Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 1975-08RESOLUTION N0, 75-s„ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTEN~ TO CALL A SPECIAL 2~NNEXATION ELECTION, AS TO ANNEXATION N0, 21 - LINCOLN STREET~ AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PROTEST BY PROPERTY OWNERS, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore; 1. That it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore to call a special election to be held in certain inhabited territory contiguous to said City, proposed to be annexed thereto, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors residing in said teYritory the question o£ whether or not said territory should be annexed to the City of Lake Elsinore. Said territory is described as follows: Al1 that real property located in Che State of Califor- nia, County of Riverside, and more particularly described as follows: "That portion of Lots 20 and 21 of Block B, Rancho La Laguna, Section 2, Township 6 South, Range 5 West, County of Riverside, California, as shown on map in Book 8, Page 377, Records of the Recorder, County of San Diego, California, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Southwesterly line of Lincoln Street, 60 feet wide, with the Northwesterly line of Riverside Drive (also known as State Highway 74), 60 feet wide, as shown on said map of Rancho La Laguna, said point being also an angle point in the present boundary line of the City of Lake Elsinore; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line of Lincoln Street also being the present City Boundary of the City of Lake ElsinoYe and Northwesterly prolongation thereof a distance of 2655 feet, more or less, to a point of intersection with the centerline of Machado Street, 60 feet wide, as shown - 1 - on said map of Rancho La Laguna; thence Northeasterly along said centerline of Machado Street a distance of 940 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the pYesent City Boundary as described in Annexation No. 15, Ordinance No. 474 of the City of Elsinore, said point being 440 feet more or less Southwesterly, as measured along the centerline of Machado Street, from the intersection of the Northwesterly prolongation of the Northeasterly line of Lot 20 of said Rancho La Laguna with the centerline of Machado Street; then S 53° 03` E along said present City boundary 995 feet more or less to an angle point therein; thence N 36° 55' 30" E along said present City boundary 440 feet more or less to the intersection with the Northeasterly line of said Lot 20; thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly line of said Lot 20 and the present City boundary a distance of 340 feet, more oY less, to the NoYtherly corner of said Lot 21 of said Rancho La Laguna; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 21 also being the present City boundary, 462 feet to an angle point in the present City boundary; thence Southeasterly along a line parallel with the Northeasterly line of said Lot 21 also being the present City boundary a distance of 1320 feet, more or less, to a point of intersection with the Northwesterly line of said Riverside Drive, said point of intersection also being a point on the present City boundary; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of Riverside Drive and the present City boundary a distance of 918 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, Containing 60.14 acres, more or less," 2, That said territory hexeby is designated and identified as Annexation No, 21 - Lincoln Street, 3> Notice is heYeby given that on the loth day of Marca , 1975, at the hour of 7:30 p.m,, in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of the City of Lake Elsinore, any _ 2 _ pe~son owning real property within said territory so pYOposed to be annexed and having any objection to the proposed annexation may appear before said City Council and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Such protest must be in writing and shall state the name or names of the owner or owners of the property affected by such annexation and the location and area of such property in general teYms. If it be found that protest is not made by public and private owners equal to one-half of the value of the territory further pYOCeedings shall be taken in accoYdance with the law fo~ the holding of such special election. 5, ~hat the City Clerk sha11 certify to the adoption of this resolution and cause the same to be published in the Lake Elsinore Valley sun newspapeY once a week for the two weeks prior to the hearing. ADOPTED THIS lOth DAY OF Februarv ~ 1975~ by the following vote; AYES: Councilmen: DePasquale, Carter, Perkins & Mayor Pro Tem Cartier. NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Chaffin 7 ~~fP~~J ~a-a ~ .e .~~~Q City C er o t e City of La e E sinore 1975. Signed and approved this ioth day of February ~ ~_ . I' > Ma t e City o La e E sinore Pr Tem - 3 -