The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-13-1986 City Council Minutes "476 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, MAY 13, 1986 **********************************************************************1 ~ CALL TO ORDER -- The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Strigotte at 7:02 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Dominguez. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, City Attorney Harper, Community Development Director Miller, Community Services Director Barrick, City Engineer Keith and City Clerk Money. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln Street, Lake Elsinore, commented that she is the Chairman of the Lake Elsinore Coalition for Lake Manage- ment. She spoke in support of the current lake management plan -' and urged everyone to become informed about this issue and asked interested persons to contact her for further information. PRESENTATIONS A. Mayor Strigotte prOClaimed May 11 through 17, 1986, as Police Week and May 15, 1986 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor of those noble officers who have sacrificed their lives in the line of duty. B. Mayor Strigotte prOClaimed the week of May 18 through 24, 1986, as Traffic Safety Week. C. Mayor Strigotte introduced Captain Oliver Thompson, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, who accepted the two proclamations and commented on the new uniforms which have been designed for local identification of Lake Elsinore police officers. Deputies assigned to the Lake Elsinore Station were introduced by Sergeant Grotefend. D. Mayor Strigotte presented a special award to the Lake Elsinore Volunteer Fire Fighters in recognition of their loyal service to the citizens of Lake Elsinore. E. May.pr Strigotte proclaimed May 1 through 31, 1986 as "Elks NationaD. Youth Month" and presented the proclamation to Sam Sredanovich, Exalted Ruler of the local Elks Lodge No. 2591. __ F. Mayor strigotte proclaimed the month of May, 1986 as "Older Elsinorians Month" and presented the proclamation to Dolores McDaniels, Senior Programs Coordinator, for display in the Lake Community Center. G. Kinq Videocablecompany prNenteda t4.ree-llinute vj.Qao proqram entitled tf'Listeh to the Old ones" createdanei produced by.Rita Wilsey and Robb Capielo. 4'4 '~ Page two City Couheil Minu~ May 13, 1986 PRESENTATIONS - continued. G. video Program - continued. 1) Mayor strigotte presented certificates of Appreciation to Rita wilsey and Robb capielo. - CONSENT CALENDAR Mr. Molendyk requested item number 12 be deleted from the Agenda. The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further consideration and discussion: Items Number 9, 11 and 13 ,.-. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1- The following Minutes were approved: a. April 9, 1986 - Regular City Council Meeting b. April 9, 1986 - Board of Appeals Meeting c. April 15, 1986 - Adjourned City Council Meeting d. April 22, 1986 - Regular City Council Meeting e. April 22, 1986 - Board of Appeals Meeting f. April 29, 1986 - Adjourned City Council Meeting .L; r-. l"'" ,"":) ~ o The following Minutes were received and filed: g. April 15, 1986 - Planning Commission Meeting h. April 15, 1986 - Design Review Board Meeting 2. Received and filed Treasurer's Monthly Report for April, 1986. 3. Ratified the Warrant List for the Month of April, 1986 in the total amount of Three-Hundred-Fifty-Five Thousand-Three-Hundred-Forty-Two Dollars and Four Cents ($355,342.04). 4. Received and filed Bank Reconciliation Report for April, 1986. 5. Approved submission of new Bank Signature Cards to remove Mayor Arta Valenzuela and Mayor Pro Tem Leon Strigotte, and add Mayor Strigotte and Mayor Pro Tem Winkler. 6. Received and filed Animal Control Activity Report for the month of February, 1986. 7. Received and filed Animal Control Activity Report for the month of ~ March, 1986. 8. Received and filed Building Division Activity Report for the month of April, 1986. 10. Adopted Resolution No. 86-24 regarding health and welfare benefits for elected officials. RESOLUTION NO. 86-24 A QsOW't'ION OF 'rHECITYC;.OU'NCIL Of ~E CX1'YOF XIAD ELS!N~, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF ELECTED OFFICIALS OP THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE IN THE CITY'S MEDICAL AND DENTAL Il~SURANCE PROGRAMS WHICH ARE PROVIDED FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THAT CITY. 478 Page three City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 CONSENT CALENDAR - Continued. 14. Authorized the City Clerk to advertise for annual bids for fur- nishing and placing concrete materials, with bid opening at 1:30 p.m. on June 13, 1986. 15. Awarded contract for Downtown Streets, Alleys and Storm Drains project to Bonadiman McCain, Inc. in the total amount of Three- Hundred-Seventy-Three-Thousand-Six-Hundred-seventy Dollars ($373,670). ~ ...." 16. Approved Agreement for Deferral of Public Improvements at 16631 Stoddard Street - RaYmond and Mildred Marquez. 17. Authorized the paYment of Thirty-Five Hundred Dollars ($3500) "In-Lieu" fees by Kathleen and John J. Finnell and Bertha and. Edward Amor, release of obligations to construct pUblic improve- ments along Lakeshore Drive, APN 379-214-021, and authorized recordation of a Notice of Release from Deferral Agreement (Recorded Instrument Number 242936). 18. Rejected and referred Claim Number 86-11, Christal M. Mills. 19. Rejected and referred Claim Number 86-12, Marge Reider. 20. Rejected and referred Claim Number 86-13 - Addie Hutchins. 21. Set date of May 27, 1986 for public hearing of: a. Declaring that certain weeds, rubbish, refuse, etc. constitute a nuisance and require abatement at various locations througr out the city. b. , .. ....i Cond~t~onal Use Perm~t 85-6 - Request to re-open Spaces 1 - 44 of the Rancho Laguna Recreational Vehicle Park on thirty-one (31) acres within the C-P and R Zoning Districts, located on the northeast side of Grand Avenue at Hill Street, near the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. c. Zone Change 86-9 - Proposal to rezone approximately 7.46 acres from R-l to C-P for a proposed eighteen (18) acre commercial development at the northwest corner of Sylvester Street and Mission Trail. 22. Set date of June 10, 1986 for pUblic hearing of: a. Amendments to Ordinance No. 673 which establishes Business Improvement Taxes in Zones 1 and 2, within the City of Lake Elsinore. b. Annexation of additional territory to an existing District and to provide for an annual levy and collection of assess- ments for certain maintenance in an existing Landscaping and Street Lighting District. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 9. Resolution in support of Proposition 43 - Parkland Act of 1986. __ Mr. Vermillion voiced his objections to this type of lobbying. This is a measure that he would prefer to vote on privately in the June election. Mr. Mo1endyk explained that this is a bond issue which wil~ l;)e vot.ed on in JJ1ne, 1986, and would provide funds for parks and recreation. HOVEPJ3Y1fINltLER, $lCOJl'tlEb BY MATSON AND CARRIED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 86-23 SUPPORTING PROPOSI'l'IOzr 43. 4'19 Page four city council Minutes K~y .13, 1986 - ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR - continued. 9. Resolution No. 86-23 - conti;nued. RESOLUTION NO. 86-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 WHICH PLACES BEFORE THE VOTERS OF California, JUNE 3, 1986, A BOND ISSUE TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREA- TION DEVELOPMENT, RESTORATION, LAND ACQUISITION AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NONE VERMILLION 11. Agreement for Fourth of July Program. Mr. Vermillion expressed his objection to taxpayer's money being used for this type of activity. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD HARRIS TO PROMOTE A PROGRAM OF ENTERTAIN- MENT FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION IN THE CITY. ~ t-- ~ r-:> ~ o AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NONE VERMILLION - 12. Agreement for Financial Services - Management Services Institute - (MSI) . continued to May 27, 1986. 13. Chamber of Commerce - Re~est of Waiver of Fees for 1986 Frontier Days Celebration. Mr. Molendyk clarified that the Chamber of Commerce is aware that they must petition the Downtown Business Association for waiver of the Business Improvement District Fee. Bill Starkey, President of the Chamber of Commerce, addresses the Council with an additional re~est for financial assistance from the City in the cost of re~ired law enforcement services for this function. MOVED BY STRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO WAIVE BUSINESS LICENSE FEES FOR 1986 FRONTIER DAYS CELEBRATION, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TWO-THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000) AND ASSIST IN THE COST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ONE- THOUSAND-FIVE-HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1500). ALSO, STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO ARRANGE A MEETING WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ALL LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS, INFORMING THEM THAT, IN THE FUTURE, THEIR VENDORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING BUSINESS LICENSE FEES AS WELL AS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FEES. ",,-. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Amendment to Ordinance No. 572 and Resolution No. 77-39. Adoption of Ordinance No. 764 deleting re~irements of paying sewer and capital improvement fees and deleting the Ceferral, agreement and establiShing an U in-li.u" f.. to rep+.ac;tesaic def.e:rral aqreement;s. Hr. Keith expltlined thats;.j.nce the City has sold their sewer and water dep~rtll\ents, Ordinanee No. 572 must be amencied. Also, staff recommends the present deferral of public improvement agreements be deleted and where circumstances prevent cOhstruction of improve- ments, "in-lieu" fees be established and collected. 480 Page five City Council Minutes May 13, 1926 PUBLI~ HEARINGS - Continued. 31. Amendments to Ordinance No. 572 and Resolution No. 77-39 - Continued The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. asking thor~ / in favor of the amendments to speak. No one asked to speak. ....JI.. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to the amendments to spear: The following persons spoke. 1. Sally Elliott, 33355 Greenwood Drive, Lake Elsinore, commented that she and her husband are building in the Country Club Height area. They feel improvements cannot be properly constructed at this time and asked for permission to sign a deferral agreement. She stated she would be willing to sponsor a petition for a tax assessment district in this area. 2. Tim Hostrauser, 3601 Amber Wood Court, Lake Elsinore, General Contractor, commented that he can install improvements at a much lower cost than the City. There is no:guaranty that the "in-lieu" fees will be suff~cient in the future to cover the costs. 3. Chuck Seward, property owner, would like to see a program which would allow for making periodic payments to cover improvements rather than a lump sum. Mayor Strigotte closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Lengthy Council and staff discussion followed. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO CONTINUE AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 572 TO JUNE 10, 1986, AND SEND BACK TO STAFF FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION BASED ON COUNCIL COMMENTS. ...I 32. Conditional Exception Permit 86-4 - Lakeview Apartments, Ltd. Mr. Miller reported this is a proposal to vary five feet (5') from required front yard setback for a twenty-four (24) unit apartment project on 1.03 acres located on Olive Street, 225 feet southwest of Prospect in an R-3, Multiple-Family Residen- tial Zone. Staff recommends Council adopt a Negative Declaration, adopt the four findings and approve Conditional Exception Permit 86-4. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:28 p.m. asking those in favor of CEP 86-4 to speak. No one asked to speak. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to CEP 86-4 to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:29 p.m. MOVED BY VERMILLION, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSL1 TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION! 86-4, SUBJECT TO FOUR FINDINGS, AS FOLLOWS: '~ 1. The topography of this site is characterized by slope grades ranging from five to twenty percent, and these conditions cannot be identified on any other surrounding properties or elsewhere within the R-3 Zoning District. Therefore, the granting of this variance is not providing special building privileges ~;:,prQptJZ'ty benefit,. 1;0 t.n:e d$v.10Ptar of this R-3 zohed property.' . '- o o (Y) w CD <C "..... I - Page six city council Minutes May 13, 1986 PUBLIC HEARI~GS - Continued. 32. Conditional Exception Permit 86-4 - continued. 481 FINDINGS: continued. 2. The granting of this variance does not undermine the intentions of the front yard setback for the project in providing adequate light, air and privacy for future projects residences. Nor does the granting of this variance create a disruptive public view of the streets cape relating to building placement closer to the front property lines than what is allowed in the R-3 Zoning District. 3. That such conditional exceptions are necessary for the preserva- tion and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 4. That the granting of such conditional exceptions will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neighborhood of the property for which such conditional exception is being sought. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, VERMILLION, WINKLER,STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON 33. Zone Change 86-6 - Jack Malki. Mr. Miller reported this is a proposal to change zoning designa- tion from R-l, Single-Family Residential and C-1, Limited Commer- cial, to C-2, General Commercial, on 1.8 acres, located approxi- mately five-hundred feet (500') southeast of the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Casino Drive. Staff recommends Council adopt a Negative Declaration, approve Zone Change 86-6 subject to three findings, and adopt Zone Change Ordinance No. 765. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. asking those in favor of Zone Change 86-6 to speak. The following persons spoke: 1. Jack Malki, 28191 Palmer, Mission Viejo, stated he is in favor of the Zone Change. Mayor Strigotte asked those in opposition to Zone Change 86-6 to speak. Hearing no one, the pUblic hearing was closed at 8:34 p.m. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 86-6 SUBJECT TO THREE FINDINGS, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The proposed Zone Change will bring the properties involved into conformance with the General Plan. 2. The City is mandated by State law to bring it's zoning into conformance with the General Plan. 3. The proposed zoning will be compatible with surrounding zoning and land uses. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 765: QRDINANC~ NO. 765 AN ~DIllANtE OF TH'E ,CITY OF '.'LAXE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RE~ONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-l (SINGLE-FAMILY RES!DENCE) AND C-l (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO C.2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT - ZONE CHANGE 86-6 - JACK MALKI. 482page seven City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued. 33. Zone Change 86-6 - Jack Malki - continued. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLEJ STRIGOTTE NONE ..p NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: .."", BOARD OF APPEALS Council adjourned to the Board of Appeals at 8:36 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:37 p.m. BUSINESS ITEMS . " 51. Resolution No. 86-25 - Revisions to business license and Business Improvement District taxes regarding Security Patrols. Ms. Barrick reported that due to the fact that Security Patrol Business License Tax appears to be excessive in relationship not only to regular business license taxes but also to business license tax collected in other cities. Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution Number 86-25 amending Resolution Number 82-80 and setting a public hearing date of June 10, 1986, to amend Ordinance Number 673 establishing the Business Improvement Taxes. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ~ TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 86-25 AND APPROVE THE DATE OF JUNE 10, 1986 FOR PUBLIC HEARING OF AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 673. 52. Lake Elsinore Landscaping and Street Lighting District - 1986/87 Assessment. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO MAY 27, 1986. 53. Resolution No. 86-29 - Amended Resolution for Commencement of Annexation Proceedings for Annexation No. 42. Mr. Miller reported that Council originally granted consent for commencement of annexation proceedings for an area of 10.25 acres (Jercha). The area was subsequently enlarged by 6.25 acres at the request of E.M. and Adele Bordelon. This enlarged Annexation No. 42 area was given implicit approval when Council adopted General Plan Amendment 86-1 and Zone Change 86-1 on April 9, 1986 Staff recommends approval of Resolution Number 86-29 which includes the entire 16.50 acrea area of Annexation No. 42. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 86-29. ....., RESOLUTION NO. 86-29 A RESO~UTIONQF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINOQ, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEI:DIJfGS TO ANNEX TO 1'HE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CERTAIN. UNINHA.BlTJO !['ERRITORYOESCRIBjfD -lIEREINAND D!:SIGli.A.1J:I:ED "ANNEXATION N€l. 4-2 - JERc..1lA/"~QELON ANNEXATION. ,--- o o (Y) W al <( - - 483 Page eight City council Minutes May 13, 1986 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 54. Residential project 86-1 - Lakeview Apartments, Ltd. Mr. Miller reported this is a proposal to construct a 24-unit apartment project on 1.03 acres in an R-3 (Multiple-Family Resi- dence) Zoning District on Olive Street, 225 feet southwest of the intersection with Prospect. Staff recommends approval of this project, subject to twenty-two Planning Commission and nineteen (19) Design Review Board conditions. MOVED BYSTRIGOTTE, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADD CONDITION NUMBER TWENTY-THREE (23) AS FOLLOWS: 23. ENTIRE PROJECT TO BE ON SEWER. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 86-1, SUBJECT TO TWENTY-TWO (22) PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS PLUS CONDITION NUMBER 23, AND NINETEEN (19) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CONDITIONS, AS FOLLOWS: PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The on-site trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the community Development Director, with materials to match the facade of the residential building. 2. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire protec- tion. a) The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. b) A fire flow of 2250 GPM for a 12 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. c) A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrdants on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2") will be required located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from anyone (1) adjacent hydrant in the system. d) Applicant/developer shall furnish one (1) copy of the water system plan to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrants types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow re- quirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside county Fire Department." e) In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements" building(s) must be area-separated into 6,000 to 8,000 square foot compart- ments as per Section 505(3) of the UBC (Uniform Building Code) . f) A~licant/develcp.r .hall ~e r.sp~nsible ~o provide or show th.re exists condition8 set forth by the Fire Department. .484 Page nine City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 54. Residential Project 86-1 - Continued. 3. All off-site improvements, including the improvement of Olive Street shall be completed prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for any units. 4. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 5. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. -~ 6. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 7. Applicant shall meet all project conditions prior to obtaining a certilficate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 8. All items depicted on site plan shall be provided as indicated on site plan unless otherwise modified by the Planning Commis- sion and/or Design Review Board. 9. Meet requirements of the Elsinore Union High School District and the Lake Elsinore Elementary School District to offset school overcrowding. To mitigate this situation, voluntary developer agreements are required. Meet City Ordinance No. 588. 10. Meet requirement of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the subsurface water disposal system pro- posed on site. 11. A secondary pedestrian access to the project shall be identi- fied which shall be designed to provide additional access to the units by the tenants and also shall satisfy emergency ~ service requirements. 12. All project slopes are to exhibit a maximum 2:1 finished slopes, except that a 1.5:1 slope between Olive Street right- of-way and the proposed units, as approved by the City Engineer, are to be treated with appropriate erosion control vegetational growth as approved by the Design Review Board. 13. A precise grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Department. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken thirty (30) days after rough grading, as ap- proved by the City Engineer. 14. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 15. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding improvements for buildings and sub-divisions. 16. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code) regarding grading. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. 18. M..t all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 reqarding fees fer encroachment permits. ....,j 17. 19. Meet all requirements of Reso~ution No. 77-39 regarding .oapital iJllprovement fe.~ and engineering pl~n check fees for other than subdivisions. -- o o cry w (Il <( ,.... - Page ten City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 485 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 54. Re$idential Project 86-1 - Continued. 20. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding in- stallation of improvements as a condition of building permit. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529. 22. For any drainage measures requiring percolation that area is to remain unobstructed, and that a deed restriction be recorded on the property prior to issuance of any building permits. 21. 23. Entire project to be on sewer. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void one year following date of approval. 2. All roof-mounted equipment, trash areas, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 3. The apartment complex shall not be referred to as the "Lake- view" Apartments, as the City already has two existing complexes with this entitlement. An alternative name shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director. All signage shall be by City Permit, as aproved by the Community Development Director. 4. 5. All exterior on-site lighting shall be low pressure sodium and shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto neighbor- ing property or streets. 6. street trees shall be planted inside the public right-of-way, and be separated a maximum of thirty feet (30') and be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon in size. 7. All conditions of approval are to be met prior to Building Division issuance of a certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities for any units. 8. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans and/or as modified by Planning Commission or Design Review Board. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the Design Review Board. 9. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with one-hundred percent (100%) watering coverage. 10. A final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 11. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb. 12. Plantings within ten-feet (10') of singular ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). 13. Carport designs and construction shall be subject to the approval of the Building Division and community Development Director. 14. Only Class ~A" fire retardant roofinq material. are to be used. . 4Sfi,age eleven City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 54. Residential Project 86-1 - continued. 15. Low level decorative lighting apparatuses shall be located at appropriate intervals along internal pedestrian pathways within apartment complex. To be designed to provide sufficient illum- ination and circle radius to aid evening strollers, to be approved by the community Development Director. 16. All carport designs are to be equipped with low pressure sodium lighting to provide security and guidance for both -' tenants and visitors alike, as approved by the Community Dev- elopment Director. r 17. A colored stamped concrete band shall be constructed at the twenty-five foot (25') driveway approach entry po~nt to be .' dimensioned not less than twenty-five feet (25') lengthwise and six-feet (6') wide. 18. All carport parking spaces are to clearly identify individual parking spaces for tenants within the complex. To accomplish this, the spaces are to be numbered so as to correspond with the rental units, as approved by the Community Development Director. 19. The mailboxes for the rental units on-site shall be archi- tecturally treated to soften the appearance of the hard edge "metal box" construction with treatment to match the building materials used in the development of the units, as approved by the Community Development Director. 55. Commercial Project 86-2 - Jack Malki. Mr. Miller reported this is a proposal to construct a small commercial shopping center, consisting of three (3) buildings .., totaling 16,970 square feet on 1.8 acres, located five-hundred feet (500') southeast of the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Casino Drive. Staff recommends approval of Commercial Project 86-2, subject to twenty (20) Planning Commission and twenty-two (22) Design Review Board conditions. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 86-2 SUBJECT TO TWENTY-TWO (22) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND TWENTY (20) PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS, AS FOLLOWS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void one year following date of approval. 2. A final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board, plan to include screen planting in front of parking areas with turf to accent the street frontages. 3. Applicant shall revise south elevation of the Firestone build ing to eliminate plain block and provide additional enhanceme , subject to the approval of the Community Development Director .."J 4. Applicant shall construct a horizontal tile band on the top section of the stucco pilasters, as exhibited in all building elevations. (To include both the retail and Firestone struc- tures), as approved by the Community Development Director. ~. All shrubs identif~~~ in the concept~al lanQscap~n9 plan shall be a5 gallon mini~ size,as approved by the o..iqn Review Board. 6. All signage .hall be by City Permit, as approveci by the Co...,. munity Development Director. --- o o M W (D <t - Page twelve city Council Mi~ut.s May 13, 1986 487 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 55. Commercial Project 86-2 - continued. 7. All conditions are to be met prior to Building Division issu- ance of a certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 8. Foundation plantings shall be planted along the north-east building elevation, as approved by the Design Review Board. 9. All parking facilities exposed to public views along Casino Drive and Mission Trail shall be screened with appropriate four foot high minimum vegetational material, as approved by the Design Review Board. 10. All roof mounted equipment, trash areas, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to the approval of the community Development Director. 11. All exterior on-site lighting shall be low pressure sodium and shielded and directed so as not to create glare onto neighbor- ing property or streets. 12. Street trees shall be planted inside the public right-of-way, and be separated a maximum of thirty-feet (30') and be a minimum of 15 gallon in size, as approved by the Design Review Board. 13. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans and/or as modified by Planning Commission or Design Review Board. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the Design Review Board. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprink- ler system with 100% watering coverage. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb. Plantings with ten-feet (10') of singular ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department, to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. BriCk, pavers, or similar treatments shall be laid in band designs, which are to be located at all three (3) driveway approaches leading to the project and are to be dimensioned not less than 6-feet in width and 25-feet in length, as ap- proved by the Community Development Director. 19. The designated site for Phase II shall be maintained with interim landscaping and graded to allow drainage to street or collector. 20. The restaurant building on-site shall be subject to review and approval by the City Design Review Board. 2~. The trash enclosure shall be constructed with white stucco as the predominant building material, as approved by the community Development Director, in accordance with specifi- cations on file with the Planning Division. 22. only Class "A: fire retardant roofing material shall be used. . 4 8 ~age thirteen City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. 55. Commercial Project 86-2 - continued. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant is to meet all County Fire Department requirements f for fire protection: a) b) The Fire Department is requried to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure estab- lished in Ordinance 546. ---: c) A fire flow of 2250 GPM for as 2 hour puration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be avail- able before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"X4"x2-l/2"x2-l/2") will be required located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the build- ing as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any one adjacent hydrant in the system. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for re- view. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/ approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." ..-J d) e) Install portable fire extinguishers as per NFPA, Pamphlet #10. f) Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system in the restaurant. g) Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. 2. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 3. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 4. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 5. Applicant shall meet all project conditions prior to Obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 6. All items depicted on site plan shall be provided as indicatec on the site plan unless otherwise modified by the Planning -J Commission and/or Design Review Board. 7. Developer shall connect project to the sewer system. All on- site water and sewer improvements shall be coordinated along the time schedule established by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 8. Applicant shall oonstruct an additional trash enclosure within the landscaped median area of the parking facility as identi- fied in Exhibit "B", as apprQv.d by the Co_unity Development Director. 489 Page fourteen City Council Minutes May 13, 1986 BUSINESS ITEMS - continued. "- 55. Commercial Project 86-2 - continued. 9. All off-site improvements, including the improvement of Casino Drive and Mission Trail shall be completed prior to release of utilities and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units. 10. The applicant shall submit a project phasing site plan deline- ating Phase I and Phase II prior to the Building Department is- suing any building permit for the construction of any structure on-site, to be approved by the Community Development Director. t..O X) f:'-o ''"':) Cl .~ 11. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 12. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for buildings and subdivisions. - 13. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 636 (Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code) regarding grading. 14. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. 15. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees for encroachment permits. 16. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check fees for other than subdivisions. 17. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding instal- lation of improvements as a condition of building permits. 18. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-19 regarding fees for traffic signal at Railroad Canyon Road and Missions Trail. Pay traffic mitigation fee in the amount of $8,460.67. 19. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529 20. Applicant to process a Lot Merger. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 1. Mr. Molendyk requested Council schedule a Joint Study Session with Planning Commission to discuss Title 17. Council concurred to schedule the meeting for Thursday, May 29, 1986 at 6:30 p.m. - 2. Mr. Molendyk reported there have been several requests from the community aSking Council to reaffirm their position on Lake Management. 3. The City Manager asked the City Engineer to give Council an update on studies regarding Lakeshore and Graham. Mr. Keith indicated that after preliminary inspection of the intersection, he would recommend the City hire a qualified Traffic Engineering firm to prepare a traffic engineering survey of the area. In order to protect the city from any unnecessary liability, certain steps must be taken to assure that all corrective measures are accom- plished in accordance with state law. 490 Page fifteen City council Minutes May 13, 1986 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Vermillion: 1. suggested the Sun Tribune conduct a survey to determine how many people feel Lakeshore Drive should be restored to two-way traffic. 2. Commented that he did not feel the City should be lobbying for lake management, that this should be left up to the voters to decide. -.. Councilman Dominquez: 1. Commented on a pie-shaped property at Kellogg, Lakeshore and Limited. This is a dead-end street and on weekends, traffic is such a problem that residents sometimes cannot use their driveways. He requested the City Engineer investigate and recommend solutions to this . problem. 2. Requested the Assistant City Manager work with Caltrans to accomp- lish placement of freeway signs indicating 'Food, Gas, Lodging' at Lake Elsinore exits along I-IS. Councilman Matson: 1. Responded in opposition to Mr. Vermillion's comment on lake manage- ment. He feels the Council should take a stand and make a commit- ment to support the approved lake management project which includes the construction of a levee. He commented on an article in the April 30th issue of the Bargain Bulletin which contained a great deal of mis-information and inferred that the Council might plan to approve some twelve-thousand (12,000) homes being built below the 1265 MSL, in the area behind the levee. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED TO RECONFIRM THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DOES NOT ENDORSE ANY HOMES BEING BUILT BELOW 1265 MSL, IN THE AREA BEHIND THE PROPOSED LEVEE. ....",. AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, STRIGOTTE NONE WINKLER MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED TO APPROPRIATE TEN-THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000) FOR ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS TO REFUTE MISINFORMATION REGARDING THE LAKE MANAGEMENT PROJECT, AND TO ASSURE THAT CORRECT INFORMATION GOES OUT TO THE COMMUNITY, CORREC- TING THESE AND FUTURE ERRORS THAT MAY BE PRINTED REGARDING THE LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN. ALSO, REQUESTED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD APPRO- PRIATE AN EQUAL AMOUNT TO EXTOLL THE BENEFITS OF LAKE MANAGEMENT WITH REGARD TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND WAYS IN WHICH IT WILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION Councilman Winkler: 1. Commented in favor of the lake management plan and urged the commu- .J nity to get behind the existing plan. Mavor striaotte: 1. Commented in favor of laxe management and stated it is the most important project for the well being of the City at this time. He suggested that the city'S efforts be coordinated with ~lsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 49l Page sixteen Ci~y Council Minutes May 13, 1986 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS - continued. Mavor striaotte - continued. 2. Referred to the list of Committee Appointments and requested a ~ motion to approve the appointments as presented. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED TO APPROVE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS, AS FOLLOWS: 1) Mayors and Councilmans Association - Fred Dominguez Jim Winkler 2) California Contract cities Assoc. Leon strigotte Jim Winkler Chamber of Commerce Fred Dominguez Leon Strigotte Leon Strigotte l.Q ;X) l"- '~ o ~ 3) Emergency Services (LESCOM) 4) 5) Downtown Business Association (DBA) - Fred Dominguez 6) Public Works Committee Fred Dominguez John Matson 7) Public Safety Committee Leon Strigotte Jim Winkl;e-r 8) Finance Committee John " Joiatson Leon 'Strigotte --- 9) Airport Committee Fred Dominguez Jim Winkler 10) Policy Committee John Matson Leon Strigotte Fred Dominguez Leon Strigotte 11) Centennial Committee 12) Lake Management Committee John Matson Leon Strigotte Leon Strigotte Jim Winkler 13) Sphere of Influence (LAFCO) AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NONE VERMILLION 3. Requested approval of appointments of representatives to the Southern California Joint Powers Insurance Authority. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ~ TO APPOINT MAYOR LEON STRIGOTTE AND MAYOR PRO TEM JIM WINKLER AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY. 4. Announced that, effective in May, 1986, Social Security will be at the Senior Center in Lake Elsinore on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. 5. Requested a joint study session be scheduled between the Council and Public Safety Commissioners. Consensus: Set the Joint study Session for wednesday, June 4, at ?:OO p.m. 492 Page seventeen City Council Minutes May 13, 198.6 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS - Continued. Mayor striqotte - continued. 6. Suggested a Study Session be set to review Council policy and set goals. He requested Councilmembers coordinate with the City Manager during the next week. 7. Reported that twelve (12) applications have been submitted for the Planning Commission. These applications will be reviewed ~ over the next two weeks and appointments announced at the next City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT 9:39 P.M. ~2~ /; EON J ~STRIG E, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: /7.._ _ - 7 ~ ., ....... ...1