HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-28-1988 City Council Minutes
-
ro
OJ
C\J
W
CD
<C
-
-
, ..~
. ."
225
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~EETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE.~'~,
130 SOUTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1988
******************************************************************
CALL TO ORDER
.......
The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by
Mayor Winkler at 7:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Starkey.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER '
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Mo1endyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Acting Administrative Services
Director Wanner, Community Development Director Miller, Public
Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Dick Knapp, 29690 Dawn Drive, requested information on delays
with the Country Club Heights Advisory Committee and the
limited participation by Committee members.
2. Frank C. RObie, Jr., Parks ide Senior Apartments, 442 N.
Kellogg 'st., Apt. 3, expressed concern with the City's
transportation system and police services.
CEREMONIALS/PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor Winkler read a Proclamation honoring Nancy J. Wright
as this year's Korn Memorial Scholarship Recipient, and
presented her with the Proclamation and a City Pin.
CONSENT CALENDAR
city Manager Mo1endyk advised that Item #10 should also have been
listed on the L.E.T.S. Agenda, so it will be listed on the next
agenda for concurrence.
The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further discussion and consideration:
Item Nos. 6 & 7.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. June 7, 1988 - Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting.
b. June 14, 1988 - Regular City Council Meeting.
The following Minutes were received and filed:
226
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINU~ES - JUNE 28, 1988
,
J
i
i
f
c. June 7, 1988 - Planning Commission Meeting.
2. Received and filed the Investment Report for May, 1988.
3. Approved Transfer of Funds from Unappropriated Fund Balance
for payment of Southern California Joint Powers Insurance
Authority Costs.
4. Approved Release of Regulatory Agreement for Grand Oaks
Apartments (Residential Project 84-1 -.Barclays Inland Empire/
Mark La Porte), and authorized the Mayor to execute the
release. .
-
5. Approved Agreement with Leighton & Associates, Inc., for
Inspection Services for the Grape Street Bridge. Anticipated
Cost $13,164.00.
8. Adopted Resolution No. 88-26 and Approv~~Memorandum of
Understanding with the Professional Administrative Group.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 87-17 REGARDING
COMPENSATION AND SUPPLEMENTARY BENEFITS FOR PROFESSIONAL/
ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY AND ADOPTING REVISED
COMPENSATION AND SUPPLEMENTARY BENEFITS FOR SAID EMPLOYEES.
9. Designated the Director of Public Services as the City's Agent
for Geothermal Well Reporting.
10. Concurred with Riverside County Transportation Commission
report to not provide Sunday Bus Service at this time.
11. Approved public hearing date of July 12, 1988 for the
following:
-
a. Zone Chanqe 88-2 = Neil M. Cleveland/Roger ~ Epperson
A request to change the zoning from R-R-O and C-P-S
(formerly County designation) to C-2 (General Commercial)
for 21.71 acre site that is comprised of twenty (20)
parcels of land. The project is located on the northerly
side of State Highway 15 between Central Avenue and Third
Street, South of Cambern Avenue.
ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
6. Agreement for Lease of Real Property with the South Coast Air
Quality Management District for property located at Lindsay
and Flint Streets.
Councilman Starkey requested that a condition be added to
require fencing around the entire property as well as
appropriate landscaping. He also questioned if the City could
afford to lease this property for one dollar per year.
Councilman Dominguez commented that he is familiar with this
facility and it will only be occupied when tests are being
run.
-
Councilman Buck advised that he had received numerous
complaints at this location. Councilman Dominguez commented
that this type of problems will exist anyway. City Manager
Molendyk suggested that fencing the perimeter of this property
would at least prevent trespassing and curb the problems. He
-
00
01
C\I
W
CD
<t
-
-
227
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 28, 1988
further suggested that the landscaping requirement would help
provide a more aesthetic appearance for neighboring
properties. f
;
Public Services Director Kirchner advised that a
representative from South Coast Air Quality Management
Agency was available to answer questions from Council.
I
MOVED BY STARKEY., SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY TO SOUTH COAST
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
7.
Lease Agreement for the Senior Nutrition Program.
Councilman Dominguez questioned which building was being
agreed upon for use, the Community Center or Lakepoint Park.
City Manager Molendyk advised that it had been formulated for
use of the community Center for now and if necessary could be
worked out differently in the future.
Councilman Washburn questioned whether the added stipulation
for use of the facilities, when the nutrition program would not
be using them, had been included in the agreement, as h~felt
this had been the intent.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH APPROPRIATE WORDING TO
PROVIDE FOR USE OF THE FACILITIES BY OTHER GROUPS WHILE NOT IN USE
BY SENIOR NUTRITION.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
32. General Plan Amendment 88-2 ~ Zone Chanqe 88-3 = Century
American Corporation.
A request to change the General Plan Land Use Designation
from PUblic/Semi Public to High Density Residential (12.1 -
20 dwelling units per acre - Condominiums; 12.1 - 24
dwelling units per acre - Apartments). Resolution No.
88-28.
And a request to change the zoning designation from R-l
HPD (Single-Family Residential-Hillside Planned District)
to R-3 (High Density Residential), on an 8.38 parcel
located between Interstate 15 and Casino Drive (Vista Del
Lago) at the intersection of Franklin Street. Ordinance
No. 834.
Community Development Director Miller explained the proposed
project and commented on the upgraded aspects of the proposal.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. asking
those in favor of the project to speak. The following person
spoke:
Barry Coddle, representing the applicant, commented on the
building background and financial involvements of Century
American and the work which had been done with City Staff and
the Planning commission. He offered to answer any questions
from Council.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m.
228
PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
Councilman Washburn advised that he would be abstaining from
vote on this item.
,r-
Councilman Buck commented that he feels this is an excellent
use of property being proposed.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
o WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT',NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-15,
ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW:
Findinqs
-
1.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would
establish a land use density and usage more in character
with the subject property's location, access and
constraints.
2.
The proposed change will not result in any significant
adverse impact on the environment.
3.
Granting of the requested designation will permit
reasonable development of the property consistent with its
constraints and more compatible with adjacent properties
and proposed development. --,
4.
The approval of the requested designations permits
development to the highest and best nature within
mitigable means to insure maintenance of the general
public health, safety and welfare.
APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-2 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
88-28;
RESOLUTION NO. 88-28
-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE
FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1988.
AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 88-3 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 834.
ORDINANCE NO. 834
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 8.38 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND
CASINO DRIVE (VISTA DEL LAGO) AT THE INTERSECTION OF
FRANKLIN STREET FROM R-l (HPD) [SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL_
- HILLSIDE PLANNED DISTRICT] TO R-3 [HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL] ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE 88-3 - CENTURY
AMERI CAN) .
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER
NONE
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
-
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
WASHBURN
33. General Plan Amendment 88-3 = George Alonqi.
A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element
.....
00
m
N
W
m
~
.....
~
229
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINOTES - JUNE 28, 1988
!
i
I
i
j
extending the Modified Secondary (80' right-of-way)
designation on Chaney Street from Pottery street
northeasterly to Flint/Davis Street intersection, changing
the designation from Major (100' right-of-way); and
changing the designation on strickland Avenue from
Collector (76' right-of-way) to a sixty foot (60')
right-of-way.
Community Development Director Miller explained the impact of
the proposed change on the traffic cirqu1ation in the area.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7.:28 p.m. asking
those in favor of the amendment to speak. The following
person spoke.
George Alongi, applicant, expressed
applicant for this type of request.
cases where staff concurs, it would
bring the matter forward to Council
the citizens.
conq~rn with expenses to
He suggested that in
be better for staff to
and save the expense to
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to the amendment to
speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:30
p.m.
Councilman Washburn question whether sidewalks would still be
required. Staff confirmed that they would. He further
questioned the concern raised by the Planning Commission with
regard to circulation. Community Development Director Miller
explained that based on existing development it would not be
feasible to place another street between Strickland and the
channel.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-16, ADOPT THE FINDINGS
LISTED BELOW:
Findinqs
1. No significant adverse environmental impacts are
anticipated to result from the proposed project.
2. The proposed Amendment is consistent with the Goals,
Policies and Objectives of the General Plan.
3. The proposed Amendment will not be detrimental to the_
health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood, nor injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood.
AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-3 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
88-28.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE
FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1988.
34. Budqet for Fiscal Year 1988/89.
Resolution Nos. 88-30 & 88-31.
230
PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MlNUT,ES - JUNE 28, 1988
~
i
!
,
City Manager Molendyk advised that the Budget as presented is
balanced and reflects the impacts of the City's current growth
factors.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. asking
those persons in favor of the proposed budget to speak. No
one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak.
Hearing no one, the public hearing was ~losed at 7:34 p.m.
Councilman Washburn commented that he feels the budget is a
good one stressing the most important needs of the city.
Mayor Winkler thanked staff for their effor~s to prepare the
budget and work with the Council and Finance Committee.
-
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88-30 APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1988-89;
RESOLUTION NO. 88-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
1988-1989 AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE
EXPENDITURES SET FORTH THEREIN.
AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88-31 SETTING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1988-1989 CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE XIII B OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE AVAILABILITY
OF INFORMATION SUPPORTING SAID DETERMINATION.
-
35. Amendment 88-6 = city of Lake Elsinore.
Amendment to Title 16, Subdivisions, of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code adding Chapter 25 pertaining to Vesting
Tentative Maps.
Community Development Director Miller explained the
terminology of "Vesting Tentative Maps", and the new State
requirement that Maps be in effect for a period of two years
following recordation.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at
those in favor of this amendment to speak'.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:37
7:36 p.m. asking
No one spoke.
speak. Hearing no
p.m.
Councilman Washburn questioned the two year period and whether
the fees and standards could be upgraded at which time a
project is extended. Community Development Director Miller
advised that the new law requires that the standards placed on
a development be maintained through completion of the project.
He further advised that with regard to fees it was not yet
clear whether they would be required to stay at the same
level.
-.oil'
-
00
OJ
C\I
W
CD
<(
-
-
23f'
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 88-6 BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
"'
Findinqs
1. The Vesting Map Ordinance is not a .project under
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based upon the
. fact it is administrative PQlicy formulation not expected
to have direct or indirect adverse environmental effect.
2. The Vesting Map Ordinance will bring the City's Municipal
Code on Subdivisions into conformity with State
Subdivision Map Act requirements and procedures.
AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 835.
ORDINANCE NO. 835
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 16.25, VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS, TO
THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR
PROCESSING VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
51. Industrial Project 88-1 = Frank Avres ~ Son Const.
Request to construct two (2) buildings totaling 27,213 square
feet on 2.10 acres, located on the north side of Collier
Avenue between Chaney and Third Streets in an M-l (Limited
Manufacturing) District.
Community Development Director highlighted the proposed
project.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
o WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-7,
ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW:
Findinqs
1. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval the
proposed project is not expected to result in any
significant adverse environmental impact.
2. The project, as approved, complies with the Goals and
Objectives of the General Plan and meets all the minimum
requirements of the Limited Manufacturing Zoning
District.
3. The project, as approved, complies with the design
directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
232
PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to section 17.82.070,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with
conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of
the property in accordance with the Objectives of
Chapter 17.82.060 and the Limited Manufacturing Zoning
District.
AND APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 88-l',SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Planninq Division Conditions
-
1. Design Review approval will lapse and be void unless
Building Permits are issued within one (1) year.
2. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to
the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy and release
of utilities.
3. The project shall be constructed in substantial
conformance with submitted revised development plans
date stamped May 23, 1988, except as modified by
conditions herein.
4. All required off-site improvements, including street
lighting, shall be completed in accordance with
improvement plans approved by the City Engineer prior to
release of utilities and issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
5. Applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes
and Ordinances.
6. Applicant shall comply with City Noise and Grading
Standards during construction phases of development.
7. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City Standards
as approved by the Community Development Director.
-
8. Meet all State handicap requirements.
9. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch
(4") lines two-feet (2') apart. All compact parking
spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only".
10. A final Grading and Drainage plan shall be submitted and
shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Building
Official and City Engineer.
11. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as to not create glare onto
neighboring property and streets, or allow illumination
above the horizontal plane of the fixture.
12. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program
for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent
colors, materials and specifications which will enhance
the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter 17.94. The Master
Signage Program shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission. All signage including free-
standing signs shall be by City permit and in
conformance with the approved Master Signage Program.
The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or release of
utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior
to the erection of each sign.
-
233
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUtES - JUNE 28, 1988
13. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant,
unless completely screened with solid screening from
public view to the satisfaction of the community
Development Director.
14. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six-inches
(6") lower than the parapet wall or top for equipment
well and shall be painted to match the building.
Evidence of compliance shall be included in building
plans.
15. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board
shall be used unless modified by the Community
Development Director.
l
Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend
with the center's design theme. A detail shall be
included in the building plans, subject to the approval
of the Postal Service and the Director of Community
Development.
-
16.
00
01
C\I
W 17.
m 18.
<(
19.
No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted.
All exterior downspouts and roof equipment shall be
painted to match the building, and shall be channeled
under the sidewalks.
Construction generated dust and erosion shall be
contained in accordance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code and using best construction practices.
Interim erosion control measures shall be taken 30 days
__ after rough grading, as approved by the Chief Building
Official.
20. A Final Landscape plan shall be submitted to the
planning Department for approval and include landscape
and irrigation specifications to be approved by the City
Landscape Architect. The revised plans should be
prepared and signed by a licensed Landscape Architect
and include the following:
a) The Final Landscape Plan shall include screening of
all transformers, backflow or metering devices and
other ground mounted equipment.
-
b) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (6") high concrete curb.
c) Planting within fifteen-feet (15') of ingress/egress
points shall be no higher then thirty-six inches
(36") .
d) 2" x 4" wood headers shall be used to separate all
turf and ground cover areas.
e) Provide vertical plant material along building "1"
unit A, such as Privets or Oleanders.
f) Replacement of Schinus Molle (California Pepper
Tree) with more desirable, less messy species.
21. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
234
PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
,
j
?
I
j
Department for inclusion in the case records.
22. Meet all requirements for water and sewer service of the
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
23. The existing loading doors on the property line shall be
closed in by a one-hour construction or a parcel merger
shall be required.
24. Applicant shall remove the existing, on-site billboard
sign prior to commencement of grading operations.
-
Riverside County Fire Department Conditions
25. Meet all the following Riverside County/Fire Department
conditions:
a)
The Fire Department is requiredto set a minimum
fire flow for the remodel or construction of all
commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
b)
Provide or show there exists a water system capable
of delivering 1250 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20
PSI residual operating pressure which must be
available before any combustible material is placed
on the job site.
c) A combination of on-site and off-site super fire
hydrants, on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x
2-1/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or
more than 165 feet from any portion of the building
as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. --
d) The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later
point in the permit process to reflect changes in
design, construction type, area separation or
built-in fire protection measures.
e) Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the
water system plans to the Fire Department for
review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall
meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
signed/approved by a registered engineer and the
local water company with the following
certification: "I certify that the design of the
water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department.
f) In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s)
must be area separated into square foot
compartments, approved by the Fire department, as
per Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
g) Certain designated areas will be required to be
maintained as fire lanes.
--
h) Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum
rating of 2A-10BC. Contact certified extinguisher
company for proper placement of equipment.
i) Final conditions will be addressed when building
plans are reviewed in Building and Safety.
~
ro
m
N
W
m
~
~
~
235
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
Enqineerinq Department Conditions
26. The existing concrete drainage swale to be in drainage
easement. !
27. Remove 6' concrete swale along frontage of Collier.
28. .provide for drainage of exi~ting pipe under existing
driveway.
29. Provide pro-rata share for design and construction of a
median on Collier.
30. Dedicate underground water rights to the City prior to
issuance of encroachment permit (Municipal Code), Title
16, Chapter 16.52.030); document can be obtained in the
Engineering Department.
31. Sign agreement and cooperate with the city in forming a
Lighting and Landscaping District (Resolution 86-26,
86-27, 86-36); document can be obtained in the Engineering
Department.
32. Submit a letter of verification to the City EngineerIng
Department, from the applicable water district, stating
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this
project prior to applying for encroachment permit.
33. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing
by Riverside County fire protection.
34. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 571 (Chapter 12.08
of the Municipal Code) regarding encroachment permits.
35. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572 (Chapter 16.34
of the Municipal Code) regarding public improvements for
buildings and subdivisions.
36. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the Municipal
Code regarding flood hazard regulations.
37. Meet all requirements of Resolution No. 77-39 regarding
capital improvements fees and engineering plan check fees
for other than subdivisions.
38. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall
submit and receive approval of street improvement plans by
the city Engineer.
39. Provide three-foot dedication along property frontage on
Collier for right-of-way.
40. Pay pro-rata share of traffic signal at Collier Avenue and
Central.
52. Animal Control Alternatives.
Community Development Director Miller highlighted the
discussions and work which lead up to staff's recommendation.
Councilman Starkey question how long it would take for the
contract to be drawn up and implemented. staff advised that
they would begin work with L.E.A.F. right away.
Councilman Washburn commended L.E.A.F and staff on their work
toward this agreement. He suggested an annual schedule to
236
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
stress the educational aspects of the program.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ACCEPT IN CONCEPT THE PROPOSAL FROM L.E.A.F. AND DIRECTED
STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A PRECISE CONTRACT. IN THE INTERIM THE CITY
COUNCIL AGREES TO LEASE THE EXISTING SHELTER TO L.E.A.F. FOR A
PERIOD OF THREE YEARS AT A RATE OF $1.0Q PER YEAR, WITH ANY
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FACILITY ~EMAINING THE PROPERTY OF
THE CITY UNLESS 9THERWISE PROVIDED.
53. city of Lake Elsinore Landscape Guidelines.
A resolution to establish landscape guidelines and standards
for all development within the city.
City Manager Molendyk advised that he had been contacted by
E.V.M.W.D. with some specific drought related concerns which
need to be addressed, and recommended continuance for two
weeks.
....
MOVED BY WASHBURN; SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS.
MAYOR WINKLER DECLARED A RECESS AT 7:43.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 7:46 WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.)
31. Citywide Lighting-Landscaping Maintenance District.
(Resolution No. 88-27).
Jeff Cooper, representing the consultant, B.S.I., gave a brief
explanation of the proposed district and the calculation of
assessments, for the cable television audience. --
AT 7:58 P.M. MAYOR WINKLER CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING TO 8:00
P.M. THIS DATE IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER, 308 W. GRAHAM, LAKE
ELSINORE.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT 8:10 P.M.
WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT.
Jeff Cooper, representing B.S.I. explained the proposed
district and how individual assessments had been calculated.
He explained the 20% discounted assessment for vacant parcels,
and terminology such as equal zones of benefit.
City Attorney Harper advised that at present the City had
received comments in opposition from approximately 107 parcels
or 0.75% of the affected parcels/property owners.
The City Clerk reported approximately 80 letter in opposition
to the District and 2 in support which are on file in the City
Clerk's Office. Also reported were 6 phone calls in opposition
and 1 in support.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. asking
those in favor of the proposed City-wide Assessment District
to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in
opposition to speak. The following people spoke:
---
Lee Allen, 270 Avenue 9, L.E.
Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan Drive, L.E.
Ray Betts, 34600 Rye Court, L.E.
Cheryl Higley, 241 Driftwood Court, L.E.
-
00
OJ
C\.I
W
CD
<t
-
-
297
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL ~INUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
%
I
i
j
Barbara Roberts, 300 N.' Ellis, L.E.
Jo Koger, 16670 Arnold Avenue, L.E.
Wayne ott, 1021 Lake Meadows Court, L.E.
Lawrence Lindquist, 31773 Via Valdez, L.E.
Christine Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, L.E.
Christine Koman, 115 N. poe street
Jack Cohen, Attorney, 9720 wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills
Jerry stewart, 105 E. Flint street, L.E.
John Empson, 32825 Macy street, L.E.
Anthony Mazzeo, 20890 Alameda Del ~onte, L.E.
Doroteo (Don) Solis, 31783 Via Cordova, L.E.
Chris Marie, Mill Street, L.E. .
Irene Danon, 1956 Thoyer Ave., Los Angeles
Janice Trimble, 319 Avenue 2, L.E.
Cheryl Chavelli, 1101 Park Way, L.E.
John Cooper, 31759 Via Valdez, L.E.
Kathy Slausen ,
Allen Baldwin, 16496 Lash Street, l:;~,E.
Donald Ash, 1131 Mill Street, L.E.
Tony Schiavone, 780 Lake Street, L.E.
Mayor Winkler declared the public hearing closed at 9:40 p.m.
Jeff Cooper, B.S.I., clarified the calculation of assessments
and the types of projects which would be completed as part of
this district.
City Attorney Harper advised that based on the combination of
written opposition and oral opposition, there was
approximately a 2-3% opposition to the district.
Mayor Winkler clarified that B.S.I. had been contracted in
January or February of this year to prepare the Report for
this district. He further clarified that all previous action
on this district had been taken in open City Council meetings.
Mayor Winkler explained that all procedures required by law
had been fulfilled, including noticing requirements. He also
explained that under the constraints of Propositions 4 & 13
this type of assessment is legal. He commented on the
fairness of the now existing small assessment districts in new
areas vs. a format where all City residents pay a portion.
Councilman Dominguez commented on the importance of public
input at the public hearing level so Council knows their
concerns.
Councilman Washburn further explained that the City had
complied with all of the laws, and a vote of the community is
not required. He suggested that the assessments be reviewed
in the case of Senior citizens on fixed incomes. He commented
that in his opinion, this is a fairer system than having only
the city's new residents paying for an assessment district.
Councilman Buck commented on complaints he has received with
regard to lack of services and the improved services which
would be gained through this district. He requested Council
concurrence that 50% of each year's assessment would go toward
lighting the city's major streets. He further commented that
he feels increased lighting would be more cost effective than
an additional law enforcement officer at a rate of $125,000
per officer.
Councilman starkey concurred with other Council comments, and
expressed concern that he had not been contacted by the public
earlier, so he could base his decisions on more input. He
238
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
~
j
i
j
felt at least 50% of the money collected should be returned to
the public in the form of increased services.
City Attorney Harper clarified the options for adjustments to
the assessments. He suggested that if more thought is needed,
the final formula could be brought back in two weeks. He
advised that Council could also adopt specific exemptions,
such as Senior Citizens, if they desired to do so.
Mayor Winkler suggested that the first year assessment be set
at 10% with the City paying the other 90%. --
Councilman Washburn suggested assessments start at 25% or 50%.
MOVED BY COUNCILMAN DOMINGUEZ TO ACCEPT THEJFORMULA AS
PRESENTED AND REDUCE THE SENIOR CITIZENS' ASSESSMENT BY 50%.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOVED BY COUNCILMAN WASHBURN TO ACCEPT TkE FORMULA AT 25% FOR
THE FIRST YEAR AND REFER THE SENIOR CITIZENS' ISSUE TO COUNCIL
COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO SET THE FIRST YEAR ASSESSMENT AT 50% AND GIVE SENIOR
CITIZENS A 50% REDUCTION.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING
FOR THE FORMATION AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY OF A CITY-WIDE
LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT.
Jeff Cooper recommended that the Senior citizens issue be
handled separately, possibly with a rebate. Mayor Winkler --
suggested that he and Councilman Buck serve as a Committee to
work out this issue.
Councilman Buck requested consensus of Council with regard to
50% of the assessment being guaranteed to supply lighting on
major streets. Mayor Winkler expressed agreement.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
None.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Buck commended the local Sheriff, Fire Department
and Paramedics for their response and services in his recent
traffic accident.
Councilman Starkey encouraged donations to the July 4th
Fireworks Funds. He commented that the Chamber is still
approximately $700.00 under the required funds.
Mayor Winkler responded to Dick Knapp's comments regarding the
Country Club Heights Committee. He advised that Councilman
Matson had served as the Council representative and suggested
that Councilmembers Washburn and Buck work with that committee
now.
--
Mayor Winkler reviewed the process of choosing new Planning
Commissioners and recommended that the new members be Pam
Brinley, Bill Saathoff, and Al Wilsey. He commented that this
group of people would provide a good cross section of the
area.
.~
-"
CD
OJ
C\I
W
CD
<t
r
r
~ "'-"
239'
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 28, 1988
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4
TO 1 WITH DOMINGUEZ CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO CONFIRM THE
PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR
WINKLER.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY eUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY. COUNCIL P.M.
---",
AT,TEST:
~ .;. J.
~~'>;~ITY
CITY ;~LSINORE
.. ,," .
.. -~.
~ : ~,;
, '
~
CLERK
{
l
-.~