Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-27-2002 City Council MinutesMINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2002 CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Kelley at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BRINLEY, BUCKLEY, HICKMAN, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY L►M0 �J Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold , Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Police Chief Walsh, Engineering Manager O'Donnell, Information /Communications Manager Dennis and City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilwoman Brinley INVOCATION The Invocation was provided by Pastor Fred Rodriguez, representing Elsinore First Assembly Church. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation - Recognition of Congressman Ken Calvert. (F:168.1) Mayor Kelley recognized Congressman Ken Calvert and noted that he would no longer be serving the City due to redistricting which changed the boundaries. She read and presented the Proclamation and Tile Plaque to Congressman Calvert and noted other projects on which he provided assistance including the Riverside Drive Improvements, Gunnerson Pond, funding to assist local businesses and support for LESJWA. She commented that she was sorry to see him move on, and expressed appreciation for this service to the Community. She noted that Congressman Calvert had served the community for ten years. Congressman Calvert indicated that it did not seem like ten years since he was elected to serve the Southwest Riverside County Area. He reiterated that the District boundaries had been changed, so his District would include a portion of South Orange County. He indicated that it had been a privilege and an honor to be a participant in Lake Elsinore, and noted that the current and prior Councils had made his job easier. He commented that Lake Elsinore would now have two members of Congress working for its future, and indicated that the Community could count on he and Congressman Issa to jointly work to address the issues in both Districts. He thanked the City Council for this recognition. B. Presentation - Recognition of Sheriff Larry Smith. (F:127.2) Mayor Kelley recognized Sheriff Larry Smith and noted that he was retiring. She indicated that she was sorry to see him go, noting his many years of service to Lake Elsinore. She read and presented him with the Proclamation and a City Tile Plaque and congratulated him on his retirement. Sheriff Smith indicated that he was honored to have spent 36 years with the Department, and noted that Lake Elsinore would always have a special place in his heart. He commented that he was proud of his time in PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 the community, and impressed with the staff of the Lake Elsinore station. He thanked the Council for this honor, noting that the Plaque would have special place in his home. C. Introduction of Congressman Darrell Issa. (F:168.1) Mayor Kelley introduced incoming Congressman Darrell Issa, and noted the expectations will be high following service by Congressman Calvert. She presented him with a City pin and welcomed him to the Community. Congressman Issa offered to return to the Cultural Center in January when his term began in the District. He personally thanked Congressman Calvert for his service and noted the unusual nature of the land swap between Districts. He indicated that he was enjoying getting to know the area better, but noted his previous involvement in the LEAPS project. He noted that both Congressmen lost population, but gained area. D. Presentation - Business of the Quarter, Spring, 2002. (17:56.1)(X:70.1) Mayor Kelley recognized Steve & Vicki Wallace and Totally Wired/Totally Themed, as the Spring, 2002 Business of the Quarter. She noted that the Wallace's were personal friends of hers and it was wonderful to see them receive this recognition. She presented them with the Business of the Quarter plaque and detailed their accomplishments in the community. She indicated that they were active supporters of the Lake Elsinore Unified School District, Temescal Canyon High School's Grad Night Program, and the State Grad Night Committee. She noted that Steve Wallace was recently honored by the Riverside County Office of Education for his work on Grad Night Programs. She also noted that they were participants in the Community Action Planning Conference and the Fix it Together Committee, and were active members of the Rotary Club and Chamber of Commerce. She advised that they were part of the City's pilot program for Economic Gardening. She indicated that their business created themed environments for residences and businesses and they were pursuing another PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 business endeavor. Mr. Wallace expressed his support for the City and area charities; and indicated that he felt that businesses were obligated to do so. He encouraged other businesses to provide support to charities aiding Senior Citizens and Children, noting the fulfillment gained from such activities. E. Proclamation - Elsinore First Assembly of God Church - 9/11 Commemoration. (F:122.1) Mayor Kelley read and presented the Proclamation to Pastor Fred Rodriguez, and noted the upcoming commemoration of September 11'. Pastor Rodriguez expressed appreciation for this recognition and detailed the Memorial Service which would include Speaker Scott O'Grady, a fly- over with the Missing Man Formation, the Marine Corp. Honor Guard, a 21 gun salute, etc. He invited everyone to attend and noted the participation by local legislators. He indicated that the Proclamation would have a prominent viewing place in his church and thanked the Council for this recognition. F. Proclamation - Three Lakes Posse Rodeo. (F: 151.1)(X:122.1) Mayor Kelley read and presented the Proclamation to Posse representatives Dan Uhlry and Tom Hundshamer. She noted her participation on Sunday Night and encouraged attendance by the Community. Dan Uhlry indicated that it was a pleasure to accept this proclamation on behalf of Sheriff Smith and the Sheriffs Department, and noted Sheriff Smith's assistance in getting the Rodeo started. He noted that the event would benefit the entire County and its Posse team. He thanked the Council for this recognition and invited everyone to attend. Tom Hundshamer noted the Rodeo schedule for August 30 - September 1, with the Rodeo starting at 7:30 p.m., followed by a dance each night. PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 G. Presentation - Cops for Kids. (F:127.2) Tammy Walsh thanked the Council for this opportunity to speak and noted that Steve & Vicki Wallace were big supporters of the Cops for Kids Program, and were theming their event for September 6". She advised that the annual Fundraising event would be held on September 6', and thanked the City Council and Community for their annual support. She expressed appreciation for Sheriff Smith's support of the program and indicated that he would be greatly missed. She stressed that they were an all volunteer organization with no paid staff. She indicated that the fund raiser tickets were nearly sold out, and there would be no ticket sales at the door. She indicated that tickets were available from Chief Walsh, the Sheriffs Station or the Chamber of Commerce. She advised that this year's event would be a luau and they had hired a Polynesian entertainment group for the event. She detailed the schedule for the event, which will run from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. and stressed the need to buy tickets in advance. She presented a video detailing last year's efforts and noted that they had become a year round service. She advised that the Videotape or C.D.'s were available as a marketing tool, and encouraged everyone to get involved. Mayor Kelley thanked the Congressmen and Sheriff Smith for their attendance at this meeting, wished them all well, and suggested a recess to allow for their departure from the meeting. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED T 7:40 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 7:47 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BUCKLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. The following Minutes were approved: (F:44.4) a. City Council /Redevelopment Agency Study Session - August 13, 2002. b. Regular City Council Meeting - August 13, 2002. C. Special City Council Meeting - August 15, 2002. 2. Ratified Warrant List for August 15, 2002. (F:12.3) Adopted Resolution No. 2002 -48, Approving Mid -Block Crosswalk for Graham Avenue at the Out Flow Channel. (F:162.2) RESOLUTION NO. 2002-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ESTABLISHING A MID -BLOCK CROSSWALK. 4. Authorized the City Manager to execute a Municipal Lease Agreement and Maintenance Agreement with Temecula Copiers /Citicapital Corp. for a term of 60 months for the Lease of a New Office Copier. (F:68.1)(X:50.1) 5. Standardized on the Dell Computer Optiplex product line and accept bid number two from Dell Computers for the replacement of ten personal computers, and authorized the City Manager to execute a purchase order. (F:68.1)(X:65.1) 6. Approved Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Agreement and implementation plan and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement. PAGE SEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING 21. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30395 - The Cornerstone Group - Pasadena Street, Between Central Avenue & Third Street. (F:110.2) Community Development Director Brady explained this item and noted that there was another tentative map, a design review and a negative declaration related to this map. He advised that this approval was for an industrial map consisting of 9.7 acres, being divided into six parcels ranging from 4.4 acres to just under 1/2 acre. He indicated that this was a project by Near Cal and noted the displayed parcel maps. He detailed the recommendation for Council's consideration. Mayor Kelley opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m., asking those persons interested in this project to speak. The following person spoke: Dwight Johnson, representing Near Cal, requested approval of this map. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed at 7:51 p.m. Councilman Hickman expressed support for this item. Councilman Buckley indicated that this was a nice project. Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner concurred, noting that Near Cal does a very good job in the City and he was proud to have them in the Community. Councilwoman Brinley concurred that Near Cal works well with the City and provides top notch projects. She commented that it was nice to see the industrial base growing and increasing the job availability. Mayor Kelley indicated that she had no problems with the proposal, and noted that it would be a nice addition. PAGE EIGHT - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BUCKLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30395 BASED ON EXHIBITS A THRU C AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 30395 PLANNING DIVISION 1. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30395 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30395 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 3. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning TPM No. 30395, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 4. Prior to final map approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 30395, the improvements specified herein and recommended approved by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 5. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 6. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 7. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 8. Pay all applicable park fees in force at time of issuance of building permits. PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 9. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision prior to building permit. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 10. Meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 11. Meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 12. Meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 13. All trailers, mailboxes and signage used during construction shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 14. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval pursuant to Section 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 15. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, sub - divider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 16. Prior to building permit the applicant shall submit a Sign Program for the entire complex. This Program shall include size, location and color restricts for each building. The program shall include size, location and color for any monuments signs. 17. The applicant shall record a CC &R that provides for irrevocable reciprocal parking, circulation, ingress and egress, loading and landscaping maintenance easements in favor of all lots. It shall also enforce standards of building maintenance and participation in landscape maintenance. The CC &R shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to building permit. PAGE ELEVEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 18. Prior to building permits and/or street improvements the applicant of TPM 30395 shall coordinate with the applicant of Conditional Use Permit No. 2001 -02 to comply with all the Conditions of Approval of the Conditional Use Permit including the requirement for a 6 foot block wall along Pasadena Street and chain link fence with wood slats on the sides and rear property lines. ENGINEERING DIVISION 19. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 20. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). The traffic mitigation fee will be $0.71 per sq. foot of industrial building area and the drainage fee will be $6,330 per acre for a total fee of $60,958. 21. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 22. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 23. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 24. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 final map approval. 25. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 26. Street A will require 10 ft. of additional paving beyond the center line of the street. 27. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '' /z" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 28. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 29. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 30. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 31. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 32. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 33. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 34. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and /or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or developer to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 35. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 36. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 37. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 38. An Alquis - Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on -site. 39. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 40. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions ". 41. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 42. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 43. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 44. No structures can be built in the floodway. For structures built in the flood plain, the finish floor elevation must be at or above the base flood elevation. 45. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies. 46. The floodway and floodplain must be designated on the final map. 47. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 48. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 49. All drainage structures outletting into the Outlet Channel must receive approval from the Riverside County Flood Control District. 50. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 51. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 52. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right -of -way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 53. Developer shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees and will receive credit for all Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed. 54. Provide Phasing Plan for the site and Pasadena Ave. for the City Engineer's approval. 55. Applicant shall cause to be recorded a CC &R which provides for irrevocable reciprocal parking, circulation, loading and landscape maintenance easement in favor of all lots subject to the approval of the director of Community Development & the City Attorney. The CC& R shall enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 56. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 57. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 58. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 59. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR &R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 22. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 & Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2002 -03 - The Cornerstone Group - Pasadena Street/Central Avenue. (F:110.2) Community Development Director Brady indicated that this map was adjacent to the prior one, with the same applicant. He advised that it would divide 6.6 acres into 12 parcels ranging from 16,975 to 29,609 square feet. He noted that the Design Review item (no. 31 of this agenda) would also address this project. He detailed the recommendations for Council consideration. Mayor Kelley opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m., asking those persons interested in this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. Councilman Buckley indicated that this was another good project and he had no problems with it. Councilman Hickman expressed support for the project and the builder. Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner indicated that his comments were the same as for the last project. PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Councilwoman Brinley indicated that she had no problem with this item and enjoyed working with the developer. Mayor Kelley had no comments. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30181 AND CERTIFY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2002-03 BASED ON EXHIBITS A THRU C. AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FINDINGS Negative Declaration No. 2002 -03 Negative Declaration No. 2002 -03 has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's CEQA requirements. The report is complete and adequate in its evaluation of all environmental effects of the Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 and associated discretionary approvals. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 and associated discretionary approvals will not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts. 2. The proposed applications will not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. Given that project impacts are insignificant cumulative impacts are not foreseen. The proposed applications do not have the potential to adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly. PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Tentative Parcel Map 30181 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning TPM No. 30181, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 4. Prior to final map approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181, the improvements specified herein and recommended approved by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 5. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 6. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 7. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 8. Pay all applicable park fees in force at time of issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision prior to building permit. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 10. Meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 11. Meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 12. Meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 13. All trailers, mailboxes and signage used during construction shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 14. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval pursuant to Section 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 15. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, sub - divider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 16. Prior to building permit the applicant shall submit a Sign Program for the entire complex. This Program shall include size, location and color restricts for each building. The program shall include size, location and color for any monuments signs. 17. The applicant shall record a CC &R that provides for irrevocable reciprocal circulation, ingress and egress, loading and landscaping maintenance easements in favor of all lots. It shall also enforce standards of building maintenance and participation in landscape maintenance. The CC &R shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to building permit. ENGINEERING DIVISION 18. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 19. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). The traffic mitigation fee will be $0.71 per sq. foot of building area and the drainage fee will be $4,660 per acre for a total fee of $30,756. PAGE TWENTY -ONE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 20. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 21. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 22. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 23. "A" Street will require 10 ft. of additional paving beyond the centerline of the street. 24. Driveway access to Pasadena Ave. from lots fronting Pasadena Ave. shall be restricted. 25. Riverside County Fire Department must approve easement widths and turning radii within the site prior to final map approval. 26. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 27. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 28. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 'h" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements PAGE TWENTY -TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 will be scheduled and approved. 29. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 30. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 31. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 32. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 33. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 34. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 35. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or developer to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 36. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. PAGE TWENTY -THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 37. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 38. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 39. An Alquis - Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on -site. 40. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 41. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions ". 42. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 43. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 44. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. PAGE TWENTY -FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 45. No structures can be built in the floodway. For structures built in the flood plain, the finish floor elevation must be at or above the base flood elevation. 46. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies. 47. The floodway and floodplain must be designated on the final map. 48. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 49. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 50. All drainage structures outletting into the Outlet Channel must receive approval from the Riverside County Flood Control District. 51. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 52. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 53. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right -of -way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 54. Developer shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees and will receive credit for all Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed. PAGE TWENTY -FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 55. Provide Phasing Plan for the site and Pasadena Ave. for the City Engineer's approval. 56. Applicant shall cause to be recorded a CC &R which provides for irrevocable reciprocal pig, circulation, loading and landscape maintenance easement in favor of all lots subject to the approval of the director of Community Development & the City Attorney. The CC& R shall enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 57. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented with the development including maintenance responsibilities. Parking lot and roof runoff must go through a filtering system before draining to the public maintained storm drain. 58. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 59. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 60. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR &R Inc. for PAGE TWENTY -SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 23. Tentative Parcel Map No 30680 - Alesco Development LLC. (17:110.2) Community Development Director Brady advised that this item had been before the Council previously as part of the Vertigo Project. He indicated that as part of the process, the applicant was dividing the property into two parcels, one 2.5 acres, and one 3.5 acres. He further indicated that the project was located at the Cereal /Corydon Streets, and public improvements would be required as part of the project. He noted that the applicant was proposing an industrial condominium project for the remaining parcel. City Manager Watenpaugh noted that this was a business which Calvert had assisted with funding. He detailed the recommendations for Council consideration. Mayor Kelley opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m., asking those persons interested in this item to speak. Hearing no one, the public hearing was closed at 7:57 p.m. Councilman Buckley noted that this item had been discussed at length, and he was in support of the project. Mayor Pro Tem Schiffner questioned condition No. 42 regarding the Floodplain, and questioned if arrangements had been made for the necessary materials. Community Development Director Brady indicated that much of it was at the proper elevation, but he was not sure arrangements had been finalized. Councilwoman Brinley inquired if the applicant was satisfied with the conditions. Community Development Director Brady confirmed. Councilwoman Brinley indicated that she had no problem with the project. PAGE TWENTY- SEVEN -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Councilman Hickman noted the location of the proposed project and indicated that it was being removed from the Liberty Specific Plan area for industrial uses. He expressed support for the project. Mayor Kelley indicated that she had no problems with the project. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30680, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, EXHIBIT A AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). 2. The effects this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impacts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30680 PLANNING DIVISION Tentative Parcel Map No. 30680 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. PAGE TWENTY- EIGHT -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30680 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning TPM No. 30680, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and /or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 4. Pay all applicable fees including park fees in force at time of issuance of building permits. 5. Prior to final map approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 30680, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 6. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 7. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). PAGE TWENTY- NINE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision prior to building permit. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 10. Meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 11. Meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 12. Meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 13. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 14. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval pursuant to Section 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 15. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 16. This subdivision shall comply with all applicable Mitigation Measures incorporated within Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002 -01 subject to approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. ENGINEERING DIVISION 17. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) PAGE THIRTY -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 prior to final map approval. 18. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). Drainage fee will not be required for this project. A traffic mitigation fee of $0.71 per square foot of building will be required at building permit. 19. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 20. Dedicate 20' feet along the frontage of Corydon Street and a minimum of half street improvements will be required on Corydon and half street improvements plus a travel lane will be required on Cereal Street. 21. Corydon Street and Cereal Street shall be constructed with 10' foot parkways. 22. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer PRior to final map approval. (LEMC 16.34). 23. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 24. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 25. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to PAGE THIRTY - ONE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 final map approval. 26. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1 /z" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 27. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit. 28. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 29. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 30. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 31. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 32. Developer shall obtain the services of a traffic engineer to determine the traffic impact on the intersection of Corydon and Cereal and determine if a left turn lane and/or right turn deceleration lane may be required for this proj ect. 33. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. PAGE THIRTY - TWO -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 34. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 35. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 36. An Alquis - Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on -site. 37. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 38. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions ". 39. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 40. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 41. Site development along the lake perimeter will require special grading and flood proofing requirements (LEMC 15). PAGE THIRTY -THREE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 42. Structures built in the Lake Floodway must have the finished floor elevation at or above the base flood elevation of 1267 feet. Fill cannot be imported into the lake floodplain but fill may be transported within the lake floodplain. 43. The Corps of Engineers should be contacted to establish if they have any jurisdiction involving this project. A 401 permit may be required for some of this site is below an elevation of 1265 feet. 44. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and if necessary the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to final map approval. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. Drainage improvements must be compatible with the approved Specific Plan's drainage plan. 45. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 46. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 47. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. Inlets in parking lots for storm water drainage will require a filtering system to be installed as part of the inlet. 48. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and PAGE THIRTY -FOUR -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 including maintenance responsibilities. 49. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and vehicle maintenance as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 50. Applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies. 51. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR &R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. BUSINESS ITEMS 31. Design Review for Industrial Project No. I- 2002 -02 - Triple J. Development - Pasadena Street /Central Avenue. (F:86.2) Community Development Director Brady detailed this project, noting that the buildings would be tilt -up concrete, ranging from 4,400 to 8,500 square feet. He indicated that a conditional use permit had been approved by the Planning Commission for outdoor storage, and displayed the renderings provided by the applicant. He noted staff s efforts to work with industrial developers to develop a more unique design. He detailed staffs recommendations for Council consideration. PAGE THIRTY -FIVE- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Councilman Hickman noted that Carl Johnson had arrived at the meeting; and expressed support for the project. Councilwoman Brinley indicated that she had no problem with the proposed proj ect. Councilman Buckley indicated that the buildings looked nice and would fit in well. Mayor Pro Tem Schiffner indicated that he had no problem, and the project looked very nice. Mayor Kelley indicated that she had no problem with the proposed project. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BUCKLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 12002-02 FOR AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONSISTING OF TWELVE (12) INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, INCLUDING OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS, BASED ON EXHIBITS A THRU E AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: FINDINGS The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17. 82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17. 82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into this approval of the subject project to insure development PAGE THIRTY -SIX -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Design Review approval for Industrial Project No. 12002-02 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year of City Council approval. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time of up to one (1) year per extension, prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval. Application for a time extension must be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 2. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 3. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 4. Any revisions to the interior floor plans that could cause the requirement for additional parking shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 5. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from PAGE THIRTY - SEVEN -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 neighboring property or public streets including Collier Avenue. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. 6. All exterior on -site lighting shall be shielded and directed on -site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building. 7. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping and shall meet City Standards for Type `C' loading zones (12' x 55'). 8. Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 9. The applicant shall construct a 6 foot decorative masonry wall along the western boundary and along the southwestern boundary. The exterior surface of the decorative wall shall be coated with an anti - graffiti material. 10. Six foot opaque gates shall be required at the entrance of each outdoor storage area. 11. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director. A 5' landscaped planter is required on each side of the trash enclosure. 12. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 13. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire rating. 14. All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match with building exterior color. 15. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction PAGE THIRTY - EIGHT -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require a $1,000.00 cash bond, submit a site plan and processed through the Planning Division. 16. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 17. Future development of the future phase of development within Tentative Parcel Map No 30181 shall require Community Development Director or designee approval. 18. Future development within Tentative Parcel Map No. 30181 shall utilize the same style of architecture. 19. On -site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. 20. Parking stalls shall be double- striped with four -inch (4 ") lines two feet (2') apart. 21. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Landscape Architectural Consultant and Planning Division. 22. Any roof mounted equipment shall be screened from the pubic right -of -way. Ground mounted electrical equipment shall be screened with landscaping materials. PRIOR TO BUILDING /GRADING PERMITS 23. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant PAGE THIRTY - NINE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 29, 2002 shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 24. A Sign Program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to building permits. 25. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping /Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40 %) City fee. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40) apart and at least twenty- four -inch (24 ") box in size. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six -inch (6 ") high and six -inch (6 ") wide concrete curb. d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress /egress points shall be no higher than thirty -six inches (36 "). e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years. PAGE FORTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign -off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval /acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 26. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. PAGE FORTY - ONE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 28. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. ENGINEERING DIVISION 30. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). 31. Industrial Project 2002 -02 shall comply with all relevant conditions of approval for Parcel Map 30181 that are applicable at the appropriate approval process. 32. Designation of League of California Cities Annual Conference City Delegate, Alternate & Fla Bearer. earer. Mayor Kelley highlighted this item and indicated that it was discussed during the Agenda Review, at which Councilwoman Brinley was not present. Councilman Hickman nominated Councilwoman Brinley for Flag Bearer. Councilman Buckley, Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner and Mayor Kelley concurred. Mayor Kelley commented that it was a wonderful experience to carry the City's flag with the other cities. Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner nominated Councilman Hickman, as the Delegate. Councilman Hickman nominated Mayor Kelley, as the Delegate. Councilwoman Brinley & Councilman Buckley concurred with the nomination of Mayor Kelley. PAGE FORTY -TWO- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Councilman Buckley nominated Councilman Hickman, as the Alternate. Mayor Pro Tem Schiffner, Councilwoman Brinley and Mayor Kelley concurred. MOVED BY BUCKLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPOINT COUNCILWOMAN BRINLEY AS THE FLAG BEARER, MAYOR KELLEY AS THE DELEGATE AND COUNCILMAN HICKMAN AS THE ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN LONG BEACH, CA, OCTOBER 2 - 59 2002. 33. Draft Response to Grand Jury Report. (F:44.1)(X:140.1) City Manager Watenpaugh presented an overview of the response prepared for Council's Consideration. He indicated that the document was a draft and it was up to the City Council to modify or change the document. Councilman Buckley addressed Section No. 4, which reads: "As a point of clarification, the City's Attorneys' fees do not include fees related to the City defense cost for "drowning ". That defense is covered by the City's insurance carrier." He indicated that the paragraph should be deleted since the City Attorney has billed for hours related to the drowning in consultation with the City's insurance carrier. He addressed Item No. 2 Response under Recommendations, which reads: "The financial problem Lake Elsinore has is the result of past irresponsible political decisions, not ongoing administrative or financial mistakes or incompetence ". He noted that there had been past administrative decisions as well as irresponsible political decisions and he felt that the statement should be amended. He addressed Item No. 1 of the Recommendations, paragraph 2 of the Response, and stated that he would like to see language noting that the City was operating with a one million dollar deficit this year and that the Redevelopment Agency has a $15,000,000 unfunded debt. He addressed Item No. 3 of the Response and suggested that verbiage be added to include PAGE FORTY - THREE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 the fact that the City had contracted for a process audit. He stated that he felt it was the intent of the Grand Jury to see a forensic audit with an in- depth process audit. He stated that if the response was approved as it was written, he indicated that he would, as an independent Councilmember, send a separate response. He invited anyone on Council to sign his letter that he would be sending separately. He stated that he would list the letter as an "Unofficial Minority Report" and it would be available to the public after Council received a copy. Councilman Hickman addressed Item No. 6 under findings and stated that he was not comfortable with the response since it was water under the bridge, however he felt that there should be a Study Session to address the Code of Ethics. He suggested that once a person left the City Council or a Management position with the City they should be prohibited from doing business with the City for at least a year. He stated that he agreed with Councilman Buckley's changes. Councilwoman Brinley asked City Attorney Leibold to address Item No. 5 of the Recommendations. City Attorney Leibold stated that the response, in her opinion, accurately stated that the City had sufficient budgeted revenues and reserves to cover anticipated expenditures. She further stated that she had understood deficit spending to mean monies required to be borrowed to cover expenses. She commented that the City was not in that condition. She noted that the Agency did carry loans that had been unfunded on the books, both to the City and to its housing fund. She indicated that those were documented and evidenced by an advanced funding agreement from the City to the Agency and an inter -fund Loan Agreement through one of the bond issues with respect to monies borrowed from the Housing Fund. She restated that her understanding was that deficit spending was when the entity was required to borrow money to cover expenses, and the City was not in that position. Councilwoman Brinley clarified that the Agency had been working diligently toward meeting its 20% set aside. City Attorney Leibold stated that the Agency did have some monies available in its set- PAGE FORTY - FOUR -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 aside account that were approved at the last regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting in connection with Century Builders. She commented that there was a sizable obligation back to the housing fund, but it had been recognized and the Agency looked forward to funding the Housing Fund and doing more affordable housing projects. Councilwoman Brinley commented that according to Supervisor Buster's comments she felt he was disappointed in the findings of the Grand Jury; and further commented that Supervisor Buster knew that the Council and Agency had been working through past financial problems. She addressed the section on Ethics and stated that no one liked to throw stones, however the incident did happen. She noted that all of Council's ethics had been in question, but noted that Closed Sessions were in compliance with the Brown Act. She welcomed a future Study Session regarding policies and the Code of Ethics. She addressed the investigation of the Stadium and noted that the City had responded to a former Grand Jury investigation. She noted that annual independent audits were done every year and had been cleared through the State of California. Mayor Pro Tem Schiffner stated that he found no problems with the responses suggested in the draft. He addressed Councilman Buckley's comment that some of the answers in the response would not satisfy the Grand Jury, and commented that as one of the Council that was interviewed by the Grand Jury and seeing their recommendations, he felt that they did not understand what was going on in the City. He stated that he was not concerned with satisfying them, but rather complying with the law that stated that the City must respond. He noted that the Grand Jury specifically made a comment in regard to the Code of Ethics not being followed. He noted that anything but an answer to that would indicate that the City agreed that the Code of Ethics had not been followed and that was not true. He indicated that there had been one case and that was all there was. He stated that he would be willing to review the Code of Ethics at a Study Session, however the issues that Councilman Hickman raised had nothing to PAGE FORTY -FIVE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 do with the Grand Jury Recommendation. He stated that he was in support of the document, exactly as it is written. Mayor Kelley commented that during her appearance before the Grand Jury she felt that they were specifically looking at the drownings. She noted that she was quizzed on many other subjects, especially past history, of which no one on the current Council would have direct knowledge. She noted that the Stadium was built long before the current Council took office and the existing Council had made every effort to make sure that the City benefits from the Stadium; the Stadium had already been investigated by the Grand Jury and there was no negative report from that investigation. She addressed the finding regarding the City Campground and noted that in an effort to reduce the debt on the Stadium, the City and the Agency did refinance from 9.5% down to 1.6% interest on the Lake recreation area and created a huge savings. She addressed the legal fees and indicated that they had been very high and noted the items that had been addressed. She noted that the items being litigated were created long before the existing Council took office. She stated that the City had excellent legal representation and that representation was necessary to battle the City's way out of some of the problems that occurred in the past. Mayor Kelley addressed the Code of Ethics and stated that the comment was not specific and to her knowledge there was only one incident where the Code of Ethics was violated. She noted that some policies were being ignored by some of the current Councilmembers, however it was not an ethical violation. She noted that what should have been in the response was the comment Supervisor Buster made that said, "the City did not qualify for a Municipal Response Team ". She stressed that she took offense at the Grand Jury's comment regarding the Code of Ethics. She stated that she was satisfied with the staff s response. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 2 WITH BUCKLEY AND HICKMAN CASTING THE PAGE FORTY - SIX -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 DISSENTING VOTES TO APPROVE THE RESPONSE LETTER TO THE GRAND JURY. City Manager Watenpaugh asked if the Motion was to approve the Response Letter as it was written. Mayor Kelley confirmed that it was "as is City Manager Watenpaugh expressed his agreement with the comment by Councilman Hickman regarding "water under the bridge "; and stated that he would make that comment to any number of items in the Grand Jury Report. He noted that many of the items had been addressed several times and he did not know how to prevent that occurrence, since the items kept coming back. He commented on the Process Audit and stated that it would not address the finances of the City, but rather how staff communicated information. He stressed that the Process Audit would not address budget and funding. He indicated that Hayhurst and Associates would look at how the City was organized and how City staff communicated. City Attorney Leibold stated that there was consideration given as whether to include reference in this report to the recently commissioned Process Audit and concluded that it was not focused on finances. She stated that it did not hurt to add to the response that it was something that the City was doing. Councilwoman Brinley stated that she thought that the Study was going to look at the salaries of the employees. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that the Parity Study would address salaries and benefits of the employees, however it would not be addressed in the budget until the study was done to consider if the budget could address those changes. He explained that the Parity Study would look at salaries, benefits and present comparisons for Council consideration. Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner clarified that a Process Audit addressed performance. City Manager Watenpaugh explained that a Process Audit was a management audit that looked at how issues were dealt with and the process of handling work. City Attorney Leibold stated that it would not hurt to reference the L.B. Hayhurst contract to the extent that it PAGE FORTY -SEVEN -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 demonstrated the City's willingness to evaluate process and look at its procedures, as well as the Parity Study. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE AT THE END OF RECOMMENDATION NO. 39 THE VERBIAGE "IN ADDITION, THE CITY RECENTLY ENTERED INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HAYHURST AND ASSOCIATES TO CONDUCT A PROCESS AUDIT AND PARITY STUDY" Mayor Pro Tem Schiffner indicated that he wished to make it clear that the City did not enter into the contract for a Process Study and Parity Study in response to the Grand Jury, but rather in response to concerns of some of the Council. City Manager Watenpaugh stated that the Attorney's point was the Council was willing to take a look internally as to whether the City was doing things right or doing them wrong. He indicated that it focused on the point that Council was willing to look at things and make changes if the process was not proper. City Attorney Leibold addressed Councilman Buckley's identification of the accuracy and response to Item No. 4 last paragraph of the findings "As a point of clarification, the City's attorneys' fees do not include fees related to the City defense cost for "drownings." She stated that for total accuracy she would address the 4 or 5 hours of phone charges that were regarding the drownings. Councilwoman Brinley asked if City Attorney Leibold knew the amount of the fees, off the top of her head. City Attorney Leibold stated that she did not, however she indicated that she would include the amount or at least make reference to the fact that the greater cost of the expense was covered through the SCJPIA. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 2 WITH BUCKLEY AND HICKMAN CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTES TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE AT THE PAGE FORTY - EIGHT -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 27, 2002 END OF RECOMMENDATION NO. 3, THE VERBIAGE "IN ADDITION, THE CITY RECENTLY ENTERED INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L.B. HAYHURST AND ASSOCIATES TO CONDUCT A PROCESS AUDIT AND PARITY STUDY", AND THE CITY ATTORNEY WAS AUTHORIZED TO CLARIFY CITY'S ATTORNEYS' FEES IN THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF FINDING NO. 4. City Attorney Leibold noted that she had a conversation with Councilman Buckley regarding the Grand Jury Response, which he mentioned in his comments. She stated that there was only one official response from the City to the Grand Jury. She indicated that Councilman Buckley had stated that he might prepare his own individual comments and forward them to the Grand Jury. She further noted that, as such, she would anticipate that such a response would say something to the effect that "I am an elected Councilmember in the City of Lake Elsinore; I participated in the discussion; and I voted against the official response for the following reasons ". She stated that any of Council could enjoy their first amendment rights and could contact the Grand Jury in an individual capacity, however the response, although referencing the position as a Councilmember, should be on personal stationary and identified as "not an official response ". THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:35 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:40 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS Mayor Kelley noted the new podium for Public Comments. Pete Dawson, 18010 Grand Avenue, expressed thanks for the quick response to the recent fish kill. He commented that the problem was solved "for now ", but opens the possibility of another episode with low oxygen levels and high nutrient PAGE FORTY - NINE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 levels. He further commented that there was another problem, being the media coverage of the fish kills, which would impact the Labor Day Holiday weekend. He stressed the need for some public relations work to get the word out that the fish kill was over. He further stressed the magnitude of this holiday weekend for the businesses and the community. He suggested that the Council should recommend that a Councilperson with a media background respond with a positive press release. Carl Gayley, resident of Escondido, noted that he was the project manager for a renovation project on the Shore Acres Resort on Grand Avenue. He indicated that the project was being funded by his family investment group, which was a group of dairy farmers. He indicated that he was looking forward to working with the community and solicited support for their efforts. Bill Tucker, 740 Acacia, noted the fish kill last week, but stressed the City's quick action to solve the problem. He commented that the fish were mostly carp and last year's hatch of catfish, as well as a couple of huge bass. He announced a Kids Fishing Contest on October 2 d, which he was just starting to promote. He noted that he was trying to acquire different fish, which would be easier for the kids to catch, such as Tilapia, or highbred Bluegill. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Watenpaugh commented on the following: 1) Thanked Mr. Dawson for his letter. 2) Expressed appreciation to Congressmen Calvert and Issa for coming to the City. 3) Noted that Sheriff Smith would be missed in his retirement, and commented that Chief Walsh would be doing the same soon. PAGE FIFTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 4) Announced a Study Session for the explanation of the LLMD and CR & R's contract, to be held on September 19' at 4 p.m. at City Hall. He indicated that he would make arrangements for a Study Session on the Code of Ethics. 5) Thanked the Council for dealing with tough issues in a positive way. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS No Comments. COMMITTEE REPORTS No Reports. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Buckley commented on the following: 1) Encouraged attendance at the Rodeo over the Labor Day Weekend, and noted the availability of additional information on the website. 2) Thanked staff and the convicts for doing a good job on the fish kill, very quickly. 3) Expressed support for the use of reclaimed water to keep the Lake full, and stressed that it did not cause the fish kill, as there were many contributing factors. 4) Indicated that with regard to the media coverage, he had been helping Information/Communications Manager Dennis on this issue. He noted that the Channel 7 coverage could have been worse, but he was willing to do whatever he could to help. He encouraged the public to PAGE FIFTY - ONE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 call radio shows and remind them that there was a fish kill, but it is over, and encourage people to come out and enjoy the Lake. Mayor Pro Tern Schiffner commented on the following: 1) Addressed the Media and the Channel 7 coverage, noting that they interviewed Mark Norton of SAWPA and he gave a nice explanation. He noted that he was also interviewed and stressed that it was not a total disaster, but possibly a blessing in disguise, as it was cheaper than the recent harvesting effort. He noted that fish kills occurred in other lakes as well. 2) Noted that he read a letter from a resident of the County area, who he met and got acquainted with, and indicated that some of his statements were quite inaccurate. He noted that with regard to the lake wells, and the ability to have them on in two days, there were no pumps in the wells, and while work was proceeding to get them in operation, considerable engineering was required. He also commented that power lines were required and the total cost of getting the wells in operation was about $1.3 million. He suggested if the individual wanted information, he could get in touch and obtain an explanation. He expressed concern with inaccurate information being spread around. 3) Expressed appreciation for the presence of the Congressmen and looked forward to their joint representation. Councilwoman Brinley commented on the following: 1) Commended Congressman Calvert on his efforts for the 43`a District, noting that he tried hard to assist the Community and listen to the needs. PAGE FIFTY - TWO -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 2) Commended Sheriff Smith on his work which was responsive to City needs and produced good programs to keep the crime rate low. She indicated that a debt was owed to Captain Walsh and Sheriff Smith. 3) Welcomed Congressman Issa and expressed hopes of building a working relationship with him on water issues, traffic circulation, etc. She noted that he showed a willingness to listen and he wanted to be part of the process. 4) Commended the work of Steve & Vicki Wallace and noted their participation in an educational program for the RTA. She commended them as great community supporters. 5) Concurred with Mr. Dawson that the media loved to beat up on Lake Elsinore, but noted an article in the Californian on August 14`h, regarding the housing boom in Lake Elsinore. She advised that the median home price was in the $230,000 range, and noted that the City issued 577 building permits in the first seven months of the year, which was nearly double the number in 2001. She welcomed the new residents to the community. 6) Commented on the success of local kids, noting that Jason Fife would be starting quarterback for the Oregon State University Ducks. She encouraged Lake Elsinore residents to buy the latest Sports Illustrated to see the write up on him. She stressed that a lot of good things were never mentioned in the press. 7) Wished the Sheriff s Posse a successful Rodeo, and noted its location. 8) Addressed Pastor Rodriguez's efforts in the Community and the 9/11 Memorial event; and encouraged participation in the event. 9) Wished everyone a good and safe Labor Day weekend. PAGE FIFTY -THREE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 Councilman Hickman commented on the following: 1) Noted that the Council had dinner with Congressmen Calvert and Issa, and indicated that it was nice to see the comraderie between the two Congressmen. He commented that they were two Congressmen who would work hard for the Community. 2) Thanked Jerry Harmatz and his brother for their work on the parking lot near the Senior Center/Lakepoint Park. 3) Advised Senior Citizens that they were still doing the tax rebate for property owners and renters over the age of 62; but noted that September 3rd would be the last day for the service. He stressed that the money had already been paid and the people were entitled to it. 4) Noted that the Queen of the Rodeo would be announced on Friday evening; and encouraged attendance for family fun. 5) Gave kudos to Mayor Kelley for her fundraising work for the Concert Series. 6) Announced the EDC Lunch on September 5`h, and advised that seating was limited, with the last day for reservations being September 3rd 7) Noted the Cops for Kids Luau and indicated that he was totally impressed with their work. 8) Noted the Elsinore First Assembly presentation on September 8'h and indicated that he had heard Scott O'Grady speak of his experiences. He noted that Mr. O'Grady was an excellent speaker with very interesting experiences to share. PAGE FIFTY -FOUR -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 9) Noted that Cornerstone Community Church would also be presenting a remembrance of September 11'h, and indicated that additional information could be obtained by calling 674 -8661. 10) Indicated that he was happy the City responded and took care of the fish problem. Mayor Kelley commented on the following: 1) Announced the following upcoming events: Fireworks at the Diamond on August 315` Music with a View Concert Series & thanked Councilman Hickman for his remarks. She noted that the Finians would be performing on the 30' and a large turnout was anticipated. Riverside Philharmonic on September 7th and noted the pre - event for children to learn out Orchestral music and instruments. Sheriffs Posse Rodeo on Labor Day Weekend. Household Hazardous Waste Collection on September 7`h from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Historical Society Casino Night on September 14' Chamber of Commerce Business Expo on September 14' Beach Boys Concert on September 2 15`, gates open at 3 p.m. PAGE FIFTY - FIVE -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 2) Read a message from Pat Kilroy to City Workers and California Department of Forestry in thanks for their assistance with the fish kill. 3) Noted a letter from Pro Marine donating antique light posts for use at the new fire station. She thanked him for his generosity. 4) Read a letter from the City of Stanton in thanks for contributions to the Samantha Runnion Fund; in response to the flowers sent by the City and the dollars raised by the City employees. 5) Congratulated Sheriff Smith on his retirement. 6) Indicated that it was nice see both Congressmen and socialize before the meeting, and thanked Congressman Calvert for his efforts and welcomed Congressman Issa to the Community. 7) Congratulated Steve & Vicki Wallace on their recognition and indicated that they were very deserving of the award. 8) Encouraged attendance at the Cops for Kids fund - raiser. 9) Indicated that she was looking forward to the Study Session on Council Policy and the Code of Ethics; and noted that the City Attorney needed to cover information on Conflict of Interest Codes. She stressed that there were policies that needed to be delved into to make sure they were being followed, to protect the City from future lawsuits. She further stressed the need for Council to be on the same page and be sure any information released was accurate. She looked forward to the Study Session. 10) Advised that the Recreation Brochure was out and encouraged participation in those programs. PAGE FIFTY - SIX -CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 2002 City Manager Watenpaugh acknowledged and thanked the City staff who assisted with clean -up of the recent fish kill. Mayor Kelley also thanked the crews that quickly cleaned -up the fish. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BUCKLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:11 P.M. ENIE KELLEY MA� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AT ST: Ij VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE