Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-24-1990 City Council Minutes MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JULY 24, 1990 ****************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER - The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Washburn at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Buck. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. John Empson, 32825 Macy Street, read the following letter: My name is John Empson, I reside at 32825 Macy Street, Lake Elsinore, California. I'm here tonight to register my complaint regarding the city Council's method of letting people speak at public hearings. Open discussion can be a valuable avenue for the members of the City Council. My problem is that on many discussions, people from Riverside County voice their pro's and con's and I feel they should not be permitted to speak on City matters. If you permit everyone to speak, they should clearly identify themselves if they are residents of the City of Lake Elsinore or the County of Riverside. I have in my possession, copies of the petition and letters AGAINST General Plan Amendment 90-1 and Zone Change 90-2. The results I came up with on the petition are: 31% city residential 68% Riverside County residential 1 letter residential My own letter (not included in the copies provided to me) Letter in favor - 5 from real estate firms and/or developers. The same problem occurred at your public hearing on a Cable TV application. I am determined to follow up this matter with the Grand Jury Chairman in Riverside, CA in the near future. Thank you, John J. Empson (He submitted the letter to the City Clerk.) f PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 2. Kim Quon, vice President of the Downtown Business Association, 117 S. Main street commented on Item #53 of this Agenda relating to Ordinance No. 898. He expressed concern with the city council choosing representatives for the Downtown Design Review committee for the Association. He also expressed concern that the D.B.A. was not contacted prior to consideration of this Ordinance to work out a viable alternative with the city council. He encouraged denial of this ordinance. 3. George Alongi, 649 Mill Street, Secretary of the D.B.A., also expressed concern with the adoption of the proposed Ordinance -- No. 898. He commented that it would not build a good relationship between the City and the D.B.A. in that it does not allow them to make decisions affecting them. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS None. CONSENT CALENDAR The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No. 12 MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: a. Planning commission Meeting - July 5, 1990. 2. Received and ordered filed the Animal control Activity Report for June, 1990. - 3. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for June, 1990. 4. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for June 30, 1990. 5. Ratified the Warrant List for July 16, 1990. 6. Approved the C.D.B.G. Urban County/City Agreement and authorized the Mayor and city Clerk to execute the necessary documents. 7. Approved the Memorandum of Understanding on a Waste Generation Study with the County of Riverside and the cities of Riverside county and authorized the Mayor and city Clerk to execute the M.O.U. 8. Approved Memorandum of Understanding with the Public Employees Association of Riverside county, Inc. for fiscal year 1990-91 and adopted a new appendix "C" to the personnel rules and regulations to reflect the cost of living adjustments applicable to all city employees. 9. Adopted Resolution No. 90-66 - Making Preliminary Findings, Directions and Designating Persons to Perform Duties related to Assessment District 90-2 (Tuscany Hills - Phase I). - RESOLUTION NO. 90-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, MAKING PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND DIRECTIONS AND DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 DUTIES RELATED TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-2 (TUSCANY HILLS - PHASE I. 10. Adopted Resolution No. 90-67 - Requesting the Tax Collector to Place Assessments on the Bills of Properties in Assessment District No. 89-1 - Summerhill Bridge Improvements. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO PLACE ASSESSMENTS ON THE BILLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES. 11. Adopted Resolution No. 90-68 - Requesting the Tax Collector to Place Assessments on the Bills of Properties in Assessment District No. 87-2 - Shoppers Square. RESOLUTION NO. 90-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA REQUESTING THE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO PLACE ASSESSMENTS ON THE BILLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES. 13. Accepted Notice of Completion for the 1990 Asphalt Resurfacing Project. 14. Accepted Release of Deferral Agreement for 507 Pottery Street (APN#374-05l-0l2) . 15. Approved public hearing date of August 14, 1990 for the following: a. Zone Chanqe 89-13 and Annexation #51 = John Crehan. A request for annexation and pre-zoning that will permit low density residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre) to be planned on a 161.88 acre site. The project is located in the Southwest quarter of Section 27, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, off Greenwald at Northgate of Canyon Lake. b. Tentative Financial Parcel Map 25638 = Lonq Beach Equities. A request to approve Tentative Financial Parcel Map 25638 which subdivides 251 acres into four parcels, for financial purposes. The project is located on all four quadrants of the interchange of I-15 and Nichols Road. c. A public hearinq to adopt the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Mitiqation Fee Ordinance in accordance with the Short-term Habitat Date. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 12. New Council Policy = Relating to Reconsideration of Aqenda Items. Mayor Washburn explained the intent of the proposed policy. Councilman Buck expressed concern that this policy would require a majority Council vote to allow for reconsideration. He questioned the ability to reschedule an item because new information has been uncovered. Councilman Dominguez concurred with Councilman Buck and suggested that the current process is working and shouldn't be changed. f PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 city Manager Molendyk commented that the current process is strictly an informal policy which allows any councilmember to agendize an item. Mayor Washburn inquired whether the time frame in the policy was too prohibitive. Councilman Buck suggested that any time limit could be too restrictive depending on the circumstances. councilman Winkler commented on the intent of this policy to remove staff from the loop and give them a specific direction with regard to reconsideration. He suggested that the 7 day limitation be changed to a timely basis. City Attorney Harper commented that would normally be 10 days and clarified that a councilmember could bring back any item. councilman Winkler suggested a 30 day limitation. ... Councilman Buck expressed concern with setting a time limit at all. city Attorney Harper recommended that a time limit be set to clarify timely for staff. Council discussion ensued. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO TABLE THIS ITEM AND REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REVIEW AND REWRITE. PUBLIC HEARINGS 31. General Plan Amendment 90-1 and Zone Chanqe 90-2 - Pentaqon Development/Hunsaker. continued from June 26, 1990. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the prior meetings and considerations of this project and detailed the council's alternatives. - city Attorney Harper further commented on the options available to Council with regard to density and zoning. community Development Director Gunderman further explained that the zoning is not as critical at this point as the General Plan Designation. The city Clerk reported no additional written comments to those previously submitted and detailed. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. aSking those in favor of this item to speak. The following people spoke: Bill Allen, applicant, representing Pentagon Development, 16377 Lakeshore Drive, advised that they are looking forward to resolving the problems with this project, and briefly summarized the previous considerations. Bob McClellan, 31000 Airway Avenue, suite 123, Costa Mesa, advised that he as been one of the property owners of this site since 1984. He explained that they originally held 107 acres at this location and the projects that have already been approved or constructed. He also explained the difficulty in developing the remaining portion of the property and detailed its limitations. - Melanie Fitch, 31000 Airway Avenue, commented on her review of the citizens concerns relating to this project, and detailed the correspondence received and questionnaires completed. f PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 Ed Fitch, 4600 Birch, suite 2900, Newport Beach, detailed prior considerations and work with the city for the other developments on the property and explained the original thinking with regard to the commercial potential of this property. He explained the access and circulation limitations of the property. ---- Paul Salata, Costa Mesa, advised that he is also a general partner in the ownership of this property and that he has discussed this property and its best use extensively with the city. He detailed the storm drain and road improvements which they have worked with the City to provide. He reminded the Council that the original Staff recommendation for this issue was approval, but the Planning Commission recommended denial. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. The following people spoke: Steve Fischer, 15701 Shadow Mountain, advised that the residents of this area have met several times with Mr. Allen to work out a compatible project. He further advised that there are serious concerns with traffic circulation and the density of the proposed project. He commented that the residents could accept condominiums more readily than apartments at a limited density. Lou Prijatel, explained the opposition to this project that has been expressed by the neighborhood. He also explained that the residents were willing to discuss R-l or R-2, but are completely opposed to R-3. He advised that the residents are concerned with obtaining parks, traffic signals and a site for the hang gliders. Other residents speaking in opposition on the basis of traffic concerns, density,vacancy rate of nearby apartments and the need for parks were: Jeanne Fischer, 15701 Shadow Mountain John Empson, 32825 Macy Street Barbara Nation, Laguna Street Robert Neeson, 33665 Macy Street Judy LipoId, 33063 Macy Street Bob Lincoln, 33182 Lime Street Joe Sanchez, 15631 Laguna Larry Exert, 15660 Lake Terrace Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. Mayor Washburn commented that the commercial aspect might not be productive due to the related traffic problems, etc. and concurred that the condo approach might be better. Councilman Buck questioned the ability of Council to restrict the density within R-3 Zoning. Community Development Director Gunderman explained the the density should be handled under the General Plan. City Attorney Harper elaborated on this point explaining that the density could be restricted, but the type of ownership could not be set by Council. Councilman Buck further questioned the ability to zone the property R-2 and allow for increases if appropriate. City Attorney Harper advised that this could not be done because the density limit of R-2 is 12 units per acre. Councilman Winkler questioned the comment that commercial development is inappropriate for this property, and inquired if growth in the area would make it appropriate at a later date. Mr. McClellan explained the limitations of the market PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 area for this site. Councilman Starkey inquired if this piece of land was an oversight. Mr. McClellan explained that it occurred in he process of making the other projects marketable. Councilman winkler commented that in his opinion the increased growth in five years might make the commercial use of this property feasible. He also inquired whether Commercial would generate more traffic than an R-3 use. community Development Director Gunderman advised that Commercial would generate considerably more traffic than R-3. - councilman winkler further commented on the private property ownership potential and the constraints of traffic circulation around the lake. He also questioned the progress in securing parks in this area. Mr. Fischer advised that the residents have been meeting with staff and have identified some potential locations. Councilman Winkler suggested that this item be held for the revised General Plan. He questioned the traffic signal at Grand Avenue and Ortega Highway. Staff advised that the design has been budgeted for the signal and there is an informal agreement with Caltrans for 2/3rds of the signal cost. Councilman Dominguez advised that he has reviewed this project since the original commercial designation, but has reservations with regard to the traffic impact on the area. He also commented that it if people are looking for a small town atmosphere this is not it. Further discussion with regard to ownership options and density ensued. - MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH WASHBURN CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO DENY THIS REQUEST FOR ZONE CHANGE AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT WITH CONSIDERATION OF THE AREA TO RETURN WITH THE ENTIRE GENERAL PLAN. 32. City-Wide Liqhtinq and Landscapinq Maintenance District. Resolution No. 90-69 - Confirming Assessments. Public Services Director Kirchner detailed the process for annual confirmation of the assessments .in this District. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 9:17 p.m. asking those in favor of this item to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 9:18 p.m. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-69: RESOLUTION NO. 90-69 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY AFTER FORMATION OF A DISTRICT. 33. West Lake Elsinore Development Aqreement. 1 PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 Ordinance No. 899. ---- Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this agreement and its deal points. He advised that this agreement pertains to approximately 1,600 homes. He recommended that if the Council decides to approve the agreement, it should be approval in concept pending consideration of the Funding and Acquisition Agreement. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 9:24 p.m. asking those interested in this agreement to speak. The following person spoke: Jeff Robinson, attorney for the developers, offered to answer any questions from Council. Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 9:24 p.m. Councilman Buck questioned the Funding and Acquisition Agreement, the park property, the $75,000 per acre figure and the fire station. Community Development Director Gunderman clarified the issues raised by Councilman Buck. Councilman Winkler commented on what was originally a 30 acre park and has now become a 15 acre park. He suggested that more improvements should be available through the Development Agreement process. He expressed concern that this is not an adequate amount of park space for the number of homes. He also questioned the school site. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that it would be designated at the final map stage. Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with the current park size and the fire station requirements and with the apparent reduction in the deal points of the agreement. Councilman Starkey further commented on the reduction in the original 30 acre park. Mayor Washburn highlighted his concerns including Page 36 of 140 regarding the intent in the acquisition and the relation of the land dedication. He also questioned page 38 of 140 regarding the Mello-Roos District and fulfillment of the entire obligation to assist if provisions of financing the park & recreation, fire protection, storm drains, street improvements and traffic control. He also questioned the ability to condition Mr. Dale's project in the future for additional open space of recreation facilities. On page 39 of 140, line 3, he questioned the requirement to "explore and agree" on alternate funding sources. City Attorney Harper clarified that the agreement would require that the City explore the options in good faith, but not necessarily agree. Mayor Washburn suggested that page 51 of 140 be modified with regard to the time frames. He recommended the following: Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel Map - 120 days Final Subdivision Map - 60 days Amendment to this Agreement - 60 days Design Review - 60 days Use Permit - 60 days Building Permit - 60 days On page 55 of 140 he questioned the annual review and the burden of responsibility for this process. City Attorney Harper advised that in reality this was a shared J PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 responsibility, and any costs incurred would be minimal. On page 57 of 140 he requested that the city be notified of any assignment or transfer of the project. city Attorney Harper advised that this was inherent in the processes that would be required to release the current developers and allow assumption of the project. Mayor Washburn requested clarification of the parks issues. community Development Director watenpaugh clarified the Mcvicker Canyon Park site, showed conceptual plan of 26 acres with 15 usable acres. Also showed plan of another site in the -- Centex development consisting of 3.92 acres. negotiated adjacent to Terra Cotta School. Tract Map 24624 requires that it be a turn-key park and that is not specifically in the development agreement. He also detailed the proposed funding program for the parks. councilman Buck questioned the 26 acre park site, and whether the City would be paying for the 26 acre total site or only the 15 acre usable portion. community Services Director watenpaugh explained the Quimby Act provisions allowing for acceptance of dedication of land or payment of fee with credit based on appraisal or agreed upon price. councilman Winkler commented on the additional leverage available through the development agreement process. He questioned the timing of the Mcvicker Park and a desirable completion date. He suggested limitation on the certificates of Occupancy if it is not completed by the deadline. Further Council discussion ensued on the acquisition, timing and development of the proposed Parks and the benefit of a development agreement. Mike Allar, representing Cent ex Homes, 3190 Chicago, Riverside, explained the currently proposed parks and the -- limitation of the park sites. He further explained that the current plan is the same approved with the Centex Tract Map. Mayor Washburn commented that the work with the developers has been favorable and concurred that some credit should be given in that regard. John Mandrell, Keith Companies, further commented on the work of the developers and on the need for credit based on the off-site improvements to be provided. He also commented on the need to spread the costs as fairly as possible based on the total costs. Mayor Washburn stressed his belief that the fire station and parks should not be part of the costs assessed on the individual property owners. Councilman Winkler questioned the current standard for parks per 1,000 residents. community Services Director Watenpaugh advised that the current standard is 5 acres per 1,000, which the city has currently satisfied. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT IN CONCEPT AND MODIFY PAGE 36, PAGE 51 AND PAGE 55 AS DISCUSSED AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 899: - ORDINANCE NO. 899 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE WEST LAKE ELSINORE DEVELOPERS (CENTEX REAL ESTATE, LA LAGUNA ESTATES, MARINITA f PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PREMIER HOMES, MEEKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, TOMICH/JONES, TORN RANCH, AND GOLDEN STATE DEVELOPMENT) . UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ~ NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE City Attorney Harper advised that in connection with this agreement, he has been notified that the election will now need to be postponed to August 15, 1990. He requested that the resolution be added to the agenda. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD RESOLUTION 90-71 TO THE AGENDA. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-71. RESOLUTION NO. 90-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE POSTPONING A SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH COMMUNITY FACILI~IES DISTRICT THE COMBINED PROPOSITION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT, AND INCURRING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. 34. Recovery of Expenditures for the Abatement of Weeds. Rubbish. Refuse and Dirt. Community Development Director Gunderman explained this program and the process for the recovery of expenditures. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 10:20 p.m. asking those in favor of this item to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 10:20 p.m. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONFIRM THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO PLACE AN ASSESSMENT WITH THE COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS OFFICER TO RECOVER ALL PERTINENT COSTS AND INTEREST ACCRUED THEREON. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 51. Time Extension Reauest for Tentative Parcel Map 23381 = Camelot Properties. Community Development Director Gunderman addressed a letter received from Camelot Properties and detailed the current progress with the necessary improvements. He also suggested modification of the timeline for completion of all work. Leonard O'Byrne, Camelot Properties, advised that he would have no problem with the 30 day review period. He also f PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 advised that the landscaping work would begin on July 25, but he is concerned with the timing for removal of the tanks in that he is unsure of the County's processing of the permits. Mayor Washburn advised that he would have no problem with a 90 day extension. city Manager Mo1endyk inquired how long the County would take to process the permit. Building Manager Shear estimated 30 to 45 days for final approval. Councilman Buck questioned the delays for the widening of Ma1aga. Mr. O'Byrne advised that he is ready to proceed, but -- he would like to discuss with the new owners of the Casino prior to beginning work. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO AUGUST 28, 1990. BUSINESS ITEMS 52. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 897. Relating to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 897: ORDINANCE NO. 897 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE IMPLEMENTING THE SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1975. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE - ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 53. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 898. Relating to the Central Business Overlay District. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 898: ORDINANCE NO. 898 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.11.050 REGARDING THE CENTRAL BUSINESS OVERLAY DISTRICT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE - ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 54. P1anninq Commission Appointments. Mayor Washburn advised that he and Mayor Pro Tem Starkey had interviewed the five applicants for the two Planning commission seats. He thanked all applicants for their J PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1990 interest and recommended Jeff Brown and Tony Gi1enson be reappointed for terms continuing to June, 1994. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE RE-APPOINTMENT OF JEFF BROWN AND TONY GILENSON TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR TERMS CONTINUING TO JUNE, 1994. - CITY MANAGER COMMENTS None. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Dominguez advised the public that the Downtown project is continuing with anticipated completion in October, 1990. Councilman Winkler commented on Quimby Act fees and requested that staff provide a report reflecting what our Park fees should be. Mayor Washburn reported on his contact with various officials regarding the K-Rat and that receipt of the permit is eminent in the near future, possibly this week. Mayor Washburn also commented on a meeting with LEAF and the local veterinarians to resolve conflicts. CLOSED SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:31 P.M. j .~H~~ F LAKE ELSINORE ! I ~Iu VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE-ELSINORE f