Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-13-1988 City Council Minutes MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 ****************************************************************** - CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Winkler at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Starkey. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Acting Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Miller, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. George Alongi, 649 Mill Street, expressed concern with the ~ City's policy requiring a Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights in connection with development, as he feels it is discriminatory. He suggested changes in the verbiage on the Quitclaim forms. CEREMONIALS/PRESENTATIONS A. Mr. Robert Newman representing the Veterans' Day Parade Committee advised that the Parade will be on Saturday, November 11, 1988 at 11:00 a.m. He detailed work in progress, read a letter from the Veteran's Administration decreeing the City's event an official government backed celebration, and encouraged Council and resident support of the event. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 8 and 11. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0 WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. ,.... 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. August 23, 1988 - Regular City Council Meeting. The following Minutes were received and filed: b. August 16, 1988 - Planning Commission Meeting. 2. Received and filed Animal Control Activity Report for August, 1988. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 3. Received and filed Building Activity Report for August, 1988. 4. Received and filed Structure Abatement Activity Report for August, 1988. 5. Ratified Warrant List for August, 1988. 6. Rejected and referred to carrier Claim No. 88-11 submitted by M.W. & M.B. Haskell on behalf of Skylark Airport. 7. Rejected and referred to carrier Claim No. 88-13 submitted by Essie L. Buchanan. -- 9. Adopted Resolution No. 88-51 - Designating Authorized Representatives to Prosecute Small Claims Court Collection Actions. RESOLUTION NO. 88-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES TO PROSECUTE SMALL CLAIMS COURT COLLECTION ACTIONS IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. 10. Approved Proposed Lease of Antenna site to G.T.E. and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement. site is located in the right-of-way of Hampton Circle. 12. Accepted Notice of Completion for Lakepoint Park, Phase II. Approved credit for 103 days to the project with acceptance of the twenty-nine (29) liquidated damage days at $250.00 per day or $7,250, and authorized this amount to be withheld from the final paYment. 13. Approved Final Parcel Map 22538 for property located on the __ East side of Machado Street, South of Lincoln. Accepted dedication of Underground Water Rights and dedication of Lot A for street purposes. 14. Accepted Quitclaim Deeds for Water Rights from Leonard Pantoja, James & Deborah Cantrell, Al & Barbara Brasile and Tony C. Schiavone. 15. Approved pUblic hearing date of September 27, 1988 for the following: a. Zone Change 88-7 ~ Champion Development. A request to rezone 0.73 acres from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial). Property is located on the southeast corner of Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street. b. Zone Change 88-8 ~ Winston Elsinore Ltd. Partnership. A request to rezone 1.57 acres from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial). Property is located between Casino Drive (Vista 'Del Lago) and Mission Trail approximately 1,000 feet east of Railroad Canyon Road. __ c. Tentative Tract Map 20296 Revised ~ Hillcrest Development. A request to subdivide 76.69 acres into 57 residential lots. The project site is within the R-1 Zoning District' approximately 2,000 feet southerly of Grand Avenue on the PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 west side of Ortega Highway, southerly of Laguna Avenue, easterly of Macy Avenue. 16. Adopted Resolution No. 88-56 - Declaring Intention to Provide Financial Assistance to the Lake Management Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 88-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 8. Traffic Control Resolution No. 88-49 - Establishment of Loading Zones at III and 113 Graham Street. City Manager Molendyk clarified that the Traffic Control Resolution for Loading Zones in front of 111 and 113 Graham Street, the staff report is incorrect as only one property owner is in favor of this request, the owner of Granny's Kitchen is not in agreement. He advised that this request came to staff through the Public Works Committee who suggested this item to resolve the problems compounded by the buses at Gediman Park. This is a safety concern and necessary to allow for the loading and unloading of business vehicles in that area. ~ Councilman Dominguez advised that the Public Works Committee is still recommending approval. Patricia Lovitt, Granny's KitChen, 111 W. Graham, advised that this loading zone would hurt her business in that downtown parking is already at a minimum. She felt this would drive her business to other areas of the Community. She suggested that if this is a hazard to the buses that the bus stop be moved. Mayor Winkler inquired what information would support this proposal if both property owners were not in favor of the loading zone. He requested Council consensus as to future consideration of this item. Councilman Dominguez advised that the Public Works Committee had reviewed the problems and had seen the delivery trucks double parked in conjunction with the bus stop and they feel one parking space is not too much to sacrifice as it can be replaced in the alley or some other area. Councilman Buck explained that on two occasions he had observed the delivery trucks lined up with buses behind them. The problem was not apparent without the buses but with the buses there is a visibility and safety problem. Mayor Winkler requested staff input. City Manager Molendyk advised that this recommendation was coming to Council directly from the Public Works Committee. Councilman Washburn expressed concern that both property owners were not in favor of the proposal. He suggested that it be returned to the Public Works Committee with input from the Engineering Department and Planning Department. Mayor Winkler concurred that he would like input from the traffic engineer to the Public Works Committee and return to Council. Councilman Starkey concurred with the concerns, but questioned alternative locations for the bus stop to alleviate the problem, because he has seen the problem with buses double PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 parking. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 1 WITH BUCK CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE AND DOMINGUEZ ABSTAINING TO RETURN THIS ITEM TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE WITH INPUT FROM PLANNING AND ENGINEERING AND BRING BACK TO COUNCIL WITH A NEW RECOMMENDATION. 11. Disposal of City Property - Reid Street. Councilman Washburn inquired whether clear title had been resolved for this property. He suggested if the title had not been cleared the item be held for consideration at a later date. -- Public Services Director Kirchner advised that the preliminary title report had been requested but not yet received. He suggested that Council could include direction to obtain clear title prior to negotiation of sale. OVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO DECLARE REID STREET PROPERTY SURPLUS, INSTRUCT STAFF TO OFFER THE PROPERTY TO OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AND IF THERE IS NO INTEREST, THEN SUBJECT TO CITY RECEIPT OF CLEAR TITLE ARRANGE FOR NEGOTIATED SALE OF PROPERTY TO JOHN A. CLARK FOR APPRAISED VALUE AND ALL RELATED EXPENSES. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. General Plan Amendment 88-4 and Zone Chanqe 88-4 ~ Brookstone Develooment. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Tourist Commercial to General Commercial and to change the zoning from C-l (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General __ Commercial) on 7.98 acres located on the east side of Casino Drive, approximately 800 feet south of Railroad Canyon Road. Resolution No. 88-50 and Ordinance No. 843. Community Development Director Miller summarized the proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment explaining that the change would allow for a broader range of uses on this site. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. asking those in favor of this change to speak. The following person spoke: steve Brown, representing Brookstone Development, advised that they are in favor of all conditions placed on this item and offered to answer any questions from Council. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-17, AND ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: .... Findings 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would allow a land use more in character with the subject property's location, access and constraints. 2. The proposed change will not result in any significant PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 adverse impact on the environment. APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-4 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88-50: RESOLUTION NO. 88-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE SECOND CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1988. APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 88-4 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 843. ORDINANCE NO. 843 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 7.98 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CASINO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET SOUTH OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD FROM C-l (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 88-4 - BROOKS TONE DEVELOPMENT). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE - 32. Tentative Parcel Map 23710 = Brookstone Develo~ment. A request to divide three (3) existing parcels into seven (7) new parcels on the east side of Casino Drive approximately 800 feet south of Railroad Canyon Road. Community Development Director Miller advised that this is the same area involved in the previous item and Business Item #51 for the Commercial Project. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. asking those in favor of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map to speak. The following person spoke: Steve Brown, representing Brookstone Development, advised that they are in favor of all conditions placed on this item and offered to answer any questions from Council. - Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:27 p.m. Councilman Washburn requested clarificatIon of concerns raised at the Planning commission consideration of this item. steve Brown advised that this was a traffic engineering concern at the intersection of Malaga and Casino and they had confirmed with Caltrans that they would not require a permit for this development. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AFFIRM NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-17, AND ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 Findinqs 1. SUbject to the attached conditions, the proposed Parcel Map is not anticipated to result in any adverse environmental impacts. 2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the General Commercial Zoning District. 3. The site, subject to the attached conditions, is suitable for this type of development. ..... AND APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23710 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Planninq Division Conditions 1. Tentative Parcel Map 23710 will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. 2. Development upon the lots created by this tentative map shall be connected to sewer. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" statement and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. Prior to recordation of a final parcel map, applicant shall comply with conditions of approval for Abandonment 88-2 related to a 60 x 20 (1200 sq.ft.) drainage easement shown upon the tentative map as a portion of proposed parcel No.2. Conditions of approval for Abandonment 88-2 ..... and Commercial Project 88-9 are incorporated by reference and shall apply to TPM 23710. 5. Applicant shall cause to be recorded joint driveway, ingress and egress and reciprocal parking agreements between all parcels shown upon the tentative map; additionally, those portions of the "Grant of Reciprocal Easements and Declaration of Covenants Running with the Land" made between Brookstone Development, Inc. and and Elsinore Investments, and recorded as Instrument Number 192247 in the Office of the County Recorder Riverside County, pertaining to reciprocal parking and access agreements shall continue to apply as they shall effect any or all parcels shown upon TPM 23710 and the Shoppers Square Center abutting said Tentative Parcel Map 23710; all Covenants, Codes and Restrictions or agreements shall be SUbject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Community Development Director prior to recordation. 6. All development upon the lots created by TPM 23710 shall be subject to Design Review pursuant to Title 17 of the L.E.M.C. 7. Grading, drainage, and landscape plans submitted for all parcels shown upon TPM 23710 shall clearly evidence the treatments to be provided for retention, sound mitigation and screening along the I-15 property boundary and the interior parking lot and building areas. 8. Access locations to the parcels shown upon the Tentative Parcel Map shall be subject to review and approval of the .... PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 9. City Traffic Safety Engineer prior to construction of street improvements abutting and parcel shown upon the Tentative Map; said approval shall be based upon a comprehensive engineered study of access locations along Casino Drive to be provided by the applicant's engineer or licensed surveyor and shall be accompanied by a traffic study which provides analysis of anticipated traffic generation by all existing or proposed businesses having access from Casino Drive between Railroad Canyon Road and Malaga Road. Applicant shall engineer and design the vertical, horizontal, and curve radii requirements necessary to correct the transition and intersection between Casino Drive and Malaga Road beyond the existing approved street plans; applicant shall agree to participate in a proportionate share with the City and other affected property owners in the construction of improvements to Casino Drive and Malaga Road, beyond the existing approved street plans, necessary to provide proper capacity, insure adequate traffic flows and improve safety. - Enqineerinq Department Conditions - 10. Dedicate underground water rights to the City prior to issuance of building permit, document can be obtained in the Engineering Department. 11. Sign agreement and cooperate with the City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District (Resolution 86-26, 86-27, 86-36); document can be obtained in the Engineering Department. 12. Hydrology and hydraulics study shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval for re-routing run-off to Casino Drive. 13. Submit a letter of verification to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to applying for building permit. 14. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 15. Work done under encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on street improvement plans and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and security provided for prior to recordation of the Final Map. 16. Public Works Improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer and include signing and striping plans and shall be subject to the approval to the City Engineer and security provided for prior to recordation of the Final Map. - 17. . Post required bonds or other acceptable means of security for public works improvements as established by the City Engineer. 18. Meet all requirements of Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code regarding encroachment permits, Resolution No. 83-78. 19. Meet all requirements of Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code regarding public improvements for buildings and subdivisions. PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 20. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check fee for other than subdivisions, Chapter 13.20 and 16.56. 21. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding installation of improvements as a condition of building permits. 22. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing ~ by Riverside County Fire Department. 23. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding subdivisions. 24. The applicant shall cause to be recorded an irrevocable reciprocal drainage, parking, circulation and landscape maintenance easement in favor of all lots, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. In addition, CC & R's shall be approved by the City Attorney and Director of Community Development which enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 25. Culvert under Casino Drive and tributary drainage must be provided for before abandonment or vacation of 60' x 20' rectangular parcel. 26. Contribute $15,000 deposit, prorated on the same ratio as provided in Resolution No. 83-61, toward widening of San Jacinto River Bridge at Lakeshore Drive at the time the building permit is pulled; if bridge is funded by another source, deposit will be refunded. .... 27. Contribute $22,683 for pUblic traffic safety impact mitigation fee for a traffic signal at Railroad Canyon Road and Casino Drive per Resolution No. 83-61. Riverside County Fire Department Conditions 28. Applicant shall comply with conditions/requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department necessary to support development upon the lots created by the Parcel Map. 33. Ordinance No. 844 - An Ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore repealing certain Code Sections and enacting Chapter 8.56 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code pertaining to Nuisance Abatement. City Manager Molendyk requested continuance of this item for two weeks to allow for additional staff review. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1988. 34. Shoppers Square Assessment District. Resolutions 88-52 thru 88-55. .... George McFarlin, representing the law firm of OrriCk, Herrington & sutcliffe as Bond Counsel to the City, explained that this is the next step in processing of this assessment district for funding of improvements. He explained that this district involves only one property owner and sets up a 20 year paYment period. Mr. McFarlin offered to answer any questions with regard to processing of this item. PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. asking those in favor of the proposed assessment district to speak. The following person spoke: -- . . Howard Palmer, property owner requesting this district, expressed support of this assessment district and requested Council approval so work can begin. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:33 p.m. city Manager Molendyk commented on the efforts of the development community to work with City staff to implement improvements which would benefit the entire community. He advised that this was a part of the City's ongoing Economic Development efforts. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 88-52 THRU 88-55 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 88-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-2. RESOLUTION NO. 88-53 -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-2. RESOLUTION NO. 88-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT. RESOLUTION NO. 88-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-2. George McFarlin advised that staff will return in two weeks with a Resolution of Issuance for the appropriate bonds, with the bond closing in November. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 51. Commercial Project 88-9 = Brookstone Development. -- A request to construct a 32,250 square foot commercial building as phase one (1) of a four (4) phase retail shopping center, on 4.83 acres located on the east side of Casino Drive approximately 800 feet south of Railroad Canyon Road. Steve Brown, representing the applicant, advised that they are in agreement with all proposed conditions and ready to begin work. Community Development Director Miller detailed the proposed project which is the second part of the Shoppers Square development. He advised that Brookstone Development has PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 purchased this property from Howard Palmer and they intend to continue the same building style and color scheme. Councilman Washburn inquired whether the screening required by Condition #31 would be visible from the freeway. Community Development Director Miller advised that based on the proposed elevation this should not be a problem. Councilman Washburn requested clarification of Condition #67 relating to certification of water system design. Community Development Director Miller clarified that the ultimate approval of the fire department would be required prior to issuance of building permits. . --- MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AFFIRM NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-17, AND ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs 1. Subject to the attached conditions, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. 2. The project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the General Commercial Zoning District. 3. The project, as approved, complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the General Commercial Zoning District. --- AND APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 88-9 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Planninq Division Conditions 1. Design Review approval for Commercial Project 88-9 will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued within one (1) year from the date of City Council approval. 2. All conditions of approval, except as modified herein, shall be fully implemented within the project design in all phases and/or strictly adhered to. 3. The project shall be constructed in substantial conformance with submitted revised development plans date stamped July 6, 1988, except as modified by conditions herein. 4. All required off-site improvements, 'including street lighting, shall be completed in accordance with __ improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 6. Applicant shall comply with City Noise and Grading Standards during construction phases of development. PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 - 7~ Design Review approval is granted for Building "D" only. Buildings "A", "B", "c" are shown in concept only and shall be subject to full Design Review approval with regard to building elevations, floor plans, site and grading plans, and parking. The developments designated as future car wash, future motel, and future shopping center shall be subject to comprehensive Design Review prior to developments. 8. Applicant shall record a parcel map that is consistent with the phasing plans of the center. 9. The project shall connect to public sewer. 10. Trash enclosures shall be redesigned to allow pedestrian access and constructed per City Standards as approved by the Community Development Director. 11. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major commercial uses and fast food restaurants. Placement, design and quantity shall be indicated on the final Landscaping Plan, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. - 12. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent colors, materials and specifications which will enhance the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. All signage including free-standing signs shall be by City permit and in conformance with the approved Master Signage Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of each sign. The Sign Program shall be consistent with previous phases of the Shoppers Square center. 13. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. Except for required security lighting, all exterior lighting shall be placed upon timers such that these lights turn off and remain off one (1) hour after closing to the following evening. This shall include building and parking lot lighting systems. No wall pack type lighting systems shall be permitted. - 14. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 15. All buildings within the center shall incorporate similar or compatible architectural treatment as indicated upon Building "D". Building "D" and all buildings shall reflect an architectural motif compatible in style and colors to the existing Shoppers Square satellite buildings. 16. Proposed restaurant uses shall comply with the parking standards provided in Title 17. Applicant shall provide a parking analysis for the existing Shopper's Square, Phase I agreement of 12 spaces and the report to reflect future uses in development. 17. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be contained in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 and using best construction practices. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken 30 days after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building Official. 18. All undeveloped and/or construction areas associated with the site shall be maintained in a safe and neat manner at all times. 19. On-site surface water run-off shall not cross sidewalks. - 20. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official. This plan shall clearly demonstrate the methods of . retention and treatments for the I-15 property line, interior drive aisles and parking areas and transitional driveways between abutting properties and public right-of-way; no portion of the parking lot shall exceed 8 percent in slope in any plane. 21. The toe of any slope shall not be within two-=feet (2') of any property line. 22. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. A detail shall be included in the building plans, subject to the approval of the Postal Service and the Director of Community Development. 23. Meet all State handicap requirements. 24. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two-feet (2') apart. 25. On-site directional signage/pavement markings shall be delineated upon the final site plan and construction detail sheets. - 26. All compact parking spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only". 27. Location of all transformers/utility vaults, risers or stands shall be shown upon the final site plan and shall be subject to Community Development Director and Southern California Edison review/approval; such facilities shall be housed in decorator masonry enclosures and shall be provided a landscape screen adjacent to said walls. 28. All ingress/egress drives shall provide decorative pavers or stamped concrete, the pattern areas shall have a minimum dimension of ten feet (10') and shall be located within the property boundary. .. 29. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within the affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. 30. Applicant shall submit a Final Landscape Plan that includes planting and irrigation specifications in addition to the following items, to be approved by the __ City's consulting Landscape Architect and the Community Development Director or his designee. a) Temporary turf or groundcover and irrigation shall be installed on all vacant building pads prior to release for occupancy of Building 3 (C88-9), unless building permits are obtained for individual pads. b) The Final Landscape Plan shall include screening of PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 - c) all transformers, backflow or metering devices and other ground mounted equipment. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb. Planting within fifteen-feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36") . Interior planter island shall be five-feet (5') wide and planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide a tree for every ten (10) stalls on each row. Irrigation and ground cover shall be provided. d) e) f) Twenty percent (20%) of all trees required within the center landscape areas shall be twenty-four inch (24") box trees. g) Planters adjacent to all buildings shall incorporate vertical landscape elements and color elements consistent throughout the center. Vertical landscap~ elements shall be provided within planters at rear of center. Extensive use of annual and perennial color plantings in combination with ground covers and accent miscellaneous rock, etc. shall be provided in center landscape beds near buildings. j) All cut or fill slopes in excess of three-feet (3') shall be planted and automatically irrigated as follows: h) i) 1. 100% coverage with a ground cover of a permanent variety. 2. 40% coverage or 25 shrubs per 1,000 square feet which ever is greater; 70% to be one (1) gallon in size, the remaining five (5) gallons. 3. Two (2) trees per 1,000 square feet or one (1) tree per 30 lineal feet, whichever is greater; 75% to be five (5) gallons in size, the remaining fifteen (15) gallons. k) All cut or filled slopes shall be provided with ground cover and automatic irrigation as established by the City's Landscape Guidelines. 1) Additional trees shall be added to the rear planters adjacent to the buildings. 31. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six-inches (6") lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well and shall be painted to match the building. Evidence of compliance shall be included in building plans. 32. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director. - 33. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 34. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the building and shall be channeled to approved outlet facilities that cross public right of way under the PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 sidewalks. 35. At the time of grading operations, the construction and landscape superintendent(s) shall meet with City staff to review conditions and discuss inspection and final building release procedures. 36. Meet all requirements of the Riverside County Health Department. -- 37. The two (2) parallel parking spaces located behind building "D" shall be deleted and shall be replaced with a planter and shall be landscaped subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 38. The southerly driveway shall be deleted and relocated on the north side of the proposed Building "C", as illustrated in Exhibit "C", subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and the City Traffic Safety Engineer. 39. The applicant shall provide a ten foot (10') wide landscape planter between the easterly property line (I-15) and all driveway and parking areas. 40. The canvas awnings over the rear doors shall be deleted and white boarders shall be added around the doors which are consistent with treatments used on buildings within this phase of the center, sUbject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 41. The interior planter islands shall be increased in size to include a five foot (5') planter area and a six inch (6") curb on each side. The corresponding parking spaces shall be labeled compact. -- 42. Conditions of Approval for Tentative parcel Map 23710 and Abandonment 88-2 are adopted herein by reference and shall be complied with prior to occupancy of any structures shown upon C88-9. 43. The color scheme shall be revised as illustrated in Exhibit "M" to include white trim and white boarder and cornice treatments. The base stucco color shall be Fawn. The recessed areas on the store fronts may be painted a contrasting color subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. The window trim on the tower windows shall also be white. Evidence of these changes shall be included in building plans. 44. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. Enqineerinq Department Conditions 45. Dedicate underground water rights to the City prior to issuance of building permit, document can be obtained in the Engineering Department. 46. sign agreements and cooperate with the City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District (Resolution 86-26, 86-27 and 86-36); document can be obtained in the Engineering Department. 47. Hydrology and hydraulics study shall be submitted to the -- PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 ,....... Engineering Department for review and approval for re-routing run off to Casino Drive. 48. Submit a letter of verification to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project prior to applying for building permit. 49. Provide street lighting and indicate on street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 50. Work done under encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on street improvements plans and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and security provided for prior to recordation of the Final Map. 51. Public Works Improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil engineer and include signing and striping plans and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and security provided for prior to recordation of the Final Map. 52. Post required bonds or other acceptable means of security for public works improvements as established by the City Engineer. 53. Meet all requirements of Chapter 12. 08 of the Municipal Code regarding encroachment permits (Resolution No. 83-78) . - 54. Meet all requirements of Chapter 16.34 of the Municipal Code regarding public improvements for buildings and subdivisions. - 55. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding capital improvement fees and engineering plan check fees for other than subdivisions, Chapter 13.20 and 16.56. 56. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 83-12 regarding installation of improvements as a condition of building permits. 57. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County fire protection. 58. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 529 (Title 16 of the Municipal Code) regarding sUbdivisions. 59. The applicant shall cause to be recorded an irrevocable reciprocal drainage, parking, circulation, and landscape maintenance easement in favor of all lots, subject to the' approval of the Director of Community Development. In addition, CC & R's shall be approved by the City Attorney and Director of Community Development which enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 60. Culverts under Casino Drive and tributary drainage must be provided for before abandonment or vacation of 60' x 20' rectangular parcel. 61. contribute $15,000 deposit, prorated on the same ratio as provided in Resolution No. 83-61, toward widening of San Jacinto River Bridge at Lakeshore Drive at the time the building permit is pulled; if bridge is funded by another source, deposit will be refunded. PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 Riverside County Fire Department Conditions 62. Contribute $22,683 for public traffic safety impact mitigation fee for a traffic signal at Railroad Canyon Road and Casino drive (Resolution No. 83-61). 63. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. ..... 64. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, or as acceptable by the Riverside County Fire Department, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 65. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 66. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. 67. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with __ the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 68. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 69. Install a supervised waterflow fire alarm system as required by the Uniform Building Code. 70. certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 71. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 72. Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system. 73. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are ..... reviewed in Building and Safety. Elsinore Vallev Municipal Water District Conditions 74. The project shall connect to public sewer and provide for appropriate water service capacities. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer requirements with E.V.M.W.D. PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 75. Submit hydraulic analysis for water line and facilities sizing to E.V.M.W.D. 76. A reduced pressure principle backflow device is .required after the service meter. 77. Develop a design plan and construct a residential fire hydrant per E.V.M.W.D. standards. 52. Residential Project 88-4 ~ John ~ Petersen. A request to construct an eight (8) unit addition to an existing six (6) unit apartment building located on 0.7g acres on the north side of Joy Street adjacent to Machado Elementary School in an R-3 Zone. Community Development Director Miller detailed the proposed project and showed renderings of the buildings. He also detailed the problems particularly with appearance and aesthetics, and advised that the recommendation is for denial. George Alongi, 649 Mill Street, spoke on behalf of the owner, and detailed the prior attempts to obtain approval. He indicated that in his opinion the City had delayed the progress of the project on numerous occasions. Lloyd Roybal, 506 W. Graham, presented and read the following report to Council: PETERSON'S PROJECT 88-4 - A) It is my understanding, when reading condition no. 20 that within 30 days of design review approval we are to develop a work schedule which: "...establishes task areas & completion dates in order to satisfy Nuisance Abatement pending..." This is completely acceptable to us, and we will gladly work in cooperation with the chief city building official to come up with an agreeable work schedule. However, the Community Development Director's report appears to ask for more than this. The last sentence of the first paragraph of that report interprets condition no. 20 as establishing a work schedule to immediately remove the construction materials, but does not allow us to leave that part of the materials which is intended for use in new construction. There is a definite difference in the interpretation here, and that's why I am asking for clarification. .-- B) The second paragraph of the report to the City Council states that we will build the proposed structure using painted concrete block. This mistake is understandable since the planning division's report to the planning commission makes the same error. In fact, we are NOT proposing to use painted concrete block. The material which we would like to use is of a better quality than painted concrete block, and so I would like to submit a sample right now. I would like to note that this sample before me is made of the same material as the majority of the materials that are to be abated. (Mr. Roybal passed a piece of the concrete block around for Council observation. ) C) The third paragraph of the report to the City Council states that the proposed carport structure violates the PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 building separation requirements of title 17 and that its proposed location is therefore "infeasible." On the contrary, I believe that it is indeed feasible (and workable and practical). On page 2 of the planning division's report to pianning commission, there was a suggestion to readjust the stairway location, which is acceptable to us. It is my understanding that under title 17, sect. 17.28.040, the building code defines carports as an accessory structure. Under section 17.28.130, SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS part 0, the code reads as follows: !' "Accessory structures may be located without regard to a minimum separation, subject to design review approval." _, Therefore, when we move the stairway & landings next to the main buildings the proposed carport location is in fact "feasible." ....IIi D) When working with the planning department on the site plan layout, open parking for the existing structure was not addressed. We can add four extra open parking spaces, though, by placing additional compact parking in front of each enclosed garage. In conclusion, I would like to thank the planning department and the city council for their consideration of our proposal. I would also like to add that I believe we have fully complied with the minimum design standards required in the city's title 17 ordinance. As the planning division's report states to the planning commission, we have provided painted wood siding with offset stucco panels. We have included a color-pigmented quality concrete block construction for the lower story, and we have provided a mansard style roof screen to be placed not only on the new structure, but on the existing building as well. We have proposed to upgrade the existing structure with paint, landscaping, and other amenities in order to present a cohesive and aesthetically pleasing appearance to the entire project. It is for this reason that we request city council and the redevelopment agency to approve residential project 88-4. Respectfully Submitted, Lloyd D. Roybal Roybal Associates Councilman Buck agreed with staff that these are not attractive buildings, however he would like to see the project finished once and for all. He suggested that if an improved landscaping plan were required he would approve the applicant proceeding with the project. Councilman Washburn questioned the abatement appeal portion of this request and inquired if those deadlines had been met. City Manager Molendyk advised that they had not been met, and clarified that the abatement action taken by the past Council __ had declared this property a nuisance and ordered abatement. Councilman Washburn commented on the public concern that the stored material be screened and improved standards should be required. He expressed concern that this is a minimum standards project and suggested that it be returned to the Planning Commission or denied without prejudice. ....IIi PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 Councilman Dominguez suggested that there be an added condition that the lot be cleaned up before occupancy is granted. Mayor Winkler questioned Council's specific direction to Planning Commission. Councilman Washburn questioned whether the stored materials would still be usable for construction after all this time. community Development Director Miller advised that the long term storage would make at least part of the supplies unusable. ,~ Councilman Washburn suggested either denial without prejudice allowing them to revise the plans and return to Council. He further expressed concern with the usability of the supplies. Councilman Buck felt that only the wood supplies would be unusable, but also felt that the Council should require the supplies to be screened. city Manager Molendyk requested clarification from Council since this property had already been declared a public nuisance and staff would normally proceed with abatement efforts. Councilman Starkey suggested that Council require resolution of the abatement problems before they are authorized to proceed with the project. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO RESUBMIT THEIR PLANS WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME, WITH SOME UPGRADING; THE ABATEMENT ~ PROBLEM RESOLVED AND MEETING THE CURRENT CODE. BUSINESS ITEMS 53. Aqreement with Lake Elsinore Animal Friends. Community Services Director Watenpaugh advised that this is the proposed final agreement between the city and L.E.A.F. and would run for a period of three years. He detailed previous Council consideration and requested that the following corrections be made to the proposed agreement: Agreement Page 3 - Item J. Delete the words "...and remit one-third (1/3) of license fees to the City quarterly for services specified in section 9 of this Agreement. II Agreement Page 5 - Item 4.b. Change the paYment amount from $5,131.66 to $5,416.66. ~ Agreement Page 7 - Item 9. Delete this section completely. Agreement Page 10 - Item 17. Add commencement date of Octoberl, 1988. Councilman Starkey questioned the clause in Section 4.b. which calls for paYments to be in advance. Mayor Winkler questioned obligations if the services are not provided. Community Services Director Watenpaugh advised that there is a 30 day cancellation clause to cover the city. City Attorney Harper advised that this would basically risk only one' paYment, and if necessary the City could place a draw on the assets to make up the paYment. Mr. Harper also explained that the up front paYment was necessary to begin operations, PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 however if Council desires, this could be changed at a later date. Councilman Washburn questioned the deletion of Item J, and questioned L.E.A.F.'s ability to take over the computer control of the licensing process. Community Services Director Watenpaugh explained that L.E.A.F will use volunteers to manually process the licenses and as of July 1, 1989 they will be computerized. Councilman Washburn expressed concern with the idea of going backward to manual bookkeeping when the City __ owns the computer software to continue the program. Ann Washington, representing L.E.A.F., explained that the volume of licenses is approximately 100 per month and there should be no problem completing them by hand. She also explained that it was her understanding that this was task the City would like to be rid of. She also advised that the payment could be changed from advance to following provision of services, after they had begun operations. Councilman Dominguez questioned when payment in advance could be discontinued. Ann Washington felt that this could be changed in 3 to 4 months. Councilman Buck commented that he felt more than one payment had already been spent by L.E.A.F. in upgrading the shelter and this was adequate insurance for the advance payment. Councilman Washburn suggested that L.E.A.F. work toward purchase of a computer as soon as possible. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ TO ACCEPT CONTRACT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT ITEM 4.b. READ AS FOLLOWS: IIpayments to be made monthly, in advance for 90 days, upon ...J presentation of LEAF's bill for services rendered. ~ . . .-11 MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH LEAF WITH THE CORRECTIONS REQUESTED BY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR WATENPAUGH FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD COMMENCING ON OCTOBER 1, 1988. 54. Lake Community Center Project Alternatives. Community Services Director Watenpaugh detailed the previous steps toward renovation of the Community Center and the excessive cost estimates drawn by the bid process. He explained the fiscal impact and staff's recommendation for demolition of the existing structure. Councilman Starkey inquired if there was not a use for the building as it stands and questioned the future plans for the site. Community Services Director Watenpaugh expressed concern with the costs required to either upgrade the facility or even maintain-it at its current level of operation. He also expressed staff's willingness to work with other agencies-- interested in taking over the building. Councilman Buck also suggested that this building be reviewed for other opportunities, such as lease to another agency or a business entity. Councilman Washburn felt that this building could be utilized PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 by the Community without being an expense to the City. He suggested that if demolition is not approved the funding in item #3 would all be returned to the Redevelopment Agency. Councilman Dominguez disagreed with trying to maintain operations in this building due to the costs involved. Mayor Winkler agreed that this building is costing the City money on a monthly basis and suggested that either an outside agency be found to use the building or the City pursue demolition. Councilman Dominguez questioned if Council should set a time limit. Mayor Winkler suggested that staff return within six months with a recommendation. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO DELETE RECOMMENDATION #1 AND THE WORDS "LESS COST OF DEMOLITION" IN RECOMMENDATION #4; APPROVE THE BALANCE OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIRECT STAFF TO WORK TOWARD GENERATION OF A POSITIVE CASH FLOW OR OTHER ALTERNATIVES AND RETURN TO COUNCIL WITHIN SIX MONTHS WITH REPORT. 55. Selection of Consultant for the General Plan Revision. Community Development Director Miller advised that four proposals had originally been received and after extensive interviews this group is staff's recommendation. ~ Councilman Buck inquired about the sound analysis portion and whether this had already been done and could be cut out of the proposal to reduce the costs of the revision. Community Development Director Miller advised that it had been done, but was currently out of date and due for updating. Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with updating this information when it could not be enforced. Staff explained that this is one of the seven elements of the general plan required by the State, and if up-tO-date elements are not in compliance, the State can limit the City's ability to issue building permits. Councilman Buck inquired if this $192,000 is a cost that can be anticipated every 5 years to keep our general plan up-to-date. Staff advised that there will be some costs associated with future revision, however they would be substantially less in that many portions of this proposal have never been done in the City. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE NEGOTIATION OF A CONTRACT WITH PHILLIPS, BRANDT, AND REDDICK (PBR) WITH THE FINAL CONTRACT TO RETURN TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. ..... 56. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 840. Relating to Cable Television Systems. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 840. ORDINANCE NO. 840 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AMENDING CHAPTER 5.40 RELATING TO COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION SYSTEMS. PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ...." 57. Second Readinq ~ Ordinance No. 841. Relating to Cable Television Service. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 841. ORDINANCE NO. 841 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RELATING TO UNDERGROUNDING OF CABLE TV AND PROVIDING CABLE TV SERVICES. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 58. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 842. Relating to Churches, Hotels & Motels in the C-1 and C-2 zones. ..... MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 842. ORDINANCE NO. 842 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.44, C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE), TO ADD CHURCHES, HOTELS AND MOTELS AS A USE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.48, C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE), TO ADD HOTELS AND MOTELS AS PERMITTED USES, AND TO ADD CHURCHES AS A USE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ..... ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Mo1endyk requested that tonight's meeting be adjourned to Monday, September 19, 1988 at 7:30 a.m. for the purpose of reviewing the J.P.A. regarding Lake Management. PAGE TWENTY-THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Dominguez requested that Public Works trim a Oleander Bush on Sumner street which is blocking traffic and take out a dead China Berry tree next to it. He also requested that staff convey his concerns about the smell of the sewer to the Water -- District. He additionally requested that Code Enforcement work to alleviate the garage and yard sale signs on Lakeshore Drive. He inquired when the flags would be placed at Lakepoint Park and the Chamber of Commerce Building and requested that information be provided at the next Council meeting. Councilman Buck reported on his and Councilman Starkey's review of parking in the downtown area. Based upon the businesses on Main Street there is a need for 588 parking spaces, in addition to 93 spaces needed for the existing restaurant uses for a total need of 681 spaces. The current parking spaces available in this area are 391 spaces. He suggested that Council consider two lots which might be available for development as parking lots, one at the corner of Sulphur and Spring and the other on Main Street between Peck and Heald. He requested that staff review this information and make recommendations for Council consideration. Councilman Washburn requested that staff contact the owner of Van's Laundromat and requested that the area be posted for "No Parking on Sidewalks", and if the owner will not cooperate, then the City should work to alleviate the problem. CLOSED SESSION None. ,-- ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 8:59 P.M. TO MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 AT 7:30 A.M. FOR THE PU SE OF REVIEWING THE J.P.A. REGARDING LAKE MAN~GEM~~. ~~?JUJ~ JIM WINKLER, CITY OF LAKE ATTEST:- - ~~2/2 ~TY CITY O~~ ELSINORE CLERK -