HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-20-1994 City Council Study Session
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 SOUTH HAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
-- *****************************************************************
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Washburn called the Lake Edge Specific Plan Study Session to
order at 9:35 a.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, BENDER, PAPE, WASHBURN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VACANT
Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager
Rogers, Administrative Services Director Boone, city Planner
Leslie, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, Public Services
Director Tecca, Planning Commission Chair Brinley, Planning
Commissioner Metze, Planning Commissioner Bullard, Planning
Commissioner Neff and City Clerk Kasad.
DISCUSSION ITEM
1.
Allev Reauests. (F:16.1)
-
City Manager Molendyk explained that there have been several
requests for the closure of alleys in the city. He stated
that he felt that Council should receive the available
information to better form an opinion for any future action.
-
Public Services Director Tecca explained that the city has
received several requests, the majority from Matt Anderson,
and explained the expressed reason for the closure are that
the following problems would be eliminated, or at least
improved: 1) the actual and anticipated level of accidents
that have/will occur within the alley; 2) the level speed that
drivers are choosing when they use the alley; and 3) illegal
activities which are occurring because of the convenient
location of the facility. Public Services Director Tecca
noted that a specific study was done and the alley in question
covers Langstaff Street to the east and Lindsay Street to the
west and it was discovered that of all the alleys in the city
there has only been one accident in the last three years and
by chance that one accident happened at the alley way in
question. He explained that it could have occurred at any
location. Public Services Director Tecca further explained
that if the alley were closed it would not be possible for a
car to turn around in the space available and Law Enforcement
would not be able to patrol the alley way; further the trash
pickup would have to be moved to the front of the residences
to be picked up. He explained that the alleys are not used as
public thoroughfares and the one in question which is dirt, is
only used by the residents. He noted that there are eleven
garages open to the alley and the ingress and egress to the
garages would have to be changed. Public Services Director
Tecca explained that it is concluded that there are no valid
traffic engineering reasons to close the alley; and to
maintain reasonable pOlice enforcement activities, this alley
should not be closed. He stated that it is his recommendation
that the alley should not be closed unless 100% of the
residents who use the alley wish to have it closed.
PAGE TWO - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
Mayor Washburn asked Lt. Garthwaite his opinion of alleys.
Lt. Garthwaite noted that through alleys offer an advantage to
Law Enforcement, because they give Law Enforcement the
opportunity to access the rear of properties. He explained
the if alleys are closed off and made a dead end situation,
then it creates a problem similar to Nashland. Officers will
not patrol that type of area unless they are sent in because
it is an adverse safety situation. He explained that an open
alley will be patrolled, and he stated that he did not feel
that this alley was different from any other alley in the _
City, because most of the crimes that occur in alleys are
opportunistic crimes. Lt. Garthwaite explained that by
closing off the alley, there could be an increase in crime in
the area because of the lack of patrol of the area.
Councilman Alongi asked if there were any lights in the alley.
Public Services Director Tecca stated that there are none.
Councilman Alongi asked if alleys could be lit through the
Lighting and Landscaping District. Public Services Director
Tecca explained that the reason that lighting is not installed
in alleys is because it lights the back yards of residences
and illuminates the back of their houses, and the residents
complain. Councilman Alongi stated that the angle of lighting
can solve that issue. He explained that his problem with
closing the alley off is the fact that homes have already been
set up with garage and rear entrances off of the alley. He
noted that this would bring the trash back out on the front
street again and he does not want to see that happen.
Councilman Alongi stated that he does not feel that dark
alleys are safe and they should be lighted, but he is not in
favor of closing the alley.
Mayor Washburn stated that he is also opposed to closing
alleys. He stated that this is more a clean up, protection __
and trash issue. He stated that something is needed to retard
criminal activity and he concurred with the recommendation.
Councilman Pape stated that he felt that it made more sense to
light the area than to close the alley.
Planning Commission Chairwoman Brinley stated that she has an
alley in the back of her house and she and her neighbors
installed lights and it did eliminate a lot of the problems.
Mayor Washburn asked if the City could light the area with
light sensors so that if someone were to come around the
lights would go on and if no one were present, then they would
remain off. Public Services Director Tecca stated that he did
not know if Edison had that type of lighting, but he would
look into it.
Mayor Pro Tem Bender stated that he sees no reason to close
alleys and he does not feel that the City should light or pave
alleys when there are so many other streets to be paved in the
city.
Councilman Alongi stated that alleys and streets are the same
and should be maintained by the city. He explained that
alleys are much less expensive to maintain.
--
Mayor Washburn noted that the consensus of Council appears to
concur with the recommendation of Public Services Director
Tecca and he asked that Lt. Garthwaite direct patrol to go
into that area. He further suggested that the lighting issue
be pursued.
PAGE THREE - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
-
2.
Lake Edge SDecific Plan. (F:150.2)
City Planner Leslie explained that when he came to work with
the City a year ago, the city was working with the County on
the Draft Lake Edge Specific Plan, since a portion of the plan
was in the unincorporated area of Lake Elsinore. He stated
that the intent was that the County and the City would both
adopt the plan at the same time and it would be effective in
both areas. He noted that the County requested that the city
do an updated traffic study and explained that the City had
done a recent traffic study in conjunction with the EIR. City
Planner Leslie stated that it was the city's opinion that the
traffic study could be done as actual development occurred,
however the County wanted to have an update before
development. He explained that the County is in need of a
community Development Plan for Lakeland village and the County
want the City to incorporate a community Plan including
zoning, into the Lake Edge specific Plan for the Lakeland
Village area. city Planner Leslie clarified that the Lake
Edge specific Plan focuses on the Lake Edge only and does not
include the entire area of Lakeland Village.
Joanna Craft of Ballew and Associates, explained that the
Lakeland Village area was concerned about the commercial
section on Grand Avenue as well as their density.
City Planner Leslie explained that the County informed him
that they would not join in with the Lake Edge specific Plan
unless the City developed a Community Plan and did an update
on the Traffic Study. He explained that after staff
consideration it was their opinion to go ahead with the plan;
and the portion that pertains to the County would be advisory
only. He noted that this would be similar to the General Plan
which covers the sphere of influence and is advisory only. If
any of the areas were to annex into the ci ty then the
designations of the Lake Edge Specific Plan would become
effective on those properties. He explained that since all
the discussion wi th the County, qui te a bi t of time has
elapsed and the City's Traffic Engineer suggests that we
pursue an update on the traffic study.
Mayor Washburn stated that if we adopted this plan before
another traffic study was done it would impact Lakeshore Drive
plans. City Planner Leslie explained that one of the major
questions is the roadway around the Specific Plan. He noted
that the plan shows these roadways as four lanes and with
ultimate buildout they are shown as six lanes. He stated that
what was previously discussed was the possibility of
recognizing this as four lanes with a dedication of land that
would allow for six lanes . City Planner Leslie explained that
as development occurs around the Lake this would have to be
improved by the developer and this issue should be decided by
Council prior to the adoption of the Lake Edge Specific Plan.
He explained that then if the city decided later that six
lanes is the standard, the City would have to incur the cost
of the extra lanes.
Mayor Washburn asked if the city adopted a new Traffic study,
whether it would override any other uses proposed on any other
plan. City Planner Leslie explained that the General Plan the
City adopts will have to make findings and all plans will have
to be consistent with the General Plan; and that is why these
issues will have to be resolved. He explained that if the
Council wishes to maintain four lanes, then it will have to be
justified and possibly stated that it is an interim condition
PAGE FOUR - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
and this would gi ve the City the opportunity to have more
lanes in the future if the City should decide to do so.
Public Services Director Tecca explained that the current
roadway system is going to be two twelve foot lanes and a bike
trail. He stated that if the traffic becomes a problem then
the roadway can be restripped, eliminating the bike lane and
converting to three eleven foot lanes.
Mayor Washburn stated that Riverside Drive is Cal-Trans _
jurisdiction and they are calling for 134 feet with six
traffic lanes and a median; and asked if the plan they are in
process of reviewing is consistent with the City's plan.
Councilman Alongi asked about the Elsinore West Marina and the
future dedication of roadway which would put the sewer pumps
in the roadway. He stated that the road width could restrict
the type of development that can be done or make the property
impossible to develop. Councilman Alongi stated because of
this the City should state that it should be four or six lanes
to allow the property owner the right to know what and how
they can develop. Councilman Alongi stated that bike lanes
should be retained at any cost. He noted that the City has
been fighting for bike lanes for a long time and should not
give them up. Public Services Tecca stated that the City's
width is smaller than that required by Cal-Trans.
Councilman Alongi stated that anyone who owns property on
Riverside Drive should be aware of the requirements of Cal-
Trans and the plan should reflect that requirement.
City Manager Molendyk stated that the City has been working on
the Lake Edge Specific Plan for four years and explained that
there are two options for the bike lane; either make a _
decision to have four lanes or six lanes with a bike trail; or
install a separate trail system along the lake edge which
would eliminate the bike lane. City Manager Molendyk stated
that he feels it is important to maintain the bike lane,
either on the road or on a trail system and he address the
view area section of Lakeshore Drive.
Mayor Pro Tem Bender noted that Cal-Trans has jurisdiction on
Riverside Drive up to Ortega Highway and that is most of the
roadway on this plan for the Lake Edge. He stated that he
felt that the roadways were not an issue since the City has to
adopt Cal-Trans road standards and the issue that should be
considered is what will be done on Lakeshore Drive and the
bike lane area.
Councilman Alongi agreed that Lakeshore is the area that needs
the attention. He stated that Cal-Trans should be contacted
and bike lanes should be discussed with them, since Lake
Elsinore is a recreational area.
City Manager Molendyk explained that the tourism study noted
that the bike trail would improve the area and bring people in
for its use. He stated that it is safer to place people along
the Lake Edge and that option should be considered.
....,
Councilman Alongi stated that the problem with placing the
bike lane on the Lake Edge is the level of the Lake and the
fact that the lane would have to be on private property and
has the potential of flooding.
!-
PAGE FIVE - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
-
city Manager Molendyk explained that there would have to be an
easement along the Lake Edge and would not only allow for
recreational uses, but would allow emergency and maintenance
vehicles access as well. He noted that this is a strong
management tool and important access for clean-up and
emergencies.
Ms. Craft explained that in the plan, a bike lane was designed
along the Lake Edge as well as on the roadway.
councilman Alongi stressed that he has a problem with crossing
private property.
City Manager Molendyk explained that because of the open,
undeveloped fields around the Lake there are not a lot of
problems with access for City crews to get to the Lake Edge
for the removal of dead fish, treatment of the water and water
related emergencies such as drowning and injuries; however, in
twenty years that access will not be there and the City needs
to address the problem now by gaining an easement to address
these issues.
-
Mayor Washburn questioned the configuration of the trail and
asked if it would meander in and out of projects along the
Lake Edge. Ms. Craft stated that such standards could be
included in the plan.
City Planner Leslie stated that the Lake Edge Specific Plan is
more of a policy, and specifics for the plan would become
goals and obj ecti ves . He explained that as development occurs
the bike trail can be entered as part of the project.
Mayor Washburn asked if it would be possible to condition for
a conservation easement as each property develops.
ci ty Manager Molendyk stated that at the beginning of the
project the elevation was set at 1240' and then 1249'. He
explained that since the Mystic Lake project has come into
being, there is a possibility that the reclaimed water would
be pumped to that project. city Manager Molendyk explained
that the elevation of the water needs to be firmly established
in order to allow development and potential projects in the
city.
Mayor Pro Tem Bender stated that he sees the bike or walk lane
around the edge of the Lake meandering and curving in and out
of some of the potential projects and along City property and
up and down to the street area at a reasonable elevation. He
further stated that he felt that Council should concentrate on
Lakeshore Drive and address that area first.
-
Mayor Washburn explained that very few single family
residences have direct access to the water; the majority of
the private residences are in the County. He gave a history
of the Lake Edge and questioned the lack of homes with direct
water access in the city. He stated that he would like
Council to look at other options for development.
Councilman Alongi stated that he would not have a problem with
a few homes along the Lake Edge. He stated that it would
improve the value. He stated that the biggest problem the
City will experience is along the County side and the lack of
regulations and enforcement.
City Planner Leslie stated that the objective is not to work
PAGE SIX - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
with the County, but rather to not let their concerns stop the
City from adoption of the plan.
Councilman Alongi stated that the City needs to look at the
access factors for the private property owners.
Mayor Pro Tem Bender stated that his concern is the aesthetic
views of the Lake and the only place that the Lake is visible
is on Lakeshore Drive. He stated that for the most part he
would like to see the roadway on Lakeshore Drive free of any __
development. He stated that this is the only area around the
Lake where people drive by and see the Lake and he feels that
this section provides a visual impact for everyone going in
and out of the City and there is no other area that this can
happen. Mayor Pro Tem Bender stated if homes were allowed to
be built on that area, then that view would be gone forever.
He stated that he did not want a six lane speed way.
Councilman Alongi stated that if a six lane road were planned,
it would not make it impossible for some of the property
owners to develop; and the City would need to do an inverse
condemnation and there would have to be money to purchase the
affected property.
Mayor Washburn asked if the lower road, Acacia st. which runs
parallel to Lakeshore Drive, is City owned. Public Services
Director Tecca stated that it is privately owned.
ci ty Manager Molendyk explained that the local government
financing has changed a lot in the last four years and Council
should consider optimizing the land uses as much as possible.
He noted that Council has directed staff to treat the Lake as
an enterprise account and this makes the land use more
important than it was in the beginning of the program.
Councilman Pape stated that he agrees with Mayor Pro Tem
Bender and explained that if the Lake is going to be
recreational tourist attraction then there should not be more
than three lanes with bike lanes. He noted that all cities
should have bike and jogging lanes. He stated that there is
not room to build homes on the lake edge; and on Riverside
Drive there is room for private development, as well as in
other areas.
-
City Manager Molendyk stated that in the plan public parking
should be considered.
Mayor Washburn asked if it would be possible to get three
lanes on Lakeshore Drive by cutting into the hillside slope.
Public Services Director Tecca stated that Engineering is
looking at two lanes up the slope and two lanes down the
slope.
Councilman Pape asked if three lanes would be adequate.
Public Services Director Tecca stated that the traffic model
shows that there should be four lanes to handle the quantity
of traffic.
Mayor Washburn stated that eventually Strickland Street could
be an alternate route. Public Services Director Tecca
proposed a small split roadway next to the lake. Mayor
Washburn stated that if a roadway is dropped down it will
eliminate the opportunity for any exclusive homes on the
water. He stated that if the City allowed for existing lots
to develop quality single family homes on that area, it would
make the area unique.
-
PAGE SEVEN - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
-
Mayor Pro Tem Bender questioned the lot values.
Councilman Alongi stated that he agrees with Councilman Pape
regarding the three lane roadway to keep traffic at a slower
pace. He stated that just like Canyon Lake there should be
special development plans to develop on the Lake and on the
hillsides which would encourage unique high-end homes. He
stated that he does not feel the City should acquire the
property for a greenbelt. If the city does not wish to
acquire the property then the owners should be apprised of
what they could do.
City Manager Molendyk stated that there is a perception that
the city does not have enough public recreation access now and
as the community grows if the Council wishes to be
tourist/recreational attractive and bring in more public to
use the Lake, he suggested that Council make a list of
suggestions for Ms. Craft and Planning to give them an idea of
what they would like to see.
Ms. Craft stated that she could provide more information
regarding where the Lake level is and how much right-of-way
will be required and how many home sites could be located in
that area. Mayor Washburn asked that she include the view
shed layouts for the Lake.
Mayor Pro Tem Bender stated that he is not opposed to certain
areas being developed, just not a total closure of-the view.
He explained that he would like to see a balance.
-
Ms. Craft asked what the consensus of Council was regarding
Lakeshore Drive. Mayor Washburn stated that he felt. that the
desire was to slow the traffic down and keep it that way
through a three lane roadway with bike lanes.
city Manager Molendyk stated that Council should look at a
plan for 1240' and 1249' elevations.
Councilman Alongi stated that if the Outflow Channel is at
1255' then that is the minimum that should be considered.
Ms. Craft stated that the minimum building elevation is
1263.3' .
City Planner Leslie stated that there is also the stilts
concept for building on the Lake edge. Mayor Washburn stated
that there were those types of homes in that location before.
Councilman Alongi stated that he would not like to see homes
on stilts, but he would like to have the maximum elevation and
how much land will be required for the roadway, then the City
can give the property owner an idea of what they have to build
on and any land which cannot be developed the City can do an
eminent domain action.
-
City Planner Leslie stated that anything less than four or six
lane will create a situation with the traffic model and will
require the City to provide an alternate route for traffic.
Mayor Washburn stated that strickland can be developed to
handle the traffic as an alternate route. Public Services
Director Tecca stated that between 1-15 and the Lake there is
a need to pass 14 lanes of traffic eventually. Mayor Washburn
asked about the development of Pasadena street.
PAGE EIGHT - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
Ci ty Planner Leslie stated that he feels that Council is
asking the Traffic Engineer to go back and remodel the plan to
remove traffic from Lakeshore Drive and allow a lesser number
of lanes and width. He stated that this would have to be done
first in order to give Ms. Craft the information necessary for
her to prepare and present her study regarding the development
potential.
City Manager Molendyk asked Council to place a time frame on __
this project. Mayor Washburn stated that Council will meet
again as soon as Ms. Craft has prepared her study.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY PAPE, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO
ADJOURN THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL M TING AT 10:45 A.M.
i~
VI CKI . Y.....\::iA
LERK
--
-