Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/15/2008 PC ReportsCITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MICHAEL O'NEAL, CHAIRMAN JOHN GONZALES, VICE CHAIRMAN JIMMY FLORES, COMMISSIONER AXEL ZANELLI, COMMISSIONER PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER W WW.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674 -3124 PHONE (951) 674 -2392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET ROLFE PREISENDANZ, DIR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2008 6:00 P.M. The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 1st and 3`d Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Friday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674 -3124, ext.289, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 1 yWlllln"111 a — 11VIY /1 V-y VILCU I I CIVI, -.3 IVIIIVU I C, (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, priorto the start of the Planning Commission Meeting) , e 21 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- APRIL 15, 2008 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Commissioner or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your item is called). General Plan Update Rolfe Preisendanz. Director of Community Development Ext. 223 rpreisendanz (a2lake- elsinore.org BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Planning Commission will adjourn to a special meeting, if necessary, on Tuesday, April 29, 2008, at 6:00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, Secretaryto the Planning Commission, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance if this meeting. Inyl -a ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LAKE LSIIYOKE DREAM EXTREME. TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 15, 2008 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE The project site includes the City of Lake Elsinore's incorporated City limit, the City's Sphere of Influence and the City's Planning Areas. BACKGROUND Pursuant to State Law (Government Code Section(s) 65300 et seq.) each city and county in California must prepare a comprehensive, long -term General Plan to guide its future. The General Plan is considered a city's constitution for future development. The general and specific goals and policies of the General Plan serve as the basis for the City's land use decisions and should provide both the interested public and the decision - makers a practical and implementable policy vision for the future. This General Plan Update includes the following: the General Plan, the District Plan, the Environmental Impact Report and Appendices and the General Plan Map, which is being presented in three (3) alternatives (the Preferred Alternative, Alternative 1 and Alternative 2). Text relative to Goals and Policies associated with each General Plan Element and illustrations mapping the generalized locations of future land uses are also being proposed therein. At the outset of the project, a General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) was formed, comprised of local residents, business owners and developers who provided needed citizen input for the plan formation. The GPAC met a total of fourteen (14) times between pl.wr -L._ Los PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE March 2005 and October 2006 and also participated in the public workshops and Joint City Council /Planning Commission /GPAC study sessions. Their input was critical to the successful adoption of this plan. The GPAC meetings were open to the public and a number of residents regularly participated. A community -wide visioning session was held at the Lake Elsinore Diamond Stadium in June 2005 to explain the General Plan process to participants and to gather input as to what the citizens of Lake Elsinore would like to see their city be in the next 25 years. This communitywide session was followed -up by three (3) neighborhood workshops held in different parts of the City, designed to make it convenient for residents to attend and participate. The result of the citizen input process is a General Plan that reflects the vision of those with the most at stake — the residents who live, work and play in the City of Lake Elsinore. PROJECT DESCRIPTION State Law (Government Code Section 65302) mandates that seven (7) elements be addressed in the General Plan. The seven (7) elements, that have been included, are: land use, circulation, housing, open space, conservation, noise and safety. Although distinct in nature, since these elements are not required to be presented in individual chapters as allowed (Government Code 65301), this proposed General Plan combines them into a smaller number of integrated chapters. The chapters of this General Plan er 2) Community Form; (Chapter 3) Public Safety include; (Chapter 1) Introduction; (Chapt and Welfare; (Chapter 4) Resource Protection and Preservation and (Chapter 5) Administration and Implementation. Chapter 1 (Introduction) Chapter 1 (Introduction), of this proposed General Plan, provides narrative relative to the Setting and Vision, Historic Overview, Demographic Overview, Dream Extreme: A Vision for the Future, Purpose and Nature of a General Plan, Overall Planning Approach, Citizen Input, Organization of the General Plan and Relationship to Other Plans and Ordinances. Chapter 2 (Community Form Chapter 2 (Community Form), will focus on the City's neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas, mixed use corridors, public spaces, parks and recreation, community facilities and services, urban design, historic preservation and mining. Ultimately the purpose of this chapter is to establish a clear course of direction for the City to make future land use decisions. As such, Chapter 2 will address the Land Use Element, the Circulation Element and the Housing Element. Chapter 3 (Public Safety and Welfare Chapter 3 (Public Safety and Welfare), addresses public safety and welfare issues including: air quality, fire and police, community facilities and services, hazards, and noise. AGENDA ITEM 110._L__ PAGE Z _G _A Q. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE The focus and concentration of Chapter 3 is on the maintaining a healthy and safe physical environment and ensuring community welfare through effective and efficient quality public service. Ultimately, Chapter 3 will address the Public Safety and Noise Elements. Chapter 4 (Resource Protection and Preservation) Considering the importance of the natural resources and open space within the City and its Sphere of Influence, Chapter 4 concentrates on addressing resource protection and preservation issues related to biological resources, open space, water resources, cultural and paleontological resources and aesthetic resources. Ultimately Chapter 4 embraces the Conservation and Open Space Elements. Chapter 5 (Administration and Implementation Finally, Chapter 5 entitled "Administration and Implementation" has been included in this General Plan in order to provide an implementation program for each goal within the updated General Plan. Finally, it is important to note that the previous General Plan was largely based on future Specific Planning areas. Approximately sixty -seven percent (67 %) of the City was designated as either future or approved Specific Plans within the 1990 General Plan. This approach was motivated by the desire to encourage creative land planning. Although, this General Plan continues to recognize adopted Specific Plan land uses, it eliminates all future Specific Plans in order to provide more specific land use direction. As such, neighborhoods were identified in the City and contained in a series of District Plans (See City of Lake Elsinore District Plan). The Districts recognized distinct neighborhoods within the City which had common characteristics, design guidelines, and geographical similarities. Also recognized in the city were certain Overlay /Special Treatment Areas. DISCUSSION Staff has determined that certain issues relative to the General Plan Update were raised during the Public Review Period of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, and can be summarized into three main topics: • The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). • The Housing Element • Land Use Requests These three main topics are explained below. The specific comments and detailed associated responses specificto the DEIR are provided in the Final Environmental Impact Report (Attachment 3). AGENDA ITE a9 NO. l B4PrE OF- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) The comments received on the DEIR and General Plan Update (GPU) relative to the MSHCP can be categorized into three (3) major issue areas. These issue areas included: modification of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) as part of the General Plan Update process; modification to the existing MSHCP biological resources data as part of the GPU process; and MSHCP fees and mitigation. Each of these MSHCP issue areas is summarized as follows: Modification of MSHCP within the General Plan Update Process Several individuals who commented on the General Plan Update requested that the City modify a component of the MSHCP (i.e., the Elsinore Area Plan) through a non -MSHCP process (i.e., City's General Plan Update). Unfortunately, the City cannot make changes to the MSHCP byway of the General Plan Update. Since revisions to the MSHCP are subject to review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG); and by all Permittees as part of the Joint Powers Authority (JPA), revisions cannot be done autonomously by the City in its General Plan Update. Nevertheless, there are MSCHP processes available that would address these comments received and the City is committed to pursuing those processes. The following is a discussion of how Staff is proposing to address the issues. Given the number of acres available for conservation that were lost as a result of the settlement agreement properties, the Sauls /Helix report properties, and properties subject to development agreements or other vested rights, the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) recognizes its obligation to make up that acreage throughout the entire MSHCP area. The RCA, under the oversight of FWS and DFG, and in coordination with City Staff, are currently working on a "Replacement Program" to identify lands lost from potential MHSCP conservation. RCA, FWS, and DFG agree with the City's position that compensating for acreage lost as result of prior agreements or litigation is not the City's responsibility. Although specific replacement lands have not yet been identified, it is unlikely that the compensation for the potential acreage lost to conservation will come from within the City's boundaries unless lands are identified for which development is highly infeasible. The "Replacement Program" will be processed through an appropriate MSHCP process such as Criteria Refinement, Minor Amendment, or Major Amendment, and may require additional CEQA/NEPA processing. The GPU and DEIR will be revised to remove several specifics of the MSHCP, including the target conservation acreage range, and instead reference the MSHCP as an applicable plan, separate from the General Plan. Each of these two (2) plans has been prepared in accordance with regulations and policies that are different from the other, and each is required to be implemented pursuant to their own applicable regulations and policies. Further, the City as a Permittee is required to implement the MSHCP and consider it in all decisions related to the local land planning process where appropriate. Pursuant to the AGENDA ITEM{ N0, nnnr_ 14 ., 1 n C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MSHCP Implementing Agreement, it continues to be the responsibility of every Permittee to work together within the JPA and with the RCA to acquire the 153,000 -acre Reserve Assembly. Ultimately, the General Plan Update process is not subjecting anyone to any new voluntary or conservation obligations that are not already required by other laws or regulations, or pursuant to other agreements that involve the City. It should also be noted that the City intends to revise its MSHCP Implementation Guidelines following approval of the GPU, and if possible, following approval of the "Replacement Program." This effort will involve mapping to show areas that have already been conserved or exempted from the MSHCP. The City shall conduct an annual review of its land use in relation to the conservation area mapping to assess orderly and balanced development. The City may develop its "Conceptual Reserve Design" in accordance with Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, and may rely upon the flexibility permitted by the MSHCP in conducting Reserve Assembly Accounting consistent with Section 6.7." It is important to note that the City does have discretionary decision - making authority on a project -by- project basis assuming proper compliance with MSHCP processing such as the Joint Project Review Process, but cannot change the overall goals and objectives of the MSHCP without further processing. In addition, this effort to update the City's MSHCP Implementation Guidelines will comply with the MSHCP, and may result in the initiation of a separate process requiring additional CEQA and /or NEPA to modify the MSHCP EIR/EIS that was certified in June 2003. Depending on the degree to which the City attempts to modify the MSHCP, this could likely result in an intensive CEQA/NEPA process, and an extensive review by all entities that reviewed the originally certified EIR/EIS for the MSHCP. At a minimum, this process would be subject to review by FWS, DFG, and all Permittees. As discussed above, each Permittee is required to contribute to the attainment of the overall 153,000 acres. The amount which each Permittee is required to contribute toward the overall goal of 153,000 acres is not concretely set. To assist Permittees in gauging their overall contribution, ranges of acreage conservation obligations were assigned to each Permittee. The range assigned to Lake Elsinore is 4,830 -7,870 acres, and is based upon the undeveloped acreage, existing suitable habitat, potential future habitat value and overall number of acres available for development within each Permittee's corporate limits. Part of the "Replacement Program" process and the City's update of its MSHCP Implementation Guidelines will involve a discussion of the City's MSHCP target acreage range. It is expected that the City's updated MSHCP Implementation Guidelines will require City Council approval. In addition, it should be noted that RCA, and other landowners (where appropriate), do coordinate with the City on potential acquisitions. To date, the City is not familiar with the RCA's acquisition of significant lands slated for future commercial development within the City. All lands acquired thus far have been acquired consistent with the MSHCP and in AGENDA ITEM NO. ¢AGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE cooperation with the landowners and City, and any impacts to land use resulting from conserving lands planned for economically valuable uses were analyzed in the MSHCP EIR/EIS (2003). In summary, the City cannot autonomously correct and /or revise the MSHCP via its own General Plan Update, and is bound by the current status of the MSHCP. Each plan acknowledges the existence of the other, and staff must implement both, but the City cannot correct one document via the other. To the extent that changes to the MSHCP are warranted, as discussed above, the City has committed to pursuing those changes. Because the City cannot actually change the MSHCP in this GPU, no substantive changes regarding the MSHCP have been made to the GPU and EIR. The City appreciates all comments and concerns but because they are not appropriate to include as part of the General Plan Update process, and would result in further delays to the City being able to adopt its GPU, the City will instead address MSHCP concerns in its updated MSHCP Implementation Guidelines as discussed above. Existing MSHCP Data and Project Review There are two (2) overall processes for the review of a project's consistency with the MSHCP. A project within a MSHCP criteria cell is subject to: 1) review of reserve assembly requirements: and 2) the MSHCP Section 6.0 "Plan Wide Requirements ", while projects outside of criteria cells are only subject to a MSHCP Section 6.0 review. When the MSHCP was created, lands described for conservation (i.e. placement in the Reserve Assembly) using the existing conditions of those lands was only a partial means for determining their value to the MSHCP Reserve Assembly. Other reasons for lands being described for conservation were based upon location, connectivity to other areas described for conservation, and future habitat potential that even if not encompassing high quality habitat at present, they would become part of the future adaptive management program once acquired (MSHCP Section 5.0). The Section 10(ar) incidental take permit and NCCP permit issued on the MSHCP both at the Federal and State levels, respectively, are for a long -term plan, and include both land acquisition within the first 25 years followed by the future Adaptive Management Program overthe next 50 years (MSHCP Section 5.0). The MSHCP does recognize that some of the lands described for conservation do encompass highly disturbed habitats and may not always accurately reflect existing conditions as the Plan was analyzed at a regional scale. However, acquisition of lands with disturbed conditions is still important to the long -term goals and objectives of the MSHCP as these lands are planned for future restoration and enhancement activities. To this end, the City is responsible for identifying acreage to be set aside for conservation regardless of the existing conditions. It is important to note the definition of "conservation" which states, `To use, and the use of, methods and procedures within the MSHCP Conservation Area and within the Plan Area asset forth in the MSHCP, that are necessary to bring any listed species to the point at which the measures pursuant to the Federal ACENDA ITENI i1O.—L_ MkGE—IQ_OF 12y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Endangered Species Act and to the California Fish and Game Code are no longer necessary. However, Permittees will have no duty to enhance, restore or revegetate MSHCP Conservation Area lands unless required by the Plan or agreed to through implementation of the Plan." With regard to the second MSHCP review process, the accuracy of the existing conditions specific to a project site is most important for the purposes of CEQA and for review of the project's consistency with Section 6.0 of the MSHCP. The MSHCP was prepared at a regional scale and acknowledges that errors may exist at this scale. To that end, the MSHCP does allow for site specific assessments, with site - specific corrections, to be presented in the consistency determinations. These site - specific assessments conducted at the project -level analysis are generally utilized forthose species or habitat conditionally - covered under the MSHCP. If species are discovered that are already covered under the MSHCP, then "take" of those species has already been permitted (assuming the project demonstrates consistency with Cell Criteria) regardless of what the regional scale data indicates. All of this information, including data corrections, is included in a project -level environmental document pursuant to the disclosure requirements of CEQA. Because the MSHCP does allow for site - specific assessments, with site - specific corrections, to be presented in the consistency determinations and carried forward to project - specific CEQA documents, this does not affect the legal defensibility of the program -level GPU and DEIR. MSHCP Fees and Mitigation The payment of fees and compliance with Section 6.0 is intended to provide full mitigation under the CEQA, NEPA, FESA, and CESA for development of property outside of MSHCP Conservation Area (both within and outside of the Criteria Area. This mitigation includes "take authorization" for Covered Species Adequately Conserved. Compliance with Section 6.0 includes an assessment of those species and habitats only conditionally covered by the MSHCP. Should there be any additional impacts to these conditionally- covered species or habitats, additional mitigation may be required. Any mitigation afforded by the MSHCP is based upon the assumption that the Reserve Assembly requirements are also being met. Although uncommon, there are some species and their activities that are not covered by the MSHCP. For example, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) covers potential impacts to some bird species not covered by the MSHCP. Most notably for projects within Lake Elsinore, the MBTA covers species activities such as nesting, and requires that construction activities do not impact active nests. Should issues related to MSHCP fees and mitigations require further explanation, this can be done in detail as part of the City's update to its MSHCP Implementation Guidelines. A description of the "no surprises" clause will also be included in the MSHCP Implementation Guidelines, as appropriate. Some of the comments received attempted to imply that previous agreements, vested rights, or exemptions from the MSHCP provided mitigation under the State and Federal AGENDA 170,11 NO PAGE � ®�- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Endangered Species Acts and for the CEQA and NEPA processes. Specific to any agreements or vested rights, the City would need to conduct further review to determine the extent of mitigation provided. Specific to projects exempted from the MSHCP, some are exempt from Reserve Assembly requirements but continue to be subject to Section 6.0 requirements. Specific to those projects exempted from the MSHCP as the result of litigation, these projects would be fully exempt from the MSHCP but would continue to be subject to all other applicable state and federal laws, including the State and Federal Endangered Species Acts and CEQA/NEPA, as appropriate. The Housina Element Consistenc City staff and its consultant have carefully considered the goals, policies, and programs contained within the General Plan update including Federal, State, and local requirements as well as critical needs and opportunities facing the City. The goals, policies and programs, represent in their totality the priorities of the City and its action plan to meet the aforementioned requirements, needs and opportunities through 2030 in a manner that reduces or eliminates impacts. In particular, as stated in the General Plan Update (GPU), the City relied upon its State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) approved July 2002 Housing Element when preparing this GPU. Considering that the July 2002 Housing Element is valid and operative until July 2008 as extended by HCD and given the City Council's direction to Staff to move the GPU process along, City staff and the City Attorney have determined that delaying consideration of this GPU until the 2008 Housing Element Update is complete would be unnecessary. To the extent the 2008 Housing Element Update necessitates changes be made to this GPU, changes can and will be made accordingly. Further, the goals, policies, and programs of the July 2002 Housing Element have been analyzed and determined to be consistent with the Preferred Land Use Plan and goals and policies of the GPU. As stated in Chapter 3.11, Population and Housing of the DEIR, "Implementation of the policies presented in the proposed GPU would achieve the housing goals outlined in the Housing Element." The DEIR also states: "Subsequent amendments to the General Plan would be reviewed to ensure consistency is maintained between the proposed GPU and the Housing Element. Additionally, the General Plan Update Preferred Land Use Plan was compared to the 2007 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) published by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). A sufficient number of dwelling units is provided for in the Preferred Land Use Plan to meet and exceed the number identified in the RHNA. Text has been added to Chapter 2, Community Form, Section 2.6, Housing of the General Plan Update to specifically reference how the General Plan Update Elements are consistent with the July 2002 Housing Element and to note RHNA consistency. Therefore, no inconsistencies would result from the adoption of the General Plan Update prior to CGEi:IAC, � OF l S nnf" 7J O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE completion of a future Housing Element. Moreover, with the 2008 -2014 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), the City will be asked to identify ways to facilitate construction of 5,590 units — distributed among various income categories — and otherwise provide for safe, decent housing opportunities as the region continues to grow. The City's challenge will be to define ways to accommodate its fair share of regional housing growth while satisfying broader community goals to balance land use and achieve quality development for all projects. The General Plan update addresses residential issues such as incorporating mixed use development into existing neighborhoods and developing cohesive residential neighborhoods, which will promote the goals and objectives in the Housing Element update. The City's Housing Element consultant will identify opportunities in the preferred land use plan, with the proposed Commercial and Residential Mixed Use designations which will provide higher density options for residential development. The update of the City's Housing Element is anticipated to begin public review of the first draft document in May, with initial submittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in late May or early June. Based on the past experiences with the HCD review process, and possible public interest, it is anticipated that final public hearings on the Housing Element will not occur until September 2008. Land Use Requests The vision and strategic framework of the Draft Plan was formed based on significant public input collected through a series of public workshops and working sessions with the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), as well as extensive coordination with City staff. The vision and strategic framework guided the development of both the goals and policies comprised in the document and the designated land uses comprised on the Preferred Land Use Plan and alternatives. Further, the draft land use plans were provided to key stakeholders throughout the General Plan update process, posted to the City's website for public viewing, and presented numerous times to the GPAC, for review and comment. In addition, the General Plan provides the basis for decision - making, including decisions on development approvals and exactions through the year 2030. The primary purpose of the General Plan is to ensure land use compatibility throughout the City and is intended to serve as a long -range planning tool to achieve the vision and goals and meet the needs of the City. It addresses a broad range of issues associated with the City's development at a "general ", city-wide scale. Numerous land use change requests were received during public review. Staff has thoroughly considered the requested changes received during public review and determined that aside from a limited number of exceptions, the land use changes are not AcENOA 9iicfe o9 VSO. - —f �-- Dare f - rr X PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE advisable and should not be made at this time. This determination was made for the reasons detailed below. Further, staff anticipates that additional requests may be made at the upcoming General Plan hearing(s) and would like to provide an explanation in advance. The General Plan Preferred Land Use Plan represents the long -term land use plan of the City based on its vision, goals, policies, and needs. It should not represent nor recreate the existing land use map of the City. Therefore, land use changes should not be made simply in order to retain current land uses or zoning. With regard to comments received on zoning and alleged inconsistencies, staff recognizes that adoption of the Preferred Land Use Plan or elements of the alternatives may create inconsistencies between the General Plan and Zoning maps. This was identified at the beginning of the General Plan Update process and is a common occurrence with General Plan update processes. Therefore, a comprehensive update to the City's zoning map and regulations is anticipated. General Plan Preferred Land Use Plan was developed based on the need to ensure compatibility and long -term integration of land uses throughout the City. Therefore, land use changes should not be made in order to respond to individual ownership requests that could result in "spot zoning," do not integrate with surrounding uses, and /or do not reflect the long -term vision for the respective District and City. Lastly, the entirety of the impact analysis and modeling, conclusions, and mitigation contained within the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) are based upon the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan and alternatives. In particular, the Draft Circulation Plan is based upon detailed modeling of the Preferred Land Use Plan. The integrity and defensibility of the impact conclusions contained within the Traffic Analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads and the DEIR depend upon maintaining the currently proposed Preferred Land Use Plan and alternatives. Therefore, changes to the land uses would likely result in the need for additional modeling, analysis, and additional impacts and mitigation which would require the rbcirculation of the DEIR for public review and cause further delay of the hearing and adoption of the General Plan. Land use requests to be changed by Staff Although staff has anticipated and reviewed as many land use requests in advance of the Public Review Period for the Draft EIR and the Public Hearing, there have been six (6) occasions in which projects that warranted inclusion on the Preferred Land Use Map. Please note that as reference, Staff has attached all formal written land use request letters and staffs responses to this Report (See Attachment 5). The following recommended changes to the Preferred Land Use Plan, the District Plan and General Plan text are either changes resulting in an approved and entitled project, an approved project since the Public Review Period of the DEIR, an existing Development AGENDA ITEM No.--L— PAGE, _, ®F 10 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Agreement, an oversight on an entitled Tentative Tract Map, a Specific Plan approved in 1994 and ongoing negotiations regarding the Ballpark District Area. Staff believes these changes should be reflected on the Preferred Land Use Plan, the associated District Plans and General Plan text. Notwithstanding, Changes No.1 and No. 2 identified below had been analyzed in the Draft Environmental Impact Report under Alternative 2 (High Density Alternative). Change No. 3, is recognition of an approved Development Agreement and Change No. 4 reflects an approved Specific Plan that was a part of an Annexation that was never completed through LAFCO, but was approved by the City in 1994. Change No. 5 is a reflection of the staffs vision and ongoing planning efforts in the Ballpark District. The specific properties and their recommended changes, as well as the text amendment are as follows: 1. Spyglass Specific Plan Spyglass Specific Plan, located at the terminus of Main Street at Interstate 15, east of Camino Del Norte and identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 377 - 250 -001, 377- 350 -004, 007, 010, 014 thru 017 and 377 - 260 -004 thru 006 was approved by the City Council on February 26, 2008. Prior to that time, staff had included the projected land use density, Low Medium Density (1 to 6du /ac) on Alternative 2 which was included and analyzed in Draft Environmental Impact Report. Given the Specific Plan was approved, Staff is recommending that the designation of "Approved Specific Plan" (Grey) be applied to the Preferred General Plan Land Use Plan for the subject area (See Attachment No. 6) in lieu of the Low Medium Density designation as shown on the current version of the map. 2. South Shore I (Tentative Tract Map No 31593) Tentative Tract Map No. 31593, located easterly of Interstate 15 and Camino Del Norte (previously identified as APNs 347 - 250 -006 thru 008) and northerly of the Spyglass Specific Plan area was approved by the City Council on November 8, 2005. Staff had included the projected land use density of Low Medium Density (1 to 6du /ac) for the property as shown on Alternative 2 and that designation was analyzed in Draft Environmental Impact Report. Notwithstanding this, Staff is recommending that the designation of Low Medium Density land use be applied to the Preferred General Plan Land Use Plan and associated District Plan for the subject area (See Attachment No. 7) in order to reflect the approved Tract Map. 3. Pre - annexation and Development Agreement by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Pacific Clay Products Inc A Pre - annexation and Development Agreement by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Pacific Clay Products, Inc. was entered into on October 14, 2003 ( "Entry Date ") and recorded with the County Recorder on November 10, 2003. The Development Agreement applies specifically to the area commonly known as Pacific ACENDA iTEP I N8. I PAGE U OF �0 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Clay. Recognition of this Development Agreement (DA) essentially provides the owner with vested interest in the "Existing Land Use Rules" as defined in Section 2.13 of the DA. This recognition has been depicted on the Preferred Land Use Map and the associated District Plan as a "speckled" configuration for the DA and "cross hatching" indicating the Extractive Overlay. Additionally, staff is also recommending the following text (Shown in italics below) be included in the General Plan relative to the Pre - Annexation Development Agreement by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Pacific Clay Products, Inc. under the Section heading Overlay /Special Treatment Areas within Chapter 2 (Community Form) of the General Plan. Pacific Clay Product Inc. Development Agreement Area This overlay designation, as depicted on the Preferred Land Use Map, recognizes Pre - Annexation and Development Agreement by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Pacific Clay Products, Inc., entered into on October 14, 2003 ( "Entry Date') and recorded with the County Recorder on November 10, 2003, and establishes the vested interest in the "Existing Land Use Rules. 4. La Laguna Heights Specific Plan Although, the area of the La Laguna Heights Specific Plan, located both within the County of Riverside and within the City Limits, was proposed as a part of an annexation effort that was never completed by LAFCO, Staff determined upon extensive review and analysis that the Specific Plan was approved by the City on May 10, 1994 pursuant to Ordinance No. 978 and remains an entitlement that must be recognized on the General Plan Map. As result, although this area is currently depicted as Open Space, the area (See Attachment No. 8) must be designated Approved Specific Plan. 5. Expansion of Ballpark District Considering the vision and planning efforts relative to the Diamond Stadium, surrounding development and the "Dream Extreme" logo for the City of Lake Elsinore and although not currently reflected on the Preferred Land Use Plan, staff is requesting that the Ballpark District be enlarged to include the area identified as Assessor Parcel Number 373 - 210 -030 (See Attachment No. 9). 6. Meadowbrook Sphere Since LAFCO removed the majority of the "Meadowbrook" area from the City of Lake Elsinore's Sphere of Influence (SOI) and as a result left a remaining portion AGENDA ITEM N0. oarr. 17_ nr /0 S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE within the City's Sphere of Influence, staff is recommending the removal of the Meadowbrook Sphere District from the District Plan and include the remaining portion into the Lake Elsinore Hills District (See Attachment10). ANALYSIS The proposed General Plan Update which includes the General Plan, the District Plan, the Environmental Impact Report and the General Plan Land Use Map has been prepared consistent with the Government Code Section 65300 et seq. and applicable chapters of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), which was prepared in accordance with Section 15084 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances and analyses for the proposed project. The DEIR represents the City's independent judgment and complies with the terms of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. Most of the potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the General Plan Update were determined to be mitigable as explained in the Draft EIR. Notwithstanding this, however, the Draft EIR also concluded that the following potentially significant environmental impacts would result in unavoidable adverse impacts: population projections on land use; East Lake District Plan land use incompatibility; effects of land use changes on other environmental issue areas; traffic noise; noise associated with future road improvements within District Plan areas; construction impacts associated with ozone, CO, and particulate matter; inconsistency with the air quality management plan; exceedance of SCAQMD thresholds during operations; operational impacts associated with ozone, CO, particulate matter, VOCs, other criteria pollutant emissions, and greenhouse gases; cumulative impacts associated with operations; and, long- and short-term impacts related to the implementation of the Third Street Annexation. However, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, which "balances" the proposed project against this unavoidable environmental effects. Finally, with regard to the MSHCP, a Resolution is not required at this time. The GPU is a "programmatic" effort with the City continuing to reserve the right to conduct project -level review on each development proposal. This project -level review would include a MSHCP consistency review for each future discretionary action, as appropriate. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt: AGENDA ITEM N®. PAGE®L 3 0 F La_ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending City Council Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 20051211019 with the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -_ recommending City Council Approval of the General Plan Update. Prepared by: Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Developme ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 - recommending City Council Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 20051211019 with the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -_ recommending City Council Approval of the General Plan Update. 3. Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), including Errata and Responses to Comments. 4. General Plan Response Letters. 5. Large exhibits of the Preferred Land Use Plan; Alternative No. 1 Land Use Plan; and, Alternative No. 2 Land Use Plan. 6. Spyglass Specific Plan Exhibit. 7. South Shore I (Tentative Tract Map No. 31593) Exhibit. 8. La Laguna Heights Specific Plan Exhibit 9. Expansion of the Ballpark District Exhibit 10. Meadowbrook Sphere District Exhibit AGENDA IT[M No.- PAGE L Qc (QS RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore has initiated an update of their General Plan (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City ") has caused an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2006121069: the "EIR ") to be prepared on the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.: "CEQA "), the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000, et seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's procedures relating to environmental evaluation of public and private projects; and WHEREAS, the City transmitted for filing a Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR on November 15, 2005 in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse again on December 5, 2005 for distribution to those agencies which have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, the City transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter, in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those agencies which have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the State Clearing House posted the Draft EIR for a 45 -day public comment period which ran from December 5, 2007 to January 18, 2008; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082(c)(1), on November 30, 2005, the City held a duly noticed scoping meeting in order to expedite consultation regarding the scope and content of the environmental information in the Draft EIR; and AGENDA ITEhl 130. PAGE- `' S OF _ f 0.5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - PAGE2OF4 WHEREAS, all actions required to be taken by applicable law related to the preparation, circulation, and review of the Draft EIR have been taken; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR prepared for the Project was sent to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public input on the adequacy of the Draft EIR on April 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Draft EIR. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the EIR for the Project is adequate and has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted by the City pursuant thereto. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Draft EIR and finds that the Draft EIR represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates herein as its "findings of fact' regarding the potential environmental impacts of the Project, the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Draft EIR (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth); the following summarizes those conclusions: a. The Draft EIR determined that impacts related to the implementation of the Project would be less than significant without mitigation specific for land dedicated to agricultural uses, hazards related to geothermal resources, and geotechnical resources associated with the implementation of the Third Street Annexation. b. The Draft EIR identified potentially significant adverse impacts related to the implementation of the Project, but which will be mitigated to less than significant levels by conditions imposed upon the Project. These include impacts associated with land use, cultural and paleontological resources, aesthetics, transportation and circulation, noise, air quality, biological resources, hydrology and water quality, hazards and hazardous materials, geology and soils, and community services and facilities. For those impacts that are not mitigabee, see subsection (e) below. The type of impact for which mitigation was designed and the associated mitigation measures are identified in Section 3.0 Environmental Analysis of the Draft EIR, and are summarized in the Executive Summary of the Draft EIR. C. All feasible mitigation measures, which are within the jurisdiction of the City, as identified in the Draft EIR have been incorporated into the Project AGENDA ITEM 6jo( (— PAGF-_16 OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - PAGE 3 OF 4 and represent the fullest extent to which the Project - related impacts can be reasonably avoided and /or substantially lessened. d. The Draft EIR did not identify alternatives to the Project which would reduce environmental impacts while still substantially achieving Project objectives, and as such, the proposed Project was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative. e. The Project will result in significant unavoidable impacts related specifically to: population projections on land use; East Lake District Plan land use incompatibility; effects of land use changes on other environmental issue areas; traffic noise; noise associated with future road improvements within District Plan areas; construction impacts associated with ozone, CO, and particulate matter; inconsistency with the air quality management plan; exceedance of SCAQMD thresholds during operations; operational impacts associated with ozone, CO, particulate matter, VOCs, other criteria pollutant emissions, and greenhouse gases; cumulative impacts associated with operations; and, long- and short-term impacts related to the implementation of the Third Street Annexation. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council has determined that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from project implementation are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the project. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared and is attached hereto as Exhibit A (Findings of Fact) and incorporated herein. SECTION 4. A mitigation monitoring program for the Project has been prepared in accordance with Section 21081.6 of CEQA, and the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the mitigation monitoring program. SECTION 5. Based upon all of the evidence presented and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore certify Environmental Impact for the Project with Errata and Responses to Comments, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ) -7 OF �.S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 4 OF 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore AGE.P DA ITEM NO. PAGEOe 0 EXHIBIT A ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE State Clearinghouse Number 200512019 SECTION I BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION PROJECT OVERVIEW A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update ( "GPU ") and related discretionary actions in the City of Lake Elsinore. The City is proposing the establishment of an updated General Plan. The City is the Lead Agency for the preparation of this Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Update (GPU) pursuant to Section 15050 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The purpose of the EIR is to objectively evaluate and disclose the potential environmental impacts of the GPU to the public and governmental decision - makers. It is intended that this program EIR analyze and mitigate, to the extent necessary, potentially significant environmental impacts associated with'the GPU and the Preferred Land Use Plan. Furthermore, it is intended that this program EIR be used with later activities to determine whether additional environmental documentation is necessary and, if so, to be used with subsequent EIRs and negative declarations to simplify the task of preparing these documents. The components of the proposed project include the following: Comprehensive update of the General Plan chapters, goals and policies; referred to in this document as the GPU. Creation of a new Land Use Plan that includes Planning Districts and revised land use designations; referred to in this document as the Preferred Land Use Plan. This document also addresses two alternative Land Use Plans: 1) a lower density alternative referred to as Alternative 1; and 2) a higher density alternative referred to as Alternative 2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND EIR SCOPING This document complies with the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA," Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Title 14, §15000 et seq.). In compliance with CEQA, the City of Lake Elsinore has solicited and considered comments from Responsible and Trustee Agencies, members of the public, and other interested parties during the proposed project's various environmental review processes: • In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, the City prepared and distributed an NOP of an EIR. The NOP was distributed on November 15, 2005. In furtherance of tribal Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA I.01168ge 1 aiinr I Q na 109 consultation, the NOP was distributed to local Native American tribes in December 2005. Communications with SCH) staff on December 2, 2005, showed that the November NOP had not been received by some agencies. Based on direction from SCH staff, the November NOP was resent for SCH distribution on December 2, 2005. In addition, an EIR scoping meeting for Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, and other agencies was held on November 30, 2005. The comments received on the NOP were used to establish the scope of the issues addressed in the Draft EIR. FINAL EIR CERTIFICATION AND PROJECT APPROVAL PROCESS 1. FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA The City Council (the decision- making body) of the City of Lake Elsinore (the CEQA Lead Agency) certifies the Final EIR, which consists of the Draft EIR (SCH No. 200512019) and the Responses to Comments. Since the Draft EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts prior to mitigation, the City Council must also prepare "findings" as part of its action to certify that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and to approve the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, no public agency shall approve or carry out a projectforwhich an environmental impact report has been certified, which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out, unless the public agency makes one or more findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale of each finding. The possible findings, which must be supported by substantial evidence in the record, are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. 2. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities fcrr highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. 2. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The Draft EIR identified several significant environmental effects (or "impacts ") resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Some of these significant effects can be fully avoided /mitigated through the adoption of feasible mitigation measures. For those significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance, the City Council is required to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the proposed project. The State CEQA Guidelines at Section 15093(a) provide that if specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA I-rEhl b &ge 2 oanr ins IDS. As indicated in Section 5.2.4 (CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations), two environmental effects of the proposed project cannot be reduced to less than significant levels by the adoption of feasible mitigation measures or feasible environmentally superior alternatives. Direct- and cumulative -level air quality and noise impacts and cumulative -level land use impacts have been identified as unavoidable and significant and require the preparation of a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Section II describes those effects and outlines the City's findings with respect to the environmental effects of the proposed project. 3. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared to monitor and report the implementation of the mitigation measures, project design features, and standard conditions (SCs) identified for the proposed project. The MMRP will be adopted concurrently with these findings, and will be implemented through the final design, construction and post - construction periods. To the extent that these findings conclude that all mitigation measures outlined in the Draft EIR are feasible and have not been modified, superseded, or withdrawn, the City hereby binds itself to implement these measures. These findings, in other words, are not merely informational, but rather constitute a binding set of obligations that will come into effect when the City Council formally approves the proposed project. 4. CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR AND ADOPTION OF FINDINGS The City Council will review and consider the information contained in the Final EIR, as well as submissions from public officials, public agencies and the general public. Prior to project approval, the City Council shall certify that the Final EIR reflects the City's independentjudgment and analysis. Having considered the foregoing information, as well as any and all other information in the record, the City Council shall make findings pursuant to CEQA Section 21081. In accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council shall adopt the Findings as part of its certification of the Final EIR for the proposed project. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 AGENDA ITEM No, SECTION If PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION The City of Lake Elsinore (City) is located in the southwestern portion of Riverside County. Interstate -15 (1 -15) and the Ortega Highway —State Route -74 (SR -74) extend through the City. The City encompasses approximately 25,061.1 acres and is bordered to the south, north, and east by unincorporated lands within the County of Riverside; and to the east by the City of Canyon Lake. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The General Plan Update (GPU) involves: The comprehensive update of the General Plan chapters, goals and policies; referred to in this document as the GPU. The creation of a new Land Use Plan that includes Planning Districts and revised land use designations; referred to in this document as the Preferred Land Use Plan. This document also addresses two alternative Land Use Plans: 1) a lower density alternative referred to in this document as Alternative 1; and 2) a higher density alternative referred to in this document as Alternative 2. GPU CHAPTERS The existing General Plan format will be extensively reorganized by the GPU. All of the state mandated elements will be addressed, but the elements will be presented in an alternative format that is intended to be more user - friendly. The GPU includes three chapters: Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation. Administrative and Implementation Programs for each of these chapters are also included in the GPU. Community Form The Community Form chapter includes a discussion of the strategic framework as well as elements of land use, historic preservation, transportation and circulation, growth management, parks and recreation, community facilities and services, housing, green building strategies, and district plans. Public Safety and Welfare The Public Safety and Welfare chapter addresses issues associated with the safety and welfare of the City's general public. The sections include air quality, hazards (including natural disasters), and noise. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDAITBA We 4 PAGE 2-a of 0 Resource Protection and Preservation The Resource Protection and Preservation chapter sets forth policies and programs to preserve biological resources, open space, water resources, cultural and paleontological resources, and aesthetics. LAND USE PLAN— PREFERRED LAND USE PLAN The Preferred Land Use Plan shows the updated land uses as compared to the existing General Plan. The Preferred Land Use Plan serves as a guide to planners, the general public, and decision makers for setting the ultimate pattern of development of the City at buildout. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The GPU includes residential, commercial, mixed use, industrial, and other land use designations to depict the types of land uses that will be allowed throughout the City. Each land use designation is defined in terms of the allowable uses and density and intensity standards. DISTRICT PLANS The City is divided into 16 District Plans for propertywithin or partially within City limits and 5 Sphere District Plans for districts located within the Sphere of Influence but outside of the City Limits. Each District Plan will provide goals and policies that guide development within the District Plan. PLANNING AREAS The Preferred Land Use Plan and Alternatives 1 and 2 identify land use designations within Planning Areas outside of the SOL The Planning Areas are included on the Preferred Land Use Plan to show existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses that would be located adjacent to areas within the City and the SO]. Land uses within these Planning Areas are addressed in the technical analysis of traffic generation in the EIR. However, considering the City would not have any jurisdiction over development within the Planning Areas they are not considered projectfeatures of the GPU and, therefore, are not addressed specifically in the EIR. LAND USE SUMMARY The planning horizon for the proposed GPU is 2030. The City buildout population would be 205,070. The total amount of housing at buildout is anticipated to be 67,841 dwelling units. The proposed buildout population and housing level represents a reduction in total population and housing units from that anticipated by the existing General Plan. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM .Rge 5 DAM ') _i AS l7 � 3RD STREET ANNEXATION In addition to the GPU and the associated alteration to land use designations throughout the City and Sphere Of Influence, the project addressed by this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) includes annexing an approximately 320 -acre parcel from the County to the City (the "3`d Street Annexation "). The 3rd Street annexation entails pre- zoning the parcel for consistency with City zones. This action will further require revision of the City's Zoning Ordinance to properly implement the pre- zoning conditions. The proposed annexation would allow increased efficiency in service provisions to the area, which is almost completely surrounded by incorporated land, and represent a more orderly planning and development pattern than would occur if the land remained in the County's jurisdiction. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The City objectives for the proposed GPU are as follows: • Create a General Plan consistent with state law that guides City planning until 2030. • Create a Land Use Plan that encourages the creation of a vibrant and active downtown and a lake destination. • Create a plan to preserve the unique topography and visual character of the City through the preservation of steep slopes. • Create a General Plan that recognizes the rich history of the City and preserves historical resources. • Create a user - friendly plan for City officials, staff, and the community of Lake Elsinore. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEfRto G PACE a �f 0 SECTION III ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds can be mitigated to a level of less than significant through the imposition of feasible mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and set forth herein, are described in this section. 1. LAND USE Impact: Impact3.1.4a: The community character of the area could significantly change with the implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Through implementation of the goals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety, and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU, the community character of the area would not significantly change with the implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan. Established communities would not be divided or changed significantly in a negative way with the implementation of the Preferred Alternative. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the goals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. With implementation of these goals and policies individual development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant adverse land use compatibility impacts. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or Incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts to community character associated with implementation of future projects to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because, with implementation of the goals and policies of the GPU individual development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant adverse land use compatibility impacts. The goals and policies in the Community Form Chapter as well as the Preferred Land Use Plan encourage establishment of mixed use developments and require physical and visual buffers between land uses characterized by differing functions and density to ensure land use compatibility. Goals and Policies in the Resource Protection and Preservation chapter encourage future developments to incorporate existing natural resources as well as existing historic and cultural resources that are important features of Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 7 f 1 G �' IJ(lC the City. The Public Safety and Welfare section addresses public safety and welfare issues that must be incorporated into future developments and provision of adequate public services. b. Impact: Impact 3.1.4.b: Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant adverse land use compatibility impacts. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Through implementation of the goals and policies of the of the Community Form, Public Safety, and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU, development in accordance with the proposed land use designations would not result in significant adverse land use compatibility impacts. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation ofrelevantgoals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. With implementation of these goals and policies individual development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in any significant incompatibilities between land uses. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed projectwhich mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to land use compatibility associated with implementation of future projects to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because, individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the goals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. The goals and policies in the Community Form Chapter as well as the Preferred Land Use Plan encourage establishment of mixed use developments and require physical and visual buffers between land uses characterized by differing functions and density to ensure land use compatibility. The Public Safety and Welfare section addresses public safety and welfare issues that must be incorporated into future developments and provision of adequate public services. C. Impact: Impact 3.1.4.e: Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant inconsistencies with the MSHCP. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 8 AGENDA IiE?I Nt3.._.. —,T-_� �r Through implementation of the goals and policies of the of the Community Form, Public Safety, and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU, development in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan designations would notresult in significant inconsistencies with the MSHCP. Implementation of the GPU, the Preferred Land Use Plan, and District Plans could result in significant impacts related to disturbance of areas described for conservation in the MSHCP. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans in accordance with the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter Biological Resources Section, Goa/ 1, Policies 1.1 -1.11 will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with areas described for conservation in the MSHCP Conservation Areas. Future projects may be allowed to alter the Conservation Area boundaries through criteria refinement, minor amendments, or other means, but would be required to do so in conformance with all regulations and mitigation requirements of the MSHCP. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to inconsistency with the MSHCP associated with implementation of future projects to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because, future projects may be allowed to alter the Conservation Area boundaries through criteria refinement, minor amendments, or other means, but would be required to do so in conformance with all regulations and mitigation requirements of the MSHCP. This would reduce potential impacts related to consistency of future development with the MSHCP to less than significant levels. d. Impact: Impact 3.1.4.g: Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation area could result in significant adverse land use compatibility impacts. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Development of land use designations within the 3rd Street Annexation will result in less - than- significant impacts on community character considering that the land uses proposed within the annexation area are designed to be internally compatible and to be compatible with adjacent existing uses. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation ofrelevantgoals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. With implementation of these goals and policies individual development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in any significant incompatibilities between land uses. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 AGENDA iTx:M No, Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to land use compatibility within the 3rd Street Annexation Area projects to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because, individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of relevant goals and policies of the Community Form, Public Safety and Welfare, and Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. The goals and policies in the Community Form Chapter as well as the Preferred Land Use Plan encourage establishment of mixed use developments and require physical and visual buffers between land uses characterized by differing functions and density to ensure land use compatibility. The Public Safety and Welfare section addresses public safety and welfare issues that must be incorporated into future developments and provision of adequate public services. 2. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. Impact: Impact 3.2.4.a: Historical Resources. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in impacts on significant historic resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Through implementation of the GPU goals and policies, all potentially significant historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources impacts can be mitigated. Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5, 7.1 -7.6, and 8.1 -8.3 at a programmatic level, will prevent the GPU from resulting in significant impacts on cultural and paleontological resources occurring within the planning area. Specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant historical resources impacts through implementation of mitigation measures identified in this EIR. Future projects will be required to mitigate impacts on cultural resources through implementation of the City's standard tribal mitigation measures, as amended from time to time and as modified through tribal consultation. MM Cultural/Paleontological Resources 1: Prior to issuance of grading permit(s) for the project, the project applicant shall retain an archaeological monitor to monitor all ground - disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. MM Cultural /Paleontological Resources 2: At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the Appropriate Tribe to notify that Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA I7 cM IP0 ge 10 ' grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. MM Cultural /Paleontological Resources 3: Prior to issuance of any grading permit the project archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City and County (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM Cultural /Paleontological Resources Z the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground breaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirectgrading activities in consultation with the project archeologist. MM CulturaUPaleontological Resources 4: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within a reasonable timeframe. Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. MM CulturaUPaleontological Resources 5: The landownershall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Appropriate Tribe forproper treatment and disposition. MM Cultural /Paleontological Resources 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. MM CulturaUPaleontological Resources 7: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Appropriate Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the Developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation forsuch resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Appropriate Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the CDD shall be appealable to the City of Lake Elsinore. MM Cultural /Paleontological Resources 8. Individual projects implemented in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan shall also demonstrate compliance with Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5, 7.1 -7.6, and 8.1 -8.3. As well as compliance with applicable District Plan Policies related to cultural and paleontological resources. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEIF.VO 11 PAGE -�- -p 1 OF /OS Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to cultural and historic resources to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encourage preservation of cultural and historic resources as well as preparation of cultural and historic resources reports and coordination with Native American tribes. Future projects will be required to mitigate impacts on cultural resources through implementation of the City's standard tribal mitigation measures, as amended from time to time and as modified through tribal consultation. In addition, specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant cultural and paleontological resources impacts through implementation of the construction and development monitoring program identified in the DEIR. b. Impact: Impact 3.2.4.b: Archaeological Resources. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in impacts on significant archeological resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5 and 7.1 -7.6 will prevent the GPU, at a programmatic level, from resulting in significant impacts on archaeological resources occurring within the planning area. Specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the projects will not entail significant archaeological resources impacts through implementation of mitigation measures identified above for impact 3.2.4a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Through implementation of the GPU goals and policies, all potentially significant historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources impacts can be mitigated. Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5, 7.1 -7.6, and 8.1 -8.3 at a programmatic level, will prevent the GPU from resulting in significant impacts on cultural and paleontological resources occurring within the planning area because these policies encourage for preservation of cultural and historic resources. The policies also encourage preparation of archaeological resources reports in coordination with Native American Tribes. Future projects will be required to mitigate impacts on cultural resources through implementation of the City's standard tribal mitigation measures, as amended from time to time and as modified through tribal consultation. In addition, specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant historical resources impacts through implementation of the construction and development monitoring program identified for impact 3.2.4a. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 12 AGENDA ITEM NO. C. Impact: Impact 3.2.4.c: Paleontological Resources. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in impacts on significant paleontological resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 8.1 -8.3 will prevent the GPU, at a programmatic level, from resulting in significant impacts on paleontological resources. Specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant paleontological resources impacts through implementation of mitigation measures identified in this EIR. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to paleontological resources to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because these policies encourage for preservation of paleontological resources through implementation of the construction and development monitoring program identified for impact 3.2.4a. d. Impact: Impact 3.2.4.d: District Plans. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the District Plans could result in impacts on significant cultural and paleontological resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5, 7.1 -7.6, and 8.1- 8.3, at a programmatic level, will prevent the district plans from resulting in significant impacts on cultural and paleontological resources. Specific projects undertaken pursuant to the district plans must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources impacts through implementation of mitigation measures identified in for impact 3.2.4a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to cultural and historic resources within the District Plans to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encourage preservation of cultural and historic resources as well as preparation of cultural and historic Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 13 AGENDA ITEM ND. resources reports and coordination with Native American tribes. Future projects will be required to mitigate impacts on cultural resources through implementation of the City's standard tribal mitigation measures, as amended from time to time and as modified through tribal consultation. In addition, specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant cultural and paleontological resources impacts through implementation of the construction and development monitoring program identified in the DEIR. e. Impact: Impact 3.2.4.e: 3rd Street Annexation. Implementation of individual projects within the 3rd Street Annexation Area could result in impacts on significant cultural and paleontological resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Adherence to Cultural and Paleontological Resources Policies 6.1 -6.5, 7.1 -7.6, and 8.1- 8.3, at the programmatic level, will prevent the 3rd Street Annexation from resulting in significant impacts on cultural and paleontological resources. Specific projects undertaken pursuant to the 3rd Street Annexation must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources impacts through implementation of mitigation measures identified for impact 3.2.4a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to cultural and historic resources within the District Plans to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encourage preservation of cultural and historic resources as well as preparation of cultural and historic resources reports and coordination with Native American tribes. Future projects will be required to mitigate impacts on cultural resources through implementation of the City's standard tribal mitigation measures, as amended from time to time and as modified through tribal consultation. In addition, specific projects undertaken pursuant to the GPU must demonstrate that the project will not entail significant cultural and paleontological resources impacts through implementation of the construction and development monitoring program identified in the DEIR. 3. AESTHETICS a. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.a: A large amount of vacant land in the City and SOI is designated for development. The increased development on currently vacant lands within the City is a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The following goals and policies of the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation section must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 14 P ACE `3_OF�_ 0 associated with 1) development on currently vacant land, 2) development in proximity to the lake, 3) development of commercial and industrial land uses in proximity to residential land uses, 4) development of the land uses anticipated in the district plans: Future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. Preparation of visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the GPU goals and policies would be required for future development projects located in scenic viewsheds along the 1 -15 corridorand otherareas at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. Mitigation Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Aesthetics Section Goal 9 Policies 9.1 -9.6: Policies 9.1 through 9.6 protect views and specify design requirements for new development to minimize visual impacts. Policies 9.1 and 9.2 preserve the City's nonurban visual character, in particular the surrounding hillsides, which topographically define the lake region, discourage development that blocks or substantially alters public views of Lake Elsinore and local ridgelines, and require hillside development to include private and public viewpoints. Policy 9.2 preserves the City's nonurban visual character, in particular the surrounding hillsides, which topographically define the lake region. Policies 9.3 through 9.6 require design and landscaping guidelines for new development and redevelopment, including architectural and streetscape, in order to preserve the City's nonurban, semi -rural character. Goal 10 Policies 10.1 -10.7: Aesthetics Goal 10 of the GPU protects visual character by minimizing activities, development, and landform modification that could distract viewers from the City's visual character. Policy 10.1 discourages development that blocks or substantially alters public views of Lake Elsinore and local ridgelines. Policy 10.2 encourages the dedication of open space in hillside development proposals to preserve and enhance view opportunities from transportation corridors and surrounding development. Policy 10.3 encourages new development and redevelopment to incorporate views of Lake Elsinore from roadways and other public spaces that provide residents and tourists with scenic vistas to the water, marinas, and lakeshore activities. Policy 10.4 states that the City shall establish a series of community gateways for individual communities to promote the visual character of the area. The policies of the GPU protect the citywide visual character from potentially significant impacts of buildout of the GPU. The character of the Historic District will be protected through the Historic District Plan and the other district plans, as discussed below. In addition, Policy 10.5 addresses historic landmarks and encourages their preservation through identification, signage, and refurbishment. With adherence to these goals and policies cumulative effects of future developmenton visual character and visual quality from public vantage points and viewsheds would be less than significant. Goal 11 Policies 11.1 -11.3: Policy 11.1 discourages extractive activity from being conducted in highly visible areas and requires reclamation of these mining areas. If such uses must occur in visible areas, the City shall require extensive visual screening with landscaping and /or Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 15 AGENDA ITEM NHS. fencing. Policy 11.2 discourages extractive uses or development that entails excessive light and glare visible from private and public viewpoints. Policy 11.3 requires grading plans for any hillside development to include specifications for revegetation and new planting to minimize hillside scarring. Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Open Space Section Goal 3 Policies 3.1, 3. 2, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. Policy 3.1 calls for maximizing the MSHCP conservation areas and other open space that is available for public use. Policy 3.2 encourages the preservation of watercourses, canyons, ridgelines, and rock outcroppings. Policy 3.4 encourages open space easement dedication in undisturbed and /or revegetated areas on private property, regardless of its MSHCP designation. Open Space Policies 3.5 and 3.6 prevent development on steep slopes of greater than 35 percent incline through the project review process and encourage dedication of open space easements in areas containing steep slopes. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to conversion of vacant land to urban uses to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encouraging preservation of landforms, open space and views. In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. Preparation of visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the GPU goals and policies would be required for future development projects located in scenic viewsheds along the 1 -15 corridor and other areas at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. b. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.b: Hillsides to the south and west of the lake as well as in the north are planned for hillside residential development, and this development would result in a significant impact on views of hillsides from 1 -15, SR -74, the campground, and the boat launch. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to hillside views to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encouraging preservation of landforms, open space and Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM t11tge 16 PAGE,�_OF� �� views. In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. C. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.c: Views of the lake would not be obstructed but would include an increased amount of development surrounding the lake on all sides, including hillside development on the southwest side of the lake, which would result in an impact on views from SR -74. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to views of the lake to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encouraging preservation of landforms, open space and views. Policies of the GPU discourage development that blocks or substantially alters public views of Lake Elsinore and local ridgelines. Policies also encourage the dedication of open space in hillside development proposals to preserve and enhance view opportunities from transportation corridors and surrounding development. Policies also encourage new development and redevelopment to incorporate views of Lake Elsinore from roadways and other public spaces that provide residents and tourists with scenic vistas to the water, marinas, and lakeshore activities In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.d: The conversion of vacant land is considered a significant impact on views from the baseball stadium. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to views from the baseball stadium to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encourage preservation of landforms, open space and views. The GPU includes a district plan related to the ballbark that contains specific policies designed to ensure preservation of the character of the Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA IT[,, g ge 17 . stadium including views from the stadium. In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. e. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.e: The addition of the residential development surrounding the lake would significantly affect visual character as the viewer looks toward the lake and sees residential development where undeveloped land once existed. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4.a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to views of the lake to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encourage preservation of landforms, open space and views. The GPU includes two district plans related to the lake that contain specific policies designed to ensure preservation of the visual character of the lake. In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.f- Where commercial or industrial uses would be adjacent to or mixed with residential uses, night lighting from new uses or buildings could create some lighting disturbance for nearby residences. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4.a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to impacts from lighting to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies designed to minimize impacts from lighting. Policies of the GPU discourage uses or development that entails excessive light and glare visible from private and public vantage points. Impact: Impact 3.3.4.g: District Plans. Residential development in the East Lake District would affect views from the 1 -15 and ballpark vantage points. In the North Central Sphere, hillside residential development would affect views from the open space lands looking west. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NCPAge 1t; PAGE__. OF In the Lake View Sphere, views of low -lying areas of the district would be altered with increased residential development, and views of hillsides would be affected with increased hillside residential development. In Lakeland Village, views of the hillsides from the lake edge would be affected by hillside development. From Country Club Heights, public views of hillsides would be affected by increased hillside development. In the Meadowbrook Sphere, hillside development would alter views from lower elevations and from SR -74. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.3.4. a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the District Plans to views to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU policies encouraging preservation of landforms, open space and views. Goals and policies within the District Plans also include specific policies designed to address preservation or enhancement of important views within each District Plan. In addition, future development projects will be required to prepare visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the applicable GPU goals and policies. Preparation of visual simulations demonstrating compliance with the GPU goals and policies would be required for future development projects located in scenic viewsheds along the 1 -15 corridor and other areas at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. 4. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION a. Impact: Impact 3.4.5.a: Results of Traffic Analysis. With implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan all roadways within the study area would be expected to have substantial traffic volumes and nearly all of the intersection analysis locations would require improvements. Therefore, implementation of the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts on traffic levels within the City and SOL Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The Traffic study includes the LOS for intersections after buildout of the GPU along with improvements suggested in the traffic study. As shown in the Traffic Study (Appendix C to this document), all study area intersections would operate at acceptable LOS during peak hours after implementation of the proposed improvements. In addition, some intersections currently warrant a traffic signal and additional intersections would warrant a traffic signal with buildout of the GPU. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies set forth Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NOPage 19 [ �.nr -C% nr. /0 S by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter. With implementation of these goals and polices individual projects implemented in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on traffic levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to traffic levels to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter. The ultimate roadway and intersection classifications of the Preferred Land Use plan are designed to ensure that roadway sections and intersections would operate at acceptable Levels of Service upon buildout of the General Plan. b. Impact: Impact 3.4.5.b: Bikeways. Implementation of individual projects and associated population growth anticipated in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts on existing bikeways or create hazards by failing to support alternative modes of transportation. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies setforth by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter. With implementation of these goals and polices individual projects implemented in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not result insignificant and unavoidable adverse impacts on bikeways and will provide adequate opportunities for alternative transportation by providing additional bikeways within the City. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to bicycle routes to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU Community Form Chapter and the Capital Improvements Program which includes provisions for bikeways. Individual projects implemented in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM Neage 20 PAGE 2, 9) OF-/ O S result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on bikeways and will provide adequate opportunities for alternative transportation by providing additional bikeways within the City. C. Impact: Impact 3.4.5.c: Truck Routes. Implementation of individual projects and associated population growth anticipated in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts on existing truck routes or create hazards by failing to provide adequate truck routes. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter. With implementation of these goals and polices individual projects implemented in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on existing and planned truck routes. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to truck routes to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the GPU Community Form Chapterand the Capital Improvements Program which includes provisions for truck routes. Individual projects implemented in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on truck routes. d. Impact: Impact 3.4.5.d: Implementation of the GPU and the Preferred Land Use Plan would increase population and the need for parking resulting in•a significant impact on existing parking supplies. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts at the project level. In addition, as discussed in Section 2.4.2 of the Community Form Chapter, Circulation section, the transportation network provides for parking facilities. Parking needs are also addressed in the individual District Plans (Section 2.10 of the Community Form Chapter including Business District Policy BD -5; Section 2.5, Transportation/Circulation (of the Ballpark District Plan); and Historic District Policy HD 2.5). As a result, the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would not result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on existing and planned parking supplies. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO.Page 21 PAS ci OF ( 0 Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to parking to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the transportation network of the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan provides for parking facilities. Parking needs are also addressed in the individual District Plans. e. Impact: Impact 3.4.5.e: 3rd Street Annexation. implementation of individual projects and associated population growth anticipated in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation could result in significant impacts on traffic levels and create hazards associated with existing roadway and intersection design features that are inadequate to accommodate increased traffic. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts through: • implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program, • the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter, and • implementation of improvements to signalization and the curve radius for the alignment from 2nd Street to Camino Del Norte identified in the Traffic Study. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU within the 3rd Street Annexation area to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts though implementation of the roadway and intersection classifications shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan, the Capital Improvement Program, and the circulation section of the Community Form Chapter of the GPU. The ultimate roadway and intersection classifications of the Preferred Land Use plan are designed to ensure that roadway sections and intersections would operate at acceptable Levels of Service upon buildout of the General Plan. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 22 U 0 fire 10 S Impact: Impact 3.4.5.f: Cumulative Impacts. Implementation of individual projects and associated population growth anticipated in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts on traffic levels and create hazards associated with existing roadway and intersection design features that are inadequate to accommodate increased traffic. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The GPU Circulation Element presented in this section reflects cumulative conditions. This means that future conditions projected with the 2030 Preferred Land Use Plan and recommended transportation network take into account traffic expected to occur from other regional growth, regardless of the development that occurs within the City. Considering, as discussed above under Impact 3.4.5a, that with improvements proposed as a part of the Circulation Element, all intersections would operate at acceptable LOS at buildout of the General Plan, the GPU would not result in significant direct or cumulative impacts related to traffic. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation Section of the Community Form Chapter. With implementation of these goals and policies and implementation of the Capital Improvement Program, the contribution of population growth in the City to cumulative traffic impacts would be less than significant. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to traffic levels to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program as well as the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation section of the Community Form Chapter. The GPU Circulation Element presented in this section reflects cumulative conditions. This means that future conditions projected with the 2030 Preferred Land Use Plan and recommended transportation network take into account traffic expected to occur from other regional growth, regardless of the development that occurs within the City. The ultimate roadway and intersection classifications of the Preferred Land Use plan are designed to ensure that roadway sections and intersections would operate at acceptable Levels of Service upon build -out of the General Plan. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM N0. I Page 23 nwnc r 1 -Z1 3 5. NOISE a. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.a: Construction - Related Noise. Implementation of the GPU has the potential to result in temporary construction noise received by nearby residents, schools, commercial areas, and other receptors that could exceed acceptable levels set forth in the Zoning Code. GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards. The generation of noise levels exceeding relevant standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Construction - Related Noise. The City shall require project applicants to demonstrate their compliance with City standards regarding construction noise. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the construction noise to acceptable levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to construction noise levels to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts from construction noise would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Existing standards include restrictions on construction activities and limits on construction hours that reduce noise levels associated with construction. b. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.c: Noise from Industrial and Mining Operations. GPU projects have the potential to place new industrial and mining operations in proximity to sensitive receptors, and vice versa, such that relevant noise standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards) would be exceeded. GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards and to discourage the juxtaposition of noisy industrial /mining uses with sensitive uses. Placement of new uses that exceed relevant noise standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Noise from Industrial and Mining Operations. For projects proposing new industriaUmining operations in the vicinity of sensitive receptors orprojects thatpropose newsensitive uses in the vicinity of industrial /mining operations, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM t NO. ®( =age 24 PAGE, `fa OF 0 Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels from industrial and mining operations to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts from mining and industrial operations would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Existing standards include restrictions on activities and limits on operational hours that reduce noise levels associated with these types of activities. C. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.d: Commercial Noise. The GPU proposes commercial uses that could generate noise received by residences and other sensitive receptors in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards. Placement of new uses that exceed relevant noise standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Commercial Noise. For projects proposing new commercial uses in the vicinity of sensitive receptors, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards maybe exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels from commercial operations to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. The City noise standards contain specific requirements for reducing noise levels associated with commercial projects. Existing standards include restrictions on activities and limits on operational hours that reduce noise levels associated with commercial uses. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 25 AGENDA ITEM Ito. I Impact: Impact 3.5.5.e: Airport Noise. The GPU proposes development that could receive noise from adjacent airfields in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards. Placement of new uses that exceed relevant noise standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Airport Noise. For projects proposing sensitive uses that may receive airport noise, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels from airport operations to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts from airport noise on sensitive uses would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Existing standards include restrictions on the types of land uses that can be located in the vicinity of an airport. e. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.f: School Noise. The GPU proposes new residential development that could receive noise from adjacent schools in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards. Placement of new uses that exceed relevant noise standards would be considered a significant impact. The GPU would entail construction of new schools that have the potential to receive noise exceeding state standards. Exceeding state standards for school noise would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): School Noise. For residential projects proposed adjacent to schools, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. The City shall require all school projects to conduct site - specific noise analysis in accordance with State requirements. Environmental Findings General Plan Update City f Lake Elsinore ADEN ®AITOA Nb. 26 PACE_ _ Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels from school operations to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts from schools on sensitive land uses would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Existing standards include restrictions on the types of land uses that can be located in the vicinity of a school and include measures that can be incorporated into the design of a project that would reduce noise levels within the land uses surrounding schools to acceptable levels. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.g: Recreational Noise. The GPU proposes new or enhanced recreational uses that may generate noise conditions received off -site, as well as new residential and commercial development in proximity to existing and proposed recreational uses, which may in turn be affected by recreational noise. Such noise received from within recreational areas or generated by recreational areas has the potential to exceed relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards and to minimize recreational noise. Placement of new uses or increased intensity of existing uses that exceeds relevant noise standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Recreational Noise. Forprojects proposing new recreational uses or increased intensity of recreational activity in proximity to sensitive receptors, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the recreational use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines thatnoise standards maybe exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Forprojects proposing new residential uses in proximity to recreational areas, the Cityshall require the project applicant to demonstrate the recreational use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards maybe exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels from recreation use operations to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM ND. Page 27 _.__ I LC In C' because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts from recreation uses on sensitive land uses would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Existing standards include restrictions on the types of land uses that can be located in the vicinity of recreation uses and include measures that can be incorporated into the design of a project that would reduce noise levels within the land uses surrounding recreation facilities to acceptable levels. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.1: 3rd Street Annexation. The 3rd Street Annexation project proposes construction that may generate noise on a temporary basis in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code and the GPU. Excess of City noise standards would be considered a significant impact. The 3rd Street Annexation project proposes new development that may receive traffic noise levels in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). Excess of City noise standards would be considered a significant impact. The 3rd Street Annexation project has the potential to place new commercial uses in proximity to residential development, or vice versa, which may result in the reception of commercial noise in these residential areas in excess of relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). Excess of City noise standards would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): 3rd Street Annexation. The City shall require 3rd Street Annexation project applicants to demonstrate their compliance with City standards regarding construction noise. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the construction noise to acceptable levels. For3rd Streetprojects placing noise - sensitive land uses adjacentto orin the vicinityof1 -15, SR -74, Cambern Avenue, and Camino del Norte, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City standards regarding traffic noise received on the site. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. For 3rd Street Annexation projects proposing new commercial uses in the vicinity of sensitive receptors, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City noise standards. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITB?AOM8 I PACE GOF I oS The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to noise levels within the 3d Street Annexation area to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because compliance with City standards would ensure that potential impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. The City shall require 3rd Street Annexation project applicants to demonstrate their compliance with City standards regarding construction noise, noise sensitive land uses in proximity to 1 -15, and commercial operations. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the construction noise to acceptable levels. 6. AIR QUALITY a. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.a: Construction Impacts, Consistency with AQMP. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant short-term impacts associated with construction emissions and inconsistency with the AQMP. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate theiravoidance of significant impacts on air quality from construction activities through implementation of policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6. With implementation of these policies and goals, potential short -term impacts on air quality associated with construction of projects proposed in accordance with the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would be less than significant. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to construction air quality issues to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the policies of the General Plan in the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6 include requirements for construction equipment, restricting idling times, encouraging use of diesel vehicles, and dust suppression. b. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.b: Construction Impacts, Emissions within SCAQMD Thresholds. Implementation of individual projects anticipated in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant short-term impacts associated with construction emissions and inconsistency with SCAQMD thresholds. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 29 AGENDA ITEM NO._�__ Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation listed above for Impact 3.6.5. a. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed projectwhich mitigate oravoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to construction air quality issues to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the policies of the General Plan in the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6 include requirements for construction equipment, restricting idling times, encouraging use of diesel vehicles, and dust suppression. C. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.k: Operational Impacts, Stationary Emissions Sources. Development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in emissions on sensitive land uses that would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts on air quality associated with sensitive land use emissions through implementation of the following policies: The AQMP does not list specific measures to prevent air quality impacts on sensitive land uses. The following policies in the GPU mitigate the impacts on sensitive land uses: Public Safety and Welfare Air Quality Goal 1 will be addressed as part of future development projects. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to stationary emissions to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the policies of the GPU call for provision of adequate buffers from existing sources of emissions such as industrial facilities near sensitive receptors. In addition, the policies require that new developments (especially sensitive receptors) include air quality mitigation measures such as barriers, landscaping, ventilation systems, and pollution reduction measures. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 30 ACAGENDA ITEM n 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.a: Habitat Impacts. Significant impacts may result from future development implemented in accordance with the GPU. However, due to the lack of specific information on future projects, such as a grading plan, these impacts are not quantifiable at the programmatic level of analysis contained in this document. Specific mitigation will be required for future projects and the specifics of the mitigation will be determined on a project - by- project basis according to the terms of the MSHCP and the outcomes of consultation with the resource agencies. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Mitigation: Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on habitat through implementation of the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 1, Policies 1.1 -1.11, addressing the City's participation in the MSHCP, and set forth the City's intent to guide land use toward compatibility with long -term survival of biotic habitat. The GPU establishes City policies that encourage development while remaining sensitive to biological resources concerns. Adherence to the MSHCP and coordination with the resource agencies is required by the policies of the GPU. Project - specific analysis of habitat impacts completed in accordance with the MSHCP will be required to determine the significance of impacts and identify mitigation measures to minimize the impacts of future developments on vegetation communities to less-than- significant levels. Finding/ Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to habitat impacts to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts to habitat through implementation of the City's continued participation in the MSHCP, development of conservation and land use planning strategies that facilitate conservation of lands for MSHCP, and continued coordination with the RCA. The GPU requires that project - specific analysis be conducted to ensure development adheres to the MSHCP Guidelines, LEAPS program, and the Implementing Agreement. b. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.b: Plant and Wildlife Impacts. Future development proposed in accordance with the GPU may result in significant impacts with respect to species that cannot be quantified at this time. Project - specific analysis of plant and wildlife impacts will be required in order to determine the significance of impacts and identify mitigation measures that minimize potential impacts to less- than - significant levels. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM1 Nr�(Pag 31 PAGE 4.9 OF _l �� Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on plants and wildlife through implementation of the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 2 and its related policies that emphasize the necessity for project - specific analysis and identification of mitigation measures concerning sensitive plant and wildlife species. Project - specific analysis of plant and wildlife impacts completed in accordance with the MSHCP will be required to determine the significance of impacts and identify mitigation measures to minimize the impacts of future developments on plant and wildlife species to less - than - significant levels. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to plant and wildlife to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because goals and policies under the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter include measures to reduce impacts to habitat and emphasize the necessity for project - specific analysis and identification of mitigation measures concerning sensitive plant and wildlife species. Policies within the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter include the requirement of biological resources analyses of proposed projects, limitations on development in and /or modifications of areas containing riparian habitat of high functions and /or described for conservation. The policies also include the requirement for the City to pursue funding opportunities for native tree planting to support wildlife, improve air and water quality, and reduce energy consumption. C. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.c: Wetland Impacts. Development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan has the potential to result in significant wetland impacts. Individual environmental review conducted for future development projects must identify any impacts on wetlands and, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies, must ensure incorporation of adequate mitigation to preserve the viability of these important biological resources. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on wetlands through implementation of the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal Policy 2.2. Adherence to the relevant GPU policies and the Land Use Plan would prevent significant impacts on wetlands. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 32 AGENDA ITZ ?J NO._-�� Individual environmental review conducted forfuture developmentprojects will be required to identify any impacts on wetlands and, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies, must ensure incorporation of adequate mitigation to preserve the viability of these important biological resources. Findings /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to wetlands to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because goals and policy 2.2 under the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter include measures to reduce impacts to wetland habitat. Policy 2.2 within the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter includes limitations on development in and /or modification of areas containing riparian habitats of high function, discouragement of development in areas described for conservation, and drafting of a program that defines riparian /riverine habitat and standard avoidance criteria to that habitat. d. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.d: Conservation Areas. Implementation of individual projects in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant inconsistencies with the MSHCP. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Implementation of the GPU, the Preferred Land Use Plan, and District Plans could result in significant impacts related to disturbance of areas described for conservation in the MSHCP. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans in accordance with the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 1, Policies 1.1 -1.11 will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with areas described for conservation in the MSHCP Conservation Areas. Future projects maybe allowed to alter the Conservation Area boundaries through criteria refinement minor amendments, or other means, but would be required to do so in conformance with all regulations and mitigation requirements of the MSHCP. Findings /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to areas described for conservation in accordance with the MSHCP to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter contains measures designed to ensure that future development avoid significant impacts associated with areas described for Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 33 AGENDA iTENI MODE_C5A . O ins- conservation in the MSHCP Conservation Areas. Future development may need to incorporate measures such as open space conservation and /or restoration of areas to support conservation of important biological resources in accordance with the MSHCP. Policies within the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter may allow future projects to alter the Conservation Area boundaries through criteria refinement, minor amendments, or other means, but those projects would be required to do so in conformance with all regulations and mitigation requirements of the MSHCP. e. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.e: District Plans. Projects proposed within all of the District Plan areas have the potential to result in significant impacts on one or more of the issues identified above in Impacts 3.7.4a through 3.7.4d. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See Impacts 3.7.4.a, 3.7.4.b, 3.7.4.c, and 3.7.4.d. for mitigation measures for this impact. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the projects proposed within all of the District Plan areas to one or more of the issues identified above in Impacts 3.7.4a through 3.7.4d to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the District Plans because the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter contains measures to reduce impacts on habitats, sensitive plant and wildlife species, and wetlands. Policies within the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter include encouraging consistency with the goals of the MSHCP, individual project -level environmental review of future development projects, and incorporation of adequate mitigation in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies, to preserve the viability of important biological resources. Impact: Impact 3.7.4.f: 3rd Street Annexation. The 3rd Street Annexation area contains vegetation communities that are considered sensitive resources by CDFG. These resources may be affected as a result of development within the 3rd Street Annexation area. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts to biological resources through implementation of the following: Implementation of the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 2, Policies 2.1 and 2.2 will address the City's intent to guide land use toward compatibility with long -term survival of biotic habitat including riparian habitat. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM ".ge 3 pAn9 5a- nr 16 S Project - specific analysis of habitat impacts and impacts on special- status wildlife species completed in accordance with the MSHCP and the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 1, Policies 1.1 -1.11 will be required to determine the significance of impacts and identify mitigation measures to minimize the impacts to less - than - significant levels. Findings /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the projects proposed within the 3rd Street Annexation area to vegetation communities that are considered sensitive resources by CDFG to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future 3rd Street Annexation projects because the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter contains measures to reduce impacts to habitats, sensitive plant and wildlife species, and wetlands. Policies within the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter include consistency with the goals of the MSHCP, individual project -level environmental review to demonstrate reduction in impacts to sensitive biological resources, and incorporation of adequate mitigation in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies, to preserve the viability of important biological resources. 8. HYDROLOGYIWATER QUALITY a. Impact: Impact 3.8.4.a: Increased development throughout the City and SOI would potentially result in significant alteration of the drainage patterns by altering or extending grading within any of these streams. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The following goals and policies of the GPU must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts associated with 1) alteration of drainage patterns and associated erosion; 2) development within the 100 yearfloodplain; and 3) water quality. Hazard Policies 6.1 -6.8 Water Resources Policies 4.1 -4.6 and 5.1 -5.8 Open Space Policy 3.5 Biology Policies 1.1 -1.11 and 2.1 -2.2 Findings /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure(s) listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to alteration of draining patterns, development within the floodplain, and Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM ND. Page 35 PAGE 5 - OF r o S water quality to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because goals and policies under the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter include measures to reduce impacts to drainage patterns. Policies within the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter are intended to ensure that future development conforms with applicable provisions of the National Flood Insurance program, encourage use of buffers between development and floodways, encourage preservation and improvement of water quality and drainage patterns by encouraging preservation of watercourses and wetlands, and require future projects to conform with federal and state water quality improvement requirements related to the NPDES and RWQCB TMDL requirements. b. Impact: Impact 3.8.4.b: Development within the 100 -year floodplain would be subject to significant flooding impacts. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.8.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU to development within the floodplain to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because goals and policies under the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter contain measures to reduce impacts associated with development in the 100- yearfloodplain. Policies within the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter are intended to ensure that future development conforms with applicable provisions of the National Flood Insurance program encourage use of buffers between development and floodways, and describe appropriate uses within floodplains. C. Impact: Impact 3.8.4.c: Development consistent with the GPU and regional growth could result in increased non -point source and point source contamination from common urban sources, construction activity, and vehicle use. This pollution could have a potentially significant impact on surface and groundwater quality. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.8.4.a Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO Page 36 Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU from non -point source and point source contamination from common urban sources, construction activity, and vehicle use to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans because goals and policies under the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chaptercontains measures to reduce impacts on surface and groundwater quality. Policies within the GPU Resource Protection and Preservation chapter are intended to ensure that future development encourage preservation and improvement of water quality and drainage patterns by encouraging preservation of watercourses and wetlands, and to require future projects to conform with federal and state water quality improvement requirements related to the NPDES and RWQCB TMDL requirements. d. Impact: Impact 3.8.4.d: Considering the City currently contains vacant land; it is likely that significant changes in existing recharge systems or pathways of contamination would occur from development in accordance with the GPU. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.8.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate oravoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU within the District Plans and 3rd Street Annexation area related to contamination of watercourses to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies of the GPU must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts to water recharge systems. These goals and policies are intended to ensure that future development conform to applicable provisions of the National Flood Insurance program and encourage use of buffers between development and floodways. The goals and policies encourage preservation and improvement of water quality and drainage patterns by encouraging preservation of watercourses, wetlands as well as requiring future projects to conform to federal and state water quality improvement requirements related to the NPDES and RWQCB TMDL requirements. in accordance with the GPU, future developments must also implement BMP's in an effective way that reduces the amount of pollutants entering waterways. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO, Page 37 j PAGE__!a57 of 1 U S e. Impact: Impact 3.8.4.e: Development consistent with the GPU could result in altered drainage patterns, significantly increasing the potential for erosion throughout the City, especially where hillsides are developed with residential uses. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): See mitigation for Impact 3.8.4.a Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU within the District Plans and 3rd Street Annexation area related to contamination of watercourses to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies of the GPU must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts associated with 1) alteration of drainage patterns and associated erosion; 2) development within the 100 year floodplain; and 3) water quality. These goals and policies encourage use of buffers between development and floodways and also describe appropriate uses within floodplains. The goals and policies encourage preservation and improvement of water quality and drainage patterns by encouraging preservation of watercourses, wetlands as well as requiring future projects to conform to federal and state water quality improvement requirements related to the NPDES and RWQCB TMDL requirements. Implementation of these policies would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. In accordance with the GPU, future developments must also implement BMP's during construction in an effective way that reduces the extent of erosion of material from construction sites. 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.a: Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste Impacts. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use could expose people to significant hazards from use of hazardous materials and the disposal of hazardous waste. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goal 4 and its associated policies under the Hazards/Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to keep all hazardous materials generators within the City and SOI in compliance with regulations and continue to avoid any public health and safety impacts. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with use and storage of Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO I Page 38 . A^r <-c, nr 1() S hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous waste through implementation of Policies 4.1 -4.4 of the Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards and hazardous materials to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 4 and its associated policies under the Hazards /Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to keep all hazardous materials generators within the City and SOI in compliance with regulations and continue to avoid any public health and safety impacts. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with use and storage of hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous waste through implementation of Policies 4.1 -4.4 of the Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. These policies require continuation of household hazardous waste collection and education programs. Policies also require that waste reduction programs be implemented by waste generators and that routine inspections are conducted on storage and handling practices of waste generators. Hazardous waste generators must also be in compliance with the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. b. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.b: Wildfire Hazard Impacts. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use could expose people to significant hazards from wildfires. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goal 5 and its associated policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent and-be sufficiently prepared for wildfire occurrences in the City and SOL Therefore, although development would spread into wildfire risk zones, the proper precautions set forth in the GPU would allowimpacts to be reduced to less - than — significant levels. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to wildfire hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ' Page 39 AGENDA 17EM NO reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 5 and its associated policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent and be sufficiently prepared for wildfire occurrences in the City and SOL Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. The policies in this chapter require brush clearance, use of low fuel landscaping and fuel modification zones, fire resistant building techniques, emergency water supply procedures and automatic gas- shutoff earthquake sensors. C. impact: Impact 3.9.5.c: Every district in the City and SOI, except for North Peak, contains sites that currently use or dispose of hazardous materials and waste. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the District Plans will be required to demonstrate theiravoidance of significant impacts associated with exposure to hazardous materials through implementation of Policy 4.5 of the Hazards/Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Proposed development projects on or adjacent to the SARI line in these districts would be required to analyze risks specific to sensitive land uses and the extent of the subsurface components involved with building in these locations. With implementation of these measures, impacts would be considered to be less than significant. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the District Plans and GPU related to hazards and hazardous materials to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal and its associated policies under the Hazards /Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to keep all hazardous materials generators within the City and SOI in compliance with regulations and continue to avoid any public health and safety impacts. These policies also require continuation of household hazardous waste collection and education programs. Policies also require that waste reduction programs be implemented by waste generators and that routine inspections are conducted on storage and handling practices of waste generators. Hazardous waste generators must also be in compliance with the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Proposed development projects on or adjacent to the SARI line within District Plans would be required to analyze risks specific to sensitive land uses and the extent of subsurface components associated with building in these locations. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 40 PACE_.5-�—OF—LQ-5— Impact: Impact 3.9.5.d: Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use within the District Plans could expose people to significant hazards from wildfires. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within each District Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the District Plans and GPU related to wildfire hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 5 and its associated policies underthe Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent and be sufficiently prepared for wildfire occurrences in the City and SOL Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. The policies in this chapter require brush clearance, use of low fuel landscaping and fuel modification zones, fire resistant building techniques, emergency water supply procedures and automatic gas- shutoff earthquake sensors. e. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.e: Sites with permits from the state to handle hazardous materials or waste exist within the 3rd Street Annexation area. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with use and storage of hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous waste through implementation of Policies 4.1 -4.4 of the Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts associated with development in the 3rd Street related to hazards and hazardous materials to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. Page 41 mare �9 n 10 S because Goal 4 and its associated policies under the Hazards /Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to keep all hazardous materials generators within the City and SOI in compliance with regulations and continue to avoid any public health and safety impacts. These policies also require continuation of household hazardous waste collection and education programs. Policies also require that waste reduction programs be implemented by waste generators and that routine inspections are conducted on storage and handling practices of waste generators. Hazardous waste generators must also be in compliance with the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.f: Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use within the 3rd Street Annexation could expose people to significant hazards from wildfires. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed projectwhich mitigate oravoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of development within the 3rd Street Annexation area related to wildfire hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 5 and its associated policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent and be sufficiently prepared for wildfire occurrences in the City and SOL Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. The policies in this chapter require brush clearance, use of low fuel landscaping and fuel modification zones, fire resistant building techniques, emergency water supply procedures and automatic gas - shutoff earthquake sensors. g. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.g: Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use could contribute to exposure of people to significant hazards from use of hazardous materials and the disposal of hazardous waste within the City, SOI and within the region. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Vake Elsinore ACENDA ITEM NO. I 'P^aget42 PAGE�Cr__1_" Goals and policies within the Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter include measures to ensure effective hazardous materials management that would reduce the City of Lake Elsinore's cumulative effect on the County and regions hazardous waste generation, treatment, and storage. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with use and storage of hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous waste through implementation of Policies 4.1 -4.4 of the Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. With implementation of these policies at a project specific level the contribution of buildout of the City and SOI to cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate oravoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials within the City and SOI to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 4 and its associated policies under the Hazards /Hazardous Materials section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to keep all hazardous materials generators within the City and SOI in compliance with regulations and continue to avoid any public health and safety impacts. These policies also require continuation of household hazardous waste collection and education programs. Policies also require that waste reduction programs be implemented by waste generators and that routine inspections are conducted on storage and handling practices of waste generators. Hazardous waste generators must also be in compliance with the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Proposed development projects on or adjacent to the SARI line within the City and SOI would be required to analyze risks specific to sensitive land uses and the extent of subsurface components associated with building in these locations. Impact: Impact 3.9.5.h: Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would contribute to cumulative exposure of people to significant hazards from wildfires. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. With implementation of policies required by the GPU, cumulative impacts related to wildfire hazards associated with development would be considered to be less than significant. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 43 AGENDA ITEM, ND. n 105- Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of development within the City and SOI related to wildfire hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goal 5 and its associated policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent and be sufficiently prepared forwildfire occurrences in the City and SOL Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with wildfire hazards through implementation of all policies under the Wildfire Hazards section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. The policies in this chapter require brush clearance, use of low fuel landscaping and fuel modification zones, fire resistant building techniques, emergency water supply procedures and automatic gas- shutoff earthquake sensors. 10. GEOLOGY /SOILS a. Impact: Impact 3.10.4.a: Seismic Hazards. Like all of Southern California, the City and SOI will continue to be subject to ground shaking resulting from activity on regional faults. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would increase the potential for property loss, injury, or death resulting from this ground- shaking hazard. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from ground shaking and liquefaction. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate theiravoidance of significant impacts associated with seismic hazards through implementation of all goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards from seismic activity to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from ground shaking and liquefaction. The Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA IT-04 M01--L—Rage." GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards associated with seismic activity in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code. Policies within the GPU Public Safety and Welfare Chapter Seismic Activity Section intended to address potential impacts include encouraging seismic upgrades of buildings, and use of site specific remediation to address hazards related to impacts from seismic activity. b. Impact: Impact 3.10.4.b: Expansive /Corrosive Soils. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would increase the potential for significant exposure of people or property to the risk of property loss, injury, or death resulting from expansive and corrosive soils hazards. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from expansive and corrosive soils. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with expansive or corrosive soils through implementation of the policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards from soils to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies within the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapterof the GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards associated with expansion and settlementof soils in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code. The policy states that the City may require use of site specific remediation to address hazards related to impacts from expansive and /or settlement of soils. In addition the policies encourage programs to assist in seismic upgrading of existing buildings. C. Impact: Impact3.10.4.c: Landslides. Increased development throughout the City andSO1 in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would increase the potential for exposure of people or property to significant risk of property loss, injury, or death resulting from slope failure hazards. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 45 AGE�IDAET h'2 � I /7 C Goals and policies under the Land Use section of the Community Form chapter and Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from slope failure. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the following GPU policies will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with landslides through implementation of all goals and policies under the Land Use section of the Community Form chapter and Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards from landslides to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies under the Land Use section of the Community Form chapter and the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from landslides. The Land Use Section of the Community Form Chapter requires consideration of environmental and geologic features in the planning process and establishment of hillside grading standards. The Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards associated with landslides in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code and that the City may require site specific remediation measures if necessary. d. Impact: Impact3.10.4.d: Subsidence. Increased development throughout the City andSO1 in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would increase the potential for exposure of people or property to the risk of property loss, injury, or death resulting from subsidence hazards. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from subsidence. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with subsidence through implementation of all goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM ND. Pa e mom _CO OF--ID—S The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards from subsidence to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies within the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards associated with subsidence in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code. The policy states that the City may require use of site specific remediation to address hazards related to impacts from expansive and /or settlement of soils. In addition the policies encourage programs to assist in seismic upgrading of existing buildings. e. Impact: Impact 3.10.4.f. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would cause impacts related to potential hazards involving exposure of people or property to the risk of loss, injury, or death. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from Geologic Resources. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant ata programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with geologic resources through implementation of all policies to preventloss, injury, ordeath from subsidence under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to geotechnical hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies under the Land Use section of the Community Form chapter and the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from geotechnical hazards. The Land Use Section of the Community Form Chapter requires consideration of environmental and geologic features in the planning process and establishment of hillside grading standards. The Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code and that the City may require site specific remediation measures if necessary. Impact: Impact 3.10.4.g: District Plans. Increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would result in potential hazards involving exposure of people or property to the risk of loss, injury, or death resulting from seismic hazards, landslides, or geologic resource activities. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the district plans in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with geotechnical resources through implementation of all goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to hazards to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies under the Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter of the GPU include measures to prevent loss, injury, or death from geotechnical hazards. The Seismic Activity section of the Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU require that projects identify potential geotechnical hazards associated with seismic activity in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Code. Policies within the GPU Public Safety and Welfare Chapter Seismic Activity Section to address potential impacts include encouraging seismic upgrades of buildings, and use of site specific remediation to address hazards related to impacts related to geotechnical hazards. 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES a. Impact: Impact 3.12.5.a: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Facilities. Population increase associated with increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would potentially result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the construction of new or physically altered governmental facilities or increased use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts associated with community services related to parks and recreation. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies underthe Parks and Recreation section and the Land Use section of the Community Form chapter of the GPU include measures to reduce impacts on parks, recreation, and open space. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts associated with community services related to 1) parks and recreation, 2) police service, 3) fire protection, 4) schools, 5) libraries, Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM No. Page 48 � PAGE p G Or° 10 C 6) water, 7) wastewater and sewer, 8) solid waste disposal, and 9) miscellaneous services through implementation of the following: Policies under Goals 23 and 24 of the Parks and Recreation section of the Community Form chapter, Policies 1.1 and 2.1 of the Community Form chapter, Land Use section, Policies 22.1 through 22.7 under Goal 22 of the Fire and Police/LawEnforcement and Public Infrastructure and Services headings of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter, and Goals 15 through 20 and associated policies of the Public Infrastructure and Services heading section of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter addressing schools, libraries, water and wastewater service, solid waste disposal, and other miscellaneous services. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to parks and recreation services to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because the goals and policies of the GPU require that applicants for future projects coordinate with the responsible agencies to ensure that future projects would provide adequate facilities and would not adversely affect the ability of the agency to meet existing or future demand. b. Im act: Impacts 3.12.5.b —h: Police, Fire, School, Libraries, Water, Wastewater, Sewer, and Solid Waste. Potential impacts would result from population increase and increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan. These potential substantial adverse physical impacts include the construction of new or physically altered governmental facilities. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts associated with community services related to police, fire, school, library, water, wastewater, sewer, and solid waste services. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Fire and Police/LawEnforcement and Public Infrastructure and Services headings of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter of the GPU include measures to reduce impacts on police services. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Mitigation Measure for Impact 3.12.5.a above also applies. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITE4i NO. I Page 49 PAGE (D% or 10 5 Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to police, fire, school, library, water, wastewater, sewer and solid waste services to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because goals and policies under the Fire and Police /Law Enforcement and Public Infrastructure and Services headings of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter of the GPU include measures to reduce impacts on police services. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts to policies services through implementation of these goals and policies. C. Impact: Impact 3.12.5.1: Potential impacts from population increase and increased development throughout the City and SOI in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan and potential substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives for animal control, electrical and natural gas service, and telecommunications services would be significant. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan could result in significant impacts associated with community services related to animal control, natural gas, and telecommunication services. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Goals and policies under the Public Infrastructure and Services heading of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter of the GPU include measures to reduce impacts on animal control, electrical and natural gas service, and telecommunications services. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant at a programmatic level. Mitigation Measure for Impact 3.12.5.a above also applies. Finding /Facts in Support, of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan and GPU related to animal control, electrical and natural gas service, and telecommunications services to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because Goals and policies under the Public Infrastructure and Services heading of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter of the GPU include measures to reduce impacts on animal control, electrical and natural gas service, and telecommunications services. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate their Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA E I I M NO. l Page 5o PAM (D �) OF t 0 S avoidance of significant impacts to these services through implementation of these goals and policies. d. Impact: Impact 3.12.5.k: 3rd Street Annexation. The annexation of the 3rd Street area would potentially result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision and construction of new or physically altered governmental facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for community services and facilities. Mitigation: The impact will be mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The following goals and policies of the Preferred Land Use Plan must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts associated with community services related to district plans: Policies under Goals 23 and 24 of the Parks and Recreation section of the Community Form chapter, Policies 1.1 and 2.1 of the Community Form chapter, Land Use section, Policies 22.1 through 22.7 under Goal 22 of the Fire and Police /Law Enforcement and Public Infrastructure and Services headings of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter, and Goals 15 through 20 and associated policies of the Public Infrastructure and Services section of the Community Facilities and Services section of the Community Form chapter addressing schools, libraries, water and waste water service, solid waste disposal, and other miscellaneous services. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The mitigation measure listed above would reduce potential impacts to public services associated with implementation of projects within the 3rtl Street Annexation to less than significant. The mitigation would reduce the impacts associated with future projects because, the goals and policies of the GPU require that applicants for future projects coordinate with the responsible agencies to ensure that future projects would provide adequate facilities and would not adversely affect the ability of the agency to meet existing or future demand. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. I Page 51 PAGE (09 OF 1(),S- FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS NOT FULLY MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds cannot be fully mitigated to a level of less than significant, despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and set forth herein, are described in this section. The applicable environmental issue areas include Land Use, Air Quality and Noise. 1. LAND USE a. Impact: Impact 3.1.4d: As discussed in Table 3.1-4, the projected population with buildout of the Preferred Land Use Plan is 205,070. The buildout for the proposed GPU within incorporated land only is projected to be 116,471. SCAG has projected the population to be 71,737 based on the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan within incorporated areas of the city only. Based on recent conversations with SCAG (2007), their forecast will increase to approximately 95,000 with the next Regional Transportation Plan. The variance of 21,471, or roughly 20 %, between the Preferred Land Use Plan and the SCAG forecast is considered to be in substantial conformance with the SCAG population forecasts with the understanding that the greater population figure correlates to additional housing opportunities to provide affordable housing, and the GPU contains policies that require a job- housing balance. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): The Growth Management Program developed by the City provides a strategy for developing a pattern and rate of growth to ensure that adequate public facilities and infrastructure can be provided to meet the rate of new construction and population growth. The goals and policies under the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter provide principles for a growth management section. Implementation of the development pattern provided in the Growth Management Program and implementation of Policies 12.1 -12.5 and 13.1- 13.4.from the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter, in association with future development would reduce impacts related to the population and housing forecasts. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The GPU includes goals and policies that, in combination with a growth management strategic plan, will reduce increased development and density impacts. A planned population projection that exceeds another agency projection is not necessarily itself an environmental impact. However, implementation of the growth management plan would reduce impacts related to the inconsistency of the GPU with the population and housing forecasts of SCAG, although impacts will not be reduced to below a level of significance. However, as discussed in subsequent chapters of the EIR, certain direct and cumulative impacts of the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA I T ErA P ti.TTT�,o; ge 52 PAGE 70 b. Impact: Impact 3.1.4f: Goals and policies for land use under each District Plan provide for land use compatibility; adequacy of community services, recreation, and open space; and circulation standards. As a result, overall impacts related to land use compatibility associated with implementation of the District Plans will be less than significant with the exception of the East Lake District Plan. As described in Table 3.1 -5, the potential impacts resulting from incompatibility of land uses within the District Plan areas may be significant in the East Lake District Plan area. Potential incompatibility issues are related to the airport use area and adjacent recreational (motocross use) and residential areas. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Within the traffic pattern zone, the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook recommends no more than 3 du /acre and exclusion of areas that attract large assemblages of people to minimize hazards including fuel spills. Low - medium residential areas (1 -6 du /acre) currently exist and are designated in the Preferred Land Use Plan adjacent to the airport use area. The potential inconsistencies of future development with the densities allowed for in the Land Use Planning Handbook are considered to be a significant land use compatibility impact ate programmatic level. However, each project will be reviewed for its consistency with the Land Use Planning Handbook Recommendations when individual projects are proposed. This review will include analysis and subsequent review under CEQA. The feasibility of the proposed mitigation measures must be determined on a project - specific level, and, therefore, land use compatibility impacts may be significant and unavoidable. Considering thatthe EastLake District Plan allows forthe potentiallocation ofhigherdensity housing adjacent to the relocated airport, these significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR would also apply to the proposed District. If the motocross track is relocated adjacent to the new location for the airport, future development within the East Lake District Plan shall be required to conform with mitigation measures identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR. These measures are summarized in Table 3.1 -5 of this EIR. However, additional project - specific CEQA environmental analysis and review will be required when a detailed project is proposed at-the new motocross site. The subsequent project -level review will include an analysis of potential land use compatibility issues with locating the motocross site in proximity to the airport. As discussed in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR, the feasibility of the proposed mitigation measures must be determined on a project specific level and therefore land use compatibility impacts may be significant and unavoidable. Considering that the East Lake District Plan allows for the potential re location of the motocross facility, these significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR would also apply to the proposed District Plan. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The potential inconsistencies of future development with the densities allowed for in the Land Use Planning Handbook within the Airport Land Use Planning handbook within the Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEAA NU. Page 53 PALL _OF__Lo I�T Eastlake District Plan Area are considered to be a significant land use compatibility impact at a programmatic level. However, each project will be reviewed for its consistency with the Land Use Planning Handbook Recommendations when individual projects are proposed. This review will include analysis and subsequent review under CEQA. The feasibility of the proposed mitigation measures must be determined on a project - specific level, and, therefore, land use compatibility impacts may be significant and unavoidable. Considering that the East Lake District Plan allows for the potential location of higher density housing adjacent to the relocated airport, these significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR would also apply to the proposed District. If the motocross track is relocated adjacent to the new location for the airport, future development within the East Lake District Plan shall be required to conform with mitigation measures identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR. However, additional project - specific CEQA environmental analysis and review will be required when a detailed project is proposed at the new motocross site. The subsequent project -level review will include an analysis of potential land use compatibility issues with locating the motocross site in proximity to the airport. As discussed in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR, the feasibility of the proposed mitigation measures must be determined on a project specific level and therefore land use compatibility impacts may be significant and unavoidable. Considering that the East Lake District Plan allows for the potential relocation of the motocross facility, these significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the East Lake Specific Plan EIR would also apply to the proposed District Plan. c. Impact: Impact 3.1.4h: Cumulative Impacts. The increase in population allowed underthe GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on community services and facilities, transportation, air quality, noise, biological resources, water resources, housing, and aesthetics in the region. However, with the implementation of the Growth Management Plan as proposed in the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter, these impacts would be reduced. A detailed discussion of the impacts of the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan impacts related to these issues is provided in subsequent chapters of the EIR. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Cumulative Impacts. The growth management program developed by the City provides a strategy for developing a pattern and rate of growth to ensure that adequate public facilities and infrastructure can be provided to meet the rate of new construction and population growth. The goals and policies under the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter provide principles for a growth management strategic plan that would reduce cumulative impacts of proposed population growth under the Preferred Land Use Plan. However, as discussed in subsequent chapters certain impacts of the GPU related to air quality and noise cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance. Therefore, the contribution of the GPU to cumulative impacts cannot be reduced to below a level of significance. Assuming each project complies with MSHCP, there will be no cumulative impacts. Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate avoidance of significant impacts through implementation ofrelevantgoals and Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEMS FAO. q PAGE ?2-- OF policies of the Resource Protection and Preservation chapters of the GPU. The GPU goals and policies are consistent with the guidelines set by the MSCHP. Therefore, with implementation of these policies individual development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan would be consistent with the local habitat conservation planning efforts. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The goals and policies under the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter provide principles for a growth management strategic plan that would reduce cumulative impacts of proposed population growth under the Preferred Land Use Plan. However, as discussed in subsequent chapters certain impacts of the GPU related to air quality and noise cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance. Therefore, the contribution of the GPU to cumulative impacts cannot be reduced to below a level of significance. 2. NOISE a. Impact: Impact 3.5.5b: Traffic Noise. An increase in traffic volume throughout the local and regional circulation system as a result of GPU implementation has the potential to generate noise levels along roadway corridors that would exceed standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). The corridors of 1 -15, SR -74, and Railroad Canyon Road are particularly sensitive to additional traffic noise due to the substantial noise levels currently generated along these routes. At 2030 traffic levels associated with buildout of the GPU, the ADT on the freeways and roadways would increase. As shown by comparing 3.5 -2 and 3.5 -3 of the DEIR, the increase in traffic at GPU buildout would extend the 70, 65, and 60 Ldn contours beyond existing conditions. As shown in Table 3.5 -3, residential uses are generally incompatible within the 65 Ldn contour. Considering that the 65 Ldn contourwould extend beyond existing conditions, additional existing and planned residential areas in proximity to major public roadways could be subject to exterior noise levels thai exceed City standards. As a result, traffic levels at buildout of the GPU could result in significant noise impacts on existing land uses. Developments implemented in accordance with the GPU have the potential to place new receptors in areas that would receive traffic noise (both existing and future) exceeding standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards and to reduce traffic- related noise. Placement of new uses in areas subject to excessive traffic noise would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITIEVAI NO. Page 55 n®re % �:Z n= I r7 .'q' Traffic Noise. In accordance with the policies of the GPU and the Zoning Code, the City shall require the applicant for any future development to analyze impacts of the increased traffic volume on noise conditions along affected roadways. Where project - specific analysis concludes that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the traffic noise to acceptable levels. For projects placing noise- sensitive land uses adjacent to or in the vicinity of a major roadway, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City standards regarding traffic noise received on the site. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed or traffic levels will increase substantially like that anticipated for / -15, SR -74, Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, Lakeshore Drive, and Lake Street there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects, resulting in significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The GPU and Preferred Land Use plan anticipate that uses may be located in the vicinity of public roadways. For projects placing noise - sensitive land uses adjacent to or in the vicinity of a major roadway, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City standards regarding traffic noise received on the site. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures thatwill reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed or traffic levels will increase substantially like that anticipated for 1 -15, SR -74, Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, Lakeshore Drive, and Lake Street there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects, resulting in significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. b. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.h: District Plans. Noise impacts resulting from the District Plans would be considered less than significant if the policies set forth in the District Plans are incorporated into future development projects within the District Plan area. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed or traffic levels will increase substantially, such as that anticipated for 1 -15, Riverside Drive, and Grand Avenue, there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects within a District Plan, leading to identification of significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): District Plans. No specific mitigation measures are required forimplementation of the District Plans. As discussed above, however, individual projects proposed throughout the planning area may require mitigation to reduce noise impacts to less - than - significant levels, as would be determined by project - specific analysis. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore I Page 56 AGENDA ITEM NO. f PAGE —7 .. OF L O 5 Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan and the District Plans anticipate placement of uses in the vicinity of roadways. For projects placing noise - sensitive land uses adjacent to or in the vicinity of a major roadway, the City shall require the project applicant to demonstrate the new use's compliance with City standards regarding traffic noise received on the site. Where project - specific analysis determines that noise standards may be exceeded, then the City shall require binding mitigation measures that will reduce the noise received to acceptable levels. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed or traffic levels will increase substantially like that anticipated for I- 15, SR -74, Riverside Drive, Grand Avenue, Lakeshore Drive, and Lake Street there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects, resulting in significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. 3. AIR QUALITY a. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.c: Construction Impacts. Emissions of Non - Attainment Pollutants Construction - related emission of the SCAB's non - attainment pollutants (03, CO, and particulate matter) would be significant. This impact is significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate theiravoidance of significant impacts on airqualityfrom construction activities through implementation of policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, Goal 2, Policies 2.9 -2.6. Applicants shall comply with Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) control measures. AQMP control measures described above would reduce emissions, but no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. Pollutants of particular concern in the Lake Elsinore area are 03, CO, and particulate matter. A comparison of recent air quality monitoring data collected from the local monitoring stations to the state and federal standards for criteria pollutants is provided in Table 3.6 -3 of the DEIR. The high concentration of stationary sources of air contaminants in the western portion of the SCAB and mobile sources throughout the SCAB contribute to generally poor air quality in the region. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ACEPr DA ITEW NO. I Page 57 DACE .-1 S or. 10 S Construction projects associated with GPU implementation would also emit 03, CO, and particulate matter, for which the SCAB is a nonattainment area. Excessive emissions of these pollutants would be considered a significant impact. Implementation of the policies set forth in the GPU would reduce construction and operational emissions impacts associated with future development in the City; however, considering that the region is in federal and state nonattainment status for certain criteria pollutants, such policies do not ensure that future development and associated emissions will not continue to contribute to regional nonattainment status for these pollutants. As a result, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. b. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.d: Operational Impacts, Consistency with AQMP. The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflicts with the AQMP by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter,Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. Control measures in the AQMP include: promotion of lighter colorroofing and road materials, requiring clean fuels, supporting alternative fuels, and reducing petroleum dependency, pursuit of long -term advanced technologies measures, process modifications and improvements, best management practices, and market incentives. However, no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The high concentration of stationary sources of air contaminants in the western portion of the SCAB and mobile sources throughout the SCAB contribute to generally poor air quality in the region. The 2003 AQMP established a program to reduce the SCAB's emissions based on 2001 SCAG population projections. As discussed in Section 3.1 and Section 3.11 of this EIR, the GPU would accommodate a population increase that surpasses current SCAG projections. The GPU would obstruct implementation of the AQMP by not contributing to its goals of regional reductions of air pollutant emissions in the region, and it would conflict with the AQMP in its inconsistency with AQMP projections for pollutant emissions; this obstruction and conflict are a significant air quality impact that cannot be mitigated through implementation of the air quality— related measures set forth in the GPU. Control measures in the AQMP include: promotion of lighter color roofing and road materials; requiring clean fuels, supporting alternative fuels, and reducing petroleum Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITieM NO. tt a�-- a 58 PAGE�®F dependency; pursuit of long -term advanced technologies measures; process modifications and improvements; best management practices; and market incentives. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections utilized in preparation of the AQMP and Riverside County is currently a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. C. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.e: Operational Impacts, Emissions within SCAQMD Thresholds. The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflict with the SCAQMD Thresholds by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed underthe Public Safetyand Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. AQMP control measures listed above for Impact 3.6.5.c would reduce emissions, but no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The high concentration of stationary sources of air contaminants in the western portion of the SCAB and mobile sources throughout the SCAB contribute to generally poor air quality in the region. Control measures in the AQMP include: promotion of lighter color roofing and road materials; requiring clean fuels, supporting alternative fuels, and reducing petroleum dependency; pursuit of long -term advanced technologies measures; process modifications and improvements; best management practices; and market incentives. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections used in preparation of the AQMP and Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less -than- significant level. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.f: Operational Impacts, Carbon Monoxide Emissions. Although new technology and stringent regulations have decreased CO concentrations in the region, the growth inducement allowed under the GPU would cause an increase in CO emitters and emissions in the City would increase and contribute to cumulative CO concentration Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITIM, I NO. I Page 59 PAGE -7 OF t 0 S increases. Therefore, while the policies under the GPU alleviate CO emissions, the increased growth would cause impacts on air quality that are significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. The AQMP states that by 2010, annual average CO emission reductions should total 445 tons per day. Control measures in the AQMP include: truck stop electrification; natural gas fuel specifications, emission reductions from in -use off -road vehicles and equipment, expansion of carpool lanes, rail track, express busways, park & ride lots, bus stations, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities; require clean fuels, support alternative fuels, and reduce petroleum dependency; pursue long -term advanced technology measures, economic incentive programs, and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. These measures would reduce emissions, but no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The AQMP states that by 2010, annual average CO emission reductions should total 445 tons per day. Control measures in the AQMP include: truck stop electrification; natural gas fuel specifications; emission reductions from in -use off -road vehicles and equipment; expansion of carpool lanes, rail track, express busways, park & ride lots, bus stations, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities; require clean fuels, support alternative fuels, and reduce petroleum dependency; pursue long -term advanced technology measures; economic incentive programs; and mitigation fee programs forfederal sources. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections used in-preparation of the AQMP and Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available thatwould make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. e. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.g: Operational Impacts, Ozone Emissions. Although aggressive emission control programs in the SCAB and enhanced vehicle emissions technology have decreased 03 concentrations in recent years, the amount of new development under the GPU still would contribute to local and regional 03 concentration increases. Therefore, the existing and cumulative impacts would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO.�1 ?age so PAG€OF (0 5 Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Control measures in the AQMP for CO emissions may apply to 03 and include: truck stop electrification, natural gas fuel specifications, emission reductions from in -use off -road vehicles and equipment, expansion ofcarpoollanes, rail track, express busways, park & ride lots, bus stations, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, require clean fuels, support altemative fuels, and reduce petroleum dependency, pursue long -term advanced technology measures, economic incentive programs, and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. Even though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Findinq /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. Control measures in the AQMP for CO emissions may apply to 03 and include: truck stop electrification; natural gas fuel specifications; emission reductions from in -use off -road vehicles and equipment; expansion of carpool lanes, rail track, express busways, park & ride lots, bus stations, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities; require clean fuels, support alternative fuels, and reduce petroleum dependency; pursue long -term advanced technology measures; economic incentive programs; and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections used to prepare AQMP and Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less -than- significant level. f. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.h: Operational Impacts, Particulate Matter Emissions Development allowed under the GPU would increase construction activities and vehicle trips that contribute to particulate matter emissions in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of policies listed under Public Safety and Welfare Air Quality Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6 and through implementation of goals and policies listed underthe Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1— Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA aEm No. ' Page 61 PAGE. 1 J _OF . LO S 3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. The AQMP states that by 2010, annual average PM10 emission reductions should total 3 tons per day. Control measures in the AQMP include: emission reductions from petroleum restaurant operations, fugitive dust sources, wood - burning fireplaces and stoves, in -use off - road vehicles and equipment, road dust suppression; watering or revegetation of disturbed surface areas, chemical stabilization of unpaved areas; track -out prevention; reduced vehicular speeds on unpaved roads, economic incentive programs; and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. Even though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. Control measures in the AQMP that address particulate matter include: emission reductions from petroleum restaurant operations, fugitive dust sources, wood - burning fireplaces and stoves, in -use off -road vehicles and equipment; road dust suppression; watering or revegetation of disturbed surface areas; chemical stabilization of unpaved areas; track -out prevention; reduced vehicular speeds on unpaved roads; economic incentive programs; and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections used to prepare the AQMD and Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. g. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational Impacts, Other Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of criteria pollutants in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. The AQMP states that by 2010, annual average NO„ emission reductions should total 223 tons per day. Control measures for NO„ emissions in the AQMP include: truck stop electrification; natural gas fuel specifications, emission reductions from in -use off-road vehicles and equipment, expansion of carpool lanes, rail track, express busways, park & ride lots, bus stations, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities; require clean fuels, support alternative fuels, and reduce petroleum dependency, • pursue long -term advanced technology Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. ( Page 62 PAGE �- �1 - - ®F --- t O S though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. Control measures in the AQMP include: emission reductions from architectural coatings and cleanup solvents, industrial process operations, fugitive emission sources, composting, in- use off -road vehicles and equipment; and emission charges of $5,000 per ton of VOC for stationary sources emitting more than 10 tons per year. The policies would reduce the impact of implementation of the GPU in association with the future development process. However, the regional and cumulative impacts on TAG and VOC concentrations related to conflicts or obstruction of the applicable air quality plan and violation of air quality standards set forth by the SCAQMD AQMP would be considered significant. As a result, even though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational Impacts, Greenhouse Gas Emissions The impact scale for climate change is global, and the amount of GHG emissions necessary to effect radiative forcing (e.g., global warming) is on a global scale. Population growth is anticipated to occur with the proposed project, and is expected to result in increased emissions of GHGs, largely due to increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT), as well as increased energy consumption. The CO2 emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan shown in Tables 3.6 -10 and 3.6 -11 would contribute to global warming and potential adverse global environmental effects. Increased GHG emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan could also potentially conflict with the requirement of AB 32 to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. As a result, the GHG emissions from implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan would contribute to a potentially significant impact related to global warming. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): In accordance with Chapter 3: Public Safety and Welfare Policy 1.1 the City shall prepare a GHG Emissions Reduction Plan. The elements of the GHG Emissions Reduction Plan include all of the following: • Prepare an inventory of all known or "reasonably discoverable" sources of GHG that exist within the City. In determining what is a source of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the City may rely on the definition of greenhouse gas emissions source" or "source" as defined in Section 38505 ofAB32 or its governing regulations. • A baseline inventory of Greenhouse Gases currently being emitted in the City from all of the source categories identified in the inventory prepared under subparagraph (a). • An inventory of the Greenhouse Gases emitted in the City in 1990 from all source categories identified in the inventory prepared under subparagraph (a). Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGEMDA ITEM I Page 64 PAGE 'Q ( QF (0 5 measures, economic incentive programs, and mitigation fee programs for federal sources. By 2010, annual average SO, emission reductions should total 2 tons per day. Even though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Nevertheless, all applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan would involve development that would contribute emissions associated with other criteria pollutants. Concentrations could increase because of the increase in vehicles and vehicle trips and the potential increase in commercial and industrial activity. The policies under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, Goals 1 -3 include measures to decrease emissions that could contain criteria pollutants. Such measures include: land use and transportation planning principles, agency cooperation to develop mitigation measures, limiting emissions during construction and conservation practices to decrease emissions overall. While these criteria pollutants are in attainment (or the status is unclassified) with state or federal standards, the potential to increase concentrations exists with the new development under the GPU. As a result, no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. h. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.j: Operational Impacts, Toxic Air Contaminants and Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of TACs and VOCs in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of goals and policies listed underthe Public Safetyand Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. All applicants for future development shall comply with AQMP control measures so as to reduce this impact to the greatest extent possible. The AQMP does not list specific measures to prevent air quality impacts from TACs. The policies in the GPU mitigate the impacts of TACs. The measures in the AQMP for VOCs may apply to TACs. The AQMP states that by 2010, annual average VOC emission reductions should tota1336 tons per day. Control measures in the AQMP include: emission reductions from architectural coatings and cleanup solvents, industrial process operations, fugitive emission sources, composting, in -use off -road vehicles and equipment, and emission charges of $5,000 per ton of VOC for stationary sources emitting more than 10 tons per year. Even Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM No,�_ �_L _?age 63 PAGE. Sa- OF I G S • An inventory of the Greenhouse Gases emitted in the City in 2007 from all source categories identified in the inventory prepared under subparagraph (a). • A projected inventory of the new Greenhouse Gases that can reasonably be expected to be emitted in the year 2020 due to the City's discretionary land use decisions pursuant to the General Plan update, as well as new Greenhouse Gases emitted by the City's internal government operations. • A target for reduction of those sources of emissions attributable to the City's discretionary land use decisions and its own internal government operations, and feasible GHG emission reduction measures whose purpose shall be to meet this reduction target by regulating those sources of Greenhouse Gases. • In addition to the GHG Emissions Reduction Plan, the General Plan sets forth the following relevant goals and policies that will tend to reduce GHG emissions in the project area. The moderating effect of each goal and policy is described in brackets. Air Quality Policies (Chapter 3. Public Safety and Welfare, Air Quality Section) 1.2 Promote land use patterns, such as mixed -use development, that reduce trip distance for work, shopping, and recreation by providing opportunities for residents to work, shop, and recreate near their homes. [Reduces the length of vehicle trips, thereby reducing vehicle emissions of GHGs.] 1.3 Provide for adequate buffers from existing sources of emissions, such as Interstate - 15 and industrial facilities, near sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, day care facilities, hospitals, or other care facilities. [Promotes open space forplants and trees that can absorb COz thereby reducing the emissions of GHGs.] 1.4 Ensure that new developments (especially sensitive receptors) include air quality mitigation measures in design features, such as barriers, landscaping, ventilation systems, and pollution reduction measures. [Promotes open space for plants and trees that can absorb COz, thereby reducing the emissions of GHGs.] 1.5 Encourage local employers to develop incentives to develop carpooling, bus transportation, biking, walking, and other alternative programs to solo- driver commuting. [Reduces the length of vehicle trips and promotes use of transit thereby reducing the number of trips and vehicle emissions of GHGs.] 1.6 Require the development of public and private facilities to provide for the needs of automobiles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders in site design and amenities such as bus turnouts for new developments and preferential parking spaces for carpools in non - residential developments. [Reduces the length of vehicle trips and promotes use of transit thereby reducing the number of trips and vehicle emissions of GHGs.] 1.7 Encourage `walkable neighborhoods" by siting parks and community centers near residential areas. (Promotes the use of non - fossil fuel powered vehicles, thereby reducing the number of trips and vehicle emissions of GHGs.] 1.8 Create opportunities for adopting incentives for planning and implementing infill development projects within urbanized areas. [Reduces the length of vehicle trips and promotes use of transit, thereby reducing the number of trips and vehicle emissions of GHGs.] Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA iiEtm7 r�o. _ Page 65 PAGE '2� 3 V ®rr ( 0 1.9 Support the SCAQMD in its development of improved ambient air quality monitoring capabilities and establishment of standards, thresholds, and rules to address, and where necessary mitigate, the air quality impacts of new development. [Promotes reduction in GHG to levels lower than current.] 3.2 Work with the county and regional agencies to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a special fund and a system of charges (e.g., pollution charges, user fees, congestion pricing, and toll roads) that requires, where possible, individuals who undertake polluting activities to bear the economic cost of their actions. [Promotes reduction in GHG over the status quo.] 3.3 Promote programs that educate the public about regional air quality issues, opportunities, and solutions. (Promotes reduction in GHGs.J 3.4 Pursue the purchase of alternative fuel vehicles forofficial City vehicles. [Promotes alternative modes of transportation that are GHG emission-free.] Sustainable Environment Policies (Chapter 4: Resource Protection and Preservation, Sustainable Environmental Goals Section) 12.1 Strive to achieve to U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification for new construction or rehabilitation of buildings by meeting established green building standards. [Promotes energy conservation that will result in fewer emissions from power plants.] 12.2 Develop a Green Building Program that addresses the provision of green building technology in construction practices whereverpossible by encouraging methods that conserve natural resources or utilize them efficiently. [Promotes energy conservation that will result in fewer emissions from power plants.] At this time it is not possible to determine if measures can be identified as a part of the GHG reduction plan or if p olicies incorporated into the General Plan would reduce the contribution of the Preferred Land Use Plan to global warming to below a level of significance. Emission reduction measures targeting sources of GHG emissions called for in AB 32 will likely be adopted in the near future, although no measures have yet been adopted. The CARB has not yet developed the de minimis criteria establishing the level of GHG emissions that would not be subject to the emission reduction measures. Furthermore, most of the emission reduction measures of the City's Climate Protection Action Plan do not address GHG emissions associated with VMT, energy consumption, and waste generation related to land use development projects. As a result the contribution of GHG emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan to global warming is considered a significant and unavoidable impact. But once CARB establishes GHG emissions standards, all future projects implemented pursuant to this GPU will be evaluated in accordance with those emissions standards. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. At this time it is not possible to determine if measures can be identified as a part of the GHG reduction plan or if policies incorporated into the General Plan would reduce the contribution of the Preferred Land Use Plan to global warming to below a level of significance. Emission Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AcFJOA ITEM 'N ° — O- � -- - -Page 66 PAGE_, i— OF -10 '�- reduction measures targeting sources of GHG emissions called for in AB 32 will likely be adopted in the near future, although no measures have yet been adopted. The CARB has not yet developed the de minimis criteria establishing the level of GHG emissions that would not be subject to the emission reduction measures. Furthermore, most of the emission reduction measures of the City's Climate Protection Action Plan do not address GHG emissions associated with VMT, energy consumption, and waste generation related to land use development projects. As a result the contribution of GHG emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan to global warming is considered a significant and unavoidable impact. But once CARB establishes GHG emissions standards, all future projects implemented pursuant to this GPU will be evaluated in accordance with those emissions standards. j. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.m: The regional and cumulative impacts on CO, NO,, and 03 concentrations related to conflicts or obstruction of the applicable air quality plan, violation of air quality standards set forth by the SCAQMD AQMP, and contributions to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant in a non - attainment region would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within each District Plan will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of policies listed under Public Safety and Welfare Air Quality Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6 and through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. Measures listed above for impacts 3.6.5 a —k would reduce impacts associated with buildout of the district plans. Even though these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes oralterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate thesignificant effects on the environment. Pollutants of particular concern in the Lake Elsinore area are 03, CO, and particulate matter. A comparison of recent air quality monitoring data collected from the local monitoring stations to the state and federal standards for criteria pollutants is provided in Table 3.6 -3 of the DER. The high concentration of stationary sources of air contaminants in the western portion of the SCAB and mobile sources throughout the SCAB contribute to generally poor air quality in the region. The 2003 AQMP established a program to reduce the SCAB's emissions based on 2001 SCAG population projections. As discussed in Section 3.1 and Section 3.11 of this EIR, the GPU would accommodate a population increase that surpasses current SCAG projections. The GPU would obstruct implementation of the AQMP by not contributing to its goals of regional reductions of air pollutant emissions in the region, and it would conflict with the AQMP in its inconsistency with AQMP projections for pollutant emissions; this obstruction Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA iTib I NO.L Page 67 PACE_ S__ CF TO and conflict are a significant air quality impact that cannot be mitigated through implementation of the air quality- related measures set forth in the GPU. Control measures in the AQMP include: promotion of lighter color roofing and road materials; requiring clean fuels, supporting alternative fuels, and reducing petroleum dependency; pursuit of long -term advanced technologies measures; process modifications and improvements; best management practices; and market incentives. However, considering the population anticipated by the GPU exceeds projections used to Prepare the AQMP and Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the GPU consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. k. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.n: Development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3`d Street Annexation could result in short- and long -term impacts related to air quality that would be considered significant. Mitigation: The impact will be partially mitigated with implementation of the following mitigation measure(s): Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on air quality from operational emissions through implementation of policies listed under Public Safety and Welfare Air Quality Goal 2, Policies 2.1 -2.6 and through implementation of goals and policies listed under the Public Safety and Welfare Chapter, Air Quality Section, specifically Goals 1 and 3, Policies 1.2 -1.9 and 3.1 -3.4. Although these measures would reduce emissions, no mitigation is available that would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. Finding /Facts in Support of the Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which partially mitigate the significant effects on the environment. The GPU includes policies that would reduce emissions associated with future development within the 3rd Street Annexation area. However as discussed above for impact 3.6.5d, considering Riverside County is a non - attainment area no mitigation is available that would make the development anticipated within the 3d street Annexation consistent with the AQMP and reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 68 AGENDA ITEM N0. l PAGE �6 Qr O-r2 FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT CEQA requires that the EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project, or to the location of the project, which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Section 15126(d)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines states that the "..discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." The proposed project has been compared to three alternative development scenarios, including the No Project alternative as prescribed by CEQA. These alternatives include: 1) No Project Alternative; 2) Alternative 1 -Low Density Alternative and 3) Alternative 2 –High Density Alternative. A comparison of the alternatives is presented below. Alternatives Comparison Socio- Economic Variable Preferred Land Use Plan Quantity Dwelling Units No Project/ High Density Existing Alternative General Plan (2) Low Density Alternative (1) Single Family Housing 46,597 59,345 28,491 Multi Family Housing 21,243 40,214 16,609 Total— Housing 67,841 103,395 99,559 45,099 Population 205,070 287,400 296,703 135,159 1. NO PROJECT /No DEVELOPMENT (No PROJECT ALTERNATIVE) CEQA requires that the EIR address a No Project Alternative. For purposes of this EIR, the No Project Alternative is defined as the existing conditions plus the projects that had received planning approvals but were not completed prior to preparation of the Draft GPU. The No Project Alternative also consists of implementing the existing General Plan, zoning and other City regulations and ordinances without a GPU. The buildout population of the existing General Plan is 287,400 people. Summary of Major Environmental Effects Under the No Project alternative, the City would continue to function under the direction of the existing adopted General Plan policies. As a result certain policies of the GPU would not be implemented that may result in a reduction of impacts from that associated with the existing general plan. Considering that implementation of the No Project Alternative would also allow for increased development and population growth within the City that would exceed that proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan the No Project alternative would not reduce the severity of impacts from that identified for the Preferred Land Use Plan. Additional details regarding potential impacts of the No Project alternative compared with that of the Preferred Land Use Plan and the GPU are provided Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA I` E it NO. I Page 69 PAGE.B__ 8F. 1 Q S in Chapter 4 of the DEIR. The following is a summary comparison of the No Project Alternative with the Preferred Land Use Plan as well as the new goals and policies of the GPU. • Greater aesthetic impacts; This alternative would not include General Plan policies that would include improvements to the visual quality of the City or creation of well - defined public space. Overall, impact would be greater than the proposed project due to having fewer policies to protect scenic resources. • Similar agriculture and farmland impacts; • Greater impacts to air quality; The No Project Alternative would permit as much or more development than the Preferred Land Use Plan and would result in increased air quality impacts; • Greater impacts to biological resources, The No Project Alternative would result in greater biological impacts than the Preferred Land Use Plan. The GPU has policies that implement the MSHCP, which protect biological resources in the region that do not apply to the No Project Alternative; • Similar historic, cultural and paleontological resources impacts; • Similar impacts to geology, soils and mineral resources; • Similar impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials; • Similar impacts to population and housing; • Greater impacts to hydrology /water quality; The No Project Alternative would increase offsite runoff due to increased surface coverage by pavements and structures, and the increase could be greater due to unregulated growth in the City; • Similar impacts to land use; • Similar noise impacts; and • Greater impacts to Community Services and Facilities. Underthe No Project Alternative, existing General Plan policies would applyand development would continue to increase, putting additional demand on public services. There may be a larger increase in demand than for the Preferred Land Use Plan with this alternative, considering the projected population buildout is higher. Greater impacts to transportation; Buildout of the City in accordance with the existing General Plan would result in greater impacts on traffic compared with the Preferred Land Use Plan. As shown in Table 4 -1, the existing General Plan buildout population and total number of housing units is greater than the Preferred Land Use Plan. As a result, the traffic levels anticipated under the existing General Plan would be greater than the Preferred Land Use Plan. Project Objectives Implementation of the No Project Alternative would not meet the objective of the General Plan Update to create a General Plan consistent with state law that guides city planning until 2030. Specifically the City is required by state law to periodically update the General Plan. In addition, under the No Project alternative, the City would continue to function under the direction of the existing adopted General Plan policies. Certain policies of the GPU would not be implemented that may result in a reduction of impacts from that associated with the existing general plan. As a result, implementation of the No Project Alternative would not allow the City to achieve the following objectives of the GPU: Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM �?i0 - -__ 1.-�- p---'— Page 70 PAGE,.�,,.S,�Sd.. P - --J-0— `_ • Create a Land Use Plan that encourages the creation of a vibrant and active downtown and a lake destination. • Create a plan to preserve the unique topography and visual character of the City through the preservation of steep slopes. • Create a General Plan that recognizes the rich history of the City and preserves historical resources. • Create a user - friendly plan for City officials, staff, and the community of Lake Elsinore. In addition, implementation of the No Project Alternative would not eliminate or substantially reduce impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan. Considering that implementation of the No Project Alternative would also allow for increased development and population growth within the City that would exceed that proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan the No Project alternative would not reduce the severity of impacts from that identified for the Preferred Land Use Plan. Feasibility This alternative is feasible. Comparative Merits Implementation of the No Project Alternative which consists of implementation of the existing General Plan has no comparative merits to implementing the Preferred Land Use Plan and the goals and policies of the GPU. Certain policies of the GPU would not be implemented that may result in a reduction of impacts from that associated with the existing general plan. Considering that implementation of the No Project Alternative would also allow for increased development and population growth within the City that would exceed that proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan, the No Project alternative would not reduce the severity of impacts from that identified for the Preferred Land Use Plan. 2. ALTERNATIVE 1 -LOW DENSITY ALTERNATIVE The Low Density Alternative is based on the low end of the permitted ranges of dwelling units per acre in each land use designation. The Low Density Alternative differs from the Preferred Land Use Plan because the densities are lower than the mid -range densities of the Preferred Land Use Plan. This alternative would allow for fewer dwelling units for those lands designated residential, including hillside, low, low- medium, medium, high, residential mixed use, and commercial mixed use. The buildout population of the Low Density Alternative would be 135,159 people. The Low Density Alternative includes commercial, industrial, and other non - residential uses that are consistent with the acreage for those uses proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan. Summary of Major Environmental Effects The following is a summary comparison of Alternative 1- Low Density Alternative with the Preferred Land Use Plan as well as the new goals and policies of the GPU. • Less aesthetic impacts; Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM jpjo. Page 71 PAGE_ 6R_._. oF_ _ (0 S • Similar agriculture and farmland impacts; • Less impacts to air quality; however significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality would not be avoided by implementation of this alternative. • Less impacts to biological resources; A uniform reduction in permitted density would not in and of itself result in substantially different impacts compared to those anticipated under buildout of the Preferred Land Use Plan. If development on more environmentally sensitive parcels was more highly restricted, this alternative could have less impact than the proposed project on those parcels; however, these impacts would still be potentially significant. • Less historic, cultural and paleontological resources impacts; • Similar impacts to geology, soils and mineral resources; • Less impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials; • Less impacts to population and housing; • Less impacts to hydrology /water quality; • Less impacts to land use; At its maximum, the Low Density Alternative allows for up to 18 dwelling units per acre. This alternative includes the low end of the ranges of dwelling units per acre in each land use designation. The Low Density Alternative differs from the Preferred Land Use Plan because the residential land use densities are lower than the mid- range densities than the Preferred Land Use Plan. As a result there would be substantially less housing units than that proposed by the Preferred Land Use Plan. Overall, the community character of the area would not significantly change with the implementation of the Low Density Alternative Land Use Plan, but rather would be enhanced, updated, and improved. Established communities will not be divided or changed significantly in a negative way with the implementation of the Low Density Alternative. • Less noise impacts; • Less impacts to Community Services and Facilities; and • Less impacts to transportation. Project Objectives Implementation of the Low Density Alternative would not meet the objective of the General Plan Update to Create a General Plan consistent with state law that guides City planning until 2030. The GPU and the Preferred Land Use Plan is intended to provide adequate housing and commercial services for the anticipated growth within the City and surrounding Sphere of Influence. Implementation of the policies presented in the proposed GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would achieve the housing goals outlined in the existing Housing Element and are designed to accommodate the next scheduled update of the Housing Element. Implementation of the Low Density Alternative and the associated reduction in the number of housing units would not allowthe City to achieve housing goals anticipated for the City and sphere of influence as a part of the ongoing Housing Element Update. The goals and policies of the GPU would not change with implementation of the Low Density Alternative. As a result, it is anticipated that the following objectives of the GPU could be achieved with implementation of the Low Density Alternative: • Create a Land Use Plan that encourages the creation of a vibrant and active downtown and a lake destination. • Create a plan to preserve the unique topography and visual character of the City through the preservation of steep slopes. • Create a General Plan that recognizes the rich history of the City and preserves historical Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 72 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 90 OF I C) 5 resources. • Create a user - friendly plan for City officials, staff, and the community of Lake Elsinore. Feasibility This alternative is feasible. Comparative Merits Implementation of the Reduced Density Alternative would reduce impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan related to aesthetics, biological resources, air quality, cultural resources, historic resources, paleontological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, population and housing, land use, noise and transportation due to the decrease in the amount of housing and population anticipated with the City and Sphere of Influence. However, implementation of this alternative would not avoid significant and unavoidable impacts of the Preferred Land Use Plan related to land use, noise and air quality. 3. ALTERNATIVE 2- HIGH DENSITY ALTERNATIVE The High Density Alternative allows for a buildout that reflects the high end of the permitted ranges of dwelling units per acre in each land use designation described in Section 2.3.2.1. This alternative is different from the Preferred Land Use Plan in that the densities for land use designations are higher than those included in the Preferred Land Use Plan. This alternative would allow fora higher number of dwelling units forthose lands designated residential, including hillside, low, low- medium, medium, high, residential mixed use, and commercial mixed use. The buildout population of the High Density Alternative would be 296,703 people. The High Density Alternative includes commercial, industrial and other non - residential uses that are consistentwith the acreage for those uses proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan. Summary of Major Environmental Effects The following is a summary comparison of Alternative 1 -Low Density Alternative with the Preferred Land Use Plan as well as the new goals and policies of the GPU. • Greater aesthetic impacts; • Similar agriculture and farmland impacts; • Greater impacts to air quality; However significant and unavoidable impacts of the High Density Alternative would be similar to that of the Preferred Land Use Plan. • Greater impacts to biological resources; • Greater historic, cultural and paleontological resources impacts; • Similar impacts to geology, soils and mineral resources; • Greater impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials; • Greater impacts to population and housing; • Greater impacts to hydrology /water quality; • Greater impacts to land use; • Greater noise impacts; • Greater impacts to Community Services and Facilities; and • Greater impacts to transportation. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AA pp^^..gqyy}}��qq��pp 55 qq ( Page 73 a4FFENDA Fa EtA 1�O.� orarr C1 I OF (O S Project Objectives The goals and policies of the GPU would not change with implementation of the High Density Alternative. As a result it is anticipated that the following objectives of the GPU could be achieved with implementation of the Low Density Alternative: • Implementation of the Low Density Alternative would not meet the objective of the General Plan Update to create a General Plan consistent with state law that guides City planning until 2030. • Create a Land Use Plan that encourages the creation of a vibrant and active downtown and a lake destination. • Create a General Plan that recognizes the rich history of the City and preserves historical resources. • Create a user - friendly plan for City officials, staff, and the community of Lake Elsinore. However, visual impacts on aesthetics would be greater under the High Density Alternative than under the Preferred Land Use Plan. This alternative would allow for more development at a higher density, which would likely block more views because of height or proximity to adjacent development. Fewer view corridors would exist between buildings, which would impact views. Development of vacant or underutilized land under this alternative could also result in a significant change to the visual character of the City. Light and glare impacts associated with development of vacant land would be more than the proposed GPU. As a result, it is not anticipated that the following objective would be achieved with implementation of the High Density Alternative: Create a plan to preserve the unique topography and visual character of the City through the preservation of steep slopes. Feasibility This alternative is feasible. Comparative Merits Implementation of the High Density Alternative would result in greater impacts than the Preferred Land Use Plan related to aesthetics, biological resources, air quality, cultural resources, historic resources, paleontological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, population and housing, land use, noise and transportation due to the increase in the amount of housing and population anticipated with the City and Sphere of Influence. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AO€.NDA 1-1 EM NO. l Page 74 PAGE q a_ OF ( G S SECTION IV RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the Project consists of the following documents, at a minimum: • The November 15, 2005 and December 5, 2005 Notice of Preparation (NOP) issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project; • All comments and correspondence submitted by public agencies and members of the public during a City- hosted public scoping meeting held on November 30, 2005; • The December 2007 Draft EIR and April 2008 Final EIR, including appendices and technical studies included or referenced in the Draft EIR; • The December 2007 Draft General Plan and April 2008 Final General Plan, including appendices and background studies included or referenced in the Draft General Plan; • All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45 -day public comment period on the Draft EIR; • All comments and correspondence submitted by members of the public during a City- hosted public meeting on the GPU and Draft EIR held on January 10, 2008; • All comments and correspondence submitted to the City with respect to the proposed project, in addition to timely comments on the Draft EIR; • The mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) for the proposed project; • All findings and resolutions adopted by the City decision makers in connection with the proposed project, and all documents cited or referred to therein; • All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, orother planning documents relating to the proposed project; • All documents and information submitted to the City by responsible, trustee, or other public agencies, or by individuals or organizations, in connection with the proposed project, up through the date the City Council approved the proposed project;' • Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations; • Any documents expressly cited in these findings, in addition to those cited above; and • Any other materials required to be in the Record of Proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The custodian of the record of proceedings is the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department, whose office is located at 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. The City has relied on all of the documents listed above in reaching its decision on the proposed project, even if every document was not formally presented to the City Council decision - makers as part of the City's files generated in connection with the proposed project. Environmental Findings General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 75 AGE14DA 110,1 NO, PACE 9 74 nr 10 C STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a public agency to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Update has identified and discussed significant effects that may occur as a result of the proposed project. With implementation of the Project Design Features, Standard Conditions, and /or project - specific mitigation measures identified for each environmental topic, most of the potentially significant impacts can be reduced to a level considered less than significant, except for unavoidable significant impacts as discussed in Section III of the Findings. The City of Lake Elsinore has made a reasonable and good faith effort to eliminate or substantially mitigate the potential impacts resulting from the proposed project. Impacts, in these and all other cases, have been mitigated to the extent considered feasible. All significant adverse impacts are identified in the Final EIR and are addressed in the Findings, which accompany this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The proposed project will result in the following significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels: Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds cannot be fully mitigated to a level of less than significant, despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and set forth herein, are described in this section. The applicable environmental issue areas include Land Use, Air Quality and Noise. 1. LAND USE a. Impact: Impact 3.1.4d: As discussed in Table 3.1 -4, the projected population with buildout of the Preferred Land Use Plan is 205,070. The buildout for the proposed GPU within incorporated land only is projected to be 116,471. SCAG has projected the population to be 71,737 based on the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan within incorporated areas of the city only. Based on recent conversations with SCAG (2007), their forecast will increase to approximately 95,000 with the next Regional Transportation Plan. The variance of 21,471, or roughly 20 %, between the Preferred Land Use Plan and the SCAG forecast is considered to be in substantial conformance with the SCAG population forecasts with the understanding that the greater population figure correlates to additional housing opportunities to provide affordable housing, and the GPU contains policies that require a job- housing balance. b. Impact: Impact 3.1.4f. Goals and policies for land use under each District Plan provide for land use compatibility; adequacy of community services, recreation, and open space; and circulation standards. As a result, overall impacts related to land use compatibility associated with implementation of the District Plans will be less than significant with the exception of the East Lake District Plan C. Impact: Impact 3.1.4h: Cumulative Impacts. The increase in population allowed underthe GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on community services and facilities, transportation, air quality, noise, biological resources, water resources, housing, and aesthetics in the region. However, with the implementation of the Growth Management Plan as proposed in the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter, these impacts would be reduced. A detailed discussion of the impacts of the GPU and Preferred Statement of Overriding Considerations General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM N0. Page 76 PAGE OF L 0 7 Land Use Plan impacts related to these issues is provided in subsequent chapters of the EIR. 2. NOISE a. Impact: Impact 3.5.5b: Traffic Noise. An increase in traffic volume throughout the local and regional circulation system as a result of GPU implementation has the potential to generate noise levels along roadway corridors that would exceed standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). The corridors of 1 -15, SR -74, and Railroad Canyon Road are particularly sensitive to additional traffic noise due to the substantial noise levels currently generated along these routes. At 2030 traffic levels associated with buildout of the GPU, the ADT on the freeways and roadways would increase. As shown by comparing 3.5 -2 and 3.5 -3 of the DEIR, the increase in traffic at GPU buildout would extend the 70, 65, and 60 Ldn contours beyond existing conditions. As shown in Table 3.5 -3, residential uses are generally incompatible within the 65 Ldn contour. Considering that the 65 Ldn contour would extend beyond existing conditions, additional existing and planned residential areas in proximity to major public roadways could be subject to exterior noise levels that exceed City standards. As a result, traffic levels at buildout of the GPU could result in significant noise impacts on existing land uses. Developments implemented in accordance with the GPU have the potential to place new receptors in areas that would receive traffic noise (both existing and future) exceeding standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards and to reduce traffic- related noise. Placement of new uses in areas subject to excessive traffic noise would be considered a significant impact. b. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.h: District Plans. Noise impacts resulting from the District Plans would be considered less than significant if the policies set forth in the District Plans are incorporated into future development projects within the District Plan area. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed ortraffic levels will increase substantially, such as that anticipated for 1 -15, Riverside Drive, and Grand Avenue, there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects within a District Plan, leading to identification of significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. 3. AIR QUALITY a. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.c: Construction Impacts. Emissions of Non - Attainment Pollutants Construction- related emission of the SCAB's non - attainment pollutants (03, CO, and particulate matter) would be significant. b. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.d: Operational Impacts. Consistency with AQMP The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflicts with the AQMP by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant. Statement of Overriding Considerations General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ACEISDA ITEM No...____L__P_4ge 77 PAGE,._. L 5 0F_LO-�L C. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.e: Operational Impacts, Emissions within SCAQMD Thresholds. The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflict with the SCAMD Thresholds by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant d. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.f. Operational Impacts, Carbon Monoxide Emissions. Although new technology and stringent regulations have decreased CO concentrations in the region, the growth inducement allowed under the GPU would cause an increase in CO emitters and emissions in the City would increase and contribute to cumulative CO concentration increases. Therefore, while the policies under the GPU alleviate CO emissions, the increased growth would cause impacts on air quality that are significant. e. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.g: Operational Impacts, Ozone Emissions. Although aggressive emission control programs in the SCAB and enhanced vehicle emissions technology have decreased 03 concentrations in recent years, the amount of new development under the GPU still would contribute to local and regional 03 concentration increases. Therefore, the existing and cumulative impacts would be considered significant. f. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.h: Operational Impacts, Particulate Matter Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase construction activities and vehicle trips that contribute to particulate matter emissions in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. g. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational impacts. Other Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of criteria pollutants in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. h. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.j: Operational Impacts, Toxic Air Contaminants and Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of TACs and VOCs in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. i. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational Impacts, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The impact scale for climate change is global, and the amount of GHG emissions necessary to effect radiative forcing (e.g., global warming) is on a global scale. Population growth is anticipated to occur with the proposed project, and is expected to result in increased emissions of GHGs, largely due to increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT), as well as increased energy consumption. The CO2 emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan shown in Tables 3.6 -10 and 3.6 -11 would contribute to global warming and potential adverse global environmental effects. Increased GHG emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan could also potentially conflict with the requirement of AB 32 to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. As a result, the GHG emissions from implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan would contribute to a potentially significant impact related to global warming. j. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.m: The regional and cumulative impacts on CO, NO., and 03 concentrations related to conflicts or obstruction of the applicable airquaiity plan, violation of air quality standards set forth by the SCAQMD AQMP, and contributions to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant in a non- attainment region would be considered significant. Statement of Overriding Considerations General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ACENdDA 17EM NO. i_ Page 78 ?AGE % OF Jr QrJ k. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.n: Development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation could result in short- and long -term impacts related to air quality that would be considered significant. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council must balance the benefits of the proposed project against any unavoidable environmental impacts in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, those impacts may be considered "acceptable." The City has determined that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from proposed project implementation are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the project. In making this determination, the factors and public benefits specified below were considered. The City further finds that except forthe proposed project, all other alternatives set forth in the EIR are infeasible because they would prohibit the realization of project objectives and /or of specific economic, social, and other benefits that this City Council finds outweigh any environmental benefits of the alternatives. Having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the proposed project to the extent feasible by adopting the mitigation measures; having considered the entire administrative record on the project; and having weighed the benefits of the project against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation, the City Council has determined that the following social, economic, and environmental benefits of the project outweigh the potential unavoidable adverse impacts and render those potential adverse environmental impacts acceptable based upon the following overriding considerations: SOCIAL OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS • The Community Form chapter of the GPU would provide a goals and policies as well as a strategic framework to ensure that future development will be designed to encourage land use compatibility, historic preservation, and implementation of an adequate transportation and circulation systems as well as provision of parks and recreation, community facilities and services, housing, green building strategies, and district plans. • The Public Safety and Welfare chapter of the GPU includes goals and polices to ensure that future development will addresses issues associated with the safety and welfare of the City's general public. The sections include air quality, hazards (including natural disasters), and noise. • The Resource Protection and Preservation chapter sets forth policies and programs to ensure that future development will be designed to encourage preservation of biological resources, open space, water resources, cultural and paleontological resources, and aesthetics. • Implementation of the existing General Plan has no comparative merits to implementing the Preferred Land Use Plan and the goals and policies of the GPU. The population and total number of residential units allowed within the City under the existing General Plan would be 287,400 compared with 205,070 for the Preferred Land Use Plan. The total number of housing units permitted with the existing general plan would be 103,395 compared with 67,841 for the Preferred Land Use Plan. Considering that implementation of the Existing General Plan would also allow for increased development and population growth within the City that would exceed that proposed as a part of the Preferred Land Use Plan, development in accordance with the existing General Plan alternative would result in greater impacts to the Statement of Overriding Considerations General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM Fats. Page 79 PACE �j-] 0F,_0� environment from that identified for the Preferred Land Use Plan. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan will provide housing for the City of Lake Elsinore and Inland Empire's growing population. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan will provide for a variety of housing opportunities, ranging in size and affordability to meet the housing needs of the region. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan will provide for increased acreage for recreation uses and open space. • The GPU would create a General Plan consistent with state law that guides City planning until 2030. • The Preferred Land Use Plan would create a Land Use Plan that encourages the creation of a vibrant and active downtown and a lake destination. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would create a plan to preserve the unique topography and visual character of the City through the preservation of steep slopes. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would create a General Plan that recognizes the rich history of the City and preserves historical resources. • The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan would create a user - friendly plan for City officials, staff, and the community of Lake Elsinore. • The GPU includes a Capital Improvement Program that will guide provision of adequate transportation and community facilities within the City and Sphere of Influence. ECONOMIC OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The GPU and Preferred Land use Plan includes a Capital Improvements Program that will provide for substantial upgrades to regional traffic circulation and public utilities (sewer, water, and reclaimed water) within the City and Sphere of Influence. The City Council has determined that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through approval and implementation of the proposed project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the project, which cannot be mitigated. The City Council finds that each of the proposed project benefits outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the EIR and, therefore, finds those impacts to be acceptable. Statement of Overriding Considerations General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Page 80 AGENDA @ T me�o f30. PAGE 0L'6-0r--JQ-S- CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR The City of Lake Elsinore has reviewed and considered the Final EIR in evaluating the General Plan Update. The City finds that the Final EIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA, State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines; and that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City of Lake Elsinore; and that no new significant impacts as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5 have been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR which would require recirculation. The City Council certifies the Environmental Impact Report based on the following findings and conclusions: A. FINDINGS The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the EIR and, although subject to all applicable and feasible Project Design Features, Standard Conditions, and mitigation measures, the impacts cannot be mitigated to less than significant: 1. LAND USE a. Impact: Impact 3.1.4d: As discussed in Table 3.1-4, the projected population with buildout of the Preferred Land Use Plan is 205,070. The buildout for the proposed GPU within incorporated land only is projected to be 116,471. SCAG has projected the population to be 71,737 based on the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan within incorporated areas of the city only. Based on recent conversations with SCAG (2007), their forecast will increase to approximately 95,000 with the next Regional Transportation Plan. The variance of 21,471, or roughly 20 %, between the Preferred Land Use Plan and the SCAG forecast is considered to be insubstantial conformance with the SCAG population forecasts with the understanding that the greater population figure correlates to additional housing opportunities to provide affordable housing, and the GPU contains policies that require a job- housing balance. b. Impact: Impact 3.1.4f: Goals and policies for land use under each District Plan provide for land use compatibility; adequacy of community services, recreation, and open space; and circulation standards. As a result, overall impacts related to land use compatibility associated with implementation of the District Plans will be less than significant with the exception of the East Lake District Plan C. Impact: Impact 3.1.4h: Cumulative Impacts. The increase in population allowed under the GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on community services and facilities, transportation, air quality, noise, biological resources, water resources, housing, and aesthetics in the region. However, with the implementation of the Growth Management Plan as proposed in the Growth Management section of the Community Form chapter, these impacts would be reduced. A detailed discussion of the impacts of the GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan impacts related to these issues is provided in subsequent chapters of the EIR. Certification of the Final EIR General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ACENDA el EM No. Page 81 PAGE_ T9___OF --10_ j 2. NOISE a. Impact: Impact 3.5.5b: Traffic Noise. An increase in traffic volume throughout the local and regional circulation system as a result of GPU implementation has the potential to generate noise levels along roadway corridors that would exceed standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). The corridors of 1 -15, SR -74, and Railroad Canyon Road are particularly sensitive to additional traffic noise due to the substantial noise levels currently generated along these routes. At 2030 traffic levels associated with buildout of the GPU, the ADT on the freeways and roadways would increase. As shown by comparing 3.5 -2 and 3.5 -3 of the DEIR, the increase in traffic at GPU buildout would extend the 70, 65, and 60 Ldn contours beyond existing conditions. As shown in Table 3.5 -3, residential uses are generally incompatible within the 65 Ldn contour. Considering that the 65 Ldn contour would extend beyond existing conditions, additional existing and planned residential areas in proximity to major public roadways could be subject to exterior noise levels that exceed City standards. As a result, traffic levels at buildout of the GPU could result in significant noise impacts on existing land uses. Developments implemented in accordance with the GPU have the potential to place new receptors in areas that would receive traffic noise (both existing and future) exceeding standards set forth in the Zoning Code (including the Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix and the Interior /Exterior Noise Standards). GPU policy sets forth the City's intent to enforce the Zoning Code and other noise standards and to reduce traffic- related noise. Placement of new uses in areas subject to excessive traffic noise would be considered a significant impact. b. Impact: Impact 3.5.5.h: District Plans. Noise impacts resulting from the District Plans would be considered less than significant if the policies set forth in the District Plans are incorporated into future development projects within the District Plan area. However, in some cases where realignments or upgrades of roadways are proposed or traffic levels will increase substantially, such as that anticipated for 1 -15, Riverside Drive, and Grand Avenue, there may be no mitigation that would adequately reduce future traffic noise as experienced by existing land uses or future development projects within a District Plan, leading to identification of significant and unmitigated impacts at the project level. 3. AIR QUALITY a. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.c: Construction Impacts. Emissions of Non- Attainment Pollutants. Construction - related emission of the SCAB'S non - attainment pollutants (03, CO, and particulate matter) would be significant. b. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.d: Operational Impacts, Consistency with AQMP. The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflicts with the AQMP by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant. C. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.e: Operational Impacts, Emissions within SCAQMD Thresholds. The GPU and Preferred Land Use Plan conflict with the SCAMD Thresholds by proposing population growth in excess of previous planning projects and obstructs implementation of Certification of the Final EIR General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ' Page 82 A0E fuOA ITIL F3iE.---��. PAG (d _0_0 � lc 7 the AQMP by not reducing its pollutant emissions. Impacts associated with buildout of the GPU would be considered significant d. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.f: Operational Impacts, Carbon Monoxide Emissions Although new technology and stringent regulations have decreased CO concentrations in the region, the growth inducement allowed under the GPU would cause an increase in CO emitters and emissions in the City would increase and contribute to cumulative CO concentration increases. Therefore, while the policies under the GPU alleviate CO emissions, the increased growth would cause impacts on air quality that are significant. e. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.g: Operational Impacts, Ozone Emissions Although aggressive emission control programs in the SCAB and enhanced vehicle emissions technology have decreased 03 concentrations in recent years, the amount of new development under the GPU still would contribute to local and regional 03 concentration increases. Therefore, the existing and cumulative impacts would be considered significant. f. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.h: Operational Impacts, Particulate Matter Emissions Development allowed under the GPU would increase construction activities and vehicle trips that contribute to particulate matter emissions in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the Cityand the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. g. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational Impacts, Other Criteria Pollutant Emissions Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of criteria pollutants in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. h. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.j: Operational Impacts, Toxic Air Contaminants and Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions. Development allowed under the GPU would increase emissions of TACs and VOCs in the City. While the policies set forth would alleviate the impacts on air quality in the City and the region, existing and cumulative impacts are considered significant. i. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.1: Operational Impacts, Greenhouse Gas Emissions The impact scale for climate change is global, and the amount of GHG emissions necessary to effect radiative forcing (e.g., global warming) is on a global scale. Population growth is anticipated to occur with the proposed project, and is expected to result in increased emissions of GHGs, largely due to increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT), as well as increased energy consumption. The CO2 emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan shown in Tables 3.6 -10 and 3.6 -11 would contribute to global warming and potential adverse global environmental effects. Increased GHG emissions associated with implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan could also potentially conflict with the requirement of AB 32 to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. As a result, the GHG emissions from implementation of the Preferred Land Use Plan would contribute to a potentially significant impact related to global warming. j. Impact: Impact 3.6.5.m: The regional and cumulative impacts on CO, NO., and 03 concentrations related to conflicts or obstruction of the applicable air quality plan, violation of air quality standards set forth by the SCAQMD AQMP, and contributions to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant in a non - attainment region would be considered significant. k. Im act: Impact 3.6.5.n: Development proposed in accordance with the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3`d Street Annexation could result in short- and long -term impacts related to air quality that would be considered significant. Certification of the Final EIR General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore RGENDAI'1®fwR�£9.____,� Page 83 PAGE_ O —(Or- ( 0 - B. CONCLUSIONS All significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the EIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance, except for the impact(s) listed above and described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. 2. Other reasonable alternatives to the proposed project that could feasibly achieve most of the basic objectives of the project have been considered. Some of the alternatives were feasible but did not meet the project objectives; others met the project objectives but were determined not to be feasible. Since the alternatives considered either did not serve to reduce or avoid potentially significant impacts, or because the alternatives offer no feasible means of avoiding the significant effects identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the alternatives are rejected in favor of the General Plan Update. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the proposed project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the project. Certification of the Final EIR General Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore ?tCi NDA ITEM NO. __L Page S4 PAGE I Q2 OF 105 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE PREFERRED LAND USE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore adopted its last General Plan on November 27, 1990 and is hereby comprehensively updating its General Plan in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section(s) 65300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, a General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) was formed, which was comprised of local residents, business owners and developers who provided needed citizen input for the plan formation; and WHEREAS, the GPAC met a total of fourteen (14) times between March 2005 and October 2006 and also participated in the public workshops and Joint City Council /Planning Commission /GPAC study sessions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for General Plan Updates; and WHEREAS, public notice of the General Plan Update has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on April 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General Plan Update, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the General Plan Update. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 20051211019) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A 45 -day public review period ran from December 5, 2007 to January 18, 2008. Responses to comments received during the public review period were prepared and will be incorporated into the Final EIR. The Planning Commission further finds that the El represents the City's independent judgment. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the General Plan Update: 1. The proposed comprehensive General Plan Update will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the City, or b) injurious to the neighborhoods or properties within the City. AU04 A ITEM NO. I PAGE (3 � -_ o.- PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 The proposed General Plan Update has been thoroughly analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects. Although, the Draft EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in unavoidable adverse impacts specifically related to: population projections on land use; East Lake District Plan land use incompatibility; effects of land use changes on other environmental issue areas, traffic noise; noise associated with future road improvements within District Plan areas; construction impacts associated with ozone, CO, and particulate matter; inconsistency with the air quality management plan; exceedance of SCAQMD thresholds during operations; operational impacts associated with ozone, CO, particulate matter, VOCs, other criteria pollutant emissions, and greenhouse gases; cumulative impacts associated with operations; and, long- and short-term impacts related to the implementation of the Third Street Annexation, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, which "balances" the proposed project against this unavoidable environmental effects. 2. The proposed General Plan Update will permit reasonable and logical development of the City consistent with its constraints. The proposed Preferred Land Use Plan will provide flexibility and opportunity in the development of residential, industrial, commercial, open space and recreational uses within the City's corporate boundaries, while anticipating land use within its Sphere of Influence and Planning Areas. 3. The proposed General Plan Update would establish land use densities and usage more in character with the City's location, access, and constraints. The General Plan Update establishes neighborhoods or "Districts" (See District Plan under separate cover) which will provide an integration and identification of cooperative land uses throughout the City of Lake Elsinore. Additionally, the Environmental Impact Report has analyzed all three (3) alternatives and has analyzed, negotiated and provided a Circulation Plan which will provide safe and efficient circulation throughout the City. 4. The proposed General Plan Update ( "Project ") will have some significant effects on the environment and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared therefor. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), which was prepared in accordance with Section 15084 (Preparing the Draft EIR) of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances and analyses for the proposed project. The Draft EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in unavoidable adverse impacts specifically related to: population projections on land use; East Lake District Plan land use incompatibility, effects of land use changes on other environmental issue areas; traffic noise; noise associated with future road improvements within District Plan areas, construction impacts associated with ozone, CO, and particulate matter; AGENDA IT€€d X60. [ PAGE 10 4 car PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008- PAGE 3 OF 3 inconsistency with the air quality management plan; exceedance of SCAQMD thresholds during operations, operational impacts associated with ozone, CO, particulate matter, VOCs, other criteria pollutant emissions, and greenhouse gases; cumulative impacts associated with operations; and long- and short -term impacts related to the implementation of the Third Street Annexation. However, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, which "balances" the proposed project against this unavoidable environmental effect. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve the General Plan Update. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM No. - PAGE '1 0 5 l� (, V] FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes 9775 Businesspark Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92131 April 2008 Attachment 3 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents Chapter Page 1.0 List of Persons, Organizations, and Public Agencies that have Commented or Given Recommendations on the Draft EIR .................................................. ............................1 -1 2.0 Comments /Responses ..................... ........2 -1 3.0 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR ................................. ............................3 -1 3.1 Introduction .......................................................... ............................... 3.2 Errata ................................................................... ............................... 3.3 General Plan Update Policy Changes ................... ............................... 3.4 Modifications to DEIR Figures .............................. ............................... 3.5 Additions to Appendix B of DEIR ............................................ 4.0 Draft Environmental Impact Report: December 2007 5.0 Technical Appendices (CD) This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1.0 List of Persons, Organizations, and Public Agencies that have Commented or Given Recommendations on the Draft EIR The following agencies, organizations, and individuals submitted comments on the Draft EIR. The comment letters and responses are provided on the following pages. STATE AGENCIES ADDRESS State of California Department of Fish and Game 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C -220 Ontario, CA 91764 Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit 1400 Tenth St. PO Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812 Native American Heritage Commission 915 Capitol Mall, Room 364, Sacramento, CA 92530 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501 -3348 ORGANIZATIONS ADDRESS Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch Miles • Chen Law Group City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Introduction 4113 Pearl Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 9911 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92618 1 -1 Responses to Comments Index Commenter Letter Reference Comments California Department of Fish and Game A A -1 Native American Heritage Commission B B -1 -B -7 Regional Water Quality Control Board C C -1 —C -13 Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch D D- 1 -D -91 Miles • Chen Law Group E E1 -E -36 Governor's Office of Planning and Research F F -1 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update April 2008 Introduction Page 1.2 2.0 Comments /Responses City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Comments /Responses Page 2 -1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Comments /Responses Page 2 -2 a C N N MU_ N a1 2 (D >,m �N ��°mm3FU)5 � -oz vino NEwL 3"-o0 -o U >�YO .oM ��c�i �E� >n�nm0aao E sa mov M w 'D Co f0 N C .L... _ N o N � 'N (D o L N 6 oF°-� r La!°(D QM�c°.�U 'oo Uwy NE aMi co 5 N 01 r='NO c -0 N D. N V U c N (n a N O L 0 O _N _CI 01a r_ V O L.. = Y D O N a M d� Q. °� O M prn N O Q 0 N o� -:,-. N -o a>iMa��U�:?wl�= 0 06 cs a0a 3oM m y m N Uo�N LO (D E 3 N C c D °= aNi U ° 0- ° ° N N .°c N T d N a1 C - co L n O N = 2 M M C 0 0— N O O 0 dO 0.0 M.M wy m � 0' 0 m N as1)�vi N y O N C M .° 7 �' W y y W j N N> T `T N —Me > w a m 0 0 a�,«. L F- 0a) t a F_ t F_ °MnNa.n >o�.. ° E M M o U o x M rna xy c M M t Qc w o ma r a U C7 a c y a> w m- > M M a (D J' M aci w N N 0 NN 3 X O QF_ U) �' 0 E '> pw y D O a) W = C 0 om E E °c�_U NM° P � 0y .aE n E m E E 0NNa m . - m M E E °E �2a m U Hc_ S-MO 0 - d'c M O LL M oUw -O -(D2 L 0 m Q ii U U F N Q Q Q QQ Q Q Q Q Q Q o ° e m a m = Z mN - o T E gm m m o 1Qv. aw _ w0 Cm 8 ^m Ea°i m ma 6 mw a$1 ymy rYI lu o. 3 S mf -cW-. m a ra E6 m aE Sn a0 -$ U m 0 i O 3 m C w . m J A_ a C OZ CNc TW °'8m V m q ,L„ 0 a E>i m ° 0 o aQ EdN 00 > °oe° cu 8 E $W, 2 m'° X80 m v �.m0 Umm E 0' �a"m =a 0 ^� 3$ -1 L° o m w b mm m a q 0 omU m U mZ Z° a « m w as am' L U m W X00 mom d nm g P Om b m e va W e J K °m n E02 m cwo ;Qm .= .q c m i m5 m oe U E 0 0 o o a a o 0 m mZO o o m`m ° n w 2`01 $ °O Va m m «° ;L1 oo am o @o m w a m U.i c m3 m n$ « O1 ` a5 w �mc '" o °W v=lmm' ma = m� �°f b e3 9 4 03 u a E °mLD hoc 0'O ° mo 'tL°,'a vN ° mm t0 m .m° 9 °'o m L°.a 0 u'� m E oar.. �O^'E _Sv °m `m wm aR d _ N m O @ °W L``-E m °O °0 W mm 8_ Ce aLC mL.r m 0m .eZ 0 Ut mm C mm u Owm• 0 1p a s 3?H a 00 OS$ 4 "a m m N m a) W 17 W W mO1 m O & Y O V N U U L!-j Q Q M V t0 ID m a a a ¢ ¢ ¢ Q YO N N N N O N— O N N y C C c N 0 0 ° Qj E n. N N �p N c N N 0 N m Q N O co C N O O c0 °- U c Q E C _ N W c oU 0 t E 3 0 U Z 3 O U a N m N O a O = N .O c0 `— M N N ° N ia E=— d c° c° w U c U c N U_ O U �-O .MN N..L, N� gyp, .O ... ="O O °N C O U N U .-. c N N E N N �co > ' c= .5 .92 yj > W O S U ._ N d C N O O d V D O N c L O O_ y U �_ "O N N C c 0 d 0 3 0 c O W O C .J N > > C N a N N c— O U V mm c U O= +-� "NO N N.� 3 N O N d ° ° ° m N U EN° W C N 5° > a °c 0U s 0 aau)0 � a 0a a- M'5 22 c Cl 02 � -E2 V NU)N N jw w O E N OE ID c �E N C 'O E 0 w �N ja °U °Ua > N co V Q Q Q Q c U c N�V � md9 d C _�E m 6Ug wmgp ao cm 4O m � no n Qc °cm w zoa� mw£ cm `m` m E u W cm V " @E m =¢m M m • cm °e m . m »' um; m�cm i n8na 3� o`mER ea , g <g m Qc S 3ENov m : w .m rm a w_a,mm C �. U'mm am 30 Hmm '° U mma 'a m >m� mO_n c e .$3 r$5 om>'m 3 �tmc m u CEO. m ga:m9 LL z m N p > E 0 O TS Q ZWUmn E0 H C �s m m 5a n 3 N c m d N W 6 u LJ N co d i Q Q Q Q U � I C O (6 N C p_ 0 V N 4? O N O. U C — LA N U 3 ] Q U N > j > w p Op 0 0 N _ _ Ew C m m m p E O O O U N N C w N O C N W N N N N O U'- O O O C 2 C C C C U" Esc; E E E EE E E O N U U 0 N M cr CD 0] 67 0] NM ti oi+m�8 Wti E'Rm `a o2 Own ..� 3c'8 m SS s =1O1i .emu WO 3 $�mc °a ° ¢YO 3m act HUM TiKoCpc' L 9¢E $� g ° it tt `0 3a- wm °� ° S r § E app LLZ �s�8 s$ sWm g Q OZ 38arc'Fa Vp. €°dm ci$ E y5 $C 3$.$ °P��o {�°i m_j 8 °4 Ew E$O'Uy= U �Q�ESgt -j Sa SSA g$- $ ° w gg gg OW ggc Sm Ud�ggaE °g @g$ &g3g$ c € an ygt�m9-9Ea Zs 8 3Z'Q o 'aj g. 8- � g�mLW3�g( °� ,rd$m�'yE�p .o$ � 19pwa EE'm'm'E .i �b+�$ °e tm 'E e`o °m 8�8 $:$,EE Z mm °p O =Oorm`. °l9 c °9° o U.If I E = lv fO71 $ �E$O =e`S ie� cw = mn�l -i E °.`c6U3c 58 c g..m ae N E H e UH.s � S m S. tj v =83__ s�= _�$ eat H U 8m.'a��g�So.qE�E}q¢mq BEngBs �=� t§`oe $ S��qEq� S s$ 2ma83°."1 $=6. m �Ty}a� a �, g gig- =a m �h ejp 9 a o� 35­eo d 1 1 Ur i w 0 E .4es All �F=� s'k °EEd 't$S @g'i.g$mmo tmO'£ $•S �_ fi3 =_ W � cp S c IM SE �8mr�- =8tl�ffi m.o 7jaU qEm O °Sa a� mm ail -R IE8$'e�ISa�9Le sg iscc: wd ae^ m �W °� c m pc'm RE�c m g*H�pgE 85 E°��m ES' Sa CmBS R. s =1`06 $ m� =m$°. $12. -- -o gsg NSaC a °$a c [ $0E Q6^ mimo- ..;�$cS _§ pV ao Wa5 2 ny a Um -K3W T.° > g m >O>S r =w wQg ��°c=mm ma >$$3g�o eSEE9oiGiUl Q°eeSS� ~m °O tic g3 o'z- 1��z.m P��@U mg Ed $°Jw°E $'o zs3..S� 13amm >= I II II II I� � r N M 7 0 m M m M m /\ Co co co \ C)0 0 0 0 ( E (\\ o 3 C) ca )78 !�E! 2 9 @E $ d hk $ �� q� |!& . . | er 6\ 9.z \\ ` )f !� - !! 0 \k -m ¢ l FL kk�ƒ B! !calf f 2( /k) /|2! Bel ! � § B! t5 f /2 j / |§ # |f §! �� & %� 2• ) K !� §�. ]i!)! ! �! � ! J! \| ■ ,f °§ | q � - \ •� ��,.l� ! Sty • ■!. �m \ § )� ®2k w as F( \ /22( \ /2) ¢ ��, , . § |I ! || N U C C N m E a E m o U c p N � � c N N .L. N E 4n o m N m m 0 N C d'> N O C 0 m O N N O C C m D. O N t � 3 o. o @ � p p N c N N � L N N U U c �m 5 c m ma rc� T`m w c� mumsD c °� amWOp m V W w°- N j W C N C O m m 0 rW fe m W a -O om _t3•3rO3c c a W c c mo O amL a.Wo. o« mm � W C O m c ao Comm ''OmE o cma a�L m mm c - C.Lm m- O� > W E V c mm - OWm mm � a W U Fp amm �mnmm mnmam Ecm m a $ Om 5-ccar oaNV „m O we =-T m mamc ~c« 0.V-- c -W3 m My Om _m J 0 Ta> w m O - W C- m m m mE _ m 8c o0 OC, O WV mom c rn.ma 9 m m O ° c c t m 0 W m._.0 .0 m.� n or m> m 's =•, °o R�' E.02 o,m W m n°'m.mz,8 Om�mumim _ �Mm i. m£ c 9 �' c m c� � �' W W 0 m• °�° n n o tO L m S ♦d.. C aEa m we W O m@'W,- !� LoEmt vr�g�rmW W d % O x0y.n 8.c o U> m 8rnm p�U°n MC 0,3:0 0 mMVyOmc L9yE xmp Y' o €- �3- pp Y C 3 W m_ 0 t cm- 3 m K N m '.0 m° m O W m m m W eID gym'j h� MU D« Om m Tc 8. WE`m EWC IQ� Er UO m 923:- W gnxg a Ow�m O a 3 °c m a g K o m o m m win c g o m w m m cm x 3 8 v 41 SOD A W �o mmmm cm ED -r,= °' mncNE «wmwEmacac a m JO mw °aE £ °ooQS K mcWQw -Memo MO. c o Qw mn W a Om d5 t °a v'«3 cmEm mxEmo °n�90 a $.gym« m--� -w ° R� 1° Z2 W W m tm m m W ct ary mm m o a n>�osmM U 0W WU LJNW«m m owe y W.MM.M jt`r mUmCmm i0.@ d iN`o minor �cOc3 m W o cm8 W m- moomm- UO”' Z m._.W wL; o QOpmL o; na m'E O W cNQ 2 WL•v ui W m rnco« M `m O0 m m n nr W Er.` ti O T'N CU O� > CCm Omm� -.�� COWa> LrW nC0m0 O VEi �. a U0m0 ux15 mom 0 60 T iC nrr30W JC m`o >a La o$rcn� Eg,�8co c s� W^- - °c 9v o "mg -° WQ m mn0!`8 maW'aa v KO'W�nm E�cy.. W��Wm m`m NW uw q;2W - D%gm > wem�10m om$iAm'�m0 os Q¢Z `m w°'im W 2�cc Q Oc a.-a.c m «oma ca58 W o=•�om (Y/ e�z u. KU�J OU' O fLra�U mU naUm Q I y N U U ca c- oN°- ° Nm @ 0 O c° N @ c am d.�Uw W -aN O.m -.�> C (6 N -C T 3 c0 C U (0 -O pif 01 C a C@ a) 0 0 U— ° c c ' @ N NNc Ea) a - @o O @ a) U Q O N co 3`0wm03Za@'�omma _ m N C O.J o N@ N 0 0 a C a@ ID U N U Z 0@ U@ 0 @ > @@ C 0 ac TO m�-o U .. :f]Up Y D N @0 E ? a c.N o3t .L.. N Q y L- 0 O C C c 0- d Z5 cu) E N a m -52 @ o `@ `o 0 Y Z)M0u. m-0N mw��am m @�- mNrmn @- W U= W 3w W' ca' >a aU m =L E O> N 0 0 @- N c V E fn N O O a 0 O@ 0 N o'- 61U O, C O E N c w O@ m@ a O d@ 3 O E U� C w.. O a a O c -a - N a a= L w -002 E a O L N LL h cc m ooC) -(D V E 1 o NU- C U w a0'DWa c =m �-E< U' omT�a.m m @o`�N 0 0 �0U) a0-0 ZEwUa _0 O N U 0 N t0 m v LL m m x f o c .U�a0y.3 o m a E m O aU o a M@ m d> o @c @�o,.: oa - moa�m @u1 rnm m E m °m mU _E 3 a U w m 0 @ v m 0@ 0 a a) -03ID0oE�jwm d > W 0 a d U o 0 0 o a> 0-) O >> �o 0- 0 L 4 rn ow , �mxEo'= C'Soc°��E a ° E.-,3 m o-a ID 'O E N (� �.a E N a-0 @ U U O)V — c @ j, m `) E O x-00 O r U "0 am) L E.> �� O am a@ O N M 0 wa a@) aacoma0)i0ima3 N@ O@ 2 N> i0 OC N@ E U N 0y-N°cm3pmacica) °QED N o o a).. � E 0 m 0 0 N `o w .mC c0 N`L-' a0. >-C a w N�a F3�;3�a@@ aUm C O C O U vl @ M @Lw `° c= m M m vi c L 3L a NCwC .- c.3CYam(D L O O-L @ O N C N> 2� Q > m n w CO @ @ O) @ O C Z O ri @- -- �' w @ N 6i @ @3 a) 3 5v o)E 3L N W- a) @ y -p O 0 @ 0 U � 'c ID 0@ w C (D _@ 0) N@ O .O U ..0. a 0 M @ a a C 0. > N N a c a O @ O M 0 o E@ 'm0 N> O =� N T t6 U @° a = a CO = C O 0 c a V) IO a 0 C U O N a)° 0 N 0-0 N 0? L N- 0 C 3 o L E= m m Ma) aEa 0 m-Fo U .. U E L E 0 0 0 a0. O W N= O C N@ L> w a p 2 Lam.'_' 0 ° a) @ N- " . - - 6 N ID 0 0 C 0 N j c o o @ E N N m m•m 'm> E a o -O 0 s U m � 3 E a m _ > E O w° m N a C a(D F (0J M U We m c any cY'y c mm Kc .-c m>�KN a. ... m C c 6 c 0 L W C W O— m mot„ a to p m 0 y 0 0 0 m C U C 2 2 0` ym� L_ q O a m >m9 ~$p Cii ,COp��N E 00 Zia W«dNl�m otm TF= `C 5 m� v' -cm m 2`�'« c cm o mmL omJ `o_ Bi0 m m >ELmdy oU y`om n,�m E O' am am"o'o m'a C`W .c �cmm 'c en ornm y:0pc-,& 0 m «c 's3aocm EEH co .- c 3E@ =m; m 0 3mF a C m V 0 O W 0 O W 0 >i O o O m d"_' > 0 W m 0 m 0 0 W C 9 W 0 0 m M$ 0 JO mC O1%-' O.O-m OCHa3m ECW = L n_ om° cy��JC 0012 0O2`m u.. oOC.- om0m WoaoiECm m �c m cm--'6 c c �Q �O 0"m�0._ mfio ca >m -aci >. >3mEc =Jm0�c3 'yy�� 'mm� ��3cmaW 2E 'C M m�m-W oa 'oO Em -09 6Emm W2. aUP -m W -mWa"O mo 0 G E 0) .cm.Omcmm mmm���o3mn10m -'m`ac�Lm..mvm cE�uJ+m �m @" 2 3 m 4-z- W. o m L W C MT m � ocm Car .-6 - m 3m�mdUE -_aEmE sv2i3ZLmam 0 cmmmc9otC mod ��oo occ .-mama «>.o�mg 0 .- W m °W!2 �v- ,Cmcc.WC Ea 0 V m 10 m C m W m m m m C 0= J z E ; m"` m o g d` m a« c m m" M=, cam cc09 am '°Lxmmm c1°0 10 °cadnmoo 0jr., W «Emo x� c cm�i T'c >ooEm m Wino @ °'oo�U' m3a mcmU -ccL .ywao=mmom ma me 0 >m >mm9� 100 E....Jm'mL_`ov Et`�m2 �m 00 c m��.- «MA $c 2 0to °c=Mc mE 3�°ao�0 O-c omrn r..4 wam�'zmcci Wy�mM- 00---d o rtE rn2 W C�OLm 0 P.M me, y�d0 r00UrpJm Via, 00Z` ,tj O"O.L..'�c W'O p «PmEEnmm nu � c 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 m r` C 6 W m m Q a,- O p C O. O 0- m m W O L 1>. 7 LL Ci NCO .9cmur 01i mmamrn3 om`c "v a) mmc. axm Wa wmmc>,�1p O' 'm V to rRV1« o0 -amv5 m Env OO- @0013 - O- c,.t°n2MW °mSMM -o omm v@ 0=-§ m0m=`ov O> wme cYi m- °°'gLOcc nmc m�>o.c to AV`r000,m °c mji NCa1CJL'C .-Wm mK CN ma `r Cm LVj0.L9"F m��0«WL OmO im US Cim�oo W2 eo)�- «E a� W do U' .t Qa ..mm m m c. .c>-p MW O L T_W m W W W C m 0 > 0 m m 6 W C E 0 C0c 000000 W a W m10 'm'� Wpm m00 �m W a10C m V tonm W m(:i«OLm 0� 03: �t>0ianmmn° F10- '0 «c3�tno`Omw Cu -L* mamcaJOmmmm °mW 3= L N c M U $ v u? U U Q U U m w e T C 0 n p @ -Op Emp -cN-o U C 0 s v o m 'Cmma'o �.Jc a°cwm� =gym O m o C, m C_ a 0 a,N0 LL 3 L m c o p0 t0 N = @ a) 0 U U @tqL 0 a m o tOa�N @01. c C u w N >, U (D) E.2w C 0 m ._ N O a0 n c @ m 'C U m m c Ma,w ENNCNQ -O C r `p- 00 C1 O N @ J 0 N m Y L LL N N m O C d L��`0OO EUcn @¢ ca yEU� 'cc m m > 9 m o m> E a L m d C a@ N m y o U v�'Cml -L333 N @ _L N C 0 C (� wow N2 o N C @ mU o ca W a - a n o oJU Z N w N M U .L. c U 3 0 c m N N N � m m > w ya a��i3v a m m N @ @ E O N E " p n U O J wa °w Fm -a v M'c U U 3 a�O N0o 2) W=) L'3Nd� 0.0- (°-a E oa - U y��7o @ L E a o a N O 6 7 +N w @ L @ 3o v� �rn�aia000 d _ r a p n 0 E N a) �N ��$E�onwa�E N3 M m + aNimc °ems a�mco -O @wccm0 0 E-NO �D O.N a)o C 00 a) n aw o E J a OEo N `o `o ' 3N... cm a) o n E y-p c C co ` a 0. m m wcN'N 3_53 E°a)'D Empw o 3@ Ec\i »>>dU c D pEa@ (D j� O0 y N 0 C a m `OO �N.€ ? Q m E Q U o W N O V U 0 M � N Q flU Om.0 a M CC a, @ o (D 0 o ° co Q o W - a) V O'm0 C =03 P.L-. u-0 N3 U �aLLV p �? o N a.... aN @o-a3wcco"c¢o m❑cy U@ca00om Ec.3mwmrnwY63nZoW �3o'Um°� U$��co'"n. a Y °o- ° 2 C@ N a U a� ca a c N w> E° 16 >N 0 M oocmmLO'aJOoCID O'pa) -0EU aci o tO C n'c ._ E a) nco ono. c'- °-J 3CU1 � m aNi a-° -° N -c= 0 3._- 3 -6 w-o> o'@ p o c m m- QC N 0 m a aNi� 3 a' w E'er'- m �2 °Ewm° °0m @ @Cm�y0a0z� 00 ca am `m NV �E @ @fl�m�- n°�owm.j°i-6u 20 0(D0 �7 p- 0 n N @ U N C n �= N V N N m p- m m N O^ C N m, =n��-amco @mE�m �a�Ew c=onm.c33o $ q LL z oCmm N y v m a FO C m m n O ym w m m w m - C m C U 0 a m a.o 0. -0 1 m J a m o w myc =E Emm E _.- o m- tm m V m t.c fn� � m D °dV n '-a Oa C �.-2 OZNC O � Q- 0 -m N O 0'y m> E w m- . 9 O Z -6 a Q= V U m - 5 n m 3 co m c o m m> B« o w m O a m m m w v=i c 3 a m m m m m a m 3 c w m C v mac mca wUm m m o s u a E .mm-mhao `Lw cc m ma -rn' -m a 3 m t gym ' Y� cc m o m m y m ` N m L � = o Wv w mLmAS� C Po mCOm mmm °C C Nm C'cmO am0 0 dNa m c Qa ca >m -C>>3E> 'm m joy 3 a m c � m� --a Nam. W oa a _ww O w mc g= W3 w nmnmU m aa E �° C 'Z m � m ym U w m $ � M cco ? m (m x 24 H gad ?commm 3 m N �= a m 6 O 9 6 m� 'o o mL ' , o oa mc'cO m$ wmL b =oca T0 ° m voc a% mcot Ma ° m � _ C w �'m ^0 ym`mJam aL=Nm IE >oo °m o0 c!m3m mN 00 3W �o'mQam Mm WM -0 '€gmc c�0O 3�mE= «0 °0 c _Lmc _,0 �mE °S ac m rn m m 2° cm°°2'E M _C', .5- M- £mm�mm mm``a mo � �m0w o�gm 00 o2 ~uE p m 9 C m m O J m y r Q O- O t m m t "O m m L J w ppp 9 m�a mO mu m iEaccm c$w m0 m ESL _CT 0 e Gmm aIM0 m 3 �ma 2 m "50 n oam EU- 0 °a 9 °m$ On 2o! Q m ib 0, 2'a sm 0,� � 'm a N > Ls L ma`mK Lom W > d L wm a m£oN r " 0L aa E ' o Em e u W m 5 q a m c m 0 omc o>nv °5oo. m @s cm W>.wcw Q� w:E gw2°m,`mi oLE o`cac nq� mw 0 O3� (lmmman'c Ha «c3 mfq�wwm.� CII -3�m °gym mO.mLOmmmmW 35 I I I i t I I I M 7 l0 �p m w a m @ cf) s F 3 o c n m E 0020 m-' m�ornm3 L 2L mamx cao0 m.«'L°',FcU.m'0oa0 y 0 L@ a� 3'2 - t Y °c� w C 0 y N_ m om- @ U) m- 0 O@ O cw 0) a. p)3 m - L O@ _@ O c- L C y Y a N orC m�w a- °i @MEw_o.02K - Wma0�Do0°?Um_2- U D @ m m I m= p- v1 m U L N @ m L p N J @@ @ O O M o w C I O m O'c a'd'o -p @ C @ N 00 m @:o macc� @ I co t0 Wn (� aCN ED M= m ObC m N m m 'O 0 03 c3 @oo m ° nc 0 E 0 o 0 0� 0E E c -0 w° M a c L= C Cum= m O-N Y d - m3:n Ed... Y e U @E o@om@ Y Ua ca p o n U = 0 a-o w (D 0 O m ma �m-pw mom -°200 mE 0 W m �m �'- Cwcny3 C> O C - M-- o w - Ev= mo`mzq +-U.p o Mm lr2U a2 M6 c 70 m f11 N@ U N N O U p N F 3 3@ Z@ U s U 2 o WE Q 0 0 0 2. cac`tNc n v'�cw m C w LL C m C qya w m c U y a m cJc v m � mm � wN Ao O> O U 3 Q - 0 L c 'c w y Ob m °m - w o0� c'w `o ° J� °J 9c w o0 c c -m m > > E U HRw -01 V w -ya2 N m O :ETc 0 'C�m =oE �Z� w w a a w ' m .« te m Ca m � N > U w m c m C _w - w'c «' m O N o 9 = m a d o ry w m O ww V C m gtf° ca a c w £c _$nm 9 > c wc m rn n tm 0mo cm 0 moM C m O a o T mN« wm m « °°na0m V om U m m'N O°m � c ° Onv n o a v U 3 mwmanc $ c m C b .l N � � U$ U r o _@ 3m00 mm m 3 E a@ m Co c L N a Y m w O N> 01 °�L c d C p m w 3 N C CO N y= X U O @'O t O c 0.- 0) �d m N y m a c m m 0 a m° U@ o J c°p Q p E 0 E= tO N Em— rOn � .0 -00 E .L+ 04 a m @ N >. O m .,�, O> m ..m. m m w m n> C 3. U O@ J J C 3 0 ��Qan oL �� m�'0 m s @a N m .-o o �3 0 nm aN � ° cr +onL w nT O m -p 0 : m �o °3 E0 @ C m ' o 0 0 OC 3 m mfl ~c @oi aw E >m E � n 0- ca n .D c X Ly m mm . 0 O O m o N (D .2 w J 0'_ .mU o = o- C@ ° C Co (m 6 3 m 0 m U m0 L Eo O @ c @NDJ v@ m E m� - N V ' > O C6 .L m@ m ri E m E a N 3 tm 6 ,v_ N C 0 m m U m a m c« 3 i gyN N.F mmt.. mmEmo oi5 N= L,O o w C O w 0 g "g "3ac` €Em Y C o'er cm- oz, o.s .tm.. nvm30 °0N'o 3> N O N m oCD b"a cm E oE,c_ 0 c c o- �:; > C O m E c= C CO wM.0 m w .00 Em U'mnEc3 ,c-'E - oo. -roa_L 3n'°mOmm' ^E �E"mmvENaE�- m N « w w a U- y m o O rN b - C y°j C w m m ° tN 0 m cN o c '°c o m o m o E" w=6_ 0 0 o M w0 + m n c o m w M ._ Ms ry U m _u C o m mm o d Z5 RL 8.52 �• w Nz-a X ^ twnw U,tJ' -wm J_m Eac me «0m `Nw,L m(7.3w0m@cem nE .5u0`- ''�o0'3 N m C w w m LO '$m C EWnW ' NO C tll J c m w mm K cw o m'm aTi NNm a Fv` «w M C u 3mul°mw 9. U w W m pwj '-C�ODm mC i E m E m w w now «E'� w n 6 N O m °vmmc Ea m E c m mw' O Z,c .O `loom s n t c 0 MU «0cmvw «f0 2LQ1� w a V W N °0V m�CQ o�n °a n oa c oo3 aw �°a Oa n .2 r m N'c OEM m t- >? o m ._ _ m c w M y a O m M n EN 00= ' °cdwE =w 'd' O .m.. Z a ny w' w° b N Yl w W z �N nN'o �F U'Qa« ^m ° 0 W t w y m O m OH 32m3Rm U m TQ' a mSW m m U a w o m« O 0' mt N,p m9 C W J m w mom 3 � m 5 rn m o d °c E tm 0 o , N J m « m c °-N o- Mo,F W 0 C'O'- O C C w m.ctcwmmw oa J C 3 w m as w U wum.�waOmMOM M m` U 0 m N c@ Z w w c D n m G C N C m N ° L mmw(90 «a- m V m CL E_ C CO m CCw w ^N O m w t b m w Em o StuL 0 Z 00 C L w m 0 E 2 0 .. «Mm nmm °0 32O=m 0- 9 C 0 ^w - 0 2 N N« m m q- D> m C c w 0 C T N a 81- 6 c`C N O N J m L a C O m m iC_fnm �0%L ronaoci V N N CJ :590 C m vv n ma'ogommmmw m U 5 0 v L F m a 3 Uf P m aLL m$ h% m n me am V m am iw ¢w Ex m m J m m 3s 0 v v r� U c 0 C TL m c N @ O U C p' O� O 'O O C@ N >~ @ C) N �nM .c N C p N NU N 0° U O - ° ° C C O N j C T U O f ° Nr °a o ° ��3 = ° c @� a°y w � ° o- rn ° > ° N 2 N ,@ c @ U ° m 0 O) C �L p C U m d O o E O�tl c ca T C 9 wLw-H"O_�c Om-'.• Y- a cc 3m L y C @ N -U "U N N N° a) o a)~ o •r � �Vi �@ 6 >@ oaoN�@ ' S O O L 3 C° o 0 0� ( m E @ t ¢mV op a o o rn ° a> m ° a N� o °0 y��rc 76 'a M0)00iEmE (m� CO m N a m N C a E N O N O0 ° N N C T O N 3 D °N ° O N U V p 0 O C@._ N O U O m > O -. U Oc > - @ 0 C) i > @ > a!-� y a) � = 0 m m @ ° m �o N O @ @ N N N D w >m ~ 'Ea Em— .0 D m � 0� 0 @ � � 0 p DN O w N y U 3 m O OU N ° ' .- U y a Q N @O C m@ E Z O > a O @> c rn U @NO V C @maWw.- cU-°1 L� Mai -0 0 O@ O N °pO M=o@3- O mn- -� � W3 0E nCOa O LL Mcon0) @ X o a°�mY � O = (Dc@ a �cQ L@ �OCm o�� O� °> woL9 � p a °m E o vow O m o a w co3T.@ @m@ @°m 0 � a .—a, @ a rn o o C0 m � O ° my m c c a- o @ v 0 c c 0 . 0 @o a M N ) � > m c d t L 0 LL 0 > N NO E a) cm c c. 6)o c w E @ E Z o f rnn m Cl) m � 0 ��m @at@" — 0: a E U U o�m ° c __5 @ 0 m 0 ° � oO o 0 O L @ N ' ° a) 0 0 U) a) O O L aU 0 U N 0 N 3.3tiwmu p oavocw (D w . ) nLnU @-oC�� r` ao U U r a > wa ° m v2`c wF u Zw . ns °d ' .`_-w. • n° O w °' WCen ma cyOc�V£aa �em La -°yv tc cu�m-m °mm 0 V v To~ w 3' -No'� w�mmm m m mE ° u E' aa.s> avw coi E o d 0 H ° m o m w c C w c m M �m 3C LY v cc o v° M m O mo 7L w °m m� MS �h�Eaor � �E cwmmmv�w08 c mmn mw o w C a° mm U 3 C= cc m G m 0 a a 6 O U w 0009mm m3m O -0m E etT a g°� 3`� d wwom�m a ww3 a cot w_m uw a$v o > @ cmc w �moam'y c°a._ a E m 6 1 V w—> <° W�`c. o c Off m aa 16m v vw `w c m o m ° >° u . m e° .0m., vo o c u m w >m _ Ca).O � N' E m c w v = o 0 " aca c ~ aEoowcC O w N W � c _ w C C Z O H :C Y N u t a- wt °C Z C N , m G i +E 0 d o v3wamvw ° vw2m- C N° H :=0 88 m 0M'_ 0 EU'U Ec ya wg c @ca o�� y a E = oiccayvG.S ° v cM m oa �° s R A E o � --Co, a 3 y v � C4 aai? c7W_ caw mm0°mm o3mo2o W� ^cw m� JZ a cv mM M`5mr> t `U 3 e --. 7��mm ci E j d@ m m °o ' 'mc°°mw0oao Ja �$wco'o m •9 . mio"@O, ,r^ymmm-'. ' w . 00%c 9Eco waow = dg om wm v°ay Ea.mao°-ayc, wac_cmacma a a L" ` °d m_ m°Y mm=w 0c�°w Uma m=w w o dmO>w Lmyyr� m O°°£`_ , oK y2`�c °m vcoImym °9opo aA � gms o an °L � >; omw' w y 3 ` a (j o - w o e v d a 0 .- w>> a m v__ it mR . ow0° 3 " Svmw v$ y 2 Va=m o t c 0C.°�°o cm'R� - � ,9 - 5 co3 ccp ^ d' n Ra5 -6:5v w°aCro c „ aa0 E� tw >c w m ao z=- i w It2 M"2w3 � aE m °m � E m� �E waw �"_ ac Z)oE mac m a aw E M K o °_x W m Poo ?Ndroc_wm t - w 7 - 12 ° c a a > m 0$ i w m E A p m o E EL 0 -65 2 a 0 w 69 w w m M B w a U° R O r w w r d z O .S 5 x ` cli C4 ° rn o U U U U h — EOzya) m�0E a: xa �mo M5ui ��'� 0_° w 3 �p d N 0° N C C ? U1 0> N W w N a.° @ a'f0 L a)p (� m U O rte- 3 C'0 a c o -f0° 4r o@ E m mcvw c �E m-`o o d �`o= mw _a cF c NmM jaoma5o �a�owm�N,��cEm�d��c 'ioN�iri°-t_c� -pNU0 ='_ `-CO 0 0v-O m ar cf MO 0 Er `� 0 3-0 �" ° d (D 0 Oo m � E a W -0 i I E 0& a aa Nw ) 9 wN U C N C m �afOJ O O m L �y - U> E" 0 �OV a ] N>m o ° 0 ° f aa'o (D � N r V �VC o C N C ccW m `o nO C o 3w W °.? ac w a- C c -O o O Na o 0 ad � m a O° o N 0- N� E N O O E C �m � n � °`° "-°6o °°aN � c��Oo ° O m > ca C �w _ E ° Nn m c c N 0 > N L N E: 0 � a DN a) �� c > CO > E (D EcW° C( W Ea 3 IDa)E00 ' a E dm NE< § O j 6m n_ E.� o° oc� wm0 -a a0a t4 ff o , °E mO M ° c E N U O 0 0 n iN o ° a ON N N c O N C � N a U C d 6 U N c 3`Y 3 Mc 0. O(D> 0 L o om o NLEN°riOC L W a)aa) co " Y0 Oc Ew5 NN m 00.9 -,= c �cO.�° -0a) 0 CCO E$UVWW xcc a am.� OncoEwm -m �m 00 (D � � � 0'6'5 a). On'0 d X03 m mco O > > . a v=.- W o °='N c ° a ° c an m O a' Ca n a) . j° N 0 c O Na am = a>-O @ aC° N n N Z O N O O a O O O N ca 2 ` c rns 0 m`o�@amY� `oma1 ° U o 0 o > E c0 U O a n vi 0 c rn C � >.co a E (D OP o0O a m Eo °ma Z. d °v0a, 2 Ea ,&=m ° w a r E0 d € „ o =°N �dL a =VV,v N N002IN y< 20W COmy s mm'e� O.=0s : -0-00 0m00 mEi .; 2 ig2Q..0 8 W p a 42 (9 C Ny V m ?m � 3 d OC c` mO? md dZ m mp.oOMO0 m d O O m d :5 d m >° a U C m g C . . E C m --ME ° > m m - ,3I a8 ::s-`0= °' c d a ow q 0E � cma v mm E o O'° W 0 a M , v 3E _ ui m 0 a d m m c E 3 o'a E i m g E N m c m Q mm ° m oou°n = p-cc _ ca. $ tw° �m cm�cau . �d °A:(7 mE o ..°�. NOryr NOYmNC ^ V 2 O V�1.a 0 12 0 M O R O q d T m N O a= md ay ; ,c j -°.O q CJ C = U 0 _Or0 O-d w 0 E v c (i N m E c 73 fO '= O�`1cr3 mm -'t°c .'_t N «rm250 `Y g n S q 2 cp °Eco' o GE^m > -E- .�yyC wdO°y. _% . "wd =00 om o'od ; do > nO:0 an d J � m m v a m ia nOm�E °_, =M 0 oO va M Kc? 0 E �U- . __1 i� E E -y> e °�� yo C4 1w `cc .'vU ¢C d __ °cL o �dqC'm"m "OmL p Vy dwc=00 I � OaOa wmH �GC pO �Y°N w � =W u= "aCm5EJc a _ O m c N N G 'C l d J m w 00 K d o mC0mdq> L'id dma"i roV ` 'O ,r aMO Nc Est °d J= "O .NOO m N -00'T ; C mU'CG 0 NL9 9dCE�°C m2CV 0' "o v (O t anmd mdC W�d dU �y w p 00000gdC d' O Ww •md UCd n N sNo'E I9 ° 7 OL Ud-J O � U mLV6 U O JOdJ Om- G�1 ,fYE L oO. dm dQ dG � CSZ A>NCC M rd a O T � O C- a. c "E m c m a. a E c 6 o a d m C 0 o 0 V ° E °o > W m z Eo O v W m 0O 0 m >'on >0 -M K 02 w CC 0 md a N m1d N 2UO = 02=EV mi 2�ZU57 Ex cwi w w U 00 01 a1 N m w> m O O C .] n m L ii N_" E `1 O .. m N M-.- O N a a) a) 0 m O. c 0 c CD N c S U w w C O Qao-E 3-wo E°nmo� °.°.0 2 (W n -o aTi- w c (mico Cfv�cm�6Em wm�m �- E m U U m a) m m w m w> T C° w O a (D 0 c °mow cm�0oa.m y�N 2 > c 45 U) E > °o n oE�a� 3� 3 O E mN Z W y N 5 33 m 0 d m ° m0 c > o ° c tOi-1 m co [0 `� C a V U "' Z N m 0 U `O Mum w a) d .w. U m N a) m.wE'°a`)mo °gym o °nCLL L�a0cc m o� C c' o 6 � 0 0 > E o wU ow .- Om m o , N- M m N w N E 'j - d.3 r m m j 0 w C > y 0 O N a c c w , m N -° c m - 0 U N n • UC °- ' ° O ° N U O m O m T C "° m LL a LL 03 °w E N 0 t E 'd m JO O p w 0 tf w m- a 3 F S C- � S U U O n2U°a>'O 0UU) ia o -o ° u= we E m wLL o°0 m° t o o '0m -O° w3°iZc o -0 amc @m on mdym0c. -mac mw m o w c M 000 r.@ oirnc T m (D a x w m °m. c L '--L o m N 4? ° C 0 ..: O o o °owa0 ��Q>om m U = 0 E' o ca V p w N E N ° N m � ri E c w n m nu r s v c$ E 3 tnn 0 U i3 U E m = 00 N �+ d� o �-. c 0 M0 co aa o a o5 E��� x m v Ya Z3 m W`° -o ° °y o d a c a 0 W a€ a $ m aQ w NmN Jp OO �, m Mir W aOm� S N y'O O KC v00W— o im m M< M o6 . 'am2Ea E o 8- �- 2 moc?mm noCD'Zy3OR M =Cc m voa . - FL `m aV° -�mmma ov os `m wtd m�mmOm�_@ Smm0CL Oi gw3Co -Mcc 'm' ddcmw=;: .°>_°�mL3 a3" m'ai -- ,cmv rnmx -W m c EmoK > MO. 2 e Eomm9om ocL.; 6 mWNm Coo d y'Om m' -C O -Om -m mmE m`¢C 7a to D`o _oo °cvmomn�y 9'mmmo. 0'a-00- am ym mv3`om EE Mm mcm'"cEE m e j moEp mL y0mm'C mi-cc� ~M E-0 '5 —= om_cv °w H.v nma'p>,N Q3e cL... _ydcc c'mmc '600 o'S m8 moc mmi $EoUomc c v 9�omo.- .�>'oi c�o�aam ec06owo v @¢._ct cm nmZ bo o O y wO,V 3mYLL mw _'Or :°. d L WC cOLCN�O wm--O ...0 t mom w2 mrD 9N p $m x mm Om_, -OEUcU 4 0E E m m m m m-c L l d m 3 Z O m- ; J gf a a OI 10 `O ° •'L' U Q .~�. > EO 0--s -o dmm>. tonal V °' m M, C'&m cc - c�!Aa 3@ m v Y 0 G.02 0m?._m0 -cm w c00 a 3m a .- m=='Om��m c'l >sdosow�E nc AwvE3 nmt��m aw SU.`.. om, vm'om0 o3mo$ m o Ej-823w 7imm d 3 0 n c ( w c ac@ o$mm d�3 �- Emm'�• L�et ocdm CCa c c� 0 Ou >y— ON >W mm m O 3u2c O 9 � c vm m mm 9 a W w ti `o al I.S t °0x a � Yo E m d d0 mO m ° 0a �; �m wet O oS ' WY m ° w° N E d m Y tQO a Wd -6 O LLmc Z � 0d WS m m O m E 2z (O O c W m m s m m w c o o CErY o> y c o e w a N C 03 L 'me aJ o mU O h -6 00 N'�mO m'OO = C N? O a m m O a yw- g o$mm>mmm Davx mw }o�m @ E 1-a " $ ¢V a�o`o oo E a cd M. v ° .6 Ea m° L m W E E m a. m E c a m x= n m E° c Lo ws oc ?c 0 m° moWm? m Smt - 4 s d0m v ° Wmc �o?� >tm ° E ccm d.ov Km maan`o= LCE fE Z`� 0 0 122 ? z 1 - -_ �cl; �� I m I` I �C4 ro rn _o U U U c� _N N a) L C N co a N 0 E o y E aa)i 0- � o� o� c a `m � m �.� � °'�i. am) M 3co 3c mE3�CDM c.`- 'c"viNN a)EN� Nm �ii a)'m 0'ya �y3`°o wwa)ZM 0 °p'go�c ENm�EEy cEW =c m p�ma�op U'2 2 0 U° c o° o� au S o_ m o N 0 m w° c 0�� N m)� 0 0 � w o E a a aa"0 y"osmwm� =mNm m>.�`mw >a mxmc.�O�o3�c�so =m mD o a • ' .)`L0 0cm°n n " Z cay�n w N uC ci amrn p �.luat? — amai O N 0 C m 0 cd C ° L N a7 - N mo N Lw .a.mi. Ldo E E � Z O N c m o o ° .°w ° m� =' LU°J )a E o) Oam nE X_ -a ap° om m mo ae o QtoEaC ° E E m-O N N m�ao c ornW Nm o Z Z _ U LO E U l6 O O N m MO L O O N m O N a) + N 5 s c) 0- LL C a) T � C Co LL 11 U 0 0 0 ° F U E a — iY m m 3 O Y O c m � U l N a O oaWowN o w o0ao D �m M 0) 0 � N 3 0 m.0 30 7 3 M= 0- 0 ooccOo. C ° macmrm O C N 0, w a� 0 NT�d« T L -r N a) .N 0 m m O�O-N G c a T� 0 ii w MO a) E E m 4) `0 o o c--N o 0ooaE o Eo m0 0a) OOmoaEm 0 _( N N Z E E +aN O L O w m . m C wo J � v `°om°°c � c`m n� mQ n?maaic� w- Ym�aT,. @0.��w manw.°��Emm� caE3mcm)c �`cmmOmNmNL�mc3 New ma m a c m 3 c° c 0 y m o m c a) N a c `m 3 3 � `m C7 L L a3 @ c a) m Co N U t6 m T O> � E @ E U C N N -O N O) N w. " C awm�cmi -owm�E�mE�3- ouIEaaa,..: LrLE._ °m =E�03co°)ami m- 0 0 c m. 0 c= o N O w` m a m m L, aci m a `m o o m c F N O 2.2 U cm °a)w cmc°�o`�Ea�i� =��rn 0a=i in� 3�aiE 0EQ�3 > >mcoW��0�0 N L C L N N L C° O a) N m N L X X m m E 0 L O m C° O O .c m J m X N w Q--- Q.- -- 0... a). a 3 �� F- m ma CD O Ow ow_ ma OLa U U U U o m 2 n «m m m mET c cya 63 ti OOO1 m « 9 SIR ti m 9 E d N N O V C m C Q U O V 5.5; m m E �- c m 0 � 0_ a = Q m m rn o 3 mEE c'c� c;c'o °o . -M-M °3aa E° 7928 cEEamc)gcm w=c w Inc ° p0 0,� p Wo' m .wCmw «Tm m m mwCE �m 3 .W • °°E~m .a` 68mI°W > 0 O 0 O d mom._ 0 N mi-3 'cg m rn',o a� o om - o OOmw_9 o >@' m E " o 0 c a t c m 8 c « X Dr 0 m cmam Y cc'�my%3 mo m p v o O u ° m m� m =om aW m E m 3 7 ' 'd E o m c EIV C m a 0 m y O m w � b O . V C _ � N Z J 00- o V O O m m m 0_ m m« d m 0�_ m m y i 'E c w Z a O 0 N O m O m p? O O m 0O _. 2 U;w ._. gN mo o A o 4V`to mmU ° y�3gc m$ m . =mom o �a° = N m „ m° == Y E-2 cmm �.60m, oE 3 p EW- 0 m mW m E �Noo oc o ° t m m m 2� m a E a m Z. 62 m ° �w N c i , ti Q U w d O ati e C E m l 8 e comW�3 O 'mockw owoh9�m m mrn5�m tra-oi m 3 UI'c NU K w t F w' 9 y m w T L77 3¢ E o' m 0 O. p�j m C O J 10 -r-�- O m m m --� Y pp� L m O m E m 6 m m 0 0 0 j L m m N m T O w C m m U I-2 mJV-�U �mN «.06t.. 1-w� H��m=- - `E m O t c N M I p Y M o = = o w 0 -00 w O w 0 a N >' 3 w a) .L.• 0 U w U Y Zn N, w m .'-T' N -U -p 0) 0-0 c w =L O° U m3a7wUEpm mo LLJC �� o n mdr -no C-WL 0 :D > __ ma) 0@ •"o .- C C N C Z �-> L ..T• (o C 0 Sa c t° m �w w e�°'-a m m`° cD,o c awi E m na` ui o d mm 0 0 1 Qo`o aci y `- 5 c7FD 0 � Eot m u o.� UL @ZN wZn .w.a4) (6 aum 00-O Q=.m�T��� �C3 .. m a m U C a-00 0 w m O O a d 0 a) a) a) p co W t0 i1 ° mm o16E_mm �03yw(Dv��Eg 3p� oa- .t0• pj L cf) w U- C E w o Ca T� 0 M ap)-c-z m ov a`�ydNco 0- rn- .°cwE�c �mado I- C7'ow -0 OM >>,,�- 6aa�a� > -3E-00 N ?' .t.. M- N N ` >° ° ° c o ccoo o > u>+i N � -m0 0 > O Xr > n- TN cc m o m 3 m o ° 0 0 a m°m w 0 N C - y o m m w ° Z`.�o o = M m c -- 0 ° ` d N m m > u U L N LO U .V 0 a) �.. N N ow a 0 N ca < (o N C c i [o d E$ o> d O a) a) .._.• L _mc@ � .c'Gmm m ai z co0y 0 �>uw 03aioww0a (D a Uo � �� N O O m m � d N o C ON ° y - Q > w N �a w �m°wOf w SUm3i E m 3 6�.0 a M r C 0 0 02 N S m m m m E .2• m c$ Omo W= 2' �o.Om °ci -$moo N TO °�u�oz um. my E��m mp9m mncm �V >� m a3 um 2'NNO mO �Ot„O,m OC o�aa N �x �xE ccoi �� nc(7�O tjm = E 6Z V` rn c � m 0 E o c 3 m m m _,o e _ Eo.o t^pflmo ° 5 E Eammmco wy-o0 m U Q C > C m L.. T m m 0 0 A m V m 0 N 0 -C N� m tmm 7Z tmggm c� C • m ® m�° ^ 0 mI ONm m � m V 00 m 3 m 0m s O T E O N MW =0 W W O n mn E cYE O d mm %c a O1� a. Own O>E Z.F0 O mm Oft 'm 0- v "c�m�cK o �v t;,% o mvu D ym-Wm qV a 4s w z o `� $ � U om 3'd3 nW» = MNE.M. �m m o m E E oE E"w=y o E `uo m 0 o- c C m E o a d0 00 � W `OO,OE ULLM RO 0 m 0 3 .0 NQ J CJ LC m m O .i' tj ZDm NLmCm O Z. y � m O E O �m m a rc m ° niE t m 3 D _ E m r 8i'v O ymcJp g c a ai D m > mm m» n d oRo'm3 Xv m °rcg° mmd9`ni5 a c mOO --OTZ= 00 m6 a -0 00 0:mt N E 0 =8=*a ooa :22 m o � nm > 51X v =3e 0 33omm� Omm m° :-o 0 SO U0 0 p4 C c .Lru 12 mA c o`mm � Tmam Z @ m a c E rno E m m E m 0 0 c LLJ 0 - acI 0mmq0 m m'5 c OW m rm wo 9° o nq'm3 nrn now Er nmm M 0 , U =2E m g0 E U I- d'mJl -FU D >m0� L m L L �1 N M c � UA U U U C O m w EE .a �O ~�~ w °o.> ui TO c J a) w J E J w L T a O O)- D V U m °-' w c w n c c„a � .L. . U aE 3 > j :C (D aa� 0 0E° U O C c = O 'O N d L O C C J C O N omo3E a1 C J N w a1 w p_ O) (D al U a a S] C7 c E:ow'rn (D pW >C'c ova o c 7° Nna..o.W @ C C J w U a) w = a) O a) 'o , w a r N W W- n w M o w J c N dN CU .L.. C a:= cm 0O >'3 �. m E co U a) ' ° O C () C) n 2 �aNwEwN� > O C d O w ��m oo °-w- U ° w O Ws 0=0 -ca) --E, m m a(nSHF - UN:E E cl a D N a1 O= E V = a on c J 3 w wLO °-C -(D > (L w C mL � oc @ �U �'3m`aa�wnc O. w C> y N = C Q w W, 0 O d Er J a NO W Z) N U w O O own a w w 3 0 N 007 E:2 a) T U m= p r n C m ° p ~ N w o ww o0 o)(D0 w c °�L,a EC7n o oma'° EE°.00W�c_ aaan°1O O N C C O C oa c a CU L o E c w ox = E w E C .O C )Cp p N "O O W E n t0 a m awi c C w 0 vi ac) w S OEi w w w 0 O. J O' U O) O L S n ° N N c tmm— ooJC0 FLJ(h aO)= OS O w C O N NL OO -Op M O U N N U 0 N E d E d Oi J `o—`w�� LL M to C U p a C J a j p E 0 c - g- °0E @ U U N ° w d O 4 j w w O w C w C'C L L E O n Un°ca O p w '� a) c Z a D ai�OCC ID N 0 acr c En a 0 m nonw� m cO1m c)c� m L c U E x O w O U a) S U' S r w 2Q, n8 9 'Nry b-'*o =.ON O.V T�JO d YOCfnN EOp ° o's tl'ca$'Ep C7W Ss Q'�8�� vmu@ q° yv 3y5Eo��'mynec°d�� vv 'Su s C 3 m� = ` 2- O w W a H$° 'o'W a cwow 3 0 _ ° _q T •5WW e2.�u - °9vu mN Ee °pZ'� �3oJ' Q e-2 z c.D ay@., ° °i`�3�E d9$3 03 =`°� E °4 a� oC7 °c$ ° v E$a9.5� 0 0$o g ° go u 0 b Z3 W Q: 3 m q �.� Y $'o 'o • °- 4 �L �'u o i.°- u• °e o '6 E 0 w v w9 $ 9 pm EE3a°i �W E � °`a_ c• ° -4 Tr m $m m � U ooumm Ww o ?3 o a�E e3i �"y°'2 Z ;o 2oe0 rm0v5 eua�L '�a$36' -u0 �_ 'Su 5= of7 " >ERueo..ol7 ga °nr3 We 0 3 E m o c$ 0 5 $ uv _C0.7c° �3. =o °9 o cUoe �'mgE _so °d.'.°. '• r c��•96 o E"a 'U.E�Ko 3� -uuoW. e$ g o `°e''OaOovts o °(47 Y in j �L 9 EJ• O L y -A Q R-I L p V 4 O 6N Uoc�v eon.. °�a eo •• e= U U Y: �•> `go `d @v �- g��^E9�er'ac Ws °gggLa Cis' 2 �?03•� V q �O °�oEp'�')°e=gou °3g3o E3,00�o Vg3 O ov oVG� oa �OnVk�i n Er m w Uq � 0 0 i a$dC x�+a� 3<yy-0a en y�Y `ems Ml 7I Y uj uj K Z �� W ZO w5 W O ww uu z gZ OZ ° � a �4 O c e\ n o � E E Uo h „ yoga � =wa N �Hi•m o y W o O w C O N NL OO -Op M O U N N U 0 N E d E d Oi J `o—`w�� LL M to C U p a C J a j p E 0 c - g- °0E @ U U N ° w d O 4 j w w O w C w C'C L L E O n Un°ca O p w '� a) c Z a D ai�OCC ID N 0 acr c En a 0 m nonw� m cO1m c)c� m L c U E x O w O U a) S U' S r w 2Q, n8 9 'Nry b-'*o =.ON O.V T�JO d YOCfnN EOp ° o's tl'ca$'Ep C7W Ss Q'�8�� vmu@ q° yv 3y5Eo��'mynec°d�� vv 'Su s C 3 m� = ` 2- O w W a H$° 'o'W a cwow 3 0 _ ° _q T •5WW e2.�u - °9vu mN Ee °pZ'� �3oJ' Q e-2 z c.D ay@., ° °i`�3�E d9$3 03 =`°� E °4 a� oC7 °c$ ° v E$a9.5� 0 0$o g ° go u 0 b Z3 W Q: 3 m q �.� Y $'o 'o • °- 4 �L �'u o i.°- u• °e o '6 E 0 w v w9 $ 9 pm EE3a°i �W E � °`a_ c• ° -4 Tr m $m m � U ooumm Ww o ?3 o a�E e3i �"y°'2 Z ;o 2oe0 rm0v5 eua�L '�a$36' -u0 �_ 'Su 5= of7 " >ERueo..ol7 ga °nr3 We 0 3 E m o c$ 0 5 $ uv _C0.7c° �3. =o °9 o cUoe �'mgE _so °d.'.°. '• r c��•96 o E"a 'U.E�Ko 3� -uuoW. e$ g o `°e''OaOovts o °(47 Y in j �L 9 EJ• O L y -A Q R-I L p V 4 O 6N Uoc�v eon.. °�a eo •• e= U U Y: �•> `go `d @v �- g��^E9�er'ac Ws °gggLa Cis' 2 �?03•� V q �O °�oEp'�')°e=gou °3g3o E3,00�o Vg3 O ov oVG� oa �OnVk�i n Er m w Uq � 0 0 i a$dC x�+a� 3<yy-0a en y�Y `ems Ml 7I Y N U N W) o E a O3 o > E o m +L„ a) L N r O a) 3 r c E� EmcLL 0 @ c m c U o mY am �mQ Qa �UW o yo2 x3o 0Oo �o Y N N U@ a) > - EE n m aE `N°-Om �Q To -oN@ > o(n aEU O a) N O.� � N 'O N F U d d L N C X O) c �3YOE 0m0mY -E E o �LU!n o .Y -mac= NN��a m MM 00 ai - m m�W > (io N-0m E n- UNcU N D U E m L U @ j N (m) � c >� U@ �L. O O O -O KU N c- n= N- > a N O.0 c W Y T N O N N > > U= rn o 0 N U s c o U L F- O r 1.0 x X N N a O L Noa @ m . U U NFU N ❑ 3a"' =t6 `NCZi�� t =:—c 20 N U V n@ MO m 0,6 o�o.NC� >w�c m m@ m na o c L- N U@ 00t5 .n =t � E TM= N n E N N C m m 'u) CO m 0 �,O N E M ..L.. E .0 O AU aca `m0•2 - �a;m3m c ° - � > n F L N O o Et- cL•ZFU > X o x N c N 3 E 3�oofL- OncmiQ�) N N D—=z D 0 N N U! c U X U N m� c`L' m cLN-L O N ma�mo TN a' @ T E )$ N C T 2 N U -f/) @ N N 0 T N > — O c — �L..coOO Ea- w ofr W O N mO n n a � m m w= (Do o c m U owl o @LU E N _ a�3 U m to ' - (9 (7 W N c > w O m o °tea N o E a ana @ E Ma v 3= N O ❑ w C > N c NO 3 y@ c o¢ E rn m c o ? mz,oa @a 00 0— .6 N N 2 m w ma 0 �L m E o Cl) a )a N N 'y yaaw0Emow WE c m O c N d J. N O .mC C N O "O O N Oi O U —W n N U N N.O.. c N a (D(D uNi aSE: 4 -0 a) E-o yNO�5°Nma"imaEi a 3 N N N aG > o U @ cc r w 'Nc ¢ c "O] 00 w � a o = ` a mm O L m- U c a c mc m U = W O N aL y.-• �> va�a aoc�� @s (a `0 W E @ mL i O �0mw Y1L �)a2 NF- CY Oy N m a a0 N rL-•(D y❑ C O N Y c N a !!) N m N O O L n Hr 12(D (DZ;:2 mom M 'O � 9 T m V C T � w V N '° T'p � O A S C •p V G w °.. �" '3 W e =A u°• m— E�':� �° �' E D P � e rfi v � 'm E� u s d o m �' e to U .°c'. o y s E � �o. °°. s v U U C p x o Q° A ='com `pp.. €•�i EEC' t �,F `vw E—,T3 mEDa es a.',rJ'�'vpu =uSUY y,�^'v 44vc u :E co C(t8�'U.s_W - N m a1pU• ^pvEvu Ea 0 sa ' ^ E.e 3 Q SE> Ev E °E'' 3 c om e U 3 9$y o moa U$ sO Q y e� wlm p p v; Cm Hm—M o �.5 a °c m $ o aV U o U y an3= .e_ �p,' •w �o = a 3 m o V p mo c= w m �Sa•V�aT4 yu pO �Uwa w `v E «Xoo .vp � .�mo�o �ea•or�..v.°: gga •� °o_ �' �p �'Spowwo e°So{�Efi�w5gom.3 3.�' •o $5V v.. CEa �°E . .E m � ! v ° oo ¢ d €u w itl O° O tCSu °^. =V pc UyOC UT aO ea au_ E uU mw °O° > mo^.Aiaa.v ca no Gp$ $mae• °- °ws,�vm° -_°^.d m= �C' =C'En `Nfi� p s U3gS 5u m O � sUv o a og Ea o�-$3� " Q y — L� £p ,°n " ' c y E ° vv°u a c ' cN m c u T m �Eo °d t�4 `�a ry r $ >. a p �wE u a °$ ' y a > •aW C° .w N m cq °d°• �Ero >$ey a ^ ,)" ,, „� `o E u" „ 9 •J aOi U a °p c'°ca � EU ° u � u UE QU a�E F' ' •$ p p V C' o�a9 g `�$� .5E U s o `3 p ,°aw CS E7 U.=c c E _ .. fipE2v r • .r Mp$a C_ m=o� ma xtw " oEV n y •V O w$�E m C ^n m opepp p C uE ° r a o °Uy �o� �O , vd3 mo �Etl� oSr 'm bc u oUE Q rE °il, !2 v° vc °` 042 o m QYer rr..% O a eo E L g . a p Q'= $ a o O s y ` a c' p m � u o U r W O m— s E' >° e p” m oy 2 E q r c e w " a Z$ 0 o Eo IV 0 c.- n °B >o $ O T mOr 9w u $ m c ._ °ru�•a ° $ -u c E o v $ d •° E �°(' `� =° U a U> ° a �w•o o w p m 8 v ��. 'd, Vv m °> c 0 c °°d o m v f Q dE ooN.na � � @y oo e°i m e �w o 3 ya o md do• vmmo `o'o `o y's E3 v° E�aHoovyv ° °3i y 5v>o + N ❑ M ❑ 7 N ❑ CL o cf) = o N N r N C N F O j a O (D T (Dm d � o � U aL m am L @ L ai wpm 0 > w 3 o � N O a m O.mLU c m 0 U U) � o C o a �� @ E 0 o m E m Eo c c > a E > E >o a a a2 ° 1 E £ � .9,§ aa) M 0 U s =� =e C Ea C V e�x0 .° U N G A v O L - V p °m v 0 pm m g o n y E •_C. ` O O 3�•Sa wo S o E a Q E Ea_ w o m s.�ugy E�3p,G 4 $oC7zQ U U $ H v �.2 om4 "I E> U U o u o oQ 3•E «�N� N c_ O@ N N 0 C a=- m m 0 y �� a a U O �p N m 0 C O d N @ ° a -0 N E E aU N'Om o c= � 0 mama @0m m N U O U5> o mo U a to N @ > E +L. o @ @ U m00� m o N m ai'yoc�OJ w W 'E U.. � 00 m nN3ENcE w .N. N w @ o w E aU 3'x w oU o 4.mv@im > >� U> N y U O = @m'- o m U E c 00¢ me-Q' z E n m�° r W E-mN�U aviO a U�aai N N > W - @ @ 6 @cca�ma m N U m @ d @ >@ d 0 N o c in m w _ m 3.c olU @�o U p ID N U C C m w TU c o U mom N O U MU) >'0 @ OIL J rap_ W'O ov- " cUO d N 3 M = X O c� aL-• m o C m @ � C— 0 m °s @ 0 0 UL C— 0 To E= 0'm ~ N '0 E m--c -o m U a1a 00-0 m a @i�U N OlU r 3� L C N m w Y U U c y @@ U m o m c a m> o£ U o Q 7 y5JC� 9 j 'p O •Y C� C � i' Q� O� O E o g E V v v E v •_ ° orb A `u E ¢ yT E Y9• m 3 wl0'so mt �U oavEa «04.5o e U O 5 O 0 y4 �U�3J = �.$e5cc•S 6 4�.,4v �s <A mo m5`o °i U5R5sR o" c T V aV .yp a C 4 0 A > $ C h Wp C ad aA�i e e'er Sv u 'm a tO � m c• E R 'L n OT�E�A �YTAO R 0 a' o o!u'$Ea��Sqq my ma > ggV y ,g y> 6 V n .5 3A �° Ll a o u 0s. w w aCi c E @- N Ea @ Q N ' a U a o °'ELnL od L C 0- LL N j (o o= o (nw Q m (A 0 D 0 0 E`i. @ c 3Ur O C `• ..L. m o N m CL > Eo- m c 3 n a 0M ami , E O c m m m 0, Emmm'�p`m>. �a ^nU o-N N o m 0 m N @ o m(D 0c m ca @moo o wa =cn E'm a m�LL m ao mr � a @ ma a>w U�9 a U Q Z 0.-* N N m a p 3 U U o m m o= -«_(D °m ,e_S «T «BEd U8rn U' C A o x - $ o E-Caod 02 N C LJ = V b a y^ m 0 aa• a.m oVz ow-E A o9ppc!!a o o$ o c a w 0 0 m e 3 was x a A t o �+ m n= E � ,SU e_ 3a'vu i0 A 0' E o moo�•• o',« .Gd M d @ r a m C m @ C « @ O W O O N(0 O; U) —, EamE�m o olU c m LL ma 0) @ fN 3maa) ooV00 =E 0amn L@ = N Q U o O N r' - � Mir o m m- c E 0 M-O ��ma�. Ut'm2N a) EL jlL NN CL— cc r— Q L C@ 0 0 C d 0 2 o m C Q. U N O a'm U>) ohm c N aQ > 01 =.aL. o N U trail 01 � Y 0 Co @ m MOO= 3 N — @ m N- m 000 > aa) `o N o N @— W- @ m ` a N > �' C m C N M1 O E'- m oono9a�c�i0UE E oo! mw m4: 0 ma`mo M o@ N E a 3 m o @ `o C (D E!U m > N O N@ L C (7 a) FL. mLL N (� a> N of 3:a0 m o� A s vc 3wu � c.D_o• °vim e caSuUx �Q H �n vi U.- E qqy •y T eO eov3�_^Tm�•3 N tE IOmL �� O•p cN m A V A T� 3 pYFi A$ Aa mU Lo g d A w `A y 4 V p, Z ° A 3'n 53 UU °A e� —ye��� O V m61'44 iC A� C .Z S pm '�•5 FEu�E.a �. O ,b' v o y S A V (() J @ y 'NO E N 0 p @ N U U O C o m a) a 0 m y c� a a o ° 0 U a ° a 0 ° > T =a 0 00 U c c m E o 0'a ac n m nU c @ 0Q L 00 u@EW N L r L L a Z c ... C N 01 0a N 0 .-- C O C d cc 3:0=2W 0@ E o O C U E w o o 0 0@ 0 c d y E o 6 @ 0 > N 0 ° O U C - N E O'° U 0 U 0 = L 0 @ 0 3 N M.2 0 3= 0 w m m @ ° O O c E r C o M C N � C C 00 @ O C . 0 m 0 o c Z o C o w U N w�00 �E-o >Q O C(q @ U 01 N N 0, w',L00oEmaO0 .� @Eocz0o = -Q 0OO @@Mani LOU3c� @ @ d a= OL@.. a:2 U1 N (6 @� , 0 ymmaaiw 03 E° O @ N N �@ N N@ N c- o a 0 a o 0 E o 0 o a 0 m Na � @ L C N d O L- a > U.@ @ (D @ @ O O �_ w oocam.OU" N m a m m O w C= CD .3 U 2 N 0 .0 N @O a �2 � 0 o L 0 3 o a W cUL nE p�=-0 u- c o a0 0a 0 o C m - fl U @ C M O N O.0 Q. U W O -O U 2 M a) N �U c @ o 6u) Ems{ 2oc °"2cOE FU)ma 0-0- m�o.�nO. LO. .� LO 0 0 y1 C V C 0 -O @ w 0 @ C V N N U@ -O ca a'= tN>'00 .- 'cEosww E 3=��a U c F a 0 -� U o p n - Lam, w" a) 0 N o .0 2 U @ ca ccnoc Z?`¢ 3 a) LLu @ c �'NQ� w d E 9'3 -� � 5 c m >, Z f9 a - > "o o cQi o O m @ @0 E Wa@ C UL .0 .0 ca @U0w ca @E0c ° @Ua3i (9 mm °0... 0 _ 0 as o =_ 3: 6 c 20 D 3 Wco.mM= 0.U)> 0 t.c0.�c 0 m ---- @ c-o 3 Q- o >0 >aE ' c`0CL aam)'MOU °O- @"w 0o0 @pa W-Wo=ac�, o3 c0 y30 c`°0tL20oW.- 0r'MO= =o QUOf E° �c'�N�2a3a0),='- co(qt6E00) K000E U 30 d N w> M> O U C O a E L L L_ > Q rOo @QdU O M OM0QM- "" '6@ w @ 30 a '@O O @ 0) >� cC � @ -. W 3 T d @ 3 � c o0 >LUn° -c = @M WyE-EZ O o @m.00 c nE c w c 0 w C o N 2 0 N C w 3o N a n 0 fQ =`@ n O C O@ W.- E 0 o� @OC_0mEU aa)ia�EOc2o co_Em U, c n.- O o oL N O) °. L O o L L N U @ Q 0 O ° O C U to M c 3 @ EU �-0 @�"�= c2 2U E c L-o y ow O20E00acc '3g$cf, -°W�-; mc0 >vl_L- t- mEc�mf0_moa coU"'w :5 NEz >o 0 ci2a� oo -'y E3c @ 0o'o= U2O. -�0v ° `Lo o o °o=X2' o m°R c°i 0 u) aou @a @off i a Q m y u V .a Tv O >.3 = E-. v G •m V m p K m V V V V ySi, O A G •O m� m U V 9 L �' U (,) E in 'G C U 9 Q) .- o oF3y s ° -�„w„w o.-. °U0. m> cm^Uv� a €6 8 °' C is `a "'E m U y L' s° m E° y m 0. a v U'C °-, U 5 ai fi 'E 'g Vw c °G�o.'m Ey >w'yay tm..z m ° 3�'ry m' €•�=m.i�e W t p p T �as N r O . o m .- -, C m ti m vi ^ V .y •� T � Y CLt CL� G G.' N -V �'�-. v3 y0�^ t €�`J m E�3 �y`c 3aa m�3t °'m Eo "-m v «•y 2tv a$c g„ Ow'r�$q w3 -6u a• °U3 gvU m' °YO "- m�oQ3oc>:'o n °u E3 °a 0m`N O ° $`m o «m.°G doe° zm3 =pU,$t mvc� °ov U$Ev we3�� "5`m..^m >,a•CED�a.`af Ka'... GO !aoe ago mwsm„$��m° eGimd- $`m°�Eov °v o=°mo m g2 :: -8 m�o:.o t �fio O.. _Eo me- 3eyUm wmya`d. UCO$YQQ m, �m�o':? m Gm 2u'dw ��w °'c cp° 0.Lj Mo e_0. E > ° -oQQo° �v €'c °v3L''a°S �'.' 3 .e�-OO moT m•fi y C7 �u$5= °mod e>`�d$L'o EE m nC7�c0 $w� m^ y°mcr am «oca 4 w �° °° `0 9 e m im.yU�nia at 3v °.afi�E «E'mo.�'�- 'Opwv:a° Edm•`e- RS�°?a m iy w° c m !� .°-: a e u °• ?c� b{ v° o o'm y!$ ° o m o o ° �Ugg m�esio °mom UxcGmO S �Cv E'i '8 -°-ae uWfimr 0, 00 o� m3 ou:-,C. c vao�c° a mom e m v «'yoo0. i6uev c� eeos`c °�euyg afi °s e�m ost'.. c m°� -a��� e. - «$ cc m'c Umm mW L'• -_UQu °>.'cm � .7 m•� - � B• c3o m. mE N a. mo« m m=0Acq •O�m x m am c E�wLp l U E nm« so ''"Uae� V u«c v i� •emc n- .r m c . W oo` ,_mZm v 5ui0 �oo i v g M ao y3 MOU E-9 o m �$ m . 3^+ mmU MV- 0 o C7 m Q m G v v (J E�um$ 3i Y ?• m m e m o o >._ m m -v O0v a m o c m fi �m eoe oEu. -Ee`o dSo `3 €aCi c "x a�vG.� a -o�mo U zFm c io S .Lqq Je - ° �Eaoe 0o 3m > iaa(sE 6'_7 .. n UU m m g > o •°• «3oo$o.m, r v v a E ¢ uo0. U$ '3 �G ' �' O- q °��m>g. •.ymG fi - , y ..eu : o� Wo 1 C v E u.m. a �m v moG mE d q $ `v m 0.0 $ . = m m m o° °e" 6 `3 e �a omm m vv O> H� mo M_ yy 0.Utxim , r a=-e m 3cP oo .• � ° m � da itl .w °n 2G a> ow5 E ao� 2 3 m° R:G >@>°m t _1-yEU L m.m V e c y m G u a N N� •O d Y �i Vp 'O V> 6 V ° [' u O00 q� �.. O O N J� 'G E O O CC V G O � � � C V m 't m �(= Ym D e F U pv O O O O O) N y c y_ N ui ¢ m d �U m a-Oi" v `:c 10 coi -`�•'a moo' - � w aciU U-o o mE7, -2(D'S ter, acid- mN J.:. -E L O. a m y co C -V C N dcE�w C � 'O vl N m m ° N w V) C U U C E O- y ro mnor o ^' �0 n mmo U m 3 D C > s rL — . W w C 0 0 m c s 0 — gy N 0, = :E a N Om. N 3 N m N m C O1 N O -o O N O p 0 N 'L' N (D 0 n� m a) E° a0 m 0UmUU m �t-a I o�U a w— 0 U o o "O p 4-J N E y L L (/1 C O C m m .'c.. O N 3° w N N � N° c N N w 4= N o� U1 O ... N N y 3= O M .� C O` N C c 'V O U N C m 0.0 .O fp E y0 ' T N C `1 w U N m 'o C o N m c 0 o�� E � m a 0 v `m-Oo m D E Co O w O L N O 2 0 N �°- m yd m m U L E N O - a) U) -O m °N - N 'U C C° O w E -L.m N � o _, O N O 0m — r A W 0 m o - n ¢ -aw o m c Y mof Vi E C) E 3 co mU °c 'E n -p.`UE ate, a`Ui cTi ui� ¢ Um,o0- TO m °a U c �._ �: me n a" a w U 3_ w m m m° m U Y m m= 0 °s m:E °w.. —.,.. t o caU L E ros o 0 0° F. NZ..U-O U n s o° 0 3 z HUd n.. E v 0 O $ p p ; C a�T. C4`O. C �' Ci TO�J Oy D-5 u>4.. Eex o'� E4 'pLU.om '�dsu. =zy2 Ea°�c0°�U2aE3¢� >E a VJ 'Y V F y '- V> Q c •- ° s a •c U o p c° ra -�.�Cp Tat'.p�DVkL'- G4.>OC men °U p5 o'SC .Be ,c�m�yrjolb - o `°• y y m i. V OT °� U p C 0 � y oOm yOa1O a6U E7 ai= °c'Seagud $xEw> co Eo.Qp�Ca7cca E�EGw 3$o�T uW ,nz'�A39m`o��'xdE c .. E 56 o`�o E °io y a . E yS w > bC 0 a o N E a O q u G V k N y 2 U 0 c a m E g M S- oo �p m W a w u _T W W U . y e o f °a Wk Fi 'ag `�aSeyE s$�i 6EUem ao. a E0 U01uu$EQ °= 9appO°WmaE00 U V 6'-9 ai' ` O o -- U y 2 .c `o p o q jy p� .,., a G 1'• C y V V L° .4 U 79 0 6 12 ° U �a0 or,,avo.� �L O $ O y©- ' E� E > V; o 'L0 U •C ° a � O_ " aN V V pu�Um �'aw� c U'S . °Qa•�a UL C p p E38a���xo�w� Cal � 9••�? °� a'�gu u poEo$i�°,poop 3a €9 Ua5 i3��•o y?�CU9'S �vyO m p •°o. ,ow�b,+ra° 00 c� a U U o 8 o U 0s x� ° �a 3ai��� °E3a$m o Off u•o 34�• o�v�� L LT y a -m ,Ur oa�E°'$ m9 ��?t c. >>• o vas u �UE E�a•3 0'> �w H O V 6 -a,2 � � a N'p- S U c c u a m r .e n o• �. f'1 F..0 i� U rin W V W V 'JP 6 I x m vi V .y = y •y T Ta S - -w v c u° U A O �'N V y a.�oy W5 a C.V O S$ w W�a u c6 is.�.0 c " W a •y p° 7 n p ��5�cci °Z�u dmur�v �'E c�o pip a y Q lJ' U Ei 4t Z m V A m3'SEE F'��gg c J E o�itl W EO x C ,-Vi rR 0 m"t °ym -i>iL °L °p u� Q m � a m - U m= N O" G O' N m N N 3 o� c - �w mm � L O ai ao > O 0 m N C N m m p ma ❑ N N U N N C.- N N N O O ❑ a a m N C L 0 N O O 01 C G N Q' d' W w N y? m r m 2 85 e maa m m� y o y q� m-g =C7 og Cgq y m � Co.E W Tm m. m q °• o a h rd W rte°. m a E 4� cN,_y,2 Fi Y 'rte °' •` ° 0 a a $�af.G wmw�°EZ' 3� _yE9 E T Tt� ° .° C w C O m m m° ZL N $WWS >c.i�iQaesa �" °a - N c gg� d S u =« N c 3 3 m. o o 8 m -o � "p 0sggw° m « o xF4C7CEao.- �u0 •OYE uo� q a s a a m ss°:: ° x O °c °o 'C� mm $ m g °mmv ywa 0 v a e 0 ' T y 0 U a .m . Em � O m e E m „E p o i a E o a m5 °? $gz 0 c°vS�G�emx3$:: E 5° 12, FaKi °d,�S.E m o W vi$ nq m mtG mC7tlt7 eS o 0'�U o, a°' .. y V Q 6 m r ro O O � m❑a �a� a ai ❑(IL 7U m 3 0> c > a w S w� w o E a �' w-° w�°O m _o N U L _ C O N U E O N c L c Co m C d@ 0 c QL" �mwa N @Omf6 Ew0 _O O w w w w ?i N O n w M «. w E o-O -° n°1iK Eo w w a) Em w- m- 0 (D 01 o mw m @¢ o (D wm m _� w C U O c - O N O w w Q @ CL �= w E T- a1 w Y @� Q d w O U y E a° o o 0,7-0 0 w s a- E C0 a c c.cZ c o 00 o- w e a 3 woo ¢tm U m o c a mmN �c a, o QO n- ca 0 0 U O) w E @ 0 0 o m o a m 0 E c: p Ea 0 E , o ❑ r°�yaxi ❑�xmv arnymw3u,EQ`oN wL0 NmFyQ a;°?=,' =0 coin. 'm o. °1 o U a.a o N a m o y w QU Qu o a > o `o a w w S yi N Co U N w E c +w+ Cfn= d' N _w d n. o E.- v o 0.2) ) wn- �N E `� E q) 10 EZ o a) 0m� m � �'oU 0 U 0 E o-UF o cQ mw m >02Q 00 > Srri a) CY H v �r w� o. Fdw m � U � m<O rn o s°OO •�c�p 6 19 as -$'9 vocoou °o go,$W oo Sri°. ��m9 Z°•.r,9U 0;o`,um U' Z ?EU Baia 0.v aUv a uya•,itl -, °�'xv� es(74.0 Doti usy U >$��yU �S j� �� U0. °U °• Fe Sw o•y3o°0 0 pa� °� a' NVJ yN � o.x 9w $s c B c c c o .° S q5 � u c6?yq.'�v u °E �U d3 aoo 5 -.90 l- S°'o 'S m3va pp`�o u Q Nvy O.y+°f�(7•.tOS T G E L O C w �yL " eU v°it U U an 0 '3 q C°o N a C9 w .°i ry . � U cU y C s ° w a Ua0 ° o_ v $ s oo$� •�So �°oS = r'' '`a ma O_`^°' 'wU�oov vm06 NnY^��od°u.°a''m$4 oaE.°,' v ��Lyo�.°,. �c^:$d��EE�,UULoco' -`o`c s O cU� v ° o°. ' ^ •°y°�O3 ' ma« ey°mm° 'tev a J > m c ,Z' ' �°v x �Fm `�. o '.«So9 c •wyn°° 3 . � ° m _•.o>y.d°�3s'.Cote�`co3 ' - •''$ a W $ 0 ° v � o.''$a>°c °c�' . 'oUa�-ua° ygs�o° ,• w �NUo v 3To ° ••f.•U mo'w8Yooi PU.o .Uti g�3 m° . R .tl's>E aoo3s �._z0 o Un� • ^s G c° g c $ to 0 o 0kVO � ° ow 2 V b=. o oo ?M o o UOVO g x Emit ^ A 'go N do•s v c a '. •�L � ° W O P. � '. J' '° Fn dy0- .2 1�+9 Uor� U.G G N9r�. �'�v�m9r p T 6. > 5 N5 G I't' O � W 9 Ca O% ° a N�+ C .4 0. hCa oC:o6 R, g.3q 0.a F°EU � � N 0 o 'D m c a 3 a> m c m LL ca> mmmaa m' o �2 wo mS �m wyE Q = 0n m-'s = mio M wU o 0'= £ a E 3: na 'w E 02 0- Q) N o�on o d C m w O m m w0 p 0 m> C O m m .w. O LL m w mO" a �-°'U a M-T m Ewm D�C o C Oo LL m �E 0 M Nw w amE � m s ' oM�uD mmm�wQm m> 0 o mc > E w c E m m w or � �s 0 a° o o m ca m N c O o y O � m Q 0- o x o. - o E c c m c a w U m E a a o m= 0 0 m ' N o m m a)� m rn y m a y c o a ° �a 3 LE o 10 m mE w a) > (D m o a .cc0 ❑ j0U) U«(DC) o >on: O �U oo ~ 2 c w = E L o ° m co mw c 0 ow w � mN m E c 0 o O a 0 u) O ` C w `-M m m o.0 -wn7. M.o m c °c'c� @ a(Di air n.oc w ! � Sc 0.�m-mm o w �om 0 E w c rn 0 ap i o �L o 0m`m m goEU0 (Dooro ID no EmS m E o ma s - 0o'0 > -2:, mm - m 42 o 0 0- a] s m y U o-= x o s t >- o u o> CLa m= w ¢�:�3m tL >0- mm0Umm vaU y.b3N� o �aE' ° °dc yo a•y°m°�a. °• SSomo�s��$?0 o0. P0� 0 O O U C ti 0= 0 0 9 oU U o �3 m ° omE vt-. :m 5 'm EmU r- um 06 =0990": wo m E9 uy W C u � 12 a 9 ° e o b. m m m tgy o r dvaa ��vbo�y>. °o3� yL'sF �'�r w c y o o ca`� � c'�°y� , ,u` o -�M01a by b v'H� ,gaE`� ' ;SU°m e ',y $a>. �a ^>+ . .,°, , v�o• U-m ''�o" c ° a� oou,w'° OCC.ea u°• °e?^vovm E$vo.O U WQg > c° m0 8$ m0 o8 E o U m $ O m �� •o .. O L V u Q O m 0.mp my Om O 4°� n .y y ° Q 3 a n d ti o `•°• : a 0 Xj 'G en8 b Lm ' p; dp u~L o ' .u:. C Fmm' tm •° Q -.o v O m 5 0 y `�m xN :O : °a .^°n ' - dX " vG m g X9 -ti 0.0 00 ` ¢ U M e U O ° m w i 2c $ v c o n C a O C0. $7 .m9 c ~ ti°oo �dj� m3 UB a Y3i mU C osc �qya'Se�3 vUoa3iay� o�v�a•6i� �SF"o=e° g r aaUs >'3' U u c 0 U`u boei � y b o °o3O vvuU •-�C°�mv�a ' .c ou.«SCc O � vOL' s�°y:U � 0 m0oa4a ��gt'i 3 >o ,m= °V o° m m to > $ym N a U avE= Ud«° tq u U &Jc o° gy.Ce J m o m Cc.zem aT,md3v•'5' '+U2• -° m' yy�uU« m'¢ 'd c�3m °o oa�v`ddo woc c.oyu E owv� °3 'O mmm O'O V'f� U OZi U.ao .a.QaTi po° o� al aj bobNr���aU a�a33o�'n �d��dpp5 v6E�o 'L'a5i- L= '� °o'°a•°m U 3.2 m[LxU aoC0.7 C 'ud" �°v C.2 °o•$p 3o W M { LO 0 ❑ � O O a CD N O C N O C C @ p@ N @ 0Ua N N ca SC 3 �L n m @ LL -0 o a m pa @U� d0�CON Z) 0 °m�@ @a .°E@° E om m o@W'vo �-0 � 0 m ri-Eo m mo `o �" m -p c m N ° N N CD @ E C O N> C7 w N V o1 N L L@ S w O L Q X p C N @ L U D 0.0 L@ a) F- tip�mc= �E- T<2Qoo >> "O U) C LL O Z O- Z :E C m U a n E > > 'C O >U1 N @ n w O O m > Em m ( a ZD a d O L(N CO y o M o @ N m2 E-' c.B p o OW 3 m c Q a c c O Z N N W'5; S N J N N c> O w U 2 af c ywE cyo(D a) U-o y av J 2 W Of 0 N O 75 O 0 Q_ n O C W 0 3 .N @ 7N O E ;F O@ N O (6 P 2@ y r C E N Q) 00 L L ° n wo- z< 3L..Uw =6cc'4 '>.2,•'��N�'m�m. NOvQ -'duo °°,E¢�iC 79 F'�rym�U `�P>'�w °a oox'sws�`�i'.°c morp Out 0- 40 40 o��a.�� ,g$wN'°_ '-`Q m3�C,`�y�yaad•$ °'s`�>•m>,o 5- 15 50 ffi m'q�mo,o A,o'55•'�«4a wC.y °3 y���$'w s °� -°. ?,E 8o My Wv wo`°o'v c$yro'9 cv3 •5 vCCSg'5.S"co,�a�.oro w.¢!'ac� O m$ &" 3y oN•�o. ;E '= a>�� °Eo «. .0 .iv °t.i °�� Y. °c y a.g o.E os o• e c U a�•° CA ° C °�°' d E Y., n c a, $'� �'C7 y `fi x 3 w� U�C7 �, F�y H myU O ' yNm U 23 ry 07d m o m z-0 o �c ° � mm •3 4 3o o <c yq°N O9t�v m�auev« $gym t.S ,«c, c•°• «w... 9ov °° m �a.u�c�GCa7 oa3Eo °S «p°� °ov o d w,Socym. �.. v,ocm. x 0� v��.$o >om.5oy�o, -' mE•O •$xu 5..rvu w ^ °�E � 'ra 5w 50 E6 oa.aa a 3 -U n U . 0 °E .0 OU �° &g � .4 °c� x o �W N • `�O °- .m5 a) y °fiU ^>�2W ' , . N 'xJlm ° ' O ° .SCdLm O '°33W- 3 T vI9oumo ' pp J w tOv wyOdc � a Woo KC ,c o � C 'w W . %v '�>j•, 0 Z- U A> = 0 d •a v� w Z °°5 `� ° B °'BB'S ° c a r >.:y �� a a°. y o ro 4 mi 8 ° avm `� a•� v °' EN y .+4 w °Fc'- s .°- y�ry c o c L° 3mw5m$5�o°oN O >Q �'�'O � °w °n NmNmo'�o�ya%vv°'°'u a'va�y_mQ G�ym'�v«�9 ���m �fiU C �V..�L._m GNASOO''SCC'O ��OO EGC .�S ° m- cEoUx F 2 E a °mca o c v m 5 1 $ -3 cw .v. 5 c am I¢ oW axi v�.a° a. W .. Q V M- N G W U p m O. E� N "� E ao o ¢ v W - oEEEmnc1°o �� arna Om - ° -mo 'iu m t0 c°� o c6 �i na .�. m m am�L.,`o�Nm�m E.� Uma 0, a c (0 OM !E — NL N '� m m C m CO C O C L N d 3 m a y N m'aiv arno�0?`9 En oZo� 00 0 O C N n E 0~ m L m 0 a N U m d > Ui a N N y0 N O N 'ct m O2 N n' c N a° ma � E m R 2 m moo = a �-m. m °o�� U m a_c� m m E � o mm=oc 7EM - mow o a� 0� . - -O .0 N 5 °fl @ r 3: W= ❑ N ° F ai c Na a;T E 0 C�um - M m E c N cm O tr O m— _ M N m m N y y m W CO j C m U1 � G' r 0 0 3= m m L O C N y) w `m 3 m 0-- 0 =� m 0 y c o't u°iEw3m�e° om a`r» o Umm ~mm0) M, c mo -3o 0 mCm,>UM2m Ma ymEC H 0 0U °cCO No CO m"a W O N N N N 3o Tom'o.�Yym oem�j my ovE mmm >0 �o_m yRo s •3�0O5 oo >.A� Ey'e r�o'�«y3 �v >o�C�n Fw .°xT H°'E $cn'fim mE °>> wE" m� °c �'°qq��x'v o.f°o 2—i c o c fiV° mE'Z c Q m 3 ) E 73 L) °o> Wvg o v 0 5 ° r' ate m 0 °ids 7 9 y C x G >>' O Bo r y "o ' 0°> m - o U x� 40 �, o °o �c C7 gU.!S E`�o9 �°.0 �?°�?22 $e u v wsmw��'"�`fi� °om �9ca�i 3 °C7 �'° r��'i''9 a.�' Vr� �ry c:, >Chb 00 ym o o�o orltpy� «�.9 3 oy a `o b•4�i ,J �NQ'N U V A OQ %2 N $ E G mNO NU m O.� mW� � 2.0 1 � W mj oQD' &o� Nm5d m'°'e"38 �e�C�Ef~m 3mo,d El m.oi oy��c q o.E c p o q'.°, $ °w u O o c 5 a v as `"GI:Qv °b $ efi P1fi? ^Q.c Glm = O omw ° v9w Q c � oa U o ' a. m�• °^ 'm c o$ 2:1 omW RNo❑ md T° F R w O � ym m :a -2- � a U n U m .- a m ..°a 0. o e W ig 6. A ^N x 9 -t 0 i V u c°u 8 tyEE�'S m w �^q>%0 oy,V��A U y s" vV 0 Oy8 >cm- 0 v9° v=O 5 °o °'vr a vcy w g 5 M o15 . a ^cov c u O 3E ^x vEv °c fie °o 'a P. �❑ � m � c� � ��`°��'pap ,r3� ^pv a3 m3��.e�°' � 3m ! kV �dm. m m i UmVoOoaxi mow . ' °,• -•rr5 Eon.q °= °: � ai �o ooW �-,so °p°� F� E3Ui. os ca�',q -ycc o°.eC E C7gva va ayai'OCo °E9y °m m`�-� .. € E �•' m a o o ° o -'g a c xoA:$ c do oo_° i2m E,°c os 4- .�3eoE�wu o._ ° a mN3vem Tx Fc�E�o Uay_ a sa' acorn m._ T $ 6 -aA CJ 1 I I I II 1 I N N N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 02 N c C > t� a M N Co C W ° @0) p° M N a mE m m a o m Eoa i m N a ccw d s a acy� omwnm3 a -- m m o0W E�cc L c ` c w4amM'_ m- N � E n a c o n a w 0 0- °° LIJ aow0wcv) m 2 0 >o M o mu c n ° ` o m 2 c E - - LL v o mq U) m m o o U) OLL nyooQ m- E 0ou)_: :°ot a w 3w2 - � O > O_ L M 0 a m T m m a m 0 cc= .c O 0 ❑ wo 0 Z 0 @� n °acn o0 ODt� `m oy°Ycc_U_ o Do �� o L p E°aa0� °O ° mo'm M a3ic a) �°o�o ma °mc.c no a�om3Wc'E�a��o.m o o c °c ='�m c¢ �0:c c Ea W no °s = -c �a 0 c o c m o o 0Ua° o C ao=o pca En m omyaHO��'- w� m�=Q3 mU -a°� m N mwo6 E U�NE o°c� rE =� a'Nm ."nvnNma3E c E3< EU a>icpa`mya>i-mo�m.cmpwm °3m Eoa o o@ c .S Z N_ U 0 � s o 2 a w y o C 0 m c c o'- o f= o a Q c a dyu�m aim 00 (nd"a-`m o300� m oMLm D '� -ma Ua_ cc aa, omi u �v aNaci« mo°'�ONJU�ma¢ia aaio>, mUUm Um3 o $_aWi ca np �� (v E) �Z ° EQ �� � m.— m� oU m Q) m_-mo � w t6 a2 ro m �j w ���- 'g =QLC aN `oo"uL�J Sma��:°iW- 0c00�50 axiom y .m..dFM N �� 0CW'lF"0 @c 3owmov,m moo,'.E'?oa�nU�nNa� Lw&(D Nom_, m o 'o 0 0� oa o_ m -w _ OOf °�acimUoo aa - OaoaQ�m `ooccwo.c`0NU0ma� > °o'°p �»L" -mE >OM0- aEEmo.° -mom m�`'�°amt6� °mommm"�nN2 =0c`o a) °M= mN ^��a o,Nm �U ro >m wa3 rnZmT:o -�'co mtnm y @>>, om 0) °m oi. L._�onc._mc �c oWLUmoo oom >�- N�LC`p o— '�'o= , >dd �� 3 E m=o oa c o a, N oa a� c c m aao o c m�V Y o c o'w o c ac o 00 0 0M nc 0c a=mo EU �w °NF omw o>.�a° urNC� mamo U22 OC�-o .�:? mM (o= din:- ELL ca aa' U),a?o plc w Oaci cCD a) Ua.c�`m -�� EaEi �� >m�E� oUEU- mpU)C, 0�6ocU) O amn� U�mm o pm�mQc.- inn mna,Z`a�u,n m2 m2aci�oLc'y�aU, DLO_ 3nm a1 C m .c L n c ._ p_ (n w 2 W— M, O .� N a m O m m �.� I - mmU °F'm ��m�si 0��moUQ°wo tpo'mpE �ow_E N N N N N EO T �• •y W Y •• 9 C C 9 T u Y m Y Y Y `Y, w a U $ `°" m ra m m ❑ U o ° A v vi > xw `o w 0 �`ya3 A 01 W x�vvoEV °c..w EW ��a; wa. aao ao Y_ aram$ 3S Y'8�oo Y o =0 `aomos� aZi67$�mw°s�C `2 °�Sr�Y. o.ai 3 tea. ooE.�w E�� •o •g Y U�'3 Cy .�.�°.9.• va?.0 ai .Yw op U- °uU y : p `o p LO w N C p > a @�-p ID E U m w j y> c oc U-os c w�F' c a) 0 cl)m ~c >:EE� > V d N d N N D O m w m aU U `a�� w @ o cl) 0 aci0�m 0 T m w C C a m N ca C o W m >, m E {a c o� ° m E w " MO Q) 01 w t+J w> m> U C p> m awiH �-OC a_par w 3 nt s o m d m o m 3 t V t > O ` °c' � w wm w m oU 3 E m c� p C p w- E >�w o° op ° yo ff@ 0 2U m wN >a... a�N� .. = 4 d a ° 2LU mc oEvom o cn v �E o m m�m rnrn� O o C7 �'at 0 03a= y a cmi�m yc o EO cu (D N. ac) 61�weo >a wE6a) -p K m mdB w ai o � co.Z o m�UcEa >o. oUm >a Q �� y °0.3 axi Q� a3 0 m m o N N M � � O ago �-OwU °c .°, °99'°j wa 4�8°m' m0 .�a°YG �.I vaw my# o , U� H �.£✓° Nyy �- °a oy°' o;L �te°SEy QU ar�ov,am 7 -'> .. w. y � oe4 ° .m �e°_O pupE° i .pp aYO �mmy c «-'Qm N °oo . dfv �Cd m s •o°� V t _oo j .0 g� ma�m+ a px� aEj i - oO° � .-x SS c 2 • o °° -S °°0 -�50 °o i' �.so •.°U8 3 3 2i Ue u.T a�. ' v oo�°', syWdC •o o o m � � ° mc °o -•aT°-° 0 -a°°m ° = . 6 'Ub" �r�a w ia0Z� '�rx�yiao53.�`v c° a-<w «� v �A w�-° U S o 8 ° 0 ° c :2 y O � wopU.� s�.Qa,So°E umo_ O , q U a $ cae °m m � `o o� • O.A 0 o a - o r a �°"- r $ U >U m UOti0 o 00 UE o.= -O m v 2 C b .- 75 OUa W ° 96 °G o O 3 a 4° p° o°v y 96'z - « 4A. U' E� a3 -= ca ao6 G v o s3dg'o �°'U s ctA - So .2 g r � aFE$o EQ � �'S� V .m°c 0 0- CSg 'v� V o y a 3 ? v m- c�. -a 3 °° '° o a � 14 0-5. go g 13 u'v 0.4 °o td &� W o 0 0 � oa 0°i ' O '� �-$my'rJ .°&J a°� c •ESC °0.� 00 c n _e°°': n n° 3y '4a c a�i 'E �'noU�♦ W ,oa E.E N'm ai �U dS " 2°x0 o0Q t5 0- axE°ov ° U •- Uw w �vqv �m°UL �mEav°c�oa °�° C47= ve. °mNOwEcv Uadw� c s_ti o o5s °,c .� c U 3 oU u C oW U �ia° .. o 0 , o G�°cy30 am3CC9 }e9}CS TFF °9 p q SC3Oy 0 gPH Qo�mg �Q `0°uL 0 >=O 0 -vu] 0e O d » ai.� C _ p o11 UaA > 2: � s Y � N _a N c O O o N M M L — N @ E-O cCO 4 U C 0ma06Ec m a16is CO Em m EmocmO —oXo w c m'D cw m �Mm�aZa >a�� ° 'a°� �r axi aai m Q�.y...>a) m :°t oEE m m o ° > zo E _ m o°mo n D x °,a= EE >- m 0a N (d D a'° M= E w U) M O ° c 0 E C° L S aci m O .° M- _ c a w )xz .Ni -o m m a m C m C = = n ° > ° c oa�4 m°° N m orny N a E > N E r._a me a °wA > c°ic ym co m .D c«. m w aDw° ° N o0 c� c>E N mU > > O ° -o° f 0) mwamm o� ° mrn°° 'L y c n C a m m m o °c > N E�O ' m c 0 co mmE °° m0n00U 0 U o ow0 ca CD y NLQ' M C� U a' O m 0 m°-om°t0 � X- o E ca U rn my>r ii a) Emo3n �m ��m a �m� curia m C... a- a °� O N m+N- t O- @� ° Ea E o c� E r L,c -ate m > > XUonaEa�c V-a co 0 3cm o•ooc aay °o = =mm��'3 �= Vay o�mo 4) @� F(7 (i w m� �.L. m❑a Q:E H.n° m Fd m N a F m M M (MJ M M M Y a �/ U m w Y W x w :3 aciEam °'a'v' '$ °- °A °'E 'fl�� 6o `D O Ep yyaa o V. •w��E q 5 amm �c�Y —14 WvT °�TQ >�Y_^. qU r�•by, L'aca 4:y o= y'Eo°P m .d G Yr�Y. °iQ �v�i y.YC�$C7 Y3� 3o '" , «W�4Y °' 33 °_' �. v '� F E ¢ 8 o vC � °' � ° a �� pC°pC v z � « o •°o_ � vC U w+ 9 U C p VJ 2 y C W O C N O V W x•°V w ° pY a F Y O Y"e_C7 �'J .^. n & "v .Q �U y,Y ammx °im y ° °cvco._°.3� �'s •op�m u E W 'C° R N u� "r : .� 0° 0 wq " SQ �'i V c O 'S 4 V �• �m°> '�yN am ' CappN Y l :N C Gp ^ G O :)s J O E6 O U O m v 3 ��w ov tEtl� Cv y.�8m w atjo.S °?go z > u w � ° o .—O $Q «gU F a o c 2U j d F'_eot o. s• Vr�. b"4 o c o aOa �Qv yin ° `o Y 3 ;4q w E c 39 u o m¢ -z!o UCQY"Y02 y E y CC cU 0 6 V YN b0 m w O a .2 op A '3 > m> U O ° O Y a a e E N ._ m .c 8 yQ O .2 >? Y W J `O N « m C n .00 o V o m � '3 c og_."��DU �t4u;: '�sa v Y C 60 sud9oya dyd� >ay uYO.°^y� ua °° Y >•�os a'�,°ka9i a3i .5 ��cc$a 3S qpR 0. a �'H O -W [i8 9Q 9 a'sEu� 053 axo ?Q RO 4 � ••,,, F ox u ri v vi � w "' Q Y • .'C. M c M M M M ° ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ N C ~ E O C @ @ O N O @ C J N N D= > p O L O @ 4 L @ @ 3 y N Y > N O N N E d d @ N X C E = N N N O @ 0 U) d t N d n C M N N C @ @ @ Y N U G =— N L_ E N N @ @ `. M @ C E O OI Y r N= O@ C N a V N N N Y OI U N U? @ @ d N@ O C °' X a. U N y @ U O) L (!J N@ C @ N a@ C ❑ O E E @ N O N.•L <Z W O O L Qa CO E L @4l N U U C= N d Q m F Y 0° D FL- c m T ^^ C x v w W w m u 0• ''u:' d° �e1 ihe 94,k N Eoa° `ua �-t 42 Ga v ga• 4 _s,• 'c oy Cury 3 .•c.M•°VE ol ° "E d e y •o otq y� oiZ eti c 5,6 Vim= w vmvroa na'x •_�atla� aoC o �m$,°1•a 04 �a .�� "dE m ."g$o"� 50• mOyeC d` o� v °.�a�4 °�O•� muV Z3 u v d b '� v S °' y m � d 'y m. � ° ° a � ° i iv "e � 44 •° v Q H Q j s� i ; y y (] o w u y b C ° •° y d tw Q.k. .� � Qdq vg v S ?� b m u�Q`Q°o v vim''°' m upd•:M c �n �° � � �eg� a °v 'gym 4 �•`me � F �� � G � .-. ... � � a • y ` � Peril Q Q � N m N � ° • d • V 4 O N '3 •S y N • y y • G uJ 4 Y Cl! nl to r m rn o N ❑ O O- � O O 0 N C U C �5 6 O > N O U U VOi N N¢ N U (p N O N w y N w N j o 3 O C C N C@ to U@ N N (6 N N N O L M N V O @ W¢ O L y 0— N y,U N 0O N 'a T y C i w p, M d U 0 U) 4- O N O f0 .o 0 '� .� U n'o o _ 'D m m O com r-o a Imo N ✓0 h y N a `1 t0 .�.. U O O O N N W y M O. m = CD a m @o .-' _o O J U C C U N O O " m m o U E m= w U Q N d 01 a"O ;�_'T y Q O N N U C 0 N U N N �mm aa�im a -T a v 0 o d o 0 V V �� ! d..L NC •p U V Y d y p• - d b Q` aoa> tledre �' tlU 5 c$ Y o CvgU :Ej aN,a eUw v�v b da b M v •. v '� U d 3 0 y 4%. c a p C.�v� s�so�'a�� �td s�ygd °`a• �� b'c i' d4�p•S.Cmb °' lQ �.d 'tibc �y �tl b w y d C j G d to �ou,.0-4 a.y 2. :a y�tln ri " yz wn uy�uyTKC••3@ �Ee' a Q �n� n �p � �> w ° y y F � ye y y o � F ai 3 G "oj v d p 4 w a o .T. ro j w •' i v PO. C C •O 3 L i n ? d a c 4 a m a a s 4 yvv a y e •3 pry. � .° o 0 s C ' U T N M ¢ U .y � F v T a tl b4 0 a o v v y w V U tl�etiyh A a �•d�d = 39ti A •O o °04 O> d 4 n u v'p, °�' a` 3 a a �' p .-. W� • i 4 x Y� F � a F � F y v1 h 3 u p y C� ... � d p 4� d • .p. o -. • °u • p N ^ M V 0 6 0 7 d V 7 O N @ @ N N U U U N E NU d q N OJ d— @ U O N E d EF , Y. - U me U) a C C6 N y cf) @ O N p Y w N r N @ Q O CE@ > N @ @ C O W- N N G O Z 00 @ I- 0 N N C A N .. @ U N @ 0 > U _N r 0 O 0 N N tt- U rp m N m C ry d O @t5= UE @ = O U U N C) 7 d V o a 0 0 v q'� � �V •� �, o ya•yOaai gu r�n aGi G °� y O m .. •c3 w„ m 0.•pO is � "• C a�i {yF� `m N q Sj .qo k m ° u o o vi N q° U o S! C L �' G •q 'O � p Y L ° E u n � i U u y q U 3 �GL mb•� g o h u •° v� � ti .£ � O v _ 4„ �0.oC w •o �%L Env e v `°° q°' aci ."�r .$ p^j �oa w 'oL mo a , v� u u ° o 5 -S `e E,p° o C 0.5 tb � c x ¢o vv w CQ P. zv v a .r� .7� m y cggy p,° av p rL U N C O L> O a a a L9 r L9 a o a a s @ T r @ � E o O o 0] G C � @ M E C p O j N U N r @ =a m cU p C C_ _ ' fn E N m N U w `O L O Q ~ @ @ C N O L @ C > @U m ai n° n °- m �° 0 w @ @ C Q @ N N @ V Q@ q L L a p $ E :... p Q 3 @ C N C @ N ° C c C w O o75 O N U N @ L O E0= p N C U U N Q - N N N N O O N @ .O "O a�C7 y. g -a� - M"uori .�c"q [�.udd vU� g �o,.c��4 d'�rr�' �•.s .s y' m p° 00 4g ° ^tl8 �i°E`at -Odc° 0 •O `"Oee v'd`� Xpi ia o oRV oV o.g c 's a Rt $ U oV o,a n'.u. N•# cMc°�'+$4 N o v5'424 w� .1 •°°"1u�eoc�r v a�dmv v ;�3 pzdo a. o, "r c o h m W rn C oo W s 4 �uU'o °s�`tld .S a�C3 °1 ¢` a mayivCe3c rn x•`03 4zc`n °'d4o.Euu °'.aes y m _Cc�tl o 3a3 .0 o C w'3 ° Cry n3 40 a ° v fi w 0 « y W P4 q`' o o a o °p ^pm-Qy`�3 °� •• V M�`c'�a d� o`° °' °:'•°o U .yak �_c d °ola•cro23.3 � ��` '� � a �a�'vpev � °'.`°' ��U k m U3 �e•E4yee`d � °envti4 'Eu a � Ur.^ ,r °'- a a V �o cyU °o s -coc°, �,�o°e°�aa' Uvn a, FLUV4 'yo" •o ycn���`eW w Via° s e N .' •01c on z L V '- `or d . W[.c gc°1�u" v E . o.a .. % . ° a C4 % VW V] �o LO °° d o 0 0 _ Imo 3 O N a > m ' a) N �> C mQ � 0 U 'o O `m c o a LLI oa•- m c c o .0 c o3`m -03 N Q N N o c f3i1 +—. L > m m 0 EL N 9 @ H. N 7 -O N L N N 3 O N O Na LCD -O CL m 6 O m c 003: 9 C N ❑ N 2 M m N m m N N O ❑ C [NO ❑ p_ G C O N (SJ N O y O d c o m Ca c c y N N C N N= C N C N N N N N O N O'0 O> L O O 0- O N 00 N Y Q N, N N N. O F CY O. LO l0 l0 LL] (D c � •S '3 `°.. y °$ w •S 'o. u '� r m cd• U c C�� d o h ec Ntrd 'vcU S o o y '�ddOd 2.0 dcva v 4 ° "1, u- 'o+y Q °,d` •��t .°c •°, eau >o d y ' o R' c ca �•� o2•E p,v d .a v rn C� •p a m b0 k ° y o N t V 12 U W tr S° Z h o m p7 E d ti U 0..d. °' 0 7i •`d� ed ' = 30 5 dh v o w o•-� O o ti'kvo �,2+ "° 6. °•x$ue d �.'d�U w r� v :od4aa'iy y`k � U .5 42 0 !, P s N k 3 .� C v 0 U C, °� u �F°'oU• .c�' w uci� Uooid m y 4o.'StiE. F x w $d 4 2 g Cam. `c u n3,V z g ryb �.°k•5 E'S abeam a o Q °K'o 6ga'$na� d •� •$ c y °ky`kd "" °�mvQ tr o µ, o.im a. `�.. ^. .. o'S, m a `�d °'� �.�'�.o°��Eg � � F�CC`U o°, w �c" U�o '�5 Q�vc i� z � N•°k • n+°e°iUO•EE..K d . .°', aV�4 .N • .5u • � °uNV c, ry • b° N o a o 0 o a N O NL- N C N C N 0 N ns N N w @ C O O c N x N - N O 01= U U , O O N 0 U C N d N O f0 N C 0 0 0 0 a 4 `m 0° a m Z� >.�U' 0 o:c a c o 0 U = 0o Nv_m = U N j �4=.¢ O N O U a d w p, C V t0 (D O E O O O G - O ?� w o ❑ N N 00- O m Nam CO v =o W.- m c N - O >..L.. Ea d> .o yam O NL'r d d c >. 0 a00 N c = 'a m C~ d O O N > O N O N ya00a N y C a tNi! M ti0 N N QN O C ❑O an d L N U N N w U c H Of ry w O G d N -V C W N L y b V V W S y Vq U l Z; G u V S z v m •y ti 2„° y tg o at Una d y t" Vv °n�9 3 it N � c� �6b..a '� y C aq U O O G �UtiCi5y5. co ° m OD'eO i3 6 u '4Uy.o m n ? 0 8 0 b° b e t X « b Pte. itl m 0. 00 v1 0�o y ° G^ % 0. to o a.yo `c '°o'° .� �o oz � �m •°• � eU � U� o � r v �'" c �?w u c5a a a c as °e 8r: ' p, °•g °v c -° ;, 'm �` •$ �,$ �•yI «°' t°O.yW dJ y U b $ 3 ORgLq°° ° c e N Fc to a a o a o a @ 0 C _ 0 0 N U _a_' -= 0 L O N c �y 0 caL 0'O >• 0r La`. @ N p) U C r L > @ G @ M9- O @ U N @ 0 L L p n N a) 0 0 N 0 a 0Mi C Y 3 0 0a y C N O > > U @- C O N c L 0 0@ E 0 .@., a s ° o m c U) @ U c O w @ y Z.2 @ (D w @ a ai J: a) (0 in O N a0i y N 'ooa �z @E o.OE m m c ° c w ;; a a p c a U E! ° gi 4 0 c Cds � tl cp �6 pY T > A r L m b A G b m 8 b m w � U S o y $ a g m tl a tl do;,ee 4 � 4 i 4ry U c v° F (O c 0 �'� o$•szCY v ��bU"r4F e � b Y •• ey.�to3e$ _ tlU ��.°Q• o � 4 m.- .K..�3aotl A b S b ti C b UO U tl d a•= 4 � os•o�oe•93e u b° y tl >. 4 Q a 4 b• U F 6 i C b p ° 0• G ly • U° q�U a oU N c O t a U w y m 0 0 0 E L m E va=c = @�o 2 U-° = OvQ C a � @ O 0 C O c a co w co > c >0 ° n @ E a 0 E N O N 00-00,E n@ X M 0 0 O'= c 0 U) 00 a aj U L O. @ @ > 0 - �-0 >0 a CL C) rn c�0E c @ 0 a 0 0 can E 0 E._ U= 2 =UU 'o ca m0 0a Na O U)�� cL C= C 0 c �o °yLU °'mca@i 0 .@c 0 a(D a°� ° V a@i c-a!�+ -2:, O N C U Y °° @ C 5 30 �_• 0 0 a@ t >O O L a N c> C 0 w O N M a N 0 L >> @ N 0 C C O U 3 O L N O@ C 0 a s =@ O N -Cl 0 c N 0 0 = N 0 N N O O m N C top 0 0 (D T 1-2 c O m�`°ZmZO o 'oO�a o�M C >O C X N N N N L E a O. U L L t00n a n m U° Y C3' "c' •O ° A ° A A U b ° O U " °b r C O° 0. ti 4 W y b Ej x �°• 4 Lj -0p V S mo b A v y U b v o V u 0 v.n N •�' N a aasbz vbi m �E c d o m ° o r q0 y ° o o .X s G o L U � x C � d C «m y °•�°.. �•� •Ab..E 0 x a u o o y p$ m CEC '° •O A itl '� «° m O O m N y 9 O. O O p Q y •O C T•^ O� •S �_ ^ V .> 96 n m w Q O .o i 9 5 CC O b O CJ •d V W o 0 o b Z y o > m e ❑ ❑ O �'� o$•szCY v ��bU"r4F e � b Y •• ey.�to3e$ _ tlU ��.°Q• o � 4 m.- .K..�3aotl A b S b ti C b UO U tl d a•= 4 � os•o�oe•93e u b° y tl >. 4 Q a 4 b• U F 6 i C b p ° 0• G ly • U° q�U a oU @ O w a `O �'w U aiZ @o >, O aui �aF o d o °- E E Y m_. O o C7 3 y� m� (D F- c E.: Ora @❑ >' > E N N Oa O V O -NO 0 m @ a 9 c @ E @ Y O O O U N w Q G 0 N L O `7 ❑ U N N @ @ N o Ur ca C@ a, N 10 N C 3 w N O @ _ O ❑ w _ 3 E "-O ) @ a = MC >rU o � ON =o w c °o. 5 a Oct) c 0 C @ @O)N. h C N O a U m'O..L„ @ "O N m aa) E cc '3m E O O 0 m , -o Ol E U N C O> .� O) O "O U N C Z m @ E nn O y .O U U O E a N :E �= w Q E O3 axi= o MOO O O O p � U [.. a u q u o r4 i. tj a", � ' 0 3.,,,ds �+nndU3 A Or°u,c =' 5vy$33��y4 n u b r h u .4u H96 vs.� ,�rU gg fi •- F3 `u Z o C F u¢ u v u a S U 01 4 '3 m� yo 3 u'` .�.^ouis 5•"u u 3s eu? uH� r 3d � a,u�i ne °~°U y3y�3 d`u•fiu, dG o:� naa° c,°ee ° 3 ua h e.r • o u u u r� e u y u•uog eg u o h .do fiy•; `� c .ar.w�$+ �•0`rV z on`dsuyxprd� Es amveo.o x-43 d o� v v8uc U nuC "fib �o c•° tl4 ti"i•01.Er r4$ .14 Q Cd 01 5 u °U �$['fiae c °"'yc 3 e'R oa ti� � u3 ¢c °d. n o� 'rteeCtlu Q 5r'A ydm,�od°�"o� i �s oua�d`>d>"d' m c'3u��w •3 E abunAUs H O C ai X d V .'S y� d �M $ y c e .� u N fi zi C A d° V 4 C •O bu a b c 4 E� j t c C,73 cv, y.90c1� o v� a Y �.3 ie ,fi4 o 9o2+hiVo U a5•o d.U°. �uVC� 9�b wwur`e� $rdCU�SV o•,o$3yV utlu mair`'? oohy.tl& ,robyd °g� =s�' -:3 m33h''c`� 0 o m ugo= dV�'C� yC1ur e $ ` >w° y° ?ay ws9 `croo07 ma 2+.er$`�,:3'``ua uZa° `y 'i c^ be" .14 ' i 3 v •=`J 'ti d ::g `�• � `oU Q u o ar hS75 `� c tl :' c•.. v'•�afi u qea u � ,cam qR,«•, 001 u o 3�`d ~�°1� is o'uS::o n ne h d. u Q. y s c m °0°. a. bo °o uv5�ugo o0. paav3eit U'sUmsy,c `°•eu as E6 Z ° .a u w} u h o u n d y" : o °u c r s •D h: 4^ u y t fi y no. �^y u n°'u. ' F '�Z01XU`2 � R• 'o w° C h ti q.`ud . ` r V� u a ' u y ti bfi°'u.ti` i - �C ufi �U V. Vh14. oq U Um 4 � c� y •`e°, I V s ad n '``"c • 0. hu y+, �: fi ;`3o b°^ u �' a .`�o 7 + h•�^^''lu ° b 5.o .7y�a' , 4`O �y u ��V ° LO F U • ��� • en 4 V of a U b a '� d t"c u n u U� �' b y oo d2 � e 6 c� � a .°. d N ] d ❑ ❑ r ❑ ❑ O w T 3 U c m 0 T T mgt .N aLd U U N U w m �.• .a .a = a m 'O G 0 a>i c c a m e N N y L w o 0 m 0 Y w m d N IN y E > > O > C N mQ E O O aU O E-- N >.Ow L L 0.... T N N LL '- @ @ mo"mm'8 0 m cU �N m.- T a N N C U I- 0O a d C w N N m L a m °a n -5 omEm�'m� N y O m..L C N w 3L.. ° d -mo N ° C c c �> yaW N� y C C C N a@ @@ O O m U U) C y N L m (D U V N e w m 0 LL y m y -p -O E y @ U N O a o a N a c N m o �a aai� Z`c ° y a°i m aU 3 N O N O > 0 0 a 0 C y (/1 .- M c m e LU - a y a J D N � O n n r r ❑ ❑ ❑ v t 4 n u � a v vo�y 3a �`•3 a o qa ! JJ S V y a � se�do b Y e e°e C Q ° d u 0 U : ° Uo.`d.0S v 4 y o U o Z 23 v a 0.4 °tS.o ti ti 0 I a ° N C O a `o c >m ' a� O OV > O m N y N Q O a m ammm�omm NNO+• >>� a0) 3: we LL> 3 m LL U o l0 -O ❑ m m C N C U O N N N U m w y "-N-O _ @ O y r co E y ° O m p y Q° n m m a a m N o d N O. aU c 2@ a- f/1 m d m f� y m y Q >.E 0 a2-- 0 m C U> +L- E O U (p 0 O' m c y .m0 C C N '-N-O O C G m L m @ > ULL `� v�LO C CN m -LL L N m O N O -E.2 LL a C @ U m T C y E @ O c N G V 0 O V y m 3a 0 O N r W �m w E=.,T Cl I N m c m U N w I a N a O a w N E E U N w w U N N T d � m U y V o m a� m m F- m N 6l n � s '� c m$U Q a e z e v mri�U 3•.° -. V ° b °v a °''°n � ,fin. ` s c ys a y p" o m d b yy° a d 0 � CS y ° ° ° ° v `o °S°o Qu o �> m� 'a°za �u m b w y o 2 �, it bu3� Q. o °c °°, - °°�.vumv c ya,a�o4c > 'veyaz u K u b m a w Z'uv «.`yea '3 emc `401ec x eScea3`v m v' @bWrd :: tc, °°'il•i « vyi�, c �w v OISV� o 4 m c y at to. ° n 01 -yam a° z • C�tF.'°. �` • -C V, • d.'i • 4 C.S.. i Y OP O O 0 0 0 o o o p' ONi a a6i 0-0 00 fl- m�+m mm�> oupi c w 0 O W e O m C t0 3L. O 0p m >. m 0 .rq 1 c w .0.. ° 6 C r0 t0 'O O m E N c y w L@ O o (D mom cmU w mOLU� 3 >O 'p N y N E 0 o m 075 N N2i .O 0 m ,U a p_ C .... U m 0) . 00 0 a O O. 2 3 0 m c ,: tq N `O .a m (DM- 0 co °� - M Nm 00 @ ur y a '0 Co m c O c y O L U 0 O -5 m CL E o N c =. (DU _ a0U Ea gm `—°ma msy _ E m w m m N N O N 0)a> �J y > moo wa .)C0 cmi�c°3 d� N ° 0 °° U m y N= O N OJ 00 W ❑ ❑ ❑ g d °OI$'.^�°..�W °'� Y ` o. yob zU 3�?�• ti .5 a vas Ee m W dm •.°a vC .0_'• y `fi o '� c w m no °0m'no sy ye �3 :� vgmbm � 4 � �m9 c + 42 C 4, 'c S O, g 3' o °y' 42 •O^ ° :•; E `u Q fi v so fi eat ° v o'$ °v v mm y� S � fi mWWx •Sn p; °�q m ti ay ,,. o .� :: u014= 'S``i°pi o oU «W a `�99 aci .mod$ v o tlo vW4�''o 6gedy oU `•' v > >, a cd «° c�4c°� a sUGU ubzU�` �d ° •v�� c � iv °D v 3 �b a gOg .� 9o5�g..ae =rs� `o >�v�NO m °c v �ca> w 'o p n h OQ N C` y t �?• C ° O E C .� mw rN A y y $ S C b w G ;£ O V .•d, T p° vi 9 C v� C i b •y e°i `•ti y av4•fi°. C�Ci� 0 u L O O °' 4 n •� w N 'O °° Q O W Q u TY N v ° U =U o3 m pa roCV ay o °0= q ,00uu5?bb$c y � a °•m °'�b� y 66 CaCO� � �'�°�: � {6�1 Nw�~ y figg !� o fi [ O � .i°i• $'y y$. � "°' L G � y w W 9r� O i. 4 G7 2 W.1'' 43 O a•v °`° .. at�C`c o. =� yam• vy$ F$`o o A .� A O. m • b r N N E n 4 �o 0? ❑ o co ❑ a C T @ N�0 w� d "xL o n- @ 0 3 ai U@ m @ E o m� mo o o n LL Z T@ N N C U cc E CU@ ) N C d @ .d aN @ .@ U t0 O N Cn r O N N a N D G N c N O@ T n N @ s O _@ > iO @ @ U `O OE( D-- O 3 @ @ N d N N i L MO- - N w N O) a�Ea@i�3�oc -XaTNO yrnm 3yiy @ MnumoO�a .�o @� @� cm�a L rN@ma('E��c ya aNYO� a ca=�ma0 ym'@a omo a> WC) c p a N N O C a U_ n ~O Z U j N @ O U m w N m o c Q °- 3 U m N s° a c7 M O d@ M V— O N -O = d N O Lp N C6 ON W �M s (f @ N (D _ @mLd -a a,0Cmg O CO Ma)0 @ M 0_0 doN �maOE�Ua - >3� N i a c OL r0 @ULa�N ,m m , O am O O U E Nd E a m mumi - Cl) mw @ V 21 N j- � V N ) X L @ M '@ � O@ O N amam- d LLo o n�3N 3 @ c m 3@ FU o m o rn o m trn E c.� d m N L ai '- Om m w @ O U C N @ m °a m oO c rnm o o ` ro � ro O O � 3 �y y.5 =V a�°i i-:; 9 vw: o m._ _ s s c °�v R4°, " a` 4v`3 eC7� °auyry aO s lti .� .$E °eye V 4 c° v o�4 rx Amy �r e y e o° g ° d elms �tio RF'°b y c °e ..❑ �9u Rb3 v q R v°p, e h v> o d °> V �: 3 b 'c.. ° b ['N' ry u V 3 A-41 v E o. 03o c °- m v s I � y+ O9 U R� V 0 C7 •7 O 9 O V d y N QE m4 w o�ku•po p��u � °' R >'° c aUCi 'v` o m =m'b �> ;�;33 4 °� ° b r `y vRi v E e c c W a 3 q "e v d an d tom, c v •> v ° — E +..L'' „ E w 0 m OM 'S d d�N� fin N� � VI NNN� � ' N � .6O •°.1r b m M m� Q 'O N' .�.. 4 $s O V �p • .O O U U • 1i O� C Y i d M ^�y y P O G q < O 0. < U W s n o n u >.o .s o-v: Z .o y 5- >O WG.�h�UCS.s o 3 GCO .,b„O u•�•�O�`my U�o N P4 ° w m 4 u i ; c s h s •° s m o `V o s 3 tiuyoet vs5 ° n4 °� �� s• °uw�dszWa m St W Y uti �.' "•Y u u R u 5 .d..y 'ti „Vb,no, mry o o :g N� >o`'�wu R"' g tiM n'> au Oyu,:; ,ssadW oioi ydmaoRc s boa p'y°��r °tiv�4 °y. d'� s d 01 0 0 ° u s'� `'�v�w U4� 5 r o a ai a�'i '� i o C7 •5° °' M 5° t:u 3 0 y n s o s d o' Q r d y W x r -Om ao�seowsc°�,°ri `ym .�'n �y�a 45do�Zti oqV y O C N> U o U Ol d ti '+`U. r N a> w o d 5 d ,�,>. y m G '+��. C o La• G y .'�.. i o �a m .n 5o�wo�o C�eu sa hu y.a > u° a•.. °eo ,., •st ao° 'y = w s'rta >s s mR ma c >;u V 4y yUuxo�b eC c `m c m .�Dc'r�as =sas e 3 a 'tea a n.� sw m os,s as, d dW o> m m usy`W msU o°i is °' wh s.a s4, o ::o w���o.?;E n01y c =6 y m 4 °O > w .� s s s ,r; n s v h 4 V` o 'o vac a 'o 'ous'�ott ,.. �.a$ Win' .?,os a _� C7 °•„5�• sRO y• � m o�m� m m �Vau?s��er ��•r�`•y m"Woni W's��oU�nv�Uv N 3 cn �w.:: >W r e e4, E Y w a.°> o°or 44 -it o y 9ti? •In O R s> rac W y .tat°pQ c y v E E v �O v� C j fW%C w uJ P. Q Nia d4 "' N 3 1J i aij ;> O d F N m q 0 oC c E qy y• o$S� �� g�g' c itl .E p Q p o Q o 3 •o w o v i O0 y m o 'c 5 �i o ° > > Q E.3 '> �p u s °C y b • 3 ° 3ai a° o •x ^ma C7 ��'d 4vi $�• as yw m ° Noen =v O Li m y vi m v v e u o a 0 U 0. I I I LI I m o co rn 0 J O C N E L O t6 Q m � V C` C �°.�.;'W . m.i 6G m:p °uro $'� a 3 y F 3�2 B� rQj �p p eeE' zr. F+ d m gs �p m0.' 3 a$ m.8 E" m � �� °u�c .F rd• VEn53 ��5�p u G'14 a «$$ r y° me�8 0� m 's nmo 6 9 8fi.°U1Sm �}E �i �gmoa m:. oUwv�mE Ca7r `ri 9e4m'$ 9gpg° �mlm�Ss B �5�� °$`$ 1:150 ' c� E`c ��a ;1 .5 Al'. R. m�,m 6a.m$ Vj S m � i pQ .g $x •�7O 02- o, ° s W TN_m •O C od r is rq W g mm din LO OFT$.F y.� «� Tm��ri� A� O F'om�•Flg�z °�.]�'� wa Eoc tioao AQl'o^ r'3$o:«m.d6 g. «48s ,��'w'm'a mod« �'"9 '�' �'ttm:.., F -5 o.$'a�a n, a) wr m J O C N E L U '�'� �opb•5�.ES9'S o .9� �9•g�o,"°p�p�y�a �3 � u�� "J m °y°,•d tiv �Q � S� 'o �Fo•4e 3'$ o� _ p 6C S pN••'4+ ^ � s m�•'s '� sa�p�o�� n.� rt❑� R4 � ��9.0 m 8�•°O w•a•��lB aw�a�a� °• m a R •88 � T mqq�sCC gyt•,pp°a oC� �'�y,� 2f° •�'R°, p v w a s$ F p yp '�.� OR O S p R •� C 0 :p . � c m LODO V G 3 � 3 E td E� •o. � E v: ^ tlb R« 9 --A v O N pv• .; t a9 � m u o wi A T w 2t-trYy o O 9.° �$ a° O �, g m oBig •�� � ��• of mxs�-a�Ns�� pd 3 O � W � 5W � � 9�t• �GT o 15'x- . vi g�•a ';u I w o !g'J. a Ira 4}�eWO�o•8� 1 p �p ��x ^• aoC�RB12 dill 1112 a_9 R o��yo�py��Yy 9 48 C jQp{ jP�S��• S .S N C m �• N �x��$ep e�pg•�b $'OE �'�U °�3 •a 'v gig 6 G N s � W•e T 'jg x ggg ga� N W ^ 6 C mE�•- R •a t u ti s O J O C N E L U c6 n m v NTq� or°a pe Omm iq � �3- $oV -S :,a m• F'°m «o$ = uU ffim;m'u >�°"' fi _.' m =og3 m m$ o- Tm E5 'u .Z � fi••g3gwDtl,as o`o� «�� a 3- ==t-•� TqOQ i:,t �� � a`QOAOr%i _•S. '�3 g'g�� °� y °��{"mb "3 �`o bs...N�� 93 °e'g= m «l''S$SiG�:fi gff ,g33'Oe ' '"�Q 3 gi ❑. ^WN VVDQ y�' D Q S1°"::5 �- I3 E W"J 'J' ta O Olf u3 0° vii T O a T gp V t ii C E$ W °y QF � � D T -S m F� ^ g 4 0 A r m�� m N g Z. y•O yp� 9 p A Ail a y %fig o« •41 ° m �� � m E ° rz °' 0� . °g m�'°a c, a.fi. FJ"co bB$I E'g'g .�m$@x,�E.9�a..q o� >'�a °S3 E.pi •g -5 ° ,�„4 d3'a`°o EQmZ�9EE° ='�o =m °U�°e 'bo Sm'99S 1g ,e noon o �•°2 mUs =gip =p' 3o33 Ewo•ggo g.=- �g9 p�ygwpE AQt- d° 3� pp��j-! • ° -• ° «3 «�sa" as °eV VIVA �T °a0 'a Me ba444e93 v,°0 °2aD° mmfi.no �a m.10: . eV'�'m�i a'y'o'^ a'S2 -ai�.9 °= m•so =°• �8 zy,g =oTo =° �xy�+�o mymmm °aEW_mm� Ku ='E =Eve 3� ��Qa «.- u�m�o•.3�`� �- /rC�'tdrmF•a° �mmmo « «° 3 °�S8Ea @ J O C N L U o .�A 2PA°o 8 El Uo Ax 42 ° O y w T' p ci 'ad C zg B 79 'G m O�Nd� e S 3 aSo�E'y -�• •5m ifr a:a'9 0° a.°. °� ;d. `�j�m.w.ro8aaPj'a�g �•m -'s E b .z A O •B O T �'9 6 , sEfi QE +d Ea d S� s.2 g ig .1 A T' es�c °° r[P .g 14p ��a'S. an.2 �°o•S §S� X3'7 d Boob °5 ^�60' °��� g4—o�v .. U E nm ab u •� a %q.5 m, �o aw o r,' o �x Rfi4d @&'o.,E v'$ L,`�3• ��.ippy b�_��' a.E�9� ��u ,��' ,c'$ m3a ng•'� §Dma �a Bi `Hb SU `� ,°� ^' "d y$8p.q s 79'�Epo 0x' Qai'd..b aso a�o•eyz�!aa3 V'`�°'"fco~b •�"b�^p m c oFt'(i 3 �i '� ��Q w �'G— IyTyyi •tyg� Q�q m:�i' asp �a1 q� 9.m •C Vj !�( ]( ,'I W .p i R My''�j •p •6 m �e��OS�'.'9 �NaBS 0�9�'p�• 6T�i�iaaiv� ,.56- :Ggp$a'm�'•ii,�Wd9 �ggPPO�'3 'Ee g�fbm•e oq silx U jk sv 3 aow w���j�m• ° °aOa 6awd o? c y�3 S =xJ, a �ai "J•43L �� y ° 44 -a �3aoo°8 ua?b $e E w R "ma��geam bap.33omr mm�e' oQ m�o,W.9�osoro>.&'�a a'$'� Ec m�.goaa w'�•� Q ?o"'St ov °�c« «m•�:ay.R m... A U EBB °. '°• N 3 , ? b 0 ° E 3u �3y..v �'ai '4,bm�gC•�.a3 ��e,p ''rjjr����_v8�C�Coy u a •Oq mygg C'OOmam NO n° ms�9 J O C N E L U GN Fw o Jul a Iga m o 9 a WA mI mg y. J 9i.q� ° J T cl $ ° > CO C E gi T m d5 3 'O � Ga Z F .fin' '3 .° � •O {Q U W gg 9 dd •g v ,� � .�3 uig5 x.544^.. •a 30 rooOd Ell A'm -8 •j im�` 8 9 9 0 0 2 G o 8o0 d•s�a ro.> Ti tC s"�ao °aa �ugro cw $'iy —S• 8 W tl ^ 1, .3 c•OO� °•o g O �ro3L3�pp m Q• = u as J m o 7i Q p mw EO L F W • i 2 V° w> 'NA-8 X'9w J O C N E L U f0 Q eE sr YY'`o..EgLU nm qm q <�3y b »im. -.E 9 •� 1tlY 'C '93 mv. ®X a� m mp9.p y�v.� u .�cm�m�O'9003 nT.�.c q3 px.� 6;g o 0 �;�^I�tj ���t2. '.J �� �_ 1!�'� >L WmS"J'���yT� G�L•���� �y0 O •O �`tlY[ tZ2 PC L rj O 'O AA !L gm 5i °ni t6 "9'g SS ., o0 8m � •�, �Y�p e � �� $� .a., 5w0�+��� O 3 agm97'epm� T mmamma o'app 2•- Bo`d�u� 0 7g tq3 glf _pp q a�a�'o °eo m _ �9i •�• $•_°:._ • 3 ym $y� 9g� yT m�m E,mO ,�a G p"oZ �'� �•pg �d o up y`a TJ 0"0— up •8p9 9 Lgm� t� p �, T F Tqq 6q > Fig_ pq ^p®g 8$$i 4 ,�y��a �33.�'m�B:d •.�.��U RI ^.���'" @'4`a eon mgr T t & °�' j CAN m ?' 2 0 9+3 .a $ 3 �.Js y' = o 3 qq tae m a°•�', gg U �� ., °�E3 m '� RH I �g�ccc °�$« o,r t°i. •sgE 9�'Sa$�' [•.� �� aom� ^•O °ma w.6v504 �3$a's'3'�,`Es ouY �, s=a''o Y$• � 3'9 pp w ° B $S2°mgac. �m m O a o.';noQ°�.,°. a� 0 a� J O C N E L O t6 879 4 Q m � y u Nm2�•9w °a — 9.8 a�� $„ _5$ «o .J E f a o g $ m CL Pd -B T V Cp p LL N B s. y •°- •� ° �«' _ S G S m . � a C _c � , { � m VJ a � � 5 6 N � aFg '�" � � � �N 3 •� G .ny oa— 3N �m 11yy o9'm m'p 4. .d G q ° zV: OAT gjb�M «9 �RC m U13 .4 E06 y N •°e Sv° off' 8o mmE �,S o�o ..3 mro�3 3 m� � 8�p'� m e n =� .'�Z'� �v my4 w°3 C a� N �i' 9 •• m `em"o.m o 3 u�`�5 8 wa. ' � ,i gHO ka' ti 0 m J O C N L U f0 O E > N f •�j. b" a T13' V A .ilC0 m" to O iSBoo -dB�O >oV g s�b �P33 o"o BPI g � � y •XXX6gww* O O In O li `° �f yJ ,� YY 7 J� .. w ,�o s 9 g a 9 C a X O v OM ° wa'o mu�°;���•4S 3.9o3•�`uo m e ,SYg" iO� ��{j ng'w aoOa "qoq •2O8 .9 .' �S @"o��'d,•5b pp m •- $ `'Q oT E d >°. +P.3' c� 'o o �i .� � 8 3 .0 'S •� a� 5� w g m � ffi �sI��g�� a sS° o d 0 - 2 8 3v 5 E 0 � �98 .tiO 'D��'•c `oa v SH a � �$•o � �:L• 3 •9 zNN �d. mC p o hh a 5 1 F SyS O O" E w •S g A W g a °u O �•��di� y T 16a 8 ^ ' • A e� G Q a'yy p •pCU •W by �j�.ry �a�WU�gSo •yg�.�y�� aUy�G+j °� �"�Qe�p .yW ""m ^ �OSV1O M V• �" I ip SE� 83° 8C So am 3� °C go. a 1ym•�5 ��+ u � $ G ji u °pea �.y: a «u w 9`3 flay.• Hwy F. �9 N� ti'r'J9'J�t•0 --s 41 3m EQ�c Nu a� G A8A A R a !n !. m J O G N E L U [0 Q rz a AAA s ;,•� e 2 �$ A o'Q °a g o• •a° w � �'° x v r'E °o o J3 ; 5'' $ 4 v Lod 3 13 RJ , 3 groT �ppa 9� n c $•$ba wo ok 8 ss r x �op E ONq��g E% �•$'J •Op � .� ��,T '3 � EnE� p 'b Eli c a s ,j roa 3 ro o' m d E T a� T e c° d e E e °o °• 8° e 03 m a. F m ,'o °>. v° a� J O C N L U Q w .30.8 ro X03 �0��°°°ns _. � 06cQO Eel yypp �" «f].y°A•�� T� p_o p 6 W Ag O � O�W O•�u �G 4�u.. ��O C Oo- ' E W u>p ohmg ze�� .9 EQ�.9� c Q38 d yi T Wyp� 8T0 �iig$93 �'�$ 'S pk SO Oq O C� OIC > W o u - a O (.. ° « ❑ g'= a°3o�E N . I II p « ,q p 0q. 4" 4 p O `� 4. b{ %. ° 7 O E 3 .S '¢. I'1 Q3 .`° 'if O p p �. ° E o g Tai �._ n.. C! � �. 9 NO 0 °°v U ,2 � Ewmo« a° 6 � ° ««oj8 r m taeE2np'wkoda . s ^m e a E E R1% T eso ;�= E 3 �ti 3 Bm'y 3 'e 3 B'8SmE3 �8 orb. y°,_oE e• a p ,g a 3$ u ,+�� a �°i ps eo:3 p°'E�3 «aAep n V U Z m U �o «E$ V.,.3 a cE',A3m'Ca 8 .28 p U i (3 OS 0 a a� 0 c E L m Q T},' M� U U y 7•G ,G U 3 �o O'`14 S •`oa x.93 .. • o 0 a�doa �,� ��� 3 � � Q �_g � rR Z�sm�CT is 39•'� g u a � � •� � a A �s � � �s =•�o � �a .a � ��d] �yT�o+ $ � l� � 3 �� � U��•T mT a �f �V aS � a � C yC q v u g q � q A •R y v� .+ v e m W e .tea �a. •G t 8$ a �- F e a 0. a• F po o m a o'3 `e m WAR D a� J O C N L U t0 Q 5;.13 A giy r0 � •° M.Y. '� T° G.m N T'm .Y.1^ .N-. � 8� E g E V p g 0 AS Sg3 ° 9a 9 m. $d•r g Q RoEoSq 3 t EX PG �u,gU Vic, z °o �ul C7 R1 a Riau °E° �tl p B� ..$ s$E,@ °a °a3 5� m9$ g g ,y •,�n.$ 8 .1 E « a E v'u�p�, yv, � °a2 u. e�J vs ax T1j �"V � apu k' c'c eo x"�'•p°�3 v L I 0 J O C N E r U M Q �yT'� e � M1� � � C_ • S pp O T 0Oy W5 .iL'. ,� OCi qgT �Sy3 Jj ° 37 �5CgM 9 z• 6 (�?.• N'� e= _O .S ii �O `� C p A � � � .� 5 w w .� .� � • 8 sA E° �P33e O •3w� .fe�T ,�, 3� �•d �� `�' �.S�o �.g� .t�MSo �3�'�Q �•$�'3� .'•:q�iTOp�Y�y. ��p 'y?�� � OpGppp� °U o $ 5 8° Zo ° x�aE �pp �'6 "_��, e�o� �$°9us�a.3 a'..�° 0'9 � •_�� c03g C� W 19 ns U°n.a O m J 0 c E L U f0 Q r $ Q "o •? 0.5 v�S Qi',v°$ °'. 0'9 °s °•�°� �'3 �3 v o 3� Mwo °• °> ° ."' Q fp >i tip _. E yp y T r° �q YjE `i '� � 4/° 3 N m pg V to �O_pL' >��Ts'Qe�a9 > w. i'` .G� •� O S .� _ O O T$ Y Y 9 O a A' «R S O O •g pp � o m TS96 cFao °aid n �i >. ��= p � y��J' � c.. � � � � � •P� �i Y �� i � �•n � y�� � Wispy .a t Ppp9 �' hPMO• � Lm u a q «p P t-��. � � � g � � ° a� a � O pp� � $ tl >�� A. Y. Y� y0 �� SSSS _ �u m_Q•y3 .2 '' &� mF Ol�riO6 m•�a0'� ;Omo E°g,'- °�s`� ->'y. °•O 9 ,� •o v °uer�pV 3& np $cvp F Si°.�d3 �>�+y�OOOyo...8c�o py° qF'• ��p°.. L} .".S T Syr .i aWN 6T°yp2�� 9q °�Vy m S ii J ri -� ''Jre > „ G G Ny e -rpm' �°• 9 $p. '•°uY «o m3y'822dOOO v$q.3. V •�j ._ 9 V E �° E S'v o m 9 m Ai w ° r �. £'''°•ea �3°WS'raE�.�o'3o W. v° �gBU °oU °2E�3 u fi� gg 9� e'`p��3 no m 5 _T �S � o �om°�'•�a 4,5'-8 ° -a. a em v °�' ^pgij o�v 3'���{F3 a•av ��3 m$ ` FS .m.. ° 69�U a�SCC'9m � U'a«.9 ,�" U._a•9 °mac Y��$ � � 3�w °omT> > > °a eta �= �12>°,�� -�r� 3m qt m y UE e w 0 pia �mn M;= o E $ m ,y mP c a y u bar c�Yr� It CK._ 8 v m 3 d v m a fi U O 0 J O C U) E L U (0 11 >•E - oa3 1 ZIn , m�amTmB��• 704 oS0.ola11vs m' M .V q �Elmmyo m •?O =m �o § Pm =$ on a P Enm'S:g 3 �3g9 g s o �r$mV>.y a3g?S eoi iGV �gO m�gE.§i. U$mPV °��om «° C'a my Ow s�•S a� °a ..•S�T E 3 °°E�m$ c4"''q EEbff C33o�� g s e gg �JE S SS19 a pp 1p p m E ° m a ; ge �Q r•a m°,m a ,Eq .VU3��°>, IM MIA] E S aw���ag� o r T -A °u s..-U d Qm °3383 a= w ° �4•�I�o 2Eyx �!m.rI ^^11m� W P RP •O P� 0 3 0 � i4 rr9. S .O+'.�. P F 9 a'�' VJ C w OR 9 A 3 a U a w ° sV a •5 �a s3 i q �U o O a> J O C N E L U f0 Cm Wy 4q�Cjm m.a ww cy�+E pe � q ugW q��.9e. sio u.I > 0 u v u •9 � o aai�9 oy� a4 w3 m R9'A Nj a •5�$�O�o �' o 6 O oU mroS °w a�� 5 aM 'O� Vggm q o�g S o 3 8 m z a u 333.a9c gilt. s� a aE'okE's3e °VW m e 0 o 3 3 3 $ o$ U � V-g ggg�s0°�.v C7�ao�w G � m ee 53'� oU�v� qm b s w�� S7S�5 =m a$pWs�s $•� .d JI a wmg��a3 N .4b '�•� u i.9 m AM msam m am eq �.'s3 N J O C N L U m an d E N 9 mw'6 q a� •SZ m 9 0 0 >�ymSago gfi .2 J^T� �"oe �wpo ii ofiwy aav 0 0 v OU �s3� g�3m 0 t:p�'C9,E gms;x A9 S� m'au �q w U m o i war s 31.2 +0 m �° m m H o m 0 99A U _$ bt aol d ss w�ggyy� m d o U ���;• �:m�b a'g� � � s m9 w cSfi ° _ s 0 s So rv*j*l jig ^d v s Ei •- 3 E S m o s' m m eo � '� ° 0 9 qE a .°7a•`�7w�.a -:: n °Om wG U OF U ._ a O d a 0 eo O's c E L U [0 Q e U 9 �•,� ? o T _ c �, m �rb;e' Zo 71 WM1�v '3 }aVUv a eiE �•� v o 5, � � •a° .4y � o .$W sstt o 0 °g �w9gEW��3�8 3 I� pli W y s 0 .'O T^G CU U O 'O u pT 3 pa'0 L Y W ew vo — a kw� w Q e�{ 3 tai a la+ v0 d _2 0 W � ° k' a J O N C N E L U (0 Q • Y 7 g W� � N a� �ai > N 3 O e e O 6 q Vq O O RR-S br'C ^� NG EP:Yq O Y q 4 m N,�s '.... WO •C B a W O. tq wd 9 sy VV ^..! m GEo '.���5 e � p���9 ,�. .� � 8� 2�`.����9��.�•���Y ��u��� �`aeb �Y 3`� °3Sr3g Ib o r ' r t •o o'2s3 ii .5 �° >�o ��u q3 ° q8 q8'q§ a3pa e� 2 i PJ wWU W�$Sw o{� im AW U �G•�3 3U_Uc L Oa y C1 M < Vf IG l,� m q .r. .N+ 0 _ N n T 1n C.7 N C7 Q� _ � .+ •+ - �+ ^ �^ � _ V tV N CI Ci CI J O N C N L U Q N W N -C O N Q Q G � 888 a •r� Big z ed� a 2 sm :14 v 11 la iS !tgg a ° g mot �8S L� as j 5J.P P Im UT paw�a> >m Rv A��j���S URDU Ci o C7 n eN•i ai M M V 0.� < v a e v V vi vNi vi �rpi vii v�Di J O N C N L U Q u $ Ed V `m ° i y y yw °0 G q 12Y J �'O �y�.Y SYY �s+ s �A w •g o$'�g '9 � �9.9 S Mp, ou 6• wo ° r •� o'�V W'°� 979 •�q .� $6c �_ 3 •Q y9 E a a € 859 ,JAN °-3j 0 0...I •� u � 0. '.°. ° x q � � � w 0 � ° p � � B � 2 •�R Z 9b r7 v _ n w a ffi a N U M•G �W�G G L � l� n!� � 0.�iw CJ MP N J O N C N E t U f0 Q 59� y •° � � 'S O � m �% � a3 ° � Ti � m tl •$ �j � � y ba e WS�3 m i. l Is 94 � ° 8nr•� E� As Q S P P Q 6 O N V � N .• ....� y V n 0 0 N m � � J O N Ei C N E s U (0 Q m U� m a as a s��s8iissg� 8° o b m 2 m a p 'fibN !�. •E ° C c o° a Fj' 9 'o b 'S '�,1 0 3n 8 � aim ° _ Ya w 3 ab '3wm d a 8ea cSi a9 a °'��' g� a� °�' v � � b e���• •s _ m ft Its sL'�a�. °�a9ffia �w oms Bg �Em 8' 9P: g 3 cif $w` a8d &g U.S U3U °x._338 6�c° gg V m IT v. a> J O N C N L U f0 Q ° b a m � d a mL• V G Qo gopp o •� OL ° pp ° O u � b 6 •� V� a .Y � . E. S C A p6 'g ywtl� qq° ryp q1 � Vs � 4 � •�jUa .Yj .��j '. O � a y, 6>•9 9 �lYi 9Q FOI IL �G aY �Aa � � w 5 p G 6� m0p yg � Ea k am 3 Lp J ehb ? > ° b ° B Y}��o+• U � ■@ 4 r O. p e ,p .a io e a oa e•� 30 °a°1np a o •° ° epYeY ` oa $° a0 ,�5^ W a g� W e Ila� W ]°�� W°'L' s9pap eu ° v �g �pp �C� $ a'i� °� i •�yG kv Spa ra •° QQn Cl a N w r m 'w $ U1 d J O N C N E L O f0 Q O 6 � � r � > o o � � •3 e � O •O w C�{ •$ .Q. 'a C ,� � y C � yes 0 O V 4 E 'a O q 9 yl Al q {� v C >i .r O• ri O �.° u � 46 agg � B . a.a ` � o —bb ,q�q Y'o yy�i z ��wo •g� '$-gg�q0 q8q � 888 0 � pn e�5y No 0 y'2 .� - a v Yi b oQ o ap w r c E Ji ELI ass �a °� w s °��4 � s�•��F�'���„�5.s.v „� Sri '� °,5� Si ?: w q r'L g.• 0 E. 0.'.x N w °8°c �« �� � �gsd��x a �� O O O QQ — N C 1 N ry C I I V N O M r. `m m J O N C N E L U f0 i. Q ° •5 o g '� E a � % 0 u w 46 p$ b ay 52'U °' w�ai�e21 e� fit C9 All ,y p `"y� 6666'•• a w aS b � E •gg_ � o• 'y g'� m .�•�'w5wg 3,a�5�.e �y_� •9 a'o' v° R7 CY s �3�U;9 v C�mcB °a° ��'0.�y�ypp 3' �$4 -•��W 8 °° '�•ea � Soq 'o r°,�'o�� °a '�•�Qo._,•'S :O °'U 92a E3 g8= •v y �5r� � � °u.�•� u a a > �dWm$U.E., �7 cmU o�3V mU 73k7 v lH y P7 's G1msT V Cg .e E'$b oo N « a._a o. N N N N N N N N N CJ MN N N Ci N N N w O N J O N C N E L U Q P Esc o az `� ° w Yop. •q��' ° a !!!...-- �ygygyq��� 9 s 0 ¢ O w .e 7R Id 2 ON Al t.0 jais 10 a g 3 .fiC VV!i S$. A F 6 g ° U L 'a e c. .o L' • �. �° a •� n x .. 01 1 • ° ^'$mo FI K._Cg wUa � U$�U eU ur f V._ E a E o. N M N N N V N N N N N N U Si N N J O N C U1 E L U l6 El T o v _ 6 N al 'S� 3 9�p3 SaA w fa. Lt W Tj .9 w 9e� �9 O W L m 9 ON 'fee sQe p WC e_ 9 .9 O U Ci W a c� O 9 � � m o � a' H s p gi s o g�g > 3 OV 5i =�ymg'i 6 3 � dpOpi pp¢ SP V 6 SP E 2 m3- $ 3 $H a $ s& a' dO 8 33b'�ap I Ills HE Ug v tV (V C! N CI C! a o� s� P a; Y `Wn 38 ro v Q o� ° i 9� Yr oaTc M wai O N F w �'qsp a N 6 Eat m m Y }P $ LF o �� w r W ° 8 a N eh Q n r� to 0 m a� J O N G U) E L U (6 Q _O aa p 9 O'er 6� p tl WOb 00 GGG pYO 005 ❑ CY °a EQ$ m y E .p� � 0 Si mo •� m 6y� �9 >y v� t"p C. �rf 04 F �I —}Y�. •phI Y913 -am go pp � C O .bar �"y � yOy' Y •pY � .� � I� a « L m F'� a � a V G� y3 v •app UY� p ri �9p •S ���. yVW 3 .5 .9 � � bT OeO• h '� t�i0 Q @g C ' NNNnnn e � a 9 ccCC a ui r� •wo .' $ B $ • e o ° gg �= tl a _ o 70.6 o '789 g «9 �� w ��•gqq a_ � � 'rJ a y.a v 'b �. g oaN �gg �.EEEgE a �S &•� 3 �' JIM go VE ��g`iA �oO >_m13o �i6Q 4k�sc 'av 5o5aa ��$ 'I �BeL vvvda0 °r9 •��a q°��°, g�v w a c4aa 3 e� w au$ MM 3 �3low, s m l �. O) Hl W 0� . 2 1.v N a n M V ii C C ? v v O O M ci e+ Vl VI N 0 0 N C N L V l0 Q .O O m •Ae 53 � 'S �' a � O m ° R '«�1 Cy 9 i° q CCC dyi 09 9 si 'O O 9 O m � t4 '� m •a � O i � � .S � p sa7gS{uf � Q eq a�� 6,�9 � •� -��m� � � r�1 .qC6 � �6 � 9 �� ••5° eB��N 0 M H `qd '8 0sQ•.r' 8 K $' ` °, 6,8 as y .i o ppp B. g vet c `q w e5a iCu�y 8s. �e < ivm "bus. U Gi Q d dW Mfg ^7a�c0. &w° rYj fZ R1 acv. v.3c N M O Iq b r W O N M M ci 0.b b b b �O b Id Id 0 J O IV C N E L U t6 Q � u -Z3 Z` ,•r�7D Y! .°3 Lr a ?�•� � 3 a Fi c Vic' �T� 5EE3�Lg� ',a�a ��pe V�gE o•� a'7 ,'�O�$•�' $CY ASS �tlr C �" .5q a z � o •p�O' $ p 8 u N }D� y� n f� y >a �Od � fig•= �(�.�� dt� �b3 �. � 9 �. �i q�� Wp Y iA.' Bm d1gD0 g C�DgpC. G A Y9P '0.y �.�$pppg °�'tfgWO oggm a" Y$a ym' g •�� °gvs•p .E 'SSY;,� lie'$ -o q `o $ •d� .y%3 38 yy$u , Q p3 SOO $ V o m 4 •'p� -p. pmp 9 9g S• $ $ m �p ° ga 6 b p C. y$p Z m e� "�3� �OE '^m8 •�•�'SS.'�' .�+«;G�.$,��'GG��,«�� a4 °e� �•�60 4 a u b o q e�1 �7 IT ip 0 0° a •' p pmp .r N t•f < N b t� CO 4l �- . n tiN. A N g�p a^ M C7 a o0 oc o0 0o ao m ai ro «i ro 06 m ai U d V 0 N a> J O N C N s U c6 it mr'1MO � a� FY yd °E. ���.••�O X CI F ~p •.f p ES 9 V .t..4. 9 Faj � J C � m ao � $ �•� � p 6 5% m.9� SP Ig E V m 'NA 0 $v< go �. p tyr ..Tyq. p p • .'{ '2 p .iy0 9 f0 ^ '� •� �d� y� �•G SHg m 99 �0 � �Qu'Nt �appp'�:l '8HHpp1 �3 � o 1 a It pff tz-aiml.1 .2 7j r'3 as `o Ep�a.gr $ g.9 9 °p60 v� oo.� ve $. ''� =�9� pma m a> 9 I R yC Lg C 5, O .s tjSS pQ r3 py 'C.N]p p 0 6'90 .prUU ^y� p pIj y�`•°N pO O 4 p O L) all �a'9HIS a`c'c.c�•���U a�U sio �Um �U �d��V ��g� ° 3oggv m $ SS g55 A. o c7 $�U � E'� �� fie` - �� o•�� 9�F°3.4— a p C R s e 9 3 R 9 3. e N da N O 6 p Cm a o pp a e 15 m � > � JSj�y� -tea Tr IT�F�; ag 4 C r 1v y5. CC L Ogp e 6 QTR. •.gta b a3$E�S gg 6M cl N D a> J O N C N L U t6 Q N � u y > Z �'� � �� s � a a a•�q4 ga� _� � e � o � • q � C ��g dS �YY N � '6i W O 9 c1 > e � go Z aS G � n�•�� pad o o �9 3 $ ae �� ��� � •� � s�� a �'�go`o o J1 Is I o .9 rea Uyyy ON go .Y C YY �3y O C C O q 9 S •p t =0 a yEy P A C C q 4 �j W p '° qy 3 Cg ip yCp G O b �pi u is B'o$ 'U'� o vai U pV o��Ta� 8 QQEQ 3•Eg'a99 Fps o M S �w p`a 333cw a CS gla �3 t� .5 swS N v C7 0. mm m ni m m a Ci 0.0 o v v < 6 D d J O N C N E r v m Q b gaE� °° m `°'a a4miE '�La s � b m it s 8 0 3 a4� o9 IM °a $' 0 •° C SrJ' tSd� yob �At L',Q� 6 ffi GOza 'w .�. 50. �.•�a �. 2 .�' 6 �1 a'$ n •pO '$ d d dl W a ily C° N Yi '°" 'i y •,i O q V L b. G V Cl y Si O bb ttJ i� 5Vy a s9 p 4yy4ee°gam A A gig q$ o d •� , pp C b V eZ �'•� i�� 'w p C p °' yea om lip C � 3u -_ p-° •am ae � %cmgp�C"°'�v �'�ea $ aow � Cnw.�"J •p °5i �`n °� > ,•00 .° p o o e � .�' —'''� � •g� rd Ci ° ° 'g •S 3� m d � F3 8 ui °3a� g gg v a a >a p �� vooOz �g.�y+,�o� 'a a3° aS•�.9°'m9Q —�� a t ti �1a 61q .19 le" W9-4 O m J O N C O1 E s O f0 Q i u V b O q y q ryp p 6 O D 9 C «p L• rd � �` _z1 m u °' � '4' 78 w° 3 .9 rop 3 q ' e o o g .27R z 9 O �yy q ii L UV m U. a6�' > > Ai wt5 m :m v. •O 00 2 „ o � � . T H ;� � _" S. ,gq° tl > a� °o mti`� ���$U' _ �o�5�i' C •a end °' 141' ° ° a v�•$ o• a a epp :2 E �XX$uNtt 'C m `g m w 6 1 6 � � q a� •9 v ° S y °y8 GSG $ ,�� C n O m M N ^J' "' ° O �° G m 'a C° All30« g °io °o'`� C7 Q4 v'�maicSQ$ 1Caiim d :3 ,sm„ ^mlm a ��" a�9 $� � a .�gqv��_5m•�•'�43 m� o.d°� 0314 1. M`o mi '� c� $•`o' 9 •oti�ai•au v aw a a p ° �+ N M < V � b p . V .•• N M b O •^' .+ N M O h D N m J O N C OJ E 40 VE .c U (6 Q o'y�• � p�' �vy3 !� C � •Ei y � q a T p �' 0 C u'� ..gmg 4 � � � Gflp � ti,c a �V •� � u > O e p' O C F It B v ? s `� � 8# @ .� e v y > p m � Y Q 6 go a �S chi �a L'5 •W �Z a� w.� a •� � w �+ egeyy �{ A ;;'I F a AA ,� 14 a n; � Z w A •c W> Q E r� W •5 V i m ,., C! a = E / ! !� .§ � »■ a / k r \) $ !. on !. ± ) \a I Ono \ ))WW ! �! w ■i # \ /�) ) ! . k!)!B0 E . ) . \/ {/ cc LLI z § \ ■`! _ \ § ƒ�!{ �$$� !e&aaZE 4 i a l87; �t -,22f - w •._� Is - - k L k] 22k -E O22�! 9 \ OZ o , B|.�,- 'M }! ;game - t { ee : -a !� #Sc ■a - &/ § ! )§ k §) • @ |/ �``��k W 2 . kk _j0UJ 2 I) a �6 ) )E E ! %( §_§ / ■ !a®sa�; �! @�B§! 2 ! § .# -. CO) ` G�]�o ;;_a -)!a�® /)22w @ _ ` a 0-a- \ /_�,� / d B k § /!�� - I22§ - [ ) f w e ° @ S ' ■0 zq - ¥ ! ! k ƒ� ! H -M 'sa k k § ) §- § #fiow k ■k ■)a /\ � § ® ■ �20E]!2� \ § )�k {k#�) 0 ; 4 § ;aIEE§2 J e . a ® § g �elaa�§ k ill) § 2 m M§; ! ! [ $ 2 J2ak# . d J O M C m E L U (0 Q 3���U = tE� ;$� °E of xtxL =�° amoEQ�rmLS E«°m'IN y ot5 s'r -Tyc 3 E bum o ccmi a��42 `p ;c�m,d : c5 mph M�a 3c'o 3a i°= — mcmm mmaoc oocc°o2m> oo �cmn'a t..EE��oas cU mx W a e C o c�Xca10 afn•o. 4 m E aU p .6oN@'.G � N� m � gEm02 m g O a °x m vm CmQ aam 0: 00 m v38�@ ao° '9 � �m� c m m m E ' °em � E °m o r � w r 0 EJ- 8c :5 MI.p Fm°mvc 0 2.5-& 0E E ° ono= pa mm-�o _ oe mc n3v E mm°� i mw m EW «$ «�a m moUG�N xU FL u° = a s_ cp O EO d g 9 n c O=E o 9wQ m y Sm ^ � mzgo ° 5m > p 22E2 £m maW¢8 =120- °im EWo s£ mc22pc H °B W °O ` mj O t � a O w m o « w $ m c d m mEm M=O 3 dQ @$+mc� c n2gm�E`mi•`m�E Er'`o.`�3¢ 0 E$Ec�2 � pEE.E�Sa0E`° E�y V'EU3:cEv*- =z5 �olEd ° >m� mn i$= UE�j Nnm =�3 $gyp �rn �O �r m'� yrml�t m� A �0 m8U ° �mSc mm nmc mld m e •- rIIC m'm« a Y mQ E� ° SL�j Qx cmm T °o m� { ma�o «g.E •m «xNa c c Q4my0 0 amid icy °a$�� rgo cEm3 a2S°rcS`i�6p� w =x�m E -c�Omm mm� =E�' -`-p 3�w�mE «ca3,4 m"��moNe 'EE�'E`�m0 m « «�rnWg ivcaxm°�omNa �4)'o tm ` E m�vxcm cN U.�U P m°a rm 3N Qm oS=fi $oru � UG ° a.-3mU m 0 J O C m E L U m cm `w°c¢i` ors_ w°. SSm�o @�O� °o�3am98cQ�i'�cc_c�m�i��m>° o 8.cE�c •OC EacLm o.�oD z GL'�mT w gm�ia�nio T Dc mD °Q3 4E m� EOmNO..mB rn c ag-ag2c 8 w v mm ''LODp°'otm30m.Ccan�'ETi$c @�••ym��cc°m K$�o$'ccm� S. Lw r=wC O.mrJ m��C T��nWa�Drw°.m m�mC «��.(g.O CC._�O m mo 3 sm'�a$E° m'mcmmmt'c'Svw@ maw.. r« m mFs = yp c cc�m Tcy'g �5mw�g3 �mfo66 a'''F a °o�mWmE�aav5= C fipw �c�`�=mm ° a c ab Bnm o ow ° _wc3 OLao _= Em2 5mcC�!4N3 Z EE LotmC ,m � C Y °% D m w$ Om p m 3 0 W � Cn�N cL Sc EoT.awaymm`m•2ac 33�$m °iey°OF �o'."c$�m EsLa C�D �n2 MLO S.2 c D c Ew= JD oD WmnL= EcmW><° ta.° aamc $�imrmnu".� @c €mmc'wom�c°w °w� E_ co wL,.mc� t �,s mmm w,QmE.000•c $ma `orDm of T� E•�°'m ymm vm$rowv�SEm ^mx ��ycv mmmn ammo -a`°� x'm M a c m m5 2c ��a aw o rmD c wm mm ¢� m EO �ma3 c�� a m Ea a m m •4 Q mi wao mom om gc UmDmQc r U L � m � o> C7 mEcm Q'Stt oTmw`�wr Cman0 o mwc � gatcm 12 ea �o; Em wm= ��d00 f s Z.0 � o � o s 0 o m —w ov _ om m r O `° m % pO m000 � H=m� m. CUta D°wm � � � 00 O CD Umm 00 m OM. rm W v` � Um �$ 9 ca U wv;s - j a� a m am •� o �mW Ea °mmm� cowmm omom cmmcm43ma £ o E a - E w`5m�Emv ma om w n m.5 0 -S IS a E2 T`� T U8N Gu c m n.52 C gtyj m D D L $ c m .. im m€ wr'1N mom' 8 N °gym= > H t6 m « Q Q� c O m W J O M C m L U W Q qom .5 $a -z t m E ; m m $�$�o6•�.ccW m nIs, $'E mpg �m� s � ;S Cl) WG O 6Nt3a v N���ismq� abn «mo Wv Ez"c� az d m U m ca of balls «.5r r�O�mdm� UommaNEM$ m «�vw W 'a H,4 N CC0 Uv�W(3$og E� 'rsa ccj� E cE :2 cID mow =r:�$$« m�iv $m V m AMR R 0osao� «� UM• 1�y Wm m 4 $ � C. �i C. •m O y °c J°c do c 3: S E c _� 'S a,c9 W J- � o 8 f!�Qaw�aS�ma ms gm m 2 3 5 a° pm. NS 3t gym; o m N W =�c0 � $ c$ W N q T .QQ�b mmV:b' 2 m m�m Cf/l 3 £gym O Wsmm a ,c = o C m Tm mra 3 n� w« m c a y� g.5a G LD o A C j m 2°8U� = M m m «ca O}g G mn w W gg.o E'w o T gEq$a�nn U U m N 2 a m J O M C m E s U m 2 26 �32 $mcamm�'ca >mvz Lm.. aU MEm o E E3 mrnn UWc0_ c EmcU €g8NaS. �i $ °gg a, -X514 cs� °cg =EErrS w as,- OEC) mom9. m2 mmm gu' g M c« 23r am m oo8m&°° c. -'_'$ �cmmv��Pt2�c�mc g E i _ C m L0 32 m 0 0 0» s L m P C m 2 L H T ' Em c - �E as a..mm -0 wopn -U o 3: as 8Mam ampado- :226omy$ oU @y UE 2`3 ya,ca E._cg2m8cS$�= Rmcmg��t .cc U'ma�Eg� me a,�m ci°cmm S... ma553 wo 00 mro3o.0 x�mu �-cp ..Ero �'°ccz�c�cm c�a5 gXm$ mq?= 0 -$cN mcc o 4-m c g$o3 ama mmLm.. d= c €H m i- Go o£Wm o= m a m M) D0 i9�1 S� 2m�o „N � m S g m m o° gr m�E a som"=3:0 m m U _ � m C > L m o g m m= b E cm E o w Frn0 `° m m ° m C a E m g o �~ �p vmcCII U� �Ccg.gc m mm$ `a � E;m= °-a� o p `o E mM= sm Oo gcgLW ELoc W8t' ° a m5mE_ = ;ea r5 22cUmU M_ c8 mmam= 0 c c m m E� fiS$com mm2 ° -�cE F.415 Wtg =E c ao.SdE °m m= NU 4 N oa mUc L'o r,� mmN 3 Olm'pM TC$_t mm Ea��nO- ''S�g.mSi E my m m mS == Smmmmoo vo om m ° a =0 a°D em Wc� mr -m8c mE�'ocom 0 00 mz— `my ,L Sit m m yCC o m y`MM= W m�.$ym.c cd _.. om'At t m ZMEw3=mUnm «v 8c 0 10 °e -60 m� mm c n m E Rm �Y a5 3 +y w c � 0 0 !J D m° $ =o: -a.m0 S �mCo n= =mom a �o Q o m � c m ��c N N J O C m E z U m ¢ S m co C~ c o E L w m L � L_ a L� c 0 a :s 75 Y pC� c ecpp O n m O E O V m 0 tm=NimO a rJmm' cm 5-YJC mm «� � $ L r _°m L me . +`Em = O aM rm U L O H m oinm ar m•- m D wa Tmrmc me Sccqq° momma 2`om — °m`° v me o >>EEEm °�5 cm -$�i` °�L=m UaM 2Sm 3: TM `� pp��� E3 `°n �>.$ d�3 �Em gm E m c aoEmLmo L' $t9 5EtO �Saci9 mm� .m -Smr' 20 0 c 0zo: imt'o y.m acv ^� =E °c c4 �' E�Ea Sim -j- mcmv wm�r'�mv E mgm 3 mum ^_ -'_` EaM mmtp `c m .°mcmm —°9USm �"'u� .�ci m c d'3 Ems m5 H cvmrn3�c=00 cg °c aH= m d$d °cUc H£:° cc..'. o U m m0�'u °°'m ��� oom arm gvv $Ems cm" 'ccc m m .^.3m9.. m8w L3 aw o �+W Pj' Eornm c °mc ocm m U w= op c Q E 3 m O!= -E o m O m E 9 c U> °m m a'i�' cm m OW2,E cma5j a 5r .� cL $ ao UU�y Yc 3WS °mmmma55 HmE E m 0 6 0 a'�tim x vm_m°O'L_ "`— '0d'ma oym —Omva LL aV m mm$$ °m c'�mm $wpm m� . m m O L L V m 3 m 6 LL- L > L N m L i m E a m a ¢ E Q= m3 N N `Qwz= m2 m33 A'"'E d j3c �, u$m53 ?� „mo � a .d ac mm 3oL S c °m TC o Hm Eo -S fJ m 8 �� E$ OV K aami:6 ” a�m,ic �3v° H k °3 E¢ °mm � =3m � @��� Em y:O80 mW EQ,oco ELF Ewa¢ Ea Em,`m¢ cW:_�> mcTium ¢m Eo ct .:$cnamvni °c o W c oimm'W ECR EEnr oUQS y °� :E �a a$ om fC7 >C� V.Ra 0.5 U5m UmU Ua 88EV Um_�E> d8.3m Umcam Un N N J O C'1 C m E L U m Q > Vim ° m„ mo w w am �sa 0 $ mcty ccm $ >,om �o s 9 om $ m o 3 c a �Em m v Emm Et3 2 EEwwE °m-m m v m E m o E m Oa�2 o r m f T `p U n�mr,.,° ° �`YC mH$w� I�o °c� 3m' 9 m nm W m mGa c ocm.- �,�LD m.- mmm£ ^mEp _U E msm Eam.0 . $ m '0 �•3 r,Q w'gacW 0 E £ cp 3 NQ Ow 0 vC 80 s« ow a $ U AEc ms$mE 'Oc8 £H9o'm4f -q'm t t m w a-g3 c H p-m m>, .w 3 2� o c�E U ma Um EEm c = cm ow't m — m c ca o 3 mi3mp ft � m !aC m 9 � e me > m m ooe 6 u Z> 20co 0 a Ow 2a2 �w $ 0 $ 0 a 9 gd o mam -E e E Eo c , L m E -r m $ a m w m E LA r W F2u$ UOn m c HE3 O 2 �c.93am > 3 H Wo ocorn �c$omm >39 g S a c i''w mE s- W m g m q :r E HE m c 9 ` w m w E o E cm =m�m�ar o rm c mv o oz as °-m �$ WS m o 0hw mQ o , m m Oy A.z «��m m 8 ma z e � "E8 E E_a o_$y ay � aE m E m Elm >•° c.m > om E aa om v oim m 'm H o ot Em 02 w U$a 5a o 089 m 3 lS m m m Y S2� c a m •� ° c m E W c QE -° c j W U W � 0�g. r m $ N3l 2 E p m m0 Em m EE U r m S.scm. m n° m > E 22 � � U c a E n m R@ m m a 3aa5 .0 « Tmw U ca E U b N 4 U E 0 J O M C m E L U W GA r a m m m o T rn c m m W_ m 0 0 E a 3 m E rLi �U�mE$m rya c m,c c $�oWmmU V D w T° m yOmc�2 EQ� NC$ me =Ua�a °mmmmNc Oam$a o amwE mE a—g' �33q mt �MM 0) yb awUmEw2 Fi a $�mzE�3 --mmwo ZEEc YNcxm ch E m >0c ,°W m E ?wls `.,caSm m cm =mE ID 'mm.mc�aogm U m. N .e C m E �`m c N � L a a 2 E v >m c Ewo $ m ca W .c s m$ 3 ac 'g U 0`0 m2= 3 0 r E 3 p 5 >m m m ' ms> T amc m �c3 Y E c$Ti E Eco .Cc Ej m c SE3 3a m e~ e m 22 c cO�Ev a3 �am t�_tppm oa'�i EL Fn�EE N 02 c 9 s R m °a g c ro E m ? �w SEom 8 o E s E T-Z Ej m c i5.2-%82 d" Y 3a E 8 m.EEmm gy g m > m $ .% �C a Q o�mE a m 2 >$ C RAZZ �V nm$�L'c OE���.�E� U$ G ns a-WC 00G'w m m � x- cocmc>'mQ W m PatemM 733 =�YS E c c U rn 00 m$m- U a$V..mca � c$ a -c- ra m UJ Est 2� m E Oa m N U N m .mV y 0 2M5$ w co E ..2 E FA 0 c E �.S maN �mN m��EN'c2o m C m N a QmEOE?,E2 cm � � C t 3 0 ° DO -$ coo m •�t$ W e a a c m rn wmo _ C m W •° W U L t N Warm EL 3 mR�Q CU �TA W c m2$ N m C m rnoLrn imcm `oaEw �mEq 26842 w D m m J O M C m E U m Q •E ;s E1: mmc m�fig =_m ',rpi, vc °c g't �c°'p« _` .cffi c 0 m W w C L a N E 0 0$ Oj 0 b- a Q m` U R n C a c O 3 •O 0o'O .- mm �amcm rV m wVUE mma w m m •$ �m macu.32m o Emmc•c2a' g =mC32$rja w a —p�Uc oa am �ma�m$C Sm$m E:4 m=' m�v-mmm�$m m O1$m Eo a- 4) c_mm$' -'�� nm�+ _� w E mc� 23 O. = wv_marcmm.'i"om a$mi,� ° =n 16 5 a� 20 aOwm c ggs,N Qi -€mEvm E�=0 R.. c m -N�o av ffiz c" w m �i 3�.ffi cqq m-a •o$� c Otm.. a ^��.Fcr wS aU 8.c acic •$momm3'��eiw$ aw e M °m mmm -om� €c m- -° ernio$Eo0�E � m- U¢U rc m$0 ¢'m` = acp °Ee'c= �O m ;�gg`0c cc CD cw« «_ $ $ myomccmm mvc Eom•�$m$ Lcm'84 v � m•m � $ f ❑ a•E� >m ca m W 0 anR wt@O m0 = =0 mm - x U- $ W d C mmO� t Q � Q sm -$2-6 ow c m c Es c gym_ mEc Wmwg c mm �a� cw oc gag m E m" 3o-amZ a$ E 02 -e- m : 9> vo c« m o �oo� ° >OO? o m O$ 8as� � m CQ = yQ=EEOm Ow0 c mE 8, �0 L ='300 p 9 t o mL m C .m co=m A�mca.c mm�c m oe c0 a ErEE�m'3�m'd, �6 vmLroU�L� X42 Wmc O E ��0£ Emm UOQ EU$ °c 923o�c3iiq`o5 «�03 oc c�� ic4i U� icam Um W _ E ) \ \ \ \E \ }\ � - §. ! 'sue ai;, aUl k��� / ° %S *6E !« x■ 0$.0 \ ■Q ma \ kk |0 a - lu §§ M a;;� %� �� 7!§ 2E f§ .§ 22 |?!. §!® \ %06 )§ 2%!a ) E -_ §f® ` § 0 -i az�� ( %� { - \ a� a 7; ] ° | _ - )�f/ \,;{ §0 - ! = § t!■- �k(�) \ / �� /\ /\ } _ ,/ ` §] «,Z; S . § § . - . ]§ ] ( °� L A § /i _ NNN N O N � m m� - E c 0- n @ v 0 5 3 ME N m L U w "O ° O '� O) O) L J M N 0' C ._ [` Y N O c@ d L N N •- C C @S awcCC N-°i NO N@ _ @NC N mC w N(D @= N ~UY d o`o @a@1L 0tza 3NEN co�E@ '� _0-Ccn -i �TOM°- 0'a" c-aw° W�L aO @T �(�Wd VONa aw VOO -`L Ca (D @ W S Z N U @ °� G U O@ @ N N W U O f0 N N 3 T.= @ (6 C .0 C mN°�cOO C7 SELC"Cay__ �3NaCi �O`- N �.'L"UL OEM mawo . y= L 'U '00 ? W w O w N C O w C C U L ° U G O O 9 'O 3 =O 3 N N a p °" C L L = L_ @ O=_, o N E S 0 E '= a U N 'O C >. N@ O` O- pt 0 0 0 N N H L C° C N 0 3 0 C �� M@ LL C O' U N c a E 3 N@ c@� o o- � L N o@ ED- N@ >' ¢ E N N C 01 'C T0 @ @ a .L.. d@ °> y a N ... @ '� d UI @ E u�� QE _ o@ E-°0 CQ o E �.>L(VLt..L 41 roCC�Emo °� ETO °� m3 >" °a Wa c°iU.cL o m°aCi :3m� C7 0 N = � =� n ~@ .. °y- -? @ @S Uw.cNC -o@�O>`E'3a�i� @y @nn c N O W °� N L U . N C O" m, >. w w 3 L '� "° 0 7 'y C aOpcEp_@ 0 3W >.o �i w'§ ...o auo °Na'� -N' cTi@ a"i @ Ea =� N O-om 0 c 0NcO2 @C° >aE @c -c mNm� >c CEC >w0,wN rn���aO @@ ao�,,.d @ °oNO0w >�m �v'-EL- MO mm d :a aL 0@ m O'- o C7 L a L@ y w- a 1L- U O� O' m aEi °' " o _"o a U N .N C@ C a a 0~ -O d U@ C N Ta S ry j C@ D -O O C N y pt N l0 O .., a o C O N -O w­, C O C O C' O O. U N@ C U (n .c @@ >.-O S O a S 0 o) @@ C S C @ @ = O �N U (°J @ -° @ 3 Oa @ 3 -O @. j 0 N @ N > O- @ Y N 'C @ N @ 0 N N U C t0ac@ ,a@ °aa� @o -0 @ @oC .c :2=M �0 -_0 �-O - @Ot 0. @ @way 0- m M� 'r)M0 wo_o macm� L'o _C' -`o a�i�3N @. @ awiw"c 00, E0m > °�3aE an°�icmE ��o 0 @Eu°' U•'3C12 ALE =E . mo - _COC� d � o @ m@aO� � �=LOy E�@2E O ° ° o�a F�U-O° 'Oa a@ - ? a @ c O c 2 Oa @ a O) p C U m@ E @ j @ @@ O N, y N �E - T OE E� U E 2 U 4G -o am : E _Cop ° v a _C �` cE U QUcvw �-@ ?W m �5 °v °H °c m v w � 0 m o M E @ UU) N h w W W W z O= a u �, m o � a mn o C ¢ Em � 3_Ew d °o ,°o °� E: o"O''6 A5s0m's` zxep 0;: op 3- di a2 � ,C22� CCmm J .0 C O n of i. ,° � is �'pOp u � d� 0 � '• vOi —r.. m-1 ° 4 E N � z 0 0 g 0.' T•° 3 x ,�• 6 � E U v s'o U° o 0 0�� U� m'� p �a m aY Ei a o❑ o o$xxep 09 m.-, ��YUSc .S .c v`+ °m.mE °- C_$mSx° oU q.WU a�E pa ^ Q= EZ �6ce Ea m ¢°c'�•Pag�ao$ �5= �mv90 °a- .�o^C' q U 11`B 1- rso ° �v Eons ei'r3 ,5a3m O ... cES X33 ratoQ'".c� g5°vr9�x�m���' oz- x l! gg> �pp Q'OO U$'US'bi �d $bLC�E °m ho'4 B. a0i p v c.v y o�'�mOW O.m ''• °oo. a,$'c^a4i c.m EE'o$ f C ' o iWa�Uq mr� ma y.°. °?°e�•e s� oa=Qg a U�p �oyw'r �' map. �a y�i,vcaQ�.3 i ^$�e�°c UCH °C °e Vn' .� YEE1 !. j O N O 0 V m ^J °° x •" ',°'° `i O G �j m m E�Va`4 E x ° =�.°Ee ee�4e4S'�am L:ii �nC i �yU dr' o0 30 U o .°Z, y .7 $E a0(5 v3 _ o° �i g�W'� a •..m"m °m$d rd�t< a _m �E `C7a0.Q eU.m�U�Ff3 .��0 t, �°o racn a��d ,e8 °u �• `p'"`'op� K° x0 0.2 �a gZ-2 -0°8 �Q :a-E-xno�.£..aS � v^ ° 'a �d Eaa Ui �3•�-` oeS ES a8 V Qoi•o 0 10°U c 0 0 Ei 3 J _ a a N M d' 1p W W W W W N N m mZ O L (D m m `O N n w c X d a) m> UJ C L N O O m m O m LL T O maxi N= mM � 0 m m m m-mo w o� m m 0 0 a� LL dap mwy-3 3= � o3T.a.3"om @xc3aLa o ._ c mmomUco�wQ'�c 3•_T Yam -u� �a< m o O mUx °-�- o m X- °xv_ m -° o o= �j m 0 (D ° =m °�N� mom °- °� �U��Oa� 3 =E "2c°�m:n"Z�°'t6c o� ID a) �w E E oa m E2 E M E ^ a L- 0-U;; c ot�i � c (c ca) D- 0 ��w p�-d cwm oo �a2 L"m w° c m ° r-Y� -mm m v E L w n:-'L Oca) . dcm" 'x al oam mn o m$�^mm °rnmm m9 m�n m d'U � ' o m ) iMrmya0 w ° � m �cO °cy° a�m °-'Da) OLm m�mm o mm E r c " y y w �c o mmm Nm E a, a0 m Q � E °u ( � m a) a)D o 08- E m.a - mmo va ma .2 M cNm J ��Q°E om 0= 0 c o Co CD 0 Eo W-0 mgc U �" Q �2 i T�OX o Ec c 3 a) o Q c > °L U S o m mud U) > m m m ^ N � o E Q Q LL c a 0- ?o -�� o °y0U o��S > m� @mU mw o acoE �U m :cai aim > a O � i� c ° m Emm W m -o apow uUo) �omo"mOo ai . 'Q m Co o a � m n o m"` o g _ no a am y c y o = � m ai Y o o m o L m = o h m c O c - E Q a w 3 - a ac : = Z m L O- y c [a p O= N O� m e aC (n O Q W om n � 0 (D U`m'ai j ai °ow Ex mm` -°mUmc a��amso�o� a�cw rn�oZ omu,oa:° -LLc +'mUrmo m wEcmoL0mmt- -L w onm ��oa � N OO d_.�`>. o�c2vmc =.c ro3 m=m a�caci -a cU 3 ° 4m w ' o0mc-m o 07yMi Emy ai�ao�m � Om° m m ar E p uN O 0 c m O 3 n O a) F 0 ° m ZQ n LL m W- 0 UO m W W W � = 0 ° v.S o:^ Eqo 3� $E c E'��._a °.a". �JO o U.Z`�ii mUE $E w °mUx,px•� �c m a °.. c.E d °-$Stilt c �i EUc..T.._... m.+m o'3a �Em� Em sU=oo�°yy °°.° yam ° -8 �j�enw<=R -S-o is -e E' a .'�` & E ° .e a m o d m rs w 8 ¢'-� q •� Ei mi =_�w �•aoF�Q.�� v Boo - #J. aU, -�.B,Q v°W a�, 9 gS 42 .�. >°m�'o -U� °O� W 05 °S'"'r ovu m.Q o>�zO ».��q�`: `�8m _z9m q wco rod 94' :9 o 9 . � q °m o mo a w vEw(�EJ pm O a oTE3;zA e"? 0 i d _ Hm I C 0 0 � • w ° S m c y _o y o c a, m p 8 y C O 2 5> M _ a2 U N ->a ❑ u s. U O o a$ E$ �� °•9 wv E °ei�8 m aE u U C �w�„� Cx w a c`,� G$o �`�c•$oeomQ'id 3 y i AM•a S: &�,ocop•oq m� >A U E. j o .am. °+E�'•v x�°a °'om>, .. '9 °p.�..E v ^o Co �e c mo, o.°d IUuq'vmW._� nL'► W rn s. c a >a c= C a) y a) C O O N> O aypU °m� ' a ° c°E> L .� ".a) . -(O 6 'O `' a) - p ° .. j 3C = nF.• w� O n NU O O mO C U _ .ca °- =N °@ a L.c y.. � V pO� ~ O TZ TN ,-E -a CO x @ a) (D al mo= ° cN a E< U MEE° Uaao. �w $ -0 0. - :E t: O °nmC 2)0-m n� 'a E U c— O- o m L N O 0 L O = ma W N U) momM"mnd.p O U = mUU y i d U a y p a o o 5 0 aI nli "U m00 — mU c -oa _ a) Em° m oo a)- ca ° .—= L (7t 0- 53 oO n"H (,m m m aO D Mc o m ° °d d 0 ° p p� w °0° C) ( ~- CD U 0@d 0�3 W°CO°° `w.E 0n0 �0 0 m:- °jUal�N' -'o ac�n w -Z =may 0)to °0wdE0 a — m° m �aCj Loa nm' => Q 3-ci ! °o E a . �LEo ° ��.SE� 01 LO =a � aOa >M a aJ w p ° L� c a 0 M a) M °� - E —<D 3 c Z n 0 0 a m U) n m a`l a� U o� �� E o> -� � o a° 0 m m-m E m 0 —.-.aa n _.. N N_ y a O - <n 0 N O D_ Q- N M M 0 >` N O U W =£ C ..L.. Y U y ° C` a N 3 O N Oft ycncpL@� ra U3o _ `0@o.`mo-w —a-°° Q L°.o�.c��$��� °� -3 aw 00_ Er �Ua mw �doallo c .�.- ° Z T- 2 rn to - N L m ;.- c m te fy N N C N cc p N C N W = c N N O N O N U E G L L N _aN U 0 a) p E c N w r N 0- - E °— O m > W N - nun > W a °UC r 0 0 2 d a s E c E O� 0 d o a� v E $ C9 M o a a(7 o > ) p - E i o ° °m v 2 f 0 0 : � aa c _ O Lp m � U m U ° O C O O O N N ?� E U% (D L N N d N C E3 n'. 3 0 O U cn_ °> o O N On@ p mw > il CD O)D) foE QU � E °o! 5 E-9 S_U n3 co 0 E.c °-pa -� a�= E fa m °� �a 3 a� CU M � =Urno� w°'omEt3�f6 TM=�a.Lp.2�? Uo-p3m °iayZ co 0 L N N ` ° .. E p O I- O O N N N UJ a) W O L d O .T. n N L ] N F-� a m� dQ 3 Eri2: 2: 3 r m c W 5•_°�_� -Q °d.qo 3 0� m w co N o y �ao�mM 8,So m c 8 'Sb `aS a 3�ob, .g$ o v >' ° x 3 Cm�+ w � a = w Q � a o > S: � ao� $i o �,., 'D V •� � " O d 3 Q W m (,y m D m a.S a o '$ ro a E °' W' •° m m' °.-��y- �] ° .5a op -�� o'mo$ g0 >,3 C rmo'8 vS3��a 6�C� 9 o!q2=5 �,A, O E c° 8 c= F Q g u o ww oQya '� 'a,Qw 5 $3��'°wU-�i'm' avFi0. .9 m- o woa ° �o¢l�p, -"T.m 8 a m A m �dm�c8C �amoaQi� am$Wxvm�m p�'"jo m�m'��a m� 0.i 4 A 0 yN �mCm O Q L sm.�yN�� Pr ��.q i�oObm C �'amr'J 0 3 0$ W -5c 8 c an�ss <2i e� 5¢ o= ^� >§ Q.1 o w - y m . L V -so m m o{m: $e��`d U� ".Z g'� _$ .,s,� - b m°�e k, ' >.v oQ� e� oe . m cola Q0 m'm�m-$mm -q aS m U s. �W��v� PN ox o��. .pFC.DOmm �c .=o. •°oc m e > -o a�:.W v°: $,G i E mH q' �o, m Q .Q ... Lb C w° w w w w LL] CO - N x O L V r0o E aoi-�i2 " E 3 o m U) 0 am a- ML W 0 2 - ad me ym 0 m d c EUU nc 0L c NG >� E.2 o m O N 00 N .�-O ��; aE� 3a oLmaU)mcoo0,mE 0n-W0 )asEvE >o - -O ,- w o m y E m L c 2 0 -_ C L 0 r0 00 o'0 LLmErcmmmE U O U m ccao�„, cva Zm�E� ° m m E° m Q m C O C- m j C O m 0 N 0 y 0 3 m O L C- U .o LEU) nr v o cnmma y me) 0 2 E- d 0 C C d m E m - U C 0 m 0 CO N m e -y0 O °Nm+L'+L -� C 3-00 C m U m m 0v aciriri `m i. 00 EL m m ao 0 ui O C O L O 0 O O y D X 3 0 �- L O N 0 E y �p O U CL p U O 0 I m L O .- 0 m o E EctnEIma'E�--cmy2:U? -0 m° 0 m C.- °ccy-o��a>j"cuyi ow 75 0 E 0 0 :° Q m- c m O O d C [L 'Op p w C -O U° L wU n 0 o ma mU 0= L 0 m o C y._ovmOVi -Ec�m a- °iowm6C � 0 = Q'1 c ow m a o N N -C-O 075 ° y n. EL `o E -O N m 0 m y d w C° 'U CQ E U T 0 0 d C'6- m C 0 m .0 7"(J N O 0.C'O .O 0 m nQammm"m>ES y C C m O.2 L O !I c c m L 0 O C U °u0? i L �C > O U P Q O O , y o 4) 00 O Q U>O C 00 O m U � U=- N 0 ' C O y y .X 0 O co C n 0 N H 0 0 o 0-.0 '-' m m 0 ... -O yw .52:E c°1�nn�?Oc L 0 L o._ 0 y n o nm F- ° m !? 3 o E- m m y 9 ma c. c m m UJ 0 y L 0 L C 0 3 m C E L '- 0 w TU O C O 3v �cin ° o m �Q mm EL-Q a3i w.��v�U om'Ew >'3r- - -LU a U 0 3 U 0 C N L 0 3 L ° c 2 m y m m m'3 m E$ N L 0 D. c E rn N 'L' N O. °- m 0 m° 0 N d rnmo- nL�c�.nco 0-n awy3c3 °dC0° -d @ E o O ) �w me X O. � ° E m m o o m N m �� 3.nc o E 41 N 0-O"L mm O-- � C F- m Q. Z T O 0 0 0 0 E s 0 w 2 c u E m Y _ T m- m° c 0 on- gym °mm� co 0 .Q>Q E� �� a 0 m 0U "L' d d p m C C U O Lrn 0 xNBo, 'g > mU °fi A'S -dc ao Ec,SE x,°�a 8o m °•Om�UU m-c°e •�"c.d'g -$90 - .'�aao�-��mmora�o- a,$ Sod 8f 9.ta °,°'�° �❑ � ._ja. mUU�U °•Om ors 4 Q�V o�oa .Sv 4u Ta v� �m muAU m �4m EN'S 9 W%y °E �i0 mo L)y0 ova >o aE � o od vu`O > o .� r o $� ��Tfi5 v°W p"acE °oa.��aa ° ��vUo-- o,, 8�g�wm o ❑ p, Si o � a � fa av �` £ ao rd' ££ $ m i ❑ E g m'aa O1 o o n' .°.• � m.g m p O S �'a •� N ° � o C7 : .° M .. � ° pp ' %"�'> m �j P: 5 8 S 4 W a° fit] �a ^eo J �' KZ 8H 'n^. a W c oW o � o Wen a, .. fi o fig �' c4 0 o W o fim 9. > q a°f � o � m E °� o� a a o•o � . °m a -fi 8 �,�� o m o o Q� o S.°.v t: g� a 03'aE v.•,°�„v�ogg�e Q S .m.�a`.:.� aOVOa°�y �j°�60 0 ."°.'� vU �' $ m v?i , .voo�$av'a>3 . vo� p � U gmE3 .� a� �E• s�c SS''fi o`� O >:° o>� �S-• c � n •=.° vE a 4 I Q. a c> -f! � fioeo ' U o f ° 9Tgg R v QOeg e r°og8 b 2.5 °c=Ca� woov m � '- ° 3 U o m S3 -'a c� fiQ a gi'• ^o ^�+'xm °o'ai a. e.?: 9 g�i' ;, o... .: W ou�o'mao�m o 00 a.o I ml wq .: •^-t Iw a.W�a�w°� lU oda'd.� w w - W E C an d d m N J N ,O N m U m� N° U N c N Cl) N N r c o- -m U d c° m m m a N - E m m m- o 0- - w< m m H N° N U N= a m LL m O Z D. Y° C U N N L N N C C N a W -NO ~ E N N N o cU -- E >�o >��m�om� -a �� °mA- 0 - >NCiE-o` -°mn uNiULL >m M C m 0-6w w m -O >.– m U C is m 3 Ui m of m C m C– U U) N - °�oca>imE�O'@�UNm> '-�NOm��on Nw�'v�omcmU .°E�mN a m o r N N o 0 N) H E N c y U t c c m o o m o m N v o'a U m o � 0 ui ;'oc�0 m3 QNm "� �3°m°oy0 � c 0- 3- o 0 0-2 ' m C ° U3 L a m m LO@ E Z) U w– w C m – Ua NZE�@.0 E3mUmmW no °°m' > m 0 � !6°o� vcNN�d >� m"� � cE LI) W a 3M ZDM °� °6L~ -o ?m C ° oo Z' O a) c E E a�m a° a w NMU w m >` M 0 a C U m C O m O p� o N O N Q W N d w E Z O— U m W Y L U m t6 C1a M J m T O �UL NNmi Nvai .�. -n_sU m- ��•ranNOiocw om�UOn =Qm mmo o'o fA aUi - W-WE ) oUCN °maNiN� °EOaUi >`cLm. °y -OO amimmc ao LL L-C O� O 11 -O a- C m l0 �-j := vi ._ m -O N N O) O N m n m m Uo"- Uao wwc> -o-c n. °NON -o m- �M -woQ >wNcE =i-o 0� °�_W .� O o a E ja �� 5 ()UFLN -.L..y OI ID ^rN °C C0 NN. - N°N Lo .00:ENm Nw���c N °'�°'`°� c=n'0 ° .mowo wm- .NOCOW'- cD1 �mm31L -L' E�NN.°NCU m.c Nw °0 a) C) .ca oimymO -'°ow mom?°' ci EWmrri3 v N N o o m m =_ Eo- m�." w N= c N 3 o c E-o ' -- c m x -o ° C7 o m ami�oi j 0,m30 ==Uo ai'wc���oo n- wNaNmo N•Lm -000� mnN =mom N 3��om c�62 Cm U >= ?`ma�rNnN> NU am- m- mN°-oE a0-omg aL„ ° a m �.' -'.. O+- N N Q' ° a NM:= m C Q a � 1� c E ooQ 0, aNi a � � �� m 3 mom= y -vim S� mU -° w•�� a°i °- tw aNi w Umcm._ 6E NN2 a4i amm0m0)E -old N >' >...oU)E ri ..N. m o- y U d -O CO C '..N --. N trail a U E c N tangy N m .LN. O` ` m an a is `2'gEci,3a°fim3m��0 uyo�mw� @�N c�iU��dw�.MD @rnymC�1LL a'�O.LLpj Cm N cl) "O NNNNNENNN NNULU N - =DU�b am NOUN °) a 0 m O 0 U C m O O N tNn 0° O C a1 ° N ' m 3 (n M N m o (n m s m U m m 0 ii mU) a<._ U m o >o6._UU Q m o E U ° aUm `o. Q o- a0 and o rn o w w w 8 w -o 58 �nw� 'so-so rte. o° �.5ta oY 'a v-°o so0.'d py en Q md'� md5 �,° me U.°�a g V,JN y; iU w�Up�.o° m3Q e t C 0 tJm _gym o�7 c mipc.°cv 'gym•$S' a ..;°. °•` -''� ' `v' 00 0 °T Oaimw boa oQ$. -. �km »� F� E °>�•°e �U °•a °pm °° as R -fir �, U� �> 8U 80 Q o• v5�e 3y Qox mm o•°oNrd �' -moo n.om'o d� 3 o,0 0,.m m� v3a. QU `-.9 ao 0. 5m � m �.sAl v °tic .mwm5v� t�Ji m•i�. S'm- �'' `omm 3� � � IF $ 5 ij ; m i 8 .->. °w o 7g g 3 U o 5'o A C'og N 8 wUP Q>'�.mlm .^�'$bF°m > •Sa2 nc " =.rac "��nd i 'n°J,nUO m, a � o m . o°N`°i"�o� m z°m vm °:cd i - r� mai , y o '^_ .9 uE .�nd mm v 0.1QQ a d v� o° ° N U eo ' a :� mov i 7U-'4 tj 33 .0 m av o E w o -32 U ' �Ca > ^q , See°.Q c= o yy U u yvss icy cNcm.Pi'�¢¢am�; ,,Vcc a,�tgg° Q�m^'Zc rsw o'T8� -°' �• ° °c`° aeocc°. mN mT�'3ar�� Y'�O,a U$ ry 'L' .S `�o �,° rn.n •5 ... _ ow �m FmU �vls FmS � C.�ge... Cis o� n �v� Sao o. • • • • • m C) N C7 V l0 aJ iL w w w w w w w Y °oa`°i @m� °o �L 0 m m� m M 3 ° m "mL ai. mm , �a m M N N �7 C7 N � � N m m m w aUIn :Na . am m m� -O- am w .,c m mM 0Mmm S a o A ta L� M M„� o M 0 M Um c U >aOrr >m�a 0= p M N a N E rS a o 0 FcT 0- o O0 3 o w M. h Q o>u` � m> , -a'�= L m —= -- �a)U) E 0 �' �X m ° c amoo a M. - omo m 00Um 02 O m M �a .-..6 °m > E om°n mm� o c >u. aa aw ac4- tl U r a) n0 nm° 0 mm nQ No m (E C M _. aw N0 E -d >0 , M � o -2no 0M o=°=E Q > ° m p ai Q otq - r a wmm ':o�7d °m Mpa�w w mmm=1ND o ao a) 0 � L L N �a L @ N y Oa M 3 L+m-' Ua O ° N N Z) Z) w m c N -0 N° ELD ° U) m > E c _ C N C s.� i °L w a m a C N Cc w m a m 0 i1 d $�°3 ` 0 Y=O vms t O M CL �W oO a> m d O 0 L m " m o aD N y m GZ 0 2o w M o ° M E 3 m �7 E m �_�= En: g m c = oa� ot� m�m ° o a� .m m:M�U N N E Ul a=m E E.0 am x u) O S m O N N a C .0 0 0 J C O m am- C 0 0 m m O w E m (n � a mwE �=E Qa N Cm a <Oa y 0 `E3mE mL M M ON aZ m, rn i Om ~ .0 M a ow m 0 it ° N N E E. pmLm U NaN c ,m - E a _° m ° a � M cam ? a U a ,M - o � a o .2 EaO a -6 x: U .> Uaa M — E :Ei OL � a'�U M c°iU Qm_ m ..m ¢> xai n 20 m �aL � aK m W v LLJ w w W w a: �ar�°.- -sa ?'S �o iG5 A4� m 0 p a °.� 30 °�0�m�o mEd '$Q g� ratio yv }mac 0. 4� m F- m 5i m we p mp 3> caa ado �U .°�� app $d i°. W u%Ia Zy .°. oxLmm �s a � N m =y`d� m a °�a pu'g m °.`� _ oe�4 '� to oo�Up, G;o°^, 1 ox a ° 0 la g$Hv°i�o 'ea. °M do,$'g s ° m eq o° Pro� u�Q w a ee gts a > oU a m O o w> m ^�++M mwF °2 .c .O mw �yU W�U U� =Y vo-g�a meanb9, 0p ti7 qe`b Big x °001 'sa.at' $=> IR eci� a. �'O� dV�y d mm �3 a�OO ��j! y�� m O!'a��•��� 3 m V AS m 0 9uJ� O O N M V 4O c0 w° W W W W- W W W �y aya ° ID- o MM-b - mo W o a Q m m m m o O° N E ° � o U a m o o w w w c U LL m aai co lWi c o o a=i -°°a Onr > =ate m a) a@ .Ow �c n O °, W— 0) - O C a) m w L C o °UUZ3�4 >:E0.— o C N C Q N C C O. U E V a) d o a m m N 3 W T a E L o c m'- Eo�OU>.acaoc --mmE N=- ,w0 a1 °- O c m N w o m E U m m EEO O O >i U O O m O =Z m 0 ID m m n''O O N o U rO m a1 a N 3 �a E m;.. c na N MX o(o m a)m -o' NN CmN F - > @ mm— a)�JCO ° n 'Q m oi'io EM ° w Un �N 0 m E c a c `a 0 mw –=o v a-o 1.2 E �m m� ,M Ow mo yZ > -- 2l m m N Co o ° c °� ^U •_ ° EU c o wH a) (D 0 Ea °'a�Q' U` o<- ° U E U a Q 3 m m O U w LCo oU.O-. W Ow C 2.s U ° o m oUQ 0� c W 0 0 E O A U � o m N a w p o y C o •.O. -gip =`sue � V '3,cd6y II +b vsar CTS � U y C �taG0n�gM §. E � ~ tt 41% it A, ° e U c 8 W e. e C4 E E V a C7 m o arc � L m a) NO ( E C C N O- C a E o 'g a °UU OU) ° C m N O L E O O N E a C a U @U c X x m w ° N o mo @ m O N N � N m N m v y �_ N N aU N= O L Uo r�ii0 m - - -m 0 009^p�o Ema •o �,o P El m 3i a� ^m roa 00 4 p� m° y u�� S Q •Y � p o > c =� 0 E -6Z ° S m � .� �i • m o p0. m'l5� oo 0° u.y° .o�C�a� m m agrs° m` axe DT�a Bpd 'O w °u$°'v� m•oJ Ica Cis °��d R @ €E 3a °4. Z� r g D v° E R'bo v Rj 24 U .N. v W W m'.a vym+n•cw m � R u Smg9C��•.. dV M = Em gE;c m `dw °Wmo F5 ° v ^mT '� fi•� o aFi c�'o�•�m dt m u EE U m�v° mom' �x�Ew�s�°E8 o R 0 q'2 mL 0 8 F S S B �a�L�7ON — o mE oy = .EdsoF$ .R. T t `a p -C—• L g ❑ a o m o'3 8 Tw U m a9 c m W a r m -O°- •� V o N g d CC O° 0 m o 0 m m Q o o mw•� V 0 a m W > o > > o a 0 0 m m m W y W W N N N N N N N N C C C C d Q Q d N N N N O O O O N N N N N N N N p0 O O W W. Ll W - - - C p o oo �_Q a.°o a�f c �-.°, o y a y �_" c d .n 9.«°m ..m w,�° 'y^'v oL p7� cE >�� °' E .mm. .9 �'y «d36- "�;�i`G� •? a? a'-au eo �' ° - ^° 0 2 O E A m Rv m L y q9p .S a. '.�° •O C C �J -O 79 "� e c $ $ 5 >m"ep m53 vW oa 9m_.i�6mm,o. 'a�:'�.m a - �� E � maQL 3� °x.c°.. - cW °c. °�F E•a q0 m - y .� v c m m" g . m � wm aL - m S &y O g aQ . _ -$"G �•op q¢-�w�5mg �°�' �c��oo N 'fix -Yp} m�� -�'�ms °m' �9�� p O N� � at u L m Z-0 V L y •i m T ... a' m T Lap •' rJ' O ro 9 C m� g y m 'moo °a .S wd .5,9m Qroo3 a«°i ov $ W3 �^ m �•8 oa?�5i mo-g P Svcc '° NO L° � 'm.m 9 ° `c , ^s ° m ,,4 0 9-8 A El a Ana y ae ,.s, •'� ... 0' 9 m' m Lo .m. o Jv '� C..S''� No C 0. -� W v aci p' •� p c e W a > - o :7maw$ F>°. .o "$�� 3 oa. w-> 8 pp m 3? ^�+u[7um J vey. �a m Q� Na5 L°mg�°&'e?: G ° omW m•Oa T"am bA�.�a. cqx ae�O ksy .C7 Q -o� c d=o a X03`3 '� qq ,°ewp pi G m � W m.0 O L U ea 3 3«°, v om T9d U'�c. rsmo� °xL' �Lg a. w00 �.q •� ��oo ap ap ''Wppppyam ot�o'g - 0 cN. .°, .3 g_ Ch _ �°' .rs $ ^.E'c� m �u•g 9a ^m ,'...cQm .',� may mW LxxLd UcI•� «� .n� .o � ^m$ °9 m�L ogm m•� S Emp3°' rib Sa 4., 39's,E, •O o �• mom�'c �3oPm --3k�i mL mm�i oo" pri.8 Wm- P.'Uvoh � II II 11 Il � W O N � N N N W W W W W r w N N C C a U w @ N N@ N@ - N@ '� .-. N C E a� U -X � a 0 C a O L O U Wa. °NON NO+- a @ °m�Nm�N E'o c N U c a ° m s N a m¢ a N C N a w 00 > of , a -o o @ N U) N .a U E d C d N c CO a M �O O O N 4 m m � N a ��N O >C �ca 0 0 N O a o C N U U° N m a NUQ oT` c (O � U -U O. c a N-` U W .(D a- (DW E N d 0 a N E c@ U G c— -ca N N N > j C N@ O c U) N N 0 3 Y U o� m Ya nsm. = 0 N ° o a @ N p T > = G 2? N+O N � c a 0 o �,a Y ?m 0 m ° o° L L l6 U O L m N a. N ° a N O R' O' V U m N .'L.. O N O j N W O aOL �-° Q a¢0a NzF - =mm N C] N N W W � G u.°c p.wa� .�v° '�' o pq a'ro ..00axs°c' mod ffiq E�Em$ �� s cod avam�OGda� oEo occ u�s�'$ ma mmGO o n, oG " .> c d •„, .m a�.8 . m ld' -9 .q -i O � o cS.m « ,mp v -«°t�S o w 6 A , . C ° . a 3 a "�•' v o"c S o a -o p�U � = a oGO�Y y ii -mm . o�•E°C A pm. 0ok^� tm p ,m u F°oi 4 . °v m O o mo u -0 vS a o °°d -0000 IQ _w S 3 8 mcc y a - aN e�wm��° C�'�m l;b0 mE $'do p° 6 o m axi 83 0 o E. o U 2 l o v G o ��g S m Q o'�'$ -03= ..: m g 0 9$ o C x "a .,ir. OA M �'vl a o o •� c L' m �'wo _� u m.E q o oa �O� C.m vim o � m . aG •mo�o'Spa A�^� 3�..�2°aSom a��u11$� .°-. m> .0 O P°. $ m M E C [Op C a p O 0 o F G] ,so 'Saa 3.°��ppssNm0 o°. �. ^� m^ 0�o.... or�o °>ocV oW3 °F mQ o a zw -o�� Vim... p -2 >�m „"mpg "z x'aQi� ''u_'""_5 C7Cp Bm2 m€A;$�x �c �v•p"�$ °.UUin 3 E g$>°�c°v�^'a moy�n, o°� po °?,Q °�« �E0is gym° S cma "oC7 '"w"p 4 �'•O_m tea' a�1�- pv�,�ma c m e + m °. $ m °o t m.cUdS�q C� a o 5« aam... g �� sa a. 'X s pp u $- w�°• � �s o�6�� G O M R a d G w C w A G a O> m m y 9 �✓ FTmp ..V 6S WW.N w nvm SEE.T.m dlj . m_ c o...�m IM m 8 3C7 A $w Era $FCS apG "L'...,ox W N p N W Lh 0 a w _ m Lb 0 a s o E E 0 0 � U v an W W c•° ye g' a a &� ��_•o .99�c -.gym 6 r5 3�va ta v•i°° o �$_ a;�m. SQ�N� Am9o�°C ,mm°:3 �gg0 0 .�G-og' 83d"'y S� 3�So�mp,3 m�., ••, ..oa .S &❑ od as >. °x''°�oHf{�cW�Oq 0.�� xs'4e�-+d�Sc 2- 8 �� o�."..'°'��8.cm•" �'oU o�S 5p�,�, ��`Q ,,�°5r,�. ur ..F =� a nN2cv va'',C{mcG '�C`3'S ^"�" S.°yq arc 6.19 ki emm e9 r1a` v 9 aS eon .O :) ya SeD ^^C m q . p 0w° 79 4g y b 6x= m:�Sa48a� a°. o E oav U x.bl yo .�4 �No a $ � 4 o :i q o 3 m o k ao.�..n � . > > �qq o �c•.i^ ew " o o5 S m 3 m c .0 o a x cd Sa > w m a'3 .wq o. $m.$S'OoaC�7yi_ q > oo S w i w3 tWc S >`•T>�.° c° � a°. a�ao o•r yJ. "a .u�.S .�aaS @ `d 8 W a wsi o, Wp$°. 3 0� a °S o �awo xxa$8fo C7 UA -'e .7Poq �m °og$ S sa'a.m o'a °E�•OS.d o,SmN °_� u •$ $ a ° €h� ?o9 d .m, -�.� m'@ ay.a 3 -Y m�Ce°•C $ O . . Z>°m Wv.c $ m y� AA A ° QG S ° -6 "8 c 'otl y' w r m a O Lo o N W � W W' Y = o m c o U) -moo m aNi °c Q a >u a 6 > — o U — c t o o E m om 0 oa3i a�+y 0 c c = w w c OO 76 N 3 Z) � rnU0) a m a) 0 Z 0w c a to a Oa_ — C � O O T N o 0 > ..t. U N L L p a O a N O a W N > Q- 0 a O N M d N = = N p O W N N a ¢-0 L 0 C W n M y U N N O o D M o N y L m CO m a a m oa o aw 3 N t0 = N N U N = CN d R) O L m � a �w a-0 -o a a Mw = w U W O O - 04 ro N N N N. W - W W _ Lb - m o m fig tb ��m q.. rV�4y4tii d ��LL"i o SC o d 2 a ° 4 mao u �$oy�. °eS r Yc �. a 0. o Uj C 4 �. B x .off ie .,rg v S '2 Uo`y Ca. `� S." i'i v Sti °. Fi m 2� vm+tyylo ii oo -2n' u mPo a o Br .EN c w o w m W 0 N co 0) O N C? W W W w T f0 N U N N N N N L O N O O C N= 6 C C L l0 L c NUN 0'. m(0 .3 p-N N N N yaO LL ad d� U U w OU N=Y ID c E c 'v- U) 0- 0 00 '3 J N� N c� p1 C N 0 C c -C N -..L. c N- . fO N N CO p— O d ,U N N m 0 (0 N� a = p 4„1 0 N > O c N C m d C N U .O N N T > U t0 U N N N 3 N O-Oc Nw O. NT. '0.. LLl ap@ NON O.� N N -Oa .Z` C p >� N 0 N N N r ❑. N L (0 N `1 U 4o U -O N O N 3 D .20— 2 (D— a N p a N 'O U T N N O.L p N Tr C U N ?. N O N m E 0 m o. c U c E m y li 0 CO w U N N -'_' c`-- m 0 m O N C =m-6 2wU 20 03 NNc Q Q N L Q-Oa V a V p Dl U y 'O 01 01-06 01 N a aDm a a l'p N N p a=N ,.. =_ m dWc M CS - M M - W W ee .W W W e - m a � Q . m C a,R'3 cce, egg y R 3 e to $74 4 r v Va 0 5 eou °poe ° 3 ° Se1 m 6 3QZ 6i U 45 C Psi C) d c N c] z s r a .y WS «„�°��o'h°'� s �E ?� nt �ti.zQ,s�•y°jo °'s�E.0 aVi -O (_Vq -O w u i o � C G h i m z s i •'' b o;i �> `�' O C R 'S" z H y '' t =o� =o� '^L .°, •�"'$im `� my mh �; °oizsen •., 5�'y C °'o °'o eaw�eo4 ='q� tt� dM my nv erne o4mzvr�� y m3 m3 sam «S °°'o 0o c3 z 5cie "u °Qw OJ c_ai m v m w �. 5' a C `h ti r o '� 4 4 5 •y y v o0 0 m vo '° y U"' '.. ° 'mm 3« Y> W;r« nbU•ti �;.- y a °L a°L 5;:mseoo�C�� im 5� e�h� a °no�uy�'se�nm z c o s `oW o NN NN rszti °_ate o 5m�is i>, W°y^,en•�°•;°i•iy'?wr�iiym p d' �Y` V C« C z .�. C d 5 N i d h ~° y d[ y •� V o rn� mm sCymySydi zetQtiyshyFy �LSy;oU' rd °4�WyTym mm may hx�5' °aa;••4`° eo Yye -•m'�e °i3oc'i 'c ht: CL CL d2' ti` -Lti�iW y$�r `�Ci o�.$�.v ��u�s�h Cwbi'CQwo 'qv qy�,v vp 4z@ tl a , v y v de b O O w y. y m S epd .3 Y,�l` u ; it yO uEz -••U d?;-a o� s U n A �c' �'•a� ya°u 135�+c� F�i p V e 5 3 i= 4 U F a 'z b y ti a •p y a; C � � W til v '0O nfti O S yS � O C aK ��r; m� �. iq +� g��O •n q, y U q y3 0 0.0 V a 3 S� d 4 'D? Ug �.S.6 Cg �O w°.064 UUF x° L —J I ii U N cp M M W W @s �o � t @m U N En Q E N > C t0 @ Z C a O � a s N U � c C @ @ @ 0 Y O co O @ yo m � c _ O U O. C N '- U1 @ � m O J C C C N N E E E E 0Uro LL a 4 U O F F U �y W z� o � W m Y z 5 4 W O ry �pag N — a° a �H m o P' B vat M E�a i �ga �g n�yy�B�e W p T A� °3� U o y o 3 � � $ 13: H 5; w^� 9 AAii �a �4 tile e � a 25 yy'�a gs m � 8g w ayS'9es °e �L a 9 3� A G ga e9 �S M °a v T e as„ �d e ppp e^ ;0. n s e d yUv 3,l `` >8r �g} 3 Ale n 0 5 C] m M a a � m a TT j O n 0 5 C] m M a a LL R Do J O C N L U t6 1 Q ale I° ® r E u c 3T 9 °° v $ m $ y LL o 2 o °9 KZ c °cif �� mw m _tea- g �°�g$° mciaop to mmv� ~ gLLd u'i s`gB Sg x^o ling 9 i a C Q ° • 'm0 '�g{ O N ng C C 9 o s a o m o£ a $mac° 3 5 a a o 3 $ = na co° m 2 a 3aa°i :e 3t, u c T N c 9E rn� $ E o v E ff p° o b W J a •: c W m a °s oS3 B acE. r q O r C °nU3 u�t -`gym �=a8 T26m �9 °?d9 �'m 9ciu�n$3 rc�io °no 1' A m e E lr V d $ �m IRjl^ LL N N J O C N E L U fb fit a ° m 0 ,P �j Ss$c pi Kcm EcG t c5 $Qra E:E c$ LL1 N s al ���wp `o E�. °eS $iO FL i esE W C W 85K n 9 °@ °drab ri .a 8 E cagy :y �55 RZ S.i �g §s28E° 8 8 S £° $ ''jP .D�4c a8 s 8 €53£ g°S C Eli! a c� `>lQo§a '12 1.1 mOe �i Pi�L+ ate° gaP a53g'Au€iYe� s =g �°.� $ew8 QQQS2 .g2 •Eg ° .`o ,^yOeSE eRp�ceF °c!$ P, €$ g8 H95SiS: �� Z � wy ce�Sc�j aia o.ce n U5}_+ P•.cbaE� Z ° G E S bo- is- REEiiPP MIA cp �ggE °.$nUac$5 inR El e o f o c 'o �m£i� ai a.:E MV i3 u °ice g <y PE ° `2 2 o_cc W gc�w s. iE• cm$'.y°.° i ofi'S° O yy y T. 3 i °U OCV pRpS °�i s °gs g2`oR iii $�= $3$�g�g$�s ma�aa� IE pj 3vEEE .I E '°�P8 €Z_ v° �g1En oi.°�O W c�S!Y,P. g�°o8$o WaS°g?`�e°a c °C2$'°RC C�Z¢ ig =-'-H$ -Sga° $cU = D a$GS$Ec8.". °dE9cve`cj °�- $$2'rS °3 51°3$£LE O1S ui Z Z $ o o$ -a g°S muBrC�rc A. S?P S c 1p9- a P'$C EIae a. E.S a.B °u6a2 11""a-9 Fd $°$aP9�$_�5 °a as °�° c°$$a'c me 6 EYY g<° a >� n �Enngp a P'S •C£° $ °2$ °€ " Hill STi .a�£ W Mai U i wPge gU mnE £ ys °.Q,9v .c Sy°£aa.P .. E•sa $ �am<H .35 z W�% i5° a €tj is �m-r$ � C�33 pg 2.5 � a8 Z� °i $;ia e°£o mom$ ff11 c 6 m K8a 1S° $ca°re R�oaEecopri. a'O oHU -- "' 00 w g $ag$a$8i €E >caS ° °O°°o�aEE °4cnE £E 6e P� °� ��oY .. `m E ^E�a$Qm$OO =_�tFV E m�-PU P e �m_Q141 3'! \ ) . •.� Lb . k /�! # !!_•! .| ƒ f E E a| gt ! R� $ k■�� | � !! !Z| | qgz $ 3 |/\ JR \T I \ ikv .� This Page Intentionally Left Blank 3.0 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR 3.1 Introduction A draft version of this Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was circulated for public review from December 10, 2007 to January 23, 2008. The following is a listing of the names and addresses of persons, organizations, and public agencies that commented during this public review period. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City of Lake Elsinore has evaluated the comments on environmental issues received from those agencies /parties and has prepared written responses to each pertinent comment relating to the adequacy of the environmental analysis contained within the Draft EIR. These responses are contained in the Responses to Comments Section of the Final EIR. The agencies, organizations, and interested persons listed on the Responses to Comments Index submitted comments on the Draft EIR during the public review period. Each comment submitted in writing is included, along with a written response where determined necessary. Each comment letter is identified with a letter in the upper right corner of the first page of the letter. The individual comments have been given reference numbers, which appear in the right margin next to the bracketed comment. For example, Letter B will have comment numbers B -1, B -2, B -3, etc. In response to comments received, certain revisions have been made to the EIR. These revisions to the Draft EIR are presented in strike/underline format in the Final EIR Errata and consist of changes to text that clarify information; they do not constitute significant new information that changes the outcome of the environmental analysis or necessitate recirculation of the document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5). All such changes are noted in the responses to comments in Chapter 2 of the Final EIR. 3.2 Errata 1. After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Table S -1 of the DEIR Executive Summary: Mitigation Measure for Impact 3.4.5.e Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts through: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR April, 2008. Page 3 -1 implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program; • the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation Section of the Community Form Chapter; • implementation of improvements tc the alignment of Cambern Avenue identified in the Traffic Study. signalization and the curve radius for from 2nd Street to Camino Del Norte Mitigation Measure for Impacts 3.7.4.c and 3.7.4e Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan and District Plans will be required to demonstrate a reduction in impacts on wetlands through implementation of the Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 2, Policy 2.2. Adherence to the relevant GPU policies and the Land Use Plan would prevent significant impacts on wetlands. Individual environmental review conducted for future development projects will be required to identify any impacts on wetlands and, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies and applicable regional plans, must ensure incorporation of adequate mitigation to preserve the viability of these important biological resources. Mitigation Measure for Impact 3.8.4a The following goals and policies of the GPU must be implemented as a part of future development to mitigate potential impacts associated with 1) alteration of drainage patterns and associated erosion; 2) development within the 100 year floodplain; and 3) water quality: Hazard Policies 6.1 -6.8 Water Resources Policies 4.1 -4.6 and 5.1 -5.8 Open Space PG"GY 3.5 Policies 3.2 and 3.5 Biology Policies 1.1 -1.11 and 2.1 -2.2 2. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to page 2 -53, paragraph 2 of the DEIR: The existing vacant land is currently planned to remain designated as preserved open space in accordance with the areas described for conservation as a part of the MSHCP. 3. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to page 2 -58, paragraph 4 of the DEIR: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3.2 This differs from the Preferred Land Use Plan, which designates these areas as low— medium, medium -, and high- density residential with a smaller A42HCP buffer from the river within areas described for conservation as a part of the MSHCP. 4. In response to comments received during public review, the following revisions have been made to page 3.1 -12 of the DEIR: Land use within the City and SOI is also influenced by the MSHCP, a multi - jurisdictional habitat management and planning program that seeks to conserve biological and ecological diversity and integrity in western Riverside County. The MSHCP for western Riverside County was adopted June 17, 2003, and has 16 area plans, including the Lake Elsinore Area Plan (which includes the City and the nearby City of Canyon Lake). The MSHCP is intended to conserve and restore natural habitat, and preserve biological and ecological diversity in Western Riverside. -The 5. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to page 3.1 -17, paragraph 3 of the DEIR: Open Space /Recreation Designations. Currently, within the City and SO[, approximately 665 acres are identified as parks and open space and approximately 44,889 acres identified as vacant land. The Preferred Land Use Plan would allow for approximately 15,438 acres of permanent open space and recreation and MSHCP Conservation areas. Approximately 13,525 acres will be designated as open space and 1,913 acres as recreation. ; between 4,830 d 7,870 aeFes of land One of the conditions of the permits associated with the MSHCP is that the City and other Permittees must contribute to the MSHCP Reserve Assembly. The permits were issued based upon an ultimate Reserve System of 500,000 acres Of that 500,000 acres 347,000 acres are designated Public /Quasi - Public lands and are already conserved The acquisition of the remaining 153,000 acres is the responsibility of the Permittees wanin the Elsinore Area Plan The total amount of land dedicated to these land uses decreases under the Preferred Land Use Plan primariry due to population growth and development of residential areas to accommodate this growth. However, a portion of the currently vacant land will be permanently set aside as open space or conservation areas to protect natural resources as growth continues. Parks and recreation designations increase under the Preferred Land Use Plan to accommodate growth and the growing tourism industry in the City. Potential impacts of reduced open space include air quality, natural resources, noise, and aesthetics. The increased growth in these areas will also contribute to traffic and community services impacts that will need to be addressed as development plans are made. Potential impacts on traffic, aesthetics, air quality, noise, and community services resulting from increased open space and recreation land uses are addressed in goals and policies and are discussed in the Residential Land Use Designations Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -3 section above. The policies under Goals 1, 2, and 3 of the Community Form chapter Land Use section address the creation of recreational opportunities for parks, facilities, and open space. Policies under Goals 23 and 24 of the Community Form chapter Parks and Recreation section address the standards to be met and the availability of parks and recreational facilities in new developments. The policies under Goals 1 and 2 of the Resource Protection chapter Biological Resources section and Goal 3 of the Resource Protection chapter, Open Space section address the standards to be met and availability of open space areas. Policies under Goals 9 and 10 of the Resource Protection chapter Aesthetics section address utilizing open space to preserve the City's non -urban visual character. 6. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to page 3.1 -30, Table 3:1 -5 — Northwestern Sphere of the DEIR: The goals of this District Plan are to accommodate future growth, use 1 -15 as a commercial center, and preserve open space and views. District policies include creation of a compatible residential land use network, maximization of the general commercial area, and preservation of vacant lands through conservation of existing vacant lands planned as KASHCo r t A d links within areas described for conservation as a part of the MSHCP. 7. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to page 3.1 -31, Table 3.1 -5 — North Central Sphere of the DEIR: Existing vacant land weald be ^r arin,ed fe described for conservation as a part of the MSHCP could Would be preserved as open space. Existing vacant land would also be converted to residential and commercial uses. Existing residential and commercial uses would be expanded. 8. After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Chapter 3.4.1 of the DEIR to revise information presented on intersections to reflect recent changes to existing condition's. The changes to existing conditions status of these intersections do not change the overall conclusions of the Traffic Study or the DEIR: Page 3.4 -13: Lake Street south of the 1 -15 to Lakeshore Drive is a two -lane undivided roadway. South of Lakeshore Drive, it becomes Grand Avenue and it has been widened to a four -lane divided roadway. Lake Street provides major access to northern areas of the City from the 1 -15. Mission Trail from RailFOad GaRyon Read Diamond Drive to Palomar Street, mostly a four -lane undivided roadway, is an important route south of the commercial area at the Railroad Canyon Road/ Diamond Drive interchanqe with the 1 -15. Portions of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR _ April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3-4 roadway in the vicinity of Bundy Canyon Road have been widened to a four -lane divided section roadway. Grand Avenue between Riverside Drive and Corydon Street is a two -lane undivided roadway. This north /south route is the only through roadway on the west side of the lake, and provides an important connection to SR -74 from the area south of the lake. Page 3.4 -17: o Ortega Highway (EW) /SR -74 o Collier Avenue (NS) /SR -74 at: Page 3.4 -18: Diamond Drive (Extension of Railroad Canyon Road) (NS) at: 9. After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Chapter 3.4 Table 3.4 -1 of the DEIR to revise information presented on intersections to reflect recent changes to existing conditions. The changes to existing conditions status of these intersections do not change the overall conclusions of the Traffic Study or the DEIR: #103 Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Rd. (EVV) (has been signalized) #110 Grand Avenue (NS) at Ortega Hwy, (EVV) (has been signalized) #111 Collier Ave. (NS) at Riverside Dr. (EVV) (has been widened) #112 Riverside Street at SR -74 (EVV) (has been signalized) #114 Rosetta Canyon Drive at SR -74 (EVV) (has been signalized) #115 Cambern Avenue (NS) at SR -74 (EVV) (has been signalized) #123 Summerhill Dr. /Grape Street (NS) at Railroad Canyon Road (geometric change has been made) #124 Railroad Canyon Rd (NS) at 1 -15 NB (EVV) (geometric change has been made) #125 Diamond Dr. (NS) at: 1 -15 SB (EW) (geometric change has been made) 10.After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Chapter 3.4 page 3.4 -63 of the DEIR to revise information presented on intersections to reflect recent changes to existing conditions. The changes to existing conditions status of these intersections do not change the overall conclusions of the Traffic Study or the DEIR: City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -5 Riverside Street (NS) at: SR -74 (EW) (has been signalized) Rosetta Canyon Drive (NS) at: SR -74 (EW) (has been signalized) Franklin Street (NS) at: Auto Center Drive (EW) (has been signalized) 11. After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Chapter 3.4 page 3.4 -69 of the DEIR: Additional recent analysis specifically addressing the Preferred Land Use Plan uses for the 3rd Street Annexation area of the North Central Sphere area has also been completed in conjunction with the overall General Plan update traffic technical analysis for the City of Lake Elsinore (3rd Street Annexation Area Revised Land Use Street Annexation Environmental Analysis Lake Elsinore, California February 2008, Project Design Consultants. TraffiG Engineering Se WiG^^ I Fban Crossroads Inn August, ^^7 included in as Appendix B to this document) and indicates that the proposed land uses, consistent with the updated 3rd Street Annexation Area land use plan addressed in the Updated Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Alternatives Trip Generation Evaluation (included in Appendix C to this document), will not adversely affect traffic conditions in the potential impact area. 12.After further review of the document following public review, the following changes have been made to Chapter 3.4 page 3.4 -93 of the DEIR: Mitigation Measure for Impact 3.4.5.e Individual projects implemented pursuant to the Preferred Land Use Plan within the 3rd Street Annexation will be required to demonstrate their avoidance of significant impacts through: implementation of the ultimate roadway and intersection classifications and improvements shown on the Preferred Land Use plan and the Capital Improvement Program; the goals and policies set forth by the Circulation Section of the Community Form Chapter; implementation of improvements to signalization and the curve radius for the alignment of Cambern Avenue from 2nd Street to Camino Del Norte identified in the Traffic Study. City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -6 13.After further review of the document Figure 3.4 -12 — 3rd Street Annexation Project Site Plan has been deleted. The proposed site plan for the 3rd Street Annexation is shown in Figure 2 -1 — Preferred Land Use Plan and Figure 2 -18 — Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations 3rd Street Annexation of the DEIR. 14. In response to comments received during public review Figure 3.7 -1 and Table 3.7 -1 have been deleted. In addition the text on pages 3.7 -1 and page 3.7 -8 referencing table 3.7 -1 has been deleted: 15. In response to comments received during public review on the MSHCP, Figure 3.7 -2 has been replaced with an exhibit showing MSHCP criteria cell information and renumbered as 3.7 -1. The revised Figure 3.7 -1 is included in these Errata. In addition, the discussion on pages 3.7 -14 -15 of the DEIR under the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan heading has been deleted and replaced with the following: rawcisiue %-.uuncy. i ne rlan seeKS to conserve biological resources by establishing a network of Conservation Areas (consisting of Core Reserves and Linkages) that would reserve in perpetuity open space to be maintained pursuant to the guidelines and regulations regarding land use habitat preservation and species conservation Overall. the Plan area covers approximately 1 26 million acres which is broken down Into 16 area plans The City and SOI are completely within the Elsinore Area Plan which also encompasses the entirety of the City of Canyon Lake and additional unincorporated County land outside the City's Sol. The MSHCP provides a strategy for balancing the need to conserve open space and the need to convert open space to non -open space uses while protecting the region's economy; preserving land owner rights providinq for the long-term management of plant, fish and wildlife species especially those that are listed or may be listed in the future under the Federal Endangered Species Act or the California Endangered Species Act providing and maintaining multi use open space that would contribute to the quality of life of residents of and visitors to the plan area: and accommodating a growing population while minimizing costs to proiect proponents and society at large. The MSHCP serves as the Habitat Conservation Plan pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) under the NCCP Act of 2001 The MSHCP City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final OR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Paue 3 -7 allows for the Permittees (i.e., City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, the other 14 participating cities, etc.) to authorize "take" of plant and wildlife species identified within the Plan area for private and public works proiects. Under the MSHCP, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game, herein referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, have granted take authorization in exchange for the assembly and management of the MSHCP Conservation Area. One of the conditions of the permits associated with the MSHCP is that the City and other Permittees must contribute to the MSHCP Reserve Assembly. The permits were issued based upon an ultimate Reserve System of 500,000 acres. Of that responsibility of the Permittees. The City is focusing on adding lands to existing and proposed cores and linkages within the Elsinore Area Plan. Refer to Figure 3.7 -1 MSHCP Criteria Cells which shows the cells applicable to the City and SOL To meet the goals and objectives of the MSHCP and to comply with the permits issued and enhancement being implemented over the 75 -year term of the two permits. The obiective of the approved MSHCP is to provide landowners, developers, and reviews proposed development in the Criteria Area to determine consistency with the MSHCP. In some circumstances, development within areas described for conservation may be allowed assuming proper MSHCP processing has been completed. The City is in the process of updating its MSHCP Implementation of the MSHCP. Consistency reviews for proposed development within Criteria Cells also require a Joint Project Review with the Regional Conservation Authority. The City's MSHCP Implementation Guidelines will also include mapping as well as 16. In response to comments received during public review the following revisions have been made to pages 2 -11, 3.7 -22, 3.7 -24, 3.7 -25 -30 and page 3.7 -37 to correct the policy numbering for Biological Resources policies to reflect the latest General Plan Update: Resource Protection and Preservation Chapter, Biological Resources Section, Goal 1, Policies 1.1 -1.112 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft OR Page 3-8 17. In response to comments received during public review the following text has been added to page 3.8 -14, paragraph 2 of the DEIR: Alteration of drainage patterns would result in substantial erosion within the City. Impacts on drainage patterns within the City and SOI can be mitigated by goals and policies of the GPU. The following goals and policies for biological resources, open space, and water quality address the hydrologic resources issues. Biological Resources Policies 1.1 -1.4 require the City to adhere to MSHCP policies and encourage barriers between development and areas described for conservation as a part of the MSHCP G^^ a ^4ation ^,.re-a_, and deny grading plans for slopes that extend into these areas. These policies protect the water and hydrology of the San Jacinto River, which is proposed to have a buffer of open space and MSHCP land. In addition, Policy 2.2 discourages development in riparian areas, which will help protect the natural drainages from alteration. Open Space Policy 3.5 prevents development on steep slopes (greater than 35 percent incline), which would also prevent drainage alterations on the hillsides throughout the City. 18. In response to comments received from the Regional Water Quality Control Board the following text has been added to Chapter 3.8.3.3 of the DEIR: Groundwater subbasin boundaries are included in the RWQCB Basin Plan. The latest subbasin boundaries were determined as a part of a 2004 update of the Basin Plan. The Groundwater subbasins now referred to as Groundwater Management Zones (GMZ) located within the City of Elsinore and the surrounding areas are shown in Figure FEIR -1. As shown in the Figure the Elsinore GMZ surrounds the Lake and the Warm Springs Valley GMZ extends within the northern portion of the City. The GMZ boundaries were defined on the basis of (1) separation by Impervious rock formations or other groundwater barriers: (2) distinct flow systems defined consistent hydraulic gradients that prevent widespread intermixing; and (3) distinct differences In water quality. Agriculture. Groundwater quality obiectives for GMZ's have also been identified by the RWQCB Water quality oblectives for TDS and Nitrogen levels for the Elsinore GMZ are Identified in Table 4 -1 of the Basin Plan Groundwater quality management is considered as a part of the General Plan policies. As discussed In Water Resources policy 5 6 the City will work with water agencies to improve groundwater quality including surface and groundwater hydrology. In addition as noted in Water Resources policy 5 2 the policy of the City is to develop clean water systems to reduce pollutants being discharged into the drainage system to the maximum extent feasible and meet required federal NPDES City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Pane 3 -9 requirements. As discussed in Water Resources policy 5.5. the City will also take into account impacts to beneficial uses during environmental review of development proiects. With implementation of the policies of the General Plan future proiects will be required by the City to address degradation of surface and groundwater hydrology and incorporate measures necessary to minimize impacts to water courses and receiving waters to the extent required by Federal NPDES requirements and that required by the Open Space and Biological resources preservation policies of the General Plan. 19. In response to comments received during public review the following text has been added to page 3.11 -7, paragraph 3 of the DEIR: Subsequent amendments to the General Plan would be reviewed to ensure consistency is maintained between the proposed GPU and any update to the Housing Element. City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3.10 3.3 General Plan Update Policy Changes The following changes were made to policies contained in the December 2007 Draft General Plan Update based on comments received during public review of the Draft General Plan Update and based on further review by the City Planning Division. Chapter 3- Public Safety and Welfare 3.3.10 Flooding and Floodplains Goals and Policies 6.4 enh °n"° existing °` ,=parian habitat. that new developments within the floodplain fringe shall preserve as well as restore and enhance disturbed riparian habitat back to native conditions Chapter 4 — Resource Protection and Preservation 4.2.5 Biological Resources Goals and Policies 1.1 SpeGieS Habitat Gonservation Plan, the LEAPS PFGgFarn, and the Implementing property owners to stFategiGally -assemble nonseRtatien aGreage. The City shall continue to participate in the MSHCP pursuant to the MSHCP Implementing Agreement through the LEAP and JPR as well as ensure compliance with Section 6.0 requirements. The City shall continue to coordinate with propertv owners the Wildlife agencies, and the other Permittees to strategically assemble conservation acreage. 1.2 Develop conservation and land use planning strategies that facilitate the attainment of additional lands contributing to 153.000 -acre Reserve Assembly in compliance with the MSS -ICP the Section 10(a) incidental take permit the NCCP permit and the MSHCP Implementing Agreement. 1.3 I=nn ° the installation F NIFFieF F GthRF h ff h fi A42HCP OF RGOmpatible with +hP Consengatinn A real; in Order to minimize publiG aGGess, dOMe6tiG animal predation, GF dumping an the GanseWatinn Areas Encourage the installation of barrier fencing or other buffers between MSHCP Conservation Areas and private /public land uses that may be incompatible with conservation areas in order to minimize illegal /unauthorized public access domestic animal predation and dumping Such barrier fencing shall be evaluated in the context of appropriate animal movement City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -11 1.4 Grading plans that °nMa clan° marl ifinnf;_ ° }_ dfi into MSHGP Gonsewation native plant mixture The City shall discourage manufactured slopes associated with proposed development from extending into MSHCP Conservation Areas. Should there be any inadvertent vegetation removal to slopes or buffer areas between development and conservation areas, revegetation with an appropriate native plant mixture is required. 1.12 µ}jii;z° the s, Its of the ,a1 I wnd I lce Plan revipw to detilnn the f"fi' (`npoeptual Reoewe florin nrdanne ,.dth C t' Z 7 Q f the MCHGP as ended and m rely upon the flexibility p m'tted by the MC1..1f`D ' d P the Resep a ^6semhly^onnl tong se for in Seetien 6.7 of the MSHCP. The City <I1�1 CrJGI V.r) [99G 1 [90�Gn i shall update its MSHCP Implementation Guidelines to explain how projects are processed consistent with the MSHCP. The City shall conduct an annual review of its land use in relation to the conservation area mapping to assess orderly and balanced development. The City may develop its Conceptual Reserve Design in accordance with Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, and may rely upon the flexibility permitted by the MSHCP in conducting Reserve Assembly Accounting consistent with Section 6.7. to the MSHCP. Development of property outside of the MSHCP Conservation Area (both within and outside of the Criteria Areal shall receive Take Authorization the MSHCP occurs. Impacts to species not covered by the MSHCP. or only conditionally covered, may require additional mitigation. 2.1 of petential impacts to any plant er wildlife species that i mffo;alllisted as threatened n endangered by the United States Fish .. d Widl'f Rewine a d/ th° rerfern. a. Department of Gish and Game but not n d by thp nnCo SHGP In addition to the MSHCP LEAP and Section 6.0, all biological analyses for proposed projects shall include a discussion of potential impacts to plant and animal species their associated habitats, or to their activities (e.g. , nesting) as regulated separate from the MSHCP. All potential impacts to biological resources, including those covered under the MSHCP. shall be included in environmental documents in accordance with full disclosure requirements pursuant to CEQA. 2.2 0 Final EIR Errata - Changes Made to Dreg EIR Page 3 -12 iRGluding areas the 1 _ - - • SP9Gies shall be d'SG961raged. Further, development in areas desnr'bprl fn I _ _ tive, plant SPeGies shall he drafted j Development in and/or Fish and Game Code 1600 and Porter - Cologne Water Quality Act Further, development in areas that contain riparian /riverine resources as defined in the MSHCP or that encompass areas planned for restoration /enhancement shall also be discouraged. 4.3.4 Open Space Goals and Policies 3.4 Encourage open space easement dedication in undisturbed and /or revegetated areas on private property, regardless of its MSHCP designation, and assign the ongoing maintenance responsibility where feasible to a homeowners association or individual property owners. 3.5 PFeyent Require development on steep slopes of greater than 35% incline occurring in public or private property to adhere to and develop planning and engineering design to blend into and practice contour grading where feasible 3.6 Encourage dedication of open space easements in promect areas containing residual non - developed steep slopes. 4.4.3 Water Resources Goals and Policies 4.6 Encourage landscaping and irrigation that is planned with consideration of water conservation, through the use of non - invasive, drought - tolerant native plant species, and low water irrigation systems. 5.1 Provide for or require phosphorus removal for all tertiary effluent proposed to be discharged into Lake Elsinore. 5.5 Require Best Management PFact'Ges­_a����� Require Best Management Practices and design guidelines for development in order to meet the Federal NPDES permit requirements as well as encouraging new developments to minimize impacts to beneficial uses of waters and to comply with TMDL requirements as identified in the Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Basin Plan. :. 4. _ City shall GGRtiRue to werk with the water agenaies_��� quality to redUGe and treat degFaded water Anil IAAFM water asSOGiatpa with 11rb;;n land lu;ps The City shall work with water agencies .. - - Final Errata— .Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -13 groundwater quality including consideration of surface and groundwater hydrology, to reduce and treat degraded water and storm water associated with urban land uses. 4.6.3 Aesthetics Goals and Policies 10.2 Encourage the dedication of open space areas within hillside development proposals to preserve and enhance view opportunities from transportation corridors and surrounding development. 11.1 9isseurage Assure that mining or other extractive activity from being conducted in highly visible areas and require provides for reclamation of these mining areas. If such uses must occur in visible area, the City shall require extensive visual screening with landscaping and /or fencing. 11.3 Require grading plans for any hillside development to include specifications for native landscape revegetation and new planting to minimize hillside scarring. Alberhill District Plan AH3.5 I GGAtE nrnArriental trees along Lake Street The City shall ensure that street City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3.14 3.4 Modifications to DER Figures City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Fir Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR This Page Left Intentionally Blank City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -16 This Page Intentionally Left Blank m i i ig f � 3rd Fad ry 1LLiIA ow ,x C g N R LL C N fi m g E ¢ o m a IL E @ ° � s� a o 1LLiIA ow ,x R N O m C O This Page Intentionally Left Blank 3.5 Additions to Appendix B of DER idly or Laae tismore ueneral Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Dmft EIR Page 008 This Page Left Intentionally Blank City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR April, 2008 Final EIR Errata — Changes Made to Draft EIR Page 3 -18 Third Street Annexation to the City of Lake Elsinore Environmental Analysis The intent of the General Plan Update's Hillside Residential land use designation is to minimize the alteration of steep hillsides resulting from residential development and to preserve hillsides with an average slope exceeding 40 %. Minimum parcel sizes for this land use designation are dependent on the predominant slope of the area. Densities for the Hillside Residential land use designation range from one dwelling unit per acre to one dwelling unit per 10 acres, depending on the average slope. Summary of Impacts The proposed change in the land use designation for the steep hillsides in the southern portion of the Third Street Annexation area from Freeway Commercial to Hillside Residential would reduce the extent of grading resulting from development consistent with those land use designations. Large flat pads are typically required for Freeway Commercial development, and would require extensive landform alteration of the steep hillsides in the southern portion of the project area to develop consistent with this land use designation under the adopted General Plan. In contrast, future development of these steep hillsides consistent with the Hillside Residential land use designation in the General Plan Update would result in substantially less landform alteration since the amount of residential development that may occur in the future would be limited based on the predominant slope. Future development proposals would be reviewed for consistency with the slope -based densities established by the Hillside Residential land use designation to avoid significant landform alterations resulting from hillside development. IV. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION The analysis of traffic impacts discussed below for the Third Street Annexation is a worst -case analvsis based on an earlier version of the land use plan that included more dwelling units and consequently generated more traffic. Table 12 identifies the original land uses that were analyzed in the traffic analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads fa total of 2,294 dwelling units). The proposed uses included in the Preferred Land Use Plan in the Draft General Plan Update includes a total of 736 -1,494 dwelling units. Although the number of residential units has decreased a greater area has been set aside for mixed -use development The trip generation rates for commercial use are dependent upon the quantity of retail use anticipated Consequently, the commercial retail trip generation rates have changed The other trip rates are unchanged from the previous analysis Urban Crossroads prepared a supplemental analysis of the revised land use plan which shows that the revised plan will generate less traffic both on a daily basis and during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic (Refer to Appendix B) Therefore no additional analvsis is required to evaluate the revised land uses included in the Preferred Land Use Plan The traffic study for the General Plan Update, prepared by Urban Crossroads, includes an analysis of the Third Street Annexation. The Third Street Annexation is specifically covered in the "Special Issues" section of the General Plan Update Traffic Study. A separate letter report summarizing the findings of the traffic analysis for the General Plan preferred alternative is included as Appendix A of this report. August -2097- January 2008 31 This Page Intentionally Left Blank February 8, 2008 41 Corporate Park,Soite300 Irvine, CA 92606 949,660.1994 main 9419.660.1911 fax rvww.urbanxroadsfom Ms. Sandra Massa -Lavitt CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject. 3rd Street Annexation Area Revised Land Use Trip Generation Evaluation Dear Ms. Massa- Lavitt: INTRODUCTION Urban Crossroads is pleased to submit this letter report documenting the supplemental analysis of trip generation associated with the revised land uses for the proposed 3rd Street Annexation Project. The project is generally located south of SR -74, east of the 1 -15 Freeway and west of Cambern Avenue within the sphere of influence of the City of Lake Elsinore. The changes in the land use, compared to the data used in our previous analysis letter report dated August 8, 2006, are summarized in Attachment "A" to this letter. TRIP GENERATION Table 1 summarizes the revised (maximum density) land use data for the project. A total of 312 acres of residential and commercial land uses are proposed for development. The proposed land use includes a mix of residential and non- residential uses, while the current land use /zoning is predominately freeway business use (with some residential units anticipated). Compared to the previously evaluated land use plan, lower density residential uses are being proposed. A greater area is planned for mixed -use development in the revised land plan. The existing land use includes retail use, restaurants, and a gas station along SR -74 and vacant lots and scattered buildings along 2nd Street and 3rd Street. The latest 03995 -03 Ms, Sandra Massa -Lavitt CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE February 8, 2008 Page 2 version (7th Edition) of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation has been used to calculate the proj ect area trip generation. The trip generation rates are show n on Table 2. The trip rates for commercial (retail) use are dependent upon the quantity of retail use anticipated. Therefore, the commercial retail trip generation rates have changed. The other trip rates are unchanged from the previous analysis. Table 2 also includes the trip generation rates for the current zoning land uses. It is assumed that 80 percent of the freeway business land use will consist of general commercial (retail) uses; while 20 percent will consist of business park use. Table .3 summarizes the revised trip generation for the 3rd Street Annexation Area, Both daily and peak hour trip; generation for the anticipated future development are shown in Table 3. The anticipated future development under the proposed land use designation is projected to generate a total of approximately 23,559 trip -ends per day with 1,255 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 2,252 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. These figures reflect an internal capture rate of 15 %, which is conservatively low for a mixed -use development area, The daily and peak hour trip generation for the current zoning land uses are also shown on Table 3. The anticipated future development under the current zoning is projected to generate a total of approximately 41,629 trip -ends per day with 1,691 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 4,027 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. These figures reflect also an internal capture rate of 15 %. Comparing the revised proposed land use development trip generation and the current zoning land use development trip generation, the proposed development represents a reduction of 18,070 (previously 16,944) daily trips.. AM peak hour trip generation will be reduced by 436 (previously 103) vehicle trips, while the PM peak hour trip will be reduced by 1,775 (previously 1,637) vehicle trips. SUMMARY AND CLOSING Based upon our analysis of the trip generation for the revised land use plan, the revised plan will generate less traffic both on a daily basis and during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic. Therefore, 03995 -03 TABLE 1 CURRENT ZONING AND PROPOSED LAND USE' (REVISED) LAND USE CURRENTZONING PROPOSED APPROX. ACRES DENSITY DU'S APPROX. ACRES DENSITY DU'S Hillside Residential 0 N/A 0 54 1 54 Low ' 0 1 0 - 62 1 62 Low Medium 65 6 390 24 6 144 Medium 0 12 0 15 18 270 Ramsgate Specific Plan Med - Low 0 5 0 87 267 s Mixed Use 0 N/A 0 39 18 702 General Commercial 0 NI—A.-0 13 —NIA 0 Business Park 0 N/A 0 18 NJ—LA 0 Preewa Business 247 NIA 0 0 N/A 0 Total 312 390 312 1 499 ' Note: Table excludes area associated with main roads. Densities shown are the maximum desntities permitted. Denstities have not yet been approved and are subject to change. z Ramsgate Specific Plan units based on approved unit count, rather than density range. U:1UcJobsl_03600- 04000\_03900t039951Excei \[03995- 03.xISIT 1 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES' (REVISED) LAND USE ITE CODE QUANTITY UNITS PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES DAILY AM I PM IN OUT ITOTALI IN I OUT ITOTALI Single. Family Residentia 210 527 DU 0.19 0.56 0.75 .0.64 0.37 1.01 9.57 Residential Condo/Townhouse 230 972 DU 0.07 0.37 0,44 0.35 0.17 .0.52 5.86 Commercial (462.084 TSr 820 462.084 TSF 0.52 0.33 0.85 1.79 1.93 3.72 39.75 Business Park3,5 770 250.906 TSF 1.20 0.23 1.43 0:3 .0.99 1.29 1276. Single Family Residentiah 210 390 DU 0.19 0.56 035 0.64 0.37 1.01 9.57 Commercial (2,065.789 TSFs") 820 2,065.789 TSF 0.28 0.18 0.46 1.07 1.16 2.23. 23,53_ F_ Business ark 770 688.596 TSF 1.20 0.23 1.43 0.3 0.99 1.29 12.76 Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 2003. 2 DU = Dwelling Units, TSF = Thousand Square Feet 3 Based. on Proposed Land Use Types as Shown in Table 1. ` 462.084 TSF is based on a 0.80 Net -to -Gross Area Factor and a 0.3 Floor -to -Area Ratio applied to the gross site acreage of 31.2 acres (Mixed Use (80% of 39 acres)) plus 13 acres (General Commercial). 5 250.906 TSF is based on a 0.80 Net-to -Gross Area Factor and a 0.4 Floor- to-Area Ratio applied to the gross site acreage of 18 acres. 6 Based on Current Zoning Land Use Types as Shown in Table 1. 2,065.789 TSF is based on a 0.80 Net -to -Gross Area Factor and a 0.3 Floor -to -Area Ratio applied to the gross site acreage of 247 acres and the assumption that 80 % of Freeway Business is General Commercial land use. a 688.596 TSF is based on a 0.80 Net -to -Gross Area Factor and a 0.4 Floor -to -Area Ratio applied to the gross site acreage of 247 acres and the assumption that 20% of Freeway Business is Business Park land use. U: \UcJobs \_ 03600 - 04000\_ 03900 103995%Excel\[03995- 03.xis]7 2 TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (REVISED) LAND USE IQUANTI . UNITS' PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL PROPOSED .DEVELOPMENI: Single Family Residential Residential Condo/Townhouse 527 972 DU DU 100 68 295 360 395 428 337 3401-1-65-F505 1 195 1 532 5,043 .5,696 Commercial 462,084TSF 462.084 TSF 240 152 393 827 892 1,719 .18;368 Pass-By Trips 25 %0.._ - - -60 38 -98 -207 -223. -430 -4;592 Commercial Sub -Total 180 114 - 295 620 669 - " 1,289. 13,776 Business Park 250.906 TSF 301 58 359 75 248 324 ..3,202 OVERALL SUB -TOTAL 650 827 1,476 1,373 1,277.. 2,650 27.717 Internal Capture.(15%0) 15 % -97 -124 -221 -206 -192 -398. :-4,158 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 553 703 1,255 1,167 1,085 2,252 23,559 CURRENT ZONING DEVELOPMENT: Single Family Residential 1 390 DU 74 1 218 293 250 1 144 394 3,732 Commercial 2,065.789 TSF). 2,065789 DU 578 1 372 950 2,210 2,396 4,607 48,608 Pass-By Trips ('25%)l - 145 -93. -238 553 - 599 - 1,152- 12,152 Commercial Sufi -Total 33 279 712 1,657 1,797 3,455. 36,456 Business Park - 688.596 1 TSF 826 158 985 207 1 682 888. 8;786 OVERALL SUB -TOTAL 1,334 656 1.,989 2,114: 2;623 4,737. 48,975 Internal Capture 90" 15% -200 -98 -298 -317 -393 -710 -7,346 CURRENTZONINGTOTAL .1,134 558 1,691 1,797 .2,230 4,027 41,629 IFFERENCE Proposed - Current -581 145 -436 -630 -1 ;145 - 1,775 - 18;070 PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED DIFFERENCE 538 435 -103 -480 -1,157 -1,637 - 16,944 CHANGE -43 -290 -333 -150 12 -138 .1,126 %CHANGE -8.0% - 66.6% - 323.3% - 31.2% 1.0% -8.40A .6.6% ' DU = Dwelling Units, TSF = Thousand Square Feet UAUWobs \_03600- 04000 \_ 03900 1039951ExceIl103995- 03.xIsIT 3 ATTACHMENT A Revised Land Use Information Third Street Annexation to the City of Lake Elsinore Environmental Analysis Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed land use designations for the Third Street Annexation. The existing plan calls for the majority of the area to be developed with freeway business uses (See Figure S - laristing General Plan Land Uses). The General Plan Update proposes a greater mix of land uses within the annexation area. The General Plan Update would provide a�approximatel °ate °'41 additional acres of low- medium residential designated land and convert approximately 238-247 acres of freeway business designated land into a more integrated community complete with a variety of residential uses which will help to support the proposed commercial and business park designations (See Figure 6 - Proposed General Plan Land Uses). TABLE 1 Existing and Proposed Land Uses Note: Table exdades exec- apnroximately five. f5) acres associated with main roads. Bea,'!'•_::'_;��.�:: _ e '!:_ . Aensities have not yet been approved and are subject to change. C Pre- zoning Riverside County LAFCO requires that territory be "pre- zoned" prior to annexation. This permits property owners and other interested parties to be informed of future City zoning and permitted land uses prior to finalization of any proposed annexation. As such, the City of Lake Elsinore must approve pre - zoning for the annexation area consistent with the General Plan Update land use designations before the annexation application can be submitted to LAFCO_ Figure 7 - Pre - Zoning illustrates the proposed pre - zoning to implement the General Plan Update land use designations for the Third Street Village Area. The zoning districts that will implement the General Plan Update land uses include: dune-2086January 2008 7 &i30_1- 95 -54 Hillside Residential 0 NfAl -3.6 0 37:55!1 I.0 — LowAensZty 0 I 0 62 1 62 Low Medium . ? 65 438 65- dSd ?4 I.6 44842 ,�6 390 44 Medium 0 7 -12 0 34415 1-18 44105 - 270 Ramsgate Snecific Plan 0 3.63.6 =5.0 0 37 3.6 - -.0 — L 67 2-. Med- Low Mixed Use 0 N/A 0 4- a4l- -9 2 -18. 24-7171- 7� General Cor ®ercial 0 N/A 0 8:6813 N/A 0 Business Park 0 N/A 0 46:5918 N/A 0 Freeway Business 237:46247 N!A 0 0 N/A 0 Total 310.38312 `3S65- 3411:38312 3394736- 390 1.499 Note: Table exdades exec- apnroximately five. f5) acres associated with main roads. Bea,'!'•_::'_;��.�:: _ e '!:_ . Aensities have not yet been approved and are subject to change. C Pre- zoning Riverside County LAFCO requires that territory be "pre- zoned" prior to annexation. This permits property owners and other interested parties to be informed of future City zoning and permitted land uses prior to finalization of any proposed annexation. As such, the City of Lake Elsinore must approve pre - zoning for the annexation area consistent with the General Plan Update land use designations before the annexation application can be submitted to LAFCO_ Figure 7 - Pre - Zoning illustrates the proposed pre - zoning to implement the General Plan Update land use designations for the Third Street Village Area. The zoning districts that will implement the General Plan Update land uses include: dune-2086January 2008 7 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 4 Land Use Request Letters and Responses CITY OF LADE V2, LSMOIZE D EXTREME- GENERAL PLAN RESPONSE LETTERS 1. Hardy Strozier 2. Tim and Denise Fleming 3. Don Summers 4. Don Summers 5. Don Summers 6. Gary Washburn 7. Gary Washburn 8. Gary Washburn 9. Carl Winkle 10. Alex Ghahremania 11. Bart Pebbles 12. Erik Lunde 13. John H. Johnson 14. Colin Drukker 15. Larry Plavala 16. Pete Reynen 17. Wayne Gunter 18. Charles G. Tunstall 19. Sonia and Sunil Shah 20. Steve Hunter 21. Jack R. Reimer 22. Christine A. Del Ross - Risher 23. Max Harrison 24. Rachel Schwenn 25. Ronald Slavick 26. Ed Lambert 27. Michael Quirk 28. Michael Quirk 29. Eugene Gabrych 30. Adam Dodge 31. Steve Johnson 32. Danny Brose 33. Danny Brose 34. Norman Harris 35. Norm Harris (Seers Family) 36. Richard Knapp 37. Randy Ziegler 38. Gloria Healy CITY OF LAKE LSI� I` 0U DREAM EXTREME April 8, 2008 Hardy Strozier The Planning Associates 3151 Airway Avenue Suite R -1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APNs 390 - 210 -014 & 019 known as the MCA Property Dear Hardy: This letter shall confirm that after extensive research staff has determined that the subject APNs 390 - 210 -014 & 019 otherwise known as "the MCA property" located within the City of Lake Elsinore will be designated Approved Specific Plan (dark Grey) or Alberhill Specific Plan. Additionally, you should know that the properties at the terminus of Lake Street, east of Interstate 15 have also been designated Alberhill Specific Plan or dark Grey. Further for your information staff has also placed an "extractive overlay" (cross hatched mark) over the MCA Property as well properties within the Sphere of Influence. Additionally, this letter shall confirm that the Reclamation Plan for the Mining within the MCA property is exempt from the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Should future development applications be submitted for this site, they will be processed in accordance with the MSHCP. This letter, as well as the letters submitted to the City, by the Planning Associates on January 9, 2007 and November 17, 2007, has also been included in the Staff Report as an attachment. Please be advised that the 15t Planning Commission Public Hearing located in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California will be held on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore org. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W WNLEAKE- ELSINORE.ORG The Planning Associates Jonathan Petke, Inc. Hardy M. Strozier, Inc. 3151 AIRWAY AVENUE, SUITE R -1 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 TELEPHONE: (714) 556 -5200 TELECOPIER: (714)556 -3905 E -Mail: HardyEsq @aol.com E -Mail: PlanningAssoc(a).aol.com January 9, 2007 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Community Development Director City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Re: MCA General Plan Land Use Designation Thank you for calling me yesterday and today about the MCA General Plan Land Use designation. I have provided to you, the PC and CC a letter dated November 17, 2005 that identified the MCA GP request. I also brought this GP request to Brian Mooney's attention when he met with me last year in my office where I gave him copies of the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan land Use maps which MCA is apart. During the recent GPAC GP land use meeting held on October 30, 2006 I reiterated the MCA GP land use request and provided to staff and the GPAC a copy of the November 17, 2005 MCA letter. You asked me to provide to you some language that could be used in the new GP land use section for MCA and to provide to you the Alberhill Ranch SP Land Use map for the MCA property. We discussed and generally agreed that the suggested 2007 GP language should be as follows and be similar to the suggested language in my November 17, 2005 letter (attached): "The MCA property is approximately 86 acres of City incorporated land. The 86 acres has historically and currently been used for mining and agriculture. The MCA property has an existing vested mining permit similar to other Alberhill Ranch SP properties (Nichols Canyon Mine). The MCA property is part of the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (SP). This SP land use plan left. open the future zoning designation for this 86 acre area. The 1990 General Plan noted this area as North Alberhill Ranch identifying this area for a subsequent SP addressing post mining, reclamation and urban land uses. Subsequently, The Alberhill Ranch North SP was submitted to the City but never approved. The land uses proposed in the Alberhill Ranch North SP were general commercial, open space and Walker Canyon Road extension. The 2007 General Plan recognizes the historical mining and existing vested mining permit for the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan MCA North Alberhill Ranch area and proposes a mining zoning overlay for the 86 acre MCA property with an ultimate land use SP designation for post mining reclamation for freeway oriented general commercial, light industrial, high density 1 residential and open space. The 86 acres urban land use plan (SP) should provide for the extension of Walker Canyon Road through the MCA property. MCA owns 60 acres adjacent to the 86 acres in unincorporated County territory. The 60 acres has an existing County mining permit No. 173 dated January 12, 1994. This adjacent 60 acre MCA unincorporated property in the 2007 General Plan will have a mining pre- zoning overlay with a future SP designation for an extension of the urban land uses noted for the adjacent 86 acres. This 60 acre area should be annexed to the City of Lake Elsinore. " I trust this above noted language we discussed on the phone responds to our mutual understanding. I am also enclosing, per your telephone request, the Alberhill Ranch SP Land Use map depicting this MCA 86 acre area and my previous land use request letter. Respectfully submitted, eardy Metrozier, AICP CC: City Council Planning Commission GPAC MCA i] The Planning Associates Jonathan Petke, Inc. Hardy M. Strozier, Inc. 3151 AIRWAY AVENUE, SUITE R -1 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 TELEPHONE: (714)556 -5200 TELECOPIER: (714)556 -3905 E -Mail: HardyEsq @aol.com E -Mail: PlanningAssoc(a)aol.com November 17, 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention: Planning Commission and City Council Re: General Plan Update MCA Ownerships Honorable Planning Commission and City Council: On behalf of MCA, a major clay roofing tile production company and property owner in the City, we would like to comment on the proposed General Plan update. Our first property located in the City is located on 86 acres just south of Lake Street and I -15 freeway. The second property is 60 acres and located in an unincorporated area adjacent to the 86 acres: The MCA property, totalling146 acres, is accessed at the south end of Walker Canyon Road. The 86 acre portion of the property and its zoning is part of the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan 89-2 (ARSP) and was part of the 2;667 acre annexation in 1989. All of our 146 acre property is part of an existing vested mining permit that covers a much larger area and the property has extensive proven clay deposits. We are currently preparing a mining reclamation plan for the 86 acre area currently within the City which will be submitted to the City within the next 90 days for a Reclamation Plan processing. We have reviewed the current General Plan designations and Zoning Map designations and we offer the following recommendations for your consideration: The existing General Plan denotes the 86 acres in the City as "North Alberhill Specific Plan ". The land use plan within the adopted ARSP is Specific Plan Area (SPA) without adopting any particular land use at this time but noting for the 86 acres that "Ultimate uses within the 686 acres of Specific Plan Area may include any combination of residential, commercial, industrial, mining, open space and agricultural use. Future uses in these areas will be subject to the provisions of Chapter] 7.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Code. " We recommend that the 2005 General Plan update maintain the current designation contained in the adopted ARSP and note the area as SPA as currently noted in the existing General Plan including the language noted above from the adopted ARSP. 2. The existing Zoning for the 86 acres is freeway business according to the City's zoning map. We believe the subject 86 acres was incorrectly designated, a scrivener's error, and 1 deviates from the adopted ARSP "zoning" and should revert to the stipulated mixed use categories, SPA, adopted as part of the ARSP. The SPA designation as currently adopted through the ARSP, allows mining (reclamation) and other urban land uses that would be detailed later post Reclamation through a SPA amendment process. It is contemplated by MCA when the mining/reclamation plan is completed, that a more urban mixed land use program is possible including residential, industrial, office and open space. We recommend the General Plan so indicate the noted language consistent with the ARSP_ The zoning should designate the area as SPA and a subsequent Specific Plan Amendment will particularize the "mixed" uses during or after the reclamation process consistent with the adopted ARSP. MCA also owns 60 acres adjacent to and east of the aforementioned 86 acres. This property is currently within the County. MCA requests that this property be included in the City's General Plan with a similar General Plan and Pre- Zoning designation to the MCA 86 acres as contained in the ARSP. We would also look forward to participating with the City on a future annexation of this 60 acres and master planning the entire 146 acres sometime in the near future. We believe the existing ARSP has produced some positive land planning with the current Murdock Specific Plan development on Lake Street. We believe the Specific Plan process should be maintained. We have attached an exhibit noting both MCA ownerships Very truly yoursW✓ /��� Cali, ardy M. Strozier, AICP For Yoshi Suzuki, President MCA Attachment N CITY OF inn L_ AIDE oLSIR I,E ` DREAM EXTREME Tim and Denise Fleming 17970 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation Country Club Heights District Plan Map and APN 375 - 342 -020 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Fleming: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the land use proposed designations of Country Club Heights properties, specifically APN 375 - 342 -020. The Preferred Land Use Alternative Map designates this property as Low Density Residential. Although this is contrary to the Neighborhood Commercial Use that you are desirous of, staff believes that given the size and fragmentation of existing lots and in order to avoid a "spot zoning" situation as well as the size and fragmentation of lots, a residential land use is appropriate. Although, staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, you can present your request to the Planning Commission at the first Public Hearing concerning the General Plan Update, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanzp_Lake- Elsinore oro. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W WLAKE- ELS1NORE.ORG January 23, 2008 ATTN: Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development, City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 674 -3124 FR: Tim Et Denise Fleming 17970 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 245 -7692 RE: Draft, City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, EIR comments Dear Mr. Preisendanz, JAN 2 3 2007 !J B Y� --------- - - - - -- We wish to address oversights of "existing" C -1 designations within the Country Club Heights District Plan maps and land use designations. There are numerous C -1 Zone designations that are not reflected on map Figure CCH -1 ( District Plans) and are shown on the Preferred General Plan Land Use Maps, Exhibit 2 -A area 3134, Exhibit 2 -B and Exhibit 2 -C. Of particular concern is parcel #375 - 342 -020 -4 zoned C -1. .Our concerns are for the accuracy of this very important document to reflect the legal, existing land use designations to be carried over into the updated General Plan. Respectfully, To Tim Fleming Denise Fleming CITY OF ^ LADELSIROIZE = DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Don Summers Realty Center Inc. 30713 Riverside Drive Suite 101 Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property known as APN 377 - 380 -015. Dear Don: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject parcel and our recent meeting regarding the same. As indicated in the letter you sent dated January 22, 2008, staff confirmed that the property identified as APN 377- 380 -015 is proposed as Low Density Residential under the Draft Preferred -Land Use Plan. Although staff understands the logic of your request, as 1_ indicated to you in our meeting, the City Council had directed Staff as a result of discussions relative to the Third Street Annexation that these parcels and others in the area would remain Low Density Residential, whereby ultimately allowing the continuation of the uses presently enjoyed by the property owners in the area. Albeit, although staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, I would recommend that you and /or the property owner address the Planning Commission with your request at the first Public Hearing, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (cDLake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET TAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG REALTY CENTER INC. 30713 RIVERSIDE DR., SUITE 101 • LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530-(951)674-6814- FAX (951) 674 -0162 January 22, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Attention — Rolfe Presisendenz, Regarding — APN 377 - 380 -015 Dear Mr. Presisendenz, Community Development Director Don Summers and I represent a small group who owns the above parcel. We note the Preferred Plan has the parcel designated as `low density residential. We would like to ask you to consider continuing the `commercial designation' easterly to Third Street or buffering the `commercial' designation with "high' or `medium' resdidential easterly to Third Sheet. Trust we appreciate your time and consideration in this request and thank you. Sincerely, Everett Manfredi, Owner Cc /file CITY OF 42 . -. LAI-E 02 LSI E -emu DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Don Summers Realty Center Inc. 30713 Riverside Drive Suite 101 Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property known as APN 377- 090 -012. Dear Don: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject parcel and our recent meeting regarding the same. As indicated in the letter you sent dated January 22, 2008, staff confirmed that the property identified as APN 377- 090 -012 is proposed on the Preferred Alternative as Commercial Mixed Use and not High Density. Please note that the Commercial Mixed Use designation will allow for residential uses in conjunction with commercial retail venues. I would also inform you that staff is anticipating our first Planning Commission Public Hearing, on April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz . Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG // REALTY CENTER INC. 30713 RIVERSIDE DR., SUITE 101 • LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 • (951) 674 -6814 • FAX (951) 674 -0162 January 22, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Attention — Rolfe Presisendenz, Community Development Director Regarding — APN 377 - 090 -012 Dear Mr. Presisendenz, Don Summers and I represent the property owner of the above parcel. This land has been zoned `High Density Residential' with a strong possibility of `Mixed Use' for some time now. The property owner would like to keep the designation `High Density Residential' as listed in the Preferred Plan and not the Business Professional' or `Low Density Residential' as called for in Plan 2 and 3. Trust we appreciate your time and consideration in this request and thank you. Sincerely, Everett Manfredi, Owner Cc /file CITY OF LAKE� LSI� iZE DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Don Summers Realty Center Inc. 30713 Riverside Drive Suite 101 Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the 140 acres on the east side of Interstate 15, between Main Street and Franklin Street. Dear Don: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties and our recent meeting regarding the same. As indicated in the letter you sent dated January 22, 2008, staff confirmed that the properties identified under the 140 aces, shown the exhibit attached to your letter, are Hillside Residential as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. Staff values your request to change the designation of the subject property and would remind you that Alternative 2 (The High Density Alternative) depicts this property as Medium Density with a small portion as Commercial Mixed Use. Although, staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, I would recommend that you and /or the property owner address the Planning Commission with your request to incorporate the Land Use shown on Alternative 2 at the first Public Hearing, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -E LSI NORE.ORG REALTY CENTER,NC. ® MSS. 30713 RIVERSIDE DR., SUITE 101 • LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 • (951) 674 -6814 • FAX (951) 674 -0162 January 22, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Attention — Rolfe Presisendenz, Community Development Director Regarding —140 acres m/1 between Main Street and Franklin Street Dear Mr. Presisendenz, Don Summers and I have been working on the assemblage of the above property for about 15 years. In 2004 and 2005 the City Manager's office, Staff, City Consultants and the Property Owners held regularly scheduled study sessions for the formation of a Community Facilities District for purposes of issuing bonds to fund public improvement costs applicable to the Developer's subdivision(s) located within the boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore (City), the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (School District) and the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). One of the many goals in this effort was the extension of the frontage road, Camino del Norte from Franklin to Main Street. This effort required the cooperation of the Developers as well as the individual Property Owners (Owners). During these study sessions with Staff and Consultants, it was determined the value of the Owner's land would need to be based on land uses and densities that would support the bonding capacity of the proposed CID. It was the opinion of City Management, Staff and Consultants the land would need to be designated Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and possibly Office Professional. Over the past 2 years the General Plan Advisory Committee has placed this valuable "freeway frontage" property into what appears to be `Hillside Residential' or `Very Low Density Residential' on the Preferred Plan and the Alternative Plan 3. These designations will not support a CFD or the huge costs for infrastructures and facilities if constructed by a developer. In view of these issues, we recommend the designations of Commercial and Medium Density Residential on the Alternative `High Density' Plan 2 be incorporated into the `Preferred Plan'. We also recommend some High Density Residential be designated to insure proper land values be in place in order to support the future of the CFD and development objectives. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration Sincerely, Realty Center, Inc. P- verett Mantredr, Owner Cc /file CITY OF LADE LSIO P E EXTREME April 4, 2008 Gary Washburn 905 West Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified as APN 347 - 250 -002, 377 - 110 -001 & 010. Dear Gary: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties. After thorough investigation of the various land uses and topography, staff has concluded the following relative to the parcels owned by Wayne Schell. Assessor Parcel Number 377 - 110 -010 Although you have requested that this parcel be changed to "Limited Industrial', similar to M -1, staff believes that the proposed designation of `Business Professional' as shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan provides a more professional and less intensive land use which will augment, as well as enhance the Commercial Mixed Use within the Dexter /Cambern Area. Additionally, the Preferred Land Use will extend the proposed 'Business Professional' area located along Interstate 15, south of Dexter Avenue. Assessor Parcel Number 377 -110 -001 While you have requested that this parcel divided into a "split' designation of High Density Residential or R -3 (as requested) and "Limited Industrial' or M -1 (as requested), staff believes that the topography of the area you requested for High Density is too severe for that density range. Staff remains committed to the Medium Density as depicted on the Preferred Land Use Plan. Secondly, the M -1 land use requested along 2nd Street, although consistent with the industrial type uses that currently exist, the M -1 or Limited Industrial land use is not congruent with the long term vision for that area which will primarily foster the Commercial Mixed Use theme. 951 b74.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W WAAKE -ELSI NORLORG Land Use Response Letter Gary Washburn April 4, 2008 Assessor Parcel Number 377 -110 -001 Currently, because of the topography and the desire to maintain residentially oriented hillside areas within the City, staff continues to believe that the most appropriate land use for this APN is Hillside Residential as opposed to the High Density or R -3 (As requested) and Limited Industrial' or M -1 (as also requested). However, I would make you aware that the relatively flat area within this APN has been depicted as Medium Density on Alternative 2 and may be more palatable, because of grade. Ultimately, it is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Public Hearing on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center- 183 N. Main Street Lake Elsinore California and make your request known. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz ()Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development General Plan Hearing Date: 1/ 10 /08 Owner: Wayne Schell Parcels : Four Parcels located Dexter & 2 nd Requesting General Plan Classifications: I- Parcels along 2nd Street (West side of Wasson Creek) — Industrial or High Density Residential 2. Parcels south of Wasson Creek High Density Resid. Thank you. Gav`J UUc+fi` 6uv-n. CITY OF^ LADE LSI� NOIUE DREAM EXTREME April 4, 2008 Gary Washburn 905 West Lakeshore Lake Elsinore CA 92530 7 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified as APNs 377 -090 -002 & 004. Dear Gary: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties. You indicated in your letter, a request to change the subject properties from Commercial Mixed Use as shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan to either High Density Residential or Limited Industrial. Currently staff believes and has indication that this area would be better suited as a Commercial Mixed use venue with the ability to include a residential component. Albeit, staff would turn your attention to either Alternative 1 which has analyzed a Medium Density Residential land use or Alternative 2 which analyzed an Industrial designation and make your request to the Planning Commission at the Public Hearing in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(§DLake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W. LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG General Plan Hearing Date: 1 / 10 /08 Owner: Washburn, Gary Parcels : Two parcels on Cambern Ave Requesting General Plan Classifications : L Request classification of Industrial or High Density Residential. Thank you. D-2UVL- CITY OF LADE LLSI� OIZE %� DREAM EJCTREME Gary Washburn 905 West Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN 379 -131 -019. Dear Gary: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. Although you have requested High Density Residential for this property, it has been staffs intent to maintain this as a General Commercial area, which will potentially provide services in the future to the surrounding residential communities. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Public Hearing on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center- 183 N. Main Street Lake Elsinore California and make your request known. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzP-Lake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W. LA K E- E LS I N O R E.O RG General Plan Hearing Date: 1 / 10 /08 Owner: Charles Pearce Parcels : Four Parcels fronting Joy Street Requesting General Plan Classifications : 1. Request classification of High Density Residential. Thank you. G) a�y Ash��U� NNUTOROVE P A R T M E N March 8, 2006 TO: Ross Presendanz Director of Community Development Dept City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention: Ross Presendanz RE: OurLetter dated 12/7/2005 on General Plan Updatee ( Copy Attached) Dear Sir We have had no feed back on our letter sent on 12/7/05 nor have we received notice of any public meetings regarding General Plan Update and just want to check to make sure there is nothing we should be doing at this time to see if higher density (24 units per acre) could be granted for our property as discussed in our referenced letter. Would you have your office notify us when the next public meeting will be held and is there anything else we should be doing at this time to gain higher desired density Thank you for your consideration on this matter Sin erely , Chuck & Patricia Pearson 16460 Joy Street • Lake Elsinore, California 92586 • (909) 674 -3700 Memorandum To: Tom Weiner From: Gary Washburn Date: 2/27 /2007 Re: General Plan Classification of Joy Street Parcels Tom, please find letters, maps and a recent image of the property m question. Mr. Pearson and I feel that a commercial classifieation is a wrong general plan classification. The better land use for these parcels would be residential due to the fact that commercial uses currently exist at the comer of Joy & Riverside Dr. The car wash and office complex restrict both the visibility and access to Mr. Pearson's parcels fronting Joy Street I feel that a higher density residential, inuch like currently exists, should be considered to fill in between the existing residential and car wash commercial use. If you need any thing else then please call me. Gary CITY OF /i/`n LADE LSI� ICE DREAM EXTREME April 8, 2008 / Carl Winkle 840 N. Glendora Avenue Glendora CA 91741 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation, particularly the property known as La Laguna Heights Specific Plan, which includes APNs 391 -181- 013, 391- 183 -002, 007 located within the City Limits. Dear Mr. Winkle: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you. indicated in your letter, the property identified above was a part of an Annexation which was never completed and a Specific Plan that was approved by the City of Lake Elsinore on May 10, 1994. Since the Public Review Period of the Draft environmental Impact Report, staff thoroughly analyzed and researched the question of the entitlement for the La Laguna Heights Specific Plan. Although staff currently believes that the Assessor Parcel Numbers 'under the Specific Plan that within the City would be more appropriately designated as Open Space or at least Hillside Residential, staff will include a land use recommendation in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission that the City must honor the original approval and the validity of the approved Specific Plan. As such and with the concurrence of the Planning Commission, Staff will change the designation of the properties within the entire Specific Plan area as dark grey or Approved Specific Plan prior to the next Hearing. Your letter of January 23, 2007 and this letter will be included in the Staff Report to Commission as an attachment. Staff would recommend that you reaffirm your request to the Planning Commission at the 1St Planning Commission Public Hearing located in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(r�Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development, 951.674.3124 1305. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 wW W. LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG Carl Winkle 840 N. Glendora Ave. Glendora, CA 91741 January 23, 2007 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Community Development Director Community Development Department City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Jill\ 1 b 1-:108 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE P1 r ," 7'1(' DIVISION SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN Dear Mr. Preisendanz: This letter respectfully requests that the City revise the "Preferred Land Use Plan" (Figure 2.1a) contained in its General Plan Update document to correct a land use designation and mapping error that was made for property I own in the City of Lake Elsinore. I own several acres in the Laguna Heights Specific Plan area that is within the City of Lake Elsinore Corporate Boundaries. Please refer to Attachment 1, which locates my property. The "Preferred Land Use Plan (Figure 2.1a) of the General Plan Update document designates my property as "Open Space ". Please refer to Attachment 2. The Laguna Heights Specific Plan, which was approved by the City in 1994, designates my property for Hillside Cluster Homes (SFH -1), View Lots -5,500 SF (SFD -3), and Open Space (OS). Please refer to Attachment 3 which provides the approved Land Use Map. Attachment 4 is Ordinance No. 978, which officially approved the Laguna Heights Specific Plan in May 1994. I hope this Ordinance provides sufficient proof that the Laguna Heights Specific Plan and my property's residential land use designations were officially approved. Attachment 5 is the Conditions of Approval for the Specific Plan. Our review found there are no Conditions of Approval that affected the approved residential land use designations established for my property. I submitted a letter to Mr. Tom Weiner, Planning Manager, on October 23, 2007 regarding the General Plan Update's mapping error. In addition, I recently met with Mr. Weiner, Mr. Kirt Coury, and Ms. Alisha Santana on January 15, 2008 to further discuss this issue. At this last meeting, both Mr. Weiner and Ms. Santana were in agreement that Ordinance No. 978 provided sufficient proof that the Laguna. Heights Specific Plan was officially approved by the City in 1994 and that those land uses designated for !2!y properties within the Laguna Heights Specific Plan (which include my property), would continue to be forwarded with the General Plan Update. I again, request that the "Preferred Land Use Plan" (Figure 2.1a) contained in the General Plan Update document be revised to reflect the SFH -1 and SFD -3 residential land use designations for my property rather than Open Space. Please email the Preferred Land Use Plan (Figure 2.1a) after it is revised to reflect the SFH -1 and SFD -3 residential land use designations to w_inklec msn.com. Please also contact me at (626) 274 -9452 if you have any questions or, require anything else. Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Page 2 January 23, 2007 I would also like to thank your staff, especially Mr. Tom Weiner, Ms. Alisha Santana, Mr. Kirt Coury, and Mr. Joe Bitterolf. Each has been accessible, helpful, and reasonable in working with me and my consultants in resolving this matter. Sincerely, Carl Winkle 840 N. Glendora Ave. Glendora, CA 91741 CC: Tom Weiner, Planning Manager Alisha Santana, Deputy City Attorney Kirt Coury, Planning S=O i,17 LADE L LSII`IORE "c \_u DREAM EXTREME 0 - 'IS /1: Alex Ghahremania 26111 Ravenna Road Mission Viejo CA 92692 la Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN: 379 -111 -014. Dear Mr. Ghahremania: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicated in your letter, the property identified as APN 379 -111- 014 is designated General Commercial on the Preferred Land Use Map. Although staff understands your interest and the reasons for a designation of Commercial Mixed Use, staff believes, after extensive review, that the Commercial designation is more appropriate, considering the nexus to SR 74 and the other commercial venues in the area. Albeit, Staff would recommend that you make your request known to the Planning Commission at the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing located in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz @Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG 11 Od Attn: Rolfe Preitsenaanz 3e: General Plan Update General flan Zoning Designation Property on the comer of Riverside Drive and Lincoln SUM .APN #-.379 -111 -014 It is our request that the Planning Department and the Planning Commission reconsider the Zoning designation of the Property (APW 379=111 -014) at the corner of Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street The current Zoning in the General Plan update of this site is Commercial. We are requesting The Planning Department to consider a Designation allowing a Mixed Use Project incorporation an Affordable Housing Element or a High or Medium Density Housing designation also incorporation an Affordable Housing Element We feel ruiner of these options would be consistent with the seven mandatory goals of General Plan Update and it VisiM Ibr the Cities Development . We are currently establishing communications with the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency to determine what direction they feel would best serve ft City and Neighborhood. We have had meetings with the City Planning Staff to investigate the viability of changing the parcels zoning to either a medium density or high density housing designation. They felt it would be more acceptable to the Planning Commission if it maintained some commercial element, although it could incorporate a residential element as well. In furdwdisorrssions the idea of an inelusionarytype project, with an affordable housing element could be considered. This is the approach we are pursuing. with the Redevelopment Agency. The goal of the City is to grow in an orderly; Planned, and at controlled rate. Riverside drive is struggling to occupy all the commercial space currently available. It does not need a large addition of vacant commercial space. The character and commercial appearance (although at a community or residential scale) of Riverside Drive would be maintained and development could occur sooner rather than later to give the area a boost and improved appearance. The action we are ;requesting is that the Planning Staff and Planning Commission redesignate the proposed zoning from Commercial to a designation that allows Inclusionary High Density Housing or Mixed-Use with an Inchrsiotrmry Housing Element. The property owner and I want to complement the Planning Staff that has met with us reeardine these issues, and look forward to contiimina working with there in the future . i/L- ,r, I /10/0 CITY OF i ^n LADE IUD,) LSIROKE DREAM EXTREME Bart Pebbles Caliber Elsinore LLC 4590 MacArthur Blvd. Suite 550 Newport Beach CA 92660 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 377 - 030 -015 & 076 and 377- 090 -009 Dear Bart: This letter shall confirm that subject properties, as you had requested in your letter dated August 10, 2006, have been designated on the Draft Preferred Alternative as General Commercial. This letter, as well as the afore mentioned letter dated August 10, 2006 have been included in the Staff Report as an attachment. Please be advised that the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing for the General Plan update will be held on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center —183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a )Lake- Elsinore orcg. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG RETAIL PROPERTIES GROUP Long te'm visa. Relationship dnvm. CALIBER ELSINORE LLC 4590 MacArthur Blvd. Suite 550 Newport Beach, CA 92660 August 10, 2006 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 E. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: The Shoppes at Central Crossroads SEC Central & Cambern, Lake Elsinore, CA APN #'s 377-030-076,377-030-015,377-090-009 Dear Rolfe: As per my letter addressed to you on June 15, 2006, after several months of exploring mixed -use concepts, we have opted to continue on our original course as a traditional Commercial, Office, and Retail Center. A center consistent with those uses contained in our zoning designation of C2 and existing Conditions of Approval. We may phase this center, based upon pre - leasing results and economic conditions. Our overall findings in assessing the residential market, is that given the significant softening of residential overall, we will have less market risk in developing the property as a commercial center. (A rough concept of our plan is attached). However, in review of the proposed General Plan, we are interpreting that a portion of our property is proposed to be modified toward mixed use or residential (it's kind of hard to read). If this is true, we would have a problem and be opposed with that plan, as the marketplace is telling us we are better to develop the property as commercial, and we purchased the property given the assumptions that were made based upon the commercial zoning and Conditions of Approval. We would look forward in meeting with you at your earliest convenience to confirm our Present understanding and to provide you with an update as to our status. Thank you. Kindest Re ands Bart D. e bles Caliber Retail Properties Group 949.725.0103 Cc: Ms. Sandra Massa -Lavitt Mr. Jeff Armour, Mr. David Lee, members, Caliber Elsinore LLC 4590 Macgrthut Boulevm0, Suite 550 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel 949.7250303 Fax 94W25 362 Email in(o@Calibe6tetW1l .y,eT9es.com Web CaliberttetejP,.N,fles.com CITY OF LAKE L LSI MORE DREAM ' Erik Lunde 240 Newport Center Drive Suite 220 Newport Beach CA 92660 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as Spyglass Specific Plan, Dear Erik: This letter shall confirm that although the Preferred Land Use Plan does not currently reflect the approved Spyglass Specific Plan, staff has included a recommendation to the Planning Commission within the Staff Report which reaffirms your recent City Council approval and commitment to recognize this project. This letter, as well as the letter dated April 24, 2006 has also been included in the Staff Report as an attachment. Please be advised that the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing for the General Plan update will be held on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center —183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (a)Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG April 24, 2006 General Plan Advisory Committee City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: REQUEST TO MODIFY THE CITY'S DRAFT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE SPYGLASS RANCH PROPERTY Dear Committee Members: Spyglass Ranch, LLC respectfully requests that the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) revise the draft General Plan land use designations for the Spyglass Ranch property from "Hillside Residential and General Commercial' to "Low - Medium Density Residential' and maintain the "Future Specific Plan" overlay for the reasons outlined below and the accompanying enclosure. Please include this letter and its enclosures in the administrative record of the GPAC's proceedings with respect to the General Plan Update. The Property: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 377 - 250 -011; 377 - 350 -004, 007, 008, 010, 014, 015, 016, 017; and 377 - 260 -005, 006 (approximately 259.8 acres of generally undeveloped land, east of Interstate 15 at the intersection of Main Street and Camino del Norte) and currently subject to a development application as Specific Plan No. 2005 -02, General Plan Amendment No. 2005 -06, and Change of Zone No. 2005 -07 (see Exhibit 1, Vicinity Map and Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo). 2. Adopted General Plan Land Use Designation: Future Specific Plan, Neighborhood Commercial, and Freeway Business (see Exhibit 3, Adopted General Plan Land Use Designations). 3. Current Zoning: Single Family Residential (R -1) and General Commercial (C -2) (see Exhibit 4, Current Zoning Map). 4. Draft General Plan Update Land Use Designation: Hillside Residential and General Commercial (see Exhibit 5, Draft General Plan Land Use Designation). 5. Requested General Plan Land Use Designation: Low - Medium Density Residential (3.5 -4.0 du/ac) and maintain the Future Specific Plan overlay (see Exhibit 6, Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation). Spyglass Ranch, LLC is the owner of 11 parcels of land consisting of approximately 259.8 acres located east of Interstate 15 at the intersection of Main Street and Camino del Norte. Spyglass Ranch, LLC has been processing concurrent applications for a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Specific Plan. Spyglass Ranch, LLC originally submitted the applications in June of 2005 and received confirmation that the applications were "deemed complete" by all departments. The applications currently on file are consistent with the adopted "Future Specific Plan" designation and "Single Family Residential" (R -1) zoning for the majority of the property. The preparation of a Specific Plan for the property will allow for coordinated development, similar to approved master General Plan Advisory Committee RE: Spyglass Ranch General Plan Update Designation April 24, 2006 planned communities in the vicinity of this site (Tuscany Hills Specific Plan, Ramsgate Specific Plan, etc.). The Draft General Plan update designates the Property as "Hillside Residential and General Commercial'. However, we believe that the requested "Low Medium Density Residential" land use designation is more appropriate for the Property for the reasons set forth below. • Higher density residential land use designations would allow for the implementation of required infrastructure improvements in the Camino del Norte Planning District. Development of the Camino del Norte Planning District (see Exhibit 7, Camino del Norte Planning District) would provide a required north/south and east/west corridor between Main Street and proposed/existing development to the north and east (see Exhibit 8, Caminio del Norte District — Required Circulation Improvements). The City of Lake Elsinore has recognized these longstanding issues and has worked with property owners over the past two years on a Traffic Study for the Camino del Norte Planning District. The proposed residential densities in the Camino del Norte District will provide for the improvement costs associated with the build out of these corridors, thereby alleviating traffic impacts in the eastern portion of the City. Additionally, numerous approved projects cannot move forward without the implementation of these required infrastructure improvements. • Implementation of the City's goals in the Camino del Norte Planning District would be considerably easier now that there is consolidated ownership of the area. Previously, ownership of the parcels in the area was highly fragmented among numerous owners. Currently, three major land owners own the remaining non- entitled parcels in the Camino del Norte Planning District (see Exhibit 9, Camino del Norte Planning District — Consolidated Ownership). With consolidated ownership, required infrastructure improvements would be resolved and implemented in a coordinated and timely manner through the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD). • Development of the Property would provide the needed rooftops to support redevelopment of downtown and economic growth of the City, while meeting the demand of an urbanizing locale. The Property is adjacent to Main Street and would generate an increase demand for commercial development, helping to induce commercial growth and redevelopment in downtown Lake Elsinore and throughout the City. The City of Lake Elsinore was initially hesitant to participate in the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) due to the conservation area set aside within City limits and the loss of future housing stock. Development of the Camino del Norte Planning District will help offset this loss and the City's ability to meet current and future housing demands. • Specific Plan entitlement will ensure adequate control by the City over the design of the Project. A Specific Plan will provide for planned development of the site that is sensitive to existing constraints, focusing on the preservation of hillsides and view corridors along Camino Del Norte. Spyglass Ranch, LLC is committed to working with City staff to ensure that these goals are achieved for the site. A Specific Plan would allow for the development of various dwelling types to address General Plan Advisory Committee RE: Spyglass Ranch General Plan Update Designation April 24, 2006 different market segment, while providing for detailed design criteria and development standards to create an aesthetically pleasing master planned community. The Project Area has been considered the "Missing Link" by the City because of its importance to the Camino del Norte Planning District. Development of the Spyglass Ranch property and adjacent projects is critical to the required infrastructure improvements in the Camino del Norte Planning District. Without these improvements, the urbanizing northern and eastern portion of the City will remain disjointed from the downtown core (see Exhibit 10, The Missing Link). Additionally, the timing and funding of development for the existing and proposed projects in the Camino del Norte Planning District will be delayed considerably. For these reasons and the exhibits provided in the enclosure, Spyglass Ranch, LLC respectfully requests GPAC to revise the recommended land use designations for the Property. Sincerely, Erik Lunde Spyglass Ranch, LLC Cc: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development Robert Brady, City Manager Enclosures: Exhibit 1, Vicinity Map Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo Exhibit 3, Adopted General Plan Land Use Designation Exhibit 4, Current Zoning Map Exhibit 5, Draft General Plan Land Use Designation Exhibit 6, Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation Exhibit 7, Camino Del Norte Planning District Exhibit 8, Camino del Norte Planning District— Required Circulation Improvements Exhibit 9, Camino del Norte Planning District — Consolidated Ownership Exhibit 10, The Missing Link CITY OF ins LADE 5LSIR0PE DREAM EXTREME o- John H. Johnson CJ Consulting 17837 Brightman Avenue Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 13 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN: 349 -400 -034. Dear John: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicated in your letter the property identified as APN 349 -400- 034 was designated Hillside Residential on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. As we discussed this land use was maintained since the Annexation Pfe -Zoned it as such. Since your request, Staff has determined that a commercial land use is reasonable, since it fronts SR 74 and the property is virtually flat. I would recommend that you and or the property attend the Planning Commission and make your request known. I would also recommend that you request a Neighborhood Commercial designation in order to provide local retail services to the surrounding residential communities. Please note that the General Plan Update has been duly noticed for the 15f Planning Commission Public Hearing in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center 133 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz@Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 WWW.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG CJ Consuffing October 12, 2007 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, Ca. 92530 Attn: Sandra Massa -lavitt RE: General Plan Update APN 349 -400 -034 Dear Ms. Massa-lavitt, I am sending this letter on behalf of the property owner to request your consideration for changing the land Use Designation as part of the General Plan Update. The property is part of Annexation 77 and fronts State Highway 74 at Crompton Road in the Meadowbrook area. The property is generally triangular in shape and is approximately 2 acres in size. There is approximately 15 feet difference in elevation sloping downward from east to west. We respecttiilly request the Land Use Designation be of a Commercial type use for the following reasons: 1. The property directly fronts State Highway 74 and is not conducive to residential development due to the increasing traffic and traffic noise. 2. The property is not large enough to make a residential development economically feasible. 3. The property lies directly across the highway from existing commercial uses. 4- The general shape of the property would be more appropriate for a commercial use. 5. State Highway 74 is increasingly becoming more of a commercial corridor. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments. your consideration in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, CMJ tI 1_JI cc: Mohammad Ahnahmud Everett Manfredi- Realty Center 17837 Brightman Ave. Lake Elsinore, Ca. 92530 Tel and Fax 951- 678 -5776 Ll a OF LADE 5LSif10PE DREA '19 : 11: Colin Drukker, Senior Planner The Planning Center 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subject: Letter dated January 14, 2008 Dear Mr. Drukker: I q Thank you for your recent inquiry concerning densities and Specific Plans. As you know, specific plans speak to the densities allowed. It is for that particular reason the General Plan is silent on the density allowed in the project area you are attempting process through the City. In addition, no confusion would exist since any proposed specific plan would be required to be consistent with General Plan designations, unless an application for a General Plan Amendment is applied for and considered by both the Planning Commission and City Council. At this time, the City is not considering establishing maximum density and intensity thresholds for specific plans. The General Plan does contain language where density and intensity levels are calculated, For example, the mixed -use designation identifies the mixture of commercial and residential uses in each of the land use designations. The City has recognized the maximum density of 24 units per acre, which is expressed in the General Plan under the high - density land use designation; density bonus credits are available for the provision of affordable housing units within a specific project and /or by enhanced architectural features, open space, etc. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (aD_Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W LAKE -ELS I NORE.ORG R EZN i D JAN 15 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION January 14, 2008 Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 r� PLANNING CENTER Subject: City of Lake Elsinore Draft General Plan Dear Mr. Preisendanz: Governmental Services Planning & Urban Design Environmental Studies Schaal Facilities Planning 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 vv vvplanningcenter.com On behalf of WatersEdge Elsinore Assoc.,LLC., we would like to offer the following comment on the City's December 2007 Draft General Plan. The Draft General Plan provides a land use designation that applies to areas controlled by an adopted specific plan. The Specific Plan land use designation permits the City to remain flexible in its master planning efforts, releasing the City from forcing developments prepared under a specific plan to conform to other general plan land use designations that are intended for more conventional development patterns. When adopted by ordinance, specific plans serve as the adopted zoning designation for a given area. As a general law city, Lake Elsinore must ensure that such specific plans are consistent with the general plan land use designation. This consistency requirement applies specifically to maximum density and intensity thresholds. The Draft General Plan is currently silent on the maximum density and intensity thresholds for specific plans. In its silence, the City may encounter confusion on the maximum development it is permitted to approve under a specific plan. One could assume that the thresholds default to the highest standard stated for any other general plan land use category— currently 24 to 35 units per acre and 1.0/1.2 FAR. One might also assume that specific plans can adopt any density or intensity threshold. To remedy this situation, we would recommend that the City state specific maximum density and intensity thresholds permitted under any future specific plan. The City should also clarify how the density and intensity levels should be calculated; particularly for cases where a mix of product types and densities might be constructed within one planning area. This could be easily included as a line in Table 2 -1, City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Designation Standards. Such language would provide the public, developers, City staff, and City decision makers with a better understanding of the type and intensity of development envisioned for the future of Lake Elsinore, and would also ensure that future specific plans are not restricted to an unintentionally low threshold. Consistent with the City's vision, we would recommend that the City consider setting the maximum density thresholds for specific plans at 35-40 units per acre to accommodate a wide variety of single and multi - family products appropriate for the lake- oriented setting. QAWAT -01 X\Genere Plan 0,.MGP comment IMWAOc January 14, 2008 Page 2 We recognize that the City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) may not have assumed such densities for the specific plan areas. However, the City can be assured that any potential impacts above those considered in the General Plan EIR would be assessed as part of a specific plan's EIR. We applaud the City on its efforts to update the General Plan and thank you for the opportunity to provide input. We remain available for any questions or further input. Sincerely, THE PLANNING CENTER on behalf of WATERSEDGE ELSINORE ASSOC.,LLC Colin Dru cue Senior Planner 0 0AWAT- 01.0L1GMwal Plan D AGP comment lMu doc CITY OF ins LADE L LSIIi0RE 1 DREA REME Larry Plavala P.O. Box 963 Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 IS Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for property identified as APN 377 - 100 -003 Dear Mr. Plavala: Thank you for your correspondence regarding the proposed land use designation of the subject property. As you mentioned, the property is designated as Medium Density Residential on both the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan as well as the Draft High Density Alternative Land Use Plan. This proposed .designation best serves to provide a transition from the higher density mixed use designations along 3rd Street to lower density designations on 3rd Street beyond Cambern (east). Although staff must proceed with the current Preferred Land Use Map and Medium Density designation, you can present your request to the Planning Commission at the first Public Hearing concerning the General Plan Update, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (c)_Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG July 3, 2007 To: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Dept/ Tom Weiner RE: Annexation and zone change Dear Mr. Tom Weiner, I am one the property owners in the potential 3rd St. Annexation Area. I reside at 29366 3`d St. Lake Elsinore(AP #377 -100 -003), on the comer of Cambem and 3`d St I was recently mailed a map that showed the potential change in zoning upon the completion of the annexation. Currently my parcel is archaically zoned RR w/ the County, and your map shows a change to medium density, a better designation but not best. As a concerned property owner and a licensed real estate broker (20 years locally in the profession), it is my opinion that my 3 -acre parcel should be given "high density". The reasons are as follows: 1. 3rd St. and Cambem have and will continue to experience tremendous increases in traffic flow. This generally has a negative impact on the parcels affected, unless they are commercial. Since my parcel and those across the street are residential, the desirability and marketability of these sites for residences is greatly diminished. Usually this negative impact can be offset by affordability. Amongst other things, affordability is certainly related to the number of units/ acre allowed, thereby bringing the land cost/unit down. 2. Recognizing that high(er) density housing allowances are used in areas as buffer zoning or transitional density blending, conforming with the zone across the street on the SE corner of 3`d and Cambern would be consistent with that logic. 3. Additionally, as a corner parcel, my land will be further adversely developmentally impacted by corner setbacks, street dedication/widening, etc.. Thereby creating a lower actual number of dwelling units per acre, quite possibly effectively lowering to medium density. In effect, this parcel needs high density to maybe achieve medium density, when all constraints /conditions are met. It is inevitable that growth in our valley will continue, and I appreciate the city's attempts over the years to formulate a plan that "makes sense ", for itself and the community it represents. I hope that it can be remembered that both sides should benefit from this annexation Those benefits should go beyond the minimal ones presented in the "services/benefits" letter sent out to the affected property owners. I look forward to working with the city and applying a "win win" philosophy through the process. gawrence APIavala PO Box 963 Lake Elsinore, CA. 92531 CITY OF LADE f LSIHORE V DREAM EXTREME . FWANS N NO MO., Pete Reynen Lakeland Building & Development, Group, Inc. 30833 Golden Gate Drive Canyon Lake, Ca 92587 Ib Subject: Land Use Request Letter concerning properties located on Flint Street, south of Chaney Street APNs 374 - 022 -013, 019 & 022. Dear Mr. Reynen: This is to acknowledge your letter in which you expressed interest in the maximum residential density allowed on property you are associated with located in the vicinity noted above. W& are confirming the land use designation of the area as high density residential conforming to the density you requested in your letter. Please note the public hearing for the Draft General Plan will be held on April 15, 2008, starting at 6:00 p.m. at the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center. We. look forward to your attendance and continued interest in the City of Lake Elsinore. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzcDLake- Elsinore.ora. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG LakeLand Building &Development Group, Inc 30833 Golden Gate Dr. Canyon Lake, Ca. 92587 Dear. Rolf, It was a pleasure to see you again. Thank you for-the insight into the strategy for the development of the Mohr Street Condominiums. The changing tunes within the City of Lake Elsinore during the growth and general plan amendment proceedings has certainly made it very interesting fqr us developers. As we discussed earlier this week, I have listed. below several reasons that I feel that the area along Flint Street, south of Chaney Boulevard would be better served as Ngh Density Residential, 24 to 30 Units per acre. - l¢xiaft Fight Industrial to south aud east. -The existing terrain allows for distant views only, higher density will enable view corridors over the Light Industrial buildings -A high density solution will create a "buffer" of excellent architecture, landscaping to the existing single family homes to the west towards Pottery Avenue. -.The-parcel next to Flint Street is Zoned Commercial APN 374 -022 -019, 374= 022 -022 -The three lots directly behind the commercial lots are zoned RI APN 374- 022 -013 - Preliminary concepts have resulted with a "stepping" of the buildings, nestled into the hillside as much as.possible In summary, I feel that the area along the western portion of Flint Avenue should be rezoned, revised in the upcoming General Plan Amendment to High Density 24 to 30 Units per acre, for the benefit of the City of Lake Elsinore and the immediate neighborhood of Mohr Street and Pottery Avenue. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. I will call you in two weeks if I do not hear from you by then Best Regards, Pete Reynen and Mike Markley Lakeland Development, Gtoup Inc. 30833 Golden Gate Dr. Canyon Lake, Ca 92587' 951.757.6954 951.212.7046 Joseph A. Porras, AIA, NCARB Principal Architect Crates. & Haas Land Development Services; Inc, Architecture Division 25020 Las Brisas Road Murrieta, California 92562 Toil -Free: 866.409.2006 T: 951.461.8806x150 F:951.973.7155 CITY OF LADE Cog LSI� IYOIZE 0 DREAM EXTREME Wayne Gunter 601 Parkview Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 17 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for property identified as APN: 378 -115 -027 Dear Mr. Gunter: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicated in your letter, the property identified currently has a "split" land use designation of both Light Industrial and Residential. The entire parcel is designated as Hillside Residential on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan as Staff has determined that a residential land use for the entire parcel is reasonable, particularly given the subject parcel's undesirable "split" land use designation would be eliminated. We appreciate you bringing this to our attention. Please note that the General Plan Update has been duly noticed for the April 15, 2008 Planning Commission Public Hearing in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center - 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 V✓W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG D MCM2S '?L- 11 JUN 19 2001 BY: -- �- - - - - - -- June 15, 2007 Attention Tom Weiner: Reference: APN 378 - 115 -027 Dear Tom, As per our conversation at our meeting on the 11th of June, we are requesting a land use change for my vacant lot, APN 378 - 115 -027. You had informed me that the lot is currently zoned for '/-, light industrial and 1/2 residential. We would like to request a change to incorporate the subject lot as all residential, please see attached documentation. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincer Wayne Gunter 21 O F LADE L LSIIYOIZE =� DREAM 18 'm : 11: Charles G. Tunstall P.O. Box 546 Wildomar, CA 92596 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for Camino Del Norte area. Dear Charles: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed land use designations along Camino Del Norte. As indicated in the letter you sent dated January 10, 2008, you had inquired about commercial land use along the Camino Del Norte extension. The subject area is identified as Hillside Residential as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. There are limited opportunities for commercial land uses in this area due to existing topography. Residential is proposed as the preferred alternative in order to provide additional residential to support downtown as well as existing and future commercial uses along Highway 74. Staff values your request to consider commercial zoning designations along thins area and would remind you that Alternative 2 (The High Density Alternative) depicts a portion along the Camino Del Norte extension as Neighborhood Commercial and Medium Density Residential. Although, staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, I would recommend that you and /or the property owner address the Planning Commission with your request to incorporate the Land Use shown on Alternative 2 at the first Public Hearing, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG JANUARY 10, 2008 CHARLES G.TUNSTALL P.O. BOX 546 WILDOMAR, CA. 92595 -0546 951 -67 &2612 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 S. MAIN ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA. 92530 951- 674 -3124 RE: CAMINO DEL NORTE EXTENSION WITH COMMERCIAL LAND USE CAMINO DEL NORTE IMPROVEMENTS WILL: HELP LOCAL CITIZENS MOVE THROUGH THERE CITY. ADD TRAFIC TO DOWNTOWN, ALLOW TRAFIC TO BETTER USE MAIN STREET FREEWAY RAMPS. THE CITY SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERSTATE 15. TRAFFIC WILL STOP AND ADD SALES TAX FOR LOCAL USE. SINCERELY, CHARLES G. TUNSTALL CITY OF ins LADE 5 LSIIZE DREAM EXTREME ' Sonia and Sunil Shah 915 W. Las Palmas Drive Fullerton, CA 92835 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for Grand /Macy property Dear Sonia snd Sunil: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicate in the letter, the subject property is designated Commercial Mixed Use as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. Although this is contrary to the Residential Mixed Use that you are desirous of, staff believes that with the progression of other potential mixed use projects in the area, this land use could ultimately allow for the development of both a commercial component and as well as a high density residential component that you desire. As such, Staff believes that the proposed designation (Commercial Mixed Use) as shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan would both accommodate future Commercial developments along this designated urban arterial street (Grand Avenue), as well as allow for the future development of residential projects, satisfying the intent of the proposed Commercial Mixed Use Land Use. Although, staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, you can present your request to the Planning Commission at the first Public Hearing concerning the General Plan Update, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore oro. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W LAKEELSI NORLORG 01/10/2008 14:46 FAX 7146804441 Morelia -place devlopment 0002/002 Sonia Shah bnd Sunil Shah 915 W. Lai Palma Drive Fullerton, dA 92835 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Communityi Development Director City of Lake Elsinore 300 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Mr. P[reisendanz: We write trj response to the attached General Plan Landuse plan that was e- mailed to us We own the two parcels at the comer of Macy Street and Grand Avenue and have met with Mr. Bi`ady, you and several staffmembers over the last two years to discuss the kind of project too City would like to see at this location. Although the front 120 feet of facing Grand on both parcels are zoned commercial and the rest is zoned multifamily residential we were directed to apply for a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment to multifamily or a residential PUD. Therefore, you would understand our surprise when the attached map was send to us. As a City Planner turned developer I believe that the Residential Mixed Use (RMU) designation may work better than a Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). To list a few reasons, thus area is not serviced by a network of City streets. Between the lake and Grand avenue there are cul de sac or looped streets. Grand Avenue is a narrow street with fast mjoving through traffic that serves as a distinct barrier between parcels on either side of the Street. Also, these are long narrow parcels with short street frontage along Grand Avenue. The single family subdivision on Serena Way and Kevin Place would be almost impossible to consolidate into a larger parcel for commercial use However, one of the most problematic aspects of the CMU is the fact that there is little demand for commercial in this area. It would be impossible to get good commercial tenants to locate here. Even the smaller commercial businesses have not fared well in this area and there are large vacant commercially zoned properties that have failed to attract a commercial tenant/developer. If the City wants to see commercial in this area I do believe that the RMU would be appropriate to not only serve the existing residential but also infuse the commercial component to this area. Since we are leaving for a trip abroad we will not be able to attend the meeting today. We will be back on February 4, 2008 and will look forward to further discussion on this matter. Please do not hesitate to call me at 714 470 8734. 11101 O'S ` CITY OF ih� LAKE LSII`IOPE DREAM EXTREME '• 11: Steve Hunter, Vice President Land Design Consultants Inc. 2535 Lunes La Verne, CA 91750 zo Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for properties identified as APN 374 - 061 - 028, 374 - 061 - 029,374- 061 - 015,374- 061 -014 Dear Mr. Hunter: Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the proposed land use designation of the subject properties. Although the properties are designated as Medium Density Residential on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan, the designation found on the Alternative 2 Land Use Map is High Density Residential. Although staff must proceed with the current Preferred Land Use Map and Medium Density designation, you can present your request to the Planning Commission at the first Public Hearing concerning the General Plan Update, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(cDLake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELS INORE.ORG April 2, 2008 (VIA RGULAR MAIL) Mr. Rolfe M. Preisendanz City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: Request for change to proposed Historic District Land Use Map APN Parcels 374- 061- 028 -7; 374 - 061 - 029 - 8;374- 061- 015 - 5;374- 061 -014 -4 Dear Mr. Preisendanz: This letter is to address our opposition to changing our parcels from High density residential to medium density residential as part of the Historic District Land Use Plan Amendment. We our requesting the area located northeasterly of Pottery Street between Langstaff Street and Riley Street remain high density residential. The area (parcels) located adjacent and northerly and southerly of our lots are proposed for high density residential as well as the rest of the parcels located northeasterly of Pottery Street. Several of the parcels located within this block are currently developed with high density residential uses. Also all the undeveloped parcel located along Pottery Street are subject to a 20' wide road dedication further reducing the build able area and reducing the net density. For these parcel to reasonable be developed should remain high density. Based on the above facts we respectfully request these parcels remain high density residential uses and consistent with the proposed high density residential use being proposed on the adjacent parcels. Sincerely, LAND 1} SIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. l�f Steve znter Vice Presidem 2535 Lines LaVerne. CA 91750 626 -578 -7000 Enci.(11 XkPa"e�u,v I\ PLISL \Lnt 'r Cay ofElziru-e:U.:,o.LCc CITY OF LADE L LSIMORT DREAM EXTREME F.-TOPKI 1: Jack R. Reimer Pacific Consultants, Inc 2399 Carlene Circle Corona CA 92882 z1 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN: 363- 090 -008. Dear Mr. Reimer: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. In your letter you requested that the property identified :as APN 363- 090 -008 be changed to R1 -MD. First you should know that R1 -MD is not a designation that the General Plan Update proposes. The Preferred Land Use plan has identified the Land Use on the subject APN as Low Medium Density which would allow 1 to 6 du /ac. With that in mind, staff needs to also advise you that the property is located in Cell No. 4540 and would need to be processed pursuant to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). As such staff could entertain the possibility of clustering the density. Albeit, Staff would recommend that you make your request known to the Planning Commission at the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing located in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on.Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzoLake- Elsinore.orp. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE EISINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG CONSULTANTS, INC. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 6, 2007 Tom Weiner Planning Manager Community Development City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530 Re: General Plan update, 82 acres, APN 363 - 090-08 Dear Tom, RR Ea ri SEP 012UJ? OF LAKE ELSINORE _fISION On behalf of PMC Development Inc, (an affiliate of Pennhill Land Company) I would Re to request in the upcoming General Plan update that the General Plan designation for the above referenced property be modified from its current designation of Rl -LD for 82 acres to 31.5 acres of RI-MD on the western side of the parcel and 50.5 acres of open space -OS, on the eastern portion. Please see the attached diagram for reference. This modification would allow for a potential wildlife corridor linkage between MSHCP cells and best reflects that portion of the property that could be feasibly developed. We also would like to request proviso that if it is determined that the entirety of the 31.5 acres can not be developed due to MSHCP considerations, that the any lost acreage density be transferred to the remaining developable acreage. I thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Reimer 2399 Carlene Circle - Corona, CA 92882 - Tel: (951) 372 -0478 - Fax: (951) 372 -0418 CITY Of LADE LSIIYOIZE �1v DREAM EXTREME April 1, 2008 Christine A. Del Ross - Risher, AICP LAS Associates 1500 Iowa Avenue Suite 200 Riverside CA 92507 22a Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the 20 acres located on the northeastern corner of 3rd Street and Dexter Avenue within the 3`d Street Annexation Area. Dear Ms. Del Ross- Risher, Thank you for your recent support as to the. proposed designation of the subject property as depicted on the Preferred Land Use Plan. We look forward to working with you in the future as you progress towards a successful project. For your information, staff is tentatively looking towards the first Planning Commission Hearing for the General Plan Update on April 15, 2008. A Notice of Public Hearing will be posted ten (10) days prior that date. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELS INORE.ORG L \ /� /�\ I LSA ASSOCIATES, INC- 1500 1SOO IOWA AVENUE. SUITE 200 951.781.9330 TEL RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507 951.781.4277 FAX January 24, 2008 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz, Community Development Director City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Re: Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Comment Dear Mr. Preisendanz: BERKELEY FORT COLLINS CARLSBAD IRVINE COLMA PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND ROCKLIN SAN LUIS OBISPO A `' D JAN 25 2008 CrTy Ol` LAKE NJNG Dflrrcr^.. I am writing this comment letter on behalf of our client, Hillwood Investment Properties (Millwood). As you might recall from our previous meetings with you and other City staff representatives, Millwood has proposed a prominent industrial client's new facility on 20 acres on the northeastern corner of 3'd Street and Dexter Avenue within the 3rd Street Annexation area. The City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan Update preferred land use alternative indicates this site as Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA), at the request of Hillwood, has reviewed the draft land use ordinance for the CMU designation and the allowed land use permitting and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) criteria for this ordinance. The CMU ordinance, the allowed land uses and the land uses allowed with the additional requirements of a CUP indicates enough flexibility within the General Plan Update's land use and zoning to permit Hillwood's proposed industrial facility. Therefore, this letter indicates support of the preferred land use plan alternative proposed for the City's General Plan Up pdate. If you have any questions on this communication, please don't hesitate to contact me at (951) 781- 9310 or by e-mail at Chris .Delrossrisher @lsa- assoc.com. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Christine A. Del Ross - Risher, AICP Senior Planner cc: Ned Sciortino, Hillwood Investment Properties Tom Weiner, Planning Manager, City of Lake Elsinore M412008 (MiLWO702Vake Elsinore comment letter lanuary 24.doc) PLANNING I ENVIRONMENTAL I DESIGN CITY OF LA DE Cog LSI� MORE DREAM EXTREME April 4, 2008 Max Harrison Southwest Land Consultants 31523 Chihuahua Valley Road Warner Springs CA 92086 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN(s) 378 - 030 -011 & 007, 378 - 020 -057, 023, 045, 057 & 059, 278 - 030 -018, 378 -114- 019 - 019,021 -023, 026, 027, 035, 043, 055, 069, 070, 071 -084 Dear Mr. Harrison: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties. Although staff appreciates your consideration and vision as to the area covered by the subject APNs, from the beginning of the General Plan Update process until present, all three (3) alternatives have designated these properties as Limited Industrial and /or Floodway. Since staff cannot make these changes as proposed, it is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request known. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz�_Lake- Elsinore org Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG Southwest Land Consultants 31523 Chihuahua Valley Road - Warner Springs CA 92086 Phone 619 - 922 -0400 — Fax 951- 693 -5818 — Email pac2sh @cox.net Date: January 22, 2008 R(�'(%a REMOVED tl U 'LTV' jf (_,C To: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department JAN 2 T2008 Rolfe Preisendanz 130 S. Main CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Lake Elsinore, , C CA 92530 PLANNING DIVISION From: Max Harrison Southwest Land Consultants c/o Lake Elsinore Association II Re: General Plan Update Business District Community Plan City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department Southwest Land Consultants representing our client, the owners of property in the "Business District" described in the General Plan Update north of Riverside Drive between Baker Street and Collier Avenue, Lake Elsinore Association II write to you in response to the proposed City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update. We understand that considerable time, effort, and resources were committed to the development of this document. We appreciate these efforts from all involved in the process. However, we believe that a few changes could be made that would better develop the area that would both support and enhance the vision of the General Plan's Vision. We believe that two alternatives are immediately apparent and warrant further consideration from the City of Lake Elsinore. First, although we believe the intent of the Business District to be the primary economic region is a rational choice for the City, we believe that the area west of Baker Street and north of Riverside Drive overlooking the Collier Marsh would be an excellent location for a High Density Residential Development. The areas environment would lend itself to the enjoyment of the residents of such a community. The proposed trail system throughout the perimeter of the marsh would be a great resource to those who lived there and would be wasted by a business or professional park. In addition, the property to the west of Baker Street is designated as lower density residential in the General Plan. A high density residential community would serve as a better neighbor than a business park.or light industrial facility. Second, we believe that an alternative alignment for the Pasadena Right of Way should seriously be considered. The current proposed alignment would have significant impact on a sensitive and valuable natural resource. We believe an alternative alignment would preserve the open space and natural environment so prominently discussed within the General Plan's description of the Business District and the Vision called out in the General Plan. We respectfully request that the City of Lake Elsinore consider our opinion and we offer ourselves at any time to discuss this matter in greater detail. We are diligently pursuing the necessary work and coordinating with the neighboring property owners to offer the City a thoughtful and proven alternative to both the business professional land use designation and road alignment. We are currently developing presentation materials and seek further opportunity to present our case to incorporate our vision into the General Plan. We look forward to the possibility of working together with the City to develop the General Plans Vision. We believe that it will both encourage the economic success of the City of Lake Elsinore and enhance the environment and culture of the region. 378030011 ATIA Co 378030007 DSGS Inc / Alexia Smernis Smyrniotis 378020057 Eastern Municipal Water District 378020059 Eastern Municipal Water District 378020023 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 378030018 Good Land Inv 378020045 Good Land Inv IX 378114019 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378030020 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114020 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114021 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114023 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114026 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114035 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114043 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114055 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114069 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114070 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114071 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114072 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114073 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114074 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114075 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114076 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114077 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114078 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114079 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114080 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114081 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114082 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114084 Elsinore Creekside Villa 378114027 Le Chieu Ngoc / Diem Tran Thi 378114022 Peter Shay 378 - 020 -062 -? CITY OF LADE I LSIN RE DREAM EjCT REME April 4, 2008 Rachel D. Schwerin 2635 East Ocean Blvd. Long Beach CA 90803 ay Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified as APNs 347 - 110 -072 and 073 and APNs 347 - 100 -013, 014, 015 & 020. Dear Ms. Schwerin: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties. As you indicated in your letter, the properties identified as APN's 347 - 110 -072 and 073 were designated Hillside Residential on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. Since your request, Staff has determined that a commercial land use is reasonable, since it fronts SR 74 and is adjacent to commercially designated land uses within the North Peak Specific Plan. Although you requested "Highway Tourist Commercial ", the proposed General Commercial land use will accommodate very similar, if not identical opportunities. Please note that the General Plan Update has been duly notice for the 1s1 Planning Commission Public Hearing in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(cDLake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG 03/24/2008 08:46 5624398786 SCHWENN PAGE 02 Rachel D. Schwenn 2635 East Ocean Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90803 Tel: (562) 434 -4220 Fax: (562) 439 -8786 March 24, 2008 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz, VIA Facsimile 951 -471 -1419 Director or Community Development City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE Parcels # 347110 072 and 73 (commonly known as 28365 Hwy 74) and adjacent Parcels # 347 100 013,14,15, 20 Dear Mr. Preisendanz: I am the owner of the above - mentioned six parcels. I recently learned that the City of Lake Elsinore is recommending that their zoning be changed from Highway Commercial to Hillside Residential. This afternoon I met with Ms. Sandra Massa -Lavitt from your office to discuss the proposed change. After describing the location and topography of the land and how it has been utilized over the years, she strongly urged me to contact you in writing ASAP to request that the above - mentioned parcels remain Highway Commercial. As background, my husband and I bought parcels 72 & 73 (26 acres) over thirty years ago, in 1975, as a working squab farm, outfitted with a residence and many outbuildings. A couple of years later we bought the adjacent 9 acres and subsequently split them into 4 parcels (13, 14, 15, 20), though we never proceeded with plans to build on them. In the late 1980s we sold the 9 acres to a company called T'MC, who wanted the acreage as egress to their North Peak development project. In 2002, they returned the parcels to me in the form of a Note and Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. The property has approximately 1500 feet of Highway 74 frontage. Approximately three quarters of the acreage is level. Over the years we have put those acres under cultivation, raising oats for the animals and planting groves of walnut and fruit trees. The back of the acreage has gently rolling hills. The only reason we never cultivated them was because the University of Riverside advised us back in the 70s that the soil was too poor to grow anything commercial. So we just maintained them with 20 -foot firebreaks. I therefore respectfully request that the Department of Community Development reconsider its decision to rezone these parcels Hillside Residential and instead keep them Highway Commercial. The property has lots of flat land that is very compatible for commercial use due to its location along a major thoroughfare and across the street from two large residential developments. Thank you for you time and consideration of my request. l hope to hear from you at your earliest convenience. Sin ly, ;'4 �1 R chef D. Schw CITY OF LADE 9 LSIBOIZE DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Mr. Ronald Slavick Slavick, Boneback & Capiotti 1399 E. Versailles C. Boise, Idaho 83707 is Subject: Proposed General Plan comments relative to Assessor Parcel Numbers: 375 - 091- 003-4; 375 - 091 - 006 -7; 375 - 091 - 005 -6; 375- 091- 007 - 8;375- 100 - 001,003,004,005 ;375- 112 - 001;375- 000 -002; 379 - 207 -003, 006 & 007 Dear Mr. Slavick, Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed land use designations relative to subject Assessor Parcel Numbers. Although staff understands your concerns and preferences as to the proposed land use designations as depicted on the Preferred Land Use Plan, since the beginning of this process it was generally desired to see this area and the area along Lakeshore adjacent to the Lake as a Recreational designation, limited to both passive and active recreational uses (i.e. commercial recreation facilities such as water oriented recreational uses). It is important to note that once the General Plan is adopted, staff will be executing a Consistency Zoning process in which staff will be evaluating the Zoning for each of the hew Land Uses. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at rpreisendanz(a-)lake- elsinore orq. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG 12/03/2007 02:17 4 PAGE 01 January 23, 2008 IRECEIVED JAN 2 3 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION Attention: Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development, City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 From: Ronald Slavick 1399 E. Versailles CC Poise, Idaho 83706 208- 869 -4400 Re: Draft, City of Lake Elsinore General plan, FIR comments Dear Mr. Preiseadanz: I wish to address designations within the Lake Edge District Plan maps and land use designations. ` Our 45 acres on the Northwest corner of the lake is a very desirable location with frontage on Lakeshore Drive and Riverside Drive for major future Recreational and Commercial Development wbich will bene$t the City and Community for years. The conoorn in particular is parcel: # 375 091003 -4, 375 091006 -7, 375 091005 -6, 375 091007 -8, 375 100001 -9, 375 100003 -1, 375 100004 -2, 375 100005 -3, 375112001 -6, 375 000002 -0, 379 207007 -3, 379 207006 -2, 379 207003 -9. Our concerns are for the accuracy of this very important document to reflect the legal, existing land use designations to be carriod over into the updated General flan. Respectfully, Ronald Slavick, Slavick, Bonebrake & Capiotti Please acknowledge with Date, stamp and.fax to 208 -383 -0113 CITY O.F LADE 4-12- LSIRORJE DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Ed Lambert c/o J. J. Swanson Coldwell Banker 23823 Clinton Keith Road Suite 102 Wildomar CA 92595 26 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified as APN 374 - 172 -013 & 014. Dear Mr. Lambert: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject parcels. As you indicated in your letter dated February 18, 2008, staff confirmed that the subject property identified as APN 374 - 172 -013 is proposed a General Commercial under the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. Additionally, staff also confirmed that the.parcel to the north, identified as APN 374 - 172 -014 is being proposed on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan as Medium Density Residential under the same Draft Land Use Plan. As you know, although the intersection of Graham Avenue and Spring Street is purely a Commercial node, the proposed General Plan is attempting to provide additional residential options and opportunities around that node assisting in .creating a self sustaining Downtown, with a mixture of commercial and residential. Albeit, although staff is proceeding with the current Draft Preferred Land Use Map, I would recommend that you and /or your designee attend the Planning Commission hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request. My suggestion is that you consider either the Residential Mixed Use or Commercial Mixed Use land uses for the APN 374- 172-014. 1 believe that these land uses would accommodate both the City's vision and yours. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124. extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (c�Lake- Elsinore.oro. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz - Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG February 18, 2008 Dear Mr. Preisendanz, I am the owner of two parcels located in the city of Lake Elsinore; assessors parcel numbers 374 - 172 -013 and 014. It has come to my attention that lot 014 may change zoning from commercial to medium density residential. If this change occurs it will make it difficult to use lot 013 as commercial considering they are adjacent and are essentially used as one property. Even if the lots were used separately or even sold separately it makes no sense to place residents on a property located between commercial retail and a church. l see no benefit for the City, its residence or myself to propose such a change. At this time I am asking that the appropriate persons investigate this matter before further action is taken. Please feel free to contact my real estate agent for further information or access to the property. EEd LE Property Owner JJ Swanson 951 217 7637 Realtor P.S. You are probably acquainted with this property by its historic name, The Chimes Building. CITY OF LADE ro) LSI E � DREAM EXTREME 417 March 28, 2008 Michael Quirk Elsinore West, LLC 638 Camino De Los Mares Suite H 130 -233 San Clemente CA 92673 Subject: Proposed General Plan comments relative to Assessor Parcel Number 377 - 180 -037. Dear Mr. Quirk, Thank you for your letter dated January 18, 2008 as to the proposed land use designation relative to subject Assessor Parcel Number. Based on our current records the parcel in question is still owned by the Redevelopment Agency. (RDA). Since the negotiations, as you mentioned, have not been completed at this time, staff is required to maintain the Public Institutional designation. Although, Staff understands your concerns and preferences as to the proposed land use designation as depicted on the Preferred Land Use Plan, your request cannot be made at this time. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(a)Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG ELSINORE WEST, LLC 638 Camino De Los Mares, Suite H130 -233 San Clemente, CA 92673 Ph: 949/218 -7908 Fax: 949/498 -0841 w .ELSINOREWESTBUSINESSPARK.com January 18, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Re: Comments regarding Draft General Plan and EIR. Dear Rolfe Preisendanz, On March 13, 2007, our company made an offer to purchase 2.15 acres of land from the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency. The land is located on Minthom Street and the APN is: 377- 180 -037. It is our understanding that our offer is still under consideration by the Redevelopment Agency. Our intent is to develop a project similar to our Elsinore West Business Park (Industrial Design Review 2006- 02) and based around a Limited Industrial land use. The General Plan Update is currently proposing a land use designation of "Public / Institutional" for this parcel. We would like to request a "Limited Industrial" land use for APN 377 - 180 -037 as we feel it is consistent with the proposed surrounding land uses, Please feel free to call or email if you have any questions or concerns Sincerely, Michael Quirk Managing Member, Elsinore West, LLC. Assessor Parcel Number: 377- 180 -037 CITY OF LAVE LSIROIZE -� DREAM March 28, 2008 Michael Quirk Elsinore West, LLC 638 Camino De Los Mares Suite H 130 -233 San Clemente CA 92673 Subject: Proposed General Plan comments Numbers (APN's) 377- 190 -002, 003, 220 -003, 017, 019, 021, 028, & 029. Dear Mr. Quirk, relative to Assessor Parcel 004, 005, 013, & 015; 377- Thank you for your letter dated January 9, 2008 as to the proposed land use designation relative to subject Assessor Parcel Numbers. As you indicated, the proposed General Plan has deleted the "Freeway Business" land use. This change has been initiated in order to simplify the multiple Land Uses currently being utilized. Additionally, although General Commercial is being proposed from the intersection of Central and Collier Avenue to the Wasson Canyon Flood Control Basin, staff believes the subject area of concern is better suited as Limited Industrial, consistent with the surrounding development. Please remember that in past discussions, staff had agreed to accommodate the type of uses you were anticipating on your site at that time. Albeit, it is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008, and make your request. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzpLake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG ELSINORE WEST, LLC 638 Camino De Los Mares, Suite H130 -233 San Clemente, CA 92673 Phi 949/218 -7908 Fax: 949/498 -0841 w - ELSINOREWESTBUSINESSPARK.com January 9, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Re: Comments regarding Draft General Plan and EIR. Dear Rolfe Preisendanz, As you are aware, on April 24, 2006 we made a request to the General Plan Advisory Committee to have select parcels retain their current Land Use Designation of "Freeway Business" through the General Plan Update process. These parcels are located between Collier Avenue and Minthom Street, beginning at the Wasson Canyon Flood Control Basin and ending at the intersection of Collier Avenue and Minthom Street. Due to the positive response from the General Plan Advisory Committee, we feel it is still in the best interest of the City to retain a "Freeway Business" Land Use Designation for these selected parcels. Based upon the draft General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report two separate land uses appear for our selected parcels 1.) Business Professional 2.) Limited Industrial. It appears the Land Use Designation "Freeway Business" has been omitted from the General Plan Update. If this is the case, we would recommend extending the "General Commercial" Land Use Designation north of the Wasson Canyon Flood Control Basin south to the intersection of Collier Avenue and Minthom Street. We believe a "General Commercial" Land Use Designation would closely represent "Freeway Business" when compared to the alternatives. Also, considering the proximity and visibility to Interstate 15 and short distance to Main Street and downtown, commercial related business could possibly thrive in this location Please consider this option for these selected parcels. The Assessor Parcel Numbers are below for your reference. Sincerely, Michael Quirk Managing Member, Elsinore West, LLC. Assessor Parcel Numbers: 377 - 190 -002; 377 - 190 -003; 377- 190 -004; 377 - 190 -005; 377 - 190 -015; 377 - 190 -013; 377- 220 -029; 377 - 220 -017; 377 - 220 -028; 377 - 220 -021; 377 - 220 -019; 377 - 220 -003 CITY OF ins LAKE LSIIYOIZE DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Eugene Gabrych 2006 Hwy 395 Fallbrook CA 92028 zi Subject: Proposed General Plan comments relative to Assessor Parcel Numbers 390 - 110 -007 and 390 - 120 -015. Dear Mr. Gabrych, Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed land use relative to APN's 390 -110 -010 and 015. Asa result, Staff has determined that the subject parcels are located within the approved Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and such will be changed on the Draft Preferred Alternative Land Use Map to dark grey indicating approved Specific Plan (Alberhill Ranch). Please refer to the Specific Plan document for land use direction on your parcels. Also, it is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanzo_Lake- Elsinore oL . Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 `NW W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG Eugene Gabrych 2006 Hwy 395 Fallbrook, CA 92028 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development City of Elsinore January 22, 2008 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA Dear Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz, G EC[0V��� JAN 24'2008 CITY Op �41NORE I am the property owner of approximately 191 acres located on the North / East side of I -15 at the Lake Street exit (Lake Street dead ends into my property). My Riverside County Assessor Parcel Numbers are as follows: 390 -110 -007, 390 - 120 -010, 390 - 120 -012, and 390 -120 -015. In General, I am supportive of the proposed General Plan and look forward to its approval. However, I would like to make a change in the land use designation on the portion of my Property designated as Hillside Residential. I am in agreement with the Commercial land use designation for my two parcels with the Riverside County Assessor Parcel Numbers 390 -120 -010 and 390 -120 -015. However, I would like the proposed land use of "Hillside Residential" on two of my parcels (Riverside County Assessor Parcel Numbers 390 - 110 -007 and 390 - 0120 -015) be changed to either Residential Mixed Use (RMU) or Commercial Mixed Use IC MU). I have outlined some of the advantages below: The Mixed Use designation offers many advantages over the Hillside residential land use for the City, the developer, as well as the Community at large. - It allows more open space since there would be better "clustering" of development. - It allows more, amenities to the City and the Community at large because the development is both Commercial and Residential. In addition, the development is more concentrated thus allowing these amenities (i.e. park -n -ride, etc.) to be more economically feasible to build or set aside than would otherwise be possible. - It offers more job opportunities for the community since there will be the potential for Commercial and Retail land use (and the related jobs) rather than just residential homes under the Hillside Residential land use. - It offers a greater economic base for the City and the Community since there would be the potential for sales tax dollars, bed taxes, jobs, etc. - It is more environmentally friendly because more Commercial will be built which reduces the number of household pets (i.e. cats, etc.) that could harm the surrounding area wildlife. - It allows better noise control since the development would be clustered and better able to manage noise. - It allows for better air quality since the residents would have shorter distances to drive and in many cases, allows them to walk to their destination. - It allows the potential for Green Energy options (i.e. Solar on rooftops of commercial buildings) that simply would not be economically possible under Hillside Residential. - It saves the Community money regarding the extension of Lake Street to connect to future roads to the east. - It offers much great convenience for services to residences since the development would offer a variety of commercial and retail service options that would not be possible under the Hillside Residential land use. Page I of 2 RE: 191 acres on Lake Street owned by Eugene Gabrych. One of the major problems with the Hillside Residential land use is that the low density makes it extremely difficult to financially justify incorporating various community amenities into the project. The few number of homes allowed under Hillside Residential and the amount of grading, utilities, and street improvements necessary to accomplish such small numbers of homes make it difficult to economically incorporate many of the community amenities desired for a project. As such, the Community loses since these amenities will not be built for them to enjoy. I also want to make special mention about the grading issue which, of course, is one of the most important reasons why a typical Hillside Residential land use is usually designated on a property. We are very fortunate to have the type of rock on the property that has the characteristics (hardness, etc.) which make it valuable for use as road base. It is my understanding that it is difficult to find such material in the area. Therefore, the availability of this material as a byproduct of grading the building pads, will offer a valuable resource for much needed road improvements for the City and the surrounding Community. What this means is that not only does this offer a great benefit to the City and the Community, it allows the grading to be done at a very minimal cost. These cost savings will help allow and economically justify the more concentrated development opportunities and amenities that a Mixed Use land use offers. Therefore, the grading issue on this property is not the major cost and problem that would normally be present on most hillside grading projects. In addition, in order to also make the development very aesthetically appealing, we have situated the grading to be done along the Lake Street extension and in between the larger hills. Because of the above mentioned benefits as well as many others, I believe the Mixed Use land use designation for this particular property will offer the more appropriate and feasible development opportunity. In Conclusion, the Mixed Use land use designation offers a much more appropriate development opportunity for the property. The Mixed Use designation offers a more economically feasible development, it offers a better economic base for the City, and it offers more jobs and amenities for the Community. The Mixed Use land use can accomplish this with a minimum negative impact to the environment or the Community at large. The current proposed Hillside Residential land use offers few of these benefits. I would therefore like to ask that you change current proposed designation from "Hillside Residential" to either "Residential Mixed Use (RMU)" or "Commercial Mixed Use (CMU)." I want to thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Please let me know if you need any additional information. I have already submitted the attachments described below to the City and would like to ask that you please incorporate them into this letter. I am also sending additional copies of these attachments with this letter via overnight for your convenience. Best Regards, Eugene Gabrych Property owner Attachments: (1) Map of the proposed Land Use Designations, (2) Conceptual Map of potential Grading looking north from southern property boundaries, (3) Conceptual Map of the potential grading looking northeast from the southwest corner of the property Page 2 of 2 CITY OF inn LADE C LSIIYOIZE DREAM E)CTREME March 28, 2008 Adam Dodge Civic Partners 7777 Center Avenue Suite 300 Huntington Beach CA 92647 30 Subject: Proposed General Plan comments relative to Commercial Mixed Land Use designation. Dear Adam: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed application of the density bonus capabilities within the Commercial Mixed Use land use designation, similar to the density bonus allowed under the proposed Residential Mixed Use land use. Although 1 can appreciate your reasons for making this change, our consultants Jones & Stokes have indicated that such an inclusion at this time would change the assumptions on build -out population /density /intensity from what were made for the Draft Environmental Impact Report as the designation currently _states. Essentially this proposed change would increase the density potential and therefore is not advisable to make such a drastic change at this point in the process, since it would create a city-wide impact thereby delaying the General Plan Update. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzoLake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE EISINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG Rolfe Preisendanz From: Adam Dodge [adodge @civicpartners.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 5:30 PM To: Rolfe Preisendanz Subject: Comment to General Plan Update Mr. Preisendanz: Please accept this email as Civic Partners' comment to the General Plan relative to the Commercial Mixed Use Zoning We would request that density bonuses consistent with those identified in the proposed Residential Mixed Use Zoning regulations be added to the Commercial Mixed Use Zoning regulations. Particularly as applied to the Ballpark District. We also request that the density currently proposed for the Commercial Mixed Use Zoning regulations be adopted at a higher density than currently contemplated. Thank you, Adam Adam R. Dodge CIVIC PARTNERS (714) 230 -8000 (714) 230-8010 (FAX) 7777 Center Avenue, Suite 300 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR FIRM TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. IT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. Any dissemination or copying of this message and /or attachments by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by telephone, and destroy this message and any attachments. CITY OF^ LPL LSI� ICE SDREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Steve Johnson PIC Investments 31882 Monarch Crest Laguna Niguel CA 92677 31 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as APN 377 - 340 -004 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicated in your letter, although the properties are designated Hillside Residential as depicted on the Draft Preferred. Land Use Plan, Staff has accommodated your request by designating the subject properties as Medium Density on Alternative 2. In order to remain on track with the General Plan Update, staff cannot make the requested change from Hillside Residential Land Use as shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the Planning Commission Hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request to transfer the Land Use on Alternative 2 onto the Preferred Land Use Map. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanzna Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG Y�17 FROM : STEVE a CCD714)493 -0843 PHONE N0. 9492489596 Jan. 23 2006 05:56RM Pi ! To: The City of Lake Elsinore, Rolfe Preisendanz and all those concerned with the General. Plan Amendment From: Steve Johnson Owner of PIC Investments which owns 43.5 acres contiguous to 377 -340 -004 Date, January23rd, 2008 4:45pm I am writing to make sure my interests are being made known. 1 purchased my property nearly four Years ago with the understanding that it was to be used for Freeway Business and Medium Density Residential. I have been evolved with the group who has spent a great deal of money processing my property along with the 100 or so acres surrounding mine in a Specific Plan known as Porto Romano. We have been working on this for nearly two years and 1 was quite surprised when I saw that two versions of your amendments not only had not acknowledged Porto Romano but were actually suggesting down zoning our area. The Porto Romano Specific Plan is pulling design criteria from a number of first class projects from all around California. I believe that you could never attract a better development or design. May 1 please go on record with my request that you include Porto Romanos Specific Plan In your General Plan Amendment? Best Re^g rds SteveJoh on 31882 Monarch Crest Laguna Niguel 92677 (949)248 -9596 cell (949)910 -5000 RECE- V p JAN 2 3 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF LPL LSI� OIZE 'L DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Danny Brose Porto Romano LLC. 27128 A Paseo Espada Suite 1501 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 3Z Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the properties identified in the attached letter from Porto Romano LLC dated January 23, 2008. Dear Mr. Brose: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject properties. As you indicated in your letter, although the properties are designated Hillside Residential as depicted on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan, Staff has accommodated your request by designating the subject properties as Low Medium Density on Alternative 2. It is staffs suggestion that you or your designee attend the first Planning Commission Hearing which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008 and make your request to transfer that Land Use from Alternative 2 onto the Preferred Land Use Map. Albeit, staff will continue to recommend the Hillside Residential Land Use a shown on the Preferred Land Use Plan. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(cDLake- Elsinore org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W WW.LAKE- EISINORE.ORG Porto Romano LLC. January 23, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention- 1Zolfe Presisendenz, Community Development Director Regarding- AI'N 377 - 340 -003, 377 - 330 -005, 377 - 330 - 006,363- 090 - 011,363- 090 -003, 363- 090 - 001,363- 090 - 002,377 - 340 -011, 377- 340 - 010,377- 340 - 007,377 - 340- 004,377- 340 -005, 377 - 340 -001, 377- 340 -002, 377 - 340 -014, 377- 340 -015, 377 - 340 -021, 377 -340- 019, 377- 340 -018, 377 -340 -020 Dear Mr. Presisendenz, Porto Romano LLC. Is the developer of approximately 148 acres immediately west of the closed landfill and east of Elsinore Hills road. We have worked on this project for approximately three years, investing millions of dollars and much energy into the specific plan and EIR that are currently being processed by the City. We support the density for this project as allowed by the high density alternate. Sincerely. Danny Brose 27128 A Pasco Espada #1501 • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 •949- 488 -3800 CITY OF LADE ) LSIIA IZE DREAM EXTREME March 28, 2008 Danny Brose 27128 A Paseo Espada Suite 1501 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 33 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as 377 - 090 -012. Dear Mr. Brose: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. Although, you indicate in the letter that the subject property is designated High Density Residential, staff confirmed that the subject property is designated Commercial Mixed Use as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. Although this is contrary to what you expected staff believes that with the progression of retail type uses in the area, this land use could ultimately allow for the development of both a commercial component and as well as a high density residential component. As such Staff believes that the proposed. designation (Commercial Mixed Use) as shown on the Preferred Land Use. Plan would both accommodate the existing Commercial developments as well as allow for the future development of residential projects, satisfying the intent of the proposed Commercial Mixed Use Land Use. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(o)Lake- Elsinore orq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE EISINORE. CA 92530 WW W.LAKE -ELSI NORE.ORG Colorado Pacific Communities January 23, 2008 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention- Rolfe Presisendenz, Community Development Director Regarding- APN 377 - 090 -012 Dear Mr. Presisendenz, I am the owner of the above refrenced property and have owned the site for approximately four years. Prior to purchasing the property, we met with the planning department at the city offices and they informed us that the only reasonable usage for this site would be for high density residential that now shows in your current preferred alternate we support that land use. �.- Sincerely, Danny Brose 27128 A Pasco Espada 41501 s San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 • 949 - 488 -3800 CITY OF i.�� LADE 02 Cog DREAM EXTREME 3Y March 28, 2008 Norman Harris Real Estate Investments 32391 Riverside Drive Suite 16 Lake Elsinore CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for the property identified as 379 - 090 -021. Dear Mr. Harris: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property and our recent meeting regarding the same. As indicated in the letter you sent dated August 23, 2007, staff confirmed that the subject property and surrounding properties in question are designated Residential Mixed Use as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. As agreed in our meeting, the proposed designation for all properties, would both accommodate the existing Commercial Center as well as allow for the future development of a residential project, satisfying the intent of the proposed Residential Mixed Use Land Use. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz( Lake- Elsinore orc. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG HARRIS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS Since 1989 August 23, 2007 The City of Lake Elsinore Mr. Tom Weiner 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Regarding the General Plan Amendment: Dear Mr: Weiner: 1 have been appointed by the Seers Family to represent them in the matter of the proposed zone change to their property "379- 090 -021 & 379 - 090 - 022." Currently the property, located on Riverside Drive, is zoned General Commercial. In reviewing your General Plan Amendment, Alternative 1, 2 & 3 you are indicating a change to MDR for the above- mentioned parcels. We are in agreement with your suggestion for parcels 379- 090 -012, -013, -022 and -023 totaling 13.27 acres. However, because there is an existing Commercial Center on parcel 379- 090 -021, 6.48 acres, we respectfully request you to keep this parcel zoned as commercial and not change it. A Lot Line Adjustment was recorded on December 26, 2006 specifically for the purpose of splitting off the commercial from the remaining vacant land. During this time we have had the 13.27 acres in escrow with a developer intending to develop a medium density residential project but have failed to close escrow because the developer is receiving mixed signals from the planning department regarding the zone change. 1 am sure you are aware that these parcels abut the new Lake Elsinore High School, this fact alone would minimize the development of many. types of commercial use on this property and therefore, recommend that parcels 379 - 09.0 -012, 379 - 090 -013, 379 - 090 -022 & 379 - 090 -023 be zoned to MDR. I have inclosed a Riverside County GIS map outlining these parcels for your reference, and include Exhibit "B" Lot Line Adjustment Map No. 2007 -21 as additional reference.to be taken into consideration for making this change. 32391 Riverside Drive • Suite 16 Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 • Phone (951) 245 -1460 • Fax (951)245-3W August 23, 2007 The above described properties are all owned by family members of a single family. I and a member of the family are available to meet at your convenience, should you need additional conversation or supporting documentation on this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Norman Harris, Broker CITY OF L14YE bLS1110 E .DREAM EXTREME 3 April 8, 2008 S Norm Harris (Seers Family) 15891 Grand Avenue Suite 1 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for APN 379 - 090 -021 and 379 - 090 -022 Dear Mr. Harris: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed land use designations for the subject property located on the north side of Riverside Drive directly adjacent to Lakeside High School. As indicated in your correspondence, you had inquired about a medium density land use designation for these parcels. The subject area is identified as Residential Mixed Use as shown on the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan. This land use provides the flexibility for commercial uses while stressing a residential land use directly adjacent to the recently constructed high school. The mixed use designation also provides additional residential support to existing and future commercial development along portions of Riverside Drive. Although staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, you and /or the property owner will have an opportunity to address the Planning Commission with your request at the first Public Hearing, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz(aDLake- Elsinore orlq. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W. LAK E- E LS I N O RE.O RG HARRIS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS Sincea9 &9 August 23, 2007 The City ofLake Elsinore Mr. Tom Weiner 130 S. Main Street. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Regarding the General Plan Amendment` Dear -Mr.' Weiner: I have been.appointed by the Seers Family to represent them in the matter of the proposed :zone - change to their property "379 -090 -021 & 379 090- 022" Currently the property; located on Riverside.Drive, is zoned General Commercial. lhjeviewing pour General Plan Almendment Alternative 1, 2 & 3 you are indicating a change to MDR for the above- mentioned parcels. We are in agreement with your suggestion for parcels 379= 090 - 012; -013,.-022 and -023 totaling 13.27 acres: However, because there is an existing Commercial Center on parcel 379- 090 -021, 6.48 acres, we respectfully request you to keep this parcel zoned as commercial and not change it- A Lot Line Adjustment was recorded on December 26; 2006`specifically for the purpose.of splifting off the commercial'from the remaining vacant-hind. During this time we have had: the ' 13.27 acres?n'escrow with'a developer . intending to develop a medium density residential project but.have failed to close escrow because the developer is receiving mixed signalsfrom`the planning department regarding the zone change. I am sure you are aware that these parcels abut the new Lake Elsinore High School, this fact - alone would minimize the development of many types of commercial use on this property and. therefore, recommend that parcels 379- 090 -012; 379 090 -013, 379 =090 -022 & 379- 090 -023 be zoned to MDR. I have inclosed a Riverside CountyGIS map outlining these.parcels for your reference, and include Exhibit "B" Lot Line Adjustment Map No. N07.21 as additional reference to be.taken into consideration for making this change 15891 Grand Avenue + Suite 1. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 - Phone (951) 678 70076 • Fax (951) 678 -0289 August 23, 2007- The above described properties are all owned by family members of a single family. I and a member of the family are available to meet at your convenience, should you need additional conversation or supporting documentation on this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, r r9 arris CITY OF LADE LSIHOPT ` DREAM EXTREME • : 11: Richard Knapp P.O. Box 1006 Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 -1006 36 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation for Plan APN 378 -301 -021 and 005 Dear Mr. Knapp: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the proposed land use designations for APN 378 - 301 -021 and 005. The Preferred Land Use Alternative Map designates this property as Medium Density Residential. Although this is contrary to the Neighborhood Commercial Use designation that you are desirous of, you may still request that your property and adjacent area along Lakeshore Drive (cross of Machado) be designated Neighborhood Commercial based on the emergence of commercial development in the vicinity of your properly as well as existing conditions related to site access (alley) and adjacent vacant properties. Although, staff must proceed forward with the current Preferred Land Use Map, you can present your request to the Planning Commission at the first Public Hearing concerning the General Plan Update, which is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2008. If you have questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz _Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W. LA K E- E LS I N O R E.O RG 5/2/2007 To: City of Lake Elsinore c/o Planning Manager/ Community Development — Mr Tom Wiener 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore Ca 92530 From: Richard Knapp Jr Coldwell Banker Realty 600 Central Ave Suite E Lake Elsinore Ca 92530 Mailing address: p.o. box 1006 Lake Elsinore Ca 92531 -1006 Thank you for your recent call back on the proposed new zoning map. I am pleased with the new open attitude to my concern, However,I have tried to rent it for the past few years, But Nobody at the front desk can seem to give the same answer out Two or more times, So it sits unrefreshed, and lifeless. I could go on but I will hold it. I own the property at 16474 Lakeshore Dr. Lake Elsinore Ca 92530. Built in the 1920- 1930s. City records show nothing. Re: parcel #s 378 - 301 -021 and 005. see plot map. A.K.A jackies thrift shop Built as a Burger Restaurant and local store prior to Stater Brothers Going in. Zoned Cl It was Purchased to someday build a business building to serve the north end buyers ,sellers,builders,visitors and more. I would like You to send me the paperwork needed to Keep it Cl zoned. The new Proposed Down zoning or RI or R2 Will not sit well with me! The fact is, that the city need to set more zoning aside for business people . Lake Elsinore has been Bedroom Community for way too long, And I feel a equal base of homes and places for people to shop, and open a business, Will make our values surpass Murrieta and Temecula area. The proposed zoning seems to keep it a bedroom community, and we are loosing dollars that should be spent in Lake Elsinore. Thank ��You �for your time chRi' a d I{napp Jr CITY OF LADELSIHOIZE v DREAM Z J `7 April 8, 2008 Randy Ziegler c/o Carl Winkle 840 N. Glendora Avenue Glendora CA 91741 Subject: Proposed General Plan designation, particularly the property known as La Laguna Heights Speck Plan, which includes APNs 391 -181- 013, 391 - 183 -002, 007 located within the City Limits. Dear Mr. Ziegler: Thank you for your inquiry as to the proposed designation of the subject property. As you indicated in your letter, the property identified above was a part of an Annexation which was never completed and a Specific Plan that was approved by the City of Lake Elsinore on May 10, 1994. Since the Public Review Period of the Draft environmental Impact Report, staff thoroughly analyzed and researched the question of the entitlement for the La Laguna Heights Specific Plan. Although staff currently believes that the Assessor Parcel Numbers under the Specific Plan that within the City would be more appropriately designated as Open Space or at least Hillside Residential, staff will include a land use recommendation in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission that the City must honor the original approval and the validity of the approved Specific Plan. As such and with the concurrence of the Planning Commission, Staff will change the designation of the properties within the entire Specific Plan area as dark grey or Approved Specific Plan prior to the next Hearing. Your letter of January 23, 2007 and this letter will be included in the Staff Report to Commission as an attachment. Staff would recommend that you reaffirm your request to the Planning Commission at the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing located in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at Rpreisendanz (a)Lake- Elsinore.org. Sincerely, Al Rolfe M. Preisendanz 951.674.3104rector of Community Development 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 WW W.IAKE- ELSINORE.ORG LIP C LV7 �DFEB 1 2 2007 February-8,2007 City of Lake Elsinore Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Community Development Director 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Dear Mr. Preisendanz: I understand that the City of Lake Elsinore is in the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan. I commend you for taking on this very difficult task. I am writing this letter as a lake Elsinore property owner for the purpose of assuring that my properties are accurately represented in the new General Plan. One of these properties is an approximate 1,200 acre site in the City's Sphere of Influence (SOI) on the west side of the City. In reviewing the City's General Plan Update Background Report, I noticed that the C"it"pproved Laguna Heights Country Club Specific Plan for this property is not referenced in the report or identified on a number of the exhibits that identify Specific Plan areas. Furthermore, the draft General Plan Land Use Map does not identify the site as a Specific Plan area. The Laguna Heights Specific Plan was approved by the City in 1994 by adoption of a Specific Plan ordinance subject to annexation of the site into the City. Although the site has not been annexed, it is important that the General Plan recognize existing Specific Plan approvals, such as the Laguna Heights Specific Plan. Furthermore, because the Specific Plan has not expired, the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Traffic Study should also account for the approved land uses in the Specific Plan, which include 888 residences, a golf course and clubhouse and open space. By accounting for this Speck Plan, the General Plan EIR and traffic study will be studying the true cumulative impacts of development in the City. I understand the City has a copy of the approved Spec Plan in the Spec Plan library at the City's Planning and Building front counter, however, if you need additional information about the approved Speck Plan or copies of the certified EIR, please do not hesitate to contact me. I appreciate your consideration of this request and inclusion of the Laguna Heights Specific Plan into the City's General Plan Update. Sincer X RandyZ e" 54M Attachments. Map of Laguna Heights Specific Plan Area J ,. CITY OF MS LADE LSINORE DREAM 1W - 58 April 10, 2008 Gloria Healy 6 Villa Scencero Lake Elsinore, CA 92532 Subject: Letter concerning the Update to the Lake Elsinore General Plan Update. Dear Ms. Healy This letter will attempt to answer your questions raised during your review of the Draft General Plan, to be considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on April 15, 2008. Figure 2.1 a, etc. The slopes to the south are under the jurisdiction of the City of Canyon Lake; where future use of the property is determined by Canyon Lake. The area to the east (currently vacant) is an approved subdivision extending from the edge of your subdivision to Greenwald. The line on a boundary map is just that, a line on a map used for reference and identification. The survey coordinates the boundary of your property is a set location no matter where the line appears on the map. Section 2.3.3 Your questions concern specific plans and the duration of time in which they are valid. Approval of a specific plan entitles the developer to improve the property specifically to the conditions of the plan. Once the project is constructed the specific plan governs the project and is not altered by the City. A specific plan may be amended however, prior to actual development and is conducted in the same. manner as the original approval of the specific plan and that is through a public hearing. 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 W W W.LAKE -E LSI NORE.ORG Response Letter to Gloria Healy General Plan Update The CC &R's are a private contract between the Homeowners Association and the individual property owners of your subdivision. The only involvement the City would have is to review and accept the CC &R's prior to recording of the documents. The City cannot revise or initiate any change your CC &R's. Figure 2.5 The Airport Influence Area shows the various airports in western Riverside County including the small Skylark Airport located at the south end of the Lake. The location of this map is in the Circulation section where all forms of movement are located (pedestrian, motorized, bicycle etc). The noise generated by the airport is not consistent and does not have a noise contour above 60 debacles maintained for a consistent period of time in much the same manner as the noise contour lines for transportation corridors (i.e. 1 -15). Figure 3.1 All maps have been updated and are now consistent; the new map will be in the adopted version of the General Plan Section 3.3.9 Since you complied with the fire management regulation at the time of subdivision approval and occupation the new regulations concerning modification plans do not pertain to you nor are they retroactive. Section 3.4.6 Reference to other aircraft are not shown on our maps since airports and aircraft are regulated by various state and federal agencies and cannot by law, be regulated by any municipal agency. In every occasion the military aircraft are flying above 1000' as are the smaller publicly owned aircraft in the form of small airplanes and helicopters. The noise generated by these craft cannot be regulated for the same reason. Noise meters were set out in preparation of the noise section of the General Plan and it appears from the noise contours the primary noise generator is along the 1 -15 corridor, overhead aircraft noise is short term. Noise Policies You answered your own question. Helicopters are part of our environment where we unable to avoided noise generated. Also, they are not regulated by the City for those reasons stated above. The primary use of helicopters in this vicinity is for law enforcement activity or fire fighting capacity. Very few private helicopters land in the City causing noise impacts in a very limited area. The helicopter routes are also regulated by the Federal government, and generally run along Response Letter to Gloria Healy General Plan Update major transportation corridors, the City does not have jurisdiction over the routes taken by small aircraft. Your comments concerning the noise generated by large trucks using exhaust brakes is best addressed later by presenting your concerns to the City Council who may impose a regulation prohibiting the use of exhaust brakes in the City. The Plan for March Base was adopted several years ago and is intended as an Air Reserve Base combined with a limited commercial base for non - passenger activity. There is no need to mention this in the City's General Plan since, at this point, the City is not directly affected by the activity at the Base. If, in the future, the Base Plan is modified and amended the City will have an opportunity to comment during the public review period. MSHCP questions I am forwarding the section of the staff report that addresses your specific questions concerning the MSHCP and the City's relationship with the document. Figure 4.2 Vacant lands refer to property that is vacant without any structures. There may be small areas where a line is not in the exact location. Your situation is not considered vacant land. The amount of land deleted by the correction on the map would probably not change the numbers since it is such a small area. Section 4.3.4 The City always encourages the provision of open space when it is considering new development. When "encouraging" open space easements it is in conjunction with larger properties proposed for larger development. The word "encourage" should not be confused with "coerced ". Figure 4.5 through 4.8 Section 5.4.1 The purpose of the General Plan is to give the owner of a property the right to develop that property. All properties in the City have a land use designation that lets them know how the City envisions their property for future development. The entire development process is a balancing of public and private good, creating a mutual benefit between two parties. Response Letter to Gloria Healy General Plan Update Additional comments: • District Plans: The District Plan is a part of the General Plan and will be adopted at the same time along with the Environmental Impact Report. • Section 8.1: The Lake Elsinore Hills District Plan includes the Specific Plan adopted for Tuscany Hills. The Tuscany Hills Specific Plan is the land use designation for the development and will not change unless a developer requests an amendment. Approximately 50% of the .specific plan area remains vacant and undeveloped. A request for an amendment to the plan was submitted to the City for processing. Both the Planning Commission and City Council will conduct public hearing to consider the amendment request. • There will be no conflict between the General Plan and District Plans since they are one in the same. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map automatically amends the District Plan Map. • Section 8.3.3: As I mentioned above, the Homeowners Association is created by the CC &R's and is a private contract between the entity and the parties to the CC &R's. In addition, any changes to any land use within the City are noticed in the locally adjudicated newspaper and through notification of property owners within 300' radius of the project site. • Section 8.4.1: The polices pertaining to development stated in the General Plan refers to new development not already existing developed area. • Section 8.8: We will review the maps and make a correction if necessary Comments about CEQA Analvsis As to the question regarding the definition of "DU "; "DU" is an industry wide abbreviation for dwelling Unit. Additionally Chapter 2 (Community Form) of the General Plan has used the term "dwelling unit" interchangeably. Albeit, staff can certainly include additional language to provide clarification and definition to that abbreviation on Page XVI of the Environmental Impact Report. Figure 8: Commented above As to the following bulleted items, Staff was unable to answer since there was a lack of page references of where these items were located, specifically in either the EIR, Appendices, General Plan or District Plan. Staff would be more than happy to answer your questions if you can provide precise locations within these documents. Response Letter to Gloria Healy General Plan Update • Table 6 (Page 18): Duty Factor is not described. • Table 7(Page 19); "Flow Factor"is not described. • Section 111 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT (page 27): Figure 9 - Slope Analysis- is referenced here but does not exist in this document. Please note that the General Plan Update has been duly noticed for the 1st Planning Commission Public Hearing in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center — 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore California on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674 -3124 extension 223 or email me at RpreisendanzeLake- Elsinore.oro. Sincerely, Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development Comments about the Draft General Plan from Gloria Heal Gloria Healy 6 Villa Scencero Lake Elsinore, CA 92532 909 268 9781 (mobile) gloria @aceweb.com January 23, 2008 Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Rolfe, Below are my comments about the draft version of the city's General Plan and related documents. Sincerely, Gloria Healy My comments about the draft GENERAL PLAN • Figure 2.1a, Figure 2.1b, Figure 2.1c and most of maps included in this document: City boundary lines are drawn inside the city boundary edge and causing some properties (and their uses) not to be shown. In particular, my slope property (at 6 Villa Scencero) is obscured by the boundary line on these maps and causes me to wonder if my slope (and lovely view of canyon lake from the street across my slope) would not be affected by city's proposed goals and policies. I would like to see aversion of all these maps /plans with the city boundary drawn outside the boundary rather than inside the boundary. • Section 2.3.3 (page 2 -20) : The final paragraph states that the city may adopt a new specific plan IF the project will encompass 250 or more acres. According to Table LEH -T3 (in District Plans) all 4 specific plan areas are greater than 250 acres. Does that mean the City may change any of the existing Specific Plan at anytime without the consent of the owners? In some instances, a change of the Specific Plan would change the CC &R's and, ordinarily, a change of the CC &R's requires 2/3 vote of the residents in my association (Tuscany Hills). Will the city have the right to override our CC &R's and bylaws? Page 1 of 5 Comments about the Draft General Plan from Gloria Heal • Figure 2.5 (Page 2 -35): I could not find an explanation for this figure. Do these "Airport Influence Areas' represent a certain decibel level of noise? If so, what is that level and shouldn't this figure be moved to Section 3.4 about noise? • Figure 3.1 Wildfire Susceptibility (Page 3 -9): Why is the City's fire map (in this plan) so radically different than the State's or County's maps? None of these maps agree. ❖ See California's proposed fire map at: http: / /www.fire.ca.gov /fire protection /fhsz maps /fhsz maps riversid ewest.php ❖ See County Land Information System online http: / /www3.tl m a.co. rive rside.ca. us • Section 3.3.9 Wildfire Hazards Goals and Policies (Page 3 -21) : The 100' clearance from structure is not a new policy however the definition of "structure" has changed (both in the city and at the county) since I moved into my home. My home complies with the old approved fuel modification plan for tract 24383 (dated 8/2000) but not with the new policy (because of the relatively recent change in definition to structure). Will the city continue to allow the old FMZ plan (which is backed by a MOU between cities and USFWS written in the 1990's) or will the city required me and others to rip out our landscaping to conform to the new policy? 4 Section 3.4.6 Airports (Page 3 -27): Other aircraft (not assoc. with the local airports) need to be mentioned. There are the military jets from March Air Force Base and (police or sheriff) helicopters. • Noise Policies (Page 3 -28): Helicopters are particularly noisy and disruptive. Can the city at study this problem — if (city or county) helicopters cannot be avoided? Trucks are more noisy than cars particularly climbing hills or using exhaust brakes to descend. Perhaps the city should add policies to set truck routes or post signs prohibiting the use of exhaust brakes. Shouldn't there be a brief discussion about the possibility of the conversion of March Air Force Base to a commercial airport and whether or not advanced planning is needed? Page 2 of 5 Comments about the Draft General Plan from Gloria Healy (Military aircraft may be loud but at least it is infrequent. Commercial aircraft usually run 24 hours and might take on a different noise contour according to different landing and takeoff patterns.) Figure 4.1 Vegetation Communities (Page 4 -17) : Shouldn't this map show where existing habitats are located? How can city residents judge and comment on a plan without this information? I seem to recall that "edges" are mentioned somewhere in plan. Don't these "edges" describe or include the interfaces to MSHCP boundaries outside the city? If so, why are they not shown in this figure? They are not shown anywhere else in this plan. • Section 4.2.4 Existing and Proposed Conservation Areas (Page 4 -19): "Cells" are not described very well. Where are these cells or how will they be defined, and why are they not shown graphically in this document? There is no explanation for how the city will "focus and distribute the conservation effort between land owner development interests and permanent conservation based on City Council's independent land use authority." Could this mean that an owner might have to give up some property or easement to the city just to obtain a building permit to build a porch, for example? • Section 4.2.5 MSHCP Policies (Page 4 -19): The wording in Goal 1 "...balancing .... private property rights...." causes me great concern. Does this mean the city might "take" property or force current owners to make major changes to their property? • Figure 4.2 Vacant lands 2005 (page 4 -23) : The resolution of the underlying photo is difficult to zoom in on but it looks like there is a tiny spec of "vacant land" on the slope portion of my property. Be aware that my slope is now landscaped, surrounded by fence and is connected to house (i.e. the fence between the house and slope were removed.) In other words, my slope should not be mistaken for open or vacant land. Please exclude my property from the 'Open space' inventory. • Section 4.3.4 Policies (Page 4 -25): How does the city intend to "encourage open space easement dedication ... on private property'? Does this include established homes as well as newly developed properties? HOW will the city "encourage" owners? This sounds suspiciously like owners will be coerced into giving easements. Page 3 of 5 Comments about the Draft General Plan from Gloria Heal • Figures 4.6 through 4.8 and their descriptions: This section looks messed up. There are a number of important questions to ask about these figures but this is difficult without a correction to the descriptive information. For example, I want to know about the area's shown as number 7 and 8 in figure 4.7 but the description of area #8 is described as being mainly outside the city boundaries which is incorrect, and it is associated with figure 4.6, not figure 4.7. Please correct this. • Section 5.4.1 Goal #1 (Page 5 -11) Again I see the ominous use of "..balancing .... property right....". Without an explanation of HOW the city will "balance property rights ", I am very suspicious of the meaning or intent behind these words. My comments about the Draft District plans (as shown on the L.E. website • This document does not include and expand on district information covered in the General Plan? Is the intent of the city to complete these district plans after the general plan is approved? ■ Section 8.1 Introduction (Page LEH -1): Last sentence in last paragraph on this page states: "Should a discrepancy or conflict exist as between the Lake Elsinore Hills District and an approved specific plan, the City approved specific plan shall prevail." To make sure I am clear on this, does this mean "...the City specific plan shall prevail over the Lake Elsinore Hills District Plans ". Doesn't this conflict with the General Plan, which says "...the City may replace the specific plan if the number of acres exheeds 250 acres'. (See comment for 2.3.3 under General Plan, above)? What prevails if there is a discrepancy or conflict between the General Plan and the District Plans or another one of the related documents? ■ Section 8.3.3 Overall District Goal and Policy (Page LEH -8 ) : Will the home owner associations of the LEH District be impacted financially. Are there any other non - obvious impacts to these HOAs, the members who serve their boards or committees, the residents, CC &R's, etc. Will the HOAs be consulted before the city implements a change within that HOA district? ■ Section 8.4.1 (Page LEH -9) : Page 4 of 5 Comments about the Draft General Plan from Gloria Healy Do these policies only apply to new developments or will these be applied to previously developed private property (even where a policy does not conflict with the Specific Plan)? ■ Section 8.8 (page LEH -15) : • The relative location of this future planning area is described as "east" of the LEH District. According to the maps in the Draft of the General Plan, it should be "west' or "north -west' of the LEH District. My comments about the CEQA ANALYSIS • Table 1 (Page 7): Abbreviation "DU" is not defined. • Figure 8 (Page 13): city boundary is drawn incorrectly. • . Table 6 (Page 18): "Duty Factor" is not described. • Table 7 (Page 19): "Flow Factor" is not described. • Section III HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT (Page 27) :Figure 9 —Slope Analysis- is referenced here but does not exist in this document. Page 5 of 5 Attachment 5 Large exhibits of the Preferred Land Use Plan; Alternative No. 1 Land Use Plan; and, Alternative No. 2 Land Use Plan Attachment 7 VICINITY MAP SOUTH SHORE I PLANNING COMMISSION Attachment 8 LA LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN Attachment 9 ATTACHMENT No. 9 EXPANSION of BALLPARK DISTRICT APN 373 - 210 -030 PLANNING COMMISSION 04/15/2008 N U ate+ Y {fir, T r pn 0 u� W Q J d a a iWr W C N $ Q G a z . � y � V v ju¢ Q Y C O Q u V •n e z ai m i e i c 0 = w Z c` ..i i e r C e C G a. i CS U i M .Demo m B� ;a s t