Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-12-1988- City Council Minutes r- ;.. MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JULY 12, 1988 - 7:00 P.M. ****************************************************************** I I ~ CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Winkler at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Washburn. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Acting Administrative Services Director Wanner, Community Development Director Miller, Community Services Direc~or Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS i J I 1. Katie Olsen, 127 N. Torn Ranch Road, expressed concern with a dangerous traffic situation in her area. She suggested speed bumps or other means be considered to alleviate the problem. City Manager Molendyk advised that Ms. Olsen's letter had been received by the City and forwarded to the traffic engineer for review as well as the Sheriff's Department so additional visibility could be provided in the area. 2. Frank RObie, Jr., 454 N. Kellogg st., Apt. B, commented on what he feels is a lack of law enforcement services in the Community. He also commented on recent burglaries in the area. 3. Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, commented on the Citywide Assessment District approved last meeting, and use of the City's General Fund. She expressed concern with the use of the General Fund and the hiring of consultants rather than use of City staff. CEREMONIALS/PRESENTATIONS None. CONSENT CALENDAR ."j MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: .' a. June 28, 1988 - Regular City Council Meeting. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 The following Minutes were received and filed: b. June 21, 1988 - Planning Commission Meeting. 2. Received and filed Animal control Activity Report for June, 1988. ,....... 3. Received and filed Building Activity Report for June, 1988. 4. Received and filed structure Abatement Activity Report for June, 1988. 5. Ratified Warrant List for June, 1988 6. Adopted Resolution No. 88-34 relating to Candidate Regulations for city Treasurer Special Election RESOLUTION NO. 88-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1988. 7. Adopted Resolution No. 88-35 relating to Authorization for city Manager to retain Consultants to assist staff in processing applications for land development. RESOLUTION NO. 88-35 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO HIRE SUCH CONSULTANTS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO ASSIST IN PROCESSING APPLICATIONS FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT. 8. Adopted Resolution Nos. 88-36 and 88-37 relating to Authorization for Proceedings under Mello-Roos community Facilities Act to finance certain public improvements and annual costs of certain City services for Tract Nos. 20472, 20704 and 20705. Also approved agreements for Bond Counsel Services and Acquisition of property in connection with the proposed services. RESOLUTION NO. 88-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (FRIEDMAN HOMES). RESOLUTION NO. 88-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING DESIGNATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS TO FULFILL RESPONSIBILITIES AND PERFORM DUTIES IN CONNECTION WITH PROCEEDINGS FOR FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ~ AND ISSUANCE OF BONDS. 9. Received Report on Lake Community Center Reconstruction Project and authorized staff to reject the bids received and explore alternatives to the project concept. 10. Approved Proposal for site Contamination Study from Academy Geotechnical ~ngineering in the amount of $3,700. PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 11. Authorized Release of the Faithful Performance/Labor and Materials Bonds and accepted a ten percent Maintenance Bond for Residential Project 85-16 - Buce1la Development. 12. Authorized Release of the Faithful Performance/Labor and Materials Bonds and accepted a ten percent Maintenance Bond for P.U.D. 84-1 - Thompson Investment. 13. Granted Extension of Time for Construction of Improvements Agreement on Parcel Map 21962 for T & S Development Inc. 14. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights from Robert Lynn, Sr. 15. Approved pUblic hearing date of July 26, 1988 for the following: -- a. Tentative Parcel Map 23411 = Aware Development A proposal to divide an existing parcel into eleven (11) parcels ranging in size from 20,000 square feet to 29,100 square feet. Project is located in a Limited Manufacturing Zoning District on the northwest corner of Dexter Avenue and Second Street. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Zone Change 88-2 = Neil M. Cleveland/Roqer ~ Epperson A request to change the zoning from R-R-O and C-P-S (formerly County designation) to C-2 (General Commercial) for 21.71 acre site located at the southeasterly corner of Central Avenue (Highway 74) and Cambern. Ordinance No. 836. Community Development Director Miller highlighted the request __ for Zone Change and displayed illustrations of the proposed development. The city Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. asking those in favor of the project to speak. The following person spoke: Neil Cleveland, applicant, 28465 Front street, Temecu1a, advised that they are in concurrence with all conditions set by the Planning Commission and Staff. He offered to answer any questions from Council. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:15 p.m. Councilman Washburn commented that when he was on the Planning Commission, he had requested additional work on this project, however he is satisfied with the project now. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-12, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findings __ 1. No significant adverse environmental impacts are anticipated to be created through the implementation of this proposed Zone Change. 2. This request to change the site's current RRO and CPS PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 -- (former county designations) to C-2 (General Commercial) is consistent with the Goals, objectives and policies of the city's General Plan. This project will bring the zoning designations, of , the site, into compliance wiTh the General Plan as requ1red by law. APPROVED ZONE CHANGE 88-2 AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 836. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 836 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 21.71 ACRES BOUNDED BY CENTRAL, DEXTER, AND CAMBERN AVENUES, WEST OF CRANE STREET FROM R-R-O AND C-P-S COUNTY ZONING DISTRICTS TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 88-2: NEIL M. CLEVELAND/ROGER W. EPPERSON) UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS -- 51. Industrial proiect 86-2, Amendment i1 = O.T. Eauities Ltd. II (James Thompson). A request to revise sizes and building locations for six (6) buildings consisting of 22,291 square feet on six (6) lots totaling 1.51 acres, located on the east side of Birch Street, south of Minthorn Street in the Warm springs Business Park in an M-l (Limited Manufacturing) District. Jim Thompson, applicant, 3804 San Dunes Lane, offered to answer any question from Council. Community Development Director Miller detailed the request and displayed proposed site plans and elevations. Councilman Dominguez inquired if this project would include medians. Community Development Director advised that medians were not included as this area would involve only local industrial park streets. ..... Councilman Buck questioned what appeared to be outside storage in front of the building, and suggested that future plans place the storage in the back of the project. Community Development Director advised that the storage and trash enclosures shown would actually be constructed between the buildings rather than in front. Councilman Buck requested that future plans address circulation within the project to make deliveries easier, possibly with alleyways around the project to allow access. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0 WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 Findings 1. Subject to the attached conditions, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impact. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the Commercial- Manufacturing Zoning District. 3. This project, as conditioned, complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 2. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. AND APPROVE AMENDMENT #1 TO INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 88-2 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Planninq Division Conditions 1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void unless Building Permits are issued within one (1) year. 2. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations and/or as modified by these Conditions of Approval of the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 4. All required off-site improvements, including street lighting, shall be completed in accordance with improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 6. Meet all County Fire Department requirements including emergency vehicle turning radius, and fire resistance requirements for all buildings including sprinklers where required. A letter sh~ll be submitted verifying compliance prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. Metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. A detail shall be included in building plans, subject to approval of the Community Development Director. 8. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. 9. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six-inches (6") lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well and shall be painted to match the buildings. Evidence of compliance shall be included in building plans. --' - - PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 10. Any food service uses to be permitted in this building must meet required parking in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 11. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by ~~e community Development Director. 12. All signs shall be by City Permit and shall conform to the approved sign Program for Phase I. - 13. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, Street Improvements Plans shall be submitted and must be approved by the City Engineer. 14. All glass on all buildings shall be non-reflective. 15. All paint trims shall be anodized or semi-gloss. 16. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be contained in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code using best construction practices. Interim erosion control measures shall be taken within 30 days after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building Official. 17. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 18. No exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. No wall packs shall be permitted. - 19. A final Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Chief Building Official. 20. A revised set of rear elevations shall be submitted for all six (6) buildings, exhibiting the same recessed striping treatments introduced on the front and side elevations, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Any buildings that immediately abut existing buildings will not have to have recessed striping treatment. 21. The loading spaces serving Buildings 1, 2, 5 and 6 shall be relocated adjacent to the loading doors as illustrated in Exhibit "G". .. 22. The project shall connect to sewer. 23. Where fencing is to be provided, redwood or cedar slats to be placed within chain link; however, sliding gates shall be installed and remain open during business hours to assure adequate circulation, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. ...... 24. Grease traps or equivalent to be installed. 25. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Conditions 26. Applicant shall extend water line to the site subject to the approval of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 27. Applicant shall connect to sewer, the size of the lateral to be approved by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. .... County Fire Department Conditions 28. The Fire Department is required to set a m1n1mum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 29. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible materials are placed on the jOb site. 30. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"X4"X2-1/2"X2-1/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 31. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. - 32. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 33. If required by the County Fire Department, install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the bui1ding(s). A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 34. Install a supervised waterflow fire alarm system as required by the Uniform Building Code. 35. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 36. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. .... PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 Enqineerinq Department Conditions 39. Dedicate underground water rights to the city ~rior to issuance of Building permit (Municipal C~de, ~1tle 16, Chapter 16.52.030), document can be obta1ned 1n the Engine~ring Department. Sign agreement and cooperate with the citY,in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District (Resolut1on No. 86-26, 86-27, 86-36); document can be obtained in the Engineering Department. Pay all improvement fees (Municipal Code, Title 15, Chapter 15.64). 40. Complete flood hazard requirements (Municipal Code 15, Chapter 15.64). 37. ~ 38. 52. Tentative Parcel Map 21587 = Heartland Group. Inc. A request for extension of time for a proposal to divide 40.76 acres into 53 lots in a C-M (Commercial Manufacturing) District located between Collier Avenue and Interstate 15, extending easterly commencing from approximately 1,000 feet east of Nichols Road. community Development Director Miller explained the need for a one year extension of time on this project. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO o WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO GRANT A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME -- FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 21587 TO EXPIRE ON OCTOBER 14, 1989. 53. Zone Code Amendment 88-5 = Industrial Concepts ~ Appeal of Planning Commission denial of a request to amend the text of the C-M (commercial Manufacturing) Zoning District to allow churches within this zone subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Steve Brown, representing the applicant, in favor of amendment for the Lutheran Church to locate in the Chaney Street Center, and commented on the staff report recommendations. He commented on section 17.54 of the Zoning Code relating to uses allowed in the C-M Zone and suggested that they were not incompatible uses to the church. He further commented on staff's implication that this uses up the commercial-manufac- turing facilities in the City and mentioned other areas where this was an acceptable use of the facilities. ~ Pastor Don Butenshon, Senior Pastor, Shepard of Life Lutheran Church, spoke in favor of the zone amendment and commented on other Lutheran Churches located in commercial centers throughout the United States. Mayor Winkler requested staff include in its report the procedure for reconsideration of the prior denial of Conditional Use Permit in the Commercial Zone. community Development Director Miller explained the request and the guidelines presented to Council based upon possible conflicting uses. He also explained the procedure for reconsideration of the Conditional Use Permit for the LakeshorejClement location considered last year, which could be done at the next City council Meeting. PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 Pastor Butenshon commented that due to a change in ownership the costs for use of the building have doubled over the ' current cost factor, so this building would no longer be feasible for the church's use. Councilman Dominguez questioned the time line for construction of the church. Pastor Butenshon advised that they have obtained the land, they are on schedule and should have the church completed in 18 to 20 months. He further advised that their intention is to make this a temporary facility. Councilman Washburn commented on the ability for churches to go in to most land use classifications and he felt that churches could be allowed in additional zones not currently allowed. He suggested that with the revision of Title 17, the appropriate areas for churches Conditional Use Permits should be designated. Councilman Washburn further commented on the request and the difficulty of this type of decision. He also commented on the need to condition the use permit on the occupancy of the building by this church only. Councilman Dominguez commented on prior Council direction to Staff to work with the churches to pick appropriate sites for churches. Councilman Starkey concurred with Councilman Washburn on the difficulty of this decision. He felt that this church was ready to move forward with construction and could meet the appropriate deadlines. He further commented on the need to consider future requests on a one to one basis, considering the temporary factor and how well it can be lived up to. Councilman Washburn asked City Attorney Harper if strict guideline criteria could be imposed to allow conditional use permits for churches, which would assure that the standards would be met. City Attorney Harper explained that each such request would be considered as a separate case with a separate public hearing and through conditions of approval and standards the Council can insure compliance. Councilman Washburn inquired if the termination of the conditional use permit could be tied to relocation into the new church building. City Attorney Harper confirmed that this could be included in the conditions for the conditional use permit. Councilman Dominguez inquired when the building permits for the church would be applied for. Pastor Butenshon advised that they should be breaking ground early next spring with completion by Christmas, 1989. Councilman Washburn questioned the number of members the church currently has. Pastor Butenshon advised that they have an average of 100 persons every Sunday. He further advised that they are also having difficulty in scheduling the Women's Club every Sunday and many times need to find an alternate location. Councilman Washburn questioned the possibility of daily activity conflict and traffic flow in the area. Community Development Director Miller advised that parking and traffic had been major concerns of the Planning Commission. Councilman Buck questioned the number of parking spaces available within 100 feet of the site. Steve Brown commented ~ ... ... PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 ~ on the parking which had been provided for the development at the rate of 1 in 330 standards. He further commented that they had a parking analysis done and there appeared to be no problems. Councilman Starkey questioned the current daily traffic amounts. Pastor Butenshon advised that currently th7 ~a~ly traffic was from 1 to 1 counseling only and most act1v1t1es would be conducted after 7:00 p.m. He suggested that the daytime traffic would require only 2 or 3 spaces during the day. Mayor Winkler commented that he feels this church would be eligible for Conditional Use Permit and that it would be temporary in this case. He further commented that the prior concern with conditional use permits seem to continue on an ongoing basis. He questioned suggested condition #1 in the Report to Planning commission and whether it should not be reversed to meet the City's concerns. community Development Director Miller explained the Planning Commission's reasoning behind the condition. Councilman Washburn suggested that this condition be reworded to require a mutually compatible situation in the grant deed. He questioned the CC&R's for this site. Steve Brown advised that there are no CC&R's on this development at present. City Attorney Harper advised that it would be difficult to provide CC&R restrictions which would not be too general. However, he suggested the fOllowing wording for the recommended condition: - 1. Provide restrictions on the operational hours of the church so it does not interfere with the other C-M users' operations. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 88-5 AS PRESENTED WITH CONDITION #1 AMENDED AS SUGGESTED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Councilman Washburn suggested that staff review the other use areas where churches could be granted CUP's (such as C-l, C-2 & C-M). Steve Brown requested clarification of the procedure from here. Community Development Director Miller advised that the pending conditional use permit application would go to the Planning Commission on August 2, 1988. Mayor Winkler stressed the temporary nature of this type of use. ...... City Manager Molendyk advised that previously Council had agreed to meet with the ministerial association regarding possible church locations. Councilman Starkey inquired who should pursue this matter, Councilor Staff. Mayor Winkler and Councilman Washburn suggested that Council make this contact. Council concurred. 54. Appeal of Condition of Approval reqardinq fencing for sinqle-familv residence located at 1301 Heald Avenue in an R-l District = Georqe Alonqi. George Alongi, Applicant, 649 Mill Street, explained his reason for appealing this matter and his concerns with solid PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 fencing in this area. He was primarily concerned with access visibility for the driveway, visibility for security, and high maintenance. He further commented that cost was not a factor as he has gone to more expense to obtain approval than the fence would have cost. Community Development Director Miller clarified that the existing requirement for solid wood fencing deals with screening of items stored in the rear yards. Councilman Buck questioned the safety concern with access visibility to the driveway. Community Development Director Miller advised that the code standards and height limitations would mitigate this type of problem. -- Councilman Dominguez commented that the wooden fences previously required by Council on Lakeshore Drive are eyesores. Councilman Washburn supported the use of wooden fences to screen back yard storage, and concurred with Staff's recommendations. Councilman Starkey expressed similar concerns to Councilman Buck with regard to safety factor, however, he felt Staff had adequately addressed this issue. Mayor Winkler supported Staff's recommendation for the purpose of screening back yards. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH DOMINGUEZ CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs ..... 1. The granting of the appeal would grant a Variance to Zoning Code criteria without benefit of proper due process and public hearing requirements pursuant to local and State Planning and Zoning Law. 2. Construction of the solid fence is just as possible as the proposed chain link fencing and offers better screening and aesthetics. AND DENY THE APPEAL OF THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL. BUSINESS ITEMS 55. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 834. Regarding Zone Change 88-3 - Century American. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO o WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 834. ORDINANCE NO. 834 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ~ REZONING 8.38 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND CASINO DRIVE (VISTA DEL LAGO) AT THE INTERSECTION OF FRANKLIN STREET FROM R-1 (HPD) (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - HILLSIDE PLANNED DISTRICT) TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 88-3 - CENTURY AMERICAN) PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ..... ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WASHBURN 56. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 835. Regarding criteria for Processing Vesting Tentative Maps. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 835. ORDINANCE NO. 835 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 16.25, VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS, TO THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PROCESSING VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Molendyk requested consensus on a date fGr~the proposed Study Session with the Sheriff's Department. After discussion Council consensus was to hold the Study Session on Saturday, August 6 at 9 a.m. Council also requested that Budget priorities be considered at this Study Session. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Starkey advised that the Chamber of Commerce will be sponsoring 67 girls from our sister city, Helsignor, Denmark, on a visit starting July 24. He advised that they will provide a drill team exhibition in the park on July 24, visit March Air Force Base on July 25 and spend a day on the beach in Lake Elsinore on July 26. He also thanked the Community, on behalf of the Chamber for its support of the July 4 fireworks display Councilman Dominguez requested that Staff remove the six dead pepper trees on Chaney, Davis and Flint Streets. ~ Councilman Buck thanked the Chamber of Commerce, Staff and the community for the July 4th programs. Councilman Washburn requested scheduling of Study Session with the City Planning commission and E.V.M.W.D. Mayor Winkler advised that he currently has a call in to the water board, so he will discuss the possibility of a study session with them. He suggested that the Study Session with the Planning Commission be scheduled for August 3D, 1988 at 5:00 p.m. PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1988 Councilman Washburn requested that Code Enforcement check on an abandoned vehicle at the Flint/Davis/Chaney Intersection. He advised the community that he had submitted the proposals for stop signs at Second and Dexter and Broadway and Dreidan to the City's Traffic Engineer for review. He further advised that the one at Second and Dexter was not wc~ranted at this time, but the school bus stop would be moved to help mitigate the problems. The other areas are still under review. Mayor Winkler thanked Staff and the Chamber of Commerce for the July 4th programs. He advised that the location Ms. Olsen was concerned with on Torn Ranch Road was being investigated for mitigation of the traffic problems. He suggested that the Study Session on August 6 include budget priorities such as downtown parking. He further suggested that Councilmembers Starkey and Buck act the the review committee for resolution of downtown parking concerns. ~ ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETIN T 8' 4 P.M. cJ;: JIM WINKLER, CITY OF LAKE ~~ST:,"" . J<LJ VI~~i:~ .D, CITY CLERK CITY OE"~INORE ..... -