HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 1969-1270
31
32
~[SOLUT! 17
I~ :U:SOLUTI ,~:)F TH
F LL", I
E, C/\Ll
I.::,
g
F TH
FO~~~ULA [A~lENOED Tn
I NG TH ~~
J'::OHE
OJ ST,{! UTIC
1
p
CIG/\RETTE TAX,
2
3
. the Elsinore Ci
C, ;unci 1 1"ldS, c:}S fJ
r f t
Citru
1"
, fI'
. ~ II
4
,F Citl OJ> en r:'
:31ti"Hl t t
~i',!i 0r1 ~ tIle Cdl if0rni~ L(:.3
5
d>:.ati)n
arnendc t() prc'\'j
, .
...;(,:C[i<..)n __
f the Revenue a
6
l~ eqllitab-le distributi
f t
(.::.~." ci tt {.;;;;< -=~n ,
fCJ r a
7
ViHERE.L\S, the Elsir~orc' City r~_,'uncil has det rrni
that tJ.1(c,ir lect
8 representatives to the State Senat and State Assembly shaul be enCQura
9 '..' c;upp:rt the d'i:Jllge.
10
, TH[:-~<EFORE BE JT RESOl ,~.u t:"l~Jt t>le Elsin<_:rr" City C(:")unc~l r'2quc:st
11
5enat r Col gne and Assemblyman
Ie to support the change in Icgislati
12
rth in the attached res' lutj"n.
as set
13
th clay of ,}cllluar'y.!;l
i\DOFTED thi::-
14
M'C.. ,-;,;'
/~ _-r",/'1/r~;;--'/,6:"?";1:/f;..,,/
""..,. 'r' T F" ~., (/ 1,,/' ~
Mayo~ . .-.
if trY .J~) ..
I /,.t~i;;." >""",,_
;/;
///
15
16
17 ,(i.ttest:
18
19
/
",~.;,;t,'~'f: e",.c,'('/j'';?'J jC/?Ao.o"".,.,(;' _1',.:;::"
City Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
RESOLUTION OF THE CITRUS SELT DIVISION OF LEl\GUE
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REQUESTING THE ALLOCATION
FORMULA BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE A MORE EQUIT LE
DISTRIBUTION OF THE CIGA~ETTE TAX.
WHEREAS, Section 30462 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides
that the cigarette tax be al10cated in proportion that sales tax revenue
are transmitted to each county, ci and county and city of the state;
and
WHEREAS, such allocation formula fails to recognize certain
provisions of the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law,
wherein certain counties are, pursuant to agreement with cities
within each such county, allocated a percentage of the sales tax
earned within those cities; and
''ilHEREAS, this allocation fGnnula b~Jsed upon percentage of sales
taxes transmitted, has inadvertently failed to provide a uniform
allocation of the cigarette tax revenue; and
'I>JHEREAS, this allocation formula has provided counties with a
greater percentage of cigarette tax revenue that they would otherwise
be entitled; and
WHEREAS, this has penalized those cities that have agreed to
share their sales and use tax revenueS as provided by the BradJey-
Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved that the Citrus 3elt Division of
the League of California Cities recommend that the League of
California Cities sponsor legislation which will ~lmenc\ Section 30462
of the Revenue and Taxation Code to correct the inequities occurring
by use of the phrase lfsales tal' revenues transmitted."
BE IT FURTHER resolved that this phrase in subsections C(l) and
C(3) of Section 30462 of the Revenue and Taxation Code be amended to
read ilsales tax revenues derived frolll the 1% local Sales and Use Tax
levied. !