Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-1989 City Council Minutes MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1989 ****************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor WinJcler ~t 7:CC p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Buck. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Santa Claus, wished the Council and the Community a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. He also complimented the Council on their dedication to the needs of the Community. 2. Larry Knight, 110 W. Graham, requested Council consideration of his prior request to allow reinstitution of the Neighborhood Watch Patrol. He commented on a Robbery this date at pioneer Lumber to emphasize his point. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS A. Proclamation - Jared B. Ferguson, Eagle Scout. Mayor Winkler read a proclamation honoring Jared Ferguson for his accomplishments in the achievement of Eagle Scout ranking. He also presented Jared with a City Pin. CONSENT CALENDAR The fOllowing items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 3, 4 and 13. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. - 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. November 28, 1989 - Regular City Council Meeting. The following Minutes were received and filed: b. November 15, 1989 - Planning Commission Meeting. ~ November 29, 1989 - Special Planning Commission Meeting. \ PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 2. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for November, 1989. 5. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for November, 1989. 6. Ratified Warrant List for November, 1989. 7. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim cub~ittcd b~l Pennie l'...~nc rer]{ins (CL#89=-"25). .~ 8. Approved Riverside County Solid Waste Management Plan Modification and Adopted Resolution No. 89-67. RESOLUTION NO. 89-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. 9. Approved Final Parcel Map 24401. 10. Accepted Quitclaim Deed for Water Rights from Julias P. Arocha at 16900 Wells Avenue. 11. Accepted Dedications of Additional Right of Way for Single Family Residences as follow: 16900 Wells 701 Pottery 690 Pottery 611 Pottery 611 Pottery 401 Sumner 10' slope easement Corner cutback 2.50' alley dedication Corner cutback 2.50' alley dedication 2.50' alley dedication 12. Accepted Tract 17413 Access Road Dedication - Tuscany Hills. -- 14. Approved public hearing date of December 26, 1989 for the following: a. Tentative Parcel Map 24571 = Rancon Realty Fund VI. A request to subdivide 22.67 acres into 11 parcels ranging in size from .76 acres to 4.61 acres and Negative Declaration No. 89-22. The project is located on the Northwest Corner of Central and Collier Avenue. b. Development Aqreement = Brighton Homes. A proposed development agreement with Brighton Alberhill Associates in connection with a portion of the Alberhill Ranch consisting of approximately 980 acres generally bounded by Interstate 15, Lake Street, Coal Road and Nichols Road. The proposed development agreement provides for a phased, mixed use development consisting of a minimum of 1,135 dwelling units and 2,722,500 square feet of commercial and industrial buildings, together with areas for schools, open space and recreational uses. The environmental impact report prepared for the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and related matters, which was previously approved by the City, is proposed to be recertified as adequate and complete with respect to the development agreement. ..., ...,~"~'tt;,';f'~~;.,>,>'Ja,,i'.".;""-"'" ; ,,": ';-'::~'~-;_,_'-',_:-:_':~,: ~.. PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 c. Specific Plan 89-3 - Homestead Land Development (Tuscanv Hills). The Tuscany Hills Specific Plan includes a total of 2,000 dwelling units as part of a 973 acre project. Parks, private recreation areas, open space, a wildlife corridor and lake area comprise approximately -- 253 acres. An addendum to the previous Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is included as part of the r't_~__':.&:': _ T"\' -- -_ ..__" __ __ _____,~_-.&.. ....._ .....1--. -. "1"\'" .......1:"""''''''''.....&....L.''"'' .... ........4..., .........;;;, ...,'-........ Uo..;J u..a.J. O..LUC.1J,.Y.LUCJ..a.\,.. '-\..I '-.LJ.C .L.;;f(,)U Development Agreement. d. Annexation 88-1 = Cottonwood Hills - Pardee Construction Company. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Code Enforcement Activity Report - November, 1989. 4. Structure Abatement Activity Report - November, 1989. Councilman Washburn commented on the importance of these two items with regard to cleaning up the Community and mitigating crime problems. He also thanked the people who have worked with the City to resolve this type of problem. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO RECEIVE AND ORDER FILED ITEMS 3 AND 4 ABOVE. 13. Public Safety Study Update. - Councilman Dominguez advised that he had requested placement of this item on tonight's agenda. He explained the need to make strides to improve the our current pOlice services. He requested that consideration be given to update of the 1986 Study and following that an election to determine the Community opinion with regard to City Police Department vs. Sheriff's Department. Mayor Winkler commented that a recently appointed Committee is currently reviewing Public Safety issues, and stressed the need to involve the Committee in this process. He invited Tom Thomas, Chairman of the Committee to discuss the Committee's work thus far. ,-.. Mr. Thomas advised that the Committee is currently in a learning process, having thus far participated in the Ride Along Program and toured the 911 Facility, the County Jail Facility and the Sheriff's Department Facility. He further advised that they are looking at bUdgetary constraints and realistic approaches to provision of police services. He commented on the need for positive input from the residents of the Community and advised that Channel 3 will be airing 6 public input sessions on the topic, with dates to be announced. Mayor Winkler further commented on the Public Safety Committee and advised that due to recent new information he has decided to add a member from the Downtown Business Association as well as the Brookstone Development Merchants group. He further advised that Dolores Mayhall had agreed to serve on behalf of the D.B.A. and City Treasurer Tere Cherveny would be providing suggestions for the Brookstone representative. Mayor Winkler advised that in response to recent requests, the City has requested information from the Joint Powers Insurance Authority with PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 regard to a Neighborhood Watch Patrol and potential liabilities. He read the following response from J.P.I.A.: Re: Volunteer citizen Patrol This letter is in response to yours of this date, subject above. We understand that the citizen Patrol will be an independent group, not subject to control by either the city or the county. In view of this fact we b~lic~J'a it would be un;;;isa for the cit:ito. a.pprove o'r authorize their activities. To. do so could involve the city in liability claims arising from alleged negligent operation of the Patrol. Also, since auto liability follows ownership of the vehicles the city should not permit the use of vehicles or equipment by other than trained and supervised city employees. - We trust this information responds to your immediate questions. Very Truly Yours, Thomas M. Butch, General Manager He further clarified the liability factors mentioned in the letter may be a necessary risk, but he would rather study all aspects before making that type of commitment. He thanked the Committee for its work thus far and their anticipated future participation. City Manager Molendyk detailed recent upgrades in the City's Police Services contract with the Sheriff's Department. - PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. Acquisition of Property for Railroad Canyon Road. Public Services Director Kirchner explained that this is the public hearing which will initiate eminent domain proceedings for necessary properties along Railroad Canyon Road, for the pending road improvements. city Clerk Kasad reported one written comment as follows: To: City of Lake Elsinore Dear Sir, Be advised that ownership of that property presently under Right-of-Way Acquisition on Railroad Canyon Road, known as A.P. #363-019-012 (Parcels 2A & 2B), has closed escrow as of November 3, 1989, the new owners are: 1. Donald W. & Geraldine L. Frank 3708 Westridge Road Orange, California 2. Lyle K & Lois J. Schoeder 2231 E. Vermon Anaheim, California .... 3. Charles M. & Penelope L. Matter 11521 Sherwood Road San Marino, California PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Any offer or action pertaining to or regarding this property should be directed to the above parties Also, in conversations regarding the Road Right-away, said new owners are concerned about: A. Recovery of Just Compensation for said easement as of this present day and time. - B. Disposition of compensation for fill dirt required for ~~~~ ~~~4~_~ ~_~ _~____~_~~__ ~~~__~___ - - -- l::'- -.J -- - -......- '""'.....,~LLl::'~~.&.....,~ w.'-'.l'&' \,oo.l..&.~.A.. C.L.. V'&'L". C. Future ingress and egress from Railroad Canyon Road as was initially intended from the past, per Mr. Davis, a former owner, who dealt with the county regarding same. D. Future liability from falling rocks due to City's Negligence in Design Engineering of the slope to road. E. Other factors of necessity which should be subject to prior negotiations between the parties. Your redirection of effort properly noticed to the above parties would be appreciated. Thank you, Emerick M. Marzicola - City Attorney Harper advised that he spoke with Mr. Marzicola this date and explained this step in the process and future actions which would be occurring. He clarified for Council that this action is not consideration of appraised values, this step starts the process only. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. asking those in favor of this action to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this action to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m. Councilman Washburn commented on the necessity of this action for improvement and widening of Railroad Canyon Road. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-60. RESOLUTION NO. 89-60 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT; MAKING A STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR WHICH CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO BE TAKEN AND REFERENCE TO STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN; DESCRIBING THE GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY~ AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT; AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS. 32. General Plan Amendment 88-7 and Zone Chanqe 88-11 = Rancon Financial Cor?oration. A request to change the General Plan Land Use designation of PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Low Density Residential (0-6 dwellings per acre) to High Density Residential (122-24 dwellings per acre) and an associated Zone Change from C-1 (Neighborhood commercial) to R-3 (High Density Residential) on 9.12 acres, located on the south side of Franklin Street, west of Avenue 6. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. asking those in favor of General Plan Amendment 88-7 and Zone Change 88-11 to speak. The following person spoke: - Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, representing the applicant requested favorable consideration on this request. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:42 p.m. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-4 AND ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs ~ General Plan Amendment 88-7 1. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation of High Density Residential is consistent with the subject property's location adjacent to a Secondary Highway, near the 1-15 freeway and with the existing use and topography of the property. 2. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impact on the environment. 3. Granting the requested designation will permit reasonable development of the property, with adequate future reviews and controls, consistent with the characteristics of the site and adjacent properties. - 4. Goals, Policies and Objectives of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan text regarding the appropriateness and placement of multi-family dwellings will be furthered. 5. The General Plan Amendment is compatible with proposed development patterns in the surrounding vicinity. Findinqs ~ Zone Chanqe 88-11 1. The proposed R-3 Zoning is not anticipated to have any adverse significant environmental impacts. 2. The present C-1 Zoning is not consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation or the General Plan Land Use Designation requested in General Plan Amendment 88-7. 3. The proposed R-3 Zoning is consistent with General Plan Amendment 88-7. - 4. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of land uses within the City's General Plan and will bring the property's zoning into conformity with the General Plan. PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-7 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 WITH REGARD TO THIS PROJECT AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 88-11 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 871: RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 ..... A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FOURTH CYC~E OP ~~E CA~ENDAR YEAR OF 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 871 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 9.12 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRANKLIN STREET, WEST OF AVENUE 6, FROM C-l (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 88-11). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 33. General Plan Amendment 88-8 and Zone Change 88-12 = Hidden Valley Springs Ranchos. ~ A request to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Low Density Residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre) to High Density Residential (12-24 dwelling units per acre), and a Zone Change from R-l (Single-Family Residential) to R-3 (High Density Residential) for an 18.11 acre parcel located on the north side of Pottery Street, east of Rancho Street. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m., asking those in favor of General Plan Amendment 88-8 and Zone Change 88-12 to speak. The following person spoke: Fred Crowe, Butterfield Engineering, representing the applicant requested favorable consideration on this request. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:45 p.m. ..... Councilman Buck questioned the timing of this project and commented on the favorable impacts which the improvement of Franklin Street would bring. Fred Crowe, was uncertain as to the exact timing, however he anticipated construction in approximately 2 years. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-39 AND ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Findings- General Plan Amendment 88-8 1. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation of High Density Residential is consistent with the subject property's location adjacent to a Secondary Highway, near the I-15 freeway and with the existing use and topography of the property. 2. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impact on the environment. 3. Granting the requested designation will permit reasonable development of the property, with adequate future reviews and controls, consistent with the characteristics of the site and adjacent properties. - 4. Goals, Policies and Objectives of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan text regarding the appropriateness and placement of mUlti-family dwellings will be furthered. 5. The General Plan Amendment is compatible with proposed development patterns in the surrounding vicinity. Findinqs = Zone Chanqe 88-12 1. The proposed R-3 Zoning is not anticipated to have any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The present R-1 Zoning is not consistent with the requested General Plan Land Use designation of "High Density Residential" contained in General Plan Amendment 88-8. 3. The proposed R-3 Zoning is consistent with General Plan Amendment 88-8. - 4. The proposed Zoning will facilitate compatibility of land uses within the City's General Plan and will bring the property's zoning into conformity with the General Plan. APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-8 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 AS IT RELATES TO THIS ITEM AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 88-12 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 872: RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FOURTH CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 872 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 18.11 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POTTERY STREET, EAST OF RANCHO STREET FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 88-12). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: - AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE - 37. West Lake Elsinore Assessment District Environmental Impact RePOrt 88-2 = RMG Enqineering/The Keith Companies. Draft Environmental Impact Report to consider the formation of the Wc~t La1to Elsinore As~aS3mant Dist~i~t, ~ ~p~~i~l ~i~t~i=~ to provide utilities and related infrastructure improvements to the study area, as well as related follow-up on residential development which will be facilitated by the utility and infrastructure improvements; the project encompasses approximately 1,127 acres of land generally bounded by Lakeshore Drive and Mountain Avenue on the north, Machado Street on the east, Alvarado Street and its extension on the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains to the West. This public hearing was taken out of order, because it impacts items 34, 35 and 36. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed the plan for improvements to be completed and advised that while the impacts are significant the improvements will help to defray that impact. The City Clerk reported one written comment which read as follows: Dear Mayor Winkler and City Council: - In reviewing the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the West Elsinore Assessment District (EIR 88-2) I came upon several items of concern. I would first like to bring to your attention mitigation measures for the fire protection in the area. On page 1-25 Item #6 the report indicates that the fire station should be fully operational before the issuance of the loooth Certificate of Occupancy. I would request that the Council address this further. Past discussions have indicated the immediate need for a fire station in the West Lake Elsinore area. I think it would be appropriate to condition all tentative maps in this area with specific phasing requirements for the fire protection. See attached excerpt from EIR 88-2. - Flood control mitigation measures have been one of the major concerns and issues in regards to development in this area. On page 3-64 storm drain lines are discussed and it indicated that "underground portions of line Band C are sized to carry the runoff generated by a 10 year storm and that during a 100 year storm event, the additional flow would be carried in the street section above the facility." This must be an error, all underground facilities must be sized to 100 year storm requirements to meet Riverside County Flood Control standards. The material covered in this report is extensive and takes many hours to review. I strongly urge council and staff to make themselves very familiar with the information provided so that if there is a need for further detail or addition mitigation those items will be included in Conditions of Approval for all tentative tract maps in this area. PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Mrs. Michael priske 15015 Le Gaye Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. asking those in favor of this Environmental Impact Report to speak. lo.T~ ___ ___,~_ .....v '-''''4~ ..,.t''''''~~. ___ Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:57. Councilman Washburn commented on the need for this assessment district to ensure necessary infrastructure improvements. He questioned item #10 on Page 10 relating to and the designation of not significant. Planning Manager Thornhill advised that under C.E.Q.A. regulations it is not significant. Councilman Washburn inquired whether the comments returned had been incorporated in this document. The.Consultant advised that they were included by reference only at this point, but would incorporated in the final document. He further inquired about the mitigation monitoring plan and if this was a new requirement. Staff confirmed that it is a new requirement. Councilman Washburn questioned if the park facilities time frame of five years was realistic. Staff confirmed if the mining operations are concluded in 3-1/2 years as anticipated the five year time frame is accurate. Councilman Washburn questioned the timing/phasing of the fire station and if it could be sooner than proposed. John Mandrell, representing RMG Engineering, advised that once the bonds are sold the funding would be available, however the 1000 home recommendation came from the County Fire Department. Planning Manager Thornhill clarified that this is only the E.I.R. and the fire station issue could be resolved at the hearing for the Assessment District. - City Attorney Harper further clarified that the Flood Control Improvements would be required to meet standards of the Riverside County Flood Control District. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CERTIFY THE E.I.R. WITH THE FIRE STATION TIMING TO BE CHANGED FROM THE 1000TH TO THE 500TH CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 34. General Plan Amendment 89-10 and Zone Change 88-11 - Marinita Development. A request to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Specific Plan and Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre); to pre-zone the property to R-l (Single Family Residential); and approval of Tentative Tract Map 24213 for a single-family subdivision of 160 lots on 56.9 acres of land generally located northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus of princo Street. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised that negotiations were ensuing to maintain the 25 foot easement for recreational trail discussed earlier. - The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. asking ~ ..... ~ PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 those in favor of this project to speak. The following person spoke: Scott Fawcett, representing Marinita Development, commented on concerns previously expressed by the surrounding homeowners which have been mitigated. He further commented on the dedication of easements for the recreational trail and offered to answer any questions from Council. Larry Truman, representing Butterfield Engineering, advised that the owner of Let ~ h~~ ~~~uty ~pp~vVQl Zv~ upe~uti0i1 0r a Produce Stand. He requested that the conditions be changed to allow the owner access to Grand Avenue until the time building permits for a home are issued. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that the access request had been discussed and it was felt that too many traffic circulation and safety problems existed. Councilman Washburn inquired where the recreation trail would be on the map. Planning Manager Thornhill advised that it had not been included in the plan because it would most likely end up on the adjacent property. Mr. Jim Withrow, owner of Lot 6 further requested Council consideration of the Grand Avenue access request and detailed his proposed operation and the constraints placed on him by the County. Councilman Dominguez requested that staff work with Mr. withrow to allow his operation until development occurs. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that this matter could be addressed in a Conditional Use Permit process MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AMEND CONDITION #38 AS DISCUSSED. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 88-2, ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs = General Plan Amendment 89-10 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allow density more in keeping with the SUbject property's location, access and site characteristics. 2. A significant amount of land use, circulation and infrastructure planning has already been accomplished on the subject property which eliminates the need to prepare a Specific Plan. 3. Planned drainage improvements, to be funded and implemented as part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, will remove the threat of flood hazard. 4. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is compatible with surrounding uses and development patterns. ~~ PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Findinqs = Zone Chanqe 89-5 1. The present County of Riverside Zoning of "Rural Residential" is not consistent with the requested General Plan Land Use Designation of "Low Density Residential" as contained in General Plan Amendment 89-10. 2. The proposed zoning, which will become effective upon annexation , is consistent with General Plan Amendment 89-5. I ~ 3. The proposed Zoning will facilitate compatibility of land uses within the City's General Plan and will bring the property into conformity with the General Plan. - Findinqs = Tentative Tract Map 24213 1. The Tentative Tract complies with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan and the R-1 Zoning standards. 2. The project, as conditioned, complies with the City's Subdivision standards and the State Subdivision Map Act. 3. The project, as conditioned, will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the immediate area and will have minimal adverse impacts on abutting properties. APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-10 AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 AS IT PERTAINS TO THIS ITEM AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-11, ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 873 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24213 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Conditions = Tentative Tract Map 24213 - 1. Tentative Tract Map 24213 is approved subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment 89-10 and Pre-Zone Change 89-11 and Annexation to the City. 2. Tentative Tract Map 24213 shall expire two (2) years after City Council approval date, unless extended as provided by the State of California Subdivision Map Act. 3. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance. 4. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC & R's shall also include screening of any ground base disk and no roof-mounted or front yard disk shall be allowed. CC & R's shall be sUbject to the approval of the Community Development Director, or designee, prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. cc & R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed in the future. - 5. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans, landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor Design Review approval prior to issuance of building permits. All standards of development and procedural steps in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal shall apply for this project. ",',,'1 ".,.#>"~l"",,,,,, k' J.2I . PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 6. A combination of walls and/or fences shall be constructed around the perimeter of the subdivision and adjacent to the McVickers Canyon Flood Control Channel. Precise design materials and location to be determined through Minor Design Review process. ".-- 7. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. G. ~~iv~ tv iss~auc6 of aliY gzadiug p6~illit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 9. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of landscape and irrigation plans for model homes (if such as desired), back-up wall areas, street trees and slope planting in accord with the City Landscape Guidelines, prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Signage for this subdivision shall require city Permits. 11. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to installation. 12. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Planning Department. - 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, subdivider shall provide assurance that all required fees have been paid to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District. 14. Comply with all conditions of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 15. Prior to approval of a Final Tract Map by the City Council, all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the minimum dimensional standards of the R-l Zoning District. 16. Subdivider shall provide a 25-foot wide multi-purpose recreational trail along the rear of Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 46 and 47 with final location, design and improvement subject to the approval of the City Public Works Director and the Community Development Director. Said Easement to be dedicated to the City. 17. If Lot 6 is re-configured to take vehicular access from De La Lama Street, a variance may be needed to allow a lot to be created with substandard frontage. DELETED. - 18. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting District is required prior to approval of a Final Tract Map. 19. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Department. 20. Comply with applicable environmental mitigation measures contained in Environmental Impact Report 88-2: PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 a) Architectural standards shall be implemented to utilize building materials and site designs that minimize noise intrusion and that provide exterior noise-sheltered environments. b) The proposed project shall be consistent with all applicable criteria outlined in the General Plan, and Grading Standards identified in Ordinance 772. I . , c) Grading Plans shall preserve signifi::a:nt h' vegetation stands. d) Use native plant material for re-Iandscaping. ... e) Prior to issuance of grading permits, soil sampling and testing shall be conducted on any agricultural portions of the site to test for residues of pesticides, herbicides and/or fungicides. f) Should a City-wide or area-wide fee program be adopted by the City for increase in police services, this project should be required to participate along with other developments. Enqineerinq Department Conditions 21. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. 22. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the Engineering Department. - 23. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution No. 85-26). 24. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering' Department, from the applicable water district, stating water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for building permits. 25. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map. 26. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a civil Engineer. Improvements shall be to Riverside County Road Department Standards latest edition, and City Codes (L.E.M.C. 12.04 and 16.34). 27. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site pUblic works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). -- 28. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie-notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering Department before final inspection of PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 29. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County fire protection. .... 30. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements on street improvement plans, as required by the City Engineer. ~, D~?i~~~e ~h~ll b~ ~~~veyed t~ a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 32. Hydrology and hydraulic study shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval by the City Engineer and Riverside County Flood Control District prior to final map approval. 33. Applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City for construction of public works improvements and post appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 34. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. ..... 35. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for infrastructure improvements and operation and maintenance for the West Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement District., No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued on lots sold until the West Lake Elsinore District has been formed 36. Contribute $300.00 tuwards the City's Master Entryway Sign Program. 37. Developer shall be subject to all conditions of Riverside County Flood Control District for development of this site. 38. Lot 6 may have access to Grand Avenue upon prior review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit for non-residential uses of the lot. 39. No lots shall have access to Lincoln Street 40. Lincoln Street shall be improved to provide 2 lanes of travel to existing improvements to the east prior to first Certificate of Occupancy. 41. Audelo Street shall be improved to provide one parking lane and 2 travel lanes (30-foot). ~ 42. Increase in downstream drainage in De La Lama, Audelo and princo Streets shall be mitigated. 43. All drainage swales across adjacent properties shall be in easements approved by the City Engineer. 44. Drainage swales and slopes off-site must be secured from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 45. Storm drain easements for 36 inch storm drain pipe will require City Engineer approval. PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 46. All major drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District standards and agreement entered into with the District for construction, ownership and maintenance. 47. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with preliminary and finish grade certification. 48. All storm facilities shall provide tract and downstream property owners with 100 year storm flood protection and be approved by Riverside County Flood District. .... RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FOURTH CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 873 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 57.0 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO STREET AT THE TERMINUS OF PRINCO STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R-R) TO R-l (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. (ZONE CHANGE 89-11) UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER .... NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 35. General Plan Amendment 89-5: Zone Chanqe 89-5 = Orteqa Partners. A request to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Specific Plan and Floodplain/floodway to Low Density Residential (0-6 Dwellings/Acre and a pre-zone to R-l (Single- Family Residential) for 72.5 acres of land generally located northwesterly of Machado Street at the terminus of Lincoln Street. Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised that the location is adjacent to the Marinita development. He further advised that the Map is not being considered tonight due to Planning Commission concerns with regard to buffer areas. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m., asking those in favor of General Plan Amendment 89-5 and Zone Change 89-5 to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:40 p.m. ... PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CERTIFY E.I.R. 88-2 AND ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs = General Plan Amendment 89-5 - 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allowed density move in keeping with the subject property's location, access and site characteristics. 3. A ~ignificant amount of l~nd use, circulation and infrastructure planning has already been accomplished on the subject property which eliminates the need to prepare a Specific Plan. 3. Planned drainage improvements, to be funded and implemented as part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, will remove the threat of flood hazard. 4. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is compatible with surrounding uses and development patterns. Findings = Zone Change 89-5 1. The present County of Riverside zoning of "Rural Residential" is not consistent with the requested General Plan Land Use Designation of "Low Density Residential" as contained in General Plan Amendment 89-5. - 2. The proposed R-l zoning, which will become effective upon annexation, is consistent with General Plan Amendment 89-5. 3. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of land uses within the City's General Plan and will bring the property into conformity with the General Plan. APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-5 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 WITH REGARD TO THIS ITEM AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-5 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 874: RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FOURTH CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 874 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REZONING 72.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY OF MACHADO AT THE TERMINUS OF LINCOLN STREET, FROM COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL (R-R) TO R-l (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, (ZONE CHANGE 89-5). UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 36. General Plan Amendment 89-11 = Centex Homes. A request to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Specific Plan and Floodway/Floodplain to Low Density Residential (0-6 dwelling per acre), for 206.4 acres of land generally located south of Mountain Avenue, west of Michigan Street. - Planning Manager Thornhill detailed this request and advised that the companion map to this project was still being reviewed and would be coming to Council soon. The City Clerk reported no comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m., asking those in favor of General Plan Amendment 89-11 to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:44 p.m. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CERTIFY E.I.R. 88-2 AND ADOPT FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs = General Plan Amendment 89-11 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allowed density move in keeping with the subject property's location, access and site characteristics. 2. A significant amount of land use, circulation and infrastructure planning has already been accomplished on the subject property which eliminates the need to prepare a Specific Plan. .... 3. Planned drainage improvements, to be funded and implemented as part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, will remove the threat of flood_ hazard. 4. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is compatible with surrounding uses and development patterns. APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-11 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 AS IT RELATES TO THIS ITEM. RESOLUTION NO. 89-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FOURTH CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1989. 38. Ordinance No. 875 = Estab1ishinq Chapter 17.11 - Central Business Overlay District. - city Manager Molendyk explained this Ordinance. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Winkler opened the public hearing at 8:47 p.m., asking those in favor of the ordinance to speak. No one spoke. PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 Mayor Winkler asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 8:47 p.m. Councilman Buck requested the inclusion of a map with this ordinance. He also requested that the Downtown Design Review Committee be the only consideration with no further Planning staff or Planning Commission review. ,...-- Councilman Washburn requested deletion of the second section of 17.11.060. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO DELETE THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION. City Manager Molendyk reemphasized the members of the Committee as stated in Section 17.11.050, and clarified the voting members. City Attorney Harper suggested the following in regard to Councilman Buck's comments: Upon approval by the Design Review Committee, no further design approval by Planning staff or Planning Commission shall be required. Mayor Winkler advised that he is in support of the proposed Ordinance and thanked Councilman Dominguez for his work in the downtown area and further advised that he would be supporting Mr. Dominguez for appointment to the Committee. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 875: ORDINANCE NO. 875 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 17.11 CENTRAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DISTRICT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE BUSINESS ITEMS 51. An Extension of Time for Commercial Project 88-11 = Ervin Palmer. - A request for a one-year design review extension for three accessory structures at the Elsinore West Marina. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed prior Council considerations of this project and explained that Mr. Palmer has been working to obtain financing for the project and purchasing the Roadrunner Park next door and is nearly ready to begin work. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO GRANT A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME, WITH THE PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. j'J,h~... PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 52. Commercial pro4ect 88-13 = Champion Development. A request for a time extension to take out building permits on 11,973 square foot commercial office building previously approved by City Council/ Redevelopment Agency on November 22, 1988. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed prior consideration of this project and advised that the plans are currently in Plan Check for review. He recommended approval of the exte~sion of time subject to the original conditions as well as modified conditions 41 and 42. ... MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW: Findinqs 1. Subject to the modified conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The project, as approved, complies with the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and the General Commercial Zoning District. 3. The project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning District in which it is located. ..- AND APPROVE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT 88-13, WITH CONDITIONS 41 AND 42 MODIFIED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 41. Dedicate fourteen (14) feet along property frontage on Grape Street to provide for an eighty-eight (88) foot right-of-way (44 feet half street) prior to issuance of building permit or fulfill condition number 42. 42. Have property owner on east side of Grape Street dedicate sufficient right-of-way along property frontage on Grape Street with sufficient dedication from applicant to provide for an eighty-eight (88) foot right-of-way on Grape Street. Property owner on east side of Grape Street must submit Grant Deed dedication and have Grant Deed approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit for this project C 88-13. If necessary, street abandonment on Grape street shall be processed and recorded prior to building permit. 53. Response to Complaints at 223 Chaney Street. ... Community Development Director Gunderman advised that in response the the last Council meeting, the Planning and Engineering staffs have met with Mr. Ryal and reached agreement for the construction of a block wall as requested. He further advised that staff is currently working to establish the correct property line for placement of the wall. PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 - Mr. Ryal commented that he has not yet been notified as to where the property line is. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that it appears that the property line is a the back side of the sidewalk, however he would need to verify that location the next day. City Manager Molendyk advised that this is an update and work will continue and Mr. Ryal will be notified in writing. MOVED BY !A~!'..SHE~~r, S~~~~~~~~ EY .:)O~.~I~~GVEZ "" 'It.TT'''Il. ,..."" T"\T"\Tor"", n-.:r T1"\,T..-. '\.T'T'................,.. &'1.j,'4J.J '-"~,,'\..L,~J.;,,1.I UL V.l1n.&.'t..LJ:J.VUu VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THIS REPORT. 54. Mr. Solis' Complaint. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that this item had been referred to this meeting for a report from staff. He explained that the fees paid by Mr. Solis were in accordance with ordinances in effect at the time of construction. He further explained that there was a period of time when those fees were inadvertantly not collected, there is not a provision in the ordinance to allow for that collection after the fact. He advised that a letter confirming this information will be sent to Mr. Solis. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THIS REPORT. - 55. Ordinance No. 876 - Urgency Ordinance for the expansion of the East Floodplain Planning Area to include the following areas: 1) Certain properties located between Lakepoint Park and the San Jacinto River and between Lakeshore Drive and the moratorium area as described in Ordinance No. 838, and 2) Certain properties located southerly of Cereal Street and bounded by Corydon Road on the southeast and the City Limits on the Southwest, and the moratorium area on the west. Mayor Winkler inquired, since the affected area does not involve his property, is it advisable to vote on this Ordinance. City Attorney Harper recommended that he not participate in this matter. City Manager Molendyk explained the areas that had inadvertantly been deleted from the ordinance. He reminded Council that this item would come back for a public hearing on the regular ordinance. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED BELOW; ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 876 AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SCHEDULE THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 9, 1990. Findinqs 1. The City, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency is contemplating the development of a land use and circulation plan for the East Floodplain and City Lake Perimeter. - 2. Additional development approvals within the Planning Area may conflict with the proposed elements of the contemplated plan. 3. Current and pending development proposals constitute an immediate threat for adverse impact elements of the contemplated plan, especially the provision of safe and adequate access to public and private lands, thereby constituting a current and immediate threat to the pUblic health, safety, and welfare. PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 ORDINANCE NO. 876 AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN AREA AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER AREA TO INCLUDE IN THE MORATORIUM CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE AREA NORTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED INLET CHANNEL DEFINED AS BEING BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY LAKEPOINT PARK, ON THE NORTH BY LAKESHORE DRIVE, ON THE EAST BY SAN JACINTO RIVER, AND THEN SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY O? THE INLET CHANNEL NEAR THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, 2) THE AREA LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF CEREAL STREET AND BOUNDED BY CORYDON ROAD ON THE SOUTHEAST AND THE CITY LIMITS ON THE SOUTHWEST AND 3) THE LAKE PERIMETER AREA BEGINNING AT THE CITY BOUNDARY AT BONNIE LEA DRIVE AND THE LAKE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY TO GRAND AVENUE, AND THEN INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE LAKE SIDE BOUNDARIES OF GRAND AVENUE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, AND TERMINATING AT LAKEPOINT PARK. ... UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Molendyk requested a joint executive session regarding potential litigation and property acquisition following the Redevelopment Agency meeting. ... CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Starkey commented on the City Christmas Tree at the intersection of Main/Graham and his hope that it will be an annual event. He further commented on the work being done at the T & S Development center to lower the manhole covers. He reminded the public of the Chamber of Commerce New Year's Eve Party with the theme Glitz, Glitter and Glamor at the Community Center. Councilman Buck thanked all of the volunteers for their work on the Christmas Parade. Councilman Washburn thanked the students at Machado School for their letters requesting a bike trail around the Lake; and requested that staff write a response from the Mayor. Mayor Winkler advised that S.A.W.P.A. had made the decision to condemn 157 acres of the property owned by Crater Acres; and when he receives formal notification, copies will be available for review in the City Clerk's Office. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 9:15 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:24 P.M. ... CLOSED SESSION THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 9:25 P.M. TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION. THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:55 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN. PAGE TWENTY-THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1989 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:56 P.M. oJ1)Ja - JIM WINKLER, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE .~ '. ~~ -. ~\TE~T: . ~~~-KA~ CITY OF ~~INORE CLERK - -