HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/04/2008 PC Reports
.
./
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
AXEL ZANELLI, CHAIRMAN
JIMMY FLORES, VICE CHAIRMAN
MICHAEL O'NEAL, COMMISSIONER
JOHN GONZALES, COMMISSIONER
PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER
TOM WEINER, ACTING DIR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG
(951) 674-3124 PHONE
(951) 471-1419 FAX
LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
***********************************************************~*******
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4,2008
6:00 P.M.
The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the
Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community.
Meetings are held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this
Planning Commission meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the
Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown
Business District. Thank you for your cooperation.
The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at
each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community
Development Department on the Friday prior to the Planning Commission meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who
requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should
contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674-3124, ext. 289, at least 48
hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Any
writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at
the time it is distributed to the Planning Commission.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES
(Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the Planning
Commission Meeting)
\,
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
,
(All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Commissioner
or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific item.)
(1) Minutes for the Followinq Planninq Commission Meetinq(s)
a) October 7,2008
b) October 21, 2008
Recommendation: Approve as submitted.
(2) Minor Desiqn Review for Facade and On-Site Improvements to the Existinq 7.768
Square-Foot "Los Compadres" Restaurant and Market Buildinq Located at 161 S.
Main Street
Aqustin Resendiz. Associate Planner
Ext. 232. aresendiz@lake-elsinore.orq
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Minor Design Review.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
(Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the Planning
Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your item is called).
(3) Residential Desiqn Review No. 2006-05. Amendment No.1 for "Santa Rosa" bv
Centex Homes at Rosetta Canvon, Tract Map No. 25476
Carole Donahoe. Planninq Consultant
Ext. 287. cdonahoe@lake-elsinore.orq
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval
of Residential Design Review No. 2006-05, Amendment No.1.
(4) Residential Desiqn Review No. 2006-18, Amendment No.1 for "De La Rosa" bv
Centex Homes. Vestinq Tract Map No. 32503
Linda Miller. Planninq Consultant
Ext. 209. Imiller@lake-elsinore.orq
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of
Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment 1.
(5). Amendment No.2 to Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. and Vestinq Tentative
Tract Map No. 35773
Kirt COUry. Planninq Consultant
Ext. 274. kcourv@lake-elsinore.orq
t
)
Recommendation:
a.
Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council adopting findings that
the project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan;
and
b.
Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council adoption of Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2008-12; and
c.
Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of Murdock
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.2; and
d.
Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 35773, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and
proposed Conditions of Approval.
BUSINESS ITEMS
(6) General Plan Conformitv of the Summarv Street Vacation for a Portion ofthe Riqht-
of-Wav Known as "Wasson Canvon Road"
Ken Seumalo. Director of Public Works/City Enqineer
Ext. 244. kseumalorallake-elsinore.orq
Recommendations:
a. Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council finding that the
Summary Vacation of Wasson Canyon Road as described on the
attached Plat Map and Legal Description conforms to the Lake Elsinore
General Plan; and
b. Direct staff to forward a copy of this report and the Planning Commission
Resolution to the City Council for consideration.
STAFF COMMENTS
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The Lake Elsinore Planning Commission will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on
Tuesday, November 18,2008, at 6:00 p.m. to be held at the Cultural Center located at 183
N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. .
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
~
I, TOM WEINER, Secretary to the Planning Commission, do hereby affirm that a copy of
the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance of this meeting.
IIssll 10/30/08
TOM WEINER DATE
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
n
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008
Noneg"
A.'"
,,,~~i%~\;.,,,'
.$"" ""$;:~K,
ST AFFMESENT
'%..'&:''''$,
, ' , '~lM~~
Also present~~'%
Attorney Santa
Consultanf Coury,
Porche:
CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M.
Chairman Zanelli called the meeting to order at 6:00 .
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Mendoza led the Pledge of AI
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
('
ABSENT:
e Actin~j"Community' Development Director Weiner, Deputy City
ssoe"t!lte Planner Garlson, Planning Consultant Miller, Planning
tfbnmental Principal Planner Worthey, and Office Specialist
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVES CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NO.1
The following items were listed on the Consent Calendar for Planning Commission
approval: -
n
Agenda Item No. 19.-
Page 1 of 16
1. Minutes for the Followinq Planninq Commission Meetinq(sl U
a) April 29, 2008
b) September 16, 2008
Recommendation: Approved as submitted.
It was moved by Commissioner Mendoza, and seconded by Commissioner
Gonzales to approve the Consent Calendar Item No.1.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLO
COMMISSIONER G
COMMISSIONER
COMMISSIONEf.l' .
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
U
2.
,-,."*>
@j
Chai~man Zane
,A!m'%t
,........,,, ~/'"
Actlffg~\'iiRmmunity D pm. irector Weiner provided a brief presentation to the
comm's.q.. He indi ..... d staff received several letters regarding the environmental
docume~1 twas fnerated for this. project which was distributed to the,
Commissio" . not~&I'the Regional Water Quality Control Board had forward~d a
letter after th.;~l!lreview ,period had ended. He indicated he was unable to
include it in the ~j;lal Mitigated Negative Declaration document; Staff was contacted
by the Water Quality Control Board last week asking that the letter be discussed
during the hearing.
Ed Sauls, applicant, indicated that he has been working closely with staff to address
all issues and concems. He indicated the architect is available to answer any
questions the Commission may have.
U
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 2 of16
n John Chipman, architect for the project, stated he wanted to develop something
unique for the City and he felt the project would be an asset to the community and
appreciated all the assistance received from the Planning Division.
Scott Hildebrandt, Canyon Lake Property Owners Association (POA) stated the
project was reviewed by the City of Canyon Lake arid the City of Lake Elsinore: He
indicated that the POA was in support of the project. He noted an issue regarding
the access trail off Dowling Street and the concern for safety. He requested that the
issue be resolved' prior to the approval to the project.
(\
Lori Moss, City Manager of the Cityof Canyon Lake,
approval to be modified. She addressed the followin .
..
. .
. "condition
.
.
County of Riverside
.
1l.'MQJ1.L a, ;' supports the project and indicated she
~ -~, ,
~ titS!!' , '" '
>--''*'<ii' ..' , ,
" - . , ,
,appr :,L all 'the comments and support and responded to
mad'"
c.
'hS~
Chairma.. nelli closelhe Public Hearing at 6:27 p.m. ' "
f1~l '--, ~ , - ,
Commissione . ~g!lpoke of .the paragraph in the, staff report that discusses the
City of Canyon 'Re and POA not, willing to imp~ement any of the appropriate
measures as reG,e mended. He requested Lori Moss to comment.
Lori Moss stated the proposal of the trail and where it is located is dangerous to
horses and the motor vehicles using the trail. She indicated mitigation measures
need to be included in order to make the area safe, although she indicated she does
not feel it would be possible.
n Commissioner O'Neal stated he concurs with staff's recommendations and stated
the project is an excellent project.
Agenda Item No. ~o...
Page 3 of16
Commissioner Gonzales inquired if all of t~e golf carts need to be street legal,
u
- . . .
Chairman Zanelli stated no golf carts are allowed on the streets within the City.
Commissioner Gonzales stated he likes the project and w()uld be in favor of having it
developed. . .
Commissioner Mendoza stated the crossroads coming out q
than sufficient. He stated it shows good faith that the dev l
cost of t~e trail, however did not agree that the deve
when it does not benefit the project. He stated he s
stated the project should go forward.
'~nyon Lake are more
eris willing to incur the
hould incur more cost
roject is fantasti~ and
Vice-Chairman Flores inquired of the ease
Community Development Director Weiner'
abuts the Canyon Lake boundary.
ressed. Acting
s,?ment that
e. Commission and noted his
to Canyon Lake. He stated
h ving the project come
Chairman Zanelli stat
speeding outside
. to slow down. .
. project. He spoke of the
hough there is signage stating
u
mk~"'ii~~'~i.~onza . " seconded by Vice-Ch.airman FI?re.s to
~7f~"fre:c,;.~a~~ Cling that the City CounCil adopt Findings
GreenWald Commercial Center is consistent with the
ation Plan (MSHCP).
o
AIRMAN ZANELLI
ICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NONE
NOES:
ABSENT:
NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
u
. Agenda Item No. ~
Page 4 of 16
(\ It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza, seconded by Vice-Chairman Flores to
adopt Resolution No. 2008-72, recommending to the City Council adoption of
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2008-07 for the Greenwald Commercial Center.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES .
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
(\
The following vote resulted:
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza,
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-73, approving Con..
the Greenwald Commercial Cent
AYES:
. It was motio ,
adopt Resolu
Tentative Parcel
missioner Mendoza, seconded by Vice-Chairman Flores to
o. 2008-74, recommending that the City Council approve
ap No. 36066 for the Greenwald Commercial Center.
.. The following vote resulted:
AYES:
CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL'
(\
Agenda Item No.l "'-
Page 5 of16
NOES:
NONE
u
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
It was motioned by Commissioner Gonzales, seconded by Commissioner Mendoza
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-75, recommending to the City Council approval of
Commercial Design Review No. 2008-01 for the Greenwald. mercial Center.
"~t1tYi,~\%%,
Actinn.4@'!h'lfnunl
.~'" ""0:%:0:
rep,. "noting the'p'
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLO
COMMISSIONER G
COMMISSIONER
COMMISSIONER
NOES:. NONE
The following vote resulted:
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
u
3.
ent 01 or Weiner noted a correction to the staff
e 0 en on Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 1 :00 p.m.
if]
Ass Planner Rffi diz R vided a brief overview of the project. He indicated
the app twas availWe to answer any questions the Commissioner may have.
~If
April ~a~h .,~, ~iPlicant,. indicated her business partner would provide the
Commission wifl1l1Eu'!.yJlnformatlon that was needed. .' . .
,>w
^~iW"
Lori Johnston, applicant, stated it is their vision to create a place where kids can go
to stay out of trouble. She indicated the company would help raise money for those
who can not afford dance by participating with fund raising and scholarship
programs.
Dwight Johnson, owner, spoke of addition parking and hours of operation.
Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing at 6:45 p.m.
u
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 6 of 16
('. . Commissioner Gonzales stated he knows the applicants family. well and stated he
feels the business will do welL .' .
The following vote resulted:: ,
issioner Mendoza to
No. 2008-22:
: It was motioned by Vice-Chairman' Flores, seconde
adopt Resolution No. 2008-76, approving. Condition
. AYES:
('.
NOES:
NONE
4.
n Review No. 2007-04:
,0.",
Plan' Consultant 13r pr<;} ded a brief overview of the project. She indicated
staff is . "'l'I1mending +>, ial of the project because it was discovered that the parcel
in questiallwas desig~~ted. Residential 1 instead of Airport Use Area (AUA). She
_ noted the I c "trained due to. the site being located within the, mapped
Alquist-Priolo tudies Zone which restricts properties located in the Special
Study Zone. Sh.~/ tated staff could not make findings to support approval of the self
storage on the residential land use site. She indicated she received 10 phone calls
supporting staffs decision to deny the project.
('.
. Mike Dunn, applicant, provided to the Commission a detailed overview of why the
, Commission should overturn staffs decision. and consider approving the project. He '
indicated the storage unit is a state-of-the-art facility. He stated the facility would
enhance the area and would provide a buffer between the homes and Mobile Home
Park and take 58 motor homes and trailers off the streets and give them a place to
Agenda Item No. h
Page 7 of 16
. park in a safe' and secure area. He indicated that staff was always courteous and U
helpful however wished that staff would have considered the project for approval.. .. .
Eleanor Janes, resident, spoke of a house that previously occupied the location
which since has been torn down. She thought that the area was unbuildable and
could only accommodate a park.
Craig Burunton, resident, spoke in favor of the project. He indicated the project
would provide future jobs and recreational parking is needed
Bob Robinson, resident, spoke neutrally of the
ingress/egress and spoke of his concerns with s
engineer take a closure look at the project.
, .'
He noted only one
suggested the traffic
Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing
Vice Chairman Flores asked the applicari
Vice-Chairman Flores asked the a
way driveway.
Mike Dunn indicated
relocated due to sa
/tf#',
4jf1/
4~
Vice-Chairmalltplo'
,
owing the entry way being
U
I Plan Update has been finaled.
einer indicated the G~meral Plan Update
V.
<,~}
"ff"could h~lp with the Mixed Use Zoning.
Acting . munity De.. opment Director Weiner indicated the project is within a
Specific P nd alreat vested. He indicated the land use is in place and staff can
. not modify i . .~i~ Ge,tjlral Plan. He stated the applicant has the option of applying
for a Specific t-'fl;l.gJ~Jlfl\ndment, which is a more time consuming process.
'Jt#~.
Commissioner O'Neal asked at whatpoint staff advised the applicant he could not
do the project.
Acting Community Development Director Weiner indicated the applicant submitted
his application around October 2007 and within 60 days after the submittal the land
use issue was discovered. '
U
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 8 of 16
(\ Commissioner O'Neal asked how many meetings were held with the applicant and
th e arch itect.
Project Planner Miller indicated the only meeting that is noted was on December 18111
which was held at the front counter and the right of way issue was discussed.
Commissioner O'Neal spoke of the earthquake fault that goes through the area, and
why would single family homes be allowed in that area.
. It was me & d by Co, k issioner Mendoza, seconded by Vice-Chairman. Flores to
continue Co * I " e Permit No. 2007-22 and Industrial Design Revie~ No.
2007-04 off ca
o d it cost the applicant
. er date. -
. -
. .
Project Planner Miller indicated that the plan may have b
and stated she wasn't sure if it was identified that a fauU
, e
Commissioner Gonzales also noted his ~on~~r::f,)~e en
Project Planner Miller noted the exhibits s an' emergency
. access was originally planned. .
Commissioner O'Neal suggested having the p -
. instead of denying the project.
(\
Commissioner Mendoza asked h
should the project be brought back
Acting Community De
project back for a
which would hay.
ted if staff were to bring the
lete the environmental portion
p-
is not properly zoned for the area and
I $' c'
. The following vote resulted:
, '
AYES:
CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
(\
Agenda Item No. k
Page 9 of 16
NOES: ' .' NONE
u
ABSENT: NONE
, ABSTAIN: NONE
Chairman Zanelli requested a recess at 7:52 p.m. and reconvened at 8:00 p.m.
5. Residential Desiqn Review No. 2008-03. for "Jasmine" bv LeQgar Homes in Rosetta
Hills. Tract Map No. 31792.' ' 4tf;.lf~M'
Chairman Zanelli opened the Public Hearing at 8:00
. mmission with a
proval of the
.val.' He
d:,.
Acting Community Development Director Wei gEM
brief overview of the project. He stated is
project based on the Findings, and is s t to th
noted that staff has received several em s win
Jarnne Valdez, applicant, thanked staff for thel 'stance with the project. She
spoke of the new floor plans and~ they meet the et demands. She indicated
thaHwo meetings were held with tta Canyonnity in order to present
the plans and allow the residents ity to co ant. She indicated that
Lennar would like to start constructi . .el ho s sometime in November U
and the production ho s in January h .:':~rLennar Homes agrees to the
Conditions of :Ap d would vailablelfo answer any questions the
Commission ma
#
nt, s ."",.lin favor of the project. She indicated that staff has
hom,~~wners really appreciate all the help.
estedstatus of the proposed park to be located at the
n Drive and Ardenwood Way.!'
- .
Acting commun'i!y1Poevelopment Director Weiner stated that the Fire Station and
Park would be built all at the same time. He indicated that the project is currently in
plan check.
Traffic Engineer Basubas indicated that construction should begin within two weeks.
Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing at 8: 12 p.m.
U
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 100f16
n Commissioner Gonzales asked if the Magnolia Homes were single or two-story ,
homes.
Jarnne Valdez indicated that the Magnolia Homes were all two-story homes.
Commissioner Mendoza stated that the project is great and commended Lennar for
taking the time to speak with the existing residents in the community. He stated he .
su pports the project.
Commissioner O'Neal noted Lennar Homes is ed 0
Exchange and is a Florida Corporation. He a~~~ . ere is
purchasers of the homes must pay into the chdntable fund.
e also indicated he
Vice-Chairman Flores concurred with Commissioner Men
was glad to see the discussion regarding the park.
New York Stock
uirement that all
Jarnne Valdez explained that the fund il:f
used to go towards charitable foundations an
(\
. h the existing residents. He
h and had a chance to
s seemed to be happy
It was motioned b
to adopt Resolt
Residential De
Tract 31792.
a, secog ed by Commissioner Gonzales
ending to the City Council approval of
!:1e "Jasmine" product at Rosetta Hills
HAIR AN ZANELLI
. CE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
OMMISSIONER GONZALES
OMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
ciS>'
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: 'NONE
(\
Agenda Item No. J ~
Page 11 of 16
BUSINESS ITEMS
u
6. An Amendment to Uniform Sian Proaram No. 2007-07 "Lake Elsinore Outlets".
Project Planner Coury provided a brief overview of the project for the Commission.
He indicated the Commission did approve the Sign Program in March 2008. He
stated the Sign Program is for the Outlet Center. He stated the applicant is
requesting an amendment to the sign requesting the freeway pylon sign be re-
located to the south about 1,500 feet. He stated that the Iicant is available to
answer any questions that the Commission may have.
AYES:
There being no comments from the Commission,
motion.
It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-78, modifyin"
The following vote. resulted:
-f))
u
7.
Acting Commun y Development Director Weiner provided the reading of the staff
report to the Commission. He noted that City Council recently delegated the
responsibility of public convenience and necessity findings to the Planning
Commission. He stated the Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control requires
that the Findings be made from the local jurisdiction. when an area is over
concentrated with similar types of alcohol licenses. He stated that the census tract
where the Viscaya Village Shopping Center is located contains five off premise U
locations according to the ABC records. He stated ABC guidelines indicated that .
Agenda Item No. k
Page 12 of 16
(\ based on the census tract and population, only three would be appropriate. He
stated that the applicant is present and staff is available to answer any questions
that the Commission may have.
Norma Aziz, applicant, stated that she" is looking forward to doing business in the
City. She stated that she has been in this type of business for seven years and
never had problems with local police or ABC.
Tom O'Meara, landlord, noted that the applicant has a go
would like to have this business brought to the City.
Marylou Veytia, resident and Vice President of t! of Viscaya spoke in
opposition of the project. She indicated there. ~m:'too m usinesses that sell
alcohol in the area. She stated she doesn't h&f~ )roblem the convenience
store, only the sale of the alcohol.*'
Commissioner O'Neal stated that he do
store and the sale of alcohol at that location.
M.i.11he.lorrier and is about 2,000
t~ca~hat location.
'Jr
~ .
e busin~ss. " . .
Commissioner. Gonzales inquire'
was a restaurant that once stood
n
'vA
Tom O'Meara stated the proposediilpc
square feet. He state at the Pandci{~
V)':'~4t+
ould be f~ 8:00 a.m. to midnight.
S .
rification of what the Sheriffs Department
Actin 1,,!..ommunitY'i1dyelop,i nt Director Weiner stated. that the Sheriffs
Deparim'~~~tdid have ~\f1e concerns with the visibility into the store. He stated it
was alsof1" < that the,';~~tore would need adeqlJate surveillance.
__'iifit .
Chairman Zan d'~ented on the number of establishments. He stated that it
would be difficult .or him to support.
.4,'0
It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza; seconded by" Commissioner Gonzales
to deny the request and find that alcohol sales in conjunction with the proposed
. convenience store will not serve public convenience and necessity.
(\
Agenda Item No. h
Page 13 of 16
. The following vote resulted:,:
u
STAFF COMMENTS
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA '
-,"
NOES: COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
. Vice-Chairman Flores returned to the meeting a
Traffic Engineer Basubas commented on the f
. He spoke of the Rosetta Canyo
weeks.
. He spoke of the paving of Grand A 'N
. He spoke of the road improvements"<at 1-1
two weeks.
. He spoke of the
the County on t
ence on October 20th.
hich would commence in
u
ow staff continues to work with
einer for his promotion to'Acting Community
. None.
Commissioner Mendoz,acommented on the following:
. He congratulated Tom Weiner on his new title of Acting Community Development
Director. .
. He noted how nice it is to receive comments from the public.
u
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 140f16
n Commissioner Gonzales commented on the following:
· He asked if Home Depot was closing. Acting Community Development Director
Weiner clarified that Home Depot was not closing. He indicated that the home
improvement center known as Do It Center recently closed. .
· He asked if the Do It Center is the site where the Post Office would be relocated.
Acting Community Development Director Weiner indicated he was not sure if the
Post Office would be re-Iocated to that site.
· He spoke of a recent tour of the Metropolitan Water Distt4~and how the City is
losing 35% of the water due to the fish known as Sm ~ irl'd\;uggested planting
native plants to help conserve water.
Vice-Chairman Flores commented on the foll6win' :
mmission to adjourn to the October 21, 2008, Regular
t. :00 p.m. located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake
(\
. He requested st
indicated that s
adjourned at 8:53 p.m.
AXEL ZANELLI, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
(1
Agenda Item No. I Q
Page 15 of 16
Respectfully Submitted, U
DANA PORCHE
OFFICE SPECIALIST III
ATTEST:.
U
TOM WEINER
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPM
U
Agenda Item No. jQ".
Page 16 of 16
n
. ' MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
TUESDAY,OCTOBER21,2008'.
i%f'~V4':'
CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. JMJi"""
~.',
Chairman Zanelli called the meeting to order at 6:04 p..~ if'~+b
*~+ '~Wi0Ukk
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE" .
I.
Commissioner Mendoza led the Pledge of AI.tg
.,,"'
J' '
ROLL CALL
(\
PRESENT: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLO
COMMISSIONER GON
COMMISSIONER MENDO;'
COMMISSI R O'NEAL
ABSENT:
Also pres ' were Actin~'Community Development Director Weiner, Deputy City
Attorney San a .... \ubl~c Irks Director/City Engine~ring Ma~a.ger Seumalo, Associate
Planner Carlson;% . nnln' fConsultant Coury, and Office SpeCialist Porche. '
'IONAPPROVES CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NO..1
The following items were listed on the Consent Calendar for Planning Commission
approval: ."', .
1. Minutes for the Followinq Planriillq Commission Meetihq(s)'
(\
a) January 15, 2008
"
Agenda Item I 6
Page 1 of9
It was moved by Commissioner Mendoza, and seconded by Vice Chairman Flores to U
approve the Consent Calendar Item No.1.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
U
ABSENT: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S)
2. Residential Desi n Review No. 2005-28 Amend
~,o;'
;?ffi0;R<<",,~;,
Chairman Zanelli opened the Publi" '0 'J:1g at 6:04 p.
'%",<%
Planning Consultant Coury provide e ".
proj~ct. ~e noted t~4l1~~S.;.~....i.te.. ct~re ori (r.4.,.j a' #approved. He noted this is a
modification to an Cl,fpf(("~;proJect.'f:
,-{It? '4Mnw, c;@ .'
David Dunhant1fl~Ji~an~,'ranked the dtl~ssion and staff for the hard work that
was completed on th~ oJ i!j1w
~~:l:{:;nWt<y {f
Iicant'lr8fhey have read and approved the Conditions
Chair /
Ato"c,
of "proval. :Pf,0'.
, <1#1;:<:/,
;~.
. nham indica:. yes..,
WJ-k% ~
"':;.:,-~~ . ,
apPlicai'~'statedhe would be available to answer any questions that
ay)iave.
,i'Y
Jay Skinner, apw Icant, noted he would be available to answer any questions that
the Commission''inay have. '.
Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing at 6:12 p.m.
Commissioner O'Neal concurred with staff's recommendations.
Commissioner Gonzales spoke of the design of the project and agreed with staffs U
recommendation.
Agenda Item J b
Page 2 of9
(\ Commissioner Mendoza agreed with Commissioner O'Neal. He thanked the
applicant for working so, hard with staff and coming up with: changes that the City
requires.
Vice"Chairman Flores welcomed the applicant.'
Chairman Zanelli concurred with staff and the Commission and thanked .the
applicant.
It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza, seconded by
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-79, recommending to th
Residential Design Review No; 2005-28 Amendment N
,~:f
48
,~f,
',0,>;,
'''i<t
missioner Gonzales
''Council approval of
The following vote resulted:
AYES:
;,.'
NOES:
NONE
(\
ABSENT: NONE
3.
"mme'rcial Desi n Review No. 2008-05'
'Re-thru located at 31712 Mission Trail
Hearing at 6:14 p.m.
n pr ided a brief overview of the project. He stated the
ew landscaping and a new design on the outside structure.
present and meets all requirements of CEQA.,
ect representing the applicant, stated that he is in agreement
with the Conditiq} of Approval and would be available to answer any questions the
Commission may have.
Mark Moore, applicant, spoke in favor of the project. ..
n
Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing at6:19 p.m.'
,
Commissioner Gonzales asked about the ladder on the outside of the building
Associate Planner Carlson indicated the ladder would be located on the inside the
building.
Agenda Item ~
Page 3 of9
Commissioner Mendoza. concurred with staffs recommendations.
u
. .,
Vice Chairman Flores commended the project and the improvements. He also
spoke of the landscaping. He asked if the store would close during construction.
Peter Blanco. stated the store would,be closed a very minimal amount of time, but
would keep the drive thru open.
: Vice Chairman Flores stated he is looking for to theopening{f!{~it';);!
. . . o.
Commissioner O'Neal spoke of the architectural design -
Chairman Zanelli concurred with the
recommendations.
staff s
It was motioned by Commissioner Gonz~J"t*second-
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-80, recomme I;l '. th
that the project known as "Taco Bell" reno
Species Habitat Conservation PI n (MSHCP).
'%t4til{:wi',
by CommisS{~\~'Mendoza
'iLty Council a(lpt Findings
consistent witli the Multiple
The following vote resulted:
AYES:
u
Chairman Flores, seconded by Commissioner Gonzales to
80-81, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-06.
AYES:
CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES:
-NONE
u
Agenda Item I b
Page 4 0[9
(1
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
It was motioned by Commissioner Gonzales, seconded by Commissioner Mendoza
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-82, recommending City Council approval of
Commercial Design Review No. 2008-05.
,
The following vote resulted:
.I"
(1 4.
/
AYES:
NOES:
CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZAL
COMMISSIONER MEN.D~P'l.
COMMISSIONER O'Ng~'
,jS0'?Y
4'if7
NONE .:":01'"
k'
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Commissioner 1\1: doza indicated that he had no comments.
Vice Chairman Flores had no comments.
Commissioner O'Neal asked how much land will need to be dedicated.
n
Project Planner Coury stated the total would be three (3) acres that would be
dedicated to RCA for MSHCP purposes.
Commissioner O'Neal agreed with staff recommendations.
Agenda Item I b
Page 5 of9
Commissioner Gonzales asked what would be done with the original property.
Adrian Kulinski stated that are a total of three parcels. He stated ten ACRES were
sold to Toyota which would be developed into a Toyota Dealership. He stated it is
their plans to develop a another import dealership. .. .
Chairman Zanelli pointed out that the three (3) acres in question could not be
buildable because it is in the flood plain.
It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza, seconded
adopt Resolution No. 2008-83, recommending the Cit
the project known as the Auto Group Dealershi
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MS .
The following vote resulted:
AYES:
NOES: NONE
*'.~.
ABSENJi"rid%%", *"
^'
.".",
llowing vote res
.;.':>0;i;~p
qw$&
'fF*'*'
AYES:
0'\\1;'.11>..,' ICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
<111:';'7 COMMISSIONER GONZALES
}if COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
~ COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Agenda Item --lb.-
Page 6 0[9
()
()
u
(\ .It was motioned by Commissioner Mendoza, seconded by Commissioner Gonzales
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-85,. recommending to the City Council approval of
General Plan Amendment No. 2008"03..
The following vote resulted:
(\
NOES: .
CHAIRMAN ZANELLI .
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NONE
i
AYES:
ABSENT:
NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
'\
J~t?h. 'l~&{
)W1-''''~-'''i' . .
~'ed by Commissi5ner Mendoza
,the City ,Council approval of
. .
It was motioned by Commissioner Gonzales,
to adopt Resolution No. 2008-86, recommend in .
"'PYA, ,
Commercial Design Review No., ~ -07. . .
AYES:
Engineering Manager Seumalo commented on the
(\
. He indicated that Chuck Mackey, Traffic Engineer for the City for ten years passed
away suddenly on Thuisday'October Hlth. He stated funeral arrangements for
Chuck would be held on Wednesday, October 22nd at the Veteran National
Cemetery in Riverside. He noted that Chuck was a great mentor and will be greatly
missed. .
Agenda Item ~
Page 7 0[9
· He spoke of the road improvements at 1-15 and 74 Hwy. He indicated. in order to U
help with the traffic flow a new traffic proposal was approved by Cal Trans.
. He spoke of the Rosetta Park and Fire Station. He indicated that a deal was made
with the awarded contractor to phase the project and work should begin sometime
next week.
. He spoke of the paving improvements along Grand Avenue between Machado and
Riverside Drive that is currently under construction.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
. He gave his condolences to the f~lJ'i1y of Chuck
. He wished Wendy Worthey goodf\ .' her new job
74. Public Works
vernor signed the
mission is the
Commissioner O'Neal commented on the following:
. He asked if Cal Trans relinquished control of h
Director/City Engineering Manager Seumalo indA~c<lt ,that t
Bill earlier this month and the California,1mf1"sportation
authorizing body.ii'
4!
Commissioner Mendoza commented on the
Commissioner Gonzales commente
U
. He asked if the Lo
Carlson indicate
teak Hous .... uld be .' nin~ soon. Associate Planner
be open b~fpre OctoBer 31$.
, -t,vA '.'
ilt.. ,,3'
ed on the fO,!IJ>Wing: .
~>::%/t#"
tions ilila'be made to the residents on Third Street
ake place. Public Works Director/City Engineering
ith the contractor about road assistance. He noted
re in the County's jurisdiction and would need to
ted on the following:
mpathy to the Mackey family.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the consensus of the Commission to adjourn to the November 4, 2008,
Regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 p.m. located at 183 N. Main Street,
Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530.
. Chairman Zanelli meeting adjourned at 6:49 p.m.
u
Agenda Item J h
Page 8 of9
(\
AXEL ZANELLI, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Respectfully Submitted,
DANA PORCHE
OFFICE SPECIALIST III
ATTEST:
//~~G"
,:;'f%,:;;"",~
TOM WEINER c0"~;'~)ih
+;il!$(x-
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP
(\
(\
Agenda Item I b
Page 9 of9
nITY OF ~ ,,',
LAKE 6LSiNORt:
\ ' I
~~ DREAM EXTREME~
",
"
"
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION,
,'" ,
TO: '
, HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
"
,
FROM:
TOM WEINER,
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
" '
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR FACADE AND, ON-
SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING 7,768
SQUARE-FOOT "LOS COMPADRES" RESTAURANT
AND MARKET BUILDING LOCATED AT161 S. MAIN,
STREET (APN: 374-263-004).
MARLENY MERINO, 21170 W. CROSSCREEK DR.
SANTA CLARITA, CA'91350
MARLENY MERINO, 21170 W. CROSSCREEK DR.
SANTA CLARITA, CA 91350
SUBJECT:
('\
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Proiect Reauest
The applicant is requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for the rehab as'well as the
related on-site improvements including facade enhanCements, and landscaping to the
existing 7,768 square-foot "LosCompadres" restaurant and market located at 161 S. Main
Street. (APN: 374-263-004).
Project review is pursuant to Chapter 17.11, Historic Downtown Elsin'ore Ovei-lay District,
Chapter 17.44 C':1 (Neighborhood Commercial District), Chapter 17.66 (Piuking
Requirements), Chapter: 17.94' (Signs-Advertising Structures), Chapter 17.82 (Design
Review), and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards), of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). _,
n
The Historic District Guidelines indicate that project review shall be conducted by the
Design Review Committee. Therefore, according to Section 17.11.060; Upon approval by
the DRC, which is made of same' members' of the Planning Commission acting as a
separate committee, no further design approval by Planning Staff or Planning Commission
shall berequired.
hGE;~:Jiq nEr.~ ;~O. 2
PAGE I 0;';:).. -,
n
n
n
Minor Design Review
November 4, 2008
Page 3 of 9
Los Compadr'es Restaurant & Market
as well as by the City's building inspectors during their inspection that the roof structure
was deficient and in an unsafe condition. A "Stop Work" order was issued at that time and
a demolition building permit was requested, which included half of the roof as well as the
south end wall of the building. (Permit No. 08-052).
April 11, 2008
The applicant'resubmitted a revised set of plans to include new trusses for the roof area
that was demolished and the south end wall of the unoccupied building area which was
intended to be remodeled. (Permit No. 08-47n, ,
April 17, 2008
The applicant was notified that due to'the increased scope of the remodel and rehab of the
existing building, the proposed project could no longer be approved or considered a Tenant
Improvement and that a design review approval was necessary. '
Proiect Description
- .')
Since July 13, 2005; the property owner has been trying to rehab the existing building to
achieve a true to form "Mission" architectural design as well as additional ornamentation
and decorative onsite landscaping enhancements in an effort to attract additional clientele
and ultimately to have a better fit within the Lake Elsinore Downtown Historic District.
The existing "Los Compadres" restaurant and mini-market has existing on-site parking at
the front of the building along Main Street, as well an interior parking lot atthe south end of
the building. Per Historic District Guidelines, the. establishment also uses public parking
located on West Sulphur Street across the street from the establishment. No additional on-,
site parking is required, as there is no additional square footage proposed. The project also
includes landscaping and a trash enclosure area tl:1at is located completely within the limit~
of the building. The enclosure is accessed and screened by a double door'wood gate,
therefore preventing it from being visible, tothe' public eye and becoming a nuisance.
,., .
AGENDA ITEM 2-
PAGE 3- OF 'TI
(\
Minor Design Review
November 4, 2008
Page 5 of 9
Los Com padres Restaurant & Market
The applicant is also proposing to recstripe the existing front and interior parking lots and
increase the existing landscape by providing-planters so that they either meet or exceed
minimal LEMC requirements_
Circulation and Parkinq Space Lavout
The vehicle access points into the existing site and the number of parking spaces that
currently exist will remain the same given that the project only entails a building rehab and
facade improvements and does not propose any increase to the existing .building square
footage. .
Floor Plan
The existing floor plan will have a minor modification which will include the removal of a
non-bearing wall located in the center of the building in an effort to open up the floor plan.
The interior remodel will also include two (2) restrooms at the southwest end ofthe building
and a low wall that will divide or separate the new dining section from the produce and
retail area is also proposed.
(\ Architecture
The applicant is proposing to do a building rehab as well as related on-site improvements
including facade enhancements to the existing "Los Com padres" restaurant and mini-
market by using elements representative of "Mission" architecture_
The north elevation which faces West Sulphur Street is currently enhanced by an
appealing landscape which includes four (4), date palm trees with a minimum height of
twenty (20'-0") feet and a variety of shrubs and ground covering. The north elevation has
also been decorated with a ceramic tile bandthatis located half-way along the height of
that plane which functions as.the dividing point between the two (2) earth tone colors in
order to provide a contrast and interestalong the long elevation. As a final accent and in
order to screen the existing air conditioning units that extend over the existing roof line, the
applicant-has proposed to continue the decorative parapet design that reflects "Mission"
architecture.
The east elevation which faces Main Street will display greater detail and a number of
accents representative of "Mission" architecture which will include a series of multi,curved
parapets with window openings that will be decorated with wrought iron and a rustic wood
accent at the base of the window opening. The east elevation will be complemented by
protruding canopies with red "s" tile supported by rustic wood brackets. The entry ways will
have furring borders that will provide a recess effect and the final accent will be achieved
by a "faux" water fountain located at the center of the building which will be a replica of the
design of the proposed parapets.
(\
AGENDA ITEM 2-
PAGE20F ,+(
n
Minor Design Review
November 4, 2008
Page 70f9
Los Com padres Restaurant & Market
"Castle Stone b Behr Paints"
"Creme Burlee b Behr Paints"
"Southwest Rockwood"
"Castle Stone by Behr Paints"
"Black Pearl by Behr Paints"
"Desert Shadows by Behr Paint"
"S"-Tile Roof
"Summer Heat"
Wrought Iron
Wood
Clay
Analvsis
Sitina
(\
The existing site plan, with attached conditions of approval, meets all applicable.
development standards and criteria outlined in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning
district and the Non-Residential development standards outlined in Chapter 17.38 of the
LEMC, including but not limited to setbacks and building height. The C-1 (Neighborhood
Commercial) Zoning district does not have a minimum lot coverage or minimum f1oor-area-
ratio (FAR) section within the LEMC, the existing building, with renovation improvements,
will have a lot coverage/FAR of approximately fortycseven percent (47%).
Onsite Circulation & Parkina
,
The existing. "Los Gompadres" restaurant and mini-market .has five (5) existing on-site. ,:
parking spaces at the front of the building along Main Street, and.ten (10) interior parking
spaces at the south end of the building for a total offifteen (15) parking spaces. This is in. .'
addition to the City's municipal parking located on West Sulphur Street. Given that there is
no additional square footage to the original building footprint no additional on-site parking is
required.
Architecture
n
The proposed exterior renovation of the "Los Compadres" restaurant and mini-market
complies with the Architectural Design Guidelines listed in the Community Design Element
of the Lake Elsinore General Plan. Additionally, the proposed "Mission" architecture style
has been designed to achieve harmony and compatibility with surrounding commercial
buildings in the vicinity of the project site. Correspondingly, the applicant has provided a
variety of building design features and forms in order to achieve the best true-to-form
AGENDA ITEM 2-
PAGE:J.... OF .2./
Minor Design Review
('\ November 4, 2008
Page 9 of 9
(',
(',
Los Compadres Restaurant & Market
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolutions
3. Planning Commission Conditions of Approval
4. CEQA Notice of Exemption
5. Draft Acknowledgment Conditions of Approval
6. Reduced Site Plan and Elevations
7. Materials and Colors Board
8. Full Size Plans
AGENDA ITEM L
PAGEi!... OF 2..1
RESOLUTION NO. 200.8-
(\
. .
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,' CALIFORNIA, .
RECCOMENDING ApPROVAL .OF MINOR DESIGN
REVIEW.
WHEREAS, Mrs. Marleny Merino, has initiateid proceedings to request
the approval of Minor Design Review for the building rehab as well as related on-site
improvements including facade enhancements, andlandscaping to the existing 7,768
square-foot "Los Com padres" restaurant and mini~market located at 161 S. Main
street. . .
"
\ \'
WHEREAS, the proposed pr,oject islpcated the,southwest intersection of
Main Street and West Sulphur Street, within the Lake Elsinore Downtown Historic
District at 161 S. Main Street (APN: 374-263-004). The proposed project is within the
C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning district and it has a General Commercial (GC)
Land Use designation under the General Plan designation; and .
WHEREAS, the Design Review includes design details for the building
rehab as well and related on-site improvements including facade enhanqements, and
landscaping improvements of the existing 7,768 square-foot "Los Com padres"
restaurant and mini-market; and , .
(\ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ofthe City, of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of reviewing and making discretionary, decisions
pertaining to commercial projects; and . .
WHEREAS, public notice of the project has' beengiven;'~nd . the
Planning Commission has considered evidence pre,sented ,by, the Community
Development Department an~ other, interested parties at a public meeting held with
respect to this item on No'(ember 4th 2008, ' . ", '.' .' ,.
. '.-" . .
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHECITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Cornmission has 'considered the propo~ed
design for "Los Compadres" restaurant and mini-market' and related on-site
improvements including facade enhancements, and landscaping prior to. making a
decision and has found them acceptable. ,.
n
'.. . . I... '. -
SECTION 2. . The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines
that, Minor Design Review is categorically exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (Public Resources Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the. Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations SS 15000 et seq.: "CEQA
Guidelines") pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1) (d) and (e) (Existing Facilities)
categorical exemption. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that the project is
Agenda Item No, 2-
page.JL of::d::r
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-
PAGE 3 OF 3
2008.
PASSED, APPROVED AND. ADOPTED on this 4th day of November
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner . .
Acting Director of Community Development
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss.
) ..
'Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
.,
I, TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Community Development ofthe City of
Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008- was ,
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting
held on the 4th day of October 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following
vote: .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
" .:
., .
Tqm Weiner, .
Acting Director of Community
. Development
"
(
Agenda Item No. 2-
Page n of ..+ '/
(\
(\
~
(\
The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project
site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a
statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of
Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674~3124. The sign shall be
placed on the property prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8.
9. The Minor Design Review approved herein is good for two (2) years from the date
of approval. After the two (2) years has expired, an extension for a third (3'd) year
may be granted by the Director of Community Development. After the third (3rd)
year extension expires, the applicant may be granted a final extension for one (1)
year or fourth (4th) year and final extension; subject to the review and approval of
the approving body.
10. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of the Parks & Recreation
Department.
11. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of . the Building & Safety
Division.
12. A rain sensor shall be provided for the project, which will assist in the conservation
of water.
13. All exterior or 'ground mounted equipment, service equipment, grease traps, etc.,
shall be effectively screened from public view. .
14. All exterior roof access ladders .and roof mounted equipment shall be located
within the building and be located below the roof parapets, so as to not be visible
from public view. .
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
15. The applicant shall pay any/all applicable Library Capitalll11provement'Fl.Ind fees,
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16. Any/all applicable fees shall be paid, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance' of a building permit: the applicant shall submit a line-of-site
plan from all elevations, so as to verify that all roof mounted equipl11ents is not
visible and effectively screened from public view.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICA TE OF OCCUPANCY
18. The applicant shall meet all conditions' of approval prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
I.GENDA iTEi.1 [JO. 2-
PAGE--12-o;: ;)..-,
('\
(\
(\
FIRE FLOW
28. . Minimum required fire flow shall be 2500 GPM for 2 hour duration at .20 PSI
tesidual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible
material is placed on the job site:Fire flow is based on type V-B construction per
. the 2007 CBC and buildiAg(S) having a fife sprinkler system.
SUPER FIRE HYDRANT
29. The average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 Y,"x2 Y, ") shall be
not exceed 450 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 225 feet
from any point on the street or road frontage to a 'hydrant as measured along
approved vehicular travel ways.
RAPID HAZMAT BOX
30. Rapid entry key storage box shall be installed on outside of the building. Plans
shall be submitted to the lake Elsinore Fire Services for approval prior to
installation
WATER PLANS
31. The applicant or developershi:1I1 separately submit two copies of the water system
plans to the Fire Department for :review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water
company with the following certification: .., certify that the design of the water
system is in accordance with. the requirements prescribed by the lake Elsinore
Fire Services....
BLOG PLAN CHECK
32. Building plan check fee shall be paid in a check or money order to the City of Lake
Elsinore before plans have been approved by our office.
WATER CERTIFICATION
33. The applicant or developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from
the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and. that the
existing water system is capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour
duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not .
exist, the applicant or developer shall be responsible to provide written certification
.that financial arrangements have been made to provide them.
(."CErJCA iTf::['o'l iJO.
PACE I.,
z.-.
Of J- (
(\
must be installed by a licensed C-16 contractor. Plans must be submitted with
current fee to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation.
Note: A dedicated alarm system is not required to be installed for the exclusive
purpose of monitoring this suppression system. However, a new or pre-existing
alarm system must be connected to the extinguishing system. (.separate fire alarm
must be submitted for connection)
TITLE 19
40. Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code.
IF THE RESTAURANT SERVERS ALCOHOL A SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL BE
REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS:
41. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 2002 edition (13D and 13R
system are not allowed) in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater
sprinkler system (s) with pipe size in excess of 4" inch diameter will require the
project structural engineer to certify (wet signature) the stability of the building
system for seismic and gravity loads to support the sprinkler system. . All fire
sprinkler risers shall be protected from any physical damage. The post indicator
valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and the minimum of 40 feet from the building protected, on the same
side of the street and driveway. A statement that the building (s) will be
('1 automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans.
Automatic fire sprinkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any manner. If a
system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit, column, or other building
construction, it shall be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance t6 each side
and to the front of the system riser. Access shall be provided by means of a door
with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six' (6) inches in width by six (6) feet
eight (8) inches in height.
Applicant or developer shall be responsible to install a Central Station Monitored
Fire Alarm System. Monitoring System shall monitor the fire Sprinkler system (s)
. water flow, P.I.V.'s and all control valves. Plans must. be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to installation.
n
AGENDA IrE.a :.0. 2
PAGE.--lLOl= ;)..-,
(\
n
n
100 lEi
CITY OF ~
LAKE 6LSiNORf:
, . I
.;s,;:...~ DREAM E;(TREME_
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
"DRAFT" CONDITIONS OF.
APPROVAL
Subject:
Minor Design Review for the rehab of tl)e existing building as well
as related on-site improvements including facade enhancements'
and landscaping to the . existing "Los Compadres" restaurant and
mini-marketlocated at 161 S. Main Street (APN: 374-263C004).
I hereby state th,at I have read and acknowledge the Draft Conditions of Approval
and do hereby agree to accept and abide' by all final Conditions that will be
approved by the Planning Commission/City. CouncIl. I also understand that all
Conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate
of Occupancy, or as ptherwise indicated in the Conditions.
"The decision of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake
Elsinore shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the
decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council of
the City of Lake Elsinore pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (L:EMC).
Print Name:
. ~7!?!7;t;p
H c((l~n~ M-tf/h 0
9...//70/f1)(tS ('ft)SS (--raa-K 0,...
Sau~ uS (8, ,/1]50
ft&/I ")1) -'<6S 3> b .
Date: 10- ) 0,0 <6 Applicant's Signature:
Address:
Phone Numbe~
ea(r,
r~':::[iJ=.c'.TfC:; ;"-iO. z..
PA::"~OF .).. I
"1'3 ll:tO 910lCl'll
n
I
!
0i
~
I
(\
~.
~ .~ --.-.
~ '" '='==-"":'.....~".i::'-~
.. "'::::l ____.._..._....
< .., ----..---
~ "'~~ :.=H.=-="~
m, ' ~~.. .~-_.""'-_.
~ ' r'''' ~-==-....."....
. ~~" _.--~.---
1
.
i . 'g
, , ~ g !,
O\~! g s ~g
I lii~ I. 1 !~
1 ~~r~ ~.s 31 03
~~ ~~(l~ ~'3 ~!?~
!!J ~1fitlz ~'" :< zl"\
t, ~~!l II 1.!K
11 ~!" ,~~ ~~".
, ," ~.,~ 81' 01
g II Ii!; ',"I ~!~.
~ h~ O!~~ ~i~ ~~~~
~ ~~ ~~1~ ~D~ r~S~~
~ i~ ~~~~ ~i~ ~~~e~
~~ i~ ~:i!~ ;aij !!;'l
~8 o~ di!!o'f ~~H h~Ol,.
I! ~I
J !I
N
i! ~ i
:(lLO
,
'0
,
.
"
;,
.9-,l,
~ l;~
,g,
."
,g,
~~I;!
~
.9-.lll
.,
~LO
.:)-.1
I;
I
I
.9~.'9
""0.0-,1>'
.0-,2
!
,
~
o
o
" ,
M
~i~
f~
- ~
.
l
I
~I!!
,;1
IIi
''V'J '~ONIS1;J ;N'Vl
'lS NIW~ 'S I ~ I 'ss~aa'V
ONr..;JV'l ;IN;Jl~'VV'l '~;INMO
,
N!
,
<(~
,
1""N011~~!O~~'"o..<l:ll<"'!<lO
... .<:JI<~dn":)O dO ;U""",.\1j~:>
i EI Y'"Nr10~N;r"oN.I.CIl'Ilf'f:)
:~~ .:)yd..J.N.....L.~j~l1\t'"
I ~,,~ ~".~ m 'WM"
I
I
I
I
-~-1-------
I~l, I
.~
i ~
~
.,
,
" ~
'I. ,..
I' ' . x
!iii! w ~
"
!!illl .
,
II~~I :! ,
'1"!I'1
I! !!h!i .,
! , '.
. !
1
" w " I
,..,.. {
, 155
e 0: I
I
I
, i
'I ,
! .,
e
61:: ~
, ,..>< ~
w "
"
;,
;
.N
,
I '
i~~iLi]'
II'il ~.il1
i
[S 'i'
~l'~
~
.
. z
.0 5
fo~~ ~
" '"
~~,' 0
9
L
;, 1;
z
.
~ ,
gs -
~
.. ,
ee .
Iii
..
. 9
~I~ " 81
l~
.
~, ."
" .. ,. S-,ll
5-.111
.
t
,
.H
I'
~
~
I
i
I
.
{;G:[}l;:}:. r{~:'.~; ~lD, 2-
Pt,:;" ;)- 1 OF :>-,
.l:lfKIOlId'lVNOLL...:II.ID;I'IISiOCUflY""....II3I:IIlOOlIoI
(\
(\
/
n
COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD
ROOFING MATERIAL
CONCRETE "S"-TILE - COLOR: SUMMER HEAT
WALL MATERIAL
DECORATIVE TILE
COLOR: DESERT TAN
STUCCO - PRIMARY COLOR:
CASTLE STONE
STUCCO - ACCENT COLOR:
CREME BURLEE CREAM
PARAPET RAILING
WROUGHT IRON - BLACK PEARL
RAFTER TAILS AND PARAPET WOOD ACCENTS
WOOD - COLOR: DESERT SHADOWS
t"CE~~uI~ rrE[~;1 hiD.
PAGE ;).5 OF d'
m~111 -_.~
'l:'a:."'T:~~
. I ;r.;.,i:='..==.:=-=a
r.:u,.=:.=-r:t.Al.": ;,
I h~~ ........n.~~,;
Ga"" ....,=--=.......
~~ol --
v:J ~ClNISB 3>I\f1
'LS NIVI'I 'S ~ 9 ~ :ssaroov
ClNIlB1'I3I'B'Rl'ffl 'lB'WIO
~
~
o
~ I
i ~ ! ! ~
~ ~ I w i I
~ ~
I
~ ~
~ ~ ~ I
,
P I I ~ ~ H ~ ~
~ ~
n H I ~ n ~ ,
~
I
,
.
; 1: ~
i 0 i
01 -= I
z
, 0
, ~
I I
i ~
I-
~
o
J.:lIlOOlU....-_lIPIIO.llI'I'II\I'UlD~
AGENDA ITEM ~iO.
PACE ;)1 OF
CITY OF .~
('J-,AKE 6LSiNORf:
\. I
~... DREAM EXTREME.
REPORT to PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: TOM WEINER
. ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: NOVEMBER 4,2008
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05, AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR "SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON,
TRACT MAP NO. 25476
APPLICANT
& OWNER: CENTEX HOMES, 1265 CORONA POINT COURT, CORONA,
CALIFORNIA 92879, JANE BLASINGHAM, PROJECT MANAGER . i
(\
Proiect Request
The applicant requests to amend a previously approved residential project known as
"Santa Rosa" by Centex Homes. The amendment replaces ttie existing Santa Rosa
products with approved products currently being offered at "Fox and Jacobs at Rosetta
Canyon." Centex proposes to construct the Fox and Jacobs products on the remaining
twenty-two (2z..) vacant lots within the"98-lots of Tract 25476. .
This project is located within the Ramsgate Specific Plan (SP), which allows approval by :
the Director of Community Development. However, given the recent direction by both j
the Planning Commission and City Council regarding revisions to previously approved '
design reviews, the Director chose to have this case go ,to a public hearing in !
accordance with SP.implementation guidelines, and defer the decision to the Planning i
Commission. .
Proiect Location
The project site is located on the south side of Riverside Street, east of State Highway ,
74, and west of Steele Valley Road; within the Ramsgate Specific Plan (Assessor i
('""'\ Parcel Nos. 349-240-001; 349-420-001 and "002; 349-430-006, -007, and -008.)
Agenda Item No. ~
Page i of -=r...""
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
Environmental Settina
u
Project
Site
North
Scattered Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residential
("Santa Rosa"), Open
S ace
Single Family Residential
uCarawa ," llAu usta"
Vacant and Single Family
Residential under
construction "De La Rosa"
South
East
West
Proiect Backaround
,Ramsgate Specific
Plan
R-1, Single Family
Residential
Ramsgate Specific
Plan
Low Medium Density
Ramsgate Specific Plan
Ramsgate Specific
Plan
R-1, Single Family
Residential
Ramsgate Specific Plan
Low Medium Density
Centex Homes is nearing completion of the Santa Rosa portion of Tract 25476. Of the
original 98 lots, 76 have been constructed and sold, including a model complex with
three of the four Santa Rosa products offered. Centex now wishes to construct Fox & U
Jacobs products on the remaining 22 lots at the northernmost edge of the tract.
Pursuant to the Ramsgate Specific Plan, the Fox & Jacobs products were originally
approved by action of the Director of Community Development on August 26, 2004, as
Design Review No. R2004-07, for the 179 lots in Tract 25479. On April 4, 2005, two
additional products were added to the Fox Jacobs offering, and approved by the City
Manager. . Finally, on January 30, 2006, The Director 'of Community Development
approved the Fox & Jacobs products for construction on the 213 lots within Tract 25477.
Staff requested that Centex notify their residents of the proposal. Centex offered to host
an Open House on September 17, 2008, to which they invited the residents. within all of
their tracts in Rosetta Canyon, as an opportunity to. view the proposed changes in .
product types and voice any concerns they may have. Planning Staff attended the Open
House and noted that only one resident participated, and. she had only positive remarks.
about her house, neighborhood and relationship with Centex Homes.
Proiect Description
The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Residential Design Review No. 2006-05
consists of the following elements: 1) Plotting Plan, 2) Elevations and Floor Plans and 3) .
Phasing Plan. The Model Home Complex that is currently being used for Fox & Jacobs
will be used for the Santa Rosa project. A Site Plan for the existing Model Complex and U
approved Landscape Plans are attached to this Staff Report for information only.
Agenda Item No. 3
Page ~ of Xfo
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
(\
,
The applicant offers six (6) products with four (4) elevations. The Santa Rosa products "
included a single storY plan and the Fox & Jacobs products also offer a single story ,.
plan. The details of the proposed six (6) products are as follows:
,'Plan 1 - 3 bedrooms, 2 bath, 2-car garage, single-story @ 1,640 sJ. "
Plan 2 - 4 bedrooms, 3 bath, 2-car garage w/opt. 3rd, 2-story, @1,979sJ.
Plan 3 - 3 bedrooms, bonus room, 2 Y, bath, 2-car garage w/opt. 3,d. 2-story, @
. 2;400 sJ. " '.
. Plan 4 .:... 5 bedrooms 3 bath, 2 car garage w/opt. 3'd, 2-storY, @ 2,613 sJ,' '
Plan 5 - 4 bedrooms, family room, 3 bath, 2-car garage w/opt. 3rd, 2-story@2,710
sJ. '
Plan 6 - 4 bedrooms, bonus room, 21/2 bath, 3-car garage, 2-story@ 2,875 sJ,
.'
'.
The existing Santa Rosa tract includes four (4)products with four (4) elevations, ranging
in size from 2,266 sJ. to 3,487 sJ.' ' .'
Aanlvsis
(\
Staff compared the Santa Rosa products with the Fox & Jacobs products and found that'
the Fox & Jacobs products are equal to or exceed the architectural features of the
... .' - )
Santa Rosa products. Although the square footage of the proposed Fox & Jacpbs;
products are smaller, the new plans still offer a maximum of five (5) bedrooms, three (3)'
bathrooms and optional three car garages. Staff feels that the street view will be
substantially the same since the architectural styles, colors and materials proposed
blend with the architectural styles, colors and. materials currently. being used in the
Santa Rosa development. Staff has the benefit of observing the quality of construction'.
at the existing Fox & Jacobs neighborhoods in Tracts 25479 and 25477.
Other portions of Tract 25476, as well as 25478, contain the Solana, Caraway and
Augusta neighborhoods, all by Centex Homes. Staff believes that Centex offers a
diverse and complete range of choices within the Ramsgate Specific Plan. .
The amended project will continue to provide the" same fencing and landscaping
materials that was previously approved. The, proposed modificatioQ is c9nsistent with
the Ramsgate Specific Plan, its Design Guidelines, and implementation standards.
Environmental Determination
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No, .1 ,does not propose
substantial changes to the Ramsgate Specific Plan, nor would any substantial changes
to the Specific Plan result from its approval. No new significant environmental effects,
noran increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. are anticipated.
" , "',
. -..
n
The Ramsgate Specific Plan Third Revision Final Environmental Impact Report was
adopted in 1984, a Final Supplemental EIR was adopted in 1989, and Addendum Nos.
.' . . . Agenda Item No. "3
. . . Page 3- of '3Jc,
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
u
1 and 2 were adopted in 2003. Most recently" the. Ramsgate Specific Plan Sixth
Revision was approved and the accompanying Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2007-
01 adopted. Surrounding. development that has occurred since.then were identified in'
these documents. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is undertaken that-would require major revisions
to the EIR or its related documents. .
No new information of substantial importance has come forward with respect to
significant effec.ts or alternative mitigation measures that have not been addressed in
the design of this project The applicant is conditioned to comply with .the Mitigation
measures established for the Ramsgate Specific Plan.
, .
Therefore, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and pursuant to
Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and, Negative Declarations, of said act, Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission determine that no further environmental
documentation is necessary for the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-05
Amendment No.1.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution approyi[1g
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No. .1. U
Prepared By:
Approved By:
. Carole K. Donahoe, AICP, Planning consultan~ ~. I
Tom '{Vei~er, Acting Director o.f Community bev~lopme~ \ ~
Attachments:
1. Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Map
2. Resolution No. 2008-~ approving Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No:1
a. Conditions of Approval'
3. Exhibits
a. Exhibit 'B' - Site/Plotting Plan
b. Exhibit 'C' - Typical Landscaping ,
c. Exhibit 'D' - Building Elevations and Floor Plans
1) , Model1640 .
2) Model1979
3) Model 2400
4) Model 2613
5) Model 2710
. '6) Model 2875
d. Exhibit 'E' - Color and Materials
e. Exhibit 'F' - Phasing P,lan
f. Exhibit 'G' - Model Complex Location and Plan (For Information Only)
g. . Exhibit 'H' - Previously approved Santa Rosa products (For Information Only)
4. Draft Acknowledgement of Conditions
5. Draft Notice of Determination .
,ij.
u
Agenda"lte~No~ ;,"
Page ~ of~(P
]
i
i
I
(\
VICINITY MAP '.
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2006-05
AMENDMENT No.1 for SANTAROSA
. . "'.....
'. .sy-.1
'1'"
'S~.I .
Cl:
I-
.(2
:::l
o
.en
~
:::<
DORCHES R LN ,
,
,
.,
/'
Cl:1
0'
. ~ I
o. .
01' .
~,lITILE VAL EY RD
:::< I'
>:
en.
en II . ..... ;
C2,' , ..
~ l ~CENIC CR~ST [)~:
.' ' , ~
i:
,
,
,
,
,
<{
z
(2
<{
.,. D
~~\.\.\ ~
"W1"'~
1-
(' .
. PLANNING COMMISSION
11/04/2008
-v
"WO'~" ".... ,." 3
huL;,!~,'i' It.:H' ~~".'.
PA:JE. ') Ci,~ l/ 10
EXH!BiT _.
'fll
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR "SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA
CANYON, TRACT 25476 . .
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes (the "Developer") requesting approval of Residential Design Review
No. 2006-05 Amendment No. 1 (the "Design Review") for a revised product for "Santa
Rosa for the remaining twenty-two (22) lots inTract Map No. 25476; and .
WHEREAS; the project is located on the south side of Riverside Street, east of
State Highway 74, and west of Steele Valley Road, within the Ramsgate Specific Plan,
APN's 349-240-001; 349-420-001 and -002; 349-430-006, -007 and -008 (the "Site");
and
WHEREAS, the Design Review includes design details for thirty-six (36) lots
including a model home complex located off site on Carla Court; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making decisions pertaining to residential projects;
and .
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub.
Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 99 15000
et seq.),. public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork
associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has
been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall
be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require
major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2.
Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of
the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or .. ."
Agendalte~No. ~.
Page..JlL of ~
u
()
u
('.
3.
. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence
at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative
declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(8) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially
more severe than shown in the previous EIR; ,
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be
feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially
reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or - -
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably
different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would
substantially reduce one' or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative."; and
('.
/
-WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was adopted in 1984 for the
Ramsgate Specific Plan, a Supplemental EIR was adopted in 1989, and Addendum
Nos. 1 and 2 were adopted in 2003. Most recently, the Ramsgate Specific Plan Sixth
Revision was approved and the.accompanying Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2007-01 (the "MND") and a Mitigation Monitoring Program w.as adopted thereto.
WHEREAS, public' notice of the Design Review has been given, and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respeCt to this item on November 4, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS: '
- SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design
for the remaining twenty-two (22) residential homes prior to making a decision and has
found them acceptable.
SECTION 2. The _ Planning Commission finds and determines that in
accordance with ,CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the Design Review does not
present a substantial change or new information that would require further CEQA
analysis. The environmental impacts associated with development of the Design
("\. Review were contemplated by; fully analyzed in, and mitigated through the various
Agenda Item No, 3
page.=L of 3!k
environmental documents prepared and adopted for the Ramsgate Specific Plan. No U
new CEQA documentation is necessary for the Design Review Amendment.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with Section 17.82 of the City of Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the
approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No.1:
, ,
1. The project as conditioned will comply with the goals and objectives of the
Ramsgate Specific Plan, the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Zoning
District in which the project is located.
The General Plan designates the site for Medium Density Residential (3.6 to 5.0
. dwelling units peracre) in the Ramsgate Specific Plan, and the Design Review
implements this density.
",. -
The Zoning District on the site is Ramsgate Specific Plan, and the Design
Review complies with all development standards and design guidelines of this
specific plan.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in the Ramsgate
Specific Plan and where silent, other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code. .
Staff found that the proposed "Fox & Jacobs" product types are equal to or
exceed the product types currently being offered at the Santa Rosa project site. U
The. "Fox & Jacobs;' products offersilJlilar architectural styles, features, colors
and materials. The applicant wifl provide the .same fencing and landscaping .
materials that, are currently being used in the Santa Rosa development.,
Therefore, Staff concludes that the merging of the previously approved products
and the newly proposed "Fox & Jacobs" products wifl blend together creating a
seamless unification of product types.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees
and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in
accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the Ramsgate Specific Plan
planning district in which the site is located.
Conditions have been applied to this project that prescribe. site design,
setbacks, height, architectural design,. exterior materials, colors, textures,
landscaping, lighting, walls and fences, grading and phasing.
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the
attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No.1.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption. U
Agenda Ite~ No. 3
Page~of~
n
(\
(\
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this fourth day of November 2008.
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss.
)
Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
I, TOM WEINER, ..;\cting Director of Community Development of the City of
Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008- _was adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
the 4th day of November 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
. ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
Agenda llelJl., No. 3
Page ----'1... of::::g:"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON, TRACT 25476 U
GENERAL
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers,
employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its
officials, officers, employees or agents concerning the project attached hereto.
PLANNING DIVISION
2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No.1 will
lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within two (2) years of the Planning
Commission approval date. The Director of Community Development may grant an
extension of time for up to one (1) year prior to the expiration of the initia'.Design Review.
An application for a time extension and required fee shall be submitted a minimum of one
(1) month prior to the expiration date.
3. The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office
within five business days from the approval of this Design Review amendment by the
Planning Commission. A check in the amount of $64.00 payable to Riverside County shall
be forwarded to the Planning Division by the applicant for this purpose.
4. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building U
elevations, plotting plans and site plans for the Residential Design Review, or as specified .
by these Conditions of Approval. Any other revisions to the approved plans shall be subject
to approval by the Director of Community Development or designee.
a. All lots shall meet the minimum setback requirements of the Ramsgate Specific
Plan. Where dimensions are missing on conceptual plans, it is assumed that
. Precise Grading Plans will comply with these s'etbackreqliirements.
b. Materials and colors depicted on approved materials boards shall be used unless
modified by the applicant and approved' by the Director of Community
. Development or designee.
5. Applicant shall submit, for review and approval by the Director of Community Development
or designee, a detailed Plotting Plan prior to the issuance of building permits for each
phase, which indicates the style and color scheme to be used on each lot. Styles shall be
evenly distributed throughout the site. The identical product and/or color scheme shall not
be constructed directly across or adjacent to one another.
6. Applicant shall meet all Americans with Disabilities Act requirements for access to the
Model Home Complex.
Page 1 of 10
u
T-.. "0 -:l
~.:'~~~.; ".., ..:j". 7
I.';L'.~~~~~..(.; .~
(\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1
.
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES@ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476
7. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the underlying Tract 25476 and the
Ramsgate Specific Plan, unless superceded by these conditions.'
a. Applicant shall comply with all' relevant Mitigation Monitoring Program
requirements as set for in the Ramsgate Specific,Plan, Sixth Revision.
b. Construction on the property is subject to the' terms and conditions of the
Development Agreement and subsequent Operating Memorandums ,of
Understanding executed by the City pertaining to the Ramsgate Specific Plan. i
8. This project is not within a designated Redevelopment Agency Project Area.
(\
9. The applicant shall comply with the approved Phasing Plan for this project, which shows
primary, secondary and construction access for each phase of the project. Any changesto
the approved 'Phasing Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director'of
Community Development or designee, with concurrence by the Engineering, Planning and
Building Divisions, and the Fire Department.
10. The applicant shall provide a' flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- :0"
adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area
shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Director 'of .
Community Development or designee, Precise grading plans shall identify the location of
the aforementioned flat concrete pad and all air conditioning units. .
11. The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the
entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant
shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit.
12. The applicant shall comply with all . requirements of the City's Grading Ordinanc'e.
Construction generated' dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance' with the
Mitigation Monitoring Program measures, or where they are silent, the provisions of
Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control
measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer. . ;
13. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during
construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the
Director of Community Development or designee.
(\
Page 2 ofl 0
J~~G,~)A i'i:.:;i2 ~iO. "3
PAOE (( Or lfCo
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476 U
15. The applicant shall pay school fees tothe Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to
issuance of building permit.
16. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District (EVMWD).. The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to
the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards, including payment
of applicable water and sewer connection fees.
17. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards
for fire protection.
18.AII mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall be ground mounted. All
outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location
and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the Director of
Community Development, prior to issuance of building permit. Utility company meters may
be excluded from this requirement.
19. Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception
that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
20.AII theme walls are required to be',coated with anti-graffiti paint. All wood fencing shall be
painted or treated with a high-grade solid body, penetrating stain approved by the Director
of Community Development or designee.
u
21.Any retaining walls visible to the public shall match the interior masonry split face block
walls in color and style. ' "
22. The developer shall ensure the replacement of wood or block wall with tubular steel view
fencing on all slopes. Where residential lots have view fencing at the rear lot line and the
depth ,of the rear yard is greater than 30 feet, the last ten feet of wood fencing shall be
replaced with tubular steel view fencing.
23. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for
two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20'.
24. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and
construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before
7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall
not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. It is the developer's
responsibility to ensure that contractors and subcontractors at the project site comply on his
behalf.
Page3 of 10
u
f.La;l1,jJ/\ iTb~~ i~O. "3
PACE (;) 01' I..{ Co
("\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR'
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006.()5 AMENDMENT NO.1, .
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES@ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476
25. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site
. identifying the, approved days 'and hours of construction activity and a statement that
complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of.Lake Elsinore Code
Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be placed on the property prior to the
issuance of a grading .or building permit- ;
26. Upon violation .by the applicant of the City's Noise Ordinance or the Condition of Approval
regarding hours of construction, the applicant shall cease all construction activities and
shall be permitted to recommence such activities only upon depositing with the City a
$5,000 cash deposit available to be drawn upon by the City to fund any future law
enforcement needs that may be caused by potential project construction violations and the
enforcement of the City's Noise Ordinance and Conditions of Approval. The applicant shall
replenish the deposit upon notice by the city that the remaining balance is equal to or less
than $1,000.
Prior to Issuance of Grading/Building Permits
27. Prior to Building Permits the Construction Supervisor shall meet with Planning. Division
Staff to review the Conditions of Approval.
("\ 28. Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign
and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall retum the executed original to ..'
the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. :"
29. These Conditions of Approval shall, be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to '
issuance of building permit.
" -'
I;.
30. Revisions to previously approved Landscape and Irrigation Construction Drawings shall be
submitted if applicable. Three (3) sets of .the Final Landscapingllrrigation Detail. Plan shall
be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. Plans shall be approved by the City's
Landscape Architect Consultant and the Director of Community Development or designee.
A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the
Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. . .
a. The applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree List, at .
a maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 24-inch box in size.
b. Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches.
.,
c. All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with
automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent-plant and
grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods.
n Page 4 of 10 .
I,GENDA ITE..) [JO. 3
PACE 13 Of' "f~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR.
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476 U
d. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet
all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to
. the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip
irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering.
e. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any
phase.at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building.
1. All. exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and
within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control
. vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of
certificate of occupancy.
31. Revisions to approved Wall and Fencing Plan for the area shall be submitted if applicable,
in compliance with the fencing standards within the Zoning Code Section 17.14.130.0 prior
to issuance of any building permit, and subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director or designee. . . .
Prior to Final Approval
32. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy and release of utilities.
u
33.The City acknowledges receipt of a copy ofth~.recorded'CC&Rs that include this project. .
34. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain project improvements and facilities including
'. the private drainage improvements, common areas, and landscaping as approved by
Community Services Director and the Director of Community Development or designee.
35.AII front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped and irrigated with
an. automatic underground irrigation system to provide 1 00% plant and grass coverage
using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods.
ENGINEERING DIVISION .
36. Conditions of Approval for Tract 25476 are in effect for this project.
37.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if
the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as
determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading
Page 5 of 10 U
f.GE.;;)A ITE:.; liO. '3
PACE I Y OF LfCo
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1, .
('\ "SANTA ROSA" BY CENJ:EX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476
plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and
flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. , ...'
38. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map
of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall
be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
39.Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan routing ,civilian traffic around constructi6n
activity.
40.AII grading shall be done under the supervision, of a geotechnical engineer and ,he shall
certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control.
\ ,.,
41.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way."
42.Arrangementsfor relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the,
roadway or. alley shall be the. responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead
utilities shall be undergrounded.
43. Undergrounp. water rights' shall be dedicated to the' City pursuant to the provisions 'of
n . Section 16.52.030 (LEMC); and consistent with the City's agreement with the. Elsinore
, Valley Municipal Water District.
,. I
44.Applicant shall pay all applicable development impact/mitigation fees, including but not
limited to TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and Area Drainage fees, unless the project is exempted from
such fees by an executed Development Agreement with the City.
. _c.,
45.Ten (10) year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storrtl runoff
shall be contained within the street right-of-way.,When either of these criteria is exceeded,
drainage facilities shall be provided.
"
46.AII compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 'h",x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final .
. inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. I
,1
47.Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's
association or other maintenance mechanism as approved by the City,' . ,
} "';
48.AII open space and slopes (except for public parks and schools) and flood control facilities
outside the public right-of-way shall b,e,owned and maintained by homeowner's association.
49. All landscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distance Standards.
. ~ !
(\
Page 6 oflO .
AGENDA iTE,,] ,;0. 3
PAGE 15 Of ,'--I~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476 U
50. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waster disposal and recycling, the
applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste
material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear
and grubbing or all other phases of construction. .
51. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property
. owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to adrainage easement.
52.AII natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be
collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. .
,'I
53. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs
should drain to a landscaped area. . . :' . . ,
54. The applicant sliall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect, including the submittalof
a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board. .
55. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge
control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances
prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or .Iocal. surface waters. This
includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other
waste remains. Brochures. of "Storm water Pollution, What. You Should Know"
describing preventing measures are available at ,city Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or
waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or'Waver - is strictly
prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
u
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
. .
- ,
56.Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Reports prepared
by a Registered. Civil Engineer for approval, by the City Engineer. The grading -plans shall
include mitigation/protection of any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by
- development of the site and/or diversion of drainage.;rhe grading plan shall also show that
no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections in order
to meet sight distance standards.
- .-,
57. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design
Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations.
, -I '
recommendations.
Page 7 of! 0
u
k~t:.;i''liJA HL;o;'~ ,~o. 3
PACE (~ Or l(~
('\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR'
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO. l' '
.
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476
58. The' applicant 'shall obtain all necessary off-site easements 'and/or permits for off-site
grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading
permit issuance.
59. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant
shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in
Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
60. Applicant shall provide the City with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance-of
grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction; which
describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance
responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval.
61. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Notice' of Intent, approved WQMP plan and
SWPPP plans.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
('\ 62. Unless other timing is indicated, all Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
, condition of development for Tract 25476 and as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal
code (LEMC) prior to building permit.
63.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water
agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and
specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and
volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
64. Provide proof that.no structures, landscaping, orequipmentare located at intersections and
street curves that could compromise sight distance requirements.
65. WQMp and erosion control plans shall be in place to the, satisfaction of the City Engineer,
66. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check fees (LEMC
16.34).
Prior to Occupancy
67. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an, encroachment permit issued by the Engineering
Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All
('\
Page 8 of 10
A0CfiJA 1TI::i, 1JO. '3
PAGE it OF ~b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476 U
fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of
Occupancy..
68.AII compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final
inspection of off7site improvements will be scheduled and approved.
69.AII public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as
conditions of this development and/or Tract 25476, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as
.specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements shall include
street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements
related to the project.
70.AII signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street
Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract.
71. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District
requirements.
72. Proof of acceptance and maintenance responsibility shall be provided for all open spaces, U
. slopes, and drainage facilities.
73. Proof of participation in the Lighting Maintenance District shall be provided.
74. Post construction erosion.controls and landscaping shall be installed and approved by the
City Engineer.
75. The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall as-built the mylars. A digital copy of all
completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond (amount to be determined
by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement.
76. Prior to occupancy, the grading plans shall be revised to reflect the "as built" construction
and/or grading of the project.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
77.Annex into CFD 2003-1
Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit
or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public
safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a four
Page 9 of.! 0
u
. co.." \-\...., "0 "'2.
KV~I:~i.JM. k.-~'. i.~ . 7
PACE I % OF ~"
(\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 AMENDMENT NO.1,
"SANTA ROSA" BY CENTEX HOMES @ ROSETTA CANYON TRACT 25476
thousand two hundred dollar ($4,200) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the
annexation process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900
x2334 or dandersonlalharris-assoc.com.
78. Annex into CFD 2006-5
Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit or
building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District 2006-5 to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the new parks,
parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and
federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project.
Applicant shall make a four thousand two hundred dollar ($4,200) non-refundable depositto
cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at
(949) 655-3900 x2334 or dandersonlalharris-assoc.com.
, 79. Annex into LLMD NO.1
Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit or
building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District NO.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public
right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for
street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for. electricity and. a
n . maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. Applicant shall make a four thousand sev!'ln
hundred dollar ($4,700) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation proce~s.
Contact. Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at. (949) 655-3900 x2334' .or
dandersonlalharris-assoc.com.
(End of Conditions)
(\
Page 10 of 10
. 1,,~'~i;.;I;;;JA i'I'L;~ ~JO. "3 "
PAOE-LLOF I.{ b
\~
~~,,/i.e/~
"".-' .
_~....._______" I
l. II
,/ I;
~
'c:c
~
~~~
~:!O
CiS .. # 0::
C\I
~....~
i::O~
~~.~
~
j.;;:
oi!>
=
=
'"
.,.
l:"
0-
W
C>
w~
wO
:::<::~
5z
....
u..Z
OZ
~~
U
~
-,
i~lf !. I' i
'i' I I I.
if. II! Ii! Iii d I!
P..~!. !,I!,~,L<<III! hi'
!I' 8 I 'i' ~I -,
~ i!Ji1 ~Illtllall!l ~!ii!!!liliil
~~~........ ....
e l~ii"1
:~~I
a~~I'
i ~;lr' \
ill
61
ii!H
, .
. ..1 w.
~ I iii II i
I, !l':' il! I
,,,,. IClll~ ~Ii!l
bit ilillll ciih
:",
r~
, -{
. _,.J~
, :~
L~
to. "....(7'
r;,,-
,.-.-,.,...."
!2
~.... "
~ ""'jj
.,..! H:ll,r,~1\\1Il
. ~ mil - ,lid!1
I
I
I
I
.J '.j
3aSlliMI .00 - .....lNlo:l
1'<IIlN3GJS3lJ
>->8
-
.
PACE '" r.
d-V OF -"tI7-:'~"~~-
- ~ ",-...
i (0
EEH
(0'
o
C"
EX~~'~ ~ Brr__
.rp
/ {j 1.3
z
o
i=
is
9
~
8
;
1:1
z
m
~ I ~
'0 ~,;'"
.2 !!! iI: ~F
~ m ~ ~ ~I m
~ !~ ~ I. I i
Gl ~ ~ ~ 5i ~ ~ (l
! ! l i i! ~ ! if
~ ~ ~! ~~ ~ I ~l
~ · ~. .~;. ~i
~ ~ l i ~i ~ ~ Ii
<
~ III . . II
. ~ ~
l!i ~!i i
U~ ~h i"1
; ~ '"1 .
.,. I!~ .~
.~~ 8,~ .
.ue... ~~
'~8~~~~ ::~
il!i~ls.~~
e ....~~h.,
!j!", ..s
~
I
i I
~ I ~.~
~ . ~z 2~
. il ~ ~g k~
~ '" i- ;;:-
~ H~ II ~
~ ~ fiil . iiI ~
! E ~~ i~ ~
~U ~~ 5~ ~
9... ilj its: ii:~ ~
:liig:lg::1 ~
~i~ ~iE ~iE If
3!! 5 ~~ ~~ ~
ITmITmII
I ,I i
. w ~ ~ ~
i ~ > . ~ ," ~ 8
~ !I ,U~ ~I!I~I E~! ~I~
h~~~~!~~h.m~h i ddd
. g
~ "i I ,8 i~
ill'! ~~ iil !lid
Hl~! 5dhl~! ~U 3 ~i!~t
e.i i~~.m'i~'il e i'I~~'
E nhi~IHlMnu E U hi
[J
g
ffi
m ,I !rih ~ 8d~1
~~. ..", . !<.~l;
~jl g~m~ !Ind~
g;, E
: ! ~ l
~ ;, . ~ g
::I '" 0 1aI
~ 13" il :!
h ~i.g ilUd
~.~ ~ l~.i;~ :; ,".~I.
::t:ei t;1'!~ ~>- ES~'i~>~
~U !M~I!mdi
Q
~+ ~,
~ "GENDA In::,] 1~O. ?
PAGE J-I Or:
u '. .
z ~ ~
z . :
<
:1:-;
Z "
Cl , ~
",";:
u
l . ~
::1:';:'
" -'
.. c, ~
d ~::
Zti
0.6
.~ ct
Z <<l
< rs
u~
<g
~Cf}
~~
~~
Cf)~
o ~
~r::
OJ
0...
<<l
u
ell
"d
1a
....J
.-<
<<l
E
0...
OJ
u
t::
o
C/l U
I"' I
::E \0
o t-..
:I: '<1'...
Lr)~
X N 0
t1l ..... ~
~ . u ~
Z <<l 1lI
I"' ... ~
, f-< C/l
,
I
\
(
~~ t::t _ ! _" ~
,;,'I'!:.!;:,II!
:!ilibdll iil!l
8 8 8 88e
lidl!!
III illli,
I
,
..
,
.,-s
~~ ~f _ i ._ .
!i. 'iii Pi !~ ~ ~l
m;i!ldh!ill
8 e e 8ee
i "~t
ii''''!
.llmh,
. I d~ ~
~ ~&: i : Ii ~ fi - ii i ~
~ ~16 -'!iii ~ i lilU~1
~8 ~g g~J )u!;~!, h i 19~ =~!I~
!ii!s hi~; I~ I ij ~ I:~ liii
~hd~~iUlt~iI1_: ifilhd
e e eeeeee e
i'
-f
Bi;!
'II-
liil!
w
~ I
z
o
"
3
~
"
w
.
"
w
w
"
w
"
S
"
m ~
"U ,'I I '
", ",'III; "11'
! ~ ~ ~ . ~g
MI! II ~Mlii! iii I!!!!
E) 00000 00El@@€l
i,.
ill
'1,11
_ ~~l~~
w
o
z
~
"
w
~
w
"
S
~ ~
~ ~
\:<t-0
1,
, ~'
..
~,'
..
,
,
"
~
w
~
"
o
.
w
w
>
C
<
"
B~
w..
c,
~ ~ !
" ,~!.-I-
~ :
~~ 1m : ~;; i i
I~ iiih ~ i ;: 'I . ~ : i
~~~e,!- "JjHHi
I~Uri~~I~~~a~
o €I 00e0800@
!i,
Pi
ill'll
;!I!
E")Ft "~K"""""
',' ~I: \, ","~ W
' \, Do OU u _
w
o
z
~ VJ
o '"
~ ~ ~
" 0 >
o :x:;>
--:-:==] ~! &S ~ ~
g. f-o u 0
. Z l:< N
, '" <lI 1i
1<.13 AGElmA m:~,1 N& ~ '"
~ PACE )- J-- OF
-
.
~
~ w
z ~
~ ~
c .:
. .
~.... l:J
~< ~
ffi~ ~
"" "
~~ .
~~ ~
~~ ffi
"I 'I
'1111 Ii " I
1"1.11011
I' -1'111"
n loin ..!l
000000 000
ffi
~
;;:
w
o
<
"
~~
. ..
w,
i
\~r
()
z
O~
>-~
Z.t
<t::~U
uo<:
19
<t::~
~.
~t!::
~i1'i
Cf}'"
Of-<
~
VJ
<lI
,~
...
~
l:<
~
"d
o
o
..c:
...
o
;g
co
,~
<lI
Z
"-
VJ
-
,~
'"
~
<lI
o
U
lIC:,
(0
In
n
e~
@]
"
c :;~i". I
~ ~5 Ii I
~ ~8" I
o.!,ll- ~~ I
~g -.
@]
@]
Il"iI
Il"iI
__1
I
I
I
EXHH3!T_
Ie.. I
'iI ,I I .' I I
! ==:"1' ~ ~! ! ! ,! ! ! ! ! !! ! nu I
Ill. I ! i
dl'lll! qUo! 1111 I
I, ill-I IIIII i I ill! I ! I
1,,'1 I 1'-1 Iii
Iii II II ! IIi I I"
il illl! 911 i IIII i III i I i I
~I+ 'a@l'.-II...iMleIID
l'
. A(,i::rjOA ribi, ijO. '3
PACE :::r '?> OF \.I (p
..!J~.3
u:
,
,.'
,
, ,
"';
<
<,
, ,
I,.
.'
" ~
. .
v
;-;
< -
- ,
~:~
Z
Ot)
~.g
Z.t
~~
Ui>::
.l'l
~~
E--4~
E--4~
~~
CJ)~
O~
~
Cf)
'"0
...
C<l
>-<
Cf) ....
I<l !::
:;s 0
o ...
:Z::' ~
~
I<l
U
.....
C<l
u ~
ol"""l '0
P..~
;;...-
L. ~
"Oi
w
(Q) O::z
00
I!J!Jl z......
......V'l
00 ~......
~ = wi:::
=
'" wO
= 0>
I!J!Jl ~ :::'::t:)
:5~
<<J I-
U u..Z
C> oz
I!J!Jl ~~
(Qb
u
u
u
.
.
"
~
.
u
'.J) ,
EX~~HBrr = If /,/01'
ITE"' "'0 3 .
AGENDA ,,,... _ (I'"
PAGE d "1 . Of --=:t.:e- .
~;
,I'
W
@ O:::z
00
I!J!Jl z.....
.....U)
co ~.....
~ = w~
=
'" wO
= CI:l
'1!J!Jl N ~(!)
:s~
g I-
U I..L..Z
c:> oz
I!J!Jl i;~
(Qb
u
n
"" !l5
n
~
.~
']) I
..-:......"..
"'"!" "'r:r;.,:: ';!"
E' "<,, I;.~':(:,'.::!, .
'j\lhW. ~ =Z,# /:L
m
~
~
~
~
z
i
ij:~ll
~',;I
~:~1!1
~~~!
o
~ !!
"'8:1
I. .'
.,
~i
,
~
!f!
~.... .
-r
jV
,
~
~
.~
u
AGEND.!:\ IIE,,1 ;;0.
PAGE .9. 5
'3
OF LfC:.
(Q1 C:::z
00
rn z_
-(f)
~ co ~-
=
= wi::
C'-.I
= 0> wCl
rn iN ~19
t?) ...... ::s~ U
u u...Z
rn a 02
(Qb ~~
U
~ e'
a
"
< <
~ ~
~
~
<
.
<
~
~
z
<
.
u
z
.
~
.
<
~
.
~
<
.
,
<
~
~
o
"
~
<
8
"
~
~
'.. .',- r. f. ,fl. ""'. .,......=~ . ]) /
t;At=~ l ttt ~ =
s ? /,:t
u
-~
AGENDlit rn",; ;;0. 3
PAGE ;}(." OF Yh
w
(Q) O::z
00
MJ] z_
-Vl
~ co Vl_
= -'>
= W_
"'"
= 0> WQ
MJ] C'I ~l..:) ~
::s~ ~
g >- .
W u...Z 0
MJ] C> OZ .
~~
(Qb
u 8
.
~
~
.
z
~
.
,
.
g .
~
f
. u
(\ . ~
~ .
~
0 .
. ~
.
~ ~
. z
. ~
z ~
0
E ~
~ u
II
! ~.
I
1,
g
m~ j ~~7=""\
!' / ,,_n
i~ '. '
q-r
,15
L
n
~':--r'"" .1
-~
E,:'C'.~\Fr: r f
''":~A~'''''~ ~
"r ']) I
..Wa:.o=_~"
1- "d fA.
p
t;!'ll
~%
>j!!;~
e""
X:,,_
o
~ ~i
~ ;~
:; ~~
>
~~!
:!~!i
.,
::",....,
t.5,
II
r
.' ,,c, 1]j
DE, _:~"G1,'. "'~,',' '..'~. '~.,"
ieU "'.,','-,<
f ~~;'~l ~J
~j~1~1
~, ,Ii
~:f:l
~!~~!
o
il1i
il
~~
>
"
;;1
~::;i
,
"~E".."n '''C'. "0 3
.H.V h...h'~ 1 i ....,. ~d .
PAoe d- r OF If(,
(Q)
I!JW
~
=
I!JW
o
I!JW
@f:
w
CX:z
00
z_
gg ~~
~ LU;::;
c:r> W Cl
c<t ~ l-'
l- :5Z
u -
C) u.Z
oZ
6~
E. ~ r~
1'="~ }.C ~ TI ~. "); ~~~:.'"
'. ..t~' tl; tQ':.
L =.
.5 'j- /;;Z.
Iii
"
<
~
~
~
~
~
<
<
~
~
<
00
>
!
'j)'
."
u
~
<
~
<
~
<
~
u
"
<
~
<
!
<
~
~
u
I\GErlLJA iTE:}1 NO.
'3
OF Lfr..
PACE ;). ~
~ ~
. u
~ ~
(\
~ ~
~
~ z
~
"
~ z
0 ~
~ t
g ~
u
~~-~'-f7~ : -
- ('\ ~'i'1}j;'j
~r "# m
k ...!' a_.
,-- ,-, f.
., I
I I 1J
I . I
L__.._.____J._~~J
(Q) w
O::z
IY!:!I 00
z_
-Vl
~ = ~-
=
= wi::
'"
( 1!:!l 0> wO
C<t ~(.!)
<<J I- :S~
u
CJ u..Z
IY!:!I oz
@b ~~
U
(\
"
z
~
Q
~
~
.
~
~
~
u
~
'''''I
{"
~;;i!l
~!m
o
~i'! _ lr~ .. fll.. U
~~ J,-!.~~ . .J
~-tr~l!.
L II -.J
-""---"JPi
-
"
:j
,.
:I;
~-- }Ol
~.,--~
Il<d
I" -
~
.
I~II
,,~..
~~?!
,
E'" ~" on N. "-="'"
~, "/-.'/. I'~=-): r! : "~ 1,!
'\ .( -'.'..' ,:.'
,~.::,.~, ~c t I::-~;L ~ -.
'.D I
..
~ 'I-' I t1-
~uEND$:1 iTE~:i NO.
PAGE ~ 9
?
OF l.{ b
~;;j~
~~~n
o
-
gi
-'
.,
~~
"
,
"
.'1
j;
'g
w
(Q) O::z
00
I!J!JJ z_
-(J)
00 ~-
~ = wi:::
=
...... wO
= a>
I!J!JJ eN ~(!)
~~
g >--
L.l ILZ
0 OZ
I!J!JJ !S~
(Qb
u
'J) ,
':-;\':_<"f,~~ ~ ~)'~ -.A
EAnL. ~.... 7 ';f /.2.
()
<
o
o
"
<
~
u
~
>
~
o
u
.'~Ai-t: ' '3 _~
AGE..u I L'o' ;:, l..( b
P'""", -:2.'-'" "_"~~_~
X-..rr;; ~ ~,,_,. ,__,
(Q) w
O::z
00
I1!!Jl z_
-VI
~ ex> ~-
=
= w2:
= '" wO
~ ~
c<l ~~
g I- :5~
L> u..Z
I1!!Jl C) oz
lQb ~~
u
(\
~
o
;;
~
o
"
i
~
~
~ ~
. u
(\
< ~
~
" "
~ ~
~ ~
.
z
~
~
u
g~mif
--j 'iill
.--.lIs . .,,'.
.' - ".,,'
, tl ~ iJ~r.' . 1, i
I ~ ~ .\! ~ ';~::5!!
U I = Id .. ,!ii Hi
~'! i5 ~ii~!!
~ .1.... 1."'~I'i:j
-~L~'~';;' I! l! !,.~J
I
J
~I'
!t~
(\
E""',""" PGSi - .~
4-A~~ig>'J~_
\ J) /
'"
J? ,y /.:l..
i~:1
,..
i~;j;
;
~I~~~'
I~ !I;:..-~ ""12""..
;!~ __~J::::. m I i. ,r
.a.. .c. I .. I"
.' ~
1 .; c'
l!3 ,~.
,"-~' J3
!L""~~
""'I
~,."
~;~:i
t~~;l
,@
, .
;;1Ii
g.-
O'':!:t
0'.
I"~
,,~
-'I
~~!!
";
kGEi~uA rrEi:.; l~lJ. '"3
PACE ;S I OF l.{ Co
w
(Q) O:::z
00
IillJI z.....
.....V')
~ co ~.....
=
= w~
'"
= ... wC
IillJI ~ :..::<.!)
g I- :5~
w u.Z
/!M 0 oz
!;~
(Qb
u
,
x
~ ~
. <
< 0
0 "
"
~ <
w
~
x ~
~ ~
w w
~ ~
< ~
0 "
< ~
~ X
X <
~ >
z <
< w
w
'1"\ /
E~:~:~ \,f" H,~,H ~ FJ;. TI~r -V _
t-..~i'\.E b ~ t1&' J 11 --
u
u
u
q 'f' 1-:2.
.--"D" ITE" po '"L
h.vb'<i M ~l.. ~'Ii .__,?..-~...,.~..--==
PAGE 3 J- of_<1L
(Q) w
O::z
00
11M z_
-Vl
\~ 00 . ~-
=
= w2:
'" ~
11M "" wO
C<t ~~ ,
::)z 0
~ >- 0
w - ;;
C> u..Z
11M Oz
(Qb g~ ~
~
z
~
5
.
"
~ ~
~
. ~
0
"
n
~ ~
"
~ ~
z
~ z
~
" ~
<
~
~ ~
~
" 0
~..
t,,~
~
m_";
: I!I ;;-
J;
i ~ d 15
b~1
~:~m
~;:;l
g!.-~.~.;,
:!PI ...
i' @
!ll ;.
l!'.; ~;
di~~
Iil~..l~..'.
..:Iti
!i t
I
[
I
-,
!Il!
.m. Ii:;
H!
'5i
II
t'1
n
,
"
~~i
.~
E~ ~[~---~ r ~', r7
I\.~ HW. U -
'])'"
/,1 'll..t
....
""'\
~j;;il
~:~;!
~1~11
@
Si
:l
~~
.
"
;~~
~~*
~
kGENiJA 1m,] ~jO. ?>
PACE ~ '3 OF~
I.LI
!Q) O:::z
00
I1!!JJ z......
......VI
~ = c:J......
=
= I.LI~
'" I.LIO
= 0>
I1!!JJ C'l ::'::(.9
0 I- ::i~
u u...Z
I1!!JJ 0 oz
iS~
(Qb
u
\ D'
.'~ -~ "' _c. _'_~
,,' :. y, i' '. Ii Jj ",'~ '." ' :,:'~'"
t:A'=8 ~ ~~ ~ _.
11't /;l..
u
9 ~
0
"
~ <
.
re
~ ~
0
~ .
~ ~
~
0
()
.
~
.
< <
. ~
. ~
N
8 8
.
. ~
~ z
~ <
.
0
u
'II!
p,CErm.'\. iTEr,1 NO. ""3
PACE 3'" OF Yh
w
(Q) C::z
00
11!!:!1 z.....
.....V)
\~ = ~.....
=
= w~
'" WCl it
Q>
11!!:!1 ~ ~~ ~
::s~ .0
g >- .
u u.Z .
11!!:!1 c:> oz
(;~
[Qb c
U .
0
.
~
z
~
%
~
"
~ ~
u
.
. .
.
n .
N
C
.
~ 0
.
0 ~
. ~
~
% .
c.
. %
<I c
~ >
.
. "
~ g
"
f\
,-~,,!
-le-
I
I
15
!ll
'1>
1:;
ei
:~
'"
;1~
.~ .~
'iq'
<" !"~,i
J~jiLL'-' "
f~
""'1
{"
~~1~!l
~m!
@
r n
_...~
~J
~9:
.'PI
f"
~i.!:l
@
p:
UL,_, t.,
Ii"'"'
I,~..,
~ I "1 '
. I~ ,-J
~~cj
w~'~'~ .,,~
.
, .
".-
.,'
!,l
0',
r~~
ill
,
--1
!1l
;
i'
,.!!:~
'"
"l
i
c
!~
I
'I ..~..,
i tl
L~
"
!;!
.....
'I
J.\GENJP~ 11E:':1 fJO. 3-'
PAGE 3 s"" OF LIfo
~v~wu~r:'"""'!
,., t,\', ,;; '" r:..
. '"<,,,r/ \" ~ '" ~u _
, .]) I
\It
/~ IZ/ j,;L
~~(C~~'W~lQ)
OCT 29 Z008
em OF LAKE ELSINORE
PLANNING DIVISION
'U
E" l'~ H. n., .... r...... 't::.-. I
,"~': :-.~ ~~,' r l"''':) ~ H
';Jf.;:C~.-.t \~ 8 ~- ti: WuY' W ~ t::=
-....
;-_,,_0=
(\
n
RIVERSIDE STREET
.
9 8 7 6 5
c
Santa Rosa
BY
FOX&. JACOBS
HOMES.
6! ROSETTA CANYON II
Tract 25476
November 28. 2007
~
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
2C = Lots 8-11
20 = Lots 6, 7,12 & 13
2E = Lots 1-5
2F = Lots 20-25
3A = Lots 14; 18 & 19
(\
\ -(
c~'\~pnC'~~I~ ". r
k..:....t\::.t: l.; ~.o:.:.::./oJ .j C:,"r~'"
~
~",-', l~"'" "'0 '2.
r-GL;~I;;Jh i ;..HJ~" .-d.-~.~.:"c _=~o.=.
. PACE 'J, f OF l.( 0.""
e(
Ul
0
0::
l- e(
I- .. Z
(/) Z
w ~
0
U;
a:
e( w
Ul >
0 a:
0:: OIHlS\f
~
w
c
~
~
~
E--
.....
Z
.....
U
.....
>
(Q) w
.cr:
OZ
I!J!Jl zO
--
~ = ~!a
=
= wi::;
= C'....o wcl
I!J!Jl ~
~ ~l..:l
~ I- ::5~
u u..Z
I!J!Jl = oz
~ ~.~
u
W
I-
1ii
...J
W
C
o
::;;
..<
~/.;
'~
~.(1<
~v
~
on
~
EX~~HB~T_ '6 I
/ '"f 02..
u
,
;:lj
<:::>
~
:s
~
~
"t:
;:lj
<:::>
~
E:s
~
;:lj U
~
~
I.)
~
<>l:l
~
~
Eo-.
"t:
E:s
ZEo-.
O~
.~ <:::>
Z~
<I
UrJ1
<~
E--O
E--~
~f;Iil
~~ U
p,::~
(s.".-:t:;.~.,;;.;p.. "H..:~~; .'iiJ. 3
PA{)[; ~ 'lIOF l{ "
, i
, , i
, ,
, ,
, , i
, ,
, , i
I 1
1 , i
, 1
"' " i
n "' "
1 , f-
, 1
, , i
, ,
, , i
, ,
, , i
, ,
, , i
, ,
, , i
1 ,
'* i
--'-
" "
1 , i
, ,
, , i
1 ,
, , j
, 1
, , j
, ,
1 1 i
, 1 I
, 1 i
, 1
, 1
, .
n
,
I"
1
1
1
,
.
1 ,
, 1
1 1 /
:Y
-+-<'1
\~
1 1
1 '"
, ,
1 1
1 1
1 ,
, ,
1 1
1 1
, ,
, 1
1 1
, ,
1 1
1 1
~ I I
.,
1
1 1
1 ,
1 1
1 1
\ ;; I
, 1
1 1
1 ,
1 1
-\ V
"r-~
,I 1
1 1
, 1
1 1
1 ,
, ,
, 1
1 1
1 ,
, 1
1 ,
1 ,
, 1
\ \
,
1
1
,
1
I
n
.
" f
1 1
\ \
. \ "-
\ , ", \
\ '- ....."
" " \.....
'- ....., \ ....,
" " '-.)-~~"'"
......., '....., /1........ ....,....
, '..... y,.', .........
, ..... /', " "-
'" 1........" ,," ,''-- .~ -
,,<, ,'"," ',," ,---~~~-~y-
~ ',', I ---
..... .... -_ I
1.1
,j!
".!
'j
I
i
,I
llliiilllll!lllll II
_~~_mmm~~m_~m~~m
! ' ,II n
~~ ~ 5!~ i~~!
% j~ 8~5~~"~i ~
1'!!"!~i'i!:ll~5!
bw!l!llCDlI...!z..l:'!!iz~
\ '
ii. ! . ~ 11!'!1
,.1 ;,ilml!llil
~~!hg~~~~~i~i~~~3
.:!l!!llllll!!illl
~ll!!!,!;l !~'ll~,
!
~
~ ~ ~
.; ~ I
h~ "
!!!h'
mii~
@@@@@@
J
,
~
! I
il
o
f
~
ilililil
:?~~~~~~~
~!
0'
OJ
i
i
i
~i
~I
i
i
i
i ~ '
'I I < ~' I
iI. i'~'
i q 1i!~B i
~ ~ i ! I' I!;ll !
, ~ ~ '" "ij':~tllE
",I .eeeeeee
1\
I .
, \
I .
, \.
L'-.
EX~~7-
. "DIQu ~ r-
- !
~ i5 ~
~i~ ~~
"ii.lI! I'
~ i;i ~ ~gffi ,..
l>-.."'....o:;::I
!::" q 00" ~ ~
ee@@?'@@~
lli ~ w
, " llf
I_ ~ll! I':
~.'!!>"i
. ,!ill!!!
~ ~~! ~~I ~~~~
: 3~~~~ j~i ~o3~
.. ~~5og ~ffi~ ~~~~
5 i 'li!l'~l ~., ~~a~
~ e~~~ ~~~1'8~~ g~~~
. ,wow5'~'.. ""I
~ ~a~ ~~3~ ~a== 81i1~~
~ e ~ii~!!l!! ~~I ~II~
\6 I
~'t;<"
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
1
<Jl
.~
o
:=
I-\GENDA m:r,1 N~
'"
PAGE ~-T'
~j ;
'.i
-,.
.,
~11
~ ~"
o.
: ;~
..
@ W
O:::z
00
z_
= -If/
= ~-
= w2:
= '"
ll!illl 0> wO
c:<l ~t:)
i~ I- :5Z
u -
0 LLZ
OZ
~ ~~
U
<tl
'"
&
<tl
-.I
'"
Cl
"0
c::
<tl
<tl
'"
&
.l!l
c::
tl
0;
"? .Q
o
<>
~
o<l
><
&
-
<tl
.l!l
-
'"
'"
o
a::
z
o
>-
z
<(
o
~
I-
W
(j)
o
~ c:I:l
.......
C\ ~
\0 00 ~ I-<
\0 0
N 0 <+-<
N 0 .......
~ .........
c:I:l
~ U
~
d
tJ ~
(I)
I-<
~ d ~U
"'i--:> .......
~ "'i--:> (/)
\0 ~ .........
0 ~ !.r.; ~
N
M ~o (I)
~
.~ c:I:l
~ ~
'H I "'i--:> <+-<
d 0
00 >.
.....
.......
u
o:l
. I:"-
00
"<t \!l
M 0'<;)
u.)'
>~
O'
~~ U
0..<\
0.. A
-<1:.1
ACEMDA IT!", ' . ?:>
PAGE YO OF Ln;~
.,.,.
u
o
........
l:"-
N
rr ~
[hfLJ]
?o
~
""z
~2
;Z;~ U
uj2:
~a
~'"
:5=
~z
o~
~~
. ~~
c:;
=
[hfLJ]
iS2J
[hfLJ]
roc=:
(\
(C:~~~~~"w
.,,~-ux '
~I
I
=)'
=
=
I!d'dJ
~
I!d'dJ
rac==:
(\
~_l
~<21
-- <n.
"0_
W:;6
!;,ic:.>
~z
-'=;
o~
~~
~~
G
,
'-"'"""" . fI
E,~"C1 OO"'t; f!
~')':'-U=ttgcl li -;b or 5
n
,.
~
~
~
U
\0
\0
N
N
6
~
u
~
~
if1
o
~
~
<
if1
~
~
~
if1
, ,0. 3 I./(,
.,. _,:'G I OF , n
~l-'-~;~;:"'_.,.1-
EXH~B[I'- I H'
.3tp .5
~
o
-
r---
N
~
~ U
u
~
E-<
~
r:n
o
~
~
<
CZl
o
~
~
Z
<
r:n
'-l>
ClV>
u.l
~>~
.....O-.!l
0:::
~C\
<C~
--'." ?,
F;,;:,: -y'~' OF lj (P ~
.."
, '")
hGE~'~D:"~ r;T~.1 r~o. =>
P/\:::E 1.13 OF Lfro
('
('
n
."/1 '
(:;XHtB~T_ n
41'5
It
I (E=='~;~)
, ..., n r-------'.---'
~;W'I I
:;!I JI)I
. r_J
~'UJ
---
gL~
E-<
~
~
~
Cl
\0
o
C'l
r')
~
~
u
~
E-<
~
tIJ
~
~
~
tIJ
o
~
~
~
C/)
'\ - ~
'jl Cl ';'
~ [.Ll"
>':
~o~
"0:::
) 0.. '
0..'-
, '""'~
,'. oo:...L..'-l
~
~- 0
~
~
<
r--
00
"<t
~
Z
0
~
u U
~
f-<
~
r/J
~
E-<
<
<
r/J
0
~
-<
~
r/J
1- II '
F'-"\- .' n nITS,:.:, n'. - n __
'1k)\:H-e2 i::x. u _
5'15
"
O'i'
w<(
>.
O~
~
0-.'4
~~
-- - - -, : \'J.
;;':'"'.:_.0'''4 \A Of lffp '"
, }j..",.....'--~
(\
n:
-<.-
(\
C1TYOF~ .
LAKE 6LSiNO~
" ~. I . ,
~~... DREAM EXTREME.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
DRAFT CONDITIONS.
RE: Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No. I
For "Santa Rosa" by Centex Homes (Tract 25476)
I hereby state that IfWe acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval .for the above
named project. IfW e understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree
to aCcept and abide by all finM conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff,
as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project
approval.
All . final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to th~ first
Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the
approval of the Director of Community Development of the City of Lake Elsinore. The
decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the
decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
Date: \'() 1;1.7/ '\:i'K '
Applicant's Signature: 1:J~...~ ~~V~)
Print Name: ~",p . fl,\D-~' "5'V-at'(\
Address: \:lCnS CN'"O"",-Q~,,,""e..C+
r,",,""<:><\o. \c.Aqd-.~7'l
Phone Number: q 5 \ -<-\ -r "t - 'I :>D "I
AGENDP. iTE;,l NO.
PAGE 11 5
il<
o2tfn
~
Notice of Determination
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(951)674-3124
(951)471-1419 fax
(In compliance with Section 21152
of the Public Resou,rces Code)
u
Filed With: 0
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
I2SI
County Oerk of Riverside County
2724 Gateway Drive
Riverside, CA 92507
Project Title:
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No.1, Santa Rosa by Centex Homes @
Rosetta Canyon, Tract Map. No. 25476
State Oearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Oearinghouse): NI A
Lead Agency Contact: Carole K. Donahoe, Ala, Project Planner
Telephone No: (951) 674-3124 x 287
Project Location (include County):.
County of Riverside, Gty of Lake Elsinore.
The project site is located on th~ south side of Riverside Street, east of State 'Highway 74, and west of Steele Valley Road
(APNs 349-240-001; 349-420-001 and-002;and 349-430-006, -007, and -008). '
Project Description: The applicant requests to amend a previously approved residential project known as Santa Rosa bi I
Centex Homes @ Rosena Canyon. The amendment, replaces the existing Santa Rosa products with approved produc~
currently being offered at "Fox &Jacobs at Rosetta Canyon." These products will be constructed on the~remaining 22 vacant
~~~~~~~~~ .
This is- to advise that the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission (Lead Agency) has approved the above
project and has made the following detemiinations regarding the above described project: '
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No. 1 does not propose substantial changes to the Ramsgate
Specific Plan for which various environmental documents have been adopted, most recently Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2007-01. No new significant environmental effects or an increase in severity of previously identified
significant effects are anticipated. No substantial changes have, occurred with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken that, would require major revisions to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No new information of
substantial importance has come forward with respect to significant effects or alternative mitigation measures that have
not been addressed in the design of this project.
The Planning Commission has determined that Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment No. 1 implements
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-01, and the Mitigation Measures adopted thereto. Therefore, in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and pursuant to Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative
Declarations, of said Act, the Planning Commission has determined that, no further environmental documentation for
Residential Design Review No. 2006-05 Amendment NO.1 is necessary.
Signed:
Tom Weiner
Title: Acting Director of Community Development
u
ACEN~:~~Eq~O.
?
Of <..fro _
CITY OF ....~
AAI(B ~6,LSiNO~
V DREAM E,XTREMEN
(\
(\
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
"
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION .',
FROM: TOM WEINER
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUN,TY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: NOVEMBER 4,2008
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
FOR DE LA ROSA BY CENTEX HOMES, VESTING TRACT MAP NO.
32503
APPLICANT
& OWNER: JANE BLASINGHAM, REPRESENTATIVE FOR CENTEX HOMES, 1265
CORONA POINT COURT, CORONA,.CALlFORNIA 92879
,
,
Proiect Reauest
The applicant requests to amend a previously approved residential project known as De
La Rosa by Centex Homes, The amendment consists of a proposal to replace the
existing De La Rosa products with approved products currently being offered at "Fox
and Jacobs at Rosetta Canyon" that are also Centex Homes products. These products
will be constructed on the remaining thirty-six (36).vacant lots within the sixty (60) lot De.
La Rosa Vesting Tract Map No. 32503.
Proiect Location
Amendment No. 1 for' Residential Design Review No, 2006-18 straddles Riverside
Street and is west of Laister Road and east of Crumpton Street (APN's 349-610-006
thru 018, 349-611-001 thru 004, and 349-612-001thru 022).
hca::n=r\ ITe::; ~i0.
Lf
Gi-'7r
PACE
I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
Environmental SettinQ
(lfJ~tl~~Jffi"""
hNl~~~;.
Project
Site
North
South
East
West
u
Vacant
~*-J'~mlt'l.Gj~till?t!!t$J~tq,~{t!li,~~ b.~0:I9J!il.~l~ifl~r~JIi ~Gg~.~~~~8J~N~;~~i:lilf;1.'l;~
Low Medium Density
Scattered Single Family
Residential
Vacant and Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residential
Vacant and Single Family
Residential
Proiect BackQround
R-1, Single Family
Residential
R-1, Single Family
Residential
MD, Medium
Densi Residential
MD, Medium
Densi Residential
R-1, Single Family
Residential & R"3
High Density
Residential
Low Medium Density
Ramsgate Specific Plan
Ramsgate Specific Plan
Low Medium Density and
Medium High Density
The project site had undergone several City processes starting in June, 2004. At that .
time Centex Homes requested approval of Annexation No. 71, General Plan
Amendment No. 2004-09, Pre-Zoning No. 2004-04, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
32503, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-09. The City Council approved U
these requests at a regularly scheduled meeting of December 14, 2004. The request
for Annexation was sent to the Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) for approval. The annexation was conditionally approved by LAFCO upon the
submittal of a neighboring Annexation No. 77 in order to close a "pocket" area that was
created by the annexation for the area currently known as the North Peak Specific Plan.
Centex could not proceed with the development of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
32503 until this condition was met.
In compliance with LAFCO's request, Annexation No. 77 was submitted to LAFCO on
October 25, 2006 and accepted pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2006-162 on
January 10, 2007. The product types proposed were previously approved by the
Director of Community Development on June 29, 2006. The project was identified as
Santa Rosa at Rosetta Canyon (Tract No. 25476).
Residential Design Review No. 2006-18 for Vesting Tract Map No. 32503 now identified
as De La Rosa was administratively' approved by the Director of Community
Development on June 27, 2007. To date, twenty-four (24) of the sixty (60) lots have
been constructed with the De La Rosa (a.k.a. Santa Rosa) product.
Centex provided an opportunity for existing residents of both the Santa Rosa and De La
Rosa tracts to view the proposed changes in product types at an Open House
Page 2 of 5
u
''''"''D' ,--.,. .'~ Y-
K""'. "'I'......,'
_ .r'\ I _.., ..~...,.
PAGE ?- c;..~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
n
conducted on September 17, 2008. Only one resident attended the Open House and
had only positive remarks for Centex homes.
Proiect Description
(\.
The proposed Amendment to the Residential Design Review consists of the following
elements: 1) Plotting Plan; 2) Elevations and Floor Plans and 3) Phasing Plan. A Model'
Home Complex that is currently being used for Fox and Jacobs at Rosetta Canyon will
be used for the De La Rosa project. A SitePlanifor the Model Complex is included in .
this sub~ittal as well as the previously approved L,andscape Plans.
The applicant will be providing six (6) products,;'each with either three (3) or four (4)
different elevations to choose from. These units will be constructed on the remaining
thirty-six (36) lots within the De La Rosa tract A single story plan was previously offered
and will be offered again. The remaining five (5) products are two story units. The
details of these six (6) new units are: '
'Plan 1 - 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 2 car garage @, 1 ,640 sq. ft .
Plan 2 - 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, 2 car garage w/opt 3'd @1,979 sq. ft.
Plan 3 - 3 bedrooms, bonus room, 2 Y, bath, 2 car garage w/opt 3'd @ 2,400 sq. ft.
Plan 4 - 5 bedrooms 3 bath, 2 car garage w/opt 3'd @ 2,613 s2' ft.
Plan 5 - 4 bedrooms, family room, 3 bath, 2 car garage w/opt. 3' , @ 2,710 sq. ft.
The existing De La Rosa projeCt provides four (4)iproducts with four (4)elevations each
that include one (1) single story plan and three '(3) two (2) story plans (see attached .
"Previously Approved Plans"). The sizes of these units are 2,266 sq. ft., 2,710 sq. ft.,
3,206 sq. ft. and 3,487 sq. ft. The plans offered three (3) and four (4) bedrooms in the
two (2) smaller plans and five (5) bedrooms in the two (2) larger plans.
Analysis
Staffs compared the De La Rosa products with the Fox and Jacobs products and found
that they equal or exceed the architectural features of the existing De La Rosa products.
Although the square footage of the proposed Fox 'and . Jacobs products are smaller than
the existing De La Rosa plans, the largest ot the .,ew plans still offer a maximum of five,
(5) bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms and an optional three car garage. Staff feels that the ~,'
street view will be substantially similar since the architectural styles and colors and '
materials of the Fox and Jacobs products will blend with the architectural styles and
colors and materials of the De La Rosa development The amended project will
continue to provide the same fencing and landscaping materials that was previously
approved. The project meets all of the LEMC requirements including maximum
allowable density, setbacks, parking, and design. The six products that include a single
story unit and two story units provide for a good diyersity of choices for the home buyer.
(\
Page3of5 .
AG~}!Dh iT~:;~ r~o.
PAGE .,
If
o;,l~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
Environmental Determination'. .
u
f (,'
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No 2004-09 was prepared for the subdivision
map known as Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 32503. VTTM is the underlining
map for this Design Review. The MND was adopted by City Council on December 14,
2004. The MND was. prepared pursuant to Article 6, Negative Declaration Process,
Section 15070, Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Review was in anticipation of the current
Design Review development considering densities up to 6 dwelling units per acre.
,. .
Residential Design Review No.' 2006-18, Amendment No. 1 does not propose
substantial changes to Vesting Tract Map No. 32503 for which the Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2004-09 was prepared. No new significant environmental effects or an
increase in severity of previously identified. significant effects are anticipated. No
substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which. the
project is undertaken that would require major revisions to the. Mitigated Negative
Declaration. No new information of substantial importance has come forward with
respect to significant effects or alternative mitigation meas.ures that have not been
addressed in the design of this project.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that Residential Design
Review No. 2006-18, Amendment NO.1 is consistent with .andimplements Mitigated U
Negative Declaration No. 2004-09 for Vesting Tract Map No. 32503. Therefore, in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) and pursuant to
Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, of said Act,Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission determines that no further environmental
documentation for R~sidential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment NO.1 is
necessary.
According to the MSHCP Consistency Determination that was completed for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 32503 and approved by the City Council on December 14, 2004,
the Vesting Map was found to be consistent with all of the required procedures, policies,
anClguidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolutions and Section 6.0 Plan Wide
Requirements of the MSHCP. This amended design review is a. minor change to a
.' ,
design review that was reviewed in connection with the December 14,' 2004 consistency
determination and does' not present new circumstances, impacts, or information. No
new or different disturbance or activity will occur.. Therefore, no further analysis is
required for Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment No.. 1.
Page 4 of5
U
ACEf-lDA ITEM r~o. 4-
PACE \.f- O;:."'l L
I
n
(I
n
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RDR 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Planning Commission recommend To City Council to adopt a
Resolutiqn approving Residential Design Review f\lo. 2006-18, Amendment No.1.
Prepared By:
Linda M. Miller, Project Plann€JjjP
TomWeiner,~
Acting Director of Community Development
Approved By:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Resolution No. 2008-_ approving Residential Design Review No. 2006-18,
Amendment NO.1
3. Conditions of Approval
4. Exhibits - Reductions
a. Site/Plotting Plan
b. Typical Landscaping
c. Model Complex Plan
d. Building Elevations and Floor Plans
e. Phasing Plan
f. Elevation Colors
g. Previously approved De La Rosa Plans
5. Draft Acknowledgement of Conditions
6. Draft Notice of Determination
Page 50f 5
ACENDA lTEr,J NO. L{-
PACE 5 OF~
VICINITY MAP
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2006-18, AMENDMENT 1
FOR DE LA ROSA
APN 349-612-001 THRU 022,349-611-001 THRU 009,349-610-001
THRU 018, and 349-600:'001 THRU 015
u
,
\ I
I I
0,
~I
z'
31
~
I ,
j ~//
/
/
/ fJ.
s~_1
MAURICIO ST '. b.
. ~. _ ., I .~-~-::~~1 /
: I . /. _m- I
ii" / ..~
) \// /:1 j
! I v' "I
, / I
.___ / // J I
,/// - ._............__ _ __.....i... _ _ ,
I/------i
---"'-1
1,/
i
I
'-. . ,".-
. I---~~--
f
" T--
I
,EST ,~ ._~~ U
'I r -, ]\""~ I,'=TJ' '...BI AI N1TR1 y' BI=A.......~ Sr'T""r' "'I' "".,:,".'
L~-~!-f-=j, \ \ 10 , . ,J ~ .
TlIL>>:':'r~ I'c-"'e-" ....~ I~-:' (-~'i
",~ ./\, (/),~ ~. =....,..~ 1--
~;I'~~'r\ \ V<l:: I-'~i I_i_~! I-f'
I, i~,'\r~1'r~.:/ /'l=~l F[,.-! ~}:~
ELLEIISISCT! ...j /'., ,-! 1'.,-, r-{~ '
1"__"-"1---~--T-\---;-::-~./_j:'"l,">/ ,('O'-'ji.::t/ t'--_.~/ \...-..... .,
11 \ \ _ L\ ./ ) /" ';/'" "I/.,~_"'" ~- / ..,>;:;,-_.J..... '
IIIIlIIII I j__,"\ I'~r'''-,./ "f-.., i r' -I. ~ i '.". /. /....
. ,.-....-.- i 'I : , j' ,I r..~.~..) '.z i -.,): ~ ,. __ _ /"\_ \
OSESACHEUN!"C~ (J;;! :-;:\/\\;,
---""-'1, (-"-'."-L~~_~---: [~'~J----!Y t'---'--/--'-~~'-.j~,! \. /'Y'<
.'It I ' ,~~'--" 1:5' /" ) .
,-J}~/L=j [=;~ r~}>/ '
-'C(:/A: /'j i'I'~j !"-
.. "VIS "f-. (/) .
i~'( <>4</,/ r
l-- Of: f i j ,
i,-\,}9 {tl/)1
I
I
PROJECT SITE
PLANNING COMMISSION
u
AGEN~:d;f"ci ~.
4-
OF -rq-
('\
(\
j
(\
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ ' .,
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REeOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'OF LAKE ELSINORE, APPROVAL
OF . RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2006-18, AMENDMENT
NO.1
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes (the "Developer':) requesting approval of Residential Design Review
No. 2006-18, Amendment No, 1 (the "Amended Design Review") for a revised product
"De La Rosa" proposed for the remaining' thirty six (36) lots in Tract Map No. 32503;
and, ' :.
WHEREAS, the project straddles Riverside Street and is west of Laister Road
and east of Crumpton Street (APN's 349-610-006.thru018,. 349-611-001 thru 004, and
349-612-001 thru 022) (the "Site"); and
WHEREAS, the Amended Design Reviewiincludes design details for thirty-six
(36)lots including a model home complex located'off site on Carla Court; and
- y ,~.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of ~he City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of considering and making recommendations to the
City Council pertaining to residential projects; and, . . .
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub.
Res. Code SS 21000,et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQAGuidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000
et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged toreducedelay.and paperwork
associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared. documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the .proposed: project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
:\
,/.
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 151.62(a) states that "When an EIR has
been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall
be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
1. Substantial changes are proposed.in. the project which will require
major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
. ,
2.
Substantial changes occur with ,respect to the circumstances under.
which the project is undertaken ,which will require major revisions of '
the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of "
new significant environmental effects ora substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or
AGENDA ITEr,; NO. 4-
PAGE '( OF '1 '-f
3.
New information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence
at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative
. declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(8) . Significant effects previously examined will be substantially
. more severe than shown in. the previous EIR;.
(C) Mitigation measures oralternati~es previouslY founpnot to be .
feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially
reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably
. different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative."; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared for Mitigated Negative Declaration.
No. 2004-09 (the "MND") and a Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted thereto, on
December 14, 2004, for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32503. The MND analyzed
the subdivision and grading of property and the construction of sixty. (60) single-family
residential lots, of which this Amended Design Review is a part.
WHEREAS, public notice of the Amended Design Review has been given, and
the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented. by the.. Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on November 4, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, THEPLANNING,COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND. ORDER
AS FOLLOWS: .
SECTION 1. ,The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design
for the remaining -thirty-six (36) residential homes and model complex prior to making a
decision and has found them acceptable.
. -
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in
accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the Amended Design Review does
not present a substantial change or new information that would require further CEQA
analysis. The environmental impacts associated with development of the Amended
Design Review were contemplated by; fully. analyzed in, and mitigated through the
AGEr~ul!t nE~)i i-~O.
PAGE e
u
u
u
If
OF "\ '-t
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. 32503. No new CEQA
('\ documentation is necessary for the Amended Design Review.
SECTION 3.. That.in accordance with Section 17.82 of the City of Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, the Planning' Commission makes the following findings for the
approval of Amended Design Review:
1. The project as conditioned will comply with the goals and objectives of the City
of Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is
located.
The General Plan designates the site for .Low Medium Density Residential (6
dwelling units per acre) and the Amended Design Review implements this
density. '" .
The Zoning District on the site is R-1 Single Family Residential, and the
Amended Design Review complies with all development standards of this zone.
2. Theproject complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060
and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
(\
The proposed "Fox and Jacobs" product types equal or exceed the product
types currently being offered at the De La Rosa project site. The "Fox and
Jacobs" products offer similar architectural styles, features, colors and
materials. The applicant will provide the same fencing and landscaping
materials that are currently being used in. the De La Rosa project. Therefore,
the merging of the previously approved products and the newly proposed "Fox
and Jacobs" products will blend togethei'creating anundetectaple, seamless
unification of product types. . .
3. Conditions.and safeguards pursuant to Seqtion 17.82.070, including guarantees
. and evidence of compliance with. conditior:Js, have been inco~porated into the
approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in
accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which.
the site is located. .
.,
Ii
Conditions have been applied to the Amended Design Review that prescribe
site design, setbacks, height, architectural design, exterior materials, colors,
textures, landscaping, lighting, walls and fences, grading and phasing. .
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the
attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that
the City Council approve Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment No.1.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
n
[;GE;oz;J.;:-; [TG1~ :~0.
PkDE 'f
If
OF,r
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this fourth day of November 2008.
Axel Zanelli, Chairman _-
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner .
Acting Director of Community Development
..,.
:r
-,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
.)ss. -
)
~
I, TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Community Development of the City of
Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. - 2008- was adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the
4th day of November 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: -
AYES:
NOES:
,';':
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
,.
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
ACE.{DA ITE.;j ;'iO.
PACE I 0
u
u
u
4
01" "l~.
o
GENERAL
CONDITIONS OF ApPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL. DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18, AMENDMENT NO.1
DE LA ROSA BY CENTEX HOMES, VESTING TRACT NO. 32503
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action,or
proceeding against the City, its Officials, Office'rs, Employees or Agents to attach, set
aside,void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or .
legislative body concerning the Residential Design Review projects attached hereto.
i "
PLANNING DIVISION
2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2006-18,Amendment NO.1 will
lapse and be void two (2) years following the date on which the Design Review became
effective unless: (1) prior to the expiration of two (2) years a building permit related to the
Design Review is issued and construction commenced and. diligently pursued toward
completion, or (2) prior to the expiration of two (2) years, the applicant has applied for and
has been granted an extension of the Design Review approval. An extension may be
granted for no more than two (2) years, one (1) y~ar at a time subject to the approval of the
Director of Community Development. An application for a time extension and required fee
shall be submitted a minimum of one (1) month prior to the expiration date.
03.
The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office
within five (5) business days from the approval of this Design Review Amendment by the
Planning Commission. A check in the amount of $64.00 payable to Riverside County shall
be forwarded to the Planning Division by the appliyant for this purpose.
,
4. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations
and site plans for the Residential Design Review.'
5. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval,
and those provisions and requirements contained in the Municipal Code, subject to
approval by the Community Development Director or designee.
6. The applicant shall meet all Americans iNith Disabilities Act requirements for access to the
Model Home Complex.
7. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches
above any earth surface.
8. The applicant shall provide a flat concrete padr or area a minimum of '3'- 0" by 7'- 0"
adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the CitY trash barrels. The storage pad or area
shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community
(\
Page I of II
AGENDA ITEM NO.
pN~"._LL....I"'"
4
...llf
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSET A CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
u
Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location .of the
aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units.
9. The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed. near the
entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant
shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit.
10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance.
Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the
provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim
erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as
approved by the City Engineer.
11. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
12.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during
construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee.
13. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to
issuanceof building permit.
14. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to
the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards.
u
'. .
15. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards
for fire protection.
16.AII mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall.be ground mounted. All
outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location
and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. Utility company
meters may be excluded from this requirement.
17.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception
that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
18.AII theme walls are required to be coated with anti-graffiti paint. All wood fencing shall be.
painted or treated with a high-grade solid body, penetrating stain approved by the Director
of Communjty Development or designee.
Page 2 of 11
u
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4-
PAGE Id- OF ~
(\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
19.Any retaining walls visible to the public shall match the interior masonry split face block
walls in colors and style. . ,
20. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for
two cars for a total interior clear space of 20"x 20',.'
21. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and
construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before
7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday.' Construction activity shall
not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
22. The applicant shall pay all appropriate City fees.
23. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site
identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that
complaints regarding the operation 'can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code
Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. .
Prior to :Issuance of Grading/Building Permits.
/"""\ 24. Prior to B~i1ding Permi~~ the Construction Supe,rvisor shall meet with Planning Division
( , Staff to review the Conditions of Approval. .' .: . .
25. Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign
and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions;' and shall return the executed original to
the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records.
26. These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to
issuance of building permit. f.
27. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscapingllrrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted prior"to
issuance of building permit. Plans shall be approved by the City's Landscape Architect
Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to Certificate of
Occupancy. .
.., ','
28. All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic
(manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage
using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final
landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's. Landscape
Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape
Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's .
fee plus 40 percent.
n
Page 3 orH .
f;GE:'Hj;'. rrG~'l ~~O. Lf
PADE. 13 m: I~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
u
a. The applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree list, at
a maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 24-inch box in size.
. '. ,
b. Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than. 36 inche~.
c. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, .and trees and meet
all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to
the use of Xeriscape or drought. resistant plantings with combination drip
irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering.
d. All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100. percent .Faithful
Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of
Occupancy.
e. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any
phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building.
1. The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot
plan.
g. The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details..
u
29.AII exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within
private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation .installed,
as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
30. The applicant shall prepare a Wall and Fencing Plan for the area comprising of the project
area, in compliance with the fencing standards within the Zoning Code Section 17.14.130.D
prior to issuance of any building permit, and subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director or designee.
Prior to Final Approval .
31. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy and release of utilities.
32.Applicant shall provide a .copy of the. recorded CC & R's prior to the first Certificate of
Occupancy.
33. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain project improvements and facilities including
the private drainage improvements, common areas, and landscaping as approved by
Page 4 of 11
u
AGEN~;;:!:1Y~, OF
If
""1t[
('.
CONDITIONS OF APP~OVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
Community Services Director and the Director of Community Development of Designee.
The .2 acre "remainder parcel" shall be included within the jurisdiction of the Homeowner's
Association (HOA).
34. Prior to finalappr6val all wood fencing shall be painted or treated with a high-grade solid
body, penetrating stain approved by the Community Development Director or his.designee.
35.AII front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped and irrigated with
an automatic ,tmderground irrigation system to provide 100% plant and. grass coverage
using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
36.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if
the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as
. determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading
plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and
flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
('.
37. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map
of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall
be subject to the review and approval of the CitY Engineer.
38.AII grading shall be done under the supervision:of a geotechnical erigineer and he shall
. certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control.
39. This project shall comply with applicable Conditions of Approval of Tract 32503.
40.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. .
41.Arrangements for relocation of utility company fa~ilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead
utilities shall be undergrounded.
42. Underground water rights. shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions .of
Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with' the City's agreement with the Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District. "
43. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at
locations to be determined by the City Engineer.
44. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department.
n
Page 5 of 11. .
t~GENDt'4. iTEl51 ~~Q.
PA~E t ~
Lf
01' I y.-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
()
45.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF,
MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees.
46. Ten (10) year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year-storm runoff
shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded,
drainage facilities shall be provided.
47.AII drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control
District Standards.
48.AII compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 y," x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final
inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved.
49. Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be. maintained by a homeowner's
association or other maintenance mechanism as approved by the City.
50.AII open space and slopes (except for public parks and schools) and flood control facilities
outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association.
51.Alllandscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distal)ce Standards.
()
52.AII waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning,
demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction.shall be.disposed of at
appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling
and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling
vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for
bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not 'usingCR&R Inc. for recycling
services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the
applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of
tonnage by certified weigh master tickets.
53. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property
owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement.
54.AII natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be
collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
55. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs
should drain to a landscaped area.
Page 6 of 11
u
ACENDA 11[:r" NO.
PAGE I b
'-I
OF
ilf
n
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
56. The applicant shall submit WQMP and SWPPP plans for. City's.review and approval. - "
57. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents
of the development in the use of herbicides,'. pesticides, fertilizers as well as other
environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that
contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement
"An in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management. Plan. (Required for lot of
. one acre or more)
58;Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas
and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more)
59. City of Lake' Elsinore has adopted ordinances fo~' storm water management and discharge
control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances
prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This
includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other-
waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water ,Pollution, What You 'Should Know"
describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. .
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into:: street, gutters, .storm drain system, .or
r'\ waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly
r .' prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal:law..' , ,,' ,
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
60. Streets with a slope greater than 9% shall be redesigned to 9% or less, unless .approved
by the City Engineer.
,
.1 _
61. Maintenance access shall be provided to all open spaces and drainage facilities and
-easements.
62.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and .traffic improvement plans and
specifications for the street improvements as shown on the Site Plan, grading plan,. or as
i conditions of this. development. Improvements 'I shall 'be designed and constructed to
Riverside County Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street
improvement plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, ac pavement and
drainage improvements. '
63. Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these
conditions or as shown on the Site Plan. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free
and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City.
n
Page70fll
AGENDA iT",;l NO. 4
PAOE---LL-O;: -, '1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503) .
u
64.Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements. All
signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of
public improvements. The signing and striping shall include Street Name Signs, No Parking
and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. .; '.
~, ",
..'
65. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Reports prepared
by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer: The. grading plans shall
include mitigation/protection of any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by
development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. The grading plan shall also show that
no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections in order
to meet sight distance standards:
66.Construction Project access and hauling route plan shall be submitted and'approved by the
. City Engineer,
67. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations.
. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. '
68.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake
faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site.
1'"
69. The applicant shall '~btain all necessary off-site easements and/or' permits for off-site. U
grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading
permit issuance.
70. Applicant to provide' erosion control measures as part. of their grading plan. The applicant. .
shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals. of the BMP in
Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
71. Applicant shall provide the City with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of.
grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which
describes BMP's .that will be implemented for the development including maintenance
. responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the Gity for review and approval.
~. .) ~ ,. ,
72. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Notice of Intent, approved WQMP plan and
SWPPP plans.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit.
Page 8 of II
U
ACENDA ITFJ,1 r~o.
PAGE I~
4
OF "1 '-L
(\
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR .
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18 .
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
73. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water
. agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made. for this project and
specify the technical data for the water service atthe location. such as water pressure and
volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying fOf'a building permit
74. Provide proof that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located at intersections and
street curves that could compromise sight distance requirements.
~ ' ,
75. WQMP and erosion control plans shall be in place to the satisfaction of the City EngineeL
.
76. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check fees (LEMC
.16.34).
Prior to Occupancy
77. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroabhment permit issued by the Engineering
Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83~78). All
fees. and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of
Occupancy. " :,'
78.AII compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 1/2" x 11," Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final
inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. ..
(\
,: ,
79.AII public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as
conditions of this development and/or Tract 32503, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as
specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements shall include
street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements
, related to the project:, '
i.
80.AII signing and striping. and traffic control devices shall be installed. This-includes Street
Name Signs, No Parking and Street ,Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract,
:1' )"
81. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District
requirements. . ..
(\
Page 9 of 11
i\GET~Vft\ rr=~:;t rJo.
PA::;E I ~ OF
If
1'1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANYON (TRACT NO. 32503)
u
84. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the
Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. .
85. Post construction erosion controls and landscaping shall be installed and approved by the
: City Engineer.
86. The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall as-built the mylars. A digital copy of all
completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond (amount to be. determined
by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement.
,'" ,
'- , ;
87. Prior to occupancy, the grading plans shall be revised to reflect the "as built" construction
and/or grading of the project. (Added to Amendment No. 1 of RDR 2006-18)
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
88.Annex into CFD 2003-1
Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit
or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public'
safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a four
thousand two hundred dollar ($4,200) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the U
annexation process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900
x334 or danderson@hards-assoc.com. : ,
89. Annex into CFD 2006-5 . ,
Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit'or
building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex' into the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District 2006-5 to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the neiN parks,
parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and
federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project."
Applicant shall make a four thousand two hundred dollar ($4,200) non-refundable deposit to
cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at
(949) 655-3900 x334 or danderson@harris-assoc.com. .
;' ..
90. Annex into LLMD NO.1
Prior to approval of the Final. Map: Parcel Mapi Site DevelopmentPlan, Special Use Permit or
building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and' Landscape
Maintenance District NO.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public
right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the' City and 'for
street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will. pay for electricity and a
maintenance fee to Southern Califomia Edison. Applicant shall make a four thousand seven
Page 10 of II
U
PAGE a- c>
It
OF r If
AGENDA iTcrJ~ ~.~O.
n
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-18
DE LA ROSA AT ROSSETA CANypN (TRACT NO. 32503)
hundred doilar ($4,700) non-refundable depositto'cover the cost of the annexation process.
Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900 x334 or dandersonlalharris-
assoc.com.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
91. The applicant shall comply with all conditions and standards.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
92. The applicant shall comply with all. Riverside County Fire Department conditions and
standards. .
LAKE ELSINORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
93. Meet all the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Poljce Department.
End of Conditions
('\
n
Page II of II
AGENDA iTW i~O.~
PACE ;;>.\ Or- i\..f
:ce:
~
rtcw)
~o~
~lt)c
Ci)~a:
~""-~
~o....
~~~
~I:Q
~
"
;
,
,
~ h 1 10 A I ~ i l i
t= j!!' I , j!l. I I ~ ; ~ . I "
'! '~' , ! 'I'! , .. .. , I I
. ,," ,.. 'I" I,' I" 'I'
f 1 ~ J"....~' It It - 5 I ~
Ii tl'lr ~ ii lll!r ~ ~~ I l!I'I~l i~ll;{l !~~ ! 'Ii :
~! ~.-i I ~I t!i : ~~s i .. .t.. .!..!id . ~; II
~.~ ;;11 ~~. ;;1' ;'~! .l::!~h~~hn3hi! 11!~.:1
t:i!li;;!i ;bli;;~i ;ih i~. ,SIU.
;;;:~!jl.~h.illi!.h..~~11~ i ' I
!:::!\i ~jj:1 f ~.i !;;_Il ~~i i 0 Ii" .;
~"II!i lllt! ! I'~a 1'IhJ ~ i.. j U II' Ii i i!"
~ "'11 .. t .'1 ~ ! ~ ~
-.I ..: h',~! I ..~ l,r,l~ I JI!I ! f... ~d 1,:1' ~illflt!;n!i.J:(:
" .8." ... ~I""'l!;d' "~l ~~tl--" I 'I.
g III h:lleli! i.:lee !:;ll 5, IIIi , I: b ~ Iii. 21~~~:~~~1!:~
',~:~ ..;;
-.'_J !!
l~ml
~ud~
./
~ ~
<:il!!,
- '"
il;,!'
.dO
,
I:
.j,(~i
t:111
~i~!1
iih!l
i
~ II!
~il"
"lilt
\\ "\ :-',\ //
\ \ ").,/....
\' \-
,
.,
\:..;,./
\ \ \':' W
'"\ 0::...
~to----'-O
"\ \-r-. ~
:",I';!. ~
lp w
'fl'rr;'"r-
:tuij
~'-_._-.-1.C.'----'.'-
,it .0
:1) -t
;+"'--b--"
I =
,
,
-I
"
i;
lfl
;;-
i~!.
xh
~I~
~.;
u!t~
~ .,,1
::!! ~':',!.1iI
~u~~~
~::!:~:.~-
...;a:r~!
",~a""i
"''''.oi;j!l
~-:Z~1I~
i~~~n
. I
," }\.,g
I
"
I
'..----.H
"
"
II
--n
/I
/I
/I
-+1
/I
/I
/I
....IJ\
/I
/I
/I
i'
i,.
"
"
Ii
/I
"
"
"
,
o
.
~ ~
--'~
~5
..;t.~~
.--o::g\:;
~r
0:3
o
u
I
,
~ .'" ~
---eo.
--~-'.;s;
, ""z
"-,J.--o;\
i l. OF"" . ~
:JI! ...., I
L.:~. - --,.
IL-2266
p_""u
fl.'....11
"
Z
-) ~
Z
o
>
>
~
.
~~
~b
8~
>"
" ..
~~
~~
-T
47
't~.........
0,.'
.
1
I ~i '~~=-=i
1 1,,,., i
i._ . .
111.-~.i!'.AI
1 A."".
~I '.' '\
. .
.
.
,
'" ~ ! ~~
! -l'I'" ,
!Ill U,jj ,
ill Ii im!! ,I
i ~b; :l!
; 'I " "
! i. ~ii! 1I
i. 'i ',I-Ill. 'I
6 "'Ii":!ij i ~ ..
til B; ~~~ ~lI!~zi~; ii
~ ill ~n L~ n ~J
lj Z.il1l1".<r_
~" 0 0(11
~ ~ ~ 0)
l
:
I
i li.. i ~
~.. ~~I' I . . ,
.. ~,. Ii: I ;: I -i
" ".',' !! Iii 1 ,
" "'/,. ~~h ~ :$ ~ ~
1;!.IMlhiil! I. ! i Ii
J !I i< I E ~i
,j! I, 'I'.H!
~g I ,I! II rl' i.'1 ,!
.1 I li'qi';;t .1
lll!!s!jill,li'j/ld H'I !!
ll~ih~ h J~ ~ i~ ~~ _M
~b' I D
<II ~ ~ I
l~'c'i_
. ,
11
u
g
'", '::2:
"I .cb. -~,
- 'c, - -NCD ""I
\ Ii; ~...
~. '~. r~- ~
I ~ ~ .'
- ~ ~
~ . '~-'
'- N
.
1
1
1
1/,1
'I
i I~
I! .
I~
I~
I~
Ii
1
1
1
- 1
- <I
-.
z
o
"
<
~
,
~ ~
~ ~
~~~
Iii
0._
,
~
~
>
>
~
~
"
~?
0:;
u~
>.
".
~~
.U
..
....:;
~ ~ ~
:; :
" ;
"
< -
."
~:
" ,
" "
, -.
, -.
o :~
><::
~..v.;.
u;::
IWI
<r:
U)
o
~
~
~
~
a
('/')
o
LO
N
('/')
E-<
U
~
~.
E-<
~
~
-<
:z: ~ ~
<r: ,., ffi ~ t'-,
I'. ...J:>; 00" ~
5 . "" p. -<!:::3'"
,i~l ,~~! i~ ffil~ ~ ~ ~
. "~I "'1 .. pU z ~ 00 ~ ~
!'l!! ! ", il " :<!;: 0 -< ~
q~~A: : ~~~ ~s ~ 0 w ~ ~ ~
'!Ui ! l!~ :1 <J::
!,..; ','!. !; U '" g
""I "'l '" CfJ 0 ~
~K!l~ Hi..,- >-:t .:0 "lli r"'\ ;;; &.
io~:~ 9d~ ~~ a~~ ~ _ ~
;;%....~x ~z~~!!i~ !ll:~ :z: ~ ~
,,!,~ "'-i, 'j- 0 ~
',iI, ii"" !., ..... ~ '"-
llil;::~~ H!~~;:g ~~~ ~ ~ .... ::g
~~~~", ~~ ~~~ :s~~ a ~ ~ <<(
l=~ =, .,~~ ~~2 ~ ~
: !Z 0; 15 .. -l!' >:; 1<, ill< ~:s!, J.tl '"
l<O,,:; ~""$! "ii!l"3~ 1--1 0 '-'
".~' "" , ",....... z "
:l~~-,~ ~~~~i<~ 5~!~: ~ <( W lfl
~I!;~~~ 5~"~~:i ::z n:~ "'.... -<
"!~' :'!'" "i" " z ~ ~
"-'! ",,/, "'". .. , 5 ~"'
ielh HihLlilii GJ ~ ~ ~ ~
!!!!ii'Hi~~i1!.i! U ~ ~ ~ b
. !~W!'i' i!illm1!~Umllo:Z: ~p e ~ g
". .!\\~~ 1i'NiJ.~rG"1.;"( ~':eJ@ 8
<"'_v....~..,5li!1a~
gi~A~~~ 0 c~ ~ .
: ;
'.......'.-' , ,'1/' I
.f-:,~I~ ~ ~ ~ ' WI!'
r-l p:f tr '} -m1,
Y'lr __-"""-_ ~~ !1!P, I I
'>-~ ~~~I"':'~I~ 'b"1 : I' l
e- I" I",l..~' I '
~ 1,1 1!l(j3, "
~.,., "j -:. " I';] ,I".
''-c.-J il. ,I ~, 'I" ~,
;"~_ ,~: 'I' 11.,b 11.1
;' ,~ l:'~;r "fr '~!~ ' I ~'
J~ I" :.iT i II n:'=1 I il
0D' "j lEf I ~ ' :ii ~! ~': I
~r _~~I..I ~1l1 ' : ~i
I >~ T \ , ~ II! , : II
~ ~ A' I 'I
ic.o c:t1lj ,~. · i I
~-.:.. '--~Jd 1 ~~?~-=-J~ - j
hk ,:t:~S~~I' i
!.:t-- ~mw.s NO.I.drtml:l --,1
..., >(- -1'-_....___'- :-IN----i
IH;r
W,3\
II i
I ~rc-~ :1rE rr~-L ~- -
II -[lii1l., =. =. W ~ I~ r;:::,.l
II ~ _ -., """"- [;lI ~ !!IL~
'. ~ ..:":J"'"
II Y ~__.. t:t. .. II Ol!
s-
o
~
o
.
~
~
.
~ ~ ~
'" :l J; ~
~ ~ ~
9 9 9
III III III II!
~~~ ~~
5 5 t: II. ~
... ... ;;: .. k III
;:i5~~:~
et;EIii~"'5~
ifl~I!~~:.tl
Cl .. t OIl i .. a:: ;
~~z~~jE15'
I<l _ 2 g a:: ::> ::IE ::.
u2:zz~...i!~
i5 .. ... .. i!;: ~ ~ j:!
~ II -,
~ ~ ~
~
~
c
. I
IAa ~.." "lJ
=q jfm ~~' ~
~ H.J. ~
J.,j3iiIi-~;..._
T
'V
y
I
I
I
~ I
_ r.1
~ ijr~ =I~
I~
_I~
h
I~
I~
I
I
I
~I
I
.
.
y
ACENDA ITEM fJO.
PACE d '1 OF
-~
..
~ =i
<IJ ~
v) ~
\ :e
. '"
~\
\
"
z
<
,...J
p...
~
U
Z
~
>.r,
~
4 ,...J~
,...J-
o
l.f-{~
-. 1!
~
~.
s: ~~
~ u
;>
vi
on
>-'
I
-~
v-;; :
~~i
, ,
-; :
.;
,"
;~'
J
-.
,"
c.
~ .;:
:~~
h""
ll. ;.
~~:g
,~..,
li~:;
ttH
<e:
(f)rf)
O~
~~
<e:b
~~
~E-<
Cl
~ g
o 0;-
> g:
5 ~
~ ~
~ ~
" "
~ ;?;
..J w .tn
H/ '\
wo..~
::?l<~<
~~~'::'
x ~ d:;
~u8~
w~~~
u.....uu
~
~~~
(\
,
1111 !i/II b! I"I!
lit IllI4;," ! I'll Ii Iii
~H!!li< IIm,l! ~ ill Jlllil i
eees ee 98@@@ @ l
t
~
:;;
~ ~
.,
."
.;
- '
t
h
~ ~;
v U
>
ui
'"
"'
,.. ~ :
:~~
,,~;,
Ii>; ,
oi'" :;
! ~:: i
"0"
i:!8.::
w
U
~
~
.
o
~ ~
z,
'" I i'!
' I Pi il. ,
il dPlI ,II !,I
"lIdll! I
d~'''' !nh jll! M
~ ,,1 ,It !Ii\! . 'lllll!l
e ee0e@ il~ ....J
~
~
~
;l
;1
I
,
,
I
~
Cf)rf)
O~
~~
~b
~~
~E-<
o
1
I
o
n
III Iii! ! i 1 dll!i,
~!II'1 h.II;!lll!l!I'l"'
Ii i'lild'l i iilil
:,ilu!lj HII U 11
sea e @eeeGll e
i
1
Ii
!l
!l
I!!
~I
!
i
il?
~J
-
'i'
.1
~ nl
~ 1'1
"II,
~ Iii
~,
. "
"I
.;1:'\"
--
-;'1 '~'il
n
~, !!ghl liUI'I,!hL~IIib'~i
~ 1~1ill Illi\~\ I ~ rm~b
~ Ii!!! 1~!fil!iU ~!n!Ji!J!I!il!lill
:;I '1 ,Ij! ~ ill ; I .
l! UU,I il'!"i! II ,', I "
8 'I mil..... 11't'rP
~ I f l l l =
~ i' I .. 1_ I l"
.. -- - @
h~ !im~~iUIH!~kl!~1 0d
~ I,~II! l!'~ I, ! il' D n"i~,j. fi~ '
~ qm.. "I"" g'I~~"UD'1
~ ~~m lP.m~!~hm!~j!!mml t e '
e "q
! ill
~
~
ja
!I IiI
j I i l ;~
i I I I !I! ~ ~ ~
I I I · !1 ~ - ~
,I, ~ ~ !I! p... .~ ~
'II! ! , '18 pU ~ ~
1.1' ! I !ll l) ~ ~
It! i i "'j ~ z ~
~ i ~ ~ ~a~l PJ ~ ~ ~
I: !! i!' ,1., ~ ~ ~ ~
I i ~I i! !!il- ~ ~ ~'~ ~
I h,!" ~~. ~:!'o, ~ LI 0 ~ () ~
AfEfttflIT~11 bll ~lUU
[ "lPAl'll: :fl 0;: '"
I !. 'aT,.. .;::..,. _
u
." ~~---~
Ff-+--~~-" . ,
, .'
,
,
,
,
[Q]
1"'- I
if! :
J~~ I
~~
-~
!::
:::i
m ~
vi 4
~
~.
" ~.
Z<
" U
5>
vi
'"
>-'
.
"
.
! !ml : ~ ~ ! ! ! ! 11 ~ i I
I! !' i
lll!! "I! I ! II II
llnh ! i I I i I I I !'
! l!lill ! i I I I I I II! I ! i
I 'Ii I ! I ! I I I
lULl L q i II I d I i I
l,l!!!!l i I! I II" - . I
i III!! Ii i I I II. I!! I, I
!+ . 0".~_~~O
r
!~~~
i3ljlii.
E'J "!!l
E'J
~ I
!
. ~
. ~~ !
0
"
-~ I~j , ,
'z i ;
5~ "
..~~ f
"- , !
- ~ · I
; 'I
,I-
"- 'I
,0 <
ll!!I .j!
.;; l' oj
w !!_
13 : o!
lI'I z ..oj f
- "
...J ~~ ~t'!
~ Ii Ii
~ !l J1
,
I
i i :;
'i I
" !
iii
J i !
~2'" g
'ii,
!~P!
:lg..
! I
I ~
, "
H
4 !i
OF '\ \..{fI
AGENDA ITE:l NO.
PACE ..2-le>
J:Ll
p.,
<
U
(J)
o
H z
" .....
'I ""
Iii ~
lli <
!l ' >-<
~ ~ iil f-<
I' I' Po Z
-'10
I H"
~ !' !ill ~
... !.i. ~~1io ~
11 II Wi~
'I ~l !'!j ""
!!' !'I dsou ~
"I 'I -,.1......._
~h ' · i'll'j p., ;;
ili iii !.!,C]
~e~ ~~~ ~~~< ~ ~
,
I
I
I
,
!
".'
z;;
-~
,"
~u"
-,
,;
0'
I'";
11;;
ZilJ::t'
H:=
"0;
0:8__
~
Cfjrf)
O~
~~
E-<
j~
~E-<
Q
z
o
~
:>
Ci
w
e:
~ ~
o "
z z
< -
~ ~ ~U~
~o~
Wo.N
~<Q'\<
o~5'"
:r: 0:: <~ b
!:i 0 Z <
~~~~
tj~88
~
o
~
'"
~
~
!R
I i i i
I , I I I' I
I , , , II
, , , j
I 1 I
I , I i
, , I
, , i
, ,
, 1 i
n I ,
" I i
"' ,
I I f-
I I
, , i
, ,
, , i
I ,
, , i
, ,
, ,
, I i
I I
, I i
I , i
i
i
i
i
i
i
,
" \
, '
, I
, '
\ \
I I
, ,
\V
-t-<l
,'"
I ,
I ,.
n"
, ,
. I'
, ,
, ,
, I
, ,
I ,
, I
I ,
I I
I I
I ,
" ,
"
I
,
I
I
\
~ I
,
\
,
, I
\1'
i~
, \
, I
, ,
, I
I I
, \
I I
I I
I ,
, I
\ I
, I
, ,
\ \
, .
r ;
I \
"..-... \ '-
( "\ \ .... \
" '-........... "~,
'..... '...., L-~~-
" " .y...... ..........
.... - '...... /" '.... ......,
~'_............ .................... -~'."
", IY~'< ,," ," ,____\~ll!.
...... ............, ....,--....,'/
.. ............ .................... 'V.--
...... ...... - '
... ................... --1----
~
i
i
~i
51
OJ
j
i
i
5i
<.
~I
j
j
j
j , ! !
I Il!>l
. ~ ;I: .. ~ii1i ~
i nHIIB~
f "n .E~,.1
~ I !. ,'",,' ,
. ~g~~~~~~~~
.\ "eeeeeee
!\
1 .
I' \.,
."
L".
"
---..:~
!
I
;p: !ii!
l'j ~ ~ ~
! l ~ ;
!Pill
iili~~
@@@@@@
..1
.
i
! !
E I
! ,~
~~~ ~~
di,un
~ e ~ ~o" .. ~
. . '. .... . ,
~ ~ " <.i~"; ~ ill
8@@@@@@
1,1
,H
on
,-
,
!
I!!~~!wm~~!!!! n
~ I!
" >.!~ "
1. ~ <!! 1" I h
:I ~6 ~~Ji~~~g~i ~ >t
i~i~~a~~~~~iili~l j~
> ,
~ g !il1~ ~
~~~ ~ ! ~ ~Sffi'~~ ~
i'l "';'5j"'lll! '.
ll'llll'l!!;!!"l,,!! I!
;:1 ~y~ ~~~ii f~~il i'
~;.!ii,!i!!!.!ll!, i ~
I ~~~~~~~~
. '
~ ~ hili
i 'l<~ l,~
~ ;~:I!I!<:I
l'w..';!
...~ '" .. '"
~ ~5gdUg:::., !.'",.;
~ !l.. ~ old :::!O;~~
: ~~~~g ~~~ ~~~~
~ ~i~~~~~ ~ffi~ ~~~~
~ I ~~',o~,.;"'~ i'~~
o ~~~~~l-ffi~ 8~~ ~~~~
~ i~&~~ ~~ ~w~ ~i~~
f ~"~~-<l~!l f:Sli: 8el~~
~ ~1~~~ill1 ~~~ l!l~
:!
~i
.";
:\i
..,
0',
l\l
'"
o
Cl::
l\l
-.J
<])
Cl
"t)
c::
l\l
l\l
'"
&
~
c::
l\l
C/)
'"
.Q
o
()
.!!l
""
&
,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I <fJ
I '"
I ::;:
I 0
! ACEfllDA ITEM N ';I:,
I
/ PAGE)-z
I
I
I
-
l\l
{g
<])
'"
o
Cl::
, ~
cn~
w~
.
"
,-,-----
'r-~T~rj;f-' .- ;
\ ~_._,n Td m
'""'"""^,,,~I";iS1 ,l": ,
,r-~-~-L:::;;;",._L:;;~'.'---~~J ~:'i'--i.i--'- ~
,---1 ~~ ~~-~1r:.:_l:W.t'~" S)
~ ~l: ~
~L
~---~--~~~-~~:.;;;;=j ---~-
~
~ ~
.
~ 0
~
<
w
0 <
"
S w
0
w "
c S
w
~ 0
0
~ z
<
0
~ W
J
~
'J:m
....1
~'~;h
0:.,
~~~!
@
<
w
c
"
5
w
c
;;
c
E
~
~
Si
;~
::.it;
!
"
~~1
AGENDA ITEIll NO,
PAGE .;) ~
u
u
z
~
w
~
o
u
Lf
0;: 1'1
I
! n
n
~
.
<
.
00
n
AGEND,i\ ITE"j [w.Lf
PACE~Of'
I\.{
"
z
~
~
<
~
.
5
w
c
~
u
w
o
"
u
"
z
~ "
z
. ~
u
U
~ <
. w
5 c
.
w 5
c
w
C
"
<
z
c z
" ~
5
g ~
u
r-~
f Gi
L
"
! ~J[ ~ .~
f; t~
"
L
'l-;.~
~-'
Z', ~-;-_'--,,-,-:'~'-" -
~j rlat
~~
~~
~1EW
~i"H
&:i~:l
~,,:,
~1;~1
@
~i
;~
~~
,
.,
~~~
i:f
;
,.
-.,
A()Ei'::OI~c3~' ol;' 1ft y
F- ~{
t. ~'".. 1. '. t
~-r1 :.,
U~ W j
.~V ~,.
I' ;,..-1 "
r,- ~il" ' ~
j~tid ,,~'1
~ l.~ _, ~'~~J
~,--_~l .~' t,l. ,.
."
~jll
~ ".,
~!m
A
-w
!;
:!:~
u
n
n
n
~
o
.
5
w
o
<
w
o
.
5
w
o
<
w
~
5
~
r
w
2
~
w
ACiENDA ITE.<l NO.~_
PAoe3LoF I
~
~
~
~
s
w
o
z
5
i!
u
"
z
" 0
~
~ u
. ~
U
<
~ 2
"
0 S
"
S w
0
w
0
1 ~
g "
. ~
g 0
F~~"~-=('-="~----1
:'~ h~j I~
~-
L=.
;~~
'"11
I c
t' H f
t i'< r
L~~-=_
'.,.".,,-
,! 1"
~! 'i"""'"
, 0,
M
il~:~~L
f~--fl__~:~j~
"
~
[~~=;~ - ~~.. ~
[~! -~
15 ::: ~ If'.:r~'
i::~
j;\ "i
\_ltGErmAJ]Elii iJO.
_._.~ . PACE "3 ~
i;;!1l
~~;;jj
~1i!J
e
"."_w_"",,"
gi
;~
~~
-m
!~.:
"'i
r
'1
,
f:
;:!l:~
~~~
o:r
s~
.,
,.
::i~
i;::il
~"'"
A!
,~,
~l~ii
@
!~;
<..
~r
OF
U
4-
l\.-f
(\
(\
n
<
<
<
~
"
5
w
c
<
.
o
"
5
w
o
x
.
,
<
a
.
AGENDI\ m::rt, :~o.~_
PAGE 33 0.- I
['
~,
~
~ ~
,
. w
,
;; u
~ ~
0
0 "
" 5
S .
. 0
0
z
<
>
w
~
w
~
il .. ~ J,;:f'~
: .' i~I~~J U~
; ~ :,~:-I
'.;; ~:-_ i._:~._ ;"-.1
~! . G !;}:
E.., _~ J.
i5.
i:,.!!
~f~~;
ll:;:'i!
@
si
S~
5;
~L
7.';::
i::ri
;
~
o
~
u
<
~
"
5
.
o
z
5
.
o
"
::;~ii
~;~;~1
~ ",
CI;:-
~fifl
Tt 'I~r.~!
r-~ilt:;, J!__~ Ii} ;
11'.1. :~~
1Jl-,_~~, 1: " L
'5 .. i'.i\~r~i ~ ! ~~ tl
~ I,......".....;.~ 1"
t f{1 ~'~ ,; U
,,! l/
ACEr',lD/\ iYEJA t1iO..l--.J'
PAGE .~ Lj 00= 11.1
@
g~
;~
-s;
n
('1
('1
x
w
~
.
w
AGErWAITH,j :JO~
PACE ~ S' 0,. I
r~~~
g!
'-
,
o
~
o
<
2
.
5
w
o
z
~
~
u
"
z "
~ 0
2
. u
0
" "
U
~ <
.
0
. .
5 5
w ~ w
0 z 0
0
E z
0
~ ~
~
<
.
u
"='~-"<-
':~,-~
_'r."~_p
ijf,
m
J-:.
lil
..
"'--d<i
~
""-
li"
If.
!J
'_ nc.~ __-J_
,j
T""j
i;:,il
~"".
5:~~;
>,.:;
~!Hj
~
'It.::,I
s:
;~
<:~
;~~
<;"';;;
;:r
~.~~-''---,,'.'~
-~----'=-.-,"-'
,
--{ i,
r'l
it:
r " - "
i, . ,:c.;i{t:~-~ .,J:
~j
i,{i'
G~?'::'~~::'~'
,,-'
L
l'
,
j.
"''''1
-
~l
i_,==-.-::..:.-,-~"_-_J
AGENDJ\ iTE,,1 :lO.
PAGE :-3 b
~",i!
~!;il
@
;ii
;~
-.
o.
,
l!':
~~~
;:,.--
.
u
4
Ci: -, L(
n
n
(\
.
~
.
.
AGEND/\ iTE1 ;W._~ I ':L
PAGE ?> -, OF
r
i:-
""'",-=~'......-
-=;-7--'-"",'.='.=--
,~--
-,
........_._~
ja
~;!
"'
:11
, .
:8':1
,.,
g ii
~ "
~?'"
I~
- - .,._~,
':':-~ :-~~~-b"'"
!$
-:;; .11(
1-4 - .
~
z
o
~
o
~
~
z
<l
~
"
~
~
~
"
~
,
~
o
"
5
~
"
'!;"I
fai
~1;r!
~;:;i
:.::,;;j
@
i4;-==-""=-'~._~~"",,=-,"'.-':~--
i~:,-l~. .
-, .' ~$-:-'l
,~~"",J: ' ~,o_ ~~ .
]:-.._~..=~ t,~_ --'i!
_ '1
" '."..'
r~ r
::i~ ;,--==
"
s~~t~_L
--,-~~ -.
-;].~~il
i~!
;
[I. ""-\"',
M.vk:~'4D.~ iTE;~i r~o.
PASE ?> <t,
"
z
c
e
o
~
~
.
t
~
o
.
:::...!!
.,'
~ .'
::..j
"..
~ <>;
u
u
~:.i!!
~!;i!
A
'ftJ
..~
;H
t~i
,
u
OF
It
I':i.
n
o
..
.,
'"
~
..
'"
Ii)
~
~
...
..
~
II
J.33lU.S Ave Aw.Ilve
------.....
I;;
W
0:
t;
~
~
~
N
'"
..
.
:<:
..
..
!'!
.
Il>
n
.
~
~
~
y
~
.~
III
'"
~
N
'"
l-<
~
l-<
l:>
~
.0
N
..
"
1
l!
"
z
....
;:gUim ..q
I _oc:t M
f?:f5c6 ..q
ci-M"<:t_r- 0 N Nt--
NN<O'f"'''''f'''
m~~LO~~-roM
.,...-,N.q "<:t N ('I') M M
cncnNcncncncncn
r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-
00000000
....J....J....J....J....J....J....J....J
II II II II II II II II
q;.co t.l q; co t.l q; co
MMMv..q..ql.C)l.{)
LULULULULULULULU
cncncncncncncncn
q;q;q;q;q;q;q;q;
IIIIIIII
a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
-......
........--..
~. [:)
gj
!l
. ~
"HO 3S0H !)Nnl~
.
, -
. ...
gj .
. .
. tI
~ .... t;:;
... w
0 .. 0:
.. II "1 Ii;
w
0
0; w ::1 Cii
;;, 0:
0: ~
.0.
w 0:
.. .. . '"
lllnO:> .JV3103H o. ...
0: .
<:> .
l:; I II co
-', ...
~.
.....
. t;
... .
!1l lil N .
.
(\ ....
133IUS NOl<I~nH:>
AGENDA ITEA .;0.
PAGE :5 9
Lf
OF~
f-
(f)
w
o
0;
oc
<( w
Ul >
0, <i'
a:
:s
w
o
<(
Ul
o
a:
<(
I-
Z
<(
Ul
11
z
~'
~
;;..
~
....
Z
....
U
....
;>
W
l-
e;;
..J
W
C
o
:s
~
~
~
:s'
~
~
~
~
~
~
:'l:.
~
~ U
~
,i:Cl
~.
~
~
''"':I
~
~
Eo..
~
&S
ZEo..
O~
;;..~
,Z ~
. I
<.
U~
<~
~O
~=
~. r.;a
CS8 U
~~
Fr'""''"',, '~"'.' PO 4
'''~'':~,',~-'0 '0' (ll' I u
r~-~i",',-n: . I . -l
u
(\
n
(\
-,
, I I I r--. r--. I
... ... ... ~I~I ... \C \C
<' < 0 0
'" '" '" 0'\ .... '" I 0 0
0 on = = = "'" 0'\1 = M M
0 I- ..., ... ... ... 001 ... "'
"'" QCl IJ;" IJ;" IJ;" ..... M IJ;" I ...< ...< I ~
..
..... ..... e "' "' 0"' ~~ "' I all all ... "0
<' <' ... -.. -.. .. "'''' -1.1 > <II
-= ... ... ... ... ~ ~ 0 \C ~
0'\ 0 >> <II >> >> '-' '-' <II >> <II ~ <II <II ~ <II .,
'" '-' '-' .....
I- .... ~ -- ~ ~ QClon -- ~ -- -- -- -- < "'
0'\ I- '" = I- on = = = = = l- I- = = on 0
.... ..... .. <II <II <II I-M <II l- I- ... < '"'
<' 0 '" '" '" l';-"\l '" l- I- ...
<' '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .... .... '" 0
on on .... .... QCl
0 ..., U .... .... I I \C
"'" .... .... .... .... NN .... on on .....
\C \C ..., ..., ..., ..., .... ....
.... ..... ..... ..... ..... UU ..... I N
QCl QCl QCl QCl I, N
U U on
.....
QCl
0
.
r--. - ....
CI <' r--. .....
<' r--.' r--. "0' ~ "0 < 0'\
< on on on 0
on on on = on "'" = on on r--.
0 0 0 <II 0 I <II ..... ..... "'"
0 I- ..... M ..... '" ..... "'" '" \C \C "0 ....
"'" QCl ... 0' on on I-
~ ..... ..... e ~ ~, "0 ~ "0 N ... <II '-'
<' <' ... ~ ... N > ., .~
... '" '" -= '" -= e e "'" "'
~ B 0 -
0 -= '-' ~ '-' '" '-' <II '" <II <II ~ ~ <II ~ ., .... ..
~ 0'\ '" <II <II QCl <II e
I- .... \C \C \C -- -- --' ..., ..., , -- <
I- '" "'" = "'" ..2:l "'" 0 = ... = = = = M M = = ~ U "
0'\ I- -
... .... ..... .. ..... ..... ~ ..... ~ .... .... ...
.. 0 ... .... "'"
U 0 \C \C \C "'" "'" .~
0 <' <' - I I ~ . .... ~ .... .... '" 0
= 0 on on on .... I . \C
~ .- 0 ..., U .... .... 0 .... I 0 on on ..... "'
"' on
- "'" .... . . 0 I 0 .... .... ...
~ \C \C N N ..... N .... ..... N N CI
~ .... ..... U U QCl U N QCl
~ U U ..
U 0
<II -
'"' , 0
t3 .. S2
~ ~ "'
"' r--. ~ ~ ~ ~ ....
~ 0 0 0 C> 0 ~ C> ~ ~ =
~ <' < .... .... on .... l- on ..., ..., <II
....
l- I- l- I- 0'\ l- on on -
~ <II 0 on ..... ..... ..... 0 M ..... e = =
'"' <::> I- .... + + 0 '"
"'" QCl ~ ~ ~ .... .... .... "' =
~ ... ..... ..... ... '" '" ..., '" ~ ..., , ::g ::g <II '"
CI e ..., ..., ... ... = 0
> .. U
<' <' ... ~ ~ on ~ '" on e e 0 u Eo<
c5 0'\ <::> ..c B ~ B N CI '-' ~ N <II ~ ~ <II <II ~ ., \C t
I- .... '" IJ;" '-' \C IJ;" -- -- 0'\ 0'\ -- < ..c <::>
I- '" = '-' .... = '-' = = = M ..... = = '"
U 0'\ M .. 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ \C .... ... .... QCl ~
.... ..., ..., .... ..., .... .... ... = QCl
0 "'" "'" QCl "'" I- QCl \C \C
<' <' - . I I '" CI ::g 0
0 0'\ 0'\ \C 0'\ on \C on on ..
. . on I on ~
<::> ..., U on on on .... .... .... "'" U
"'" .... I N I N N I-
\C .... .... on .... on '" "0
\C N N .... . .... ...
.... ..... N N U N u u ....
u u U <II
U U .-
I, '"
0
'"
'"
"' r--. ~ ~ ~ <
., "' "' "' "' ~
t: .... t: t: "' "'
..... e .. ~ ...
<II <II <II <II :c;
<II -= ..c -= -= '-' ...
.... U U U U "' <II =
.. , I>Jl " ~ 0
0 e e e e .$ "' ....
0 = U .. '"
.;: .- .;: .;: - 0
CI .. .- .~ '-' 0 ...
= = Eo< Eo< Eo< Eo< <II "0
... ~ ~ "' CI <II
<II <II .... ~ .- I>Jl
i5: i5: I>Jl ... ... ... ... .- '" '" ~ ...
'" f ... ... ... .. 0 '" "0 0 U ~ ~ ... ...
I I .. '" rFJ '" '" 0 .... .- ~ '" ... '" e ...
= = <II '-' '-' '-' '-' CI '" '" '-' .... .;: > <II e.
~ 0 = .- .. 0
0 .~ " .... M ..., "'" ~ '- "0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <II
'';: 0 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: ... <II ... IJ;" I ~
.... <II -- tlJ) -= '" .. = ... I I 0
<II <II '0:; oS e- El e e e <II .- ... .... .... = .. .... '" .,!.
> > '" t: .- .... = .- = = '"
'" .... .... .. '.. Q. := ,= 0 -= 0
... .. = .- .- .;: .- 0 .- =
~ ~ <II = .. .. .. <II 0 ... <II <II -= .. Eo< <II 0
IJ;" 0 ~ Eo< Eo< Eo< Eo< " ~ ;> Eo< ~ .... .... ~
'" IJ;" .. '" ~ '"
t\G[~rCA rrE~;l r!,o.
P,~JE. ~ f
tt
OF Il.{
..,.
....
o
....
"
..
'"
ll.
,-.. s ,-.. ,-..
= = III = = c c 't:l
...,
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .... .... .... ..
~ c c c -=
III 0 0 0 0 ~ M M '"
C t- ..., ... ... ~ ... .. ... ~ = ..
"f' QO .. ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ ::;: -
M M E q 't:l (11 (11 (11 .. ...
't:l 't:l 'E 't:l ~ ~ ....,
~ =- .. ... ... .. ... f;l;l f;l;l f;l;l 0 ..
-= oS oS e oS = oS e ~ e .. ,.Q Q\ =
C .. ~ .. .. ~ .. = .. "f' 0
t- .... .. .... -- .... .... -- - -- d '-' -- < < ....
Q\ t- V! .. = .. Q\ .. = .. ...., = = ...., ...., ~ = '"
...' ... ... t- ... ~ ... - .. ~ 't:l
.... ... .... .... .... - ;:!: "f' "f' .. .. =
g =- 0 V! V! .". (11 III V! t- t- ... V!
- .... III III III III ..
0 ~ ~ .... ~ ..., ~ , , , 0 V!
...., U . QO III III III ~
"f' .... .". .". III .". .". .... .... ... ....,
'C> ..., C C ... ~ c , . , III
.... ... t- t- N t- N N N III
QO QO QO QO U U U M
U III
...
QO
C
,
,-.. ,-.. ...
.". .". ...
=- ,-.. ,-.. ~ ,-.. ,-.. ,-.. ..., ..., 't:l Q\
~ QO QO QO ... QO ... C C .. ~
C III .". .". '1' ... '1' ~ M ... >< .... -=
C t- III QO QO QO t- QO = .. '" ...
QO ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ .. .. .. t-
'1' .. '" ~ -
Eo-. ... ... E ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ o(l o(l .. .. ... '-'
~ =- .. 't:l ~ ~
~ .. V! V! .. V! V! (11 ~ ~ ~ ... 0 e
c -= '-' .. '-' '" '-' '-' ~ '-' .. ~ ~ 0 .. ,.Q ... 0
.. '-' '-' ~ .. ...
~ ... .., -- .., = .., Q\ .., Q\ -- -- < ...
V! = = = = QO QO = .... ..
Q\ t- .., .., ... .., c .., c ..., ..., '" .. = ... ~
.. .... ... ... t- t- t- '1' t- '1' = ~
... 0 .., .., ... .., .., ...., .., ... ... ,~ .. i:i =
u 0 g =- C; , , M , , . , M M OJ) V! OJ)
= III OIl III OIl III III III ... ... ,~ QO .~
~ .~ .., U .... ... ... ... ... ... . . '"
'" '1' ... , N N N N N OIl III i:l:: .... c ..
- ..., N ... ... ... ... ~
f;l;l ...,
.... ... U U U U U u N N III
~ .. M ...
..>: U U 0
-
.. 0
t3 ~ S:!
=- ~ <' ~ ,-.. .. '"
'" < < < ....
~ 0 ,-.. ,-.. .... =
... ... ... ... .... ..
i::.:: =- .. .., ~ C- O
~ Q\ Q\ .... "" t- Q\ .. .. .. ....
.. III .., .., .~ .., ... .., = = .. :;
~ C -= .... ....
~ t- '1' III OIl OIl OIl ~ .~ l:
c ~ ... ... ~ = '"
~ '1' QO .. .. .. .. ~ .. ~ = =
.. ... M E ... ... ... ... .. .. 0 .. .. 0
~ .. .. 't:l .. .. .~ 's.. ~ ... U
=- =- .. .. .. = .. V! .. ~ l:l. U 0 ..,
~ -= e e 0 e '-' e E E ,.Q .., 't:l i
Q\ C .. .. ~ ~ .. 't:l ~ ..
t- ... .. -- E ..., -- 'C> -- '" ~ - < < ...
Q\ t- V! Q = C < C .., = c ...., = = = - 0 = ..
\,) ... ... ... .., . .., .., c .., c 0 0 .. ~ -= g
0 M ... ... ... M ... '" .. ....
=- =- - ~ ... ... Z Z = V! ..
c c c , c , ...
.., 0 ... ... ... III ... III ..., ..., '6iJ .. ~
C U c ~
~ ... , , , ... , ... Q\ Q\ OJ)
..., III OIl QO OIl N III N III III ,~ 't:l
... ... ... ... ... ... QO QO i:l:: III ..
.... N N QO . u N u ... ....
N ..
..., .~
U U U U M ..
0
'"
I> '"
'" ,-.. ,-.. ,-.. ,-.. <
,.Q '" '" '" '" ~
1:: .... 1:: .... . .'" '"
E ... ... ..
.. .. .. .. e -
.. -= -= -= -= ,.Q ..
.... U U U U '" .. =
... OJ) ~ --. 0
0 E E E E = .'" ....
:: 0 ,~ = U ... V!
.~ ';:: .~ .;:: - 0
~ ... ... .~ .~ ..
...... '-' 0
= = ... ... ... ... .. OJ) '" ~ 't:l ..
.. '" ~
.. .. ... = .... ,-.. ,~ OJ)
lOll '.. .. .. .. .~ '" '" ~ ..
is:; is:; e .. .. .. .. 0 't:l 0 U c- ,ti .. ..
~ V! V! V! V! 0 .... .. N E ..
, , '" iii ~ .... ~
.. '-' '-' '-' '-' ~ '-' .;:: ~ ..
= = .. 0 = .~ '... 0
.~ ,~ ..>: ~ ... ... ~ .". ~ - 't:l '" ~ f;l;l ~ i::.:: ..
0 'II: 'II: 'II: ~ .. .. lOll ... , f;l;l
.... .... .. } .. ... = .. , , 0
.. .. ,~ 0 -= .... .... = .. .... .. .,!.
E E E E .. .~ .. ,~ =
> > :" .. - .. 1:: .... :a = = ..
.... ... l:l. - 0
.. .. '" = .... ';:: .~ .;:: .~ ... .~ = 0 0 ,~ .=
~ ~ .. = ... ... .. 0 .. .. .. -= ... ... - .. .... 0
:": ... 0 f;l;l ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ;;. ... i::.:: V! ... i< V! ~ (11 i::.::
ACENDj~ iTEL~ t00.
PAGE Y;)-
If
11.1
OF
u
'"
...
o
D
u
("'\
(\
"
(',
. .
.
~ U
U .,.,
er--~
e 00
~ N ~
UU!
~e..c
r-- .... "
~~r::
~ ~ 0
UUC;
e.....U
.". ....
'" '"
.... M
~
~
~
U
.~
~
~
U
~
~
~
.~
\.:,)
~ U
U .,.,
gr--oo
.".00..
M ~ a
~ U ..
Ue..c
~ .... "
r--r--en
~ Q'\ N I-
...... 0
~rJ'Uo
.~ ~ ~ u
- .". '"
~ ~ N
..
.:.:
Ol
~
"
'"
o
~UU
Ol e .,.,
~er--r--
.. ~ ~ ..
~ ~ ~ a
U U ..
~e'5
r--....en
~ ~ -
~ ~ 0
UUC;
e ..... U
.". ....
'" '"
.... M
c: c:
to Ol
s: s:
, ,
c: c::::
~ .,3 <::
Ol to
.. ..
.. ..
~ ~
VJ--__
"t:l7.l~~t:fI'.l -,.,j
a Ol ; ; Ol ~ ~ .
Ol..c..c:..c..c e.,
......UUUU '" Ol
CIl" ~
oaaaa c:_'" ..
~ 'C 'C "5: oc ~.s ~ g
~':':':': ~~.;~~ ~
l7.l = ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~'~ -8 ~
_"OOlJ'JOOOOOfl'.l:'~""", ....
Q,) == '-" '-' --- '-" ~ 0 "oJ =
,.,:;c r ~ ..-.4 N ft") "l:J" ^. -::: "0.. f!l", fI'..l r.....-,
== <:) ~ ::ft: ,~ ::fI: ::f:t: ~...... u; .. = t ::
.<; ..5:i ~ a a a a Ol '5 .~: .. .~ t: c:
;:; -= Of: oc OC"C ; E; t;J:' ~= = e
.... 0 >"I .... ..... .... .... " ll.. ~'I ~ ~ r}3.... . .
---- .-.
eeee e
01000___0
O\O\O\O\N\ONO\
NNNNN"I!:tNN,
ll..ll..~ll..~~~ll..
enenenen~~~en
eeee~~~e~
~..".~
r---r---t'--:I'-OQOor---c
....................."........"......
NNNNM"'l:f'ft")N
coo<:> 1'10
.................."f"'"ll/')l/')lt;l,.....
.n.JJtA.n~~':(..n
......,.....,...........NNN""'"
NNNNUUUN
UUUU U
----
eeee
~~~~
..... ,..... ..... ......
....................
>"1>"1>"1>"1
8888
.. ..
c: =
o 0
.... ...
en en
'E'E
Ol Ol
'" '",
c: =
Ol Ol
~~
~~
.,.,.,.,
..........
'" '"
00 00
~
.".
....
M
.,.,
N
....
~
~
..".
....
M
.,.,
N
~Ol
e__
.,., c:
00
'"
,
.,.,
....
N
U
............~......o
MMMM.,.,
r-- r--. r-- r-- 00
.."..".."...".",
.........................
.n.n.n.n1!J,
................N
NNNNU
UUUU
----
f'4")Mf'4")MG'SSG'
.,.,~~~~..........~ .
~,.....,........... =00 (':I
.....NN......
~~~~.ra~~.ra
enenenenCenenC
'-''-''-''-' '-''-'
r- r- r-- r-- ~ 00 00 M'~
....................M"''''~c:
OOClOMl/')l/')ft")
MMMM......O\o,\......
~~"t'7 I I I I
.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.
..............................................
NNNNNNUUNN.
UUUUU U
v
~
. e
-0 ___
"'~eee
,..". M............... .
QO NNN
'M ll.. M M M
~~~~~
;,~e~~~
..".~. ~ ~ ~
00 .- ~ ~ ~
..........~~~
..".M",,,,,,,
I 0 I I I
IT; ...... II) tn' tr.l
.......A................
N~NNN
UNUUU
, U
.
Q,)':-"'-"_-
eeee
.oc: .~ M M N
..........r---.r:-t'
en.....MMM
'E~~~~
Olcenen",
litJ '-' -- '-'
c:
Ol
~
~
.,.,
.....
'"
00
....... I"Q \0 \0
N,.....,...........
r--.."..."...".
""'000000
...... I I I
'11')11')11')
tr.l..................
"':'NNN
tluuu
-
~~
"'.....
~~..c..c..c
,5......~.-=;::
.ra~aaa
c,,,,~~~
'-' u U' u
Mr--OlOlOl
"'l:tM---
Me===
~~zzz
I 1\0\0\0
l/')tn~l"'--r---
~....r--r--r--
NNOOoooo
Uu
..
:E
.,
=
~
..c
'" ..
;: >- \0
CIlOe
..:! = ..c 0\
= f;<l < <
5 ~ ~
~ '"
"
<:J\
....
....
....
....
~
'0
....
~ ..
o
~ g.,
c:"<
~ 3l
e'"
e
~
.
~ ~
'0 0
~~..c
= <
'" ..
.... ..
:::'"
.:.:
"
'C
=
=
,~
..c:
....
..
..
=
o
....
'"
..
'0
,~
~ ~
.. N
.. Ol
~ ..
,....
.. .l.
= =
o ,~
... Ol
enll..
=
~
Ol
U
~
=
~
.".
.....
'"
.,.,
.,.,
M
00
e
,
....
M
<:J\
~
.. .".
;....
= = c
= .. ~
o en =
"g tI) f
"'~"
~ 00 =
M eJ I,~
'" ..
~
..
o
-
o
U
--
'"
...
=
Ol
....
-
'" =
e a
'0 0
Ol U
ll..
~~€
< ~ ~
Of
~ll..
""'0
..
....
Ol
,~
"
o
'"
'"
<
....
....
o
..,
~
"
~
Ol
CIl
..
a~
o Ol
0>"1
" o,!,
" 0
= 0
oo~
AGENOAITE:il NO,~
PACE l.('" OF
,..., I,...,
""" ,..., ... ,..., ,...,
,..., ,..., "'" Q ,..., Q f'l -< -<
A ~ \0 \0 \0 f'l \0 f'l Q . -d
00 00 00 "'" 00 "'" '" li'l li'l I
Q '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "'" "'" '0 .d
<:> r-- ... '" '" '" ~ '" ~ ..:i li'l li'l - "'
00 li'l li'l 0 r;
"'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:?j ..
'" '" .. '" '" N N
e .. ""
A A '" '" '" '-' '" '-' ~ ... ... 00 =
.. '-' '-' '-' '-' ~ 0 ..
~ ~ '-' '-' .t::I '" ..
0'1 <:> .d Z = Z Z Z = ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
~ ~ ~ -< -< = -< -< ..
r-- ... ""' '" = '" '" 00 '" 00 = = = = = Eo<
0'1 r-- '" f'l f'l f'l li'l f'l li'l ... '" '" e:- .. :::::
... '" .. f'l f'l f'l 00 f'l 00 "" <:> <:> .. ~
0'1 f'l f'l r-- ...
~. t:S 0 \0 \0 \0 ... \0 ... "!
<:> ... ...
c; , , , ... , ... , , f'l
<:> f'l li'l li'l li'l , li'l , ... li'l li'l ... <:>
"" ... u ... ... ... li'l ... li'l , ... ... ... '"
\0 N . , ... N ... li'l 'II: li'l
\0 N N , , ... N N
... '" N N N . ""
u u u u u u
u u U li'l
'"
~
,
,..., "'" ...
<:> <:> ,..., "" ,..., '"
A ~ <:> <:> ~ f'l f'l 0'1
'0 '0 '" '0 '" '0 "" "" "'" ,...,
<:> '" '" <:> <:> ""
<:> ... 0 0 0 0 \0 f'l f'l .. ...
"" 00 ... 0 0 ,:l., 0 ,:l., 0 f'l ~ '0 r--
'" '" .. ~ ~ '" ~ '" ~ li'l f;l;l f;l;l .. .. .. '-'
Eo., e e - 0
g e = = \:i = ~ .t::I .. "' ~
A f;l;l f;l;l .- ""'
l:c: .. .. .. .. .t::I 0 ~ =
0'1 .d .. = .. e .. e .. ~ ~ ~ ~ -< -< ~ 0 .t::I >. 0 e
~ = ~ = = = -<
r-- ... ""' = li'l = = = = '" '" = u U
0'1 r-- '" !:l:: !:l:: <:> !:l:: <:> !:l:: = ~
~ f'l \0 \0 .. U
... '" .. ~ ~ ... ~ ... ~ f'l '" '" "" .. '"
U 0 A i:l 0 0'1 0'1 "" 0'1 0'1 f'l '" <:> =
= c; li'l li'l r-- r-- li'l . , , 'II: \0 \0 I.~
~ .- <:> f'l ... ... , ... , .... li'l li'l li'l '" "" "'
"' U f'l f'l li'l ~ li'l f'l ... ... ... '" ..
- "" ... ... ... N
f;l;l \0 \0 00 QC) N N QC) N N ~
'"
~ .. ... u u u ..
~ u u 0
= -
..:i 0
t3 ~
of ;!i
"'
~ 0 ,..., "'" ,..., ,..., =
!:l:: A ~ li'l li'l .. li'l li'l .. .s
... ... .~ '0 ... '0 ... -
.t::I -
~ = <:> <:> <:> 0 <:> '0 <:> ... ... ::;
..:i <:> <:> f'l f'l .. 0 f'l 0 f'l = = .t::I "'
"" QC) ... ~ i:t: i:t: .- .- 0 = =
~ f;l;l f;l;l f;l;l f;l;l 0 0 u
.. '" '" .. ""' ,:l., ,:l., .. = 0
~ e e e 's "' e "' e ..' 0'1 'l:l U
g i:l ::.: ::.: '" '" = ""
CS .. '" '" = 0 '" 0 'i
<:> .d ~ ~ ~ f = ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. = ""' .t::I '" ""'
r-- ... ""' 0 0 .. ~ .- -< 0
0'1 r-- '" '" = '" .. ;:?j '" ;:?j '" = = = = l:l. l:l. = .. ;:?j
\,) ... '" r-- r-- U ...... ...... >. >. '" '" QC)
.. QC) QC) QC) QC) u u e '" ..:i 0'1
i:l i:l 0 \0 \0 ~ -< \0 -< \0 '" 0
- , , , . -< li'l ..
0 li'l li'l li'l li'l li'l li'l \0 \0 "" ,:l.,
<:> f'l U ... ... ... QC) ... QC) ... ... ... li'l
"'" ... N , ...... '" N '" N li'l li'l '" '0
\0 \0 N r-- QC) QC) li'l '"
... '" u U r-- U U 'II: ...
=
.-
""'
0
"'
.:.: . '"
< '" ,..., ,..., ,..., ,..., -<
.t::I '" tl '" t ,...,
1:: 1:: "' '"
e .. e '"
I." = .. = = -
= .d ..c:: ..c:: .d .t::I ..
< .... u u u u "' = =
.. bI) ~ ,..., 0
.... 0 e e e e = '" ...
0 .- = u .. '"
.- .- .- .- - 0
~ .. .. .. .. .- .~ '-' 0 '"
= = Eo< Eo< Eo< Eo< = '0
'" ~ ~ '" ~ =
= = ... ,..., .- bI)
- ~ bI) '" '" .. .. .- '" -"' ~ '"
,:l., = .. .. '" .. 0 "' '0 0 C> ~ .. ..
'" .. '" ~ '" '" 0 ... 00 ,:l., u ""' .. N e '"
, , .. "' ... .- 1i
= = .. = '-' '-' '-' ~ 0 .,-, = .. .. = 0
'" .- ..
0 .S ~ ~ ... '" f'l "'" ~ ,:l., - '0 ~ .. f;l;l ~ ~ ... . , =
'l:l ... 0 ~ 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: = '" .. 0 f;l;l
= .d ""' .. = = ,
= ~I< '" 0 e e e e .- .. ... ... .. ... .,,", ..,!.
.. - = ""' ... .- ... = .- = = ...,
... .. .. .. l:l. - ::;. .d 0
.. '" .- .- .- '1: .- 0 0 .- '::;
f,;;1 f,;;1// = ::; = .. .. .. = 0 .. = = ..c:: .. Eo< = 0
... 0 f;l;l Eo< Eo< Eo< Eo< ~ ,:l., > Eo< !:l:: ... ... ,:l., ... !:l::
'" .. '" '"
I.
u
....
....
o
9
u
AGEJJDA ITEr~1 fJO.
PAGE L( 'of
It
OF ---r I:{
(\
(\
en
......
.-
C
.=>
-g .~
> a ><
a 0:: Q)
L- ......
a.coc
a......J Q)
<(Q)O
.~O ~
U)L-OJ
::J a
aLL
.-
>
Q)
L-
0..
(\
-
,
, l~
. I.
ACENDA i1Eij IJO. Lf-
PACE "1 ~- OF ""1 4
j>Ii"Ii~ I = ol C\I l ilill
lHllI 0< ....Dl;:s...... .~"Ii .~.
- ,~ ~ ~ !~ g ... ~ a! ill ...~ ~
J I Q j l:i a~ <0 ~. 0 I: ~ S"," " ~
d/!I!/!I!IIII1IIII11. "~~ ~:~ g .. ~lli! '! .! I)'" ji~g
1111111111111111" h j C\I I lIB I~~t;
111:'1 !I I "JI!,IH~ ~~~D H~:1I1 I'll jl~~I~:&J~ ~
'bg Ii ! 1U*llil ~i > ilinll,!!1 l'~lllm ~
~ lilrlllllrllll'iUflllilllll III I~III" I
- !3E113E1EJI313E1[!H!ll!3 l!} (!J l!l I!l f!1(!1 l!l1!J l!l l!Il!JliIlillilOOOOliHillillil ~...~ ......' ~
.~u
I I
1<
~
-
..
-
-
-
- -
-
'~.'I ,
i
i
z
0
&
I c
~ z
<
I . z
<
....
..
I a:
0
0
~
~
, I U
I
I
,
I
Ia
.
.
I
.
,
I
,j
h
"
l'
I! . Ire
"
!,
'l
= ~ ~
I
,
I
l
-
-
..
- -
-@.
8 '
I I
j!
8!1
I -@.
i
.-
.
I
'"
,
I
I~: I :
~ij I
I. I
,. "
I ...h==========~
I
-
-
..
- -
-
-
~
-
-
u
p~~ ~ If
v ~. ,
PAGE '1~ Ol'~
-
n
n
n
E-<
Z
o
~
~
<
'-0
'-0
C"'l
("'.l
Z
~
~~
;><U
z;S
<~
u~
<~
E-<~
~;)i
cn2
~;S
E-<~
<~
m<:
a:lQ
~
0;>
U2
::;~
<:
~~.
<::J
o
~>
Ogj
~p.
;><
a:l
<
m
o
p::
<
......:l
~
o
4
"GENDA IIE'.1 r~o. "-f
" , . -- "1' -,
PJ'''cE -.. , v.
I
r>::
<
~ u
<
\0
\0
N
N
Z
O~
~~
f-o <(5
~
...l u<
<!:
f-;BJ
f-;O
~P<:
(/)f-o
0<
r:.:::;;i
E-<~
<~
(/)Z U
co<
o~
u<
f-o <0
::r: .....,~
0 ~~
@
<~
~~
000
(..I.; 5
~
;>-<>
co~
<I><
(/)
0
r:.:::
<
~
~
. . Cl
U
ACENDA ITEM NO. 4
PAGE ye Or:~
n
~
o
~
~
(\
a:l
\0
\0
N
N
~
z>-
O~
u
.ri~
<~
Ucs
<p:::
t-<!:;:
t-<<
~'"
(J')~
0<
~~
t-<<
<~
(J')<
o:l ~ .
00
Up:::
:%g;
<
~~
<::>
"",0
r.;>
Oga
~IJ..
:>-<
o:l
<
(J')
o
~
:s
~
Cl
n
t-<
Z
o
~
>:r..,
U
\0
\0
N
N
Z
o
z><
O~
~~
<4;
uen
~
<Eo-<
E-<<:
E-<<:
~en
en~
0<:
~Eo-<
t-<~
<en
en
en<:
P=lCl
Og:
UO
<g:
......".
0<:
z~
<:g
><9
O~
>:r..,g:
:>-<
P=l
<
en
o
p:::
~
....:l
~
o
u
u
u
_..~. IF" "0 II
PiGtIY..:..iF'. iCl~'J Hi. ..
"";Y7- c::~ OF I 4
'i-.'..>... ,.;v
(\
(\
(\,
E-<
Z
o
~
~
o
\0
\0
N
N
Z
o
Z~
0<
:>-U
Z~
~G:i
U~
<p::
E-<f-<
E-<~
i:.L:I'"
CZl~
0<
~f-<
E-<~
<~
CZl<
o::la
O~
Uo
~g:
"""ez
~g
o
><:;;
O~
~p..
:>-
o::l
~
CZl
o
~
~
......:l
i:.L:I
o
.. ., "() 4-
ACENDA IrE;:, ;;:. . u
c I 0;: -, (
PAGE 0
t;;lfj;~ ;l..r (\I I iP!11
h~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ C:)! III .:.. 1
Ju ~ . ~;" 52 9.. ~ f! ~ I . . ~~ ,...
dl!I!I~I~ IIIIIIIIII~-' i ~ ~ ~ ;~ 8 - ~I ,! 'Il ! filji j~~~ {\J
I 111111111111111.. t fl ... j ~ W I H H I j~ u i 0:( U
;IH i i. II'II~~~I !Ii~'.!i~ill! lillll~~ ~ :::l1: i
i!ll~ II · .I~I 11lf '! . jl~hdllH aei!i!IIII~Jdll ~ Ii
'1I1!!lllI!~ :"." l ~ 3~i_!_~I!~I!1!Jm I~IIII i Ii Illi Ii
,
,
: f~~
J 'h
D 1 ~~~
,",': l'>
:g ~~~
I : ~~l
; ~~~
! g~
, ~~~
L, ~~
:
~
HSINVdS -
'~.II I
I
j
Z
~
Q.
e
~
z
..
-'
Q.
a:
e
0
Ii
....
.,
~ U
:c
W -:;:~- , 1=::.::;:"--=-.;z:====~=:::.? ~
it~' I i
Ii ~ r !
~
~
~
"2!I
:ij [@l--Jilll
~~.. ~
4 '" *
~~ __________J..._______
u
ACE,mA lIE", IU .
P"'" ~.r- OF -, U
MV... ~
I:l
o <
~ s
~ '"
~ j
- < '"
(\
~
(\
~.
n
of (\I. .. I 'PII ~
! ~/ ::; ~ghfl ':.:' <C
g ~I ~ ~. ~,'~J I hB, i~1 i~
.. j ~ W I fIUi j~~ Ie(
. ~l ~!!!'lb.i11 : hi "' ~~ .~~~~ I
~llIh1Idl!~illltilg 'IS ~ II "II
loim;il!!l ' 'II" ~
III f!!iI!i!ilh5i n ~ f ·
II, ~lif!ifiil~: ~ ll! I ,i ~
Iii 'd"t;R~!I1i ll~ C!~ u'.
gfiim~imim!!fifhu g II nil
-----.,
I r-1
&5 I
J~ '
~
: .
:
c_,
,
_ __.J
r-,
nL_J
.. .. ..'"
HSINVdS _
'~'II i
~
z
c
i
0:
o
o
-'
...
!i!
o
()
w
'"
~
,
,
,
~
AGENDA ITEM rJo.~
PAGES-? OF~
E-<
Z
o
~
~
u
~
o
-
r--
N
Z
o
z>-
O~
><...:
~E
u~
~~
E-<~
E-<...:
~cn
I/.)~
0...:
~~ U
E-<...:
~~
1/.)"':
t,:QCl
O~
UO
~g:
>-, ll.
O~
z~
-<::J
;><~
0>Ll
~g:
><
t,:Q
-<
I/.)
o
~
-<
~
~
o
u
Y-
AGENDA !TErEf"4 Of- ~
PAG"_.__:_
(\ 0::
<
w
0::
~
0
.......
r---
("'l
Z
Oz
>-<0
z?i
f- ~c:5
~ U<r:
w ~!::
-l.
E-<~
E-<O
~o::
r:/)f-
0<
~;;j
E-<~
~~
(\ r:/)Z
o:l<
O~
U<r:
~t:l
f- -.~
. ::c
.. 0 00
..
.. 02 zg:
~~
;x:~
OC/J
~5
-
>-<>
o:l~
~
r:/)
0
~
~
.....:l
~
0
n
',l~ i Er~' NO. lilY..
PAGE S5~Or-
[-<
z
o
~
r,...,
U
i:Q
o
-
r--
N
Z
o
6~
:><u
z;:S
-<~
U(3
-<~
[-<f-<
[-<<
~;;i
1Zl0
O~
~;:S U'
[-<~
<~
1Zl<
~t:l
O~
UO
<~
....., p..
0<
z~
<[g
><:0
O~
r,...,g:
><
~
-<
IZl
o
0:::
-<
......:l
~
o
u
'''0 4'
f'(;~'\'::'.' ,', .': . -., l J
'-_P:,.c,; S-~ Cr-~
i. ._.______.
(\
(\
n
[-<
z
o
P:::
~
u
o
-
r-
N
Z
o
6~
~~
<r:!::
u~
<r:~
[-<f-.
[-<<(
~;;;
ifJO
o~
P:::~
[-<~
<r:Ul
ifJ~
~t:l
O~
UO
<r:~
......,g:;
~~
<r:[g
~g
:>
O~
~~
><
~
<r:
ifJ
~
<r:
~
~
o
ACENDA P"C'^ "'0 lL
tL'.;, ,...:. 1
Pt.::;!: S 7 or- I Y
~ u
~
~
o
o
.......
t-
N
Z
o
6~
~~
2S~
<~
t--I-<
r-<.o:
~;;!i
CI'.l~
~;:i
~~ U
CI'.l~
~t:l
o~
~~
~~
:><8
0>
~~
><
P=l
<
CI'.l
o
~
j
J:il
o
u
ttCE'ml':\ ITE'~ "0 1I.
,. ~~ )\)- . "r
PAGE S~e OF I '-1
(\
~. , ~. ~ ") ~ , . !Ill! l
~ l3 :::,'~:1' g ... g 11121 : v-
J....: r~ g~ ~ ~ il '~I I iji/; ;!i .1
CII, ." J l.HI J~;c J<e
,,~ 'I'JI: ~ ~ Ii III II Ii! i!mlll'~I'YI~~mi!;~I,ll~ ~ in;
".lhli '1"'1'" I'!. I"I! Oi, II' 0
"hl 'I i, if i n I, . : I I- at ",' I lid ' fl i
at !4!~ . Ii iI ~"f i t i I d i I "I!l!ti - IW .. .
IIl!i~ II~', f ~if' ri i .! I,: Jf j!ig'j'flj.BIUf ~ Sl ~
~&H;II.fiI~ui' f : : III L UIIIDi'''lim~1 g II Ii
' EI EIE1 ElI!I EI I!lElIilIilIilIilIilIilI!lIilIil -" .".. . I'
HSINYdS _ I
~'
'-'--.--- . .---
'~:
,
,
! ~~~~
: i:~~;l
,,' ~~g. - .
. ~~:5
: ,W
: I e:~~
.. i ,~~j
: r eH~
c'~lllii~
f i:~:~
: B C;~1
! U ~,
,
: c~
:1 I,
: ~ Ii ~4
J I ~~
..J, ~
:
',~
,
. '.
"~.II B
z
'<C
-'
..
~
o
it
I-
.,
g;
II.
;c
~
'I!
Y\
c
,
;J:
'-i
~
..~
,c'
'(\
AGENDA ITEM NO. L
PAGE S-9 Or ,11
Iii I ~.
"I; H I I lii:llii
I ,II: !. i'iGu
I!~I i I! ~!I
'I"fi I I I !hi
If~d,l ill' II ~
-13E1E1E1I3E1I3E](!l013 EI
I
~ < a :t: i iP~I. ~
H : Ii ~ OjI2QI. ':L! <(
~ ~ g ;~ 8 .. gl if;! l HB. . !I~ _.;j
j ~ Q .. j" ~ "I I HBI )~! i< U
~il:j k! d 'aUk P', f! I! I a'!! I~lil . ~Il ~ ~~~~ i
f"ijl h ilil is!;' I! i; ~ f i ! I I Ii illt,brdi~~~1 m ~ II I'
IU:1 ~ U_II~_ ! i . M ~H PI II !! nl~~~~~H~Ur ~ ~
Ii I!I' , · !I' U Ii j .! f I ~ n~~~~I~P'gP!f:i' !I: ~ ! .
ill -~~~I ~ilBI!t !ii!~!!!H!!l~ ~11~l~f~U~~f g iI-'i II
HSINYdS _ I
-------,
-'""""..... ,
, ,
,
,
4P- ,
J~ ,
,.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
-'
'-." I~ J3
.~
,
__~___1
~
13 : !
: 'a
' !
W
,
~ ~
-1>-11 i
a
4P-
"Z
.<
.j
Q.
a:
o
o
-'
...
c
Z
o
<>
w
co
~
U
~
'.
U
-,-
ACENDA fTE"l 1m. If
Pt.GE C, 0 OF ---=:L:L
(\
(\
(\
E-<
Z
o
~
~
~
\0
o
N
("")
Z
o
Z~
0<
~~
~4i
Ucs
<t;~
E-<I-<
f-<<
~~
CIl2
0<
~I-<
E-<~
<t;~
CIl<
t:Ofi:l
0>
UO
<t;g:
.....,~
~~
~;:J
;><8
0>
~~
~
t:O
~
CIl
o
~
<t;
~
~
Q
.. ~
" """'~..~._. ~.I
AGE;'~"";i,;;..I"O. Y
P"':g: r I OF .,
~"'i..'"- \0
f-
.....
tl:l
...J
ce:
-<
tl:l
ce:
U
-<
\0
o
('.l
('r)
z
Oz
>-~
z~
cJ~
-<I::
f-;~
f-;C5
~ce:
rr:Jf-
0-<
c.:::~
f-;~
-<;:; U..
rr:JZ
~-<
O~
U-<
f- -<Q
:r: -.~
"
@ ~~
-<~
~~
P:;6
;>-.>
~~
-<""
\/.l
o
et::
-<
......l
~
Q
.
U
ENDA ITE73 :!O.~
PAGE (0.;1 Of' I Lf
n
n
(\
E-<
5
~
~
~
\.0
o
N
~
z
~
5~
u
~~
u~
-<t:<
E-<~
t--<<
I:ilCll
enO
at:<
~;:;
r-<~
-<~
en<
~o
a~
u~
-<"-
.....,~
~~
-<::;l
o
~>
~~
:>-<
P=l
-<
en
a
~
-<
......:l
I:il
t:l
;"', ~
--",t} ,~
- ..,-,' \, '.1,0. ,~
AGE" VA "~,, ...... .....
I "3 0'- I
6<" PA~E 'C' ,'"
1-<
Z
o
p:::
~
()
U
\0
o
N
("')
z
o
z><
O~
~~
<t:!;:;
u~
<p::
1-<~
1-<<
~'"
Vlg
0<
p:::~ U
~~
C/.l<
g5~
ug
~~
<
f@~
<8
~>
o~
....p..
::><
o::l
<
C/.l
o
p:::
<
.....:l
i-L1
Cl
u
I AGENDA iTEi., rlO. ~ ~ \4
A~.~ (, \.f 0,
PVi:
('\
t-<
Z
o
~
~
Cl
\0
o
N
r<)
(\
z
o
>-
~~
~~
~~
U~
~~
t-<~
t-<<(
~en
(/)~
0<(
~I-<
t-<~
<~
(/)<(
a::lCl
O~
UO
~g:;
......~
@>-.
...:l.
en
<5
~>
o~:
~".
>--
a::l
<
(/)
o
~
<
....:!
~
~
('\
P/'~:J;~::
f:ml~ ~ s ~ i~~ ."~J iliill !PU ~
j~m; ~ '" " =so 0 rC)]" il!l . ~
lil!I;'!'!111111111I1 i~ ~ ~;~ 8 V~dl'l t Hii'ju;~
j 111111111111111.. l ~ .. j ~ W J If H J J ~~ J c(
.
ill, !i II ! ,I~ &1~lliJ~~m Ii lI!~ I~I~.II ~ 11'li
- 13E1E1813E1I3EH!lBI!I I!I B I!I El I!IEl ElI!I 00 1!l[!HilIilIilOOIilIilIilIiHi! -. . ... _ II
HSlNYdS _ I
.~"If i
" I
u
~
z
.
...J
Go
a:
o
o
...J
...
...
.,
a:
ii:
;c
.~
~
u
~
u
.,,"",.~
PACE G..b OF ., l.f
~:iol N 'I liP I
< 0 ~ .~H O,I/III!l ':"!. ~
J Q~ '" .:30 I ..,.".. ,I!i! '. g <(
z :s (j ..I!: lD .. ~ If" 1'" ~ ....
i:"I!I!",I!I"~,111 11II11111 J' ~ "'Q ~,.:~ 0 gl'" I .1.1. lil! ...f
r'\ ~ ,. jU g w,' fJI,.J ,J8 ,'<(I
(\ , 1111111.1111111/ ~ J.t! ElIl
lit ! f 'II i II h ! .j !lIt ~ I' h: ! I ~"'!! ~lil i. i!I' L ~~ .~~ i
I ! II 'I . 'Ii I ~Ii I~ . I I J II "I Llf'l l'r I~I.~I Iii l!l ~I il
II'I"! I ml I! I,UI WI j I U! f l; i!; Ilfilt~e 1I,'iH,~,q.D ~ :
Hi! II i I ~Ii; ! I "flllm I~n" . ~I! If: :, Ii H~~1 G If,> l~ w .:
il~I!lIllrll' L;Ufiill~IHliH!111 )II~ i 11.li
. GGGGG1388G8G G G G G GG G~ @ 1!l~l!llillilllillillillillillil il
: . HSlNYdS ~ I
'~'II i
. B
~
'13
p
,
,
,
, ,
z
<
....
"-
IX:
8
it
o
z
o
o
w
'"
:-:
~ .,
n
I
~
l
p
i~
,
--,
~
'I!
I' :
, ,
'r!J.
L_J
i~
~
(\
If-
PAvE "I 0;::: -, Lf
E-<
Z
o
~
[..l.;
u
<t;
f"-
00
"<:t
("<)
Z
o
z~
Ou
~~
<r:~
u..~
<t;~
E-<....
E-<<
P-'l;;5
1/JO
O~
~~
E-<~ U
<r:~
1/J<
o:lo
O~
UO
<t;~
........ ""
: f@ ~
<r:;g
~g
0>
I:.t.;~
:>-<
o::l
<r:
1/J
o
~
<r:
.....:l
P-'l
Cl
u
(\
(\
n
I-<
lil
-l
.~,
I-<
::r:
o
;, 02
,
X
l>':
~
l>':
--<
l'-
00
~
("f)
z
05
><;:...
z~
<t;u
U..:
I-<
--<~
f--<cn
f--<;2
~f-o
en..:
0..:
~CIl
f--<;2
--<;5
en~
~cn
Ocn
U":
--<0
>--.~
00
zg;
--<~
~~
ocn
~5
~
><>
""~
-g;
--<
en
o
~
--<
~
~.
o
.... l-~" "0 U
r~:.J;.'i H::t;'ll'~ ._--1--
PAGE 101( 0", ~
,,~ '" (\'-~::' -~ t,;~o.
ACEN;';r.'~_ I i '_I.: '
PAGE__(G OF
E-<
~
j:.l.,
u
a:l
r-
OO
'<:t
~
5
><
~~
~~
u~
<>>::
E-<~
E-<..:
~u>
en~
0..:
~f-<
E-<~ U
<r::~
en":
a:l@
0:>-
u~
<r::~
.......~
~~
<8
:x: >
~~
:><
a:l
<r::
en
o
~
-<
.....:l
~
o
u
y
,<If
(\
(\
n
"--''''.- ;-:,'",:::;,uiNO..
ACU\;_.iA i ~ !w'~~
",'~E II
~ . .-
t-<
Z
o
0:::
~
U
r-
oo
-.:t
(")
z
o
'><
Zz
0<
;>-<U
Z~
-<Gi
U(g
~I>::
t-<E-
E-<<
~;;j
enO
01>::
o:::~
t-<~
~~
en<
@3~
UO
~~
-. ~
o~
Zvl
-<;:J
'vi 0
r.;>
O~
~~
>-<
t::Q
~
en
o
0:::
:s
~
o
tt
OF -,~
I,
~
~
~
u
o
r-
oo
"<t
r<)
z
o
6~
u
~~
<Gi
U~
~~
E-<~
~'"
\/)~
0<(
~f-;
E-<~ U
<~
\/)<(
t:Qt:l
o~
Upe:
~~
0:>-
z~
<8
><;;;
5::~
>-
t:Q
<
\/)
~
j
~
o
u
. ITEi~NO.~
AGENi:lA . (;) OF ,
PAGE
(\
('\
n
CITY OF ~
LAI(B ,6,LSiNORE
, ~"'?', DREAM EXTREME.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
DRAFT CONDITIONS
RE: Residential Design Review No.'2006-18, Amendment No.1
,For "De La Rosa" by Centex Homes (Vesting Tract No..32503)
1 hereby state that VWe acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above
named project. I/We ,under,stand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree,
to accept and' abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff, ,
as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project
approval. ' ,
All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to, the first
Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicat~d in the Conditions, subject to the
approval of the Director of Community Development of the City of Lake Elsinore.' The
decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the
decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 17.80 of.the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). '
Date: \fJ!d-.1 JOlr
~~~dMV'~'
~e.. ~\M.\"eJ"'o..N'\
" \dCoS ~Nl. .(lO\~c..+
Cc.-er-.Q\ C' f\ Cf?.'lS'l 'L
~5\-41'-l-~30"l
Applicant's Signature:
Print Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
"
AGENDA ITE!d NO.~
PAGE {3 OF I
Notice of Determination
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore. CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
(951) 471-1419 fax
(In compliance with Section 21] 52
of the Public Resources Code)
u
Filed With: 0
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
181
County Clerk of Riverside County
2724 Gateway Drive
Riverside, CA 92507
Project Title:
Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment No.1, De La Rosa, Rosetta Canyon,
Vesting Tract Map. No. 32503
State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse): N/ A
Lead Agency Contact: Linda M, Miller, AICP, Project Planner Telephone No: (951) 674-3124 x 209
Project Location (include County):
County of Riverside, City of Lake Elsinore.
Amendment No.1 for Residential Design Review No. 2006-18 straddles Riverside Street and is west ofL.ister-Road and east
of Crumpton Street (APN's 349-610-006 thru 018, 349-611-001 thru 004, and 349-612-001 thru 022).
".' i
Project Description: The applicant requests to amend a' previously approved residential project known as De La Rosa br '\
Centex Homes. The amendment consists of a proposal to replace the existing De La Rosa products with approved product\"';
currendy being offered at "Fox and Jacobs at Rosetta Canyon" that are also Centex Homes products. These products will be
constructed on the remaining thirty-six (36) vacant lots within the sixty (60) lot De La Rosa Vesting Tract Map No. 32503.
I'
This is to advise that the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission (Lead Agency) has approved the above
project and has made the fol1owing determinations regarding the above described project:
Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment NO.1 does not propose substantial changes to Vesting Tract Map
No. 32503 for which Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-09 was prepared. No new significant environmental effects
or an increase in severity of previously identified significant effects are anticipated. No substantial changes have occurred
with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require major revisions to the
Mitigated Negative Declaration. No new information of substantial importance has come forward with respect to significant
effects or alternative mitigation measures that have not been addressed in the design of this project. .
. .
The Planning Commission has determined that Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment NO.1 is consistent
with and implements Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-09 for Vesting Tract Map No. 32503. Therefore, in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and pursuant to Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and
Negative Declarations, of said Act, the Planning Commission has determined that no further environmental documentation
for Residential Design Review No. 2006-18, Amendment NO.1 is necessary.
Signed:
Tide: Acting Director of Community Development
Tom Weiner
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4- U
PAGE..:ILOF ,If
n
(\
(\
CITY OF ~
LAKE ,&,LsiNOR&:
, ' ~~ DREAME,X'TREME.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
TOM WEINER,
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN, AND VESTING TENTATIV~ TRACT MAP NO.
35773 '
DATE:
PROJECT
,
,
APPLICANT:
KEN, CRAWFORD, KWC ENGINEERS, 1880 COMPTON
AVENUE, STE.100, CORONA, CA 92881
CASTLE &,COOKE ALBERHILL RANCH INC., 17600 COLLIER
AVENUE, SUITE C 120, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92539
OWNER:
Proiect Request
The request before the Planning Commission' is for the following discretionary
applications:
· NeQative Declaration No, 2008-12. Approval of Negative Declaration No, 2008-12 for
Amendment.No. 2 to the Murdock Alberhill.Ranch Specific Plan to allow for the re-
configuration of the neighborhood park site based upon the results of the Initial
Study, and based upon the standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15070,
. Amendment No. 2 to' the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. Approval of
Amendment NO.2 to the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan to allow for the re-
configuration of the neighborhood park site located at the easterriedge of the '
specific plan, in Sub-area uK" Specific Plan. '
· VestinQ Tentative Tract Map No. 35773. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 35773 for the subdivision of 19:81 acres of land into seventy two (72) single
family residential lots pursuant to Murdock Alberhill'Ranch Specific Plan Amendment
r~GErDA ITE;i;iiO. 5
PAGE I
~lf
.
C"
.,.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
No.2, Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and
Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act.
u
Proiect Location
The project area is located on the north side of Nichols Road, west of Collier Avenue,
within the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan.
Environmental SettinQ
The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan encompasses 511.4 acres in the City and
was originally adopted by the City Council in June, 1992. The Specific Plan consists of
a mix of single-family and multi-family residential housing, and a commercial site with a
multi-family residential overlay zone, resulting in a maximum of 1,819 dwelling units for .
the property. The Specific Plan also provides for an elementary school site, two public
park sites, six private parks, and open'space areas. The specific plan area incorporates
three separate properties (or Planning Areas) generally located adjacent to Lake Street
and Nichols Road, as shown in the attached exhibits.
In January 2004, two Vesting Tentative Tract Maps (VTTM) were approved for the
Specific Plan property: VTTM 28214 for Planning Area 1 and VTTM 30836 for Planning
Area 2. Development of the property to date has primarily occurred in Planning Area 1,
including the construction of infrastructure, the 22-acre Community Park, a Boys & Girls
Club center, dedication of an Elementary School site, and the construction of over 200
new single-family homes.
A previous Specific Plan Amendment (Amendment No.1) was approved by the City for
the property in December 2005. The amendment made various adjustments to. the
boundaries and densities within the Planning Sub-Areas, and relocated the elementary
u
AGENDA nE~,:j ;lO.
PAGE 2.
5
c: ({? I..(
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT .
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
n
school site per the school district's request The total number of units within the Specific
Plan and the overall residential density did not change as a result of Amendment NO.1.
The adopted Land Use Plan for the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan is shown in
the attached Exhibit 'A'.
The currently proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 seeks to modify the
configuration of the neighborhood park site located at the eastern edge of the specific
plan, in Sub-area "K". Amendment NO.2 does not alter the number of dwelling units,
land uses or density within the Specific Plan. Instead, the modified park site proposed
by Amendment No. 2 will enable a more efficient and desirable subdivision design for
VTTM 30836, while fulfilling the requirements for a neighborhood park site pursuant to
the Specific Plan..
Proiect Descriptions
, ,
, ,
, ,
Amendment No.2 to the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
[\
. ,
The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan contains two public park sites: a Community
Park site located in Rlanning Sub-area "L", and a Neighborhood Park site located in'
Planning Sub-area "K". The Neighborhood Park is currently designated as 10.8 gross
acres in area, as shown in, the adopted land use plan of the Specific Pian (Exhibit A)..
Proposed Amendment NO.2 reconfigures the park site boundaries to create a 4.8 gross :.
acre Neighborhood Park' site, as shown in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment
attached hereto and .identified as Plan,ning Areas &, Sub-areas, Land Use Plan and. '.
Parks & Open Space.. '
~. ., <"., ", . ' . . i >, " . -.' e " J
Pursuant to Section 7.3.4. (b) of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Pla'n, the..
Neighborhood Park site at this location is intended to be a passive park with trails and,
picnic areas, surrounded by natural open space. Access to the park site will occur off
Nichols Road via a local public street to be provided in conjunction with the
development of VTTM 30836. Active park areas within the specific plan are provided at
the 22-acre Community Park site and in association with several private parks being
developed within the neighborhoods.
The modification to the neighborhood, park site results. in a slight increase in the
adjacent RSF (Residential-Single Family) planning area "J", from 73,7 acres to 81.5
acres. Notwithstanding the additional acreage made available by the change to the
park, there will be no increase in the number of units allocated to this planning area.
The reconfigured park site allows for a more efficient utilization of the land area within
the adjacent single family residential planning area, and the ability to provide larger lot
areas, a more pleasing streetscape, and'reduced internal slope areas. VTTM 30836
has been modified to reflect these improvements in the overall design, yet remains in
substantial conformance with the originally approved tentative map. Table 1 below
[\ summarizes the change in park acreage as proposed in Amendment NO.2.
AGEi'iD,:;'ITE~,; [~O.
PAC~ ')
s
c," e '-1
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
u
Communit Park 22.4 22.4
Onsite Neighborhood- Park
10.8 4.8
Subtotal Public Parks: 33.2 ac. '27.2
+ Private Parks 7.1 7.1
TOTAL: 40.3 ac. 34.3
The proposed Amendment satisfies the City's Quimby Act parkland dedication
requirements, as outlined in Table 2 below. The City's park dedication formula is based.
upon a criterion of 5 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents.
The average number of persons per dwelling unit for the Mu'rdock Alberhil/ Ranch
Specific Plan area is set forth in Section 7.3 of the Specific Plan. Both the existing
Specific Plan and the proposed Amendment No. 2 exceed the amount of' park U
dedication required (as presented on pages 8? and 83 of Exhibit 'A') .
As shown in Table 2,' dedicati6n of the Community Park site has satisfied 22.4 of the
25.71 acres required under the Quimby Act. An additional 3.31 acres is required for
dedication as part of the Neighborhood Park. The proposed Amendment No. 2 meets
this requirement by providing 4.8 acres within the' Specific Plan boundaries (sub:'are'a
~. .
1,485 du 22.04 ac. 33.2 ac.
. .1,819 du
(wilh MF Overlay 25.71 ac. 33.2 ac.
o lion
TOTAL: 25.71 ac. 33.2 ac.
27.2 ac'
22.4 ac
Communi Park
27.2 ac.
22.4 ac
Communil Park
27.2 ac.
22.4 ac.
.,
u
.~.'~' 'T~'" ,.!.'" 5
r..... "-'.'~~' "v. '1
.C~...... 6
r." .":': 0;; __
r-f~''-''~.'.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773. ..
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
n
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773.
The Vesting Tentative Tract Map. proposes seventy two (72) single. family residential'
lots. The proposed residential lots range in size from 5,500 square feet to 16,196
square feet, with an average lot size of 8,920 square feet. Staff has determined that the'
Vesting Tentative Tract Map complies the Residential Single-Family (RSF) District of
the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map
Act. .
The proposed subdivision is located within, and regulated by, the Murdock Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan., The Specific Plan intends for those uses proposed with the,
Vesting 'Tentative Tract Map, including detached single-family residential development
and open space areas, to be constructed within the identified Planning Area location.
The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map does not conflict with the intended land uses
and their respective locations, nor does the map conflict with the standards, objectives,
and guidelines contained in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan.
Since the applicant is only considering subdivision of the project site, architectural
and/or- building plans for future' residences;.plotting plans, preliminary wall and fence,
plans, etc, are not proposed' at this time. ,These issues will be addressed when the
applicant submits for Design Review approval in the future.
(\
Analvsis
-,: .
Amendment No.2 to the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
City Planning and Engineering staffs have're'viewed the Specific Plan Amendment NO.2
document and have no concerns regarding the requested re-configuration of the
neighborhood park site. The modified park area does not alter the number of dwelling
units, land uses or density within the Specific Plan. The modification of the park site as
proposed in Amendment No.2 will enable a more efficient and 'desirable subdivision
design for VTTM 30836, while still fulfilling the requirements for a neighborhood park
site pursuant to the Specific Plan.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 '
City Planning and Engineering staffs have reviewed the proposed Vesting Tentative
Tract Map and have no concerns, if required conditions of approval are satisfied. The
proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with development standards
contained in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No, 2 document in
terms of lot size, street widths, and other 'Planning and Engineering standards and
requirements. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map area is located within Planning Area
n No.2, which has an underlying zoning of Residential Single Family (RSF). The
A.GE~'~.DJ~ rn:~~:1 NO.
PAGE '\
c:;
Of' e~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
proposed project is consistent with the RSF designation. The Vesting Tentative Tract
Map is consistent with Sections 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act,
and Section 16 "Subdivisions. of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
u
Environmental Determination
Amendment No.2 to the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2008-12 has been prepared pursuant
to Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process) and Section 15070 (Decision to Prepare a
Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Based on staff's evaluation, the proposed project will, not result in any
significant effect on the environment. Further, pursuant to Section 15073 (Public
Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Negative Declaration was submitted
to the State Clearinghouse on September 2, 2008 for twenty (20) day review period.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773
Environmental clearance for the requested Vesting Tentative Tract Map is provided by
Addendum NO.2 to the Final Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan EIR.
Recommendations
u
a. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution adopting findings that the project is
consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and
b. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution approving Negative Declaration No.
2008-12, and
c. Waive further reading. and adopt a resolution recommending City Council
approval of Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.2, and
d. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution recommending City Council
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 for based on the Findings,
Exhibits, and proposed Conditions of Approval
Prepared by: .
Kirt A. Coury, .
Project Planner
Tom Weiner,~
Acting Director of Community Development
Approved by: .
u
r. '*-~~''''''1~ f""-::'~,~ "If'\
'""""":""'\'"''0'''
PAGE
s-
O;: e~
n
n
r'-
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolutions
3. Conditions of Approval
4. Exhibits:
'A': Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2
'S': Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 (reduction)
'C': Negative Declaration No. 2008-12
'D': Full Size Plans
.~.
p.::r:.[rJ[:.l'~C7~ r~o. '.5
PACE 7 Gi' <Q '1
c u b
c.. ~
,2 ~ 0
\ttS Q '"
iii "" '"
u g", ~
<( 0 u~ U
-' ~ 0 U)
~
~oc U
~o
~z !E
~ !II;;;
u~ ~
~
~
~
5 b
>-
I-
-
Z w ~I
- 0
;;;~
() h Be
ocZ ~i=
5
~oc
- Ou ~ 3~
z
> /O';!
Z
~- ,r-l
0 e !o
u ue :z:
'"
is
oc
1,
$
~~
o
Z
Ol
~~
'" ,
85v
uz-
~~~
~ oj '
~~~
"l
<
~
.
u
~
fh
I'!
u
~
o
o
oc
oc
i
wZ
~u
3~
~OJ
~~
u:t
3
u
~
~
~
f~' [}~J/':;. ~1;:':;1 :~O.
v_
b
o
..
..
s-
('.
('.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
..,
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
NO. 2008-12 FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ALBERHILL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN. ,
WHEREAS, Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch Inc., (the "Developer"), filed an
application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Amendment No: 2 to
the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan'and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773'
(the "Project") for the re-configuration 'of the neighborhood park site and the subdivision
of 19.81 acres of land into seventy two (72) single family residential lots (the "Property:');
and
WHEREAS, the. Project is ."subject. to the' provisions of' the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code SS 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the
State Implementation Guidelines for ,CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations SS"
15000" et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may
cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a'lease,
permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies
(Public Resources Code S 21065); and . " .
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the','
environment. The Initial Study revealed that the project would not have potentially
significant environmental impacts; and '
WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Initial Study, and based upon the
standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, it was determined appropriate to
prepare and circulate Negative Declaration No. 2008-12 for the Project (the "Negative
Declaration");,and .
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15072, on September 2,
2008, the City duly issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt the NegativeDeclaration; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15073, the Negative
Declaration was made available for public review and comment for twenty (20) days
beginning on September 2,2008, and ending on September 22,2008, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
regarding negative declarations; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project and the Negative Declaration have been
('. given, and the Planning Commission. has considered evidence' presented by the
1 '
Agenda Ile91No.~
Page -L of~
PLANNING COM MIS ION RESOLUTION 200B-_
PAGE 2 OF 3
Community Development Department and other inten:isted parties at a public hearing U
held with respect to this item on November 4, 2008.
. ',. . '
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated into thes? findings by this reference.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has evaluated all comments, written and
oral, received from. persons who have reviewed the Negative Declaration. Written
responses to comments received on the Negative Declaration during the public
comment period were prepared and circulated. The Planning Commission hereby finds
and determines that all public comments have been addressed.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
that the Negative Declarationfor the Project is adequate and has been completed in
accordance with CEQA, the. State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for.
implementation of CEQA. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the .
information contained in the . Negative Declaration and finds that the. Negative
Declaration represents the independent judgment of the City.
SECTION 4. The Planning Commission further finds and determines that none
of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring recirculation U'
of" the Negative Declaration are present and that it would be appropriate to adopt the
Negative Declaration as proposed.
SECTION 5. The Planning Commission hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates
the following findings regarding the Negative Declaration:
1. Revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the .
applicant before a Negative Declaration and Initial Study are released for:
public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to. a point
where clearly no significant effects would occur.
Based upon the Initial Study conducted for the Project, there is substantial
evidence suggesting that all potential impacts to the environment resulting
from the Project. are less than/significant: .
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record .before
the agency, that the Project as revised may have significant effect on the
environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received, and in the light of the whole record
presented, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. Based upon the.evidence presented, the .above findings, and the U
conditions of approval attached to the Resolution approving Murdock Alberhill Ranch
2
Agenda Item No. 5
Page 1JL of ~
(',
("\
(',
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008-_
PAGE 3 OF 3
Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773, the
Planning Commission hereby recommends tha~ the City Council approve Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2008-12. . . .
SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage
and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED,onthis4th day of November 2008.
. AxelZanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss.
)
I" TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Community Development of the City ofLake
Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. . 2008- was adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
the 4th day of November 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner ....
Acting Director of Community Development
3
Agenda Item No. C;
Page 1L of ::J2:t
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE. CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE
. MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
AND SUBDIVISION ARE EXEMPT FROM' THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
u
WHEREAS, Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch, Inc., has filed an application with
the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
Amendment No.2 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773, which proposes to re-
configure a public park located in Planning Area 2 and subdivides 19.81 acres of land
into seventy two (72) single family residential lots within the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan (the "Project"); and . .
WHEREAS, Section IV(D) of the City of Lake Elsinore's MSHCP Implementing
Resolution expressly exempts from the MSHCP:
Any project for which and to the extent that vested rights to proceed with
the project notwithstanding the enactment of this Resolution exist under
the common laws of the State of California, a vesting tentative map
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, a development agreement pursuant
to Government Code section 65864 et seq., or other instrument, approved
or executed by the City prior to adoption of this Resolution. Projects
subject to this exemption must comply with all provisions of any applicable
state and federal law.
u
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on November 4, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE'
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its
exemption from the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" prior to making findings that the
project is indeed exempt. .
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the
MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must
make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
The Project is exempt from the City's MSHCP Resolution. In February, 2004, the
County of Riverside and Castle & Cooke/Murdock Alberhill Ranch entered into a
Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement'), which expressly exempted U
AG[NI}:~ iT[U f'JO.
PAce I.,)..
5
Of 8' '-1_
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 200S-_
PAGE 2 OF 4
the Developer froin responsibility for any new Habitat Conservation Plan
requirements. .
. ,
Even though the Project is exempt from the MSHCP, the Developer must comply
with other state and federal laws. Consistent with federal law, the applicant had
prepared a project-specific Habitat Conservation Plan and has a history of
extensive coordination with the wildlife agencies. Where approved for
development, the project site has already been graded, cleared, or developed in
accordance with the Project HCP. Given the foregoing, no further action
regarding the MSCHP is required.
2. The proposed project is subject to the City:s LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
See Response #1 above. .
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pools Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant "
Species Guidelines. .
See Response #1 above.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the UrbanlWildlands Interface
Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
See Response #1 above.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures.
See Response #1 above.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
Developer is exempt from payment of the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee by virtue ofthe Deve/opment Agreement.
10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP.
See Response #1 above.
AGENDA liE,; 110.
PAGE. I 3
5
Of' 8 \.(
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
PAGE 3 OF 4
SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented,the.above findings, and the U
attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council find that the Project is exempt from the MSHCP.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 4th day of November 2008.
Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
u
u
ACEfWP, !TE:,; "0. 5
PAGE {t[ OF 8 t...c
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
PAGE 4 OF 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss.
)
I, TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Community Development of the City of Lake
Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008- was adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
the 4th day of November 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
AGENDJ\ 11Er,1 tJO. C;
PAGE I 5 OF 8 '1
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN
u
WHEREAS, Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch, Inc., has filed an application with
the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Murdock
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the 511-acre Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan site is generally
bounded by the 1-15 Freeway to the north, Terra Cotta Road/Nichols Road to the south,
EI Toro Road/Collier Avenue to the east, and Lake Street to the west; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for
approval,of specific plans and any amendments thereto; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on November 4, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
u
SECTION 1. Prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning
Commission has reviewed and analyzed Amendment No. 2 to the Murdock Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code SS
65000 et seq.) and Chapter 17.99 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC").
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings
for the approval of Amendment NO.2 to the Murdock Alberhill RanchSpecific Plan:
1.
The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent
with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other
applicable plan or policies adopted by the City.
The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 meets the
City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the
General Plan established by Section 65450 et seq. of the California
Government Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No.
2 complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the
planning district in which the site is located.
u
ACElI!DA ITEf,J flO.
PACE ("
s-
Ol' -.B 'f
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-
PAGE20F4 ' -
('\
(1
[\
2. 'The proposed location shall allow the development to be well-integrated
with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the
. case. ' ,
The Projecfis appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in
that implementation of the Project wil(iesult in the re-configuration of the
neighborhood park site. The modifiedpark area does not alter the number
, of dwelling wiits, land uses or density within the Specific plan. Instead,
the 'modification ,of the park site as proposed in Amendment No. 2 will
enable a more efficient and desirable subdivision design for VTTM 30836,
while fulfilling ttie reciuirements for, a neighborhood park site pursuant to
the SpecificPlan.' .' . .
3. All vehicular traffic generated by' the development,' either in phased
increments or at full b'uild-out, is to be accommodated safely and without
causing undue'congestion upon adjoini'ng streets.' , .,'
, The width 'and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of
traffic generated that' will "result' from implementation of the Murdock
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No, 2 has been reviewed and
, accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be senied by roads
, of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access
by car, truck, 'transit, and bicycle. '
, ,
4.
The Specific Plan Amendment shall identify a' methodology(s) to allow
land uses to be adequately serviced, by existing or proposed public
facilities and services. '. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided
elsewhere by City Code, the City may require that suitable areas be
reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces
shall be ,dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of
residents, establishments or operations in the development. '
The Murd~ck Alberhill Ranch'Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 identifies
methodologies to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or
proposed public facilities and services. The Specific Plan Amendment No.
2 identifies necessary streets and circulation tO,support the proposed land
use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper'
and adequate infrastructure services. In addition, the Final Specific Plan
Amendment No. 2 identifies community and neighborhood parks for
common use of, the.. residents, public schools, and open space for
dedication and preservation.
5. The overall design of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 will produce an
attractive, efficient and stable development.
ACEr~DA IrE,l !lO. c;-
PACE {, 01' 8 '1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
PAGE 3 OF 4
'The proposed Murdock'Alberhill RanchSpecific' Plan Amendment No. 2 U
' has been, designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property,
thereby, strengthening and enhancing the immediate areas: The Project
will complement .the quality of neighboring existing ,and future uses by
creating visually-pleasing development. ' ,
. The Murdock Alberhill RanchSpecific Plan Amendment Nq. 2 will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons
residing or working near the Project or within the City" nor will it be
. inju'rious to property or improvements in the project ~rea or within the City.
In addition, staff has substantiated that all applicable, City, Departments
and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity fora thorough review of
, the Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 and have incorporated all applicable
comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of
landscaping,' street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress
and egress and control of potential nuisanceS. so' as to eliminate any
negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare
of the surrounding neighborhooClor the City.
6. In 'accordance with the requirements' of. the California Environmental
Quality Ad (CEQA), impacts have been reduCed to ,a level of non-
significance, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of
overriding considerations must 'be adopted to justify the merits of project
"implementation. " . U
'In accordance withCEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City prepared an
'Initial Study for the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.
2: " The Initial Study revealed that the project would not have potentially
significant environmental' impacts. It was determined appropriate to
. prepare and circulate Negative Declaration' No. 2008-12 for the Project
(State Clearinghouse No. '88090517) to address. the proposed park
changes under Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 Negative Declaration No.
2008"12 is adequate and is prepared in accordance with the requirements
of CEQA.' .
:'"
SECTION 3. Based upon all of'the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the' conditions of approval imposed upon the ProjeCt, the Planning Commission hereby
approves Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
ACENDA ITEM(~O.
PAGE' ~
u
S-
OF 8 q-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
PAGE 4 OF 4
. I
(\ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 4th day of November 2008.
(\
(\
Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of lake Elsinore .
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner'
Acting Director of. Community Development
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss:
)
,
I, TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Commi.mity'Development of the City of lake
Elsinore, California, hereby.certify that Resolution No. 2008-' . was adopted'
by the Planning Commission of the City of lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on'
the 4th day of November 2008, and that the same .was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner
Acting DireCtor of Community Development
AGENDA m:;.; rlO.
PAGE 19
S
01' [J'i
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
u
WHEREAS, Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch, Inc., (the "Developer"), filed an
application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 35773, which subdivides 19.81 acres of land within the Murdock Alberhill..
Ranch Specific Plan into seventy two (72) residential lots (the "Subdivision"); and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision is located within the Murdock Alberhill. Ranch
Specific Plan (Planning Area No.2), which is located on the north side of Nichols Road,
west of Collier Avenue. Direct access to the Specific' Plan area is from Nichols Road.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 is located near the northern portion of the
identified Planning Area No.2; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making. recommendations to the City Council'
pertaining to the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code SS 21000 et seq:: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et
seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork
associated with. the implementation ofCEQA by using previously prepared U
environmental documents when those' previously prepared documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has
been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or
negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or
a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows U
any of the following:
AGENDA me;;; ,,0.
PAGE ;) 0
5
u" 8'1
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008~~
PAGE 2 OF 4
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the.
previous EIR or negative declaration; .
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more sever
than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not the be feasible
would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or ' '. .
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are ~onsiderably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative."; and . ". .
WHEREAS, Addendum No.2 to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report,
State Clearinghouse No. 88090517 (the "FEIR'')" for the Alberhill Ranch Specific'Plan
was prepared and approved by the City Council in June 1992 to provide environmental
analysis and information necessary to support approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Maps
28214 and 30836; and .
WHEREAS, the Subdivision was contemplated by Specific Plan Amendment No.
2 and does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential
environmental impacts that were analyzed in the FEIR or the changes addressed in
Addendum No 2; and . .
WHEREAS, public notice of the Subdivision has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on November 4, 2008. . . .
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING'COMMISSIC>N OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Subdivision prior to
making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the application. The
Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Subdivision complies with
the requirements of Title '16 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in accordance
with CEQA Guidelines Section 1.5162, the .Subdivision does not present a substantial
change or new information that would require further CEQA analysis., The
environmental impacts associated with Subdivision were contemplated by the FEIR and
were fully analyzed and mitigated therein. No new CEQA documentation is necessary
for the Subdivision.
^~,...", ._",., "'0 C--
I__~""',~.'~....;'\ t, :-hl ~\i. ::>
P~G~~OF B~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008"_ ,
PAGE30F4
SECTION 3. That in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and requirements
of the lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission. makes the following U
findings for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773:
1. The Subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code
relating to Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2 designates the Subdivision
site as Residential Single Family (RSF). Consistent with that designation, the
Subdivision will accommodate a single-family residential project with a density of up
to four (4) dwelling units per acre. The Subdivisio~ is consistent with the designated
land use, development and design standards, 'and all other appropriate requirements
contained in the General Plan, Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment
No.2, and Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5)".
The Subdivision is consistent with the land use plan, development and design
standards and programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the' .
General Plan and Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2.
. Tentative Tract Map No. 35773. is consistent with the RSF designation and
applicable development and design standards.
3. The effects this Subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needsof the region,
the public service requirements of its residents, and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
u
The Subdivision is consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and'the
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2. The Subdivision will
provide necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will
not result in any adverse environment?1 impact.
4. The design' of the Subdivision provides .to the greatest extent possible, for future
passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government
Code Section 66412.3).
The Subdivision will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the .
City and Uniform Building Code. . .
SECTION 4~ Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the .conditions of approval imposed upon the subdivision, the Planning Commission
hereby recommends that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
35773. .
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after' the date of" its
passage and adoption. U
, . I'-'co, pc>
AGEi'\lD.>\ i l,;.~. ~'V.
PAGE J::L
,-
OF B '1 _
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008-_
PAGE 4 OF 4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED 011 this 4th day of November 2008.
Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'
, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
)
)ss.
)
I, TOM WEINER, Acting Director of Community Development of the City of Lake
Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008- was adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
the 4th day of November 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
ACENDA IT[;,,1 ~JO. C)
PAce.;):3 ' Or ~ 'i
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
u
GENERAL
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its Officials, Officers; Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set
aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards,. or
legislative body concerning Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 and
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773, located on the north side of Nichols Road, west of
Collier Avenue within the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (Planning Area 2), project
attached hereto.
PLANNING DIVISION
MURDOCK ALBERHILlL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
2. The Draft Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No: 2 shall be revised to
incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City
Council. A Final Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2 document shall
be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee
within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the Murdock
Adlbe~hill R.ancl h Plan Admbendhmecnt No. .2 Ddocument find any required revisions are U
a mlnlstratlve y approve y t. E! omrnumty. evelopment Director or designee.
3. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines of the Elements
contained in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan document.
4. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan Amendment No.2 will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code
in effect at the time the associated Vesting Tentative Tract Map is approved.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
5. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 will expire two years from date of approval unless
within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an
extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with
the Subdivision Map Act.
6. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) in effect on the date
of approval of VTTM 35773, unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval.
7. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Lighting and Landscape
and Street Maintenance District, as appropriate.
u
AGEr\\DA ITGi1 NO.
PAGE ;) 'f OF
5
[';"1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 2 OF 6
("\ MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
8. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described.
in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan document and Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 35773.
9. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in the 1989 Final
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan EIR and the 1992 Addendum to the Final Murdock
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan EIR.
10. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Department.
Future construction shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire
protection and any additional requireme~ts requested by the County Fire Department.
PRIOR TO FINAL TRACT MAP
. . , .
12.AII lots shall comply with minimum standards contained in the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan.
13.A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC.
n
14.Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development
Director or Designee.
15.AII of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the.
specifications of the City ofLake Elsinore. ' .
16. The applicant' shall meet all requirements of 'Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
(EVMWD).
PRIOR TO DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL'
17.AII future structural development associated with this map requires separate Design
Review approval.
18. Design for all drainage basins proposed with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 35773 shall
be approved by the City Engineering Manager and Community Development Director or
designee. Security fencing shall also be shown. ,Chain-link fencing is prohibited.
. .
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT/GRADING PERMITS
19. Prior to issuance of any grading permit and/or building permit, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
n . Community Development Department.
ACE"""'-'C-;' r50 5
- l~t.I."'\ 1L..,.j.... ..
PACE ~ S-- \ii' B '"1_
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 3 OF 6
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773
u
20. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other
entitlements, where applicable, priorto each phase of development of the project.
21. Prior to issuance of building permit, a Fuel Modification Plan and Program shall be
approved by the Fire Department for future development. Said Plan and Program shall
show those special treatments necessary to achieve an acceptable level of risk in regard to
. the exposure of structures to flammable vegetation and shall describe the method. of
removal and installation, and provisions for maintenance. The City's Landscape Architect
. shall ensure compliance of said program.
22. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-
serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services.
23. The subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall create a Homeowners Association for the
maintenance of common property within the subdivision, or annex into the existing Murdock
Alberhill Ranch Homeowner's Association. .
24. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the appropriate
School District prior to issuance of building permits.
25. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision.
No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on
engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD.
28. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street
lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be
the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by
the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards.
29.A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction.
30. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation.
,
u
31. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will
require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated
recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet
the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning
Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet shall be provided. Interim
and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for
material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough
graded.
32.The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all site preparation activity. Construction
shall not commence before 7:00 AM and cease' at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday.
Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
u
ACEr'~DA rn:~~1 r~o.
P~GE ~
5
Or ~ "1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 4 OF 6
('\ MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN,AMENDMENT NO:2 '
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773 ' ,
33. The applicant shall place a weatherproof'3' x3' sign at the entrance to the project site
identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity (i.e., 7:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday with no construction aCtivity to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or
legal holidays) and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with
the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be
installed prior to the issuance of a' grading ,permit: ' -
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
34.0pen space lots shall be retained .bythe applicant or dedicated to' a Conservancy.
Maintenance of these open space lots shall be the responsibility of either the Conservancy
and/or HOA.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
35. Maximum cul-de-sac length is 600- feet., Provide secondary access to "P" Street. The
Secondary access shall be approved by the Fire Department.
36, Roadway width of Street '~O"and Street "P" shall be'40-feet of pavement on 54-feet of right-
('\ of-way, per Section 5.9.6 and 5.9.7 of the MurdockAlberhill Ranch Specific Plan. If "P"
Street is revised to conform to the 600-foot maximum length for a cul-de-sac, the roadway
width is allowed to be reduced to the City standard for cul-de-sacs.
37. All cut slopes shall be at a rate of 2:1 unless otherwise approved by the City 'Engineer.
38.Provide Drainage Easements and overland release of water that is conveyed through a
private lots. ',. , '
39. Provide access and access easement to lot "C" for maintenance:
: I.
40. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside CountY Standards and on
the centerline of "P" Street:at the intersection of "0" Street and at the easterly knuckle of
"N" Street.
41. Curb inlets shall be sized to capture storm flowing along a 10% grade. . '
42. Provide details of all basins shown at the top of the slopes including an: emergency,
overland path to convey the drainage.
, ' ,
43.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall
be contained' within, the street right-of-way,' , If either of these criteria are exceeded,
drainage facilities shall be designed and constructed.
('\
ACa;ri0}:1.1TL:~~ fiG.
PAGE :>-,
s-
OF 8'1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 5 OF 6
MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773.
u
44; All drainage improvements shall be constructed to City of Lake Elsinore Standards. Where.
the City Standard does not exist, the facility. shall. meet Riverside County Standards.
. Facilities larger than 36-inches in diameter shall. be constructed to Riverside County
, Stal1dards.
. , .
45.AIl compaction reports, grade certifications,. monument. ,certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 y," x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final
inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved.
46. Slope maintenance along right-of-ways and open spaces shall be maintained by a property
. owner's association or other maintenance mechanism approved by the City. .
47.AIl waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning,
demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at
appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling
and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling
vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for
bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling
services and . the recycling material is either sold or donated to. another vendor, the
applicant shall supply proof of debris disposaL at a.recycling center, including verification of U
. tonnage by certified weigh master tickets.
..
48. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property
owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement.
49.AIl natural drainage traversing. the site .shall be conveyed through the'site, or shall be
collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
50. Dedicate full width right-of-way and constructfull. width ,street improvements for "P" Street,
"0" Street, and "N" Streets. The improvements include ac pavement, curb and gutter,
, sidewalk, street lighting, and signing and striping. Adequate ac transition beyond project
limits shall.be provided. In addition, adequate drainage protection shall be provided at the
end of the transition area.
51. The applicant shall, obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits' for off-site
grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading
permit issuance. , .'
52. Submit a ''Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water
agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and
. specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and
volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying Jor a building permit.
u
",,,"n' ,-r',' no 5
A\Ji:.r~~M. ij I ii.:hl ~II.. .. ~
Pf,OE ::L '0 OF t, "1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 6 OF 6
(\ MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPEciFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35773 .
53.AII public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as
conditions of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
54.AII required easements, dedications, or vacation as conditions of this development shall be
completed and recorded.
55. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District
requirements. .
56, Proof of maintenance responsibility and acceptance shall be provided for all open space,
slopes, and drainage facilities, outside the public right-of-way. All documents in support of
this requirement shall be recorded with the County Recorder's office.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
57. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit
or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape .
Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on .
public right-of~way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City .
(\' and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a.
maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. Applicant shall make a four thousand
seven hundred dollar ($4,700) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation
process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900 x334 or
danderson@.harris-assoc.com. .
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
58. The Developer shall pay all applicable park fees pursuant to the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
Development Agreement.
59. Developer shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and
recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore'Municipal Code.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
60. The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Departments requirements and
standards. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County
Fire Department. .
(\
AGt:ND.~, rn::u f,JO.
PAGE ;),"1
s
00' ~ '1_
--,--..--.....~---::::::::;;:;.:::...~-----~:
, , r: r{;j)j
i , I
~ Hi . I"
il ,I l
d; ~
" ~ "!
Ii !l
11 il,
.... . ~ '!'
i ~~ " ~!.l
~~ .
,
;'1"
'~AQ ~
\1"11, .
flb,!.l
5t~Q l ~!~
'1'1-1'
~ ~ ~~~
i"hli'
I"lh,' .
II:!!
.,
~ a':!
~
~
l'<)
~1;!l
b~
~.~
I;:::~
~ ~'
~~
~~ .
~~
I;::::~
~~
~
~
~~
~ g
.!
l
,
i.
ii
\.
J '
!~
\:i' - r ~
~
&~
~~ .
'c
~
~
,i
\i~
~c
~
'I~~
ult
"l'
11.1
II jl
!~ !~
-I' 'il'i:i
!!:!! Ii'! !Ii~l
~ ..,,,!iI,,IIG
-; .1 ~ ~'
~ i' i :;~
," !~~~
I i ~~~
h! Ii! i,,' ,!Ii
"",',11' 'j
!'!I!!'!!iEl'lj'!,'1
,I< ,\.,>1 !lb
,
.
.~t
~...~
! II.!
.I~ ~~ u
~I I
<l~ I
"
"~
~-
il"
.
-,
. h~
~ ~ ~I' ~
lil "- ~
~ ,,~ J.
>.!Ii ~ &l;l~
~ ~ ~~~
!.l .1 ~.
~.
'L
. ~ i
:,
0"
.. ~'''''
""
EX~flBrr //:SR""----
,- n ',,;y ;.'''' --,'
';"'~',q'''l.
.
'~->~:-:':;Ii f. ;:
PACE 3CJ OF '1
5
u
Ii
.1
,
I'
k ,I
~~
~~ . II. .
(-~~;s~Z9r
Ii;
: ,I
Ii
Ii
'1
Ii
,I
I'
.1
u
(\
(\
(\
FINAL
INITIAL STUDY/
NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 2008-12
State Clearinghouse No. 88090517
MURDOCKALBERHILL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
Lake Elsinore, California.
:.,
Prepared By:
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Applicant:
Castle and Cooke - Alberhill Ranch, Inc.
17600 Collier Avenue, Suite C120
Lake Elsinore, CA 92651
September 2008
EXHtBff ' (r-'
AGErm,'1 1Tl,;,J :W.
PACE3LCr 8 y
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
u
SECfION 1.0 INTRODUCflON AND SUMMARy................................................. 1-1
SECflON 2.0 CORRECflONS AND ADDITIONS .................................................2-1
2.1 REVISED AND SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT ................................................2-1
SECfION 3.0 RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS .......................................3-1
Tables
Table 3-1.
Comment Letters - Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan Amendment NO.2 Draft
IS/ND (September2008) .....................................................................................3-1
Att;achment
Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration No. 2008-12 for Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan
Amendment NO.2
u
u
Murdock Alberhill SPA NO.2
Final [SIND
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008
A,""...",~n ,.,.,"", "0 5
\,IL~\i~'M ~ I c.;. III . ..
PAGE_3L_oFuJ2\..f _
(\
(\
(1
Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank.
.,
Murdock A1berhill SPA NO.2
FinallSIND
II
City of Lake Elsinore, j
September 2008 ~
I"' 1'.1.71":....,'). l-l:'".tt: r"Jo. 5
j,~,.n.~,'~,,-,j).. ....,..' "1
PAGE 3~ OF C8 -
1.0 Introduction and Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
u
This Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration (IS/NO) has been prepared in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq.), the CEQA Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et
seq.), and the City of Lake Elsinore CEQA procedures.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b) and (d) state:
"(b) Prior to approving a project, the decision making body of the lead agency
. shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process. The decision making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration
or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record
before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration
reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis."
"(d) When adopting a mitigated negative declaration, the lead agency shall also
adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either
required in the project or made a condition of approval to mitigate or avoid
significant environmental effects."
In accordance with this requirement, Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan Amendment No.2 IS/NO U
is comprised of the following:
. Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration, August 2008 (SCH No. 88090517)
. This Final IS/NO document, September 2008, that incorporates the information
required by Section 15074 (included in this document)
Format of the Final IS/MND
This document is organized as follows:
Section 1.0 Introduction and Summary
This section describes CEQA requirements and content of this Final IS/NO.
Section 2.0 Corrections and Additions
This section provides a list of those revisions made to the Draft IS/NO text as
a result of comments received and/or errors and omissions discovered
subsequent to release of the Draft IS/NO for public review.
u
Murdock A1berhill SPA NO.2
Final [SIND
1-1
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008 5
ACENDA IT~?';t ~'J;J.
PAGE. 3'1 0;' ?J 'i
(\
n
(\
1.0 Introduction and Summary
Section 3.0 Responses to Comment Letters Received on the Draft IS/ND
This section provides copies of the comment letters received and individual-
responses to written comments. _ _,
Murdock A1berhiII SPA No.2
FinollSIND
}-2
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008
AIT-..r"o
AGEND ; ",,-; '" .
PACE "3~"" 01'
5'f
e
City of Lake Elsinore
., .s~,*,~r'lOo8 5
AGEMlA: Ii ~.., ..V,,. ~ Y
PACE '310 o~-
2.0 Corrections and Additions
2.0 CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS
This section contains revisions to information included in the Draft IS/NO (September 2008)
based upon additional or revised information required to prepare a response to a specific
comment. Please see copies of the letters and responses in Section 3.0, Responses and
Comments of this Final IS/NO, as applicable.
2.1 REVISED AND SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT
Changes to the Draft IS/NO were made either in response to comments received on the Draft
IS/NO or made to better clarifY the information and analysis presented in the text. Text that
has been added to the document appears in an underline format. Text that has been deleted
appears with strikeout.
The table below identifies the changed IS/NO page numbers in the Final IS/NO. The revised
IS/NO is included following this IS/NO Introduction. None of the changes to the Draft IS/NO
were substantial in nature. The changes do not meet the requirements for recirculation of a
negative declaration, as described in Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The changes
would not be characterized as a substantial revision that identifY a new, avoidable significant
impact.
Final MND Section Page Numbers
1. Introduction 4
Findings 38
One. other change to note is the removal of Vested Tentative Tract Map (VITM) No. 35773 from
the listed entitlements on page 6 of the Draft MND, Project Description. It was not the intent of
this MND to evaluate the VITM. It is being processed through the City separately and is
anticipated to be covered under previous CEQA documentation and other planning approvals.
Murdock A1berhiII SPA NO.2
Final [SIND
2-1
u
u
u
(\ 3.0 RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS
(\
(\
, .
., .
: ~ "
Murdock A1berhill SPA NO.2'
FinaIIS/ND
3-1
City of Lake Elsinore
ACE~'B'X~fJ?f3.
PAGE 3,
5
OF e '1
3.0 Responses to Written Comments
3.0 RESPONSES TO WRITTENCOMMENTS
'U
Section 3.0 contains responses to all comment letters received on the August 2008 Draft
ISjMND. A total of 3 comment letters were received during the comment period, which
closed September 22, 2008, as detailed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1
Conunent Letters - Greenwald Avenue Conunercial Center Draft IS/MND (August 2008)
Number Letter Preparer Date
1 Pala Band of Mission Indians 9/9/08
2 Soboba Band of Luiseoo Indians 9/10/08
3 Morongo Band of Mission Indians 9/4/08
The City has prepared the following responses to all of the comment letters received.
Please note that the comment letter follows the responses from the City.
U
.
u
Murdock Alberhill SPA No.2
Final IS/ND
3-1
City of'Lake Elsinore
n ,~"",..n IT,~~~Il'l')IIber 2008 5
t~\.ILh;i.l1't .I.:.~~ ~uU.
PAGE. 3'a OF 8 "1
. 3.0 Responses to Written Comments
. Letter 1.- Pala Band of Mission Indians
n This letter stat~ that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the
recognized Pala liulian Reservation, and also beyond the boundaries of the Tribe's
Traditional Use Area. No reSponse is required.
n
n
MurdockAlberhill SPA NO.2
Final [SIND
3-2
City of Lake Elsinore
SeJ?tember 2008
AGE~'ivA rra~'l r~o.
PAOE ~ '1 0;:
5
~'-1
PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
35008 Pala Temecula Rd. PMB 50
Pala, CA 92059
Ph: (760) 891-3500
Fax: (760) 742-1411
"
September 4, 2008
Wendy Worthey
City of Lake Elsinore
Community Development Dept.
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Re: Consultation, Notice of Availability and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative
Declaration for the Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan Amendment No.2
Dear Ms. Worthey:
The Pala Band of Mission Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Office has received your
notification of the project referenced above. This letter constitutes our response on behalf
of Robert Smith, Tribal Chairman.
u
We have consulted our maps and determined that the project as described is not within
the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. The project is also beyond the
boundaries of the territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Use Area (TUA).
Therefore, we have no objection to the continuation of project activities as currently
planned and we defer to the wishes of Tribes in closer proximity to the project area.
However, if the project boundaries are modified to extend beyond the currently proposed
limits, we do request updated information and the opportunity to respond to your
changes.
We appreciate involvement with your initiative and look forward to working with you on
future efforts. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me by telephone at 760-891-3591 or bye-mail at sgaughenla2oalatribe.com.
~~\
Shasta C. Gaughen, MA
Tribal Historic Preselvation Officer
Pala Band of Mission Indians
u
ACEND,I.I.ITE,Ll [~O. 5'
PAGE~CF e "1
n
(\
n
3.0 Responses to Written Comments
Letter 2 - Soboba Band of Luiseiio Indians
This letter states that the project site is outside of the Tribe's existing reservation and
does not fall within the bounds of its Tribal Traditional Use Area. The letter also states
that the Tribe does not see a need for Native American monitoring due to its
understanding that no ground disturbance is being done at this time. The IS/NO does
indicate that ground disturbance will be forthcoming as part of prior project approvals.
In other words, the IS/NO explains that grading and other ground-disturbing activities
would occur as part of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan development and that
they have already been approved through prior CEQA processes. The mitigation
associated with the priorC~QA processes shall be implemented as appropriate. Further,
the IS/NO explains that the SP A2 is being processed ONLY to allow for a modification of
the approved park site from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. The SP A2 is not the mechanism that
provided approvals for grading or other ground disturbance. As such, no monitoring
would be required to process a reduction in park size: .
Murdock Alberhill SPA No.2
FinallS/ND
3-4
ACENDA iTG!. NO.
PAGE Ii I
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008
S"
OF 8'1
September 10, 2008
Re: Murdock
Sincerely,
~
~ Erica Helms-Schenk
Soboba Cultural Resource De
P.O. Box 487
San Jacinto, Ca 92581
Phone (951) 654-5544 ext.4129
Cell (951) 663-8333
ehelms@soboba-nsn.gov
"'AIT-" "0
ACEN!J "1":"
PAGE '1.)...
u
()
u
5
OF C(\y
(\
(\
(\
3.0 Responsesto Written Comments
Letter 3 - Morongo Band of Mission Indians
This letter offers three comments which are briefly described and responded to below:
. If human remains be encountered during grading and other construction
excavation; work in the immediate vicinity should cease and the County Coroner
contacted. The IS/NO explains that grading and other ground-disturbing
activities that would occur as part of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SpeCific Plan
development have already been approved through prior CEQA processes. The
mitigation approved during the prior CEQA processes shall be implemented as
appropriate. Further, the IS/NO explains that this SPA2 is being processed
ONLY to allow for a modification of the approved park site from 10.8 acres to 4.8
acres. The SPA2 is not the mechanism that provides approvals for grading or
other ground disturbance. As such, no additional monitoring would be required
to process a reduction in park size. '
. The comment addresses accidental findings of Native American cultural
resources on the project site during project construction. As discussed above, the
IS/NO explains that grading and other ground-disturbing activities that would
,occur as part of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan development have
already been approved through prior CEQA processes. The mitigation approved
during the prior CEQA processes shall be implemented as appropriate. Further,
the IS/NO explains that this SP A2 is being processed ONLY to allow for a
modification of the approved park site from io.8 acres to 4.8 acres. The SP A2 is
not the mechanism that provides approvals for grading or other ground
disturbance. As such, no additional mitigation to reduce the acreage of a park
site is required.
., The City appreciates the acknowledgement and understanding by the Morongo
Band that other Tribes may have claimed cultural affiliation to the site as well. As
discussed above, no additional mitigation is required to reduce the acreage of a
park site. '
Murdock Alberhill SPANo. 2
FinallSjND
3-6
City of Lake Elsinore
AGEOIDAI--,;;e.p,tember2oo8 S-
1'01 i l:.::~'~j ,~v.
PAGE l-f 3 OF 6 \..(
~~(~a\W~lDJ
s .. .. ..
'" .' f) Lc,j8
September II, 2008 CITY 0: ~P.Kt tc.SINORE .
PLAr.hlJlf11G DIvISION
Wendy Worthey, Principal Environmental Planner '.Co."
City of lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
MORONGO
BAND OF
MISSION
I.NDIANS
II
u
. A SOVEREIGN NATION
SUBJECT: Notice of Availability and .
Notice ofIiltent to Adopt a Negative Declaration
for ,the Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan
Amendment No.2'
Dear Ms. Worthey:.
Thank you for contacting the Morongo Band of Mission Indians regarding the above
referenced project(s). The Tribe greatly appreciates the opportunity to review the project
and, respectfully, offer.the following coinment(s): .
o If human remains are encountered during grading and other construction
excavation, work in the immediate vicinity shall cease and the County
Coroner shall be contacted. pursuant to State Health and Safety Code
S7050.5. . .
u
o In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered
during project development/construction, all work' in the immediate
vicinity of the find shall cease and a qUalified arChaeologist meeting
Secretary ofInterior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on
the overall project may continue during this assessment period.
o If significant Native American cultural resources are discovered, for
which a Treatment Plan must be prepared, the developer or his
archaeologist shall contact the Morongo Band of Mission Indians
("Tribe")I. If requested by the Tribe, the developer or the project
archaeologist shall, in good faith, consult on the discovery and its
disposition (e.g. avoidance, preservation, return of artifacts to tribe, etc.).
t The Morongo Band of Mission Indians realizes that there may be additional tribes claiming
cultural affiliation to the area; however, Morongo can only speak for itself. The Tribe has no
objection if the archaeologist wishes to consult with other tribes and if the city wishes to revise the
condition to recognize other tribes.
u
49750 SEMINal{ DRIVE . CABAlON. CA 9mo . 951-849.8B07 .
ACEi'JD.\\ m,r:l NO.
lAX 951-911.8146 PACE Y I..f
OF
:;-
B\.f
(\
n
(\
In may be of further assistance with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 951-755-5212 or FRANKLIN DANCY@MORONGO.ORG.
Very truly yours,
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
~'O~LO
Franklin A. Dancy ~ ' - J
Project Manager
,ec"'.'O S
J:.GE-E)}; ~ I ~,';j~;,j:- . fJ '-f
PACE '-1.5 OF
INITIAL STUDY /
NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 2008-12
State Clearinghouse No. 88090517
u
MURDOCKALBERHILL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2
Lake Elsinore, California
u
Prepared By:
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Applicant:
Castle and Cooke - Alberhill Ranch, Inc.
17600 Collier Avenue, Suite C120
Lake Elsinore, CA 92651
September 2008 U
MmJ<<k AIkrbiU Ranth Spetiji. Pia" Amutdment No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
C;w oftJ;ke E!s;no,e 5
ACENDA lTl.:1/I ;'1 \....\, i!ll66
PAGE l.( r,.. Or ~) 'l
(\
n
(\
/
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTROD UCfI ON..... ............................. ....... ........ ....... ........ ....... ........... ........ ........3
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 7
III. ENVIRONMENid CHECKLIST ~...................'...............:....................................11
A. Background... .......:..........: ..'. ~..,.:.....:::.....'.. ..... ,....... ....:... :.......... ..... ........ ............ ...... ...1 i
B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .~......................::..............:.....:..........12 .
C. Determination .......................:............,.....,:....'...........:.......................:......:............. 12
IV. ENVIRO~~~AL ANALYSIS .............:................:..............................:........~:. 19
1. . Aesthetics... .......... .......... ,. :... ....:...... .... ,....... ..... ;......., .:...... ....... ... ....... ............... ....... 19
II. Agriculture Resources... ....:.... ...:.. .:........ .:....: .:... ... ......;'.. ..~... ..... ... ......... .......:......... 20
III. A!-r Qu.ality........ ......... ........,.. ...........:....: ".:' ..:.., ........ .....,.:... '" ........... ......... ............. 20
IV. BIOlOgical Resources .................................,:........................................................... 21
V. Cultural Resources..............:.................................................................................. 22
VI. Geology and Soils......;;................;....:...:........:......:..:........:......................................23
VII. Hazards and Hazardous MateRIALS .:.:.............:...,...........:..............,....................24
VIII.. Hydrology and Water Quality.......'....................:................................ ...:..............:.26
IX. Land Use and .Planning;.............:..............;....:..........:........................................... 28
~. ~~fs:r~~.~~~~~:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~.
XII. Population and Housing...:................:.........:..............................................:.........:.31
XIII. Public Services.....:... .., ...... ...............:.......;.. '" ........ :......... ............. ........... .:.... ........ 31
XIV. Recreation...................................................... ........................................................32
XV. Transportation/Traffic ..................................;.......................................................33.
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems ..::.....:..:...........'...::.........................................:.................... 34
V. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE...:...:....................;.......................36
,. ' -'".,' . -. . 1 .,' ' , , . ; .
VI. NEGATIVE DEClARATION .....................:...........;;.................:....................... 37
, . , - ; ~. " . ,
FINDINGS......;:........:...............,..:...........;~.;.;.....:....................................................38.
liST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Regional Location ..;........:....:...:...;..........:....:...................,.........:.......................!!
Figure 2 . . Existing Land Use Plan............;...........:........:.........::.:.....::..........:......:.....:.:......9.
Figure 3 Proposed SPA2 Land Use Plan ......................................................................10
,',
.' ,.-..
Mllf'dock, AlbtrhiU F..mu-h SptdJk Pion Amelldmrnl No. 2 .
Ini[i21 Study/Draft Neg.ative Dedaration
ii
City of Lakr Elsinore
ACEI,O~"",'bM~8
PAGE ~ I
'5"'
'B\.(
OF
I. INTRODUCfION
A. PURPOSE
()
This document is an Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration (IS/NO) for evaluation
of environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed Murdock Alberhill
Specific Plan Amendment NO.2:, For purposes of this document, this Specific Plan
Amendment NO.2 as described in Section II, Project. Description, will be called "SPA2" or
the "proposed project", and Castle and Cooke will be referred to as the "Applicant."
The intent of this IS/NO is not to evaluate any part of the approved Murdock Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan but rather to address the potential environmental effects of reducing
park acreage within one Plann!ng Area of the Specific Plan. '
B. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITIAGr REQUIREMENTS
As defined bySection 15063 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, an Initial Study is" prepared primarily to provide the Lead,Agency with
information to use as the'basisfor deciding whether the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative DeclaratioJ:!. would, be' appropriate for providing the
necessary environmental documentation for a. proposed discretionary action. The City of
Lake Elsinore (City) is designated the Lead Agency, in accordance with Section 15050 of the
CEQA Guidelines. The Lead Agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility
for carrying out or approving a proje~t that may have, significant effects upon the
environment.
Through this Initial Study, the City has'determined tnat the project will not have a U
significant effect on the environment, and that even without mitigation, all impacts resulting
from the proposed project will be less than significant. This determination was made based
upon technical. analysis, factual data, and other supporting documentation. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration (NO) is being proposed. The IS/NO will be ,circulated for a period of
30 days' for public and' agency review. Comments received on the document will be
considered by the City before it acts on the proposed project.
This Initial Study has been prepared in conformance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et. seq.); Section'
15070 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the' California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000;
et. seq.); and applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore
C. INTENDED USES OF INITIAL STUDY/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION
This Initial Study, along with the attached Negative Declaration (IS/NO) is an informational
document intended to inform City decision-makers, other responsible or interested agencies,
and the general public of potential environmental effects of the project. The environmental
review process has been established to enable public agencies to evaluate environmental
consequences and to examine and implement methods of eliminating or reducing any
potentially adverse impacts.
U
MNrdock AlberhiU Ram"h Sptciji( Phil Amrndmml No. 2
. Initial Study/Drnft Negative Declaration
3
Ci!! of Lake Elsinore
ACENDA II E;~'I.O>b." 2008
PAGE \1 ~ OF
~
8'l
D. CONTENTS OF INITIAL SlUDY , '
[\
This IS/NO is' organized to facilitate a basic understanding of the existing setting and
environmental implications of the proposed project as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION identifies . City of Lake Elsinore contact persons involved in the
process, scope of environmental review, environmental procedures, and incorporation by
reference documents.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION describes the proposed project. A description ofproposed
discretionary approvals and permits required for project im~lementation is also included.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM presents the results of the environmental
evaluation for the proposed project and those issue areas that would have either a significant
impact, potentially significant impact; o~ no impact. .' ,
IV. ,ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS evaluates each response provided in the
environmental checklist form. Each response checked is discussed and supported with
sufficient data and analysis. As appropriate, each response discussion describes and
identifies 'specific impacts anticipated with project implementation.' In this section,
mitigation measures would be recommended, if appropriate, to reduce adverse impacts to
levels of "less than significant" where possible.
V. MANDATORY FINDINGS presents Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance
with Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines.
(1
VI. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS' CONSULTED identifies those persons
consulted and involved in preparation of this Initial Study.' '. , ; , ' .
, . ,
' ,
c
VII. REFERENCES lists bibliographical materials used in preparation of this document.
VIII. NEGATIVE DECLARATION
E. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
For evaluation of environmental impacts, each qu~tion from the Environmental Checklist ,
Form is stated and responses are provided according'to the analysis undertaken as part of
the Initial Study. All responses takeintd account the whole action involved, including off-site
as well as on-site impacts, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and'
construction as well as operational. Project impacts and effects will be evaluated and
quantified, when appropriate. To each question,there arefour possible responses, including:
1. No Impact: A ':No Impact" response is adequately supported, if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the proposed project.
2. Less Than Significant Impact: Development associated with project
implementation will have the: potential to impact the environment. These impacts,
however, will be less than the levels of thresholds that are considered 'significant and no
additional analysis is required,
n
3. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: This applies where
, incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant
. .
MlifYiock AlhtrhiU Rmtd) Speiific Plan Amendment NIJ. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
4
City Y.\.H1;e.m~ino<<, 5
ACENDA i i;l;j\iIn\liM"""'
PACE li If OF ~ L(
Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The' Lead 'Agency must describe the
mitigation measures and explain how the measures reduce the effect to a less than U
significant level. .. , .,
4. Potentially Significant Impact: Future implementation will have impacts that are
considered significant and additional analysis and possibly an' EIR are required to .
identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant
~~ .' ..
F. PRIOR CEQA BACKGROUND
The Applicant has requested an amendrrient to the Murdock AlberhiIl Ranch Specific Plan.
The original AlberhiIl Ranch Specific Plan proposed by Long Beach Equities covered 3,705
dwelling unitS on 1,853 acres, and was adopted May 28, 1989. Since that time multiple
amendments and CEQA actions have been processed through the City, including those that
removed portions of the original Specific Plan' and' subsequently created the separate
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (Addendum. to the Alberhill Ranch Final
Environmental Impact Report, certified June 1992). City staff has determined that although
impacts associated witha decrease in park acreage are minor, there is no provision within
the Specific Plan which allows for approval of SP A2 without additional CEQkreview, nor is
there an applicable CEQA exemption for this project ,as proposed. As such, the 'City
determiried that prior approvals under CEQA do not cover the proposed SP A2..
G. EXISTING DOCUMENTS 1;'0 BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
CEQA Guidelines Section 15150 permits an environmental document to incorporate all or
portions of other. documents which are public records or are generally available to the public.
Where all or part of another document is incorporated by reference, the incorporated
language is considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the environmental
document; provided that it is bri~f1y summarized where possible. in the environmental
document, or briefly described if the data or information cannot be summarized. The
environmental document must also describe the relationship' between itself and the
incorporated part of the referenced documents.
This ISjND incorporates by reference the docu~ents that are sum~arized below. As will be
seen in sections that foIlow, the City previously relied upon these documents in developing.
SPA2. For this reason, these documentS are referenced herein. '
,
Copies of all incorporated documents are available to the public for inspection during
regular business hours at the Planning Division of the City, which is located at: .
.. 130 South Main Street, . ,
, Lake Elsinore, California 92530
u
",
The following identifies and briefly summarizes the main incorporated documents: .
, ; . .
City of Lake Elsinore General Plan
"
City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Lake Elsinore, California. Adopted'November 27,1990.
Revised March 1995.. .' .
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 89-2
On March 28, 1989, the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the A1berhill U
Ranch Specific Plan 89-2, State Clearinghouse No. 88090Si7. The A1berhill Ranch Specific Plan
MlIfriock AllxrhiU Ranch Specijit: Plan AmendmertJ No. Z
[niti::!.1 Srudy/DClft Negative Oecbr.uion
5
City of Lake Elsinore C
,..-,,~ ^ '--'1 ,J..'ntemb" 2008 :7
kv b't:.~ir. i Il!:L loiV.
PN:;E. 5c. 0;: <a Y
n
(\
(\
encompassed 1,853 acres generally bonnd by 1-15 on the north, Terra Colla Road/Nichols Road on the
sonth, El Toro Road on the east, and Lake Street on the west.
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Addendum to the Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan 89-2 Final Environmental Impact Report
Approved in June 1992, this Addendum was prepared to focus on, the 'changes to the previously
approved Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. It was not the intent of this Addendum to identify and
evaluate environmental impacts associated with the development of the portion of the Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan that was being addressed in the new and separate Murdock Alberhill'Ranch Specific
Plan. City staff had determined Ihat a new Environmental Impact Report was not required for the
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan because the' changes proposed did not have significant'
environmental effects different than those analyzed in the original Alberhill Rach Specific Plan FEIR.
H. PERMITS AND ENTITLEMENTS FORPROJEcr APPROVAL '
City of Lake Elsinore'
Specific Plan Amendment NO.2
:r
". .1
"
M~kAlherhiU Ranch Spccflic Pia" AmmtlmenJ No. Z
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
6
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008
"."""'" 'r-" 'JO ]
KV'-=H,Vrl. i A.::~"d~' .
PAGE S-I O~_ I..{
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. PROJEcr LOCATION AND SETTING
u
The proposed project site is located in the northeastern part. of the City of Lake Elsinore
(City), within the boundaries of Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (Figure 1) which
encompasses approximately 511-4 acres of land. Regional access to the site is currently
provided by Interstate 15 (1-15). The primary access to the site would be off of Nichols Road,
between Lake Street and Collier Avenue.
The Specific Plan includes three (3) Planning Areas each with various residential uses,.
commerciaf and neighborhood commercial uses, dedication of a school site, open space,
public and private parks, and a variety of other infrastructure improvements (Figure 2). The
maximum number of dwelling units (DU) is 1,485 at an average density of 2.9 DU/acre.
Development to date has occurred primarily within Planning Area I, including the
construction of major backbone infrastructure, a 22-acre community park, a Boys & Girls
Club, and construction of over 200 new single family homes. The remaining portions of the
Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan area may be graded in their entirety through prior
project approval and entitlements. Surrounding land uses include undeveloped areas to the
east, established conservation lands to the west and north, and existing and planned
residential uses to the south.
This SPA2 only applies to Planning Area 2 which specifically includes 283 DU (single-family
residential), witIl 19.9 acres of open space, a 1.6-acre private park and a 10.8-acre public
park.
B. PROJEcr DESCRIPTION
u
SP A2 proposes to modify the configuration of the public park site located at the eastern edge
of Planning Area 2. With the City's approval of tIlis request, the park site will be decreased
from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. Modification of tIle park site as proposed (Figure 3) results in a
6.0 acre increase in land that will be used for residences, and will enable larger lots sizes as
well as a more efficient and desirable subdivision design for Planning Area 2. However,
SPA2 does not alter the number of DUs, nor tIle overall density witIlin Planning Area 2 or
the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan.
This reduction in park area does not affect the. City's Quimby Act parkland dedication
requirements based upon the criteria of 5 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. Both
the existing Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and the SPA2 exceed the amount of park
dedication required. Furthermore, City staff coordinated with Mr. Ray Gonzales, Director of
Community Services, City of Lake Elsinore, to confirm his support of SPA2.
u
Mmrltkk AlbtrhiU Ranch'Speiific PIo" AmtltdmeRl No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
7
Ci()' of Lake Elsinore
a:tember 200~
. ..."""",,,..,, 7~-~-" "~
f'~;,-,b'(LH\ili\.:i"l i-.a .
PACE 9 01' ~ \.!
I
0<1:
z~
C;}.o
~ o LL
.- ....!:J ~
I -....!<I:
al:co ~
! Oa: ~
Owuj ~
~~ .
-.J m a: ~
~~ ....!o e
J, -<l:z
~ al:>.!(jj I<
~
~ co....! ~
W Oow
~ ~ a:.- Ow
:::> rna:l><:
~ o CI>:>::s
.:\ LLa::::;
~
~~ b
0 0
z ...
...
u
"'.
Idui' a
~t; '"
~~ ~
..~
~~
.~~
~
~
.' g
....
w W,.;
a OleO
iii_ OZ
~~ 00(
~~ ()G:a
........
~~ w!i!l!l.
Qu
z o:!"'...... l
Io~ CD ILI.~!!
~""':' o(~ 0
u (,)c :I:
g
w~
~ -
8G:!
U"N
~~~
W3;;!<i
Z~
i5
~
~
'"
~
N
~
<t) 9
!):: ::
~ ::!~
~ ~7
~ ~~
~ ~ g~
lfj ~5
~~i!
o~
z~
W
oJ
~~!
~
>
'"
u
'"
~
~
u
'"
l"
u
~
a
o
~
~
~
.
WI
~u
8~
.."
~:3
E~
s
u
u
~
~
.
"
~
CENDA li~;,l NO.
PAGE
~
VJ
U
s::
~
"
<J
0"
.
b
o
'"
'"
r
.!
!
.
.!
$
~
;i
~
~
~
~
~
li
~
~
"
"
~
~
~
~
b
<X)
o
I
l"-
N
I
<X)
~
w
!;;:
o
I
ll...U
o..~ :a:i~ CI<(
"'~N
. ~.o alOZ
_Za:
o..~O
11)..../1!: ~
0)..../""/ , '
::> - <( ~
IO ~
a: ..
"UW- ~
cmW
al..../~ .
a
C\I.....I<(Z
:.l0)
W 0)0..../
a: .!;; 0 W
::> 11) 0 W
o 0- a: :.l
- Uj ::> <( t
LL ::E ..../
~
s
l
0 ~
'" 0 ~
.; 0
'"
~I R
~~ ~
~., ~
~- ~
ct 0 ~
0
c.; 0 ~
~
~
en i
U .,
::2 ,
b ...
)g! Iii 0' ~
Cl ~
b ". ~
.....tiil:o! J
.. D a
~ ~
o~ ~
G
.J
N
...
1l
:I ~
;;1 .01
&i
la. '!i! ~~
...~
UG ...~ (-o~
~ci
i ~l":
>~
ct
~-f:\~ ~F.'~. ~
PAGE SY OF e
D
;;
,
~ ~
HllQ~
~~
~:l:g
~ ~~
~Iij ~
au
<X) ..
l' 5~
.t"'-- l')::)
N ffi~
cb~ g!
W . t:
f- 2
<( D
Cl :;
1li
b
!~l
!l0l~
.. 0
~
(\
1
~l
.l!~
om
1ad
.f
-
~ ~I
d 11~
';~ l-d
~~
.f
.-'~r. r'
PAGE ~ "\ Or-
J
o~
m
~
--:-;:'/~ rJo.
C
al
lL
G>
(I)
=>:1:
"UO:'!
CZZ
al<l:a:
....J a: f(
(\/:J-.l
-<l:
<{~O
Q..w-
oomW
-.lIS
~ "U<l:z
., G>~-
w (1)03
a: 0 ow
::::> o.Ow
,'" 0 a:~
l::! ....::l<l:
ILlL~-.l
i<i
:;!
U
U)
U
s:
~
...
<J
!!Ij
It:
~
~
g
;;;
,
~ ~
I!h~
~ ~7
~"ll
~ ;:
~w.,
.1lJ ~~
"u
lX) ..
o ffi~
~-;
o ~
..
..
~
~ .
~
~
B
"
z
.
.
t
~
~
.
!
b
C)
C)
'"
~
~
~
R
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
"
b
C)
C)
~
b
,
~
..
~
~
~
III. ENVIRONMENTAL.CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Project Title: Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Lake Elsinore; 130 South Main Street; Lake Elsinore,
CA 92530
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Wendy Woriliey, Principal Environmental Planner, (951)
674-3124 ext. 288
4. PrOject Location: The proposed project site (SPA2) lies within the boundaries of Murdock Alberhill
Ranch which encompasses approximately 511.4 acres of land. More specifically, the site is bound by
Nichols Road to the south, and located between Lake Street and Collier Avenue.
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Castle & Cooke - Alberhill Ranch, Inc. 17600 Collier
Avenue, Suite C120, Lake Elsinore, CA 92539.
6. General Plan Designation: Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan.
7. Zoning: Specific Plan including single-family residential (R-SF), Open Space (OS) and Public Park
(P).
8. Description of Project: Please refer to Section IIProjectDescription above.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Please refer to Section II Project Description above:
10. Other public agencies whose approvalis required: None.
Murdock AlbtrhiU RalU'h SJKafic Plan Amendmtnl No. 2
Initial Study/Drnft Negative Declaration
II
".~ '_ 1,",E~typ( uke Elsinore S
kvtf"\uA II t.:,h-! i\iQ..p~""""J.v.~ "llV'lQ
PAGE <; fo . OF~
(j
u
u
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECfED
(\ The environmental factors checked below 'would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Mitigated to Below a Level of Significance," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Allimpacts identified for the project will be
mitigated to below a level of significance.'
00
(\
,
o Aesthetics
o Biological Resources
0: Hazards & HazMat '
0, Mineral Resources
D. Public Services
o (Utilities & Service Systems
o Agricultural Resources' ' 0 Air Quality
o Cultural Resources' 0 Geology & Soils
o Hydrology &Water Quality. 0 Land Use & Planning
o Noise 0 Population & Housing'
o Recreation " '0 Transportation & Traffic
o Mandatory Findings of Significance '
c. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial,evaluation:
~
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DEClARATION will be prepared.
o
I find that although the propOStCd project could have a significant effect on the
'environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions.in the
project have been made by or agreed to by, the project proponent. A MmGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, ' "
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requited. ", ' ,
, ,
o
I find that the proposed project" MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact ,.on the ,environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based onthe earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it must analyze only the effects that remainto be addressed, ' ,
I find that although the proposed' project could have a significant effect on the
environment, becaus'e all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided 'or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
o
Wendy Wo
8-28-08
Date
nvironmental Planner
MN~k AlbtrbiU Ranch Spdfi< Plan Amendl1lmJ No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
12
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA rffilrnl~f. 2008
PAGE 5"1 OF
5
~'-I
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
less ,Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
less Than
Significant
Impact
No
. Impact
u
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, induding, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings. and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which
would adversely affed.,day or nighttime views in the area?
x
x,
x
;-- J
x
a) Convert Prime Fannland, Unique Fannland, or Fannland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use? .,
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson ~ct contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing'environment which,
due to their location'or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
x
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ,
air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute_substantially
to an existing or projected air qua.1ity violatio"n?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any.
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non':'
attainmen~ under an applicabJe federal or state -ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which
exceed quantitative thresholds for oz~ne precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
x
e)
.X
a) Have a substantial adverse effec( either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as
a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
x
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
x
u
Mltrdtx-k AlbtrhiU RandJ SptdJi, Plan Ammdmtnl Na 2
Initial Study/Drnft Neg:l.tive Declarnbon
13
City of Lake Elsinore
SeRtembec 2008 5
AGENDA nt:~t1 NO.
PAGE.2B--O;: lb '1
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(\
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (induding, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with,
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local poltcies or. ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
x
x
x
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat
conservation plan?
x
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifiCance of X
a historical resource as defined in ~15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.57
cJ Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
(\ d) Disturb any human remains, induding those interre~ X
outside o~ formal cemeteries?
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, induding the risk of loss, injury, or death
invotving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map,
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
jy) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion' or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project. and
pOtentially result in on- or off.site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8
of the Uniform Buikfing Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(\
Mlirtkxk AlberbiU Ram-h Sptlific Plan Amendment No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Neg:ltive Declamion
14
City of Lake: Elsinore
ACi:NDP. iT~1iri>WQ)p 2008
PAGE 5~ OF
'5
<&'1
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporated
.. . .'Pw."w.'ill'i_~"".,;,$1;'1i-~"
't.~J~Ji:ft",~i5r;~ ;;;k.I$.i'l:~:<~"".,:,.;?t;.;y~",;.? 1'c;M:\<~:ft~.J'" -;t.' .}~,'{ "'~.
Issues
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use or disposal
of hazardous materials?
b)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonable' foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ooe-
quinter mile of an existing or proposed schocl? .
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
c)
d)
e)
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
or a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety' hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
For a projec!: within the vicinity o~ a private airstrip, would
the projed result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
ev~cuatio.n plan?
f)
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
. ~~~g1{j;tt{V:rW~J1If!l~
x
>
x -
. X
'X
X
X
X
X
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of. pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses Of planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, induding through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Su~stantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the cours,e of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
X
X
X
X
MtmltXk AIhe,hill Ranch Spetiji,. Pia" An<<ndmml No." 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
15
City of Lake Elsinore
ACl::rmA iTEIM'W?<' 2008
PAGE (,0
u
u
u
OF
:s-
rt;\.f
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
less Than
Significant
I......pact
No
Impact
(\
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 10o-yeat flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood hazard Boundary of Rood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding. induding flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Imiodation by seiche, -tsunami, or mudflow?
x
x
x
x
x
x
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
(\ c) ConOiet with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
a) Resurt in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that woukj be a value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
a) . Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial pennanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project viCinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise tevels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, woutd the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
(\ excessive noise &evels?
MNnWkAlbtrhiURanchSpeajicPhnAmtndmtnJ No. 2 16
lnitral Study/DnJt Negative DedaGltion
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
. City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA I~""'"
PAGEJu-OF
C)
~~
Issues .
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
u
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessrve noise levels?
~X
a) Induce substantial populaUon growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by. proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads .or other infrastructure)? '
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
cl Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
x
x
x
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protectio.n?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) other public facilities?
a) Would the project increase the use of existing .
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facitities, such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facirrty would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project indude recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
x
X
X
X
X
U
X
X
a)
c)
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of v~hide trips, the volume to capacity ratio
on roads, or congestion at intersections)? .
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
Result in.a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in sUbsta,ntial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., fann equipment)?
Result in ,inadequate emergency,access?
X
b)
x
X
d)
X
e)
X
X
u
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Mllrdnt:!e. AIbtrhiU Ranch Spedfir Phn AmendmtnJ No. 1
Initial Sntdy/Doft Negative Declaration.
17
AGENDA m,;a NO.
PACE Co ~ OF
City of Lilke Elsinore
September 2008
5<b ~
(\
Potentially
. Significant
Impact
Issues
g) Conflict with adopted poltcies, plans. or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts.
bicyde racks)?
,_._'tIt -, i'
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment faolities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which cOuld cause significant
environmental effeds?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. the
construction of which-could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) "Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commmnents?
(\
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's so~id waste disposa_1 needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
x
x
.x
x
x
x
x
a) Does the project have the potential todegrade the quality
of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish. or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? rCumulatlVefy
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either diredfy or indirectly?
(\
x
x
x
Mlmil)(k AlbtrhiU R4&1J SpetiJk Plan Amendmtnl No. 2
InitUl Study/Dr.lft Negative Ded:lr:l.oon
18
City of La.k~ Elsinou
September 2008 5
ACEiIIDA fTEf!l r~o.
PACE (O~ OF tb~
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This section provides an evaluation 'of the impact categories and questions contained in the
Environmental Checklist. '
I. AESTHETICS
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Imoact
The 1989 FEIR and the 1992 Addendum for SPAl acknowledged that the Murdock Alberhill
Ranch would permanently alter the nature and appearance of the area by introducing
development in a largely undeveloped area. A scenic vista generally provides the following:
focal views of objects, settings, or features of visual interest; or panoramic views of large
geographic areas of scenic quality, primarily from a given vantage point. A significant impact
to a scenic vista would occur if the project introduced an incompatible use that would
obstruct, interrupt or diminish a valued focal and/or panoramic view. SPA 2 only decreases
the park acreage from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. Although the future residents would have less
park land to view, the park is not considered a scenic vista. As such, no impacts to scenic
vistas would occur as a result ofSPA2.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not lhnited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? No Iml?act
u
SPA2 would not significantly damage scenic resources, including trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings; over those evaluated in the 1989 FEIR and 1992 Addendum for SPAl
(refer to discussion for in La. above). There are rio Official or Eligible State Scenic Highways
or corridors within the project vicinity. Therefore, SPA2 would not damage scenic resources U
involving State Scenic Highways. No impacts are identified. .
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings? No Imoact
SP A2 would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and
its surrounding. Please refer to the discussion in La. and b. above.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area? No Imoact
Approval of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan (SP) was required to include lighting
standards per Policy 7 of the Community Design Element of the City's General Plan. This
included low lumen lighting, as well as shielding on lighting to ensure that lighting does not
spill over onto adjacent lots, In addition, the project was required to incorporate
architectural treatments or finishes that would not be glare-inducing. As discussed SPA2
only decreases the park acreage from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and this action would not result
in new sources of light or glare.
Aesthetics Mitigation Measures
None required.
MllrdockAlkrhiURmuhSpea.JUPIanAmtndmtnl No. 2
lnitial Study/Dr:l.f[ Negative Declaration
19
A,... c:!.tx. of Lake Elsinore
vENDA II fr~be, 1008
PAGE (q '-I OF
U
5
~11
II.
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
(\ a)
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as showiJ. on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact
The SPA:! site is not classified as Prime "Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency. Further, the SPA:! site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor would
it result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No further analysis is
warranted. SPA:! only decreases the park acreage from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. As such, no
impacts to agricultural resources are identified for the project.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricUltural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Im{lact
Refer to discussion in II.a. above.
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No
Imuact "
Refer to discussion in II.a. above.
Amculture Resources Mitigation Measures
(\ None required.
III. AIR QUALITY
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No
Imuact
The 1989 FEIR and 1992 Addendum for SPAl evaluated impacts related to air quality.
Implementation of SPA:! only decreases park acreage from 10.8 to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in additional ihtpacts over those already evaluated. "
SPA:! does not involve any additional grading, construction or operational activities OVer"
those evaluated in prior analysis. No further analysis is warranted. Similar to the originally
approved SP, SPA2 is required to adhere to South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rules; Rule No. 401 (Visible Emissions); Rule No. 403 (Fugitive Dust Control);
Rule No. 1113 (Architectural Coatings); Rule No. 431.2 (Low Sulfur Fue!); and Rule No.
1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers) during construction-related activities. In addition,
implementation of SPA:! would be required to meet or exceed California Title 24 Energy
Efficiency standards for interior lighting, water and space heating/cooling to the extent
feasible. As such, no conflicts with the applicable air quality plan would occur nor would
SPA:! result in any other impacts to air quality.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? No Imuact
Please refer to IILa. above.
(\
MlI17iockAlbtrhill &neh Spetific Pion Amend,,!,nJ No.2
Initial Study/Draft Ntgative Declaration
20
City of Lake Elsinore
. Se[?tember 2008
AGEr~DA ITI::,'I NO.
PAGE ~ S OF
S"
<0'-1
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed U
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? No Impact
Please refer to'IILa. above. The project area is designated as non-attainment for ozone, PMlO
and PM..s. However, a reduction in park acreage (with no other changes from the originally
approved SP) will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria
pollutant. No further analysis is warranted. ,
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantia. pollutant concentrations? No Impact
please refer to IILa. above.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No
ImDact
Please refer to IILa. above. As with other air quality issues discussed above, a reduction in
park acreage (with no other changes from the originally approved SP) will not result in
impacts related to odors.
Air Ouality Mitigation Measures
None required.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat U
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No
Impact
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts. All impacts to biological resources were
evaluated in the 1989 FEIR and 1992 Addendum for SPAl, and as a result, much oftheSP
area has been graded. No further analysis is warranted. A reduction in park acreage (with
no other changes from the originally approved SP) will not result in impacts to any biological
resource, including listed species, riparian or other sensitive natural community, wetlands,
movement of species, or nursery sites. .
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wudlife
Service? No Impact -
Please refer to IV.a. above.
u
MNf'tiock Allxrhil/ RllIll:h Spe..iji< Plan AmtnJmenl No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
21
City of Lake Elsinore
Sep[etnber 2008
:~OENDA. iTSfl :~O. \
Pk~E (" ~ Or - y
(\
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetl~ds as'definedby.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means? No Imnact ' , .
PleaSe refer to IV.a. above.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of,any native resident or nugratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Imvact
Please refer to IV.a. above.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, ,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Imvact
Please refer to IV.a. above. Currently, the City has a palm tree preservation ordinance and
the developer will be conditioned to comply with this ordina.nce. No palm trees will be
removed regardless of. the park site being 10.8 acres or 4.8 acres. As'such, a reduction in
park acreage (with no other changes from the originally approved SP) Will not -result in
impacts to the palm tree preservation ordinance. '
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan? No Imnact
(\
SPA2 represents a new discretionary action which triggers a consistency review under the'
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Alth~)Ugh
SPA2 represents a discretionary action, the Murdock Alberhill RarichSP,is exempt from an
MSHCP review purSuant to a legal settlement between the Applicant and the County of
Riverside. As such, MSHCP provisions are not applicable to the proposed project, and no
impact is identified for this issue area. .
Biological Resources Mitil!ation Measures '
None required.
v. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Cause a substantial ad:verse change in the significance of a historical resource
as defined in gls064.S? No Imvact '
SP A2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10:8' acres' to 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts. Cultural resources issues were evaluated
in the 1989 FEIR and 1992 Addendum for SPA1, and mitigation was incorporated to address
potential impacts. As a result, much of SP area has been graded and contoured. A reduction
in park acreage with no other changes from the originally approved SP will not result in
impacts to any cultural resource, including ,changing the significance of a 'historical or
archeological resource, paleontological resources, or human remains. No further analysis or
mitigation is required:
(\
MJmlode A1berbill Ran,"" Sp~ Ph" Amendnte11l No. 2
[nitiaJ Study/Draft N~tive Dedar.ltion
22
City of Lake Elsit:lore
September 2008
""~"''''n '"'-.' r'o ,....-
r'~vt:h;1..'M. l i i;i~-l -OJ . 2..
PAGE <e., Of~ . t> Y.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to !l1s064.s? . No Impact
Please refer to V.a. above. In addition, and because this action involves a sp~cific plan
amendment, the proposed project is subject to Senate Bill 18 compliance. On March 1,
2008, the City sent out notices to potentially interested Tribes inviting them to participate in
government to government consultation regarding concerns they may have resulting from
SPA2. No responses were received during the response period ending June 1, 2008.
u
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature? No ImDact
Please refer to V.a. above.
d) Disturb any human remains, . including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries? No Impact
As discussed above, much of SP site has been graded. However, the possibility remains that
human remains may be encountered during other construction activities such as fine-
grading orimy other activity not currently anticipated at this time. If human remains are
encountered during project grading, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states
that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the .
necessary findings as to the origin of the remains uncovered. Further, pursuant to California
Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in- place and free from
disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the
Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native
American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within a reasonable timeframe. U
Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely
descendant.>> The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations; and engage in
consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code
5097.98. Adherence to these regulatory requirements would ensure that there are no
impacts resulting from implementation of SPA2.
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures
None required.
'.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOIlS
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse - effects, including
the risk ofloss, injury, or death involving: -.' . -
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most. recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist
for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No ImDact
The reduction in park land proposed in SPA2 would not result in exposing people or
structures to any potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death. These effects include those associated with seismic activity, ground failure;
liquefaction, or landslides. All impacts related to geology were analyzed as part of prior
approval processes, and a reduction in park land does not require further analysis.
u
Mwr10ck AlkrhiU &mch Spuifu Plan Amendment N", 2
Initial Study IDraft Negative Dedamtion
23
City of Lake Elsinore -.
AGEr~DPl ~T;:F;-l r~~tembe( 2008 S-
PACE CoB OF ~ "1
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? No Imoact
n
Please refer to VI.a.i. above.
iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? No I~1>act
Please refer to VI.a.i. above.
iv) Landslides? No Imoact
Please refer to VI.a.i. above. '
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftopsoil? No Imoact
SPA:! involves only. a decrease,in park land froni;l'o.8 acres to 4.8 acres and 'does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts. All impacts related to 'erosion, loss of
topsoil, unstable soil, limdslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,collapse, or
expansive soils were addressed as part of prior approval processes, and as a result, much of
the SP site has been graded. A reduction in park acreage (with no other changes from the
originally.approved SP) will not res1,llt in geologic impacts. No further analysis is required.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in one or off-site
landslide; hiteral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? No Impact'
Please refer to VI.b. above.
(\ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-Bofthe Uniform Building
Code (19~4),creating substantialrisks to life or property? No Im{lact
Please refer to VI.b. above.
e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems,where sewers are not-available for the
disposal of wastewater? No Imoact
The proposed project would not be serviced by either septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems. SPA:! only involves a reduction in park land with no other changes to the
original SP. No impact is identified for this issue area.
Geolol!V and Soils Mitil!:ation Measures
None required,
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment, through the
routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? No Im{lact
n
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to hazards or hazardous
materials. The proposed project would comply with existing federal and state standards in
Mllrdock AlberhiU RmIrh spuiJk Plan AmeltdmtnJ No. 2
Initial Study/J?r...ft Negative Oedaration
24
i'~~d,::;<"~~ (iSir~1~':~~:i;;: 5
PAGE (q "1 0;: <0 \.j
place for the handling, storage, transport, and use of hazardous materials. A reduction in
park acreage (with no other changes from the originally approved SP) will not result in
additional impacts, and no further analysis is required. -
u
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of,
hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to the reasonably foreseeable
upset or accident conditions. The Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP) would be
implemented and would include spill response, notification, and cleanup of hazardous
materials accidentally released during construction and/or operation of project facilities.
Adherence to federal, state, and City reStrictions coupled with implementation of the SPCP
would ensure that no impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials will occur. A
reduction in park acreage with no other changes from the originally approved SP will not
result in ~dgitional impacts; and no further analysis is required. '
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or' acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or' waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school? No Impact
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. There are no'
existing or proposed schools within one-quarter mile 'of SPA:!. As such, no impacts are
identified for this issue area.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Governnient code Section 65962.5 and, as a r~sult, would
it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Imvact'
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acreS and does'not
constitute an action which would result in impacts. The SPA:! site has never been developed
and is surrounded by areas that have largely been undeveloped. No impact is identified for
this issue area and no further analysis is required. ' ,
u
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within tWo miles of it public airport or public use airport, ,
would the project result in a safety hao/d for people residiJ;1g or working in the
project area? No ImDact '
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. There are no
airports within two miles of SP A2. As such, no impacts are identified for this issue area.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a, private airstrip, woul~the project result in
a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact
Please'refer to VILe. above.
u
MlII'dock A/hemiU Ranch Spuift: Pia" AmtndmenJ No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
25
Ciry .of Lake Elsinore
September 2008'
AGENDA ITr:M NO.
PAGE 10 OF
5
16\.j
(\
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere'with an adopted emergency ,
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No ImDact
SP A2 involves only a, decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres,' and does not
constitute an action which would result in environmental impacts. SPA2 will not interfere
with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. As such, no impacts are identified
for this issue area.
h) Expose people or structures to' a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed With wildlands? No ImDac~ '
SPA2 involves only a reduction in,park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction alone
does not constitute an action which would result in im exposure to wildfire risk as a park was
already approved as part of the original SP. It should be noted that according to the West
Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map prepared by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection (2007) the project site is within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone, which is an area characterized as having the fuels, terrain and weather conducive to
wildfire. As such, a reduction in vegetation associated with the park may actually reduce fire
potential. No impacts are identified for this issue area.,
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures
None required.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
(\ a) Violate any water qualit);, stahdards or waste discharge requirements?, No
ImDact
SP A2, involves only. a decrease in park land from, 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts to water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements. ' Impacts related to water quality were not specifically addressed in
prior CEQA documents. However, prior to the issuance of the grading permit for the SP, the
City approved a Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) which included site-specific
information on hydrology and water quality as well as required post-construction BMPs. As
a result, much of the SP site has been graded. The applicant will be required to submit a
revised grading plan andWQMP to include the reduced park area. Further, compliance
with NPDES regulations, including the implementation oLa SWPPP, BMPs, BAT,and BCT
to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution are ,required since the remaining area of
disturbance to be graded exceeds one acre. In additiqn, the proposed project would comply
with the City of Lake Elsinore development guidelines. No impacts to this issue area
anticipated, and no further analysis is required. .
(\
MNnitxkAlberhilJRmuhSptdji.PIanAmwJmrnlNo. 2
Initial Study/D~ft Negative Declaration
26
ACEf~tjWi'Vi!e!'!.'&.;no'e
Septembe. W88
PAGE, I , OF
5'
Y'1~
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume U
or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less
Than Si~ificant ImDact I
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts to water quality. Impacts related to
groundwater depletion and recharge were not specifically addressed .in prior CEQA
documents. However, no feature of SPA2 would result in substantially depleting
groundwater supplies or interfering with groundwater recharge. It should be noted that
with the reduction in park land, there may be an increase in the amount of impervious
surfaces attributable to having less open space. This would not be considered a substantial
increase as it relates to the overall approved SP. Additionally, the park site would not use
groundwater supplies as it is located within the service area of the EVMWD and would be
eligible fOr water service, Therefore, aless than significant impact is.identified for this issue'
area.
c) Substantially alter, the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts to water quality. Impacts related to
erosion/siltation were addressed as part of the 1989 FEIR and 1992 Addendum for SPAl.
Part of the approval of SPAl included a commitment to conform to all requirements of the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as well as ensure that U
erosion control devices were implemented. In addition, SPAl included a commitment to
prepare a comprehensive erosion/sedimentation control plan, including revegetation, and to
obtain regulatory permits should the project modify Temescal Creek in. any way. As a result,
much of the SP site has been graded. The. applicant has and continues to be required to
implement all applicable BMPs, BCT and BAT relating to erosion control. No impact is
identified for this issue area, .
d) Substantially alt~r the existing drainagc pattcrn of thc sitc or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially
increase the rate or.amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result
in flooding on- or off-site? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from' 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an 'action which would result in impacts to existing drainage patterns. Please
refer to VIII.c. above. There has not been nor will there be flooding on- or off-site. No
impact is identified for this issue area. ' ,;' '., '. '. .
d). Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts to stormwater drainage systems. SPAl
incorporated stormwater drainage systems in compliance with City requirements. Further,
and throughout construction and operation, the applicant continues to be required to
u
MlIrli<<k Albt:rhiU Ra"d) Sped/I< Plan Amendment No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
27
'. City of Lake Elsinore
t~GEHDA n:.u ~_~O:tember 2008 5
PAGE -"} d- OF ~)\...f
n
implement a SWPPP and WQMP including all applicable BMPs, BCf and BAT. No impact is
identified for this issue area. '
e) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? No Imoact
Please refer 'to VIII.a. above.
f) Place housing within a loo-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal
Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard
delineation map? No Imoact '
SP A2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to' 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an action which would result in placing housing in a flood hazard area. The area
that encompasses SPA2 is not located within a lOa-year flood hazard area. No impact is
identified for this issue area.
h) Place within a loo-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or
redirect flood flows? No Impact
Please refer to VIII.g. above,
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death,
involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or
dam? No Imnact
(\
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and ,does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to levee failure or flooding.
SP A2 site is not located within the' area susceptible to flooding should the Lake Elsinore
levee fail. No impact is identified for this issue area.
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact
SPA2 site is not located within the area susceptible to seiches, tsunami, or mtidflow. SPA2
involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and does not constitute an
action which would result in impacts related to these potential disasters. As such, no impact
is identified for this issue area.
Hvdrolol!V and Water Ouality Mitil!:ation Measures
None required.
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING
a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres and does not
constitute an action which would result in dividing an established community. The area set
aside for the park was part of the SPAl approval. No impact is identified for this issue area.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the.
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than'
Sil!:Dificant Imoact
(':
Mmr10ckAllxrhiU Rm:ch SptlifU Plan Amendmen/ No. 2
Initi21 Study/Da.ft Negative Decb.rati~n
28
Ac.euBA tTI::1,~ NO.
tty of Lake ElslQon~:
PAGB;ep~20<0F
c;
~Y-
The reduction of the park area to 4.8 acres proposed in SPA2 is a 6.0-acre reduction to the
10.8 acres approved in SPA1. Because the SPA1 did not include a provision allowing for this (\
change, this reduction in park areas would be in conflict with the Murdock Alberhill Ranch '-V
SP. The reduction in park land has been negotiated with the City and continues to be
compatible with other land uses within Planning Area 2. Further, this SPA2 is consistent
with the City's General Plan. With approval of the proposed SP A2; there would no longer be
a conflict with the approved SP. A less than significant impact is identified for this issue.
area.
Two regional plans that are also applicable to the project include the Riverside County
Integrated Project (RCIP) in relation to TUMF and the MSHCP. The City has agreed to
participate in the Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. No additional traffic
will result from a reduction' .on park land and therefore, additional TUMF would not be
required. As it relates to the MSHCP, please refer to IV.f. above.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural comlminity
conservation plan? No Imnact
. ,
Please refer to IV.f. above.
Land Use and Planuin!!: Mitigation Measures
None required.
X. MINERAL RESOURCES
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a
value to the region and the residents of the state? No Imnact
u
SPA2 involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to mineral resources. All impacts
related to mineral resources were addressed as part of prior approvals processes for the 1989
FEIR and the 1992 Addendum for SP AI. No impact is identified for this issue area.
b) ResUlt in the loss of availability, of . a locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use
plan? No Impact
Please refer to X.a. above.
Mineral Resources Miti!!:ation Measures
None required.
XI. NOISE
, ,
a) Exposure of persons to or generation' of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies? No Impact
Construction
Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete
u
MIIrliot:Ie AllxrbiO &inch Specific Plan Anum:lmelll No. 2
[nitial study /Draf[ Negative DeclaCltion
29
City of Lake Elsinore
ACE~lD,f.!" ITEr,j N~"=be, 2008 S
PAGe 1'1 OF. cr3Y
f\
mixers and portable generators can reach high levels. Grading activities typically represent
one of the highest potential sources for noise impacts. Impacts related to construction noise
were addressed in prior CEQA documents for this area, and as discussed previously much of
the SP area has been graded. Some of the area- within PA2, including the park being
evaluated in this SPA2 does remain to be graded. However, this area is away from existing
residences. The City's Noise Ordinance permits operation of any tools or equipment used in
construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work between the weekday hours of
7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Construction noise is of short-term. duration and would not present any
long-term impacts on the project site or the surrounding area. The reduction in park area
from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres does not constitute an action which would result in impacts
related to noise.
Operations
Once constructed, no feature of the park's operations would result in impacts related to
noise; Further,this evaluation of a reduction in park size does not constitute an action
which would result in noise impacts; As such, no impacts related to noise are identified for
SPA:!.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels? No ImDact
Please refer to XI.a. above. Similar to noise impacts discussed above, there would be no
impacts related to ground bourne vibration or noise levels.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project? No ImDact
("\ Please refer to XI.a. above.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project? No ImDact
Please refer to XI.a. above.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? No ImDact
The proposed project is not located within an airport lind use plan or within two miles of a
public-airport or public use airport. The closest related facility to the project site is the
privately owned SkYlark Airport, located across the lake in the southe~st part of the City. As
such, there is no impact identified for this issue.
f) For a pr~ject within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No
ImDact
Please refer to XLe. above.
Noise Mitigation Measures
f\ None required.
MHrtIock AlbtrhiU Rmrth SpuiJi< Pion Amendment Na Z
Initial Study/Draft. Negative Declaration
30
. Oty of Lake Elsinore c-'
AGEf~DA ITa,; NS1>l<mbe< 2008 :7
PACE'S OF ~ \..f
XII.
POPULATION AND HOUSING
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, U
by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No ImDact
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to population and housing. All
impacts related to population growth were addressed as part of prior approval processes for
the 1989 FEIR and the 1992 Addendum for SPAl. No impact is identified for this issue area.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact
SPA:! involves only a decrease in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres, and does not
constitute an action which would result in impacts related to population and housing. SPA:!
does not change the numbers of DUs or modify the densities as approved in SPA!. No
impact is identified for this issue area.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? No ImDact
Please refer to XII.b. above.
PO\lulation and Housin~ Mitil!ation Measures
None required.
U
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? No ImDact
SPA:! involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction alone
does not constitute an action which would result in an impact to public services. The need for
fire services for the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP area was addressed in the approval process
for SPA!. It should also be noted that a reduction in park area would equate to a reduction in
vegetation, thus the reduced park area may actually reduce fire potential. No impacts are
identified for this issue area.
b) Police protection? No ImDact
SPA2 involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction alone
does not constitute an action which would result in an impact to public services. The need for
police services for the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP area was addressed in the approval
process for SP AI. No impacts are identified for this issue area
u
MmrlodcA1JxrbiURanmSpetijirPIon AnmrdITKnI Nn. J
lnitiaJ Srudy/Draft Negative Ottlaranon
31
City of Lake Elsino~
~., .s...t""be,2008
AGENDA Ii C," ,;1."
PAGE "7" OF
(\
c) Schools? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction
alone does not constitute an action which would result' in an impact to public services.
Impacts to school services resulting from implementation of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch
SP area were addressed in the approval process for SPAl. SPA2 does not modify the number.
of DUs nor the allowable densities that would put pressure on school systems. No impacts
are identified for this issue area.
d) Parks? Less Than Significant Imoact
, ,
Although SPA2 involves a reduction in park land, the City has indicated that there is enough
park area throughout the SP area that this reduction would not substantially affect park
services. This reduction in park' area does not affect the City's Quimby Act parkland
dedication requirements based upon the criteria of 5 acres of parkland for every 1,000
residents. Both the existing Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and the SP A2 .exceed the
amount of park dedication required. Furthermore, City staff coordiJ:iated with Mr. Ray
Gonzales, Director of Community Services, City of La~e Elsinore, to confirm his support of
SPA2. '
"-j ,
The City may request that the applicant pay additional fees for the purpose of establishing;
improving; and maintaining park land within the City. However, this is still to be
determined and will be handled in the 'conditions of project approval. A less ,than significant
iInpact is identified. for this issue.' . . .' .
(\ e) Other public facilities? No Imoact .
SPA2 involves only a reduction in, park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction
alone does not constitute an action which would result in an impact to public services. SP A2
does not increase population, and thus, would not have an impact on the use of the. regions
libraries, hospitals, or other public facilities. No impact is identified for this issue area. .
Public Services Mitigation Measures
None required.
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase th~us~ of existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Imoact
SPA2 involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. Although SPA2
involves a reduction in park land from that approved in SPA1, the City has indicated that
there is enough park area throughout the overall SP area that this reduction would not
substantially affect the use recreational facilities. Further, all impacts related to population
growth that could put pressure on recreational facilities were addressed as part of prior
approval processes for the 1989 FEIR and tl1e 1992 Addendum for SPAl. , A less than
significant impact is identified for this issue area.' ,
n
MllrtWk Albtrbil! Ranch Spef!fi( Plan Ammdmenl No. 2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration
32
City of Lake Elsinore S .
. t er2008 '
AGENDA 1Ttf11~. -
PACE'" -, OF 9l '-1
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect' ,
on the environment? No Impact.
As discussed in XII.a. above, SP Ai involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to
4.8 acres. All impacts to the environment were addressed as part of prior approval processes
for the 1989 FEIR and the 1992 Addendum .for SPAl. As such, no impact is identified for
this issue area.' " ! '. " " . "
'j' .
u
Recreation Mitigation Measures
None required.
XV. TRANSPORTATIONjTRAFFIC
, ,.
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing '.
traffic load and capacity of the street systel!1.,(i.e., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the ,volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)? No Im\>act
, '
", .
SPA2 involves only 'a reduction in park land from 10:8 ~creS to 4.8 acres. This reduction
alone does not constitute an action which would result in impacts related to traffic.
Impacts to traffic associated with development of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP area were'
addressed in the approval process for SPA!. SPA2 does not increase the number of DUs nor
the allowable densities that would put pressure on traffic circulation, volume, emergency
access, safety, parking, or alternative modes of transportation. No impactsare'identified for
this issue area.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard U
established by the county congestion managementageI;lcy for designated roads
or highways? No ImDact '
Please refer to XV.a. above.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic
levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No ImDact
SPA2 involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. No partof SPA2
will affect air traffic patterns. No impacts are identified for this issue area.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g;, farm equipment)? ' No
ImDact
Please refer to XV.a. above.
e) Result in inadequate emergency ~ccess? No ImDact
Please refer to XV:a. above.
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact.,
Please refer to XV.a. above.
u
MNrrlncle AfberhiU Rmtch SpeaJic Pia" AmmdflKlfl Nil. 2
Initial Srudy/Draft Negative Declaration
33
Cil)' of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA 11;':;;1 tw?"be, 2008 r:;
Pt.aE I 8 OF <?> '-i
(\
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Imvact
Please refer to XV.a. above.
Transportation/Traffic Mitil!:ation Measures
None required.
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water
Quality Control Board? No Impact
SPA2 involves only a reduction in park land from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. This reduction
alone does not constitute an action which would result in impacts to utilities and service
systems, including water and wasterwater treatment, water supplies, storm water drainage
facilities, solid waste, and landfill capacity. Impacts to these systems associated with
development of the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP area were addressed in the approval
process for SPA!. SPA2 does not increase the number of DUs nor the allowable densities
that would put pressure on these systems. No impacts are identified for this issue area.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects. No Impact
n
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? No Imvact
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing
entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No
Imvact
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? No
Imvact
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
1) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs? No Im1;>act
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
(\
MIlfrifxA: A/berbiU Rand) Spt* Pion Amtndmtnl No. 2
lniri21 Study/Draft Neg.J.tive Decb.~tion
34
City or Lake Elsinore
'-0 .... I"'" 1= _.~ ':' &ro.tember 2008
kvEN~g i o;l;;"j l~~.
PAGE -, 't or-
c;
<f)\.f
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid
waste? No Impact .. .
Please refer to XVI.a. above.
Utilities/Services System Mitil!ation Measures
None required.
Mrmloel:. AlberhiU RAnch SfxcijU. PIim AmuuimenJ No. 1
Initial Study/Dr:aft Negative Declaration
35
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA rr,,;k~~n,be, 2008
PAGE Boo!'
c;
I()~
(j
u
u
v. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
(\
The following are Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance with Section 15065 of the
CEQA Guidelines.
(\
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduCe the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? No ImDact
As indicated in the analyses undertaken in support of this Initial Study; the reduction in park
area would not degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources,
SPA2 will not result in any significant. impacts to.biological resources. Additionally, as
discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, SPA2 will not result in any impacts to historical
or archaeological resources. The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan has already been
approved, and there would be no additional impacts associated with the reduction in park
area in the proposed SPA2.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects
of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of.past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.) No Impact
Based upon the analyses undertaken in support of this Initial Study, implementation of
SPA2 will not result in impacts that are considered considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of other projects. The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan has already
been approved, and there would be no additional impacts associated with the reduction in
park area in the proposed SP A2.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No Impact
Based upon the analyses undertaken in support of this Initial Study, implementation of
SPA2 would not cause a substantial adverse effect on humans. The reduction in park space
from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres would not result in any increase in air emissions, hazards, water
quality impacts, or flooding, nor would it affect safety, public services, or emergency access.
The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan has already been approved, and there would be
no additional impacts associated with the reduction in park area in the proposed SPA2.
(\
Mmrbxk AlherhiU RPndJ Spetjic Pion Amendmtnl No.. 2
Initial Study /Dl1l.ft Negative Declaration
. 36
City of Lake Elsinore
September 2008
ACEt~DA IT:::M NO.
PACE e I OF
5
B\!'
VI. NEGATIVE DECLARATION
, . .
City of Lake Elsinore
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in
accordance with the California Environmental. Quality Act Section 21091 and
21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Public Review Period: September 2, 2008 to September 22, 2008
ProjeCt Name: Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.2
Project Applicant: Castle & Cooke - Alberhill Ranch, Inc. 17600 Collier Avenue, Suite
C120, Lake Elsinore, CA 92539. .
Project Location: The proposed project site (SPA2) lies witllin tile boundaries of Murdock
Alberhill Ranch which encompasses approximately 511.4 acres of land. More specifically, the
site is bound by Nichols Road to tile soutll, and located between Lake Street and Collier
Avenue.
u
Project Description: SPA2 proposes to modify the configuration of the public park site
located at tile eastern edge of Planning Area 2. Witll tile City's approval of tIlis request, tile
park site will be decreaSed from 10.8 acres to 4.8 acres. Modification of tile park site as
proposed will enable a more efficient and desirable subdivision design for Planning Area 2. U
SPA2 does not alter the number of DU,land uses, nor the density within Planning Area 2 or
tile Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan.
MNrdode AlkrhiU Ranrh Speciji,. Plan Amtndmenl No.2
Initial Study/~raft Negative Declaration
37
City of Lake: Elsinore
Se~~ember 2008
AGENDA ITeM NO.
PAGE 9,;;). Of'
u
c:;
'6'1
n
FINDINGS
This is to advise that the City of Lake Elsinore, acting as the lead agency, has
conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect
on the environmental and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the
following findings:
The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The Initial Study identifies potentially significant effects but:
(1) Proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur.
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
(3) Mitigation measures are not required to ensure all potentially significant impacts
are reduced to levels of insignificance.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[\ If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report
will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached
Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at
the City of Lake Elsinore, Planning Division, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore
(951) 674-3124. Please send all comments to the attention of Wendy Worthey.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the
review period.
8-28-08
~~
Date of Determination
Wendy Worthey, Principal Environmental Planner
(1
Mmrkxk AlbuhiU Ranch SJxtifi. Plan All<<ltdmeltl No.2
Initial Study/Draft Negative Dedaration
38
eil! Of.{1~EIs;no<<
ACEN~~~~E""g' 3" ,,~;a
c:;
?l'L
ACENDA ITl:M NO. . C;
PAGE ey OF '64
u
u
u
CITY OF v~
n LAKE ,5,LSiNORE
~.~. DREAM E,XTREME_
n
n
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
, HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
TOM WEINER,
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOVEMBER 4, 2008
KEN A. SEUMALO,
. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT TITLE:
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY OF THE SUMMARY
STREET VACATION FOR A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY KNOWN AS "WASSON CANYON ROAD"
Proiect Request
The Planning Commission review the staff report to determine if this request for ,
Summary Street Vacation of a portion of the Wasson Canyon Road conforms to the
General Plan Circulation element.
Proiect Location
The Vacation Segment is located between Riverside Street and Rosetta Canyon Drive.
Proiect Description
A Summary Vacation of the right-of-way known as Wasson Canyon Road within the
incorporated limits of the City of Lake Elsinore. The excess portion of right-of-way is
owned in easement by the City of Lake Elsinore.
Analvsis
As a requirement of the Ramsgate Specific Plan, the proposed alignment of Wasson
Canyon Road was required to be "vacated" and replaced with a new roadway network
to serve the adjacent parcels. The current alignment of the Wasson Canyon Road right-
,..,.-..,-",,,;.\ rec.,: ',-' (.0-
_'V....~c..-,. .......... .......
." ~p I ,...: 0
rr'-..J;':':-L-':..r,i"---L-
Wasson Canyon Road Street Vacation
November 4, 2008
Page 2 of 2
()
of-way lies within the Centex Homes' "Rosetta Canyon" development. It is not used by
the public for street purposes and is not a city maintained road. The Vacation Segment
exists only on paper and all adjacent parcels have access to the surrounding public
right-of-way. The alternative roads are: Rosetta Canyon Road, Elsinore Hills Road and
local access roads proposed in connections with the development of Tract 25476, Tract
25478, and Tract 25479. A majority of the original land dedicated for Wasson Canyon
Road now lies within a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Area rendering the
alignment unsuitable for use as roadway right-of-way. Staff is in concurrence with this
request.
Recommendations
a. Adopt a resolution finding that the Summary Vacation of Wasson Canyon Road
as described on the attached Plat Map and Legal Description conforms to the
Lake Elsinore General Plan; and
b. Direct staff to forward a copy of this report and the Planning Commission
Resolution to the City Council for consideration.
Prepared By: Ken Seumalo rJ6
Director of Public Works
Tom Weiner~
Acting Director of Community Development
Approved By:
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Resolution
2. Legal Description
3. Plat Map
u
u
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE~OF-3-
(',
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPT FINDINGS THAT THE SUMMARY
VACATION OF WASSON CANYON ROAD CONFORMS TO THE CITY'S
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, has filed an application with the City of Lake
Elsinore requesting the vacation of portions of Wasson Canyon Road right-of-way
located within Centex Homes' "Ramsgate" development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore. has been
delegated with the responsibility of making. recommendations to the City Council
regarding whether a street vacation conforms to the City's General Plan Circulation
Element; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Engineering Division and other interested
parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on November 4, 2008.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
(', SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the
portion of Wasson Canyon Road referenced above is excess right-of-way and the
vacation of that portion of the public street conforms to the City's General Plan
Circulation Element.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is
categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA
(14 C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines") pursuant to a Class 1 exemption
for existing facilities because the Project involves the vacation of a portion of a street
which involves negligible or no expansion of use. (14 C.C.R. 9 15301.)
SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented and the findings above,
the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that the
vacation of that portion of Wasson Canyon Road referenced above is consistent with
the City's General Plan Circulation Element.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 2008, by the
following vote:
(\
kGE~~JA tTE~.1 r~o.
PAGE "3
b
Go- U
. ,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 2008"_
PAGE 2 OF 3
ATTEST:
Tom Weiner " ,
Acting Director of Community Development .
Axel Zanelli, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE Y. OF
u
u
u
<0
"t
(\
(\
(\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_
PAGE 3 OF 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)S5.
)
I, TOM WEINER, Interim Director of Community Development of the City of Lake
Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008- was adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on
the 4th day of November 2008~ and that the same was adopted by the following' vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tom Weiner
Acting Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE S
OF
b
<J
EXHIBIT "An
Right of Way Vacation - Abandonment of
WASSON CANYON ROAD
Being portions of Wasson Canyon Road, declared a public highway January 8, 1890 by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors' and depicted by map number 52 of
Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the Riverside County Surveyor, lying within Sections
28, 29 and 32, Township 5 South, Range 4 West S.B.M., County of Riverside, State of
. California, having a basis of bearing.of North 31030'44" West and described as follows:
Parcel.1 . .' . .
A strip of land 50.00 feet wide, 25.00. feet on each side of the following described
centerline:' '.
()
COMMENCING at the northeast comer of Tract No. 25476, recorded in Book 403,
Pages 7 through 29, inclusive, of Maps, in the Riverside County Recorder's Office, said
point being a point on the centerline of Riverside Street as shown on said tract map;
Thence along the northerly line of said Tract No. 25476, said line also being the
centerline of said Riverside Street, South 89045'30" West 289.37 feet;
Thence departing said northerly line and centerline, South 00014'30" East 44.00 feet to a
point on the southerly. Right-of-Way line of said Riverside Street as shown per said Tract
No. 25476, said point also being a point on the centerline of said Wasson Canyon Road
and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; .
Thence along said centerline the following twenty-three (23) courses:
1) Continuing South 00014'30" East 778.06 feet;
2) South 54053'47" West 330.00 feet; ()
3) South 48005'47" West 264.00 feet;
4) South 33018'47" West 132.00 feet;
5) South 86006'47" West 132.00 feet;
6) North 55055'13" West 660.00 feet;
7) South 25036'47" West 264.00 feet;
8) South 10046'13" East 264.00 feet;
9) South 66043'47" West 429.00 feet;
10) South 11038'13" East 264.00 feet;
11) South 43036'47" West 709.50 feet;
12) North 78018'13" West 264.00 feet;
13) South 10033'13" East 264.00 feet;
14) South 72034'47" West 396.00 feet;
15) South 45049'47" West 561.00 feet;
16) South 15051'47" West 429.00 feet;
17) South 68048'47" West 297.00 feet;
18) South 04033'13" East 594.00 feet;
19) South 20048'47" West 396.00 feet;
20) South 65043'47" West 231.00 feet;
21) South 24009'47" West 330.00 feet;
22) South 60041'47" West 594.00 feet;
23) South 76036'47" West 130.31 feet to the southerly line of Tract No. 25478, Book
374, Pages 80 through 94, inclusive, of Maps, in the Riverside County Recorder's Office,
said point also being the POINT OF TERMINUS.
Page 1 of2
H:\00020\Mapping\Legals\Wasson Canyon Road\Wasson Canyon Road Vacation-Abandonment Original
alignment_FINAL DRAFT -revision.doc
AGENDA 1Tl'",j NO.
PAGE (p
u
~
0:" q
n The sidelines are to be lengthened or shortened so as to being on the southerly Right-of-
Way of said Riverside Street, meet at all angle points and end on said southerly line of
Tract No. 25478.
TOGETHER WITH:
PARCEL 2.
Being portions of Wasson Canyon Road as shown on Parcels 3 and 4, Parcel Map No.
8112, Book 73, Page 69 of Parcel Maps. Riverside County Recorder's Office, also, being
portions of Parcels 2 and 4 of Lot Line Adjustment No. 02-09 recorded on 3/11/03 as
Instrument No. 2003-169225 of Official Records, all situated within the Northeast
Quarter of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 4 West S.B.M., County of Riverside,
State of California, described as follows:
A strip of land 88.00 'feet'wide, 44.00 feet on each side of the following described
centerline:
(\
.
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of Parcel Map No. 8112, recorded in Book 73,
Page 69 of Parcel Maps, in the Riverside County Recorder's Office;
Thence along the northerly lirie of said Parcel Map No. 8112, North 89041'45" West
510.00 feet to a point on the centerline of Wasson Canyon Road as shown on said
Parcel Map, said point also being the TRUE POINT 01' BEGINNING;
Thence along said centerline the following three (3) courses:
1) South 04020'06" West 732.57 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
westerly and having a radius of 700.00 feet; .
2) Southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 31031'40" an arc
length of 385.18 feet;
3) South 35051'46" West 282.67 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Parcel
Map No. 8112, said point also being the POINT OF TERMINUS.
The sidelines are to be lengthened or shortened so as to being on the northerly line of
Parcel Map No. 8112, meet at all angle points and end on said southerly line of Parcel
Map No. 8112, said southerly line more particularly shown as the southerly line of said
Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment 02-09.
Excepting therefrom that portion lying within Lots Q and T of Tract No. 25478, Book 374,
Pages 80 through 94, inclusive, of Maps, in the County of Riverside Recorder's Office.
See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made apart hereof.
n
Prepared under the supervision of:
J2j~A fLJL
Robert N. Beuschlein, LS 7874
Expires: December 31, 2008
?/Z.?~8
, D~te
Page2of2
H:\OOO20\Mapplng\Legals\Wasson Canyon Road\Wa'sson Canyon Road Vacation-Abandonment Original
alignmenCFINAl DRAFT -revision.doc
ACENDA moM mJ.
PAGE -,
lp
q-
or:
EXHIBIT "B"
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
SEC. 28 & 29 T.5S.,RAW
,
fZW-;1..d
ROBERT N. BEUSCHlElN. PLS 7874
EXP. 12/3VD8
...=-""""-~,-", VACATION I ABANDONMENT OF
. 4\l LAND Sll~\1~ . WASSON CANYON ROAD
. ~<if~8E: ~
J:~ ~. lIS"oS< {,\l. PREPARED BY CHECKED BY DATE
3 ~ ~. ~ "P 1h. RNB. GE 6/08 SHEET 1 OF 9
~ff '" LS. 7874 z ~ .
_ / Expires 12/31/08 J . HUNSAKER.... a:. ASSOCIATES...
1~'rt', ~,.~ ~.../ INWf:v'~~rJ:NCREGION
I . "'-l~Jt _. \~<F72900 NlNilS ~~I<&.I II A-15
\4"" CA\. ~ ' RNERSIDE CA 82504: 151 7200
. . =- PlNNHC/fNCINEERIHC~ REIA'IICIHS
\00020 ppIng 1~t'Ne. yon V.c._O
PAGE~Oi: q
EXHIBIT "B"
II
Ii
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 1
)
I
I
---I
'b
o
o
11
Ii
!I
1\
;'
.~
fA
PAcett OF 9
D
()
(j
u