMRSIDE. CALIFORNIA Southerly and having a radius of 4200.001. Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 17 Degrees 00024" a distance of 1246.291. Thence tangent from said curve North 87 Degrees 45106" East a distance of 1635.73' to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 6250.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 36 Degrees 39121" a distance of 3998.531. Thence tangent from said curve North 51 Degrees 05145" East a distance of 2355.02' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 10540.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 15 Degrees 30113" a distance of 2852.041. Thence South 20 Degrees 58119" East a distance of 325.30' to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 3000.001. A radial line bears North 23 Degrees 23140" West. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 57 Degrees 07125" a distance of 2991.74'. Thence South 86 Degrees 39142" East a distance of 284.321. Thence South 46 Degrees 49132" East a distance of 555.371. Thence South 38 Degrees 39135" East a distance of 224.111. Thence South 51 Degrees 24155" East a distance of 185.071. Thence South 80 Degrees 50116" East a distance of 157.001. Thence North 88 Degrees 31125" East a distance of 194.061. Thence North 62 Degrees 25122" East a distance of 632.911. Thence North 38 Degrees 17125" East a distance of 435.731. Thence North 22 Degrees 28146" East a distance of 156.921. Thence North 40 Degrees 01149' East a distance of 163.251. Thence South 65 Degrees 57121" East a distance of 142.351. Thence North 10 Degrees 10109" East a distance of 226.561. Thence North 61 Degrees 41157" East a distance of 295.301. Thence North 88 Degrees 27106" East a distance of 185.071. Thence South 66 Degrees 48105" East a distance of 228.471. -19- AGENDA ii_ `f. ii�O..f��� G' PAGE �— _--'- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 eewn j. GCExUmcs CCXWT'CWNSEL SU fE JOo xu- ion�srnetr MKIIS�DE. CwLnOnau Thence South 15 Degrees 27130' East a distance of 420.201. Thence South 29 Degrees 10158" East a distance of 303.531. Thence South 43 Degrees 59142" East a distance of 201.561. Thence South 56 Degrees 18136" East a distance of 246.331. Thence South 78 Degrees 06141" East a distance of 97.081. Thence South 01 Degrees 58103" East a distance of 145.091. Thence South 25 Degrees 13116" East a distance of 152.541. Thence North 27 Degrees 26106" East a distance of 206.191. Thence South 49 Degrees 53157" East a distance of 248.391. Thence North 87 Degrees 03151" East a distance of 390.511. Thence North 68 Degrees 38101" East a distance of 397.401. Thence North 56 Degrees 46106" East a distance of 173.351. Thence North 62 Degrees 06110" East a distance of 288.531. Thence North 53 Degrees 23134" East a distance of 218.001. Thence South 04 Degrees 23155" West a distance of 130.381. Thence South 26 Degrees 33154" West a distance of 368.951. Thence South 36 Degrees 09130" West a distance of 322.021. Thence South 27 Degrees 19126" West a distance of 337.681. Thence South 22 Degrees 30146" West a distance of 445.19' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 250.001. Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 112 Degrees 58116" a distance of 492.931. Thence tangent to said curve North 89 Degrees 32130" East a distance of 247.521. Thence South 81 Degrees 07109" East a distance of 161.941. Thence South 13 Degrees 14126" West a distance of 87.321. Thence South 73 Degrees 14115" East a distance of 86.681. Thence North 19 Degrees 17124" East a distance of 127.141. Thence North 77 Degrees 49143" East a distance of 260.861. -20- AGENDA ITEM N PAGE v" OF----+-- 1 Thence South 85 Degrees 41160" East a distance of 133.381. 2 Thence North 62 Degrees 51101" East a distance of 131.491. 3 Thence North 78 Degrees 41124" East a distance of 127.481. 4 Thence South 69 Degrees 26138" East a distance of 128.161. 5 Thence South 42 Degrees 461 03" East a distance of 544.891. 6 Thence North 25 Degrees 38128" East a distance of 544.891. 7 Thence South 49 Degrees 53157" East a distance of 248.391. 8 Thence South 17 Degrees 06110" East a distance of 136.011. 9 Thence North 11 Degrees 04113" East a distance of 234.361. 10 Thence South 86 Degrees 54121" East a distance of 185.271. 11 Thence South 09 Degrees 51157" East a distance of 116.731. 12 Thence North 46 Degrees 32154" East a distance of 130.861. 13 Thence North 82 Degrees 14105" East a distance of 111.021. 14 Thence South 71 Degrees 33154" East a distance of 110.681. 15 Thence South 20 Degrees 11139" East a distance of 92.701. 16 Thence South 00 Degrees 58116" West a distance of 118.021. 17 Thence South 17 Degrees 44141" West a distance of 131.241. lg Thence North 71 Degrees 04131" East a distance of 185.001. 10 Thence North 23 Degrees 11155" East a distance of 190.391. 20 Thence South 75 Degrees 57150" East a distance of 103.081. 21 Thence South 23 Degrees 57145" East a distance of 147.731. 22 Thence South 33 Degrees 18138" East a distance of 209.401. 23 Thence North 58 Degrees 14126" East a distance of 123.491. 24 Thence South 72 Degrees 05122" East a distance of 276.391. 25 Thence South 06 Degrees 52154" West a distance of 292.101. 26 Thence South 22 Degrees 39134" West a distance of 111.621. 27 Thence South 44 Degrees 20102" West a distance of 121.631. i 28 Thence South 16 Degrees 14120" East a distance of 107.281. ERAS J. GEERUNGS CMU CMKSEL SLM Y _ M5 10 5T EET -21- RNERVDE CALIFORNIA AO ---"IDA PAG,_ 1," OF ✓ !_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13', 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 arwntt J, GU*UNG5 CnUMT CDUHSEL start" sass ICTHMEtT "11SInt. CALIFt ni. Thence South 06 Degrees 28159" West a distance of 132.85'. Thence South 38 Degrees 13113" West a distance of 101.831. Thence South 02 Degrees 07116" East a distance of 270.191. Thence South 34 Degrees 31141" West a distance of 303.451. Thence South 29 Degrees 21128" West a distance of 91.791. Thence South it Degrees 33136" East a distance of 224.561. Thence South 04 Degrees 05108" West a distance of 140.361. Thence South 41 Degrees 11109" West a distance of 106.301. Thence South it Degrees 46106" West a distance of 122.581. Thence South 23 Degrees 11155" West a distance of 114.241. Thence South 53 Degrees 07148" West a distance of 125.001. Thence South 38 Degrees 59128" West a distance of 96.30' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 325.001. Thence Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 56 Degrees 17'56" a distance of 319.351. Thence tangent to said curve North 84 Degrees 42136" West a distance of 97.261. Thence South 78 Degrees 53113" West a distance of 130.45' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 75.001. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 128 Degrees 19141" a distance of 167.981. Thence tangent to said curve South 49 Degrees 26128" East a distance of 137.31'. Thence South 86 Degrees 33109" East a distance of 83.151. Thence South 31 Degrees 13135" West a distance of 187.111. Thence North 82 Degrees 14105" East a distance of 111.021. Thence South 36 Degrees 42110" West a distance of 205.801. Thence South 78 Degrees 15157" West a distance of 255.34 to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly and having a radius of 30.00'. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 142 -22- AGENDA ITEM. N0 -3L Pf:r_c `II OF 5 l x t C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gt*U 4 GEERUNGS COUNTY CO NSEL SURF 300 3"S IO STREET WARSIDE CALIEORww. Degrees 41'04" a distance of 74.711. Thence tangent to said curve South 64 Degrees 25107" East a distance of 223.801. Thence South 59 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 145.771. Thence South 39 Degrees 02108" East a distance of 238.171. Thence West a distance of 170.001. Thence South 25 Degrees 12104" East a distance of 187.881. Thence South 36 Degrees 52112" East a distance of 102.01' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly and having a radius of 95.00'. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 91 Degrees 46127" a distance of 152.171. Thence tangent to said curve South 54 Degrees 54115" West a distance of 128.121. Thence South 68 Degrees 27132" West a distance of 204.271. Thence South 41 Degrees 11109" West a distance of 106.301. Thence South 81 Degrees 01139" West a distance of 96.281. Thence South 03 Degrees 00146" East a distance of 95.131. Thence South 39 Degrees 59113" West a distance of 202.301. Thence South 07 Degrees 07130" East a distance of 241.871. Thence South 55 Degrees 29129" West a distance of 291.251. Thence South 77 Degrees 04126" West a distance of 120.28' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 300.001. Thence Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 65 Degrees 24153" a distance of 342.511. Thence North 65 Degrees 00100" East a distance of 125.001. Thence North 55 Degrees 00129" East a distance of 122.071. Thence North 72 Degrees 53150" East a distance of 204.021. Thence North 81 Degrees 42151" East a distance of 416.351. Thence East a distance of 50.001. Thence North 19 Degrees 39114" West a distance of 193.261. -23- AG2NDA ITEM,NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. 14 15 16 rid 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD 1. GEERURGS COUP" COUNSEL Sum " 3MS IOMSTREET RRRRSIDE. CALIEORmA Thence North 39 Degrees 48120" East a distance of 101.53'. Thence North 17 Degrees 39100" East 115.431. Thence North 32 Degrees 32130" East 124.561. Thence North 47 Degrees 24148" East a distance of 184.721. Thence South 04 Degrees 21125" West a distance of 105.301. Thence South 30 Degrees 52100" East a distance of 101.361. Thence South 47 Degrees 45122" East a distance of 145.781. Thence North 55 Degrees 26115" East a distance of 109.291. Thence South 89 Degrees 27116" East a distance of 210.011. Thence South 27 Degrees 12158" East a distance of 393.571. Thence South 33 Degrees 41124" East a distance of 108.171. Thence South 66 Degrees 48105" East a distance of 114.241. Thence South 27 Degrees 17158" East a distance of 174.431. Thence North 16 Degrees 4115711 East a distance of 104.401. Thence North 74 Degrees 4913811 East a distance of 183.391. Thence South 74 Degrees 11151" East a distance of 110.161. Thence North 10 Degrees 1811711 East a distance of 134.161. Thence South 86 Degrees 1110911 West a distance of 120.271. Thence South 76 Degrees 3310511 West a distance of 94.591. Thence North 66 Degrees 2211411 West a distance of 174.641. Thence North 43 Degrees 3410411 West a distance of 113.171. Thence North 00 Degrees 46127" West a distance of 148.011. Thence East a distance of 110.001. Thence North 73 Degrees 47128" East a distance of 83.841 to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 180.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 55 Degrees 47113" a distance of 175.261. Thence tangent to said curve North 18 Degrees 0011511 East 157.081. -24- AGENDA !7FhJ9?<O.�C�Gj� PAGE -7 II OF ✓ / W. 1 ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8i 9 10 11 12 13 14 f 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i .ERALO J GEERUNGS C"% COUNSEL sum 300 3&U IPn MEET WERSIX CALIEORNIA Thence East a distance of 130.001. Thence North 06 Degrees 37157" West a distance of 173.161. Thence North 66 Degrees 25131" West a distance of 120.021. Thence North 24 Degrees 05115" West a distance of 93.111. Thence North 40 Degrees 47141" East a distance of 96.431. Thence North 01 Degrees 28108" West a distance of 117.041. Thence North 75 Degrees 41120" East a distance of 101.141. Thence North 34 Degrees 59131" West a distance of 122.071. Thence South 87 Degrees 16125" East a distance of 210.241. Thence North 15 Degrees 51122" West a distance of 277.221. Thence North 15 Degrees 56143" West a distance of 109.201. Thence North 19 Degrees 08101" West a distance of 259.331. Thence South 87 Degrees 47151" East a distance of 130.101. Thence South 68 Degrees 11155" East a distance of 107.701. Thence South 51 Degrees 20125" East a distance of 192.091. Thence North 13 Degrees 12104" West a distance of 166.401. Thence South 80 Degrees 45152" East a distance of 124.621. Thence North 33 Degrees 10143" West a distance of 155.321. Thence North 53 Degrees 15109" East a distance of 93.601. Thence North 85 Degrees 06103" East a distance of 140.511. Thence South 72 Degrees 53150" East a distance of 136.021. Thence North 76 Degrees 51110" East a distance of 140.691. Thence North 80 Degrees 52111" West a distance of 113.441. Thence North 52 Degrees 07130" West a distance of 114.021. Thence North 76 Degrees 45134" West a distance of 174.641. Thence South 86 Degrees 03117" West a distance of 145.341. Thence North 40 Degrees 54152" East a distance of 99.251. Thence North 50 Degrees 11140" East a distance of 195.261. -25- PAGE Y OF—L— PAG_- ` J' ] Thence North 03 Degrees 10147" East a distance of 90.14'. 2 Thence North 48 Degrees 07120" East a distance of 194.740. 3 Thence South 79 Degrees 02145" East a distance of 157.881. 4 Thence North 14 Degrees 51101" West a distance of 136.561. 5 Thence North 83 Degrees 22145" East a distance of 112.751. 6 Thence North 25 Degrees 10125" West a distance of 110.491. 7 Thence North 36 Degrees 28109" West a distance of 143.001. 8 Thence North 57 Degrees 59141" East a distance of 94.341. 9 Thence North 29 Degrees 03117" East a distance of 102.961. r 10 Thence North 59 Degrees 02110" West a distance of 87.461. 11 Thence North 01 Degrees 47124" East a distance of 160.08'. 12 Thence North 14 Degrees 11137" West a distance of 265.091. 13 Thence North 22 Degrees 55156" West a distance of 141.161. 14 Thence North 03 Degrees 24123t1 West a distance of 168.301. 15 Thence South 67 Degrees 54146" East a distance of 372.321. 16 Thence South 80 Degrees 13103" East a distance of 176.571. 17 Thence South 42 Degrees 17114" East a distance of 283.871. 18 Thence South 41 Degrees 4911311 West a distance of 127.481. 19 Thence South 30 Degrees 22145" West a distance of 168.081. 20 Thence South 65 Degrees 39132" West a distance of 230.491. 21 Thence South 79 Degrees 27158" East a distance of 246.151. 22 Thence South 20 Degrees 28120" East a distance of 80.061. 23 Thence South 27 Degrees 00146" West a distance of 286.231. 24 Thence South 11 Degrees 53119" West a distance of 194.161. 25 Thence South 03 Degrees 21159" East a distance of 170.291. 26 Thence South 28 Degrees 2613411 East a distance of 272.951. 27 Thence South 05 Degrees 48124" East a distance of 296.521. 28 Thence South 39 Degrees 28121" East a distance of 110.111. GEVAM1. GEEMLI S . COU14V COVMSEL SUITE 300 X75 Immut -26- MVULUM.CI FO MA PAG_- ` J' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 10 11 12 13 14 15'. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 j 27 28 QRND 3. GEERU"OS COON COV SEL SURE" 2535 10Th STREET FMRSME. CALMMNI. Thence South 71 Degrees 33054" East a distance of 94.871. Thence South 04 Degrees 23055" East a distance of 130.380. Thence South 21 Degrees 20113" East a distance of 343.550. Thence North 43 Degrees 31152" East a distance of 137.930. Thence South 62 Degrees 14129" East a distance of 107.350. Thence South 14 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 144.311. Thence South 26 Degrees 33054" East a distance of 122.980. Thence North 19 Degrees 39014" East a distance of 222.991. Thence South 80 Degrees 32116" East a distance of 91.241. Thence South 23 Degrees 52006" East a distance of 123.571. Thence North 49 Degrees 23155" East a distance of 92.200. Thence South 85 Degrees 06003" East a distance of 140.510. Thence South 02 Degrees 4313511 West a distance of 105.121. Thence North 59 Degrees 32004" East a distance of 98.621. Thence South 56 Degrees 1803611 East a distance of 90.141. Thence North 87 Degrees 4213411 East a distance of 125.100. Thence North 80 Degrees 04026" East a distance of 203.040. Thence North 74 Degrees 2102811 East a distance of 129.810. Thence South 33 Degrees 16130" East a distance of 191.381. Thence South 31 Degrees 25047" West a distance of 105.481. Thence South 08 Degrees 52051" West a distance of 129.551. Thence North 73 Degrees 18003" East a distance of 167.040. Thence South 01 Degrees 35128" East a distance of 180.070. Thence South 17 Degrees 01014" West a distance of 102.491. Thence South 80 Degrees 44139" East a distance of 136.781. Thence South 19 Degrees 42151" West a distance of 127.471. Thence South 61 Degrees 36025" West a distance of 252.361. Thence North 79 Degrees 37127" East a distance of 228.720 to the -27- AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 'CRALO+ GEERUNG5 CoLM COUNSEL SVRE 300 3535 IOTN STREET RN RS E CALJF R A beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 80.00'. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 117 Degrees 37157" a distance of 164.251. Thence tangent to said curve South 17 Degrees 15124" West a distance of 113.901. Thence North 67 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 128.161. Thence South 11 Degrees 46106" West a distance of 122.581. Thence South 72 Degrees 38146" West a distance of 167.631. Thence South 67 Degrees 53126" East a distance of 172.701. Thence South 21 Degrees 02115" East a distance of 139.281. Thence South 46 Degrees 50151" West a distance of 109.661. Thence South 69 Degrees 08144" East a distance of 112.361. Thence North 38 Degrees 17125" East a distance of 242.071. Thence South 43 Degrees 5213611 East a distance of 180.351. Thence North 41 Degrees 5911411 East a distance of 134.541. Thence South 49 Degrees 14111i1 East a distance of 191.441. Thence South 03 Degrees 41129i1 West a distance of 155.321. Thence South 26 Degrees 3315411 West a distance of 111.801. Thence South 03 Degrees 34135i1 East a distance of 160.311. Thence North 50 Degrees 37151" East a distance of 252.241. Thence South 74 Degrees 03117t1 East a distance of 109.201. Thence North 27 Degrees 33110t1 East a distance of 103.771. Thence North 32 Degrees 4410711 West a distance of 199.721. Thence North 26 Degrees 3315411 East a distance of 100.621. Thence North 88 Degrees 21148" East a distance of 105.041. Thence North 72 Degrees 04156" East a distance of 315.291. Thence South 60 Degrees 15118" East a distance of 161.251. Thence East a distance of 72.001. Thence South 20 Degrees 15157" East a distance of 138.581. -28- AGENDA I : EW N3. PAGE i_ r 1 Thence South 33 Degrees 10143" West a distance of 155.32'. 2 Thence North 87 Degrees 36151" East a distance of 120.101. 3 Thence South 05 Degrees 54122" West a distance of 145.77'. 4 Thence South 30 Degrees 15'23" West a distance of 138.921. 5 Thence South 04 Degrees 45149" East a distance of 120.421. 6 Thence South 15 Degrees 25120" West a distance of 150.421. 7 Thence South a distance of 235.001. g Thence South 06 Degrees 34155" East a distance of 130.861. 9 Thence South 08 Degrees 58121" West a distance of 192.351. 10 Thence South 51 Degrees 48133" East a distance of 95.431. 11 Thence South 28 Degrees 47112" West a distance of 103.831. 12 Thence South 14 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 103.081. 13 Thence South 05 Degrees 11140" West a distance of 165.681. 14 Thence South 22 Degrees 50101" East a distance of 103.081. 15 Thence South 61 Degrees 11'21" West a distance of 114.131. ` 16 Thence South 71 Degrees 33154" East a distance of 126.491. 17 Thence South 05 Degrees 26125" East a distance of 105.481. 18 Thence South 46 Degrees 32154" East a distance of 130.861. 19 Thence South 41 Degrees 20152" East a distance of 133.211. 20 Thence South 50 Degrees 49115" East a distance of 292.841. 21 Thence South 10 Degrees 00129" East a distance of 86.311. 22 Thence South 45 Degrees 00100" East a distance of 205.061. 23 Thence South a distance of 130.001. 24 Thence North 86 Degrees 25125" East a distance of 320.621. 25 Thence South 60 Degrees 01106" East a distance of 150.081. 26 Thence South 24 Degrees 26138" East a distance of 120.831. 27 Thence South 49 Degrees 41109" East a distance of 216.391. 28 Thence North 55 Degrees 42147" East a distance of 266.271. cctiun � Ds Cf)VnTY COUxSEt Cw-SE SLM J 3535 1m 5s. EE* —29— RMASIDE CALJFO Nj^ AGENDAfi'= "("P—I�j FAC- 1J-- 6F /1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "RM J. GEERUNGS -MU CO NSEI %MI KIS IMMMEET RNER&DE. CAUEGRNu Thence North 62 Degrees 02056" East a distance of 277.351. Thence North 72 Degrees 21100" East a distance of 230.870. Thence North 59 Degrees 0211011 East a distance of 204.081. Thence North 77 Degrees 00119" East a distance of 133.421. Thence North 47 Degrees 07116" East a distance of 95.521. Thence North 24 Degrees 13140" East a distance of 109.661. Thence North 43 Degrees 09109" East a distance of 219.321. Thence North 55 Degrees 00129" East a distance of 122.071. Thence North 49 Degrees 11106" West a distance of 145.341. Thence North 68 Degrees 37146" East a distance of 123.491. Thence North 82 Degrees 41139" East a distance of 196.601. Thence South 63 Degrees 2610611 East a distance of 212.431. Thence South 49 Degrees 23155t1 East a distance of 92.201. Thence South 71 Degrees 5010211 East a distance of 336.791. Thence South 43 Degrees 15151" East a distance of 233.451. Thence South 47 Degrees 01117" East a distance of 300.711. Thence South 42 Degrees 11104" East a distance of 215.931. Thence South 48 Degrees 5311611 East a distance of 365.001. Thence South 47 Degrees 47'51" East a distance of 280.001. Thence South 71 Degrees 42159" East a distance of 500.001 to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 2500.00'. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 17 Degrees 3115111 to a point on the East boundary line of The Pauba Rancho. Thence Southwesterly along said rancho boundary line to the most Southeasterly corner thereof. Thence Westerly along said rancho boundary line to the Northwest corner of Section 24, Township 8 South, Range 1 West. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 24 to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 24 to the -30- AGENDA ITEM NO. C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cERMn i. GEERURDS COU COUNSEL SUITE 700 7575 IOTM STREET OVERSIDE CALIFOW. Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Section 30, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 30 and the South line of Section 29, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of Section 33, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Southwest corner thereof. Said corner also being a point in the Southerly boundary line of the County of Riverside, California. Thence Easterly along said Southerly boundary line to its intersection with the East line of Section 35, Township 8 South, Range 1 East. Thence Northerly along the East line of said Section 35 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 35 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of Sections 27 and 22, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the West 1/2 and the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Section 14, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of said Section 14 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 14 and the North line of Section 15, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 15 and the West line of Section 22, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of Sections 28 and 29, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of Section 19, Township 8 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 19 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of Section 13, Township 8 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 13 to its -31- AGENDA iTEi2�t PAGE OF62 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11', 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GrRA 1 GEERUNGS CE%1MV COUNSEL KM 3M 335 I M STREET Rl MIDE CuIFORNLI intersection with the Easterly boundary line of the Pauba Rancho. Thence Southwesterly along said rancho boundary line a distance of 3800.001. Thence leaving said rancho boundary line South 77 Degrees 12123" West a distance of 1542.24' to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 600.001. A radial line bears North 03 Degrees 16145" East. Thence Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 35 Degrees 39'40" a distance of 373.44'. Thence leaving said curve North 33 Degrees 45120" East a distance of 484.241. Thence North 47 Degrees 46103" East a distance of 700.841. Thence North 54 Degrees 32156" East a distance of 152.891. Thence North 82 Degrees 13156" East a distance of 187.361. Thence North 87 Degrees 54105" East a distance of 390.531. Thence North 78 Degrees 01153" East a distance of 201.311. Thence South 80 Degrees 36113" East a distance of 353.91' to a point on the Easterly boundary line of The Pauba Rancho. Thence along said rancho boundary line North 13 Degrees 35132" East a distance of 224.851. Thence North 80 Degrees 21104" West a distance of 630.441. Thence South 87 Degrees 33113" West a distance of 511.461. Thence South 72 Degrees 43111" West a distance of 184.781. Thence South 59 Degrees 31131" West a distance of 429.171. Thence South 67 Degrees 09137" West a distance of 577.071. Thence South 29 Degrees 09159" West a distance of 480.001. Thence South 46 Degrees 38112" West a distance of 123.791. Thence North 85 Degrees 01149" West a distance of 230.871. Thence North 55 Degrees 48150" West a distance of 120.001. Thence North 19 Degrees 42153" East a distance of 191.371. Thence North 39 Degrees 18141" East a distance of 406.861. Thence North 41 Degrees 53128" East a distance of 609.711. -32- RGenCIa ITEM Sao. IL ���jjj15-0 P t.GC � oF C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD J GEERLINGS COUNTVCOUNSEL SURE Y _ 3535 IO SHEET RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA Thence North 37 Degrees 14126" East a distance of 60.83'. Thence North 52 Degrees 27124" West a distance of 80.09'. Thence South 60 Degrees 33110" West a distance of 553.621. Thence South 37 Degrees 53143" West a distance of 800.00'. Thence South 54 Degrees 41120" West a distance of 147.051. Thence West a distance of 160.001. Thence South 78 Degrees 31105" West a distance of 326.531. Thence South 72 Degrees 33110" West a distance of 183.441. Thence North 59 Degrees 32104" West a distance of 98.621. Thence South 80 Degrees 32116" West a distance of 121.661. Thence North 78 Degrees 13154" West a distance of 122.581. Thence North 60 Degrees 15118" West a distance of 161.251. Thence North 34 Degrees 17113" West a distance of 133.141. Thence North 12 Degrees 05141" East a distance of 143.181. Thence North 79 Degrees 00141" West a distance of 104.921. Thence North 11 Degrees 18136" West a distance of 112.181. Thence North 21 Degrees 48105" West a distance of 107.701. Thence North 08 Degrees 07148" West a distance of 282.841. Thence North 70 Degrees 33136" East a distance of 90.141. Thence North 49 Degrees 45149" West a distance of 170.291. Thence North 15 Degrees 22135" West a distance of 207.421. Thence North 51 Degrees 50134" East a distance of 178.041. Thence South 58 Degrees 23113" East a distance of 152.641. Thence South 85 Degrees 36105" East a distance of 130.381. Thence North 45 Degrees 00100" West a distance of 169.711. Thence North 40 Degrees 36105" East a distance of 92.201. Thence North 59 Degrees 20157" West a distance of 156.921. Thence South 83 Degrees 39135" East a distance of 90.551. -33- AGS" D 17E1A N0. �j F F :- OF -s!_.1- C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GER EJ GEERUNGS COM CWNSEL $m 3w 3575 1 M STREET M ERSM CALMORNIA Thence North 70 Degrees 20146" West a distance of 148.661. Thence South 34 Degrees 22'49" West a distance of 115.114. Thence South 54 Degrees 09144" West a distance of 111.020. Thence North 69 Degrees 08144" West a distance of 112.361. Thence North 39 Degrees 24103" East a distance of 362.351. Thence South 70 Degrees 01101" West a distance of 117.051. Thence South 54 Degrees 14146" West a distance of 154.031. Thence North 34 Degrees 59131" West a distance of 122.071. Thence North 09 Degrees 39136' East a distance of 238.381. Thence North 77 Degrees 351330 East a distance of 255.981. Thence North 35 Degrees 32116" West a distance of 86.021. Thence North 55 Degrees 42147" East a distance of 266.271. Thence North 87 Degrees 08'15" East a distance of 200.251. Thence North 63 Degrees 26106" East a distance of 223.611. Thence South 86 Degrees 59114" West a distance of 190.261. Thence North 74 Degrees 28133" West a distance of 280.221. Thence North 11 Degrees 53119" West a distance of 97.081. Thence South 15 Degrees 49109" West a distance of 187.091. Thence South 67 Degrees 22148" West 130.001. Thence South 61 Degrees 23122" West a distance of 125.301. Thence North 06 Degrees 06156" East a distance of 140.801. Thence North 07 Degrees 07130" West a distance of 120.931. Thence South 29 Degrees 03117" West a distance of 102.961. Thence South 68 Degrees 11155" West a distance of 107.701. Thence North 20 Degrees 00115" East a distance of 149.031. Thence North 13 Degrees 11126" East a distance of 328.671. Thence North 00 Degrees 40156" West a distance of 420.001. Thence North 50 Degrees 42138" West a distance of 142.131. -34- AGEri1H ITEM NO -3--L F:; - 5�q QFC a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 2I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEMLD! GEE11u"GS C(RMTY CDVMSEL Sl/RE 700 ]575 RIECVEPSID[. ALWO..LIFOPFIA Thence North 22 Degrees 50'01" West a distance of 103.081. Thence North 43 Degrees 01130" West a distance of 102.59'. Thence North 21 Degrees 48105" West a distance of 107.701. Thence North 47 Degrees 36109" West a distance of 155.721. Thence North 77 Degrees 28116" West a distance of 58.37' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 125.001. Thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 90 Degrees 27'57" a distance of 197.37'. Thence tangent to said curve North 12 Degrees 59'41" East a distance of 74.101. Thence North 85 Degrees 14110" East a distance of 120.421. Thence South 79 Degrees 06152" East a distance of 132.381. Thence East a distance of 120.001. Thence North 77 Degrees 28116" East a distance of 507.701. Thence South 88 Degrees 05127" East a distance of 300.171, Thence South 51 Degrees 20125" East a distance of 96.051. Thence North 81 Degrees 24159" East a distance of 268.001. Thence North 52 Degrees 07130" West a distance of 171.031. Thence North 31 Degrees 15149" East a distance of 163.781. Thence North 52 Degrees 48155" East a distance of 182.001. Thence North 41 Degrees 49113" East a distance of 127.481. Thence North 27 Degrees 17159" East a distance of 174.431. Thence North 43 Degrees 36110" East a distance of 145.001. Thence North 72 Degrees 07'17" East a distance of 162.861. Thence North 51 Degrees 50134" West a distance of 89.021. Thence North 05 Degrees 11140" East a distance of 110.451. Thence North 15 Degrees 04107" East a distance of 134.631. Thence North 72 Degrees 28128" East a distance of 99.621. Thence North 54 Degrees 27144" West a distance of 86.021. -35- &—OF N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CEVA J GEERINGS C"% COUNSEL Rm " ]S7zC" STREET RrvERs1oE. uuvoRm, Thence North it Degrees 00113" West a distance of 183.371. Thence North 79 Degrees 54129" East a distance of 228.541. Thence South 68 Degrees 33108" East a distance of 150.421. Thence North 03 Degrees 56143" East a distance of 145.341. Thence North 56 Degrees 18136" East a distance of 144.221. Thence South 37 Degrees 18114" East a distance of 132.001. Thence South 46 Degrees 07124" East a distance of 180.351. Thence South 47 Degrees 38133" East a distance of 230.051. Thence North 03 Degrees 21159" East a distance of 85.151. Thence North 17 Degrees 21114" East a distance of 83.821. Thence North 22 Degrees 46157" West a distance of 271.151. Thence North 61 Degrees 41157" East a distance of 147.651. Thence South 21 Degrees 58128" East a distance of 196.17' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 120.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 85 Degrees 37105" a distance of 179.321. Thence tangent to said curve North 72 Degrees 2412711 East a distance of 103.901. Thence North 56 Degrees 18136" East a distance of 90.141. Thence South 58 Degrees 40117" East a distance of 134.631. Thence South 39 Degrees 17122" East a distance of 142.131. Thence North 10 Degrees 0712911 East a distance of 142.211. Thence North 08 Degrees 21157" West a distance of 171.831. Thence North 36 Degrees 1511411 West a distance of 186.011. Thence North 59 Degrees 32104" East a distance of 98.621. Thence North 82 Degrees 0513411 East a distance of 181.731. Thence North 65 Degrees 43132" East a distance of 279.731. Thence North 46 Degrees 23150" East a distance of 145.001. Thence North 35 Degrees 50116" East a distance of 111.021. -36- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GER I J. GEERUNGS C(1V CWNSEE SU7E JW 35M IQ STREET %MASIDE CAEIFD NA Thence North 59 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 204.081. Thence North 35 Degrees 45'14" East a distance of 154.031. Thence North 55 Degrees 55122" East a distance of 205.241. Thence North 75 Degrees 46126" East a distance of 366.231. Thence North 68 Degrees 11155" East a distance of 188.481. Thence North 74 Degrees 57144" East a distance of 346.881. Thence North 66 Degrees 15'02" East a distance of 136.571. Thence North 30 Degrees 34145" East a distance of 127.771. Thence North 11 Degrees 58134" West a distance of 168.671. Thence South 60 Degrees 38132" East a distance of 91.791. Thence South 34 Degrees 59131" East a distance of 122.071. Thence South 41 Degrees 38101" East a distance of 120.421. Thence North 12 Degrees 31144" West a distance of 92.201. Thence South 81 Degrees 28109" East a distance of 101.121. Thence North 67 Degrees 50101" West a distance of 145.771. Thence South 75 Degrees 59145" East a distance of 915.00' to a point on the Easterly boundary line of The Pauba Rancho. Thence along said rancho boundary line North 13 Degrees 35132" East a distance of 655.261. Thence leaving said rancho boundary line North 44 Degrees 20136" West a distance of 114.98' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly and having a radius of 150.00'. Thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 105 Degrees 00100" a distance of 274.891. Thence tangent from said curve North 60 Degrees 39'24" East a distance of 150.000. Thence North 06 Degrees 50136" West a distance of 92.391. Thence North 74 Degrees 20136" West a distance of 300.001. Thence North 70 Degrees 45143" West a distance of 491.691. Thence North 48 Degrees 04102" West a distance of 505.791. Thence North 18 Degrees 21147" East a distance of 458.891. -37- F;'. Oc �! e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 wun 1. GEERUNGS CC)U1 COUNSEL SURE 300 3535. 10tH ST M RNERSIDE. CALIFORNIA Thence South 87 Degrees 10109" West a distance of 1250.40'. Thence South 08 Degrees 12101" West a distance of 385.081. Thence South 27 Degrees 12107" East a distance of 223.451. Thence South 13 Degrees 42118" West a distance of 120.011. Thence South 77 Degrees 25151" West a distance of 631.861. Thence North 45 Degrees 05145" West a distance of 178.801. Thence North 23 Degrees 39102" West a distance of 724.701. Thence North 34 Degrees 49103" West a distance of 211.871. Thence North 62 Degrees 41117" West a distance of 254.811. Thence North 86 Degrees 37115" West a distance of 334.801. Thence South 66 Degrees 05148" West a distance of 261.741. Thence South 67 Degrees 10'15" West a distance of 293.591. Thence South 85 Degrees 01136" West a distance of 375.771. Thence North 85 Degrees 49114" West a distance of 446.341. Thence North 57 Degrees 51127" West a distance of 292.381. Thence North 29 Degrees 42126" West a distance of 214.871. Thence North 07 Degrees 53117" East a distance of 210.391. Thence North 35 Degrees 38142" East a distance of 394.071. Thence North 86 Degrees 55106" West a distance of 417.691. Thence South 43 Degrees 16141" West a distance of 211.991. Thence South 15 Degrees 17149" West a distance of 573.111. Thence South 41 Degrees 4910211 West a distance of 255.561. Thence South 38 Degrees 27'42!1 East a distance of 391.471. Thence South 13 Degrees 21105" East a distance of 767.661. Thence South 14 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 176.87' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 140.001. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 39 Degrees 14114" a distance of 95.881. Thence tangent to said curve South 25 Degrees 12104" West a -38- AGci tOk !1 EFr P J./�!!GG'j� PAGE OFA r_ 1_ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12' 13 14 151 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD I. QEREIRDS C(R/ C"SEI SURE ]00 EIS 10? 5EREET MVERSIDE UILIFDRNu distance of 17.44' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northerly and having a radius of 50.00'. Thence Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 134 Degrees 56137" a distance of 117.761. Thence tangent to said curve North 19 Degrees 51119" West a distance of 70.84'. Thence West a distance of 80.001. Thence South a distance of 130.001. Thence North 70 Degrees 01101" West a distance of 117.051. Thence South 22 Degrees 14156" West a distance of 118.851. Thence South 62 Degrees 06110" East a distance of 96.181. Thence South 16 Degrees 18150" West a distance of 213.601. Thence South 72 Degrees 28128" West a distance of 99.621. Thence North 48 Degrees 48151" West a distance of 106.301. Thence South 41 Degrees 11109" West a distance of 159.451. Thence North 23 Degrees 57145" West a distance of 98.491. Thence South 71 Degrees 33154" West a distance of 94.871. Thence North 53 36156" West a distance of 118.001. Thence North 23 Degrees 25143" East a distance of 163.481. Thence North 06 Degrees 20125" West a distance of 90.551. Thence North 23 Degrees 11155" East a distance of 76.161. Thence South 48 Degrees 48151" West a distance of 106.301. Thence South 33 Degrees 41124" West a distance of 108.171. Thence South 48 Degrees 10147" West a distance of 127.481. Thence North 12 Degrees 31144" West a distance of 138.291. Thence South 82 Degrees 24119" West a distance of 75.661. Thence North 11 Degrees 18136" West a distance of 50.991. Thence North 71 Degrees 33154" West a distance of 63.251. Thence North 08 Degrees 07148" West a distance of 70.711. Thence South 75 Degrees 04107" West a distance of 155.241. -39- i1e A i ^(.'� t-10 PF. .14 OF d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WRAM J. GEERUNGS COUNTY COUNSEL Sl1RE 300 ISM I0 STREET 'MIRSME CALIF( -,. Thence North 81 Degrees 52'12" West a distance of 106.07'. Thence South 34 Degrees 41143" West a distance of 79.061. Thence South 69 Degrees 26138" West a distance of 128.0161. Thence North 80 Degrees 32116" West a distance of 91.241. Thence South 63 Degrees 26106" West a distance of 67.081. Thence North 33 Degrees 41124" West a distance of 72.111. Thence West a distance of 130.001. Thence North 18 Degrees 26106" East a distance of 73.99' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 150.001. Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 58 Degrees 34113" a distance of 153.341. Thence tangent to said curve North 77 Degrees 00119" East a distance of 182.701. Thence North 40 Degrees 36105" East a distance of 92.201. Thence North 66 Degrees 02115" West a distance of 98.491. Thence North 29 Degrees 21128" West a distance of 91.791. Thence North 77 Degrees 54119" West a distance of 71.591. Thence South 62 Degrees 21114" West a distance of 118.531. Thence North 02 Degrees 12109" East a distance of 130.101. Thence North 17 Degrees 39100" West a distance of 115.431. Thence North a distance of 85.001. Thence South 62 Degrees 06110" West a distance of 96.181. Thence South 16 Degrees 59127" West a distance of 188.221. Thence South 36 Degrees 01139" West a distance of 136.021. Thence South 15 Degrees 56143" West a distance of 145.601. Thence South 37 Degrees 34107" West a distance of 82.011. Thence South 18 Degrees 26106" West a distance of 79.061. Thence North 83 Degrees 36135" West a distance of 135.831. Thence South 62 Degrees 06110" West a distance of 96.181. -40- AGENDA ITEM.. NO. 35 c."- �✓ Or �% • I Thence North 26 Degrees 33154" West a distance of 78.261. 2 Thence North 38 Degrees 59228" East a distance of 135.091. 3 Thence North 54 Degrees 46157" East a distance of 104.041. 4 Thence North 20 Degrees 19'23" East a distance of 143.961. 5 Thence North 05 Degrees 21221" East a distance of 321.401. 6 Thence South 31 Degrees 49'39" West a distance of 170.661. 7 Thence South 12 Degrees 31034" West a distance of 92.201. g Thence South 40 Degrees 06903" West a distance of 124.201. 9 Thence South 76 Degrees 36127" West a distance of 107.94. 10 Thence South 55 Degrees 29129" West a distance of 97.081. 11 Thence South 19 Degrees 39114" West a distance of 74.331. 12 Thence North 82 Degrees 52130" West a distance of 80.621. 13 Thence South 12 Degrees 05141" West a distance of 143.181. 14 Thence South 86 Degrees 43146" West a distance of 175.291. 15 Thence South 46 Degrees 16123" West a distance of 159.14'. 16 Thence West a distance of 70.001. 17 Thence North 42 Degrees 16125" West a distance of 74.331. 18 Thence North a distance of 105.001. 19 Thence North 78 Degrees 01126" West a distance of 168.671. 20 Thence North 56 Degrees 18136" West a distance of 126.101. 21 Thence North 60 Degrees 15118" East a distance of 120.931. 22 Thence South 87 Degrees 30037" East a distance of 115.111. 23 Thence North 60 Degrees 38132" East a distance of 183.581. 24 Thence North 73 Degrees 00133" East a distance of 188.221. 25 Thence North 76 Degrees 45134" Nest a distance of 174.641. 26 Thence North 01 Degrees 38112" West a distance of 175.071. 27 Thence North 08 Degrees 31051" West a distance .of 303.61. 28 Thence South 39 Degrees 48120" West a distance of 78.101. `. eCow r. COLT's +es Cowry co{A+scl wrt300 S acu i , CN-WOMA —41— • aNuscc. casae,. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4'. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ecRAMi.OEER/NGS CCXWrYC"SEI suTc Soo au 10THSTREET MusmE-Cw FMMA Thence South 05 Degrees 26125" East a distance of 105.481. Thence South 15 Degrees 38132" West a distance of 129.811. Thence South 03 Degrees 34135" West a distance of 80.161. Thence South 31 Degrees 25147" West a distance of 105.481. Thence North 43 Degrees 09109" West a distance of 109.661. Thence South 25 Degrees 27148" West a distance of 116.301. Thence North 59 Degrees 44137" West a distance of 138.921. Thence North 80 Degrees 04126" West a distance of 203.041. Thence South 51 Degrees 20125" West a distance of 96.051. Thence South 20 Degrees 33122" West a distance of 85.441. Thence South 82 Degrees 38151" West a distance of 312.571. Thence South 57 Degrees 22151" West a distance of 148.411. Thence North 29 Degrees 14156" East a distance of 143.271. Thence North 10 Degrees 26115" East a distance of 193.201. Thence South 41 Degrees 25125" West a distance of 113.361. Thence South 33 Degrees 01126" West a distance of 119.271. Thence South 83 Degrees 17125" West a distance of 171.171. Thence North 40 Degrees 21152" West a distance of 131.241. Thence North 04 Degrees 34110" East a distance of 125.451. Thence North 07 Degrees 35145" West a distance of 75.611. Thence North 36 Degrees 23104" East a distance of 118.001. Thence South 71 Degrees 01147" West a distance of 169.191. Thence South 36 Degrees 52112" West a distance of 100.001. Thence North 05 Degrees 42138" East a distance of 100.501. Thence North 38 Degrees 22103" East a distance of 153.051. Thence North 31 Degrees 40132" East a distance of 276.131. Thence North a distance of 125.001. Thence North 14 Degrees 02110" East a distance of 144.311. -42- AGENDA ITEM. NO. G I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \. nuc J. ctcwrws Cou"rYCOu SEE RM 3m 36M IOMST3EET WVE&WX. CALFMR4 Thence North 45 Degrees 00100" East a distance of 141.421. Thence North 06 Degrees 50134" West a distance of 125.901. Thence South 45 Degrees 00100" West a distance of 113.141. Thence South 21 Degrees 02115" West a distance of 69.641. Thence North 75 Degrees 04107" West a distance of 77.62'. Thence North 11 Degrees 46'05" West a distance of 122.581. Thence North 27 Degrees 45131" West a distance of 107.351. Thence South 02 Degrees 07116" West a distance of 135.091. Thence South 06 Degrees 34155" West a distance of 130.861. Thence South 04 Degrees 34126" East a distance of 125.401. Thence South it Degrees 00113" West a distance of 183.371. Thence South 63 Degrees 26106" West a distance of 145.341. Thence South 38 Degrees 39135" West a distance of 96.351. Thence South 70 Degrees 42136" West a distance of 105.951. Thence South 25 Degrees 38128" West a distance of 138.651. Thence North 33 Degrees 41124" West a distance of 108.171. Thence North 09 Degrees 43139" East a distance of 177.551. Thence North 18 Degrees 26106" East a distance of 110.681. Thence North 49 Degrees 05108" West a distance of 99.251. Thence South 12 Degrees 31144" West a distance of 92.20'. Thence North 71 Degrees 33154" West a distance of 94.871. Thence South 02 Degrees 43135" East a distance of 105.121. Thence South 57 Degrees 22151" West a distance of 148.411. Thence North 59 Degrees 02110" West a distance of 87.461. Thence South 89 Degrees 07155" West a distance of 174.53' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly and having a radius of 25.00'. Thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 161 Degrees 44'04" a distance of 70.571. Thence tangent to said curve North 70 Degrees 51159" East a -43- AGE-:NDA F, Lv1, NIO.. �a:g�-. 1 2 3 4 5 6 71 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERAWJ GEERUNGS CEXM COUNSEL SUITE 30" 35X- I"TNSTREET RIVERSIDE CAILKORNIA distance of 103.820. Thence North 32 Degrees 44907" East a distance of 83.221. Thence North 10 Degrees 05151" West a distance of 74.151. Thence'North 33 Degrees 00111" East a distance of 115.661. Thence North 19 Degrees 21132" East a distance of 196.091. Thence North 23 Degrees 57145" West a distance of 98.491. Thence North 20 Degrees 51116" East a distance of 112.361. Thence South 67 Degrees 45104" West a distance of 118.851. Thence South 10 Degrees 32121" West a distance of 218.691. Thence South 87 Degrees 08115" West a distance of 100.121. Thence South 08 Degrees 44146" East a distance of 65.751. Thence South 49 Degrees 05108" West a distance of 99.251. Thence North 30 Degrees 57150" West a distance of 145.771. Thence South 14 Degrees 32104" West a distance of 139.461. Thence North 67 Degrees 50101" West a distance of 145.771. Thence South a distance of 90.001. Thence South 25 Degrees 51159" West a distance of 183.371. Thence North 54 Degrees 09144" West a distance of 111.021. Thence North 02 Degrees 56109" West a distance of 195.261. Thence North 27 Degrees 45131" East a distance of 107.351. Thence North 23 Degrees 29155" West a distance of 125.401. Thence South 20 Degrees 37148" West a distance of 454.121. Thence South 07 Degrees 18121" East a distance of 196.601. Thence North 78 Degrees 13154" West a distance of 122.581. Thence North 12 Degrees 59141" West a distance of 200.121. Thence North 08 Degrees 58121" East a distance of 192.351. Thence North a distance of 205.051. Thence North 29 Degrees 44'42" West a distance of 241.871. -44- AG�Dt0A 1-i ctv NO. FAG-- q — OF bw 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD 1. GEERu"cs CLKM CO SEL SURE 700 1515 LOTM STREET RRRRS*E CAUFMNIA Thence South 02 Degrees 17126" East a distance of 125.101. Thence South 10 Degrees 29129" East a distance of 137.300. Thence South 15 Degrees 56143" West a distance of 145.601. Thence South 33 Degrees 41124" West a distance of 108.171. Thence South 23 Degrees 57145" West a distance of 98.491. Thence South 16 Degrees 35114" West a distance of 245.20'. Thence South 68 Degrees 57145" West a distance of 139.281. Thence North a distance of 95.011. Thence South 54 Degrees 27144" West a distance of 86.021. Thence North 10 Degrees 18117" West a distance of 111.801. Thence North 02 Degrees 23109" East a distance of 120.101. Thence North 04 Degrees 23155" West a distance of 130.381. Thence North 38 Degrees 39135" West a distance of 128.061. Thence South 07 Degrees 54126" East a distance of 181.731. Thence South 16 Degrees 41157" West a distance of 156.601. Thence South 08 Degrees 31151" West a distance of 202.241. Thence South 82 Degrees 52130" West a distance of 80.621. Thence North 26 Degrees 33154" East a distance of 111.801. Thence North 05 Degrees 42138" West a distance of 100.501. Thence North 32 Degrees 37109" West a distance of 148.411. Thence North 47 Degrees 38133" West a distance of 230.051. Thence North 84 Degrees 41108" West a distance of 215.931. Thence North a distance of 90.031. Thence South 30 Degrees 34145" West a distance of 127.77'. Thence South 59 Degrees 32104" East a distance of 197.231. Thence South 12 Degrees 31144" East a distance of 92.20'. Thence South 66 Degrees 22914" East a distance of 87.321. Thence South 39 Degrees 33135" East a distance of 119.161. -45- AGENDA ITEM rip_ 3Y PAGE f 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 �RAOpACCERUNGS EO U"W C"SEL SURE 300 M8 IM STREET FARSUx CA WMMIA Thence South 26 Degrees 33'54" West a distance of 167.711. Thence South 10 Degrees 18'17" West a distance of 111.80'. Thence South 45 Degrees 00100" East a distance of 98.99'. Thence East a distance of 100.00'. Thence South 23 Degrees 57145" East a distance of 98.491. Thence South 45 Degrees 00'00" East a distance of 113.141. Thence South 41 Degrees 38101" West a distance of 120.421. Thence South 77 Degrees 28116" West a distance of 138.291. Thence South 87 Degrees 56117" West a distance of 139.091. Thence South 30 Degrees 57155" West a distance of 93.291. Thence North 82 Degrees 45120" West a distance of 118.95'. Thence South 37 Degrees 34107" West a distance of 246.021. Thence North 54 Degrees 09144" West a distance of 111.029. Thence North 86 Degrees 25'25" West a distance of 160.311. Thence South 49 Degrees 45149" West a distance of 85.151. Thence North 61 Degrees 36025" West a distance of 210.301. Thence South 84 Degrees 30128" West a distance of 261.201. Thence North 75 Degrees 57150" West a distance of 268.001. Thence South 71 Degrees 06150" West a distance of 200.811. Thence North 59 Degrees 25115" West a distance of 127.770. Thence North 45 Degrees 00100" West a distance of 212.130. Thence North 78 Degrees 41124" West a distance of 127.481. Thence North 49 Degrees 14111" West a distance of 114.871. Thence South 85 Degrees 42100" West a distance of 133.381. Thence North 86 Degrees 22101" West a distance of 315.630. Thence South 47 Degrees 36109" West a distance of 155.72'. Thence North 74 Degrees 44142" West a distance of 114.02'. Thence South 67 Degrees 22148" West a distance of 260.000. -46- AG;-zh_fiITEM NO. IC r 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ,.� 28 ARAM 1. GURUNGS CCIVNCYC"SEL ARCS" SSSSIOT"STREET wERSIx. u�rpRnu Thence North 11 Degrees 00113" West a distance of 183.371. Thence North 14 Degrees 55153" East a distance of 155.241. Thence North 67 Degrees 45104" East a distance of 118.851. Thence South 73 Degrees 29144" East a distance of 140.801. Thence North 34 Degrees 35132" West a distance of 176.141. Thence North 19 Degrees 32112" East a distance of 164.471. Thence North 75 Degrees 10125" East a distance of 175.860. Thence North 25 Degrees 16940" West a distance of 199.060. Thence North 33 Degrees 30112" East a distance of 425.730. Thence North 03 Degrees 30'50" East a distance of 571.071. Thence North 47 Degrees 02143" West a distance of 198.121. Thence South 78 Degrees 41024" West a distance of 356.930. Thence South 86 Degrees 59'14" West a distance of 380.53'. Thence South 63 Degrees 26106" West a distance of 301.871. Thence South 58 Degrees 46154" West a distance of 192.941. Thence South 39 Degrees 33135" West a distance of 149.161. Thence South 75 Degrees 15'23" West a distance of 196.471. Thence North 77 Degrees 11'45" West a distance of 225.611. Thence North 65 Degrees 53152" West a distance of 208.151. Thence North 31 Degrees 14121" West a distance of 356.72'. Thence North 25 Degrees 36156" West a distance of 809.57'. Thence North 55 Degrees 05'51" West a distance of 262.151. Thence North 82 Degrees 28103" West a distance of 244.111. Thence South 60 Degrees 10'08" West a distance of 164.849. Thence South 71 Degrees 43'56" West a distance of 542.33'. Thence South 37 Degrees 24119" West a distance of 214.011. Thence South 47 Degrees 21112" West a distance of 206.651. Thence South 34 Degrees 23122" West a distance of 545.311. -47- �Y. O L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 281 arw.o,. crEian.cs COIMNCOUX EE KM ]00 7St5� rC STAEET AVF.RSIOC. C11EiORXU Thence South 47 Degrees 29123" West a distance of 162.791. Thence North 87 Degrees 13'47" West a distance of 310.36'. Thence North 50 Degrees 11140" West a distance of 117.151. Thence North 69 Degrees 46930" West a distance of 202.481. Thence North 38 Degrees 59928" West a distance of 135.091. Thence North 23 Degrees 47135" West a distance of 240.441. Thence North 01 Degrees 38112" West a distance of 280.101. Thence North 40 Degrees 36105" East a distance of 92.201. Thence North 03 Degrees 04144" East a distance of 181.921. Thence North 54 Degrees 46157" West a distance of 1546.13' to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 1000.00'. Thence Northwesterly and Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 29 Degrees 44148" a distance of 519.181. Thence tangent to said curve North 84 Degrees 31145" West a distance of 492.72' to the Southeasterly corner of Parcel 7 of - Parcel Map 38 as recorded in Book 4, Pages 12 through 13, records of Riverside County, California. Thence Northeasterly to a turning point in the boundary line of The Pauba Rancho. Said point lies in the North 1/2 of Section 5, Township 8 South, Range 1 West. Thence leaving said boundary line on a Northeasterly bearing to a point. Said point being an intersection of the East line of Section 8, Township 7 South, Range 1 West with the Northerly boundary line of the Pauba Rancho. Thence Northerly along the East line of said Section 8 and the East line of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 5 and the North line of the East 1/2 of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 1 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of Sections 31 and 30, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of Section 19, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of said Section 19 to the -48- r�.v.- _GF�2 l- . 1 Northeast corner thereof. 2 Thence Easterly along the South line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 17, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the 3 Southeast corner thereof. 4 Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 17 to the Northeast corner thereof. 5 6 Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 8, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast corner thereof. 7 8 Thence Northerly along the East line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 8 to the Northeast corner thereof. 9 Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of 10 Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast corner thereof. 11 Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 5 to the Northeast corner thereof. 12 13 Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 6 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast corner thereof. 14 15 Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the Northeast corner thereof. 16 Thence Easterly along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33 and the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, 17 Township 5 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast corner thereof. 18 Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 34 to the Northeast corner thereof. 19 Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said 20 Section 34 and the South line of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 35, Township 5 South, Range 1 West to the Southeast 21 corner thereof. 22 Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Section 35 to the Northeast corner thereof. 23 Thence Easterly along the South line of the North 1/2 of the 24 North 1/2 of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 1 West and the South line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 31, 25 Township 5 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. 26 Thence Northerly along the East line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Section 31 to the Northeast corner thereof. 27 Thence Easterly along the South line of the South 1/2 of Section /� 28 29 and 28, Township 5 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner �MtD J. GEUW»cs EERI COUNSEL SURE 300 ]635IOTX STREET V'ERSRX. ULL1F011414 -49- e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 261 27 28 aIun,.arr..uwcs cou TV COMSEL Burt foo b>SC IOI 0mIIi aBBBO[ C11LrO11Nu thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of said Section 28 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 5 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 27 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of Section 22 and the South line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 23 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 23 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Section 23 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the East 1/2 of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the East 1/2 of said Section 15 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of Sections 30 and 3, Township 5 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the West 1/2 of said Section 3 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the East 1/2 of Section 33, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the East 1/2 of said Section 33 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 28 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said -50- pair<Df, 1«<v4 NO. _� ib 5 6 7 8 9 10 11, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 r-. 28 muco J. GURLmGS C(XWTVC0V SEL KM 300 3515 10TH SMFFT MEIIKDE, CA WOnhu Section 29 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 20 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 19 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 18 and the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 1 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of Section 11, Township 4 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 11 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 4 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 10 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 4 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 3 to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 3 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the North 1/2 of the -51- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 QeMu /. GEEIUUNGS CMWEYCOUNSEL SURE 700 7615 tOEN S711EET aL'ENADE. coo"INIA North 1/2 of Sections 2 and 1, Township 4 South, Range 1 West and the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the West 1/2 and the South line of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Section 31, Township 3 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of said Section 31 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Easterly along the South line of the East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Section 30, Township 3 South, Range 1 East to the Southeast corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of said Section 30 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 30 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the North 1/2 of Section 25 and the East line of the South 1/2 of Section 24, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 24 and the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Southerly along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 23 and the West line of the East 1/2 of Section 26 and the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Southwest corner thereof. Thence westerly along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35 and the North line of the Southeast 1/4 and the North line of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3 and the North line of Section 4, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Section 32, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 32 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of Section 30, Township 3 South, Range 1 West to the Northeast corner thereof. -52- M\ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 4 t 28 MMA D1. GEERUNGS CGGNTV C"SEE AIRF" 1575 IO SHEET •NERAGE. CKWMNiA Thence Westerly along the North line of the said Section 30 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the East 1/2 of Section 24, Township 3 South, Range 2 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the East 1/2 of said Section 24 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of Sections 13 and 12, Township 3 South, Range 2 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the West 1/2 of said Section 12 and the North line of Sections it and 10, Township 3 South, Range 2 West to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of Section 4, Township 3 South, Range 2 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 4 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of Section 32, Township 2 South, Range 2 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 32 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the North 1/2 of Section 31, Township 2 South, Range 2 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of said Section 31 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 3 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 25 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 25 to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 25 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 3 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of said -53- Fr: _ OF / E E S iC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2nw V J- GEE"G5 CCX1 C0U SEL RrtE mo MMUM ET wFllSm[. CnL.OgMA Section 23 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the North 1/2 of Section 22, Township 2 South, Range 3 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the North 1/2 of said Section 22 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of Section 16, Township 2 South, Range 3 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 16 to the Northwest corner thereof. Thence Northerly along the East line of the North 1/2 of Section 17, Township 2 South, Range 3 West to the Northeast corner thereof. Said point also being a point in the Northerly boundary line of the County of Riverside, California. Thence following said boundary line Westerly, Northerly and Westerly to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. rs I� -54- �.�_ �:.. ITE V` ?A. E. OF61 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Industrial Project 90-6; Deleo Clay Tile; a request for a 14,960 square foot addition to an existing 47,953 square foot industrial building located at the southeast corner of Collier Avenue and Chaney Street. 00 PREPARED BY:APPROVED BY: Dave Gunderman abrielle Restivo Dave Gunderman Associate Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. APPROVED BY: M ndy City Manager On August 1, 1990, Planning Commission approved a 14, 960 square foot addition to the Deleo Clay Tile manufacturing plant fronting Collier Avenue by a 4-0 vote, Commissioner Brinley absent (minutes and staff report attached.) A Variance from the Parking Ordinance was also approved enabling this current proposal. The addition is to house a new automated kiln and will not require additional employees to operate. The addition spans the majority of the remaining Collier Avenue frontage, and will screen current piles of clay, tile and loading activities. This proposal is a result of several attempts to extend/house several clay tile manufacturing activities (see Planning Commission Report - Background). The primary issue discussed regarding the proposal was the amount of parking available. The number of parking spaces currently available is twenty-eight (28) versus the eighty-three (83) spaces required under the Code. Planning Commission felt twenty-eight (28) spaces may not be enough and specified fifty-five (55) spaces to be set aside on the site plan to be used at a future time if necessary, as a Condition of Approval. Also, the Parking Determination (Variance) is to be reviewed on an annual basis. Conditions Nos. 38 and 40 were deleted due to inapplicability (the strip of land (public right-of-way) contiguous to Collier Avenue is owned by the City and not applicant. Conditions were added by Planning Commission to require twenty-four (24) inch box street trees, to incorporate Conditions of Approval 87-1 and 87-3 where applicable and to require bonding for future improvements. RECOMMENDATION It is recommend City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-29 and approval of Industrial Project 90-6 based on the Findings and subiect to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. Subject to the attached conditions of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental AGENDA ITEM N0. PACE I OF 29 Page 2 August 28, 1990 Subject: Industrial Project 90-6; Deleo Clay Tile impacts. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the Limited Manufacturing Zoning District. 3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. AGENDA iTEkt NJ.� liq PAGE 7 OF i LI r r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 AND PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 Planning Division 1. Approval of Industrial Project 90-6 is contingent upon the approval of Parking Determination 90-1. Parking Determination 90-1 must be reviewed one (1) year from the anniversary date of the release of Certificate of Occupancy for Industrial Project 90-6. 2. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued within one (1) year. An extension of time up to one (1) year per extension, may be granted by the Planning Commission prior to the expiration of the initial design review approval upon application by the developer one (1) month prior to expiration. 3. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 4. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plan and/or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. Materials and colors shall be as shown on exhibits stamped approved in case file. a) All existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. b) Loading zones shall be striped on-site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 5. All required off-site improvements, including street lighting, shall be completed in accordance with improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 7. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire protection or alternative requirements as modified in writing by the Fire Marshal. 8. All undeveloped and/or construction areas associated with the site shall be maintained in a safe and neat manner at all times. 9. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be contained in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code using best construction practices. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken within 30 days after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building Official. 10. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 11. Trash enclosure shall be constructed per City Standards, and provide for two (2) trash bins subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. AGENDA ITEM NO. sir I._ PAGE 0F�1_ r Cd CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 AND PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 CONTINUED 12. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of fixture. No wall pack units shall be permitted. 13. A final grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the Chief Building Official. 14. The project shall connect to sewer. 15. All outdoor ground mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and screened architecturally with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 16. A minimum six-foot (61) high decorative block wall shall be installed along the eastern property line and continuing along the Collier property line. Said wall to connect to the wall adjacent to the Minthorn parking facilities constructed as a Condition of Approval of Industrial Project 87-1. 17. All signs shall be by City permit only. 18. Applicant shall submit a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan, which shall place Eucalyptus Trees further from buildings. Revised plan should enhance the decorative screening wall and all existing and new metal building facades visible from public right-of-way. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect. The plan shall be approved prior to the Certificate of Occupancy and the release of utilities. 19. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for 100% of the City Consultant costs and 20% consultant cost for Planning Department processing. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and at least 24 inch box in size, as approved by the Community Development Director. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (611) high and six-inch (611) wide concrete curb. d) Planting within fifteen feet (151) of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). e) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. f) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. g) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits applicant to complete cleanup of the project site and vacant property west of Minthorn Street removing all unusable equipment and debris. No outdoor storage shall be allowed on vacant property south or west of the site without Planning Commission and City Council approval in accordance with the restrictions, provisions and requirements of the Municipal Code. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE r c CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 AND PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 CONTINUED 21. All Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 shall apply to this project. All outstanding conditions shall be fulfilled and completed prior to release of Certificate of Occupancy. 22. Applicant to meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 23. All landscape, parking and screening improvements to be bonded 120%, Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for one year. A completion bond shall be posted for all site improvements. 24. Prior to issuance of any grading permits or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 25. Meet all County Fire Department requirements including emergency vehicle turning radius and fire resistance requirements for all buildings including sprinklers where required. A letter shall be submitted verifying compliance prior to issuance of building permits. 26. This Parking Determination may be revoked when evidence of spill-over parking is evident onto adjacent vacant lots and onto Chaney, Collier and Minthorn Streets. If revoked, the original application shall be reconsidered by the Planning Commission at a fee set for a new Parking Determination application. Engineering Department 27. Construct all off-site improvements and improvements shall be delineated on street improvement plans and must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 28. Street improvement plan and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer and improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department standards and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 29. For construction of public works off-site improvements pay all fees and meet all requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.06). 30. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). 31. Sign agreement for City Landscaping and Street Lighting District (Resolution No.'s 86-26, 86-27, 86-36). 32. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owner or conveyed to a drainage easement. 33. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 34. All public work requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code). AQE_NDA ITEM, NO. �j� :� 3- _O, r r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 AND PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 CONTINUED 35. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 36. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection. 37. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 38. pessary--tiedieaationa--shall--fie--wade-�a-Ebl}3er-2rvenue-tv grevIde-for-a-88 feat-right--e€-way. -K4-f-oGt--roadwa-y}. DELETE 39. Provide corner cut-off dedication on the north and west corners of the property. 40. iev3tie--3-lieu-gaeext-€-0r-o€€-s3�-i$rpr=-_-_st��r►-LGli3�r Avexuev DELETE 41. Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 incorporated herein by reference where applicable. 42. The site plan, that is a part of the building permit plans, shall designate the dedicated future parking area. Said property can be used for storage until a determination by the Community Development Director is made that parking spaces be provided. AGENDA ITEM. NO. PAGE -L— 0F Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 8 ZONE CHANGE 90-10 CONTINUED I ith the current General Plan. These parcels are located a southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery d Lan taff Streets. Chairma Brown opened the public hearing at 8:15 p. , asking if anyone ished to speak in favor. Receiving response, Chairman Br n asked if anyoie wished to speak . opposition. Ms. Ann Armstro , 304 West Pottery Street stated that they would like to see a property remain R-2 Ms. Armstrong then commented on the su ounding uses and a problems they have incurred. Chairman Brown asked if nyon else wished to speak in opposition or on the matter. ceiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hea n at 8:17 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey co nted on formity with the General Plan, and Ms. Arms ong's commen and requested staff indicate what alter tives she has wit regard to R -2/R-3. Commissioner S hoff commented on the Zoni and General Plan designation-- grees with R-3 in this area. Motion b Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to 'ty Council adopti of Negative Declaration 90-24 and approv of Zone Chan 90-10 based on the Findings listed in the Staf eport, se nd by Commissioner Gilenson. proved 4-0 9. Parking Determination 90-1 and Industrial Project 90-6 - Deleo Clay Tile - Joe Deleo - Associate Planner Restivo presented a request to reduce the parking requirements specified in Section 17.66.030.C, and for the construction of a 12,240 square foot addition to an existing industrial building, on the southeast corner of Chaney and Collier. Associate Planner Restivo requested the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: I Condition No. 4a: All existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval; of the Community Development Director or his designee. Condition No. 4b: Loading zones shall be striped on-site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. Condition No. 38: Delete Condition No. 40: Delete Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:20 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at,8:21 p.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. �1.--- PAGE 1 OF Z� Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 9 Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 19.b., recommending that 15 gallon be changed to 24 inch box; condition number 2 of Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3, and the conditions for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 being incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this proposal, added as condition number 41. 1 Commissioner Wilsey commented on seeing the improvements to the property as outlined in Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3; parking space count --83 not I being a viable number for this type of operation, however,J 28 spaces is not enough, and prohibiting on -street parking on Chaney and Minthorn Streets. Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 21 with regard to all conditions being fulfilled and the indication that a completion bond for 1all site improvements will be required, but not included in the conditions, and this being added to condition number 23; parking space requirements and the need for flexibility --there should be some relief, but reluctant to go from 83 to 28' spaces; designating an area for 55 parking spaces as referenced on Industrial Project 87-3, if required. Chairman Brown commented on the parking space count; if the use were to change whether or'not parking can still be met; an easement being placed on the property for parking purposes, if the use should change; number of employees per shift, and enforcement. Discussion ensued on designating an area for parking, and whether or not this parking area should be kept clear of all storage; the number of parking spaces to be designated; its location, and enforcement tools available to the City. Motion by Commissioner Gilenson to approve Parking Determination 90-1 based on the Findings and recommend to City Council adoption of NegativejDeclaration 89-1 and approval of Industrial Project 90-6 based on the Findings and subject to the 40 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 4a: Condition No. 4b: Condition No. 19b: "Ali existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee." "Loading zones shall be striped on- site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee." Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and at least 24 inch box in size, as approved by the Community Development Director." AGENDAITEM NO PAGE OF Z Minutes of Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Page 10 i Condition No. 38: Delete Condition No. 40: Condition No. 41: "Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 incorporated herein by reference where applicable." Condition No. 42: "Dedicate or set aside sufficient land for an additional 55 parking spaces, location to be determined by the;Community Development Director. Said property can be used for storage until a determination by the Community Development Director is made that parking spaces shall be provided. Second by Commissioner Saathoff with discussion. i Commissioner Saathoff asked if the maker of the motion would include bonding for improvements. Chairman Brown inquired about the dedication of parking area and how this is to be recorded --what agreements? Community Development Director Gunderman suggested that the parking area be identified on the site/construction plans. i Commissioner Gilenson amended his motion to include the following amendments: Condition No. 23: Add', "A completion bond shall be posted for all site improvements." I Condition No. 42: "The site plan, that is a part of the building permit plans, shall designate the dedicated future parking area. Said property can be used for storage until a determination by the Community Development Director is made that parking spaces shall be provided." Commissioner amendment to Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 10. giggle -Family I Saathoff amended his second to include the the motion. I Residence - 359 Avenue 4 - Assistant P1 DeGa presented a request' for Minor Design Revie f a sing e - manufactured dwelling of 1,006 sq feet in size with a 4 quare foot ',garage placed o 7,250 square foot lot. The si s approximately 1 eet south of the intersection of Mill an venue 4. Chairman Brown asked if the was one present representing the applicant and if a were any c erns. Receiving no response, Chairma own asked for discuss at the table. issi Gilenson commented on condition nu 10, nding that the interior clear space be changed to " '6") for consistency. AGENDA ITEM NO. 51 PAGE --q- OFDq +r c CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GABRIELLE RESTIVO; ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 1, 1990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 AND PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 Staff is proposing the following additional Conditions of Approval to address project loading zone and elevation concerns: Condition 4.a. - "All existing and proposed elevations must be of the same color, with the addition that white trim may be used to enhance the side elevations, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. Condition 4.b. - "Loading zones shall be striped on-site in accordance with Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code and/or a truck storage area shall be delineated on the site plan providing the area specified by the aforementioned Section, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. Conditions 38 and 40 should be deleted due to the fact that the applicant does not own the property adjacent to the public right-of-way. This property is owned by the City, both right-of-way and remainder parcel. The applicant deeded this former Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way parcel to the City due to requirements of the Uniform Building Code for allowable building area increases. /cm AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE � OF 2 �/A�J PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Public Hearing Parking Determination 90-1 Industrial Project 90-6 August 1, 1990 PREPARED BY: '&APPROVED BY• Gabrielle Restivo Dave Gun an Associate Planner Comm. De Dir. OWNER/APPLICANT Deleo Clay Tile Joe Deleo 600 Chaney Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 USE Design Review of a 14,960 square foot addition to an existing industrial building and a reduction in parking requirements. SIZE AND LOCATION A 14,960 square foot addition to an existing 47,953 square foot building situated on a 5.1 acre lot, located at the southeast corner of Collier and Chaney Street. SETTING Two previous building additions, Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3, were reviewed and approved by City staff (Community Development Director). Industrial Project 87-1 was a proposal for a 1,972 square foot building addition, a sixty-eight feet (681) by twenty-nine feet (291) addition to the existing metal building on the Collier Avenue frontage (see attached). The eight Conditions of Approval were in a large part fulfilled. Industrial Project 87-3 was a proposal to add a 1,890 square foot addition to the existing metal building on the Minthorn Street frontage. The project was approved subject to seven (7) Conditions of Approval. Industrial Projects 87-1 and 87-3 Conditions of Approval were later modified into twelve (12) mutual Conditions of Approval (see attached). Although Industrial Project 87-3 was subsequently withdrawn by the AGENDA ITEMNO. ,, I PACE OF11q EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Manufacturing M-1 Limited Industrial/ Flood Way Fringe North - Industrial M-2 Flood Way Fringe East - Industrial/Storage M-1 Flood Way Fringe South - Vacant M-1 Flood Way Fringe West - Vacant C -M Commercial Manufacturing Two previous building additions, Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3, were reviewed and approved by City staff (Community Development Director). Industrial Project 87-1 was a proposal for a 1,972 square foot building addition, a sixty-eight feet (681) by twenty-nine feet (291) addition to the existing metal building on the Collier Avenue frontage (see attached). The eight Conditions of Approval were in a large part fulfilled. Industrial Project 87-3 was a proposal to add a 1,890 square foot addition to the existing metal building on the Minthorn Street frontage. The project was approved subject to seven (7) Conditions of Approval. Industrial Projects 87-1 and 87-3 Conditions of Approval were later modified into twelve (12) mutual Conditions of Approval (see attached). Although Industrial Project 87-3 was subsequently withdrawn by the AGENDA ITEMNO. ,, I PACE OF11q Public Hearing Parking Determination 90-1 Industrial Project 90-6 August 1, 1990 Page 2 applicant, improvements such as the block wall along Minthorn Street and street trees were provided. Industrial Project 89-1 and Variance 89-1 proposed the 14,960 square feet addition now proposed under Industrial Project 89-6. These applications were withdrawn due to City staff not supporting a Variance from the Parking Ordinance. Zone Change Amendment 89-3 approved on March 27, 1990, allows for a reduction in parking requirements with Planning Commission approval. The current proposal is for a reduction in the parking requirements that would normally be required for this 14,960 square feet addition and consequently the total building area of 62,913 square feet. The total number of parking spaces required by code is 83 parking spaces. The total number of improved parking spaces on site is 28. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant's stated purpose for the additional floor area is to house a new automated kiln for the manufacture of clay tile. The 4.6 net acre project site is located on the southeast corner of Collier Avenue and Chaney Street in an M-1 Zoning District, which allows industrial uses when in compliance with all the requirements of Chapter 17.56 of Title 17. ANALYSIS There are several issues of concern, these include: parking, architecture/building materials, and landscape and screening of outside storage areas. Parking The applicant submitted a concurrent Parking Determination (PD) application with this Industrial Design Review application. The purpose of the requested Parking Determination (PD) is to reduce the number of required parking spaces for this project. The total number of parking spaces required for this project per combined floor area (existing and proposed) would be eighty-three (83) spaces. The applicant states that there are twenty-eight (28) existing spaces currently provided. Staff counted the number of parked vehicles at the Deleo Clay Tile Plant on two separate occasions during the morning and afternoon hours, and found between 14 to 18 cars present. Occasionally, 1 car has been parked on Minthorn Street, in the Minthorn Street driveway, and on vacant property west of the site. The property west of the site has also been used for truck and forklift parking, and for storage of clay tile debris. Forklifts, trucks and truck beds are occasionally parked in the front parking lot as well. Staff has been informed (see attached letter) that there are approximately forty (40) employees during the day shift [thirteen (13) carpool and three (3) ride bicycles], thirteen (13) swing shift employees and seven (7) graveyard employees. The proposed addition is to house and automated kiln which the applicant states will not require any additional employees. Staff's concerns would be with obtaining a permanent location to store and load forklifts and trucks. Staff is also concerned with employee parking. While staff encourages carpooling and other forms of alternative transportation, the proposed amount of parking is one (1) space per 1.5 employees (approximately) for the morning shift. This is not an unreasonable amount in view of other City Ordinances (see attached), however, Planning Commission may AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF6" r Public Hearing Parking Determination 90-1 Industrial Project 90-6 August 1, 1990 Page 3 choose to ask for an improved parking lot elsewhere on the site in the event spill-over parking is evident in the future or as a project Condition of Approval. Staff recommends that a permanent truck storage area be delineated on the project site. Architecture/Building Materials The proposed building material for this project is metal. Although Chapter 17.38.110.0 of Title 17 states that generally, plain metal buildings are not acceptable, the proposed metal addition would be more compatible with the existing metal structure. With proper screening and enhanced landscaping, the project site could be greatly improved over the present condition of the site. The applicant proposes to change the building from blue with white trim to green with white trim. Screening of Outside Storage Areas and Landscaping As noted in the Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 (Exhibit "D"), the project has been conditioned to landscape and screen the project perimeter. As a condition of approval for this current project, the applicant would be required to complete the block wall adjacent to the Minthorn property line, as well as construct an additional block wall screen along the eastern property line and the Collier property line. Further, the applicant must meet all Conditions of Approval for the previous projects (87-1 and 87-3) prior to issuance of Building Permits for this current project. A completion bond would be required for all conditioned site improvements as well as the standard landscape improvement completion bond. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS An Initial Environmental Assessment has been prepared for this project which identifies no significant environmental impacts. A Negative Declaration has been recommended. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-1 and approval of Industrial Project 89-1 based on the Findings listed and the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS: INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-6 Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Limited Manufacturing Zoning District. 3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. AGENDA ITEMS N, O. PAGE ' jOF� r Public Hearing Parking Determination 90-1 Industrial Project 90-6 August 1, 1990 Page 4 FINDING: PARKING DETERMINATION 90-1 5. The reduced parking allowance meets the intent of the findings stated in Chapter 17.66.030.0 and will not affect public safety, health or welfare. AGENDA ITEM NO. ta PG_ JJ.e OF1�.J _— PROJECT SITE c w AREA AND VICINITY MAP 9TF z Exhibit A Vicinity Map AGElvDA ITEM NO. _ PAGE OF INOR DESIGN REVIEW CONDITIONS 2f APPROVAL E -OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 67-1 fDELEO CLAY TILE) I. Minor Design Review approval shall lapse after one (1) year. 2. All roofing materials shall be Class °A" fire retardant. 3. Applicant shall meet all applicable city Code requirements and Ordinances. 4. Addition shall be of same or similar materials as the existing structure, and the addition shall be painted the same color as the existing structure. " 5. Structure shall be constructed as depicted on approved plans or as modified by the Community Development Director. 6. Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction on site. 7. Prior to final release or occupancy of this building, plans for the following shall be submitted for review and approval and the installation of these improvements completed to the satis- faction of the Community Development Director or his designee: A. Paving and striping of parking spaces and driveway area as shown on Exhibit 1 (for a total of 23 parking spaces in front of the building). B. curb, gutter, street paving and sidewalk shall be completed along Chaney Street in front of the proposed building and concrete driveway approach and curb, gutter, sidewalk and street paving shall be completed around curb return to beginning of curve radius on Minthorn Street. " C. New driveway cut shall be -provided as shown on Exhibit 1. D. Landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted for entire Chaney Street frontage, to include street trees, foundation planting and trees to break up front elevation of recent addition, and planting screen between parking area and streets. R, ,GE 'u OF v Exhibit B Conditions of Approval For I 87-1 r r .V:I DR DESIGN REVIEW CO2:DI4I0I:S OF APPROVAL FOR ZND,,STRIAL PROJECT V-3 (DELEO CLhY TILE) 1. AF -oval is granted for the construction of an 1,890 square f000 t addition with this Yin= Design Review approval expiring after one (1) year, on June 9, 1988. 2. T^e applicant shall develop and sub -..it a "parking plan" that Will provide the required on-site parY.ing facilities for the entire building area; said par),4ng shall be located outside of any wall or fence which encloses and screens `.he site's outdoor storage area. 3. Precise landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submit el '0-- review orreview and approval to the Planning Division which provides landscating i=provements including a minimum ten foot (109) wide laacscaped planter and street trees to be located outside the outdoor storage area along the entire leng`rh of Y.inthorn Street Lnd landscaping within the required parking area. <. The proposed addition shallbe constructed) havee t.=eoosame ng color and e>.terior of .he existing building - materials having a Class "A" fire rating. pShall revious Conditions Of Approval shall be completed prior to :he issuance of building permits, or Bio plicrmanceant which provide a one hundred percent (100%) p Will guarantee the completion of all improvements required for `.his project and all previously approved projects. 6. The applicant shall meet all applicable city code requirements and ordinar._es. 7. E deco=alive, six-foot (6') high, block wall shell be constructed behind any required parY.ing along the Yin` -horn frontage to screen storage areas. Exhibit C Conditions of Approval For I 87-3 AGENDA ITEP'�1�{NO. S I PAGE 4r ,r INOR DESIGN REVIEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVALFOR REVISIONS TOO INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 87-1 = 87-3 (DELEO CLAY jJLEI 1. Approval is granted for the construction of the 1,890 square foot addition initially proposed under Industrial Project 87-3. 2. Minor Design Review approval will expire one (1) year from February 12, 1988. 3. All previous Conditions of Approval for Industrial Project 87-1 and 87-3 shall be strictly adhered to, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his designee. . 4. At such time as any further building additions are proposed beyond that for which this review is made the applicant shall provide the full complement of parking stalls/facilities required for the total (existing and proposed) building area pursuant to Chapter 17.66 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 5. A minimum six-foot (61) high block wall shall be installed adjacent to the Minthorn Parking facilities to screen open storage. Materials stored behind the wall shall not exceed the height of the wall at any time. 6. Revised landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Division. Plans shall clearly indicate upgrades to the parking area abutting Chaney Street and Minthorn Street. Irrigation shall be automatic. 7. The loading door located at the northwest corner of the site (Minthorn and Chaney) shall be removed and the entire wall refinished, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 8. The open storage occurring within the abandoned ATSF Railroad right-of-way shall be removed and shall be placed behind a view obscuring fence or wall at least six -feet (61) in height with no portion of the stored materials to exceed the height of the fence/wall. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. The applicant shall submit a request to the Engineering Department for approval of the installations within the public right-of-way along Minthorn and Chaney. 10. The applicant shall provide a "Hold Harmless" agreement for all encroachments in the public right-of-way, or shall remove these items from the right-of-way. 11. The applicant shall prove that the abandoned ATSF Railroad right-of-way is within his ownership or provide written documentation from the true owner that the planter constructed in that property (Collier and Chaney) may remain. 12. The applicant shall repair or reconstruct street improvements on Minthorn and Chaney and Chaney and Collier in accordance with City Standards subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Exhibit D Revised Conditions For I 87-1 and I 87-3 AGENDA ITEM NO. q-1 1 L 1 F _ / �! OF r !r] D E L E 0 - C L A T A T I L E APRIL 4, 1990 C"1 E Exhibit E Deleo Clay Tile Employee Count AGrDjJA ITEM NO. S� GI pR'E OF_L� I PLANNING COMMISION LAKE ELSINORE, CA. 92330 RE_ DELEO CLAY TILES PARKING CAPACITY/NEW ADDITION LOCATED AT 600 CHANEY ST., LAKE ELSINORE,.CA. DELEO CLAY TILE PRESENTLY HAS 28 PARKING SPACES ONE OF WHICH IS RESERVED FOR THE HANDICAPPED. CH,ANEY THESE PARKING SPACES ARE ADEQUATE FOR OUR EMPLOYEES. AT DELEO OUR WORK LOAD IS BROKEN DOWN INTO 3 SHIFTS; MEET THE DAY SHIFT CONSISTS OF 40 EMPLOYEES(13 carpool to _ work, and 3 rides bicycles), THE SWING SHIFT CONSISTS Ea�EEs!s OF 13 EMPLOYESS, AND THE GRAVE YARD SHIFT CONSISTS OF �AL!fOXSj OF 7 EMPLOYEES, FOR A TOTAL OF 60 EMPLOYEES. THE NEW ADDITION WILL NOT REQUIRE MORE EMPLOYEES. RESPECTFULLY, r\, J/ OE DELEO OWNER Exhibit E Deleo Clay Tile Employee Count AGrDjJA ITEM NO. S� GI pR'E OF_L� I L USE Industrial: r Manufacturing plants, machine shops, research or testing laboratories, public utility buildings and uses and printing plants Miscellaneous: Business offices Hospitals or sanitariums Churches Libraries Post offices Private clubs, lodges, and community centers, except golf courses and parks" Theaters, auditoriums, sports arenas, stadiums and assembly halls with or without fixed seats f MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED One for each one and one-half employees plus one for each company vehicle used in the operation of such plant, shop or laboratory. One for each two hundred fifty square feet of floor space. One for each two and one-half beds. One for each four seats in each building, used separately or together for worship. One per five hundred square feet of floor area plus one for each employee. One per two hundred square feet of floor area plus one per employee plus one for each official vehicle. One per two hundred square feet of floor area plus one per two hundred square feet of outside areas employed for purposes and meetings, by the members and guests, plus one per each five hundred square feet of outside areas developed for recreational purposes, such as gardens, swimming pools, and park areas. One for each four fixed seats on the premises plus one for each seven linear feet of fixed benches or one for each thirty square feet of floor area, whichever requires the greater number of parking spaces. -193- AGENDA N0. S ' PAG_.L OF Exhibit F Various Employee Based Parking Standards From San Jose, Fontana, and an Irvine Parking Study r r (3) Automobile dismantling 1 space for each 300 square operations. and junk, rag, fest of gross floor area, and metal, salvages scrap proc- 1 space for each 12,000 square essing, and recycling op- feet of gross yard area. orations. (4) Machine situps. 1 space for each 600 square fest of gross floor area. (1) Agricultural. Monet sxmt for dwellings. (2) Hospitals. 1 space for each three patient beds, p)uq 1 space for each 2 employs" on the maximum shift ~ than doctors, and 1 space for each staff doctor. .Ll AGENDA tTEh' NO.�j� PAGE OF� parking uses Reeuired "(15) Retail nurseries, 1 spaces for each 500 square garden shops, and similar feet of outdoor sales or establishments with display area. outdoor sales and display plus 1 space for each 2,500 area. square feet of growing grounds. (16) Automobile sales (and 1 space for each 300 square service) agencies, and fast of enclosed display or other types of sales, sales area, plus 1 space for ` service, and rental each 1.200 square feet of agencies for automotive outdoor sales or display area. vehicles, boats, and equipment. (c) 2ndu•trlal_ (1) Warehouses or other 1 space for each 1.200 square storage buildings. feet of gross floor area used exclusively for storage. plus 1 space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area in offices. (2) Manufacturing plants. 1 space for each 600 square assembly plants, and other feet of gross areas excluding industrial establishswmts. floor area used exclusively *'{or truck loading• or 1 !pace for each...ployee on the Uaxisw _shift. (3) Automobile dismantling 1 space for each 300 square operations. and junk, rag, fest of gross floor area, and metal, salvages scrap proc- 1 space for each 12,000 square essing, and recycling op- feet of gross yard area. orations. (4) Machine situps. 1 space for each 600 square fest of gross floor area. (1) Agricultural. Monet sxmt for dwellings. (2) Hospitals. 1 space for each three patient beds, p)uq 1 space for each 2 employs" on the maximum shift ~ than doctors, and 1 space for each staff doctor. .Ll AGENDA tTEh' NO.�j� PAGE OF� c C INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING Spaces/employee 1/1 - Healdsburg, Santa Ross 1/1 or 1/250 sq. ft., whichever greater - Campbell 1/1 or 1/300 sq. ft. - Pleasanton I/I.2 or 1/400 sq. ft. - Sunnyvale 1/1.3 or 1/450 sq. ft., whichever greater - Cupertino 1/1.5 - Livermore, Petaluma, Pleasant Hill, St. Helena 1/1.5 plus 1/company car - Los Gatos 2/3 employees but not less than 1/1000 sq. ft. - Brisbane r 1/2 - Alameda (C-redristrict), Fairfax, Solana County, Suisun 1/2 or 1/1000 sq. ft., whichever greater Alameda County, Concord I/2 but not less than 1/2000 sq. ft. - Marin County 1/2 but not less than 1/2000 sq. ft. plus 1/company car - Onion City 1/2 plus 1/company car - E1 Cerrito, Fairfield 1/2 plus I/company car plus 2 customer - Pacifica I/3 plus 1/400 sq. ft. except truck loading - Dixon { 1/3 plus 1/750 sq. ft - Vacaville (light) {i 3/4 plus 1/comp3ny car - San Rafael ! 1/3 Alameda (M-1 & M-2), Albany, Mill Valley I/3 but not less than 1/1000 sq. ft. - Millbrae ' 1/3 or 1/000 sq. ft., whichever greater - Vacaville (heavy) E u - BS/F(23) AGENDA ITEM NO. P. r,- 2� aFy ' • r r WAREHOUSING SPaces/Employee I/employee plus 4 spaces - Gilroy I/employee plus I/company car - San Rafael I/1.2 employees or 1/400 sq. ft. - Sunnyvale I/1.5 employees - Petaluma, San Leandro, Tiburon. 1/2 employees - Pleasant Hill, San Mateo County, Suisun I/2 employees or 1/1500 sq. ft., whichever greater - Fairfield 1/2 employees or 1/800 sq. ft., whichever greater - Concord 1/3 employees or 1/1000 sq. ft., whichever greater - Vacaville 1/3 employees or 1/2000 sq. ft., whichever greater - Santa Clara Spaces/so. ft. 1/500 sq. ft. - Campbell, Morgan Hill I/500 sq. ft. plus 1/company car - Mountain View 1/800 - Corte Madera, Cotati, Solana County 1/1000 - Contra Costa County, Palo Alto I/I000 excluding truck loading plus 1/employee - Saratoga 1/1500 - gross site or building area - Daly City I/1500 or I/leasable area, whichever greater - Novato I/2000 sq. ft. for less than 10,000; as determined by Planning Commission for ever 10,000 - Sausalito 1/2500 sq. ft. for less than 25,000; 1/1000 additional or 1/2 employees, which- ever greater - Pacifica OFFICE ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL 1/200 - Fremont 1/300 - Union City 1/350 net - Milpitas 1/500 - Novato. B8/F(30) AGENDA ITEM N0. _w�L PAGE OF_1�'q OFFICE USE ONLY Negative Declaration No. 90-29 Project:TT gfl_F_ parking Determination r WAX EIV E U CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE No -if 91988 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM tidnnir_veTJPer or Project: Contact Person:_ LAAracc- City: Teles Adill rhanpv Rt_ Elsinore, CA Zip: 92330 2. Environmental Information Prepared by:-Butt-erfi'eld-"Su'rveys Address: - p-ir�ox-1649 City: Lake Elsinore, CA Zip:92330 3. Proposed Project Title: Additinn to nelen Clay Tile Location: rrhia nrnjpnt is lnnated at thp cmuthpaqtgrly rnrnar of rhanPW Gtreat and collier AVenn P_ Total site acreage: Gross: Net:4_6 Ac. For Residential Project: Number of units: Dwelling units per acre: Unit sizes (square feet): Attach brief description of proposed project, including intended use, and phasing of project, or if present. project is..a phase or,portion of a larger project. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by local, regional, state, and federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal. Water District. 5. Environmental Setting: Attach a description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and surrounding pro- perties, including information on topography, geo- logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. AGENDA iTEJ.: N0. .7/) LL Pn?E OF GENERAL EXISTING LAND USE. ZONING PLAN Project site Manufacturing of Limited In Clay tile products M1 dustrial & lood way incTe Surrounding Ayres Commercial lood plain North Center M1 & lood way Surrounding Right -Way Sewage Flood way East Disposal Storage M1 Fringe Area Surrounding South Vacant M1 Flood way Fringe Surrounding Vacant CM Limited West Industrial AGENDA iTEJ.: N0. .7/) LL Pn?E OF xl xl xl xl 1 I • I I I I I I I 1 r1 pY O To o O C ••YI O e b v m O c n 1 0 ^OI 0 0 P'�• YGG � ~ q �ODU YCY Qq OY O O YNti PY6 OH 6Y0� ✓✓ aW YY Y CO NL �YC NYCY Y wO,AN ON pH✓✓ Y•A N P O •il''G O wCly yY M at.', O Y•OY i< tl% P 4 N Y b O G Y O i O H Y % coo 0 A NM Y 0.p q ••PI O Y C q V OYNM q (=am ,NO NGOO UN ~�b G�0 t U > OYt Y ✓'•NI 6 Y uti 7 U 7F /O� YMO A�S� aL1gN ODYN •U A N O C w N 6 Y• Y Y N O G C Y U Y 4 C A C N h Q O tl Y tl O S w C 40gyyY C O ON~G L� i Y H D.A aM.iL C�Y ~.Ni L C Y i NY O O 00 00 •�N ••Y•SO _ s ON N•M Pr JY u - H CON {q� Y C p > � .• Y p yOu•6 UU MYM1 {{0�1✓ • �1 +IN Yh O y Mh q�.gg1 ••+Oh•l• ••1 YY 1Yp�L Cb r�0 ¢ YCp NY NN -� U�C OA Y•A 'UU .I PYNSHAU UGbq OC•-IOq 1 O ¢C YY NN YM 04N L ✓60 pM YYY yN C Pte• ••• N q 99 �1•I N_I C u i C'E C T M Y Oi O R u V 4 a LLau G 4 H N C O O +1 Y O N b• •OI Y N ~ U ••• p%O, > oU ✓ T Y Y tl N M N .*q N VM ql Y141YS CSP MOHMtl C9 q; Utl tlti MM•.GI CDYS M0 W d ON a; -1GiC W e 1'lii .�tf1$P OpC5P 0•" S iY r �j O FM i A U O Rli i A Y HFO I.1M O GY V H O Y V G i YOM 7 F� Y ti Y U b l 1 •DibC N P d YL O �tp p O~yfi�"8YY N Ni0 HAN NY NF N ✓9 Uy D COMh •.Gl ylq 0. C .006 CYO OO O i U✓4Ad S N4 Y •••,,G4G u'C C�i HY9 O p w Y O✓Y'I 4 H O4Y UY YT grlY 4P .IP •A H✓Y q 0 O YU 0 O �1 N SO' E 60 A O N 60 O ✓ OL YON 03 O Y HOtl Pd X 9N G094 C✓ ✓NN O.Oi •Oi O > •y • Y O YV•NG 4 C•A✓ 6N0 Fa O OTi G✓O jp:0 ySQ09; ;OL aMN C V p O -C M4N0 O Y✓+•h tt�+C✓ O qN YpYO 9 ✓i PY N9 9Hyy0. O Oh O• v C Y 6 wy N p O UA H N U Y n O 4• �1 .. Q U F H•• p✓ O V Y C 0 4 O M G Y A Y :{ h ✓ •'� p N ✓ C p •'• Y> h N N • Y Y U •-I O X H Y N 4 Y 4 Y Y O CXY 4 qM1 C O N yO U,I' qY ON M LO G`ANU .•T DN YY; COY •N 4N NgU9 N MYY p cop •MN COp4 Y GO •i C4g0 CN ✓9 ~Ni+{Y Y••• CN c'O'C'AH M Oi 0. O W y •AHN �1 DO GD Y a, ✓NO 00 CqE HYO Ntlf�• n G U L 5 ✓ 4 .moi A O O Y C O •-1 O ✓ A O 9 2 ••• � P •�•'•• w ••• '•1 i 9 Q. ✓ D •+ N go •1 O Y p Y G Y q Y•p ✓HOT •A Y C N Y P G ✓ V N N T S O A Y O a 9 Y Y C A Y H✓ q N q Y 11yy�� S. H 9✓ N O q D A i•1 ti_ Y Y Y Y Y G 9 9 q O U yY' N O✓ - 4 q✓ M• O'O P U Y O✓ q M D O Y ✓ D.. .I M O ,,UcG ApY Y N UC 00 vUq{O1 nnG N M lyG�+I O Y Y N GG T U Y C H~ Y ✓O ..Y11 N Y yC0 00 O i Y 0 e••• ~p �pOyy1. q✓ ~ UY•~ �Otl Hq •CYS.i, Y UUYO UtINi .�O U�A LIiV OG✓O •COi YP�OSA �tlpu y AO W •+ Hh ✓P. L <ti � A O S ••Gi q A U O Y. H b A �' N � X1 I x xl xl x1 x) xi ' 1 1 I I xI •I I I I I I I GY V H O Y V G i YOM 7 F� Y ti Y U b l 1 •DibC N P d YL O �tp p O~yfi�"8YY N Ni0 HAN NY NF N ✓9 Uy D COMh •.Gl ylq 0. C .006 CYO OO O i U✓4Ad S N4 Y •••,,G4G u'C C�i HY9 O p w Y O✓Y'I 4 H O4Y UY YT grlY 4P .IP •A H✓Y q 0 O YU 0 O �1 N SO' E 60 A O N 60 O ✓ OL YON 03 O Y HOtl Pd X 9N G094 C✓ ✓NN O.Oi •Oi O > •y • Y O YV•NG 4 C•A✓ 6N0 Fa O OTi G✓O jp:0 ySQ09; ;OL aMN C V p O -C M4N0 O Y✓+•h tt�+C✓ O qN YpYO 9 ✓i PY N9 9Hyy0. O Oh O• v C Y 6 wy N p O UA H N U Y n O 4• �1 .. Q U F H•• p✓ O V Y C 0 4 O M G Y A Y :{ h ✓ •'� p N ✓ C p •'• Y> h N N • Y Y U •-I O X H Y N 4 Y 4 Y Y O CXY 4 qM1 C O N yO U,I' qY ON M LO G`ANU .•T DN YY; COY •N 4N NgU9 N MYY p cop •MN COp4 Y GO •i C4g0 CN ✓9 ~Ni+{Y Y••• CN c'O'C'AH M Oi 0. O W y •AHN �1 DO GD Y a, ✓NO 00 CqE HYO Ntlf�• n G U L 5 ✓ 4 .moi A O O Y C O •-1 O ✓ A O 9 2 ••• � P •�•'•• w ••• '•1 i 9 Q. ✓ D •+ N go •1 O Y p Y G Y q Y•p ✓HOT •A Y C N Y P G ✓ V N N T S O A Y O a 9 Y Y C A Y H✓ q N q Y 11yy�� S. H 9✓ N O q D A i•1 ti_ Y Y Y Y Y G 9 9 q O U yY' N O✓ - 4 q✓ M• O'O P U Y O✓ q M D O Y ✓ D.. .I M O ,,UcG ApY Y N UC 00 vUq{O1 nnG N M lyG�+I O Y Y N GG T U Y C H~ Y ✓O ..Y11 N Y yC0 00 O i Y 0 e••• ~p �pOyy1. q✓ ~ UY•~ �Otl Hq •CYS.i, Y UUYO UtINi .�O U�A LIiV OG✓O •COi YP�OSA �tlpu y AO W •+ Hh ✓P. L <ti � A O S ••Gi q A U O Y. H b A �' N � .I x1 I I x I I xi • d LL Y O >Oy>y 9 S Y l l f M WS 4 Y>!M•Ni .Y•.OiP GrnuW.Mao • N�HO 0 CqN YTN•Ad>q Q 4 Y d 0c Y I S C C N 4 U Y G S r 0 [✓.' • YP GN CM y'• Y4✓ Y p ED O Y Y 9••{ +• > N N U •w ON O G Y 4 •.IPO V >>•• Y bPN 11 G O0Y CGC > G✓ O Y C Ll >• • A Y ww N+1 .I F ..•.. u NDC nun 3 4 0 ✓� P q 0 !! T.IUM H q ' + 090•u Y •N YCNi YYN> ->N • u uO„buV u OY ON•AO Nq>' Ya GW .0 :0. .•A ✓ H n. i r Ov O {�0 •A rls �0✓P C ✓ 14. .I O 1 t ✓N ObwY l• N YY0. > q M U.A Y-4 N�1YYY qLU O 11 O YL P U Y 00.D M✓O OY•OOM ' L6 YON n L 4YYN »+ GYYGON Y N•-1 Y Gb G+1 M 0�9q qNY' 49GGq 64gDN L P Y •YAN Y✓ b pp Go Y Y U N Y O q M O U Y N Y Y 4 O N M.•N O N Y N U O Y g r1 O q 4 G N Y P S VMO "9 A✓ Y Q Q g Y 9 N G✓ C C rl ✓ ••� Y> N Y C F 0 M •'� C 9 N .1 N N M F !1 D TL Y Y P+I U O L 9 Y Y Y M C ••I •A Y Y q •AP U O TY i q0. 9•A Y ASCO) 0Y� OFb P4 • • NT Yw0 O 9n N Y✓ OPgY .I qU gLYuo N ✓LNM'•+ N[iT b CO 9U M t+• QH O UN M COj: NY N YA Y Y> 6C•I g Y NO Y •� ✓ b' YY L O F .0 N O 4 CN 00 a. q Y 00 > ti V C YA T rF UY. Y,I Oti 0 Y �I U ✓ 9 •+ O �n •} L L G V✓ YVM6 O Ud N> MM N N N A 9 O C Y q O fl U9 YY q—UP 6S N9bN "V Y••IMNUCY••Y e q••I✓ O N M I 1• O• +10 P CCU G ON O OU✓•AL Qq•yN OVA Y O P+•+I 09 C Mw ✓ •+Q4 UI YO> Q. F - `0 O Y 0OM •N C YYMOF 6r1F•"IN • YU w 9 W MUIU MYNYBV J✓N MNG - 6VY O yG MM 4 •OM1 4U Oq MP ✓YO YON OA NMY 4T OYN I qY • YM+1Y O+I T C A F 4 O• N N ✓N UqN 0-0 Y OG NYl•9M DO ✓>✓L L -u0 L0 Y QA {N{�• U Y?? 0. xv TO NH.N Y so CC•A M �,Y�••'-'VO-C'- M'O+GI N'GYtl0 P Y p0 1 Y N q M d O O •( U Y n .I Y Y K V O 'd UU N .� .. Y YL. Y PN -0 O O^ •N •••N ' O -O M1— •Nba VNPN NMO O✓ q 4 p0 6 u.� N YP 0. Y D.A. .p. D✓gNM 1 0Y C6NC r=i Y✓9�tiY NqW O✓+10 •�I •3 AO✓ QUY YCM YO Y'4'i •J GOM •AMY YOYGTMO O•'•• PON✓ CN N T Y.7 • • L4 q q 6M Y q> N.• A N ✓ 4b P •• H e g N {I ✓ I O U NF... N Y N qL U V U pp qI❑: M 4 V PG'J C O✓ 90 pp O P✓ q Y G T✓✓ LNC+• ••I Y q Y qOq✓ Y>f O �l g V. p. LIU+•H Y Y00✓ c w 4 9 •C �q0l. PYUU1 Y V M q U 4 O O•• N N M G G✓ N11 O N YDq !. M Y Y LL M Y GGq+I A N F�IB N U 0 00• J( Y 2 H m W0 NN • wY w404 wU�IU 2 ib GOY414 V 0 A P> u 0 u 0 UP•• l-•OSN SiY u u Y 1 M ti N> O C N .y M M N N N 11 d •A Q N'A t •• la I U✓ m L U.H 4Y i Lti 6 C • d✓ •••K N O N U QN • Y .. Y U b N ••0• q D O M'•• Y C L 0V A✓ V V 9 W •A q A U 9 n QQ po6O Wu•a✓ C buO VU N•• ��D Y> 4 N N C✓ a, F '•• Y Y ..•.A q 1' O N 0. ri 1 K i0 V 1+44 iYG M L 14UgN I 1 �l ��OF..----- PACE x( x( xl x 1 IF Lu 1 �O M YiYY M H O YF 7 N 1 6666660.N0 - 000.a OYtlNN Y69U Y OM1 0004 YNGO M 6 •OO Y O O 0 A O U Y D✓ O p✓>•O YO N NN✓Vtl L ON M' N U✓ N H a Y Y 01 A G O Y AM. -I C O O N U.0 0.0 N S Y G -OV VA C Y N C Y Y. A. U L U Y mu aAl M M V U Neo • 0✓0.0 OTYY OU••• OPNq M w Y 6ewLY pLwO 6 FYM1 6N>4 NCP✓ U 0 Ou N O R.• O O> p q O N x A, q N Y Y U Y Y Y Y U Y N M = V N M Ytl O QY�O 6Y •H 4 pN0 0.YY C O N O M N Y U N N P N Y -1 >,U Y •q�U qp N-.• OJ C✓L'M ac .9tlu Y� S>L••Y19E 9Ott N S41YC ..OI 0•N1 od -1 HM9MD NC041 O YY a NYMY Yu /Gp q N tl�N N NY•,A Y✓NMM N•MU0 •p . •.,N N wGG O NGY 4O0N�•%a NNqq�✓u� Y 3tiYAY i•N6CA0 00 0 0.0 O0Y $Yu0. 00Y Y✓ tl A U O w e M N XIX Ixl XI x► XI I xi xi �dxlxlxlxl xl I s III I I I xl� I Iillil I I I � III 1( I i I.. 111111 I I Y M1>� N Mw N h < C U O) N C Vb N YN h b 0 9 004 e N LOG O e M P q Y w k Y Q. tl0 N Y N n• O M. S 9 0 e O COGOu ✓ M Y C N C OPOYC O> N Y X Y 4 N O ✓N HO>✓UT4 YM•+ 4 N+1 O YC 4d 4dNP 0 C P N Y gMNM1 0 4NA N NU O g,YG 1•• Uf•• G•O N 4 Nh WN a 4GgC P Y q 0 M L AAU.. YF ✓r1N YN0 www C✓ N O 00 Q.O ✓ DO M Y✓i. w N T M C O S C..X .+ (O.U•J>MG eY 4NPdO Y4Mi N Y ••1 YdS 6G Y'MN 0u =NOY C U C 0. VY U•••4> LOCO q U e O N TG N O YY OW O ✓ Y✓ C Y Cd CX VAN "wON M Y -1 H G N GY 0 YN ✓O CYN YCO N U Y•1 ON 8 Y qC .i.CAY ✓N O C ✓ 'O q N NOV. 4q NY Y+1Y4 C. Y O AN 2 F YY 0 U N'ONO Y O 4 -5 •• 04L Y NANO LO b tl Y T U ✓ ✓. Y. M Y ,Nq mc W" Y A w 0"A N F N O✓ V V Y e>C tl O OU 0 Y P00 ••tli 4040 3G0tl C A b ✓ N M OY00 ON 5tlwU0 YY N>i CPum 0 q O 0. M1 MM 6-•1 Do M Y Y O Y A H U 4 0 0 Y COF✓ AN •G i� Y q,N, HF~O•C, •• 6 Y N DN Y•YiM Pu 3•• NY WVwm) IO YYY O ., M1 O. S > S0 wC Y OV NYYU MC tl Y Y N U O Y q Y N N M•N G O M C U N Y N G O H H H ! .fin q N Y 4 S Y N C U C•NS q N NNNHNq Y .1 O XC CM9 Y'v •M 0AMOG Y+1 Y Y B Y U H YY qYN OY -iA 4M i q 'iAYY Y N A HO -•iUq Y Y AY90' M (� i 6✓> O N R'Y v0A 6Y ✓ Y M. U Y Y✓ O Y O U 0 A 0 q O S 0 >>.�YI N W 'J Y O Y W ✓✓ Y Y - D O 0 Y V O N g V G Il O 0 U Y N O Y •MO YN+•q W 0. N 0.Y ZWN ON b� 00 NOYYO NNYC•• 0. U Z N N N CM UAAN W4 G•-IYL RC d7 M4Nq> YO NOV ON qgq V'J Vi O 4P YN .INNMA 00 • AY CO 4=iA Y 4 Y C • • s C A • Y Y T✓ M, 40Y 0YN tl A U b A N WH D A G1YYtl✓ 0 A U O tl W S0. 0 A gNgV 40 0> M N M N YNI N N 1 - 'J M N 'J ✓ q q 1 V C 0 M Y 1 'O I I l I I I I I I I I I I COq VC 4 0 L N Y O o 0 Y O d 9 MN 0.0 q NY4 N YNI N N 1 - 'J M N 'J ✓ q q 1 V C 0 M Y 1 'O Y 0 N 1 O N ONA NNCI NOVe C o>. XC COq VC 4 0 L N Y O o 0 Y O d 9 MN 0.0 q NY4 ✓eT YM2 OVq4V NOxYN OP4WC 0 1, 0 AC0 O C 0.M CMqO .NUY>i OV • OO cC O O Y O4ONR NNYqD 4d ✓Cq VCY NYO YMR O6O OYtlTq ✓CVµ YN •q 02Uti0✓ NN0 N�j +9N1 'qOOq NY.NYl NNy0q NO YNNOYO44 Yq}YY1 •NUN 0 CY YUd 04N✓CO NPN LYeby M✓6PG 0 1N q qpNbY .Y.I µN "NqL U> N F4Y Y P q vu U" b N n• Y• P 6 4 N N N Y q O R VOYY>. -VT• U G U •• • C L M NOG d A LYN Y N G O e Y 0. C Y 0 0 N G MNG Y N O N N Y C ✓ LVa N -n Ya 9q S•• ON ON ✓M O M0t10 Ac NN NY %Y -N MG ✓UOh 0 4 Y r Y V 4 O Y C O C .• Y N -• O Q. ✓ O q O> *'n X q N 6 D AWG UY MY i e VY OVF4 NV O PO \N YH MN NN09 MM G 7004 N.• �❑ Y •N FPn. NNd APO 'ie •4 MCC GO CN CNA AV- COLO D CN +,OY D p �G V n• Y O G b N g d Y L U >• N -n A O 4 O 0 U N 6 •1 w q ✓✓ ✓.Nw ON YG ✓4Y Y> •NN 0vu- URY 011C •nVV NO •NG +, YPw. .r0i A, on Nn. • b a. .0 Y Y Y C C U N G Y N q N C D -N C • q $ b Y Y N Y O b U 3 C G N Y C Y Y V N Y ti Cr VN qT aau 6N V NCJ NO q4 AA M YT 064\0C YO w VCO N r NPN U Y N Y C -n C• GVL VNO N UGY✓0„ A . NY✓ YY✓ NC LYq r N A OY Nq 00 YAV90t0 Y✓ T P g% O ✓YCw UqU NC O v O Od =O -nn N GY O N✓NYg NN 4 qNUN UC4 O0 .4 CYVGU✓UYY -1• UV •1 N Uq{I WNN NYb KROA •(A✓ MAA LL X 4 U Y L •1 q N; q N L N A M U q M 6 a A N O .n li tti 6 q A N. •• O V At• O " 0 µ a V O Y • V 'J O N N O O: q U G q N 1•-•• F 3 q A U • / Y AGENDA ITESM N0,6 N N ✓ M F.2 OF FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ESAM YBEL00 I. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self-sustaining.levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental ✓/ goals? _ C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? All of the above must be answered "no".for a negative declaration to be issued. II. DETERMINATION: The proposed project should not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. Although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, it will not in this case because of the attached mitigation measures. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. III. REVIEWED BY: DATE: PLANNING DIRECTOR: DATE: r 1-23-86 AGENDA ITEW NO. Y— (� PAGE � 1 OF ?"Of C C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED 3. This proposal is to construct a metal building approximately 220 feet long by 68 feet wide along the northeasterly boundary of subject property for a total of 14,960 square feet. The building will be placed as shown on the site plan adjacent to the existing clay storage with no space between them. This building is for clay tile product. This kiln would suffer considerable damage if left unprotected from the weather. 4. No other permits or public approvals will be required for the project. 5. The existing project site has approximately 67,128 square feet of metal buildings which house kilns, clay storage, office, and production area. The easterly portion of the property serves as open storage for manufactured clay products. This project would environmentally enhance the appearance of this project by effectively screening the storage area with a combination of the proposed building and a block wall on the northerly side which is the direction of Interstate 15, approximately 500 feet away. To the east exists a storage area which Right -way uses for storage of portable restrooms. To the south exists vacant land to about 2000 feet distance where the Temescal Wash runs in a westerly direction. The wash may harbor some wildlife and plant life, however, the project is far enough from the wash that no impacts should result. 6a. The most intense solar path is from the south and therefore solar access rights would be most affected on properties adjacent to and north of this project. Since the property immediately to the north is only 30 feet wide it will not meet ordinances for a future development and solar access rights may not be needed. 6b. No solar systems anticipated at this time. 6c. No use of energy conservation measures anticipated at this time. 7. Environmental Impacts: lb. Some overcovering and compaction may occur, however, all grading, overcovering, or compaction that may occur will be accomplished strictly in accordance with all City Ordinances and the Uniform Building Code. lc. Any change in topography or ground surface relief will be minimal with no significant degradation in the general appearance of the area. le. While minor increases in run-off are expected from the additional roof area, this water is anticipated and adequate provisions are proposed for its control to prevent any erosion. 3b. Additional run-off is expected and as proposed on the grading plan, this run-off is directed toward the easterly side of the property then directed southerly to Minthorn Street, which has sufficient capacity to handle all run-off from this property. J^ AGEPi:s ITEM NO. FAaE r r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED 5a. The kiln, which this proposal will house, operates on natural gas. Although an increased use of natural gas is expected, it will not be considered excessive for this type of operation. 6a. Some noise level increases are expected with operation of the kiln which this building will house, however, the block wall proposed along the northerly side of this building will maintain slightly increased noise levels within the building itself. 13b. By ordinance this proposal will result in a requirement for additional parking spaces. This building addition will not require additional employees as explained by the project description. This operation is for manufacturing only and wholesale of products. Traffic generation is minimal. A concurrent application is for minor variation in parking requirements. Based on the low parking demand no impacts are anticipated from the proposal. AGENDA ITE NO. PAucCF_ REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Commercial Project 89-1, Desicrn Review Time Extension: Sam Hsieh: A request for a one-year time extension on the Design Review approval of an 18,000 sauare foot commercial/office project. n� Dave Gunderman PREPARED BY: �� ��`��'� APPROVED BY: Gabrielle Restivo Dave Gunderman Associate Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. APPROVED BY: , C2 Rop Mole dyl City Manager BACKGROUND The Lake Elsinore City Council approved this Commercial Project located at the northwest corner of San Jacinto Road and Casino Drive on June 27, 1989 (minutes and staff report attached). North and west elevations were enhanced to include inset arches similar to the front elevation. The project has final Building, Engineering and Planning Department plan checks, and rough grading has begun. All building permit conditions of approval have been met pending this extension. The architect for this project is the same as that for the Plaza Del Sol Commercial Center on Casino Drive. The building will greatly enhance the Casino Drive area and exceeds design review requirements. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council extend the Design Review approval for Commercial Project 89-1, for a period one (1) year, based on the following Findings. FINDINGS 1. The project will not result in environmental impacts. 2. The project meets the design review requirements of the Municipal Code. AGENDA ITEM NO.*5� PAGE / OF /0 r C. PAGE THREE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 r ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR `'.9. equest to Waive Fees - Chamber of Commerce - Lake Communi C ter. Cou ilman Dominguez requested that the cleaning fee be char d whenever someone uses the Community Center. Comm u ity Services Director Watenpaugh advised that t is is normal a $50 cleaning fee. Counci_r Starkey inquired whether the $50 was a efundable or non -re ndable fee. Community Services Direct r Watenpaugh dvised that it is a non-refundable arge. MOVED BY DOMINGUE SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIE BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESE T TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TOW VE FEES SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON ITIONS; WITH ONE EXCEPTION AT THE $50.00 CLEANING FEE WILL NOT BE WAIVED. Conditions 1. Chamber prVRecra nce poli y for one million dollars shty as ditionally insured. 2. Chamber seperm' and clear any security requiremenhe verside County Sheriff's Office beft. I0. Request to Waive Fion & Park District - Lake Community Center. Councilman Starkey question d t e recommended denial, and commented that he does not feel hat the City should be paying the costs for othe entiti\dosit Community Services Director Watenpaugh clar fied thaPark District has paid a $50.00 cleaning fee d $500.00 on the building for ongoing activities. Councilman Domingue expressed concern ith the recommended denial of the requ t; he felt that any se of the building should be support so it does not sit u sed. Councilman Wash rn requested that staff de elop the necessary chan es in the existing policies t reflect the requirement o the $50.00 cleaning charge. MOVED BY WASHBUR SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED B UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE P ESENT TO DENY THE REQUESTED WAIVER OF FEES AND CHARGE THE $50 00 CLEANING FEE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED. PUBLIC None. BUSINESS//DISCUSSION ITEMS 51.- Commercial Project 89-1 _ Sam Hsieh. Proposal for a 18,000 square foot, two-story commercial building, with retail use on the lower floor and office use on the second floor; situated on a 42,808 square foot lot, located at the northwest corner of Casino Drive and San Jacinto Road. City Planner Thornhill detailed this proposal and highlighted the improved new elevations being proposed for the freeway side of this development. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE Z OF, _ r r PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 Councilman Washburn requested clarification of Condition #43 and suggested that Condition #15 should be deleted, so they C will not be able to utilize outside storage. Mayor Winkler suggested that the wording of Condition #15 be reworded to state "No outdoor storage shall be allowed". MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-15, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findings 1. The project is consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. If the recommended Conditions are met, the project will meet City design and development requirements for commercial development pursuant to Chapter 17.48, 17.38 and 17.82 of the Municipal Code. 3. No significant environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-1 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS WITH CONDITION #15 AMENDED AS SUGGESTED BY MAYOR WINKLER. Planning Division Conditions 1. Design Review approval for Commercial Project 89-1 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year from the date of City Council approval. 2. All Conditions of Approval shall be fully implemented within the project design in all phases and/or strictly adhered to. 3. Full compliance of all Conditions of Approval shall occur to the satisfaction of the City prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 5. All required off-site improvements shall be completed in accordance with improvement plans approved by the city engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 6. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 7. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or his designee. 8. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for irclusion in the case records. 9. A revised plot plan shall be submitted by the AGENDA ITEM NO. /� PACE.L_. OFA r r PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 applicant prior to Building Division issuance of C permits which reflects all Conditions of Approval. This revised plot plan shall become the approved plot plan only upon review and approval by the Community Development Director or his designee. 10. Revisions approved site plan or building elevations shall be subject to Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall demonstrate compatibility with the submitted plans date stamped 5-24-89 as modified by Conditions of Approval herein. 11. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. 12. All undeveloped and/or construction areas associated with the site shall be maintained in a safe and neat manner at all times. 13. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday to protect adjacent occupants from unreasonable noise and glare associated with construction. 14. Applicant shall comply with City Noise and Grading standards during construction phases of development. 15. No outdoor storage shall be allowed. 16. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards and shall include a trellis subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 17. All equipment must be ground mounted and enclosed. 18. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 19. No outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 20. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the building. 21. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. A detail shall be included in the building plans, subject to the approval of the postal service and the Community Development Director or his designee. 22. Brick pavers or texture treatments shall be laid in bank designs and shall be located at the driveway approaches. 23. A final landscaping irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or his designee. L 24. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage. 25. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected fromthe ITEM AGENDA ITEI��NO. �a52% PAGE. I OF,—L, r r PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 City Street Tree list, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and at least 15 -gallon in size, as approved by the C Community Development Director or his designee. 26. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb. 27. Planting within ten -feet (10') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches .(36"). 28. Landscape planters shall be placed between opposing rows of parking stalls as shown on site plan date stamped 5-24-89. Planter islands shall be five -feet (5') wide planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen years. Irrigation and ground covers shall also be provided. 29. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscaping plan and screened as part of the landscaping plans. Final landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval prior to issuance of building permits and shall include the following: a) Irrigation and plant specifications consistent with City Landscape Guidelines. b) Pay applicable fees. c) Landscape entry shall utilize more Agapnathus Africanus, Hemerocallis species, and mordea bicolor. d) Only City Street Trees from approved list may be used along Casino Drive and San Jacinto Road frontages. e) Incorporate mounding and shrub hedge, ie photinia, along Casino Drive and San Jacinto Road frontages. f) Delete the following frost sensitive plan species from plant list: 1) Cupania anacardioides (Carrotwood Tree) 2) Erythrina Caffra (Kaffirbloom Coral Tree) 3) Hibiscus Huegelii (Blue Hibiscus) g) All plants listed in plant legend must be shown on landscape plan or deleted from list. 30. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for any portion of the buildings. 31. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the architecture of the building. The location of on-site lighting shall be shown on plans submitted for building permit issuance and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 32. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent AGENDA ITEM NO. —%P— PAGE 6 OF 10 r r PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 colors, materials and specifications which will enhance C the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. All signage including freestanding signs shall be by City Permit and in conformance with the approved Master Signage Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of each sign. 33. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 34. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official. 35. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection and shall include any additional requirements requested by the Fire Marshal. A fire detector check assembly shall be required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. 36. Only Class "A" fire retardant roofing materials are to be used. 37. Meet all requirements of the Riverside County Health Department. 38. Meet all state handicap requirements. 39. Parking stalls shall be double -striped with four -inch (4") lines two -feet apart. 40. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all internal one-way drive aisles. 41. No surface drainage shall be permitted to cross sidewalks. 42. All landscaped improvements to be bonded 120%, Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/ acceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for one (1) year. 43. Provide evidence that underground gasoline tanks have been removed, otherwise, meet all applicable federal, state and local requirements governing removal of tank prior to issuance of building permits. 44. Evidence of a parcel merger must be provided or the applicant must submit an application and obtain approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Engineering Department Conditions 45. Construct all off-site improvements per approved street plans, plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (L.E.M.C. 16.34) r AGENDA ITEM NO. , PAGE (P OF r r PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 46. Street Improvement plans and specification shall be prepared by a civil engineer and improvements shall be to / Riverside County Road Department standards and City Codes l - (L.E.M.C. 12). 47. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works off-site improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 48. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). 49. Submit a letter of verification to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to applying for building permit. 50. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on San Jacinto Road to provide for a 56 foot roadway and 10 foot parkway. 51. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on Casino Drive to provide for an 80 foot right-of-way and 64 foot roadway 52. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way for a corner cut-off at Casino Drive and San Jacinto Road to provide for a turning curb return approved by the City Engineer. 53. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 54. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 55. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through site or provided for by a method approved by the City Engineer. 56. All public works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 57. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 58. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 59. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 60. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County fire protection. 61. Contribute $100.00 to the City Master Entryway Sign Program. 62. Post required Labor and material Bond and Performance Bond for Public Work Improvements off-site. AGENDA iTEFl: NO. S61 PACE OF /0 f PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1989 63. Contribute 1% ($10,000) of the cost for widening the i bridge at San Jacinto River and Casino for at least 1% of the future traffic crossing the bridge will enter this site. 64. Applicant shall stripe a Class II bicycle lane to Cal Trans specifications along Casino Drive. 52.\ral al Project 89-2 Chevron, U.S.A.. Inc. to construct a self -serve gasoline sales/retail mi i - a 0.904 acre site on the southwest corner of Dexte and Avenues in a General Commercial Zoning District. cey, representing Chevron, advised that they are n ence with Staff's recommendations. ner Thornhill detailed this proposal and sho ed m nts that have been made based on staff and lanning io recommendations. Councilman ashburn questioned the deletion of C dition #6 C and requeste that an additional question be ad ed to require that the roo tiles match those of the develop ents across the street. He al o inquired as to location of r and water facilities and he standards of the undergr nd gas tanks. City Planner Tho nhill confirmed that Cond' ion #6 should be deleted, and agre d with Councilman Washb n's request that the roof tiles ma h the other developme s. The applicant confirmed the air d water location an commented on the standards for gas t ks. Councilman Dominguez quired whethe restroom facilities were being required. Staff onfirmed t y would be required. Mike Lucey, representing Chevron commented on the signage requirements and his conc rn wi the loss of identity without the corporate colors and s na e. Council concurred to accept the judgment of the Plannin ommission with regard to the sign program. Councilman Starkey also ex res ed concern with the company's lack of identity. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDE BY STARK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO OPT NEGATI DECLARATION 89-1; ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELO Findings 1. Subject to the Conditions of proval, Commercial Projec 89-2 is not anticipate to result in any signi icant impacts. 2. The project, as approved, with th adopted Conditions of Approval, provides conformance ith the Goals and 0 iectives of the General Plan and eneral Commercial 3. The project complies with design direc ives of Chapter 17.82.060 and all other applica le provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. /4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Cha ter 17.82.070 have been incorporated into the proval of Commercial Project 89-2, insuring developme t to occur in accordance with objectives of Chapt 17.82.060 and the site's C-2, General Commerc 1 AGENDA ;TErvi NO. PAS- �0//0 Ck 0�0 A c REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: JUNE 27, 1989 SUBJECT: Commercial Project 89-1: Sam Hsieh; Proposal for a 18,000 square foot, two- story commercial building, with retail use on the lower floor and office use on the second floor; situated on a 42,808 square foot lot, located at the northwest corner of Casino Drive and �11i San Jacinto Road. PREPARED BY C Ic�APPROVED BY: Gary Thornhill APPROVED BY: Gab lle Restivo Gary Thornhill Ron Molendyk Assistant Planner City Planner City Manager BACKGROUND At the meeting of June 6, 1989, Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of Commercial Project 89-1 (Minutes and Staff Report attached). DISCUSSION The architecture of the structure is Spanish Mission and features arched entries, columns, and wrought iron railing and planter flower boxes in the upper elevations. The architecture matches that of the recently approved Commercial/hotel center located approximately 180 feet west of the Casino Drive/San Jacinto Road intersection. The elevations are cream stucco with gray trim and columns, exposed rafters and red tile roofing. Proposed awnings are blue and red canvas materials. The Planning Commission modified Condition #17 to require all equipment to be ground mounted and screened; Condition #29 was modified to require final landscape plan approval by the Planning Commission. Conditions 7, 9, 15, 19, 21, and 25 were modified to add the verbiage "Community Development Director or his designee," which is standard verbiage for Conditions of Approval. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the findings listed, adopt Negative Declaration 89-15, and approve Commercial Project 89-1, subject to the attached sixty-four (64) Conditions of Approval. It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 PAGE -9, OF 10 c Page 2 June 27, 1989 Subject: Commercial Project 89-1: Sam Hsieh Findings: 1. The project is consistent with Objectives of the General Plan. C the Goals, Policies, and 2. If the recommended Conditions are met, the project will meet City design and development requirements for commercial development pursuant to Chapters 17.48, 17.38, and 17.82 of the Municipal Code. 3. No significant environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. AGENDA ITEt�h/�NO. SI /� PAS E L.- OF _1 tL_- CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVE GUNDERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Ir DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 J SUBJECT: TIME E%TENSION REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23381; CAMELOT PROPERTIES The City Council on its July 24, 1990 meeting extended the above referenced project to the August 28, 1990. PROGRESS REPORT The K -Mart store management has been cooperative with staff in fulfilling all requirements of the Planning Division. The parking lot has been restriped, the storage containers have been removed and the outside storage by the Garden Center has been removed. Landscaping and irrigation have been improved and will be in substantial compliance with the approved plans upon completion. Grading and drainage issues are still contingent upon the development of other sites (i.e. Days Inn, Phase II and the north parking lot). It is recommended that the City Council reaffirm Negative Declaration 87-38 and to extend Tentative Parcel Map 23381 to the September 11, 1990 City Council meeting. /cm AGENDA ITEM iv0..//�� N PAGE , _J.SLOF._ r r PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PREMIER HOMES, MEEKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, TOMICH/JONES, TORN RANCH, AND GOLDEN STATE DEVELOPMENT) . UPON FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WIN R, WASHBURN NOES: UNCILMEMBERS: -NONE ABSENT: CO CILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUN ILMEMBERS: -NONE City Attorn Harpez advised that in connect' n with this agreement, h has been notified that the el tion will now need to be po tponed to August 15, 1990. requested that the resolution a added to the agenda. MOVED BY STARKEY, S\REBOLUTICN Y BUCK AND CARR D BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD RESOLUTION 9HE AGENDA. MOVED BY WINKLER, SY WASHBURN D CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOL90-71. 0. 90-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY UN L OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POSTPONING A SPECIAL ELECT WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 TO SUBMIT 0 THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTR C THE COMBINED PROPOSITION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX, ES ABLI MING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT, AND INCURRING BONDED IND BTEDNE 34. Recovery of E enditu s for the atement of Weeds. Rubbish. Refuse and Dirt. Community+2evelopm nt Director Gunde an explained this program and the p ocess for the recove of expenditures. The City Clerk eported no written cowmen s or protests. Mayor Washbu opened the public hearing at 0:20 p.m. asking those in fa r of this item to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Was urn asked those in opposition to thi item to speak. Baring no one, the public hearing was c osed at 10:20 p.m. MOVED BY UCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNAN OUS VOTE TO CONF RM THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMIN TRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO PLACE AN ASSESSMENT W H THE COUN TAX ASSESSORS OFFICER TO RECOVER ALL PERTINENT COSTS AND INT EST ACCRUED THEREON. ITEMS 51. Time Extension Request for Tentative Parcel Map 23381 _ Camelot Properties. Community Development Director Gunderman addressed a letter received from Camelot Properties and detailed the current progress with the necessary improvements. He also suggested modification of the timeline for completion of all work. Leonard O'Byrne, Camelot Properties, -advised that he would have no problem with the 30 day review period. He also AcFNnA ITE'J !FO Qac Z OF ��-- PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 19 0 advised that the landscaping work would begin on July 25, but he is concerned with the timing for removal of the tanks'in that he is unsure of the County's processing of the permits. Mayor Washburn advised that he would have no problem with a 90 day extension. City Manager Molendyk inquired how long the County would take to process the permit. Building Manager Shear estimated 30 to 45 days for final *approval. Councilman Buck questioned the delays for the widening of Malaga. Mr. O'Byrne advised that he is ready to proceed, but he would like to discuss with the new owners of the Casino prior to beginning work. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY U TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO AUGUST 28, 1990. BUSINESS ITEMS . Second Reading _ Ordinance No. 897. ating to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act/of 1975. WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDI*ANCE NO. 897: ORDINANCE NO. 897 AN OR INANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLEMENTING THE SURFAC MINING AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 197 . UPON THE FOL WING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCI MBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUE , STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER0 NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS• NONE 53. Second Reading = Relating to the Central MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SE 898. iness Overlay District. TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 898: . 898 AN ORDINANCEZMBTERS: CITY COUNCI OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AMENDING CHA.11.050 REGARD NG THE CENTRAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DIST UPON THE FOLLOWICALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCI BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, TARXEY, WASHBURN NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 54. Plar WINKLER CILMEMBERS: NONE ILMEMBERS : NONE Commission Appointments. Washburn advised that he and Mayor Pro Tem viewed the five applicants for the two Plan ssion seats. He thanked all applicants for had AGEt DA ITEM, NO. � F,:OS� or r CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE C TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVE GUNDERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR//" DATE: JULY 24, 1990 _d SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23381, CAMELOT PROPERTIES The City Council on its June 26, 1990 meeting extended the above referenced project for 30 days. Further extensions of the Tentative Parcel Map is contingent on the satisfaction of the City Council on the progress of improving landscaping and outside storage on the K -Mart site and grading and drainage concerns on the whole site. PROGRESS REPORT Camelot properties has been in contact with the Planning staff and has submitted the attached letter. Outside storage has been eliminated from the back of K -Mart and according to the applicant landscaping contracts have been signed and all landscape improvements will be completed by August 20, 1990. Grading and drainage issues are still contingent upon the development of other sites (i.e. Days Inn, Phase II and the north parking lot). RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the City Council to re -affirm Negative Declaration 87-38 and to extend Tentative Parcel Map 23381 to the August 28, 1990 City Council meeting. /cm AGENDA ITEM NO. ..:I -- PACE Or 10 CAMKOT PROPERTY COUNSELOR$`iNC. P.O. BOX 1149 WILDOMAR, CA 92395 (714)677-9339 July 17, 1990 Mr. Saied Naaseh-Shahry Associate Planner City of Lake Elsinore Re: K -Mart Final Map 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA Dear Saied: This is a written follow-up to my telephone progress reports of last week regarding the K -Mart site. 1. K -Mart has granted a $43,000.00 contract to Landscapte Design, Ontario California for the re -doing of the landscaping. It will be done according to the original approved plans; with the work starting on Mission Trail and proceeding easterly until completed. This work is to be completed by August 20, 1990. 2. Upon the landscaping being completed by K -Mart, the northerly portion of the site will be paved for temporary additional parking. Mr. Rich Williams of K -Mart's regional office has submitted a preliminary plan to you. He is now incorporating your suggested changes. This plan will take care of any concerns regarding drainage expressed by Kevin Shear, in Building and Safety. The scheduled completion date for the additional parking is September 30, 1990. 3. Days Inn has made application for approvals and last week submitted a letter to you re- garding the time frame for the landscaping plans to be submitted. I understand they are on schedule. AGENDA ITEM NO. 53 J C Mr. Saied Naaseh-Shahry Page Two C 4. The status on Phase II (the parcel im- mediately south of K -Mart) is as follows: (a) A permit has been obtained and fees paid to begin the removal process of the gasoline tanks on the corner of Mission and Malaga. This is sched- uled to be completed within 120 days. (b) A grading plan was prepared and sub- mitted some time ago. Finalization of it is presently on hold primarily for two reasons: i) We, along with the Mayor, recently met with the head official of a major bank in regard to locating a branch on the site. The bank is now investigating it with dispatch. In that a bank is a high priority on both our and the City's list, if it committed, we would develop the remainder of Phase II around it. We will keep you and the City Council up to date on this; and, ii) The development of Phase II needs to be coordinated with the renovation of the Sahara Dunes Casino in the areas of the widening of Malaga Street, the installation of sewer, and the pedestrian access. We are not privy to their time schedule; however, on several occasions, both orally and in writing, we have re- quested to meet with the appropriate parties in this regard. To date we have had no reply. We would hope the City would indulge us on moving the dirt stored there for another ninety days so we can await the outcome of what we have discussed above. 5. Mr. Bill Boyer, store manager of K -Mart has AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF___� C Mr. Saied Naaseh-Shahry Page Three A confirmed that all the things he is re- sponsible for, such as moving the storage containers in the rear of the store and other objectionable items outside, have been completed. Thank you. TLO:sjo Very truly yours, CAMELOT PROPERTY COUNSELORS, INC. T�t'� 629�� P_ct_�F. T. Leonard O'Byrne President AGENDA ITEM DJO._D_ PAGE OE—LL_ PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 26, 1990 or Washburn explained that staff would wo a -write the condi and return for review. MOVED BY WASHBURN, BY BU D CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO D�DED TO PROCEED WITH THE RE -WRITE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CON. COMMUNITY OPMENT DIRECTOR GUNDERMAN ADV �HATTHNEECIFIC PLAN ST ORIGINALLY ADVERTISED FOR THIS DATE Wal DRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. 52. Time extension for Tentative Parcel Man 23381 (K -Mart). Proposed Extension for 90 days. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request and some of the problems that have been encountered in working with the applicant thus far. These included poor landscape maintenance, outward appearance of the store, outdoor storage of excess merchandise, etc. For this reason he recommended granting of a 30 day extension with review at that time for further extensions. Leonard O'Byrne, Camelot Properties, representing the applicant advised that they would be agreeable to the 30 day extension subject to review. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME. AUS NESS ITEMS 53. econd Reading = Ordinance No. 895. Re ting to the Zone Change for South Lake Est es Joint Vent e. MOVED BY ST KEY, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT O INANCE NO. 895: ORDINANCE NO. 895 AN ORDINANCE O HE CITY COUNCIL OF HE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZO G 29.5 ACRES L ATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF STONEMAN AND THE S TH SIDE OF T CURRENT CITY LIMITS FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R ) TO SING -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) (SOUTH LAKE ESTATES JO T VEN RE. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL E: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BU , STARKEY, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBER NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMB S: DOMINGUE WINKLER ABSTAIN: COUNCI BERS: NONE 54. Second Readin = Ordinance No. 896. Relating t9/the Lake Elsinore Outlet McArthur/en Group. is Plan - MOVED /BYBK, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINA\LAKE 96: ORDINANCE NO. 896 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OSINORE, LIFORNIA, APPROVING THE LAKE ELSINORE OUTLETPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM. NO. %Z v PAGE OFA r C CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVE GUNDERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 20, 1990 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23381 (K -MART) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a one (1) year time extension on the Tentative Parcel Map that expires on June 26, 1990. Grading, drainage, landscaping and outside storage has been a concern to the City since construction of K -Mart. Staff has had extensive contacts with Mr. Leonard O'Byrne and the K -Mart Corporation. Grading and drainage issues are still unresolved. These issues are a result of grading not in conformance with approved grading plans including off-site grading performed by Camelot Properties. The development of the Days Inn on Parcel No. 3 will solve these issues; however, it will cost the developer extra to correct the drainage problems. Also, illegal dirt piling on Parcel No. 2 is not in conformance with the approved grading plans. Landscaping issues have been discussed with staff. A new water pump has been installed on the Mission Trail property line to provide necessary pressure for irrigation. The applicant claims improvements to the existing landscaping will shortly follow. outside storage of Garden Center has been partially cleaned up; however, staff is not satisfied with the progress. Storage containers in the back of the K -Mart building are expected to be removed by July 15, 1990. Staff site inspections have revealed that one of the containers was removed from site but now it is back on the premises which is in conflict with the agreement reached between the staff and applicant. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Time Extension for a ninety (90) day period extending the Tentative Parcel Map till September 26, 1990. Issues discussed in the Staff Report and the attached letters shall be in full compliance to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director before additional extensions are granted. /cm AGENDA ITEM NO. _h0/ PAGE-1—OF ID 3040 E. OLIVE AVENUE. SUITE 103 FRESNO. CALIFORNIA 93701-1395 May 10, 1990 r` SCOTT A. MOMMER, F.E. PRESIDENT LARS ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS TELEPHONE (309) 485-1300 • FAX (209) 495-0531 — Ktc,L►'dro r. MAY Z 1° Manning. Deot- City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 Attn: Mr. Saied Naaseh, Associated Planner Re Time Extension for Parcel Map No. 23381, Kmart - Lake Elsinore, California Dear Mr. Naaseh, Please find attached herewith a check in the amount of $660.00 for the processing of the Parcel Map extension for the above said map. We have advised the client of his immediate attention to correct the items on your list dated April 24, 1990. We will have the client advise you once he has completed the above said work. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (209) 485-1300. Sincerely, LARS AND SEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. cott A. Mommer President SAM/rka cc: Jack Renauer, Kmart Corporation Ron Rozanski, Kmart Corporation Attachment AGENDA ITEMS NO. 10 /G�. PAGE ! D OFA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditions of Approval Numbers 13, 15 17 23 25 26 29, 39, 42. and 43 for Residential Project 90-10: George Alongi. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: ohn DeGange Assistant Planner APPROVED BY: �%"1 i" /ko Mol' . dyk `City Manager Dave Gunderman Dave Gunderman Comm. Dev. Dir. On July 18, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Residential Project 90-10 subject to 43 Conditions of Approval by a 5-0 vote. DISCUSSION The applicant, George Alongi, is requesting the deletion or alteration of the following Conditions of Approval for Residential Project 90-10: Condition No. 13 - Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street tree list, a maximum of thirty (30) feet apart and at least fifteen (15) gallon in size to meet the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. For all projects where the frontage is along the public right-of-way the applicant is required to plant a street tree at least every thirty (30) feet. This is a standard condition which is designed to create an aesthetically pleasing streetscape for all City streets. Condition No. 15 - A six-foot (61) high wood fence or masonry wall shall be constructed along the side and rear property lines and shall conform to Section 17.14.80 (Fences and Walls), subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. This is a standard condition for all residential projects. Its intent is to provide a standard level of privacy and aesthetics in the residential areas of the City. Condition No. 17 - Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. AGENDA ITEM NO. -wLL — PAGE OF i Page 2 August 28, 1990 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditions of Approval for Residential Project 90-10; George Alongi All projects too small to make park dedications must pay a fee so that smaller projects can collectively make provisions for park space. At the July 18, 1990 Planning Commission meeting the applicant misinterpreted this condition to mean that the applicant must pay a fee to provide parking for projects unable to make such provisions. Condition No. 23 - A revised landscape plan shall be resubmitted to the City's Landscape Consultant for review and final approval shall be by the Community Development Director based on the recommendations of the landscape consultant. If deemed necessary, landscape plans shall go before Planning Commission for final approval. a) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year. This condition was taken from comments supplied by the City's Landscape Consultant. In summary, the comments stated that the landscape plans submitted by the applicant were inadequate. Part (a) of this condition is a standard condition which is designed to ensure that the proposed landscape improvements are completed in the event the applicant is unable to complete them. Condition No. 25 - No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. This is a standard condition designed to prohibit the applicant from constructing the project such that outdoor storage is provided or encouraged. Outdoor storage is considered aesthetically unappealing. Condition No. 26 - Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. a) Treatment over the front exterior door, to the downstairs units, for protection from the elements shall be provided and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Standards for trash enclosure design, location and construction are necessary to provide adequate access for Rodriguez Disposal and to ensure that a certain level aesthetics is maintained. Condition No. 29 - Dedicate additional right-of-way for standard corner cutback for the future curb return at the northwesterly corner of Lot 20. Right-of-way dedication is essential to AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 2 --OF �— Page 3 August 28, 1990 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditions of Approval for Residential Project 90-10; George Alongi fulfill the goals established in the circulation portion of the General Plan. Condition No. 39 - Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. This is a standard condition established by the Riverside County Fire Department to ensure that areas of new development are adequately serviced. Condition No. 42 - Contribute $41.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. All new projects in the City are required to contribute a proportional amount to the Master Entryway Sign Program. Condition No. 43 - Post required Labor and Material Bond and Performance Bond for Public Work Improvements off-site. The use of bonds on Public Works Improvements is a standard condition. The intent of this condition is to ensure that improvements to the right-of-way are completed in the event the applicant for whatever reason fails to complete them. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. AGENDA ITEM NO. — =� P1,c7 3 OF2-- C CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT NO(S) PROJECT APPLICANT PROJECT LOCATION DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION J v! 'o I, the undersigned, hereby appeal the above action of approval/ denial by the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission, for the following reasons (Please cite specific conditions, by number, if appropriate). J.1 -35 - H -V- - L/3 (Attach additional page,".if necessary) j ignature Print Name Address / J City -State -Zip Code Telephone 23 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF C I OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 Planning Division 1. Design Review approval will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. Applicant shall meet all conditions of approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. Structures shall be placed on-site as depicted on plot plan and/or as modified by the Community Development Director or his designee. 4. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans or as modified by the Community Development Director or his designee. 5. Meet all setback requirements. 6. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 7. Applicant is to meet all applicable County Fire Department requirements for fire protection. 8. Applicant shall use roofing materials with a Class "A" fire rating. Roofing material shall consist of random tab three dimensional asphaltic shingles. Roof treatment to be continued over the three garage doors. 9. The project shall connect to sewer if a sewer line is within 200 feet of the project boundary unless it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that this is infeasible. If the project does not connect to sewer, applicant shall comply with the following: a) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a soils report which includes a sewage disposal plan referenced to the grading plan and approved by the Riverside County Health Department. b) Prior to release for occupancy, the developer shall record a notice entitled "Septic System Disclosure and Restrictions" specifying that the property is served by a septic system and that no structure or paving may be placed over the sewage disposal area or the expansion area. A copy of the approved septic system plot plan shall also be recorded along with this notice. A copy of this recorded notice shall be provided to the City for verification. c) An acknowledgment of receipt of this notice by the expected occupant of the property shall also be submitted to the City. 10. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of nine feet six inches by nineteen feet six inches (916" x 191611) of interior clear space. 11. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (31) in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed to meet the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 12. All exterior air conditioning units, electrical boxes or other electrical or mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall be screened, if applicable, screening shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. AGENDA ITEP_"-- PAGE OF�_ r C. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 13. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 feet (301) apart and at least 15 -gallon in size as to meet the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 14. A grading and site drainage plan shall be approved by the Building Division prior to issuance of building permits. 15. A six-foot (61) high wood fence or masonry wall shall be constructed along the side and rear property lines and shall conform to Section 17.14.080 (Fences and Walls), subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 16. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 17. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. 18. Any additional required dedications for public right-of-way shall be provided for on Site Plan. 19. Units located along streets classified as Modified Collector or greater (sixty-six (66) feet wide or greater), shall incorporate dual -glazed windows. 20. All Conditions of Approval shall be attached or reproduced upon page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by Building Division. 21. The addresses (in numerals at least four inches (411) high) shall be displayed near the entrance and be visible from the front of the units. 22. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 23. A revised Landscape plan shall be resubmitted to the City's Landscape Consultant for review and final approval shall be by the Community Development Director based on the recommendations of the landscape consultant. If deemed necessary, landscape plans shall go before Planning Commission for final approval. a) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100$ for material and labor for one (1) year. 24. Approval of this project is contingent upon approval of Zone Change 90-10 by City Council. Building or grading permits will not be issued until this approval is obtained. 25. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 26. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. a) Treatment over the front exterior door, to the downstair units, for protection from the elements shall be provided and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. AGENDA ITEM N-0- PAGE��E +--- r OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 CONTINUED Enaineerina Department: 27. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 28. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 29. Dedicate additional right-of-way for standard corner cutback for the future curb return at the northwesterly corner of Lot 20. 30. Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 31. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 32. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 33. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 34. Reconstruct five -feet (51)of pavement section adjacent to curb on Pottery, replace broken sidewalk, reconstruct curb for new drive approaches and provide new curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement improvements along property frontage on Langstaff. 35. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 36. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). All fees and requirements of encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 37. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 38. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 39. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 40. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans, as required by the City Engineer. 41. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. AGENDA ITEM NO. r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 CONTINUED 42. Contribute $41.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. 43. Post required Labor and Material Bond and Performance Bond for Public Work Improvements off-site. AGENDA ITEfr!_P�O. PAGE OF 1 Planning Commission July 18, 1990 Page 12 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 89-22 CONTINUED ondition No. 56e: Slope ground cover shall be planted per the recommendation of the City's Landsca e Architect. Cc nditi n No. 57: Incorporated into condition 35. Second by 'Gpmmissioner Brinley. Commissioner 'lsey asked for further discussi on condition number 49, reta ing the condition and addin verbiage "color mix shall be s ject to the approval of the Community Development Direct " Commissioner Saatho amended h' motion to include Commissioner Wilsey's omment on ondition number 49, amending said condition t read: Condition No. 49: Add "Col mix shall be subject to the approval the Community Development Director Commissioner Wilsey ask for furt itd iscussion on condition number 53. Commission Saathoff ated that his motion included the deletio of this con Commissioner Gil son inquired about con 'tion number 51, and whether or not he second sentence wa to be retained. Commissioner aathoff responded that the s cond sentence was to remain. her Brinley amended her second toinclude the to the motion. 5-0 At tis time, 10:15 p.m.. the Planning Commission recessed\ At this time, 10:25 p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened. 11. Residential Project 90-10 - George Alongi - Assistant Planner DeGange presented for Design Review a single -story duplex of 2,993 square feet in size and two 3,577 square foot two-story triplexes. Each structure is placed on a 9,000 square foot lot. The project location is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. Assistant Planner DeGange requested that condition number 44 be added, which would read: Condition No. 44: All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of instal- lation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one year. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant, and if there were any concerns. Mr. George Alongi commented on Page 2 of the Staff Report, pertaining to the comments made by the City's Landscape Architect, roofing material, and then commented on the following Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 10: This should be changed to 916" x 19'6" inside measurement. Planning Commission July 18, 1990 Page 13 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 CONTINUED Condition No. 13: If the City wanted me to put the trees 30 -foot apart, they would have 3 trees there, is that what the City wants? Condition No. 14: I would like to see the Planning Commission talk to the City Council and to the Building Department. Drainage across the sidewalk. What they want us to do on these projects is to drain under the sidewalk. Condition No. 17: Park in -lieu fee, where did this come from? Condition No. 23: Landscaping plan coming back before the Commission. I agree with this for larger projects, but when you get down to small projects it is really an overkill. Condition No. 25: I would like the Commission to tell me how we can stop people from outdoor storage. Are we talking before or after? It is something that you can't enforce. Condition No. 26: Trash enclosures are required for eight units and up. I do not have to put trash enclosures in, however, I am going to, but I do not want to be stuck to the City standards on building them. Condition No. 28: I want to go on the record --I extremely resist signing any documents giving away my water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District does not require any water rights in any other area, and they do not require it in Lake Elsinore, neither does the Elsinore Water District. The City of Lake Elsinore said they collect them and turn them over to different water companies, but they have not yet turned one over. Condition No. 42: There is no Resolution to that. There is an Ordinance 16-32-020, which only addresses itself to the type of sign that City Council approve. Minutes of April 23, 1985, page 2 item 9, addresses itself to approval of the type of sign and discussion of a fee for the sign. I believe that the signs will benefit the total community, not just a selected few, and if they are going to benefit the total community then I think the total community should pay for the signs. It should come out of the General Fund or the Redevelopment Fund. Condition No. 43: Questioned the posting of Performance Bond. We are doing street improvement plans, pulling encroachment permits, and submitting liability insurance. Requested this condition be removed. Discussion was held on the above referenced conditions. Commissioner Wilsey commented on condition number 12, suggested adding the following verbiage to the end "if applicable, screening shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director." Commissioner Brinley commented on proposed condition number 44 and this being included as condition number 23.a.; condition number 38, pertaining to location of power poles. Commissioner Saathoff commented on the landscaping plan, and comments from the City's Landscape Consultant. Ai cFdDA ITEi: f'7. pgGrOF Planning Commission July 18, 1990 Page 14 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 90-10 CONTINUED Chairman Brown commented on condition number 43, posting Performance Bonds. If the City has not been requiring Performance/Completion Bonds, for people who work in the public right-of-way, then we should be. Chairman Brown commented on the triplex --second floor unit landing being inadequate; continuation of plant -on mansard roof treatment; extension of eaves; first floor having no protection from the elements; width of window on first floor, and turning the staircase leading to the second floor. Chairman Brown asked for further discussion at the table. Commissioner Brinley stated that the overhang over the door would be an added amenity --providing protection from the elements. Commissioner Wilsey inquired about the difference in elevation --is there a step down onto the roof -top? Suggested incorporating some of the landing area on to the deck area. Mr. Alongi responded that there is a three-inch step down from the living area on to the deck. This could be extended, but the reason why we don't is for security. Chairman Brown commented on the previous design approval; understands concern about L -shaping out the staircase --in lieu of that would much rather see the overhang over the bottom unit; impracticability of increasing the landing, and continuing the roof treatment across the three garages. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Residential Project 90-10 based on the Findings and subject to the 43 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 8: Add "Roof treatment to be continued over the three garage doors. Condition No. 10: Garage shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 916" x 19'6" of interior clear space. Condition No. 12: Add to end of last sentence "if applicable, screening shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director." Condition No. 23a: All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one year. Condition No. 26a: Treatment over the front exterior door, to the downstair units, for protection from the elements shall be provided and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 AGEODA ITEM N'0- PACE: G.PACEI GF r PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Business Item R 90-10 July 18, 1990 PREPARED BY: 9f 171 APPROVED BY: John DeGaifgDav Gunderma Assistant Planner Co Dev. Dir. OWNER APPLICANT Dexter Armstrong George Alongi 305 S. Olive Street P.O. Box 901 Orange, California 92665 Lake Elsinore, California 92330 REQUESTED USE Design Review of two triplexes and one duplex to be built on three separate but adjacent lots (A.P. # 374-071-001, 002, 003). SIZE AND LOCATION The proposed project is one single -story duplex 2,993 square feet in size and two 3,577 square foot two-story triplexes. Each structure is placed on a 9,000 square foot lot. The project location is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING MATERIAL AND COLOR ROOF - Asphalt (Charcoal/Black) BODY - Stucco (Triplex - Light Blue; Duplex - Light Yellow) TRIM - Wood (Off-white) DISCUSSION The location of this project is within a R-2 residential zone and though the proposed structures are permitted in R-2 the lot sizes for this project do not meet lot area requirements. The proposed project does, however, meet lot area requirements for R-3, and because the General Plan designation for this area is High Density a zone change is to be performed for these parcels. Time AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGES OF EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Vacant R-2 High Density North - Multi -Family R-2 High Density Residential East - Single -Family R-2 High Density Residential South - Abandoned R-2 High Density Commercial West - Single -Family R-2 High Density Residential MATERIAL AND COLOR ROOF - Asphalt (Charcoal/Black) BODY - Stucco (Triplex - Light Blue; Duplex - Light Yellow) TRIM - Wood (Off-white) DISCUSSION The location of this project is within a R-2 residential zone and though the proposed structures are permitted in R-2 the lot sizes for this project do not meet lot area requirements. The proposed project does, however, meet lot area requirements for R-3, and because the General Plan designation for this area is High Density a zone change is to be performed for these parcels. Time AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGES OF Business Item R 90-10 July 18, 1990 Page 2 requirements associated with the public notification process have forced the proposed zone change to be scheduled on the following Planning Commission Agenda (August 1, 1990). As a result approval for this project is contingent upon the approval of Zone Change 90-10 (Condition 24). PROJECT CONCERNS The proposed side yard setback for the rear elevation is 5 feet 4 inches. The Zoning Ordinance requires a side yard setback of six -feet. Staff recommends that approval be conditioned upon the applicant meeting side yard setback requirements (Condition 5). The applicant also proposes to use asphalt shingles, staff conditions approval on the use of random tab extra dimensional asphalt shingles (Condition 8). The City's Landscape Consultant reviewed the conceptual landscape plan submitted by the applicant, and commented as follows: 1) Insufficient in detail for acceptance; 2) Should follow the City of Lake Elsinore Landscape Guidelines; 3) Should expand the plant pallets to include a wider variety of species; 4) Should exclude proposed rose bushes for foundation and background plantings; 5) Should separate planting areas from turf areas with a header and this should be indicated on the landscape plans. Staff feels that approval should be conditioned on the applicant resubmitting landscape plans incorporating the comments of the City's Landscape Consultant (Condition 23). If the Planning Commission feels it necessary staff would also recommend that the resubmitted plans go before the Planning Commission for approval. ENVIRONMENTAL Negative Declaration 90-24 has been prepared for this site with the proposed findings that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment or that potential impacts have been mitigated. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission adopt Negative Declaration 90-24 and approve Residential Project 90-10 based on the Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS I. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. If the attached Conditions of Approval are met, the residential development will meet the design ad development standards of Chapters 17.14, 17.28 and 17.82. 3. The project will not have a significant impact on the environment. p,CEKW,. 1ScM PFO. PAGE_ OF'�� REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Separation of Inland Empire Division League of California Cities PREPARED BY: APPROVED BYp �)j/ Vicki Kasad, oRolencjlyX, City Clerk city Manager BACKGROUND: Councilman Bill Franklin from the City of Corona has proposed separation of Riverside County from the Inland Empire Division of the League of California Cities. He feels that there would be better representation for our County through this action. The issue was raised and discussed at the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Conference of Riverside County Dinner hosted by our City on August 8, 1990. The final vote to initiate the action is scheduled for the September 12, 1990, dinner meeting in the City of Perris. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council discuss this action and provide direction for the City of Lake Elsinore's vote on September 12, 1990. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF.J. ORDINANCE NO. 900 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 50 ACRES LOCATED SUCH THAT IT IS SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY IS ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF TRELLIS LANE, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74 FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN. (THE CLURMAN COMPANY ZONE CHANGE 90-11) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION The Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: Assessor's Parcel Number 347-110-022, 347-110-024, 025, 026 from Rural Residential (R -R) to Specific Plan on approximately 50 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such SPD Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. The project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation. 3. The project is consistent with the pattern of recent approvals in the area. by law. SECTION TWO: This ordinance shall become effective as provided AGENDA ITEM 111._,J7 PAGE OF 3 Page 2 Ordinance No. 900 INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 14th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: RUCK, DOP1IN,UEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASNRURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE . COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 28th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGATITY: John Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. _n _ PAGE (;� OF 3 *z Umssta PRIMARY ACCESS PROJECT VICINITY HILLS TO RIVERSIDE 11�I-�_. � .11• E (HIBIT A AGENDA ITEM NO—57 7 PAGE OF_-� c ORDINANCE NO. 901 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 160 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF TUSCANY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND GREENWALD AVENUE NORTHWEST OF CANYON LAKE, AND SOUTHERLY OF DORCHESTER LANE TO R-1 (HPD) [SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -HILLSIDE PLANNED DISTRICT] (NORTH GATE DOWNS - R. BRUCE KEMPER ZONE CHANGE 89-13) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE:OZ NING RECLASSIFICATION The Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: Assessor's Parcel Number 349-250-013, 014, 015, 016 from Rural Residential (2.5 acres minimum lot size) to R-1 (HPD) (Single -Family Residential District -Hillside Planned Development Overlay District) on 160 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such R-1 (HPD) Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. The project zoning is the most appropriate zone for standard single-family residential development. 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the residential zoning in surrounding City developments. 3. The pre -zoning proposal is not inconsistent with the General Plan. by law. SECTION TWO: This ordinance shall become effective as provided A§ENDA ITEM NO, —5 PAGE I OF Page 2 Ordinance No. 901 INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 14th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMIN,UEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 28th day of August, 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF -3 EXHIBIT A p1OTECT ID=ON AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE.1� OF NO. 902 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE RAMSGATE DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City") has previously certified an Environmental Impact Report No. SCH 83071309 (the "EIR") with respect to the Ramsgate Development (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City has caused a Supplemental EIR (SCH 88090525) and an Addendum to the EIR to be prepared which addresses the chages to the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has caused a Negative Declaration 90-6 with Mitigation Measures, to be prepared which reduces significant adverse impacts to levels of insignificance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has previously reviewed the EIR, the Supplemental EIR, the Addendum and the Negative Declaration and has recommended that the City Council (1) certify that the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's CEQA Guidelines; (2) approved the amended Specific Plan for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Environmental documents prepared in accordance with the California Quality Act, and has considered the information contained therein and in the other documents referred to therein; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously certified the Supplemental EIR and the Addendum to the EIR and has made the findings required by Section 1509 (a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and has reviewed the Negative Declaration with its Mitigation Measures, attached hereto as Attachment A. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES ORDAIN THAT: Section J..L Upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission and based upon the findings adopted hereby with regard to the approval of the Project, the City Council hereby (i) finds that the Second Amendment to the Specific Plan for the Project area attached hereto as Attachment B is consistent with the General Plan of the City, (ii) finds that the adoption of the Specific Plan is in the public interest, (iii) approves and adopts the Second Amendment to the Specific Plan, and (iv) approves and adopts the Negative Declaration 90-6 Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Attachment A. Section * This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. AGENDA ITEM NO.,_.5�C PAGE OF� Page 2 Ordinance No. 902 PASSED UPON FIRST READING this 14th day of August, 1990, by the following called vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOPIIN;UEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, NASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 1990, by the following called vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Rasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEAGITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore Gary M. Washburn, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. 5= PAGE OF d AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 POLICY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: "Only those items filed with Secretary 01 tiie Reuevelupment Agency by Noon on Tuesday, prior to the following Tuesday meeting, will be considered by the Agency at said meeting." 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved on one motion unless a Boardmember requests separate action on a specific item. A. Minutes 1. August 14, 1990 — Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. _ I B. Investment Report — July 31, 1990. C. Property Acquisition — Rodriguez Disposal Company. D. Tentative Tract Map 26142 - South Lake Estates. E. Tentative Parcel Map 25717 & Industrial Project 89-12 - Brookstone Development, Inc F. Annexation No. 55 and Zone Change 90-7 - Coastal Valley Development. G. Zone Change 90-10 - George Alongi. H. Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance, 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. BUSINESS ITEMS 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT 7. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S. CLOSED SESSION 9. ADJOURNMENT RECOMMENDATION Approve. Ratify. Approve Staff Recomm. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur with Council Action MINUTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Buck at 9:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER, BUCK ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Roger, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and Clerk of the Board Kasad. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Boardmember Winkler advised that he would be abstaining from vote on item C. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. A. The following Minutes were approved: 1. July 24, 1990 - Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. B. Ratified Warrant List for July 31, 1990. C. Authorized Payment for Lake Management Levee. (Note: Vote on this item was 4 ayes with Winkler abstaining). D. Concurred with Council Action to Deny Conditional Use Permit 90-5 for the Lake Elsinore Christian Fellowship. E. Concurred with Council Action to Approve Tentative Tract Map 25831, Zone Change 90-11 and Specific Plan 89-1 Amendment No. 2 - The Clurman Company. F. Concurred with Council Action to approve Tentative Financial Parcel Map 25638 - Long Beach Equities. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD THE AGREEMENT WITH JOE GONSALVES, LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE AS A BUSINESS ITEM. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 5. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Legislative Advocate Agreement _ Joe A. Gonsalves & Son. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH JOE A. GONSALVES & SON WITH THE CITY COUNCIL TO PAY 50% OF THE COSTS AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO PAY 50%. AGENDA ITEM N0. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - AUGUST 14, 1990 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT None. 7. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS None. 8. CLOSED SESSION None. 9. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 9:32 P.M. ATTEST: VICKI KASAD CLERK OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILLIAM S. BUCK, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO - 3-A-*- AA — • PAGE _OF—C— REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS JULY 31, 1990 LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND 8.517% DAILY 24-HOUR $11,749,000** ** $3,800,000 Held on behalf of the Agency by the Lake Elsinore Public Financing Authority VERNMENT BACKED SECURITIES - NEGOTIABLE FEDERAL HOME MORTGAGE CO. 8.75% 03-16-88 05-01-08 GOV. NAT'L MORTGAGE ASSN. 7.5000 04-10-87 04-10-07 GOV. NAT'L MORTGAGE ASSN. 7.500% 04-28-87 04-28-07 ------------------------------------------------- - AGENCY INVESTMENT TOTAL 12,074,608 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - AUGUST 1990 **Will meet anticipated expenditures 264,899 19,598 41.111 325,608 AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE...... 8.067% $300,000 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE--X-OF---A- REPORT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: PROPERTY ACQUISITION PREPARED BY:r_� APPROVED B C. Ray wood, Administrative on olend Services Director yU City Manager BACKGROUND: The Agency has previously approved the acquisition of the Rodriguez Disposal Property and relocation of the business within the City. An Escrow was opened and is scheduled to close on August 30, 1990. FISCAL IMPACT• The cost of the property to be acquired is $398,000. Additionally, there will be a mortgage loan of approximately $213,000 to Rodriguez Disposal Company for construction on the new site. The loan conditions to be the conditions as a similar mortgage to be paid off on the property being acquired. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency approve conclusion of the Escrow and authorize execution of all documents necessary to complete the transaction. AGENDA it t«:.... , PAGE_jt_OF�_ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 26142: South Lake Estates; a request for aooroval of a 114 lot single-family subdivision. PREPARED BY: ��---� b��` APPROVED BY: Dave Gunderman Saied Naaseh Dave Gunderman Associate Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. APPROVED B' Z" e� >�n n Moe g y) City Manager On August 1, 1990 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-12 and to approve Tentative Tract Map 26142 by a 4-0 vote. DISCUSSION Subsequent to the Planning Commission review of the tentative tract map the applicant has made a few modifications to the map. Staff has concluded that these changes are in substantial compliance with the tentative tract map reviewed by the Planning Commission. The modifications include total number of lots, total number of buildable lots and the circulation pattern. After these changes the revised map still meets the minimum requirements of the Zoning and the Subdivision Ordinances and in staff's opinion they enhance the project. The average lot size has decreased from 8,245 to 8,158 square feet. The total number of lots has increased by one (1); however, since one of the lots eliminated was an open space lot the total number of buildable lots has increased by two (2). The circulation patterns have been modified in two (2) sections of the subdivision. The southeast corner cul-de-sac ("C" Street, Exhibit "A") has been modified to a "knuckle" ("C" Street, Exhibit ''B") to better accommodate the sewer and drainage easements that run through Lots 55 and 56 (Exhibit "A"). This alteration increases the number of lots from 113 to 114. The other revision is in the southwest corner of the project and it involves the elimination of "H" Street (Exhibit "A") and the creation of two (2) cul-de-sacs. This alteration was made to eliminate the open space lot (Lot 113, Exhibit A) which was not large enough for dedication to the City as a park site and was conditioned to be added to the abutting properties. This Condition (Condition No. 41) has been deleted due to the redesign of the project. Condition No. 43.a. has been added to the Conditions reviewed by the Planning Commission and reads as follows: "Lot Number 69 shall be redesigned to be at least 7,700 square feet in area." AGEN DA ITEM NO. ��. P-1- CF- 2_. Page 2 August 28, 1990 Subject: Tentative Tract Map 26142: South Lake Estates It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-12 and approve Tentative Tract Map 26142 based on the Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The project meets the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and R-1 Zoning Standards. 2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's subdivision standards. 3. The proposal, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the area; therefore, it will not create any adverse effect on abutting properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for this type of density of development. 5. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant impact on the environment. 6. The revised Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the Tentative Tract Map reviewed by the Planning Commission. PREPARED REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Man 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12: Brookstone Development Inc • A request to allow for the subdivision of a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) lots and for construction of eleven (11) concrete tilt -up buildings located at the northeast corner of Silver BY2 / Sandra Massa -Lave Consulting Planne APPROVED BY: and Flint Streets. On August 1, 1990, the Planning Commission considered and approved the request to subdivide a 15.29 acre site into eleven (11) industrial lots for the construction of industrial type tilt up buildings which would total approximately 61,000 square feet of leasable space. The project includes the grading of approximately 500,000 cubic yards of soil. The majority of which will be exported off-site. The Planning Commission comments refer to refining the Conditions of Approval. Tentative Tract 25717 Condition No. 6, which referred to the code requirement of a minimum 100' lot frontage, was deleted from the Conditions of Approval because of the integrated nature of the development and the on-site parking provided for each of the developed lots. The conditions established for the Industrial Project delete Condition No. 5, which refers to the minimum lot frontage. Condition No. 21, refers to the landscape condition, additional wording was included to require a fee for the review of the landscape plan. Said fee would he established upon submittal of the plan. The development, while it would be a for -sale project, will have enhanced landscape treatments which would be the responsibility of the entire owners group. The development should provide through the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, for the maintenance of the landscaping throughout the development. This would be accomplished through a landscape easement, to permit maintenance for all the landscaping within the total development. It is requested that the City Council consider the inclusion of an additional condition of approval relative to the landscape AGENDA ITEM NO—11-1 PAGE / OF Page 2 August 28, 1990 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 25717; Industrial Project 89-12 maintenance on the entire site as follows: Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions shall be established for the overall development which defines the responsibilities of the landscape maintenance for the entire development. Said CC&R's shall establish landscape easements to ensure access to all landscaped areas on each lot. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration 89-57 and approve Tentative Parcel Map 25717 and Industrial Project 89-12 based on the Finding and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval which includes an additional condition referring to the landscape maintenance. FINDINGS - Tentative Parcel Map 25717 1. This project as conditioned would not have significant impact upon the environment. 2. The Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned complies with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan and the M-1 Zoning Standards. 3. The project as conditioned, complies with the City's Subdivision Standards. 4. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the findings established in the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66474. FINDINGS - Industrial Project 89-12 1. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The project as conditioned complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and meets all the minimum requirements if the M-1 Zoning District. 3. The project as conditioned complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070 including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the proposed project to insure development of the property in accordance with the Objectives of this Chapter an the M-1 District in which the site is located. AGENDA (TEPA NO. PAGE OF a REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28 1990 SUBJECT: Annexation No 55 and Zone Change 90-7: Coastal Valley Development: a request to annex unincorporated County of Riverside Land into to the city of Elsinore and Pre -Zone the 10.68 acres to allow for commercial uses. PREPARED BYw 'I G9is111PROVED BY: Sandra Massa-Lavitt Consulting Planner r� APPROVED BY:/'�' c�� R¢ Mol¢gdyk City Manager BACKGROUND Dave Gunderman Dave Gunderman Comm. Dev. Dir. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 1, 1990, recommending approval of these proposals by a 4-0 vote (staff report and minutes attached). The Planning Commission held no discussion concerning these issues. RECOMMENDATION it is recommended City Council adopt Negative Declaration 90-22, approve Annexation No. 55 and adopt Resolution No. and approve Zone Change 90-7 and adopt Ordinance No. 0103 based on the Findings. FINDINGS 1. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The proposed project is within the City's sphere of Influence and abuts the City limits. Therefore, the request is a logical extension to the City limits. 3. The project as conditioned will provide the necessary public services to allow development. AGENDA ITE <I N0.3. F' PAGE- ! 01 { REPORT TO CITY COUNCILjREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28. 1990 SUBJECT: Zone Change 90-10: George Alongi; a request to rezone from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3 (High Density Residential) three adiacent parcels located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pottery and Langstaff Streets. (Ordinance No. ) PREPARED BY: T --')p r,a- . APPROVED BY: Dave Gunderman John DeGancj�e Dave Gunderman Assistant Planner Comm. Dev. Dir. i APPROVED BY:�,, ��i d !L-` �✓ Rb Mo City Manager DISCUSSION At the meeting of August 1, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Zone Change 90-10 with a 4-0 vote (minutes and staff report attached). The current zoning for this site and surrounding parcels is R-2 Residential. The current General Plan designation for this area is High Density Residential which corresponds to the zoning designation R-3. Subsequently the rezoning of these parcels from R-2 to R-3 would bring this area into conformance with the General Plan. The applicant intends to construct two triplexes and a duplex on these sites. An Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared for this project which identified no significant adverse environmental impacts. It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative Declarat'orT 24, approve Zone Change 90-10 and adopt Ordinance No. based on the Findings. FINDINGS 1. This request is consist with the Goals, Policies and objectives of the General Plan. 2. This request will bring the zoning for the site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. This request will not result in any significant adverse impact on the environment. fiat.`^a i� ..;-:i ,•2iJ. ..f��3Jj_� REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: PPROVED BY: G•L'?�xC4 Har M. Strozi Dave derman he P1 Aning Associates Comm. ev. Dir. APPROVED BY:, kon MoVendyk City Manager BACKGROUND On October 31, 1988, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (SKR) as an endangered species. Federal law prohibits any "taking" of an endangered species. "Taking" is defined as any activity that would harm, kill or harass these animals. Federal law also provides for a method to allow "incidental" takings subject to a "Section 10 (a)" Permit. This permit process requires the development of a plan which provides for the continued existence of the species. Such a plan, called a Habitat Conservation Plan, must accompany any Section 10 (a) Permit application. DISCUSSION Several documents were adopted on May 22, 1990, and June 26, 1990, by the City Council as part of the Section 10 (a) Permit including: Interim Habitat Conservation Pian, FEIR/FESS for the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan, Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, Memorandum of Understanding, Implementation Agreement, and Allocation of the Take. On June 13, 1989, the City Council', adopted an Urgency Ordinance in response to the listing of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat as an endangered species. This Interim Ordinance has been updated twice since that time. Because the Interim Habitat Conservation Plan has now been adopted, it is necessary to bring the Ordinance into conformance with the adopted short-term Habitat Conservation Plan. The Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance requires the payment of a mitigation fee by applicants for development permits within the boundaries of the Fee Assessment Area unless mitigation fees are $1,950 per gross acre for the parcels proposed for development. However, for single-family residential development, wherein all lots within the development are greater than one-half gross area in size, the mitigation fee is $1,000 per residential unit. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fee Ordinance. 02 U AGENDA ITEM NO. s ---D. PAGE/OF-i- OF—i— 1. 2. ill 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. A G E N D A LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 POLICY OF THE LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM BOARD: "Only those items filed with the Secretary of the Board by Noon on Tuesday, prior to the following Tuesday meeting, will be considered by the Board at said meeting." CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSENT CALENDAR All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved on one motion unless a Boardmember requests separate action on a specific item. A. Minutes 1. Regular Meeting Lake Elsinore Transit System - July 24, 1990. B. Monthly Financial Statement - July, 1990. 1. Warrant List - July, 1990. 2. Statement of Operation. 3. Monthly Performance Report. 4. Operation Summarization - July, 1990. C. Designation of Riverside County Transportation Commission as the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Agency. Resolution No. LETS 90-3. D. Authorization for a RTA/Joint Planning Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS BUSINESS ITEMS TRANSIT COORDINATORS REPORT REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS ADJOURNMENT RECOMMENDATION Approve. Ratify. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Adopt Res. No. LETS 90-3. Authorize Staff to Organize. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JULY 24, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Lake Elsinore Transit System Board Meeting was called to order by Chairman Dominguez at 10:55 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER, ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: General Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and Clerk of the Board Kasad. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. A. The following Minutes were approved: 1. Regular Meeting Lake Elsinore Transit System - June 26, 1990. B. Received and ordered filed the Monthly Financial Statement for June, 1990. 1. Ratified Warrant List for June, 1990. 2. Received and ordered filed the Statement of Operation. 3. Received and ordered filed the Monthly Performance Report. 4. Received and ordered filed the Operation Summarization for June, 1990. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 5. BUSINESS ITEMS None. 6. TRANSIT COORDINATORS REPORT None. 7. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS None. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3- N_ PAGE OF I PAGE TWO - LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 8. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM MEETING AT 10:56 P.M. ATTEST: VICKI KASAD CLERK OF THE BOARD LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM FRED DOMINGUEZ, CHAIRMAN LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM AGENDA ITEM NO. 3AP PAGE., ff, p , LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM 130 SO. MAIN STREET, LAKE ELSINOR E, CA. 92330 (714) 674 -3124 -(714)674-LETS Chairman of the Board: FRED DOMINGUEZ Boardmembers: WILL BUCK BILL STARKEY GARY WASHBURN JIM WINKLER General Manager: RON MOLENDYK General Counsel: JOHN HARPER Clerk: VICKI KASAD Treasurer: TERESA CHERVENY Controller: C. RAY WOOD Coordinator: DELORES MC DANIELS REPORT TO L.E.T.S. BOARD SUBJECT: MONTHLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATE: JULY 31, 19900PPREPAR BY: APPROVED: C- ✓ - APPROVED: KIMBERLY JONES ITEM #1 WARRANT LIST FOR RATIFICATION ITEM #2 STATEMENT OF OPERATION ITEM #3 MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT ITEM #4 OPERATION SUMMARIZATION AGENDA ITEM NO, 3 Q. PAGE _ OF r REPORTING PERIOD: JULY 31, 1990 TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND DIRECTORS LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM THE FOLLOWING LIST OF WARRANTS, DRAWN ON GENERAL DEMAND, IS PRESENTED FOR YOUR RATIFICATION: PAID TO A -Z BUS SALES ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER L. E. AUTO PARTS BIG AL OIL CO. BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOC. PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SEPULVEDA, RAYMOND CA. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOP U.S. POSTMASTER CALIF TRANSIT AGENCY GENERAL TELEPHONE PRUDENTIAL OVERALL CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOP GEARHARTS SERVICE UNIVERSAL COACH PARTS BIG AL OIL CALTIP TREASURER WESTLAKE MEDICAL GROUP CLERK OF THE COURT GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL TELEPHONE A -Z BUS SALES DANIEL'S TIRES PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SERVICE ACCT # WARR # AMOUNT DRIVE SHAFT 110 19922 272.29 JUNE PURCHASES 110 19945 2.04 VEHICLE MAINT. PARTS 110 19967 88.12 FUEL FOR BUSES 111 19934 488.11 TRANSIT ANALYSIS 200 19933 5538.70 UNIFORM SERVICE 330 19974 40.20 SEAT COVERS 2100 19917 495.00 SDI TAX P/E 06/29/90 080 19910 26.56 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 170 19908 2.95 MEMBERSHIP DUES 90/91 180 20081 527.00 PHONE BILLINGS 223 20044 31.47 UNIFORM SERVICE 330 20065 20.10 SDI TAX P/E 07/13/90 080 19933 25.74 LABOR/PARTS V607 110 20162 873.13 PART FOR V609 110 20221 17.06 FUEL FOR BUSES ill 20139 774.96 90/91 PHYSICAL DAMAGE 140 19947 2399.00 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 200 20225 55.00 SMOG EMISSION 200 19951 70.00 PHONE BILLINGS 223 20163 45.51 PHONE BILLINGS 223 19944 21.38 REPAIR PARTS V607 330 20131 285.56 BUS TIRES V609/V610 330 20150 783.36 UNIFORM SERVICE 330 20200 20.10 12,903.34 Respectfully Submitted, C. Ray Wood, Controller AGENDA ITEM NO. I..0 1. . PAGE OF _-S REPORTING PERIOD: JULY 31, 1990 LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM STATEMENT OF OPERATION FISCAL YEAR 90/91 REVENUES/EXPENSES YR TO DATE PERCENT OPERATING REVENUES BUDGET JULY 3480 Passenger Fares 33,500 2,148 2,148 6.4% 3461 Bus Advertising 1,500 0 0 0.0% TOTAL OP REVENUES-P/Y 27,234 2,897 2,897 10.6% NON-OPERATING REVENUES 3329 State Grants 0 0 0 0.0% 3339 County Grants 280,000 0 0 0.0% 3349 Federal Grants 0 0 0 0.0% TOTAL NON -OP REVENUE-C/Y 280,000 0 0 0.0% TOTAL NON -OP REVENUE-P/Y 0 0 0 0.0% TOTAL REVENUE -CURRENT: 315,000 2,148 2,148 0.7% OPERATING EXPENSES 020 Part Time Employees 70,000 5,629 5,629 8.0% 030 Over Time 1,000 0 0 0.0% 065 F.I.C.A. 6,000 431 431 7.2% 070 Work. Compensation 9,500 0 0 0.0% 080 SUI/SDI 1,200 27 27 2.3% SUB -TOTAL: 87,700 6,087 6,087 6.9% SUPPLIES & SERVICES 100 Advertising 1,500 0 0 0.0% 101 Community Promotion 3,000 0 0 0.0% 110 Auto Service 55,000 1,055 1,055 1.9% 111 Fuel,Oil/Lubricants 35,000 488 488 1.4% 140 Insurance -Liability 35,000 4,383 4,383 12.5% 141 Insurance -Casualty 1,000 0 0 0.0% 150 Maint/Repair-Equip 500 0 0 0.0% 170 Postage/Freight 100 3 3 3.0% 180 Publication/Member 200 527 527 263.5% 200 Prof, Other Serv. 82,500 5,539 5,539 6.7% 210 Travel & Meetings 1,500 0 0 0.0% 211 Training/Education 1,000 0 0 0.0% 220 Utilities 0 31 31 0.0% 300 Office Supplies 1,000 0 0 0.0% 330 Special Dept Supply 5,000 60 60 1.2% TOTAL SUPPLIES/SERVICES: 222,300 12,086 12,086 5.4% CAPITAL OUTLAY 430 Furniture/Equipment 0 0 0 0.0% 440 Automotive Equip. 6,000 0 0 0.0% 450 Machinery/Equipment 0 0 0 0.0% TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY: 6,000 0 0 0.0% FIXED CHARGES 540 Depriciation Exp* 73,800 6,150 6,150 8.3% DEPT.OPERATING TOTAL-C/Y 389,800 18,173 18,173 4.7% DEPT.OPERATING TOTAL-P/Y 372,766 18,810 18,810 5.0% NET PROFIT (LOSS)-C/Y (74,800) (16,025) (16,025) 21.4% NET PROFIT (LOSS)-P/Y 499 (15,913) (15,913) -3189.0% *MEMO ONLY - NOT INCLUDED IN TOTALS AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 3 OF 5- F/Y 1990/1991 QTR: IST XX 2ND 3RD 4TH LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM TRANSIT COORDINATOR'S MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT -----------MONTH----------- QUARTERLY TOTAL JULY AUG SEPT. OPERATING DATA Passengers: Regular 1,568 1,568 Elderly 1,241 1,241 Handicapped 369 369 Student 1,749 1,749 Child 756 756 Transfers 159 159 Tickets 91 91 Total PASSENGERS 5,933 5,933 Total Vehicle MILES 11,394 11,394 Passengers Per Mile 1.92 1.92 Total Vehicle HOURS 626 626 Passengers Per Hour 9.48 9.48 FINANCIAL DATA: Operating Expenses 18,173 18,173 Revenues: Fares 2,148 2,148 Other 0 0 Total Revenues 2,148 2,148 Net Expense (Subsidy): (16,025) (16,025) Subsidy/Passenger 3.06 3.06 Subsidy/Vehicle Hour 29.03 29.03 AGENDA ITEM NO. I PAGE OF LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM 130 SO. MAIN STREET, LAKE ELS INOR E, CA. 92330 (714) 674-3124 - (714) 674 -LETS Chairman of the Board: FRED DOMINGUEZ Boardmembers: WILL BUCK BILL STARKEY GARY WASHBURN JIM WINKLER General Manager: RON MOLENDYK General Counsel: JOHN HARPER Clerk: VICKI KASAD Treasurer: TERESA CHERVENY Controller: C. RAY WOOD Coordinator: DELORES MC DANIELS REPORT TO L.E.T.S. BOARD SUBJECT: OPERATION SUMMARIZATION DATE: JULY 31, 1990 PREPARED BY: DELORES MC DANIELS APPROVED: ��a� � Getz, G/ / GENE9AL MAN GER Ridership Operating Days Ridership/Day of Operation Non -Operational Hours Total Fare Revenue Operating Expense Expense/Passenger 5,933 25 237 0 2,148 18,173 3.06 AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 $+'4 PAGE 7- OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT BOARD DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AS THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN (CMP) AGENCY Prepared by: AJC laJaz Dee McDaniels Community Services Supervisor Approved by: Q L. Approved By: 4 Richard J. W ten augh Ro olendyk Community Services Director City Manager/ LETS General Manager BACKGROUND The Congestion Management Plan provisions of AS 471 became effective with the passage of Proposition 111 this past June. Chapter 2.6, Section 65089 of the legislation specifically states in part that "A congestion management program shall be developed..., either by the County Transportation Commission, or by another public agency, as designated by resolutions adopted by the County Board of Supervisors and the city councils of a majority of the cities representing a majority of the population in the incorporated area of the County." At its regular meeting on July 11th, the Riverside County Transportation Commission voted to seek designation as the agency responsible for development of the Congestion Management Plan/Program in Riverside County. As a result, the Commission would like our agency to formally consider the matter and adopt a resolution designating the Commission as the agency responsible for development of the CMP. It is the Commission's intent to formalize working relationships with and participation by the Western Riverside Association of Governments, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and the cities and the County toward development of an effective Congestion Management Plan/Program. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the L.E.T.S. Board of Directors adopt the attached resolution designating the Riverside County Transportation Commission as the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Agency. /mj AGENDAITEM NO• PASE--110F�� RESOLUTION NO. L.E.T.S 90-_Z A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT SYSTEM DESIGNATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO PREPARE THE COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the State Legislature has adopted AS 471 (Chapter 106, Stats. 1989) requiring the adoption of county -wide congestion management programs to coordinate streets and highways transportation planning; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65089(a) adopted as part of AB 471 requires that the County of Riverside and a majority of cities within the County representing a majority of the incorporated population, adopt resolutions directing the Riverside County Transportation Commission to coordinate the development, adoption, and annual updating of a congestion management program within the County. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Lake Elsinore Transit System hereby resolves as follows: That the Riverside County Transportation Commission act as the agency responsible for the development, adoption, and annual updating of the County Congestion Management Program developed pursuant to Section 65088 et seq. of the California Government Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this day of August, 1990, upon the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney Fred Dominguez, Chairman AGENDA 'TEM Wa ��- PAGE OF—,2 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT BOARD DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: RTA/JOINT PLANNING MEETING Prepared by: 1 I''i j'^ Approved By./�_D;l: Rich rd J. W enp ugh Ron)Molefldyk` Community Services Director City Manager/ LETS General Manager BACKGROUND The Lake Elsinore Transit Board authorized a transit study to determine possible improvements, expansion, and/or contract options available to the Board. The completion of the report, coupled with other studies being done through R.C.T.C. and R.T.A., led staff to meet with R.T.A. on several other options. Based on this information, staff is requesting authorization to set up a planning meeting with the L.E.T.S. Sub -committee, staff, and representatives from R.T.A. The intent of the meeting is to explore several ideas and determine mutual support data that can be used in providing improved transportation to Lake Elsinore Valley residents. FISCAL IMPACT The meeting is planning in nature with no fiscal impact to either agency at this point. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Chairman and Board authorize staff to set up a joint planning meeting between R.T.A. staff, and the L.E.T.S. Sub -committee. AGENDA!TEM P.O. �— PAGE:1 O=