Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-22-1990 City Council Minutes MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 545 CHANEY STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, MAY 22, 1990 ****************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Washburn at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Dominguez. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director Wood, community Development Director Gunderman, Community services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - David Kromer, commented on the achievements of Damon Broadwent and his efforts in aiding him in weed abatement projects. He expressed concern with the Administrative fee the City imposes with regard to Weed Abatement. He suggested that the City consider using students on summer vacation to clear weeds. Damon Broadwent, 33215 Frederick, further commented on the possibility of utilizing students to clear the weeds. Alan Manee, representing the property owners in the vicinity of Macy Street, advised that he is representing approximately 180 property owners with regard to the proposed zone change in that area. He expressed concern that the developer is not taking the residents concerns seriously and requested that Council heed the residents comments that this is an unacceptable proposal. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS A. certificates of Merit - Governor's Office of Emergency Services - Kevin Shear & Robin Chipman. Mayor Washburn commented on the Loma Prieta Earthquake last October and the efforts of City Staff to assist those affected communities. He presented the Governor's Office Certificates of Merit to Kevin Shear and Robin Chipman and commended them for their efforts. - B. Proclamation - Older Californians Month - Robert Martinez, Golden Spectrum. Mayor Washburn read the Proclamation recognlzlng Mayas Older Californians Month and presented it to Robert Martinez, Director of the Golden Spectrum Senior Center. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 2 and 10. Mayor Washburn advised that he would be abstaining from vote on item 1. a . MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: ....i a. April 24, 1990 - Regular city Council Meeting. (Note that vote on this item was 4 to 0 with Washburn abstaining) b. May 8, 1990 - Regular City Council Meeting. The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: c. May 2, 1990 - Planning Commission Meeting. 3. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for April, 1990. 4. Ratified Warrant List for May 15, 1990. 5. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim submitted by Rodney Zamora (CL #90-13). 6. Awarded Contract for the Senior citizens Center Remodel - Project No. 221-4803 to D.W. Jensen Corporation in the amount of $140,658 and authorized transfer of $34,000 from Park Fees to account 221-4803 Senior Center Remodel. 7. Approved Payment of Balance on City Hall Mortgage in the amount of approximately $16,800. 8. Approved Request to Purchase City Owned Property - Frank H. Ayres and Son Construction Company - Residential Project 89-8 and determined that this property is excess property no longer needed by the public and authorized staff to proceed with negotiations. - 9. Adopted Resolution No. 90-44 relating to the City's Eligibility Renewal Application for the Federal Surplus Property Program. RESOLUTION NO. 90-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO SET AUTHORITY FOR CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY. 11. Accepted Dedication of Lot 237 of Tract 20705 and authorized city Clerk to arrange for recordation. 12. Approved Final Parcel Map 24465 located on the North side Collier Avenue and west of Chaney street. 13. Adopted Resolution Nos. 90-46 and 90-47 relating to Tax Allocation Bonds. - RESOLUTION NO. 90-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ISSUANCE BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ITS NOT TO EXCEED $7,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RANCHO LAGUNA PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. I 1990 TAX ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS AND ITS $7,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. II 1990 SUBORDINATE TAX ALLOCATION BONDS. RESOLUTION NO. 90-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF COMMITMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO SALE OF ASSESSMENT BONDS AND SPECIAL TAX BONDS, APPROVING SALE OF SUCH BONDS ON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS, APPROVING OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL ACTION. 14. Approved pUblic hearing date of June 12, 1990 for the following: a. Specific Plan 90-1, Zone Chanqe 90-5, Commercial proiect 90-6 and Environmental Impact Report 90-1 = Lake Elsinore Outlet Center = McArthur/Glen Group. - This Specific Plan proposes the development of a commercial shopping center on a 43.56 acre site. The plan will devote approximately 34 acres to the Outlet Center, 6 acres to community Commercial and 3 acres to Open Space. The zoning is proposed to change from Commercial Manufacturing to Specific Plan. An accompanying Environmental Impact Report addresses the impacts of this development. The site is located immediately southwest of Interstate 15 approximately 500 feet east of the Nichols Road Interchange. b. Zone Chanqe 90-4 and Annexation Number 53 = Wesco Homes, Inc. A request to consider a zone change from Riverside County R-R (Rural Residential) to City R-1 (Single-Family Residential District), and Annexation of a 29.44 acre parcel to the City of Lake Elsinore. The applicant will be proposing a 117 unit single-family development. The site is located on the east side of Stoneman and the south side of the City Limits. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 2. Animal Control Activitv Report for April, 1990. Mayor Washburn requested clarification of funding request. Staff clarified that it would be addressed with the budget consideration. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO RECEIVE AND ORDER FILED THE ANIMAL CONTROL ACTIVITY REPORT FOR APRIL, 1990. 10. Traffic Control Resolution No. 90-45 re1atinq to stop Siqns at Mission Trail/Corvdon. Councilman Dominguez detailed this item for the public. Councilman Buck inquired whether a stop sign could be placed at Ortega Highway and Grand Avenue based on the similar situation. Public Services Director Kirchner advised that this intersection was more complicated in that it was a State Highway so the State, County and City would be involved. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-45. RESOLUTION NO. 90-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN STOP INTERSECTIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Washburn requested that item #36 be heard prior to the other public hearings. Council concurred. ..." 36. Annexation iiI = Meeker Development and Whitinq Ranch. A request to annex approximately 129.41 acres of unincorporated county land into the City of Lake Elsinore located northeasterly of Lincoln Street and east of Grand Avenue. Resolution No. 90-49. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this proposed annexation area which encompasses the Ortega Partners and Marinita Tracts recently approved by the Council. He advised that this initiates the applicants process to apply to LAFCO for approval. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. asking those in favor of this annexation to speak. The following person spoke: Jeff Kenyon, Senior Project Manager, 31 Technology Drive, Irvine, requested approval as a continuation of prior project approvals, and offered to answer questions from Council. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m. - Councilman Buck commented that he felt the concerns in that area had been addressed. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-49 APPROVING COMMENCEMENT OF ANNEXATION NO. 47, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: RESOLUTION NO. 90-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 47 - MEEKER DEVELOPMENT". 31. Briqhton/Alberhill Ranch Development Aqreement. Ordinance No. 890. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this agreement which covers only a portion of the total proposed development. He also detailed the deal points of the proposal including a champion golf course and an affordable housing clause. - The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. asking those in favor of this agreement to speak. The following PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 ..... person spoke: Ken Meddock, Director of Land Development, Brighton Homes, 505 N. Tustin, Suite 250, Santa Ana, explained that this agreement is for a portion of the approved specific plan and detailed the extension of existing infrastructure necessary. He also commented on the negotiation points and requested that the clause relating to affordable housing be equitable with the requirements placed by other recent development agreements. He offered to answer questions from Council. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 7:39 p.m. Councilman Starkey supported the need for a golf course in this community. Councilman Buck recommended that the water storage facilities discussed on Page 10, Item D, be placed under ground for aesthetic purposes. Mayor Washburn inquired whether the applicant had received the new verbiage relating to affordable housing. Mr. Meddock advised that they had, but again commented that it should be comparable to the verbiage in other development agreements. Discussion ensued with regard to the equity of the affordable housing clause and the impact of commercial development in offsetting the costs. ~ Councilman Buck requested clarification on the floor area ratios in the specific plan, particularly with regard to office space and commercial areas. Mr. Meddock clarified that some two story buildings would be utilized to meet those ratios. Staff clarified that the project would still need to meet the zoning code and general plan standards. Councilman Dominguez further questioned the water storage facilities. Mr. Meddock commented that they were being required to include an 8 million gallon water tank and they are reviewing alternatives with berming and landscaping to camoflauge it as much as possible, but it would still be partially visible from the freeway. Further discussion took place relating to berming and aesthetic considerations for the water tank. Mayor Washburn questioned the some what conditional verbiage with regard to the golf course. Mr. Meddock explained that this was included to allow for flexibility once the studies are completed. Council requested further clarification of this reasoning. Mr. Meddock explained that they are reviewing riparian area requirements, financing ability and the future market for the final product. Council questioned the phasing plan and at what point the golf course would be installed. He explained that the construction activities would not begin for at least 12 to 18 months due to extensive grading required. .---- Councilman Buck suggested that the development agreement be done at the time pending studies are complete. Mayor Washburn stressed the importance of the golf course to the consideration, and his discomfort with the existing agreement. Councilman Winkler inquired in the case the golf course is not built what justification is there for the City to approve this agreement. Councilman Starkey inquired further into the study outcomes and what they might be and how they would impact the project. Mr. Meddock explained that due to the topography, riparian PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 areas and financial constraints the golf course might not be feasible. Mayor Washburn suggested that this agreement be postponed to the next meeting to allow Councilman Buck and himself to work as a committe~ to finalize negotiations. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE JUNE 12TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE MENTIONED COMMITTEE TO FINALIZE NEGOTIATIONS. 32. Ramsqate Specific Plan Development Aqreement. Ordinance No. 892. ..r Community Development Director Gunderman detailed the bargaining points of this agreement including the funding for a civic Center study, $1,000 per unit development fee, development of a community park, and point of sale for supplies in the City. Hardy Strozier, planning consultant, elaborated on the affordable housing verbiage suggested and the need to implement this type of clause to meet current and upcoming affordable housing requirements. The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. asking those in favor of this agreement to speak. The following person spoke: Bill Frey, 108 N. Riverview Drive, Anaheim, representing L.D. Johnson, concurred with the comments of Mr. Strozier, but expressed concern that the City does not have an adopted Housing Element. He requested Council consideration of reworking the affordable housing condition. .... Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 8:42 p.m. Councilman Dominguez questioned the acreage of the proposed neighborhood park. Mr. strozier advised that the final amount had not been determined, but it should be approximately 5 acres. Councilman Buck advised that discussions had been proceeding for the last year and all requests have been met. Mayor Washburn questioned the request of the applicant with regard to the affordable housing condition. City Attorney Harper concurred with Mr. strozier in that upcoming needs for housing need to be addressed on an ongoing basis. Mr. strozier further detailed the impact of future requirements on the current development trend. Mayor Washburn complimented the applicant and staff on their efforts to negotiate the final agreement. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 892: ..... ORDINANCE NO. 892 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH RIALTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, WHICH DOES BUSINESS AS L.D. JOHNSON COMPANIES. PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ~ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER 33. General Plan Amendment 90-1 ~ Zone Chanqe 90-2 - Pentagon Development. continued from May 8, 1990. Community Development Director Gunderman advised that the developer has requested a continuance of this item to June 26, 1990 for resolution of issues with the neighborhood group. MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER TO JUNE 26, 1990. 34. Ordinance No. 894. Urgency Interim Ordinance Adopting a Moratorium in the East Floodplain Area and city Lake Perimeter. ~ Community Development Director Gunderman explained the history of this moratorium which was established to allow time to develop appropriate land uses and circulation plans. He advised that the current proposal is for a 60 day extension to July 24, 1990 at which time staff would return with a master plan for adoption. He also requested that Council authorize the formation of a committee of 2 Planning commissioners, 2 councilmembers, John Ballew and Planning Department Staff to complete this preparatory work. Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. asking those in favor of this Ordinance to speak. No one spoke. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. The following person spoke: Emerson Brigham, property owner, requested clarification of the boundaries of the proposed moratorium area. Staff advised that they were the same as previously set. Mr. Bingham detailed the history of this moratorium and expressed concern that points of the law were not being properly fulfilled, such as reports relating to extension of time, number of extensions, etc. He questioned the need to keep existing commercial property in this moratorium area, and what this moratorium would do that the other have not. Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 9:56 p.m. city Attorney Harper commented with regard to the legal requirements for moratoriums and explained the city's previous actions. Councilman Buck inquired whether staff feels the work can be accomplished in the 60 days allotted. Community Development Director Gunderman confirmed that he feels this work can be done and work will proceed. Councilman Starkey advised that he feels this process has taken too long already, but he will agree with 60 more days. He further advised that after that time the property needs to be released. PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 Councilman Dominguez commented that he does not like moratoriums, but feels progress is being made and the City needs to finish the work in progress. Mayor Washburn requested that the the second 30 days of this period staff set up meeting with the land owners to keep them advised of the progress to that point. City Manager Mo1endyk suggested that Counci1members Buck and Starkey be appointed to the previously mentioned Committee. MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO CONTINUE THE MORATORIUM FOR 60 DAYS SUBJECT TO A 30 DAY REVIEW AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 894. -- ORDINANCE NO. 894 ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ON PROPERTIES IN THE EAST FLOODPLAIN AREA AND CITY LAKE PERIMETER AREA TO INCLUDE IN THE MORATORIUM CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE AREA NORTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED INLET CHANNEL DEFINED AS BEING BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY LAKEPOINT PARK, ON THE NORTH BY LAKE SHORE DRIVE, ON THE EAST BY THE SAN JACINTO RIVER, AND THEN SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE INLET CHANNEL NEAR THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, 2) THE AREA LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF CEREAL STREET AND BOUNDED BY CORYDON ROAD ON THE SOUTHEAST AND THE CITY LIMITS ON THE SOUTHWEST AND 3) THE LAKE PERIMETER AREA BEGINNING AT THE CITY BOUNDARY AT BONNIE LEA DRIVE AND THE LAKE, CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY TO GRAND AVENUE, AND THEN INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE LAKE SIDE BOUNDARIES OF GRAND AVENUE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, AND LAKESHORE DRIVE, AND TERMINATING AT LAKEPOINT PARK. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN - NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER 35. Joint Exercise of Power Agreement Creatinq the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. Community -Development Director Gunderman detailed this request and explained the necessary actions including allocations of the program and authorization to proceed with appraisals. He advised the the M.O.U. should be returning for approval in approximately three weeks. The city Clerk reported no written comments or protests. Mayor Washburn opened the pUblic hearing at 9:03 p.m. those in favor of this item to speak. No one spoke. Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing the public hearing was closed at 9:04 p.m. asking Mayor no one MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-48. - RESOLUTION NO. 90-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA BECOMING A PARTY TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 AGENCY. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS ---- 51. Reauest from Rancon. A request for Condition Reconsideration relating to freeway landscaping requirements. community Development Director Gunderman reminded Council of its previous direction with regard to the condition in question, and explained that thus far a uniform program for freeway landscaping has not been adopted. He detailed the alternatives including requirements that the applicant comply with the conditions, that the applicant participate in a future program, or that the applicant participate in a future program and install a portion of the landscaping at this time. Mayor Washburn advised that he feels the condition as stated previously is an appropriate requirement, in that other City's are already doing it and suggested that staff work with the developer to work out any problems Caltrans may be contributing to the situation. Councilman Dominguez suggested that the third alternative of participation in a future program and landscaping is appropriate as an interim measure. city Attorney Harper commented that this type of program could be maintained as part of the existing lighting and landscaping assessment district with the establishment of an additional benefit assessment zone. ~ Councilman Buck suggested either alternative 2 or 3 mentioned above. Councilman Dominguez questioned whether this would be consistent with requirements on other freeway projects. Council discussion ensued with regard to alternatives and the restrictions which may be imposed by Caltrans. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER TO DENY THE REQUEST AND REQUIRE RANCON TO INSTALL THE LANDSCAPING AND PARTICIPATE IN THE FUTURE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. City Attorney Harper suggested that this item be continued for two weeks to allow staff to develop an appropriate condition. Council questioned the cost factor for this type of landscaping. city Manager Molendyk advised that the best information we have is that it will cost $1 million for one four corner intersection. THE ABOVE MENTIONED MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN WITH PERMISSION OF THE SECOND. ~ MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JUNE 26, 1990. Mayor Washburn commented that he would like to see this project act as a catalyst to start work on the rest of the program. 52. Industrial Project 90-3 = CHS Partnership. Design review approval of a 14,425 square foot industrial PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 building on a 1.01 acre parcel located approximately 300 feet south of the southwest corner of Minthorn and Birch. Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request, and the reasoning for postponement on the construction of the wall. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0 WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-11 AND APPROVE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 90-3 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ..... Findings: 1. The project is consistent with Goals, Policies and Objectives of the current General Plan. 2. No significant environmental impacts will result from this project. 3. If the attached conditions are met, this project will meet the design directives of Chapters 17.38, 17.56, 17.82, and 17.66 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Planning Division Conditions: 1. Design review approval will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year. An extension of time, up to one (1) year per extension, may be granted by the Planning Commission prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval upon application by the developer one (1) month prior to expiration. 2. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented __ within the project design in all phases and/or adhered to strictly. 3. These Conditions of Approval shall be attached or reproduced upon Page One of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety. 4. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform with the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 5. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development director or his designee. 6. Buildings shall be constructed as depicted on plans or as modified by the Community Development Director or his designee. 7. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of __ utilities. 8. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures . PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 9. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Building Official. All building pads are to be one foot (1') above the 100 year flood plan. 10. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 11. Meet all State handicap requirements. 12. Meet all Riverside County Health Department requirements. - 13. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 14. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. 15. No roof ladders shall be permitted. 16. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire rating. 17. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection and shall include emergency vehicle turning radius, and fire resistance requirements for all buildings including sprinklers where required, and any additional requirements requested by the Fire Marshal. A fire detector check assembly shall be required for any interior fire lanes and hydrants. A letter shall be submitted verifying compliance prior to issuance of building permits. 18. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least six-inches (6") lower than the parapet wall or top of equipment well and shall be painted to match the building. Evidence of compliance shall be included in building plans. 19. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 20. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the building. 21. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to blend with the center's design theme. Mailbox Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the approval of the postal service and the Community Development Director or his designee. 22. DELETED. - 23. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant for a $100.00 per plan fee, and the Community Development Director or his designee. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering coverage. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30-feet apart and at least twenty-four inches (24") box in size, as approved by the community Development Director. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch (6") high and six-inch (6") wide concrete curb. d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). ..... e) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the city's adopted Landscape Guidelines. f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and receive additional enhanced screening. g) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120% Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion of installation of landscape requirements approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year. h) All trees to be planted shall be 50% 24 inch box and 50% 15 gallon specimens. i) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. j) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. k) Applicant shall adjust tree locations in front set back are to allow for the placement of a monument sign. 24. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. - 25. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. Plans for the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be included with building plans and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee prior to the issuance of building permits. 26. Any security lighting located on-site shall be ornamental and shall be shown on building plans, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or his designee. 27. Applicant shall annex project into the City's Landscape and Lighting District. - 28. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program for the center which specifies harmonious and consistent colors, materials and specifications which will enhance the center's design and meet the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter 17.94. The Master PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 Signage Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. All signage including free-standing signs shall be by city Permit and in conformance with the approved Master signage Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual sign permits are required prior to the erection of each sign. - 29. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. - 30. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two-feet (2') apart. 31. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping and shall meet City Standards for loading zones. This project shall be designed so that every unit is provided with a loading space as required by the city's Municipal Code. 32. A six-foot (6') high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north side property line and shall conform to section 17.14.080 (Fences and Walls), subject to the approval of the community Development Director. Said wall shall be constructed of the split-face masonry to match the masonry of building. In lieu of the construction of said wall applicant shall provide to the City a guarantee of funds sufficient to construct said wall in a manner approved by the city Attorney. 33. Trailers utilized during construction shall be approved by Planning Division. 34. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. 35. Any additional required dedications for public right-of-way shall be provided for on site plan. 36. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. Enqineerinq Department Conditions: 37. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit is issued. - 38. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (Municipal Code, Title 165, Chapter 16.34, Resolution No. 85-26). 39. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department, from the applicable water agency, stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 40. If the existing street improvements are to be modified, existing street plans on file shall be modified PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 accordingly and approved by the city Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. an encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 41. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of off-site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution No. 83-78). 42. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the city Engineer. -- 43. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 44. contribute $100.00 towards the City'S Master Entryway Sign Program. 45. Developer shall contribute $3,900.00 towards the design and construction of a traffic signal at Central and Collier. This development will increase traffic at the intersection at least 3% and should contribute 3% towards construction. 46. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.68 of the Municipal Code regarding floodplain management. 47. Meet all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the Municipal Code regarding flood hazard regulations. 48. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of grading permit. 49. Applicant shall comply with all Conditions of approval -- for Parcel Map 21297 that apply to this site. The conditions shall be complied with at building permit stage if not completed when the Parcel Map was recorded. County Fire Department Conditions: 50. The Fire Department is required to set a m~n~mum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 51. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 52. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"X4"X2-l/2"X2-l/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than l65-feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. - 53. Applicant/Developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 ~ registered engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department". 54. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. 55. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire spinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 56. Install a supervised water flow fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as required by the Uniform Building Code. 57. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code. 58. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must appear on the title page of the building plans. ~ 59. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, section 503. 60. certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 61. Install portable fire extinguishers with a m1n1mum rating of 2A-IOBC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 62. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of 1$413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 63. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and safety. ~ 53. County-wide Park Assessment District. community Services Director watenpaugh advised that this is a measure County Parks Department has been working on for some time, and that it would offer a number of possible benefits to the city. possible uses might be assistance in the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat areas and a regional park in the floodplain. city Manager Molendyk further clarified that this would be an approval in concept and a future study session would be scheduled to review the proposal. Councilman Dominguez requested clarification that this was only support of the proposal. city Manager Molendyk advised that this was the question of placing the ballot measure on the 1990 ballot or the 1992 ballot. PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 Councilman Winkler commented that postponement of this item until the 1992 election would be too long, because land costs will be increased. He also commented on the request before LAFCO to allow the ortega Trails Recreation and Park District to encompass Wildomar and the potential for City residents to be assessed twice via the Park District and via this proposed County-wide District. He suggested that the City give conditional support for the 1990 ballot, but withdraw for further review if LAFCO approves the Park District annexation as proposed. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED BALLOT MEASURE FOR THE 1990 BALLOT CONDITIONED AS MENTIONED ABOVE WITH REGARD TO THE LAFCO HEARING ON THURSDAY. ..... 54. Desiqnation of Southern California Joint Powers Authoritv Director and Alternate. After discussion, Council concurred to reappoint Councilman Winkler as the Director and Mayor Washburn as the Alternate. BUSINESS ITEMS 55. Second Readinq ~ Ordinance No. 891. Relating to the Pardee-Grossman/cottonwood Canyon Development Agreement. MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 891: ORDINANCE NO. 891 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ALBERHILL RANCH ASSOCIATES. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: - AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 56. Second Readinq ~ Ordinance No. 893. Relating to Zone Change for Partin Development. MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 893: ORDINANCE NO. 893 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH RIALTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, WHICH DOES BUSINESS AS L.D. JOHNSON COMPANIES. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, ~ WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 22, 1990 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS None. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS - councilman Dominguez commented on a seminar Council attended in Lake Arrowhead and his contacts with other city officials. He complimented staff and council for the way this City is addressing problems and mitigating concerns that other cities have not dealt with. Councilman Starkey reminded the public of the upcoming Frontier Days Rodeo Events during the Memorial Day Weekend. Councilman Winkler commented on an article in the Press-Enterprise with regard to the lack of local distribution centers for food stamps. He requested that staff continue to pursue options to solve this problem. Councilman Buck reminded residents of the upcoming Chili Cookoff at city Park on June 9, 1990; which is sponsored by Golden spectrum, AARP and NARFE. Mayor Washburn requested that in cases where Council has reached consensus on an item, staff work with department heads to develop a policy for reconsideration requiring 4j5ths vote to reconsider. Mayor Washburn also commented that the work on the downtown area is underway beginning with Gediman Park. ~ CLOSED SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COU~CIL MEETING AT 9:59 P.M. GARY M. WASHBURN, MAYOR CITY LAKE ELSINORE A~TEST: . ' 21t ~! .... \- , ' , ,. -:.A~ "'; " VICKI KKSAD,Y CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE -