Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-16-2006 NAHMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, MAY 16.2006 CALL TO ORDER: 6:05:16 PM Chairman O'Neal called the Regular Planning Commission Meeting to order. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Flores led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: O'NEAL, GONZALES, AND FLORES ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were: Community Development Director Preisendanz, Planning Manager Weiner, City Engineer Seumalo, Deputy City Attorney Santana, Senior Planner Harris, Associate Planner Carlson, and Office Specialist Porche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS INon-AEendized itemsl None CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman O'Neal requested to pull Item No. 3 and requested Community Development Director Preisendanz to discuss the project with the Commission. 3. Minor Desien Review of a 9.09 Acre Site Community Development Director Preisendanz stated the applicant Castle & Cooke has requested the Planning Commission to approve a building footprint and approve MSHCP consistency fora 9.09 acre site located in Alberhill Specific Plan. He stated that based on Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 some comments from RCA, Staff has requested that this project be continued in order to get more information for the Planning Commission. Chairman O'Neal requested a Motion. MOVED BY FLORES, SECONDED BY GONZALES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO CONTINUE MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A 9.09 ACRE SITE LOCATED IN THE ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN, APN: 390-130-017 TO THE JUNE 20, 2006 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. 1. Minutes a. Regulaz Planning Commission Minutes of May 2, 2006 Chairman O'Neal requested comments to the May 2, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes. There being no comments, Chairman O'Neal requested a Motion. MOVED BY FLORES, SECONDED BY GONZALES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. Commercial Design Review No. 2005-08 "Medical Office Buildine" 6:08:41 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing. Community Development Director Preisendanz introduced Senior Planner Harris and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Senior Planner Harris stated that this is a request for a Design Review of a two-story 10,000 square-foot medical office building within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. He indicated that the primary access point onsite shall be provided off of the private loop road which connects to Canyon Estates Drive. He stated that the architectural style of the building would be classified as Contemporary Mediterranean, which is consistent with the surrounding area. He stated that Staff has Agenda IIem No. Page of PAGE 3 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 worked with the Landscape Architect and proposed a unique tree palette to include Orange Citrus and Mexican Avocado trees around the perimeter of the building along with Queen Palms. Senior Planner Harris stated that Staff has determined that this project meets all the requirements of the LEMC and recommends to the Planning Commission to approve and recommend to the City Council; Commercial Design Review No. C 2005-08, based on the Findings, Exhibits "A" through "G" and the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is available for any questions. Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium. Mr. Lon Bike, 23905 Clinton Keith Road, Wildomar, CA stated that he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Chairman O'Neal requested any comments from the public. There being no comments from the public, Chairman O'Neal brought the discussion back to the dais. Commissioner Flores requested the time frame of construction. Mr. Bike stated that they would like to begin immediately and expects to be completed within one yeaz. Commissioner Flores asked what the maximum capacity of the parking is. Mr. Bike stated that they have 40 parking stalls which meets the City's Ordinance. Commissioner Flores asked the applicant how many offices would the building have. Mr. Bike stated said maybe 4 to 5 offices, however that has not yet been determined. Commissioner Flores had no further comments. Vice Chairman Gonzales asked Mr. Bike what type of practice would be preformed. Mr. Bike indicated that the Doctor is a General Practitioner. Vice Chairman Gonzales noted that the plans only shows two handicap pazking spaces and may need more later. Agenda IIem No. Page of PAGE 4 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 Mr. Bike stated that there are'4 handicap parking spaces and the project meets the ADA requirements. Vice Chairman Gonzales had no further comments. Chairman O'Neal indicated that he concurs with Staff s recommendation, and had no further comments. 6:19:09 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing and requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-50, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-08 FOR A TWO-STORY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING WITHIN THE CANYON CREEK "SUMMERHILL" SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT APN 363-670-005. 5. Tentative Parcel Map No. 33182 at 32920 Kevin Place" 6:20:06 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that this is a request for a Tentative Parcel Map and requested Planning Manager Weiner to read the Staff Report and answer any questions that the Commission may have. Planning Manager Weiner stated that the applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.23 acre parcel of land into four individual lots. He stated that the site is located on Kevin Place, north of Grand Avenue. He stated that the previous version of the map has been reconfigured to eliminate the remainder lot that was previously shown. He indicated that parcel one reflects the addition of an easement for access to an adjacent property's road-way. He stated that the continuation of land identified as lot 6, shows what area lies beyond this subdivision. Planning Manager Weiner stated that this is a recommendation of approval for the division of land only. He indicated that the development of the lots and subsequent design would return Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 5 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 back to the Planning Commission at a later date. He indicated that the applicant is available for comments. Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium Mr. Dean Wood, President of Custom Built Connection, Fullerton CA, indicated that he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Chairman O'Neal called apon Mark Vezzani to approach the podium. Mark Vezzani, Serena Shores Home-Owners Association, 32925 Kevin Place stated that he has a concern and stated that it appears that the remainder lot that Planning Manager Weiner indicated was not on the map shown tonight. He also indicated that he has concerns of the street size of Kevin Place. Chairman O'Neal requested Mr. Wood to address Mr. Vezzani's concerns. Mr. Wood stated that the remainder lot is the appraiser's lot. He stated that he would be using four lots and what is left over would remain with them. He stated that the original design was to have a remainder lot and just hold it pending another access out. He indicated that he would have to widen the street as part of the development. Chairman O'Neal requested Melissa Labayog. Melissa Labayog representing Serena Shore Homeowner Association, 32976 Serena Way, Lake Elsinore stated that she is here to make sure that this process addresses the remainder lot. She indicated that they currently have a remainder lot left over from a development four years ago, and indicated that it is a constant battle to keep it clear of weeds and trash. She also requested a map with cun•ent changes, as the map shown is not current. Chairman O'Neal requested Hugh Mosacher to approach the podium. Mr. Hugh Mosbacher, 600 Third Street, Lake Elsinore stated that he has a lot adjacent to the development. He indicated that there is a 50-foot easement coming into his property. He indicated that he spoke to Mr. Wood and made a suggestion that he would give him a 12-foot easement plus a 10-foot easement, which then brings that last lot up to the standard that he needs to build a house. Chairman O'Neal indicated that there are many issues that have not been resolved, and are not included in the Staff Report. He requested Community Development Director Preisendanz to address the issues. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that the map that is shown before the audience is not the revised map. He indicated that the map that is included in the Agenda Item No. _ Page of PAGE 6 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 Commissioners packet is the revised map. He stated that the other issue is the remainder lot. He indicated that the lot is not under the ownership of Mr. Woods, and would not be part of the map. He stated that as far as parcel number one (1) he stated that there would be an easement that would be maintained by the homeowner. Furthermore, he indicated that this is just a Parcel Map. He indicated that the Design Review would come back to the Commission. Chairman O'Neal asked if anyone else requested to speak either for or against this project. Corte Farmin, 32905 Kevin Place, Lake Elsinore requested that the landscaping be attended because of the surrounding areas within the community. He asked if the street widening provision would enable cars to be parked both side of the street. Mr. Wood stated that the street widening is in accordance with the City's regulations, which would be 60-feet wide with the sidewalks. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman O'Neal brought the discussion back to the Commission for comments. Vice Chairman Gonzales indicated that it is vague on what is going on. He asked if the homes that would be built, belong to a homeowner's association. Ms. Labayog stated (inaudible). Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that he could condition that the homes be annexed into the existing HOA. Vice Chairman Gonzales asked if the City knew what would be built on the four (4) parcels. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated "That would be determined". Vice Chairman Gonzales asked if there is a condition that discusses the easement. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that the easement shown on the map is on parcel one (1) and is to be maintained by the owner. Mr. Wood stated that the easement is already a recorded easement. He stated that what is important is that the easement is cleaned up. He stated that the road right now is dirt. He stated that he would pave the easement in exchange for some tradeoffs. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that "What you see is what you get". He stated that this map is four (4) parcels; it has an easement across parcel one (1) to be maintained by the property owner. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 7 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 Commissioner Flores asked if the map that was included in his packet was the same map in front of the audience. Planning Manager Weiner indicated that the map shown to the audience is an error. He indicated that it is the old map, and not the revised map. Commission Flores requested Mr. Woods to approach the podium. He asked if he would address the road easement and asked if the agreements that where made last night were placed in writing. Mr. Woods stated that the agreements made would require approval later on. Commissioner Flores asked Mr. Mosbacher stated that the problem with an easement is that you can't plant trees, you can't really landscape properly. He indicated that if a lot line adjustment was made down the center of the driveway, it would benefit all the parties. Commissioner Flores asked Ms. Labayog if she has any concerns with the vacant lot. Ms. Labayog stated that she has already several pieces of in and around the neighborhood that basically are not be maintained by the owners. She stated that if she had a chance to review the revised map, that she would have had a more positive view on this project. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that unfortunately it happened. Again he stated that this map (revised) is what it is. He indicated that what the Commission has in their packets is the accurate map and he feels comfortable with approving the map as it is. Chairman O'Neal addressed some of his concerns. He first commended the developer meeting with the owners and trying to address everyone's concerns. He concurred with Commissioner Flores on making sure that the public has the correct information. He stated that there is no such thing as the "remainder lot". He indicated that there is land that is not being used by this developer, but he still owns that property. He also indicated that it does cloud the issue slightly to talk about the easement without it being written down on paper and not reviewed by the Commission. He indicated that he would support Staff s recommendation however; the proper information should be up on the board the next time as well as given to the public ahead of time. Chairman O'Neal requested to hear from City Engineer Seumalo. City Engineer Seumalo recommended to the Commission to strike Condition No. 28 which references the remainder lot. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 8 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 Deputy City Attorney Santana stated that most of her comments have already been addressed but did want to point out the nature of the easement is not actually the equivalent of a fee simple interest. She stated that the easement is simply allowing ingress and egress, allowing somebody to pass over the property. She stated that the underlying fee simple interest still remains with the owner of pazcel one. She indicated to the extent that parcel one's owner is allowing people to access his property, the homeowner would still be required to maintain that property according to Health and Safety Code's regulations and LEMC. 6:52:44 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Heazing and requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-51, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATVIE PARCEL MAP N0.33182. 6. Residential Design Review for Four (4) Tri-Level Duplexes located on Graham Avenue, APN No. 373-040-006 thou¢h 373-040-009. 6:55:01 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Heazing and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated that this is request for a design review of four (4) detached tri-level duplexes off Graham, and requested Planning Manager Weiner to review with the Commission, and answer any questions that the Commission may have. Planning Manager Weiner indicated that this project is located on Graham Avenue south of Main Street within the Historical Downtown Zone District. He stated that the project meets all of the minimum guidelines set forth in the LEMC. He also noted that the project meets all of the parking guidelines. He stated that the applicant has chosen a Spanish Eclectic architectural style for the project and are consistent with those outline in the Historical Elsinore Guidelines. He indicated that the applicant is available for comments. Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 9 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 Kim Quan, Architect for the project, indicated that he has noticed a few discrepancies. He indicated that McElhinney who is the applicant has not received a copy of the Conditions of Approval. He also indicated that the Assessor's Parcel numbers aze not consistent and there maybe some address information that is not quite right. Chairman O'Neal requested a five (5) minute recess so that the applicant can review the Conditions of Approval. 6:57:50 PM Chairman O'Neal called for a five (5) minute break. 7:05:45 PM Chairman O'Neal reconvened the meeting. Chairman O'Neal asked Mr. Quan if he agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Quan stated "Yes". He stated that the APN aze not consistent and the Agenda also indicates that the address is on Graham Avenue and not Poe Street. Chairman O'Neal requested asked if anyone wished to speak for or against this project. There being none, Chairman O'Neal brought the discussion back to the dais. Vice Chairman Gonzales requested clarification of the Lot Line Adjustment. Mr. Quan stated that currently the property lines are not equally spaced through the properties. He indicated what they propose to do is to adjust the property lines so that you have equal distance along the curb of Graham Avenue and that is becomes in the neighborhood of 50 feet evenly divide though-out the four lots. Vice Chairman Gonzales had no further comments. Commissioner Flores had no comments or questions. O'Neal indicated that the design looks good, and had no further comments. 7:09:19 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing and requested a Motion. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-52, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR FOUR (4) RESIDENTIAL Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 10 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 DUPLEX UNITS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAHAM APN 373-046-006 THROUGH 373-046-009. BUSINESS ITEMS 7. General Plan Conformity Determination for Proaosed Street Vacation of Flint Street. Chairman O'Neal requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated that at the request from a property owner on an adjacent lot to street vacation a portion of Flint Street right-of--way. He requested City Engineer Seumalo to read the Staff Report, and answer any questions that the Commission may have. City Engineer Seumalo stated that the portion of Flint Street is between Lowell and Kellogg Street and the southerly portion has previously been vacated. He stated that all property in the area have access to public streets. Chairman O'Neal asked for comments from the Commission. There being no comments from the Commission, a Roll Call Vote was requested. Commissioner Flores: Aye Vice Chairman Gonzales: Aye Chairman O'Neal: Aye 8. General Plan Conformity Determination for Proposed Street Vacation of Old Railroad Canyon Road. Chairman O'Neal requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that this is a request to street vacation an old right-of--way along Railroad Canyon Road and request City Engineer Seumalo to review it with the Commission. City Engineer Seumalo indicated that this project consists solely of considering the proposed vacation of the old Railroad Canyon Road alignment. Chairman O'Neal asked for comments from the Commission. Agenda Item No. Page of PAGE 11 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 There being no comments from the Commission, a Roll Call Vote was requested. Commissioner Flores: Aye Vice Chairman Gonzales: Aye Chairman O'Neal: Aye INFORMATIONAL None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Pxeisendanz commented on the following • He requested the Platu~ing Commission's consideration regarding the canceling of the July 4~' 2006 regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. Chairman O'Neal agreed to cancel the meeting so that the City Staff and Planning Commission could enjoy time with their families. • He also apologized fox the confusion that was caused tonight and would make every effort to make presentations more clear. Cit~Engineer Seumalo commented on the following_ • He stated that he would like to propose to the Commission an update on Capital Improvement projects or changes through out the City by answering any questions that the Commission may and present items that have come up. He stated that the item for this week is EVMWD had awater-line blow out on Railroad Canyon Road and the City had to divert traffic. He stated that the detour is still in effect and EVMWD would pave on Wednesday or Thursday of this week. • He also stated that on Franklin and Auto Center Drive would be going under construction beginning on Thursday and would continue for approximately six (6) weeks. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Flores commented on the followine: • He requested Staff to have the correct maps shown for the audience and the correct information. Agenda Item No Page of PAGE 12 -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006 • He requested information regarding the meeting scheduled for May 17, 2006. Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated that the meeting is regarding the Public Scoping regarding the Annexation of an area off Highway 74. He indicated that all Planning Commissioners and City Council are invited to come, however it is not mandatory. • He asked Staff on what the time frame is for the applicants to review the Conditions of Approval. Planning Manager Weiner stated that the applicants are mailed via FED- EX at the time that the agenda packets aze delivered to the Commissioners. Vice Chairman Gonzales commented on the followine: • He stated that he recently visited Alaska for vacation and learned how they review new design review projects. He indicated their concept is unique and would be present to the Governor of Alaska to set that procedure for the entire state of Alaska. He noted that the Planner who designed this was a graduate of Temescal High School. Chairman O'Neal commented on the followine: • None ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL THE MEETING AT 7:25:19 PM ON MAY 16, 2001 / O'N Respectfully Submitted, ~~c~cu~ C ~%~~~' Dana C. Porche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development Agenda Item No. Page of