HomeMy WebLinkAboutID# 14-526 Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 Amendment No.1 to Tentavie Tract Map 35337 Allowing Demoliton & Tentative Parcel Map 35336 Ameding Conditions of ApprovalCITY Or-
LADE LSIIYOFZE
DIM ANA EXI RE M E
DaGnnn ExraEnn [..
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor
And Members of the City Council
FROM: Grant Yates
City Manager
DATE: April 14, 2015
SUBJECT: Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, Amendment No. 1,
Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 & Tentative
Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 — Requests by Pacific
Coves Investments, LLC. to amend Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
No. 2005 -02 and related Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 to Allow
for the Demolition of an Existing Private Residence that Included
Equestrian And Swimming Facilities Within Planning Area 3; and
to Amend the Conditions of Approval for Approved Financing
and Conveyance Parcel Map No. 35336 to Modify and /or Delete
Previously Approved Conditions of Approval.
APPLICANT: Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, 1200 Quail Street,
Suite 200, Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
OWNER: Andrew Dubill, Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, LLLP, 1200
Quail Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, Ca 92660
Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
Adopt Resolution No. 2015 - _; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore Adopting Addendum 41 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01 for
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, Tentative Tract
Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment
No. 1.
2. Adopt Ordinance No. 2015 - ; An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore Approving Amendment No. 1 to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02
located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 2 of 8
Main Street.
3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 located on a
259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street.
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore Approving Tentative Parcel Map No.35336, Amendment No. 1 located on a
259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street.
Background
On March 17, 2015, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission unanimously (5 -0)
recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
and related amendments to the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 35337.
The Commission also unanimously recommended approval of an amendment to the
conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map No.35336, a financing and conveyance
map for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan.
Project Request and Location
The proposed project consists of three applications related to the 259 -acre Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan, which is located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its
intersection with Main Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers 377 - 250 -011, 377 - 260 -004, 005
and 006, 377- 350 -004, 007, 008, 010, 014, 015, 016, and 017). The three applications are:
Amendment No. 1 to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02 is a requested
amendment to revise the Specific Plan document with several revisions that will
allow for the demolition of an existing residential complex known as the Delaney
Ranch Complex also known as the "Tarzan House ". This amendment will remove all
text referencing the preservation of the Delaney Ranch Complex and associated
facilities within the 0.4 -acre centrally located Planning Area 3 (PA 3), Estate
Residential. If the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is approved, the applicant
intends to demolish the Delaney Ranch Complex.
2. Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 is a request to modify the
previously approved Conditions of Approval to delete all conditions requiring the
preservation of the Delaney Ranch Complex. The requested modification of the
conditions of approval will allow for the demolition of the existing residence and
associated facilities.
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 is a request to modify and /or
delete previously approved conditions of approval which are no longer applicable for
the division of approximately 259 acres into six (6) parcels for the purpose of
Financing and Conveyance only. Many of the original conditions are related to
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 3 of 8
actual development of the subject property. However, since a Financing and
Conveyance Map does not allow development most of the original conditions of
approval are not applicable. For this reason, the applicant is requesting that the
conditions be amended.
Previous Approvals
The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan was originally adopted by the Lake Elsinore City Council
on February 26, 2008, The Specific Plan allows the development of a maximum of 1,035
dwelling units consisting of a maximum of eight (8) estate residential dwelling units on 7.5
acres within the Estate Residential (0 -2 du /ac) designation, 515 dwelling units on 115.6
acres within the Single - Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac) designation, 222 dwelling units on
18.6 acres within the Courtyard Homes (8 -15 du /ac) designation and 290 dwelling units on
14.5 acres of the Multi - Family Residential (15 -20 du /ac) designation. The Specific Plan
also includes a 6.5 -acre park site, 85.8 acres of open space and 11.1 acres devoted to
Major Circulation.
Implementing development projects, Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 and Tentative Tract
Map No. 35337 were approved by the City Council on July 27, 2010. The Parcel Map
allows for future separate ownership of six (6) parcels, however no development is allowed
with the approval of this Finance and Conveyance Map.
Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 allows for the subdivision of the 258.83 gross acres into
four - hundred fifty -one (451) single - family residential lots, eight (8) estate residential lots,
two (2) courtyard home lots, one (1) multi - family residential or commercial lot, one (1) park
lot and twenty -three (23) open space lots. The tentative tract shows the combination of the
two separate park sites (PA 7 & PA 13) into a single 6.5 -acre park site.
Neither of these maps has been recorded. Since the State of California has granted
several automatic map extensions; both maps are in effect until July 27, 2016. The maps
are still eligible for extension(s) of time of up to a maximum of 36 additional months
through the City's Map Extension process.
One final request was submitted to the City relating to the Specific Plan and the private
residence. The Specific Plan stated that an existing structure located within Planning Area
3 shall be preserved and retrofitted for a future recreational club house. This residence
was considered to be of historical significance due to its possible connection to the famous
Hollywood actor Johnny Weissmuller, who was known for his role as "Tarzan" in several
1940's era Hollywood movies.
The applicant submitted an appeal to allow demolition of the house and a water tower only.
This appeal was to be heard by Planning Commission on July 7, 2011. The applicant
withdrew the appeal just prior to the hearing.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 4 of 8
Project Description
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02
This amendment is a request to amend the Specific Plan text to remove of all references
made to retaining the private residence and converting it into a Community Center within
Planning Area 3 (PA 3) of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. Specifically the private
residence and associated facilities consists of a single -story, U- shaped structure with
covered porches with a central courtyard. The associated facilities consist of a pool house,
a concrete pool (approximately 30' by 90') that has been filled in with soil for safety
reasons, and a 12' x 12' structure known as "the lookout ". Directly below this lookout
structure is an 8 feet deep concrete Cistern. The existing text in question states that the
"majority of the primary residential structure is intended to be preserved and integrated as
a Community Center." Furthermore the document stated that the "home may be renovated
and integrated into the park to form a larger community recreation facility, serving as an
important gathering place for resident." The attached Spyglass Ranch, Specific Plan
Amendment No. 1 (Hearing Draft) includes all the pages found in the Specific Plan where
the references will be removed and replaced with the text that states that the existing
residence may be "removed and the area used for recreational purposes" or "may be
removed, resulting in 0.4 additional acres available for recreational purposes."
At the time the Specific Plan was approved it was the strong belief that this home could be
considered of historic significance, although no professional historical research had been
completed to prove or disprove this belief.
Originally the applicant was in agreement with the renovation of the residence. As time
has gone by the residence in question and associated facilities have been badly vandalized
regardless of the applicant's continuous attempts to prevent these activities (See attached
Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex).
In order to resolve the question of whether the residence is of historic significance a
focused cultural resources study was prepared by John Minch and Associates, to
determine the historical and architectural significance of the Delaney Ranch Complex. The
study was conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The report found that " none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered
architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no
adverse impacts to historic resources. Therefore, no additional measures in conjunction
with cultural resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool
or Lookout." (See attached Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch
House Complex.)
Additionally, the Lake Elsinore Historical Society was notified of the proposed demolition of
the Delaney Ranch House originally in 2009. At that time the Society felt the property
should be preserved. However, the Lake Elsinore Historic Society received additional
information as stated in a letter dated June 27, 2012 and unanimously reversed their
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 5 of 8
previous declaration. This was due to the fact that there was no information /documentation
available to verify that Johnny Weissmuller ( "Tarzan ") owned this property. It appears that
all information relating to the presences of Johnny Weissmuller at this site was hearsay.
(See attached letter from the Lake Elsinore Historical Society)
Tentative Tract Map No. 35337
This is a request to revise all the Conditions of Approval that relate to the preservation of
the Delaney Ranch Complex.
Tentative Parcel Map 35336
The applicant has requested to modify and /or delete previously approved conditions of
approval which are not applicable for the division of approximately 259 acres into six (6)
parcels for the Financing and Conveyance purposes only. A Financing Map does not allow
any development. It is created for the purpose of selling off parcels only, thereby providing
funding for future development. Therefore, new Conditions of Approval are presented for
review and approval.
Analysis
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02
The question of whether or not the Delaney Ranch Complex could be considered
historically significant at the federal and state levels has been determined by the extensive
evaluation titled "Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House
Complex..." Laura White, M.A., June 2014. The evaluation found that there would be no
adverse impacts to historic resources by demolishing the Delaney Ranch Complex.
Furthermore the Lake Elsinore Historical Society found that there was no evidence
substantiating that the Delaney Ranch Complex was ever owned or occupied or even
visited by the actor Johnny Weissmuller (this was one of the reasons many felt that the
Complex should be preserved).
City Planning and Engineering staffs have reviewed the materials supplied by the applicant
and have found that the request is acceptable. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of
the request to remove all text referring to the preservation of the Delaney Ranch Complex
and thus allowing the demolition of the Complex.
However, it is noted that the current version of the specific plan does not reflect the
combination of the two identified park sites into a single 6.5 -acre park. For this reason, the
revised conditions of approval for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, require the
preparation of a complete specific plan document that reflect the combination of the two
parks (Planning Areas 7 and 13) into a single 6.5 -acre park site and the park improvements
set forth in the revised Conditions of Approval.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 6 of 8
Tentative Tract Map 35337
Deletion of the three conditions of approval is necessary to allow the applicant to demolish
the complete Delaney Ranch Complex that has be a target for graffiti for some time, thus
creating an eye sore from many locations below the hill top site including Main Street and
the 1 -15 Freeway.
The modification of the conditions of approval does not alter the number of dwelling units,
land uses or density within the Specific Plan. Staff is in agreement with this request to
revise the related conditions. In addition to the deletion of the three applicable conditions of
approval, the complete conditions of approval have been updated, including the addition of
new conditions that identify the specific park improvements that need to be constructed
have been added.
Tentative Parcel Map 35336
The previous Conditions of Approval were written as though the map was allowing
development when in fact, the map is intended to be for Financing and Conveyances
Purposes only. Therefore, the applicant's request to remove these conditions is
reasonable. Staff is has prepared revised conditions that are more applicable to a
Financing and Conveyance Map and recommends approval.
Environmental Determination
On February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the Spyglass Ranch
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007 -01 (SCH No. 2006121069)
which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the development of the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 and Tentative Tract Map
No. 35337 were part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan EIR.
In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present
substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or
Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information
contained in the certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For
this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical
and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located at 523 West
Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, dated June 2014 and
prepared by John Minch and Associates, constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental
Impact Report No. 2007 -01. Staff recommends adoption of Addendum #1 to EIR No.
2007 -01.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 7 of 8
Fiscal Impact
The time and costs related to the processing Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02,
Amendment No. 1, Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 have been covered by the Developer Deposit
paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the
processing of this application.
In order to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety
operations and maintenance issues in the City, the project has been conditioned that the
applicant consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the
proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and
Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan Condition of Approval No. 90 & Tentative Tract No. 35337 Condition of Approval No.
176). Additionally, Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Condition of Approval No. 91 & Tentative
Tract No. 35337 Condition of Approval No. 177 requires the applicant to consent to the
formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community
Facilities District No. 2015 -2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on -going operation and
maintenance of the public right -of -way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be
maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right -of -way for which the City will
pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including
parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and
federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project.
No grading permits or building permits can be issued solely on the basis of Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, Amendment No. 1 or Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336,
Amendment No. 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1, under which
permits can be issued, is conditioned for payment of all applicable development impact
fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment.
Prepared by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate
Planning Manager
Grant Taylor
Director of Community Development
Approved by: Grant Yates
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Aerial Map
3. City Council Ordinance /Resolutions
4. Revised Conditions of Approval for Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPA 2014 -01, AMD. No.1, TTM 35337, TPM 35336
April 14, 2015
Page 8 of 8
5. Revised Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 35337
6. Revised Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map 36336
7. Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No. 1 (Hearing Draft)
8. Tentative Tract Map 35337
9. Tentative Parcel Map 35336
10. Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex
11. Letter from the Lake Elsinore Historical Society dated October 19, 2012
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35336, AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSE
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The proposed protect (TPM 35336 for Financing and Conveyance Purposes) is a
request to modify and /or delete previously approved conditions of approval which
are no longer applicable for the division of approximately 258 acres into six (6)
parcels for the purpose of Financing and Conveyance only. No development will
be allowed with this approval.
The applicant shall defend (with
counsel acceptable
to the City), indemnify, and
hold harmless the City, its
Officials Officers
Employees and Agents
for any
claim action or proceeding
against the City, its Officials Officers,
Employees or
Agents to attach set aside
void or annul an
approval of the City,
its advisory
agencies appeal boards or legislative body
concerning the proposed
project
attached hereto.
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements for the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions
of Approval.
4. In the event an association or other legally responsible entity fail to maintain
applicable improvements in such a manner as to cause same of to constitute a
public nuisance said City may, upon proper notice and hearing institute
summary abatement procedures an impose a lien for the cost of such abatement.
5. All future development with the Parcel Map area shall conform to all standards
set forth in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and General Plan. Current
landowner shall disclose to all potential buyers the requirements to conform to all
standards and provisions of the LEMC and General Plan.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
6. This six (6) parcel tentative map is for financing and conveyance purposes only.
A subsequent tract map or parcel map shall be required to subdivide this
property. The development of each Parcel shall be subject for specific review and
conditions of approval. Specific conditions of approval related to traffic
circulation grading drainage right -of -way dedications, mitigation fees, and other
related engineering requirements and /or mitigations shall be required when the
property is subdivided or at time of development. The development of each
Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Area and /or Phase shall be subject for specific review and conditions of
approval. Note that with a completion of a Project Study Report of the 115 /Main
Street Interchange Upgrade additional right way could be required along Camino
Del Norte.
7. Each parcel shall have legal access to public right -of -way.
8. The applicant shall offer for dedication Elsinore Hills Road and Lots 'BB' and 'CC'
for roadway right -of -way. The width of Elsinore Hills Road shall be 90 feet and
the width of Lots 'BB' and 'CC' shall be 60 feet.
9. The processing of this map shall conform to the requirements of the Subdivision
Map Act.
10.The developer shall be responsible for acquiring right -of -ways in which the
developer or the City has no legal title or interest
Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
-
--
- - -
.. - - - -
Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35336, AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSE
Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
rnsrr_zrar�err.�r�:�vr_rxm��
-
-„
..
■- 9 ■ --
......... _
• -
Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
- --
- . -
Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35336, AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSE
11- NEW
IS �-ZIWTMZ
Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
17
IS �-ZIWTMZ
Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
aRCEL MAP NO. 35336. AMEP
'■ -
1
♦• 1
MEN _ NIP
1 1 I Oil 11114 _
Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35336, AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSE
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
AT
A.
Nam EA
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
%Df`CI RfiAD PIn 4C44C A1111CKIRIVIC.IT KI^ A
vtn
Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
. ■-
ONOWNFROUPWINJIF "—sal-
-
*e
61 "Iffiftyll.
0- M" e
NMI-
11 Him
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
ONOWNFROUPWINJIF "—sal-
-
*e
61 "Iffiftyll.
0- M" e
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
/ 1 I • -
-
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1RCFL MAP NO A5AAA AMFmnmr -NT NO 9
W.-OWN 111 W
M211111111 MIN". Ow
MIN
W-1*1111 NO,
Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
;•■ 11111 2
....
ITHMM
- -
- - -- •
Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Mimi
Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
1- ZIN IN
(Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing regarding
Amendment No. 1 to Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, with strikethrough text being
deleted and underlined text being added.)
Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 13 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
SPYGLASS RANI H
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO, I
HEARING DRAFT
A %aster TfannedCommunity in the City of Lake EGsinore
Prepared for:
SPYGLASS RANCH (RIVERSIDE) ASLI V LLLPvP= iir;..4Soz°cizid8l'r, -:-cc
923_ North Pennsylvan a Avenue?40 N r; GeHtff r n
Winter Park, FL 32789�1esvgertl3eae}r, 0660
(714).31873 5 00�n 5 -72-24
Contact: Erik Lunde
Prepared by:
T&B PLANNING INC-G'
17542 East 17 °i Street, Suite 100
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 505 -6360
Contact: Joel Morse
ln- Gtmst,Aa'er�
__ate To Be DeteruzinedAYp.,,.,,. vim,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,�� ,
G
N
C.
d
Cq
.J
v
v
m
a
3 <
®% � °':
�� .dc
SPYGLASS RANCH I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
which may include amenities such as tot lots, picnic areas, ball fields, and play fields. On -site trails
and sidewalks also provide connections to the 85.8 acres of open space located throughout SPYGLASS -
RANCH, as well as to off -site regional recreation facilities and trails.
The SPYGLASS RANCH Specific Plan also allows for the development of commercial- retail uses if
multi- family residential units are not developed. This 14.5 -acre commercial- retail shopping center is
intended to offer shopping opportunities and services for residents as well as the surrounding
community.
To complement the community's picturesque natural setting, the overall architectural design of
SPYGLASS RANCH emphasizes a "Rustic Californian" Community Theme. Architectural styles
within the community are contemporary interpretations of historical styles common to the region,
including Craftsman, Monterey, Spanish, and American Farmhouse. These styles consist of high -
quality design and are suitable for the wide variety of residential home types. To further an
appreciation for the area's rich pastoral past, an existing on -site abandoned equestrian ranch home
located in the center of the community may be retained and converted into the larger Community
Center. The community's unified landscaped concept enhances the SPYGLASS RANCH Community
Theme and is intended to evoke a sense of prairie living. The landscaping concept also creates a
sense of community identity for residents and visitors.
Table 1 -1, General Land Use Summary, sets forth the land uses for SPYGLASS RANCH.
TABLE I -1
GENERAL LAND USE SUMMARY
4.5
(fI
Multi- family Residential (15 -20 du /ac)* 1 14.5 1 20.0 1 290 11
6.6
Parks & Community Center 6.5 -- --
Open Space 85,8
Major Circulation 11.1
- Non- Res identdal Subtotals 103.4
* If Planning Areas 5 and 6 arc not developed with Multi - Family uses, a commercial land use designation shall apply for
development consistent with this Specific Plan.
One dwelling unit within Planning Area 3 ( "Estate Resident_i_a_P_) may be removed, resulting in 0.4 additional acres
available foi- recreational_pmposes,,
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO_ 1(11EARING DRAFT DATE TO BE DETERMINED_ PPRaV ^ "" r'^' a^ "
FEBRUARY- iv, c�,vv& .. _ .. _.. Page 1 -7
SPYGLASS RANCH IL INTRODUCTION AND PROJF,CT SETTING
11. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SETTING
A. PROJECT SETTING
1. LOCATION AND ACCESS
The SPYGLASS RANCH community is located on 259.6 acres of generally undeveloped land, east of
Interstate 15 (I -15) along the Corona /Temecula corridor in the City of Lake Elsinore (see Figure II -1,
Regional Map). The City of Lake Elsinore is situated in an emerging area of western Riverside
County, between the growth areas of Corona to the north and Murrieta to the south. The
metropolitan areas of Los Angeles and San Diego are within 100 miles to the northwest and south,
respectively. The SPYGLASS RANCH community is located six miles east of the Cleveland National
Forest, eight miles south of the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, and one mile south of
Alberhill Creek and the San Jacinto River. The community occupies a portion of the northern half of
Section 5 of Township 6 South, Range 4 West of the San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
Western Riverside County is served by major freeways connecting the area to Orange County,
central Riverside County, and San Bernardino County. Major north -south access to SPYGLASS
RANCH is provided by the Interstate 15 (1 -15) freeway, which connects the community to San Diego
County to the south and central Riverside County and San Bernardino County to the north.
Additionally, State Route 74 (SR -74) provides connection to the City of Perris to the east and south
Orange County to the southwest. Specifically, vehicular access to the SPYGLASS RANCH community
is provided by the existing Main Street off -ramp of the 1 -15 freeway and the Camino del Norte
frontage road (see Figure 11 -2, Vicinity Map).
2. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
The majority of the community site is currently undeveloped and generally vacant, with the
exception of an abandoned private residence with swimming, ranch, and equestrian facilities (see
Figure II -3, Aerial Photograph). The private residence may, be removed and the area used for
recreatioiia��oses:�� p. . � mto— a- }arger- Eemtrtuni}y
I SPA D Nee Q..o C., ml.,.i
,,,�,- o,- ,�az,T,� Additionally, an existing cell
tower is located in the southern portion of the project and is planned to be relocated within the site.
Over the years, a network of graded dirt roadways have been created to provide access within the
site. The community is bordered to the north, east, and south by relatively vacant land and rural
residences, and to the west by 1 -15 and Camino del Norte. Figure II -4, Existing Land Uses, depicts
the SPYGLASS RANCH site and surrounding properties.
The City of Lake Elsinore is transitioning from a small rural town to an urbanized community as a
result of the population growth in Riverside County, lower property costs, and the increasing
availability of high - quality recreation amenities. Current land use patterns are based largely on a
local economy that focuses on tourist- oriented trade and services and light manufacturing. The
majority of the I -15 corridor has been developed over the years with commercial /industrial uses, with
residential uses becoming a continuation of the existing development pattern along Temescal
Canyon. As such, SPYGLASS RANCH is located within a newly developing area of the City of Lake
Elsinore. Several major residential development projects have been approved in the vicinity of
SPECIFIC PLAN „AMENDMENT NO. 1 (HEARING _DRAFT — DATE, TO _BEDETERMINED_. 6
I' zovv Page 2.1
SPYGLASS RANCH II. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECTSETTING
SPYGLASS RANCH, including: Tuscany Hills Specific Plan; Ramsgate Specific Plan; North Peak
Specific Plan; and Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan.
3. PHYSICAL SITE CONDITIONS /ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The topography of the community site is characterized by small valleys, ridgelines, and canyons,
ranging in elevation from approximately 1,290 feet above mean sea level (MSL) in the southwest
portion of the property to approximately 1,845 feet above MSL in northeast portion of the site (see
Figure II -5, Topographic Map). Soils that underlie the community consist of sandy loam and
decomposed granitic bedrock. Typical of the Lake Elsinore area, clusters of boulders and rock
outcroppings also occur throughout the site.
Located in the center of the site is a private residence — with —a ezte'ed —ss . nd
equeAfifll7tt i' tie- S - - -fhe na}er ty o€- the -prrt: a nal str R� ded teed
i§3trflii'El° -..,. �,..� r.. ��. .,,.. n (•,l •... a., f...,, 4i,,...,. C,,,, a •a,.
eg' � -a-cvn front. �- c- �ric�m�eerttber�van�- rttdiatL �r�czuctdrt�„s- a;;�= Prarrc,�
n ., a,: .. :., _ _ ,o that may
..� °�4ar+ees- peHterr�e# c,'',. �neh e€�-a, ����te� - ---- y
be remove _and the area used fcx recreational purposes,,
The predominant vegetation on the site consists of non - native introduced grasses and patches of
Riversidean Sage Scrub habitat. Non - native landscape, turf, and ornamental plants have been
incorporated into landscaped areas around the existing private residence, ranch, and equestrian
facilities. Additionally, a small number of Cherry Trees and California Junipers grow along an
ephemeral drainage near the northwestern corner of the site.
Two prominent drainage washes exist on the site: one drains the central part of the site to the south
and the other drains the northwestern part of the site to the west. Flows in these drainages occur
during and shortly after runoff events due to the small watershed area, porous soils, and steep
gradients present within the area surrounding the community. No streams, rivers, or standing water
resources are located within the project area, which results in very low wildlife activity.
SPYGLASS RANCH is located in a seismically active Southern California region. However, based on
information from the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, there
are no active faults crossing the community site.
B. PROPERTY SUMMARY
1. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS
The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) assigned to the SPYGLASS RANCH site include: 377 - 250 -011,
377- 350 -004, 377 - 350 -007, 377 - 350 -008, 377- 350 -010, 377 - 350 -014, 377- 350 -015, 377 - 350 -016,
377- 350 -017, 377 - 260 -004, 377 - 260 -005, and 377 - 260 -006. Figure 1I -6, Parcel Identification Map,
graphically depicts the APNs included within the SPYGLASS RANCH Specific Plan boundaries.
2. GENERAL PLAN
SPYGLASS RANCH is comprised of approximately 259.6 acres within the jurisdictional limits of the
City of Lake Elsinore. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan designates the community site as
Future Specific Plan (3.0 du /ac maximum density.), Freeway Business, and Neighborhood
SPECIFIC PLAN AMEN NDMENT NO,. 1 (HEARING DRAFT)_ DATE TO BE _DETERMINED
_ . - . -
Page 2 -6
G
N
F
N
C
G
ro
F
I lie
3
SPYGLASS RANCH III. SPECIFIC PLAN
Section 1V, Design Guidelines, sets forth standards for an aesthetically cohesive environment that
incorporates the natural topography and landscape of the SPYGLASS RANCH community. This section
also offers a more in -depth description of how the Community Theme of "Rustic Californian" is
portrayed in the community's architecture and landscape elements.
As summarized in Table 111 -1, Detailed Land Use Summary, SPYGLASS RANCH is divided into 12
planning areas. Planning areas are separated by major internal roadways and topographic features
and have been dispersed across the community to ensure land use compatibility.
Table III -1 DE,1AiLED LAND USE SUTNIN1ARY
RL.'SlDENTIAL
1
s (8 -15 du /ac
7Family
10.4
8 -15 du /ac
124
2
sidential (4 -8 du/ac)
21.5
4 -8 du /ac
98
3 **
l (0 -2 du /ac
0.4
0 -2 du /ac
1
4
sidential (4 -8 du/ac)
34.6
4 -8 du /ac
134
5*
Multi-Family Residential 15 -24 du /ac
6.1
15 -20 du /ac
122
6*
Multi- Family Residential 15 -24 du/ac)
8.4
15 -20 du /ac
168
9
Single-Family Residential (4 -8 du/ac )
30.9
4-8 du /ac
135
10
Estate Residential 0 -2 du /ac)
7.1
0 -2 du /ac
7
11
Single-Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
28.6
4 -8 du /ac
148
12
Courtyard Homes (8 -15 du /ac)
8.2
8 -15 du /ac
98
- RESIDENTLU SUB TOTALS
156.2
6.6du /ac
1,035
NoN- RESIDLNTLAL
_7
Park
3.0
8A
Open Space
39.7
--
813
Open Space
11.6
8C
Open Space
4.1
13
Park
3.5
14A
Open Space
6.5
14B
Open Space
5.7
14C
Open Space
3.1
14D
open Space
12.8
14E
Open Space
1.6
- NON- RESIDENTUIL SUBTOTALS
92.3
--
--
MAJOR CIRCULATION
11.1
--
--
* If Pluming Areas 5 and 6 are not developed with Multi - Family uses, a commercial land use designation shall apply for
development consistent with this Specific Plan
"'_nne dwelling unLL withiq Plannmg_Arei 3 may removed�resnlhnam 0.4 additional_ acres available for recreational
purposes — - __ _ _ _.___ _
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT. No. DRAFT) — DATE TO BE DETERMINED ,AFFRGVEDD B), �--TY Geuwti:
-- . .------ -... ____ ,.... _...
FEMUARi=zvzvvv - -- - -- page 3 -3
SPYGLASS RANCH
2. LAND USES
III. SPECIFIC PLAN
The proposed land uses within SPYGLASS RANCH are described in the following section.
❑ RESIDENTIAL USES
A maximum of 1,035 homes are planned on 156.2 acres or 60% of the SPYGLASS RANCH total
acreage. The gross overall average density for the community is 4.0 du /ac. Neighborhoods vary in
density from 0 -2 du /ac, 4 -8 du /ac, 8 -15 du /ac, and 15 -20 du /ac and include a variety of housing
product types, including estate homes, single - family homes, courtyard homes, and multi- family units
(such as apartments or townhomes). Neighborhoods are dispersed among manufactured slopes and
natural open space, and residents benefit from numerous park and recreational amenities within close
walking distance from their homes.
• Estate Residential (0 -2 du /ac) consists of 8 homes on 7.5 acres in Planning Area 3 and
10. This land use category comprises 3% of the Specific Plan acreage and 1% of the total
dwelling units. The existing residence within Planning Area, 3 inlay-be ,removed_and the
area used for recreational purposes,,.
• Single- Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac) consists of 515 homes on 115.6 acres in Planning
Area 2, 4, 9, and 11. This land use category comprises 45% of the Specific Plan acreage
and 50% of the total dwelling units.
• Courtyard Homes (8 -15 dulde) consists of 222 homes on 18.6 acres in Planning Area 1
and 12. This land use category comprises 7% of the Specific Plan acreage and 17% of
the total dwelling units.
• Multi - Family Residential (15 -20 dulac) consists of 290 homes on 14.5 acres in Planning
Area 5 and 6. This land use category comprises 6% of the Specific Plan acreage and 33%
of the total dwelling units. If multi - family residential units are not developed in these
areas, a commercial land use designation shall apply for development consistent with this
Specific Plan.
❑ OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
A total of 92.3 acres are proposed as open space and recreation within SPYGLASS RANCH, which
represents 36% of the total community acreage. Open space and recreation areas are classified as
parks, hails, and open space.
• Parks: A total of two parks, totaling 6.5 acres, are planned in Planning Area 7 and 13 and
offer a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities for residents within
SPYGLASS RANCH. Both parks are within easy walking distance from residential
neighborhoods. Parks are discussed in greater detail in Section 1V, Design Guidelines.
One dwelling unit within Planning Area 3 maybe removed,,..icsuhina in 0.4 additional
acres available for recreational .purposcs,
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO 1jHEARING_DRAFT),_ DATE T_O BE, DETERMINED _.^PPReVEE)- 13, -- Q- 16-QD44 G4L-
F^^^ %008 Page 3.4
SPYGLASS RANCH III. SPECIFIC PLAN
3. PLANNING AREA 3 — ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (0.0 — 2.0 DU /AC)
a. Descriptive Summary
Planning Area 3, as shown on Figure III -4, contains an existing private residence tha"nehteles
equesttk r;- a�- �;- ,rirrtri;,�aa;- 4ities. 'Fkri� reneva�- a+3d- }r#eg.�a-- .�- me�jaec�rrE
3.0 ac e_ "" r a a rani#3 r ano a crl ty sery trg a�an +�portarH�a her: e
which may be
remo ed and *h, area used for recrcat o7a purpo;c ,.
Additionally, an existing cell tower in the southern portion of the community may be relocated
within Planning Area 3.
b. Land Use and Development Standards
More detailed information regarding vehicular and pedestrian access points, edge conditions,
landscaping, architecture, monumentation, walls and fencing, and development standards is provided
in Section IV, Design Guidelines, and Section V, Development Regulations.
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1(HEARING_DRAFT�._ DATE TO.BE DETERMINED_APPR--VED " " r
- m�rrr -c"' - euNc,c
n< mono
EaR6r 21 moo, �o
Page 3 -10
6
0.�
U
.w.
W
G
ti
a
r7
m M
N
K 6
w m
G
3`
PE .mac
SPYGLA% RANCH 111. SPECIFIC PLAN
7. PLANNING AREA 7 — PARK
a. Descriptive Summary
Planning Area 7, as shown on Figure 111-6, provides for the development of a 3.0 -acre park
adjacent to Planning Area 4 (Single - family Residential) and Planning Area 8A (Open Space).
The adjacent Planning Area 3 (Estate Residential) contains an existing private residences
includes- e�s4rian- an���g- faeihties. T-ki� heme -m.a�} "��°n^�'°a -A na :,.- �t�grat�;,to
the g-atherifig place
fog dais which ma be refnoved and the area used to recreational purposes. Additionally, an
....- ........
existing cell tower in the southern portion of the community may be relocated within Planning Area
7.
Proposed amenities for the park may include, but are not limited to:
• Tennis courts
G Sand volleyball courts
• Basketball courts
• Tot lot
• Shade tree plantings and rolling turf areas
• Picnic facilities
• On -site parking
Vehicular access to Planning Area 7 is provided from local roads via Elsinore Hills Drive.
Pedestrian access is provided via sidewalks adjacent to these roadways and via the community's
extensive trails system.
b. Land Use and Development Standards
More detailed information regarding vehicular and pedestrian access points, edge conditions,
landscaping, architecture, monumentation, walls and fencing, and development standards is provided
in Section IV, Design Guidelines, and Section V, Development Regulations.
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 (HEARING DRAFT - DATE TO BE DETERMINED APPRe VEB By OFFY Ge-UNG11
z� Page 3 -16
p CI
U
ro ,n
z �
o _
u �
C
w
dI
NO
®`m`
SPYGLASS RANCH III. SPECIFIC PLAN
C. OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FLAN
1. DESCRIPTION
As shown in Figure III -13, Open Space and Recreation Plan, approximately 92.3 acres (36% of the
community) is devoted to open space and recreational land uses. The SPYGLAss RANCH Open Space
and Recreation Plan provides for numerous recreational amenities, including hails, sidewalks, a
variety of parks, and a community center. The elements and acreage of the plan are further identified
in Table III -2, Open Space and Recreation Plan Summary.
Table III -2 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN SUMMARY
7
I� 1
Park
3.0
8A
Open Space
39.7
813
Open Space
11.6
8C
Open Space
4.1
13
Park
3.5
14A
Open Space
6.5
14B
Open Space
5.7
14C
Open Space
3.1
14D
Open Space
118
14E
Open Space
1.6
One dwelLine unit w =thin PlannmgArea 3 m be removed _ultin m 0_4 addition rl acres available for recreational purgpses.
In addition to the recreational amenities provided on site, residents of the community may enjoy
several local and regional parks that are located within close proximity to SPYGLASS RANCH. The
4.0 -acre Lake Elsinore City park is located approximately 0.75 -mile southwest of the community and
features amenities such as play equipments, picnic areas and benches, barbeques, horseshoe courts, a
concession stand, and on -site restrooms and parking. Swick & Matich Park is approximately 0.75
mile west of the community and features baseball, softball, football, and soccer fields on 7.0 acres.
Tuscany Hills Community Park is a 5.0 -acre park located to the east of the community. This park
offers baseball and softball fields, tot lots and play equipment, and picnic facilities. Other parks
within close proximity to SPYGLASS RANCH include Kabian County Park, Harrelson Memorial Park,
and Yarborough Park. Detailed program elements and acreage of the Open Space and Recreation
Plan for the SPYGLASS RANCH Specific Plan are described below:
Cl PARKS
As depicted in Section IV, Design Guidelines, two parks are planned within the SPYGLASS RANCH
development, providing a total of 6.5 acres of recreation. The 3.5 -acre public park in Planning Area
13 provides numerous active and passive recreational amenities, which may include volleyball
courts, basketball courts, a tot lot, shade tree plantings and rolling turf areas, picnic facilities,
soccer /football fields, baseball /softball fields, and roller hockey, and on -site parking. This park is
conveniently located at the intersection of Street "D" and Elsinore Hills Drive. A smaller 3.0 -acre
park is situated within Planning Area 7. This park abuts Planning Area 4 (Single - family Residential)
and Planning Area 8A (Open Space). A variety of active and passive recreational amenities are
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT No. 1(HEARING DRAFT DATE TO BE DETERMINED _raPROtv^- o,- cm- coo,aciv
f °��^ Page 3 -31
�.
0
v
v
a
G
ro
A
P®��y 3?
a!�d ��'
SPYGLASS RANCH III. SPECIFIC PLAN
planned for the park including, but not limited to: tennis courts, sand volleyball courts, basketball
courts, a tot lot, shade tree planting and rolling turf areas, picnic facilities, and on -site parking. An
existing residence in Planning Area 3 may be t.: ^� "�� °�. a �`� " ° a °� �,.c le 4
eammunity eei tai vl�ish may sore as the ^tea ri 3g leeallo }v forresidents o-f�PYGLA-ss
RANCH. removed and, _the area used ion recreational purposes,
❑ OPEN SPACE
A comprehensive open space system, consisting of 85.8 acres, is designed to take advantage of
SPYGLASS RANCH scenic characteristics while maintaining environmentally - sensitive natural habitat.
Planning Areas 8A through 8C and 14A through 14E are designated as Open Space. Rolling
topography, sensitive biological resources, and rock outcropping are situated within these open space
areas, creating a scenic view from the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Open Space areas also
function as a buffer between the community and off -site land uses, including the adjacent Camino
Del Norte and 1 -15 freeway. Finally, these open space areas encourage active and passive
recreational activities and include an integrated trail system.
❑ T1zAILs
As shown in figure III -14, Coneeptual Trails Plan, the SPYGLASS RANCH community includes an
extensive hails system. In addition, concrete sidewalks are located adjacent to all major internal
roadways. These sidewalks and soft - surface trails are intended to encourage activities such as
walking, jogging, and bicycling.
An existing 10 -foot trail will be preserved with Planning Area 8A (Open Space). This existing trail
provides access from the southwestern portion of the community adjacent to Planning Area 6 (Multi-
family Residential) to Planning Area 2 (Single- family Residential) in the northwestern portion of the
community. A second trail is planned to traverse the southern, eastern, and northern portions of the
community, providing connections to the existing trail's northern and southern terminus points and
other existing off -site trails located east of the community. This 10 -foot trail provides immediate
pedestrian access to the majority of the residential planning areas, as well as the park in Planning
Area 13.
2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
I The SPYGLASS RANCH Specific Plan shall be incorporated into the City of Lake Elsinore
Parks Master Plan or a similar entity capable of maintaining open space and recreation areas.
2. All recreation facilities will be landscaped and, where necessary, irrigated in a manner that is
conducive to the type of plant material and landscape setting.
3. Landscaping within open space and recreation areas will be further governed by the Design
Guidelines (Section IV) of this Specific Plan.
4. The project is subject to fees for neighborhood and community park facilities, in
accordance with the City's Parkland Development Fees. These fees shall be paid or
facilities provided in lieu of fees for each dwelling unit constructed within the Specific
Plan. Credit against these fees shall be granted by the City for all public park land and
improvements provided by the developer.
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO_ 1_(HEARING _DRAFT) DATE TOBE_DETERMINED APPRAVED- Bi- QPF-O9HNGIL
FEBRnAm, 26, 2008 Page 3 -33
x
i
a
C
a
u
N
�F
^1
SPYGLASS RANCH IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES
community's design concept. The design concept shall include elements such as tree
clustering, diversity, and thematic hardscape to reinforce the project theme and character.
3. In selected locations, raised planters may be used as local street medians to provide a higher
level of street character and visual interest. Specific locations should be identified at the
tentative map stage.
4. All residential local streets may have curb - separated sidewalks creating a continuous street
tree planting strip between curbs and sidewalks.
4. OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
An important element of SPYGLASS RANCH is the provision of recreation and open space to enhance
the quality of living for residents of the community. Therefore, a comprehensive Open Space ana
Recreation Plan, Figure 111 -13, has been created to retain and enhance the rural character of
SPYGLASS RANCH through the provision of parks and open space. Individual components of the Opera
Space and Recreation Plan are discussed below and graphically depicted in greater detail on Figure
IV -24, Figure IV -25, and Figure IV -26. Figure N -27 provides a typical interface between park and
residential uses.
❑ 3.5-ACRE PARK
A 3.5 -acre park located adjacent to Elsinore Dills Drive is designated to provide ample recreational
opportunities for residents of SPYGLASS RANCH (see Figure IV -24, 3.5 -Acre Park Concept). This
active park is centrally located within the community adjacent to Elsinore Hills Drive, thereby
creating a visual focal point and enhancing the identity and character of SPYGLASS RANCH. This park
is intended to provide both active and passive recreational uses and may include a large "open- play"
turf area utilized for softball, soccer field, and other related uses. A meandering concrete sidewalk
should be provided to connect various areas of the park. The park should be further enhanced
through the integration of various landscape and hardscape elements to create a highly amenitized
recreational facility for residents of SPYGLASS RANCH.
❑ 3.0 -ACRE PARK
A 3.0 -acre park is located adjacent to an open space area within the SPYGLASS RANCH community to
take advantage of the rural character and views within the area. The 3.0 -acre park is intended to
provide recreation opportunities for residents within the western portion of the SPYGLASS RANCH
community. Proposed amenities for this park may include informal ball fields, "open- play" turf area,
and passive use areas, as depicted on Figure IV -25, 3.0 -Acre Park Concept. Adjacent to his 3.0 acre
park resides, an existing residence in planning Area 3. This home may ybe lemoved,.lesulting_ n 0 4
additional acres available for recreational purposes._
❑ TRAILS
A comprehensive linear park system has been designed to facilitate pedestrian movement and
interconnect the recreational amenities, neighborhoods, and potential commercial site within the
SPYGLASS RANCH community (see Figure 11I -14, Conceptual Trails Plan). Pedestrians can traverse a
variety of sidewalks, paseos, and pathways throughout the community. Paved walkways, paseos and
SPECIFIC PLAN AMEND
_ ,_, M ENT O.
N_.1-_-- (HEARING DRAFT DATE TO BE DETERMINED A"°"^"°^ BY CITY ^^ " ^
_
FEaRuARV26, 2 ®e8 Page 4 -48
i
a
z
U
Q
V
Z
Q
C
5
r
�f.
�a
SPYGLASS RANCH
VI. IMPLEMENTATION
A. PHASING PLAN
DESCRIPTION
VI. IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the SPYGLASS RANCH Specific Plan is expected to be developed in three (3) phases
over an approximate 10 -year period in response to market demands and according to a logical and
orderly redevelopment of uses, public utilities, and infrastructure. The timing and sequencing of
construction phases is advisory only and non - binding and actual development may vary.
Table VI -1, Phasing Plan Summary, provides a statistical breakdown of the Specific ]Plan Phasing
Plan. Figure VIA, Conceptual Phasing Plan, provides an illustration of the Phasing Plan.
TABLE VI -1
PHASING PLAN SUMMARY
LAND USE
®® DWELLING
UNITS
77Park
Estate Residential (0 -2 du /ac)
0.4
0 -2 du /ac
1
Single - Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
34.6
4 -8 du /ac
134
Multi - Family Residential (15 -20 da/ac)
5.5
15 -20 du /ac
122
Multi- Family Residential (15 -20 du /ac)
8.3
15 -20 du /ac
168
3.0
--
--
- PHASE I SUBTOTALS
51.8
8.2 Halite
425
PHASE II
9
Single-Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
30.9
4 -8 du/ac
135
11
Sin le -FamiL Residential (4 -8 du /ac )
28.6
4 -8 du /ac
148
12
Courtyard Homes (8 -15 du /ac)
8.2
8 -15 du /ac
98
1.3
Park
3.5
--
-PHASE 11 SUBTOTALS
71.2
5.4 rlu /ac
381
PHASE III
1
Courtyard Homes (8 -15 du /ac)
10.4
8 -15 du /ac
124
2
Single- Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
21.5
4 -8 du /ac
98
10
Estate Residential (0 -2 du /ac)
7.5
0 -2 du /ac
7
- PHASE III SUBTOTALS
39.0
5.9 du /ac
229
Opel) Space
85.8
--
--
Major Circulation
11.1
--
--
PROTECT TOTAL
259.8
4.0 du /ac
1,035
If Planning Areas 5 and 6 are not developed with Multi - Family uses, a commercial land use designation shall apply for
development consistent with this Specific Plan.
_-One dwelling unit within Plannjl Area may be removed resulting in 0.4 additional acres available for recreational
proposes.
2. PHASING STANDARDS
The phasing sequence, as described in Figure VI -1, is based on current market demand.
Certain areas may be developed out of the expected sequence, or in smaller increments,
provided required infrastructure and services are available at the time of development.
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT,NO. 1_- (HEARING DRAFT. ._ATE TO BE �DETERMIN- E „D,m -ricv dco- v,- cm- coMcA
Ffe
--- --- Page 6 -1
��iin
���
���
��
G
N
K y
U�
� rya
G
N
C
Y
�?
` ®� ��
�� ��
\ \ \�
\\ \:
�
- -�
\ e
\�
«
2kWl
' V
<2 J f 9% 2
\ ®m:
� ..
C4
is
FY
-9i
HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL EVALUATION OF THE DELANEY RANCH
HOUSE COMPLEX LOCATED AT 523 WEST MINTHORN STREET, CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:
Laura S. White, M.A.
Robert S. White
David M. Van Horn, Ph.D.
John Minch and Associates, Tue.
26623 Sierra Vista
Mission Viejo, CA 92692
Tel: (949) 367 -1000
Fax: (949) 367 -0117
Prepared for:
Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, LLLP
923 North Pennsylvania Avenue
Winter Park, FL 32789
Contact: Erik Lunde, Project Manager
Submitted to:
City of Lake Elsinore
Community Development
Planning Department
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
June, 2014
North view of Delaney Ranch House as viewed from bottom of hill (circa 1970).
(Photo courtesy of the Reed Webb family).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Management Summary
I. INTRODUCTION .
II. STUDY AREA LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENT.
III. A BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF LAKE ELSINORE..
IV. HISTORIC RESOURCE LISTINGS
V. HISTORICAL SOCIETY CORRESPONDENCE.
VI. LAND PATENTS.
VIL HISTORIC MAP RESEARCH .
VIII. PROPERTY HISTORY.
IX. THE DELANEY RANCH COMPLEX
X. FIELD SURVEY
XI. BUILDING RECORDS FOR THE STUDY AREA
XIL PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF 523 W. MINTORN STREET COMPLEX
XIII. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY
XIV. DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY
XV. RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES CITED.
APPENDIX A: Personnel Qualifications
APPENDIX B: Original Historic Property Inventory Form
APPENDIX C: Lake Elsinore Historical Society Correspondence
PAGE
u
3
3
12
14
15
15
17
26
26
27
27
30
32
33
35
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
Figure 1. Regional location of project area as indicated 2
on a portion of the USGS Santa Ana 1:100,000
topographic map sheet (1983).
Figure 2. Study area plotted on a portion of the 4
USGS Lake Elsinore 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle.
(1997).
Figure 3. Study area as shown on aerial photograph. 5
Figure 4. 1972 Riverside County Flood Control 18
and Water Conservation Map of Section 5,
Township 6 South, Range 4 West showing
locations of various buildings and structures
located within the Delaney Ranch complex.
Figure 5. Recent aerial showing former locations of 19
ranch building and structures.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Property ownership records from 1923 -1929. 21
Table 2. Property ownership records from 1930 -1946. 22
LIST OF PLATES
PAGE
Plate I. Top: Northwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House. 37
from access road to the east. Bottom: Southeasterly view
of Delaney Ranch House from hilltop to the northwest-
Plate II. Top: Southwesterly view of Delaney Ranch 38
from Pool House above. Bottom: West facing view
into courtyard showing damage.
Plate III. Top: 1981 photograph of courtyard looking 39
southwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission).
Bottom: Southwesterly view into courtyard as it
appears today.
Plate IV. Top: 1981 photograph of milk room looking 40
northwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission).
Bottom: Northwesterly view of converted milk room
into guest room.
Plate V. Top: Looking northeast through covered 41
porch toward arched entry on courtyard. Bottom:
Northwesterly view of original garage and carport..
Plate VI. Top: Northwesterly view of a cross - section. 42
of hollow the from the demolished courtyard wall.
Bottom: Close -up of intact ALBERHILL LOADBEARING
LAB CO hollow block building tile.
Plate VII. Top: Stamp of the AlberhiII LA Brick Co. 43
impressed into the hollow block building tile. Bottom:
Close -up of concrete "IP' blocks used in the construction
of Pool House.
Plate VIII. Top: Southwesterly view of Pool House and 44
back - filled swimming pool. Bottom: Southeasterly view
of deteriorated Pool House roof.
iii
PLATES (CONTINUED)
Plate IX. Top: Northeasterly view of back- filled pool 45
from Pool House. Bottom: Easterly view of deteriorated
diving board at the northeast end of pool.
Plate X. Top: 1981 photograph depicting Lookout, Pool, 46
and Pool House (Riverside Co. Historical Commission).
Bottom: Close -up of Lookout over cistern looking
Northwest as it appears today.
iv
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
At the request of Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, LLLP, John Minch and Associates
has undertaken a focused cultural resources study (historical and architectural) of the Delaney
Ranch House complex located within the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. The Delaney
Ranch House carries the address of 523 West Minthorn Street and lies within a 2.92 -acre parcel
identified as APN 337 - 350 -004. Presently, the house is vacant and has been uninhabited for
most of the last 25 -30 years. Proposed development plans include demotion of all buildings and
structures associated with the ranch to make way for future residential development.
A records search of the study area was conducted at the Eastern Information Center at
UC Riverside. It indicated that the residential complex had been previously evaluated for
historical significance by the Riverside County Historical Commission in 1982 and assigned the
status code of 3S (Appears eligible for National Register as an individual property through
survey evaluation). The resource was assigned the Primary # 33 -7228.
A thorough re- evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House complex comprised extensive
background research, interviews and field study. As a result, it was determined that the ranch
house was not constructed of adobe brick but of hollow tile and the swimming pool was
significantly smaller than Olympic size as first reported. Despite persistent claims of ownership
by Hollywood icon .Johnny Weissmuller of Tarzan fame, no connection of any kind could be
made.
An analysis of construction history coupled with the architectural evaluation indicated
that the original configuration of the ranch house has been significantly altered through a series
of poorly planned additions and other modifications. Additionally, the house has been only
sporadically occupied during the last 25 years resulting in extensive vandalism and generally
poor upkeep. Thus, the physical integrity of the building is poor to the point that restoration
seems infeasible.
In applying the criteria for historical and architectural significance contained within the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historical Resources
(CRHR), the Delaney Ranch House complex does not appear eligible for inclusion to either the
NRHP or CRHR. As presently proposed, the Delaney Ranch House and associated structures are
slated for demolition. However, since none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered
v
architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no adverse
impacts to historic resources. Therefore, no additional measures in conjunction with cultural
resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout.
vi
I. INTRODUCTION
The following report was written by John Minch and Associates, Inc. (JMA) at the
request of Spyglass Ranch (Riverside) ASLI V, LLLP. It describes the results of a historical and
architectural evaluation of a ranch house complex known as the Delaney Ranch. The vacant
property is located at 523 West Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County.
Current plans call for demolition of the ranch complex in conjunction with future residential
development.
The study described herein was conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it pertains to the management of cultural resources. The
purpose of the evaluation was to establish the historical and architectural significance of the
ranch complex which is over 50 years of age. This information is needed since adoption of the
proposed demolition plans could result in adverse effects upon one or more of the ranch
buildings. Therefore, the ranch complex was evaluated for historical and architectural
significance according to the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The evaluation consisted of: (1) a records search
conducted at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), University of California at Riverside, (2)
literature review, (3) archival research, (4) interviews, (5) correspondence with the Lake Elsinore
Historical Society, (6) survey and architectural analysis of surviving ranch buildings, and (7)
determinations of historical and architectural significance at the state and federal levels.
The records search and archival research for the project was conducted by Laura S.
White, M.A. (RPA & County approved). The intensive survey of the property was performed by
Laura S. White (Principal Investigator) and Robert S. White (Project Director, County
approved). The Delaney Ranch complex was evaluated for historical and architectural
significance by David Van Horn, Ph.D. (Architectural Historian). Dr. Van IIorn meets the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Architectural History. Qualification statements are
provided in Appendix A.
I
Figure 1. Regional location of the project area as indicated on a portion of the Santa Arza USGS 1:100,000
scale topographic map sheet (1983).
2
H. STUDY AREA LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENT
Regionally, the project area lies on a hilltop approximately one -mile southeast of
Highway 74 (Central Avenue) and just east of Interstate 15 in the City of Lake Elsinore,
Riverside County (fig. 1). It overlooks Lake Elsinore and the City's historic core. Legally, the
subject property lies within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Base Meridian as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS
Topographic Quadrangle (fig. 2).
The 2.92 -acre study area is identified as APN 377 - 350 -004. The elongated parcel is
oriented northeast- southwest and topographically defined by two hilltops which include the
surviving buildings of the ranch complex (fig. 3). Vacant land in the form of numerous foothills
transected by off -road trails border the property on the north, east and south. The western
boundary is delineated by the paved frontage road for Interstate 15, Camino Del Norte.
Originally, the Delaney Ranch comprised numerous buildings and structures spread over
258 +acres of fairly rugged terrain. Additional parcels (APNs 377 - 350 -008, -009, and —10)
included a caretaker's house, workshop and garage, car barn, stables, hay barn, milk shed,
chicken coops and pig styes (figs. 4 and 5). The perimeter of the original ranch boundaries is
delineated by 6 -foot chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire.
III. A BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF LAKE ELSINORE
Much of the historical data regarding Lake Elsinore was drawn from archival research
conducted at the Lake Elsinore Branch Library and the Tomas Rivera Library at the University
of California at Riverside. The single most important source of information was Tom Hudson's
Lake Elsinore Valley, Its Story 1776 -1977 (1978). This history of the Elsinore Valley contains a
convenient outline for the social and economic development of Lake Elsinore and its environs.
A second useful anthology of historic anecdotes may be found in Elizabeth C. James' Elsinore
History Vignettes (1973). Other anecdotal historical accounts were published in the local history
magazine, The High Country. Lastly, some invaluable sources on places in Riverside County
include Jane Gunther's Riverside County Place Names, their Origins & their Stories (1984) and
Byron & Son's History and Directory of Riverside County 1893 -4. (1992). Collectively, these
works provide a reasonably thorough background history of the region.
3
9¢ii �.rl C C . K ...
!
1Al
s '' Nli?Rl
i
S'CUllY
AREA"'
t
rJl
d � ,� '� • � c � } : 4 ti (,'yr � ' t r t� �l d t:Y4�tll+
tif� i
"7c=. is ' •r i
yY
IZ
1 O h A R E i \ n x nw
`+ I ii000lie Home
P
t+ _
1
i(WMfMS
Figure 2. Study area as shown on a portion of the Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle (1997).
4
Figure 3. Study area as shown on aerial photograph.
A. Rancho Days
In spite of its lake and hot springs, the Elsinore Valley was relatively slow to attract the
attention of Europeans. In 1797, Fray Juan Santiago set out from Mission San Juan Capistrano
in search of a new mission site. He and his party traveled past Lake Elsinore, and probably
camped there, on their way to Temecula. They went on to identify the future site of Mission San
Luis Rey.
According to Hudson, the first pioneer settlement in the region did not take place in the
region until 1818 when Leandro Serrano, former rnajordomo at the Pala chapel, settled in
Temescal Canyon (ibid. 6f). By 1824, Leandro had built an adobe north of Glen Ivy Hot
Springs and this is believed to have been the first private dwelling to be built in what is now
Riverside County. Meanwhile, an asistencia had been built at Temecu (Temecula). Lake
Elsinore itself, however, remained in the exclusive hands of its aboriginal occupants.
For the next twenty years, the only white men to visit the lake were travelers passing
through the Elsinore Valley. Finally, in 1844, Julian Mamriquez received a grant to the "Laguna
Grande" or Lake Elsinore. The grant, which encompassed the lake, included some 20,000 acres.
However, Manriquez seems never to have settled the place and, after several years, sold it to
Abel Stearns who regarded the rancho as a real estate investment. In 1858, Stearns sold it to Don
Agustin Machado. The Machados were the first family of European descent to settle along the
shores of the lake.
Machado was a ranchero and although there are no precise records, he doubtless hired
many Luiseno to help run the rancho. The Machados immediately began building an adobe near
what was the intersection of Machado Sheet and Grand Avenue (ibid. 9, 14). Today, as the
result of road modifications, the location of the adobe is best described as situated at the curve
that transitions Grand Avenue to Riverside Drive. That same year, the first Butterfield stage
stopped at the Machado rancho. There, the passengers dined and the horses were changed before
the stage continued its journey to San Francisco. The Machado home became a bi- weekly stage
stop for the next two years, service finally being terminated as a result of the Civil War.
Don Agustin Machado died in 1865, leaving portions of the rancho to his son Juan and to
his second wife and her eleven children. During the ensuing eight years, all of the heirs except
Juan sold their shares of the rancho. Don Juan Machado built an adobe on his pie- shaped 500 -
acre parcel at the northwest corner of the lake. There, he raised a family and continued to build
rt
the herds of livestock begun by his father. Don Juan Machado's "Rancho Laguna Grande"
became the social center for the local ranches at "rodeo" (round -up) time and was well -known
for his historical reminisces and the man who first planted Australian eucalyptus trees in the area
(Sumner in James 1973:66ff.).
But the future of the lake as the site of pastoral ranches was short. A severe drought
struck California in the late 1870's and by 1881, the lake was nearly dry. In that year, Franklin
H. Heald, who was to become the founder of the City of Lake Elsinore, first visited the lake.
B. Development of the Town of Elsinore
Although it was little more than a mud flat at the time, the visionary Franklin H. Heald
fell in love with the location. He soon learned that the Rancho La Laguna could be purchased
from the London and San Francisco Bank for its mortgage of $24,000.
Heald lacked the purchase price himself so in 1883 he took two partners, Donald Graham
and William Collier. Meanwhile, the California Southern completed its rail line from National
City to Colton. Since the railroad would connect with the Santa Fe and points east in 1885, it
appeared that the time for development of the lake had finally arrived. In 1884, the name
"Elsinore" was selected for the new town, not after the small city in Denmark, "but rather from
the immortality given it by Shakespeare and Campbell, and because it had a pleasant sound."
The name on the sign of the little railroad station located at the present intersection of Railroad
Canyon Road and Mission Trail was changed from "Laguna" to "Elsinore."
About that time, the first bath was built at the hot spring located at the intersection of
Graham Avenue and Spring Street. Plans were laid for a hotel and the town site subdivision,
which was located entirely east of Main Street, was surveyed by H.C. Kellogg. Mineral rights
under the streets were retained by the subdividers. Town lots were offered for sale at $45 each
and farm lots for $25 each. In 1884, the new town consisted of a "general store, three or four
small houses, and a few tents" (ibid. 27).
However, southern California's land boom was gaining strength and reached fever pitch
during the next several years as a result of a passenger price war between the Santa Fe and
Southern Pacific. Elsinore's population began to grow accordingly. At the same time, Heald
was busy pursuing his plans to make the town a resort. By 1887, Heald had begun construction
of the famous Crescent Bath House which was intended to represent the epitome of oriental
7
luxury in southern California. The venture was successful and the new bath house later became
an adjunct of the Lake View Hotel (when it became known as the Lake View Bath Houses).
Today, the old bath house still stands as the "Chimes" Antique Store. It was added to the
National Register of Historic Places in 1975.
The southern California real estate bubble finally burst in 1888 as buyers evaporated and
prices plummeted. Some new town subdivisions went under but Elsinore was able to survive,
principally because its economic base was surprisingly diverse for such a small and new
community. Aside from the bath house business, coal had been found in several locations not far
from town (Collier in James 1973:30ff.). In addition, clay suitable for manufacture of bricks and
other ceramic construction materials had been discovered near the coal vein in Warm Springs
Valley. The "suburban" town of Terra Cotta was subsequently laid out and, in 1887, received its
own Post Office (Hudson 1978:32).
C. City of Elsinore (1888 -1928)
The City of Elsinore was incorporated on April 9, 1888. During the ensuing lean
economic years, the clay products business in Terra Cotta helped to sustain the new town.
During the early 1890's, the California Coal and Clay Company at Terra Cotta was shipping
seven carloads of pipe per week. "In 1892 the plant manufactured ten miles of square groove
tiles to be used for underground telephone wires in Los Angeles" (ibid. 33). Clay products
manufactured at Terra Cotta continued to support the local economy throughout the century up
until 1940 when the Pacific Clay Products Company finally abandoned Terra Cotta in favor of
Alberhill.
One final important event took place prior to the turn -of -the- century remains to be noted.
In 1897, the town got its first municipal water system. In the past, residents had depended upon
backyard wells and used sulphur water delivered in barrels to do laundry (sulphur water being
excellent for the purpose). The new water system consisted of a well drilled at the north end of
Langstaff Street, a pipe leading from the well to a reservoir on a nearby hilltop, and distribution
system leading from the reservoir to the town's residential and business districts. The Langstaff
Street well produced warm sulphur water. "That was the beginning of Elsinore's famed mineral
water system that for many years delivered the controversial water to every household" (Hudson
1978:37).
8
During the first decade of the 20`" century, Elsinore took on the character of a quiet little
agricultural community. Truck farming and orchards became important elements in the local
economy. Olive growing was another important agricultural activity. C.H. Albers, owner of the
Lakeland Ranch on the south side of the lake and for whom Alberhill was named, constructed a
pressing, pickling, and canning plant at what is now Lakeland Village.
Agricultural and mining activities continued to flourish in Elsinore right up to WWI
although Albers moved his olive pressing plant to Riverside in 1917. However, by about 1913,
land subdivision and construction were once again becoming economically significant activities.
New stores began to go up on Main Street in 1913 and construction of the first lakeshore resort,
the Superior Land and Water Company's "Laguna Vista Club House," began the following year.
Earlier in 1912, the same company had subdivided "Ford" on the east side of the lake, a tract
which later became the Sedco Hills (acronym for South Elsinore Development Company).
The Lakedale Hotel was built at the corner of Spring and Limited Streets and burned to
the ground in 1894. It was immediately rebuilt as the Lake View Hotel, also known as the Lake
View Inn, which stood for almost 75 years before it was razed in 1970. About 1921, the
Temescal Water Company was laying plans to divert water from the San Jacinto River in
Railroad Canyon to farmers in Corona. Ernest Pickering, successful developer of "Ocean Park"
next to Santa Monica, had a financial interest in the Lake View Inn and bathhouse project. He
objected to the water district's plans for obvious reasons and assembled a citizen's opposition
group. Undaunted, Temescal applied to the State Water Commission for a permit.
It was six years before the courts made a compromise decision in favor of Temescal. In
the settlement, which is known as the "Tilley Agreement," Temescal was permitted to build a
dam in Railroad Canyon. Temescal was also permitted to take the first 2,000 acre feet of water
flowing into the drainage in any one year. Depending upon the level of Lake Elsinore, it was
permitted to take additional amounts up to 100 %. The agreement did not attract as much
resentment from the citizens of Elsinore as one might suppose, apparently because the level of
the lake happened to be high at the time.
The 1920's were prosperous years for Elsinore. The Corona - Elsinore Road was
completed in 1924 and the following year, plans were laid for what would become the Ortega
Ilighway connecting Elsinore with San Juan Capistrano on the coast. A number of subdivisions
were completed, the most important of which was Clevelin Realty Corporation's development of
go
Country Club Heights. By 1928, Clevelin was buying pipe "by the mile" for water and
underground electrical service in the posh new residential area. Country Club I3eights' most
celebrated resident was the evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson who built the palatial Aimee's
Castle."
D. Modern Lake Elsinore (1940- Present)
During WW 11, Elsinore became the site of a Douglas Aircraft Corporation plant where
wings for B -17 bombers were manufactured. At its peak, Douglas was employing 500 hundred
people at its new plant. "Housewives and older men were taught to operate drill presses, and for
the first time in their lives Elsinore women went off to work wearing pants and carrying lunch
buckets" (Ibid. 97). Before the war, the Metropolitan Water District had begun digging a tunnel
through the San Jacinto Mountains (today, this tunnel delivers Colorado River water to much of
southern California). However, to everyone's surprise, ground water rapidly filled the tunnel and
flowed into the San Jacinto River. Temescal attempted to claim this water as "vagrant" but
Elsinore won a suit claiming it as part of the natural flow of the river that belonged to the lake.
During the war, Metropolitan diverted the tunnel water to Lake Mathews. In 1944, Mr.
Nat McKee, new owner of the old Crescent Bath house and Aimee's Castle, became interested in
the problem. McKee organized the Elsinore Water Protective Association for the purpose of
pressing a claim for a share of the tunnel water and to recover some of the water lost as a result
of the Tilley Agreement. Although their initial suit was never carried through due to lack of
funds, the Association's efforts ultimately resulted in the creation of the Eastern Municipal
Water District (EMWD) which continued to press the claim for tunnel water. In 1950, the
EMWD became a branch of the huge Metropolitan Water District (MWD) but with the proviso
that all tunnel water would be managed by the EMWD. Unfortunately for Elsinore, the EMWD
did not plan to distribute water in the Elsinore Valley. There was talk of legal proceedings but
nothing ever came of it.
Development had begun to pick up following the war, particularly at Lakeland Village on
the southwest side of the lake. But although no one could have been aware of it at the time, the
lake had begun to dry up. In 1948, the fish began dying and washing ashore and residents
suffered from a plague of gnats spawned as a result of the lake's low water level. Although there
10
was substantial rain in 1952, the gnat infestation problem repeated itself when the lake went
completely dry in 1954.
Meanwhile the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) which had been
formed in 1950, was considering joining the Eastern Municipal Water District in order to
become eligible to receive Colorado River water. But heavy rains came in 1954 and the voters
west of the EMWD boundary voted in favor of formation of their own area -wide Western
Municipal Water District. That same year, the Western Municipal Water District became part of
the Metropolitan Water District and, therefore, became eligible for Colorado River water. The
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District was given the responsibility of distributing the new
water.
While Elsinore and the state were struggling over the public water supply, the lake had
gone completely dry. In 1962, the state legislature budgeted for money to put Colorado River
water into the lake. This event took place in 1964 using MWD water from its aqueduct at
Lakeview. Water from the aqueduct flowed down the San Jacinto River, down Railroad Canyon,
and into the desiccated lake. However, by 1966 it had become clear this enterprise could not be
satisfactorily sustained due to a pervasive drought and increasing demand for domestic water.
At the end of the year, three 1800 -foot wells were drilled for the purpose of providing water to
the lake. Aside from rains, these wells have been the lake's exclusive source of water ever since.
In 1972, the name of the town was changed to "Lake Elsinore" by popular vote. During
the 1970's and 80's Lake Elsinore and its neighboring towns continued to develop. Completion
of interstate 15 encouraged commuters to adopt Lake Elsinore as a "bedroom community."
Shopping centers have been built near the mouth of Railroad Canyon and large residential areas
have grown up in the nearby communities of Canyon Lake, Sun City, Wildomar, Murrieta, and
Temecula. Although the days of the bath houses are over, the lake still draws many weekend
visitors.
D. Lake Elsinore Celebritv Homeowners and Visitors
According to Ms. Jean Corral, local historian and long time resident of Lake Elsinore,
over the past century, several celebrities are known to have lived or vacationed in the Lake
Elsinore area. Some of the most notable included: 1) the family of 1920s child star, Jackie
Coogan, 2) weekend visitor and Elsinore property owner Bela Lugosi (1930s), 3) Dorothy
Cottrell, author of "Singing Gold," and 4) 1910s silent screen western actor, William S. Hart,
owned a house locally where he vacationed in during the summer (Rathbun 2005).
Often regarded as the most famous and glamorous Lake Elsinore resident was the
evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson, founder of the International Church of the Foursquare
Gospel. In 1929, she had the palatial retreat known as "Aimee's Castle" constructed for her.
This Moorish -style castle with mosaic ceilings overlooks Lake Elsinore and comprises six
bedrooms, five baths, prayer tower, and underground catacombs. Ms. McPherson died in 1944
but her castle still stands today (ibid.).
Other celebrities and movie stars known to have visited or vacationed at Elsinore in the
1920s included Will Rogers (humorist) and Carrie Jacobs Bond (composer and lyricist). 1930s
and 1940s stars included Frank Morgan, Clark Gable and Andy Devine, and Olympic swimmer
turn actor, Johnny Weissmuller (Williams 2009). Actor Steve McQueen was a frequent visitor in
the 1960s and 1970s while on his many motorcycle excursions throughout southern California.
He also participated in the Lake Elsinore Grand Prix and co- produced the locally filmed
motorcycle documentary "On Any Sunday." (Rathbun 2005, Ghiotto 2011).
IV. HISTORIC RESOURCE LISTINGS
A. Historic Resources Records Search
A records search of the study area was conducted by Laura White at the Eastern
Information Center (EIC), University of California at Riverside. The search entailed a review of
all previously recorded historic resources situated within the project area. Additionally, the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), California
Points of Historical Interest (CPHI), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and
the California Directory of Properties (DOP, aka the Historic Resources Inventory [IIRI]) were
reviewed for the purpose of identifying historic properties.
The results of the search indicated that no listed National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), California Historical Landmarks
(CHL), or California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) properties have been recorded within
the study area. However, the California DOP does list the property address (523 West Minthorn
Street, Lake Elsinore) as an historic resource (Primary #33 -7228; Appendix B).
12
The study area was recorded by Pat Meredith of the Riverside County Historical
Commission in 1982. The site form describes the residence at 523 West Minthorn Street as a
6,500 square foot Mediterranean /Spanish Revival style home that is U- shaped in plan with a
courtyard. Other features include a Spanish -tile gabled roof, stucco siding over 18 -inch adobe
walls, double -hung windows, an arched entry, and milk shed with cooling tower. An associated
gabled- roofed gazebo, Olympic -sized swimming pool, and a cabana with five dressing rooms
and two restrooms are located on an adjacent hilltop. All of the above - mentioned buildings and
structures are located within the elongated, 2.92 -acre parcel identified as APN 377 - 350 -004.
Other ranch related features (sheds, corrals, and stables) for livestock are located further to the
east within APN 377 - 350 -008.
Ms. Meredith stated that the residential complex dated to 1928 and that the builder was
A.J. Delaney. With regard to significance, the style, size and components to the residential
complex contributed to it being recognized as "one of the best examples of
Mediterranean /Spanish style homes built in the late 1920's building boom. Its gazebo, cabana,
and Olympic -sized swimming pool make it unique in the Lake Elsinore Valley." (Meredith
1982). The DOP listing indicates that the 523 West Minthorn Street address has been assigned
the California Historic Resources Status Code of (3S) "Appears eligible for NR (National
Register) as an individual property through survey evaluation."
Sources consulted for the resource included Tom Hudson's Lake Elsinore Valley, its
story 1776-1977(1978). Within Chapter 9 of his book on "Palatial Homes and Spas 1928-1932",
Hudson made the brief statement "Among others are the spacious home built by A.J. Delaney on
a hill at the head of Main Street "... To date, this is the sole published reference to the property.
While conducting the initial survey in 1981, the Riverside County Historical Commission
was given a copy of "Description of the Property and Investment Objectives" for the 246 -acre
West Minthorn Street property by real estate broker, Gregory A. Block of Bitkower Associates,
Inc. on behalf of the property owner, Missing Link 11.
Situated upon the land is a 6,500 square foot, 43 year old
Spanish mansion, with an Olympic size swimming pool, cabanas
and gazebo, as well as approximately 20 horse corrals, sheds and
stables. The home itself is in excellent condition but is in need of
some exterior painting. Structurally, it is constructed of 18" thick
block -adobe walls. It is equipped with an industrial kitchen,
13
including a full line of stainless steel sinks, freezer, refrigerators
and a butcher block food prep area—The Seller currently resides in
the mansion, but will vacate it upon closing of escrow of our
purchase (Bitkower Realtors 1981:6).
Investment objectives of the Partnership included the possible conversion of the
residence into a fine restaurant, in the nature of a "Cask `N Cleaver" or "Stuart Anderson" type
of establishment. Copies of the Primary record for 523 West Minthorn Street, the "Description
of the Property and Investment Objectives" and black and white photos taken during the survey
of the property were generously provided by Mr. Keith Herron, Resources Bureau Chief,
Riverside County Parks and Open Space District.
B. Citv of Lake Elsinore Historical Resources
Section 4.7 (Historic Preservation) of the 2011 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan was
reviewed for Cultural and Historic Resources. Under the City's Historic Built Environment
Category, the Delaney Estate (located north of Lake Elsinore) is listed as an "Unofficially
Recognized Significant Historic Resource." Other buildings listed under the same heading
include: Aimee's Castle, The Machado Adobe and Butterfield Stage Stop, Alberhill School, The
Cannery, and Elsinore Naval Military Academy (General Plan 2011:6f).
V. HISTORICAL SOCIETY CORRESPONDENCE
In an effort to learn more about the architectural /historical importance of 523 West
Minthorn Street property, a letter of inquiry was sent to Ms. Ruth Atkins, President of the Lake
Elsinore Historical Society (Appendix C). On May 6, 2013 a letter response was received. To
summarize, Ms. Atkins stated that the historical society had nothing in their files on the
Minthorn Street address. However, they do know of several locals "who swear they know this
property belonged to Johnny Weissmuller or refer to it as Tarzan's House." The time he
supposedly visited the Lake Elsinore area was in the years after he participated in the Olympic
Games and at the beginning of his movie career." Furthermore, "Everything we know about it is
hearsay and cannot be verified." (Atkins 2013:pers. comm.).
Telecommunications with community historian Ms. Jean Corral, long time resident of
Lake Elsinore (since 1964), and a member of the Historical Society resulted in a similar finding.
14
She had no specific historical or architectural knowledge to offer on the 523 W. Minthorn Street
residence. Furthermore, what information she had heard about Johnny Weissmuller was now
hearsay as these informants have all passed away (Corral 2013:pers. comm.).
VI. LAND PATENTS
Archival research also included a review of land patents on file with the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) in their Moreno Valley office. The subject parcel is situated within the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of fractional Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Base Meridian. BLM General Land Office records indicate that two land patents
have been recorded for the study area. The first patent, which covers all of Section 5, was issued
to Abel Stearns in 1851 as part of the larger, 13,337.84 acre La Laguna Rancho. The acreage
was acquired under authority of the Spanish/Mexican Land Grant dated March 3, 1851 (9 Stat.
631). The patent is recorded as Document # Plc 495 (Accession # CACAAA 083219).
The second patent comprising 40 acres (Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5)
was issued to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company. It was part of 71,268.54 acres acquired
under the authority of the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Grant of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292).
The land patent is recorded as Document #23, Accession # CACAAA 072835.
VII. HISTORIC MAP RESEARCH
Historic maps of the Lake Elsinore area were also reviewed for the purpose of identifying
locations of potential historic resources. This included an examination of the 1880 U.S. General
Land Office (GLO) plat map for Township 6 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base
Meridian on file with the California Desert District office of the U.S. Bureau of Land
Management located in Moreno Valley. Several United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps
on file in the Map Room of the Science Library at the University of California at Riverside were
also inspected. These included: 1) the 1901 Elsinore 30' USGS Quadrangle (surveyed 1897 -98),
the 1942 Lake Elsinore 15' Quadrangle (Corps. of Engineers, U.S. Army, War Department), and
the 1953 Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangle.
Other maps consulted included a 200 -scale map dated 1972 for Section 5, Township 6
South, Range 4 West, SBBM that was acquired from the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District. The 1925 -1933 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map for Elsinore,
15
Riverside County (digital version) was also reviewed on -line from the San Diego Public Library.
Unfortunately, the property lay just outside the map coverage area. All information gleaned
from the various maps is presented below.
An inspection of the General Land Office Plat Map for Township 6 South, Range 4 West
shows the lake and portion of Abel Stearns' Rancho La Laguna. In addition, a dirt road is
indicated paralleling the north side of the San Jacinto River through what is today Railroad
Canyon. Section 5 (location of study area) as well as several adjoining sections is illustrated as
being quite hilly. It appears to include five government lots (1 through 5) that range in size
between 25 -30 acres. Remaining section land is divided into 40, 80 and 160 acre parcels. No
structures or man -made features are delineated within the study area.
A review of the 1901 Elsinore 30' USGS Quadrangle indicates that the core of Elsinore is
well - established with a well - developed grid of roads and streets. The California Southern
Railroad is shown extending through Railroad Canyon. Also indicated between Elsinore
Junction and Alberhill is California Southern's Elsinore - Alberhill railroad spur line which was a
direct result of the coal and clay operations in the area. No structures or man -made features are
delineated within the study area.
The 1942 Lake Elsinore 15' U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, War Dept. Quadrangle
indicates the same conditions as the 1901 Elsinore map but with the addition of more extensive
roads and additional development. The new community of North Elsinore has also been
established northeast of the City. Portions of Route 71, Route 74 and Highway 395 are indicated
along Lakeshore Drive, Central Avenue, and Mission Trail. Nearby Railroad Canyon Dam and
Railroad Canyon Reservoir are also depicted. As the California Southern Railroad tracks were
abandoned through Railroad Canyon in 1935, they are no longer illustrated. However, the
aforementioned spur line has now been replaced with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe line.
Situated just north of the end of Main Street, the 1942 map shows the hills of the study
area covered by a myriad of dirt roads. However, no structures of any kind are delineated on the
property although they were certainly present at the time. This is not surprising as on numerous
occasions, government maps (specifically U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) have chosen to
excluded certain building locations from their war department maps.
A review of the 1953 Lake Elsinore 7.5' USGS Topographic Quadrangles show that
conditions have not significantly changed since publication of the 1942 Lake Elsinore map. The
16
region is composed of scattered rural development with a higher concentration in the urban core
of Elsinore. The road system through the area continues to expand with both new and improved
roads /streets. An inspection of the study area continues to show a pattern of dirt roads
connecting the various hilltops over the entire, 258 +acre Delaney Ranch property. However,
unlike the previous map, this one clearly shows the location of the main house and pool (labeled
"swimming pool ").
The 1972 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation map for Section 5,
Township 6 South, Range 4 West is the best and most informative of all the maps. The 200 -
scale map, clearly delineates the specific locations of the various buildings and structures that
were spread out across the entire 258 -acre Delaney Ranch property (fig. 4). For accuracy, Ms.
White consulted with Mr. Reed Webb (son of Serveo Ranches partner, E. Ray Webb) for the
labeling of each building /structure location. As a comparison today, one can see the livestock
area was situated quite a distance to the east of the house (in recently quarried canyon, figure 5).
Flies must have been one consideration. In any event, the map is also important as it shows the
site of the former ranch caretaker's house (at the base of hill).
VIII. PROPERTY HISTORY
Research on the history of the subject property was conducted at the County of Riverside
Robert J. Fitch Archives in Moreno Valley and the adjacent Riverside County Assessor- Clerk-
Recorder office. Specific data procured from these County facilities included: 1) Property
ownership entries from 1920 -1970 Lot Books, 2) Grantee - Grantor records, and 3) pertinent
deeds. In addition, the history sections of the Riverside Public Library (main library) and the
Lake Elsinore Branch Library were examined. Specific sources consulted included literary
works by Tom Hudson (Lake Elsinore Valley, its story 1776 -1977 [1978]) and Elizabeth C.
James (Elsinore History Vignettes [1973]). The Elsinore Leader -Press newspaper was also
inspected (in microfilm format) for the years 1928 -1932 as was the Index to the collection of
Tom Patterson's "Out of the County's Past" column from the Press - Enterprise (dated 1978-
1996). Other news /history magazines (The High Country and La Laguna Revue) were also
consulted.
17
\ -TIT l
..a
I IT
IT
IT-
1 ¢ 1
�1ll�4rJ t ✓/.
2- Hit t
IT
o
it
IT
IV
If
IT
c'
{ }
tiT
IAAIT
~ _
A c k- (
/gyp
Figure 4. 1972 Rivet-side County Flood Control and Water Conservation Map of Section 5, Township 6
South, Range 4 West showing locations of various buildings and structures located within the Delaney
Ranch complex (200 -scale map).
18
Figure 5. Recent aerial showing former locations of ranch building and struchn'es.
19
Supplemental information was drawn from city directories and online databases (U.S.
Federal Census records, California Voter Registration (1900- 1968), California Death Index from
1940 -1997, the Social Security Death Index) accessed through Ancestry.conv. Lastly, valuable
information was obtained through interviews with relatives of the previous ranch owners. These
included Mr. H. Reed Webb, Mr. Jon Westerlund, and Mr. Roy J. Horton.
A. Compilation of Parcels by the Hahn Family
Unlike most properties within Riverside County, no early tract maps were found for the
study area. However, as previously indicated in the land patent section of the report (Section
Vi), after forming a part of the Rancho La Laguna, the Southern Pacific Land Company was
granted portions of Section 5. During the 1920s, the Elsinore (now Lake Elsinore) area was
becoming a popular vacation destination primarily due to its recreational lake and mineral baths.
Consequently, families came looking to buy investment property.
In 1923, John Hahn of Los Angeles purchased Government Lots 3 (26.90 ac.) and Lot 4
(26.11 ac.) in the eastern foothills of Section 5 overlooking the lake from the railroad. Within a
few short years, he had acquired an additional 205+ acres of contiguous property (see Table 1).
According to the 1910 U.S. Federal Census, John Hahn was born in Germany in 1870 and
immigrated to the United States in 1895. California Voter Registration (1900 -1968) for Los
Angeles County indicated that Mr. Halm was trained as an Engineer. He and his wife, Johanne
(also from Germany and a dressmaker) resided at 1338 E. 56r" Street in Los Angeles.
However, just as fast as the Hahns acquired parcels, they were selling them. This began
with Mr. Hahn selling off Government Lots 3 and 4 in 1926. Subsequently, Mrs. Hahn was
forced to sell the remaining acreage (200± acres) following her husband's death. This property
was also conveyed to A.J. Delaney of Long Beach.
B. A.J. Delaney and the 258+ Acre Elsinore Ranch
Arthur Joy Delaney was a native of West Virginia. He was born in the community of
Wetzel in 1883 and was the eldest of three children born to Wesley and Mary Criswell Delaney
(1900 U.S. Census). Presumably, Arthur received an education in West Virginia as he remained
there at least to the age of 17 (ibid.). Subsequently, he married Golda Pearl Long of Pine Grove,
West Virginia. The couple ventured west to southern California circa 1905. The 1910 U.S.
20
Census indicated that they were living on Gilmore Lane in Cahuenga, Los Angeles County with
their first child, Norma Delaney and Arthur was a manager of an oil company. His 1917 -1918
Draft Registration Card indicates that he was a resident of Montebello and was employed as an
oil worker for Petroleum Industry Company of Los Angeles.
Table 1. Property ownership records from 1923 -1929
Date
Lot /Parcel
Book/Page
Owners
Land
Buildings
Acreaee
Value
Value
1923 -25
3
17/24
John Hahn
- --
- - --
26.90ac
"
4
17/24
John Hahn
- --
- - --
26.11 ac.
1926 -29
3
17/23
A. J. Delaney
- --
- - --
26.90ac
"
4
17/23
A. J. Delaney
- --
- - --
26.11 ac
1926 -27
1
17/23
John Hahn
- --
- - --
28.43ac.
2
17/23
John Hahn
- --
- - --
27.66ac.
"
5
17/23
John Hahn
- --
- - --
29.76ac.
"
S1 /2NE1 /4
17/23
John Hahn
- --
- - --
80.00ac.
"
SEl /4NW1 /4
17/23
John Hahn
- --
- - --
40.00ac.
1928 -29
1
17/23
Johanne Hahn
80
- - --
28.43ac.
"
2
17/23
Johanne Hahn
40
- - --
27.66ac.
"
5
17/23
Johanne Hahn
450
- - --
29.76ac.
"
Sl /2NE1/4
17/23
Johanne Hahn
240
- - --
80.00ac.
"
SE IAN W1 /4
17/23
Johannelahn
120
- - --
40.00ac.
By 1920, the Delaney family was complete with four children (Norma, Louis, Doris, and
Patricia). Arthur met continued success in the oil business and the Delaneys moved to Long
Beach (Cherry Avenue and then Atlantic Avenue). In the early 1920s, Perry Vandervort was
partners with Arthur in the oil refinery business on Signal Hill (Independent Press - Telegram
1960). On November 10, 1926, the Delaney Petroleum Corporation was incorporated with a
registered address of 695 Last 27`x' Street, Room 5, Long Beach (California Secretary of State
2013a). City directories indicate that A.J. Delaney was president of the corporation with J.R.
Covington serving as secretary and treasurer.
By 1930, Mr. A.J. Delaney had purchased all 258.86 acres from the Hahn family which
included: Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.)
Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the
Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM (Table 2). It is
21
believed that Mr. Delaney was the property owner who had the entire property professionally
fenced. Most likely it was erected prior to the construction of the main house.
According to County records, there is no building activity noted between 1930 -1934
within the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 where the ranch house is located. The first time a
building value appears is in 1935 with a value of $480. Between 1936 -1938, this is followed by
a value of $11530. Therefore, it is believed that that although A.J. Delaney owned the properly
in 1930, the ranch house was not under construction until five years later in 1935 (see table).
This information was confirmed with Mr. James Hofer, Archives Manager of the Robert J. Fitch
Archives (see Table 2).
Table 2. Property ownership records fi-om 1930 -1946.
Date Lot/Parcel Book/Page Owners Land Buildings Acreage
Value Value
1930 -31 1
17/23
A.J. Delaney
80
- - --
28.43ac.
" 2
17/23
A.J. Delaney
40
- - --
27.66ac.
" 3
17/23
A.J. Delaney
130
390
26.90ac.
" 4
17/23
A.J. Delaney
130
6000
26.11 ac.
" 5
17/23
A.J. Delaney
600
1600
29.76ac.
" S1 /2NE1/4
17/23
A.J. Delaney
240
- - --
80.00ac.
" SEl /4NW1 /4
17/23
A.J. Delaney
240
- - --
40.00ac.
1932 -35 1
17/23
A.J. Delaney
105
- - --
28.43ac.
" 2
17/23
AI Delaney
255
- - --
27.66ac.
" 3
17/23
A.J. Delaney
180
1725
26.90ac.
" 4
17/23
A.J. Delaney
180
8925
26.11 ac.
" 5
17/23
A.J. Delaney
810
2175
29.76ac.
" Sl /2NE1 /4
17/23
A.J. Delaney
165
- - --
80.00ac.
" SEl /4NW1 /4
17/23
A.LDelaney
330
480*
40.00ac
1936 -46 1
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
100
- - --
28.43ac.
" 2
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
250
- - --
27.66ac.
" 3
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
180
2120
2690ac.
" 4
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
180
- - --
26.11 ac.
" 5
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
810
2200
29.76ac.
" Sl /2NE1 /4
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Corp.
160
810
80.00ac.
" SEIANW1 /4
17/23
Delaney Petroleum Cot
330
11530*
40.00ac.
* building values indicating presence of ranch house
22
Arthur Joy Delaney died in Torrance in November of 1955. His son, Louis A. `Bud"
Delaney followed on in his father's footsteps and was both Vice President of the Delaney
Petroleum Corporation and Secretary /Treasurer of Halo Oil Producers, Inc. in Long Beach
(Independent Press- Telegram 1958).
According to Roy Horton, the Elsinore ranch property was used as a second home or
summer house for the Delaney family. Although Arthur Delaney's wife thought it was too
rustic, Roy's mother loved the ranch (Horton 2013:pers.comm.). After all, it was where Roy's
mother Patricia Joy Delaney (youngest daughter of Arthur and Golda Delaney) met his father
Wesley R. Horton. Patricia or "Patsy" would often ride the ranch horses down to Elsinore High
School and watch Wesley during football practice. They soon became sweethearts. Wesley was
18 and Patsy was 15 (Horton 2013:pers. comm.).
After graduating from Elsinore High School, Arthur Delaney gave Wesley ajob as an oil
worker in the Delaney oil fields. This was while Patsy was finishing her education at
Polytechnic High School in Long Beach. Roy said that his mother had her own driver that would
take her to and from high school every day. Eventually, Wesley Horton tired of the oil business
and announced that he wanted to become a mortician. This news did not go over well with
Patsy's family. According to Roy, there was "no way Arthur Delaney's youngest daughter was
going to marry a mortician." (ibid.). Instead, Wesley was encouraged to try banking and started
out as an Assistant Cashier at Fanners & Merchants Bank in Long Beach. This led him to
pursue a career in banking where he became Vice President and Manager of the Fanners &
Merchants Bank. Wesley R. Horton died in 2011 followed by Patricia Delaney Horton in April
of 2013. Both are buried in the Elsinore Valley Cemetery in Lake Elsinore (Long Beach Press-
Telegram 2013).
C. The Frey Family
In 1947, the Delaney Petroleum Corporation sold Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2
(27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township
6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM to Carl C. Frey and his wife Blanche A. Frey. The couple only
owned the property for two years (1947- 1948). U.S. City Directories for the South Pasadena
area indicated that Carl Frey was a Designer between 1938 -1940. The 1940 U.S. Federal Census
23
listed Carl as "Head Designer." In 1946 they moved to Burbank and by 1952 they were living in
Phoenix, Arizona. It is believed that Carl Clarence Frey died in Butte County in October of 1959
(California Death Index, 1940 - 1997). His widow, Blanche continued to live in Chico, Butte
County, California until her death.
D. Carter and Green
For the years 1949 -1951, the property owners of Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2
(27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township
6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM were Richard A. Carter and Roy C. Green. Unfortunately, no
real information about the partners could be found. The only reference to Roy C. Green was a
1947 Santa Ana City Directory. Listed under the Spouse category is the name "G.G. Sanitarium
Green."
E. The Atkinson Family
For one brief year (1952) George E. Atkinson, Jr. and his wife Alice were the listed
property owners of Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.), Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4
(26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2
of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM. The 1951
City Directory for Long Beach indicated that Mr. Atkinson was an attorney residing on
California Avenue. Sometime in the early 1990s, the family moved to Paramount. In an
interview with Mr. Reed Webb, he stated that he was familiar with the Long Beach attorney's
name (Webb 2013:pers. comm.).
F. Partnership of Webb, Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note /Servco
Between 1947 -1948, a company known as Servco of Long Beach was formed by four
partners: E. Ray Webb, Paul Westerlund, Raymond Malian, and Charles O. Van Note. Each
individual brought their expertise to the partnership. Mr. Westerlund was an Attorney, E. Ray
Webb was a Mechanical Engineer, Mr. Malian had a Ph.D. in Chemistry, and Mr. Van Note was
a Petroleum Engineer.
24
The four partners developed a specialized drilling collar for the petroleum industry
fashioned from an alloy of nickel, copper and aluminum known as K Monel. This nonmagnetic
alloy was age- hardenable and could be heat- treated after finishing to produce a material that was
both corrosion- resistant and extra strong. It was useful to the oil industry in that it could be used
as a drilling collar that housed instruments necessary for directional drilling. The drill collar was
patented by The Servco Company (Patent number 3476415 was patented on November 4, 1969;
Charles O. Van Note- Inventor). It was an expensive item that was leased to drilling companies.
Serveo was eventually purchased by Smith International in 1968 (Webb 2013:pers. comm.).
In the early 1950s, the Servco partners (dba Servco Ranches) were looking for investment
property in Arizona but settled on Elsinore in Riverside County. The lake was completely dry at
that time and as a result property was quite cheap. According to Mr. Webb, the property was
purchased from the "Rockwood School For Boys" (ibid.). However, a review of the Grant Deed
clearly indicates that in 1953, the 258 -acre property comprising Government Lot 1 (28.43 ac.),
Lot 2 (27.66 ac.), Lot 3 (26.90 ac.), Lot 4 (26.11 ac.) Lot 5 (29.76 ac.), the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 (40 acres), and the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 (80 ac.) of Section 5, Township
6 South, Range 4 West, SBBM was transferred directly to the partners from the Atkinsons. No
reference to the Boys School could be found.
In 1955 the partners formed The Servco Foundation, a domestic nonprofit corporation
(California Secretary of State 2013b). Three years later, they carved out the 2.92 -acre parcel that
appears today and what is referred as the study area. The legal description is "Beginning 417.18'
NE of SW corner of SE' /4 ofNW %4, the NW 82', NE 73', NE 603.11', SE 170.52', SW 745.361
,
NW 98'to Point of Beginning (POB). Land value in 1959 for this parcel was $100 while it had
an improvement /building value of $21,930.
G. The YMCA and Subsequent Owners
On April 3, 1973, The Servco Foundation and surviving relatives of the Webb,
Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note families conveyed all of the Elsinore property (258 acres) as
a "gift" to the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) of Greater Long Beach (Document #
42031). Mr. Clyde L. Bronn served as manager for the YMCA. There are approximately nine
other separate deeds (one per surviving relative) on file for the transfer.
25
Within a year of receiving the ranch from The Servco Foundation, the YMCA conveyed
the property to the Mobil Oil Corporation. Some of the latter owners included Leroy and Vera
Baughman of Sun City (1978), Missing Link Investor II, a limited partnership of Lake Elsinore
(1981), and Spyglass Ranch, LLC of Newport Beach (2004).
IX. THE DELANEY RANCH COMPLEX
When Arthur J. Delaney owned the property there were at the very least horses and
milking cows on the ranch. They were stabled quite a distance to the east of the ranch house
complex. However, livestock totals grew substantially when the Servco partners acquired the
property. According to Reed Webb, there were many horses, about 20 pigs, 14 sheep, 100 -200
turkeys, 2,000 chickens and several peacocks (Webb 2013:pers. comm.).
It is not ]mown if Delaney had a ranch caretaker but it would be fair to assume so. It is
known that from the early 1950s to the early 1970s, that the Servco partners employed two
caretakers. The caretaker's house was located below the large ranch house at the base of the hill
(fig. 4). This structure is believed to have been demolished in the early 1980s as a result of new
highway construction. Nothing is known about the origin of the house other than it may have
predated the Delaney's ranch house.
Initially, Mr. Al Yorba and his wife Edith? served as the ranch caretakers in the early to
mid 1950s. Apparently, Mr. Yorba was quite the rancher and came highly recommended (ibid.).
In addition to the numerous animals, there was also a lot of planting and watering to be done.
The 1958 -1959 Riverside County Directory indicated that a second caretaker, Mr. Winfield Scott
Brownell (aka Winfield Hastings) and his wife Joy were managers of Servco Ranch. The
Brownells remained the ranch caretakers through 1973 when the Servco Foundation donated the
ranch to the YMCA. In addition to the Webb, Westerlund, Mahan, and Van Note families, the
ranch was enjoyed by members of the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Church Youth Groups, and the
American Field Service (AFS) as the ranch house had several rooms described as dormitories.
X. FIELD SURVEY
A field survey of the project site for historic resources took at intervals during June and
July, 2013. Field personnel included Laura S. White, M.A. and Robert S. White. The intensive
survey was conducted by thoroughly examining the built environment within the subject 2.92-
26
acre parcel. This included an examination of the existing ranch house at 523 W. Minthorn
Street, nearby pool house, swimming pool, and `lookout tower ". Field notes and photographs
were taken of all standing buildings and structures located within APN 377 - 350 -004. Outside
the parcel, locations of former ranch buildings and structures were briefly inspected using the
200 -scale Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation map of Section 5 as a guide.
XI. BUILDING RECORDS FOR THE STUDY AREA
Building records for the study area were procured from Mr. Michael Sprang, Senior
Appraiser, Agricultural Division, with the Riverside County Assessor - Clerk- Recorder. Initial
county appraisal records for the property date to 1967. At this time, the effective year or date of
construction for the residence was listed as 1930. The building description indicates that the
residence measures 3816 sq. ft. and comprises 4 bedrooms, 2 dormitories, and 3 baths. Other
rooms include a living room, dining room, sunroom (solarium), kitchen, utility room, and 2 entry
halls. The appraiser noted the following:
...Excellent plaster work throughout house. Walls constructed of
hollow tile. Stuccoed exterior with 2 x 4 framework on interior
with lath and plaster. Creates very thick walls (Riverside County
Assessor 1967).
Other buildings recorded under the heading "Miscellaneous Structures" included: 1) a swimming
pool and reservoir (cistern), 2) pool house, and 3) "Lookout tower."
XII. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF 523 W. MINTHORN STREET COMPLEX
A. Ranch House
Originally, this single -story ranch house was U- shaped in plan with covered porches and
a central courtyard (plates I -III). As originally conceived, the architectural style of the house is
best described as Spanish Eclectic as the fapade was symmetrical rather than asymmetrical as
found in the Spanish Revival style. Many of the same architectural elements such as low- pitched
roofs clad in red tile, stucco covered walls, and arched entries are shared by Spanish Eclectic,
Spanish Revival and Mission Revival.
27
Today, the building is very irregular in plan as several additions such as dormitories and
guest rooms have been added over the years. The classic low- pitched gable roof is clad with a
double layer of red clay tiles. Minimal, overhanging eaves have rounded rafter tails and attic
vents consist of the cell or concavity portion of hollow tiles. Shed roof porches with open beam
ceilings front the courtyard and are covered with red clay tile. Porch roof supports comprise
stucco pillars that are also likely constructed of hollow tile (plate V:top). The porch walkways
comprise large, rectangular clay tiles. In addition to a semi - circular arched opening, there were
three large, thick and heavy solid wood doors in the inner patio area. Outside, there were two
paneled doors for the solarium and kitchen (Webb 2013:pers. comm.). Fenestration consists of
square, metal- framed two -over -two double hung sashes. An interior chimney which
accommodated two, back to back hearths is located midway along the southwest portion of the
residence. The chimney is clad in stucco and has three terra cotta flue extensions (plate 111).
Attached to the west end of the main house is a large, shed roof addition that extends
outward over the slope. It comprises a sun room or solarium and balcony (plate IV:bottom).
The specific date of construction of the addition is not known. However, it was there in 1953
when the Servco partners purchased the property. The dead space below the solarium was
converted into a "smoke room" where meat was preserved and another area for curing cheese
(Westerlund 2013:pers. comet., Webb 2013:pers. comm.). Originally, there were two garages
separated by a carport. The closest one to the courtyard was later converted into a large
dormitory sometime in the mid 1950s by the Serveo partners (plate II:bottom). In addition, the
milk room attached to the back of the kitchen was turned into guest quarters (plate IV).
The house and all of the subsequent additions with exception of the sun room are
constructed upon concrete slabs. All original exterior walls and some interior, are constructed
from 12" x 12" x 8" hollow tile (plate VI and plate VII:top). Each tile has 6 concavities or cells
that measure 2 %" x 3 ". Tiles are stamped "Alberhill Loadbearing LAB Co." As indicated,
these particular hollow tiles were manufactured locally by the LA Brick Co. in Alberhill (Plate
VII).
Briefly, hollow building tiles were commonly used for building construction during the
first quarter of the 20`x' century. Since stucco was usually the exterior covering, Mission and
Mediterranean revival styles are some of the most common types of homes built with the blocks
(Kibbel 2004). In November of 1915, plans were drawn for a new firebrick plant in Alberhill.
28
These plans also included hollow -tile dwellings for the workers and a townsite. Construction of
the plant began in August of 1916 and two months later, Plant Number 4 of the Los Angeles
Pressed Brick Company was completed. Harvey Gardner was the plant superintendent, R.S.
Stone, assistant superintendent (Mosier 2010).
Overall, the ranch house complex is in poor condition. Only sporadically occupied over
the last 25- years, the ravages of time and vandalism including various interior and exterior
demolitions and unfinished modifications have taken their toll on the building. Today, the
integrity of the ranch house is tenuous at best and has reached a point where it appears to be
impractical to restore.
B. Pool House
Located on the hilltop to the northeast of the ranch house is the Pool House (Plate VIII).
This northwest - southeast oriented building is rectangular in plan and lies just southwest of the
swimming pool. It rests on a concrete slab and is constructed of H- pattern cement blocks (12" x
12" x 3 1/2 ") with two horizontal cavities (plate VII:bottom) that are coated with thick plaster.
The building has a low- pitched gable roof that is planked and covered with clay tiles (many of
which are missing or broken). Eaves have exposed rafter tails and fenestration comprises
rectangular openings with either modern double hung sashes or just window screen. Fronting the
pool is a series of five private changing rooms (two that included plumbing for toilets).
Entrances to these rooms are sheltered by a covered patio supported by a series of four,
elliptically- shaped arches. The structure is in very poor condition (plate VIII).
C. Swimming Pool
The concrete pool is rectangular in shape and oriented northeast- southwest. It has inside
dimensions of 30' x 90' which are nowhere close to those of an Olympic size pool (82' x 164')
as previously recorded (Meredith 1982). For safety reasons, the pool has been filled in with soil
and appears to have been this way for decades. Located at the northeast end of the pool is a
redwood plank diving board on concrete pedestals (plate IX). Based upon its presence, this end
of the pool most likely had a depth of at least 8 feet. According to Mr. Webb:
29
...If we kept the pump running, the cistern would overflow into a
4 -inch pipe that extended over the swimming pool and this was
used to fill the huge 30' x 90' pool. The pool was used then as a
reservoir for all of the very extensive landscape irrigation around
the house and over to the livestock area in the middle of the ranch.
It was always a favorite to float under the overflow spout with
water tumbling at least ten or twelve feet down into the pool. I can
remember being told that it was expensive to till the pool because
of the power used and the cost of the water that could get algae
buildup if left unattended for too long." (Webb 2013:pers. comm.).
D. The "Lookout" and Cistern
A 12' x 12' structure is located upslope just northwest of the swimming pool. From this
vantage point, one could sit and enjoy the spectacular view of Lake Elsinore (ibid.). The top half
of the structure includes an elevated platform with tile floor and open beam construction. The
gabled roof is fashioned from 1" x 6" tongue- and - groove and covered with clay tiles. It is
supported by four stucco clad pillars.
The lower half of the structure is concrete and houses the cistern (plate X). Access to the
water feature is from a square hatch centrally located at the rear of the structure. From below the
access hatch sill, the cistern is 8 feet deep. Water for the cistern was pumped uphill from a large
electric pump located at the base of the hill below the main house in the vicinity of the
Caretaker's house. Water was then piped down to the house for domestic use (Webb 2013:pers.
comm.).
XIII. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY
The Delaney Ranch House situated at 523 W. Minthorn Street (Primary # 33 -7228) was
first evaluated for historical /architectural significance in 1982 by the Riverside County Historical
Commission. At that time, the residence was said to be of adobe construction and represent "one
of the best examples of Mediterranean /Spanish style homes built in the late 1920s building
boom. Its gazebo, cabana, and Olympic -size swimming pool make it unique in the Lake Elsinore
Valley" (Meredith 1982). Consequently, the complex was assigned a California Historical
Resource Status Code of 3S "Appears eligible for NR as an individual property through survey
evaluation." However, this high status code (the lower the number the higher or more significant
the status code) is the result of some misinformation.
30
The residence was re- visited by JMA in 2013 at which time it was re- evaluated for
significance under two separate legislative sources: 1) the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (NHPA), which includes criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP), and 2) the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which includes criteria for
California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility.
A. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Evaluation
In order for an historic resource to be significant pursuant to Federal law, it must be
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Generally, listing in the
NRHP requires that a building or structure be at least 50 years old and that it possess "The
quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture ...
present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location,
design, setting, material, workmanship, feeling, and association ..." and ...
(A) That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of our history or
(B) That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
(C) That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic
values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction; or
(D) That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory
or history."
B. California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) Evaluation
According to California law, only significant historic resources require consideration
beyond the identification stage in the environmental review process. Significant historical
resources "are resources which are listed in the California Register of Historical Resources
(CRHR: Ca. Code of Regs. §15064.5). In addition, "Any object, building, structure, site, area,
place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or
significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational,
social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical
31
resource "...if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the CRHR. An eligible resource is one
which:
(A) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the
United States.
(B) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national
history;
(C) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of
construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values;
or
(D) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory
or history of the local area, California, or the nation.
XIV. DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY
A. NRHP and CRHR
Criterion A
Fairly extensive research has indicated that the Delaney Ranch House and associated
structures are not associated with any event important in the regional history of California or the
United States. Consequently, the residence does not appear eligible for listing in either the
NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion A.
Criterion B
The ranch house complex was constructed by Arthur Delaney, a successful oil man from
Long Beach. However, many individuals in the Lake Elsinore were of the opinion that Olympic
swimmer and Hollywood actor Johnny Weissmuller had a direct connection to the ranch.
Extensive background research and interviews with the descendents of previous owners have
shown this to be patently false. Weismuller did not build the house let alone own the property.
Insofar as anyone can recall, he never rented or leased the house. That is not to say that he may
have been invited for a visit but no one interviewed ever recalled Weissmuller stepping foot on
the property. Consequently, research has failed to identify any person connected to the Delaney
32
Ranch House considered to be important to National or California history. Therefore, the
residence does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR Under Criterion B.
Criterion C
Research has indicated that construction of the Delaney Ranch House did not begin until
1935. No architect has been identified with the undertaking. Although the style of the complex
is Spanish Eclectic, the classic `U' shape of the Californio Rancho has been significantly
adulterated to where it is almost unrecognizable. Today, the complex is fundamentally a series
of box additions to the original core designed to increase useable living space with complete
disregard to architectural continuity.
When first recorded in 1982, the residence was thought to be of adobe construction
(Meredith 1982). But in actuality, it is built of hollow tiles covered with thick plaster or stucco.
The use of load bearing hollow tiles for the exterior and some interior walls does not appear to be
unique in house construction for the period as the Alberhill LA Brick Co. manufactured a great
deal of them for the local and national markets. Unfortunately, they suffer from the same
seismic instability problems found in all unreinforced masonry construction.
The loss of architectural integrity through haphazard additions and modifications coupled
with a significantly deteriorated physical state, have resulted in reducing the house to little more
than a curiosity. For these reasons, the Delaney Ranch House does not appear eligible for the
NRHP or CRHR under Criterion C.
Criterion D
Criterion D is generally reserved for prehistoric and historic archaeological sites whose
further study could yield additional important data. As the Delaney Ranch House is not
archaeological in nature, it does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR under
Criterion D.
XV. RECOMMENDATIONS
As presently proposed, the Delaney Ranch House and associated structures are slated for
demolition. However, since none of the buildings or swimming pool are considered
architecturally or historically significant at the federal and state levels, there will be no adverse
33
impacts to historic resources. Therefore, no additional measures in conjunction with cultural
resources are recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout.
34
REFERENCES CITED
ATKINS, RUTH
2013 Personal communications. President of the Lake Elsinore Historical Society.
BYNON, A.A. & SON
1992 history and Directory of Riverside County 1893 -4. Centennial reprint by the
Historical Commission Press (1st printing 1 894). Riverside.
CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE (DEBRA BOWDEN)
2013a Delaney Petroleum Corporation. Business Entity Detail.
2013b The Servco Foundation. Business Entity Detail.
CORRAL, JEAN
2013 Personal communication. Lake Elsinore resident (since 1964), historian and
author.
ELSINORE LEADER PRESS
Roll G (January 1928 — August 23, 1928, Roll H (August 30- 1928- December 25,
1930, and Roll I (January 1, 1931- August 1, 1932) on file with the Lake Elsinore
Branch Library.
GHIOTTO, GENE
2011 "Lake Elsinore: Citys pioneers were the first to Dream Extreme." Press
Enterprise, Local News, August 15, 2011.
GUNTHER, JANE DAVIES
1984 Riverside County Place Names, their Origins & their Stories. Rubidoux Printing
Company. Riverside.
HORTON, ROY JAMES
2013 Personal communication. Grandson to A.J. Delaney and son to Patricia Joy
Delaney Horton.
HUDSON, TOM
1988 Lake Elsinore Valley: its story 1776 -1977. City of Lake Elsinore Centennial (2nd
printing). Lake Elsinore.
INDEPENDENT PRESS- TELEGRAM
1960 "When the Brown Derby Was a Hat." News Section. May 1, 1960. Long Beach.
JAMES, ELIZABETH C.
1973 Elsinore History Vignettes. Inland California Publishing Company.
35
KIBBEL, BILL
2004 Historic Buildings - Structural Terra Cotta. http: / /historiebidgs.com /terra cotta.hun
LA LAGUNA REVUE. Monthly news magazine. Mayhill Press. Lake Elsinore.
LONG BEACH PRESS - TELEGRAM
2013 Obituary for Patricia Joy Delaney Horton. April 17, 2013.
MOSIER, DAN
2010 California Bricks. Los Angeles Pressed Brick Company, Alberhill.
THE HIGH COUNTRY. Quarterly history magazine. Published by Cox, Hicks, Hudson, and
Love, Tom Hudson, editor. Temecula.
VAN NOTE, CHARLES O.
1969 Patent US3476415. United States Patent Office.
WEBB, H. REED
2013 Personal communication. Son of E.Ray Webb, Servco Ranch partner.
WESTERLUND, JON
2013 Personal communication. Son of Paul Westerlund, Servco Ranch partner.
WILLIAMS, MICHAEL J.
2009 "Lake Elsinore: Brothers say they heard Elsinore Weissmuller stories. San Diego
Union Tribune. News section. August 9, 2009.
36
Plate L Top: Northwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House from access road to the east.
Bottom: Southeasterly view of Delaney Ranch House from hilltop to the northwest.
37
Plate 11. Top: Southwesterly view of Delaney Ranch House from Pool House above.
Bottom: West facing view into courtyard showing damage.
38
Plate III. Top: 1981 photograph of courtyard looking southwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission).
Bottom: Southwesterly view into courtyard as it appears today.
39
Plate IV. Top: 1981 photograph of milk room looking northwest (Riverside Co. Historical Commission).
Bottom: Northwesterly view of converted milk room into guest room.
40
Plate V. Top: Looking northeast through covered porch toward arched entry on courtyard.
Bottom: Northwesterly view of original garage and carport.
41
Plate VI. Top: Northwesterly view of a cross- scction of hollow tile from the demolished courtyard wall.
Bottom: Close -up of intact ALBBRHILL LOADBEAKING LAB CO hollow block building tiles.
42
Plate VII. Top: Stamp of the Alberhill LA Brick Co. impressed into the hollow block building tile.
Bottom: Close -up of concrete `H' blocks used in the construction of Pool House.
43
Plate VIII. Top: Southwesterly view of Pool House and back- filled swimming pool.
Bottom: Southeasterly view of deteriorated Pool House roof.
44
Plate IX. Top: Northeasterly view of back -filled pool from Pool House.
Bottom: Easterly view of deteriorated diving board at the northeast end of Pool.
45
Plate X. Top: 1981 photograph depicting Lookout, Pool, and Pool House (Riverside Co. Historical
Commission). Bottom: Close -up of Lookout over cistern looking northwest as it appears today.
46
APPENDIX A: PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
DAVID M. VAN HORN, PH.D.
Education
B.A. in Art History (1969) University of California at Santa Barbara (with honors). Studies
included classical, medieval, renaissance, Spanish, and modern
architecture. Independent study with Prof. David Gebhard, noted
southern California architectural historian.
Ph.D. in Classical University of Pennsylvania. Bronze Age to Hellenistic classical
Archaeology (1976) architecture. Studied Athenian topography (urban growth and
architectural development) with Prof. Rodney S. Young, noted
classical architectural historian.
Professional Historic /Architectural Affiliations
Member, Register of Professional Historians (2006- present)
ArchitecturalWistorieal Experience
As a professional cultural resource management consultant since 1977, Dr. Van Horn has
researched, evaluated and reported on literally hundreds of architectural and historical properties.
These have included buildings of all dates, from 19`s century adobe ruins to modern Los Angeles
residences; and structures of all types, consisting of canals, bridges, resorts, schools, community
facilities, commercial buildings and industrial plants. This research has been conducted for various
types of projects including bridge construction, surface and subway transit facilities, and road
improvement projects.
The following selected projects are intended to illustrate Dr. Van Horn's experience with
architectural history and historic archaeology.
P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel (909) 244 -1783 Fax (909) 244 -0084
ARCHITECTURAL /HISTORICAL EVALUATION EXPERIENCE
HABS /HAER Projects
* Replica House, Pomona College, Claremont, Los Angeles County (2012). Project included
a Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER)
for the campus building known as Replica House (1938). The project entailed an extensive
architectural assessment, hand - measured scale drawings, detailed history and archival photographs
(large and medium format). Lead agency - Facilities Management, Pomona College.
* West Adobe, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside (2010 - 2012). Project includes an
Historic American Buildings Survey (RABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER)
for the West Adobe (1926). The undertaking entails an extensive architectural assessment of the
adobe, hand measured scale drawings, detailed family history and archival photographs (large and
medium format). Lead agency -City of La Quinta.
* Kraemer House, City of Placentia, County of Orange (2003 - 2004). Undertaking
comprised an Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering
Record (HAER) for the Gilbert Kraemer House (1920). The project entailed an extensive
architectural assessment of the estate house, hand - measured scale drawings, detailed family history
and archival photographs (large and medium format). Lead agency -City of Placentia.
* KEHE /KFI Radio Broadcast Studio Building, 141 N. Vermont Avenue, City of Los
Angeles, Los Angeles County (2002). The project included a HABS /HAER study of the National
Register eligible Radio Broadcast Studio Building (1936). The project entailed an extensive
architectural assessment of the facility, hand - measured scale drawings, archival photographs, as well
as a detailed history of Earle C. Anthony and radio station KFI. Lead agency- Los Angeles Unified
School District.
* Vega Building, East Los Angeles, Los Angeles County (1993). HABS /HAER recordation
of a three -story commercial building listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Lead
agency- Los Angeles Department of Public Works.
Section 106 Caltrans Projects
* Metrolink Parking Structure Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County
(2009). This parking structure project lies within Viaduct Park adjacent to the historic Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Passenger and Freight Depot. Section106 compliance included
HPSR, HRER, and FOE reports prepared for Caltrans District 8.
* Ranchero Road and BNSF Grade Separation Project, City of Ilesperia, San Bernardino
County (2007). This road improvement project included Section 106 compliance for all residential
and commercial properties located along a 7700 -foot portion of roadway. HPSR and HAER
2
documents prepared for Caltrans District 8.
* Ramona Avenue Grade Separation Project, Montclair, San Bernardino County (2000).
Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on 1/2 -mile street widening
program. City of Montclair and Caltrans District 8.
* Imperial Highway- Orangethorpe /Esperanza Grade Separation Project, City of Yorba
Linda, Orange County (1999- 2000). Grade separation project for Imperial Highway over the BNSF
tracks and Orangethorpe Avenue /Esperanza Road. Undertaking comprised architectural /historical
analysis of all buildings and structures over 50 -years of age and determinations of eligibility for the
National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. An
extensive field survey resulted in the discovery of a surviving portion of the 19 °i century Scully
Adobe, a component to the Don Bernardo Yorba Rancho complex. Consultation for the project was
through Caltrans District's 12 & 7 as well as Caltrans Headquarters in Sacramento. City of Yorba
Linda.
* Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) improvement Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County (1993). Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on a 1.5 mile
street widening program. City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans District 8.
* Turnbull Canyon Road Improvement, City of Industry, Los Angeles County (1992).
Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR). Section 106 compliance on a 1.5 mile street widening
program. Los Angeles County of Public Works / Caltrans District 7.
Section 106 Municipal Projects
* TERI Project, San Marcos, County of San Diego (2003- 2008). Project entailed an initial
survey of the 20 -acre Merriam Ranch and subsequent determinations of eligibility for both the
National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. A total of
six buildings and structures were assessed for this project including the 1889 Merriam Ranch House
"La Mesita ".
* Cultural Resources Assessment for the Cerritos College 2003 Master Plan, Norwalk, Los
Angeles County (2004). Tasks performed included a records search, history of the school and
surrounding region, biographical sketch of the architectural firm, architectural evaluations of seven
campus buildings for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register
of Historical Resources (CRHR), completion of historic building records (DPR 523 series forms),
and report.
* Spring Mountain Ranch, Highgrove, Riverside County (2002). Project entailed a focused
survey, history and subsequent determinations of eligibility for the Eureka and Vivienda Ranch
complexes. A total of six buildings and structures (early 20'x' century) were evaluated for both the
NRHP and CRHR. Several of the buildings were constructed by Ethan Allen Chase, noted early 20`x'
century citrus rancher in Riverside County.
3
* Fay Jackson Residence, 1325 S. Van Ness Avenue, City of Los Angeles (2002). Los
Angeles Unified School District and Chattel Architecture, Planning & Preservation, Inc. Conducted
determinations of eligibility for the National Register and the California Register of Historical
Resources for the residence of this important African - American journalist.
* Casa Ramona School, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County (1999).
Determinations of eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register
of Historical Resources. Research on architecture of David Witmer, chief architect of the Pentagon
and noted early 201h century southern California school architect_ City of San Bernardino.
* Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (MIA) Metro Red Line Mid -City
Project, Los Angeles (1996 - 1999). Historic and architectural evaluations of approximately 600
buildings and structures that lay above and adjacent to three alternative subway routes in the Mid -
City section of Los Angeles. Of the 600 buildings and structures within the project area,
approximately 450 required full historic and architectural evaluations in order to make
determinations of eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. The project was conducted
in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Caltrans District 7, the Federal
Transit Authority, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the MTA.
* Aquatics /Teen Center /Maintenance Facility /Parking Project, City of El Monte, Los
Angeles County (1999). Section 106 consultation intended to ascertain National Register Eligibility
of several structures prior to demolition. City of El Monte Department of Parks, Recreation and
Transportation and SHPO.
* Riverside Cement Oro Grande Facility, Victorville, San Bernardino County (1998).
Archaeological survey for prehistoric resources and determinations of eligibility for all historic
structures within the 150 -acre facility. Evaluation of architecture of 20`h century industrial structures
and 19`x' century lime kilns. San Bernardino County Planning Department.
* Master Campus Development Plan of Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, Los
Angeles County (1993). Historic and architectural evaluations, and determinations of NRHP
eligibility of approximately 30 campus buildings. City of Claremont.
* Downtown Business District Specific Plan Area, City of La Puente, Los Angeles County
(1992). Historical reconstruction, architectural evaluations, and determinations ofNRHP eligibility
of six downtown city blocks. City of La Puente.
• El Pueblo State Historic Park, Los Angeles County (1984). Compiled reconstructions
of all structures on several blocks of the El Pueblo District, the oldest part of Los
Angeles. The reconstructions, which were based upon archival research at many
southern California Institutions, were arranged in eras beginning with Los Angeles'
pueblo days and ending with the modern city. California Department of Parks and
Recreation.
4
Historic Archaeological Projects
* Mission San Juan Capistrano Zanja, City of San Juan Capistrano, County of Orange
(2002). Undertaking comprised initial identification, excavation, and documentation of the Mission
San Juan Capistrano's Trabuco aqueduct (early 19th century). This buried feature was exhaustively
researched and documented by the excavation of certain sections of the aqueduct complete with
detailed drawings, photographs and narrative report.
* Buena Vista Coal Generating Plant and Coal Terminal (1990- 1991). Directed a survey
and Phase lI excavation program. Uncovered and evaluated a segment of the old North River
Navigation (canal). Research with Dr. W.E. Trout (Va. Canals & Navigations Society) and Mr.
Mike Barber (prehistory). Report on file with the Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources; reviewed
and accepted by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
* Chapin Adobe, City of Indian Wells, Riverside County (1989). Conducted both test and
salvage archaeological investigations of the Chapin Adobe. This interesting structure, which
belonged to one of Indian Well's first white immigrant families, existed only as "melted" foundations
at the time the study commenced. Based upon the archaeological evidence and historical
information and photographs acquired with the help of the Chapin family, Van Horn was able to
reconstruct the entire building on paper. This study provided some surprising data on adobe
building techniques employed by the early settlers of the Coachella Valley. City of Indian Wells.
* Peralta Adobe, Anaheim Hills, Orange County (1983 -84). This mid -19th century adobe
was a ruin at the outset of the investigation, the second floor having been burned out and many of
the doors and windows altered or removed altogether. Van Horn studied the remaining architectural
features intensively, often removing elements of late remodeling in order to expose evidence of the
original construction. IIe also conducted archaeological excavations in and around the adobe which
resulted in the recovery of many period artifacts. Today, the Ramon Peralta Adobe stands as a
renovated structure which contains exhibits of photographs and artifacts acquired during my
investigation. The entire project was conducted under the auspices of the Orange County Historical
Commission and the Orange County Department of Parks and Recreation.
Publications in Architecture and History
Van Horn, David and John Elliott
2003 Investigations at the Ramon Peralta Adobe. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society
Occasional Paper Number 3. Contains a complete architectural reconstruction,
history of, and historical archaeology of one of southern California's few surviving
19 °i century adobe residences.
Van Horn, David
2003 A Brief History of Penobscot Bay. Robert's Press. Castine, ME. Short history of
some of the earliest European settlements in the Penobscot Bay region from
Rockland to Bar Harbor.
F
Van Born, David M.
1993 A BriefEarly History of Castine: Prehistory to 1815. Robert's Press. Castine, ME.
This brief account is intended to give the reader a convenient synopsis of Castine's
early history. Few places can boast a history as lengthy, complex, and colorful as the
small town of Castine, Maine.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
LAURA S. WHITE
Curriculum Vitae
Address: P.O. 180
Sun City, CA 92586
Phone: (951) 244 -1783
EDUCATION
1989 M.A. in Anthropology with emphasis in Archaeology,
San Diego State University, San Diego.
1981 B.A. in Anthropology, University of San Diego, San Diego.
1978 -1979 University of San Diego Business School.
1977 -1978 Pepperdine University Business School.
CREDENTIALS
1999 - Present Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) Certification: Archaeologist
I.D. # 10452
1990 -1998 Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) Certification: Field Research
GENERAL
Laura S. White, M.A. is a RPA (Register of Professional Archaeologists) /SOPA (Society of
Professional Archaeologists) certified archaeologist and has held the full -time position of Field
Director with Archaeological Associates since 1990. During the past twenty-seven years of her
professional career, she has contributed to or directed all phases of archaeological investigation for
hundreds of projects. Recently, she has completed a number of private and governmental
assessments requiring a Section 106 consultation and /or National Register eligibility.
Ms. White has extensive experience with cultural resource compliance with regard to CEQA,
NEPA, NABS, HAER and various other local criteria. Aside from her RYA /SOPA rating, Ms.
White is also certified by the Counties of Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino, and
Ventura to direct all phases of archaeological investigation.
P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel (951) 244 -1783 Fax (951) 244 -0084
Her archaeological expertise has taken her to project sites located throughout southern and
central California. These undertakings have comprised both prehistoric and historic archaeological
investigations situated in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Ventura,
Kern, Fresno, Madera, Inyo, San Diego, and Imperial Counties.
In conjunction with her career as a professional archaeologist, Ms. White was Co- Editor of
the prestigious Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly journal from 1990 -1991. She has
also been a guest lecturer at the request of the Bureau of Land Management and Long Beach State
University, Furthermore, she has designed archaeological exhibits for the San Diego Museum of
Man and the City of Vista, San Diego County.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
American Committee for the Preservation of Archaeological Collections (ACPAC)
OVERSEAS EXPERIENCE
1981 Participant in on -going excavations at Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England.
PR OD UCTION A CTI VI TIES
1991 -1990 Co- editor for the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly. The PCAS
Quarterly is one of two professional archaeological journals dedicated to the
archaeology of southern California.
EXHIBITS
1987 Participant in construction of exhibit for the City of Vista, California. Artifacts on display
are all from archaeological sites in the Vista area.
1981 Participant in construction of exhibit on the Early Cultures of San Diego, San Diego Museum
of Man. University of San Diego, San Diego.
GRANTS
- 1981 Recipient of an Academic Research Grant for archaeology, University of San Diego, San
Diego, California.
LECTURES AND PRESENTATIONS
1991 Guest lectured for the Mojave River Archaeological Society in Barstow. Topic: The Atlatl
in California.
1987 Guest lectured at Long Beach State University. Topic: Contract Archaeology.
1985 The Plight of Del Mar Man. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of Society for
California Archaeology, San Diego.
PUBLICATIONS
Van Horn, David, Laura S. White, and Robert S. White
2005 The Prehistory of Gretna Green, A Site in Northern San Diego County, pp. 145 -168.
IN: Onward and Upward.! Papers in Honor of Clement W. Meighan (Keith L.
Johnson, editor). Stansbury Publishing. Chico.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE AND UNPUBLISHED ARCHAEOLOGICAL
REPORTS
A representative list of field experience and unpublished archaeological reports is available
upon request.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
P.O. Box 180 Sim City, CA 92586 Tel (951) 244 -1783 Fax (951) 244 -0084
ROBERT S. WHITE
Curriculum Vitae
Address: P.O. Box 180
Sun City, CA 92586
Phone: (951) 244 -1783
EDUCATION
1987 B.A. in Liberal Studies with emphasis in Anthropology, California State University,
Long Beach.
1977 A.A. Degree in Liberal Arts, Los Angeles Harbor College.
GENERAL
Robert S. White has over twenty -eight years of full -time archaeological experience and has
been affiliated with a number of southern California contract archaeology firms beginning in 1983.
Since 1992 he has fulfilled the position of Director and more often than not, Principal investigator
for Archaeological Associates.
Mr. White has extensive experience in all aspects of cultural resource investigation and
management. These skills include but are not necessarily limited to: field survey and excavation,
construction and demolition monitoring, obsidian hydration studies, lab analysis, land surveying,
cartography, archival research, budgeting, planning, and document writing /production. Robert is
certified by the Orange, Riverside, and Ventura County Planning Departments to conduct all phases
of archaeological investigation.
Since 1983 Mr. White has conducted well over 350 prehistoric and historic archaeological
investigations in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Kern, San Diego, Imperial, and
Inyo Counties. Additionally, in concert with colleague Dr. David Van Horn, they have pioneered
innovative techniques that have revolutionized data recovery programs on large, tow - density
archaeological sites. Mr. White is also an experienced heavy equipment operator specializing in
loader /backhoe operations utilizing skid -steer loaders (Bobcats) and full -sized backhoes.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE
A representative list of archaeological field experience is available upon request.
PUBLICATIONS
2005 The Prehistory of Gretna Green, A Site in Northern San Diego County (with David Van Horn
and Laura S. White), pp. 145 -168. IN: Onward and Upward! Papers in Honor (?f Clement
W. Meighan (Keith L. Johnson, editor). Stansbury Publishing. Chico.
1991 Prehistoric Fire - Malting Techniques of California and Western Nevada. Pacifc Coast
Archaeological Society Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 27 -38.
1986 Some Techniques for Mechanical Excavation in Salvage Archaeology (with D.M. Van Horn
and J.R. Murray). Journal of Field Archaeology 13:239 -244.
UNPUBLISHED REPORTS
A representative list of unpublished archaeological reports /manuscripts is available upon
request.
2
D� -------- NO fn'go_ :n t'j"3uWe
-2
Oz n
vdopment_--_ Zoning Va,dalset
PAR Wks proka oww
------ - - - - ------
i. QvMvMwwC OnN.M&A-tv X
c"O"th? ----- --
Nume a-6 ... .... n 1 go
la SAHV Mw how f MOW '"W"n"A Noxyzame GoWde daes, "anm, and penans msamawd win Ad pw,!
Built in L021 Sy 3. Delaney, ch; SUSStuntluj house A one aO the
bust axamwes a! style Koons bujIL in Chu law,
0"d-H 50-0- lzs QW130. cabana, and Olympia sine swjEAjn
10'6'x
P"! nahc A in qj, in 1:0 Lake Elsinore Vajjcy
21 AM thene & me (jr MT, tP sr one is
Gore; nrneez .............
21.
am Key dave".
Lake ElFirture V,—
ITTTL,-Zcn�
Locational Sketch awt) (d,
'a'e, en"t (,)ei Ske and
turmwiding and onontinenc mrsn&kil:
/1, NUHTH
1
Lj
22. DmAwm pwanth 1
—
By Inau t' _ \j "CATii
Cc, r-i "C"I'al-11—C-0 M—M,
s"
u:1
C; t, Run Un Q 5-'-- T
1( a�HYUf
Y ....
Phone:
11
APPENDIX C
Lake Elsinore Historical Society Correspondence
April 23, 2013
Ms. Ruth Atkins, President
Lake Elsinore Historical Society
P.O. Box 84
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 -0084
RE: Historic Residence located at 523 W. Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore
Dear Ms. Atkins:
Archaeological Associates has been retained to conduct a Historic Building Assessment of the
residence and associated structures located at 523 W, Minthorn Street. It is our understanding
that the residence was constructed circa 1930 and has been vacant for several years.
We are seeking input from the historical society with regard to specific information on the
history of the property. If the society is aware of any literature, photos, or local residents that
may have special knowledge of the residence, we would very much like to hear from you. You
can contact me directly at 95124-4-1783 if you would like. Thanks !
Very truly yours,
Laura S. White
Field Director
LS W : fi le;spyglassinquiry
by US Mail
P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel: (951) 244.1783 (Fax: (951) 244 -0084 email: aa(4 inland net
Lake Elsinore Historical Society
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 84, Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 -0084
sum Telephone: 95115794852
e n
a es
11 17 May 6, 2013
Ms. Laura S. White
Archaeological Associates
P O Box 180
Sun City CA 92586
Dear Laura:
Re: Historic Residence located at 523 West Minthom Street. Lake Elsinore
In response to your letter about the subject property, we have absolutely nothing on this site. We
do, however, have lots of people who swear they know this property belonged to Johnny
Weissmuller or refer to it as Tarzan's House. One of our historians used to work downtown and
saw him driving his car up and down Main Street. Another person tells the story that his father
had an agency for movie stars and was an agent for Weissmuller. Everything we know about it
is heresy and cannot be verified. The people who could verify the stories are now deceased.
There is one lady in town who remembers going there as a little girl but she has no pictures just
memories. One of our members used to be a real estate broker in town and she did a title search
but his name did not show as an owner of the property.
Over the years, we have decided a friend owned the property. With the large swimming pool,
Weissmuller may have visited frequently. During the time, he supposedly visited here was alter
his years of participating in the Olympic Games and at the beginning of his movie career.
A son -in -law of his claims Weissmuller was never in Elsinore (as the town was called then) but
he did not become a member of the family until around the 1960s.
If you find anything that can verify his presence in Elsinore, we would appreciate your sharing it
with us.
Sincerely,
4Ruth Atkins
President
951.678,1537
951.678.1537
P. S. I have forwarded an e -mail to you about the digitized newspaper, the Riverside Daily Press,
v4'v'
v JJ.
Lake Elsinore Historical Society
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 84, Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 -0084
Telephone: 951/579 -4852
nm mw
aoc ena
11 lli October 19, 2012
City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: Warren Morelion, Acting Community Development Director
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore CA
Dear Warren:
Re: "Spyglass Ranch" House Demolition
523 West Minthom Street
Lake Elsinore CA
..f��j
OC 1 9 2012
1.1 r
i. cat _ „31:i'JORE
P1_FaNFl ;INIG �U'N` -, iON
In a special meeting of the Executive Committee (Board of Directors) of the Lake Elsinore
Historical Society held on August 11, 2012, we considered Erik Lunde's request of June 27, 2012,
to demolish the referenced building. The Lake Elsinore Historical Society previously advised the
City of Lake Elsinore in June 2009 that the house was considered historic and should not be
demolished.
Based on the information provided with Mr. Lunde's June 27, 2012 letter, the Executive
Committee unanimously reversed their previous declaration described in our June 2009 letter to
him.
We realize there will be a large volume of comments saying we are wrong to reverse our earlier
decision, However, there is no information /documentation/pictures available to verify that Tarzan
(Johnny Weissmuller) owned this property. We do believe he could have visited friends at this
location but all of our information is hearsay; and therefore cannot be used by the Historical
Society to document his presence in Lake Elsinore.
Sincerely,
Ruth Atkins
President
cc: Erik Lunde
VICINITY MAP
SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
TTM 35337 & TPM 35336
CITY OF
LAKE LSiNOBJE
�s DREAM EXTRUM@
AERIAL MAP
SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
TTM 35337 & TPM 35336
CITY OF ,,/r
F., �.
LAKE � LST� E
EXTREME
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE ADOPTING ADDENDUM #1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT NO. 2007 -01 FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SPYGLASS
RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
35337, AMENDMENT NO. 1 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
35336, AMENDMENT NO. 1
WHEREAS, Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, has filed applications
with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch
Specific Plan No. 2005 -02 (SPA 2014 -01), Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment
No. 1 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 ( "Project "). The Project
site consists 259 -acres located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection
with Main Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers 377 - 250 -011, 377 - 260 -004, 005 and 006,
377- 350 -004, 007, 008, 010, 014, 015, 016, and 017); and,
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA ") and the
State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections
15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines ") because the Project involves an activity which may
cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease,
permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies
(Public Resources Code Section 21065); and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007 -01 (SCH
No. 2006121069) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the
development of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336
and Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 were part of the whole action that was analyzed in
the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan EIR; and
WHEREAS, a "Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch
House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside
County, California ", dated June 2014 (the "Report') was prepared by John Minch and
Associates to provide additional analysis regarding the Delaney Ranch Complex, also
known as the "Tarzan House ": and
WHEREAS, the Report was conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that because "none of the
buildings or swimming pool are considered architecturally or historically significant at the
federal and state levels, there will be no adverse impacts to historic resources ";
therefore "no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are
recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout'; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-.
PAGE 2 OF 5
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Report provides
some changes and additions to the certified EIR and therefore constitutes Addendum
#1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.24.110 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
( "LEMC ") the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of
recommending to the City Council the approval, conditional approval or denial of
tentative maps; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD
Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the
responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval
or denial of a specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2014 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public
hearings, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015 -12 recommending that the City
Council adopt Addendum #1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01 for
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, Tentative Tract
Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment
No. 1. and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code ( "LEMC ") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the
responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission
action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD
Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with
modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council
has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of the proposed
Addendum #1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01, the CEQA documents, and
the evidence received to date, does determine as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-.
PAGE 3 OF 5
projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that
would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some
changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is
necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason,
pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical
and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located
at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County,
California, dated June 2014 and prepared by John Minch and Associates,
constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01.
2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines.
3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the
analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in
Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report
have occurred; specifically:
a. There have not been any substantial changes to the Spyglass Ranch
Specific Plan, Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 or Tentative Tract Map
No. 35337 that require major revisions of the CEQA documents
because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the
circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that
require major revisions of the CEQA documents due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, and
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not
known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable
diligence at the time Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01 was
adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in Environmental Impact
Report No. 2007 -01; (b) significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in Environmental Impact Report
No. 2007 -01; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the Environmental Impact
Report No. 2007 -01 would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measure or alternative.
SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral,
received from persons who have reviewed Addendum #1 to Environmental Impact
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -
PAGE 4 OF 5
Report No. 2007 -01. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public
comments have been addressed.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that Addendum #1 to Environmental
Impact Report No. 2007 -01 for the Project is adequate and has been completed in
accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for
implementation of CEQA. The City Council has reviewed and considered the
information contained in the Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01 and Addendum
#1 and finds that the Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01 and Addendum #1
represents the independent judgment of the City.
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, the City
Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby adopts Addendum #1 to Environmental
Impact Report No. 2007 -01 for Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
No. 2005 -02 (SPA 2014 -01), Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of April, 2015.
Steve Manos, Mayor
City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Barbara Leibold, City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
PAGE 5 OF 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. 2015 -_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPYGLASS RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON
THE EAST SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION
WITH MAIN STREET
WHEREAS, Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, has filed an application
with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan
No. 2005 -02 (SPA 2014 -01) to the Spyglass Specific Plan (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, the 259 -acre project site is generally located on the east side of
Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street, and
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the
State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections
15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines') because the Project involves an activity which may
cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease,
permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies
(Public Resources Code Section 21065); and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007 -01 (SCH
No. 2006121069) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the
development of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan were part of the whole action that
was analyzed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan EIR; and
WHEREAS, a "Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch
House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside
County, California ", dated June 2014 (the "Report ") was prepared by John Minch and
Associates to provide additional analysis regarding the Delaney Ranch Complex, also
known as the "Tarzan House ": and
WHEREAS, the Report was conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that because "none of the
buildings or swimming pool are considered architecturally or historically significant at the
federal and state levels, there will be no adverse impacts to historic resources ";
therefore "no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are
recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout ", and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD
Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the
responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval
or denial of a specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -
PAGE 2 OF 6
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2014 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public
hearings, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015 -13 recommending that the City
Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD
Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with
modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council
has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project
pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et
sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds
and determines that the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan No. 2005 -02 (SPA 2014 -01) is consistent with the requirements of California
Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General
Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code..
SECTION 2. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of Addendum #1
to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01, the CEQA documents, and the evidence
received to date, does determine as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved
projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that
would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some
changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is
necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason,
pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical
and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located
at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County,
California, dated June 2014 and prepared by John Minch and Associates,
constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -_
PAGE 3 OF 6
2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines.
3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the
analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in
Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Initial Study have occurred;
specifically:
SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for the
approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02 (SPA
2014 -01):
1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent
with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other
applicable plan or policies adopted by the City.
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan meets the City's
Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the
General Plan established by Section 65450 et seq. of the California
Government Code and Section 17.204 of the City of Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment
complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the
planning district in which the site is located.
2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well- integrated
with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the
case.
Approval of the Project will allow the demolitions of the existing structures
found on a 0.4 acre site known as Planning Area 3. Planning Area 7 &
Planning Area 13 will be combined and developed into an approximately
6.5 acres of park.
3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased
increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without
causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets.
The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of
traffic generated that will result from implementation of Amendment No. 1
of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan has been reviewed and accounted
for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of
adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by
car, truck, transit and bicycle.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -_
PAGE 4 OF 6
4. Amendment No. 1 of the Spyglass Specific Plan identifies methodology(s)
to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed
public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as
provided elsewhere by the Municipal Code, the City may require that
suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or
public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for
the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the
development.
The Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Specific Plan identifies necessary
streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as
well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate
infrastructure services. The amendment will allow removal of structures
that have been experiencing ongoing vandalism making these structures a
health and safety issue. The applicant/developer shall develop an
approximately 6.5 acres park within the combined Planning Area 7 &
Planning Area 13, thus centralizing the park area that will be utilized for
active recreation purposes.
5. The overall design of Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan No. 2005 -02 (SPA 2014 -01) will produce an attractive, efficient and
stable development.
Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005 -02 (SPA
2014 -01) allows for the demolition of structures that have been vandalized
to the point of being detrimental to the health and safety of the City. The
applicant/developer shall develop an approximately 6.5 acres park within
the combined Planning Area 7 & Planning Area 13.
In addition, staff has substantiated that all applicable City Departments
and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of
the Amendment No 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan and have
incorporated all applicable comments and /or conditions related to
installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications,
regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of
potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general
health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding
neighborhood or the City.
6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a less than significant
level, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding
considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project
implementation.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -_
PAGE 5 OF 6
On February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which
analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the development of
the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan area. (SCH No. 2006121069)
In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously
approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new
information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis.
However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the
certified EIR is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For
this reason, pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the
attached Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch
House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake
Elsinore, Riverside County, California, dated June 2014 and prepared by
John Minch and Associates, constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental
Impact Report No. 2007 -01.
SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council hereby approves
Spyglass Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 (SPA 2014 -01).
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of April, 2015.
Steve Manos, Mayor
City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -_
PAGE 6 OF 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Barbara Leibold, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Ordinance No. 2015 - was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337,
AMENDMENT NO. 1 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST
SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN
STREET
WHEREAS, Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, has filed an application
with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting to modify and /or remove Conditions of
Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 for a project site located within the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project "); and,
WHEREAS, the 259 -acre project site is generally located east of Camino Del
Norte at its intersection with Main Street known as the Spyglass Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the
State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections
15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines ") because the Project involves an activity which may
cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease,
permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies
(Public Resources Code Section 21065); and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007 -01 (SCH
No. 2006121069) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the
development of Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 were part of the whole action that was
analyzed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan EIR; and
WHEREAS, a "Historical and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch
House Complex Located at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside
County, California ", dated June 2014 (the "Report") was prepared by John Minch and
Associates to provide additional analysis regarding the Delaney Ranch Complex, also
known as the "Tarzan House "; and
WHEREAS, the Report was conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Report found that because "none of the
buildings or swimming pool are considered architecturally or historically significant at the
federal and state levels, there will be no adverse impacts to historic resources ";
therefore "no additional measures in conjunction with cultural resources are
recommended for the Delaney Ranch House, Pool House, Pool or Lookout "; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 16.24
(Tentative Map) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of
making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land; and,
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -_
PAGE 2 OF 5
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2014 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public
hearings, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015 -14 recommending that the City
Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code ( "LEMC ") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the
responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission
action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council
has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project
pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et
seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds
and determines that the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 is
consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the
goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
SECTION 2. The City Council, based upon a thorough review of Addendum #1
to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01, the CEQA documents, and the evidence
received to date, does determine as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved
projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that
would require Subsequent or Supplemental EIR analysis. However, some
changes or additions to the information contained in the certified EIR is
necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason,
pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the attached Historical
and Architectural Evaluation of the Delaney Ranch House Complex Located
at 523 West Minthorn Street, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County,
California, dated June 2014 and prepared by John Minch and Associates,
constitutes Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007 -01.
2. That Addendum #1 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
PAGE 3 OF 5
3. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the
analysis included in the Addendum #1, none of the conditions described in
Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Initial Study have occurred;
specifically:
SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is
compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The General Plan designates the site for a mixed land use Specific Plan.
Consistent with that designation, the revisions to the Conditions of Approval of
the Tentative Tract Map 35337 does not affect the residential land uses. The
Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the designated land use, development and
design standards, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the
General Plan, the Spyglass Specific Plan and Subdivision Map Act.
2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
The revisions to the Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Tract Map is
consistent with the land use plan, development and design standards, and
programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan.
The revisions to the Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 is
consistent with the residential land uses within the specific plan and applicable
development and design standards.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact.
The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and
agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts.
The approval will allow the demolition of an existing residence and associated
facilities that were identified for preservation and the development of a 6.5 -acre
park. The proposed revisions, together with the conditions applicable thereto,
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial,
and the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby
approves Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -
PAGE 4 OF 5
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of April, 2015.
Steve Manos, Mayor
City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Barbara Leibold, City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -_
PAGE 5 OF 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. 2015 - was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.35336,
AMENDMENT NO. 1 LOCATED ON A 259 -ACRE SITE ON THE EAST
SIDE OF CAMINO DEL NORTE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAIN
STREET
WHEREAS, Erik Lunde, Pacific Coves Investments, LLC, has filed an application
with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting to modify and /or remove Conditions of
Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, which is for Finance and Conveyance
Purposes Only, and
WHEREAS, the 259 -acre project site is generally located east of Camino Del
Norte at its intersection with Main Street known as the Spyglass Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 16.24
(Tentative Map) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of
making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code §§ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA ") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et
seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork
associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary
and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project,
no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements
which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information
are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the
Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2007 -01 (SCH
No. 2006121069) which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with Tentative
Parcel Map No. 35336 and was part of the whole action that was analyzed in the
Spyglass Specific Plan EIR.
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2014 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public
hearings, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015 -15 recommending that the City
Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 ; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -
PAGE 2 OF 4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code ( "LEMC ") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the
responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission
action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council
has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with
respect to this item.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project
pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et
seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds
and determines that the proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1
for Finance and Conveyance Purposes is consistent with the requirements of California
Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General
Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the
City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No,
35336, Amendment No. 1 for Finance and Conveyance Purposes has been made as
follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions of its design and
improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is
compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 is for financing and conveyance purposes
only. No development will be permitted as a result of approval of this map. Any
future development of the site processing and approval of a Tentative Tract
Map and related design review approvals.
2. The proposed revision of the conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 35336 will not result in any significant environmental impacts for the
following reasons:
a. No development or grading of any kind is permitted as a result of the
approval
b. The project has been adequately conditions by all applicable departments
and agencies and will not therefore, result in any significant environmental
impacts.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
PAGE 3 OF 4
SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial,
and the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby
approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of April, 2015.
Steve Manos, Mayor
City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Barbara Leibold, City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
PAGE 4 OF 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. 2015 - was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
The proposed project (Specific Plan No. 2005 -02 Amendment No. 1) is an
approximately 259.6-acre Specific Plan which would allow the development of
a maximum of 1,035 dwelling units consisting of a maximum of eight (8)
estate residential dwelling units on 7.5 acres within the Estate Residential (0-
2 du /ac) designation 515 dwelling units on 115.6 acres within the Single -
Family Residential (4 -8 du /ac) designation 222 dwelling units on 18.6 acres
within the Courtyard Homes (8 -15 du /ac) designation and 290 dwelling units
on 14.5 acres of the Multi - Family Residential (15 -20 du /ac) designation. The
Specific Plan also includes a 6.5 -acre park site 85.8 acres of open space and
11.1 acres devoted to Major Circulation. The proposed project is located
northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street on the east side of Camino Del
Norte (APN 377 - 250 -011 377 - 260 -004 005 and 006 377- 350 -004, 007, 008,
010 014 015 016 and 017).
2. These conditions of approval replace and supersede the conditions of
approval for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan that were originally approved
by the City Council on February 26, 2008,
3. Within 30 days of project approval the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records.
4. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify,
and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents
from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers,
Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the
City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the
Change No. 2005 07, and Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, Amendment No.1 for
the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan project attached -hers.
`- - - -
■- - 10-140
- -
-•- - - - -
Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
$50.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of
Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for
processing within 48 hours of the project's approval
6. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures
listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the Environmental
Impact Report for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan.
7. The applicant /developer shall comply with any /all requirements of the Lake
Elsinore Unified School District.
8. The applicant/developer shall comply with any /all requirements of the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
9. The applicant/developer shall comply with any /all requirements of the
Department of the Army Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers.
10. Any modification (i.e. changes to residential density, development standards,
housing product location, etc.) to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will
require a Specific Plan Amendment approved by the City of Lake Elsinore
City Council.
11. The applicant/developer shall comply with any /all requirements of the
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS).
13. All future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines
contained in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan,
14. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc, not addressed in the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan will revert to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and /or
Zoning Code in effect at the time future developments within the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan are proposed.
15. The applicant /developer shall provide all project - related on -site and off -site
improvements as described in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document.
Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
13.The Draft Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document shall be revised to
incorporate the feuew ^ ad f Gat ^ an e^+ ^ and ^u Ghanges
required by the olann Rg Commission am for City G^ ^ l
any corrections
and changes required by the Planning Commission and /or City Council and
these conditions of approval. A complete Final Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
document which includes the entire specific plan, shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee
within 45 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until
the Spvglass Specific Plan document and any required revisions are
administratively approved by the Community Development Director or
designee. Additionally, the Final Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan shall
incorporate the following modifications:
a. Any raised medians along Camino Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive
(Road) shall be fully landscaped and irrigated subject to the review and
approval of the City's Landscape Architect consultant and the
Engineering Division.
b. Figure IV -39 shall be revised to more clearly denote the specific
location of all masonry walls both within and on the perimeter of the
specific plan boundary.
C. The text discussion on Page 4 -68 for project walls, pilaster theme walls
and interior privacy walls shall be revised to match the design details
shown on Figure IV -35. Pilasters with decorative caps shall be
provided at property line /wall terminus and every seventy -five feet (75')
on center. In addition, no plain precision block walls shall be utilized
along any streets visible from the public within the development.
d. The text discussion on page 4 -71 and Figure IV -35 shall be revised to
denote the use of pilasters with a decorative cap to be located every
one - hundred -fifty feet (150') on center and at property line /wall
terminus along interior block privacy walls which abut private roads
within the development.
e. The text shall be revised to include a detailed discussion regarding
maintenance responsibilities for streetscapes, roads, maintained
slopes, and parks throughout the development. In addition, a
maintenance plan shall be added as a figure showing specific
maintenance responsibility areas within the development.
Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
Table V -2 shall be revised to require a minimum of one (1) guest
parking space per three (3) units. In addition, some guest parking shall
be provided for the proposed courtyard home products. The specific
number of parking spaces shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development or designee.
g All exhibits and all text shall be revised to reflect the combination of the
two parks (Planning Areas 7 and 13) into a single 6.5 -acre park site
All text and exhibits shall reflect the park improvements set forth in
these Conditions of Approval.
15. Any amendment to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan even though it may
affect only one portion of the Specific Plan shall be accompanied by a
complete specific plan document which includes the entire specific plan
including both changed and unchanged parts.
15. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines
contained in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document.
16. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and /or Zoning
Code in effect at the time future projects are proposed.
17. The applicant /developer shall participate and annex into the City of Lake
Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate.
18. A detailed noise mitigation analysis shall be performed, at the final map stage
(for individual planning areas) for all future sensitive noise uses potentially
exposed to noise levels in excess of 50dB CNEL to verify that planned noise
protection will meet City of Lake Elsinore standards.
19. The applicant /developer shall provide all project - related on -site and off -site
improvements as described in these Conditions of Approval or the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan document.
Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
20. Prior to approval of a design review or tentative map for individual planning
areas, the developer and City staff will review plans for multi - family housing
areas, commercial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary
and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
21. The developer or the developer's successor in- interest shall be responsible
for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement
and litter removal.
22. The applicant shall submit a revised Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, which
labels in the table of contents and incorporates the City Council approved
Conditions of Approval for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan within the
document.
22(a). The applicant shall submit a revised Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, which
indicates that Planning Areas 5 & 6 of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan have
a density not to exceed twenty (20) dwelling units to the acre.
22(b). The applicant shall submit a revised Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, which
indicates that plexi -glass view fencing is an available design criteria option for
fencing within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
25 An Ennrea hment Rermit shall he ..hta Red r r to any work on City aRC41..r
Conte r nht of w
Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
26. Any grading that affects "waters of the United States ", wetlands or
jurisdictional streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from
respective Federal and /or State agencies.
27. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles,
vaults, etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property
owner or his agent. All overhead utilities shall be under grounded.
28. All underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the
provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's
agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
U21-00 �M
storm runeff shall be Genta ned v.4hiR thp street right ef way. When either 9
35. All slopes and landscaping within public right -of -way, including all landscape
improvements in the public riqht- of -wav for Camino Del Norte and Elsinore
Hills Drive including all primary and neighborhood entry monumentation
signage and areas, shall be maintained by the property owner or property
owner's association or another maintenance entity as approved by the City
Council.
36. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood
control district facilities, outside the public right -of -way shall be owned and
Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
maintained by property owner or property owner's association.
- 9WRIPM -_. _ -
..,,- - - - - - — ---------
43. The applicant hall pFovide BMP'c that Will ro.J___ storm water pollutants from
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
spill WRm-
me
- 9WRIPM -_. _ -
..,,- - - - - - — ---------
43. The applicant hall pFovide BMP'c that Will ro.J___ storm water pollutants from
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
me
- 9WRIPM -_. _ -
..,,- - - - - - — ---------
43. The applicant hall pFovide BMP'c that Will ro.J___ storm water pollutants from
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
WE—
Nil
45. The appliGant developer shall construct full street improvements and dedicate
additional right -of -way on Camino Del Norte, along the project frontage, such
that the ultimate right -of -way width conforms to the General Plan street right -
of -way cross - sections. The cross section of roadway improvements with a
raised median (if applicable), parkway, street lights, and multiuse trail shall be
consistent with other proposed development on Camino Del Norte, as
recommended by the City. The road improvements for Camino Del Norte
shall be consistent with the approved Traffic Study dated April 29, 2007 and
the General Plan Circulation Plan.
46. The appliGant developer shall construct full street improvements and dedicate
the right -of -way on Elsinore Hills Road per General Plan street right -of -way
requirements. The cross section of roadway improvements with a parkway,
street lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed
development on Camino Del Norte, as required by the General Plan.
UMM
49. The appliGaRt shall irnpl8MeRt rnitigatiOR measures identified R the approved
TraffiG Study date. April 29, 2097
Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
mars
WE—
Nil
45. The appliGant developer shall construct full street improvements and dedicate
additional right -of -way on Camino Del Norte, along the project frontage, such
that the ultimate right -of -way width conforms to the General Plan street right -
of -way cross - sections. The cross section of roadway improvements with a
raised median (if applicable), parkway, street lights, and multiuse trail shall be
consistent with other proposed development on Camino Del Norte, as
recommended by the City. The road improvements for Camino Del Norte
shall be consistent with the approved Traffic Study dated April 29, 2007 and
the General Plan Circulation Plan.
46. The appliGant developer shall construct full street improvements and dedicate
the right -of -way on Elsinore Hills Road per General Plan street right -of -way
requirements. The cross section of roadway improvements with a parkway,
street lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed
development on Camino Del Norte, as required by the General Plan.
UMM
49. The appliGaRt shall irnpl8MeRt rnitigatiOR measures identified R the approved
TraffiG Study date. April 29, 2097
Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
50. The applicant developer shall construct the traffic signals at Main /115 SB and
NB on /off ramps, Camino del Norte /Main Street, Camino del Norte /Elsinore
Hills Road, Camino del Norte /La Strada.
1 11111 11M
56. The development of each Planning Area or Phase shall be subject for specific
review and conditions of approval. Note that with a completion of a Project
Study Report of the 115 /Main Street Interchange Upgrade, additional right of
way could be required along Camino Del Norte.
..,,.
_ _ _ ■nrrr.+rrm
59. The grad Rg plan shall shn,N that no struGWFes,
at d the t t that n ld d sight d'
�. nrn' no enrannno n re no c stanne '
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
Me
Me
1 Mai - e
.. -
- -
�ai■iiYir —
-
- - - -
Me
Me
1 Mai - e
.. -
- -
- - -
-
■
-
.,,.-- -
-
-.- _ . -,
_
• ' - - - -
-
WrTIMMWINFROM -
IN SAW
68.
Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Will W,
73. The traffic signals shall be installed per the approved Traffic Study dated April
29, 2007. The developer may request the completion of some signals as
determined by a specific technical study and approved by the City Engineer.
74. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required
improvements of this development shall be installed.
75. All streetscape improvements including landscaping and irrigation shall be
fully constructed along the entire length of the proposed project along Camino
Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive prior to issuance of the first building permit
within Phase 1 of project development as identified on the approved
landscape plans.
76. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development
shall be paid.
77. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with the
Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
1101
MAN* -0
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Will W,
73. The traffic signals shall be installed per the approved Traffic Study dated April
29, 2007. The developer may request the completion of some signals as
determined by a specific technical study and approved by the City Engineer.
74. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required
improvements of this development shall be installed.
75. All streetscape improvements including landscaping and irrigation shall be
fully constructed along the entire length of the proposed project along Camino
Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive prior to issuance of the first building permit
within Phase 1 of project development as identified on the approved
landscape plans.
76. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development
shall be paid.
77. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with the
Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
applicable Water District requirements.
78. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces,
landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided.
79. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the
time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained.
80. As -built plans shall be completed and signed by the City Engineer.
81. All improvement plans shall be digitized. The appGsaat developer shall submit
tapes and /or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or
developer to pay $1,000 per sheet for City digitizing the plans.
82. The Home Owner's Association or another maintenance entity approved by
the City Council is to maintain all exterior walls including those facing main
arterials (i.e. Camino Del Norte Elsinore Hills Drive etc )
83. The Home Owner's Association or another maintenance entity approved by
the City Council is to maintain all flow control /drainage facilities and
structures.
84. The applicant shall provide the City with an inventory of all street signs street
markings street trees fire hydrants etc and total square- footage of all
streets in a digital format acceptable to the City.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARMENT
■-
- - - -
Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
::
:•
MRS ■_
90. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map Site Development Plan, or
Special Use Permit (as applicable) the applicant shall consent to the
formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed
Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire
and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset
the annual negative fiscal impacts of the protect on public safety operations
and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand
five hundred dollar ($7,500) non - refundable deposit to cover the cost of the
formation or annexation process as applicable. The applicant may propose
alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts
of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City
in lieu of creating /annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services
Director at 951 - 674 -3124.
91. Prior to approval of the Final Map Parcel Map Site Development Plan,
Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable) the applicant may form
Community Facilities District to allow for the funding of (i) public facilities and
(ii) the on -goinq operation and maintenance of the public right -of -way
Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
W. M.
Me—
e 0
— -
::
:•
MRS ■_
90. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map Site Development Plan, or
Special Use Permit (as applicable) the applicant shall consent to the
formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed
Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire
and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset
the annual negative fiscal impacts of the protect on public safety operations
and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand
five hundred dollar ($7,500) non - refundable deposit to cover the cost of the
formation or annexation process as applicable. The applicant may propose
alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts
of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City
in lieu of creating /annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services
Director at 951 - 674 -3124.
91. Prior to approval of the Final Map Parcel Map Site Development Plan,
Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable) the applicant may form
Community Facilities District to allow for the funding of (i) public facilities and
(ii) the on -goinq operation and maintenance of the public right -of -way
Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and
for street lights in the public right -of -way for which the City will pay for
electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison including
Parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the
development and federal NPDES requirements ( "Maintenance Services') to
offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project Alternatively, if a CFD
is not formed pursuant to the preceding sentence applicant shall (a) form a
CFD solely for Maintenance Services or annex into an existing CFD for such
services (e.g. Community Facilities District No 2015 -2 (Maintenance
Services) or (b) the applicant may propose alternative financing
mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project with
formation or annexation process as applicable Contact the Administrative
Services Director at 951 -674 -3124.
92. The applicant shall be required to participate in the City -wide LLMD
93. The applicant shall be required to participate /annex into the LLMD District 1
for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City.
96. The Home Owner's Association or another maintenance entity approved by
the City Council is to maintain all open space areas.
-' - -
Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
102. The applicant shall provide a trails diagram outlining proposed trail locations
and utility easement locations as part of the development of the trail system.
-
1 We� M IT-7=3 01 01 M PMR
I - - - - - -
Mae-
107. The G4 Director of Community Services shall review and approve all park
development and implementation plans.
108. The City's I andscape Amh1e_+ is +n ._.._.. all IanrlC ono am /nr irrigat 'nn
7�
109. The ..,..1ioa .+ Call oal:k fees based OR the Quimby Act r .. _. ent City
GfiO�lrtzr.T ��rsrsracn.: r�r_ rmrr- rsr .�snrr�rscsr- r:���■nna..nrr_... �.0 ■�
111. The appliGant hall be required to par+"n'pa+e annev into +he I I I\ D fl;c+r:n+ 1
+nr all e.her'nr land ping to hem n+a'Red by the City.
Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
112. The I'n Gant shall h° required to aFt's at the "D hl' C-. ty" program.
'rr
113. I Gant shall t'I'z° (`Ch f n.J F the + t' f II the
rr parks
d^„
114. The appl'Gant shall n .a+ t th 4 y park r
to the Of the
115. The Home Owners Association (HOA) or another maintenance entity
approved by the City shall maintain all trails.
116. The 6.5 acre public park shall be included in the Community Facility District
for maintenance and renovation costs.
117. The following items shall be provide in the Park located on PA 7. PA 13. and
PA 4:
One (1) ball fields with backstops
Two (2) bleachers
Restroom (approximately 300 sq. ft.)
On -site parking providing 25 to 30 spaces
Three small group picnic areas with two tables and benches with
gazebo
Three (3) barbeques
Three (3) hot ash containers
Eight (8) waste containers
Two (2) drinking fountains
Two (2) half -court basketball courts
Eight (8) benches
One (1) 2 to 5 year and one (1) 5 to 12 year playground with shade
over the entire play area
Perimeter walking trail with minimum 6 exercise stations
Park Monument entry sign per City identity Standard Guide
Parking lot and walkway security lighting
Lockable entry gates into parking lot
118. The design of the public park shall provide pedestrian circulation and shall be
in compliance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements
119. Prior to submittal of construction plans the developer shall meet with the
Director of Community Services to determine the location and specifications
of the park amenities to be provided.
Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
120. Construction plans and specifications for the park shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Services prior to approval of the final
map.
121. The developer shall post security and enter into a park improvement
agreement to improve the public park prior to issuance of the first building
permit.
122. Construction of the park shall commence pursuant to a pre- construction
meeting with the developer, the developer's construction contractor and City
representatives. Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection
process my preclude acceptance of the park by the City.
123. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible
for all maintenance of the public park site, including the 90 -day maintenance
period until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the City of
Lake Elsinore.
124. The 6.5 acre public park site shall be improved and then conveyed to the City
free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would
preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes. A policy of
title insurance and a soils assessment report shall be provided with the
conveyance of the property.
125. All private parks / tot lots common areas and open space areas will be
maintained by the HOA or other maintenance entity approved by the City.
126. No park credits will be given for private facilities or private park areas.
127. Applicant shall dedicate 6.5 net acres for a public park and pay for park
improvements.
128. Park shall be turn -key and completed to the satisfaction of the Community
Services Director upon prior to the issuance of the 125th building permit.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
129. The Applicant shall comply with all of the attached Riverside County Fire
Department conditions and standards.
Planning Commission Approved Page 17 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO. 1
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
130. The Applicant shall comply with any /all requirements of the Riverside County
Sheriff Department.
(All Conditions of Approval amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning
Commission hearing regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005 -02
(Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan); with strikethrough text being deleted and underlined
text being added.)
Planning Commission Approved Page 18 of 19 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
Craig E. Anthony
Fire Chief
Proudly serving the
unincorporated
arms of Riverside
County and the
cities of:
Bmming
A
Beaumont
r�
Cahmem
J
Canyon Lake
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
hullo
I,akc Elsworc
]a Quints
11
Maroon Valley
Palm Desert
Perris
6
Rancho Mirage
San Jacinto
Temecula
Boadefslpervivmx
Bob Buster,
District 1
John Tavaglime,
District 2
Jeff Stone
DisM1ticl 3
Roy Wilson,.
District 4
Minion Ashley,
District 5
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005 -02, AMENDMENT NO.
"SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN"
Riverside CouAty
Tire Department
In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
4080 Fallon Street, Zp Floor • Riverside, Callfercda 92501 • (909) 955A777. Fax (909) 9554896
Fire Proteetwa Plenuing and Eee4nmin9 Services Seed..
City of Lake Elsinore Platting Division August 17, 2005
130 S. Main St
Lake Elsinore, Ca. 92530
Arm: Matthew Harris, Senior Planner
RE: Comments for Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
The proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact on the Fire Department's ability to
provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increased number of
emergency and public service cans due to the inneased presence of structures and population-
The pmponcntstdevelopers shall participate in the Development linpact Fee Program as
adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore to mitigate a portion of these impacts. This will provide
funding for capitol improvements such as laud, equipment pusduases, will fire station
construction
All water mains and Sue hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in
accordance with the appropriate sections of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or No
797. 1, subject to review and approval by the Riverside Comity Fire Department.
All buildings shag be constructed with Sur retardant ronfmg material as described in section
1503 of the Uniform Building Code.
Prior to approval of any development plan for lauds adjacent to open space areas, a fire
protection / vegetation management (fuel modification) plan shall be submitted to Riverside
County Fire Department for mvicw and approval. The homeowners Association or appropriate
management entity shall be responsible for maintaining the elements of the plan,
t the interest of Public Safely, the project shall provide alternate or secondary access+accesses.
Alternate or secondary access/accesses shall have concurrence and approval of both the
Riverside Comity Fire Department and the City of lake Elsinore Transportation Dept, and
shall be maintained through out any phasing.
If you have er questions, Please feel free to call.
Z-
Jorge Rodrigne4 Fire Captain (909)955 4777
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
GENERAL
The proposed project (Tentative Tract Map No 35337) proposes the subdivision
of 258.83 gross acres (APN 377 - 250 -011 377 - 260 -004 005 and 006 377 -350-
004, 007, 008 010 014 015 016 and 017) into four - hundred fifty -one (451)
single - family residential lots eight (8) estate residential lots two (2) courtyard
home lots. one (1) multi - family residential or commercial lot one (1) park lot and
twenty -three (23) open space lots The proposed proiect is located northeast of
Interstate 15 at Main Street on the east side of Camino Del Norte within the
Spyglass Specific Plan.
2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) indemnify, and
hold harmless the City, its Officials Officers Employees and Agents from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials Officers Employees or
Agents to attach set aside void or annul an approval of the City, its advisory
agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning the Tentative Tract No
36567.
3. Within 30 days of project approval the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records
The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the
County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination The check shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the proiect's
approval.
5. These conditions of approval replace and supersede the conditions of approval
for the Tentative Tract Map No 35337 that were originally approved by the City
Council on July 27 2010.
PLANNING DIVISION
6. Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 will expire two (2) years from the original July 27
2010 City Council date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has
been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City
of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (SMA).
Additional extension of time (36 months maximum time per the SMA) may be
granted with City Council approval.
Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. In addition, the map
shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval.
10. The applicant shall provide to the Community Development Director within 30
days of approval, a final approved version of the project in digitized format.
11. This project and all subsequent projects within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
boundary shall comply with the mitigation measures and the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted for this project, as printed
with Environmental Impact Report No. 2008 -07 for Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan, unless superseded by these Conditions.
12. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the MMRP through every stage of
development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall
periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant,
permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report
compliance to the City until the completion of the project.
13. The pliG nt shall prE)vde a Spyglass SpeGifip PIA A.nen.tMent Ne. 1
Executive Summary I' t' II the han that have been axle with this
approval —This %shall kn.eluele exhila ts to clarify all ..haRgees Th's GIGG nt shall
he -;ilhrnittpd to the Planning Di,,i,;igR fer revieve and approval pr or to approval 9
aRy fiRal map including TeRtative Parcel Map NAq 25226 @Rd Tentative TraGt Map
Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
T72r-r-T-72
.. - - Me 9�
00
10. The applicant shall provide to the Community Development Director within 30
days of approval, a final approved version of the project in digitized format.
11. This project and all subsequent projects within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan
boundary shall comply with the mitigation measures and the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted for this project, as printed
with Environmental Impact Report No. 2008 -07 for Spyglass Ranch Specific
Plan, unless superseded by these Conditions.
12. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the MMRP through every stage of
development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall
periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant,
permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report
compliance to the City until the completion of the project.
13. The pliG nt shall prE)vde a Spyglass SpeGifip PIA A.nen.tMent Ne. 1
Executive Summary I' t' II the han that have been axle with this
approval —This %shall kn.eluele exhila ts to clarify all ..haRgees Th's GIGG nt shall
he -;ilhrnittpd to the Planning Di,,i,;igR fer revieve and approval pr or to approval 9
aRy fiRal map including TeRtative Parcel Map NAq 25226 @Rd Tentative TraGt Map
Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document shall be revised to
incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planninq Commission
and /or City Council as set forth in the Conditions of Approval for Amendment No
1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan A complete Final Spyglass Ranch
Specific Plan document which includes the entire specific plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or
designee within 45 days of approval by the City Council No permit shall be
Director or designee.
Air Quality
14. The following measures are required to reduce project impacts relating to ROG,
NOX, PM10 and PM2.5:
• Limit the simultaneous disturbance area to as small an area as practical.
• Terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph.
• Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed.
• Water exposed surfaces and unpaved haul routes at least three times
daily.
• Cover all stockpiles with tarps when left unattended for more than 72
hours.
• Reduce speed on unpaved roads and haul routes to less than 15 mph.
• Require 90 -day low NOX tune -ups for off -road equipment.
• Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
• Require use of Tier 3 -rated engines for scrapers and dozers used in
grading.
• Require installation of soot filters on all diesel equipment > 100
horsepower.
Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Encourage car pooling for construction workers.
Limit lane closures to off -peak travel periods.
Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways.
• Wet down or cover dirt hauled off -site.
• Wash or sweep access points daily.
Encourage receipt of construction materials during non -peak traffic hours.
Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. (MM)
15. As operation - related impacts result primarily from mobile sources traveling to and
from the project site, the proposed project shall incorporate any available TCM's.
Such measures include, but are not limited to:
Providing future transit access points within the development;
Including bicycle lanes in the project design; and /or
Providing an attractive pedestrian environment. (MM)
16. This map must comply with the Development Standards and Design Guidelines
approved with the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. Construction of the property is
subject to all the Conditions of Approval of the Specific Plan unless superseded
by these conditions.
a. All lots shall comply with the minimum standards contained in the
residential Development Regulations contained in the Specific Plan, and
shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Tract
Map.
b. Where the Specific Plan is silent, Title 16 and 17 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code shall apply.
17. The @ I' Gant hall sign and return trn, _ ''APknn...dedgM8Rt of Cond do ' to the
rn n , n nc
Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
18. The Developer shall disclose to all home buyers within a 300 -foot radius of the
boundaries of the proposed park site (Lot 468) that specific recreational facilities
within the park may include the installation and operation of illumination devices.
19. Landscaping improvements shall be designed for and installed along private
Street 'JX in accordance with Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Landscape Design
Guidelines, Section 3. Said landscaping shall be maintained by the Homeowners
Association (HOA) associated with Street 'JX.
20. Trail directional signage shall be installed at both ends of private Street "JX to
assist trail users. Sign fabrication, installation and maintenance shall be
undertaken by the Homeowners Association. The specific design and locations
for the signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community
Development.
Prior to Recordation of Final Tract Map:
21. The applicant shall comply with the attached Riverside County Fire Department
conditions of approval.
22. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per
the LEMC.
23. The applicant shall submit signed letters of authorization from affected abutting
property owners in association with the proposed offsite street connections and
improvements and offsite grading.
24. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community
Development Director or designee prior to final map approval.
25. All of the improvements shall be designed by the developer's Civil Engineer to
the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore.
26. The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a homeowners'
association approved by the City, recorded and in place. All Association
documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City and the City Attorney's
Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
office, and shall be recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation and
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs). The HOA shall be responsible
for the maintenance of all open space areas and maintenance easement areas.
The HOA shall maintain or coordinate with an appropriate agency approved by
the Community Development Director, for such maintenance.
a. In the event that the Homeowners' Association fails to meet its
responsibilities with regard to the maintenance of open space areas, the
Lighting, Landscaping and Maintenance District shall automatically
provide such maintenance and assess the HOA for such service.
b. CC &Rs shall prohibit on- street storage of boats, motor homes, trailers,
and trucks over one -ton capacity.
c. CC &Rs shall prohibit roof - mounted or front -yard microwave satellite
antennas.
d. CC &Rs shall
provide for maintenance
of all slopes within the
project
boundaries to
be maintained, repaired,
and otherwise cared for
by the
HOA.
e. CC &Rs shall provide for City review and approval of any annexation or
deannexation of territory into or out of the HOA.
f. The developer shall provide landscaped areas on both sides of any
access roadways within the tract, and the landscaped areas shall be
maintained by the HOA.
g. The City shall be made an express third party beneficiary to the CC &Rs
such that the City has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce the
CC &Rs in the event that the HOA fails to do so.
h. CC &R's shall provide for the long term maintenance of private street 'JX
and associated streetscape landscaping.
27. All open space lots shall be owned and maintained by the HOA or other entity
approved by the Community Development Director and so noted on the Final
Map.
Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
28. The Final Map shall identify all street side yards and down slopes adjacent to
streets as open space lots maintained by the HOA or as HOA Maintenance
Easements. These areas shall be fully landscaped, irrigated and maintained by
the HOA.
29. All trails shall be owned and maintained by the HOA or other entity approved by
the Community Development Director and so noted on the Final Map.
30. Offsite trail connection points shall be established at such time that offsite street
or trail improvements are constructed. The trail connection points shall remain
open and passable for the public and shall be so noted on the Final Map.
Prior to Issuance of Grading and Building Permits:
Air Quality
31. Upgraded filters on the ventilation system shall be installed for homes within 500
feet of the nearest 1 -15 travel lane. (MM)
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
32. Prior to issuance of the site grading permit, the applicant or developer shall
finance the installation of up to eleven multi -level landfill gas detection probes at
intervals of 100 feet, along the northerly and northwesterly edge of the landfill
property to comply with CCR Title 27 and SCAQMD Rule 1150.1. The applicant
or developer shall coordinate with Riverside County Waste Management
Department ( RCWMD), regarding the exact location of these landfill gas
detection probes. RCWMD shall be responsible for building the probes and for
conducting periodic monitoring and maintenance of the permanently installed
monitoring probes. (MM)
33. All debris shall be disposed of off -site, in accordance with current local, state and
federal disposal regulations. When debris is removed, care shall be taken to look
for potential hidden hazardous materials within the piles. Should hazardous
materials be identified, disposal shall be in accordance with all federal and state
regulations. (MM)
34. Prior to any demolition, renovation or any other activity that may disturb suspect
regulated asbestos containing materials, either an inspection shall be performed
Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
by an accredited Building Inspector, or the affected materials shall be handled as
asbestos - containing in accordance with all federal and state requirements. If
future sampling identifies any such materials as asbestos containing materials
they shall be properly abated and disposed of by a state - licensed abatement
contractor prior to disturbance or demolition in accordance with all federal and
state requirements, including the California Code of Regulation (CCR) and the
Universal Waste Rule (40 CFR Part 9). (MM)
35. Prior to any activity that may cause lead exposure either to workers or tenants;
lead based paint sampling shall be performed in accordance with all federal and
state requirements. Should future renovation, repair or demolition disturb and
suspect paint, a lead based paint inspection and /or risk assessment shall be
conducted by a state or federally certified lead based paint inspector /assessor to
identify areas of potential tenant or worker exposure in accordance with all
federal and state requirements. Should any lead based paint be identified, such
painted surfaces shall be properly disposed of as appropriate prior to demolition,
following the requirements included in the CCR and the Universal Waste Rule.
(MM)
Noise Impacts
36. Single- family residential units abutting Elsinore Hills Drive (Planning Areas 4 -6, 9,
11 and 12) shall either establish a buffer (be sited outside of the 98 foot contour),
an acoustical barrier (wall or berm of 6 feet in height), or a combination thereof to
meet the City Noise Element 65 dBA Ldn exterior noise level threshold for
residential units. The acoustic barrier /earthen berm should be of solid
construction; i.e., such as block or glass or a combination of the two, with no
gaps or holes. (MM).
37. Residential units in Planning Area 1 adjacent to 1 -15 and Camino Del Norte shall
require a 12 -foot acoustic barrier /earthen berm to meet the 65 dBA Ldn exterior
noise threshold. Along the westernmost perimeter of Planning Area 1, the
acoustic barrier /earthen berm shall be designed to taper, from 12 -feet to 8 -feet,
to shield residential units with a direct line -of -sight to 1 -15. At the southeast
corner of Planning Area 1, the acoustic barrier /earthen berm shall also be
designed to taper from 12 -feet to 6 -feet, to shield those residential units nearest
Camino Del Norte from traffic noise. The acoustic barriers /earthen berms should
be of solid construction; i.e., such as block or glass or a combination of the two,
with no gaps or holes. (MM)
Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
3$. Residential units in Planning Are a
shall require a 10 -foot acoustic
exterior noise threshold. Along th
acoustic barrier /earthen berm sh
to shield residential units with
barriers /earthen berms should b
glass or a combination of the two,
5 and 6 adjacent to 1 -15 and Camino Del Norte
barrier /earthen berm to meet the 65 dBA Ldn
e easternmost perimeter of Planning Area 6, the
all be designed to taper, from 10 -feet to 5 -feet,
a direct line -of -sight to 1 -15. The acoustic
e of solid construction; i.e., such as block or
with no gaps or holes. (MM)
39. Upon completion of final grading plans, a supplemental noise assessment shall
be conducted to determine if the noise attenuation methods listed in Condition of
Approval Nos. 30, 31, 32 & 35 remain necessary or if other methods or design
measures can be utilized based on actual grade elevations.
40. Upon completion of final grading plans, a supplemental noise assessment shall
be conducted to confirm that individual or combination of barriers and setbacks
have reduced exterior noise to below 65 dBA and interior noise to below 45 dBA.
(MM)
41. Residential units abutting Elsinore Hills Drive (Planning Areas 4 -5, 9, 11 and 12)
shall require upgraded acoustic features capable of providing up to 23 dBA Ldn
of mitigation for second -story residential facades with a direct line -of -sight to
Elsinore Hills Drive. According to the hierarchy of structural noise mitigation listed
below, these units would require standard dual -paned windows in order to meet
the City's interior noise standard. (MM)
Exterior to Interior
Mitigation Measure(s) Needed
Reduction Desired
0 -10 dBA
None
10 -20 dBA
Close windows facing roadway.
Provide supplemental
ventilation.
20 -25 dBA
Close standard dual -paned
windows. Provide
supplemental ventilation.
25 -30 dBA
Close up- graded dual -paned windows. Baffle vents and
line ducts with absorbers.
Provide supplemental
ventilation.
>30 dBA
Custom upgrades (dual layer
drywall, triple -paned
windows, steel doors, etc.)
Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
42. Residential units in Planning Area 1 adjacent to 1 -15 and Camino Del Norte shall
require custom acoustic upgrades capable of providing up to 34 dBA Ldn of
mitigation to meet the City's interior residential noise threshold of 45 dBA Ldn.
(MM)
43. Residential units in Planning Area 6 adjacent to 1 -15 and Camino Del Norte shall
also require custom acoustic upgrades capable of providing up the 32 dBA Ldn
of mitigation to meet the City's interior residential noise threshold of 45 dBA Ldn.
(MM)
44. A supplemental acoustic analysis shall be submitted in conjunction with the
issuance of building permits for residential units adjacent to both Elsinore Hills
Drive and Camino Del Norte to verify that adequate noise protection exists in
perimeter residences to meet the City's interior residential noise threshold of 45
dBA Ldn. Since the exterior tier of development will assist in shielding interior
units, the above acoustic upgrades are needed only on the outermost tier or
development. (MM)
45. Supplemental ventilation, in conjunction with air conditioning, shall be required in
any livable space where window closure to shut out roadway noise is needed to
meet interior noise standards. (MM)
46. Should Planning Area 5 and 6 be developed as commercial land uses, residential
units abutting Elsinore Hills Drive shall be sited outside of the 118 foot contour.
(MM)
47. Upon submittal of final engineering design of the commercial uses, the project
shall incorporate all mitigation measures to minimize hours of operation and
reduce exterior noise levels resulting from potential noise source location, such
as loading docks, speakerphones, music /live entertainment, to 65 dBA Ldn from
7 a.m. to 10 p.m. These measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. (MM)
Transportation and Traffic
48. On -site traffic signing /striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed
construction plans for the project site. (MM)
49. In addition to participating in the Western Riverside TUMF program for General
Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Plan improvements, the project shall participate in the phased construction of off -
site intersection improvements through payment of established City of Lake
Elsinore fees, payment of the project's fair share traffic contribution, assessment
district and /or community facilities district financing, and construction of off -site
facilities under appropriate fee credit agreements. (MM)
50. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall participate in
the fair share traffic contribution of the Project Study Report (PSR) for the I-
15 /Main Street interchange. (MM)
51. The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all site preparation activity.
Construction shall not commence before 7:00 a.m. and shall cease at 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday,
Sunday or any legal holidays.
52. Upon violation by the applicant of the City's Noise Ordinance or the Condition of
Approval immediately previous, applicant shall cease all construction activities
and shall be permitted to recommence such activities only upon depositing with
the City a $5,000 cash deposit available to be drawn upon by the City to fund any
future law enforcement needs that may be caused by potential project
construction violations and the enforcement of the City's Noise Ordinance and
related Condition of Approval. The applicant shall replenish the deposit upon
notice by the City that the remaining balance is equal to or less than $1,000.
53. The applicant shall install a weatherproofed 3' X 3' sign at the entrance to the
project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity, and
a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City
of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674 -3124.
Biological Resources
54. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a Re-
vegetation Plan for creation of 0.51 acre of riparian or marsh habitat. The Re-
vegetation Plan shall include but not be limited to the following to ensure the
establishment of the vegetation: qualitative and quantitative performance
standards, map showing the re- vegetation areas, site preparation information
including grading requirements type of planting materials (e.g. species ratios,
source, size material, etc.), planting program, success criteria including target
functions and values, and detailed cost estimate. The cost estimate shall include
Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
all phases, including but not limited to, planting, plant materials, irrigation,
maintenance, monitoring and report preparation. The report shall be prepared by
a qualified restoration ecologist/biologist and subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director. (MM)
55. The re- vegetation shall occur on property known as the "Cloverleaf' in the
southern end of Lake Elsinore or other offsite mitigation parcels acceptable to the
City. If the mitigation at the Cloverleaf property is not available, 0.51 acre of
mitigation shall be provided at an alternative site or mitigation bank (the
mitigation bank must have creation credits available), shall be approved by the
Community Development Director, and must meet the following criteria:
The site shall be part of a larger block of conserved habitat, or in an area
that is targeted for conservation by the MSHCP. Specific locations could
include Temescal Wash, proposed Core 1 and Core C of the MSHCP, or
other appropriate sites surrounding Lake Elsinore.
Hydrology shall be appropriate to allow for fully functional wetland habitat
for habitat restoration.
For areas adjacent to Lake Elsinore, the pre- mitigation elevations shall be
above 1,260 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) for areas outside of the
Back Basin levee, or above 1,246 feet AMSL within the Back Basin levee
to insure that the mitigation site is not considered jurisdictional habitat
prior to implementation of the mitigation program. (MM)
56. Habitat created pursuant to the Re- vegetation Plan shall be placed within an
open space easement dedicated to the City or transferred to the RCA subject to
a Donation Agreement prior to or immediately following the approval of the Re-
vegetation Plan. (MM)
57. The applicant shall enter in a Secured Agreement with the City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division consisting of a letter of credit, bond, or cash for implementation
of the Re- vegetation Plan. (MM)
58. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to approval of the Final Map (or
Parcel Map) the applicant shall provide the Community Development Director
with a copy of a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit issued by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and a copy of a Streambed Alteration Agreement issued by
Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
the California Department of Fish and Game (or evidence that no permit or
agreement is required) for all project - related disturbances of any streambed.
(MM)
59. Due to the presence of suitable habitat onsite for the western burrowing owl, a
qualified biologist shall conduct pre- construction focused species surveys within
30 -days prior to any ground disturbing activities at the project site where suitable
habitat is present. If burrowing owls are determined to occupy the project site
during pre- construction surveys, CDFG shall be consulted and a passive
relocation program shall be undertaken to relocate owls to an area outside the
impact zone. The relocation shall be conducted following accepted protocols and
would occur outside of the breeding season for the burrowing owl. Existing
burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. (MM)
60. To avoid impacts to nesting migratory birds, including raptors, the removal of
potential nesting vegetation (i.e. trees, shrubs, ground cover, etc.) should be
avoided during the nesting season, recognized from February 15 through August
31. If vegetation removal must occur during the nesting season, a qualified
biologist shall conduct a migratory nesting bird survey to ensure that vegetation
removal would not impact any active nests. Surveys must be conducted on more
than three days prior to vegetation removal. If active nests are identified during
nesting bird surveys, then the vegetation used for nesting shall be avoided until
the nesting event has completed and the juveniles can survive independently
from the nest. The biologist shall flag the occupied vegetation and should
establish an adequate buffer (e.g., construction fencing) around the occupied
vegetation. The size of the buffer would be based on the type of bird nesting (i.e.,
raptors shall be afforded larger buffers). Clearing /grading shall not occur within
the buffer until the nesting event has completed. (MM)
61. The project shall pay appropriate MSHCP fees for impacts to the following animal
and plant species covered by the MSHCP: coastal California gnatcatcher,
Southern California rufous - crowned sparrow, Belding's orange- throated whiptail,
red - diamond rattlesnake, San Diego black - tailed jackrabbit, long - spined
spineflower and Payson's jewel flower. (MM)
62. To reduce impacts to the Stephen's kangaroo rat, the project shall pay Riverside
County SKR Habitat Conservation Plan Fees of $500 per acre to reduce impacts.
(MM)
Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Cultural Resources
63. Prior to issuance of grading permit(s) for the project, the applicant shall retain an
archaeological monitor to monitor all ground- disturbing activities in an effort to
identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural
resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. (MM)
64. At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall
contact the appropriate Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the
monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the
Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The
Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the
designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors
during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and
development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final
disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains
discovered on the site. (MM)
65. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the project archeologist shall file a pre -
grading report with the City and County (if required) to document the proposed
methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the
requirement for a qualified archeological monitor to be present and to have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the
agreement required in Condition of Approval No. 58 above, the archeological
monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation
with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any
archeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be
allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and
shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation
with the project archeologist. (MM)
66. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County
Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to
California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in
place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and
disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the
remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall
be contacted within a reasonable timeframe. Subsequently, the Native American
Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely
descendant shall then make recommendations, and engage in consultations
concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code
5097.98. (MM)
67. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including
sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the
project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. (MM)
68. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be
avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. MM)
69. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are
discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the
appropriate Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet
and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the Developer and the
Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these
issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for
decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources
and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the
appropriate Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the
decision of the CDD shall be appealable to the City of Lake Elsinore. (MM)
70. Prior to any grading at or near the vicinity of (P -33 -3278 also known as SRS -781-
2), the Developer shall meet and confer with the appropriate Tribe to develop an
appropriate controlled grading plan. The purpose of the controlled grading at and
around the site is to afford the opportunity to determine whether any subsurface
resources are associated with the site and if so, the significance of any such
resources. All such controlled grading shall be monitored according to the
provisions of the Agreement required in MM 4.4 -2 shall apply. Further, if
subsurface resources are discovered at the site, the provisions of MM 4.4 -2
through 4.4 -7 shall apply. (MM)
71. Any easements for grading provided to off -site developers shall be subject to the
provisions of MM 4.4 -2 through 4.4 -8. (MM)
72. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified
School District under the provisions of SIB 50, wherein the owner or developer
Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
shall pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of
a certificate of compliance by the District.
73. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the
subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be
delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
74. All storm drains are to be maintained in accordance with the cooperative
agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District.
a. The homeowners' association shall maintain water quality basins,
landscaping, and open space drainage.
75. The developer shall submit plans to the electric utility company to layout the
street lighting system. Decorative street light fixtures shall be utilized throughout
the Specific Plan boundary as specified by the Specific Plan document. The cost
of street lighting, installation, and energy charges shall be the responsibility of the
developer and /or the Association until streets are accepted by the City. Said
plans shall be approved by the City and installed in accordance with City
Standards.
76. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company.
77. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company.
78. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility
company.
79. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during
construction.
80. The applicant shall comply with any /all requirements of the California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans).
81. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to
installation.
Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
82. Landscape Plans for the tract shall include vegetative screening of all retention
basins and both sides of service roads and drainage easements.
83. All streetscape improvements including landscaping and irrigation shall be fully
constructed along the entire length of the proposed project along Camino Del
Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive prior to issuance of the first building permit within
Phase 1 of project development as identified on the approved landscape plans.
84. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation
activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with
associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all
grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the
City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts
greater than sixty feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion
control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and
labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough
graded.
85. The project shall provide primary and secondary access through all phases of
development. Before combustible materials are brought to the site, the applicant
shall provide two points of access acceptable to the Riverside County Fire
Department.
Prior to Design Review:
86. All future structural development associated with this map requires separate
Design Review approval.
r
�• • _ _ _ _
Planning Commission Approved Page 17 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
90. Elevation drawings for Design Review shall include four -sided architectural
features for both the first and second story. The applicant may submit to the
Community Development Director or his designee, for review and approval,
evidence that a particular elevation is hidden from public view and not visible due
to elevation changes. In those instances, to be determined by the Community
Development Director or his designee on a case -by -case basis, this condition
may be waived.
91. Architectural designs shall include the mitigation measures that reduce noise with
mechanical ventilation and dual glazed windows as required by the MMRP.
92. All disturbed portions of natural open space areas shall be re- vegetated in
accordance with applicable Specific Plan provisions and shall be maintained until
established.
93. Slopes on individual lots that are in excess of three feet in height shall be
installed, landscaped and irrigated by the developer prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
94. Down slopes adjacent to streets shall be maintained by the HOA.
95. A detailed fencing plan shall be required for review and approval during the
Design Review process.
96. The applicant shall install walls and fencing along the perimeter of the
subdivision in accordance with the approved Design Guidelines for the Spyglass
Ranch Specific Plan.
97. Where perimeter walls separate the project from existing residences, the walls
shall be installed prior to the commencement of construction of models and
production units, to minimize construction noise and dust impacts to adjacent
residents as much as possible.
98. Where views to open space are important, the applicant shall provide the
appropriate view fencing.
Planning Commission Approved Page 18 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
99. Plans shall include the design of noise barrier walls required as mitigation
measures for the project. Appropriate landscaping shall be required to soften the
visual impact of these walls.
100. A detailed construction phasing plan shall be submitted for review and approval
during the Design Review process.
a. Construction phasing plans shall include the location of construction
fencing for each phase.
b. Construction phasing plans shall indicate primary and secondary access
and the location of all utilities for each phase.
c. Construction phasing plans shall be designed to avoid construction traffic
from entering occupied neighborhoods to the greatest extent possible. For
safety purposes construction phasing plans shall also be designed such
that new residents can avoid traveling through construction areas.
101. Primary and secondary access roads for each phase shall be fully constructed
and open to the public prior to the issuance of the Certificates of Occupancy for
each phase of the tract.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Prior to the approval of the final Tract Map, unless other arrangement is
indicated, the applicant shall complete the following or have plans
submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted:
102. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be
required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is
substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less
than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still
be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be
conducted before grading begins.
103. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant is to provide to the City
with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export
material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer. Haul route plan shall be included as a separate sheet of the grading
Planning Commission Approved Page 19 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
plan set. Haul route shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
104. Export sites within the Lake Elsinore City limits are required to have a City
approved grading plan and permit prior to receiving material.
105. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City and /or State
right -of -way.
106. Any grading that affects "waters of the United States ", wetlands or jurisdictional
streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from respective
Federal and /or State agencies.
107. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults,
etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his
agent. All overhead utilities shall be undergrounded.
108. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the
provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's
agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
109. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County
Standards and at locations to be determined by City Engineer.
110. The applicant shall coordinate with Riverside Transit Authority for location and
installation of bus transit facilities.
111. The applicant shall execute all permit agreements, post required permit security
and pay all development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP,TIF,
K -Rat and Area Drainage Fees.
112. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm
runoff shall be contained within the street right -of -way. When either of these
criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided.
113. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County
Flood Control District Standards.
114. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
Planning Commission Approved Page 20 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
notes delineated on 8 '/2' x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled
and approved.
115. All slopes and landscaping within public right -of -way shall be maintained by the
property owner or property owner's association or another maintenance entity
approved by the City Council.
116. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control
district facilities, outside the public right -of -way shall be owned and maintained by
property owner or property owner's association.
117. Provide Engineering Division with a recorded copy of the Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions (CC &R's) and /or other documentation in confirmation of
Condition of Approval Nos. 109, 110 & 112).
118. Applicant shall develop and activate a Home Owner's Association over the estate
lots to provide for the maintenance of the private street /sidewalk on Street "JX
119. All lots within the estate lots area shall take access from Street "JJ ".
120. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR &R Inc. for removal
and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of
construction.
121. A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify
storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed
off -site and onsite drainage facilities; and include a capacity analysis verifying the
adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that
runoff from a 10 -yr storm of 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed
condition is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same
storm frequency. Both 6 hour and 24hour storm duration shall be analyzed to
determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired
results.
122. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All
Planning Commission Approved Page 21 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
off -site drainage, if different from historic flow, shall be conveyed to a public
facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance,
or conveyed to a drainage easement.
123. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street
curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
124. The applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect, including the
submittal for plan check of a preliminary Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project.
Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project.
125. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provide to
residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as
well as other environmental awareness education materials on good
housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and
met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES
Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more.)
126. The applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from
parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more.)
127. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and
discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm
water ordinances prohibi t the discharge of waste into storm drain system or
local surface waters. This includes non -storm water discharges containing oil,
grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water
Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are
available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways - without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver— is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
128. The applicant shall construct full- street improvements from the Main
Street /Camino Del Norte intersection to the Camino Del Norte /Elsinore Hills
Road intersection, half -width improvements from the Main Street /Camino Del
Norte intersection to the northern boundary of the property and dedicate full right -
Planning Commission Approved Page 22 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
of -way on Camino Del Norte such that the ultimate right -of -way width conforms to
General Plan and Spyglass Specific Plan right -of -way cross sections. Concerning
the full- street improvements on Camino Del Norte from the Main Street /Camino
Del Norte intersection to the Camino Del Norte /Elsinore Hills Road intersection,
the City shall impose upon the developer of the South Shore project the
obligation to reimburse applicant the South Shore developer's fair share of the
full street improvement costs if applicant constructs the full street improvements.
In addition, the City shall provide applicant impact fee credits and
reimbursements, as provided in Condition of Approval No. 4,36 142. If the
developer of the South Shore project is issued a rough grading permit by the
City, before the applicant is issued a rough grading permit by the City, then the
South Shore developer shall construct the full street improvements on Camino
Del Norte, and the applicant shall provide to the City proof of reimbursement to
the constructing party for the applicant's fair share of the costs to construct the
full street improvements prior to issuance of a grading permit. The cross section
of roadway improvements with a raised median (if applicable and if applicable,
applicant shall pay cash -in -lieu of construction of 1/2 the raised median), parkway,
street lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed
development on Camino Del Norte, as recommended by the City. The road
improvements for Camino Del Norte shall be consistent with the Traffic Analysis
(revised) dated August 18, 2009 (revised) and the General Plan Circulation
Element, the Spyglass Specific Plan, and shall be built to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
129. The applicant shall construct half -width street improvements within the map
boundaries and dedicate the full right -of -way on Elsinore Hills Road per General
Plan and Spyglass Specific Plan and shall be built to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. The cross section of roadway improvements with a parkway, street
lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed development on
Camino Del Norte, as required by the General Plan and Spyglass Specific Plan
and shall be built to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
130. Provide Pedestrian activated (push button) flashing beacons in advance of the
trail crossing on Elsinore Hills Road.
131. All trail crossings shall be marked with a standard cross walk striping as defined
in the MUTCD.
132. The applicant shall construct full width street improvements and dedicate the
Planning Commission Approved Page 23 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
right of way on "A" to "D" Streets, 'AX to 'HH" Streets as shown on the map
and /or per design guidelines in the Specific Plan.
133. The applicant shall be responsible for acquiring right -of -ways in which the
applicant or the City has no legal title or interest. If the applicant is unsuccessful
in acquiring such right -of -ways, the City could assist the applicant in the Eminent
Domain process at applicant's cost.
134. All streets shall be constructed per adopted City Standards. Any deviation from
City standards shall be approved by the City Engineer.
135. The applicant shall implement mitigation measures identified in the Traffic
Analysis dated August 18, 2009, as specified in Section VIII. B (1) and (2) and
Figure 84 of this Study to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
136. The applicant shall provide fair share costs, as approved by the City Engineer, if
the ultimate road improvements are not subject to TUMF or established City of
Lake Elsinore fees for the ultimate road improvements as follows:
a. Main Street /115 Ultimate Interchange Upgrade and Project Study Report,
Camino Del Norte(offsite) to La Strada and, Franklin Street to Main Street
connection.
137. The applicant shall construct the traffic signals at Main /1 -15 SIB and NB on /off
ramps. The City shall provide TIF or TUMF credit to the applicant. If TIF or
TUMF credits are not sufficient to insure that applicant's cost of construction of
these signals do not exceed applicant's payment of TIF or TUMF for these
signals, the City shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with applicant to
reimburse applicant for the difference between applicant's cost to construct the
signals minus the issued TIF and TUMF credit and the amount of TIF or TUMF
payment the applicant otherwise would be obligated to pay.
138. The applicant shall install a one -way stop sign on Street "B" at the Camino Del
Norte /Street - "B" intersection (as shown on TTM 35337). However, if the criteria
for traffic signal warrants are satisfied prior to the issuance of the final certificate
of occupancy for the project, the applicant shall immediately remove the stop
sign and install a traffic signal at this intersection. Otherwise, the traffic signal
shall be installed and operational prior to the issuance of the final occupancy.
Planning Commission Approved Page 24 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
139. The applicant shall participate in "fair share" payment of offsite improvements if
the off site improvements are not subject to TUMF or established City of Lake
Elsinore fees, specified in Table 10 of the Traffic Analysis dated August 18, 2009
(revised) as specified in Section VIII. B (1) and (2) and figure 84 in this study to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
140. The applicant shall submit street improvement plans prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer and the plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, ac
pavement, street lighting, median, trail, and drainage improvements.
141. The applicant shall provide signing and striping plans for the required
improvements of this project. The plans shall also incorporate traffic calming
measures on local streets.
142. A portion of the required improvements for this development may be covered
under the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) or Area Drainage Fee program. Request for
fee credits, or reimbursement, if fee credits are insufficient, shall be approved by
the City Engineer and based on allowable costs in the fee program and
availability of funds.
143. This project shall provide trail and roadway connections to adjacent
developments unless otherwise deemed unfeasible as concurred by the city. The
trail cross section shall be per County standards unless otherwise approved by
the City Engineer.
144. The development of Planning Area 1, 5, 6, 10, and 12 or shall be subject for
specific review and conditions of approval. Note that with a completion of a
Project Study Report of the 115 /Main Street Interchange Upgrade, additional right
way could be required along Camino Del Norte.
145. The applicant shall submit a WQMP of the project for City's review and approval.
146. The Parcel Map (TPM 35336) shall be recorded.
147. The Tract Map shall include the phasing boundaries consistent with the parcels
of the Parcel Map. The phasing boundaries or parcels shall be processed as
separate tract maps.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
Planning Commission Approved Page 25 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
148. The applicant shall submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and
Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the
City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion downstream
caused by development of the site and /or diversion of drainage.
149. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are
located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance.
150. The applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report including street
design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with
recommendations.
151. An Alquist - Priolo study shall be performed as necessary on the site to identify
any hidden earthquake faults and /or liquefaction zones present on -site.
152. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements and /or permits for off -
site grading, improvements, and /or drainage acceptance from the adjacent
property owners prior to grading permit issuance
153. The applicant shall provide a copy of an encroachment permit or any approval
documents from the Riverside County Flood Control District and /or Caltrans for
encroaching, grading, or discharging into County flood control facilities or
Caltrans right of way.
154. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and
he /she shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion
control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured.
155. The applicant shall provide erosion control measures as part of their grading
plan. The applicant shall ensure protection of storm water quality and meet the
goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage
Area Management Plan.
156. The applicant shall provide the city with a copy of the waste water discharge
identification (WDID) letter as proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System ( NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention
plan prior to issuance of grading permits.
Planning Commission Approved Page 26 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
157. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes
BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance
responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and
approval.
158. The applicant shall provide for City plan check approval a haul route plan as part
of the grading plan set. In addition, a focused Traffic Mitigation /Management Plan
related to construction activities shall be provided.
159. The applicant shall provide the City a copy of the Southern California Edison
Letter of Non - Interference (SCE NIL) prior to grading permit issuance.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
160. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of this
development and as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior
to building permit.
161. All street improvement plans, traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans shall
be completed and approved by the City Engineer per the Traffic Impact Analysis
dated August 18, 2009, as specified in Section VIII.B (1) and (2) and figure 84 in
this study.
161a Prior to the issuance of the first building permit in the oroiect, the applicant shall
prepare an irrevocable reciprocal access agreement assuring permanent access
to "JX Street for Lots 436 through 442 in a form approved by the Citv Attornev
and recorded in the official land records of Riverside County. (Added by the
Planning Commission at its March 17, 2015 hearing.)
162. The applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division
from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements
have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water
service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter
prior to applying for a building permit.
163. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees
and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34).
Planning Commission Approved Page 27 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Prior to Occupancy
164. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of onsite and /or off -site
public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83 -78). All fees and requirements
for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
165. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of off -site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
166. The traffic signals shall be installed per the Traffic Analysis (revised) dated
August 18, 2009 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
167. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required improvements
of this development shall be installed.
168. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved
plans or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
169. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development
shall be paid to include the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of
Elsinore Hills Drive and Camino Del Norte.
170. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water
District requirements.
171. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces,
landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided in the form of the
recorded CR &Rs and /or other City acceptable recorded documentation.
172. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time
when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained.
173. As -built plans shall be completed and signed by the City Engineer.
174. All improvement plans shall be digitized. The applicant shall submit tapes and /or
discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or developer to pay $1,000
Planning Commission Approved Page 28 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
per sheet for City digitizing the plans.
175. The WQMP "Water Quality Management Plan Covenant and Agreement' or
other City acceptable documentation shall be executed and recorded
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
176. Prior to approval of the Final Map Parcel Map Site Development Plan or
Special Use Permit (as applicable) the applicant shall consent to the formation of
a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities
District No. 2015 -1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement Fire and Paramedic Services
Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal
impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the
City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-
refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process as
applicable. The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund
the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and
maintenance issues in the City in lieu of creating /annexing into a district Contact
the Administrative Services Director at 951 - 674 -3124.
177. Prior to approval of the Final Map Parcel Map Site Development Plan Special
Use Permit or building permit (as applicable) the applicant may form Community
Facilities District to allow for the funding of (i) public facilities and (ii) the on -going
operation and maintenance of the public right -of -way landscaped areas and
neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public
drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements
( "Maintenance Services ") to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the
proiect. Alternatively, if a CFD is not formed pursuant to the preceding sentence
applicant shall: (a) form a CFD solely for Maintenance Services or annex into an
Planning Commission Approved Page 29 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
existing CFD for such services (e.g. Community Facilities District No. 2015 -2
(Maintenance Services) or (b) the applicant may propose alternative financing
mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project with respect
to Maintenance Services. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred
dollar ($7,500) non - refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or
annexation process as applicable. Contact the Administrative Services Director
at 951-674-3124.
PARKS s RcrocATION 13cPARTME4T COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
178. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or
exhibits the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedent.
179. The Home Owners Association (HOA) or another maintenance entity approved
by the City Ceuncal shall maintain all trails.
180. The 6.5 acre public park (Lot 468) shall be Convey °c' to the City and °"a" be
included in the Community Facility District for maintenance and renovation cost.
182. The following items shall be provided in the Park located on PA 7 PA 13, and PA
4 (also known as Lot 468):
One (1) ball fields with backstops
Two (2) bleachers
Restroom (approximately 300 sq. ft.)
On -site parking providing 25 to 30 spaces
Three small aroup picnic areas with two tables and benches with gazebo
Three (3) barbeques
Three (3) hot ash containers
Eight (8) waste containers
Two (2) drinking fountains
Two (2) half -court basketball courts
Eight (8) benches
Planning Commission Approved Page 30 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
One (1) 2 to -5 year and one (1) 5 to 12 year playground with shade over the
entire play area
Perimeter walking trail with minimum 6 exercise stations
Park Monument entry sign per City identity Standard Guide
Parking lot and walkway security lighting
Lockable entry pates into parking lot
183. The design of the public park (Lot 468) shall provide fer pedestrian circulation
and aopess for the disabled throughout the park. shall be in compliance with
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements
184. Prior to submittal of construction plans the developer shall meet with the Director
of Community Services to determine the location and specifications of the park
amenities to be provided.
185. Construction plans and specifications for the park shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Services prior to approval of the final
map.
186. The developer shall post security and enter into a park improvement agreement
to improve the public park prior to issuance of the first building permit
187. Construction of the park shall commence pursuant to a pre- construction meeting
with the developer, the developer's construction contractor and City
representatives. Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection process
my preclude acceptance of the park by the City
188. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for
all maintenance of the public park site (Lot 468) and slope�landsGaping areas
including the 90 -day maintenance period, until such time as those responsibilities
are accepted by the City of Lake Elsinore.
189. The 6.5 acre public park site (Lot 468) shall be improved and dedicated then
conveyed to the City free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements
that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes. A
policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall be provided with the
conveyance of the property.
190. All private parks / tot lots, common areas, and open space areas will be
Planning Commission Approved Page 31 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
maintained by the HOA or other maintenance entity approved by the City.
191. No park credits will be given for private facilities or private park areas.
192. Applicant shall dedicate 6.5 net acres for a public park and pay for park
improvements.
193. Park shall be turn -key completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services
Director rip or to the issuance of the 100th Atiep, m -and. upon
ec-GUpaRGY 125th building permit.
(All Conditions of Approval amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning
Commission hearing regarding Amendment No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 35337;
with strikethrough text being deleted and underlined text being added.)
Planning Commission Approved Page 32 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
In cooperation with the
California Department of Forxsay and Fire Protection
2300 Market St, Ste 150, c Riverside, CA 92501 • (951) 955-4777 . Fax (951) 9554886 -
PROUnLY SERVrNG
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- PARCEL & TRACT MAPS
THE
aNWCOnaaanTEO
PERMIT NUMBER: 10- LE- TR35337
-I--
CouNrvauo TBEIOE
REVIEWED BY: AFM DANIEL WAGNER ON July 14, 2010
:
SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN MAP
BANNING
BEAUMONT
APPLICANT: MATT HARRIS, SR. PLANNER, 130 S. MAIN ST, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92562 951
CAUMEEA
674 - 3124 X 279 FAX 951471-1419 EMAIL: mharris(dlake- elsinore ore
C
10. - GENERAL CONDITIONS
COACHELLA ACHELLA
DESear HOT
10. FIRE. 999PC - #01- West Fire Protection Planning Office Responsibility IN EFFECT
SPRINGS
iNOIAN WELLS
It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward them to all interested
INDIP
parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence.
I-AaE E!SNONE
Additional information is available at our website: \mvw.tvcfire.ora go to the link marked "Ordinance 707'.
LIQUa rA
MEwrEE
Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Fire Protection Planning Division
at 2300 Market St. Suite 150, Riverside, Ca 92501. Phone: (951) 9554777, Fax: (951) 9554886.
MORENO VALLEY
PALM DESEar
10.FIRE.999 CASE -CITY CASE STATEMENT IN EFFECT
Pen's
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the
RANCHO W.A.I.
following fire protection measures be provided In accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and for
recognized fire protection standards:
euRiooux Cso
SANJACINTO
10.RRE.999 MAP #50 -BLUE DOT REFLECTORS IN EFFECT
TEMECULA
Blue retire reflective pavement markers shall he mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways
WROOMnn
to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the
Riverside County Fire Department.
BOARD OF
10.FIRE.999 MAP` -#16- HYDRANT /SPACING - IN EFFECT
SUPERVISORS:
sou BLISTER
Schedule A fire protection approved standard ere hydrants, (6"x 4 "x 2 7:) locate one at each street
DISTNLC,' r
intersection and space no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage
JOIIN TAYAGUONE
more than 165 feet from hydrant Minimum fire flow shall be 1000GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI. Shall
DISTRICT2
include perimeter streets at each intersection and spaced 660 feet apart.
JEEI$ ONE
DISIRICT3
JOHN BENOR
OISTRICI 4
MARIONASHLEY
DISTNICI 5
77 -933 Las MUntafias, Palm Desert, CA 92211 • (760) 863 -8886 • Pax (760) 863 -7072
0\ aaenNand SemgshwaNV. fyDwnmenls \Cortdifiane \Conditloos2VJil:L GLSWORE \Ie LCTR35lJi Rr44oro.aa
Page 1 of 3
Planning Commission Approved Page 33 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
% PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION
50.FIRE.999 MAP- i164- ESGDRIVEWAY ACCESS
IN EFFECT
ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following Note: Driveways exceeding 150'm length, but
less than 800' in length, shall provide a turnout near the midpoint of the driveway. Where the driveway exceeds iffly tumuuts
shall be provided no more than 400 'apart. Turnouts shall be a minimum of l0'wide and 3(1 length, with a minimum 25'taper
on each end. Approved turnaround shall be provided at all building sites on driveways over 30(r in length, and shall be within
50' of the building.
50.FIRE.999 MAP473- ESC - DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE
IN EFFECT
ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following Note: Access will not have an up, or
downgrade of more than 15 %, (access will not be 16'm width per the 997 UFC, Article 9, Section 902.2.2.1) and will have
vertical clearance of 15'. Access will be designed to withstand the weight of 60 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will
have a turning radius of 5' capable of accommodating fire apparatus.
50.FIRE.999 MAP -#67- ESC -GATE ENTRANCE
IN EFFECT
ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surv)yorwith the following Note: Gate entrance shall beat least two feet
Wider than the width of the traffic lanes serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located
at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Here a
one -way road with a single Traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40'tuming radius shall be used.
50.FIRE.999 MAP -#88- ESC - AUTO /MAN GATES
IN EFFECT
Esc map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following Note: Gate (s) shall be automatic or manual
minimum 20 feet in width. Gate access shall be made equipped with a rapid entry system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to installation automatic7manual gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30'
pounds. Automatic gates shall be equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall
remain open until closed by the rapid entry system.
50.FIRE.999 MAP- #004 -ECS -FUEL MODIFICATION
IN EFFECT
ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following Note: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,
the developer shall prepare and submit to the fire department for approval a fire protection/vegetation management that should
include but not Pulled to the following items: a) Fuel modification to reduce fire loading, b) Appropriate fire breaks according to
fuel load, slope and terrain. c) Non flammable walls along common boundaries between rear yards and open space areas shall
be provided at intervals not to exceed 1500'. e) A homeowners association or appropriate district shall be responsible for
maintenance of all fire protection measures vhthin the open space areas. ANY HABITAT CONSERVATION ISSUE
AFFECTING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FUEL MODIFICATION REQUIREMENTS, SHALL HAVE CONCURRENCE WITH THE
RESPONSIBLE WILDLIFE AND /OR OTHER CONSERVATION AGENCY.
50.FIRE.999 MAPS446 -WATER PLANS
IN EFFECT
The applicant or developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature him*, and shall conform to hydrant type,
location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Department for signature.
77 -933 Las Momam,, Palm Desert, CA 92211 • (760) 863 -8986 • Fax (760) 863 -7072
cannr�meoa,�a serrns :wwamwry oW�m�n�srco „ataonslco�aamn :zu.nrcr: ErswoxaloaE- Ta353377- 14.2010.do.
Page 2 of 3
Planning Commission Approved Page 34 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35337
WITHIN THE SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
50.FIRE.999 MAP - #53- ESC -WTR PRIOR/COMBUS IN EFFECT
ECS map must be stamped by Riverside County surveyor with the fallowing Note: The required water system, including fire
hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency poor to any combustible building material placed on
an individual lot.
80. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
80.FIRE.999 MAP- #50-TRACT WATER VERIFICATION IN EFFECT
The required water system, including all fire hydrant (s), shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the
Riverside County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Riverside
County Fire Department at phone number 951 9555282 to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surface, and all
primary and/ orsecnndary access. Approved water plans must be at the lob site.
77 -933 Las MonlaBas, Palm DescrS CA 92211 • (760) 863 -8886 • Fax (760) 863 -7072
C:VMcwnrnU and ScttingssawarJVv(y 0u4mnmu \Candilions\COndilio�2\LgKa MSWORtm O- M'- TR35337 ]�14�2010.doc
Page 3 of 3
Planning Commission Approved Page 35 of 35 City Council
March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015