Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-11-1987 City Council Minutes 396 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ....., **************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor-Strigotte at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Winkler. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, City Attorney Harper, Community Development Director Miller, Administrative Services Director Barrick, Public Services Director Kirchner, Executive Assistant Rogers~ and City Clerk Kasad. I I I ~ CEREMONIALS/PRESENTATIONS Mayor Strigotte introduced the Belgium Men's Volleyball Team that came to Southern California to participate in the World Cup Games in San Diego. This team is made up of police and firemen from Gand, Belgium. Mr. Frank Smith, local sponsor, advised that this team had won a Gold medal and four Bronze in the Games. A representative of the team thanked the Council and the City for it~ hospitality while the team was in town. Mayor Strigotte presented them with a City Tile Plaque and a Key to the City, the team presented the Mayor with a decorative Tin Plate and a Book about the City of Gand, Belgium. They also presented each Councilmember with a tie with the City seal of Gand. A. Mayor Strigotte read a Proclamation honoring Sergeant Donald Larsen for his contributions to the Lake Elsinore Station of the Riverside County Sheriff's Office and the residents of the City of Lake Elsinore and presented him with a City Tile Plaque. ~ PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Joe Punos, 31765 Via Valdez, expressed concern with the recent sewer rate increase, and particularly its impact on senior citizens with fixed incomes. 39'7 Page 2 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 2. Doroteo "Don" Solis, 31783 Via Cordova, commented on the recent increase in refuse collection charges, also with particular concern toward senior citizens. 3. Antoinette M. Bishop, 703 E. Mayberry, Hemet, expressed concern with the Lake Elsinore Animal Shelter, and what she -- considers to be unclean, inhumane and inadequate facilities. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further consideration and discussion: Items 5 and 6. I"- LO C\I W CD <I: MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ ,SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY-UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. July 9, 1987 - Adjourned City Council Meeting/Joint Meeting with Redevelopment Agency. (Continued from Meeting of July 28, 1987. b. July 28, 1987 - Regular City Council Meeting. The following Minutes were received and filed: -- c. July 21, 1987 - Planning Commission Meeting. 2. Received and filed the Animal Control Activity Report for July, 1987. 3. Received and filed Building Activity Report for July, 1987. 4. Ratified Warrant List for July, 1987 in the amount of $525,325.20. 7. Accepted Off-site Improvements and Release of Subdivision Bonds for Tract No. 20041 - Art Nelson, Inc. 8. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights on Tract 18719-5 for citation Homes. 9. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights on a Single Family Residence located at 108 Townsend Street for Tommy Gennusa. 10. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights on Commercial Project 86-10 for the Park Abrams Venture at 30850 & 30870 Riverside Drive. -- 11. Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights on Commercial Project 86-16 for Railroad Canyon Investors/ Art Nelson. 12. Set date of August 25, 1987 for public hearing of: a. Tentative Tract Map 22538 - Robert ~ Williams A request to subdivide 1.86 acres into five (5) parcels of 10,454 to 24,393 square feet. The project site is within the R-1 Zoning District ~':: 398 Page 3 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 located on the easterly side of Machado street between Christina Court and Marie Drive. b. Amendment 87-5 - City of Lake Elsinore To amend Section 17.98.080 regarding overnight camping and Section 17.98.090 regarding the sale or dispensing of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with Temporary Outdoor Activities. c. Conditional Use Permit 87-9 - Arthur ~ Nelson ..., An appeal of Planning Commission action regarding a request for churches to be added as a use permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the C-l (Neighborhood Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) district and a commercial shopping center. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 5. Set effective date of October 1, 1988 for Change of Street Name - Casino Drive to Vista Del Lago, to allow for a transition period. Councilman Dominguez referred to a letter received from Mr. Nick W. Notos, General Manager, Sahara Dunes Casino, and offered Mr. Notos the opportunity to address Council. Mr. Notos advised that his opinions were all in the letter and he had nothing further to add. His letter submitted formal opposition to the street name change of Malaga to Casino Drive at a later date. Mr. Dominguez concurred with __ Mr. Notos opinion. Councilman Winkler expressed agreement with staff recomm- endation to set effective date of October 1, 1988. Councilman Vermillion moved to abandon the prior approval of the Casino Drive to Vista Del Lago name change due to property owners discontent with it. Motion died for lack of a second. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH VERMILLION CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO APPROVE RECOMMENDATION OF OCTOBER 1, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE FOR NAME CHANGE FROM CASINO DRIVE TO VISTA DEL LAGO. 6. Application to Council for the Waiver of the Prohibition for Solicitation in the Public Right of Way, Section 5.08.160 for Martin's New York Style. Councilman Winkler referred to prior applications of this type and his feeling that this type of business had been turned down before. He questioned if the Council policy was in fact to deny this type of applications. City Manager Molendyk clarified that this had been discussed __ in the past and were not approved. He explained that the Municipal Code prohibits this type of activity, however gives Council the discretion to waive that prohibition. He suggested that if Council would prefer not to hear this type of request, the ordinance would need to be changed. Mr. Molendyk also expressed staff concerns with regard to push - I'- L.D C\I W m c::x: - - 399 Page 4 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 carts vs. stationary stands, and the possible need to condition approvals with a requirement to keep them moving along. Council discussion related to this type of activity being permitted in other cities such as Irvine and Riverside. Concerns related to the need to regulate locations and movement of the carts so they would not conflict with established businesses in the area. City Attorney Harper clarified that if the Council direction is going to be to deny the application, it would be appropriate to continue this item to the next meeting so the staff report can be rewritten with findings for denial. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING TO ALLOW FOR NEW FINDINGS AND TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON OTHER CITIES' ORDINANCES. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Tentative Tract Map 17413. Revision i! = Canyon Lake Hills A request to revise a previously approved Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 1,003 gross acres into 857 Single-Family Residential lots with 172 acres of associated recreation and open space uses as part of the approved Canyon Lake Hills Specific Plan, located one half mile north of Railroad Canyon Road and west of Canyon Lake. continued from July 28, 1987. Mayor strigotte requested Council consensus with regard to the setting of a special meeting. council concurred. Councilman Matson requested that the special meeting particularly address the following concerns: 1) Gated Community concept. How would it work? What areas would be gated? What access would be provided for emergency vehicle access? How would other access be regulated, Le: who can enter, who can not enter? 2) Private roads. What are the future implications of private roads? Would they be built to city standards? Could the residents petition at a later date to make these public roads? Has the access for adjacent property owners been resolved? 3) Results of Economic Impact Study. Councilman Winkler expressed specific concern with the guarded gate concept. He felt it would take a great deal of convincing for him to approve of this, as he is bothered by the government within a government situation. He also questioned other possible funding programs without CC & Rls or property owners associations. He reiterated concerns of Councilman Matson with regard to adjacent property access problems. Councilman Dominguez questioned provision of access to adjacent landowners, in addition to concerns of other 400 Page 5 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 Counci1members. Councilman Vermillion felt the economic impact report is the most important issue to address, as it will help prevent a burden on the taxpayers. Mayor Strigotte agreed with the issues 1 thru 7 proposed by staff being: 1) Fiscal impact of the project - 2) Objection to establishment of a homeowner's association to manage and maintain project amenities. 3) Provision of access to adjacent land owners. 4) Provision of an improved "turn-key" park. 5) Objection to a "gated community" type of management for private streets. 6) Use of bonding technique for pUblic improvements. 7) Adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report. He felt there was one area of this list that had not been established, being Council objection to a homeowners association. His main contention in this area is the establishment of a government within a government situation, although he could foresee the establishment of an assessment district for the funding of roads and other improvements. He also expressed concern that the E.I.R. is not adequate and probably was not adequate even when it was written in 1979. - Council in discussion with Mr. Nohl Toiman, co-owner of the project, chose a date of September 17, 1987, for the special meeting. Mr. Toiman advised that they have recently contracted for the Fiscal Impact Report to update the previous report and additional pertinent information. He explained reasoning behind the establishment of a homeowners association which is mostly for maintenance of storm drains, catch basins, park facilities, man-made lakes and landscaped areas. He also explained the need for parks and private facilities such as the proposed swim club and tennis club to make the project more marketable. He clarified that they have met with 10 of the 13 adjacent land owners and reached tentative agreements to work together to resolve access concerns. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE HEARING TO A SPECIAL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 AT 7:00 P.M. 32. Zone Change 87-5 - Art Nelson. Brookstone Development Inc. A request to change the zoning from R-R-O (A former County zoning designation) to C-2 General Commercial) on 2.19 acres on the southerly corner of Central and Dexter Street. -- - l"- I!) C\J W CD c::x: - 401 Page 6 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 Community Development Director Miller explained that this zone change would bring the area into compliance with the General Plan. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. asking those in favor of the Zone Change to speak. steve Brown, 35721 Capistrano Beach Road, representing the developer requested that Council support the proposed change. Mayor Strigotte requested those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:03 p.m. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs 1. No significant adverse environmental impacts are anticipated to be created by this proposed Zone Change. 2. The request to change the site's current R-R-O (formerly County designation) to C-2 (General Commercial) is consistent with goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. 3. This project will bring the zoning designation, of the site, into compliance with the General Plan, as required by State law. ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 87-19; APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 87-5 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 817. ORDINANCE NO. 817 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 2.19 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND DEXTER STREET FROM R-R-O (RURAL RESIDENTIAL - OUTDOOR ADVERTISING TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 87-5 ART NELSON, BROOKS TONE DEVELOPMENT, INC.) UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 8:04 P.M. 33. Redevelopment proiect Area III = Continued Joint Public Hearinq with the Redevelopment Aqencv. Receipt of Report of the Fiscal Review Committee. Adoption of Ordinance No. 815 adopting the Redevelopment 402 Page 7 - City Council Minutes - August II, 1987 Plan for Project Area III. David Shie, representing Municipal Services Inc. explained the Fiscal Review Report and its recommendations. He reviewed the impacts of tax increment financing and the limitations. City Attorney Harper clarified that this portion of the public hearing was specifically for comments on the Fiscal Review Report. __ The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. asking those in favor of the report to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Strigotte requested those in opposition to the report to speak. Jack Matlock, 24070 pine Ave., San Jacinto, representing all of the local school districts, expressed concern that the needs of the schools based on increase population have not been addressed by the report. He suggested a pass thru agreement between the City/Agency and the School Districts so they can be compensated for the increases. Mayor Strigotte clarified the City's attempts to fund schools and the problems which were encountered with the State a few years ago. He expressed concern that the State is not willing to work with the City Council to assist the schools. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 __ TO 1 WITH VERMILLION CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE AND WINKLER ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 87-51, RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AMENDING THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ACCOMPANYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RANCHO LAGUNA PROJECT AREA III. AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 815. ORDINANCE NO. 815 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE -- ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER ~ ~ ~ N W m ~ ~ ..... 403 Page 8 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 BUSINESS ITEMS 51. Commercial proiect 87-5 - Arthur ~ Nelson - Brookstone Development, Inc. A request to construct a 11,935 square foot Commercial center on 1.06 acres on the southerly corner of Central and Dexter Street in a C-2 District. Community Development Director Miller reviewed the project and its modifications. He advised that Condition Nos. 4, 5, 18, 23, 25 and 26 had been modified to require return to Planning commission for review, in addition to the final landscape plan. . Steve Brown, representing the developer, clarified the rendering provided, specifically with regard to the illustrated Mobil Service station on the site. He explained that they are currently in negotiations with Mobil for this site. He also explained the access provisions from Dexter Street and Central Avenue. He showed renderings with and without the Mobil station in the event that the negotiations fall through. Councilman Matson expressed concern with the 18 acres adjacent to the development and the need to master plan this area, as well as the development of another strip commercial project. He questioned the reasoning behind this presenta- tion of this project to Council prior to final review by the Planning Commission. He further commented that he would hope this project could be upscaled from the development by Mr. Nelson at Lakeshore Drive and Clement. He also questioned possibility for improvement of the back elevation and the traffic circulation for the area. Councilman Dominguez questioned signalization, monumentation, medians street lighting and landscaping on Central Avenue. He suggested that these be included at the time of develop- ment rather than putting it off. Mayor Strigotte questioned what was being proposed and what types of variances and use permits would be required to fill this development. He expressed particular concern with prior developments which have been filled with churches, schools and government offices. Art Nelson, 38681 Riverside Drive, clarified that this is a commercial project and explained the need in his other development for temporary use permit for a church. Mayor strigotte explained that there are areas available for schools and churches without using the limited areas appropriate for commercial development. He questioned the possible need to change the zoning code to regulate this type of development. Art Nelson highlighted the upgrades he has included in this development plan. Mayor strigotte questioned compatibility of this development with larger developments in the area. Neil Cleveland, one of the owners of adjacent 18 acres, advised the they are currently working on a master plan of the area to include traffic circulation, and utility 404 Page 9 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 placement. He expressed their support of the proposed development. Councilman Matson was concerned with this item returning to the Planning Commission for review without further Council consideration. He requested confirmation that they were not approving the proposed gas station and that it would be . coming to Council for approval. Community Development Director Miller verified that this was __ not the approval for the gas station. He further explained the landscaping requirements in the event the gas station did not get developed, as well as in the interim if construction were to be put off. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findings 1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. This project, as approved, with the attached condi- tions will comply with the Goals and objectives of the General Plan and General Commercial Zone. 3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section __ 17.82.070 have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 87-19, AND APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 87-5 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS; IF THERE ARE NO CHANGES MADE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION LEVEL; AND IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION INCLUDES REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDIANS, SIGNALIZATION, MONUMENTATION, STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING. Conditions 1. Approval of Commercial Project 87-5 is subject to the approval of Zone Change 87-5. 2. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised parking and circulation plan addressing redesign suggested in Exhibit 4 and relocation of the trash enclosure to the southwest corner of the site or other location with improved access, subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 4. The circular drive at the southeast corner of the commercial building shall be eliminated or rede- signed to improve access and loading facilities and -- -;..~\o:,i+.i:i"~j;~' I'-'\. ~ ~ ~ N W m ~ ..... ~ 405 Page 10 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 provide architectural screening of the loading and equipment area, subject to review and approval of the Planning commission. 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping and irrigation plan for review and approval by the Planning Commission, to include additional landscaping treatment to diminish the impacts of large blank walls on the rear elevation (north and east), to provide screening of parking area from Central Avenue and provide additional landscaping between the driveway and the building along Central Avenue. 6. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent colors, materials and specifications which will enhance the center's design and meet the provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning commission. All signage to be by City permit and in conformance with the approved Master Signage Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of each sign. 7. Brick pavers or texture pavement treatments shall be laid in bank designs, shall be located at the driveway approaches. 8. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. 9. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened in a manner compatible with the architectural design of the building. Demonstration of compliance with this condition shall be included in building plans. 10. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 11. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 12. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. A detail shall be included in the building plans, subject to the approval of the Postal Service and the Director of Community Development. 13. Any security lighting located on-site shall be ornamental and shall be shown on building plans, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 14. All required off-site improvements and street dedication shall be provided in accordance with adopted City standards and subject to approval by 406 Page 11 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 the City Engineer. All improvements shall be installed prior to the release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 15. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way along Central Avenue to provide for 55 foot half width, consistent with the City's designation of Central as an arterial street. 16. The applicant record a parcel map for the merging of __ the nine (9) parcels and the creation of two (2) lots, subject to approval by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. 17. Construction generated dust and erosion control measure shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 18. All undeveloped and or construction areas on the entire 2.19 acre site shall be maintained in a safe and neat manner at all times. Temporary turf or ground cover and temporary irrigation for these areas shall be made a part of the final Landscaping Plan and subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. 19. Reduce pressure principle backflow devices shall be required after all service meters. 20. On-site surface water run-off shall not cross the sidewalks. 21. The applicant shall submit sewer and water plans to __ the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards with ~he system designs. 22. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protections and shall include any additional requirements requested by the Fire Marshal. A fire detector check assembly shall be required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. 23. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. A modified site plan showing the access off of Allen and Central with the landscaping plan shall be brought back before the Commission for review and approval. 24. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 25. As Allen street is recommended for future abandonment or vacation the improvements along Allen indicated on the plans shall be incorporated into the proposed development, eliminated or modified, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director, to be brought back before the Planning Commission for review and --- - r'- LD C\J W CD <( - - 401f Page 12 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 approval. 26. Additional architectural treatments or plant-ons or treatments similar to those illustrated in Exhibit 5, or their equivalent shall be incorporated in the building plans, also include possible break in . elevation of the roof, to be brought back before the Planning Commission for review and approval. Enqineerinq Department Conditions 27. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 28. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No.572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for building and sUbdivisions, including provisions for future installation of a median on Central Avenue. 29. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code regarding grading. 30. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the Municipal Code regarding flood hazard regulations. 31. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.68 of the Municipal Code regarding floodplain management. 32. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees for encroachment permits. 33. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check for other than subdivisions. 34. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees, installation of improvements as a condition of building permit. 35. Recommendations contained with the report on the traffic engineer including limitations on right turn ingress and egress on Central Avenue shall be implemented. 36. Grease traps to be provided on all surface drainage exits. 52. Industrial proiect 87-2 - Arthur ~ Nelson - Brookstone Development. Inc. A request to construct two buildings totaling 18,786 square feet on 1.46 acres located on the east side of Birch street approximately 550 feet south of Minthorn street in an M-l (Limited/ Manufacturing) District. Community Development Director Miller advised that this project is in the Warm Springs Industrial Park, and the proposed new location of King Video. He pointed out the roof mounted satellite type dish and explained that it is significantly smaller than a standard satellite dish because it is a microwave dish. ;',::')>,' 408 Page 13 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY VERMILLION AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs 1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals __ and Objectives of the General Plan and the Limited Manufacturing Zoning District. 3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 87-20, AND APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 87-2 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Conditions 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. -- 3. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations and/or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 4. All required off-site improvements, including street lighting, shall be completed in accordance with improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 6. Meet all County Fire Department requirements for fire protection or alternative requirements as modified in writing by the Fire Marshal. 7. All undeveloped and or construction areas associated with the site shall be maintained in a safe and neat __ manner at all times. 8. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be contained in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and using best construction practices. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken 30 Page 14 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 409 ---- days after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building Official. 9. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City street Tree List, a maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 15 gallon in size, as approved by the Community Development Director. 10. Applicant shall submit a Precise Landscape and Irrigation Plan, which shall include 100% watering coverage subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, to include additional foundation planting in front of the buildings and walls. 11. ~ ~ N 12. W m 13. ~ 14. ~ All roof mounted equipment including the one microwave dish shall be screened with screening which is architecturally integrated with the building plans. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. Trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standards, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of fixture. 15. A final grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the Chief Building Official. 16. The project shall connect to sewer. 17. Any overnight storage of fleet vehicles shall be maintained in the rear of the site. 18. All outdoor ground mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and screened architecturally or with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 19. Reduce pressure principle backflow devices shall be required after all service meters. 20. The roll-up doors shall be constructed and painted to harmonize with the center, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 21. No temporary structures, such as office trailers shall be permitted on-site. ..... 22. The satellite dish area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly appearance at all times. 23. No ground mounted satellite dish shall be higher than the proposed building. 24. Any future proposal to divide the property will require the filing of a parcel map. 410 Page 15 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 Enqineering De?artment Conditions 25. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits. 26. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for building and sUbdivisions. __ 27. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.72 of the Municipal Code regarding grading. 28. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the Municipal Code regarding flood hazard regulations. 29. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.68 of the Municipal Code regarding floodplain management. 30. Meet all requirement of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees for encroachment permits. 31. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check for other than sUbdivisions. 32. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding fees, installation of improvements as a condition of building permit. 33. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-78 regarding public safety mitigation fees. 34. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-75 regarding fees for flood hazard review by Riverside County Flood Control District. 35. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore or its designee per Ordinance No. 529. ... 36. Annex to City's Lighting and Landscaping District. 37. Provide street lighting as required by City Engineer. 38. Grease traps to be provided on all surface drainage exits. 53. Ordinance No. 816 = Second Readinq Zone Change 87-4 - Rodney Pence. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 816. ORDINANCE NO. 816 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 0.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LINCOLN __ STREET, APPROXIMATELY 103 FEET WEST OF ROBIN DRIVE, FROM R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 87-4 - RODNEY G. PENCE). ~ ~ ~ N W m ~ ~ ..... Page 16 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 4ft AYES: UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 54. Report on Development Requirements, Environmental Impact Reports, and Economic Impact of Development As requested by Mayor strigotte. Council discussed sign standard concerns particularly with regard to Shopping centers, including monument signs, center identification signs and tenant identification signs (i.e. major shopping center signs listing all merchants in a center). Council also expressed need to include addresses on major signs within shopping centers which can be easily read from the street. Community Development Director Miller advised that the Planning Commission related similar concerns and suggested possible reduction of allowable sign area to prevent tenant directory type signs at the street. He also advised that the new sign code includes a requirement that monument signs provide the address in numbers a minimum of 6 inches in height. Council consensus was to have staff provide information on possible alternatives for signage in shopping centers Council discussed fencing requirements and specific concerns of senior citizens, with regard to solid fences and security risks. Requests from senior citizens refer to visibility limitations imposed by solid fences particularly in the infill areas. Council also expressed concern with fencing between residential and commercial areas. Community Development Director Miller explained that some problems are arising in that fences under 6 feet in height do not require permits and therefore are not always in compliance with the solid fence requirement. Council consensus was to allow for a change of fences in the older infill areas to resolve security concerns of senior citizens. Staff was directed to provide possible policy wording in the weekly memo for Council review. Council expressed concern with landscape buffers for major intersection and scenic corridors, and the lack of parkways and trees in the new tracts being built. It was felt that this was important to the aesthetics of the residential areas. Council suggested development of standards to be used with areas that would be designated "scenic corridors". council discussed screening requirements for roof mounted . , , 412 Page 17 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 air conditioning units. It was the consensus of Council to establish a requirement for ground mounted air conditioning units. Mayor Strigotte questioned the validity of Environmental Impact Reports being done on individual projects without addressing large scale impacts of multiple individual . projects. He questioned mitigation of these impacts particularly with regard to storm drains. 55. Council Committee Report on Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Sewer/Water Rates. ...., As requested by Mayor strigotte. Councilman Winkler advised that they had met with the committee again and the information they have requested should be ready by September 1. Mayor Strigotte questioned if this would include sewer rates. Councilman Winkler advised that this should all be included in the final report they are providing, which will also include information from the Blue Ribbon Committee. Mayor Strigotte requested that the following questions be submitted to the committee: 1) Is the water district doing payback on Capital Improvement Project of the Sewer Plant? Mayor Strigotte has been told "no", however the study he read stated that they were. .- 2) Is City capital Improvement money being used in the County area? It appears that City money was used for construction of the lines to Lakeland Village, particularly the Mission Trail line and the Palomar line. The Palomar line would appear to be in the County area not the City. He feels that Capital Improvement money would not have been used in this project anyway since it was federally funded. 3) What was the ratio cost when the project was originally sold on Scales Way? His impression was that the City residents would be paying more than the Lakeland Village residents, because we would have to be pumping our sewage uphill to that station. 4) How could the sewer fees be the same for Lakeland Village residents as the City residents when we are closer to the plant and we don't ~ have to go through the 10 or 20 pumping stations they do? CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Update on Public Works Projects. - I"- LD (\J W CD <t - - Page 18 - City Council Minutes - August 11, 1987 413 City Manager Molendyk gave and update of progress on the following projects and programs: Lakeshore Drive Landscaping, Four Corners Traffic Signal, Slurry Seal Program, Asphalt Overlay, Railroad Canyon/Casino Drive Traffic Signal, Lakepoint Park Phase II, Collier/Central Intersection Improvements, Machado Street Overlay, Downtown Storm Drain, Yarborough Park, Community Center Remodeling, Railroad Station, Sidewalk Program. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:06 P.M. A'rTEST: ~~ y~-~ VICKI ~y.~, CITY CLERK CITY GF--LAKE ELSINORE kliE~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE