Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-20-2012 NAHCITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2012 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Jordan called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Blake led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Jordan Vice Chairperson O'Neal Commissioner Blake Commissioner Gonzales Commissioner Morsch Absent: None Also present: Planning Manager Morelion, Public Works Director Seumalo, City Attorney Leibold, Planning Consultant Donahoe, Planning Consultant MacHott, and Office Specialist Herrington. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES None. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) 1. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following Minute(s): • March 6, 2012 Motion by Vice Chairperson O'Neal, seconded by Commissioner Morsch, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of March 6, 2012; Motion passed by 5-0 vote. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) 2. Amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, Amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and Adding Chapter 17.86 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 2 of 12 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.134 - CMU Commercial Mixed-Use District Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of the Amendment to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and adding Chapter 17.86 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.134 - CMU Commercial Mixed-Use District. Planning Consultant Donahoe presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Gonzales stated that he is concerned about second hand smoke from the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bar and it should be prohibited for the mixed use. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that in speaking with the City's Building Official, there are regulations for Cigar Lounges and Hookah Bars which are regulated by State Laws and the dissemination of smoke is one of the items that they are prohibited from doing. City Attorney Leibold stated that because it is conditionally permitted, the Commission reviews and approves every facility on a case by case basis, therefore, smoke dissemination might be one of the provisions for denial in the future. Commissioner Morsch requested that a condition be imposed that no smoke leave the airspace of the Cigar Lounge/Hooka Bar and noted that he doesn't think that the use should be denied. He asked what prompted the mixed use action. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the City has Commercial Mixed Use and Residential Mixed Use designations on property throughout the City by way of the General Plan, and this is the first step to implement development in these zones. He also referred to Chapter 17.76.035 Standards for Eating and Drinking Establishments, and with respect to sidewalk cafes, asked Public Works Director Seumalo if this requires an Encroachment Permit. Director Seumalo stated yes. Commissioner Morsch asked if this is something that the City should add to the Municipal Code Section or leave it up to the applicant. Planning Consultant Donahoe referred to Section 17.86.035b. Also, Public Works Director Seumalo and City Attorney Leibold addressed his questions, referring to the Municipal Code. Commissioner Morsch asked for clarification regarding multi- story buildings as far as square footage allowance, referring to RMU Residential Mixed Use Section 17.86.040. Planning Consultant Donahoe suggested adding the word "or" after 2,420 square feet and leave out "consistent with" so the option is "2,420 square feet or 18 dwelling units per acre". Commissioner Morsch agreed to the change. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that she would do the same to Exhibit B as well. Commissioner Morsch discussed the density bonus, and asked who makes the decision regarding qualifying for the density bonus. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained the qualifications and noted that City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 3 of 12 the Planning Commission makes the decision regarding qualifying. She noted that the City wants to encourage these types of project amenities for development to do this. Commissioner Morsch requested more of a guideline regarding the standards for the granting of the density. Planning Manager Morelion suggested leaving it up to staff regarding the recommendation based on their experience with project design and code. He said the review should be done on a case-by-case basis. Commissioner Blake requested clarification of Code Section 17.58 and how that definition addresses 17.86.060 Density Bonus. City Attorney Leibold explained that this section refers to affordable housing based on the depth of affordability and the percentage of the project that is affordable to very low or moderate income households, housing to the elderly or specific projects with childcare facilities, referring to State law. Planning Manager Morelion stated that the mixed use is a new Ordinance, and the thought is to encourage new development and more dense development and try and get the vertical mixed use. He noted that this takes some incentives and staff will try to work it out in the design stage. Staff will do their best to get to that point but it's up to the Commission to agree. City Attorney Leibold stated that there is Legislative discretion in terms of evaluating a project on a case-by-case basis based on those specific circumstances which are established over time. Commissioner Morsch stated that he agrees with the provision for mixed use but is concerned about parking and would like parking structures as an integral part of the development. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that part of the mixed use concept is that the development provides services for the residents who are going to be living there. The RMU is primarily residential and there will be 20 - 30 percent commercial in the project, therefore enabling people to walk to the facilities. If the commercial development is larger and they want to cater to outside sources, then the City requires the parking. Commissioner Morsch referred to Pasadena Old Town and noted that it is a great success for mixed uses and indicated that the City of Lake Elsinore has to anticipate that it will have outsiders coming in and they need a place to park. He requested parking structures. Commissioner Blake stated that regarding the density bonus, he was not sure of 35 vs. 30 dwelling units per acre and didn't know if 35 units are too much because the City of Lake Elsinore is a rural City. He stated that he agrees with Commissioner Gonzales regarding the Cigar Lounge being prohibited in the RMU and suggested keeping it in CMU. He had a question about the Pawn Shop and didn't know whether it was permitted, because it wasn't clear in the Mixed Use Land Use Table. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the Pawn Shop is permitted unless it has gun sales, and in that case would require a CUP. Commissioner Blake stated that he is concerned about an indoor SWAP meet in a CMU, due to fire hazard and health issues, and requested that it require a CUP in the commercial zone so that it is City regulated. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 4 of 12 Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that he does agree that Hookah Bar's second hand smoke is a problem; however, he believes that the CUP process could effectively deal with that. He asked Planning Consultant Donahoe to explain why RMUs and CMUs are a good idea and asked her to discuss Main Street and what the City envisions there. He indicated that the Ballpark would be a great place for RMU/CMU, but since downtown doesn't have live entertainment and very few restaurants; he's not sure how one invents the other and how this would get accomplished. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained why the RMU/CMU is so significant, indicating that we need to decrease our reliance on automobiles; she went on to say that we need to make the living situation work with services that are nearby and are within walking distance, or ride a bike and leave the automobile at home. Part of the Climate Action Plan was to try and implement this and have areas within the City that would enable such development to take place. She noted that the Ballpark District is a perfect example of this kind of use. She explained that the purpose of the downtown's Master Plan was to concentrate population that serve commercial businesses to make them viable, and to provide these businesses to the residents so they have a healthy living environment. Chairperson Jordan asked why the City is allowing a Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bar in RMU but not allowing a Bar/Pub or a Cocktail Lounge in the RMU. City Attorney Leibold stated that it relates to noise level. Bars and Pubs tend to have music, louder patrons, whereas the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bars are a quieter use. She noted that it is up to the Commission to make a recommendation. Chairperson Jordan stated that she feels they should be treated similarly and doesn't want them to be prohibited in RMU. Planning Consultant Donahoe also stated that bars, pubs, and cocktail lounges tend to stay open late and the City would have to regulate the hours of operation in the RMU project. Chairperson Jordan stated that in the definitions, there was Wireless Telecommunications Facility, but didn't have it included in the Table of Mixed Use Land Uses, and asked why it was left out. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that they put definitions in to show that they were specifically omitted but indicated that they didn't want the Telecommunication Poles in the RMU and CMU. Chairperson Jordan referred to page 19 of 40, 17.86.090 Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Reference, and asked staff why they didn't reference any of the Commercial Districts but included the Residential districts. Planning Consultant Donahoe agreed that they should be included. Vice Chairperson O'Neal seconded Chairperson Jordan's comments regarding allowing bars and pubs in mixed use districts and indicated that he doesn't believe in roll up sidewalks in RMU because it's part of the scene and the night life of living in those kinds of areas. Commissioner Gonzales stated that he doesn't want the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bar, and Cocktail Lounges in RMU. Chairperson Jordan didn't agree with taking the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bars out of a RMU and feels that there are appropriate locations for it. There was more discussion between the Commissioners regarding Cigar Lounges/Hookah Bars in the RMUs. Commissioner Morsh stated that he thinks that the mixed use is offering another diverse opportunity for City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 5 of 12 an environment where people can live and indicated that this is not going to be imposed Citywide and if you don't want to live next to a bar then you go into a residential 1 or 2 zoned property. He also asked how you can prevent smoke coming from units below in residential condominium projects. In addition, he also noted that this kind of living is not an imposition, it's an opportunity, and if you're going to build a community, expansion is inevitable. The City should offer diversity that other communities offer such as mixed use. Commissioner Blake stated that he thinks there is a difference between a bar, a pub, and a lounge, as opposed to a restaurant. He would see a restaurant that has a bar, being below an RMU which is very different than the Bar, Pub, Cocktail Lounge that can be in the CMU. He referred to downtown Oceanside, San Diego, which has nice new mixed use and is a good model for the distinction between food establishments with a bar next to it. There is a difference between noise and volume. He stated that he is concerned about the indoor SWAP meet and doesn't think they should be allowed. He has an issue with going to 35 units per acre; he thinks it's too many people. City Attorney Leibold responded to the question regarding the density bonus and explained that in the State's Density Bonus Law, addressing only the Affordable Housing, Senior Housing and Childcare Facilities, the calculation is such that it does mandate that the City provide a maximum of 35% density bonus, if specific conditions are met. City Attorney Leibold suggested summarizing the issues that have been raised, specifically, Cigar Lounges/Hooka Bars, Pubs, and SWAP meets and have a separate motion. If the majority can agree on whatever the motion is then that moves forward as the recommendation to the City Council. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that she reviewed the following changes based upon what the Commission requested and will be part of the Motion. Section 040 of both 17.86 and 17.134, Section A & B and Section A in Commercial; change the way the language is written. Also, in the last Section .090, references to Commercial Sections of the City's existing Code will be added and in the same Section under Commercial, Residential Standards will be added to that. In the Matrix; add the street frontage at 10 feet and the coverage at 50 percent or greater for Commercial and 70 to 80 percent or greater for Residential. Commissioner Blake requested moving the indoor SWAP meet from permitted to a CUP. Chairperson Jordan, Commissioner Gonzales, and Commission Morsch had no objection to this. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that his only objection to requesting a CUP is that it becomes an expensive proposition for people, and asked how the cost is determined. Planning Manager Morelion reviewed the costs that the City charges for CUPs. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that he has no objections to Commissioner Blake's request. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 6 of 12 Motion was made by Chairperson Jordan, seconded by Vice Chairperson O'Neal to include Bar, Pub, and Cocktail Lounge in the RMU as a CUP, and to leave the Cigar Lounge/Hooka Bar as is; Motion passed 3-2. Motion was made by Commissioner Morsch, seconded by Vice Chairperson O'Neal to approve Resolution No. 2012-15, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending approval of the Amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, Amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and adding Chapter 17.86 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.134 - CMU Commercial Mixed- Use District, with the provisions of the previous Motion that the Commission approved, and includes the changes that Planning Consultant Donahoe read into the record; Motion passed 5-0. 3. Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2012-01 - Changing the official zoning map of the City of Lake Elsinore, subject to the completion of Annexation No. 81 (also referred to as the "3rd Street Annexation") bringing approximately 320 acres of land within the City's sphere of influence generally located southwest of State Route 74 (Central Avenue), west of Waterford Street, and northeast of Dexter Avenue and Interstate 15, into the corporate boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve a resolution recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approval of Pre-Annexation Zoning No. 2012-01. Chairperson Jordan left the dais and recused herself from this Item because she lives in close proximity to the area and indicated that Vice Chairperson O'Neal would take over. Planning Consultant MacHott presented the Staff Report. He noted that additionally, staff received a letter from Bruce Eichorn regarding the 3rd Street Annexation which was distributed to the Commission. Although the letter states that it is in regards to the 3rd Street Annexation which includes Mr. Eichorn's property, it does not address the annexation but addresses Wasson Canyon Road. Planning Consultant MacHott stated that Director Seumalo is available to answer any questions regarding the letter. Vice Chairperson O'Neal asked Planning Consultant MacHott about SB244 and whether this complies with its requirements. Planning Consultant MacHott explained SB244 and to applicability to the 3rd Street Annexation. City Attorney Leibold also addressed Vice Chairperson O'Neal's questions regarding S13244. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 7 of 12 REQUESTS TO SPEAK Gary Washburn, resident in Lake Elsinore, stated that he is a land owner in the proposed annexation and is representing a land owner that owns a property in that area as well. He stated that he supports the annexation and explained why. Lonnie Shaw, stated that he lives on 3rd Street and has lived there for more than 35 years and moved there to be in a rural area. He stated that he doesn't support the annexation. He showed the Commission the location of his property and noted that he doesn't agree with the High Density Residential (R-3) being next to the Low Density Residential (R-E). Planning Consultant Donahoe addressed Mr. Shaw's concerns and explained why staff chose to put HDR and MDR (Medium Density Residential) next to LDR in this area. Mr. Shaw stated that the County's General Plan had no high density at all and he also indicated that the annexation was put on hold because of the General Plan. He also stated that he and other residents in the area were not told that the annexation was put on hold and have a mistrust of the City because of this. Curtis Labeda stated that he owns a commercial property on Ohana Circle and noted that 15 years ago he got approved for a CUP through the County of Riverside. He indicated that the current zone is Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) and the City is proposing to turn the designation into Business Professional (BP) which would become a problem for him regarding the way he has his business set up. He explained the use of his business and how it changed due to the economy and requested the Planning Commission reconsider changing the zone. He intended for the business to be a roller skating rink but due to the economy divided the property, one side is manufacturing skate wheels, and the other side is RV repair. He stated that eventually once the economy turns around, he would like to have a skating rink at the location. He requested that the Planning Commission allow the land use designation be changed from BP to Commercial Manufacturing. Vice Chairperson O'Neal explained that it is a pre-existing non-conforming use. Mr. Labeda stated that he wasn't sure what that meant. City Attorney Leibold explained this to him and stated that his existing operations would be allowed to continue but a prior entitlement that has been abandoned for 7 years would not be permitted unless it is permitted by the designation. Mr. Labeda indicated that he spent $400,000 dollars to turn it into an exercise facility or a skating rink and indicated that in order to keep the property; he had to modify the business to survive. He stated that eventually he would like to have a skating rink. Planning Consultant MacHott researched the County of Riverside's database and confirmed County approvals and permitted uses. He reviewed the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility matrix and although the Council cannot change the General Plan designation of BP, offered a modification of the proposed C-O zoning on Mr. Labeda's property to CM zoning which would allow the current uses and the Health Club with CUPs in the City. Mr. Labeda had questions regarding the property's septic system and an easement. Director Seumalo stated that his would be through the County of Riverside. Mr. Labeda also had questions City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 8 of 12 regarding a bill board on the property. Planning Consultant MacHott stated that any signs currently would be through the County of Riverside on-site advertising requirements. Mike Matthews, resident on 3rd Street, stated that he has concerns about the crime, traffic and safety of the residents in the area because the land designation changed from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. He is requesting that the Planning Commission reconsider this small area to change back to Low Density Residential. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained the reasoning behind changing the land use designation. There was discussion between the Commissioners regarding the land use designation in that area. Planning Consultant MacHott reviewed the area's land use designations and also discussed the annexation. He reviewed the Residential zoning that would be consistent with the General Plan and what would be compatible in that area. Commissioner Morsch stated that he understands the concern because it is a zone change and is surprised to see this issue come up now. Mr. Matthews stated that he was just notified of this. Edwardo Hinojosa, stated that he has lived on Allan Street for 30 years, and agrees with Mr. Matthews regarding requesting to change the land designation in this area. Commissioner Blake asked Planning Consultant MacHott to explain the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix to the Commission. City Attorney Leibold discussed the recommendation that the Planning Commission can make to City Council regarding changing the land use designation for both properties to be consistent with the General Plan. Commission Blake suggested Commercial Mixed Use/Medium Density Residential but doesn't like High Density Residential in that area. Commissioner Gonzales stated that he doesn't like that the land use is designated for High Density Residential in that area and suggested Single Family Residential. Commissioner Morsch stated that since there isn't the option of Commercial Office or another use he would like to accommodate the residents that are requesting the change and would like to recommend Single Family Residential zoning and referred to City Attorney Leibold for council regarding this. City Attorney Leibold stated that as long as the City zoning is consistent with the General Plan designation because this is the first incident with imposing zoning, there shouldn't be any issues. Commissioner Morsch asked Director Seumalo what about the impact of the annexation and has there been a cost analysis done. Director Seumalo stated that there hasn't been a cost analysis done and noted that grading will begin once there is development. Commissioner Morsch asked if there are flood control issues at the north part of this area. Director Seumalo stated that there City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 9 of 12 are at least 2 significant drainage courses that come through the area but there are no improvement plans. He indicated that although they are included in the City's area drainage fees for improvements in the area, it is important to keep in mind that adjustments to those fees have been made in at least 15 years so the fees will be significantly less than the cost of the improvements. Commissioner Gonzales asked about drainage problems in the Ramsgate area that flooded some homes about 2 years ago. Director Seumalo stated that there was drainage issues with the apartments adjacent to the Allan Street residence but was addressed by Public Works. Commissioner Gonzales asked about the drainage issues on Highway 74. Director Seumalo stated that part of the drainage issues in the location are related to the realignment of State Route 74 but there are no plans by Cal-Trans to make those adjustments. Commissioner Morsch stated that inevitably, the City's Animal Control Costs are going to go up because of a bigger area and more animals. Also, he stated that he wished that staff would have included in their Staff Report dates of prior meetings so that the Commission would be aware of issues brought up. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that although he would prefer Residential Estate (R-E) zoning, he would support the Single-Family zoning that Mr. Matthews is requesting and noted that he would support what the residents want for their area. Motion was made by Commissioner Gonzales, seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2012-16, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approval of Pre-annexation Zone Change No. 2012-01 subject to completion of the Annexation No. 81 with the following changes; Motion passed 4-0. • Change High Density Residential (R-3) to Single Family Residential (R-1) (3rd Street location) • Change the Medium Density Residential (R-2) along Cambern Avenue to Single-Family Residential (R-1). • Property on Ohana Circle to be changed to Commercial Manufacturing (CM) instead of Commercial Office (CO) zoning. BUSINESS ITEMS 4. General Plan Conformity Determination for Proposed Abandonment of Park Site and Transfer City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 10 of 12 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution determining that the abandonment and transfer of the 4.8 acre park site is in conformity with the City's General Plan. Barbara Leibold, City Attornev Leibold, McClendon & Mann Chairperson Jordan returned to the dias and asked City Attorney Leibold to present the Staff Report. City Attorney Leibold presented the Staff Report. Vice Chairperson Jordan asked how the City makes sure that the 24 acre park doesn't fall through the cracks again. City Attorney Leibold stated that the 24 acre park is designated on a specific plan and City Council is having discussions with McMillin, the project's developer, who will be fully improving the park to a much higher level than would have otherwise been done with the multiple parks. She also indicated that there will be a contractual agreement between the City and the developer. Vice Chairperson O'Neal asked when the 24 acre regional park will be built. City Attorney Leibold stated that the proposal is to build the park in 3 phases. The applicant, Don Mitchell, McMillin Land Development, stated that the park will be completed in 2 years. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that that a few school trustee members were not in favor of any schools in that area and wanted to confirm with City Attorney Leibold that it wouldn't be a problem. City Attorney Leibold stated that there is one board member that is opposed to a school site in the location but staff and the remainder of the board are interested in continuing discussions. Commissioner Morsch asked if the property is relinquished to the School District, will there be a cost. City Attorney Leibold stated that the City will reconvey the property to McMillin which is a private transaction between McMillin and the School District. Commissioner Morsch stated that there are costs of grading, hydro seeding, amenities, etc. and asked if those costs would be transferred to the 24 acre park. Mr. Mitchell explained the costs. Commissioner Morsch asked what the upgrades were to the park. Mr. Mitchell stated that they are proposing a skate park, a dog park, 4 baseball fields (2 that are lit), soccer field, a lit tennis court, 2 half court basket ball courts, restrooms; concession stands, parking lot and an access road off of Malaga, and noted that the skate park alone is $1 million dollars. Commissioner Morsch stated that he doesn't see any problems with conformity to the General Plan. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 11 of 12 Motion was made by Commissioner Gonzales, seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2012-17, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, finding that the abandonment of an undeveloped park site and transfer conforms to the City's General Plan. STAFF COMMENTS Planning Manager Morelion stated that he was asked by the City Clerk to remind Commissioner Blake and Commissioner Morsch that the 700 Forms are due in 2 weeks. He also mentioned that he was unable to attend the March 6d' Planning Commission meeting and the Commission asked if a discussion regarding Historical Structures could be placed on the Agenda. He stated that staff would present to the Commission a list of Historic Structures in the City and will be contacting the Historic Society to speak to the Commission regarding these structures. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Morsch would like to have discussed how a historical building is defined. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that staff needs to define what is a historical building and what the City wants to achieve. Commissioner Blake stated that it was good to hear from the community that lives in the 3rd Street Annexation area appreciates their comments to the Commission. Commissioner Morsch stated that there will be a "Clean Extreme" event across from Storm Stadium along Diamond Drive on Saturday March 10th at 8:00 a.m. and encouraged everyone to participate. Director Seumalo stated that the City's contact for this event is Justin Carlson, and he will be available for on-site registration. Also, Lambs Fellowship will be on-site and available for registration. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that he thought Bob Brady was able and capable of the position of City Manager and always tried to work in the consensus of 5 City Council Members. He also stated that Mr. Brady always addressed his concerns and appreciated that. Chairperson Jordan stated that she was surprised and disappointed to hear about Bob Brady and noted that it's a lost to the City. CITY ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS None. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 12 of 12 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairperson Jordan adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore will be held on Tuesday, April 3, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. , A (r?-QL Shelly Jordan ` I/ I Chairperson Attest: Warren Morelion Planning Manager