HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 1CITY OF
LADE
LSMORE
DREAM EXTREME
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
FROM
DATE:
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TOM WEINER
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FEBRUARY 16, 2010
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTE(S)
Discussion
The following Planning Commission minute(s) are submitted for approval:
Recommendation:
(a) Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
January 19, 2010
Recommendation
Approve the Minutes as submitted.
Prepared by: Jessica Guzman
Office Specialist
Approved by: Tom Weiner
Director of Community Development
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 1 of 12
ITAIIa1y
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19.2010
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Flores called the meeting to order at 6:05
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice -Chair Gonzales led the Pledge of
ROLL CALL
CHAIRMAN FLORES
VICE - CHAIRMAN GON
COMMISSIONER MEN
COMMISSIONER O'NE
nity Development Weiner, Deputy City Attorney
;ity Engineer Seumalo, Police Chief Cleary,
Manager Chipman, RDA Analyst Carlson, and
1. Approval of Planning Minutes
Recommendation: Approve the following Minute(s):
a. December 15, 2009 Regular Planning Commission Minutes
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 2 of 12
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S)
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
MOTION was made by Commissioner O'Neal and seconded by Commissioner
Zanelli to approve the December 15, 2009 Regular Planning Commission Minutes.
AYES: CHAIRMAN FLORES
VICE - CHAIRMAN GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
COMMISSIONER ZANELLI
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S)
RAI
32250 Mission Trail, Lake Elsinore.
Recommendation: Direct staff as
Chairman Flores opened the Public
Due to conflict of in
Chairman Flores a,E
Director of Communi
/��,
Use Perini { %t� o�� „�OE
different actions is r
to, March 20, 2007:`”
Decer ber 15, 2009
2009 HWstated there
Chairman Fbresrequ
Michel Knight op ab
the Planning Commis:
himself at 6:06 p.m.
request and;asked for the reading of the staff report.
/ Development � / , leer provided an overview of Conditional
09 He state4e staff report contains a time -line of the
by the Planning Commission and the City Council dating back
le notes] item came before the Planning Commission on
91 six-P// review and a previous CUP approval in June
several options the Planning Commission may consider.
the applicant to approach the podium.
of Trevi Entertainment Center introduced himself to
Chairman Flores requested any speakers to address the Commission that is in favor
of the project.
Daryl Hickman, resident of Lake Elsinore spoke in favor of the project. He noted his
concerns for the economy and noted Trevi Entertainment puts thousands of dollars
into the City's General Fund. He noted the numerous police service calls that were
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 3 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
reported and pointed out that Target and Wal -mart have more service calls than
Trevi. He stated the issues with Trevi Entertainment has been going on too long and
would like to see them resolved.
Chairman Flores asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of the project.
There being no further requests to speak, Chairman Flores asked if anyone wished
to speak against the project.
Office Specialist Porche advised Chairman Flores of a lettegof opposition that was
received by Danielle Rice which was read into the record.
Chairman Flores closed the Public Hearing at 6:15 pyn and brought the discussion
back to the dais for Commissioner's comments. %%
Commissioner Mendoza agreed with Daryl ,H'rckrrian's comments that something
needs to be resolved. He stated he was glad that h out t-, —
erences in
calls however pointed out that Wal- marts ogel hours a day, 7 days aweek. He
stated there is spirit of the law and letter of tai f ar tl J Planning "Commission
has granted him spirit of the law for three years „He stated he used to be one of
Trevi's biggest fans but it seems .though Trevi al" ways comes back with something
else going on. Every time he g'6"M'1 up to speak to "the planning Commission, he
- , ,a
shows not one ounce of remorse at lames everyone end everything that goes
wrong with the project. He wished these issues would "have been resolved six-
4
months ago, but unfortunately it hasn �� ,
Commissioner ONeal expressed to fRe audience that he runs an insurance
company and is fetlllar wit' riisk manageinent�. He noted it is the responsibility of an
insurance company to Inspect the premises: He stated he has made numerous
visits to Trevi and ha not be heard outside. He stated he has
a pro�nwit�ie „ corrip1I is of the noise. He stated there have been times when
Mr�lght has not c9�nplled init h the requirements and stated he has stressed to the
Cnd staff that� should be "'fined for the violations, which do not warrant
revocation of the e regoested the Deputy City Attorney to explain what the
CUP do s4or the land aria landowner.
Deputy City Attorney 0,bterswyk stated if a property owner filed an application for a
CUP, from the time ahe application is filed until the time the final approving body
either approves or denies the CUP the property owner is deemed to have a small
interest in the CUP. Once the CUP has been approved the interest becomes
significant. Property owners have what is known as a vested right. In order for the
City to be justified in taking action adverse to that vested right, the City must act
reasonably and must act in accordance with the standards that are set forth in the
City's Municipal Code. She stated the government code does not establish a set of
criteria by which a city must evaluate a CUP or the possibility of revocation of the
CUP. Instead, the government code leaves the policy making and regulation up to
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 4 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
the City to establish, which is how we look to our Municipal Code for the standards
that we use in evaluating CUP's for both issuance and or suspension.
Commissioner O'Neal asked if a number of constitutional rights go along with the
CUP, such as equal protection.
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk replied by saying perhaps, it depends on the facts
and circumstances of each particular case.
Commissioner O'Neal stated that based on his experienceas a risk management
individual, he doesn't see the problems that others see and doesn't believe that the
number or violations that are presented arise to having the CUP revoked or
suspended. �4,
Commissioner Zanelli pointed out there has beef�k-afiiree -year history of continued
violations regarding the building and fire codes He stated the City'has made many
efforts to work with the applicant and yet /h,,�has continued to decldev ,pat the City's
codes do not matter to him. He stated he does not w�at to risk having omeone die
because of a locked door and because of that he °din no long e support the
operation in the way it is being conducted.
Chairman Flores asked Director community Develmp ent Weiner if the stage MY
area includes dancing and live entertam`raent�%
Director of Community DevelopmentVei_er replied by saying the sports bar area
includes dancing ar��tve entertainmen�Jhich was included in the CUP.
Chairman Flor ssf�� quested #Fie applicant tp,approach the podium.
Michel Kni addressed hid concerns to Commissioner Zanelli including the CUP
was ���ri years 61 nd not three years as mentioned and feels that he
(Cora ussioner Za,'gel I hasp eady made up his mind regardless of what he said.
�i
He 1q rated out to h?' omrifr lori't at he was required to have sprinkler systems
yet th' ity s Cultural�� enter dies not. He advised the Commission of the area that
was loN, at his facil, 0was a storage area and contained only storage materials.
He asked a series lquestions to Chairman Flores. Deputy City Attorney
Winterswyk answered, i his behalf. They areas follows;
Michel Knight asked if Chairman Flores is chairman of the committee and a public
official within the' eaning of the rules.
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk replied by saying, if you are referring to the
Political Reform Act and the regulations that apply to the Political Reform Act then
the answer is "yes."
Michel Knight asked if Chairman Flores is participating, making or influencing a
government decision.
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 5 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk replied by saying, if you are referring to the
Political Reform Act and the regulations that apply to the Political Reform Act then
the answer is "yes."
Michel Knight asked what are Chairman Flores's economical interests and the
possible financial conflicts of interest with the applicant, such as a business
investment, real property or sources of income.
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk replied by saying he h , ad�ffi nancial sources of
income from the applicant.
Michel Knight stated that Chairman Flores has in es in the City one of
which is known as Las Palmas Restaurant. He a ed the same DJ that plays there
at the restaurant also plays at Trevi. He asked- fr cd'pies of the CUPJor Las Palmas
live entertainment and was told there wa� one, issued. He stated ,chairman
Flores has a conflict of interest because h"e a.direct eomoetitor.
Chairman Flores asked Mr. Knight if he was including restaurants along Main Street
that play music, or was he just singled out.
Michel Knight replied by saying thou
the entertainment of newspapers a
spoke of Chairman Flores busir
improvements at tl� / W,almas II
business. He %noted California
discusses flnanie j, terest I a gov(
to recuse himself.
coming up. He at ted he is tired of being
Is being eery stratghttorward about it. He
property rtd how he has conducted
�staurant w rch is only two- blocks from his
)vernment Codes Sections 87100 which
neat official and requested Chairman Flores
L
Winterswyk to speak on his behalf.
4g�ty City Attorney UVinterswy;;responded to Michel Knight's reading of California
GoverVent Code Section 109U the conflicts of interest which arise as a
result ofcontract that :'a public body enters into where the public official has an
interest it contract that is entered into. She stated Section 1090 does not apply
to this cas %b ore the Commission because the Commission is not considering
entering into a'/ tr t with Mr. Knight or with Trevi Entertainment. The item that is
before the Comrssion is a CUP which is a license to operate a business and not a
contract within the meaning of Section 1090. She stated she spoke with Chairman
Flores before the meeting about any potential conflict of interest and concluded that
there is no financial conflict of interest that would require Chairman Flores to either
disclose the interest or to disqualify him from consideration of the item before the
Commission. The way that Mr. Knight has categorized conflicts of interest is not
entirely accurate. Conflicts of Interest do not arise as a result of business
competition or business conflict. Conflicts of Interest arise based on business
investments, as a result of income, results of gifts, or results of real property
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 6 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
interests, of which none of those interests are at issue here. She stated the closest
factual situation which could possibly have lead to some question about a conflict of
interest was the notion of a birthday party that was held at Las Palmas Restaurant
and it was determined that it was not an interest that rose to the level of a conflict of
interest. She stated, based on the discussion with the City Attorney's office
Chairman Flores will not recuse himself.
Michel Knight stated that he hopes that Chairman Flores received correct advice
because he stated he has four conflicts of interest and his attorney would proceed
with the matter and asked him again to recuse himself.
Chairman Flores replied by saying, "No sir, I'm not."
Michel Knight advised the Commission that he wofild like to sh%! a video of a recent
birthday party held at Las Palmas Restaurant which is currently shown on
Youtube.com.
Commissioner Mendoza asked Deputy City Af *,pey,Winterswyk if this Nas relevant
to the CUP before the Commission.
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk ' ated the Brown -A� requires the Commission
o,�,
consider evidence and information that I �I only t9 f1e item that is agenized.
She reminded the Commission that the item a , was agenized is the consideration
of modification of CUP No 2008-09.', �[h for dbes not involve Las Palmas
Restaurant.
Michel
Palmas
not 6 1 ,,problem, he ;w ould not discuss anything about Las
d it vurl�.be at anotheP:tr`r eetina.
a copy' of his PowerPoint presentation titled
No. 2008 -09 Lake Elsinore Police Report Statistics
Commissioner O'Ne,
Knight hari °ded to the
a recess in order to review the recent material Mr.
Chairman Florea call,[' for a recess at 6:48 p.m.
Chairman Flores "called the meeting back to order at 6:53 p.m. and requested Mr.
Knight to continue with this presentation.
Michel Knight provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Planning Commission
which provided data regarding police service calls. He discussed establishments in
Lake Elsinore that had police reports taken from June to December 2009 based on
the Riverside County Sheriff Department Data and noted the Bikini Beach Club
came in at 10% where his business came in at 8 %. He asked why they (Bikini
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 7 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
Beach Club) have not had to come before the Planning Commission and stated he
does not believe that he is here because Trevi is a threat but because it is politically
motivated for the past year. He showed pictures to the Commission of three under
age children which he had to call the police department to report for intoxication. He
questioned why this would be included into the statistics for saving a child whose life
was in danger.
Chairman Flores pointed out to Mr. Knight if he would like to read into the record the
last page of his presentation which discussed other political reasons.
Michel Knight stated the CUP entertainment permit
twisting against Trevi ownership by several membe
of the Planning Commission (pointing to Chairman
voted on the CUP concerning Trevi in violation
Section 87100 and California Government Code
have recused himself from attending any meefing n
Commissioner O'Neal asked Mr. Knight how
VE
incident to the Police Department such as the one;'
may have been affected by alcohol or drugs,
threatening. L? .
i used as a political arm -
i Council, and a member
A66 -have discussed and
)rn% ;Government Code
8710 G� en he should
the Tre���sue.,
sS,did he hav to report an
ned earlier where someone
the incident could be life
Michel Knight replied by saying he" 1 ntirw an eXact number but it is very
clear in Police Chief Cleary's report regarding ���re of the incident. From the
��2��
111 police reports Ito between June and Dece er 2009, eight (8) merited a
report. -
Chairman Flores requested recess at 7:08,p.m.
�r
Chairmanylo�es F called f�e=Eneeting bactC to order at 7:10 p.m. and requested if there
were, anv addition' comments from the Commission.
endoza.aske "any of the other establishments that Mr. Knight had
up for' view by the Planning Commission.
Director of't mmuni�'Development Weiner replied by saying there are certain
establishments in La'e Elsinore that are legal non - conforming, however there aren't
7
any that are undW'any type of periodic review. He stated the establishments that
have a CUP coed come before the Commission should issues or code violations
arise.
Commissioner Zanelli asked if Police Chief Cleary would like to add any information.
Police Chief Cleary stated the department has tried to separate the costs of service
calls. He pointed out that most cities in the report are larger than the City of Lake
Elsinore and in terms of a ratio there is a higher impact on the law enforcement
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 8 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
because of the size of the Police Department. He stated the assessment of the
problems has been identified. He does not have any problem with Mr. Knight hosting
events, but does have a problem with him hosting events and not providing, as he
promised to do, the level of security and notification to the Police Department.
Chairman Flores asked if the Commission has any other comments. There being no
further comments, Chairman Flores called for a motion.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Zanelli and
Mendoza to revoke CUP No. 2008 -09.
AYES: CHAIRMAN FL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT
Deputy City Attomey,:Winti
appeal and the filing period
None
Public Works Di
COMMISSIONER
VICE- CHAIRMAN
NONE
LLI
by Commissioner
explained to the applicant the procedures of filing an
the dais at'7:17 p.m.
Engineer Seumalo commented on the following:
• He spoke of the Capital Improvement Project known as the Machado Park Restroom
Renovation is underway and expects the project to be completed within a few
weeks.
• He spoke of Lakeshore Drive paving, which has been stalled due to weather
conditions however half of the streets have been paved and staff is moving forward.
• He addressed the recent storm activity and noted staff crews have been out
cleaning, sandbagging and repairing since Sunday. He stated there has been
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 9 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
significant tree related damage which has been cut down and moved to the side of
the road. He provided his phone number to the Commission to be used in the event
something needs attention.
Director of Community Development Weiner commented on the following:
• No comments.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
Chairman Flores commented on the following:
• He thanked Chief Cleary for his report. "He statedA, reps J
is he based his
issue regarding public safety." He stated he had e,opportuhftYAo review a prior
CUP. He stated through the modifications and the bontinuance of n compliance,
the police report brought forth the most important issue in the com ,and that is
public safety.
Vice - Chairman Gonzales commented on the
• He spoke of the steps leading tc,3�,fte Cultural Center that ; needs to be repaired.
Public Works Director /City Engines eurrtal stated he `would advise Parks and
Recreation Director Pat Kilroy of th ituatron, "hQwever?'he stated he would put a
temporary patch on the steps in the interim."
Commissioner Mendoza commented on the following:
• He thanked BuIldlrg ar�d Safet Code Enforcement Manager Chipman and Police
Chief 1 r attenBFighe m "fit
• He s �cj of d, ading5j ing place'at La Strada and clarified that the grading
should cease on" ary Q. Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo
st , t .staff is move � rward the environmental investigation and it is being
reque �d to have th N �ity G� ncil extend the grading until the investigation has
been cor�eted. Commissioner Mendoza asked if the developer /owner would be
responsib7 grading, a dirt road when they have completed their project. Public
�u �.
Works Director' Ity gineer Seumalo stated he will speak with the Engineering
Inspectors to eraf,at the road is maintained and that it can service emergency
vehicles.
Commissioner O'Neal commented on the following:
• He spoke of the issues with traffic at the Terra Cotta Middle School. Public Works
Director /City Engineer Seumalo stated he has addressed the issues with the City's
Traffic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer observed the issue and is trying to hold a
meeting with the Principal of the middle school before staff takes any action.
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 10 of 12
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
• He asked of the progress at Gunnerson and Riverside Drive. Public Works
Director /City Engineer Seumalo replied by saying staff is aware of the issues and
they continue to research funding. He stated Councilmember Magee spoke with
State Assemblymen Jefferies office and they had CalTrans move on the
relinquishment. The CalTrans District Director stated they have considered the
section between 1 -15 and Ortega.
• He thanked Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk for all her work with the Trevi matter.
Commissioner Zanelli commented on the following:
• He thanked staff for their help with all the issues with
27 years working in the emergency services and thi
pet -peeve of his. He stated he may have seemed'.
however, the applicant has repeatedly demonstrate d
weight. Should the applicant appeal, the City Cow
hopes they make the right decisions,
ADJOURNMENT
It was the consensus of the Commission to a(
Planning Commission meeting at 6:00"p m.
Elsinore, CA RAW
at 7.28 p.m.
wi: He stated he has spent
ea;that was discussed is a
sh in his motion to revoke
word dapsn't carry a lot of
will decldb, >" hat to do and
:tie February 2, 2010, Regular
at 183 N. Main Street, Lake
JIMMY FLORES
CHAIRMAN
Respectfully Submitted,
DANA PORCHE
OFFICE SPECIALIST III
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 11 of 12
Chairman Flores adioame
Planning Commission Meeting
January 19, 2010
ATTEST:
TOM WEINER
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PC February 16, 2010 Item No. 1
Page 12 of 12