Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-14-1986 City Council Minutes 118 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1986 ****************************************************************************~~ CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Strigotte at.7:00 p.m. - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Dominguez. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Mo1endyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Barrick, Associate Planner Bolland, Public Services Director Kirchner, and City Clerk Oliver. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Vivian Rader, 164 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, stated that the senior citizens would like permission to decorate the Community Center for Halloween and other appropriate holidays. Staff will .J fOllow-up and work with Mrs. Rader. 2. Dennis Rourke, 31360 Riverside Drive, Lake Elsinore, commented on the Christmas display which he and his family would like to present again this year on their property on Riverside Drive. He requested assistance from the City Council to resolve traffic problems. 3. Marsha Swanson, 35050 Orange Street, Wi1domar, representing the Lake Elsinore Valley Board of Realtors, requested the city participate in the Christmas Can Tree Drive by allowing a can tree to be placed in the City Council Chamber. CEREMONIALS 1. Mayor Strigotte presented Proclamations and awarded inscribed City of Lake Elsinore tiles for Community Service on the City Council and the Planning commission, to: A. Arta Valenzuela B. Larry Knight C. Hilda Barnhart D. Fred Dominguez E. Bill Saathoff ....." 2. Mayor Strigotte presented a Proclamation honoring Pau::' 'J.'u~ler for his Eagle Scout project. 3. Albert Wilsey made a presentation regarding the Flood Contrn1 Bond Issue on the November 4, 1986 ballot. He introduced Dave Zappy of the Riverside County Flood Control District who gave a narration and slide presentation. Supervisor Wa1~ Abraham thanked Mr. Wilsey for his efforts on behalf of tL~ Flood Control proj ect and urged everyone to vote yes on Proposi tic:", ~. Page two City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 119 CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further consideration and discussion: Items No. 10 and 16c. - MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. l. The following Minutes were approved: a. September 23, 1986 - Regular City Council Meeting b. September 23, 1986 - Board of Appeals Meeting The following Minutes were received and filed: I"- c. September 16, 1986 - Planning Commission Meeting L!1 C\J d. September 16, 1986 - Design Review Board Meeting W CD 2 . Received and filed Building Division Monthly Activity Report - <t September, 1986. - 3. Received and filed Treasurer's Monthly Report - September, 1986. 4. Ratified Warrant List for the Month of September, 1986 in the total amount of Two-Hundred-Eighty-Five-Thousand-Three-Hundred-Seventeen Dollars and Thirty-Five Cents ($285,317.35). 5. Approved additions to the Council Policy Manual and adopted the following Resolutions: a. Resolution No. 86-66 - Adopting Council Policy Number 100-2, Code of Ethics. RESOLUTION NO. 86-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER 100-2, CODE OF ETHICS. b. Resolution No. 86-67 - Adopting Council Policy Number 100-3, Racial Discrimination. RESOLUTION NO. 86-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER 100-3, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION. - c. Resolution No. 86-68 - Adopting Council Policy Number 100-7, City Council Meeting Tapes. RESOLUTION NO. 86-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER 100-7, CITY COUNCIL MEETING TAPES. l~ge three City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued. 5. Additions to Council Policy Manual - Continued. d. Resolution No. 86-69 - Amending Council Policy Number 200-1, City Council Meeting Rules and Procedures. RESOLUTION NO. 86-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86-33 AND COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER 200-1, REGULATING CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AND PROCEDURES. ..., e. Resolution No. 86-70 - Adopting Council Policy Number 200-2, regarding Open Meetings - The Brown Act. RESOLUTION NO. 86-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER 200-2, REGARDING OPEN MEETINGS - THE BROWN ACT. 6. Adopted Resolution No. 86-71 - Designating a Redevelopment survey area within the City. RESOLUTION NO. 86-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING A REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA FOR STUDY PURPOSES. 7. Adopted Resolution No. 86-72 - Establishing annual General Plan Amendment hearing dates. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 86-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT HEARING DATES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 85-50. 8. Adopted Resolution No. 86-74 - Amending budget for fiscal year 1986/87, to fund expenditures for improvements to the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Robb Road. RESOLUTION NO. 86-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986/87. 9. Awarded contract for Furnishing and Placing Asphalt Concrete Products to Fontana Paving, Inc. 11. Accepted Final Parcel Map No. 17616 - California Property Exchange Eleven (11) acre subdivision east of San Jacinto River, west of Railroad Canyon Road, north of I-15, and directed the City Clerk to sign and record final map. ..., 12. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights - Commercial Project No. 86-5, at Mission Trail and Railroad Canyon Road South, and authorized the City Clerk to record said document. 13. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights - Dura Construction 114 - 116 Chestnut Street, and authorized the City Clerk to record said document. - I"- Lf) C\I W CD <I: - - Page four City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 121 CONSENT CALENDAR - continued. 14. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights - Robert Gilman - 16490 Stevens Avenue, and authorized the City Clerk to record said document. 15. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights - P.U.D. 84-1 (Phase 11)- Jim Thompson, and authorized the City Clerk to record said document. 16. Set date of October 28, 1986 for public hearing of: a. Tentative Parcel Map 21773 Revised - A request to divide two (2) parcels of approximately one-half acre each into three (3) parcels of .3, .3 and 5 gross acres, located on the southwest corner of Machado Street and Larson Road - Robert Ciric. b. Tentative Parcel Map 21962 - Request to subdivide 18.03 acres into fourteen (14) parcels located on the west side of Mission Trail between Sylvester Street and Campbell Street - T & S Development. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Contract for Maintenance of Potted Street Trees in Downtown Area. Mr. Matson commented that at a recent Finance Committee meeting, Sheri Groth, President of the Downtown Business Association had indicated that perhaps business people could adopt the tree in front of their place of business and be responsible for its care and maintenance. This would relieve the City of the expense involved in the maintenance of these trees. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED TO TABLE THIS CONTRACT UNTIL THE CITY RECEIVES A RESPONSE FROM THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF BUSINESS PERSONS ADOPTING INDIVIDUAL TREES AND ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ 16c. Removed from Agenda. CHANGE IN ORDER OF AGENDA Mayor strigotte requested Business Item 54 be moved forward on the agenda and be heard at this time. 54. Industrial Project 86-1 - Norman Industries - Request to construct an 18,500 square foot office/warehouse building on a 4.53 acre site located at 32371 Corydon Road. Mr. Bolland gave an overview of the project and recommended Council adopt the findings listed below, adopt Negative Declaration 86-36 and approve Industrial Project 86-1 subject to thirty-three (33) conditions. Findinqs: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the current Zoning District in which the project is located. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 of the revised zoning code and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 12~e five City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 CHANGE OF AGENDA ORDER - Continued. 54. Industrial Pro;ect 86-1 - Continued. Findings: - Continued. 3 . Conditions and safeguards, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) and the planning district in which the site is located. - 4. Special circumstances, as indicated in the staff report, are present on the project site and in the proposed design which warrant approval of a metal building on this site. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-36 AND APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 86-1 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING THIRTY-THREE (33) CONDITIONS: 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. All project Conditions of Approval are to be met prior to Build- ing Division issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. These Conditions of Approval shall be attached or reproduced upon page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety. 4. All roof mounted equipment, trash areas, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view, __ subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 5. All signage shall be by City Permit, as approved by the Commu- nity Development Director. 6. All exterior on-site lighting shall be low pressure sodium and shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto neighboring property or streets. 7. Street trees shall be planted along Corydon Road to be selected from City Street Tree List, planted a maximum of 30 feet apart, and be a minimum of IS-gallon in size. 8. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans and/or as modified by Planning commission or Design Review Board. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the Design Review Board. 9. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic irrigation system with 100% watering coverage. 10. A Final Landscaping/Irrigation Plan is to be approved by the Director of Community Development. 11. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a -- six-inch (6") high concrete curb. 12. Plantings within ten feet (10') of the ingress/egress point shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). 13. The on-site trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. Page six City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 123 CHANGE OF AGENDA ORDER - continued. 54. Industrial Prolect 86-1 - continued. 14. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire pro- tection. - I"- U) C\J W en c:x: 15. 16. - 17. a) The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance - 546. b) A fire flow of 1500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. c) Install a complete fire sprinkler system. The post indi- cator valve and Fire Department connection shall be loca- ted to the front, (within 50 feet of a hydrant), and a minimum of 25 feet from the buildings. d) Install a fire alarm system as required by the Uniform Building Code, section 3803 for the sprinkler system. e) Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. All required off-site improvements shall be completed prior to release of utilities and issuance of certificate of Occupancy. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. All project slopes are not to exceed a maximum of 2:1 finished slopes and are to be treated with appropriate erosion control vegetational growth as proposed in the detailed Landscape Plan and approved by the Design Review Board. 18. A precise grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief Building Official. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken thirty (30) days after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building Official. 19. The project shall connect to sewer within 30 days following service availability. 20. Meet the requirements of Riverside County Health Department. 21. Meet the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 22. The Final Landscape Plan shall indicate the following modifi- cations to be approved by the Director of Community Development: - a) A landscape buffer consisting of densely spaced evergreen trees shall be planted along west property line between the water meter location and driveway gate to help reduce the impacts of loading dock activities on the adjacent R.V. Park. b) Additional trees, selected for vertical growth habitat, shall be placed in clumps adjacent to the building. c) Shrubs or vines shall be planted for coverage of existing chain link fence along Corydon Road. d) Foundation shrubs shall be planted along the east (Corydon Road) elevation where metal wall panels are located. (CLARIFICATION OF CONDITION NUMBER 22: THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE SOME TREES SIMILAR TO WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION, AT LEAST IN THE RENDERING, ALONG THE NORTH- SOUTH ELEVATION.) 12~e seven City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 CHANGE OF AGENDA ORDER - Continued. 54. Industrial proiect 86-1 - continued. 23. The new row of parking stalls shall be separated from the existing building by a planter bed a minimum of five feet (5') in width which shall be incorporated into the Final Landscaping Plan. The existing mobile caretaker's residence and greenhouses shall be landscaped to screen these structures from Corydon Road. 24. - 25. The design and construction of this structure shall be certified by the project engineer as meeting "near source event" seismic criteria, which shall be placed as a note on building plans. 26. Standard sidewalk shall be installed along Corydon Road and meet the approval of the City Engineer. 27. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 28. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding pUblic improvements for build- ings and subdivisions. 29. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code) regarding grading. 30. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. 31. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding Capi- tal Improvement fees and engineering plan check fees for other than subdivisions. - 32. Meet all requirements of Resolution on 83-12 regarding in- stallation of improvements as a condition of building permits. 33. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 32. Zone Change 86-13 - Realty Center - Request to rezone approximately 0.57 acres of land from R-3, High-Density Residential, to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, at the southwest corner of Riverside Drive and Lash Avenue. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. and asked staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland reported that the pro- posed Zone Change would bring the zoning into conformance with the existing General Plan designation of Neighborhood Commercial. Staff recommends Council adopt the findings listed below, adopt Negative Declaration 86-41, approve Zone Change 86-13 and adopt Ordinance No. 776. Findinqs: ....., 1. The present zoning of R-3 (High-Density Residential) is not consistent with the General Plan designation of Neighborhood Commercial. 2. The proposed Zone Change from R-3 (High-Density Residential) to C-l (Neighborhood Commercial) is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. ..... ~ ~ N W m ~ ..... ~ Page eight City council Minutes October 14, 1986 125 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 32. Zone Chanqe 86-13 - continued. Findinqs: - continued. 3. The proposal has the potential to assist in encouraging com- mercial growth and to influence land use patterns that will result in creative jobs and strengthening the City's economic base with positive spillover effects to bolster other parts of the local economy. 4. The proposed zone change will facilitate compatibility of land uses within the City's General Plan, and bring portions of zoning designations in compliance with state planning law. 5. The proposed zone change will not have a significant impact on the environment. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte asked those in favor of Zone Change 86-13 to speak. No one asked to speak. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to Zone change 86-13 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:47 p.m. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-41, APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 86-13 AND APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 776, ORDINANCE NO. 776 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA REZONING 0.57 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND LASH AVENUE FROM R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 86-13 - REALTY CENTER). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 33. Zone Chanqe 86-11 - Terry Shook - Request to change zoning from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to CO (Commercial Office) on a 27,000 square foot site on south side of Flint Street between Davis and Mohr Streets. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. and asked staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland gave an overview of the project and commented that the zone change will bring this site into conformity with the General Plan and allow development of an office project. Staff recommends Council adopt the findings listed below, adopt Negative Declaration 86-23, approve Zone Change 86-11 and approve first reading of Ordinance No. 732 Findinqs: 1. This zone change will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed zone change or within the City. 2. The zone change will not be injurious to property or improve- ments in the neighborhood or within the city. 3. The zone change is consistent with the previous City Council action to approve the General Plan Land Use designation of Office/Professional for the subject site. Page nine 1~ty council Minutes October 14, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 4. The City is in the process of adopting Chapter 17.40, Commer- cial Office District, to implement the Office/Professional General Plan Land Use designation. 5. The Commercial Office (CO) Zoning District is applied to the subject site in expectation of imminent City Council action to adopt the text of Chapter 17.40, and that approval of Commercia Project 86-8 can be made contingent upon this action. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte asked those in favor of Zone Change 86-11 to speak. The following person spoke: 1. Terry Shook, 32910 Lillian, Lake Elsinore, requested a refund of Seven-Hundred Dollars ($700) in fees he paid for this zone change. He felt the City should have accomplished this zone change to comply with the General Plan. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to Zone Change 86-11 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. .... MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-23, APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 86-13 AND APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 773, ORDINANCE NO. 773 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO CO (COMMERCIAL-OFFICE) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 86-11 - TERRY SHOOK). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: .... AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 34. Conditional Exception Permit 86-8 - Terry Shook - Request to vary from rear yard setback standards of proposed CO (Commercial Office) Zoning District to allow office building ten feet from property line on the south side of Flint between Davis and Mohr Streets. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. and asked staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland gave an overview of the project and recommended Council adopt the findings and Negative Declaration 86-23 and approve Conditional Exception Permit 86-8 subject to two (2) conditions. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor strigotte asked those in favor of Conditional Exception 86-8 to speak. The following person spoke: 1. Terry Shook, 32910 Lillian, Lake Elsinore, urged Council apprOVI Conditional Exception Permit 86-8. __ Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to Conditional Exception Permit 86-8 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMDINGUEZ TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-23 AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 86-8 SUBJECT TO TWO (2) CONDITIONS. ..... ~ ~ N W m ~ ..... ..... Page ten City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 127 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 34. Conditional Exception Permit 86-8 - continued. Mayor strigotte stated he felt uncomfortable approving a variance until such time as he could see the proposed project. Council discussion followed. Councilmen Winkler and Dominguez withdrew the original motion and second. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 86-8 UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT IS HEARD. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON 35. General Plan Amendment 86-8 and Zone Chanqe 86-12 - Schmid Develop- ment - Request to change the General Plan designation from Limited Industrial to Commercial Manufacturing and to change the zoning from M-l, ManUfacturing, to C-M, Commercial ManUfacturing, on approximately 50.18 acres located between Collier Avenue and the freeway, from Nichols Road to approximately 1,700 feet west of Riverside Drive. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. asking staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland reported that the applicant has requested this change to facilitate a business park, which would expand the amount of area designated for Commercial Manufac- turing to provide a better balance within the community. Staff recommends Council adopt the findings, adopt Negative Declaration 86-40, approve General Plan Amendment 86-8 and Zone Change 86-12 and adopt first reading of Ordinance No. 777. Findinqs: 1. This Amendment is in accordance with the policy of the City of Lake Elsinore to establish a balance of land uses througout the community. 2. This Amendment would further the goal of the City of Lake Elsinore to encourage commercial areas at strategic points in the planning area. 3. This Amendment would encourage the kind of economic growth and devleopment which supplies jobs and economic self- sufficiency for existing and future residents. 4. This General Plan Amendment would not adversely affect the surrounding property with respect to value of precedent. 5. This Amendment is compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning. 6. This Amendment is compatible with the City's development pattern. 7. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment and issuance of a negative declaration. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte asked those in favor of General Plan Amendment 86-8 and Zone Change 86-12 to speak. The following person spoke: 1. Lou R. Schmid, President of Schmid Development, offered to answer any questions of Council. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to General Plan Amendment 86-8 and Zone Change 86-12 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m. l~ge eleven City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 35. General Plan Amendment 86~ and Zone Change 86-12 - Continued. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-40, APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-8 AND ZONE CHANGE 86-12 AND APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 777, ORDINANCE NO. 777 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 50.18 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF COLLIER AVENUE TO INTERSTATE 15, FROM NICHOLS ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 1700 FEET WEST OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE, FROM M-l (LIMITED MANUFACTURING) TO C-M (COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE-CHANGE 86-12 - SCHMID DEVELOP- MENT). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: .... AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 36. General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Chanqe 86-14 Revised - Preston Barrett - Request to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Mixed Use to High Density Residential and to change the zoning from C-l, Limited Commercial, and R-l, Single Family Residential, to R-3, High-Density Residential, on 1.93 acres located on the southwest and southeast corners of Graham Avenue and Lewis Street. Mayor Strigotte opened the pUblic hearing at 8:05 p.m. asking staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland reported the proposed __ changes are requested to facilitate construction of a 24-unit apartment project at the southwest corner of Graham Avenue and Lewis Street. Staff has recommended the inclusion of the existing sixteen-unit apartment project at the southeast corner of Graham and Lewis, in order to make both these projects conforming uses under the new Zoning Code. Staff recommends Council adopt the findings listed below and Negative Declaration 86-30, approve General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Change 86-14 Revised and approve first reading of Ordinance No. 778. Findings: 1. This General Plan Amendment would promote the General Plan pOlicies and objectives to provide a balance of various types of residential options supported by adequate services and facilities by providing for an opportunity for a quality urban density residential development close to existing urban services, transportation routes, schools, open space, and downtown com- mercial services. 2. This area is appropriate for higher density residential develop- ment due to the adequacy and availability of essential infra- structure and urban services. 3. The higher designation for subject property is compatible with __ surrounding land usage and would be appropriate. 4. This Amendment is compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning. 5. This Amendment will not adversely affect the surrounding pro- perty with respect to value or precedent. 6. There will be no significant impact upon the environment. Page twelve City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 129 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continued. 36. General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Change 86-14 Revised - Continued. The City Clerk read a letter from Ray E. Hull, 900 W. Graham Avenue Lake Elsinore, supporting this project. ' -- Mayor Strigotte asked those in favor of General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Change 86-14 Revised to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Larry Bivens, principal project engineer, representing the applilcant, stated the developer needs the twenty-four (24) unit yield in order to make the project feasible. He stressed it is a quality project and urged Council approval. 2. William Cook, 1006 Lakeshore, Lake Elsinore, supported the project and urged Council approval. ~ ~ N W m ~ 3. Barbara Ward, 100 South Lewis, Lake Elsinore, manager of the Lakeside Village project commented that she and the other resi- dents look forward to this new project and urged Council approval. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Change 86-14 Revised to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:13 p.m. Mr. Matson commented that he felt the property was better suited to 'Mixed Use' designation than 'High-Density Residential'. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-30, APPROVE GENERAL PLAN -- AMENDMENT 86-9 AND ZONE CHANGE 86-14 AND APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 778, ORDINANCE NO. 778 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 1.93 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LEWIS STREET BETWEEN GRAHAM AVENUE AND LAKESHORE DRIVE AND ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEWIS STREET AND GRAHAM AVENUE FROM R-l (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND C-l (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO R-3 (HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 86-14 REVISED - PRESTON BARRETT). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 86-75, MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN. RESOLUTION NO. 86-75 -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE THIRD CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1986. 37. Tentative Parcel Map 21587 - Schmid Development - Request to divide 40.76 acres into 53 Commercial Manufacturing lots, located between Collier Avenue and 1-15, extending easterly from approxi- mately one-thousand feet (1000') east of Nichols Road. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. asking staff to identify the project. Mr. Bolland gave an overview of the project and recommended Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 21587 subject to thirty-five conditions. 100ge thirteen c~ty Council Minutes October 14, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 37. Tentative Parcel Map 21587 - continued. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor strigotte asked those in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 21587 to speak. The following person spoke: 1. Lewis Schmid, President, Schmid Development commented that he was in favor of the project with conditions and would be available to answer any questions. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to Tentative Parcel Map 21587 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:21 p.m. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO AMEND CONDITIONS FOURTEEN (14), TWENTY-THREE (23) AND TWENTY-SIX (26). - MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 21587, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING THIRTY-FIVE (35) CONDITIONS, AS AMENDED: 1. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 2. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for build- 3. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code) regarding grading. 4. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. 5. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees for encroachment permits. -- 6. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 85-26 regarding engineering plan check and inspection fees for subdivisions, lot mergers, and lot line adjustments. 7. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-75 regarding fees for flood hazard review by Riverside County Flood Control District. 8. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529. 9. Applicant to dedicate right-of-way along Collier Avenue to pro- vide for ultimate 38 foot half street. All interior streets shall be as shown on approved tentative parcel map to consist of 66 foot right-of-way and 44 foot curb to curb. Collier Avenue is classified as a Modified Collector per City General Plan Circulation Element. 10. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 GPM and an actual fire flow available from anyone hydrant shall be 2000 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI _ residual operating pressure. 11. Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2-2-1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. ... .....,.. .,.".;, Page fourteen City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 131 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 37. Tentative Parcel Map 21587 - Continued. 12. Applicant shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet -- the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be approved by a registered civil engineer and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the require- ments prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department". 13. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. I"- U1 C\J W CD <t -- - 14. Developer shall present to Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, off-site sewer and water plans. 15. Developer shall coordinate with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District an agreement for connection fees for both water and sewer. 16. A "will-serve" letter shall be obtained and submitted to the City from agencies providing utilities to the project area. 17. Developer shall submit plans to the City for the drainage culvert to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Cal Trans. 18. All slopes within the project area shall be at a maximum slope of 2:1, however, 1-1/2:1 slopes may be permitted adjacent to the freeway provided they receive special land- scaping treatment including use of jute netting, subject to approval of the Community Development Director. 19. Finished floor elevations shall be at least 1 foot above the 100 year flood level, which is 1258.5 feet above m.s.l. 20. Applicant shall provide a drainage letter from downstream property owners accepting drainage or otherwise provide for drainage subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 21. Prior to recordation of map applicant shall annex this develop- ment into a street lighting and landscape maintenance district. 22. A Hydrology Study shall be completed and submitted addressing flows from culvert and additional flows generated for the approval of the City Engineer. 23. The preliminary Soil Investigation, completed in 1979 for the property shall be updated to meet the approval of the City Engineer. 24. Precise Grading and Drainage Plans shall be submitted for review and approval of the Chief Building Official and City Engineer. 25. Erosion control measures shall be provided along with grading Plans. 26. Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, entire project shall connect to sewer. 27. Access onto Collier Avenue from individual lots shall be limited as much as possible through the utilization of shared access agreements between adjoining lots and a emphasis access onto interior streets. l~ge fifteen UCity Council Minutes October 14, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 37. Tentative Tract Map 21587 - Continued. 28. Applicant shall complete an abandonment for the 34 foot wide strip area along the north side of Collier Avenue as denoted on Parcel Map. 29. Developer shall obtain permission and approval of the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game before wetland area is disturbed. 30. Developer shall make arrangements with Southern California Edison to eliminate interference with an easement that the proposed project could impact before any building permits are issued. .... 31. The Tentative Parcel Map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (L.E.M.C.), Title 16, unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. 32. This conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map will expire two (2) years after the City Council approval date, unless extended as provided by thye State of California Subdivision Map Act. 33. Prior to the Final Map recordation, provide to the satis- faction of the Community Development Director and Public Services Director written documentation that each appli- cable condition of approval has been fully met to the satisfaction of each agency and party responsible for the respective condition. 34. A note shall be placed on the Final Map which identifies this site's Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Zone designation and advises as to flood hazard which may be present in its unimproved condition. 35. That tree conservation plan, as indicated in the Envir- onmental Assessment, be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director. .... BOARD OF APPEALS City Council adjourned to the Board of Appeals at 8:24 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:25 p.m. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 51. Resolution No. 86-73 - Establishing Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) and designating Riverside County Transportation Commission as 'SAFE'. Mr. Ed Studor, Transportation Planner for Riverside County thanked the City Council for their action approving the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY .... TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 86-73 ESTABLISHING SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE) AND DESIGNATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS- PORTATION COMMISSION AS 'SAFE'. RESOLUTION NO. 86-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSLINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE) AND DESIGNATING RIVER- SIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AS 'SAFE'. ..... ~ ~ N W m ~ ..... ..... -* Page sixteen City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 133 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued. 51. Service Authority for Freeway Emerqencies (SAFE) - Continued. Council concurred to direct the City Clerk to write a letter to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and the Mayors and Councilman's Association, requesting that a member of the Lake Elsinore City Council be appointed to serve on the Board of Directors of SAFE. 52. Request for General Plan Map Clarification and Adjustment - Ruth Killian. Mr. Bolland reported that in 1982, prior to adoption of the General Plan, Mrs. Ruth Killian requested commercial designation for five acres which she owned north of I-15 and east of Main Street. A letter from the former City Manager indicates her request was deemed appropriate. Recently, however, Mrs. Killian discovered an apparent error in the General Plan which shows one of her lots still to be designated as Low Density Residential. Staff recommends the General Plan Land Use Map be adjusted to include both of Mrs. ~,llian's parcels as General Commercial designation, and the bounda~y to be along Granite Street north of the freeway. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE MRS. KILLIAN'S REQUEST TO ADJUST THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP TO INCLUDE HER ENTIRE FIVE ACRES AS GENERAL COMMERCIAL DESIG- NATION. 53. Conditional Exception Permit 86-9 - Atlantic Richfield - Appeal of denial by Planning Commission of a seventy foot (70') high freeway sign. Mr. Bolland reported that the applicant has requested a variance to allow for a seventy-foot (70') high sign with over two-hundred-fifty (250) square feet of sign area. State law indicates that variances to the Code shall be granted only due to physical limitations on the property which preclude strict application of the Zoning Ordi- nance and which deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. Signs on nearby properties are approxi- mately one-hundred-fifty (150) square feet in size and with a max- imum height of sixty feet (60'). Staff recommends Council adopt the findings below and deny Conditional Exception Permit 86-9. Findings: 1. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property which do not apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood. 2. The applicant's requested deviation from the Code is not nec- essary to fulfill the purposes of California Government Code Section 65906 and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17. 3. The applicant's requested deviation from the Code is not necessary to enable reasonable development of the property, given the fact that other commercial users along this corridor currently enjoy reasonable use of their property without the privilege of freeway advertising. Mr. Don Althouse, 9405 Sawtooth Way, San Diego, representing Atlantic Richfield, commented that over one-million dollars ($1,000,000) has been invested in the project and the developers feel the sign is necessary to attract business and bring a reasonable return on their investment. He urged Council approve the request. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND DENY APPEAL FOR SIGN VARIANCE BY ATLANTIC RICHFIELD. 134 Page seventeen City council Minutes October 14, 1986 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued. 55. Residential proiect 86-3 - Preston Barrett Corporation -,Request to construct a 24-unit apartment complex on a 1.1 acre s1te located at the southwest corner of Graham Avenue and Lewis Street. Mr. Bolland reported that processing of this project commenced prior to adoption of the new zoning code, and standards of the old code have been applied. Staff recommends Council adopt the findings adopt Negative Declaration 86-30 Revised and approve Residential Project 86-3 subject to forty-five (45) conditions. .... Findinqs: 1. All significant environmental impacts are mitigated through the design of the project. 2. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objec- tives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located, provided the recommended conditions of approval for a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment are met. 3. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 of the Revised Title 17 and all other appli- cable provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. Larry Bivins, representing Preston Barrett, commented that he was available to answer any questions Council may have. .... Councilman Matson expressed concerns regarding increased density. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO DELETE CONDITIONS 33 AND 42. MOVED BY MATSON TO DELAY ACTION ON RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 86-3 UNTIL IT CAN BE BROUGHT BACK AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Motion died for lack of second. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-30 AND APPROVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 86-3, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING FORTY-FIVE CONDITIONS, AS AMENDED: 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. All project conditions of approval are to be met prior to Building Division issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. All roof mounted equipment, trash areas, and ground support -- equipment shall be effectively screened from pUblic view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 4. All signage shall be by City Permit, and approved in conformance with the City Sign Ordinance. Page eighteen City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 135 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued. 55. Residential Prolect 86-3 - Continued. 5. All exterior on-site lighting shall be low pressure sodium and shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto -- neighboring property or streets. I'- 8. LD (\j W 9. CD <( 10. II. 12. - 6. Street trees shall be selected from city Street Tree List, planted a maximum of 30-feet apart, and be a minimum of 15 gallon in size. Perimeter fencing and walls shall be designed to accommodate existing Pepper Trees and new street trees. 7. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans and/or as modified by Planning Commission or Design Review Board. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the Planning Commission. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage. A final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and meet the approval of the Director of Communtty Development. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb. Plantings within ten-feet (10') the ingress/egress point shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). All garage parking spaces are to clearly identify individual parking spaces for tenants within the complex. To accomplish this, the spaces are to be numbered so as to correspond with the rental units, as approved by the Community Development Director. 13. The on-site trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director, with materials to match the facade of the residential building. 14. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire protection. a) A fire flow of 2500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. b) The required fire flow shall be available from a super hydrant, (6"x4"x2-1/2") located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along ap- proved vehicular travelways. c) The applicant/developer shall provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrants are either exist- ing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. d) Install portable fire extinguishers as per NFPA, Pamphlet #10. e) Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. 15. All required off-site improvements shall be completed prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for any units. 138ge nineteen city Council Minutes October 14, 1986 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued. 55. Residential Prolect 86-3 - continued. 16. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. Meet all requirements and the Lake Elsinore school overcrowding. Fees) . 18. All project slopes are not to exceed a maximum of 2:1 finished slopes and are to be treated with appropriate erosion control vegetational growth as proposed in the detailed Landscape Plan, and approved by the Design Review Board. of the Elsinore Union High School District Elementary School District to offset Meet City Ordinance No. 588 (School Impact 17. - 19. A precise grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief Building Official. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken thirty (30) days after rough grading, as ap- proved by the Chief Building Official. 20. The project shall connect to sewer. 21. Meet the requirements of Riverside County Health Department. 22. Meet the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 23. The mailboxes for the rental units on-site shall be archi- tecturally treated to soften the appearance of the hard edge "metal box" construction, with treatment to match the build- ing materials used in the development of the units, as ap- proved by the Community Development Director. 24. The applicant shall cause to be recorded a mutual access parking and maintenance easement on properties to permit perpetual shared vehicle access between all properties. ..... 25. Project approval is contingent upon final City approval of Zone Change 86-14 REVISED, Conditional Exception Permit 86-10 and 86-l0A REVISED, and General Plan Amendment 86-9. 26. A Lot Line Adjustment shall be obtained to reflect a proposal which avoids the necessity of rear yard variances unless such variances are obtained. 27. A six-foot (6') wrought iron and slumpstone pilaster fence shall be constructed along the northeast and south perimeters of the site and along the top of the retaining wall on the southwest corner of the site to a minimum distance of thirty feet (30') from Lakeshore Drive. This parameter fence/retain- ing wall shall be designed to incorporate street tree planters and shall require the approval of the Community Development Director. 28. The sidewalk transition along Lakeshore Drive shall be re- designed to provide for sufficient width and a smooth transition to meet the approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. ..... 29. The driveway entrance details shall be provided as indicated in revised submittal, with stamped concrete as shown in landscaping plan, and lighting to march entrance lighting of the completed project. 30. A landscape screen shall be provided adjacent to the swimming pool, utility building, parking stall area along the perimeter fence line. Page twenty City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 137 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - Continued. 55. Residential proiect 86-3 - Continued. 31. The finger parking lot planter south of the pool area shall incorporate a two foot (2') wide walkway and provide access to a gated entry to pool area, in addition to low shrub p1antings -- along its east side. 32. Trash enclosures shall be screened by appropriate landscaping to be incorporated into Final Landscape Plan. 33. DELETE. 34. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code). Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for buildings and subdivisions. 35. ~ ~ N 36. W m ~ 37. 38. 39. -- 40. 41. 42. 43. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code) regarding grading. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees for encroachment permits. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check fees for other than subdivisions. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding instal- lation of improvements as a condition of building permits. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529. DELETE. The applicant shall provide a hydrology study which addresses development of off-site drainage facilities to meet the ap- proval of the City Engineer. Appropriate drainage facilities shall be installed at the intersection of Lewis Street and Lakeshore Drive to conduct run-off across Lakeshore. The City will cooperate with the applicant to provide use of City pro- perty east of Lewis street for construction of drainage outflow facilities. All plans and facilities to be approved by the City Engineer and installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy or Release of utilities. 44. These conditions of approval shall be attached or reproduced upon page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety. 45. CC & R'S shall be approved by the Community Development Director including requirement for common maintenance and access to all common areas and amenities. ..... AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON 56. Disposition of Surplus city-Owned Property. Mr. Gilbert reported that this report was prepared at Council's request. He outlined the in-depth report and recommended Council authorize staff to proceed with Phase I of the project and direct staff to prepare recommendations to the Finance Committee and City Council regarding candidate properties for disposition. (Phase IIA). 1~ge twenty-one Clty Council Minutes October 14, 1986 BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued. 56. Disposition of Surplus city-Owned Property - continued. Consensus: Council concurred to defer any further work on this project to mid-year budget review. 57. Reauest to Purchase citY-Owned Property at Lakeshore and Silver. Mr. Gilbert reported that the City received a request from a local realtor who has a potential buyer for the subject property. Staff recommends Council deny request to purchase this property and establish a policy to retain all city-owned lakefront properties until such time as ultimate use of these properties is determined. .... MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY MATSON AND CARRIED UNNAIMOUSLY TO DENY REQUEST TO PURCHASE CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT LAKESHORE AND SILVER AND ESTABLISH A POLICY TO RETAIN ALL CITY-OWNED LAKE FRONT PROPERTIES UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ULTIMATE USE OF THESE PROPERTIES IS DETERMINED. 58. Waiver of Fees - Elsinore High School Homecoming Celebration. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER TO DENY REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, STRIGOTTE MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY VERMILLION TO WAIVE THE SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION FEE FOR ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL HOMECOMING CELEBRA- TION. .... AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, WINKLER Consensus: Council concurred to direct staff to bring back a report in sixty (60) days or sooner, recommending revisions to the Special Events Ordinance. During the interim, each request will be handled on a case by case basis. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS - None. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Dominauez: 1. Requested 'No Parking' signs be placed on east side of Spring Street from Graham Avenue to Prospect. He requested staff prepare an Ordinance for the next Council meeting. Council did not concur with this request. 2. Inquired about the burned out building on Sumner Street. The City Manager will follow-up and report in the weekly memorandum. -- 3. Requested a Joint Study Session between the City Council, Redevelop- ment Agency and Planning commission. Consensus: 6:30 p.m. Schedule meeting for Wednesday, October 29, 1986 at The City Clerk was directed to notify all parties. Page twenty-two City Council Minutes October 14, 1986 139 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS - Continued. Mavor striqotte: 1. Requested Frontier Drive and Casino Drive near I-15 Freeway, be re-named 'Lakeview Drive', for the sake of consistency. Staff will -- follow-up. 2. Requested staff send a letter to the Postmaster of Lake Elsinore requesting all areas within our Sphere of Influence be changed to 'Lake Elsilnore' postal area. Include most recent Sphere of Influence map. 3. Recommended a corner of the Council Chamber be utilized for the Christmas tree canned food drive. I"- Ln C\J W OJ <t 4. Commented on the Christmas display on Riverside Drive. The property owner has a right to create this display on his private property and the City has taken no position on the matter. Since Riverside Drive is a State Highway under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, the owner will have to comply with any regulations Caltrans may with to enforce. 5. Announced that a Town Hall meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, October 22, at 7:30 p.m. in the Machado Elementary School cafeteria. The meeting is open to the public and there will be a presentation regarding the ballot measures dealing with the Flood Control Bond Issue and Police and Fire services, with a question and answer period provided. Everyone was urged to attend. -- ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT 9:23 P.M. ~~~ . L 1/~U'C; N J. TRI OTT , MAYOR . CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: -