HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-28-1991 City Council MinutesMINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
545 CHANEY STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAYi MAY 28r 1991
, . i
i,
~-~_.~..'
**~**~~****************~~******~***********~**********************
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Washburn at 7:O1 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Manager Molendyk.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director
Boone, Community Services Director Watenpaugh, Public Services
Director Basham and City Clerk Kasad.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan Drive, commented on upcoming consideration
of Residential Projects 89-18 and 91-2 adjacent to Highway 74. He
suggested potential future alignments for Highway 74 which would
allow for the ultimate 110' right-of-way. Mayor Washburn
commented that the suggestions had been noted by the Engineering
Department representatives and would be reviewed. (F:138.2)
Marge Rieder, 300 N. Ellis Street, advised that she is a resident
of the Briarwood Mobile Home Park. She £urther advised that the
park has recently changed hands and the residents have been
notified that it will become a family park as of July 1, 1991.
She expressed concern with the potential related drug and crime
problems and presented a petition from the residents of the park
requesting assistance from the City Council. (F:124.1)
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
A, Presentation - Countv Growth Manaaement Vision Statement =
A.~. Wilson, Executive Director, Western Riverside Council of
Governmen~s. (F:140.13)
A.J. Wilson invited the City Council to attend the Council of
Governments Annual Meeting on Monday, June 3rd, and advised
that Councilman Winkler has been nominated for next year's
Chairman of the Council.
~r
.
,i
Mr. Wilson then detailed the history of the Western Riverside
Council of .GOVernments and explained the reasoning at the time
it"was organized. He also explained the task force which was
formed to develop the organization's "Mission Statement", and
commended City Manager Molendyk for his work on this project.
He hiqhlighted the Mission Statement and requested ~hat
Council provide any comments or input at their earliest
convenience.
PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28~ 1991
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further discussion and consideration:
Item No. 7.
MOVED,BY WINKLER; SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. City Council Meeting - May 14, 1991. (F:44.4)
The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
b. Planning Commission Meeting - April 17, 1991. (F:60.3)
c. Planning Commission Meeting - May 1, 1991. (F:60.3)
2. Received and ordered filed the L.E.A.F. Animal Control
Activity Report for April, 1991. (F:18.2)
3. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for April,
1991. (F:12.5)
4. Ratified Warrant List for May 15, 1991. (F:12.3)
5. Adopted Resolution Nos. 91-39 thru 91-41, relating to the
City-wide Lighting & Landscaping District. (F:22.2)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, COST ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT AND '
REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR ~
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY AFTER FORMATION OF A
DISTRICT.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT" FOR ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR IN A
DISTRICT WITAIN SAID CITY.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
CERTAIN MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF DECISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
6
Adopted Resolution No. 91-42 setting the Commercial Industrial
Park Mitigation Fee. (F:114.1)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-42, i
A RESOLUTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ~
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY AMENDING SECTION 4 OF RESOLUTION
NO. 89.44, ADOPTED ON AUGUST 29, 1989, THE PARK CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE N0. 572, REQUIRING THE
DEDICATION OF LAND/OR THE PAYMENT OF FEES FOR THE
ESTABLISH~ENT OF PAR~ ~ND REC~~ATION FA~ZL~TIES IN THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE.
PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
8. Adopted Council Policy relating to Annexation Procedures.
(F:20.1)
9. Approved Final Tract Map 24624-2 for Centex Homes; authorized
the City Clerk to sign the map for recordation and accepted
dedication of Underground Water Rights for recordation with
the final map. (F:160.2)
10. Accepted Dedication for Street Right-of-Way on San Jacinto
; Drive and Water Rights for Commercial Project 89-1. (F:132.1)
11. Accepted Grant Deed for Property Adjacent to Robb Road for the
Lakeshore/Robb Road Intersection Improvement Project.
(F:132.1)
12. Approved public hearing of June 11, 1991, for the following:
a. Brighton/Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. l;
General Plan Amendment 91-1; Zoning iegulations and
Amendment No. 1 to the Development Aqreement with Brighton
Alberhill Associates. (F:150.2)
ITEM PULLED FROM TIiE CONSENT CALENDAR
7. Business License Application _ Ice Cream Vendor. (F:34.1)
City Manager Molendyk advised that pursuant to Council
requests, staff is in the process of contacting references for
the vendor, however, these contacts have not been completed.
He recommended if Council chooses to approve the application,
they do so contingent upon follow-up reference checking.
Councilman Starkey commented that he is in favor of the hours
this vendor intends to operate. He also commented on the
applicant's letter advising he has been waiting for over a
year for approval, and requested that staff process
j applications and requests as soon as possible after receipt.
Mayor Washburn suggested that Crime Prevention Officer Rubio
meet with the vendor to address potential safety, enforcement
and traffic control issues. He questioned the term of the
license. Administrative Services Director Boone advised that
it is for one year.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION FOR GOLDI ICE CREAM
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF REFERENCE CHECKING.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
31. Tentative Tract Map 26065: Annexation No. 58~ Zone Chanae
90-14 = Tozai, Inc. (F:160.2)(X:20.2)(X:172.2)
Located on the north side of Running Deer Road intersection
with Rolando Road. Continued from May 14, 1991.
City Manager Molendyk highlighted the proposed project, and
explained neighborhood concerns with the traffic flows in this
area. He thanked Tozai, Inc. for working with staff to
_ alleviate the concerns. Traffic Engineer Tecca detailed the
~ ~ existing traffic flows in the area, as well as the
~ alternatives considered for this plan.
Councilman Buck commented on the impacts to residents of
Mountain Avenue and the proposal to cul-de-sac Mountain
Avenue. Staff confirmed that Mountain Avenue will be
cul-de-sac'd and a new street created.
City Manager Molendyk inquired whether the latest plan should
PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - P4AY 28, 1991
be reviewed by the residents before it is approved.
Councilman Buck commented that he felt the residents concerns
had been adequately addressed.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. asking
those in faebr of this project to speak. The following persc.:
spoke:
Jesse James, President, Tozai, Inc., 3022 N. Hesperian, Santa
Ana, supported the recommendations of staff and offered to
answer questions.
Mayor Washburn asked those is opposition to speak. Hearing r:.-
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:43 p.m.
Councilman Starkey questioned the ability to approve this plar.
and assure the problems for Mountain Street are mitigated.
Councilman Buck advised that from his meetings their problems
have been resolved by this alternative.
Councilman Dominguez further advised that this has been
reviewed by the Public Works Committee two or three times.
Mayor Washburn requested that Engineerincr look at future ideG'.
traffic £low circumstances for all potential future tracts.
Councilman Buck stated for the record that it is the desire o::
this Council to prevent Mountain Avenue ever becoming a thru
street.
MOVED BY BUCK, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CAR~IED BY UNANIMOUS VOTI]
TO CERTIFY NEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-32; ADOPT THE FINDINGS LISTED
BELOW APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26065 SUBJECT TO THE FOLL04VINC
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 91-4; ADOPT ORDINANC,
N0. 910, AND ENDORSE ALTERNATIVE "C" AS THE ACCEPTABLE GENERAL
PLAN COLLECTOR ALIGNMENT AND DIRECT STAFF TO PURSUE THE PROPOSED
CONNECTION OF RUNNING DEER TO LINCOLN STREET.
Findinas = Tentative Tract Ma~ 26065
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provision f~.~;
its design and improvement, is consistent with the
General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible
with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan and any
applicable Specific Plan. (Government Code Section
66473.5).
2. The Planning Commission has considered the ef£ects of
its action upon the housing needs of the region and has
balanced these needs against the public service needs of
its residents and available fiscal and environmental
resources. (Government Code Section 66412.3)
3. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent
feasible, for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision. (Government
Code Section 66473.1)
4. The Planning Commission shall determine whether the
discharqe of waste from the proposed subdivision into
the existing sewer system would result in a violation of
the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et. seq, of
the California Water Code. If the Planning Commission
finds that the proposed waste discharge would result in
i
i I
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
or add to a violation of said requirements, the Planning
Commission may disapprove the tentative map or maps of
the subdivision. (Government Code Section 66474.6)
5. Tentative Tract Map 26065 shall become effective at such
time as annexation of the site to the City of Lake
Elsinore is approved by the City Council and the Local
Agency Formation Commission and recorded.
' 6. Subject to the attached conditions, the proposed
project is not expected to result in any significant
environmental impacts.
Findinas - Annexation 58
1. The proposed annexation area is entirely within the
City's Sphere of Influence.
2. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to the City
of Lake Elsinore.
Findinas - Zone Chanae 90-14
1. This project is consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the General Plan.
2. This request will bring the zoning for the project area
into conformance with the General Plan.
3. This request and its associated project will not have a
significant impact on the environment.
4. This Zone Change establishes the necessary pre-zoning
for this site.
~ Plannina. Division Conditions
1. Tentative Tract Map will expire two (2) years from date
of the recording of Annexation 58 unless an extension of
time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council
in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the State of
California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply to all
applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code, Title 16 unless modified by the Conditions of
Approval.
3. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all
lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
4. Signage for this subdivision shall require City Permits.
5. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site
preparation activity.
6. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by
the Planning Division.
~ 7. Al1 grading shall conform to the requirements of Section
~ 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the
Uniform Building Code.
8. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and
grading for subject development as required by the City
Engineer and Chief Building Official.
a) Delete.
PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
b) Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all
improvements and grading.
9. Pay all applicable fees in force at time of issuance of
building permits.
10. Prior.to final approval of Tract Map 26065 the
improv~ments specified herein and approved by the
Planning Commission and the City Council shall be
installed, or the bonds and agreement for said !
improvements, shall be submitted to the City, and all
other stated conditions shall be complied with.
11. Prior to final Tract Map approval by the City Council,
all lots within this subdivision shall conform to the
minimum dimensional standards of the R-1 Zoning District.
12. Prior to final approval, provide drainage acceptance
letters from adjacent property owners to be approved by
the City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded.
13. Prior to Final Map approval, applicant shall obtain
off-site slope easements for grading from adjacent
property owners. Such easements shall be approved by the
City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded.
14. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City
Building Division.
15. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's
Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake
Elsinore.
16. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire
Department. ~
17. Applicant must meet all requirement~ of Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
18. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer
for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals
shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be
delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for
submittal to the E.V.M.W.D.
19. The developer shall submit plans to Southern California
Edison for a layout of the street lighting system. The
cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy
charges shall be the responsibility of the developer.
Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be
installed in accordance with the City Standards.
20. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison
Company.
21. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas Company.
22. Meet all requirements of General Telephone Company.
23. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and '
signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and
approval prior to installation.
24. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction
phase of this project shall be subja~t to ~ppraval of the
Community Development Director.
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
25. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of landscape
and irrigation plans for model homes (if such are
desired), back-up wall areas, street trees and slope
planting in accordance with the City Landscape
Guidelines, prior to issuance of building permits.
26. 5ubdivider shall record CC & R's for the project
prohib'iting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trallers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC & R's
shall also include screening any ground base disk and no
roof-mounted or front yard disk shall be allowed. CC
& R's shall be subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director, or his designee, prior to
recordation of any deeds or final map. CC & R's shall be
recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of
occupancy for the units when developed in the future.
27. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor plans,
landscaping and fences/walls shall require Minor Design
Review approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Al1 standards of development and procedural steps in
effect at the Minor Design Review submittal shall apply
for this project.
28. Decorative block or masonry walls shall be required.
Precise design, materials and location to be determined
through Minor Design Review process.
29. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any
other site preparation activity will require the
appropriate City permits. A Geologic Soils Report with
associated recommendations will be required for grading
permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's
Grading ordinance, subject to the approval of the Chief
Building Official and Planning Division. Interim and
permanent erosion control measures are required. The
applicant shall bond l00% for material and labor for one
(1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the
site is rough graded.
30. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department.
31. All residences shall be served by a sidewalk along lot
frontage.
32. Finished slopes shall not exceed 1:2.
Engineerina Department
33. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map approval.
34. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
35. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34; Resolution
85-26).
36. Submit a'~Will-Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from ~he applicable water district, stating
PAVE EIi:HT ° CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
t;:.it water and sewer arrangements have been made for this
px~~ject. Submit this letter prior to applying for
bc :_lding permit.
37. Cc::zstruct all public works improvements per approved
street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permit (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.34).
38. 'Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title 12,
Chapter 12.08 and Resolution 83-78).
39. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes
(Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
40. Desirable maximum grade for local streets is nine percent
(9~). The maximum grade of fifteen percent (15%) should
only be used because of design constraints.
41. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements
for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners
prior to final map approval.
42. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities
(power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley
shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his
agent.
43. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing
by Riverside County Fire Department.
44. Provide street lighting and show 1~_ghting improvements on
street improvement plans as requir~d by the City
Engineer.
45. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final map.
Developer shall mitigate any flooc!ing and/or erosion
downstream caused by development oi site and diversion of
drainage.
46. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District
Standards.
47. Contribute $100.00 towards the City's Master Entryway
Sign Program.
48. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for
the construction of public works improvements and shall
post the appropriate bonds.
49. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic reports including
street design recommendations. Provide final Soils
Report showing compliance with preliminary and finish
grade certification.
50. L~~t drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
a~cepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of
dt'r~inage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 2g, 1991
51. All tracts and engineering shall be digitized by
developer per City standard, tapes to be provided prior
to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. If at the time
of Certificate of Occupancy no system has been
established by the City, this condition shall be waived,
and the Developer will pay a fee of $1,000.00 per sheet
for future digitizing.
52. All local streets shall have sixty (60) feet right-of-way
and forty (40) feet curb-to-curb.
53. With the development of this site, all storm facilities
shall provide tract and immediate downstream property
owners with 100 year storm flood protection.
54. Developer shall provide No Parking and Street Sweeping
Signs for streets within tract or pay a fee for
installation by the City.
55. Developer shall contribute a total of $9,000.00 towards
the design and construction of a traffic signals on Robb
Road and Grand Avenue; Robb Road and Mountain or Runninq
Deer Road. This development will increase traffic on
Robb Road and Mountain at least 1% and 5% respectively
and should contribute towards their construction.
56. Al1 adjacent property that have access to public
right-of-ways which are abandoned as part of this map,
shall be provided with approved public right-of-way
access by dedication on this map.
57. Developer shall revise drainage to provide for a major
portion of the tract to drain to Running Deer Road
subject to approval of the City Engineer. Applicant
shall work with developer of Tract 24856 to reconstruct
Rolando for 1/2 of the street to drain into Orange
Blossom Way of Tract 24856, if this is not feasible
applicant shall contribute $15,000.00 for a pro-rata
share of a storm drain on Rolando Street.
58. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers
in the street at all fire hydrant locations.
59. Annexation to the City~s Landscaping and Lighting
District is required prior to approval of a Final Tract
Map.
60. The proposed street at the north boundary of the tract
shall be moved to be in alignment with the existing
street right-of-way.
RESOLUTION N0. 91-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO
ANNEX TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTAIN UNINHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 58 -
TOZAI, INC."
ORDINANCE NO. 910
' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, PREZONING 10.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF RUNNING DEER
ROAD AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH ROLANDO ROAD FROM R-R (RIVERSIDE
COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
(ZONE CHANGE 90-14; TOZAI, INC.).
PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, :.991
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK~ DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
32. Annexation 55 = Conductina Authoritv Hearina. (F:20.2)
Approximately 20 acres generally located northeasterly along
Interstate 15, southwest of Dexter Avenue, northwest of Second
Avenue and southeast of Central Avenue. Resolution No. 91-43.
City Manager Molendyk detailed the location of the proposed
annexation and prior actions to date.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. asking
those persons interested in this item to speak. Hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:49 p.m.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 91-43 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO
TRANSMIT CERTIFIED COPIES AND THE $250 FILING FEE TO THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMkTION COMMISSION FOR FINAL PROCESSING AND FILING WITH
THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED ANNEXATION NO. 55,
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE.
33. Annexation 56 _ Conductina Authoritv Hearina. (F:20.2)
Machado island area annexation area.
City Manager Molendyk explained that Annexation No. 56 was
initiated at the request of Riverside County Local Agency
Formation Commission when the Marinita-Meeker Annexation
was approved, because this area became an "island area"
surrounded by the City. He also explained the requirements
for annexation under the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization act, and the Council's responsibility as
"conducting authority". He further explained the Landscaping
and Street Lighting Assessment District and that the area
would be accepted "as is".
City Attorney Harper explained that if there is less than 25%
of the registered voters protest, then the Council may adopt a
resolution ordering the annexation without an election, if in
excess of 25~ of the registered voters protest than there must
be an election and if the protests exceed 50% the matter is
abandoned.
The City Clerk reported that eight letters of protest had
been received.
City Attorney Harper stated that the City had received eight
(8) written protests and there were three hundred and twelve
(312) notices to voters in the territory to be annexed.
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
Mayor Washburn opened the Public Hearing at 7:54 p.m. asking
those persons who wished to address Council to speak. The
following people spoke:
1. Mr. Robert Brewer, 31870 St. Pierre Lane, questioned
the zoning which is currently zoned for horses.
City Attbrney Aarper explained that at the time of
annexation whatever use the property is currently being
used for will continue until such time as the property
ceases to be used for that purpose.
Mr. Brewer further questioned City Attorney Harper
regarding the sale of property and whether a change could
occur at that time.
City Attorney Harper stated that it is the continued use
that is pertinent and not the sale of property. If the
property is being used as a meat market and sold and
continues to be used as a meat market then that is what
it is. If the use after the sale is not a meat market it
will not be allowed again if it is not zoned for that use.
Councilman Winkler stated that several of the developments
have been required to develop equestrian trails in that
area for the horse properties.
Mr. Brewer questioned the opening of St. Pierre as a
through street instead of a cul-de-sac as it is now.
Mayor Washburn advised that no change is proposed.
2. Eugene Fines, 31857 St. Pierre Lane, questioned what the
City has to offer the residents of the island area.
Mayor Washburn stated that the annexation would give
residents of that area local representation, local
emergency servioe, more attention to planning concerns and
local response to code enforcement issues.
City Manager Molendyk reminded all persons present that
this action was not requested by the City of Lake Elsinore
but was imposed by the Riverside County Local Agency
Formation Commission. He further stated that a number of
these residents have been anticipating the annexation.
Mr. Fines then questioned the amount of written protests
received and asked how the procedure worked. City Attorney
Harper clarified the legal process for protests.
Mr. Fines questioned the zoning and use chanqe that could
be made by the City. City Attorney Harper further
clarified that a use is allowed to continue on a property
regardless of zoning until the use is discontinued.
City Attorney Harper stated for the record that there is
an existing 1972 Act Lighting and Landscaping District on
the properties. All that would happen is that the
authority to administer the district would be transferred
from the County to the City.
3. Mr. Alan Manee, Manee Consulting, spoke in favor of the
" annexation. He further stated that they attended the
L.A.F.C.U. meetings regarding this issue in September,
1990 for public input.
4. Ms. Gail Matson, 15057 Zieglinde Drive, stated that she
was in opposition to the annexation and wanted to know
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
when the land use would be changed. City Attorney
Harper stated that the land use is not going to be changed
by the annexation.
Ms. Matson questioned the Premier Tract and the retention
of the equestrian trail. Council assured Ms. Matson that
the equestrian trails would remain even if the tract were
sold. ~
5. Mr. Mike Reichard, 6405 Broadway, questioned the zoning
of inedium-high density at Broadway and Machado. He
expressed concern that this is not compatible with the
properties behind it. City Attorney Harper commented that
the County zoning was R-3 and the City's R-3 is generally
less aensity than the County's.
6. Lydia Swank, Zieglinde, sta
that there had to be 25% to
further asked if it was too
Attorney Harper stated that
was sent by L.A.F.C.O. and
requirements.
ted that she was not aware
protest the annexation. She
late to file protests. City
the form sent is the same as
conforms to public notice
Councilman Winkler further clarified the protest
requirements.
7. Mr. Robert Ponce, 31297 Machado Street, stated that in
September, 1990, this process started and everyone was
aware of it and the public had an opportunity to make
their comments at that time.
Mayor Washburn, hearing no further comments, closed the Public
Hearing at 8•31 p.m.
Councilman Buck stated that he has a concern with the map
regarding the R-3 zoning and wished to confirm the amount of
dwelling units allowed and conform if the amount is lower.
Councilman Starkey stated that everyone received a notice and
was given an opportunity to protest this annexation.
Councilman Winkler stated that if there had not been the
neighborhood meetings where the area was given a change to
state their views that he might have some reservations, but he
felt that the public was given more than ample opportunity to
protest.
Mayor Washburn stated that he felt that this was a good
annexation in as much as services and representation is more
accessible to the residents.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY STARKEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE ANNEXATION N0. 56 - MACHADO/HAMI~2ERHEAD AND PRESENT
RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION AT NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON
JUNE 11, 1991.
34. Acauisition of Property for Collier Avenue. (F:156.2)
Resolution No. 91-44.
Engineering Manager O'Donnell reported that this item is to
implement the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire -
subject property by eminent domain. He further explained that
this is being done for additional right-of-way, easements for
slope and drainage and wetland mitigation.
City Manager Molendyk detailed the total acreage for the
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
roadway vs. acreage for wetland mitigation. City Attorney
Harper stated that out of the $500,000 total cost;
approximately $300,000 is being spent on wetlands and $200,000
for actual roadway.
The City Clerk reported no written comments or protests.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 9:48 p.m. asking
those persons interested in this item to speak. The following
persons spoke:
1. Alan Manee, Manee Consulting, representing Weldon
Page, AP# 378-020-009, stated that he is not speaking in
opposition to the action to acquire property, but would
like the opportunity to address concerns to the
Engineering Department regarding drainage, accessibility
to property and the method of calculations for his client.
Mr. Derrick Kantar, Glenn Lukos Associates, advised
that he conducted the wetlands study and stated that
appropriate wetlands are determined by three factors: (1)
Hydrology, (2j soils characteristics and (3) vegetation.
He further stated that the area already had existing
wetland and therefore the ratio was raised to compensate.
Mr. Molendyk questioned the ratio. Mr. Kantar stated
that it is almost a three (3) to one (1).
Mayor Washburn asked if the wetlands could be used for
other activities for the public.
Mr. Kantar stated that it could not be in active use by
the public in order to preserve the integrity of the
-, wetland. It can be used as a passive area for the public
~ with boardwalks through it so the public can enjoy seeing
i the wetlands.
2. Mr. Dick Knapp, 29690 Dwan, questioned the acquisition
and what it means.
Mayor Washburn stated that the City was required to
create new wetland areas (beyond what exists).
City Manager Molendyk clarified that the agencies will
not accept what is there, but rather the City had to
create new wetlands.
Mr. Knapp then asked who was paying for this. Mayor
Washburn stated that the Redevelopment Agency is paying
for it.
Mr. Knapp asked if there was a contribution by the
property owners.
Mr. Knapp questioned the property owners contribution Mr.
Molendyk explained that as part of the Outlet Center's
Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency, the Redevelopment
Agency is doing the improvements.
3. Mr. Fred Crowe, Keith Companies, 565 Chaney, stated that
he would encourage the City to negotiate for the best
possible deal to benefit the City.
Mr. Kantar stated that the plans for>the wetland were done
with the future in mind, so that when the City has future
projects the mitigation will ba covered.
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28~ 1991
4. Mr. Charles Schultz, Law Firm of Reed and Hillard, 3880
Lemon Street, Riverside, representing Mr. George
Koliber, AP # 378-020-050 and 378-020-003; stated that
his client did not received any notice of purchase of
wetland and a substantial portion of his property is
proposed wetland which the owner intended to develop.
Mr. Schultz stated that he is expressing his client's
opposition to the project.
Mr. Kantar explained that the wetlands on the Outlet
Center were mitigated on the outlet Center's property
itself. He further explained that Mr. Koliber's property
is proposed as a wetland mitigation site because the area
already exists as a wetland and is in a FEMA floodway
area. The choice was made to conform everything to
existing wetlands and £loodway.
Mr. Molendyk inquired whether the decisions were based on
FEMA regulations which allow building in the Flood Plain,
but not in a Flood Way. Mr. Kantar confirmed this.
5. Cappy Carpenter, 16755 Grand Avenue, objected to the
expenditure of Redevelopment funds for private property
for the wetlands. She suggested an alternative approach
utilizing recently closed military bases for trade off
property.
6. Jon Friedman, Long Beach Equities, AP# 389-200-013 as
well as other property on Lake Street stated his concern
regarding dedication of right-of-way for Collier and
Nichols and stated that as part of recording the parcel
map on their project the right-of-way is a part of it,
they stated that they prefer not to have the land
purchased because it will be deeded to the City with the
Final Parcel Map. He further stated that his firm is in
support of the project.
Mayar Washburn, hearing no further comments, closed the Public
Hearing at 9:14 p.m.
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY BUCK AND CARRIED WITH WINKLER
ABSTAINITIG TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 91-44:
RESOLUTION N0. 91-44
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR
COLLTER AVENUE.
BUSINESS/DIS~USSION ITEMS
51. Tract 19344 Extension of Time = CLL Builders. (F:160.2)
A request to extend the nap an additional one year period.
The subdivision is located North o£ Union Street between
Skylark & Corydon Streets. Continued from May 14, 1991.
City Manager Molendyk detailed the project and the amended
conditions.
Mayor Washburn commented that the new conditions seem to
address the concerns.
Councilman Winkler commented, for the current residents in
this area, on the pending park for their neighborhood.
MOVED BY BUC1{, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TRACT MAP 19344 BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL:
Findinas
1. Suus£antial costs associated with the project flood
contro~ channel improvement plans have been incurred by
the Applicant, and the Applicant has provided staff
evidence that they have maintained an on-going effort to
complete processing the flood control plans with the
County Flood Control District.
2. Conditions have been added by the Engineering and
Planning Departments to insure the development will not
impact public health, safety and welfare.
Conditions = Tract 19344
1. Approval Contingent upon certification by City Council
of a Focused Environmental Impact Report.
2. Approval contingent upon approval of annexation request
by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
3. A finding of conformity to the adopted General Plan.
4. Applicant shall record CC & R's for the Tract prohibiting
on-street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailers, and
trucks over one-ton capacity and roof-mounted, or
front-mounted microwave antennas.
5. Meet all City codes and ordinances.
6. Applicant shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No.
572.
7. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the
Elementary and High School Districts to offset
overcrowding.
8. All trees planted along streetscape must be a minimum of
fifteen (15) gallon size.
9. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division and
Engineering Department a map showing all eight (8) phases
of development.
10. Trailers utilized during the construction phase shall be
approved by the Planning Division.
11. Applicant will utilize the highest Uniform Building Code
values pertinent to seismic structural design, as per
Senior Building Official and/or ICBO recommendations.
12. Applicant shall submit plans/specifications for six-foot
(6') decorative block wall along project perimeter to
Planning/Engineering Departments for review, as per map
~ item number 23. This item is subject to review and final
, approval by Design Review Board.
i
13. Meet County Fire Department requirements for fire
protection.
14. Meet County Health Department requirements.
15. Meet Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements.
PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
16. Applicant shall submit design elevations to the Design
Review Board for approval.
17. Delete.
18. Participate in City-wide entry-signage program
19. All si~nage must be under permit.
20. All park and recreational facilities must be improved to
standards and specifications of Recreation and Park
District and/or City Council.
21. Provide transit facilities (i.e., covered bus stops)
within said project as deemed applicable by Chairman of
Lake Elsinore T.ransit System.
22. Participate in ]_:andscaping and Lighting District.
23. All slopes must be planted with erosion control
vegetation to be approved by Planning Division.
24. Delete.
25. Require developer to dedicate five (5) acres for park
usage and improve 2.7 acres of the five (5) acres.
Improvement and location within the thirteen (13) acres
to be at staff's discretion, as a condition of the final
map. Remainder of the thirteen (13) acres, which is not
park site, to be dedicated as a buffer zones.
26. The entry to be as proposed by the developer, a small
moxiument .
27. Delete lots 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 192, 193, 194 and
181, for creation of a buffer zone between the
development and the airport.
28. Include a clause notifying buyers within the Tract of the
development's proximity to an airport, to be recorded on
eac:h lot.
29. Dedicate 20 (20) additional feet of right-of-way along
Corydon Road.
30. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards from
centerline to lip of gutter on Corydon Road. Tests must
be provided to show that existing paving is to the City
Standards and will support the traffic load represented
by the City Engineer's traffic index. Obtain Riverside
County permits as required.
31. Construct curb, gutter and paving on all proposed streets
to the specifications of the City Engineer.
32. St~:eet plans and specifications to be prepared by a
rec~istered Civil Engineer and will include signing and
striping. As-built street, grading, utility and drainage
im~:rovement plans are required.
33. Consent to sign an agreement to pay Traffic Safety
Mitigation fee for future traffic signalization in the
amount of $225.00 per lot or provide cash bond to
guaLantee construction of one signalized intersection
upori demand by the City on Corydon Road at either
Palomar Street or Grand Avenue. Provide services of a
trazfic engineer to study the need of a signalized
PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
intersection at Corydon Road and Palomar Street.
34. Install six-foot (6') sidewalk adjacent to all curbs and
gutters except eight-foot (8') width along the commercial
frontage.
35. Construct curb, gutter, sidewalk and on-half street
paving to ten feet (10') past centerline for the
extension of Palomar Street to Corydon Road. City will
assist developer in acquiring right-of-way by
corresponding with the property owner. Developer must
dedicate required right-of-way. the City is to assist
the developer in acquiring the right-of-way. If the City
and the developer are able to obtain this particular
right-of-way, then the developer should at the
development stage of other property, be responsible for
his half of Palomar Street, as provided in the
Subdivision Map Act and to conform with same.
36. Public improvements to conform with City Code
requirements and City approved Riverside County Standard
Drawings and Specifications.
37. Centerline of Union Street must align with centerline of
existing Union Street southeast of Corydon Road.
38. All local streets which are not terminated in cul-de-sacs
shall have 60-foot right-of-way with 40-foot wide
curb-to-curb roadway. Cul-de-sac streets to be 56-foot
right-of-way, with a thirty-six foot (36') curb-to-curb
roadway.
39. Provide Class II or equivalent bike lane on Corydon Road
as approved by the City Engineer.
40. Provide bus turnout and bus shelter on Corydon Road as
approved by the City Engineer and the Lake Elsinore
Transit System.
41. All grading must conform to City Ordinance No. 636 and
the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70. Erosion control
planting and irrigation must be approved by the City
Engineer.
42. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including
street design recommendations. Provide final soils
report showing compliance with preliminary and finish
grade certifications.
43. Street trees shall be provided, type, size and placement
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
44. Provide grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer. All property lines shall be at the top of the
construction slopes with the required Uniform Building
Code setback requirements.
45. The northwesterly corner of this proposed Tract 19344 is
below elevation 1270, the lowest corner being elevation
1261. Earth fill up to as high as 1276 is being proposed
in this northwest corner of the tract to provide
recreation and public facilities.
City Ordinanoe No. 603 states in Section 2.3-1(3):
"Review all development permits to determine whether the
proposed development adversely affects the flood carrying
capaaity of the area of special flood hazard. For
PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
purposes of this ordinance, 'adverse affects~ means that
the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when
combined with all other existing and <znticipated
development will not increase the wat~~r surface elevation
of base flood more than one foot at a~iy point in the City
of Lake Elsinore flood plain,°
Paved parking areas and other minor sLructures associated
with`recreation facilities are proposed below elevation
1270. City Ordinance No. 711 states in section three:
"No person, firm or corporation shall construct any new
non-residential structure within the City of Lake
Elsinore with the foundation or basement lower than the
elevation of 1270 mean sea level within the perimeter
streets of Lake Elsinore consisting of Grand Avenue,
Riverside Drive, Mission Trail and Corydon Road, except
as specifically permitted by the City Council on a
case-by-case review."
Planning Commission and City Council must interpret the
proposals shown on this Tentative Tract with
consideration of these ordinance requi.rements and make
appropriate findings.
46. The hill or rise near the center of this site is proposed
to be removed and involves a maximum cut of fifty-nine
(59) to sixty (60) feet. The grading ordinance Number
636 states in Section Two (A):
"This ordinance shall provide for the preservation of the
natural scenic character of the land, consistent with
reasonable economic enjoyment of such property".
The Planning Commission and City Council must make a
finding that this proposed land development is consistent
with the Ordinanoe requirements and changing of the
topography is necessary, because of the unusual character
of this site and necessary for the property owner to
enjoy a substantial property right.
47. Install ornamental street lighting as approved by the
City Engineer.
48. Comply with the requirements of Riverside County Flood
Control report, dated July 2, 1984, and additional or
alternative requirements of the City Engineer and the
City Code. The City Engineer shall judge as to
interpretation and application of flood control
recommendations.
49. Submit hydrology and hydraulic studies, necessary master
planning and detailed plans and profiles of the proposed
flood control facilities to Riverside County Flood
Control District and to the City Engineer for review and
approval prior to Final Map recordation. Provide
drainage easements as required by the City Engineer.
50. Construct box culvert(s) under Corydon Road and Union
Street with inlet facility to the satisfaction of
Riverside County Road Department, Riverside County Flood
Control, and the City Engineer.
51. All major drainage facilities in this Tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County'Flood Control District
standards and agreement entered into with the District
for construction, ownership and maintenance.
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
52. Provide for a drainage ditch and/or a retaining wall,
along the southwest boundary of this Tract, of a
decorative nature as approved by the City Engineer for
added flood protection. The drainage channel along the
southwest boundary of this Tract shall be provided with a
ten foot (10') top width maintenance road. An
irrevocable offer of dedication of an easement shall be
given'by developer for this drainage facility. City
will not accept the easement, but will leave underlying
ownership and maintenance responsibility with the
individual home owner.
53. Comply with the requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District, County Health Department and California
Regional water Quality Control Board for sewage disposal.
Provide letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District pertaining to agreement regarding sewage
disposal construction.
54. Developer to hook-up to regional sewer system. Install
cleanouts behind the sidewalk on all sewer laterals as
required by the City and/or Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District. Developer acknowledges that sewer
lateral maintenance from the sewer main in the street to
the property line is homeowner or Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District's responsibility. No occupancy
will be granted until sewer service is available from
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District regional
sewerage collection and treatment system.
55. Provide a will-serve letter guaranteeing water service
from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
56. Dedicate underground water rights and future water site
to the City or its assignee.
57. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement Fund fees per
Ordinance No. 572.
58. Pay all sewer fees as required by Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District.
59. Pay all Public Safety fees (police and fire) per
Resolution No. 83-87.
60. Pay all School fees.
61. Prior to Final Map recordation, a subdivision agreement
shall be entered into with the developer(s), owner(s) and
the City.
62. Final Map shall show the following items with a prominent
note:
a) All geologic fault lines,
b) 100-Year and 500-Year Flood Plain,
c) Areas subject to flood hazards.
63. Provide Tract Phasing Plan for City Engineer's approval.
Bond public improvements for each phase, as approved by
the City Engineer.
64. Record a Notice of 100-Year Flood Hazard and waiver of
City liability.
65. Applicant will contribute pro rata share toward fire
fighting facilities serving the southeastern end of the
PAGE LWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28', 1991
City. Amount not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000.).
66. Applicant to agree to join Assessment District for the
San Jacinto Bridge.
67. A. A.district to be formed under the Lighting and
Landscaping Act of 1982 (commencing with Section
22500 of the Streets and Highways Code) to pay for
the annual cost of lighting, landscaping and parks
which benefit the project, by the annual levy and
collection of an assessment within the Project Area.
B. A Community Facilities District to be formed under
the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
(commencing with Section 53311 of the Government
Code) to pay for the cost of fire, police and storm
water protection services, by the annual levy and
collection of a special tax within the project area.
The developer agrees to waive any right of protest
under the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1982.
Furthermore, the developer agrees to vote
affirmatively on the ballot proposition to k~e
submitted at a special election incident to
proceedings under the Mello Roos Community Facilities
Act of 1982.
68. Developer shall complete construction of the 4.85 acre
park site which includes the 2.7 acre active park and
have it ready £or premaintenance acceptance by the
Director of Community Services concurrent with the
first Certificate of Occiapancy, excluding the model
complex, for the next cor~structed phase. Provided the -
City has funds, Developer shall share the cost and
participate in the installation of turf hydroseeding and
permanent irrigation of the remaining approximate 7.0
acre park site; otherwise, Developer shall install
erosion control measures on-site in accordance with the
previous parks agreement.
69. All improvement plans and tracts shall be digitized. At
Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes
and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC INFO/
GIS or developer to pay $1,000 per sheet for City
digitizing.
70. Developer shall provide "No Parking" and "Street
Sweeping" signs for streets within the tract or pay a
fee for installation by the City.
71. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers
in the street at all fire hydrant locations.
72. Tract building and grading permit phasing shall be in
accordance with agreed upon sequence of development
activities signed August 1, 1988.
BUSINESS ITEMS
52. Second Readina = Ordinance No. 916, (F:170.6)
Relating to Grant of Franchise - Jones Intercable of San
Diego, Inc.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY BUCK TO ADOPT ORDINANCE N0. 916:
PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
ORDINANCE NO. 916
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO PROVIDE A COMMUNITY
ANTENNA TELEVISION SYSTEM FRANCHISE TO JONES INTERCABLE OF SAN
DIEGO, INC.
UPON THE FOLLOWTNG ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER,
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk reminded Council of the Joint City
Council/Planning Commission Study Session scheduled for Thursday,
May 30 at 3:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Dominguez commented on Briarwood Mobile Home Park and
the original intention that it be a Adult Park. He suggested that
staff contact Mr. Lyle Hodges (former owner) to clarify.
Councilman Starkey also commented on Briarwood Park and on the
residents contacts with Assemblyman Clute's office and his efforts
to pursue the concerns.
Councilman Dominguez expressed concern with the Rodeo and the
closure of Franklin Street. He felt the barricades were not
placed pursuant to Council's direction and commented that he would
not support closure of this street for future requests.
Councilman Starkey commented on the success of the Rodeo with
higher attendance levels and income than previous Rodeos. He also
commented on the need for a larger facility for future Rodeos.
Councilman Winkler requested that staff bring back recommendations
for prewiring of commercial and industrial buildings by the end of
June. He also reminded Council of the Annual Meeting of the
Western Riverside Council of Governments. He expressed concern
with the scheduling of the budget study session during the week
rather than on Saturday.
Mayor Washburn commented on a call received from Mr. Tom Arbor
regarding a stolen water meter. He also commented on the success
of the Rodeo and the need for additional parking on site. He
suggested that the Chamber consider a full time Rodeo Director to
assist with locating a new site.
City Attorney Harper requested a Joint Closed Session to discuss
pending litigation involving Lake Elsinore Associates, Jones
Intercable and a property acquisition on Avenue 6.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 9:29 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:32 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION
THE CITY COUNCTL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED 5ESSION AT 9:32 P.M. FOR
DISCUSSION OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:55 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN.
PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 28, 1991
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY STARKEY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:56 P.M.
~ ~~~~~~
GARY WASHBURN~ MAYOR
CITY O LAKE ELSINORE
A TEST: 1
~~~v ~~~~~\
VICKI IiF 6AD, CI't'Y CLERK
CITY OF LAKE EL•SINORE