HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd. No. 2004-1121
ORDINANCE NO. 1121
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 93-3, AMENDMENT NO.7, AN AMENDMENT FOR THE
REMOVAL OF PARCELS WITHIN APPROVED LIBERTY
SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN 370-050-
013.
WHEREAS, the Alesco Development LLC, has initiated proceedings to remove APN's 370-050-
013 from the Liberty Specific Plan therefore triggering Amendment No.7 to the Liberty Specific Plan.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
May 4, 2004 made its report upon the desirability of the proposed project and made its recommendations
in favor of said Amendment No. 7 to SP No. 93-3 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No.
2004-53 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan No. 93-3, Amendment No.7; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the City Council has
considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties
at a public hearing held with respect to this itt~m on May 25,2004;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed Specific Plan No. 93-3,
Amendment No.7, prior to making a decision to approve the proposed amendment to the Land Use
Designation and establish a Zoning Designation. The City Council finds and determines that Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2004-03 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of ends City
Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Specific Plan No. 93-3, Amendment No.7 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health,
safety, comfort or general welfare ofthe persons residing or working within the neighborhood of
the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in
the neighborhood or within the City.
The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potentiality
to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working
within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issues identified by staff
relate to the Land Use and the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Staff, concluded, based
on the Net Traffic Generation Forcast, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, that the traffic
impacts of this land use change will reduce the traffic impacts to Corydon Street.
2. The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the
area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent
properties.
Ordinance No. 1121
Page Two
The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment will allow the applicant to develop the site
with the proposed 70,000 square foot industrial building and will in turn bring about a site more
compatible with the previously approved projects along Corydon Street to the west.
3. The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and
usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints.
The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment would establish a usage more in
conformance with the recently approved Industrial Condominium project to the west and will
subsequently be more in character with the subject properties location, access and constraints.
4. The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
The proposed Specific and General Plan Amendment was included within the description of the
project's Initial Study. Based on the Initial Study, staff intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, which concluded with mitigations that the project will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final
passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be
published and posted in the manner required by law.
INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 25th day of May, 2004,
upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY
NONE
NONE
NONE
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 8th day of June,
2004, upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY
NONE
NONE
Ordinance No. 1121
Page Three
ATtEST: . ~
2)k d
Vicki Kasad, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE)
I, VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and read by title only on the 25th day of
May, 2004, and presented for second reading by title only for adoption on the 8th day of June,
2004, and approved, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE,
SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
~
. \AB~~AJt'I:. JCOUNCILMEMBERS:
?J~",-- J;~
VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
NONE
NONE
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE)
I, VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy
of Ordinance No. 1121 of said Council, and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
~~~ooe 1~:Oj
VICKI KAS~ITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE. ELSINORE
(SEAL)