The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Agenda Packet 01-09-19901 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. L a k e' Elsinore City Council Agenda 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1990 — 7:00 P.M. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL: "Only those items filed with the City Clerk's Office by Noon, Tuesday, prior to the following Tuesday meeting, not requiring departmental investigation will be considered by the City Council at said meeting". CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS Note: Any person wishing to address City Council on any matter not on the Agenda, must complete a request form available at the speakers podium and submit it to the City Clerk prior to commencement of the meeting. (Comments limited to 3 minutes). PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes a. December 26, 1989 - Regular City Council Meeting. b. December 20, 1989 - Planning Commission Meeting. Building Activity Report - December, 1989. Code Enforcement Activity Report - December, 1989. Structure Abatement Activity Report - December, 1989. Warrant List - December 29, 1989. Proclamation regarding Year of the Oak, 1990. Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits and Related Resolution No. 89-71. Continued from December 26, 1989. Final Tract Map 17413-8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281 -.Century American R.C. Hobbs Co.). A request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map for 144 condominium units on 8.38 acres, located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin Street. Approve. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Rec. & File. Ratify. Approve. Adopt Res. No. 89-71. Approve. Adopt Neg. Dec. 88-41; Approve Vesting Tent. Map 25281, Subj. to Fndgs & Cond. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 51. 52. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 9, 1990 Tentative Parcel Map 25347. - Centex Homes. Re -affirm E.I.R. 88-2 A request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4 lots & Approve for financeing and conveyance purposes, located TPM 25347, on the south side of Mountain Avenue and west based on of Michigan Street. Findings. Abandonment of a Portion of High Street, Between Deny Mill Street and -Country Club Boulevard. Abandonment. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7 Adopt Fndgs; Rancon Realty Fund IV. Approve TPM 24571 & A request to subdivide 22.67 acres into 11 parcelE Approve ZC and to change the zone from the C -P (Commercial 89-7 and Park) District and M-2 (General Manufacturing) Adopt Ord. District to the C-2 (General Commercial District), No. 877. located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. Continsed from December 26, 1989. Ordinance No. 881. Adopt Ord. No. 881. Adoption of an interim ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore expanding the moratorium areas on certain properties around the Lake Perimeter and East Floodplain Planning Area. Tuscany Hills Project - '.Tentative Tract Map Approve 24383 and 25074 thru 25030. Staff Recomm. Adoption of a Traffic Impact Fee. Resolution Adopt Res. No. 90-1 and Ordinance No. 882. No. 90-1 & Ord. No. 882. BUSINESS DISCUSSION ITEMS Industrial Prosect 89-9 - Herron & Rumansoff Adopt Neg. Architects (Archer RoofiS Dec. 89-39; Adopt Fndgs; A request for approval of an Industrial Project & Approve for offices in conjunction with a the roofing IP 89-9, company on 1.16 acres, located on the east side Subj. to of Riverside Drive approximately 150 feet north Cond. of Collier. BUSINESS ITEMS Second Reading - Ordinance No. 878. Adopt Ord. No. 878. Relating to Zone CHange 39-15 - Irvani/Brown. CITY MANAGER C014MENTS CITY COUNCIL C014MENTS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 1989 CALL TO ORDER i11G 1\Cy41G41 VL VY \.rVl�ric 1.1CC�..J!, was GcL11L��,L Vp order p�7 lyla�(�1• Winkler at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Starkey. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner, Planning Manager Thornhill, Engineering Manager O'Donnell and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan Drive, expressed concern with items 9 and 10 on the agenda. He felt that item 9 should be a slope dedication rather than a street dedication. He advised that the owner of the property at 16941 Ulmer has changed since the deed was signed. PRESENTATIONS CEREMONIALS A. Appointment of Central Business District Committee. City Manager Molendyk explained that this committee is the result of Ordinance 875 receiving second reading this evening. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPOINT THE PERSONS TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMMITTEE. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez Councilman Buck D.B.A. Representative Ellen Todd D.B.A. Representative George Alongi Planning Commission Chairman Jeff Brown Architect John Ballew CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further consideration and discussion: Item Nos. 4,6,7,8,9 and 10. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. December 12, 1989 - Regular City Council Meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO - PAGE --�— OF I -- PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: b. December 6, 1989 - Planning Commission Meeting. C. December 13, 1989 - Adjourned Planning Commission Meeting. 2. Received and ordered filed the Animal Control Activity Report for November, 1989. 3. Ratified Warrant List for December 15, 1989. 5. Approved Sale of City Property on Camino Del Norte, and identified as Assessor's :Parcel Number 377-200-016 to Ranel Development Company for $200,000.00 cash with the provision, that purchaser accepts said property with the recognition of a potential lot line adjustment for street realignment. 11. Approved public hearing date of January 9, 1990 for the following: a. Traffic Impact Fee. b. Vestinq Tentative Tract Map 25281 = Century American. A request to accept submittal for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. C. Tentative Parcel Map 25347 - Centex Homes. A request to approve a four (4) lot parcel map for financing and conveyance purposes consisting of approximately 833.3 acres of land. The project is generally located on the south side of Mountain Avenue (extended and west of Michigan Street). ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Award of Contract for Lakepoint Park Athletic Lighting Project to Pacific Electric Compal. Mayor Winkler requested a tentative schedule for work to be completed. City Manager Molendyk advised that the project itself would not take long to complete, however, the poles will be ordered and take approximately 6 to 8 weeks for delivery; and completion should occur in March or April of 1990. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE LAKEPOINT PARK ATHLETIC LIGHTING PROJECT TO PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $191,286.00. 6. Resolutions Initiating the General Municipal Election Process for April 10, 1990 & Establishing Candidate Regulations. Mayor Winkler advised that for this election, the polling hours will be extended one hour to 9:00 p.m. to allow more residents the opportunity to vote. He further advised that this extension of time is only for the April 10 election and will have no impact on other elections in the City. Councilman Dominguez advised that the election filing period will be January 11th to February 1, 1990. Councilman Washburn commented on the cost of the election and the expense of registered voters who do not vote. AGENDA (TEM NO. 1 k 20 PAGE OF�°�`� PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 Mayor Winkler requested that the City Clerk monitor the number of voters who turn out between 8 and 9 p.m. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS 89-69 AND 89-70 INITIATING THE APRIL 10, 1990 ELECTION PROCESS. RESOLUTION NO. 89-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,, CALLING AND ' iii V INN ivvIiCL ur •.L -hr; rice uU-LN(;'- Ur' A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES AND REQUESTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONDUCT SAID ELECTION. RESOLUTION NO. 89-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990. 7. Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits - Resolution No. 89-71. City Manager Molendyk requested that this item be continued for two weeks. It was the consensus of Council to continue this item as requested. 8. Resolution of Intention to Vacate a Portion of High Street. North of Mill Street and South of Country Club Blvd. - Abandonment 89-2. Resolution No. 89-72 Councilman Buck inquired whether access to individual properties had been reviewed with regard to this item. Engineering Manager O'Donnell advised that even with this closure two accesses remain from each side. Mayor Winkler clarified that this action is to set the public hearing; and further consideration will be given at the public hearing. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-72 AND SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 9, 1990. RESOLUTION NO. 89-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A STREET EASEMENT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. 9. Acceptance of Additional Street Dedication and Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights - 17455 Sunnyslope. Councilman Buck requested that the words "Street Dedication" be changed to "Slope Easement" as discussed by Mr. Knapp. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ACCEPT THE DEEDS WITH THE WORDING CHANGE AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN BUCK. 10. Acceptance of Slope Easement and Water Right Dedications from AGENDA ITEM NO. '- PAGE OF(�)-- PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 Single Family Residences at 16941 Ulmer and 404 West Flint. Mayor Winkler requested staff comments on concerns expressed by Mr. Knapp. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that he just became aware of this property ownership change this afternoon, and needs to Cl�leck it further. City Attorney Harper clarified that this; does not create a problem with recording the document, and if further consideration is necessary, the recorded document would be superseded and thus a moot point. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ACCEPT THE DEEDS FOR RECORDATION. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Tentative Parcel Map 24571. & Zone Change 89-7 - Rancon Realty Fund IV. A request to subdivide 22..67 gross acres into 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres, and to change the zone from C -P (Commercial Park District) and M-2 (General Manufacturing District) to C-2 (General Commercial District). The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the request and advised that the concern with regard to signage raised by the Planning Commission has been addressed. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. asking those in favor of this project to speak. The following person spoke: Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, representing the applicant, advised that they are in agreement with all recommended conditions of approval and offered to answer questions. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:24 p.m. Councilman Buck suggested that a condition be imposed with regard to traffic problems at the freeway off -ramp. He suggested that they fund or bond for two lanes at that off -ramp. He further suggested that landscaping of the freeway off -ramp area be funded by this project. Councilman Washburn expressed concern with the two year time frame on the tentative map, and suggested that they be given one year unless extended. He further commented on the proposed conditions as follows: Condition #12.b. - He suggested grass or turf be required to eliminate confusion. Condition #19 - Median should be as required by the City and the City deal directly with Caltrans. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that an agreement has been reached with Caltrans already, however, Caltrans does control all construction on Highway 74. Condition #20 - Questioned the sidewalk specifications to utilize seven feet. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that this area would include landscaping and AGENDA ITEM NO. - -` G` PAGE _J.-- • '� PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 allow for the possibility of a meandering sidewalk. Community Development Director Gunderman further explained that the design would need to be worked out with regard to access points and level of usage. He suggested that this be considered at the time of Design Review. Conditions #42 - Suggested addition of Condition requiring a Class II Bicycle Lane. C"Vunc iimGina .:uuiail iain Z -':'g a_ -t GZS . nclusi%-an vl LGl�ulL ClllGllV LVL G� landscaping plan to address the freeway off -ramp and the freeway along the back of this development. City Manager Molendyk advised that this will require.that the City work out an agreement with Caltrans. Mayor Winkler questioned the maintenance of this type of landscaping. Staff explained that this could be done through the City-wide Lighting and Landscaping District. Community Services Director Watenpaugh further explained that we are working on a master plan to address freeway landscaping and alternatives. Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with making a decision for Caltrans. City Attorney Harper explained that the City can condition for landscaping of a specific area subject to future agreement with Caltrans. Council discussion ensued with :regard to freeway and off -ramp landscaping and alternatives to accomplish it. City Manager Molendyk clarified that we can condition the developer to participate and establish an agreement with Caltrans at a later date. He clarified that the condition can be done pursuant to a City agreement with Caltrans. Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, commented that they want a pleasing appearance as well, however this is only the Parcel Map and Zone Change and the landscaping could be addressed at a later date. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO ADD A CONDITION #42 REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A CLASS II BICYCLE LANE. (This motion was not voted on because it was decided to continue this item to January 9, 1990.) Fred Crowe, expressed concern that with the Caltrans frontage it may be difficult to provide a safe bicycle lane. Community Development Director Gunderman expressed concern with this type of condition, as it may cause difficulty for recordation of the map. He suggested continuance of the map, prior to placement of such a restrictive condition. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS. 32. Zone Chancre 89-15 & Commercial Project 89-5 - Doctor H. Irvani Kenneth Brown. A request to change the zoning from C -P (Commercial Park District) to C-2 (General Commercial District), and a request to construct a 21,000 square foot, two-story commercial building on a 1.1 acre site, located at the northwest corner of Riverside Drive and Joy Avenue. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised that it is a departure from the nautical theme utilized in most areas along Riverside Drive. AGENDA ITEM O• — l;Cti� PAG E OF PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. asking those in favor of this request to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this request to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:03 p.m. Councilman Buck advised that he is concerned with the revised '� .. l_ � 7�� .y L L_ `' i t foot L i_ ' ' GI to p-' W1111.11 kI-.L.L C:5 �L:J 1GC�l. �i..ieL. CLl,in for loaulll�j' ctLI%A unloading or turn around access to prevent blocking the driveway. Councilman Washburn expressed concern with crime and the potential hiding places. He suggested lighting and a block wall fence with wrought iron behind the development, but left the final consideration to the Sheriff's Department and staff. Councilman Dominguez inquired whether it would be appropriate to condition the developer to install a burglar alarm as part of the project. City Attorney Harper advised that the City presently does not have an ordinance under which such a condition could be imposed. Councilman Starkey commented on the insurance breaks available to businesses that have burglar alarms and the benefit such an ordinance might be. City Attorney Harper advised that there is no statute which would address burglar alarms. He further advised that prior to imposition of such a condition the City's ordinance would need to be amended. He commented on the difficulty in enforcement after the building has been built and inspected. Councilman Dominguez suggested requiring the appropriate wiring for an alarm system at the time of construction Mayor Winkler acknowledged the lack of grounds for imposition of such a requirement, however, he requested that an ordinance be prepared as soon as possible to address this concern Councilman Washburn questioned Condition #23.b. and expressed concern with the removal of mature trees for this development. He recommended requiring ;specimen trees or 24" box trees; with item 23.e. being changed from 1115 years" to 115 years". Councilman Washburn requested inclusion of a Condition #61 requiring a Class 2 Bicycle Lane. City Manager Molendyk suggested with regard to the trees, that Council consider development of guidelines with regard to sizes of trees and coverage reasonable growth time frames. Councilman Washburn suggested that the verbiage 117 years or less" be used for growth coverage. Councilman Starkey commented that he was pleased with Condition 49 which requires money toward placement of the traffic signal at Joy Street and Riverside Drive. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD CONDITION #61 REQUIRING THAT THE APPLICANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A CLASS 2 BICYCLE LANE. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CHANGE CONDITION #23.b. FROM 15 GALLON TREES TO 24" BOX TREES. 1 % AGENDA ITEM NO--4� PAGE (C,J� PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 MOVED BY WASHBURN TO CHANGE CONDITION #23.e. FROM 15 YEARS TO 7 YEARS OR SOONER. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH WASHBURN CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO CHANGE CONDITION #23.e. FROM 15 YEARS TO 10 YEARS. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD CONDITION #62 TO REQUIRE A REAR WALL TO BE REVIEWED BY THE SHERIFF AND STAFF FOR APPROPRIATE MATERIAL TO INCREASE mcnrT*e+rz+ Tm zv +m MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-33, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findings _ Zone Change 89-15 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the General Plan. 3. Government Code Section 65860 requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. 4. Although he proposed zoning is inconsistent with the proposed General Plan Designation a finding of associated environmental impacts can not be made. Findings _ Commercial Project 89-5 1. The project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. 2. If the attached Conditions of Approval are met the project will meet the design and development requirements of Chapters 17.18, 17.38 and 17.82 of the Municipal Code. 3. Approval of Commercial Project 89-5 is contingent upon approval of Zone Change 89-15. 4. Negative Declaration 89-33 has been prepared for this project based on the findings that no environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-5, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning Divisions Conditions 1. Approval of Commercial Project 89-5 is contingent upon the approval of Zone Change 89-15. 2. Design Review Approval for Commercial Project 89-5 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year from the date of City Council approval. 3. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented within the project design in all phases and/or adhered to strictly. 4. Full compliance of all Conditions of Approval shall occur, to the satisfaction of the City, prior to the AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 6. All required off -.site improvements shall be completed in accordance with improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 7 . All s.L i ii�j��ive7�iE n i.5 �iidii It=i;uiiti.z uc; i.eu ds indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform with the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 8. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or his designee. 9. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 10. A revised plot plan and elevations shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Departments by the applicant prior to Building Division issuance of permits which reflects all conditions of approval. This revised plot plan shall become the approved plot plan only upon the review and approval by the Community Development Director. 11. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provision of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 12. All undeveloped and/or construction areas associated with he site shall be maintained in a safe and neat manner at all times. 13. Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday to protect adjacent occupants from unreasonable noise and glare associated with construction. 14. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 15. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. 16. No roof ladders shall be permitted. 17. All mechanical and electrical equipment of the building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF ;;L ZL, PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 18. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the building. 19. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. Mailboxes shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the approval of the L....7 LL. /9 �.....___��1__ 7 pvS x.41 ."-. ci v i�:.e GtYau t.LLG 1. Vl- l.111J - f�1�'velVplllent Direc:Lur or his designee. 20. Brick pavers or texture pavement treatments shall be laid in bank designs and shall be located at the driveway approaches and crosswalks. 21. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major commercial uses. Placement, design and quantity shall be indicated on the final landscaping plan, and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 22. Project must meet all requirements of Cal -Trans. 23. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for a $100.00 per plan fee, and the Community Development Director or his designee. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and at least 24" box in size, as approved by the Community Development Director. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (611) high and six-inch (611) wide concrete curb. d) Planting within fifteen feet (151) of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (3611). e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in ten years. Irrigation and ground covers shall also be provided. f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g) The Landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year. AGENDA fTEM{� NO- PAGE a PAGE_ OF. PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k) Use plant materials for ground cover rather than lava rock. 1) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 24. All exterior on -rite lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the architecture of the building. 25. Any security lighting located on-site shall be ornamental and shall be shown on building plans, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 26. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent colors, materials and specifications which will enhance the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and approved by the :Planning Commission. All signage including free-standing signs shall be by City Permit and in conformance with the approved Master Signage Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of each sign. 27. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of -the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water -_ District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 28. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official. 29. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection and shall include any additional requirements requested by the Fire Marshal. A fire detector check assembly shall be required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. 30. Only Class "A" faire retardant roofing materials are to be used. 31. Meet all requirements of the Riverside County Health Department. 32. Meet all State handicap requirements. 33. Parking stalls shall be double -striped with four -inch (411) lines two -feet (21) apart. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE � � OF PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 34. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all internal one-way drive aisles. Engineering Department: 35. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 36. Construct all public works iLLo�.; �,v aNNic�veu street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12), which must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to approval of final map (L.E.M.C. 16.34). 37. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil; engineer and improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department standards and City Codes (L.E.M.C. 12.04 and 16.34). 38. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works off-site improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 39. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 40. Dedicate a corner cut-back at the northerly corner per Riverside County Standard 805. 41. Dedicate 20 foot along southeast property line for additional right-of-way for Riverside Drive. 42. Dedicate 3 foot along southeast property line for additional right-of-way for Joy Avenue. 43. Submit a letter of verification "will -serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to applying for building permits. 44. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 45. Pay all Capital.Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 46. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through site or provided for by a method approved by the City Engineer. 47. Applicant shall construct a catch basin on Joy Street and provide storm drain system in Joy Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 48. Driveway on Riverside Drive shall be right -turn in and right -turn out only. AGENDA ITEM NO - I PAGE OF �- PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 49. Applicant shall contribute $3,946.00 for the traffic signal a Joy and Riverside Drive per Resolution 83-49. 50. Applicant shall meet all requirements of Cal -Trans and obtain any necessary permits from Cal -Trans. 51. Contribute $6,987.00 for the design and construction of half (1/2) a median on Riverside Drive along abutting property line. 52. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to building permit, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.20). 53. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 54. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County fire protection. 55. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by City Engineer. 56. Enter into a subdivision agreement with the City for off-site improvements an post appropriate bonds. 57. Contribute $124.00 for the City-wide Entry Sign Program. 58. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 59. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from adjacent property owners prior to grading permit. 60. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello Rood Community Facilities District (CFD) for infrastructure improvement and operation and maintenance for the West Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement District. 61. Design and construct a Class II Bicycle Lane 62. Provide rear block wall fence to be reviewed by Sheriff and staff for appropriate material to increase visibility and tenant safety APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-15 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 878: ORDINANCE NO. 878 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 1.24 ACRES :LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND JOY AVENUE, FROM C -P (COMMERCIAL PARK DISTRICT) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) (ZONE CHANGE 89-15 - IRVANI/BROWN). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL 'VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER AGENDA (-TEM NO. ` �. PAGE QFlql— PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 33. Tentative Parcel Mazy 25157 - Bainbridge Investments, Inc. A request to create five (5) parcels from a 5.4 net acre site ranging in size from .49 acres to 2.04 acres at the northwest corner of Riverside and Lakeshore Drives. The site is zoned Neighbonccrod Commercial Community Development Director Gunderman explained this request. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. asking those in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 25157 to speak. The following person spoke: Saeed Shahidzadeh, Bainbridge Investments, advised that they are in concurrence with all proposed conditions of approval and offered to answer questions. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:24 p.m. Councilman Washburn questioned the variable between two year time limits vs. one year. Community Development Director Gunderman explained that Design Review cases are 1 year and Parcel Map cases are 2 years under the Subdivision Map Act. Councilman Washburn commented on the Planning Commission's concerns with regard to traffic, and suggested that Condition #27 be amended with "..approval subject to engineering analysis." Community Development Director Gunderman suggested the Condition "No other access from Riverside Drive except as shown, unless approved in the design review process," as this would provide some flexibility. Councilman Buck felt that the plan is too restrictive, particularly with a 270 foot strip of frontage with no access. Council discussion ensued with regard to access to each lot; necessary reciprocal easements and alternatives for approval. Community Development Director Gunderman clarified options of 1) deny the map or 2) send the matter back to the Planning Commission with direction or indications of the concerns and request reconsideration. City Attorney Harper further clarified the legal options. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO REFER THIS ITEM BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW. City Manager Molendyk requested clarification with regard to major intersections and Council's direction; he suggested that the optimum usage of major intersections be considered. Council concurred. 34. a. Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. Addendum to the Canyon Lake Hills Final Environmental Impact, Report, Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Conservation Agreement and 1989 Development Agreement. Resolution Nos. 89-73 & 89-74 and Ordinance Nos. 879 & 880. AGENDA ITEM NO, I 'GS ' PAGE -D— OF PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 b. Tuscany Hills Tentative Tract Map Nos. 25074, 25075, 25076, 25077, 25078, 25079, 25080 and 24383. Planning Consultant Stroz:ier detailed the proposed Plan and its prior considerations. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:47 p.m. asking those in favor of these items to speak. The following people spoke: Chris Webber, Hunsaker and Associates, commented on the hillside portions of this Plan, as well as the school and park sites, extensive landscaping plan and other proposed amenities. Chris Taylor, Homestead Development, stressed the extensive requirements and increased standards imposed on this development by Homestead, over and above the City's requirements. Alan Manee, representing -the Grande Vista Partnership (adjacent Property Owner), felt that this is a long time development which is worthy of City support. He requested clarification with regard to bicycle lanes, timing for CC & R's, maintenance of open space areas and the project's impact on the Kangaroo Rat Habitat. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. No one spoke. He offered the applicant an opportunity to respond to Mr. Manee's comments. Chris Taylor advised that there would be a bicycle lane on the arterials, the CC & R's have already been approved and recorded, and the open space will be maintained as directed by the City Council. He further advised that the Department of Fish and Wildlife has determined that they will not be significantly impacting the K -Rat Habitat. Mayor Winkler closed the :public hearing at 9:03 p.m. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS :RECESSED AT 9:03 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECO19VENED AT 9:15 P.M. Councilman Washburn commented on the size of this project and expressed concern with voting on this project at this meeting, because concerns with lot size, cul-de-sac length, setbacks, etc. have not been resolved. He felt that the plans should be updated to current standards. City Attorney Harper commented that specific items can be reviewed and suggested that Council provide specific items in writing to staff for review. He also suggested the possibility of a Study Session or a Council Sub -Committee for further review. Mayor Winkler agreed with the Sub -committee approach because of the large volume of information and the short time to review it. He also stressed concerns with minimum lot size. Councilman Washburn advised that he would like the project to move forward as soon as possible and offered to serve on a Sub -committee. Councilman Buck concurred with the Sub -committee approach and expressed concern with lot sizes, setbacks and parking problems. AGENDA ITEM '40- --� �— PAGE ILL Oc �� PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 City Attorney Harper suggested that the Council reopen the public hearing and continue it to a date certain. Mayor Winkler commented that he would be comfortable with a Sub -committee of Washburn and Buck and suggested that they try to review it prior to the next Council Meeting and return with further recommendations. Mayor Winkler reopened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS �'�/1TT T/1 /\/11TT TITTT��'11 TTTT (1 TTTTTITITA T/� TA ITT T'. T1Tf3393 7�� T+�� + V V t L 1 V 11\ \J 1J 1111 V 11J.:iL91"11`I V 1 V U AlY V Alm L 7, 1' y V ALY 1J 1C1'1 r LitC 1 CJ K SUB -COMMITTEE OF COUNCILMEMBERS BUCK AND WASHBURN FOR FURTHER REVIEW. 35. Cottonwood Hills Annexation Conducting Authority Hearing. Resolution No. 89-75 and Agreement with Riverside County Road Department. City Manager Molendyk explained that this is the next procedural step for completion of the annexation. Special Projects Engineer Keith explained that original concerns with Railroad Canyon Road improvement had been resolved as they relate to this annexation. City Attorney Harper detailed the public hearing process and formal Council action necessary. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:45 p.m. asking those in favor of this annexation to speak. The following person spoke: Mike McGee representing Pardee Construction, explained that this is the final administrative action required of the City for annexation. He also explained the agreement which deals with a condition imposed by L.A.F.C.O. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 9:46 p.m. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-75: RESOLUTION NO. 89-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS COTTONWOOD HILLS ANNEXATION 88-1 ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND DETACHED FROM ORTEGA TRAILS RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT. 36. Brighton Homes Development Agreement. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JANUARY 23, 1990. 37. Community Facilities District 88-3. Resolution Nos. 89-76 & 89-77. Bond Counsel McFarlin reminded Council that the Resolution of Intention for this District was adopted at the November 14, 1989 meeting. He detailed the improvements to be financed through the district. He then advised that an additional four AGENDA ITEM NC. J...r`�'�--=.�. ;'AGE �%� PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 weeks is needed to determine the densities and unit counts for the tax rate spread, and :recommended that this hearing be opened and continued to January 23, 1990. The City Clerk reported one written comment as follows: Please record me as against the establishment of the Community Facilities District 88-3 of the City of Lake Elsinore and against -the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness. I am a property owner of the above mentioned property (A.P. #389050015-9) and wish to be count -ed as against- this. I am unable to attend hearing. Sincerely, Nancy Torn 33051 Machado Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 Mayor Winkler opened the :public hearing at 9:52 p.m. asking those in favor of Community Facilities District 88-3 to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. No one spoke. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS HEARING TO JANUARY 23, 1990. 38. Railroad Canyon Road Benefit Reimbursement District. Special Projects Engineer Keith advised that after the adoption of Ordinance 870 on November 14, 1989, he received three letters, which were included in the agenda packet. He discussed alternatives to reapportion the assessments, as well as limitations on those alternatives. The City Clerk reported no additional written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:59 p.m. asking those in favor of the reimbursement district to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 10:00 p.m. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO GIVE FINAL APPROVAL TO ORDINANCE 870 ALLOWING FOR NEGOTIATION OF CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY FRIEDMAN HOMES AND HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT, SUBJECT TO CITY .ATTORNEY APPROVAL. BUSINESS/ DISCUSSION ITEMS 51. Industrial Prosect 89-10 - Lytle Creek Partners. A request to construct two (2) additional single story self storage buildings consisting of approximately 18,810 square feet, located at the northeast corner of Collier Avenue and Riverside Drive. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this requested and prior work with the applicant to resolve concerns. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DO:MINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-40, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findings AGENDA ITEM NO.1\ CX, PAGE DE-=� PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 1. The proposed request will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The site for the proposed request is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use. 3. The proposed buildings continue the same design as the existing units and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Municipal Code. i. C-- diti�i S` an -3 safeguards pursilant t0 Sectlorl 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the Planning District in which the site is located. AND APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-10 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planninar Division Conditions 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. Applicant shall file a Lot Merger application with the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of building permits. The Lot Merger shall be recorded prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits a Landscape Plan must be approved by the Community Development Director, and shall contain revisions as stated in staff's discussion. 4. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the plans date stamped October 25, 1989, and/or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 6. Meet all Riverside County Fire Department requirements. 7. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of fixture. No wall pack units shall be permitted. 8. A final grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the Chief Building Official. 9. Applicant shall submit a revised Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan, which shall include 100% watering coverage. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect. The plan shall be approved prior to the Certificate of Occupancy and the release of utilities and include the following: a) At the southeast property corner and heading AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE,�,v! O�� PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 west, the second and fifth trees shall be changed to 15 gallon Platanus Acerifolia. b) Beginning at the southwest property corner heading north, the first and fourth trees shall be changed to 15 gallon Platanus Acerifolia. c) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for iTiatericai a,,d iduu Lor vile (I) year. 10. A six-foot (61) high decorative split face wall with one -foot (11) of wrought iron treatment at the top shall be erected. This wall will be along the south and east property lines and will tie to the existing adjacent wall. A decorative slumpstone fence will screen the west elevation. 11. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. Engineering Department Conditions 12. All public works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 13. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 14. Construct half -street improvements to match existing roadbed section on Riverside Drive north of Collier Avenue. Replace existing curb and gutter on Riverside Drive where is has been damaged and broken by overgrowth of weeds (T.I. = 6.-0). 15. Construct all off-site approved street plans Plans must be approved Engineer prior to issu Elsinore Municipal Cod public works improvements per (Municipal Code, Title 12). and signed by the City ance of building permit (Lake 16.34). 16. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Standards, lates=t edition and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 17. Pay all Capital :Improvement and Plan Check Fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.,34, Resolution No. 85-26). 18. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Code 16.20). 19. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water agency, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. AGENDA ITEM PAGE OF., PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 20. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 21. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 22. All compaction reports, grade certificutionsf monument certifications ( with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 23. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 24. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside county Fire protection. 25. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 26. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a .drainage easement. 27. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 28. Applicant shall contribute $103.00 towards the City Master Entryway Sign Program. 29. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works improvements as established for the project by the City Engineer. 30. Developer shall construct energy dissipators and erosion control facilities for on-site storm run-off outletting into drainage easement. 31. Developer shall contribute $1,300 towards the design and construction of traffic signal at Collier Avenue and Riverside Drive. This development will increase traffic at intersection at least one percent (1%) and should contribute one percent (1%) towards construction. BUSINESS ITEMS 52. Second Reading _ Ordinance No. 871. Relating to Zone Change 88-11. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 871: ORDINANCE NO. 871 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 9.12 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRANKLIN STREET, WEST OF AVENUE 6, FROM C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) AGENDA ITEM NO. --I ti�� PAGE OF PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 88-11). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL 'VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 53. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 872. Relating to Zone Change 88-12. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 872: ORDINANCE NO. 872 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 18.11 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POTTERY STREET, EAST OF RANCHO STREET FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 88-12). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 54. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 873. Relating to Zone Change 89-11. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 873: ORDINANCE NO. 873 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 57.0 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO STREET AT THE TERMINUS OF PRINCO STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R -R) TO R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 89-11). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL 'VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 55. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 874. Relating to Zone Change 89-5. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 874: AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 ' G PAGE OF PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 ORDINANCE NO. 874 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 72.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO AT THE TERMINUS OF LINCOLN STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R -R) TO R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 89-5). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN/ rr 'V'71iv i�i�Ln NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 56. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 875. Relating to the Central Business Overlay District. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 875: ORDINANCE NO. 875 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 17.11 CENTRAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DISTRICT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Molendyk advised that staff is working with the Consultant for the Police Study and a proposal should be received by the January 9th City Council Meeting. He also advised that on January 10 our new Police Officers will be on duty. He further advised that following two incidents over the Christmas weekend arrests of the responsible parties had been made involving 7 people. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Washburn commented on a high speed chase that occurred on Christmas Eve. Councilman Starkey wished everyone a Merry Christmas and reminded the community of the New Year's Eve party sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce at the Lake Community Center. He also congratulated Pat Starkey on obtaining her first driving license and wished everyone a Happy New Year. Councilman Dominguez requested that at the next City Council meeting a time line for the police study be provided. Mayor Winkler requested that staff develop an alarm ordinance as soon as possible. He advised that the next Public Safety Committee meeting would be held on January 6, 1990, and advised that Nick Nash will be representing the Brookstone area on the Committee. AGENDA ITEM NO.L-2-' -\, PAGE OF PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 CLOSED SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:10 P.M. ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE JIM WINKLER, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO. �{ PAGE T MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1989 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER ALT 7:00 P.M. f: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mr. Fred Crowe. ROLL CALL: }, PRESENT: Commissioners: Brinley, Gilenson, Saathoff, Wilsey and Brown ABSENT: Commissioners: None Also present were Community Development Director Gunderman, Planning Manager Thornhill and Assistant Planner Fairbanks. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Minutes of December 6, 1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Brinley abstaining Motion by Commissioner Brinley to approve Minutes of December 13, 1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Gilenson abstaining PUBLIC COMMENTS There being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed the PUBLIC COMMENTS section. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners (Continued from November 29, 1989) - Planning Manager Thornhill stated that staff is requesting this item be continued to the meeting of January 3, 1990, to allow the subdivider an opportunity to redesign the project in response to public testimony taken at the November 29th meeting. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract Map 23988 to the meeting of January 3, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 5-0 2. Tentative Parcel Map 25347 - Centex Homes - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4 lots for financing and conveyance purposes, located on the south side of Mountain Avenue (extended) and west of Michigan Avenue. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Tentative Parcel Map 25347. Mr. Larry Truman, Butterfield Surveys/The Keith Companies, representing the applicant stated that he would answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 25347. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. There being no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25347 based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 , AGENDA iTEIM hO. l PAGE -.I/-- OF-.! " Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 2 ,f 3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281 - Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented A request for the subdivision of air space into 144 condominium units on approximately 9 acres. The project is located at th�_, southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25288. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, gave a brief background report on the proposal; stated that they concur with staff recommendation and would answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. There being no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council reaffirmation of Negative: Declaration 88-41 and approval of Vesting Tentative Tract: Map 25281 based on the Findings and subject to the 37 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 4. Conditional Use Permit 89-8 Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a Conditional Use Permit application for condominiums. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak: in favor Conditional Use Permit 89-8. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, stated that they concur with staff recommendation and would answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Conditional Use Permit 89-8. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Discussion was held on condition number 6, pertaining to the CC & R's and when they would be put in place; formation of a homeowner's association for maintenance of common area land- scaping, and this being included in the CC & R's; formation of a silent homeowner's association prior to the recordation of map to prevent future right-of-way and ingress/egress problems, or an agreement with the developer for those types of things. Motion by Commissioner Brinley to reaffirm Negative Declaration 88-41 and approve Conditional Use Permit 89-8 based on the Findings and subject to the 6 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendment: Condition No. 6: "CC & R's shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director and City Attorney, prior to the recordation of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281." second by Commissioner Wilsey Approved 5-0 AGENDA ITEM NO. ,� . PAGE 4 OF 7 Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 3 5. Conditional Use Permit 89=6 - Herron & Rumansoff - Planning Manager Thornhill presented 6 Conditional Use Permit to operate offices and concrete tile storage for a roofing company. The project is located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 125 feet northr;of Collier Avenue. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Conditional Use Permit 89-6. Mr. Russell Rumansoff, of Herron & Rumansoff, stated that they concur with staff recommendation, but would like clarification on condition number 7. Planning Manager Thornhill responded that condition number 7 pertains to some work related activity that is occurring on the premises, and this was for storage only. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Conditional Use Permit 89-6. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Discussion was held on the tennis court type screening and if any other material was considered; type of material to' be stored and its height with regard to fencing and height of fencing; condition number 1, not allowing any storage until the entire site is completed --no interim storage. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to adopt Negative Declaration 89-39 and approve Conditional Use Permit 89-6 based on the Findings and subject to the 12 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 6. Development Agreement - Brighton Homes - Community Development Director Gunderman stated that due to continuing negotiations with Brighton Homes, staff requests this item be continued to January 3, 1990. Motion by Commissioner Brinley to continue the Development Agreement for Brighton Homes to the meeting of January 3, 1990, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER BUSINESS ITEMS 1-4 CONCURRENTLY. Assistant Planner Fairbanks presented the following proposals as listed: Single -Family Residence 317 Scrivener Street - Select Housing - A request to construct a 1,366 square foot single -story manufactured dwelling and a 380 square foot attached garage, positioned on a 9,000 square foot, lot located 60 feet south of the southwest corner of Scrivener Street and Pottery Street. Single -Family Residence - 319 Scrivener Street - Select Housing - A request to construct a 1,902 square foot single -story manufactured dwelling on a 9,000 square foot lot, located southwest of the corner of Pottery and Scrivener Street. Single -Family Residence - 1507 Sumner Avenue - Select Housing - A request to construct a 1,801 square foot single -story dwelling on a 8,250 square foot lot, located on the northwest corner of Sumner Avenue and Townsend Street. AGENDA ITEM NO. I'6 PAGE ✓ .OF Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 4 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES: 317 & $19 SCRIVENER; 1507 SUMNER; 320 LEWD SELECT HOUSING CONTINUED �r Single -Family Residence - 3A Lewis Street - Select Housing - A request to construct a 1,1321 square foot single -story dwelling situated on a 9,000 square foot lot, located at the southeast corner of Pottery and Lewis Street. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Brad Pomeroy, questioned the condition on masonry walls for corner lots, condition number 15 on 320 Lewis, 319 Scrivener and 1507 Sumner, and the ten -foot dedication on 319 Scrivener and 320 Lewis, condition number 25 and 26 respectively. Considerable discussion was held on masonry walls for corner lots and fencing; the ten -foot dedication, conditions 25 and 26, and moving the house 'toward the rear of the property; sewer connection, and the material to be used for support pier foundation. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to approve Single -Family Residences at: 317 Scrivener; 319 Scrivener; 1507 Sumner, and 320 Lewis based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 AT THIS TIME, 7:55 P.M., THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECESSED. AT THIS TIME, 8:02 P.M., THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECONVENED. 5. Industrial Project 89-9 - Herron & Rumansoff - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a request to construct a single 1,818 square foot building on 1.16 acres. The project is located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 125 feet north of Collier Avenue. Planning Manager Thornhill requested that one additional tree be planted adjacent to the building, utilized posted rendering to illustrate location, and this tree shall be selected from the City's Street Tree List. Chairman Brown asked if' there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Russell Rumansoff, of Herron Rumansoff, commented on condition number 7, project connecting to sewer, and requested that they be allowed to install and use a septic system for approximately two months. In discussion with staff they have indicated that sewer will be installed approximately mid -year 1990, and we anticipate the project to be completed about May or June, 1990. Mr. Rumansoff then commented on condition number 24, pertaining to construction of the Arroyo Del Toro Channel and drainage easements, and requested that they be allowed to work with staff, between now and the City Council hearing, on this. Chairman Brown commented on condition number 7, recommending that language be added that the applicant shall connect to sewer within 30 days of: it reaching 200 feet of his property, and posting security to ensure compliance. Commissioner Gilenson recommended that the standard language for septic system -be added to condition number 7; the standard language for landscape bonding be added as condition number 8.a; commented on condition number 24, pertaining to drainage easements and who determines what is reasonable and necessary. AGENDA ITEM NO. I'b PAGE 7 OF Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 5 f INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-9 - HERRON & RUMANSOFF CONTINUED Commissioner Brinley comme.hted on the screening of air con- ditioning equipment and recommended that the standard language for screening of said equipment be added as condition number 8.b. Chairman Brown commented on the overhang and starkness of wails and carrying the same color theme around the building with a band. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-39 and approval of Industrial Project 89-9 based on the Findings and subject to the 24 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 7: "Project must connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of appli- cant's property, and applicant shall post security to ensure compliance. Prior to issuance of building permits applicant shall submit a soils report which includes a sewage disposal plan approved by Riverside County Health Department." Condition No. 8.a: "All landscape improvements to be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and re- leased at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/ac- ceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for one year. Final Landscaping Plans for the entire project shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Landscape Architect and the Community Development Director. One (1) additional tree to be provided adjacent to the building along the west elevation." 8.b: "All air conditioning equipment and other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be roof mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall be screened. second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 6. Residential Project 88-5 Revised - Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented an application to consider Minor Design Review for a 144 unit apartment complex, which was approved by City Council on March 14, 1989. The revised project contains only minor differences from the original; however, now, the project is proposed to be converted to condominiums. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, gave a brief background report on the proposal; stated that they concur with staff AGENDA ITEM ,NSD. PAGE CF Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 6 f RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 88-5 REVISED -1- CENTURY AMERICAN CONTINUED V recommendation except for condition number 25, pertaining to the fireplaces and requested that this condition be deleted. Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 25, stating that he would prefer to see the fireplaces remain; whether or not the proposal would connect to sewer, and that the standard - lanquage =or Bewer-connection be added to condition number 39. Commissioner Brinley commented on the metal carports, and suggested that the carports be wood with texture. Chairman Brown stated that since the carports are going to be painted and textured metal, would like to see them tiled, Met -tile. Discussion ensued on the roof pitch needed for proper drainage; material to be used for carport structures, and parking structure plan to be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Commissioner Wilsey commented on whether or not this is a phased project, and erosion control planting to be provided for all undeveloped pads. Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 17, pertaining to the type of barrier to be provided; condition number 18, pertaining to all sound barriers should be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director or his designee; applicant providing automatic sprinkler system for landscaping and this added as numer 24.b. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to re -affirm Negative Declaration 88-41 and approve Residential Project 88-5 Revised, based on the Findings and subject to the 52 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 18: "All sound barriers recommended above should be continuous structures without gaps or gates and should be constructed of a material that is impervious to noise (e.g. earthern berm, concrete block, stucco -on -wood, one-fourth inch (1/4" plate glass, or any combination of these materials, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee." Condition No. 24.b: "Automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for landscaping." Condition No. 25: "Final elevations and floor plans shall reflect second floor fireplaces as ap- proved in Residential Project 88-5." DELETED. New Condition 25: "Parking structure plan, carports and garages, will to be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval." Condition No. 39: "Submit a letter of verification to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to applying for building permit. Project shall connect tc sewer." AGENDA ITEMNIO. PAGE 6 OF—� Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 7 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 88-5 REVISED - CENTURY AMERICAN CONTINUED Condition No. 53: "Any pads that are not developed within 30 days after rough grading shall be provided with temporary planting and irrigation." second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 5-0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Community Development Director Gunderman stated that the Draft Elements of the General Plan have been submitted to the Planning Division and have been disseminated to all departments and agencies. We will have comments returned to the consultant by January 15, 1990. We are probably looking at Planning Commission Meetings beginning in April on the General Plan Program. On behalf of the Planning staff we would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissioner Wilsey Nothing to report. Commissioner Gilenson Machado and Lakeshore, northeast corner, the street was cut back and widened, did we have any input on the stop sign? This is a traffic hazard as the stop sign is not easily visible, can we ask the County to correct? Community Development Director Gunderman responded that we will look into this and report back. Commissioner Brinley. Wished staff, City Council Happy New Year. ('I Commissioner Saathoff and everyone a Merry Christmas and a Wished everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Chairman Brown Nothing to report. There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff, second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary Approved, Jeff Brown Chairman AGENDA ITEM NO. —I `� '' .- PAGE= OFe� REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Building Activity Report, Morith vi ii Cc bliiuC 1987 Z4PREPARED BY APPROVED BY D Community Develop eft Director City Manage Dave Gun an Ron Molendyk DISCUSSION• Attached is the Building Activity Report which also includes information for year-to-date and last twelve (12) months for comparison. RECOMMENDATION• Receive and file. AGENDA {TEM NO. N PAGE OF C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E DIVISION OF BUILDING AND SAFETY ACTIVITY REPORT - December 1989 NEW 4 - Single Family Residence .......................... $ 424,000 0 - Duplexes - Bldgs - 0 Units - 0 ................. 0 0 - Multiple Family - Bldgs - 0 Units - 0 .......... 0 3 - Commercial ....................................... 879,167 0 - Industrial ....................................... 0 0 - Mobile Home Installations ........................ $ 0 ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS 19 - Residential ...................................... 63,400 6 - Commercial ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,500 2 - Industrial ..................................... 1,500 1 - Mobile Home ................... .................. 6,000 9 - Swimming Pool/Signs/Blockwall/Misc. .............. 58,600 2 - GRADING .......................................... 32,000 ANNUAL COMPARISON CURRENT YEAR PRECEDING YEAR No. Permits Valuation No. Permits Valuation Month of: December 46 $ 1,514,167 62 $ 723,135 Calendar Year: 1095 $53,203,100 1174 $56,327,863 Last 12 Months: 1095 $53,203,100 1174 $56,327,863 Plumbing Permits: 22 20 Electrical Permits: 25 32 Mechanical Permits: 16 10 Description Owner Valuation NEW SINGLE FAMILY 17455 Sunnyslope Avenue Hartzheim 136,000 32965 Serena Way Jeffries 121,000 312 Lewis Hommel 85,000 388 Avenue 3 T. Gennusa 82,000 NEW COMMERCIAL 31772 Casino Brookstone Dev. 572,167 75 Summerhill Drive Homestead Dev. 214,000 75 Summerhill Drive Homestead Dev. 93,000 AGENDA ITEM NO "- PAGE ), QF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 2 1990 SUBJECT: CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1989 PREPARED BY: Communif� Development City Manager Director DISCUSSION Attached is the Code Enforcement Activity Report for the month of December, which also includes information on the previous month and year-to-date. RECOMMENDATION Receive and file AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DIVISION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY REPORT - DECEMBER, 1989 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA FTEM N0.-� PAGE, ❑�= CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR -TO MONTH MUN'TH DATE COMPLAINTS: Resident Complaints 40 48 682 Staff Initiated Complaints 25 22 371 Total Complaints Received 65 70 1053 Total Violations Corrected 43 81 863 REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES/DIVISIONS Animal Control 1 2 3 Building & Safety 2 ,3 5 Business Licensing _ _ 0 4 _ 4 Health Department _ 0 —0 0— Public Works 9 3 12 Sheriff's Department __14 6 - 20 Water Department J 2 0 2 COURT CASES: Court Hearings (Disputed Citations) 2 4 78 Violations Corrected 0 2 16 NUSIANCE ABATEMENT: Cases Set for Nuisance Abatement Hearing _ _ 0 4 21 Total Abatement Completed 0 4 17 TOTAL CASES CLOSED: 71 105 942 AGENDA FTEM N0.-� PAGE, ❑�= REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: January 9 1994 SUBJECT: Structure Abatement Activity Report - December 1989 PREPARED BY •,o APPROVED BY : l -'�' Community Devel65'f}nent Director city' manacfer Dave Guncf Prman Ron Molendyk DISCUSSION• Attached is the Structure Abatement Activity Report which contains information on monthly activity and the number of properties involved in the abatement program and their status. RECOMMENDATION• Receive and file. AGENDA ITEM NG, i __� , _ \ PAGES„ OF)" C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E DIVISION OF BUILDING AND SAFETY ACTIVITY REPORT ON STRUCTURE ABATEMENT - DECEMBER 1989 New structures in abatement ................. Properties currently being demolished........ Total structures being rehabilitated ........ Structures at Intent Notice ................. Structures at First Notice .................. Structures at Second Notice ................. (For addresses of properties see attached sheet) Current Previous Month Month 0 3 1 0 9 9 8 7 5 3 3 4 STATUS OF STRUCTURE ABATEMENT PROGRAM TO -DATE Total structures that have been demolished by owner......... 46 Total structures that have been rehabilitated ............... 24 Structures demolished by the City ........................... 4 Total structures in the abatement program ................... 99 AGEND ITEM NO. — PAGE __!— OF J LAKE ELSINORE PAGE NO. 1 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-062 DATE 12/29/89 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV, NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ACE LOCK & KEY 17644 AMBER AIR CONDITIONING 17783 ARBOR PRO TREE SERVICE i7784 ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CO. 17785 AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 17786 BALLEW 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. 1778 BIG AL OIL CO.. 1778 THE BRAUN CORP. 17789, PAM BRINLEY 17794 BROTHERS TOWING 17791 JEFF BROWN 17792 B.S.I. CONSULTANTS, INC. 17793 WILLIAM S. BUCK 17794 _vi C.S.M.F.O. 1990 SEMINAR 1779E CALIF. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATI 17796 CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMEh 1777 CALIFORNIA STATE COMPENSATIO 17797 CALIFORNIA STATE COMPENSATIC 17798 TERESA CHERVENY 17799 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY, INC. 17800 CONTINENTAL PACIFIC BATTERY 17801 COOL RADIATOR 17779 AG DA ITEM NO. ! PACE LAKE ELSINORE PAGE NO. 8 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-058 DATE 12/29/89 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK IOUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION I ACCOUNTCHG'D ;NV. NO. AMOUNT NO. I AMOL.NT DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE FRED DOMINGUEZ E.V.M.W.D. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY ELSINORE OFFICE PRODUCTS ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER CO. FIRST TRUST BANK FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO. G. M. C. CONSTRUCTION G.T.E. CALIFORNIA INC. TONY GILENSON GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS GRAYNER-ROGERS ENGINEERI��dG HEWLETT PACKARD CO. HINCKLEY & SCHMITT ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST VICKI LYNN KASAD RONALD F. KIRCHNER KOBATA ASSOCIATES, INC. LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FRIEND LAKE ELSINORE AUTO PARTS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 178021 17803 17804 17805 17806 17807 17773 17808 17809 17810 17811 17778 17812 17813 17814 17775 17815 17816 17817 17818 17819 17772 AGENDA ITEM d. +j PACE_�� OFtZ: LAKE ELSINORE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-062 PAGE NO DATE 12/29/$9 OUCHER NO. PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN pFSCR!PTiON ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO, AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT LAKESIDE CHEVROLET, INC. 17820 5.76 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 17642 69.00 MORROW PLUMBING 17821 6.78 N. B. S. / LOWRY 17822 3500.00 COUNTY OF ORANGE 17823 165.00 P. E. R. C. 17SE4 234.00 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 17825 691.80 PRICE SECURITY SYSTEMS 178226 2287.25 QUEENS R. V. SUPPLIES 17827 42.90 RIGHTWAY 17828 _ 170.6E RIVERSIDE COUNTY FEDERAL 1777S 2666.00 BILL SAATHOFF 17829 150.0[ SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 17830 52.9E SAMPSONIC 17831 1216.94 KEVIN SHEAR 17832 57.3 SUN TRIBUNE 17833 24,0( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17834 1552.11 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 17835 9469,8! STANDARD INSURANCE 17836 14,4( SILL STARKEY 17837 300.0( STOCKWELL & BINNEY 17838 30.6( HARDY M. STROZIER, INC. 17839 9948.21. AGENDA ITEM O. PACE CF LAKE ELSINORE PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-062 DATE 12/29/89 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV. NO. J AMOUNT I NO. AMOI NT TEMECULA VALLEY PERSONNEL i THOMAS TEMPS RUSSELL TOURVILLE CONSTRUCTI UNITED STATES POSTMASTER UNITED STATES POSTMASTER VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. (GARY WASHBURN RICHARD WATENPAUGH AL WILSEY JIM WINKLER RAY WOOD ASSOCIATES THE NEWS WILDAN ASSOC. _n REDLANDS CAMERA ROBERT L. DE WITT HOME VIDEO AMERICAN RED CROSS CROSS STATE ELECTRIC, INC THE REGENTS-UNIVERSITY-CALI C.E.G.A. WORKSHOP 1990 S.C.M.A.F.-SOUTHERN CALIFOR CORONA-NORCO INDEPENDENT 7840 .7841 17842 17843 17777 17844 17845 17846 17847 17848 17849 17850 17851 17852 17853' 17854 17855; 1785G 17857, 17858 17859 17860 AGENDA ITEM ;O. �r PACS OrY_._ LQ LAKE ELS I NORE � PAGE NO. 5 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-062 DATE 12/29/89 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG-D INV. NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVIC 17861 293.25 (BUILDERS EMPORIUM 177801 28.80 'n ,Nl�A ITEM 140. PAGE 1 LAKE ELSINORE PAGENO. 6 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-062 DATE 12/29/89 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. ❑E$CFIPYfON I ACCOUNT CHG'D INV, NO. AMOUNT NO. I AMOUNT RECAP BY FUND GENERAL FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND LIGHTING/LANDSCAPE DISTRI PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FUN L.E.T.S. FUND -Ti 100 110 130 221 450 RITTEN REPAID CCRUED OTAL RE -PAID 83917.53 .00 80.79 .00 27.30 ENDA ITEM N . � PAG -c OF 1485_ .6c 84025.6E .00 232564.24 RITTEN 1073S7.9'c 14806.5 16804.7E 89s3.2( 616.1! WHEREAS, several species of our native oak trees do not seem to be regenerating in their native habitat; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the environmental benefits of native oak trees in our communities; and WHEREAS, the City's native oak trees represent a positive spirit of interconnection to our communities and their cultural heritage; and WHEREAS, the City's native oak trees represent a source of educational exploration for the youth of our communities; and WHEREAS, the City desires to promote conservation, restoration and management of our native oak heritage; and WHEREAS, through focus on public education and _coordination between the private sector, interested groups and other government agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on this 9th day of January, 1990, does hereby proclaim and designate the year of 1990 as the "YEAR OF THE OAK" in the City of Lake Elsinore. JIM WINKLER, MAYOR AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OP_2� Board of Directors PRESIDENT Jane Hagedorn To the Honorable Mayor and City Council, Past Presutent. Sacramento Tree Foundation Exec. Dir. American Lung Assn. of Sacramento VICE PRESIDENT The California Oak Foundation has embarked on a 1990 Dr. Norman Pillsbury Chair, Department of Vatura/ "Year of the Oak" campaign as an effort to stimulate statewide Resourres Cal Pali, State Universitv interest in California's Oak Heritage. The Foundation is seeking TREASURER resolutions from city and county agencies around the state to join Ray Tretheway in concert with the California State Legislature in support of the Program Director Sacramento Tree Fourdation ii " Year of the Oak. SECRE-ARY Ginger Strong In addition to local and collective adoption of resolutions, the Arbonst Cin of Visalia Foundation is working on a variety of activities to take place during Norma Mandrel[ Assam 1990 to focus public attention on oaks and to accomplish much President San Diego Peoplefor Trees needed restoration, conservation and education. The program Austin B. Carroll areas for the "Year of the Oak" reflect those on the Foundation SocletY alrArbonr culturr itself and include: Janet Santos Cobb Assr. General.Manager. PublICAffairs East Bas Regional Park District Hon.Iarry Kapiloff Judge. Siperior Court San Diego Andy Lipkis Presidenr. The Tree People. Los Angeles Michael T. Mahoney President. Golden Cli.b Environmental Semites. Urban Forests• Consultant Pam Muick Oak Researcher, Oak Hardwood Policy Comm. Callforn a Native Plant Society Dr. Isabel Wade President. Urban Resources Sistems San Fraticuco Charles Warren Consultant former legislator and Past Chair, President's Council on Environmental Qua/in, Advisory Council Charles Warren chair Nancy Burnett Oak WoodlandAdvocaie Joseph Edminston Direetor. Santa Monica .Mountains Consetwanev Mel Lane Publisher, Sunset Magazine Hon. Dan McCorquodale Senator, Chair Comm. on Natural Resources Steve McCormick Direcroc Caitfornia Vazure Conservancy Hon. Ken Maddy Senator, Senate .Minoriry Leader Larry Orman £serumr Director, Greenbelt Alliance Harold Walt Chair, California Board of Forestry STAFF CONSULTANT Sbaron Johnson Educator and Writer PROGRAM COORDINATOR Karen Leigh o Urban and wildland plantings, many in concert with public agencies and other groups; o Establishment of a community oak registry; o Creation and implementation of new educational programs for elementary schools; o Broad media coverage; o A variety of new oak publications. We are inviting your participation and urge you to proceed with adoption of a "Year of the Oak" resolution. Enclosed please find a copy of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 60, adopted June 26, 1989. Due to the broad interest throughout the state in oak woodlands, the state resolution has a particularly rural inclination. Please take note that the Foundation includes urban plantings, in fact, we feel that oak trees, as members and neighboring elements of our communities, deserve special attention. In addition to the copy of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 60, you will find enclosed here a draft proclamation which applies to an urban setting. Sincerely, Michael Mahoney Member - California Oak Foundation Board of Directors ENCLOSURES 909 12th street, Suite 125, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916)448-9.19.7 j -r AGENDA ITEM NO. _ �P PAGE 0 F: Q, REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: JANUARY 9, 1990 SUBJECT: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS AND RELATED RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION PREPARED BY: ! APPROVED BY: �14LLe� Y QfDORNELL RON KIRCHNER SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES APPROVED BY:( /_ �ON MCfLENDYA' CITY MANAGER BACKGROUND The City commissioned our contract traffic engineer, Warren Seicke, to perform a traffic and engineering study to review and establish speed limits on city streets. SUMMARY The Traffic and Engineering study was performed in accordance with Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The Traffic Committee of the City has reviewed the report and concurs with its findings. Through adoption of this study and resolution, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. FISCAL IMPACT At this time, the cost for replacing some speed limit signs and maintaining our speed limit signs is unknown. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends acceptance of this Speed Survey and Adoption of the Urgency Resolution attached. Authorize the City Clerk to certify the original copy to the Court file. AGEN'DA !TE&1 N0. � PAGE OF The existing and recommended speed limits are: EXISTING AND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS EXIST RECOM SPEED SPEED STREET LIMITS LIMIT LIMIT Avenue Six Franklin St. to Mill St. NP 30 D Casino Dr. Franklin St. to Malaga Rd. (E.C.L.) NP 40 D Chaney St. Collier Av. to Hill Av. 35 40 I C-.a—j, c+ u; 1 1 ev t.n T.AkAshore Dr_ 35 30 D rJ4aiw+ Collier Av. Central St. to Minthorn St. 45 45 NC Corydon St. W.C.L. to Mission Trail 45 45 NC Franklin St. Main St. to Conklin Av. 25 25 NC Franklin St. Conklin Av. to Avenue Six NP 30 D Graham Av. Lakeshore Dr. to Lindsay St. 25 35 I Graham Av. Lindsay St. to Main St. 25 30 I Grand Av. Machado St.. to Riverside Dr. 35 45 I Grand Av. Ortega Hwy. to E.C.L. 40 45 I Gunnerson St. Riverside Dr. to Lash St. (S.C.L.) NP 35 D Joy St. Machado St. to Riverside Dr. 25 30 I Lakeshore Dr. Robb Rd. to Clement St. (E.C.L.) 45 45 NC Lakeshore Dr. Wise St. (W.C.L.) to Riverside Dr. 40 45 I Lakeshore Dr. Riverside Dr. to Manning St. 35 45 I Lakeshore Dr. Manning St. to Wilson St. 45 45 N. Lakeshore Dr. Wilson St. to Townsend St. 35 45 I Lakeshore Dr. Townsend St. to Graham Av. 35 35 NC Lakeshore Dr. Graham Av. to Main St. 25 35 I Lakeshore Dr. Main St. to Country Club B1. 35 35 NC Lakeshore Dr. Country Club B1. to Railroad Cyn. Rd. 35 40 I Lincoln St. Machado St. to Riverside Dr. 25 35 I Machado St. Lakeshore Dr. to Grand Av. 45 45 NC Main St. I-15 Freeway to Sumner Av. 25 35 I Main St. Sumner Av. to Lakeshore Dr. 25 30 I Minthorn St. Collier Av. to Spring St. NP 45 D Mission Trail Railroad Cyn. Rd. to Malaga Rd. 40 40 NC Mission Trail Malaga Rd: to Olive St. 40 45 I Mission Trail Olive St. to Corydon St. (S.C.L.) NP 45 D Mountain St. Avocado Way to Robb Rd. NP 30 I L Pottery St. Chaney St. to Lewis St. NP 30 D Pottery St. Lewis St. to Langstaff St. NP 30 I Railroad Cyn. Rd. Mission Tr./Lakeshore Dr. to 1000 ft. e/o Grape St. 35 35 NC Railroad Cyn. Rd. 1000 ft. e/o Grape St. to E.C.L. 45 45 NC Robb Rd. N.C.L. to Lakeshore Dr. NP 45 D Spring St. Minthorn St. to Graham Av. NP 35 D ABBREVIATIONS: W.C.L. = West City Limit E.C.L_ = East City Limit N.C.L. = North City Limit S.C.L. = South City Limit NP = No Posted Limit NC = No Change Recommended D = Decrease Recommended I = Increase Recommended AC-�2MA ITEM NO. RESOLUTION NO. 89_71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR CERTAIN STREETS WHEREAS, prima facie speed limits have been established on certain designated portions of City streets by various actions of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, those actions were supported by traffic engineering survey data demonstrating that said speed limits were the most appropriate to facilitate the orderly and safe movement of traffic; and, WHEREAS, signs have been properly posted and maintained by the Director of Public Services giving notice of said designated speed limits; and, WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Municipal Code sets forth said designations; and, WHEREAS, this resolution hereby repeats Resolution 87-34 and, WHEREAS, Section 10.20.030 of said title provides for the designation of prima facie speed limits by resolution of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council's wishes to reaffirm the aforementioned established speed limits by adoption of such a resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, does hereby find, declare, determine and direct as follows: 1. That the prima facie speed limits shall be as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof upon those streets or portions of streets indicated in said Exhibit. 2. That the Director of Public Services shall place and maintain signs and markings sufficient to notice of said speed limits. AGENDA ITEM NO. —I— PAGE OF J _, RESOLUTION NO. SPEED LIMITS W.C.L. = WEST CITY LIMIT N.C.L. = NORTH CITY LIMIT E.C.L. = EAST CITY LIMIT S.C.L. = SOUTH CITY LIMIT AGENDA ITEM P -O. PACE- OF '� RECOM. C', 171r. T n STREET LIMITS LIMITS Avenue Six Franklin St. to Mill St. 30 Casino Dr. Franklin St. to Malaga Rd. (E.C.L.) 40 Chaney St. Collier Av. to Hill Av. 40 Chaney St. Hill Av. to Lakeshore Dr. 30 Collier Av. Central St. to Minthorn 45 Corydon St. W.C.L. to Mission Trail 45 Franklin St. Main St. to Conklin Av. 25 Franklin St. Conklin Av. to Avenue Six 30 Graham Av. Lakeshore Dr. to Lindsay St. 35 Graham Av. Lindsay St. to Main St. 30 Grand Av. Machado St. to Riverside Dr. 45 Grand Av. Ortega Hwy. to E.C.L. 45 Gunnerson St. Riverside Dr. to Lash St. (S.C.L.) 35 Joy St. Machado St. to Riverside Dr. 30 Lakeshore Dr. Robb Rd. to Clement St. (E.C.L.) 45 Lakeshore Dr. Wise St. (W.C.L.) to Riverside Dr. 45 Lakeshore Dr. Riverside Dr. to Manning St. 45 Lakeshore Dr. Manning St. to Wilson St. 45 Lakeshore Dr. Wilson St. to Townsend St. 45 Lakeshore Dr. Townsend St. to Graham Av. 35 Lakeshore Dr. Graham Av. to Main St. 35 Lakeshore Dr. Main St. to Country Club Blvd. 35 Lakeshore Dr. Country Club B1. to Railroad Cyn. Rd 40 Lincoln St. Machado St. to Riverside Dr. 35 Machado St. Lakeshore Dr. to Grand Av. 45 Main St. I-15 Freeway to Sumner Av. 35 Main St. Sumner Av. to Lakeshore Dr. 30 Minthorn St. Collier Av. to Spring ST. 45 Mission Trail Railroad Cyn Rd. to Malaga Rd. 40 Mission Trail Malaga Rd. to Olive St. 45 Mission Trail Olive St. to Corydon St. (S.C.L.) 45 Mountain St. Avocado Way to Robb Rd. 30 Pottery St. Chaney St. to Lewis St. 30 Pottery St. Lewis St. to Langstaff 30 Railroad Cyn. Rd. Mission Tr./Lakeshore Dr. to 1000 ft. e/o Grape St. 35 Railroad Cyn. Rd. 1000 ft. e/o Grape St. to E.C.L. 45 Robb Rd N.C.L. to Lakeshore 45 Spring St. Minthorn St. to Graham Av. 35 W.C.L. = WEST CITY LIMIT N.C.L. = NORTH CITY LIMIT E.C.L. = EAST CITY LIMIT S.C.L. = SOUTH CITY LIMIT AGENDA ITEM P -O. PACE- OF '� PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this by the following vote: 4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: day of , 1989 JIM WINKLER, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTOF.NEY AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF �_ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: JANUARY 91 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP 17413 - 8 r PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: O'DONNELL RON KIRCHNER SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES APPROVED BY: RON MOLENDYK CITY MANAGER BACKGROUND Tentative tract Map 17413, Revision 4, was approved by City Council December 3, 1987. This is the first development phase of this tentative map. Tentative Tract 17413 (Tuscany Hills) is located North of Railroad Canyon Road and East of I-15. (See Attachment). SUMMARY The final map conforms substantially to the approved tentative map; and all City Council conditions of approval pertaining to the final map have been or will be completed prior to recordation. All bonds have been posted and the subdivision agreement has been submitted and is in the City Clerk's office for execution. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the final map, subject to the City Engineer's acceptance as being true and accurate. 2. Authorize City Clerk to sign said map and arrange for recordation. 3. Accept dedication of Underground Water Rights and record with final map. AGENDA ITEM NO. CI PAGE OFA NN VlGltil1TY MAP NOT TO GE75: E AGEMDA ITEM NO. - <Z PAGE 0T--L.- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281: Centur American (R.C. Hobbs Co.); a request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map for 144 condominium units on 8.38 acres, located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin Street. a PREPARED BY: PPROVED BYrC� p B Mark Rho des Dave G Merman Ran Molen yk Consulting Planner Comm. t�/ V. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND This project received Design Review approval as an apartment complex on March 14, 1989. The Planning Commission gave Design Review approval for the current project of 144 condominiums on December 20, 1989. Approval for the C.U.P. to allow condominiums was also given at this time. Relatively few changes exist between the proposed project and the original approval. The project as presented meets all applicable standards of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. DZSCUSSICN The most noticeable change in the current proposal is the addition of detached enclosed garages, also the addition of laundry facilities to each unit. Approval for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map would lapse two (2) years after Council approval. The tract map is necessary for condominiums in order to divide the air space of the lot. Building footprints are not required on the tentative map. Planning Commission has conditioned approval of the proposed carports on future design review. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for this project have been approved by the City Attorney. Staff has concerns regarding the landscaping of the freeway right-of-way area adjacent to this project. Staff recommends that the following condition be added as planning condition number 17, and re -numbering the remainder of the conditions. Condition Number 17: As a part of the landscaping plan for the project developer shall, prior to issuance of occupancy permit, submit for approval by the Community Development Director or his designee, a final landscape plan for the freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project boundary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 88-41 and approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281, based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of condition number 17 It is recommended that the Redevolpment Agency concur with City Council action. AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGE OF—LQ_. Page 2 January 9, 1990 Subject: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281; Century American (R.C. Hobbs Co.) Findings 1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the High Density Residential Zoning District. 3. This project, as conditioned, complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. 5. The subdivision, as conditioned, will not have significant impact on the envirommnet. 6. The subdivision is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the City's General Plan and is also consistent with the purpose and standards of the R-3 Multi -Family Residential District. 7. The project, as conditioned, complies with the objectives and Standards of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 9. As conditioned, there will be no conflicts with identified public easements. AGENDA ITEM NO. ____2LL PAGE OF..1�, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25281 Planning Division F 1. Each of the tenants of 'the proposed condominium, community apartment project or stock cooperative project shall receive written notification of intention to convert at least 60 days prior to the filing of a tentative map. In addition, a finding shall be made that each 'tenant has received 1b days' written notification that an application for a public report will be, or has been, submitted to the Department of Real Estate, and that such report will be available on request. The written norices__.to, tenants required, by this subdivision shall be deemed satisfied if such notices comply with the legal requirements for service by mail. 2. Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given written notification within 10 days of approval of a final map for the proposed conversion. 3. Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given 180 days' notice of intention to convert prior to termination of tenancy due to the conversion or proposed conversion. The provision of this subdivision shall not alter or abridge the rights or obligations of the parties in performance of their convenants, including, but not limited to, the provision of services, payment of rent or the obligations imposed by Sections 1941, 1941.1 and 1941.2 of the Civil Code. 4. Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given notice of an exclusive right to contract for the purchase of his or her respective unit upon the same terms and conditions that such unit will be initially offered to the general public or terms more favorable to the tenant. The right shall run for a period of not less than 90 days form the date of issuance of the subdivision public report pursuant to Section 11018.2 of the Business and Professions Code, unless the tenant gives prior written notice of his or her intention not to exercise the right. 5. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the State_ of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. 6. This conditionally approved Tentative Tract Map Number 25281 will expire two (2) years after the City Council approval date, unless extended as provided by the State of California Subdivision Map Act. 7. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service lateral shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. S. A precise survey -with closures for boundaries and lots shall be provided, per City ordinance. 9. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 10. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. AGENDA 1TUPA NO. PACs L Or CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25281 CONTINUED 11. All :signage for this permits. 12. All trailers utilized signage shall be subject prior to installation. project shall require appropriate City 1' during construction, mail boxes, and to:...,City Planning review and approval t 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified ��L J District ha:%e been paid. In ad�i_LLw_L all app_L_L �iC u C;I- 00 l Park and Capital Improvement fees shall be paid at this time. 14. Prior to final map approval, this subdivision shall be included within the City's Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District (Parkway Maintenance District). 15. Applicant shall pay AB 2926 School District fees in effect at the time building permits are issued. 16. Final Map shall reflect plotting as approved on plans date stamped November 6, 1989. Engineering Department: 17. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map approval. 18. Construct all off-site improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12), plans which must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. 19. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer and improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department standards and City Codes (L.E.M.C. 12.04 and 16.34). 20. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works off-site improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 21. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). 22. Submit a letter of verification to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to final map approval. 23. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 24. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 25. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through site or provided for by a method approved by the City Engineer. 26. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall. be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled ane approved. 27. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plane, as required by the City Engineer. AGENDA ITEM NO.41 PAGE - _ l CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25281 CONTINUED 28. Hydrology and hydraulics ,;study shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for 'review and approval. Study shall provide calculations to show Casino Drive has capacity to carry ten (10) year frequency storm run-off between curbs. 29. Culvert under Casino Drive shall be abandoned in place. If used for site drainage, downstream exit shall be provided with energy dissipator. Discharge from culvert shall be accepted by downstream property owner or directed into drainage easement. 30. Encroachment permit from Cal -Trans for grading and slope easements on their right-of-way shall be obtained prior to grading permit. 31. Slope easements and grading easements shall be obtained from adjacent private property owners where necessary prior to final map approval. 32. A slope easement and maintenance agreement shall be obtained from Cal -Trans for slopes on northeast property line before final map approval. 33. Provide right-of-way dedication on Casino Drive necessary to accommodate an 80 foot right-of-way (40 foot from centerline) and 40 feet from centerline on Franklin . 34. Applicant shall contribute pro -rata share for public`work improvements recommended by traffic study commissioned by applicant and local developers prior to building permits. 35. Contribute $840.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. 36. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds. 37. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. AGENDA ITEM PlO.�-rAr:: =, ?`"J �`� ' L PAGE _!L OF --�-�' Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 2 :F 3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map,25281 - Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented request for the subdivision of air space into 144 condominium units on approximately 9 acres. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Vestinq Tentative Tract Map 25281. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, gave a brief background report on the proposal; stated that they concur with staff recommendation and would. answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on -the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. There being no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council reaffirmation of Negative Declaration 88-41 and approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281 based on the Findings and subject to the 37 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 4. Conditional Use Permit 89-8 Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a Conditional Use Permit application for condominiums. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Conditional Use Permit 89-8. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, stated that they concur with staff recommendation and would answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Conditional Use Permit 89-8. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Discussion was held on condition number 6, pertaining to the CC & R's and when they would be put in place; formation of a homeowner's association for maintenance of common area land- scaping, and this being included in the CC & R's; formation of a silent homeowner's association prior to the recordation of map to prevent future right-of-way and ingress/egress problems, or an agreement with the developer for those types of things. Motion by Commissioner Brinley to reaffirm Negative Declaration 88-41 and approve Conditional Use Permit 89-8 based on the Findings and subject to the 6 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendment: Condition No. 6: "CC & R's shall be subject to approval b�y the Community Development Director and City Attorney, prior to the recordation of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281." second by Commissioner Wilsey Approved 5-0 2 AGENDA IiE€VI NO. >� PAGE OE I PLANNING DIVISION REPORTiTO PLANNING SSION ' Public Hearing VTTM 25281 CUP 89-8 R 88-5 REVISED December 20, 1989 PREPARED BY:REVIEWED BY:X ROVED BY• ?.tom 4naWkodaWd—es Gary hornhill Davederman CoAtract Planner City Planner Comm. ev. Dir. OWNER/APPLICANT Century American (R.C. Hobbs Company) 23421 South Pointe Drive, Suite 200 Laguna Hills, California 92653 REQUESTED USE Design Review approval for Conditional Use Permit 89-8, Residential Project 88-5 Revised, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281. SIZE AND LOCATION 8.38 acres at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin Street. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING ZONING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE Project Site - Vacant R-3 High Density Residential North - Freeway -- -- East - Vacant R-1 Specific Plan South - Vacant- R-1/ Low Density Residential/ C-1 Neighborhood Commercial West - Vacant R-1 Low Density Residential BACKGROUND This project is a revision of Residential Project 88-5 which was approved by City Council on March 14, 1989. The revised project contains only minor differences from the original; however, now, the project is proposed to be converted to condominiums. ANALYSIS The proposed project will exhibit off-white stucco with clay "S" tile roofing. Project site contains a total of 7.2 net acres of land. Proposed are twenty-five buildings (total includes 6 garage structures), with 144 units, which is the same number of units approved previously. - AGENDA ITEM NO. � PAGE OF._ 0 �T A r Public Hearing VTTM 25281 CUP 89-8 R 88-5 REVISED December 20, 1989 Page 2 In order to construct condominiums the applicant has changed the previously approved plans by adding an individual laundry facility to each unit as well as individual water heaters. Structural changes include the shortening of breezways to reduce building mass. Roofs have also been added over the second floor decks in order to break up a potentially long and monotonous eave line. Parking has been adequately supplied. The three types of parking facilities include open spaces, detached garages and metal carports. Basement parking is also included beneath some buildings. The metal carports are proposed and will be painted to match the condominium structures. Entry gates have been added to the proposed project and the central access road has been given a curvilinear alignment. Some landscaping has also been added along the drive aisles. The proposed landscaping is sufficient and provides good screening along all sides. Staff recommends that the second floor fireplaces be replaced on the revised project. The original approved project contained fireplace and chimney treatment on second story units, and staff feels this should be maintained. The chimneys help add texture and interest to the roof elevations and fireplaces are a beneficial amenity to residents. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-8 The Conditional Use Permit is required in order to allow the condominium use in the R-3 Zone. The covenants, conditions and restrictions have been submitted according to Section 17.30 of the Municipal Code. The Environmental Assessment and mitigation measures of Negative Declaration 88-41 address all environmental impacts. The proposed project satisfies all items listed under "Findings" of Section 17.74.070, Conditional Use Permits, of the Municipal Code. Covenants, conditions and restrictions are subject to final approval by the Community Development Director and the City Attorney. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25281 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281 has been filed in order to create a 144 unit condominium subdivision. Once the final map is recorded a legal condominium subdivision will be created by dividing the air space within the single parcel into individual units. However, the applicant has indicated that initially the units will not be sold individually, as is normally the procedure with condominiums. The existing property owner would retain ownership of the entire project, and as indicated this ownership will be retained for several years. As such, staff has made recommendations based on the Subdivision Map Act. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map is not required to reflect the building foot prints or air space division; however, such information is required for the final map. Prior to final recordation, the applicant will meet all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. These conditions include, but are not limited to, requiring written notice and exclusive purchasing rights to existing tenants when the conversion process begins. The proposed 144 units are less than the 20 units per acre density allowed by the R-3 Zone and the project is consistent with the General Plan. AGENDA ITEM NO. , PAGE 0=JD— Public Hearing VTTM 25281 CUP 89-8 R 88-5 REVISED December 20, 1989 Page 3 E Environmental Analysis Safi -la-5 reviewed Negative- Declaration 88-41 - for- the original project submittal. Staff recognizes the previous Environmental Assessment and mitigation measures as being valid and applicable to the current submittal. Therefore, staff recommends that Negative Declaration 88-41 be reaffirmed for Residential Project 88-5 REVISED, Conditional Use Permit 89-8 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council reaffirmation of Negative Declaration 88-41 and approval of Residential Project 88-5 Revised, Conditional Use Permit No. 89-8 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281, based on the Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the High Density Residential Zoning District. 3. This project, as conditioned, complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. 5. The subdivision, as conditioned, will not have a significant impact on the environment. 6. The subdivision is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the City's General Plan and is also consistent with the purpose and standards of the R-3 Multi -Family Residential District. 7. The project, as conditioned, complies with the Objectives and Standards of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 9. As conditioned, there will be public easements. no conflicts with identified AGENDA ITEM NO.. 3) PAGE, QE 1 3 r .Jo�31.� 2L37.l� .r Q�. ICC-44 PAGE f- 0" ,,� Q�. ICC-44 PAGE f- 0" ,,� REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 25347: Centex Homes; a request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4 lots for financing and conveyance purposes, located on the south side of Mountain Avenue and west of Michigan Street. PREPARED BY . 6 G?'� APPROVED BY • f DVED B6GaryvThornhill ave derman 4*L�' olen k Planning Manager Comm. ev. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND At the meeting of December 20, 1989, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, recommended approval of the Tentative Parcel Map 25347. There was no discussion of this item by the Planning Commission and no public testimony received. DISCUSSION The purpose of this map is to provide for the parcelization of the subject property to enable the owner to sell off portions for financing and reconveyance. This property is part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District. A Tentative Tract Map has been filed on parcel one by Centex Homes for approximately 600 residential lots. The Tentative Tract Map for the residential subdivision is currently being reviewed by Staff. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm E.I.R. 88-2 and approve Tentative Parcel Map 25347, based on the following findings. FINDINGS 1. The proposed project will not have significant impact on the environment. 2. The purpose of the tentative parcel map is for financial and conveyance reasons and no development is directly attributable to this project. 3. The proposed project complies with a-1 local zoning and subdivision standards. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF l MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1989 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mr. Fred Crowe. ROLL CALL: a PRESENT: Commissioners: Brinley, Gilenson, Saatho-]Ef, Wilsey and Brown ABSENT: Commissioners: None Also present were Community Development Director Gunderman, Planning Manager Thornhill and Assistant Planner Fairbanks. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Minutes of December 6, 1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Brinley abstaining Motion by Commissioner Brinley to approve Minutes of December 13, 1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Gilenson abstaining PUBLIC COMMENTS There being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed the PUBLIC COMMENTS section. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners (Continued from November 29, 1989) - Planning Manager Thornhill stated that staff is requesting this item be continued to the meeting of January 3, 1990, to allow the subdivider an opportunity to redesign the project in response to public testimony taken at - the November 29th meeting. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract Map 23988 to the meeting of January 3, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson. Approved 5-0 2. Tentative Parcel Map 25347 - Centex Homes - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4 lots for financing and conveyance purposes, located on the south side of"Nguntain Avenue (extended) and west of Michigan Avenue. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor Tentative Parcel Map 25347. Mr. 'Larry Truman, Butterfield Surveys/The Keith Companies, representing the applicant stated that he would answer any questions that may arise. Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 25347. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. There bein_ no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion. Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25347 based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 AGENDA E1"Enn PAGE Z OF A PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Public Hearing TPM 25347 Decembbr 20, 1989 PREPARED BY:� PPROVED BY: APPROVED BYWDaver y Haag Gary hornbill nderman Sr. 1;lanning A visor Planning Manager C. Dir. OWNER APPLICANT Centex Homes 3190 Chicago Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 REQUESTED USE To subdivide an 833.3'acre panel into 4 lots for financing and con- veyance purposes. SIZE AND LOCATION 833.3 acres of land generally located on the south side of Mountain Avenue (extended) and west of Michigan Street. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This tentative parcel map has been filed for the purposes of financing and conveyance of the subject property. Specifically, proposed parcel 1 is intended to be sold to the applicant, Centex Homes, to allow construction of a single-family subdivision. Tentative Tract 24624 has already has already been filed with the City and is presently being reviewed by Staff. A community park is planned for proposed parcel 4, which will be funded by The West Lake Elsinore Assessment District„ No development is presently envisioned for proposed parcels 2 and 3. Proposed parcel 2 was also the subject property involved in General Plan Amendment 89-11, which was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission November 29, 1989. Environmental impacts of this project have been id t'ff d in E.I.R. 88-2., Which -was certified by. the City Council on Dece.'rber ��, �19��. AGENDA {TEAR NO. -3� EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site - Vacant R -1/R-1 Specific Plan (HPD) Floodway/Floodplain North - Vacant R-1 Low Density Residential East - Single -Family R-1 Specific Plan/ Residences Floodway/Floodplain South - Vacant/Single- R-1 Specific Plan/ Family Residence Floodway/Floodplain West - Vacant R -R County (County) BACKGROUND This tentative parcel map has been filed for the purposes of financing and conveyance of the subject property. Specifically, proposed parcel 1 is intended to be sold to the applicant, Centex Homes, to allow construction of a single-family subdivision. Tentative Tract 24624 has already has already been filed with the City and is presently being reviewed by Staff. A community park is planned for proposed parcel 4, which will be funded by The West Lake Elsinore Assessment District„ No development is presently envisioned for proposed parcels 2 and 3. Proposed parcel 2 was also the subject property involved in General Plan Amendment 89-11, which was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission November 29, 1989. Environmental impacts of this project have been id t'ff d in E.I.R. 88-2., Which -was certified by. the City Council on Dece.'rber ��, �19��. AGENDA {TEAR NO. -3� r C Public Hearing TPM 25347 December 20, 1989 ANALYSIS Since this subdivision map is intended for financing and conveyance purposes only, no development is directly attributable to approval of this request. Rather, all conditions of approval relating to future construction will be placed on the related Tentative Tract %.ZQL _ mGLLat n..: i i TlLLc24624 at -l.J.�LL1 1:_ proposed map complies with all minimum standards of the zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended t1at the Planning Commission recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25347 based on the fol- lowing findings. FINDINGS 1. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The purpose of the tentative parcel map is for financial and conveyance reasons and no development is directly attributable to this project. 3. The proposed project complies with all local zoning and subdivision standards. '!1 AGENDA ITEM NO... J PAGE L OF—E- - REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL DATE: JANUARY 9, 1990 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF HIGH STREET LOCATED BETWEEN MILL STRE'ET�AND COUNTRY CLUB BOULEVARD PREPARED BY: Gam/ APPROVED BY: RAY 'DONNELL RON KIRCHNER SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES APPROVED BY: RON MOLENDY CITY MANAGER BACKGROUND The request for this abandonment was originally heard and approved by the Planning Commission on November 15, 1989. In reviewing an abandonment, the Planning Commission checks only for conflicts with the General Plan, the remaining areas of possible conflict are researched further into the processing procedure. Staff was recently supplied with information by adjoining property owners which would indicate that the abandonment of this portion of High Street would jeopardize the timing of their development of lots located in the vicinity of the intersection at Country Club Boulevard and High Street. (Ref. Exhibit "A") after careful examination of all available information with reference to Country Club Boulevard and High Street, staff has determined that this ortion of High Street should be retained as public right of way. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed abandonment be denied. AGENDA ITEM NO.%% PAGE 0,= ' j v � � Q W®=O� rO V� O " r 0000 W d u 5i� I o 9r 1 r J" > b � S) .JWPOSEDW ABANDONMEN It. ios • ioo' Q W®=O� rO O " r 0000 W d u 5i� I o 9r •• I ❑ I 3.Oo z® �• � o ►i96.00 1 /4 y•vF. � -• GENERAL LOCATION MAP REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7: Rancon Realty Fund IV; a request to subdivide 22.67 acres into 11 parcels and to change the zone from the C -P (Commercial Park) District and M-2 (General Manufacturing) District to the C-2 (General Commercial District), located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. PREPARED BY • ",� �.;�•tpPROVED By. Dave/ underman Ran Molen yk Comma Dev. Dir. City Manager V, BACKGROUND At the meeting of December 26, 1989, the City Council continued action on Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7, requested by Rancon Realty Fund IV. The Council asked staff and the applicant to consider conditions requiring freeway landscaping in the Cal Trans right-of-way adjacent to the site and inclusion of bike trails on Central and Collier. Staff has met with the applicant to discuss these issues. DISCUSSION Although the subject property abuts the I-15 freeway, landscaping of freeway rights-of-way require a uniform, City wide program which includes equitable funding mechanisms and close coordination between Cal Trans and the City. The staff is presently reviewing landscape alternatives and funding mechanisms for a comprehensive freeway landscaping program, however, no program exists presently. Consequently, staff feels it is appropriate to require Rancon participate in any future assessment district or other funding mechanism when a Citywide program is established, but not landscape the freeway presently. Regarding the bike trail issue, again, both Collier and Central are Cal Trans rights-of-way and require Cal Trans approval of street improvement plans. However, the applicant has agreed to design a Class III (on street) bike trail on Collier within the proposed street section, subject to Cal Trans approval. On Central, the need for traffic control measures within the proposed right-of-way may preclude an on street bike trail. Also, due to grade and topography concerns, as well as Cal Trans reluctance to encourage pedestrian and bicyclists to travel adjacent to freeway right-of-way, off street bike trails are not practical. Staff recommends that the following conditions be added as conditions number 42 and 43. AGENDA ITEM NO. �J----- PAGE ' _ OF -1-6L Page 2 January 9, 1990 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 24571; Zone Change 89-7 Rancon Realty Fund IV Condition Number 42: The property owner, or any subsequent property owner or assigns, shall contribute to and be a participant in any freeway_. landscaring.. funding mechanisms subsequently approved and adopted by the City and/or Cal Trans. Condition Number 43: RECOMMENDATION The applicant shall to be constructed, a trail within the section on Collier. is subject to Cal approval. design, and cause Class III bike proposed street Said bike trail Trans and City Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7 based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of conditions number 42 and 43. It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map 24571 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 2. The subdivision meets the development standards set forth by Section 17.48 of the Municipal Code (C-2 Zoning District). 3. The proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan. Zone Change 89-7 1. Negative Declaration No. 89-22 has been prepared for Zone Change 89-7 and Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the findings that all project impacts can be mitigated and no environmental impacts are anticipated. 2. This Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan. 3. State Planning Law, California Government Code Section 65860, requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. AGENDA ITEM NO.3� PAGE Z OF—_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 Planning Division 1. Tentative Parcel Map 24571!°Will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City?,.,,:Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. ; E 2. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface or any other site preparation activity will require the appropriate City rneiaii tom'. n %e7 _L _L Soils Report with a social w ��^ dations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's City Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official and Planning Department. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 3. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site preparation activity. 4. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval, the Master Sign Program to be submitted at the development of the first parcel, in accordance with Section 17.82 of the Municipal Code prior to building permit approval and shall be subject to further environmental review and project conditions in accordance'with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. 5. At the time of map recordation the applicant shall cause to be recorded an agreement to provide for future reciprocal parking, access, circulation, loading and landscaping maintenance, and a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement for maintenance of signage in favor of all lots, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. The agreement shall also include information on any environmental hazards or similar development constraints including the information that the site may be subject to liquefaction hazards; the report, its findings and recommendation shall be made available to all future owners/lessees. 6. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 7. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for Lots 1 and 11 a minimum six-foot (61) high decorative block or masonry wall with maximum four -foot (41) wide wrought iron sections to allow for drainage as necessary shall be provided along the western property line from Collier Avenue to the Interstate 15 boundary, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 8. The side yard setback for the first 50 feet northerly from Collier Avenue along the westerly boundary shall be 15 feet; this shall be- a fully landscaped setback with ground cover, shrubs and trees in accordance with the City's Landscape Guidelines and be permanently irrigated subject to the approval of Community Development Director. The landscaped setback shall be fully improved prior to Certificate of Occupancy for any structure for Lot 1. No structures may encroach into this setback. The remaining side yard setback shall be 5 feet along this property line to the Interstate 15 boundary and along the Interstate 15 boundary (northerly property line) to lettered Lot A. Specimen trees shall be spaced at least 100 feet on center within the setback areas. Planter widths- shall be increased where necessary to accommodate the specimen trees. AGENDA ITEM NO. ._c,..�` I r�1►�� a917 4 L-� PAGE OF_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 CONTINUED 9. Exhibits 1, 2, and 3, ,by RMG Design Group, illustrating conceptual development plans shall become a part of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 case file and commercial development of the site shall illustrate consistency with the integrated design/signage concept. r i E 10. One (1) lettered lot shall be indicated on the final map for the City's Entry Way Landscape theme. The City at its sole option may in the future accept the lot for dedication. The I LL.... 7 L L_7l L_ A.. -1 1 i.., ._... t 1.- J. 1G 1. 1.C1Gu lv;. aliait �.ic' trizi ag"la in shape aia�a'- be located at the northeastern most section of the map (intersection of I-15 and Central). The lot shall have the following dimensions described generally as follows: starting at a point at the most northeasterly corner of the map then southwesterly 90 feet along Central Avenue, then 28 feet northwesterly from said point, then with a radius of approximately 180 feet long to a point intersecting the northerly property line 135 feet from point of origin, as generally shown on the submitted Tentative Parcel Map date stamped October 27, 1989, for a total. square footage of 4,200 square feet. Lettered Lot "A" shall be landscaped in accordance with the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines and shall include ground cover, shrubs and trees, permanent irrigation and be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee, the City's Landscape Consultant and the City's Redevelopment Consultant. Said improvements shall be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Lot 7. The lettered Lot "A" landscaped improvements shall be maintained by the developer. 11. A triangular shaped, landscaped open space area shall be provided at the corner of Central and Collier Avenues and shall have a minimum dimension of 30 feet from the corner triangular cut off with a total square footage of 2,010. It shall have the following dimensions generally described as follows: starting at the most southeasterly point of the map then 40 feet northeasterly then southwesterly approximately 95 feet to a point intersecting the southerly most property line on Collier Avenue then approximately 40 feet easterly and then northeasterly 36.95 feet to point of origin. No commercial or accessory structures other than signage may encroach into this area. This area shall be fully landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, trees in accordance with the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. This area shall be fully improved prior to a Certificate of Occupancy for any structure in Lot 5. 12. All landscape improvements pursuant to Design Review approval for all lots shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year. b) Any pads that are not developed within 90 days after grading shall be provided with temporary planting and irrigation. Engineering Department 13. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map approval. 14. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030. ' r 1 AGENDA ITEM NO..��.� PAGE, OF -1-1- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 CONTINUED 15. Applicant shall provide sufficient additional right-of-way for a 61 foot half width right-of-way on Central Avenue to incorporate a decelerationlane for driveways. Geometrics of street sections subject ato Cal -Trans and City Engineers approval for an ultimate 9.4;foot roadway with a minimum 7 foot sidewalk. ?, 16. Developer shall provide sufficient right-of-way at the intersection of Central and Collier to insure proper land alignment through - tine intersection 'and"tgecmetries as required by Cal -Trans and City Engineer. 17. Applicant shall provide sufficient dedication along Collier for a fifty foot (501) half -width right-of-way to provide for a forty-three foot (431) half -width roadway with a seven foot (71) sidewalk adjacent to curb. 18. The applicant shall provide the following signal require- ments related to this parcel map and future development upon project site. a) Applicant shall install a signal at the intersection of Collier and Central upon the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building within the shopping center. Applicant to pay full cost of said signal subject to a benefit reimbursement district agreement between applicant and City. Applicant shall, as a process of finalizing signal improvement plans cause to be designed the necessary signals and systems to operate same signals subject to the City Engineer and Cal -Trans approval. In lieu of fees, applicant may cause required signals to be constructed with credit given and excess cost reimbursable by the City from the benefit reimbursement district agreement between applicant and City. b) Applicant shall submit a revised traffic study that addresses the need to install a traffic signal at either the future "B" Street location or main project entry on Collier at such time as 75% of the total square footage of occupancy of the project occurs; if warranted by the revised study applicant shall install the required traffic signal at the identified location as a portion of the area system and shall be reimbursed for expenses above developer's share apportionments set forth in benefit reimbursement district agreement. c) Developer shall, absent previous installation by Cal -Trans or by City, install a signal at the I-15 Southbound off -ramp at such time as 85% of the total square footage of occupancy of the project occurs, as a portion of the area system and shall be reimbursed for expenses above applicants fair share apportionment set forth in benefit reimbursement district agreement. d) Design of signals shall incorporate appropriate interconnects. e) Developer shall pay the lesser of the following as a contribution toward a signal at the northbound on-ramp to I-15. 1) Twenty percent (20%) of the combined construction and design cost, or; 2) A fair share apportionment of the value of such signal as a portion of the total signal program i.e., benefit reimbursement district agreement referenced by this condition in total. AGENDA !TEM �� PHGE�_, OF. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 CONTINUED 19. Applicant shall construct -a raised median along frontage of Collier and Central as permitted by Cal -Trans and the City. The developer will be r6imbursed for one-half the cost of the median by property owners on the opposite side of the street when they develop;:. If the grades of,the existing street make installation of the median infeasible, then the developer shall pay for one-half the cost of design and construction of the median subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 20. Minimum seven -foot (71) sidewalks will be required along the frontage of Collier and Central. The developer may provide a parallel pedestrian sidewalk on-site in an easement in lieu of sidewalk adjacent to the curb, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 21. The street improvements shall be constructed prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. 22. For driveways on Collier and Central which do not have a left -turn movement, there shall be only one egress lane with a maximum width of 15 feet. Ingress lanes for all driveways shall be of sufficient width to provide for truck turning movements. 23. All improvements constructed on Collier and Central will require an encroachment permit from Cal -Trans and subject to design review requirements as stated in letters dated May 15, 1989 and October 31, 1989. 24. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34). 25. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire protection. 26. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. ._ 27. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 28. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 29. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 30. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications -(with tie notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 31. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34, Resolution No. 85-26). 32. Submit a "Will -serve" letter to the City Engineerinc Department, from the applicable water agency, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 33. Construct all public works -improvements per approved street Plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 167.34). 34. Applicant shall obtain all necessary easements`,for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit. 35'. Contribute $2,267.00 towards the- City°s Piaster Entryway Siyn Program. 36. Applicant to enter into an agreement with the City for construction of public work improvements and post appropriate bonds. 37. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of site or redirecting drainage. 38. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street design recommendations. Provide final Soils Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification. 39. All parcels to have direct access to public right-of-way or be provided with an easement by separate instrument to be approved by the City Attorney. 40. All drainage facilities constructed shall meet the approval of Cal -Trans and the City. 41. Collier south of Central will need to be improved for proposed improvements at intersection as required by Cal -Trans and the City. Improvements only to include AC paving for thru lane transition. AGENDA ITEM NO.PAGE OF -- OF__ �_ PAGE FOUR - CITY 'iOUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER (7a, 1989 Single Family Residences at 16941 Ulmer and 404 West Flint. Mayor Winkler requested stafff comments on concerns expressed by Mr. Knapp. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that he just became aware of th,iS.property ownership change this afternoon, and needs to check it further. City Attorney Harper clarified that this does not create a problem with recording the document, and if further consideration is necessary, the recorded document would be superseded and thus a moot point. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ACCEPT THE DEEDS FOR RECORDATION. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 & Zone Change 89-7 - Rancon Realty Fund IV. A request to subdivide 22.67 gross acres into 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres, and to change the zone from C -P (Commercial Park District) and M-2 (General Manufacturing District) to C-2 (General Commercial District). The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the request and advised that the concern with regard to signage raised'by the Planning Commission has been addressed. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. asking those in favor of this project to speak. The following person spoke: Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, representing the applicant, advised that they are in agreement with all recommended conditions of approval and offered to answer questions. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no._ one, the public hearing was closed at 7:24 p.m. Councilman Buck suggested that a condition be imposed with regard to traffic problems at the freeway off -ramp. He suggested that they fund or bond for two lanes at that off -ramp. He_further suggested that landscaping of the freeway off -ramp -area be funded by this project. Councilman Washburn expressed concern with the two year time frame on the tentative map, and suggested that they be given one year unless extended. He further commented on the proposed conditions as follows: Condition #12.b. - He suggested grass or turf be required to eliminate confusion. Condition #19 - Median should be as required by the City and the City deal directly with Caltrans. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that an agreement has been reached with Caltrans already, however, Caltrans does control all construction on Highway 74. Condition #20 - Questioned the sidewalk specifications t utilize seven feet. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that this area would include landscaping and AGENDA ITEM! 3 I PAGE -LOF PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER � , 1989 allow for the possibility of a meandering sidewalk. Community Development director Gunderman further explained that the design would need to be worked out with regard to access:toints and level of usage. He suggested that this be,'considered at the time of Design Review. F Conditions #42 - Suggested addition of Condition requiring a Class II.Bicycle Lane. Counciiinaii Watiilburii suyyu5ted inclusion of requirement ror a landscaping plan to address the freeway off -ramp and the freeway along the back of this development. City Manager Molendyk advised that this will require that the City work out an agreement with Caltrans. Mayor Winkler questioned the maintenance of this type of landscaping. Staff explained that this could be done through the City-wide Lighting and Landscaping District. Community Services Director Watenpaugh further explained that we are working on a master plan to address freeway landscaping and alternatives. Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with making a decision for Caltrans. City Attorney Harper explained that the City can condition for landscaping of a specific area subject to future agreement with Caltrans. Council discussion ensued with regard to freeway and off -ramp landscaping and alternatives to accomplish it. City Manager Molendyk clarified that we can condition the developer to participate and establish an agreement with Caltrans at a later date. He clarified that the condition can be done pursuant to a City agreement with Caltrans. Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, commented that they want a pleasing appearance as well, however this is only the Parcel Map and Zone Change and the landscaping could be addressed at a later date. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO ADD A CONDITION #42 REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A CLASS II BICYCLE LANE. (This motion was not voted on because it was decided to continue this item to January 9, 1990.) Fred Crowe, expressed concern that with the Caltrans frontage it may be difficult to provide a safe bicycle lane. Community Development Director Gunderman expressed concern with this type of condition, as it may cause difficulty for recordation of the map. He suggested continuance of the map, prior to placement of such a restrictive condition. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS. 32. Zone Change 89-15 & Commercial Project 89-5 _ Doctor H. Irvani Kgnneth Brown. A request to change the zoning from C -P (Commercial Park District) to C-2 (General Commercial District), and a request to construct a 21,000 square foot, two-story commercial building on a 1.1 acre site, located at the northwest corner of Riverside Drive and Joy Avenue. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised -that it is a departure from the nautical theme utilized in most areas along Riverside Drive. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE _L_. OF -1-9— C REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: December 26, 1989 t SUBJECT: Tentative PaFcel Map 24571; Zone Change 89-7: r- Rancon Realty Fund IV; A request to subdivide 22.67 gross acres into 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres, and to change the zone from C -P (Commercial Park District) and M-2 (General Manufacturing District) to C-2 (General Commercial District). The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. PREPARED B APPROVED - rielle Rbstivo Assistant Planner BACKGROUND BYA-i� ytenp' VED BY: Dave GpVderman Comm. ev. Dir. Ron Molendyk City Manager At the meeting of November 15, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Zone Change 89-7 by a 3-0 vote, Commissioners Saathoff and Gilenson absent (Minutes and Staff Report attached). At said meeting Tentative Parcel Map 24571 was continued to the Special Meeting of November 29, 1989, at which time the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 by a 5-0 vote (Minutes and Staff Report attached). Condition number 4 pertaining to Design Review for future site development was amended to require a master signage program to be submitted concurrently with the first project. Condition number 5 pertaining to reciprocal site access and easements was amended to require a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement for maintenance of signage in favor of all lots. A requirement for temporary planting and irrigation for rough graded pads was added to condition number 12. DISCUSSION Tentative Parcel Map 24571/Zone Change 89-7 is located at the former swap meet site (northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues). Staff concerns included conditioning the project to ensure integrated development of the site; to provide adequate buffering between the cemetery and the commercial development; to provide a visually pleasing streetscape commensurate with the site being a "gateway" to the City, and to provide City "gateway" landscaping areas as part of an overall City Redevelopment policy/plan. Additionally, traffic impacts anticipated were mitigated by intersection signalization at the I-15 and southbound ramp, Collier and Central Avenues, and at Central Avenue and future "B" Street. These are conditioned at various points of site development. Full Design Review in accordance with the local codes will be required for commercial development of the site. Zone Change 89-7 is consistent with the General Plan. AGENDA ITEM NO. J�j PAG,.!-�_ 0'FJft— Page 2 December 26, 1989 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map:24571; Zone Change 89-7 Rancon Realty Fund IV E' F RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the findings listed, adopt Negative Declaration 89-22, and approve Tentative Parcel Map 24571 subject to the attached conditions, and approve Zone Change 89-7 and adopt Ordinance No. which will implement subject Zone Change. It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map 24571 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 2. The subdivision meets the development standards set forth by Section 17.48 of the Municipal Code (C-2 Zoning District).: 3. The proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan. Zone Change 89-7 1. Negative Declaration No. 89-22 has been prepared for Zone Change 89-7 and Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the findings that all project impacts can be mitigated and no environmental impacts are anticipated. 2. This Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan. 3. State Planning Law, California Government Code Section 65860, requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. -LL PAGE -rte OF,—ft. MINUTES OF SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1989 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:03 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Gilenson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey and Brown ABSENT: Commissioners: None Also present were Community Development Director Gunderman, Planning Manager Thornhill, Assistant Planner Restivo, Consultant Planner :Haag and Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Brinley to approve Minutes of November 13, 1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 3-0 (Commissioners Gilenson and Saathoff abstaining) PUBLIC COMMENTS There being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed the PUBLIC COMMENTS section. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 - Rancon Realty Fund IV (Continued from November 15, 1989) - Assistant Planner Restivo presented a proposal to subdivide 22.67 acres into 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres, located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenue. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 24571. Mr. Fred Crowe, representing Rancon Realty Fund IV, stated that he believes that the concerns expressed by the Commission at the last meeting have been resolved, and they are in agreement with the conditions. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 24571. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. -Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. Commissioner Wilsey commented on condition number 35, pertaining to the dollar amount contribution to the City's Master. Entryway Sign Program, and asked if this fee was figured in and considered fair --in so much as we are getting the property, or is this a fee that has been generated by the number of parcels and not taken into consideration? Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell responded that this was a standard fee charged the developer and the developer did not request any credit for the land. Commissioner Wilsey recommended that condition number 35 be waived. Commissioner Wilsey recommended that condition number 12.b be -_added, which would read: "Temporary planting and irrigation shall be provided on pads if building permits are not pulled 90 days after grading." AGENDA ITEM NO.2 . PAGE OF r Minutes of Special Planning Commission Meeting November 29, 1989 Page 2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 = RANCO REALTY FUND IV CONTINUED Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 35, where a developer provides a certain amount of free Iand, if policy has been established to provide some relief. Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell responded in the negative. Commissioner Saathoff recommended that condition number 35 remain. Chairman Brown commented on condition number 5, pertaining to maintenance for signage, and recommended that a reciprocal agreement for ingress/egress for maintenance of any master signage program identifying the center as a whole be included. Chairman Brown recommended that condition number 4, be amended by adding the words "the Master Sign Program," after the words Design Review approval. Mr. Crowe requested that this be included in the agreement, that way when it comes to Design Review that would be one of the items considered. Discussion at the table, ensued on the the master sign program and tying it to the tract map instead of the agreement; recording the agreement identifying all of the items so that every user will be aware; condition number 5, pertaining to ingress/egress for maintenance; recording the agreement separately which will include the addition of a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement for maintenance of signage, and adding signage program to the design review part of condition number 4; when and who will submit the master sign program, and the master signage program to be submitted to Design Review at the development of the first parcel. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-22 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the Findings and subject to the 41 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 4: "All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval, the Master Sign Program to be submitted at the development of the first parcel, in accordance with Section 17.82 of the Municipal Code prior to building permit approval and shall be subject to further environmental review and project conditions in accordance with the provision of California Environmental Quality (CEQA) Guidelines." Condition No. 5: "At the time of map recordation the applicant shall cause to be recorded an agreement to provide for future reciprocal parking, access, circulation, loading, and landscaping maintenance, and a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement for maintenance of signage in favor of all lots, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. The agreement shall also include information on any environmental hazards or similar development constraints including the information that the site may be subject to liquefaction hazards; the report, its findings and recommendation shallade available to all fut��3hr�� se PAGE OF Fd Minutes of Special Planning Commission Meeting November 29, 1989 Page 3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24571 = RkNC0N REALTY FUND IV CONTINUED Condition No. 12.b: "Any pads that are not developed within 90 days after grading shall be provided with temporary planting and irrigation." second by Commissioner Wilsey. Approved 5-0 2. Draft Environmental Impact Report 88-2 - RMG Engineering/The Keith Companies - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a Draft Environmental Impact Report to consider the formation of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, a special district to provide utilities and related infrastructure improvements to the study area, as well as related follow-on residential development which will be facilitated by the utility and infrastructure improvements. The project area encompasses approximately 1,127 acres of land generally bounded by Lakeshore Drive and Mountain Avenue on the north; Machado Street on the east; Alvarado Street and its extension on th- south and the Santa Ana Mountains to the west. Planning Manager Thornhill stated that there are three projects located within this assessment district that are being considered by the Commission this evening and they are: the Marinita Tract, Ortega Partners Tract and Centex Homes. Ms. Marlis Mang, Keith Companies consulting firm, gave a brief background report on the Environmental Impact Report and its analysis of environmental impacts of the assessment district with its infrastructure improvements, and the impacts of six (6) development project located within the assessment district. Ms. Mang gave a brief summary on the following impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report: traffic, air quality, noise, hydrology, land forms and topography, biological resources, agricultural, population housing and employment, schools. Mr. John Kane, of Kunzman & Associates, gave a brief summa -- on the circulation element, and stated that he would answ._ any questions that may arise. Mr. John Man drell, Butterfield/Keith Companies, gave a brief background report on the overall issues: drainage, traffic --connection of Grand Avenue from its current northerly terminus up to Robb Road, and the extension of Lincoln to Grand; sewer and water facilities; fire station and the need for a park in the area. Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor of Draft Environmental Impact Report 88-2. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Jim Bishop, 15080 Christina Court, Lake Elsinore, stated he is opposed to this because of the impact on the schools. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak in opposition. Mrs. Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln, Lake Elsinore, stated tt_ _ she was not in opposition, but has a question. If all of _these impacts are going to cause the air pollution and other things that we have been hearing, is there a possibility that more developers can be involved, enlarge the entire area and still get the assessment going? AGENDA ITEM NO. -L PAGE OF_L_ PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING` COMMISSION a: Public Hearing TPM 24571 Nbvember 29, 1989 A n 1 - PREPARED BY: �� Lk APPROVED BY: Gabrielle Restivo Ga Thornhill Assistant Planner City Planner OWNER/APPLICANT Rancon Realty Fund IV 27720 Jefferson Avenue Rancho California, California 92390 REQUESTED USE A request to create 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres on an existing 20 parcel site. SIZE AND LOCATION The site is 22.67 gross acres, and is located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE Project Site - Vacant North - I-15 Freeway East - Vacant South - Vacant West - Cemetery PROJECT DESCRIPTION ZONING GENERAL PLAN C-P/M-2 General Commercial M-1 General Commercial M -1/C -M Limited Industrial Commercial Manufacturing M -2/M-1 Public/Semi-Public Limited Industrial The proposal is to create an 11 -parcel, commercial parcel map from 20 existing parcels located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. -The conceptual development plan proposes one (1) primary and one (1) secondary access on Central Avenue and two (2) primary accesses and one (1) secondary access on Collier Avenue. The secondary accesses will allow right -turn ingress only. The conceptual site plan shows an area set aside at the intersection of Central Avenue and the Interstate 15 southbound off -ramp for a City identification sign/landscaped planter. A similar project identification sign/planter area is proposed for the Central Avenue and Collier Avenue intersection. Exhibits showing conceptual architecture and landscape plans have been submitted. ANAL"SIS Although the current proposal is for parcelization of the site only and not for design review/site plan approval, staff has concern AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF11— r Public Hearing TPM 24571 November 29, 1989 Page 2 with the conceptual site plan. The site plan shows less than fifteen foot (151) setbacks between parking/driveway-areas and the public right-of-ways, which under current code would be allowed only if exceptional landscaping or outstanding design features are provided, for example decorative walls, artwork, fountains, public seating areas and other public amenities. Also, there is an insufficient number of parking planter islands to provide parking lot shading. At the time of Design Review consideration, these issues will have to be addressed for conformance with the Code. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 , produced by RJM, which illustrates a conceptual architecture signage and landscape plan, including the lettered landscaped areas for both Central Avenue intersections, shall be considered a part of the case file, and any future development of the site shall be consistent with the integrated theme. An agreement will be required to provide for reciprocal parking, circulation, access, and for maintenance of landscaped areas. Conditions of Approval will include the following: a) Commercial structures must be setback fifteen feet (151) from the cemetery property line for the first fifty feet (501) of property line from Collier Avenue northerly towards I-15. b) The proposed "Lot All for the project identification signage must be triangular in shape and have a minimum dimension of twenty-eight (28), with a minimum total square footage of 4,200. c) A :Landscaped area in Lot 5, shall be provided at the intersection of Central and Collier Avenues. The area shall have a minimum dimension of thirty -feet (301) and shall have a minimum total square footage of 2,010. The environmental assessment revealed the following areas of potential impacts: 1. Soil liquefaction; 2. Increased drainage and storm drainage concerns, and; 3. Traffic and circulation A soils report has already been submitted to the Planning Department which includes findings and recommendations to mitigate potential liquefaction hazards. The information that certain areas of the site may be subject to liquefaction hazards shall be recorded and the report, including its findings and recommendations, will be made available to all potential buyers/lessees. The soils report will be required to be submitted along with requests for any grading or building permits. All conditions of the City Engineering Department and the Riverside County Flood Control Department for storm drainage requirements and improvements will be met as a condition of project approval. Traffic A deceleration lane from the I-15 southbound ramp to the first driveway entrance on Central Avenue is being requested by Cal -Trans. In addition, Cal -Trans will require that the street cross-sections on Central Avenue align both north and south of Collier Avenue. Traffic signalization at the intersection of AGENDA ITEM IVO.. 3 `i _ PAGE. OF—L— 1 Public Hearing TPM 24571 November 29, 1989 t, Page 3 Central Avenue and Interstate 15, Central Avenue and. Collier, and at the intersection of Collier and "B" Street will b? required. An assessment reimbursement district for traffic signalization is being proposed. All proposed street cross-sections and other right-of-way improvements will require Cal -Trans approval. Negative Declaration 89-22 has been prepared for this project based on the findings that all project environmental impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels and no environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends to Planning Commission that they recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-22 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the following Findings and attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 2. The subdivision meets the development standards set forth by Sections 17.48 of the Municipal Code (C-2 Zoning District). 3. The proposed land uses is consistent with the General Plan. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF—La— ORDINANCE NO. 877 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 22.67 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTRAL AND COLLIER AVENUE, FROM C -P (COMMERCIAL PARK DISTRICT) AND M-2 (GENERAL MANUFACTURING) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) (ZONE CHANGE 89-7 - RANCON REALTY FUND IV). TNF. CTTV rnTTMOTT. r11'P TNF r%TMV r%V T.Z TIV VT.CTATnn�+ P.TT TM'^-M'.TT w DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION The Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: A.P. #377-060-006 - PORTION OF LOT 241 A.P. #377-060-009 - LOTS 237, 238 & 239 BLK B A.P. #377-060-010 - LOTS 232, 233 & 234 BLK B A.P. #377-060-011 - PORTION LOTS 228 & 229 BLK B AND LOT 230 & 231 BLK B A.P. #377-060-012 - A.P. #370-070-004 - PORTION LOT 15 BLK F A.P. #370-070-005 - LOT 17 BLK F A.P. #370-070-006 - LOT 14 BLK F A.P. #377-070-011 - PORTION LOT 246 A.P. #377-070-012 - PORTION LOT 246 A.P. #377-070-019 - PORTION LOT 247 BLK B A.P. #377-070-020 - PORTION LOTS 247, 248, 249 & 250 A.P. #377-070-021 - A.P. #377-070-022 - PORTION LOT 251 A.P. #377-070-024 - PORTION LOT 251 A.P. #377-070-025 - PORTION LOT 246 BLK B AND LOTS 243, 244 & 245 BLK B A.P. #377-070-026 - PORTION LOT 242 A.P. #377-070-027 - PORTION LOT 1 BLK 6 from C -P (Commercial Park District) and M-2 (General Manufacturing) to C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District on approximately 22.67 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such C-2 Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. Negative Declaration 89-22 has been prepared for Zone Change 89-7 and Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the Finding that all project impacts can be mitigated and no environmental impacts are anticipated. 2. This Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan. AGENDA ITEM PAGE Gr JQ 3. State Planning Law, California Government Code Section 65860, requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. SECTION TWO: This ordinance shall become effective as provided by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 26th day of December, 1989 , upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: PASSED, day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this —, upon the following roll call vote: Jim Winkler, Mayor ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk ( SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE j _9 ')E- -- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Ordinance No.W91, City of Lake Elsinore: Adoption of an interim ordinance of the City of T,akP Elsinore expanding the moratorium areas on certain properties around the Lake Perimeter and East Floodplain Planning Area. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY• - PPROVED Gary Thornhill Dave nderman Planning Manager Com4l Dir. BACKGROUND B C" Rdn olendy City Manager At the meeting of December 12, 1989, the City Council unanimously approved the adoption of Urgency Ordinance, No. 876 for the expansion of the East Floodplain Planning`Area to include the following areas (see Exhibit "A"): 1. Certain properties located between Lakepoint Park and the San Jacinto River and between Lakeshore Drive and the moratorium area as approved under Ordinance No. 868 on November 14, 1989. 2. Certain properties located southerly of Cereal Street and bounded by Corydon Road on the southeast and the City Limits of the southwest, and moratorium area on the west and, 3. The Lake Perimeter Area beginning at the City boundary at Bonnie Lea Drive and the Lake, continuing southwesterly to Grand Avenue, and including all properties located within the lake side boundaries of Grand Avenue, Riverside Drive, and Lakeshore Drive, and terminating at Lakepoint Park. DISCUSSION The adoption of this interim ordinance would extend the moratorium to coincide with the period of time prescribed under Ordinance No. 868. Both interim ordinances would, unless extended, remain in effect until May 14, 1990. This item has been noticed for hearing pursuant to Government Code requirements. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Interim Ordinance No. _ and the attached Findings until May 14, 1990. Findings 1. The City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for'the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE _J._ OF Page 2 Jaunary 9, 1990 Subject: Ordinance No. , City Of Lake Elsinore: Adoption of an interim ordinance 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat for adverse impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. AGENDA ITEM NO. 35" MGE OF ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN AREA AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER AREA TO INCLUDE IN THE MORATORIUM CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE AREA NORTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED INLET CHANNEL DEFINED AS BEING BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY LAKEPOINT PARK, ON THE NORTH BY LAKESHORE DRIVE, ON THE EAST BY THE SAN JACINTO RIVER, AND THEN SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE INLET CHANNEL NEAR THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD , 2) THE AREA LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF CEREAL STREET AND BOUNDED BY CORYDON ROAD ON THE SOUTHEAST AND THE CITY LIMITS ON THE SOUTHWEST AND 3) THE LAKE PPRTMETER AREA BEGINNING AT THE CITY BOUNDARY AT BONNIE LEA DRIVE AND THE LAKE, CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY TO GRAND AVENUE, AND THEN INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE LAKE SIDE BOUNDARIES OF GRAND AVENUE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, AND LAKESHORE DRIVE, AND TERMINATING AT LAKEPOINT PARK. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE HEREBY FINDS THAT: 1. The City in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter area. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Pursuant to California government Code Section 65858 current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat to adversely impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE Any approvals of subdivisions, use permits, variances, design review approvals, or any other applicable entitlement for use which is required in order to comply with the zoning Ordinance shall be prohibited within the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter Area, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, until a land use plan for the entire Planning Area is adopted or this interim ordinance or subsequent extensions have expired. AGENDA ITEM ND..r— PAGE OF-�'� Page 2 Ordinance No. SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and ex- pire on May 14, 1990, unless subsequently extended in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th d— of janiiary, ,l 990 , ul ^.n the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk ( SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney Fred Dominguez, Mayor Pro Tem APaFJ,ZiITEf.4 No.. � W � W IE ` a --- 'r O � � z L-1 'r, J w i i RIL 4 ►.. CL 3� +� Z t Z o iku > Qa W Us -----------► c �� AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF •� S WN 03 V•QfW UO R N< 2=Z <O- << W N f A j O Q Z W •} - - 2 17fT�p 1l i � Q • e � u� v " 5 ar . uTia Porar :-• :•:� _� _ W � W IE ` a --- 'r O � � z L-1 'r, J w i i RIL 4 ►.. CL 3� +� Z t Z o iku > Qa W Us -----------► c �� AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECC-aER 12, 1989 Mr. Ryal commented that he has not yet been notified as to where the property line is. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that it appears that the property line is a the back side of the sidewalk, however he would need to verify that location the next day. City Manager Molendyk advised that this is an update and work will continue and Mr. Ryal will be notified it writing. IN )%T"V 1 Dv r" c•vnrr'M T �+�. rr ^V f`.`F TSr T'7 TTTI CARRIED T2V iTTTANIilOUS ..� ... .�.,...,.,+..., SECONDED D DOMI UEZ AND VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THIS REPORT. 54. Mr. Solis' Complaint. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that this item had been referred to this meeting for a report from staff. He explained that the fees paid by Mr. Solis were in accordance with ordinances in effect at the time of construction. He further explained that there was a period of time when those fees were inadvertantly not collected, there is not a provision in the ordinance to allow for that collection after the fact. He advised that a letter confirming this information will be sent to Mr. Solis. MOVED BY WASHBURN,-SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THIS REPORT. 55. Ordinance No. 876 - Urgency Ordinance for the expansion of the East Floodplain Planning Area to include the following areas: 1) Certain properties located between Lakepoint Park and the San Jacinto River and between Lakeshore Drive and the moratorium area as described in Ordinance No. 838, and 2) Certain properties located southerly of Cereal Street and bounded by Corydon Road on the southeast and the City Limits on the Southwest, and the moratorium area on the west. Mayor Winkler inquired, since the affected area does not involve his property, is it advisable to vote on this Ordinance. City Attorney Harper recommended that he not participate in this matter. City Manager Molendyk explained the areas that had inadvertantly been deleted from the ordinance. He reminded Council that this item would come back for a public hearing on the regular ordinance. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW; A0631T ORDINANCE NO. 876 AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SCHEDULE THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 9, 1990. Findings 1. The City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat for adverse impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. AGENDA ITEM NO. ��- �D o1F PAGE TWENTY-TWO =IITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECC BER 12, 1989 ORDINANCE NO. 876 AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN AREA AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER AREA TO INCLUDE IN THE MORATORIUM CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE AREA NORTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED INLET CHANNEL DEFINED AS BEING BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY LAKEPOINT PARK, ON THE NORTH BY LAKESHORE DRIVE, ON THE EAST BY SAN JACINTO RIVER, AND THEN SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE NORTHERLY n_nUNDA"Py CF THE 11.1 -Em. CHANNEL NEAR THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, 2) THE AREA LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF CEREAL STREET AND BOUNDED BY CORYDON ROAD ON THE SOUTHEAST AND THE CITY LIMITS ON THE SOUTHWEST AND 3) THE LAKE PERIMETER AREA BEGINNINZ AT THE CITY BOUNDARY AT BONNIE LEA DRIVE AND THE LAKE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY TO GRAND AVENUE, AND THEN INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE LAKE SIDE BOUNDARIES OF GRAND AVENUE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, AND TERMINATING AT LAKEPOINT PARK. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Molendyk requested a joint executive session regarding potential litigation and property acquisition following the Redevelopment Agency meeting. CITY COUNCIL C014MENTS Councilman Starkey commented on the City Christmas Tree at the intersection of Main/Graham and his hope that it will be an annual event. He further commented on the work being done at the T &-S _ Development center to lower the manhole covers. He reminded the public of the Chamber of Commerce New Year's Eve Party with the theme Glitz, Glitter and Glamor at the Community Center. Councilman Buck thanked all of the volunteers for their work on the Christmas Parade. _n Councilman Washburn thanked the students at Machado School for their letters requesting a bike trail around the Lake; and requested that staff write a response from the Mayor. Mayor Winkler advised that S.A.W.P.A. had made the decision to condemn 157 acres of the property owned by Crater Acres; and when he receives formal notification, copies will be available for review in the City Clerk's Office. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 9:15 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:24 P.M. CLOSED SESSION THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 9:25 P.M. TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION. THE"CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:55 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN. ACEN DA ITEM NO. PAGE--'--- OF_^— ORDINANCE NO. 876 AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN AREA AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER AREA TO INCLUDE IN THE MORATORIUM CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE AREA NORTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED INLET CHANNEL DEFINED AS BEING BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY LAKEPOINT PARK, ON THE NORTH BY LAKESHORE DRIVE, ON THE EAST BY THE SAN JACINTO RIVER, AND THEN SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE INLET CHANNEL NEAR THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD , 2) THE AREA LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF CEREAL STREET AND BOUNDED BY CORYDON ROAD ON THE SOUTHEAST AND THE CITY LIMITS ON THE SOUTHWEST AND 3) THE LAKE PERIMETER AREA BEGINNING AT THE CITY BOUNDARY AT BONNIE LEA DRIVE ANn THF 1AVP- LUNIINUING SOUTHWESTERLY TO GRAND AVENUE, AND THEN INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE LAKE SIDE BOUNDARIES OF GRAND AVENUE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, AND LAKESHORE DRIVE, AND TERMINATING AT LAKEPOINT PARK. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE HEREBY FINDS THAT: 1. The City in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter area. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Pursuant to California government Code Section 65858 current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat to adversely impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE Any approvals of subdivisions, use permits, variances, design review approvals, or any other applicable entitlement for use which is required in order to comply with the zoning Ordinance shall be prohibited within the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter Area, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, until a land use plan for the entire Planning Area is adopted or this interim ordinance or subsequent extensions have expired. 7, AGENNDA ITE -i'0 i PAGE OF� Page 2 Ordinance No. 876 SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and ex- pire on January 26, 1990, unless subsequently extended in the manner required by law. r PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 1989, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER ATTEST: /s/ Fred Dominguez FRED DOMINGUEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM 1 i�,LV�.cki1!nne.JSa�.��_. cki Lynne-Kasad, City Clerk - (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: /s/ John R. Harper John R. Harper, City Attorney AGENDA ITEM Na. _J5 PAGE _2L OF �••} 1 X2 .. N N V O < Z O Z r Z « < JC W= Wo°W 00tht •�� - O � O� NZ Wr 0 .� 2, w _ Fp ��!- ~' j � . �; • � :'u is _ - - All 1.4 •.-�� •aJn'fn � r4 r m 2 It � � \ = n O Z N ti r ��if/pp:�� • i� f f W a•'n O W JL JJO7 fW S -4m <m ON f i O N N N N ¢ < < < *y.4�y• m memKi o J pyo"L� `i F o e O tr7 rAl , o; ti r _QW _ F7Vi tL W - ; z� z n w d% LL CL 0 t b zLU : a .a w RLw a �sfi W o ` o i .s LU = w xa w + 41 CN, LL v cc ,5 AGENDA ITEM NO. a PAGE C PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 1989 Way Dedication__ 16920 Wells Street = Claude & Sharon DeLaO. Councilman Buck requested clarification on this item. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that it should be called _out as a slope easement and advised that it would be corrected on the deed. - MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE ..;TO ACCEPT THE GRANT DEED FOR THE PURPOSE OF A SLOPE EASEMENT FROM CLAUDE AND SHARON DEI- O. 20. c. General Plan Amendment 89-8; Zone Change 89-9 and Tentative Tract 22537 - Brookstone Development, Inc. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from "Specific -Plan" to "Lora Density Residential (0-6.0 dwellings/acre)"; to consider a request for pre -zoning to R-1 (Single Family Residential) and to consider a 98 lot single family subdivision. The proposed project consists of approximately 60 acres of land, lying southeasterly of Grand Avenue at the terminus of Golondrina Street. Planning Manager Thornhill advised that this request had been withdrawn by the Applicant. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Procosed Abandonment of a Portion of Grandview Avenue and a Portion of Orange Street, 5authwest of Lakerid2e Road. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that this is an existing paper street which is being abandoned in connection with upcoming developments at this location. He further advised that the plan replaces this particular access adequately. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. asking those in favor of the proposed Abandonment to speak. No one spoke. -- Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:45 p.m. 1 MOVED BY WASHBURTTY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-63 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD SAID RESOLUTION OF VACATION. RESOLUTION NO. 89-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF GRANDVIEW AVENUE AND ORANGE STREET PURSUANT TO THE STREET VACATION ACT OF 1941 AS CONTAINED IN SECTIONS 8300 ET SEQ OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 32. Ordinance No. 868. Adoption of an Interim Ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore adopting a Moratorium on Development proposals on properties in the East Floodplain Planning Area and City Lake Perimeter. Mayor Winkler advised that he would not be participating in this item. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez assumed the Chair. �j AGENDA ITEM NO. OF PAGE SEVEN' - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER i4, 1989 Planning Manager Thornhill advised that the proposed ordinance would extend the existing Moratorium for a period of six months. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. asking those in favor of Ordinance No. 86a to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez asked those in opposition to speak. The following person spoke: Alan Manee, Manee Consulting, presented a letter to and drawing to Council for a project that is in the design stage. He requested that this location be excluded from the Moratorium area advising that there are no access or traffic concerns which would be associated with this project. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Councilman Washburn inquired whether Mr. Manee's plans had been submitted yet. Staff advised that they had not. Councilman Washburn commented that he did not feel six months would be detrimental to the project, in that they would also need to go through the application process for a 404 permit. Councilman Buck supported this moratorium to plan for the future needs of the City. Mr. Manee inquired whether this Moratorium would preclude him from submitting his plans. Staff clarified that he could submit plans, however the Moratorium would prevent project approvals for that six month period. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 868: ORDINANCE NO. 868 AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM, ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN EAST FLOODPLAIN AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER, WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED BY A BOUNDARY ALONG MISSION TRAIL AND CORYDON ROAD ON THE EAST; TO CEREAL STREET C AROUND SKYLARK AIRPORT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMIT AND THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE CITY LIMITS TO THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY, THENCE NORTHERLY TO A LINE APPROXIMATELY 1320 FEET NORTH OF SYLVESTER STREET THENCE EASTERLY FROT THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY TO THE SAN JACINTO RIVER AND AROUND THE VONS SHOPPING CENTER TO LAKESHORE DRIVE. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER 33. Ordinance No. 869. Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Adoption of an Interim Mitigation Fee Ordinance. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed the previous actions taken A ITE AGENDA M NO. r PAGE�1 °� 0 C �j� 1 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/ +Q, li REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1.b DATE: November 14, 1989 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 868 , City of Lake Elsinore: Adoption of an Interim Ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore adoptilig a Moratorium on Development proposals on properties in the East Floodplain Planning Area PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Gari Thornhill Ron Molendyk Planner Manager City Manager BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1989, the City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance placing a forty-five (45) day moratorium on development approvals in the East Floodplain Planning Area (see attached Council Report with findings and exhibits describing the area). Previous to the adoption of this urgency ordinance, the Council on May 12, 1987, adopted a similar ordinance for the same planning area for a period of six (6) months. Under Section 65858 of the California Government Code, an interim ordinance may, after notice and hearing, be initially extended for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, and again, after the required notice of hearing, be subsequently extended for an additional twelve (12) months. The City Council, at the last meeting, adopted Ordinance No. 867, imposing a forty-five (45) moratorium on development proposals and directed staff to prepare the requested notices and set the ordinance for consideration of a time extension for a period of six (6) months. DISCUSSION This ordinance`, pursuant to the provisions of Section 65858, would provide for the extension of the Urgency Ordinance for a period not to exceed six (6) months. The required noticing, in accordance with State Law, has been carried out, and the matter set for public hearing. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt Interim Ordinance No. 868 , and the attached findings for a period of not to exceed six (6) months. i AGENDA REM NO. PAGE OF ORDINANCE N0. 868 AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM, ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN EAST FLOODPLAIN AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER, WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED BY A BOUNDARY ALONG r MISSION TRAIL AND CORYDON ROAD ON THE EAST; TO CEREAL STREET AROUND SKYLARK AIRPORT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS AND THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE CITY LIMITS TO THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY, THENCE NORTHERLY TO A LINE APPROXI- MATELY 1320 FEET NORTH OF SYLVESTER STREET THENCE EASTERLY FROM THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY TO THE SANJACINTO RIVER AND AROUND THE VONS SHOPPING CENTER TO LAKESHORE DRIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore did adopt an interim Ordinance No. 867, pursuant to Government Code Section 65952 on October 24, 1989; and,. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to extend said Ordinance for a period of six (6) months; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing on said extension and duly considered all evidence presented thereat; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. Any approvals of subdivisions, use permits, variances, design review approvals, or any other applicable entitlement for use which is required in order to comply with the zoning Ordinance shall be prohibited within the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter Area, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, until a land use plan for the entire Planning Area is adopted or this interim ordinance or subsequent extensions have expired. 2. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 3. Said subject ordinance is hereby extended six (6) months, and will cease to be effective on May 14, 1990. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE HEREBY FINDS THAT: 1. The City in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contem- plating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter area. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. AGENDA FiEM NO. � 0F � i Ordinance No. 3. Pursuant.to California government Code Section 65858 current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat to adversely impact elements of the contemplated plan, especial3 ly the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. ' R PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, upon th6 following roll call vote: AYES: r NOES: ABSENT: I ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney Ordinance No. November 14, 1989 -2- Jim Winkler, Mayor ACFKDA FTEM �— 4J LLJx rt7 S— Q Q I le �1r + '� +!. ' , r_• 1 j • . '� 't1'i• ,,j -.R �►a�► wirK„s: Sol r�L� ��-�t ' �� 1, � .'�r • 1;+r �l' `;. r7 :i.,• u � } y/� � � v� •` • r• E .• air: • �lr�;�' �.�:.,'� �,� o r J•T , • 1 tvC Y` ,• L r,pfl{,� •� �•:►'� �' ! '�•= .r.'• 'S�rti1tiS•\z \iti c6.' r � � f..- r_ ,�`' �• ''�..� it r- rx�ti .1� •�. r '�� J �J s► AGIMA REM NO.�, PAGE OF ' IF Mi �� pyx, {�l� � • + 47-�'� , •16 �I _' +• i`j' reg ��Y .1 L ' .01 '�'�is�•-•j.'1' �'! ';� �� `J+�-�_ .� `` - .' i 1ST }i Pf tai;.::;. L^�� - �—� t- 't � •� �{ }+ ' z•� w•.r.! ; } mow--- w-._ 4i � 1�'��+_-,{'"�_ 7! J_, I{ ,rte e i o z ;1 11 Q I le �1r + '� +!. ' , r_• 1 j • . '� 't1'i• ,,j -.R �►a�► wirK„s: Sol r�L� ��-�t ' �� 1, � .'�r • 1;+r �l' `;. r7 :i.,• u � } y/� � � v� •` • r• E .• air: • �lr�;�' �.�:.,'� �,� o r J•T , • 1 tvC Y` ,• L r,pfl{,� •� �•:►'� �' ! '�•= .r.'• 'S�rti1tiS•\z \iti c6.' r � � f..- r_ ,�`' �• ''�..� it r- rx�ti .1� •�. r '�� J �J s► AGIMA REM NO.�, PAGE OF ' IF Mi �� pyx, {�l� � • + 47-�'� , •16 �I _' +• i`j' reg ��Y .1 L ' .01 '�'�is�•-•j.'1' �'! ';� �� `J+�-�_ .� `` - .' i 1ST }i Pf tai;.::;. L^�� - �—� t- 't � •� �{ }+ ' z•� w•.r.! ; } mow--- w-._ 4i � 1�'��+_-,{'"�_ 7! J_, I{ ,rte • r� L a • ^ �t,-. r'�f • �� • - ems- r.,, � x .. �� •, , • '+: �!� � eR, ► .Ire - • � f :'� � E;�. = �� ' tom -..;mac— ��-� :,_ � � • � � �r� � J!• : / •tir ,a .{ rlwri irr�..,,s _ /.� �� 1� � 1, �:• ! 'tif ' 1;4 : ' ,�►- r:•�, 1' � .c��"1 � � � . •��,� 1 + � �r:-,`�� fel f � • :'t:�', •r �,� ��r�� lr . • f��• QTS I ��.t�'f� • •yF • ' f � 1�1�� i „ � •.� � t.,.�:; fir:=t+ �. � r•-1 �• . • � � ' ,ice �,i• � �y�ZS,}r;;`r :1�-�.�::! � .. `,• _ �� t� r 1'i,. �t:l� AGENDA ITEM N.O.-r.., �'- PAGE OF r PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES C - OCTOBER 24, 1989 Mayor Winkler questioned the size of the proposed park and whether it would still be a 30 acre park as originally discussed. Staff advised that there had been discussions about a 27 acre park. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-56 AND SPECIFY THE INCLUSION OF A 30 ACRE PARK IN THE DISTRICT. S.t-: L � 1 ts..n �_ _ r_i. t"_t_ i i" -L Com. ..r. -at2 .. n1 / CP\ _ �' .\1\C.111�JQ1VL 1\[.:� 114:11144 -tom w+ia`+�,L � 1 tC411 \++fit J Adoption of an Urgency Mitigation Fee Ordinance. Ordinance No. 866. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed prior considerations and discussions of this matter and advised that this is a temporary ordinance which will be considered as a public hearing on November 14. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 866 AND SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 14, 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 866 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, JOINING THE ESTABLISHED RIVERSIDE COUNTY STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN'STUDY AREA AND SETTING INTERIM MITIGATION FEES. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NONE NONE NONE 54. Ordinance No. 867 - Adontion of an Urgency Ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore adopting a Moratorium on Development Proposals on.Properties in the East Floodplain Planning Area. Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez assumed the chair. Planning Manager Thornhill advised that this Ordinance is an interim measurq until the public hearing is held.on November 14, 1989. City Manager Molendyk recommended that Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez be designated to sign this ordinance on behalf of the City Council. Councilman Washburn clarified that this Ordinance would also include the lake perimeter within City limits. Councilman Buck suggested that this Moratorium be adopted for the entire six months requested by Arvida Corporation for their Master Planning efforts. City Attorney Harper clarified that when this item is considered in Public Hearing it can be set for a time frame specific. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 867: AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE. OF 7 PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 24, 1989 ORDINANCE NO. 867 } f AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM, ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN EAST FLOODPLAIN AND CITY LAKE PERIMETEAr WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED BY A BOUNDARY ALONG MISSION^TRAIL AND CORYDON ROAD ON THE EAST; TO CEREAL STREET AROUND SKYLARK AIRPORT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS AND THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE CITY LIMITS TO THE STATE RECREATION AREA L^u+av+LK..1-+•T D�p1XTMIf 1i. V T v 1. 1�-- — n_�Tli FEET NORTH OF SYLVESTER STREET THENCE EASTERLY FROM THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY TO THE SAN JACINTO RIVER AND AROUND THE VONS SHOPPING CENTER TO LAKESHORE DRIVE. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUSINESS ITEMS . BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, NONE NONE WINKLER 55. Adoption of Seismic Hazard Program - Resolution No. 89-50.� Formation of Council Committee to Review Mitigation Programs. City Manager Molendyk explained that this action is required by the State prior to January 1, 1990. Councilman Washburn commented on the timing and importance of this item in relation to the recent 7.0 earthquake in San Francisco. He inquired with regard to notification of affected property owners. Staff advised that notification would follow adoption of this resolution. Mayor Winkler questioned the City's Liability/Responsibility with regard to this Program. City Attorney Harper advised that the adoption of this resolution is the only responsibility on the City. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-50 AND FORM A COUNCIL COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW OF MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES. 56. Ordinance No. 96-5 - Re1Gt na to Garage Sales. City Manager Molendyk advised that this ordinance was reviewed and updated per a request from Council and citizen concerns. Councilman Dominguez advised that he had been mainly concerned with the signage limitations, and this adequately addresses them. Councilman Starkey inquired how much leniency Code Enforcement would allow. City Manager Molendyk advised that the ordinance would be in effect 30 days from final adoption on November 14, 1989. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 865: ORDINANCE NO. 865 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE AGENDA ITEM NO_ 16 PAGE .OF e9�E CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE aSD REPORT TO COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: SEPTEMBER 12,E 1989 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE Ng.__--, CITY BF LAKE ELSINORE*' AN URGENCY ORDINANCE BF THE CITY BF LMKE ELSINORE ADOPTING A•MDRATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT ennQnvnis nN PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN PLANNING AREA WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED BY A BONDARY PLACING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELaPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE SOUTHEAST FLOOD PLAIN PLANNING AREA WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED BY A_ BOUNDARY ALONG MISSION TRAIL AND CORYDON ROAD ON THE EAST.- 10 CEREAL STREET AROUND SKYLARK AIRPORT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS AND THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE CITY LIMITS TO THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY THENCE NORTHERLY TO A LINE APPROXIMATELY 1320 FEET NORTH OF SY LVESTER STREET THENCE EASTERLY FROM THE STATE RECREATION AREA 80UNDARY TO THE SAN JACINTO RIVERS THENCE ALONG THE SAN JACINTO RIVER AND AROUND THE VONS SHOPPING CENTER TO LAKESHORE DRIVE. Prepared and Approved by: Ron Molendyk, City Manager and Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency BACKGROUND Pursuant to Cal ifdrnia Government Code Section 65858, an Interia'Urgency Ordinance prohibiting any uses which may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal may be adopted by a four-fifths (4/5th) vote for a period of forty-five (45) days. Subsequently, an Interim Ordinance may be extended for a maximum of two (2) years from the date of initial adoption following notice and a public hearing. This proposed moratorium is recommended (description as above) in order to provide uniform and consistent development around the lake shore. In order to do so, it is necessary that the City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency, prepare and adopt an amended General Plan for the area, including modified zoning and.4otential specific plan adoption. In order to fully assess the needs and provide safe and adequate access and other infrastructure to properties and potential facilities, including public recreation areas that are included with the Lake Management Plan, it is necessary to examine potential land uses within the Planning Area. A land use plan is also necessary to provide for protection of potentially significant wetlands areas. Incremental development, especially around the periphery of the Planning Area has the potential to adversely affect the provision of adequate access, infrastructure and services to this area and potentially conflict with appropriate land uses within the Planning Area. Therefore, it is necessary to temporarily suspend additional development approvals pending preparation of a revised land use and circulation plan for the Planning Area. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the findings and Ordinance No. extending a moratorium on new development approvals within the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter. 35'. qGE NDA ITEM NO. -- PAGE 2 C' 0E �— r ORDINANCE NO.�_ AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, r CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM, ON NEW DEVELOPMENT C APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN EAST FLOODPLAIN AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER, WHICH IS GENERALLY DEFINED [BY A BOUNDARY ALONG MISSION TRAIL AND CORYDON ROAD ON THE EAST; TO CEREAL STREET AROUND SKYLARK AIRPORT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS AND THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE CITY LIMITS TO TSE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY, THENCE NORTHERLY TO A LINT= APPROXI- MATELY 1320 FEE`f' N0Rf H 'OF SYLVES T EFR STREET HENCE EASTERLY FROM THE STATE RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY TO THE SAN JACINTO RIVER AND AROUND THE VONS SHOPPING CENTER TO LAKESHORE DRIVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE HEREBY FINDS THAT: 1. The City in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contem- plating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter area. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Pursuant to California government Code Section 65858 current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat to adversely impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: -n SECTION ONE. Any approvals of subdivisions, use permits, variances, design review approvals, or any other applicable entitlement for use which is required in order to comply with the zoning Ordinance shall be prohibited within the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter Area, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, until a land use plan for the entire Planning Area is adopted or this interim ordinance or subsequent extensions have expired. -1- AGENDA ITEM NO. _.,3. '> PAGE M - • O F ? 0 C Report to Council/RDA -2- September 12, 1989 It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. Findings: 1. The City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment ecy for i5 contemplating ntemast Flating in the development of a land use and plan and City Lake Perimeter. 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat to adversely impTct elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. AGENDAITEM h1Q. � - 1 PACE . a I F o� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RON MOLENDYK CITY MANAGER" DATE,; _ .. JANUARY 9, 1.9 9 0 SUBJECT: TUSCANY HILLS PROJECT - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24383, 25074 THRU 25080 As you recall, Council continued action on the Tuscany Hills Project to provide the applicant, staff and Councilmembers Buck and Washburn an opportunity to meet and discuss Council concerns regarding the project. Community Development Direc-t-or Gunderman has met with Councilmembers Buck and Mashburn and with Homestead Development representatives to identify and address the primary issues. Homestead has provided revised plans for staff and Council review on January 4, 1990. However, staff and Council - members Buck and Washburn have not had an opportunity to effectively review these revisions. Staff feels the issues can be resolved by your January 9, 1990 meeting. However, comments regarding those revisions will not be ready for distribution in your packets. Staff will forward comments to you as soon as they have been formulated. 3 AGENDA ITEM r!o. _ PAGE OF� REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 9, 1990 SUBJECT: ADOPT A TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PREPARED BY: RAPPROVED: ` ay 'Donnell Ron Kirchner Senior Civil Engineer Director of Public Services APPROVED: Ron Mole dyk City Manager BACKGROUND The City is in the midst of rapid growth and this growth is creating increases in traffic and congestion. In order to respond to the traffic impacts of growth in the City; the City has begun a Traffic Impact Program. SUMMARY Several months ago, the City hired LSA Consultants to develop a study to establish a roadway fee. For the purpose of this study, extensive land use and roadway facility databases were adapted or developed to quantify these parameters for the City of Lake Elsinore. The land use database used in this study was an adaptation of the City of Lake Elsinore's database. The land use database was expanded to include a detailed inventory of the number of existing dwelling units and the acreage currently developed with non-residential land uses. The determination of the existing development coupled with the General Plan Land use designations, provided the quantification of the future development. Under the City's existing General Plan Designations, approximately 5,400 acres of land remain for single family home development, 200 acres for multi -family development, 1,350 acres for various commercial uses and approximately 400 acres for industrial uses. The roadway facilities database used in this study is the result of an extensive inventory of the existing arterial network. The existing inventory identified the existing right of way, pavement widths, recent arterial improvements, and any unusual geological features for each segment of roadway. With the existing features known for each roadway segment, the improvements necessary to upgrade each facility to its General Plan ultimate alignments were identified. Detailed cost estimates were calculated based on these identified improvements which included road and curb construction, grading and landscaping requirements and thirty (30) percent of the right of way acquisition. All alignments and cross sections were based on the standard specifications from the County of Riverside Standard Plans. AGENnA ITEM PAGE 0,;: REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Jansta.ry 9, 1990 Page Two The summation of the roadway segment cost estimates indicates that improving the City's arterial network to the ultimate General Plan alignments requires $62,923,586 in improvements. To determine the appropriate fees to be assessed based on the relative impacts to the arterial network, the arterial construction costs are divided proportionately among the land uses in accordance with the trips to be generated. The build -out of the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan to a balanced conmunity will result in an increase of 189,000 trips associated with the residential land uses and approximately 231,000 trips associated with the non-residential land uses. Therefore, of the 420,000 new trips being generated, the residential land uses will be generating'forty-five (45) percent of these trips and the non-residential land uses will be generating the remaining fifty-five (55) percent. The residential land uses will be responsible for forty-five (45) percent of the total cost of the arterial improvements, or $28,315,614. For residential land uses, the fees are assessed by trip and given that the future residential developments will generate 189,000 trips, the fee per residential trip is $150 per trip. For a single family home with an industry standard of ten trip ends per dwelling unit, the recommended fee is $1,500 per new dwelling unit. For the multi -family home with seven trip ends per dwelling unit, the recommended fee to be assessed is $1,050 per dwelling unit. The non-residential land uses will be responsible for fifty-five (55) percent of the total cost of the arterial improvements or $34,607,972. Considering that there are 1,750 acres of land to be developed with non-residential land use designations, it is recommended that each acre of non-residential development be assessed $19,750 per acre. The developers, as well as the City, will benefit from this Road Fee Program. With funding identified to make arterial improvements, development in outlying areas can now happen more readily and with greater ease of mobility. The Road Fee Program offers a developer the opportunity to make arterial improvements adjacent to the project of equal benefit to the City; the City would thereby allow a fee credit commensurate with the arterial improvements constructed. It may be desirable to allow discretionary credits as decided by City Council. There may be a situation where a development or a Land Use Element is recognized as desirable by the City Council and, to provide encouragement, the City may want to reduce the fees on these developments. The Road Fee Program would be enacted by the passing of a City Ordinance and the adoption of a City Council Resolution. FISCAL IMPACT Increase revenue for public Works Improvements in the major thoroughfares. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the Ordinance for establishing the traffic Impact Fee. 2. Adopt the Resolution for establishing policy and procedure for the implementation of the Traffic Impact Fee. PAGE 1L GF -1L____ EXHIBIT "I" LAND USE DESIGNATION TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Residential Land Use Single Family Multi -Family Non -Residential Land Use $ 1,500 per dwelling unit $ 1,050 per dwelling unit $19,750 per acre AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE Or ORDINANCE NO. gS-,?, LAKE ELSINORE AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of Lake Elsinore as follows: SECTION I. , Chapter ,16 of _the City Code is amenr3Pr3by ar3r7,inr1T _ Section 16.36.090 to read as follows: SECTION 16.36.090. Traffic Impact Fees A. Authority and Purpose (1) Authority. These fees are adopted pursuant to the Police Power, in accordance with the powers and limitations established by Government Code Section 50076 and Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution. (2) Purpose. New development occurring within the corporate limits of the City of Lake Elsinore and in areas adjacent to the City has increased traffic congestion on major thoroughfares within the City. The traffic impacts of such new development are not limited to the immediate vicinity of the new development but have an impact upon the major thoroughfares and bridge improvements throughout the City. In order to ensure that new development contributes toward offsetting the burden it imposes upon City's traffic system, it is necessary that an equitable fee and administrative program be established. B. Traffic Infrastructure Improvement Program. A program to accomplish the purposes set forth in Section A is hereby established and shall be known as the Traffic Infrastructure Improve- ment Program. Traffic Infrastructure Improvement Program shall include improvements to major thoroughfares (arterial, major, secondary and modified secondary highways, and modified collector streets) as defined in the Circulation Element on the latest adopted General Plan. C. Administrative Program - Fees. The details of, and the fees for, the Traffic Infrastructure Improvement Program shall be as adopted by the City Council by Resolution. A ;'EfsOA 11'EM PAGE OF D. Definitions. The following terms shall mean: (1) "New development" includes: (a) New construction which generates additional traffic impacts to those generated by the previous use of the land; (b) Conversion of one use to a new use when the new use generates an additional traffic impact; (c) Expansion of an existing use at its current location or at a different location; (d) A new use in an existing structure when the previous use relocates to a parcel with ingress and egresss identical to the previous location (regardless of intensity of traffic use) : A use which relocates to another location having the same ingress and egress as the previous location shall not be considered as "new development", unless the relocation results in an expansion of the use, in which case only the expansion of the use shall be considered as "new development"; (e) Any other use upon conditions imposed by a discretionary entitlement that the use pay a Traffic Impact Fee. (2) "Off Site": Anything outside the boundaries of a development. (3) "Traffic Infrastructure Improvements": Includes transportation planning, preliminary engineering, engineering design studies, land surveys, right-of-way acquisitions, engineering, issuance of permits, and construction of all the necessary features for any street construction project including, without limitation: (a) Construction of new streets; (b) Construction of new through lanes; AGENDA ITEM NO. (c) Construction of new turn lanes; (d) Construction of new bridges; (e) Construction of new drainage facilities in conjunction with street or bridge construction or improvement; (f) Purchase and installation of traffic signalization (i nrrl „r1.; n jr rnPw anti upgrading signalization) (g) Construction of curbs, medians, landscaping, five city entry signs and shoulders; (h) Relocation of utilities to accommodate street or bridge construction or improvements; and (i) All street and intersection capacity enhancements, including extensions, widening, intersection improvements, and improvement of pavement conditions. E. Fees - Indexing. (1) The fee levels established by Section C shall be adjusted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Code. (2) The fees established by Section C may be revised periodically by the City Council to reflect current conditions. F. Exceptions (1) Residential Development (a) Payment of such fees shall not be required for: The alteration or enlargement of an existing building or structure or the erection of one or more buildings c structures accessory thereto, or both, on the same lot or parcel of land; provided, the total value, as determined by the Director of Building, of all such alteration, enlargement or construction completed within any one year period does not exceed one-half of the current market value, as determined by the Director of Building, of all existing building on such lot or parcel of land, and the alteration or enlargement of the building is not such as to change its classification of occupancy as defined by Section 501 of the Uniform Building Code. AC =ND I T EM it 0. -3-7- PAGE O (b) The following accessory buildings and structures: private garages, children's playhouses, radio and television receiving antennas, windmills, silos, tank houses, shops, barns, coops and other buildings which are accessory to one -family or two-family dwellings. G. Use of Revenue. The Finance Officer shall establish a separate fund for the Traffic Impact Fees.. Expenditures from said fund shall be used only in accordance with the purpose for which the fund was established. H. Collection of Fees - Penalty. (1) For residential development which require a building permit, these fees shall be paid before issuance of a building permit, and no building permit shall be issued until the fees are paid. (2) For non-residential developments, these fees shall be paid before issuance of a building permit, and no building permit shall be issued until the fees are paid. (3) For new development or new parcel or tract map not requiring a building permit, these fees shall be paid prior to the initiation of the new use or new map. (4) Violation of this article is a misdemeanor. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from and after its adoption. SECTION III. The Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore is hereby directed to cause this Ordinance to be published by one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City of Lake Elsinore, and hereby designated for that purpose by said Council of Lake Elsinore. AGEP�DA ITal N10. L-..- INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this day of January 1990, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this day of , upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: Jim Winkler, Mayor ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney i'ACE� 0r....��.... RESOLUTION NO. q 0 - I A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR COLLECTION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WHEREAS THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE has adopted Ordinance No. �. authorizing Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Fees and requiring the adoption of a resolution establishing administrative procedures and implementation of the ordinance; and WHEREAS as new development occurs within the corporate limits of the City and in areas adjacent to the City, increased traffic congestion is occurring on major thoroughfares identified in the infrastructure improvements for the circulation element on the latest adopted General Plan, made a part hereof; and WHEREAS the traffic impacts of the new development are not limited to the immediate vicinity of such new development, but have an impact on major thoroughfares in and adjacent to the City; and WHEREAS this resolution shall repeal Resolutions 83-19, 83- 49, 83-61, and Section 3 and 5 of Resolution 77-39. WHEREAS the City has been able to determine from professional traffic studies for various projects, the anticipated traffic impacts generated by commercial, office, and residential developments on the City's major thoroughfares and the cost to the City to offset the burden imposed by these new developments upon said major thoroughfares; and WHEREAS, based upon said studies, City staff has been able to determine a method for computing the amount of contribution which each type of development should make to the City in order to assist the City in alleviating traffic congestion generated by each new development on the City's major thoroughfares; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a policy which will reflect a fair contribution to the City for traffic impacts of developments; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A policy for traffic impact fees for traffic infrastructure improvements is hereby established. r,o="mDA ITEM -D PAGc ��-- SECTION 2. The Traffic Impact Fee shall be collected on a city-wide basis for any new development; for any conversion of use or expansion of existing development, regardless of the character of the development, based upon the following: 1. The amount of the fee shall be $150.00 for each daily trip as dei^ed a n-Ler.,tc i w r. i. � L T LL_ i 1 L ;_ f: d e::�:....::L�,...,,, 1.. y11111,..1V 1, QC.�.nV11CU IYCLCT''1.C7 ciI1C.1 made a part: hereof. 2. If a developer constructs traffic or street improvements for an off-site major thoroughfare which is shown on the traffic infrastructure plan, City may accept said construction as an alternative to payment of all or part of the traffic fees payable by said developer. Such alternative means of complying with the traffic impact fee requirement, and the amount of credit and reimbursement allowed shall be established by an agreement, approved by the Director of Public Services, and must be approved prior to issuance of any permit for development. The reimbursement allowed each year will not exceed 30% of the total year end fund balance. 3. No additional fee established by this policy shall be required for development which generates an amount of traffic which is equal to or less than the traffic generated by a previously approved project on the same site, if the prior or the present property owner constructed the off-site improvements or paid fees required by this policy for that prior development. 4. If development will result in an increase in the amount of traffic generated at a specific site, the developer shall be en-itled to credit for the amount of fees paid and for traffic or street improvements constructed in accordance with this policy for - the prior use. If the prior use did not pay any fees or make any street improvements in accordance with this policy, then no credit shall be allowed. 5. In implementing this policy, the Director of Public Services shall be responsible for the final determiniation of the amount of credit, or the estimated cost of construction. If the developer disagrees with staff valuation of the cost of AGENDA ITEM NO. ,..2-2. PAGED? OF,_,GL 6. A developer shall not be entitled to any waiver, reduction, or credit to the Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Fee for any improvements not on the major thoroughfares as defined by the ordinance. SECTION 3. All funds received shall be forwarded to the ccnn c ti+; or .ic„ni+ intn A raf-c ar_.Crn7r1t- Ct aside �nance Department int f _-�-�__ - -- - -� --- - - - -- - P- solely for Traffic Impact Fees. SECTION 4. The Traffic Impact Fee schedule shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the most current Engineering News Record construction cost index in order to offset the effect of inflation. Annual changes shall be effective on July 15 of each year, based upon the index change for the twelve months ending on April 30 of that year. 1. The Traffic Impact Fee schedule shall be reviewed by the City Council no less than once every three years to reflect changes in traffic and project needs. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of January 1990 upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: Jim Winkler, Mayor ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk ( SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE • January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Industrial Project 89-9: Herron and Rumansoff Architects (Archer Roofing); a request for approval of an Industrial Project for offices in conjunction with a tile roofing company on 1.16 acres located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 150 feet north of Collier. (2 PREPARED BY: G�" APPROVED BZt� D B ; Matk o des Davme,G Lnderman R n Molend Consulti%g Planner Co JDev. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND This project received Planning Commission approval on December 20, 1989, after several preliminary reviews conducted by Staff. The Industrial Project and approved Conditional Use Permit for outside storage received Commission approval after some discussion concerning planning conditions numbers 7, 8a and 8b. Condition number 7 was made to state that the applicant shall connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of the property, also that a soils report and sewage plan be approved by the County Health Department. Condition number 8a concerns landscape bonding and the submittal of final landscape plans. Conditions 8b contains standard language concerning the screening of mechanical and roof top equipment. DISCUSSION The proposal is for a 1,818 square foot storage and office building on 1.16 acres. Sufficient landscaping is proposed to provide adequate screening along all sides of the project. The site is not visible from the freeway. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was required for the proposed outside storage. The project as approved by the Planning Commission meets all the requirements for a CUP. Staff recommends adding condition number 9, and re -numbering the remainder of the conditions, for a slumpstone block wall along the front of the parcel (excluding building and gate areas) with material to match the proposed structure. Condition Number 9: Prior to issuance of Building permits applicant shall submit a site plan reflecting the addition of a seven (7) foot high wall along the Riverside Drive elevation. Said wall shall be placed wherever proposed fencing is located along the Riverside Drive elevation. Said wall shall be constructed of decorative masonary block to match approved building materials. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 89-39, and approve Industrial Project 89-9 based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of condition number 9. AGENDA ITEM NO. 51 PAGE f , OF- �— Page 2 January 9, 1990 Subject: Industrial Project 89-9: Herron and Rumansoff Architects (Archer Roofing) It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. Findings 1. The proposed request will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The site for the proposed request is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use. 3. The proposed buildings continue the same design as the existing units and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the Planning District in which the site is located. AGENDA ITEM No. _aL_ PAGE OF q CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-9 Planning Division F 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued ki,thin one (1) year. 2. Applicant shall meet allrOonditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate��of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the i___ _�1 r1- A L pians date stamped December 1, 1589, and -v as �«�u��u Z__ these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 4. Meet all Riverside County Fire Department requirements. 5. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of fixture. No wall pack units shall be permitted. 6. A final grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the Chief Building Official. 7. Project must connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of applicant's property, and applicant shall post security to ensure compliance. Prior to the issuance of building permits applicant shall submit a soils report which includes a sewage disposal plan approved by the Riverside County Health Department. 8. Applicant shall cause to be constructed a seven -foot (71) high vinyl coated chainlink fence along the perimeter of the parcel (excluding the front). The side facing Collier shall be black, the side facing opposite (freeway side) and the and rear of the parcel shall be green. Tennis court type screen shall be placed inside and attached to the fence, in a color to match the vinyl coating of the chainlink. a) All landscape improvements to be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/ac- ceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for one (1) year. Final Landscaping plans for the entire project shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Landscape :--Architect and the Community Development Director. One (1) additional tree to be provided adjacent to the building along the west elevation. b) All air conditioning equipment and other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be roof mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall be screened. - Engineering Department Conditions 9. All public works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 10. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. 11. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34, Resolution No. 85-26). r AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF_A_ rf _ r C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED 12. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for building permit. 13. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34). 14. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer and improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department standards and City Codes (LEMC 16.34 and 12.04). 15. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 16. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 17. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 18. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 19. Applicant shall contribute $2,600 towards the design and construction for a traffic signal at the intersection of Collier Avenue and Riverside Drive. Development will increase traffic volume at intersection at least 2% and should contribute 2% of cost for the signal. 20. Applicant shall contribute $116.00 towards the City Master Entryway Sign Program. 21. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works/street improvements as established for the project by the City Engineer. 22. Applicant shall== --obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of a grading permit. 23. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 24. Applicant shall cooperate with Riverside County Flood Control District for the construction of the Arroyo Del Toro Channel and dedicated drainage easements that are reasonable and necessary for the construction of the channel. AGENDA ITEM NO...,�,.. RAGE. OF_q__ r _ l Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 4 .'f I SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES: 317 q,,219 SCRIVENER; 1507 SUMNER; 320 LEWIS SELECT HOUSING CONTINUED' Single -Family Residence - 120 Lewis Street - Select Housing - A request to construct a 1,821 square foot single -story dwelling situated on a 9,000 square foot lot, located at the southeast corner of Pottery and Lewis Street. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Brad Pomeroy, questioned the condition on masonry walls for corner lots, condition number 15 on 320 Lewis, 319 Scrivener and 1507 Sumner, and the ten -foot dedication on 319 Scrivener and 320 Lewis, condition number 25 and 26 respectively. Considerable discussion was held on masonry walls for corner lots and fencing; the ten -foot dedication, conditions 25 and 26, and moving the house toward the rear of the property; sewer connection, and the material to be used for support pier foundation. Motion by Commissioner Wilsey to approve Single -Family Residences at: 317 Scrivener; 319 Scrivener; 1507 Sumner, and 320 Lewis based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 AT THIS TIME, 7:55 P.M., THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECESSED. AT THIS TIME, 8:02 P.M., THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECONVENED. 5. Industrial Project 89-9 - Herron & Rumansoff - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a request to construct a single 1,818 square foot building on 1.16 acres. The project is located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 125 feet north of Collier Avenue. Planning Manager Thornhill requested that one additional tree be planted adjacent to the building, utilized posted rendering to illustrate location, and this tree shall be selected from the City's Street Tree List. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Russell Rumansoff, of Herron Rumansoff, commented on condition number 7, project connecting to sewer, and requested that they be allowed to install and use a septic system for approximately two months. In discussion with staff they have indicated that sewer will be installed approximately mid -year 1990, and we anticipate the project to be completed about May or June, 1990. Mr. Rumansoff then commented on condition number 24, pertaining to construction of the Arroyo Del Toro Channel and drainage easements, and requested that they be allowed to work with staff, between now and the City Council hearing, on this. Chairman Brown commented on condition number 7, recommending that language be added that the applicant shall connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of his property, and posting security to ensure compliance. Commissioner Gilenson recommended that the standard language for septic system be added to condition number 7; the standard language for landscape bonding be added as condition number 8.a; commented on condition number 24, pertaining to drainage easements and who determines what is reasonable and nece nary. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF q I Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1989 Page 5 INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-9 - HERROft & RUMANSOFF CONTINUED y:. r; Commissioner Brinley commented on the screening of air con- ditioning equipment and recommended that the standard language for screening of said equipment be added as condition number 8.b. Chairman Brown commented on the overhang and starkness of walls and carrying the same color theme around the building with a band. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-39 and approval of Industrial Project 89-9 based on the Findings and subject to the 24 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with the following amendments: Condition No. 7: "Project must connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of appli- cant's property, and applicant shall post security to ensure compliance. Prior to issuance of building permits applicant shall submit a soils report which includes a sewage disposal plan approved by Riverside County Health Department." Condition No. 8.a: "All landscape improvements to be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and re- leased at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/ac- ceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for one year. Final Landscaping Plans for the entire project shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's landscape Architect and the Community Development Director. One (1) additional tree to be provided adjacent to the building along the west elevation." 8.b: "All air conditioning equipment and other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be roof mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall be screened. second by Commissioner Brinley. Approved 5-0 6. Residential Project 88-5 Revised - Century American - Planning Manager Thornhill presented an application to consider Minor Design Review for a 144 unit apartment complex, which was approved by City Council on March 14, 1989. The revised project contains only minor differences from the original; however, now, the project is proposed to be converted to condominiums. The project is located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin. Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing the applicant and if there were any concerns. Mr. Robert Long, Century American, gave a brief background report on the proposal; stated that they concur with staff AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OE—i�.. r PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO PLANNING POMMISSION Public Hearing CUR 89-6 I 89-9 December 20, 1989 PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY•1 ROVED BY• r oades ary Thornhill Dave underman Con tact Planner City Planner Co Dev. Dir. OWNER/ APPLI CANT Herron & Rumansoff Architects 530 St. John's Place Hemet, California 92343 REQUESTED USE Design Review and Conditional Use Permit for an office and outside storage. SIZE AND LOCATION 1.16 acres located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 150 feet north of Collier. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site - North - East - South - West - BACKGROUND EXISTING LAND USE Vacant Industrial Vacant Vacant Mini -Storage Facility _In ZONING GENERAL PLAN M-2 Limited Manufacturing M-2 Limited Manufacturing M-2 Limited Manufacturing C -M Commercial Manufacturing M-2 Limited Manufacturing This project was first brought to staff's attention in April of 1989 for preliminary review. Comments were returned, and a second proposal was brought to staff's attention for another preliminary review. This second preliminary review was completed in August. The current project was submitted October 11, 1989. ANALYSIS The proposed elevations and site plan are a redesign of the original project submittal. The redesigned site plans are based on recommendations made to the applicant by staff. The proposal is for a single 1,818 square foot building on 1.16 acres of land. The proposed office use is consistent with the M-2 Zone and General Plan designation of Limited Manufacturing. The proposed outside storage of concrete roof tiles requires a Conditional Use Permit which is included in a subsequent portion of this Staff Report. AGENDA ITEM NO. 51 - - PAGE 3 OF Cl The proposed building will be painted off-white, with stucco of walls. The fascia will be front office area will consist bronze wi-nd-low panels. C Public Hearing CUP 89-6 I 89-9 December 20, 1989 Page 2 :t constructed of decorat've slump block inset areas to break up the expanse painted a Carmine Red. The proposed of dark bronze aluminum framing with The proposed landscaping is sufficient. Perimeter screening is provided by a seven foot high fence- coated with green vinyl. Eucalyptus trees will be planted every twenty feet on center. Staff recommends that green tennis court screen be placed inside the fence along the sides of. the project. Sufficient parking has been provided with 35 spaces, based on one (1) space for every 1,000 square feet of storage area. The current proposal is well designed and landscaped. The architecture and site screening are sensitive to surrounding proposed and existing uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-6 The proposed Conditional Use Permit is to consider a proposal for an outside storage area in conjunction with offices for a roofing company. The proposed storage is incidental and secondary to the office use. The storage area is screened by a seven -foot (71) high fence coated with green vinyl. Staff recommends that tennis court type screening be placed inside and attached to the fencing. Proposed along the inside perimeter of the storage area is a five-foot landscape buffer with Eucalyptus Nicholii planted every 20 feet on center. This screening will be to mitigate visual concerns from all perspectives, including the freeway and from Collier Avenue. No materials will be stored above fence height. This project, as conditioned, will have no significant impact on surrounding uses. An Initial Environmental Assessment has been prepared for this project and identified no significant impacts. A Negative Declaration is recommended. RECOP•EJENDATION Staff recommends. that the Planning Commission adopt Negative Declaration 89-39 and approve Conditional Use Permit 89-6, and recommend to the -eity Council approval of Industrial Project 89-9 and adoption of Negative Declaration 89-39 based on the fallowing Findings and Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The proposed request will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The site for the proposed request is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use. 3. The proposed buildings continue the same design as the existing units and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.-070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the Planning District in which the site is located. AGENDA ITEM Na. �f i'AGE 3, 01 0 A Ch VERSIDE - - PAGE a OF �n 1 VERSIDE - - PAGE a OF ORDINANCE NO. 878 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 1.24 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND JOY AVENUE, FROM C -P (COMMERCIAL PARK DISTRICT) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) (ZONE CHANGE 89-15 - IRVANI/BROWN). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION The Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: A.P. #377-060-006 - PORTION OF LOT 241 A.P. #377-060-009 - LOTS 237, 238 & 239 BLK B A.P. #377-060-012 - A.P. #370-070-004 - PORTION LOT 15 BLK F A.P. #377-070-008 - PORTION LOT 247 A.P. #377-070-011 - PORTION LOT 246 A.P. #377-070-012 - PORTION LOT 246 A.P. #377-070-019 - PORTION LOT 247 BLK B A.P. #377-070-022 - PORTION LOT 251 A.P. #377-070-024 - PORTION LOT 251 A.P. #377-070-028 - from C -P (Commercial Park District) to C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District on approximately 1.24 acres, as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and the said real property shall hereafter be subject to the provisions and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance relating to property located within such C-2 Zoning District. Approval is based on the following: 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the proj ect . 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the General Plan designation. 3. Government Code Section 65860 requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. 4. Although the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the proposed General Plan Designation a finding of associated environmental impacts can not be made. AGENDA iTE::i N'0- ---4i; ,.. PAGEOF 0 — SECTION TWO: This ordinance shall become effective as provided by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 26th day of December, 1989 , upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this day of , upon the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John R. Harper, City Attorney Jim Winkler, Mayor AGENDA ITEM NO.—�- PAGE'' OF—�— A G E N D A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1990 POLICY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: "Only those items filed with }he ecretary Os yeC ��... i��...��.VC:�v�iiiL'i�i. ��I�y by i cjon oo I_ueSady, prior to the following Tuesday meeting, will be considered by the Agency at said meeting." 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved on one motion unless a Boardmember requests separate action on a specific item. A. Minutes 1. December 26, 1989 - Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. B. Warrant List - December 29, 1989. C. Elsinore Lakeside Investors — 84 — Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds — Assumption Agreement. D. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281 — Century American (R.C. Hobbs Co.). E. Tentative Parcel Map 25347 - Centex Homes. F. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 & Zone Change 89-7 - Rancon Realty Fund IV. G. Ordinance No. 881 - Expanding the Moratorium Area around the Lake Perimeter and East Floodplain Planning Area. H. Industrial Project 89-9 - Herron and Rumansoff Architects (Archer Roofing). PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS A. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Arvida Company. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT RECOMMENDATION Approve Ratify. Approve Agmt. Concur with Council Action. Concur With Council__ Action. Concur With Council Action. Concur with Council Action. Concur With Council Action. Approve Agmt. MINUTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 1989 ****************************************************************** 1. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Washburn at lu:iu P.M. 2. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and Clerk of the Board Kasad. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman Washburn requested that the record reflect his abstention on Item C. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. A. The following Minutes were approved: 1. December 12, 1989 - Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. B. Approved Agreement with County Flood Control District. C. Approved Owner Participation Agreement with Glen Investors, Inc. D. Concurred with Council Action to Continue Tentative Parcel Map 24571 & Zone Change 89-7 - Rancon Realty Fund IV, for two weeks. E. Concurred with Council Action to Approve Zone Change 89-15 & Commercial Project 89-5, as amended, for Doctor H. Irvani/Kenneth Brown. F. Concurred with Council Action to Refer Tentative Parcel Map 25157 - Bainbridge Investment, Inc., back to the Planning Commission with concerns. G. Concurred with Council Action to Continue the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan to the January 9, 1990 City Council Meeting. H. Concurred with Council Action to Continue Tentative Tract Map Nos. 25074, 25075, 25076, 25077, 25078, 25079, 25080 and 24383 - Tuscany Hills, to January 9, 1990. I. Concurred with Council Action to Approve Industrial Project 89-10 for Lytle Creek Partners. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. AGENDA 17EM NG. 3 , PAGE DF PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989 5. NEW BUSINESS None. 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT Executive Director Molendyk advised that the agreement approved as Item #3.c. would start the process for the new outlet mall to be built at I-15 and Nichols Road, which should be ready for opening in Spring of 1991. 7. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS None. 8. CLOSED SESSION None. 9. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 10:12 P.M. ATTEST: VICKI KASAD CLERK OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GARY M. WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AdENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE a OF LAKE ELSINORE-RDA 90-061 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. PAYEE IUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED N0. DESCRIPTION AMERICAN EXPRESS CO. BALLEW & ASSOCIATES, INC. WILLIAM S. BUCK FRED DOMINGUEZ FINAL TOUCH MARKETING HARPER & BURNS PETER J. LEHR R.J.M. DESIGN GROUP, INC. BILL STARKEY STOORZA, ZIEGUAS & METZGER, GARY WASHBURN JIM WINKLER CHASE VILLANUEVA B-1 ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. PAGE NO. 12/29/8` DATE WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 1226 32.01. 1253 5365.3: 1254 60.0 1 asS 60.0 1238 2069.2 1213 85.0 125 3000.0 1212 1187.0 125 60.0 1225 493.4 1255 60.0 125 60.0 1198 16350.0 1239 36000.0 DA ITEM N , _% PAGE OF LAKE ELSINORE-RDA 90-061 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. PAYEE ]UCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED N0. L -- DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D RECAP BY FUND OPERATING FUND - AREA I 910 CONSTRUCTION FUND - AREA 911 OPERATING FUND - AREA II 920 CONSTRUCTION FUND - AREA 921 OPERATING FUND - AREA 11 1930 PAGE NO. DATE 12/29/8' IkV NO. AMOUNT NO. WRITTEN PREPAID ACCRUED TOTAL PRE -PAID 52389.01 1187.00 39.01 .00 2601.65 AGENDA ITEM PAGc -Ze- WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN AMOUNT 8f .3' 56216.6' .0 64882.0 WRITTEN 1160.4 1584.1 1160.4 3000.0 1760.4 REPORT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: JANUARY 9 1990 SUBJECT: Elsinore Lakeside Investors - 84 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds - Assumption Agreement. PREPARED BY:ROVED Ray wood, Admin. Ran Molendyk, Services Director Executive Director BACKGROUND: In October 1985 the Redevelopment Agency approved and issued $5,000,000 principal amount of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for the construction of the Lakeside Apartments on Lincoln Avenue, west of the Lake. The original developer was Elsinore Lakeside Investors -84. The Bonds were secured by a letter of credit (collateralized by assets) issued by Mercury Savings and Loan Association. The project was required to provide not less than 20% of the units to low and moderate income tenants. Elsinore Lakeside Investors -84 has entered into an agreement to sell its interest in the project to Fred E. and Virginia Van Horne, who will assume all obligations pertaining to the Bonds and the low and moderate housing restrictions. The Van Hornes have been approved as borrowers by Mercury Savings and Loan Association; the letter of credit will remain in place. The trustee has indicated that the project is in compliance with the requirements of the Regulatory Agreement. The Assumption Agreement deals with these issues. Bond Counsel is willing to deliver an opinion that the transfer will not affect the tax -exemption of the Bonds as required by the Regulatory Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the Assumption Agreement. AGENDA ITEM NO. , C, PAGE OF Draft dated 12-21-89 -- Marked To Changes From the Prior Draft ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT This Assumption Agreement (the "Agreement") is dated as of December 1989 by and among Elsinore Lakeside Investors -84, a California limited partnership (the "Original Developer"), Fred E. Van Horne and Virginia H. Van Horne (the "Assuming Developers"), the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Redevelopment Agency"), Mercury Savings and Loan Association,- a California savings and loan association (the "Association"), and Seattle -First National Bank, a rational banking association (the "Trustee"), with reference to the following: WHEREAS, on October 31, 1985, the Redevelopment Agency issued its $5,000,000 variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds 1985 Series A (the "Bonds") pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Indenture"), and loaned the proceeds thereof to the Original Developer to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Lakeside Apartment Project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, the Original Developer entered into a: (i) Loan Origination and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Loan Agreement"), among the Redevelopment Agency, the Trustee, the Association, and the Original Developer; (ii) Project Disbursement Agreement (Construction and Permanent), dated as of October 1, 1985, between the Association and the Original Developer; (iii) Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985, among the Original Developer, the Trustee and the Association; (iv) Deed of Trust with Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement with Fixture Failing (Construction and Permanent Loan), dated as of October 1,-1985 (the "Deed of Trust"), given by the Original Developer in favor of the Association and the Trustee as co-beneficiaries;.(v) Security Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985, given by the Original Developer in favor of the Association and the Trustee collectively as secured parties; (vi) Assignment of Lessor's Interest in Leases, dated as of October 1, 1985, given by the Original Developer in favor of the Association and the Trustee collectively as assignee; (vii) Assignment of Contracts (Construction), dated as of October 1, 1985, given by the Original Developer in favor of the Trustee and the Association collectively as assignee; (viii) Assignment of Contracts (Architectural and Engineering), dated as of October 1, 1985, made by the Original Developer in favor of the Association and the Trustee; (ix) Assignment of Plans and Specifications, dated as of October 1, 1985, made by the Original Developer in favor of the Association and the Trustee; (x) TENR Service and Remarketing Agreement, dated as of 7198D AGENDA ITEM N0. PAGE OF October 1, 1985, among the Redevelopment Agency, the Association, Bankers Trust Company, as Remarketing Agent, and the Original Developer; (xi) Letter of Credit Note, dated as of October 1, 1985, issued by the Original Developer in favor of the Association; (xii) Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, dated as of October 1, 1985, among the Redevelopment Agency, the Trustee and the Original Developer; and (xiii) Tender Agent Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 among the Trustee, the Association, the Original Developer, and J. Henry Schroder Bank and Trust Company, as Tender Agent (the Bank of New York is the successor Tender Aaent_ to tbP J, velli �C rcnroeder Bank) (the documents described as items (i) through (xzi`i) above are referred to herein as the Dm�TelcrQT- roar Documents"); and r WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize that there are certain ongoing federal income tax requirements which must be complied with in order to maintain the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from federal income taxation; and WHEREAS, the Original Developer will convey all of Original Developer's right, title, and interest in and to the Project by Grant Deed, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, to the Assuming Developers; and WHEREAS, Section 5.2 of the Loan Agreement provides that the Original Developer may not convey any part of the Project without the prior written consent of the Association and of the Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, paragraph 4(b) of the Deed of Trust provides that the Original Developer may not convey any part of the Project without the prior written consent of the Association; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Assuming Developers hereby acknowledge that prior to their execution of this Agreement they have: (i) received and reviewed to their satisfaction copies of each Developer Loan Document and (ii) consulted legal counsel regarding their execution of this Agreement, to the extent they deemed necessary. 2. The Assuming Developers hereby assume all such rights, duties, obligations and liabilities of the Original Developer, and agree to be bound by the terms, covenants and conditions in, the Developer Loan Documents, as though the Assuming Developers were original signatories to each and every one of the Developer Loan Documents. Upon consummation of the -2- AGENDA ITEM NO, 3 r PAGE OF--(O— transfer of the Project, the Original Developer shall be released of all its Obligations under the Developer Loan Documents except for the Original Developer's obligation to post a letter of credit in favor of the Association in the sum of $750,000. Once the Assuming Developers have delivered to the Association a letter of credit in a form and amount and from a financial institution acceptable to the Association, the Criginal Developer shall be released from all obligations under the Developer Loan Documents, 3. The Original Developer hereby represents that: (i) it did not build the Project with the intention of resale i' c om- tin yr �F.n D oject a -A / c r e r. _ .., r � J �..0 ) it is not in default under any provisions of the Developer Loan Documents. 4. The Redevelopment Agency hereby consents to the conveyance described herein (the "Conveyance"), subject to delivery to the Redevelopment Agency of the following, all in form and substance satisfactory to the Redevelopment Agency, the Association, and the Trustee: (i) this Agreement, executed by all the parties hereto; and (ii) an opinion of bond counsel dated the date hereof, addressed to the Redevelopment Agency, the Association and the Trustee to the effect that the Conveyance to the Assuming Developers will not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of the Bonds. 5. The Association hereby acknowledges that, upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in paragraphs 4 and 6 hereof, the conditions imposed by the Association in the Developer Loan Documents regarding transfers of interests in the Project have been satisfied or determined to be inapplicable to the Conveyance. The Association makes no representation regarding the title to or value of the Project. 6. The Association and the Trustee hereby consent to the Conveyances, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions precedent: (i) satisfaction of the conditions to consent described in paragraph 4 above; (ii) delivery to the Association of an original UCC -72 Financing Statement Change, executed by the Assuming Developers, with respect to the personal property encumbered by the Security Agreement; -3- AGENDA ITEM NO. •� PAGE 0E--(A-- (iii) delivery to the Association and the Trustee of an opinion of counsel for the Assuming Developers stating that the Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Assuming Developers and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Assuminq Developers, enforceable in accordance with its terms, and with respect to other matters as shall be reasonably requested by Association; (iv) delivery to the Association of the most current financial statements of the Assuming Developers; (v} payment to the Association of attorneys' fees incurred by the Asscci-atin—n and t he Rod eve 11.opiment Agency Irl connection with the Conveyance; (vi) payment to the Association of an assumption fee of $50,000; and (vii) payment to the Trustee of any unpaid fees. 7. Assuming Developers covenant and agree to pay in full, as and when due, all of the costs and expenses of operating the Project (including, but not limited to, the payments due under the Letter of Credit Note and all other related financing costs). 8. This Agreement shall be subject to and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 9. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and as executed shall constitute the Agreement, binding on all the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all the parties are not signatory to the original same counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. ORIGINAL DEVELOPER: ELSINORE LAKESIDE INVESTORS -84, a California limited partnership UZ By: [Signatures continued on next page.] == I/ Its General Partner Its General Partner AGENDA ITEM NO. -3-C-' PAGE__S 3-- PAGE GF' ASSUMING DEVELOPERS: THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: THE ASSOCIATION: THE TRUSTEE: M -C Fred E. Van Horne Virginia H. Van Horne REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By Title: MERCURY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION NZ Title: SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee W Title. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF�� REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281: Century American (R.C. Hobbs Co.); a _request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract "Map for 144 condominium units on 8.38 acres, located at the southeast corner of Casino Drive and Franklin Street. a PREPARED BY: PPROVED BY ,U �,y ED B : /,�/'� Mark Rho des Dave G"r�derman Rcn Molen Consulting Planner Comm./bD v. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND This project received Design Review approval as an apartment complex on March 14, 1989. The Planning Commission gave Design Review approval for the current project of 144 condominiums on December 20, 1989. Approval for the C.U.P. to allow condominiums was also given at this time. Relatively few changes exist between the proposed project and the original approval. The project as presented meets all applicable standards of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. DISCUSSION The most noticeable change in the current proposal is the addition of detached enclosed garages, also the addition of laundry facilities to each unit. Approval for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map would lapse two (2) years after Council approval. The tract map is necessary for condominiums in order to divide the air space of the lot. Building footprints are not required on the tentative map. Planning Commission has conditioned approval of the proposed carports on future design review. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for this project have been approved by the City Attorney. Staff has concerns regarding the landscaping of the freeway right-of-way area adjacent to this project. Staff recommends that the following condition be added as planning condition number 17, and re -numbering the remainder of the conditions. Condition Number 17: As a part of the landscaping plan for the project developer shall, prior to issuance of occupancy permit, submit for approval by the Community Development Director or his designee, a final landscape plan for the freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project boundary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 88-41 and approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281, based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of condition number 17 It is recommended that the Redevolpment Agency concur with City Council action. AGENDA ITEM NO. �- PAGE OF -- a Page 2 January 9, 1990 Subject: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25281; Century American (R.C. Hobbs Co.) Findings 1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the High Dens_ty Residential Zoning District. 3. This project, as conditioned, complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. 5. The subdivision, as conditioned, will not have significant impact on the envirormnet. 6. The subdivision is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the City's General Plan and is also consistent with "he purpose and standards of the R-3 Multi -Family Residential District. 7. The project, as conditioned, complies with the objectives and Standards of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 9. As conditioned, there will be no conflicts with identified public easements. AGENDA ITEM No. 3, 0 . PAGE 2' OF_, _ REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 25347: Centex Homes; a request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4 lots for financing and conveyance purposes, located on the south side of Mountain Avenue and west of Michigan Street. PREPARED BY. PPROVED BY, D D B *M&n ek Gar Thornhill ave Berman Ron Planning Manager Comm. ev. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND At the meeting of December 20, 1989, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, recommended approval of the Tentative Parcel Map 25347. There was no discussion of this item by the Planning Commission and no public testimony received. DISCUSSION The purpose of this snap is to provide for the parcelization of the subject property to enable the owner to sell off portions for financing and reconveyance. This property is part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District. A Tentative Tract Map has been filed on parcel one by Centex Homes for approximately 600 residential lots. The Tentative Tract Map for the residential subdivision is currently being reviewed by Staff. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm E.I.R. 88-2 and approve Tentative Parcel Map 25347, based on the following findings. FINDINGS 1. The proposed project will not have significant impact on the environment. 2. The purpose of the tentative parcel map is for financial and conveyance reasons and no development is directly attributable to this project. 3. The proposed project complies with all local zoning and subdivision standards. AGENDA ITEM NO. C PAGE OF—L' REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7: Rancon Realty Fund IV; a recrueSt to Silhd i vi dP 22_67 arrAc i nt n 11 parcels and to change the zone from the C -P (Commercial Park) District and M-2 (General Manufacturing) District to the C-2 (General Commercial District), located at the northwest corner of Central and Collier Avenues. PREPARED BY: �� PROVED B i Dave underman Ron Molen yk Comm. Dev. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND At the meeting of December 26, 1989, the City Council continued action on Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7, requested by Rancon Realty Fund IV. The Council asked staff and the applicant to consider conditions requiring freeway landscaping in the Cal Trans right-of-way adjacent to the site and inclusion of bike trails on Central and Collier. Staff has met with the applicant to discuss these issues. - DISCUSSION Although the subject property abuts the I-15 freeway, landscaping of freeway rights-of-way require a uniform, City wide program which includes equitable funding mechanisms and close coordination between Cal Trans and the City. The staff is presently reviewing landscape alternatives and funding mechanisms for a comprehensive freeway landscaping program, however, no program exists presently. Consequently, staff feels it is appropriate to require Rancon participate in any future assessment district or other funding mechanism when a Citywide program is established, but not landscape the freeway presently. Regarding the bike trail issue, again, both Collier and Central are Cal Trans rights-of-way and require Cal Trans approval of street improvement plans. However, the applicant has agreed to design a Class III (on street) bike trail on Collier within the proposed street section, subject to Cal Trans approval. On Central, the need for traffic control measures within the proposed right-of-way may preclude an on street bike trail. Also, due to grade and topography concerns, as well as Cal Trans reluctance to encourage pedestrian and bicyclists to travel adjacent to freeway right-of-way, off street bike trails are not practical. Staff recommends that the following conditions be added as conditions number 42 and 43. AGENDA ITEM NO. �' l PAGE I— OF Page 2 January 9, 1990 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 24571; Zone Change 89-7 Rancon Realty Fund IV Condition Number 42: The property owner, or any subsequent property owner or assigns, shall contribute to and be a participant in _ __.. ylands _ mechanisms subsequently approved and adopted by the City and/or Cal Trans. Condition Number 43: The applicant shall design, and cause to be constructed, a Class III bike trail within the proposed street section on Collier. Said bike trail is subject to Cal Trans and City approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24571 and Zone Change 89-7 based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of conditions number 42 and 43. It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map 24571 1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 2. The subdivision meets the development standards set forth by Section 17.48 of the Municipal Code (C-2 Zoning District). 3. The proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan. Zone Change 89-7 1. Negative Declaration No. 89-22 has been prepared for Zone Change 89-7 and Tentative Parcel Map 24571 based on the findings that all project impacts can be mitigated and no environmental impacts are anticipated. 2. This Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan. 3. State Planning 65860, requires General Plan. Law, California Government Code Section that zoning be consistent with the AGENDA ITEM NO—LL— PAGE OF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Ordinance No.J , City of Lake Elsinore: Adoption of an interim nrH i rlanr�A of tha r- i ty of Lal e Elsinore expanding the moratorium areas on certain properties around the Lake Perimeter and East Floodplain Planning Area. PREPARED BY: n -y, APPROVED BY•� FPROVED Gary Thornhill Dave _ nderman Planning Manager COMMY Dev. Dir. BACKGROUND B �� Rd n' 40'11e'ndy 2 City Manager At the meeting of December 12, 1989, the City Council unanimously approved the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. 876 for the expansion of the East Floodplain Planning Area to include the following areas (see Exhibit "A"): 1. Certain properties located between Lakepoint Park and the San Jacinto River and between Lakeshore Drive and the moratorium area as approved under Ordinance No. 868 on November 14, 1989. 2. Certain properties located southerly of Cereal Street and bounded by Corydon Road on the southeast and the City Limits of the southwest, and moratorium area on the west and, 3. The Lake Perimeter Area beginning at the City boundary at Bonnie Lea Drive and the Lake, continuing southwesterly to Grand Avenue, and including all properties located within the lake side boundaries of Grand Avenue, Riverside Drive, and Lakeshore Drive, and terminating at Lakepoint Park. DISCUSSION The adoption of this interim ordinance would extend the moratorium to coincide with the period of time prescribed under Ordinance No. 868. Both interim ordinances would, unless extended, remain in effect until May 14, 1990. This item has been noticed for hearing pursuant to Government Code requirements. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Interim Ordinance No., and the attached Findings until May 14, 1990. Findings 1. The City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter. AGENDA ITEM NO.' PACE _1__ OF _ Page 2 Jaunary 9, 1990 Subject: Ordinance No. . City Of Lake Elsinore: Adoption of an interim ordinance 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conf=ict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat for adverse impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. AGENDA ITEM NO. P.,1GE� 0` REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE • January 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Industrial Project 89-9: Herron and Rumansoff Architects (Archer Roofing); a request for approval of an Industrial Project for offices in conjunction with a tile roofing company on 1.16 acres,_ located on the east side of Riverside Drive approximately 150 feet north of Collier. 1 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY P-- ED B rolend Mark oades Dave��Gunderman Rbn Consulting Planner Comm/.,/Dev. Dir. City Manager BACKGROUND This project received Planning Commission approval on December 20, 1989, after several preliminary reviews conducted by Staff. The Industrial Project and approved Conditional Use Permit for outside storage received Commission approval after some discussion concerning planning conditions numbers 7, 8a and 8b. Condition number 7 was made to state that the applicant shall connect to sewer within 30 days of it reaching 200 feet of the property, also that a soils report and sewage plan be approved by the County Health Department. Condition number 8a concerns landscape bonding and the submittal of final landscape plans. Conditions 8b contains standard language concerning the screening of mechanical and roof top equipment. DISCUSSION The proposal is for a 1,818 square foot storage and office building on 1.16 acres. Sufficient landscaping is proposed to provide adequate screening along all sides of the project. The site is not visible from the freeway. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was required for the proposed outside storage. The project as approved by the Planning Commission meets all the requirements for a CUP. Staff recommends adding condition number 9, and re -numbering the remainder of the conditions, for a slumpstone block wall along the front of the parcel (excluding building and gate areas) with material to match the proposed structure. Condition Number 9: Prior to issuance of Building permits applicant shall submit a site plan reflecting the addition of a seven (7) foot high wall along the Riverside Drive elevation. Said wall shall be placed wherever proposed fencing is located along the Riverside Drive elevation. Said wall shall be constructed of decorative masonary block to match approved building materials. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration 89-39, and approve Industrial Project 89-9 based on the Findings listed and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the inclusion of condition number 9. AGENDA ITEM ;4G PAGE -i,� OF Page 2 January 9, 1990 Sub'ect: Industrial Project 89-9: Herron and Rumansoff Architects (Archer Roofing) It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council action. Findings 1. The proposed requesz wiil not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The site for the proposed request is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use. 3. The proposed buildings continue the same design as the existing units and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and -he Planning District in which the site is located. AGENDA I1'Ei-v1 PAGE OF REPORT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: January 9, 1989 TO: Redevelopment Agency Chairman and Board of Directors FROM: John R. Harper, Agency Counsel SUBJECT: Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Arvida Company Pursuant to direction of the Agency Chairman and Board of Directors, Agency Counsel Harper, Executive Director Molendyk and Assistant Executive Director Rogers have met and negotiated wth representatives of the Arvida Company to finalize the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement conceptually approved by the Board. I believe that the concerns expressed by all parties have been addressed in the final draft agreement. As presently drafted, the agreement provides protections both for the Agency and Arvida Corporation, taking into account the existence of the Lake Elsinore Associates litigation. Recommendation: Adopt the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Arvida Company and direct that the agreement be executed by the Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors. **NOTE: Agreement was not yet received at time of printing. It will be provided as soon as available. APE Ai6A (TTM PAM OF__..L._�.