HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-13-1993 City Council MinutesMINIITES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LARE ELSINORE
31315 CHANEY STREET
LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA
TIIESDAY~ JOLY 13~ 1993
s****,e******te*a*******r*rr*rrr****~rrrrr~r*r:******r******r**•
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor
Washburn at 7:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Winkler.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILM%MS3EE2S: fiLONGI, CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ,
WINKLER, WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEI4BER5: NONE
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, City Attorney Harper, Administrative Services Director
Boone, Community Development Manager Shear, City Planner Leslie,
Community Services Manager Best, Engineering Manager O~Donnell,
Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Pape and
City Clerk Kasad.
PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
A. Presentation - Hugh Walker. (F:56.1)
Mayor Washburn commented on Mr, wal~ter's work during the
County Centennial Ce3_ebratien planning and explained that Mr.
Walker represented the City on ~he County's Centennial
Commission. In addition, he noted the contributions of Mrs.
Walker to the same work. He detailed Mr. Walker's ongoing
contributions to the Community over a long period of time
including business owner, Planning Commissioner, City Council
Member and School Board Member.
Mr. Walker thanked the Council for this recognition and noted
that the Commission would continue to meet for approximately
two more months in follow-up to the celebration.
B. Lake Update Video. (F:92.1)
Staff showed a video detailing the increasing use of Micro-
organisms such as have been used in the Lake.
PIIBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS
Requests were received to address the following items and deferred
to the appropriate time on the agenda:
Item Nos. 10, 13, 21 and 22.
PAGE TWO - CZTY COIINCIL MINOTE~ - JULY 13~ 1993
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Pollowing items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for
further discussion and consideration:
Item Nos. 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10.
MOVED BY CHERVENYo SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF
4 TO 0, WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE
CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. Special Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting -
June 3, 1993. (F:44.4)
b. Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - June 15, 1993.
(F:44.4)
c. Adjourned Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency
Meeting - June 18, 1993. (F:44.4)
d. Regular City Council Meeting - June 22, 1993. (F:44.4)
e. Adjourned Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency
Meeting ° June 29, 1993. (F:44.4)
2. Received and ordered filed the Building Activity Report for
June, 1993. (F:32.4)
3. Received and ordered filed the Code Enforcement Activity
Report for June, 1993. (F:54.1)
4. Received and ordered filed the Ynvestment Report for June 30,
1993. (F:12.5)
6. Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator the Claim
Against the City submitted by Amaro Construction (CL #93-13).
(F:52.2)
11. Approved outlet Channel/Riverside County Flood Control
District Request for Lease of Property; authorized staff to
negotiate a lease for the City owned parcel, adjacent to
Crowbar Wrecking, for a term to expire in 1996. In addition,
the parcel is to be screened, fenced and meet any additional
conditions currently placed on the business before the site is
to be used. (F:68.1)
12o Approved Proclamation for State Tourism Month - July, 1993.
(F:122.1)
13. Approved Public Hearing Date of July 27, 1993, for the
followinge
a. Specific Plan 92-3, Environmental Impact Report 92-1,
General Plan Amendment 93-1 and Annexation No. 62 - Good
Land Investment - The Western Company (K.S. Chen).
(F:150.2)
YTEMS PIILLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAIt
5. Warrant List - June 30. 1993. (F:12.3)
Councilwoman Cherveny requested a breakdown and status of the
Lake Enterprise Fund. Administrative Services Director Boone
PAGE THREE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - JIILY 13~ 1993
advised that a memo was presented to Council for clarification
and detailed the warrants issued relating to the Lake.
Councilman Alongi inquired whether it would be possible to
provide separate accounting for this fund. Mr. Boone
indicated that he could provide a separate listing similar to
that provided for Community Facilities District 88-3.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
0 WITH ABSTAINING TO RATIFY THE WARRANT LIST AS PRESENTED.
7.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO
0 WITH WASHBURN AND WINKLER ABSTAINING TO GRANT A TWENTY FOUR MONTH
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25171 AND TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 26459 WHICH SHALL EXPIRE SEPTEMBER 24, 1995, BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL:
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25171 & 26459
1. Substantial progress toward the development of this
Tract Map has taken place.
2. Conditions have been added by the Engineering and
Planning Departments to insure the development will
not impact public health, safety and welfare
3. The project as proposed and conditioned is
consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives
of the General Plan.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 25171 REVISED AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26459
Plannina Division
1. Tentative Tract Map 25171 Revised and Tentative
Tract Map 26459 are approved subject to the
approval of General Plan Amendment 91-4 and Zone
Change 91-6.
2. Tentative Tract Map 251717 Revised and 26459 will
expire two (2) years from date of approval unless
an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake
Elsinore City Council in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act.
3. Signage for this subdivision shall require City
Permits.
4e Prior to the recordation of any final tract map,
Councilwoman Cherveny indicated that she pulled items 7 and 8
to determine whether any fees were due the City on these
projects. Administrative Services Director Boone indicated
that there were no fees due.
PAGE FOOR - CITY COQNCIL MINUTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
applicant shall have entered into a school impact
mitigation agreement with the school district, or
prior to recordation of any final tract map ~he
project shall have been included within the
formation of CFD 91-1 to be formed by School
District at its cost, or annexed to CFD 91-1 to be
formed by School District at its cost, or annexed
to CFD 91-1 subsequent to its formation. City
shall have considered the adequacy of the school
facilities or available means of financing school
facilities to meet the needs and demand of new
development proposed in such tentative map to be
approved by the Cityo
5. Street names within the subdivision shall be
approved by the Planning Division.
6. Bicycle lanes and bus turnouts are to be provided
subject to the requirements of the Community
Services Director or his clesignee.
7. Provide fire buffer zone around entire tract
perimeter and landscape for fire retardant and
erosion control as required by the Riverside County
Fire Department and the Planning Manager.
8o The applicant shall provide connection to public _
sewer gor each lot within the subdivision. No
service laterals shall cross adjacent property
lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer
plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD.
9. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the
construction phase of this project shall require a
bond and be subject to approval of the Planning
Manaqer or designee, prior to issuance of grading
permit.
10. Tfie developer shall establish a Homeowners
Association prior to Final Map to manage and impose
fees to maintain all slopes, common areas, open
space, private drainage facilities, grounds,
private streets and any other common amenities.
This association shall be established subject to
current State laws and be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney and Planning Manager or
desiqnee who shall review all CC & R's and rules
for their adequacy and completeness. The City
Attorney shall review CC & R's, homeowners
association documents and all documents to convey
title to the FIOmeowners Association.
11. Subdivider shall record CC & R~s for the project
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacitye CC
& Ros shall also include screening any ground base
disk and no roof-mounted or front yard disk shall
be allowed. CC & R's shall be subject to the
PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 13~ 1993
approval of the Planning Manager and the City
Attorney, prior to recordation o any deeds or
final map. CC &°s shall be recorded prior to
issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the
units when developed in the future.
12. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor
plans, landscaping and fences/walls shall require
Minor Design Review approval prior to issuance of
building permits. The model complex must provide
off-street parking and one model must incorporate
xeriscape landscaping with identifying signage.
All standards of development and procedural steps
in effect at the Minor Design Review submittal
shall apply for this project.
13. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are
required. The applicant shall bond 120~ for
material and labor for one (1) year for erosion
control landscaping at the time the site is rough
graded.
14. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or buildinq
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete and
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development
Department.
15. All project mitigation measures, as specified by
the adopted EIR and its mitigation monitoring
program is required to be implemented into the
project in accordance with the times specified in
the mitigation monitoring program as amended by
these conditions of approval.
16. A noise analysis to determine noise impacts of
proposed Elsinore Ridge Road is required prior to
final map.
17. Developer shall participate in a Mello-Roos
financing District or other financing mechanism for
the Railroad Canyon - Interstate 15 fire station
facility. Proof of participation is required prior
to Final Map.
18. Additional environmental review in accordance with
the CEQA quidelines is required prior to Final Map
approval for the construction of any off-site
roads.
19. Prior to final map an agreement between State Fish
and Game and the Army Corps of Engineers for
section 1600 and 404 permits shall be obtained for
impacts to the blue line watercourse and Mulefat
Scrub habitat.
20. Prior to issuance of grading permits shall pay any
required Stephen's Kangaroo Rat fees of the species
habitat conservation program.
21. A focused spring survey to determine sensitive
EAGE S2R - CITY COIIIJCIL MINIITES - JUL% 13~ 1993
plant species prior to final map is required.
Future mitigation may include avoidance (site
redesign), transplanting, purchase of occupied
habitat, propagation programs etc..., and/or as
xecoanmended by State Fish and Game. I£ redesign is
required it shall come back to the Planning
Commission.
22. A focused survey for the San Diego Horned Lizard
and Orange Throated Whiptail prior to final map is
required. Surveys for this species shall focus on
ridge tops and canyon bottoms. Mitigation shall be
that required by the California Department of Fish
and Game.
23. Developer shall participate in any AB 939 City
adopted ordinances for solid waste reduction.
Areas shall be set aside within the tract for
recycling drop off areas prior to issuance of final
map.
Desian/Aesthetic Ympact Mitiaatio»
24. Subject to a Geotechnical Report, consideration
shall be given to cut slopes exceeding 2:1 slopes
that minimize the number of 30 foot benches
required. All slopes shall be contour graded
subject ~o fhe approval of the Community
Development Manager or his designee. All down
drains wherever possible shall be diagonal along
~he face of slopes or colored concrete shall be
used. A landscaping plan that minimizes stark cuts
such as clustered plant groupings of ground cover,
shrubs and trees shall be used. The planting
pallet shall be reviewed by a biologist or native
plant horticulturist in conjunction with the
Riverside county Fire Department ancl the City's
Landscape architect for the purpose of
incorporating Riversidean Sage Scrub species.
Improvements shall be installed prior to
Certificate of Occupancy.
25. The parkways of Elsinore Hills Drive, Elsinore
Ridge Road, East Cambern Loop and the loop street
within Tract 24659 shall be landscaped in
accordance with adopted City Public Right of Way
landscape guidelines, and include a combination of
ground cover, shrubs and trees. All street trees
shall be a minimum of 24" boxe Ymprovements shall
be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
26. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant
shall pay required fees ~o the City gor
implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring
Programo
27. A11 streets with reversing curves shall be
separated by a tangent, length of tangent to be
approved by the City Engineer.
28. The minimum horizontal radius for local streets
shall be 300 feet includinq East Cambern Loop.
PAGE SEVEN - CITY COONCIL MINUTES - JULY 13e 1993
29. Eliminate "H" Street off site in Tract 26459. Make
11B" and "C" Streets loop streets on Tract 36459.
30. Lots 186, 187, and 188 in Tract 26459 shall be
letter lots.
31. Lots 11171, 172, 173, 174, and 175 in Tract 25171
shall be lettered lots.
32. All major manufactured slopes exceeding 30-feet in
height shall be contour graded.
33. All major manufactured slopes exceeding 30-feet in
height shall provide room for bench drains.
34. The rear property line for all lots with rear yard
slopes shall be moved two feet (2') away form the
top of the slope.
35. A landscape maintenance easement shall be recorded
prior to Final Map for the maintenance of all large
sloped areas within individual lots. The
maintenance of these slopes shall be the
responsibility of the AOA. The developer shall
install all landscaping in common areas and in
common maintenance areas.
36. All major slopes outside the right-of-way for
Elsinore Hills Road shall be maintained by the HOA.
The City may, at its option, decide to maintain
these slopes after reviewing the tract landscape
plans.
37. Lots 17 and 18 on Tract 26459 shall be within the
~ract boundarye
38. All Public Works requirements shall be complied
with as a condition of development as specified in
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to final map
approval.
39. Dedicate underground water rights to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030).
Document can be obtained from the Engineering
Department.
40. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(MUnicipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34;
Resolution 85-26).
41. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City
Engineering Department, from the applicable water
district, stating that water and sewer arrangements
have been made for this project. Submit this
letter prior to final map approval.
42. Construct all off-site public works improvements
per approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title
12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City
Engineer prior to final map approval.
PAGE EIGHT - CITY COIINCIL MINOTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
43. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachmen~
permit issued by the Engineering Department for
construction of public works improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12.08 and
Resolution 83-78),
44. Street improvement plans and specifications shall
be prepared by a Civil Engineero Improvements
shall be desiqned and constructed to Riverside
County Road Department Standards, la~est edition,
and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04
and 16.34)0
45. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site
easements for off-site grading from the adjacent
property owners prior to final map approval.
46. Arrangements for relocation of utility company
gacilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) shall be the
responsibility of the property owner or his agente
47. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
48. Provide street lighting and show lightinq
improvements on street improvement plans as
required by the City Engineer.
49. Submit Hydrology and hydraulic study for review and
approval by City Enqineer prior to approval of
final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding
and or erosion downstream caused by development of
site and diversion of drainage, subject to Citg
Engineer approval.
50. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be
constructed to Riverside County Flood Control
District standards.
51. With the development of this site, all storm
facilities shall provide tract and immediate
downstream property owners with 100 year storm
flood protection.
52. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the
City for the construction of public works
improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds.
53. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic Reports
including street design recommendations. Provide
final Soils Report showing compliance with
preliminary and finish grade certification.
54. All lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public
facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by
a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
55. Developer shall provide No Parkinq and Street
Sweeping Signs for streets within tract or pay a
fee for installation by the City.
PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINIITES - JULY 13~ 1993
56. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement
markers in the street at all Fire hydrant
locations.
57. Map shall provide for all local streets to have
sixty foot (60') right-of-way with forty foot (40')
curb-to-curb. Restricted local streets (cul-de-
sacs) shall have fifty-foot with a three foot (3')
utility easement on each side.
58. Desirable grade for local streets is nine percent
(9~). The maximum grade of fifteen percent (15~)
should only be used because of design constraints.
59. All utilities except electrical over 12kv shall be
placed underground, as approved by serving utility.
60. Grading for this subdivision shall comply with the
grading objectives and guidelines established in
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
61. Applicant shall obtain off-site drainage acceptance
letters from affected adjacent property owners to
be recorded prior to or with final map.
62. Minimum horizontal curve radius for secondary
streets shall be 1,000 feet.
63. Applicant shall participate in an Assessment
District for the design and construction of the
Wasson Canyon Road circulation system prior to
final map approval. If an Assessment District is
not formed this applicant will be responsible for
providing two (2) paved access roads to this tract
as approved by the City Engineer.
64. Applicant shall cooperate with developers to the
north and east for the desiqn and construction of
Elsinore Hills Drive and Elsinore Ridge Road
connection to Camino Del Norte, Cambern and
Ramsgate.
65. The Geology Report submitted for the subdivision
shall include:
a) Identification of all faults to define
potential hazards.
b) Stability of man made slopes under either
static or dynamic conditions.
c) Differential settlement of engineered fills of
significant thickness, as determined by
geoloqist.
66. All existing utility easements through tract which
interfere with development shall be relinquished
prior to final map approval.
67. If right-of-way or easements are abandoned as part
of this development, then adjacent property
PAGE TEN - CITY COIINCIL MINUTES - JIILY 13~ Y993
affected by the abandonments must still have access
to public maintained right-of-ways.
68. All open space and slopes except for public parks
and schools and Flood Control District facilities,
outside the public right-of-way will be owned and
maintained by either a home owner's association os
private property owner.
69. Developer shall contribute a pro-rata share for the
design and construction for the proposed traffic
circulation improvements recommended and as shown
on Exhibit "S10 in Traffic Study prepared by Kahn,
Kain and Associates in October 1990 prior to Final
Map.
70e All improvement plans and tract maps shall be
digitized. At certificate of occupancy applicant
shall submit tapes and/or discs which are
compatible with City's ARC Info/Gis or developer to
pay $1,000 per sheet for City digitizing.
71. Yf public improvements are to be constructed in
phases, then a phasing plan must be approved by the
City Engineer prior to building permitso
72. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit will be required of construction activity,
underway or commencing after November 8, 1991, that
would disturb five or more acres. The permit is to
be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control
Board having jurisdiction. The owner shall provide
the City with proof of his having filed a Notice of
Intent with the Regional Board prior to issuance of
grading or building permits.
73. Eliminate the indication of grading to accommodate
stub road, but retain the easement right on east
Cambern Road,
74. The owner shall provide the City with storm water
pollution prevention plan per the Regional Water
Quality Control for Natural Pollutants Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) prior to issuance of
grading permit.
75. Developer shall be subject to all Master Planned
Drainage fees and will receive credit for all
Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed.
8,
(F:160.2)
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
0 WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO GRANT THE TWELVE MONTH EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24618, WHICH SHALL EXPIRE FEBRUARY
27, 1994, BASED ON THE FOLLOWYNG FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIOAIS OF APPROVAL:
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24618 - MORRISON HOMES
Substantial progress toward the development of this
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - JULY 13s 1993
Tract Map has taken placeo
2. The project as proposed and conditioned is
consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives
of the General Plan.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR EXTENSION OF TIME NO. 2
1. Extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24618
will expire one (1) year from date of approval
unless an additional extension of time is granted
by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and Title
16 of the Municipal Code.
2. The Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the State
of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply
to all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval.
A precise survey with closures for boundaries and
all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance.
Signage for this subdivision shall require City
Permits.
5. A noise study must be submitted prior to Minor
Design Review approval of the dwellings. Plottinq
and decorative block wall for Ortega Highway, to
ensure that the exterior and interior noise levels
specified by the City's Code are provided for lots
6-15 through building construction and a sound
attenuation wall. Standard hiqhway noise levels
should be assured for the Sound mitigation plan.
The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all
site preparation activity.
6. Street names within the subdivision shall be
approved by the Planninq Division.
7. A geoloqic report with associated recommendations
will be required for grading permits. All grading
shall conform to the requirements of Section 16.11
of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the
Uniform Building Code. A temporary erosion
control landscaping plan shall be approved prior to
issuance of grading permit. Temporary erosion
control landscaping shall be provided within 30
days of rough grading. The applicant shall bond
100% for materials and labor for one year.
8. Pay all Capital Improvement fees in effect at the
time of issuance of building permit.
9o Prior to final approval of Tract Map 24618 the
improvements specified herein and approved by the
Planning Commission and the City Council shall be
installed, or the bonds and agreement for said
improvements, shall be submitted to the City, and
all other stated conditions shall be complied withe
PAGE TWELVE - CITY COtTNCIL MINUTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
10. Prior to Final Tract Map approval by the City
Council, all lots within fhis subdivision shall
conform to the minimum dimensional standards of the
R-1 Zoning Districte
11. Prior to Final Map approval, applicant shall obtain
off-site slope easements for grading from adjacent
property owners, such easements shall be approved
by the City Engineer and City Attorney and
recorded.
12. Bond for drip or sprinkler irrigation system for
sloped areas, prior to the issuance of a building
permit. If a crib wall is proposed, the applicant
shall be responsible for the landscapinq/irrigation
for the height and length of the wall. A
planting/irrigation plan shall be submitted and
approved, prior to issuance of grading permit,
subject tot he approval of the City°s Landscape
Consultant and the Community Development Manager.
13. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of
payment of school mitigation fee is presented ~o
the City Building Division,
14. All of the improvements shall be designed by
developeros Civil Engineer to the specifications of
fhe City of Lake Elsinore.
15. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County
Fire Department.
16. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The
applicant shall provide connection to public sewer
for each lot within the subdivision. No service
laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and
shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and
profiles for submittal to the EVMWD.
17e The Developer shall submit plans to Southern
California Edison for a layout of the street
lighting system. The cost of street lighting,
installation as well as energy charqes shall be the
responsibility of the developer and/or the
association. Said plans shall be approved by the
City and shall be installed in accordance with the
City Standards.
18. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison
Company.
19. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas
Company.
20. Meet all requirements of General Telephone.
21, All trailers used during construction, mailboxes
and signage shall be subject to Planning Division
review and approval prior to installation.
22. The developer shall establish a Homeowners
PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COONCIL MINIITES - JULY 13~ 1993
Association to manage and impose fees to maintain
all slope or common areas, open space, private
drainage facilities, firebreaks, habitat areas,
private recreational facilities and grounds,
private streets and any other common amenities.
This association shall be established subject to
current State laws and be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney and Community Development
Manager or designee who shall review all CC & R's
and rules for their adequacy and completenesso The
City Attorney shall review CC & R's, homeowners
association documents and all documents to convey
title to the Homeowners Association.
23. Applicant shall submit and receive approval of
landscape and irrigation plans for model homes (if
such are desired), back-up wall areas, street trees
and slope planting in accordance with the City
Landscape Guidelines, prior to issuance of building
permits.
24. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project
prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes,
trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. CC
& R's shall also include screening any ground base
disk and no roof-mounted or front yard disk shall
be allowed. CC & R's shall be subject to the
approval of the Community Development Manager or
his designee, prior to recordation of any deeds or
final map. CC & R's shall be recorded prior to
issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the
units when developed in the future.
25. House plotting, architectural drawings, floor
plans, landscaping and fences/walls shall require
Minor Design Review approval prior to issuance of
building permits. All standards of development and
procedural steps in effect at the Minor Design
Review submittal shall apply for this project.
26. Provide a decorative masonry wall along Ortega
Highway at the pad elevation/property lines of
those lots at a height consistent with a noise
study acceptable to the Planning Division. Any
wall over 8 feet high shall require Planning
Commission approval. Other walls are subject to
the review and approval of the Community
Development Manager or designee prior to issuance
of a building permit. Provide a combination 4 foot
high decorative block wall with 2 feet wrought iron
above, along Grandview A v e n u e, a n d o n
northeasterly retaining wall at pad elevation, and
on Trabuco Avenue, as appropriate, to preserve
views (rather than using 6 feet of solid fencing).
All other side and rear property line fencing shall
be 6 feet high and meet the requirements of Section
17.14 and 12.23 of the Municipal Code.
27. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or buildinq
permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - SOLY 13~ 1993
executed original to the Community Development
Department,
28. Property line shall be at top of slopes with down
slope areas to be maintained as indicated in
Condition Number 22, with the exception of
Grandview Avenue and Trabuco Avenueo
29. All exposed lights shall be shielded above the
horizontal plane.
30. All Public Works requirements shall be complied
with as a condition of development as specified in
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code prior to the final
map approval.
31. Dedicate underground water riqhts to the City
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.53.030)a
Document can be obtained from Y.he Engineering
Departmento
32e All local streets shall have a 60 foot right-of-way
with 40 foot curb-to-curb. Restricted local
streets (cul-de-sacs) shall have 50 foot right-of-
way with 36 foot curb-to-curb and a 3 foot utility
easement on each side.
33. No single-family lots shall have ingress or egress
to collector street or higher volume traffic
streets,
34. Provide Soils, Geology and Seismic xeports
including street design recommendatione Provide
final Soils Report showing compliance with
preliminary and finish grade certificatione
35. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Checlc fees.
36. Submit a "Will-Serve" letter to the City
Engineering Department, from the applicable water
district, stating that water and sewer arrangements
have been made for this project. Submit this
letter prior to final map approval.
37e Construct all public eaorks improvements per
approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12).
Plans must be approved and signed by tfie City
Engineer prior to the issuance of building permi~.
(Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 16.34).
38. Street improvement plans and specifications shall
be prepared by a Civil Engineer, Improvements
shall be designecl and constructed to Riverside
County Road Department Standards, latest edition,
and City Codes (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04
and 16.34),
39. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroacfiment
permit issuance by the Engineering Department for
construction of off-site public worlcs improvements
(Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter 12e08 and
PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COIINCIL MIN[TTES - JDLY 13~ 1993
Resolution No. 83-78). All fees and requirements
for encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before
Certificate of Occupancy.
40. All compaction reports, grade certification,
monument certification (with tie-notes delineated
on 8-1/2" x 111° mylar) shall be submitted to
Engineering Department before final inspection of
off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
41. Applicant shall obtain necessary off-street
easements for off-site grading from the adjacent
property owners prior to final map approval.
42. Provide fire protection facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
43. Provide street lighting, show lighting improvement
on street improvement plans, as required by the
City Engineer.
44. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a
public facility or accepted by the adjacent
property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance
or conveyed to a drainage easement.
45. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall be submitted,
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and
Riverside County Flood Control District prior to
final map approval.
46. Al1 major drainage facilities in this tract shall
be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control
Standards and agreement entered into with the
District for construction, ownership and
maintenance.
47. All storm facilities shall provide tract and
downstream property owners with 100 year storm
flood protection and developer shall mitigate any
flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by
development off-site and diversion of drainage.
48. Applicant shall obtain any necessary Cal-Trans
permits and meet all Cal-Trans requirements for
right-of-way dedication and construction on Ortega
Highway.
49. Contribute $102.00 towards the City's Master
Entryway Sign Proqram.
50. Prior to the Final Map recordation, a subdivision
agreement shall be entered into with the
developer(s), owner (s) , and the city.
51. Applicant shall post required bonds for public
works improvements as established for the project
by the City Engineer prior to final map approval.
52. Developer shall contribute $6,000.00 towards the
PAGE SIXTEEN - C%T% COIINC%L MINIITE~ - JULY 13s 1993
design and construction of a~raffic signal at
Grand Avenue and Macy Street. The development will
increase traffic at the intersection at least 4~
and should contribute 4% towards construction.
53. Provide sufficient dedication along western tract
boundary for Grandview riqht-of-way of 66 feete
54. Grandview alonq tract boundary shall be improved to
provide a parking lane and two travel lanes (32
feet). Off-site from Aalf Moon Drive to Laguna
Avenue, Grandview shall be improveci to provide a
parking lane and two travel lanes (32 feet).
55. Applicant shall agree to enter into an assessment
district for the cost sharing for construction of
the Ortega Channel and major drainage laterals.
56. Approval of drainage plans for this subdivision is
conditioned upon completion of the master plan
drainage facility required as a condition of
approval for Tentative Tract Map 20139 to serve
this proposed subdivision. If tract 24618 is
constructed prior tot he completion of the Orteqa
Channel, then this developer shall construct the
permanent storm drain improvement under Grand
Avenue and enter into an agreement with developer
of Tract 20139 for appropriate reimbursement.
57. Developer shall extend the Ortega Channel lateral
in Grandview to the southerly tract boundary and
will be entitled to reimbursement through the
assessment district.
58. Annexation to the City's Landscaping and Lighting
District is required prior to approval of final
map,
59. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be
digitized, At Certificate of Occupancy, applicant
shall submit tapes and/or discs which are
compatible with the City's ARC Info/GIS or
developer to pay $1,000 per sheet for the City
digitizingo
60. If grading exceeds 50 cubic yards, grading plans
shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved
prior to final map approval. Prior to any grading,
the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and
post appropriate security.
61. The owner shall provide the City with proof of his
having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board for Natural Pollutant
Discharge System Permit prior to issuance of
grading permits.
62. This map is to be developed in one single phase.
63. Developer shall provide No Parking and Street
PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COONCIL MINOTES - JULY 13~ 1993
Sweeping Sinqs for streets within tract or pay a
fee for installation by the Citye
64. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement
markers in the street at all fire hydrant
locations.
65. The owner shall provide the City with storm water
pollution prevention plan per the Regional Water
Quality Control Board for Natural Pollutants
Discharge System (NPDES) Permit prior to issuance
of grading permit.
66. Applicant to process a Letter of Map Revision
(LOMR) for the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for
storm drain improvements which will be or have been
installed as part of this tract. The LOMR shall be
submitted to the Federal Emerqency Management
Agency (FEMA) prior to building permit issuancee
9.
(F:160.2)
City Manager Molendyk indicated that some fees are currently
due on this Map and the applicant has been contacted for
payment. He recommended continuance to July 27, 1993.
Mayor Washburn indicated he would concur with this
recommendation with the provision that there would be no
penalties if the time lapses in the meantimee
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY CHERVENY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF
4 TO 0 WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JULY 27,
1993.
10. Final Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Man No. 19344 (C/W
Asset Management, Inc.) Serenitv Tract - Corvdon Road.
(F:160.2)
Mayor Washburn indicated that he had pulled this item because
he had requests to speak.
Robert Reinin, 1425 W. Foothill Blvd., Upland, expressed
concern with outstanding conditions identified during the
transfer of title from Crowell Industries. He suggested a
condition for resolution of the concern.
Mayor Washburn noted the memo received from staff regarding
this issue of ownership.
City Manager Molendyk suggested continuance to allow the
questions to be addressed.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
0 WITH WINKLER ABSTAINING TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JULY 27~ 1993.
APPEAL
21.
(F;21.1)
PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COIINCIL MINOTES - JIILY 13s 1993
City Manager Molendyk explained this appeal and noted that the
residents feel, based on ~he existing development, the R-1
zoning designation is more appropriate for the areao
Mayor Washburn noted that he had requests to address this
item.
City Planner Leslie detailed fhe staff report.
Mayor Washburn requested clarification of the existing zoning.
Mr. Leslie indicated that it was currently zoned R-2, however
it is a predominantly single-family residence neiqhborhood.
Mayor Washburn noted that this is a combination of lots
extendinq from Chaney Street to Fran~lin Street; and the
project would be on septic rather than sewer systeme
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether a"perk" test had been
done on this site. Mr. Grage indicated that a perk test was
done and the property passed. Councilwoman Cherveny
questioned the General Plan designation of "Specific Plan",
and whether this plan would all be done at one time, and
whether other such developments would occur. Ci~y Attorney
Harper clarified the planning process and the potential
alternatives gor the Specific Plan.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether this proposal would be
considered inconsistent with the General Plan. Mr. Leslie
indicated that with the ~~Specific Plan10 designation the
ultimate use was still somewhat open. City Attorney Harper
clarified that a significant issue is whether the zoning and
general plan are compatible.
Leon Strigotte, 216 Chaney Street, defailed the original
knowledge of work on this property and advised that requests
were submitted to the Planning Department for notification of
the proposed projecto He further advised that notice was not
received except through the Planning Commission agenda. He
indicated that he has met with the property owner, and while
they are nice people, the project is not compatible with the
surrounding properties. He stressed that all other properties
in the neighborhood are single-family residences. He further
stressed that the final plan for Chaney Street is not known.
He also stressed the traffic and density concerns in the
overall area which have not been mitigated.
Denise Tompkins, 218 Chaney Street, concurred with the
comments of Mr. Strigotte and noted a petition circulated
which opposed the project. She presented additional comments
of opposition from an approximately six block area for the
record.
Nido Ryal, 223 Chaney Street, appellant, explained the
location and traffic concerns in the area of the project. He
stressed the unknowns of the ultimate Chaney Street alignment
and the concerns with high density development. He noted a
higher density development near the elementary school and
expressed concern with ~he related crime. He also noted the
affected residents present in the audience and requested
Council°s favorable consideration.
Ray Grage, 110 S. Main Street, representing Mr. & Mrs.
Terrebonne, expressed surprise with the level og opposition to
PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COIINCIL MINOTES - JIILY 13, 1993
this project, He noted revisions made to address the concerns
of the residents and meetings with the residents. He
indicated that there are four lots involved in this project
and compared the density to the existing single-family
residences. He detailed the work which had occurred over the
last year and information received from City staff in support
of this proposal. He stressed changes such as the removal of
second story windows, etc. to accommodate the existing
neighbors.
Mayor Washburn asked the residents how many would support this
project if it appeared to be more single-family oriented with
access on both Franklin Street and Chaney Street. He further
asked whether the owners would use this property as a rental.
The applicant indicated it would be a rental, and further
commented that they are not spending their funds to see the
property deterioratee
Councilwoman Cherveny expressed concern that this proposal is
not consistent with the surrounding developments. She
commented that rentals do not have the same pride of
ownership. She indicated she would see more "estate" type
homes in this area.
Councilman Alongi reminded Councilwoman Cherveny that her
modular home was not consistent with the area when she moved
it in. He stressed that the project meets the requirements of
its zoninq. He noted a similar concern on a project he built
and stressed the importance of not prejudicing the
understanding of rental property and its care.
Councilman Winkler commented that in reading this report he
had to consider whether he would want such a development next
door to him; and decided he would not. He indicated that he
would prefer a larqer master planninq effort in this area,
rather than a piecemeal approach. He indicated that the
policy makers can not be held responsible for the opinions
provided by staff.
Mayor Washburn suggested that this project was a catalyst to
bring the area into focus. He expressed concern that this
project would be inconsistent infill, and suggested that staff
address it as such. He noted that problems such as this are
not always a zoning issue as much as design issues. Ae
indicated that he would like to see consideration in the next
year or so for budgeting improvements such as curbs, gutters
and sidewalks on Chaney. He noted the difficulty of this
question.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez commented on the original zoning of
this area and suggested it might be appropriate.to update the
general plan for this area.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY CHERVENY TO OVERTURN THE PLANNING
r COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINOR DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT NO. 93-3 AND
DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND REQUESTED THAT STAFF LOOK INTO THE
PENDING SPECIFIC PLAN.
Mayor Washburn noted that there would seem to be other
alternatives to accomplish the applicant's goals as well as
PAGE TWENTY - CITY,COiJNCIL MINUTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
the homeowners~ wishes.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez suggested that this denial be without
prejudice to allow further revisions without new fees.
Mayor Washburn concurred he would want it without any new
fees.
Councilman Alongi indicated that the foregoing motion would
not be fair to the builder/owner. He suggested ~hat if it is
zoned properly the owner has the right to build. He
sympathized with the residents, but indicated that the project
as proposed was legally acceptable. He indicated that this
action would downgrade the value of the property. iie
questioned the impact on the owner's project of waiting for
~he specific plan. Mayor Washburn indicated he could be
working on ~he plan in the meantime.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez inquired whether there would be a time
limit. Mayor Washburn indicated that staff could e~cpedite it.
Councilman 6~7inkler indicated that he would like staff to
return with a report on the status of the specific plan and
the possible timing.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY P, VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH ALONGI
CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
FINDINGS
1. The project as proposed does not comply with the
goals and objectives of the General Plan.
2. The project as proposed cloes not adequately comply
with the design directives contained in Section
17.82.060, Scope of Design Review, of the City
Zoninq Code, in that it is not consistent with
existing surrounding development,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
22. 1993-94 Fiscal Year Budaet - Resolution No. 93-36. (F:30.1)
City Manager Molendyk detailed the report and explained the
impact of State subventions from the City and Redevelopment
Agency funds. He indicated that the budget as presented is
balanced. He detailed the general revenue and its sources,
the Cost Recovery System, non-recurring revenues, sales tax
increases, etc. He noted that in 1990 the City had 71
employees and now in 1993 the City has 55 employees despite
the continuing increase in population. He also noted the
increase in sheriff's officers employed by the City during the
same period. He recommended adoption of the General Fund
Budget as presented and commented on the one-time revenues and
the long list of possible uses.
Mayor Washburn noted the graph regarding City Employees and
Sheriff's Department and indicated the graphs were helpful in
explaining the status.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the $267,000 in one time
funds used to balance the budget. Mr. Molendyk indicated that
was separate from the $500,000 in one time dollars.
PAGE TWENTY-ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINIITES - JOLY 13, 1993e
Councilman Winkler noted that the budget is a roll-over with
less money. He recommended adoption of the Resolution.
Mayor Washburn opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m.
Kelly Rockwell, 521 Lake Street spoke in support of the "Kids
on Track" program. She stressed the importance of providing
a constructive environment to help keep the kids from gang and
other negative activities. She indicated that parents can not
always be there for their children and this program helps
supplement.
Andre Smith, 15293 Windjammer, supported the ~~Kids on Track1°
program and the potential for kids to become involved in
gangs. He stressed the need to take preventative action by
takinq the kids off the streets.
Mayor Washburn closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ TO APPROVE RECOMMENDATION
#1 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-36; AND REGARDING THE $500,000 OF
ONE-TIME REVENUES, CONTINUE THE CONSIDERATION OF THESE FUNDS FOR
ONE MONTH WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE $76,000 FOR THE KIDS ON TRACK
PROGRAM.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA~ APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
1993-94 AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE
EXPENDITURES SET FORTH HEREIN.
Councilman Alonqi concurred with Councilman Winkler regarding
the importance of the kids on tract program, however, he
requested discussion of the rest of the $500,000 too. He
indicated if it was not discussed he was willing to go through
the proposed budget paqe by page to find possible cuts. He
expressed concern that the proposed list for the $500,000
included nothing for housing and he would like some included.
xe indicated ~A9~p~~ like to see at least for
housing and he would not support the Century Perimeter
Fencing.
City Manaqer Molendyk noted that in addition to the items
listed, the $2.6 million in the Redevelopment Agency budget
would also be carried over for discussion. He suggested it
might be helpful to add to the list with item such as
Heald/Ellis Housing -$200,000 and Heald/Spring Property
$700,000 as requested by Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez. He noted
that the final funding of projects would be subject to Council
concurrence.
Mayor Washburn indicated that he would like to adopt the
budget with the $500,000 used for the Contract Senior Planner,
City Facilities, Additional training/Planning Commission,
Upgrade/New Computers, Charity Groups, Police - Additional
Overtime, and Consultant - Housing Programs; listed as items
1 through 7 on Exhibit A, with the Methodist Church (item #8)
being moved into the Redevelopment Agency Budget.
PAGE TWENTY-TWO - CITY COIINCIL MIN[JTES - JIIL% 13~ 1993
He then suggested moving Kids on Track into the funded
projects with the remaining $108,000 being field in reserve fox
consideration with the $2,6 million reserved in the
Redevelopment Agency budgete He fur~her concurred that
Heald/Ellis, Heald/Spring and Nashland should be added to the
list.
Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that the $108,000 be added to
the police overtime to help implement the crime support group
and hire security guards with cars to patrol gor 8 hours per
day from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. to provide extra eyes and ears in
the community. She stressed that this will help to reduce the
crime and she would really like the budget amended to include
something gor public safety. She indicated that this type of
additional patrol had been very successful in Sun City.
Mayor Washburn concurred that it could be used for augmenting
police through private security and suggested that private
security might be a better approach with one-time money.
Councilwoman Cherveny addressed the use of Community Service
Officers which would require four for two on the street. She
stressed the need for more coverage with eyes and ears on the
street.
Councilman Winkler expressed concern with this use since it is
one time money and personnel would need to be hired and
possibly let go in a few months. He stressed the benefit of
tearing down buildings, which has been seen by the Sheriff's
Department. He indicated that he would particularly address
X and other areas. He suggested that this decision be
postponed until after the Stadium is discussedo Ae indicated
that these one-time dollars should be addressed as a package
with the exception of the Kids on Track Program which
involves continuation o£ existing personnel.
Councilwoman Cherveny agreed that abatement has an impact, but
indicated that security would address more of the Communityo
She noted the Outlet Center and Walmart revenues that will
support this program in the future. She indicated that she
felt that $500,000 was a minimal request.
Councilman Alongi commented that he understood Councilman
Winkler's position on one time money, but stressed that it
should go where it does the most good and produces for the
City. He indicated that he understood the concerns with
Nashland, but stressed that it is someone else's problem.
Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that Nashland should be
addressed in the Redevelopment Agency budget, and indicated
she would have no problem looking at those areas with the $2.6
millione
Councilman Winkler suggested that it would be better to
address this in one month when more information is available.
Mayor Washburn indicated he would argue against the motion
with regard to the $500,000 in that the charity groups have
waited long enough and other things are needed.
PAGE TWENTY-THREE - CITY COIINCIL MINOTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH CHERVENY
CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE.
BUSINESS ITEMS
31. Consolidation of Future Citv Council Elections. (F:72.1)
City Manager Molendyk explained this item as proposed by the
City Treasurer. He noted that in light of the State budget
cuts this is one area to save money.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI TO REJECT CONSOLIDATION OF
FUTURE ELECTIONS.
Councilwoman Cherveny noted the previous discussions of this
recommendation, primarily the importance of maintaining focus
on City issues. She indicated that while she appreciated the
proposed cost savings, she felt it was necessary to retain the
focus.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez commented on previous April Elections
and the momentum of other elections.
Mayor Washburn commented on previous attempts to increase
voter turnout such as extended pollinq hours. He indicated
that it would appear those interested will vote, but changes
in the process don't seem to have an impact. He stressed the
importance of looking at the future and rememberinq that
cities will have less and less money. He indicated that he
didn't feel it would impact the overall politics.
Councilwoman Cherveny stressed the previous comments and the
importance of finding what best serves the Community.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he felt the elections should
remain in April and suggested that $13,000 is not that much
money. He stressed the increasing uniqueness of the Community
and the potential for more issues to be decided by the voters.
He indicated that he feels the people will vote no matter
what. He suggested that the Council wait a few years to
determine the direction the voters are going.
THE FOREGOING MOTION FAILED TO CARRY BY A VOTE OF 2 TO 2 WITH
DOMINGUEZ AND WASHBURN CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTES AND WINKLER
ABSTAINING.
Councilman Winkler indicated that he needed more comparative
information on voter turnouts.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OE 3
TO 2 WITH ALONGI AND' DOMINGUEZ CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTES TO
BRING THIS ISSUE BACK IN 30 DAYS.
32. Sheriff Contract - Facilitv Charges. (F:127.2)
City Manager Molendyk explained that this item was continued
to confirm property ownership and detailed the request. He
noted that this item was included in the proposed budget.
MOVED BY CHERVENY~ SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
PAGE TWENTY-FOUR - CIT% COLTNCIL MYNIITES - JIILY 13e 1993
VOTE TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AND AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF THE
$33,939.20.
33. Fire Protection Agreement - Fiscal Year 1993-94,
(F:68.1)(X:127.3)
City Manager Molendyk advised that this item was continued at
the last meeting to allow for finalization of the budget. He
noted that this item was included in the probosed budaet_
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE JULY 9, 1991 AGREEMENT AND
AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT.
34.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned condition #36 and wfiether
Walmart would include the tile treatment as well. Mr. Leslie
indicated it would be addressed later.
Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether condition #18 looked to
the developer for the landscaping or to Walmart. Mr. Leslie
indicated that it would look more to the developer, but since
it also impacts Walmart they would also be involved.
Councilwoman Cherveny expressed concern with the maintenance
of the landscape after the center is complete and questioned
the City's ability to abate problems and charge back for the
services. She indicated she would like this matter
conditioned further. City Attorney Harper suggested drafting
a reciprocal easement agreement ~o address this issue. He
noted that the problem of collecting the reimbursement sti11
exists. Councilwoman Cherveny inquired whether these charges
could be added to the tax rolls. Mr. Harper indicated that it
could be added as a condition, but it might put the City in
the position of maintaining private propertyo
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez inquired whether transportation had
been addressed, like bus bench placement. Mr. Leslie
indicated tha~ it was probably addressed in the Specific Plan
and he would need to check. City Attorney Harper indicated
that this could also be a condition.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez questioned the provision of Automatic
Teller Machines and suggested that if they will have one, it
be placed inside the store. Mr. Leslie indicated that this
would be addressed as a vending machine. City Attorney Harper
commented that many ATM companies are reluctant to place them
outside.
Councilman Alongi addressed the landscaping and requested
something to require maintenance. Mr. Harper indicated that
it may already be addressed through CC & R's. Mr. Alongi
further indicated that he would not want the parking areas
restricted for individual stores. He also indicated that the
Air Conditioning units could be screened very easily. He
expressed concern with the facade and stressed the good
City Planner Leslie detailed this project and the associated
site plans, conditions and landscaping.
PAGE TWENTY-FIVE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - JIILY 13~ 1993
appearance of the Outlet Center. He sugqested that this
center should be the same way.
Mayor Washburn noted Planning Commission discussion of similar
issues.
Councilwoman Cherveny noted the middle shops which show a
fancier overhang. She indicated that this should continue to
Walmart as it presents a better image. City Manager Molendyk
noted that the continuation of the overhang would help to
shelter the handicap parking areas from rain and heat.
Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that areas awaiting
construction be landscaped. She expressed concern with the
roof top equipment and noted that a solution was found for the
Outlet Center. She indicated that Condition #38 addressed
another of her concerns and requested tough enforcement of
that condition. She further requested the addition of
Condition #42 for an agreement regarding landscape
maintenance.
City Manager Molendyk noted concerns with the machines, rides
etc, in front of stores and stressed that they are not
approved as part of the plan being considered.
Mayor Washburn suggested that Condition #38 also address racks
for shopping carts and questioned the phasing of this project.
Mr. Leslie indicated that it would be built in two phases.
Mayor Washburn questioned the impact of the phasing on the
landscaping requirement. Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that
at least perimeter landscaping be in place. The applicant
concurred with this approach.
Mayor Washburn expressed concern with the need for
enhancements on the side of the building. He indicated that
the mansard and screening of the Air Conditioning units would
help.
Councilwoman Cherveny suggested that line 2 of condition #38
be deleted. Mayor Washburn stressed the need for Community
Development Director involvement in the process. He suggested
the addition of "storaqe of carts" be included in the
condition.
Councilman Alongi indicated that it would be better to say
"cart storage inside only".
Mayor Washburn requested the addition of Condition #42
"Establish Reciprocal landscape maintenance easement, with
City ability to enforce".
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez requested Condition #43 to require
coordination of bus benches and related matters with Riverside
Transit Agency.
Councilwoman Cherveny requested Condition #44 requiring
perimeter landscaping.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the proposed name of the
center and inquired whether it could be Lake Elsinore City
PAGE TWENTY-~I$ - CITY COONCIL MINOTEB - JOLY 13a 1993
Center rather than Elsinore City Center. The applicant
concurred ~his would be appropriate.
Glen Dagel, Project Architect, 12620 High Bluff Drive, San
Diegoo indicated that this project is on a fact track and the
goal is to start construction on September 27th, with opening
in Spring of 1994. He stressed the need for this approval to
allow for submittal of plans. He indicated that all design
issues have been addressed and any minor modification will
follow the specific plan.
John Baker, architect commented that he has been involved in
developing the plans since 1990 to address a variety of
possible major tenants, He noted particular design aspects
and the intent to work with smaller major tenants to provide
better visibility within the center. He stressed the Walmart
prototype and the limited ability to modify i~. He further
stressed that this plan has been modified more than any other
facility. He addressed the air conditioning unit screening
and indicated that the view would be minimal from Tuscany
Hills or the I-15 freeway due to the distances involved. He
indicated that the only solution would be to raise the height
of the roof to screening the units and expressed concern with
the additional costs. City Manager Molendyk questioned the
increase in costs. Mr. Baker indicated it would be
approximately $1.50 to $2.00 per square foot.
City Manager Molendyk commented on Council discussion and the
fact that only one wall will be fully visible, and stressed
the Council conditions and requests. Mr. Baker indicated that
he will need to go back to Walmart representatives for
approval. He further indicated that he has no information
regarding the vending machine issue, however he indicated that
he could see enforcement problems after the fact.
City Manager Molendyk indicated that the Council is saying
they don°t want the machines at all. Mr. Baker indicated that
would need to be addressed by the owner.
Mr. Baker noted the discussion of rooftop equipment and
indicated they were not sure whether they would house it or
not and stressed the distance and limited visibility. He
indicated that he was not certain of a solution other than a
second roof.
Mayor Washburn stressed the efforts required of the architect
and the need to address specified points, He noted that the
City has successfully imposed changes in corporate prototypes
in the past and would intend to do so on ~his project. He
stressed the Council's concern for a quality project.
City Manager Molendyk commented that with the Outlet Center it
was indicated that the concerns with the air conditioning
units should have been mentioned earlier as they could have
been solved through design and sinking them into the roof
structure. He stressed staff's efforts to resolve this
concern up front. Mr. Daqel indicated that the roof is already
as low as it can gete
Councilwoman Cherveny stressed the importance of getting the
best product for the Community and for the investment by the
PAGE TWENTY-SEVEN - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - JDLY 13~ 1993
City. She indicated that she would want "the best" Walmart.
Mayor Washburn indicated that there were three options, 1)
continue the project, 2) approve and work with them on the
plan or 3) request and amendment of the specific plan, noting
that the specific plan addresses architecture.
Councilman Alongi
stressed the need
Dagel indicated he
noted the assistance being
to screen the air conditioning
would agree
to the condition.
provide and
units. Mr.
Mayor Washburn indicated that Council can decide and allow
Walmart time to consider. Mr. Dagel questioned the
alternative allowing the quickest action.
Mayor Washburn indicated approval with appropriate conditions.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 92-2 BASED ON THE EXHIBIT
"a" PACKAGE, THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH CONDITION #38 AMENDED TO INCLUDE
"STORAGE OF SHOPPING CARTS" AND THE INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS 42, 43 AND 44 AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL.
FINDINGS - COMMERCIAL PROJECT 93-2
Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval and
the Mitigation Measures contained in the certified
Environmental Impact Report No. 92-3 for the site,
the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The project, as proposed complies with the Goals,
Objectives and Policies of the General Plan, the
Elsinore City Center Specific Plan, and the Zoning
District in which it is located.
3. This project complies with the desiqn directives
contained in the Elsinore City Center Specific
Plan.
Conditions and safequards pursuant to Chapter
17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated
into the approval of the subject project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82 and the Elsinore City
Center Specific Plan.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
1. Design Review approval for Commercial Project No.
93-2 will lapse and be void unless building permits
are issued within one (1) year of Planning
Commission approval. An extension of time, up to
one (1) year per extension, may be granted by the
Community Development Manager prior to the
expiration of the initial Design Review approval
upon application by the developer one (1) month
prior to expiration.
2. These Conditions of approval shall be reproduced
PAGE TWENTY-EIGHT - CITY COtJNCIL MINUTES - JULY 13~ 1993
upon Page One of Building Plans prior to their
acceptance by the Division of Building and Safety.
3. All site improvements shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved site plan and elevationso
Revisions to approved site plans or building
elevations shall be subject to the discretion of
the Community Development Manager. All plans
submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall
conform with the submitted plans or as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission
through subsequent action.
4e Materials and colors depicted on the materials
board shall be used unless modified by the
Community Development Manager or his designee.
5o Applicant shall meet all conditions of approval
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
ancl release of utilities,
6. Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and
Ordinances including State handicap requirements.
7. Meet all Riverside County Health Department
requirements.
8. Meet all Riverside County Fire Department
requirements.
9. Project must meet all requirements of Cal-Transo
10. No outdoor storage (except enclosecl outdoor tire
storage area as presented on approved Wal-Mart
Plans) shall be allowed for any tenant.
11. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City
standards as approved by the Community development
Manager or designee, prior to issuarzce of
Certificate of Occupancy,
12. All roof ladders and electrical panels shall be
located within the interior of the building or in
specially designed areas concealed from public
right-of-way view.
13. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class
"A" fire rating.
14. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning
units or other mechanical equipment incidental to
development shall be architecturally screened so
that they are not visible from neighboring
property, public streets, and the I-15. Screeninq
plan shall be approved by the Community Development
Atanager or designee, prior to issuance of building
permit.
15. All exterior down-spouts shall be constructed
witlain the interior of the building or concealed
from public right-of-way view.
PAGE TWENTY-NINE - CITY COIINCIL MIN[JTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
16. Bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to major
commercial uses. Placement, design and quantity
shall be indicated on the final landscapinq plan,
and subject to the approval of the Community
Development Manager or designee, prior to the
issuance of building permit.
17. The parking lot landscaping designs shall provide
at least one (1) twenty-four-inch (24") tree for
every ten (10) spaces with planter box to be
staggered every row, and subject to the approval of
the City's Landscape Architect and Community
development Manager or designee.
18. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be
reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape
Architect Consultant and the Community Development
Manager or designee, prior to issuance of buildinq
permit. A Landscape Plan Check fee will be charged
prior to final landscape approval based on the
consultant~s fee plus forty percent (40~).
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and
automatic sprinkler system with 100~ plant and
grass coverage using a combination of drip and
conventional irrigation methods.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected
from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of
forty feet (40') (Per the Elsinore City Center
Specific Plan) apart and at least twenty-four-
inch (24") box. On areas where screening, is
necessary trees shall be at least thirty -six-
inch (36") box size.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from
paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six
inch (6") wide concrete curb.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15") of
ingress/eqress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an
appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide
for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15)
years.
f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical
equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan
and screened as part of the landscapinq plan.
g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground
cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all
requirements of the City~s adopted Landscape
Guidelines. Special attention to the use of
Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with
combination drip irrigation system to be used
to prevent excessive watering.
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded
PAGE TH%RTY ~ CIT% COIINCIL MIN[JTES - JOLY 13~ 5993
120~ Faithful Performance Bond, and released
at completion of installation of landscape
requirements approval/acceptance, and bond
100~ for material and labor for one (1) year.
i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be
installed within affected portion of any phase
at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
requested for any building. All planting
areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape
concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with
approved site plan.
k) Final landscape plans to include planting and
irrigation detailse
19. All undeveloped lots alonq Grape Street shall be
maintained in a neat and safe condition, with
erosion and weed control methods applied by the
developer as necessary to meet ~he approval of the
Community Development Manager until such time as
~hese lots are built-out. If building permits are
not issued within 90 days all areas or pads graded,
during the gradinq operation, shall be landscaped
and irrigatedo
20. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in
height shall have a permanent irrigation system and
erosion control vegetation installed, approved by
the Planning Division.
21e All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and
directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neiqhboring property and streets or allow
illumination above the horizontal plane of the
fixture.
22. Applicant shall annex project into the City's
Landscape and Lighting District.
23. The applicant shall develop a Uniform Sign Program
for the center which specifies harmonious and
consistent colors, materials and specifications
which will enhance the center's design and meet the
provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Chapter
17.94 and the approved Elsinore City Center
Specific Plan. The Master Signaqe Program shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
All signage including freestanding signs shall be
by City Permit and in conformance with the approved
Master 5ignage Program. The Master Signage Proqram
shall be approved prior to issuance of Certificate
or Occupancy or release of utilities. Individual
sign permits are required prior tot he erection of
each signe
24. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all
requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District (EVMWD). Applicant shall submit water nd
PAGE THIRTY-ONE - CITY COIINCIL MINIITES - JIILY 13~ 1993
sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all
district conditions and standards.
25. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with
yellow striping and shall meet City and Specific
Plan Standards for loading zones. This project
shall be designed so ~hat every unit (with the
exception of shop #3 which is to have two (2)
loading areas) is provided with a loading space as
required by the City Municipal Code and the
Elsinore City Center Specific Plan.
26. Trailers utilized during construction shall be
approved by the Planning Division.
27. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
28. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-
inch (4") lines two-feet (2") apart.
29. Painted arrows on the asphalt shall be located at
all internal one-way drive aisles.
30. Prior to issuance of any qrading permit or building
permits, the applicant shall sign and complete and
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the
executed original to the Community development
Department for inclusion in the case records.
31. This project shall be subject to the Mitigation
Monitoring Program contained in the Certified
Environmental Impact Report No.92-3.
32. Any tenant within this development that can
potentially employ 100 people or more shall be
subject to the requirements of Ordinance No. 941
(Trip Reduction Ordinance) adopted October 27,
1992.
33. The rear, and side elevation design of the Wal-Mart
building shall provide architectural elements of
relief used throughout the center. The proposed
revised elevation shall be reviewed and approved by
the Community Development Manager or designee.
34. The applicant shall submit revised plans
illustrating the crib wall broken-up at about
midpoint with a bench or a step wide enough to
allow a row of small trees and/or shrubs along the
entire lenqth. This bench or step with a row of
small trees and/or shrubs will break up the mass
and shall provide relief from the monotonous,
uninterrupted e~cpanse of wall. This plan shall
meet the approval of the Community Development
Manager or designee and the City~s Landscape
Architect.
35. The landscaped area where the Wal-Mart auto service
center building is proposed shall be heavily
landscaped in compliance with Condition of Approval
No. 18 (b) to screen the loading/entry roll up door
PAGE THIRTY-TWO - CITY COiJNCIL MINUTES - JULY 13~ 1993
and reduce noise levels generated by the sue of
air/electrical tools.
36e The Wal-Mart ancl adjacent buildings (Shope #1,2,
and major tenant) shall continue the design concept
where appropriate of the mansard roofing with
spanish mission tile treatment exhibited in Shop
~3. The revised elevations shall be subject to the
approval of the Community Development Manager prior
to City Council consideratione
37. The Final Site Landscaping Plan sfiall include more
landscaping/landscape planters in front of all
proposed buildings. This plan shall meet the
approval of the Community development Manager or
designee and the City's Landscape Architect,
38o All vending machinese tables, kid's rides,
newspaper racks, storage of shopping carts,
telephones and similar devices shall be concealed
from view with a structure consistent with the
building design. These shall be approved by the
Community Development Manager or his designee prior
to installation,
39. The applicant shall submit a graffiti removal
program. This program shall include methods for
immediate graffiti removal and shall be subject to
~he approval of the Community development Manager
or clesignee,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
40. Meet all Conditions of Approval for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27659e
41. Medians in driveways shall be moved back out of the
right-of-way to provide proper truck turning into
the site.
42. Developer shall siqn a Reciprocal Landscape
Maintenance easement, with City ability to enforce.
43. Coordinate appropriate bus benches and related
facilities with Riverside Transit Agency.
44, Provide perimeter landscaping for the entire project
until development is completede
35e
. (F:112.1)
City Manager Molendyk indicated that this item was in relation
to the misuse of a City Street for the storage of U-Haul
equipmente
MOVED ~Y DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
93-27.
Councilwoman Cherveny questioned the necessity of prohibiting
all parking. She indicated tfiat she did not feel it solved
PAGE THIRTY-THREE - CITY COIINCIL MIN[JTES - JIILY 13~ 1993
the problem, and if it is done there are other areas to be
addressed as well.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he does not feel the City
should start posting "No Parking" signs on public streets. He
suggested addressinq the 72 hour limitations, and noted that
people do park there to use the businesses in the area.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez indicated that the traffic code
requires signage to allow for enforcement.
Councilman Alongi indicated that it can be enforced, and noted
a similar situation at the Texaco station on Main Street. He
indicated that it could be enforced through existing
ordinances against advertising in the public right-of-way.
City Attorney Harper indicated that he was not certain this
was addressed by the ordinances, however, there is some
opportunity to address those with "for rent" signs in the
windows. Councilman Alongi questioned the difference between
limiting these vehicles and limiting truckers. Mr. Harper
indicated that the trucks can be restricted by size, but II-
hauls are generally like any other vehicle.
City Manager Molendyk indicated that staff could review the
alternatives further. He noted concerns with ability of large
trucks to turn into existing businesses in this area.
Councilman Alongi advised that he is certain that this is
addressed by Title 17.
Mayor Pro Tem Dominguez concurred that it was necessary to
review the signs and the street where the concern has come up.
Mayor Washburn noted that there may be concerns with blocked
visibility.
THE FOREGOING MOTION AS WITHDRAWN WITH CONCURRENCE OF THE SECOND.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM.
36.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 AS PRESENTED.,
37.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
TO ACCEPT THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AS PRESENTED.
38. Notice of Completion - Robb Road Thrie Beam Barrier at Coal
Avenue. (F:156.2)
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
PAGE THIRTY-FOOR - CITY COONCIL MINQTES - JIILY 130 1993
TO ACCEPT THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AS PRESENTED.
39e Business License Reauest - "Sbaceball". (F:34.1)
City Manager Molendyk indicated that this item is before the
Council because there is not really a business license
classification which fits this use. He recommended approval,
but suggested that Council consider looking at a way to handle
this type of request administratively.
MOVED BY CAERVENY, SECONDED BY WINKLER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO GRANT THE BUSINESS LICENSE REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS:
1. Only on private property at the written request of the
property owner, showing the dates and times.
2. only on public property at special events put on by a
non-profit group (i.e.e City, Chamber of Commerce).
3o Provide proof of liability insurance prior to the
issuance of the license.
40. Resolution No. 93-28 - Alternative Method of County Tax
Distribution. (F:140.1)
Administrative Services Director Boone explained this i~em
which enacts a law which has been on the books since 194Y. He
further explained that this action will allow the County to
finance the delinquencies and distribute the funds to the City
immediately,
City Attorney Harper inquired whether this would include
Mello-12oos District charges. Mr. Boone indicated that it will
include property taxes, Lighting & Landscaping Maintenance
District fees, Weed Abatement charges and potentially
Assessment Districts and Community Facilities Districtse Iie
indicated that the program will be in place in approximately
60 days.
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-28:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS APPROVAL TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD
OF TAX DISTRIBUTION -"TEETER PLAN1° - S~ 742.
41. Parkina Enforcement Procedure Revision - Ordinance No 961.
(F:112.1)
City Attorney Harper advised that based on a meeting this
date, he would recommend continuance to allow the addition of
violations relating to the lake to this process,
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
~IOTE TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE NO. 961 FOR TWO WEEKS,
42e Second Readina - ordinan~P un_ ~tin -
- McArthur Glen. (F:150.2
PAGE THIRTY-FIVE - CITY COONCIL MINOTES - JOLY 13~ 1993
MOVED BY CHERVENY, SECONDED BY WINKLER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 960:
ORDINANCE NO. 960
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN 90-1 AMENDMENT #1 AND
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 93-3 FOR THE LAKE ELSINORE
OUTLET CENTER (McARTHUR GLEN).
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI~ CHERVENY, DOMINGUEZ~ WINKLER~
WASHBURN
NOES:
NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
POHLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Ace Vallejos, 15231 Cobre, noted item 13 of this agenda regarding
the Laquna Heights project. He expressed concern that this
proposed project is incompatible with the surrounding zoning and
development. He encouraged other residents concerned with the
project to contact the Local Agency Formation Commission. He also
expressed concern with the level of City services versus County
services. Ae commented on the possibility of being included in an
assessment district or paying additional taxes relating to the
Municipal Stadium. City Attorney xarper clarified that it would
not be possible to impact the residents with an assessment district
or any other taxes for the Stadium.
Joy Porthunder, 115 S. Spring Street, inquire3 whether
Councilmembers Alongi and Cherveny intended to resign as discussed
during the recent Recall Election. Both Councilmembers indioated
they would not resign and suggested that not everything included in
the newspaper should be believed.
Peter Dawson, 18010 Grand Ave., representing Southshore Homeowners,
noted that this was the first Council Meeting since the City
received the Lake. He congratulated the City on this transfer and
expressed hope for a new level of cooperation between the City and
the County property owners. Mayor Washburn concurred and announced
a meeting on July 15, 1993, regarding the master planning for the
Lake.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Molendyk reminded the Council of the July 15th Study
Session and detailed the items to be discussed.
City Manager Molendyk indicated that there was need for an
Executive Session concerning Personnel/Labor Negotiations.
MAYOR WASHBURN RECOMMENDED WITH COUNCIL CONCURRENCE THAT COUNCIL
COMMENTS BE DEFERRED TO THE END OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 10:05 P.M.
PAGE THIRTY-SIB - CITY COtJNCIL MINUTES - JIILY 13, 1993
CITY COIINCII, COMMENTS
Deferred to Redevelopment Agency Meeting.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 10:46 P.M.
CLOSED SESSIOBi
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A JOINT CLOSED SESSION
WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 10:46 P.M. TO DISCUSS, O.M.G. VSe
THE CITY~ LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AND POTENTIAL LITIGATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 11:05 P.M. NO ACTION
TAKEN.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY WASABURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 11:06 P.M. TO
JULY 19, 1993, AT 2:00 P.M. IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE
ROOM OF CITY HALL, 130 S. MAIN ST EET, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA.
Y v( ~~
GARY . WASHBURNe~
CIT OF LAKE ELSINORE
A TESTe
~~::~~~~
VICKI KAS~J, CITY CLERK
CITY OE Y~AECE ELSINORE