HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-20-2001 City Council Study SessionMINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2001
~:~~~*~:~~~:***~:~~*:~*~**:~~:~~:~*:~*:~*M~M~~x:~*:~~~*~~~*~~~*~:~~:*+:~*~~~~x
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Schiffner called the Joint Study Session to order at 3:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BRINLEY, BUCKLEY,
KELLEY, HICKMAN
SCHIFFNER
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: METZE, PAPE
Aiso present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager
Best, City Attorney Leiboid, Planning Cornmissioner Barnes, Planning
Commissioner Matthies, Planning Commissioner Polk, Commnnity
Development Director Brady, Administrative Services Director Boone,
Community Services Director Sapp, Chief of Police Walsh,
Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Public Warks Manager
Payne, City Clerk/Human Resources D'uectar Kasad and Deputy City Clerk
Paredes.
1. Citv Council Orientation.(F: yy.~~
Mayor Schiffner had the people present introduce themselves.
City Manager Watenpaugh welcomed the new Councilmembers and
indicated that the purpose of the Study Session was to present a
general overview of the various departments and their function.
PAGE TWO - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
He noted that the:Ciry Attorney would be presenting an overview of
the Brown Act and the Political Reform Act, which specifically
addressed elected officials. He indicated that following the Study
Session he would schedule individual meetings with each of the new
Councilmembers to address any specific questions theymight have.
He indicated that a current Budget, Council Policies, and' a list of
Committees had been provided. He noted the need to reappoint
Committee Members to the various Committees that Council sits.
Councilman Hickman asked if Council appointed all the Committees.
City Manager Watenpaugh clari~ed that the Mayor appointed the
Committee Members and the Council ratified the choices. He
encouraged the new Council to express their interest in speci~c
cammittees to allow the Mayor to consider them far the position.
City Clerk Kasad presented an overview of the Terms and noted that
the Council also served on the Redevelopment Agency for the length
of their term.
Ciry Attomey Leibold explained that the Official Seating would take
place at the next Regular City Council Meeting on November27`".
She explained the Elections Code regarding the Seating of Council
and the right to recount. She explained the process should the vote be
overturned from a recount.
City Clerk Kasad explained the seating procedure and the selection of
officers.
Councilman Hickman asked for clarification regarding the seating of
CounciL City Manager Watenpaugh presented an overview of the
selection of Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Chair of the Redevelopment
Agency, Vice Chair of the Redevelopment'Agency, Chair of the
Public Finance Authority and Vice Chair of the Pubic Finance
Authority. He noted that City Cierk Kasad presided the selection.
PAGE TFIREE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER B0, 2001
Ciry Manager Watenpaugh explained that there would not be a Study
Session or Closed Session on November 27~'. He explained that the
purpose of the Meeting on the 27~' was to acknowledge the outgoing
Council and to acknowledge and seat the new Councilmembers. He
indicated that the new Council would consider a small agenda and the
Council Meetings wauld be followed by a sma11 reception. He noted
that that there would be no Agenda Review or Closed Session and the
Regular City Council Meeting wouid begin at 7:00 p.m.
City Manager Watenpaugh explained that the term of the City
Treasurer was four years. He noted that the Planning Cammission
served a term of four years and was appointed by the Mayor and
rati~ed by Council.
Ciry Clerk Kasad explained that similar to Council the Planning
Commission was an alternate 3-seat appointment and 2-seat
appointment, with Commissioners Wilsey and Polk's term to expire in
June.
City Manager Watenpaugh presented an overview of the Committees
as follows:
Califomia Joint Powers Authority
Habitat Conservation Agency
Chamber of Commerce - EDC
Riverside Transit Agency
Southwest Economic Development Corp.
Western Riverside Council of Governments
Santa Ana Water Project Authority (LESJWA)
Crime Free Multi-Housing Project
Satisfy 2020 Committee
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that the City of Lake Elsinore was a
CounciUManager Form of Government and noted that the Council
was the policy maker and the City Manager and staff implemented
PAGE FOUR - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
the policy. He indicated that the City Manager, City Attorney and
City Clerk worked at the pleasure of Councii and the rest of staff
worked for the City Manager. He noted that it would be helpful to
make appointments to allow staff to best address Council needs.
City Attorney Leibold stated that she was a~ailable to Council and
noted the hours that she is at City Ha11. She presented an overview of
the request system.
Mayor Schiffner explained that all direction given to the City
Manager was directed to the appropriate staff inember and he felt that
a11 orders to staff should come from the City Manager.
Councilman Hickman clarified that any Counciimember could call
and not one designated member of Council. City Attorney Leibold
e~lained that she was a~ailable to communicate with any
Councilmember, however she could only take direction from a
majority of Council. She indicated that she was a~ailable to answer
questions, provide information or clarification.
Commissioner Poik clarified that City Council set policy and
administration carries it out. Staff agreed.
City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that he had provided current
budgets and presented an overview of the Goals of the City, revenues,
implemented programs, and grants. He explained some of the
ongoing programs and noted that the concessionaire for the program
would be brought before Council at the December 11~ Meeting. He
further indicated that the City was looking at additional revenue
sources and would be coming back to Council with an analysis of the
Park and Recreation Assessment District and the Traffic Uniform
Mitigation Fees, which would offset Capital Improvements for
infrastructure.
PAGE FIVE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
Councilwoman Kelley asked when the Traf~c Uniform Mitigation
Fee would be brought befare CounciL Community Development
Director Brady stated that he would ha~e the proposal available in
January.
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that staff has been shutting off lights
to conserve energy and it had an impact on energy cost.
He presented an overview of ongoing projects and stated that all the
projects would be discussed at mid-year review of the budget. He
stated that staff was looking at ways to conserve money since it
appeared that the State would be looking to correct their budget
deficit He noted that the State took $150,000 of the City's
transportation funds and because of the current deficit they are
considering city's portion of the Vehicle License Fee, which amounts
to $1.1 million in revenue to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley asked
when the City would hear about the State's decision. City Manager
Watenpaugh stated that it was not known at that rime. Mayor Pro
Tem Brinley asked if staff was working on a back-up plan. Ciry
Manager Watenpaugh stated that it would be addressed at Mid Year
Budget Review.
City Manager Watenpaugh presented an overview of the material
distributed that explains the duties of each departrnent and an
organizational chart. He noted that the City Manager's Office
provided Council with a Weekly Information Memo to provide an
overview of the activity ongoing in the City. He stated that the City
provided each Councilmember with a cell phone, f~ machine and the
ability to set office hours and shared office space.
City Manager explained the benefits that Council received. He
indicated that Council received a monthly stipend of $300 for Council
Meetings set by population; $30 per meeting for Redevelopment
Agency limited to two meetings; Medical, Dental and Vision coverage
PAGE 5IX - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
are offered; a credit cazd is provided for City business and Council is
obligated to turn the receipts into the City Clerk; business cards are
provided; as weil as a ceremonial badge which is for identification
purposes only. City Attorney Leibold cautioned Council in regard to
the misuse of a City Council badge.
City Attorney Leibold indicated that Council needed to consider who
would be attending the League of California Cities in Sacramento and
a voting delegate would have to be selected. Councilwoman Kelley
stated that it was Mayor Schiffner and Mayor Pro Tem Brinley.
Mayor Schiffner stated that he would not be able to attend, therefore
Mayor Pro Tem Brinley would have to be the voting delegate. He
noted that originally the League was scheduled for September 12 and
due to the incident of September 11 the Meeting was changed and he
could to attend.
Mayor Pro Tem Brinley encouraged the new Councilmembers to
attend the League of California Cities Conference for the learning
e~erience and the ability to network. She noted the issues that were
currently facing cities in California and felt that it was very important
to be informed of what was going on at the State level. She noted that
our own City Attorney has done presentations at the League of
California Cities regarding Redevelopment Agency Law. Ciry
Manager Watenpaugh noted that the Planning Commission was
encouraged to attend to bond with their Council andbe involved in the
exchange of ideas. :
City Manager Watenpaugh presented an overview of the City Council
Policies. He encouraged Council to make a review of the policies and
noted that some of the policies would be brought before Councii at the
next City Council Meeting. He noted that the policies that would be
brought before Council for adoption would address the following:
City Credit Cards
Travel & Training
Business Cards & Stationery
PAGE SEVEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, Z001
Use of City Personnel
Internet, Electronic Mail & Software Policy
City Attorney Leibold stated that she would be providing an overview
of the Brown Act and the Political Reforxn Act. She explained that
the Brown Act was also known as the Open Meeting Laws and its
primary purpose was to insure that the all decisions made by a public
agency wouid be made in pubic. She noted that there were four kinds
of ineetings as follows:
Regularly Scheduled Meeting -'72 hour notice
(set by Resolution and must be changed by Resolution)
Special Meetings - 24 hour notice
Adjourned Meetings -(either Speciai or Regular) set for a
specific time and place within 5 days of the Meeting adjourned
from.
Emergency Meetings - No notice, however can only be held
under very speciai circumstances.
She indicated that any elected body or appointed body or committee
must follow the Brown Act and must hear only Agendized items. The
only exception to hearing an item that does not appear on the Agenda,
would be an item that arose after the Agenda was printed and posted
and was business that must be addressed. She noted that it required a
4/5~` vote to add an agenda item. She noted that the act did not govern
individual contacts between Planning Commissioners or
Councilmembers, however it does govern a series of individual
meetings or calls to reach some sort of concurrence. She noted that
the only time the body of Councii can gather without public disclosure
would be at Closed Sessions, Social Events and Conferences. She
explained that all other Meetings must ha~e action taken in public.
PAGE EIGHT - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20; 2001
Mayor Schiffner asked the City Attorney to clarify Serial Meetings.
City Attorney Leibold presented different circutnstances. She stressed
that it would be one person calling another to obtain concurrence from
one person to the nea~t.
City Attorney Leibold explained that the Political Reform Act applies
to a11 public officials. She noted the information distributed to
Council and stated that the "How Conflict of Interest Rules Affect
You", provided by the City Clerk, can answer many questions
regarding a Conflict of Interest. She defined the following topics:
The definition of a Conflict of Interest
Identifying a Public Official
Decide if the Conflict involves a Governmental Decision
By voting or making a appointment
By giving advise or making a recommendation
Communication with the decision-maker
Ascertaining Economic Interests
Business Investments
Business Employment or Management
Rea1 Property
Sources of Income
Gifts
Personal Financial Effect
If the Official is directly or Indirectly Involved
Materiality (kind of impact on economic interest)
Questioning if a Conflict of Interest would result
PAGE NINE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, Z001
If the Public Generally Exception applies
The legally required Participation
City Attorney Leibold concluded by reminding Council to icnow the
purpose of the law; learn to spot potential trouble early; understand
the "big picture"; realize the importance of the facts; don't try to
memorize a lot of rules; and don't be afraid to ask for advise.
There was general discussion regarding the enforcement abilities of
the Fair Political Practices Commission. City Attorney Leibold noted
that the FPPC did not ha~e the ability to remove an of~cial from
of~ce or toplace an official in jail; however they do ha~e the ability
to levy fines and they do publish names and actions in their magazine,
which could create public embarrassment.
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that Senior Code Enforcement
Officer Carol Gordon was also the Union Representative.
Ron LaPere asked if tt~ere was a policy or procedure for committees
appointed by the Mayor. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that there
were no policies or procedures since it was addressed on a case-by-
case basis. He explained that the Subject matter had to be identified
and a goal set for the Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley stated that
it was at Mayor's discretion to deternune if it would be better to sit a
committee or to hold a Town Ha11 Meeting.
Mayor Schiffner asked if he could communicate with the new
Councilmember regarding upcoming issues without violating the
Brown Act. City Attorney Leibold explained that ance the election
was certified, the top vote getters aze Council Elect and as such are
public officials.
PAGE NINE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
ff the Public Generally Exception applies
The legally required Participation
City Attomey Leibold concluded by reminding Council to know the
purpose of the law; learn to spot potential trouble eatly; understand
the "big picture"; realize the importance of the facts; don't try to
memorize a lot of rules; and don't be afraid to ask for advise.
There was general discussion regarding the enforcement abilities of
the Fair Political Practices Commission. City Attomey Leibold noted
that the FPPC did not have the ability to remove an official from
office or to place an official in jail; however they do ha~e the ability
to levy fines and they do publish names and actions in their magazine,
which could create public embarrassment.
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that Senior Code Enforcement
Officer Carol Gordon was also the Union Representative.
Ron LaPere asked if there was a policy or pxocedure for committees
appoinYed by the Mayor. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that there
were no policies or procedures since it was addressed on a case-by-
case basis. He explained that the Subject matter had to be idenrified
and a goal set for the Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley stated that
it was at Mayor's discretion to determine if it would be better to sit a
committee or to hold a Town Hall Meeting.
Mayor Schiffner asked if he could communicate with the new
Councilmember regarding upcoming issues without violating the
Brown Act: City Attorney Leibold explained that once the election
was certified, the top vote getters are Council Elect and as such are
public officials.
PAGE TEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
Ciry Manager Watenpaugh stated that he would be providing phone
numbers of staff for City business. He explained the purpose of Study
Sessions and Joint Study Sessions. City Attorney Leibold explained
noted that the Brown Act did apply and a Study Session was still a
meeting and must be noticed. She further explained that the items on
the Agenda were the only items that could be discussed:
Mayor Schiffner cautioned Council that the BrownAct is important
and there were people in the communiry that accused Council of being
in violation of the Brown Act. He stated that it was incumbent upon
Council to make sure that the accusations were not valid.
Planning Comrnissioner Polk suggested a workshop once or twice a
year to review the future plans of the City and view of the future that
Council has. He noted that it would a11ow Council and Plauning
Commission to address issues that the City was facing.
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that there should be joint meetings
between the Planning Commission and Council regarding the General
Plan Amendment.
Planning Commissioner Polk stated that it would help to have a past
history of major projects to better decide what should occur in future
plamiing. He indicated that it would help to have the big picture of
each major project.
Mayor Schiffner noted that he would like to see more meetings
between the Planning Commission and the City Council.
ADJOiJRNMENT
THE STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOiJRNED AT 4:45 P.M:
PAGE TEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001°
City Manager Watenpaugh staied thathe would be providing phone
numbers of staff for City business. He expiained the purpose of Study
Sessions and Joint Study Sessions. City Attorney Leiboid explained
noted that the Brown Act did apply and a Study Session was still a
meeting and must be noticed. She further explained that the items on
the Agenda were the only items that could be discussed:
Mayor Schiffner cautioned Council that the Brown Act is important
and there were people in the community that accused Council of being
in violation of the Brown Act. He stated that it was incumbent upon
Council to make sure that the accusations were not valid.
Planning Commissioner Poik suggested a workshop once ar twice a
year to review the future plans of the City and view of the future that
Council has. He noted that it would allow Gouncil and Planning
Commission to address issues that the Ciry was facing.
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that there should be joint meetmgs
between the Planning Commission and Council regarding the General
Plan Amendment.
Planning Commissioner Polk stated that it would help to have a past
history of major projects to better decide what should occur in future
planning. He indicated that it would help to have the big picture of
each major project.
Mayor Schiffner noted that he would like to see more meetings
between the Planning Commission and the City Council.
ADJOURNMENT
TAE STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:45 P.M.
PAGE ELEVEN -STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 20, 2001
ROBERT L.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~=c~~t/ ~
Ad 'a L. Paredes, Deputy (~ity Cler~
ATTEST:
v~
VICKI KASAD, C C, CITY CLERK/
HiJMAN RESOURCES DIIZECTOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
YOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE