HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-26-2004 City Council MinutesMINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Buckley at 5:00
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE,
SCHIFFNER,BUCKLEY
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KELLEY
Also present were: Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold,
Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director
Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake & Aquatic Resource
Director Kilroy, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Information/
Communications Manager Dennis, Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio,
Planning Manager Villa, Public Works Manager Payne, Recreation &
Tourism Manager Fazzio, City Treasurer Weber and City Clerk/Human
Resources Director Kasad.
CLOSED SESSION
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING
LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9)
County of Riverside, et al v. City of Lake Elsinore and Laing-CP Lake
Elsinore LLC (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC418775)
(F:52.2)(X:40.1)
City Attorney Leibold announced that there was no need for discussion of the
Page Two -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
above listed Closed Session item.
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 5:05
P.M.
RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION (7:00 P.M.)
Mayor Buckley reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting in Public Session at
7:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Buckley noted that the Daughters of the American Revolution would be
receiving a Proclamation, and requested that they lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by representatives of the Daughters of the
American Revolution.
A. Proclamation -Constitution Weelc. (F:122.1)
Mayor Buckley read and presented the Proclamation which was continued
from the last meeting to representatives Joyce Hohenadl, Faye Bishop,
Imogene Llewellyn and Helen Chadwick.
Mrs. Hohenadl detailed the requirements for membership in the Daughters
of the American Revolution and announced an essay contest being
sponsored by the Menifee Valley Chapter. She indicated that the contest
was open to 5th through 8th grade students, with the topic of "Along the Trail
with Lewis and Clark". She detailed the prizes and encouraged
participation.
INVOCATION -MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER
Mayor Buckley called forward the representatives of the Lake Providence
Page Three -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Missionary Baptist Church and jointly they led the meeting in a moment of silent
prayer.
B. Proclamation - SOt" Anniversary -Lake Providence Missionarv Ba tp ist
Church. (F:122.1)
Mayor Buckley noted that the Lake Providence Missionary Baptist Church
had been in the community for 50 years and read and presented the
Proclamation.
Representatives of the Church, including Pastor Alexander accepted the
Proclamation and thanked the Council for this recognition.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
HICKMAN, KELLEY,
MAGEE, SCHIFFNER,
BUCKLEY
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NONE
.Also present were: Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold,
Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director
Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake & Aquatic Resources
Director Kilroy, Police Chief Fetherolf, Engineering Manager Seumalo,
Planning Manager Villa, Public Works Manager Payne, Recreation &
Tourism Manager Fazzio, City Treasurer Weber, City Clerk/Human
Resources Director Kasad.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Leibold reported that the Closed Session discussion as listed on the
agenda was not held.
Page Four -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
PUBLIC COMMENTS -NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS -1 MINUTE
No Comments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS -NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES
Requests were received to address the following item and deferred to that
discussion:
Item No. 37.
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOVED BY MAGEE, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS
PRESENTED,
1. The following Minutes were approved:
a. Joint Study Session -September 28, 2004. (F:44.4)
b. Regular City Council Meeting -October 12, 2004.
The following Minutes were received and filed:
c. Planning Commission Meeting -September 7, 2004. (F:60.3)
d. Planning Commission Meeting -September 21, 2004.
2. Ratified Warrant List for October 14, 2004. (F:12.3)
3. Approved Change Order No. 1 and Accepted Notice of Completion for
Machado Street Pavement Rehabilitation for R.J. Noble Company. (F:156.2)
4. Approved use of $108,476 in Traffic Impact Fees and $41,524 from the
Traffic Safety Fund; and directed staff to implement the design and
Page Five -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
construction of a traffic signal at Grand Avenue and Broadway Street.
(F:162.4)
Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator for handling the Claim
Against the City, submitted by Salvador Linares (CL #2004-07), and
directed the City Clerk to send a letter advising the Claimant of this
decision. (F:52.2)
6. Approved Cornet Service Level Contract for Fiscal Year 2004-05. (F:68.1)
7. Approved Yearly Software Maintenance Agreement and License for
Sungard H.T.E., Inc. (F:68.1)(X:65.1)
PUBLIC HEARING
21. Canyon Hills Market Place -Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 &
2004-10 (Canyon Hills Specific Plan). (F:58.2)(X:150.2)
Mayor Buckley opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
Community Development Director Brady detailed this item and noted that it
was made up of two sites at Railroad Canyon and Canyon Hills Road. He
advised that the item was before the Planning Commission on October 19tH,
and they recommended approval. He indicated that there were several
Conditional Use Permits approved at the same time; and highlighted the
proposed site plan. He noted that there were a number of smaller pads
including a service station a Tube & tune facility and a bank, as well as a
market and outdoor seating area. He advised that the architecture and
design were consistent with the Specific Plan and carried similar stone
work. He advised that the final map for this item would come forward at
the next meeting and recommended approval for both parcels.
Mayor Buckley asked those persons interested in this item to speak. There
were no public comments.
Councilman Hickman indicated that he liked the outside rest area. He
Page Six -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
inquired if there would be restaurants located in the immediate vicinity of
that feature. Community Development Director Brady deferred to the
applicant.
Colton Sudberry, representing the applicant, indicated that some fast food
uses were proposed and noted the locations. He advised that they were also
proposing a restaurant surrounding the courtyard as a heartbeat of the
project. He explained that they tried to merchandise food locations around
the public places.
Councilman Hiclanan noted that the location of this center was where the
middle school had been.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated that she lives in the Canyon Hills
development, but several miles away from this project, so there would not
be a conflict. She advised that she had no problems with area 4 of this
project, however she had some questions and concerns with area 3. She
noted that there were a lot of building pads, mostly automotive and two
drive-thru restaurants in close proximity. She noted that the automotive
repair uses were more level with the street, and the other buildings had a
landscaped slope. She expressed concern that the auto repair and outdoor
storage was closer to the road and more visible. Mr. Sudberry clarified their
proposal, and explained that the use would be a Big O Tires, with no repair
garage. He explained that the building was elevated and would blend
pretty well with the rest of the uses. He indicated that area 3 was an
irregular shaped parcel, so the uses were difficult to configure to the site.
He indicated that they were concentrating the food users and plaza area in
area 4 with the major tenants. He displayed the Big O Tires elevation.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated that as she was driving down Railroad
Canyon, she was very concerned about it, but noted that Condition 16
required " no outdoor storage". Mr. Sudberry requested that the Condition
be amended to say "unless allowed by permit". Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
stressed her concern with auto storage. Mr. Sudberry indicated that the
"outdoor storage" was snore related to the market and drug stores for
Page Seven -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
seasonal or sidewalk sales, and not the auto dealers. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
inquired if the applicant had signed with markets or restaurants for the site.
Mr. Sudberry indicated that they had not, but would be bringing them back
soon. He advised that they were talking with Carl's Jr., Del Taco and
Farmer Boys. He noted that there was a limit to the shops that could go
into a center like this. He explained that banks and fast food restaurants
have drive-thrus which are more conducive to area 3 than area 4. Mayor
Pro Tem Kelley inquired who they had signed for area 4. Mr. Sudberry
indicated that they had signed letters of intent from Bank ofAmerica, a drug
store, Blockbuster Video, Starbuck's Coffee, etc. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
stressed that her only concerns were with area 3. She noted that the
applicant was required to include stone facades on the development. Mr.
Sudberry indicated that they had requested a change to that condition. He
explained that they had done retain development for 25 years and this would
be their seventh center for Pardee,. and noted their attention to landscaping
and the buildings. He reiterated that area 3 had some of the uses due to the
shape of the property, which limits what they can develop. He stressed
their interest in providing goods and services the community needs for a
good balance. He indicated that with regard to the trash enclosures, staff
felt there should be some stone veneer to dress them up, but their practice
had been to provide landscape screening. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated
that she appreciated the designs with plants, boulders, etc, but noted that she
would be very picky on the signage for the project.
City Treasurer Weber noted that he also lives in Canyon Hills and explained
the two lane roads in each direction with trees in the middle. He expressed
hopes that the residents would not be looking at garage doors on repair
shops. Mr. Sudberry indicated that the back of the facility would not be
seen, due to the slopes. He clarified the potential views for the project.
City Treasurer Weber questioned the noticing for this project. Assistant
City Manager Best clarified the requirements fora 300 foot perimeter
around the project. City Treasurer Weber stressed that this was a major
entrance and more thought should have gone into telling a few more people
about the plans.
Page Eight -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley noted that there was a sign on the property. City
Treasurer Weber stressed that he did not know it would be considered
tonight. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley stressed that the existing sign delineated the
types of uses to be constructed. City Treasurer Weber reiterated that it did
not state that it would be heard tonight.
Councilman Hickman requested that the applicant make sure the parking lot
was big enough to hold SUV's. Mr. Sudberry indicated that the stores were
catching on to that issue and requiring bigger stalls. Mayor Buckley asked
staff if there was movement toward getting rid of compact spaces.
Community Development Director Brady indicated that planning
discourages compact spaces as this point. Mr. Suberry clarified that they
were not proposing any compact spaces.
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
N0.2004-02, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW N0.2004-02 BASED ON
ATTACHMENTS A THROUGH F AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS
AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
Mayor Buckley closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m.
FINDINGS
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10
The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan. The General Plan designates the affected sites as "Canyon Hills Specific Plan". The
Zoning classifies the affected sites as "C2, General Commercial" and "Cl, Neighborhood
Commercial", respectively. The proposed Commercial Design Review applications evaluate design
of the Canyon Hills Market Place which implements the intended land use of the affected sites.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Page Nine -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 propose the Canyon Hills Market Plan which
has been designed in accordance with the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and
varying views as a person moves along Railroad Canyon Drive and Canyon Hills Road. The projects
complement the design quality of existing and future development by creating avisually-pleasing
commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are
original and attractive.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in
any signiftcant adverse environmental impacts.
The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which
was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the
necessary environmental clearances for the proposed applications. The proposed commercial uses are
either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Accordingly,
staff believes the proposed applications implement the land use objectives and requirements of the
Specific Plan and finds that further environmental evaluation is therefore, unnecessary.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees
and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject
project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC), Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 include conditions of
approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING DIVISION
General Conditions
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the
City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Consultants or Agents to attach, set
aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concerning implementation and construction of the Canyon Hills Marketplace, which action is
bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or
66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of
any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If
the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall
not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
2. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills
Page Ten -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Specific Plan.
3. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan will revert to
the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are constructed.
4. The applicant shall provide all applicable project-related onsite and offsite improvements as
described in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document and Tentative Tract Map No. 30496.
The applicant shall implement appropriate mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
6. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on aproject-by-project basis. If determined
necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis
will be required.
Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site prepazation and
construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM
and shall cease at 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on
Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
8. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust
suppression along project and perimeter streets and other connecting roads shall be applied to
minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering,
application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize
vehicle generated dust.
Conditions For Commerciai Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-IO
9. Approval for Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 will lapse and be void unless a
building permit is issued within two years of the approval date. An extension of time, up to one (1)
yeaz may be granted by the Community Development Director prior to the expiration of the initial
Commercial Design Review approval upon application by the applicant and payment of required fees
one (1) month prior to expiration.
10. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved
site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to
the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan
Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning
Commission/City Council through subsequent action.
11. Any alteration or expansion of this Design Review approval shall be reviewed according to the
provisions of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
Page Eleven -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
12. Mechanical equipment will be sufficiently screened by the building parapets or other screening
materials or methods to ensure said equipment is not publicly visible, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee.
13. All trash enclosures shall comply with the City's detail for trash enclosures and shall provide other
enhancements deemed appropriate by the applicant and the Community Development Director or
designee.
14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the
Community Development Director or designee.
I5. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction trailers utilized during
construction. All construction trailers shall require a cash bond in the amount of $1,000.00 to be
processed through the Planning Division.
16. No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted, except if related to those temporary uses
and/or events that are allowed by issuance of a City temporary use permit.
17. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed onsite so as not to create glare onto neighboring
property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures
shall match the architectural style of the building.
18. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed or architecturally screened and painted to match the
exterior color of the building as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee.
19. The Community Development Director or designee shall review and approve final architectural plans
to ensure all cornice elements shall be raised, the number of diamond ceramic tiles are reduced on
certain elevations, and the back sides of those parapets that are exposed to public view are
architecturally enhanced.
20. AlI drive aisles and loading areas shall be kept and maintained free and clear of any
materials/merchandise so as not to obstruct onsite circulation and deliveries.
21. All parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch lines, that are two feet apart.
22. A 12-inch concrete paver along the side of parking stalls that are adjacent to planters (paver to
include curb width) shall be provided.
23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height shalt have a permanent irrigation system and
erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division.
Page Twelve -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
24. Streetprint shall be provided at all driveway entrances. Onsite landscaping shall be enhanced at all
entry areas and major intersections and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Director or designee.
25. The applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
26. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted.
27. All service and loading doors shall be painted to match the building.
28. Onsite surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
Prior to Building/Cradine Per~rrit Issuance
29. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning
Division for inclusion in the case records.
30. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building
Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy and release of utilities.
31. Prior to issuance of the first certiFcate of occupancy for each Planning Area, the entire site parking
lot, entry driveways, perimeter and internal landscaping, offsite improvements, etc. shall be
completed as indicated on the approved plans, or a construction site improvement phasing plan for
that particular Planning Area as approved by the Community Development Director.
32. Three (3) sets of the Final LandscapingQrrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and
approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or
designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be
chazged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%) City
fee.
• All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and
grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods.
• Applicant shall plant street trees selected from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty
feet (40') apart and at least twenty-four-inch (24") box in size.
• All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6")
wide concrete curb.
Page Thirteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
• Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches
(36").
• Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the
LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines.
• Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan
and screened as part of the landscaping plan.
• The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of
the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought
resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive
watering.
• All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from
installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the
applicant at the end of the required two years with approvaUacceptance by the Landscape
Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee.
• All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a
Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings
in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants.
• Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan.
• Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
33. The applicant shall establish and record a reciprocal shared pazking agreement with the County of
Riverside which allows all future commercial tenants and users to share parking onsite.
34. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Manager prior to issuance of building permits and
final approval.
35. The applicant shall prepare a signage program which illustrates community theme signage,
directional signs, monuments, etc., subject to approval by the Community Development Director or
designee.
36. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements,
where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project.
37. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and
Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management
Page Fourteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan.
38. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-serve
letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services.
39. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company.
40. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company.
41. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company.
42. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the
Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid.
43. Bus shelters shall be designed consistently with the materials and colors of the proposed Canyon
Hills Market Place.
ENGINEERING DII~ISION
44. Construct fourth leg of existing signal at Canyon Hills Drive and Railroad Canyon Road to provide
access to this site. Signal shall be operational prior to first Certificate of Occupancy.
45. Provide deceleration lane at southerly entrances for both the eastbound and westbound sides of
Railroad Canyon Road. Deceleration lane shall be designed and constructed to Caltrans standards.
46. All landscaping and signage for both planning areas shall be designed and constructed to preserve
traffic sight distances consistent with Caltrans standards.
47. Provide for long-term barricade and erosion control methods at the stubbed street at the southwest
end of the property in Planning Area 3.
48. Entrance drive aisles for both Planning Areas shall be clear from parking spaces or intersecting drive
aisles for a minimum of 40 feet measured from the curb line of the project entrance.
49. Building structures shall not encroach onto established easements.
50. Provide adetention / desiltation basin to mitigate for the difference in flows (developed and
undeveloped)forthe 100-year storm.
51. All off-site grading, non-historic drainage and/or construction shall be notarized and have recorded
letter(s) of permission.
Page Fifteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
52. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval.
53. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section
16.52.030 (LEMC) and be consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District.
54. All street improvements, including traffic signals, shall be installed and functioning prior to
certificate of occupancy.
55. Pay all Capita] Improvement and Plan Check Fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26), mitigation fees,
area drainage fee, traffic impact fee (TIF), encroachment permit fees and inspection fees associated
with the project and its development.
56. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency
stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to
final map approval.
57. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be
approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC .16.34).
58. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil
Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department
standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34).
59. Enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and post the
appropriate bonds prior to final map approval.
60. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8
%" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public
works improvements will be scheduled and approved.
61. Install permanent survey monuments in compliance with the City's Municipal Code.
62. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent.
63. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department.
64. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as
required by the City Engineer.
65. Install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations.
Page Sixteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
66. Submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to
final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public
improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the
development.
67. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant
shall submit tapes and/or disks which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or the applicant shall
pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing.
68. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving
utility.
69. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A
grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the
grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined
by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a
grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be
conducted before grading begins.
70. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final
soils report showing compliance with recommendations.
71. An Alquist-Priolo shidy shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or
liquefaction zones present on-site. A letter certifying that the site is clear of these hazards will be
required if mitigation is not identified.
72. All grading shall be done m~der the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all
slopes steeper than 2 to I for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater
than 30 fr. in height shall be contoured.
73. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant shall provide to the City with a map of all
proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Engineer.
74. Provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul
roads. In the event of damage to such roads, the applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads
to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-
of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
75. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners
by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
Page Seventeen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
76. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of--way should be contained within drainage
easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage
easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions".
77. All natural drainage traversing the sites shall be conveyed through the sites, or shall be collected and
conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
78. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations.
79. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding flood plain management.
80. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the
Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. The applicant shall mitigate
any flooding and/or erosion caused by development ofthe sites and diversion of drainage.
81. All drainage facilities shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards.
82. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prohibit illegal dumping in the drain
system; the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer.
83. ]0-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff shall be
contained within the street right-of--way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities
shall be installed.
84. Install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the
watershed.
85. The applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan
prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction
which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance
responsibilities.
86. Provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants
from parking areas and driveways. Grading plans shall include details of the erosion control
provisions.
87. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual If site
distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of
landscaping and wall placement.
Page Eighteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
88. AlI parcels shall have direct access to public rights-of--way or be provided with a minimum 30-foot
ingress and egress easement to public right-of--way by separate instrument or through map
recordation.
89. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the applicant
shall be required to contract with CR&R, Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris,
vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other
phases of construction.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
90. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Riverside County
Fire Department (as attached).
POLICE DEPARTMENT
91. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Police
Department (as attached).
COMMUNITYSERVICESbEPARTMENT
92. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
93. The applicant to maintain all onsite landscaping.
94. The applicant to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris and removal
(Chapter 8.16 LEMC).
95. The applicant to comply with all NPDES regulations.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
96. The applicant shall comply with all recommendation and requirements identified in the attached
letter from Riverside Transit Agency dated April 29, 2004.
BUSINESS ITEMS
31. Second Reading -Ordinance No. 1129 -Zone Change 2004-01 -The Sauls
Company. (F:172.1)
Page Nineteen -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
MOVED BY MAGEE,
BY HICKMAN TO ADOPT
ORDINANCE NO. 1129, UPON SECOND READING, BY TITLE ONLY:
ORDINANCE NO. 1129
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.
2004-O1, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM "RR-
RURAL RESIDENTIAL" TO Rl -SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL," UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ON 10+
ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES NORTHEAST
OF THE INTERSTATE 15/STATE HIGHWAY 74 (CENTRAL
AVENUE) INTERCHANGE, AT THE SOUTHERN END OF TRELLIS
LANE, SOUTH OF SHARON STREET, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110-021.
UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY,
MAGEE, SCHIFFNER,
BUCKLEY
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
32. Design Review of Residential Project NO. R 2004-06 -Ali Salman -16420
Jo, Street. (F:138.2)
Community Development Director Brady indicated that this was a design
review for seven apartment units on Joy Street adjacent to Machado
Elementary School. He noted that the development would be required to
Page Twenty -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
participate in the CFD for Public Safety and the Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District. He detailed the unit sizes and indicated that they
would include attached garages.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired about the plans, and noted a reference to
chain link fences coming down and being replaced with tubular fences.
Community Development Director Brady clarified that the fences would be
tubular wrought iron.
Councilman Hickman addressed the fences and requested that there be a
requirement for round tubular, instead of square tubular to prevent corrosion
and rust. Community Development Director Brady indicated that he could
bring it to the developer's attention. Councilman Hickman questioned
crime problems in the existing units on Joy Street. Chief Fetherolf indicated
that there was nothing that stood out.
Mayor Buckley questioned the addition of a condition to require
participation in the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program.
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW FOR
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 FOR SEVEN APARTMENT
UNITS TO BE ADDED TO A SIX UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AND
RELATED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET,
BASED ON THE EXHIBITS AND FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH THE ADDITION OF A CRIME
FREE MULTI-HOUSING PROGRAM CONDITION.
FINDINGS
The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Page Twenty-One -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Section and the planning
district in which the site is located.
CONDITIONS
GENERAL CONDITION
The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless
the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul
an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the
Tentative Condominium Map, which action is bought within the time period provided for in
California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code
Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
PLANNING DIVISION
2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. R 2004-06 will lapse and be void
unless building permits are issued within one (1) year of City Council approval. The Community
Development Director may grant an extension of time of up to one (1) year per extension, prior
to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval. Application for a time extension must be
submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore one (1) month prior to the expiration date.
3. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the
Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
4. AlI site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the
approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall
be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for
Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of
Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action.
5. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment
incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that
they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof
equipment shall match the primary wall color. Wall or window mounted air conditioners shall
not be allowed.
Page Twenty-Two -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
6. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto
neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture.
All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building and shall be approved by the
CDD or Designee.
7. Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
8. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community
Development Director or Designee.
9. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire rating.
10. The applicant shall meet all Building and Safety Division requirements.
11. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and
used during construction. Bands will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the
site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or
designee.
12. The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be
limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction
activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays.
13. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction
generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal
Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures
shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer.
14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by
the Community Development Director or designee.
15. A decorative masonry 6 foot block wall shall be installed along all side and rear property lines.
This wall shall include pilasters at corners and every 50 feet. A 5 foot tubular steel fence shall be
installed along the front property line. The City standard 6 foot wood fence shall be installed
between each unit's rear private open space areas.
16. The applicant shall install the City standard 6 foot wood fence between the existing unit's rear
private open space areas.
17. Decorative paving shall be included at the drive entryways and shall be shown on the
construction drawings submitted to Building and Safety.
18. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
Page Twenty-Three -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
19. Any exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the exterior colors of the building.
20. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant.
21. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet (2') apart.
22. Any proposed mailboxes shall be located in decorative housings which incorporate similar
materials, colors, and textures utilized on the proposed building. The area for mailboxes should
be of sufficient size to enable residents to pick up or deposit mail without encroaching on
landscaping or parking.
23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent irrigation system
and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division.
24. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of
Riverside for a Certificate of Fee Exemption "de Minimis Impact Finding. The check shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval.
PRIOR TO B UILDING/GRADING PERMITS
25. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete
an "Acknow]edgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning
Division for inclusion in the case records.
26. The building addresses shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible
from the public right-of--way. Developer shall obtain street addresses for each unit prior to
issuance of building permits. The addresses shall be displayed near the entrance.
27. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and
approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development
Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection
Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty
percent (40%) City fee. The applicant shall include plans to include revising the existing unit's
front landscaped areas.
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100%
plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation
methods.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree List,
maximum of forty feet(40) apart and at least twenty-four-inch (24") box in size.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved azeas with a six inch (6") high and
six inch (6") wide concrete curb.
Page Twenty-Four -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to
provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (IS) yeazs.
f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on
landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan.
g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all
requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the
use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation
system to be used to prevent excessive watering.
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two
years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be
requested by the applicant at the end of the required two yeazs with
approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development
Director or Designee.
i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase
at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting
areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and
plants.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan.
k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
28. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and
final approval.
29. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to
the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid.
30. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of
the Riverside County Fire Department have been met
31. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at time of
building permit issuance.
32. The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Local
Development Mitigation Fee of $859.00 per dwelling unit (fee for density greater that 14.1
Page Twenty-Five -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
dwelling units per acre) prior to obtaining building permits.
PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
33. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to final approval.
34. The landscaped areas noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be installed and approved
prior to final approval. Approval is based on the completion of all irrigation and planting as
noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans.
35. The applicant shall annex into the Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2003-01 thereby
offsetting the annual negative fiscal impacts on public safety operations.
Added to Conditions of Approval at City Council 10-26 2004
ENGINEERING DIVISION
36. Pay all development fees, including area drainage, TIF and TUMF.
37. Provide drainage plan including hydrology and hydraulic information.
38. Provide clean water mitigation for construction activities as well as post construction operations.
39. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified
in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to issuance of building pernit.
40. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section
16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District.
41. Pay all Capital hnprovement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 8526).
42. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency
stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter
prior to issuance of building permit.
43. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must
be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34)..
44. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil
Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34).
45. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works
improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to issuance of Building Permit.
Page Twenty-Six -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
46. Interior streets shall be designed with 9% as the desired grade and intersecting streets shall meet
at a maximum grade of 6
47. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division
for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78).
48. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated
on 8 %z" x 1 I" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of
public works improvements will be scheduled and approved.
49. The applicant shall install two (2) permanent bench marks to Riverside County Standazds and at
a location to be determined by City Engineer.
50.
~-'~ a..°' --~°~ °~~-~~ °' (Deleted, does not apply to project)
Revised at Plaanirzg Comnaissiora Meeting October 5, 2004
51. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent.
'_,.., "- '"~ ram ~'~~~°~~- (Deleted, does not apply to project)
Revised at Plaaning Commission Meeting October S, 2004
53. Developer shall annex to the City's Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District.
54. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations.
55. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be
approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to Final
inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for
streets within the tract.
56. All utilities except electrical over 12 I<v shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving
utility.
57. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A
grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the
grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as
determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is
not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern
inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
Page Twenty-Seven -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
58. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final
soils report showing compliance with recommendations.
59. An Alquis-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults
and/or liquefaction zones present on-site.
60. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all
slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes
greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured.
61. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all
proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to
the review and approval of the City Engineer.
62. Applicant to provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed
public CiTy haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of
restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of
damages to the public right-of--way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
63. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of--way should be contained within
drainage easements shown on the final-txap the precise grade plan. A note should be added to
the €tnal-map precise grading plan stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings
and obstructions."
Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2004
64. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and
conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
65. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations.
66. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management.
67. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies
68. c ~' a '~ ~ a~~ ri H ri I' T2 t a i ~. n• ~ a w
. Delete,
condition has been covered by Conditions No. 36 and 63.
Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2004
69. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the
drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer.
70. Roof and yard drains shall not be allowed to connect directly through cuts in the street curb.
Page Twenty-Eight -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible.
71. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should
be contained within the street right-of--way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage
facilities should be installed.
72. Applicant will be required to instal] BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any
urban pollutants from entering the watershed.
73. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having Fled a Notice of Intent with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading
permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that
will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities.
74. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their
storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan
prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction
which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance
responsibilities.
75. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the
development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental
awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of
stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside CounTy
NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
76. Applicant shall provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce
storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles.
77. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual
(particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can
be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of
landscaping and wall placement.
78. Project will be required to participate in Crime Free Multi-Housing Program.
33. Approval of Final Parcel Map 32336 -Forecast Homes -North of Grand
Avenue at the end of McVicker Canyon Park Road. (F:110.2)
Community Development Director Brady commented that this was a
standard final map approval.
Page Twenty-Nine -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE FINAL PARCEL MAP 32336,
ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS; AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY
CLERK TO SIGN MAP AND ARRANGE FOR RECORDATION.
34. Thelma Ball Memorial Hall -Senior Center Annex Building. (F:144.3)
City Manager Best deferred to Community Services Staff.
Recreation and Tourism Manager Fazzio noted that on September 29`h, the
community lost a valuable volunteer, being Thelma Ball. She indicated that
Mrs. Ball began with Golden Spectrum, which ran the Senior Center. She
further indicated that she ran many fund-raisers. She noted that Bingo was
near and dear to Mrs. Ball's heart, and she was always there to oversee the
program and involved in food giveaways. She indicated that Mrs. Ball was
adamant about having a pantry at the Senior Center. She commented that
staff felt that this would be a good memorial to name something in her
honor and chose the Annex building. She noted that staff would like to
install a bronze plaque and hold a small memorial service in her honor, since
she was buried in Los Angeles and many people from the Center could not
attend. She indicated that the cost would be about $2,000 for the plaque.
Senior Center Coordinator Gulbransen commented that Mrs. Ball was a
wonderful volunteer who supported a number of programs financially. She
noted that Mrs. Ball fought Cancer for 4-1/2 years, and was an inspiration
for her efforts and the programs she facilitated. She indicated that Mrs. Ball
was dedicated to the very end, and in discussions with her daughter she
found that the family had a great deal of proud in Mrs. Ball.
Community Services Director Sapp added that he had worked with Mrs.
Ball for fifteen years and the Senior Center annex was there because Mrs.
Ball fought for it and supported the City. He indicated that her passion,
stubbornness and devotion would be missed.
Page Thirty -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Mayor Buckley questioned when the memorial would be held.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented that this was a very appropriate
recognition.
MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE STAFF'S REQUEST TO NAME THE
"ANNEX" BUILDING AT THE SENIOR CENTER THE "THELMA BALL
MEMORIAL HALL" AND ALLOCATED FUNDING FOR A BRONZE
PLAQUE AS A MEMORIAL TO SOMEONE WHO DEDICATED MUCH
OF HER LATER LIFE TO THE LAKE ELSINORE SENIOR CENTER.
35. Hazard Mitigation Plan -Resolution No. 2004-64.(F:74.1)
Assistant City Manager Best noted that the Hazard Mitigation Plan was a
regional plan for the County, which assists the City and all participating
jurisdictions in gaining grant funds.
Public Works Manager Payne explained that this request was for acceptance
of the countywide plan, and noted that each Council Member had received a
copy of the plan. He presented a Power Point presentation detailing the
goals and components of the plan. He thanked Phil McCormick from the
Office of Emergency Services for his assistance in this process. He
explained that the development of the plan began about a year ago, with the
County taking a regional approach and Lake Elsinore participating with 24
cities in the development of the plan. He noted that the City assembled a
work team from all City departments and the final plan identifies the
potential hazards in the community and establishes means to reduce the
impacts. He advised that with the adoption of this plan the City will be
eligible for FEMA funds, in the case of future natural disasters.
Mayor Buckley inquired if the plan had been reviewed by the Public Safety
Advisory Commission, prior to Council consideration. Assistant City
Manager Best indicated that if it was approved tonight, it would go to the
Page Thirty-One -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Commission.
Mayor Buckley inquired if annual approval would be required. Public
Works Manager Payne indicated that it would probably be appropriate to
review the plan for annual updates. Mayor Buckley suggested that next
year the review process start with the Public Safety Advisory Commission.
Assistant City Manager Best indicated that approval of the resolution was
needed tonight to meet the County deadline.
Councilman Hickman thanked Mr. McCormick for his work.
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION N0.2004-64,
ACCEPTING THE PLAN.
RESOLUTION N0.2004-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.
36. Lake Elsinore Rental Housing Safety Program -Ordinance No. 1130.
(F:87.1)
Community Development Director Brady highlighted the program regarding
rental housing units throughout the City. He advised that there were about
12,000 rental housing units in the City, with about 18% being multi-family
units. He explained that the intent was to develop a program to ensure that
the rental residents have a safe and decent place to live. He advised that
The program as proposed in the Ordinance would eventually require all
rental units to be inspected by the City. He indicated that a requirement
also currently exists that each unit obtain a business license from the City as
well; however a number of units are not yet licensed. He stressed that the
purpose of licensing was to ensure that the units were meeting minimum
Page Thirty-Two -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
standards. He indicated that under the program both the interior and
exterior of the properties would be inspected. He advised that the Crime
Free Multi-Housing Program would work hand-in-hand with this program;
and indicated that Code Enforcement would also be participatory in the
program. He indicated that this program would provide much safer housing
for the residents, a decrease in crime and an increase in property values.
He noted earlier questions on this program and advised that the City
Council had funded $235,000 for implementation of the program. He
further advised that part of the cost of the program would be off-set by a fee
for inspection of the units. He indicated that the intent was to bring the
units into compliance and noted that the inspection certificates would be
good for two years if the units are found to be in compliance. He
commented that Councilman Magee had questioned the noticing of the
program; and indicated that many of the properties were participating in
Crime Free Multi-Housing Program and they had been advised that this
program was coming forward. He indicated that if the intent was to notify
the property owners throughout the City, staff would do an outreach to
notify them of the program. He noted that the proposed fee was provided to
give the Council an idea of the cost structure, and indicated that it would be
an incentive that if they participate in the inspections, the fee would be
reduced to increase participation. He indicated that staff would notify the
property owners and bring the matter back for consideration at a later
meeting; most likely in November.
Mayor Buckley commented that this item was being continued, but noted
that if anyone owned rental property, this program was coming and there
would be a fee attached to the inspections. He noted that it would cover all
rental units in the City and indicated that anyone with questions could call
City Hall over the next couple of weeks.
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO A DATE NOT
CERTAIN TO ALLOW FOR FURTHER PROPERTY OWNER
NOTIFICATION.
Page Thirty-Three -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
37. Benefit Audit. (F:116.1)(X:44.1)
Mayor Buckley addressed the benefit audit and highlighted the agenda
report. He indicated that the cost of the audit would not exceed $18,000,
but noted the need for certain legal assistance on the audit. He requested
that Conrad & Associates be authorized to proceed with the audit, in
addition to authorization for up to $7,000 for the use of Personnel Attorney
Steven Filarsky. Councilman Magee concurred with this recommendation
and looked forward to Council approval so the sub-committee could
proceed.
Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest, expressed concern with the use of Conrad
& Associates. She noted that it had been reported that the Administrative
Services Director, who handles tax money, has worked for this auditor in
the past, in another City.. She questioned the potential conflict of interest.
She commented that the audit included Health/Wellness and the Warrant
List, and noted that the Director collects Health and Wellness. She
suggested pursuing an auditor who had never had contact with any
employees. She stressed that she had a real problem with this issue and
would be contacting the FPPC to determine whether a conflict of interest
existed.
Ron LaPere, 16867 Wells, indicated that a precedent had been set on many
things throughout the City, particularly regarding benefits for staff and
elected officials. He noted that one of the elected officials was the
Treasurer, who received benefits comparable to the City Council. He noted
that the official could either receive or reject the benefits, but they were the
same as those provided to the Council. He commented that the Council
took action this year to approve the benefits, with which he had no problem;
but suggested that there was a minor issue in that the action did not take into
account that the benefits took effect on January 1S`. He clarified that the
total cost of benefits paid, had not been authorized by the Council, and
suggested making the motion on this item retroactive to January 1St. He
suggested that in light of the benefit audit, he would not think the Council
Page Thirty-Four -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
would want the matter coming back at the Council, when it could be taken
care of in a positive way. He suggested that this matter should be revisited,
in all fairness to the City Treasurer.
City Treasurer Weber questioned the need for retroactive action, since the
Treasurer had always received the benefits. He clarified that the benefits he
received were medical and dental, and indicated that he could have obtained
those benefits through his employer. He indicated that this issue was
different from what was being reviewed by the audit. He stressed that he
did not buy lunch or go to the bar. He indicated that he did not think there
was an issue of him having to pay that money back.
Mayor Buckley clarified that the audit was not related to the Ca1PERS
benefits, as those were placed in the budget for payment. He suggested that
if there was action taken retroactively, he would assume it would have to go
retroactive for several years. He clarified that the concern was a failing in
matching procedure, precedent and policy. He questioned the expenditure
of $11,000 in six months on the Treasurer's benefits. Administrative
Services Director Pressey clarified that the numbers presented were year to
date, in total since January.
Councilman Magee indicated that Commissioner La Pere brought up a
procedural matter, that should be addressed with the audit. He noted that
part of the intent of the audit was to make sure things did not slip through
the cracks. He stressed if something was missing, it would be corrected and
appropriate action would be taken.
Councilman Schiffner concurred with Councilman Magee.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented that by accepting and adopting the
budget, the Council had endorsed the Treasurer benefits.
Mayor Buckley suggested that was one of the things that would be looked
at.
Page Thirty-Five -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Councilman Schiffner concurred that the benefits were accepted in the
budget annually, and suggested that the same situation existed with
Health/Wellness, over the years. He indicated that it was strange that one
issue would cause such a stir, but in a flash the issue of City Treasurer
benefits was corrected without comment, while tremendous issues were
made of something amounting to about the same amount of money, being
Health/Wellness.
Councilman Hickman suggested that this discussion was getting off track.
He noted Mrs. Hyland's comment about conflict of interest; and clarified
that the sub-committee was going to conduct interviews. He inquired if
they did not like Conrad & Associates, if they would go back out for bids
since the original time line had been missed. He indicated that nothing was
written in stone about selecting this company.
Councilman Magee addressed Councilman Schiffner regarding the City
Treasurer benefit package and concurred that it was the same amount, but
stressed that despite his insistence, staff failed to bring Health and Wellness
for action.
Mayor Buckley inquired if retroactive action should be taken with regard to
the Treasurer's benefits. City Attorney Leibold suggested that it would be
unusual to go back further than this year's budget. She noted that the
monies had already been paid and the budget had been endorsed annually,
but indicated that she would be happy to review the issue.
Mayor Buckley questioned the comments regarding a conflict of interest.
City Attorney Leibold indicated that there was a prohibition in decision
making if someone had a financial interest. She clarified that "financial
interest" was defined as income received in the last twelve months. She
indicated that it was her understanding that any income from this company
was much longer than twelve months ago. She advised that there was no
conflict of interest and this would not disqualify the Administrative Services
Director from participating in the audit.
Page Thirty-Six -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
Administrative Services Director Pressey clarified that he worked for the
company about six years ago, for eight and a half years. He indicated that
his next City ended up hiring them as auditors. He stressed that he had
publicly disclosed his past relationship and there had been no problem. He
indicated that in his past capacity he coordinated the audit as the accounting
administrator, while working with this auditing firm. He commented that in
his mind there was no conflict, as the records were available and open. He
indicated that he felt they would do an objective independent audit, while he
would just be providing records and answering questions.
Mayor Buckley noted that he had talked with an outside CPA and the
question came up, but he confirmed that if the sub-committee was
comfortable, they could-award the bid. He noted that this issue might or
might not come up in the discussions with Conrad. He stressed that there
was clearly no legal conflict. City Attorney Leibold confirmed. Mayor
Buckley reiterated that this was a distant relationship, which was not a
problem.
MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AUTHORIZE THE SUB-COMMITTEE TO
INTERVIEW THE FIRM, AND PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE
INTERVIEW, SELECT CONRAD AND ASSOCIATES TO PERFORM THE
AUDIT AT A COST OF NO MORE THAN 518,000, AND ALLOW FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $7,000 FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE FROM
PERSONNEL ATTORNEY STEVEN FILARSKY.
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:05
P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:10 P.M.
Ebony Jolly, 331 Avenue 12, addressed the joint use contract at the new high
school, and indicated that she was shocked to learn such a decision had been
made. She expressed concern with the presence of sex offenders, who could make
_ Page Thirty-Seven -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
contact with the students in this environment. She noted that the School
Superintendent seemed to believe that a separate entrance for the library would be
adequate, and was against any compromise of hours. Mrs. Jolly suggested that
there was enough money to build a library that was separate from the schools.
She commented that children were not even safe in their own yard and noted that
she saw a registered sex offender in her neighborhood. She expressed concern
that the children would also be at risk, while in school. She inquired if the City
was prepared for lawsuits resulting from this situation.
Carrie Hughes, 3337 Spruce Street, indicated that she was also present to speak
about the joint use contract. She indicated that she had lived in the City just over a
year and had some pretty discouraging issues with break-ins, vandalism and a
motorcycle being stolen. She indicated that she had visited the Police Station on
three occasions to view information on Megan's law. She indicated that there had
been two attempted abductions in her area, that she was aware of. She
commented that it concerned her that the schools were being opened to the public.
She indicated that she is a single mother who goes to great lengths to protect her
son.
Julie Munoz, 310 Avenue 9, indicated that she was a clinical social worker,
specializing in mental health and trauma intervention. She advised that she had
three small grandchildren in the school district. She expressed concern with the
joint use contract and questioned why parents were not informed about this item.
She suggested that it was an open door to all kinds of trauma for the children of
Lake Elsinore. She expressed hopes that the Council would reconsider and closed
the facility to public uses. She stressed that there were already enough problems
with pedophiles, and terror plans on the Internet. She commented on the potential
liability to the City.
Monique Munoz, 310 Avenue 9, indicated that she had three children, two in the
school district. She indicated that she was very involved in the school and when
she found out about the contract, she was terrified. She stressed that the
registered sex offenders would have access to the children at school She noted
that while there might be security and teachers watching the children, the sense of
security was being taken away. She indicated that due to this arrangement, she
Page Thirty-Eight -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
was thinking of home schooling her children.
Ms. Miller, P. O. Box 1377, suggested that there was a need to become the united
people of the earth and indicated that everyone should vote for hydrogen fuel
cells. She suggested that everyone read the websites of people running for office
and indicated that she did not understand people who voted along party lines. She
expressed concern with a number of political candidates and provided
recommendations on the upcoming ballot measures.
John Seepe, 33411 Maple Tree Lane, indicated that it had been five years since he
attended a Council Meeting. He addressed the Constitution Week presentation and
stressed the number of dedicated people supporting the military. He noted that
Paula Graver had continued to support the troops. He indicated that Faith Baptist
Church on Walnut Street would be recognizing the military personnel and saying
thank you for their sacrifices on November 7`~' at 9:30 and 11 a.m. He stressed the
advantages of open meetings, open discussions, the ability to express opposing
views and worship freely.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
Assistant City Manager Best commented on the following:
1) Addressed the concerns regarding the School District and indicated
that she would like to speak with the group of concerned residents.
She noted that in the past the City Council and Schools had looked
for a way to fund Library services. She stressed that there was an
intent to protect the students, and indicated that the City had
requested an opportunity to be participatory in the library project.
She stressed that she was sure the entire Council was concerned for
the safety of the children.
2) Noted that City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad was
attending this meeting on her 19`x' wedding anniversary.
3) Indicated that the Council had taken action to look at an RFP for a
Page Thirty-Nine -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
4) Announced the Special City. Council meeting on November 3`a at 5
p.m.
5) Announced that the study session on Street Sweeping was being
cancelled.
6) Congratulated the Police Department on the news article today,
advising that there had been no killings in Lake Elsinore in 2003.
She expressed appreciation for their efforts.
7) Thanked City staff for their work in the last week to address issues
from the storms, dealing with flooding and failed retention basins.
She noted that a standby crew on duty for the next storm. She
announced that if there was flooding in area, there were sandbags
outside the Public Works Yard on Langstaff.
8) Announced that a CDBG meeting was being planned, so any group
applying for funding should apply on November 8th at 6 p.m. She
indicated that Community Services Director Sapp would be handling
that program.
9) Indicated that there had been a lot of information on voting, and
encouraged everyone to vote on November 2aa
10) Wished everyone a Happy Halloween.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
No Comments.
CITY TREASURER COMMENTS
City Treasurer Weber commented on the following:
Page Forty -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
1) Indicated that he would be having a meeting regarding the CFD's and
Wasson Canyon. He indicated that he did not know how much the
sale was for, but stressed the need to be sure where that money was.
2) Indicated that with regard to the audit, he receives benefits and $150
per month. He commented that the concern was persons making
$100,000 to 130,000 and getting all kinds of other benefits. He
indicated that he did not have a City credit card, but he sees people
buying wine and sangria and other things. He indicated that abuses
were occurring and he wanted to get them in check. He stressed the
need to deal with the abuses and expressed pride in Mayor Buckley
and Councilman Magee's efforts.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented on the following:
1) Wished everyone a Happy Halloween, noting that Safe Candy Night
would be held on October 31St. She noted that there were a number of
bicycles as prizes.
Councilman Hickman commented on the following:
1) Thanked Kevin Jeffries for having Congressman Isla in the area.
2) Congratulated Temescal Canyon High School for winning the contest
regarding the Constitution. He noted that Elsinore High School won
second place.
3) Congratulated the Bikini Beach Club on their opening and noted that
he was impressed with the new sports bar.
4) Wished everyone a safe Halloween and encouraged participation in
Safe Candy Night.
Councilman Schiffner commented on the following:
Page Forty-One -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
1) Noted that he had received complaints on street sweeping and tickets
and indicated that this was the first time he had heard that it was
corrected. He indicated that it could not have been corrected, as that
would require an action by the City Council. He suggested that a
study session was still needed and expressed sympathy with the
people who received tickets and those who issued tickets.
Councilman Magee commented on the following:
1) Addressed those in the audience regarding the library issue and
questioned why he had been singled out for a response. He indicated
that with regard to the Sheriff's website it was a very valuable tool;
and noted that he had found disturbing information in his area and got
a bus location changed.
2) Addressed law enforcement in the community and the concerns with
response times; and noted that police hours had been added, as well
as a Public Safety Commission and a more responsive Police Chief.
He indicated that the Council's number one priority was public safety.
3) Indicated with regard to the use of the library, he was caught off
guard, as he was not aware of it. He advised that he would like to
direct staff to contact Ebony Jolly to explain the City's role and
understanding of the prof ect. He noted that he too needed to
understand what was going on and get a clear picture of what was
proposed. He suggested a response in the form of a letter so
everyone could have a copy. He indicated that he needed to get
educated and possibly act on the matter at the next meeting.
4) Noted that new traffic lights were approved for the intersection of
Grand and Broadway in the west end. He explained that the Council
had authorized the expenditure to install the lights some time in the
next year.
Page Forty-Two -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
5) Indicated that he had received many calls about the traffic at Grand
and Highway 74. He indicated that staff was working with Caltrans
to front the money for the traffic signal, so it could be addressed in
this fiscal year. He commented that relief might be on the way.
6) Advised that for the Grand/Ontario signal, the funds had been
authorized and it was up to the County. He indicated that he had
been infonned that action should take place in January. He thanked
the Public Works staff and the contractor for the landscaping at this
location. He noted that the work was completed 13 years after the
tract was constructed.
7) Indicated that he met with representatives owning property east of the
freeway and working on the Camino del Norte CFD to implement
infrastructure and right-of--ways along Main/Franklin and into
Tuscany Hills. He requested input on how best to proceed to move
that group forward.
8) Noted that a development project had been submitted causing the
neighbors on Ulla Lane to reach out to Council. He explained that
the residents were seeking quiet title of Ulla Lane, but the developer
had quite a different opinion. He indicated that he would like an
opinion from staff, as to how to proceed. He advised that they also
shared their concerns with Mr. LaPere and he would also like to see it
resolved prior to the public hearings.
Mayor Buckley commented on the following:
1) Responded to Ms. Miller, and noted while she encouraged people not
to vote party lines, five of the individuals mentioned were Democrats.
2) Noted that the joint use library was moving forward, and explained
that the City contracts with the County Library System. He added
Page Forty-Three -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
that there were police officers stationed at the high schools, but not at
the libraries. He concurred that this issue needed to be sorted out.
He requested research on the crime number differences between joint
libraries and regular libraries.
3) Noted that the Council had unanimously endorsed Proposition lA,
but noted that he would also like people to vote against Proposition
66, which would weaken the Three Strikes Law. He noted that while
the Council had been supporting of the public safety officials and
they had done a great job, the improved statistics were reflective of
the State statistics. He indicated that this was an impact of the Three
Strikes law and people with a long history moving out of the state to
avoid the implications of the Three Strikes Law. He noted the
changes that Proposition 66 would implement and encourage
residents to vote against the Proposition.
4) Noted the November 2"d election and encourage everyone to vote
however they see fit.
5) Thanked public works for their efforts in cleaning up the mud on the
streets. He noted that the good thing about the rain was that the Lake
went up about five and a half inches, which was like free money from
the sky. He noted that more rain was on the way.
6) Announced the Special Meeting on November 3`d at 5 p.m. to
consider the recommendations of the Electoral Reform Committee.
He noted that the Committee had done a great deal of work, and the
matter was scheduled for a Special Meeting because he anticipated a
rather in-depth and detailed discussion. He indicated that he wanted
to be sure there was enough time to go through all of the details. He
encouraged public attendance at the meeting.
7) Announced the following upcoming events:
Page Forty-Four -City Council Minutes -October 26, 2004
November 7`" -Military Recognition at Faith Baptist Church at
9:30 and 11 a.m.
October 27t" -World Series Party at the Diamond Club
October 28`" -Last Chamber Mixer of the Year at Coco's - 5:30
p.m.
October 31st - Safe Candy Nigh Downtown, at dusk
November 6`" from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. -Household Hazardous
Waste Disposal
November 6`" -Student Volunteer Event at McVicker Park
November 7`" -Open Air Market
November 13t " & 14"' - GFI Grand Prix Weekend
December 11th - Holiday Home Tour, by the Historical Society
8) Reminded the Community that the Chamber of Commerce was
gathering food donations, grocery certificates or cash for HOPE at the
Chamber Office.
ADJOURNMENT
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:50
P.M.
A EST:
VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR