HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 4CITY OF
LA
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
LSII`IORE
DREAM EXTREME.
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON
AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RICHARD J. MACHOTT,
ACTING PLANNING MANAGER
DECEMBER 18, 2012
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — A REQUEST
BY PARDEE HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF BUILDING
DESIGNS FOR A TOTAL OF 87 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL UNITS, INCLUDING A MODEL HOME
COMPLEX AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS, FOR A
HOUSING PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA 37
OF CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN (LIVING SMART)
APPLICANT /: PARDEE HOMES, 10880 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1900
OWNER LOS ANGELES CA 90024
Project Request
The applicant is requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04 to allow
for design and construction of 87 single - family residential units, preliminary plotting,
conceptual wall and fence plan, and related improvements for a "Living Smart" housing
project located within Planning Area 37 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
Project Location
The Canyon Hills Specific Plan area is located within the eastern boundaries of the City
of Lake Elsinore and east of the 1 -15 Freeway. The Vicinity Map presents the location of
the identified Planning Areas within the Specific Plan. The proposed single - family
homes are located within Tract Map No. 36447. The Tract Map area is located south of
Canyon Hills Road, and east of Kalanchoe Road.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 1 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
DECEMBER 18, 2012
Environmental Setting
Project I Multi Family
Site I Residential/Vacant
Attached Residential)
Canyon Hills Specific
Plan
North
Open Space
Open Space
Canyon Hills Specific
Plan
South
Residential
SF3 (Single - Family
Canyon Hills Specific
Detached Residential )
Plan
East
Residential
SF3 (Single - Family
Canyon Hills Specific
Detached Residential )
Plan
West
Open Space
Open Space
Canyon Hills Specific
Plan
Background
In June and July, 2012, the Planning Commission and City Council approved Tentative
Tract Map No. 36447. The Tract Map was approved pursuant to the Subdivision Map
Act and the Lake Elsinore Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code.
Description of Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04
The following describes the various design components and features of the proposed
Living Smart project, including floor plans, architecture, Living Smart features, model
home complex, preliminary plotting of production units, and the conceptual wall and
fence plan.
Floor Plans For Livin4 Smart Residences
The proposed 87 -unit project will offer twelve different Living Smart plans (Living Smart
and Living Smart Meadow Ridge) throughout Planning Area 37 which are described as
follows:
Living Smart.
1. Plan 3: One -story 1,597 square foot units with four bedrooms (fourth bedroom
option den); 2.0 baths; great room; family kitchen, laundry; and two -car garage.
2. Plan 4: One -story 1,900 square foot units with four bedrooms (fourth bedroom
option den); 2.0 baths; great room; family kitchen, laundry; and two -car garage (plan
also offers a third car garage with option workshop).
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 2 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
DECEMBER 18, 2012
3. Plan 5: Two -story 2,027 square foot units with four bedrooms; 3.0 baths; great
room; family kitchen, laundry; and two -car garage (plan also offers a third car garage
with option workshop). Optional fire place is offered in the great room.
4. Plan 6: Two -story 2,315 square foot units with four bedrooms; 3.0 baths; great
room; family kitchen, laundry; and two -car garage (plan also offers a third car garage
with option workshop). Optional fire place media niche is offered in the great room.
5. Plan 7: Two -story 2,664 square foot units with five bedrooms; 3.0 baths; living room;
family room; dining room, kitchen, nook, laundry, workshop; and three -car garage.
6. Plan 7X: Two -story 2,664 square foot units with five bedrooms; 3.0 baths; living
room; family room; dining room, kitchen, nook, laundry, workshop; and three -car
garage
Livinq Smart Meadow Ridqe:
1. Plan 1: One -story 2,385 square foot units with four bedrooms (fourth bedroom
option den); 3.0 baths; great room; dining room, kitchen, laundry; and three -car
garage.
2. Plan 2: Two -story 3,244 square foot units with four bedrooms; 3.0 baths (option 4th
bath); great room; kitchen; nook; dining room (option den); loft (option bedroom 5);
game room (option bedroom 6); laundry; and three -car garage.
3. Plan 3: Two -story 3,707 square foot units with five bedrooms; 3.0 baths (option 4th
ands bath); great room; dining room; living room (option library); kitchen; den
(option formal dining room or bedroom 6); laundry; game room (bedroom 4 and
game room or an option super game room or loft); and three -car garage.
4. Plan 3X: Two -story 3,707 square foot units with five bedrooms; 3.0 baths (option 4th
and 57bath); great room; dining room; private suite with outside entry; kitchen; den
(option formal dining room or bedroom 6); laundry; game room (bedroom 4 and
game room or an option super game room or loft); and three -car garage.
5. Plan 4: Two -story 4,001 square foot units with five bedrooms; 4.0 baths (option 5th
bath); great room; dining room; kitchen; den (option bedroom 6); living suite with
outside entry; laundry; game room (option bedroom 7); and four -car garage.
6. Plan 4: Two -story 4,241 square foot units with five bedrooms; 4.0 baths (option 5th
bath); great room; dining room; kitchen; den (option bedroom 6); laundry; game
room (option bedroom 7); and three -car garage
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 3 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
DECEMBER 18, 2012
`Alternate A' Plan
It should be noted that the applicant is also proposing an 'Alternate A' Plan (included in
the submitted material) which identifies only the original Living Smart product not
including 'Living Smart Meadow Ridge.' The applicant proposes this 'Alternate A' plan
should the market not demand the larger square footage 'Meadow Ridge' home
product. The applicant has committed to come back to a Planning Commission meeting
in the near future as an informational item to alert the Planning Commission as to which
product they will be moving forward with.
Architecture and Treatments For Living Smart Residences
The proposed Living Smart project would offer five architectural styles and treatments
for the twelve plans, including Spanish, Traditional, Italian, French, and Craftsman. The
following describes each of these architectural styles:
• The Spanish Architectural Style includes concrete "S" tile roofs, decorative pipe
vents at front gable ends, plank shutters, stucco window trim, and arched entries.
• The Traditional Architectural Style includes concrete flat tile roofs, horizontal siding
accents at front gable ends, decorative shutters, vertical windows with stucco trim,
and brick veneer.
• The Italian Architectural Style includes concrete flat tile roofs, clipped gables,
projected wainscoting as color coordinated accent, decorative shutters, vertical
windows with stucco trim and soft arches at the front entries
• The French Architectural Style includes concrete flat tile roofs, clipped gables, stone
veneer, wood outlookers, and decorative shutters.
• The Craftsman Architectural Style includes concrete flat tile roofs, clipped gables,
stone veneer, wood outlookers, tapered columns and decorative shutters.
Enhanced, four -sided architectural treatments in the form of window surrounds will be
provided for all the proposed residences as a standard feature.
Living Smart Features
The proposed residences will feature a comprehensive approach to earth - friendly and
energy- saving design. The applicant, which is a certified California Green Builder, will
incorporate Living Smart features and improvements into each of the constructed
residences. The Living Smart concept is defined as being "EnergySmart", "EarthSmart",
"WaterSmart", and "HealthSmart", and is intended to promote health, and conserve
energy, water, and other vital resources.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 4 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
DECEMBER 18, 2012
Model Home Complex
A three -lot model home complex was approved with the original Living Smart project
and constructed along the Pinnata Court cul -de -sac, at the intersection with Camelina
Street. The applicant is also proposing a model home complex for the 'Meadow Ridge'
product proposed along Pursh Drive. The complex identifies models for three plans,
including Plans 1A, 3XBR and 4XC. The complex will include a handicap parking space
as well as on street parking.
Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan
To ensure design consistency, the Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan for the project
shows that those similar walls and fences that are provided elsewhere in the Canyon
Hills area will continue to be provided with the proposed project. Perimeter walls will be
split face block with pilasters. The pilasters will have pointed and bull -nose caps. Six -
foot vinyl and tubular steel fences will be provided between lots and along view lots.
Front returns will be six -foot concrete block walls.
Analysis
City Planning and Engineering Staff have reviewed the requested Design Review
application and have no concerns. Staff believes that the design amenities and features
previously approved in the immediate area are consistent with the project's architecture;
provision of Living Smart amenities and improvements; landscaping; and walls and
fences have resulted in a well- designed residential project. In addition, the project is
compatible with the overall Canyon Hills Specific Plan area and those existing and
future developments that neighbor the project site.
Environmental Determination
Environmental analysis and clearance for the proposed Design Review application is
provided by the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The 2003 Addendum to the EIR (Addendum) was
prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines and was approved
by the City Council in late 2003. The proposed project is consistent with the Canyon
Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 and therefore, will not conflict with the analysis
and findings of the 2003 Addendum. The 2003 Addendum concluded that all impacts
would be less than significant with implementation of those mitigation measures
contained in the original 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR and carried forward
to the 2003 Addendum. It should also be noted that the project is exempt from the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Further environmental action is
not required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 5 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
DECEMBER 18, 2012
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -_, recommending to the City Council adoption of the
Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and
Resolution No. 2012 -_ recommending to City Council approval of Residential Design
Review No. 2012 -04 for 87 single - family detached residential dwelling units and
associated improvements based on the Findings and Exhibits, and subject to the
proposed Conditions of Approval.
PREPARED BY: 1QC Kirt A. Coury,
Project Planner
REVIEWED/ Richard J. MacHott
APPROVED BY: Acting Planning Manager\
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolutions
3. Conditions of Approval
4. Signed Acknowledgement of 'Draft' Conditions Approval Form
5. Color and Materials booklet including Preliminary Plotting, Building Elevations
Floor Plans, Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan, and Conceptual Landscape
Plan.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 6 of 21
C
U O
N �p
p U
� J
I
W
K
O
U
ti
IS 01
a
Z U
o \
N �
� O
W 0
W O
U �
ti J
W O
l
a
r U
z Q
W \
O J
W �
K Q
Q N
O
2 �
U �
J
Q N
a �
m W
S �
J
Z m
O Z Z
Q 7 J
U U U
� Z Z
w Z
O Z 2
s s
m
r
z
0
N
y
\ d
Q \
U N
w
� a
Z O
O I
U N
1CCo �
Z
O
W
W
U
N
W
s
i
Canyon
Hills
u
a
Z
W
O
a
F
Z
VICINITY MAP
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 7 of 21
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE
PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Pardee Homes has submitted an application for Residential Design
Review No. 2012 -04 (the "Activity "), for the "Living Smart" and "Living Smart Meadow
Ridge" development of production units within Tract Map No. 36447; and
WHEREAS, Section IV(D) of the City of Lake Elsinore's MSHCP Implementing
Resolution expressly exempts from the MSHCP:
Any project for which and to the extent that vested rights to proceed with
the project notwithstanding the enactment of this Resolution exist under
the common laws of the State of California, a vesting tentative map
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, a development agreement pursuant
to Government Code section 65864 et seq., or other instrument, approved
or executed by the City prior to adoption of this Resolution. Projects
subject to this exemption must comply with all provisions of any applicable
state and federal law.
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on December 18, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the
MSHCP, the Planning Commission finds that:
The Project is exempt from the City's MSHCP Resolution by virtue of vested
rights. On July 9, 1990, the City and Pardee - Grossman /Cottonwood Canyon
entered into that certain development agreement (the "Development
Agreement'), which expressly exempted the Developer from responsibility for
any new development impact fees. The Development Agreement was amended
by Amendment No. 1 dated January 12, 2010, approved by Ordinance No. 1270
which extends the project's exemption from MSHCP requirements.
Even though the Project is exempt from the MSHCP, the Developer must comply
with other state and federal laws. Consistent with federal law, the applicant had
prepared a project- specific Habitat Conservation Plan and has a history of
extensive coordination with the wildlife agencies. Where approved for
development, the project site has already been graded, cleared, or developed in
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 8 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
PAGE 2 OF 3
accordance with the Project HCP. Given the foregoing, no further action
regarding the MSCHP is required.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of December 2012, by the
following vote:
ATTEST:
Richard J. MacHott
Acting Planning Manager
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)ss.
Rick Morsch, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 9 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
PAGE 3 OF 3
I, Richard J. MacHott, Acting Planning Manager of the City
California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2012 -_ as adopted
Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held o
December 2012, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Richard J. MacHott
Acting Planning Manager
of Lake Elsinore,
by the Planning
n the 18th day of
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 10 of 21
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04
WHEREAS, Pardee Homes has submitted an application for Residential Design
Review No. 2012 -04 identified as "Living Smart" and "Living Smart Meadow Ridge" (the
"Activity "), for the plotting of a single - family residential product within the Canyon Hills
Specific Plan, Planning Area 37, on the south side of Canyon Hills Road, east of
Kalanchoe Road; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of approving Residential Design Review requests for
residential projects within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code §§ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et
seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork
associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary
and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project,
no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements
which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information
are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, the 1989 Final Environmental Impact Report for the Canyon Hills
Specific Plan (SCH #87111606: the "FEIR ") and the 2003 Addendum to FEIR,
collectively, evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build -out
of the specific plan; and
WHEREAS, the Activity comprises part of the whole of the action and does not
present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental
impacts of the project; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Activity has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on December 18, 2012.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 11 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -
PAGE 2 OF 4
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
Residential Design Review plotting of production units for the "Living Smart" and "Living
Smart Meadow Ridge" development and has found them acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04 is
consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Activity
does not present any new information, circumstances, or changes to the project that
was analyzed under the FEIR and the 2003 Addendum to the FEIR. The Activity does
not change density or intensities of use. It simply establishes standards for the design
and plotting of single - family residential home product. Therefore, it is not necessary to
conduct any further environmental review for the Activity.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter
17.184, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of
Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04:
1. The Activity complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan
and the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, as approved.
The General Plan designates the site as "Canyon Hills Specific Plan." The Canyon
Hills Specific Plan designates the sites as `MF -2 Multi- Family Attached Residential
District." Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04, the proposed plotting of approved
production units will collectively lead to the construction of a single- family residential
development that is consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
2. The Activity complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.184.060
and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
The Activity is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that it will
result in the construction of single- family detached units in accordance with
appropriate development and design standards contained in the Canyon Hills
Specific Plan. The Activity creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves
along any street within the subdivision. The Activity also complements the quality of
existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually - pleasing
design and architecture within the area.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.184.070, including guarantees
and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the Activity to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
General Plan, Municipal Code, and Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
The Planning Commission has considered the Activity and finds that with the
attached conditions of approval, the Activity complies with the purposes and
objectives of the General Plan, Municipal Code and Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 12 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
PAGE 3 OF 4
SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves
Residential Design Review 2012 -04.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of December 2012, by the
following vote:
ATTEST:
Richard J. MacHott
Acting Planning Manager
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE )
Rick Morsch, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 13 of 21
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
PAGE 4 OF 4
I, Richard J. MacHott, Acting Planning Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore,
California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2012 -_ as adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of
December 2012, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Richard J. MacHott
Acting Planning Manager
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 14 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04,
LIVING SMART AND MEADOW RIDGE LIVING SMART
CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN
GENERAL
1. The proposed project (Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04) consists of building
designs for 87 single - family detached residential units including a model home complex
and related improvements, for a housing project located within Planning Area 37 of Canyon
Hills Specific Plan (Living Smart).
2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set
aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or
legislative body concerning the project attached hereto.
PLANNING DIVISION
3. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2012 -04, will lapse and be void
unless a building permit is issued within two (2) years of the approval date. An extension of
time, up to one (1) year may be granted by the Community Development Director prior to
the expiration of the initial Design Review approval upon application by the developer and
payment of required fees one (1) month prior to expiration.
4. All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and
requirements contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Municipal Code, prior to
issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities.
5. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval,
those conditions approved with Tract Map No. 36447 and those provisions and
requirements contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Municipal Code, subject to
approval by the Community Development Director or designee.
6. The following architectural details shall be provided:
• All front fence returns will be decorative masonry walls. Wood fences will not be
allowed along the front elevation.
• Additional architectural enhancements and treatments shall be provided for those side
and rear elevations that are within the public view. The applicant shall indicate which
specific side and /or rear elevations will be afforded with enhanced architectural
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 15 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 2 of 6
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — "LIVING SMART"
treatments on future precise grading plans, subject to approval by the Community
Development Director or designee.
7. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches
above any earth surface.
8. Any revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved
by the Community Development Director or designee.
9. Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the
Community Development Director or designee.
10. Provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for
the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash
barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or
designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat
concrete pad and air conditioning units.
11.The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the
entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right -of -way. The applicant
shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit.
12.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance.
Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the
provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim
erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as
approved by the City Engineer.
13. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
14. Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans for the model home complex shall
comply with all American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provision of a
handicapped - accessible bathroom.
15.A cash bond shall be required for the model home complex. This bond is to guarantee
removal of the temporary fencing material, parking lot, etc. that have been placed onsite for
the model home complex. The bond will be released after removal of the materials and the
site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director
or designee.
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 16 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 3 of 6
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — "LIVING SMART"
16.A cash bond of shall be required for any garage conversion of the model(s). Bonds will be
released after removal of all temporary materials and the site is adequately restored,
subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee.
17.A cash bond shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds
will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director or designee.
18.The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to
issuance of building permit.
19.The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District ( EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to
the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards.
20. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards
for fire protection.
21.All mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall be ground mounted. All
outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location
and architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of
the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit.
22.All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic
(manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent landscape coverage using a
combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping /irrigation
plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the
Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be
charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent.
• The applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree List, at a
maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 24 -inch box in size.
• Planting within 15 feet of ingress /egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches.
• The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all
requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use
of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be
used to prevent excessive watering.
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 17 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 4 of 6
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — "LIVING SMART"
• All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance
Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy.
• All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at
the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building.
• One of the proposed lots of the Model Home Complex shall be Xeriscaped and signage
provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping.
• The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and /or plot plan.
• The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details.
23.AII exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within
private lots shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation
installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy.
24. Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception
that wrought -iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
25. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of twenty feet by twenty feet (20' x 20')
of interior clear space to accommodate two vehicles.
26. Comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program that was prepared for the 2003 Addendum
to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR.
27. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community
Development Department for inclusion in the case records.
28.These Conditions of Approval and those conditions approved with Tract Map No. 36447
shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit.
29. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and
construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before
7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday or 8:00am and 5:00pm on
Saturday. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
30. The applicant shall pay all appropriate City fees.
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 18 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 5 of 6
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — "LIVING SMART"
31.The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site
identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that
complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code
Enforcement Division (951) 674 -3124.
32. Construction traffic shall be prohibited from the segment of Lost Road south of the project
site as a construction truck route.
33.The Homeowner's Association shall maintain all project improvements and facilities,
including the private streets, landscaping, park facilities, and drainage improvements.
34. The applicant shall participate in the City's Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL
35. Comply with all conditions of approval of VTTM 36447.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION PREVENTION / NPDES
36. The project shall implement LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the
pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to
lowest priority):
• Preventative measures
• Infiltration
• Harvest and use
• Evapotranspire
• Bio- treatment
• Any portion of design capture volume that is not infiltrated, harvested and used,
evapotranspired, and /or biotreated shall be treated prior to discharge.
37. Project hardscape, roofs and roof drains shall be designed and constructed to provide for
drainage into adjacent landscape.
38. Building, landscape, grading and improvement plans shall contain a table listing Low
Impact Development BMP's.
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 19 of 21
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 6 of 6
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — "LIVING SMART"
39.The property owner (aka Legally Responsible Party) shall execute and cause to be
recorded a WQMP Operations and Management Plan in the form provided by the City prior
to building permit issuance.
FINAL TRACT MAP
40. The final map will be recorded prior to any building permit issuance.
GRADING
41.A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be
submitted for City review and approval for all addition and /or movement of soil (grading) on
the site; a grading permit shall be issued prior to Building Permit.
42.The developer shall obtain all necessary off -site easements and /or permits for off -site
grading and /or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading
permit.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
43. Developer shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and
recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
44.The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Departments requirements and
standards. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County
Fire Department.
Planning Commission
December 18, 2012
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 20 of 21
CITY OF
LADE LSII`iOIJE
DREAM EXTREME-
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
"DRAFT" CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2012 -04 — A REQUEST BY
PARDEE HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF BUILDING DESIGNS
FOR A TOTAL OF 87 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL UNITS, INCLUDING A MODEL HOME COMPLEX
AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS, FOR A HOUSING PROJECT
LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA 37 OF CANYON HILLS
SPECIFIC PLAN (LIVING SMART)
I hereby state that I have read and acknowledge the Draft Conditions of Approval
and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final Conditions that will be
approved by the Planning Commission /City Council. I also understand that all
Conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate
of Occupancy, or as otherwise indicated in the Conditions.
All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first
Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore
Date:
Property Owner's Signature:
Print Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Applicant's Signature:
Print Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
AT THE TIME OF PRINTING THE AGENDA, STAFF HAS NOT
RECEIVED THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM.
PC December 18, 2012 Item No. 4
Page 21 of 21