HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-26-1989 City Council Minutes
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 1989
\
\
******************************************************************
-
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Winkler at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Starkey.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, City Attorney Harper,
Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development
Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public
Services Director Kirchner, Planning Manager Thornhill,
Engineering Manager O'Donnell and City Clerk Kasad.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
-
Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan Drive, expressed concern with items 9 and
10 on the agenda. He felt that item 9 should be a slope
dedication rather than a street dedication. He advised that the
owner of the property at 16941 Ulmer has changed since the deed
was signed.
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
A. Appointment of Central Business District Committee.
City Manager Molendyk explained that this committee is the
result of Ordinance 875 receiving second reading this evening.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPOINT THE PERSONS TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMMITTEE.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez
.Councilman Buck
D.B.A. Representative Ellen Todd
D.B.A. Representative George Alongi
Planning Commission Chairman Jeff Brown
Architect John Ballew
CONSENT CALENDAR
, -
The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further consideration and discussion:
Item Nos. 4,6,7,8,9 and 10.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
.1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. December 12, 1989, - Regular City Council Meeting.
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
b. December 6, 1989 - Planning commission Meeting.
c. December 13, 1989 - Adjourned Planning commission Meet~ng.
\
2. Received and ordered filed the Animal Control Activity Report
for November, 1989.
3. Ratified Warrant List for December 15, 1989.
5. Approved Sale of City Property on Camino Del Norte, and
identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 377-200-016 to Ranel
Development Company for $200,000.00 cash with the provision,
that purchaser accepts said property with the recognition of a
potential lot line adjustment for street realignment.
11. Approved public hearing date of January 9, 1990 for the
following:
a. Traffic Impact Fee.
b. vestinq Tentative Tract Map 25281 ~ Century American.
A request to accept submittal for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map 25281. The project is located at the southeast corner
of Casino Drive and Franklin.
~
c. Tentative ?arcel Map 25347 ~ Cent ex Homes.
A request to approve a four (4) lot parcel map for
financing and conveyance purposes consisting of
approximately 833.3 acres of land. The project is
generally located on the south side of Mountain Avenue
(extended and west of Michigan street).
...
ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Award of Contract for Lakepoint Park Athletic Liqhting Project
to Pacific Electric Company.
Mayor Winkler requested a tentative schedule for work to be
completed. City Manager Molendyk advised that the project
itself would not take long to complete, however, the poles
will be ordered and take approximately 6 to 8 weeks for
delivery; and completion should occur in March or April of
1990.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE LAKEPOINT PARK ATHLETIC LIGHTING
PROJECT TO PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $191,286.00.
6. Resolutions Initiatinq the General Municipal Election
Process for April ~ 1990 ~ Establishinq Candidate
Requlations.
Mayor Winkler advised that for this election, the polling
hours will be extended one hour to 9:00 p.m. to allow more
residents the opportunity to vote. He further advised that
this extension of time is only for the April 10 election and
will have no impact on other elections in the City. --
Councilman Dominguez advised that the election filing period
will be January 11th to February 1, 1990.
Councilman Washburn commented on the cost of the election and
the expense of registered voters who do not vote.
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
Mayor Winkler requested that the City Clerk monitor the number
of voters who turn out between 8 and 9 p.m.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS 89-69 AND 89-70 INITIATING THE APRIL 10,
1990 ELECTION PROCESS.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY,
APRIL 10, 1990, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE
CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES AND REQUESTING THE
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONDUCT SAID
ELECTION.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE
OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE
AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990.
7. Enqineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits = Resolution
No. 89-71.
City Manager Molendyk requested that this item be continued
for two weeks. It was the consensus of Council to continue
this item as requested.
8. Resolution of Intention to Vacate g Portion of Hiqh Street,
North of Mill Street and south of Country Club Blvd. =
Abandonment 89-2. Resolution No. 89-72
Councilman Buck inquired whether access to individual
properties had been reviewed with regard to this item.
Engineering Manager O'Donnell advised that even with this
closure two accesses remain from each side.
Mayor Winkler clarified that this action is to set the public
hearing; and further consideration will be given at the pUblic
hearing.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-72 AND SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR
JANUARY 9, 1990.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A STREET EASEMENT AND
SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
-
9. Acceptance of Additional Street Dedication and Quitclaim Deed
for Water Riqhts = 17455 Sunnvslope.
Councilman Buck requested that the words "Street Dedication"
be changed to "Slope Easement" as discussed by Mr. Knapp.
MOVED BY BUCK, 'SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ACCEPT THE DEEDS WITH THE WORDING CHANGE AS REQUESTED BY
COUNCILMAN BUCK.
10. Acceptance of Slope Easement and Water Riqht Dedications from
PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
SinQ1e Familv Residences at 16941 Ulmer and 404 West Flint.
Mayor Winkler requested staff comments on concerns expressed
by Mr. Knapp. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that
he just became aware of this property ownership change this
afternoon, and needs to check it further. City Attorney
Harper clarified that this does not create a problem with
recording the document, and if further consideration is
necessary, the recorded document would be superseded and thus
a moot point.
-
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ACCEPT THE DEEDS FOR RECORDATION.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
31. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 i Zone ChanQe 89-7 - Rancon Realty
Fund IV.
A request to subdivide 22.67 gross acres into 11 parcels
ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres, and to change
the zone from C-P (Commercial Park District) and M-2 (General
Manufacturing District) to C-2 (General Commercial District).
The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Central
and Collier Avenues.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the request
and advised that the concern with regard to signage raised by
the Planning commission has been addressed.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. asking
those in favor of this project to speak. The following person
spoke:
Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, representing the
applicant, advised that they are in agreement with all
recommended conditions of approval and offered to answer
questions.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:24 p.m.
--
Councilman Buck suggested that a condition be imposed with
regard to traffic problems at the freeway off-ramp. He
suggested that they fund or bond for two lanes at that
off-ramp. He further suggested that landscaping of the
freeway off-ramp area be funded by this project.
Councilman Washburn expressed concern with the two year time
frame on the tentative map, and suggested that they be given
one year unless extended. He further commented on the
proposed conditions as follows:
Condition #12.b. - He suggested grass or turf be required
to eliminate confusion.
Condition #19 - Median should be as required by the City
and the City deal directly with Caltrans. Public
Services Director Kirchner advised that an agreement has
been reached with Caltrans already, however, Caltrans
does control all construction on Highway 74.
Condition #20 - Questioned the sidewalk specifications to
utilize seven feet. Public Services Director Kirchner
advised that this area would include landscaping and
--
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
allow for the possibility of a meandering sidewalk.
Community Development Director Gunderman further
explained that the design would need to be worked out
with regard to access points and level of usage. He
suggested that this be considered at the time of Design
Review. '
Conditions #42 - Suggested addition of Condition
requiring a Class II Bicycle Lane.
Councilman Washburn suggested inclusion of requirement for a
landscaping plan to address the freeway off-ramp and the
freeway along the back of this development. city Manager
Mo1endyk advised that this will require that the City work out
an agreement with Ca1trans.
Mayor Winkler questioned the maintenance of this type of
landscaping. Staff explained that this could be done through
the City-wide Lighting and Landscaping District. Community
Services Director Watenpaugh further explained that we are
work~ng on a master plan to address freeway landscaping and
alternatives.
Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with making a decision
for Ca1trans. City Attorney Harper explained that the City
can condition for landscaping of a specific area subject to
future agreement with Ca1trans.
Council discussion ensued with regard to freeway and off-ramp
landscaping and alternatives to accomplish it.
City Manager Mo1endyk clarified that we can condition the
developer to participate and establish an agreement with
Ca1trans at a later date. He clarified that the condition can
be done pursuant to a City agreement with Ca1trans.
Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, commented that they want
a pleasing appearance as well, however this is only the Parcel
Map and Zone Change and the landscaping could be addressed at a
later date.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO ADD A CONDITION #42
REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A CLASS II BICYCLE
LANE. (This motion was not voted on because it was decided to
continue this item to January 9, 1990.)
Fred Crowe, expressed concern that with the Ca1trans frontage
it may be difficult to provide a safe bicycle lane.
Community Development Director Gunderman expressed concern with
this type of condition, as it may cause difficulty for
recordation of the map. He suggested continuance of the map,
prior to placement of such a restrictive condition.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS.
32. Zone Chanqe 89-15 ~ Commercial Project 89-5 = Doctor ~
Irvani/Kenneth Brown.
A request to change the zoning from C-P (Commercial Park
District) to ,C-2 (General Commercial District), and a request
to construct a 21,000 square foot, two-story commercial
building on a 1.1 acre site, located at the northwest corner
of Riverside Drive and Joy Avenue.
Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised
that it is a departure from the nautical theme utilized in
most areas along Riverside Drive.
PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. aSking
those in favor of this request to speak. No one spoke.
,
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this request td
speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:03
p.m.
Councilman Buck advised that he is concerned with the revised
site plan which utilizes 15 foot setbacks for loading and --
unloading or turn around access to prevent blocking the
driveway.
Councilman Washburn expressed concern with crime and the
potential hiding places. He suggested lighting and a block
wall fence with wrought iron behind the development, but left
the final consideration to the Sheriff's Department and staff.
Councilman Dominguez inquired whether it would be appropriate
to condition the developer to install a burglar alarm as part
of the project. City Attorney Harper advised that the City
presently does not have an ordinance under which such a
condition could be imposed.
Councilman Starkey commented on the insurance breaks available
to businesses that have burglar alarms and the benefit such an
ordinance might be.
city Attorney Harper advised that there is no statute which
would address burglar alarms. He further advised that prior
to imposition of such a condition the City's ordinance would
need to be amended. He commented on the difficulty in
enforcement after the building has been built and inspected.
Councilman Dominguez suggested requiring the appropriate
wiring for an alarm system at the time of construction
--
Mayor Winkler acknowledged the lack of grounds for imposition
of such a requirement, however, he requested that an ordinance
be prepared as soon as possible to address this concern
Councilman Washburn questioned Condition #23.b. and expressed
concern with the removal of mature trees for this development.
He recommended requiring specimen trees or 24" box trees; with
item 23.e. being changed from "15 years" to "5 years".
Councilman Washburn requested inclusion of a Condition #61
requiring a Class 2 Bicycle Lane.
City Manager Molendyk suggested with regard to the trees, that
Council consider development of guidelines with regard to
sizes of trees and coverage reasonable growth time frames.
Councilman Washburn suggested that the verbiage "7 years or
less" be used for growth coverage.
Councilman starkey commented that he was pleased with
Condition 49 which requires money toward placement of the
traffic signal at Joy Street and Riverside Drive.
--
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADD CONDITION #61 REQUIRING THAT THE APPLICANT DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT A CLASS 2 BICYCLE LANE.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CHANGE CONDITION #23.b. FROM 15 GALLON TREES TO 24" BOX TREES.
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
MOVED BY WASHBURN TO CHANGE CONDITION #23.e. FROM 15 YEARS TO 7
YEARS OR SOONER. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND.,
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1
WITH WASHBURN CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO CHANGE CONDITION
#23.e. FROM 15 YEARS TO 10 YEARS.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADD CONDITION #62 TO REQUIRE A REAR WALL TO BE REVIEWED BY
THE SHERIFF AND STAFF FOR APPROPRIATE MATERIAL TO INCREASE
TENANT SAFETY.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-33, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED
BELOW:
Findings = Zone Chanqe 89-15
1. No environmental impacts are anticipated as a result
of the project.
2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the General
Plan.
3. Government Code Section 65860 requires that zoning be
consistent with the General Plan.
4. Although he proposed zoning is inconsistent with
the proposed General Plan Designation a finding of
associated environmental impacts can not be made.
Findinqs = Commercial proiect 89-5
1. The project is consistent with the Goals, Policies
and Objectives of the General Plan.
2. If the attached Conditions of Approval are met the
project will meet the design and development
requirements of Chapters 17.18, 17.38 and 17.82 of
the Municipal Code.
3. Approval of Commercial Project 89-5 is contingent
upon approval of Zone Change 89-15.
4. Negative Declaration 89-33 has been prepared for this
project based on the findings that no environmental
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-5, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Planninq Divisions Conditions
1. Approval of Commercial Project 89-5 is contingent
upon the approval of Zone Change 89-15.
2. Design Review Approval for Commercial Project 89-5
will lapse and be void unless building permits are
issued within one (1) year from the date of City
council approval.
3. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented
within the project design in all phases and/or
adhered to strictly.
4. Full compliance of all Conditions of Approval shall
occur, to the satisfaction of the City, prior to the
PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and release
of utilities.
5. Applicant shall meet all applicable 'City Codes and
Ordinances.
6. All required off-site improvements shall be completed
in accordance with improvement plans approved by the
City Engineer prior to release of utilities and
issuance of certificate of Occupancy.
7. All site improvements shall be constructed as --
indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations.
Revisions to approved site plans or building
elevations shall be subject to Design Review. All
plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check
shall conform with the submitted plans as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission
through subsequent action.
8. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board
shall be used unless modified by the Community
Development Director or his designee.
9. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department for inclusion in the case records.
10. A revised plot plan and elevations shall be submitted
to the Planning and Building Departments by the
applicant prior to Building Division issuance of
permits which reflects all conditions of approval.
This revised plot plan shall become the approved plot
plan only upon the review and approval by the
Community Development Director.
--
11. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the
City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated
dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance
with the provision of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72
and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion
control measures shall be provided 30 days after the
site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer.
12. All undeveloped and/or construction areas associated
with he site shall be maintained in a safe and neat
manner at all times.
13. Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise
Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to
the hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday
to protect adjacent occupants from unreasonable noise
and glare associated with construction.
14. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
15. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City
standards as approved by the Community Development
Director. ..
16. No roof ladders shall be permitted.
17. All mechanical and electrical equipment of the
building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground
or wall mounted utility equipment shall be
consolidated in a central location and
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
architecturally screened along with substantial
landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director.
18. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the
building. ,
,
19. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to
blend with the center's design theme. Mailboxes
shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance
of building permits, subject to the approval of the
postal service and the Community Development Director
or his designee.
20. Brick pavers or texture pavement treatments shall be
laid in bank designs and shall be located at the
driveway approaches and crosswalks.
21. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major
commercial uses. Placement, design and quantity
shall be indicated on the final landscaping plan, and
subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
22. Project must meet all requirements of Cal-Trans.
23. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be
reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape
Architect Consultant for a $100.00 per plan fee, and
the Community Development Director or his designee.
-
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and
automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering
coverage.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from
the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30-feet
apart and at least 24" box in size, as approved
by the Community Development Director.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (6") high and six-inch (6")
wide concrete curb.
-
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of
ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an
appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide
for 50% parking lot shading in ten years.
Irrigation and ground covers shall also be
provided.
f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and
screened as part of the landscaping plan.
g) The Landscape plan shall provide for ground
cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all
requirements of the city's adopted Landscape
Guidelines. .
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at
completion of installation of landscape
requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100%
for material and labor for one (1) year.
PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
i)
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
within affected portion of any phase at the time
a certificate of Occupancy is requested for any
building.
"
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with \
approved site plan.
k) Use plant materials for ground cover rather than
lava rock.
-
1) Final landscape plans to include planting and
irrigation details.
24. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets or allow
illumination above the horizontal plane of the
fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the
architecture of the building.
25. Any security lighting located on-site shall be
ornamental and shall be shown on building plans,
subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
26. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program
for the center which specifies harmonious and
consistent colors, materials and specifications which
will enhance the center's design and meet the
provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
approved by the Planning Commission. All signage
including free-standing signs shall be by City Permit
and in conformance with the approved Master Signage
Program. The Master Signage Program shall be
approved prior to issuance of Certificate of --
Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign
permits are required prior to the erection of each
sign.
27. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all
requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water and
sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all
district conditions and standards.
28. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be
subject to the approval of the Chief Building
Official.
29. The design and construction of the project shall meet
all County Fire Department standards for fire
protection and shall include any additional
requirements requested by the Fire Marshal. A fire
detector check assembly shall be required for any
interior fire lines and hydrants.
30. Only Class "A" fire retardant roofing materials are
to be used.
31. Meet all requirements of the Riverside County Health --
Department.
32. Meet all state handicap requirements.
33. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch
(4") lines two-feet (2') apart.
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
34. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all
internal one-way drive aisles.
Enqineerinq Department:
35. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with
as a condition of development as specified in the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building
permit is issued.
36. Construct all public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12), which must
be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
approval of final map (L.E.M.C. 16.34).
37. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a civil; engineer and improvements shall
be to Riverside County Road Department standards and
City Codes (L.E.M.C. 12.04 and 16.34).
38. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of public works off-site improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78).
39. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
40. Dedicate a corner cut-back at the northerly corner
per Riverside County Standard 805.
41. Dedicate 20 foot along southeast property line for
additional right-Of-way for Riverside Drive.
42. Dedicate 3 foot along southeast property line for
additional right-Of-way for Joy Avenue.
43. Submit a letter of verification "will-serve" letter
to the City Engineering Department, from the
applicable water district stating water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project prior to
applying for building permits.
44. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a pUblic
facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a
letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
45. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
No. 85-26).
46. All natural drainage traversing site shall be
conveyed through site or provided for by a method
approved by the City Engineer.
47. Applicant shall construct a catch basin on Joy street
and provide storm drain system in Joy Avenue, subject
to the approval of the City Engineer.
48. Driveway on Riverside Drive shall be right-turn in
and right-turn out only.
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
49. Applicant shall contribute $3,946.00 for the traffic
signal a Joy and Riverside Drive per. Resolution
83-49.
50. Applicant shall meet all requirements of Cal-Trans
and obtain any necessary permits from Cal-Trans.
51. contribute $6,987.00 for the design and construction
of half (1/2) a median on Riverside Drive along
abutting property line.
-
52. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior
to building permit, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.20) .
53. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie-notes delineated on 8-1/2" x
11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering
Department before final inspection of off-site
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
54. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County fire protection.
55. Provide street lighting and indicate on street
improvement plans as required by City Engineer.
56. Enter into a subdivision agreement with the City for
off-site improvements an post appropriate bonds.
57. contribute $124.00 for the City-wide Entry Sign
Program.
58. Arrangements for relocation of utility company
facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
59. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site
easements for off-site grading from adjacent property
owners prior to grading permit.
......
60. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a
Mello Rood Community Facilities District (CFD) for
infrastructure improvement and operation and
maintenance for the West Elsinore Infrastructure
Improvement District.
61. Design and construct a Class II Bicycle Lane
62. Provide rear block wall fence to be reviewed by
Sheriff and staff for appropriate material to
increase visibility and tenant safety
APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-15 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 878:
ORDINANCE NO. 878
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 1.24 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND JOY AVENUE, FROM C-P (COMMERCIAL
PARK DISTRICT) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) (ZONE CHANGE
89-15 - IRVANI/BROWN).
---
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
~
\
\
33. Tentative Parcel Map 25157 - Bainbridge Investments, Inc.
A request to create five (5) parcels from a 5.4 net acre site
ranging in size from .49 acres to 2.04 acres at the northwest
corner of Riverside and Lakeshore Drives. The site is zoned
Neighborhood Commercial District.
Community Development Director Gunderman explained this
request.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the pUblic hearing at 8:23 p.m. asking
those in favor of Tentative Parcel Map 25157 to speak. The
following person spoke:
Saeed Shahidzadeh, Bainbridge Investments, advised that they
are in concurrence with all proposed conditions of approval
and offered to answer questions.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 8:24 p.m.
Councilman Washburn questioned the variable between two year
time limits vs. one year. Community Development Director
Gunderman explained that Design Review cases are 1 year and
Parcel Map cases are 2 years under the Subdivision Map Act.
Councilman Washburn commented on the Planning commission's
concerns with regard to traffic, and suggested that Condition
#27 be amended with "..approval subject to engineering
analysis. II
Community Development Director Gunderman suggested the
Condition "No other access from Riverside Drive except as
shown, unless approved in the design review process," as this
would provide some flexibility.
Councilman Buck felt that the plan is too restrictive,
particularly with a 270 foot strip of frontage with no access.
Council discussion ensued with regard to access to each lot;
necessary reciprocal easements and alternatives for approval.
Community Development Director Gunderman clarified options of
1) deny the map or 2) send the matter back to the Planning
Commission with direction or indications of the concerns and
request reconsideration. City Attorney Harper further
clarified the legal options.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO REFER THIS ITEM BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW.
City Manager Molendyk requested clarification with regard to
major intersections and Council's direction; he suggested that
the optimum usage of major intersections be considered.
Council concurred.
34. a. Tuscanv Hills Specific Plan.
Addendum to the Canyon Lake Hills Final Environmental
Impact, Report, stephen's Kangaroo Rat Conservation
Agreement and 1989 Development Agreement. Resolution Nos.
89-73 & 89-74 and Ordinance Nos. 879 & 880.
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
b. Tuscany Hills Tentative Tract Map Nos. 25074, 25075, 25076,
25077, 25078, 25079, 25080 and 24383.
Planning Consultant strozier detailed the proposed Plan and its
prior considerations.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:47 p.m. asking
those in favor of these items to speak. The following people
spoke:
>
\
....
Chris Webber, Hunsaker and Associates, commented on the
hillside portions of this Plan, as well as the school and park
sites, extensive landscaping plan and other proposed amenities.
Chris Taylor, Homestead Development, stressed the extensive
requirements and increased standards imposed on this
development by Homestead, over and above the City's
requirements.
Alan Manee, representing the Grande vista Partnership (adjacent
Property Owner), felt that this is a long time development
which is worthy of City support. He requested clarification
with regard to bicycle lanes, timing for CC & R's, maintenance
of open space areas and the project's impact on the Kangaroo
Rat Habitat.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. No one
spoke. He offered the applicant an opportunity to respond to
Mr. Manee's comments.
Chris Taylor advised that there would be a bicycle lane on the
arterials, the CC & R's have already been approved and
recorded, and the open space will be maintained as directed by
the City Council. He further advised that the Department of
Fish and Wildlife has determined that they will not be --
significantly impacting the K-Rat Habitat.
Mayor Winkler closed the public hearing at 9:03 p.m.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 9:03 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:15 P.M.
Councilman Washburn commented on the size of this project and
expressed concern with voting on this project at this meeting,
because concerns with lot size, cul-de-sac length, setbacks,
etc. have not been resolved. He felt that the plans should be
updated to current standards.
City Attorney Harper commented that specific items can be
reviewed and suggested that Council provide specific items in
writing to staff for review. He also suggested the possibility
of a Study Session or a Council Sub-Committee for further
review.
Mayor Winkler agreed with the Sub-committee approach because of
the large volume of information and the short time to review
it. He also stressed concerns with minimum lot size.
Councilman Washburn advised that he would like the project to --
move forward as soon as possible and offered to serve on a
Sub-committee.
Councilman Buck concurred with the Sub-committee approach and
expressed concern with lot sizes, setbacks and parking
problems.
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
City Attorney Harper suggested that the Council reopen the
public hearing and continue it to a date certain.
Mayor Winkler commented that he would be comfortable with a
Sub-committee of Washburn and Buck and suggested that they try
to review it prior to the next Council Meeting and return with
further recommendations.
Mayor Winkler reopened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS HEARING TO JANUARY 9, 1990 AND REFER TO A
SUB-COMMITTEE OF COUNCILMEMBERS BUCK AND WASHBURN FOR FURTHER
REVIEW.
35. Cottonwood Hills Annexation Conductinq Authority Hearinq.
Resolution No. 89-75 and Aqreement with Riverside County Road
Department.
City Manager Molendyk explained that this is the next
procedural step for completion of the annexation.
Special Projects Engineer Keith explained that original
concerns with Railroad Canyon Road improvement had been
resolved as they relate to this annexation.
City Attorney Harper detailed the public hearing process and
formal Council action necessary.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:45 p.m. asking
those in favor of this annexation to speak. The following
person spoke:
Mike McGee representing Pardee Construction, explained that
this is the final administrative action required of the City
for annexation. He also explained the agreement which deals
with a condition imposed by L.A.F.C.O.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 9:46 p.m.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-75:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS COTTONWOOD HILLS
ANNEXATION 88-1 ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND
DETACHED FROM ORTEGA TRAILS RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT.
36. Briqhton Homes Development Aqreement.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JANUARY 23, 1990.
37. Community Facilities District 88-3. Resolution Nos.
89-76 k 89-77.
Bond Counsel McFarlin reminded Council that the Resolution of
Intention for this District was adopted at the November 14,
1989 meeting. He detailed the improvements to be financed
through the district. He then advised that an additional four
PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
weeks is needed to determine the densities and unit counts for
the tax rate spread, and recommended that this hearing be
opened and continued to January 23, 1990.
The City Clerk reported one written comment as follows:
Please record me as against the establishment of the
community Facilities District 88-3 of the City of Lake
Elsinore and against the necessity to incur bonded
indebtedness. I am a property owner of the above
mentioned property (A.P. #389050015-9) and wish to be
counted as against this. I am unable to attend the --
hearing.
Sincerely,
Nancy Torn
33051 Machado Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:52 p.m. asking
those in favor of Community Facilities District 88-3 to speak.
No one spoke.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. No one
spoke.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS HEARING TO JANUARY 23, 1990.
38. Railroad Canyon Road Benefit Reimbursement District.
Special Projects Engineer Keith advised that after the
adoption of Ordinance 870 on November 14, 1989, he received
three letters, which were included in the agenda packet. He
discussed alternatives to reapportion the assessments, as well
as limitations on those alternatives. --
The City Clerk reported no additional written comments or
protests.
Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 9:59 p.m. asking
those in favor of the reimbursement district to speak. No one
spoke.
Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 10:00 p.m.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO GIVE FINAL APPROVAL TO ORDINANCE 870 ALLOWING FOR
NEGOTIATION OF CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY FRIEDMAN HOMES AND HOMESTEAD
DEVELOPMENT, SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL.
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
51. Industrial proiect 89-10 = Lytle Creek Partners.
A request to construct two (2) additional single story self
storage buildings consisting of approximately 18,810 square
feet, located at the northeast corner of Collier Avenue and
Riverside Drive.
....
Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this requested and prior
work with the applicant to resolve concerns.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-40, ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW:
Findinqs
PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
1. The proposed request will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment.
2. The site for the proposed request is of adequate size
and shape to accommodate the use.
3. The proposed buildings continue the same design a~
the existing units and complies with the design
directives contained in section 17.82.060 and all
other provisions of the Municipal Code.
4. ' Conditions and safeguards pursuant to section
17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the subject project to insure
development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of.this Chapter and the Planning District
in which the site is located.
AND APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 89-10 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Planninq Division Conditions
1. Design Review Board approval will lapse and be void
unless Building Permits are issued within one (1)
year.
2. Applicant shall file a Lot Merger application with
the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of
building permits. The Lot Merger shall be recorded
prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits a Landscape
Plan must be approved by the Community Development
Director, and shall contain revisions as stated in
staff's discussion.
4. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior
to the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy and
release of utilities.
5. All site improvements shall be constructed as
indicated on the plans date stamped October 25, 1989,
and/or as modified by these Conditions of Approval or
the Planning Commission through subsequent action.
6. Meet all Riverside County Fire Department
requirements.
7. All exterior lighting sources shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets, or allow
illumination above the horizontal plane of fixture.
No wall pack units shall be permitted.
8. A final grading plan shall be submitted and approved
by the Chief Building Official.
9. Applicant shall submit a revised Final Landscape and
Irrigation Plan, which shall include 100% watering
coverage. The revised plan shall be subject to the
approval of the City's Landscape Architect. The plan
shall be approved prior to the Certificate of
Occupancy and the release of utilities and include
the following:
a) At the southeast property corner and heading
PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
west, the second and fifth trees shall be changed
to 15 gallon Platanus Acerifolia.
b) Beginning at the southwest property corner
heading north, the first and fourth trees shall
be changed to 15 gallon Platanus Acerifolia. \
\
c) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at
completion of installation of landscape
requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100%
for material and labor for one (1) year. --
10. A six-foot (6') high decorative split face wall with
one-foot (1') of wrought iron treatment at the top
shall be erected. This wall will be along the south
and east property lines and will tie to the existing
adjacent wall. A decorative slumpstone fence will
screen the west elevation.
11. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department for inclusion in the case records.
Enqineerinq Department Conditions
12. All public works requirements shall be complied with
as a condition of development as specified in the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building
permit is issued.
13. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
---
14. Construct half-street improvements to match existing
roadbed section on Riverside Drive north of Collier
Avenue. Replace existing curb and gutter on
Riverside Drive where is has been damaged and broken
by overgrowth of weeds (T.I. = 6.-0).
15. Construct all off-site public works improvements per
approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12).
Plans must be approved and signed by the city
Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
16. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a civil engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Standards, latest edition and City Codes (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
17. Pay all capital Improvement and Plan Check Fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.,34, Resolution
No. 85-26).
18. Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior
to issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Code
16.20).
-
19. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water agency, stating
that water and sewer arrangements have been made for
this project. Submit this letter prior to applying
for a building permit. .
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
20. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site
improvements shall be delineated on the street
improvement plans and approved and signed by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
21. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of off-site public works improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78).
22. All compaction reports, grade certifications,
monument certifications ( with tie-notes delineated
on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department before final inspection of
off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved.
23. Arrangements for relocation of utility company
facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
. roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
24. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside county Fire protection.
25. Provide street lighting and show lighting
improvements on street improvement plans as required
by the City Engineer.
26. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a pUblic
facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a
letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
27. All natural drainage traversing site shall be
conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and
conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
28. Applicant shall contribute $103.00 towards the City
Master Entryway Sign Program.
29. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works
improvements as established for the project by the
City Engineer.
30. Developer shall construct energy dissipators and
erosion control facilities for on-site storm run-off
outletting into drainage easement.
31. Developer shall contribute $1,300 towards the design
and construction of traffic signal at Collier Avenue
and Riverside Drive. This development will increase
traffic at intersection at least one percent (1%) and
should contribute one percent (1%) towards
construction.
BUSINESS ITEMS
52. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 871.
Relating to Zone Change 88-11.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 871:
ORDINANCE NO. 871
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 9.12 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRANKLIN
STREET, WEST OF AVENUE 6, FROM C-l (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL)
PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE
CHANGE 88-11).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
-
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
53. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 872.
Relating to Zone Change 88-12.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 872:
ORDINANCE NO. 872
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 18.11 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POTTERY
STREET, EAST OF RANCHO STREET FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING
DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 88-12).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
--
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
54. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 873.
Relating to Zone Change 89-11.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 873:
ORDINANCE NO. 873
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 57.0 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO STREET AT
THE TERMINUS OF PRINCO STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL
(R-R) TO R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE
CHANGE 89-11).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
-
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
55. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 874.
Relating to Zone Change 89-5.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 874:
PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
ORDINANCE NO. 874
-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 72.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO AT THE
TERMINUS OF LINCOLN STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL
(R-R) TO R-l (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (~ONE
CHANGE 89-5). \
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
56. Second Reading ~ Ordinance No. 875.
Relating to the Central Business Overlay District.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 875:
ORDINANCE NO. 875
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 17.11 CENTRAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DISTRICT.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN,
- WINKLER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk advised that staff is working with the
Consultant for the Police Study and a proposal should be received
by the January 9th City Council Meeting. He also advised that on
January 10 our new Police Officers will be on duty. He further
advised that following two incidents over the Christmas weekend
arrests of the responsible parties had been made involving 7
people.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Washburn commented on a high speed chase that occurred
on Christmas Eve.
Councilman Starkey wished everyone a Merry Christmas and reminded
the community of the New Year's Eve party sponsored by the
Chamber of Commerce at the Lake Community Center. He also
congratulated Pat Starkey on obtaining her first driving license
and wished everyone a Happy New Year.
Councilman Dominguez requested that at the next City Council
meeting a time line for the police study be provided.
Mayor Winkler requested that staff develop an alarm ordinance as
soon as possible. He advised that the next Public Safety
Committee meeting would be held on January 6, 1990, and advised
that Nick Nash will be representing the Brookstone area on the
Committee.
PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 26, 1989
CLOSED SESSION
None.
ADJOURNMENT
,
\
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:10 P.M.
YOR
ELSINORE
r;rEST: r .
Z~~JLLj
VICKI-kASAD, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
......
-
--