HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-17-2009 NA
MINUTES
NUISANCE ABATEMENT HEARING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2009
CALL TO ORDER
The regular Nuisance Abatement Hearing was called to order by Robin Chipman,
Code Enforcement Manager at 4:37 PM.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Tom Weiner.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: CHAIRWOMAN: WATTS
PRESENT: PLANNING MANAGER: WEINER
PRESENT: CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER: CHIPMAN
Also present were: Code Enforcement Officer Fred Lopez and Office
Specialist Joyce Teyler.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. The following Minutes were approved.
Minutes for October 21, 2008
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairwoman Loraine Wafts opened the Public Hearing at 4:39 p.m.
2. Vacant lot on Machado. APN 379-140-073. LAKE ELSINORE, CA
Agenda Item No
Page of
PAGE 2 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 2009
Chairwoman Watts asked Code Enforcement Officer Lopez to speak regarding
I the case.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez indicated the property was brought to his
attention by a neighboring property owner who stated there was a big Eucalyptus
tree on the lot. He stated upon further inspection he had noted there was one big
Eucalyptus tree that the property owner feared would fall over onto his property.
He commented he initiated a case via a Notice of Violation which he mailed to
the current property owner on record. He said the property owner was listed out
of Glendale, California. He indicated after he received no response from the
Notice of Violation and subsequent Warning Notice, he felt he had only one
option but to take the property to nuisance to have the tree abated. He
commented the City had adopted a new tree preservation ordinance which
allowed the City to remove dead or diseased trees based on the fact they create
a public hazard. He stated it was his recommendation to have the property
declared a public nuisance and clear the way for the City to make arrangements
to have the tree removed before any damage was caused.
Chairwoman'Watts asked if he had heard from the owner.
_ Code Enforcement Officer Lopez stated he had not.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated he had spoke with the
complainant,several weeks ago. He stated the lot with the tree was owned by an
older, absentee owner. He commented the complainant had been taking care of
the property and cleaning it up but was now tired of doing it.
Chairwoman Watts asked if he was doing it on his own.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated he was doing it on his own. He
asked if it was adjoining his property.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez stated yes. He indicated you could not tell
where one property line started and the other one ended. He commented the
actual property runs through his property as well as neighboring properties
behind him. He said upon looking at it, it appeared to be an easement and the
neighboring property advised him it was an easement for the water district but he
could not find any information to prove it so all the information was sent to the
property owner of record.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman asked how big the tree was.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez indicated it was approximately forty-five to fifty
feet. He stated he was going to contact the Public Works/Weed Abatement
Agenda Item No
Page__ of
PAGE 3 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 2009
n Program to check on the ordinance to see if we could use them for the tree
removal.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman asked if there was any documentation
which indicated the tree was dead or diseased. He also asked if it looked bad.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez indicated it looked dead. He commented there
was a tree next to it that the property owner also complained about but it was
green and the leaves were green. He stated the tree in question looked
completely dead. He said there were no green leaves and it had the appearance
of a dead tree.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated from the complainant's side
there were two trees in question not on his parcel.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez concurred.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman asked if he agreed the one was the
biggest problem.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez indicated when he looked at the trees, one was
clearly dead and the other was not. He stated he did not make the tree that was
not dead an issue even though he wanted that one removed as well. He
commented we were not in the business of removing live trees unless it created
some type of hazard.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated he was not sure if they needed
to go an extra step to make sure. He stated he was not an arborist. He
commented he could tell if something looked dead but he was not sure if they
needed to go the extent of having the tree examined by an arborist to actually
show it was diseased or dead before we removed it.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez stated that was why he was going to get with
Public Work's. He indicated Public Works had been notified by the neighboring
property owner but they felt it was not in their interest to address the situation so
it was turned over to him. He commented he was going to go back to them with
it being declared a nuisance. He stated according to our new ordinance the City
was going to, have to do something to act upon it.
Planning Manager Weiner indicated the tree team that worked over at the yard
would have a good idea if the tree was diseased or damaged due to dealing with
City trees.
Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated we clearly had the right to
remove the tree if it was diseased or dead. He commented him not being an
Agenda Item No
Page of
PAGE 4 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 2009
arborist he was not sure whose explanation would be that it was dead. He stated
he felt Planning Manager Weiner was correct and we should be able to rely on
our crew that dealt with trees all the time. He asked if it was a Eucalyptus.
Code Enforcement Officer Lopez stated yes.
MOVED BY BOARD MEMBER WATTS, SECONDED BY CODE
ENFORCEMENT MANAGER CHIPMAN AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO DECLARE THE
VACANT LOT AT VACANT LOT ON MACHADO, APN 379-140-
073, LAKE ELSINORE, CA, A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
3. Code Enforcement Comments:
None.
4. Nuisance Abatement Board Comments:
Chairwoman Watts asked if we would get more cases with the weed
abatement. Code Enforcement Manager Chipman indicated we would be
bringing forth more nuisance cases.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY CHAIRWOMAN LORAINE WATTS TO ADJOURN THE
NUISANCE ABATEMENT HEARING AT 4:45 P.M. UNTIL MARCH
17, 2009.
Chairwoman, Loraine Watts
Respectfully, Submitted,
i ,Joyce M. Teyler
Office Specialist II
Agenda Item No
Page of
PAGE 5 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 2009
I I ATTEST:
I
Robin Chipman, Secrets to the Board
I1
Agenda Item No
Page of