HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd. No. 1990-902ORDINANCE NO. 902
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING THE SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE
RAMSGATE DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
(the "City") has previously certified an Environmental Impact
Report No. SCH 83071309 (the "EIR") with respect to the
Ramsgate Development (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the City has caused a Supplemental EIR (SCH
88090525) and an Addendum to the EIR to be prepared which
addresses the chages to the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has caused a Negative Declaration
90-6 with Mitigation Measures, to be prepared which reduces
significant adverse impacts to levels of insignificance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has previously
reviewed the EIR, the Supplemental EIR, the Addendum and the
Negative Declaration and has recommended that the City Council
(1) certify that the Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the City's CEQA Guidelines; (2)
approved the amended Specific Plan for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Environmental
documents prepared in accordance with the California Quality
Act, and has considered the information contained therein and
in the other documents referred to therein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously certified the
Supplemental EIR and the Addendum to the EIR and has made the
findings required by Section 1509 (a) of the State CEQA
Guidelines, and has reviewed the Negative Declaration with its
Mitigation Measures, attached hereto as Attachment A.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES ORDAIN THAT:
Section 1: Upon the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and based upon the findings adopted hereby with
regard to the approval of the Project, the City Council hereby
(i) finds that the Second Amendment to the Specific Plan for
the Project area attached hereto as Attachment B is consistent
with the General Plan of the City, (ii) finds that the
adoption of the Specific Plan is in the public interest, (iii)
approves and adopts the Second Amendment to the Specific Plan,
and (iv) approves and adopts the Negative Declaration 90-6
Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Attachment A.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty
(30) days after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall
certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this
Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by
law.
Page 2
Ordinance No. 902
PASSED UPON FIRST READING this 14th day of August,
1990, by the following called vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMIN;UEZ, STARKEY, l!INKLER, IJASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE.
ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August,
1990, by the following called vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK DOMINGUEZ STARKEY WINKLER WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS:
...Y .... .u ~uu, ~.i ~.y ..ictn
City of Lak Elsinore
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEAGITY:
`-IJ~V~V
John R. Harpe it ttorney
City of Lake is nore
NONE
NONE
NONE
C
. Washburn, Mayo
of Lake Elsinore
OFFICE USE ONLY
Negative Declaration No.
Project: T.T.M. 25831
Attachment A
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
1. Developer or Project:
Contact Person: Don Clurman
Address: 455 Linden Street
City: Laeuna Beach CA Zip: 92651
Telephone Number:. ( ) 497-3707
Environmental Information Prepared by: xunsaker & Associates
Address: 3 Hughes
Clty: Irvine CA Zip: 92718
Telephone Number: ( ) 583-1010
3. Proposed Pro~ect
Title: entative Tract Map
Location: AP 347-11-24.25.26
90-6
Total site acreage: Gross: 50.0 Net:
For Residential Project:
Number of units: 201
Dwelling units per acre: 4 du/gross acre
Unit sizes (square feet):__ N/A
Attach brief description of proposed project, including
intended use, and phasing of project, or if present
project is a phase or portion of a larger project.
List and describe any other related permits and other
public approvals required for this project, including
those required by local, regional, state, and federal
agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire
department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District.
Environmental Setting:
Attach a description of the existing environmental
setting of the project site and surrounding pro-
perties, including information on topography, geo-
logy, soil stability, plants, animals, and any
cultural, historical, or scenic aspects.
GENERAL
EXISTING LAND USE ZONING PLAN
Project site
Vacant 2
Surrounding
North Vacant
2
Surrounding
East Vacant ~ ) )
Surrounding
South Vacant ~ ~~
Surrounding
West Vacant ~'~
6. Energy Conservation (Attach zesponsee to the following):
A. Describe how solar access rights of adjacent pro-
perties are protected by the project design.
B. Describe any anti clpeted use, or provisions for,
active or passive solar systems or designs in the
proposed project, including building, lot, or street
orientations, shading, lot size, or other provisions.
C. Describe any other proposed use of energy conserva-
tion measures, including geothermal, cogeneration
facllitles, super-insulation, provisions in regard
to prevailing breezes, etc.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The following checkllet shall be reviewed with Planning
Division staff to determine potential environmental
impacts. For all questions checked "Yes" or "Maybe,"
responses shall be prepared addressing why the project
tll not negatively impact the environment, or mltiga-
:.g measures employed in the project design to elimi-
.te these impacts. o e: If all significant environ-
mental impacts are not mitigated, en Environmental
impact Report (EIR) is required.
Please cite sources for the information provided. Foz
complex projects or projects in sensitive environmental
areas, professional environmental coneultnnts and
specialists should be employed.
YEB HAYBE NQ
1: Earth. Hill the proposal result
in .
a. Unstable earth conditions or /
in changes in geologic sub-
structures? -
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or ovarcovering //
of the soil? -
c. Change in topography or /
ground surface relief J/
features? _
d. The destruction, covering
or modification of any
unique geologic or physical
features? -
e. Any increase in wind or /
water erosion of soils, /
either on or off the site? -
f. Changes in deposition or
erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, depo-
sition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a rives
or stream or the bed of the j
ocean or any bay, inlet or /
lake? ~ _ -
g. Exposure of people or pro-
perty to geologic ~hnzazds
such as earthquakes, land- /
slides, mudslides, ground //
failure, oz similar hazards?
z~ MAYBE ~ YFS naxBS ~s
h. Construction on land with 4. Plant Life. WS11 the proposal
slopes in excess of the ten / result 1n?
(10)~percent3 y
a. Change in the diversity of
2. Air . Will the proposal result species, oz number of any
Sn? species of plants (including /
trees, shrubs, grasc, crops, ~I
a. Substantial air emissfone and aquatic plants? -
or deterioration of ambient /
air quality? b. Reduction of the numbers of ~
any unique, tare or endan-
b. The creation of objection- / gered species of plants? -/
able odore7 /
- c. Introduction of new epeciee
e. Alteration of nix movement, o! plants into an area, or
moisture or temperature, or
~ in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of axieting /
any change in climate, either V
locally oz regionally? species? -
3. Water. Will the proposal result d. Reduction in acreage of any ,
in7 ~ - agricultural crop? - - -
n. Changes Sn currents, or the 5. Animal Lile. Will the proposal
course oz direction of water result in:
movements, in either marine
or fresh waters? a. Change in the diversity of
- species, or numbers of any
b. Changes in abeorptlon rates species of animals (birds,
drainage patterns or the land animals including
rate and amount of surface / Yeptiles, fish and shell-
water runoff? / fish, benthic organisms or
- - - / insects? - Y -
c. Alterations to the course
or flow of flood waters? •// b. Reduction of the numbers
- of any unique, rate or
d. Change in the amount of ~ endangered species of
~~
surface water in any water nnimale7 =
-
body7
c. Introduction of new species
e. Discharge into surface of animals info an area, or
waters, or in any alters- result in a barrier to the
• tion of surface water ~ migration or movement of
~
quality, including, but animals? /
not limited to, tempera-
/
d. Deterioration to existing
ture, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity? Pish or wildlife habitat? ="
f. Alteration of the direction 6. Noise. Will the proposal
or rate of flow of ground / result in:
water? /
- a. Increases in existing
g. Change in the quantity of noise levels? _
ground waters either
through direct additions b. Exposure of people to
or withdrawals, or through severe noise levels? •_
interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations? / e. Location of dwelling units
- within 600 feet of a Fres-
~•
h. 6ubstantial reduction in the way? ~
amount of water otherwise
7.
Light and Glare. Will the
available for public water proposal produce new light
supplies?
- or glare? y
1. Exposure of people or pro-
S.
Land Use. Will the proposal
perty to water related result in:
hazards such as flooding /
or tidal waves? :! n. Substantial alteration of /
Flood Zone Designation: the present or planned /
land uea of nn area? JJJ _
_
300-Yesr Flood Levsl:-_
b Conflict with any desig-
nations, objectives, oz
policies of any adopted
plans of the City.
9. Natural Resources. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of
any nonrenewable natural
resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the
proposal involve:
a. Storage, handling, or '
processing of hazardous
materials?
b. A risk of en explosion or
the release of hazardous
substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesti-
cides, chemicals or radia-
tion) in the event of an
accident or upset condi-
tions?
11. Population. Will the proposal
alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an
area?
12. Housing. will the proposal
affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation.
Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial
additional vehicular move-
ment?
b. Effects on existing park-
ing facilities, or demand
for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon
existing transportation
systems?
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation
or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to water-
borne, rail or air
traffic?
f. Increase in traffic
hazards to motor vehicles
bicyclists or pedestrians?
]E$ YB
J
v
V
V
/ /
//
_ .IL.
16. Public Services. Will the
proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new
or altered governmental
services 1n any of the follow-
ing areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
e. Schools?
d. Parks or other recrea-
tional facilities?
e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental
services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts
of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in
demand upon existing
sources of energy, or
require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal
result in a need for new
systems, or substantial alter-
ations to the following utili-
ties:
.a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health. will the pro-
posal result in:
a. Creation of any health
hazard or potential
health hazard (exclud-
ing mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to
potential health hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal
result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the
proposal result Sn the crea-
tion of an aesthetlcal.'
offensive 61te open to _
view?
x~ MAYBE
_ J
_/
V/
J
_ f
_ //
_ /
__ _ l
J
xE~ MA YBE rs
19. Recreation. Will the propo-
sal result in an impact upon
the quality or quantity of j
existing recreational oppor-
tunities? ~~
20. Cultural Resources.
n. Will tae proposal result
in the alteration of or
the destruction of a pre-
historic or historic arch-
eological site? _ /
_ Y
b. Will the proposal result
in adverse physical or
aesthetic effects to a
~
prehistoric or historic ~/
building, structure or
object?
c. Does tae proposal have the
potential to cause a physi-
cal change which would
~
effect unique ethnic eul- ~
'~ tural values? _ _
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or
sacred uses within the /
potential impact area? _ _
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
I.
II.
YES MAYBE NO
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wild-
life population to drop below
self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental
l
? /
goa
s
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
All of the above must be answered "no" for a negative
declaration to be issued.
DETERMINATION•
~_ The proposed project should not have a significant
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration
will be prepared.
Although the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant effect on the environment, it will not in this
case because of the attached mitigation measures.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
The proposed project may have a significant effect
on the environment. An EIR is required.
III.
REVIEWED BY~ gd~~~ DATE: W ~ ~
PLANNING DIRECTOR ATE• Z T
1-23-86
TABLET "' t';'tCEg J~~ --
MITIGATION MONTI'ORING PROGRAM ~ ~ ~ ~`' 1 ~ 199f'
Plan;:;a p~,..
DATE: 6/1ll90
Verification of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Milestone
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. 'ILelossofapproximately 1.5 acres ofriparian habitat
shall be mitigated per the requirements of the ACOE
(per Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) and the
CDFG (per Section 1603 of the California Fish and
Game Code).
Developing the area would remove most of the exist-
ing vegetation and eliminate the natural animal and
plant communities typical of the sage habitats in south-
ern California. This direct loss of plant cover would
result in indirect environmental impacts by changing
water drainages in the area and the loss of protective
cover and forage for various wildlife species.
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers,U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Cak-
fornia Department of
Fish and Game, City En-
gineer, Community De-
velopment Director
Priortoissuanceofgrad-
ing permits.
It is difficult ro reduce impacts on the natural biota
resulting from any extensive grading in the area; and
as amitigation measure, theprojectsitewillprovide a
natural open space area, a manufactured open space
area, greenbelt auras as well as a passive park. This
would not fully rprrtpensate for the biotic ktss, but
would certainly be preferable to a total kiss of all
existing habitat. Information wasbased on a zoologi-
cal report prepared by Ultrasystems Enviromnental
Services completed in Jtme 1990.
2. Based on Stephens'kangarooratassessmentprepared Community Priatoissuanceofgrad-
by O'Farrell Biological Consulting and City of Lake Devek>pment Director ing permits.
Elsinore, Stephens' kangarooratoccupied hab[tatmap
(scale2,000~datedApri16,1990,noStephens'kanga-
roorat habitat has been identified on project site.
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6/11/90
Responsible for Mitigation
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Milestone
2.
Verification on Stephen's kangaroo rat survey pre-
pared by O'Farrell Biological Consulting dated May
29,1990.
Project site has no biological justification to be in-
cluded within a study area -the area is highly dis-
turbed,low gnalityhabitat, and surrounded byexpand-
ingdevelopment. Withoutthedisturbance,thishabitat
is marginal and cannot manage to support a significant
population of SIQ2.
3. A black tailed gnatcatcher nest was found on site;
since this species tends to be secretive, only two
individuals were sighted of this small bird.
The area is highly disturbed, low quality habitat and
sumounded by expanding development. Without the
disturbance, this habitat is marginal and cannot man-
age to support a significant population of the bLtck
tailedgnatcatcher. U.S.Fishandwildlifearecurrentiy
studying the status of this species in southero Califor-
niaandwilldecidewithin ayearwhethertochangethis
population's classification from category 2 to more
protected status.
No formal mitigation process has been established
from the City of Lake Elsinore or the County of
Riverside for the preservation of this species. This
information wa4 based on a zoological analysis pre-
pared by UltrasystemsEnvironmental Services Dated
June, 1990.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Community
Development Director
Prior toissuance of grad-
ing permits.
Verification of
Compliance
4. Impacts on mpptor foraging areas and sensitive wild-
life species, including the California gnatcatcher,
orange-throated whiptail, and San Diego horned liz-
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MTTIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6!11/90
Verification of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigatioe Measures Monitoring Mikstoce
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (rnntinued)
ard, if found on site, shall be partially mitigated by the
setting aside of approximately 1.1 acres of open space.
However, this mitigation does not reduce the impacts
on these species to a level below significant. Addi-
tional mitigation for this loss of habitat and sensitive
species is not available on the project site, therefore,
the lossofforagingareas willbea significantunavoid-
able direct impact of the project.
The proposed developmettt plan would necessitate
extensive grading. This grading would result in the
removal of all of the existing vegetation. No rare,
threatened, or endangered plant species occur on the
site. Thesefindingswerebasedonaplantandvegeta-
tion assessment prepared by Ted L. Hanes, Ph. D.,
consulting botanist on June 4,1990.
Community Prior to approval of
Development Director grading plans.
EARTH RESOURCES
1. All loose alluvium, colluvium, and fill soils shall be City Engineer boring grading
removed to expose firm natural ground. The base of operations.
these removals shall be inspected and approved by a
qualified geologist
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6111/90
Verification of
Responsible for Mitigation Comp6aoce
Mitigation Messores Monitoring Milestone
EARTH RESOURCES
2. All surface drainage shall be directed away from the City Engirrcer Priar to issuance of
topsofslopesand/abuildingfoundations. Pondingof grading permits.
water in these areas shall not be allowed.
3. All stracwres shall be designed in accordance with the Chief Building Official Priar to issuance of
curremUrtiformBuildingCodeandtheseismicdesign grading permits,
parameters of the Structural Engineers Association of
California.
4. Grading design guidelines specified in the Ramsgate City Engineer Prig to issuance of
Specific Plan shall be reflected on grading Plans, grading plans.
5. All grading and earthwork shall be performed under City Engineer During grading
the observation of a geotechnical engineer, to ensure operations.
proper subgrade preparation, selection of satisfactory
materials, and placement and compaction of all struc-
tural fill.
6. An erosion control plan shall be submitted. City Engineer Prig m issuance of
grading permits.
HYDROLOGY
1. Subsequent hydrology studies shall be prpeared indi- City Engineer Prior to issuance of
sating how project grading in conjunction with the grading permits.
drainage conveyance system (including applicable
swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm
drains, and flood water retarding) will allow building
pads to be protected from inundation from rainfall
runoff that may be expected from all storms up to and
including the theoretical 100.yeaz flood.
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MTI'IGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6/11/90
Verificatioe of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Milestone
TRANSPORTATION AND CII2CULATION
1. The developer shall participate in afair-share funding City Engineer Prior to issuance of any
program for the upgrade of State Route 74 W urban ceroiFcate of occupancy
arterial (134 foot right of way). permit.
2. The developer shall participate in a fav-share funding City Traffic Engineer, Prior to issuance of any
progam to prnvide, as determined by the city traffic Chief Building Official certificate of occupancy
engineer, a coordinated set of traffic signals. permit.
NOLSE
1. An acoustical analysis report shall be prepared that Chief Building
.analyzes exterior areas of residential uses that are Official
affected by noise levels in excess of 65 d6 CNEL.
Mitigation measures with acoustical reports shall be
reflected in building plans, if required.
Prior to issuance of
building permits.
2. Dwelling units within a 65 dB CNEL contour, except Chief Building
detachedsingle-familydwellingc,shallbedesignedto Official
meet the California Sound Transmission Control Stan-
dards, whichrequire interiornoiselevels fiomexterior
noise sources to not exceed 45 dB CNEL in any
habitable room.
Prior to issuance of
building permits.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Based on a record search performed by Arehaeologi- City Engineer Prig to issuance of
calAssociates,Ltd.,noprehistoricorhistoricarchaeo- grading permits.
logical sites are recorded within the boundaries of the
study area Since areatonably thorough investigation
has failed to reveal the presence of any potentially
significant cultural resources on the property, ra fur-
ther mitigation measures in conjunction with cultual
resources aze recommended.
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MTTIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6!11/90
Verifreation of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Milestone
AESTHETICS
1. Project site will conform to landscape design guide- Community Prior to approval of final
lines as provided by the Ramsgate Specific Plan. Development Director landscape plan.
2. Streetlightingshallbedesignedpercityrequirements. City Engineer Prior to approval of the
All other lighting shall be designed so as to confine final Tract map.
direct rays onsite.
3. A comprehensive set of architectural design guide- Community Prior to issuance of
lines shall be approved. Development Director building permits.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
1. The project proponent shall enter into an agreement Riverside County
with the Riverside County Sheriffs departmentestab- Sheriff Department,
lisping the fair-share funding amount to provide Sher- City Engineer
iff services to project site.
Prior to approval of final
tract map.
2. A fuel modification plan shall be prepared and in- Chief Building Official
stalled.
3. A final water service plan for the project site shall be Elsinore Valley
approved. Municipal Water
District, City Engineer
4. The project shall comply with the water conservation Elsinore Valley
method provided in the State of California Water Municipal Water
Resources Board Health and Safety Code Sections District
17921.3 and 4047.
Priortoissuanceofbuild-
ing permits.
Prior to approval of final
map.
Prior to building permit.
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MTfIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6/11/90
Verification of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigation Measures Momitoring Milestone
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILTTIES (continued)
5. Finalwaterplansshallbedesignedformaximum Elsinore Valley Prior to approval of
day demand plus fire demand Municipal Water final map.
District, Riverside County
Fire Department
6. A loop water line system shall be tied to the Elsinore Valley Prior to approval of
existing or proposed Ramsgate project water Municipal Water District final map.
line.
7. Thedevelopershalldesignandconsttuctallb~kbone Elsinore Valley Priortoissuanceofbuild-
water facilities prior to bringing any highly combos- Municipal WaterDistrict ing permits except for
tible materials into the area or indemnify the City. Chief Building Official model homes.
8. The developer shall extend all water lines to project Elsinore Valley Pricer to approval of final
bomdaties as required. Municipal WaterDistrict map.
Chief Building Official
9. Areduced-pressure-principle backtlow device shall Elsinore Valley Priortoapprovaloffmal
be provided for any irrigated landscaped areas within Municipal Wa-erDistrict -map.
the project and shall be reflected on the final water Riverside County Fire
plans. Department
10. Thedevelopetshallparticipateinafair-sharefunding
to expand the regional treatment plat[[ to accommo-
date the project sewage treatment demands.
11. Alloffsitesueetimprovementextensionsshallrequire
sewer line extensions within the new street section.
ElsinoreValley Price to recordation of
Municipal any teat[ map.
Water District,
City Engineer
ElsinoreValley Prior to approval of a
Municipal final tract map.
Water District,
City Engineer
TENTATIVE TRACT 25831
MTTIGATION MONTI'ORING PROGRAM, CONT.
DATE: 6/11/90
Verification of
Responsible for Mitigation Compliance
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Milestone
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTII.ITIES (continued)
12. The developer shall enter into an agreement which Community Prior to recordation of any
indicates that the need for school services within the Development Director tract map.
project site will be met through funding mechanisms. Lake Elsinore Unified
School District
13. The developer shall satisfy all park requirements Community Services Prior ro issuance of certi6-
through a combination of park site dedications and in Director Cate of use and occupancy
lieu of park improvement fees. permit,
-{ TYPICAL SEC-T{IONS
TRELLIS LANE "~~ fiD HIW-iHELL13 LANE .e.4
AND STREETS "C" - "H" ANDeST~~ElS "Q^~6 ^B"
""~ow,~
~' .r
TRELLIS IANE AND "C' STREET
IMxvnm
_ a ~
RAMSGATE ORNE .___.-___._.._._____
- ~;
I y \~==-'C'~~~V ~ ~sC)) ~ ~1~,
i.,.. ~\ r~ w-"i^""Imw.~m..~mn'Yif°'~e "`~-~ II
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
rasonxnEaraumrwwna a
~XM M N 1PVx5xm 69 W IX. MIgE ~ wEB~
l,E Fx Nrvu4 W] 1Elu[wt x wuE164E Muim'. C4¢gPow
SLOPE DESIGNATIONS
® w.v~.. .w W.aFw+oerww~om~nsrsmcunw
® aw..wEO..w.EO,w.fussoewaw
Attachment B
~~
O
~ati,E~
STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP
^~ ~
` roHOa~~ w e'imss~.v~o.'e.1M w.uva~ummce.
~
\ ~ fT Itd1A] ~ W9pMTwem ECF WDCg44NfdMMEi
y
\\
t
/ ,~RfM6P' ~
'
~ ~pW~Me fP RCFxWf
%
xl
S, / _
oar
E S VICINITY MAP
~~
'
/
P ~
rt
oA~
p
.,/
,g
~
'
3 / W.O.Zfl93-_ -
GROSSAREq 30.BdC.t- ~
y
j......
Q' CONTWRINTERVAL_1'_ ~
tr:
~
/ TOTAL LOT313`~~rA. ~® „ m
k
~
~
% PREPARED FOB: PBEPABED BY: F
i
_ fi_T_~254TS-- _-_ ~ _ ~ i ~
~ i ~ I j I ~
I
m
The Gurlnan Company. Inc.
Real Estate Development
S IJSW artn
vem.eea.unmi
99oL'%eh'S
n ttw.tmt
..~..~4w
..
.
p
2(~~5~ /~57 ~p2
41511V Il Ga Il 0 V LS ~
/~
~r
~QL=~1l~J Il
~IOO o 25831
AVESTING TENTADVE TRACT MAP 3
As approved and modified
by City Council Ordinance
No. 902