Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-28-1987 City Council Minutes - I"- LD C\J W m <X - 283 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, APRIL 28,1987 ****************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Strigotte at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Winkler. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER,STRIGOTTE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS; NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, City Attorney Harper, Community Development Director Miller, Administrative Services Director Barrick, Public Services Director Kirchner, Administrative Assistant Rogers and City Clerk Kasad. CEREMONIALS A. Mayor Strigotte read a Proclamation honoring Helen Byrum for her service to the community in connection with Valley Crisis Center and presented her with a Key to the City. B. City Clerk Kasad administered the Oath of Office to new Planning Commissioner Pam Brinley. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Mr. E.A. Glasgow, 270 White Oak, expressed concern that street sweeping could not be effective if the cars are not moved prior to the sweeping. He also questioned the appearance of Lake Street and asked when it would be improved. CONSENT CALENDAR The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar for further consideration and discussion: Item No. 4 p~642 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: . a. April 14, 1987 - Regular City Council Meeting The following Minutes were received and filed: b. April 7, 1987 - Planning Commission Meeting 2. Received and filed Monthly Report of Investments - March, 1987. - 3. Authorized Advertisement for Bids on Collier Avenue/Central Street Intersection Reconstruction project. 5. Extended Agreement for Recreation Services between the City and the Recreation and Parks District for a period of 60 days. 6. Approved Ernst and Whinney as the auditors for the City and the Redevelopment Agency for the 1986-87 audit through the 1988-89 audit. 7. Approved Agreement for continuing membership in the Urban County/Community Development Block Grant Program. 8.. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights at 1403, 1405, 1407 and 1409 Pottery Street for Norik Bedassian. 9. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights at 120 Lewis Street for Charles M. Seward. 10. Adopted Resolution No. 87-22 relating to Air Traffic Safety, as requested by Mayor Strigotte. '-' RESOLUTION NO. 87-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO AIR TRAFFIC SAFETY. 11. Adopted Resolution No. 87-23 setting forth compensation for the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 87-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH COMPENSATION FOR THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY. 12. Approved date of May 12, 1987 for public hearing of the following: a. Ordinance No. 793 = Amendment No. 87-4 An urgency Ordinance amending Chapter 17.94 of the Municipal Code relating to Offsite Advertising. b. Ordinance No. 794 = National Electrical Code Adoption of the 1987 Edition of the National Electrical Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.38 to the Municipal Code relating to same. '-' Page 3 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 285' c. Ordinance No. 795 = Uniform P1umbinq Code Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.24 to the Municipal Code relating to same. d. Ordinance No. 796 = Uniform Mechanical Code -- Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.20 to the Municipal Code relating to same. e. Ordinance No. 797 = Uniform Housinq Code Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Housing Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.16 to the Municipal Code relating to same. I"- LD C\I W en <X: f. Ordinance No. 798 - Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danqerous Bui1dinqs Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and the addition of a new Chapter 15.08 to the Municipal Code relating to same. g. Ordinance No. 799 = Uniform Bui1dinq Code Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Building Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.04 to the Municipal Code relating to same. h. Ordinance No. 800 = Uniform Fire Code - Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.56 to the Municipal Code relating to same. i. Ordinance No. 801 = Gradinq Standards Adoption of Grading Standards and addition of a new Chapter 15.72 to the Municipal Code relating to same. j. Ordinance No. 802 = Uniform Swimming Pool, ~ and Hot Tub Code Adoption of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code and addition of a new Chapter 15.36.to the Municipal Code relating to same. k. Ordinance No. 803 = Deletion of Obsolete Chapters of the Municipal Code re1atinq Bui1dinqs i Construction Repeal in their entirety Chapters 15.28, 15.32, 15.48 & 15.60 of the Municipal Code. 1. Ordinance No. 804 = Requirements for Relocation of Buildings or Structures within the City Adoption of Requirements for Relocation of Buildings or structures and addition of a new Chapter 15.12 relating to same. m. Variance 87-1 = BMW MANAGEMENT (R.J. CHRISTOFF) A Request to vary from the front yard building setback of twenty feet (20') to allow a building at an average setback of sixteen and one half feet (16-1/2') from the p~64 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 property line. The project is located on the north side of Casino Drive approximately one thousand feet east of Railroad Canyon Road in the Shopper's Square Shopping Center. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Lakepoint Park Improvements - Phase II - Authorization to Advertise for Bids. Councilman Vermillion questioned why was is coming back to Council already, as he felt it should be held until Pacific Heritage has made a decision on what they are going to do. .... Mayor strigotte clarified that Pacific Heritage has advised it will be at least 10 years before they are ready to develop the subject property. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY VOTE OF 3 TO 2 WITH DOMINGUEZ AND VERMILLION CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTES TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ON LAKEPOINT PARK IMPROVEMENTS. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31~ Tentative Tract No. 20139 Revised = The Grayson Company A request for revision to approved Tentative Tract Map 20139 to divide 28.6 gross acres into sixty-three (63) residential lots and one (1) 12.1 acre commercial lot on the south side of Grand Avenue between ortega Highway and Macy Street. Community Development Director Miller summarized the devel- opment, and explained that the revision is due to some street reconfigurations and modification of lot lot sizes to meet current standards. He advised that the developer has requested some considerations including waiver of a portion of the capital improvement fees and a reduction in the front yard landscaping requirements imposed by the Planning Comm- ission, since he is constructing storm drain and street improvements in connection with the development. .... The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m., asking those in favor of Tentative Tract 20139 Revised to speak. The following person spoke: Mr. Bob Gray, 213 La Jolla, Newport Beach, President of Grayson Companies, Applicant, advised that he feels the revisions that have made will make this a more marketable development with 7,300 square foot lots and 30 plus lake view lots. He also explained that he would like the waiver of fees and reduction in landscaping requirements to reduce the overall cost of the project, since he will be making street and storm drain improvements in connection with the development. It was explained that his storm drain improv- ments would drain approximately 900 acres of property of which his company owns only 100 acres. Mayor Strigotte asked anyone in opposition to speak, hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:24 p.m. .... Council discussion center on concerns with waiver of fees, earthquake standards, and time frame for completion. Page 5 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 287 ~ Councilman Matson had particular concerns with Condition #21 relating to street sweeping mitigation fees; Condition #46 pertaining to payment of an equitable share toward traffic signalization at Grand Avenue and Ortega Highway; and Condition #2 allowing a two year period before the approved Tract Map would expire. City Attorney Harper clarified that the Council could condition approval on pulling of permits within a certain time frame. Mayor Strigotte expressed concerns with the time frame and waiver of fees as well as with the requirement that fault lines be shown on the Final Tract Map for information only. He stressed his feeling that earthquake standards should be strictly enforced. Community Development Director Miller clarified that they would also be required to provide a complete soils report ~ prior to issuance of building permits, which would show U1 tendencies toward liquifaction, or instability of the land. ru MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS UJ VOTE THAT CONDITION #21 BE CHANGED TO READ: PAY STREET SWEEPING OJ MITIGATION FEE REQUIRED BY CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE AT THE TIME <t BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE THAT CONDITION #46 BE AMENDED TO DELETE SUB-SENTENCE A, CHANGE SUB-SENTENCE B TO A, AND AMEND IT TO READ: STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION FEE IS WAIVED PROVIDED BUILDING PERMITS ARE PULLED ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 1988. ~ MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20139 REVISED, AS AMENDED AND ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: FINDINGS 1. This Revised Map is not expected to result in significant environmental impacts, based on Negative Declaration adopted July 24, 1984, which addresses all impacts associated with this revised Tentative Tract Map. 2. This Revised Map complies with the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Element designations and with the current Goals and Policies of the General Plan. 3. This Revised Map brings lot sizes into compliance with the current R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. 4. This Revised Map provides for improved lot orientation and circulation patterns to better facilitate the development and enjoyment of the subject property. 5. This Revised Map does not change the number of approved parcels or their proposed uses from that previously approved by Tentative Tract 20139. ~ 6. The developer is required to substantially contribute to an area-wide drainage facility which is expected to correct existing flooding conditions at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Ortega Highway and is, therefore, entitled to a waiver of Capital Improvement In-Lieu Fees from storm drainage construction provided building permits are pulled on or before May 1, 1988. p~880 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 7. The developer is required to contribute toward traffic signalization based upon the level of impact attributable to his development and is, therefore, entitled to an adjustment from an equitable fixed mitigation fee to a demonstrably equitable pro-rata impact fee. 32. Weed Abatement = Hearinq of Protests. To consider objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m., asking interested parties to speak. Those following people spoke: Mr. Ralph Greenham, 217 N. Kellogg street, advised the Council that he just got a permit to stockpile dirt on one of his lots in preparation for a project he will be working on for the phone company. The project to underground lines is currently awaiting a permit from the City, and he would like to be excluded from the abatement process. .... Mr. Joseph R. Hassis, 11845 Kitching, Moreno Valley, stated that he owns two lots near the channel. He informed the Council that on one of his pieces of property is so material excavated from the channel during the 1980 flood. He said that he doesn't mind it being there, however he does not feel it is his responsibility to pay for its removal when the City put it there. Mr. Al Perez, owner of a number of lots in Country Club Heights stated he has one lot which has been noticed for weed abatement that he objects to having abated due to the cost. __ This piece of property only has about a 2 foot strip across the front which would be abated. He also stated that he has had trouble finding a contractor to do the work, so he would like to be notified when the property is to be abated so he can go out and inspect the work. Mr. Nat Ambusales, Huntington Beach, owns five lots in the City and does not feel that people should be charged for the abatement. Suggested that inmates be used to clean the lots. Mayor Strigotte requested that staff work with the property owners to resolve the problems mentioned. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT. 33. Final Draft of General Plan Land Use = Ob;ectives To receive pUblic input and adopt these objectives for implementation in developing the Revised General Plan Land Use Element. Allen Manee explained the advertising process and contacts that were made with individuals in preparation of this final draft. __ The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Strigotte opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m., asking interested parties to speak. The following person spoke: - I"- U1 C\J W (D <( - - Page 7 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 289 Judy Magill, P.O. Box 1466, Lake Elsinore requested that consideration of personal property rights be given. She would hope that the city would not require property owners to donate their property for development of buffer zones and wildlife areas. Would like to see more specific information as it is finalized, and will be glad to see a standardization of rules and regulations so people will know what is allowed on their property. Mayor strigotte asked if anyone else would like to address this issue. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 8:07 p.m. Council discussion centered on concerns with objective #12 which read "No structure in any zone shall be erected which sUbstantially blocks the 'lake viewshed' of any other pro- perty - developed or undeveloped - which is adjacent or nearby". It was felt that the word "substantially" was too vague and the word "shall" was too absolute. Alan Manee explained that this particular wording has worked well in a number of other areas, and that the enabling ordinances the Council would adopt later in the process would provide a great deal more clarity. City Attorney Harper suggested an alternate wording that was more explicit and acceptable to Council. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AMEND OBJECTIVE NO. 12 TO READ, "NO STRUCTURE IN ANY ZONE SHALL BE ERECTED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION OF THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE LAKE VIEWSHED OF ANY OTHER PROPERTY DEVELOPED OR UNDEVELOPED WHICH IS ADJACENT OR NEARBY IS SUBSTANTIALLY BLOCKED. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ACCEPT THE REST OF THE OBJECTIVES AS PRESENTED. BUSINESS DISCUSSION MATTERS MAYOR STRIGOTTE REQUESTED THAT ITEMS 56 AND 57 BE CONSIDERED PRIOR TO THE REST OF THE BUSINESS ITEMS. 56. Commercial Pro;ect 86-7 = Amendment il = Center Development To amend Commercial Project 86-7 to include Design Review Approval OF Buildings "R" and "S" within Lake Elsinore Town Center, located on 18 acres on the west side of Mission Trail between campbell and Sylvester Streets. Community Development Director Miller gave a brief overview of the proposed amendment for the two free standing buildings immediately on the corner of sylvester and Mission Trail. Advised that the previously approved conceptual plan, E.I.R. circulation, grading impacts were considered originally. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project. Councilman Matson commented that thus far this is such a quality project, he is certain that the balance will also be well done. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT #86-7, AMENDMENT #3 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AND ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: pa29~ - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 FINDINGS 1. The project is a Design Review for two (2) buildings which are part of a previously approved project for which Negative Declaration 86-22 was approved. 2. The project, as approved, will comply with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and Zoning District in which the project is located. 3. These buildings continue with the same design concepts as approved for the center and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to section 17.82.070, including guarantees adn evidence to compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. ...., 57. Commercial Project 86-7 - Amendment #4 - Center Development To amend Commercial project 86-7 to include Design Review Approval of Building "N" within the Lake Elsinore Town Center, located on 18 acres on the west side of Mission Trail between Campbell and Sylvester Streets. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 86-7 AMENDMENT #4 SUBJECT TO AMENDMENTS AND ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: FINDINGS 1. The project is a Design Review for one (1) building which is part of a previously approved project for which Negative Declaration 86-22 was approved. ...., 2. The project, as approved, will comply with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and Zoning District in which the project is located. 3. These buildings continue with the same design concepts as approved for the center and complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other provisions of the Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. (Note: Items 56 and 57 were approved on one motion, however they are being shown separately here for clarity.) 51. Centennial proiect = proposal to rehabilitate the Railway Station. ...., City Manager Molendyk summarized the project and proposed funding presented renderings and explained that this would be a significant program for the culmination of the City's 100th Birthday Celebration to ~nd July 3, 1988. Page 9 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 29t Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with the cost esti- mates provided in the packet. Councilman Matson felt this was an excellant project and would provide a good source of downtown parking. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE DESIGN CONCEPT AND DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH -- PREPARATION OF A DESIGN PLAN. 52. Gediman Park = plan to redesiqn the park. City Manager Molendyk explained reasoning for the redesign plan as a method to alleviate loitering problem in the area. He also distributed a letter from the Downtown Business Association which stated that they would like to know the direction Council decides to pursue, however they would definitely like to see the park remain as a landmark in the area. ~ ~ N W m ~ Councilman Dominguez felt that for the last month or so the park has been clean and the loitering problems have been non-existent. Suggested retaining the plan as an option for later should the problem recur. Councilman Matson felt the new design would address a lot of the problems with the park, as well as providing additional parking and landscaping for the downtown area. Provided D.B.A. is happy with the plan he felt we should go ahead with the project. -- Mayor Strigotte advised that one of the reasons it is curr- ently clean and without problems is that one of the gentlemen involved in the problems is in jail. He also felt we should allow for input from D.B.A. provided their suggestions can be worked in to the existing budgeted figures. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY STRIGOTTE AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH DOMINGUEZ CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE THAT IF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN IS ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT TO D.B.A.IS INPUT, AND IT CAN BE WORKED OUT WITHIN THE BUDGET, TO PROCEED WITH THE PREPARATION OF THE DESIGN PLAN. Councilmembers requested clarification that this will be brought back if it cannot be worked out within existing budget constraints and without major obstacles. 53. Swick i Matich Fields = Discussion of use fees and maintenance costs for the two fields. -- City Manager Molendyk explained that this was an item referred to the Council Park committee, which consists of Mayor strigotte and Councilman Matson. As a result of meetings with the Park District Board the Committee recommended that the Council consider directing staff to negotiate a contract between the City and the Park District, for the district to be responsible for the administration, improvements, maintenance and operation of the two fields. It was felt that this would best serve the community as well as meet the objectives of the existing agreement. If this were the desire of the council, staff would aim for a target date of July 1, however it'might take a bit longer. Mayor Strigotte requested operation cost per year for oper- ation of the two fields be provided to Council. Mr. Molendyk clarified that those costs would be considered during nego- tiation of the contract. p~21o - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 Further Council discussion centered on possible use fees for other than City residents, possible split uses or alternate days. Concern was also expressed that we should be working toward development of new parks in addition to maintenance of older ones. It was clarified that this possible contract would help to eliminate to entities being responsible for maintenance etc. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO I, WITH WINKLER VOTING NO AND STRIGOTTE ABSTAINING, TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR THE FIELDS WITH THE RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT. .... Councilman Winkler added that he would like to have the contract considered on a year to year basis, with a target date set so it would conflict with Little League season. Mayor Strigotte suggested that this be deferred for one week to obtain facts and figures. 54. Special Events Ordinance = Discussion. Community Development Director Miller presented recommend- ations and outlined the various types of permits that would be included and highlighted the main characteristics of each type. Also requested Council's direction with regard to fees for non-profit groups and possible subsidy of various activities. City Manager Molendyk reemphasized the need for Council direction on fees to develop a standard which would be easily understood by all. Councilman Dominguez questioned people counts for major vs. minor event permits, and the 60 day maximum for events He __ also recommended that City fees be required of everyone, even for City subsidized events. Councilman Matson felt fees for use of City facilities should be dealt with in a separate resolution, as well as individually subsidized events. Councilman Vermillion suggested that the ordinance be clari- fied further that it would pertain to pUblic events rather than private events. Mayor Strigotte requested clarification of the suggested 60 day period and recommended higher standards for events where Alcoholic Beverages would be served, to include a clause for approval by the City Manager and the Police Chief. He also complimented staff for getting the framework for this ordinance on track. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0 WITH VERMILLION ABSTAINING, TO APPROVE IN CONCEPT THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE SPECIAL EVENTS ORDINANCE. Community Development Director Miller clarified that the Council would like all groups to pay fees unless addressed separately by the Council. __ 55. Ordinance No. 805 and Resolution No. 87-21 Adoption of Personnel Ordinance & Personnel Rules. Assistant City Manager Gilbert presented ordinance which would add a chapter on personnel to the Municipal Code and ,-.- ~ ~ N W m ~ ~ ..... Page 11 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 293 the resolution that would adopt the City's first personnel rules. City Manager Molendyk advised that these documents have previously been reviewed by Council and staff. Mayor Strigotte expressed concern with a number of points pertaining to probationary periods, reclassification, resignation, reinstatement, retirement notification period, and bilingual pay. City Attorney Harper advised that a number of the points being discussed are negotiations items and should be dis- cussed in that arena. City Manager Molendyk questioned appropriateness of open dis- cussion of personnel matters and suggested that they be dealt with by the Council, City Attorney and staff. It was the consensus of Council that his ordinance should be deferred to committee, and brought back after negotiation~ are complete. MOVED BY MATSON, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO BRING THIS MATTER BACK TO COUNCIL AFTER JULY 1, WHEN NEGOTIATIONS ARE COMPLETE. 58. Ordinance No. 792 - Second Reading. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 792 ORDINANCE NO. 792 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND COLLIER AVENUE FROM M-l (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO C-M (COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 87-1 ROBERT WONG) UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER, STRIGOTTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN:COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Requested that Public Services Director Kirchner introduce the new Public Works Superintendent Dennis Welch. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Winkler requested response to Mr. Glasgow's comment under Public Comments relating to improvement of Lake Street. Councilman Dominguez introduced new Project Area Committee member James Voight. Mayor Strigotte read a letter received from F.E.M.A. in response to a letter written by Councilman Vermillion. Pa294L2 - City Council Minutes - April 28, 1987 Councilman Vermillion stated that this letter really did not address his concerns. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:50 P.M. ~!(:~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - ATTEST: ~~~__~) 1 VICKI L~~~ KASAD~RK CITY OF.LA ELSINORE - - ~,