HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Agenda Packet 03-13-19901.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
La k e' Elsinore
City Council
Agenda
545 CHANEY STREET - LAKE ELSINORE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM
TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 - 7:00 P.M.
POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL: "Only those items filed with the City Clerk's Office by
Noon, luesday, prior to the following Tuesday meeting, not requiring departmental
investigation will be considered by the City Council at said meeting".
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Note: Any person wishing to address City Council
on any matter not on the Agenda, must complete a
request form available at the speakers podium and
submit it to the City Clerk prior to commencement
of the meeting. (Comments limited to 3 minutes).
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
A. Proclamation - R.O.T.C.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
a. February 27, 1990 - Regular City Council
Meeting.
b. February 21, 1990 - Planning Commission Meeting.
Building Activity Report -- February, 1990.
Code Enforcement Activity Report - February, 1990.
Structure Abatement Activity Report - February, 1990.
Investment Report - February, 1990.
Warrant List - February 28, 1990.
Application to submit Late Claim received on behalf
of Ann Valles/Robert Dillon (CL # 90-5).
Resolution No. 90-10 Establishing a Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE) Program.
Approval of New Riverside County Solid Waste
Management Advisory Council.
Notice of Completion - Lake Community Center Project.
Notice of Completion - Machado Street Widening II
Project (32172 Machado).
Approve.
Rec. & File.
Rec. & File.
Rec. & File.
Rec. & File.
Rec. & File.
Ratify.
Rej. & Ref.
Adopt Res.
No. 90-10.
Approve
Accept.
Notice.
Accept
Notice.
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1990
12. Notice of Completion - Machado Street Landscaping
Project.
13. Acceptance of Hold Harmless Agreement - 16900
Wells Avenue.
14. Acceptance of Grant Deeds for the Purpose of
Street Right -of -Way Dedications - 780 & 790
Acacia.
15.
16.
17.
Final Approval of Tract Maps 24138, 24139 and
24215 - North of Grand Avenue, West of Corydon
between Ontario Way and Skylark Drive.
Acceptance of Quitclaim Deeds for Water Rights -
780 & 790 Acacia and Industrial Project 89-9.
Set Public Hearing date of March 27, 1990 for
the following:
a. Zone Code Amendment 89-3 - City of Lake
Elsinore at the Rist of Deleo Clav Tile.
A request to amend the Parking Ordinance,
Chapter 17.66.030.0 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, to allow flexibility and/or
reduce parking requirements for single
manufacturing enterprises. This amendment
will affect parking requirements for all
future industrial/manufacturing development
applications.
b. Zone Chancre 90-1 - Macleod Development
Company.
A request to change the zoning from C-1 (PUD)
and R-3 (PUD) (Neighborhood Commercial -Planned
Unit Development Overlay and High Density
Resi- dential District -Planned Unit
Development) to R-1 (Single -Family Residential
District - Hillside Planned Development
Overlay for a 46 gross. acre site. The proposal
is to bring the zoning into conformance with
the General Plan designation, which is
required under State Law, Government Code
Section 65860. The proposed Zone Change is
related to, and on the same site as approved
Tract 19358 and Residential Project 89-11.
The above site is located south of Grand
Avenue, 865 feet east of Ortega_Highway and
1,065 feet west of Blanche Drive.
c. Tentative Tract Map 24490 - Jones & Tomich.
A -request to subdivide 7.6 net acres into 35
R-1 (Single Family Residential District) lots.
The project is Icoated approximately 1,500
feet west of Shirley Drive, south of
Washington Avenue, east of Michigan Street.
d. General Plan Amendment 89-9; Zone Chancre
89-10; Variance 90-1; Tentative Parcel Man
25106 and Commercial Project 89-6 - Tomislav
Gabric & Associates.
The proposed project consists of approximately
seven (7) acres of land lying on the south
side of Parkway Avenue, north side of
Lakeshore Drive, west side of 6th Avenue and
east side of 7th Avenue.
Accept
Notice.
Accept
Agreement.
Accept
Deeds.
Approve
Staff
Recomm.
Accept
Deeds.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
31.
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1990
e. General Plan Amendment 89-10 and Zone Change
89-14 - TMP Investments.
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use
Map to include the site designation of Low
Density Residential (0-6.9 d.u./acre); to
consider the pre -zoning of the site to Low
Density Residential. The project consists of
36.79 acres of land, lying south of Scenic
Crest Drive, west of Greenwald Avenue, north
of -the current City boundary.
f. General Plan Amendment 89-15 and Zone Change
89-17 - Brookstone Development, Inc.
A proposal for a General Plan Amendment to
designate 15.29 acres on the northeast corner
of Silver and Flint Streets as limited
Industrial Land Use, from Environmental
Sensitive; to consider a Zone Change request
from R-1 to M-1.
g. General Plan Amendment 90-1 and Zone Change
90-2 - Hunsaker & Associates.
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use
Map from Neighborhood Commercial to High .
Density Residential; to consider a Zone Change
request from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial and
C -P (Commercial Park) to R-3 (High Density
Residential), on a 6.042 acre parcel.
h. General Plan Amendment 90-2 - Jones/Tomich.
A request to amend the General Plan
designation from Floodplain/Floodway to Low
Density Residential, for a 7.6 net acre
site, located approximately 1,500 feet west
of Shirley Drive, south of Washington Avenue,
east of Michga Street. The proposal is
related to Tentative Tract Map 24490, a
proposal to create 35 R-1 (Low Density
Residential) lots.
Recovery of Costs - Demolition of Structure at
29310 Pinnell Street.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Tentative Tract Map 24624 - Centex Homes.
A request for approval of a Tentative Map to
Subdivide 203.4 acres into 589 single family
lots, one open space lot of 2.3+ acres, and one
4.0+ acre lot for park purposes, located south
of the extension of Mountain Avenue and west of
the terminus of Broadway Avenue. Continued from
February 27, 1990.
32. ] Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners.
A request of California Communities for
approval of a Tentative Map to subdivide 72.48
acres into 259 single-familty lots, located
northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus
of Lincoln Street. Continued from February 27,
1990.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Approve
Hearing
Date.
Re -affirm
EIR 88-2;
Approve TTM
24624 based
on Findings.
& Subj. to
Conditions.
Re -affirm
EIR 88-2;
Approve TTM
23988 based
on Findings
& Subj. to
Conditions.
33.
34.
51.
52.
53.
54.
PAGE FOUR - CITY'COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1990
Tentative Tract MMM 25442 - Doug Reuvers &
Continue
Sharon Gibson.
to March 27,
1990.
A request to subdivide 3.20 gross acres into
four (4) lots, which range in size from .58 acre
to .99 acres, for a site located west of Roberts n
Street and north of Shrier Drive. The site is
zoned R -I (Single -Family Residential District).
Continued from February 27, 1990.
Community Facilities District 88-3 - West End
Approve
Assessment District.
Staff
Recomm.
Continued from February 13, 1990.
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
Commercial Project 89-9 - Pinnacle/Lakeshore �3.
Adopt Neg.
Dec. 89-55;
A request to construct a commercial center
Approve CP
consisting of three (3) buildings totaling 28,770
89-9 based
square feet, located approximately 1,200 feet eas
on Findings
of Main Street, north of Lakeshore Drive.
& Subj. to
Conditions.
Industrial Proiect 90-1 - Ed Carlson. Adopt Neg.
Dec. 90-1;
A request to construct an 8,000 square foot Approve IP
industrial building on a .41 acre site, located 90-1 based
approximately 420 feet north of Flint Street, on Findings
west of Langstaff. & Subj. to
Conditions.
BUSINESS ITEMS
Northwest Sewer Project- Assessment District Adopt Res.
86-1. Resolution Nos. 90-11 - 90-17. Nos. 90-11
thru 90-17.
Second Reading = Ordinance No. 883. Adopt Ord.
No. 883.
Relating to Discharge of. Firearms.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
IOF
WHEREAS, Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training
Corps (ROTC) is an academically oriented program compatible
with other secondary school courses and has been established
as an integral academic and administrative part of the Lake
Elsinore Union High School since July 1, 1987; and
WHEREAS, ROTC exposes students to self-discipline,
self-reliance and an awareness of our responsibility and
contributions in today's affairs, both as individuals and as a
citizen of their community; and
WHEREAS, the ROTC cadets gave of their time and
energy to contribute to the open house for the rededication of
City Hall; and
WHEREAS, their conduct and efforts were a tribute to
their leadership, training and self-discipline.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE this 13th day of March, 1990,
that Council wishes to recognize the Cadets and their Leader,
Sergeant Davis for their assistance during the rededication of
the City Hall in the City of Lake Elsinore and wish to commend
the Cadets for their superior conduct during their course of
leading tours through City Hall.
JIM WINKLER, MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
AGENDA ITEM NO. .,
PAGE_I OF—,L_
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Winkler at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Starkey.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director
Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services
Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City
Clerk Kasad.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan, commented on Item #10 of this agenda.
He suggested that the City Council give the Engineering
Department the flexibility to allow a wall at an appropriate
level in relation to the slope easements.
2. Dan Grindell, representing the Lake Elsinore N.A.A.C.P.,
presented Mayor Winkler with a plaque commending him for his
work toward recognition of Martin Luther King's Birthday as a
City holiday.
Mayor Winkler thanked the N.A.A.C.P. for their recognition and
recognized the entire Council for their support of this
effort.
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further discussion and consideration:
Item Nos. 8 and 9.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. February 13, 1990 - Regular City Council Meeting.
The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
b. February 7, 1990 - Planning Commission Meeting.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
�
'i; "'N PAGE OF! J_ _
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
2. Received and ordered filed the Animal Control Activity Report
for January, 1990.
3. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for January
31, 1990.
4. Ratified Warrant List for February 15, 1990.
5. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim
submitted by Charles & Cecilia Mulik (CL #90-4).
6. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim
submitted by Colonial Penn Insurance on behalf of Walter
Quigley (CL #90-3).
7. Approved Proclamation for California Earthquake Preparedness
Month April, 1990.
10. Accepted Grant Deeds for the Purpose of Ten (10) Foot Slope
Easements at 29523 La Shell Street & 16840 Bell Street.
11. Accepted Quitclaim Deeds for Water Rights for 113 Mohr Street
& 4180 W. Crestview.
12. Accepted Quitclaim Deeds for Water Rights at 29523 La Shell
Street.
ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
8. 16th Year C.D.B.G. Projects.
Councilman Washburn commented on the proposed contribution to
the volunteer fire fighters of Station 10, and their
contributions to the Community. He suggested that the
proposed restrooms and shade structures at Machado Park be
deleted from the project list; and replaced with parking
improvements at Yarborough Park.
Councilman Buck advised that the Senior Home Repair program is
being increased from $15,000 to $25,000 for this year.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECTS WITH THE CHANGE FROM MACHADO
PARK TO YARBOROUGH PARK. PROJECTS INCLUDED ARE AS FOLLOW:
Senior Home Repair Program
(continue service to elderly,
low income)
Golden Spectrum
(provide seed money for Senior
Programs)
Riverside County Coalition for
Alternatives for Domestic
Violence (continue funding
City share)
Riverside County Volunteer Fire
Department #10 (Rescue
Equipment)
Homeless Program (local, St.
Vincent De Paul/Crisis Center)
Yarborough Park Parking
Improvements (as suggested by
Councilman Washburn)
$26,500
15,000
1,839
4,020
5,000
47,561
AGENDA ITEM N0. I' G -
PAGE 0� OF 19
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
9. Adoption of Riverside County Department of Health - Well
Ordinance - Resolution No. 90-9.
Councilman Dominguez requested clarification of the Ordinance
and its impact on the geothermal programs. City Attorney
Harper clarified that the ordinance relates only to drinking
water which would not affect geothermal.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-9.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 682 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE REGULATING THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION,
ABANDONMENT, AND DESTRUCTION OF WELLS.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
31. Tentative Tract Mab 24634 _ Centex Homes.
A request to subdivide 206.33 acres into 603 single-family
residential lots. The project is generally located south of
the extension of Mountain Avenue and west of the terminus of
Broadway Avenue. Continued from February 13, 1990.
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that there is
another meeting with the residents and developer on February
28th and recommended continuance to March 13, 1990.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO MARCH 13, 1990.
32. Tentative Tract Map 23988 _ Ortega Partners.
A request of California Communities for approval of a
Tentative Map to subdivide 72.48 acres into 259 single-family
lots, located northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus
of Lincoln Street.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this project
and its prior considerations and revisions.
The City Clerk reported one written comment dated February 27,
1990 from Mr. Henk Huetinck, 30788 Sarabia, Lake Elsinore
expressing concern with flooding, education, recreational
facilities, public services and emergency services.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. asking
those in favor of Tentative Tract Map 23988 to speak. The
following people spoke:
Jeff Kenyon, representing California Communities, advised that
he is the Senior Project Manager for this development and
thanked staff for their assistance in revising their proposal.
He detailed the proposed density, lot sizes, recreation trail
and other amenities proposed.
John Mandrell, representing the Keith Companies, detailed the
West End Assessment District which will provide additional
improvements in this area.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. The
following people spoke:
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE, OF_i_�
PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Scott Josefson, 15070 Alvarado
Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln Street
Mark Soderberg, 15058 Heather
Rosemary Connelly, 30516 Princo
Lynn Josefson, 15070 Alvarado
Pam Eriser, 15042 Zieglinde
Leroy LePro
with concerns relating to density, lot sizes,and traffic
circulation.
Mayor Winkler closed the public hearing at 7:55 p.m.
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that lot
sizes had been a concern, however the density complies with
the General Plan.
Jeff Kenyon explained with regard to traffic concerns he had
offered to place a stop sign; he also explained that he has
met with some of the homeowners to mitigate concerns. He also
detailed the quality and price range of the homes they are
developing.
Mayor Winkler questioned the cost of the assessment district
to each developer and each property owner. John Mandrell
explained that the developers are paying variable amounts
based on the size of the development and the homeowners will
each absorb approximately $13,000 to $14,000.
Discussion ensued with regard to the 25 lots in the center of
the development which will be 6,000 square foot, as well as
possible alterations of the buffer area and the lots in
question.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:40 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:50 P.M.
After further discussion of lot sizes and densities in the
area, it was suggested that a Council Committee of
Councilmembers Buck and Washburn meet with Mr. Josefson and
Mr. Soderberg to discuss concerns prior to the next Council
Meeting.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:18 P.M. AND CONTINUE THIS ITEM
TO MARCH 13, 1990 TO ALLOW REVIEW BY THE ABOVE MENTIONED
COMMITTEE.
33. Tentative Tract Map 24618 = George Wimpey.
A request to create 35, R-1 (Single -Family Residential) lots
from 10.24 gross acres, located approximately 850 feet south
of Grand Avenue, west of Ortega Highway and east of Grandview
Avenue.
City Planner Thornhill detailed this request.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. asking
those in favor of Tentative Tract Map 24618 to speak. The
following person spoke:
Jim Bolton, Keith Companies, representing the applicant,
offered to answer questions from Council.
AGENDA 1TTOO NO, 1,
PAGE OF_La�
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. The
following people spoke:
Steve Fischer, 15701 Shadow Mountain, expressed concern with
the lack of park facilities in this area of the City.
Jeannie Fischer, 15701 Shadow Mountain, further commented on
the need for a passive park in the neighborhood.
Mayor Winkler closed the public hearing at 9:28 p.m.
Councilman Starkey questioned Community Services Director
Watenpaugh about any potential park facilities -'in the area.
Community Services Director Watenpaugh advised that while
there are areas dedicated as open space, no actual park is
proposed.
City Manager Molendyk clarified that when the surrounding
developments received their original approvals no park
facilities were required by the Council.
Councilman Starkey requested that staff review this area for
possible facility locations.
Councilman Washburn questioned the "crib wall" required by the
Conditions of Approval. City Planner Thornhill advised that
this is a wall through which plants can grow and eventually
give the appearance of a landscaped slope.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-47 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 24618 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
Findings
1. If the attached conditions are met, this subdivision
is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives
of the General Plan.
2. This subdivision meets the minimum subdivision
requirements of Title 17 (Zoning Code).
3. If the attached conditions are met, this project will
meet the development requirements and standards of
the Municipal Code.
Planning Division Conditions
1. Tentative Tract Map 24618 will expire two (2) years
from date of approval unless an extension of time is
granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the State
of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to
all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, Title 16 and 17 unless modified by
the Conditions of Approval.
3. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all
lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
4. All signage for this subdivision shall require City
permits.
AGENDA ITEM NO.1:Q-.,,
\ PAGEOF—La,.,.
PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
5. A noise study must be submitted prior to Minor Desig-
Review approval of the dwellings, plotting and
decorative wall for Ortega Highway, to ensure that
the interior and exterior noise levels specified by
the City's Code are provided for Lots 6-15 through
building construction and a sound attenuation wall.
Standard highway noise levels should be assured for
the sound mitigation plan. The City's Noise
Ordinance must be met during all site preparation
activity.
Street names within the subdivision shall be approved
by the Planning Division.
A geologic report with associated recommendations
will be required for grading permit. All grading
shall conform to the requirements of Section 6.11 of
the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the
Uniform Building Code. A temporary erosion control
landscaping plan shall be approved prior to issuance
of grading permits. Temporary erosion control
landscaping shall be provided within 30 days of rour'
grading. The applicant shall bond 100% for material
and labor for one year.
8. Pay all Capital Improvement fees in effect at time of
issuance of building permits.
9. Prior to final approval of Tract Map 24618 the
improvements specified herein and approved by the
Planning commission and the City Council shall be
installed, or the bonds and agreement for said
improvements, shall be submitted to the City, and all
other stated conditions shall be complied with.
10. Prior to approval of the Final Tract Map all lots
within this subdivision shall conform to the minimum
dimensional standards of the R-1 Zoning District, and
property lines shall be at the top of slopes.
11. Prior to Final Map approval, if required, the
applicant shall obtain off-site slope easements for
grading from adjacent property owners. Such
easements shall be approved by the City Engineer and
City Attorney and recorded.
12. Bond for drip or sprinkler irrigation system for
slope areas, prior to issuance of building permits.
If a crib wall is proposed the applicant shall be
responsible for landscaping/irrigation plan shall be
submitted and approved, prior to issuance of grading
permits, subject to the approval of the City's
Landscape Consultant and the Community Development
Director.
13. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City
Building Department.
14. All of the improvements shall be designed by
developer's civil engineer to the specifications of
the City of Lake Elsinore.
15. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside county
Fire Department.
16. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore
AGENr7A ITEM NO. ,
PAGE 0,19
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The
applicant shall provide connection to public sewer
for each lot within the subdivision. No service
laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and
shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and
profiles for submittal to the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
17. The developer shall submit plans to Southern
California Edison for a layout of the street lighting
system. The cost of street lighting, installation,
as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility
of the developer and/or the association. Said plans
shall be approved by the City and shall be installed
in accordance with the City Standards.
18. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison
Company.
19. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas
Company.
20. Meet all requirements of General Telephone.
21. All trailers used during construction shall be
subject to Planning Division review and approval
prior to installation Project mailboxes require
Planning Division review and approval prior to
installation.
22. The developer shall establish a homeowner's
association to manage and impose fees to maintain all
slopes along Ortega Highway. The retaining wall
located on the northeastern most tract boundary shall
be maintained by the homeowner's association. All
other walls shall be the responsibility of the
individual homeowners. The homeowner's association
shall be established to current State laws and be
subject to the approval of the City Attorney and
Community Development Director who shall review all
CC & R's and rules for their adequacy and
completeness. The City Attorney shall review the CC
& R's, homeowner's association documents and all
documents to convey title to the homeowner's
association.
23. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of
landscape and irrigation plans for model homes (if
such are desired), back-up wall areas, street trees
and slope planting in accord with the City Landscape
Guidelines, prior to issuance of building permits.
One model home shall be landscaped using Xeriscape
landscaping with signage identifying its use.
24. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project
prohibiting on -street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC &
R's shall also include screening any ground base disk
from public right-of-way and adjacent property, the
prohibition of roof -mounted or front yard disk. CC &
R's shall be subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director, or his designee, prior to
recordation of any deeds or final map. CC & R's
shall be recorded prior to issuance of any
Certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed
in the future.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OFE
PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
25. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans,
landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor
Design Review approval prior to issuance of building
permits. All standards of development and procedural
steps in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal
shall apply for this project.
26. Provide a decorative masonry wall along Ortega
Highway at the pad elevation/property lines of those
lots at a height consistent with a noise study
acceptable to the Planning Division. Any wall over 8
feet in height shall require Planning Commission
approval. All other walls are subject to the review
and approval of the Community Development Director or
his designee prior to issuance of building permits.
Provide a combination 4 foot high decorative block
wall with 2 feet wrought iron above along Grandview
Avenue, and on the northeasterly retaining wall at
pad elevation, and on Trabuco Avenue, as appropriate,
to preserve views (rather than using 6 feet of solid
fencing). All other side and rear property line
fencing shall be 6 feet high and meet the
requirements of Section 17.14 and 17.23 of the
Municipal Code.
27. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, subdivider shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Director.
28. Property lines shall be at the top of slopes with
downslope areas to be maintained as indicated in
condition number 22, with the exception of Grandview
Avenue and Trabuco Avenue.
29. All proposed exterior lights shall be shielded above
the horizontal plane.
Enaineerina Department Conditions
30. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with
as a conditions of development as specified in the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map
approval.
31. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030)
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
32. All local streets shall have 60 foot right-of-way
with 40 foot curb -to -curb. Restricted local streets
(cul-de-sacs) shall have 50 foot right-of-way with 36
foot curb -to -curb and a 3 foot utility easement on
each side.
33. No single-family lots shall have ingress or egress to
collector streets or higher volume traffic streets.
34. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including
street design recommendations. Provide final Soils
Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish
grade certification.
35. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
No. 85-26).
AGENDA ITEM NO. _L=
6
PAGE OF
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
36. Submit a "Will -serve" letter to the City Engineering
department, from the applicable water district ,
stating that water and sewer arrangements have been
made for this project. Submit this letter prior to
final map approval.
37. Construct all public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must
be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code 16.34).
38. Street improvement plans and specification shall be
prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards latest edition, and City Codes
(Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
39. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of off-site public works improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78). All fees and requirements for
encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before
Certificate of Occupancy.
40. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x
11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering
Department before final inspection of off-site
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
41. Applicant shall obtain any necessary off-site
easements for off-site grading from the adjacent
property owners prior to final map approval.
42. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
43. Provide street lighting, show lighting improvements
on street improvement plans, as required by the City_
Engineer.
44. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public
facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a
letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
45. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall be submitted,
reviewed and approved by City Engineer and Riverside
County Flood Control District prior to final map
approval.
46. All major drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside county Flood Control
District standards and agreement entered into with
the District for construction, ownership and
maintenance.
47. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Flood
Control District Standards.
48. All storm facilities shall provide tract and
downstream property owners with 100 year storm flood
protection and developer shall mitigate any flooding
AGENDA ITEM WO.t_ _ _ G
:PAGE,,,.. �„_ OF I r
PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
and/or erosion downstream caused by development of
site an diversion of drainage.
49. Applicant shall obtain any necessary Cal -Trans
permits and meet all Cal -Trans requirements for
right-of-way dedications and construction on Ortega
Highway.
50. Contribute $102.00 towards the City's Master Entryway
Sign Program.
51. Prior to the Final Map recordation, a_ subdivision
agreement shall be entered into with the
developer(s), owner(s), and the City.
52. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works
improvements as established for the project by the
City Engineer prior to final map approval.
53. Developer shall contribute $6,000.00 towards the
design and construction of traffic signal at Grand
Avenue and Macy Street. This development will
increase traffic at the intersection at least 4% and
should contribute 4% towards construction.
54. Provide sufficient dedication along western tract
boundary for Grandview right-of-way of 66 feet.
55. Grandview along tract boundary shall be improved to
provide a parking lane and 2 travel lanes (32 feet).
Off-site from Half Moon Drive to Laguna Avenue,
Grandview shall be improved to provide a parking lane
and 2 travel lanes (32 feet).
56. Applicant shall agree to join an assessment district
for the cost sharing for construction of the Ortega
Channel and major drainage laterals.
57. Approval of drainage plans for this subdivision is
conditioned upon completion of the master plan
drainage facility required as a condition of approval_.
of Tentative Tract 20139, together with extension as
necessary and required by the City Engineer to serve
this proposed subdivision. If tract 24618 is
constructed prior to completion of the Ortega Channel
then, this developer shall construct the permanent
storm drain improvement under Grand Avenue and enter
into an agreement with developer of Tract 20139 for
appropriate reimbursement.
58. Developer shall extend the Ortega Channel lateral in
Grandview to the southerly tract boundary and will be
entitled to reimbursement through the assessment
district.
59. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by
developer per City Standards, tapes to be provided
prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
34. Tentative Parcel Map 25442 _ Doug Reuvers & Sharon Gibson.
A request to subdivide 3.20 gross acres into four (4) lots,
which range in size from .58 acres to .99 acres, for a site
located west of Robertson Street and north of Shrier Drive.
The site is zoned R-1 (Single -Family Residential District).
AGENDA ITEM/NO. I `�'
rI
pAF j IC
h (1F f_ L
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that concerns
have come to light with regard to access of surrounding
properties, and recommended that it be continued for two
weeks.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO MARCH 13, 1990.
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
51. Commercial Project 89-8 - Krouse Builders.
A request for a 7,250 square foot commercial building on .344
gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Schrivner
Street and Graham Avenue.
City Planner Thornhill detailed this request and exhibited the
new elevations which have been reviewed and approved by the
Downtown Design Review Committee.
Councilman Washburn questioned the ingress and egress for this
project. Staff clarified that it would be from Schrivner
Street.
Councilman Washburn also questioned the exterior design and
recommended heavy landscaping and window awnings for
improvement.
Councilman Buck advised that this had also been recommended
by the Downtown Committee, however it was not shown on the
latest elevations.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
.89-53 AND APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-8 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Findings
1. Subject to the attached conditions, the proposed project
is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse
environmental impact.
2. The project, as approved, complies with the Goals and
Objectives of the General Plan and the Neighborhood
Commercial Zoning District.
3. This project complies with the design directives contained
in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with
conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of
the subject project to insure development of the property
in accordance with Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and
the Planning District in which it is located.
Planning Division
1. Design review approval will lapse and be void unless
building permits are issued within one (1) year. An
extension of time, up to one (1) year per extension, may
be granted by Planning Commission prior to the expiration
of the initial Design Review approval upon application by
the developer one (1) month prior to expiration.
AGENDA ITEMi fNO.
PAGE I OF --L; e
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
2. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented
within the project design in all phases and/or adhered to
strictly.
3. These Conditions of Approval shall be attached or
reproduced upon Page One of building plans prior to their
acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety.
4. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of
utilities.
5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated
on the approved plot plan and elevations. Revisions to
approved site plans or building elevations shall be
subject to Design Review. All plans submitted for
Building Division Plan Check shall conform with the
submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or
the Planning Commission through subsequent action.
6. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall
be used unless modified by the Community Development
Director or his designee.
7. A revised site plan and elevation plan shall be submitted
to the Planning and Building Departments -by the applicant
prior to Building Division issuance of permits which
reflects all conditions of approval by the Community
Development Director or his designee.
8. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's
Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and
erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the
provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using
accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures
shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading,
as approved by the City Engineer.
9. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and
Ordinances.
10. Meet all State handicap requirements.
11. Meet all Riverside County Health Department requirements.
12. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
13. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards
as approved by the Community Development Director.
14. No roof ladders shall be permitted.
15.. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire
rating.
16. Applicant is to meet all County Fire Department
requirements including emergency vehicle turning radius,
and fire resistance requirements for all buildings
including sprinklers where required. A fire detector
check assembly shall be required for any interior fire
lines and hydrants. A letter shall be submitted verifying
compliance prior to issuance of building permits.
17. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units
or other mechanical equipment incidental to development
shall be screened so that they are not visible from
AGENDA ITEM NO. I_��
PAGE
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted
central swamp coolers shall also be screened. All roof
mounted central swamp coolers shall also be screened.
All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six -inches
(611) lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well
and shall be painted to match the building. Evidence of
compliance shall be included in building plans.
18. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the
building.
19. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend
with the center's design theme. Mailboxes shall be
submitted for approval prior to issuance of building
permits, subject to the approval of the postal service and
the Community Development Director or his designee.
20. Brick pavers or texture pavement treatments shall be laid
in bank designs and shall be located at the driveway
approaches and crosswalks.
21. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed
and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant
for a $100.00 per plan fee, and the Community Development
Director or his designee.
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic
sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the
City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and
at least 15 -gallon in size, as approved by the
Community Development Director.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (611) high and six-inch (6")
wide concrete curb.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (151) of ingress/egress
points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches
(3611).
e) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on Landscape Plan and
screened as part of the Landscaping Plan.
f) The Landscape Plan shall provide for ground cover,
shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the
City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
g) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion
of installation of landscape requirements approval/
acceptance, and bond 100% for materials and labor for
one (1) year.
h) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
within affected portion of any phase at the time a
Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any
building.
i) Final Landscape Plan must be consistent with approved
site plan.
j) Final Landscape Plans to include planting and
irrigation details.
AGENDA ITEM NO._�,C�
PAGE I :� OFil___
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
22. Applicant shall construct landscaped berms, not to excee
one (1) foot in height, adjacent to the parking stalls
which are on either side of the driveway entrance to the
parking area. This shall be reflected on Final Landscape
and Grading Plans.
23. Applicant shall provide four (4) additional "carissa
grandiflora", three (3) to be placed adjacent to parking
stall 1129" in a row parallel to the street. The remaining
one (1) shall be placed in the landscaped corner between
the drive aisle and parking stall 111". This shall be
reflected on Final Landscape Plans.
24. Applicant shall annex project into a City Landscape and
Lighting District.
25. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (31) in height
shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion
control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning
Division.
26. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets or allow illumination
above the horizontal plane of the fixture. The light
fixture proposed is to match the architecture of the
building and shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of building permits. No wall pack units shall be
permitted.
27. Any security lighting located on-site shall be ornamental
and shall be shown on building plans, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or his
designee.
28. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for
the center which specifies harmonious and consistent
colors, materials and specifications which will enhance
the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage
Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission. All signage including free-standing signs
shall be by City Permit and in conformance with the
approved Master Signage Program. The Master Signage
Program shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign
permits are required prior to the erection of each sign.
29. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all
requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water and sewer
plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district
conditions and standards.
a) Pay water connection fee per Resolution No. 971.5
prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance.
b) Pay sewer connection fee per Resolution 971.5 prior
to Certificate of Occupancy.
c) Submit hydraulic analysis for water line and
facilities sizing.
d) Design and construct water line along entire project
frontage to EVMWD standards.
e) A reduced pressure principle backflow device is
AGENDA ITEM; „;,, c
PAGE N OF_ N
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
required after the service meter or after an
irrigation meter per Resolution No. 951.
f) A sewage grease interceptor and sample box is
required for each building with grease interceptor/
sample box details and plot plan to be approved by
EVMWD.
g) Fire detector check(s) are required for all on-site
fire protection facilities. Spring loaded traffic lid
and concrete vaults are required.
h) Develop a design plan and construct a commercial
super hydrant per EVMWD standards with plan be be
submitted and approved.
i) All waste discharges shall be subject to EVMWD
Ordinance No. 71 and industrial wastes may require
pre-treatment, and/or installation of individual
monitoring stations.
j) Plumbing plans for the industrial or commercial units
shall be reviewed and approved by EVMWD.
k) All facilities must be designed and constructed at
the owner's expense (or other satisfactory financial
arrangements made) and to the District's Standards.
1) Design and construct a commercial fire hydrant to
replace the existing fire hydrant. The existing fire
hydrant run must be abandoned at the main.
m) It is questionable whether commercial fire flows can
be met here or not. Coordinate with EVMWD to conduct
fire flow pressure testing to see if fire flow
requirements can be met.
n) If fire flows cannot be met a main line extension
(1211min.) will be required. A supporting hydraulic
analysis for the area must also be submitted for
review and approval to support the main line
extension.
o) The EVMWD anticipates providing sanitary sewer service
for the above referenced property based upon the
completion of the 1 mgd expansion of the Regional
Waste Water Reclamation Plant. It is estimated that
an additional 1 mgd sewage treatment capacity will be
available by July 1990. EVMWD has also programmed
additional expansion of the treatment plat by
currently preparing an E.I.R. for the next phase of
construction. By this condition of service the
District expresses no warranties as to the
availability of sewer service for the above referenced
property at such time as applications for sewer
service to the property are accepted or approved.
p) The District reserves the right to, at any time,
revise or update the conditions for this project.
All projects have a one (1) year expiration date and
thereafter are subject for reconditioning.
30. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be
subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official.
31. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all
internal one-way drives aisles.
AGENDA ITEMS NO. ' ` r^'
PAGE. OF L1_
PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
32. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
33. Any additional required dedications for public
right-of-way shall be provided for on site plan.
34. Applicant shall create two (2) standard parking stalls out
of stalls labeled "1" and 112" on building site plan. This
shall be reflected on final site plan.
35. Trailers utilized during construction shall be approved by
Planning Division.
36. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or'building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development Department
for inclusion in the case records.
Engineering Conditions
37. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsino—
Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued.
38. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be
obtained from the Engineering Department.
39. Dedicate a 2.5 foot wide strip of additional right-of-way
along the northerly property line to the City for the
alley prior to issuance of building permit.
40. Dedicate a 10' foot wide strip of additional street
right-of-way along the southerly property line along
Graham Avenue to the City prior to issuance of building
permit.
41. Dedicate additional right-of-way for standard corner
cutback for the future curb return at the westerly corner
of the lot.
42. Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the
applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for review and approval prior to
issuance of building permit.
43. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.20).
44. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26).
45. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water district, stating
that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this
project. Submit this letter prior to applying for
building permit.
46. Construct all off-site public works improvements per
approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans
must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.34).
47. Street and alley improvement plans and specifications
shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall
AGENDA ITEM NO. _L4,1
Z)ii-
PAGE OF—J-=-_
PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
48. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site
improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement
plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior
to issuance of building permits.
49. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title
12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78).
50. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" X 11"
mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before
final inspection of off-site improvements will be
scheduled and approved.
51. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities
(power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley
shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his
agent.
52. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on
street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer.
53. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of
drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
54. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed
through site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a
method approved by the City Engineer.
55. Applicant shall contribute thirty-four dollars ($34.00)
towards the City Master Entryway Sign Program.
56. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works
improvements as established for the project by the City ._
Engineer.
52. Ordinance No. 883 - Firearm Discharge.
City Attorney Harper advised that he would suggest Council
review section 9.88.030 of the proposed Ordinance prior to
adoption.
Councilman Buck commented that he feels this will addressed
the recent concerns. Council concurred.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 883:
ORDINANCE NO. 883
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.88.010 RELATING TO THE
DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
''AGENDA ITEM" J-1-CL
1
j - L
PAGE-
OFJ-e -�-
PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
BUSINESS ITEMS
53. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 882.
Relating to Uniform Codes
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 882:
ORDINANCE NO. 882
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIVORNIA,
REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBERS 799, 797, 798, 795, 796, 800, 794,
AND 802; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS THERETO: UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE, 1988 EDITION; UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1988
EDITION; UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS, 1988 EDITION; UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1988 EDITION;
UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1988 EDITION; UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1988
EDITION; NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1987 EDITION; AND THE
UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, 1988 EDITION.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk advised that the new play equipment at City
Park had been installed; Main Street landscaping should be
complete next week; Yarborough Park Restrooms are complete and the
athletic lighting at Lakepoint Park is on schedule for completion
by March 31, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Dominguez advised that the blacktop area at City Park
is in need of slurry sealing. He also advised that the old
railroad right-of-way area is catching and holding stagnant water
and requested that staff alleviate this problem.
Councilman Washburn announced that Railroad Canyon Road closure
will begin with a soft -closure on March 5, 1990 and a full -closure
on March 26, 1990 and a projected reopening on October 1, 1990.
He also advised that he and Councilman Buck would be meeting with
various groups to explain the improvements and the time frames
involved.
Councilman Buck detailed the alternate routes to be utilized
during the road closure.
Mayor Winkler requested a joint study session with the Public
Safety Committee and the Consultant. He also thanked Captain
Reynolds for his assistance in resolving the concerns expressed by
residents at the last Council Meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
None.
AGENDA ITEM NO- l
\ PAGE y.- ��OF
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
ADJOURNMENT
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 10:01 P.M.
ATTEST:
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
JIM WINKLER, MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
AGENDA �TEtvS NO. . c ,
PAGE G� o
iii..
MINUTES OF
LAKE ELSINORE
HELD ON THE 21ST DAY OF
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING
FEBRUARY
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Gilenson
COMMISSION
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioners: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff and Brown
ABSENT: Commissioners:, Wilsey
Also present were Community Development Director Gunderman,
Planning Manager Thornhill, Associate Planner Restivo, Assistant
Planner Fairbanks and Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell.
MINUTE ACTION
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to approve Minutes of February 7,
1990, as submitted, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS section.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Tentative Parcel Map 25157 - Four Corners A Limited
Partnership (Bainbridge Investments) - Continued from January
17, 1990 - Chairman Brown stated that there has been a request
to continue this item to March 21, 1990, and called for a
motion.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to continue Tentative Parcel
Map 25157 to March 21, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0
2. General Plan Amendment 89-9; Zone Change 89-10; Specific Plan
87-1 Revised; Variance 90-1; Tentative Parcel Map 25106;
Commercial Project 89-6; Street Abandonment 89-3 - Tomislav
Gabric & Associates - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a
request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Specific
Plan Area to General Commercial; to rezone the site to C-2
(General Commercial); to consider Tentative Parcel Map 25106
which creates two new parcels, a new street, and indicates the
vacation of three City streets, and; a Variance to reduce the
front yard setback on the new street. This is a 6.6 acre
vacant parcel located between Lakeshore Drive and Parkway,
south of Avenue 6.
Planning Manager Thornhill presented a memorandum illustrating
minor corrections to the Staff Report and Conditions of
Approval.
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. asking
if anyone wished to speak in favor.
Mr. Mark Telford, representing Tomislav Gabric, spoke in
favor.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor.
Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished
to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown
asked if anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no
response, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 7:12
p.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. J : '
PAGE—L///. OF�
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 2
TOMISLAV GABRIC & ASSOCIATES CONTINUED
Commissioner Brinley commented on the parking area having
security lighting, and the hours of operation.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on setbacks with regard to the
variance requested; security lighting to be provided from dust
to dawn, and street lights.
Chairman Brown commented on Building "B" with regard to the
west elevation and landscaping --inconsistency of rendering and
landscaping plan; emphasis placed on mounding along Avenue 6
and Lakeshore; parking spaces with planters and walkways on
the other side these do not work unless elevated, reference
Building "B" and "C".
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council
adoption of Negative Declaration 89-37 and approval of General
Plan Amendment 89-9; Zone Change 89-10; Specific Plan 87-1
Revised; Variance 90-1; Tentative Parcel Map 25106; Commerc
Project 89-6 and Street Abandonment 89-3 based on the Findings
and subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff
Report as corrected by memorandum dated February 21, 1990, and
adopt Resolution No. 90-4, entitled as follows:
RESOLUTION 90-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-9 TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING THE
DESIGNATION OF 6.6 ACRES FROM SPECIFIC PLAN TO
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
Second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Commissioner Brinley asked for further discussion on security
lighting. A brief discussion ensued on this issue.
Commissioner Saathoff amended his motion to include the
addition of condition number 26.b. to Commercial Project 89-6,
which will read as follows:
Condition 26.b: "Security lighting shall be installed
and operable from dust to dawn."
Second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0
3. Specific Plan 89-1, First Amendment and Tentative Tract Maps
25472-25479 - Homestead Land Development - Chairman Brown
stated that there has been a request to continue these items
to March 7, 1990, and called for a motion.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to continue Specific Plan 89-1,
First Amendment and Tentative Tract Maps 25472-25479 to March
7, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0
4. Variance 90-2 and Industrial Project 90-2 - Ronald A. Lloyd -
Chairman Brown stated that there has been a request to
continue these items to March 7, 1990, and called for a
motion.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Variance 90-2 and
Industrial Project 90-2 to March 7, 1990, second by
Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0
AGENDA ITEM NO.
`^ _LIZ_
PAGE OF
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 3
BUSINESS ITEMS
5. Commercial Project 89-9 - Pinnacle/Lakeshore #3 A General
Partnership - Associate Planner Restivo presented a request to
construct a commercial center consisting of three buildings
totaling 31,500 square feet, on five gross acres, located
approximately 1,200 feet easterly of Main Street, north of
Lakeshore Drive.
Associate Planner Restivo requested the addition of condition
number 38.e, which will read as follows:
Condition 38.e: "The loading area is to be completely
screened from view and/or shall be
located behind commercial building."
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing
the applicant and if there were any concerns.
Mr. Stan Dotts, representing the applicant, commented on
condition number 25.m, pertaining to hydroseeding the
hillside --would like between now and City Council hearing to
get a consultant's opinion on the hydroseeding.
Mr. Dotts questioned condition number 20, pertaining to
mechanical equipment being ground mounted; stated the mansard
roofs are in the rear and not visible to anyone, and this
seems like an ideal place to have the mechanical equipment.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 25.h.,
pertaining to percentages for bonding of landscape
improvements; condition number 20, pertaining to mechanical
equipment being roof mounted if not visible, and height of
parapet wall, amending condition number 20 to reflect the
standard parapet wall condition.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on the grading and whether or
not there would be any cut into the 1:1 slope; Lakeshore Drive
upgrade --would like to see a mechanism, some way to see that
when development is taking place on a major street, like
Lakeshore, that both sides are developed; if this is private
property or the old railroad right -o£ -way; blue tile roof;
condition number 38.e, pertaining to the loading area being
screened from view, what view?
Chairman Brown commented on flooding along Lakeshore, and the
possibility of the City forming a Jv with its lease; if
nothing else, put asphalt berm on the other side --maybe not
curb, gutter and sidewalk. There are three places of ponding
in that stretch. If we are going to do one side and direct
the water to the other side of the street at least try to get
it towards the lake somehow. If we (the City) can participate
in the improvements at that time --not necessarily take
additional right-of-way, which may be years down the line, at
least finish it out to get an even course all the way through
there and at least an AC berm all the way down to the entrance
of both of those projects.
Chairman Brown commented on condition number 25.m, asked if
the intent is for newly created slopes or existing slopes;
amending this condition to reflect "any slopes created by
grading", and deleting the last sentence.
Planning Manager Thornhill requested that condition number 36
be deleted, as it does not apply to this proposal.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council
adoption of Negative Declaration 89-9 and approval of
Commercial Project 89-9 based on the Findings and subject to
AGENDA ITEM NO..�,_
PAGE .J OF.__,`„_
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 4
COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
the 62 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report
the following amendments:
Condition 20: "All roof mounted equipment shall be
at least six -inches (611) lower than
the parapet wall or top of equipment
well and shall be painted to match
the building. Evidence of compliance
shall be included in buil$ing plans."
Condition 25.h: "All landscape improvements shall be
bonded 120% Faithful Performance
Bond, and released at completion of
installation of landscape require-
ments approval/acceptance, and bond
100% for material and labor for one
year."
Condition 25.m: "All slopes created by any grading
shall have a permanent irrigation
system and erosion control vegetation
installed, approved by the Planning
Division."
Condition 36: "Prior to issuance of building
permits, applicant shall pay all fees
required in Conditions of Approval
for ." DELETED
Condition 38.e: "The loading area is to be completely
screened from public right-of-way
view and/or shall be located behind
commercial building."
Second by Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0
with
6. Industrial Project 90-1 - Ed Carlson (The I.N.O. Associates,
Walt Allen) - Associate Planner Restivo presented a proposal
to construct an 8,000 square foot industrial building, located
approximately 420 feet north of Flint Street, west of
Langstaff.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing
the applicant and if there were any concerns.
Mr. Walt Allen, representing the applicant, questioned
condition number 34.b, pertaining to location of trash
enclosure.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 34.b.,
pertaining to the location of the trash enclosure, and
deleting this condition if relocation creates no problem with
maneuverability.
Commissioner Brinley commented on condition number 34.b,
pertaining to vehicle (semi -truck) access, maneuverability,
potential safety hazard, and relocation of the trash
enclosure; condition number 34.a, pertaining to the front
elevation windows.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 34.a,
pertaining to the windows of the open work shop to provide one
continuous windowed area, and providing something more
specific on this condition; asked for the number of employee,
and the possibility of enhancing the landscaping by providing
an outside shade area for employees.
AGENDA ITEM NO. � L
PAGE OF—,Z'_
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 5
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1
Mr. Carlson responded that there would be five employees.
Chairman Brown commented on condition number 34.b, pertaining
to the location of trash enclosure and truck maneuverability
condition number 34.a, pertaining to window treatment and
suggested continuance of windows through a false window
treatment or something of that nature.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council
adoption of Negative Declaration 90-1 and approval of
Industrial Project 90-1 based on the Findings and subject to
the 49 Condition of Approval listed in the Staff Report with
the following amendments:
Condition 34.a: "The front elevation windows of the
"open work shop area" shall be
lengthened and consolidated to
provide for a larger window expanse
similar to the architecture of the
rest of the building. This can be
done through plant -ons or pane
windows."
Condition 34.b: "The trash enclosure shall be located
as per Exhibit 1. The trash
enclosure shall be so located to
allow truck maneuverability in the
loading area."
Second by Commissioner Saathoff.
Approved 4-0
At this time, 8:12 p.m. the Commission recessed.
At this time, 8:25 p.m. the Commission reconvened.
7. Center Identification Sign for Firestone Plaza - Joyce SehiY-
Assistant Planner Fairbanks presented a request to construct
an internally illuminated center identification sign, 22 feet
tall and 12 feet wide with 116.5 square feet of sign face,
located approximately 500 feet southeast of the intersection
of Railroad Canyon Road and Casino Drive.
Assistant Planner Fairbanks stated that staff recommends that
the center identification sign, if approved, not exceed the
height of the 17 feet ten inches with the sign face limited to
96 square feet of sign copy per side, and moved back 5 feet
from the property line.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing
the applicant and if there were any concerns.
Ms. Sehi stated that they were in agreement with staff recom-
mendation.
A brief discussion was held on perception from the street and
setback.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve the Center
Identification Sign for Firestone Plaza based on the Findings
and subject to the 7 Conditions of Approval listed in the
Staff Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 3-1 (Commissioner Brinley voting no)
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE � OF -1—
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 6
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS
Community Development Director Gunderman commented as follows:
1) Informed the Commission that two major projects are coming
before the Planning Commission and City Council shortly.
One being North Peak by TMC, abutting and north of the
Ramsgate Project,.and the Mac Arthur Glen project which is
on Collier, Nichols and 115, which is the designer outlet
center. We have requested that the Planning Commission
appoint two Planning Commissioners, as well as City
Council appointing two Councilmembers, to serve as a
subcommittee to review those proposals.. The first meeting
has been scheduled as follows: Thursday, March 1, 1990, at
9:00 a.m. for the a Mac Arthur Glen project and 10:30 a.m.
for the TMC project.
Commissioner Gilenson and Chairman Brown were appointed to
serve on this subcommittee, with Commissioner Brinley as
an alternate for Chairman Brown.
2) We will have a new Assistant Planner on board Monday,
February 26, 1990.
3) We will have interviews for the Senior Planner position on
March 2, 1990.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
Commissioner Gilenson
Commented on the condition, flooding, of Lakeshore Drive from Lake
Street and Torn Ranch all the way through the City from the last
rain. Does not know if the grading from the project and/or homes
out there has had any affect on it or what we can do to stop the
flooding.
The community is up in arms about crime and what can be done about
it. City Council has appointed a committee to look into police
services and the like. The committee came up with Neighborhood
Watch, it is a great program. We had a Neighborhood Watch meeting
in our area, and 220 flyers were hand delivered to all the homes,
and out of 220 homes 9 families showed. This is not saying a lot
for the area. The police can only do so much, we need Neighborhood
Watch and we need the neighborhoods to get involved. The Sheriff's
Department can let you know who the coordinators are for local
areas. Suggest that all areas of the City get involved with the
Neighborhood Watch Program.
Congratulated to his son who finished boot camp and got a
promotion, and will be going to Tennessee for aircraft mechanics
training.
Commissioner Brinley
Inquired about the landscaping status at the K -Mart site.
Planning Manager Thornhill responded that a significant amount of
new material was planted within the last few months. We can go
back out and look at the site.
Commissioner Saathoff
Asked that Commissioner Wilsey be contacted and asked to sit in on
the Ramsgate meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 27th at 9:00,
for him.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF_,-
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 7
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS CONTINUED
Discussed at the last meeting the feasibility of blocking off
Shrier and Highway 74. Would like to asked, if the Commission
agrees, to have the Engineering Department at the next meeting or
two meetings hence, come back with a feasibility report.
Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell stated that they have already
contacted the traffic engineer, and he is looking at aerials and
plans of the area.
Commissioner Saathoff stated that he would like the Commission to
receive a copy of this report.
Chairman Brown
Agrees with Commissioner Gilenson on Lakeshore Drive, and sure that
Public Works Department is aware that we have lost probably a
quarter of a mile of paving total between Machado and Four Corners,
and the holes are probably 6-10 inches deep.
There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Planning Com-
mission adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff,
second by Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0
Approved,
Jeff Brown,
Chairman
Respectfully submitted
Linda Grindstaff
Planning Commission
Secretary
AGENDA ITEM /NCO.
PAGE�L OF�
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Building Activity Report.
Month of February 1990
S
PREPARED BY APPROVED BY:
Community Developm t Director City Manager
Dave Gund an Ron Molendyk
DISCUSSION•
Attached is the Building Activity Report which also includes
information for year-to-date and last twelve (12) months for
comparison.
RECOMMENDATION•
Receive and file.
AGENDA ITEM NO. a
PAGE / OF L
C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N 0 R E
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
ACTIVITY REPORT - February 1990
NEW
11 - Single Family Residence ....................... $ 1,257,047
1 - Duplexes - Bldgs - 1 Units -2 ................ 170,000
0 - Multiple Family - Bldgs - 0 Units - 0 .......... 0
0 - Commercial ....................................... 0
0 - Industrial ......................................... 0
3 - Mobile Home Installations ........................ $ 143,000
ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS
42 - Residential ...................................... 67,450
3 - Commercial ...................................... 5,000
2 - Industrial ..................................... 3,"`0
5 - Mobile Home ...................................... 23,..0
14 - Swimming Pool/Signs/Blockwall/Misc. .............. 47,200
6 - GRADING .......................................... 158,125
ANNUAL COMPARISON
CURRENT
YEAR
PRECEDING
YEAR
No. Permits
Valuation
No. Permits
Valuation
4 - Model Homes - Tract 17413-6
Month of: February 87 $
1,873,922
93 $
6,341,699
Calendar Year: 145 $ 3,480,046 167 $11,961,844
Last 12 Months: 1073 $44,721,302 1176 $62,179,370
Plumbing Permits: 26 20
Electrical Permits: 42 29
Mechanical Permits: 14 8
Description Owner Valuation
NEW SINGLE FAMILY
407 and 409 Kellogg
Thomas Brothers Dev.
$
164,000
609, 611 and 701 Pottery
Thomas Brothers Dev.
$
243,000
4 - Model Homes - Tract 17413-6
Homestead
$
508,047
4180 West Crestview
Grove
$
180,000
113 Mohr
Frodsham/Glass
$
162,000
NEW MOBILE HOME INSTALLATIONS
15132 Via Valle
Drewette
$
59,000
15136 Via Valle
Barter
$
59,000
32900 Riverside Drive, sp. #94
Peyton Enterprizes
$
25,000
NEW DUPLEX
745 Quail Drive
Jeffrey Juhasz
$ 170,000
AGENDA ITEM NO. a
PAGE 2 O 2....,
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 1, 1990
SUBJECT: CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY REPORT,
PREPARED BY
DISCUSSION
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1990
D:, f�
Ro Molendyk
City Manager
Attached is the Code Enforcement Activity Report for the
month of December, which also includes information on the
previous month and year-to-date.
Receive and file
AGENDA ITEM NO. �>
PAGE /
_ OF�
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DIVISION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT - FEBRUARY, 1990
I.��i91a1[i i��� • •
AGENCIES/DIVISIONS
CURRENT
PREVIOUS
YEAR -TO
Animal Control
MONTH
MONTH
DATE
COMPLAINTS:
_14_
9_
_23_
Resident Complaints
_13_
7_
_20_
Staff Initiated Complaints
_46_
_181_
227_
Total Complaints Received
59
188
,47
Total Violations Corrected
102
140
242
I.��i91a1[i i��� • •
AGENCIES/DIVISIONS
Animal Control
2
2
4
Building & Safety
_14_
9_
_23_
Business Licensing
_02_
_14_
_16_
Health Department
0
0
0
Public Works
18
19
37
Sheriff's Department
_20_
_14_
_34_
Water Department
0_
0_
COURT CASES:
Court Hearings (Disputed
Citations) 0_
Violations Corrected 0 0 0
NUSIANCE ABATEMENT:
Cases Set for Nuisance
Abatement Hearing 3_ 5_ 8_
Total Abatement Completed 0 0 0
TOTAL CASES CLOSED: 154 198 352
AGENDA {TEM NO. '3
OF
PAGE , ��
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: March 1, 1990
SUBJECT: Structure Abatement Activity
Report - February 1990
PREPARED BY• �2tf-�
Community Develo nt Director
Dave Gun y7m
an
DISCUSSION•
APPROVED BY: �.
y Manager
Ron Molendyk
Attached is the Structure Abatement Activity Report which
contains information on monthly activity and the number
of properties involved in the abatement program and their
status.
RECOMMENDATION•
Receive and file.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF
C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND SAFETY.
ACTIVITY REPORT ON STRUCTURE ABATEMENT - FEBRUARY 1990
New structures in abatement .................
Properties currently being demolished........
Total structures being rehabilitated ........
Structures at Intent Notice .................
Structures at First Notice ..................
Structures at Second Notice .................
(For addresses of properties see attached sheet)
Current
Previous
Month
Month
3
5
2
0
7 7
5 3
6 5
4 5
STATUS OF STRUCTURE ABATEMENT PROGRAM TO -DATE
Total structures that have been demolished by owner......... 48
Total structures that have been rehabilitated ............... 27
Structures demolished by the City ........................... 6
Total structures in the abatement program ................... 108
AGENDA ITEM NO.
17
pAGE �L OF_.3—_
ACTIVITY REPORT ON STRUCTURE ABATEMENT - FEBRUARY 1990
NEW STRUCTURES IN ABATEMENT
Camino Del Norte X Main Street - Abandon structures
1116 Cleveland Court - S.F.R. evicted
32395 Corydon Street - S.F.R. evicted
PROPERTIES BEING DEMOLISHED
16313 Arnold Avenue - S.F.R. with structural damage
29310 Pinnell (A.P. #378-090-029-6) - Substandard Shed
STRUCTURES BEING REHABILITATED
208 North Lowell - S.F.R.
32401 Stoneman - Unfinished structure, R.V. Park
210 Riley - Multi -Family
212 Riley - Multi -Family
422 Granite - S.F.R.
309 North Lowell - S.F.R.
29492 Nichols - S.F.R.
STRUCTURE AT INTENT NOTICE
16420 Bailey Avenue - Substandard Garage
1250 Cole Street - Vacant S.F.R.
120 E Franklin - Substandard Apartment
506 Minthorn - Commercial
1119 Cleveland Court - Repossessed S.F.R. Evicted _-
STRUCTURE AT FIRST NOTICE
18010 Heald Avenue - Hazardous S.F.R.
17384 Bromley - Vacant S.F.R.
214 North Kellogg - Illegal Unit
17501 Collier Avenue - Dilapidated S.F.R.
405 Flint - Substandard S.F.R.
17584 Lawrence Way - Vacant and unsecured
STRUCTURE AT SECOND NOTICE
16550 Arnold Avenue - Hazardous S.F.R.
303 West Pottery - Substandard Multi -Family
18520 Collier Avenue - Abandon S.F.R.
30490 Wilson Way - Poorly Maintained S.F.R.
AGENDA ITErw
PAGE 6._ OF S
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS
FEBRUARY 28, 1990
793,000
GOVERNMENT BACKED SECURITIES - NEGOTIABLE
FEDERAL HOME MORTG. CO. 8.000% 02-09-87 06-01-16 216,540
GOV. NATIONAL MORTG. ASS. 8.000% 05-17-88 11-20-00 102,227
318,767
CITY INVESTMENT TOTAL 3,861,767
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - MARCH, 1990
**Will meet anticipated expenditures
AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE....... 8.838%
$615,000
AGENDA ITEM NO. .5
PAGE OF___I
�C
INTEREST
DATE
MATURITY
RATE
PURCHASED
DATE
AMOUNT
LOCAL AGENCY INVEST
FUND
8.538%
DAILY
24-HOUR
$2,750,000
TIME
CERTIFICATE
OF DEPOSIT
BARNETT FED SAVINGS
BANK
8.250%
04-12-88
04-12-90
100,000
CAPITAL BANK
8.500%
04-05-88
04-05-90
99,000
FIRST NETWORK S &
L
10.625%
04-27-89
06-07-90
99,000
FOUNDERS S & L
10.750%
04-14-89
03-15-90
99,000
NEW AMERICAN S & L
8.000%
04-19-88
04-19-90
99,000
OVERLAND PARK S &
L
8.250%
04-08-88
04-10-90
99,000
PLAZA S & L
8.500%
04-28-88
04-30-90
99,000
THE GUARDIAN FED.
S & L
9.800%
01-03-89
07-03-90
99,000
793,000
GOVERNMENT BACKED SECURITIES - NEGOTIABLE
FEDERAL HOME MORTG. CO. 8.000% 02-09-87 06-01-16 216,540
GOV. NATIONAL MORTG. ASS. 8.000% 05-17-88 11-20-00 102,227
318,767
CITY INVESTMENT TOTAL 3,861,767
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - MARCH, 1990
**Will meet anticipated expenditures
AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE....... 8.838%
$615,000
AGENDA ITEM NO. .5
PAGE OF___I
�C
LAKE ELSINORE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-082
PAGE NO. 1
DATE 02/28/90
1CHER
Y0.
PAYE=
JL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV, NO.
AMOUNT
NO.
AMOUNT
A — Z BUS SALES
$383
358.43
ACE LOCK & KEY
8384
15.96
ACTION SUPPLY INC.
8385
803.85
ALERT BARRICADE, INC
18386
65.11
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO.
18387
173.88
ASSOCIATED DIESEL
18388
48.98
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CO.
18389
16380.00
AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION
18390
2520.00
BALLEW & ASSOCIATES, INC.
18391
11008.86
BIG / OIL CO.
18392
4186.03
CYNTHIA BLOOD—WILSON
18393
610.40
PAM BRINLEY
18394
100.00
JEFF BROWN
18395
100.00
B.S.I. CONSULTANTS, INC.
18396
1000.00
WILLIAM S. BUCK
18397
' 300.00 -
C.J. TRAFFIC INC.
18398
649.38
CALIF. BOARD OF EQUALIZATIO
18370
195.08
a
CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMEN
18399
2914.66 A
CALIF. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMEN
18400
175.24 A
CAPELLO JANITORIAL SUPPLY,IN
18401
597.13 4
CAPITOL LEASING CO.
18402
154.82 4
CAR—TEL AUTO TRUCK ELECTRIC
18403
320.25 A
AGENDA ITEM {`NO. `�-�
PAGE�,L OF
LAKE ELSINORE
90-082
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO.
PAGE NO. 2
DATE 02/28/90
JCHEft
NO,
PAYEE WARRANT C' X
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEI
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV. NO.
AMOUNT NO.
AMOUNT
TERESA CHERVENY
18404
150.00
COM SER CO.
18405
2588.31
CONTINENTAL PACIFIC BATTERY
18406
40.48
DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE
18407
190.04
DIXON WHEEL SERVICE
18408
2076.18
FRED DOMINGUEZ
18409
300.00
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
18410
1024.68
ELSINORE OFFICE PRODUCTS
18411
222.76
ELSINORE OFFICE SERVICES
18380
45.00
ELSINORE VALLEY RENTALS
18412
5.50
ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT
18413
50.00
EXPRESS BLUEPRINTING
18414
71.82
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
18415
114.25
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS. CO18416
150.00
FIRST TRUST BANK
18378
23014.80
FONTANA PAVING, INC.
18417
427.96
FRED'S ELECTRIC
18418
270.00
FURNESS, MIDDLEBROOK & KAISE
18419
3513.54
G.T.E. CALIFORNIA INC.
18420
2484.49
G.T.E.L.
18421
238.70
TONY GILENSON
18422
100.00
GRAYNER-ROGERS ENGINEERING
18423
3364.00
AGENDA ITEM NO. l0
PAGE OF
LAKE ELSINORE
90-082
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO.
PAGE NO. 3
DATE 02/28/90
JCHNo.
Na.
PAYF—
L .AIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV. NO.
AMOUNT
NO,
AMOUNT
THE GREENERY
18424
45.00
DAVID A. GUNDERMAN
18425
271.50
HERRERA INTERIORSCAPES
18372
592.56
BOB HICKS TURF 3 EQUIPMENT
18426
274.04
I. B. M.
18427
2002.00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
18428
1134.42
J. & R. LANDSCAPE MAINT., It
18429
465.00
J AND S SIGN CO.
18430
330.00
JOHN'S SERVICE CENTER
18431
30.00
STEV KARVELOT
18432
760.00
VICKI LYNN KASAD
18433
200.00
KLEEN LINE CORPORATION
18434
357.92
KOBATA ASSOCIATES, INC.
18435
1920.00
KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY
18436
164.16
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FRIENDS
18437
t 5181.66
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
18379
55332.10
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
18377
411.78
LAKE ELSINORE FLORIST & GIFT
18438
632.49
LAKE ELSINORE PIPE & SUPPLY
18439
19.84
LAKE ELSINORE TRAVEL SERVICE
18440
226.00
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
18441
375.00
LOS ANGELES TIMES
18442
2337.70
AGENDA ITEMINNO•
PAGE `-� CIF
LAKE ELSINORE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-082
PAGE NO. 4
DATE 02/28/90
'CHER
V0.
PAYEE WARRANT CF
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN -
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV. NO.
AMOUNT NO.
AMOUNT
MAYHALL PRINT SHOP
18443
250.86 >
MCI
18444
101.20 >
RON MOLENDYK
18445
402.38
MONARCH BROOM & WIRE CORP.
18446
131.75
MORROW PLUMBING
18447
47.00 >'
MOTOROLA, INC.
18448
523.50
MR. TIRE SERVICE
18449
858.37 >
WILLIAM MURRAY
18450
2700.00 +
N. B. S. / LOWRY
18451
2800.00 x
R. J. NOBLE COMPANY
18452
l 5.15 A
COUNTY OF ORANGE
18453
165.00 s
P. E. R. C.
18454
254.00 ;
PACIFIC CLAY PRODUCTS, INC.
18455
23.49 R
PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY, I
18456"
22.63 s
PAGE TRUCK EQUIPMENT
18457
384.30 s
BILL PAYNE
18458
101.69 X
THE PLANNING ASSOCIATES
18459
6220.20 a
THE PRESS ENTERPRISE
18460
1076.78 x
PRICE SECURITY SYSTEMS
18461
1662.50
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
18462
461.68 +
PUBLIC WORKS, INC.
18463
54.47
RIGHTWAY
18464
341.40 x
AGENDA Il' EM NO.
SAGE � OF�
LAKE ELSINORE
90-082
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO.
PAGE NO. 5
DATE 02/28/90
CHER
.0.
PAYEE
L ,IL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANTCHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV. NO. AMOUNT
NO.
AMOUNT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FEDERAL
18465
3356.56 x
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE — OFFICE
18466
2550.31 *
RIVERSIDE CO. SUPERIOR COURT
18210
35500.00 A
RODRIGUEZ DISPOSAL CO.
18467
368.75 +
S. C. C. C. A.
18468
25.00 1
BILL SAATHOFF
18469
100.00 m
SEARS CATALOG
18371
181.44 o
SEERS LUMBER
18470
9.61 A
SELECTFORM,INC.
18471
100.56 ,
SELF JANITORIAL SERVICE
18472
450.00 r
SHAMROCK SALES & SERVICE
18473
251.02 ,
KEVIN SHEAR
18474
173.73 ,
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
18475
413.28 ,
SINCERE SEWING MACHINE d
18476
8.81
THERESE SMITH
18477
1 42.80
SUN TRIBUNE
18478
791.70
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C
18479
15580.08
BILL STARKEY
18480
300.00
STOCKWELL & BINNEY
18481
114.53
STUDIO 7 ARCHITECTURE/PLANNI
18482
270.00
TEMECULA VALLEY PERSONNEL
18368
1290.00
THOMAS TEMPS
18483
1977.38
AGENDA ITEM NO. u
PAGE OFE
LAKE ELSINORE 6
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-082 DATE 02/28/90
HER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHF '
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHO0
INV, NO.
AMOUNT
NO.
AMOUNT
THRIFTY DRUG
18376
22.37
*
TOOL CO.
18484
3.98
*
RUSSELL TOURVILLE CONSTRUCTI
18485
44646.16
*
UNITED STATES POSTMASTER
18369
820.00
*
UNIVERSAL COACH PARTS INC.
18486
259.23
*
CARL WARREN d COMPANY
18487
262.06
*
GARY WASHBURN
18488
300.00
*
RICHARD WATENPAUGH
18489
200.00
*
WESTERN HIGHWAY PROD., INC.
18490
120.80
*
WESTLAKE MEDICAL GROUP
18491
1 .00
*
AL WILSEY
18492
50.00
*
JIM WINKLER
18493
300.00
*
RAY WOOD ASSOCIATES
18494
3675.00
*
RAY WOOD
18209
300.00
*
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
18495
125.20
*
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES
18496
15.94
*
HISPANIC HOTLINE
18497
95.00
*
SERENDIPITY ART GALLERY
18374
248.04
*
FAST FRAME
18375
201.88
*
MARY LUEBBERS 3 PATRICIA QUE
18498
18.97
*
JOE * VIOLET PUNOS
18499
18.97
*
JOE d MARJORIE WILLIAMS
18500
36.82
*
AGENDA ITEM(NO.
PAGE `U OF (,
LAKE ELSINORE
90-082
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO.
PAGE NO. 7
DATE 02/28/90
HER
J.
PAYEE-
DL .L OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV. NO.
AMOUNT
NO.
AMOUNT
S. THERESA HANYAK
18501
15.00 *
ASSOCIATED PUBLIC SAFETY
18502
175.00 *
BORGMAN ASSOCIATES PUBLICATI
18503
98.00 *
RICHARD & HELEN WARREN
18504
18.97 *
ROY & ROSALIE HOLLAND
18505
25.39 *
CITRUS BELT CHAPTER- ICBO
18506
75.00 *
INLAND EMPIRE MANAGERS ASSOC18507
15.00 *
GILLESPIE REPORTING
18508
126.20 *
NIXON d EGLI EQUIPMENT
18373
81.44 *
TOMAF SPORTS INC
18509
850.00 *
HINES CONSTRUCTION
18510
58635.00 *
i
AGENDA ITEM NO. L
PAGE OF—Z--
LAKE ELSINORE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-082
PAGE NO. 8
DATE 02/28/90
HER
PAYEE
WARRANT CHF
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED _ WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV, NO.
AMOUNT NO,
AMOUNT
RITTEN
232694.78
REPAID
118236.49
ACCRUED
.Q0
TOTAL
350931.27
RECAP BY FUND
RE -PAID
RITTEN
GENERAL FUND
100
118028.17
127979.98
STATE GAS TAX FUND
110
.00
78195.00
LIGHTING/LANDSCAPE DISTRI130
13.24
17443.68
C.D.B.G. FUND
150
.00
480.00
PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FU
221
.00
3015.94
L.E.T.S. FUND
450
195.08
5580.18
t
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF �'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9I
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
SAMUEL E. GABRIEL & ASSOCIATES
BY: JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQUIRE
801 Pacific Ave.
Long Beach, CA 90813-4226
(213) 436-9292
Attorney for Plaintiff
APPLICATION FOR LATE CLAIM
ANN VALLES, )
Claimant, )
VS. )
STATE of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of)
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, and CITY)
of LAKE ELSINORE, )
Respondents.
(._c-=" C/o S
Y r+ �
M z!AFD
IAKt ft
iGty
��
APPLICATION FOR
PERMISSION TO FILE LATE
CLAIM PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 911.4 TO
912.2, 946.6, 911.6
TO: State of California, County of Riverside, County of Orange,
City of Lake Elsinore:
I, James Grafton Randall, state as follows:
1. That I am employed with the Law Firm of Samuel E.
Gabriel & Associates, and have been assigned the case of Valles
23 < v. Atkinson. et al., that I am licensed to practice before all
24o the courts of this state and the State of Montana;
a
25 w 2. That we were retained by Ms. Valles, the mother of the
26 o decedent, Robert Dillon, on or about October 3, 1989, to
N
a
27 investigate the possibility of pursuing recovery as a result of
a
28 0 1
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OFA_
1 the death of her son, Robert Dillon, who died as the result of
2 an automobile accident on August 8, 1989;
3 3. That it is the procedure of this office, after the
4 clients and/or potential clients have been interviewed, to
5 complete an "interview sheet", which is then in turn assignF- to
6 a paralegal, whose responsibility it is to open up the file,
7 note the relevant dates, and place into the computer all the
8 relevant dates, including but not limited to statute of
9 limitations, six month notices, etc.;
10 4. That since the decedent died on or about August 9, 1989,
11 the paralegal, Gary Poteet, placed in the computer the date of
12 112-2-9011, to allow all parties to know that six month notice
13 should be filed on or before that day;
14 5. That in fact, and upon checking the computer records, it
15 does appear that in fact a notation of 2-2-90 was placed in the
16 computer, under the category as "six month notice" [See Exhibit
17 1 a true and accurate copy is attached hereto and incorporated
18 herein by reference];
19 6. That the computer is designed to produce a daily action
20 report on a daily basis containing all the relevant dates,
21 including six months notices, statute dates, and any other
22 3 relevant matters placed in the computer;
a
23 a 7. That the computer is designed to inform the office of
N
1
240 these dates, on a daily basis, and/or, with a reminder the day
P
25 H before the required date, so that the proper matters can be
a
v
26o pursued and taken care of;
N
a
27
ix
28 2
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF ��
i
1 8. That attached hereto and incorporated herein are the
2 relevant daily action sheets for February 1 through February 7,
3 1990. Unfortunately, due to what can only be perceived as a
4 computer error, the six month date of 2-2-90 did not get caught
5 by the computer, and was not noted on the daily action sheet for
6 the relevant date;
7 9. As stated before, the daily action sheets are designed
8 to reveal the important dates as placed in the computer, and
9 unfortunately, the daily action sheets for the periods described
10 [attached hereto as Exhibit "2" are true and accurate copies of
11 those daily action sheets], the date of 2-2-90 did not come up
12 on the computer action sheets, and therefore, was not detected',
13 by the computer;
14 10. A claim was filed in this matter and served on or
15 about February 22, 1990, apparently two weeks or less from the
16 date that the statutory time expired;
17 11. That good cause exists to relieve the applicant of the
18 six-month statutory period of time and to allow the filing of
19 this late claim, inasmuch as there was excusable neglect,
20 inadvertence, and/or mistake, as a result of what can only be
21 described as "computer error", and that failure of the computer
22 3 to pick up the relevant date and list it on the daily action
a
23 Q sheet;
24 o 12. That the applicant is informed and believes and thereon
a
25-- alleges that no prejudice can result from the public entity as a
a
26 ° result of the expedient manner in which this application for
N
a
27 late claim was pursued, and furthermore, as a result of the fact
m
28 0 3
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17
PAGE—3 OF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 .
23
24
25 ;
i
26 <
27
a
28 c
that the late claim application was filed within a matter of
only days after the six-month period expired; and finally,
inasmuch as there was excusable neglect, mistake, and/or
inadvertence resulting in the filing of the claim and 'his
application for late claim relief.
I declare under penalty of perjury hat the foregoing is
true and correct. Executed this (��i/ day of
1990, at Long Beach, California.
0
i
AGENDA ITEMi
PAGE u OF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
4 '
SAMUEL E. GABRIEL & ASSOCIATES
BY: JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL C,F�y,ry �90
801 Pacific Avenue <FR0a,_
Long Beach, CA 90813 G'
(213) 436-9292
Attorney for Claimants
To: State of California
County of Riverside
County of Orange
City of Lake Elsinore
NOTICE OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2 ETC.)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT ANN VALLES, mother of the
decedent, ROBERT DILLON, does hereby claim damages against
the County of Los Angeles by reason of the following
circumstances:
1. Date of Incident: August 8, 1989
2. Place of Incident: SR -74 (Ortega Highway) at or near
03 feet/miles E of 74 RIV 0.00, 0.3 feet/miles E of county
line, at or near an unincorporated city, Elsinore judicial
district, County of Riverside, beat 11, otherwise known as
the Ortega Highway, near the lower San Juan Creek Campground
about one mile east of the Orange -Riverside County Line.
3. Facts of Incident:
20 On or about such date, and at or near such place, the
claimant's son, Robert Dillon, birth date 9/17/47, was
21 operating a certain 1985 Chevrolet Caprice automobile,
California License No. 1MON74, when, as a direct and
22 proximate result of the negligence of Michael Atkinson, date
of birth 11/14/55, who, at the time of the incident, was
23 `a operating a 1978 Ford Van, Florida License Plate No. 86464W,
w said van believed to be owned by U -Haul, of Florida, and
24 o furthermore, as a direct and proximate result of the
negligence of County of Orange, State of California, State of
25-- California, County of Riverside, City of Elsinore, and any
all other government entities, and personnel employed by,
26 o directed by, agents of, under the control of, or otherwise
< under the responsibility and supervision of, the government
IS
27'and/or public entities named herein, including, but not
limited to, the negligent design, construction, installation,
28 9 repair, maintenance, supervision, and/or control of that
AOI,NDA ITEM NO.
RAGE OF
1
FIA
3
certain premises located hereinabove, including but not
4 limited to a portion of said premises extending approximately
2 miles in the direction, including, but not limited to the
5 failure of said public and/or governmental entities to
advise, caution, warn, and otherwise provide sufficient
6 knowledge of and notice to motorist on and upon such premises
of the dangerous condition of said premises, inc"iding but
7 not limited to dangerous and defective configurations and
curves in the road, lack of warning signs, lack of protective
8 devices such as mirrors, barriers, or other warning and/or
protective and/or cautionary devices advising motorist of the
9 dangerous and defective curve in the road, including but not
limited to a "blind" curve, thus making it difficult, if not
10 impossible for motorists from opposite directions on and upon
such premises to avoid head-on collisions with each other,
11and/or other accidents; claimant further alleges that the
condition at or near the sight of the accident as described
12 hereinabove, and for a distance of approximately 2 miles in
either direction, was dangerous and/or defective, and as
13 such, directly and/or proximately contributed to the accident
complained on herein, and that said premises, road, highway,
14 and/or street, lacked proper superelevation, otherwise known
as "banking", that said superelevation was not consistent
15 across the roadway, and that the lack of superelevation
prevented a driver entering a curve in the road from
16 ascertaining the existence of the change of the
superelevation, thereby preventing the driver from
17 determining the proper speed to negotiate the curb;
furthermore, claimant contends that the government entity
18 and/or public entities, and their employees, agents, and/or
servants, are further responsible for the death of her son,
19 as a direct and proximate result of the failure of the
governmental/public entities to provide warning signs of the
20 dangerous, hazardous and defective conditions of the
roadways, described herein, and as discovery will further
21 disclose upon further investigation of this incident,
particularly since such dangerous condition would not have
22 3been. reasonably apparent to, nor have been anticipated by, a
g person using the highway with due care.
23 `a
w Plaintiff further alleges that the public/governmental
24aentities named herein, and those which may be disclosed upon
Z further investigation and discovery in this matter, were on
25 --actual and/or constructive notice of the dangerous condition
uin the roadway, furthermore, claimant believes and thereon
260. alleges that such conditions had existed for a period of time
a and was of such an obvious nature that the public entity, in
27'4 the exercise of due care, knew, and/or in the exercise of
reasonable diligence should have known of the condition and
28c its dangerous character in sufficient time prior to the date
AGENDA ITEM NO. :1,�
PAGE r OF
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
of the incident herein alleged to have provided warning,
cautions, and/or other advice to oncoming motorist, and
furthermore, claimant further alleges that the
public/governmental entities herein name, and others which
may be disclosed upon further investigation and discovery,
could have and/or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence
would have discovered the dangerous condition if the
govern...ant/public entities would have performed a reasonable
inspection prior to the date of this incident.
As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of
the public/ governmental entities and their employees, as
designated herein, including but not limited to the acts
and/or omissions of said entities as set forth herein,
including but not limited to the failure to properly mark,
designate, advise, caution, warn, and/or otherwise provide
notice to motorists of the curve in the road, and of the
danger of on -coming motorists, and of the other dangerous
and/or defective conditions as set forth herein, claimant's
son, Robert Dillon, was struck head-on by Michael Atchinson,
on the date set forth hereinabove, directly and proximately'
resulting in the death of Robert Dillon.
Damages:
As a direct and proximate result of the conduct of the
public entities as designated herein, and their employees,
agents and/or servants and as discovery and/or investigation
will further disclose, the claimant seeks damages for the
wrongful death of her son, in accordance with the provisions
of Code of Civil Procedure Section 377, Probate Code Section
573, including but not limited to present value of future
contributions; the value of personal service, advice and
timing that would have probably have been given; the value of
the decedent's society and companionship; medical expenses
incurred up to and prior to the death of the decedent; and,
the pain and suffering endured by the decedent, prior to his
death.
23< 5. Address of the Claimant:
N
T
24 o 801 Pacific Avenue
`a Long Beach, California 90813
25 W
6. Right to Amend Claim:
26 0
a Claimant reserves the right to amend this claim, as this
27 `matter is in its nascent stages, and further discovery,
investigation, and/or other matters may disclose different
28 theories, facts, elements of damages, or other matters w ich
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF
1
2
3
may substantially and/or materially change this particular
4 claim. This claim is submitted at this time to the public
entities, as designated herein, in order to advise the
5 entities of the intent of the claimant to seek civil recovery
of damages against said entities, and, in an attempt to
6 comply with the provisions of Government Code Sections 910.
et seq.
7
Dated: 2-21-90
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2211
23 `a
24 0
a
25 W
a
U
260.
a
27 !`
m
28
AGENDA ITE, r
PAGE. OF
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A
DISADVANTAGE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM
PREPARED BY: APPROVED: �, K",E ✓
Ray O'Donnell Ron Kirchner
Senior Civil Engineer Director of Public
C .��Services
APPROVED: /<JlJ n� p/n/e AAAA
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
The 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance
Act (STURAA) stipulates there will no longer be a need for separate
DBE and WBE goals. For this reason, the City has been instructed
to update its DBE program to include the new requirements and adopt
a resolution dealing with the updated requirements.
SUMMARY
The existing DBE program has been reviewed and updated (Ref.
Exhibit "A"). Also attached is the necessary resolution to
implement the new program (Ref. Exhibit "B").
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
1. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to record said document.
fi.GEPDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF /
W
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE)
PROGRAM
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
I. Policy Statement
It is the policy of the City of Lake Elsinore to utilize
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and firms as defined
in 49CFR Part 23 in all aspects of contracting to the maximum
extent feasible. This policy which is fully described herein
constitutes policy and commitment to substantially increase DBE
Utilization in all program activities funded wholly or in part
by any U.S. Department of Transportation model element.
This agency, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the
recipients of Federal -aid funds, agree to ensure DBE firms have
the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of
contracts and subcontracts. In this regard, this Agency and
all of its contractors and subcontractors will take all
reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that
DBE and firms have the maximum opportunity to compete for and
perform contracts.
Ron Molendyk, City Manager
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
EXHIBIT A PAGE a Orr
�T
II. Disadvantaged Business_ Enterprise (DBE) Liaison Officer
Ron Kirchner, City Engineer for the City of Lake Elsinore is the DBE
Liaison Officer for this agency and shall report to the City Manager.
He will be assigned such staff as is necessary to fully implement the
provision of 49CFR Part 23 and such other DBE programs as may be
required. The reporting structure and duties of support staff
are shown on Attachment A.
III. Duties of the DBE Liaison Officer
The DBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and implement the DBE
Program on a day-to-day basis. The Liaison Officer shall:
o Develop and carry out technical assistance programs for DBE's.
o Arrange solicitations, time for the presentation of bids,
quantities, specifications, and delivery schedules so as, to
facilitate the participation of DBE's. Where such
changes are found necessary to increase DBE utilization,
they will be made in consultation and cooperation with the
functional unit involved.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE
o Provide guidance to DBE's in overcoming barriers, such as
inability to obtain bonding or financing.
o Carry out information and communication programs on contracting
opportunities in a timely manner. Programs shall be
bilingual where appropriate.
o Investigate the services offered by banks owned and controlled by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises.
o Unless noted elsewhere herein the listing of DBE's certified by
Caltrans will be utilized. Said listing is to be made
available to all project bidders. Such listing will include the
following information: Name, address, telephone number, ethnic
and/or sexual ownership, type of work performed by firm.
o Prior to approval of the substitution of any DBE
sub -contractor, the prime contractors will be required to prove
performance of good faith efforts to replace the DBE with another
eligible DBE.
o Establish a DBE overall annual goal. The goal shall be evaluated
annually and adjusted as necessary.
o Establish an appropriate individual project DBE goal for each
Federal Project advertised.
o Perform good faith analysis when the project goal is not achieved.
o Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify performance
of all activities included in this program.
IV. Public Notification
1. At the time of submittal of this program to the State Department
of Transportation,
a notice in
both minority and
majority
local media will be
published.
Said publication
shall include:
o The annual overall DBE goal.
o Notification that a description of how the goal was
set is available for public inspection for a period
of 30 days.
AGEWA ITEM NO.�
PAGE OF /
V.
r--
o Notification that both U.S. DOT and this agency will
accept comments on the goal for 45 days from the
date of the notice. The notice shall advise
interested parties that comments are for information
purposes only.
2. This.program will be reaffirmed by public notice annually
at the time of publication of overall goal. If
substantial changes are made to this document, the
entire document shall be subject to notification noted in (1)
above.
3. In addition to the foregoing, interested disadvantaged
and majority contractor organizations will receive direct
mailings of this complete program.
Establishment of Goal
1. The DBE goal will be established both annually (overall)
and on a per contract basis. The overall goal will be
based on planned contract activity for the coming year.
The overall goal established will be subject to methodology
and procedures established in 49CFR 23, Subparts (C) and
(D) and take effect on October 1st of each year.
2. The overall DBE goal established with this initial
program is 10% and covers the period October 1, 1989 to
September 30, 1990.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF
�,
3. Individual project goals will be established based on the
following criteria:
o Attainment of established overall goals.
o Size of project.
o Opportunities for DBE's as subcontractors, vendors, and
suppliers.
o Minority population of geographic area in which work is to be
performed.
o DBE goals being utilized in the geographic area by
other State, Federal or local jurisdictions.
o Availability of certified DBE's.
o Past experience on projects similar to the project being
evaluated.
o Such other factors as may effect the utilization of DBE's
Complete evaluation documentation will be retained for each project.
4. Projects which do not contain a specific goal will contain the
following provisions:
A. "Policy. It is the policy of the Department of Transpor-
tation that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined
in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts financed
in whole or in part with Federal funds under this
agreement. Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49
CFE Part 23 apply to this agreement." .
PACS & QF_14
B. DBE Obligation. (i) The recipient or its contractor
agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and
subcontracts financed in whole or in part with
Federal funds provided under this agreement. In
this regard, all recipients or contractors shall take all
necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49
CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business
enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for
and perform contracts. Recipients and their _
contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of
race, color, national origin, or sex in the award
and performance of DOT -assisted contracts."
VI. Contract Procedure
This program shall be implemented through the utilization of a
contract special provision which will be provided/updated as
necessary by Caltrans' Division of Local Streets and Roads.
These procedures require bidders to submit the names of DBE
subcontractors and suppliers, a description of the work each is
to perform or material to be furnished, and the dollar value of
each DBE subactivity.
AaCi�OA ITEM NO.
pRCE_�Z— OF—L.�_
VII. DBE Notification
Projects will be advertised in local newspapers and minority
focus newspapers when possible. These ads will include
reference to DBE requirements and will indicate the DBE project
goal.
DBE supportive service assistance centers will receive
notification of projects scheduled to be advertised. Such
Centers, will be afforded the opportunity to receive
complimentary plans and specifications for projects within
their geographical area of responsibility.
VIII. Selection Criteria for Projects with DBE Goal
Every project containing a DBE goal shall be evaluated by the
DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee to ascertain bidding
contractors' efforts to attain the DBE goal. The award of any
project must be concurred with by the DBE Liaison Officer or
his/her designee before said contract may be awarded. Should
there be disagreement between functional units concerning
contractors' efforts to attain contract goals for DBE
participation, the matter shall be referred to the City Manager
or his/her designee, for final determination.
Competitors that fail to meet the DBE goal and fail.to
demonstrate sufficient reasonable good faith efforts shall be
declared non-responsive and ineligible for award of the
contract.
U.cn3JA : y' -M N0. v
PACE __F®OF��
All contracts that contain a DBE goal, pursuant to this policy,
will be monitored on an ongoing basis by project personnel
during the course of construction. The DBE Liaison Officer is
to be immediately advised of any circumstances wherein
contractor compliance with the DBE provision is questionable.
The contractor shall submit a final report for each project.
which includes total payments to the prime contractor as well
as any payments.
The prime contractor has made to DBE subcontractors, vendors
and suppliers. If the report indicates the prime contractor
has not achieved the project goal, project personnel shall
attach an evaluation, in narrative form, of the reasons for
failure to attain the goal and any corrective action that was
taken.
Prime contractors will be required to notify the Agency of any
situation in which regularly scheduled progress payments are
not made to DBE subcontractors, vendors or suppliers.
IX. Set -Asides
If determined necessary by the DBE Liaison Officer, DBE
Set -Asides will be considered as a tool to achieve annual
overall goals.
W D
r -n
X. Counting DBE Participants
This Agency, its contractors, and subcontractors shall count
DBE participation in accordance with the provisions of Section
23.47, Title 49, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
XZ. Records and Reports
1. The DBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records, and
provide such reports, as are necessary to ensure full
compliance with this policy. Such records and reports shall
include, as a minimum, the following information:
o Awards to DBE's.
o Awards to majority contractors.
o Final project reports concerning DBE utilization.
o Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate compliance with
this program.
2. The DBE Liaison officer shall submit reports to Caltrans and/or
to the appropriate U.S. DOT element as required. These
reports will include:
o Number and dollar value of contracts awarded.
o Number and dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded to
DBE's.
0 Description of general categories of contracts awarded to DBE's.
o The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded during
the year which were awarded to DBE's.
o Indication as to the extent of which the percentage met or
exceeded the overall goal.
o Reports shall be broken down separately by ethnic grouping.
XII. Complaints
Any complaints received by the Agency concerning this program
will be investigated by the City of Lake Elsinore. The City
will endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of
receipt by the DBE Liaison Officer. The appropriate DOT
element and Caltrans will be furnished a copy of the complaint
and may be invited to participate in the investigation/
resolution. The DOT element and Caltrans will receive a
complete investigative report on the complaint and maybe
requested to concur in the proposed disposition of said
complaint.
Contractors will be directed to notify the Agency of any
complaints they may receive concerning this program.
ol,kCsM // —�F/
ATTACHMENT "All
Organization Chart Duties
CITY MANAGER Insure that DBE Policy is imple-
mented as adopted by City Council.
Ron Molendyk Take appropriate action to resolve
disagreement.
LIAISON OFFICER See Section III of Policy.
Ron Kirchner
PUBLIC WORKS Assist the Liaison Officer in
INSPECTOR insuring contractor compliance
through receiving reports and
taking interviews the making
field observations and keeping
records in daily diary of contract
activities.
PAGE -L -2 -OF SIL
ATTACHMENT B
The City of Lake Elsinore has set the following annual goals
for participation in projects receiving U.S. Dot Funds by DBE
contractors for the period October 1, 1989 through
September 30, 1990. DBE: 10%.
These goals are based on the following:
1. Number and types of contracts to be awarded.
1 - Construct a bridge over the San Jacinto River.
1 - Resurfacing Lakeshore Drive.
2. Number and types of DBE contractors likely to be
available to compete for contracts.
5 - Paving, concrete, grading.
�-r
Yi .i:Y.:+tVPY eTE.M NO—L.
PAGE
RESOLUTION NO. g0-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ESTABLISHING A
DISADVANTAGE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM AND
APPOINTING A DBE LIAISON OFFICER AND ESTABLISHING DBE GOALS
WHEREAS, 49 CFR Part 23 heretofore requires a Disadvantage
Enterprises (DBE) Program for recipients of Department of
Transportation funds; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Register states that all
sub -recipients of department of Transportation funds must
prepare their own DBE Program and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore intends to be a sub -recipient of
Department transportation funds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Lake Elsinore as follows:
1. The City hereby adopts the DBE Program, which is attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution;
2. The City Engineer, Ron Kirchner, is hereby appointed as the DBE
Liaison Officer whose duties and responsibilities are
defined in the DBE Program;
3. The following DBE goals are established for the period of
October 1, 1989 to September 30, 1990:
Disadvantage Business : 10%
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of March, 1990, by the following
vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
JIM WINKLER, MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT B "AGE / z OF /-�z _
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE NEW SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL
PREPARED BY:/[Itti7
APPROVED BY:
Ra O'Donnell Ron Kirchner
Senior Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED BY: 6 &
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
The County Board of Supervisors adopted and approved Resolution No.
89-636 on December 19, 1989. This resolution broadens the base of
the County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council to include
greater city involvement and participation in County Solid Waste
planning activities. It also serves as the Countywide Task Force
which is required under the new recycling law.
SUMMARY
This action is required to promote greater City/County cooperaton
and coordination in the development of future recycling, source
reduction elements, and siting elements of the new County
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan.
AB 939, passed by the legislature in September 1989, required the
formation of this new "Task Force" by March 1, 1990. The action
proposed retains the use of all the active membership participants
of the existing Solid Waste Management Advisory Council and
expands it to include other interests.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the new Solid Waste Management Advisory Council, as
modified through Resolution No. 89-636.
Aca:NDA ITEM, N0-3._...--
PAGE
0.3._...--
PAGcOF
02/14/90 10:09 RIV CO WASTE MGMT P.01
six
ONE
w
TWO
R9SOLUTION NO. 89-636
or
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL
(Mandate of AB 939)
appointed by Board of Supervisorss
Member of Board -- Pres. of Council - no vote
sone appointment from each Supervisorial District
appointed by each City Council (2) representing ove
100,000 population
appointed by CVAC
TWO appointed by WRAG
ONE appointed by institute of Scrap Recycling Industry
TWO appointed by Board of Directors of Co. Dept.
Development -
THREE refuse haulers appointed by the San Bernardino and
Riverside Counties Disposal Association
*One liquid waste hauler
*Two refuse haulers
TWO agricultural representatives appointed by the Rivers/
County farm Bureau
ONE appointedside
Suh.reCouncil
yors Association
`
PAGE -L -OF
,02(14/90 10:11 RIU CO WASTE MGMT P.OE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8I
9'
10
11
12
13
14
15
A
U ! 17!
J
18
S 1g
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
RESOLUTION NO. 89-636
ESTABLISHING A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
ADVISORY COUNCIL & RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO, 87-501
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Riverside, State of California, in regular session
assembled on December 19, 1989, that there is hereby established
a Solid Waste Management Advisory Council as follows:
1. Functions
a. The Solid Waste Management Advisory Council, herein
called Council, shall study, review, evaluate and make
recommendations to the Board of Supervisors, herein called Board,
relative to the preparation and future revisions of the County-
wide Integrated Waste Management Plan, which shall include
source reduction, and recycling elements, and other elements
required by the State to be prepared under the guidance of a new
County "Task Force" as set forth in AB 939: (Chapter 1095 of the
statutes for 1989) including any environmental impact reports in
connection therewith, coordination with Cities on waste
management issues, and solid waste management in general. The
Council shall file its reports and recommendations with the Board
of Supervisors for its consideration and action. The Board may
refer back to the Council, as directed by the Board, any proposals
and recommendations made by the Council, after action or approval
of the Board.
ft bwft B oe#dd to to s bw Ow 01
heel MW &V &doom by "4 5wd of swop
vtoomm the date tth.n4: vChWeLg.1384
/ 1�1'K'o .CkttrdaNdBosrd :?�aE��:r� iTc.,S •>�.D�C
PAGE
4
02/14/90 10:11 RIV CO WASTE MGMT P.05
1
2
3
5
b
7'I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2411
25
26
27
28
b. The Council may establish committees as necessary to
gather knowledge and expertise in areas pertaining to Solid Waste
Management.
2. Membership.
a. The Council shall consist of a minimum of 22
members as follows: i
(1) Six persons shall be appointed by the Board and
such appointments shall include one member of the �
Board (who shall serve as president of the Council,
but shall have no vote) and one
person from each
Supervisorial District.
{
(2) One person who is appointed by the City Council of
each City whose population is certified by that
Council to exceed 100,000 at the time of
appointment.
i
(3) Two persons who shall be appointed by the Coachella
Valley Association of Governments to represent the
Cities of Eastern Riverside County not otherwise
represented on the Council.
(4) Two persons who shall be appointed by Western
Riverside Association of Governments to represent
the Cities of Western Riverside County not
otherwise represented on the Council.
(5) One member shall be appointed by the Institute of
Scrap Recycling Industries.
02/14/90 10:10 RIV CO WASTE MGMT P.04
1 (6) One member of the environmental community
2 interested in matters of waste management who shall
3 be nominated by the Chairman of the County Board of
4 Supervisors and approved by a majority of the
County Board o_' Supervisors.
5
(7) Two persons, who are industry representatives,
6
shall be appointed by the Board of Directors of the
7
County Department of Development.
S
(8) Three persons, two who are refuse haulers and one
9
who is a liquid waste hauler, shall be appointed by
10
the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties Disposal
11
Association.
12
(9) Two persons, who are agricultural representatives,
13 shall be appointed by the Riverside County Farm
14
Bureau, Inc.
15
(10) One person shall be appointed by the Riverside
16 Chapter of the California Council of Civil
17 Engineers and Land Surveyors Association.
Z8 b. As vacancies occur within the membership
19 appointments allocated hereinabove, appointments shall be made by
20 the concerned appointing authority to fill such vacancies.
21 C. Each appointing authority may appoint an alternate
22 Council Member to serve upon sub -committees or represent their
23 appointing authority during Council meetings in the absence of the
24 primary Council Member.
25 3. Staff Assistance. The County Administrative Officer,
28 the County Health Officer, the County Planning Director and the
27 Director of Waste Management or their designated representatives,
28 /// C
02/14/90 10:10 RIU CO WASTE MGMT P.03
i
1 shall each serve as ex officio members but shall have no vote.
2 They shall provide such technical assistance an may be required or j
I
3 deemed necessary by the Council. The Director of Waste Management
i
4 :
shall act as secretary of the Council and shall keep its t ords j
5 and transmit its recommendations and reports, and shall provide
such staff assistance as may be needed by the Council. The
8
7 Director of Waste Management shall act as administrator of the `
County Solid Waste Management Plan and the County -wide
8 i
9 Integrated Waste Management Plan and shall be authorized to
perform those functions that require, findings of conformance,
10
County determination of need and necessity, implementation of goal
11
and policies, and other duties required to meet State and Federal
22
Rules and Regulations.
13
4. Reimbursement of Expenses, Reimbursement for the voting
14 members' actual and necessary expenses while carrying out the
15 duties of the Council shall be as provided in section 9 of County
16 Ordinance No. 440.
17 S. Vacancies. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist upon the
18 resignation or death of a member, or when a member has failed to
19 attend three consecutive meeting and such absence has not been
24 excused by the Council. A report thereof shall be made by or on
21 behalf of the Council to the concerned appointing authority.
22 6. Removal of a Member. Members of the Council shall serve
23 at the pleasure of the concerned appointing authority, and may be
24 removed at any time by such appointing authority.
25 7. Officers.
26 a, The members of the Council shall elect one of its
27 members to serve as vice president,
25
-4-
02/14/90 10:09 RIV CC WASTE MGMT P.02
I
1 b. The president shall preside at all Council meetings,
2 exercise general supervision of the affairs and activities of the
3 Council, and serve as an ex officio member of all Council
4 committees. The chairman shall appoint from Council membership a
chairperson and committee personnel to serve on each committee
5
established pursuant to this resolution.
6
C. The vice president shall assume the duties and
7
powers of the president in the event of the president's absence.
S
d. In the event of the president's and the vice
9
president's absence, the secretary shall supervise the election a
10
president pro tempore.
11
S. Ouorum. A quorum shall consist of eleven members. Any
12
action of the Council shall require affirmative votes of not less
13
than a quorum, except that less than a quorum may adjourn a
14 meeting sine die or to a specified time and place.
15 g, Meetings. The Council shall hold regular meetings at
16 such times and places within the County of Riverside as may be
17 designated by the president or the Council. The calling, giving
18 notice and conducting of meetings shall be in accordance with the
14 Ralph M. Brown Act (Section 54850 at seg. of the Government Code)
20 and as ordered by the president of the Council or as directed by a
21 majority of a quorum.
22 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that Resolution No.
23 87-501 and any and all prior resolutions and orders adopted by
24 this Board relating to the establishment, organization and
25 functions of a Solid waste Management Advisory Council are hereby
26 rescinded.
27 Roll Call resulted as follows:
Ayess Abraham, Dunlap, Larson, Younglove and Ceniceros
28 Noes: None
Absent: None C 0
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
LAKE COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT
PREPARED BY: GfJ w APPROVED:_ -L
es R. King Ron Kirchner
ssociate Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
i
APPROVED: �-� a
Ron Mol ndyk
City Manager
The project was authorized by the City Council on October 24, 1989
and budgeted in Capital Project Account 4802. The work consisted
of installing ceiling tile and renovating the interior of the front
offices of the Community Center.
SUMMARY
The contractor has completed the work as specified in the contract
on February 12, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total amount of the construction cost was $25,020.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council accept the work as completed and
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and have recorded
said Notice of Completion document.
�M��
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
F
Name
Street
Ad:ress
Cay &
LState
1_
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.)
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is City of Lake Elsinore
3. The full address of the owner is 130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92330
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee.
(If other than fee. strike "In fee" and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract of purchase;' or "lessee")
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed onFe b r u a r y 12 , 19 9 0 The work done was:
To install ceiling tile and renovate the front offices
7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was R u s s e 11 To u r v i l l e Construction
October 24, 1989
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert -none '.) (Date of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Lake Elsinore
County of R i v P r s i d P State of California, and is described as follows: Lake Community
Center Project
9. The street address of said property is
Dated:
Verification for Individual Owner
(It no street address has been officially assigned. insert "none".)
Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner
named in paragraph 2 or his agent
VERIFICATION
1, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Services the declarant of the foregoing
("President of, "Manager of', "A partner of, "Owner of', etc.)
notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on I�NT'2- Ca 19 at-
(Date
t California.
(Date of signature.) ^rnI (City where signed.)
1 L
(Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of
the notice of completion are true.)
F.: EPdE7 � iTEM, ttiO. �o
NOTICE OF COMPLETION-WOLCCTTS FORM 1114 -REV. 6.74 8 pt. type or larger
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
MACHADO STREET WIDENING II PROJECT
(32172 MACHADO)
PREPARED BY:� APPROVED: & ��
Jd es R. King Ron.Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED • (;'—
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND -
The project was authorized by the City Council on September 12,
1989 and budgeted in Capital Project Account 4821. The work
consisted of constructing curb and gutter, sidewalk, two driveways,
and asphalt paving.
SUMMARY
The contractor has completed the work as specified in the contract
on January 30, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total amount of the construction cost was $39,479.75.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council accept the work as completed and
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and have recorded
said Notice of Completion document.
aC-PMDA ITEM iUCI
/ t
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
F
7
Name
Street
Address
City &
LState
t_
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.)
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is City of Lake Elsinore
3. The full address of the owner is 130 S. Main Street -
Lake Elsinore, California 92330
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee
it omer man tee, strike "In fee" and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract of purchase;' or "lessee")
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons. if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 30,— 1990 The work done was:
Constructing curb and gutter, sidewalk and two driveways and
pavetrjent.
1. The name D the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was G. M. G. Construction
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a '
wno!e, insert none.1 September 12 1989
(Date of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Lake El s i none
County of Riverside , State of California, and is described as follows: Machado Street
Wideninn TT Prniprt
9. The street address of said property is 32172 Machado
Dated:
Verification for Individual Owner
If no street address has been officially assigned, insert "none")
VERIFICATION
Signature of owner at corporate officer of owner
named in paragraph 2 or his agent
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Services the declarant of the foregoing
('President of "-yanager of", "A partner of", "owner of -. etc.)
notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on k4 e, 12 ,19-2, at 11040 GiSQ �, o
(Date of signature.), California. ..
- (City where signed.)
(Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of
the notice of completion are true.)
; r'l—aN 7A 17,EM ',do. j—,
NOTICE OF COMPLETION-WOLCCTTS FORM 11 t4-REl 6.74 PAGE -� Qr_
9 ot. tvoe or larger
M.TalZi]ulmvtiZ� =01i111W*491
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
MACHADO STREET LANDSCAPING PROJECT
PREPARED BY: jowa APPROVED: �, K .�
J es R. King Ron Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED: 6; q
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
The project was authorized by the City Council on September 26,
1989, and budgeted in Capital Project Account 4826. The work
consisted of providing installation of irrigation systems and park
strip landscaping along selected areas of Machado Street.
SUMMARY
The contractor has completed the work as specified in the contract
on February 16, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total amount of the construction cost was $78,021.00.
Staff recommends that the Council accept the work as completed and
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and have recorded
said Notice of Completion document. --
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
F
Name
Street
Ad:ress
City &
State
L
�
J
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.)
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is _City of Lake Elsinore
3. The full address of the owner is 130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92330
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; in fee.
(If other than fee. strike "In fee" and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract of purchase;' or "lessee") -
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 30 . 1 99QThe work done was:
Con2structing curb and gutter, sidewalk and two driveways and
1. The Fame ofhe contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was G. M. G. Construction
September 12 1989
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none".) (Dale of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Lake El s 1 nor e
County of P i v P r c i d P State of California, and is described as follows: Machado Street
Wideninq II Project
9. The street address of said property is 12172 Machado
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert -mme'a
Dated:
verification for Individual owner
Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner
named in paragraph 2 or his agent
VERIMATION
i, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Services the declarant of the foregoing
("President of", "Manager of", "A partner of", "Owner of", etc.)
notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on 1�f�4� ,19-2-0— atCalifornia.
(Date of signature.) -- (City where signed.)
(Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of
the notice of completion are true.)
9a�
PACE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION—VVOLCCTTS FORM 1, M —R Ev. 6-74 8 pt. type or larger
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT,
16900 WELLS AVENUE
PREPARED BY:APPROVED:
J es R. King Ron Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED: 62"
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
This project was approved by Minor Design Review on July 19, 1989.
It was conditioned to supply the City with a hold harmless
agreement in regard to future natural flooding which may occur.
SUMMARY
As part of the conditions, the applicant has submitted the required
form and has met the satisfaction of the Engineering Department.
(Ref. Attachment "A").
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
1. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the document for
recordation.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to record said document.
RGE,gDA
CF �J
[�'A�C V. ���•nw"
Recording requested by:
CITY of LAKE ELSINORE,
a municipal corporation
When recorded, mail to:
CITY of LAKE ELSINORE
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92330
AGREEMENT to HOLD HARMLESS
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN,
Greeting: Know Ye That Julius P. AROCHA, for and in
consideration of granting a building permit for construction of a
single family residence upon the real property hereafter
described, does and by these presents agrees to Release and Hold
Harmless the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation,
Riverside County, State of California and its assigns from all
manner of actions and causes of action arising from natural
flooding of that certain real property described below as may
occur from adjacent public rights of way, specifically Wells
Avenue and Pope Circle.
Lot 544 of Country Club Heights Unit A, as
recorded in Book 16 pages 59 through 61 inclusive of
Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. The
property is now also known as 16900 Wells Avenue, Lake
Elsinore, California. APN: 378-254-045
Acceptance of this agreement by the City of Lake Elsinore
can be signified by written acceptance or by simply publicly
recording this Agreement with the County Recorder. Cy�
Julius P. AROCHA
Date: August 29, 1989
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
On August 29, 1989 before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
Julius P. AROCHA, (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ATTACHMENT A
PACS 9 GF._
OFFICIAL SEAL
JOHN Y 5 HOWO
"moa. • ^
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
ORANGE COUNTY
Ny comm. expires SEP 21, 1992 i
1
ATTACHMENT A
PACS 9 GF._
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEEDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS
PREPARED BY:� APPROVED: F--� 1
Jqvffes R. King Ron Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
�j Services
APPROVED:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
These projects were approved by the Design Review Board and
conditioned to dedicate the additional street right-of-way as
required by the General Plan to the City or its assignees.
SUMMARY
The following attachments are copies of the documents dedicating
the required street right-of-way, thereby satisfying the
Engineering Department condition.
CITY
PROJECT
PURPOSE
Attachment "A" SFR
780 Acacia
5 ft. street
dedication
Attachment "B" SFR
790 Acacia
5 ft. street
dedication
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
1. Staff recommends that the City Council accept documents for
recordation.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to record said documents on behalf of
the City.
Aiiri'4jA 1 a EN 6 l �
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND, UNLESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW, MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO.
,1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STREET A municipal corporation
ADD.rcSS
OW, 130 South Main Street
7-ElI_Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
PP
M.
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $
❑ computed on full value of property conveyed, or
❑ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
r •:� • • I u v r�• : I v : • • la
hereby GRANT(S) to CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
the following described real property in the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
County of RIVERSIDE
State of California:
THE NORTFIERLY (5) FIVE FEET OF LOT 14 OF ODUNTRY CLUB HEIGIITS, UNIT NO. 6
AS SHa'IN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 12 PAGE 68 OF MAPS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
FOR THE PURPOSE OF 5.0 FOOT STREET DEDICATION
ADDRESS: 780 ACACIA STREET
APN: 373-182-014
Dated February 22, 1990
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS
COUNTYOF RivPrgide
On February 221990 before me, the
undersigned. a Notary Public in and for said State. personalty appeared
Tony f_ Crhiavnna
Catherine J. Schiavone
know to me (or proved to me on the basis of sotisfoctory evidence) to be
the person whose name..] subscribed to the within
inshument a acknowledged that they executed the same.
WfrNESS m h nd an official
Signature
Vicki Lvnne'Kak§ed
Title Order No
Schiavone r
Catherine J.Schiavone
(This area for official notarial seal)
Escrow or Loan No - I I 1
`¢S�.a T5, 1 i 4:.:..:i 746 -e
ATTACHMENT A
PACS
OFFICIAL SEAL
I LYNNE
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
S
,5
NOTARY PUS, iC -CAI • ; .� j
RIVERSIDE
CAUPITY
E"Y mmm. expires MAR <"7, :;_2y
(This area for official notarial seal)
Escrow or Loan No - I I 1
`¢S�.a T5, 1 i 4:.:..:i 746 -e
ATTACHMENT A
PACS
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEEDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS
PREPARED BY: 7 APPROVED:_ Q.pw
JoffeS R. King Ron Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
,Services
APPROVED:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
These projects were approved by the Design Review Board and
conditioned to dedicate the additional street right-of-way as
required by the General Plan to the City or its assignees.
SUMMARY
The following attachments are copies of the documents dedicating
the required street right-of-way, thereby satisfying the
Engineering Department condition.
CITY PROJECT PURPOSE
Attachment "A" SFR 780 Acacia 5 ft. street dedication
Attachment "B" SFR 790 Acacia 5 ft. street dedication
FISCAL IMPACT
None
1. Staff recommends that the City Council accept documents for
recordation.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to record said documents on behalf of
the City.
AG
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND, UNLESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO'.
" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
SmEET A municipal corporation
Aflor:Ess
CT 130 South Main Street
STATE Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
ZIP
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
C'•�i •SID•
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $ -
❑ computed on full value of property conveyed, or
❑ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
hereby GRANT(S) to CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
the following described real property in the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
County of RIVERSIDE
State of California:
THE NORTHERLY (5) FIVE FEET OF LOT 14 OF COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS, UNIT NO. 6
AS SHOVIN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 12 PAGE 68 OF MAPS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
FOR TFE PURPOSE OF 5.0 FOOT STREET DEDICATION
ADDRESS: 780 ACACIA STREET
APN: 373-182-014
Doted February 22, 1990
STATE OF CAUFORMA } ss
couNTvoF Riverside )
On February 22 1990.before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and forsaid State, personalty appeared
Catherine J. Schiavone
personally
know to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be
the= whose name subscribed to the within
instrument a acknowledged that they executed the Same.
NATNEss mh nd an ficial
Signature
Title Order No
any SChia one 1
Catherine J: Schiavone
OFFICIALSEAL
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
a NOTARY PUBLIC - CAt_IP,.
RIVERSIDE DOUrfry
67y comm. esgires NAR 27, 'S°2
(This area for official notarial seal)
Escrow or Loon No - - 1
Tipp ATTACHMENT A
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED VAIL THIS DEED AND. UNLESS'.
OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
'CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
SmEEr A municipal corporation
Ano—`
C,ry 130 South Main Street
STZ, [Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 J
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) , .
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is S
D computed on full value of property conveyed, or
'D computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
r ♦�• rl u w I�•�I •�• rla�
hereby GRANT(S)to CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
the following described real property in the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
County of RIVERSIDE State of California:
THE NORTHERLY (5) FIVE FEET OF LCT 16 OF COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS, UNIT NO. 6
AS SHOt,1N BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 12 PAGE 68 OF MAPS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
ADDRESS: 790 ACACIA STREET
WORN
Dated
373-182-016
February 22, 1990
STATE OF CALIFOTNIA i S
COUNTYOFRi�i�rcid2 f
o`'���a��1990 uetoae me. the
unners:gned, a Notory Pobhc in ena for se',d State p rsonavy ecoc- ed
Tony C. Srhiavonp
Catherinp J1 Srhiavnnp
,now is me (a, Proved fa mo an the t S.s c1 SOLS!CCbNG+idenCe) robe
•^e oc s e v n r norr S 1-osv.ced to Ile rdn:r.
01:111 e+t a. ac no..'edpec !'c' _ e•Ku'eo 1. ine
se
%'.!T r j�.or a ion V s V
ka
C
Lhe Oroer No.
I
TonyS�chie V,
Catherine J.'SchiavoneJ.`Schiavone
OFFICIAL SEAL i
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
•� = PJOIARY PUBLIC - CALIFCt: NiA I\
RIVERSIDE COJAR
t, y comm. expires tdAR Z7, 19;2 1
•Int G'tra '> a' C nCa:b Y.-0-.
Escrow or Loan No
h1AIL TAX SI ATTACHMENT BID ABOVE.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: FINAL APPROVAL OF TRACT MAPS 24138, 24139, 24215
i
PREPARED BY: ho
APPROVED BY•Q
Ray O'Donnell Ron Kirchner
Senior Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED BY: QL11
Ron Molen k
City Manager
BACKGROUND
Tentative Tracts Map 24138, 24139, and 24215 were approved by City
Council on May 23, 1989. This development is located north of
Grand Avenue and west of Corydon between Ontario Way and Skylark
Drive. (See attachment)
SUMMARY
The final map conforms substantially to the approved tentative map;
and all City Council conditions of approval pertaining to the final
map have been or will be completed prior to recordation. All bonds
have been posted and the subdivision agreement has been submitted
and is in the City Clerk's office for execution.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the final map, subject to the
acceptance of being true and accurate,
no grading can occur until the street
improvement plans have been approved,
maintenance agreement has been agreed
County and the City of Lake Elsinore.
City Engineer's
with the condition that
and storm drain
and a storm drain
upon between Riverside
2. Authorize the City Clerk to sign said map and arrange for
recordation.
3. Accept the drainage easement, slope easement, and authorize
the City Clerk to have said recorded with the final map.
4. Accept Tracts into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance
District.
PACE / OF
VICINITY
LAKE
EL SNORE
G
RA/LROAD
_urY o' aswoRF
COUNTY Of'
o R/YERSJOc�', .
i
AGEFbuA ITEM NO.
PAGE-2—Or
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF QUITCLAIM DEEDS FOR
WATER RIGHTS FOR VARIOUS CITY PROJECTS
PREPARED BY: APPROVED:
ames R. King Ron Kirchner
Associate Civil Engineer Director of Public
Services
APPROVED: 941y
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
These projects were approved by the Design Review Board and
conditioned to dedicate the Underground Water Rights to the City.
SUMMARY
The following attachments are copies of these documents dedicating
Underground Water Rights to this agency or its assignees.
Attachment "A"
Attachment "B"
Attachment "C"
FISCAL IMPACT
None
CITY PROJECT
SFR 780 Acacia
SFR 790 Acacia
Industrial 89-9
A.P. NUMBER
373-182-014
373-182-016
377-050-075
RECOMMENDATION
1. Staff recommends that the City Council accept documents for
recordation.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to record said documents on behalf of
the City.
J
PACE OF
Recording requested by:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
A municipa3e corporation
When recorded, mail to:
•CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Above space for Recorder
QUIT CLAIM DEED
Water Rights
APN# 373-182-014
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, TONY C. SCHIAVONE and CATHERIINE J. SCHIAVONE,
HUSBAND AMID WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS.
does/do hereby REMISE, RELEASE, DEDICATE AND FOREVER
QUITCLAIM tp the City of lake Elsinore, a municipal
corporation or its assignees, any and all water rights
incidents and appurtenant to the real property located in
the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, State of
California, described as: 780 ACACIA STREET
I.O/T 14 OF COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNIT NO 6 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE
IN BOOK 12 PAGE 68 OF MAPS OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA.
Dated February 22. 1990
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
TO C. SCHIAVONE
CATHERINE J. SCHIAVONE
On February 22 ,19gn, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
—_ TONY C. SCHIAVONE AND CATHERINE J. SCHIAVONE known to
me, whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged that they executed the same.
Witness my hand and official seal. Ic
OFFICIAL SEAL Vicki Lynne Ka d
VICKI LYNtFE UIT
y f70TARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA
R�YFRSIDE tAU"!TY n
u..o�^ - 81y Comm. expires MAR 27. 1992 i> dL
PACT
~~ aTT❑rnMCAIT ❑
Recording requested by:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
A municipal corporation
When recorded, mail to:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Above space for Recorder
QUIT CLAIM DEED
Water Rights
APN# 373-182-016
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, TONY C SCIIAVONE and CAliHM= J. S Hr
HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS
does/do hereby REMISE, RELEASE, DEDICATE AND FOREVER
QUITCLAIM to the City of lake Elsinore, a municipal
corporation or its assignees, any and all water rights
incidents and appurtenant to the real property located in
the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, State of
California, described as: 790 ACACIA STREET
LOT 16 OF COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS, UNIT NO 6, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE
IN BOOK 12 PAGE 68 OF MAPS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Dated February 22, 1990
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
TONY/ c. SCHI�AVO/N7E
BY r t
CAT'HERIN0J, SCHIAVONE
On February 22, ,1990, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
Tony C. Schiavone and Catherine J. Schiavone known to
me, whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged that they executed the amen.
Witness my hand and official seal. �,i
7AD
Vicki Lynne Kas 1I
VICKI LYN° GEcNDA gTEA NO
NOTAL: INcURIVERSIDk AGEMy n -m. e�Di,
I111/t �. 111'1 L IYI p
Recording requested by:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
A municipal corporation
When recorded, mail to:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Above space for Recorder
QUIT CLAIM DEED
Water Rights
APN# 377-05-0075-6
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, ARCHER, DAVID G. & BONNY L.
does/do hereby REMISE, RELEASE, DEDICATE AND FOREVER
QUITCLAIM to the City of lake Elsinore, a municipal
corporation or its assignees, any and all water rights _
incidents and appurtenant to the real property located in
the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, State of
California, described as: Grove/Lot #123 in Forest No. 9
of Elsinore Eucalyptus Tract. 1HDUS7-2/!IL 89-9
Dated Feb. 16, 1990
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
CALIFORNIA)
San Die o)ss
F'146HEI
Bonny'L. Archer
On Feb. 16 ,1990, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
David G Archer & Bonny L Archer known to
me, whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged that they executed the same.
Witness my hand and off
,.-.z.,�• Cr hI •l S6.L
GE -40A ITEkbi %�.
AGE -40A -
�SAL.1 CdtGJ C -9tt
`; i2r„Ms�ion :,paes Acrd 25. 1933 OF�,��,„«.
••• ••�v �i��l111 V
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 89-3 - CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AT THE
REQUEST OF DELEO CLAY TILE.
A request to amend the Parking Ordinance, Chapter
17.66.030.0 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, to
allow flexibility and/or reduce parking requirements for
single manufacturing enterprises. This amendment will
affect parking requirements for all future
industrial/manufacturing development applications.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for
tr public inspection.
I
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED V eVEz
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA 17c'L;. 1_ i �_A�—
PAGE OF� -
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: ZONE CHANGE 90-1 - MACLEOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
A request to change the zoning from C-1 (PUD) and R-3
(PUD) (Neighborhood Commercial -Planned Unit Development
Overlay and High Density Residential District -Planned
Unit Development) to R-1 (Single -Family Residential
District -Hillside Planned Development Overlay) for a 46
gross acre site. The proposal is to bring the zoning
into conformance with the General Plan designation,
which is required under State Law, Government Code
Section 65860.
LOCATION: The proposed Zone Change is related to, and on the same
site as approved Tract 19358 and Residential Project
89-11. The above site is located south of Grand Avenue,
865 feet east of Ortega Highway and 1,065 feet west of
Blanche Drive.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for ublic inspection.
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
_2'
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO.i
PAGE OF�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24490 = JONES & TOMICH
A request to subdivide 7.6 net acres into 35 R-1 (Single
-Family Residential District) lots.
LOCATION: The project is located approximately 1,500 feet west of
Shirley Drive, south of Washington Avenue, east of
Michigan Street.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for public inspection.
1.
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED >
ICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM
PAGE OE_�__
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-9; ZONE CHANGE 89-10; VARIANCE
90-1; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25106 AND COMMERCIAL PROJECT
89-6 = TOMISLAV GABRIC & ASSOCIATES.
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from
Specific Plan Area to General Commercial; to consider a
Zone Change request from Specific Plan to General
Commercial (C-2); a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-way
division of property; deletion of Specific Plan
Designation for the parcel; a Variance necessary to
reduce front yard setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet; and
to construct an office/retail center of 80,627 square
feet, consisting of 5 buildings in one and two-story
configuration.
LOCATION: The proposed project consists of approximately seven (7)
acres of land lying on the south side of Parkway Avenue,
north side of Lakeshore Drive, west side of 6th Avenue
and east side of 7th Avenue.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available iCIKIKA
public inspection.
1
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
AD, CITY'CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO. _1_1L'
PAGE_4-OF—,L —
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-14 AND ZONE CHANGE 89-14 -
TMP INVESTMENTS.
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to
include the site designation of Low Density Residential
(0-6.9 dwelling units/acre); to consider the pre -zoning
of the site to Low Density Residential.
LOCATION: The project consists of 36.79 acres of land, lying south
of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald Avenue, north
of the current City boundary.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for.public inspection.
11
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
2j;t: C7 J i /
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO.11=R
PAGE OF -1—
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-15 AND ZONE CHANGE 89-17 -
BROOKSTONE DEVELOPMENT, INC.
A proposal for a General Plan Amendment to designate
15.29 acres on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint
Streets as limited Industrial Land Use, from
Environmental Sensitive; to consider a Zone Change
request from R-1 to M-1.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available foo public inspection.
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
VICKI KASAD, CITY C� L RK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE—L, OF�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1 AND ZONE CHANGE 90-2 -
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from
Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential; to
consider a Zone Change request from C-1 (Neighborhood
Commercial) and C -P (Commercial Park) to R-3 (High
Density Residential), on a 6.042 acre parcel.
LOCATION: The project is located at the southeast corner of Grand
Avenue and Macy Street. The applicant is proposing to
build a 132 unit apartment building on the site.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for public inspection.
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
VICKI KASAD,
CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO_�L=-
PAGE_ --i OF --L—
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March, 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-2 - JONES/TOMICH
A request to amend the General Plan designation from
Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential, for a
7.6 net acre site, located approximately 1,500 feet west
of Shirley Drive, south of Washington Avenue, east of
Michigan Street. The proposal is related to Tentative
Tract Map 24490, a proposal to create 35 R-1 (Low
Density Residential) lots.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for public inspection.
DATE: March 1, 1990 SIGNED
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: March 14, 1990
AGENDA ITEM NO..
PAGE OF
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held
by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 27th day of
March , 1990, in the District Board Room, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
Elsinore, California, at 7:00 p.m., relative to the following:
PROJECT: Demolition of structure
LOCATION: 29310 Pinnell Street, Lake Elsinore
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place, all
interested persons are invited to attend and be heard in favor of or
opposition to said matter, either orally or by written communication
to the City Council.
For further particulars, all interested persons are invited
to call at the office of the City Clerk where information regarding
this matter is on file and available for public inspection.
DATE: SIGNED
VICKI KASAD,`CI Y CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ON:
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE—,Z—OF__L_
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
IyMy(a):NIk'10) V
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON MOLENDYK, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 24624 AND DISCUSSION OF PROJECT REVISIONS -
CENTEX
This matter was continued from the City Council meetings of
February 13 and February 27, 1990 in order for staff to meet
with the neighbors and the applicant to work out some issues
relative to buffer parcel sizes, minimum lot sizes,
circulation issues, view protection for properties along
Vista View, and other issues as indicated in the February 27,
1990 memo from Ron Molendyk to the City Council.
Following is a list of project revisions which were worked
out between the neighbors and the project proponents:
1. Mango Street will be conditioned to be barricaded
until such time that the extension of "I" Street is
completed through the Pacific Scene property to the
north
2. The lots located immediately adjacent to Vista View
will be larger and approximately 18 to 20 feet deeper
than previously proposed, which should help protect
views. The finished grades will also be lower than
the previous plans by 2 or 3 feet. The resultant lots
will be at least 7,200 square feet in size and more in
compliance with the 75% buffer provisions of the code.
3. A proposed condition of approval will limit large
commercial vehicles on the "I" Street extension north
of Grand Avenue.
4. Small lots located adjacent to Vista View will be
limited to single -story structures to protect views
(see attached conditions of approval).
5. The applicant will be conditioned to enter into an
agreement to resolve the filling of the drainage ditch
behind Vista View (see attached conditions of
approval).
In summary, it is staffs opinion that all of the neighbors
concerns relative to this project have been resolved. At the
last meeting between the neighbors, the developer, and staff
on this matter, the representatives for the neighbors
indicated that the latest revisions to the plan adequately
addressed their concerns. Both the developer and the
neighborhood representatives had to compromise over the view
issue, the homeowners agreed to accept assurances of balcony
views rather than ground level views and the applicants
increased lot sizes and increased the number of single -story
homes to reduce view impacts.
It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm
Environmental Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract
Map 24624 based on the findings and subject to the conditions
listed in the February 13, 1990 staff report and new
conditions of approval, and the conditions contained in the
February 13, 1990 staff memo to the Council.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE + OF
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624 - CENTEX
1. Mango Street shall be constructed as indicated on the
approved Exhibit. However, until the construction of "I"
Street through the project to Robb Road is completed,
Mango Street shall be barricaded at the project boundary
to prohibit access to non -emergency vehicular traffic.
Said barricade shall be of a crash -gate design acceptable
to the Sheriff and Fire Department. The design shall
provide for passage of bicycles and pedestrains.
Developer shall provide potential buyers with notice
prior to close of escrow as to the future opening of
Mango.
2. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall
reach an agreement with the affected property owners of
the lots on adjacent Tract 18719-2 relative to the
filling in of the drainage swale and the removal of the
existing concrete channel. Said agreement shall identify
specific tasks for which the developer is responsible for
accomplishing, including timing of work and cost
arrangements. In the event that the property owners and
the applicant cannot reach agreement, the matter shall be
referred back to the City Council for resolution.
3. A six foot block wall or combination block wall and
wrought iron fence shall be constructed along the
perimeter property lines of all lots.
4. Lots 411-421 shall be limited to single -story in height.
Lots 376, 372 and 373 will also be single -story.
5. In the event that the School District determines that the
proposed on-site school site is not desirable, then the
developer shall be permitted to construct the area
designated for the school as single-family lots in
accordance with alternate "A" dated February 22, 1990. A
revised final map shall be submitted indicating same for
final approval.
6. Applicant shall install a City approved sign limiting
commercial truck traffic (to a maximum weight of five (5)
tons) along proposed "I" Street.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE Z OF 2 %
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624
Planning Division:
1. Tentative Tract Map 24624 will expire two (2) years after City
Council approval date, unless extended as provided by the State
of California Subdivision Map Act.
2. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots
shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
3. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project prohibiting
on -street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers and trucks
over one (1) ton capacity. CC & R's shall also include
screening any ground mounted base disk and no roof -mounted or
front yard disk shall be allowed. CC & R's shall be subject to
the approval of the Community Development Director, or
designee, prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC &
R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of
Occupancy for the units when developed in the future.
4. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans,
landscaping and fences/walls shall required Minor Design Review
approval prior to issuance of building permits. All standards
of development and procedural steps in effect at the Minor
Design Review submittal shall apply for this project.
5. A combination of walls and/or fences shall be constructed
generally around the perimeter of the subdivision and also
constructed adjacent to Grand Avenue, "I" Street and adjacent
to the McVicker Canyon Flood Control Channel (Lot "A").
Precise design, materials, color and wall/fence location shall
be determined through the Minor Design Review process.
6. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of
utilities.
7. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of landscape and
irrigation plans for model homes (if such are desired), back-up
wall areas, street trees and slope planting in accord with the
City Landscape Guidelines, prior to issuance of building
permits. At least one (1) model home to include a Xeriscape
landscaping theme.
8. Signage for this subdivision shall require City Permits.
9. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage
shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior
to installation.
10. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the
Planning Division.
11. Prior to issuance of building permits, subdivider shall provide
assurance that all required fees have been paid to the Lake
Elsinore Unified School District.
12. Comply with all conditions of the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District.
13. Prior to approval of a Final Tract Map approval by the City
Council, all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the
minimum dimensional standards of the R-1 Zoning District.
14. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting District is
required prior to approval of a Final Tract Map.
15. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Depart-
ment. AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF�W
OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624 CONTINUED
16. Comply with applicable environmental mitigation measures
contained in Environmental Impact Report 88-2.
a) Architectural standards shall be implemented at Minor
Design Review to minimize interior noise intrusion
and to provide exterior noise -sheltered environments.
b) The proposed project shall be consistent with all
applicable criteria outlined in the City's General
Plan, the grading standards identified in Ordinance
No. 801, grading ordinance and Ordinance No. 722,
Hillside Planned Development Overlay District.
c) The subdivision grading plan shall preserve the oak
grove area identified on Figure 33 of EIR 88-2
(Sensitive Species and Communities).
d) Native plant material shall be used for re-landscap-
ing
elandscap-
ing of cut and fill slopes. Slope and erosion
control plans shall be submitted and approved prior
to the issuance of grading permit.
e) The fresh water willow pond located on the southern
corner of the proposed park shall be set aside and
protected from intrusion from the local mining
operation. A single coast live oak overlooking the
pond shall also be preserved if possible, if not re-
place at a ratio of 10:1 with two year growth trees,
20:1 at one year and 30:1 if less than one year
mature.
f) All structures shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet
from all known active faults and will be designed in
accordance with the Uniform Building Code and
applicable City Codes to ensure safety in event of an
earthquake.
g) All grubbing and clearing in the area shown on Figure
39 of EIR 88-2 shall be monitored by a qualified
archaeologist. If cultural material is encountered,
the archaeologist will have the power to halt
grubbing and clearing so that the material can be
evaluated. If the material constitutes a site, a
test program will be implemented to determine
subsurface boundaries, depth and content. Depending
on the results of the test, a data recovery program
may be necessary.
h) Should a City-wide or area -wide fee program be
adopted by the City for increase in police services,
this project shall be required to participate along
with adjacent projects.
17. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required.
Applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1)
year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is
rough graded.
18. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit,
subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of
Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department.
Community Services
19. The City will accept Parcel "C" consisting of approximately
four (4) plus acres as a park site.
20. The developer will receive credits against park -in -lieu fees
for the park dedication with the balance of the fees being used
for park development as a turn -key (developed) park.
AGENDA ITEM NO. — -- .
PAGE 4 OF
C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624
21. The City will accept the up -slopes on Grand Avenue with the
Landscape Maintenance District. No other areas outside of the
road right-of-way will be accepted.
Engineering Department:
22. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued.
23. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code;
Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from
the Engineering Department.
24. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26).
25. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water district, stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project.
Submit this letter prior to final map approval.
26. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
27. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared
by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and
constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards,
latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
12.04 and 16.34).
28. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12,
Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78).
29. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar)
shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final
inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
30. "I" Street from Grand Avenue to northerly tract boundary shall
have a 80 foot right-of-way with 64 foot curb -to -curb, a land-
scaped median, a 6 foot parkway on the west side and a 10 foot
parkway on the east side. The east side parkway shall have a 6
foot sidewalk the entire length and the west side parkway shall
have a 6 foot sidewalk from Grand Avenue to the first street
north of "I-1" Court.
31. Broadway from Grand Avenue to "F" Street shall have 66 foot
right-of-way with 48 foot curb -to -curb.
32. All local streets shall have 60 foot right-of-way with 40 foot
curb -to -curb. Restricted local streets (cul-de-sacs) shall
have 50 foot right-of-way with 36 foot curb -to -curb and a 3
foot utility easement on each side.
33. No single-family lots shall have ingress or egress to collector
streets or higher volume traffic streets.
34. "I" Street from Grand Avenue to "F" Court shall have 80 foot
right-of-way and 64 foot curb -to -curb. DELETED
35. If the West Elsinore Assessment District improvements have not
been installed which will be needed for this tract, then this
developer will be required to construct the infrastructure for
circulation, utilities and flood protection as required by the
City Engineer and Riverside County Flood Control.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE S OFJGt
OF APPROVAL FOR
N
TRACT MAP 24624
36. Dedicate sufficient land along Audelo for a 66 foot
right -o£ -way and provide improvements for one parking lane and
two travel lanes (30 feet).
37. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by
Riverside County Fire Department.
38. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on
street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer.
39. Lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted
by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance
or conveyed to a drainage easement.
40. Contribute $1,480 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign
Program.
41. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello Roos
Community Facilities District (CFD) for infrastructure
improvements and operation and maintenance for the West
Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement District. No Certificate
of Occupancy will be issued for lots sold until the West
Elsinore Improvement District has been formed.
42. Applicant shall obtain all necessary easements for off-site
grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map
approval.
43. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for
construction of public works improvements and post appropriate
bonds.
44. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall be submitted, reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer and Riverside County Flood
Control District prior to final map approval.
45. All major drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District standard
and agreement entered into with the District for construction,
ownership and maintenance.
46. Developer shall meet all conditions of Riverside County Flood
Control District for development of this site.
47. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street
design recommendations. Provide final Soils Report showing
compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification.
48. All storm facilities shall provide tract and downstream
property owners with 100 year storm flood protection and be
approved by the City Engineer.
49. Temporary access/right-of-way shall be provided to the Bishop
parcel, and permanent access shall be provided and recorded
with the final map.
50. All attempts will be made to dedicate area sufficient to
coincide with the County's trail system, at the beginning of
the terminus to match as closely as possible with that trail
system. A final design and required dedication to be directed
by the Community Development Director and if he is unable to do
it then it shall come back to the Commission.
51. City to draft a reimbursement agreement for the oversizing of
"I" Street.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE lD O5�7 f-\,
r r
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON MOLENDYK, CITY MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624 - CENTEX
As directed by City Council, staff met with representatives
of the residents of the area and Centex Homes on February 22,
1990. The residents presented nine (9) issues for
discussions. These issues included:
1. Minimum lot size of 7200 square feet.
2. Compliance with the 75% buffer provision.
3. Closure of Mango Street.
4. Closure of Mountain Avenue.
5. Location of the proposed school and trail.
6. Construction of walls or fences by Centex along the
rear of properties fronting Vista View and Forest
View.
7. The raising of elevations of properties along Vista
View by Centex by filling in the existing drainage
ditch.
8. Prohibiting large commercial vehicles on the
extension of Lincoln Street.
9. Protection of views to the Lake for properties
abutting the project along Vista View.
The parties agreed on six of the nine (9) items pending
approval of the language of the conditions implementing these
provisions. However, issues related to lot size, buffering
and view preservation are not yet resolved and require
further discussions.
As a result of this meeting, staff recommends continuance of
the item until your meeting of March 13, 1990. Staff, the
residents and Centex will meet again on February 28, 1990 to,
hopefully, finally resolve the remaining issues.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 7 OF
PAGE FOUR - CITLUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 1990
�. Tentative Tract Mag 24618 = George Wim a Morr' Homes
A re to subdivide 10.24 acres int lots averaging
7,260 squa eet. The site is zo R-1 (Single -Family
Residential Di ct. The pro y is located approxi-
mately 850 feet so of Gr. Avenue, east of Grandview
Avenue and west of Ort wy.
C. Tentative Tract 25442 = Do euvers & Sharon Gibson.
A
rangin n size from .58 net acres to .99 acres
loc d in the R-1 District (Single -Family Res i tial
trict). The property is located west of Roberts
Street and north of Shrier Drive.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
31. Tentative Tract Map 24634 = Centex Homes.
A request to subdivide 206.33 acres into 603 single-family
residential lots. The project is generally located south of
the extension of Mountain Avenue and west of the terminus of
Broadway Avenue.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request
and the previous related discussions. He detailed some of the
improvements to be provided by the developer, including an 80
foot roadway to be the extension of Lincoln, a multi-purpose
trail system, a 3.9 acre park adjacent to Terra Cotta Junior
High School, improvement of Broadway St., and an elementary
school site. He also reviewed the new and revised conditions
presented this evening.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. asking
those in favor of Tentative Tract Map 24634 to speak. The
following person spoke:
Mike Aller, representing Centex Homes, clarified the unit
count for this development is 590 units. He also detailed the
proposed McVicker Canyon Park.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. The
following people spoke:
Robin Johnson, 15018 Vista View, advised that the residents in
the surrounding area have formed a committee to work out the
impacts of this development on existing residents. He further
advised that the following are major concerns of the residents
1) 100,000 gallon water storage tank to be installed; 2)
construction related traffic increase; 3) need for extensive
landscaping along 80 foot street; 4) timing of completed
street improvements; 5) lot sizes in border areas of tract.
He suggested that this item be postponed to allow the
residents time to work with the developer to mitigate
concerns.
Dennis Johnson, 15026 Vista View, advised that on his street
the major concerns are the impact on their view, for which
they paid premium prices on the lots; development in the area
of the flood control easement; and the waiver of the 75%
calculation in the border areas. He inquired how promises
from the developer could be guaranteed, if the concerns are
resolved. He also suggested that this item be continued.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF'2-0
r r
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 1990
John Sellars, 16510 Mountain Street, also requested that this
item be continued. He commented on previous similar
discussions relating to the Pacific Scene development. He
further expressed concern with the traffic impacts and water
storage tanks. He also commented that he feels the problems
can be worked out with the developer, it more time is given to
resolve them.
Mike Miller, 15012 Vista View, commented on the price paid for
his property for increase view and recreational vehicle
iaeu Ly 1; le
original developer and his belief that the Council should
assure that buyers are properly informed.
Sherry Dupre, new resident of Vista View, advised that she has
been a resident of the existing tract for one week and already
has concerns about traffic flow.
Dennis Wilson, 15035 Vista View, expressed concern with the
flood control ditch behind Forest Street and traffic flow.
Cathy Littlejohn, Rolando Street, expressed concern with the
future potential for use of Running Deer. She suggested that
wider notification of property owners be considered, as she
feels the 300 foot radius is inadequate.
Mayor Winkler closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:15 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:25 P.M.
Mayor Winkler advised that a report had been provided during
the recess and requested further information on the report.
Mr. Aller, representing Centex advised that this is the
resolution proposal they have reached for mitigation of view
impacts.
Councilman Starkey inquired how the 50% spacing of single
story homes would be done. Mr. Aller advised that it would be
every other house to make it fair for everyone.
City Attorney Harper advised that the conditions in the report
should be made a part of the conditions of approval.
Council discussion ensued with regard to time frame for
construction of McVicker Park, improvements to be completed as
part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District,
consideration of the final Development Agreement, and
mitigation of traffic concerns.
Mayor Winkler suggested continuance of this item to the next
council meeting and requested that all of the conditions be
pulled together in one document for that consideration.
Councilman Buck inquired as to the timing of the Development
Agreement and whether the tract and the agreement should be
considered jointly.
A representative of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District
advised that the development agreement affects all of the
developers in the assessment district.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
OF THOSE PRESENT TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM AT 9:01
P.M. AND CONTINUE IT TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
t
PAGE OF�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dave Gunderman, Community Development Director
DATE: February 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Additional and/or Revised Conditions for
Tentative Tract 24624
New Conditions:
1. Applicant shall install a City approved sign limiting
commercial truck traffic along proposed "I" Street.
2. Applicant shall provide a striped Class II street bikeway
along both sides of Grand Avenue and along "I" Street,
except along the westerly side of the project boundary
north of the open space (Lot "C") parcel where the bikeway
shall be included within the all purpose recreational
trail.
3. Broadway Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with the
construction of the model homes for Phase I.
4. In the event that a school site is required on site, a
revised tentative map shall be submitted for approval by
the Council.
5. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello
Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for
infrastructure improvements and operation and maintenance
for the West Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement District.
No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for lots sold
until the West Elsinore Improvement District has been
formed. As a participant in the West Lake Elsinore
Infrastructure Improvement District, it is understood that
a Development Agreement and a Funding/Acquisition
Agreement is being drafted and should be executed by the
City and property owner prior to the property owner vote
that approves the special taxes to be levied by the
District.
Revised Conditions
1. Condition No. 49 should be revised to read: Applicant
shall provide temporary point of access to Mr. Bishop
(owner of adjacent 40 acre parcel located northwest of the
subject parcel). Said access shall be indicated on the
final map and the applicant and Mr. Bishop shall enter
into an agreement which acknowledges the access and
provides for a sunset provision in the event that the
Bishop property obtains secondary access upon development.
2. Condition 19 should be revised to read: The City will
accept Parcels "B" and "C" for open space and/or park
purposes.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF U
r r
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: February 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 24624• Centex Homes: a
request for approval of a Tentative Map to sub-
divide 203.4 acres into 589 single family lotm,
one open space lot of 2,3+ acres, and one 4.0+
acre lot for park purposes. located south nf the
extension of Mountain Avenue and west of the
terminus of Broadway Avenue
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY
G y Thornhill Dave derman
Planning Manager Comm. ev. Dir.
APPROVED BY:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
The Planning Commission, on January 17, 1990, on a 4-0 vote,
recommended approval of the request. There was a substantial
amount of discussion relative to the dedication of -an all
purpose trail proposed along "I" Street. The Commission
recommended adoption of Condition 50 as follows:
Condition No. 50: All attempts will be made to dedicate area
sufficient to coincide with the County's
trail system, at the beginning of the
terminus to match as closely as possible
with that trail system. A final design
and required dedication to be directed by
the Community Development Director and if
he is unable to do it then is shall come
back to the Commission.
Since the Commission hearing on this matter, staff and the
applicant met to discuss the proposed street and trail
sections, and conclude that the trail should be located
within the 80 (eighty) foot street section. Further, it is
proposed that the recreation trail be 10 (ten) feet in width
(5 (five) feet for bikepath, 5 (five) feet for sidewalk),
divided by a white painted stripe, and composed of 2 (two)
inches of asphalt base (see attached Exhibit B).
There also were numerous changes in conditions, as reflected
in the Planning Commission minutes. The most substantial
change was to Condition No. 30, requiring "I" Street to have
an 80 (eighty) foot, rather than a 75 (seventy-five) foot
right-of-way.
The City Council, on December 12, 1989, approved a General
Plan Amendment from Specific Plan/Floodway/Floodplain to Low
Density Residential for this site.
DISCUSSION
This property is
Assessment District
with the project,
located within the
The Environmental
as well as the
West Lake Elsinore
Impacts associated
district itself, were
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
annG /1 nP C)
r
Page 2
February 13, 1990
Subject: Tentative Tract Map 24624
Centex Homes
r
analyzed under EIR 88-2, which was certified by the Council
on December 12, 1989.
Staff and the applicants have met several times to address
.issues of density. traffin_nirciilatinn hnffcrinn of ar94annn+
residential lots, and park land issues. J
The most current revision, in staff's opinion, addresses the
above referenced concerns, and is compatible with surrounding
properties. The project density is 2.9 units/acre, Lincoln
("I" Street on the map), is now four lanes, and approximately
4.0 acres of land adjacent to the school site will be
dedicated for park purposes.
It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm
Environmental Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract
Map 24624 base on the findings listed, and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings
1. The Tentative Tract Map complies with Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the City's General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance.
2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's
Subdivision Standards and the State Subdivision Map Act.
3. Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 previously certified
by the City Council, has satisfactorily addressed
anticipated environmental impacts of this Tentative Tract
Map. _
4. The project, as conditioned, will be compatible with
existing and proposed development in the immediate area
and will have minimal adverse impacts on abutting
properties.
5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map, as conditioned, includes
a number of public benefits, including drainage and flood
control improvements, a public park site, an open space
dedication, a bike trail and transportation and
circulation improvements.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE -LL OF2.0
A�
mm
AGENDA ITEM NO.-
PAGE
O.-PAGE JL OF ID
C r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 CONTINUED
At thji's time, 7:23 p.m., Commissioner Wilsey left the table
Cha i n Brown asked if the proposal was on sched a for the
meeting the 7th.
Planning Man er Thornhill stated that this de nds on whether
or not we can ge together with the applicant nd the property
owners' represent ive again prior to the xt meeting. There
is a meeting tentati y scheduled for onday, January 22,
1990.
Chairman Brown informed
this item, that staff has
February 7th with a p
again.
Motion by Commissioner Sa&thoff to
23988 to February 7, 199 , second by
Approved 3-0 (Commissi er Wilsey abs
h the audience present for
this item be continued to
that it could be continued
ntinue Tentative Tract Map
mmissioner Gilenson.
en from the table)
3. Tentative Parcel cap 25157 - Bainbrid Investment, Inc. -
Chairman Browns t41'ed that staff has request that this item
be continued o February 21, 1990, and ked if there was
anyone in th audience here for this item. Receiving no
response, airman Brown called for a motion.
Motion /5y Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tent"iv
e Parcel
Map 715157 to February 21, 1990, second by Co issioner
Gilenson.
Zis
oved 3-0 (Commissioner Wilsey absent from the table)
Attime,7:26 p.m., Commissioner Wilsey returned to the tab
4. Tentative Tract Map 24624 - Centex Homes - Planning Manager
Thornhill presented a proposal to subdivide 203.4 acres into
589 single-family lots, generally located south of the
extension of Mountain Avenue and west of the terminus of
Broadway Avenue.
Anticipated environmental impacts for this proposal are
addressed by Environmental Impact Report 88-2 which was
certified by the City Council on December 12, 1989.
Planning Manager Thornhill stated that the Engineering
Department has requested that condition number 34 be deleted,
and condition number 30 amended to read, as follows:
Condition No. 30: "I" Street from Grand Avenue to northerly
tract boundary shall have an 80 foot
right-of-way with 64 foot curb -to -curb, a
landscaped median, a 6 foot parkway on the
west side and a 10 foot parkway on the
east side. The east side parkway shall
have a 6 foot sidewalk the entire length
and the west side parkway shall have a 6
foot sidewalk from Grand Avenue to the
first street north of "I -I" Court."
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. asking if
anyone wished to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map 24624.
Mr. Mike Aller, Centex Homes,
conditions of approval; however,
review the revised condition
like to request that staff work
for that portion of the design
development.
stated that they agree with the
has not had an opportunity to
on the roadway width, and would
with us regarding reimbursement
that is over the needs of this
AGENDA ITEM O.
PAGE OF U
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 4
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624
Mr. Aller stated that the exact unit count is 590, and the
density --thinks it is important to include the park site of 26
acres which is to the south of the project. Once you consider
that into our total acreage the density is reduced to 2.6
dwelling units per acre, which is below the adjacent
development. ,
Mr. Aller commented on condition number 16.e. pertaining to the
preservation of the single coast live oak tree, stating the
problem with the tree is that it is located directly in the
centerline of the flood control channel that the assessment
district is building. We would like this reworded that we will
replace that tree with a 10:1 ratio to be planted in the oak
grove, which is a 2.37 acre parcel, or plant the trees in the
rectangular riparian area.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
Tentative Parcel Map 24624. Receiving no response, Chairman
Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving
no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on
the matter.
Mr. William Bishop, 40492 Corta Lucia, Murrieta stated that his
property touches the Centex property line for about 40 feet at
Lot #592. Concerned with the access to his property at the
southeast corner. Requested that the approval of Lots 590 and
591 be delayed until he can have discussions with Centex,
Butterfield Engineering and the Planning Division about this
access.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak
on the matter.
Mr. Robin Johnson, 15018 Vista View, commented on the impacts
on the neighborhood pertaining to traffic and possible loss of
view.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak
on the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed
the public hearing at 7:45 p.m.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on the restriction of access
Mr. Bishop referred to. Considerable discussion ensued on this
access.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on the northerly extension of
"I" Street, and the need for stop signs to be placed at some of
the intersections.
Commissioner Wilsey commented as follows:
- condition number 16.e., pertaining to the oak tree, asked
about the tree planting formula used for Cottonwood Hills and
whether or not this formula could be adopted for this
proposal.
- Suggested that the developer get together with the property
owners in the area and alleviate any concerns.
- The multi-purpose trail running through the development,
recommended the following be added as as a condition:
"Project shall coordinate with the City and the Riverside
County Parks Department to construct the portion of the
recreational trail system that runs through the project."
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ( — OF 7'0-
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 5
TRACT MAP 24624
Discussion ensued on the multi-purpose trail system with regard
to dedication of land, width of trail, development of design
standards, and responsibility of maintenance.
Commissioner Saathoff suggested dedication and construction of
a multi-purpose trail with approval subject to the Community
Development Director or his designee.
Commissioner Wilsey commented on the requirement for multi-
purpose trail system placed on adjacent tracts, and the need to
complete the design criteria for said trail systems.
Discussion ensued on the multi-purpose trail system with regard
to requiring dedication of land only; location of said trail;
trail system to come back before the Commission, and
elimination of the Class "A" Bike Trail for the all purpose
trail.
Chairman Brown commented as follows:
- Condition number 4, change the word "grading" to "building".
- Condition number 7, delete the words "or grading".
- Condition number 16.d., add .second sentence: "Slope and
erosion control plans shall be submitted and approved prior
to the issuance of grading permit."
- Condition number 16.e., add: "if possible, if not replace
at a ratio of 10:1 with two year growth trees, 20:.1 at one
year and 30:1 if less than one year mature.
- Notification to property owners and when the last mailing
was done.
- Recommended addition of condition number 49: "Temporary
access/right-of-way shall be provided to the Bishop parcel,
and permanent access shall be provided and recorded with the
final map."
- Recommended addition of condition number 50: "All attempts
will be made to dedicate area sufficient to coincide with
the County's trail system, at the beginning of the terminus
to match as closely as possible with that trail system. A
final design and required dedication to be directed by the
Community Development Director and if he is unable to do it
then it shall come back to the Commission."
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24624 based on the Findings
and subject to the 48 Conditions of Approval listed in the
Staff Report with the following amendments:
Condition No. 4: "House plotting, architectural drawings,
floor plans, landscaping and fences/walls
shall require Minor Design Review
approval prior to issuance of building
permits. All standards of development
and procedural steps in effect at the
Minor Design Review submittal shall apply
for this project."
Condition No. 7: "Applicant shall submit and receive
approval of landscape and irrigation
plans for model homes (if such are
AGENDA ITEM NO.
1-0
/7
PAGE IL OF -0
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 6
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24624 CONT
desired), back-up wall areas, street
trees and slope planting in accord with
the City Landscape Guidelines, prior to
issuance of building permit. At least
one (1) model home to include a Xeriscape
landscaping theme."
Condition No. 16.d: "Native plant material shall be used for
re -landscaping of cut and fill slopes.
Slope and erosion control plans shall be
submitted and approved prior to the
issuance of grading permit."
Condition No. 16.e: "The fresh water willow pond located on
the southern corner of the proposed park
shall be set aside and protected from
intrusion from the local mining
operation. A single coast live oak
overlooking the pond shall also be
preserved if possible, if not replace at
a ratio of 10:1 with two year growth
trees, 20:1 at one year and 30:1 if less
than one year mature.
Condition No. 30: "I" Street from Grand Avenue to northerly
tract boundary shall have an 80 foot
right-of-way with 64 foot curb -to -curb, a
landscaped median, a 6 foot parkway on
the west side and a 10 foot parkway on
the east side. The east side parkway
shall have a 6 foot sidewalk the entire
length and the west side parkway shall
have a 6 foot sidewalk from Grand Avenue
to the first street north of "I -I"
Court."
Condition No. 34: "I" Street from Grand Avenue to "F" Court
shall have 80 foot right-of-way and 64
foot curb -to -curb. DELETE.
Condition No. 49: "Temporary access/right-of-way shall be
provided to the Bishop parcel, and
permanent access shall be provided and
recorded with the final map."
Condition No. 50: "All attempts will be made to dedicate
area sufficient to coincide with the
County's trail system, at the beginning
of the terminus to match as closely as
possible with that trail system. A final
design and required dedication to be
directed by the Community Development
Director and if he is unable to do it
then it shall come back to the
Commission.,'
Second by Chairman Brown with consideration by the table on
addition of condition number 51, which will read:
Condition No. 51: "City to draft a reimbursement agreement
for the oversizing of "I" Street.
Commissioner Saathoff amended his motion to include the
addition of condition number 51.
Approved 4-0
At this time, 8:30 p.m., the Planning Commission recessed.
At this time, 8:42 p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF /��
Fd
PLANNING DIVISION
REPaT TO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Public Hearing
TTM 24624
January 17, 1990
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
Gary Thornhill Dave underman
Planning Manager Coma. Dev. Dir.
OWNER/APPLICANT
Centex Homes
3190 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, California 92507
REQUESTED USE
To subdivide 203.4 acres into 589 single-family lots.
SIZE AND LOCATION
203.4 acres of land generally located south of the extension of
Mountain Avenue and west of the terminus of Broadway Avenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
BACKGROUND
An application for a General Plan Amendment was approved by the City
Council on December 12, 1989, for the subject site. The General
Plan designation was changed from Specific Plan and Floodway/Flood-
plain to Low Density Residential. The applicants have also filed an
application for a Tentative Map (TM 25347) for the subdivision of
833.3 acres into four (4) lots for financing and conveyance
proposes; the subject site is one of the four (4) lots considered
under this (TM 25347) request: The Planning Commission, on December
20, 1989, recommended approval of TM 25347.
This request involves one of ,the properties located within the West
Lake Elsinore Assessment District. Environmental Impact Report
(E.I.R.) 88-2 was prepared for,the Assessment District and specific
development proposals within t46 district boundaries; the report
analyzes the impacts associated with the formation of the district
and the resultant improvements; the annexation of an "island" area
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OFE
EXISTING
ZONING
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE
Project Site -
Vacant
R-1
Low Density
Residential
North -
Vacant
R-1
Low Density
Residential
East -
Single -Family
R-1
Low Density
Residential
Residential
South -
Single -Family
R-1
Low Density
Residential
Residential
West -
Single -Family,_
R-1
Low Density
Residential
Residential
BACKGROUND
An application for a General Plan Amendment was approved by the City
Council on December 12, 1989, for the subject site. The General
Plan designation was changed from Specific Plan and Floodway/Flood-
plain to Low Density Residential. The applicants have also filed an
application for a Tentative Map (TM 25347) for the subdivision of
833.3 acres into four (4) lots for financing and conveyance
proposes; the subject site is one of the four (4) lots considered
under this (TM 25347) request: The Planning Commission, on December
20, 1989, recommended approval of TM 25347.
This request involves one of ,the properties located within the West
Lake Elsinore Assessment District. Environmental Impact Report
(E.I.R.) 88-2 was prepared for,the Assessment District and specific
development proposals within t46 district boundaries; the report
analyzes the impacts associated with the formation of the district
and the resultant improvements; the annexation of an "island" area
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OFE
rid
Public Hearing
TTM 24624
January 17, 1990
Page 2
of the County into the City, and the specific project proposals
(Marinita, Ortega Partners, and Centex). The City Council certified
E.I.R. 88-2 on December 12, 1989. The Assessment District has been
reviewed by the Council but a final decision deferred until the
outcome of some of the associated residential projects has been
determined; the final assessment per unit will be affected by the
total number of residential lots within the district.
DISCUSSION
Staff and the applicants have had numerous meetings over the design
of the tract map and associated issues. Some of the concerns
expressed to the applicants by staff related to density, circulation
and road design issues, buffering of the site from adjacent lots,
and the dedication of land for park use.
In response to staff's concerns, the applicants have re -designed the
tract as follows:
1) The number of lots have been reduced from 618 to 589, a
reduction of 29 lots and the density has gone from 3.0
to 2.9 dwelling units/acre (d.u./acre).
2) Lincoln (north of Grand Avenue and indicated as "I"
Street on the map) has been extended to the northerly
border of the subdivision and re -designed from a two
lane (66 foot right-of-way) local road to a four lane
(75 foot right-of-way) arterial with bike lanes located
in the road.
3) The applicant proposes to dedicate approximately 4
acres of land (Lot "B") located just south of and
immediately adjacent to Terra Cotta Junior High School
for park related uses which will include a tot lot,
restrooms, storage, and parking to facilitate develop-
ment of the Terra Cotta School site. In addition, a
2.3 acre parcel (Lot "C") is proposed to be dedicated
to the City for open space.
The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan
and zoning requirements relative to density (0-6
d.u./acre). The proposed density of 2.9 d.u./acre is
less than Ortega partners (3.7) and slightly more than
Marinita (2.7).
The only other potential issue which staff has identified relates to
the 75% buffer requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Although the
present lot configuration generally conforms to this requirement,
there are a few lots located adjacent to Tract 18719 which, in the
strict application of the 75% requirement, do not comply. However,
it should be noted that the adjacent lots in this area (Forest View
and Vista Street) are larger than the majority of lots in Tract
18719 only because of a drainage course located to the rear of these
lots. The rest of the lots in this tract are in the 7,200 square
foot range and the overall tract density is 2.95 d.u./acre. Also,
Section 17.23.060 relating to the 75% buffer criteria allows for a
"case-by-case" review by the Planning Commission and City Council to
determine adequacy; it further states that: "it is the intent of
this paragraph to set a standard, but also to allow flexibility."
It is staff's opinion that, because the density is consistent with
the adjacent tract and there are unusual circumstances which
resulted in the creation of the larger parcels in this area, the
proposed project is consistent with the intent of the buffer
provision of the ordinance.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE,_ OF '
r r
Public Hearing
TTM 24624
January 17, 1990
Page 3
Therefore, it is staff's opinion that the proposed map design and
density is compatible with the surrounding residential development
in the area, is consistent with the City's Zoning and General Plan
Standards and will result in substantial overall area improvements
relative to drainage, traffic circulation, and parks and open space.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The anticipated environmental impacts of this proposed project were
addressed in EIR 88-2 which was certified by the City Council on
December 12, 1989. Environmental mitigation measures which are
specifically related to this Tentative Tract Map has been included
in the suggested Conditions of Approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 24624 based on the following
Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
1. The Tentative Tract Map complies with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's
Subdivision Standards and the State Subdivision Map Act.
3. Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 previously certified by the
City Council, has satisfactorily addressed anticipated
environmental impacts of this Tentative Tract Map.
4. The project, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing
and proposed development in the immediate area and will have
minimal adverse impacts on abutting properties.
5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map, as conditioned, includes a
number of public benefits, including drainage and flood control
improvements, a public park site, an open space dedication, a
bike trail and transportation and circulation improvements.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF1
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
F51 4 0 i .. § JZI
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON MOLENDYK, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988: ORTEGA PARTNERS
This item was continued from the City Council meeting of
February 27, 1990, in order for staff, the applicant,
selected members of the Council, and the neighborhood
representatives to meet and discuss various alternative site
plans.
The developer, at the direction of staff, developed several
scenarios for discussion purposes.
After evaluating the various alternatives and discussing them
with the neighborhood representatives and Councilmembers, the
following scenario emerged as the most feasible:
7,200 square foot minimum parcel sizes with the
large lot buffer along the southeasterly
boundary for a total of 259 lots. This
proposal would also include a small
(approximately one-half acre in size) pocket
park near the proposed fire station site.
Neighborhood representatives, although acknowledging movement
toward a resolution of the issue, could not assure that the
above approach would be acceptable. The developer is
continuing to review the issue, but doubts he is able to
reduce the number of lots further.
It is staff's opinion that the latest revision best addresses
the concerns of the residents and council relative to
compatibility with surrounding developments.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm
Environmental Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract
Map 23988 based on the findings and conditions listed in the
February 27, 1990 staff report to the City Council.
;ANDA ITEC' N- ��
' PAC*.LQ. OF51
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: Februaxy 27, 1990
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 23988: Ortega
Partners; a request of California
Communities for approval of a Tentative
Map to subdivide 72.48 acres into 259
single-family lots, located north-
westerly of Machado Street at the
terminus of Lincoln Street.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY
Galy Thornhill Dave nderman
Planning Manage / U Cc Dev. Dir.
APPROVED BY:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
The Planning Commission on February 7, 1990, unanimously
(Commissioner Wilsey excused himself) recommended approval of
the request. This particular map had been previously
continued for a number of meetings in order for staff and the
developer to address several issues of concern. The
Commission recommended adoption of Condition Number 18
relating to the trail dedication and design standards and
Condition Number 48 relating to the requirement for a stop
sign at the Timey and Coplasa Street intersection (off-site).
The City Council, on December 12, 1989 approved a General
Plan change from Specific Plan/Floodway/Floodplain to Low
Density Residential and a pre -zone to R-1 (Low Density
Residential). This project is also part of the proposed West
Lake Elsinore Assessment District.
The map before the Council represents the latest of several
revisions which were done to address the concerns of the
neighborhood residents and the Planning Commission relative
to the issues of density, lot sizes (including perimeter
buffering), circulation, and drainage.
In order to better address these concerns, the Planning
Commission directed staff, the developer, and a designated
representative from the neighborhood to meet and attempt to
resolve some of the issues. The resulting plan is one that
differs from the original proposal as follows:
1. The number of lots has been decreased from 283
to 259.
The density has been reduced from 3.9 to 3.57
dwelling units per acre (d.u./ac.).
Terra Cotta has been redesigned to reduce
straight sections in order to mitigate traffic
speeds.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3a
PAGE OF
Page 2
February 27, 1990
Subject: Tentative Tract Map 23988
Ortega Partners
4. Parcel sizes along the southerly and easterly
boundaries have been increased to half acre
minimum to provide for buffering.
5. There is an improved transition from the larger
perimeter lots to the smaller internal lots.
6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide all-putpose
recreation trail, connecting with the Premier
and Marinita Tracts, has been provided along
the southerly and easterly boundary.
Despite the numerous revisions to the project, many of the
residents still have concerns over the minimum parcel size of
6,000 square feet (they would prefer 7,200) and the density
(3.57 units per acre). While staff is sensitive to these
concerns, the project is consistent with the ordinance and
General Plan requirements relative to density and minimum
parcel size. Moreover, the average parcel size for this tract
is approximately 8,854 square feet and the perimeter lots,
with a few exceptions, are well in excess of 7,200 square
feet. The proposed project density of 3.57 d.u./ac. (which
directly relates to lot size and number) is, in staff's
opinion, consistent and compatible with, the density of
existing and proposed surrounding projects (which generally
range from 2.7 to 3.7 dwelling units per acre).
Environmental concerns for this project have been addressed
in Environmental Impact Report 88-2.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council re -affirm Environmental
Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract Map 23988
based on the findings listed, and subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings:
1. The Tentative Tract complies with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan and R-1 zoning standards.
2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's
subdivision standards and State Subdivision Map Act.
3. The project, as conditioned, will be compatible with
existing and proposed development in the immediate area
and will have minimal adverse impacts on abutting
properties.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3J
PAGE dqOF 3/
r r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988
Planning Division
1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 is approved subject to the approval
of General Plan Amendment 89-5, Pre -Zone 89-5 and Annexation
No. 47.
2. Tentative Tract Map 23988 shall expire two (2) years after
City Council approval date, unless extended as provided by
the State of California Subdivision Map Act.
3. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots
shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
4. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project prohibiting
on -street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers and trucks
over one (1) ton capacity. CC & R's shall also include
screening any ground base disk and no roof -mounted or front
yard disk shall be allowed. CC & R's shall be subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or designee,
prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC & R's
shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of
Occupancy for the units when developed in the future.
5. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans, land-
scaping and fences/walls shall require Minor Design Review
approval prior to issuance of building permits. All standards
of development and procedural steps in effect at the Minor
Design Review submittal shall apply for this project.
6. A combination of walls and/or fences shall be constructed
around the perimeter of the subdivision and adjacent to the
McVicker Canyon Flood Control Channel. Precise design
materials and location to be determined through Minor Design
Review process.
7. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of
utilities.
8. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit,
subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of
Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department.
9. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of landscape and
irrigation plans for model homes (if such are desired), back
up wall areas, street trees and slope planting in accord with
the City Landscape Guidelines, prior to issuance of building
permits.
10. Signage for this subdivision shall require City Permits.
11. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage
shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval
prior to installation.
12. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the
Planning Department.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, subdivider shall
provide assurance that all required fees have been paid to
the Lake Elsinore Unified School District.
14. Comply with all conditions of the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District.
15. Prior to approval of a Final Tract Map by the City Council,
all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the mini-
mum dimensional standards of the R-1 zoning district.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 3 OF�
r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988
16. On the final grading plan, the subdivider shall indicate that
single-family dwelling units can be sited on lots 35, 36, 37,
38, 100 and 101 without the need for a variance.
17. The subdivider shall work with the City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division, Engineering Division and Community
Services Department to secure Riverside County Flood Control
District approval for use of the McVicker Canyon Flood
Control Channel as a public trail.
18 Subdivider shall provide a 25 foot multi-purpose recreation
trail identified as Lots "C", "D" and "Ell, Design and
improvements, subject to the approval of the Community
Services Director, shall include:
a. Proper grading for drainage.
b. Finish grade to be hydroseeded with low maintenance
natural vegetation to prevent erosion.
C. Trail to be improved to 5 foot wide with a D/G
Surface, consistent with City General Plan, as
amended December 10, 1985.
d. The dedicated parcels, Lots "C", "D" and "E", will
be incorporated with the City's Lighting and
LandscapeMaintenanceDistrict.
e. Easements for trail access need to be provided
adjacent to Lot "A" from Lot "E" to Terra Cotta
Street along property boundaries of Lots 41 and 255.
This condition to sunset if flood control easement
is approved by Flood Control District for public
trail usage.
19. Application for annexation to the City's Landscaping and
Lighting District is required prior to approval of a Final
Tract Map.
20. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire
Department.
21. Comply with applicable environmental mitigation measures con-
tained in EIR 88-2, including:
a. Architectural standards shall be implemented to uti-
lize building materials and site designs that mini-
mize interior noise intrusion and provide exterior
noise - sheltered environments.
b. The proposed project shall be consistent with all
applicable criteria outlined in the General Plan,
grading standards identified in Ordinance 772.
C. Grading plans shall preserve significant vegetation
stands.
d. Use native plant material for re -landscaping.
e. Prior to issuance of grading permits, soil sampling
and testing shall be conducted on any agricultural
portions of the site to test for residues of pesti-
cides, herbicides and/or fungicides.
f. Should a City-wide or area -wide fee program be
adopted by the City for increase in police services,
this project should be required to participate along
with other developments.
AGENDA ITEM NO..
PACE OF SI
rd -
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
Engineering Division
rd
TRACT MAP 23988 - CONTINUED
22. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code prior to final map approval.
23. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030, if owned by applicant or
landowner. Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
24. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34, Resolution No.- 85-26).
25. Submit a "Will -serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water agency, stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project.
Submit this letter prior to final map approval.
26. Construct all public works improvements per approved street
plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and
signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
27. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared
by a civil engineer. Improvements shall be designed and
constructed to Riverside County Road Standards, latest
edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04
and 16.34).
28. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12,
Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78).
29. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument
certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11"
mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department
before final inspection of off-site improvements will be
scheduled and approved.
30. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by
Riverside County Fire protection.
31. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on
street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer.
32. Lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage
acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
33. Contribute $708.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign
Program.
34. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello Roos
Community Facilities District (CFD) for infrastructure
improvements and operation and maintenance for the West
Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement District. No Certificate
of Occupancy will be issued for lots sold until the West
Elsinore Improvement District has been formed. As a
participant in the West Lake Elsinore Infrastructure
Improvement District, it is understood that a Development
Agreement and a Funding/Acquisition Agreement is being
drafted and should be executed by the City and property owner
prior to the property owner vote that approves the special
taxes to be levied by the District.
35. Applicant shall obtain all necessary easements for off-site
grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map
approval.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE �5'OF 5I
r
r
OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 = CONTINUED
36. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for
construction of public works improvements and post
appropriate bonds.
37. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall be submitted, reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer and Riverside County Flood
Control District prior to final map approval.
38. All major drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District
standard and agreement entered into with the District for
construction, ownership and maintenance.
39. Developer shall meet all conditions of Riverside County Flood
Control District for development of this site.
40. All easements on the map shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
41. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street
design recommendations. Provide final Soils Report showing
compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification.
42. No lot shall ingress or egress to Lincoln Street.
43. Lincoln Street off-site shall be improved to provide 2 lanes
of travel (25 foot curb -to -curb) from existing improvements
to easterly tract boundary.
44. All storm facilities shall provide tract and downstream
property owners with 100 year storm flood protection and be
approved by Riverside County Flood Control District.
45. Streets "E", "I", "J" and "L" shall have 40 feet width
curb -to -curb.
46. Provide a crossing at Mc Vicker Canyon Channel for the
pedestrian/recreation trail.
47. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by developer
per City Standards, tapes to be provided prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy.
48. Install stop sign on Timey Street at Coplasa Street prior to
first Certificate of Occupancy.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE 47 OF�
r
OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING
HELDXOFALL
7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 90
THE CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:02 P.M.
PLEIANCE was led by Commissioner Saat ff.
ROLL CALL•
PRESENT: Commission s: Gilenson, Brin y, Saathoff, Wilsey and
Brown
ABSENT: Commissioners: one
Also present were Commun Development Director Gunderman,
Planning Manager Thornhill, s ciate Planner Restivo, Assistant
Planner Fairbanks and Sen' Civi Engineer O'Donnell.
MINUTE ACTION
Motion by Comm' sioner Saathoff to app ve Minutes of January 17,
1990, as submi ed, second by Commissioner ilsey.
ApprovZ4-(Commissioner Brinley abstainin
PUBLICTS
Th e being no requests to speak, Chairman Brown clo d the PUBLIC
MMENTS section.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners (Continued from
January 17, 1990) - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a
request to subdivide 72.5 acres into 259 lots, located
northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus of Lincoln
Street. Environmental Impact Report 88-2, previously
certified by City Council, addresses the anticipated environ-
mental impacts of this project.
Planning Manager Thornhill requested the following amendments
to the Conditions of Approval:
Condition No. 18: "Subdivider shall provide a 25 foot multi-
purpose recreation trail identified as
Lots "C", "D" and "E". Design and
improvements, subject to the approval of
the Community Services Director, shall
include:
a) Proper grading for drainage.
b) Finish grade to be hydroseeded with
low maintenance natural vegetation to
prevent erosion.
c) Trail to be improved to 5 foot wide
with a D/G Surface, consistent with
City General Plan, as amended
December 10, 1985.
d) The dedicated parcels, Lots "C", "D"
and "E", will be incorporated with
the City's Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District.
e) Easements for trail access need to be
provided adjacent to Lot "A" from Lot
"E" to Terra Cotta Street along pro-
perty boundaries of Lots 41 and 255.
This condition to sunset if flood
control easement is approved by Flood
Control District for public trail
usage."
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF ` /
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 7, 1990
Page 2
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 CONTINUED
Condition No. 48: "Install stop sign on Timey Street at
Coplasa Street prior to first Certificate
of Occupancy."
Commissioner Wilsey asked to be excused, due to possible
conflict of interest.
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing'at 7:09 p.m. asking
if anyone wished to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map
23988.
Mr. Jeff Kenyon, Senior Project Manager for California
Communities, gave a brief overview on the proposal and the
changes that have taken place.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor
of Tentative Tract Map 23988. Receiving no response, Chairman
Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition.
Mr. Scott Josefsen, property owners' representative for the
west end, stated that they (the residents) are still concerned
with the following: density; incompatibility with existing lot
sizes in the area; traffic impacts; need for sidewalks and
street lights; public safety, and presented a petition with
200 signatures.
The following persons expressed concern on Tentative Tract Map
23988 as follows: density; traffic circulation; the need for a
stop sign at Princo and a signal at Lincoln and Machado.
Mark Soderburg, 15058 Heather Lane;
Alvie Baker, 30580 Coplas Street
Rosemary Connelly, 30516 Princo Street;
Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln Street
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in
opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if
anyone wished to speak on the matter.
The Secretary stated that written communication was received
from Mr. Earl Doyle, 32173 Michele Drive, and a petition from
the Laurel Point residents, 97 signatures, expressing concern
on density.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak on the
matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the
public hearing at 7:31 p.m.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on lot sizes, and the stop
sign at Princo.
Commissioner Brinley commented on the density and lot sizes.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 4,
pertaining to CC & R's, asking if there will be a homeowner's
association to enforce the CC & R's, or will this be signed
over to the City for enforcement? ,
Planning Manager Thornhill responded that the City currently
does not enforce CC & R's, and a homeowner's association is
not anticipated.
Chairman Brown commented on the traffic signal at Lincoln and
Machado.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 02
PAGE 9 OF SL
C r
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 7, 1990
Page 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 CONTINUED
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map 23988 based on the Findings
listed in the Staff Report and subject to the 47 Conditions of
Approval with the following amendments:
Condition No. 18: "Subdivider shall provide a 25 foot multi-
purpose recreation trail identified as
Lots "C", "D" and -.."E". Design and
improvements, subject to the approval of
the Community Services Director, shall
include:
a) Proper grading for drainage.
b) Finish grade to be hydroseeded with
low maintenance natural vegetation to
prevent erosion.
c) Trail to be improved to 5 foot wide
with a D/G Surface, consistent with
City General Plan, as amended
December 10, 1985.
d) The dedicated parcels, Lots "C", "D"
and "E", will be incorporated with
the City's Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District.
e) Easements for trail access need to be
provided adjacent to Lot "A" from Lot
"E" to Terra Cotta Street along pro-
perty boundaries of Lots 41 and 255.
This condition to sunset if flood
control easement is approved by Flood
Control District for public trail
usage."
Condition No. 48: "Install stop sign on Timey Street at
Coplasa Street prior to first Certificate
of occupancy."
Second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0
Commissioner Wilsey returned to the table.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25274 - Pardee Construct'
C ny (Continued from January 17, 1990) - Chairma rown
state at there has been a request to Conti his item
indefinite nd called for a motion.
Motion by Commissi ner Brinley continue indefinitely
Vesting Tentative Tract 25 second by Commissioner
Gilenson.
Approved 5-0
3. Tentative Tract ap 24490 - Jones & Tomii-_ - Chairmin Brown
stated that re has been a request to contin this tem to
March 7, 0, and called for a motion.
Mot' by Commissioner Brinley to continue Tentative Tra Map
2 90 to March 7, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
oproved 5-0
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE 1._ OF 15-I
This matter was continued from the meeting of January 3rd.
At that meeting, the Commission directed the applicant to
meet with a representative of the property owners to resolve
issues relating to density, lot buffering, drainage, and
traffic circulation issues. Since the January 3rd meeting,
staff, a member of the Planning Commission, and the homeowner
representative have met twice to discuss the above mentioned
issues. As a result of these meetings, the following project
revisions have been incorporated into the project design:
1. Perimeter Buffering
All of the lots
subject site are in
better transition
smaller lots.
2. Density
3.
along the southerly boundary of the
excess of 1/2 acre. Also, there is a
from the large lots northerly to the
The number of lots have been reduced from 283 to 259, a
reduction of 24 lots. This translates to a decrease in
density from 3.9 to 3.57.
Circulation
There have been no changes in the circulation system
since those shown on the exhibit presented to the
Commission at the January 3rd meeting. Staff is
satisfied that the most recent circulation design
provides the most efficient traffic circulation, given
the design constraints of the property.
Based on the latest revision to the map, it is staff's
opinion that the proposed project complies with the buffering
requirement and that the proposed density is compatible with
surrounding developments.
This project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the
West Lake Elsinore E.I.R. (88-2).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to
the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 23988, based
on the Findings contained in the November 29, 1989 Staff
Report and the attached Conditions of Approval.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE to OF SI
!OR NDUM
TO
Planning Commission
FROM:
Gary Thornhill, Planning
Manager
DATE:
February 7, 1990
22:.0 . ..
This matter was continued from the meeting of January 3rd.
At that meeting, the Commission directed the applicant to
meet with a representative of the property owners to resolve
issues relating to density, lot buffering, drainage, and
traffic circulation issues. Since the January 3rd meeting,
staff, a member of the Planning Commission, and the homeowner
representative have met twice to discuss the above mentioned
issues. As a result of these meetings, the following project
revisions have been incorporated into the project design:
1. Perimeter Buffering
All of the lots
subject site are in
better transition
smaller lots.
2. Density
3.
along the southerly boundary of the
excess of 1/2 acre. Also, there is a
from the large lots northerly to the
The number of lots have been reduced from 283 to 259, a
reduction of 24 lots. This translates to a decrease in
density from 3.9 to 3.57.
Circulation
There have been no changes in the circulation system
since those shown on the exhibit presented to the
Commission at the January 3rd meeting. Staff is
satisfied that the most recent circulation design
provides the most efficient traffic circulation, given
the design constraints of the property.
Based on the latest revision to the map, it is staff's
opinion that the proposed project complies with the buffering
requirement and that the proposed density is compatible with
surrounding developments.
This project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the
West Lake Elsinore E.I.R. (88-2).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to
the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 23988, based
on the Findings contained in the November 29, 1989 Staff
Report and the attached Conditions of Approval.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE to OF SI
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 2
ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 89-3 CONTI
plicant requested fewer parking spaces based on the number
e
10 s,
work hours, etc. The applicant retains the buil ng
an\here
tantially increases his work force or changes h Urs
If is no restriction on the number of emp/tat
the
hooperation, how would you monitor this?
Coy Development Director Gunderman respondhere
are two 'ways: 1) During the Design Review _proceould
request o the Commission a continuous six month the
project tonsure compliance; 2) Periodic inspectough
code enforcement.
Commissioner ikaa*
difficult to impl
City. If this ids,
ever six months o:
that parking spat
put the burden on
included whether
basis.
hoff responded that this
ment, and puts a substantial
done then the applicant sho
annually, something to su s
s�equired originally are st
th applicant not the City.
it\ be in the amendment or
feasible but
burden on the
Id initiate, once
tantiate the fact
ill adequate, and
This should be
on a case-by-case
Community Development ftre/upports
rman responded that the
intent was for a case -by -c' sther than including it
in the ordinance.
Chairman Brown stated that hame concerns. Suggested
that number 2.b. be amended n initial parking study
and an annual review whis the findings that the
number of parking spaces aceded £or a development
and/or use is less than thaty the Code."
Commissioner SaatX--by
ated that there may be certain
situations where thnot be\aneed for an annual
report. On a case basiscould require more
frequent reports orquent repoCommissioner Saathented on n2.g. with regard to
an applicant requesced parking spac�s and increasing
the size of the bui
Chairman Brown tated that he would like thio go back for
further review. The parking issue will ave to be
addressed --you may not have to improve the ..other area which
would otherwi be dedicated for parking, but you ave to go
ahead and edicate enough area on the plot plan to meet the
original co e.
Discussio ensued on whether or not the convertible area could
he utili ed for storage; parking spaces to be provided sat that
they n with the building if the use should chan` and
addit' nal parking is required; continuing the proposal for
furt r review.
Mo on by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Zone Code Amend en
8 -3 to a future meeting, second by Commissioner Wilsey.
A proved 4-0
2. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners - Chairman Brown
stated that staff has requested that this item be continued to
February 7, 1990, and asked if there were any comments from.the
table.
Community Development Director Gunderman gave a brief overview
on the meeting of January 10th between the applicant, property
owners' representative and staff.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
FAC // OF ✓
r C
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 17, 1990
Page 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 CONTINUED
At this time, 7:23 p.m., Commissioner Wilsey left the table.
Chairman Brown asked if the proposal was on schedule for the
meeting of the 7th.
Planning Manager Thornhill stated that this depends on whethep
or not we can get together with the applicant and the property
owners' representative again prior to the next meeting. There
is a meeting tentatively scheduled for Monday, January 22,
1990.
Chairman Brown informed the people in the audience present for
this item, that staff has recommended this item be continued to
February 7th with a possibility that it could be continued
again.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract Map
23988 to February 7, 1990, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 3-0 (Commissioner Wilsey absent from the table)
3. Tentative Parcel Map 25157 - Bainbridge Investment, Inc.
C firman Brown stated that staff has requested that this i em
be continued to February 21, 1990, and asked if ther was
anyone in the audience here for this item. Receivi no
response, Chairman Brown called for a motion.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tent e Parcel
Map 25157, to February 21, 1990, second by C mmissioner
Gilenson. \
Approved 3-0�%Commissioner Wilsey absent from Vdtbthe
le)
At this time, 7:26Pllm., Commissioner Wilsey retur table.
4. Tentative Tract )4ap 24624 - Centex Homes - Planning Manager
Thornhill presented Na proposal to subdivid 203.4 acres into
589 single-family lots, generally 1 ated south of the
extension of Mountain venue and west/
est of the terminus -of
Broadway Avenue.
Anticipated environmentaal3mpaq/t
mpact for this proposal are
addressed by EnvironmentReport 88-2 which was
certified by the City Counn cember 12, 1989.
Planning Manager Thornhill stated that the Engineering
Department has requested that on 'tion number 34 be deleted,
and condition number 30 amengbd to ead, as follows:
Condition No. 30: "I" treet from\foot
venue to northerly
tra boundaryhave an 80 foot
ri t -of -way wioot curb -to -curb, a
ndscaped mediafoot parkway on the
est side andfoot parkway on the
east side. The e parkway shall
have a 6 foot he entire length
and the west siday hall have a 6
foot sidewalk rand Avenue to the
first street norI-I" urt."
Chairman Brxwn opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. asking if
anyone wi ed to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map 24624.
Mr. Mik Aller, Centex Homes, stated that they agree wi h the
condi ons of approval; however, has not had an opportunit to
revi the revised condition on the roadway width, and w ld
lik to request that staff work with us regarding reimburseme t
f that portion of the design that is over the needs of thi
evelopment.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE / Z OF 51
r
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DAVE GUNDERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1990
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 - ORTEGA PARTNERS
This
This proposed subdivision was continued from the January 3rd
Planning Commission meeting to allow additional time to
resolve several issues raised by surrounding property owners.
These issues include perimeter buffering and lot sizes on the
outside boundary of the subdivision, overall density of the
project, expected traffic generation and circulation impacts
on surrounding streets, drainage and related issues. The
Commission directed that a property owner representative be
appointed and meet with the project subdivider to resolve as
many issues as possible prior to the Commission reconsidering
this item.
A meeting was held in City Hall on January 10th, with the
subdivider, his engineer and Mr. Scot Jose£sen present,
representing the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner
Gilenson and members of the City Staff were also present.
The following topics were discussed at the meeting.
1. PERIMETER
The subdivider agreed to adjust the lot sizes on the
southerly perimeter of the subdivision so that there would be
a consistent lfband" of approximately one-half acre lots
adjacent to properties south of the the tentative tract. He
will also explore the concept of transitioning lot sizes from
larger to smaller toward the interior of the tract.
2. DENSITY
Densities of surrounding projects were reviewed and it was
noted that the number of dwellings per acre will change if
lot sizes are adjusted due to perimeter buffering.
3. CIRCULATION
The subdivider directed his engineer to prepare a circulation
study for the next Commission meeting indicating how
vehicular traffic would be expected to exit the tract.
Concerns were raised regarding traffic on Timey and Princo
Streets.
A. OVERALL TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
The subdivider indicated that his company intends to
construct move -up type housing on the proposed lots which
could sell for in excess of $200,000. Precise house sizes
and elevations will still be subject to Design Review by the
Planning Commission.
5. DRAINAGE
Mr. Josefsen said he was satisfied with the discussion
regarding drainage at the last Commission meeting.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 a
PAGE /3 OF `'/
C
Page 2
Memorandum to Planning Commission
Subject: Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners
6. OTHER ISSUES
Concerns were raised regarding the treatment of perimeter
walls and fencing, especially on the southerly edge of the
subdivision, and the potential for view intrusion between
houses within the Ortega Partner's subdivision and adjoining
lots. It is suggested that these be resolved via the Design
Review process.
In as much as the subdivider will need to redesign a portion
of the tentative tract map and that another meeting with the
neighborhood representative will be scheduled, it is
recommended that proposed Tentative Tract Map 23988 be
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 7,
1990.
AGENDA ITEM�NO. 3
PACE /_ / OF 57
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 3, 1990
Page 5
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 89-20 AND 89-21 CONTINUED
Cndition 15: "Walls shall be constructed along the side
and rear property lines and shall conform
to Section 17.14.080 (Fences and WallF),
subject to the approval of the Commu ity
Development Director or his designee.
second b Commissioner Wilsey.
Approved 5,0
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Residentyal Project
89-21 basedo theFindings and subject to the 35 C ditions of
Approval 1 is edin the Staff Report with �e following
amendments:
Condition 13.a.1 "All landscape improvements to be bonded
120% Faithful Performance/ Bond, and re-
leased at completion /of installation of
andscape requirements approval/ac-
eptance, and bond 100% for materials and
1 or for one year."
Condition 15: "Wa s shall be constructed along the side
andar propertyj'lines and shall conform
to SKPtion 17.,X4.080 (Fences and Walls),
subjec to theApproval of the Community
Developn*nt D' ector or his designee."
second by Commissioner Gilens
Approved 5-0
AT THIS TIME, 7:55 P.M., THE PLA,pQNING C'QMMISSION RECESSED.
AT THIS TIME, 8:09 P.M., THE P W NING COXMISSION RECONVENED.
7. Determination of Substantial Conform nce with General Plan -
Riverside County - Community Developme t Director Gunderman
stated that staff requests that this it be continued to the
meeting of January 1,7, 1990.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to contin this item to the
meeting of January 17, 1990, second by Commi ioner Gilenson.
Approved 5-0
PUBLIC HEARINGS ,
IT WAS THE CO SENSUS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
HEARING #2 PRIOR TO #1.
2. Deveralled
ent Agreement - Brighton Homes - Chairman Bro
thatff has requested this item be removed from the
and for a motion.
Mo ion by Commissioner Saathoff to remove the Deve
reement for Brighton Homes from the agenda, sec
'Commissioner Wilsey.
Approved 5-0
PUBLIC
stated
R
1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners (Continued from
December 20, 1989) - Planning Manager Thornhill stated that the
applicant submitted a revised Tentative Tract Map on December
14, 1989, in an attempt to address the previously expressed
concerns of the Planning Commission and adjacent property
AGENDA ITEM NO. -.2L
PACE �`S OF
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 3, 1990
Page 8
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 _ ORTEGA PARTNERS CONTINUED
Mr. Michael Hunt, Pacific Coast Engineering, commented on
concerns raised, as follows:
- Significant slopes and the rear property lines;
- Density consistency with surrounding approved tracts,
Premier tract to the north approved at 3:6, Art Nelson's
tract to the southeast approved at 3.94, Marinita tract was
approved at 2.8, Tomich tract, which is to the west of the
Premier tract, was approved at 3.6, and the density we
propose right now is 3.7 dwelling units per acre;
"J" Street knuckle --the double cul-de-sac was created to
deter traffic movement to Princo. The cul-de-sac to the
west could be extended through, similar to the way the old
map was and that knuckle could be replaced in order to
negate or address the concern of traffic storage, volume and
quick right/left turn movements onto Princo;
- Drainage, believes that this has been adequately addressed.
The assessment district is planning on putting in that
trapezoidal channel down to Machado up into the McVickers
Canyon with a debris basin which becomes a dam, and acts as
a retention basin of 40 foot.
The in tract drainage has been setup so that we actually
divert water, that historically went to the area to the
south, into the channel. We have proposed a storm drain
line on that plan that goes all the way to the westerly
tract boundary.
- Traffic on Alvarado, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
addresses the traffic for the overall area. As far as the
in tract circulation, we have added extra turn movements to
deter people from driving suddenly to Princo and to Timey
Street and, as stated by Mr. Kenyon, if it comes down to
closing off Timey Street we are not opposed to that.
However, would like to point out that we do need two (2)
points of fire access and this would create a problem if we
were to close Timey. The access onto Princo was approved
via the Marinita Tract.
- Green Belt, we have proposed a 95 foot strip along the
easterly and southerly boundary that would act as a green
belt and has access for both equestrian and pedestrian
traffic. Believes that Commissioner Wilsey, at the last
meeting, suggested that this be called a recreational public
access as opposed to an equestrian access.
- School issues - Mr. Kenyon needs to address this issue.
- Equestrian issue was addressed with a 25 foot strip.
- Lot "A", being the flood control area. Mr. Kenyon contacted
the title company to get an opinion of who actually owned
that area, and all of the information that we have at this
time is, that is owned and was dedicated under Map 19402-1
to the City for flood control purposes.
Commissioner Saathoff requested that Mr. Mandrell comment
briefly on the West End Assessment District.
Mr. Mandrell stated that the key issue on the West End District
was the drainage problem, and specifically the major drainage
AGENDA ITEM NO. --2L(L`
FAGS /* OF 31
r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 3, 1990
Page 6
ATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 - ORTEGA PARTNERS CONTINUED
owners. The revised map differs from the previous map as
follows:
1. The number of lots has decreased from 283 to 266, a
difference of seventeen (17) lots.
2. The density has decreased from 3.9 dwelling units per acre
to 3.7 dwelling units per acre.
3. Terra Cotta has been redesigned tc reduce straight
sections near the southwesterly corner of the property.
This was done to address concerns over traffic speeds and
to limit access southerly to the adjacent neighborhood.
4. Parcel sizes along the southerly and easterly boundaries
have been substantially increased and are more consistent
with the 75% ordinance criteria; the parcels range from
approximately 66% to 108% of adjacent parcels, except for
lots located adjacent to the Flood Control District
property and the Wilsey property.
5. Lots 151-155 (which are now re -numbered as lots 168, 169,
170, and 205) have been re -configured to reduce traffic
conflicts; these lots no longer take access off of Terra
Cotta.
Commissioner Wilsey asked to be excused due to possible
conflict of interest.
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. asking if
anyone wished to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map 23988.
Mr. Jeff Kenyon, Senior Project Manager with California
Communities, stated that he agrees with Mr. Thornhill's
analysis, and would like to emphasize that substantial changes
have been made that do benefit the community and the map.
Mr. Kenyon then stated that there were some minor changes
requested on November 29, 1989, concerning some of the
Conditions of Approval and though Mr. Thornhill was going to
read them into the record.
Planning Manager Thornhill stated that he believes the changes
can be discussed at the time the Conditions of Approval are
discussed.
Mr. Kenyon stated they have had their civil engineer, Michael
Hunt, work closely with staff and believes the concerns of the
Commission have been improved, accomplished or mitigated. Mr.
Hunt has also met with some of the homeowners.
Mr. Kenyon stated that one concern that may not have been
addressed by staff or brought up previously is, the type and
size of house that is anticipated for construction. We are
talking about housing that will be, rough approximation,
1,800-1,900 square feet up to 2,400-2,500 square feet, possibly
even larger.
Mr. Kenyon stated that he would like to have Mr. Michael Hunt,
answer any technical questions concerning the changes that have
been made, and would like to reserve the right to address the
Commission later on if need be.
Mr. Michael Hunt, Pacific Coast Engineering, representing
Ortega Partners and California Communities, stated that he
would answer any questions that may arise.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PACE I6 OF -,r/
r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 3, 1990
Page 7
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 _ ORTEGA PARTNERS CONTINUED
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
Tentative Tract Map 23988.
Mr. John Mandrell, Keith Companies Butterfield Office, stated
that they have been working with eight (8) property owners, of
which this is one, over the past two (2) years in an effort to
form the West Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District
(CFD), which will provide certain infrastructure to serve this
area. The map before you has 266 lots, this is slightly less
than was originally anticipated. From an overall district
standpoint we are very interested in the final unit count,
because the cost has escalated beyond what was originally
anticipated. If there are any questions from the standpoint of
the CFD, I will try to answer them.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
Tentative Tract Map 23988. Receiving no response, Chairman
Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition.
The following persons expressed concern on Tentative Tract Map
23988 as follows: design and layout of tract; excessive slopes,
landscaping and fencing; density; configuration of the knuckle
on "J" Street which turns into Princo Street, and Princo should
be a dead end street; drainage/flooding in the area; traffic
impacts on Alvarado, Princo and Timey Streets and public safety
in the area; two-story homes should be changed to single -story
ranch homes which would be conducive with existing; a green
belt should be provided; Timey Street should be closed;
recreational trail; impact on schools; Lot "A" bordering the
small lots being undeveloped City property.
Scott Josefsen, 15070 Alvarado Street;
Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln Street;
George Pratt, 15058 Christina Court;
Rosemary Connelly, 30516 Princo Street;
Edward Kane, 15431 Alvarado Street;
James Brown, 30537 Princo Street; --
Peggy McCormack, 30560 Timey Street;
Teri Ducar, 30520 Timey Street;
Mark Hollingsworth, 15161 Alvarado Street;
Dan Grimes, 15371 Alvarado Street;
Betty Ballewski, 15750 Alvarado Street;
Richard Baine, 30521 Timey Street;
Ed Stewart, 2157 Calle Alverte, San Juan Capistrano;
Alvie Baker, 30580 Coplas Street;
Si Carnagey, 30536 Princo Street
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in
opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if
anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response,
Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 8:58 p.m.
Chairman Brown commented on the following concerns brought up:
density, slopes, flooding/drainage, issues on Lot "A", and
mitigation measures to resolve these concerns being placed on
the proposal as conditions of approval which the applicant must
meet.
Mr. Kenyon commented on the following concerns brought up:
consistency of density and the 75 percent ordinance require-
ment; traffic concerns in the area particularly with Timey and
Princo--if staff recommends that Timey Street be closed would
not be opposed to this closing, and the extension of Princo has
already been approved via the Marinita Tract.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 32
PAGE /7 OF S7
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
January 3, 1990
Page 9
TRACT MAP 23988 - ORTEGA PARTNERS CONTINUED
facilities to serve the west end of lake. This consisted of,
as it relates to this project, the diagonal channel that
travels through the site. The West End Assessment District
proposes to build two (2) major facilities:
1) This facility from Machado up to McVickers Canyon along
with the necessary debris basin in McVicker Canyon;
2) Line "C", which is called out on the West Lake Elsinore
Master Plan of Drainage which goes from the Lake up to
Rice Canyon.
Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table.
Commissioner Brinley commented on density, drainage/flooding
and traffic concerns in the area, continuing the proposal to
allow sufficient time to resolve the concerns, and suggested
that the property owners select a representative or
representatives and meet with the applicant to discuss and
resolve the concerns.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on the density, figures listed
in the Staff Report being inconsistent; density being con-
sistent with the General Plan, but there should be continuity
with surrounding homes and the new development in the area, and
continuing the proposal for thirty (30) days to allow
resolution of the concerns.
Motion by Commissioner Gilenson to continue Tentative Tract Map
23988 for 30 days, second by Commissioner Brinley.
Commissioner Saathoff asked for discussion, asked for Engineer-
ing Department input on Timey Street.
Senior Civil Engineer O'Donnell stated that they would prefer
that those streets not be cul-de-saced. From an engineering
standpoint, the circulation for the tract is pretty good. -
Commissioner Saathoff commented on Lot "A" and the concern with
the small lots that border Lot "A"; lot sizes, density and the
proposal being compatible with surrounding area; traffic
impacts.
Chairman Brown asked that the homeowners select a representa-
tive and an alternate representative, someone who could make at
least two meetings within the next two weeks, and these names
and telephone numbers given to Mr. Kenyon and staff.
Chairman Brown also suggested that the representative obtain
all the necessary documents, Staff Report, Conditions of
Approval, and the Environmental Impact Report, from City Hall.
If there is anything that you do not understand contact staff
or myself.
Discussion ensued on the earliest possible meeting time the
homeowner's representative and the applicant could meet with
regard to resolution of the concerns, and a time line for
continuation.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Brown called for
the question.
Vote: 2-2 Commissioners Saathoff and Brown opposed.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract Map
23988 to January 17, 1990, second by Chairman Brown.
Approved: 3-1 Commissioner Gilenson opposed.
AGENDA ITEM NO. Jt�
PACE _L OF �/
rd -
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DAVE GUNDERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1989
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 - ORTEGA PARTNERS
At the meeting of November 20, 1989, the Planning Commission
continued this item to allow the opportunity to redesign the
project in response to public testimony taken at the November
29, 1989 meeting.
The applicant, on December 14, 1989, submitted a revised
Tentative Tract Map in an attempt to address the previously
expressed concerns of the Planning Commission and adjacent
property owners. The revised map differs from the previous
map as follows:
1. The number of lots has decreased from 283 to 266, a
difference of seventeen (17) lots.
2. The density has decreased from 3.9 dwelling units per acre
to 3.7 dwelling units per acre.
3. Terra Cotta has been redesigned to reduce straight
sections near the southwesterly corner of the property.
This was done to address concerns over traffic speeds and
to limit access southerly to the adjacent neighborhood.
4. Parcel sizes along the southerly and easterly boundaries
have been substantially increased and are more consistent
with the 75% ordinance criteria; the parcels range from
approximately 66% to 108% of adjacent parcels, except for -
lots located adjacent to the Flood Control District
property and the Wilsey property.
5. Lots 151-155 (which are now re -numbered as lots 168, 169,
170, and 205) have been re -configured to reduce traffic
conflicts; these lots no longer take access off of Terra
Cotta.
It is staff's opinion that the proposed redesign represents an
improvement over the previous and further, that it meets or
exceeds the ordinance requirements in terms of the required
buffer parcel sizes. While some of the parcels are just below
the 75% standard, it should be noted that this does not
include the area the applicant is being asked to dedicate for
a recreational trail. If this area is counted, all lots,
except for lots 265 and 266 are well in excess of the
standard.
The only area where in staff's opinion, there still may be a
concern relates to the density issue. While staff would
prefer to see a reduction in density which is closer to the
2.7 - 3.3 units per acre proposed in surrounding projects, the
density is consistent with the City's zoning and General Plan
standards. Staff would also add that any reduction in density
for tracts within the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District
would adversely impact the assessment fee to be imposed on
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE v�0 OF `T�
Y1
DECEMBER 28, 1989
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988 - ORTEGA PARTNERS
PAGE 2
each new dwelling unit. Staff would also note that the
applicants were advised by staff to meet with neighboring
residents to discuss the revised project prior to the Planning
Commission hearing.
It is recommeded that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 23988 based upon
the Findings and Conditions attached to the staff report and
the following modified conditions of approval:
Engineering
45. Amend existing condition as follows:
Streets "E", "I", "J" and "L" shall have forty (40) feet
width curb to curb.
46. New condition as follows:
Provide a crossing at McVicker Canyon Channel for the
pedestrian -recreation trail.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE fv�7/ OF If/
MUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE
HELD ON THE 20TH DAY OF
THE MEE G WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING
DECEMBER
PLEDGE OF AMEGIANCE was led by Mr. Fred Crowe.
ROLL CALL:
COMMISSION
1
PRESENT: Commissio ers: Brinley, Gilenson, Saathoff, Wilsey and
XCommu
ABSENT: Commission
Also present werDevelopment Director Gunderman,
Planning Manager Thossistant Planner Fairbanks.
MINUTE ACTION ;
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to a rove Minutes of December 6,
1989, as submitted, second by Commission Wilsey.
Approved 4-0 Commissioner Brinley abstain' g
i
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to approve Mi utes of December 13,
1989, as submitted, second by Commissioner Wilse .
Approved 4-0 ,Commissioner Gilenson abstaining
PUBLIC COMMENTS
,,aate
There zbeing no requests to speak, Chairman Brown closed e PUBLIC
COMMENTS section.
BLIC HEARINGS \
1. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners (Continued from
November 29, 1989) - Planning Manager Thornhill stated that
staff is requesting this item be continued to the meeting of
January 3, 1990, to allow the subdivider an opportunity to
redesign the project in response to public testimony taken at
the November 29th meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract Map
23988 to the meeting of January 3, 1990, second by Commissioner
Gilenson.
Approved 5-0
2. Tentative Parcel Map 25347 - Centex Homes - Planning Manager
Thornhill presented a request to subdivide 833.3 acres into 4
lots for financing and conveyance purposes, located on the
south side of Mountain Avenue (extended) and west of Michigan
Avenue.
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m., asking
if anyone wished to speak in favor Tentative Parcel Map 25347.
Mr. Larry Truman, Butterfield Surveys/The Keith Companies,
representing the applicant stated that he would answer any
questions that may arise.
Chairman Brown asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
Tentative Parcel Map 25347. Receiving no response, Chairman
Brown asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving
no response, Chairman Brown asked if anyone wished to speak on
the matter. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown closed the
public hearing at 7:09 p.m.
Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table. There being
no discussion at the table, Chairman Brown called for a motion.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25347 based on the Findings
listed in the Staff Report, second by Commissioner Wilsey.
Approved 5-0 ,1
AGENDA ITEM NO. �-
PAGE OV OF S/
r r
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: GARY THORNHILL, PLANNING MANAGER h�
DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1989
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988, ORTEGA PARTNERS
This tentative subdivision map, generally located westerly of the
terminus of Lincoln Street, was continued from the November 29,
1989 Planning Commission meeting to the December 20th Commission
meeting. The purpose of the continuance was to allow the
subdivider an opportunity to redesign the project in response to
public testimony taken at the November 29th meeting. As of this
date, a revised tentative map has not been filed with the City and
staff review has not occurred. The staff has met with the
subdivider however, and understands that a new submittal will be
made in the very near future.
It is recommended that Tentative Tract Map 23988 be continued to
the January 3, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
/cm b4
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Minutes of Special
November 29, 1989
Page 7
r
Planning Commission Meeting
L PLAN AMENDMENT 88-8 AND ZONE CHANGE 88-12 _ HI N VALLEY
0 CONTINUED
Plan Amen ent 88-8, Zone Change 88 2 based on the Findings
listed in th taff Report and a ption of Resolution No.
89-8, entitled follows:
SOLUTION NO. 89-8
A RESOLUTION OF E Pnh4NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSI E, CALIFO A, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF GENE PLAN AMENDMEN 88-8 TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERA PLAN CHANGING THE
DESI TION OF 18.11 ACRES FRO OW DENSITY RESI-
D IAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
by Commissioner Brinley.
d 5-0
5. General Plan 89-5, Zone Change 89-5, Tentative Tract Map 23988
- Ortega Partners - Planning Manager Thornhill presented a
request to change the General Plan Land Use designation from
Specific Plan and Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Resi-
dential (0-6 dwellings/acre); to pre -zone the site R-1
(Single -Family Residential), for 72.5 acres of land generally
located northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus of
Lincoln Street.
Planning Manager Thornhill stated that staff has concern with
some of the lot sizes, specifically the 75 percent criteria
adjacent to some of the larger lots; would request that the
Commission take input on the tract map and then continue
Tentative Tract Map 23988 for two weeks.
Commissioner Wilsey asked to be excused.
Chairman Brown opened the public hearing at 8:34 p.m., asking
if anyone wished to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment
89-5 and Zone Change 89-5. --
Mr. Jeff Kenyon, Senior Project Manager with California
Communities, representing the land owner, gave a brief update
on their meeting with the school district and their working
together on the possible acquisition of a site for a new
elementary school.
Mr. Kenyon stated that they are working closely with the other
participants of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District to
see that the assessment district successfully goes into place.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak
in favor. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if
anyone wished to speak in opposition.
The following persons expressed concern on Tentative Tract Map
23988 as follows: traffic impacts on Alvarado and the opening
of four side streets; flooding problems in the area; air
quality; density and incompatibility with neighbors;
recreational trail; Environmental Impact Report and Biological
Report, many of the endangered plants and animals in the area
can only be identified in the early Spring; Princo should be
cul-de-saced, or if Princo does go through it should have
consistent front yard setbacks; perimeter fencing should be
consistent with existing homes; there should be a buffer
consistency; traffic signals should be in place by the time
the first occupants move in; fire station should be fully
manned; square footage of homes proposed; law enforcement and
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAuE 0P3/OF 31
Minutes of Special
November 29, 1989
Page 8
GENERAL PLAN
CONTINUED
Planning Commission Meeting
impact on schools.
89-5, ZONE CHANGE 89-5 - ORTEGA PARTNERS
Edward Kane, 15341 Alvarado Street;
Guy Sylvester, 30517 Princo Street;
Lynn Josefsen, 15070 Alvarado Street;
Scott Josefsen, 15070 Alvarado Street;
Rosemary Connelly, 30516 Princo Street;
George Pratt, 15058 Christina Court;
Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln Street;
Gail Batson, 15057 Zieglinde Drive;
Linda Rempp, 15016 Zieglinde Drive;
Pam Eriser, 15049 Larson Road;
Lilly Brown, 30537 Princo Street;
Mike Priske, 15015 LeGaye;
Jim Bishop, 15080 Christina Court;
James Messer, 30528 De La Lama;
Larry Underwood, 15075 Christina Court;
Nickie Deutsch, 15019 Zieglinde Drive;
Carol La Pearl, 32151 Michelle Lane;
Lynn Williams, 15059 Christina Court;
Al Baker, 30580 Coplas
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak
in opposition. Receiving no response, Chairman Brown asked if
anyone wished to speak on the matter. Receiving no response,
Chairman Brown closed the public hearing at 9:05 p.m.
Chairman Brown asked for discussion at the table on the
General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change only.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on the density for the General
Plan Amendment, if approved the density will change, correct?
Planning Manager Thornhill responded that it will, the
allowable density, and on this particular map it will be about
four units per acre.
Mr. Jeff Kenyon, Senior Project Manager California
Communities, stated that on the density issue,..we were under
the impression that we fell within the approximate guidelines
discussed approximately a year and a half ago with Council.
We will make every attempt to look at some of the buffer
zones, and some of the lots that surrounds this particular
property and we will do this in the period forthcoming, prior
to coming back before the Commission.
Mr. Kenyon commented on the following concerns brought up:
drainage, school impact, access, trail system.
Mr. Kenyon then stated that the need for a fire station,
traffic signalization and drainage these issues will all be
mitigated through a combination of what the assessment
district will install and each individual development will
install.
Commissioner Brinley commented on the density, and the 25 foot
wide trail system and the maintenance.
Discussion at the table ensued on the density for the General
Plan Amendment.
There being no further discussion at the table, Chairman Brown
called for a motion.
AGENDA ITEM
nnNO. 3
pA(;F RzOF. r/_
Minutes of Special
November 29, 1989
Page 9
Planning Commission Meeting
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-5, ZONE CHANGE 89-5 - ORTEGA PARTNERS
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council
approval of General Plan Amendment 89-5 and Zone Change 89-5
based on the Findings listed in the Staff Report, second by
Commissioner Gilenson.
Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Wilsey abstained)
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Tentative Tract
Map 23988 to the meeting of December 20, 1989, second by
Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Wilsey abstained)
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to adopt Resolution No. 89-9,
entitled as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-5 TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING THE
DESIGNATION OF 72.5 ACRES FROM A COMBINATION OF
SPECIFIC PLAN AND FLOODPLAIN/FLOODWAY TO LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Second by Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Wilsey abstained)
Commissioner Wilsey returned to the table at 9:25 p.m.
XtMap
l Plan Amendment 89-8, Zone Change 89-9, Tentative Tr t
537 - Brookstone Development - Withdrawn by applic
l Plan Amendment 89-10, Zone Change 89-11 and entative
ap 24213 - Marinita Development - Plan '"g Manager
ill presented a request to change the Ge "al Plan Land
'gnation from Specific Plan and Floodp in/Floodway to
en 'ty Residential (0-6 dwellings acr to pre -zone the
ty R (Single -Family Residential)nd to consider a
single amilysubdivision, for 56.9 acres of land
lly loca ed northwesterly of achado Street at the
us of Prin o Street.
Chairman Brown open d the publi hearing at 9:31 p.m., asking
if anyone wished to sp akin f 'or of General Plan Amendment
89-10, Zone Change 9-11 nd entative Tract Map 24213.
Mr. Scott Fawcett, r r enting Marinita Development,
commented on conditio numb 16, pertaining to the 25 foot
wide equestrian easeme , agree with the dedication --only
question is, along the souther line where it goes to the
adjacent lots there re two homes be g built there, believes
they are going to e a nursery or pre- hool, and doesn't know
how this will be andled.
Mr. Fawcett r quested that condition numb 5 and condition
number 9, amended by changing the wo d "grading" to
"building".
Chairman rown asked if there was anyone else wishi to speak
in favo . Receiving no response, Chairman Brown ked if
anyon wished to speak in opposition.
d following persons expressed concern on Tentative TractXMap
213 as follows: lots size --should be minimum quarter ac4M ;
creational trail; density; drainage; air quality; the
AGENDA ITEM NO. --,�-�
PAGE a'6 OF 31
PREPARED BY:
r
PLANNING DIVISION
REPORT TO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Jerry Haag
Sr. Planning Consultant
OWNER/APPLICANT
Ortega Partners
3090 Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, California 92626
USE
PUBLIC HEARING
GPA 89-5
Z.C. 89-5
T.T.M. 23988
NOVEMBER 29, 1989
APPROVED BY:^� �a��-✓
Gary Thornhill
Planning Manager
A General Plan Land Use Designation Change from "Specific Plan"
and "Floodplain/Floodway" to "Low Density Residential (0-6
dwellings/acre)"; to pre -zone the site R-1 (Single -Family
Residential) and to consider a subdivision consisting of 283
numbered and 5 lettered lots.
SIZE AND LOCATION
72.5 acres of land generally located northwesterly of Machado
Street at the terminus of Lincoln Street.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
EXISTING
LAND USE
Project Site - Scattered vegation/
Vacant
North - Vacant/Single-
Family Residence
East -
South -
West -
DISCUSSION
Single -Family
Residence
Single -Family
Residence
Vacant
ZONING GENERAL PLAN
R -R Specific Plan and
(County) Floodplain/Floodway
R-1 Low Density
Residential
R-1 Low Density
Residential
R-1 Specific Plan
R-1 Specific Plan and
Floodplain/Floodway
The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation change will remove
the requirement for a Specific Plan and delete the floodway and
floodplain designation. These would be replaced by a Low Density
Residential designation. This project is one of several being
processed by the City as part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment
District.
The applicant notes that, a part of the overall assessment
district proceedings, a substantial amount of land use, cirulation
and utility planning has accurred in the general area. Implemen-
tation of the assessment district will also correct drainage
deficiencies on the property to remove flood hazards.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3�
RAGE d;?7 OF 151
r
PUBLIC HEARING
GPA 89-5
Z.C. 89-5
T.T.M. 23988
NOVEMBER 29, 1989
PAGE 2
A pre -zone change has been initiated to the City's R-1 (Single -
Family) zoning district which is in conformity with the proposed
General Plan Amendment request.
Tentative Tract 23988 has also been submitted for City approval.
The subdivision includes 238 single-family lots and five (5)
lettered lots. Primary access for the subdivision will be the
planned extension of Lincoln Street in a north westerly direction.
Secondary access will be provided by extending Timey Street and
Princo Street from the south.
The applicant has also requested annexation of this property to
the City.
ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN
Planning Division Staff concurs with the applicant that
preparation of a specific plan is unnecessary for this and
surrounding properties, since the major elements of a specific
plan, land use, circulation, utilities and environmental have
already been addressed. The City's proposed General Plan calls
for Low Density Residential on this property. No conflicts have
been found between this request and the Policies, Goals and
Objectives expressed in the text of the General Plan.
PRE -ZONING
The proposed R-1 zoning will be consistent with the requested Low
Density Residential.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
The 283 lot subdivision generally complies with minimum City re-
quirements. Lots 95, 234 and 235 are substandard in lot area and
conditions of approval have been suggested to require enlarging
these lots at final map. Concern has also been expressed to the
subdivider about the net area of lots 35, 36, 37, 38, 100 and 101.
These meet minimum City dimensional criteria, but with the amount
of grading and slope banks shown on the map, the actual usable
area for siting a dwelling unit will be reduced. The subdivider
indicated these concerns can be mitigated in the final grading
plan, through the installation of small retaining walls or similar
devices.
The applicant has also proposed the installation of an equestrian
trail (lettered lots "C", "D", and "E") along the southerly and
westerly perimeters of the subdivision. The 25 -foot wide trail
will be owned by and maintained by ?. The City will also explore
the possibility of using the McVicker Canyon Flood Control
Facility, which traverses the site, as a regional trail facility
which could link Lake Elsinore with the rural canyons to the north
west.
Environmental concerns for this request have been addressed in EIR
88-2.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 89-5, approval of
Pre -Zone Change 89-5 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 23988
based upon the following findings and subject to the attached
conditions.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 a
PnuE ,,79 of .S7
r r
PUBLIC HEARING
GPA 89-5
Z.C. 89-5
T.T.M. 23988
NOVEMBER 29, 1989
PAGE 3
FINDINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-5
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use
and allowed density move in keeping with the subject
property's location, access and site characteristics.
2. A significant amount of land use circulation and planning has
already been accomplished on the subject property and on
surrounding properties to eliminate the need to prepare a
Specific Plan.
3. Planned drainage improvements, to be funded and implemented as
part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, will
remove the threat of flood hazards.
4. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is compatible
with proposed surrounding uses and development patterns.
FINDINGS - ZONE CHANGE 89-5
1. The present County of Riverside zoning of "Rural Residential"
is not consistent with the requested General Plan Land Use
Designation of "Low Density Residential" as contained in
General Plan Amendment 89-5.
2. The proposed R-1 zoning, which will become effective upon
annexation, is consistent with General Plan Amendment 89-5.
3. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of land uses
within the City's General Plan and will bring the property
into conformity with the General Plan.
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988
1. The Tentative Tract complies with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan and the R-1 zoning standards.
2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's subdivi-
sion standards and State Subdivision Map Act.
3. The project, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing
and proposed development in the immediate area and will have
minimal adverse impacts on abutting properties.
AGENDA ITEM NO.----�_
PACE 02/COF ✓67
t —
RaUtIVEI) r
JAN 2 9 1990
Planning Depf.
Dear Mr. Mole•ndyk .
I aria writing this letter in regards to the future devel-
opment of the southwest. end of Lake Elsinore, Currently there
are mostly half to full acre properties in this area. I realize
that to expect the developers to maintain this lot, size is not.
realistic- However, I would like to see half acre lots on the
perimeters of those tracts and a GRADUAL reduction in lot size
towards the center of the tract.
I think there is an increasing need for a recreat.iOnal
trail winding
through
all
the
developments
.... exist.ina
and
future. The
time to
plan
for
these
trails
is NOW,
before
the
tracts are in place.
Thanks.for- your time,
Micky Deutsch
15019 =ie,_il ind`=
Lake Elsinore
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF�
I
1
i
1
I
January 30, 1990
Bob € Pam Johnson
15025 Ziegtinde DAive
Lake Eta.inone, CA 92330
4 �
J::L>=^/35CrS
FEB 5IS93
Thank you bon yowt ZetteiL ob JanuaiuJ 24th, kegatding Tentative Tract
No. 23988, which .i.s .in an anew being considered bon. annexation into
the City ob Lake Et inose. I appreciate you bxing.ing your concerns
ob high density to my attention. I have bonwanded a copy ob youA
Zettet to appnopniate County 3ta64 bot study and atso a copy to
Ux. Ron Motendyk, City Manager ob Lake ELsi=,%e_
Ib I of my stabs can be ob bunxhex abs.i.stance, pZeaae beet btee
to contact my obb.ice_
Since2ety,
WALT P. ABRAHAA
Supehv.i,sot, F.inst D.i4tkict
WPA:zg
.>srsunr
._. .- :-- - __ - ... ._ _. _=_n _r .,'_ .-.....r`C.1__:iiGt.'_,T37�010•:T'_1.9r..-
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 3/ OF .S/
SAH 2 9 M,
January 24, 1990
Supervisor Wait Abr--ham
Fourteenth Floor
4080 Lemon St.
Riverside, Ca, 92501
Dear Supervisor Abraham:
This letter is to inform you of a proposed development that
is a potential hazard to the lives of Riverside County
residents as well as destroy their current lifestyle and
lower their property values.
Proposed Tract #23988 is being considered by the City of Lake
Elsinore. Currently the land is located in the County.
The area of this tract is near another development that you
as Riverside County Supervisor denied and then approved when
the developer agreed to lower the density to 1/2 acre. We
applauded your decision then, and we hope you can be of
assistance now. We need your immediate help.
Tract #23988 allows 6000 sq. ft. lots in an area surrounded
by 3/4 to 2-1/2 acre lots. This is not compatible with its
surrounding area.
This tract is unsuitable for this area and would create a
traffic situation that is extremely dangerous. It is
positively unsafe to open the streets of the Woodhaven Tract,
located in the County area, to accommodate traffic from a
development of this magnitude. The Woodhaven Tract has no
street lights or sidewalks. The primary street, Alvarado
St., is difficult enough to navigate at night without
additional traffic to contend with.
I know you have always been concerned with the well being and
safety of your constituents. I hope we can count on you now.
This tract will be annexed into the City and the County may
not even be aware of it at this time.
It would be greatly appreciated if you would take the time to
discuss these problems with the City of Lake Elsinore.
Sincerely, 11
Bob & Pam(�hnson
15025 Zieglinde Drive
Lake Elsinore, Ca, 92330
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3�-
PAGE `3'? OFS1
ee �
7-3
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 33 OF sI
r
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO Ti 1E PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUND114G AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
PHONE # �7 .2�7c
3. THE OVERWHELMING EIG�ATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
DENN/ S J
NAME NAME r
ADDRESS �_ I i ,Fi ,t <, �r ADDRESS /.S =,0 DO ST.'
PHONE # C- r `, 9 le—PHONE #
NAME �frlrE T�D� �� NAME
ADDRESS 15 o9LVALAL)0 ADDRESS 2 �y
!C L S rNJQ LAerrRZZvn�� 9'ZiT)
PHONE # ( -)'-I _ L� �; / PHONE # / f
NAME �Te t 1= M�ci I�r 2 NAME
ADDRESS . < . , ADDRESS / G
t to/ ,
PHONE# '�",S /io3 AGENDA ITEM
tQapal-,L - %7
Denc 3V nc .7
3. THE OVERWHELMING ES�ATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME NAME t}C'—TtPriPLY c�
ADDRESS ��-Gi/ f�ll.pca�C'f�"' ADDRESS
PHONE # PHONE # --X,- '' �
7
NAMENAME ��(it11P A47i)k�'
ADDRESS ADDRESS l�j��l RlVC<rcr)n ,�+-
•-,,. � =C� � -,_,4 z-._L,�, 4; k� Elsrnnrf �Q 9 ��30
PHONE #5 �"PHONE # 1�7�-IyR3
NAME NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS��i%•i,P/�Dp
PHONE # ? S"
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME ��/��G �_�Gti( NAME
ADDRESS 3050 %/hfy � ADDRESS
PHONE # PHONE #
NAME ���rq. NAME
ADDRESS 3o sa�iY ADDRESS
PHONE # 1�.��!�l� PHONE #
NAME l ��/� �, NAME
ADDRESS p ADDRESS
PHONE # 7, -7 77zl . PHONE #
NAME <r�r [ f '�/t<�� NAME
ADDRESS trn�ADDRESS
PHONE # C 7 �`/:3 :3-- PHONE #
NAME ! , i _.�z.-� NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS
PHONE # PHONE #
NAME NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS
PHONE # PHONE #
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF TtiE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME
NAME
.
SS
ADDRESS
S�tADDRESS o5/r.l
�Qkz 1.5�c7c�re ('f}, 92330
L-?.Ee e/J,: one
PHONE*
%/R -126;3
PHONE #
/vol
NAME
( / C �J C
NAME
/b7?
/ U /✓�/(
ADDRESS
J /� /c ;
ADDRESS
L�� I3Q tIAr-A Po '&4 .'
PHONE #
PHONE #
NAME
llli r)
NAME
'�.9ilYup �Y%O.f C
ADDRESS
1, tG? Ql LlnfQ (c?
ADDRESS
CQ
lq)(¢
PHONE #
C Ir� G -G,72 .
PHONE #
- o�
NAME
Mercer
NAME
LLY
ADDRESS
3y5A le L� �t11T1Q
ADDRESS
L . E
4r- Ls/A&,t- 9-2 ? "O
PHONE #
�, J S S 3 S
PHONE #
Q
NAME
/�{ (f ��t✓5
NAME
' ADDRESS
3G 5I$ n,2< ary
ADDRESS
off/
_Lc,
ynj7=CSL /�� o
PHONE #
"� L�� I
PHONE #
7/ _d
l r�/
NAME.��/
NAME(1`i,l
ADDRESS
Os 111 I l l � !l •P Cl 1110
ADDRESS
�� .$f
�AGNDAM
NO�a.�;
Com/PHONE
#
,,
3� OF�
%y6 — /43
,:- PAGE
T�
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME aus NAME
ADDRESS �rrr�CJ ADDRESS
PHONE #
PHONE #
NAME
/L'Y�`fl1 ;hGrrz
NAME
ADDRESS
3ayr3�� c
ADDRESS
PHONE #
_
PHONE #
NAME
�OS3( �f
NAME
ADDRESS
67? VL 3
ADDRESS
PHONE #
4
PHONE #
NAME
%���• x�)CLr/i1�J
�.
NAME
ADDRESS(�557
xq-
ADDRESS
PHONE #
PHONE #
NAME
/-JY��v�'LA�Ct/3-U Fll
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME \� �� NAME
ADDRESS ` CLLLL ADDRESS
PHONE # - �,rf �j /� PHONE #
s.3osa� �uDPto Sr _
- o g yo
/12. eN 7
LaA �z�3
,
:-3
� q
AGENDA ITEM NO.
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF TME WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAMENAME C1 1 ; lCn
l•..� �— t.. �. r 1GjC: � H �.It
ADDRESSI `" �.. ` C I <<1 %( r- Y
j{ � ( ADDRESS J�I�f15 hlllc'.C'OSr _
f I(LX
PHONE # PHONE # (1� !i`7b'
i
NAME NAME,
ADDRESS 1>tJ`� l i II`,z % r ADDRESS
PHONE # ( l - �/ j r PHONE f
NAME NAME
ADDRESS _ -- . i . r - 1 ADDRESS
PHONE # + PHONE # C 1f
NAME NAME�_`i'�
ADDRESS) �_ i 7
-.i- �>ti �"L..•:�4;1 1 ADDRESS
PHONE # 'r �.-i� /x%; PHONE #
NAME/le
e'll� NAME (1l�� �/aC
ADDRESS ADDRESS (/
[f S /3 -3 ( tyL (.2t;���
PHONE # 7 t LLL—i—_ PHONE # `I p- ) p
NAME — j� NAME
ADDRESS
—L fu ADDRESS
,rJ
PHONE # �Jff (p �7 AGENDA ITEM ftln 4,
PAGE 3o OF 4Z
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
t. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME .j
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS -
PHONE f
NAME
L
ADDRESS
:,- PHONE #
1 Ccs (t_ NAME
r,z-11 .2 ADDRESS
JG j ,? scl a PHONE #
Yf.�lh%CT fLI NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
l ADDRESS
c L
1-k . ,2---X �a JP,,4
rti LlQ
J f �. •l= �r�r1 C` Taj t2✓�
�c%-P �%Is!•scQ�-(' �__t- i-L_.�lr/(!ti12 �!j �I�3..�?0
W PHONE #
L'DA•Ac O _� TE/YSfi�✓/1� NAME
Z,7c-F.3 /-eY.V rT ADDRESS A6V i Z1Cl tIhl(1� f�(>
AGENDA ITEM PR
PAGE-4tOF
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
f
NAME
} ADDRESS
I
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
i,'/ce F�s��c�e `iZ33y
I NAME
ADDRESS r 0, 1307C
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME _�� 2 /l GfF NAME �f`I /(i
ADDRESS y- �� ADDRESS
�ccke 7C� tZ
PHONE #7.$ 11 `L �/ PHONE # - /Q
NAMEf NAME
ADDRESS"7i �ADDRESS /5 �sST.
a Gc r_��Grt-N-r(J C�1 ��� I,AKc I-LSIn1nK� �1%�s`tZ.3jc�
PHONE # �7-f PHONE #
NAME cyjy L IAS 2 NAME
ADDRESS � '7 7n Mj,gl ADDRESS
- i,)i k 40 &
PHONE # C -? S - t 67 PHONE #
NAME NAME v Al
ADDRESS ADDRESS I
PHONE # AGENDA IT
�
te�5t ail I _ i�ci�—
PAGE 442 OF
I
. WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
t. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
7 �
NAME ✓ l RIFjGt,U(Gf/gCf NAME
ADDRESS l q 77/ ADDRESS
PHONE #%14
NAME Ken FMSPiY
ADDRESS AIVARADO s><
CR�-e �CS�rvG��
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
C iY)oN
�C-Qis NAME
��7ia
rt�l� ADDRESS
PHONE'*
NAME NAME
V744f-i19n ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE # _6 7Y)PHONE #
NAME NAME
ADDRESS -,V. &s �C`rLE-s� ADDRESS
PHONE # / �.i ' �' 7I ?,n3PHONE #
Gc. -K /Y C -16T J
7f - 50ilp
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDE14TS OF THE WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA
NAME
NAME
ADDRESS
/Sc3�/i s'
ADDRESS
Awe-
Lia w
PHONE
PHONE #
67e--f-Z3sr,
PHONE #
NAME
pl_' ��
NAME
ADDRESS
/s �J�ySeisJ6 '
ADDRESS
PHONE #
67tt c/23g-
PHONE #
NAME
f �
NAME
ADDRESS
1S3yi /,1Lvs Ste-
ADDRESS
�c-3Kr C[ � i,.cazr
PHONE #
PHONE #
NAME
NAME
ADDRESS
1� +
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF TME WEST END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME Lrpti %fjEL�GGGL
ADDRESS
NAME
ADDRES:
NAME
ADDRESS
% PHONE #
AME
ADDRESS
PHONE # l ::Z - ;2�, [�
NAME "l,l, � �_C J -fi�tJ4, /XV
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME�U��f'i�� �L�(�7�-
ADDRESS -s/
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
/�f•C_,(C12C 2 //�k- 7�L�cJn NAME
ADDRESS
CA 9a,330
PHONE #
NAME
nm
IADDRESS
PHONE #
' "S 1, , I
V
L,L. -- 3
LT
IN .,v vre —y
---
AeENBA ITt'for NO.
3 OF ✓��
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE WEST.END AREA ARE OPPOSED
TO THE PROPOSED TRACT #23988 FOR Tt IE FOLLOWING REASONS
1. THE DENSITY INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
2. THE TRAFFIC INCOMPATIBILITY OF TAKING TRAFFIC FROM A LIGHTED CITY AREA WITH
SIDEWALKS TO A COUNTY AREA WITHOUT STREET LIGHTS OR SIDEWALKS.
3. THE OVERWHELMING NEGATIVE AFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE WESTEND AREA.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
4 PHONE #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE # I
NAME f
ADDRESS �c _
PHONE #
NAME / /J
ADDRESS
iySLl7
PHONE #
NAME
/
ADDRESS
PHONE #
/5",
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE #
7/4) 7 7y
NAME
_
ADDRESS
�Sa p A<✓A�Lftt�N di
PHONE #
679 1J 43
NAME
ADDRESS-
January y, 19j0
eir. Dave uunuer:,ian
(;om.nur,ity L'evelopment Lirector
Uity of iaae Elsinore
13,) Soutu Lain Street
Lake nlsinore, California 92330
Lear mi-. uund�rmun:
Ne are opposed to toe proposed hiF,n density of the
Orte,.,a Par users uevelopment - tentative tract ft 23966.
it is not an appropriate density relative to surround-
ing properties.
httacciea are the ulxnatures of concerned city residents ,
of the Laurel Point aevelopiaunt.
.yes ecfully suomitted,
hurl Loyle �f
32173 iiichele yrive
GeorEe Pratt
_ 13056 Cnristina Couru
cam: Jeffrey Kenyon
Oalif.ania 00:1i..unities
cc: City Plan:iin6 Co..,.i.iss�oners
Cnalrm: n Lrown
COm.Assioner Lrllilcy
Co4:missioner Gilencon
Commissioner 3u:it::off
Comic; ssioner ;ti�lsey
cc: Scot Joscfsen
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE_7/AY OF 3�
St�lEl s i UrY� iLL It vnic�: i.,.... n.:S ynyi:Ur'r :i.l I�liY-litic'x ri239bb
' ilc m Tho rrnaan
3aice3 1rn� u,� i e.
3a 1(0.5
0� .
I. Joa y v C'u'C7%'
3-/s7 A
al s/
' a
�c3W -77
J j,Co%C9,v O. C'APcos
32179 Iirc Er D�
(AKC C�SiN62e Cq 233U
Af n�
�z Tll�ZGL
e5�.
i3�.sv ,OAN'El/ w�j�
G,q/4 EGS/Noy � CiF 9z35:
/3 6?;.K Qf1�-
ISvCo0
L i+lere CA 330
/50GZ (�a�/e(ie lcJa-i
/. �� ��/�ih �✓ e _
(214 /C)3-6ey
� G iZ e . 'Pa rrz i C-":
/1'eSi lfti�cl.� z
Lawe
i 7�%►- Soder6e�� KARF� Sder(x
I� dCi�c�t�a✓t"�i�
AGENDA ITEM NO—32,
,
P?OE-fl- OF�1._.
'-(-)AGE e2
�S1L1:1.'1:. UrrJUL•., 'lU UIi. L'.iia 1��>1\i:.3'i.aJ 1.1.'1 iil.a. P:.3'+.. 1 11);1. a5'11Y.11f #239b6
3aJ�o
i,
10
t ,1F ." /•6 I ' "'�_ ri-t '133
-
1�Fi E �Si �oec CA �Z330 L[��� FlSino�t �L
i r c CE vm'l 15 ° 5`1 z�7ha • �-�
k� 1P --v <�. is 33"
�^ f •�r-S1 A�02C� Cry 1z13b• �1S
js-v % 3 ,�Gl-n i� �0 / 5a� s' f�/c-C•4'T1�FC� [-,� '
�„� � /a i' • C � c� � 3 -3v G C CGS /Ii'c�� C �, o .
�p /S' �c(.r ��LE-ltrrwt
7q 150-71
2
33� ( ��
/ cmc
C
9 g
3ai7:5 P-)
c cje��
AGENDA ITE'MNNO. 3�
PAGES,,OF3'/
—Ph G c 3
ESiiil:2r'iS Ul'Yv5iL Tv OiiaLu;A P.. a.i:iLa.J ,iVtiliYr :avl a 1.;ilY—TILLCT k239b6
N14,L"LL n�
I5D43-1 Wei-i+fek- /�ZJ�o
L ,• :C EL.ir)P_Cj �!`I
iP1,1E A;7/fi✓/i%il
r«t 4L
G/ C (�j C 0/3iW C z (.+ �L Ss Jnr t 2
Isotos oi%�u
r�E WAY
L,q �Sr Nt` c v�Y LAYS E�57NoF-F— CFF (i 2330
ti c �2 e d1 "1-11 5 u
r r V\
ty
lA.ke eI5,mre CA 9a33o —
I � -i H -ORP f,
tQ 3�I t0 FO O '(114 A2
Cod
L-'iA e cA
M P i A T;. Jo o /✓A 7-c-,�ZA
tso�44 3a } 70 DC5Qv RA
aj7�-t'�csf'�� n.C.fLyy>D�-,.�-� / % IY,P_ �/J� Ks•. �"'.Cd�:;��o S ...
97,33 a
/<a,�ea 3�1 Or,
52a.�,w�c x'13 3 6
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE.- OF
Lti:rSl Ll:l�"1J Q.tio iB+ '1li l.iilL,vn Iiali'l. 1115 ✓G Y„Llil'':ll it l• bt.1 i.'.LTY — TiLil; rli #23986
Ylk
iCi.��� EL�rIUGR'F. CU
1-17 LI
La�tL�L
����. �l-s►t/�12►r--, CA.`�iZ3��� C=.L.S� ���Rc- �c� `1Z��C
C
/ T
�G.[iLiap-CSW J[.G.C..c'U/J�
60
/Q
/•:��'n (v .j L�.2�-�p�✓
'd�
/...AL'. �/sem i r b r l., � .� /
- G ��\ .•\�)'yl�_ - .__ ...._=
Ylk
iCi.��� EL�rIUGR'F. CU
1-17 LI
La�tL�L
����. �l-s►t/�12►r--, CA.`�iZ3��� C=.L.S� ���Rc- �c� `1Z��C
C
/ T
AGENDA ITEM NO.- a .;L —
PAGE OP
• 'PAC£ 5
LiSiyi I�1 i vYYJ�S� 1v l itth�in Yniiiii�nS u1 4�LvY.•;tiyT DhlliSiTY - T"aCT #23988
lo
/Sato ��nesro. �.r i4�2l
LAZF-00` v-9z3ao
e.a i.7eP�
3L
.✓a.(� CA. 7,2
sEj14 Ci ��>�i� cv_
13
60�"r
0
�roG9 G��'R!Srl�ii gz�3D
�5��c� Ch��7TIw� �
c
Lkz. �(Str\p2 c. Z}
vp4� /1
I S o g� 5 IV) Cl
0
/C
(20
NO. G_—
AGENDA ITEM
SI
PAGE OF
`PA 0. 6
ScSILlh'TS UPYU;E� iU U1ti'itid i..niAt:.S
yLVrL P:.�::T �Jri.SiYY —TnACT #23968
IO1/
t�Av`� MEG���IS
I:50G7 DM I C- `cc L N
SIMORC R. 7,3
612-1-)�p�,
N FT
15 0?3 � -C- )Py`I R:C� �o
_
U
0
/C
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dave Gunderman, Community Development Director It
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 25442: Doug Reuvers
The applicant has requested that this item be continued until
the March 27, 1990, City Council hearing, in order to resolve
access issues for landlocked parcels northerly and north-
westerly of the site.
AGENDA rrEM NO.
PAGE OF
DOCUMENTATION RELATING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-3 - WEST END ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WAS NOT RECEIVED
BY TIME OF PRINTING. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE PROVIDED TO
YOU UNDER SEPARATE COVER AS SOON AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE.
AGENDA ITEM NO. U
---` PAM , OF _.�._
QRRICK, HERRINGTON
& SUTCLIFFE
March 8, 1990
Mr. Ron Kirchner
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Duerr Dml
(213) 680-7013
Re: West Lake Elsinore
Community Facilities District No. 88-3
Dear Ron:
It appears that the property owners are now prepared
to move ahead with the formation of the Community Facilities
District. They now desire to get through the public hearing
and formation of the district and to call the election
approximately 90 days from the date of formation (i.e. on
June 13, 1990). This will enable several of the developers to
solidify their development plans, supported by approved
tentative tract maps and/or development agreements, prior to
the election while fixing the identity of the qualified
electors as being those property owners holding title on the
date of formation.
I have amended the Resolutions originally submitted
in December to reflect the new dates. I will attend the
meeting on March 13, 1990, to make a brief presentation and
answer any questions the City Council may have.
333 South Hope Street • Los Angeles, Calilomia 90071
Telephone 213 680 7000 • Facsimile 213 6804600
San Fraadtta 413 392 1122 • N, York 212 326 8800 • 5arramm10 916 447 9200
.AGENDA ITEM NO. r
PAGE OF
Q RRICK, HERRINGTON
& SUTCLIFFE
Mr. Ron Kirchner
Page 2
March 8, 1990
In the meantime, if you have any questions or
concerns, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
George W. McFarlin
GWM:at/2929m5
cc: John Mandrell, Butterfield/The Keith Companies
Ray Wood, Finance Director
Phyllis Rogers, Assistant City Manager
John R. Harper, City Attorney
Vicki Kasad, City Clerk �—
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3`f'
PAGE OF
RESOLUTION NO. $9-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE ESTABLISHING COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (WEST LAKE
ELSINORE), PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL TAX TO PAY
FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN SUCH
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND CALLING A
SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS WITHIN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT THE QUESTION OF LEVYING SUCH SPECIAL
TAX
WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") of
the City of Lake Elsinore ("the City") has heretofore on
November 14, 1989, duly adopted Resolution No. 89-64 declaring
its intention to establish a community facilities district
under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
"Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"),
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the
Government Code of the State of California, and calling a
public hearing on the question of the establishment of such
community facilities district, which such community facilities
district was designated as "City of Lake Elsinore Community
Facilities District No. 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore)" (the
"Community Facilities District"); and
WHEREAS, prior to the time for such hearing, in
accordance with said Resolution No. 89-64, a report on such
proposal prepared by, or at the request of, the Special
Projects Engineer of the City entitled "Public Report for
Community Facilities District No. 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore)
for the City of Lake Elsinore" and dated December 21, 1989
(the "Public Report"), was filed with the City Council of
City, and such report is incorporated herein and made a part
of the record of the hearing on said Resolution No. 89-64; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution No. 89-64, a
public hearing was convened by the City Council of the City on
December 26, 1989, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m., or as
soon thereafter as the matter could be heard, at the regular
meeting place of the City Council, 545 Chaney Street, Lake
AGENDA ITEM 140. ✓ 9
\ PAGE OFD
3
Elsinore, California 92330, at which hearing the City Council
considered the establishment of the Community Facilities
District, the proposed rate and method of apportionment of a
special tax therein, the proposed appropriations limit
therefor and all other matters as set forth in said Resolution
No. 89-64, and at the above-mentioned time and place for such
public hearing, all persons interested, including all
taxpayers, property owners and registered voters within the
Community Facilities District, were given an opportunity to
appear and be heard, and the testimony of all interested
persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the
Community Facilities District and the levy of such special
tax, or the extent of the Community Facilities District, or
the funding, financing, acquisition and/or construction of
public infrastructure facilities, including streets, drainage,
sewer and water improvements, fire protection and park
facilities, together with necessary appurtenances thereto and
site and right-of-way acquisition (the "Facilities"), or the
establishment of an appropriations limit therefor, or any
other matters set forth in said Resolution No. 89-64, was
heard and considered, and the City Council at the conclusion
of said hearing was fully advised in the premises, and was
authorized to proceed as hereinafter provided; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of all of the foregoing, the
City Council has determined at this time to proceed with the
establishment of the Community Facilities District as provided
by said Resolution No. 89-64 and to submit to the qualified
electors of the Community Facilities District the proposition
in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, in a
duly called election, to authorize the levy of a special tax
pursuant to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special
Tax as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and
incorporated herein and made a part hereof, to pay for the
funding, financing, acquisition, construction, expansion and
rehabilitation of the Facilities proposed to be provided for
2628m5 2
AGENDA ITEM
PAGE OF -51
the Community Facilities District as described in Exhibit B to
Resolution No. 89-64;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AS FOLLOWS:
correct.
Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves and
adopts said Resolution No. 89-64, including the description of
Facilities and the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special
Tax and of the manner of collection of the special tax
attached thereto as Exhibits B and C, respectively, which was
published prior to the public hearing as required by law, and
reconfirms all of its findings and determinations contained
therein, and the special tax in and for the Community
Facilities District shall be as set forth in said Resolution
No. 89-64 and in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein and made a part hereof.
Section 3. The City Council finds and determines
that written protests to the establishment of the Community
Facilities District, or the extent thereof, or the funding,
financing, acquisition, construction, expansion and
rehabilitation of the Facilities, or the levy of the special
tax proposed to be levied in the Community Facilities
District, are insufficient in number and in amount under the
Act, and the City Council hereby further orders and determines
that all protests to the establishment of the Community
Facilities District, or the extent thereof, or the funding,
financing, acquisition, construction, expansion and
rehabilitation of the Facilities, or the establishment of an
appropriations limit, or the levy of the special tax proposed
to be levied in the Community Facilities District, are hereby
overruled and denied.
Section 4. Consistent with Section 53325.6 of the
Act, the City Council finds and determines that the land
within the Community Facilities District, if any, devoted
2628m5
3
AGENDA ITEM NO. _ 3H
\ PAGEOF4 Z
primarily to agricultural, timber or livestock uses and being
used for the commercial production of agricultural, timber or
livestock products will be benefited by the Facilities
proposed to be provided within the Community Facilities
District.
Section 5. The City Council finds and determines
that all prior proceedings had and taken by the City Council
with respect to the formation of the Community Facilities
District are valid and in conformity with the requirements of
the Act, and the City Council determines to.proceed to
establish the Community Facilities District. Accordingly, the
City Council finds, determines and orders that, consistent
with said Resolution No. 89-64, the Community Facilities
District is hereby formed under and pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the Act, the boundaries of which are as set
forth on a map thereof filed with the City Clerk and in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside
pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 89-64.
Section 6. A general description of the Facilities
which the City Council is authorized by law to fund, finance,
acquire, construct, expand and rehabilitate within the
Community Facilities District, which are the Facilities to be
funded, financed, acquired, constructed, expanded and
rehabilitated by the Community Facilities District under the
Act in these proceedings, is set forth in Exhibit B to
Resolution No. 89-64, and the City Council hereby finds and
determines that such Facilities are necessary to meet present
or increased demand placed upon the City as a result of
existing or projected development within the Community
Facilities District.
Section 7. The office which will be responsible for
preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy
obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be
responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant
to Section 53340.1 of the Act is the Office of the Director of
2628m5 4
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE OF15 9
Finance of the City, which is further directed to establish
procedures to promptly respond to inquiries concerning current
and future tax liability.
Section 8. Except where funds are otherwise
available, a special tax sufficient to pay for all the
Facilities, secured by recordation of a continuing lien
against all non-exempt real property in the Community
Facilities District, including the payment of interest on and
principal of bonds proposed to be issued to finance the
Facilities and including the repayment of funds advanced to or
on behalf of the Community Facilities District, annual
administration expenses of the City and the Community
Facilities District in determining, apportioning, levying and
collecting such taxes, will be levied annually within the
boundaries of the Community Facilities District. For
particulars as to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the
Special Tax and the manner of collection of the special tax,
reference is made to Exhibit C hereto which sets forth the
rate and method of apportionment and the manner of collection
of such special tax in sufficient detail to allow each
landowner or resident within the Community Facilities District
to estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to
pay for the Facilities.
Section 9. Upon recordation of a notice of special
tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and
Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the
special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in
the Community Facilities District and this lien shall continue
in force and effect until the special tax obligation is
cancelled in accordance with law or until collection of the
tax by the City Council ceases in accordance with the Rate and
Method of Apportionment of such special tax.
Section 10. Pursuant to Section 3111 of the Streets
and Highways Code, the boundary map of the Community
Facilities District has been recorded in Book 28, page 57-63,
2628m5 5
AGENDA ITEM NO.
\ PAGE OF�,
in the Book of Maps of Assessment Districts and Community
Facilities Districts in the County Recorder's Office of the
County of Riverside.
Section 11. Since there are fewer than 12
registered voters within the Community Facilities District,
the levy of the special tax and the establishment of the
appropriations limitation shall be submitted to the
landowners, as the qualified electors of the Community
Facilities District, with each acre or portion thereof within
an ownership representing one (1) vote. The requirements of
Section 53326 of the Act pertaining to the shortening of time
and the requirement for notice having been waived by each
landowner, the ballots for the special election shall be
distributed by personal or mailed delivery to each of the
landowners within the Community Facilities District. Each
landowner shall have one vote for each acre or portion thereof
that he, she or it owns within the Community Facilities
District, as provided in Section 53326 of the Act.
Section 12. The City Clerk shall provide certified
copies of this resolution, a description and map of the
Community Facilities District of sufficient scale and clarity
to show the boundaries thereof and the Assessor's parcel
numbers for the land therein to the official conducting the --
election within three business days after the adoption of this
resolution.
Section 13. The City Clerk of the City is hereby
designated as the election official for the purposes of
conducting the election in the Community Facilities District
and is hereby requested to take all steps necessary to hold
the election in accordance with the Act and these
specifications.
Section 14. The City Council hereby submits the
question of levying such special tax and the establishment of
an appropriations limit in the amount of $3,000,000 per fiscal
year in connection therewith for the Community Facilities
2628m5
P
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3y
PAGE OF.Sl�
District to the qualified electors within the Community
Facilities District, at an election to be held on Wednesday,
June 13, 1990, all in accordance with and subject to the Act,
all the terms of which shall be applicable to such election.
Section 15. The City Council hereby further directs
that the election at which the question of levying such
special tax and the establishment of an appropriations limit
in the amount of $3,000,000 per fiscal year in connection
therewith is submitted to the qualified electors within the
Community Facilities District shall be consolidated with the
election at which the question of incurring a bonded
indebtedness in an amount not to exceed thirty million dollars
($30,000,000) for the Community Facilities District is
submitted to the qualified electors within the Community
Facilities District, and the question of levying such special
tax shall be combined in one ballot proposition with the
question of incurring such bonded indebtedness and the
question of establishing an appropriations limit for the
Community Facilities District, all as provided by the Act; and
the City Council further directs that the resolution adopted
by the City Council declaring the necessity to incur such
bonded indebtedness shall constitute the notice of the
consolidated election on the combined proposition of
authorizing the levy of such special tax, of establishing an
appropriations limit and of incurring such bonded indebtedness.
Section 16. The City Clerk as the election official
is authorized to canvass the returns of the election pursuant
to Section 23306 of the Elections Code, and the City Council
is thereafter authorized to certify the results of the
election at the next regular meeting.
Section 17. If two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast
upon the question of levying such special tax are cast in
favor of levying that tax, as determined by the City Council
after the canvass of the returns of such consolidated
election, the City Council may levy such special tax within
2628m5 7
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3`
. PAGE OF
the territory of the Community Facilities District under the
Act in the amount and for the purposes as specified in this
resolution. Such special tax may be levied only at the rate
and may be apportioned only in the manner specified in this
resolution, subject to the Act, except that such special tax
may be levied at a rate lower than that specified herein.
Such special tax may be levied only so long as it is needed to
pay for the funding, financing, acquisition and construction
of the Facilities referred to in Section 6 of this resolution,
or so long as it is needed to pay the principal of and
interest on the bonded indebtedness, together with
administrative expenses and other expenses of the Community
Facilities District, incurred by the City and the Community
Facilities District.
2628m5
AGENDA ITEM ISO. J
PAGE I0 OF�
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of
March, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY
2628m5
7
JIM WINKLER-,-MAYOR
AGENDA ITEM NO.
'�' f
PAGE OPAL
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSITION XXX: Shall City of Lake Elsinore
Community Facilities District
No. 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore)
be authorized to finance all or
a portion of the acquisition
and construction of public infrastructure
facilities, including streets, drainage, sewer and
water improvements, fire protection and park
facilities, together with necessary appurtenances
thereto and site and right-of-way acquisition, by
incurring a bonded indebtedness in the principal
amount of $30,000,000 and shall an appropriations
limit in the amount of $3,000,000 per fiscal year
in connection therewith be established for the
Community Facilities District, and shall a special
tax with a maximum rate and method of apportionment
as provided in Exhibit C to Resolution No. 89-64
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore on November 14, 1989, which is
incorporated by reference herein, be levied to pay
for such public facilities, including the payment
of current and future principal of and interest on
such bonds and the annual administration expenses
of the City and the Community Facilities District
in determining, apportioning, levying and
collecting the special tax, and including the
repayment of funds advanced to or on behalf of the
Community Facilities District?
AGENDA ITEMNO. 39
PAGE I 2 OF Sy'
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
WEST LAKE ELSINORE INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT
OF 1982
CENTEX CONSORTIUM - APPLICANT
R80055.9999-b-mkk AGENDA ITER, I 'J. \ 3q
PAGE OFyJ_.f..
N
KMG/TH E KEITH COM -RAN I ES
Planning • Cm Engineering • En,irunmentaI ien ices • landscape Arch I!eO.ure • Lmd Surveying • Puhhc Aorks
December 21, 1989
City Council
City of Lake Elsinore
City Hall
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA. 92330
c/o Ron Molendyk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Community Facilities District No. 88-3 - West Lake
Elsinore Infrastructure Facilities
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is the Community Facility District Report
for Community Facilities District No. 88-3 - West Lake Elsinore
Infrastructure Facilities. In preparing this report, we have
responded to the request of the applicant by setting forth those
facilities and the cost thereof requested to be financed by the
Community Facilities District process.
The development plan for the facilities proposed have not
received final approval from the City staff members, however, the
entire facilities plan has been given tentative approval in order
to undertake the subject Community Facilities District. It is
suggested, therefore, that the approval of the development plans,
and the establishment of requirements, therefore, should be an
appropriate prerequisite to the final approval of the proposed
Community Facilities District.
In preparing this report, we have retained the services of
independent firms and consultants to establish the required
criteria as follows, and these firms or Consultants have been
approved by the City staff.
1. Engineers Report - Milo K. Keith, Consulting Engineer
(Special Project Engineer City of Lake Elsinore).
2. Bond Council - George W. McFarlin, Attorney, Orrick,
Herrington and Sutcliffe.
R80055-9999-b-mkk ��
r,.i,,. ... o -• .......::..::.:r;, „ .,.a„.,,, nr i,;.,.: -,AGENDA ITEM N0.._.
\ PAGE 4 OF
I
r
1-�
City Council
December 21, 1989
Page Two
3. Special Tax Apportionment - David Taussig, David Taussig and
Associates, Inc.
Very truly yours,
RM HE KE TH COMPAN S
John MaY
Project Manager
R80055.9999•b•mkk
AGENDA ITEM No 34
PAGE OF L
I
1-/
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
WEST LAKE ELSINORE INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
(CENTEX CONSORTIUM APPLICANT)
(APPLICANT)
JAMES WINKLER
Mayor
Fred Dominguez (Mayor Pro -tem) William S. Buck
William A. Starkey Gary M. Washburn
Councilmembers
CITY STAFF
Ron Molendyk - City Manager
John R. Harper - City Attorney
Vicki Lynne Kasad - City Clerk
Ron Kirchner - Director of Public Services
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
George W. McFarlin - Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe - Bond Council
John Mandrell - RMG/The Keith Companies - Project Manager
David Taussig - David Taussig & Assoc. - Special Tax Consultant LMilo K. Keith - Consulting Engineer - Assessment Engineer
Vic Dhooge - Miller and Schroeder - Underwriters
00055-9999-b-mkk
DECEMBER 1989
AGENDA ITE -m NO. 31,--
PAGE ' CF
f
I
SECTION I. - INTRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the CITY OF COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of
the local Agency" or "Agency"), did, pursuant to the provisions
of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter
2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the
{ State of California, and specifically Section 53321.5 thereof,
! expressly order the filing of a written Community Facilities
District Report ("Report") with the Agency for a proposed
Community Facilities District. This Community Facilities
District shall be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-3 (hereinafter referred to as the (CFD - No. 88-3); and
t( WHEREAS, the Resolution ordering the Report did direct that the
)1 Report generally contain the following:
a. a description of the public capital facilities and/or
services, if applicable, proposed for the project;
b. a general description of the area to be served by the
facilities --said areas being the boundaries of CFD No.
88-3. -
C. a cost estimate, setting forth the costs and expenses
for providing the public facilities to serve and
benefit the properties and residents within the
t boundaries of the CFD No. 88-3.
' d. the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax
in sufficient detail to allow each landowner or
resident within the proposed District to estimate the
annual amount of payment; and
j e. general terms and conditions relating to the
proceedings.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention
and Resolution ordering the Report as previously approved and
adopted.
Now, therefore I, Milo K. Keith, P.E., authorized Special
Projects Engineer for the City of Lake Elsinore, and appointed
responsible representative to prepare the report pursuant to the
provision of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982,
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government
Code of the State of California, do hereby submit the following
i data:
AGENDA ITEM N0. 3_T�
-1-
PAGE I� OF��
i
SECTION II. - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES
l,/
j A Community Facilities District may finance the purchase,
construction, expansion or rehabilitation of any real or other
tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or
longer.
A general description of the proposed facilities follows:
Grading and construction of streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
street lighting, storm drainage, water, sewer, and utility
improvements (both on and off-site) to serve the development to
be constructed, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work.
Also included are firestation and park facilities as required by
the City of Lake Elsinore.
Based upon the above, it is my opinion that the facilities are
those that are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon
the local Agency as a result of development occurring within the
boundaries of CFD No. 88-3.
Special Project Engineer
City of Lake Elsinore
Milo K. Keith
`
SECTION III. - BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-3
The boundaries of CFD No. 88-3 are those properties and parcels
where services are authorized to be provided and in which special
taxes may be levied to pay for the costs and expenses of the
facilities. The boundaries of CFD No. 88-3 are shown in the
Boundary Map attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION IV. - COST ESTIMATE
+
`
The cost estimate for the Works of Improvement for CFD No. 88-3
tf
L
i
is based upon current dollars and is subject to escalation.
Project facilities, including expenses, is estimated to be
$29,263,295.00 based upon current dollars, subject to escalation.
`
For further particulars, reference is made to Exhibit B, Cost
Estimates.
34
AGENDA STEM NO.
-2- Sq
PAG'ILO7
r
1-�
SECTION V. - RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
J As noted in the Resolution of Intention, all of the property
located within CFD No. 88-3, unless exempted by law, shall be
taxed for the purpose of providing roadway, sewer, flood control
and school facilities to serve the District. Pursuant to Section
53325.3 of the Act, the tax imposed "is a special tax and not a
special assessment, and there is no requirement that the tax be
apportioned on the basis of benefit to any property". However,
this special tax "may be based on benefit received by parcels of
real property, the cost of making facilities or authorized
services available to each parcel or other reasonable basis as
' determined by the legislative body".
The adopted "Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax"
which is printed below (Exhibit C), provides information
sufficient to allow each property owner within each Special Tax
Area of CFD No. 88-3 to estimate the maximum annual amount he
will be required to pay under the Mello -Roos Program. This "Rate
and Method of Apportionment" was adopted by the legislative body
on November 14, 1989, as Exhibit C of the Resolution of
Intention.
Sections A - D, below, provide additional information on the-
1 special tax rate and method of apportionment.
1. A. Explanation of Special Tax Apportionment
When a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD)
is formed, a special tax may be levied on each parcel
of taxable property within the CFD to repay bonded
indebtedness or other expenses incurred by the CFD.
This special tax must be apportioned in a reasonable
manner; however, the tax may not be allocated on an ad
valorem basis.
When more than one type of land -use is present within a
CFD, several criteria may be considered when
apportioning the special tax. Generally, criteria
based on building square footage, lot size, density
and/or land -use are selected, and categories based on
such criteria are established to differentiate between
parcels of property. These categories are a direct
result of the Developer's product mix, and are
reflective of the land -use types within the CFD.
Special special tax levels are assigned to each
category, with all parcels within a category paying the
same special tax.
The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act does not
require that special taxes be apportioned to individual
parcels based upon benefit. However, in order to
insure fairness and equity, benefit principles
are
AGENDA ITEM{ ANO. y
-3- PAGE OFA
r
1-/
taken into account when setting special tax rates. The
major underlying assumption inherent in the application
of different special tax rates for different
residential unit types within CFD No. 88-3 was that the
level of benefit received from the CFD -financed public
improvements by a parcel varies directly with that
unit's size and type. This assumption is borne out
through an examination of commonly accepted statistical
measures of public facility usage.
For example, in measuring average weekday vehicle trip -
ends, the 1989 edition of Trip Generation by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers singles out size
of residential unit as the primary determinant of trip -
end magnitude. Trip -ends per residential dwelling unit
are typically highest for large single family detached
(SFD) homes and become progressively lower for smaller
SFD homes, townhomes, condominiums and apartments,
respectively. Furthermore, 1980 Census data for Los
Angeles County indicates that the number of persons
residing in a housing unit also increases with the size
of that unit. Logically, households with greater
numbers of residents will generally use local public
improvements and facilities more than households with
fewer residents.
Drainage requirements are higher for larger residential
uses due to the fact that larger units have a higher
percentage of impervious ground cover than smaller
units.
Residential water and sewer requirements are based
primarily on the number of bathrooms and fixture units
in the home and the population of the household. Both
criteria tend to vary directly with the size of the
dwelling unit. Water requirements for lawn sprinklers
and swimming pools also tend to vary directly with home
size.
The relationship of the special tax rates for the
residential categories designated in the "Rate and
Method of Apportionment" for CFD No. 88-3 can be
expressed in terms of Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs).
For example, if the EDU assigned to a category is fifty
percent higher than that assigned to a second category,
then the special tax levied on a dwelling unit in the
former category would be fifty percent higher than that
levied on homes in the latter category (e.g., 1.50 EDUs
versus 1.0 EDUs).
-q .AGENDA ITEM No. 39
`; PAGE }nOF
I
The EDUs assigned to different residential categories
are based on the projected square footage within each
category, as size was shown to generally reflect the
benefits received. A sufficient number of categories
were selected to establish equity between categories by
insuring that the same special tax would be levied on
homes of similar size. Exhibit D illustrates the
direct correlation between the projected square
footages of the residential categories in the "Rate and
Method of Apportionment" (Exhibit C) for CFD No. 88-3
and the EDUs assigned to these categories.
Based on the types of improvements that are proposed
for CFD No. 88-3 and the factors described above, the
special taxes assigned to specific unit types are
generally proportionate to the relative benefits
received by them, and, accordingly, the special taxes
in CFD NO. 88-3 can be considered to be fair and
reasonable.
B. Projected Development and Bond Sales
Based on the Developer's projections, a total of 1,769
residential units will be developed. It is expected
that a single bond issue will be sold.
C. Projected Special Tax Rates
Exhibit C lists the maximum special tax rates for
developed and undeveloped property for each Area. The
district shall determine the annual special tax levy
based upon the method described in Exhibit C below, to
the extent necessary to pay interest and principal on
the bonds, replenish bond reserves and pay
administrative expenses of the District.
Exhibit E contains estimates of the special tax rates
necessary to meet the proposed financial obligations
for each Improvement Area. EXHIBIT E INTENDED TO
PROVIDE A THEORETICAL EXAMPLE OF THE SPECIAL TAX RATES
WHICH MIGHT BE GENERATED IN THE DISTRICT ASSUMING
TWENTY-FIVE YEAR BONDS ISSUED WITH AN AVERAGE COUPON
INTEREST RATE OF 8.26 PERCENT. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE
THAT TAX RATES WILL BE AT OR BELOW THE LEVELS INDICATED
IN THIS EXHIBIT.
D. Special Tax Rates If Actual Level of Development
Falls Below Projected Levels
Should the density of development within each Special
Tax Area of the District fall significantly below the
level projected in the Developer's current development
plans, it may be necessary to increase taxes above the
-5-
34
AGENDA ITEMNO.
PAGE -2L OF
maximum levels for developed property unit types listed
in Tables A and B of Exhibit C. If an increase should
be necessary, the tax rates for developed parcels shall
be increased proportionately above their maximum levels
until the District's revenue needs are met. However,
under no circumstance shall the tax on a developed
parcel be increased to the point where it is higher
than the greater of $0.19 per usable square foot of
assessor's parcel for Special Tax Area A and $0.05 per
usable square foot of assessor's parcel.for Special Tax
Area B or the tax for that parcel as listed in Tables A
r- and B of Exhibit C.
VI.
E. Accuracy of Information
In order to develop the special tax formula and to
determine the maximum tax rates set forth in Exhibit C,
information regarding annual absorption, land -use types
and net acreage was provided by the Landowner and his
Consultants to David Taussig and Associates, Inc. IT
IS THE LANDOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THAT THIS
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT. DAVID TAUSSIG AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. DISCLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE
IMPACT OF ANY SUCH INACCURATE DATA ON THE MAXIMUM TAX
RATES ESTABLISHED FOR THIS CFD, INCLUDING THE INABILITY
TO MEET THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE DISTRICT.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
a. Substitution Facilities -
The description of the public capital facilities, as
set forth herein, is general in nature. The final
nature and location of improvements and facilities will
be determined upon the preparation of final plans and
specifications. The final plans and specifications may
show substitutes in lieu of, or modifications to,
proposed work. Any such substitution shall not be a
change or modification in the proceedings as long as
the facilities provide a service substantially similar
to that as set forth in this Report. An illustrative
site plan showing proposed improvements is shown in
Exhibit B.
b. Bonds -
The financing of the public capital facilities as set
forth in this Report, requires that bonds be issued
pursuant to the terms, conditions and authorization of
the Community Facilities Act of 1982, which is Chapter
2.5, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the
State of California, commencing with Section 53311, and
specifically Article 5.
AGENDA ITEM f10•
GE as OF�
L
c. Appeals and Interpretation Procedure
Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount or
formula of the special tax is in error may file a
/ notice with the Agency appealing the levy of the
1 special tax. An appeals panel of three members, as
1 appointed by the Agency, will then meet and promptly
review the appeal and, if necessary, meet with the
applicant. If the findings of the Appeals Board verify
that the tax should be modified .or changed, a
recommendation at that time will be made to the Agency;
and, as appropriate, the special tax levy shall be
corrected. If applicable in any case, a refund shall
be granted.
Interpretations may be made by the Agency by resolution
for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity
as it relates to any category, zone, rate, or
definition applicable to these proceedings.
It is my opinion that the special tax rate and method of
apportionment, as set forth, is fair and equitable, uniformly
applied, and not discriminatory or arbitrary.
1 Special Projects Engineer
City of Lake Elsinore
,?n 4b
Milo K. Keith
L_
'7_ 'AGENDA ITEM NO. 39
PAGE � O�S1-1_
t HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WTTHIH WP �HG PROPOSED
BOUNOARIES OF COMWNm FACILITES GSTNLT NO M -S OF THE Cm OF
LAKE EL INORE. COUNTY OF RIYERL STATE Cf CWFORHM, WAS
"PROVED BY THE Cm COUNCIL OF THE OrTY OF LAKE ELSINORE AT A
REGUL MEETING HEREOF HELD OH T E My IX It .—
"-a.
ter"-a. BY, ITS RESOMTTOH HO. _ " -' G
Ylqu KASAD, cm aEF+K
INDEX MAP
NLEO THIS --iin oar OF G' ✓c ^r eet . TEE>. AT TME HOUR OF
/.DD OYLCCK M„
OF
IN BOOK eN PAGE v- a
ASSESSMENT ANO COMMUNITY FAOLTIES CISTRICTE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTT REWROER OF THE COUNTY OF RR'ERSIOE, STATE OF
C FORHU.
NO. '7y3
EEE '•P e
Y4 E CONERLY. COUNTY RECORDER
BY: l�f
DEPUTY
LEGEND I'
_ BYMNR w DISTRICT 3 {..E
i91 -t6 -n Ad's PARm Na
RR �TEM1It I':.'V - ss _
AGENDA
Ll
PAGE_. - L'
RI T.aen
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
WEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0, 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET 1 OF 7
.F mFw ,SET t ounwT RvoM. - mm.pv H. raw Im ��...w a.M n i «�o.em
L
E.
-__ LEGEND
� IOMMT 6 OISTIIR
at-n+r •tss�t•• rrrm ria
�- ruern swam
1
/AGENDA is-: .. 314
PAGE-aOF--!=a
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
VEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO , 86-3
I IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET 2 OF
LEGEND
lP1D.Rl 6 Ox6'IRxR
Yso.-5 •sa�'t ..m ria
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3LI
PAGE OF_a.�
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
WEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0, 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET 3 OF 7
..mo- �m a emmx .u.om ®e..n.e. �o- um u -a• -w m.e ,.. rao-.xm
L
0
1
n�.a �nn itD�l
lFllOi.
W`I
1II Tom.c, Q
hq I I 1
._t
16
I I
nx-
--I L --J L
--
II �
3f9-02. 9
1K 1L.• I1
n) it
vy'il J I axl-0,.. � am-0S.w
11) C i
I r a u 43 I I q2 I G I Il F 40 I I 9 i t 3B I d I !7
nlc'
a �
IIx_ ,�� � ISI Ii ISI Iii I.
.IW�MLTO.
LEGEND
--� 161D4R 6 DIRItILT
,llcn SU.D..a
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3y
PAGE ^^/._OF
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
VEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET 4 OF 7
LEGEND
�owr* s otm�cr
vias � ,saw'• rw�m ree[x
...m .ate...
AGENDA ITEM N0-2
\ PAGE
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
WEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA'
b
h400
LEGEND
ct
easww+ oc omicx
>v-o>sssars nm rre[x
• AGENDA ITEM
� No.
=
4
PAGE ..L OF +-�—i--
j DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
WEST LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0, 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET 8 OF 7
9
I
C t
f EXHIBIT B
t
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
City of Lake Elsinore
MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982
COST ESTIMATES
(Rounded to $1,000)
I. PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
Street Improvements
Description Quantity Unit Price
Grand Avenue 5000LF $ 459.00
t Lincoln Street 370OLF $ 251.00
{ Total Street Improvements
fj Storm Drain Improvements
{ Description Quantity Unit Price
Line B-1 South 720OLF $ 225.00
McVicker Canyon Debris Basin L/S
Line C North 17,000LF $ 240.00
Rice Canyon Storm Drain L/S
Total Storm Drain Improvements
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Description Quantity Unit Price
Northshore Sewer System:
VCP Sanitary Sewer 15,200LF $ 45.00
Pump Stations Modifications L/S
Total Sanitary Sewer IMPROVEMENTS
{ Water System Improvements
4_
L1
L
Cost
$2,295,000.00
$ 929,000.00
$3,224,000.00
Cost
$1,627,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$4,104,000.00
$ 520,000.00
$7,751,000.00
Cost
$ 684,000.00
$ 560,000.00
$1,244,000.00
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Cost
3.5 MG Reservoirs
L/S
$1,628,000.00
Booster Pump
Station
L/S
$ 195,000.00
Main Supply
Line
1600
$ 45.00
$ 72,000.00
Total Water
System
ImproverPnte
91_R45.000.00
Page 1
of Exhi
AGENDA ITEM NO.
\ PAGE OF
0
I
I
Public Improvements
Description Quantity Unit Price
McVicker Canyon Park L/S
Lincoln Street Fire Station L/S
Total Public Improvements
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
CONTINGENCIES
GRAND TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
II. CONSTRUCTION INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Cost
$1,800,000.00
$ 970,000.00
$2,770,000.00
$16,904,000.00
$ 750,000.00
Preliminary Design
$
110,000.00
Design Engineering
$1,730,000.00
25,000.00
Design Surveys
$
105,000.00
Soils Engineering/Testing
$
210,000.00
Environmental Impact Report
$
70,000.00
Construction Surveys
$
351,000.00
City Plan Check Inspection
$1,061,000.00
28,000.00
City Administration
$
150,000.00
Construction Management
$
432,000.00
Contingency
$
150,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
III. FINANCIAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
$17,654,000.00
$4,369,000.00
Assessment Engineer
$
25,000.00
Special Tax Consultant
C
$
25,000.00
Special Absorption Study
$
15,000.00
Legal Expense:
Bond Counsel
$
70,000.00
City Attorney
$
8,000.00
Appraiser
$
28,000.00
Bond Servicing:
Official Statement
$
9,500.00
Printing & Servicing
$
5,000.00
Filing & Recording Fees
$
5,000.00
Registrar & Paying Agent
$
17,500.00
Printing & Advertising
$
7,500.00
City Administration
$
35,000.00
Capitalized Interest*
$3,131,798.00
Contingency
$
200,000.00
j
Page 2 of Exhibit
B
,AGENDA ITEM NO. ✓_
PAGr. OE L
TOTAL FINANCIAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES $3,582,298.00
*Capitalized Interest equals 1.75 years interest
at approximately 7% of the bonds issued.
[ IV. BOND MARKETING AND RESERVE FUND
Reserve Fund @ 10% $2,926,000.00
Marketing @ 2-1/2% $ 732,000
TOTAL BOND MARKETING & RESERVE FUND
V. SUMMARY OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
1 Public Improvements
Construction Incidental Expense
Financial Incidental Expense
Marketing & Reserve Fund
Amount to Bond
$3,658,000.00
$17,654,000.00
$ 4,369,000.00
$ 3,582,298.00
$ 3,658,000.00
X29,263.298.00
For annual debt service and other parameters of financing see
f Exhibit C.
Page 3 of Exhibit B AGENDA ITEM No.
PAGE OF
1 .
Y
N
L
r \
a3• 8 .�<
tS i
S� V
r�
r
3y
AGENDA ITEM�NLl
J
PAGE 7 - CF— —"r—
I
Page 4 -Exhibit
I
EXHIBIT C
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR
PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-3 OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
(WEST LAKE ELSINORE)
j} A Special Tax (the "Special Tax")_ shall be levied on and
collected from each parcel in Special Tax Area A and Special Tax
Area B of Community Facilities District No. 88-3 in each Fiscal
Year, commencing July 1, 1990, in an amount determined by the
City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore through the application
of the appropriate Special Tax for "Developed Property" and
"Undeveloped Property" as described below. All of the property
in CFD No. 88-3, unless exempted by law or by the provisions
hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the
{ manner herein provided.
( A. Definitions.
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
r "Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982,
y being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code
t of the State of California.
"Approved Undeveloped Property" means all Taxable Property in CFD
No. 88-3 as of July 1 of any year not classified as Developed
Property, for which a final tract map has been recorded as of
March 1 of the previous Fiscal Year.
"Assigned Special Tax" means the Special Tax for each Land Use
Class, as determined by reference to Table I and Table II of
Section C below.
"Base Maximum Special Tax" means an amount equal to $0.19 per
square foot of Assessor's Parcel applicable to each parcel of
�. Developed, Approved Undeveloped and Raw Undeveloped Property
within Special Tax Area A in Fiscal Year 1990-91, and an amount
equal to $0.05 per square foot of Assessor's Parcel applicable to
each parcel of Developed, Approved Undeveloped and Raw
Undeveloped Property within Special Tax Area B in Fiscal Year
1990-91.
�- "City" means the City of Lake Elsinore.
"Council" means the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore.
1 12/18/89
L
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 y
'3
PAGE-
:y" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the
,D No. 88-3 which are not exempt from the Special
law or Section E below.
to Land Use Categories.
--h year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 88-3
;orized either as Developed Property, Approved
party or Raw Undeveloped Property, and shall be
in accordance with the rate and method of
etermined pursuant to Sections C and D below.
determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax
:tion C and depending on its location in Special
3, Developed Property shall be assigned to one of
signated in Table I or Table II below. Single
Residential Developed Property shall be assigned
through 4 based on the square footage of the
exclusive of garages or other structures not used
to be constructed on an Assessor's Parcel as set
=iginal building permit issued for such property.
=ntial Developed Property shall be assigned to
ustrial Developed Properties shall be assigned to
;quare footage of a Commercial/Industrial building
:uted from the gross square footage for the
reflected in the building plans upon which the
i:(s) for such parcel was issued. The acreage of a
-strial parcel shall be determined by reference
nt Assessor's Parcel Map and, if appropriate,
'.ant parcel map or other subdivision tract
:he Office of the Recorder for Riverside County.
:3ecial Tax Rate
Loped Property
to
to
map
um Special Tax for an Assessor's Parcel classified
ped Property in Classes 1 through 6 shall be the
f (i) the amount derived by multiplying the square
f such Assessor's Parcel times the Base Maximum
ax or (ii) the Assigned Special Tax determined by
to Table I or Table II below. For purposes of
=ion C, the acreage or square footage of an
parcel shall be determined by reference to the
ant Assessor's Parcel Map and, if appropriate, to
current parcel map or other subdivision tract map
with the Office of the Recorder for Riverside
.y in CFD No. 88-3
Dn building permit
iscal Year.
:ies designated by
ve years or longer
isions of the Act.
1 and ending the
sted in Table I or
ircel is assigned
.eveloped Property
1990-91 means an
Area A and $2,353
Tax, determined
3 by the Council
Property and for
in CFD No.
Undeveloped
i Land Use Class,
that can be levied
to be determined
authorized costs
ose necessary to
the Special Taxes,
inistrative amount
each levy), to pay
e funds for future
no revenues are
amounts delinquent
n past Special Tax
o its proper level
e fund based upon
e for anticipated
past delinquency
or to accumulate
, orized servicgs.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
JJ
PAGE
Page 4
Notwithstanding the above, for Attached Residential
Developed Property, a portion of the acreage in a recorded
jl tract map shall be taxed as Undeveloped Property if building
permits for one or more, but not all, of the units in the
approved condominium or site plan for that map have been
issued. The acreage in a recorded tract map to be taxed as
Undeveloped Property shall equal the proportion of the
associated condominium or site plan's approved units for
which building permits have not been issued, multiplied by
the total acreage within that tract map.
Notwithstanding Section E below, for purposes of computing
the Base Maximum Special Tax for each dwelling unit located
on parcels of Attached Residential Developed Property that
are owned by a homeowner's or property owner's association,
the square footage of the entire Assessor's Parcel shall be
{ included to determine the Base Maximum Special Tax.
r In making the computations set forth in this Section C (1)
tt and in determining the Maximum Special Tax which may be
levied in any Fiscal Year, on July 1, 1991 and on each July
1 thereafter, the Base Maximum Special Tax and the Assigned
Special Tax for each class set forth in Table I and Table II
t shall be increased by an amount equal to 2.0% of the amount
in effect for the previous Fiscal Year.
TABLE I
l ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAXES ON DEVELOPED PROPERTY IN SPECIAL TAX AREA
A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (FISCAL YEAR 1990-91)
PER UNIT (RESIDENTIAL) AND PER ACRE (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL)
C (ALL SPECIAL TAX AREA A PROPERTIES ARE IDENTIFIED ON ATTACHED MAP
AND IN THE "NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN" TO BE RECORDED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DISTRICT)
L Assigned Special
Land Use Density or Tax (Fiscal
Class Description Square Footage Year 1990-91)
1 Single Family 2,800 or more $ 1,969 per
Detached unit
2 Single Family 2,300 - 2,799 SF $ 1,688 per
_ Detached unit
3 Single Family 1,700 - 2,299 SF $ 1,406 per
Detached unit
4 Single Family Less than 1,700 SF $ 1,126 per
Detached unit
L 5 Attached Homes Not Applicable $ 901 per
unit
6 Commercial/ Not Applicable $ 8,277 pe e
Industrial
4_ AG£NDA )TEM NO' ov 5q.
PAGE 5,1
Page 5
The Maximum Special Tax may exceed the Assigned Special Tax for
some Assessor's Parcels within each class if the Base Maximum
Special Tax alternative is used ($0.19 per square foot of
Assessor's Parcel). The Base Maximum Special Tax would be
applied under the Fourth step of Section D (below) to lots larger
than a certain size for each class of Single Family Detached
Property. Single Family Detached lots, larger than the following
minimum sizes, would be taxed at the Base Maximum Special Tax:
Class 1: 10,363 Sq. Ft. Class 3: 7,400 Sq. Ft.
Class 2: 8,884 Sq. Ft. Class 4: 5,926 Sq. Ft.
The Base Maximum Special Tax would also apply to Class 5 if units
are built at densities less than 9.18 units per acre and to all
Class 6 parcels.
{ TABLE II
ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAXES ON DEVELOPED PROPERTY IN SPECIAL TAX AREA B
t OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (FISCAL YEAR 1990-91)
tf PER UNIT (RESIDENTIAL) AND PER ACRE (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL)
(ALL SPECIAL TAX AREA B PROPERTIES ARE IDENTIFIED ON ATTACHED MAP
{ AND IN THE "NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN" TO BE RECORDED IN
I CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DISTRICT)
Assigned Special
Land Use Density or Tax (Fiscal
Class Description Square Footage Year 1990-91)
1 Single Family 2,800 or more $ 1,969 per
Detached unit
2 Single Family 2,300 - 2,799 SF $ 1,688 per
Detached unit
3 Single Family 1,700 - 2,299 SF $ 1,406 per
Detached unit
4 Single Family Less than 1,700 SF $ 1,126 per
Detached unit
5 Attached Homes Not Applicable $ 901 per
unit
6 Commercial/ Not Applicable $ 2,178 per acre
Industrial
L.
The Maximum Special Tax may exceed the Assigned Special Tax for
some Assessor's Parcels within each class if the Base Maximum
Special Tax alternative is used ($0.05 per square foot of
Assessor's Parcel). The Base Maximum Special Tax would be
applied under the Fourth step of Section D (below) to lots larger
than a certain size for each class of Single Family Detached
Property. Single Family Detached lots, larger than the following
minimum sizes, would be taxed at the Base Maximum Special Tax:
Class 1: 39,380 Sq. Ft.
Class 2: 33,760 Sq. Ft.
Class 3: 28,120 Sq. Ft.
Class 4: 22,520novigg
AGENDA ITEM WO
PAGE OF..
C
I Page 6
The Base Maximum Special Tax would also apply to Class 5 if units
are built at densities less than 2.41 units per acre and to all
Class 6 parcels.
2. Undeveloped Property
The Maximum Special Tax for an Assessor's Parcel classified
( as Raw Undeveloped Property or Approved Undeveloped Property
( shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by
multiplying the square footage of such Assessor's Parcel by
the Base Maximum Special Tax (as applicable for each Special
Tax Area) or (ii) the Maximum Assigned Special Tax Rate.
The Assigned Special Tax for Approved Undeveloped Property
shall be $ 990 per lot in both Special Tax Area A and
Special Tax Area B except for recorded lots over 20,000
square feet, for which the Assigned Special Tax shall be
$2,157 per acre. The Maximum Assigned Special Tax for
Approved Undeveloped Property and Raw Undeveloped Property
shall be $9,207 per acre in Special Tax Area A and $2,353
per acre in Special Tax Area B.
' In making the computation set forth in Section C (2) and in
determining the Assigned Special Tax for Approved
Undeveloped Property and the Maximum Assigned Special Tax on
Raw and Approved Undeveloped Property which may be levied in
any Fiscal Year, on July 1, 1991 and on any July 1
thereafter, the Assigned Special Tax for Approved
Undeveloped Property and the Maximum Assigned Special Tax
for Raw and Approved Undeveloped Property shall be increased
by an amount equal to 2.0% of the amount in effect for the
previous Fiscal Year.
D. Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax to Developed
{ Property and Undeveloped Property.
Starting in Fiscal Year 1990-91 and for each following Fiscal
Year, the Council shall determine the amount of money to be
collected from Taxable Property in CFD No. 88-3 in the Fiscal
Year (the Special Tax Requirement).
( The Council shall levy the Special Tax as follows until the
l amount of the levy equals the Special Tax Requirement:
First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each parcel of
Developed Property, exclusive of property exempt from Special
Taxes pursuant to Section E below, in equal percentages (up to
1000) of the Assigned Special Tax Rate for each class of
Developed Property for such Fiscal Year determined by reference
to Table I and Table II;
` AGENDA ITEM NO.✓�� L—�
( . \ PAGE -21 GFy'--t—
I
I
I Page 7
I
Second: If additional monies are needed after the first step has
been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each parcel of
r Approved Undeveloped Property, exclusive of Undeveloped Property
Il exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E (below), in
equal percentages (up to 100%) of the Assigned Special Tax;
i Third: If additional monies are needed after the first two steps
i have been completed,.then the Special Tax shall be levied on each
parcel of Raw Undeveloped Property in equal percentages (up to
100%) of the Maximum Assigned Special Tax for Raw Undeveloped
Property, exclusive of Undeveloped Property exempted by law or by
the provisions of Section E below, up to, for Special Tax 1_rea A,
91.47% of the Special Tax Requirement (i.e. net of revenues
collected in the first and second steps above) and, for Special
Tax Area B, 8.53% of the Special Tax Requirement (i.e. net of
revenues collected in the first and second steps above);
Fourth: I£ additional monies are needed after the first three
steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on
each parcel of Approved Undeveloped Property, exclusive of
Undeveloped Property exempted by law or by the provisions of
Section E (below), in equal percentages (up to 100%) of the
Maximum Assigned Special Tax for Approved Undeveloped Property;
Fifth: If additional monies are needed after the first four
steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on
C each parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is
determined through the application of the Base Maximum Special
Tax Rate shall be increased in equal percentages from the
Assigned Special Tax Rate up to the Maximum Special Tax Rate for
each such parcel for such Fiscal Year;
Sixth: If additional monies are needed after the first five
steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied
proportionately on each parcel of Developed or Undeveloped
Property owned by a Homeowners' Association which has not been
j exempted from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E, up to the
[_ Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; and
Seventh: If additional monies are needed after the first six
steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied
proportionately on each parcel of Developed or Undeveloped
Property conveyed or irrevocably offered to a public agency which
has not been exempted from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E,
up to the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property. u -*j^0
AGENDA ITEM
j No. �y
PAGEu o�
C
I
I
Page 8
I
E. Exemptions
1. _Special Tax Area A
A Special Tax shall not be imposed on up to 156.50 acres of
Undeveloped Property conveyed or irrevocably offered to a public
agency or conveyed to a Homeowners' Association. The acres
exceeding such total of 156.50 acres shall be taxed consistent
with Developed or Undeveloped Property to the extent set forth in
Steps Six and Seven of Section D above. Under no circumstances
shall the Council impose a Special Tax on land which is a public
right of way or which is an unmanned utility property utilized
fcr the provision of services to the public or a property
encumbered with public or utility easements making impractical
its utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the
easement.
2. Special Tax Area B `
A Special Tax shall not be imposed on up to 486 acres of
Undeveloped Property conveyed or irrevocably offered to a public
agency or conveyed to a Homeowners' Association. The acres
exceeding such total of 486 acres shall be taxed consistent with
f Developed or Undeveloped Property to the extent set forth in
t Steps Six and Seven of Section D above. Under no circumstances
shall the Council impose a Special Tax on land which is a public
right of way or which is an unmanned utility property utilized
for the provision of services to the public or a property
encumbered with public or utility easements making impractical
its utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the
easement.
F. Review/Appeal Committee
The Council shall establish as part of the proceedings and
administration of CFD No. 88-3 a special three-member
Review/Appeal Committee. Any landowner or resident who feels
j that the amount of the Special Tax, as to their parcel, is in
( error may file a notice with the Review/Appeal Committee
appealing the amount of the Special Tax levied on such parcel.
The Review/Appeal Committee shall interpret this Rate and Method
of Apportionment of the Special Tax and make determinations
relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any
landowner or resident appeals, as herein specified. The decision
of the Review/Appeal Committee shall be final and binding as to
all persons.
AGENDA ITEM NO._aq
C \ CC��''
PAGE -.L OF -5_L4,
Page 9
G. Manner of Collection.
The special taxes for CFD No. 88-3 will be collected in the same
manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem .property
r taxes, provided, however, that CFD No. 88-3 may collect Special
ii Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary
to meet its financial obligations. In the event of a
delinquency, CFD No. 88-3 will pursue foreclosure in a timely
manner.
t.
t
L
L-
l-.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 (j
PA"- J
p
SCALE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3y
Lul''��d1 OF
PAGE M -
EXHIBIT TO
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR PROPOSED
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT W, 88-3
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY 0= RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(Portion of Exhibit C)
),/
RELATIONSHIP OF EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT
ASSIGNMENTS TO PROJECTED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
RESIDENTIAL A ux>r� FOR
CITY OF LAKE LSCIAN E CFD NO. 88-3
SPECIAL TAX AREAS A & B
' 1,700 SF = 1.00 EDU
EDU
PROJECTED
RANGE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
> 2.80
RANGES FOR
CLASS
RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES
1
SFD ( 2,799 SF)
2
SFD 2, 00-2,799 S
3
SFD 1,700-2,299 SSP4
SF (<1,700SF)
' 1,700 SF = 1.00 EDU
EDU
ACTUAL
RANGE
EDU
> 2.80
1.75
2.30-2.80
1.50
1.70-2.30
1.25
<1.70
1.00 '
AGENDA ITEM NO. -34
PACE OF U
r
C
LAGENDA ITEML{NOO.
PAGE OF
EXHIBIT E
PROJECTED
SPECIAL TAXES FOR
CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE CFD NO. 88-3
SPECIAL
TAX AREAS A & B
SINGLE
FAMILY DETACHED
SINGLE
FAMILY DETACHED
SINGLE
FAMILY DETACHED
(2.800 SF AND ABOVE)
(2,300-2,799 SF)
(1,700-2,299SF)
FISCAL
NOF
TAX!
TOTAL
MOF
TAXI
TOTAL
NOF
TAXI
TOTAL
YEAR
UNITS
UNIT
REVENUES
UNITS
UNIT REVENUES
UNITS
UNIT
REVENUES
1989-90
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
1990-91
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
1991-92
37
$2.008
$74,301
163
$1.721
$280,564
388
$1.434
$556,538
1992-93
37
$2.048
$75,787
311
$1,756
$546,015
721
$1,463
$1,054,868
1993-94
37
$2.089
$77,302
381
$1,791
$682.290
882
$1,492
$1,316,230
1994-95
37
$2.131
$78,848
418
$1,827
$763,521
969
$1,522
$1,474,983
1995-96
37
$2,026
$74,957
447
$1,736
$776,193
1,019
$1,447
$1,474,534
1996-97
37
$2,021
$74,785
447
$1,732
$774,418
1,019
$1,444
$1,471,163
1997-98
37
$2,018
$74,652
447
$1,729
$773,035
1,019
$1,441
$1,468,537
1998-99
37
52,020
$74,751
447
$1,732
$774,062
1,019
$1,443
$1,470,488
1999-00
37
$2,063
$76,325
447
$1,768
$790,360
1,019
$1.473
$1,501,448
2000-01
37
$2.106
$77,930
447
$1,805
$806,983
1,019
$1,504
$1,533,027
2001-02
37
$2.150
$79,568
447
$1,843
$823,939
1,019
$1,536
$1,565238
2002-03
37
$2,196
$81,238
447
$1.882
$841,234
1,019
$1,568
$1,598,094
2003-04
37
$2,242
$82,941
447
$1,921
$858,875
1.019
$1,601
$1,631,607
2004-05
37
$2.289
$84,679
447
$1,962
$876.869
1,019
$1,635
$1,665.789
2005-06
37
$2.337
$86,451
447
$2.003
$895,222
1,019
$1.669
$1,700,656
2006-07
37
$2,385
$88,259
447
$2,045
$913.943 -
1.019
$1,704
$1,736,219
2007-08
37
$2435
$90.103
447
$2,087
$933,038
1,019
$1,739
$1,772,494
2008-09
37
$2.488
$91,984
447
$2,131
$952,515
1,019
$1,776
$1,809494
2009-10
37
$2.538
$93,903
447
$2,175
$972,381
1,019
$1,813
$1,847,235
2010-11
37
$2,591
$95,859
447
$2,221
$992,645
1,019
$1,851
$1,885.730
2011-12
37
$2,645
$97,856
447
$2,267
$1,013,315
1,019
$1,889
$1.924,996
2012-13
37
$2,700
$99.891
447
$2,314
$1,034,397
1.019
$1,928
-$1,965,046
2013-14
37
$2.756
$101,968
447
$2,362
$1,055.901
1,019
$1,968
$2,005.898
2014-15
37
3636
$23.539
447
$545
$243,747
1,019
$454
$463,047
LAGENDA ITEML{NOO.
PAGE OF
f
I
11
I
L
I
1-/
I .4mo 0 1.3 111111
PROJECTED SPECIAL TAXES FOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO. 88-3
•62'�.+�`r:r,11'sn.:.-:t'-i.3.3.'ri:+%..: .:`� X,'.'c.0 :..:
SPECIAL TAX AREAS A & B
APPROVED UNDEVELOPED LOTS RAW UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
NOF
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
-
(LESS THAN 1,700 SF)
FISCAL
NOF
TAX/
TOTAL
YEAR
UNITS
UNIT
REVENUES
1989-90
0
$0
$0
1990-91
0
SO
SO
1991-92
54
$1,148
$61.965
1992-93
72
$1,170
$84,272
1993-94
72
$1,194
$85,958
1994-95
72
$1,218
$87,677
1995-96
122
$1,158
$141,231
1996-97
172
$1,155
$198.657
1997-98
222
$1,153
$255,949
1998-99
266
$1.154
$307,085
1999-00
266
$1,179
$313,551
2000-01
266
$1,204
$320,145
2001-02
266
$1,229
$326,872
2002-03
266
$1,255
$333.733
2003-04
286
$1,281
$340.732
2004-05
266
$1,308
$347,870
2005-06
266
$1,335
5355,152
2006-07
266
$1,363
$362,578
2007-08
266
$1,392
$370,154
2008-09
266
$1,421
5377.881
2009-10
266
$1,450
$385,762
2010-11
266
$1.480
$393,801
2011-12
266
$1.511
$402,001
2012-13
266
$1,543
$410,365
2013-14
266
$1.575
$418.896
2014-15
266
$364
$96,699
•62'�.+�`r:r,11'sn.:.-:t'-i.3.3.'ri:+%..: .:`� X,'.'c.0 :..:
SPECIAL TAX AREAS A & B
APPROVED UNDEVELOPED LOTS RAW UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
NOF
TAX/
TOTAL
NOF
TAX/
TOTAL
LOTS
LOT
REVENUES
ACRES
ACRE
REVENUES
NA
$0
m
486.3
$0
SO
642
$0
SO
486.3
SO
$0
499
$0
SO
309.8
$0
SO
231
$936
$216,299
172.6
$143
$24,599
124
$955
$118.431
109.1
$784
$85,534
129
$84
$10,800
75.0
50
$0
50
$0
50
39.6
50
$0
50
50
50
25.8
$0
80
44
$0
50
12.1
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
50
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
SO
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
50
$0-
0
$0
$0
0.0
50
$0 --
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
50
50
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$O
0
$0
50
0.0
$0
50
0
$0
$0
0.0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0.0
50
$0
AGENDA IT�E�M/ N0. __11Z
PAOF .�
0
r
e
RESOLUTION NO. 89-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARING THE NECESSITY TO
INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS TO PAY FOR CERTAIN
PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (WEST LAKE ELSINORE),
CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE
QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT THE PROPOSITION OF
INCURRING SUCH BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND
DESIGNATING THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY AS THE
ELECTION OFFICIAL
WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") of
the City of Lake Elsinore ("the City") has heretofore on
November 14, 1989, duly adopted Resolution No. 89-64 declaring
its intention to establish a community facilities district and
to levy a special tax to pay for certain public facilities in
and for such community facilities district under and pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5, Part
1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of
California, which such community facilities district was
designated as "City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities
District No. 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore)" (the "Community
Facilities District"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore on
November 14, 1989, duly adopted Resolution No. 89-65 declaring
its intention to incur a bonded indebtedness in the amount of
thirty million dollars ($30,000,000) to finance certain public
infrastructure facilities, including streets, drainage, sewer
and water improvements, fire protection and park facilities,
together with necessary appurtenances thereto and site and
right-of-way acquisition (the "Facilities") within the
Community Facilities District, such bonded indebtedness to be
secured by the levy of a special tax within the Community
Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 89-64, a public
hearing was held by the City Council on December 26, 1989, at
which hearing all persons interested, including all taxpayers,
AGENDA ITEM NO. -L I
PA3E
51 OF-"a�
property owners and registered voters within the Community
Facilities District were given an opportunity to appear and be
heard, and the testimony of all interested persons or
taxpayers for or against the establishment of the Community
Facilities District and the levy of the special tax therein,
or the extent of the Community Facilities District, or the
furnishing of the Facilities, or the establishment of an
appropriations limit therefor, or any other matters set forth
in said Resolution No. 89-64, was heard and considered; and
WHEREAS, at the end of said public hearing the City
Council duly adopted a Resolution of the City establishing the
Community Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution No. 89-65, a
public hearing was held by the City Council on December 26,
1989, at which hearing any persons interested, including all
taxpayers, property owners and registered voters within the
Community Facilities District, were given an opportunity to
appear and be heard on the proposed debt issue or any other
matters set forth in said Resolution No. 89-65, and they were
permitted to present any matters relating to the necessity for
incurring such bonded indebtedness to pay for all or a portion
of the Facilities and to be secured by a special tax to be
levied within the Community Facilities District; and
premises;
WHEREAS, the City Council is fully advised in the
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AS FOLLOWS:
correct.
Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and
Section 2. The City Council hereby declares and
deems that the public convenience and necessity require and it
is necessary that bonded indebtedness be incurred to finance
all or a portion of the Facilities as more particularly set
forth in Exhibit B to Resolution No. 89-64 for the Community
Facilities District.
2628m5
2
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3y
PAGE A OF ,�.1.
E
Section 3. The purpose for the proposed bonded
indebtedness is to finance (i) the acquisition, construction,
expansion and rehabilitation of the Facilities, including
incidental expenses consisting of the costs of planning and
designing the Facilities, including the costs of environmental
evaluations thereof, (ii) the cost of providing consultant and
administrative services, (iii) all costs associated with the
establishment of the Community Facilities District, the
issuance of bonds, the determination of the amount of any
special taxes to be levied, the cost of collecting any special
taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the
authorized purposes of the Community Facilities District,
together with any other expenses incidental to the
acquisition, construction, completion and inspection of the
Facilities.
Section 4. The whole of the territory within the
Community Facilities District will be benefitted by such
bonded indebtedness and will be subject to a special tax to
pay for such bonded indebtedness, as set forth in the
resolution establishing the Community Facilities District.
Section 5. The amount of the proposed bonded
indebtedness to be incurred to finance all or a portion of the
Facilities (including incidental expenses as authorized by the
Act) is thirty million dollars ($30,000,000).
Section 6. The maximum term of the bonds shall not
exceed forty (40) years from the date of the bonds, or the
date of any series thereof.
Section 7. The maximum annual rate or rates of
interest to be paid on the bonds shall not exceed the maximum
annual rate permitted by law at the time of the sale of the
bonds, as determined at that time, payable semiannually
commencing the first March 1 or September 1 following their
date.
Section 8. The City Council hereby declares that
the proposition of incurring such bonded indebtedness shall be
2628m5 3
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3g}
PAGE— LA -OF -EL
submitted to the qualified electors within the Community
Facilities District and shall be combined in one ballot
proposition with the question of levying a special tax within
the Community Facilities District and the establishment of an
appropriations limit in the amount of $3,000,000 per fiscal
year in connection therewith, all in accordance with and
subject to the Act, all the terms of which shall be applicable
to such election.
Section 9. An election shall be and is hereby
called and ordered to be held in the Community Facilities
District on Wednesday, June 13, 1990, at which election there
shall be submitted to the qualified electors within the
Community Facilities District the combined ballot proposition
of levying a special tax, of establishing an appropriations
limit and of incurring such bonded indebtedness, such combined
ballot proposition to read substantially as set forth in
Exhibit A hereto, with such changes therein as shall be
requested by the City Clerk as the designated election
official of the Community Facilities District.
Section 10. If the combined proposition for the
levying of such special tax, the establishing of such
appropriations limit and the incurring of such bonded
indebtedness receives the approval of more than two-thirds
(2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the bonds may be
issued and sold for the purpose for which authorized, and the
bonds (except where funds are otherwise available) shall be
paid exclusively from the annual levy of such special tax and
are not and shall not be secured by any other taxing power or
funds of the City or other public agency or the Community
Facilities District.
Section 11. The City Council does hereby submit to
the qualified electors within the Community Facilities
District at said special election the combined ballot
proposition described in Section 9 of this resolution, and
designates and refers to said proposition in the form of
2628m5
4
AGENDA ITEM
NO. 314
PAGE �C SG- OF,5 q
0
Section 3. The purpose for the proposed bonded
indebtedness is to finance (i) the acquisition, construction,
expansion and rehabilitation of the Facilities, including
incidental expenses consisting of the costs of planning and
designing the Facilities, including the costs of environmental
evaluations thereof, (ii) the cost of providing consultant and
administrative services, (iii) all costs associated with the
establishment of the Community Facilities District, the
issuance of bonds, the determination of the amount of any
special taxes to be levied, the cost of collecting any special
taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the
authorized purposes of the Community Facilities District,
together with any other expenses incidental to the
acquisition, construction, completion and inspection of the
Facilities.
Section 4. The whole of the territory within the
Community Facilities District will be benefitted by such
bonded indebtedness and will be subject to a special tax to
pay for such bonded indebtedness, as set forth in the
resolution establishing the Community Facilities District.
Section 5. The amount of the proposed bonded
indebtedness to be incurred to finance all or a portion of the
Facilities (including incidental expenses as authorized by the
Act) is thirty million dollars ($30,000,000).
Section 6. The maximum term of the bonds shall not
exceed forty (40) years from the date of the bonds, or the
date of any series thereof.
Section 7. The maximum annual rate or rates of
interest to be paid on the bonds shall not exceed the maximum
annual rate permitted by law at the time of the sale of the
bonds, as determined at that time, payable semiannually
commencing the first March 1 or September 1 following their
date.
Section B. The City Council hereby declares that
the proposition of incurring such bonded indebtedness shall be
2628m5 3
AGENDA ITEMS �QNo.g}
3
PAGE- -1- OF I L_
submitted to the qualified electors within the Community
Facilities District and shall be combined in one ballot
proposition with the question of levying a special tax within
the Community Facilities District and the establishment of an
appropriations limit in the amount of $3,000,000 per fiscal
year in connection therewith, all in accordance with and
subject to the Act, all the terms of which shall be applicable
to such election.
Section 9. An election shall be and is hereby
called and ordered to be held in the Community Facilities
District on Wednesday, June 13, 1990, at which election there
shall be submitted to the qualified electors within the
Community Facilities District the combined ballot proposition
of levying a special tax, of establishing an appropriations
limit and of incurring such bonded indebtedness, such combined
ballot proposition to read substantially as set forth in
Exhibit A hereto, with such changes therein as shall be
requested by the City Clerk as the designated election
official of the Community Facilities District.
Section 10. If the combined proposition for the
levying of such special tax, the establishing of such
appropriations limit and the incurring of such bonded
indebtedness receives the approval of more than two-thirds
(2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the bonds may be
issued and sold for the purpose for which authorized, and the
bonds (except where funds are otherwise available) shall be
paid exclusively from the annual levy of such special tax and
are not and shall not be secured by any other taxing power or
funds of the City or other public agency or the Community
Facilities District.
Section 11. The City Council does hereby submit to
the qualified electors within the Community Facilities
District at said special election the combined ballot
proposition described in Section 9 of this resolution, and
designates and refers to said proposition in the form of
2628m5
4
AGENDAITEM
NO. 314
PAGE COFL7 .
ballot hereinafter prescribed for use at said election.
(a) Said special election shall be held and
conducted, and the votes thereat canvassed and the returns
thereof made, and the results thereof ascertained and
determined, as herein provided; and in all particulars not
prescribed by this resolution said special election shall be
held and conducted and the votes received and canvassed in the
manner provided by the laws regulating elections of the City
and consistent with the Act.
(b) The requirements of Section 53326 of the Act
have been waived by each landowner; the ballots for the
special election shall be distributed by personal or mailed
delivery to each of the landowners within the Community
Facilities District. Each landowner shall have one vote for
each acre or portion thereof that he, she or it owns within
the Community Facilities District, as provided in Section
53326 of the Act.
(c) All qualified electors qualified to vote at
elections in the Community Facilities District upon the date
of the special election herein provided for shall be qualified
to vote upon the measure submitted at said special election.
(d) On the ballots to be used at said special
election, in addition to all other matters required by law to
be printed thereon, shall appear the measure described in
Section 9 hereof. Each voter to vote for said measure and for
levying said special tag, establishing such appropriations
limit and incurring said bonded indebtedness shall mark the
ballot card in the space opposite the word "YES" or to vote
against said measure and against levying said special tag,
establishing such appropriations limit and incurring said
bonded indebtedness shall mark the ballot card in the space
opposite the word "NO."
(e) The City Clerk shall commence the canvass of
the returns of the special election at 9:00 A.M. on the day
following the date of the special election and at the
2628m5
5
AGENDA ITEM NO. 39 C
PAGE 5 L OF—LLLL.
conclusion thereof shall determine the results of the special
election and shall certify said results to the City Council.
(f) The City Council shall declare the results of
said special election at the neat regular meeting following
receipt of the certificate from the City Clerk, and shall
cause to be spread upon its minutes a statement of the results
of said special election as ascertained by said canvass.
Section 12. The City Clerk is hereby directed upon
the passage and adoption of this resolution to publish a copy
of the same once a week for two (2) succeeding weeks in the
Sun Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the area of
the Community Facilities District, in accordance with
Section 53352 of the Act. This publication shall constitute
notice of said special election at which the combined
proposition of levying a special tax, establishing an
appropriations limit and incurring a bonded indebtedness is
submitted to the qualified electors within the Community
Facilities District, and no other notice of said special
election need be given.
2628m5
C
AGENDA ITEM NO•�((�
PAGE �� OF�2 _L
A
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of
March, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY
2628m5
7
JIM WINKLER,'MAYOR
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 I
PAGE OF —LLL
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSITION XXX: Shall City of Lake Elsinore
Community Facilities District
No. 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore)
be authorized to finance all or
a portion of the acquisition
and construction of public infrastructure
facilities, including streets, drainage, sewer and
water improvements, fire protection and park
facilities, together with necessary appurtenances
thereto and site and right-of-way acquisition, by
incurring a bonded indebtedness in the principal
amount of $30,000,000 and shall an appropriations
limit in the amount of $3,000,000 per.fiscal year
in connection therewith be established for the
Community Facilities District, and shall a special
tax with a maximum rate and method of apportionment
as provided in Exhibit C to Resolution No. 89-64
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore on November 14, 1989, which is
incorporated by reference herein, be levied to pay
for such public facilities, including the payment
of current or future principal of and interest on
such bonds and the annual administration expenses
of the City and the Community Facilities District
in determining, apportioning, levying and
collecting the special tax, and including the
repayment of funds advanced to or on behalf of the
Community Facilities District?
3 LI
AGENDA ITEM[N�JO. 5
PAGE �.L—{- OF�
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-3
Prepared by: `� ����/ /\ Approved by:
Milo K. Keith Ron Molendyk
Special Projects Engineer City Manager
I think you are familiar with the project as this is a
continuation item from your December 26, 1989 council meeting.
If you have any questions, the staff will be prepared to answer
them at the meeting.
The City Council approved the formation of the District on
November 14, 1989. The Project Report has been prepared, which
includes a rate and apportionment requirements for a Special Tax
as required by Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the
— Government Code of the State of California.
The project hearing was continued at your December 26, 1989
meeting in order to make certain adjustments to the report with
particular reference to public works of construction funds being
adequate.
The report has been revised, and attached herewith are the
revised pages to reflect these revisions:
Title Page - Noted as Revised
Page 2, and 3 - Minor Changes
Exhibit B, Page 1, 2, and 3 - New Project Costs
Exhibit D, and E - New Projected Special Tax Costs
Upon approval of the report, and the order for filing thereof
under Section 53321.5 of the Government Code, the Community
Facilities District No. 88-3 will be underway.
RCFD88-3-b-mkk
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council proceed with the
procedures for final undertaking and completing the subject
Community Facilities District (CFD 88-3) as recommended by the
Special Bond Counsel, George McFarlin.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I wish to apologize for the lateness of the revised report
values; however, the final estimate costs and bond values were
not available until March 9, 1990.
If you approve the report, and proceed with the CFD, we will
print and bind twenty-five (25) new copies of the revised report
for filing in the City records.
RCFD88-3-b-mkk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3H
PAGE OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
WEST LAKE ELSINORE INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
(CENTEX CONSORTIUM APPLICANT)
(APPLICANT)
JAMES WINKLER
Mayor
Fred Dominguez (Mayor Pro -tem) William S. Buck
William A. Starkey Gary M. Washburn
Councilmembers
CITY STAFF
Ron Molendyk - City Manager
John R. Harper - City Attorney
Vicki Lynne Kasad - City Clerk
Ron Kirchner - Director of Public Services
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
George W. McFarlin - Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe - Bond Council
John Mandrell - RMG/The Keith Companies - Project Manager
David Taussig - David Taussig & Assoc. - Special Tax Consultant
Milo K. Keith - Consulting Engineer - Assessment Engineer
Vic Dhooge - Miller and Schroeder - Underwriters
DECEMBER 1989
REVISED
MARCH 1990
RCFD88-3-b-mkk
AGENDA ITEM N0. 34
\ PAGE OF -LL
SECTION II. - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES
A Community Facilities District may finance the purchase,
construction, expansion or rehabilitation of any real or other
tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or
longer.
A general description of the proposed facilities follows:
Grading and construction of streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
street lighting, storm drainage, water, sewer, and utility
improvements (both on and off-site) to serve the development to
be constructed, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work.
Also included are firestation and park facilities as required by
the City of Lake Elsinore.
Based upon the above, it is my opinion that the facilities are
those that are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon
the local Agency as a result of development occurring within the
boundaries of CFD No. 88-3.
Special Project Engineer
City of Lake Elsinore
i
/9")1_L e k 'u,4fG.
Milo K. Keith
SECTION III. - BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-3
The boundaries of CFD No. 88-3 are those properties and parcels
where services are authorized to be provided and in which special
taxes may be levied to pay for the costs and expenses of the
facilities. The boundaries of CFD No. 88-3 are shown in the
Boundary Map attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION IV. - COST ESTIMATE
The cost estimate for the Works of Improvement for CFD No. 88-3
is based upon current dollars and is subject to escalation.
Project facilities, including expenses, is estimated to be
$28,309,012.00 based upon current dollars, subject to escalation.
For further particulars, reference is made to Exhibit B, Cost
Estimates.
-2-
RCFD88-3-b-mkk
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF�
SECTION V. - RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
As noted in the Resolution of Intention, all of the property
located within CFD No. 88-3, unless exempted by law, shall be
taxed for the purpose of providing roadway, sewer, flood control
and fire station facilities to serve the District. Pursuant to
Section 53325.3 of the Act, the tax imposed "is a special tax and
not a special assessment, and there is no requirement that the
tax be apportioned on the basis of benefit to any property".
However, this special tax "may be based on benefit received by
parcels of real property, the cost of making facilities or
authorized services available to each parcel or other reasonable
basis as determined by the legislative body".
The adopted "Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax"
which is printed below (Exhibit C), provides information
sufficient to allow each property owner within each Special Tax
Area of CFD No. 88-3 to estimate the maximum annual amount he
will be required to pay under the Mello -Roos Program. This "Rate
and Method of Apportionment" was adopted by the legislative body
on November 14, 1989, as Exhibit C of the Resolution of
Intention.
Sections A - D, below, provide additional information on the
special tax rate and method of apportionment.
A. Explanation of Special Tax Apportionment
When a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD)
is formed, a special tax may be levied on each parcel
of taxable property within the CFD to repay bonded
indebtedness or other expenses incurred by the CFD.
This special tax must be apportioned in a reasonable
manner; however, the tax may not be allocated on an ad
valorem basis.
When more than one type of land -use is present within a
CFD, several criteria may be considered when
apportioning the special tax. Generally, criteria
based on building square footage, lot size, density
and/or land -use are selected, and categories based on
such criteria are established to differentiate between
parcels of property. These categories are a direct
result of the Developer's product mix, and are
reflective of the land -use types within the CFD.
Special special tax levels are assigned to each
category, with all parcels within a category paying the
same special tax.
The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act does not
require that special taxes be apportioned to individual
parcels based upon benefit. However, in order to
insure fairness and equity, benefit principles are
-3-
RCFD88-3-b-mkk
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OE
EXHIBIT B
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
City of Lake Elsinore
MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982
COST ESTIMATES
(Rounded to $1,000)
PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
Street Improvements
Description Quantity Unit Price
Grand Avenue 5000LF $ 474.00
Lincoln Street 370OLF $ 254.00
Le Gaye Street 150OLF $ 135.00
Total Street Improvements
Storm Drain Improvements
Description Quantity Unit Price
Line B-1 South 720OLF $ 235.00
McVicker Canyon Debris Basin L/S
Line C North 17,000LF $ 240.00
Rice Canyon Storm Drain L/S
Total Storm Drain Improvements
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Description Ouantity Unit Price
Northshore Sewer System:
VCP Sanitary Sewer 15,200LF $ 45.00
Pump Stations Modifications L/S
Total Sanitary Sewer IMPROVEMENTS
Water System Improvements
Description Ouantity Unit Price
3.5 MG Reservoirs L/S
Booster Pump Station L/S
Main Supply Line 1600 $ 45.00
Total Water System Improvements
Page 1 of Exhibit B
Cost
$2,370,000.00
$ 939,800.00
$ 202,500.00
$3,512,300.00
Cost
$1,692,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$4,080,000.00
$ 518,000.00
$7,790,000.00
Cost
$ 684,000.00
$ 625,000.00
$1,309,000.00
Cost
$1,628,000.00
$ 195,000.00
$ 72,000.00
$1,895,000.00
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 L4
PAGE (0 OFII
II
III
Public Imorovements
Description Quantity Unit Price Cost
McVicker Canyon Park L/S $ 500,000.00
Lincoln Street Fire Station L/S $ 970,000.00
Total Public Improvements $1,470,000.00
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION $15,976,300.00
CONTINGENCIES $ 1,400,000.00
GRAND TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION $17,376,300.00
CONSTRUCTION INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Preliminary Design
$
110,000.00
Design Engineering
$1,217,000.00
30,000.00
Design Surveys
$
292,000.00
Soils Engineering/Testing
$
111,000.00
Environmental Impact Report
$
70,000.00
Right-of-way Acquisition
$
100,000.00
Construction Surveys
$
323,600.00
City Plan Check Inspection
$
980,480.00
City Administration
$
50,000.00
Construction Management
$
453,350.00
Contingency
$
50,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INCIDENTAL EXPENSES $3,757,430.00
FINANCIAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Assessment Engineer
$
27,000.00
Special Tax Consultant
$
30,000.00
Special Absorption Study
$
15,000.00
Legal Expense:
Bond Counsel
$
72,500.00
City Attorney
$
8,000.00
Appraiser
$
28,000.00
Bond Servicing:
Official Statement
$
9,500.00
Printing & Servicing
$
5,000.00
Filing & Recording Fees
$
5,000.00
Registrar & Paying Agent
$
17,500.00
Printing & Advertising
$
5,000.00
City Administration
$
20,000.00
Capitalized Interest*
$3,470,000.00
Contingency
$
65,700.00
TOTAL FINANCIAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
$3,778,200.00
Page 2 of Exhibit B
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 9-=
PAGE OF -11—
tow
W
0i116M
*Capitalized Interest equals 1.75 years interest
at approximately 7% of the bonds issued.
BOND MARKETING AND RESERVE FUND
Reserve Fund @ 10%
Marketing @ 2%
TOTAL BOND MARKETING & RESERVE FUND
SUMMARY OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
Public Improvements
Construction Incidental Expense
Financial Incidental Expense
Marketing & Reserve Fund
Amount to Bond
$2,830,902.00
$ 566,180.00
$3,397,082.00
$17,376,300.'00
$ 3,757,430.00
$ 3,778,200.00
$ 3,397,082.00
$28,309,012.00
The total public works improvement cost reflects six (6) months of
investment earnings.
For annual debt service and other parameters of financing, see
Exhibit C.
Page 3 of Exhibit B
AGENDAITEM NO. 3q
PAGE v OFII
l i 111i17' .)
ASS GNM1�N '1111
1C,U�vP�ROl VQ'! U CNp�UAR� Iii)O1 GEi01=
CITY Or- 1,N) hl:I SINOR�ic( 1I`n �018-3
SPUCIAI. TAX. ARUAS A & A
' 1,700 SF = 1.00 EDIJ
EDU ACTUAL
RANGE EDU
i 65 1.75
3--) -• 1.65 1.50
00- 1.35 1.25
<_ 1 00 I nn
AGENDA ITEMC{NO. -JJ.�
PAGE _1._ OF—li—
PROJEC 111)
SQUARG FOOTAGE:
RANGESFOR
CLAS, $
RESiUEN'iIAL,CAI.1:G;;)HIFa
2
SFU(2.300-2,799 S)`)
3
SFD 1.700-2.299 SF)
A
CF (-r 1.7()0 CS')
' 1,700 SF = 1.00 EDIJ
EDU ACTUAL
RANGE EDU
i 65 1.75
3--) -• 1.65 1.50
00- 1.35 1.25
<_ 1 00 I nn
AGENDA ITEMC{NO. -JJ.�
PAGE _1._ OF—li—
11 1.1 I-. [I t 1 1{ I j. IL1 . -4 L 11 ,, ..' 1 l 1 1 l,-1 S- 1- taa H b S V . .
P12O)L'CII ti 1) IA f. T'.AX;;S Ft)It
CITY Ol: LAKE 1d1.SIN01th CPU Nu. 8841
AGENDA ITEM NO. '3 9
PAGE OF <
SINGLE
FAMIt.Y DETACHED
".IRC!.:
I A)III :' 7i I Ai H7:
SINCIE
FAMILY OETACHEO
(2,600 SF AND
ABOVE)
(2_
3lxV > T9) SP)
(1,700
- 2,200 SF)
FISCAL
# OF
TAX/
TOTAi
4 (11
1'cg/
10110.
4' OF
TAX/
TOTAL
YEAR
UNITS
UNIT
REVENULS
UNIT'.
41'11
!*V?T;Mt;
UNITS
UNIT
REVENUES
1060-90
0
Sc
Sn
0
„
.>0
0
SO
SO
1000-91
0
$0
$(1
0
SO
0
SO
SO
1991-02
37
$2.008
S7n: <IU
0.0
t!;:45'
S: -e,012
305
$1,434
$600,477
IIP92-93
37
$2,040
$75.790
300
41,7'r
#b.^.G OnO
007
3'.463
31.019.573
1091.94
37
$2,000
577.37.
DN
51.'^1
SWt'A 14
653
S1..97
$1,272.725
1094-0S
37
$2,131
8788511
403
3t. rr
47,:0340
037
51.52:
$1628,020
1990-07
37
52.030
5751:«70
1?1
5t,: ui
57:MMXI
082
$1,454
$7627002
1997-P8
37
$2031
$75. t43
4(11
$I:; -LI
-,7.t:) q88
982
$1460
81624,008
1098-90
37
$2032
87G, i 81
.4'11
.;.'1111,
''117:1:^6
082
$1461
$1.424,840
1990-00
37
$2,075
$76.785
4^.
j1,i fp
i,'4,^, 8p6
982
$7461
$1.154028
2000-01
37
92,118
576,376
427
51 s;c
5/0t a5
062
$1,5/3
$1,485,406
2001-02
37
$2.103
$80424
471
313 E•-
S79V508
082
$1,544
51.618.1716
2002-03
37
$2,208
58/,70;
421
$t di?
t/(1C,973
082
$1.577
$1.648.4;"
2003-04
37
$2,264
583.411,
4.1
$1.u3p
S;: Bl.11fs
00:
$1.610
51.6$0,95i
2004-06
37
$2.302
$0'1,161
9D2
$1.644
$1.613.958
2006-08
37
$2,350
580,943
4:'1
S ,, 11
aO tP,OnB
082
$1,078
$1.647719
2006-07
37
$2.309
$811760
4:1
.!"%'
louts, 12
982
$1.713
$1682,156
2007-08
37
32449
SUQ013
.I:!I
ii. 166,
:{DhJ.891
082
51,740
$1717.270
2008-00
37
$2.500
W.504
.1:11
1: 14Z
'tt•t:.7s1
882
$1,785
111.753.06
2000-10
37
$2.662
$04,432
aIt
t4z. V+t.
Su •1, 141
002
$1822
$1.780,650
2010-11
37
$2.606
806,399
4:1
$C."0n
'.,140.176
982
$1,900
$1,820,025
2011-12
37
52.600
$0960!:
4'I
1z:.EQ,
FOb0"t.
982
$1.800
$1.884,016
2012-13
37
$2716
5100.45t
•ICI
S?,fG:'7
SD/9.9.1:0
882
$1.030
$1003.726
2013-t4
37
$2,771
SIOZ531t
431
Ye, .71:
$:.00 "!6
082
$1,979
$1.043.262
2014-16
37
$041
123.710
4111
4•a0
j;','f 1.764
082
$456
$444.353
AGENDA ITEM NO. '3 9
PAGE OF <
FISCAL
YEAR
logo -00
19g0-91
1991-02
1992-93
1993-94
;9" 005-916 os
1985-98
1908-97
1997-08
logo -99
1029-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-06
2005-00
2006-07
2007-08
2000-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
au...c
l;xlal' "' Is
I -OR
CITY OI LAKY. ill SINI INP ('111) No $$ 3
AGENDA ITEM L NO. 3L
I I
PAGE OF—
r,t+p4tT.;a).ua�'N=.i(•FEDI(;I:;
RAW U4t)FVF1 oPFI1 PROPFRTY
91NOLE
FAMILY OE t
Art IF O
(LESS
THAN 1,700 SF)
4 or
TAXI
TOTAL.
NOF
TAXI
IUTAI.
AF'!FMUE.S
ACRES
ACRE
REVENUE
UNITS
UNIT
iVcNW b
girl:•
_ -""
Su
Nn
--
1>C
460 3
so
$0
0
$0
0 2
n
100.4
$0
6
so
64
$1.149
S62X0
;...,
:.tan i41
107 5
73
$0
s0
72
$1,171
561: M7
.17
'-
.,
SJtl7
$70 807
72
S1"106
SUU OJ.1
1:,0
4.n
Sn
t^
ea
t•.a•o
r�>. �.•
`A)
'
F.
2U9
$0
so
122
$1,168
$132516
10
125
f0
SO
172
$1,166
$200,307
w12.5
�'"
`0
S0
s0
222
$1,161
3257 7t30
a't
ac:
0
$0
s0
Zee
s1,ta2
s,T62000
5'
0
6
sos4
268
$1,186
5315,598
6
50
0
so
so
208
$1.211
s3^2.232
0
50
0
266
$1.277
$324')af.
2
7•
5,1
0
$O
SO
260
$1,263
5335.48'1
0
1 t
30
40
0
$0
$0
206
51.282
$342 059
0
0
$0
$0
266
$ 316
5360,112
0
0
$0
$0
206
$1.344
%3G744J
,)
266
Si,372
$36x.61;t
o
0
$0
SO
208
$1400
$3%2X32
t'
to
0
;0
s0
266
$1430
S'180'.w-
°
)
0
S0
S4
206
$1460
$308:a2
0
yn
0
$0
so
200
$1420
S3
10
0
$0
SO
266
$1,621
1404,5615
4
,"
0
0
s0
$O
266
$1,653
$A 12.97R
SO
0
SO
SD
266
$1 .585
s41.i ti()0
�„
•
to
•'
AGENDA ITEM L NO. 3L
I I
PAGE OF—
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Commercial Project 89-9: Pinnacle
Lakeshore #3, A General Partnership;
a request to construct a commercial
center consisting of three (3)
buildings totaling 28,770 square
feet, located approximately 1,200
feet east of Main Street, north of
Lakeshore Drive.
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED BY
Gabrielle Restivo DaveG)dfderman
Associate Planner Comm. ev. Dir.
APPROVED BY:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
At the meeting of February 21, 1990, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of Commercial Project 89-9 by a 4-0
vote, Commissioner Wilsey absent (minutes and staff report
attached). Items discussed included hydroseeding the
existing 1:1 slope, roof mounted equipment, landscape
bonding, the Lakeshore Drive right-of-way, the project
loading area and the blue tile roofing. The conditions of
approval were amended to require erosion control landscaping
in graded areas only, to allow roof mounted equipment behind
a parapet wall, to require the standard landscape bonding, to
uphold engineering right-of-way conditions as submitted, to
require screening of the loading area from the public
right-of-way and to allow the blue tile roofing. The
buildings will be light grey wood siding, dark grey wood trim
and blue tile roofing.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative
Declaration 89-55, and approve Commercial Project 89-9 based
on the findings and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings:
1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan.
2. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
3. If the attached conditions are met, this project will
meet the design directives of Chapters 17.44, 17.38,
17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 71
PAr.F J 0FAX
rd
61
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9
Planning Division
1. Design Review Approval for Commercial Project 89-9 will lapse
and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1)
year from the date of City Council approval.
2. Design review approval will lapse and be void unless building
permits are issued within one (1) year. An extension of
time, up to one (1) year per extension, may be granted by the
Planning Commission prior to the expiration of the initial
Design Review approval upon application by the developer one
(1) month prior to expiration.
3. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented within
the project design in all phases and/or adhered to strictly.
4. These Conditions of Approval shall be attached or reproduced
upon Page One of building plans prior to their acceptance by
the Division of Building and Safety.
5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on
the approved plot plan and elevations. Revisions to approved
site plans or building elevations shall be subject to Design
Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check
shall conform with -the submitted plans as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission through
subsequent action.
6. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be
used unless modified by the Community Development Director or
his designee.
7. Buildings shall be constructed as depicted on plans or as
modified by the Community Development Director or his
designee.
S. A revised site plan and elevation plan shall be submitted to
the Planning and Building Departments by the applicant prior
to Building Division issuance of permits which reflects all
conditions of approval. These revised plans shall become the
approved plans only upon the review and approval by the
Community Development Director or his designee.
9. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utili-
ties.
10. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's
Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion
shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of
Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques.
Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days
after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer.
11. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject
to the approval of the Chief Building Official.
12. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and
ordinances.
13. Meet all State handicap requirements.
14. Meet all Riverside County Health Department requirements.
15. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
16. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as
approved by the Community Development Director.
AGENDA ITE;,
r r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
17. No roof ladders shall be permitted.
18. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire
rating.
19. The design and construction of the project shall meet all
County Fire Department standards for fire protection and
shall include emergency vehicle turning radius, and fire
resistance requirements for all buildings including
sprinklers where required, and any additional requirements
requested by the Fire Safety Specialist in the February 13,
1990 conditions letter. A fire detector check assembly shall
be required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. A
letter shall be submitted verifying compliance prior to
issuance of building permits.
20. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six -inches (611)
lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well and
shall be painted to match the building. Evidence of
compliance shall be included in building plans.
21. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the
building.
22. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with
the center's design theme. Mailboxes shall be submitted for
approval prior to issuance of building permits, subject to
the approval of the postal service and the Community
Development Director or his designee.
23. Brick pavers shall be laid in bank designs and shall be
located at the driveway approaches and crosswalks.
24. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major commercial
uses. Placement, design and quantity shall be indicated on
the final landscaping plan, and subject to the approval of
the Community Development Director.
25. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and
approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for a
$100.00 per plan fee, and the Community Development Director
or his designee.
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic
sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the
City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30 -feet apart and
at least 15 -gallon in size, as approved by the
Community Development Director.
C) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (611) high and six-inch (611)
wide concrete curb.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress
points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches
(36").
e) The Landscape plan shall provide for ground cover,
shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the
City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
f) Landscape planters shall include an appropriate park-
ing lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot
shading in fifteen years.
AGENDA ITEM NO....t,.,
PAGE `? OF -
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
g) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and
screened as part of the landscaping plan.
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion
of installation of landscape requirements
approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and
labor for one (1) year.
i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
within affected portion of any phase at the time a
Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any
building.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved
site plan.
k) Landscaping shall be required to screen all loading
areas.
1) Final landscape plans to include planting and
irrigation details.
m) All slopes created by any grading shall have a
permanent irrigation system and erosion control
vegetation installed, approved by the Planning
Division.
26. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed
on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property
and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane
of the fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the
architecture of the building. No wall park units shall be
permitted.
27. All signage shall be by City Permit.
28. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the
center which specifies harmonious and consistent colors,
materials and specifications which will enhance the center's
design and meet the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. All
signage including free-standing signs shall be by City Permit
and in conformance with the approved Master Signage Program.
The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or release of utilities.
Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of
each sign.
29. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements
of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and
shall incorporate all district conditions and standards as
stated in the January 18, 1990 "will serve letter".
30. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow
striping and shall meet City Standards for loading zones.
This project shall be designed so that every building is
provided with a 12' x 20' loading space as required by the
City's Municipal Code.
31. Trailers utilized during construction shall be approved by
Planning Division.
32. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
AGENDA ITEM NO. a- — •1/- 90 lk _ i
PAGE�L OF
r
r
OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
33. Parking stalls shall be double -striped with four -inch (411)
lines two -feet (21) apart.
34. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all
internal one-way drive aisles.
35. A bus -stop shelter shall be provided on Lakeshore Drive in
proximity to Golden Spectrum. Lake Point Park provided it is
consistent with the traffic study or as approved by the
Community Services Department or his designee.
36. 3�riar--e--3ssxanee--fr€-brrrleksg�eertar,-appsrcarct aha�l-gay
a34-4ees--------------
DELETED
37. Any additional required dedications for public right-of-way
shall be provided for on site plan.
3.8. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits,
the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of
Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
a) Provide a minimum five (5) foot wide landscape
planter along the westerly property line and for all
parking planter islands.
b) Provide a total of three (3) trash enclosures or
provide at least one double -receptacle enclosure and
one single receptacle enclosure.
C) Revise site plan to reflect 24 foot driveway
entrances and ingress/egress locations consistent
with sight distance traffic study prior to issuance
of building permits.
d) Changes to the grading plan which exceed an eight (8)
foot hillside cut must be reviewed and approved by
the Community Development Director or his designee.
e) The loading area is to be completely screened from
public right-of-way view and/or shall be located
behind commercial building.
Engineering Department:
39. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued.
40. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained
from the Engineering Department.
41. Dedicate sufficient land along Lakeshore Drive frontage to
provide for a 100 foot street right-of-way (R/W) and to
insure future alignment of Lakeshore Drive with Limited
Street and Lake Management Development.
42. Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the
applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for review and approval prior to
issuance of building permit.
43. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26).
AGENDA ITEM N3.�`.--lye., - — -_
PAGE _.L_ OF — -- -
r
r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9
44. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water district, stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project.
Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
45. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of
building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
46. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared
by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be to Riverside
County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City
Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
47. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12,
Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78).
48. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11"
mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before
final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled
and approved.
49. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities
(power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall
be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent.
50. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by
Riverside County Fire Department.
51. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on
street improvement plans, as required by the City Engineer.
52. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage
acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
53. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed
through site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method
approved by the City Engineer.
54. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports of review and approval
by City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion
downstream caused by development of site and diversion of
drainage.
55. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including street
design recommendations. Provide final Soils Report showing
compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification/
slope stability analysis.
56. Contribute $34,700 for the design and construction of half a
median on Lakeshore Drive along abutting property line.
57. Contribute $7,000 toward the widening of the San Jacinto
River Bridge at Lakeshore Drive. Development will increase
traffic volume at the bridge at least 1% and should
contribute 1% of the cost of the bridge.
58. Developer shall contribute $4,000 towards the design and
construction of a traffic signal at Lakeshore and Limited.
This development will increase traffic at the intersection at
least 3% and should contribute 3% towards construction.
59. Contribute $500.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign
Program.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE L2 OF
r r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
60. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works
improvements as established for the project by the City
Engineer prior to building permit.
61. An engineer shall verify sight distances for safety for left
turn movements exiting driveways and relocate driveways if
necessary or restrict to right -turns only.
62. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Code 16.20).
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE _� OF ----- - -
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 3
BUSINESS ITEMS
5. Commercial Project 89-9 - Pinnacle/Lakeshore #3 A General
Partnership - Associate Planner Restivo presented a request to
construct a commercial center consisting of three buildings
totaling 31,500 square feet, on five gross acres, located
approximately 1,200 feet easterly of Main Street, north of
Lakeshore Drive.
Associate Planner Restivo requested the addition of condition
number 38.e, which will read as follows:
Condition 38.e: "The loading area is to be completely
screened from view and/or shall be
located behind commercial building."
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing
the applicant and if there were any concerns.
Mr. Stan Dotts, representing the applicant, commented on
condition number 25.m, pertaining to hydroseeding the
hillside --would like between now and City Council hearing to
get a consultant's opinion on the hydroseeding.
Mr. Dotts questioned condition number 20, pertaining to
mechanical equipment being ground mounted; stated the mansard
roofs are in the rear and not visible to anyone, and this
seems like an ideal place to have the mechanical equipment.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 25.h.,
pertaining to percentages for bonding of landscape
improvements; condition number 20, pertaining to mechanical
equipment being roof mounted if not visible, and height of
parapet wall, amending condition number 20 to reflect the
standard parapet wall condition.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on the grading and whether or
not there would be any cut into the 1:1 slope; Lakeshore Drive
upgrade --would like to see a mechanism, some way to see that
when development is taking place on a major street, like
Lakeshore, that both sides are developed; if this is private
property or the old railroad right-of-way; blue tile roof;
condition number 38.e, pertaining to the loading area being
screened from view, what view?
Chairman Brown commented on flooding along Lakeshore, and the
possibility of the City forming a JV with its lease; if
nothing else, put asphalt berm on the other side --maybe not
curb, gutter and sidewalk. There are three places of ponding
in that stretch. If we are going to do one side and direct
the water to the other side of the street at least try to get
it towards the lake somehow. If we (the City) can participate
in the improvements at that time --not necessarily take
additional right-of-way, which may be years down the line, at
least finish it out to get an even course all the way through
there and at least an AC berm all the way down to the entrance
of both of those projects.
Chairman Brown commented on condition number 25.m, asked if
the intent is for newly created slopes or existing slopes;
amending this condition to reflect "any slopes created by
grading", and deleting the last sentence.
Planning Manager Thornhill requested that condition number 36
be deleted, as it does not apply to this proposal.
Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to recommend to City Council
adoption of Negative Declaration 89-9 and approval of
Commercial Project 89-9 based on the Findings and subject to
AGENDA ITEM NO. ---E
PAGE OF W.
C r
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 4
COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
the 62 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report with
the following amendments:
Condition 20: "All roof mounted equipment shall be
at least six -inches (6") lower than
the parapet wall or top of equipment
well and shall be painted to match
the building. Evidence of compliance
shall be included in building plans."
Condition 25.h: "All landscape improvements shall be
bonded 120% Faithful Performance
Bond, and released at completion of
installation of landscape require-
ments approval/acceptance, and bond
100% for material and labor for one
year."
Condition 25.m: "All slopes created by any grading
shall have a permanent irrigation
system and erosion control vegetation
installed, approved by the Planning
Division."
Condition 36: "Prior to issuance of building
permits, applicant shall pay all fees
required in Conditions of Approval
for ." DELETED
Condition 38.e: "The loading area is to be completely
screened from public right-of-way
view and/or shall be located behind
commercial building."
Second by Commissioner Brinley.
Approved 4-0
6. dustrial Project 90-1 - Ed Carlson (The I.N.O. Associat ,
W t All
- Associate Planner Restivo presented a pro al
to struct an 8,000 square foot industrial building, cated
appro ately 420 feet north of Flint Street, St
of
Chairman Br n asked if there was anyone prese representing
the applicant d if there were any concerns.
Mr. Walt Allen, epresenting the a licant, questioned
condition number 34. pertaining t location of trash
enclosure.
Commissioner Gilensonco to on condition number 34.b.,
pertaining to the location the trash enclosure, and
deleting thiZnumber
f o tion creates no problem with
maneuverabili
Commissioner ented on ndition number 34.b,
pertaining toi-truck) acc , maneuverability,
potential sd, and reloca ' n of the trash
enclosure; cor 34.a, pertainin to the front
elevation win
commissior4orr Saathoff commented on condition nZiVer 34.a,
pertain;vt to the windows of the open work shop to pravide one
conte ous windowed area, and providing somethinmore
spe is on this condition; asked for the number of empty e,
a the possibility of enhancing the landscaping by provide
outside shade area for employees.
AGENDAITEM Nti.E�,._
PAGE OF
r
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
Business Item
C 89-9
February 21, 1990
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED BY: //��T G✓�/O
Gabrielle Restivo Gary Thornhill
Associate PlanneA Planning Manager-�
APPROVED BY
Dev. Dir.
OWNER/APPLICANT
Lakeshore Commercial Partners I, A General Partnership
5749 La Jolla Blvd.
La Jolla, California 92037
USE
Design Review approval of three (3) commercial buildings
totaling 28,770 square feet.
SIZE AND LOCATION
The site contains 4.99 gross acres located approximately 1200
feet east of Main Street, north of Lakeshore Drive.
Assessor's Parcel Number 373-145-003, 004 and 373-291-003.
SETTING
Project Site -
North -
East -
South -
West -
PROJECT AND SITE
EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Vacant C-1 Neighborhood
Commercial and
Environmentally
sensitive
Vacant R-1 Environmentally
Sensitive and
Public/Semi-Public
Residential R-1 Environmentally
Sensitive and
Low Density
Residential
Public Building C -P, Neighborhood
and Vacant R-1 Commercial and
Floodplain/
Floodway
Vacant R-3 Neighborhood
Commercial
The proposal is for three (3) commercial buildings of which
two (2) are 9,443 square feet and one (1) is 9,884 square
feet. The three (3) buildings are situated on the site in a
linear arrangement due to the lot depth/topographic
constraints. Two (2) of the buildings are connected by a
courtyard/dining area, and
AGENDA HEN, I �l --
PAGE b OF ZO
it
Business Item
C 89-9
February 21, 1990
Page 2
possible day care/yard area is proposed to the rear of the
buildings. The three (3) buildings will exhibit mutual
architectural treatment with the materials and colors being
light grey wood siding, dark grey wood trim and blue tile
roofing. The site totals 4.99 gross acres with approximately
2.25 acres of net building area.
The site is generally flat along the Lakeshore Drive frontage
below the 1280 contour level and then crests northerly to a
ridge line at approximately 1434 and 1500 feet. There is an
existing dirt road northerly of the site at approximately the
1350-1380 contour level. The site was previously
graded/disturbed approximately 27 years ago which resulted in
an existing 1:1 maximum, rear yard slope. The proposed
grading plan proposes an eight (8) foot high retaining wall
maximum into the rear 1:1 slope.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND ZONING COMPLIANCE
The General Plan designations for the site are "Neighborhood
Commercial" and "Environmentally Sensitive Areas". The
proposal is generally consistent with the neighborhood
commercial policies which are more or less implemented
through zoning use restrictions. The "Environmentally
Sensitive Areas" designation is given in part, to areas of
steep slopes and/or hillsides. The policies do not preclude
commercial development; however, the project should be
reviewed in terms of possible environmental impacts and
compliance with all elements of the General Plan, including
the Environmental Resources Management Element. Staff
prepared Negative Declaration 89-55 based on the finding that
project impacts could be mitigated to less than significant
levels. Grading impacts were not considered significant due
to the limited eight (8) foot cut into the hillside.
Discussion with Kevin Crew of Butterfield Engineering
indicated that prior disruption/grading of the site took
place 27 years ago, and that the proposed eight (8) foot cut
into the 1:1 slope will be primarily into accumulated soils
at the toe of the original slope. The landscape plan will
include erosion control vegetation. No other "General Plan
Consistency" conflicts are known to exist.
Staff has the following code concerns relative to this
project.
1. Loading areas are visible from the front of the
project ingress/egress points and do not appear to
allow truck maneuverability. Staff recommends that
these loading areas be redesigned or enhanced to
screen views from the project frontage or that
loading areas be placed to the rear of the unit.
Staff will condition the project for screening of
loading areas.
2. The project will be conditioned to require a five (5)
foot minimum landscape buffer between parking area
and property line on the westerly property line. A
minimum five (5) foot landscape planter is required
for all parking stalls that abut one another at an
angle.
3. An additional trash enclosure needs to be provided or
at least one of the two enclosures must be double
receptacle.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE _J. I OF 1d�
Business Item
C 89-9
February 21, 1990
Page 3
4. All parking stalls abutting solid walls or other
structures must be two (2) feet wide.
SPECIAL PROJECT CONCERNS
The Fire Department requires twenty-four (24) foot driveway
entrances. Entrance locations are subject to change pending,
an engineered sight distance study for left -turn egress
motions.
The Design Review Committee (DRC) of the Central Business
District (CBD) met to discuss this proposal because of its
location adjacent to the CBD. Concern over the blue tile was
expressed. Staff has been directed to determine if blue tile
will be consistent with proposed Lake Redevelopment concepts
and the Historical Downtown. Staff will consult with the City
Contract Architect for a determination prior to the Planning
Commission hearing and report the findings at the meeting.
REVIEW
The Environmental Assessment revealed the following potential
environmental impacts:
1. Grading, Soils
2. Drainage
3. Noise
4. Light and Glare
5. Transportation/Circulation
6. Storm drainage
With further review and project conditioning the above
impacts were determined to be less than significant.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to
the City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 89-55 and
approval of Commercial Project 89-9, based on the following
Findings and attached Conditions of Approval.
Findings
1. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, Policies, and
Objectives of the General Plan.
If the attached Conditions are met this project will meet
the design and development standards of Chapters 17.44,
17.38 and 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
3. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result.
AGENDA ITEM NO. —S
PAGEil= OF
OFFICE USE ONLY
Negative Declaration No. 89-55
Project: Catfaercial Project 89-8
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
3
1. Developer or Project:
Contact Person: gtan P_ Dn tv
Address: 5749 Ta hila Blvd -
City: Ta Zip: 92037
Telephone Number: 4S9_1114
2. Environmental Information Prepared by: gran p_ Dntts
Address: =`q TA T na Rlurl
City: ; Zona ra Zip: 92037
Telephone Number: ( r1g ) a _ 14
and C�ty of.Lakte Elsinore Planning Staff - Gabrielle Restivo
3. Propose Pro7ec
Title: Lakeshore Village Center
Location: Lakeshore Drive near East Snore ana 111aln
Total site acreage: Gross: acres apg approx.
For Residential Project:
Number of units:
Dwelling units per acre:
Unit sizes (square feet):
Assessor's Parcel Dhsnbers 373-145-003,004 and _i/.3-291- Uu.�
Attach
- -
Attach brief description of proposed project, including
intended use, and phasing of project, or if present
project is a phase or portion of a larger project.
4. List and describe any other related permits and other
public approvals required for this project, including
those required by local, regional, state, and federal
agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire
department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District.
5. Environmental Setting:
Attach a description of the existing environmental
setting of the project site and surrounding pro-
perties, including information on topography, geo-
logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any
cultural, historical, or scenic aspects.
courercial
ly sensitive
ly sensitive
ublic
ly sensitive
Residential
conriercial
commercial.
AGENDA ITEM NO. V I
PAGE1� OF22--n
GENERAL
EXISTING LAND USE,
ZONING
PLAN
Project site
anaghborhood
Vacant
C-1
Environnenta
Surrounding
Vacant
R-1
Environments
North
and
Public/Semi-
Surrounding
Residential
R-1
Envirormenta
East
and
Low Density
Surrounding
Vacdant
an
C -P
Neighborhood
South
R-1
and
Public building
Floodplain/
Surrounding
Vacant
R-3
Neighborh
West
courercial
ly sensitive
ly sensitive
ublic
ly sensitive
Residential
conriercial
commercial.
AGENDA ITEM NO. V I
PAGE1� OF22--n
'� xl xl xl xl x I xl xl I xl x I I xl
P m H
.I w -GI4 O 1 akl C 0 MT - H - O00 a l w
9 O T9 O G +I O q P 4 m 0 9 M 1 o +I A PN ✓ a .I O
a GOM m9C• U 55G O 4V .1 m U -Vw 9V -1a
O w.IU MV0 0-11-1 M 0. T M .+m M - tlq O .Iq yW yC a0 Oa
0. Y 0 09V 440✓ O O Vw-IPOE ON 4m0 VY
O -tw - pOG m mFm M •.10A GAb Ow L 0 MY✓ b+l N P O L
H M O -I m 6 9 N �1 m 4 m +1 b +. 0 O q G �1 A 4 G✓ N P 4 M P 4 M G N
0. H -.0M1 P M.i 3 9 tl% P N m 'O G d 3 mo % o a -1 4 a L -1 O V c q
oN qm 9a4 0 Am at, 0 OMm PQ19 RV: "" 090E tlA O V tlN P .I .i M 400
m >tlmNY GGY tl0. A Dm.Ic0, 40 _ C9-•�d 4 0 .IM .10 .I 4 N.iM
A +I V PG 0Bw 4 w MO V -1A a U4 N m N -I N> Om O -I P.> .I "13 tlAN
Y CG d tH0 w 00 UM OEE9 O A U w0NO Vw N % 00 dY 3m Ltl V
.i OCIMP• Vo OIVV 4U I egg Mu VO W� OGLE GN 4 aN O,~ 300 C ✓ 000
Y M4 U P•� 0 c 9F -4 04c 9" 3 Y M �•aiMt O �m O~ 90 M•�1 A ••GIS w 0 ww d V
to
~aa00 -01 +1N 0G~�d '•0V m ~b aC WC b +Oia db y a�+OIO ON N N.01 MC Om 0w 3 • C0b
aM1 O m0 -0• VC v a A 9 M Vv M•• 00 Vol V V TP.I VO .Vl MO +I .. 9 P o -19 4 aMP
w9 009 a4 UO•O O•I tl-I UU -IC P+I �•I -1 -U U9 Ga GC.Iq q N 3 G 00 a N V -I v N F V 4
.I-1 GUUa P d H49.IU P-1 F7 -1 GQQ•tlVAd 744E M0PME 0A +1 Hm pOp,,M qAN 9.+d o+1 a U
a✓ L66MG acw Cw9od mP .-1V A0.0.q 0NG OwGG Cw m_n� U" V GO %N UO✓9 �mtl ?Y UA
C; UmmV6 y[9P HO-IMo xa qEy UO a.I Nw-i moon FIOH64 0w m7 HC W0 .]33 C.pO.T 0 mV.l
b a a PO C a
.Id
O GGM
d +INH qq
RH tl A U b ;LH m A U 00.0 .1Md tl
x{ x l x l x l I xl x l x l x l x l xl x I
coco
� xl I I I I xl l I I I I I I
a V H o I
0 V C 1 V DV P L V G m 0 -.M O t N V N 1
AV N M0 C L +1 0 VM -.I V U d d 1 -1b w Po Mo O
V P 9.q1 O a - a 9 3 N 9 0 o at, �� V 0 1 0 0 D 9 P w G m 0 N P
3td ME V vM -M1 H 0O a MY N PH 03 00 7M G 00 T OOH x 9 4'to 9 ..
V N a9 U >P0 T .I O C P Oa 0✓HA0 d MH V +IA 0'C c� H0.O O
q a d OY✓N a M ONm QV VT 9.10 O.P -IP - MVV 4Q. 00 U OV O
Gw .1 +IwI moo.i 0 McM -10 - 4 r.c w4V -ET 0 Y0•1 H -1A-1 a0 V 0
.moi D 0 0 G O M O - c P. CMV ✓pp,,M o A 3 0, O T3 GV O 00 0vv 00 9 UUA •al oW G >qq
ml 0 O tl✓-I n. H G V'O'.A a G +I A +1 9 > P P Q.N P fl
Ga 4 HO w aEU-H N HU 00 ON✓ O 4-1 cd'O-•0 V3 �o -w9 bM4 O ar. a
O a O .Iw O a P P. M 0 N 0 m G D O O U P O M O V M O U 0 0 0 H a M M O
UN H9V wVGO PNCM AVO, -VI dM VCM.1V>N w dbu. X M✓M 0.0 0 0 O
N C O MM 9 U -I -1V 4YOw H Ao C-IwU .I>• Ow AN oa 90 40 VA> 0 0
CXV 6 9
a 0G .INT ON M A O 4 a Ew m
VV +1 MC•00✓ V d N3 O .13w w 4Uq N
+I 0 0 9OV -1a comM V C -3 9490 CW 4 MP+IOa-i Gw Y -1a -•IH 4 0373 0 W
V 9 U A .I .++1 V H w Po .INm -1 G 00 GS d Oa -V 0•�O M0 -41UM P. Vol. o0 M1 O M
UMM Y VN.1 90 tlC N OVA d•OO ti ti P.w TE•OA ✓d AAOb G Ao MV mq N 9
E.Q.
d 9 0 9 0'6 Vu 0 T .1 b F a 0 9 0 Y 3 0 N
Mao N VV, NO 9PA.1 +I Como dqa 90 da 9bOV+1 H 4Vn• O'OPVUY 9Vq-1 P 'O'O d
V0 .I Vto U M✓U•I 3 Pa EH PC M M'.i P9r• AN M.�-P HAW PCP -IMO Y9•yN bTN+1 'O T
a0.-- -+ a 0 0a a aHOw C -10d 0W GwT UocH 0V 0Ho CP0300 aP-10. OV 0V O 1
CDO 3 A H a.l ✓+ITU 9P> 94VY Y 9N'O aYOM✓M V V qON Y UE>7 kON]NaN .01 O
A N 9 M .i H A P O -1 4-•I O P H .i N q L N A M C T
Um•-• moo Fa 494.1 N UOEO UNM3 40 UMA 03V O'CYO 403 UPY O -IA mmaa W0.G0 W .I
m
C YN
A
4-t
ry �
.. ✓ a P .I
P✓111 Hp
0 0 9 4 c U w G O V
+Gi O -LVN �0w M 0 G -O PEO WG
1 N MY a-•1
W.M.
O 4 O > MYa pgA 0Y.1'.IN E
.1 wFNO 99M .IY TM -1d>9 C'O
0 Y -•10M ON 0'OE 46000 0k0
w 0P Cm -G, UCti A = mMV 0 9-1
A D Y 6 > m
U -n „OICV N >b.�0 .ViOMV Ogg > GY
Mo
4 pN M t g NOC 3-•Nlo, MOO 000
V OV Ma V 000
9 '>O-0 C -1 'O>=ACmw-I 4mV
Y wU OO cM 0.1w 3003 9.00-wIG 9M7
00 4M -.i0 wM> 0 TPG CW OVM
•.1 .1- 90V P -I.I C
gN +i MU•1G V m 0
0 YO O a~ 0 004 d�•41.O a -I MM 0 0 CU
G A4 EPN MA NV0m>l fi0
O P A. PVG•X090.1 - a
4 o dV M OC 00UH0H.1V O 4
9 MA MaP .900• A✓0V 0.a 0'O WCV
0 V PTC✓ 0P -IU OAVO YM G-IC9
M a a 1 O M ✓ V .I 4 U 4 A a w o N +i d d
0T 9 9•y OPg0 .I VAHM� 0✓9
A 0 A 0 H P 0. C .1 9 o m 9 Y
ZO
U U 19.1 - 0-1P - AC90✓ ✓ AUO.i
p U9 q.IUP N•OM0 m-'°gtlN"eM 0 VN16
Y pa 60 CC 4I�M-
B
✓ ✓ M-•Iv N ✓LY4NO>d
4 M U U 9 N U l a m 0 0 m M 6 V m N O C
M
9 d V 0- M G H M m +I Y M H -I d O.ti w P. M M
u y>YL A-toH F .I0 6 T G aMHA
C O O G -o U. ✓ 0.A U X 9
O M N 9 m M O- P 4 U d .I N a a0.• O O 4'O
••I 4 a -� - M m P a 4 O N A d 4 ✓HFI U G •+
Y 3 c a O m T a G 9 MVI > E U 9 W H m O 0
4 00 CRN C GH --1 FI 0 4.1V O UMO
0.1 g0Mti w N✓ mm 0a0-
A p 4 N .' a 4 Pw H C M a u M a a m
4 M a O 'O Y o g V 4 4 G 9 O L PMN U N M
m
MO A d 9 A M✓> H Y W b m N .0 00.0
9 -10 0 au 'A", Z 3 b LP04R ✓ MOY
OM N> O C N n N W O b 0 a 6 a
0
U U V U .y R a UCti 6 N C 0 Y M M +, m
T
VQ a U 4 N d w 9 O O O, Y C F E V .1V 4 0 . 4
P D4 0660 QVw✓ O'. waUO 9U anm-N
N H
l"
g"MU
0 0> R a .-I C✓ 9 0. 4 6 0 0
L A -n E m+1 -•I M a q •-1 O N 4
W 4
to U W HD-IH3V CEFI WUgM
N N
✓ N 0 a
1 T > d
H Oyy 1 MP E
0 NO q -IA N 1 1 •O
b ma V G P U d 00.EMV O OMV•ON
d c 0 F .N G +I ✓ N O M 0 C C M
u 0 a
N O d N N +I b H -+I o -v 0.N M P
-1U EO O NTT Omm b U 00 q•109
N Y -•I 0> W 0=A .I GV w N HN NA
q w P UO TO > 44 9-10 OC 9A 099 09 -P
b 90 m0 A-, O 9 0 A -1003 0-I Aa N
O 9N IN 4.1 Uwu -,MV vmM .-1A aa -o
P. 00 0.d am 00 3 ✓ C a - low+
M ow a> N H w w 040
O 9 0
.10 P 9 CU Co. O UV•1CA M OP 9 E
0, A 9 00 OO•1 -1 O 0.0.I04VA too
VC N RU -I-IP C Nm-NOA 4•I4.1,
d N •1 - O N PC ✓ V D w o M 9 A M M U H T O V m
A 9 M1 b .I Vva Dal m-10 OOG w0 N91
y Y00 C9 -I H 9U0 9b 9 w 9 0 p OPb P(
am 000 9Pr••I dC• moo -10-IN4E we
.I m P N +I -1 a -i M b Y w P b N N O O V o N m o
.I •-I 9 P VV a M -I 0 Do M C a d o N✓ M - C
-I AM✓ "UM o'ON d'OaN 9 H dOm9TN P 401
'j
0=0 O a A CMcz P y `0 6 9,0 ~ N a P'ti P O w y G r. a T 0.
•� oA Ga C+1 +1mod OyAV.
m U O m E 9 0 a d 4 T✓ V 0 O 4 V 9 0 .x 4 N U w -.
GG✓ -a Ow AN0 ANCA G0+ ANA -10 kq OP.ia
000 UPw HO Pw 430 u 00600.1 W4a a�
N ,
AGENDA ITEM NO.
~ PAGE OF
O
xi x1 x ( x1 x
I I I
, F o, OHUmmw 00P,w 0
00 0
m
HLdNtl
N O
g w q U m O O g 0 0 U m O Y d
40 To NO w N.1Y mm L O+1 NmCO
s oti .,FOO .-100-o .103E
L avo q0 Y q.1YLY q7L✓ qOL✓
Y B F Fa w a O N 00p.a u U•� 0 a U d O M Y U
.~i F0'✓ U O'HYLti DaW OV 0030 N0 mN6
+1q q N HdUHm N mUb H✓
3 Hd 7 0.Y5o ad -i a dti7 aHd
GOH O .1 r. 0U H
~T0 PaF
qO.i •-I tF'
0A+OLd✓YFN s+0>
0H6 YHYmUYGU
. AO OP VL.OU.
YYVC
� VO V,m N .-IY ✓O GYL.10 and dR N0Ha
YmoFd 0 N Co. '1 Nd+.l dYNWH ."1-NUY
FAM0 tiG 0 H am 00 N%m 0
{mIH�WH V 2+.YAd S-.q"AO a"U qY 30ma
{[ 0Y dY u E A O
m O
.1 tV
xlxlxl xI x1 xl xI xI xIxix IxlxI x x
III I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
3
Y+N3+�I•1 YwOa0F 3wWHd~•✓-GE'cO, L✓w'0•L. •' N -.a+ NU0 .♦ NH0H +.01' I •74iNti.ti01 N Yq U 3•• ✓7Hd 9.Ol Td-.OH♦NW .1 mHM.H✓i-NP•1. RHi YT0U
Ytl0H
qYtl .qmNUqj tY10 bY+mN1 ✓m0H3• wY0d ti+00.
O3HNmi 4
Y.+"a.3U.+-I.I tl0H
00a 1 bO N LY_ •1 0.
L O O
YaU-O HUa1C0md
.~�TU9NO♦II
L -C
aRG LdL 0L U>~Y�
.UORAV 00. Y
0
4L L
U F C0✓ m Fd G "a WRH
0, qF tiWCOa H +dGLC
Y d d OU ✓ O O RL
F G 0 H b C N Cq d H d aWL O✓ YY
00 Y Y OwL OH00O
d 0> G 0 O O U U a0Y0 3
U 0 0 H a C 0 dN 7 LY 06 L>
O m
> O a aw 6 q0Y Y
UAHG
d Yd b U O mtl V. H-•1 F 00 YFU+IO
ma O N O N H B '�O am 40.10 Od .UI +GICO..i q:
W. '000 d •1 O •0 0> M 0W m0'�G �ti mY 3 Y 3 MO ,y SN 0N0P O dYU 0m0�'
ROaa a 4 .i L NO ..0 0 L H
U m aYUN -•� O U q.l 400 Y a >.Y 0w 00dW YY 6 m O O q 0 Y O H00 G
+.O a-. -titl W W W O•V RwH 00 Ha 7o m`Om HO ti7Y F0� W U 3 W W N bb ULLM Wa L7mVP•Cc
N 4 H q m N M b m N d0 b T 00-
P Fq YO T✓•'I 70 A .I♦
00GOH
L N H H 0 G
4 0 0 m ti q A U 'O 0 w W N q A p H m g Y q A U b a w z a q 4 H R✓ aY c
� N
m
ti
xl x l x1 x l x l x l I I I I x I I
I I I I I I I I I x I I A
R I I I I 1 I I xi xi I x I I I
0 ✓+� I .i .1 1 m N
0 H 7 Y R g 1 0 G q 0 a 1 0 m G
01` 4N OMAN-NG1 0A0 G Nq
PH'O L Hm O0 0 7 0'q q-1 OAR .1HO C NO HR L00 C YO Uti
-IOW Y OU H 0 LO `40 •O 0.•I Hw 40.1 F+. Y6 as a+1 dYN H A✓
d -d d7 ON m Ob •O.MG `HOO NNLN O `ti +01Y AH •0 0vow
9R9 +. 6b ✓L V `q pOp,,N'0 +.0✓U abi+0 OL•O go mNy .1 CH ✓q d•iO VH M>q
G 10Y 3 HM ma .w Ca %AUO.-mw 0i ✓�U`9 aOM UM Ip. 0 00NOOK 60. 4Ma 3q 400.
dA
L3a0o Y NH..�1 Y ✓tl .q♦dN d G O mG �0d U 0 O> dG�•�1X NGqH
m wU YO'O YN .O1 �✓G
0
Vq 0�✓U0 .07 LLw wd 0Y0
yO V, 0
oz 0
go 0 tlY6L CF CO Oq wy
L w Y 0 OD. 00 O
Gm HYP6PYO
'•1 Nr. d b
Y `mw O m dG ✓ H a 0> 00 U+.UG✓ ti0 +.G
MCnO RH qT 600 0.I Pm+gi XdRB `�dN C~mE 3+1 'O qR q"1 ✓qd q..6 400quo .-i
nwL-Yn.UnmC (>H; qO r0HlGtl0 YNFOaN q0H b✓HYm.✓Gi'bOU^Y 'Otl1YmG +.0t.G0H C0`LL7 r• tidU ✓0NN Mb 1H9✓4N6 WUw+P1WCH YNm'Y•.dm
✓H✓d00'0
L LO%
Om O L0OU O %THGO YH0
..q P 00Y 0.. U1 0 CYaF 0.✓ dvam 09 4AaNwYRH HaUFL
OR Od Om L>
O a6 4HNtlAU{••i
X P.7 a F Y tl m a g m G .1
Y O 0 O O .Y+ w H O w H O
"�H 40✓OR .1•gUL F3 q A U
A 2 0. a A K Q. q A
AGENDA ITEM NO, r
PAGE L OF
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
I. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
II.
YES MAYBE NO
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wild-
life population to drop below
self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory? _
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental
goals? _
C. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative
declaration to be issued.
The proposed project should not have a significant
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration
will be prepared.
Although the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant effect on the environment, it will not in this
case because of the attached mitigation measures.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
The proposed project may have a significant effect
on the environment. An EIR is required.,
III. REVIEWED BY: Gabrielle Restivo DATE: 2/16/90
PLANNING DIRECTOR: ' DATE: -),,j /6 � qi"
AGENDA ITEM ,N, O. i l
/o
PAGE llOFA/
r r
ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED
The site is generally flat along the Lakeshore Drive frontage
below the 1280 contour level, then crests northerly to ridge
lines at approximately 1434 and 1500 feet. There is an
existing dirt road northerly at approximately 1350-1380 feet.
The site is linear between Mountain and Lakeshore Drive and
totals approximately 4.99 gross acres. The soils are shown
by the Riverside County Soils Survey to be predominantly WxD2
and TbF2, with a limited amount LKF3:
WxD2-8 to 15% slopes eroded - fine sandy loam and
brown loam subsoil. Run-off is medium and erosion
hazards are moderate, shrink swell potential is
moderate with severe septic limitations.
LKF3-15 to 50% slopes - severely eroded, Las Posas
rocky loam - well drained soils developed on Gabbro
and other intrusive igneous rock. Only 15-20 inches
to weathered gabbro with a red subsoil.
Rockoutcrops are on 2 to 10% of the surface. Run-off
is rapid and erosion hazard high. Fertility is low.
Shrink swell potential is high with severe septic
limitations.
TbF2 - Temescal Rocky Loam 15 to 50% slopes eroded -
occurs on uplands. Rockoutcrops cover 2 to 10% of
the site. Permeability is moderate. Surface layer
is grayish brown and brown loam almost 17 inches
deep. It is underlain by light yellowish brown,
partly weathered and fractured latite-porphyry.
high run-off potential and erosion hazard, slow
infiltration rate. Moderate shrink swell potential
and severe septic tank limitations.
Grading activity took place on the site approximately 27
years ago with cuts into the hillside. Finished slopes at
that time did not exceed a 1:1 ratio.
The vegetation is generally sparse weedy species and brush.
There is no known biological, cultural or historic
significance to the site.
Geologic Impacts
1. a -h. The site was graded approximately 27 years ago for
an ending hillside ratio of a 1:1 maximum slope with
flatter areas southerly of the hill. Over the years
surface layers have naturally sloughed off and
collected at the toe of the slope. The proposed cut
into the hillside will be mainly into the debris
area of the hill with a limited cut into the hill
for a retaining wall. The total vertical cut will
be approximately 8 feet high (8 foot high retaining
wall). The remainder of the 1:1 hillside slope is
not proposed to be disturbed. The total cut
proposed is 3,000 cubic yards and total fill is
13,350 cubic yards or a net import of 10,350 cubic
yards. A Geotechnical Study and associated
recommendations will be required prior to issuance
of grading permits for this site. Erosion control
landscaping will be required for the site. No more
cut than shown on the preliminary grading plan will
be allowed into the previous graded 1:1 maximum
slope. Generally that would preclude grading above
the 1291 contour level.
Soil amendments for landscaping will be per an
agronomic report submitted with final landscape
plans. No significant impacts are anticipated.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF
r C
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM CONTINUED - PAGE 2
3.b & There will be increased drainage flows to Lakeshore
16.e. Drive. A hydrology/hydraulic report will be
required prior to issuance of building permits to
insure existing storm drainage facilities are
adequate. Bonding for any necessary improvements
prior to building permit will be required. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
6.a. The proposed development will increase noise levels
due to the increased traffic and commercial
activity. The area, however, is designated for
commercial uses and cannot be considered a noise
sensitive use. General construction activity is
required to meet the requirements of the Noise
Ordinance as implemented through the City's code
enforcement program. No significant impact is
anticipated.
7. The proposed 3 building, 31,500 square foot
commercial center will increase light and glare.
General light standards and wall lights will be
required to be shielded above the horizontal plane.
No significant environmental impacts are
anticipated.
13.a.b. The proposed development could generate 3,714
c.d.f. average daily trips according to the Institute of
Transportation Engineers traffic generation
handbook, based on a ratio of 117.9 average daily
trips per 1,000 square feet of leasable area. The
leasable area proposed is 31,500. The site is
located approximately 313 feet from "Short" Street,
which is a curved road connecting Main Street and
Lakeshore Drive. Sight distance may create a
problem for left turn movements. Engineer
verification of sight distance/entry way locations
will have to be verified prior to approval of the
final site plan for building permits. A pro rata
share fee for signalization of Lakeshore Drive and
Limited (the intersection at Short Street, and
Lakeshore Drive) will be required. No significant
environmental impacts are anticipated.
REFERENCES/RESOURCES
Prepared by: Gabrielle Restivo, Associate Planner
Consulted: Ray O'Donnell, Senior Civil Engineer
Kevin Crew, Butterfield Engineering
References: Soils Survey of Western Riverside County
ITE - Traffic Generation Book
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF
Q
I
b
1
r
r
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 t
PAGE OFE
a_
CNESNUi 3 ST.
Y
?'' �a. ,— �— oolo `� /K— �. ,i• j w h �• - i so i •s' m IT��io'
611
I I
a i \ >•
/ 10,
1 \� E DE \ M s,• I ,s• �o i rosm
�::1
4 / o � >a. •e• h ince
g9'
04
- 01-
(j
(j 67,
ii 16 N
Zr Z&'
bd
pc
Sera' MS 63/ F
v. m
t�
t' t
Z
O
0
O AGENDA ITEM
]j NO.
PACE ICS -OF
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Industrial Project 90-1: Ed Carlson;
a request to construct an 8,000
square foot industrial building on a
.41 acre site, located approximately
420 feet north of Flint Street, west
of Langstaff.
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED BY
Gabrielle Restivo Dave nderman
Associate Planner Comm.Cpev. Dir.
APPROVED BY:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
At the meeting of February 21, 1990, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of Industrial Project 90-1 by a 4-0
vote, Commissioner Wilsey absent (minutes and staff report
attached). The location of the trash enclosure was discussed
relative to the loading area, and the front elevation windows
were discussed. Conditions were revised to allow the trash
enclosure to remain where proposed and to elongate and
consolidate the windows in the "open workshop area". The
industrial building is to be split -face masonry block with a
beige stucco finish and rust colored trim. Office entrance
and window glass is to be clear with dark mullions, the
multi -textured split -face masonry block will be exposed in
bands to provide architectural variations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative
Declaration 90-1, and approve Industrial Project 90-1 based
on the findings and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings:
This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan.
2. No environmental impacts will result from this project.
If the attached conditions are met, this project
the design directives of Chapters 17.38, 17
2 and 17.66 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
meet
17.8
will
.56,
AGENDA ITEM, NO. ('
PAGE OF ��
r
r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1
Planning Division
1. Design Review Approval for Industrial Project 90-1 will lapse
and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1)
year from the date of City Council approval.
2. Design review approval will lapse and be void unless building
permits are issued within one (1) year. An extension of time,
up to one (1) year per extension, may be granted by the
Planning Commission prior to the expiration of the initial
Design Review approval upon application by the developer one
(1) month prior to expiration.
3. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented within
the project design in all phases and/or adhered to strictly.
4. These Conditions of Approval shall be attached or reproduced
upon Page One of building plans prior to their acceptance by
the Division of Building and Safety.
5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the
approved plot plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site
plans or building elevations shall be subject to Design Review.
All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall
conform with the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of
Approval, or the Planning Commission through subsequent action.
6. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be
used unless modified by the Community Development Director or
his designee.
7. A revised site plan and elevation plan shall be submitted to
the Planning and Building Departments by the applicant prior to
Building Division issuance of permits which reflects all
conditions of approval. These revised plans shall become the
approved plot plan only upon the review and approval by the
Community Development Director or his designee.
8. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utili-
ties.
9. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's
Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion
shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of
Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques.
Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days
after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer.
10. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject to
the approval of the Chief Building Official. The Grading Plan
must meet the requirements of Chapter 16.54 of the Municipal
Code, Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.
11. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
12. Meet all State handicap requirements.
13. Meet all Riverside County Health Department requirements.
14. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
15. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as
approved by the Community Development Director.
16. No roof ladders shall be permitted.
17. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire
rating.
AGENDA ITEM NO.�
PAGE �L_ OF -IL—
-- --
r
OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1 CONTINUED
18. The design and construction of the project shall meet all
County Fire Department standards for fire protection and shall
include emergency vehicle turning radius, and fire resistance
requirements for all buildings including sprinklers where
required, and any additional requirements requested by the Fire
Safety Specialist. A fire detector check assembly shall be
required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. A letter
shall be submitted verifying compliance prior to issuance of
building permits.
19. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or
other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be
screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property
or public streets.
20. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six -inches (611)
lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well and shall
be painted to match the building. Evidence of compliance shall
be included in building plans.
21. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the building.
22. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the
center's design theme. Mailboxes shall be submitted for
approval prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the
approval of the postal service and the Community Development
Director or his designee.
23. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and
approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for a
$100.00 per plan fee, and the Community Development Director or
his designee.
a) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (611) high and six-inch (611)
wide concrete curb.
b) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress
points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches
(36").
c) The Landscape plan shall provide for ground cover,
shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the
City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
d) Landscape planters shall include an appropriate
parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking
lot shading in fifteen years.
e) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and
screened as part of the landscaping plan.
f) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion
of installation of landscape requirements
approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and
g) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
within affected portion of any phase at the time a
Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any
building.
h) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved
site plan.
i) Evergreen trees at least thirty (30) feet on center
must be planted in planter adjacent to residential
usage. L
AGENDA ITEM NO. � � %;'a/- %a PC
PAGE OF� --
r
OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1
24. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (31) in height shall
have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control
vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division.
25. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed
on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and
streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the
fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the
architecture of the building. No wall park units shall be
permitted. .
26. Any security lighting located on-site shall be ornamental and
shall be shown on building plans, subject to the approval of
the Community Development Director or his designee.
27. All signage shall be by City Permit.
28. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of
the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and
shall incorporate all district conditions and standards.
29. Parking stalls shall be double -striped with four -inch (411)
lines two -feet (21) apart.
30. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping
and shall meet City Standards for loading zones.
31. A six-foot (61) high masonry wall shall be constructed along
the southerly property lines and shall conform to Section
17.14.080 (Fences and Walls), subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
32. Trailers utilized during construction shall be approved by
Planning Division.
33. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
34. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits,
the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of
Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
a) The front elevation windows of the "open work shop
area" shall be lengthened and consolidated to provide
for a larger window expanse similar to the
architecture of the rest of the building. This can
be done through plant -ons or pane windows.
b) The trash enclosure shall be located as per Exhibit
1. The trash enclosure shall be so located to allow
truck maneuverability in the loading area.
c) The front yard building and parking setback shall
average twenty (20) feet but not be less than fifteen
(15) feet.
Enaineerina Department:
35. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued.
36. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code,
Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from
the Engineering Department.
37. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.20).
AGENDA ITEM NO. �jOf v..
PAGE OFIL_
A
r
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1 CONTINUED
38. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26).
39. Submit a "Will -Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water district, stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project.
Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
40. Construct all off-site public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of
building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
41. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared
by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and
constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards,
latest edition, and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
12.04 and 16.34).
42. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12,
Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78).
All fees and requirements for encroachment permit shall be
fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
43. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie -notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar)
shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final
inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
44. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage
acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
45. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through
site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved
by the City Engineer.
46. Post required Labor and Material Bond and Performance Bond for
Public Work Improvements off-site.
47. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for
off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to
issuance of grading permits.
48. Contribute $41.00 towards the City's Master Entryway Sign
Program.
49. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by
Riverside County Fire protection.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE — OF,
r C
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 4
COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-9 CONTINUED
62 Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report w
following amendments:
20: "All roof mounted equipment shall
at least six -inches (6") lower an
the parapet wall or top o/gp1lans. ent
well and shall be paintedtch
the building. Evidence ofnceshall be included in build"
Condition
25.h: "All landscape improveents shall be
bonded 120% Faithf Performance
ond, and release at completion of
i tallation of andscape require -
men s approval/ ceptance, and bond
100% for mat Val and labor for one
year.'
Condition
25.m: "All sl s created by any grading
shall av a permanent irrigation
syste and a sion control vegetation
ins lled, app oved by the Planning
D' ision."
Condition
36: "Prior to issu ce of building
permits, applicant s 11 pay all fees
required in Conditi s of Approval
for " DELE D
Conditio
38.e: "The loading area is to be ompletely
screened from public rI t -of -way
view and/or shall be locate behind
commercial building."
Commissioner Brinley.
4-0
6. Industrial Project 90-1 - Ed Carlson (The I.N.O. Associates,
Walt Allen) - Associate Planner Restivo presented a proposal
to construct an 8,000 square foot industrial building, located
approximately 420 feet north of Flint Street, west of
Langstaff.
Chairman Brown asked if there was anyone present representing
the applicant and if there were any concerns.
Mr. Walt Allen, representing the applicant, questioned
condition number 34.b, pertaining to location of trash
enclosure.
Commissioner Gilenson commented on condition number 34.b.,
pertaining to the location of the trash enclosure, and
deleting this condition if relocation creates no problem with
maneuverability.
Commissioner Brinley commented on condition number 34.b,
pertaining to vehicle (semi -truck) access, maneuverability,
potential safety hazard, and relocation of the trash
enclosure; condition number 34.a, pertaining to the front
elevation windows.
Commissioner Saathoff commented on condition number 34.a,
pertaining to the windows of the open work shop to provide one
continuous windowed area, and providing something more
specific on this condition; asked for the number of employee,
and the possibility of enhancing the landscaping by providing
an outside shade area for employees.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF LP
r r
Minutes of Planning Commission
February 21, 1990
Page 5
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1 CONTINUED
Mr. Carlson responded that there would be five employees.
Chairman Brown commented on condition number 34.b, pertaining
to the location of trash enclosure and truck maneuverability
condition number 34.a, pertaining to window treatment and
suggested continuance of windows through a false window
treatment or something of that nature.
Motion by Commissioner Brinley to recommend to City Council
adoption of Negative Declaration 90-1 and approval of
Industrial Project 90-1 based on the Findings and subject to
the 49 Condition of Approval listed in the Staff Report with
the following amendments:
Condition 34.a: "The front elevation windows of the
"open work shop area" shall be
lengthened and consolidated to
provide for a larger window expanse
similar to the architecture of the
rest of the building. This can be
done through plant -ons or pane
windows."
Condition 34.b: "The trash enclosure shall be located
as per Exhibit 1. The trash
enclosure shall be so located to
allow truck maneuverability in the
loading area."
Second by Commissioner Saathoff.
Approved 4-0
At this time, 8:12 P.M. the Commission recessed.
At this time, 8:25 p.m. the Commission reconvened.
7. Sonter Identification Sign for Firestone Plaza - Joyce Sehi
As 'stant Planner Fairbanks presented a request to const ct
an i ernally illuminated center identification sign, 2 feet
tall an 12 feet wide with 116.5 square feet of si face,
located a roximately 500 feet southeast of the i ersection
of Railroad nyon Road and Casino Drive.
Assistant Planne Fairbanks stated that sta recommends that
the center identifi ion sign, if approve , not exceed the
height of the 17 feet n inches with t sign face limited to
96 square feet of sign cc per side, d moved back 5 feet
from the property line.
Chairman Brown asked if there anyone present representing
the applicant and if there w e any oncerns.
Ms. Sehi stated that t were in agree nt with staff recom-
mendation.
A brief discuss' was held on perception from a street and
setback.
Motion WOF Commissioner Saathoff to approve the Ne.
Identif' ation Sign for Firestone Plaza based on the Fina
and bject to the 7 Conditions of Approval listed in
St Report, second by Commissioner Gilenson.
U!fproved 3-1 (Commissioner Brinley voting no)
AGENDA ITEM NO. i�
PACE OF
A
PLANNING DIVISION
REPORT TO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Public Hearing
I 90-1
February 21, 1990
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED BY:
Gabrielle Restivo Gary Thornhill
Associate Planner Planning Manager
APPROVED BY:
Dav# Gunderman
CotP. Dev. Dir.
OWNER/APPLICANT
Ed Carlson
Post Office Box 6489
Canyon Lake, California 92380
REQUESTED USE
Design review approval of an 8,000 square foot industrial
building.
SIZE AND LOCATION
The site is .41 acres and is located approximately 420 feet
north of Flint Street, west of Langstaff. Assessor's Parcel
Number 377-231-026,027.
ENVIRONMENTAL _SETTING
EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Project Site - Vacant M-1 Limited Industrial/
Floodway/Floodplain
North - City of Lake Elsinore M-1 Limited Industrial/
Public Works Yard Floodway/Floodplain
East - Vacant M-1 Floodway Bridge and
Floodway/Floodplain
South, - Single -Family dwelling M-1 Limited Industrial
West - Vacant M-1 Environmentally
Sensitive
PROJECT,DESCRIPTION
The proposal is for an 8,000 square foot industrial
building. The site is approximately one-half acre and is
located 420 feet north of Flint Street, west of Langstaff.
The site is generally flat with approximately 45 feet of
frontage- in the 100 year floodplain. The proposed building
is to be split -face masonry block with beige stucco finish
and rust colored trim. Store front and window glass is clear
with dark mullions.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND ZONING
The current General Plan designation for the site is limited
industrial. The proposal is consistent with this
designation. However, the proposed 1990 General Plan
Revision is recommending that the site be designated high —�
AGENDA ITEM NO. �__—
PAGE U OF
Public Hearing
I 90-1
February 21, 1990
Page 2
density residential due to its proximity to the downtown area
and to the proposed river walk along the Temescal Wash. The
current General Plan, however, permits this use, and the
proposed revision has not been approved. Should the
surrounding area become high density residential, only a
limited amount of associated impacts would be probable i.e.,
heavy trucks in a residential area. The proposed industrial,
building is relatively small, however, and heavy truck
traffic is not likely and/or can not be determined at this
time.
The site meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements with the
exception of the minimum fifteen (15) foot, average twenty
(20) foot, front yard setback which, will be conditioned for
the project. Staff recommends that the trash enclosure be
relocated to provide a greater area for "loading area"
maneuverability.
Staff also recommends that the front elevation windows be one
(1) long continuous window to mitigate the industrial
character of the building, in keeping with the potential
future change from industrial to residential use for the
area. Likewise, a combination of split face multi -textured
block with areas of stucco finish and the proposed trim color
will add visual variation to the elevation. These
recommendations are consistent with the intent of the Design
Review Ordinance, Chapter 17.82, and the Non -Residential
Development Ordinance, Chapter 17.38, which encourages
residential and commercial architectural elements in
industrial buildings. A minimum six (6) foot high masonry
wall will be required adjacent to the residential use and
evergreen trees spaced thirty (30) feet on center will be
required for the planter area.
i
Negative Declaration 90-1 was prepared for this project based
on the finding that environmental impacts could be mitigated
to less than significant levels.
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to
the City Council adoption of Negative Declaration 90-1 and
approval of Industrial Project 90-1, based on the following
findings and attached Conditions of Approval.
Findings
1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the current General Plan.
2. No environmental impacts will result from this project.
3. If the attached conditions are met this project will meet
the design directives of Chapters 17.38, 17.56, 17.82 and
17.66 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9;L
PAGE OF ) (P
r r
OFFICE USE ONLY
Negative Declaration No. 90-1
Project: industrial Project 90-1
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ASSESSMENT FORM
1. Developer or Project:
Contact Person: Ed Carlson
Address x 6469
City: carryon Lake, CA Zip:
2. Environmental Information Prepared by: The I.N.O. Associates
Address: 27393 Ynex Road, Suite 260
City: Tenecuia, CA Zip: 92390
Telephone Number: ( )
Proposed Project
Title: ISC
Location: Lan
Lots 15 anTT7,—B10—r_
Total site acreage: Gross: Net: 0.41 acre
For Residential Project: N A
Number of units:
Dwelling units per acre:
Unit sizes (square feet):
Attach brief description of proposed project, including
intended use, and phasing of project, or if present
project is a phase or portion of a larger project.
List and describe any other related permits and other
public approvals required for this project, including
those required by local, regional, state, and federal
agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire
department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District.
5. Environmental Setting:
Attach a description of the existing environmental
setting of the project site and surrounding pro-
perties, including information on topography, geo-
logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any
cultural, historical, or scenic aspects.
istrial
nge
:st rial
Inge
Inge and
'loodway
astrial
ally
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE J..._j�(�—
GENERAL
EXISTING LAND USE.
ZONING
PLAN
Project site
Vacant
14-1
Limited INd
Floodway Fr'
Surrounding
City of Lake Elsinore
11-1
Limited Ind
North
Maintenance Yard
Floodway Fr
Surrounding
Vacant
14-1
Floodway F
East
Floodplain/
Surrounding
Residential
M-1
Limited ind
South
Surrounding
Vacant
m-1
Envirornen
West
Sensitive
istrial
nge
:st rial
Inge
Inge and
'loodway
astrial
ally
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE J..._j�(�—
P-
H w Q. O 10 m F C
e 0 T9 O O 4
04 P tl • 09 0 1 0 ti L Pr•
a G7N etlh U G O tl9 N m U -Yw cY +10 N O
O T 4 H U N 9 0 O- U .1 w 6 T N N m N a 9 0 .1 a C H tl
4 Y U a9✓ 4a Ov O O �w.1 Pda OH Moo YY OW ay 0 99
A d G Waco N O A F A m O w m H Y Y m ti .1 P O L A O a*
H m0-Im 6 q N •+ e 6 MW
.1 m.1 O e c •.1A e c Yr• ma Y P 4 • C h
P. H -mo- DHH 3a0m P HW 9 c 0 3 4o %4 m +1 0 9 '•1 0 v 9 0
o ff a W 9 0 0. 0 L a a h a 0 H a 0 9 o 9 v o 0 9 0 E 0 L O Y a .1 .I W H H H 040
O >0a4Y cCY a4 A >yd.a.19P 40 Cetia 4 0Ha HO
V b d G P 9 L M a w a a a U lUi Y 0 9 E C e 0 A H U M O N O Y w m % am d Y mo 0 N o e
Y e O O v go H 7 +1-1 L ✓- 0 O v 4 E , 0. 0 M. 3v c
H 09,+,800. Nm v ✓ H 0c9 a 004 a 9H r• 4 9W a 0 0
H Y H 4 i U O -ti O -•� W 0 .1 e S Y H a N w A O b' m O go .i .i L ti .i w m w w go
3 O w m� d U N O w a Y •I 9 .1 0 Y +1 Y 0 0+ 00 H 0 .i e 9 0
9 OAv
waNC .WPi WY_m•+W-Na4CU �0mv o4c 0 cO6 -9 cow YH c c 0 .1 o> O 0 a9 Mo
aq 0, m UYHWrOY O9Hh 04 0h H ad 09 9m -O Ym
W
VEAGd mWpNNm09 0HqHPUPEovvo adCE•TVvvH 1 a -.9 P. l
OF
9 0, W .1 U U .I G P-•1 � •+ - U U c c 4 0 9 •1 4 aH 3 G d d a H y -•1 9 r• C v 0.
H0.a.1U 0 X7.1 9U 09YA0 p 4E Ha 04 aL .1 N m 00 aAh c.10 d.1 mm 9
Fi Oda W9 9TH y 4a 94 a 090.ab 9 Z+ y 00" ✓b U•1 6> uv agbp aY yGb
✓ L40.NC dCW CwF0a WP Hy Amcow.9 0W 99 9w W.IC W.I •v CO %% oo
Ca UWo✓O IL4P H0+1No 1K4 60 UO a.I Ww. 40 as HONED OW m7 H9 w .]SI C.p0.a 9� m✓H
a0.Gi0 .Ib PO Cpw
dM a R U O 4M a R U 9 xN e p U n'1]co .IN a
I f l I I I I I I I I I
H Oa ✓ H d
C ✓ -H L H 0 a W m G L
0 Y C 1 ✓ O v 7 A Y G W d H O L 4 Y 4 1 (�•
L✓ 0 o 0 G C .� 0 ✓ 4 +1 v U d d 1 v c w P a m W O
Y O G-. O 0 -d d 3H eo 4 m o Y 4 1 on O b Ow 9my H P I
3L d -I ✓ Wk -h N 0w9 H✓ N 7 H 03 O N 7 f 9 dN T OMAN ~3 Z 49 -•Cf c
✓ N a0 U >7 W T .1 O G 7 O a Uy NA W 0 HH v .iA N9 c4 H W9 O
9 0 0 Oy✓.1 4 - H OH0 0y yT a.1d 6P Mm .INYvtl O O W U ova +� .1
Fw .-1 .Iw E44.1 m 0CW .10 4 C9 414✓ -ET 9 vWM 1 ML.ti 00 Y a
00 4 E O d H E 4 O v C� Yp, W a 3 00 H 0 PW N w CA9 H FJ+ ✓vH o.1N 0 >
H 0 0 O NW+19 Q. G+IY 49U N9 EG pC3"v0 �O q✓g0e> ;OC dHW P
0 O F .10..10 O avl
c m Q. N O W 0 E o .. H N U a 0 0 4 y O a �•1 Nov - 9 v 3 d - w q 9 H 0. O m r• .1
O W 0 +1 +1 O a P 0. H 0 N 0 W C O O O U O O W O Y a 0 U 0 0 0 H 0 b a 9
Uh N 4v WYGW 0m Q✓VJ y.1 off y901✓>h w.1 0.0N X HVH 4W W W O
9 %v 4 4o- C O +IH 0 U -I +1✓ 4YOw W go 9.I Q HT Ow AH W m g d 40 yA> W O
00C HMT On• H L 9 a 0 EW a v +1 499Ov v W H30 .13w W a q H
.1 a 0 00Y -•10 FOWH ✓ C -3 C440 GW 0 HO+IW b.1 GW ✓+14.1N 0 0393 d W
v L w.1 +1 v4 w PO .IHm 4 G OO GS 0 0 a ym9 00 Fo9NyO .Iw Wh a C
U.1H Y vW, 40 dF H OV4 o9N +1 +f P wwH .i H3 94 v0.1m 00 .1 O N
W
C o o 0 9 Y H g T H b F m WPC>.E 9 A Y W A A W m C AM H✓ b q N a
a LL ✓U N U U HVU.~i 3 Pmo k ow Ncg4 HN Pon A3 -mH -7 Imo N PGO.y1M 7 Y C1, NTN" 9 N
m9 0 am 0 94WW C+ 0 WW FwT U00H W✓ 04a 900300 ma. 0. Ov4v O 1
GOO $ A N o.i Y�1 TU a>> 4q✓✓ Y 0H9 0v00yN v ✓ qOH y 044 pp,,HN O m
VO-- 0000 Fm 40910H U UUUEP U•HOM3 RU UWA Way N�9BP 403 UU,YP..c 0a.m Wp,Goo W .ma
Ho- 0
A 4 -F-1 a A U 3 -CI a A U 9 d M P A .�
J
N r1 d�
a G 1 P .1 ZJ A I 1
N 0 0 4a 9 F ✓ 1 1 1
+1 O -L'ym 404 C -d PEO
O 4 Oyb> My W go.Qov-L . E i>g7j� 1
H wCNO 94N HL TN+10>a C9
O CC m�Ua 0
d9 4aT.U,E0Wc 0°0
w 0PCb - >b.�G+1 A = aHy 0 9+1
L qd 0P.UiA NOG 3 OyO NEO 009
Y 99 +IN v W UO +1 T✓+IU N N a
4 >0 -O G -N 9>-AFml1 4Wy
O V O9P 0 -0 09..31 W aW> >.1
✓ wU N GH Z.I 3aa 99.19 Cw0
00 4N -•IO Wd> 0 >. PG CW Ova H
O a0 HU"- U9P >4 .ku.9 YWN N P1 - H 1T>d 0
a ✓H Oa.1W ow", d-19m.1ao4 0F0 p a h NOtltiLH 1 1 a
C go. E 7 N 0 L H v o m> l r o N 0 a Y C P U d O 4 S 4 Y O O m 9 9 4
04-
PV - C Y d G O .1 O N 0 C b C. C .1 0 N W N 9 c c e
4 .1a dv b OC ao UHa H.19 O 4 4 O 04 4 .1 0 N - O -9A CWv "mov.
o H L m b P 9 4 0 A v 0 9 Q. 4 0 9 W 9 v .1 U E 0 O H T T 0 0 a b .0 0 0 4 .1 0 0
a ✓ 7>.cv WO'. OL9W v0 2.1G9 .1 y.i W>w dCL .1 99- W .1 NN 4G
N W 0-•10 0 YY H6U eA dW qN 1 d0 a .IP UO To >q4 9'•1a OFFL O9c Oa -P
WT 9 9.1 WPba H ✓LH P+I bET b 00 DU G.1 O FOA .1403 0.1 Lb 4
0 aA 040 0.c.r 4am9 ✓ '•IN. Gu00UO a o0 0.W Ed 000 3a✓ .viavow - • UXm,-g1
U U 314.1 _ O-•17 - LCFd✓ ti
4 U9 010P 49mb O -g O4UGyyp�y� o 31044 O U0 0> H4 - ww aAq OF 0T 4-•10 d•+
Y �✓ ao'•I-1 09 4.O�•l eai yHv 0.0.~OE4 HO>0 4 GU. 9U OW 00.1 go.
0 40.10q✓A 0ON"-r
4 H U a 9 H 0 1 W a W 0 0 0 9 v a O H C Y G H A U .IMP 9 0 W +i O L 0..1 L •+
0d 0 -4 1CNo 0 .Iv WH -n0 0. w4Wa 0 N+1 -Or• O4 vy0 004 9A0HU HT O✓b
C 0✓ y>✓ L p .1 W 4 F N W 6 T F A A q h a N V" 00, 0 Mo W O G W W H 9
0 F+IUO v 4A U X9N TO 04.1 ✓ 000 9C -N H 'JUO qm Cwc a 4 00,0J
O mN qbW O-7 R U a.r .Ia am: OOg9 WW 000 cvh -.I ah d0C .10-I NLE YE
P. a .. _ m W P A. W O H A d 4 31 H H U F •1 N a P H .1 +I a Ham ✓ w P b H N O O✓ q H go
v 3 T 4 0 a T o C E A v•+ > E U 0 W H o o H H C 0 y v 0 a .1 0 U W o 9 0 d 0 N Y m
>e O0 90.N C CN -+i H O 0.1-104 0V-0 +1 A 0 A,u 0 0 v k o9 Wa H C N 00 a CTH a qm
0 'a p4U•+1 00 m.1 ,-1 PW N44mEyp Wobb 3 vU❑U HO.Y 90✓ 'UEPv ~wm CmG-•Iw Wco O✓L9
4 0 o
09v W q -I4 4 C 4 0= PW+IU o -nW m lr m E woo W q T✓Y 40 4v9 W.X 0.P ;N
C tia A W4 A4y> F -I✓0.m WN q0 d0w G9v w0 LNd AHCW G4r GHL+IONU4 X
O 4n Way +IEtid Z 3b 00044 vHO0 G ❑aa 000 UPw FOOw 430 UW Um E00.i W"a.
U U✓ H> 0 C N .I N W O m o m E W .1 A H a ✓ ••
N U'." UG -•14 i .IG WY4W.IC U 4-1 N
On 0 O U •F .1 O m 0 0 0 L % 4g
004N W+Ia0 O O-•IYCGEv.1y
M W 4 O 4 0.O ❑✓ W Y 0.• W m U O 4 W m N b M r^ P
>H> N a 4.1 P a v 4 . 4 4 0 t 1
C w L� E W-Nv=a E .1040 HITEMJ !/1`
4 m U W F �++ N 3 Y 9 E H a W e a AGENDA NO.
PAGE J.! OF
1 Yti Y
I C 1 Y O
00 w NwwUwN U
6 6 W 0 000.4 0 N tl .� w 0 49 U VWF
004 me° wo > N mwLq
w 4 W tl U g 0 U 0 0✓ d
6Y TO m w0 H wNY✓0 0 0 0 tl L Oti w w
C O O N U m'N i
YHCG :0
Ob Lmtl UO O40=
YU
NG�Y U OwYL •yi iia: v oo3 ON3 H
HO tl w w00wm N 000 k CP0 w0m-+
S C O W O 4 N E° N 4 0 U w 4N 0,01 O• w m N
•^ U 0 Y0Y0 4 OO O, 00 C0a m0•0a
TO Y A o+, LOYYCF LMtl > =y4
V
C✓Yw p: YY 0 Y>Omu YYLY yM 0Y
o o L 9 0 N O LH Q C U UN 0 0 w
+10NO�b N NY Y0 NtlYLNO 00 dq Nbwm
Y m g C Y q N Y m N N o Y Y N w N N -.I U Y
tl0^-•�w w +ICL -+O NG0N0A 00 0 N%tl0
dw6'YY 0 3tiYA d 3tiq 4R0 QP, tlY 3000.
U N Y C N
0gLX 0 y
0:0Y 0Y U tl R U 9
01 O
N N
�I�`lyd�i�l XI -1
I 111111 I i
Y -Al
N N
3 Y C• N N'N C•
pC 3 0 1 b N 0 Y 1 N
0 C Y 0� 0 1- N 0 O
d 0 d 0 1 N O ti G N O Y N F N w A l 0 Q. O 0 O A
L 7 C O tl ti P tl H N d m 0 q 0 w 0 W 0 O P. Y •p O tl O C C 0
Y w d C N 6 0 00 E L 0 3 N d X d Q. N 0 y w N 0 3 y U T 0.
YHN w Nti p bG 4Y NON b• Y Y G dt N 0 bNNF q 6tim N
NUOrod F Ury A9 N 0. N
N.;�wwO•w0YC0 tY FC tiCO Nmb0 'J0.NU YC 4w titlTqYT-NO w 4G�-G.� °� NT ytl qG 'NO A✓ LN'q.IU%.t
W4 AYy2i'^>w+NN31LydtiNgU
yO
v 0 O OU
b w0 mw 0 O.L
y `
0Ew O wY C 0 C0 C%00NYwmN w w 0 G
tl YN ✓O CYm
000 +� U 0ti Ol E 0 tlG +bC'OY ✓N v C y z tl +� 0y'O0 40 NN w+1Y0.
•CGN y 0 AN C L .00 0 u N•° N O y O 0. 3•• O HA O NAgp L O
b0 0T U Y Y+� m� N y b NC d w N0AW q +� d H d G w60 WL +�0✓ Yy
d tl> L d 0 O U U N 0 H 0 0 w A o +1 0 0 G ✓ 0 0 ✓ -•1 O w N O
UY Otl y w m C0 >F N D 0.0y0 3CN0 q y N NYq 30-•IUpY✓
ti>> CU, 0 0. 0 ww q+� ON N b N0 m A w U w tl tl Gy G OAy 0Nq L>+ibtl+i
+Gi .. ➢. d .bi °N Wtir. $.. Wd q•Od 4013 •tl Q✓ O C F O B3B 3?.°i'OAN 7y by UAMGm
WNN wm ro d w O XC Cti' 03�>>+1 °W NN gkg= 0+1 .Y 0 ER0 0 0 Y ti 0 m 00Ngo vk� fi mz 00,0 +°i .Gi C4Ntl>
U 0 b V U 4 -wi O 0 C. q q 0 Y 0 y b W a 0 O w W v y 6 N O O Q d y 0 F w 0 Y d C % O dy U 0 N O b
.100N^tl W 0. N 4Y SwN Om ITN �O N'O0w0 +'iN OG•• M U ; N N N CN ULA+1 W4 CHMAO Gry
N4N q> w7 Noy ON qq ✓7 ✓4CO3
AO ND` O N +fib b• w fi N N N T OOw
N N N 0 C C 0 Y 0 TY'•+ 0 O O
d 0 C O H++w.
0.00 b•i q R U 'O 0 W wk tl A ❑wmtl✓ tl A U 'O d W S0. 0 A 4 km 4Y0>
N N N N N
XI XI xl xl 5d xl -4 -A1 -/-4 �/-I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
m
m ✓ ^ 1 N
OF H 0Yro tli OC b Nd 10 bb
1 0 m ONA N+iG1 0�✓q
0 m C .• q> XG 0G
�w•O L W0 m 0 b'O 0 OAY NHO C +10 wq CC C Nq
00 Y OU H 0 CO �l b 4+�ww ao+ C+ Yfi qH 00 YO U-.1
m Y H G 7 H O O 'O fT w w 9 O N O b Y O C A d 0. •i C •+ d 1-. w
W -0. N d0 OY 0 O'O tik - 00 wYA O -++ MY tlH V 0Y 0YN w ,Cy
•OND N d u Y G Y •9 O.Vl OY° °•.mi 0 OG9 O0 N.tli cw Ytl U.tli O ✓N d
G.>igY 3 HN Nd N Gq Np,GN °Nmm Acv •Ool wY 4NO Y°C• q0 4U4 ;0 Mk
gOpu •• Y 4N N ML k U iN Y.tfq 'Jw UH m -N b.(T 4d w tl04
C GN dA ti N OW COgm4 C N 000 w A .IbC HN O-Nw Ow
LOO N•+ Ytl '00 3•• 'OOHO 4,C -.+N w0 %0, tiG y0OF v Y0
Yn m 0 H 3 d CO G •- 0 N104 ✓ Um 0> 0•+X O N HO
A-4 Uy C0 Nm > 0
r 0 0 N90fi0Yw tiY O O,V •N O -C•1 NG +1�tl YtlYO.r• +N1 wm Yfi OO • .NN N
001 tiy0 LNN0 ;0 GO CCOLO C-.
Cyp?tl ✓0Gm W 9 0 O4 00 OO 00 O q
ON > OmUtiOCY O Y C y5 ym
w h m m
U b 0 0 0 m 0
C d w roG CO X U b G m m q w tl G - fi 1 Cry G • N'^ o ; b 0 Y H Y O m U 3 C C N y G 0 Y U m b-•1
'•�T ro w 6ti 0•N+I •� dm2 +fib tl0. tl •i ✓ 40 0,fi tlH> w q -+1 q•ON
N O U N {K 0 C Y C 0 O q 0 w m N Y N b ..V m O m G 0 % yy w Y ry U w C Y y 0 w 0 0 0 w d W 0 N U
w^.NC N wtl N O N wU0 +1 b mC+�G +�GOL dtlr• 1�m d•�Y w mby 0Y H\ 0Cw
GV -0 N N U A To
W0
O O Y H m A Y 'O O U O Y Y 'O D• P O L C 'O C IT H ANN Y Y 'O PN q ONO T
0g0- q m C w PCO Ow Y H 9 A O o, �^ U-^ tl m C Y d G 0.M d•O m W C O •o % T N g w G N O N C g ti
UC0.4 w0 NO Ntlw O NG.H 4YbGUYmY N -Am Uv- 0 00fi wl1 W0b 4404 KAY MLA
'J 4 X 4 i m C Y 9 . 0. 0 G N
Y O m O 4 Y O m ',] W m o q N
R 26 d A Mo. a A A, W.O.N. 'F°.tl UG E3 tl
A U b d W
AGENDA ITEM NO.
N N N N
PAGE OF=
I.
II.
III
1-23-86
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wild-
life population to drop below
self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental
goals?
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
YES MAYBE NO
i
i
All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative
declaration to be issued.
DETERMINATION•
The proposed project should not have a significant
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration
will be prepared.
Although the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant effect on the environment, it will not in this
case because of the attached mitigation measures.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
The proposed project may have a significant effect
on the environment. An EIR is required.
REVIEWED BY: Gabrielle Restivo DATE: 2/16/90
'V` 4
PLANNING DIRECTOR:� DATE: -
AGENDA ITEM NO. L�,,,,
PAGE OF -RP
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-SUPPLMENTAL INFORMATION
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-1
4. Proposed project
The proposed project is an 8,000 square foot industrial
building on a .41 net acre lot. The site is located 420
feet north of Flint Street, west of Langstaff Street.
Surrounding the project is mostly vacant land with a
single-family dwelling south of the project and the City
of Lake Elsinore Public Works yard north of the property.
The project area is an infill area of the City's
industrial/residential corridor. The proposed use of the ,
building is a machine shop.
5. Environmental Setting
The site is generally flat, rising to a hill top
northerly of the site. The site has been previously
disturbed and consists of weedy plant species of little
biological significance. Surrounding the site is mostly
disturbed vacant land with a single-family dwelling south
of the site and the City's Public Works maintenance yard
to the north. The site is in the 100 year floodplain of
the Temescal Wash at the 1270 contour level which
constitutes the first 45 feet of property frontage. No
wetland vegetation exists on the site. The soil survey
of Western Riverside County indicate the soils are
garretson gravelly very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15%
slopes. Run-off is medium and erosion hazard moderate,
with a low -shrink swell potential. There are only slight
to moderate septic limitations between 0 to 15% slope.
A limited amount of basin/floodplains soils may exist on
site waukena loamy fine sand 0 to 2% slope. Run-off is
very slow, the hazard of erosion is moderate and septic
tank limitations are severe. There are no notable
biological, historical or cultural aspects associated
with the site.
7.1.b.c Environmental Impacts - Grading and Soil Impacts
The site has property frontage within the 100 year
floodplain of the Temescal Wash. Only approximately
thirty feet of building area will be affected. Any
grading activity will have to meet the City's Flood
Damage Prevention Ordinance and meet the U.B.C. Code and
the City's Grading Ordinance. No environmental impacts
are anticipated.
7.3.b.c.i. Absorption Changes
The site has approximately 45 feet of frontage in the 100
year floodplain. Although no significant alteration to
the course is proposed, increased drainage is likely due
to impervioous surfaces. A hydrology/hyraulic study will
be required and the necessary improvements bonded for, to
insure drainage is directed to a public facility. No
significant environmental impacts are anticipated.
Construction and pad elevations will have to meet the
requirements of the flood damage prevention Ordinance to
ensure no property damage is probable. No impacts are
anticipated.
7.7 Exterior lights will be shielded above the horizontal
plane. No environmental impacts are anticipated.
7.8. The current General Plan designation for the site is
limited industrial and floodway fringe. The proposal is
consistent with this designation. A General Plan
revision study is proposing a change to high density
residential for the area. An industrial use is clearly
inconsitent; however, the current General Plan is still
in effect. L(.,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 52
PAGE_ OF-&-
e
FL INT ST
T�
i I
I I
I
N W d Q q
k I
I
�I I
a
I
FL INT ST
T�
i I
I I
I
N W d Q q
k I
I
a�
1
i
i
i
a
i r
b
ti
T T
/1
b
I
I
wl
N
i
I
I
PAGE—L-OF
r
,
- -- baa . • _
FT
LL
Ord
It
10
ELfiVS4or{ pa1}IrC}W yri,Ww eR)
.. P
f
w�wr�e.l.+r
'a�} GWUMM MKt.
pn •r�Tr�p �.rYr'y.r y�- ��
µ.HQ
_ K _
01 -
w.r...s
u t•r r i
O LO D
COYMERCTAL BUILDING FOR LSC ENG.
GJv �l AGENDA ITEM] �NO.
PAGEJ �L_ OF
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: NW SEWER PROJECT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1
(��
PREPARED BY: 2,[-� APPROVED:
Ron Kirchner Ron Molendyk
Director of Public City Manager
Services
In April, 1986, petitions were filed with the City Council
requesting the construction of a sewer to serve the property along
Collier Street from Chaney to Nichols. Since that time the project
has been under design and staff is now ready to proceed with the
project development.
FINDINGS
Staff has prepared the necessary engineering and legal documents
to commence the project. Representatives of the engineering
consultant and the Bond Counsel will present the maps, reports and
resolutions and respond to questions as per the attached Order of
Procedure (Exhibit "A"). Copies of the Engineer's Report have been
distributed to the Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
All costs associated with the work are included in the project
costs and will be assessed to the benefited properties. There is
no direct cost to the City.
Hear the presentation by the Engineer and Attorney and adopt
resolutions including:
EXHIBIT
Resolution Making Appointments B
Resolution Adopting Proposal Boundry Map C
Resolution of Intention D
Resolution Passing on "Report" and Setting
Public Hearing E
Resolution Calling For Construction Bids F
Resolution Setting Hearing on Eminent Domain
Proceedings G
Resolution Approving Agreements H
/ O
Pfi zE F 3 ,
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1
DATE OF MEETING: MARCH 13, 1990
STAFF: General presentation as to boundaries of Assessment District
and extent of works of improvement.
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP: Formal
action approving boundaries of proposed Assessment District.
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION OF INTENTION: Jurisdictional Resolution
under "1913 Act" proceedings, declaring intent to finance
improvements through the issuance of bonds.
STAFF: Presentation of Engineer's "Report" pursuant to the
provisions of "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913".
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION PASSING ON REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC
HEARING: Preliminary approval of the Engineer's "Report" and
sets date, time and place for public hearing.
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION CALLING FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS: Formal
.action authorizing bidding on the works of improvement.
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING ON EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS: Sets hearing on necessity to order condemnation
for easements necessary to accomplish the improvements.
CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS: Formal acceptance of
the Agreements with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
and Long Beach Equities.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE:
MARCH 13, 1990: ADOPT JURISDICTIONAL RESOLUTIONS AND AUTHORIZE BIDDING ON
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND SET PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 12, 1990: DATE FOR RECEIPT OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS
APRIL 24, 1990: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
A. CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
B. ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
C. NECESSITY FOR EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
D. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
E. AUTHORIZE SALE OF BONDS
A,GENr. ITr-M NC1, �
4
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. Q 1\
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPOINTMENTS
IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, is
considering the formation of a special assessment district, pursuant to the
terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for
the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appur-
tenances and appurtenant work, said special assessment district to be known
and designated as NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, at this time, this legislative body is desirous of making the
required appointments and designating persons to perform certain duties, in
order to allow the proceedings to go forward to completion in accordance with
the provisions of law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That the DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES is hereby appointed to
perform all of the duties and functions of the Superintendent of
Streets as said duties are specified and designated in the
"Municipal Improvement Act Of 191311, being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the
above -referenced Assessment District.
3. That the place for recordation of the assessment roll and diagram
shall be in the Office of the superintendent of Streets, and said
assessment roll and diagram, upon recordation, shall 'be kept as a
permanent record.
;A ITEM NO...�._
EXHIBIT B PAGE 3 a''-"�
4. That the SUN TRIBUNE is hereby designated as the newspaper for all
publications as required by law and as necessary for completion of
this Assessment District.
5, That NBS/LOWRY is hereby appointed the Assessment Engineer for
said proceedings, and said Assessment Engineer shall perform all
of the duties and responsibilities as set forth by law as they
relate to said Assessment District.
6. That BROWN & DIVEN and HARPER & BURNS, Attorneys at Law, are
hereby appointed to act as Bond Counsel for the purposes of prepar-
ing proceedings and issuing an approving opinion_ attesting to the
validity of the proceedings and the enforceability of the bonds,
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the special Counsel Agree-
ment submitted herewith, which Agreement is hereby accepted and
approved for execution.
7. That this legislative body hereby establishes a special IMPROVE-
MENT FUND designated by the name and number of the Assessment
District, and into said fund shall be placed all proceeds from the `
sale of bonds and cash collections. In order to expedite the
improvements or acquisition under these proceedings and as autho-
rized by law, funds from any available source may be transferred
into said special fund. Any funds transferred are a loan to the
fund and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the sale of bonds,
including authorized incidental expenses, as well as costs for the
construction of the authorized public improvements, all as
required and authorized by law, and specifically Section 10210 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
A ^ DA ITEM N0.
PAGE 4 OF 3
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of
1990.
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ITEM NO. 53
PA',._ S or
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. , was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
, 1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this day of
California.
[SEAL]
1990, at Lake Elsinore,
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
fiGE"XDIA }TEM NO. -L3 .
PAVE- _OF'J-5?
SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,
1990, by and between the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, a public corporation
(hereinafter referred to as "City"), and BROWN & DIVEN and HARPER & BURNS, (herein-
after collectively referred to as "Counsel").
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows:
SECTION 1. That Counsel shall perform legal services in connection with the
proposed assessment proceedings and bond issuance in the matter of a
proposed special assessment district known and designated as NORTHWEST
SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1, (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District") under proceedings conducted pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
Said services shall include:
A. Review of the dedication and acquisition of the streets and ease-
ments and other property in which work is proposed to be performed;
B. Examination of the plans and specifications for the proposed work,
the boundary map and assessment diagram of the Assessment District,
the assessment roll and bonds, and the giving of instructions and
advice in connection with the foregoing;
C. Recommendations as to procedure, schedules and actions that should
be conducted and taken;
D. Preparation of all resolutions, notices, contracts, bond forms, and
other papers and documents required in the proceedings;
E. Examination of the proceedings, step by step, as taken;
F. Appear at all hearings under the proceedings, and attend any meeting
where attendance is requested;
G. Make recommendations as to sale of bonds, if desired;*
H. Perform legal services, if required, pursuant to the provisions of
the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority
Protest Act of 1931", being Division 4 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California;
I. Issuance of an approving legal opinion attesting to the validity of
the proceedings and the issuance of the bonds.
Such legal services shall not include any services in connection with
the acquisition, by easement or condemnation, of any easements or other
interest in real property necessary for the proposed improvements.
These services can be provided by Counsel, by separate agreement, if
desired.
1TEM NO,
G -F 3 ,�
SECTION 2. That the City shall perform as follows:
A. Furnish to Counsel such maps, records, title searches, and other
documents and proceedings, or certified copies thereof, as are
available and may be reasonably required by Counsel in the
performance of the services hereunder; ,
B. Pay to Counsel a fee computed on the confirmed assessment as
follows:
ONE PERCENT (16) of the first $2,000,000;
ONE-HALF PERCENT (.506) from $2,000,001 to $5,000,000;
ONE-QUARTER PERCENT .256) on the balance thereof.
If temporary bond anticipation notes are issued, the fee shall be
twenty-five percent (256) of the fee as above set forth, but not
less than $2,500.00, unless a different fee has been mutually agreed
upon between the parties.
C. Payment of either of the above -referenced fees shall be as follows:
All due and payable upon receipt of money from the sale and delivery
of bonds and/or notes to the successful underwriter.
SECTION 3. In the event the proceedings are terminated or abandoned prior to comple-
tion, Counsel shall be paid a reasonable fee for services rendered to
date based on an hourly rate of $135.00 per hour, not to exceed $5,000.
SECTION 4. This Agreement contemplates that Counsel shall pay all ordinary out-of-
pocket expenses incurred, including travel, telephone and copy, and the
only expenses to be billed to City would be extraordinary messenger
and/or overnight mail delivery services.
SECTION S. That this Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mailing
written notice thereof to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first hereinabove written.
"CITY"
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TTMV. N0.
Ph3c OF ��
"COUNSEL"
BROWN & VENA
By: fl /!I/
F. MACRENZZE
HARPER & BURNS
By:
JOHN HARPER
- S3
RESOLUTION NO. 0 -,,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOW-
ING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF A SPECIAL ASSESS-
MENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
has been presented and has received a map showing and.,describing the bounda-
ries of the area proposed to be assessed in an assessment district under the
provisions and authority of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; said
assessment district known and designated as NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That a map of the Assessment District showing the boundaries of
the proposed Assessment District and lands and property to be
assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the proposed improve- `
ments designated as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESS-
MENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1" is hereby submitted, and the same is
hereby approved and adopted.
3. That the original map of said proposed boundaries of the proposed
Assessment District and one copy thereof is to be filed in the
Office of the City Clerk.
4. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least
one copy of the map of the Assessment District, evidencing the
date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days
after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of
hearing on the formation or extent of said Assessment District, a
fTE
EXHIBIT C r� L�
c
copy of said map shall be filed with the correct and proper
endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner
and form provided for in section 3111 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of
1990.
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. , was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this
California.
[SEAL]
day of
, 1990, at Lake Elsinore,
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
iTEW NO,
RESOLUTION NO. l0 _13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION
AND COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION TO ORDER
THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; ORDERING THE PRE-
PARATION OF A REPORT DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO
BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the inten-
tion of this body, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Municipal Improvement Act 1913"), to order the construction of
certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and
appurtenant work, in a special assessment district known and
designated as NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (here-
inafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. The construction and installation of sanitary sewer facili-
ties, including sewer mains, manholes, laterals and lift
station facilities, together with appurtenances and appurte-
nant work, including the payment of incidental and sewer
charges, all necessary to serve and benefit properties
located within the boundaries of this Assessment District.
B. Said streets, rights-of-way and easements shall be shown upon
the plans herein referred to and to be filed with these
proceedings.
V ' 33.
EXHIBIT D OF3„
C. All of said work and improvements are to be constructed at
the places and in the particular locations, of the forms,
sizes, dimensions and materials, and at the lines, grades and
elevations as shown and delineated upon the plans, profiles
and specifications to be made therefor, -as hereinafter
provided.
D. The description of the improvements and the termini of the
work contained in this Resolution are general in nature. All
items of work do not necessarily extend for the full length
of the description thereof. The plans and profiles of the
work as contained in the Engineer's "Report" shall be
controlling as to the correct and detailed description
thereof.
E. Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases said
work and improvement will bring the finished work to a grade
different from that formerly existing, and that to said
extent, said grades are hereby changed and said work will be
done to said changed grades.
DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
2. That said improvements and work are of direct benefit to the
properties and land within the Assessment District, and this
legislative body hereby makes the expenses of said work and
improvement chargeable upon a district, which said Assessment
District is hereby declared to be the Assessment District
benefited by said work and improvements and to be assessed to pay
the costs and expenses thereof, including incidental expenses and
costs and which is described as follows:
�3
OF
All that certain territory in the District included within the
exterior boundary lines shown on the plat exhibiting the property
affected or benefited by or to be assessed to pay the costs and
expenses of said work and improvements in the Assessment
District, said map titled and identified as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES
OF NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1", and which map
was heretofore approved and which said or diagram is on file with
the transcript of these proceedings, EXCEPTING therefrom the area
shown within and delineated upon said map or plat hereinabove
referred to, the area of all public streets, public avenues,
public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public
alleys, and all easements and rights-of-way therein contained
belonging to the public. For all particulars as to the bounda-
ries of the Assessment District, reference is hereby made to said
boundary map heretofore previously approved, and for a complete
description of said Assessment District, the said plat and
proposed boundary map on file shall govern.
REPORT OF ENGINEER _
3. That this proposed improvement is hereby referred to the
ENGINEER OF WORK, who is hereby directed to make and file the
report in writing containing the following:
A. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements;
B. An estimate of the cost of the proposed works of improvement,
including the cost of the incidental expenses in connection
therewith;
C. A diagram showing the Assessment District above referred to,
which shall also show the boundaries and dimensions of the
respective subdivisions of land within said Assessment
llr
District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of
the Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions shall
be given a separate number upon said Diagram;
D. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the assessable
costs and expenses of the proposed improvement upon the
several divisions of land in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively,
from said improvement. Said assessment shall refer to such
subdivisions upon said diagram by the respective numbers
thereof;
E. The description of the works of improvement to be constructed
under these proceedings, and acquisition, where necessary.
F. The total amount, as near as may be determined, of the
principal sum of any unpaid special assessments previously
levied or pending, other than those contemplated in these
proceedings.
G. The true value of the parcels of land and improvements which
are proposed to be assessed. Said true value may be esti-
mated as the full cash value of the parcels as shown upon the
last equalized assessment roll of the County.
When any portion or percentage of the cost and expenses of the
improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments,
the amount of such portion or percentage shall first be deducted
from the total estimated costs and expenses of said work and
improvements, and said assessment shall include only the
remainder of the estimated costs and expenses. Said assessment
shall refer to said subdivisions by their respective numbers as
assigned pursuant to Subsection D. of this Section.
i'fl •'. OF n
BONDS
4. Notice is hereby given that bonds to represent the unpaid assess-
ments, and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed the current
legal maximum rate of 12% per annum, will be issued hereunder in ,
the manner provided in the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being
Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, which bonds shall mature a maximum of and not to
exceed TWENTY-FOUR (24) YEARS from the second day of September
next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. The
provisions of Part 11.1 of said Act, providing an alternative
procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the calling
of bonds shall apply.
The principal amount of the bonds maturing each year shall be
other than an amount equal to an even annual proportion of the
aggregate principal of the bonds, and the amount of principal
maturing in each year, plus the amount of interest payable in
that year, will be generally an aggregate amount that is equal
each year, except for the first year's adjustment.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, specifically Section 10603, the
Treasurer is hereby designated as the officer to collect and
receive the assessments during the cash collection period. Said
bonds further shall be serviced by the Treasurer or designated
Paying Agent.
"MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913"
5. That except as herein otherwise provided for the issuance of
bonds, all of said improvements shall be made and ordered
pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
Ac=IADfi !TEW, NO ..� 3,
SURPLUS FUNDS
6. That if any excess shall be realized from the assessment, it
shall be used, in such amounts as the legislative body may
determine, in accordance with the provisions of law for one or
more of the following purposes:
A. Transfer to the general fund; provided that the amount of any
such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of One Thousand
Dollars ($1,Ooo.00) or five percent (5%) of the total from
the improvement Fund;
B. As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental
assessment; or
C. For the maintenance of the improvement.
SPECIAL FUND
7. The legislative body hereby establishes a special improvement
fund identified and designated by the name of this Assessment
District, and into said Fund monies may be transferred at any
time to expedite the making of the improvements herein autho-
rized, and any such advancement of funds is a loan and shall be
repaid out of the proceeds of the sale of bonds as authorized by
law.
PRIVATE CONTRACT
S. Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be
served by allowing the property owners to take the contract for
the construction of the improvements, and that, as authorized by
law, no notice of award of contract shall be published.
GRADES
9. That notice is hereby given that the grade to which the work
shall be done is to be shown on the plans and profiles therefor,
which grade may vary from the existing grades. The worK nerein
contemplated shall be done to the grades as indicated on the
plans and specifications, to which reference is made for a
description of the grade at which the work is to be done. Any
objections or protests to the proposed grade shall be made at the
public hearing to be conducted under these proceedings.
PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
10. For any and all information relating to these proceedings,
including information relating to protest procedure, your
attention is directed to the person designated below:
RON KIRCHNER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 SOUTH MAIN ST.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330
TELEPHONE: (714) 674-3125, EXT. 240
PUBLIC PROPERTY
11. All public property in the use and performance of a public
function shall be omitted from assessment in these proceedings
unless expressly provided and listed herein.
ACQUISITION
12. That the public interest, convenience and necessity requires that
certain land, rights-of-way or easements be obtained in order to
allow the works of improvement as proposed for this Assessment
District to be accomplished. For a general description of the
location and extent of the easements or land necessary to be
acquired, reference is hereby made to maps on file with the
transcript of these proceedings.
=,ADA 7'W, NO.
NO CITY LIABILITY
13. This legislative body hereby further declares not to obligate
itself to advance available funds from the Treasury to cure any
deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption fund. This ,
determination is made pursuant to the authority of Section
8769(b) of the Streets and Highways code of the State of Califor-
nia, and said determination shall further be set forth in the
text of the bonds issued pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of
1915".
DIVISION 4 PROCEEDINGS
14. It is the intention of this legislative body to fully comply with
the proceedings and provisions of the "Special Assessment Investi-
gation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931", being
Division 4 0£ the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California. A combined Report, as authorized by Section 2961,
will be on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open
for public inspection.
WORK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
15. It is hereby further determined to be in the best public interest
and convenience and more economical to do certain work on private
property to eliminate any disparity in level or size between the
improvements and the private property. The actual cost of such
work is to be added to the assessment on the lot on which the
work is done, and no work of this nature is to be performed until
the written consent of the property owner is first obtained.
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
16. This legislative body further proposes to enter into an Agreement
with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, as authorized
by Streets and Highways Code §10110, setting forth terms and
rc._� A
conditions to the award of the construction contract, the owner-
ship and maintenance of said facilities, including required
special sewer charges. A copy of said Agreement shall be, upon
approval, on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
1990.
i
=�j'A !iEV. N,' :o,�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this day of , 1990, at Lake Elsinore,
California.
[SEAL]
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
i.r ei�lA 17EM No, ��
RESOLUTION NO. aD_H
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON THE "REPORT"
OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
has instituted proceedings for the construction of certain public works of
improvement and appurtenances under provisions of the "Municipal improvement
Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as NORTH-
WEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and filed with the legislative body a
"Report" provided for in Sections 10203 and 10204 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, and this "Report" has been presented for
consideration; and,
WHEREAS, said "Report" is a combined "Report", consolidating the
requirements of both the "Municipal improvement Act of 1913" and the "Special
Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931"; and,
WHEREAS, a Resolution of Intention for this improvement was previously
adopted by the legislative body; and the "Report" as now presented shall
stand as the "Report" for the purpose of subsequent proceedings hereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That the "Report" of the Engineer referred to hereinabove is
considered adopted, passed upon, and preliminarily approved, as
follows:
V roc.
EXHIBIT E
A. That the plans and specifications for the proposed improve-
ments to be made, contained in said "Report" be, and they are
hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
B. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized` and total costs
and expenses of said acquisition, where necessary, and
improvements, and of the incidental expenses in connection
therewith, contained in said "Report", be, and each of them
are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
C. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to
and described in said Resolution of Intention, and also the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of
land within said Assessment District, as the same existed at
the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each
of which subdivisions have been given a separate number upon
said diagram, as contained in said "Report", be, and it is
hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
D. That the proposed assessment upon the several subdivisions of
land in said Assessment District, in proportion to the esti-
mated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respec-
tively, from said acquisition and improvements, and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said "Report",
be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
E. That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to
be acquired, as contained in said "Report" be, and the same
are hereby preliminarily approved;
F. That the total amount of unpaid and/or previously levied
special assessments, if any, as set forth, are preliminarily
approved;
L GF OF Si'
_z
G. That the valuation data, including the true value of the land
and improvements, as determined from the cash values of the
parcels as shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of
the County is hereby preliminarily approved.
3. That said "Report" shall stand as the Engineer's "Report" for the
purpose of all subsequent proceedings had pursuant to said Resolu-
tion of Intention.
4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL,
1990, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING
PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM, 545 CHANEY STREET, LAKE ELSINORE, CA,
ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED WORK,
OR ASSESSMENT, OR EXTENT OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, OR TO THE
PROPOSED GRADES, MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOULD
NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF
INTENTION AND THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER. PROTESTS MUST BE IN
WRITING AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK AT OR BEFORE THE
TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. `
5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said
Public Hearing by causing to be conspicuously posted on all open
streets within the Assessment District, not more than 300 feet
apart on each street so posted, but not less than 3 in all,
notice of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and of this
Resolution, all in accordance with the provisions of said
Division 12.
6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said
Public Hearing and of the passage of the Resolution of Intention
and this Resolution by causing such notice to be published in
accordance with section 6066 of the Government Code, in the
_.r',K)A 177 -Fat NO.
O
o�rc.0 OFA--
newspaper previously designated as the newspaper for all publica-
tions as required by law and as necessary for completion of this
Assessment District.
7. That the city Clerk is hereby directed to mail. Potice of said
Public Hearing and the adoption of the Resolution of Intention
and of the filing of the "Report" to all persons owning real
property proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses
appear on the last equalized assessment roll for County taxes
prior thereto, or as known to said city Clerk, and to all other
persons as prescribed in accordance with the provisions of said
Division 12.
B. That the city Clerk is hereby further directed to file a copy of
the proposed boundary map in the office of the County Recorder
Within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the proposed boundary
map; said boundary map to be in the manner and form as set forth
in Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1990.
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY _
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
1, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
No. , was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting
of said City Council held on the day of
, 1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
da of 1990, at Lake Elsinore,
EXECUTED this Y
California.
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
[SEAL]
i
RESOLUTION NO. RO—J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REFERENCING PREVAIL-
ING WAGE SCALE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUC-
TION BIDS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
has heretofore instituted proceedings under the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of
improvement in a special assessment district known and designated as NORTH-
WEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, at this time there have been submitted for final review the
plans and specifications for the works of improvement for the Assessment
District; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the legislative body to also call for
sealed proposals or bids for the doing of said work and improvements in said
Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the prevailing rate of wages for
the various classifications of workmen required in the performance of said
work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That the plans and specifications for the works of improvement in
the Assessment District are hereby approved and authorized for
bidding.
w'..,.5-3w�.A
EXHIBIT F
3. That it is hereby determined and ascertained that the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages in the locality in which said
work described is to be performed in the matter of the construc-
tion of certain public works of improvement, together with appurte-
nances, in the Assessment District, under the ,provisions of the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for each
craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the
contract, and also the general prevailing rate for legal holiday
and overtime work of each craft or type of workman or mechanic, is
in accordance with the schedule obtained from the Director of
Industrial Relations, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773
of the Labor Code of the State of California, and reference is
hereby made to copies thereof on file with the transcript of these
proceedings, which said copies are available to any interested
party upon request. Further a copy shall be posted at each job
site during the course of construction.
4. That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined at a
public meeting so called; and said results of the bidding shall be
reported at the next regular meeting of this legislative body
after the opening of the bids.
5. That the terms and conditions for bidding on the works of improve-
ment for this Assessment District are as set forth in full in the
Bid Documents in the specifications as previously approved.
Reference is hereby made to said Bid Documents heretofore approved
and identified as "NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS, NORTHWEST
SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (CONSTRUCTION)". For all parti-
culars as to bidding, the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals above
referenced and all incorporated documents and laws, including but
not limited to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", shall
control.
r_chx}G ITEM F40. a.G�-v-
6. That it is hereby determined that in the event the contractor,
contracting owners included, does not complete the work within the
time limit specified in the contract or within the time limit as
shall be authorized, the contractor or contracting owners, as the
case may be, shall pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts
as set forth in the specifications for the project, said amounts
herein referenced and so incorporated. That it is impractical to
determine the actual damage which will be sustained by reason of
such delay, but that the stated sum is a reasonable amount for
said liquidated damages and is not being imposed as a penalty.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
, 1990.
M1
=° OFsrs d
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
, 1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this day of
California.
[SEAL]
1990, at Lake Elsinore,
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OF -
2
Y
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, SETTING TIME AND
PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON NECESSITY TO ORDER
ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, is
conducting proceedings for a special assessment district pursuant to the
terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for
the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, including acquisi-
tion where necessary; said special assessment district known and designated
as NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1 (hereinafter referred to as
the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, under ,said special assessment district proceedings, it will
be necessary that certain right-of-way acquisition be made in order to accomp-
lish the construction of the works of improvement as proposed, and at this
time this governing body is desirous of setting a time and place for a public
hearing on the necessity to acquire rights-of-way and/or easements not yet --
acquired for the project and improvements in said Assessment District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That certain right-of-way acquisition is necessary for the accomp-
lishment of the improvements as proposed for the Assessment
District, and said rights-of-way are as set forth and described in
the proposed Resolution of Necessity to Exercise the Right of
Eminent Domain, with an Exhibit attached thereto setting forth the
proper and legal description of all rights-of-way to be acquired.
lcat-)A!TEV F: S-5
EXHIBIT G PAGEJ'-" pc��
3. THAT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF
APRIL, 1990, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR
MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE LAKE ELSINORE
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM, 545 CHANEY STREET, LAKE
ELSINORE, CA, ANY AND ALL PERSONS WHERE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY
ARE TO BE ACQUIRED, WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR AND TO BE
HEARD ON THE MATTER OF THE NECESSITY TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF
EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY NECESSARY
FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. ALL
PERSONS OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR THE
PROJECT AND THE DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
PLANNED OR LOCATED IN THE MANNER WHICH WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE
WITH THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD, AND THE NECESSITY FOR THE PROPERTY
TO BE ACQUIRED, SHOULD BE PRESENT AT SAID TIME AND PLACE.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1245.235 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE
FAILURE TO FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD WITHIN
FIFTEEN (15) DAYS AFTER THE MAILING OF THIS NOTICE WILL RESULT IN
A WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD.
4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of the
public hearing on the necessity to order acquisition by eminent
domain proceedings to all persons owning real property where it is
required that easements and/or rights -of- way be obtained in order
to accomplish the proposed works of improvement. Said mailing
shall be made to the names and addresses as they appear on the
last equalized assessment roll for County tax purposes, or as
known to the city Clerk, and shall be completed at least twenty
(20) days prior to the time said for said public hearing.
r
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of , 1990.
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA `
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
n tTEa` ASO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution,_ being Resolution
No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this day of , 1990, at Lake Elsinore,
California.
[SEAL]
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. Q -�1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
has, pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913",
being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, by adoption of its Resolution of Intention, declared its
intention to order the construction and installation of certain works of
improvement, together with appurtenances, in a special assessment district
known and designated as NORTHWEST SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer facilities to be constructed herein, upon
their completion, shall become part of the system and under the ownership and
control of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, and this legislative
body is now ready to enter into an agreement with said District as required
by Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California;
and,
WHEREAS, it is further provided that any such agreement shall be made
prior to the adoption of the Resolution Ordering Work under the assessment
proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, at this time certain facilities are being oversized to serve
property outside the boundaries of the Assessment District, and the property
owner receiving the benefit, being Long Beach Equities, is prepared to
finance the costs and expenses for said oversizing, and an agreement has been
prepared generally setting forth the terms and conditions relating to the
oversizing and the required payment thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
EXHIBIT HOF
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That the agreement as submitted between the City and the Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District relating to the construction,
ownership and maintenance of the sanitary sewer facilities is
hereby approved and authorized for execution by the Mayor and the
City Clerk.
3. That the agreement as submitted between the City and Long Beach
Equities relating to the oversizing and property owner payment is
hereby approved and authorized for execution by the Mayor and the
City Clerk.
4. That immediately upon execution, conformed copies of said
agreements shall be transmitted to the parties mentioned above,
together with a copy of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOPTED this day of , 1990. _
JAMES WINKLER
MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
VICKI LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN R. HARPER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
i
NAGE 2 Z— Or= �'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VICKI LYNNE KASAD, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the
meeting of said City Council held on the day of
, 1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTED this day of
California.
[SEAL]
, 1990, at Lake Elsinore,
VICKIE LYNNE KASAD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 883
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AMENDING MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTION 9.88.010 RELATING TO THE
DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore has enacting
Municipal Code Section 9.88.010 prohibiting and making unlawful
the discharge of certain types of weapons within the incorporated
limits of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Lake Elsinore
desires to amend said section providing for broader coverage of
the ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Municipal Code for the City of Lake Elsinore
is hereby amended as follows:
Section 9.88.010 Firearm. The word "firearm" as used
herein includes the following: cannon, gun, pistol, revolver,
automatic pistol, rifle, shotgun, air gun, pellet gun, and any
other weapon designed to discharge one or more projectiles
propelled by the expansion of gas.
Section 9.88.020. It shall be unlawful for any person
or persons to fire or discharge a firearm within the incorporated
limits of the City, as shown on the official map of the City on
file in the office of the City Clerk, with the exception of any
officer or special officer of the City, County or State in the
line of duty or on a pistol range, rifle range, skeet or trap
range having a proper special permit and current business
liscenses provided by law.
ction 9.88.030. It shall not be unlawful for a
person or persons to fire or discharge an air gun or pellet gun on
said person or persons lawfully occupied property within an
AGENDA IM' NO.
PAGE._) _.rOF-41—
enclosed area and for the purpose of target shooting as long as
the projectile fired or discharged remains within said enclosed
area and on the person or persons property.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED UPON FIRST READING this 27th
day of February , 1990, upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOP1INGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NONE
NONE
NONE
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON THE SECOND READING
this day of , 1990, upon the following roil
call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
L. Kasad, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John R. Harper, City Attorney
[SEAL]
-2-
Jim Winkler, Mayor
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OF. -
4.
5.
RN
A G E N D A
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990
POLICY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: "Only those items filed with
the Secretary.of the Redevelopment Agency by Noon on Tuesday,
prior to the following Tuesday meeting, will be considered by the
Agency at said meeting."
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved on one
motion unless a Boardmember requests separate action on a
s pRc i f iki t epes
1. February 27, 1990 — Regular Redevelopment
Agency Meeting.
B. Investment Report — February, 1990
C. Warrant List — February 28, 1990
D. Tentative Tract Map 24624 - Centex Homes.
E. Tentative Tract Map 23988 - Ortega Partners.
F. Tentative Tract Map 25442 - Doug Reuvers &
Sharon Gibson.
G. Commercial Project 89-9 - Pinnacle/Lakeshore #3.
H. Industrial Project 90-1 - Ed Carlson.
I. Northwest Sewer Project Assessment District
86-1.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Professional Services Agreement - Elsinore
Valley Community Development Corporation.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
Approve.
Rec. & File.
Ratify.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Concur with
Council
Action.
Approve
Agmt.
7.
8.
PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA - MARCH 13, 1990
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CLOSED SESSION
9. JADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order
by Chairman Washburn at 10:02 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant
Executive Director Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper,
Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development
Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh,
Public Services Director Kirchner and Clerk of the Board
Kasad.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
A. The following Minutes were approved:
1. February 13, 1990 - Regular Redevelopment Agency
Meeting.
B. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report from
January 31, 1990.
C. Concurred with Council Action to Continue Tentative Tract
Map 23988 - Ortega Partners to March 13, 1990.
D. Concurred with Council Action to Approve Tentative Tract
Map 24618 for George Wimpey.
E. Concurred with Council Action to Continue Tentative Tract
Map 25442 - Doug Reuvers and Sharon Gibson to March 13,
1990.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
5. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Downtown Parking Lots.
Executive Director Molendyk advised that a Closed session
is needed to discuss potential litigation involving the
proposed Downtown Parking Lots.
6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
None.
7. REPORTS AND
None.
AGENDA ITEM NO. �? • A
PAGE OF !.
PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - FEBRUARY 27, 1990
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 10:02 P.M.
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 10:04 P.M.
8. CLOSED SESSION
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION
AT 10:05 P.M. TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION RELATING TO PROPERTY
ACQUISITION.
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENED AT 10:30 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN.
9. ADJOURNMENT
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 10:31 P.M.
ATTEST:
VICKI KASAD
CLERK OF THE BOARD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
GARY M. WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
AGENDA ITEM NO. -a-L_
PAGE OF Q
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS
FEBRUARY 28, 1990
LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND 8.538% DAILY
GOVERNMENT BACKED SECURITIES - NEGOTIABLE
FEDERAL HOME MORTGAGE CO. 8.75% 03-16-88
GOV. NAT'L MORTGAGE ASSN. 7.500% 04-10-87
GOV. NAT'L MORTGAGE ASSN. 7.500% 04-28-87
24-HOUR $3,776,000
05-01-08 278,065
04-10-07 19,847
04-28-07 42.140
340,052
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- ---
AGENCY INVESTMENT TOTAL 4,116,052
---------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - MARCH, 1990
**Will meet anticipated expenditures
AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE...... 8.072%
i,:• 1wt.
AGENDA ITEMNO. 3
// r
PAGE 1_ OF—L_
LAKE ELSINORE—RDA
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-081
PAGE NO.
DATE 02/28/90
R
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANTCHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV. NO.
AMOUNT
NO.
AMOUNT
ALLEW d ASSOCIATES, INC.
1294
15197.03 *
ILLIAM S. BUCK
1295
60.00 *
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
267
100.00 *
ICTAPHONE CORPORATION
1279
.00 *
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
1287
1027.41 *
FRED DOMINGUEZ
1296
60.00 *
EXPRESS BLUEPRINTING
1285
96.08 *
HARPER d BURNS
1280
361.25 *
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF
1281
250.00 *
HE KEITH COMPANIES
1297
11970.93 *
HE KEITH COMPANIES
1283
5935.89 *
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
1298
7997.06 *
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
1299
34.51 *
AKE ELSINORE TRAVEL SERVICE
1300
108.00 *
ETER J. LEHR
1301
3000.00 *
.J.M. DESIGN GROUP, INC.
1282
3540.00 *
ECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK
1288
475.28 *
ILL STARKEY
1302
60.00 *
ARY WASHBURN
1303
30.00 *
EDIN ENTERPRISES
1304
3687.50 4
EDIN ENTERPRISES
1284
3687.50 a
EDIN ENTERPRISES
286
2312.00 8
AGENDA ITEMyy NO—3-C,
PAGE_1_._ OF—a—
LAKE ELSINORE-RDA
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-081
PAGE NO. 2
DATE 02/28/90
HER
J.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'0
INV. NO.
AMOUNT
NO,
AMOUNT
IM WINKLER
1305
60.00
*
HARCHOL/HARTMAN 6 ASSOC.
1306
1511.88
*
AIN STREET BAKERY
289
35.00
*
HE FITZGERALD REPORT
268
48.00
*
HRISTENSEN AND WALLACE
1307
1229.58
*
AGENDA ITEM NO. � A ..
E OF 3
PAG
LAKE ELSINORE-RDA
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 90-081
PAYEE
PAGE NO
DATE
3
02/28/90
WARRANTCHECK
AGENDA ITEM NO. I' L
PAGE OF,l.
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENIEU WWI, I CSV
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'0
INV, NO.
AMOUNT NO.
AMOUNT
RITTEN
45006.49
REPAID
17868.41
CCRUED
.00
OTAL
62874.90
RECAP BY FUND
RE-PAIQ
RITTEN
OPERATING FUND - AREA I
910
3995.46
17630.08
CONSTRUCTION FUND - AREA
911
3540.00
3311.88
OPERATING FUND - AREA II
920
3960.48
9633.02
CONSTRUCTION FUND - AREA
921
.00
3000.00
OPERATING FUND - AREA 111
930
6372.47
11431.51
AGENDA ITEM NO. I' L
PAGE OF,l.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON MOLENDYK, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 24624 AND DISCUSSION OF PROJECT REVISIONS -
CENTEX
This matter was continued from the City Council meetings of
February 13 and February 27, 1990 in order for staff to meet
with the neighbors and the applicant to work out some issues
relative to buffer parcel sizes, minimum lot sizes,
circulation issues, view protection for properties along
Vista View, and other issues as indicated in the February 27,
1990 memo from Ron Molendyk to the City Council.
Following is a list of project revisions which were worked
out between the neighbors and the project proponents:
1. Mango Street will be conditioned to be barricaded
until such time that the extension of "I" Street is
completed through the Pacific Scene property to the
north
2. The lots located immediately adjacent to Vista View
will be larger and approximately 18 to 20 feet deeper
than previously proposed, which should help protect
views. The finished grades will also be lower than
the previous plans by 2 or 3 feet. The resultant lots
will be at least 7,200 square feet in size and more in
compliance with the 75% buffer provisions of the code.
3. A proposed condition of approval will limit large
commercial vehicles on the "I" Street extension north
of Grand Avenue.
4. Small lots located adjacent to Vista View will be
limited to single -story structures to protect views
(see attached conditions of approval).
5. The applicant will be conditioned to enter into an
agreement to resolve the filling of the drainage ditch
behind Vista View (see attached conditions of
approval).
In summary, it is staffs opinion that all of the neighbors
concerns relative to this project have been resolved. At the
last meeting between the neighbors, the developer, and staff
on this matter, the representatives for the neighbors
indicated that the latest revisions to the plan adequately
addressed their concerns. Both the developer and the
neighborhood representatives had to compromise over the view
issue, the homeowners agreed to accept assurances of balcony
views rather than ground level views and the applicants
increased lot sizes and increased the number of single -story
homes to reduce view impacts.
RECOMMENDATION
it is recommended that the City Council re -affirm
Environmental Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract
Map 24624 based on the findings and subject to the conditions
listed in the February 13, 1990 staff report and new
conditions of approval, and the conditions contained in the
February 13, 1990 staff memo to the Council. 2
AGENDA ITEM NO. J
PAGE OF__J__.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON MOLENDYK, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23988: ORTEGA PARTNERS
This item was continued from the City Council meeting of
February 27, 1990, in order for staff, the applicant,
selected members of the Council, and the neighborhood
representatives to meet and discuss various alternative site
plans.
The developer, at the direction of staff, developed several
scenarios for discussion purposes.
After evaluating the various alternatives and discussing them
with the neighborhood representatives and Councilmembers, the
following scenario emerged as the most feasible:
7,200 square foot minimum parcel sizes with the
large lot buffer along the southeasterly
boundary for a total of 259 lots. This
proposal would also include a small
(approximately one-half acre in size) pocket
park near the proposed fire station site.
Neighborhood representatives, although acknowledging movement
toward a resolution of the issue, could not assure that the
above approach would be acceptable. The developer is
continuing to review the issue, but doubts he is able to
reduce the number of lots further.
It is staff's opinion that the latest revision best addresses -
the concerns of the residents and council relative to
compatibility with surrounding developments.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council re -affirm
Environmental Impact Report 88-2 and approve Tentative Tract
Map 23988 based on the findings and conditions listed in the
February 27, 1990 staff report to the City Council.
JIGENDA ITP!
j PAQE.�,� OFy_
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dave Gunderman, Community Development Director 'lot
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 25442: Doug Reuvers
The applicant has requested that this item be continued until
the March 27, 1990, City Council hearing, in order to resolve
access issues for landlocked parcels northerly and north-
westerly of the site.
AGENDA fTEM NO. 3`�"'
PAGE OF '
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Commercial Project 89-9: Pinnacle
Lakeshore #3, A General Partnership;
a request to construct a commercial
center consisting of three (3)
buildings totaling 28,770 square
feet, located approximately 1,200
feet east of Main Street, north of
Lakeshore Drive.
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED BY
Gabrielle Restivo Dave G derman
Associate Planner Comm. V.
Dir.
APPROVED BY: Q\��
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
At the meeting of February 21, 1990, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of Commercial Project 89-9 by a 4-0
vote, Commissioner Wilsey absent (minutes and staff report
attached). Items discussed included hydroseeding the
existing 1:1 slope, roof mounted equipment, landscape
bonding, the Lakeshore Drive right-of-way, the project
loading area and the blue tile roofing. The conditions of
approval were amended to require erosion control landscaping
in graded areas only, to allow roof mounted equipment behind
a parapet wall, to require the standard landscape bonding, to
uphold engineering right-of-way conditions as submitted, to
require screening of the loading area from the public
right-of-way and to allow the blue tile roofing. The
buildings will be light grey wood siding, dark grey wood trim
and blue tile roofing.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative
Declaration 89-55, and approve Commercial Project 89-9 based
on the findings and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings
1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan.
2. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
3. If the attached conditions are met, this project will
meet the design directives of Chapters 17.44, 17.38,
17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE OFE
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: March 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Industrial Project 90-1: Ed Carlson;
a request to construct an 8,000
square foot industrial building on a
.41 acre site, located approximately
420 feet north of Flint Street, west
of Langstaff.
PREPARED BY: Gabrielle Restivo APPROVED
Gabrielle Restivo Dave nderman
Associate Planner Comm. ev. Dir.
APPROVED BY:
Ron Molendyk
City Manager
BACKGROUND
At the meeting of February 21, 1990, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of Industrial Project 90-1 by a 4-0
vote, Commissioner Wilsey absent (minutes and staff report
attached). The location of the trash enclosure was discussed
relative to the loading area, and the front elevation windows
were discussed. Conditions were revised to allow the trash
enclosure to remain where proposed and to elongate and
consolidate the windows in the "open workshop area". The
industrial building is to be split -face masonry block with a
beige stucco finish and rust colored trim. Office entrance
and window glass is to be clear with dark mullions, the
multi -textured split -face masonry block will be exposed in
bands to provide architectural variations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt Negative
Declaration 90-1, and approve Industrial Project 90-1 based
on the findings and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with
City Council action.
Findings:
1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan.
2. No environmental impacts will result from this project.
3. If the attached conditions are met, this project will
meet the design directives of Chapters 17.38, 17.56,
17.82 and 17.66 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
AGENDA ITEMNO. 1'0'
IPAGE _OF—L—
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: NW SEWER PROJECT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1
PREPARED BY: �1, Y -"Z, APPROVED: � k
Ron Kirchner Ron Molendyk
Director of Public City Manager
Services
BACKGROUND
In April, 1986, petitions were filed with the City Council
requesting the construction of a sewer to serve the property along
Collier Street from Chaney to Nichols. Since that time the project
has been under design and staff is now ready to proceed with the
project development.
FINDINGS
Staff has prepared the necessary engineering and legal documents
to commence the project. Representatives of the engineering
consultant and the Bond Counsel will present the maps, reports and
resolutions and respond to questions as per the attached Order of
Procedure (Exhibit "A"). Copies of the Engineer's Report have been
distributed to the Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
All costs associated with the work are included in the project
costs and will be assessed to the benefited properties. There is
no direct cost to the City.
Vt'll'1 L1V LA11V1V ---
Hear the presentation by the Engineer and Attorney and adopt
resolutions including:
EXHIBIT
Resolution
Making Appointments B
Resolution
Adopting Proposal Boundry Map C
Resolution
of Intention D
Resolution
Passing on "Report" and Setting
Public Hearing E
Resolution
Calling For Construction Bids F
Resolution
Setting Hearing on Eminent Domain
Proceedings G
Resolution
Approving Agreements H
f;G`f DA STEfn NO. 1�'.e-.
PAGE / OF----;--
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
AND THE ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
i = r'
Prepared and Approved by:
Executive Director
BACKGROUND
As you are aware, the Redevelopment Agency Board, as one of their goals, has
established improvement and economic needs in the Downtown Area.
Attached you will find specific programs to be accomplished by the Community
Development Corporation (CDC) for the City of Lake Elsinore, -Redevelopment
Agency, within the Downtown and within the City "Redevelopment Agency Project
Areas". In addition, to the programs outlined in Exhibit A, the Redevelopment
Agency (RDA) Committee feels an additional $1500 should be added for promotion,
advertising and marketing.
RECOMMENDATION
That the attached agreement between the Elsinore Valley Community Development
Corporation and the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency in the amount of
$31,500 be approved.
RM: Id
attachment: Exhibit "A" Mxhibit 1)
Agreement
AGENLM ITEM NO. .
PAGE_ OE,Z
EXHIBIT "A"
ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Purposes and Beneficiaries
A. Definitions
Hereinafter the following terms will be used:
1. The Elsinore Valley Community Development Corporation will
be referred to as the "Corporation".
The Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency will be referred to
as the "RDA".
3. The Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency will be
referred to as the "Executive Director".
4. The County of Riverside will be referred to as the "County"
Purpose and Beneficiaries
The purpose of this project is to carry out specific programs,
projects, and activities designed to encourage, initiate and finance
economic development and redevelopment in the City. These services
will focus on conditions of blight, physical obsolescence, land
underutilization, unemployment, underemployment, poverty, public
dependency, community social and economic disparity. Project
beneficiaries will be those persons including, but not limited to,
the financially handicapped, receiving employment as a result of the
Corporation's efforts and the communities in general where the
development of rehabilitation occur.
Content and Operations.
The Corporation, in the performance of the scope of the work defined
below, will emphasize and give priority to City redevelopment and business
revitalization projects as identified by the Executive Director or his
designee.
Unless otherwise specifically noted to the contrary, the Corporation will
provide the following scope of services, to the extent that it is lawfully
authorized to do so, anywhere within the boundaries of the City Redevelop-
ment Agency.
Inventory of Historical Buildings in the Downtown Area.
The Corporation will research, conduct and update an Historic
Resources Inventory of the Lake Elsinore Downtown Historic District.
This will include, but not be limited to, materials developed by the
State of California Department of Parks and Recreation in a study
completed in 1982. It will recommend priorities as to sites and
buildings appropriate for retention and rehabilitation, as well as
strategies for dealing with these historical buildings. The Corpora-
tion will identify specific landmarks to maintain the goals for Down-
town Revitalization, suggest sources for funding of these projects,
and assist with developing a list of qualified preservation
architects and construction firms. The Corporation will further, at
the RDA's direction, assist with the development of a viable Historic
Preservation Ordinance. A current inventory of historic buildings
will be developed, including photographs of identified structures,
and this will be provided both the RDA and the local historical
society.
AGENDA ITENI NO. EA,
PAGE 2_ OF �
C
0
Exhibit "A"
Page Z
Housing Structure at 138 East Graham Avenue.
The Corporation will research the history and current ownership of
the two-story structure at 138 East Graham Avenue, adjacent to the
Evans -Brown Mortuary. If the structure is determined to be available
for sale, the Corporation will determine the efficacy of rehabilita-
tion or conversion to a higher use than is now the case. Recommenda-
tions as to development of this site within the RDA's goal for the
area will be provided.
Vacant Land at Graham and Chestnut.
The Corporation will research the ownership and availability for sale
of this land consisting of three adjacent parcels. The land, if
available, will be marketed to appropriate builders with an antici-
pation of constructing a quality project which would create the
necessary residential support for the downtown retail area.
Infill Lots.
The Corporation will research additional infill lots, with the
initial target those lots immediately to the east of City Hall. Then
the Corporation will identify ownership of such lots, the terms of
Possible acquisition and the nature of higher utilization. The
Corporation will identify qualified architects and builders as well
as developers, and determine a program of prioritization and funding
of specific projects within the Redevelopment Area under study. The
Corporation, with the assistance of RDA staff, will establish
marketing guidelines within existing City/RDA standards and examine
the potential value of a Housing Authority with resultant CC&R's and
goals. The Corporation will further contact the Lake Elsinore Unified
School District, the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, and
other interested entities with the goal of establishing certain
incentives for those who invest in the rehabilitation of existing
structures and the construction of appropriate new structures within
the guidelines of a RDA -adopted theme. The Corporation will research
funding sources to include, but not be limited to, Federal, State and
County programs.
Special Programs.
The Corporation will undertake several special programs at the
request of the RDA which will utilize Corporation staff, resources
and expertise. These programs will supplement and implement existing
RDA programs and projects and will result in recommendations to the
RDA for action, when circumstances show such a need. Additional
programs may be suggested from time to time, but those to be
considered under this Contract are as follows:
Displaced Citizenry.
The Corporation will review the circumstances of those local
citizens who may be in need of relocation due to the redevelop-
ment of rehabilitation of existing structures in the area under
study. Alternate housing opportunities will be researched and
recommendations made as to feasible means of accomplishing
these goals.
Housing authority.
The Corporation will research the establishment of a local
Housing Authority in cooperation with RDA staff. This will
include development of standards, funding and enforcement of
regulations.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 5' OF—/ Z
Exhibit "A"
Page 3
3. Day Workers.
The RDA and Corporation recognize that the current practice of
having day workers congregate on various corners awaiting offers
of employment is not satisfactory and merits review. The
Corporation will research practices of other similar communities
in dealing with this situation and make recommendations as to
viable alternatives. This will include the identification of
potential sites for location of a common day worker employment
site with the establishment of a suitable restroom facility,
shelter and/or benches. Cooperation of the Chamber of Commerce
in this project and possible Immigration Service input will be
sought.
4. Neighborhood Enhancement Program.
The Corporation will develop, with the cooperation of the RDA,
guidelines for enhancement of various targeted neighborhoods
within the community. This will involve recommendations for a
"Paint-up/Fix-up" campaign, with incentives for upgrading
existing structures involving painting, roofing, etc. The
possibility of providing donated materials and/or labor from
available sources will be explored.
Resource Bank.
The Corporation will research the efficacy of establishing a
tool loan bank to provide assistance to citizens desiring to
improve their property, but lacking the necessary tools to
accomplish this task. The Corporation will further work with
the RDA to establish color codes to meet established standards
and monitor work so as to meet these guidelines. This will be
carried out in conjunction with "4" above.
3. Monitoring and Assessment
Ongoing assessment of this project will be conducted by the RDA. The
Corporation will submit a final report to the RDA at the end of the
project period and will provide to the extent requested by the. RDA, all
monthly financial documentation, monthly written progress reports (2
copies each) and meet monthly with RDA staff. These reports will outline
all successes and problems toward accomplishing the work project required
above. Any required monthly report will be submitted in a format provided
by the RDA. At least once each month of the project period, the Corpora-
tion staff will meet with RDA staff and others as deemed necessary and
appropriate by the RDA for the purpose of briefing RDA personnel regarding
the progress of the project. These meetings shall be at a place and time
mutually agreed upon. In addition to the formal reports identified, close
liaison will be maintained with the RDA to ensure timely and appropriate
completion of the required effort.
The RDA will also assess project operations, including:
a) Completion of project tasks on schedule and in compliance with
this Contract.
b) Overall project management; and,
c) Achievement of goals and objectives.
4. Project Administration
The Corporation is responsible for delivering the identified products
within the Contract period and may be assisted in completing specified
work tasks by subcontractors.
AGENDA ITEM NO,
PAGE OF/2--
Q102
Exhibit "A"
Page 4
Legal Review of Documents
The RDA Attorney will review as to form and legality all project contracts
and/or binding legal agreements where the County or the City is a party to
the contract or agreement. The Corporation shall not be liable for the
form of said contracts or agreements once approved as to form and legality
by the RDA Attorney.
Delav in Project Progress
In the event the Corporation encounters difficulty in meeting performance
requirements, or anticipates difficulty in complying with the Contract
delivery schedule or date, or whenever the Corporation has knowledge that
any actual or potential situation is delaying or threatens to delay the
timely performance of this Contract, the Corporation shall immediately
notify the RDA in writing, giving pertinent details. In the event the
subject delay is the responsibility of the RDA or other entity not
associated with the Corporation, the Corporation shall be entitled to an
equitable adjustment of the time. The RDA will respond to a "Notice of
Delay" within ten (10) working days of receipt of the Notice.
Additional Insurance
The Corporation shall secure and maintain a comprehensive blanket crime
policy, in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)
insuring against loss of money, securities, or other property referred to
hereunder which may result from (a) dishonesty or fraudulent acts of
officers, Directors, employees (commercial blanket form) of the Corpora-
tion; or (b) disappearance, destruction or wrongful abstraction inside or
outside the premises of the Corporation while in the care, custody or
control of the Corporation; or (c) sustained through forgery or alteration
of checks, drafts or any order or direction to pay a certain sum of money.
Said policy shall be primary to any other similar insurance and shall
include a loss payee endorsement naming the RDA as its interests may
appear.
The insurance carrier shall be satisfactory to the RDA and certificates
evidencing such insurance, along with significant endorsement, shall be
delivered to the RDA and shall stipulate that the RDA is to be given at
least thirty (30) days written notice in advance of any modification or
cancellation.
Project Budget
See Exhibit "1" attached to this Exhibit "A and incorporated herein by
this reference.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE_„LOF_Z_LZ_
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT BUDGET
ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
A. Inventory of Historical Buildings in the Downtown Area
Budget for Completed Study $10,000.00
B. Housing Structure
Budget for Completed Study 2,500.00
C. Vacant Land
Budget for Completed Study 5,000.00
D. Infill Lots
Budget for Completed Study 5,000.00
E. Special Programs
Budget for Completed Study 7,500.00
TOTAL FOR PROPOSED PROJECTS; $30,000.00
Page 5
It is proposed that an initial funding in the amount of twenty (20) percent of
the Contract ($6,000.00) be made to the Corporation from the Agency with
incremental funding in the amount of $4,000.00 per month for the five month
period anticipated in completing the above projects. The initial funding would
be due and payable on the occasion of the signing of the mutually accepted
document and the commencement of work on the project by the Corporation.
AGENDA ITEN1 NO. 5,A,
PAGE L OF 12—
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND THE
ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
This Agreement is made and entered into this
day of
1990, by and between the Lake Elsinore Redevelopment
Agency, hereinafter "AGENCY", and the Elsinore Valley Community Development
Corporation (hereinafter "CORPORATION"), and is made with reference to the
following facts:
RECITALS
A. There is community need and interest in programs, projects and
activities designed to encourage and improve economic development in Lake
Elsinore, to create jobs and ameliorate conditions of unemployment, poverty,
dependency, community tensions and social and economic disparity.
B. The Agency, pursuant to Government Code, is authorized to expend
funds for services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth
herein.
C. The Corporation assists the Agency in its ongoing economic
development efforts.
D. The Corporation is qualified by reason of experience, preparation and
organization to provide the services set forth in this Contract and, further,
the Corporation is Authorized by virtue of its incorporation pursuant to the
California Nonprofit Corporation Law to provide the services contemplated in
this Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth
and the mutual benefits to be arrived therefrom, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Corporation is to perform all of the
services in the Project Description specifically related to the providing of
low and moderate income housing assistance in the downtown area, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference
(hereinafter "Services").
AGENDA I T E&q NO.—LA,
PAGE, OF�
2. Time of Performance. The performance of the Services are to
commence on , 1990, and shall be completed pursuant
to that schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
3. Budget Section. No more than the amount specified in Exhibit "A"
may be spent for the separate cost categories without written approval of the
Executive Director.
4. Contract Administration. The Executive Director or designee shall
have full authority to act for the Agency in the administration of this
Contract consistent with provisions contained herein.
5. Benefits to the Agency; Right to Offer Services to Others. As
consideration for providing Contract administration services herein, the
Corporation will provide the services identified in Paragraph 1, entitled
"Scope of Services", on a priority basis to Agency projects, ad identified by
the Executive Director or designee.
Corporation, subject to its duty to provide its services to the Agency's
projects on a priority basis, may enter into such other contracts and
agreements to make its services available to others as it may desire.
6. Use of Funds. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Contract, no funds provided by the Agency shall be expended for the private
benefit of any project applicant for a project administered by the Corporation
nor in any other way in violation of Section 6, Article XVI, of the California
Constitution proscribing gifts or loans of public funds for private purposes.
Contract funds shall not be used as security or to guarantee payments for any
non -program obligations, nor as loans for non -program activities.
7. Termination and Termination Costs. This Contract may be
terminated for any reason at any time by the Corporation or Agency upon giving
sixty (60) days notice in writing to the other. The Executive Director is
hereby empowered to give said notice.
8. Conflict of Interest. The Corporation, its agents and employees
shall comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations and
County ordinances governing Conflict of Interest. The Corporation and the
Agency, each acknowledge that Gary Washburn is currently a City Councilmember
as well as a member of the Corporation. Since there is no economic advantage
available to Gary Washburn as a result of being either a City Councilmember or
a member of the corporation, the parties to this Agreement do not believe that
the situation created a Conflict of Interest. However, to the extent that such
_2
AGENDA ITEM
NO. A
PAGE '�2E OFL
a Conflict of Interest is deemed to exist, the parties of this Agreement never-
theless consent to Gary Washburn's performance of his duties as both a City
Councilmember and a member of this Corporation, to the same extent as though
he held either, but not both, of said positions.
9. Discrimination. No person shall, on the grounds of race, sex,
creed, color, religion, or national origin, be excluded from participating in,
be refused the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in any
activities, programs, or employment by this Contract.
10. Independent Contractor. All parties hereto in the performance of
this Contract will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents,
employees, partners, joint venturers, or associates of one another. The
employees or agents of one party shall not be deemed or construed to be the
agents or employees of the other party for any purpose whatever.
11. Amendments. Except as herein provided, additional variation of
the terms of this Contract shall not be valid unless made in the form of a
written amendment to this Contract formally approved and executed by all
parties.
12. Monitoring and Evaluation. The Agency will monitor, evaluate and
provide guidance to the Corporation in the performance of this Contract.
Authorized representatives of the Agency shall have the right of access to all
activities and facilities operated by the Corporation under this Contract.
Facilities include all files, records and other documents related to the
performance of this Contract. Activities include attendance at staff, Board of
Directors, advisory committee and advisory board meetings and observation of
ongoing program functions. The Corporation will insure the cooperation of its
staff and board members in such efforts. The Executive Director or designee
will conduct periodic program progress reviews. These reviews will focus on
the extent to which the planned program has been implemented and measurable
goals achieved, effectiveness of program management and the overall impact of
the Community Development Corporation's program.
Nothing herein shall allow the Agency or any person or entity acting on
its behalf access to confidential information (whether financial or otherwise)
of the clients of the Corporation (including participants in the programs being
conducted pursuant to the terms of this Contract), without the express written
consent of the effected client.
-3-
AGENDA ITE,I NO. �
PAGE GF �� ..
13. Audits, Accounting and Audit Exceptions.
(a) The Corporation's program will be audited in accordance with the
Agency's policy of funding guidelines. The Agency, or their authorized
representatives, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
Agency may reasonably deem necessary, have all books, documents, papers,
records, property and premises of the Corporation relating to the performance
of this Contract.
(b) The Corporation agrees that in the event the program established
herein is subjected to audit exceptions by appropriate Agency,. County, State or
Federal agencies, it shall be responsible for complying with such exceptions
and paying the Agency the full amount of the Agency's Tiability to the County,
State or Federal Government resulting from such audit exceptions.
14. Indemnification.
(a) The Corporation agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless
the County and the Agency, their agents, officers and employees from and
against any and all liability, expense, including defense costs and legal fees,
and claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to,
bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage arising from or
connected with the Corporation's operations, or its services hereunder.
15. Compliance with Laws. The parties agree to be bound by all
applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, regulations and
directives insofar as they pertain to the performance of this Contract.
16. No Waiver. No waiver or any breach or default hereunder shall be
considered valid unless in writing, and no such waiver shall be deemed a waiver
of any subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature.
17. Invalidity. If any provision of this Contract shall be invalid or
unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall attach only to such
provision and shall not in any matter affect or render invalid or uneforceable
any other severable provision of this Contract, and this Contract shall be
carried out as if any such invalid or unenforceable provision were not
contained herein.
18. Notice. All notices or demands of any kind which may be required
to be service under the terms of this Contract shall be in writing and shall be
deemed service when personally delivered or five (5) days after being mailed by
-4-
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE A-2 OF-,Z�
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
AGENCY LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Attention: Ron Molendyk
Executive Director
CORPORATION ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
P. 0. Box 59
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Attention: John Matson, President
Board of Directors
Any party may change the address set forth herein by giving written notice
of said change to all parties.
19. Assignability. The Corporation shall not assign any interest in
this Contract (whether by assignment or novation) without the prior written
consent of the Agency.
20. Publication Reproduction and Use of Material. No material
produced, in whole or in part, under this Contract shall be subject to
copyright in the United States or in any other country. The Agency shall have
the unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use,
in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this
Contract. All reports, data and other materials prepared under this Contract
shall be the property of the Agency upon completion of this Contract.
21. Governing Law. This Contract shall be construed and interpreted
according to the laws of the State of California.
22. Complete Agreement. It is expressly understood and agreed that
this Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the Elsinore Valley
Community Development Corporation and the Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency
and in no event shall the Corporation be entitled to any compensation,
benefits, reimbursements or ancillary services other than as herein expressly
provided.
This Contract is entered into and is effective on the date set forth
above.
-5-
AGENDA IT&A NO. S,k
\ PAGE
ATTEST:
Ron Molendyk, Secretary of Agency
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
John R. Harper, Agency Attorney
/ld
g103
AGENCY
LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
By.
Gary Washburn, Chairperson
CORPORATION
ELSINORE VALLEY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AGENDA ITEM NO. _sL
'N PAGE ��—OF 12—