Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 2015-029 City Council ResoRESOLUTION NO. 2015 -029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTING ADDENDUM #1 TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2003 -04 FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2014 -02, A DEVELOPMENT OF EIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF PASADENA AVENUE AND HUNCO WAY WHEREAS, Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore for Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014 -06 ( "Project') for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way (APN 371 -120 -040 through 047), with outdoor storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas; and, WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines ") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014 -06, and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; and WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge /Diverge Analysis ('Reports ") were prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. to analyze any changes in traffic impacts caused by the subject Project, that were not previously addressed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; and WHEREAS, the Reports were conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that all potential traffic impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Reports provides some changes and additions to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore constitutes Addendum #1 to adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-04; and City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the Design Review of industrial projects; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015 -22 recommending that the City Council adopt Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ( "LEMC) the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for industrial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04, the CEQA documents, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: 1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge /Diverge Analysis, constitute Addendum # 1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04. 2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines. 3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration have occurred; specifically: City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029 Page 3 of 4 a. There have not been any substantial changes to the development of the subject property as analyzed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 that require major revisions of the CEQA documents because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 was adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA; and recommends to the City Council that it make the same finding. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 and Addendum #1 and finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 and Addendum #1 represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003- 04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02 City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029 Page 4 of 4 SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at � regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 28th of April, 2015. Mayor ATTEST: Virginia j-.1 Bloojh, City Clerk •---• • •- r, NO. -••• • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Virginia Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015 -029 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a Regular meeting held on the 28th day of April 2015, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Hickman, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Virginia-0. Bloo , .ity Clerk