HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-23-1998 City Council MinutesMINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, JUNE 239 1998
k kxxxkkk *d:xx kaPxx kdex kxx kd: kxk kx kx kd: �':xkxk kx kx k *kkr', k *xk *k:F at it x' at atx k9: a'e aF x'x
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Pape at 7:04 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Manager Watenpaugh.
INVOCATION
None.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ALONGI, BRINLEY,
KELLEY,PAPE
METZE (Councilman Metze
Arrived at 7:17 p.m.)
Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, City Attorney Leibold,
Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director
Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Fire Chief Seabert, Police chief
Walsh Senior Planner Villa, Assistant to the City Manager Best, City
Engineer O'Donnell, and City Clerk Kasad.
PRESENTATIONS
a. Proclamation - Park & Recreation Month. (F:122.1)
Mayor Pape read and presented the Proclamation to Assistant to the City
Manager Best on behalf of Community Services Director Sapp.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS
Requests were received to address the following items:
Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, 21, 22 and 23.
PAGE TWO — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion
and consideration:
Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT
CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. Regular City Council Meeting - May 26, 1998. (17:44.4)
b. Adjourned City Council Meeting - June 3, 1998.
C. City Council Study Session - June 5, 1998.
The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
d. Planning Commission Meeting - May 6, 1998. (17:60.3)
e. Design Review Committee Meeting - May 6, 1998. (17:60.4)
f. Public Scoping Meeting - June 8, 1998. (F:151.1)
2. Ratified Warrant List for June 15, 1998. (F: 12.3)
6. Accepted Notice of Completion for McVicker Canyon Debris Basin and
Line `B -1" Channel (Stage 4) - Greg Harris Construction; and authorized
staff to record the Notice. (17:22.3)
10. Approved Public Hearing date of July 28, 1998, for the following:
a. Collection of delinquent refuse service fees of customers with unpaid
balances to be collected on the annual property tax roll. (17:163.1)
PUBLIC HEARING
21. Community Facilities District 98 -1 - Summerhill Improvements
(Overlay District CFD 91 -2) - Resolution Nos. 98 -15 and 98 -16. (F:22.3)
City Manager Watenpaugh noted the efforts to develop a financial work out
plan and the relationship of those efforts to this item.
Don Hunt, Bond Counsel, highlighted this item and noted that all of the
land involved is held by Abaccy. He explained that the purpose of this
District is to cover a portion of the delinquent taxes not previously
collected, and that the primary beneficiary of the District will be the
PAGE THREE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
bondholders.
Mayor Pape opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m., asking those persons
interested in this item to speak. The following person spoke:
Winifred Zieler, 31662 Willow View Place, resident of Summerhill, noted
the paperwork she received from Friedman Homes, and indicated that she
bought the house for cash and ended up with $60,000 in Mello -Roos fees.
She further noted that the covenants for Summerhill run with the land until
2014, with the potential for a 10 year automatic extension. She also noted
water related assessments and suggested that there is a lot of fraud and
dishonesty. She indicated that she does not have the original paperwork or
disclosures on the house, but does have copies of documents from Friedman
Homes. She further indicated that she will end up paying $180,000 for
the house, even though she paid cash. She expressed uncertainty as to
whether her deed is even valid.
Hearing no additional requests to speak, the public hearing was closed at
7:15 p.m.
Mayor Pape stressed that this item would have no impact on the current
homeowners. Mr. Hunt reiterated that this District does not include any of
the existing single - family homes. He also noted that with regard to
receiving documents, the lien for special taxes is recorded with the
Recorder's Office when the tax is levied and recorded on every included lot
as public record. He indicated that State law requires written disclosures
and the title policy will always have a reference with regard to the tax lien.
He further indicated that the City has done everything properly, but there
may be a cause of action against the seller if they did not comply with the
requirements. Mayor Pape noted that Mrs. Zieler has discussed this before,
and the previous City Attorney volunteered time to assist her. He
commented that his has been an ongoing problem for the Zieler Family, but
this action has no impact on the private property owners.
Councilman Alongi inquired whether Mr. Kipp has deposited the required
funds. Mr. Hunt indicated that he had not yet deposited, but this action is to
the benefit of the bondholders, not Mr. Kipp. He stressed that this is an
advantageous action for the bondholders and the City to have the bonds
paid off. Councilman Alongi inquired whether the Lake Elsinore
Management Authority would be the underwriter for these bonds. Mr.
Hunt indicated that the Public Finance Authority would underwrite the
bonds, and noted that there is sufficient value to support the issue. He
clarified that these bonds would be anticipated to be 2 or 3 years down the
road; as they will not be issued on raw land, only on occupied homes. He
indicated that this issuance is being put together differently from the others.
Councilman Alongi addressed Mrs. Zieler and indicated that when people
buy homes a lot of documents are overlooked due to lack of knowledge
PAGE FOUR — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
regarding CFD's, but most people who sell homes do not emphasize those
points either. He suggested that while the State law requires disclosures,
people need to stay aware and informed. He concurred that this was a very
confusing and costly situation, which could cause people to loose their
homes. He suggested that the developers need to have the funds up front to
provide necessary improvements. Councilwoman Brinley noted past
discussions of this concern and suggested that future buyers receive better
explanations and disclosures. She suggested requiring that the disclosures
be filed with the City to protect the residents and new homeowners. She
thanked Mr. Hunt for his time and efforts to protect the City's trustees.
Councilman Metze requested clarification of the time frame for this bond
issuance. Mr. Hunt indicated that it would be approximately three years, or
at the time the homes are built. Councilman Metze inquired whether the
matter would be back to Council before there is further action. Mr. Hunt
confirmed, noting that this action creates the District for later use, if bonds
are needed.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BOND COUNSEL REPORT
AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 98 -15 AND 98 -16. METZE ARRIVED
AT 7:17 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, DETERMINING THE VALIDITY OF PRIOR
PROCEEDINGS, ESTABLISHING COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 98 -19 AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL
TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1,
AND ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, ACTING ON BEHALF OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 98 -1, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION.
22. 1998 -99 City Wide Annual Budget — Resolution No. 98 -17 and RDA
Resolution No. 98 -1. (F:30.1)
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that this item was heard at a Study Session
on June 5, 1998, and the changes presented are the items that have been
modified since the Study Session, as well as services added. He explained
that in the staff report he has listed, page by page, the changes that he
suggests for the Council's Budget. He recommended that the City retain
membership with the organizations the City is presently involved in due to
their contributions to the City and it's economic development. He gave
PAGE FIVE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
overview of the items. listed in the staff report as follows:
Page 12 — City Council
The following general memberships have been included within the City
Council's budget.
WRCOG
WETIP
League of California Cities
CALED
IEEP
IETC
Total
Page 17 —City Manager
City Economic Development
Local EDC
Regional Economic Development
$4,000
1,530
4,500
400
7,000
250
$17,680 ($10,000 increase)
$15,000
5,000
5,000 added per Council request
Page 34 — Public Works Facilities Maintenance
- Transferred from Senior Center $6,500
Page 35 — Vehicle & Equipment Repair
Addition of three leased vehicles for Maintenance — full size 4X4 pickups.
Auction three Celebrity vehicles and three 5 -10 pickups.
Page 37 — Community Center
Addition of operating expenses for
reopening the Community Center $47,000
(Capital funds budgeted in Capital Budget from Park In -Lieu Fees).
Park -in -Lieu Capital Funds — Community
Center Renovation
$121,930 approved by Council
Page 39 — Senior Center
Transferred to Public Works Facility Maintenance $6,500 reduction
Added $20,000 from Park -in -Lieu Capital Funds for tree lighting in
Downtown Core Blocks (Main Street).
PAGE SIX — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23, 1998
Authorized additional staff, per page 1 summary of Budgets, plus additional
Maintenance Worker I for Campground.
City Manager Watenpaugh gave an overview of the Capital Projects Budget and
explained the proposed projects. City Manager Watenpaugh presented a Summary
of the Budget as follows:
General Fund $9,281,300
New: '/z time Code En£ ( =1 full time)
h time graffiti
1 full time Streets Maint.
1 full time Associate Engineer
Part-time — Community Center
Economic Development
Redevelopment Agency
$6,990,000
Lake Operations
$349,700
TMC 150,000
Campground 50,000
LLMD
CIP
$549,400
$1,157,000
$2,581,930
TOTAL CITY BUDGETS
$20,559,930
$8,836,900 +443,400
$ 24,000
20,000
34,000
68,000
47,000
20,000 2311000
$7,745,500 (775,500)
$516,200
200,000 (166,500)
$716,200
$1,157,000 -0-
$2,581,9301 -0-
Expense
$9,854,900 231,400
7,745,500 (755,500)
716,200 -0-
1 ,157,000
2,581,930
$22,055,530 (690,600)
Revenue
General Fund
$9,281,300
RDA
6,990,000
Lake Operations
& Campground
549,700
LLMD
1,1571000
CIP
2.581.930
$20,559,930
$8,836,900 +443,400
$ 24,000
20,000
34,000
68,000
47,000
20,000 2311000
$7,745,500 (775,500)
$516,200
200,000 (166,500)
$716,200
$1,157,000 -0-
$2,581,9301 -0-
Expense
$9,854,900 231,400
7,745,500 (755,500)
716,200 -0-
1 ,157,000
2,581,930
$22,055,530 (690,600)
PAGE SEVEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23, 1998
Reserve Fund
Projected Balance June 30 "' 1999 $1,416,400
Items reduced from Reserve Fund 1997/98
-Parks $211,000
- Spectrum Settlement
127,500
- Stadium
108,000
- Attorney's Fees 230,000
-Law Enforcement Contract 150,000
$826,500
Mayor Pape opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. and asked those persons
interested in speaking to do so.
Dale Hite, 155 N. Kellogg Street, commented on the improvement in the
budget, but indicated that he felt the Council should spend the money on
Public Safety and less on other things. He stated that Council has the
appropriate funding for a Fire Station and he feels that the City should
proceed. He asked that Council take the safety of the citizens into
consideration first.
Mayor Pape asked if anyone else wished to speak on the issue, hearing no
one, the public hearing was closed at 7:40 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley asked what the revenue increase has been for this
year. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that the increase was a little over
$900,000. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley questioned the amount saved with the
lease of the Stadium. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that the City has
eliminated $500,000 in expenditures. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley noted that
there was a Study Session regarding the budget and the Council has gone
through the budget line by line. She further noted that the Capital Projects
are not from the General Funds, but rather from other funding sources. She
stated that she is delighted that because of strict budgeting, Council is able
to add the Community Center to this year's budget. She explained that
there are a lot of positive things in the budget and noted that the City is
bringing back the Graffiti Program, restoring partial use of the Campground
and bringing on another Code Enforcement Officer. She stated that there is
a light at the end of the tunnel and next year she hopes it will be even better.
Councilwoman Brinley concurred with Mayor Pro Tern Kelley and
expressed her pleasure with the additions that were made in the budget. She
noted that the Redevelopment Agency is getting back to the point where it
is possible to bring the Agency back into the black. She made note of the
Redevelopment Agency Main Street Project and the lights that were placed
in the trees to add to the atmosphere of the Downtown Area. She asked that
PAGE EIGHT — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
Council consider allocation of $20,000 to replace the lights in the trees on
Main Street. She gave an overview of the available funds in the budget and
noted that she felt that this would enhance the area. She further noted that it
is much nicer to approach the budget this year by adding items to the
budget, instead of deleting items. She highlighted the funds that are in the
budget for Public Safety and indicated that she felt that there was
considerable consideration given to that area.
Councilman Alongi stated that there were more important things for RDA
money then putting lights back into the trees on Main Street. He stated that
he felt that the League of California Cities and WRCOG were important to
the City, however he felt that the money allocated for the other
organizations could better be spent for sidewalks. He noted that $20,000
was allocated for EDC, and he felt that this could be cut in half. He further
noted the request for three 4x4 pickups and explained that there is no need
for that type of vehicle in Lake Elsinore. He stressed his opposition to the
previously purchased 4x4 pickup and stated that the City did not need more
than one of that type of vehicle. He indicated that the funds could be better
spent elsewhere. He noted that it appears that the School District will start
charging children to ride the school buses and it is the City's obligation to
have better sidewalks leading to the schools, especially for the lower grades.
He stated his pleasure in reopening the Community Center, but felt that the
money from the Senior Center should be spent on sidewalks and the
$20,000 that Councilwoman Brinley suggested for lighting would be better
applied to sidewalks, as well as handicap ramps. He noted that there are a
lot of areas in the City without sidewalks such as Lakeshore Drive, and
Sumner Avenue to name a few. He explained that sidewalks should come
first and then the Council can look at the "gingerbread" later. Councilman
Alongi stated that he felt staff and City Manager Watenpaugh did a good
job with the budget, considering the handicap that they had to work with
caused from the Lake, _Stadium and other projects that drained City funds.
He noted that the Council should save every dollar they can and put it where
it can do the most good. He further noted problems with potholes, as well
as streets that have not been paved in 25 years or snore. He commented on
the funds that are spent on the Capital Improvement Projects and noted that
the streets in the older part of the City are ignored every time, and indicated
that therefore he would be voting against the page that lists Capital
Improvement Projects.
Councilman Metze thanked staff and the City Manager for listening to
Council and addressing the suggestions. He stressed that what is being
presented is not found money, rather it is due to an aggressive economic
plan. He noted that the businesspersons on Main Street are pleased with the
City and Chamber and the trend in the economy. He stated that he feels that
the tree lights are important to Main Street to add to the effect that is trying
to be maintained and would benefit the businesses, as well as protecting the
PAGE NINE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
investment in the Downtown area.
Mayor Pape noted the section of the budget that addresses Memberships to
Organizations and explained that although this shows an increase, these are
not new items. He explained that the City has always been a member of the
listed organizations, however they were not itemized in the budget, but were
paid by other sources within the budget. Mayor Pape felt that this should be
addressed as a separate item and the City should continue to be members.
He further explained the allocation for the local EDC, since they have been
very aggressive and contributed to the local economy which is a direct
benefit to the City. He stated that he would like to see the City support
regional economic development because as the economy improves this will
serve to attract more businesses to our City. He noted that the money taken
from the Senior Center and placed in Public Works is a bookkeeping item
and the money will still be spent on the same thing. Mayor Pape addressed
Capital Improvement Projects and noted the roads which will be improved,
as well as signalization in the City. Mayor Pape commented on the trucks
and explained that the old trucks will be taken to auction and offset some of
the cost with the revenue they generate at the sale. He noted that by adding
an additional Code Enforcement Officer it will be possible to have coverage
on weekends and that will help the City as well. He noted that the sales tax
revenue is the largest source of revenue for the City, and explained the
State's past action regarding property taxes and the fact that the majority of
the money is now given to the Schools; therefore the sales tax revenue is
vital to the City.
Councilwoman Brinley explained the use of park fees and the restricted
uses.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A
VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSNTING VOTE, TO
APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BUDGET AS CORRECTED, INCLUDING THE CAPITAL PROJECTS
BUDGET WITH AMENDMENTS TO PARK IN LIEU FEES OF $209000 TO
BE SPENT ON LIGHTS IN THE TREES ON MAIN STREET AND $59000
TO BE ALLOCATED TO REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-17 AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSLINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 AND APPROPRIATING THE
FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE EXPENDIUTRES SET
FORTH THEREIN.
PAGE TEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
RDA RESOLUTION NO. 98 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APAPROVING TAND
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 AND
APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE
EXPENDITURES SET FORTH THEREIN.
23. General Plan Amendment No. 98 -1 and Zone Change 98 -1 Assessor's
Parcel Number 373 - 071 -018. (F:83.2)(X:172.2) _
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item.
Mayor Pape opened the Public Hearing at 8:05 p.m., asking those persons
interested in this item to speak. Hearing no one, the Public Hearing was
closed at 8:05 p.m.
Councilman Alongi expressed concern that the City reduces the zoning in
areas such as this, when there is a need for affordable housing. He
indicated that the City is slowly, but surely phasing out any type of multiple
family housing in the City. He concurred that property owners should be
able to use their property as they choose, but stressed that the City has an
obligation to provide housing for all income levels. He expressed
disappointment with the loss of multi- family housing sites; and indicated
that this Council and the previous Council have removed those
opportunities. Mayor Pape indicated that this is a prime area for
commercial development and it will provide jobs for area residents;
resulting in a positive move for the City. Councilwoman Brinley noted the
possibility of an auto dealership, which would be compatible with the other
development in the area, and stressed that this would provide commercial
business and jobs, and create sales tax dollars and property tax dollars. She
stressed the need to go out and aggressively encourage this type of
development to provide jobs. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley indicated that she has
no problem with this request, as Commercial zoning is more compatible
with the surrounding area. She responded positively to the fact that there is
interest in the property by an auto dealership.
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY KELLEY TO APPROVE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 98 -1, APPROVE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 98 -1, ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
98 -18, APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 98 -1 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE
NO. 1038 UPON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY, BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
Findings — General Plan Amendment 98 -1
The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the
health, safety, comfort or general` welfare of the persons residing or working
within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City; or
b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within
the City.
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable
development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the
area more compatible with adjacent properties.
3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density
and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access and
constraints.
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on
the environment.
Findings —Zone Change 98 -1
The proposed zone change will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City; or b) injurious
to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the General Plan and the standards established in the Municipal
Code.
This project will not have a significant impact on the environment.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98 -1 TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF APN 373 - 071 -018 FROM MEDIUM HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
ORDINANCE NO. 1038
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE ZONING OF
PAGE TWELVE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
9.11 GROSS ACRES ALONG FRANKLIN STREET FROM R -3
(HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING) TO C -2 (GENERAL.
COMMERCIAL) - ZONE CHANGE NO. 98 -1.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, BRINLEY,
KELLEY, METZE, PAPE
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
BUSINESS ITEMS
31. Lake Elsinore Series A Bonds /Tolling_ Agreement. (F:126.5)
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item and explained the
restructuring of the CFD's to get the current default back in order. He
explained that this action helps to avoid litigation. Mr. Hunt confirmed Mr.
Watenpaugh's explanation and indicated that this agreement is a very
positive sign for the City, as initially the trustee was opposed to this action,
but now supports the proposal and recommended that the bondholders go
along with the agreement. He explained that the agreement protects the
rights of the bondholders and the City, with no one filing litigation while
the restructuring proceeds. He stressed that this is a very positive move
with no down side.
MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED_ BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE AND ENTER INTO THE TOLLING
AGREEMENT WITH BNY WESTERN TRUST COMPANY OF
CALIFORNIA.
32. Community Facilities District —Goals and Policy Statement. (F:22.1)
City Manager Watenpaugh explained that the City has not formed a new
Community Facilities District since 1994, however the City has restructured
some existing CFDs. He noted that State Legislation was enacted in
January 1, 1994, which required adoption of local Goals and Policies when
establishing new districts. He noted that as part of the agreement to
restructure a new CFD for the old Summerhill Tract, the City is required to
develop a Goals and Policy Statement for Council's review and
consideration. He explained that the Council can modify or change it
should something not work the way they anticipated it to work.
PAGE THIRTEEN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
Don Hunt, representing Fullbright and Jaworski, Bond Counsel, stressed
that tonight or anytime in the future the Council is free at their discretion to
amend or repeal these Goals and Policies and adopt new ones. He noted
that if Council desires to change any item the changes could be made by his
firm.
City Manager Watenpaugh asked Council to disregard pages 11 and 12 of
the report as presented.
Councilman Metze stated that he would like some changes as follow:
Page two — III - Eligible Public Facilities He explained that he would
like to see a second category which discourages the use of bond
money for Parks, Government facilities and Recreation facilities,
including golf courses.
Page 3 —V —Disclosure Requirements He would like to seethe
seller give the buyer the option to add the cost of the Community
Facilities District to the cost of the house or to pay it up front. This
gives the buyer the ability to make a decision and it would be part of
the disclosure.
Councilwoman Brinley asked if this would be the proper time, after the
disclosure is signed, that a copy be given to the City for file. Councilman
Metze stated that rather than having all that paper on file, the City Manager
would be able to acquire a disclosure statement on any given piece of
property upon demand. This would relieve staff from being responsible for
that documentation. He stated that the disclosure statement should define
the purpose of the fee and would clarify that the money would go for the
construction of the facility, not the staffing and maintenance.
Councilman Metze further requested amendment of the policy as follows:
He suggested having the Section that addresses the ability to enact an
annual increase of 2% be changed to 1 % as a preference of the City.
He noted that the State of California allows 2% and the City can set a
tighter limitation on this amount. Mr. Hunt clarified this item.
Councilman Metze explained that the problems the residents have
experienced with Community Facilities Districts are because they were not
handled properly through disclosure.
Councilwoman Brinley stated that she felt the disclosure statements should
be filed with the City so that any problem can be taken care of in a timely
manner and the problem can be addressed immediately instead of making
the homeowner wait.
PAGE FOURTEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23, 1998
Councilman Metze stated that there was a period of time that Community
Facilities Districts were unpopular, however with the economy picking up
they are being formed at a greater rate. He noted that with his suggestions,
it will take special consideration to have anything other than infrastructure
placed into a CFD and that protects the residents.
City Manager Watenpaugh requested clarification of the requirement for the
City to have copies of the signed Disclosure Statements. Councilman
Metze stated that he did not feel this was necessary, however it could
change if the information is not made available in a timely manner.
Mayor Pape stated that he felt it was inappropriate for the City to become
involved in private transactions. He explained that if someone is buying a
house, it is up to the buyer to understand the deal that they are involving
themselves in and the paperwork that they are signing; and if they don't,
they need to consult an attorney. He stated that he doesn't know if the City
should act as big brother and stand looking over someone's shoulder to
question whether the buyer understands what they are signing, serving as a
backup for them.
City Manager Watenpaugh stated that he understands the concern of
Council, however in Section V., first paragraph at the end it states: "Such
disclosure shall include home buyer notifications requiring signature prior
to home purchases, as well as methods to notify subsequent home
purchasers." He stated that he did not know how the City could accomplish
this for subsequent homebuyers.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley complimented Mr. Hunt for putting together such a
inclusive policy package and agreed with Councilman Metze regarding the
Parks, Governmental facilities, Libraries, Police and fire protection
facilities, and Recreation facilities, including golf courses and placing them
in a separate category. She explained that she found the Disclosure
Requirements on page three very complete and agreed with Mayor Pape that
it is not the City's decision nor burden to collect signed documents for
every household in the community. She stated that this can be handled on a
case by case basis.
Councilman Metze asked how we enforce the statement: "The applicant will
be required to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City, that there will be
full disclosure..."
Councilman Alongi stated that it all depends on what is meant by
"demonstrate ". He noted that people are more aware of the meaning of a
Mello -Roos and Community Facilities Districts; and he feels that the
Council is right, that the City has. no business interfering in business
between the buyer and seller. He stated that he would like to see that it is
PAGE FIFTEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
fully explained to the buyer what the Mello -Roos is and the assessments on
those properties, however if the City Manager gets a complaint he can get
documentation from the County Hall of Records. He noted that it is hard
enough time keeping track of the City, let alone all the houses that will be
sold in the community. He asked if 1,000 houses were planned and only
300 were built, would the 300 homes share in the total of the assessment of
the Mello -Roos. He asked Mr. Hunt to clarify. Mr. Hunt explained that at
the time the Mello -Roos is established, part of the proceeding is to establish
the maximum special tax that can be levied with respect to the property. He
noted that the 300 homeowners can only share in the overall cost of the
extended maximum special tax. He further explained that normally it's
structured so that public improvements will not be put in at once, but rather
over a period of time as the construction of the District was taking place.
He stated that this is done to protect 300 homes from having to pay the
maximum. Councilman Alongi noted that is the problem that has been
experienced in Tuscany Hills and is the reason why Council is taking this
action. He noted that the reason for placing items listed on page three of the
Policy on a Mello -Roos is because the bank does not recognize those as
debts, as they only look at the selling price. They do not look at the Mello -
Roos or the Community Facilities District, therefore when the City asks the
Developer to withdraw the cost of Parks, Government Facilities, Libraries,
Police and fire protection facilities, Recreation facilities, and golf courses
from the CFD, they won't do it because the Developer must increase the
price of the house to meet the cost and would not be able to sell it easily.
He stated the reason for a CFD is to reduce the cost of the house to enable
the Developer to sell it, however the owner does not realize that the cost
will appear on their taxes. He stated that he feels that Council is getting into
an area where they do not belong and it is buyer beware. He stated that it is
none of his business what the assessments are as long as the facilities are
there. That cost is between the buyer and seller and not the City.
City Manager Watenpaugh clarified the existing CFDs and how they are
structured.
Councilman Metze stated that possibly the Tuscany Hills situation could
have been avoided if the Developer had some of his own money tied up in
the project. He noted that Friedman found it easy to just walk away since
he had none of his own money tied up in the project. He stated that he
would like some way to work with the property owner to help them. He
asked Mr. Hunt if the City would be responsible to prove that the developer
demonstrated to the City the disclosure if a buyer takes the City to court.
Mr. Hall stated that this issue would be addressed at the time of financing
by the developer and the developer would be required to indemnify the
City.
City Manager Watenpaugh stated that staff will do what they can, however
PAGE SIXTEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
there are limits to what staff can accomplish.
Councilman Metze stated that the requirement for a down payment insures
that the buyer invests his own money in the home and the same rule applies
if Council requires the developer to assist in providing facilities. He noted
that the Developer will have invested some of his own money and will not
find it easy to file bankruptcy and walls away as they have done with a bond
that they have no money invested in. He stated that it is not that the items
are eliminated, however they are discouraged.
Mr. Hunt explained that the State has laws and enforcement procedures and
he felt that it would be cost prohibitive for the City to try to enforce the
disclosure. He stated that his recommendation would be to contractually
acquire the agreement rather than enforce it.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley stated that this does not exclude the City from
coming to the aid of someone who didn't understand the situation. She
stated that she felt that the disclosure requirements were quite adequate and
if someone needs some help this does not prevent the City from trying to
help.
Councilwoman Brinley asked how to get the Developer to go out and do
what is needed if it is not part of a CFD. Councilman Metze stated that the
buyer does not have to pay the fees that are discouraged, however the
Developer must see that they are paid. Councilwoman Brinley noted such
things as Police and Fire need to remain on the list because they really do
need to be funded. Councilman Metze stated they would be there, however
what he is saying is just not by a bond.
There was general discussion in regard to how the developer provides
facilities and through what source.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley explained that Council hears each development on a
case by case basis and it can be decided at that time what will be allowed
and what will not.
Councilwoman Brinley suggested leaving the Goals and Policies as
presented, however when a developer appears before the Planning
Commission, they have the option of using the verbiage the Mayor used.
Councilman Metze stated that if it is not part of the policy, then the City is
singling out one developer over another.
Councilman Alongi stated that if the City involves itself in peoples private
business, it will get into trouble. He explained that the City is not there to
bargain for individual rights. He further explained that the Developer does
have money in a project since when they apply for a construction loan they
PAGE SEVENTEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
have then made a major investment. He asked what would happen if only
80% of the facilities can be bonded, what happens if the Developer goes
broke and the facilities are not completed. He explained that even though
he disagrees with the use of bonds, at least the City would have the money
up front to construct Government facilities. However if the developer,
without the benefit of bonds, built 400 out of 1000 homes and went broke
there would be no construction of Government facilities and in order to
have Government facilities, the City would have to foot the bill.
Councilman Alongi stated that cities should not get involved in the
construction of any residential or commercial project. He noted that the
City's job is to provide the permits and requirements to build the project.
He stated that the City will receive no more than the property tax which
does not cover the services required for the area. He stated that Mr. Hunt
has done a good job of putting this Goals and Policies together and Council
should listen to them since that is why the City pays them a great deal of
money to guide the Council.
Councilman Metze stated that he spoke with Mr. Hunt prior to the meeting
and clarified that Mr. Hunt felt that the issues he addressed were good
issues. Mr. Hunt stated that he had informed Councilman Metze that it was
not inappropriate for City Council to state that it was their policy to require
a developer to have their own equity in a project and get the support of
financing, but it would be at the discretion of the Council to use all or any
of the policy. He noted that it was prepared for Council consideration and it
is Council's decision to change however they choose.
There was general discussion in regard to the use of Community Facilities
Districts and Mello -Roos.
MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY BRINLEY TO APPROVE AND
ADOPT THE STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT —
GOALS AND POLICY WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS:
Page 2 — III — Eligible Public Facilities.
The addition of a second category that discourages the use of bond
money for Parks, Government facilities, Libraries, Police and Fire
Protection facilities and Recreation facilities, including golf courses.
Page 3 — V — Disclosure Requirements
The seller gives the buyer the option to add the cost of the Community
Facilities to the cost of the house or to pay it up front; giving the buyer
the ability to make a decision.
And add a section that addresses the ability to enact an annual raise of
PAGE EIGHTEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23,1998
2% be changed to 1% as a preference of the City. He noted that the
State of California allows 2% and the City can set a tighter limitation
on this amount.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley stated that she felt Mr. Hunt's comments about
developer equity are most appropriate and involves the Council as much as
it should be.
Councilwoman Brinley suggested that at some later date a Study Session
should be set to review the Goals and Policy after Council has had the
opportunity to work with them for this Community Facilities District.
Councilman Alongi clarified equity.
THE FOREGOING MOTION WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1
WITH METZE CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE.
33. Planning Commission Appointments. (F:60.2)
Mayor Pape noted that there are two terms expiring on the Planning
Commission, for which three applications were received. He indicated that
the two current commissioners have submitted applications, in addition to
Robert Magee. He further indicated that he met with Mr. Magee this
morning and his is a very good applicant with good qualifications, however,
the existing Commissioners have_ done a good job for the City. He
recommended the reappointment of Commissioners Al Wilsey and Robert
Schiffner to full terms continuing to June, 2002.
MOVED BY PAPE, SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO REAPPOINT COMMISSIONERS WILSEY AND
SCHIFFNER TO FULL PLANNING COMMISSION TERMS
CONTINUING TO JUNE, 2002.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:50 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:00 P.M.
ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
3 Award of Contract - Mission Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project. - R.J.
Noble Company - $349,645. (F:15.62)
City Manager Watenpaugh explained this item and requested authorization
to award the contract to the low bidder.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he pulled this item to note that this is the
PAGE NINETEEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
third time Mission Trail has been done; and while he understands the
location, there have been problems in the past. He noted a past project
where negotiations resulted in the City and EVMWD splitting the cost in
half. He indicated that he did not disagree that work is needed, but there
are other streets which have had no asphalt in 4o years. He noted that with
this project it will total nearly $1 million in expenditures since 1992. He
opposed this expenditure.
Linda Nanetti, Cimarron Road, addressed a newspaper article concerning
the City's debt and the Redevelopment Agency. She questioned the use of
R.J. Noble, and inquired if they would be utilizing local residents to work
on the project. She suggested that a lot of the construction, pavement and
redevelopment improvements could be handled by many of the residents
who are currently out of work.
City Attorney Leibold rioted that State law requires competitive bidding and
acceptance of the lowest responsible bidder. She explained that the City
cannot dictate how the bidders operate their business, but can encourage the
use of local residents.
City Manager Watenpaugh concurred with the City Attorney, and
commented that although there has been past discussion to request local
projects try to hire local people, there is no requirement that they comply.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO
1 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO ACCEPT THE BID OF R.J.
NOBLE COMPANY AND AWARD THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $349,645
FOR MISSION TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION.
4. Award of Contract - Fiscal Year 1997 -98 SB821 Sidewalk & Pedestrian
Ramp Improvements - EGN Construction, Inc. - $47,950. (F: 146.2)
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item, and indicated that the
project is located near Elsinore Elementary School and Yarborough Park.
He advised that the Engineer's estimate was $42,000, three bids were
received, and the low bid was from EGN Construction in the amount of
$47,950. He recommended the transfer of Gas Tax funds to assist in
funding the project.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he pulled this item because he didn't have
information as to where the sidewalks were, except in vicinity of the
elementary school. He also indicated that the bids were higher than the
estimate, and noted that this was the first time he had seen that. He stressed
the importance of knowing what streets, sidewalks and ramps are included
in the project; and noted that he would appreciate receiving that information
in his packet next time.
PAGE TWENTY — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
MOVED BY ALONGI, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF $69450.00
FROM THE GAS TAX ACCOUNT TO THE 1997 -98 SB 821 PROJECT
ACCOUNT AND AWARD THE CONTRACT TO E.G.N. CONSTRUCTION
IN THE AMOUNT OF $475950.00.
5. Award of Contract - Strickland Avenue Guard Rail Barricade - Chrisp
Company - $14,020. (F:156.2)
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item, noting that it will protect
three homes on the northerly side of the street. He advised that the
Engineer's estimate for the 330 feet of guardrail was $14,000; and only one
bid was received for $14,020.
Councilman Alongi indicated that if he was correct there were already
arrows in place for the curbs. He questioned the last time any car ran off
the road into the three houses. He noted that this road has been therefor 35
years and there are other areas where the money could be spend on
sidewalks, etc. He stressed that there are arrows indicating that there is a
curve there, and the road was there when the houses were built.
Councilwoman Brinley indicated that there is a public safety issue to
address. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley noted that this was funded in last year's
budget.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY A
VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE
TO AWARD THE STRICKLAND AVENUE GUARD RAIL PROJECT TO
CHRISP COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $149020.
7. Lot Line Adjustment between Tract 22912 and City's Future Fire Station
Lot on Lincoln Street. (F: 160.2)(X: 127.3)
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item, and indicated that staff has
recommended the adjustment to transfer the lot line from the bottom of the
slope to the top of the slope, to ensure that the slope will ultimately be
maintained.
Councilman Alongi suggested that this was the City again transferrring the
burden of responsibility from the private property owner to the City. He
indicated that it did not just appear, it was there; and could be assess to the
LLMD to guarantee maintenance of the slope. He stressed that this was
private property agreed to in the tract snap. He expressed concern that the
citizens will pay to maintain the slope when it should be addressed by the
property owners.
PAGE TWENTY -.ONE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A
VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE
DOCUMENT.
8. Memorandum of Understanding with United Public Employees of
California - LIUNA Local 777 for Fiscal Years 1997 -98 and 1998 -99.
(F:116.3)
City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item and noted that the
proposed Memorandum had been negotiated and ratified by the employees.
He advised that the agreement was for a 2 year contract with a 1.8% cost of
living increase and medical and dental insurance increases for a total
package of 2.22% in the first year; and a 2.5% total package for 1998 -99.
Councilman Alongi indicated that he needed to explain his vote on this
item, as he believes that every area should be considered when the City has
financial problems. He concurred that the City has good employees, but it
is important to hit every area to save a dollar. He indicated that there comes
a time when the Council should be unanimous, even when they disagree and
this is one of those times.
MOVED BY ALONGI, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING WITH UNITED PUBLIC EMPLOYEES OF
CALIFORNIA — LIUNA LOCAL 777 FOR THE PERIOD, 1997 -99, AS
PRESENTED.
9. Closure of Summerhill Drive. (F:156.1)
City Manager Watenpaugh explained this item, and expressed appreciation
to the Council for pulling it from the Consent Calendar, as it should have
been a Business Item to gain direction from the City Council.
Councilman Alongi indicated that Tuscany Hills is within the City of Lake
Elsinore and those are all public streets, and everyone makes sacrifices.
during the year for the benefit of the Community. He noted that some of the
races require complete closure of some areas. He suggested that it was
irresponsible for residents to think there is a need to close off public streets,
as everyone pays taxes to maintain streets; and indicated it was not fair to
close them just because a group has the ear of the Council and receives
special treatment. He indicated that Summerhill Drive should remain open
unless there is a race on it. He further indicated that last year it was
arbitrarily closed, and suggested that it was completely irresponsible to
deny residents a place to watch the fireworks.
PAGE TWENTY -TWO — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998,
Mayor Pape indicated that while he has not discussed the matter with
Tuscany Hills residents; they are not really equipped to handle large
amounts of traffic or crowds, noting the problems experienced in years
when it was not closed. He specifically noted the lacy of restroom facilities
and potential for hazards on the 4t' of July; and suggested that it seemed like
a reasonable request for any such area.
Councilwoman Brinley noted that this road is subject to closure for races
and this is a time when they are heavily impacted and should be assisted.
She indicated that this closure would be at no cost to the City, and the
homeowners association will pay for the police officer. She concurred that
everyone is impacted by special events in one way or another, but stressed
the past problems which have been encountered in that area. She suggested
that if the residents are willing to pay for expenses, then they should be
allowed to do so.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE TO APPROVE
CLOSURE OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE FOR THE JULY 4 T HOLIDAY AS
REQUESTED.
Councilman Alongi addressed Councilwoman Brinley and indicated that he
did not disagree, but a few inconsiderate people should not spoil the
celebration for others. He indicated that most people park some distance
from the residences. He suggested that the Council would be wrong to
approve this closure and set themselves up for problems in other areas.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley requested an estimate as to how many cars try to go
up there and inquired whether there has been problems in the past. Chief
Walsh indicated that there have been problems in years past, including
parking, no restrooms, and the generation of a good deal of traffic. He
indicated that there is a park in the area which could be open to all, but the
road closure prevents other problems.
THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH
ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 9:30 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:32 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS
Candy Schmitt, 15227 Washington Avenue, stated that there has been some traffic
enforcement made in her area, however it has been done in a very limited basis.
She noted that after the traffic monitor was removed enforcement was aggressive
for about three or four days, however since that time there has been no
PAGE TWENTY- THREE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
enforcement at all. She further stated that it is the responsibility of the Council to
see to the safety of the citizens and she felt that some stop signs might assist in
slowing traffic. She further suggested that there are other cities that use speed
bumps in problem neighborhoods and the City could research the possibility of
that use. She invited Council to come and sit in her front yard and watch the traffic
that speeds up and down the street.
Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, disagreed that the City is in good financial
shape and noted a lawsuit against the City for $2.4 that was recently awarded to a
local citizen. She further noted that there is another lawsuit pending against the
City that may be greater than $2.4 million. She stated that if the City appeals the
interest will continue on the amount. She cautioned the tax payer that this is not
paid by the insurance company, but rather from the General Fund, since the RDA
has no money.
Desiree O'Neill, 15253 Washington Avenue, stated that all of the suggestions that
she has made to resolve the traffic problems on her street have been dismissed as
not possible and she stated her frustration with the entire situation. She noted that
for buyers to move into their homes, the City had to approve the safety of the
streets, therefore why is the,City not taking action to insure the safety of the
children and the residents on Washington Street. She cited a recent incident that
she experienced with racing cars and asked that Council address this issue.
Pat Homes, 2657 Regent Road,, Carlsbad, stated that she is the owner of 96
Eleanor which was rented by a church and has been rezoned residential. She
explained that the property has a building on it and she has a possible renter,
however for him to rent the building he will have to pay a fee of $2,000. She
stated that the cost has made it impossible for her to rent her building and she is
paying taxes for commercial property, however she cannot rent it as such. She
asked for Council assistance. Mayor Pape pointed out Community Development
Director Brady and suggested that Ms. Homes discuss this issue with him.
Harold Boutilier, 15245 Washington Avenue, and addressed the problem with
traffic on his street and the danger that is present to their children caused by
speeding cars. He stated that it the duty of Council to address safety issues and his
neighborhood wants to prevent a serious accident. He suggested that the citizens
be allow to assist the Police Department as other cities have done to do traffic
enforcement for their area.
Linda Nanetti, questioned where the City is going to get the money for the recent
lawsuit. She suggested that the Redevelopment Agency and the Council become
separate entities and not part of the City coffers. She suggested that this would
allow the money from the taxpayer to be utilized for the needs of the City and the
misuse of the RDA funds and lawsuits would not affect the General Fund. She
noted that other cities do not have RDA draining their coffers.
PAGE TWENTY -FOUR — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23, 1998
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Watenpaugh addressed the problems on Washington Avenue and
stated that he will contact Mrs. O'Neill to set a neighborhood meeting.
He also addressed Mrs. Zeiler's comments and stated that he will provide
information for Mrs. Zeiler to pursue. He stated that the City is concerned with
future water and water rates, however it is not something that the City cannot
directly control.
He congratulated the City Attorney on her 7t' Anniversary.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
No Comments.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Metze commented on the following:
Addressed the problems on Washington Street and noted that if the City
places a stop sign on Washington Avenue and it is not warranted, then the
City is held liable should there be an accident. He stated that it is
frustrating, however the problem must be addressed in the proper manner to
protect everyone and he will be happy to meet with the residents to work on
this issue.
Councilman Alongi commented on the following:
Stated that money solves a lot of problems and that is why he feels that it is
important how the City spends the money. He stated that he would like to
see the City take $100,000 and hire a police officer to sit on Washington
Avenue to end the problem. He noted that when people start getting tickets
and pay fines, they pay attention. He stated that he would rather see us
spend the money in that manner rather than on 4X4 trucks.
2. Addressed LEAF and cautioned people to have their pets spayed and
neutered. He noted that the amount of animals being turned into the pound
is growing and people need to be responsible.
3. Addressed HOPE and stated that every Saturday at 12:00p.m., there will be
free lunch bags, groceries and clothing at the Grand Avenue Association
Building, 17400 Grand Avenue.
4. Commented on the Community Center and stated that he felt that too much
money was set aside and there is a lot of work that can be done by
PAGE TWENTY -FIVE — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23,1998
volunteers. He stated that the City needs volunteers to paint, remove
carpets off of the walls, someone who can lay and repair carpet. He stressed
that the community needs to come to together and show that they have an
interest in their own city by getting the Community Center open. He noted
that the people that are doing the graffiti could contribute by applying their
art to the walls of the Community Center.
Commented on the purchase of computer equipment at City Hall and
explained that the reason the bid was extended was because the closing date
was set on a Friday, and because City Hall is closed it had to be extended.
He further commented on the honesty of the people on Council and staff
and stated that they make mistakes, however they are not trying to favor
anyone.
6. Commented on a meeting with Senator Haynes and stated his surprise
regarding the discussion on Low Income Housing. He noted that in other
communities the Mayors help to build houses and in this community we tear
them down.
7. Stated that he has a problem with changing Multiple Family Zoning because
everytime the City does that we restrict that type of building. He noted that
the General Plan calls for that zoning and the owner of the property had the
opportunity to appear before Council to address the zoning and it should
remain the same now that the General Plan has been adopted. He explained
that the commercial businesses that are coming to the community provide
minimum wage jobs, however the City does not provide minimum wage
housing. He stated that those people are entitled to quality housing the
same as everyone else.
8. Addressed the use of_the. RDA to purchase homes that have been boarded
up, rehabilitate, and sell them to working families that cannot afford new
homes and generate income for RDA. He explained to Ms. Nanetti that the
RDA is a separate entity and asked that she educate herself in regard to
RDA.
Councilwoman Brinley commented on the following:
Thanked Senator Haynes for spending some time on Saturday with Council.
She noted that he touched upon vehicle tax and a breakdown of the
structure. She stated that she felt that the meeting was very valuable.
2. Addressed Washington Avenue and stated that Council has been interested.
She made note of the amount of tickets that have been given over the last
two weeks and stated that it does have some impact. She stated that this is
an important issue and the children of the community are our concern. She
noted the traffic concern in her neighborhood and stressed her
PAGE TWENTY -SIX — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 239 1998
understanding of their problem.
Asked staff to provide some books to Ms. Nanetti to help her better
understand RDA. She noted that this body of officials have been working
hard to resolve the financial problems of the RDA and hope to completely
resolve all the problems in not too many more years.
4. Congratulate staff and the City Manager on the budget and commented on
what a good job they have done.
Expressed her pleasure with the opening of the Community Center, the
Campground and extra Code Enforcement. She stressed her concern
regarding illegal businesses setting up areas on the weekends and taking
business away from our local merchants.
6. Asked the City Attorney to explain Council's position in regard to lawsuits.
City Attorney Leibold noted the lawsuits that the City is currently working
on and the fact that the majority of them she is currently dealing with are
from eight or more years ago. She explained that the City will be making a
motion for an appeal and she will continue to resolve the problems. She
stated that the paperwork for the lawsuit is public information, however it
will not be discussed.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelley commented on the following:
Concurred with Councilwoman Brinley regarding the good job done on the
budget and noted how easy it is to understand. She explained that Council
was given the opportunity to work with staff and review the budget line by
line and express their opinions and desires. She stated that all areas are
open for discussion and the Council will be glad to meet with the public to
receive their input.
2. Addressed the problem on Washington Avenue and stated that Council is
and will be working on the problem. She stated that Council will be
working with Captain Walsh to see what can be done.
Mayor Pape commented on the following:
Thanked the Board of Realtors, who were painting over graffiti today, for
doing such a good job. He noted that the City has budgeted for a graffiti
program and commented on what a good job everyone has done.
2. Wished everyone a happy 4"' of July.
PAGE - TWENTY -SEVEN — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23,1998
City Attorney Leibold addressed the comments regarding litigation and indicated
that all cities are potential parties in litigation and are perceived as deep pockets,
although many such cases are without merit.
CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision ( a) of Section 54956.9):
Koliber vs. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, et al - Case
#217976
Harvey & Page, et al. vs. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, et
al. - Case #215768.
Williams & Hasson vs. City of Lake Elsinore - Case
#257165 /Williams vs. City of Lake Elsinore -Case #257162.
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED
LITIGATION (Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision ( b ) of
Section 54956.9 (1 Case).
City Attorney Leibold announced the above listed closed session items.
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO CLOSED
SESSION AT 10:15 P.M. FOR DISCUSSION OF THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 10:40 P.M., WITH THE
FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENTS:
With regard to the following litigation,
Koliber vs. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, et al - Case
#217976
Harvey & Page, et al. vs. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, et
al. - Case #215768.
Legal Counsel Leibold provided a Status Report to the City Council and by a vote
of 5 to 0 provided clarification of settlement authority.
With regard to the following litigation,
Williams & Hasson vs. City of Lake Elsinore - Case
4257165 /Williams vs. City of Lake Elsinore - Case #257162.
Legal Counsel Leibold provided a Status Report to the City Council.
PAGE TWENTY -EIGHT — CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 23, 1998
With regard to anticipated litigation, Legal Counsel Leibold reported no action.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY ALONGI, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AT 10:41 P.M.
S; W. PAPr, MAYOR
OF LAKE ELSINORE
ATjFI�;ST:
�J1��
VtCKI KASAD, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE