HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-14-1993 City Council MinutesMINQTES
REGOLAR CITY COi1NCIL MEETING
CITY OF LARE ELSINORE
31315 CHANEY STREET
Y,ARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY~ SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
•**********sfet**t******sr*a*a***sss**fefeft*+e*****,t********,r**ft****t
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Washburn at 7:04 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Attorney Harper.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director
Boone, Community Development Manager Shear, Community Services
Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special
Projects Watenpaugh, Special Projects Coordinator Wood and City
Clerk Kasad.
A. Presentation - Little Leaaue - Tournament of Chambions.
Team was not present for recognition.
B. Presentation - Update on L.E.A.F. Programs. (F:18.3)
Anne Washington, Executive Director L.E.A.F., advised that the
fifth anniversary of L.E.A.F. will be October ist. She noted
the original statistics for euthanization and adoption versus
the much improved receni statistics. She also noted the
impact of "satellite" adoption days at PETCO in Temecula. She
also advised that she has served on a County task force which
has formed a number of recommendations which will be coming to
Council for consideration. She thanked the residents,
volunteers, supporters and responsible pet owners for their
contributions to L.E.A.F.'s efforts.
C. Aggie Goodacre, representing the Temecula Town Association,
noted the recent media day to promote the upcoming tractor
race. She presented Mayor Washburn with a trophy indicating
that he had won the race on media day. Mayor Washburn
accepted the trophy and noted the tractor race to be held
October 8-10, 1993, in Temecula.
D. The Lake. (F:92.1)
City Manager Molendyk noted that the lake is still
progressing, the odor has been reduced and there has been no
PAGE TWO - CITY COIINCIL MZNIITES - SEPTEMBER id~ 1993
fish kill. He further noted that application of micro-
organisms is continuing.
Manager og Special Projects Watenpaugh advised that an
additional 4,000 pounds of Aqua treat was induced into ~he ,
lake this date. He noted that the green color is still ~
present, but the filamentous algae is gone. He also noted s
that the p.h. of the lake has been lowered and applications
will continue until October with additional recommendations to
follow. He also noted the revenues for boat launching and day
use.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether ~he City was now
selling annual passes. Mr. Watenpaugh advised that they are
available now. Mrs. Cherveny inquired whether there were
resident/non-resident prices. Mr. Molendyk advised that the
City is currently honoring the State park passes and rates for
the balance of this year.
E. The Stadium. (F:134.10)
City Manager Molendyk indicated that the project is on
schedule and noted the press conference to be held tomorrow
regarding the baseball team.
PIIBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEM3
Requests were received to address item nos. 22, 31, 37, and
deferred to those discussions.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further
discussion and consideration:
Item No. 8.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. Regular City Council Meeting - August 24, 1993. (F:44.4)
The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
b. Planning Commission Minutes - August 18, 1993. (F:60.3)
2e lteceived anci ordered filed the ~uilding Activity Report for
August, 1993. (F:32.2)
3, Received and ordered filed the Code Enforcement Activity
Report for Augus~, 1993. (F:54.1)
4. Ratified Warrant List for August 31, 1993. (F:12.3)
5. Approved the "Master Plan of Recreation and Parks 1990-2010'°
and directed staff to review and update the document annually.
(F:114.1)
6o Approved Change Order No. 7 for the Rice Canyon Water
Reservoir Storage Tank in Community Facilities District 88-3.
(F:22.3)
PAGE THREE - CITY COIINCIL MINQTES - BEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
7. Awarded Contract for 888/Whiting Ranch Trunk Sewer in
Community Facilities District 88-3 to B.K. Baker Company in
the amount of $120,040.00. (F:22.3)
9. Approved Public Hearing Date of September 28, 1993, for the
following:
a. Annexation 65, Zone Chanqe 92-6 & Tentative Tract Map
27317 - The Western Desert Corp. - located north/east of
Grand Avenue, south of the City boundary, north of
Alvarado Street, and west of the City boundary at Machado
Street. (F:20.2)(X:172.2)(X:160.2)
%TEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
8. Resolution Nos. 93-55 and 93-56 relatina to Stadium Financina.
(F:134.10)
City Attorney Harper indicated that the Council should not act
on Resolution No. 93-55 because the agreement had not yet been
received and it is more appropriate for the Public Finance
Authority to act on it. He further indicated that it would be
appropriate to act on Resolution No. 93-56.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether the amount need to
complete the Stadium was in fact $12 million. Special
Projects Coordinator Wood concurred and explained the
procedure. Mrs. Cherveny inquired whether there was an
additional $5 million which needed to be refinanced. Mr. Wood
indicated that it was $5.7 million. Mrs. Cherveny commented
that there was a total of $24 million being proposed for
bonds, with $19 million to obtain the $12 million for the
Stadium. Mr. Wood clarified that the total issuance would be
for $22,471,000. City Attorney Harper clarified that the
amount was $12,121,400 and 10,300,000. Councilwoman Cherveny
inquired where the $5 million is. Mr. Harper advised that it
was in the tax exempt remainder bonds for infrastructure and
capital appreciation.
Councilwoman Cherveny further commented that the basic
scenario is that there is $19 million for the Stadium, when
only $12 million will actually be used to build it. Mr. Wood
further clarified the related expenses. Mr. Harper calculated
that approximately $16.8 million related to the $!2 million
for the Stadium.
Councilwoman Cherveny also commented that this would encumber
all three Redevelopment areas. Mr. Wood confirmed, noting
that any issuance does this. Mrs. Cherveny requested
confirmation that there could be no other projects for five
years. Mr. Wood confirmed that there could be no more capital
projects for five years. Mrs. Cherveny questioned whether
this would prevent lake projects as well. Mr. Wood confirmed
only in the case that no additional tax increment is generated
by new growth. Mrs. Cherveny expressed her personal
reservations with this issuance, based on the considerations
of private citizens prior to seeking financing. She also
noted that the bonds are not insured.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY WINKLFR TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-
56.
PAGE FOIIR - CITY COiINCIL MIN[TTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
Councilman Winkler commented that Councilwoman Cherveny had
voted to authorize nearly $1 million toward the design of the
Stadiuru previously. He called for the guestion.
Councilman Alongi commented that he has been consistent in his
vote on this issue. He noted that they had been informed that
the ball field would cost $14 million, but noting was
mentioned about $24 million in bonds. He indicated that he is
not opposed to the field, only the method proposed. He
stressed the inability to foresee the future. He also
stressed ~he need for all Council to have the same
information.
Mayor Washburn stressed the other debt being absorbed, reserve
account being allocated and collateralization for curbs,
gutters, etc. He further stressed the positive impact this
projec~ will have on local growth and the ability to generate
additional dollars for the Lake.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH CHERVENY
CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BORROWING OF FUNDS BY THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENC% FROM THE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYa
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF BENEFIT WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF
SUCH FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING OTHER MATTERS
PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETYNG &IAS RECESSED AT 7:25 P.M
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 7:36 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING3
21.
Qr'zSa.L)
City Planner Leslie, explained this project and noted that it
will bring the property into conformance with the General
Plan. He noted design concerns discussed at the Planningi
Commission hearing and advised that they have since been
resolved. He commented that this project also involves a
variance for a freeway sign.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned which elevation the freeway
sign would be on. Mr. Leslie advised that it would be a free
standing sign.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. asking
those persons in favor of this project to speak. The
following person spoke;
Robert Merriam, Carlson Desiqn and Construction, representing
the applicant, agreed to the conditions as proposed and
offered to answer questions.
Councilman Alongi inquired whether Mr. Merriam concurred with
PAGE FIVE - CITY COIINCIL MINDTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
the change recommended for the roof. Mr. Merriam advised that
they were in agreement with this.
Mayor Washburn asked those persons in opposition to speak.
Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:41 p.m.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO ADOPT NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 90-25, APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 93-3, APPROVE
ZONE CHANGE 93-2 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 963 BASED ON EXIiIBIT "B"
AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL.
NO. 963
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, REZONING .57 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET
NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE AND RAILROAD
CANYON DRIVE, FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO C-2
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (ZONE CHANGE NO. 93-2 -
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ, WINKLER,
WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT:
NONE
_ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Findings - Desian Review
1. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the
proposed project is not anticipated to result in
any significant adverse environmental impacts.
2. The project, as conditioned complies with the
Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan
and the Zoning District in which it is located.
3. This project complies with the design directives
contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter
17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the subject project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82 and the planning
district in which the site is located.
- Findinas - Zone Chanqe
1. The Zone Change, is consistent with the Goals,
Objectives and Policies of the General Plan.
2. This request will bring the zoning for the project
PAGE SI% - CITY CODNCIL MINUTES = SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
area into conformance with the General Plan.
3. The proposed Zone Change is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental
impacts.
Conditions of Apnroval - Plannina Denartment
1. Design Review approval for Commercial Project No.
93-3 will lapse and be void unless building permits
are issued within one (1) year of Planning
Commission approval. AN ex~ension of time, up to
one year of Planning Commission approval. Ara
extension of time, up to one (i) year per
extension, may be granted by the Community
Development Manager prior to the expiration of the
initial Design Review approval upon application by
the developer one (1) month prior to expiration.
2. These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced
upon Page One of Building Plans prior to their
acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety.
3. All site improvements shall be constructed as
indicated by the recommended changes and the
approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to
approved site plans or building elevations shall be
subject to the discretion of the Community
Development Manager. All plans submitted for
Building Division Plan Check shall conform with the
submitted plans or as modified by Conditions of
Approval, or the Planning Commission through
subsequent action.
4. Materials and Color Board shall be revised to
depict the recommended changes. Further changes
shall be approved by the Community Development
Manager or his designee.
5. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and release of utilities.
6e Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and
Ordinances including State handicap requirements.
7. Meet all Riverside County Health Department
requirements.
8. Meet all Riverside County Fire Department
requirements
9. No outdoox storage shall be allowed.
10. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City
standards as approved by the Community Development
Manager or designee, prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy.
11. All roof ladders and electrical panels shall be
located within the interior of the building or in
PAGE SEVEN - CITY:COIINCIL MINQTES -
14~ 1993
specially designed areas concealed from public
right-of-way view.
12. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class
"A" fire rating.
13. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning
units or other mechanical equipment incidental to
development shall be architecturally screened so
that they are not visible from neighboring
property, public streets, and the I-15. Screening
plan shall be approved by the Community Development
Manager or designee, prior to issuance of building
permit.
14. All exterior down-spouts shall be constructed
within the interior of the building.
15.. The parking lot landscaping designs shall provide
at least one (1) twenty-four-inch (24:) box tree
for every ten (10) spaces with appropriate planter
box, subject to the approval of the City's
Landscape Architect and Community Development
Manager or designee, along parking spaces labeled
as 11 through 24.
16. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be
reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape
Architect Consultant and the Community Development
Manager or designee, prior to issuance charged
prior to final landscape approval based on the
Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%).
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and
automatic sprinkler system with 100~ plant and
grass coverage using a combination of drip and
conventional irrigation methods.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected
from the City°s Street Tree List, a maximum of
thirty feet (30) apart and at least twenty-four-
inch (24") box. On areas where screening, is
necessary trees shall be at least thirty-six-inch
(36") box size.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from
paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch
(6") wide concrete.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15~) of
ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
e) Landscape ptanters shall be planted with an
appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for
50~ parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years.
f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and
screened as nart of the landscanina nlan_
PAGE EYGHT - CIT7f'COLJNCIL MYN[JTE~ - SEPTEMBER 16~ 1993
g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground
cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements
of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or
drought resistant plantinqs with combination drip
irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive
watering.
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 130~
faithful Performance Bond, and released at
completion of installation of landscape
requiremen~s approval/acceptance, and bond 100$ for
material and labor for one (1) year.
i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be
installed within affected portion of any phase at
the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested
for any building. All planting areas shall include
plantings in the Xeriscape concept drought tolerant
grasses and plants.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with
approved site plan.
k) Final landscape plans to include planting and
irrigation details.
17. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3~) in
height shall have a permanent irrigation system and
erosion control vegetation installed, approved by
the Planning Division.
18. P,11 exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets or allow
illumination above the horizontal plane of the
fixture.
19. The applicant shall develop a Uniform Sign Program
for the restaurant which specifies harmonious and
consistent colors, materials and specifications
which will enhance the restaurant's design and meet
- the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code,
Chapter 17.94. The Master Signage Program shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
All signage including freestanding signs shall be
by City Permit and in conformance with the approved
Master Signage Program. The Master Signage Program
shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual
sign permi~s are required prior to the erection of
each sign.
20. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all
requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District (E~MF1D). Applicant shall submit water and
sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all
dis~rict conditions and standards.
21. Applicant shall annex into the City's Landscape and
Liqhting District.
PAGE NINE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
22. Trailers utilized during construction shall be
approved by the Planning Division.
23. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
24. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-
inch (4") lines two-feet (2') apart.
25. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at
all internal one-way drive aisles.
26. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department for inclusion in the case records.
27. Prior t City Council consideration plans
addressing all recommended changes listed as
Conditions of approval No. 13,15, 27, 28, 29, 30,
31, and 32 shall be submitted.
28. The approved colors are illustrated on the re-
submitted materials board. The redesign of the
mansard roof or signage shall be approved by the
Community Development Manager or designee.
29. DELETED.
30. The proposed Freeway Identification Sign will be
restricted to eighty (80) square feet. Applicant
to submit revised sign plans.
31. Parking spaces labeled as one (1) and two (2) shall
be posted and reserved for employees only.
32. Prior to City Council consideration, the applicant
will be required to submit revised set of
elevations reflecting the deletion of one (1) of
the cupola, elimination of signage, and reduction
of pitch.
Conditions of AAnroval - Enaineering Department
33. All Public Works requirements shall be compliecl
with as a condition of development as specified int
he Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a
building permit is issued.
34. Process and meet all lot line adjustment
requirements prior to issuance of building permit.
35. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Checlc fees
(municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34;
Resolution 85-26).
36. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City
Engineering Department, from the applicable water
district, stating that water and sewer arrangements
have been made for this project. Submit this
letter prior to applying for building permit.
PAGE TEN - CITY COIINCIY. MYNUTES -
37. If the existing street
modified, existing street
modified accordingly ad
Engineer prior to issuance
encroachment permit will
work.
14s 1993
improvements are to be
plans' on file sha11 be
approved by the City
of building permit. An
be required to do the
38. Work done under an encroachmen~ permit for off-site
improvements shall be delineated on the street
improvement plans and approved and signed by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of building
perraits.
39. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of off-site public works improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution 83-78).
40. Arrangements for relocation of utility company
facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
41. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
42. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public
facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by
a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
43e Developer shall contribute $9,000.00 toward the
design and construction of traffic signals at the
intersections of Grape/on/off-ramps and RailroacY
Canyon Road. This development will increase
traffic at ~he intersections at least 2~ and should
contribute 2~ towards the construction.
44. Meet all ~he requirements of Chapter 15.36 of the
Municipal Code regarding Floodplain Management.
45. Mee~ all requirements of Chapter 15.64 of the
Municipal Code regarding Flood Hazard Regulations.
46. Portion of Parcel 2& 3 of Parcel Map No. 17616
shall be dedicated to the City prior to issuance of
building permit for the restaurant.
22. Lacnzna Yieiahts Specific Plan 92-3. Environmental ImAact ReAOrt
92-3 and General Plan Amendment 93-1 - The Western Companv -
Continued from Augus~ 10. 1993. (F:150.2)(X:83.2)
Councilman Winkler stated that he would be abstaining from
discussion and vote on this project due to a potential
conflict of interest and left the room.
City Manager Molendyk explainecl that at the Regular City
Council Meeting of August 10, 1993, this item was continued to
allow additional time for the applicant and the surrounding
homeowners ~o resolve concerns. He de~ailed the staff
recommendations.
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COIINCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
Mayor Washburn reminded the Council and public that this was
a continuation of the public hearing and asked that the
persons who wish to address the Council present new
information, as Council as already studied all the previous
information and has considered all previous testimony. He
then asked for those wishing to speak on the project to come
forward. The following people spoke:
Ed Schultz, 15003 Eureka Street, spoke in opposition to the
project and stated that this project will obstruct his view
because it raises the elevation of the adjoining land. He
also advised there is a six foot fence proposed on top of the
raised ground. He further addressed the drainage and the
traffic impact on Eureka Street. Mayor Washburn indicated
that this discussion related more appropriately to another
project and suggested that Mr. Schultz see City Planner Leslie
to help mitigate his concerns.
Lea Routledge, 14505 Amorose Street, Brookstone Ranch
Homeowners Association spoke in opposition to the project and
stated that she felt that the developer had not properly
addressed the greatest concerns. She stated that the view of
the ridgeline, equestrian uses, safety and traffic concerns
were not properly addressed. She stated that she felt that
the Brookstone Ranch Homeowners Association and the developer
were at a stalemate. She requested that Council deny this
project.
Philip Irving, 14867 Amorose Street, stated that he was in
opposition to the project and that Mrs. Routledge has
expressed his opinions.
Allan Knight, 30570 Brookstone Lane, stated his opposition to
this project and explained that there will be three
intersections within 500 feet and this will create a safety
hazard for the children going to and from school, as well as
a major problem with the ingress and egress of traffic on a
major thoroughfare. He further stated that he would like to
have the developer explain his insurance for this project.
David Locke, 15025 Monty Court, spoke in opposition to the
project and stated that the public hearing in regard to this
project is an "after the fact" and that the testimony is too
late to address the issues which concern the surrounding
residences. He explained that he feels that Councilman Alongi
is biased in regard to this project and the opinion of the
surrounding property owners will have no impact on his
decision to approve this project and he asked that Councilman
Alongi abstain from vote. Mr. Locke explained that he felt
that this project would endanger the natural habitat of
endangered and sensitive species in the area.
Marie Locke, 15025 Monty Court, spoke in opposition to the
project and addressed the Hillside Development. She explained
that she had learned from City Planner Leslie that the City of
Lake Elsinore does not have a Hillside Development Ordinance
at this time. Mrs. Locke defined hillside development and
asked that Council require the developer to conform to proper
hillside development. She stated that if this project is
approved that it will be setting the standard for all future
hillside development and suggested that it is not in
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COIINCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14~'1993
conformance with the State requirements.
Reggie Kramer, 15077 Patrick Court, spoke in opposition to the
project and explained tha~ she did no~ believe that the homes
proposed are compatible to the surrounding homes. She also
explained that she would like to see the City change the
entrance to go through McVicker Park.
Lee Bulen, 14949 Toft Street, commented that the community was
encouraged by the decision made by Council at the last meeting
and asked that staff respond to each point that has come to
the Council this evening.
Ace Vallejos, 15231 Cobre Street, spoke in opposition to the
project and stated that he felt that the meeting with the
residents and the developer did not accomplish a thing and he
still had concerns regarding the traffic and safety and the
potential for increased taxes. He asked that the Council
listen to.-the persons speaking in opposition to the project.
Jane Damerow, 14977 Amorose Street, spoke in opposition to the
project and stated that she felt that Amorose Street could not
handle the traffic and the danger to the children caused by
~raffic. She further stated that the obstruction og the view
of the ridgeline is a detriment to the residences. She also
objected to the amount of dust and dirt that will impact the
existing neighborhoods during construction.
Nola Johnsen, 14835 Toft Drive, spoke in opposition ~o ~he
project and asked how this project will be for the good of the
City when there are already half built development projects
that are goinq into bankruptcy. She stated that this project
will create a burden to provide necessary public safety
services to the community. Mrs. Johnsen stated that she felt
~hat this project would increase crime and all related
problems. She asked that the Council preserve the environment
and privacy of the residences by denying this project.
David Buchanan, 30831 Plumas Street, spoke in opposition to
this project and stated that he felt that the Environmental
Impact Report was seriously flawed and that it should be
reviewed by a third party to correct the errors. He also
presented a letter which he received which called out a
hearing date of September 15, 1993, and noted that erroneous
information had been provided.
Patricia Nolan, 30620 Plumas Street, spoke in opposition to
the project and stated that this project directly affects the
residents quality of life and will affect their right to
equestrian uses in the area.
Rick Stephens, The Keith Companies, 565 Chaney Street, Ste. F,
advised that horses have the same rights as cars and bicycles
on public streets. He further addressed the issues discussed
at this meeting and stated that they were covered in the staff
report. Mr. Stephens explained the park and trail system
which is set by the County and explained how that works with
this project.
Mayor Washburn asked if anyone else wished to speak. Hearing
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COONCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
no further requests, the public hearing was closed at 8:25
p.m.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the comments about the
Hillside Development ordinance and asked if there was one in
effect in the City. City Planner Leslie explained that there
was research being done to prepare a hillside ordinance.
Councilwoman Cherveny stated that her main concern was what
standards the City will require and if this project conformse
City Planner Leslie stated that without this ordinance in
place each project is taken on a case by case basis until
there is a set of regulations to give staff the guidelines.
Councilwoman Cherveny stated that she would like to see some
type of criteria set for the staff to follow.
Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that there was a conflict
between Condition No. 47 and Condition No. 52. She asked
what the correct procedure would be. Mr. Stephens explained
that no construction vehicles will be allowed on Toft Drive or
Amorose Street. Councilwoman Cherveny then asked if Condition
No. 47 should be deleted. Les Card, traffic engineer.
e~lained that Condition No. 47 addresses routine traffic and
the alternate proposed road will be for construction traffic.
Councilwoman Cherveny asked whether Laguna Heights Drive South
will be used for the residential traffic when the project is
complete. Mr. Card stated that Toft Drive and Amorose Street
will not exceed 1,300 trips a day by residential vehicles.
Councilwoman Cherveny stated that once the houses are complete
the Laguna Heights Drive South should be developed for vehicle
use to provide for the extra residential traffic.
Councilwoman Cherveny stated that this is a high risk area for
fires and last year the City had 571 homes built and there
were no new safety facilities built. She asked what
provisions will be make to accommodate 888 more homes.
Councilwoman Cherveny asked about the notices sent. City
Clerk Kasad stated that this issue was continued, which
requires no further mailed notices and only "courtesy" letters
were sent by the Planning Department. Councilwoman Cherveny
asked how many courtesy letters were sent. City Clerk Kasad
stated that she believed there were three sent in regard to
the continuance. Councilwoman Cherveny stated she is an
advocate of controlled growth and as the services are
available then the growth can occur. She stated that she
would like to see the ridgeline better addressed by the
developer. Mr. Stephens explained how the ridgeline was
handled and that this issue had been addressed by the staff
and developer to make the least impact on the ridgeline and
retain the view for the residents. He also explained what the
design manual as presented. Councilwoman Cherveny asked if
the final of this document would be reviewed by Council. City
Planner Leslie explained that this is typically heard by
Planning Commission and they would hear the design criteria
for the ridgeline. Councilwoman Cherveny asked if the
Hillside Development ordinance could be complete by the time
the design for this project is heard by Planning Commission.
City Planner Leslie stated that a Hillside Development
ordinance would take approximately six months to complete and
he did not know when this applicant would submit the design to
Planning.
EAGE FOIIRTEEN - CITY COIINCIL MIN[TTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 8993'
Councilman Alongi thanked the Amorose residents for their
cooperation and responded to Mr. Locke and explained that he
makes his mind up when all the information is presented to
Council. He noted that in some of the letters received it was
mentioned that he had done a full turn in regard ~o the
project when low income housing was mentioned. Councilman
Alongi stated that there is no low income housing in this
project, so that is not a true statement. He stated that the
defined ridgeline is not clear and is confused with skyline,
and suggested ~hat there should be a clearer definition. He
further stated that Council turned down the Lake Terrace
project and he felt that this project should have gone forward
since there were 2200 signatures in favor of the project. He
stated that the City has the obligation to be a good neighbor
and if that means providing services, he stated that he enjoys
the County's tax dollar as much as anyone else. He explained
to Mr. Locke that this project has been around for about three
years and the project-has not been hidden. When a developer
moves on his project, it is the City's responsibility to get
the bes~ project possible. Councilman Alongi explained that
he feels that the entrance to the tract should be in writing
to guarantee that the entrance will be separate from the
Amorose Street areao He further explained the Council's
obligation to the development of the City and clarified the
LAFCO process.
Councilman Alongi suggested that if the development was at one
hame per acre or 644 homes versus as planned for 888 homes,
the difference would be 244. He questioned if the difference
were split and it were proposed for 764 homes in the area, if
that would malce a difference. He stated that he would make
his decision based on all the information presented.
Councilman Dominguez explained that the growth of small cities
is a reality and that Lake Elsinore is no exception. He
further explained that dust caused by construction is
controlled by watering. Councilman Dominguez stated that the
City makes a major effort to be a good neighbor, but the
responsibility of the Council is ~o the citizens within ~he
City of Y,ake Elsinore and their building rights within the
Cityo
YKayor Washburn explained commented on the information
presented and material provided and stated that he felt staff
overall does a good job of placing conditions which meet ~he
circumstances whether it is State or City Laws and gave
examples.
Mayor Washburn asked staff if this project were to go forward
~o LAFCO, at what point, would LAFCO require that Brookstone
is annexed. He noted the concern for horses and the interest
of the residents to make sure that the zoning would change to
meet their requirements. He inquired whether the City changes
the code to meet their needs. City Planner Leslie explained
~hat once the City made a decision to move ahead then there
would be a prezoning for that area to meet the requirements of
the residents.
Mayor Washburn then asked the applicant~s engineer about the
three intersections which are 500 feet apart. The applicants
engineer stated that this is handled through the conditions of
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COtTNCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
approval for turn-outs and traffic control. Mayor Washburn
asked about the minor wetlands and stated that he would like
to see this handled without affecting the wetlands.
Mayor Washburn then addressed the fact that the residents of
Brookstone knew that at some time the roadways would continue
up the canyon and he stated that for the residents to say that
there should be no further traffic on the roadways is not fair
to any land owner next to the property. He stated that he is
concerned with regard to the traffic impact on the
neighborhoods. Mayor Washburn further stated that he would
like to see a reduction of homes along the ridgeline, if the
project goes forward, without affecting the standing oaks that
are on the site.
Councilwoman Cherveny again stated her concern with Condition
No. 47 and asked how many trips are generated now on Amorose
and Toft. The engineer for the applicant stated that there
are approximately 45 homes that use Amorose, which would
generate approximately 450 trips a day and there are
approximately 52 homes on Toft and the surrounding areas that
would generate 520 trips a day. He indicated that those
numbers would be at the terminus of the project and not at the
terminus of Toft and Amorose; which means that the first house
on Toft or the first house on Amorose is going to see 1,300
trips plus the 450 or 500 going which means 2,000 trips per
day. Councilwoman Cherveny then asked if this 1,300.stated in
the conditions was total on the streets or additional over the
trips already made. The engineer stated that they would be in
addition to the existing traffic. Mr. Stephens stated that
the developer is planning to develop his own access to the
tract and the current utilization of public streets will cease
when the other accesses are complete.
There was general discussion regarding ridgelines.
Councilman Alongi concurred with Mayor Washburn regarding
reduction of housing on the ridgeline.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY ALONGI TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT 92-3 OF LAGUNA HEIGHTS BASED ON THE FINDINGS, AND
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-52, APPROVE LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN
92-3 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, AND ADOPT
ORDINANCE NO. 964, AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-1 BASED ON
THE FINDINGS, AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-53.
Councilwoman Cherveny asked that it be included in the motion
to amend Condition No. 47 to: 800 vehicle trips per day.
Mayor Washburn asked that Condition No. 53 be added as part of
the motion to read as follows:
53. The maximum number of dwelling units allowed by the
Laguna Heights Specific Plan dated June 18, 1993 for the
Phase III area as identified on the Phasing Plan, Figure
36, of the Specific Plan, shall be reduced by a minimum
of ten percent (10~). The area is the prominent
ridgeline between Leach and McVicker Canyons and has a
land use designation of SAD-2 pursuant to the Specific
Plan. This density may be transferred to the Leach or
PAGE SI%TEEN - CITY COUNCIL MIN[JTE~ - SEPTEMBER 14y 1993
Dickey Canyon areas of the Specific Plan 'subject to the
review and approval of the Community Development Director
or their designed.
Councilman Dominguez agreed that the lowering of traffic to
S00 vehicles trips per day in Condition No. 47 and the
addition of Condition No. 53, be made part of the motion.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY A 4-0 VOTE WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING
TO APPROVE THE CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 92-3 OF
LAGUNA HEIGHTS BASED ON THE FINDINGS, AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-
52, LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN 92-3 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS AMENDED, AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 964, AND
APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-1 BASED ON THE FINDINGS, AND
ADOPT RESOLUTION NOe 93-53 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND
CONDITIONS.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 92-3 AND
ADOPTING THE FACTS, FINDINGS, AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSYDERATIONS AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REGARDING
THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN.
ORDYNANCE NO. 964
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CALYFORNYA, ADOPTING THE LAGUNA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN 92-3
(THE WESTERN COMPANY).
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ, WASHBURN
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENTe
NONE
ABSTA%N: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER
RESOLUTION NO. 93-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIAs MAKING AMENDMENT TO THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAI3
F'OR THE SECOND CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1993.
Findings - Specific Plan 92-3
1. The Laguna Heights Specific Plan meets the City~s
Specific Plan criteria for content and required
implementation of the General Plan established by
Section 65450 et sea. of the California Government
Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
2. The Laguna Heights Specific Plan is consistent witla
the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General
Plan and with any other applicable plans or
policies adopted by the City.
3. The Development Regulations contained within the
PAGE
- CITY COIINCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
Specific Plan supersede otherwise applicable City
ordinances and codes, unless specifically stated to
the contrary in the Specific Plan. Approval of the
Specific Plan shall not be interpreted as waiving
compliance with other Federal or State laws or City
codes.
4. This request will result in significant
environmental impacts associated with land use, air
quality, biological resources, energy resources,
aesthetics, agriculture, seismicity, water quality,
traffic school construction, utilities and services
which may be partially mitigated but are
anticipated to remain significant upon development
of the site as allowed under the General Plan.
These impacts are therefore found to be acceptable
under the General Plan, specifically the provision
of the quality housing opportunities by the City,
the anticipated increase in local government
revenues generated by project residents and the
provision of significant infrastructure
improvements, all of which are expected to support
local commercial and industrial development efforts
and generate measurable benefits to the local
economy and fiscal integrity of City government.
5. The proposed location of the plan allows the
development to be well-integrated with its
surroundings.
6. All vehicular traffic generated by the development,
either in phased increments or at full build-out,
will be accommodated safely and without causing
undue congestion upon adjoining streets.
7. Except as limited by State law, including SB 1287,
the Specific Plan identifies methodologies to allow
land use to be adequately serviced by existing or
proposed public facilities and services.
8. The overall design of the Specific Plan will
produce an attractive, efficient and stable
development.
9. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the
persons residing or working within the project area
or within the City, nor will it be injurious to
property or improvements in the project area or
within the City.
10. The Laguna Heights EIR has been prepared, submitted
and reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act and is
complete and adequate in that it addresses all
environmental effects of the project and
discretionary approvals.
Findings - Environmental Imnact Report 92-3
1. The Laguna Heights EIR and Addendum have been
EAGE EIGHTEEN -'CITY COUNCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 1$s 1993
prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act and is complete and adequate in that i~
addresses all environmental effects of the project
and discretionary approvals.
Findinas - General Plan Amendment 93-1
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish
a land use (Specific Plan) and allow density more
in keeping with ~he subject property's location,
access and site characteristics.
Conditions of Approval - Specific Plan 92-3
1. The text of the June 18, 1993 version of the Laguna
Heights Specific Plan shall be revised to
incorporate any corrections and revisions and any
~ypographical errors subsequent ~o their approval.
A final Specific Plan shall be submitted for review
and approval by the Community Development Director
or his designee within 30 days of approval by the
City Council. No permit shall be issued until
final administrative approval of the Specific Plan
by the Community Development Director or his
designee.
2. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the
Applicant shall submit a final grading plan,
subject to all requirements of the City Grading
Ordinance, and a geo-technical report to the Public
Services Director for approval. The geo-technical
report will primarily involve assessment of
potential soil-related constraints and hazards such
as slope stability, settlement, liquefaction, or
related seismic impacts where determined to be
appropriate by the Public Services Director. The
report shall also include evaluation of potentially
expansive soils and recommended construction
procedures and/or design criteria to minimize the
affects of these soils on the proposed development.
3. The grade for local streets shall generally not
exceed nine percent (9~) with the exception that
grades up to a maximum of fifteen percent (15~)
will be considered because of design constraints
with the approval of the City Engineer.
4. Grading shall not be permitted outside the area of
the designated project boundary unless appropriate
approvals have been obtained.
5. Prior fo the recordation of a final tract/parcel
map or prior to the issuance of any grading
permits, whichever comes first, the Applicant shall
design the following improvements and provide
necessary dedication in a manner meeting the
approval o~ the Public Services Director:
* All provisions for surface drainage; and
* All necessary storm drain facilities to a
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COONCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993 -
satisfactory point of disposal for the proper
control and disposal of storm runoff.
6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, grading and
construction plans shall incorporate erosion
control raeasures.
7. All open space and slopes outside the public right-
of-way shall be owned and maintained by either the
master homeowner's association or private owners.
All open space areas owned bg the homeowner~s
association shall be offered for irrevocable
dedication to the City.
8. All structures shall be designed to incorporate all
state and local water conservation regulations,
subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director.
9. Applicants shall incorporate energy-efficient
features and passive design concepts, whenever
feasible, in the design and construction of the
project.
10. Applicants shall incorporate the use of solar
energy and waste heat recovery systems to reduce
energy consumption into the project design.
11. Applicants shall consult with SCE and SCG in the
selection of effective energy conservation
techniques and the installation of additional,
project-related infrastructure.
12. Applicants shall install building and energy
conservation measures in compliance with Title 24,
CRC Sections 2-5307 (b) and 2.5452 (i) and (j), and
Title 20, CRC Sections 1604 (f) and 1601 (b).
13. The development shall include facilities to promote
circulation efficiencies, such as bus stops and
turnouts. Plans for these facilities shall be
incorporated into the street improvement plans for
.each development phase.
14. All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound
attenuated against present and projected noise
which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the
Project so as not to exceed an exterior standard of
60 Ldn in outdoor livinq areas, and an interior
standard of 45 Db CNEL in all habitable rooms.
15. The design of the Laguna Heights project shall meet
all Riverside County Fire Department standards for
fire protection and any additional requirements
requested by the County Fire Marshall.
16. All development proposals shall be reviewed by the
City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County Fire
Department to ensure that adequate fire services
are available to serve the development.
PAGE TWENTY - CIT% COIINCIL MINIITEB - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
17. Applicant shall obtain all necessary State and
Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements,
where applicable, prior to each phase of
development of the project.
18. The City's Noise Ordinance must be me~ during a11
site preparation activity.
19. Developer shall participate in the City of Lake
Elsinore City-wide Landscaping and Street Lighting
District pursuant to Resolution 88-27.
20. Applicants of future projects within the Laguna
Heights Specific Plan area shall acquire the
necessary permits for development, including
grading and building permits.
21. Prior to approval of each tentative map, a fault
hazards investigation shall be conducted which will
include fault trenching and utilize precursory
geophysical methods within areas enclosed by the
State of California Special Studies maps, if any
structures are proposed in or near these areas.
This study shall be provided by the Applicant.
22. Documentation of slope stability shall be required
when the type of fill material has been determined
to issuance of a grading permit. All cut and fill
grading shall be done under the supervision of a
geo-technical engineer.
23. All Public Works requirements shall be complied
with as a condition of development as specified in
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map
approval.
24. Prior to ~.enf.ative map approval, the project
geotechnical, civil, and structural engineers shall
review seismic design parameters and incorporate
appropriate design standards into the site plan.
25. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant
shall develop a Spi11 Prevention, Containment and
Cleanup Plan for potential accidental spills of
petroleum prevention products from machinery or
above ground storage tanks during construction.
26. Applicants for individual projects requiring 401
Water Quality Certification an NPDES construction
and storm water permits shall obtain such permits
prior to issuance of City grading permits.
27. All construction equipment shall utilize properly
working mufflers and be kept in a proper state of
tune to alleviate backfires. Stationary equipraent
such as generators, shall be equipped with noise
shrouds and shall be placed as far as possible from
sensitive receptor locations. Finally, when
working within sensitive areas, portable noise
barriers shall be utilized to reduce produced noise
PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COIINCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
to the extent feasible. construction activity
shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Saturday to protect adjacent
occupants from unreasonable noise and glare
associated with construction.
28. Contractors shall implement the measures to reduce
the impacts of exhaust and dust emissions during
construction.
29. Diversion, obstruction of the natural flow, or
changes in the bed, channel, or bank of any river,
stream, or lake shall require notification to the
CDF as called for in the Fish and Game Code.
Notification shall be made after the project is
approved by the lead agency.
30. Recycled water shall be utilized where feasible.
Where implemented, recycled water shall be sued in
accordance with Title 22, California Administrative
Code and is also subject to the requirements and
specifications of the Riverside County Health
Department, EVMWD and the RWQCB through issuance of
an NPDES waste discharge permit.
31. Prior to approval of the first tentative tract map
filed for property within the Specific Plan,
applicant shall have entered into a school impact
mitigation agreement with the school district.
City shall have considered the adequacy of the
school facilities or available means of financing
school facilities to meet the needs and demands of
new development proposed in such tentative map to
be approved by the City. For purpose of this
condition, acceptable mitigation provided for in
the School Impact Mitigation Agreement may include,
but is not limited to the following: (a)
Utilization of developer fees, Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District financing or other special
district financinq, singly or in combination, to
fully fund the construction cost of school
facilities necessitated by the proposed
development. (b) Payment or credit toward school
fee mitigation to be provided to the landowner for
the acquisition of a school site located on such
landowner's property.
32. Applicant shall ensure adequate utility service
prior to occupancy.
33. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable
measures as specified by the City including those
found in the City programs including the City
Source Reduction and Recycling Element and
Household Hazardous Waster Element, the County
Solid Waste Management Plan and new County
Integrated Waste Management Plan.
34. Submit a letter of verification (will-serve) to the
City Engineering Department, from the applicable
water district, stating water and sewer
PAGE TWENTY-TiPO - CITY COUNCIL MINOTEB - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
arrangements have been macle for this project and
all sewer and water easements shall be secured
prior to final map approval.
35. Applicant shall provide all project-related on-site
improvements as specified in the Specific Plan.
36. The use of some native vegetation shall be
incorporated into landscaping. Native
Bunchgrasses, wild buckwheat, and coastal sagebrush
are examples of native grassland and coastal safe
scrub species that shall be utilized so as to
create as diverse a plan palette as feasible.
Implementation of this measure would partially
mitigate for unavoidable impacts of the project on
natural vegetation in the area.
37. All future development including ~entative
subdivision maps shall be consistent with the
design standards and guidelines proposed in the
Specific Plan.
38. All future development is subject to the City of
Lake Elsinore Design Review process.
39. The Applicant will work with EVMWD to ensure that
there is an adequate supply af water and pressure
to meet fire flow requirements. All water mains
and hydrants shall be provided in accordance with
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, subject to
the approval of the Riverside county Fire
Department.
40. The approvecl Final Specific Plan shall be filed in
the office of the City Clerk and in the City
Planning Division.
41. No building shall be constructed, maintained or
used other than for the purpose specified in the
approved Final Specific Plan as required
hereinafter.
42. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City
on a project-by-project basis. If determined
necessary by the Community Development Director or
designee, additional environmental analysis will be
required.
43. All habi~at resources planned for removal,
preservation, creation, or enhancement are subject
~o the review and permit issuance of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Sections 1601-1603 of the State Department of Fish
and Game, where these Agencies have jurisdiction.
Copies of all permits (404 ancl 1603) and conditions
attached to the permits shall be submitted to the
Community Development Director or designee for
review prior to the removal of any habitat.
44. Applican~ shall comply with the City's approved
PAGE TWENTY-THREE-- CZTY COIINCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
landscaping
approval of
landscaping
and adjaceni
Landscaping
irrigation
Engineering
Architect.
standards in effect at the time of
this Specific Plan with respect to the
in medians, parkways, expanded parkways
slopes to be maintained by the City of
Maintenance District. Landscaping and
plans shall be approved by he
Department and City~s Landscape
45. Except as otherwise provided in the Specific Plan
or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer,
roadway standards for Lake Elsinore relating to the
minimum local street radii, maximum cul-de-sac
length, maximum grade and minimum sidewalk width
must be followed.
46. Developer shall comply with all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program
adopted with the Laguna Heights Country Club Final
Environmental Impact Report 92-3.
47. Prior to buildinc~ permit issuance, the applicant
shall conduct traffic evaluation/traffic counts to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to
building permits being issued which would generate
more that 800 vehicle trips per day from the
Laguna Heights project on either Toft Drive or
Amorose Street, the applicant shall develop and
improve and alternative access to the site
acceptable to the City. Once an acceptable
alternative access is determined an Amendment to
the Laguna Heights Specific Plan shall be submitted
to the City for review and approval that integrates
the alternative access in with the Specific Plan.
48. The minimum lot size for the SFD-3 (Canyon Lots),
residential land use designation within the Laguna
Heights Specific Plan shall be one half (1/2) acre
(21,780 square feet), and the final Specific Plan
document shall be revised to reflect this.
49. The keeping of horses as an accessory use in the
, SFD-3 land use designation of the Laguna Heights
Specific Plan shall be subject to all of the
requlation as set forth in Section 17.20.120 of the
City of Lake Elsinore's Zoning Code. The final
Specific Plan shall be revised to reflect these
regulations. Tentative tract maps for the SFD-3
areas shall provide for equestrian trails for
access to the equestrian properties and regional
trails.
50. The proposed equestrian center as referenced in the
Laguna Heights Specific Plan is outside the
boundaries of the Specific Plan and therefore
subject to separate review and approval.
51. The project drainage plans shall include a system
of retention basins within the project site that
will control the amount of storm water released
from the site so that the maximum flow never
exceeds the flows form the natural conditions.
PAGE'TWENTY-FOIIR'= CITY COONCIL MIN[TTES -.SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
52. Construction vehicles shall be prohibited from
using Toft Drive or Amorose Street at any time.
Proposed Laguna Heights Drive South shall be rough
graded in the initial grading phase to provide
construction access to the project site. Once
plans are developed for this alternative access
they will have to be reviewed and approved by the
City pursuant to Condition No. 47.
53. The maximum number of dwelling units allowed by the
Laguna Heights Specific Plan dated June 18, 1993,
for the Phase III area as identified on the phasing
plan, Figure 36, of the Specific Plan shall be
reduced by a minimum of ten'percent (10~). the
area is the prominent ridgeline between Leach and
McVicker Canyons and has a land use designation of
RFD-2 pursuant to the Specific Plan. This density
may be transferred to the Leach or Dickey Canyon
areas of the Specific Plan subject to the review
and approval of the Community Development Director
or their designee.
BUSINESS ITEMS
31. Extension of Time Reauests for North Tuscanv Tentative Tract
Mabs: 25074. 25075, 25076, 25077, 25078, 25079, 25080
(Homestead Land Development Companvl. (F:160.2)
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO APPROVE TAE EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 25074~ 25075~ 25076, 25077~ 250780
25079, 25080 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS AMENDED.
Councilwoman Cherveny noted that the developer has not
complied with the conditions to date and indicated that she
would not be in support of an extension without more
compliance. She expressed particular concern with paving of
walkways to the school on Summerhill.
City Attorney Harper clarified that the applicant currently
has no economic ability to perform the conditions. He
explained that the question is really whether to extend the
map and keep it a saleable item or not extend the map and have
is raw land which would most likely limit the market for the
property. He indicated that there was not really a downside
to the extension, as the project might proceed.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the potential of someone
acquiring the property and proceeding with the project. Mr.
Harper indicated that the chance is very good, as there are
interested buyers.
Councilman Alongi requested confirmation that the conditions
will stand with the extension of time.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the ability to adci a
condition, because she would like to see paving on Summerhil3
out to the School.
Mayor Washburn clarified that there is already a condition fox
paving fhis area.
PAGE TWENTY-FIVE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES -
14, 1993
John Mullick, representing Homestead, noted that the area
under discussion has been bladed off to allow a walkway to
school. He explained that the property is under the control
of the R.T.C. and no expenditures can currently be made for
improvement, only maintenance.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether the applicant could
pave the area. Mr. Mullick indicated that he was not certain
this would be possible.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether the applicant would
agree to adding a condition regarding this. Mr. Mullick
indicated that the sidewalk is already conditioned and will
eventually go in. City Attorney Harper clarified that the
project can only be finaled when all conditions are complete.
Councilman Alongi questioned the City's ability to put down an
inch of asphalt temporarily to prevent problems durinq the
rainy season. He then indicated that he would like the City
to lay 1-1/2" asphalt.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez inquired whether this would be
acceptable to the applicant. Mr. Mullick indicated it would
be acceptable. City Attorney Harper clarified that the City
does not own the property, but could incur liability from this
action.
Councilman Alongi stressed the safety concerns for children in
the area. He questioned the ability of the City to loan funds
or supplies to the developer. City Attorney Harper indicated
that he was not certain what would be allowed by the R.T.C.,
but it could be investigated.
THE FOREGOING MOTION TO APPROVE A 24 MONTH EXTENSION OF TIME
CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.
Findinas
1. Satisfactory progress toward the development of
these Tract Maps has taken place.
2. Conditions have been added by the Engineering and
.Planning Departments to insure the development will
not impact the public health, safety and welfare.
3. The Project as proposed and conditioned is
consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives
of the General Plan and the Tuscany Hills Specific
Plan.
Conditions
NOTE: The following conditions apply to all eight
Tentative Tract Maps except as otherwise annotated
before each applicable condition as follows:
(74) applicable only to TT 25074
(75) applicable only to TT 25075
(76) applicable only to TT 25076
(77) applicable only to TT 25077
(78) applicable only to TT 25078
PAGE TWENTY-BIS - CITY COIINCIL MINIITEB - SEPTEMBER 14,-5993`
(79) applicable only to TT 25079
(80) applicable only to TT 25080
(83) applicable only to TT 24383
Planning Debar~men~ Conditions
2. Tentative Tract Maps 25074, 25078, 25076, 25077,
25080 and 24383 shall expire two (2) years from
date of approval unless extended pursuant to State
and Local Law or recordation of final map occurs.
2. Applicant shall comply with development standards
as outlined in the approved Specific Plan.
3. Final plotting and architectural drawings shall
require minor design review as required by he
Tuscany Hills Specific Plan.
4. Applicant shall record CC & R's for the tract
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers, and trucks over one-ton capacity, roof
mounted or front yard microwave satellite antennas.
The CC & R's shall be approved by the Community
Development Director prior to recordation of final
map.
5. All signage shall be consistent with the Sign
Program contained in the Specific Plan.
6. The dimensions of all residential lots shown on the
Final Tract Map shall comply with the minimum
standards established in the Specific Plan.
7, Street names for all streets within the Tentative
Map shall be approved by the Community Development
Director.
Engineerinq Department Conditions
(75) 8e "H" Street shall be re-evaluated along with "A"
Street in TT 25077 in order to improve access off
Summerhill Drive. Redesign shall be approved by
Engineering Department if design proves to be more
feasible.
(77) 9. "A" Street shall be re-evaluated to provide
possible access somewhere between Lots 164 and 167.
Redesign shall be approved by City Engineering
Department.
10. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or
building permits, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and
shall return the executed original to the Coanmunity
Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
il. Fence locations and walls indicated on a grading
plan and consistent with the Specific Plan sriall be
approved by he Community Development Director
PAGE TWENTY-SEVEN -'CITY COUNCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
prior to the release of the first Certificate of
Occupancy.
12. Grading and construction plans shall incorporate
erosion control measures as required by he Chief
Building Official.
13. Improvement Plans, including sewer, water and
drainage shall be approved prior to the Final Map
approval.
14. Grading plans for this subdivision shall comply
with the grading objectives and guidelines
established in the Specific Plan.
15. All Public Works required shall be complied with as
a condition of development as specified in the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code at the time a building
permit is issued.
16. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 15, Chapter 16.34;
Resolution 85-26).
17. Submit a letter of verification "will-serve" letter
to the City Engineering Department, from the
applicable water district, stating water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project prior
to final map approval.
18. Construct all required off-site public works
improvements per approved plans (Municipal Code,
Title 12); plans must be approved and signed by the
City Engineer prior to final map approval.
19. Intersectinq streets on the inside radius of a
curve will only be permitted when adequate sight
distance is verified by a registered engineer.
20. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of public works off-site improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution No. 83-78).
21. Provide street lighting and indicate on street
improvement plans as required by the City Engineer.
22. Annex to the City Landscaping and Street Lighting
District.
23. Prior to the recordation of the final tract map,
all public improvements shall be designed and
constructed or bonded for in accordance with plans
and specifications meeting the approval of the City
Engineer and the Chief Building Official as amended
by he Specific Plan.
24. All local interior double loaded streets shall be
fifty foot (50') right-of-way with thirty-six foot
(36') curb-to-curb. Restricted single-loaded local
PAGE TWENTY-EIGHT - CITY COIINCIL MZNIITES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
streets shall not be less than forty foot (40~)
right-of--way with twen~y-eight foot (28') curb-to-
curb.
25. A complete hydrology and hydraulic report shall be
submitted and approved by he City Engineer prior to
Final Map approval.
26. The storm drain system shall be designed to
mitigate urban pollutants from discharge into
Canyon Lake and San Jacinto River as amended by the
Specific Plan.
27. Any natural drainage diverted or concentrated onto
adjacent property will require a letter of drainage
acceptance from the affected property owner.
28a No single-family lots shall front or access to
collector streets or higher volume streets.
29. Designated natural open space lots shall be offered
for dedication to the City and maintained to
prevent any public hazard until such offer is
accepted. Operation and maintenance of open space
shall be provided through the City of Lake Elsinore
Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District or a
similar entity. The City may require that an
appropriate strip of land along the boundary of
residential lots (consistent with the Fire
Management Proqram set forth in the Specific Plan)
be maintained by a homeowner's association. Access
for maintenance to be approved by the City Engineer
prior to recordation.
30. All compaction reports, grade certifications,
monument certifications (with tie-notes delineated
on 8-1/2° x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department before final inspection of
off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
(78) 31. °1A1° Street from "B'0 to ~°C'° Street shall be
increased to fifty feet (50').
Building/Safety Department
(75) 32. Construction Phasing Plan will be submitted to
(77) Chief Building Official and approved prior to the
(79) issuance of building permits within references
tentative tract maps.
33. Applicant shall meet all Conditions of approval
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and release of utilities.
34. Prior to the issuance of building permits as
landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the City. The plans shall be
subject to the guidelines identified in the
Specific Plan and Design Guidelines for Tuscany
Hills.
PAGE TWENTY-NINE - CITY COIINCIL MIN[TTES - BEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
35. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the
Riverside County Fire Department for fire
protection as determined by the community
Development Director
36. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant
shall provide assurance that all required fees to
the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been
paid.
37. All structures shall be designed to incorporate all
state and local water conservation regulations,
subject to the approval of the Chief Building
Official.
38. All buildings shall be constructed with fire
retardant roofing materials as described in Section
3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood
shingles or shakes shall have a Class "A" rating
and shall be approved by the Chief Building
Official prior to installation.
39. Submit a schedule of public works improvements
based upon the timing of occupancy of the tract
prior to final map approval.
(74) 40. Residential lots of less than 5,000 square feet
shall be subject tot he approval of the Planning
Commission.
(79) 41.- The "C" Street intersection with Greenwald Avenue
should be re-evaluated and submitted for approval
by the Community Development Director prior to the
recordation of Tract 25079.
42. All improvement plans shall be digitized. At
Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall submit
tapes and/or discs which are compatible with the
City's ARC/INFO GIS system or the developer all pay
$1,000.00 per sheet for City digitizing.
43. If grading exceeds 50 cubic years, grading plans
,:shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved
prior to final map approval. Prior to any grading,
the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and
post appropriate security.
44. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits,
the owner shall provide the City with proof of
filing a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board for a National Pollutant
Discharge System Permit.
45. Developer shall provide the City with proof that it
will provide No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs
for streets within the tracts or pay a fee for
installation by the City.
46. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement
markers int he street at all fire hydrant
locations.
EAGE°TSIRTY - CITY°COIINCIL MINUTEB --SEPTEMBER 14~ 8993
47. Developer shall be subject to all Master Planned
drainage fees and will receive credit for all
Master Planned drainage facilities construction.
48. The Developer shall establish a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Program prior to fifty percent
(50~) occupancy. The program shall include, but
not be limited to, stenciling catch basins,
pamphlets for irrigation and fertilizing lawns and
disposal of auto oil and anti-freeze.
32. Evaluation of Refuse Collection ancl Street Sweebinq
Operations. CR&R. Inc. (F:163.1)(X:68.1)
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO REVOKE THE NOTICE OF
DEFAULT FOR CR & R, INC.
City Manager Molendyk indicated that Mr. Fahrion of CR & R,
and City staff have worked to alleviate the prior concerns and
~here is a no~iceable improvemen~.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he hoped this improved level
of service would con~inue.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRYED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.
33.
Street. (F:68.1)
City Manager Molendylc noted the location and reminded Council
that this intersection has been under discussion for quite
some time.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE TIiE AGREEMENT AS PRESENTED.
34. Street Name Chanae - Railroad Canvon Road to Diamond Drive.
(F:158.1)
City Manager Molendyk explained this item and advised that it
would be approximately a one year process to gain a Caltrans
permit and allow for the freeway signs to be changed.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED
WITH THE NAME CHANGE BY REQUESTING COMMENTS FROM ALL PROPERTY
OWNERS ALONG RAILROAD CANYON ROAD~ NOTIFY CALTRANS AND BEGIN
COLLECTING COSTS OF SIGNING CHANGES) SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE~ AND
BRING BACK A RESOLUTION TO COUNCIL EFFECTING THE CHANGE AND SETTING
A DATE FOR THE ACTUAL IMPLEMENTATION.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether this change would be
both Nor~h and South of the freeway. Mr. Molendyk indicated
that it would run from City limits to the Stadium.
Councilwoman Cherveny e~tpressed concern with the cost to the
businesses on the North side of the freeway and noted that
only one would be impacted South of the freeway.
Mayor Washburn noted the necessary public hearing process.
City Manager Molendyk indicated that staff could find out how
PAGE THIRTY-ONE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
many businesses are affected.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.
35. Rectuests from Non-Profit Oraanizations. (F:108.1)
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO APPROVE ASSISTANCE TO
THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:
H.O.P.E.
Operation School Bell
Friends of the Library
Councilman Alongi indicated that
funds for the Friends of the
suggested an increase of $1,000,
$1,000 from Operation School Bell.
$5,000
$5,000
$1,000
he would like to see more
Library if possible, and
possibly by transferring
Mayor Pro Tem Dominquez suggested $500 be shifted from
H.O.P.E. and $500 from Operation School Bell.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE, A SUBSEQUENT MOTION TO APPROVE ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$4,500 TO H.O.P.E., $4,500 TO OPERATION SCHOOL BELL AND $2,000 TO
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRRY.
36. Interstate 15 Access Studv. (F:82.2)
City Manager Molendyk suggested that this item be referred to
a workshop for discussion.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO DEFER THIS ITEM TO A CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR DISCUSSION.
37. Council Policy - Church Conditional Use Permit Fees. (F:120.1)
City Manager Molendyk suggested that this item be referred to
a workshop for discussion.
MOVED BY CHERVENY~ SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUB
VOTE TO DEFER THIS ITEM TO A CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR DISCUSSION.
PIIHLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
John Johnson, Lake Elsinore Valley Soccer Club, 31946 St. Pierre
Ln., thanked Council for the use of Summer Lake Park and presented
Council with T-shirts, hats and patches of their first annual
Friendship Tournament which was held on Labor Day weekend. He
requested a variance for parking on Grand Avenue for Saturdays
only, to allow for games held at that site.
Councilman Winkler commented that there is no parking on Grand
Avenue due to bicycle lanes; and he stated that he felt that
because of traffic and visibility in that area, it is not safe to
park on Grand Avenue. ,He stated that it endanqers the children if
they try and cross, and further it blocks vision for the cars
trying to turn left from Broadway Street. Mr. Winkler explained
that the park was designed with extra parking in the area of the
portable classrooms and eventually it will be used for parking. He
suggested areas for alternate parking and encouraged Mr. Johnson to
have the parents park in other areas which are safer for the
PAGE THIRTY-TWO - CITY"COIINCIL M%NQTES-- SEPTEMSER 84~ Y993
children. He asked that staff work with the Soccer Club and with
Captain Daniel to address this problem.
Kelly Butler, Elsinore Valley Friends Church, 22971 Fawn Lake,
Canyon Lake, requested that when the Conditional Use Permits for
churches are considered, that the Council consider small churches
that do not have a great deal of funds to work with. He further
reques~ed that Council allow them to practice their religion and
stressed their need for a permanent facility. Mayor Washburn asked
how many are in the congregation. Mr. Butler stated that they have
approximately 15o members and are currently meeting at Terra Cotta
Junior High.
Peter Dawson, Southshore Homeowners Association, 18010 Grand
Avenue, expressed his concerns regarding the lake and presented
pic~ures de~ailing the con~inuing problem of algae in the lake. He
stated that he saw evidence of copper sulfate being used in the
inlet channel and flood plain next to the levee. He asked why
copper sulfite is still being used, since it is counter-productive
to the health of the lake and destructive to the micro-organisms.
City Manager Molendyk explained that Council authorized staff to
use copper sulfite along the shorelines to kill algae initially.
He further explained that other than the two applications used in
the beginning of the micro-treatment, the City has not continued
~hat ~reatment. Mr. Molendyk expressed concern and indicated that
the City would like to know who is using this treatment since the
City is using Micro-organisms only. Mayor Washburn asked if stagf
could investigate to see where this problem is being created.
Thelma Ball, 15682 Grand Avenue, Sp. 22, e~cpressed her concerns
regarding the Senior Center and the need for table and chairs and
a horse-shoe pito She commented that there are two air
conditioners in the Center that have not worked right for some time
and asked Council to direct staff to have them repaired. Mrs. Ball
stated that the Seniors do get bottled water, but the City does not
provide drinking cups and they were promised a drinking fountain
which has not been provided. She asked for an accounting of the
£unds which were appropriated for the Center and asked that the
City relocate the pool table to a safer location.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk reminded the Council/RDA Board of the Press
Conference scheduled for tomorrow. He announced to the public that
season ticket information is now available at (909) 245-HITS.
CITY COIINCIL COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez commentecl on the followingo
i) Crime problems downtown; inquired whether the tarqet team
or bicycle patrols are being used. He noted that
panhandling problems are increasing, groups are
congregating at Peck Street, and trucks are using Main
Street. He requested that Captain Daniel address these
concerns.
Councilman Winkler commented on the followings
1) Soccer Club concerns, requested that staff work with the
organization for solutions to parking.
PAGE THIRTY-THREB - CITY COIINCIL MIN[JTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
2) Amber Ridge, met with Water District members.
Documentation was to be issued on September 23rd, however
paperwork was delayed. Requested that staff contact Mro
Hoagland and determine the problem and have the City~s
lobbyist assist in Sacramento where possible.
3) McVicker Park, recommended that staff contact the Flood
Control District to expedite the plan check.
Councilman Alongi commented on the,following:
1) Congratulated L.E.A.F. for its work and accomplishments,
2) Sun Tribune Editor Hand, noted that he has spoken with
his supervisor. He stressed the need for opinions to
include factual information, as he has no right to
mislead the readers.
3) H.O.P.E. Dinner, reminded the Community that it will be
held on September 25th at the Community Center.
Interested parties can contact H.O.P.E. for tick.~ts.
4) Ordinance regarding Drug Houses, happy it is in pl~ce and
being used.
5) Concerns about Horseshoe Pit at Senior Center. He
questioned the cost and timing for completion.
6) Made a personal request for the Chamber of Commerce to
consider allowing the use of the Rodeo grouncZ~ for the
Sierra Circuit Rodeo. He noted his understanding of the
conflict and stressed the need to do what is good for the
Community.
Councilwoman Cherveny commented on the followings
1) L.E.A.F., commended the reduction in euthanization
statistics and the increase in adoptionso
2) Inquired when the July 4th banners would come down and
the Autumnfest banners would go up.
3) Questioned the Horseshoe Pits and the target date for
completion. Community Services Director Sapp explained
the difficulties in the approval process and indicated
that the final bid documents should be ready this week.
Mrs. Cherveny suggested that groundbreaking ceremonies be
held for this project.
4) Noted copy of book received from Marge Rieder, and
advised that Ms. Rieder will be on the Larry King Show on
September 29th and the Joan Rivers Show in October. She
thanked Ms. Rieder for the book.
5) Announced the 3rd Annual Juried Art Show on September
18th and 19th, co-sponsored by the City and the Elsinore
Valley Artists Society. She encouraged the Community to
attend.
Mayor Washburn commented on the following:
1) Thanked Marge Rieder for the copy of her book.
PAGE THIRTY-FOIIR - CITY COONCIL MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 14~ 1993
2) Concurred that Wes~ern Classic Productions and the
Chamber of Commerce have come a long way and stressed the
potential for cooperation. Ae expressed his hope that a
joint use of the rodeo grounds can be negotiated.
CLOSED SES3ION
TAE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 10:05
P.M. TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION WITH TAYLOR-SHAFER, POTENTIAL
LITIGATION AND PERSONNEL MATTERS.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 10:40 P.M. NO ACTION TAKEN.
MOVED BY WYNKLER, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CI COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:41 P.MD
~ ~~`Z~
GARG~ WA HBURN, MAYOR
CIT F LAKE ELSINORE
?~ TESTe
~~~ ,
'JICKY KASAD, ...I'PY CLERK
~ITY' OF LAB ~' EI.SINORE