Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-27-1990 City Council Minutes MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1990 ****************************************************************** - CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Washburn at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by councilman Dominguez. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: STARKEY Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, city Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS A. Proclamation = Soccer Month. - Mayor Washburn read the proclamation for Soccer Month, December, 1990 and Freeway Cup Day on December 11, 1990, and presented it to Nancy Freeman, Vice-President of the Soccer Club. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Washburn commented on the city's working relationship with the City of Temecula and the future potential for working with Murrieta and Canyon Lake. He introduced Jerry Allen, Mayor; Dave Haas and Gary Smith from the new City of Murrieta. Mayor Jerry Allen presented the city Council with cookies and telephone books. Mayor Washburn also commented that work is continuing with GTE for a compromise cover for the phone books in this area. He detailed the proposed cover and the inclusion of all local cities in one type size. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. City Council Meeting - November 13, 1990. 2. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for October, 1990 3. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for October, 1990. 4. Ratified Warrant List for November 15, 1990. PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 Resolution Nos. 90-114 ~ 90-115. ~ community Development Director Gunderman stated that at the last meeting there were a number of requested items to be added to the General Plan Text which included acquisition of the Lake, preservation of historical buildings within the City, industrial areas and inclusion of the Geothermal capabilities of the Community. Mr. Gunderman further explained that he had received a request from a property owner from the proposed annexation area to re-examine the property and it is recommended that it be designated medium/high density. Mr. Gunderman recommended approval of the General Plan and the supporting environmental documentation. Mayor Washburn thanked Mr. Gunderman and reminded Council that this is a continuation of the Public Hearing. He then asked if Council had any questions. Councilman Buck commented that he felt all of his concerns were addressed and that the General Plan was now complete. Councilman Winkler stated that he felt that the School issues were answered and invited Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Maw to speak. Dr. Maw stated that the School District wished to express their appreciation regarding the cooperation that they have received from the City regarding the future development of new school facilities. Councilman Dominguez stated that the Geothermal sources were addressed and he is satisfied with the General Plan. Mayor Washburn questioned page 25, policy 3.2.1 and stated that he would like to see it changed to clarify the language for future staff members. Mayor Washburn asked that this policy read that the City shall acquire heritage buildings and preserve such historic sites for public facility uses. Councilman Buck questioned the intent of the City in regard to this policy. city Attorney Harper stated that 'shall consider' instead of 'shall acquire' should be used in the General Plan. He further stated that it would ultimately be up to the City Council whether to purchase a building or not. Mayor Washburn questioned that in the future at some point it would be wise to develop a master plan of heritage buildings the city should eventually acquire. Mayor Washburn discussed Objective 1.1 regarding the housing goal. He then questioned the plans for the Skylark Airport. Mr. Gunderman stated that the Federal Aviation Administration as well as the Airport Land Use Commission has the responsibility of preparing standards for land uses around airports. He further stated that they set the parameter in which the area around an airport can be developed. The City is not bound by the Master Plan but we are a part of the process. Mayor Washburn discussed F100dway and Floodplain and questioned the uses that are called out in the General Plan. He further questioned the Zoning being in conformance with the General Plan. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 5. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim submitted by Main Street Video. 6. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim submitted by Elsinore cycle Gear. 7. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim submitted by Auto Parts Depot, Inc. 8. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim submitted by Southern California Edison Company. 9. Adopted Resolution No. 90-116 relating to Marks-Roos Bonds, __ Series B. RESOLUTION NO. 90-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING BENEFIT TO THE RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. II OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. 10. Adopted Resolution of Intention No. 90-117 to Vacate a Portion of Silver Street adjacent to Southerly Right-of-Way of Pottery Street. Abandonment 90-3. RESOLUTION NO. 90-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A STREET EASEMENT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. 11. Approved Change Order No. 2 for the Northwest Sewer Project Assessment District 86-1. 12. Approved public hearing date of December 11, 1990 for the following: a. Tentative Parcel Map 25106 (Revised) = Tomislav Gabric and Associates. -- A request to divide a 7.7 acre site into two parcels. Parcell of 2.71 acres and Parcel 2 of 3.37 acres to accommodate a retail/commercial development consisting of five (5) buildings and associated parking. The revision of this proposed development increases the gross acreage of the site from 6.6 acres to 7.7 acres. The increase of one (1) acre would incorporate additional area for an increase in the number of parking spaces available for the proposed development. b. Zone Chanqe 90-8 Revised = Thomas Brothers Development. A request to re-zone a 0.69 acre parcel from R-l (Single Family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial). The project is located approximately 250 feet southeast of the intersection of Summerhill and Railroad Canyon Roads. c. Tentative Tract Map 25830 = Homestead Land Development. A request to subdivide 36.79 acres of land. The project lays south of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald Avenue, for the construction of 140 single-family lots -- with one (1) lot as a sewer lift station. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. General Plan Revision and Related Environmental Impact Report. PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 City Attorney Harper advised that the city has a statutory obligation to bring the Zoning in conformance with the General Plan. He further stated that there is no case law that sets a time that this must be done, but the burden is on the City and not on the developer. Mr. Gunderman further advised that staff will be working with Planning Commission to bring the zoning map in compliance with the new General Plan. There was considerable discussion regarding fees for future zone changes to comply with the General Plan. City Attorney Harper clarified the procedure for zoning fees. -- Mayor Washburn commended the efforts of the General Plan Committee, B.S.I. and staff for their work on the General Plan. He asked if anyone from the audience wished to speak. The following persons spoke: Mr. Gary Pebley, 30905 Corte De Los Santos, Temecula, stated that he has appeared before in regard to the property on Machado and Lakeshore and questioned the designation for this area. Mr. Gunderman stated that for that entire area the City will follow the County designation for the most part. He further stated that the change is in the entitlement but not in the use. Mr. Fred Crowe, 18740 Collier Avenue, Lake Elsinore, addressed the General Plan relative to schools and stated that he felt it should not be included in the General Plan document. He further stated that he objects to the School District having control over the Council's decisions or future Council's decisions. He further stated that the policies proposed can lead to a bureaucratic mix that will lead the new home buyers paying at least four times their fair share for schools. He -- further objected to the word shall and requested that it be replaced with the word may to give control back to City Council. Councilman Winkler addressed the problems that the School Board faces in development of schools. He stated that the General Plan gives the City the ability to assist in addressing the problems of school development. The City Attorney stated that the "shall" is "shall consider" and not "shall do" in the context of the General Plan. Mr. Kevin Jefferies, 17682 Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore, questioned the designation for the Maxon Tract. Mr. Gunderman stated that the work is underway to define the use of the Specific Plan for that area. He further stated that when a Specific Plan is approved, it becomes a zoning ordinance. Mr. Steve Craven, Lake Elsinore, questioned the floodway area and its size. Ms. Karen Gully, P.B.R., stated that the Floodway is based on the current information available from the Riverside County Flood Control District. She further stated that the Flood Control District and FEMA are in process of a study to redefine the floodway for the Temescal Valley. The precise boundaries are unknown and what is shown is from the most current information. ... PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 Mayor Washburn asked if the verbiage of how this area is designated should be different. city Attorney Harper stated that the City does not have the legal ability to inform someone they can build when FEMA says that they cannot. This issue should be considered when addressing the General Plan Map. __ MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE TEXT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE GENERAL PLAN MAP TO BE REVIEWED, REVISED AND CONTINUED TO THE DECEMBER 11, 1990, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. RESOLUTION NO. 90-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE REVISED GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. RESOLUTION NO. 90-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH 88-2-114) FOR THE GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN. 32. Collier Avenue Improvement proiect Environmental Impact Report. Resolution No. 90-118. community Development Director Gunderman detailed the pending work on Collier Avenue. The city Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. asking those in favor of this action to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO CERTIFY THE COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR NO. 90-3) AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-118. IT FURTHER CARRIED TO ALLOW THE SUBSEQUENT ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE NEW GENERAL PLAN. RESOLUTION NO. 90-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. 33. Tentative Parcel Map 25586 = Ayres Properties (The Keith Companies/Butterfield) . A request to subdivide 1.25 acres into four (4) residential lots. The project is located at the northern termini of Avenue 9 and 10. community Development Director Gunderman detailed the proposed project. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. asking those in favor of this project to speak. The following person spoke: Larry Truman, Butterfield Engineering, concurred with staff report and offered to answer any questions. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:56 p.m. Mayor Washburn questioned the deletion of Condition #10 relating to bicycle lanes. community Development Director Gunderman explained that this property does not have any frontage on Casino where bicycle lanes would apply. .... MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO RE-AFFIRM NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-19 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25586 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Findinqs: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision or land use is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. (Government Code section 66473.5) 2. The Planning commission has considered the effects of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. (Government Code section 66412.3) ... 3. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. (Government Code section 66473.1) 4. The Planning commission shall determine whether the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system would result in a violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Water Code. If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed waste discharge would result in or add to a violation of said requirements, the Planning Commission may disapprove the tentative map or maps of the subdivision. (Government Code Section 66474.6) 5. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore Subdivision Ordinance. Planninq Division Conditions: 1. Tentative Parcel Map will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. ... PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 3 . - 4. 5. 6. 7. 2. The Tentative Parcel Map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance. Signage for this subdivision shall require City Permits. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site preparation activity. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Planning Division. All grading shall conform to the requirements of section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. 8. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and grading for subject development as required by the City Engineer and Chief Building Official. a) Bonding shall be done by phases and not by final map(s) on grading. b) Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other improvements. 9. Pay all applicable fees in force at time of issuance of building permits. 10. Delete. 11. Prior to final approval of Parcel Map 25586 the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning commission and the City Council shall be installed, or the bonds and agreement for said improvements, shall be submitted to the city, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. 12. Prior to final approval by the City Council, all lots within this sUbdivision shall conform to the minimum dimensional standards of the R-l Zoning District. 13. Final Map shall reflect plotting as approved on plans date stamped October 24, 1990 14. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City Building Division. 15. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Department. 17. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 18. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 19. The developer shall submit plans to Southern California Edison for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the city and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 20. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison - Company. 21. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas Company. 22. Meet all requirements of General Telephone Company. 23. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 24. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of this project shall be subject to approval of the Community Development Director. 25. Annexation to the city's Landscaping and Lighting District is required prior to approval of a Final Parcel Map. 26. Delete. 27. Any alternations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require the appropriate City permits. A Geologic Soils _ Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading ordinance, subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official and Planning Division. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 28. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 29. All residences shall be served by a sidewalk along lot frontage. 30. All sidewalks shall be separated from curb with parkway which shall be subject to the approval of Community Development Director. 31. conceptual and Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans for all project slope areas and fire breaks shall be -- approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of development. Improvements shall be installed prior to certificate of Occupancy. PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 ~ 32. All conditions of approval for Residential Project 89-8 shall be incorporated by reference herein, and are included as attachments to this report. 33. All applicable conditions of Residential project 89-9 shall apply to Tentative Parcel Map 25586. Conditions pertaining to plan approval, easements, off-site right-of-way and clearance letters from other affected agencies shall be completed and approved prior to final map approval. 34. A Lot Merger for Lots 122 and 123 shall be completed. BUSINESS ITEMS 51. Community Facilities District 88-3 (West Lake Elsinore). Resolution Nos. 90-119 and 90-120 and Ordinance No. 907. city Attorney Harper detailed the proposed action and the vote in support of formation of this District. Councilman Buck questioned the timing to proceed with the work and who the lead agency is to facilitate it. Administrative services Director Wood advised that he met with the representatives and the construction manager today and they have provided a time frame for the first two years of the project. He further advised that the first funding will occur in February of 1991 and the infrastructure bid will be due in March, 1991. ----- Councilman Buck questioned the timing for the extension of Grand Grand Avenue and commented on the excessive traffic on Machado Street at this time. Administrative Services Director Wood was not sure of this timing for this portion, but approximately $10 million worth of work is anticipated for the first phase. City Manager Molendyk clarified that this is a city District and there will be certain level of input on the timing and funding. Administrative Services Director Wood further clarified City Council's responsibility and duties under this District. city Attorney Harper suggested that staff provide copies of the timing schedule to council for review. Mr. Wood will be providing copies. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 90-119 AND 90-120 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 907. RESOLUTION NO. 90-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A VALIDATION ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY OF THE ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (WEST LAKE ELSINORE), AND ALL PROCEEDINGS LEADING UP TO THE ADOPTION OF SUCH ORDINANCE. ----- RESOLUTION NO. 90-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DETERMINING THE RESULT OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 (WEST LAKE ELSINORE) ON NOVEMBER 14, 1990. PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 ORDINANCE NO. 907 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: STARKEY .... ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 52. Extension of Time = Tentative Parcel Map 23381 = K-Mart. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the pending concerns of this site and also the concerns which have already been addressed. He advised that grading began on the 26th, but staff is not sure of the anticipated completion date. He further advised that while staff is not recommending the extension of time, they cannot recommend the work underway be terminated. City Manager Molendyk advised that the approximate cost to finish the work would be $16,000 and about 30 to 45 days for completion. Mayor Washburn confirmed that work was being done on the site. Councilman Buck advised that he had seen five or ten trucks on the site this date and work had begun. He commented on the cost of the equipment and his belief that the work would be completed. .... Mayor Washburn asked Fred Crowe from Butterfield Engineering for an update. Mr. Crowe advised that he spoke with Mr. O'Byrne and the dirt has been sold twice already before projects were terminated. Mayor Washburn questioned the time frame for completion. Mr. Crowe believed work would probably be completed in two weeks. City Manager Molendyk suggested that Staff be authorized to proceed if work has not been completed in 10 days. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS AND IF WORK HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED STAFF IS TO PROCEED ADMINISTRATIVELY. 53. Alberhill Pump station Modification. Public Services Director Kirchner detailed the modifications and the purpose. He further detailed the bid results and recommended award of contract to vista Murrieta Corp. in the amount of $25,600.00. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH VISTA MURRIETA CORP. AS STATED. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ..- city Manager Molendyk requested a joint executive session with the Redevelopment Agency to discuss potential litigation. PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1990 city Manager Mo1endyk commented on recent work with the School District and an agreement to assist them with school bus storage at the city Yard. He further commented that the additional allocated police officers will be scheduled on the next Board of supervisors agenda for approval; and the additional fire fighters for the third man on each truck are now on board. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS r--- Councilman Dominguez requested an update on the freeway off-ramp traffic signal for Railroad Canyon Road. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that the plan is currently being reviewed, however, Caltrans funding is not currently available. He further advised that staff will pursue other funding options available. Mayor Washburn further commented on the recent discussions with GTE regarding the phone book covers. MAYOR WASHBURN ANNOUNCED AT 8:19 P.M. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL WOULD BE RECESSING IN MEMORY OF DAVID VIK, "MR. RODEO" AND LONG TIME RESIDENT AND RODEO SUPPORTER. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:32 P.M. CLOSED SESSION THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 8:32 P.M. TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION. THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:31 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN. ADJOURNMENT - MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE 9:32 P.M. BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE REfULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT w~~. h /Lb, JJ--- GARY . WASHBURN, MAYOR CIT F LAKE ELSINORE ( +TTEST: .. ~ ()\ - ()~ n .' J ~~J~. ciTy CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE -