Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-09-1985 City Council Minutes -- o o (Y) w (D <( MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 1985 213' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 7:02 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Knight. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Norton, City Attorney Nazarek, Community Development Director Corcoran, City Engineer Culp, Finance Director Barrick, Personnel Director Schoolcraft, RDA Administrator Modesti and City Clerk Money. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. CEREMONIALS A. Proclamation - "Earthquake Preparedness Week" _ Mayor Valenzuela read a Proclamation declaring the week of April 15 through April 20, 1985 as "Earthquake Preparedness Week". Mr. Ray Kemp of Disaster Preparedness, reported that there will be an earthquake simulation drill over a six county area, including Riverside County, sometime during the week of April 15 - 20, 1985. He urged citizens of Lake Elsinore to participate and become more informed about this type of disaster. B. Proclamation - "City Beautification Week" Mayor Valenzuela read a Proclamation declaring the week of April 22 through April 27, 1985 as "City Beautification Week" in the City of Lake Elsinore. C. The City Clerk read a letter from Supervisor Walt Abraham, commending Mayor Valenzuela on her leadership and efforts in support of the Lake Management Grant Program. D. Proposed Landfill Sites Mayor Valenzuela introduced Douglas Isbell, Deputy Road Commissioner and Surveyor for the County of Riverside who gave an update on what is taking place regarding replacement or expansion of the landfill in Lake Elsinore. __ The existing site is nearing capacity and will probably be closed by June, 1986. The County is currently considering two possible sites, one site is near the Prado Dam and the other is at Dawson Canyon between Corona and Lake Elsinore. The County has also made attempts to purchase adjacent land to the existing site, for expansion. Mr. Isbell stated he would like Council support for the possible expansion of the existing landfill site. Mayor Valenzuela suggested a committee be established consisting of herself and one other Council member, to work with the County on determining future landfill site. Mr. Strigotte requested this matter be placed on the April 23 agenda for Council review. 214 c Page two City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 CONSENT CALENDAR Mr. Molendyk requested Item Number 9 - Collier Avenue Street Improvements - be removed from the Consent Calendar and be placed on the Redevelopment Agency Agenda under Item 7 - New Business. He also requested Item Number 12 - Railroad Canyon Road - be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed under Business Items - Number 57. The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further considera- tion and discussion: - Item Nambers 1 A, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 and 17. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY MATSON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes: b) Approved minutes of regular Council meeting on March 26, 1985. 2. Received and Filed Building Division Monthly Activity Report for March, 1985. 4. Approved request of Evangelina Ramirez for use of kitchen facilities at Community Center on Saturday, July 27, 1985, for a wedding reception. 6. Approved Resolution No. 85-21 Reallocating Title IIIB Funds for Fiscal Year 1984/85, to be applied toward the purchase of a Canon NP-155 Copier for the Senior Center. RESOLUTION NO. 85-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR RE-ALLOCATION OF TITLE III-B FUNDS (ONE TIME ONLY) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984-1985 UNDER THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965, AS r AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE ALL DOCUMENTS TO SUBMIT APPLICATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR FUNDS. - 8. Denied Resolution authorizing stop signs at Graham Avenue and Spring Street. 9. Collier Avenue Street Improvements - Moved to Redevelopment Agency Agenda. 10. Rejected all bids for Specification No. 102 - Pre-Insulated Pressure Pipe for Geothermal Well and authorized staff to undertake new studies and readvertise at a later date. 12. Railroad Canyon Road - Progress Report - Moved to Business Items. 14. Authorized staff to work with two property owners on Riverside Drive and to utilize the 1913 Construction and 1915 Bond Act assessment proceedings to obtain public improvements which Council ordered be installed. 15. Received and filed cost estimate report for temporary crossing of lake outflow channel at Limited, Pottery, Flint and Poe Streets. 16. Received and filed tentative completion schedule for Lincoln Street storm drain. - 18. Authorized City Clerk1s Office to sell City lapel pins, either individually or to local groups, at a cost of $2.00 each. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 1 a. Minutes - Adjourned Council Meeting - March 21, 1985 Mr. Matson requested the minutes be amended as follows: Page 2 - Condition Number 4 - Add the following wording: IIRailroad Canyon Road to be improved to a four-lane roadway with a minimum of two left-turn lanesll. - o o (Y) w en <l: - - Page three City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 215 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued. 1 a. Continued. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO AMEND THE MINUTES OF MARCH 21, 1985 ADJOURNED COUNCIL MEETING, PAGE TWO, CON- DITION NUMBER 4, BY ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING WORDING: "RAILROAD CANYON ROAD TO BE IMPROVED TO A FOUR-LANE ROADWAY WITH A MINI- MUM OF TWO LEFT-TURN LANES". 3. Warrant List - March, 1985 Mr. Vermillion questioned warrant numbers 03831,03856,03921. Mr. Strigotte questioned warrant number 03924. Ms. Barrick gave explanations for these expenditures. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE WARRANT LIST FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1985, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FOUR HUNDRED-FIFTY-FIVE THOUSAND-ONE-HUNDRED-SIXTY-TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY- EIGHT CENTS ($455,162.28). AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NOES: VERMILLION 5. Request for Waiver of Fees for Swick and Matich Fields for Men's Softball League - 1985 Season. Mr. Knight stated that the City should consider, in the near future that fees be charged for use of these facilities. Mrs. Valenzuela stated that in the joint agreement with the Recreation and Park District it was stated that fees would be charged to adult groups and fees would be waived for youth groups. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED TO WAIVE FEES FOR USE OF SWICK AND MATICH FIELDS FOR LAKE ELSINORE MEN'S SOFTBALL LEAGUE, FOR THE 1985 SEASON ONLY. AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION NOES: VALENZUELA 7. Resolution Numbers 85-22 and 85-23 - Multi-Family Revenue Bonds - Elsinore Lakeside Investors - Rental Housing Project - Lincoln and Riverside Drive. Councjl discussed the inclusion of wording to include the cost of adminis- trative fees which the City will incur, in the body of the resolutions. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBERS 85-22 AND 85-23, SUBJECT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF REASONABLE FEE TO DEFRAY ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES INCURRED BY STAFF. RESOLUTION NO. 85-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, OF INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. RESOLUTION NO. 85-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, OF INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NOES: VERMILLION 216page four City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued. 11. Relocation of Donated Building to Chamber of Commerce Building Area. Mr. Knight reported that he has been approached by the old Centennial committee and possibly the Recreation and Parks District who would like to discuss ways they might fund relocating this structure and turning it into a museum. MOVED BY KNIGHT TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS. - Motion died for lack of second. Mr. Molendyk read a letter from Mr. Pittman who offered to purchase the structure from the City for ten dollars and remove the building before September 1, 1985. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY MATSON AND CARRIED TO CONCUR WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO DEMOLISH THE HOUSE LOCATED BEHIND THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT LANGSTAFF AND GRAHAM, DELAY SIXTY (60) DAYS TO ALLOW MR. PITTMAN OR ANY OTHER ORGANIZATION WHO WISHES, TO MOVE THE HOUSE TO ANOTHER LOCATION AT THEIR OWN COST. AYES: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA NOES: KNIGHT 13. Modification to Standard Deferral Agreement. Mr. Matson stated that staff is recommending changing the time limit for calling up deferred agreements from ninety (90) to one-hundred-eighty (180) days. We have gone over three-hundred days on the Lakeshore Drive deferrals called up last May. He suggested the system be changed, possibly bond for the improvements instead of requiring deferral agreement and possibly approve street improvement plans prior to building. Requested staff bring back another report. - MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO DENY STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF ONE-HUNDRED-EIGHTY DAYS AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE ANOTHER REPORT TO INCLUDE REQUIREMENT OF BONDING AND PREPARATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS AT POINT OF APPROVAL. 17. Council Support for Five Cent Gas Tax Increase - Senate Bill SB 290. Mr. Vermillion stated that he objects to the Council supporting increased taxation. He doubts that the increase would find its way into the road fund. Road improvements needed should come through reduced costs not in- creased taxation. Mayor Valenzuela read from the League of California Cities Legislative Bulletin which quoted Governor Deukmejian as saying that local government can take care of transportation system with existing revenue sources and if additional revenue sources are needed, tax increases should be approved by local taxpayers. Approximately eight counties have voted on local option gas tax and it failed to pass. The League of California Cities supports Senate Bill SB 290. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED TO SUPPORT SENATE BILL 290 FOR FIVE CENT GAS TAX INCREASE, AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE LETTER OF SUPPORT TO SENATOR FORAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NOES: VERMILLION PUBLIC HEARINGS - 31. Draft Canyon Creek Specific Plan - Railroad Canyon - A Joint Venture - Residential Specific Plan for 491 Acres. Mayor Valenzuela opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. asking staff to report and give recommendations. ~ o o M W m ~ ~ .... Page five City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 217 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 31. Draft Canyon Creek Specific Plan - Continued. Mr. Corcoran reported that the project is a residential specific plan for four-hundred-ninety-one acres allowing a maximum of 1413 dwelling units with commercial public facilities and recreational uses, located north of San Jacinto River, Railroad Canyon Road is to the South, 1-15 bisects the site and undeveloped grasslands lie to the north and south. Mr. Corcoran reported on the background of the project and stated that Planning Commission recommends approval of the draft specific plan subject to certain modifications. The City Clerk reported no written correspondence or protests. Mayor Valenzuela asked those in favor of Draft Canyon Creek Specific Plan to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Lawrence Buxton, President of Cortin and Associates, planners and engineers of the project. He requested fifteen minutes to make his presentation and proceeded to show slides of the area. He asked that condition number nineteen be modified, with concurrence of the city engineer, and add the following language: "Railroad Canyon must be bonded and improved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as negotiated in consideration of Ordinance Number 572. Mr. Buxton urged Council approve this project. Mayor Valenzuela asked those in opposition to Draft Canyon Creek Specific Plan to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:13 p.m. Lengthy Council discussion ensued regarding safety of the Railroad Canyon dam, project density, lot sizes, provision of fire station, noise buffers, and lack of adequate parking in heavi"ly used areas. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO DENY DRAFT CANYON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN AND RETURN TO STAFF TO REVIEW COUNCIL CONCERNS. 32. Tentative Tract Map 20472 - Railroad Canyon - A joint venture - Proposal to subdivide 30+ acres into two-hundred-two residential lots and two acres of commercial development, located east of 1-15 and north of Railroad Canyon Road, within the easterly region of Canyon Creek Specific Plan Area. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO REMOVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20472 FROM THE AGENDA UNTIL APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT CANYON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN. 33. Tentative Tract Map 20473 - Railroad Canyon - A joint venture - Proposal to subdivide a commercial lot consisting of 12.7 acres within the Canyon Creek Specific Plan Area, located west of 1-15, north of Railroad Canyon Road, within the easterly region of Canyon Creek Specific Plan. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO REMOVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20473 FROM THE AGENDA UNTIL APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT CANYON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN. COUNCIL RECESSED AT 8:35 P.M. COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 8:43 P.M. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised - Draft Environmental Impact Report and Addendum to Draft E.l.R. and Planned Unit Development 84-2 - John C. Heersj Boyle Engineering. Mayor Valenzuela opened the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. and asked staff to identify the project and give staff recommendations. 218page six City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised - Continued. Mr. Corcoran reported that Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised is a proposal to subdivide forty (40) acres into one-hundred-seventy-four (174) lots for single-family residential use. The project is located on the southerly side of Grand Avenue at Bonnie Lea Drive, approximately nine-hundred (900) feet southeasterly of the Ortega Highway (Route 74). Subject map is a resubmitted project that incorporates city concerns addressing drainage, minimum lot size, wastewater disposal, recreational land uses and coordin- ation with adjacent property development. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised and Planned Unit Development 84-2, subject to sixty-three conditions as modified and deleted, and approval and certification of Draft Environmental Impact Report and Addendum to Draft Environmental Impact Report, including all staff and agency recommendations and changes, as the Final Environmental Impact Report. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Valenzuela asked those in favor of Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised, to speak. The following persons spoke: - 1. Esther Owens, 2639 Quail Knoll, Lake Elsinore, stated she owns the property adjacent to this project and feels the density is too heavy. 2. Bill Heers, 1450 E. Cooley Drive, Colton, project developer, stated they have been working with staff for several months and have made many revisions to the project, related to staff and Council concerns. He commented that the tract will be a benefit to the community and urged Council to approve the project. 3. Jack Reeves, Boyle Engineering, San Bernardino, commented on the drainage problems which became apparent after they started. After discussion with Riverside County Flood Control, the developer has agreed to construct a one-million dollar ($1,000,000) flood control channel. This will be of benefit to the city and the surrounding property owners. , - Mayor Valenzuela asked those in opposition to Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Joe Pendergast, Civil Engineer, project engineer for the development immediately adjacent to this project. They are developing eighteen acres into two subdivisions. The development is in Riverside County. He has coordinated with city planners to insure the project would be compatible with city standards. The project he is working on contains lots of 7000 to 9000 square feet in size. He commented on the subject tract lots being 38 to 40 feet in width and exceedingly long. This is not a desireable feature. Also, only thi'rty-three acres are being developed in the subject tract because thirteen acres are undevelopable slopes. Stated the subject project could be a detriment to the City of Lake Elsinore. Mayor Valenzuela closed the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Council discussion followed regarding inclusion of this tract in Mello Roos and Lighting and Landscaping Districts, inclusion of formal warning to buyers regarding flood hazard, mitigation of water run-off, minimum lot size allowable in a Planned Unit Development, hook-up to sewers and benefits of the proposed flood control channel. ~ Mr. Knight asked staff to follow-up with the County of Riverside, regarding drainage mitigation of the adjacent County tract. Mr. Matson suggested revisions to conditions 11, 14, 21,49, 52,60,62 and 63. 219 Page Seven City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISrD. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19358 REVISED, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER CONTROL BOARD, LAKE ELSINORE RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT, ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND SOUTHERN CALIF- ORNIA GAS COMPANY, AND PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS AS MODIFIED, AND REVISED AS FOLLOWS: ' - l. ~ t-- 2. t-- I"":) Cl 3. 0 4. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Elementary and High School Districts to off-set overcrowding. Applicant shall submit landscaping plan for street trees. Trees are to be placed at 30-foot intervals and be approved by City Engineer. All trees planted along streetscape must be 15 gallon size. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division and Engineering Depart- ment a map showing all phases of development, if applicable. 5. Trailers utilized during the construction phase shall be approved by the Planning Division. - 6. All building plans shall be reviewed by the City of Lake Elsinore Building Department and/or International Council of Building Officials (ICBO) for review and utilization of highest Uniform Building Code values pertaining to seismic structural design. 7. Meet County Fire Department requirements. 8. Meet County Health Department requirements. 9. Meet Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. 10. Applicant shall submit design elevation and landscaping plan to the Design Review Board for approval. 11. Applicant shall participate in City-wide signage program, a cost of which is to be provided prior to recordation of final map. 12. All signage must be under permit. 13. Provide transit facilities (i.e., covered bus stops) within said project as deemed applicable by Chairman of Lake Elsinore Transit System. 14. Prior to recordation of the final map or within twelve months, whichever is later, Tentative Tract Map 19358 Revised and Planned Unit Development 84-2 shall be included within a district to be formed under the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972, to pay'for the annual cost of lighting, landscaping and parks which benefit the project, through the levy and collection of an annual assessment. 15. All slopes must be planted with erosion control vegetation, to be approved by the Planning Division. 16. Approval for Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISED is contingent upon approval of the Planned Unit Development 84-2 and certification of the Focused Environmental Impact Report. 17. Submit Design Plans for a reverse frontage decorative block wall along Grand Avenue frontage to be reviewed by Planning Division and sent to Design Review Board for review and approval. 18. DELETED. 220 Page eight City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISED - Continued. 19. Meet all conditions of Ordinance No. 572. 20. Applicant will contribute pro-rata share of maintaining fire fighting facilities to serve the southern end of City. Amount not to exceed $25,000.00. ... 21. CC & R's for the Tract shall prohibit on-site street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers, roof-mounted microwave receivers and trucks over one ton capacity. CC & R's and Homeowner's Association rules and regu- lations shall be submitted to the Planning Division to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Applicant to participate in formation of a Mello Roos Community-Facilities District to be formed under the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to pay for the cost of parks, fire, police and flood control services, through the annual levy and collection of a special tax within the project area. 22. Submit design plans (building elevations) that incorporate Class "A" roofing material for all residential units proposed within project, to be reviewed by Planning Division and sent to Design Review Board for review and approval. 23. Applicant shall revise Recreation Conceptual Plan to reflect a relocation of tot lot to an internal area within the hillside development, to be approved by Planning Division. 24. Applicant is to provide a master lighting plan indicating low level - lighting placed at appropriate intervals along the internal sidewalk design and along the fire break access roadway subject to approval by Planning Division. .., 25. DELETED. 26. A twenty-five foot (251) clear zone should be maintained between fire access roadway and Lot 175 (open space). Clear zone should remain an open area, free of combustiona1 growth, dead vegetation, or other natural or unnatural materials that would promote fire hazards. 27. A twenty-foot (20') roadway easement widening be incorporated between Lots 35 and 36; and between Lots 53 and 54, subject to approval by Engineering and Planning Departments. 28. Dedicate street right-of-way along Grand Avenue to provide a 50-foot wide one-half street. The General Plan classifies Grand Avenue as a major traffic corridor, with a laO-foot right-of-way and a 76- foot roadway (curb-to-curb). 29. Construct curb and gutter 38 feet from centerline, paving to City standards, and 6-foot sidewalk on Grand Avenue adjacent to curb. Some paving exists and must be replaced to City standards unless tests supplied by applicant show that existing paving is to City standards and will resist traffic loads represented by the City Engineer's traffic index of 8.0. 30. Construct 12-foot wide median in Grand Avenue of the length and extent approved by the City Engineer. Bond for future construction ~ of remainder of median which cannot presently be constructed because of existing width limitations. Provide median p1antings and improvement required by the City with automatic irrigation system. Provide pavement resurfacing on the northeast side of Grand Avenue centerline and approach transitions for safety and paving widening and improvement as required by the City Engineer for a safe median and left turn facility. 31. Provide a Grand Avenue centerline profile and calculation for safe vertical sight distance on Grand Avenue for the "C" Street connec- tion into Grand Avenue. Provide a recommendation from a registered Traffic Engineer. - o o (1) w CD <[ - - 2~1 Page nine City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISED. - Continued 32. Extention of Quail Knoll Road to the northwest shall match existing right-of-way and roadway. 33. Streets IICII and liE" extend to the Tract boundary at the west corner of this proposed development. The location of these streets termina- tions at the Tract boundary may require adjustment to satisfy develop- ment requirements of adjacent owner. This will be resolved during plan checking. A drainage release must be acquired from the owner at the northwest end of Street IIEII. 34. Construct sidewalks adjacent to curb on all streets with the width as shown on the Tentative Map. 35. Construct curb, gutter and paving on all proposed streets to the specifications of the City Engineer. Roadway (curb-to-curb) width shall be as shown on the Tentative Map. 36. Street plans and specifications to be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and will include signing and striping. As built street, grading, utility and drainage improvement plans are required. 37. Consent to sign an agreement to pay Traffic Safety Mitigation fee for future traffic signalization in the amount of $225.00 per lot. 38. Public improvements to conform with City Code requirements and City approved Riverside County Standard Drawings and Specifications. 39. Install ornamental street lighting as approved by City Engineer. a. Cooperate with the City in forming a Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 40. Provide Class II or equivalent bike lane on Grand Avenue as approved by the City Engineer. 41. Provide Grand Avenue street widening and street furniture for City Engineer approved transit facilities. All grading must conform to City Ordinance No. 636 and the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70. 42. Provide Soils and Geology Report including street design recommenda- tions. Provide Final Soils Report showing compliance with preliminary report and finish grade certification. Provide landscaping and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, including irrigation for street trees. Street trees shall be of the type and spacing approved by the City Engineer. Trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon size. 45. Provide grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. All property lines shall be at the top of construction slopes with the required Uniform Building Code setback requirements. 43. 44. 46. Comply with written requirements of Riverside County Flood Control District, and additional or alternative requirements of the City Engineer and the City Code. The City Engineer shall judge as to interpretation and application of flood control recommendations. See Flood Control letter dated 2-13-85. 47. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies, necessary master plan- ning and detailed plans and profiles of the proposed Flood Control facilities to Riverside County Flood Control District and to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final Map recordation. Provide drainage easements as required by the City Engineer. 222 Page ten City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISED. 48. Provision must be made to collect and convey hillside storm water run-off through the lots southwesterly of Street "F". Drains and easements must be provided as required by the City Engineer. Irrevocable offers of dedication must be given to the City. The City will not accept the easements. The Final Map must show the drainage easements with a prominent note stating owner or homeowner association responsibility for maintenance. - 49. The storm drainage generated from the watershed area westerly of the open space hill area identified as lot 175, shall be diverted to the master planned Ortega Channel. This Ortega Channel shall be constructed ENTIRELY OF CONCRETE, by this developer, coordinated with Riverside County Flood Control District and the City, to receive this diverted flow. If this is not acceptable to the developer, project should come back to Council prior to approval of the final map. The developer shall construct this Ortega Channel to and across Ortega Highway, and thence along the planned alignment, across Grand Avenue to the existing Ortega Channel, which presently terminates northeasterly of Grand Avenue between Macy Street and Ortega Highway. The Ortega Channel shall be constructed to its master planned size and alignment v/ith provision for receiving flow from all watershed areas which are tributary. The developer is expected to obtain right-of-way and financial participation from downstream property owners. The developer must complete an agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control District for construc- tion of this Ortega Channel to Flood Control standards for the ownership and maintenance of Riverside County Flood Control. The City of lake Elsinore will consider providing a reimbursement agreement to developer to allow him to recover a portion of the cost of the Ortega Channel. 50. Where "H" Street intersects "G" Street at the southeast corner of this Tract, a drainage easement is shown. A drainage release must be obtained from the adjacent property owner in order to concentrate the drainage, or alternate drainage plan approved by the City Engineer. - 51. Consent to sign an agreement to pay a Storm Drainage Impact Mitigation fee of $250.00 per lot to provide drainage facilities from Grand Avenue to the lake. Storm drainage run-off from the site discharges southeasterly to a low area in Grand Avenue near Butterfield School, and there is presently no drainage outlet from this low area to the lake. At the northwest end of Street "E", obtain drainage release from adjacent owner or provide alternate method of drainage disposal. 52. Comply with the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, County Health Department and California Regional Water Quality Control Board in providing sewer service so that connection can be made to the Regional Sewage System. Install cleanouts at property line on all sewer laterals as required by the City and/or Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. It must be acknowledged that maintenance of the sewer lateral from the sewer main to the property line is the responsibility of the property owner or Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 53. Provide a will serve letter guaranteeing water service from the serving agency. 54. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of lake Elsinore or its assignee. - 55. Meet all written requirements of Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection. 56. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement Fund fees per Ordinance No. 572. 57. Pay all sewer fees per Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District's schedule. 223 Page eleven City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. - 34. Tentative Tract Map 19358 REVISED - Continued. 58. Pay all Public Safety fees (police and fire) per Resolution No. 83-87. 59. Pay all School fees. 60. Consent to sign an agreement to pay a Traffic Safety Impact Mitigation Fee for the Lakeshore Drive/Mission Trail Bridge replacement per General Plan Circulation Element. The fee shall be based on benefit as determined in connection with a proposed assessment proceeding to construct the bridge. This developer shall bond or provide a guarantee to the City that a fee of one-hundred-fifty dollars ($150.00) per living unit be paid. They also agree to enter into an assessment district for the replace- ment of the bridge, and if the assessment district fails, they are then required to pay $150.00 maximum per unit. o o (Y) w CD <t 61. Prior to Final Map recordation, a subdivision agreement shall be entered into with the developer(s), owner(s) and the City. 62. Final Map shall show the following items with a prominent note: a. All geologic fault lines. b. Areas subject to flood hazards. - c. Formal warning to buyers through deed restrictions, that the area is subject to flood hazard. 63. Developer to participate in a Community Facilities District to be formed under the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to pay for the cost of fire, police, parks and flood control through the annual levy and collection of a special tax within the project area. AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NOES: VERMILLION MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED TO CERTIFY THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL H1PACT REPORT IS IN COt1PLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIR- ONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND STATE EIR GUIDELINES. AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NOES: VERMILLION - 35. Conditional Use Permit 85-1 - Michael Maltby - Proposal to convert an existing single-family residence into a pre-school center. Mayor Valenzuela opened the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. and asked staff to identify the project and give staff recommendations. Mr. Corcoran reported that Conditional Use Permit 85-1 is a proposal to convert a single-family residence into a pre-school center, located approximately ninety (90) feet northwesterly of Riverside Drive and Richard Street. Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 85-1, subject to forty-one (41) conditions with modifications. Mr. Corcoran also stated that a request has been submitted by Riverside County Fire Department asking that this matter be continued in order to allow that agency time to review the project. The City Clerk reported no additional written comments or protests. Mayor Valenzuela asked those in favor of Conditional Use Permit 85-1 to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Dick Murphy, 29362 Swan Avenue, Lake Elsinore, stated that the applicant has worked extensively with city staff, purchased adjacent property for additional play area for students, complied with all the require- ments and revised plans to reflect staff's concerns. He urged Council 224 Page twelve City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued. 35. Conditional Use Permit 85-1 - Michael Maltby - Continued. to approve the project. 2. Pat Maltby, applicant, reviewed the revised plans for the project showing changes in parking area and enlarged playground. She commented that they had contacted Caltrans regarding condition ... number 40 requiring "Slow - School Zone" flashing signs be erected, and found that Caltrans would not permit this type of sign. She does not feel that all conditions can be met prior to occupancy. 3. Michael Maltby, applicant, stated they are willing to work with Cal- trans, the Fire Department and staff to make the project acceptable. 4. Billie Hoffer, 637 Parkview Drive, Lake Elsinore, commented that she feels this project would be good for the City. Mayor Valenzuela asked those in opposition to Conditional Use Permit 85-1 to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Linda Crane, 17359 Shrier Drive, Lake Elsinore, lives directly behind the proposed project and feels there is too much traffic to allow for the number of students requested. Mayor Valenzuela closed the public hearing at 9:34 p.m. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING OF CONDITIONAL ~SE PERMIT 85-1 TO APRIL 23, 1985. COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO APPEALS BOARD AT 9:35 P.M. COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:49 P.M. BUSINESS ITEt~S ... 51. Ordinance No. 742 - Regulating the Placement to Satellite Dish Antennae within Residential Zones of the City of Lake Elsinore - First Reading. Mr. Molendyk requested this item be continued to the next joint study session of City Council and Planning Commission, scheduled for review of Title 17. MOVED BY KNIGHT, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER 742 TO DATE SET FOR NEXT JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/ CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION. 52. Ordinance No. 743 - Requiring all Members of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission to be Residents of the City of Lake Elsinore - Second Reading. ORDINANCE NO. 743 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING A PORTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 539, SECTION 2, AND AMENDING SECTION 2.24.020 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE, REQUIRING ALL MEMBERS OF THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELS I NORE. ..., MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY MATSON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 743, UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA NOES: NONE 53. Ordinance No. 744 - Revision to 100-Year Flood Plain Elevation of Ordinance Number 603 - First Reading. - o o (Y) w CD <C - - 225 Page thirteen City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1 985 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 53. Ordinance No. 744 - Continued. ORDINANCE NO. 744 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING NEW DEVELOPMENT, ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS OF RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES BELOW THE REGULATORY 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION OF 1267 FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY KNIGHT TO APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 744. Council discussion followed. Due to confusion regarding correct elevations for residential, industrial and commercial, Mr. Mo1endyk suggested this matter be continued to allow the City Engineer to research and eliminate any ambiguity between ordinances. MR. STRIGOTTE RECINDED ORIGINAL MOTION. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER AND RETURN TO STAFF FOR REVIEW. AYES: NONE: ABSTAIN: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA NONE VERMILLION 54. Industrial Project 85-1 - Terry Shook - Proposal to Construct 11,280 Square Foot Concrete Block Building on 1.5 -Acres for Light Manufacturing and Warehousing. Mr. Corcoran reported that Industrial Project 85-1 is a project proposing to construct an 11,280 square foot concrete block building on 1.5 Acres for light manufacturing and warehousing, located on south side of Flint Street between Mohr and Silver Streets. Planning Commission recommends approval of this project subject to thirty-four conditions with recommenda- tions. Mr. Mo1endyk read a letter received from Mr. Robert Williams which stated that Planning Commission minutes were in error and he asked to clarify that the applicants have agreed to pay one-half the cost of the water line based upon the front footage of the project property. Mr. Corcoran concurred that this was the intent of the Planning Commission. Council discussion followed regarding condition numbers 19, 24, 27 and 31. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 85-1, SUBJECT TO PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS AND COUNCIL AMENDMENTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Applicant shall plant one (1) five (5) gallon tree for every ten (10) parking spaces. 2. P1antings within ten feet (10') of all ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches (36"). 3. Signage for the entire project shall be coordinated and approved by Planning Division. 4. Applicant shall submit a Lighting Plan showing radii and the specific type of ornamental light to be used, to be approved by Planning Division. 5. Low level lighting shall be used at all entrances and exits: 6. All on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto the neighboring streets. 226 Page fourteen City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 54. Industrial Project 85-1 - Terry Shook - Continued. 7. All roof mounted or ground support equipment and trash areas are to be architecturally screened. 8. Developer is to record appropriate CC & R's for: a. Assuring uniform maintenance of appearance of all structures. b. Maintenance of all landscaping areas. c. Coordinating all signage and lighting. 9. All street trees should be a minimum of 30 feet apart, that way they can go in the right-of-way, and a Landscape Maintenance Agreement be entered into with the City and an easement be recorded on that property as approved by the City Engineer, if they are in the right- of-way. 10. A permanent automatic sprinkler and drip irrigation system shall be installed by applicant. 11. Applicant shall submit a Landscaping Plan, to be approved by Planning Division. 12. Perimeter striping shall be included as indicated on elevations. 13. Trash receptacles shall be located at rear of building in recessed corners, screened from views on Flint Street. 14. Issuance of a Negative Declaration~ 15. Applicant shall provide a centrally located loading/unloading area as required per Title 17, Section 55.050 B.8.b. 16. Applicant shall include a provision requiring that Title 17, Parking requirements be met when a change in occupancy occurs. Parking requirements shall be met before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued and this provision be recorded on the property. 17. Uses within the proposed project shall be limited to light manufacturing and warehousing. Any storage or use of noxious or hazardous chemicals shall require Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of Occupancy/Business License. 18. No outside storage shall be allowed. 19. Meet all City Codes and Ordinances. 20. Meet all County Fire Department requirements. 21. Meet all County Health Department requirements. 22. When Walnut Street is vacated, it shall be paved and used for fire access circulation and/or parking. 23. Improve Flint Street from Davis to the east boundary of Phase I (Lot 26), Mohr Street to the Centerline of Walnut Street, and eliminate Silver Street and Walnut Street until further phases. 24. Install water line extension with necessary appurtenances from Pottery Street and Davis Street and along Flint Street to Silver Street to provide domestic and fire flow as required by the City Engineer. Provide waterline extensions along Flint Street and Walnut as required by the City. Provide fire hydrant and other fire protection measures as required in writing by the County Fire Department. This extension should be a joint project with the industrial development on the northerly side of Flint Street. Applicant to pay for waterline extension for one half of the front footage of his property. Pay water fees which are effective at date of building permit issuance. - ~ '-" 227 Page fifteen City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. ~ 54. Industrial Project 85-1 - Terry Shook - Continued. 25. Process a lot merger, as required by City Engineer. 26. Street plans and specifications to be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and will include signing and striping. As built street, grading, utility and drainage improvement plans are required. Public improvements are to conform with City Code requirements and City approved Riverside County Standard Drawings and Specifications. 27. Applicant to participate in formation of a Mello Roos Community Facilities District to be formed under the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to pay for the cost of fire, police and flood control services, through the annual levy and collection of a special tax within the project area. Project area to be included within a district to be formed under the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972, to pay for the annual cost of lighting and landscaping which benefits the project through the levy and collection of an annual assessment. o o M W m ~ 28. All grading must conform to City Ordinance No. 636, the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, if applicable. 29. Provide grading and drainage plan and Certificate of Survey prepared by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Grading and street construction beyond limits of project may be required by the City Engineer for drainage. ~ 30. Provide landscaping and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, including street trees. 31. Comply with the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District,. County Health Department and California Regional Water Quality Control Board in providing sewer service so that connection can be made to the Regional Sewage System. Install clean-outs at property line on all sewer laterals as required by the City and/ or Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Pay required fees. 32. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its assignees. 33. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement fees per Ordinance No. 572 and Resolution 77-39, at building permit stage. 34. Pay Public Safety fees per Resolution No. 83-87. 55. Annual Review of Conditional Use Permit 83-10 - Josephine Geloso/Barbara Battrell - Proposal for the Business Continuance of an Automobile Repair Operation on the Southwest Corner of Railroad Avenue and Marian Street. Mr. Corcoran reported that on September 27, 1983, CUP 83-10 was approved -- by City Council subject to specific conditions. As of this date, ten of those original conditions have not been complied with. Staff recommends applicant comply with remaining original conditions as well as additional requirements. Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 83-10 subject to nineteen conditions modified conditions as follows. Council discussed the location of the project, inside the lake perimeter, adjacent to residential properties, parking, deferral of improvements and length of time allowed for compliance with conditions. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10, SUBJECT TO NINETEEN PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS WITH MODIFICATIONS, TO BE COMPLIED WITH WITHIN ONE-HUNDRED- TWENTY (120) DAYS FROM APRIL 9, 1985, ALL NON-OPERABLE VEHICLES TO BE STORED INSIDE FENCE, NOT ON STREET, AND CONDITION NUMBER SIXTEEN (16) AMENDED BY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: 228 Page sixteen City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 55. Annual Review of Conditional Use Permit 83-10 - Josephine Geloso/Barbara Battrell - Continued. 1. Applicant to remove debris from the site not normally associated with automobile repair. 2. Applicant to provide two (2) parking spaces on site, along the ___ Marian Street corridor, subject to the approval by Planning Division. 3. Applicant to pay all Public Safety fees. 4. Applicant to meet County of Riverside Fire Department recommendation. 5. Applicant shall dedicate 20 feet of additional right-of-way for Lakeshore Drive in conformance with the General Plan. 6. Applicant to install street improvements to the centerline on Lakeshore Drive to City standards and Code requirements. The improvements on Lakeshore Drive to be deferred until the installation and placement of the sewer line on Lakeshore Drive, and the improvements to be bonded. 7. Plans for public improvements shall be prepared by applicant's registered Civil Engineer. 8. Legal description for 20-foot dedication shall be prepared by app1icant's Engineers and verified by City Engineer. Deed and Title Report shall be supplied to City Engineer. 9. Applicant to meet the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board's requirements for subsurface sewage disposal. ... 10. The applicant is to construct a 42-inch (42") decorative block wall integrated with landscaping, and gated configuration along Marian Street and Lakeshore Drive, subject to approval by Planning Division. 11. All trash receptacles shall be screened and approved by the Planning Division. 12. All roof or ground support equipment incidental to the use shall be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. 13. Applicant is to re-paint existing building, color to be approved by Planning Division, and perform general rehabilitation, if applicable to the subject structure, as determined by the Building and Planning Division. 14. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be incorporated along the perimeter of the recommended wall design, to be approved by the Planning Division. 15. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its assignees. 16. Applicant to participate in formation of a Mello Roos Community Facilities ... District to be formed under the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to pay for the cost of fire, police and flood control services, through the annual levy and collection of a special tax within the project area. Project area to be included within a district to be formed under the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972, to pay for the annual cost of lighting and landscaping which benefits the project through the levy and collection of an annual assessment. 17. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement fees per Ordinance No. 572, if building permits or other permits are required. 18. Applicant is to meet all conditions within 120 days of approval. ~ o o M W m ~ ---- ---- 229 Page seventeen City Council Minutes April 9, 1985 BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued. 55. Annual Review of Conditional Use Permit 83-10 - Josephine Geloso/Barbara Battrell - Continued. 19. One year review period. 56. Vasquez Agreement - City Park Concession. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY MATSON AND CARRIED TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER FOR FURTHER STUDY AND EVALUATION. AYES: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA NOES: KNIGHT ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 12. Railroad Canyon Road - Progress Report MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED TO COMMENCE PAVING RAILROAD CANYON ROAD WITHIN TWO WEEKS. AYES: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA NOES: KNIGHT CITY MANAGER COMMENTS The City Clerk requested Council direction regarding the possibility of election consolidation with the County of Riverside. Council consensus was to direct the City Clerk to prepare a full report and bring back recommendations on the April 23, 1985 agenda. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Mr. Knight requested that, in the future, rather than using a total number of days when referring to deadlines, we should use the exact date. This would make follow-up more efficient. Mr. Strigotte announced that he attended a joint County/Western Cities meeting recently. These meetings will be held quarterly in an effort to open communication between cities and the county. Lake Elsinore will be hosting the next meeting, scheduled for June 26, 1985 from 7:30 to 9:00 p.m. at the Womens Club on Graham Avenue. He urged all Councilmembers and City officers to attend. The meeting will address economic development and discussion of ways to attract industry into the Western County. Mr. Strigotte requested Council authorization to expend necessary funds in preparation for this meeting. Council concurred. Mayor Valenzuela stated she has received several letters from cities in California regarding AB 724, the Campbell Bill. She read a letter from Rosemead, California, stating that AB 724 proposes to change the sales tax distribution guidelines which have been in effect for many years. It would benefit one jurisdiction at the expense of other jurisdictions. Cities have invested tremendous time and effort in establishing a sales tax base using the current Bradley/Burns uniform local sales and use tax law. Changing the rules abruptly would have serious repercussions. Ctties benefiting most from AB 724 are industrial cities which already have a high sales tax base and low population. The problem would be better solved through negotiations between the involved parties rather than through legislation. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY MATSON. AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT 10:37 P.M. 230 Page eighteen City Council Minutes Apri 1 9, 1985 ATTEST: ~~)U J NN MONEY, CITY CL~ C Y OF LAKE ELSINORE ARTA VALENZUELA, MAYO CITY OF LAKE ELSINO - - -