HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-1993 Special City Council MeetingFIINtiTES
SPECIAL CITY CODNCIL MEETENG
CIT7C OF LARE ELSYNORS
130 SOIITH MAIN STREET
LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA
AIONDAY, DECEMBER 6a 1993
as**,-,e*,~ar*,-*r,~r**,-*e*****,t*,t***********sass**r******r***********+e
CALL TO ORDER
The Special City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Washburn at 2:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS; ALONGI, CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, Administrative Services Director Boone, Special Projects
Manager Wood, Public Services Director Tecca, Community Development
Manager Shear, City Planner Leslie, Community Services Manager Best
and City Clerk Kasad.
BOSINESS ITEM
1. Memorandum of Understandina with Public Employees Association
of Riverside Countv. Ync. (F:116.2)
City Manager Molendyk explained that fhis is the annual
Memorandum of Understanding with the Riverside County Public
Employees Association; and noted that the representative was
in the audience to respond to any questions from Council. Iie
advised that Management and the Association have reached
agreement and recommended approval of the proposed Memorandum
of Understanding.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, INC.
F2ECESSED TO REDE~IELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 2:37 P.M.
RECONVENED THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 2:47 P.M.
BIISINE88 ETEM
2.
City Manager Molendyk explained that the applicant had not
planned to be at ~his meeting and thought that he had been
continued. Mr. Schleuniger, the applicant, indicated that he
does not have his engineers available for this meeting and
felt that he needed one more meeting with staff before he was
ready ~o come before Councile Mr. Molendyk stated that he
understood that there would be a presenta~ion regarding their
alternative to the original plan af this ~ime.
MOVED BY ALONGI, SECONDED BY CHERVENY TO DENY THE REQUES'`P FOR
PAGE TWQ
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL MEETIN(3
~ECEM~ER 6s ].993
MODIFICATION TO THE RETAINING WAd,L IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE LAKE
ELSINORE CYTY CENTER.
Councilman Winkler stated tha~ Council had nothing in front of
them for a decision at this time.
Councilman Alongi statea3 ~ha~ ghe item appeared on the Agenda
~o give the Council the opportunity to review the changes that
they are proposing; however they are not present and his
motion was to deng the request.
Councilman Winkler aslced why it woulci not be possible to give
~hem a change to presen~ their idea. Iie explained that they
are already on record as having to continue what they are
doing.
Councilman Alongi explained that when they were present the
last time, he thought this issue was settled. He commented
that he was under the impression that they were on a tight
~ime line, and a decision had to be reached. That time has
passecl and now they are back with more plans, but no costs, no
scaled drawings of the proposed project and again it proposes
to move the wall forward which is not what he wants to see for
the project. Councilman Alongi further commented that
Councilman Winkler stated that he did not want to hear the
project again unless the applicant had a dramatic change for
considera~ion. He s~a~ed that because the Ci~y of Lake
Elsinore is a partner in this pro~ect with oak Grove Equities,
through sales tax and tax incremento in the amount of
$3,000,398.56, the City should make evidenf to Oak Grove
Equi~fes that the original plan is what has been accep~ed and
nothing else. Mr. Alongi explained that if they want to
modify the project he ffeels that they should file an
a~pplication with the Planning Department and proceed in the
regular routine, just like any other developer.
Councilman Winkler stated that fie met with the developers, ancl
loolced at their proposal and it is substantially different
~han wha~t ~hey talked about at the las~ meeting. He sta~ed
that it appeared that it would actually be an improvement over
the other proposals.
MOVED BY V1%NKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A 3-2 VOTE
WITH ALONGY AIdD CHERVENY CAS`9'ING THE DaSSENTING VOTES TO CONTINUE
TFIE %tEQUEST TO AMEND DESYGN REVIEW APPROVAY, (C 93-3) TO ALLOiJ
d+IODIFIED RETAINING WALL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY
CENTER ON GRAPE STREET (APPLICANT: OAK GROVE EQUITIES) TO THE NEXT
MEETING.
There was general discussion in regarci to size and set-back of
retaining walls and their appearance.
MOVED BY 6VINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAI, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 2:58 P.M.
c•a. nnonnvlclY ~ PlHZ'
OF LAKE ELSINORE