HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 2015-029 City Council ResoRESOLUTION NO. 2015 -029
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE ADOPTING ADDENDUM #1 TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 2003 -04 FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.
2014 -02, A DEVELOPMENT OF EIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF
PASADENA AVENUE AND HUNCO WAY
WHEREAS, Steve Rawlings, Integris Development, has filed applications with
the City of Lake Elsinore for Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 2014 -06 ( "Project') for the development of eight (8) industrial buildings within
the existing Pasadena Industrial Park located at the northeast and southeast corners of
Pasadena Avenue and Hunco Way (APN 371 -120 -040 through 047), with outdoor
storage of materials and vehicles within gated and fenced -in areas; and,
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the
State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections
15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines ") because the Project involves an activity which may
cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease,
permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies
(Public Resources Code Section 21065); and
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2004, the City Council approved and adopted
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 which analyzed the environmental impacts
associated with the industrial park development of the subject property, which is now
part of Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2014 -06,
and the proposed industrial buildings proposed by the subject Project were part of the
whole action that was analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; and
WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Analysis and a Freeway Merge /Diverge Analysis
('Reports ") were prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. to analyze any changes in
traffic impacts caused by the subject Project, that were not previously addressed by
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04; and
WHEREAS, the Reports were conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that all potential traffic impacts
can be mitigated to less than significant levels; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Reports provides
some changes and additions to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and
therefore constitutes Addendum #1 to adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2003-04; and
City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning
Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to
the City Council pertaining to the Design Review of industrial projects; and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning
Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2015 -22 recommending that the City Council adopt
Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 for Industrial Design
Review No. 2014 -02; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
( "LEMC) the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making
decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning
Commission for industrial design review applications; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council
has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed
Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04, the CEQA documents,
and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved
projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that
would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some
changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is
necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason,
pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Traffic Impact
Analysis and a Freeway Merge /Diverge Analysis, constitute Addendum # 1
to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04.
2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines.
3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the
analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in
Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration
have occurred; specifically:
City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029
Page 3 of 4
a. There have not been any substantial changes to the development of
the subject property as analyzed by Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2003 -04 that require major revisions of the CEQA documents because
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects;
b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the
circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that
require major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not
known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable
diligence at the time Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 was
adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2003 -04; (b) significant effects previously examined
will be substantially more severe than shown in Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2003 -04; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives which
are considerably different from those analyzed in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral,
received from persons who have reviewed Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2003 -04. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public
comments have been addressed.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that Addendum #1 to Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 for the Project is adequate and has been completed
in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for
implementation of CEQA; and recommends to the City Council that it make the same
finding. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 and Addendum #1 and finds that the
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -04 and Addendum #1 represents the
independent judgment of the City.
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the
City Council hereby adopts Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003-
04 for Industrial Design Review No. 2014 -02
City Council Resolution No. 2015 -029
Page 4 of 4
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at � regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 28th of April, 2015.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Virginia j-.1 Bloojh, City Clerk
•---• • •-
r,
NO. -••• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE )
I, Virginia Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2015 -029 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore, California, at a Regular meeting held on the 28th day of April 2015, and that
the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Council Member
Hickman, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Virginia-0. Bloo , .ity Clerk