HomeMy WebLinkAbout0016_0_Text FileText File
City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
www.lake-elsinore.org
File Number: ID# 16-478
Agenda Date: 12/13/2016 Status: Public HearingVersion: 1
File Type: ReportIn Control: City Council
Agenda Number: 15)
Page 1 City of Lake Elsinore Printed on 12/8/2016
Page 1 of 5
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
To:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From:Grant Yates, City Manager
Prepared by: Justin Kirk, Principal Planner
Date:December 13, 2016
PROJECT: Planning Application 2016-38:A proposed subdivision of two (2) lots
into four (4) lots and the reconfiguration of the adjacent right of way and
the development of 95,000 square feet of commercial space distributed
between eight buildings and one (1) residential unit on a vacant 11.27
acres lot located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga
APPLICANT:Jeff Pomeroy, Civic Partners
Recommendation
aDOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN EIR (SCH 2009031084)
ADDENDUM #2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION 2016-38 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37253,
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2016-07, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2016-22).
aDOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT PLANNING APPLICATION 2016-38 (TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 37253 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2016-07) ARE CONSISTENT
WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP); AND,
aDOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37253 PROVIDING FOR THE
SUBDIVISION OF 2 LOTS INTO FOUR (4) LOTS AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE
ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY; AND,
aDOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2016-07 PROVIDING
BUILDING DESIGNS FOR 95,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE DISTRIBUTED
BETWEEN EIGHT BUILDINGS; AND,
Page 2 of 5
aDOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2016-22 PROVIDING
BUILDING DESIGNS FOR ONE (1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
Discussion
Project Location
The project site is located on 11.27 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Diamond
Drive and Malaga Road. The site contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers
(APNs) 365-280-022 and 373-210-041.
Environmental Setting
EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Project Site Vacant Land Specific Plan Specific Plan
North Vacant Specific Plan Specific Plan
South Residential Specific Plan,Specific Plan
East Commercial CMU CMU
West Baseball Stadium Specific Plan Specific Plan
Background
The Planning Commission took action to unanimously recommend approval of the proposed
project.
Project Description
Tentative Parcel Map
A proposed subdivision of 2 lots into 4 four lots which measure in size as follows; 144,767 SF (Lot
1), 75,398 SF (Lot 2), 83,981 SF (Lot 3), and 180,253 SF (Lot 4) and the reconfiguration of the
adjacent right of way.
CDR/RDR
The Project includes construction of 95,000 SF of commercial space and one (1) live-work
dwelling unit. The proposed site plan has identified a hotel, however it is not being processed as
part of the current Design Review application. The commercial space would include a combination
of retail, restaurant, and brewery uses. The project proposes nine buildings. Seven of the
buildings would be single-story. One structure would contain a second story housing a single
dwelling unit. The concept plan for the hotel assumes four stories.
A cluster of five buildings (Buildings 1-5), including 46,400 SF of commercial space, would be
clustered around a public plaza at the southwest corner of the site. To the east, across a parking
area, would be one building (Building 6) with a row of commercial uses totaling 38,600 SF,
including a major retailer with a 20,000 SF store. The northerly portion of the site would contain
the hotel (Building 7) and two pads for commercial uses, covering 4,000 SF and 6,000 SF
(Buildings 8 and 9, respectively). The project includes pole-mounted LED parking lot lights,
security lighting, sign lighting, and halo façade lighting. A 6-foot-tall masonry wall is proposed
Page 3 of 5
along the site’s eastern boundary, replacing an existing chain-link fence separating the site from
the Lake Elsinore Town Center shopping center.
The project, excluding the hotel site, would include a minimum of 49,000 SF of landscaping and
37,000 SF of pedestrian plaza space1. The Conceptual Landscape Plan, provides a detailed view
of the overall project site and proposed landscaping and vegetation. Various tree species are
proposed along public streets, within parking areas, as specimens in entry and plaza areas, as
accent trees, and as screen trees. Various shrub species are proposed as groundcovers. The
hotel site would include similar types and density of plantings. Stormwater would be managed
onsite via a combination of aboveground and underground facilities. Bioretention basins would
receive a portion of the site’s drainage. The bioretention facility is a shallow vegetated basin
underlain by engineering soil media. The remainder of the site’s drainage would flow to an
underground infiltration system with Continuous Deflection System (CDS) pretreatment, which
screens and traps debris, sediment, oil and grease from stormwater prior to the infiltration system.
The underground infiltration system is series of chambers which allow infiltration into the
surrounding soil. Connections to existing storm drain lines below Diamond Drive and Malaga
Road would be provided.
The project site is accessible via I-I5 from the Diamond Drive offramp, as well as from the regional
arterial Mission Trail, via Malaga Road. Five driveways would provide access to the site, including
two from Diamond Drive and three from Malaga Road. A total of 572 parking spaces are
distributed across the center of the site. Pedestrian access would be from sidewalks along
Diamond Drive and Malaga Road, which connect to a system of on-site walkways and plazas.
The main cluster of buildings (Buildings 1-5) at the southwest corner of the site is directly
accessible from sidewalks on both Diamond Drive and Malaga Road; Building 6 is connected to
the main cluster via an on-site walkway. The hotel and pads located north of the main cluster
(Buildings 7-9) are also accessible via walkway and sidewalk. The project would include bicycle
parking areas in compliance with the California Green Building Standards Code. Bicyclists would
have access to Class II bike lanes along both Diamond Drive and Malaga Road, which connect
to a broader system of bicycle routes across Lake Elsinore. Public transportation to the site would
be provided by Riverside Transit Agency bus service (Route 8), with bus stops on Mission Trail.
Analysis
General Plan
The Project has a General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan. As a requirement of any
adopted Specific Plan, specific findings must be included in the Specific Plan which document
consistency with the General Plan. These findings are included in Chapter 7 of the adopted
Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1. Because the proposed project has been found to be
consistent with both the LEMC and the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1, no further
consistency analysis with the General Plan is required and the Project has been found to be
consistent with the General Plan.
LEMC and Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1
The Project has a zoning designation of Specific Plan and is located in the Mixed Use area of the
Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1. The Project is located in Planning Area (PA) 5, which
identifies a total of 110,000 SF of commercial space and 50 residential units. The Diamond
Specific Plan Amendment #1 largely supersedes the LEMC, save for those areas identified in the
1 This includes 16,974 square feet of public plaza space and 20,026 square feet of pedestrian plaza space
Page 4 of 5
Specific Plan or those areas that are omitted. Breweries, retail uses (including food stores), and
restaurants and eating places are identified as a permitted uses. While the future hotel use was
not identified in the PA 5, a 150 room hotel was identified in PA 3. The Diamond Specific Plan
does permit the transfer of uses from one planning area to another, so the future hotel use is
consistent with the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1. Table 1-1 details the Project’s
consistency with the applicable Development Standards identified in the Diamond Specific Plan
Amendment #1.
Table 1-1
Development Standard Required/Limit Proposed
Building Height2 5 Stories/60’-0”2 Stories/38’-0”
Front Setback3 10’-0”10’-0”
Side Setback (Interior)0’-0”8’-9”
Side Setback (Malaga)0’-0”12’-0”
Rear Setback 5’-0”29’-0”
Lot Area Minimum No minimum 1.73 Acres
4
FAR5 0.8 0.326
Density (Residential)18 du/ac .3 du/ac
Public Plazas 10% (9,500 SF)18% (16,974 SF)
The Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1 defers regulation of the minimum parking
requirements to the LEMC. Due to the unique nature of the proposed uses, specifically the
brewery component, the uses of those areas were broken up into specific uses (brewing, retail
sales, restaurant front and back of house). For the brewing specific uses the applicable parking
calculation was the manufacturing designation, which translates to one (1) space per 500 square
feet of area. The retail sales component is most applicable with the commercial uses requirement
of one (1) space per 250 square feet of area. The eating and drinking component is applicable
with restaurants, which have a requirement of one (1) space for each 45 square feet of customer
area, plus one (1) space for each 200 square feet of noncustomer area. Table 1-2 details the total
parking requirements for the proposed project.
Table 1-2
Use Area Parking Calculation Allocation of Space Parking Requirements
Breweries
24,500
0.0020 50%25
Breweries 0.0040 10%9
Breweries 0.0222 10%54
Breweries 0.0050 30%36
Restaurants 17,000 0.0222 40%151
Restaurants 0.0050 60%51
Retail 53,500 0.0040 100%214
Total 95,000 540
2 An additional 15’-0” is allowed for architectural projections such as towers
3 Front of Building to Public Street
4 Smallest of the four parcels
5 Floor area ratio” means the numerical value obtained by dividing the gross floor area of a building or
buildings located upon a lot or parcel of land by the total net area of such lot or parcel of land.
6 Highest individual FAR of the proposed project, total project FAR is .32
Page 5 of 5
The proposed project incorporates a total of 572 parking spaces, thus meeting the minimum
requirements of the LEMC. When an application for a hotel is made, the parking demand of the
additional use will be analyzed and the necessity for additional parking (reciprocal parking
agreement, addition of more parking spaces, or a parking study).
Overall the proposed development creates a unique uses to the Diamond Specific Plan. The
proposed architectural style compliments the surrounding areas. The proposed project has been
reviewed by the Building, Engineering, Finance, and Fire divisions and adequate Conditions of
Approval have been applied to mitigate any potential impacts associated with the development.
Environmental Determination
The City of Lake Elsinore, California, City Council, approved the Diamond Specific Plan on July
13, 2010 (Ordinance No. CC- 2010 -1278). As a component of that action, the City Council
certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse # 2009031084). The
City of Lake Elsinore, California, City Council, approved the first amendment to the Diamond
Specific Plan on May 26, 2015 (Ordinance No. CC 2015 -1340). As component of that action the
City Council found that the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 remained consistent and
implemented the development anticipated by the certified EIR for the Diamond Specific Plan and
no additional environmental review was required. In order to review any potential impacts of the
Project, an addendum to the certified EIR was prepared. The addendum did not find any new
significant impacts associated with the Project that would result in the necessity to prepare any
further Environmental documents.
Fiscal Impact
The time and costs related to processing this project have been covered by the Developer Deposit
paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing
of this application. The approval of the Project does not fiscally impact the City’s General Fund.
Mitigation Measures to protect the City fiscally have already been included in the Conditions of
Approval.
Exhibits:
A. CEQA Resolution
B. MSHCP Resolution
C. TPM Resolution
D. CDR Resolution
E. RDR Resolution
F. Conditions of Approval
G. Addendum #2
H. Vicinity Map
I.Aerial Map
J. Project Plans
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF THE DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN EIR (SCH
2009031084) ADDENDUM #2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION 2016-38 (TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 37253, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2016-02, RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN REVIEW 2016-22).
Whereas, Jeff Pomeroy, on behalf of Civic Partners, has submitted an application for Tentative
Parcel Map providing for the subdivision of two (2) lots into four (4) lots and the reconfiguration of
the adjacent right of way, Commercial Design Review, which would approve architectural plans
for 95,000 square feet of commercial space distributed between eight buildings, and a Residential
Design Review, which would approve one (1) residential unit. The Project site is located on 11.27
acres generally located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The site
contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-022 and 373-210-
041; and,
Whereas, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: “CEQA”) and the State Implementation Guidelines
for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: “CEQA Guidelines”)
because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the
environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and
involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or
more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and,
Whereas, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No.
2009031084: the “EIR”) to address the potential environmental impacts of the Diamond Specific
Plan pursuant to CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Procedures for Implementing the
CEQA Guidelines and its other procedures relating to environmental evaluation of public and
private projects; and,
Whereas, on December 13, 2011 the City Council (Council) of the City of Lake Elsinore (City)
certified the EIR with Responses to Comments, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and,
Whereas, the potential environmental impacts of the Diamond Specific Plan were evaluated in
the certified EIR; and,
Whereas, an Initial Study/Addendum to the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) was
prepared to provide an evaluation of potential site-specific environmental effects that could result
from the proposed Project, compared those effects to what was disclosed by the EIR and
concluded that the significant effects that would result from the Project have been addressed in
the earlier certified EIR; and,
Whereas, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Initial Study/Addendum provides
some changes and additions to the certified EIR and therefore constitutes Addendum 2 to the
Diamond Specific Plan EIR; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Sections 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 of the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment 1 (SPA)
the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making
recommendations to the Council for Tentative Maps and Design Review Applications; and,
CC Reso No. 2016-_______
Page 2 of 4
Whereas, on December 6, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Commission has considered
evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.168 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC) the Council of the City has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify
or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit
applications; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.2 (Design Review) of the SPA the Council of the City has the
responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the
Planning Commission for Commercial Design Review applications; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.3 (Tentative Maps) of the SPA the Council of the City has the
responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the
Commission for parcel maps; and,
Whereas,on December 13, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Meeting, the Council has considered
the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed Addendum 2 to the
Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084), the CEQA documents, and the evidence received
to date, does determine as follows:
1.In accordance with Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Project
does not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require
subsequent or supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to
the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the
proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA
Guidelines, an Initial Study/Addendum to the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH
2009031084) was prepared to provide an evaluation of potential site-specific
environmental effects that could result from the proposed Project, compared those
effects to what was disclosed by the EIR and concluded that the significant effects
that would result from the Project have been addressed in the earlier certified EIR.
The Initial Study/Addendum constitutes Addendum 2 to the Diamond Specific Plan
EIR (SCH 2009031084).
2.That Addendum 2 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and
the CEQA Guidelines.
3.That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis
included in the Addendum 2, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or
15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or
supplemental Environmental Impact Report have occurred; specifically:
CC Reso No. 2016-_______
Page 3 of 4
a. There have not been any changes to the land use designations of the Diamond
Specific Plan that require major revisions of the CEQA documents because of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects;
b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the
circumstances under which the proposed Project is undertaken that require
major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; or
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known
and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at
the time the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) was adopted, that
shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one or more significant
effects not discussed in the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084);
(b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe
than shown in Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084); (c) mitigation
measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) would substantially
reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 2. The Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who
have reviewed Addendum 2 to the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084). The
Commission hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed.
Section 3. The Council hereby finds that Addendum 2 to the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH
2009031084) for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the
CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s procedures for implementation of CEQA.
Section 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, the Council adopts
Addendum 1 to the Diamond Specific Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) for Planning Application 2016-
38 (Tentative Parcel Map 37253, Commercial Design Review 2016-07, and Residential Design
Review 2016-22).
Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of December 2016:
Brian Tisdale, Mayor
Attest:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
CC Reso No. 2016-_______
Page 4 of 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE }SS
I, Susan M. Domen, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2016- ___ as adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular
meeting held on the 13th day of December 2016, and that the same was adopted by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT PLANNING APPLICATION 2016-38
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37253 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2016-07)
ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
Whereas, Jeff Pomeroy, on behalf of Civic Partners, has submitted an application for Tentative
Parcel Map providing for the subdivision of two (2) lots into four (4) lots and the reconfiguration of
the adjacent right of way, Commercial Design Review, which would approve architectural plans
for 95,000 square feet of commercial space distributed between eight buildings, and a Residential
Design Review, which would approve one (1) residential unit. The project site is located on 11.27
acres generally located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The site
contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-022 and 373-210-
041; and,
Whereas,Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) requires that all projects which are proposed on land covered by an MSHCP
criteria cell and which require discretionary approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake
Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and a Joint Project Review (JPR) between the City and the
Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) prior to public review of the Project applications; and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 further requires that discretionary development projects be analyzed
pursuant to the MSHCP “Plan Wide Requirements” even if not within an MSHCP criteria cell; and,
Whereas, the Project is discretionary in nature and requires review and approval by the Planning
Commission (Commission) and City Council (Council); and,
Whereas,a portion of the Project is within MSHCP Criteria Cell 4743 and the entire Project is
within the Elsinore Plan Area of the MSHCP, and therefore, the Project was reviewed pursuant to
the MSHCP “Plan Wide Requirements”; and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency findings prior to
approving any discretionary project entitlements for development of property that is subject to the
MSHCP; and,
Whereas,on December 6, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Planning Commission has
considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested
parties with respect to this item.
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.2 (Design Review) of the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment
1 (SPA) the Council of the City has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or
disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for Commercial Design Review
applications; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.3 (Tentative Maps) of the SPA the Council of the City has the
responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the
Planning Commission for parcel maps; and,
CC Reso No. 2016-___
Page 2 of 5
Whereas,on December 13, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Meeting, the Council has considered
the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed applications and their
consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to the adoption of Findings of Consistency
with the MSHCP for the Project.
Section 2. That in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and the
MSHCP, Findings for adoption have been made as follows:
1.The proposed project is a project under the City’s MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP Consistency Finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution, prior to approving any
discretionary entitlement, the City is required to review the Project to ensure
consistency with the MSHCP criteria and other "Plan Wide Requirements." The
Project, as proposed, was found to be consistent with the MSHCP criteria. In
addition, the Project was reviewed and found consistent with the following "Plan
Wide Requirements". Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas
and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP § 6.2), 1.Protection of Narrow Endemic
Species MSHCP § 6.3), 1.Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP § 6.4),
1.Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP § 6.1), 3.Additional Survey Needs and Procedures
(MSHCP § 6.2), 3. Fuels Management (MSHCP § 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP
Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance § 4.0).
2.The proposed Project is subject to the City’s LEAP and the County’s Joint Project
Review processes.
Portions of the Project site are located within Criteria Cell 4743 (within Subunit 3 -
Elsinore), the Criteria Species Survey Area, the Burrowing Owl Survey Area, and
Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area 2 of the MSHCP. The Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2009031084) determined that
development of the Diamond Specific Plan (DSP), including the Project site, would
be consistent with the MSHCP with the implementation of mitigation measures DSP-
BIO-1 through DSP-BIO-7 as described above and with the implementation of
mitigation measures DSP-BIO-8 and DSP-BIO-9, which would ensure that the
potential for noise impacts associated with construction and operation of the DSP on
adjacent conservation areas would reduce urban/wildland interface impacts to below
a level of significance. These findings were corroborated by the Regional
Conservation Authority (RCA) MSHCP Consistency Determination issued during the
Joint Project Review (JPR 09- 2007-1) process completed on February 2, 2010,
which was attached to the Final EIR SCH# 2009031084.
3.The proposed Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pools Guidelines.
CC Reso No. 2016-___
Page 3 of 5
Section 6.21.of the MSHCP focuses on protection of riparian/riverine areas and
vernal pool habitat types based upon their value in the conservation of a number of
MSHCP covered species. All potential impacts to riparian/riverine areas will be
mitigated as identified in the Determination of Biological Equivalent or Superior
Preservation DBESP) completed by PCR, dated June 15, 2009, and updated
November 17, 2009. There are no vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat on the Project
Site, and therefore, the Project is consistent with Section 6.21.of the MSHCP.
4.The proposed Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
The Project Site is located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area
NEPSSA) for Munz's onion, San Diego Ambrosia, many-stemmed dudleya,
spreading navarretia, California orcutt grass, Hamlett's clay-cress and Wright's
trichocoronis as mapped in Section 6.31.of the MSHCP. The Site was surveyed for
suitable habitat for these NEPSSA plants. Based on the Biological Resources
Assessment dated November 17, 2009, none of the NEPSSA plants were observed
on the Site. Therefore, the Project demonstrates compliance with the provisions of
Section 6.3.
5.The proposed Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures.
The Project is located within the Criteria Area Species Survey Area (CASSA) for
several criteria area plants and the Burrowing Owl survey area as identified in
Section 6.23. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP. Surveys
were conducted on the entire Project Site, and the results indicated that two plant
species, the smooth tarplant and little mousetail are present on the Project Site. The
smooth tarplant and little mousetail will be relocated to on and off-site mitigation
areas which will provide adequate long-term protection of these species. No
Burrowing Owls occupied the Project Site. As such, the Project is consistent with
Section 6.23.of the MSHCP.
6.The proposed Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Section 6.41.of the MSHCP sets forth guidelines which are intended to address
indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP
Conservation Area, where applicable. Future Development in proximity to the
MSHCP Conservation Area may result in Edge Effects that will adversely affect
biological resources within the MSHCP Conservation Area. To minimize such Edge
Effects, guidelines shall be implemented in conjunction with review of individual
public and private Development projects in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation
Area. Through implementation of mitigation measures the Project will minimize the
identified potential indirect impacts with potential future open space. As such, the
Project is consistent with Section 6.41.of the MSHCP.
7.The proposed Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
CC Reso No. 2016-___
Page 4 of 5
Vegetation mapping was conducted as part of the biological surveys conducted on
the entire Project Site and is consistent with the MSHCP Section 6.13.Vegetation
Mapping requirements.
8.The proposed Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The Fuels Management Guidelines presented in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are
intended to address brush management activities around new development within
or adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area and shall be implemented as part of
the Project. As such, the Project is consistent with the Fuels Management
Guidelines.
9.The proposed Project is conditioned to pay the City’s MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a Condition of Approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP
Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits.
10.The Project is consistent with the reserve assembly requirements of the MSHCP.
The Project Site is located in the Back Basin area and is subject to the 770 Acre
Back Basin Agreement with the Wildlife Agencies related to reserve assembly. Since
the Project has conserved an area along the outlet channel, which contributes to the
extension of existing Core 3 and shall meet the reserve assembly requirements of
the Back Basin Agreement, the Project does not conflict with the reserve assembly
requirements of the MSHCP.
11.The proposed Project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further
actions related to the MSHCP are required.
Section 3. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore, California, adopts findings that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
Passed and Adopted this 13th day of December, 2016.
Brian Tisdale, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
CC Reso No. 2016-___
Page 5 of 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE }SS
I, Susan M. Domen MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that
Resolution No. __ as adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting
held on the 13th day of December 2016, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37253 PROVIDING FOR THE
SUBDIVISION OF 2 LOTS INTO FOUR (4) LOTS AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF
THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY
Whereas, Jeff Pomeroy, on behalf of Civic Partners, has submitted an application for Tentative
Parcel Map providing for the subdivision of two (2) lots into four (4) lots and the reconfiguration of
the adjacent right of way. The Project site is located on 11.27 acres generally located at the
northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The site contains two parcels, identified as
Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-022 and 373-210-041; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Sections 6.2.2 of the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment 1 (SPA) the
Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making
recommendations to the City Council (Council) for Tentative Maps; and,
Whereas, on December 6, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Commission considered
evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.3 (Tentative Maps) of the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment
1 (SPA) the Council of the City of Lake Elsinore (City) has the responsibility of making decisions
to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for parcel maps;
and,
Whereas,on October 25, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Meeting, the Council has considered the
recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Prior to making taking action, the Council has reviewed and analyzed Tentative Parcel
Map No. 37149 pursuant to the appropriate Planning and Zoning Laws, Chapter 16 (Subdivisions)
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and Section 6.2.3.
Section 2. On December 13, 2016, after consideration and evaluation of all written reports and
comments and oral testimony presented by the Community Development Department and other
City departments, property owners, residents and other interested parties and such other matters
as are reflected in the record of the noticed Public Hearing on the Project, the Council adopted
Resolution No. 2016-___ finding and determining that that Addendum #2 to the Diamond Specific
Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Section 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the LEMC, the Council
makes the following findings for approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 37253:
1.The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements,
is consistent with the City General Plan and with the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1. The
CC Reso No. 2016-_______
Page 2 of 3
proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The General Plan designates the site for Specific Plan (SP); the SP in turn designates the site for
Mixed Use. Consistent with that designation, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map can
accommodate future Commercial and Residential Land Uses. The Tentative Parcel Map is
consistent with the Designated Land Use, development and design standards, and all other
appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan, the Diamond Specific Plan and
Amendment #1, and the Subdivision Map Act.
2.The site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development in accordance with the General Plan and the Diamond Specific Plan and
Amendment #1.
The Project site is vacant and is relatively flat. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will subdivide
two (2) lots into four (4) lots and will reconfigure the adjacent right of way will allow for the
development with a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.80, consistent with the limitation of the
Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1.
3.The effects that this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
The Project site has a General Plan land use designation SP, with a Specific Plan Land Use
Designation of Mixed Use and will not have a direct impact on housing. The proposed Tentative
Parcel Map which will subdivide two (2) lots into four (4) lots and will reconfigure the adjacent right
of way will allow for development with a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.80 and will provide
commercial uses to serve the surrounding and adjacent residential communities.
4.The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The Project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and
will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. The proposed use, together with
the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Section 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions
of approval, the recommends that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 37253.
Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of December 2016:
CC Reso No. 2016-_______
Page 3 of 3
Brian Tisdale, Mayor
Attest:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE }SS
I, Susan M. Domen, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2016- ___ as adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular
meeting held on the 13th day of December 2016, and that the same was adopted by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORINA APPROVING OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2016-07
PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGNS FOR 95,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL
SPACE DISTRIBUTED BETWEEN EIGHT BUILDINGS
Whereas, Jeff Pomeroy, on behalf of Civic Partners, has submitted an application for Commercial
Design Review 2016-07, which would approve architectural plans for 95,000 square feet of
commercial space distributed between eight buildings. The project site is located on 11.27 acres
generally located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The site contains
two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-022 and 373-210-041;
and,
Whereas,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000
et seq.: “CEQA”) and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et
seq.: “CEQA Guidelines”), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the
potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.2 (Design Review) of the SPA the City Council (Council) of the
City of Lake Elsinore (City) has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or
disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission (Commission) for Commercial Design
Review applications; and,
Whereas,on December 13, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Meeting, the Council has considered
the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Council has considered the proposed design for Commercial Design Review No.
2016-02 for 95,000 square feet of commercial space distributed between eight buildings. The
Commission has reviewed and analyzed the proposed Project pursuant to the California Planning
and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and finds and determines that the proposed Commercial Design
Review No. 2016-07 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law
and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the LEMC.
Section 2. On December 13, 2016, after consideration and evaluation of all written reports and
comments and oral testimony presented by the Community Development Department and other
City departments, property owners, residents and other interested parties and such other matters
as are reflected in the record of the noticed Public Hearing on the Project, the Council adopted
Resolution No. 2016-___ finding and determining that that Addendum #2 to the Diamond Specific
Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
CEQA.
Section 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the LEMC, the Council
makes the following findings regarding Commercial Design Review No. 2016-07:
CC Reso No. 2016-_____
Page 2 of 3
1.The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the zoning district in which the Project is located.
The proposed facility is located in the Specific Plan General Plan Land Use Designation
and is located within the Ballpark District planning district. The Ballpark planning district
calls for an emphasis on mixed use entertainment, commercial, and residential uses. Goal
1 implementation program asserts the City shall support land use applications consistent
with the Specific Plan. The proposed uses are permitted. Further, the proposed project is
consistent with all development standards identified in the Diamond Specific Plan
Amendment #1. In addition the proposed facility proposes a commercially oriented
development which emphasizes the contemporary theme of the adjacent Lake Elsinore
Storm baseball stadium.
2.The Project complies with the design directives and all other applicable provisions of the
Municipal Code or Specific Plan.
The proposed Project is located Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1 and is located in
the Mixed Use district. The Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1 seeks to create
continuous development theme in the specific Plan area. Furthermore, the design theme
is encouraged to create effective site planning to ensure adequate setbacks, façade
articulations, and other treatments to create a high quality design. The proposed Project
employs a complimentary design with the Lake Elsinore Storm stadium and interjects
adequate diversity so as to not create a monotonous streetscape. The proposed design
also includes various architectural treatments to create an authentic design which
reinforces the design themes identified in the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1.
3.Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.64.070 of the Municipal Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.64.
Pursuant to Section 17.64.070 of the LEMC, the Project been considered by the Planning
Commission at a duly noticed public hearing on December 6, 2016. The proposed Project,
as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies,
will not have a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, appropriate Conditions
of Approval have been included that would mitigate any potential issues associated with
the future development and establishment of use.
Section 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions of
Approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council approves CDR No. 2016-07.
Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
Passed and Adopted this 13th day of December 2016.
Brian Tisdale, Mayor
CC Reso No. 2016-_____
Page 3 of 3
Attest:
________________________
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE }SS
I, Susan M. Domen, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2016- ___ as adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of October, 2016 and that the same was adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2016-22 PROVIDING
BUILDING DESIGNS FOR ONE (1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT
Whereas, Jeff Pomeroy, on behalf of Civic Partners, has submitted an application for Commercial
Design Review 2016-22, which would approve architectural plans for one (1) residential unit. The
project site is located on 11.27 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive
and Malaga Road. The site contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs)
365-280-022 and 373-210-041; and,
Whereas,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000
et seq.: “CEQA”) and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et
seq.: “CEQA Guidelines”), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the
potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and,
Whereas, pursuant to Sections 6.2.3 of the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment 1 (SPA) the
Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to
the City Council (Council) for Design Review Applications; and,
Whereas,on December 6, 2016, at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Planning Commission
(Commission) has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties with respect to this item; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 6.2.2 (Design Review) of the SPA the Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore (City) has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove
recommendations of the Planning Commission for Commercial Design Review applications; and,
Whereas,on December 13, at a duly noticed Public Meeting, the Council has considered the
recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Council has considered the proposed design for Residential Design Review No.
2016-22 for one (1) multi-family dwelling unit. The Council has reviewed and analyzed the
proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000
et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and finds and
determines that the proposed Commercial Design Review No. 2016-07 is consistent with the
requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake
Elsinore General Plan and the LEMC.
Section 2. On December 13, 2016, after consideration and evaluation of all written reports and
comments and oral testimony presented by the Community Development Department and other
City departments, property owners, residents and other interested parties and such other matters
as are reflected in the record of the noticed Public Hearing on the Project, the Council adopted
CC Reso No. 2016-_____
Page 2 of 3
Resolution No. 2016-___ finding and determining that that Addendum #2 to the Diamond Specific
Plan EIR (SCH 2009031084) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
CEQA.
Section 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the LEMC, the Council
makes the following findings regarding Residential Design Review No. 2016-22:
1.The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the zoning district in which the Project is located.
The proposed facility is located in the Specific Plan General Plan Land use designation
and is located within the Ballpark District planning district. The Ballpark planning district
calls for an emphasis on mixed use entertainment, commercial, and residential uses. Goal
1 implementation program asserts the City shall support land use applications consistent
with the Specific Plan. The proposed residential use is permitted. Further, the proposed
project is consistent with all development standards identified in the Diamond Specific
Plan Amendment #1.
2.The Project complies with the design directives and all other applicable provisions of the
Municipal Code or Specific Plan.
The proposed Project is located Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1 and is located in
the Mixed Use district. The Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1 seeks to create
continuous development theme in the specific Plan area. Furthermore, the design theme
is encouraged to create effective site planning to ensure adequate setbacks, façade
articulations, and other treatments to create a high quality design. The proposed project
employs a complimentary design with the Lake Elsinore Storm stadium and interjects
adequate diversity so as to not create a monotonous streetscape. The proposed design
also includes various architectural treatments to create an authentic design which
reinforces the design themes identified in the Diamond Specific Plan Amendment #1.
3.Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.64.070 of the Municipal Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.64.
Pursuant to Section 17.64.070 of the LEMC, the Project been considered by the Planning
Commission at a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 6, 2016. The proposedProject,
as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies,
will not have a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, appropriate Conditions
of Approval have been included that would mitigate any potential issues associated with
the future development and establishment of use.
Section 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions of
Approval imposed upon the Project, the Council approves Residential Design Review No. 2016-
22.
Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
CC Reso No. 2016-_____
Page 3 of 3
Passed and Adopted this 13th day of December 2016.
Brian Tisdale, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE }SS
I, Susan M. Domen, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2016- ___ as adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of December, 2016 and that the same was
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Susan M. Domen, MMC
City Clerk
Page 1 of 25
Applicants Initials: _____
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF
7\@BCL@F4051F03\@BCL@F4051F03.docx
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLUTIONS:
PROJECT NUMBER: PA 2016-38 (TPM 37253, CDR 2016-07, and RDR
2016-22)
PROJECT NAME:Artisan Alley
PROJECT LOCATION:
APPROVAL DATE:December 13, 2016
EXPIRATION DATE:December 13, 2016
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1.Planning Application 2016-38 (TPM 37253, CDR 2016-07, and RDR 2016-22)
consists of the subdivision of two (2) lots into four (4) lots and the reconfiguration
of the adjacent right of way and the development of 95,000 square feet of
commercial space distributed between eight buildings and one (1) residential unit
referred to as the “project”. The project site is located on 11.27 acres generally
located at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The site
contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-
022 and 373-210-041.
2.The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and
hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and Consultants
agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as "Indemnities") from
any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by
Indemnitees concerning approval of the project, or any of the proceedings, acts or
determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the
reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The
Applicant's indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit,
claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys' fees, penalties and other
costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such
proceeding. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the City. If the project is challenged in court, the City and the
applicant shall enter into formal defense and indemnity agreement, consistent with
this condition.
3.Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and return the final
Conditions of Approval to the Community Development Department for inclusion
in the case records.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 2 of 25
4.Permittee shall require that all qualifying contractors and subcontractors exercise
their option to obtain a Board of Equalization sub-permit for the jobsite and allocate
all eligible sales and use tax payments to the City of Lake Elsinore. Prior to
commencement of any construction activity on-site the developer will require that
the contractor or subcontractor provide the City of Lake Elsinore with either a copy
of their Board of Equalization account number and sub-permit, or a statement that
the sales & use tax does not apply to their portion of the project. To accomplish
this, Permittee shall either cause its construction contractor to treat the project in
accordance with California Regulation 1521 (b)(2)(B), California Regulation 1521
(c)(13)(B), and California Regulation 1826(b) for sales and use tax purposes or
form a "Buying Company:" as defined in the State of California Board of
Equalization Regulation 1699(h). Permittee can adopt an alternative methodology
to accomplish this goal if such methodology is approved by the City of Lake
Elsinore City Manager, or designee prior to issuance of building permits.
Permittee shall direct use taxes on out-of-City taxable purchased construction
related items to the City of Lake Elsinore, consistent with state sales and use tax
law. Permitee shall use its best efforts, consistent with state law, to source taxable
purchases from price competition construction retail vendors within the City of Lake
Elsinore to further source sales to the City.
PLANNING DIVISION
5.Tentative Parcel Map No. 37253 will expire two years from date of approval unless
within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an
extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance
with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
6.Tentative Parcel Map No. 37253 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval.
7.Commercial Design Review No. 2016-07 shall lapse and become void two years
following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the
following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the
design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued
toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has
applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval
pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
Section 17.184.120. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review
granted pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two-year
period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a
Applicants Initials: _____Page 3 of 25
change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review
application.
8.Residential Design Review No. 2016-22 shall lapse and become void two years
following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the
following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the
design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued
toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has
applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval
pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
Section 17.184.120. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review
granted pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two-year
period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a
change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review
application.
9.All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior
to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development
Department. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
10.All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building
plans, as modified by these conditions of approval.
11.Any proposed minor revisions to approved plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Community Development Director or designee. Any proposed substantial
revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed according to the provisions of
the Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. Grading plan
revisions shall be reviewed by the City Engineer.
12.All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical
equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded
by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public
streets.
13.A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed
to ensure that all exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so
as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination
above the horizontal plane of the fixture.
14.The property address (in numerals at least six inches high) shall be displayed near
the entrance and be easily visible from the front of the subject property and public
right-of-way.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 4 of 25
15.The applicant shall construct trash enclosure(s) with a decorative roof to match the
colors, materials and design of the project architecture.
16.A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash
receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be
utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be
submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
17.Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping / Irrigation Detail Plans shall be submitted
to the Community Development Department with appropriate fees, reviewed by
the City’s Landscape Architect Consultant and approved by the Community
Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of a building permit.
a)All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with
50% plant coverage using a drip irrigation method.
b)All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6”)
high and six inch (6”) wide concrete curb. Runoff shall be allwed from paved
areas into landscape areas.
c)Planting within fifteen feet (15’) of ingress/egress points shall be no higher
than twenty-four inches (24”).
d)Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade
tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines.
e)No required tree planting bed shall be less than 5 feet wide.
f)Root barriers shall be installed for all trees planted within 10 feet of
hardscape areas to include sidewalks.
g)Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated
on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan.
h)The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and
meet all requirements of the City’s adopted Landscape Guidelines.
i)All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor
for two years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the
landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the
required two years with approval/acceptance reviewed by the Landscape
Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director or
Designee.
j)All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any
phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building.
k)Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan.
l)Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
m)Final landscape plans shall include drought tolerant planting consistent with
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District standards subject to plan check and
approval by the City’s landscape plan check consultant.
n)No turf shall be permitted.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 5 of 25
18.Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Community Development Director. If it is determined
that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community
Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the
landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or
any successors in interest.
19.No individual signs are approved as part of this approval. The applicant or
designee shall submit an application for a sign permit, pay appropriate fees and
receive approval from the Community Development Department for any sign(s)
installed at the project site. OR The applicant shall submit a sign program for
review and approval of the Planning Commission prior to installation.
20.The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer
plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards.
21.Provisions of the City’s Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site
preparation and construction activity. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3’
x 3’ sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours
of construction activity 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Only finish
work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may
commence no earlier than 8:00 a.m. and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. with
no construction activity to occur on Sundays or legal holidays. The sign shall
identify the name and phone number of the development manager to address any
complaints.
22.The proposed location of on-site construction trailers shall be approved by the
Community Development Director or designee. A cash bond of $1,000 shall be
required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during
construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the
site to an acceptable state, subject to approval of the Community Development
Director or designee. Such trailer(s) shall be fully on private property and outside
the public right of way.
23.Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours.
24.The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event
shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours.
25.Install, operate and maintain full capture systems for all storm drains that captures
runoff from the facility or site.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 6 of 25
26.If any of the conditions of approval set forth herein fail to occur, or if they are, by
their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions
fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall
have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further
condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition
all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation.
27.Applicant shall submit to the City’s acting Police Chief a Security Plan prepared to
the Chief’s satisfaction..
28.An unsubordinated restricted covenant providing reciprocal access and parking,
approved by the Community Development Department and in a form satisfactory
to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the Office of the Riverside County
Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the
Community Development Department In addition, provisions shall be made in the
covenant to guarantee that the entire complex shall be managed and maintained
as one (l) integral parcel for purposes of parking, vehicular circulation, signage,
maintenance, land usage and architectural control, and that the covenant shall
be referenced in all deeds transferring all or any part of the interest in the property.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
GENERAL CONDITIONS
29.Final Building and Safety Conditions will be addressed when building construction
plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be
based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes
which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal.
30.All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition
of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes: 2013 California
Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes,
2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
31.The application shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as
stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards.
32.Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and
building setbacks on plans to include:
a)All ground floor units to be adaptable.
b)Disabled access from the public way to the entrance of the building.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 7 of 25
c)Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
d)Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
e)Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as
club house, trach enclosure tot lots and picnic areas.
33.Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting
street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family
residential projects or a recorded final map for single- family residential projects.
34.A receipt or clearance letter from the Lake Elsinore School District shall be
submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or
exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
35.Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to
commencement of any construction work.
36.Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require
separate approvals and permits.
37.On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits.
38.Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation
of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on
the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans
how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter
is not specifically proposed.
AT PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
39.Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and
two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including:
a)An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work.
b)A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of
the Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code.
c)A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for the persons with disabilities.
d)Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the
building and the truss manufacturer engineer.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT(S)
40.Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall
be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 8 of 25
41.A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed
as part of the project.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT(S)
42.Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on the plans.
43.A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start
of the building construction.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL
44.All slopes and landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by the
property owner or property owner’s association or another maintenance entity
approved by the City Council.
45.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control
district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by
property owner or property owner’s association.
46.In accordance with the City’s Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling,
the developer shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and
disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated
during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction.
47.Developer shall mitigate to prevent any flooding and/or erosion downstream
caused by development of the site and or diversion of drainage.
48.Any grading that affects “waters of the United States”, wetlands or jurisdictional
streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from respective Federal
and/or State agencies.
49.The developer shall provide a copy of an encroachment permit or any approval
documents from the Riverside County Flood Control District and/or Caltrans for
encroaching, grading, or discharging into County flood control facilities or Caltrans
right of way.
50.All required soils, geology, hydrology and hydraulic, and seismic reports shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 9 of 25
FEES
51.The developer shall pay all development fees, including but not all inclusive:
TUMF, TIF, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat, Railroad Canyon Benefit District and
Area Drainage Fees.
52.The developer shall pay all Engineering Division assessed, Development Impact
Fees, Plan Check and Permit fees (LEMC 16.34). Applicable Development Impact
Fees include: Railroad Canyon Road Benefit District, Stephens Kangaroo Habitat
Fee (K-Rat), Traffic Infrastructure Fee (TIF), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
(TUMF), and Area Drainage Fee.
53.Mitigation Fees will be assessed at the prevalent rate at time of payment in full.
FLOOD PLAIN
54.A portion of the project lies within a FEMA mapped special flood hazard zone and
within the Floodplain Management area as defined at LEMC 15.68. The project
design shall mitigate the potential impact.
55.Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. Finish
floor elevation of all existing non-permitted (buildings put in place subsequent to
the original CUP) and future buildings shall be a minimum of 1267 ft. Any fill placed
in the 100-year flood plain for the purposes of elevating the building floor out of the
flood plain shall require a CLOMR/CLOMR-F and LOMR/LOMR-F to be processed
with FEMA.
56.Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations to include
elevation of the lowest floor a minimum of 2 feet above the base flood elevation in
FEMA mapped special flood hazard areas (100year).
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION PREVENTION / NPDES
Design:
57.The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES
Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These
Permits include:
General Permit -Construction
Deminimus Discharges
MS4
Applicants Initials: _____Page 10 of 25
58.The project shall complete and submit for review and approval to the
Engineering Division BOTH a preliminary and final WQMP, incorporating the
LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs.
59.The preliminary WQMP shall be approved prior to scheduling for Planning
Commission; the final WQMP shall be approved prior to issuance of any
grading or building permit.
60.The applicant shall use the Water Quality Management Plan for the Santa Ana
Region of Riverside County guidance document and template for WQMP
preparation.
61.WQMP – The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying
Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used onsite to control identified
pollutants of concern. The applicant shall utilize the MS4 Permittee Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP), Model WQMP, and LID Guidance Manual for
reference, and the MS4 Permittee’s WQMP template for submittal. This WQMP
shall include the following:
Detailed site and project description
Potential stormwater pollutants
Post-development drainage characteristics
Low Impact Development (LID) BMP selection and analysis
Structural and Non-Structural source control BMPs
Site design and drainage plan (BMP Exhibit)
Vector issues are addressed in the BMP design, operation and
maintenance.
GIS coordinates for all LID and Treatment Control BMPs
HCOC - demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration
and volume for the post construction condition from a 2 year and 10
year 24 hour rainfall event will not cause significant adverse impacts
on downstream erosion and receiving waters, or measures are
implemented to mitigate significant adverse impacts to downstream
public facilities and water bodies. Design goal to replicate pre-
development hydrologic regime.
62.The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID
Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the
project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority) : (Section
XII.E.2, XII.E.3,and XII.E.7)
The site meets the highest and best use criteria for discharges to
Lake Elsinore.
Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures,
e.g., preservation of natural features to a level consistent with the
Applicants Initials: _____Page 11 of 25
MEP standard; minimization of Urban Runoff through clustering,
reducing impervious areas, etc.)
The Project shall provide for treatment of pollutants of concern the
85th percentile storm event prior to release to the MS4 in accordance
with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G.
63.Parking lot landscaping shall be designed to with concave landscape grading and
provide for treatment, retention or infiltration of runoff.
64.Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage
into adjacent landscape and permeable surfaces in low traffic roads and parking
lots.
65.Trash enclosures shall be bermed and covered.
66.Water Quality Facilities that service more than one parcel shall be placed in an
easement to provide for maintenance and prevent obstruction.
67.Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern – The project shall identify
potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to
limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; conserve natural
areas; protect slopes, channels and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff.
68.CEQA – If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401
Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division.
69.The project shall use either volume-based and/or flow-based criteria for sizing
BMPs in accordance with NPDES Permit Provision XII.D.4.
Construction:
70.A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this project. A
copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for
review upon request.
71.Erosion & Sediment Control -Prior to the issuance of any grading or building
permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan
submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City’s NPDES Program, California
Building Code, and state water quality regulations for grading and construction
activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all
construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil,
Applicants Initials: _____Page 12 of 25
aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be property covered, stored and secured
to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or
dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs
will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways.
Post Construction:
72.Recorded Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan that (1) describes the long-term
operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit;
(2) identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and
maintenance of the referenced BMPs; (3) describes the mechanism for funding the
long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs, and (4) provides
for annual certification of water quality facilities by a registered civil engineer and/or
the City for a fee if the service is available.
73.All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked “Only Rain in the Storm
Drain” using the City authorized marker to prevent illegal dumping in the drain
system.
74.Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall
demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction,
industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include:
Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMP’s)
described in the BMP Exhibit from the project’s approved WQMP
have been implemented, constructed and installed in conformance
with approved plans and specifications.
Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural
BMPs described in the project’s WQMP.
Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that
the structural BMP’s identified in the project’s WQMP are installed
and operational.
Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded Operations and
Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs.
Demonstrate that copies of the project’s approved WQMP (with
recorded O&M Plan attached) are available for each of the initial
occupants (commercial/industrial) or Owner’s Association as
appropriate.
Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore
for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of
Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the
approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from
the engineer of work dated 12 months after C of O will be considered
in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 13 of 25
Provide a recorded copy of one of the following:
1.CC&R’s (they must include the approved WQMP and
O&M Plan) for the project’s Owners Association.
2.A water quality implementation agreement with the
approved WQMP and O&M Plan attached; or
3.The final approved Water Quality Management Plan
and Operations and Maintenance Plan.
75.Chemical management - Prior to the issuance of building permits for any tank or
pipeline, the uses of said tank or pipeline shall be identified and the applicant shall
submit a Chemical Management Plan in addition to a WQMP with all appropriate
measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage,
emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal).
FINAL PARCEL MAP
76.The developer shall submit for plan check review and approval a final map.
77.Phasing plan, if any, shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of
any permits.
78.Prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the developer shall, in accordance
with Government Code, have constructed all improvements or noted on the title
sheet of the map the improvements to be constructed or have improvement plans
submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted.
79.The Final Parcel Map shall include the phasing boundaries consistent with the
parcels of the Tentative Parcel Map. The phasing boundaries or parcels shall be
processed as separate tract maps.
UTILITIES:
80.All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults,
etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his
agent.
81.All overhead utilities shall be undergrounded in accordance with Chapter 12.16 of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
82.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions
of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City’s agreement with the
Applicants Initials: _____Page 14 of 25
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
83.The developer shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division
a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction
activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL).
84.The developer shall submit a copy of the "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for
the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc.
IMPROVEMENTS
Design
85.The development of each Planning Area or Phase shall be subject for specific
review and conditions of approval.
86.Sight distance into and out of the project location shall comply with CALTRANS
Standards.
87.The developer shall install permanent bench marks per City of Lake Elsinore
Standards and at locations to be determined by City Engineer.
88.The developer shall install blue dot markers in the roadway at a right angle to Fire
Hydrant locations per Lake Elsinore Standards.
89.The developer shall coordinate with Riverside Transit Authority for location and
installation of bus transit facilities.
90.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm
runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria
are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided.
91.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood
Control District Standards.
92.A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify
storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed off-
site and onsite drainage facilities; and include a capacity analysis verifying the
adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that
runoff from a 10-yr storm of 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed condition
is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same storm
frequency. Both 6 hour and 24hour storm duration shall be analyzed to determine
the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 15 of 25
93.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall
be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All off-site
drainage, if different from historic flow, shall be conveyed to a public facility.
94.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb.
Roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
95.The site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water from entering
buildings (California Green Building Standards Code 4.106.3).
96.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Lake
Elsinore Public Works Standard Plans.
97.The owner shall dedicate in fee title to the City right-of-way along Diamond Drive
adjacent to the property frontage for a total right-of-way that is equivalent to the
City Council approved alignment of Diamond Drive.
98.The developer shall construct half width street improvements on Diamond Drive
such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to General Plan and Diamond
Specific Plan right-of-way cross sections. The cross section of roadway
improvements with a raised median (if applicable and if applicable, developer shall
pay cash-in-lieu of construction of ½ the raised median), parkway, street lights
shall be consistent with the City Council approved alignment of Diamond Drive.
99.The developer shall implement mitigation measures identified in the Traffic
Analysis, when completed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
100.The developer shall construct a four leg traffic signal at the intersection of Diamond
Drive and Pete Lehr Drive. The traffic signal shall be installed and operational prior
to the issuance of the final occupancy.
101.Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and
the plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, ac pavement, street lighting,
median, trail, and drainage improvements.
102.The developer shall provide signing and striping plans for the required
improvements of this project. The plans shall also incorporate traffic calming
measures.
103.If existing improvements are to be modified, the existing improvement plans on file
shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permit.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 16 of 25
Permitting/Construction
104.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City and/or State
right-of-way. The developer shall submit the permit application, required fees and
executed agreements, security and other required documentation prior to
issuance.
105.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 ½" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division
before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
106.All streets shall be constructed per Lake Elsinore City Standards and/or applicable
specific plan.
Acceptance of Improvements
107.The developer shall submit a written request for acceptance to the City Engineer.
108.As-built plans shall be completed and signed by the City Engineer.
GRADING
Design:
109.A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted for City review and approval for all addition and/or movement of soil
(grading) on the site. The plan shall include separate sheets for erosion control,
haul route and traffic control. The grading submittal shall include all supporting
documentation and be prepared using City standard title block, standard drawings
and design manual (available at www.lake-elsinore.org).
110.All grading plan contours shall extend to minimum of 50 feet beyond property lines
to indicate existing drainage pattern.
111.The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are
located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance.
112.If the grading plan identifies alterations in the existing drainage patterns as they
exit the site, a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for review and approval by City
Engineer shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits. All grading that
modifies the existing flow patterns and/or topography shall be approved by the City
Applicants Initials: _____Page 17 of 25
Engineer.
113.A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake
faults, liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from
a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the
absence of this hazard.
114.The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-
site grading and the applicant shall accept drainage from the adjacent property
owners.
Permit/Construction:
115.Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post
grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance.
116.A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering
Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity.
117.Developer shall provide the city with a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) letter issued by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program
118.Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City
with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material.
All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in
excess of 5,000 cy shall be approved by City Council. (LEMC 15.72.065)
119.Export sites located within the Lake Elsinore City limits must have an active
grading permit.
120.Applicant to provide to the City a video record of the condition of all proposed public
City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost
of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to
ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of
the City Engineer.
121.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. Slopes
steeper than 2 to 1 shall be evaluated for stability and proper erosion control and
approved by the City.
122.Review of the project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and
Applicants Initials: _____Page 18 of 25
sediment and erosion control plan shall be completed. A copy of the current
SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request.
123.Approval of the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post
construction shall be received prior to issuance of a grading permit.
124.Submit an approved environmental clearance document to the Engineering
Division. This approval shall identify and clear all proposed grading activity
anticipated for this project.
125.Developer shall pay all grading permit applicable processing, permit, security and
development fees including those fees identified in an applicable development
agreement, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
126.Provide final soils, geology and seismic report, including recommendations for
parameters for seismic design of buildings, and walls prior to building permit.
127.Approval of a letter of map revision (LOMR) or letter of map revision based on fill
(LOMR-F) must be received from FEMA.
128.A Traffic Analysis shall be submitted and approved.
129.All required public right-of-way dedications and easements shall be prepared by
the developer or his agent and shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for
review and approval prior to issuance of building permit.
130.The Final Parcel or Final Tract Map shall be recorded.
131.All street improvement plans, traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans shall
be completed and approved by the City Engineer.
132.The developer shall pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees
and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34).
Prior to Occupancy
133.The traffic signals referenced in Condition of Approval No. ________ shall be
installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
134.All signing and striping and traffic control devices onsite and on Mission Trail and
Diamond Drive shall be installed.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 19 of 25
135.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans
or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
136.The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development shall
be paid.
137.In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related
activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline
condition.
138.Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces,
landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided in a recordable format
and recorded prior to occupancy/final.
139.As-built plans for all approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City. The developer/developer/owner is responsible for revising the original
mylar plans.
140.All final studies and reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 ½ x 11” mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD.
Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading,
SWPPP, WQMP, etc.
141.Final soil report showing compliance with recommendations, compaction reports,
grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ½ x
11” mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on CD to the Engineering Division before
final inspection will be scheduled.
142.All plan sets and recorded maps shall be digitized and provided on CD/DVD as
follows:
Final Map(s) - GIS Shape files* and .tif of recorded map.
Improvement Plans – GIS Shape files*, AutoCad file, and .tif of
approved as built mylar.
Grading Plans – AutoCad file and .tif of approved as built mylar.
*GIS Shape files must be in projected Coordinate System:
NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet.
143.Developer shall provide FEMA elevation certificates for all buildings (includes
trailers and storage facilities) prior to final approvals. If a LOMR-F has been
processed and approved by FEMA, the letter of determination and certification may
be in the form of a letter signed and sealed by a licensed civil engineer.
144.All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, dedications and vacations
and easement agreement(s) not processed on the final map for ingress and egress
Applicants Initials: _____Page 20 of 25
through adjacent property(ies)shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to
the City prior to building permit issuance.
145.The developer shall pay fee in-lieu of construction of future median improvements
on Diamond Drive and Mission Trail. The fee shall be equal to current cost
estimate for improvements (including contingency) plus an additional 15% of the
total construction cost estimate to cover design and administrative costs. The cost
estimate shall be approved by City staff.
146.Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water
District Requirements.
147.Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of
use or a certificate of occupancy, developer shall:
Demonstrate that all structural BMPs have been constructed,
installed and are functioning in conformance with approved plans
and specifications and the WQMP;
Demonstrate that they are prepared to implement all non-structural
BMPs included in the conditions of approval or building/grading
permit conditions;
Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved
project specific WQMP are available for the future
owners/occupants; and
The developer shall provide all education guidelines for Water
Quality Management Practices to the tenants, operators and owners
of the businesses of the development, regarding the environmental
awareness on good housekeeping practices that contribute to
protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the approved
WQMP in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management
Plan. Contact the City NPDES Coordinator for handout/guideline
information.
148.The property owner (aka Legally Responsible Party) shall execute and cause to
be recorded a “Covenant and Agreement” in the form provided by the City to
inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved final
project-specific WQMP.
149.Developer shall pay all outstanding applicable processing and development fees
including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF, Stephens Kangaroo Rat
Habitat and area drainage prior to occupancy/final approval. The TUMF fees shall
be the effective rate at the time of payment in full in accordance with the LEMC.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIRE MARSHAL
Applicants Initials: _____Page 21 of 25
GENERAL CONDITIONS
150.Riverside County Fire Department Lake Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal -
It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to
forward them to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above)
is required on all correspondence.
Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake
Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530.
Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. The following fire department conditions shall be
implemented in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the
adopted codes at the time of project building plan submittal, these conditions are
in addition to the adopted code requirements.
151.Blue Dot Reflectors-Blue retro-reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on
private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants.
Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside
County Fire Dept.
152.Minimum Hydrant Fire Flow-Minimum required fire flow shall be 2,000 GPM for
2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available
before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Average spacing
between hydrants 400’ and 225’ maximum distance from any point on the street or
road frontage to hydrant.
153.Minimum Access Standards-The following access requirements are required to
be implemented to ensure fire department and emergency vehicular access. All
roadways shall conform to the City of Lake Elsinore approved roadway standards
but in no case shall the minimum fire department vehicular access be less the
following provisions:
Twenty-four feet (24’) clear width. Where parking is to be provided,
each parking side shall be provided with eight (8’) additional feet on
each side of the fire department access. Buildings exceeding 30’ in
height shall be provided 30’ access roads adjacent to the protected
building.
Access roads that contain a center median between opposing lanes
of a divided access road shall be not less than 20’ in width each
direction.
The required all weather vehicular access shall be able to support no
less than 75,000 lbs. over 2 axles.
Roadway gradient shall not exceed 15% on any access road,
driveways, and perimeter roads.
Turning Radius shall be 24’ inside and 48’ outside for all access
roads.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 22 of 25
154.Secondary Access-In the interest of Public Safety, this project shall provide an
Alternate or Secondary Access. Said access shall be constructed in accordance
to the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department standards to accommodate
full fire response and community evacuation.
155.Automatic / Manual Gates-Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than
the width of the traffic lane (s) serving that gate and no less than 24 feet wide. Any
gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet
from the roadway and shall open to allow vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic
on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a
gate entrance, a 40 foot turning radius shall be used. Gate access shall be
equipped with a rapid entry system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic/manual gate pins shall be
rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30 foot pounds. Automatic gates shall be
equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry
system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Contact the Fire
Planning office for current plan check fees.
156.Separation of Occupancy-A fire barrier wall for the separation of occupancies is
required per the California Building Code. Fire walls, fire barriers, fire partitions,
smoke barriers, and smoke partitions or any other wall required to have protected
openings or penetrations shall be effectively and permanently identified with signs
or stenciling. Such identification shall be located in accessible concealed floor,
floor ceiling or attic spaces repeated at intervals not exceeding 30 feet along the
wall, and include lettering not less than .5 inch in height, incorporating the
suggested wording “FIRE AND/OR SMOKE BARRIER—PROTECT ALL
OPENINGS,” or other wording.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
157.Plan Check Fee-Building plan check fees shall be made payable to the “City of
Lake Elsinore”, and shall be submitted to the Fire Department at the time of plan
submittal.
158.Water System Plans-Applicant and/or developer shall submit 2 sets of water
system plans to the Fire Department for review. The plans must be signed by a
registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Department review
and approval. Mylars will be signed by the Fire Department after review and
approval. Two (2) copies of the signed and approved water plans shall be returned
to the Fire Department before release of a building permit.
159.Prior to Building Construction Verification-This project shall be inspected and
approved by the Fire Marshal or designee prior to bringing combustible materials
Applicants Initials: _____Page 23 of 25
on site. During said inspection all permanent road signs shall be in place, all
hydrants shall on operating and approved for use by the water purveyor, and all
permanent road surfaces shall be completed including primary and secondary
access circulation.
PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION
160.Fire Sprinkler System 13-Install a complete fire sprinkler system designed in
accordance with California Building Code, California Fire Code and adopted
standards. Sprinkler systems with pipe sizes larger than 4 inches in diameter will
require the Engineer or Architect of Record certification with details and
calculations with “wet signature” that the building structural system is designed to
support the seismic and gravity loads for the support of the additional weight of the
sprinkler system. The PIV and FDC shall be located to the front of the building in
an approved location, unobstructed and within 50 feet of an approved road or
driveway, within 200 feet of a hydrant. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit
plans, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval
prior to installation.
161.Sprinkler System Monitoring-Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler
system(s) with 20 or more heads. Valve monitoring, water-flow alarm and trouble
signals shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote
station or proprietary monitoring station in accordance with California Building
Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. An approved audible sprinkler
flow alarm shall be provided on the exterior in an approved location. The location
of the Fire Alarm Control Unit shall be located in an environmentally controlled
location in accordance with 10.14 (NFPA 72).A C-10 licensed contractor must
submit plans designed in accordance with adopted standards, along with the
current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation.
162.Designated Fire Lanes-The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with
appropriate lane painting and/ or signs.
163.Knox Rapid Entry Box-A rapid entry Knox Box shall be installed on the outside
of the building. Key(s) shall have durable and legible tags affixed for identification
of the correlating tenant space. Special forms are available from this office for
ordering the Knox Box. If the building/facility is protected with a fire alarm or burglar
alarm system, it is recommended that the lock box be “tamper” monitoring.
164.Fire Extinguishers –Minimum Install portable fire extinguishers complying with
Section 906 of the 2013 California Fire Code with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC
and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public areas shall be in recessed
cabinets mounted 48” (inches) to center above floor level with maximum 4”
Applicants Initials: _____Page 24 of 25
projection from the wall.Contact Fire Dept. for proper placement of equipment prior
to installation.
165.Hood/Duct Suppression System-A UL 300 hood/duct fire extinguishing system
must be installed over the cooking Equipment as required by the California Fire
Code, California Mechanical Code and adopted standards. The extinguishing
system must automatically shut-down gas and /or electricity to all cooking
appliances upon activation. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along
with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to
installation. Alarm system supervision is only required if the building has an
existing fire alarm system.
If any of the conditions are unclear, difficult to understand, or you would like to setup a
meeting please feel free to contact me at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 225 so that I can better assist
you in the approval of this project.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
166.Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall consent to the
formation of Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community
Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going
operation and maintenance of the public right of way landscaped areas and
neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public
right of way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to
Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm
drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to
offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall, make a ten
thousand dollar ($10,000) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation
or annexation process, as applicable. The applicant may propose alternative
financing mechanisms to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the
public right of way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by
the City and for street lights in the public right of way for which the City will pay for
electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including
parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development
and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of
the project in lieu of creating/annexing into a district.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
167.The applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures, which are set
forth in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Diamond
Specific Plan EIR (SCH# 2009031084) and the second addendum, which was
adopted for this project.
Applicants Initials: _____Page 25 of 25
I hereby state that I acknowledge receipt of the approved Conditions of Approval for the
above named project and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all Conditions of
Approval as approved by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council on December 13, 2016. I
also acknowledge that all Conditions shall be met as indicated.
Date:
Applicant’s Signature:
Print Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
f
ARTISAN ALLEY
ADDENDUM
SCH No. 2009031084
Lead Agency:
City of Lake Elsinore
Justin Kirk, Principal Planner
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
Project Sponsor:
Civic Partners –Elsinore, LLC
7777 Center Avenue, Suite 230
Huntington Beach CA 92647
November 8, 2016 DRAFT
2
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................4
1.1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................4
1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................4
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES.................................................................................................................5
1.4 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................7
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...........................................................................................................8
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION .....................................................................................................................................8
2.2 EXISTING LAND USES ....................................................................................................................................8
2.3 SURROUNDING LAND USES ........................................................................................................................8
3 MODIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................13
3.1 PROPOSED LAND USE &SITE LAYOUT ...................................................................................................13
3.2 PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION .............................................................................................................16
3.3 PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES .....................................................................................................................18
Aesthetics .............................................................................................................................................18
Air Quality ...........................................................................................................................................18
Biological Resources ...........................................................................................................................19
Geology and Soils ..............................................................................................................................20
Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................................................20
Hydrology and Water Quality.........................................................................................................21
Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................................................22
Noise.....................................................................................................................................................23
Public Services.....................................................................................................................................23
Recreation ............................................................................................................................................24
Transportation and Traffic ................................................................................................................24
Utilities and Service Systems .............................................................................................................25
3.4 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING .................................................................................................................26
3.5 DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD-OUT....................................................................................................26
3.6 VARIANCE ................................................................................................ERROR!BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
3.7 DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUESTED ...................................................................................................26
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST......................................................................................................28
4.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................28
4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ........................................................................28
4.3 DETERMINATION:........................................................................................................................................29
4.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ......................................................................................31
Terminology Used in the Checklist....................................................................................................31
5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................33
5.1 AESTHETICS...................................................................................................................................................33
5.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ..............................................................................................37
5.3 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................................39
5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .........................................................................................................................45
5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................................51
5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS...............................................................................................................................55
5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS...............................................................................................................60
5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..............................................................................................63
5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY......................................................................................................68
5.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING .......................................................................................................................76
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
3
5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES.................................................................................................................................79
5.12 NOISE.............................................................................................................................................................81
5.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING..................................................................................................................86
5.14 PUBLIC SERVICES.........................................................................................................................................88
5.15 RECREATION.................................................................................................................................................92
5.16 TRANSPORTATIONAND TRAFFIC............................................................................................................94
5.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...........................................................................................................101
5.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.......................................................................................107
List of Figures
Figure 2-1. Regional Map.............................................................................................................................. 9
Figure 2-2. Local Vicinity Map....................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 2-3. Site Photographs.......................................................................................................................10
Figure 2-4. Surrounding Land Uses.............................................................................................................11
Figure 2-5. General Plan Land Use Designations....................................................................................12
Figure 3-1. Site Plan......................................................................................................................................14
Figure 3-2. Conceptual Landscape Plan....................................................................................................17
List of Tables
Table 3-1. Project Development Summary................................................................................................13
Table 3-2. Project Phasing............................................................................................................................16
Table 5.16-1. Trip Generation – Approved Project vs. Modified Project and Sports Complex....95
Table 5.17-1. Solid Waste Generation – Modified Project and Sports Complex.........................104
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
4
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
This document states the basis for the City of Lake Elsinore’s determination that the Artisan Alley
commercial project proposed by Civic Partners – Elsinore, LLC falls within the scope of the
previously-certified The Diamond Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2009031084)
(“DSP EIR”) and that no supplemental or subsequent EIR may be required pursuant to Section 21166
of the Public Resources Code. While the project differs in some minor respects from the project
description in the DSP EIR, those changes will not result in any new or substantially more severe
impacts than those that have already been analyzed. Further, no new or substantially more severe
impacts will result from any changes in circumstances surrounding the proposed project (“modified
project,” as further described herein), and there is no new information of substantial importance
that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at
the time the DSP EIR was certified that would affect the analysis of the potential significant effects,
mitigation measures or alternatives of the project analyzed in the DSP EIR. Therefore, as explained
in greater detail below, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required
because all potential effects of the modified project have been analyzed in the DSP EIR and this
Addendum.
1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Civic Partners – Elsinore, LLC seeks City approval for a Commercial Design Review to construct the
“modified project,” consisting of a 95,000-square-foot commercial center, 130-room hotel, and 1
live-work dwelling unit on 11.27 acres in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. The
modified project is located within Planning Area (PA) 5 – Malaga North of the Diamond Specific
Plan (DSP), which was analyzed for development as Phase 3B in the DSP EIR. This property (“project
site”) is currently vacant.
The DSP incorporated mitigation measures to reduce impacts from future development throughout
the Specific Plan area. The analysis in the DSP EIR identified environmental effects of development
of the entire Specific Plan area, including development of the project site with commercial uses. The
modified project is consistent with the scope and type of development analyzed on the project site
in the DSP EIR. The DSP EIR analyzed development of the DSP, which consists of 86.4 acres (“Specific
Plan area”) including the project site, with a total of 600 dwelling units, 897,000 square feet (SF)
of commercial development, 150 hotel rooms, and 10 acres of commercial uses. Within the 11.27-
acre project site, the DSP EIR analyzed 100 dwelling units and 110,000 SF of commercial uses.
A separate project, the Lake Elsinore Diamond Stadium Sports Complex (Sports Complex), is being
processed concurrently with the modified project. The Sports Complex consists of up to 520,000
square feet of built space consisting of up to 58 volleyball courts and ancillary support uses. This
facility is located within PA 2 – Community Core of the DSP, which was analyzed for development
as Phase 1 and a portion of Phase 2B in the DSP EIR.
On July 13, 2010, the Lake Elsinore City Council adopted The Diamond Specific Plan certified the
DSP EIR. Future buildout of the DSP area will occur subject to mitigation measures identified in the
DSP EIR and the development regulations in the zoning code. No lawsuit was filed challenging the
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
5
City’s approval of the project or the environmental analysis. Therefore, pursuant to section 21167.2
of the Public Resources Code, the DSP EIR must be conclusively presumed to be valid with regard
to its use for later activities unless any of the circumstances requiring supplemental review exist.
(Pub. Resources Code, § 21167.2; Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of the University of
California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1130 (“[a]fter certification, the interests of finality are favored”);
Santa Teresa Citizen Action Group v. City of San Jose (2003) 114 Cal. App. 4th 689, 705-706.)
The City Council approved DSP Amendment No. 1 and General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2014-
03 on May 26, 2015. DSP Amendment No. 1 amended the DSP’s circulation plan to replace
Diamond Circle with the existing Pete Lehr Drive and its extension to Malaga Road, redesignated
Diamond Stadium as “Stadium Use,” and remove the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit for
various uses. GPA No. 2014-03 amended the City’s Circulation Element to reflect the roadway plan
change in DSP Amendment No. 1. DSP Amendment No. 1 and GPA No. 2014-03 were found to be
consistent with the projects analyzed in the DSP EIR and the Recirculated Program EIR for the
General Plan update (December 2011), and no further environmental analysis was required.
This environmental checklist provides the basis for an Addendum to the previously certified DSP EIR
and serves as the environmental review of the proposed modified project, as required pursuant to
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq., the State CEQA Guidelines. This Addendum augments the analysis in the EIR
as provided in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 and provides the basis for the City’s determination
that no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required to evaluate the project. Environmental analysis
and mitigation measures from the DSP EIR have been incorporated into this Addendum and modified
as necessary to address the site specific conditions of the project. In cases where mitigation measures
from the DSP EIR have been satisfied by studies prepared for this Addendum, it is so noted.
Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Lake Elsinore is the
Lead Agency, charged with the responsibility of deciding whether or not to approve the proposed
project. As part of the decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider the
potential environmental effects that could result from construction and operation of the modified
project. The analysis in this document discusses the adequacy of the EIR related to the approval of
the modified project.
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES
Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City’s review of the proposed environmental
checklist and Addendum will determine if approval of the discretionary actions requested and
subsequent development could have a significant impact on the environment or cause a change in
the conclusions of the DSP EIR, and disclose any change in circumstances or new information of
substantial importance that would substantially change the conclusions of the DSP EIR. This
environmental checklist and Addendum will provide the City of Lake Elsinore with information to
document potential impacts of the proposed project.
Pursuant to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, when an
EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared for the project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence,
that one or more of the following conditions are met:
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
6
1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects; or
3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified
as complete, shows any of the following:
a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration.
b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified
in the previous EIR.
c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project,
but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.
d) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or
alternatives.
Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared
“if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162
calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.”
This Addendum reviews the changes proposed by the modified project and any changes to the
existing conditions that have occurred since the DSP EIR was certified. It also reviews any new
information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with
exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the DSP EIR was certified. It further examines
whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a subsequent EIR may be required.
This examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section
15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed project. This
Addendum relies on use of the attached Environmental Analysis, which addresses environmental
checklist issues on a section-by-section basis.
An Environmental Checklist is included in Sections 4 and 5. The Environmental Checklist is marked
with the findings of the Community Development Director as to the environmental effects of the
proposed project in comparison with the findings of the DSP EIR certified in 2015. The Checklist has
been prepared pursuant to Section 15168(c)(4) which states that “[w]here the subsequent activities
involve site specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to
document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects
of the operation were covered in the DSP EIR.”
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
7
On the basis of the findings of the DSP EIR and the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, the
City of Lake Elsinore, as the Lead Agency, determined that, as documented in this Addendum to the
previously approved DSP EIR, no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required to review the modified
project application.
1.4 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
As explained above, on July 13, 2010, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore certified the
DSP EIR and adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for those significant
and unavoidable environmental effects associated with implementation of the DSP project. The
City’s certification of the DSP EIR included adoption of findings for two areas of environmental
impact that could not be avoided and were considered to be significant and adverse: air quality
and greenhouse gas emissions. The Findings certifying the DSP EIR also identified four environmental
impact areas for which mitigation would reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than
significant level (biological resources, cultural resources, noise, and transportation and traffic). The
modified project will implement applicable mitigation measures included in the DSP EIR.
This Addendum incorporates by reference the DSP EIR and the technical documents that relate to
the proposed modified project or provide additional information concerning the environmental
setting of the proposed project. The information disclosed in this Addendum is based on the
following technical studies and/or planning documents:
City of Lake Elsinore General Plan (2011)
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
DSP EIR and certifying resolutions and findings
Technical studies, personal communications, and web sites listed in Section 6, References
The documents are available for review at the Community Development Department, located at
130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, Calif. 92530.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
8
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located in the City of Lake Elsinore. The City is located in the southwestern portion
of Riverside County. Figure 2-1, Regional Map, shows the project in its regional context. The project
site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Lake Elsinore. It is bounded on the west by
Diamond Drive, on the south by Malaga Road, on the east by a shopping center located on Mission
Trail, and on the north by a vacant parcel at the southeast corner of Campbell Street and Diamond
Drive. Figure 2-2, Local Vicinity Map, shows the modified project in its local context.
2.2 EXISTING LAND USES
The project site consists of 11.27 acres at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road.
The site contains two parcels, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 365-280-022 and
373-210-041. The site is vacant and has had no known historical land uses. See Figures 2-3, Site
Photographs
2.3 SURROUNDING LAND USES
Surrounding land uses include Lake Elsinore Town Center, a shopping center, to the east; single-
family residential development within the Summerly community to the south; Diamond Stadium, a
6,000-seat minor league baseball stadium, to the west; and vacant parcels to the north. See Figure
2-4, Surrounding Land Uses
Lands to the west and immediately to the north are within the DSP, which consists of a single land
use district, Mixed-Use. Further to the north, beyond Campbell Street, vacant parcels are
designated for Commercial Mixed Use development. To the south, residential areas within the East
Lake Specific Plan are designated Residential 1. To the east, the shopping center is within a
Commercial Mixed Use land use district. See Figure 2-5, General Plan Land Use Designations
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
9
Figure 2-1. Regional Map
Figure 2-2. Local Vicinity Map
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
10
Figure 2-3. Site Photographs
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
11
Figure 2-4. Surrounding Land Uses
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
12
Figure 2-5. General Plan Land Use Designations
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
13
3 MODIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 PROPOSED LAND USE & SITE LAYOUT
The modified project includes construction of 95,000 SF of commercial space, 1 live-work dwelling
unit, and a 130-room hotel. The hotel is not being processed as part of the current Design Review
application; however, it is included in this analysis because an application is expected in the near
future. The commercial space would include a combination of retail, restaurant, and brewery uses.
As shown in Figure 3-1, Site Plan, the project proposes nine buildings. Seven of the buildings would
be single-story. One structure would contain a second story housing a single dwelling unit. The
concept plan for the hotel assumes four stories.
Table 3-1, Project Development Summary, provides a breakdown of the proposed uses. The site
plan shows the conceptual arrangement of buildings and parking areas, the size and location of
the pedestrian spaces and landscaping, and how the features relate to one another. A cluster of
five buildings (Buildings 1-5), including 46,400 SF of commercial space, would be clustered around
a public plaza at the southwest corner of the site. To the east, across a parking area, would be one
building (Building 6) with a row of commercial uses totaling 38,600 SF, including a major retailer
with a 20,000 SF store. The northerly portion of the site would contain the hotel (Building 7) and
two pads for commercial uses, covering 4,000 SF and 6,000 SF (Buildings 8 and 9, respectively).
The project includes the flexibility to determine individual building sizes based on market conditions,
provided the total square footage and vehicle trips generated by the project do not exceed the
assumption analyzed in this Addendum.
Table 3-1. Project Development Summary
Buildings Proposed Use Size
Building 1 Shops 11,200 SF
Brewery 4,000 SF
Live-Work Residential 1 unit
Building 2 Brewery 7,500 SF
Building 3 Brewery 6,000 SF
Building 4 Restaurant 7,000 SF
Brewery 4,000 SF
Building 5 Pad 6,700 SF
Building 6 Brewery 3,000 SF
Shops 15,600 SF
Major 20,000 SF
Building 7 Hotel 130 rooms
Building 8 Pad 4,000 SF
Building 9 Pad 6,000 SF
Total Commercial Floor Area 95,000 SF
Total Hotel Rooms 130 rooms
Total Residential 1 unit
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
14
Figure 3-1. Site Plan
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
15
Comparison with Prior Approval
The previously adopted land use plan for PA 5 included 100 multifamily units, 90,000 square feet
of general office use, and 20,000 square feet of shopping center use. The project is proposing to
develop a 130-room hotel, 95,000 square feet of shopping center use, and 1 live-work unit within
PA 5. The Diamond Specific Plan permits the transfer of development between planning areas and
allows intensification of use of up to 25 percent. While not analyzed in this addendum, it is noted
that the 130 hotel rooms proposed to be constructed as part of this project are a relocation of a
150-room hotel that was previously proposed in PA 3. Due to operational and environmental
constraints related to the location of PA 3 relative to Lake Elsinore, it is highly unlikely any future
hotel development would occur at that location.
Parking and Access
The project site is accessible via I-I5 from the Diamond Drive offramp, as well as from the regional
arterial Mission Trail, via Malaga Road. Five driveways would provide access to the site, including
two from Diamond Drive and three from Malaga Road. A total of 572 parking spaces are
distributed across the center of the site.
Pedestrian access would be from sidewalks along Diamond Drive and Malaga Road, which connect
to a system of on-site walkways and plazas. The main cluster of buildings (Buildings 1-5) at the
southwest corner of the site is directly accessible from sidewalks on both Diamond Drive and Malaga
Road; Building 6 is connected to the main cluster via an on-site walkway. The hotel and pads located
north of the main cluster (Buildings 7-9) are also accessible via walkway and sidewalk.
The modified project would include bicycle parking areas in compliance with the California Green
Building Standards Code. Bicyclists would have access to Class II bike lanes along both Diamond
Drive and Malaga Road, which connect to a broader system of bicycle routes across Lake Elsinore.
Public transportation to the site would be provided by Riverside Transit Agency bus service (Route
8), with bus stops on Mission Trail.
Lighting
The modified project includes pole-mounted LED parking lot lights, security lighting, sign lighting,
and halo façade lighting. Other types of lighting may be incorporated subject to DSP and Municipal
Code standards.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
16
Fencing and Walls
A 6-foot-tall masonry wall is proposed along the site’s eastern boundary, replacing an existing
chainlink fence separating the site from the Lake Elsinore Town Center shopping center.
Landscaping & Stormwater Management
The project, excluding the hotel site, would include a minimum of 49,000 SF of landscaping and
37,000 SF of pedestrian plaza space. Figure 3-4, Conceptual Landscape Plan, provides a detailed
view of the overall project site and proposed landscaping and vegetation. Various tree species are
proposed along public streets, within parking areas, as specimens in entry and plaza areas, as
accent trees, and as screen trees. Various shrub species are proposed as groundcovers. The hotel
site would include similar types and density of plantings.
Stormwater would be managed onsite via a combination of aboveground and underground
facilities. Bioretention basins would receive a portion of the site’s drainage. The bioretention facility
is a shallow vegetated basin underlain by engineering soil media. The remainder of the site’s
drainage would flow to an underground infiltration system with Continuous Deflection System (CDS)
pretreatment, which screens and traps debris, sediment, oil and grease from stormwater prior to
the infiltration system. The underground infiltration system is series of chambers which allow
infiltration into the surrounding soil. Connections to existing storm drain lines below Diamond Drive
and Malaga Road would be provided.
Utilities
Water, wastewater, telephone, cable television, and natural gas service connections exist along the
site frontage. The modified project would obtain service connections from new laterals connecting
to Diamond Drive and Malaga Road.
3.2 PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION
The total construction period is expected to be approximately 18 months. The phasing of project
construction is projected to be as follows:
Table 3-2. Project Phasing
Activity No. of Months
Site Preparation 0.5 month
Grading 0.5 month
Building Construction 15 months
Paving 1 month
Architectural Coatings 1 month
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
17
Figure 3-2. Conceptual Landscape Plan
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
18
3.3 PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES
The following project design features (PDFs) are incorporated into and analyzed as part of the
modified project and will help to reduce and avoid potential impacts:
Aesthetics
PDF-AES-1.The project will conform to the design guidelines presented in the Diamond Specific
Plan.
PDF-AES-2. Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking
rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at time of installation.
PDF-AES-3.[Light or glare]All lighting is required to comply with the City of Lake Elsinore lighting
ordinance including the siting and direction of light fixtures. Lighting fixtures should be shielded to
minimize unwanted spillover and glare. All outdoor lighting fixtures in excess of 60 watts would be
oriented and shielded to reduce glare or direct and reduce illumination onto adjacent properties
or streets.Low pressure sodium lighting in accordance with the Mount Palomar Observatory lighting
standards shall be required. Building finishes will be non-reflective.
Air Quality
PDF-AQ-1.As a condition of project approval, the project must adhere to SCAQMD Rules 403
(Fugitive Dust Control), 431.2 (Low Sulfur Fuel), 1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers) and 1113
(Architectural Coatings) during construction-related activities. Rule 1113 limits the VOC content of
architectural coatings by providing numeric standards for VOC concentrations per volume of
coating.SCAQMD Rule 403 includes a menu of fugitive dust control measures to which the project
must adhere, including, but not limited to:
Dust Control
Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas.
Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil
disturbance on unpaved surfaces when winds exceed 25 mph.
Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed.
Active construction areas shall be watered at least three times per day.
All haul trucks shall be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
All unpaved parking or staging areas shall be watered four times daily.
Site access points shall be swept or washed within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition
on any public roadway.
All stock piles on-site of debris, dirt, or other dusty material shall be covered or watered
three times daily.
Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible.
Any cleared area that is to remain inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing shall be
stabilized.
Reduce speeds on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
19
Exhaust Emissions
Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off-road equipment.
Limit allowable idling to five minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available.
Utilize diesel particulate filter on heavy equipment where feasible.
Painting and Coatings
Use low VOC coatings and high pressure-low volume sprayers.
Biological Resources
PDF-BIO-1.[Indirect impacts]The project will implement the following measures to reduce indirect
impacts:
Include landscape controls by installing native landscaping that require minimal water
application;
Select, design, and utilize best management practices (BMPs) including treatment control
BMPs (i.e., constructed wetlands, filter inserts, bio-swales, and catch basins), and site design
BMPs (i.e., landscaping).
Any lighting adjacent to the open space areas near the project should be shielded or
directed away from conserved areas.
A number of non-structural best management practices (BMPs) will minimize the amount of
trash/debris created by the Diamond Specific Plan, including activity restrictions placed on
the tenants, the distribution of educational materials to the tenants, the placement of trash
receptacles in common areas, street sweeping, and the placement and maintenance of inlet
trash racks.
PDF-BIO-2.[Exotic plant and animal infestations]To the maximum extent practicable, native
plants should be used in the landscape plans for the common areas of the project.Native plant
species shall be used in the water quality basins and other restoration and enhancement areas. The
plant palette should be consistent with the MSHCP and should be careful to avoid the species listed
in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP.
PDF-BIO-3.[Exotic plant and animal infestations] Construction shall abide by an integrated pest
management plan which shall include the following weed control measures:preventative practices
to avoid the transport and spread of weeds and weed seed during project development and
operation,use of only certified weed-free hay, straw and other organic mulches to control erosion,
and a plan to control noxious weeds and weeds of local concern within designated open space
areas.
PDF-BIO-4.[Exotic plant and animal infestations] The project shall comply with the MSHCP by
incorporating barriers for proposed land uses adjacent to Preservation Areas to minimize
unauthorized public access, introduction of urban wildlife, and/or illegal dumping within the
Preservation Areas.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
20
Geology and Soils
PDF-GEO-1.All earthwork and grading at the project site shall be performed in accordance with
all applicable building code requirements,the California Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (Cal/OSHA), and the Grading Code of the City of Lake Elsinore (Section 17.10.070
of the Zoning Code), and the recommendations outlined in the Preliminary Geologic and
Geotechnical Investigation. Slopes shall not be steeper than 2:1 unless approved by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments and considered safe in a slope stability report
prepared by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist.
PDF-GEO-2.[Ground shaking]The project shall implement recommendations outlined in the
Geotechnical Evaluation for the proposed project in accordance with the 2006 IBC and 2008 CBC
requirements for resistance to seismic shaking.
PDF-GEO-3.[Erosion]During construction, soil erosion shall be controlled and reduced to a less
than significant impact through the implementation of a project-specific Erosion Control Plan and a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the California State Water
Resources Control Board Order No. 92-08-DWQ, NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002. The
SWPPP shall comply with Best Available Technology (BAT) and Best Conventional Pollutant Control
Technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate soil erosion from areas of construction activity. For erosion
control purposes, slopes exceeding five feet in vertical height shall be hydromulched prior to final
acceptance and prior to the beginning for the rainy season (October-March).
PDF-GEO-4.[Grading]
All construction shall comply with the provisions of applicable building codes and other codes
or City ordinances related thereto.
All grading shall be in accordance with the standards of Chapter 15.72 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code and with Chapter 4 of the Specific Plan.
Prior to commencing any grading, including clearing and grubbing, a grading permit shall
be obtained from the City of Lake Elsinore. All grading shall be completed in accordance
with City standards.
All roadway, drainage, water, reclaimed water, and wastewater development shall be in
accordance with the requirements of Chapters 3 and 4 of the Specific Plan, subject to
modifications pursuant to the processes established in Chapter 6 of the Specific Plan.
Grading activities shall be in substantial compliance with the overall Conceptual Grading
Plan (Figure 2.3-11).
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained weed-free and planted with interim
landscaping such as hydroseed within one year (365 days)of completion of grading, unless
building permits are obtained. Temporary irrigation systems may be required.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
PDF-HAZ-1.Compliance with all standards is required through federal, state, county, and municipal
regulations,to reduce the potential for direct impacts to human health and biological resources from
accidental spills of small amounts of hazardous materials from construction equipment during
construction of the buildings, storage, and transport of these materials.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
21
Hydrology and Water Quality
PDF-HYD-1. [Hydrology]A Conditional Letter of Map Revision and Letter of Map Revision would
be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) specifying that the grading
of the Diamond Specific Plan should remove the site from within a FEMA 100-Year Flood Zone.
PDF-HYD-2. [Flood storage] The Diamond Specific Plan is required to adhere to the existing Back
Basin United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit which requires a HEC-5 flood
storage analysis to ensure that the project does not affect the base flood elevation in the back
basin. The concept grading plan indicates that the flood storage volume provided at completion of
the project exceeds the minimum required to maintain the base flood elevation. At the local level,
the City would require certification by a registered professional engineer, prior to any import of
fill and/or construction, demonstrating that the cumulative effect of obstructions and/or imported
fill shall not result in any increase in the base flood elevation during the occurrence of the base
flood discharge [Ord. 1078 § 15.64.110, 2001] and submittal to FEMA of a Conditional Letter of
Map Revision based on Fill (CLOMR-F), Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) or Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
PDF-HYD-3. [Water quality]In accordance with Santa Ana Regional Drainage Area Management
Plan (SAR-DAMP) and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, an
applicant for a project encompassing more than five acres is required to develop and implement a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition, the City shall ensure that construction
activity is in compliance with the State’s General Permit for Construction Activities administered by
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), located in Riverside (Santa Ana,
Region 8). One condition of this permit is the development and implementation of a site-specific
SWPPP that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce/eliminate erosion and
sedimentation associated with construction.
The objective of the SWPPP is to identify and control storm water discharges due to construction
activity and to identify and implement structural (e.g., silt fences, sandbags, spill control) and non-
structural (e.g., scheduling) BMPs to reduce pollutants in storm water, both before and after
construction. Discharges associated with construction activity are covered under one statewide
General Permit. Coverage under the General Permit requires submittal of a Notice of Intent (NOI)
to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) prior to construction, and development and
implementation of a defensible SWPPP prior to disturbing a site and for the duration of construction.
All construction period non-storm and storm water BMPs shall adhere to the California Stormwater
Quality Association Stormwater Best Management Handbook for Construction.
A project-specific water quality plan has been developed to address storm water runoff
management and water quality treatment objectives and sets forth an integrated approach
involving the utilization of BMPs designed to: (1) function with the drainage plan for the project site
and offsite areas; and (2) to address treatment of urban and storm water runoff. The sizing of
treatment control BMPs for the proposed project is based upon a criteria established by the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the discharge of urban runoff.
The project site is located within the region covered by the Watershed-wide Waste Discharge
Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with New Development within the
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
22
San Jacinto Watershed (Order 01-34, NPDES CAG 618005).The order requires that all
development projects tributary to Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore obtain an NPDES permit, and
implement best available technology (BAT) that is economically achievable and best conventional
technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution, including the preparation of a
SWPPP.
The proposed project would feature on-site BMPs consisting of Extended Detention Basins (volume-
based) and Grassed Swales (flow-based) designed to address storm water runoff management
and water quality treatment objectives. The Water Quality Management Plan sets forth an
integrated approach to water quality involving the utilization of treatment control BMPs designed
to function with the drainage plan for the project site; and to address treatment of urban and storm
water runoff.Specifically, the following treatment BMPs would reduce storm water flow:
An extended detention basin, designed according to criteria set forth and defined by
Riverside County, should detain and slowly release the design volume of stormwater.
Two grassed swales constructed according to County criteria should receive and slow
nuisance flows and first flush flows from each of the drainage areas.
An infiltration basin shall allow storm water runoff to gradually replete the groundwater
basin.
Permeable area of the project should be maximized.
Landscaped buffer areas should be incorporated between sidewalks and streets.
Onsite ponding areas and retention facilities should increase opportunities for infiltration.
Streets, sidewalks, and parking aisles should be constructed to the minimum widths
necessary, provided the walkable environment and pedestrians’ public safety is not
compromised.
Where off-street parking is available, street widths should be reduced.
The use of impervious surfaces should be minimized in the landscape design.
Where landscaping is proposed in parking areas, landscaping should be incorporated into
the drainage design.
Water quality education should be given to property owners, operators, tenants, occupants,
and employees.
Activity restrictions shall be in place to control water pollution sources.
Irrigation systems and landscaping should have appropriate maintenance.
Common area litter control shall be in place.
Street sweeping of private streets and parking lots shall occur.
Maintenance of the above-listed BMPs is expected to be financed through a community facilities
district, home owners association, or other similar organizations. The proposed system of on-site
water quality and infiltration basins and swales would provide appropriate levels of treatment for
all on-site generated flows.
Land Use and Planning
PDF-LU-1.The proposed project should implement design guidelines and policies which implement
the goals of the Ballpark District and the Community Design Element. The design guidelines outlined
in the Specific Plan are intended to create a landmark for the City and enhance the community
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
23
character surrounding the Diamond Stadium. The project includes design guidelines and
development standards in compliance with the current General Plan (1990) and General Plan
Update (2009) to increase the visibility and development potential for the site.
Noise
PDF-NSE-1.No use, activity or process shall produce continual vibrations or noxious odors that are
perceptible without instruments by the average person at the property lines of the site or within the
interior of residential units on the site.
PDF-NSE-2. [City of Lake Elsinore Noise Ordinance] According to the City of Lake Elsinore Noise
Ordinance, the maximum exterior noise levels not to be exceeded for more than 30 minutes from
stationary or commercial facility related noises to multi-family residential land uses are 45 dBA
from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 50 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. For general commercial land uses, the
exterior noise levels cannot exceed 60 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 65 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10
p.m.
For interior noise levels, the maximum interior noise levels for all residential uses are 35 dBA from
10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 40 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and shall not be exceeded for more than five
minutes in any hour.
Additionally, the City of Lake Elsinore standards for stationary source noise impacts limits operation
of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work
between the weekday hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. and during weekends or holidays.
Public Services
PDF-PS-1. [Fire]
During construction and operation of the proposed project, compliance with all applicable
fire code and ordinance requirements would be required and conditioned to the proposed
project. The project would comply with the 2009 International Fire Code, California Building
Code, and applicable Riverside County Fire Department Code requirements and standards
for construction, access, water mains, fire flow, and fire hydrants.
All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in
accordance with the appropriate sections of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or
No. 787, subject to review and approval by the Riverside County Fire Department.
Fire flow requirements within commercial projects are based on square footage and type
of construction of the structures. The minimum fire flow for any commercial structure is 1,500
gallons per minute, at a residual operating pressure of 20-psi, and can rise to 8,000 gallons
per minute, (per Table A-III of the California Fire Code).
PDF-PS-2. [Schools]The proposed project would be required to pay applicable development fees
levied by Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) pursuant to the School Facilities Act (Senate
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
24
Bill [SB] 50, Stats. 1998, c.407) to offset these impacts on school facilities resulting from new
development.
Recreation
PDF-REC-1. Pursuant to City standards, five acres of park area are to be dedicated for each 1,000
subdivision residents, cash in-lieu fees,or a combination of both, as a condition of residential
development approval.
Transportation and Traffic
PDF-TR-2. [Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee]The Western Riverside Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program evolved from the need to establish a comprehensive funding source
for regional arterial highway improvements for western Riverside County. This program (adopted
December 2002) establishes a single uniform mitigation fee to mitigate the cumulative regional
impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system. It was adopted with the
intention to avoid multiple, discrete fee programs with varying policies, fees, and improvement
projects. The project proponent would contribute the required amount per dwelling unit TUMF for
funding regional transportation improvements.
PDF-TR-3. [Site Access and Circulation]Roadway classifications within the project site have been
designed in accordance with the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. The City’s General Plan
Circulation Element designates specific design criteria for street improvements.Implementation of
the design criteria assures that all street improvements are safely designed. The proposed project
would comply with all specified design criteria.
PDF-TR-4. [Alternative Transportation Modes]The Riverside Transit Agency currently provides bus
service along Lakeshore Drive and Mission Trail with stops near the Diamond Specific Plan at
Railroad Canyon Road and Malaga Road. In order to provide public transit service to the residents
and visitors of the Diamond area, the Specific Plan shall incorporate “transit ready” features in
order to accommodate public transit service once it becomes available. Potential public transit stop
locations are included in the Circulation Plan. Bus stops/turnouts would be developed according to
RTA standards.
The project should provide interconnections of land uses that are considerate of pedestrians,
bicyclists, public transit riders and motorists. A pedestrian and cyclist network should connect the
different planning areas within the Specific Plan area. The project area shall be connected to land
uses north and south of it by the Regional Trail and the Community Trail.
PDF-TR-5. [Emergency Access]Sight distance at each project access should be reviewed with
respect to standard California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore sight distance
standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
25
Utilities and Service Systems
PDF-UTL-1.All utilities, except electrical lines over 12 kilovolts (kV), shall be placed underground.
PDF-UTL-2.[Water] Water lines and connections would be installed in accordance with the
requirements and specifications of the City and EVMWD.In addition, assurance of the provision of
adequate water service is required to be provided prior to the approval of a subdivision map
and/or plot plan for new residential development of 500 homes or more, in accordance with Senate
Bill (SB) 221.The proposed water system shall be designated to minimize the requirements of future
system maintenance.
A reclaimed water system should be constructed to provide for landscape irrigation and other non-
potable uses, unless the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) determines that
reclaimed water meeting heath standards is not currently available and will not be available to
the project site in the foreseeable future.
Development within The Diamond Specific Plan should comply with:
Title 20, California Code of Regulations Section 1604 (f) (Appliance Efficiency Standards),
which establishes efficiency standards for all new showerheads and lavatory faucets; and
Health and Safety Code Section 17621.3, which requires low-flow toilets and urinals in
virtually all buildings.
PDF-UTL-3.[Wastewater] All wastewater lines and disposal facilities should be designed and
constructed per City of Lake Elsinore and EVMWD requirements.
The proposed wastewater system shall be designed to adequately accommodate anticipated waste
flows resulting from the project.
Sewer-related infrastructure should be designed and installed in accordance with the requirements
and specifications of the City, EVMWD, Riverside County Department of Health, and RWQCB.
PDF-UTL-4.[Solid waste] A construction waste recycling program should be established with a
local waste management company to maximize waste recycling and to reach the 50 percent
diversion goals.
The proposed project should comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and
regulation related to solid waste, including the County’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element
(SRRE), Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE), and City Ordinance 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code regarding construction debris removal.
PDF-UTL-5.[Gas] Gas-related infrastructure and necessary extensions would be installed in
accordance with the requirements and specifications of the City and the California Public Utilities
Commission.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
26
3.4 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The site’s General Plan and zoning designations are Specific Plan. The applicable specific plan for
the site is the DSP; the project is consistent with the Mixed-Use designation provided for the site in
the DSP.
3.5 DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD-OUT
The approved 86.4-acre DSP allows for a total of 600 dwelling units, 897,000 SF of commercial
development, 150 hotel rooms, and 10 acres of commercial uses. No residential, commercial, or
hotel development has occurred within the DSP since adoption of the Specific Plan. While the DSP
analyzed various types and quantities of development within six PAs and three phases of
development, the presence of an overall cap for development within the Specific Plan area allows
for the transfer or replacement of uses within PAs and phases while avoiding any potential for an
increase to environmental impacts.
Within the 11.27-acre project site (Phase 3B), the DSP EIR analyzed 100 dwelling units, 90,000 SF
of office uses, and 20,000 SF of shopping center uses. The modified project therefore results in a
net decrease of 99 dwelling units and 90,000 SF of office uses, and a net increase of 130 hotel
rooms and 75,000 SF of shopping center uses within Phase 3B.
A separate project, the Lake Elsinore Diamond Stadium Sports Complex (Sports Complex), is being
processed concurrently with the modified project. The Sports Complex consists of up to 520,000
square feet of built space consisting of up to 58 volleyball courts or 33 basketball courts, stadium
seating, and ancillary support uses. This facility is located within PA 2 – Community Core of the DSP,
which was analyzed for development as Phase 1 and a portion of Phase 2B in the DSP EIR. A small
portion of this facility’s parking requirement (75 out of 2,880 spaces) would be provided adjacent
to the modified project, at a new parking area located at the southeast corner of Diamond Drive
and Campbell Street, within PA 5. To accommodate the new sports complex use, which was not
contemplated as part of the DSP, 275 dwelling units and 625,000 SF of shopping center uses are
proposed for removal from DSP buildout.
The overall adjustment in land uses in the DSP, including both the modified project and the Sports
Complex, consists of a decrease of 374 dwelling units and 640,000 SF of commercial uses, and an
increase of 520,000 square feet of sports uses and 130 hotel rooms.
3.6 DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUESTED
The modified project would require a number of local and state permits and approvals from various
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. These include, but may not be limited to the permits and
approvals described below.
City of Lake Elsinore
Approval of Commercial Design Review (CDR 2016-07)
Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 37253)
Approval of Residential Design Review (RDR 2016-
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
27
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
28
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
4.1 BACKGROUND
Date: September 20,2016
Project Title:
Artisan Alley
Lead Agency:
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, Calif. 92530
Lead Agency Contact:
Justin Kirk, Principal Planner
(951) 674-3124 x284
Project Location:
11.27-acre site at the northeast corner of Diamond Drive and Malaga Road, Lake Elsinore
Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:
Civic Partners – Elsinore, LLC
c/o Jeff Pomeroy
7777 Center Avenue, Suite 230
Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647
General Plan and Zoning Designation:
General Plan: Specific Plan
Zoning: Specific Plan
Project Description:
The modified project includes the development of a 95,000-SF commercial center, 1 live-work
dwelling unit, and a 130-room hotel. A more detailed description of the modified project is
provided in Section 3, Modified Project Description.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The project site is bounded on the west by Diamond Stadium, on the north by vacant lands, on
the east by a shopping center, and on the south by single-family residential development.
Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required:
Ministerial permits are required from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System compliance and the Riverside County Fire
Department for site plan review.
4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or
to be previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
29
in project, change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance, as indicated by
the checklist and discussion on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture & Forest
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population / Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation/Traffic Utilities / Service
Systems
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
4.3 DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation
No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes
in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major
revisions to the previous approved ND or MND or certified EIR due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance"
as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously
adopted ND or MND or previously certified EIR adequately discusses the potential
impacts of the project without modification.
No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes
in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major
revisions to the previous approved ND or MND or certified EIR due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance"
as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously
adopted ND, MND or previously certified EIR adequately discusses the potential impacts
of the project; however, minor changes require the preparation of an ADDENDUM.
Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the
circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions
to the previous ND, MND or EIR due to the involvement of significant new environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However, all new potentially significant environmental
effects or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant effects
are clearly reduced to below a level of significance through the incorporation of
mitigation measures agreed to by the project applicant. Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT MND
is required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
30
Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the
circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions
to the previous environmental document due to the involvement of significant new
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term
is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However, only minor changes or
additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the
project in the changed situation. Therefore, a SUPPLEMENTAL EIR is required.
Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the
circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions
to the previous environmental document due to the involvement of significant new
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term
is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) such as one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR. Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT EIR is required.
Signature Date
Printed Name and Title
City of Lake Elsinore
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
31
4.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section is intended to provide evidence to substantiate the conclusions set forth in the
Environmental Checklist. The section briefly summarizes conclusions in the DSP EIR, and discusses the
consistency of the Artisan Alley modified project with the findings contained in the DSP EIR.
Mitigation measures referenced are from the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program adopted
as part of the DSP EIR.
In Section 4 and 5,the Environmental Checklist identifies the environmental effects of the modified
project in comparison with the development contemplated in the certified DSP EIR. This comparative
analysis has been undertaken, pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA, to provide the factual basis
for determining whether any changes in the project, any changes in the circumstances, or any new
information requires additional environmental review or preparation of a subsequent or
supplemental EIR.Some changes and additions to the DSP EIR and related Findings and Statement
of Overriding Considerations are required for the Modified project, but such changes and additions
do not involve new significant environmental impacts, a substantial increase in severity of significant
impacts previously identified, substantial changes to the circumstances under which the modified
project is undertaken involving such new impacts or such a substantial increase in the severity of
significant impacts, or new information of substantial importance as meant by CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162. As such this Addendum is the appropriate means to document these textual changes.
The basis for the findings listed in the Environmental Checklist are explained in Section 5,
Environmental Analysis.
Terminology Used in the Checklist
For each question listed in the Environmental Checklist, a determination of the level of significance
of the impact is provided. Impacts are categorized in the following categories:
Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects. A
Subsequent EIR is required when 1) substantial project changes are proposed or substantial changes
to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, and 2) those changes result in new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects, and 3) project changes require major revisions of the EIR.1
New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR.A Subsequent EIR is
required if new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified, shows 1)
the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; or 2) significant effects
previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR.2
New Information Identifying New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is
Declined. A Subsequent EIR is required if new information of substantial importance, which was not
known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR
was certified shows 1) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would
in fact be feasible (or new mitigation measures or alternatives are considerably different) and
would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents
1 CEQA Guidelines. California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, § 15162, as amended.
2 CEQA Guidelines. § 15162.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
32
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
3
With regard to the foregoing three categories, a Supplement to an EIR can be prepared if the
criterion for a Subsequent EIR is met, and only minor additions or changes would be necessary to
make the EIR adequately apply to the modified project.4
Minor Technical Changes or Additions. An Addendum to the EIR is required if only minor technical
changes or additions are necessary and none of the criteria for a subsequent EIR is met.5
No Impact.A designation of no impact is given when the modified project would have no changes
in the environment as compared to the original project analyzed in the EIR.
3 CEQA Guidelines. § 15162.
4 CEQA Guidelines. § 15163.
5 CEQA Guidelines. § 15164.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
33
5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This section provides evidence to substantiate the conclusions in the environmental checklist. The
section will briefly summarize the conclusions of the DSP EIR, and then discuss whether or not the
Modified project is consistent with the findings contained in the DSP EIR, or if further analysis is
required in a subsequent EIR. Mitigation measures referenced herein are from the DSP EIR.
5.1 AESTHETICS Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the Lake Elsinore shoreline along the western edge of the DSP as being a
scenic resource. PA 3 of the DSP was identified as having the greatest potential to impact this scenic
vista due to its location on the waterfront. The DSP EIR determined that the implementation of the
aesthetics PDFs, development standards, and design guidelines of the DSP would result in scenic
vistas being preserved. This impact was considered less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale standards of the DSP. Most structures on the site would be single story; one structure
would be two stories and the hotel would rise to four stories. The building heights are consistent with
the 5-story/60-foot height restriction of the DSP. The modified project is located in PA 5, inland
from the shoreline and in an area that is not sensitive to viewers. Reducing impacts are two PDFs,
numbered below as PDF-AES-1 and PDF-AES-2, which require the modified project to conform to
the DSP’s design guidelines and include trees throughout parking lots.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
34
The modified project would not result in an adverse effect on a scenic vista and no mitigation would
be required. The modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in the DSP EIR and the
level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR. The
modified project would result in similar visual changes to those previously analyzed.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified no designated scenic highways in the project vicinity; I-15, located 0.5 mile
east of the site, is identified as being eligible for scenic designation. The DSP EIR also found no rock
outcroppings or historic buildings on the site. The DSP EIR determined the implementation of the DSP
would not result any blocking of views of natural features along the eligible scenic highway
segment. The impact was considered less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale standards of the DSP. There are no new project features that differ significantly
from those reviewed in the DSP EIR, which could create new impacts on scenic resources within a
state scenic highway.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR acknowledged that build-out of the DSP would change the visual character of the site
by building on undeveloped land. This was identified as the long-term intention of the City, which
established various commercial and institutional land use designations in the area prior to
establishment of the DSP. In addition, the DSP included development standards and design
guidelines that would ensure a degree of consistency with existing surrounding development and
avoid blocking views of scenic vistas (the Lake Elsinore shoreline). Further, the design guidelines and
development standards were identified in the DSP EIR to promote: (1) well-designed buildings that
contribute to a sense of quality and permanence; (2) a pattern and scale of development that
creates a well-defined, human-scale public environment that incorporates active, pedestrian-
oriented street level uses that animate and enliven the public realm; (3) a safe and attractive system
of streets, parks and civic spaces; and (4) a visually and aesthetically distinctive identity that
incorporates water as a thematic element. Based on these factors, the impact was considered less
than significant.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
35
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
The modified project is the build-out of the DSP as analyzed in the DSP EIR. As required by PDF-
AES-1, the modified project maintains the development standards and design guidelines as
previously evaluated. The modified project would also be subject to PDF-AES-2, which requires the
placement of trees throughout parking areas to reduce visual impacts. There is no increase in impacts
to undeveloped lands or significant change in the use of lands that could cause a change in the
significance of impacts to visual character and quality.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the implementation of the DSP would increase lighting in the area by
replacing undeveloped land with urban land uses. However, the implementation of Municipal Code
requirements, particularly related to orientation and shielding of light fixtures to reduce glare and
avoid direct illumination, was considered adequate to reduce lighting impacts to a less than
significant level.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
The modified project includes the same type and scale of development as analyzed in the DSP EIR.
There are no new architectural elements or other design features that would significantly increase
lighting or glare levels beyond those that were previously expected on the site. The modified
project’s lighting plan includes LED fixtures that are appropriately shielded and directed to avoid
unnecessary or excessive off-site lighting. Standards to minimize lighting and glare impacts,
including compliance with Municipal Code standards, are incorporated into the project through PDF-
AES-3.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding aesthetics. There have
not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
36
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to
significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could not have
been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-AES-1.The project will conform to the design guidelines presented in the Diamond Specific
Plan.
PDF-AES-2. Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking
rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at time of installation.
PDF-AES-3. [Light or glare]All lighting is required to comply with the City of Lake Elsinore lighting
ordinance including the siting and direction of light fixtures. Lighting fixtures should be shielded to
minimize unwanted spillover and glare. All outdoor lighting fixtures in excess of 60 watts would be
oriented and shielded to reduce glare or direct and reduce illumination onto adjacent properties
or streets. Low pressure sodium lighting in accordance with the Mount Palomar Observatory lighting
standards shall be required. Building finishes will be non-reflective.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe aesthetic impacts would result from the adoption and
implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are
required for aesthetics and visual quality. No refinements related to the modified project are
necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
37
5.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST
RESOURCES
Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation
as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture
and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding
the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment
Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology
provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air
Resources Board. Would the project:
Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to
non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due
to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberlandzoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
38
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The Initial Study to the DSP EIR determined that the site contained no mapped Farmland, Williamson
Act contracts, or agricultural zoning. The site also contains no forest land or zoning for forests or
timberland. It was also established that no nearby agricultural or forest land existed that would
have the potential to be converted to non-agricultural or non-forest use as a result of the project.
This impact was considered less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project is located on the same site that was analyzed in the DSP EIR
and found to contain no agricultural resources, including mapped Farmland, Williamson Act
contracts, or agricultural zoning. In addition, the site has no forest land, is not zoned forest land or
timberland, and there are no nearby forest land properties that would have the potential to be
converted to non-forest use as a result of the project. There is no impact to agriculture or forest
resources resulting from the modified project.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate modified project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding agriculture
and forest resources. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of
the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial
importance relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known
and could not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The DSP EIR did not include any PDFs applicable to agriculture and forest resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe agriculture and forest resources impacts would result
from the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised
mitigation measures are required for agriculture and forest resources. No refinements related to
the modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation
measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
39
5.3 AIR QUALITY Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Where available, the significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management or air pollution control
district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment
under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that buildout of the DSP would be consistent with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The impact associated with a conflict
of the applicable air quality plan was found to be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project proposes the same land uses and, when combined with the
modifications to the DSP build-out associated with the Sports Complex, a lower intensity of
development than previously analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project would not require any
changes to the certified DSP EIR related to the AQMP. Compliance with SCAQMD Rules to ensure
consistency with the AQMP is incorporated into the project by PDF-AQ-1. As shown in the Trip
Generation Assessment (Appendix A), operation of the modified project, when combined with the
modifications to the DSP build-out associated with the Sports Complex, would result in a significant
decline of 11,213 daily vehicle trips, resulting in a substantial reduction in air pollutant emissions as
compared to that analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project would be consistent with the AQMP,
and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP
EIR.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
40
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that construction activities associated with buildout of the DSP would, prior
to mitigation, generate a substantial increase in particulate (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions that
exceed the threshold criteria and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations
of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The implementation of mitigation measure DSP-AQ-1 would
reduce construction-period emissions to below a level of significance.
The DSP EIR also identified unmitigated operational emissions exceeding thresholds for reactive
organic gases (ROG), NOx, CO, and particulate matter; the long-term operation of the DSP
facilities would therefore generate a substantial increase in criteria air pollutant emissions that
exceed the threshold criteria and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations
of the SoCAB. This was considered a potentially significant impact to air quality. The DSP EIR
determined buildout of the DSP would not result in creation of a CO hotspot. Mitigation to reduce
criteria air pollutant impacts was provided in mitigation measure DSP-AQ-2 for operational
emissions; however, the implementation of this mitigation measure would not be adequate to reduce
impacts to criteria pollutants to below a level of significance. The DSP EIR determined that the level
of significance of operational emissions after mitigation was significant and unavoidable.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. Construction of the modified project would be subject to mitigation
measure DSP-AQ-1, and additional measures to minimize emissions are included as PDF-AQ-1.
Operation of the modified project, when combined with the modifications to the DSP build-out
associated with the Sports Complex, would result in a significant decline of 11,213 daily vehicle
trips, resulting in a substantial reduction in air pollutant emissions as compared to that analyzed in
the DSP EIR. Operation of the modified project would be subject to mitigation measure DSP-AQ-2
and to the additional measures incorporated into the project as PDF-AQ-1.
The modified project would not result in a net increase in construction- or operational-period
emissions compared to the prior analysis. No new impact would occur and the modified project
would not require any changes to the certified DSP EIR related to air pollutant emissions. The
modified project would have the same level of impact (significant and unavoidable) as that cited
in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-AQ-1.During construction, the contractor shall implement the following measures:
Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas.
Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil
disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph.
Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed.
Water exposed surfaces and haul roads three times/day.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
41
Cover all stock piles with tarps.
Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible.
Reduce speeds on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph.
Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off-road equipment.
Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available.
Utilize diesel particulate filter on heavy equipment where feasible.
DSP-AQ-2.Prior to issuance of a building permit(s), the applicant shall provide an exhibit
demonstrating that the following measures have been incorporated into the overall Diamond
Specific Plan design to reduce reliance on the single occupancy vehicle. These provisions shall be
made a Condition of Approval on the tentative map(s) as part of street improvements.
Provide for increased utilization of public transit by providing a park-and-ride facility and
opportunities on-site for the future shuttle link to the planned Metrolink station in Perris or
downtown Lake Elsinore. If the Metrolink station in Perris or downtown Lake Elsinore is not
implemented, the project would not be required to provide the shuttle link on the project
site.
Provide one or more secure, convenient bus stop locations, including, where feasible, seating,
signage, shelters, and trash receptacles.
Provide safe, appropriately lighted, and attractively landscaped physical linkages
between land uses that encourage bicycling and walking as alternatives to driving through
the provision of bike lanes and/or walking paths.
Off-street bicycle parking shall be distributed throughout the commercial areas of the
Diamond Specific Plan and placed conveniently near building entrances without obstructing
pedestrian movement.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the DSP would contribute to an incremental impact on declining
cumulative air quality conditions. Buildout of the DSP in conjunction with other related developments
projected within the vicinity of the site would generate increased air emissions. Increased air
emissions would result from increased mobile and stationary sources. The SoCAB is a non-attainment
area for federal and state O3 and PM10 standards as well as state PM2.5 standards, and the
cumulative emissions impact would reduce the SCAQMD’s ability to achieve conformance with the
air quality significance thresholds. Implementation of the DSP would result in significant cumulative
impacts to air quality during short-term construction and long-term operational phases.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. Construction of the modified project would be subject to mitigation
measure DSP-AQ-1 as well as additional measures incorporated into the project as PDF-AQ-1.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
42
Operation of the modified project, when combined with the modifications to the DSP associated
with the Sports Complex, would result in reduced air pollutant emissions as compared to that
analyzed in the DSP EIR. Operation of the modified project would be subject to mitigation measure
DSP-AQ-2 and to the additional measures in PDF-AQ-1.
The modified project would not result in a net increase in construction- or operational-period
emissions compared to the prior analysis, and would therefore not contribute to cumulative air
quality impacts beyond the prior analysis. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR related to cumulative air pollutant emissions. The modified project would have
the same level of impact (significant and unavoidable) as that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
See DSP-AQ-1 and DSP-AQ-2, above. It was determined that no mitigation measures were
available that would reduce operational impacts below SCAQMD’s thresholds.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that construction activities associated with buildout of the DSP would result
in exceedances of localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).
The implementation of mitigation measure DSP-AQ-1 reduced this impact to below a level of
significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The project proposes the same land uses as previously analyzed in the DSP EIR;
when combined with the modifications to the DSP associated with the Sports Complex, the intensity
of development is reduced, including a substantial reduction in emissions-generating vehicle trips.
The modified project would not require any changes to the certified DSP EIR related to the
exceedances of LSTs. The application of mitigation measure DSP-AQ-1 and PDF-AQ-1 minimize
impacts to sensitive receptors. The modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP
EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated) remains
unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measure Adopted by the DSP EIR
See DSP-AQ-1, above. It was determined that no mitigation measures were available that would
reduce impacts to sensitive receptors to below SCAQMD’s thresholds.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the intermittent and short-term nature of construction odors associated
with diesel and gasoline exhaust, asphalt paving, and the application of architectural coatings, and
the nature and uses of permanent facilities within the DSP, would not have the potential to create
odor impacts affecting a substantial number of people. The impact associated with the generation
of objectionable odors was found to be less than significant.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
43
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting
objectionable odors, and the construction and operational characteristics of the modified project
are consistent with those analyzed in the DSP EIR. No new or substantially greater impacts would
occur with implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP
EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact
(less than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate modified project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding air quality.
There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDF included in the DSP EIR is applicable to the modified project:
PDF-AQ-1.As a condition of project approval, the project must adhere to SCAQMD Rules 403
(Fugitive Dust Control), 431.2 (Low Sulfur Fuel), 1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers) and 1113
(Architectural Coatings) during construction-related activities. Rule 1113 limits the VOC content of
architectural coatings by providing numeric standards for VOC concentrations per volume of
coating. SCAQMD Rule 403 includes a menu of fugitive dust control measures to which the project
must adhere, including, but not limited to:
Dust Control
Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas.
Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil
disturbance on unpaved surfaces when winds exceed 25 mph.
Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed.
Active construction areas shall be watered at least three times per day.
All haul trucks shall be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
All unpaved parking or staging areas shall be watered four times daily.
Site access points shall be swept or washed within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition
on any public roadway.
All stock piles on-site of debris, dirt, or other dusty material shall be covered or watered
three times daily.
Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible.
Any cleared area that is to remain inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing shall be
stabilized.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
44
Reduce speeds on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph.
Exhaust Emissions
Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off-road equipment.
Limit allowable idling to five minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available.
Utilize diesel particulate filter on heavy equipment where feasible.
Painting and Coatings
Use low VOC coatings and high pressure-low volume sprayers.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe air quality impacts would result from the adoption
and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are
required for air quality. No refinements related to the modified project are necessary to the DSP
EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
45
5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section
404 of the Clean Water Act through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
46
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified sensitive vegetation communities within the DSP to include tamarisk/willow
scrub, located in the far west of the DSP area. Riparian/riverine habitat and jurisdictional wetlands
and drainages are also present in the far west of the DSP area. All of these features are located
outside of the area affected by the modified project; no sensitive vegetation community, riparian
habitat, or other sensitive natural community, or jurisdictional wetlands or drainages are present on
the project site.
One sensitive plant species, smooth tarplant, was observed within the project site. A total of 280
smooth tarplant plants were identified within the site, out of a total 12,100 of the species within the
DSP. Impacts to smooth tarplant were considered significant. Mitigation measure DSP-BIO-1
reduced this impact to below a level of significance. The other sensitive plant species identified
within the DSP, little mousetail, was only located west of Diamond Stadium, outside of the project
site. Therefore, the mitigation measure intended to protect little mousetail, DSP-BIO-2, is not
applicable to the modified project.
Various sensitive wildlife species were identified within the DSP during field surveys; all of these
species were determined to not be significantly impacted by the buildout of the DSP, or to have
impacts that were fully mitigated through payment of mandatory Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. Burrowing owl was not identified on site; however, due to the
presence of suitable habitat for this species on-site, there was found to be a potentially significant
impact to this species. Mitigation measure DSP-BIO-3 reduced this impact to below a level of
significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is located on the same site and would have the same extent
of impacts as analyzed in the DSP EIR. There would no increase in the amount of land converted to
developed uses as a result of the modified project There would no change in the degree of impacts
to sensitive plant or wildlife species, vegetation, or natural communities or to jurisdictional wetlands
or drainages. Further reducing impacts are PDF-BIO-1, which reduces indirect impacts to biological
resources, and PDF-BIO-2 through PDF-BIO-4, which require actions to minimize exotic plant and
animal infestations.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation incorporated)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-BIO-1.Prior to issuance of a grading permit(s) for portions of the Diamond Specific Plan with
smooth tarplant (Figure 4.3-7), the applicant shall implement the following measures to conserve
the smooth tarplant population, resulting in 1.35 acres (0.68 acre on-site and 0.67 acre off-site) or
90 percent of the existing smooth tarplant population) of smooth tarplant mitigation:
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
47
An applicant-retained qualified biologist shall prepare a transplantation plan outlining
implementation of the proposed mitigation plan. The plan shall outline the details of the
following transplantation requirements:
a. Prior to disturbance activities, 0.68 acres of smooth tarplant shall be translocated
on-site (i.e., seeded with seeds collected from the existing population on-site) along
the western boundary of the Diamond Specific Plan, contiguous to the existing
populations of smooth tarplant which currently exist on-site.
b. Prior to disturbance activities, approximately 0.67 acre of smooth tarplant shall also
be translocated off-site, as shown in Figure 4.3-7.
All mitigation areas shall be placed under a conservation easement, deed restriction, or
comparable legal instrument which restricts land uses and provides for their long-term
preservation.
DSP-BIO-3.Due to the presence of suitable habitat onsite for the western burrowing owl, a qualified
biologist shall conduct pre-construction focused species surveys within 30 days prior to any ground-
disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present. If burrowing owls are
determined to occupy the project site during pre-construction surveys, CDFW shall be consulted and
a passive relocation program shall be undertaken to relocate owls to an area outside the impact
zone. The relocation shall be conducted following accepted protocols and would occur outside of
the breeding season for the burrowing owl. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are
vacated.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR established that the western border of the DSP area is within the MSHCP’s Proposed
Extension of Existing Core 3 and a small portion of the northwestern corner of the DSP, which
currently exists as a commercial development, lies within Proposed Linkage 8. The DSP EIR further
noted that apart from these edge areas, the remainder of the DSP area is not expected to support
the species identified for conservation under the proposed core extension and proposed linkage
due to the lack of suitable riparian scrub, woodland, forest, or grassland habitat. Therefore, the
DSP was found to not significantly impact movement within or along these MSHCP corridors.
The DSP area was found to have the potential to support both raptor and songbird nests due to
the presence of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. A significant impact was identified; this impact was
reduced to below a level of significance through the implementation of mitigation measure DSP-
BIO-6.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.There are no wildlife corridors or nursing sites that would be affected by the
modified project. Compliance with mitigation measure DSP-BIO-6 would reduce any impacts
related to nesting birds to below a level of significance.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
48
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation incorporated)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-BIO-6.The Applicant shall be responsible for implementing mitigation to reduce impacts to
migratory and/or nesting bird species to below a level of significance through one of two ways:
(1) Vegetation removal activities shall be scheduled outside the nesting season (September 1 to
February 14) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. This will ensure that no active nests will be
disturbed and that habitat removal could proceed rapidly; (2) Any construction activities that occur
during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31) shall require that all suitable habitat be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before
commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet
for raptors) will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as
determined by the biological monitor to minimize impacts.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The only local policy or ordinance to protect biological resources of local concern in the City of Lake
Elsinore is the Palm Tree Preservation Ordinance, No. 1044. The DSP EIR determined that no species
within the DSP area are protected by this ordinance.
Additionally, the DSP EIR determined that habitat appropriate for the Stephen’s kangaroo rat is
present throughout the DSP area. Although the habitat is disturbed and there is a low potential for
the species to occur, a significant impact was identified. The implementation of mitigation measure
DSP-BIO-7 reduced this impact to below a level of significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project would not affect any biological resources protected by local
ordinance. The modified project would not increase impacts to Stephen’s kangaroo rat habitat
beyond that which has already been analyzed; the project would be subject to the DSP EIR
mitigation measure to minimize impacts to this species.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the
impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation
incorporated) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-BIO-7.To reduce impacts to the Stephen’s kangaroo rat, the project shall pay Riverside County
SKR Habitat Conservation Plan Fees of $500 per gross acre to reduce impacts as established by
Riverside County Ordinance 663.The mitigation fee shall be required prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. If a deferral agreement instrument is recorded by the Applicant, the fee may be
deferred to the issuance of the first building permit within the development. Fee amounts are
determined by Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency (TLMA) Building &
Safety and Planning Land Use staff and can be paid at any TLMA Permit Assistance Center.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
49
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The applicable Habitat Conservation Plans for the DSP EIR are the MSHCP and the SKR Habitat
Conservation Plan. The DSP EIR determined that, subject to the implementation of mitigation
measures DSP-BIO-7 (related to payment of Stephen’s kangaroo rat mitigation fees), DSP-BIO-8
(related to temporary noise barriers to protect identified Preservation Areas), and DSP-BIO-9 (to
minimize noise from loading docks), the buildout of the DSP would not conflict with these HCPs.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is similar in scope, intensity, and use as that analyzed in the
DSP EIR, and with the implementation of mitigation measures DSP-BIO-7, DSP-BIO-8, and DSP-BIO-
9, there is no potential for the modified project to conflict with the provisions of the MSHCP or SKR
Habitat Conservation Plan.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation incorporated)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-BIO-8.Prior to the commencement of construction activity, a temporary sound wall shall be
erected adjacent to construction between the Diamond Specific Plan’s development footprint and
the Preservation Areas to ensure that wildlife are not subject to noise that would exceed residential
noise standards (65 dBA) or ambient noise levels (whichever is higher). Once construction is
completed, the temporary sound wall shall be removed.
DSP-BIO-9.Loading docks adjacent to the Preservation Areas shall be designed and operated to
maintain noise levels at 65 dBA or ambient noise levels (whichever is higher).
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate modified project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding biological
resources. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous
DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
50
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-BIO-1. [Indirect impacts]The project will implement the following measures to reduce indirect
impacts:
Include landscape controls by installing native landscaping that require minimal water
application;
Select, design, and utilize best management practices (BMPs) including treatment control
BMPs (i.e., constructed wetlands, filter inserts, bio-swales, and catch basins), and site design
BMPs (i.e., landscaping).
Any lighting adjacent to the open space areas near the project should be shielded or
directed away from conserved areas.
A number of non-structural best management practices (BMPs) will minimize the amount of
trash/debris created by the Diamond Specific Plan, including activity restrictions placed on
the tenants, the distribution of educational materials to the tenants, the placement of trash
receptacles in common areas, street sweeping, and the placement and maintenance of inlet
trash racks.
PDF-BIO-2. [Exotic plant and animal infestations]To the maximum extent practicable, native
plants should be used in the landscape plans for the common areas of the project. Native plant
species shall be used in the water quality basins and other restoration and enhancement areas. The
plant palette should be consistent with the MSHCP and should be careful to avoid the species listed
in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP.
PDF-BIO-3. [Exotic plant and animal infestations] Construction shall abide by an integrated pest
management plan which shall include the following weed control measures: preventative practices
to avoid the transport and spread of weeds and weed seed during project development and
operation, use of only certified weed-free hay, straw and other organic mulches to control erosion,
and a plan to control noxious weeds and weeds of local concern within designated open space
areas.
PDF-BIO-4. [Exotic plant and animal infestations] The project shall comply with the MSHCP by
incorporating barriers for proposed land uses adjacent to Preservation Areas to minimize
unauthorized public access, introduction of urban wildlife, and/or illegal dumping within the
Preservation Areas.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe biological resources impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required for biological resources. No refinements related to the Modified project are
necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
51
5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
e) Disturb a tribal cultural resource?
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Based on a records search, field survey, Phase II subsurface evaluation of an identified
archaeological site (CA-RIV-4042), and consultations with American Indian tribal representatives
from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the DSP EIR
concluded that ground disturbance during buildout of the DSP could result in significant impacts to
archaeological resources, paleontological resources, and previously unidentified human remains.
No significant impacts were identified to historical resources. The implementation of mitigation
measures DSP-CR-1 through DSP-CR-9 would reduce all identified impacts to cultural and
paleontological resources to below a level of significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
52
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. Construction of the modified project would be subject to mitigation
measures DSP-CR-1 through DSP-CR-9.
The modified project does not have the potential to increase impacts to cultural and paleontological
resources beyond those that were analyzed in the DSP. No new impact would occur and the
modified project would not require any changes to the certified DSP EIR related to cultural and
paleontological resources. The modified project would have the same level of impact (less than
significant with mitigation incorporated) as that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-CR-1. Prior to issuance of grading permit(s) for the Diamond Specific Plan, the project
applicant shall retain an archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an
effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource
deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
DSP-CR-2.At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact
the appropriate Tribe1 to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and
to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment
and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources,
the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling;
terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites,
and human remains discovered on the site.
DSP-CR-3.Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the project archaeologist shall file a pre-
grading report with the City and County (if required) to document the proposed methodology for
grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified
archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading
activities. In accordance with the agreement required in DSP-CR-2, the archaeological monitor's
authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe
in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.
Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities,
and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the
project archaeologist.
DSP-CR-4.Prior to any grading at or near the vicinity of CA-RIV-4042 within proposed Planning
Area 2, the Developer shall meet and confer with the appropriate Tribe to develop an appropriate
controlled grading plan. The purpose of the controlled grading at and around the site is to afford
the opportunity to determine whether any subsurface resources are associated with the site and if
so, the significance of any such resources. All such controlled grading shall be monitored according
to the provisions of the Agreement required in DSP-CR-2. Soil within archaeological site CA-RIV-
4042 boundaries as recorded in the Phase II testing program and within a buffer zone of 50 feet
surrounding the site shall be systematically removed utilizing a paddle-wheel scraper or other
equipment approved by the project archaeologist and the Native American representative. Soil
shall be removed across the entire site sequentially in individual layers not to exceed four inches at
a time, unless specifically recommended otherwise by the project archaeologist and project Native
American Tribal representative who shall supervise their respective monitors. Further, if subsurface
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
53
resources are discovered at the site, the provisions of DSP-CR-8 shall apply.
DSP-CR-5.If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5
states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the
necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section
5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the
treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains
to be Native American, the NAHC shall be contacted within a reasonable timeframe. Subsequently,
the NAHC shall identify the “most likely descendant.” The most likely descendant shall then make
recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided
in Public Resources Code 5097.98.
DSP-CR-6.The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items,
burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate
Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Said disposition shall entail reburial in area(s) which will
not be subject to further disturbance and which have been determined to be acceptable by the
appropriate Tribe.
DSP-CR-7.All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided
and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible.
DSP-CR-8.If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made
during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate Tribe shall assess
the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such
resources. If the Developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such
resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision.
The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of CEQA with respect to
archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of
the appropriate Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of
the CDD shall be appealable to the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission.
DSP-CR-9.Prior to issuance of a grading permit(s), the applicant shall retain a qualified
paleontological monitor. The paleontological monitor shall be responsible for the following:
Monitoring all grading that includes initial cutting into any area of the project site.
Paleontological monitoring shall occur only for those undisturbed sediments wherein fossil
plant or animal remains are found with no associated evidence of human activity or any
archaeological context.
If any paleontological resources are identified during these activities, the paleontologist
shall temporarily divert construction until the significance of the resources is ascertained.
Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid
construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments which are likely to contain the
remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors shall be empowered to
temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens.
Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described above are not
present or if the fossiliferous units present are determined by a qualified paleontological
monitor to have low potential to contain fossil resources.
All recovered specimens shall be prepared to a point of identification and permanent
preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
54
Specimens shall be identified and curated into an established, accredited, professional
museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. The paleontologist shall have a
written repository agreement in hand prior to the initiation of mitigation activities.
A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of identified specimens shall be
prepared. The report shall address archaeological and paleontological items. This report
shall incorporate the full results of the literature review, as well as the full results of the
recommended review of the records of the Eastern Information Center at the University of
California, Riverside. The report shall be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore prior to the
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding cultural resources.
There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The DSP EIR did not include any PDFs applicable to cultural resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe cultural resources impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required for cultural resources. No refinements related to the modified project are
necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
55
5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued
by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially
result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to
life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i.Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
ii.Strong seismic ground shaking?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR determined the DSP site is not at significant risk of impact from the rupture of a known
earthquake fault. However, the site, like virtually all of Southern California, is susceptible to strong
seismic ground shaking; these impacts were found to be less than significant following
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
56
implementation of standard construction requirements in the California Building Code, including
compliance with the recommendations of a Geotechnical Investigation completed for the project.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. As incorporated into the project through PDF-GEO-2 and PDF-GEO-4,
construction of the modified project would be subject to CBC and other code requirements and
would be required to comply with the recommendations of a Geotechnical Investigation.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
iii.Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR determined the project site had a moderate to low potential for liquefaction. The DSP
EIR concluded that appropriate building foundations and/or improvement of the soils in compliance
with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation would be adequate to reduce impacts
to below a level of significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. Per PDF-GEO-2 and PDF-GEO-4, construction of the modified project
would be subject to CBC and other code requirements and would be required to comply with the
recommendations of a Geotechnical Investigation.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
iv.Landslides?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found that the site has been relatively stable in recent geologic history and has not
been subject to earthquake-induced large-scale land sliding, and concluded that the site is therefore
at low risk of landslides; the impact was determined to be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. Per PDF-GEO-2, construction of the modified project would be subject
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
57
to CBC requirements and would be required to comply with the recommendations of a Geotechnical
Investigation.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found the site to have a moderate potential for erosion. The risk of erosion was
determined to be reduced to below a level of significance through the implementation of standard
requirements, including preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) with an
Erosion Control Plan, in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
requirements. The SWPPP would contain Best Available Technology (BAT) and Best Conventional
Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate soil erosion from areas of construction
activity.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale of the DSP, and would utilize the same construction methods as the previously-
analyzed project. Adherence to the BATs and BCTs in the SWPPP, as required by PDF-GEO-3,
would reduce, prevent, or minimize soil erosion from project-related grading and construction
activities. After project completion, the project site would be developed with commercial uses,
paved parking areas, and landscape improvements, and would not contain exposed soil. Upon
project completion, the potential for soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be expected to be
extremely low.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
See response to Section 5.6a), above. The DSP EIR established that the soils on the project site have
a low to moderate potential for expansion, and subject to compliance with CBC standards and the
recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation, which calls for the addition of compacted
engineered fill to portions of the site, the DSP EIR concluded the risks of landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse resulting from implementation of the project would be less than
significant.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
58
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale of the DSP, and would utilize the same construction methods as the previously-
analyzed project. The modified project is on the same site as that analyzed by the DSP EIR, and
the geological and geotechnical conditions present are identical to those previously analyzed. The
modified project would be subject to PDF-GEO-2 and PDF-GEO-4. In addition, PDF-GEO-1 is
incorporated into the project to provide guidance related to grading compliance and slope
stability.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that, with a connection to local wastewater service provided by the Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), there would be no impact related to the use of septic
systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
The modified project would connect to EVMWD wastewater service. No septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems are proposed. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur
with implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The
modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (no
impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding geology and soils.
There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
59
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-GEO-1.All earthwork and grading at the project site shall be performed in accordance with
all applicable building code requirements, the California Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (Cal/OSHA), and the Grading Code of the City of Lake Elsinore (Section 17.10.070
of the Zoning Code), and the recommendations outlined in the Preliminary Geologic and
Geotechnical Investigation. Slopes shall not be steeper than 2:1 unless approved by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments and considered safe in a slope stability report
prepared by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist.
PDF-GEO-2. [Ground shaking]The project shall implement recommendations outlined in the
Geotechnical Evaluation for the proposed project in accordance with the 2006 IBC and 2008 CBC
requirements for resistance to seismic shaking.
PDF-GEO-3. [Erosion]During construction, soil erosion shall be controlled and reduced to a less
than significant impact through the implementation of a project-specific Erosion Control Plan and a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the California State Water
Resources Control Board Order No. 92-08-DWQ, NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002. The
SWPPP shall comply with Best Available Technology (BAT) and Best Conventional Pollutant Control
Technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate soil erosion from areas of construction activity. For erosion
control purposes, slopes exceeding five feet in vertical height shall be hydromulched prior to final
acceptance and prior to the beginning for the rainy season (October-March).
PDF-GEO-4. [Grading]
All construction shall comply with the provisions of applicable building codes and other codes
or City ordinances related thereto.
All grading shall be in accordance with the standards of Chapter 15.72 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code and with Chapter 4 of the Specific Plan.
Prior to commencing any grading, including clearing and grubbing, a grading permit shall
be obtained from the City of Lake Elsinore. All grading shall be completed in accordance
with City standards.
All roadway, drainage, water, reclaimed water, and wastewater development shall be in
accordance with the requirements of Chapters 3 and 4 of the Specific Plan, subject to
modifications pursuant to the processes established in Chapter 6 of the Specific Plan.
Grading activities shall be in substantial compliance with the overall Conceptual Grading
Plan (Figure 2.3-11).
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained weed-free and planted with interim
landscaping such as hydroseed within one year (365 days) of completion of grading, unless
building permits are obtained. Temporary irrigation systems may be required.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe geology and soils impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required for geology and soils. No refinements related to the modified project are
necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
60
5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR determined that the development of the DSP would result in significant and unavoidable
impacts related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Buildout of all phases of the DSP was projected
to generated over 95,000 metric tons of CO2-equivalent (MTCO2e) emissions per year during
operations, which exceeded the interim significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e used by the City
of Lake Elsinore.
To reduce impacts associated with GHG emissions, the implementation of mitigation measures DSP-
AQ-3 through DSP-AQ-5 was required.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP, with operational impacts also similar to those of the previously analyzed
land uses. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of the approved
specific plan. Construction and operation of the modified project would be subject to mitigation
measures DSP-AQ-3 through DSP-AQ-5. In addition, PDF-AQ-1, incorporated into the project to
minimize air pollutant emissions, also contains various measures that would reduce GHG emissions.
The modified project would not result in a net increase in construction-period emissions compared
to the prior analysis. As shown in the Trip Generation Assessment (Appendix A), operation of the
modified project, when combined with the modifications to the DSP build-out associated with the
Sports Complex, would result in a significant decline of 11,213 daily vehicle trips, resulting in a
substantial reduction in GHG emissions as compared to that analyzed in the DSP EIR.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
61
No new impact would occur and the modified project would not require any changes to the certified
DSP EIR related to GHG emissions. The modified project would have the same level of impact
(significant and unavoidable) as that cited in the DSP EIR. As the project does not result in an increase
of GHG emissions over the prior analysis, there would be no potential for the project to conflict
with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-AQ-3.Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the applicant shall demonstrate that the following
measures to conserve energy have been incorporated into building design:
Submit plans demonstrating that the new residential buildings shall exceed 2009 California
Title 24 energy efficiency requirements.
Submit plans demonstrating that the new commercial buildings shall include the following
green building design features
-Utilize Low-E and ENERGY STAR windows where feasible
-Install high-efficiency lighting systems and incorporate advanced lighting controls,
such as auto shut-offs, timers, and motion sensors
-Install high R-value wall and ceiling insulation
Incorporate use of low pressure sodium and/or fluorescent lighting, where feasible
Require acquisition of new ENERGY STAR qualified appliances and equipment.
Implement passive solar design strategies in new construction. Examples of passive solar
strategies include orienting building to enhance sun access, designing narrow structures, and
incorporating skylights and atria
Where feasible and appropriate as determined by the City Engineer and building official,
structures shall be designed to support the added loads of rooftop solar systems and be
provided with appropriate utility connections for solar panels, even if installation of panels
is not planned during initial construction
DSP-AQ-4.Prior to issuance of a building permit(s), the applicant shall demonstrate that the
following water and energy conservation measures have been incorporated into the
landscape plan:
Participate in green waste collection and recycling programs for landscape maintenance
Require use of landscaping with low water requirements and fast growth.
Plant trees or vegetation to shade buildings and thus reduce heating/cooling demand
DSP-AQ-5. Once the City’s Climate Action Plan is adopted, the project shall adhere to the
guidelines, regulations, and requirements to reduce GHG emissions as stated in the plan.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding GHG emissions. There
have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
62
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to
significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could not have
been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-AQ-1.Refer to Section 5.3, above.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe GHG emissions impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures with respect to greenhouse gas emissions impacts are required. No refinements related
to the modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation
measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
63
5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working
in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
64
The DSP EIR identified the potential use of various hazardous materials, including fuels, lubricants,
cleaning solutions and solvents, and others, during construction and operation of DSP facilities. The
DSP EIR determined the application of existing federal, State, County, and municipal regulations
would reduce any potential for impacts to below a level of significance. PDF-HAZ-1 is incorporated
into the project to ensure these regulations are followed.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
type of development analyzed in the DSP EIR. The construction and operation of various commercial
uses on the project site was analyzed in the DSP EIR, and there are no new features that would
significantly expand the use of or increase the hazard associated with either the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials, or reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the nearest schools to the site to include an existing school (Canyon Academy)
0.5 mile from the DSP area, and a planned school 0.3 mile from the DSP area. The DSP EIR found
no impact associated with the risk of hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
type of development analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project does not increase the amount
of hazardous substances being handled or reduce the distance of such substances from nearby
schools. The modified project would not emit hazardous emissions or result in hazardous materials,
substances, or wastes being handled within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
65
The DSP EIR determined the DSP site was not located on any hazardous materials site designated
by Government Code Section 65962.5 and did not contain permitted aboveground storage tanks,
or underground storage tanks, or septic tanks. An underground sump, and aboveground diesel
storage vessel, and an abandoned cesspool were identified in the northern portion of the DSP,
outside the area of the modified project; these features were determined in the DSP EIR to not have
been associated with hazardous materials.
The DSP EIR notes that site visits were not conducted on a number of parcels within the DSP; to
mitigate the potential for hazardous materials to be uncovered on these parcels, mitigation
measures DSP-HAZ-1 and DSP-HAZ-2 were required.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project is located within an area that was fully analyzed for
hazardous materials impacts by the DSP EIR; it was concluded the area of the modified project did
not contain any identified hazardous materials sites.
DSP-HAZ-1 requires preparation of a Phase I ESA prior to approval of a site plan including
redevelopment on parcels 373-210-016, -019, -024, -027, -042, and 371-030-035. DSP-HAZ-2
requires preparation of a Phase I ESA prior to issuance of a grading permit on parcels 363-161-
012, -032, -033, -034, -035, -037, and 373-210-030. The parcels affected by these mitigation
measures are mapped on Figure 4.6-1 of the DSP EIR. The modified project is not located on any
of these parcels; therefore, neither mitigation measure applies to the modified project.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR. While the DSP EIR identified a less than significant impact with mitigation
incorporated for this impact area, the required mitigation only applies to selected parcels which
were not fully assessed as part of the DSP EIR. As the modified project is proposed on parcels that
were fully assessed, the modified project would result in a less than significant impact related to
being located on a hazardous materials site, and no mitigation is required.
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the nearest public airport as the Perris Valley Airport, 8.5 miles northeast of
the site, and determined that due to distance, the project would have a less than significant impact
on the airport.
The nearest private airstrip was identified to be Skylark Airfield, 1.7 miles southeast of the site.
The DSP area is not within the Airport Operation zones for this facility, and the DSP EIR determined
that the project would have a less than significant impact on the airstrip.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
66
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale of the DSP. Most structures on the site would be single story; one structure would be
two stories and the hotel would rise to four stories. The building heights are consistent with the 5-
story/60-foot height restriction of the DSP. There are no new project features that differ
significantly from those reviewed in the DSP EIR, which could create new impacts airports or airstrips.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
g) Impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the DSP would not have the potential to impair implementation of or
physically interfere with Lake Elsinore’s Emergency Operations Plan.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale of the DSP. The modified project does not involve modifying, closing, rerouting, or
otherwise impeding any emergency access or evacuation routes. The modified project would build
out roadways within the DSP to the size and design identified the DSP, which is consistent with the
City’s public works standards.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified a low to moderate risk of wildfires impacting the DSP area, with factors such
as existing urban development (to the north and east), proposed urban development (to the south),
and the presence of Lake Elsinore (to the west) reducing wildfire risks.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The project site is within the area evaluated by the DSP EIR, and contains no
unique features that would increase wildfire risk. Urban development has proceeded to the south
in the Summerly community, which has removed natural vegetation and replaced it with irrigated
landscapes that are not at significant risk of wildfire.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
67
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding hazards and
hazardous materials. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of
the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial
importance relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known
and could not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDF included in the DSP EIR is applicable to the modified project:
PDF-HAZ-1.Compliance with all standards is required through federal, state, county, and municipal
regulations, to reduce the potential for direct impacts to human health and biological resources from
accidental spills of small amounts of hazardous materials from construction equipment during
construction of the buildings, storage, and transport of these materials.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe hazards and hazardous materials impacts would
result from the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised
mitigation measures with respect to hazards and hazardous materials impacts are required. No
refinements related to the modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and
no new mitigation measures are required. Mitigation measures DSP-HAZ-1 and DSP-HAZ-2 are not
applicable to the area of the modified project, as described in the mitigation measures and
depicted in Figure 4.6-1 of the DSP EIR.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
68
5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j) Be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
69
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the potential for operational-period impacts to water quality due to the
addition of pollutants from urban runoff, such as motor oil and other fluids from cars; oil, paint, and
household cleaners; soap and dirt from car washing; litter; animal wastes; and other pollutants. As
a standard permitting requirement, the project would be required to implement a construction-
period SWPPP and an operational-period Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to ensure
compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The SWPPP and WQMP would
include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize water quality impacts. The DSP EIR
determined that build-out of the DSP under standard permitting requirements would result in a less-
than-significant impact related to a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent in form
and scale with that analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project’s construction- and operational-
period water quality impacts would not be greater than those previously analyzed. The modified
project will continue to be subject to standard permitting requirements, including implementation of
a SWPPP and WQMP. Standard permitting requirements are incorporated into the project through
PDF-HYD-3.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would
drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR notes that groundwater is a minimal water source for the local water purveyor,
EVMWD, and that the DSP would not use groundwater as its water supply. The DSP EIR further
notes that while implementation of the DSP would increase site imperviousness and therefore reduce
infiltration and groundwater recharge, such impacts are reduced through the inclusion of bioswales
and similar infiltration features that would be required in the WQMP. In addition, the project was
found to not significantly modify regional absorption and infiltration rates. For these reasons, the
DSP EIR concluded the project’s impacts on groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge would
be less than significant.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
70
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent in form
and scale with that analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project’s site plan is consistent with the
type of commercial development envisioned in the DSP, which included an increase in impervious
surface area on the site. The modified project would continue to rely on water sourced from EVMWD
and would not consume local groundwater. The modified project would continue to be subject to
standard permitting requirements, as implemented through a WQMP, that require on-site infiltration
of stormwater.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found that construction and operation of the DSP would have the potential to alter the
existing drainage pattern of the site. The DSP was designed with a storm drainage system that
would efficiently transport stormwater with minimal erosion or siltation on- or off-site. To minimize
impacts during construction, standard permitting requirements mandate the implementation of a
SWPPP with BMPs to reduce or eliminate erosion and sedimentation. With the implementation of a
SWPPP, the impacts related to erosion or siltation resulting from an alteration of the existing
drainage pattern of the site were found to be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent in form
and scale with that analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project’s site plan is consistent with the
type of commercial development envisioned in the DSP, and includes similar modifications to
drainage patterns. The DSP’s drainage plan contains three subareas; the modified project is located
within Subarea A, which would collect 69.1 acres of the project runoff through a backbone storm
drain system within area roadways. The modified project would build-out the applicable portions
of the storm drainage system on the project site in a manner that is consistent with the DSP, and
implementation of a SWPPP with BMPs would continue to be required on the site. The modified
project would not alter the course of a stream or river.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
71
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the DSP’s proposed backbone storm drain system, which would be
designed to have the capacity to accommodate the stormwater flow of a 100-year storm event,
would avoid an increase in the amount of surface runoff which could result in flooding.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.See response to Section 5.9(c), above. As the modified project is similar in design
to the prior analysis for the site and would build-out applicable portions of the DSP storm drainage
system, the modified project would not result in greater flooding impacts than the approved project.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Related to the capacity of stormwater drainage systems, see response to Section 5.9(c), above.
Related to runoff water quality, see response to Section 5.9(a), above.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.See responses to Sections 5.9(a) and (d), above. Development of the modified
project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with
implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The
modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less
than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
See response to Section 5.9(a), above. The DSP EIR concluded that impacts to water quality would
be less than significant with the implementation of standard permitting requirements, including a
SWPPP and WQMP.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.See response to Section 5.9(a), above. Development of the modified projectwould
not substantially degrade water quality. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with
implementation of the Modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The
modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less
than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
72
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found that, following the issuance of a Determination of Letter of Map Revision in
August 2007, only a small portion of the DSP, located along the western edge of the specific plan
area, is below the base flood elevation of 1,263.3 feet. In addition, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Section 15.68.010 requires all finished floor elevations within the proposed development to be at
or above 1,267 feet, 3.7 feet above the base flood elevation.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. Based on the August 2007 flood map revision, no portion of the modified project
would be within a 100-year flood hazard area. No housing is proposed as part of the modified
project. The modified project would therefore not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard
area, nor would it place structures within such an area that could impede or redirect flood flows.
To formally record the new elevation of the project site with the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, PDF-HYD-1 and PDF-HYD-2 are incorporated into the project to require processing of a
Letter of Map Revision and compliance with Army Corps regulations related to flooding at Lake
Elsinore.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found the DSP to be within a high inundation zone for the Railroad Canyon Dam,
located three miles from the site, which holds 12,000 acre-feet of water. The DSP EIR analyzed the
flood hazards associated with a failure of this dam and determined that in the worst-case scenario
of a dam failure when Lake Elsinore is at its highest level of 1,260 feet, the lake’s water surface
would rise to 1,263.4 feet, 3.6 feet below the minimum finished floor elevation of 1,267 feet
permitted for the DSP by Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 15.68.010.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. For a discussion of flooding impacts from storm events, see Section 5.9(g) and (h),
above. Related to flooding from the failure of a levee or dam, the modified project would comply
with the Municipal Code’s requirement for the finished floor to be at a minimum elevation of 1,267
feet. This would avoid a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving a catastrophic failure of
Railroad Canyon Dam.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
73
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
j) Be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR evaluated the potential for seiche impacts due to the DSP’s location adjacent to Lake
Elsinore. The DSP EIR concluded that due to the shallow water depths in the lake and with the
presence of flood control devices constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, seiche hazards
on the site are less than significant.
The DSP EIR identified no impact associated with tsunami due to the site’s inland location, and a
less-than-significant impact associated with mudflows due to the flat topography of the site, and
the degree of urban development within surrounding areas.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project is located within the DSP area that was previously analyzed
for seiche, tsunami, and mudflow hazards, and is therefore subject to the same degree of impact
as described in the prior analysis. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with
implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The
modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less
than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding hydrology and water
quality. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous
DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-HYD-1. [Hydrology]A Conditional Letter of Map Revision and Letter of Map Revision would
be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) specifying that the grading
of the Diamond Specific Plan should remove the site from within a FEMA 100-Year Flood Zone.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
74
PDF-HYD-2. [Flood storage]The Diamond Specific Plan is required to adhere to the existing Back
Basin United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit which requires a HEC-5 flood
storage analysis to ensure that the project does not affect the base flood elevation in the back
basin. The concept grading plan indicates that the flood storage volume provided at completion of
the project exceeds the minimum required to maintain the base flood elevation. At the local level,
the City would require certification by a registered professional engineer, prior to any import of
fill and/or construction, demonstrating that the cumulative effect of obstructions and/or imported
fill shall not result in any increase in the base flood elevation during the occurrence of the base
flood discharge [Ord. 1078 § 15.64.110, 2001] and submittal to FEMA of a Conditional Letter of
Map Revision based on Fill (CLOMR-F), Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) or Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
PDF-HYD-3. [Water quality]In accordance with Santa Ana Regional Drainage Area Management
Plan (SAR-DAMP) and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, an
applicant for a project encompassing more than five acres is required to develop and implement a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition, the City shall ensure that construction
activity is in compliance with the State’s General Permit for Construction Activities administered by
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), located in Riverside (Santa Ana,
Region 8). One condition of this permit is the development and implementation of a site-specific
SWPPP that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce/eliminate erosion and
sedimentation associated with construction.
The objective of the SWPPP is to identify and control storm water discharges due to construction
activity and to identify and implement structural (e.g., silt fences, sandbags, spill control) and non-
structural (e.g., scheduling) BMPs to reduce pollutants in storm water, both before and after
construction. Discharges associated with construction activity are covered under one statewide
General Permit. Coverage under the General Permit requires submittal of a Notice of Intent (NOI)
to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) prior to construction, and development and
implementation of a defensible SWPPP prior to disturbing a site and for the duration of construction.
All construction period non-storm and storm water BMPs shall adhere to the California Stormwater
Quality Association Stormwater Best Management Handbook for Construction.
A project-specific water quality plan has been developed to address storm water runoff
management and water quality treatment objectives and sets forth an integrated approach
involving the utilization of BMPs designed to: (1) function with the drainage plan for the project site
and offsite areas; and (2) to address treatment of urban and storm water runoff. The sizing of
treatment control BMPs for the proposed project is based upon a criteria established by the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the discharge of urban runoff.
The project site is located within the region covered by the Watershed-wide Waste Discharge
Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with New Development within the
San Jacinto Watershed (Order 01-34, NPDES CAG 618005). The order requires that all
development projects tributary to Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore obtain an NPDES permit, and
implement best available technology (BAT) that is economically achievable and best conventional
technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution, including the preparation of a
SWPPP.
The proposed project would feature on-site BMPs consisting of Extended Detention Basins (volume-
based) and Grassed Swales (flow-based) designed to address storm water runoff management
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
75
and water quality treatment objectives. The Water Quality Management Plan sets forth an
integrated approach to water quality involving the utilization of treatment control BMPs designed
to function with the drainage plan for the project site; and to address treatment of urban and storm
water runoff. Specifically, the following treatment BMPs would reduce storm water flow:
An extended detention basin, designed according to criteria set forth and defined by
Riverside County, should detain and slowly release the design volume of stormwater.
Two grassed swales constructed according to County criteria should receive and slow
nuisance flows and first flush flows from each of the drainage areas.
An infiltration basin shall allow storm water runoff to gradually replete the groundwater
basin.
Permeable area of the project should be maximized.
Landscaped buffer areas should be incorporated between sidewalks and streets.
Onsite ponding areas and retention facilities should increase opportunities for infiltration.
Streets, sidewalks, and parking aisles should be constructed to the minimum widths
necessary, provided the walkable environment and pedestrians’ public safety is not
compromised.
Where off-street parking is available, street widths should be reduced.
The use of impervious surfaces should be minimized in the landscape design.
Where landscaping is proposed in parking areas, landscaping should be incorporated into
the drainage design.
Water quality education should be given to property owners, operators, tenants, occupants,
and employees.
Activity restrictions shall be in place to control water pollution sources.
Irrigation systems and landscaping should have appropriate maintenance.
Common area litter control shall be in place.
Street sweeping of private streets and parking lots shall occur.
Maintenance of the above-listed BMPs is expected to be financed through a community facilities
district, home owners association, or other similar organizations. The proposed system of on-site
water quality and infiltration basins and swales would provide appropriate levels of treatment for
all on-site generated flows.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe hydrology and water quality impacts would result
from the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised
mitigation measures are required for hydrology and water quality. No refinements related to the
modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures
are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
76
5.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the buildout of the DSP would not cause the physical dividing of any
established community. The impact was considered less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is located within the DSP area that was analyzed in the DSP
EIR for impacts to established communities. The modified project would not expand the area of
impact. The modified project does not impact the roadway system; connectivity between uses would
remain as evaluated in the DSP EIR. No design element of the modified project would result in an
established community being physical divided.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in the DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
77
Table 4.8-6 of the DSP EIR contains a consistency analysis of the DSP with applicable land use
plans, policies, and regulations, including the Lake Elsinore General Plan, Lake Elsinore Zoning Code,
East Lake Specific Plan, Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Plan Project Areas II and III, Riverside County
Integrated Project, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional
Transportation Plan, and the SCAG Compass Blueprint. The DSP was found to be consistent with all
applicable plans, policies, and regulations.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is a build-out of the approved DSP, and is consistent with
the development standards and design guidelines of the approved plan. The modified project
implements the applicable elements of the DSP’s backbone infrastructure consistent with the
approved plan. To ensure build-out of the modified project remains consistent with the General
Plan, PDF-LU-1 is incorporated into the project. For these reasons, there would not be any new
inconsistency with applicable plans, policies, or regulations resulting from the modified project.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the Modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The Modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the DSP as being within the Elsinore Area Plan of the Western Riverside
County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). As detailed in Section 4.3 of the DSP
EIR, the DSP was found to be consistent with the MSHCP.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is wholly contained within a site analyzed for compliance
with the MSHCP. The project’s form, scale, and impacts to vegetation are consistent with those
analyzed in the DSP EIR. The project does not contain new features previously not analyzed that
could result in non-compliance with the MSHCP.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding land use and planning.
There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
78
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDF included in the DSP EIR is applicable to the modified project:
PDF-LU-1.The proposed project should implement design guidelines and policies which implement
the goals of the Ballpark District and the Community Design Element. The design guidelines outlined
in the Specific Plan are intended to create a landmark for the City and enhance the community
character surrounding the Diamond Stadium. The project includes design guidelines and
development standards in compliance with the current General Plan (1990) and General Plan
Update (2009) to increase the visibility and development potential for the site.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe land use and planning impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required regarding land use and planning. No refinements related to the modified
project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are
required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
79
5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan?
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on the general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The Initial Study to the DSP EIR concluded that the DSP did not have any known mineral resources
that may be of value to the region or State, and that the project site was not designated as a
locally important mineral resource recovery site by any plan.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project is located within the area of analysis of the DSP EIR. No
additional impacts associated with mineral resources would result from implementation of the
modified project. The modified project would have no impact on mineral resources.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding mineral resources.
There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
80
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The DSP EIR did not include any PDFs applicable to mineral resources.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe mineral resources impacts would result from the
adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required regarding mineral resources. No refinements related to the modified project
are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
81
5.12 NOISE Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in
the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the potential for construction-period noise impacts from later stages of DSP
development to have a significant short-term impact on residences developed in the earlier stages
of the DSP. In addition to the application of standard requirements of the Lake Elsinore Noise
Ordinance, Section 17.78.080 of the Municipal Code, the implementation of mitigation measures
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
82
DSP-NSE-1 and DSP-NSE-2 was required to reduce construction-period noise impacts to below a
level of significance.
The DSP EIR identified potential significant operational-period noise impacts at residential land uses
within the DSP due to increased traffic on roadways within the DSP area. The analysis showed that
all roadway segments that would exhibit a potentially significant noise impact (defined as an
increase in noise levels of greater than 3 dBA, with the resulting noise level exceeding the General
Plan Noise Element 65 dBA Ldn exterior noise threshold) would occur within the DSP; no off-site
streets would experience a significant operational-period noise impact.
The DSP EIR also identified the potential for operational-period noise impacts resulting from
incompatibilities between commercial and residential uses in mixed-use areas. Noises common in
commercial settings, such as alarms, truck deliveries, and maintenance services, may pose a
disturbance to residential land uses.
To reduce operational noise impacts, the DSP EIR required residential development to implement
mitigation measures DSP-NSE-3 through DSP-NSE-6.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes construction of a similar scale, form, and type as
that analyzed in the DSP. The construction process of the modified project is consistent with that of
the approved specific plan. To date, no residential land uses have been developed within the DSP,
and no residential or mixed-use projects with a residential component have been proposed for the
DSP. Nonetheless, to avoid any potential for future residential development to be impacted by the
constructionof the project, the modified project would be required to implement mitigation measures
DSP-NSE-1 and DSP-NSE-2.
Operations of the modified project would be similar to those analyzed in the DSP. The DSP assumed
commercial land uses on the site of the modified project. The trip generation analysis included in
Section 5.16, below, shows the project would not generate a greater number of trips than previously
analyzed, and would therefore not result in any significant increase in traffic noise.
Mitigation measures DSP-NSE-3 through DSP-NSE-6 were required in the DSP EIR to minimize
operational-period noise impacts to residential land uses. These measures are applicable only to
residential development, as described below:
DSP-NSE-3 requires residential development to submit site plans showing required noise
attenuation to reduce interior and exterior noise levels to standards identified in the General
Plan.
DSP-NSE-4 requires submission of an acoustical study for residential development prior to
building permit issuance to ensure interior and exterior living area noise levels meet
applicable standards.
DSP-NSE-5 requires residential uses incorporate appropriate buffering or sound attenuation
to limit potential incompatibilities with the animal hospital.
DSP-NSE-6 requires residential development along the eastern edge of the DSP (that is,
within the area of the modified project) incorporate appropriate buffering or sound
attenuation to ensure noise from the Lake Elsinore Town Center does not exceed interior and
exterior noise standards at residences.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
83
The modified project does not include any residential component; the one proposed live-work unit
would function as a commercial support space, for occasional use by the property owner or
manager, and would not be a permanent residence. Therefore, these mitigation measures do not
apply to the modified project.
PDF-NSE-1 is incorporated into the project to provide a performance standard that would minimize
vibration impacts. PDF-NSE-2 is incorporated into the project to require conformance with the Noise
Ordinance.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR. While the DSP EIR identified a less than significant impact with mitigation
incorporated for both construction- and operational-period impacts, only construction-period
mitigations are required for the modified project; operational-period mitigations are not
applicable as no residential component is included in the modified project. As the modified project
is proposed on parcels that were fully assessed, the modified project would result in a less than
significant impact related to being located on a hazardous materials site, and no mitigation is
required.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation incorporated)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-NSE-1.All construction equipment shall use properly operating mufflers.
DSP-NSE-2.All stationary noise generating construction equipment shall be located as far as
practical from existing residences. If impulsive noise generation such as pile driving or jackhammers
is necessary close to noise-sensitive users, activity scheduling to minimize offsite impacts, or erection
of temporary barriers, shall be necessary.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Refer to Section 5.7e) and f). The DSP EIR identified no airports or airstrips in the immediate vicinity
of the site. The nearest airport is Perris Valley Airport, 8.5 miles to the northeast, and the nearest
private airstrip is Skylark Airfield, 1.7 miles to the southeast.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
84
The modified project is located within an area that was analyzed for airport and airstrip noise as
part of the DSP EIR. The modified project does not include development within a closer proximity
to an airport or airstrip than previously analyzed, nor does it include noise-sensitive land uses that
were not previously contemplated for the site.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant with mitigation incorporated)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding noise. There have not
been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to
significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could not have
been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-NSE-1.No use, activity or process shall produce continual vibrations or noxious odors that are
perceptible without instruments by the average person at the property lines of the site or within the
interior of residential units on the site.
PDF-NSE-2. [City of Lake Elsinore Noise Ordinance]According to the City of Lake Elsinore Noise
Ordinance, the maximum exterior noise levels not to be exceeded for more than 30 minutes from
stationary or commercial facility related noises to multi-family residential land uses are 45 dBA
from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 50 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. For general commercial land uses, the
exterior noise levels cannot exceed 60 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 65 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10
p.m.
For interior noise levels, the maximum interior noise levels for all residential uses are 35 dBA from
10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and 40 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and shall not be exceeded for more than five
minutes in any hour.
Additionally, the City of Lake Elsinore standards for stationary source noise impacts limits operation
of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work
between the weekday hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. and during weekends or holidays.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
85
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe noise impacts would result from the adoption and
implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures with
respect to noise impacts are required. No refinements related to the modified project are necessary
to the DSP EIR mitigation measures.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
86
5.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR determined that the addition of 600 multifamily residential units within the DSP,
amounting to approximately 1,620 new residents or a number equivalent to 3 percent of Lake
Elsinore’s population, would not be considered a substantial population increase.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project includes no residential component beyond one live-work unit.
The commercial component is consistent with the development previously analyzed on the site, and
would not be expected to induce population growth beyond the amounts previously analyzed. No
new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project when
compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that no displacement of existing housing would occur, as no housing was
present within the DSP.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
87
No New Impact. The site affected by the modified project is vacant; therefore, development would
not displace any housing. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation
of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is
consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that no displacement of substantial numbers of people would occur, as no
housing was present within the DSP.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The site affected by the modified project is vacant and unoccupied; therefore,
development would not displace any residents. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur
with implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The
modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less
than significant impact) remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding population and
housing. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous
DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The DSP EIR did not include any PDFs applicable to population and housing.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe population and housing impacts would result from
the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required for population and housing. No refinements related to the modified project
are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
88
5.14 PUBLIC SERVICES Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
a) Fire Protection
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Based on communications with the Riverside County Fire Department, the DSP EIR determined no
additional staffing or facilities were required to service the build-out of the DSP. The DSP EIR further
concluded that with the application of standard code and ordinance requirements and payment of
impact fees to the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2015-1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, and
Paramedic Services),6 impacts related to fire protection would be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is located within the same area analyzed in the DSP EIR,
and contains buildings of approximately the same size, scale, and form as previously analyzed.
The modified project would increase demand for fire services similar to demand already
anticipated for the project site under the approved development intensity. Contribution to the City’s
CFD No. 2015-1 to reduce potential impacts on fire services would only be required by properties
that contain a majority of residential development pursuant to CFD No. 2015-1, Appendix A,
Section E. Exemptions. The modified project does not include a majority of residential development
as was identified in the previous environmental analysis; thus, payment of CFD No. 2015-1 fees
would not be required to reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Because the modified
project would be consistent with the provisions of CFD No. 2015-1 and because the proposed
development is consistent with the development intensity already approved for the project site,
potential impacts would remain less than significant and no substantial change from the previous
analysis would occur. In addition, the modified project would contribute funding to offset increased
demand on fire services through commercial sales taxes, property taxes, and payment of standard
development impact fees.
6 Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 replaced CFD No. 2003-1 described in the DSP EIR, and serves the same
function for funding law enforcement, fire and paramedic services for residential development.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
89
The modified project would continue to be subject to standard code and ordinance requirements.
These standard requirements are incorporated into the project through PDF-PS-1.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) would be reduced from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Police Protection
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Based on communications with the Lake Elsinore Police Department, the DSP EIR determined that
one additional officer would be required to service the additional population generated by the
DSP. With the required payment of impact fees to CFD No. 2015-1, impacts related to police
protection would be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is located within the same area analyzed in the DSP EIR,
and contains buildings of approximately the same size, scale, and form as previously analyzed.
The modified project would not increase the total number of residences within the DSP, and would
therefore not affect the City’s target ratio of police officers to residents.
The modified project would increase demand for police services similar to demand already
anticipated for the project site under the approved development intensity. Contribution to the City’s
CFD No. 2015-1 to reduce potential impacts on fire services would only be required by properties
that contain a majority of residential development pursuant to CFD No. 2015-1, Appendix A,
Section E. Exemptions. The modified project does not include a majority of residential development
as was identified in the previous environmental analysis; thus, payment of CFD No. 2015-1 fees
would not be required to reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Because the modified
project would be consistent with the provisions of CFD No. 2015-1 and because the proposed
development is consistent with the development intensity already approved for the project site,
potential impacts would remain less than significant and no substantial change from the previous
analysis would occur. In addition, the modified project would contribute funding to offset increased
demand on police services through commercial sales taxes, property taxes, and payment of
standard development impact fees.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) would be reduced from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
c) School Services
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR calculated the DSP would generate 401 new students for the Lake Elsinore Unified
School District. The additional students would cause Railroad Canyon Elementary School to exceed
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
90
its capacity; Elsinore Middle School and Elsinore High School would continue to operate with excess
capacity following build-out of the DSP. It was determined that the impact to Railroad Canyon
Elementary School would be fully mitigated through the payment of school fees in compliance with
Senate Bill 50 of 1998.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project is a commercial center and would not generate any school-
aged children or any demand for school services. There would be no impact on school facilities.
Furthermore, the project applicant will be required to pay school impact fees. This standard
requirement is incorporated into the project through PDF-PS-2. Therefore, no new significant impacts
are anticipated.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) would be reduced from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Parks
Parks are addressed in Section 5.15, below.
e) Other Public Facilities
Public and private utilities and service systems, including water, wastewater, and solid waste
services and systems, are addressed in Section 5.17, below.
Library Services
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
Based on communications with Riverside County Libraries, the DSP EIR concluded local libraries have
adequate capacity and facilities to service the local population, including the resident population
that would be added by the DSP. Residential development within the DSP would be subject to the
Riverside County Uniform Mitigation Fee to fund library facility development and material
purchases.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
The modified project would not increase the total resident population of the DSP, and would
therefore have no impact on libraries. No library mitigation fee payment is required by the County
of Riverside for non-residential development. The DSP EIR included a PDF requiring residential
development to pay library impact fees; as the modified project contains no residential component,
this PDF is not applicable. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation
of the modified project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is
consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact)
would be reduced from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
91
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding public services. There
have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to
significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could not have
been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-PS-1. [Fire]
During construction and operation of the proposed project, compliance with all applicable
fire code and ordinance requirements would be required and conditioned to the proposed
project. The project would comply with the 2009 International Fire Code, California Building
Code, and applicable Riverside County Fire Department Code requirements and standards
for construction, access, water mains, fire flow, and fire hydrants.
All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in
accordance with the appropriate sections of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or
No. 787, subject to review and approval by the Riverside County Fire Department.
Fire flow requirements within commercial projects are based on square footage and type
of construction of the structures. The minimum fire flow for any commercial structure is 1,500
gallons per minute, at a residual operating pressure of 20-psi, and can rise to 8,000 gallons
per minute, (per Table A-III of the California Fire Code).
PDF-PS-2. [Schools]The proposed project would be required to pay applicable development fees
levied by Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) pursuant to the School Facilities Act (Senate
Bill [SB] 50, Stats. 1998, c.407) to offset these impacts on school facilities resulting from new
development.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe public services impacts would result from the adoption
and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are
required for public services. No refinements related to the modified project are necessary to the
DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
92
5.15 RECREATION Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated?
b) Require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR calculated the DSP’s proposed residential population of 1,620 residents would require
8.1 acres of parkland at the City’s established park ratio of five acres per 1,000 residents. The
DSP provides 6.8 acres of open space on-site; the requirement for the remaining 1.3 acres of
parkland would be met through the payment of impact fees under the Quimby Act. With the
provision of on-site parkland and/or the payment of impact fees, impacts to parks were found to
be less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is a commercial center and would not generate demand for
additional recreational facilities, including neighborhood and regional parks. The one live-work unit
proposed as part of the modified project would be subject to payment of impact fees for parkland.
The payment of applicable parks fees is required by PDF-REC-1. No new or substantially greater
impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project when compared to those identified
in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level
of impact (less than significant impact) is reduced from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding recreation. There have
not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
93
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to the involvement
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to
significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could not have
been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDF included in the DSP EIR is applicable to the modified project:
PDF-REC-1. Pursuant to City standards, five acres of park area are to be dedicated for each 1,000
subdivision residents, cash in-lieu fees, or a combination of both, as a condition of residential
development approval.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe recreation impacts would result from the adoption
and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are
required for recreation. No refinements related to the modified project are necessary to the DSP
EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
94
5.16 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of
the circulation system, taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel
and relevant components of the circulation system, including but
not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel
demand measures, or other standards established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness
for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components
of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to
level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by
the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR included a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that documented the following information: (1)
existing (2009) conditions in the vicinity of the project site; (2) evaluation of existing plus ambient
growth plus project (EAP) (2012, 2014 & 2016), existing plus ambient growth plus project plus
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
95
cumulative developments (EAPC) (2012, 2014 & 2016) and General Plan buildout with project
conditions; (3) determination of intersection improvements for EAP (2012, 2014 & 2016), EAPC
(2012, 2014 & 2016) and General Plan buildout with project conditions to mitigate significant
project impacts to achieve City of Lake Elsinore level of service requirements; and (4) evaluation of
PM peak hour operations assuming buildout of the proposed project in conjunction with event traffic
generated by Diamond Stadium. A total of 30 intersections were analyzed in the TIA. The DSP EIR
concluded that 21 intersections would require improvements by General Plan buildout.
To minimize construction-period impacts, the DSP EIR included mitigation measure DSP-TR-1. To
minimize long-term impacts, mitigation measure DSP-TR-2 was required. This mitigation measure
requires payment of impact fees and fair-share payments for the intersections impacted by the
project, which are listed in Table 4.13-13 of the DSP EIR.
The DSP EIR identified no other conflicts between the build-out of the DSP and applicable plans,
ordinances, and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the
circulation system, including the congestion management program.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. With the approval of the DSP and its inclusion in the City’s General Plan, the DSP
Circulation Plan becomes the guiding document for transportation improvements within the DSP. The
project is a build-out of the DSP, and does not modify any of its major transportation elements. The
nearest congestion management program roadway is I-15, which is not affected by the project.
A Trip Generation Assessment (TGA) was prepared by Urban Crossroads to analyze the impacts
of the modified project combined with the adjacent Sports Complex project compared with the
prior analysis in the DSP EIR. Table 5.16-1, below, summarizes the results of this TGA; refer to
Appendix A for the complete analysis. It is noted that the Sports Complex project of 600,000
square feet was analyzed in the TGA; this results in a conservative over-estimate of trip generation
compared to final design of the facility, which contains only 520,000 square feet of built space.
Table 5.16-1. Trip Generation –Approved Project vs. Modified Project and Sports Complex
Land Use Approved Project DSP with Modified Project and Sports
Complex
AM Peak
Hour Total
PM Peak
Hour Total
Daily Total AM Peak
Hour Total
PM Peak
Hour Total
Daily Total
Phase 1
Condo/Townhouse 44 52 581 ------
General Office 138 122 816 ------
Shopping Center 58 266 2,753 ------
Sports Complex ------16 157 1,537
Phase 1 Total 240 440 4,150 16 157 1,537
Phase 2
Condo/Townhouse 176 208 2,325 176 208 2,325
General Office 295 250 1,849 141 125 904
Shopping Center 244 1,119 11,601 23 102 1,066
Hotel 84 42 1,226 84 89 1,226
Phase 2 Total 799 1,666 17,001 424 524 5,521
Phase 3
Condo/Townhouse 44 52 581 0 1 6
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
96
Table 5.16-1. Trip Generation –Approved Project vs. Modified Project and Sports Complex
Land Use Approved Project DSP with Modified Project and Sports
Complex
AM Peak
Hour Total
PM Peak
Hour Total
Daily Total AM Peak
Hour Total
PM Peak
Hour Total
Daily Total
General Office 152 134 928 25 20 156
Shopping Center 63 292 3,029 129 598 6,194
Hotel ------73 77 1,062
Phase 3 Total 259 478 4,538 210 677 7,418
Total 3 Phases 1,298 2,584 25,689 650 1,358 14,476
Variance between Approved Project and DSP with Modified Project + Sports Complex
Approved Project DSP with Modified Project +
Sports Complex
Difference % Change
AM Peak Hour 1,298 667 (631)(49%)
PM Peak Hour 2,584 1,377 (1,207)(47%)
Daily Total 25,689 14,476 (11,213)(44%)
As shown in the table above, the modified project combined with the Sports Complex would result
in total traffic compared to the levels analyzed in the DSP EIR declining in the AM peak hour by 49
percent, in the PM peak hour by 47 percent, and for the daily total by 44 percent.
With the significant reduction in trip generation described above, the modified project would not
result in any increase in traffic or reduction in levels of service beyond that previously analyzed in
the DSP EIR. To minimize construction-period traffic impacts, the implementation of mitigation
measure DSP-TR-1 will continue to be required. To minimize long-term traffic impacts, the
implementation of mitigation measure DSP-TR-2 will continue to be required. The payment of
countywide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees is incorporated into the project as PDF-TR-2.
Due to the delay in the initiation of development activities within the DSP, the timeframe for
implementation of the intersection mitigations in DSP EIR Table 4.13-13 will similarly be delayed
on a year-for-year basis, or as otherwise determined by the City Engineer, with initial development
at the DSP to occur no earlier than 2017.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact with mitigation
incorporated) is consistent with that cited in the DSP EIR.
Applicable Mitigation Measures Adopted by the DSP EIR
DSP-TR-1.Prior to the start of construction of each phase of the Diamond Specific Plan, the
Applicant shall implement the following measures documented in a construction management plan
to be approved by the City Engineer:
Control for any street closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation;
Routes that construction vehicles will utilize to access the site;
Hours of construction traffic (not to occur during AM or PM peak hour);
Off-site vehicles staging and parking areas,
Proposed construction staging plan for the project,
Posted information for contact in case of emergency or complaint; and
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
97
Hours of construction and traffic control during construction shall not interfere with
ingress/egress to and from the Lake Elsinore Storm Baseball Stadium during the baseball
season.
DSP-TR-2.The project shall participate in the phased construction of the off-site intersection
improvements shown in Table 4.13-13 through payment of City of Lake Elsinore fees, and
participation in the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF)
program. Where required improvements are not covered by these programs, mitigation shall be
implemented through a fair-share contribution or as otherwise determined by the City Engineer. The
improvements listed in Table 4.13-13 shall be in place prior to issuance of the first building permit
for each phase unless a new traffic study is submitted and approved by the City’s Traffic Engineer
documenting that the intersection improvement is no longer needed to maintain LOS D or better.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified no potential for impacts to air traffic patterns.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent with the
form and scale of the DSP. Most structures on the site would be single story; the hotel would rise to
four stories. The building heights are consistent with the 5-story/60-foot height restriction of the
DSP. There are no new project features that differ significantly from those reviewed in the DSP EIR
that could cause a change in air traffic patterns.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified no hazardous design features or incompatible uses associated with build-out
of the project, nor did it identify inadequate emergency access to the Specific Plan area. The DSP
EIR noted that in the existing condition Diamond Stadium periodically impacts nearby intersections
as a result of heavy inbound traffic flows that occur in a short time span for special events. These
impacts are typically short in duration, do not occur on a daily basis, and may not occur at the same
intensity over time. In lieu of capacity enhancements to correct unacceptable LOS of temporary and
irregular traffic flows, it was determined the City and stadium would continue manual traffic control
measures during times of high stadium traffic. With the continuation of manual traffic controls
already in place, a less than significant impact is identified related to hazardous design features
or incompatible uses.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
98
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The modified project would not include any new design features that could be
hazardous, or introduce uses that would be incompatible with existing uses or planned uses in the
DSP. The modified project utilizes the same backbone circulation infrastructure as evaluated in the
DSP EIR, and on-site facilities would be designed to meet City and Fire Department standards, as
evaluated through the building permit process. The proposed commercial and hotel uses on the site
are consistent with the uses previously analyzed for the DSP. The site plan provides multiple access
points for emergency services, and would not impede access on existing adjacent roadways,
including Diamond Drive and Malaga Road.
The requirement to design site access and circulation to City standards is incorporated into the
project by PDF-TR-3. Sight distance standards for the purpose of enhancing safety and ensuring
emergency access are incorporated into the project by PDF-TR-5.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified no conflicts between the build-out of the DSP with adopted policies, plans,
or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, nor did it identify a decrease
in the performance or safety of such facilities resulting from DSP build-out.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. The DSP, as a component of the General Plan, is the guiding plan for public transit,
bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the DSP. The modified project would not modify the backbone
circulation infrastructure included in the DSP and analyzed in the DSP EIR. This includes Class II
bikeways and sidewalks adjacent to the project site on Diamond Drive and Malaga Road, a
potential bus stop location on Diamond Drive, and on-site walkways within the project site connecting
various uses. The modified project would not impede completion of the Lake Elsinore Regional Trail
or other community trails envisioned in the DSP.
To ensure the modified project is developed to incorporate public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities as required by the DSP, PDF-TR-4 is incorporated into the project.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
99
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding transportation and
traffic. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous
DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-TR-2. [Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee]The Western Riverside Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program evolved from the need to establish a comprehensive funding source
for regional arterial highway improvements for western Riverside County. This program (adopted
December 2002) establishes a single uniform mitigation fee to mitigate the cumulative regional
impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system. It was adopted with the
intention to avoid multiple, discrete fee programs with varying policies, fees, and improvement
projects. The project proponent would contribute the required amount per dwelling unit TUMF for
funding regional transportation improvements.
PDF-TR-3. [Site Access and Circulation]Roadway classifications within the project site have been
designed in accordance with the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. The City’s General Plan
Circulation Element designates specific design criteria for street improvements. Implementation of
the design criteria assures that all street improvements are safely designed. The proposed project
would comply with all specified design criteria.
PDF-TR-4. [Alternative Transportation Modes]The Riverside Transit Agency currently provides bus
service along Lakeshore Drive and Mission Trail with stops near the Diamond Specific Plan at
Railroad Canyon Road and Malaga Road. In order to provide public transit service to the residents
and visitors of the Diamond area, the Specific Plan shall incorporate “transit ready” features in
order to accommodate public transit service once it becomes available. Potential public transit stop
locations are included in the Circulation Plan. Bus stops/turnouts would be developed according to
RTA standards.
The project should provide interconnections of land uses that are considerate of pedestrians,
bicyclists, public transit riders and motorists. A pedestrian and cyclist network should connect the
different planning areas within the Specific Plan area. The project area shall be connected to land
uses north and south of it by the Regional Trail and the Community Trail.
PDF-TR-5. [Emergency Access]Sight distance at each project access should be reviewed with
respect to standard California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore sight distance
standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
100
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe transportation and traffic impacts would result from
the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required for transportation and traffic. No refinements related to the modified project
are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
101
5.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Would the project:Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR notes the wastewater service provider for the project site is EVMWD. The site is in the
service area of the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility (WRF), which was operating at less
than 60 percent of capacity. The DSP EIR concluded that with adherence to the RWQCB’s NPDES
permit for the Regional WRF, the DSP would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements
for the Santa Ana RWQCB.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
The modified project proposes commercial development that is consistent in size with the DSP, and
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
102
is within the project area that was analyzed in the DSP EIR. There are no new project features that
differ significantly from those reviewed in the DSP EIR, which could create new impacts related to
wastewater treatment. PDF-UTL-3 is incorporated into the project to ensure compliance with City
and EVMWD requirements for wastewater service. The modified project, like the remainder of the
DSP, would be serviced by the Regional WRF.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR determined that the DSP’s water and wastewater infrastructure plans would be
adequate to service the project, and that adherence to City and EVMWD regulations would ensure
that less than significant impacts would result from the installation of water lines and utility
improvements required to serve water to the proposed project. Per EVMWD, adequate capacity
exists to serve the projected increase in wastewater service due to implementation of the DSP.
Sewer-related infrastructure would be designed and installed in accordance with the requirements
and specifications of the City, EVMWD, Riverside County Department of Health, and RWQCB.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project includes development of a similar scope and scale as
analyzed in the DSP EIR. The DSP’s overall water use and wastewater generation will be similar to
that which was previously analyzed. The modified project would include build-out of applicable
components of the DSP’s infrastructure plans in order to service the new development. PDF-UTL-2
and PDF-UTL-3 are incorporated into the project to ensure compliance with City and EVMWD
requirements for water and wastewater service, respectively.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant) remains unchanged from that
cited in the DSP EIR.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that the infrastructure plans for storm drainage improvements would
adequately service the project, and that construction of on- and off-site storm drains to the
requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District would result in less-than-significant impacts.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
103
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.In accordance with WQMP requirements, the modified project would incorporate
various on-site means, such as bioswales, to reduce stormwater flows. Excess stormwater would be
released to the backbone storm drain system evaluated in the DSP EIR. The modified project would
not require substantial adjacent to the previously analyzed storm drain system. Through compliance
with current stormwater regulations, off-site flows would be reduced from the levels previously
evaluated in the DSP EIR.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the impacts
identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains unchanged from
that cited in the DSP EIR.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR included a Water Supply Assessment which evaluated the adequacy of water supplies
for the DSP. The DSP EIR concluded, based on this analysis, that the scope of development within
the DSP would be adequately served by existing entitlements from the EVMWD.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project is similar in scope and use to that of the previously analyzed
project. Water use for the modified project would likely be reduced from the levels projected in
the WSA due to new statewide water efficiency regulations which took effect following the
preparation of the DSP EIR. Based on these factors, there would be less-than-significant impacts
associated with the availability of sufficient water supplies for the modified project.
Therefore, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified
project when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR. The modified project is consistent with the
impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact) remains
unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing commitments?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
See discussion in Section 5.17(a) and (b).
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.See discussion in Section 5.17(a) and (b).
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s
solid waste disposal needs?
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
104
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified the local solid waste disposal site as the El Sobrante Landfill, which is
permitted to receive 10,000 tons per day of waste. The DSP was calculated to generate 16 tons
per day, an amount which would be adequately served by the existing landfill capacity.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.The modified project, in conjunction with the Sports Complex, would result in the
following adjustments to development within the DSP: a decrease of 120,000 square feet of
commercial space (including shopping center, office, and sports uses); a decrease of 374 residential
units; and an increase of 130 hotel rooms.
Using the solid waste generation factors in the DSP EIR, solid waste generation from the modified
project combined with the Sports Complex would total 13 tons per day, based on the generation
of 4,764 tons per year calculated in Table 5.17-1, below.
Table 5.17-1.Solid Waste Generation –Modified Project and Sports Complex
Land Use Persons/Square Footage Generation Factor (per
DSP EIR)
Solid Waste Generated
(tons/year)
Residential 610 persons 0.0061 tons/person/day 1,359
Commercial 777,000 SF 0.0024 tons/SF/year 1,865
Hotel 280 rooms 4 pounds/room/day 204
Total 3,428
The modified project, combined with the Sports Complex, would therefore generate 41 percent less
solid waste than analyzed in the DSP EIR. The modified project would be adequately served by El
Sobrante Landfill.
The El Sobrante Landfill is required to comply with existing landfill regulations from federal, state,
and local regulatory agencies. They are subject to regular inspections by CalRecycle, the Local
Enforcement Agency (RWQCB), and the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
The modified project would be required to comply with the waste diversion requirements of AB
939, and with the construction and demolition waste recycling requirements of Chapter 14.12 of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PDF-UTL-4 is incorporated into the project to ensure compliance
with construction waste recycling requirements.
No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the modified project
when compared to those identified in the DSP EIR related to solid waste. The modified project is
consistent with the impacts identified in DSP EIR and the level of impact (less than significant impact)
remains unchanged from that cited in the DSP EIR.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that
would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental
document to evaluate project impacts or mitigation measures exist regarding utilities and service
systems. There have not been 1) changes to the project that require major revisions of the previous
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
105
DSP EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous DSP EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of substantial importance
relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives that were not known and could
not have been known when the DSP EIR was certified as completed.
Project Design Features
The following PDFs included in the DSP EIR are applicable to the modified project:
PDF-UTL-1.All utilities, except electrical lines over 12 kilovolts (kV), shall be placed underground.
PDF-UTL-2. [Water] Water lines and connections would be installed in accordance with the
requirements and specifications of the City and EVMWD. In addition, assurance of the provision of
adequate water service is required to be provided prior to the approval of a subdivision map
and/or plot plan for new residential development of 500 homes or more, in accordance with Senate
Bill (SB) 221. The proposed water system shall be designated to minimize the requirements of future
system maintenance.
A reclaimed water system should be constructed to provide for landscape irrigation and other non-
potable uses, unless the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) determines that
reclaimed water meeting heath standards is not currently available and will not be available to
the project site in the foreseeable future.
Development within The Diamond Specific Plan should comply with:
Title 20, California Code of Regulations Section 1604 (f) (Appliance Efficiency Standards),
which establishes efficiency standards for all new showerheads and lavatory faucets; and
Health and Safety Code Section 17621.3, which requires low-flow toilets and urinals in
virtually all buildings.
PDF-UTL-3. [Wastewater] All wastewater lines and disposal facilities should be designed and
constructed per City of Lake Elsinore and EVMWD requirements.
The proposed wastewater system shall be designed to adequately accommodate anticipated waste
flows resulting from the project.
Sewer-related infrastructure should be designed and installed in accordance with the requirements
and specifications of the City, EVMWD, Riverside County Department of Health, and RWQCB.
PDF-UTL-4. [Solid waste] A construction waste recycling program should be established with a
local waste management company to maximize waste recycling and to reach the 50 percent
diversion goals.
The proposed project should comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and
regulation related to solid waste, including the County’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
106
(SRRE), Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE), and City Ordinance 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code regarding construction debris removal.
PDF-UTL-5. [Gas] Gas-related infrastructure and necessary extensions would be installed in
accordance with the requirements and specifications of the City and the California Public Utilities
Commission.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more severe utilities and service systems impacts would result from
the adoption and implementation of the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation
measures are required regarding utilities and service systems. No refinements related to the
modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures
are required.
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
107
5.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Addendum to EIR
Substantial
Change in
Project or
Circumstances
Resulting in
New
Significant
Effects
New
Information
Showing
Greater
Significant
Effects than
Previous EIR
New
Information
Identifying
New
Mitigation
or
Alternative
to Reduce
Significant
Effect is
Declined
Minor
Technical
Changes
or
Additions
No
New
Impact/
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR found that, with the application of mitigation measures DSP-BIO-1 through DSP-BIO-9,
impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species, riparian habitat, jurisdictional waters, and migratory
wildlife would be less than significant. To further reduce impacts, PDF-BIO-1 through PDF-BIO-4
have been incorporated into the project.
The application of mitigation measures DSP-CR-1 through DSP-CR-9 were determined to reduce all
impacts to cultural and paleontological resources to below a level of significance.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. As described in Sections 5.4 and 5.5, the modified project is located within the
analysis area of the DSP EIR, and the proposed development is of a similar scale and form to that
previously analyzed. There are no new design features or impact areas that could result in
increased biological or cultural resources. The applicable mitigation measures of the DSP EIR—for
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
108
biological resources, DSP-BIO-1 and DSP-BIO-3 through DSP-BIO-9, and for cultural resources,
DSP-CR-1 through DSP-CR-9—are required to be applied to the modified project. As explained in
Section 5.4, DSP-BIO-2 is not applicable due to the subject species and mitigation area being well
outside the project site. In addition to mitigation measures, PDF-BIO-1 through PDF-BIO-4 will be
applied to the modified project to further reduce impacts to biological resources. Impacts to
biological and cultural resources are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR identified cumulatively considerable impacts related to air quality and GHG emissions
following the implementation of mitigation measures DSP-AQ-1 through DSP-AQ-5 and PDF-AQ-
1.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact.Cumulative impacts are defined as two or more individual effects that, when
considered together, are considerable or that compound or increase other environmental impacts.
The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment that results from the
incremental impact of the development when added to the impacts of other closely related past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable or probable future developments. Cumulative impacts can
result from individually minor, but collectively significant, developments taking place over a period.
The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130 (a) and (b), states:
(a) Cumulative impacts shall be discussed when the project’s incremental effect is
cumulatively considerable.
(b) The discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their
likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great detail as is
provided of the effects attributable to the project. The discussion should be guided by
the standards of practicality and reasonableness.
As discussed above, the modified project in conjunction with the Sports Complex development would
result in a lower intensity of development within the DSP, with a significant (45%) reduction in trip
generation and attendant declines in air pollutant and GHG emissions. Therefore, the severity of
these impacts would be reduced with the implementation of the modified project. The reduced scale
of overall development within the DSP would also result in no new cumulatively considerable impacts
under other impact areas. With implementation of existing regulations, PDFs, and the applicable
mitigation measures, the modified project would not result in any new significant impacts.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the DSP EIR
The DSP EIR concluded that all impacts that could result in substantial adverse effects on human
beings were mitigated to below a level of significance, with the exception of air quality and GHG
Artisan Alley
City of Lake Elsinore Addendum
109
emissions impacts, which were deemed significant and unavoidable after the implementation of
mitigation.
Impacts Associated with the Modified Project
No New Impact. As described in Sections 5.1 through 5.17, above, the modified project has no
new potentially significant impacts and no new mitigation measures would be required. The
implementation of applicable DSP EIR mitigation measures, PDFs, City standards, and City
guidelines would ensure that there would be no substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly. There would be no new impacts.
Project Design Features
Refer to PDFs from Sections 5.1 (Aesthetics), 5.3 (Air Quality), 5.4 (Biological Resources), 5.6
(Geology and Soils), 5.8 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials), 5.9 (Hydrology and Water Quality),
5.10 (Land Use and Planning), 5.12 (Noise), 5.14 (Public Services), 5.15 (Recreation), 5.16 (Traffic),
and 5.17 (Utilities and Service Systems. These PDFs are applicant-initiated actions which effectively
reduce potential environmental impacts.
Mitigation/Monitoring Required
No new impacts nor substantially more adverse impacts would result from the implementation of
the modified project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are required. No refinements
related to the modified project are necessary to the DSP EIR mitigation measures and no new
mitigation measures are required.
I 15 DIAMOND DRMILL ST
LAKESHORE DR
G
R
A
P
E S
T
M A LA G A R D
CASIN
O D
RMIS
SI
ON TRLAUTO CENTER D
R
VILLAGE PKWYAVENUE 6 ELM STPARK W AY
AVENUE 9 H I D D E N T R LSUMMIT DRHIGH STLINE DRCANYON VIEW DR
AVENUE 1 MASCOT SCENIC DRI 1
5 M A LA G A R D
H I D D E N T R L
I 15 DIAMOND DRMILL ST
LAKESHORE DR
G
R
A
P
E S
T
M A LA G A R D
CASIN
O D
RMIS
SI
ON TRLAUTO CENTER D
R
VILLAGE PKWYAVENUE 6 ELM STPARK W AY
AVENUE 9 H I D D E N T R LSUMMIT DRHIGH STLINE DRCANYON VIEW DR
AVENUE 1 MASCOT SCENIC DRI 1
5 M A LA G A R D
H I D D E N T R L
Planning Application 2016-38Vicinity Map
PROJECT SITE
´
I 1
5 DIAMOND DRG
R
A
P
E S
T
LAKESHORE DR
MALAGA RD
CASIN
O D
R
MI
SSI
ON TRLVILLAGE PKWYELM STH I D D E N T R LMORTON AVEELEANOR STLINE DRHERBERT AVELAKE PARK STAUTO CENTER D
R
BASEBALL DAWES ST
MASCOT G R A N D S L A M
PETE LEHR DR
MEADOW
STADIUM OUTFIELD LAKESHORE DR
I 1
5
I 1
5
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, U SDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN,IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
I 1
5 DIAMOND DRG
R
A
P
E S
T
LAKESHORE DR
MALAGA RD
CASIN
O D
R
MI
SSI
ON TRLVILLAGE PKWYELM STH I D D E N T R LMORTON AVEELEANOR STLINE DRHERBERT AVELAKE PARK STAUTO CENTER D
R
BASEBALL DAWES ST
MASCOT G R A N D S L A M
PETE LEHR DR
MEADOW
STADIUM OUTFIELD LAKESHORE DR
I 1
5
I 1
5
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, U SDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN,IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Planning Application 2016-38Aerial Map
PROJECT SITE
´