HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-24-1990 City Council Minutes
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990
******************************************************************
CALL 1Q ORDER
-
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Washburn at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Alleqiance was led by Councilman Starkey.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, City Attorney Harper,
Administrative Services Director Wood, Community Development
Director Gunderman, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public
Services Director Kirchner and City Clerk Kasad.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
-
1. Beverly Burns, 33041 Walls Street, representing Lake Elsinore
Hang Gliding Association, commented on the history of hang
gliding in Lake Elsinore. She expressed concern with
development infringing on their open space.
2. Cindy Gall, 209 Portland, Huntington Beach, representing
Chapter 133 of the United States Hang Gliding Association,
commented on the recreational value of the Lake Elsinore area
and stressed the need for a hang gliding site in this valley.
3. Mark Galbreath, Gerald Smith and Ramee Vermeul1en also
representing the local hang gliders, concurred with previous
comments.
4. Kevin Jeffries, 17666 Grand Avenue, requested that Council
consider studying annexation of remaining County areas in the
City'S sphere of influence. He also suggested consideration
of electing Councilmembers by District.
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
A. Proclamation = 17th Annual Frontier Davs.
Mayor Washburn read the proclamation recognizing Frontier Days
and presented it to Chamber of Commerce President Arta
Valenzuela. Arta recognized Dave vic and Pam Johnson for
their work with Frontier Days and the Miss Frontier Days
Pageant. Pam Johnson introduced this year's 16 contestants
~ for Miss Frontier Days.
Tami Spraque, reigning Miss Frontier Days, presented the Mayor
and Council with a plaque commemorating the City's support of
the annual Frontier Days programs.
B. Proclamation = Earth ~ 1990.
Mayor Washburn read the proclamation and presented it to
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Community Services Director Watenpaugh for conveyance to the
School District.
C. Presentation.
Mayor Washburn presented a plaque and pen set to former Mayor
Winkler and former Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez, respectively, and
thanked them for the work over the last two years.
CONSENT CALENDAR
~
The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further discussion and consideration:
Item Nos. 2, 11, 12, 14 and 17.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. March 27, 1990 - Regular City Council Meeting.
b. April 10, 1990 - Regular City Council Meeting.
c. April 17, 1990 - Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting.
The following Minutes were received and filed:
d. March 19, 1990 - Special Planning Commission Meeting.
e. March 21, 1990 - Planning Commission Meeting.
f. April 4, 1990 - Planning Commission Meeting.
g. April 5, 1990 - Special Planning Commission Meeting.
3. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for
March, 1990.
4. Received and ordered filed the Code Enforcement Activity
Report for March, 1990.
5. Received and ordered filed the Structure Abatement Activity
Report for March, 1990.
.....
6. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for March,
1990.
7. Ratified Warrant Lists from the following dates:
a. March 30, 1990.
b. April 16, 1990.
8. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim
submitted by Samuel Howard Bishop, Jr. (CL #90-10).
9. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim
submitted by Judith May Green (CL #90-11).
10. Rejected Northwest Sewer Project Equipment Bids received on
March 29, 1990.
13. Accepted Proposal for Annual Audit Services from KPMG Peat
Marwick and awarded the audit for the three year period.
..J
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
15. Approved Claim for Funds under the Transportation Development
Act of 1971 (Article 4) and Adopted Resolution No. 90-27.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-27
,-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR
FUNDS UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1971 AND
AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO COMPLETE
ALL DOCUMENTS TO SUPPORT CLAIMS FOR FUNDS.
16. Approved & Accepted Right-of-Way Dedication in Tract 24138
for Scales Way as an offsite condition of the tentative map.
18. Accepted Quitclaim Deeds for Water Rights at Various Locations
as follow:
Parcel Map 23381
Ortega West Mobile Estates, 15132 Via Valle
29600 Nichols Street
19. Approved public hearing date of May 8, 1990 for the following:
a. Zone Change 89-16 i Tentative Tract Ma~ 25487 = Partin
Development.
A request to re-zone 48.3 acres of land from R-R (Rural
Residential) to R-l (Low Density Residential), and to
subdivide the site into 134 lots.
ITEMS PULLED EBQH CONSENT CALENDAR
--
2. Animal Control Activity Report = March. 1990.
Councilman Buck inquired of the City Attorney with regard to
activities being undertaken by L.E.A.F. outside their
contractual agreement, such as vaccination clinics. City
Attorney Harper advised that this is an acceptable activity,
and commented that to his knowledge this is being done by the
City'S local veterinarians.
Mayor Washburn advised that he understands that local vets are
not being utilized and suggested a meeting with L.E.A.F to
resolve any misunderstandings.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ANIMAL CONTROL ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MARCH,
1990.
11. Award Qt Contract for Lake Community Center Pro;ect No.
100-4802 = Russell Tourville Construction.
~
Councilman Dominquez expressed concern with the deletion of
the sidewalk project at Lakepoint Park to help fund this
project. He suggested completion of the Lakepoint project in
that it was previously approved.
Community Development Director watenpaugh advised that the
Lakepoint sidewalk Project had been put on hold earlier this
year; and the Community Center is being utilized more than was
originally anticipated, supporting the need for upgrades.
Mayor Washburn advised that he has no problem with staff's
recommendation. Councilman Dominguez stressed his concern
with deleting a project to accomplish another project.
Councilman Winkler commented that the bids have been received
PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
on this project and it is ready to go and should proceed.
Councilman Starkey questioned at what point the $25,000 to be
transferred, would impact the Community Center Project.
Community Services Director Watenpaugh advised that he did not
have that type of breakdown on the project.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4
TO 1 WITH DOMINGUEZ CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO AWARD THE
CONTRACT FOR LAKE COMMUNITY CENTER TO RUSSELL TOURVILLE CONSTRUC- ~
TION IN THE AMOUNT OF $91,201.00.
12. Agreement with County of Riverside for Traffic Signal Proiect
= Mission Trail/Corydon Street.
Councilman Dominguez questioned the timing of this project and
what interim measures could be provided. He was concerned
that one year is too long to go without an alternative. Public
Services Director Kirchner advised that the project is
currently being designed, but will be several months to
complete.
Councilman Dominguez inquired what the possibility of stop
signs in the interim would be. Councilman Winkler questioned
the city's ability to place stop signs in this location, since
a portion is in the county. Public Services Director Kirchner
confirmed that this is a problem because the City owns only
one third of the intersection.
Councilman Dominguez further commented that this is a very
dangerous intersection and requested that the recommendation go
to the County for stop signs in the meantime.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO HAVE STAFF WORK WITH THE COUNTY FOR STOP SIGNS WITH A
REPORT FROM STAFF AT THE NEXT MEETING; AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
AGREEMENT.
...
14. Claim for Funds under ~ Transportation Development Act of
1971 (Article ~ = Resolution No. 90-26.
Councilman Buck questioned that limitation of fund usage on
page two of the Resolution. Administrative Services Director
Wood explained that this is required wording, but funds are
not limited to specific projects.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE CLAIM FOR FUNDS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-26.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR
FUNDS UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1971 AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE ALL DOCUMENTS TO
SUPPORT CLAIMS FOR FUNDS.
17. Rodriauez Disposal Relocation.
Councilman Dominguez requested copies Gf appraisals and
information with regard to potential locations.
Administrative Services Director Wood advised that the current
property is in line with the ultimate redevelopment plan for
the downtown area, and the appraisal will be done at a later
date.
~
Councilman Buck clarified that this is an approval in concept
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
only, concurrently with the action the Redevelopment Agency
approves.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CONCUR WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION.
.....
PUBLIC HEARINGS
31. General ~ Amendment 89-9. Zone Chanqe 89-10. Specific Plan
89-1 Revised. Tentative Parcel MAR 25106 and Commercial
proiect 89-6 = Tomislav Gabric & Associates.
A request to place an Office/retail development on 6.6 acres,
located between Lakeshore Drive and Parkway Avenue and south
of Avenue 6. Resolution No. 90-28 & Ordinance No. 887.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request
for a 80,000 square foot commercial development. He advised
that the current R-l zoning is not a compatible use of the
property. He recommended changing Condition 23.B. to read 24"
box trees.
The City Clerk reported no written comments.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. asking
those in favor of this project to speak. No one spoke.
Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one the publio hearing was closed at 7:44 p.m.
~
Councilman Buck questioned the setback and commented on the
proposed landscaping. He recommended that the developer be
required to utilize a block wall along the back of the
development. Community Development Director Gunderman
clarified that the final landscaping treatment would be
subject to his review, and he understood Council's position.
Mayor Washburn concurred with the plan as it relates to easy
access, but suggested wrought iron or decorative block wall
fencing.
Councilman Winkler advised that the applicant is a client of
his law firm and he would be abstaining from vote.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0
WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-37,
APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-9 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
90-28:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR OF 1990.
APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-10 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 887:
~
ORDINANCE NO. 887
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 6.6 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN LAKE SHORE DRIVE AND PARKWAY
AVENUE AND SOUTH OF AVENUE 6 FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(R-l) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) (TOMISLAV GABRIC AND
ASSOCIATES) .
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
AYES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER
AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 87-1 REVISED, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25106
AND COMMERCIAL PROJECT 89-6 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO
THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
-
Findinas = General Plan Amendment 89-9
1. The existing and proposed General Plan Land Use
designation of Residential (Low Density) is
inconsistent with the surrounding land uses and
the noise generation caused by traffic using the
major arterial (Lakeshore Drive) adjacent to the
site. The placement of Neighborhood Commercial is
consistent and would provide an appropriate buffer to
the residential uses to the north.
2. The proposed change will not result in any
significant adverse impact on the environment.
3. Granting the requested General Plan designation will
permit reasonable development of the property, with
adequate future land use reviews and controls,
consistent with the characteristics of the site and
adjacent properties.
4. The existing and proposed General Plan Land Use
designation change will serve to further the Goals,
Policies and Objectives of the General Plan regarding
the appropriateness and placement of neighborhood
serving commercial uses.
-
5. The General Plan Amendment is compatible with
proposed development patterns in the surrounding
vicinity.
Findinas = Zone Chanae 89-10
1. The proposed C-2 zoning is not anticipated to have
any significant adverse environmental impacts.
2. The present R-l zoning is not consistent with the
requested General Plan Land Use designation of
"General Commercial" contained in General plan
Amendment 89-9.
3. The proposed C-2 zoning is consistent with General
Plan Amendment 89-9.
4. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of
land uses within the City's General Plan and will
bring the property's zoning into conformity with the
General Plan.
-
Plannina Division Conditions = Tentative Parcel MaD 25106:
1. Tentative Parcel Map will expire two (2) years from
date of approval unless an extension of time is
granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Tentative Parcel Map shall comply with the state
of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to
all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval.
-
3. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all
lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
4. Signage for this subdivision shall require City
Permits.
5 . The C\
site
'~JDise Ordinance must be met during all
activity.
-
6. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved
by the Planning Division.
7. All grading shall conform to the requirements of
section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter
70 of the Uniform Building Code.
8. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and
grading for subject development as required by City
Engineer and Chief Building Official.
a) Bonding shall be done by final map (s) for all
other improvements.
9. Pay all applicable fees in force at time of issuance
of building permits.
10. Class II bicycle lane to be provided along Lakeshore
Drive.
11. Prior to final approval of Parcel Map 25106 the
improvements specified herein and approved by the
Planning Commission and the city Council shall be
installed, or the bonds and agreement for said
improvements, shall be submitted to the city, and all
other stated conditions shall be complied with.
12. Final Map shall reflect plotting as approved on plans
date stamped February 21, 1990.
13. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City
Building Department.
14. All improvements shall be designed by developer's
civil engineer to the specifications of the City of
Lake Elsinore.
,-..
15. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County
Fire Department.
16. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
17. The applicant shall provide connection to public
sewer for each lot within the sUbdivision. No service
laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and
shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and
profiles for submittal to the Elsinore Valley
PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
18. The developer shall submit plans to Southern
California Edison for a layout of the street lighting
system. The cost of street lighting, installation as
well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of
the developer and/or the association. Said plans
shall be approved by the City and shall be installed
in accordance with the City Standards.
19. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and
signage shall be subject to Planning Division review
and approval prior to installation.
20. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the
construction phase of this project shall be subject
to approval by the community Development Director.
21. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting
District is required prior to approval of a Final
Parcel Map.
22. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface or
any other site preparation activity will require the
appropriate City Permits. A Geologic Soils Report
with associated recommendations will be required for
grading permit approval, and all grading must meet
the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval
of the Chief Building Official and Planning Division.
Interim and permanent erosion control measures are
required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material
and labor for one (1) year for erosion control
landscaping at the time the site is rough graded.
23. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department.
Enaineering DeDartment:
24. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with
as a condition of development as specified in the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map
approval.
25. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
26. Dedicate sufficient land along southerly boundary to
provide for 100 right-of-way for Lakeshore Drive (50
foot half-street).
27. Dedicate sufficient land along southerly boundary to
provide for sixty (60) foot right-of-way for Avenue 6
(thirty (30) foot half-street). Improve Avenue 6 to
include one (1) parking lane and two (2) travel lanes
(30 foot).
28. Parkway shall be improved to include one (1) parking
lane and two (2) travel lanes (30 foot).
29. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way for corner cutbacks
...".
-
-
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
at lot corners for appropriate radii curb returns.
r--
30. Applicant to dedicate eighty-eight (88) foot
right-of-way (Pottery Street) thru site as shown on
tentative Map. Eighty-eight (88) foot right-of-way
centerline shall match centerline of Avenue 6 to the
north when that section is at the ultimate width as
approved by the City Engineer.
31. Parkway east of new proposed Street should be
abandoned. If it cannot be abandoned then Parkway
shall end in a cul-de-sac at its easterly terminus.
32. Applicant shall process Dawes Street, Avenue 7 and
Irwin Drive abandonments. Abandonments must be
completed prior to final map approval.
33. For the abandonment of Avenue 6 from Dawes Street to
Lakeshore Drive, applicant shall provide a traffic
circulation study. If study shows no adverse effects
in abandoning Avenue 6, it may be abandoned.
34. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
No. 85-26) .
35. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water district,
stating that water and sewer arrangements have been
made for this project. Submit this letter prior to
final map approval.
-
36. Construct all off-site public works improvements per
approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12).
Plans must be approved and signed by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
37. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a civil Engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes
(Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
38. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of public works improvements (Municipal
Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and resolution No.
83-78) .
,-..
39. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie-notes delineated on 8-1/2" x
11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering
Department before final inspection of off-site
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
40. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site
easements for off-site grading from the adjacent
property owners prior to final map approval.
41. Arrangements for relocation of utility company
facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
42. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
43. Provide street lighting and show lighting
improvements on street improvement plans, as required
by the City Engineer.
44. On-site and off-site drainage shall be conveyed to
Lakeshore Drive and directed towards San Jacinto
River by a method approved by the City Engineer.
45. All natural drainage traversing site shall be
conveyed through site, or shall be collected and
conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
46. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final
map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or
erosion downstream caused by development of site and
diversion of drainage.
47. All drainage facilities shall be constricted to
Riverside County Flood Control District Standards.
48. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City
for the construction of public works improvements and
shall post the appropriate bonds.
49. Contribute $14,750 for the design and construction of
half a median on Lakeshore Drive along abutting
property line.
50. Contribute $30,000 towards the widening of the San
Jacinto River Bridge at Lakeshore Drive. Development
will increase traffic volume at the bridge at least
2% and should contribute 2% of the cost of the
bridge.
51. Contribute $600 Toward the City Master Entryway Sign
Program.
52. Developer shall contribute $13,000 towards the design
and construction of a traffic signal at Avenue 6 and
Lakeshore Drive. This development will increase
traffic at the intersection at least 10% and should
contribute 10% towards construction.
53. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including
street design recommendations. Provide final Soils
Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish
grade certification.
54. All storm facilities shall provide tract and
downstream property owners with 100 year storm flood
protection and be approved by the City Engineer.
55. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by
developer per City standards, tapes to be provided
prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
56. All utility easements dedicated on the map will be
approved by the appropriate utility agency prior to
final map approval.
Planninq Division Conditions = Commercial Pro;ect 89-6
1. Design Review approval for Commercial project 89-6
will lapse and be void unless building permits are
issued within one year from the date of City Council
approval.
----
....
.....
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
,......
2. Design review approval will lapse and be void unless
building permits are issued within one (1) year. An
extension of time, up to one (1) year per extension,
may be granted by the Planning Commission prior to
the expiration of the initial Design Review approval
upon application by the developer one (1) month prior
to expiration.
3. All Conditions of approval shall be fully implemented
within the project design in all phases and/or
adhered to strictly.
4. The.. Conditions of Approval shall be attached or
reproduced upon Page One of building plans prior to
their acceptance by the Division of Building and
Safety.
5. All site improvements shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved plot plan and elevations.
Revisions to approved site plans of building
elevations shall be sUbject to Design Review. All
plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check
shall conform with the submitted plans as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission
through subsequent action.
6. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board
shall be used unless modified by the Community
Development Director or his designee.
-
7. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and
release of utilities.
8. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the
City'S Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust
and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the
provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using
accepted techniques. Interim erosion control
measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's
rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer.
9. A final grading plan shall be submitted and shall be
subject to the approval of the Chief Building
Official.
10. Meet all State handicap requirements.
11. Meet all Riverside County Health Department
Requirements.
12. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
13. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City
standards as approved by the Community Development
Director.
-",......
14. No roof ladders shall be permitted.
15. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A"
fire rating.
16. The design and construction of the project shall meet
all county Fire Department standards for fire
protection and shall include emergency vehicle
turning radius, and fire resistance requirements for
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
all buildings including sprinklers where required,
and any additional requirements requested by the Fire
Marshal. A fire detector check assembly shall be
required for any interior fire lines and hydrants. A
letter shall be submitted verifying compliance prior
to issuance of building permits.
17. All roof mounted or other mechanical equipment
incidental to development shall be screened so that
they are not visible from neighboring property or
public streets. any roof mounted central swamp
coolers shall also be screened.
...",
18. All roof mounted equipment shall be at least
six-inches (6") lower than the parapet wall or top of
equipment well and shall be painted to match the
building. Evidence of compliance shall be included in
building plans.
19. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the
building.
20. Any proposed metal mailboxes shall be treated to
blend with the center's design theme. Mailboxes shall
be submitted for approval prior to issuance of
building permits, subject to the approval of the
postal service and the Community Development Director
or his designee.
21. Brick pavers or texture pavement treatments shall be
laid in bank designs and shall be located at the
driveway approaches and crosswalks.
22. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major
commercial uses. Placement, design and quantity shall
be indicated on the final landscaping plan, and
subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
--'
23. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be
reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape
Architect Consultant for a $100.00 per plan fee, and
the Community Development Director or his designee.
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and
automatic sprinkler system with 100% watering
coverage.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from
the City Street Tree List, a maximum of 30-feet apart
and at least 24" box in size, as approved by the
Community Development Director.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved
areas with a six-inch (6") high and six-inch (6")
wide concrete curb.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15") of
ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
-
e) The Landscape plan shall provide for ground cover,
shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the
City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
f) Landscape planters shall include an appropriate
parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot
'!F .
:'
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
"....
shading in fifteen years.
g) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscaping plan and
screened as part of the landscaping plan.
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 120%
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion
of installation of landscape requirements
approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and
labor for one (1) year.
i) all landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
within affected portion of any phase at the time a
Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any
building.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with
approved site plan.
k) Final landscape plans to include planting and
irrigation details.
24. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in
height shall have a permanent irrigation system and
erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the
Planning Division.
25. Applicant shall plant street trees on each lot,
selected from the City Street Tree List, 30 feet
apart and at least 15 gallon in size. A single
species shall be used for each street and shall
incorporate solar subdivision design principals. The
planter island within the driveway area may not
encroach into public right-of-way. Plan shall be
submitted to the Community Development Director of
his designee for approval.
26. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets or allow
illumination above the horizontal plane of the
fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the
architecture of the building. No wall park units
shall be permitted.
a) Any security lighting located on-site shall be
ornamental and shall be shown on building plans,
subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director or his designee.
b) security lighting shall be installed and operable
from. dusk. t.., dawn.
-
I ,,-..
I
27. Applican!: 1 annex project into a City Landscape
and Lighting District.
28. The applicant shall develop a Master Signage Program.
for the center which specifies harmonious and
consistent colors, materials and specifications which
will enhance the center's design and meet the
provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter
17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission. All signage
including free-standing signs shall be by City Permit
and in conformance with the approved Master Signage
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Program. The Master Signage Program shall be approved
prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or
release of utilities. Individual sign permits are
required prior to the erection of each sign.
29. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow
striping and shall meet City Standards for loading
zones. This project shall be designed so that ev<"~,
unit is provided with a 12' x 20' loading space as
required by the City's Municipal Code.
30. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
...,
31. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch
(4") lines two-feet (2') apart.
32. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at all
internal one-way drive aisles.
33. A six-foot (6') high masonry wall shall be
constructed along the side and rear property lines
and shall conform to Section 17.14.080 (Fences and
Walls), subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director.
34. Food service uses shall be permitted in this center
only of required parking can be provided in
accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, section
17.66.
35. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department for inclusion in the case records.
Engineering Conditions
36. Applicant shall comply with all conditions of
Tentative Parcel Map 25106. If building permits are
requested prior to Tentative Parcel Map 25106 being
recorded, then all appropriate c"tions of approval
for Tentative Parcel Map 25106 ~. be complied with
prior to building permit.
-
32. General ~ Amendment 89-14. Zone Chanqe a~ '"~i and Annexation
~ 52 = Homestead ~ Development (formerly ~ Investment).
A request to designate a thirty-six acre site as Low Density
Residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre), to change the
Riverside County General Plan designation from Rural
Residential, pre-zone the site to R-1 and Annex from Riverside
County to the City of Lake Elsinore, located south of Scenic
Crest Drive, west of Greenwald Avenue and north of the current
City boundary. Resolution No. 90-29 & Ordinance No. 888.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request
and explained that it includes the pre-zoning of this area
prior to its annexation.
...,.J
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m., aSking
those in favor of this item to speak. No one spoke. Mayor
Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one,
the public hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m.
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Councilman Buck advised that he feels this is an appropriate
area for annexation.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-46; APPROVED GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 89-14 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-29:
,.....
RESOLUTION NO. 90-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR OF 1990.
APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-14 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 888:
ORDINANCE NO. 888
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 36 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, WEST OF
GREENWALD, NORTH OF THE CURRENT CITY BOUNDARY FROM RURAL
RESIDENTIAL (RR) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) (HOMESTEAD
LAND DEVELOPMENT, FORMERLY TMP INVESTMENTS).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
-
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
AND APPROVE ANNEXATION NO. 52 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
Findings = General Plan Amendment 89-14
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a
land use and allow density more in keeping with the
subject property's location, access and site
characteristics.
2. A significant amount of land use circulation and
planning has already been accomplished on surrounding
properties.
3. Planned infrastructure for the adjacent development
will allow the property logical access.
,-....
4. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is
compatible with proposed surrounding uses and
development patterns.
Findings = Zone Change 89-14
1. The present County of Riverside zoning of "Rural
Residential" is not consistent with the requested
General Plan Land Use Designation of "Low Density
Residential" as contained in General Plan
Amendment 89-14.
2. The proposed R-1 zoning, which will become effective
upon annexation, is consistent with the General Plan
Amendment 89-14.
PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
3. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of
land uses within the City's General Plan and will
bring the property into conformity with the General
Plan.
33. General Plan Amendment 89-15 i Zone Chanqe 89-17 = Brookstone
Development.
A General Plan Land Use Designation change from "Environmental
Sensitive" to Limited Industrial and Zone Change from R-l to
M-l (Limited Manufacturing) to allow for a master planned
industrial park on 15.29 acres, located at the northeast
corner of Flint and Silver Streets. Resolution No. 90-30 &
Ordinance No. 889.
....
Community Development Director Gunderman highlighted this
request and advised that industrial project review will be
required at a later date.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. asking
those in favor of the project to speak. The following person
spoke:
Steve Brown, 31861 Riverside Drive, representing the
applicant, advised that they are in agreement with staff's
recommendations and offered to answer questions from Council.
Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:56 p.m.
Councilman Buck advised that he has no problems with this
project, and commented on the difficulty to develop this
property.
....
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4
TO 0 WITH WASHBURN ABSTAINING TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-57,
APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-15 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
90-30:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR OF 1990.
AND APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 89-17 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 889:
ORDINANCE NO. 889
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 15.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FLINT
AND SILVER STREETS FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-l) TO
LIMITED MANUFACTURING (M-l) (BROOKSTONE DEVELOPMENT).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
....
AYES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS: WASHBURN
PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
Findings = General ~ Amendment 89-15
~
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a
land use and allow density more in keeping with the
subject property's location, access and site
characteristics.
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent
with the surrounding land use designation.
Findinas- Zone Change 89-17
1. The present City of Lake Elsinore Zoning of R-l is
not consistent with the requested General Plan Land
Use Designation of Light Industrial as contained in
General Plan Amendment 89-15.
2. The proposed zoning, which will become effective upon
city Council approval is consistent with the General
Plan Amendment 89-15.
3. The proposed zoning will facilitate compatibility of
land uses within the City's General Plan and will
Bring the property into conformity with the General
Plan.
.....
,
34. General Plan Amendment iQ=1 i Zone Chanae 90-2 = Pentaaon
Development ~ Hunsaker i Associates.
A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from
Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential and to
change the zoning from Commercial Park (C-P) District and
Neighborhood Commercial (C-l) District to High Density Resi-
dential (R-3) District.
Mayor Washburn commented that a continuance was being
requested to May 8, 1990.
Community Development Director Gunderman confirmed this
request, and advised that a meeting was being arranged between
the residents and the applicant for some time this week.
Mayor Washburn thanked the residents for their willingness to
provide input on projects such as this.
Councilman winkler expressed concern with this project,
commenting that this is the opposite of the type of change
Council should be considering. He stressed the need for
parks in this area. He also expressed concern with the
increased traffic on Grand Avenue and the impact on traffic
circulation in the area.
~
Councilman Buck suggested that staff participate in the
proposed meeting with the developer, and include mitigation of
concerns expressed by hang glider group this evening.
Mayor Washburn appointed Councilmembers Buck and Winkler to
meet with staff, the developer and the residents.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO MAY 8, 1990.
35. General Plan Amendment 90-2 i Tentative Tract Map 24490 -
Jones i Tomich.
A request to change the General Plan designation from
PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential and to
subdivide 7.6 net acres into 35 R-l (Single-Family Residential
District) lots. The property is located approximately 2,500
feet west of the intersection of Shirley Drive and Washington
Avenue, south of Washington Avenue, east of Michigan Street
and north of the proposed Lincoln Street extension.
Resolution No. 90-31.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this request
which has a minimum lot size of 7,700 square feet.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. asking
those in favor of this plan to speak. The following person
spoke:
Larry Truman, The Keith Company, representing the applicant,
advised that they concur with staff's recommendations.
Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 8:06 p.m.
....
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO REAFFIRM E.I.R. 88-2, APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-2 AND
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-31:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR OF 1990.
AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24490 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
....
Findings = General ~ Amendment 90-2
1. The proposed Low Density Residential General Plan
designation for the site is consistent with the
surrounding land uses and will allow comparable
residential densities.
2. Planned storm drainage improvements to be funded and
implemented through the West Lake Elsinore Assessment
District will mitigate flood hazards to the site.
3. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, POlicies,
and Objectives of the General Plan.
Findinas = Tentative Tract MaD 24490
1. certified Environmental Impact Report 88-2 addressed
environmental impacts for this project. Project
impacts have been mitigated to less tan significant
levels and no environmental impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
2. The project is consistent with the Goals, Policies,
and Objectives of the General Plan.
3. The project meets the minimum R-l (Single-Family
Residential) District zoning requirements.
4. The project is consistent with surrounding land uses.
.....
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
5. As conditioned, the project will meet the City's
subdivision requirements and the State Subdivision Map
Act.
r-
Planning Division Conditions = Tentative Tract Map 24490
1. Tentative Tract Map 24490 is approved subject to the
approval of General Plan Amendment 90-2.
2. Tentative Tract Map 24490 will expire two (2) years
from date of approval unless an extension of time is
granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
3. Tentative Tract Map 24490 shall comply with the State
of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to
all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval.
4. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all
lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
5. Signage for this subdivision shall require City
Permits.
6. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site
preparation activity.
7. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved
by the Planning Division.
8. All grading shall conform to the requirements of
Section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter
70 of the Uniform Building Code.
9. Pay all applicable fees in force at time of issuance
of building permits.
10. Prior to final approval of Tract Map 24490 the
improvements specified herein and approved by the
Planning commission and the City Council shall be
installed, or the bonds and agreement for said
improvements, shall be submitted to the City, and all
other stated conditions shall be complied with.
11. Prior to Final Tract Map approval by the City Council,
all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the
minimum dimensional standards of the R-1 Zoning
District.
-
I
12. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
paYment of school mitigation fee is presented to City
Building Department.
13. All of the improvements shall be designed by
developer's civil engineer to the specifications of
the City of Lake Elsinore.
14. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County
Fire Department.
15. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
16. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer
PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
for each lot within the subdivision. No service
laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall
be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles
for submittal to the Elsinore valley Municipal Water
District(EVMWD).
17. The developer shall submit plans to Southern
California Edison for a layout of the street lighting
system. The cost of street lighting, installation
shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or
the association. Said plan shall be approved by the
City and shall be installed in accordance with the
City Standards.
18. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison
Company.
19. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas
Company.
20. Meet all requirements of General Telephone.
21. Mailboxes shall be subject to Planning Division review
and approval prior to installation.
22. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the
construction phase of this project shall be subject to
approval by the Community Development Director.
23. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of
landscape and irrigation plans for model homes (if
such are desired), back-up wall areas, street trees
and slope planting in accord with the City Landscape
Guidelines, prior to issuance of building permits. One
model shall utilize Xeriscape landscaping with
identifying signage.
24. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC &
R's shall also include screening any ground base disk
and no roof-mounted or front yard disk shall be
allowed. CC & R's shall be subject to the approval of
the Community Development Director, or his designee,
prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC &
R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any
certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed
in the future.
25. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans,
landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor
Design review approval prior to issuance of building
permits. All standards of development and procedural
steps in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal
shall apply for this project.
26. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or
any other site preparation activity will require the
appropriate City Permits. A Geotechnical Report with
associated recommendations will be required for
grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the
city's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of
the Chief Building Official and Planning Division.
Interim erosion control measures are required after 30
days of rough grading. Permanent erosion control
plantings meeting the City's Landscape Guidelines are
-
-
-
PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
I
also required. The applicant shall bond 100% for
material and labor for one (1) year for erosion
control landscaping at the time the site is rough
graded.
27. All development associated with this map requires
separate Design Review approval, in accordance with
section 17.82 of the Municipal Code prior to building
permit approval.
28. Provide the following environmental mitigation
measures:
a) All slope areas shall be planted with fire
retardant native vegetation. Native trees on site
shall be preserved wherever possible. Where trees
cannot be saved they shall be replaced by 24 inch box
trees on a 1:1 ratio and shall be of the same species
as that removed (provided they are one of the trees of
the Coastal Sage shrub community or a species listed
in the Environmental Impact Report Mitigation
Program) .
b) Architectural standards shall be implemented to
utilize building materials and site design that
minimize interior noise intrusion and provide and
exterior noise - shielded environment.
.-.
c) Should a City-wide or area-wide fee program be
adopted by the City for increase in pOlice services,
this project should be required to participate a long
with other developments.
d) Submit a Geotechnical Report and incorporate
recommendations into grading and construction plans
including building structures to withstand a 6.5
Richter scale magnitude earthquake epiSOde or other
stated maximum credible episode.
29. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department.
Enaineerinq Department Conditions
30. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with
as a condition of development as specified in the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map approval.
31. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
32. All local streets shall have 60 foot right-of-way with
40 foot curb-to-curb. Restricted local streets
(cul-de-sacs) shall have 50 foot right-of-way with a
36 foot curb-to-curb and a 3 foot utility easement on
each side.
-
33. No single-family lots shall have ingress or egress to
collector streets or higher volume traffic streets.
34. Dedicate sufficient land along Lincoln Street for a 88
foot right-of-way and 64 foot curb-to-curb (44 foot
PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
right-of-way and 32 foot curb-to-curb half street).
35. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
No. 85-26).
36. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable agency stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this
project, prior to a final map approval.
37. Construct all public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
final map approval.
38. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a civil Engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes
(Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
39. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of off-site public works improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78). All fees and requirements for
encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before
certificate of Occupancy.
40. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument
certification (with tie-notes delineated on 8-1/2: x
11" mylar) shall be submitted to Engineering
Department before final inspection of off-site
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
41. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
42. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements
on street improvement plans, as approved by the City
Engineer.
43. Lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of
drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage
easement.
44. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final
map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or
erosion downstream caused by development of site and
diversion of drainage.
45. Contribute $96.00 towards the City's Master Entryway
sign Program.
46. Prior to the Final Map recordation, a subdivision
agreement shall be entered into with the developer(s),
owner(s), and the City.
47. Applicant shall post required bonds for public works
improvements as established for the project by the
City Engineer prior to final map approval.
48. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a
-
--
-
PAGE TWENTY-THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Mello Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for
infrastructure improvements, operation and maintenance
for the West Elsinore Infrastructure Improvement
District. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued
for lots sold until the West Elsinore Improvement
District has been formed.
-
I
49. If the West Elsinore Assessment District improvements
have not been installed which will be needed for this
tract, then this developer will be required to
construct the infrastructure for circulation,
utilities and flood protection as required by the City
Engineer and Riverside County Flood Control District.
50. Applicant shall obtain necessary off-site easements
for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners
prior to final map approval.
51. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District
Standards.
52. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including
street design recommendation. Provide final Soils
Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish
grade certification.
53. All storm facilities shall provide tract and
downstream property owners with 100 year flood
protection and be approved by the City Engineer. Storm
facilities shall be designed to accommodate run-off
from a 100 year storm between right-of-way lines of
Lincoln Avenue.
r-
54. Developer shall remove the drainage swale along the
easterly tract boundary when pads are graded along the
easterly boundary. this applicant will coordinate the
construction activity and obtain necessary easements
from developer of Tract 22912.
55. Developer shall provide drainage facilities along
westerly boundary to protect lots along westerly
boundary subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
56. Northerly tract boundary shall be extended to the
centerline of Washington Avenue and 30 feet shall be
dedicated for street right-of-way.
57. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by
developer per City Standards, tapes to be provided
prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy.
36. Vestina Tentative Tract Map 25274 = Pardee Construction
Comt>any.
A request to create 109 lots on 10.6 acres located at the
northeast corner of Cottonwood Hills Road and Lost Road,
approximately 2.5 miles east of I-15 and Railroad Canyon Road,
within Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan Area.
Community Development Director Gunderman detailed this
request.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m., asking
those in favor of this map to speak. The following person
PAGE TWENTY-FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
spoke:
Ted Cullen, 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, representing
the applicant, requested that Condition #10 be removed,
because this is not appropriate for the Vesting Tentative
Tract Map laws.
Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 8:10 p.m.
City Attorney Harper confirmed that Mr. Cullen's comment with
regard to Condition #10 is accurate.
Councilman Buck questioned the lot sizes and configurations.
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that changes
will be occurring with both factors, and further that design
issues may also change at a later date.
~
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25274 BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL WITH THE DELETION OF CONDITION #10.
Findings
1. Subject to the Cottonwood Hills Environmental Impact
Report the proposed project has anticipated and
mitigated any significant adverse environmental
impacts.
2. This project, as approved, complies with the Goals,
and Objectives of the General Plan and the High
Density Residential Zoning District as defined in the
Cottonwood Specific Plan.
-
3. This project, as conditioned, complies with the design
directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section
17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the property in accordance with
the Objectives of Chapter 17.82.060 and the Planning
District in which it is located.
5. The project, as conditioned, complies with the
Objectives and Standards of the City'S Subdivision
Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act.
6. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed.
7. As conditioned, there will be no conflicts with
identified public easements.
Planninq Division Conditions:
1. Tentative Tract Map 25274 will expire two (2) years
from date of approval unless an extension of time is
granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Tentative Tract Map 25274 shall comply with the
State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall
-
PAGE TWENTY-FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
r-
comply to all applicable requirements of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by
the Conditions of Approval.
3. Project shall comply with all Conditions of Approval
of Tract 23848, contained herein.
4. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all
lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
5. Signage for this subdivision shall require City
Permits.
6. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site
preparation activity.
7. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved
by the Planning Division.
8. All grading shall conform to the requirements of
section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter
70 of the Uniform Building Code.
9. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and
grading for subject development as required by City
Engineer and Chief Building Official.
a) Bonding shall be done by phases and not by final
map(s) for grading.
b) Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other
improvements.
10. DELETED.
11. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
paYment of school mitigation fee is presented to City
Building Department.
12. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County
Fire Department.
a) Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire
hydrants (6"x4"x2-l/2"), located at each street
intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in
any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage
more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow
shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
--
b) Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the
water system plans to the Fire Department for review.
Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer,
containing a Fire Department approval signature block,
and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing
and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the
local water company, the originals shall be presented
to the Fire Department for signature.
c) The required water system, including fire hydrants,
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate
water agency prior to any combustible building
material being placed on an individual lot.
d) All access islands shall have a minimum setback
from curb of 35 feet.
PAGE TWENTY-SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
e) When islands exist, the minimum width on each side
of roadway shall be 16 feet.
f) "No Parking" fire lanes shall be designated on all
private drives within project, due to width of drives.
g) Recreation facilities "A", "B" and "c" shall be
conditioned separate from the rest of the project.
h) The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire
Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file
with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any
building constructed on lots created by this land
division shall comply with the special construction
provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance
546.
--
i) All buildings shall be constructed with fire
retardant roofing material as described in Section
3202 of the Uniform Building Code.
j) Prior to final inspection of any building, the
applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating
required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting
and/or signs.
13. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
a) This project is in the 1750 pressure zone with a
maximum serviceable pad elevation of 1630.
b) Refer to the Water and Sewer Master Plan prepared
for Cottonwood Canyon by NBS Lowry at 17748 Skypark
CirCle, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92714, (714)
261-7086.
.....
c) Pay all outstanding preliminary project cost
incurred.
d) All construction grading water is to be taken from
Canyon Lake. The location of pumps will be reviewed
and approved by EVMWD Temesca1 Division.
e) Per Resolution No. 966, EVMWD will be governing the
availability and provisions of construction water for
this project.
f) Recreation facility "A" shall require a meter with
a reduced pressure principal backf10w device, a grease
trap and sample box, a fire detector check if
structure is to be sprink1ered and all necessary
infrastructure.
q) Pay sewer line reimbursement if Railroad Canyon
sewer is constructed by others.
h) Design and construct the 36 inch Trunk Sewer Line
in Railroad canyon as shown in the District Master
Plan.
.....
i) The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
anticipates providing sanitary sewer service for the
above references property based upon the completion of
the 1 mgd expansion of the Regional Wastewater
PAGE TWENTY-SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
-
Reclamation Plant. It is estimated that an additional
1 mgd sewage treatment capacity will be available by
July 1990. EVMWD has also programmed additional
expansion of the treatment plant by currently
preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
next phase of construction. BY this condition of
service the District expresses no warranties as to the
availability of sewer service for the above referenced
property of such time as applications for sewer
service to the property are accepted or approved.
j) For facilities in private driveways submit an EVMWD
Grant of Easement Form for minimum 20 foot easements
with a legal description and a plat map.
k) No combustible materials shall be placed on the
project until the ultimate backbone facilities have
been constructed and approved by EVMWD for each
pressure zone.
-
14. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting
District is required prior to approval of a Final
Tract Map.
15. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of
landscape and irrigation plans for model homes (if
such are desired), baCk-Up wall areas, street trees
and slope planting in accord with the City Landscape
Guidelines, prior to issuance of building permits.
16. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC &
R's shall also include screening any ground base disk
and no roof-mounted or front yard disk shall be
allowed. CC & R's shall be subject tot the approval of
the Community Development Director, or his designee,
prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC &
R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any
Certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed
in the future.
17. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans,
landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor
Design Review approval prior to issuance of building
permits. All standards of development and procedural
steps in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal
shall apply for this project.
18. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are
required, and plans shall be approved prior to grading
permit issuance. The applicant shall bond 100% for
material and labor for one (1) year for erosion
control landscaping prior to the issuance of a rough
grade permit.
19. Upon issuance of grading permits, an interim
mitigation fee shall be paid to the City to mitigate
impacts on the Stephens' kangaroo rat. Said fee shall
be in amount as set forth in the City's Mitigation Fee
Ordinance No. 869.
20. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete and
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
PAGE TWENTY-EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Department.
Enqineering Department Conditions
21. Tentative Tract Map 25274 is Lot 668 of Tentative
Tract Map 23848 (Cottonwood Hills), and is Cottonwood
Hills Phase 1 development. Tentative Tract Map 25274
shall be subject to all applicable Conditions of
Approval of Tentative Tract Map 23848.
22. All infrastructure improvements of Tract Map 25274
shall be constructed in coordination with the
development phasing of Tract 23848 and subject to the
approval of the City Engineer.
23. Lost Road northeast of Cottonwood Hills Road shall be
in tract 25274 boundary.
24. Storm drains in private roads shall be maintained by a
homeowners association.
25. Applicant shall pay $270 towards the City Entry Sign
Program.
26. Private roads must be approved by County Fire
Department as to width, curve radii and turn arounds.
27. All off-site street right-of-way for access to this
tract to maintained public right-of-way shall be
offered for dedication to the City prior to or
concurrent with final map.
Planning Division Conditions = Tract Map 23848
(See Condition #21)
1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 23848 approval shall be
subject to the approval of Annexation #44 by the Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 23848 shall expire two (2)
years from date of approval unless extended pursuant
to State and Local Law or recordation of final map
occurs.
3. Applicant shall comply with development standards as
outlined in the approved Specific Plan and/or City
Codes.
4. Final plotting and architectural drawings shall
require Minor Design Review prior to each Final Map
approval.
5. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior
to the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy and
release of utilities.
6. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or
building permits, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall
return the executed original to the Community
Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
7. Prior to the issuance of grading permits a landscape
and irrigation plan shall be subject to the City
Landscape Guidelines, April 1988, and include slope
planting and street tree standards.
-
-
--
PAGE TWENTY-NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
~
8. Developer shall incorporate mitigation for isolated
Oak tree removal throughout the site into the
Cottonwood Creek Revegetation Program. Such mitigation
shall occur on a 10:1 replacement ratio after
individual trees have been evaluated for preservation
feasibility by the City in consultation with the
developer. This program shall be complied with prior
to final map approval or grading permit (whichever
occurs first) and which shall take precedence
requiring revisions to the map to comply with the
program if necessary. 10:1 replacement of the Oak
trees that are removed according to the Tree Survey
shall be required subject to the following standards:
a) Trees shall be replaced according to the species
removed.
b) Trees shall be replanted within the riparian and
floodplain areas.
c) Shall be 24 inch box trees.
~
d) Provided with a temporary irrigation system for at
least two (2) years.
e) Submit this revegetation plan to be approved by the
City prior to issuance of grading permits.
f) All landscape improvements to be bonded 120%,
Faithful Performance Bond, and released at completion
of installation of landscape requirement
approval/acceptance, and bond 100% for material and
labor for one year.
Applicant shall record CC & R's for the tract
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers, and trucks over one-ton capacity, roof
mounted or front yard microwave satellite antennas.
The CC & R's shall be approved by the Community
Development Director prior to recordation of final
map.
Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed
three-feet (3') in height, in the required setback
area as required by current Zoning Code with the
exception of wrought iron fences which may be
five-feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be
prohibited.
11. Decorative block wall or open steel fencing (as
specified in the Specific plan sections 3.2 and 3.3)
shall be required for side yards which have street
frontage. A six-foot (6'0") high solid wood fence or
masonry wall, or open steel fence shall be constructed
along the side and rear property lines (as specified
in the Specific Plan sections 3.2 and 3.3). Applicant
shall submit a typical fencing plan, showing the
heiqht and material, and the fence locations indicated
on a grading plan and be approved by the Community
Development Director prior to the release of the first
Certificate of Occupancy.
9.
.....
10.
12. All signage related to Tract 23848 shall have the
required City permits.
13. Landscape screening shall be provided where parking
PAGE THIRTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
lots are included in model home complexes. At least
one (1) model home will incorporate water conserving
landscape design principles. A landscape and fencing
plan for the model homes shall be provided at time of
Minor Design Review.
14. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Riverside
County Fire Department for fire protection.
15. Applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District.
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall
provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake
Elsinore Unified School District have been paid.
17. Applicant shall pay capital improvement fees, if
applicable, prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
18. The Vesting Tentative Map is a "phased" Tentative Map.
Individual finals maps may be recorded on separate
units without regard to the unit numbering sequence
indicated on the map so long as the sequence of
providing for adequate public facilities for each
phase is based on the approval of the Director of
Public Services.
19. Upon issuance of grading permits, an interim
mitigation fee shall be paid to the City to mitigate
impacts on the Stephens' Kangaroo rat. Said fee shall
be in an amount as set forth in the City's Mitigation
Fee Ordinance (Ordinance No. 859).
20. A Cultural Resources Survey of affected areas related
to Railroad Canyon Road shall be evaluated and
approved by the City prior to project grading.
Presence of an archaeologist or paleontologist for
on-site evaluation and full mitigation is required
should any resource be uncovered during construction.
21. The developer shall comply with a Cultural Resources
Mitigation Program which shall be incorporated as a
condition of the Phase I tentative tract map approval
and shall be complied with prior to final map approval
or grading permit (Whichever occurs first) and which
shall take precedence, requiring revisions to the map
to comply with the program if necessary. The program
shall be based on site evaluations by qualified
archaeologists and historians to establish
significance of each site and a detailed plan for
appropriate mitigation, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
22. Compensation for disturbances to cultural resources
shall be provided by a program to recover information
from sites that cannot be preserved. Initial clearing
operations for grading shall be monitored by
archaeologists where required by the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR). In the event significant historic
material is discovered, it shall be removed before
grading occurs.
23. All structures shall be designed to incorporate all
state and local water conservation regulations,
subject to the approval of the Chief Building
Official.
~
.....,
. -
PAGE THIRTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
-
24. All site planning shall incorporate measures to
promote waste reduction and recycling to the extent
feasible, subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director.
25. Grading and construction plans shall incorporate the
measures listed in the EIR to reduce and control
erosion potential, subject to the approval of the
Chief Building Official.
26. Library fees shall be paid prior to issuance of
building permits in accordance with the City's Library
Impact Program.
27. A Fire Protection Impact Mitigation Program shall be
reviewed in consultation with Riverside County Fire
Department subject to approval by the Community
Development Director prior to approval of First Final
Map, which shall include:
a) Participation in the establishment of a funding
program for the southeast area fire station and a
mechanism for its timely delivery concurrent with
demand for services imposed by this project.
b) Wildland interface design and management as
conveyed in the Specific Plan and other measures
required to appropriately reduce fire hazard. This
program shall be reviewed and approved by both the
City and County.
-
28. The Vesting Tentative Map shall include provisions for
a Multi-use Trail Corridor through the Cottonwood
Creek Corridor with Lot "L". Such Corridor shall be
established along a topographically accepted route to
the satisfaction of the Director of community Services
prior to approval of the First Final Map. provision of
a trail corridor does not imply construction or right
to use until such time as a trail program is
implemented.
29. Improvement plans, including sewer, water and drainage
shall be approved prior to the Final Map approval.
30. Turn-key public parks shall be provided for Cottonwood
Hills as follows:
-
Developer shall dedicate the land (infrastructure) and
rough grading for one (1) 5.0 acre neighborhood park,
designated on the tentative map as Lot 669. This
dedication shall occur concurrently with recordation
of adjoining final maps for either Phase 4, 6 or 9 ,
whichever comes first or at a later time if mutually
agreed upon by the city and applicant. In addition,
the developer shall provide turn-key park improvements
for this park in accordance with a conceptual park
development plan to be prepared by the developer and
approved by the Community Services Director prior to
the recordation of the First Final Map. Said
improvements plus the design costs shall be limited to
a maximum expenditure by the developer of $450,000
(1989 dollars). The above mentioned items will be
completed no later than the certificate of Occupancy
of the 300th unit within the entire development.
31. The applicant shall meet the following conditions
regarding fire protection:
PAGE THIRTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
a) All water mains and fire hydrants providing
required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance
with the appropriate sections of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460 and/or 546, subject to the approval
by the Riverside County Fire Department.
b) All buildings shall be constructed with fire
retardant roofing materials as described in section
3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles
or shakes shall have a Class "A" rating and shall be
approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
32. Prior to approval of the First Final Map, the project
site shall be annexed to and pay applicable fees to
the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
33. The dimensions of all residential lots shown on the
Final Tract Map shall comply with the minimum
standards established in the Specific Plan.
34. Street names for all streets within the Vesting
Tentative Map shall be approved by the Community
Development Director.
35. Subdivider shall forward all information pertaining to
the Residential Monitoring Program to the Community
Development Director prior to Final Map approval of
all or any portion of this Vesting Tentative Map.
36. Grading plans for this subdivision shall comply with
the grading objectives and guidelines established in
the Specific Plan.
Enqineering DeDartment
37. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with
as a condition of development as specified in the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building permit
is issued.
38. Dedicate underground water rights to the City, if said
rights are owned by Pardee (Municipal Code, Title 16,
Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be obtained from the
Engineering Department.
39. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 15, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
No. 85-26) .
40. Submit a letter of verification "will-serve" letter to
the City Engineering Department, from the applicable
water district, stating water and sewer arrangements
have been made for this project prior to final map
approval.
41. Construct all off-site public works improvements per
approved plans (Municipal Code, Title 12); plans must
be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
final map approval.
42. Street and storm drain improvement plans and
specifications shall by prepared by a civil engineer
and improvements shall be to Riverside County
standards and City Codes (L.E.M.C. 16.34 and 12.04).
43. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
-
-
-
PAGE THIRTY-THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of public works off-site improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78).
----
44. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire protection.
45. Provide street lighting and indicate on street
improvement plans as required by the City Engineer.
46. Annex to the City Landscaping and Street Lighting
District.
..-..
47. Enter into a subdivision agreement for construction of
public improvements and post appropriate bonds.
48. All local interior streets shall be 60 foot
right-of-way with 40 foot curb-to-curb. Restricted
local streets shall not be less than 50 foot
right-of-way with 36 foot curb-to-curb.
49. A complete hydrology and hydraulic report shall be
submitted and approved by the City Engineer and
Riverside County Flood Control District prior to the
First Final Map approval.
50. The final map shall indicate and provide for the base
flood (lOO-year flood) within the existing channel and
related facilities of the San Jacinto River and
Cottonwood Creek. All other flood areas shall be
provided with facilities to convey waters to these
channels which shall be required to be implemented
concurrent with construction of related phase subject
to the approval of the Community Development Director
and the City Engineer Prior to Final Map approval.
51. Conceptual improvement plan necessary to mitigate the
impacts if increased storm run-off shall be provided
by the developer as determined by the City prior to
Final Map approvals.
52. Any natural drainage diverted or concentrated onto
adjacent property will require a letter of drainage
acceptance from the affected property owner prior to
Final Map approval.
53. Any grading on adjacent property will require a
grading or slope easement from the affected property
owner.
,---
54. A program shall be implemented for the construction of
Railroad Canyon Road from I-15 to the north project
boundary. The program shall be subject to approval of
the Community Development Director and the City
Engineer. The program shall provide for the funding
and start of construction of Phase I of Railroad
Canyon Road prior to issuance of the first building
permit; and further that the road construction shall
be completed prior to the 501st Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
Phase I of Railroad Canyon Road shall consist of a
minimum of 102 feet of right-of-way, with full width
grading and four (4) lanes of pavement, of which at
least two (2) lanes must be reopened to traffic prior
PAGE THIRTY-FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
to occupying the 50lst unit. In the event that two
lanes of Railroad Canyon Road cannot be reopened prior
to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy,
Pardee shall agree to pave Cottonwood Hills Road
on-site for temporary ingress and egress.
The City will make its best efforts to create a
benefit district or similar program for Railroad
Canyon Road which provides for an equitable sharing of
costs between all properties within the City accessing --
the road. The final design and ultimate improvements
of Railroad Canyon Road shall be approved by the City
Engineer and Community Development Director prior to
City Council approval of the First Final Map.
55. The developer's financial contribution to Railroad
Canyon Road, Cottonwood Hills Road, Lost Road, and
Holland Road, both on-site and off-site, shall not
exceed that amount required by the city's proposed
Transportation Mitigation Fee Program except that the
developer in any event shall fully construct said road
improvements within the Vesting Tentative Map
boundaries and participate in the Railroad Canyon Road
Benefit District as determined by the City Engineer.
56. Cottonwood Hills Road shall not be less than a 100
foot right-of-way with 76 foot curb-to-curb and a 14
foot raised landscaped median.
57. No single-family lots shall front collector streets or
higher volume streets.
58. Interior streets shall be designed with nine percent
(9%) as the desired grade and intersecting streets,
where possible, shall meet at a maximum grade of six --
percent (6%).
59. Existing street alignments not used shall be abandoned
prior to final map approval, excepting Railroad Canyon
Road.
60. Cottonwood Hills Road, east of the Vesting Tentative
Map boundary, shall be realigned as an unimproved
graded roadway to connect to existing Holland Road to
the east in an alignment satisfactory to the City
Engineer. Cottonwood Hills graded road-way shall be
re-evaluated as each phase is constructed as to what
level of improvement is needed as traffic demands
increase, as determined by the City Engineer.
61. Lost Road shall be an 88 foot right-of-way with 64
foot curb-to-curb.
62. A traffic signal shall be installed and be operational
at the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and
Cottonwood Hills Road prior to issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy.
63. All utility easements and access roads required by
utility agencies shall be secured by the utility
agency by separate instrument or accepted on the final
map prior to City approval of the final map.
64. Designated natural open space lots (Lots K, L, and M)
shall be dedicated to the city. operation and
maintenance of open space habitat shall be provided
....
PAGE THIRTY-FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
through the City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and
Lighting Maintenance District or a similar entity. The
City may require that an appropriate strip of land
along the boundary of residential lots (consistent
with the Fire Management Program set forth in the
Specific Plan Table 6.2) be maintained by a homeowners
association.
".,.....
65. A development agreement between the deve1oper(s) of
Cottonwood Hills and the City of Lake Elsinore shall
be prepared and approved prior to recordation of the
First Final Map. This agreement should specify the
respective obligations of the City and developer in
regard to the financing, phasing, provision and
operation of public facilities and services.
66. The applicant shall contribute $2475 for the City's
Master Entry Sign Program.
-
67. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument
certifications (with tie-notes delineated on 8-1/2" x
11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department before final inspection of off-site
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
68. Access to Railroad Canyon Road from lots fronting
Railroad Canyon Road shall be limited and will be
limited to right-turn in and right-turn out only.
69. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by
developer per City standards, tapes to be provided
prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
37. Briahton/Alberhill Ranch Develo~ment Agreement.
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that staff is
recommending continuance to the meeting of May 22, 1990.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CONTINUE THIS AGREEMENT TO MAY 22, 1990.
..--
38. Pardee-Grossman/Cottonwood Canyon Development Aareement.
community Development Director Gunderman advised that the
proposed agreement requested by the applicant, encompasses the
cottonwood Specific Plan Area. He detailed the agreement and
some specific concerns relating to development fees, term of
the agreement, and development of the neighborhood park.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. asking
those in favor of the proposed agreement to speak. The
following person spoke:
Mike Magee, representing Pardee, advised that this is the
culmination of many months of work. He clarified the
differences between infrastructure and service fees,
explaining that the infrastructure fees they are requesting be
waived are those for which they will have already provided.
He also explained that this agreement will assist them in
Obtaining the necessary financing to proceed. He offered to
answer any questions from council.
Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 8:21 p.m.
PAGE THIRTY-SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Mayor Washburn expressed concern with the 20 year term
proposed by the agreement, recommending the 15 year period
previously discussed. He also requested clarification and
tightening up of language on page 27 of the agreement relating
to Mello Roos financing. City Attorney Harper suggested that
the Mello Roos language be stricken, as it should be a stand
alone Mello Roos situation.
Mr. Magee commented that the City is moving toward a Marks
Roos Pool financing mechanism and they would hate to be in a
non-competitive situation. Extensive Council discussion
ensued with regard to financing mechanisms.
Masood Sohaili, O'Melveny & Meyers, representing the
applicant, advised that Pardee is willing to work with the
Council, but would prefer not to participate in a plan other
developers are not required to participate in similarly.
City Attorney Harper expressed concern with the potential of
future changes to the Mello-Roos laws, and reminded everyone
that those could change many times in the 20 year period of
the agreement.
Mayor Washburn expressed concern with invalidation of the
agreement on a technicality, or improper language.
City Attorney Harper stated for clarification that an
appropriate statement of policy would be "It is the policy of
the City to require that (not just Mello Roos), but all
financing issued by the City of Lake Elsinore and the
Redevelopment Agency be placed in the Marks Roos Pool".
Councilman Buck commented that the agreement should state that
there is a $2,000 development fee, but explain the $1,000
credit has been given.
Mayor Washburn questioned the new fee waiver and how it would
impact new fees. Mr. Magee further clarified the proposed
waiver of future infrastructure fees vs. future service fees.
Mayor Washburn questioned the time frame for project buildout.
Mr. Magee advised that in the current market, their projection
would be 18-20 years.
Mayor Washburn read the following change to Page 27 of the
Agreement provided by the City Attorney:
"In addition, the City shall not require the developer to join
the existing Mello Roos Districts or require that financing
districts participate in any pooled financing program or bond
issuance sponsored directly or indirectly by the City, unless
at the time of the issuance of bonds a formal policy provides
that all developments for which the City is sponsoring Mello
Roos Districts shall be required to participate in such
financing program. Unless developer otherwise consents, in
the event that developer is required to participate in pooled
financing or Marks-Roos Program".
--'"
.....,
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED
AGREEMENT WITH THE CHANGE TO PAGE 27, AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 891: ~.
ORDINANCE NO. 891
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH
PARDEE-GROSSMAN/COTTONWOOD CANYON.
PAGE THIRTY-SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24
,
1990
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
---- ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
39. Ramsaate Specific Plan Development Agreement.
Community Development Director Gunderman advised that staff is
recommending continuance to the meeting of May 22, 1990.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CONTINUE THIS AGREEMENT TO MAY 22, 1990.
,....
40. Northwest Sewer proiect Assessment District 86-1.
Public Services Director Kirchner detailed the location of the
proposed district. City Attorney Harper explained the
procedure for this public hearing.
Steve Hassett, 10920 Via Frontera, San Diego, representing NBS
Lowrey, detailed project and financing costs for the proposed
district. He also detailed and explained written protests
received from Ranel Development, Aero Pro Manufacturing and
Dura Construction and a verbal protest from Mr. Lawrence
McLingberg. He advised that the protests represented 46.95
acres or 15.2% of the property included in the district; the
total proposed acreage is 309.43 acres.
Hector Carrillo, design engineer for NBS Lowrey, explained the
increased costs due to the type of pump station required for
the project, and increased linear sewer footage.
The City Clerk reported no additional written comments.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. asking
those interested in this project to speak. The following
people spoke:
Steve Brown, Brookstone Development, advised that his company
represents approximately 80 acres within the district and that
he was one of the original participants in the proposal. He
expressed concern with the high cost being proposed for the
pump stations, and recommended a meeting with the water
district to review the specifications for the project.
Tom Bensfield, Colich Construction, advised that they
understand the concerns with the overall cost and advised that
they are willing to work with the water district and the City
to review the specifications.
Mike Hilstrom, advised that he is in favor of the district,
but expressed concern with lines which run under the freeway
to the new high school site and whether costs would be passed
on to the school district for this project. Steve Hassett
explained that the lines mentioned were installed as part of
the school districts costs, but as pUblic property the high
school cannot be assessed under the district.
~
Don Downer, 18301 COllier, expressed concern with the costs of
the pump station and questioned the inclusion of the future
Alberhill developments in the assessment district. Steve
PAGE THIRTY-EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Hassett advised that Alberhill will be participating in the
costs to oversize the lines and lift station, in a cash
contribution to the district.
Lawrence McLingberg, 18181 Collier, expressed concern that the
property proposed for the district will be worked on by t~e
redevelopment agency, will allow a sewer line to cross prlvate
property, and will alter the elevations of , private property.
Hector Carrillo advised that the lift statlon has been
designed to be at the grade of ultimate development.
John Rainsford, representing Rancho Santa Fe, explained his
background and questioned the inclusion of his three 5 acre
parcels in the district, due to the limitations which have
already been on his property for the last 6 or 7 years. He
further explained that 7 of 10 acres are not buildable, and he
felt the two parcels of which is acreage is a part should be
deleted from the district. Steve Hassett clarified the
configuration of the district. Mr. Rainsford further
inquired what the impact of the proposed flood control channel
would be. Hector Carrillo advised that their plan has not yet
been set.
Len Vierra, Rancon Realty IV, advised that they are in support
of the sewer district, but concerned with the costs and its
allocation to the property owners. He suggested that this item
be delayed for two weeks to allow for a meeting with the water
district. He further suggested that the school be required to
pay a portion of the costs, and explained the improvements his
company will be providing.
Dennis Spar, Dura Construction, advised that his main concern
is with the dollar figures in the spread of assessments. He
also expressed concern with the inclusion of Zone 2 in the
district, in that he feels no benefit will be realized by that
area. Steve Hassett clarified that Mr. Spar was the property
owner whose assessment had been reduced after his
correspondence was investigated, due to the flood control
footage included.
Don Daniel, 1150 Chestnut, Escondido, commented on discussions
with Mr. Kirchner and NBS Lowrey, and questioned the cash
discount figures. Steve Hassett advised that the bills will
be mailed on April 26 and the payment of cash will cut-out the
2-1/4% financing costs.
Gary Sepillone, 17880 Strickland, questioned the map of the
district, and questioned the ability of the existing sewage
plant to hold the capacity increase from this district. Staff
confirmed that it is capable.
John Friedman, Long Beach Equities, advised that his company
has agreed to pay for the oversizing as mentioned by Mr.
Hassett, but expressed concern with the award of contract
subject to later amendment. He felt a 30% discrepancy for
costs is too much, and questioned the ability to phase the
district. He also recommended continuance or some other
mechanism to delay this project.
Further discussion continued with regard to costs, the
possibility of altering the project after the contract has
been awarded and the potential for rebidding the project.
Larry Hasty, questioned the bid process and the time frame for
development of bids; he expressed concern that the best
possible bid may not have been received.
Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 10:01 p.m.
....
....,
-
PAGE THIRTY-NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Councilman Buck suggested that the project be re-bid.
~
Councilman Winkler expressed concern that the answers have not
satisfied the concerns of the property owners.
Councilman Starkey also suggested redesign and re-bid of the
work.
Councilman Dominguez commented that time is needed to review
the concerns.
Mayor Washburn expressed concern with delay of the project.
City Attorney Harper advised that redesign could take up to 45
days, but a 2 week delay might provide more answers.
Steve Brown expressed concern with a 5 month delay of this
project, in that his project will be completed in July and
without sewer, the property will be unable to be signed off
and leased. He requested that Council delay for two weeks to
review the alternatives.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM FOR TWO WEEKS.
41. Abandonment ~ 89-3.
Abandonment of Dawes Street - Resolution No. 90-40.
Public Services Director advised that this an abandonment
related to Item #31 on this agenda.
.....
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 10:12 p.m., asking
those in favor of this item to speak. No one spoke. Mayor
Washburn asked those in opposition to speak. Hearing no one,
the public hearing was closed at 10:12 p.m.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE ABANDONMENT NO. 89-3 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-40:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT A STREET EASEMENT (PORTION OF
DAWES STREET) IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC
USE AND VACATING SAID EASEMENT.
42. Abandonment No. 90-1.
~
Abandonment of a portion of Grape Street, Northeast of
Railroad Canyon Road - Resolution No. 90-41.
Public Services Director Kirchner advised that this
abandonment is related to an adjacent commercial development
and is actually a trade for a similar piece of right of way.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the pUblic hearing at 10:13 p.m., asking
those in favor of Abandonment No. 90-1 to speak. No one
spoke. Mayor Washburn asked those in opposition to speak.
Hearing no one the public hearing was closed at 10:14 p.m.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE ABANDONMENT NO. 90-1 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 90-41:
PAGE FORTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 90-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT A STREET EASEMENT (PORTION OF
GRAPE STREET) IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC
USE AND VACATING SAID EASEMENT.
43. Hearing Q! Protests to Notices to destroy weeds. remove
rubbish refuse ~ dirt.
...
Community Development Director Gunderman explained the process
for this program and advised that property owners have until
May 21st to clear their property or the City's contractor will
proceed.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 10:15 p.m., asking
those wishing to speak on this matter to do so. The following
person spoke:
Maria Keefer, 8803 Tweeter Lane, Downey, expressed concern
with last year's billing for her property at Riverside and
Gunnerson.
Mayor Washburn directed Mr. Gunderman to meet with Ms. Keefer
to address her concerns.
Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 10:18 p.m.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE ABATEMENT OF ALL LOTS NOT
ABATED BY THE OWNER BY MAY 21, 1990.
BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
-
51. Memorial = Yarborough Park.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO REFER THIS ITEM TO THE COUNCIL PARK COMMITTEE TO RESOLVE
PENDING CONCERNS.
BUSINESS ITEMS
52. Second Reading = Ordinance No. 884.
Relating to ManUfacturing District Parking Requirements.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 884:
ORDINANCE NO. 884
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTIONS 17.56.020, 17.60.020 AND SECTION 17.66.030.C
OF CHAPTERS 56, 60 AND 66 OF TITLE 17 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE
MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR APPLICATIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY
REDUCTIONS IN MANUFACTURING DISTRICT PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
-
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
,.
PAGE FORTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
53. Second Readinq = Ordinance No. 885.
Relating to Zone Change 90-1.
,....
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 885:
ORDINANCE NO. 885
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING 34.14 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF GRAND AVENUE, 1,000 FEET
EAST OF ORTEGA HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SANGSTON DRIVE FROM C-l
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), R-3 (PUD) AND R-l HILLSIDE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (HPD) (PUD) TO R-l (HPD), (MACLEOD
DEVELOPMENT - ZONE CHANGE 90-1).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
54. Second Reading = Ordinance ~ 886.
-
Relating to the Ramsgate Specific Plan.
Councilmember Winkler requested correction of the Ordinance to
reflect his abstention at the last meeting.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY STARKEY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 886:
ORDINANCE NO. 886
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE
RAMS GATE DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT
THERETO.
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
WINKLER
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk read a letter to the City from the Downtown
Business Association thanking the City for the improvements to
Main Street near the I-15 freeway.
,.....
~ COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Winkler commented on the community's acceptance of
the lighting and landscaping districts, and expressed concern with
the fact that City residents are being put on waiting lists to
participate in Little League and other organized activities. He
suggested that staff pursue means by which to give City residents
priority for use of City parks, as well as the imposition of fees
on County residents using City parks.
PAGE FORTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
Councilmember Dominguez expressed concern with trash problems in
the downtown area, and suggested that staff meet with Rodriguez to
consider a transfer station in the City. He also requested that
staff review placement of some of the old play equipment back at
city park; and suggested that the asphalt area be slurry sealed.
Councilmember Dominguez also requested that the potential of a
stop Sign on Lakeshore near the fishing area at Chaney (Townsend)
to making crossing Lakeshore safer. He requested a staff report
on this signal at the next meeting.
councilman Starkey commented on the success of the Industrial Fair
sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce and commended them for a jOb
well done.
...
Committee ADDointments.
Mayor Washburn announced the following Council Committee
appointments:
Western Riverside Coalition Q! Governments
Jim Winkler, Chairman
Gary Washburn, Member
Council Finance Committee
Gary Washburn, Chairman
will Buck, Member
Lake Elsinore Management Authority
will Buck, Chairman
Bill starkey, Member
Council Park Committee
---
Jim Winkler, Chairman
will Buck, Member
Interqovernmental Committee
Jim Winkler, Chairman
Bill Starkey, Member
Public Works Committee
Fred Dominguez, Chairman
will Buck, Member
Nuisance Abatement
Fred Dominguez, Chairman
Gary Washburn, Member
Downtown Business Association
Gary Washburn, Chairman
Fred Dominguez, Member
Central Business District
Will Buck, Chairman
Fred Dominguez
....
CLOSED SESSION
None.
PAGE FORTY-THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 1990
~
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR C~ COUN~L~~ P.M.
GAR~ WASHBURN, MAYOR
CI;i~F LAKE ELSINORE
ntsrJLj
~SAD' CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
-
-