HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-23-1986 City Council Minutes
107
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 SOUTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1986
-
*****************************************************************************
r'-
Ln
C\I
W
CD
<t
-
-
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor
strigotte at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman winkler.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER,
STRIGOTTE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Gilbert, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director
Barrick, Community Development Director Miller, Public Services
Director Kirchner and City Clerk Oliver.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further
consideration and discussion:
Item No.5.
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
l. The following Minutes were approved:
a. September 10, 1986 - Regular City Council Meeting
b. September 10, 1986 - Board of Appeals Meeting
The following Minutes were received and filed:
c. September 2, 1986 - Planning Commission Meeting
d. September 2, 1986 - Design Review Board Meeting
2. Received and filed Treasurer's Report - August 31, 1986.
3. Adopted Resolution No. 86-56 approving Council Policy Number
200-6.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER
200-6, RELATIVE TO THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES.
4. Adopted Resolution No. 86-65 supporting the establishment of the
"Red Ribbon Campaign" to promote drug prevention.
l~ge two
City Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN TO PROMOTE DRUG PREVENTION.
6. Rejected and referred Claim No. 86-22 - Corona Clay Company.
7. Approved setting date of October 14, 1986 for public hearing of:
a. General Plan Amendment 86-8 and Zone Change 86-12 - Schmid
Development - Request to change the General Plan Designation
from Limited Industrial to Commercial Manufacturing on
approximately fifty (50) acres and to rezone property from
M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) to C-M (Commercial Manufacturing)
between Collier Avenue and I-15 from Nichols Road to approxi-
mately 1700 feet west of Riverside Drive.
b. Tentative Parcel Map 21587 - Schmid Development - Request to
subdivide 40.76 acres into sixty-one (61) lots located between
Collier Avenue and I-15 from Nichols Road to approximately
1700 feet west of Riverside Drive.
...,
c. General Plan Amendment 86-9 and Zone Change 86-14 Revised -
Preston Barrett - Request to amend the General Plan Land Use
Map from Mixed Use to High Density Residential and change
the Zoning District from C-1 (Limited Commercial) to R-3
(Multiple-Family Residential) on 1.93 acres located on the
west side of Lewis Street between Graham Avenue and Lakeshore
Drive and on the southeast corner of Lewis Street and
Graham Avenue.
...,
d. Zone Change 86-13 - Realty Center - Request to rezone approxi-
mately 3.5 acres at the corner of Lash Avenue and Riverside
Drive from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to C-1 (Neighbor-
hood Commercial) Zoning District.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Acceptance of Drainage Waters and Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights
for Lake Elsinore Mini-Storage, 29151 Riverside Drive - Commercial
Project 86-11 - Anderson.
Mr. Mo1endyk explained there was an error in the Acceptance of
Drainage Waters Document and requested that portion of the item be
removed from the agenda.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
ACCEPT QUITCLAIM DEED FOR WATER RIGHTS AT 29151 RIVERSIDE DRIVE -
COMMERCIAL PROJECT 86-11 - GORDON C. ANDERSON.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
...,
31. Refuse Collection Rate Increase - Resolution No. 86-63.
Mr. Gilbert reported that presently, a contract exists between the
City of Lake Elsinore and ROdriguez Disposal for Citywide refuse
collection. Closure of the Lake Elsinore Disposal Site scheduled
for October 30, 1986, will result in additional costs to the con-
tractor for refuse transport and dump fees. Staff recommends
adoption of Resolution No. 86-63 which increases rates for refuse
collection.
.....
~
~
N
W
m
~
.....
~
109'
Page three
city council Minutes
September 23, 1986
PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued.
31. Refuse Collection Rate Increase - Resolution No. 86-63.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. asking those
in favor of the refuse collection rate increase to speak. The
following person spoke:
1. Paul Block, from the San Bernardino and Riverside County Disposal
Association, representing the contractor, Jess Rodriguez, com-
mented that the increase is in compliance with Sub-Chapter 15
of the Health and Safety Code and is an indirect tax passed
from the public through the contractor to the County.
Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to the refuse collection
rate ,increase to speak. The following persons spoke:
1. E.A. Glasgow, 270 White Oak Road, Lake Elsinore, commented that
the rate increase creates a hardship on many citizens.
2. Joy Elizabeth Porthon, 308 Lyon, Lake Elsinore, commented that
she is a renter. She fears her rent will increase if her
landlord has an increase in refuse collection fees.
Mayor Strigotte closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 86-63 REVISING REFUSE COLLECTION RATES.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REFUSE COLLECTION RATES
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 85-43.
BOARD OF APPEALS
COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AT 7:19 P.M.
COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 7:21 P.M.
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
51. Ordinance No. 775 - Rezoning certain property from R-1 to C-2
Zoning District (Zone Change 86-4 - Bruce Ayres) - Second Reading.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 775,
ORDINANCE NO. 775
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-l (SINGLE-FAMILY RESI-
DENCE) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT
(ZONE CHANGE 86-4 - BRUCE AYRES) .
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION,
WINKLER, STRIGOTTE
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
11~ge four
c~ty Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued.
52. Request for Waiver of Fees for Special Event Application - Downtown
Business Association and Veteran's Day Parade Association.
Mr. Miller reported two requests have been received for waiver of
fees, for the Veteran's Day Parade on November 8th and for the
Mr. Downtown Event on November 1st. Application fees for Special
Events are intended to offset processing costs, therefore, waiving
of fees results in the General Fund subsidizing these costs. Staff
recommends both requests for waiver of fees be denied.
....
Mayor Strigotte opened the floor for comments from the following
members of the Veteran's Day Parade Association who requested
Council approve their request for waiver of fees:
1. Sheri Groth, 424 N. Spring Street, Lake Elsinore,
2. Archie Johnson, Association Chairman,
3. Rudy Kram, American Legion Post member,
4. Dick Batson, Association Vice-Chairman,
5. William Freeman, Veteran's Day Parade Director.
Lengthy Council discussion followed regarding the cost in staff time
involved in processing special events permit applications, the
existing Ordinance, user-pay policy, possible exceptions for certain
community events and need to review existing policy.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY VERMILLION TO APPROVE REQUEST TO
WAIVE SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION FEES FOR THE VETERAN'S DAY PARADE
ASSOCIATION AND DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION FOR VETERAN'S DAY
PARADE ON NOVEMBER 8, 1986 AND MR. DOWNTOWN EVENT ON NOVEMBER 1,
1986.
..-
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED TO APPROVE REQUEST
TO WAIVE SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION FEE FOR VETERAN'S DAY PARADE ON
NOVEMBER 8, 1986.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER, STRIGOTTE
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED TO DENY REQUEST TO
WAIVE SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION FEE FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
FOR MR. DOWNTOWN EVENT ON NOVEMBER 1, 1986.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STRIGOTTE
53. Conditional Exception Permit 86-9 - Atlantic Richfield - Appeal of
Denial by Planning Commission for a Seventy-Foot High Freeway Sign.
Mr. Molendyk reported that the applicant has requested this matter
be continued to the next Council meeting. Staff recommends con-
tinuance to October 14, 1986.
...
MOVED BY VERMILLION, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
TO CONTINUE APPEAL OF DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 86-9
TO OCTOBER 14, 1986.
.....
~
~
N
W
m
~
.....
.....
111
Page five
City Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued.
54. Tentative Tract Map 20296 - The Grayson Companies - Request for
Extension of Time.
Mr. Miller reported Tentative Tract Map 20296 was approved by
Council on September 25, 1984 and is due to expire on September 25,
1986. A one-year extension of time has been requested by the
project engineer. Staff recommends Council grant one-year exten-
sion, changing expiration date for the map to September 25, 1987.
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
TO APPROVE ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
20296, TO SEPTEMBER 25, 1987.
55. Residential Project 86-6 - Construction of tri-plex on two lots
on Riverside Drive, sixty feet west of Robertson - Jim Moore.
Mr. Miller gave an overview of Residential Project 86-6 and
recommended Council adopt the Negative Declaration 86-43 and
the findings and approve Residential Project 86-6, subject to
forty-three (43) conditions recommended by the Planning Commission
and Design Review Board.
Council discussed concerns regarding possible traffic and circu-
lation problems, quality of architectural and landscaping design.
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED TO ADOPT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND FINDINGS AND APPROVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
86-6, SUBJECT TO FORTY-THREE (43) CONDITIONS, AS FOLLOWS:
FINDINGS:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and
objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in
which the project is located.
2. The project, as conditioned, would comply with the design
directives contained in section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with condi-
tions, have been incorporated into the approval of the
subject project to insure development of the property in
accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
planning district in which the site is located.
CONDITIONS
1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void one year
following date of approval.
2. All project conditions of approval are to be met prior to
Building Division issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and
release of utilities.
3. These conditions of approval shall be attached or reproduced
upon page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by
the Division of Building and Safety.
4. All roof mounted equipment, trash areas, and ground support
equipment shall be effectively screened from public view,
subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.
5. All signage shall be by City Permit, as approved by the Com-
munity Development Director.
6. All exterior on-site lighting shall be low pressure sodium
and shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property or streets.
It3ge six
C~ty Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - Continued.
55. Residential Project 86-6 - Continued.
7. Existing Palm Trees may be used for street trees, if possible.
8. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans
and/or as modified by Planning Commission or Design Review
Board. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the
Design Review Board.
9. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler
system with 100% watering coverage.
10. All planting areas shall be separated from paved driveway areas
with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb.
11. P1antings within ten-feet (10') of singular ingress/egress
points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36").
-
12. Only Class "A" fire retardant roofing materials are to be
used.
13. The on-site trash enclosure shall be constructed per City
standards as approved by the Community Development Director,
with materials to match the facade of the residential building.
14. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire
protection.
The applicant/developer shall provide written
certification from the appropriate water company
that the required fire hydrants are either exist-
ing or that financial arrangements have been made
to provide them.
b) Install portable fire extinguishers as per NFPA,
Pamphlet #10.
a)
-
c) Final conditions will be addressed when building
plans are reviewed in Building and Safety.
15. All required off-site improvements shall be completed prior to
release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupan~y
for any units.
16. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
Meet all requirements
and the Lake Elsinore
school overcrowding.
Fees) .
18. All project slopes are not to exceed a maximum of 2:1 finished
slopes and are to be treated with appropriate erosion control
vegetational growth as proposed in the detailed Landscape Plan,
and approved by the Design Review Board.
17.
of the Elsinore Union High School District
Elementary School District to offset
Meet City Ordinance No. 588 (School Impact
19. A precise grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Chief Building Official. Interim erosion control measures
shall be taken thirty (30) days after rough grading, as ap-
proved by the Chief Building Official.
20. The project shall connect to sewer.
21. Meet the requirements of Riverside County Health Department.
22. Meet the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District.
-
Page seven
city council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - Continued.
113
55. Residential Project 86-6 - continued.
23. The mailboxes for the rental units on-site shall be archi-
tecturally treated to soften the appearance of the hard edge
"metal box" construction, with treatment to match the build-
ing materials used in the development of the units, as ap-
proved by the Community Development Director, which may
include mailboxes built into wall.
-
25.
I'-
U)
C\I
W
CD 26.
<t
27.
24. A conceptual landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted for
approval by the Director of Community Development which shall
include the location of all trees to be preserved, and an
adequate plan of landscaping and irrigation including imagina-
tive use of the courtyard.
The garage area shall be redesigned to allow a minimum clear
space of 10' x 20' for each of the three (3) spaces. All
garage spaces are to clearly identify parking spaces for each
unit. To accomplish this, the spaces are to be numbered to
correspond with rental units, as approved by the Community
Development Director.
A Lot Merger shall be completed before Certificate of Occupancy
is issued.
-
A Hydrology Study shall be completed and submitted to the
Director of Community Development, addressing the drainage
issues of the area and showing plans for adequate site drainage.
28. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Cal
Trans, for the ingress/egress point and for permission to
access sewer which is located across Riverside Drive.
29. Plans for street improvements shall be submitted to both the
City and Cal Trans for final approval.
30. Curbing along Riverside Drive shall be painted red and be posted
"No Parking", as per Cal Trans standards.
31. All windows shall be dual-glazed to mitigate noise levels
emitted from the adjacent State Highway. A three foot (3')
wall shall also be constructed along Riverside Drive to
screen road noise, as depicted in plans.
32. The stairway shall be redesigned as depicted in Exhibit "B"
to screen it's view from Riverside Drive or shall be screened
with stucco wall as depicted in rendering.
33. Plans which provide acceptable architectural and landscaping
enhancements along the front and side elevations shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits subject
to the approval of the Community Development Director.
34. A six-foot (6') high fence shall be constructed along the side
and rear property lines.
-
35. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of
the Municipal Code.
36. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 and 764 per Cal
Trans requirements (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code)
regarding public improvements for buildings and subdivisions.
37. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of
the Municipal Code) regarding grading.
38. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the
Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions.
It4ge eight
c~ty Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - Continued.
55. Residential Project 86-6 - Continued.
39. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees
for encroachment permits.
40. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding
capital improvement fees and engineering plan check fees
for other than subdivisions.
41. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding instal-
lation of improvements as a condition of building permits.
-
42. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore
or its designee per Ordinance No. 529.
43. Applicant shall provide a stop sign architecturally acceptable
by the Community Development Director.
BUSINESS ITEMS
56. Exchange of Property Between the City of Lake Elsinore and Robert
Williams.
Mr. Gilbert reported that in July Council agreed with the concept
of exchanging a City-owned property at Casino and Mill Street
for a parcel at 32172 Machado Street owned by Robert Williams.
In August, Council directed staff to initiate title and appraisal
work on the City-owned parcel. Mr. Gilbert gave a status report
on the project and recommended that Council authorize staff to
proceed with title, appraisal and other necessary work as follows:
1) Obtain written consent from Caltrans to vacate or sell
Parcel A.
'-'
2) Vacation of Parcel B (currently within Casino right-of-way).
3) Final preparation of a deed for Parcels A and B.
4) Review title and appraisal on Machado parcel.
5) Negotiate preliminary terms and conditions of property
transfer.
6) Selection of an escrow agent.
7) Preparation of escrow documents.
8) Final Council approval.
Lengthy Council discussion followed.
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
DIRECT STAFF TO OBTAIN CONSENT FROM CALTRANS TO VACATE PARCEL 'A'
AND OBTAIN VERBAL INFORMATION FROM TITLE COMPANY REGARDING PARCEL
'B' (CURRENTLY WITHIN CASINO DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY), PRIOR TO EXPEN-
DITURE OF FUNDS. FUNDING TO BE ALLOCATED THROUGH THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY.
-
57. Term of Contract - Refuse Collection.
Mr. Mo1endyk reported that Mr. Paul Block, representing Jess
ROdriguez submitted a letter today, requesting this item be
continued for thirty (30) days in order to give the Disposal
Association an opportunity to review the contract. He recom-
mended Council continue hearing of this item until October 28,
1986.
115
Page nine
City Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
BUSINESS ITEMS - continued.
57. Term of Contract - Refuse Collection - Continued.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
TO CONTINUE REVIEW OF REFUSE COLLECTION CONTRACT TO OCTOBER 28,
-- 1986.
~
~
N
W
m
~
--
--
58.
Mayor Strigotte requested this contract be reviewed by the Finance
Committee prior to being placed on another Council agenda.
Weed Abatement and Other Programs.
Mr. Gilbert gave an update on the Weed Abatement Program and re-
ferred to the budget amendment necessary. Other possible budget
amendments were reviewed, including one-time capital outlay
projects, capital projects and cost of Christmas display. Staff
recommended adoption of Resolution No. 86-64, with amendments
if Council chooses to include additional budget amendments.
MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
NUMBER 86-64.
Lengthy Council discussion followed in an effort to clarify.
MOTION WITHDRAWN.
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED TO ADOPT
RESOLUTION NUMBER 86-64. AS PRESENTED, INCLUDING ADDITION OF
ONE MAN-YEAR AND WEED ABATEMENT RELATED EXPENSES ONLY.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION, STRIGOTTE
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
Mr. Molendvk:
1) Reported that the viscious dog problem which was discussed at
length at the last Council meeting, has been resolved.
2) Called upon Ron Kirchner who gave a status report on the stree~
maintenance, slurry seal program.
3) Requested Council set a date for a Joint Study Session with
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Planning Commission.
No date was agreed upon.
4) A report on City-Owned property is in progress and will be
presented at the October 14th Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Winkler:
1) Complimented staff on their work with the T and S Development
Project.
Councilman Matson:
1) Commented that the Special Events Ordinance should be reviewed
and possibly amended. Staff to follow-up.
2) Commented on businesses selling gasoline and liquor on the same
premises. In cities which prohibit this practice, as ours does,
businesses have sued, claiming this regulation constitutes discrim-
ination. He requested staff review our new Title 17 Ordinance.
116
Page ten
City Council Minutes
September 23, 1986
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS - Continued.
Councilman Matson - Continued:
3) Reported on his meeting with the Downtown Business Association.
4) Reported on Public Works Committee activities. Mr. Kirchner is
following-up on several street improvement recommendations.
Councilman Dominquez:
-
1) Reported on a Transportation Seminar which he attended last week.
Councilman Vermillion:
1) suggested that Ca1trans abandon existing Highway 74 along Riverside
Drive and re-route along Railroad Canyon Road, across the lake bed
to the Ortega Highway and connect to Highway 74 again at that point.
2) Stated that he objects to the Lake Management model being displayed
in the Council Chambers and taking up space. He asked it be
located elsewhere.
Mayor Striqotte:
1) Directed Councilman Matson to meet with local civic organizations
on Tuesday, september 30 at 4:30 p.m., to review Special Event
Permits.
2) Announced a Groundbreaking Ceremony on October 21st at 11:00 a.m.
for the new County Jail facility. Councilmembers were urged to
attend.
3)
Inquired about the status of striping on Quail Drive. Mr. Kirchner
stated this project has been scheduled.
....
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO
ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT 9:20 P.M.
~ 1: jt::~
Y: ON~STRIGO~, MAYOR
CITY O~ LAKE ELSINORE
ATTEST:
J
.~~~A
Oliver, ity Clerk
-