HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 1976-321
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1~
11
12
13'
14
1~
16
17
1$
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
`Z8
29
30
31
32
RE50LUTION No. 76-32
A RESOLUTION OP TSdE CITY OF LAILE ELSINC?~:.li, CI~LIFORb7IA, CONFIRCQING
AN ITEMI2,ED i~4RITTEN REPORT SI-IOCJING COST OI' L9EED AND RUBBISH
ABATEMENT, CONEIRMING 'PAE ITEMI?ED ?~RITTEN REPORT FOR EF~CF3 SEPARATE
PARCEL OF LAND RE!;?UI?tF.D BY SECTION 39574 OF TFIE GOVERNMENT CODE OF
THE ST11TE OF CALIL'OS2DIIA, F1NJ PROVIDING THAT THE COSTS THEREOP ON
EACH PARCEL OP LAND S?i~~LL CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST
THAT PROP~RTY AND SII?1LL 3E P~iZ~DE Z1 LI~N ON SAID P.'tRCF.LS OF L~LdD
Pi7RSUANT TO SECTIOT_d 39577 Or THP GOVERNP4ENT. CODE O: T?3E STAT~ OF
CALIPORNIA, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID BSSESSMENTS AS
PROVIDED IN SAID GOVE?2NMENT COD~.
i~~T:3EREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, Cali~ornia, by
Resolution Nos. 75--23, did undertake weed and rubbish abatement pursuant
to the Governr.ient Code of the State of California and Ordinance No. 532 of
the City, and did pursuant thereto cause to be held a public meeting before
said Council on September 27, 1°76, for the purpose of considering any and
all objections to said weed, rubbish, refuge,and dirt abatement, reference is
hereby made to said Resolutions.
WHEREAS, said public meeting was held at which time objections were con-
sidered by certain pronerty owners and said objections were overruled.
~iS?-IEREAS, the said City, pursuant to Section 39576.5 of the Government
Code of the State of California, did by contract award said work of abatement
to a contractor who was the lowest responsible bidder pursuant to said
Government Code.
P7HEREAS, thereafter said contractor did pursuant to said contract do
certain work in connection with the weecl, rubbish, refuge and dirt abatement
and did thereafter submit an account and an itemized written report f_or each
se.parate parcel of land required by Section 39574 of the Goverrvment Code of
the State oi California.
47HFREAS, thereafter there was mailed out a statement of charges ior
said ~veed abatement to the various pronerty o~aners upon which said
purported abatement work had been performed by the contractor.
SJHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, did
cause to be set a hearing at the City Iiall in the City of Lake rlsinore,
California, on the 3th day of November, 1976,at 7:30 P. M., for.the~purpose
of hearing any and all objec~tions to said report, by the nroPerty owners
liable to be assessed for the abatement. That.said notice of said hearing
was given to the respective property owners as grovided by law.
?QHEREAS, all objections f_iled at the hearing were overruled or with-
~,
drawn.
1
2
3
~
5
6
7
$
9
~~
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2$
29~
30
31 ~i
32 ~~
WHEREAS, at said meeting before the City Council of said City the City
Council did accept the report of the contractor, .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
1. That the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California ~
does hereby confirm the report made by the contractor together with the '
itemized written report and bill for each separate parcel of land required . ~
by section 39574 of the Government Code of the State of California. ~~ ~
2. That the cost of abatement.of said nuisance in front of or upon ~
each parcel of land shall constitute a special assessment against that parcel ~~~
and shall be a lien on said parcel of land in accordance with the provisions ~~
of the Government Code of the State of California and Ordinance No. 532 of ~
the City of Lake Elsinore, California.
3. That an itemized written report and bill for each separate parcel
of land is affixed to this Resolution and made a part thereof by reference
as though more fully set forth herein. That certified copies of this Resolut
together with the exhibit attached hereto, shall be delivered to the
Riverside County Auditor-Controller and shall be made a part of the tax ~~
assessment unless paid prior to filing, and be made a part of the tax rolls
including a recording fee of $15 per parcel, all in accordance with Sections '
39578,39579,39580 and 39583 of the Government Code of the State of California ~
and other provisions of law applicable thereto. Said report is being filed ~~
with the County Auditor for the reason that the County Assessor and Tax ~ ~
Collector of said Rive.rside.County perform the function of assessing property
and collecting the taxes of said City. ~.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 1976, by the ~
following vote: ~
AYES:
NOES:
Absent:
Frank L. DePasquale, Mayor ~
ATTEST:
Florene Marshall, City Clerk