Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-10-1982 City Council Minutes,G`k, I' CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Unsworth. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Councilmember Valenzuela. ROLL CALL The City Clerk called the roll: PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH �.. ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Rede, City Attorney Porter, City Clerk Harrington, Planning Director Morrissey, Interim Public Works Director /City Engineer Stevens, Building Director Frazier, Adminis- trative Assistants Steel and Foster. PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Unsworth read a proclamation proclaiming August 29th, 1982, as United States Paratroopers Day in the City of Lake Elsinore. CONSENT`CALENDAR w The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar for further consideration: Item 3. _ 1. Minutes - July 27, 1982 - Continued to the next meeting. 2. Warrant List - Month of July, 1982, check numbers 16612 through 16790 in the amount of $472,757.46. 3. Bond Release, Leach Canyon Channel Construction, Tract 13799. This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. 4. Animal Control Activity Report - -July. Accepted as an informational item. 5. Fire Safety /Housing Inspector Monthly Report - July. Accepted as an informational item. 6. Set for Public Hearing - September 14, 1982: A. Conditional Use Permit - 82 -7. B. Zone Change 82 -5. MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY TORN AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR. AYES: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Bond Release, Leach Canyon Channel Construction, Tract #13799. Councilman Torn stated he would have to abstain from voting on this item because he has been involved in the project. MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY MACMURRAY AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE BOND RELEASE FOR LEACH CANYON CHANNEL. wrl Page two City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued 3. Bond Release, Leach Canyon Road Channel Construction, Tract #13799. Roll Callon AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: OFF AGENDA ITEMS 1. Validation Si Motion: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NONE NONE TORN ait for the Redevelopment Agency Mr. Porter handed out a copy of the Court Summons which has caused some concerns in the community. The Summons is a require- ment of the state which tells people that some type of legal action is about to take place,and that they have a certain amount of time in which to respond to the action proposed., On this type of a suit, no one in particular is being sued. The suit does not seek to attach anyone's wages, savings or property. The Validation Suit is a necessary step for the Redevelopment Agency to establish the legal basis to issue bonds to collect tax increments. By filing this type of legal action the Redevelop- ment Agency is inviting anyone who may feel there is some type of procedural error in establishing the Agency or some type of violation of laws in establishing the Agency to speak regarding the agency in court. If no one speaks to the Court, then the Court finds a default judgement finding that the Agency is valid or has been established properly -and it has the authority to issue bonds and receive tax increment money. This action is necessary to ensure the potential bond holders that this matter will not be challenged later. ...r Eugene Carter read an open letter to the residents of the City of Lake Elsinore regarding the validation suit,stating he does not feel the Redevelopment Agency has the authority to issue bonds. Dan Strong, stated he would like to see the city put in a letter to the newspaper explaining items such as they when they arise. Council concurred to have staff write an article to the newspaper explaining this validation suit to the community. 2. Street Light Standards Mr. Rede gave background information on the bid process of the street light standards. Mr. Rede read a portion of the minutes from March 231, 1982 City Council Meeting pertaining to the sale of the light standards to Mr. & Mrs. Barnes. Wayne Clement, property owner in the Country Club Heights area, protested the sale of the light standards because of the historical value to the community and whether or not the city actually had the right to sell the light standards. Mr. Rede explained that the City did have the right to sell the light standards located in the city's right -of -way. Mr. Rede """ recommended that the City place a 7 day moratorium on the removal of the light standards to clarify some legal questions regarding their removal. Council concurred with staff recommendation. L`t%J Page three City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 PUBLIC COMMENTS Eugene Carter spoke regarding the Regional Sewer Plan which has been adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore several years ago. Mr. Carter asked the Council to review the plans to see if they have any merit. Mr. Carter felt Councilmembers should not be criticizing other communities which come to Lake Elsinore for recreation purposes. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Tentative Tract Map #18195 Mr. Unsworth announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on a Tentative Tract Map #18195 for a residential subdivision of 6.2 acres into 38 single - family lots. The property is located 1,200 feet east of Terra Cotta Road on Lakeshore Drive. Mr. Morrissey gave background information on the Tract Map with the Planning Commission recommending approval subject to 32 conditions, which includes a t finding of no significant impact upon the environment and issuance of a negative declaration. No correspondence had been received on the subject tract map. Mayor Unsworth opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. asking if anyone would like to speak in favor of the project. James Kencanon, architect for the applicant, had a question on the 25 -foot lot line frontages; the zero lot lines were approved by the Planning Com- mission on the cul -de -sacs. If the zero lot lines are not approved by the City Council, then the lots would have to be adjusted. Mayor Unsworth asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the tract map. No one asked to speak. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:12 p.m. Council questioned when has the city approved 15 -foot lot frontages. Mr. Morrissey reported that depending on the size of the radius curb for a cul -de -sac, subdivisions are allowed to have down to 15 -foot frontage. Mr. Torn asked that the Council make sure we condition the outside of the block wall to be well landscaped and drip irrigated as well as the individual lots. Mr. Torn felt there may be a problem with the formation of the street maintenance districts, if we approve the map he would like to see a condition inserted, ie, that a bond be required for the seal coating purposes before the city accepts the street for public maintenance. Mr. Torn also felt concerns regarding the parking situation on the cul -de -sacs. Discussion ensued regarding the zero lot line concept and how it relates to this tract map. Mr. Morrissey explained the zero lot line concept. Mr. Wood stated this concept is like putting a duplex in the middle of two lots. Discussion ensued regarding fire safety and the closeness of some of the proposed structures. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #18195 WITH THE EXISTING 32 CONDITIONS PLUS CONDITION #33 - THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL BOND FOR STREET SEAL COAT BEFORE ACCEPTANCE OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY: CONDITION #34 - THAT A PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION WILL BE DEVELOPED IF THE ZERO LOT LINE CONCEPT IS APPROVED AND CONDITION #35 - THAT A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET OF FRONTAGE BE PROVIDED TO EACH AND EVERY LOT. C'�i Page four City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 32. Zone Change 82 -2 - (Butterfield Surveys) Mr. Morrissey gave background information based on a report to the City Council dated July 22, 1982, recommending approval of the zone change subject to six (6) conditions, including a finding of no significanceupon the environment, issuance of a negative declaration, and a finding the proposed zone change will not inhibit the locality from providing required or necessary housing within the community. Mayor Unsworth opened the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. asking those in favor of the project to speak. Fred Crowe, Butterfield Surveys, 620 W. Graham Avenue, stated Mr. Palmer is in agreement with the conditions, however Mr. Palmer did request the Council look at the parcel which will be split by the zone change. Mr. Porter reported that the City Council can not take any action on the parcel not included in the proposed zone change 82 -2. Mr. Crowe asked that the original zone change be approved. Mayor Unsworth asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the zone change. No one asked to speak. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:36 p.m. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 82 -2, WITH THE ADDITION OF A SEVENTH CONDITION WHICH WOULD BE THE DEDICATION OF THE WATER RIGHTS ON THE PROPERTY AND THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO FAST -TRACT THE ZONE CHANGE ON PARCEL 10. 33. Zone Change 82 -3 - (Gateway Annexation) Mayor Unsworth announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on Zone Change 82 -3 - Gateway Annexation, located at the northeast of the intersection of I -15 and Highway 74. Mr. Morrissey gave background information on the Zone Change 82 -3 (Gateway Annexation) recommending conceptual approval subject to completion and certification of Environmental Impact Report and acceptance of the Planning Commission's report establishing the appropriateness of the annexation and zone change procedures. Mr. Morrissey reported that there has been correspondence received on the annexation but not on the zone change. Mayor Unsworth opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. asking if anyone would like to speak in favor of the project. No one asked to speak. Mayor Unsworth asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the zone change. low Everett Wood, 29421 Third Street, Lake Elsinore, stated he was. I opposed to the annexation but was in favor of the zone change. Mr. Wood asked if the City Council rezones the area the same as the County, how long will it remain that same zoning. Mr. Porter reported that the City Council can change the zoning on property by following procedures. This City Council or any City Council can not bind itself to never change the zoning. When a zone change occurs, the city must notify the people being affected, public notices given and public input received. William Holland, 1880 Cambren Drive, is in favor of the zoning to remain as is and asked that he be notified of meetings of the Planning Commission and City Council in the future. 'k I Page five City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 33. Zone Change 82 -3 - (Gateway Annexation) Leone Miller 29610 First Street, stated she would like the zoning to remain as is. Mr. Rede explained that most of the zone changes are at the request of property owners. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:56 p.m. Mr. Torn felt that there may be some potential zone changes in the area in order to meet with what the city feels are better development latitudes in the area. The City is looking at the commercial potential of the intersection.next to other commercial property located in the city, however does not intend to rezone any property where people are living. Any changes would benefit the Cl� people in the area. T� Ll- MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO GRANT CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 82 -3, SUBJECT TO Q COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT; AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE ANNEXATION AND ZONE CHANGE PROCEDURES. 34. Conditional Use Permit 82 -5 (Alexander Wood) Mr. Unsworth announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit #82 -5: Alexander Wood -- Recreational Vehicle Park, 32500 Riverside Drive. Mr. Morrissey gave background information on the Conditional Use Permit for Alexander Wood with the Planning Commission ,L recommending approval subject to 19 conditions which include a finding of no significant impact upon the environment and issuance of a negative declaration. Mayor Unsworth opened the public hearing at 9:06 p.m. asking if anyone would like to speak in favor of the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Al Wood, 31173 Kansas, Lake Elsinore, submitted a rendering of the proposed park showing changes in the park since the last City Council Meeting. Mr. Wood asked the Council for approval of the Use Permit. The Public Hearing was closed at 9:12 p.m. Mr. Torn suggested an additional condition that the applicant be required to install a low decorative wall similar in design to the wall begun by Butterfield'Mobile Home Park. This wall should not take away from the viewing of the lake, but have some consistency as you drive down Riverside Drive. Mr. Unsworth felt that the Council has allowed the Manager and the Owner to have children enrolled in local school, when they were located on the site. Mr. Unsworth would like condition #14 amended to allow this. Any boatlaunching need to be approved by the State Park and Recreation Department. Mr. Torn expressed concerns that behind the curbs where plants ar Wood. He would like to see some established to ensure this. Ms. trees would remain on the site. remain. the landscaping of the area e shown be maintained by Mr. type of irrigation system Valenzuela asked if the Pecan Mr. Wood assured her they would MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -5, DELETING ITEMS TWO AND THREE, ADDING CONDITION #22 - THAT A BLOCK WALL SIMILAR TO THE ONE AT BUTTERFIFLD MOBILE HOME PARK BE INSTALLED; AND CONDITION MG Page six City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 34. Conditional Use Permit 82 -5 (Alexander Wood) - Continued. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -5, DELETING ITEMS TWO AND THREE, ADDING CONDITION #22 - THAT AN AGREEMENT FOR A BLOCK WALL BE ENTERED INTO FOR A BLOCK WALL AT SUCH TIME THE RIGHT - OF -WAY IS DETERMINED ON RIVERSIDE DRIVE; CONDITION #23 - THAT A LIGHTING '.AND LANDSCAPING DISTRICT BE SUPERIMPOSED ON THE PROJECT; CONDITION #24 - THAT'ALL BOATLAUNCHING FACILITY PERMITS BE OBTAINED FROM THE STATE AND THAT CONDITION #14 BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THAT THERE BE EXCEPTION EXTENDED FOR THE CARETAKERS AND THE OWNER'S MOBILE HOMES ON THE SITE. Discussion ensued regarding how school mitigation fees should be handled with the owners and the school district. The majority of the council felt that the school fees should be worked out between the owners and the school district. The owner should be notified that there is a potential cost if any children live on the site. COUNCIL RECESSED AT 9:28 P.M. COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:38 P.M. 35. Conditional Use Permit 82 -6 (Donald A. Cook) Mayor Unsworth announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on Conditional Use Permit 82 -6: which is a request to establish a portable office trailer to see Ultralight equipment. The property is located Northwest of the intersection of Lucerne and Sylvester. Mr. Morrissey gave background information on the request for a .r Conditional Use Permit recommended denial without prejudice and that this item be reagendized for public hearing subsequent to having a City Council /Planning Commission joint study session. Mayor Unsworth opened the public hearing at 9:44 p.m. asking if anyone would like to speak in favor of the project. Donald Cook, 16054 Grand Avenue, applicant for the project, stated he did get approval from the Planning Commission with conditions, and did not feel it was the Planning Commission's intent to continue this item until after September 14th. Ed Stenwell, Canyon Lake Hills,-feels this business would be an asset to the community. Susan Zinda, Poppy Place, stated she felt Mr. Cook's business would be an asset to Lake Elsinore. Cindy Townsen, 16056 Grand Avenue spoke in favor of the conditional use permit. Mayor Unsworth asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition to the Conditional Use Permit. No one asked to speak. I i MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY TORN, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO CONTINUE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #82 -6 WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND REAGENDIZE FOR PUBLIC HEARING SUBSEQUENT TO HAVING A CITY "" COUNCIL /PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AT THE SEPTEMBER 14TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Mr. Cook stated that all he is asking for is a 20'x 10' trailer with a desk. Mr. Cook stated he felt his project was approved by the Planning Commission and that was all he needed. As a result he has leased a trailer. The City Council felt concerned that the Planning Commission tells applicants that their project has been approved, without telling them the final approval comes from the City Council. .J 4 zi Page seven City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 BUSINESS ITEMS 51. Commercial #82 -3 - Norman Industries Mr. Morrissey gave background information on Commercial 82 -3, recommending approval subject to 22 Planning Commission and 10 Design Review Board conditions of approval. Fred Crowe, Butterfield Surveys, representing the applicant, stated he would like to speak to the items listed in the staff recommendation and the paving of the parking lot. Mr. Crowe stated Mr. Brody would like to defer as many of the upfront expenses as possible under the request for the waiver Capital Improvement Program fees especially for the area under the 1265' which has been excluded in some instances from the fee schedules. Mr. Crowe suggested tha-t the fees for the U_J front area of the property be collected at the time the frontage 30 is improved. For the same reasons, he would like to defer the sidewalk improvements. Mr. Brody would like to develop -� the street portion for the drive -in public and defer the sidewalks until the front portion is developed. c� Mr. Crowe stated the plot plan proposes parking behind the new proposed building and shelter from the public. Mr. Brody would like to be exempt from paving for the back parking area which will be used for employees only. There are 10 spaces in front of the building for visitors. Mr. Torn feels that properties within the lake perimeter road having commercial potential and in some cases industrial potential, the best place for the parking is within the flood plain. If the use is actually an agricultural type use then we allow the parking lot in the flood plain. Mr. Torn has a concern about the parking not being done immediately because if the property is sold and there is a change in use, then there would be more of a demand for parking. Mr. Torn suggested that some type of an agreement be entered into along with a Deed Notification. Mr. Morrissey reported that this would be taken care of through the business license process. An ordinance allows for a bond or an agreement be placed against the property for the improvements of the sidewalks and streets. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY THAT A FINDING THAT PARKING IS AN ACCEPTABLE USE BECAUSE OF ITS AGRICULTURAL USE BELOW THE 1265' AND THAT AN AGREEMENT FOR . PARKING BE ENTERED INTO WITH THE APPLICANT AND THAT APPROPRIATE DUST CONTROL MEASURES BE INSTITUTED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT; THAT WE COLLECT ONLY THOSE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEES THAT ACTUALLY ARE RELEVANT TO THE PROJECT WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED; THAT WE EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON THE SIDEWALK WHICH WILL NOT BE INSTALLED NOW BUT THAT THE DRIVING WAY TO BE FULLY DEVELOPED AT THIS TIME,AND THE AGREEMENT BE ENTERED INTO FOR THE SIDEWALK TO BE INSTALLED AT A LATER DATE; AND CONDITION 16 BE AMENDED TO REI=LECT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR. Discussion was held on the type of trees to be located on the property with the representative of the applicant stating they had no objections to the type of trees. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY TORN, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY THAT THE ENTRANCE TO THE PROPERTY BE TREATED WITH THE SAME DUST CONTROL MEASURES AS THE PARKING AREA AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING AND AN AGREEMENT BE ENTERED INTO FOR SUBSEQUENT PAVING. Z 5 0 Page eight City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 52. Request for Business License - Antique Store Mr. Rede recommended approval of the Antique Business License with the stipu- lation that merchandise offered for sale be housed unless being transported. MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY MAC MURRAY AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO GRANT APPROVAL OF THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR AN ANTIQUE STORE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT ALL THE MERCHANDISE OFFERED FOR SALE BE HOUSED UNLESS BEING TRANSPORTED. 53. Citizen Request - Helen Shafer Dwayne Frazier gave background information on the request for waiver of building permit fees, school fees and installation of off -site improvements in conjunction with the rebuilding of Ms. Shafer's home which was damaged by a fire. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST THROUGH THE BUILDING DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION WITH ITEM #2 BEING AN AGREEMENT TO BE SIGNED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF OFF- SITES. 54. Citizen Request - Mr. & Mrs. Heliodoro Solis Mr. Frazier gave background information on the request for issuance of a permit to upgrade substandard electrical and minor repair for rehabilitation purposes to 31095 Kansas Street. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY MAC MURRAY AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ISSUE PERMIT FOR UP- GRADING OF SUBSTANDARD ELECTRICAL AND MINOR REPAIR FOR REHABILITATION. 55. Adoption of County Ordinances for Gateway Annexation Area. Mr. Morrissey gave background information recommending the Council adopt the controlling ordinances which restrict the placement of five (5) existing County ordinances to the Gateway Annexation Area. Mr. Porter reported that the Council can hold off on the second reading of the ordinance until such time a Resolution can be adopted to allow ordinances to be posted and summaries published. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY MAC MURRAY AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO READ ALL THE ORDINANCES BY TITLE ONLY. ORDINANCE NO. 642 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CERTAIN ZONING STANDARDS FOR USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 642. AYES: TORN, VALENZUELA, MAC MURRAY, KNIGHT, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE t V Page nine City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 55. Adoption of County Ordinances for Gateway Annexation Area ORDINANCE NO. 643 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.13 (A -1) LIGHT AGRICULTURE DISTRICT, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR A LIGHT AGRICULTURE DISTRICT (A -1) ZONE FOR USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 643. AYES: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 644 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.15 (R -R) RURAL- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR RURAL - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R -R) ZONE FOR USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 644. AYES: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ORDINANCE TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.17, (R -R -O) RURAL RESIDENTIAL, OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISTRICT, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR A RURAL RESIDENTIAL, OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISTRICT (R -R -O) ZONE FOR -USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING. AYES: NONE NOES: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH ABSENT: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 645 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.18, (R -1 -G) ONE- FAMILY DWELLINGS DISTRICT, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR A ONE- FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (R -1 -G) ZONE FOR USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 645. AYES: KNIGHT, MACMURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ;6 a L ,G a z Page ten City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 BUSINESS ITEMS,-. Continued. 55. Adoption of County Ordinance for Gateway Annexation Area - Continued. ORDINANCE NO. 646 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.51, (C -P -S) SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR A SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C -P -S) ZONE FOR USE ONLY WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY MAC MURRAY, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 646. AYES: KNIGHT, MAC MURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 647 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING THE SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1975. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 647. AYES: KNIGHT, MAC MURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 648 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING AND CONTROLLING THE LOCATION AND OPERATION OF HOG RANCHES AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SUCH BUSINESSES WITHIN THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION AREA, AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY MAC MURRAY AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 648. AYES: KNIGHT, MAC MURRAY, TORN, VALENZUELA, UNSWORTH NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT A FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT UPON THE ENVIRONMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Council concurred that the ordinance regarding the billboards was not approved because it was not the same as the County Ordinance. The Council has told the people in the annexation area that the ordinance would remain the same. L J aj Page eleven City Council Minutes August 10, 1982 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued 56. Street Lights in Tract #11939 John Stevens gave background information on the street lights located in Tract #11939 which was not developed. Mr. Torn felt that not all the lights in the tract need to be energized, as they do not provide any benefit to the city or the community. Council concurred to continue this item until the City Attorney can bring back some information on staff de- energizing the lights. 57. Animal Control Ordinance - Second Reading MOVED BY VALENZUELA, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO READ BY TITLE ONLY. ORDINANCE NO. 641 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,REPEALING ORDINANCES 396, 489, 537, 580 AND 589 AND LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.04 AND PROVIDING FOR LICENSING OF DOGS AND IMPOUNDING OF ANIMALS: REGULATING THE KEEPING AND CONTROL OF DOGS AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS: PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL AND SUPPRESSION OF RABIES: CONCERNING THE DUTIES OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE SECOND READING. Ms. Valenzuela suggested that an area be included in the ordinance relative to the keeping of gud'fd dogs on private property. Mr. Porter stated he would need to include a defi;ni.tion of Guard Dog and suggested placing an ordinance on a future agenda amending the above ordinance. 58. Animal Control Resolution - Setting Fees MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA, AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. RESOLUTION NO. 82- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA SETTING FEES FOR ANIMAL CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.04. Council adjourned to the Redevelopment Agency at 11:35 p.m. Council reconvened at 12:45 p.m. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Discussion was led on the General Plan and the Board of Realtors interest in providing some type of input on the Plan. The City Manager and Planning Director will work with the Board of Realtors in receiving their input. Discussion was held on the public safety fees, which will be placed on a future City Council Agenda. z a q Page twelve City Council Minutes August 10, 1983 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Continued. Mr. Torn reported the Board of Realtors asked for a continuance on the General Plan so that the City Manager can address the people and receive their input. Mr. Knight asked what the status was on the crossing at Heald Street and Pottery and if any action will be taken. Mr. Rede reported they are on a priority list and the Public Works Department is aware of the situation and will report back. Mr. Rede addressed the removal of the tracks on Graham Street stating we have the authority to proceed with the removal if we desire to do so at our own "M, expense. Mr. Rede felt it would be more feasible to remove all the tracks at once. Mr. Briggs asked if any oil could be put on Campus Way. Mr. Stevens reported the City does not have the equipment to put oil down on the streets. Council was concerned about the trash being dumped on' Frontier Street. Mr. Rede stated he will coordinate with the Highway Patrol and the Sheriff to have some type of enforcement in the area. Mr. Unsworth recommended the City post "No Littering" signs along the road with enforcement to come from the City Code Enforcement Officer and County Sheriff. Mr. Rede reported on the Spring Street Dedication stating that he has been in contact with Mr. Barenfeld and an appraiser on the property. An Appraiser has estimated the property to be approximately $150,000, because a portion of the property is in the flood plain. Council concurred to authorize staff to proceed to the limit of the law. Mr. Rede reported that he will be on vacation from September 15th through September 22, 1982. MOVED BY TORN, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE CITY MANAGER'S VACATION. �► Mr. Unsworth stated there is a new type of aircraft used for skydiving which is very annoying to a large number of the residents and the last flight of the day is at 7:15 p.m. Mr. Porter stated he is looking into an ordinance which is related to this. Mr. Porter will report back. Mr. Unsworth also reported that the ultralights are now starting to fly at night. Mr. Rede stated he has referred the complaints to the F.A.A. COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION FOR PURPOSES OF LITIGATION AT 1:09 A.M. COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 1:24 A.M. WITH NO ACTION TAKEN. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MAC MURRAY, SECONDED BY VALENZUELA AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADJOURN AT 1:25 A.M. ATTEST: :1.1 �� J HN G. UNSWORTH, MAYOR C TY OF LAKE ELSINORE