The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-29-1986 Adjourned CC/RDA Meeting -- f' 3. LD C\I W en <t - 157 MINUTES ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1986 *********************************************************************** 1. CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting was called to order by Mayor Strigotte at 6:30 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Washburn. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER STRIGOTTE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BROWN, MELLINGER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CALLAHAN, KELLEY Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, Community Development Director Miller, Public Services Director Kirchner and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. 4. BUSINESS MATTERS Due to the absence of the Consultant, Redevelopment Agency Annexation Process item "A" was continued. B. Title 17 1) PUD/Priority of Sections. Priority of projects were set in the following order: 1. Special Events 2. Flood Prone Overlay 3. Planned Unit Development 4. Central Business District 5. Hillside Planned Development Overlay 6. Lakeshore Overlay 7. Country Club Heights (Area Plan in General Plan General Objectives and Goals) 8. Antennas Mr. Miller suggested that a Study Session be set between the Planning Commission and the City Council to discuss the Special Events Ordinance. All members concurred. No date was designated. fS~U;~~d Council/RDA Minutes October 29, 1986 B. Title 17 - continued. 2) General Plan Policy (Up-Date) Commissioner Mellinger reported that the General Plan needs revision and suggested that Design Guidelines be implemented and zoning for future annexations be addressed. It was the consensus of the Council that the Planning commission bring back the items from the General Plan that they would like to see revised. 3) SUbdivision/Lot compatibility Mr. Matson stated that there is still a problem with lot compatibility. He stated that he thought no lot size would be less than 75% of the adjacent lot and that this policy had been implemented in Title 17. Mr. Miller stated that he has tentatively scheduled an amendment for consideration to the R-l District, which is the minimum 6,000 square foot, average 7,260 square foot lots. This will be presented to the December 2, Planning Commission Meeting for a recommendation to help solve some of the lot transition problems. - Mr. Strigotte stated that if its not compatible than Planning Commission should turn it down, and he was under the impression that it had already been decided that there was a decision of 75% of the adjacent lot. He stated that he thought that as the lots went out farther from the core of the city that the lots would get larger and larger. He stated that he had given up on the ban zoning idea in lieu of the 75% lot transition, which was agreed by Council at that time. Mr. Winkler stated that he was not under the impression that the 75% of the adjacent lot was a firm pOlicy. He stated that he understood it to be a concept to be brought back to Council. .... Mr. Strigotte stated that decisions are taken down by staff and it should have been noted in the minutes in regard to the lot compatibility policy set by Council. There was general discussion in regard to Transitional Lot Development. Mr. Miller was directed to draft a report to address this item. Mr. Mellinger suggested that this should be placed as a General Plan Amendment Policy Revision and implemented by the Zoning Code. Mayor strigotte called for item "A" to be presented at this time. A. Redevelopment Aqency Annexation Process Mr. Dick Hill, Consultant representing Management Services Institute, presented a Flow Chart and presentation in explanation of the Redevelopment Agency Annexation Process. C. Desiqn Review Development Issues - 1) Design Guidelines Mr. Mellinger presented Community Design Guidelines for the developer to use as a tool to place plans with the City for approval. These Guidelines were developed by the Design Review Subcommittee. Mr. Mellinger asked the Council to review the Guidelines and give in-put to staff for possible final draft. 159 Page three Adjourned council/RDA Minutes October 29, 1986 C. Desiqn Review Development Issues - continued. - 2) Development/Land Use Impacts (Traffic, Flood Control, etc.) Mr. Washburn introduced the problems with Traffic Circulation and Flood Control. There was considerable discussion in regard to traffic impact on various areas of the City and Flood Control problems including the San Jacinto River bridge. ~ to ~ W CD <( Mr. strigotte questioned the Negative Declarations and asked the Planning Commissioners to give closer inspection to Negative Declaration items. D. Council/Planninq Commission These items were deleted from the Agenda. 5. GENERAL COMMENTS A Study Session was set between the City Council and the Planning Commission for January 8, 1987 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. - 6. ADJOURNMENT -- The Adjourned City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, -