Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1aCITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2012 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Jordan called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Blake led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Jordan Vice Chairperson O'Neal Commissioner Blake Commissioner Gonzales Commissioner Morsch Absent: None Also present: Planning Manager Attorney Leibold, Planning Cons and Office Specialist Herrington. None. 1. Ampt&al of Plann'iho Commission Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following Minute(s): • March 6, 2012 rector Seumalo, City Consultant MacHott, Motion by Vice Chairperson O'Neal, seconded by Commissioner Morsch, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of March 6, 2012; Motion passed by 5-0 vote. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) 2. Amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, Amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and Adding Chapter 17.86 PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 1 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 2 of 12 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.134 - CMU Commercial Mixed-Use District Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of the Amendment to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and adding Chapter 17.86 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.1341"" CMU Commercial Mixed-Use District. Planning Consultant Donahoe presented the Staff Commissioner Gonzales stated that he is conc%rhbd `about skc 'R,i hand smoke from the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Baran d it should be prohibited for'the mixed use. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated t, -,"in"s ea I, with the City's Building Official, there are regulations for Cigar Lounges and "'Hookah Bars which are regulated by State Laws and the dissemination of smoke is one of the items that they are prohibited from doing ~i Attorney Leib stated that because it is conditionally permitted, the Commis ion reviews an Rues every facility on a case by case basis, therefore, smoke dtsseminatio might be one of the provisions for denial in the future. Commissioner MorsC"er/q-"*~p'~ ted that a. condition be imposed that no smoke leave the airspapo bf the C ar Lounge/Hooka Bar and noted that he doesn't think that the use should be;`denied. He ;asked what prompted the mixed use action Planninq Congdlfa lf Donahoe stated that the City has Commercial Mixed Use and FtesidetfiaJ Mix VU) se des"fgnations on property throughout the City by way of li'e Gene ; fin, a E this is the first step to implement development in these zones He alfernidill 0-~Chapter 17.76.035 Standards for Eating and Dunking Etablishment~ end with respect to sidewalk cafes, asked Public Works Director Seumalo if this %fequires an Encroachment Permit. Director Seumalo stated S. Commissioner Morsch asked if this is something that the City should add to the Municipal Code Section or leave it up to the applicant. Planning Consultant Donal 66, ,'i ferred to Section 17.86.035b. Also, Public Works Director Seumalo and City `Attorney Leibold addressed his questions, referring to the Municipal Code. Commissioner Morsch asked for clarification regarding multi- story buildings as far as square footage allowance, referring to RMU Residential Mixed Use Section 17.86.040. Planning Consultant Donahoe suggested adding the word "or' after 2,420 square feet and leave out "consistent with" so the option is "2,420 square feet or 18 dwelling units per acre". Commissioner Morsch agreed to the change. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that she would do the same to Exhibit B as well. Commissioner Morsch discussed the density bonus, and asked who makes the decision regarding qualifying for the density bonus. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained the qualifications and noted that the Planning Commission makes the decision regarding qualifying. She noted PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 2 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 3 of 12 that the City wants to encourage these types of project amenities for development to do this. Commissioner Morsch requested more of a guideline regarding the standards for the granting of the density. Planning Manager Morelion suggested leaving it up to staff regarding the recommendation based on their experience with project design and code. He said the review should be done on a case-by-case basis. Commissioner Blake requested clarification of Code Section 17.58 and how that definition addresses 17.86.060 Density Bonus. City Attorney Leibold explained that this section refers to affordable housing based on the depth of affordability and the percentage of the project that is affordable to low or moderate income households, housing to the elderly or spec11 'r jests with childcare facilities, referring to State law. Planning Manager Morel'on stated that the mixed use is a new Ordinance, and the thought is to encotfage new development and more dense development and try and get the vertical; mixetl use. He noted that this takes some incentives and staff will try,too vvoJrk it out in`'the design stage. Staff will do their best to get to that point but"it's up to the Commission to agree. City Attorney Leibold stated that there` i~ Leglsla ve discretion *,jn~l"`terms of evaluating a project on a case-by case asis '[lased on those specific circumstances which are established over time\ Commissioner Morsch stated that he ac is concerned about parking and woQId'l of the development Planning Consulta use concept is that the development ph going to be living there Tile RMU is p 30 percent com,J6 I in they project, i facilities. If the corr> rclal developm outside sources, thentte °,requirf ~~o~ referred tonOW Olds own and`ri uses agod" indicatetl tF~at the`Cit~,of Lake outsidcoming in and they need a rees with the p vision for mixed use but ik = struc~ Yes as an integral part nt ~ona(IR~ fated that part of the mixed uses ser~!~ces for the residents who are marily residential and there will be 20 - herefore enabling people to walk to the ent is~ larger and they want to cater to ~s, the parking. Commissioner Morsch iced that it is a great success for mixed Elsinore has to anticipate that it will have place to park. He requested parking Commissioner,, Blake staY~d that regarding the density bonus, he was not sure of 35 vs. 30 dweliiri uni€s per acre and didn't know if 35 units are too much because the City'~ofake Elsinore is a rural City. He stated that he agrees with Commissioner Govt ales regarding the Cigar Lounge being prohibited in the RMU and suggested keeping it in CMU. He had a question about the Pawn Shop and didn't know whether it was permitted, because it wasn't clear in the Mixed Use Land Use Table. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the Pawn Shop is permitted unless it has gun sales, and in that case would require a CUP. Commissioner Blake stated that he is concerned about an indoor SWAP meet in a CMU, due to fire hazard and health issues, and requested that it require a CUP in the commercial zone so that it is City regulated. Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that he does agree that Hookah Bar's second hand smoke is a problem; however, he believes that the CUP process could effectively PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 3 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 4 of 12 deal with that. He asked Planning Consultant Donahoe to explain why RMUs and CMUs are a good idea and asked her to discuss Main Street and what the City envisions there. He indicated that the Ballpark would be a great place for RMU/CMU, but since downtown doesn't have live entertainment and very few restaurants; he's not sure how one invents the other and how this would get accomplished. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained why the RMU/CMU is so significant, indicating that we need to decrease our reliance on automobiles; she went on to say that we need to make the living situation work with services that are nearby and are within walking distance, or ride a bike and leave the automobile at home. Part of the Climate Action Plan was to try and implement this and have areas within the City that would enable su%v;;o velopment to take place. She noted that the Ballpark District is a perfect2anfple of this kind of use. She explained that the purpose of the downt~n Master Plan was to concentrate population that serve commercial buslnessesl,,,~,~,, ake them viable, and to provide these businesses to the reside so they v±~ a healthy living environment. Chairperson Jordan asked why the City i§'allowing 4 Cigar Lounge/ okah Bar in RMU but not allowing agar/Pub or a Coektal, l 'dbnge in the%RMU. City Attorney Leibold stated that it relates to noise I~~~Bars and Pubs tend to have music, louder patrons, whereas the.Cigar Lounge/ cokah Bars are a quieter use. She noted that it is up to the ,Cornnmission to a recommendation. Chairperson Jordan stated that she ,,1661191,11,%e. should be treated similarly and doesn't want them to be prohibited in~EtMUti:Planning_Consultant Donahoe also stated that bars, pubs and,,cocktail lobl~gs tendo "stay open late and the City would have to regulate the/, ours of oP~ ation in ttie RMU project. Chairperson ~gZ5, Jordan stated that' Ip the d~ initions, there was Wireless Telecommunications Facility, but did" t Gave it Included in the`~7able of Mixed Use Land Uses, and asked why it was left°ot5t Ih~~sultant Donahoe stated that they put definifions:In fo;show thay were specifically omitted but indicated that they didn't want the Tel'' m lion Poles in the RMU and CMU. Chairperson a ter, Jordan referred to pa 19 of 40, 17.86.090 Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Reference,?, and aske ff why they didn't reference any of the Commercial Districts but ilncluded tl~e Residential districts. Planning Consultant Donahoe agreed that they should` be included. Vice Chairperson O'Neal seconded Chairperson Jo daq's comments regarding allowing bars and pubs in mixed use districts and Indicated that he doesn't believe in roll up sidewalks in RMU because it's part ofthe scene and the night life of living in those kinds of areas Commissioner Gonzales stated that he doesn't want the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bar, and Cocktail Lounges in RMU. Chairperson Jordan didn't agree with taking the Cigar Lounge/Hookah Bars out of a RMU and feels that there are appropriate locations for it. There was more discussion between the Commissioners regarding Cigar Lounges/Hookah Bars in the RMUs. Commissioner Morsh stated that he thinks that the mixed use is offering another diverse opportunity for an environment where people can live and indicated that this is not going to be imposed Citywide and if you don't want to live next to a bar then you go into a residential 1 or 2 zoned property. He also asked how you can prevent smoke PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 4 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 5 of 12 coming from units below in residential condominium projects. In addition, he also noted that this kind of living is not an imposition, it's an opportunity, and if you're going to build a community, expansion is inevitable. The City should offer diversity that other communities offer such as mixed use. Commissioner Blake stated that he thinks there is a difference between a bar, a pub, and a lounge, as opposed to a restaurant. He would see a restaurant that has a bar, being below an RMU which is very different than the Bar, Pub, Cocktail Lounge that can be in the CMU. He referred to downtown Oceanside, San Diego, which has nice new mixed use and is a good model for the distinction between food establishments with a bar next to it. There is a, difference between noise and volume. He stated that he is concerned abo ttie h oor SWAP meet and doesn't think they should be allowed. He has In;," SSUE with going to 35 units per acre; he thinks it's too many people. City Attorney Led responded to the question regarding the density bonus and explainetl that in State's Density Bonus Law, addressing only the Affordable "ousing, Senlr Housing and Childcare Facilities, the calculation is such"chat it does mandate that the City provide a maximum of 35% density bonus, iT ~Recific ~nditions are met:` City Attorney Leibold suggested summarizing the,i that have been raised, ,sues specifically, Cigar Lounges/Hooka Bars, Pubs an~~SWAP meets and have a separate motion. If the majority cast agree on whatever the motion is then that moves forward as the recommendatrbn to tk1e..City Council;- Planning Consultant Donahoe stated tAgt'she rbVv10wed the following changes based upon what theomrlasion requested and will be part of the Motion. Section 040 of both 7 86~and 17.134, E ection A & B and Section A in Commercial change the yEthe language is written. Also, in the last Section ,eg .090, refgfences o Com" erclal '86 ions of the City's existing Code will be added and in the same Secti§gunder Commercial, Residential Standards will be added to,that. In the Matrix, add he street frontage at 10 feet and the coverage at 50 pc *t or greater for mercial and 70 to 80 percent or greater for CommissionerBj~he requested moving the indoor SWAP meet from permitted to a CUP. Chairperson Jordan, Commissioner Gonzales, and Commission Morsch had no objection to this. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that his only objection to requesting a CUP is that it becomes an expensive proposition for people, and asked how the cost is determined. Planning Manager Morelion reviewed the costs that the City charges for CUPs. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that he has no objections to Commissioner Blake's request. Motion was made by Chairperson Jordan, seconded by Vice Chairperson O'Neal to include Bar, Pub, and Cocktail Lounge in the RMU as a CUP, and to leave the Cigar Lounge/Hooka Bar as is; Motion passed 3-2. Motion was made by Commissioner Morsch, seconded by Vice Chairperson O'Neal to approve Resolution No. 2012-15, a Resolution of the Planning PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 5 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 6 of 12 Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending approval of the Amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning, Amending Chapter 17.08 - Definitions, and adding Chapter 17.86 - RMU Residential Mixed-Use District and Chapter 17.134 - CMU Commercial Mixed- Use District, with the provisions of the previous Motion that the Commission approved, and includes the changes that Planning Consultant Donahoe read into the record; Motion passed 5-0. 3. Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2012-01 - Changing the official zoning map of the City of Lake Elsinore, subject to the completion of Annexation No. 81 (also referred to as the °3rd Street v exation") bringing approximately 320 acres of land within the Ct,,g sphere of influence generally located southwest of State Route 74 (Central Avenue), west of Waterford Street, and northeast of Dexter A~!enue and Interstate 15, into Sal I the corporate boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Approve a resolution recommending to the Elsinore approval of Pre-Anti `k,atign Zoning Chairperson Jordan left the dais and lives in close proximity toy he area would take over. the folldwinq action: ncil of the City of Lake 201. fm this Item because she Vice Chairperson O'Neal Planning Consultant MacH~ presented 'fte Staff Report. He noted that additionally, staff recelveda~lett"9/pBruce Eichorn regarding the 3`d Street Annexatio/p"-whlch.,was distributed to he'Commission. Although the letter states that It,JS"in regards to the'Street Annexation which includes Mr. Eichorn's property,., it does not ad~dress , annexation but addresses Wasson Canyon Road Punning Consul" t MEIdHott stated that Director Seumalo is available to answer an"v dwestions rec ardinq the letter. Vice ChairpersorI1I 'Ne I asked Planning Consultant MacHott about SB244 and whether this compl es with its requirements. Planning Consultant MacHott explained SB244 and to applicability to the 3`d Street Annexation. City Attorney Leibold also addressed Vice Chairperson O'Neal's questions regarding SB244. REQUESTS TO SPEAK Gary Washburn, resident in Lake Elsinore, stated that he is a land owner in the proposed annexation and is representing a land owner that owns a property in that area as well. He stated that he supports the annexation and explained why. Lonnie Shaw, stated that he lives on 3`d Street and has lived there for more than 35 years and moved there to be in a rural area. He stated that he doesn't PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 6 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 7 of 12 support the annexation. He showed the Commission the location of his property and noted that he doesn't agree with the High Density Residential (R-3) being next to the Low Density Residential (R-E). Planning Consultant Donahoe addressed Mr. Shaw's concerns and explained why staff chose to put HDR and MDR (Medium Density Residential) next to LDR in this area. Mr. Shaw stated that the County's General Plan had no high density at all and he also indicated that the annexation was put on hold because of the General Plan. He also stated that he and other residents in the area were not told that the annexation was put on hold and have a mistrust of the City because of this. Curtis Labeda stated that he owns a commercial proper, 0,p Ohana Circle and noted that 15 years ago he got approved for a CU rough the County of Riverside. He indicated that the current zones° Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) and the City is proposing to' turn%he designation into Business Professional (BP) which would becomea problem'fp jim regarding the way he has his business set up. He explained the rise of his bsp ss and how it changed due to the economy and requested the Plannin y~ommission reconsider changing the zone. He intendedMthe business to be a ruler skating rink but due to the economy divided the p~~ erty, ,,'one side is manufacturing skate wheels, and the other side is RV repair. H` k ated that eventually once the economy turns around, he would likg to have a skating rink at the location. He requested that the Planning Com nlsslen allow ttie land,,use designation be changed from BP to Commercial'~~ilanu sgturing. Vi, Chairperson O'Neal explained that it is a pre-existing none pnforCing w e. ,Mr. Labeda stated that he wasn't sure what tha ,mp w fit. City A giro y Leib IT, explained this to him and stated that his extIng o`p~~ tions would be allowed to continue but a prior ~i entitlement that h j11 een atYa doned for 7tiyears would not be permitted unless it is permitted by fhe deegnation Mr. LLab d6 indicated that he spent $400,000 dollars to turn it into an„exercise facility or a skating rink and indicated that in order to keep fh✓e'proper ftl, e had tb"modify the business to survive. He stated that eventually he uuOUld 'llkey~to have a skating rink. Planning Consultant MacHot~.researched the Coun~!f Riverside's database and confirmed County approve,and permitted uses. He reviewed the General Plan/Zoning Compatibtlity°matrix and.although the Council cannot change the General Plan designation of BP, offered a modification of the proposed C-O zoning on Mr. Labeda's propertyjo ,CM zoning which would allow the current uses and the Health Club with ",CUPs in the City. Mr. Labeda had questions regarding the property's septic system and an easement. Director Seumalo stated that his would be through the County of Riverside. Mr. Labeda also had questions regarding a bill board on the property. Planning Consultant MacHott stated that any signs currently would be through the County of Riverside on-site advertising requirements. Mike Matthews, resident on 3rd Street, stated that he has concerns about the crime, traffic and safety of the residents in the area because the land designation changed from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. He is requesting that the Planning Commission reconsider this small area to change back to Low Density Residential. Planning Consultant Donahoe explained the PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 7 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 8 of 12 reasoning behind changing the land use designation. There was discussion between the Commissioners regarding the land use designation in that area. Planning Consultant MacHott reviewed the area's land use designations and also discussed the annexation. He reviewed the Residential zoning that would be consistent with the General Plan and what would be compatible in that area. Commissioner Morsch stated that he understands the concern because it is a zone change and is surprised to see this issue come up now. Mr. Matthews stated that he was just notified of this. Edwardo Hinojosa, stated that he has lived on Allan Street for 30 years, and agrees with Mr. Matthews regarding requesting to change the,land designation in this area. Commissioner Blake asked Planning Consultarff Met,Hott to explain the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix to the Commission City Attorney Leibold discussed the recommendation that ht 'P" b Planning Corfirnission can make to City Council regarding changing the lane designation for both properties to be consistent with the General Plan. Corn sion Blake suggested, ~mmercial Mixed Use/Medium Density Residential but doesn t ,,,06 "High DensitResidential in that area. Commissioner Gonzales stated lkm doesn't IiW that the land use is designated for High Density Reside tai hN1hpt area and suggested Single Family Residential. Commissioner Morse" h stated that since there isn't the option of Commercial Office or anotherk~se he w>/quld like to accommodate the residents that are requesting the change,and would like to r commend Single Family Residential zoning and referred to, aiib Id for council regarding this. City r Attorney Leibold s„fated as long ~s the City zoning is consistent with the General?Plan designation b~ay~se this is the first incident with imposing zoning, there,' shouldn't be anu;issues Commissi®rfb Morsch asked Director Seumalo what about the impact of the annexation and;has there been a cost analysis done. Director Seumalo stated that there hasp t beer) a cost analysis done and noted that grading will begin once there is development. Commissioner Morsch asked if there are flood control issues at th`e north part of this area. Director Seumalo stated that there are at least 2 significant drainage courses that come through the area but there are no improvement plans. He indicated that although they are included in the City's area drainage fees for improvements in the area, it is important to keep in mind that adjustments to those fees have been made in at least 15 years so the fees will be significantly less than the cost of the improvements. Commissioner Gonzales asked about drainage problems in the Ramsgate area that flooded some homes about 2 years ago. Director Seumalo stated that there was drainage issues with the apartments adjacent to the Allan Street residence but was addressed by Public Works. Commissioner Gonzales asked about the PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 8 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 9 of 12 drainage issues on Highway 74. Director Seumalo stated that part of the drainage issues in the location are related to the realignment of State Route 74 but there are no plans by Cal-Trans to make those adjustments. Commissioner Morsch stated that inevitably, the City's Animal Control Costs are going to go up because of a bigger area and more animals. Also, he stated that he wished that staff would have included in their Staff Report dates of prior meetings so that the Commission would be aware of issues brought up. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that although he would prefer Residential Estate (R-E) zoning, he would support the Single-Family zoningthat Mr. Matthews is requesting and noted that he would support what they 'sidents want for their area. Motion was made by Commissioner Gi Blake to approve Resolution No. 201: Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, Council of the City of Lake Elsinore app'1 No. 2012-01 subject to completion of the changes; Motion passed 4-0. • Change High Del Family Residential Medium 's, secondedy Commissioner a~^^Resolutlon ' #'q the Planning brniq, recommendirJg„to,the City of Pr,e-annexation Zoe Change xatdn "No. 81 with the following Single (R-2) along Residential ircle to be changed to uring (CM) instead of zoning. 4. It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution determining that the abandonment and transfer of the 4.8 acre park site is in conformity with the City's General Plan. Barbara Leibold, City Attorney Leibold, McClendon & Mann PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 9 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 10 of 12 Chairperson Jordan returned to the dias and asked City Attorney Leibold to present the Staff Report. City Attorney Leibold presented the Staff Report. Vice Chairperson Jordan asked how the City makes sure that the 24 acre park doesn't fall through the cracks again. City Attorney Leibold stated that the 24 acre park is designated on a specific plan and City Council is having discussions with McMillin, the project's developer, who will be fully improving the park to a much higher level than would have otherwise been done with the multiple parks. She also indicated that there will be a contractual agree/~~t between the City and the developer.y Vice Chairperson O'Neal asked when the 24 acre refona1l k will be built. City Attorney Leibold stated that the proposal is to b tt`iv park 1' phases. The applicant, Don Mitchell, McMillin Land Develo~~stated thaf't Park will be completed in 2 years. Ad Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that that a fed" r~l~i (&Vustee members were not in favor of any schools in that area and wante~~ confirm with City Attorney Leibold that it wouldn't be a problem City Attom Weibold stated that there is one board member that is opposedwto a school site~'ne,location but staff and the remainder of the board are interested h(t nuing scussions. Commissioner will there be a property to Mc School District. hydro seeding, the 24 acre?pr, what the upgrai skate park, a dog PE court, 2alf court b< and an ages road million dollars' FCom with conformity`tg the s.Ked if the property is relinquished to the School District, y Attorney Leibold stated bat the City will reconvey the ich1 a private transaction between McMillin and the ssiowr Morsch stated that there are costs of grading, k /~P O..p shy {c%~j/if those costs would be transferred to f)~ explainer~he costs. Commissioner Morsch asked to th'eY~ark. Mr. Mitchell stated that they are proposing a 4 baseball'flelds (2 that are lit), soccer field, a lit tennis ball eourts, restrooms; concession stands, parking lot f Malaga, and noted that the skate park alone is $1 sfoner Morsch stated that he doesn't see any problems meral Plan. Motion was madeF/by Commissioner Gonzales, seconded by Commissioner Blake to approve Resolution No. 2012-17, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, finding that the abandonment of an undeveloped park site and transfer conforms to the City's General Plan. STAFF COMMENTS Planning Manager Morelion stated that he was asked by the City Clerk to remind Commissioner Blake and Commissioner Morsch that the 700 Forms are due in 2 weeks. He also mentioned that he was unable to attend the March 6th Planning PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 10 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 11 of 12 Commission meeting and the Commission asked if a discussion regarding Historical Structures could be placed on the Agenda. He stated that staff would present to the Commission a list of Historic Structures in the City and will be contacting the Historic Society to speak to the Commission regarding these structures. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Morsch would like to have discussed how a historical building is defined. Vice Chairperson O'Neal stated that staff needs to dune what is a historical building and what the City wants to achieve. Commissioner Blake stated that it was good ear from"Ve community that hN lives in the Td Street Annexation area apple " tes their 'comments to the Commission. Commissioner Morsch stated that there will b Cl'eafv Extreme".e'vent across from Storm Stadium along Diamond Drive: on Satuday March 10th at 8:00 a.m. and encouraged everyone to part)'ei~te Director Smalo stated that the City's contact for this event is Justin Cr~s`c~n, and he wtll,~bg ..available for on-site registration. Also, Lambs Fellowship Wlli be ion,-site and`vailable for registration. Vice Chairperson O' of the position of Q City Council Tok, concerns and aoorel, B None. that he thought Boh:Brady was able and capable and always tried 6 work in the consensus of 5 >o stated hat Mr. Brady always addressed his te~w'as surprised and disappointed to hear a lost to the City. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairperson Jordan adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore will be held on Tuesday, April 3, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Shelly Jordan Chairperson PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 11 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2012 Page 12 of 12 Attest: Warren Morelion Planning Manager PC May 1, 2012 Item No. 1a Page 12 of 12