Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-03-2006 NAHMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: 6:05:24 PM Chairman O'Neal called the Regular Planning Commission Meeting to order. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Tom Weiner led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: O'NEAL, GONZALES, ZANELLI, FLORES, MENDOZA Also present were: Planning Manager Weiner, City Engineer Seumalo, Deputy City Attorney Santana, Senior Planner Harris, Associate Planner Carlson, Associate Planner Coury, Project Planner Miller and Office Assistant Arsi Baron. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Non-A~endized itemsl Ms. Donna Franson President of the Lake Elsinore Citizens Committee, reminded the commission that on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 7:00 pm in the Lakeside High School auditorium, there will be a candidate's forum. Invitations were mailed to all interested in running for the two empty council seats this fall. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes. Regular Planning Commission Minutes of August 1, 2006. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 BY THOSE PRESENT, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 1, 2006. BUSINESS ITEMS Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - CK"I'OBER 3, 2006 2. Public Convenience and Necessity (PCNI Notification of State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Target Store Location at 18287 Collier Avenue (Oak Grove Shoppin¢ Center). Chairman O'Neal requested the reading of the staff report. Planning Manager Weiner stated that Target would only be selling wine; however approval of this will allow them to sell beer in the future. Tazget representative, Beth Abalafia, 260 California Street, San Francisco, is present. Commissioner Flores questioned her regazding ABC training of employees. Ms. Abalafia stated that all cashiers obtain ABC training prior to the start of employment. Employees were trained on how to check identification, how to handle customers, and watching for fraudulent identification. Commissioner Mendoza questioned whether Menifee or Murrieta have a type 201icense. Ms. Abalafia stated that she did not know. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES AND, PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0. BASED UPON STAFFS PRESENTATION, THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (PCN) WILL BE SERVED BY THE BEER AND WINE SALES AT THE TARGET STORES, AND TO APPROVE THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY LETTER ADDRESSED TO ABC, IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FORM ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO FORWARD THE PCN LETTER TO ABC AFTER THE DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Reclamation Plan No. 2006-O1. Pacific A~ere¢ates, Incorporated (Pacific Aggregates) a wholly owned subsidiary of Pacific Clay Products Incorporated (Pacific Clavl, has submitted an application for approval of a Reclamation Plan fora 211.40-acre mining site. 6:14:56 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing and requested the reading of the staff report. Planning Manager Weiner introduced Project Planner Coury to the Commission. Project Planner Coury stated that Pacific Aggregates, Inc. is requesting review and approval of a Reclamation plan known as, Nichols Canyon Mine. The Reclamation plan outlines how Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 3 -PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 mine lands will be reclaimed, rehabilitated and re-vegetated. The plan has been reviewed pursuant to State law, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 14.04 and the Alberthill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. The site is located in the northern part of Lake Elsinore, adjacent to Interstate 15 Freeway. The goal of the reclamation plan is to restore the mine lands to a useable condition, compatible with the underlying zone and general plan. The mining~activities will be broken down into multiple phases and when each phase is complete, Pacific Aggregates will begin reclamation activities for that portion of the project. The life of the project is expected to be 3-5 years for mining activities and reclamation with the implementation of Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigation monitoring, reporting program and conditions of approval, all potentially significant environmental impacts have been Mitigated to a level of insignificance. Planner Coury went on to say that any appeal process associated with this project is given 10 days to file. Staff met with the applicant throughout the process to discuss changes to the conditions, a memorandum has been submitted, including hours of operation which will be 7:00 am to 12:00 am. Gerald R. Chapman 28437 El Toro Road is concerned regarding dust as well as noise and blasting. Tim Fleming, a General Plan Advisory Committee member, is concerned why the Committee was not made aware of this project. Mr. Fleming stated the Committee would like to see an access road for the trucks removing debris. Robert Lesser, 27785 El Toro Road, is concerned regarding the time frame of working until midnight; will there be light pollution and what will the residents complaint format be once the mining operation begins. How many trucks will be used? Will residence access to the school and canyon through Nichols Road be compromised? He stated the residents would like more information on the scope of the project. Randy Hopola, 27560 Lindell Road, concerned about getting to the school through Nichols Road that is the only way in and out. He stated being against this project because of the noise echoing off the canyon. Randall Seegert, 27590 Lindell Road, indicated his concern with the hours of operation. He questioned the number of trucks that will be used. What kind of aggregate mining will be done? What kind of dust control will there be and is it dangerous? Liddie Walker, 18078 Carmela Court, was also concemed with the hours of operation and concerned about traffic on Nichols Road. Janet Tim, 28045 Lindell Road, stated her concern about the location of the project and air quality. She asked if this project will compromise the health of the children at the school and the residents with the air pollution this project will cause. Agenda Item No Page of PAGE 4 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 Associate Planner Koury addressed a few of the resident's concerns regarding the plan. He stated the mining activity of the site is a vested right by the property owner; the city only has authority over the reclamation of the site, in terms of the finished grade and the re- vegetation to a natural state. The site is being mined for the resources, shell, and clay and there is no intention to mine for asphalt or concrete. Once the project is complete the site will be rough graded to a state complying with the underlying zoning. The site can then become a commercial operation or business. Notices were sent to residents within 300 feet of the site, so if you are outside of that area you did not receive notice, but there is a notice posted on project site. There is a Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with-the project that identified and looked at several environmental concerns and issues. Air quality or dust was identified and the document was distributed to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Comments were sent back regarding the Reclamation plan and those comments were incorporated to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Traffic circulation associated with the project was identified and a document was sent to Cal-Trans. There will be 400 truck trips associated with the project, future commercial activity that may occur from the site could generate up to 1600 trips per day, in and out of a future commercial site. A condition for modification proposed by the applicant is the existing hours of operation, limiting the mining reclamation activity from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. The applicant is identifying truck trips hours of operation. No hauling of aggregate material from the site to Pacific Clay on Nichols Road shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am - 9:00 am and 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. No truck traffic shall occur on Sundays or legal holidays. Extractive activity will be restricted between the elevations associated with the site 1650 down the hill to 1310 and shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 am -7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. Processing activity (crushing, conveying, washing, separating and loadings of aggregates) shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 am to 12:00 am Monday through Friday. Processing activity will also be permitted on Saturday between 7:00 am - 7:00 pm; No processing or extractive activity shall occur on Sundays or legal holidays. Associate Planner Koury further indicated that a sign will be posted at the entrance of the site that would identify the approved days and hours of operation, and a phone number for complaints. Pacific Aggregates, Incorporated representative Tom Tomlinson was present. He stated that hillside grading will be limited to daylight hours and the actual operation at lower elevations will be lit with lights that only shine within the site. On October 19, 2006, Mr. Tomlinson indicated that he will make a presentation to the School Board regarding the project and work with the School District to take into consideration the hours of operation and school functions. 7:00:29 PM Chairman O'Neal closed, Public Hearing and requested Commissioner's comments. Agenda I[em No. Page of PAGE 5 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 Commissioner Mendoza questioned whether the site will be secured in order to prevent off- road riders from entering the site.. He also stated that he would also like to see signs one in English and one in Spanish regarding the open pit and slope. Commissioner Mendoza also questioned inspectors being available for local residents claiming the blasts are cracking their foundation. Mr. Tomlinson responded that seismographs are put near and around the operation (blasts). He also stated there will be very little if any detectable ground motion. Commissioner Mendoza also indicated he would like the hours of operation to only be Monday through Friday and not on the weekend. Mr. Tomlinson stated he was concerned not working on Saturdays would push the project out quite a bit. Commissioner Flores stated the Reclamation plan was found to be in conformance with the County of Riverside as RP 112, prior to incorporating into a city. The applicant has requested separate approval of the plan from the City of Lake Elsinore and the Planning Commission. The Department of Conservation, Mine Reclamation has reviewed the Reclamation Plan and has fully addressed concerns. Commissioner Zanelli read conditions 26 and 27 relating to traffic control along the area of the project. Chairman O'Neal suggested putting in a warning sign or maybe a stop. sign on the curves of the Nichols Road overpass. Chairman O'Neal also recommended that staff work with the applicant to process an application with CALTRANS for traffic control within State right of way. Mr. Tomlinson stated activity will probably be started in less than 60 days. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-101, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.2006-6. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY GONZALES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION, NO. 2006-102, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 6 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-1 IS EXEMPT FROM THE MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY MENDOZA, AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-103, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECLAMATION PLAN N0.2006-1. 4. Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02 and Tentative Condominium Tract No. 34864 "Office Building Complex" 7:30:27 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing. Planning Manager Weiner stated that this project is a request for a Commercial Design Review and Tentative Condominium Tract Map for a new office building complex on Canyon Estates Drive. Planning Manager Weiner introduced Senior Planner Matt Harris, who presented the Staff report. Senior Planner Hams presented the staff report and stated that the project is a 2 story 14,500 square foot, Professional Office Condominium Building. It is being proposed along with a Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes. The vacant site is located on the south side of Canyon Estates Drive, west of Summerhill Drive. It is in the Canyon Creek Summerhill Specific Plan and zoned neighborhood commercial. There are three rows of parking proposed in front of the building, two main access points on the east and west sides of the parking lot and there are also two secondary access points where the existing driveways of Washington Mutual Bank exist. 17% of the site has been landscaped with an assortment of trees. There will be 14 different office suites within the building to be sold separately and also CC&R'S will be required. Parking spaces further away from the building will be designated for employees. Staff believes that all parking provisions have been met. Staff is requesting the number of spaces on site be considered appropriate. The CC&R'S will incorporate language indicating that employees are not allowed to park directly in front of the building. The project has been found exempt from Environmental provisions, given that it was already evaluated previously within the Specific Plan. .Lon Bike, with the architectural firm working on the project, Brett Keshtkaz, a representative from the owner partnership, Brett Keshtkar and civil engineer John Rogers were all present to address any concerns that the Planning Commission may have. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 7 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OCfOBER3, 2006 John Rodgers CLE Engineering of Murrieta, he stated he has not had an adequate amount of time to review the conditions, they were just received within the last few days. He apologized to Staff for not getting back to them with questions. He went on to state regarding the reciprocal parking with Washington Mutual Bank, the "and pazking" was mentioned in the fourth line, but it should also address "and pazking" in the fifth line, allowing the motoring public to travel on either property in order to access the other property. He stated there aze an additional couple of words .they would like to be removed from Condition No. 17. He also stated that some conditions were put in prior to issuance of grading and building permit, they have to do with traffic on Canyon Estates Drive, specifically Conditions No. 65, 66, and 68 they have to do with the revising signing and striping on Canyon Estates Drive for about one thousand feet from Summerhill to Ridgecrest Drive, re-constructing the driveway to the project across from Boulder Vista Drive with righf in, right out. He also stated the applicant would not object to sharing one ninth of the cost, but this project does not contribute to the majority of the traffic to the loop road in the Specific Plan. Mr. Rodgers would like to ask that these conditions be stricken from the approval. He stated he would accept an alternative Condition that would require the applicant to not oppose, and actively work with the city to support the cooperation of the other eight property owners. He stated he felt it was not appropriate to put these conditions on this one project. Finally he stated that under "Administrative Services" this project is being tasked with annexing to and contributing to a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District and to - a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. The other eight property owners are not being tasked with these conditions. He questioned why they are the only applicants being asked to contribute to this condition City Engineer Seumalo stated that Condition No. 65 is a requiring revision of the signing and striping. He also stated that he does not agree with removing the conditions of approval. He went on to state that he does agree with the applicant regarding the fair shaze cost, and he would be willing to investigate reimbursement agreement or a type of cost sharing. Chairman O'Neal suggested continuing this item to the next meeting. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY FLORES, FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THIS MATTER TO THE NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 17, 2006 _ Tim Fleming, resident of Lake Elsinore and on the General Plan Advisory Committee stated that this project was not presented to the committee. The Committee is concerned with traffic on Canyon Estates Drive. Agenda I[em No. Page of PAGE. 8 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 7:52:14 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing. 5. Commercial Design Review No. 2006-104 for constructions of a Clubhouse for the future Golf Course known as "The Links at Summerly". 7:52:56 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing and requested the reading of the staff report. Planning Consultant Miller presented the Staff report and stated that a request for approval of a Clubhouse that will be associated to the future Golf Course Complex, known as the "Links at Summerly." The project is located within the East Lakes Specific Plan, Amendment No. 6 also known as the Laing Home Project. The clubhouse will be 5,186 squaze feet and located on a 3.5 acre parcel. The building covers approximately 3% of the pazcel area. The building will include a pro-shop, kitchen, restaurant, offices and restrooms. The outdoor area will include an outdoor public area with a terrace restaurant, bazbeque and fire pit area, and seating wall. The building proposed is a Craftsman Style building. Staff feels the Craftsman Style Clubhouse will blend well with the proposed future residential products to be built within the development. Michael Filler, John Laing Homes, 331881 Corydon Avenue, Lake Elsinore, was present and thanked Staff for their work on this project. Chairman O'Neal stated the hard work put forth by Mr. Filler and Staff is obvious. 7:59:32 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing Commissioner Gonzales questioned when the Golf Course and Clubhouse would be completed. Mr. Filler stated he is anticipating construction to start in October 2006, with completion in July 2007 for the clubhouse and October 2007 for the Golf Course. Commissioner Mendoza commented that this Golf Course will be a tremendous asset to the City of Lake Elsinore. Commissioner Flores stated that he would like to see a correction inputting the boiler room next to the electrical as this could be an unsafe location. Commissioner Zanelli stated he would like to see a larger azea to maybe hold weddings or receptions. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY GONZALES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 9 -PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 NO. 2006-104, COMMISSION CALIFORNIA, REVIEW NO. MULTIPLE-SP (MSHCP) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, APPROVING COMMERCLAL DESIGN 2006-05 AS CONSISTENT WITH THE ECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. .2006-105, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05, FOR A CLUBHOUSE FOR A FUTURE GOLF COURSE FACILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAING, LAKE ELSINORE, LLC DEVELOPMENT. 6. Minor Desien Review of a Residential Dunlex located on Kellotff Street (APN 374-044-0071 8:06:55 PM Chairman O'Neal indicated that the next item was pulled from the Consent Calendar, and requested the reading of the staff report. Planning Manager Weiner introduced Project Planner Miller and indicated that she would present the Staff report and be available to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Project Planner Miller stated that this is an approval for a duplex building to be constructed on Kellogg Street. Each unit is 1,651 squaze feet with an attached 2-car garage of 590 square feet. The total building area is 3,218 square feet. Each garage has an 80 square foot storage azea. The duplex will be constructed using Craftsman Style architecture with wrap around covered porches. The applicant will landscape approximately 39% of the lot area. Staff determined the residential project complies with the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Historic Elsinore standards. Applicant, Kevin Duman of Rancho Santa Margarita, California, stated he agrees to all conditions. 8:10:19 PM Chairman O'Neal requested comments from the Commission. Commissioner Zanelli questioned the exact location of the elevation of the project. Commissioner Flores had no comment. Commissioner Mendoza had no comment. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 10 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINCTTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 Commissioner Gonzales questioned the space between each garage, with a concern of bird nesting. The applicant stated there will be a wall and roof overhang between the space. MOVED BY ZANELLI, SECONDED BY MENDOZA AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-106, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX PROJECT LOCATED ON KELLOGG STREET. 7. Industrial Design Review No I 2006-O1 8:14:00 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing, Associate Planner Carlson presented the proposed project as an industrial building located at 570 Third Street. Associate Planner Carlson indicated that the applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the development of a pre-cast concrete industrial building, available for lease on an approximate 1.1 acre parcel. The site has been previously graded. The primary access of the site. will be off of Third Street, with a main drive aisle about 25 feet in width. Associate Planner Carlson said Staff would like to notify the commission that the compact parking ordinance will go into effect in October. Staff has reviewed the project and has found that the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.56, Limited Industrial Sector Ml, Chapter 17.66, Parking Requirements, Chapter 17.82 Design Review, and Chapter 17.38 Non-Residential Development Standards. Additionally, Staff would like to read two items into the record. Staff recommends the Resolurions be modified. He stated that currently, the project is exempt under CEQA. Associate Planner Carlson indicated that the applicant notified Staff that he has decided not to install a security gate on the site plan. The applicant has asked staff to remove Condition No. 35 and 36, which talks about showing elevations to Community Development Director to see what the gate will look like off of Third Street. Staff agrees to remove conditions since there will be no gate and asks that a condition be added as follows: Prior to an issuance a Building Permit the applicant shall submit revised site plans showing a continuous split face block wall, extending west from the existing wall along the southern property line, ceasing approximately 82 feet back from the front property line. The design and materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. _ The Project Architect, Howard Parsell, 4854 Main Street, Yorba Linda, California, stated he has a problem with Condition No. 27, which states he must obtain a notarized letter from the adjacent property owner for maintenance of the wall on the property line. The design was not Agenda I[em No. Page of PAGE 11-PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 based on a 5 foot set back. The concrete wall can be maintained from the applicant's property. Project Planner Carlson stated that Staff had some concerns about the applicant being able to access the wall without encroaching on the neighbor property. Staff did notify the applicant of this condition approximately 3 weeks ago. Property owner, Byron Bishop 32931 Bryant Street, Wildomar, stated he is currently developing three projects in Lake Elsinore. He stated that two of the projects are on property lines. Mr. Bishop stated there would be a great deal of money lost if the property was decreased. Commissioner Zanelli stated he would have no problem with someone on his property to maintain or paint a wall on the property line. He suggested striking Condition No. 27. Commissioner Flores suggested striking Condition No. 27. Commissioner Mendoza questioned why the neighboring property owner had not been contacted to work something out. Mr. Bishop stated he has tried to contact the property owner but he is not on the property. He also stated this is the first time he has come across this problem. Commissioner Mendoza suggested striking Condition No. 27. 8:34:36 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing. MOVED $Y GONZALES, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-107, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROJECT KNOWN AS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-O1 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MSHCP. MOVED BY ZANELLI, SECONDED BY MENDOZA AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-108, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO 2006-O1 FOR AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH TWO STORY OFFICES AND THE STRIKING OF CONDITION N0.27. INFORMATIONAL None Agenda I[em No. Page of PAGE 12 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 STAFF COMMENTS City Engineer Seumalo commented on the followin¢: Regarding Railroad Canyon Road and I-15, they have started pouring the foundations for the retaining wall and the widening project is moving along. There have been a couple of delays in the project that was anticipated to be completed by October 18' 2006, and is now looking to be completed by mid December. Staff is working with the contractor to try and complete the project by November 18, 2006. Staff is still waiting for the encroachment permit from Cal-Trans regarding the signal and intersection widening at Ortega and Grand. Staff is taking forward. an agreement that was provided by Cal-Trans and Cal-Trans will be contributing $120,000 towards the project. The signal at Auto Center Drive was scheduled to be operational today, but this has not been confirmed. Planning Manager Weiner commented on the followin¢: Regarding the various sheets and memos received tonight with additional, deleted and modified conditions, Staff does Fed-Ex the Conditions of Approval to the Applicant once they are approved, we also offer to email them or they can be picked up so there is ample time for review. Attorney Santana commented on the following; Regarding the discussion on property lines, is the Commission comfortable with the current status of the Municipal Code which does permit the zero property line? Should we consider potential revision to the set back standard so this is not a problem in the future with a maintenance issue? PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Chairman O'Neal commented on the followine: • None Commissioner Zanelli commented on the followine: Agenda Item No Page of PAGE 13 -PLANNING COMNIISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 3, 2006 Commissioner indicated that there is still a delay regarding the lighting standazds on Lakeshore. City Engineer Seumalo indicated that Staff is struggling to get a full cast of the light standazd and we have a goal of having it lit by Christmas. We may have a more positive report to give in two weeks. • -The Central Avenue off ramp has two projects in the planning stages. An interim project was submitted to Cal-Trans last week for review. This would be an encroachment permit project. The other is a partial clover with a lobe on the Southwest comer of Central. • Commissioner Zanelli thanked staff for their hard work. Commissioner Flores commented on the followine: • None Commissioner Mendoza commented on the followine: • None Vice Chair Gonzales commented on the following When will the overpass on Riverside Drive and Dexter be done? City Engineer Seumalo stated that at this time there is no funding for that project. Across from Costco on the North side of Dexter, there has been a lot of erosion on the drainage structure, this must be filled with something more solid. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 14 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OC"I'OBER 3, 2006 THERE BEING NO FCIRTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT, 8:57:11 PM ON OCTOBER 3.2006. Respectfully Submitted, Arsi Baron ATTEST: Tom Weiner, Planning Manager Agenda Item No. Page of