HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No.SA1BMINUTES
ADJOURNED REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 S. MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE,_CALIFORNIA
TUESDAYr JUNE 15o 1993
## if* t* iiittt#* iiitt *t *t # *itt # *iitit #iitttt * *f tt# *flit * #ttft #t # *f #*
CALL TO ORDER
The Adjourned Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to
order by Chairman Winkler at 3:04 P.M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, DOMINGUEZ, WASHBURN; WINKLER
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CHERVENY
Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal .Counsel
Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Services
Manager Sapp,.. Manager -, of Special_ Projects. Watenpaugh, City
Treasurer Pape and Clerk of.the_Board Kasad.
BUSINESS /DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Award of Contract - San Jacinto River Channel Construction.
Executive Director Molendyk noted, the prior discussions and
recommendations at the Board Meeting on June 8, 1993, and
noted that the. criteria: for ,bidding appears to need
clarification.
Legal Counsel Harper advised that regardless of the position
,taken ,by. the Board on this item, there would be some level of
exposure to litigation.
Sam.Alhadeff, Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon & Rose,, representing
American Contracting, presented a packet of information dated
June 15, 1993, addressed to the Redevelopment Agency Board of
Directors. He discussed the impact�pf disqualification of his
client's bid. He compared the.bid to that of the next low
bidder Hubbs, noting the bidding, with sand bedding versus
filter bedding material. He urged that the Board award the
.contract to American Contracting.
Boardmember Washburn concurred that the criteria needs to be
clarified and-suggested rebidding of the project.-
Boardmember,Alongi asked the Legal Counsel,if there were any
assurances that action would-not incur a lawsuit at a later.
date. He expressed concern that the bidding process was
appropriate and suggested that it may. have not been bid
.properly..
Legal Counsel Harper explained the,logic of the ,,base material
and clarified that even if it was right, depending on the
results, either Hubbs or American would probably pursue
litigation.. He further explained that - the Board has the right
to reject all bids and rebid the project. He stressed that it
would be best to reject all.bids and rebid..
AOEND.; ITEM NO. I ��
PAGE TWO -
AGENCY MINUTES - JUNE IS, 1993
Boardmember Alongi. expressed concern with the analysis that
portions of the bid were too high, rather than reviewing the
bid as a whole.
Legal Counsel Harper commented that there were no findings
necessary to reject all bids; .and it did not involve a
question of whether it was bid correctly or not. He noted
that the most significant issue appears to be the "sand"
bedding issue.
A representative of American Contracting indicated that, it
would not be a fair statement to say that no one else bid in
the same way he had.
Mr. Aldaheff questioned the areas of concern, if use of sand
bedding material is responsive to the bid process. He also
questioned.the logic for starting over.
Public Services Director Tecca indicated that sand bedding was
not the issue. He clarified the original bid and the
addendum. He. further indicated that some were out of balance
by comparison.
Mr. Aldaheff questioned the issues of this rejection and
issues which had not been previously discussed. He suggested
that numerous imbalances could also be found in the other bids
submitted. He requested that his client be given the
opportunity to perform, since they have all necessary bonds
and - insurance in place.
Legal Counsel Harper indicated that Hubbs also had everything
in line and advised that it would be in the City's. best
`interest not to award the contract at this time. He noted for
the record that this action had nothing to do with American
Contracting or their bidding.
Boardmember' Dominguez indicated that he, would accept the
recommendation of Legal Counsel.
MOVED BY DOMINGUEZ, SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE'OF THOSE PRESENT TO REJECT ALL BIDS AND GO OUT FOR RE -BID..
2.
Executive Director Molendyk recommended award of this
contract.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT OF THE SAN JACINTO RIVER CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO
ROBERT BEIN,,WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES /NINYO AND MOORE.
Executive Director Molendyk recommended that the item pertaining to
the outlet channel agreement be added to the Redevelopment Agency
agenda for concurrence since the Redevelopment Agency would be
paying for the related bridges.
MOVED BY WINKLER, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADD THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT .WITH THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD, CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
REGARDING THE LAKE ELSINORE OUTLET CHANNEL: .
AGENDA 1-10-1
: ..1
PI E
a�� 3
PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - JUNE 15,1 1993
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO CONCUR WITH CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON THE
ABOVE ENTITLED COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.
MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY DOMINGUEZ AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
AT 3:24 P.M.
ATTEST:
VICKI KASAD, CLERK OF THE BOARD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JIM WINKLER, CHAIRMAN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA I ?E6.`. NO.
PAGE 3 - OF �